Loading...
LEGAL APPROVAL ORDINANCE NO. 095-/6 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, REGARDING THE LAWRENCE OAKS-ORIOLE, INC., PROPERTY (42 ACRES OF PROPERTY AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LAWRENCE ROAD AND KNOLLWOOD ROAD) AMENDING ORDINANCE 91-70 OF SAID CITY BY REZONING CERTAIN TRACTS OF LAND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, FROM RS-SE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WITH SPECIAL EXCEPTION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PALM BEACH COUNTY) TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CITY); AMENDING THE REVISED ZONING MAP ACCORDINGLY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida has adopted Ordinance No. 91-70, in which a Revised Zoning Map was adopted for said City; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Boynton i '! Beach, Florida, in accordance with the Annexation Program, is simultaneously herewith adopting an Ordinance annexing certain property; and il WHEREAS, the City of Boynton Beach, in connection with [I aforesaid Annexation Program, has heretofore filed a Petition, ;1 'I pursuant to Section 9 of Appendix A-Zoning, of the Code of Ordinances, City of Boynton Beach, Florida, for the purpose of rezoning certain property consisting of 42 acres located adjacent to the municipal limits of said City, said land being more particularly described hereinafter, from RS-SE Single Family Residential with Special Exception for Planned unit Development (Palm Beach County) to Planned Unit Development (City), which requests that the 42 acres be removed from the boundaries of the RS-SE zone to allow for the processing of the rezoning application; Ii WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it in the best Ii I interests of the inhabitants of said City to amend the I aforesaid Revised Zoning Map as hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT: Section 1: The following described land, located in the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, to-wit: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" be and the same is hereby rezoned from RS-SE (County) to Planned Unit Development (City). A location map is attached hereto as Exhibit liB" and made a part of this Ordinance by reference. Section 2: That the aforesaid Revised Zoning Map of the City shall be amended accordingly. A oertain parcel of land being a portion of Trac~& 10, 11, 14, 1) and 16 of t.he Subdivision of t:hg SouthQast o.uarlgr of section 12, TOWM9hip 45 So~th. RanqA 42 ~.C~, ac ~.ccr~.d in Plet Book 9, Psg- 74 of the Public:: P.caeordc of Pa]JJ\ B.aoh Ccun'ty, Florida;, sa14 pa~oel ~eing more particularly deegr1bed ~~ fQl1owa: Commencing at the southeCl.s-t corner of t~he southeas't ,one ql.'l:n;t(l!~ of Sectton 1.2; t:hl!'!nce south &9-33.37" wt!Glt along the Sc>uth llIll!: of section 1.2 t a distance of 40.04 fuet., to eo point along tbe illest Rlgh't-of-way line of Lawrenc@ ~Oddi thence North 0260Z'59" East, along said West Right- of-Way linQ, a distanee of l!.Ol feet to a point on the south line of the aforesaid Tract 16 and the Point ot aeginninq: t'heI1C~ Sont:h 89D33'37" West along the Sout.h line or said Tracts 16, 10. 11, 12 an~ 1), a distance of 2149.52 feet: 1:0 the Southwest corner of said Trac-e 13; thence North 04"00'28" East along ~he l~.~t. line of s'lid Traot 13. a distance of 1]34.39 ~QO~ to ~h. No~we5t corner of sa id T:rac1: 1.3; i:hgncQ Norlb 6904 a J l.~" East along the North 11n,. of said Tract 13, t.l distance of 351.25 fOQt to a point on tee boundary ot Plat NO. 2f Manor For~ct, as r*-oQrdeQ'in Plftt aOOK 41, pages 88 and g9 r Pu.blic Records of Pam Beach county I Ylorida; i:hen~@ along gaid boundary of Plat 110. 2, ManOl;' Forest, fot' the next fif~een (l~) described lines being South 82024'49" East, a dista.nce at' 123.71 feet to a point along the Wast Ri911t.-of-wai- lint;! of Manor Forest Boulevard~ said point lying on a curve concave to th* Sou.t:hea!lt. h"\ring a cen~ral angle of 70012'00" and a radius of 410.00 feet. and -,.;hose chord bears Sotlt:h 05025# 20" Wo~t; 1:hQnoe alon':J the ~rc of said curve, a d.'.1.stance of 502.34 feet 1:0 'the pO int of compol.lnd cU%itatur2 of '" cu.rv4l! conc:ave to tIle Nort:hg;:lst having 1') central aTl91e of Oc;o13"OO" and a radiu!;; of 1275.00 feet and ~hoso;@ chm:'q bears south 32047' 1011 East; tho-nee SQ~tho.<)ete%"ly olo.t19 tbe arc of , I said c\n.'Ve, ~ di~t:ance or 13R.34 feet: 1:bencQ Nnrt:b ~~.05'20" Ea!=t, 3 di$t?n~!": of 75.00 :e~~t. to ~ point alotlg the arc of tJ. curve havinq a egntral angle of 108<:11'7'39lt and a ::-adi\:ls of 90.00 feet; 'tb9nCQ Sou'thea:Jt- ~rly ,~long thq a::c of o;aid tUl:VQ, 41 di.lilt:anC1~ of 170.11 feet 'to a ~oLl]t of reverSQ cu:t'vaturg; E;,aid t:urve having a c~ntJ:al angle cf 8U"15'22" .:lnd u radlos Q~ 210.00 teet; t:bencp- N(>ttbei,sterJ y, along the ~o of said. curve, a uistallCQ of 294.15 foot to ~ point of eOl'!'1pounl1 cu.'tVatu.!"ej said curve baving a c;.'!on~t"l tU1gJ..~ of 120. 4~' non and a radius of 1.~!L 00 f~Qt:; 't:henc@ sout:heasterly aJ.ong the arc of said cu~vo, ~ dis~cnc~ o~ 347.14 roe~ ~o a point of reve~G9 curvature, ~aid c\U~~ having a central angle of :2J4CtO';'41." and a radi.us elf 90.00 teet; ~henee South~rly <<nd Nor-ther1l along the arc: of said ~r.;e, a distance of 367.74 feet to a point of reverse cUrv~d::ure; said clttVe hoving a c~trdl angle of ,\4 0 00' 00" and a t.adiuc of 120.00 t~e~; thence .N~rth~as~erly a]~nQ ~hQ arQ of said cu.rve a di stance of 92.15 feet 1:0 a poini:: of r."VerG~ curvature; said Cllr'\ie having ~ central. angle of 8p615'37" and a racHus of 60 .teet; t.hane. B02:l:..heact::erly Blong t:he arc of said carve, a distance of 62.05 teet to a point ot reverse curva.turel s~i.d ClU"VQ htAving a eent~a.1 angle or 37047rSO" 811d a redills of 2.:35.00 f'~e't., ,t:hence North~est- ~rly along the ar~ of eaid eu~ve, a distance o~ 148.43 feet t:o a I)otnt of rgver!le cU:t-.rature; said curve having a cent,ral :ln91~ of 77fOll'40" ana a ralj11.lS or 75.00 feCIt; tht;!nc~ NOl"thw~c:t~rly e.l<:Jnq the arc 01: sald curve, a distan~~ o~ 10J.05 feet to a point ot rave~se curvature; so:aid <'ur~e h~ vin9 a central a.ngle of SO 029'50" and a radi1.1$ of :1.90.00 'feet; t:h~nc~ Ncrthvte~terly ~long the arc of said curv~, a dlstanc~ of 252.89 fe~t to a point of re"Ve1;"se cu..t-vature; said curve having a :::ent.raJ. anglQ of 15"41"\0" and a radius of 210.00 fQgti thenCe Nort.hQag~- erly along I;.he ar~ of sClid curye, a dlstancQ of 57.52 feet; thenc-e south 87017'3811 East, a di::tanoe of 260.00 feet to a point on thQ tast lin~ of thg a!'()re3nid Tract 10i thence South 02~42'22" We~tt aloug -:h~ Ee.st: line of s~id!':r.act 10; a dist::.nce ot' 452. 15 ~~ei; to the Northwest ccrnQr of .the afcra~~id Tr~ct lG; thence North 89840'50" East 21.ong thQ l10rtll 11tlQ Qr said Tra.:t 16, a dista!lCe of 682. '-4 f~et t.o ~ p(~int 011 the ~legt 'Righl:-ot-lfay line of Lawrenc/Q RO:'.ld; ~ h-anc'i! SOl.lth 02" 02' 59 ,. We~;t a long the West Right.-r:,f-Hay line of La~'T'!!nce Roadl a a1st:.allCe of 653.85 f~gt to th~ Point of Beginning. ;1 ;I II I I I :i I ORDINANCE NO. 095-/~ ,I AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, REGARDING THE LAWRENCE OAKS-ORIOLE, INC., PROPERTY (42 ACRES OF PROPERTY AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LAWRENCE ROAD AND KNOLLWOOD ROAD)AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-38 OF SAID CITY BY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY BY ADOPTING THE PROPER LAND USE OF CERTAIN PROPERTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREINAFTER; SAID LAND DESIGNATION IS BEING CHANGED FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL 5 (PALM BEACH COUNTY) TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (CITY); PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Boynton i : Beach, Florida has adopted a Comprehensive Future Land Use 'i ! Plan and as part of said Plan a Future Land Use Element by Ordinance No. 89-38 in accordance with the Local Government Comprehensive Planning Act; and WHEREAS, certain property more particularly described hereinafter is being annexed by the City in accordance with the application completed by the City for the owner of the following property, pursuant to the Annexation Program, by Ordinance being adopted simultaneously herewith; :i and WHEREAS, the procedure for amendment of a Future Land Use Element of a Comprehensive Plan as set forth in Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, has been followed; and WHEREAS, after public hearing and study, the City Commission deems it in the best interest of the inhabitants of " I said City to amend the aforesaid Element of the Comprehensive :i Plan as adopted by the City herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT: Section 1: Ordinance No. 89-38 of the City is hereby amended to reflect the following: That the Future Land Use of the following described land shall be designated as low density residential. Said land is more particularly described as follows: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" Section .2: 'luac any maps adopted in accordance with the Future Land Use Element of said Comprehensive Plan shall be amended accordingly. Section 3: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 4: Should any section or provision of this A certain parcel of land being a portion of TraC~R 10, 11, 1~, 13 a.nd 16 of the Subdivision of t:hg Sou~hg.ast. Q.l1arl9r of Sect-ion 12, Town$hip 45 South. RanqQ d2 Eact, .c ~.co~d.d in ~let Book 9, Page 14, of the Public:: Rcaeordc of Palm Beach County, Florida;, said. parcel reing mor. particu13;rl~" C1eeoribed t!l8 follows: Commencing at t.he soucheas-t corner of -the soutbeas1; .one. qu:&~~e~ o~ Seet:.ien 1.2; ~henc@ South &9-:33'37" W@Glt along the South 11Ile: 'Of section 1~, a distance of 40.04 foet., to eo point along tbe l'lest Rlgh't-of-way 1in.e of La~rmc~ ~Oddi thence North 02.0~'59'. Eas'C, along sud West R1.9bt. of-Way 11nQt a distance ot 15.01 feet to a point on the Sour~ line ot ~he aforesaid Tract 16 and the Point of Begirminq: thence South 89033'37" wt!!St:. along th. Sout.h line or said Tracts 16, 10. 