Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS MICHAEL P. CORBETT, ARCHITECT 401 W. LANTANA ROAD, SUITE 18 LANTANA, FLORIDA 33462 Meeting with: December II, 1998 4:30pm Dr. LaLane's Dental Office Permit #98- 3887 Mr. Bob Donovan, Director of plan Revi wf~!:j,."" PLANNING Mr.Michael P. Corbett, Architect lONINGDf~~D Mr.Sabastian puda, Engineering Administrator Mr.Jim Nguyen, P&Z plan Review Tech Boynton Beach Bldg Dept. To clear permit comments on the Project 588-2236 FILE MEMO Meeting Date: project: Meeting At: Mtg.purpose: Points Discussed: 1. Mike Corbett reviewed the comments per the engineering' department as he had picked them up on the plan to Sebastian Puda. 2. Mike Corbett indicated that he did add the oneway signs in front of both entrances in the median and corrected the handicapped parking detail, as its was to Boynton's earlier approved code. 3. Mr puda wanted Boynton's detail of the swale between the parking and we showed him the pervious parking lot swale which is not the same. We told him we were using pervious concrete, that it was not the same as typical paving and that it did not require the deep swales like standard paving does. I told him this would be very good environmentally and good for storm water retent~on on the project also. 4. Mr. puda said he could not approve the project until the product was approved by Boynton Beach's Engineer. We told him that we had informed the City as far back as the TRC for site plan review on this project, that we intended to use "pervious concrete" for the pavem~nt, ,and everyone was enthusiastic about it. Comment: By the comments and the requirements Mr. puda was asking for in connection to the parking lot perviqus concrete, it became obvious that he did not understand how pervious concrete works. r tried to explain but, the discussion became somewhat skewed. 5. We asked Mr. puda if he had ever used it before, understood how it worked, or even knew what it was? He said no. We said that it is so good that once he saw it he would be insisting on it all over Boynton. We told him the swale detail was on the drawing. 6. He said that he would not approved it unless the engineer did. We would need to submit it for approval first. We told him this shouldn't hold up the project. He said then r can't approve it. Mr. puda then left the meeting. Comment: Mike Corbett then reviewed the Planning & Zoning comments with Jim Nguyen. 7. We reviewed comments with Jim and he approved the plans and signed them off. END OF MEMO MPC! sc 4{f1Z-::_- cc: Dr. LaLane, Dept. of Development, Bldg. Dept., P & Z Dept. MICHAEL P. CORBETT, ARCHITECT 401 W. LANTANA ROAD, SUITE '8 LANTANA, FLORIDA 33462 (407) 588-2236 Meeting Date: December II, 1998 ~~ ~ Ii' \It; 1', DEe I 4 /998 FILE MEMO Per Telecom wi Meeting At: Mr. Mike Haag, Director Of plan Review Mr. Don Johnson, Chief Building Inspector Mr. Mike Jacobson, Chief Electrical Inspector Mr. Michael P. Corbett, Architect Mr. Mike Rumpf, Director of Planning & Zoning Boynton Beach Bldg Dept. project: Dr. LaLane's Dental Office Permit #98- 3887 Meeting with: Mtg.Purpose: To Review comments on the building permit set Points Discussed: ~e reviewed the comments stamped on the plans: 1. "Sign Permit Required" (Not True) The existing sign was granfathered, as an approved existing sign and a sign permit was not required. Mike Haag agreed, and said he would not require a sign permit to construct the sign but he would need to approve the face of the existing sign prior to when the na~e was painted on each side. COMMENT: We were a~ked by the planning department to show the existing sign on our site plan approval drawings, which we did. This sign was discussed in front of the City Commission. Tambri Hayden confirmed to the f:'>lllilli:.;:iif.dl LrldL ctli::: :::ifjn Wi:13 an a[J[.Jr-0v<.:d siCjrl .:.nCl we wer.e told by them that a sign permit would not be required in as much as all we were doing was going to repaint the masonry to match the building and the Doctor's name and Dental Office with street address number in black letters on each side. They said this would not be a problem. 2. MiKe Haag and Don Johnson were informed by Mike Corbett that the time was critical to clear this permit out of the Building Department. Don informed us that Mr. Kastarlak had informed him of that fact very directly yesterday after the doctor had contacted the city. I told Don and Mike Haag that I felt they were trying to accomplish this, and, that I had let Mr. Kastarlak know this earlier, but we needed to make this permit ha~pen as soon as we could. FILE MEMO Otd 12/11/98 Page two 3. "Site Lighting per-mit Requir-ed" (Not Tr-ue) Mike Corbett told Mike Haag and Don Johnson that Site Lighting permit which was stamped on the drawings by Mike Jacobson was not required per discussions with Mike Rumpf and Mike Jacobson. The