LEGAL APPROVAL
ORDINANCE NO. 095-/6
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
REGARDING THE LAWRENCE OAKS-ORIOLE, INC.,
PROPERTY (42 ACRES OF PROPERTY AT THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF LAWRENCE ROAD AND
KNOLLWOOD ROAD) AMENDING ORDINANCE 91-70
OF SAID CITY BY REZONING CERTAIN TRACTS
OF LAND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
HEREIN, FROM RS-SE SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL WITH SPECIAL EXCEPTION FOR
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PALM BEACH
COUNTY) TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
(CITY); AMENDING THE REVISED ZONING MAP
ACCORDINGLY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS,
SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida has adopted Ordinance No. 91-70, in which a
Revised Zoning Map was adopted for said City; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Boynton
i
'! Beach, Florida, in accordance with the Annexation Program, is
simultaneously herewith adopting an Ordinance annexing certain
property; and
il WHEREAS, the City of Boynton Beach, in connection with
[I aforesaid Annexation Program, has heretofore filed a Petition,
;1
'I
pursuant to Section 9 of Appendix A-Zoning, of the Code of
Ordinances, City of Boynton Beach, Florida, for the purpose of
rezoning certain property consisting of 42 acres located
adjacent to the municipal limits of said City, said land being
more particularly described hereinafter, from RS-SE Single
Family Residential with Special Exception for Planned unit
Development (Palm Beach County) to Planned Unit Development
(City), which requests that the 42 acres be removed from the
boundaries of the RS-SE zone to allow for the processing of
the rezoning application;
Ii WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it in the best
Ii
I interests of the inhabitants of said City to amend the
I aforesaid Revised Zoning Map as hereinafter set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT:
Section 1: The following described land, located in the
City of Boynton Beach, Florida, to-wit:
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A"
be and the same is hereby rezoned from RS-SE (County) to
Planned Unit Development (City). A location map is attached
hereto as Exhibit liB" and made a part of this Ordinance by
reference.
Section 2: That the aforesaid Revised Zoning Map of the
City shall be amended accordingly.
A oertain parcel of land being a portion of Trac~& 10, 11, 14, 1)
and 16 of t.he Subdivision of t:hg SouthQast o.uarlgr of section 12,
TOWM9hip 45 So~th. RanqA 42 ~.C~, ac ~.ccr~.d in Plet Book 9, Psg-
74 of the Public:: P.caeordc of Pa]JJ\ B.aoh Ccun'ty, Florida;, sa14
pa~oel ~eing more particularly deegr1bed ~~ fQl1owa:
Commencing at the southeCl.s-t corner of t~he southeas't ,one
ql.'l:n;t(l!~ of Sectton 1.2; t:hl!'!nce south &9-33.37" wt!Glt along
the Sc>uth llIll!: of section 1.2 t a distance of 40.04 fuet.,
to eo point along tbe illest Rlgh't-of-way line of Lawrenc@
~Oddi thence North 0260Z'59" East, along said West Right-
of-Way linQ, a distanee of l!.Ol feet to a point on the
south line of the aforesaid Tract 16 and the Point ot
aeginninq: t'heI1C~ Sont:h 89D33'37" West along the Sout.h
line or said Tracts 16, 10. 11, 12 an~ 1), a distance of
2149.52 feet: 1:0 the Southwest corner of said Trac-e 13;
thence North 04"00'28" East along ~he l~.~t. line of s'lid
Traot 13. a distance of 1]34.39 ~QO~ to ~h. No~we5t
corner of sa id T:rac1: 1.3; i:hgncQ Norlb 6904 a J l.~" East
along the North 11n,. of said Tract 13, t.l distance of
351.25 fOQt to a point on tee boundary ot Plat NO. 2f
Manor For~ct, as r*-oQrdeQ'in Plftt aOOK 41, pages 88 and
g9 r Pu.blic Records of Pam Beach county I Ylorida; i:hen~@
along gaid boundary of Plat 110. 2, ManOl;' Forest, fot' the
next fif~een (l~) described lines being South 82024'49"
East, a dista.nce at' 123.71 feet to a point along the Wast
Ri911t.-of-wai- lint;! of Manor Forest Boulevard~ said point
lying on a curve concave to th* Sou.t:hea!lt. h"\ring a
cen~ral angle of 70012'00" and a radius of 410.00 feet.
and -,.;hose chord bears Sotlt:h 05025# 20" Wo~t; 1:hQnoe alon':J
the ~rc of said curve, a d.'.1.stance of 502.34 feet 1:0 'the
pO int of compol.lnd cU%itatur2 of '" cu.rv4l! conc:ave to tIle
Nort:hg;:lst having 1') central aTl91e of Oc;o13"OO" and a
radiu!;; of 1275.00 feet and ~hoso;@ chm:'q bears south
32047' 1011 East; tho-nee SQ~tho.<)ete%"ly olo.t19 tbe arc of
,
I
said c\n.'Ve, ~ di~t:ance or 13R.34 feet: 1:bencQ Nnrt:b
~~.05'20" Ea!=t, 3 di$t?n~!": of 75.00 :e~~t. to ~ point
alotlg the arc of tJ. curve havinq a egntral angle of
108<:11'7'39lt and a ::-adi\:ls of 90.00 feet; 'tb9nCQ Sou'thea:Jt-
~rly ,~long thq a::c of o;aid tUl:VQ, 41 di.lilt:anC1~ of 170.11
feet 'to a ~oLl]t of reverSQ cu:t'vaturg; E;,aid t:urve having
a c~ntJ:al angle cf 8U"15'22" .:lnd u radlos Q~ 210.00 teet;
t:bencp- N(>ttbei,sterJ y, along the ~o of said. curve, a
uistallCQ of 294.15 foot to ~ point of eOl'!'1pounl1 cu.'tVatu.!"ej
said curve baving a c;.'!on~t"l tU1gJ..~ of 120. 4~' non and a
