REVIEW COMMENTS
,I I
TRACKING LOG - SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL
PROJECT TITLE:
DESCRIPTION/
TYPE:
DATE RECIO:
L~lt,5e_ G.",\1e
NEW SITE PLAN
AMOUNT:
~e,<)~LFILE NO.: rJ IS-
MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION
'750 ,CJ) RECEIPT NO.:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
TWELVE (12) SETS
SUBMITTED: ~
(Plans shall be pre-assembled. The Planning & Zoning Dept. will number each
sheet of their set. The Planning Dept. set will be used to check the
remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match.)
AESTHETIC REVIEW ~JPL.
RECEIPT NO. : tJ, A-
I
COLORED ELEVATIONS
REC'D: r'\,J::)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
APPLICATION & SUBMITTAL:
DATE:
ACCEPTED
~D
DATE:
c2),;Js/93
I '
1./1S /9 ~
DATE OF LETTER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES:
2nd SUBMITTAL ~/~
DATE: ~ DATE:
DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER: ~q3
REVIEWER I S NAME: Iho-"D ('f\wY'e..
DENIED
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
(Label TRC Departments on each set of plans)
DATE AND MEMO NUMBER OF MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW.
DATE SENT:
tJ lojCf3
RETURN DATE:
:;2/:;'S /13
, ,
MEMO NUMBER: 13 - 0;.1
1st REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED
. Util. iPLANS rr-OdJ
. P . W . ~ .. bf3 /
. Parks .- /
. Fire '1 :3 -J./b I
I Police +- ~ 1- 071'>/
TYPE OF ~ARIANCE(S)
PLANS
MEMO #
/ DATE I "C"
I 2-2.S-~13 / ~
I 3-/-95 I~
I~/~
/~/~
Planning
Building
Engineer
,Forester
*=
DATE OF MEETING:
DATE OF LETTER SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS: ~3
(Aesthetic Review App., dates of board mtgs. & checklist sent out w/ comments)
NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID:
DATE 12 COMPLETE SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW:
(Must be assembled. Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents)
COLORED ELEVATIONS
REC'D:
AESTHETIC REVIEW APP. FEE:
RECID: RECEIPT NO.:
MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM 2nd REVIEW.
DATE SENT: MEMO #:
RETURN DATE:
2nd REVIEW RECOMMENDATION/DENIAL
PLANS MEMO # / DATE /"R/D" PLANS MEMO # I DATE /"R/D"
Util. / / Planning I /
P.W. / / Building / /
Parks / I Engineer / /
Fire / / Forester / /
Police I I
LETTER TO APPLICANT REGARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS
PLACED AT THE PROPERTY DATE SENT/SIGNS INSTALLED:
SCHEDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD
CC/CRA
DATE APPROVAL LETTER SENT:
. .
,
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-
- ;JL (./ (j'\) r
--. I! t?<
~. IV '--'
fff'rlicl
? /II, f. t1I
to
.:;. L;V.N6.~'~tV
TO: Christopher Cutro
Planning & Zoning Director
737 - '-760,"
FROM: Vincent A. Finizio
Deputy City Engineer
...,-oi/J 8, C.'i/..)'itl~:'Jb,.) /l./4r
/..k- /\..lISe-Os LJb'2.!- .Ilc:/2. /I'\. PLtivJ
/ P::::.12 '7) . IT j/ R I,) /2.. ',-0 SV!.J m nTh".,
4<?7 i:'Vt)f:::~ jJ/I~(
DATE: March 12, 1993
RE: Technical Review Committee Comments
Lighthouse Grille
On Street Parking Recommendation(s)
Please consider this memorandum a supplement to the original
Technical Review Committee comments previously provided to your
office. I ask that this document be provided to the applicant and
the City's Boards during consideration of the above referenced
project.
During the review of the Lighthouse Grille project, it has become
apparent that there are many similarities between this facility
and the Banana Boat Restaurant relative to the volume of necessary
parking and total number of seats.
As a result of the reduced number of required parking stalls in
the Central Business District, the Lighthouse Grille has provided
approximately 72 parking stalls for a restaurant whose seating
capacity exceeds 250 seats, therefore, it is practical to conclude
that based upon the isolated nature of this site from adjacent
improved rights-of-ways and parking facilities, that the noted
valet parking system will result in vehicles being parked over bare
ground within the undeveloped Boynton Beach Blvd. rights-of-way.
This type of parking is not environmentally sound in nature and
furthermore would constitute a violation of City codes, reference
Chapter 5, Article X, "Boynton Beach Parking Lot Regulations".
In order to minimize negative impacts on the environment, abate
unconfined emissions (blowing sand or dust), ensure the public's
safety, health and welfare relative to a safe environment in which
to park their motor vehicles and negate the possibility of continuous
and prolonged code enforcement actions against a restaurant with
on-site parking clearly not representative of the actual number of
motor vehicles which will visit this site, I strongly recommend that
the applicant consider developing the unimproved portion of SR 804,
east of Federal Highway, which will ultimately result in the generation
of 125 to 150 angled parking stalls.
This recommendation is based upon the conclusion that a 250t seat
restaurant and the depicted 100 boat slip dockage, will generate
visiting motorists in numbers far in excess of the number of parking
stalls (72) shown on the submitted plans.