11, 12 and 13, a distance of 2149.52 feel.: 1:0 the ScuthwQst corner of said Tl:act 13; t.heno;;;e North 0401100'22" East alal1q the ~..~-t. linea of s~id " Traot 13. a distance of 1134.39 tQG~ to tho No~weet corner of said Traci 13; thonQQ Norlh a904eI1~" East along the l~orth linea of said Tract 13, t.l distance 01' 351. 25 fcu~t to a poin'\: on tee boundary of Plat N~. 2, Manor rorcac~, as r__oorded'in Pl~t &OQ~ 41, pages 88 and B9 I Pu.blic Reoord~ of Palm Beach county, l"lorida; then<=~ along said boundary of Plat NO.2, ManOl" Forest, fot' the next fifteen (l~) described lines being South 82024'49" El!st, i1 distance o:f 123.71 :feet to a point along the "'last Ri91lt-or-ws)' J.in." of Manor Forest Boulevard; said point lyi.ng on a curve concave to thtt Sou-t;.heast. ha..,ing a cen't.ral angle of 70012'00" and a radius of 410.00 feet. and .Nhose chord bears Sotlth 05025'20" ~OSlt; i:ho.noe along the ~rc of said curve, a distance of 502.34 fee~ ~o ~h8 point of compollnd curvature o'f a QUrv.. ooneave to the Northe;;ist having ~ central. an9~Q of 0C;013 "00" and Ii rad ius of 127 S . 00 feet and ,-,hQse oh<'t:"a bears Sou~h 32047' lO" Ectst; tho-nee Southe,l)ste:t-ly along t.he arc of said Clll:"Ve, a d f st:ancQ or 13SL 34 feet: tbencQ Nnrt:b '3~"O~'2c't E~~tr :) di$t~nr.'1!!: of 7S.00 :Ee~t, to :\l point along the arc of 0. curVe havinq a centra]_ angle of 10801'7'39" and a :::'adi~s of 90.01) feet:; 'tblimco Sou~be~t'Jt- erly .:.10n9 t.11~ arc of o;aid CULV,;" .a c:li.gi::.nC1~ of 1.70.11 fe.et '':0 a poLlJt of reverse out:vatur-gi !;,aid turve baving a c~ntral ~ng.le cf 80"15' 22" :md u radius Qt 210.00 teet; t:bencR Nurtbet'ts1:et"ly. ;;JIang ~he aro of said curve, a distancliP of 294.15 foot to ~ POhl't of c;ompol.U1" cu'tVa~ure; said curve havirl9 a Qonta::'.J. tU13~. Qf 1.20"4~.r(}on and a radius of' 1E:1L 00 fAet:; thenoe Southeast..rly aJ.ong 1:hQ arc:: of gaid cu~voJ ~ di.t~nc__ o~ 347.74 roe~ ~o a point of revergo curvature; ~aid c\u~e hav1nq a central angle of 234&0;'41" and a radi.us elf 90.00 teet; t:hence Sout.h~rly ~nd Nori;herll along the arc: of said Ct;J.rve, a distance of 367.74 feet to a point of reverse c~,ture; said Cl~e h~ving a o~tral angle of 440 DO' 00" and a t-adiuc of 120.00 t~et; th~nceN~rth~as~erly a]~nQ ~hQ arQ of said curve a distance of 92.15 feet 1:0 a point: of rev.rOe curvature!- said curve having et r:..nt:ral an91. of 150015'27" and a red us of 60 leet; 'thmlce No~l:.hea.t:erly elong the arc ot sdid curve, a distance of 62.05 tae~ to a point at r~va:rse curV<lture1 said OU]:-VI;I htlvin9 III cent1:al angle or 371)47rSO" al1d a rad1.\1s of 22S.00 f'~ei:., 't:hence Nort.h'West- ~rly along th~ ar~ of caiQ curve, a distance o~ 148.43 feet t:~ a {)otnt of r';\\Ter!le mn.-ra'ture i said curve having a central an91~ of 77~11r40" an~ a ra~1us ot 75.00 feliPt; t~~nCQ N01"thw~&::t/Ol1:1y along the arc 01: sa1d curve, a dlS::tdn~~ of 101.05 ft!et to a 1-.JU:i.Il1;. u.r; teveJ';se curvat.ure; caid <,urve h~ vin9 a aentral an<;le of 80029'5091 and a radiu~ of 100.00 ~eet; th~nc~ Ncrthwesterly along the arc of ~ai~ curv~, a distance of 252.89 fe~t to a point of reverse curvature; said curve having a ::entraJ. anglQ of 15"41'.~O.' and a radius of :210.00 fQgti themcC! Nor-t:hQ;U~~- erly along I;he ar::: of s~lid curve, a dlstancQ of 57.52 feet; thenc-e South 87017'3811 East:, ~ di::tano~ of 260.00 feet to a point on thQ East lihQ of th9 a('ore~aid Tract 10; th(~nce Sotlth 02',)421"22" Wa~t( along -:h~ East line ot' s:\id!'ract 10; a dist~nce ~t' ~52. 15 ~ee-t t:.o the. Northwest cern..!" of 'the afcra!;aid Tr;ict. 16; ~hence North 89-40'50" East along thQ Hartl} lltH;~ of said Tra.::t 16, a distallce of Ei?2.:>.4 f~ei: to .<1 point Of! the r1est 'Righl:-ot-Way line of L~wrenr~~ Ro:.\d; ~h9no. South 02" 02 r 59" we!:;t along the West Ri~h~-of-Hay line of La~'-r~nce Road I a <11:St.al1Ce of' 653.85 fr.aQt ~'o the Point of B~ginninCJ. I PCN# 00_42-45-12-05-002-0010 00_42_45_12-05~00~-0000 ~:1I ..\ \ ...!1 k~\ - - -' ~,-- "~ I \ : . ....... ;:l' L \:J .. . , L 1 'IU-L- ~ .I . ~ __' ~., I .. J . ' ,'.; 0",1 u...-- ,.~_. 11, r!llc._-'p.- . "'~ . d-- ,,'-' " It--- :: '1 ill (~~._ - i'" . . ; 3. ;l.l'l!!i " " .' I , ~ .' IlfIIIJ'f .1::/: 16\ '1.. q . . .... ."",."".!'J' _ ' t \ ,'; S · ... . :, d ~~il 111"~' ~~ ;)f~'~' > _: .. ~ .,'" - : .' · ~. .r" ",~"-'. ,~c .,.;, Ii.. 'l' . "'" ....MIo'.:o... . .' d .. . \.,' . . . >r-. rt~~1l> I . Cii '_" r._~l;m.~~ _ .";.J .~; -r-;.' (:. ~(t:1 ~ ._\ ~ " : 1 ~:... .(,I.!. t,...! :.!'. '. lt~ .,J~ It'':!. 0' ._';. ",,'~~\\..ls.~~i' \ ":~~;:,"i 1..... _.. ' : Im~ p ~\] t 1'~" . D . -' · ::3: l;i~I:'lc~ : c ) .\11 .-=...' . It,/t:',-J;. ~l" m ~ I ' , ...~.!!-' .' . '. " . , !." I')'r-o-I "1\':1 . 'l';I1 ., .... --.~, ~ _ A . \It'! ;...., . .' I ~ '~;. .\ 7 ~fJ ". ;::. -' \l~~ I ..... u ' '!II' !-It t ,:.1 'iii . 7: . r .1" .'",. -' ~ ~~~-fl(" ~~g~~'t ~~." r;.. : . i~" ..::.'-.l i , 1;;:;1 -, ~ . ~ .... .. . -, -.-.. . " f'" ' , " ,. ., . I " ~ --. . -' ---" ~~ _. ~ c-:- .~. \~ ~ '!.-, . \::- .~ ,.. ..... ~;~ " 1\ i1 n. I) :il ,~ ~ . ., , ..~.~..' r. . \ )J\' ... '-_ . ~ ~ .);~. .'1'\1' J..\.'" . . -' · rr= "" lu J ilIll;" n' :1] ,~t, D~: ~,fi1-' I . ..'.. :i~.,. ~I',.!~~ d z \- U, ~\::..\ t' t;'.' I!" ~~OX % 1"\: . '" .,.' '. ";:; --... ~!II""'~" , , _ I l)' .,;;'}W.' iff'.'," ..,.' '....~.. t:; ;:"1\i;. f.;J;;I~~;l'C j ~,1--'1l1..........",", \l I'-' 1'.lO\.li! "~.. ~.::4UoAO - :\ t~~. .:\ ... I~ril ' : "I'!"\~F'!"-"-!''''''''' .- ,..' ~i"l ,.1 . \{]/ ,f" . .. l~'in-j .~,~ ..:.-r:-~~I::.~-!ii, {:.l,fU" I:.' ';;.' .... ..!,.:.. I'.' . : " 1'''-'''''' \'W-.'~i?'" ~~.;.4= \.' ~.., " :-/ici - \e \ \::L~~Xi:~-?~t ~\ ~ ~ i .::;>" !..?~"c~t;:: '.. .;,~" ' . r-' '!F1"A '1!i1i~1 \ 'p j , .. .,. .' .. .Ie'. · .' .,.. . . . Gol.AI". . ~ .,,' '..".l~"" ..-'T.'. ~ --. .I~~ ,.t':l I \ ~B: . __~?<(. 11' . . .-r.....~ ~ l"""" . . .I!:!'-- 1:" .:, 1 ,\1 ",' .1',' ..! ;;;t..... f:""'"' -'- r ,; ~!. _-\ .' rl"" . . --:-. ~: ~ i ;r.mlt: '-~-::~. · . I'"' ]" I t ~~ '12 .' '~~.;\ '.,; , 'i\J r1';1 '~'" i~'+' )~ ~ i ~~I'" rJ. . ' . ~ ~w." -r: ..:'::. ;-{:;. ;..~....~\..w 11, ~II':-'\ IJ' I . .. \' I:.' ........~ I _ _ .- " ~. _...., " [I . ..,' \;f:i<. .01 ,..0 ~ I ~ ~ MIl ,~..... ;0-"':;' .;, i. [l' ~rJi." . · I J i'tIItJ;iJ' .~l ~. ~ .. \IT\ rr.1" m . ~J" III llU !..,.l. !. l. tt'- IP..III . ,r City o' loyntoft S..ch t1.lfll'lnl D.pa"""'" ; ..: " I f r1 l J '" . 'f ! 11 . .. . . . NaJlle of De"eloplllent/owner- c.~PF/I((' r rA /:!S Locate the subj~ct property on this map and shade in the area. Ordinance or any portion thereof be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the remainder of this Ordinance. Section 5: The effective date of this Ordinance shall be the date a final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs finding this amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Chapter 163.3184, F. S. , i or the date a final order is issued by the Administration Commission finding this amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Chapter 163.3184, F.S. The notice of compliance becomes a final order 21 days following the issuance of the notice of compliance if during the 21-day period no petitions are filed challenging the amendment. Once issued, the Notice of Intent shall be ! attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made a part of this ordinance by reference. FIRST READING this /~ day of $/9~ , 1995. SECOND, ~aNG' FINAL READING and PASSAGE this dc:J day of , 1995. CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA ~-==- ~ Vlce Mayor ~ L /L r yL--'V.. { May<Z5t Pro Tern ",; /1- ~l~ Y~cL~ ATTEST: tl. .. rJ,-,~ I // 'ci~fu:k~1t. /~j~/. (Corporate Seal) lAWRENCEoAKS. lANDu;:)E 5/8/95 I ~cN* 00_42-45-12-05-002-0010 !l11r~ OO_42_4S_12-0S_006-~OOO; ~ ~:"_'\\..I \ _ 11 . ..: ~ ,~\-rt'- .- '~ I II I : ' . " ~ ~.";;.l ,'" . . ,. _ _ U [j" ,.' ,.. ,-::::i.A-. ,'" --;..: . '" j.)..: \ )j J A- ,!.J ,;, · ~ "_ JI";!!!!:!- " .. .' "'_r.~ ~;~. ....., ' 'Tn . I '- ~ ~S,I ,'!.! ""'" ~ ~---t . . II \:-;:- '~l \ '1"::~i;!I\,\1lt.l l ,,''7.: , -1 ~I tl N ' .,...' ,~ .' ,_I I '" ,:', .= """i,' _ ,\ I;:' :' : ~ ,"~'" f .' ~l & B&' . ;i;.:"- ." ., . i... ~ -," ~;",.,. ..;::>.i,. ' d~ ~ "1 ~ q \" 'M '. tl'j:c\J;i" ;;:.' ~,' ~ "L-t..\~'i~ . ~"f:'.':l' ~I~ I: d ..' "",r" _ t..--' , /::!Ir ->- w,' I ~(f\~,L:J · ~ _I~'.. ~I :\l~,r' ~- .l.t-~:;; j~' 41 -:::- " I'.' [l~ II O'1"ft: ~ IR l""O"'""" ! ... " , .. r -. ' .' 1 \ - .,J- , . ~~ .' '-~'Q])~~\ ~N' '1~~,~~:~ .~i ',y,;:~~~rl~! I ~ ' I .-:;;;: ..' ;, . ' l' It. _~.: ' )'U '", ' ~ ..~.!!-'~' ' ~ ,.... c." . ',' ,- --.", "~, (\\.\'1".'. ;." :'1 -.-lL ' E!, .:") ..:'f.Jl \ \ " ":' ~I Ii I' .1 ' ." r. ' " .' -- ~ ~ II ii:'. ,"" Tl " ,:.1'1 .-:.' r" · 1\ ".... \ il !ii' ~1l....W ~ \ \ IlO - '-",' I . ' : ~R~;'~';,.,,~ 11i'~ 1\1J ~ 1~1 ~~~~\1~iI~ .1lii: .i' . : . r..:,';:;::: .. f"~" \ i.n L" ,! ..~ .'" .' -.... ~\ =. .. ~.~~ I,~ . ~\~ '. t~~:::\ ~~ ,Ow ~ ~- II 1- ,~~~.;J ~ f\ J.~ ~.~ 1 ~11'" - ~~ -I ' ~ ~ ~~lI!"" ~'i'\Ii' ..J.~~ - " - - , ~ ~ \) d!Illll;' no ,1 l'~ ~'i'.~'i", ','..." 0" ~ · . ~ .-,-:;;J " l \1r , I\; u,l:;, q t' (:' . ".w.z "",'. '~"I" 0::......--;;:' ,~(~-';" , ~' _' l\! ~\. ., · ,t~'.\I:.'j . ',~~ ,c:; t:W~ ,fttj'F!'11 t~ _L.J j ':l ill.. . '\1Jl-~' o,~.. -!!l!:.."...... ~~.;.. ,", ... ,'if! .. lt7J.\;lrv.;6.~~.~~'~c:"'~'S\CdC"':, ~ !JII'~~ '-~ .1.' -;,h' "~ Ii \ \ IIf:_<;:i::..-~'~ ' \ ::~ ,~j!l'!:'::/. ~,' ~\~, 11{f~'7~~,:::,~~ii'It'r ~:. ' · " ' ~ \.""J\:j":\."W~ . I ;,p') · ., . ~ :.' ~~ I' , -~, . , ., . . ' ...' '1l'" ..:..., ,.., ,..1:'.. 'l<'" " ,-.~ ~:t', , , ; "",' =C<1i\~' ,~(~.....' .0;<", !a-~:.~J: (.~'::'-fr1 'tt1.1\f, <~'~;~"l~'~ 1;,'. > : qJ~~ l\~.~~ ~ '<:j '!\\ll( II ~(~:~:~~~;: ~t: ~.",'~ ;.,r~ ,~,t!i" 71\- \' . rrm"..... ~ .: \ \ \ 1 ~,1''''''''''' . -i1 "c "'... (.~- : ~ I b', ''""I ~ -,' · .-' Ii'~'"'' . . ' \ij \!r - ~ ~~?~~ ~\:.;, ,: "f;J&wII ;~::-:\!' " _ _' rm ~ .nt' il:~Y.). :.~J ;r.