radius of 1.~!L 00 f~Qt:; 't:henc@ sout:heasterly aJ.ong the arc
of said cu~vo, ~ dis~cnc~ o~ 347.14 roe~ ~o a point of
reve~G9 curvature, ~aid c\U~~ having a central angle of
:2J4CtO';'41." and a radi.us elf 90.00 teet; ~henee South~rly
<<nd Nor-ther1l along the arc: of said ~r.;e, a distance of
367.74 feet to a point of reverse cUrv~d::ure; said clttVe
hoving a c~trdl angle of ,\4 0 00' 00" and a t.adiuc of
120.00 t~e~; thence .N~rth~as~erly a]~nQ ~hQ arQ of said
cu.rve a di stance of 92.15 feet 1:0 a poini:: of r."VerG~
curvature; said Cllr'\ie having ~ central. angle of 8p615'37"
and a racHus of 60 .teet; t.hane. B02:l:..heact::erly Blong t:he
arc of said carve, a distance of 62.05 teet to a point ot
reverse curva.turel s~i.d ClU"VQ htAving a eent~a.1 angle or
37047rSO" 811d a redills of 2.:35.00 f'~e't., ,t:hence North~est-
~rly along the ar~ of eaid eu~ve, a distance o~ 148.43
feet t:o a I)otnt of rgver!le cU:t-.rature; said curve having
a cent,ral :ln91~ of 77fOll'40" ana a ralj11.lS or 75.00 feCIt;
tht;!nc~ NOl"thw~c:t~rly e.l<:Jnq the arc 01: sald curve, a
distan~~ o~ 10J.05 feet to a point ot rave~se curvature;
so:aid <'ur~e h~ vin9 a central a.ngle of SO 029'50" and a
radi1.1$ of :1.90.00 'feet; t:h~nc~ Ncrthvte~terly ~long the arc
of said curv~, a dlstanc~ of 252.89 fe~t to a point of
re"Ve1;"se cu..t-vature; said curve having a :::ent.raJ. anglQ of
15"41"\0" and a radius of 210.00 fQgti thenCe Nort.hQag~-
erly along I;.he ar~ of sClid curye, a dlstancQ of 57.52
feet; thenc-e south 87017'3811 East, a di::tanoe of 260.00
feet to a point on thQ tast lin~ of thg a!'()re3nid Tract
10i thence South 02~42'22" We~tt aloug -:h~ Ee.st: line of
s~id!':r.act 10; a dist::.nce ot' 452. 15 ~~ei; to the Northwest
ccrnQr of .the afcra~~id Tr~ct lG; thence North 89840'50"
East 21.ong thQ l10rtll 11tlQ Qr said Tra.:t 16, a dista!lCe of
682. '-4 f~et t.o ~ p(~int 011 the ~legt 'Righl:-ot-lfay line of
Lawrenc/Q RO:'.ld; ~ h-anc'i! SOl.lth 02" 02' 59 ,. We~;t a long the West
Right.-r:,f-Hay line of La~'T'!!nce Roadl a a1st:.allCe of 653.85
f~gt to th~ Point of Beginning.
;1
;I
II
I
I
I
:i
I
ORDINANCE NO. 095-/~
,I
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
REGARDING THE LAWRENCE OAKS-ORIOLE, INC.,
PROPERTY (42 ACRES OF PROPERTY AT THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF LAWRENCE ROAD AND
KNOLLWOOD ROAD)AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-38
OF SAID CITY BY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND
USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF
THE CITY BY ADOPTING THE PROPER LAND USE
OF CERTAIN PROPERTY, MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED HEREINAFTER; SAID LAND
DESIGNATION IS BEING CHANGED FROM MEDIUM
RESIDENTIAL 5 (PALM BEACH COUNTY) TO LOW
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (CITY); PROVIDING FOR
CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Boynton
i
: Beach, Florida has adopted a Comprehensive Future Land Use
'i
! Plan and as part of said Plan a Future Land Use Element by
Ordinance No. 89-38 in accordance with the Local Government
Comprehensive Planning Act; and
WHEREAS, certain property more particularly
described hereinafter is being annexed by the City in
accordance with the application completed by the City for the
owner of the following property, pursuant to the Annexation
Program, by Ordinance being adopted simultaneously herewith;
:i and
WHEREAS, the procedure for amendment of a Future
Land Use Element of a Comprehensive Plan as set forth in
Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, has been followed; and
WHEREAS, after public hearing and study, the City
Commission deems it in the best interest of the inhabitants of
"
I said City to amend the aforesaid Element of the Comprehensive
:i
Plan as adopted by the City herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT:
Section 1: Ordinance No. 89-38 of the City is hereby
amended to reflect the following:
That the Future Land Use of the
following described land shall be
designated as low density residential.
Said land is more particularly described
as follows:
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A"
Section .2: 'luac any maps adopted in accordance with the
Future Land Use Element of said Comprehensive Plan shall be
amended accordingly.
Section 3:
All ordinances or parts of ordinances in
conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
Section 4:
Should any section or provision of this
A certain parcel of land being a portion of TraC~R 10, 11, 1~, 13
a.nd 16 of the Subdivision of t:hg Sou~hg.ast. Q.l1arl9r of Sect-ion 12,
Town$hip 45 South. RanqQ d2 Eact, .c ~.co~d.d in ~let Book 9, Page
14, of the Public:: Rcaeordc of Palm Beach County, Florida;, said.
parcel reing mor. particu13;rl~" C1eeoribed t!l8 follows:
Commencing at t.he soucheas-t corner of -the soutbeas1; .one.
qu:&~~e~ o~ Seet:.ien 1.2; ~henc@ South &9-:33'37" W@Glt along
the South 11Ile: 'Of section 1~, a distance of 40.04 foet.,
to eo point along tbe l'lest Rlgh't-of-way 1in.e of La~rmc~
~Oddi thence North 02.0~'59'. Eas'C, along sud West R1.9bt.