Doctor, at Mike Jacobson's request, had given the city a letter signed by him and the Architect, stating that he was not going to have office hours past 5:00pm in the evening. Then the building department requested that the doctor come back in and have his signatur-e notarized on the same letter-. We wece under the impcession that the City would not r-equice site lighting per the Boynton Beach Code as this business was not open at 5:30 or later. Per Mike Cor-bett, the County lighting code does not kick in until one half hour- after- dusk for business. Mike Haag called Mike Rumpf on the speaker phone for- cler-itication. Mike Rumpf contir-med that since the city had the letter- and the doctor was pr-oviding some site lighting which would be near the spaces most often used in an emergency call that he would waive the max-min average foot candle city requir-ements and ther-eby deleting the necessity of the photometr-ic study for the entir-e parking lot. Mike Haag did ask for the photometric cut sheet on the fixture along with the pole height. Mike Jacobson did want to be sure that the fixture was a down light and would not shine in neighboring yar-ds. We confirmed it would not, and that we would get them the cut sheet for the fixture. Bob Donovan infor-med Mike Corbett, the Engineer-ing and the Planning Depts. would review their comments thdt we had picked up on the plans after we met with Mike. END OF MEMO MPC/sc cc: DC'. LaLane Dept. of Development Boynton Beach Bldg. Dept. p ~ 7.. DE.-p-l MICHAEL P. CORBETT, ARCHITECT 401 W. LANTANA ROAD, SUITE '8 LANTANA, FLORIDA 33462 FILE MEMO Meeting Date: December 08, 1998 1lC14m3 project: Dr. LaLane's Dental Office Permit #98- 3887 PLANNING AND ZONING OEPT Meeting with: Bldg Code Permit Administrator Corbett, Architect , Engineering Tech plan Review Tech Dept. Meeting At: Mr.Mike Haag, Mr.Michael P. Mr.Ken Mr.Jim Nguyen, P&Z Boynton Beach Bldg Mtg.purpose: To clear permit comments on the project Points Discussed: 1. Mike Corbett indicated he was told to see Linda about picking up either the permit plans or comments, that he had to correct for permit. The owner had called and said to see her and that the permit was ready. She told Mike Corbett that she would give him the plans or the comments but not both and that he would need to see Mike Haag with the plans and permit comments. 2. Mike Corbett showed the comments per the engineering and planning department as he had picked them up on the plan to Mike Haag. 3. Mike Haag was informed by Mike Corbett that he was called by the Doctor, and told that the permit was ready ~t the Building Department. Mike Haag said they were tryiny to accomplish this, and, that he got my fax letter which cut things loose at Water utilities,but we still needed to clear Engineering and Planning & Zoning. We told Mike Haag that we had tried to see them but that on the scheduled day they could not see us due to visiting dignitaries. We agreed try to see them now and to make this permit happen as soon as we could. Comment: Mike Corbett then went to the Engineering Dept. to clear their comments. 2236 FILE MEMO Dtd 12/08/98 Page two 4. Mike Corbett met with Ken in Engineering and reviewed Mr. Sabastian puda's comments on the project. Ken was extremely helpful to explain and clarify the comments carefully and we determined that we could accomplish almost all the comments without a problem. We did add the oneway signs in front of both entrances and correct the handicapped parking detail as ours was to Boynton's earlier code. We told him, we would be using pervious concrete and, that it would be a very good thing for Boynton to get on board with for other projects too. Comment: Mike Corbett then went to the Planning & Zoning Dept. to clear Jim Nguyen's comments. 5. Mike Corbett met with Jim next and reviewed his comments on the project. Jim was also very helpful and clarified any questions about his comments. We told Jim that we were not required to have a dumpster per a letter from trash collection department. We had requested and were granted curb side pick up. Jim's only other question that we discussed was that our Landscape Architect had discussed the deletion of the vines on the back side of the wall. He was told by Kevin he thought, that they would omit that comment as the vines would die due to lack of water and there was no way to maintain them on the back side of the wall. 6. Mike Haag asked us, when all the comments were picked up, to bring the plans directly back into him, so they would not sit on a desk by mistake. END Of MEMO MPC/ sc-~~:/< cc: Dr. LaLane Dept. of Development Boynton Beach Bldg. Dept. Planning & Zonin3 Dept. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: FIRE & LIFE SAFETY DIVISION Memorandum No. 98-221 ~ \lit' Tambri Heyden, Director Planning & Zoning Division Steve Gale, Fire Marshal /~ Deputy Chief - Fire Rescue DEfPartment March 4, 1998 Robert A. Lalane II, DMD 2521 S. Federal Hwy. NWSP 98-003 Development Department Memo No. PZ 98-066 ill ~@~nw~ ill MAR 518 PLANNING AND ZONING OEPT. We have no comments on the plans submitted ( L-1, L-2, Sheets 1,4,5). We recommend this project be forwarded through the approval process. CC: File cn I OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Tambri Heyden NWSP 98-003 DATE: 03/04/98 SUBJECT: Dental Office REFERENCES: PZ 98-066 ENCLOSURES: I have the following comments in reference to this site plan. 1. There is no stop sign for the exiting ofthe facility shown on any of the plans. 2. There is no detail for handicap areas shown. FROM: FILE: fD) ~ i " . dll ~If:;-~-:~ ~ .__---1 ;D ; 1. , .'t~):':.t,;" Recreation & Park Department Memorandum N n \17 1I,fD) - 3 /9gJ lPJJ To: Tambri Heydcn, Planning and Zoning Dircctor From: John Wildner, Parks Superintendent I(tJ!3;1? t A. i.AlANC 1I he..vtAL OFf.'"iC. ~/.5/r~ -- '<,r'l Re: Date: The Recreation and Park Department has reviewed the above listed plans. There are currently no outstanding recreation-related issues. The plans may continue through the normal review process. JW -'~--_.~---~~,--~-_.._--_..-------._-,-.._,----'- ---- RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM 00 Ul~OW~~ MAR I 6 1998 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Kevin John Hallahan, F orester/Environmeotalist J< J H- Robert A. Lalane II, DMD (new dental office) New Site Plan- 1st Review Re: DATE: March 16, 1998 Site SDecific Requirements I have no comments pertaining to the above site. Code Reference Code of Ordinances Environmental, Chapter 7.5 Tree Protection. Kjh file MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 98 - 090 TO: T~b~eyden, Planning Director p~~. Guidry, Utilities Director March 17, 1998 FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: New Site Plan Dental office for Robert Lalane We offer the following comments on this project: GENERAL COMMENTS 1) All utilities easements shall be shown on the rectified landscaping drawings so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utilities easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. LDR Sec. 7.5-18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 2) Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1500 g.p.m. as stated in LDR chap. 6, Art. , Sec. 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater. (see Sec. 26-16(a)). SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1) Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utilities easements. Please show all existing and proposed easements on the site plan drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet (for proposed easements). The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in Sec. 26-33(a) of the Code. 2) This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the certificate of occupancy. 3) LDR chap. 6, Article IV, Sec. 16 requires that all points on each commercial building be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. 4) Show existing and proposed water and sewer services to the site. 5) Appropriate backflow preventers will be required on the domestic water service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in accordance with Sec. 26-207. 6) A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this office has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to serve the project. (Sec. 26-15) Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella (375-6404) of this office. JAG/PVM xc: Skip Milor Peter Mazzella File Dt..PARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. DD 98-062 ill ~ @ ~ u w rn. ~.' ~ "168 ll~ .... TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning and Zoning Administrator Don Johnson, Deputy Building Official'o--CY John Yeend, P.E" City Engineer ~ :jllb~€ March 16, 1998 FROM: DATE: RE: ROBERT A. LALANE II, DMD (NEW DENTAL OFFICE) - NWSP 98-003 NEW SITE PLAN 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS We have reviewed the subject plans and offer the following comments that should be addressed prior to the project being forwarded for Board review: Buildin2 Division (Site Specific & Permit Comments) - Michael E, Haag 561-375-6350 I. Land Development Regulations, Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan, Section 10. I. I states, "Signs shall be designed and treated as part of the architecture of the building and shall be reviewed at time of site plan review," therefore, add to the submittal, the detail drawings of proposed site and building signage, The detail drawings shall include: a. Identify where the building .