~~1I11 J .... ., ~~"m' '.. · ; ~A . t. J;Lm . · ~ \I ,\,\111 ;;;;..! , ..-~ ~j. 1. 1. 1- , " ,P" ,.' CII., .1 ....... ..... t!1'lt'\I\I oeparU"I"\ Name of peve lopll\en t/O>lner.-01../ f r'tl{ C r". nA I!S Locate the sub1~ct property on thiS maP and shade in the area. ------------------- .-_._.~_._---,.-"'.~ : Section 3: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in II conflict herewith are hereby repealed. ;, Section 4: Should any section or provision of this i Ordinance or any portion thereof be declared by a court of " i, ! competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the remainder of this Ordinance. Section 5: This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon passage. FIRST READING this /~ day of #//9~ SECOND, FINAL READING and PASSAGE this 0UA/6 , 1995. , 1995. de::::.' day 0 f FLORIDA ,I i :l Sh^~ ~ Vice ~'ayor 6" . ~ ,.~ t _-{ - ' ' .:-- - l' YV~_ -.t _ J, ;l...A- MaycJ} Pro Tem v /'1 i ATTEST: I~ ~~ ICi~k I I (Corporate Seal) LawrenceOaks. Rezoning.5/9/95 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JUNE 20, 1995 T- to do this. Commissioner Rosen requested that the workshop include discussion of the formation of a task force on industrial development. Mayor Pro Tern Matson pointed out that since economic development will be an integral part of the visioning process, it might be more appropriate to include this topic as part of the visioning. Commissioner Rosen agreed, and withdrew his request. X. LEGAL: A. Ordinanc - 2nd Reading: !)!'8L1C HEARING 1. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-14 Re: Annexation - Lawrence Oaks- Oriole Inc. Property .............................................................. TABLED 2. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-15 Re: land Use Element - lawrence Oaks - Griole Inc. Property ....................................................... TABLED 3. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-16 Re: Rezoning - Lawrence Oaks - Oriole Inc. Property .._.............................................................. TABLED City Manager Parker advised that the agreement with the County has not yet been drafted, and will take several more weeks. However, we have a deadline with DCA to move forward with the annexations. The recommendation is to move forward, and staff will continue to work on the agreement. Motion Mayor Pro Tem Matson moved to remove these items from the table. Vice Mayor Bradley seconded the motion which carried unanimously. Attorney Cherof read Proposed Ordinances Nos. 095-14, 095-15, and 095-16 by title only. C~HE;E ~A;-~O ONE~RESENT W~O WISHED TO S;;'AK ATTHE P~;L;~~~ -- - Motion -~~'---"- Commissioner Jaskiewicz moved to approve Proposed Ordinances Nos. 095-14, 095-15, and 095-16 on second and final reading. Mayor Pro Tem Matson seconded the motion. City Clerk Sue Kruse polled the vote. The vote was unanimous. 23 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JUNE 20, 1995 -1- to do this. Commissioner Rosen requested that the workshop include discussion of the formation of a task force on industrial development. Mayor Pro Tem Matson pointed out that since economic development will be an integral part of the visioning process, it might be more appropriate to include this topic as part of the visioning. Commissioner Rosen agreed, and withdrew his request. x. lEGAL: A. Ordinances - 2nd Reading: PUBLIC HEARING 1. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-14 Re: Annexation -lawrence Oaks- Oriole Inc. Property .............................................................. TABLED 2. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-15 Re: land Use Element - lawrence Oaks - C>riole Inc. Property ....................................................... TABLED 3. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-16 Re: Rezoning - lawrence Oaks - Oriole Inc. Property ............................................... .................... TABLED City Manager Parker advised that the agreement with the County has not yet been drafted, and will take several more weeks. However, we have a deadline with DCA to move forward with the annexations. The recommendation is to move forward, and staff will continue to work on the agreement. Ii I j Motion Mayor Pro T em Matson moved to remove these items from the table. Vice Mayor Bradley seconded the motion which carried unanimously. Attorney Cherofread Proposed Ordinances Nos. 095-14, 095-15, and 095-16 by title only. THERE WAS NO ONE PRESENT WHO WISHED TO SPEAK AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. Motion Comm issioner Jaskiewicz moved to approve Proposed Ordinances Nos. 095-14, 095-15, and 095-16 on second and final reading. Mayor Pro Tem Matson seconded the motion. City Clerk Sue Kruse polled the vote. The vote was unanimous. 23 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA \ MAY 16, 1995 L IJ /11< - 1 11 - 0 JI the vote. The vote was unanimous. 4. Proposed Ordinance No. 09514- I nc. Property Proposed Ordinance No. 095-15 Oriole Inc. Property Proposed Ordinance No. 095-16 Inc., Property Re: Lan Use Element - Lawrence Oaks - ;' I Re: Rkzoning - lawrence Oaks - Oriole Re: Annexa' n - Lawrence Oaks - Oriole 5. 6. Attorney Cherof read Proposed Ordinances Nos. 095-14, 095-15 and 095-16 by title only. Motion Vice Mayor Bradley moved to approve Proposed Ordinances Nos. 095-14, 095-15, and 095-16 on first reading. Commissioner Rosen seconded the motion. City Clerk Sue Kruse polled the vote. The vote was unanimous. 8. 9. 7. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-17 Condominium Property Proposed Ordinance No. 095-18 Condominium Property Proposed Ordinance No. 095-19 Condominium Property Re: Rezoning - Carriage Gate Re: Annexation - Carriage Gate Re: land Use Element - Carriage Gate Attorney Cherof read Proposed Ordinances Nos. 095-17, 095-18 and 095-19 by title only. Motion Mayor Pro Tem Matson moved to approve Proposed Ordinances Nos. 095-17, 095-18, and 095- 19 on first reading. Vice Mayor Bradley seconded the motion. City Clerk Sue Kruse polled the vote. The vote was unanimous. C. Resolutions: 1 . Proposed Resolution No. R95-65 Re: Authorize execution of agreement between the City of Boynton Beach and Howard Scharlin, Trustee for Woolbright Place, Joint Venture (Tradewinds) ............................... TABLED Motion Mayor Pro Tem Matson moved to take C-1 off the table. Vice Mayor Bradley seconded the motion 37 MINUTES - CITY CC.USS~ ...4 MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 17, 1995 .k~J t;I" ' t r& <' ,%~6'~~< O. Project Narne: Owner: location: Annexation - Lawrence Oaks lawrence Oaks - Oriole Homes, Inc. 42 acres at the northwest corner of Lawrence Road and Knollwood Road land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning: Request to show annexed land as Low Density Residential and to rezone from RS-SE (Single Family Residential - Special Exception) in Palm Beach County to PUO (Planned Unit Development) Ms. Heyden stated that lawrence Oaks is a County approved project. It received site plan approval by the County in 1993 and was recently platted. In June of 1994, the City authorized execution of an agreernent for water and sewer service, with the condition that the owners would volunteer to be annexed into the City. Following the recent annexation of the Knollwood Groves property, the subject property became contiguous and therefore eligible for annexation. This project consists of 178 units designed as zero lot line patio homes. Staff had provided an analysis of the zoning issues of that particular approval and how it compares to the City. Oriole Homes began construction of the site improvements approxi- mately six months ago. They are the current owners. lowell Homes is the contract purchaser. They are the ones wha will be pulling the building penmits. The City is currently negotiating with the County regarding how the property will be inspected and permitted once it becomes annexed. The providers of major urban services (Fire, Police,.and Public Works) evaluated ~ this property for annexation. It is within the service area of Fire Station 3, which has superior service capability compared to the corresponding County sta- tion. No deficiences are expected upon annexation or anticipated in the near future. Description: Ms. Heyden reviewed the existing and proposed land uses, the existing zoning and proposed zoning, and the adjacent land uses. The PUD zoning district was selected because it is the only zoning district the City has that, would respect -% and ho~r the current- t-ounty--approva 1.- --- ------. ~ WISHED TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF OR AGAINST THIS PROPOSED lAND USE ELEMENT ~~/REZONING. THE~~~RE~_MAYOR HARMENING DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING Motion Commissioner Katz moved to transmit the proposed annexation of lawrence Oaks to the Department of Community Affairs. Vice Mayor Matson seconded the motion. Mayor Harmening read into the record a memo from the Fire Chief to the City Manager regarding the annexation of properties west of lawrence Road, in which it is indicated that Boynton Beach Fire Station 3 provides superior equipment, more personnel, and quicker response times. The motion carried 4-0. . - 14 - ~ES '-~'---------- , PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING .- TON BEACU, FLORIDA -_/ JANUARY 10. 