of-Way 11nQt a distance ot 15.01 feet to a point on the
Sour~ line ot ~he aforesaid Tract 16 and the Point of
Begirminq: thence South 89033'37" wt!!St:. along th. Sout.h
line or said Tracts 16, 10. 11, 12 and 13, a distance of
2149.52 feel.: 1:0 the ScuthwQst corner of said Tl:act 13;
t.heno;;;e North 0401100'22" East alal1q the ~..~-t. linea of s~id "
Traot 13. a distance of 1134.39 tQG~ to tho No~weet
corner of said Traci 13; thonQQ Norlh a904eI1~" East
along the l~orth linea of said Tract 13, t.l distance 01'
351. 25 fcu~t to a poin'\: on tee boundary of Plat N~. 2,
Manor rorcac~, as r__oorded'in Pl~t &OQ~ 41, pages 88 and
B9 I Pu.blic Reoord~ of Palm Beach county, l"lorida; then<=~
along said boundary of Plat NO.2, ManOl" Forest, fot' the
next fifteen (l~) described lines being South 82024'49"
El!st, i1 distance o:f 123.71 :feet to a point along the "'last
Ri91lt-or-ws)' J.in." of Manor Forest Boulevard; said point
lyi.ng on a curve concave to thtt Sou-t;.heast. ha..,ing a
cen't.ral angle of 70012'00" and a radius of 410.00 feet.
and .Nhose chord bears Sotlth 05025'20" ~OSlt; i:ho.noe along
the ~rc of said curve, a distance of 502.34 fee~ ~o ~h8
point of compollnd curvature o'f a QUrv.. ooneave to the
Northe;;ist having ~ central. an9~Q of 0C;013 "00" and Ii
rad ius of 127 S . 00 feet and ,-,hQse oh<'t:"a bears Sou~h
32047' lO" Ectst; tho-nee Southe,l)ste:t-ly along t.he arc of
said Clll:"Ve, a d f st:ancQ or 13SL 34 feet: tbencQ Nnrt:b
'3~"O~'2c't E~~tr :) di$t~nr.'1!!: of 7S.00 :Ee~t, to :\l point
along the arc of 0. curVe havinq a centra]_ angle of
10801'7'39" and a :::'adi~s of 90.01) feet:; 'tblimco Sou~be~t'Jt-
erly .:.10n9 t.11~ arc of o;aid CULV,;" .a c:li.gi::.nC1~ of 1.70.11
fe.et '':0 a poLlJt of reverse out:vatur-gi !;,aid turve baving
a c~ntral ~ng.le cf 80"15' 22" :md u radius Qt 210.00 teet;
t:bencR Nurtbet'ts1:et"ly. ;;JIang ~he aro of said curve, a
distancliP of 294.15 foot to ~ POhl't of c;ompol.U1" cu'tVa~ure;
said curve havirl9 a Qonta::'.J. tU13~. Qf 1.20"4~.r(}on and a
radius of' 1E:1L 00 fAet:; thenoe Southeast..rly aJ.ong 1:hQ arc::
of gaid cu~voJ ~ di.t~nc__ o~ 347.74 roe~ ~o a point of
revergo curvature; ~aid c\u~e hav1nq a central angle of
234&0;'41" and a radi.us elf 90.00 teet; t:hence Sout.h~rly
~nd Nori;herll along the arc: of said Ct;J.rve, a distance of
367.74 feet to a point of reverse c~,ture; said Cl~e
h~ving a o~tral angle of 440 DO' 00" and a t-adiuc of
120.00 t~et; th~nceN~rth~as~erly a]~nQ ~hQ arQ of said
curve a distance of 92.15 feet 1:0 a point: of rev.rOe
curvature!- said curve having et r:..nt:ral an91. of 150015'27"
and a red us of 60 leet; 'thmlce No~l:.hea.t:erly elong the
arc ot sdid curve, a distance of 62.05 tae~ to a point at
r~va:rse curV<lture1 said OU]:-VI;I htlvin9 III cent1:al angle or
371)47rSO" al1d a rad1.\1s of 22S.00 f'~ei:., 't:hence Nort.h'West-
~rly along th~ ar~ of caiQ curve, a distance o~ 148.43
feet t:~ a {)otnt of r';\\Ter!le mn.-ra'ture i said curve having
a central an91~ of 77~11r40" an~ a ra~1us ot 75.00 feliPt;
t~~nCQ N01"thw~&::t/Ol1:1y along the arc 01: sa1d curve, a
dlS::tdn~~ of 101.05 ft!et to a 1-.JU:i.Il1;. u.r; teveJ';se curvat.ure;
caid <,urve h~ vin9 a aentral an<;le of 80029'5091 and a
radiu~ of 100.00 ~eet; th~nc~ Ncrthwesterly along the arc
of ~ai~ curv~, a distance of 252.89 fe~t to a point of
reverse curvature; said curve having a ::entraJ. anglQ of
15"41'.~O.' and a radius of :210.00 fQgti themcC! Nor-t:hQ;U~~-
erly along I;he ar::: of s~lid curve, a dlstancQ of 57.52
feet; thenc-e South 87017'3811 East:, ~ di::tano~ of 260.00
feet to a point on thQ East lihQ of th9 a('ore~aid Tract
10; th(~nce Sotlth 02',)421"22" Wa~t( along -:h~ East line ot'
s:\id!'ract 10; a dist~nce ~t' ~52. 15 ~ee-t t:.o the. Northwest
cern..!" of 'the afcra!;aid Tr;ict. 16; ~hence North 89-40'50"
East along thQ Hartl} lltH;~ of said Tra.::t 16, a distallce of
Ei?2.:>.4 f~ei: to .<1 point Of! the r1est 'Righl:-ot-Way line of
L~wrenr~~ Ro:.\d; ~h9no. South 02" 02 r 59" we!:;t along the West
Ri~h~-of-Hay line of La~'-r~nce Road I a <11:St.al1Ce of' 653.85
fr.aQt ~'o the Point of B~ginninCJ.
I
PCN# 00_42-45-12-05-002-0010
00_42_45_12-05~00~-0000
~:1I ..\ \ ...!1
k~\ - - -' ~,--
"~ I \ : .
....... ;:l' L \:J .. . , L 1
'IU-L- ~ .I . ~ __' ~., I .. J . ' ,'.; 0",1
u...-- ,.~_. 11, r!llc._-'p.- . "'~ . d-- ,,'-' "
It--- :: '1 ill (~~._ - i'" . . ; 3. ;l.l'l!!i
" " .' I , ~ .' IlfIIIJ'f .1::/: 16\ '1.. q
. . .... ."",."".!'J' _ ' t \ ,'; S · ... . :, d ~~il
111"~' ~~ ;)f~'~' > _: .. ~ .,'" - : .' · ~. .r" ",~"-'.