~ignage is located on the face of the building by dimensioning their location on the elevation view drawings, The location shall show the distance from the edge of the building to the edge of the proposed signage including dimensioning the distance from the finish floor to the top of the proposed signage, b. Identify the size of the building signage by dimensioning on the elevation view drawings, the width and height of the proposed building signage. Also indicate in tabular form, on the elevation view drawing, the square foot area of each sign, Note; the allowed size of signage is identified in Section 2, Article IV, of Chapter 2 J - Sign Code and the method to determine the sign area is defined in Chapter J - General Provisions, Article II - Definitions (sign, area of). c. Please refer to the sign code Chapter 21 - Sign Code of the Land Development Regulations for other applicable regulations that may apply to the proposed site and building signage. d. Please refer to Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan for other requirements regarding site and builtling ,,'ignage, e. If no building .~ignage is requested place the following note on the elevation view drawings: Building signage not approved. Site plan review will be required for building signage. f Label on the landscape plan the location of the existing .~ite .~ign. g. If there are changes proposed to the existing .~ite sign provide detailed and dimensioned drawings depicting the existing signage and the proposed changes including indicating whether the sign will be illuminated and what type of illumination. Refer to the sign code for regulations regarding size and height of the sign. h. If no changes are proposed to the existing .~ite sign place the following note on the site plan next to the symbol that represents the existing sign: Existing site sign to remain with no changes, Department of Development Merr _. mdum No. DO 98-062- Re: Robert A. Lalane II, DMD (New Dental Office) - NWSP 98-003 New ~Ile Plan l't Review March 16, 1998 Page #2 2. Add to the proposed Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Paving and Drainage Plan a labeled symbol that represents the location of the accessible route that is required from the accessible access aisle(s) located within the accessible parking space(s) to the accessible entrance of the building. Also identify on the Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Paving and Drainage Plan the width and type of material proposed for the accessible route, Place a note on the site plan next to the labeled symbol indicating that the accessible route complies with the regulations specified in the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, [Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section 4.3, Accessible Route and Section 4.6, Parking and Passenger Loading Zones] Note; Following site plan approval the subsequent working drawings that are required to be submitted for permit review shall include identifying the location, width, type of material, slope and surface finish texture for the required accessible route. The permit plans, where applicable, shall include detail drawings of accessible ramps, The drawings shall depict the location of the ramp(s) including specifying the type of material, surface finish, width, length, slope, size of top and bottom landings and where required the appropriate handrails, The illustration of the accessible route that is required to be shown on the drawings submitted for site plan review may be general in nature, however, the subsequent permit drawings shall contain specific information to determine the accessible route complies with the regulations specified in the accessibility code. [Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section 4.3, Accessible Route and Section 4.6, Parking and Passenger Loading Zones] 3. Add to all plan view drawings of the site (site plan, landscape plan, paving & drainage plan and water & sewer plan) the easements of record identified and shown on the submitted survey, Where applicable, remove all buildings and structures from encroaching into and/or over an easement. 4, Prior to a permit being issued to construct or install the requested improvements a unity of title shall be processed to unify both parcels. The form shall be properly filled out, executed, recorded in Palm Beach County and a copy placed into the permit file, Note: City approved Unity of Title forms are available at the :J:>>ermit Applications Group located in the Building Division front office, EI12ineeril12 Division (Site Specific Comments) - Sebastian Puda & Ken Hall 561-375-6280 1. Submit a site drainage plan showing elevations, flow arrows, proposed drainage structures and related treatment facilities, etc. [LOR Chapter 4, Section 7,F.I,] 2. Need Engineer's certification letter that drainage will conform to all rules, regulations, codes, etc. of the City of Boynton Beach. [LDR Chapter 4, Section 7.F,2.] 