1995 Ms. Burns expressed the oplnlon that the residents would not gain anything for the extra tax dollars. Vice Chairman Oube advised that they would be receiving City services which include Police, Fire and emergency rescue services in addi- tion to refuse collection. Mr. Rumpf advised that the Police, Fire and Rescue have evaluated the property and indicated that it exists within their service area. They can immediately take over responsibility at a higher quality than the County provides. Although sanitation rates will increase, water and sewer rates will decrease since the City is allowed to charge a premium for water and sewer to out-of-City residents. Mr. Rumpf advised Ms. Burns that the refuse collection rates could increase up to $50 more per year if the condos are con- sidered single-family residences with curbside pickup. Mr. Weigle inquired as to whether or not the City has noted a rise in property value because a property was annexed into the City. Mr. Rumpf was unable to respond since this program has not been in place long enough to be a good indi- cator. According to the County, properties are not appraised based upon juris- diction. Motion Mr. Golden moved to approve the request to show annexed land as High Density Residential and to rezone from RM-SE (Multi-family Residential, Medium Density - Special Exception) in Palm Beach County to R-3 (Multi-family Residential), sub- ject to the recommendations and findings in the staff report and that it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Vice Chairman Oube seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. Annexation Progr~ Application '4 Lawrence Oaks Lawrence Oaks - Oriole Homes, "Inc. 42 acres at the northwest corner of Lawrence Road and Knollwood Road Request to show annexed land as Low Density Residential and to rezone from RS-SE (Single-Family Residential - Special Exception) in Palm Beach County to PUO (Planned Unit Development). Mr. Rumpf made the presentation. He advised that this is a County-approved project which received site plan approval in 1993. This is the remaining phase of Fox Hollow. With respect to reviewing and permitting, this would be a simi- lar situation as exists with the Windward PUO. If annexed, at that point in time, the City would be responsible for completing the necessary reviews, issuing permits and making the inspections for a project not reviewed in the City. The City is working on finding a solution to this problem. 5. Project Name: Owner: Location: Description: The proposed Low Density Residential land use is comparable to the County.s Medium Residential 5. The Planned Unit Development zoning district is proposed as it is the most comparable district to the County's PUO district, and is the only City district that will accommodate the County approval of the lawrence Oaks site plan. Staff recommends that the property be zoned to PUO with the County-approved site plan. Staff conducted a technical review and forwarded corrments. - 15 - .LNUTES PlANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 10, 1995 Staff recommends approval of the application based on: 1. The subject property is contiguous to the corporate limits; 2. The subject property lies within the City's Reserve Annexation Area; 3. The annexation of this property is consistent with the City's Annexation Program; and 4. The proposed land use amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. CHAIRMAN lEHNERTZ ANNOUNCED THE PUBLIC HEARING. Janice Burke~ reDresenting Lowell Homes~ reported that she has a master model of all of the elevations of the models that will be built on the property. Because of this, the submittal process of any model she sells is not very intense and she is able to secure a permit within three to five working days. Ms. Heyden advised that in anticipation of this annexation, the City has approached the County to see if they will continue the penmitting even though the property is annexed. So far, there has been no response from the County. If that proposal is not suitable to the County, the City will take on those functions. We should have a response shortly. If the County does not support the proposal, staff will meet with Lowell Homes as soon as we hear from DCA to make a decision on how the penmitting will be accomplished. f Ms. Burke expressed concerns about time delays, and questioned whether the City has a Master Model Program. She explained the Program for Ms. Heyden, who advised that the process sounds similar to what we have in place in the City. Ms. Heyden suggested that Ms. Burke meet with the Building Department if she wants an answer prior to this returning from DCA. Dr. B. J. Hunt~ resident of Fox Hollow~ said his board asked that he attend this meeting and bring back information. He explained that Lawrence Oaks and Fox Hollow were one property. Fox Hollow was developed and lawrence Oaks was taken over by the present developer. Both developments are attempting to effect a separation which the County does not presently recognize. Ms. Heyden advised that the City is not planning to annex the northern part of Fox Hollow at this time. A resident of 7613 Green Lake ~ said his area was not considered for annexa- tion. There will be a common road with Police protection only up to a boundary. Chainman Lehnertz again reiterated his earlier remarks regarding investigating other properties throughout the City for annexation. This property has a very irregular barrier in terms of service providers. It will be easy to mix up the locations of the barriers. - 16 - NUTES ~tMNING AND DEVELOP~, .T BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 10, 1995 / In looking at this in terms of land use and zoning, the Board is being asked to zone something and provide a land use designation for uses with 101 front and rear setbacks. No setbacks are provided for screen or pool enclosures. While this might be okay for the County, it is not good for the City. Even staff com- ments state this is not consistent with what we have in the City. Chainman Lehnertz stated that he has major problems with this request. Further, as pointed out by Mr. Rumpf, annexation is not supposed to create pockets. This application comes very close to creating an unincorporated pocket in the City. Motion Vice Chainman Oube moved to approve the request of Annexation Program Application #4 - Lawrence Oaks, to show annexed land as Low Density Residential and to rezone from RS-SE (Single-Family Residential - Special Exception) in Palm Beach County to PUO (Planned Unit Development), subject to staff comments and that it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Golden seconded the motion, which carried 6-1. (Chairman Lehnertz cast the dissenting vote.) OTHER None COMMENTS BY MEMBERS Chairman Lehnertz stated that although the Board normally has legal representa- tion, there was no representation this evening. There were a number of times during this meeting when legal counsel was needed. Chairman Lehnertz asked that staff or the City Commission work on making sure legal representation is avail- able to the Board. Mr. Rosenstock said this happened in the past when he was Chainman of the Board. He feels the City Commission is not reading the minutes of these meetings. He suggested that Chairman lehnertz contact the City Managerls Office and dictate a letter stating that the City Attorney was not present and find out whether there has been a change in policy relative to the Attorney advising this Board. If no such change has taken place, an explanation regarding his absence should be pro- vided to the Board. Vice Chairman Dube expressed his concern because of the fact mission and the City Attorney were aware that there would be tion appearing before the Board on one of the applications. were placed at a disadvantage not having an attorney present that the City Com- legal representa- The Board members to advise them. Mr. Golden also expressed his opinion that the Board should have had legal representation because of the issues that had to be addressed this evening. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting properly adjourned at 9:35 p.m. ~~.~ GYc(net M. Prainito Recording Secretary (Three Tapes) - 17 - -.--- M ffi _If_-h~!; ~ilil ~ ill[ PL;\NNING AND .. ZONING DE.PT. . Q1yJl ~~< ~k> , ~T~ WHEREAS, the city commission of the city of Boynton Bea~~. RESOLUTION NO. ,.f96 ~/J~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZtNG EXECUTION OF AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH PALM BEACH COUNTY FOR THE COUNTY'S CONTINUED ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS AND CONDUCTING OF REQUIRED BUILDING INSPECTIONS PURSUANT TO THOSE PERMITS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF "LAWREtfqE OAKS" SUBDIVISION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DA~. deems it beneficial to enter into an agreement with Palm Beach County for the County's continued issuance of building permits and conducting of required building inspections pursuant to those permits for the development of the area known as "Lawrence Oaks" subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT: Section 1. The Mayor and ci ty Clerk are authorized to execute the agreement between the City and Palm Beach County, a copy of which is attached hereto ~bit "A"'~ Section 2. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THIS ~ DAY OF ..::::56~B"~ 1996. CITY BY: A~ Mayor OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA ~ ,\\\""ur""",~ ~"'~ 9EACIf 1~~ ~ ,,0 "':;eD'~ ~ s <' .,~\ ~ ~.).. ':0 ~ = 0 !Cl: 0 I 4C :: = CD icr n""": I Q = .-.0 ^,v . ... :: ~ \)p \9... -J l 4:' ;: ~O~ """-"ol$ ~ ~~~,,~ ~ .(/~ ~ ""'~.., ~,~ ~"'IIIIIIII"'''\~ ATTEST: (.J- ://;i Commissioner ' \~ (~v~~,_. ,. \(~ Commissioner ~~ (~ -- /~dssioner /) . ~~~ City erk ., ~ t. . ~..' / RESOLUTION NO. R-83-60-A RESOLUTION APPROVING ZONING PETITION 82-71, SPECIAL EXCEPTII WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, as the governing body, pursuant to the authority vested in Chapter 163 and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, is authorized and empowered to consider petitions relating to ~oning; and WHEREAS, the notice and hearing requirements as provided for in Chapter 402.5 of the Palm Beach County Zoning Code Ordinance No. 73-2 have been satisfied; and WHEREAS, Petition No. 82-71 was presented to the Board of County Commissioners of Palm Beach County at its public hearing conducted on 29 July 1982 ; and WHER~^S, the noa~d of County Commissioners has considered the evidence and testimony presented by the applL(>Hlt and other interestedpartJes and the l't3commenrlations of the IJdr'i.OUS county reVle-V-l and the l'ecommencld t Jons of the Planning COlrlmission; and WHEP,Ci\S, 'the Board of County Commissioner's made the following ",,:fi,~,~i,~gs of fac't: 1. 