,~c .,.;, Ii.. 'l' . "'" ....MIo'.:o... . .' d ..
. \.,' . . . >r-. rt~~1l> I . Cii
'_" r._~l;m.~~ _ .";.J .~; -r-;.' (:. ~(t:1 ~
._\ ~ " : 1 ~:... .(,I.!. t,...! :.!'. '. lt~
.,J~ It'':!. 0' ._';. ",,'~~\\..ls.~~i' \ ":~~;:,"i 1.....
_.. ' : Im~ p ~\] t 1'~" . D . -' · ::3: l;i~I:'lc~ : c )
.\11 .-=...' . It,/t:',-J;. ~l" m ~ I '
, ...~.!!-' .' . '. " . , !." I')'r-o-I "1\':1 . 'l';I1 ., .... --.~, ~
_ A . \It'! ;...., . .' I
~ '~;. .\ 7 ~fJ ". ;::. -' \l~~ I
..... u ' '!II' !-It t ,:.1 'iii . 7: . r
.1" .'",. -' ~ ~~~-fl(" ~~g~~'t ~~." r;.. : . i~" ..::.'-.l i
, 1;;:;1 -, ~ . ~ .... .. . -, -.-..
. " f'" ' , " ,. ., . I " ~ --. . -' ---"
~~ _. ~ c-:- .~. \~ ~ '!.-, . \::- .~ ,.. ..... ~;~ " 1\ i1 n. I)
:il ,~ ~ . ., , ..~.~..' r. . \
)J\' ... '-_ . ~ ~ .);~. .'1'\1' J..\.'" . . -' · rr= ""
lu J ilIll;" n' :1] ,~t, D~: ~,fi1-' I . ..'.. :i~.,. ~I',.!~~
d z \- U, ~\::..\ t' t;'.' I!" ~~OX % 1"\: . '" .,.' '. ";:; --... ~!II""'~" ,
, _ I l)' .,;;'}W.' iff'.'," ..,.' '....~.. t:; ;:"1\i;. f.;J;;I~~;l'C j
~,1--'1l1..........",", \l I'-' 1'.lO\.li! "~.. ~.::4UoAO - :\ t~~. .:\ ... I~ril ' :
"I'!"\~F'!"-"-!''''''''' .- ,..' ~i"l ,.1 . \{]/ ,f" . ..
l~'in-j .~,~ ..:.-r:-~~I::.~-!ii, {:.l,fU" I:.' ';;.' .... ..!,.:.. I'.' . :
" 1'''-'''''' \'W-.'~i?'" ~~.;.4= \.' ~.., " :-/ici -
\e \ \::L~~Xi:~-?~t ~\ ~ ~ i .::;>" !..?~"c~t;:: '.. .;,~" '
. r-' '!F1"A '1!i1i~1 \ 'p j , .. .,. .' .. .Ie'. · .' .,..
. . . Gol.AI". . ~ .,,' '..".l~"" ..-'T.'. ~ --. .I~~ ,.t':l I \ ~B:
. __~?<(. 11' . . .-r.....~ ~ l"""" . . .I!:!'--
1:" .:, 1 ,\1 ",' .1',' ..! ;;;t..... f:""'"' -'- r ,; ~!.
_-\ .' rl"" . . --:-. ~: ~ i ;r.mlt: '-~-::~. · . I'"' ]" I t ~~ '12 .' '~~.;\ '.,;
, 'i\J r1';1 '~'" i~'+' )~ ~ i ~~I'" rJ.
. ' . ~ ~w." -r: ..:'::. ;-{:;. ;..~....~\..w 11, ~II':-'\ IJ' I
. .. \' I:.' ........~ I
_ _ .- " ~. _...., " [I . ..,' \;f:i<. .01
,..0 ~ I ~ ~ MIl ,~..... ;0-"':;' .;, i. [l' ~rJi." . · I J
i'tIItJ;iJ' .~l ~. ~ ..
\IT\ rr.1" m . ~J" III llU !..,.l. !. l. tt'-
IP..III . ,r City o' loyntoft S..ch
t1.lfll'lnl D.pa"""'"
;
..:
" I
f r1 l
J '"
. 'f
! 11
.
..
.
.
.
NaJlle of De"eloplllent/owner- c.~PF/I((' r rA /:!S
Locate the subj~ct property on this map and shade in the area.
Ordinance or any portion thereof be declared by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not
affect the remainder of this Ordinance.
Section 5: The effective date of this Ordinance shall be
the date a final order is issued by the Department of
Community Affairs finding this amendment to be in compliance
in accordance with Chapter 163.3184, F. S. , i or the date a
final order is issued by the Administration Commission finding
this amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Chapter
163.3184, F.S. The notice of compliance becomes a final order
21 days following the issuance of the notice of compliance if
during the 21-day period no petitions are filed challenging
the amendment.
Once issued, the Notice of Intent shall be
! attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made a part of this
ordinance by reference.
FIRST READING this /~
day of
$/9~
, 1995.
SECOND,
~aNG'
FINAL READING and PASSAGE this
dc:J
day of
, 1995.
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
~-==- ~
Vlce Mayor
~
L /L r yL--'V.. {
May<Z5t Pro Tern
",;
/1-
~l~ Y~cL~
ATTEST:
tl. .. rJ,-,~ I //
'ci~fu:k~1t. /~j~/.
(Corporate Seal)
lAWRENCEoAKS.
lANDu;:)E
5/8/95
I
~cN* 00_42-45-12-05-002-0010 !l11r~
OO_42_4S_12-0S_006-~OOO; ~
~:"_'\\..I \ _ 11 . ..: ~
,~\-rt'- .-
'~ I II I : ' . "
~ ~.";;.l ,'" . . ,.
_ _ U [j" ,.' ,..