3. Show proposed location of site lighting at all on-site pavement locations. [LOR Chapter 4, Section 7.B.4. and LOR Chapter 23, Article ILA.] . 4. Show traffic control markings and signage (stop signs, stop bars, etc.) where necessary on site plan, [LOR Chapter 23, Article II.B,I. & 2. And City Standard Drawing B-900 12] Department of Development Memorandum No. DD 98-062 Re: Robert A. Lalane II, DMD (New Dental Office) - NWSP 98-003 New Site Plan 1 st Review March 16, 1998 Page #3 5. Provide a curb detail per City Standard Drawing B-900 12 and show on plans all curbed areas required to protect landscaping from vehicle encroachment. [LDR Chapter 23, Article II,E.] 6. Resurface existing circular driveway so that stormwater is contained on site. [LDR Chapter 23, Article II.F.] 7, Show the 4' sidewalk extending thru both driveways. [LDR Chapter 23, Article II.P.] 8. Provide a typical cross-section of the new parking lot areas in accordance with LDR Chapter 23, Article II,Q. 9, Parking stall backup distance needs to be 27 feet minimum per City standard B-90013. 10. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at time of application, These permits include, but are not limited to the following; site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and traffic control devices, Permits required from agencies such as the FDOT, PBC, SFWMD, DERM, L WDD, DEP and any other permitting agency shall be included with your permit request. 11. Provide a detail showing a ramp or curb cut to meet ADA requirements from the pavement to the front porch area, [Florida Accessibility Code] 12, Provide handicap accessible route from U,S, #1 sidewalk to dental office. [Florida Accessibility Code] Recommendations 1, Since the plan provides more parking spaces than required, consider locating the two handicap spaces to the west side of the east parking area closest to the building. This will provide more pervious area for drainage and landscaping. 2, If the handicap spaces are to remain as is, the west five foot access path is not required (one 5' access aisle can serve 2 handicap stalls), It will also eliminate 275 sq, ft, of pavement. Note: Handicap spaces and related striping need only to be 18' long. MHlSP/KH:ck Xc: Bulent Kastarlak Michael Haag Sebastian Puda Ken Hall C:\My Doculllcnts\Rohcrt A. J .alanc II. Ncw Site Plan 1st Review.doc rn moomowm 00 WI 11_ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #98-071 TO: Tambri Heyden, AICP, Planning & Zoning Director THRU: C. Larry Roberts, Public Works Director FROM: Mark Lips, Sanitation Foreman SUBJ: New Site Plan - 1 st Review - Robert A. Lalane II, DMD DATE: March 16, 1998 This project has no locations or drawings for a dumpster enclosure. The Public Works Department would have to see the drawings before this project would be approved to go forward. If can pickup is to be requested, it would have to be in writing to the Public ~~D~ctor for ~s ~pproval. -< /~ u. <<jM MLlcr FIRE & LIFE SAFETY DIVISION Memorandum No. 98-248 ffDJ ~ @ l\ J It] f fn1 UI1 API! 2 0 _ ~I @..... . (~:- ~.~ TO: Tambri Heyden, Director Planning & Zoning Division FROM: Steve Gale, Fire Marshal ~ // Deputy Chief - Fire Rescue [1~nt DATE: April 17, 1998 SUBJECT: Robert Lelane II, DDS 2521 S. Federal Hwy NWSP 98-003 The fire hydrant has been placed to our satisfaction and we recommend this plan be forwarded, CC: File .-' m ~@~uw~ APR 2 0 1188 ill Recreation & Park Department Memorandum To: Tambri Heyden, Planning and Zoning Dire tor 5 ( IV 6vJ b ,(yt/(A G 0 ft=r~ j Re: John Wildner, Parks Superintendent /fo &/ff t,A ~lflv& 11. 0//7/ 1% ' From: Date: The Recreation and Park Department has reviewed the above listed plans. There are currently no outstanding recreation-related issues. The plans may continue through the normal review process. JW DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. DD 98-094 rn rn TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning and Zoning Administrator Don Johnson, Deputy Building Official'~ / John Yeend, P.E., City Engineer ~~~ '18 April 24, 1998 FROM: DATE: RE: ROBERT LALANE II, DDS (NEW DENTAL OFFICE) - NWSP 98-003 NEW SITE PLAN 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS We recommend approval of the request subject to the following comments: Buildin2 Division (Permit Comments) I. No building sign age was shown or requested with the submittal. Therefore place the following note on the site plan drawing: "Building signage not approved, Site plan review will be required for future building signage," 2, Add to the proposed Site Plan a labeled symbol that represents the location of the accessible path that is required from the accessible building entrance to the accessible access aisle located adjacent to the accessible parking spaces, Also identify on the Site Plan the width and type of material proposed for the accessible path, Place a note on the site plan next to the labeled symbol