'J'tw }H"oposal y,lould be in harmc)J)',,! and compatible H i.th the p:cesen t and future d~v~' lopment of the dl'f.;.:i concerned. NOyl, THF:pr;rOgE, DE IT J:f:SOLVED BY TIn: B(MRD Of COUNTY COM}lISSIONERS OJ' PAUl BEACH CO!.'i'i'['"{, FLOIUDA, assembled in regular session this 29th c:I2<'y' of ,July 1.902 , that Petition No. 82-71 the petition of r,;J [Fn'/OOD, n. V. and JONATHAN F. CAMPAIGNE by Henry Skokowski, Agent, for the FURTHER SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO ALLOW A PLANNED UNIT Di~ELGrMENT on the North 1/2 of Tract 1, and all of Tracts 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 16 of the Subdivision of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 12, Township 45 South, Range 42 East, as recorded in Plat Book 9, page 74, less rights-of-way for Lake Worth Drainage District Lateral Canals L-19 and 20 and less the right-of- way of Lawrence Road. SUBJECT TO an encroachment on that portion of - aforesaid Tract 13 described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the West line of Tract 13 v.rith the North line of Tract 15 of the Amended Plat of Section 12, Township 45 South, Range 42 East, recorded in Plat Book 9, page 74; thence run South along the West line of Tract 13 a distance of 132 feet to a point; thence run Easterly on a line . . . .; 't: ' -,_. parallel to the Easterly extension of the North line of Tract 15 a distance of 14 feet to a point; thence run Northerly a distance of 132 feet, more or less, to a point in the Easterly extension of the North line of Tract 15, which point is 23 feet, more or less, from the intersection of the West line, of Tract 13 with the North line of Tract 15; thence Westerly along the Easterly extension of the North line of Tract 15 a distance of 23 feet, more or less, to the Point of Beginning, as described in Official Record Book 3272, page 1935. Said property located on the west side of Lawrence Road, being bounded on the south by L.W.D.D. Lateral Canal No. 20 and being bounded on '. the north by L.W.D.D. Lateral Canal No. 19, was approved as amended subject to the following special conditions: 1. Significant on-site vegetation shall be preserved. 2 . Petitioner' shall construct at the time the north entrance a. Left turn lane, south approach. 3. Petitioner. ahall construct at the time the south entrance road to L:::tHrence Road is constructed: 1. Left turn lane, south approach. Peti tionel' nhall contribute Seventy ThowWlld Seven Hundred and Twenty .five Dollars ($70,725.00) tOWdt'c] the cost of meeting thlfl. project IS dir\ect and identif.i.clhle traffic ,;impact -to be paid on a pro-rata basis a't tIle time of the .filing of each plat. .. ' ;~., , ' 5. The devel,.>pi?-r shall take t'easonable preca;ltions during the developmeTlt of this project to insure that fugitive part- iculates (Just particles) from this proj~ct do not become a nuisance to neighboring properties. 6. The develop2[' shall t2~e necessary pr~cautions to insure there ",Jill IJe no pol].lttant run-offh'orn this project to adj acent or ned.rby Silr face watt~rs. 7. Developer shall dedicate to Lake Worth Drainage District, through Qui.t Clcd,m IH.3ed or an Easement,- the North 45.00 feet of Tracts 1-1\ inclusive, for the right-of-way for Lateral Canal No. 19 and the South 35.00 feet of Tracts 10-13 inclusive and Tract 16 for the right-of-way for Lateral Canal No. 20 all according to the subdivision of the Southeas t 1/1[ 0 f Section 12, Township 45 Sou-th, Range 42 East, as recorded in Plat Book 9, page 74. 8. The gross density of Parcel A shall not exceed 1.0 dwelling units per acre. 9. The gross density of Parcel B shall not exceed 3.3 dwelling units per acre. 10. No structures in Parcels A Plan, Exhibit #3. --..........-1 Cl..I.l.u. B as designated.on the Master 11. No structure shall be constructed within 50 feet of the project's entire eastern property line, including parcels A and B as designated on the Master Plan, Exhibit #3~ with existing vegetation to remain within the first 25 feet. 12. No residential structures shall be constructed in the project's northeast corner within 660 feet of Lawrence Road. ... ... ~. fI r 13. A continuous 6 foot opaque screen consisting of native land- scaping and a 6 foot security fence and wall shall be con- structed in accordance with the notations on the project's Master Plan, Exhibit #3, along the entire contiguity with abutting private properties along the eastern property boundary 14. Based upon additional aerial study of the subject areas, it is further recommended that staff work with the petitioner and developer at such time that site development commences to insure identification and preservation of significant native vegetation. 15. North pool area shall be resticted to daylight hours and ad~lts only (to be incorporated into Homeowners Restrictions). 16. Petitioner shall retain onsite the first one inch of the stormwater run-off per Palm Beach County Subdivision and Platting Ordinance 73-4, as amended. Commissioner Koehler , moved for approval of the petition. . The motion was seconded by Commissioner Bailey , and upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Norman Gregory, Chairman Peggy Bvatt, Vi~e Chairman Bill n~dley, neflllier DennIs Koehler, Nember Fran): router, npfflber Aye Nay Aye Aye Aye : The foregoing l'u:lolut:ion was c1w<1.ared c1uly pasEjcd and adopted this '18th day of January 1983 , confh)fll i IIg action of 29 July 1982. APPROVE AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY f'ALI'! BEACH COtHf'j"{, FLORLD.A,).~",:,:"l~,~~;: .>.::;;:'. . , ~': ..,.,., I 1('.' - -... '. ,,,,, ..., BY ITS BOARD 0 I' COUNTX. ~;~"~'(~"","""""..:.." ',' . ".' "l, \ \1. ., Cot1NISSIONERS .::.~::,.;" /",: \ S'. S'; , (p ~ ........ , >':. ,." \. \to- '-.... 1"'. .JOHN B. DUNKU;, Clerk .~~~,;..' (','< ",-",-:p' ;' "'{.) -- '. r...... , .! (.... f..\ . " . ,,? By:X~LL\,~/~~3~/~ J~,~cJ;" ~ ~ . D.~ puty Clerk :- ;/[, . \. n .~ :. ,r',.............,; ',.;,>)0 ~~. 4,.. ,>" ~ . -::"'" ~ ,,".y !'< . ", v J;~ ('/ i"~ ~,,"'." . '';, 41 ..., \t. "..."-. ""'-';"'.' :"Y,lr:. '10.. 'I. .1"."'\\'\ 'J; ~ /?~- / County Attorney ..J .~ ." ,.',.... RESOLUTION NO. R-83-60 0)? RESOLUTION APPROVING ZONING PETITION 82-71, REZONING WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, as the governlng body, pursuant to the authority vested in Chapter 163 and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, is authorized and empowered to consider petitions relating to zoning; and 'WHEREAS, the notice and hearing requirements as provided for ln Chapter 402.5 of the Palm Beach County Zoning Code Ordinance No. 73-2 have been satisfied; and WHEREAS, Petition No. 82-71 was presented to the Board of County Commissioners of Palm Beach County at its public hearing conducted on 29 July 1982 ; Rnd WHERr;l\~), -the BOClt.'d of County Commissioners has considered the evidence and l'f~3 timony presented by the appl LCclnt and other interested part It-' ,'" and tll(~ r8cormnendCltions of tltf~ vilr'ious county reVle\.J agencies and the r't-~comrw~nrja t ions of the Planning C:C"illOission; and WHEvr:.!',r:, t.he Boa.r'u of (:rJlJnty CommissiulP,r's made the follovling findings of.fact: 1. i'hl, I'roposal HOll L,I bf;~ in hannony dnd compatible ,I] ! h the present ,mrl future c1evf: Lopment of the Il',,~a concer'n.,~d. NOH, 'ril;:i~I~F'ORE, 13r IT FCSOLVED BY Tl-n: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS or FAl)'1 nEACH CC)f'itf L'Y, FLJOIUDA, aS~3emb1ed in regular session this 29th day of July 1982 , that Petition No. 82-71 the pe.tition of f'rnFTHOOD, H. V. and JONATHAN F. CAMPAIGNE by Henry SkokU\-];"3l,j , Agent, for the REZONING, FROH AR-AGRICULTUPi RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, TN F'i\:~-f, M~D RE-RESIDENTIAL ESTATE DISTRICT, IN PART, TO RS-RESIDENTIAIJ S INGLE FAMILY DISTRICT on the North 1/2 of Tract 1, and all of Tra~ts 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 12, 13 and l~ of the Subdivision of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 12, Township 45 South, Range 42 East, as recorded in Plat Book 9, page 74, less rights-of- way for Lake Worth Drainage District Lateral Canals L-19 and 20 and less the right-of-way of Lawrence Road. SUBJECT TO an encroachment on that portion of aforesdid Tract 13 described 2S folloHs: BEGINNING at the intersection of the West line of Tract 13 with the North line of Tract 15 of the Amended Plat of Section 12, Township 45 South, . ,J Range 42 East, recorded in Plat Book 9, page 74; thence run South along the West line of Tract 13 a distance of 132 feet to a point; thence run Easterly on a line parallel to the Easterly extension of the North line of Tract 15 a distance of 14 feet to a point; thence run Northerly a distance of 132 feet, more or less, to a point in the Easterly extension of the North line of Tract 15, which point is 23 feet, more or less, from the intersection of the West line, of Tract 13 ~ith the North line of Tract 15; thence Westerly along the Easterly extension of the North line of Tract 15 a distance of 23 feet, more or less, to the Point of Beginning, as described in Official Record Book 3272, page 1935. Said property located on the' west side of Lawrence Road, being bounded on the south by L.W.D.D. Lateral Canal No. 20 and being bounded on the north by L.W.D.D. Lateral Canal No. 19, was approved. Commissioner J(oehler , moved for' cl.ppr'uval of the petition. The motion was seconded by Commiss:ic.ner Bailey , and upon being put to a vote, tl18 '.10 te ~hlS ,'1[; follclws: Norm,<,I1 I~r'f:;gory, Chairm:1JI Peggy I.Vi"J t:t:, Vice Chail'fwm Bill 'h:ii.Jey, Memher Denn i::; Knf.~hlm', l-tembec FraIlL f'r/~1tel', Hember Aye Nay l\.yc Aye Aye The' foregoing l'i~Lolution \-1('1:'; (h"'~lat'ed duly pa~;'jcd and adopted this ,18th day cr LTanuary 19W3 , confLcrning action of 29 July 1982. APPROVE AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY PALN BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", " ,",> BY ITS BOARD OF cou?