,-::::i.A-. ,'" --;..: . '" j.)..: \ )j J A- ,!.J ,;, ·
~ "_ JI";!!!!:!- " .. .' "'_r.~ ~;~. ....., '
'Tn . I '- ~ ~S,I ,'!.! ""'" ~
~---t . . II \:-;:- '~l \ '1"::~i;!I\,\1lt.l l ,,''7.: , -1 ~I tl N '
.,...' ,~ .' ,_I I
'" ,:', .= """i,' _ ,\ I;:' :' : ~ ,"~'" f
.' ~l
& B&' . ;i;.:"- ." ., . i... ~ -," ~;",.,. ..;::>.i,. ' d~ ~ "1
~ q \" 'M '. tl'j:c\J;i" ;;:.' ~,' ~ "L-t..\~'i~ . ~"f:'.':l' ~I~ I: d
..' "",r" _ t..--' , /::!Ir ->- w,' I ~(f\~,L:J · ~
_I~'.. ~I :\l~,r' ~- .l.t-~:;; j~'
41 -:::- " I'.' [l~ II O'1"ft: ~ IR l""O"'""" !
... " , .. r -. ' .' 1 \ -
.,J- , . ~~ .' '-~'Q])~~\ ~N' '1~~,~~:~ .~i ',y,;:~~~rl~! I ~ ' I
.-:;;;: ..' ;, . ' l' It. _~.: ' )'U '", ' ~
..~.!!-'~' ' ~ ,.... c." . ',' ,- --.",
"~, (\\.\'1".'. ;." :'1
-.-lL ' E!, .:") ..:'f.Jl \ \ " ":' ~I Ii I'
.1 ' ." r. ' " .' --
~ ~ II ii:'. ,"" Tl " ,:.1'1 .-:.' r" ·
1\ ".... \ il !ii' ~1l....W ~ \ \ IlO - '-",' I . ' :
~R~;'~';,.,,~ 11i'~ 1\1J ~ 1~1 ~~~~\1~iI~ .1lii: .i' . : . r..:,';:;:::
.. f"~" \ i.n L" ,! ..~ .'" .' -....
~\ =. .. ~.~~ I,~ . ~\~ '. t~~:::\ ~~ ,Ow ~ ~- II 1- ,~~~.;J ~ f\ J.~ ~.~ 1
~11'" - ~~ -I ' ~ ~ ~~lI!"" ~'i'\Ii' ..J.~~ - " - - , ~ ~
\) d!Illll;' no ,1 l'~ ~'i'.~'i", ','..." 0" ~ · . ~ .-,-:;;J
" l \1r , I\; u,l:;, q t' (:' . ".w.z "",'. '~"I" 0::......--;;:' ,~(~-';" ,
~' _' l\! ~\. ., · ,t~'.\I:.'j . ',~~ ,c:; t:W~ ,fttj'F!'11 t~ _L.J j
':l ill.. . '\1Jl-~' o,~.. -!!l!:.."...... ~~.;.. ,", ... ,'if! ..
lt7J.\;lrv.;6.~~.~~'~c:"'~'S\CdC"':, ~ !JII'~~ '-~ .1.' -;,h' "~
Ii \ \ IIf:_<;:i::..-~'~ ' \ ::~ ,~j!l'!:'::/. ~,' ~\~, 11{f~'7~~,:::,~~ii'It'r ~:. ' ·
" ' ~ \.""J\:j":\."W~ . I ;,p') · ., . ~ :.' ~~ I' , -~,
. , ., . . ' ...' '1l'" ..:..., ,.., ,..1:'.. 'l<'" " ,-.~ ~:t', , , ; "",'
=C<1i\~' ,~(~.....' .0;<", !a-~:.~J: (.~'::'-fr1 'tt1.1\f, <~'~;~"l~'~ 1;,'. > :
qJ~~ l\~.~~ ~ '<:j '!\\ll( II ~(~:~:~~~;: ~t: ~.",'~ ;.,r~ ,~,t!i" 71\-
\' . rrm"..... ~ .: \ \ \ 1 ~,1''''''''''' . -i1 "c "'... (.~- : ~ I b',
''""I ~ -,' · .-' Ii'~'"'' . . '
\ij \!r - ~ ~~?~~ ~\:.;, ,: "f;J&wII ;~::-:\!' "
_ _' rm ~ .nt' il:~Y.). :.~J ;r.~~1I11 J
.... ., ~~"m' '.. · ; ~A . t. J;Lm . ·
~ \I ,\,\111 ;;;;..! , ..-~ ~j. 1. 1. 1-
, " ,P" ,.' CII., .1 ....... .....
t!1'lt'\I\I oeparU"I"\
Name of peve lopll\en t/O>lner.-01../ f r'tl{ C r". nA I!S
Locate the sub1~ct property on thiS maP and shade in the area.
-------------------
.-_._.~_._---,.-"'.~
: Section 3: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in
II conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
;, Section 4: Should any section or provision of this
i Ordinance or any portion thereof be declared by a court of
"
i,
! competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not
affect the remainder of this Ordinance.
Section 5: This Ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon passage.
FIRST READING this /~ day of #//9~
SECOND, FINAL READING and PASSAGE this
0UA/6 , 1995.
, 1995.
de::::.' day 0 f
FLORIDA
,I
i
:l
Sh^~ ~
Vice ~'ayor 6" .
~ ,.~
t _-{ - ' '
.:-- - l' YV~_ -.t _ J, ;l...A-
MaycJ} Pro Tem
v
/'1
i ATTEST:
I~ ~~
ICi~k
I
I (Corporate Seal)
LawrenceOaks.
Rezoning.5/9/95
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JUNE 20, 1995
T-
to do this.
Commissioner Rosen requested that the workshop include discussion of the formation of a task
force on industrial development. Mayor Pro Tern Matson pointed out that since economic
development will be an integral part of the visioning process, it might be more appropriate to
include this topic as part of the visioning. Commissioner Rosen agreed, and withdrew his
request.
X. LEGAL:
A.
Ordinanc - 2nd Reading: !)!'8L1C HEARING
1. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-14 Re: Annexation - Lawrence Oaks-
Oriole Inc. Property .............................................................. TABLED
2. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-15 Re: land Use Element - lawrence
Oaks - Griole Inc. Property ....................................................... TABLED
3. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-16 Re: Rezoning - Lawrence Oaks -
Oriole Inc. Property .._.............................................................. TABLED
City Manager Parker advised that the agreement with the County has not yet been drafted, and
will take several more weeks. However, we have a deadline with DCA to move forward with
the annexations. The recommendation is to move forward, and staff will continue to work on
the agreement.