indicating that the accessible route complies with the regulations specified in the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. [Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section 4,3, Accessible Route and Section 4,6, Parking and Passenger Loading Zones] Note: Following site plan approval the subsequent working drawings that are required to be submitted for permit review shall include identifying the location, width, type of material, slope and surface finish texture for the required accessible route, The permit plans, where applicable, shall include detail drawings of accessible ramps, The drawings shall depict the location of the ramp(s) including specifying the type of material, surface finish, width, length, slope, size of top and bottom landings and where required the appropriate handrails, The illustration of the accessible route that is required to be shown on the drawings submitted for site plan review may be general in nature, however, the subsequent permit drawings shall contain specific information to determine that the accessible route complies with the regulations specified in the accessibility code. 3. Add to all plan view drawings of the site (site plan and, landscape plan) the easement of record identitied and shown on the submitted survey. Where applicable, remove all buildings and structures from encroaching into and/or over the easement. 4. Submit two (2) copies of the recorded unity of title form with your application for building permits to make the improvements to the subject property. En2:ineerin2 Division (Site Specific Comments) I, Need Engineer's certification letter that drainage will conform to all rules, regulations, codes, etc. of the City of Boynton Beach, [LOR Chapter 4, Section 7,F.2.] Department of Development Memorandum No, DD 98-094 Re: Robert Lalane II, DDS, New Site Plan 2nd Review Cominents April 24, 1998 Page #2 2. Show traffic control markings and signage (stop signs, stop bars, etc,) at egress ends of parking lots. [LOR Chapter 23, Article II.B. ]. & 2, And City Standard Drawing B-90012] Also, add "Right Turn Only" and associated arrow markings to both egress driveways, Install "One Way" arrow post signs in median opposite the subject driveways. Add 25' double yellow longitudinal centerlines to both driveways and ingress pavement arrows. [MUTCD 2B-29] 3. Provide a curb detail per City Standard Drawing B-900 12 and show on plans all curbed areas required to protect landscaping from vehicle encroachment. [LOR Chapter 23, Article II.E.] 4. Resurface existing circular driveway, if necessary, so that stormwater is contained on site, [LOR Chapter 23, Article II.F.] 5. Provide a typical cross-section of the new parking lot areas in accordance with LOR Chapter 23, Article II,Q. 6, All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at time of application, These permits include, but are not limited to the following; site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and traffic control devices, Permits required from agencies such as the FOOT, PBC, SFWMD, DERM, LWDD, DEP and any other permitting agency shall be included with your permit request. 7, Provide a detail showing a ramp or curb cut to meet ADA requirements from the pavement to the front porch area, [Florida Accessibility Code] 8, Provide handicap accessible route from U.S, #1 sidewalk to dental office. Also, north handicap space may be reduced to 12' wide, [Florida Accessibility Code] 9, Add detail of handicap post sign and locate on plans, 10, Show on landscape plans the clear sight triangles specified in FOOT Index 546 for both driveways, Also, add note on plan that within the sight triangles there shall be a clear unobstructed view within 30" and 6' from the pavement. [LOR Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5,H.] Recommendation 1, Since only southbound traffic can access site, consider making the existing circular driveway one- way from north to south, If done, the width of the driveway could be reduced creating a larger landscape area around the existing sign, MH/SPIKH:ck Xc: Bulent Kastarlak Michael Haag Sebastian Puda Ken Hall Cllvly DOCUlllcntslRohcrt I.. I.alanc II. Ncw Sitc Plan 2nd Rcvicw.doc RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM ~ m@:?owrn rn ~ ;~ . APR 7.. 1. PLANNING AND , ZONING OEPT. TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director /<-)tf FROM: Kevin John Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Re: Robert Lalane II, DDS (new dental office) New Site Plan (NSP)- 2nd Review DATE: April 28, 1998 Site Specific Requirements I have no comment on the proposed NSP for the site. The project should continue in the normal review process. Kjh file PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #98-113 Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Direct~~ tJ C. Larry Roberts, Public Works Director (fJV TO: THRU: FROM: Mark Lips, Sanitation Foreman SUBJ: New Site Plan - 2nd Review - Robert Lalane II DDS DATE: May 1, 1998 (i"'---;:-' '? ill j r~l ~ ". . ~ [f' L'.' l5 00 \:V ;~~ ~ PlANNING AND ZONING DEPT. The Public Works Department has no comments or objections for the above site plan. ML/cr~/ I ~4.- CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: FILE: NWSP 98-003 FROM: Tambri Heyden Officer R~ DATE: SUBJECT: REFERENCES: ENCLOSURES: I have no comments reference this purposed proj ect. 042798 Lalane Dental Office PZ 98-124 00 MJR 21. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 98 - 128 00 ~28. rn PLANNING AND ZONING DEPt TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning Director FROM: John A. Guidry, Utilities Director DATE: April 27, 1998 SUBJECT: New Site Plan - 2nd review Dental office for Robert Lalane We offer the following comments on this project: GENERAL COMMENTS 1) All utilities easements shall be shown on the rectified landscaping drawings so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utilities easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. LDR Sec. 7.5-18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 2) Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1500 g.p.m. as stated in LDR chap. 6, Art. , Sec. 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater. (see Sec. 26-16(a)). SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1) Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utilities easements. Please show all existing and proposed easements on the site plan drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet (for proposed easements). The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in Sec. 26-33(a) of the Code. 2) This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the certificate of occupancy. 3) The proposed fire hydrant does not provide sufficient coverage for the proposed phase 2 dental lab. We suggest the hydrant be properly located with phase 1 so as to avoid relocation in the future. LDR chap. 6, Article IV, Sec. 16 requires that all points on each commercial building be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. 4) Show existing and proposed sewer services to the site. 5) A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this office has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to serve the project. (Sec. 26-15) Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella (375-6404) of this office. JAG/PVM Xc: Skip Milor Peter Mazzella File 3-17-1998 1; O.1.PM FROM LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE 561 495 969.1. P.1 LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT 13081 Military Trail Delray Beach, Florida 33484 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL "F ~ ; ",1~ f-V off'CL ~ ~VJSf' FIRM: 's-- ft-C(<i( "\.~to(~ v-lQ-Y~ c. ~. kr c- ~ 6 ->( "'- Lo-v-. f3.~~...L..- DATE: ATIN: CI1Y: 13. ~ . TELEPHONE NUMBER: S-lR r - 31 S",.. 1, 'd-S'1 FAX NUMBER: FROM: ShaughnJ. Webb TELEPHONE NUMBER; (561) 737-3835 OR 498-5363 FAX NUMBER: (S61) 495.9&94 This transmittal consists of '\" v..) 0 ('dJ pages, including this page. If you do not receive all of the pages, or if there are any problems, please call. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Re: \' e (k ~ ~oY\ ~ -\t~~ {"r\ ,.~ This facsimile may contain confidential information and is intended only for the addressee Ii~ed above. If you are not the intended r~ipient, any review, dissemination, disclosure Or copying of this transmittal may be prohibited by law. If you have received this fax by mi5take, please notify uS immedlately. Thank you. ~'88 ill ~OW~rni! ,n / i ~: / .. f 9 1998 LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT "-...../ i; i 13081 MILITARY TRAIL DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33484 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPI March 17, 1998 Tambri J. Heyden, AICP Director Planning and Zoning City of Boynton Beach P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Subject: Technical Review Committee Meeting - March 17, 1998 Robert A. Lalane II, D.M.D. Location: 2521 S. Federal Highway Dear Ms. Heyden: The above referenced project is located outside of the L WDD service area. As always, we thank you for being given the opportunity to comment. Sincerely, LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT ~~ Chief Inspector SJW:kjr c: Ronald L. Crone, Assistant Manager Boy tech. rev Delray Beach & Boca Raton (561) 498-5363. Boynton Beach & West Palm Beach (561) 737-3835 . Fax (561) 495-9694 Board of Supervisors C. Stanley Weaver Kermit Dell John I. Witworth III Secretary/Manager William G. Winters Assistant Manager Ronald L. Crone Anomey Perry & Schone, P.A. DI::VELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 98-124 TO: FROM: Larry Roberts, Public Works