\r~.,J,:,,<,.:~,:,,' ,::~' r J,..:'j::, ,}'~".fI;"\.~..~;!....:'.", ,,\\\....( {..~......,. '.' COMMISSIOllTERS .;,\~,,~,;':;>o~i' "", It..". ",,,(: a l !'~ )"J"..!. ....'f: '. . '.~, ...." ~ C" l '. ';"<:"',"",\ ",~ .,' \ \ ~, " , (J: 1-' .... 'I :",.":~:.'i' '"..... ...~. . rt ~,' JOlItJ B. DUNKLE, Cl2rk:> ...\" ,. t .':--',...r- r"" ..'\;~ .;, " .......~'. .. ;J. . , , :_,; ,:" '".' "'t.}- ..I" By: ~OCXLtLt~c3',icC0i-'tj;' ,~ ~ \ Deputy Clerk, :}..', -;; (; ~ :._y,: ~.( :., ~", ".J (, " ." ; " , ~ ;- ", ~{:/-: .':':."'.,.:J (/" , ~ ~ :' ',";f;'" ". o{)o ~ ~ '" : \}~f,f.~\",:,""'",,~ -,..,: \' \ ,\"" $C '~~y CORRESPONDENCE & LETTERS .._,..._' ~.. ._.___._. ,"'_,',,__'" _..._....._.__.~___..._.,__ .____ "n_. .. ,12/08 '97 10:89 ID:PZ8-ZDNING FAX:5612885167 PAGE 1 loanl (If Cnunty COl11ntisNillnl'rs .~ I? r~l ~ ~ W ~ rn Ls 12J ! lJ I IU1i rrR 3 1997 1 L! r-l'". - ! j I PLANNING AND I ZONING OEPt Cuunty Adminisll'illor Rol.>l'rl W,'i~m<ln '('Il I., l;oro;lo.'r, Cll;liTll1;m hut ^~\rol\son, V iCI' ('11.'11'111.\1\ ~(lr...n T, Mil/":Ui' ::0\1'01 A. R()I"'rl~ "",,IHPn II. N"""..II Allr)' Md "lrty A.llld" Ford r .1'0' cp.lrlltll!nl of II J.'U\ni ng, Zoning & nuilding Llln in~ OJ vision ZONING RECEPTIONIST: (407)233-5200 ZONING FAX NUMBER: (407) 233-5165 m THE ATTENTION FACSIMILE COVER SHBET OF: ;;im8R) Ii ~A.J FROH: ou., ....__L. Martin Ilodgk;lnsz. Zoning DirQc'toL" DAPE: P-.-~ 1f.L NUMBER OF PACES (INCLUDING COVER SHEE'.l': 0- . Pleas9 call ~e at 233-5206 Dr .Y ~ecrotdrY, Datty Harlow, at 233- 5234 if you have any quest;jon3 or problemB. Thank you. COHHBN'l'S: '/\n !-:quJI Opl'uriunily - Af(irll1,llivl' ^(II\l11 LrnplllYI'I' ~ j,;:1 prl/;!..,1 (),u",:y";",i """'" 10f) A\IJ;lr,.li,Ill i\V(,llllC Wc~t P,llm B('olCh, FIIJriJ.. :'\:141)/, (407) 233.50(l() h\X: (4ll7) 2:"H-'i165 ~,~ tI;2'/03 '97 10:40 Depilnment or PI.nolo.. Zonmll IL B"Udlnll JOO Australian Avenue Wnsl P~lm F\M~,11 Fl. 33406 (E61) 2.1:1.5000 1I(r IIWWWmrIl1m'!:leIKI1 nus . P..... Bl!!ild. eQilJnl,. 80ard of County Comml..loncr. P.Hn AMOnSOl1, CI1.urman Maude Furd Lee. Vice Chait l\al~n r Mar(US Carol A Roherts Wan.." H. New..!l M.uy Mc:C.my Ken L. FUb1d C::OUqty I\dmlnll1:TIItDr Rohert Wr.1~man, P.F. ".4 ~ F.qualOppc>rtllnirj"' A/.firf'M'llil.''' A.{"tir~n ri'mll/,~,..".,.~ @ pi/,,- "" --ydad"."., ID:PZB-ZONING FAX: 561:2885167 PAGE :2 ~~:\. "'Ur.@ ~ ~ w rn W FFR _ 3 007 rn PlANNING AND tONING DEP! February 3, 1997 Ms. Tambri Heyden, Planning and Z(.)ning Director City of Boynton Beach P,O. 80x 3lO Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 re; Lawrence Oaks Planned Unit Devolopmenl Deilf Tambri: I have spoken with Mr. Michael D. Smith of Lowell Homes rega.rding the proposed alterations to the ca.bana within the Lawrence Oa,kg Planned LJnit Development (PUD), Gen~ral1y. such alterations ate handled on an adminisLratjv~ level by our Development Review Committee stan: provided the alterations are consistent with the overall project approval and there is no encroachment into required setbacks, If you or your staf1'have specific questions regarding the f;,ite plan approval1br the property, please do not hesitate to contact Ms, }'usun Mutgan (561/233- 5042) or me, L Martin Hodgkins, Ale Zoning Director cc: Michael D. Smith, Lowell Homes Barhara Springthorpe, Greenberg, Traurig, et al f:\u~r:r\mh,Jdgkin\lllwTOnIc~. I Department of Planning, Zoning & Building 100 Australian Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33406 (561) 233-5000 http://www.co.palm-beach.fl.us . Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners Burt Aaronson. Chairman Maude Ford Lee, Vice Chair Karen T. Marcus Carol A. Roberts Warren H. Newell Mary McCarty Ken L Foster County Administrator Robert Weisman. P.E. "An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer" @ printed on recycled paper f~ ~-- ~ ~LOANNNING AND " ING DEPt February 3, 1997 Ms, Tambri Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director City of Boynton Beach P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 re: Lawrence Oaks Planned Unit Development Dear Tambri: I have spoken with Mr. Michael D. Smith of Lowell Homes regarding the proposed alterations to the cabana within the Lawrence Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) Generally, such alterations are handled on an administrative level by our Development Review Committee staff, provided the alterations are consistent with the overall project approval and there is no encroachment into required setbacks. If you or your staff have specific questions regarding the site plan approval for the property, please do not hesitate to contact Ms, Fusun Mutgan (561/233- 5042) or me. L. Martin Hodgkins, AI Zoning Director tl. cc: Michael D. Smith, Lowell Homes Barbara Springthorpe, Greenberg, Traurig, et al f:\user\mhodgkin\1awroaks.l fJJie City of rJ3oynton '.Beat}i 100 ~ 'BoyrUtm 'Beadi ~ P.O. ~Jl0 'BoynUm '&4di, :FWritfa JJ42$-OJ 10 PHONE: (561) 375-6280 FAX:. (561) 375-6357 001 rr;,\. ~@~nwrn I I' - ~ ' v J 1 \U~ NOV 13 9J) \ l ! PLANNING AND 1 ZONING DEPT. OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER (i k ((l, ,.-- ,~) cl ~7',A'&/ ~.,.! / / / ~~ 0/~ November 12, 1996 Jere Smingler, President Manor Forest Homeowners Association, Inc. 4110 Manor Forest Boulevard Lantana, Florida 33462 Re: Lawrence Oaks PUD Dear Mr. Smingler: Thank you for your follow up letter of November 7. The thrust of your letter seems to be that you are not comfortable with my responses to your earlier letter. That being the case, it would serve no useful purpose for me to personally respond to additional questions. By copy of this letter I am asking City Attorney Cherof to provide responses which hopefully you can aCGept. Very truly yours, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA /t~~ #tiM/ William Hukill, P.E. City Engineer WVH/ck xc: Carrie Parker Hill, City Manager James Cherof, City Attorney Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director Anthony Oechiuzzo, Building Permit Administrator C:MANORI Jtnuril4 's rja.uway to tnt rjutfstream - 'Tfte City of r.Boynton r:Beacli "~~' 100 'E. 'Boynton 'Buu:fJ 'Boukvarrf P.O. 'Bo~310 'Boynton 'Buu:fJ, 1"lorUfa 33425-0310 City 1fa[[: (407) 375-6000 j'5U: (407) J75..(;()9() October 22, 1996 Mr. Jere Smingler, President Manor Forest Homeowners Ass. 4110 Manor Forest Boulevard Lantana, FL 33462 Dear Mr. Smingler: Please be informed that we are in receipt of your letter and as the subject matter of your request pertains to the permitting process of the City, we have forwarded it to Mr. Hukil who administers the permitting process through his Building Division of the Development Department. Also, to ensure proper expediting of any future requests which also involve the permitting process, I would recommend that subsequent correspondence be provided directly to Mr. Hukill. Thank you. Sincerely, //" . -;J~ ,;' ( I " -,- L .~<:Llt .9, .f.:VtJ<e,v Tambri J. Heyden, AICP TJH:mr cc: Carrie Parker, City Manager Bill Hukill, Director of Development Dorothy Moore, Plans Reviewer Jim Cherof, City Attorney MR:FH-SMING 51merUas ljateway to tfu ljulfstream rn . FoxJ!Vllow MANOR FOREST HOM E OWN ERS ASSOCIA TI 4110 Manor FOrlst Boulevard Lantana. Florida 33462 O~1obc:r 17, 1996 This letter is to put Bo)'nton Beach on notice to the following fads, . 1) J.'ots #129. #130, #131, #131, #112, #123 and #124 aloog Manor Fore!it Boulevard In the }.ll"rence Oaks P. D.D. ....oot on Plat #2 orManor Forest as recorded In Palm Beach Count.y. 1) This land ls platwd ror a 20' roadway with no sldewalk on the west side and no "alky curbing, which Is conslstel1t with the a~sthctjcs of tile cl:lstlng community. J) This l_Uld Is private pl'opcrt3' and owned .by the :Manor Forest Homeowners Assochltion, Inc()rporat~d. ' 4) The Dwnns oUh" pro))'lrt)' hllve ne\ler authorwd conlitrud'oQ or IlppUed'ror permits fur this road construction. 5) Any changes In the plat would require the notification and approl'aJs of the ownurs. I .__ , ' Oil ~.nHr~. J '::;:1/ @ PLANNING AND ZONING OEPT. ~ I OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Jim Cherat City Attorney FROM: Carrie Parker City Manager DATE: July 10,1995 SUBJECT: Lawrence Oaks Interlocal Agreement The County has now taken the position that the City should draft the Interlocal Agreement regarding Lawrence Oaks (see attached letter trom Barbara Alterman). Please review the attachments and set up a meeting with Tambri and Bill Hukill to develop a draft Interlocal Agreement. Thank you. {'~~~vU?- h~ Carrie Parker ;", ~:: >"~"'~'~~"-----,,,-,--,,,~ ii,,). :,'; (,-.: .,.".' I'-! [1..f.1 r-.'m IU)~n, UU JUl I ,,, 'll I CP :smb c: Tambri Heyden (with attachments) Bill Hukill (with attachments) PZLANNlNG AN() ON/NG DEP[ '" S:ICMICARRIE\SLAWRENC.wPD Board of County Commissioners Ken L. Foster, Chairman Burt Aaronson, Vice Chairman Karen T. Marcus Carol A. Roberts Warren H. Newell Mary McCarty Maude Ford Lee County Attorney Joe Mount RECEIVED June 27, 1995 JUL fi \995 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, FL 33432 ATTN: Ms. Carrie Parker, City Manager RE: BOYNTON BEACH INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT/LAWRENCE OAKS Dear Carrie: subsequent to our recent telephone conversation regarding the timing of an Interlocal Agreement needed by the City of Boynton Beach, I spoke with Kurt Eisman, Kris Garrison and other County staff. It was suggested that the City of Boynton Beach take the initiative of drafting and presenting an agreement to the County staff for review and comment. When Palm Beach County staff is approached by a municipality requesting an agreement, it is generally the municipality which presents initial drafts for review. After agreement is reached, the City can execute the document which is then presented to the Board of County Commissioners for their approval. . I enclosed for your review a memo from Kurt.Eisman outlining some of the issues that were discussed at the meeting with you and your staff and which must be addressed in the draft agreement. In addition, pursuant to our meeting, the following provisions must be included: 1. provisions regarding who will handle plats and required improvements. 