Motion
Mayor Pro Tem Matson moved to remove these items from the table. Vice Mayor Bradley
seconded the motion which carried unanimously.
Attorney Cherof read Proposed Ordinances Nos. 095-14, 095-15, and 095-16 by title only.
C~HE;E ~A;-~O ONE~RESENT W~O WISHED TO S;;'AK ATTHE P~;L;~~~
-- -
Motion
-~~'---"-
Commissioner Jaskiewicz moved to approve Proposed Ordinances Nos. 095-14, 095-15, and
095-16 on second and final reading. Mayor Pro Tem Matson seconded the motion. City
Clerk Sue Kruse polled the vote. The vote was unanimous.
23
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JUNE 20, 1995
-1-
to do this.
Commissioner Rosen requested that the workshop include discussion of the formation of a task
force on industrial development. Mayor Pro Tem Matson pointed out that since economic
development will be an integral part of the visioning process, it might be more appropriate to
include this topic as part of the visioning. Commissioner Rosen agreed, and withdrew his
request.
x. lEGAL:
A. Ordinances - 2nd Reading: PUBLIC HEARING
1. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-14 Re: Annexation -lawrence Oaks-
Oriole Inc. Property .............................................................. TABLED
2. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-15 Re: land Use Element - lawrence
Oaks - C>riole Inc. Property ....................................................... TABLED
3. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-16 Re: Rezoning - lawrence Oaks -
Oriole Inc. Property ............................................... .................... TABLED
City Manager Parker advised that the agreement with the County has not yet been drafted, and
will take several more weeks. However, we have a deadline with DCA to move forward with
the annexations. The recommendation is to move forward, and staff will continue to work on
the agreement.
Ii
I
j
Motion
Mayor Pro T em Matson moved to remove these items from the table. Vice Mayor Bradley
seconded the motion which carried unanimously.
Attorney Cherofread Proposed Ordinances Nos. 095-14, 095-15, and 095-16 by title only.
THERE WAS NO ONE PRESENT WHO WISHED TO SPEAK AT THE PUBLIC HEARING.
Motion
Comm issioner Jaskiewicz moved to approve Proposed Ordinances Nos. 095-14, 095-15, and
095-16 on second and final reading. Mayor Pro Tem Matson seconded the motion. City
Clerk Sue Kruse polled the vote. The vote was unanimous.
23
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
\
MAY 16, 1995
L IJ /11< - 1 11 - 0 JI
the vote. The vote was unanimous.
4.
Proposed Ordinance No. 09514-
I nc. Property
Proposed Ordinance No. 095-15
Oriole Inc. Property
Proposed Ordinance No. 095-16
Inc., Property
Re: Lan Use Element - Lawrence Oaks -
;'
I
Re: Rkzoning - lawrence Oaks - Oriole
Re: Annexa' n - Lawrence Oaks - Oriole
5.
6.
Attorney Cherof read Proposed Ordinances Nos. 095-14, 095-15 and 095-16 by title only.
Motion
Vice Mayor Bradley moved to approve Proposed Ordinances Nos. 095-14, 095-15, and 095-16
on first reading. Commissioner Rosen seconded the motion. City Clerk Sue Kruse polled the vote.
The vote was unanimous.
8.
9.
7.
Proposed Ordinance No. 095-17
Condominium Property
Proposed Ordinance No. 095-18
Condominium Property
Proposed Ordinance No. 095-19
Condominium Property
Re: Rezoning - Carriage Gate
Re: Annexation - Carriage Gate
Re: land Use Element - Carriage Gate
Attorney Cherof read Proposed Ordinances Nos. 095-17, 095-18 and 095-19 by title only.
Motion
Mayor Pro Tem Matson moved to approve Proposed Ordinances Nos. 095-17, 095-18, and 095-
19 on first reading. Vice Mayor Bradley seconded the motion. City Clerk Sue Kruse polled the
vote. The vote was unanimous.
C. Resolutions:
1 . Proposed Resolution No. R95-65 Re: Authorize execution of agreement
between the City of Boynton Beach and Howard Scharlin, Trustee for
Woolbright Place, Joint Venture (Tradewinds) ............................... TABLED
Motion
Mayor Pro Tem Matson moved to take C-1 off the table. Vice Mayor Bradley seconded the motion
37
MINUTES - CITY CC.USS~ ...4 MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 17, 1995
.k~J
t;I" ' t
r& <'
,%~6'~~<
O.
Project Narne:
Owner:
location:
Annexation - Lawrence Oaks
lawrence Oaks - Oriole Homes, Inc.
42 acres at the northwest corner of Lawrence Road and
Knollwood Road
land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning: Request to show
annexed land as Low Density Residential and to rezone
from RS-SE (Single Family Residential - Special
Exception) in Palm Beach County to PUO (Planned Unit
Development)
Ms. Heyden stated that lawrence Oaks is a County approved project. It received
site plan approval by the County in 1993 and was recently platted. In June of
1994, the City authorized execution of an agreernent for water and sewer service,
with the condition that the owners would volunteer to be annexed into the City.
Following the recent annexation of the Knollwood Groves property, the subject
property became contiguous and therefore eligible for annexation. This project
consists of 178 units designed as zero lot line patio homes. Staff had provided
an analysis of the zoning issues of that particular approval and how it compares
to the City. Oriole Homes began construction of the site improvements approxi-
mately six months ago. They are the current owners. lowell Homes is the
contract purchaser. They are the ones wha will be pulling the building penmits.
The City is currently negotiating with the County regarding how the property
will be inspected and permitted once it becomes annexed.
The providers of major urban services (Fire, Police,.and Public Works) evaluated ~
this property for annexation. It is within the service area of Fire Station 3,
which has superior service capability compared to the corresponding County sta-
tion. No deficiences are expected upon annexation or anticipated in the near
future.
Description:
Ms. Heyden reviewed the existing and proposed land uses, the existing zoning and
proposed zoning, and the adjacent land uses. The PUD zoning district was
selected because it is the only zoning district the City has that, would respect
-% and ho~r the current- t-ounty--approva 1.- --- ------.