Director/City Engineer Mike Haag, Building Division Steve Gale, Fire Marshal Pete Mazzella, Utility Department Ofc. Robert Riggle, Police Department John Wildner, Park Superintendent Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Ken Hall, Engineering Division Tambri J. Heyden, AICP pcfJ- Planning & Zoning Director DATE: April 15, 1998 SUBJECT: New Site Plan - 2nd Review Project: Robert Lalane II, DDS (new dental office Location: 2521 S. Federal Highway Agent: Michael Corbett File No.: NWSP 98-003 Attached is the amended site plan submittal for the above referenced project for your final review and recommendation. Please review this amended site plan submittal to determine if the plans have been adjusted to satisfy the comments previously made by your department. If your comments have been satisfied or if your comments can be met at time of building permit, please advise this office in writing. If your comments have not been met, please indicate this in writing to my office. Finally, include in your memorandum a recommendation as to whether the project should be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board for consideration. Please return your memorandum and the amended plans (Building and Engineering Divisions shall keep their plans) to Planning and Zoning by 5:00 P.M. on Friday April 24, 1998. If you should have any questions regarding this plan, please feel free to call Scott Barber at Extension 6260, who is coordinating the review of this project. T JH:bme Attachment cc: (Memo only) Bulent Kastarlak, Director of Development Marshall Gage, Police Department John Guidry, Utilities Department William Bingham, Fire Department Don Johnson, Building Division Sebastian Puda, Engineering Division Central File J:\SHRDA T A\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Robert Lalane\NWSP\2NDREVIEW-PLANS.doc uEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 98-066 TO: FROM: Kerry Willis, City Manager Bulent Kastarlak, Director of Development Steve Gale, Fire Marshal Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Ofc. Robert Riggle, Police Department Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Dept. Chief Field Insp. Don Johnson, Building Division Sebastian Puda, Engineering Division Larry Roberts, Public Works Director/City Engineer John Wildner, Parks Superintendent John Yeend, Engineering Divisi9n Tambri J. Heyden, AICP~ Planning & Zoning Director DATE: March 2, 1998 RE: SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES 1 ST Review - New Site Plan Project - Robert A. Lalane II, DMD (new dental office) Location - 2521 S. Federal Highway Agent - Michael Corbett File No. - NWSP 98-003 Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Please review the plans and exhibits and transmit formal written comments to me no later than 5:00 P.M. on March 17. 1998. When preparing your comments, please separate them into two categories; code deficiencies with code sections referenced and recommendations that you believe will enhance the project. Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval: 1. Use the review standards specified in Part IV, Land Development Regulations, Site Plan Review and the applicable code sections of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments. 2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete, however, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the reviewer by contacting Scott Barber. Page 2 Robert A. Lalane, DMD TO: TRC Members RE: Planning and Zoning Memo PZ 98-066 3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the documents. 4. Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with other departmental improvements. 5. When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review specified. 6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memorandum, within the time frame stated above, to me. The memorandum shall state that the plans are approved and that they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and that they recommend the project be forwarded through the approval process. All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted to me for distribution to the applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memorandum. Scott Barber will be the Planning and Zoning staff member coordinating the review of the project. Planning and Zoning staff will send the applicant a cover letter which includes the comment(s) and directions to amend the plans to comply with the comments and the procedures for resubmission. When Planning and Zoning staff receives the amended plans, we will distribute the plans with a cover memorandum to all TRC Members for review and approval. T JH:bme Attachment XC: (Memo Only) William Bingham, Fire Chief Marshall Gage, Police Chief John Guidry, Utilities Director Central File s:\Projects\Robert Lalane\NWSP 1 streview-pians