2. Conditions of development approvals must be incorporated into any development approvals granted by the City unless the City'S conditions are more stringent. "An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer" nCT:f -::::: .'Ylnred on recycled paper P.O. Box 1989 West Palm Beach, Florida 33402-1989 (407) 355-2225 Suncom (407) 273-2225 FAX: (407) 355-4398 Page 2 June 27, 1995 Interlocal Agreement with the City of Boynton Beach / 3. The agreement should not be piecemeal but should address the issues on a global perspective. a. If no permits are issued by the County, just site plan or zoning approval is given, then the City should take over full responsibility. The trigger for permitting responsibility should be where the project enters the process. I also enclose for your review a sample agreement that Palm Beach County has developed. Please feel free to utilize it. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Kurt Eisman or Kris Garrison. Si)lPerely, ~~ Barbara Alterman, Assistant County Attorney BAles Ene. cc: Kristin Garrison, Executive Director, PZ&B Kurt Eismann, Director Building Department g:\common\wpdata\landuse\cstewart\ila.bb 06/26/95 16:21 PALM BCH CO PLNG ZUN 1/'l:i J:lL.1.ll:i 1JI::I-' 10101 . INTER-OFFICE COMMUNICATION PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT FROM; Kurt Elsmann, Director Building Division TO: Darbal.a Alterman, Assistant County Attorney DATE: June 26,1995 RE: BOYNTON BEACH LIMITED INTE Boynton's request for the Palm Beach County Building Division to provide plan review and inspection service for specific subdivision(s) within its political jurisdiction raises some interesting questions and concerns. Along with the standard language contained in our typical interlocal agreement. the folJowing must be resolved: . A time certain limitation to the agreement. not dependent on the percent of build out in the subdivision. I am concerned that the agreement could turn into the never ending story. Perhaps a general understanding on this point could be reached as to its approximate limitation, and then we could terminate the agreement. . The city would need LO adopt our codes for the subdivision. . Once the termination of the agreement takes place, the Cit.y will be responsible tor thc completion of inspections and issuance of the Certificate ot" Occupancy. . Permits for ancillaJ:Y SUUCture5 following the completion of the primary structure will be issued by the County in order to eliminate inspection confusion. The City may not agree with what our ULDC allows in these instanCes. Please let me know if you need further clarification on these issues. 'll1anks for your persistence. kfe/ma8l1ldiDlIo. ..fa c: Dominic Sims JUN-26-1995 16:41 407 233 5020 94% P.01 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT This Interlocal Agreement is made the day of , 199_, between the city of a municipality located in Palm Beach, Florida (hereinafter "CITY") and Palm Beach County, a political subdivision of the state of Florida, '(hereinafter "COUNTY"), each one constituting a public agency as defined in Part I of Chapter 163, Florida statutes. WIT N E SSE T H WHEREAS, section 163.01, Florida Statutes, known as the "Florida Interlocal Cooperation Act of 1969" authorizes local governments to make the most eff icient use of their powers by enabling them to cooperate with other localities on a basis or mutual advantage and thereby to provide services and facilities that will harmonize geographic,. economic, population and other factors influencing the needs and development of local communities; and WHEREAS, Part I of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, permits public agencies as defined therein to enter into inter local agreements with each other to jointly exercise any power, privilege, or authority which such agencies share in common and which each might exercise separately; and WHEREAS, [insert particulars] NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual representations, terms, and covenants hereinafter set forth, the parties hereby agree as follows: section 1. Purpose The purpose of this Agreement is to [ ] section 2. Definitions The following definitions shall apply to this Agreement: "Act" means Part I of Chapter 163, Florida statutes. "Aqreement" means this Interlocal Agreement, including any amendments or supplements hereto, executed and delivered in accordance with the terms hereof. [insert others as needed] section 3. ReDresentative/Monitorina position The COUNTY'S representative/contract monitor during the term of this Agreement shall be whose telephone number is (407) The CITY'S representative/contract monitor during the term of this Agreement shall be , whose telephone number is (407) section 4. Effective Date/Term This Agreement shall take effect upon execution. The term of this agreement shall be for a period of [ ]. and shall continue in full force and effect up to and through [ ] unless otherwise terminated as provided herein. section s. services Rendered section 6. Responsibilities and Duties CITY agrees to: COUNTY agrees to: section 7. Pavments/lnvoicinq and Reimbursement CITY (COUNTY) shall submit monthly invoices to COUNTY (CITY) which will include a reference to this Agreement, identify the 2 [project], and identify the amount due and payable to CITY (COUNTY) . Invoices shall be itemized in sufficient detail for prepayment audit thereof. CITY (COUNTY) shall supply any further documentation deemed necessary by COUNTY (CITY). Invoices received from CITY (COUNTY) will be reviewed and approved by , indicating that expenditures have been made in conformity with this Agreement and then will be sent to COUNTY'S (CITY'S) Finance Department for final approval and payment. Invoices will normally be paid within thirty (30) days' following approval. Section 8. Fundinq Source [Ad valorem, general funds, specific funds, etc.] section 9. Access and Audits CITY (COUNTY) shall maintain adequate records to justify all charges, expenses, and costs incurred in performing the work for at least three (3) years after completion of the projects. The COUNTY (CITY) shall have access to all books, records and documents as required in this section for the purpose of inspection or audit during normal business hours. section 10. Administration section 11. Renewal This Agreement may be renewed [ ]. section 12. Breach/Opportunitv to Cure The parties hereto expressly covenant and agree that in the event either party is in default of its obligations herein, the party not in default shall provide to the party in default thirty 3 (30) days written notice to cure said default before exercising any of its rights as provided for in this Agreement. section 13. Termination This Agreement may be terminated by either party to this Agreement upon [ ] days written notice to the other party. Section 14. Enforcement Costs Any costs or expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees) associated with the enforcement of the terms and/or conditions of this Agreement shall be bor~e by the respective parties, provided, however, that this clause pertains only to the parties to this Agreement. section 15. Annual ADDroDriation Each party's performance and obligation to pay under this agreement is contingent upon an annual budgetary appropriation by its respective governing body for subsequent fiscal years. Section 16. Notice All notices required to be given under this Agreement shall be deemed sufficient to each party when delivered by United states Mail to the following: COUNTY CITY Name Name Address City state Zip section 17. Delegation of Dutv Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to authorize the Address City state Zip 4 delegation of the constitutional or statutory duties of state, county, or city officers. section 18. Filinq , A copy of this Agreement shall be filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court in and for Palm Beach County. section' 19. Liabilitv The parties to this Agreement and their respective officers and employees shall not be deemed to assume any liability for the acts, omissions, and negiigence of the other party. Further, nothing herein shall be construed as a waiver of sovereign immunity by either party, pursuant to Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. section 20. Indemnification CITY agrees to protect, defend, reimburse, indemnify and hold COUNTY , its agents, employees and elected officers, and each of . them free and harmless at all times from and against any and all suits, actions, legal or administrative proceedings, claims, demands, damages, liabilities, interest, attorney's fees, costs and expenses of whatsoever kind or nature whether arising in any manner directly or indirectly caused, occasioned or contributed to in whole or in part, by reason of ,any act, omission or fault whether active or passive of COUNTY, of anyone acting under its direction or control, or on its behalf in connection with or incident to the performance of this Agreement. CITY'S aforesaid indemnity and hold harmless obligations, or portions or applications thereof, shall apply to the fullest extent permitted by law but in no event shall they apply to liability caused by the negligence or willful 5 misconduct of the COUNTY, its respective agents, servants, employees or officers, nor shall the liability limits set forth in 768.28, Florida Statutes, be waived. Section 21. Insurance The CITY shall, during the term of this agreement, and any extensions hereof maintain in full force and effect, general and [property] insurance, which specifically covers all exposures incident to the intent and responsibilities under this Agreement. Such insurance shall be with a company acceptable to the COUNTY Risk Manager and in an amount of not less than [ ] for [ ] and to support the CITY'S agreement of indemnity. Policy ( ies} shall be endorsed to show Palm Beach County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, as an additional insured as its interests may appear; and shall also provide that insurance shall not be canceled, limited or' non- renewed until after thirty (30) days' written notice has been given to the COUNTY. Current certif icates of insurance evidencing required coverage must be on file with the COUNTY at all times. CITY expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection furnished by CITY shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify and save harmless COUNTY under the provisions of Section 20 of this agreement. section 22. Amendments This.Agreement may be amended [ ] section 23. Remedies This Agreement shall be construed by and governed by the laws 6 Board of County Commissioners Ken 1. Foster, Chairman Burt Aaronson, Vice Chairman Karen T. Marcus Carol A. Roberts Warren H. Newell Mary McCarty Maude Ford Lee County Administrator Robert Weisman Department of Planning. Zoning & Building Zoning Division July 5, 1995 G. r~-~ R ~ [i~ --n\Vr ~- w. , IS l!!J l' 'j l5 \ ~ r ~~'.