~ WISHED TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF OR AGAINST THIS PROPOSED lAND USE ELEMENT
~~/REZONING. THE~~~RE~_MAYOR HARMENING DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING
Motion
Commissioner Katz moved to transmit the proposed annexation of lawrence Oaks to
the Department of Community Affairs. Vice Mayor Matson seconded the motion.
Mayor Harmening read into the record a memo from the Fire Chief to the City
Manager regarding the annexation of properties west of lawrence Road, in which
it is indicated that Boynton Beach Fire Station 3 provides superior equipment,
more personnel, and quicker response times.
The motion carried 4-0.
.
- 14 -
~ES '-~'----------
, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
.- TON BEACU, FLORIDA -_/
JANUARY 10. 1995
Ms. Burns expressed the oplnlon that the residents would not gain anything for
the extra tax dollars. Vice Chairman Oube advised that they would be receiving
City services which include Police, Fire and emergency rescue services in addi-
tion to refuse collection. Mr. Rumpf advised that the Police, Fire and Rescue
have evaluated the property and indicated that it exists within their service
area. They can immediately take over responsibility at a higher quality than
the County provides. Although sanitation rates will increase, water and sewer
rates will decrease since the City is allowed to charge a premium for water and
sewer to out-of-City residents. Mr. Rumpf advised Ms. Burns that the refuse
collection rates could increase up to $50 more per year if the condos are con-
sidered single-family residences with curbside pickup.
Mr. Weigle inquired as to whether or not the City has noted a rise in property
value because a property was annexed into the City. Mr. Rumpf was unable to
respond since this program has not been in place long enough to be a good indi-
cator. According to the County, properties are not appraised based upon juris-
diction.
Motion
Mr. Golden moved to approve the request to show annexed land as High Density
Residential and to rezone from RM-SE (Multi-family Residential, Medium Density -
Special Exception) in Palm Beach County to R-3 (Multi-family Residential), sub-
ject to the recommendations and findings in the staff report and that it is
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Vice Chairman Oube seconded the motion,
which carried unanimously.
Annexation Progr~ Application '4
Lawrence Oaks
Lawrence Oaks - Oriole Homes, "Inc.
42 acres at the northwest corner of Lawrence Road
and Knollwood Road
Request to show annexed land as Low Density
Residential and to rezone from RS-SE (Single-Family
Residential - Special Exception) in Palm Beach
County to PUO (Planned Unit Development).
Mr. Rumpf made the presentation. He advised that this is a County-approved
project which received site plan approval in 1993. This is the remaining phase
of Fox Hollow. With respect to reviewing and permitting, this would be a simi-
lar situation as exists with the Windward PUO. If annexed, at that point in
time, the City would be responsible for completing the necessary reviews,
issuing permits and making the inspections for a project not reviewed in the
City. The City is working on finding a solution to this problem.
5. Project Name:
Owner:
Location:
Description:
The proposed Low Density Residential land use is comparable to the County.s
Medium Residential 5. The Planned Unit Development zoning district is proposed
as it is the most comparable district to the County's PUO district, and is the
only City district that will accommodate the County approval of the lawrence
Oaks site plan. Staff recommends that the property be zoned to PUO with the
County-approved site plan. Staff conducted a technical review and forwarded
corrments.
- 15 -
.LNUTES
PlANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 10, 1995
Staff recommends approval of the application based on:
1. The subject property is contiguous to the corporate limits;
2. The subject property lies within the City's Reserve Annexation
Area;
3. The annexation of this property is consistent with the City's
Annexation Program; and
4. The proposed land use amendment is consistent with the goals,
objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
CHAIRMAN lEHNERTZ ANNOUNCED THE PUBLIC HEARING.
Janice Burke~ reDresenting Lowell Homes~ reported that she has a master model of
all of the elevations of the models that will be built on the property. Because
of this, the submittal process of any model she sells is not very intense and
she is able to secure a permit within three to five working days.
Ms. Heyden advised that in anticipation of this annexation, the City has
approached the County to see if they will continue the penmitting even though
the property is annexed. So far, there has been no response from the County.
If that proposal is not suitable to the County, the City will take on those
functions. We should have a response shortly. If the County does not support
the proposal, staff will meet with Lowell Homes as soon as we hear from DCA to
make a decision on how the penmitting will be accomplished.
f
Ms. Burke expressed concerns about time delays, and questioned whether the City
has a Master Model Program. She explained the Program for Ms. Heyden, who
advised that the process sounds similar to what we have in place in the City.
Ms. Heyden suggested that Ms. Burke meet with the Building Department if she
wants an answer prior to this returning from DCA.
Dr. B. J. Hunt~ resident of Fox Hollow~ said his board asked that he attend this
meeting and bring back information. He explained that Lawrence Oaks and Fox
Hollow were one property. Fox Hollow was developed and lawrence Oaks was taken
over by the present developer. Both developments are attempting to effect a
separation which the County does not presently recognize.
Ms. Heyden advised that the City is not planning to annex the northern part of
Fox Hollow at this time.
A resident of 7613 Green Lake ~ said his area was not considered for annexa-
tion. There will be a common road with Police protection only up to a boundary.
Chainman Lehnertz again reiterated his earlier remarks regarding investigating
other properties throughout the City for annexation. This property has a very
irregular barrier in terms of service providers. It will be easy to mix up
the locations of the barriers.
- 16 -
NUTES
~tMNING AND DEVELOP~, .T BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 10, 1995
/
In looking at this in terms of land use and zoning, the Board is being asked to
zone something and provide a land use designation for uses with 101 front and
rear setbacks. No setbacks are provided for screen or pool enclosures. While
this might be okay for the County, it is not good for the City. Even staff com-
ments state this is not consistent with what we have in the City. Chainman
Lehnertz stated that he has major problems with this request. Further, as
pointed out by Mr. Rumpf, annexation is not supposed to create pockets. This
application comes very close to creating an unincorporated pocket in the City.
Motion
Vice Chainman Oube moved to approve the request of Annexation Program
Application #4 - Lawrence Oaks, to show annexed land as Low Density Residential
and to rezone from RS-SE (Single-Family Residential - Special Exception) in Palm
Beach County to PUO (Planned Unit Development), subject to staff comments and
that it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Golden seconded the
motion, which carried 6-1. (Chairman Lehnertz cast the dissenting vote.)