Should you require any additional information and/or possibly
conceptual plans depicting a new downtown redevelopment project,
reference this recommendation, please do not hesitate to contact
me at ext. 488.
~A~'
Vincent A. Finizio~
VAF/ck
RECE\VED
~~R , 2 1993
cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
w. Richard Staudinger, P.E., City Engineer
Scott Blasie, Code Enforcement Admin. via Ed Hillery, Police Chief
: ~,
rJlAN/JiiVG DEPT"
.'---- .
;L~~ ~
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMORANDUM
TO:
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
A1 Newbold, Deputy Building Official
William Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Lt. Don Thrasher, Police Department
John Wi1dner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Mike Kazunas, Utilities Engineer
Vincent Finizio, Engineering Department
Richard Staudinger, Gee & Jenson Consulting Engineers
FROM:
Dorothy Moore, Zoning & Site Plan Reviewer
DATE:
March 2, 1993
RE:
Technical Review Canmittee Meeting
Thursday, March 11, 1993
Please be advised that the Technical Review Committee will meet on
Thursday, March 11, 1993, at 9:00 A.M. in Conference Room "c" (West
Wing) to discuss the following:
MASTER PLAN - RESUBMISSION
PROJECT NAME: Boynton Seacrest (f.k.a. Cedar Grove)
A Planned Residential Community
LOCATION: South Seacrest Boulevard
APPLICATION: Julian Bryan III
FILE NO. Planning Department File #697
NOTE:
Please return all comments and plans
distributed for this resubmission
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT no later than
Tuesday, March 16, 1993.
previous1ji
to the
5:00 p.m.
Technical Review Committee
Page 2
WAIVER - SIDEWALK
PROJECT:
Clifton Homes, Inc.
LOCATION:
905 S.E. 3rd Street
APPLICANT:
Philip A. Binns
FILE NO.:
Planning Department File #728
DESCRIPTION:
Requesting a waiver of a requirement for a sidewalk
at this location.
NOTE:
Please coordinate review of plans and submission of
written comments with BUILDING DEPARTMENT c/o Al
Newbold.
DISCUSSION
1. Review of the following site plans for inter-departmental
conflicts:
a. Lighthouse Grille Restaurant
b. Red Lobster Restaurant
c. 610 Industrial Avenue
~~~J
Dorothy Moore
DM/jm
Att.
cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
City Commission (5)
Don Jaeger, Building Official
Ed Allen, Fire Chief
Charles Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director
Edward Hillery, Police Chief
John Guidry, Utilities Director
Steve Campbell, Fire Department
Bob Gibson, Public Works
Central File
Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
Tambri Heyden, Senior Planner
Mike Haag, Zoning and Site Development Administrator
Project File
Chronological File
A: TRCAGDA.JM
?yO~e(+ ~,'l ~
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-029
TO:
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
Vince Finizio, Admin. Coordinator of Engineering
Richard Staudinger, Gee & Jenson
Al Newbold, Deputy Building official
Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Michael Kazunas, utilities Engineer
Lt. Don Thrasher, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
r' ~ <:vJ-,.::.-..
cniiStopher cutro, Planning & zoning Director
FROM:
DATE:
February 10, 1993
RE:
SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES
New Site
Project
Location
Plan
- Lighthouse Grille Restaurant
Boynton Beach Boulevard and west
Intracoatal
- Janet Hall
- 715
side of
Applicant
File No.
Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above
referenced project. site Plan Review approval for this project
will be granted by the City Commission. To ensure that the project
stays on line with the review time frame, I request that the plans
and exhibits be reviewed and formal comments transmitted to the
Director of the planning and Zoning Department no later than 5:00
P.M. on February 25, 1993.
Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a
comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain
Technical Review Committee approval:
1. Use the review standards specified in Part III, Land
Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Site plan Review, section
8 to review and formulate comments. (See planning
& Zoning Department memo #92-020)
2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be
substantially complete based on the submittal requirements
identified in section 7 of the site Plan Review ordinance.
However, if the data provided to meet the submittal
requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process
the project based on the review standards, additional data
should be requested by the reviewer through the planning and
Zoning Department.
To: TRC Members
Re: Planning & Zoning Memo, 93-29
Page Two of Two
3. Each comment shall reference the code section and include the
language of the submittal requirements and review standards
that require the data to be submitted for review.
4. Technical Review Committee member (s) shall identify in their
comments when the plans depict or when the location and
installation of their departmental required improvements may
conflict with other departmental improvements.
5. When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of
his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code
section may be included in their review comments with the name of
the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review
specified.
6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward
the plans and a memo, within the time frame stated above, to the
Planning and Zoning Director stating that the plans are approved
and they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for
review.
All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted to the Director
of the Planning and Zoning Department for distribution to the
applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer
on this memo. Dotty Moore will be the Planning and Zoning Department
staff member coordinating the review of the project.
The Planning and Zoning Department will send to the applicant a cover
letter which includes the comment(s) and directions to amend the plans
to comply with the comments and the procedures for resubmission. When
the Planning and Zoning Department receives the amended plans, they
will distribute the plans with a cover memo to all TRC Members for
review and approval.
Attachment
xc: (Memo Only)
Don Jaeger, Building Official
Ed Allen, Fire Chief
Charlie Frederick, Parks & Recreation Director
Edward Hillery, Police Chief
John GUidry, utilities Director
Project File
Chronological File
A:IREVIEW.WP5