~-:~ ~ I PLANNinG MlD ,-a.. '1 i ZONING DEPT. i' Ms. Tambri Hayden Director of Planning and Zoning City of Boynton Beach P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 re: Lawrence Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) Dear Tambri: As you requested on June 23, 1995, attached is information regarding the County's approval of the Lawrence Oaks PUD. If an interlocal agreement for the project is to be completed, I would suggest including the site plan, conditions of approval, etc., as they relate to this project. Please do not hesitate to contact at 233-5234 me if you have any questions or require further information. ~ AICP 1 cc: Kris Garrison, Executive Director, PZB Kurt Eismann, Building Official, PZB Barbara Alterman, Assistant County Attorney Imh:\common\lawoaks.1 "An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer" @ p,inled on recycled paper 100 Australian Avenue West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 (407) 233-5000 FAX: (407) 233-5165 Board of Cou"ty Commi55ion'~ Ken l. Fosler, Chairman Burt Aaronson, Vice Chairman Karen T. M~rcus Cuol A. Roberts W~rren H. NeweU Mary McCart)' Maude ford Lee 407 355 3990 P.01/04 tq~HTY ADMl"STRATOI BobW.lna&1l -JJ / c r;f, /l.wJ1VU~ /;,fj; r /', : '" &AJt 4//,' ". I iJ/ ~~~, ~tl:;>'" < ()t;, "'ll'/, ~'''' ' '~'O~.11~ / ~f:l 'V I "-""'''"-,,, I' / , JUN-~;;-199:> 14:44 BOARD O~ CC PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FAX TRANSMITTAL FORM . Following this cover sb..t is/ue S page(s) (not inolud1.Qg tbe cover .heet). If uy part of th11 mes..ge 1s 1Ii..ug or reeeLve4 poorl,., plea.. call the receptionist at 401/355-2001. Thank you. , DATI: TO: , - ~ - J- ~) TIME: HAMI: {I4,e..e ; ~ I",~k~ DEPARTMENT/COMPANY: TEL.EPHONE No.: tJ/ ~1' /'~.4,y-l-6~/L ~'Y/'VP'I',v 1Jf','cj. FAX No.: s?.>- "0/1 4>..<.d' FROM: NAME: ;;! [jl/t -r VA-)I2u4, r DISTRICT O"ICE: ~A~~ TILEPHONE Mo..t 3.)r> JJv~ ... ,11 7'/V-ro tv' d f:"foL FAX No.: MESSAGE: F.(.~, -An Equal Opportunity - Affi~atLv. Action Employer- P.O. lOX 1989, WEST PALM BEACH. fL 33402-1989 ,,~~Ut,t~1~ p' '"'-.. ~tj;)Y' #'~ ~ ~#'v~ J~ '~~ \ ,> ,,' ( !..oj ~ -'. , f . .-, '" ..~. l ::, · tf~ 1) '. V ~~ '7f'liY .0 ~i' ~b ~ ". :., L' . . ~~ / II I y.rvy ~ ').:.....>-- ~ , ~ .1' ~. ~ i ~. I . f'\. l . I ,\ ,,(. , . ~,( { ~ .~I ~~ n' & 8~. /'. . . _,,' ''C'!> ()\'\.".' , ,\ V.. p1~I' {....11.'. U ,Gl-r(lf j~. " " ,~ ).y.~~~; Jf. "k~~dv1',..,._.'''-'' ,. ~ - V -,-,.- y \:'~~..- . ! IJ; 'i c.t ? i;.'~L 'fJ./ RECEIVED JUN 9 1~'i~ CIlY MANAGER'S OFFICE __1 ~J ~JJJ ~~.~~ OW~LI WI"" I.A.. 407 355 3990 P.02/04 "Warren H. Newell County Commissioner District III 301 North Oliv~ 1\ venue 1 ~th Floor We~t PalIn Beach, FL 33401 (407) 35S.2203 ~AX 355.3990 June 9, 1995 Honocilble Jerry Taylor, Hayor City or Boynton Beach 100 Bast Boynton Beach Boulevara Boynton Beacn, Florida 33435 Dear Mayor Taylor: On !I'uesday, June f, the Board o~ Cotmty Commi..ioners approved the updated 5 Year Road Plan tor Pal~ B.ac12 County. '1'his mid-year review i.ncl udec:l the adc:li tioD o~ tbe widening o~ Lawrence Road ~ro1D tNO lanes to five lanes during tbe 97198 fiscal year. The persistence o~ the Ci ty staff and the residents is to be coJ1J1tlended in e~fectively movi.ng this project up. T.bank you for .11 your belp ~jtb tbis issue. I look forward to continue "orking "ith you to address tbe conaernB or the residents in both the Ci ty and the surro~ding u.cincorpora ted areas. If I can be of ~urther assistance please do not be$itate to call on me. Sincflrely, d-- Warren H. Newll District III Commi~sioner attachments c: Ci ty COllUlli..:t on Carrie Parker, City Hanager UN:ub. t.ylor.J. > ",1"1.-1011 ~1II1_r JUN-cl~-l~~~ 14:4~ BOARD OF CC 407 355 3930 P.03/04 LI8TXBa 07 CBAlGI. PRQH 'RlVXOU8LY ADOPTBD (12/20/.4) aOM PROGJW( ADDIIIO.. 10th Avenue North (Construction) Military Trail to Congress Avenue Belvedere Road and Haverhill Road (construction) Bxtend Center Turn Lane. Crestwood Boulevard (Construc'tion) Folso. Road to Okeechobee Road Lawrence Road (Construction) Gateway Boulevard to Hypolwco Road. Melaleuca ~n. (Construction) Haverhil1 Road to Military Trail School Board Related Traffio Signal Installations silver Beach Road (construction) Congress Avenue to Avenue S Smith Dairy Agreement completion of Requirements DBLBTIO.~ !!911 ADVAl'CID Congress Avenue (Construction) Miner Road to Bypoluxo Road Indiantown Road (Construction) 130tb Avenue to Jupiter Parms Road Jog Road (Construction) Clint Moore Road to North of civic Center DBLAYBD Congress Avenue (Construction) Blue Heron Blvd. to Nortblake Blvd. Flavor Pict Road (Construction) West of E-3 Canal to Military Trail FolsOD Road/crestwood (Construction) state Road 80 to Okeechobee Boulevard Forest Hill Boulevard (Construction) at Southern Boulevard (C-51 Canal Bridge) Jog Road (COnstruction) North of civic center to Linton Boulevard Miner Road (Conlltruction) Lawrence Road to Congress Avenu. Northlake Reliever (construction) Garden Road to Convr... Avenue prosperity Farms Road (Construction) Archi.'. Creek Bridge G:\Jf'06l)f9S.1 Adopte4 (12/20/'41 98/99 , 96/97 96/97 A40pte4 (12/20/t4' 94/95 95/96 94/95 94/95 94/95 94/95 94/95 94/95 .ropo..lS 97/98 97/98 96/97 97/98 97/98 95/96 & 96/97 96/97 94/95 .l:'opO..4 97/98 95/96 95/96 PrODO..d. 95/96 96/97 95/96 95/96 95/96 95/96 95/96 95/96 30ard of County Commissioners (en L. Fos{er, Chairman 3urt Aaronson, Vice Chairman (aren T. Marcus :=arol A. Roberts Harren H. Newell \1ary McCarty \1aude Ford Lee County Administrator Robert Weisman Department Planning, Zoning & Building January 13, 1995 Mr. Michael W. Rumpf Senior Planner City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 RE: VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF WINDWARD P. U . D., ROYAL MANOR MOBILE HOME PARK, CARRIAGE GATE CONDOMINIUM AND LAWRENCE OAKS Dear Mr. Rumpf: Thank you for submitting notice of the City's intent to annex the above referenced areas. On behalf of Palm Beach County, the Planning Division has completed its assessment pursuant to our 11 Interim Annexation Policy. 11 For your information, I have enclosed a briefing sheet on the review process. The findings of our review are as follows: 1. Planninq Division: The proposed voluntary annexations are consistent with the statutory requirements of Chapter 171, Florida Statutes (F.S.) Our findings are as follows: a. Windward P.U.D.: Although this area is reasonably compact, it is not contiguous to the City's boundaries. However, if Royal Manor Mobile Home Estates is annexed prior to the Windward P. U. D., then the contiguity concern would be satisfied. b. Royal Manor Mobile Home Estates: Chapter 171, F. S. precludes annexation of finger areas. Although this area is finger-like in appearance, it is not contrary to the compactness requirement of the statute because the property itself is shaped like a finger. c. Carriage Gate Condominium: The area is reasonably compact and contiguous to City boundaries. Boynton Beach Annexation Page 1 Four Areas "An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer" @ printed on recycled paper 100 Australian Avenue West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 (407) 233-5300 ~ / d. ~Lawrence Oaks (a/k/a Manor Forest P.U.D.): The area is reasonably compact and contiguous to City boundaries. However, the City is not annexing the entire P.U.D. but only that portion of the P.U.D. that is not fully / developed. Accessibility to that portion of the P.U.D. (maY be a problem. Another problem pertains to the administration of zoning and building codes while the P. u. D. is being developed. These issues should be resolved prior to annexation. 2. Enaineerina Deoartment: No comments offered. 3. Fire-Rescue Deoartment: Persons residing in Windward, Royal Manor, and Carriage Gate would receive approximately the same response time in the City as they would in the County. Persons residing in Lawrence Oaks could be better serviced by Palm Beach County Stntion 43. 4. Water Utilities Deoartment (WUD): No comments, as the properties are outside the County Utility Service Area. Thank you for the opportunity to review and respond to the proposed voluntary annexations. Please be advised that the comments represent staff review and not the position of the Board of County Commissioners. Cordially, ('. ',_ 't~ ~J ~\UQt,- ~ David J. Kovacs, A.I.C.P. Planning Director p.c. : External Distribution List Honorable Warren H. Newell, District 3 Commissioner Robert P. Banks, County Attorney's Office Iva Barnett Grady, County Administration Bevin Beaudet, P.E., Deputy County Administrator Allan Ennis, Traffic Engineering Division Don Grund, Parks and Recreation Department Lawton McCall, Water Utilities Department Diana Newcomer, Sheriff's Department Kathy Owens, Fire-Rescue Department PZ&B Distribution List Kris K, Garrison, Executive Director, PZ&B Beth McCall, Zoning Division Earl Hahn, Planning Division Boynton Beach Annexation Page 2 Four Areas