OTHER
None
COMMENTS BY MEMBERS
Chairman Lehnertz stated that although the Board normally has legal representa-
tion, there was no representation this evening. There were a number of times
during this meeting when legal counsel was needed. Chairman Lehnertz asked that
staff or the City Commission work on making sure legal representation is avail-
able to the Board.
Mr. Rosenstock said this happened in the past when he was Chainman of the Board.
He feels the City Commission is not reading the minutes of these meetings. He
suggested that Chairman lehnertz contact the City Managerls Office and dictate a
letter stating that the City Attorney was not present and find out whether there
has been a change in policy relative to the Attorney advising this Board. If no
such change has taken place, an explanation regarding his absence should be pro-
vided to the Board.
Vice Chairman Dube expressed his concern because of the fact
mission and the City Attorney were aware that there would be
tion appearing before the Board on one of the applications.
were placed at a disadvantage not having an attorney present
that the City Com-
legal representa-
The Board members
to advise them.
Mr. Golden also expressed his opinion that the Board should have had legal
representation because of the issues that had to be addressed this evening.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting properly
adjourned at 9:35 p.m.
~~.~
GYc(net M. Prainito
Recording Secretary
(Three Tapes)
- 17 -
-.---
M ffi _If_-h~!; ~ilil ~
ill[
PL;\NNING AND ..
ZONING DE.PT. .
Q1yJl
~~<
~k>
, ~T~
WHEREAS, the city commission of the city of Boynton Bea~~.
RESOLUTION NO. ,.f96 ~/J~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZtNG
EXECUTION OF AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH PALM
BEACH COUNTY FOR THE COUNTY'S CONTINUED
ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS AND CONDUCTING OF
REQUIRED BUILDING INSPECTIONS PURSUANT TO
THOSE PERMITS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF "LAWREtfqE
OAKS" SUBDIVISION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DA~.
deems it beneficial to enter into an agreement with Palm Beach
County for the County's continued issuance of building permits and
conducting of required building inspections pursuant to those
permits for the development of the area known as "Lawrence Oaks"
subdivision.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT:
Section 1.
The Mayor and ci ty Clerk are authorized to
execute the agreement between the City and Palm Beach County, a
copy of which is attached hereto ~bit "A"'~
Section 2. This Resolution shall become effective immediately
upon its passage and adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THIS ~ DAY OF ..::::56~B"~ 1996.
CITY
BY:
A~
Mayor
OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
~
,\\\""ur""",~
~"'~ 9EACIf 1~~
~ ,,0 "':;eD'~ ~
s <' .,~\ ~
~.).. ':0 ~
= 0 !Cl: 0 I 4C ::
= CD icr n""": I Q =
.-.0 ^,v . ... ::
~ \)p \9... -J l 4:' ;:
~O~ """-"ol$
~ ~~~,,~
~ .(/~ ~
""'~.., ~,~
~"'IIIIIIII"'''\~
ATTEST:
(.J- ://;i
Commissioner '
\~ (~v~~,_.
,. \(~
Commissioner
~~ (~ --
/~dssioner
/) .
~~~
City erk
.,
~ t. .
~..'
/
RESOLUTION NO. R-83-60-A
RESOLUTION APPROVING ZONING PETITION 82-71, SPECIAL EXCEPTII
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, as the governing
body, pursuant to the authority vested in Chapter 163 and Chapter 125,
Florida Statutes, is authorized and empowered to consider petitions
relating to ~oning; and
WHEREAS, the notice and hearing requirements as provided
for in Chapter 402.5 of the Palm Beach County Zoning Code Ordinance
No. 73-2 have been satisfied; and
WHEREAS, Petition No. 82-71 was presented to the Board
of County Commissioners of Palm Beach County at its public hearing
conducted on 29 July 1982 ; and
WHER~^S, the noa~d of County Commissioners has considered
the evidence and testimony presented by the applL(>Hlt and other
interestedpartJes and the l't3commenrlations of the IJdr'i.OUS county reVle-V-l
and the l'ecommencld t Jons of the Planning COlrlmission; and
WHEP,Ci\S, 'the Board of County Commissioner's made the following
",,:fi,~,~i,~gs of fac't:
1. 'J'tw }H"oposal y,lould be in harmc)J)',,! and compatible
H i.th the p:cesen t and future d~v~' lopment of the
dl'f.;.:i concerned.
NOyl, THF:pr;rOgE, DE IT J:f:SOLVED BY TIn: B(MRD Of COUNTY
COM}lISSIONERS OJ' PAUl BEACH CO!.'i'i'['"{, FLOIUDA, assembled in regular
session this 29th
c:I2<'y' of
,July 1.902
, that Petition
No. 82-71
the petition of r,;J [Fn'/OOD, n. V. and JONATHAN F.
CAMPAIGNE by Henry Skokowski, Agent, for the FURTHER SPECIAL EXCEPTION
TO ALLOW A PLANNED UNIT Di~ELGrMENT on the North 1/2 of Tract 1, and
all of Tracts 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 16 of the Subdivision of
the Southeast 1/4 of Section 12, Township 45 South, Range 42 East,
as recorded in Plat Book 9, page 74, less rights-of-way for Lake Worth
Drainage District Lateral Canals L-19 and 20 and less the right-of-
way of Lawrence Road. SUBJECT TO an encroachment on that portion of
-
aforesaid Tract 13 described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection
of the West line of Tract 13 v.rith the North line of Tract 15 of the
Amended Plat of Section 12, Township 45 South, Range 42 East, recorded
in Plat Book 9, page 74; thence run South along the West line of Tract
13 a distance of 132 feet to a point; thence run Easterly on a line
. .
.
.; 't: ' -,_.
parallel to the Easterly extension of the North line of Tract 15 a
distance of 14 feet to a point; thence run Northerly a distance of
132 feet, more or less, to a point in the Easterly extension of the
North line of Tract 15, which point is 23 feet, more or less, from
the intersection of the West line, of Tract 13 with the North line
of Tract 15; thence Westerly along the Easterly extension of the North
line of Tract 15 a distance of 23 feet, more or less, to the Point
of Beginning, as described in Official Record Book 3272, page 1935.
Said property located on the west side of Lawrence Road, being bounded
on the south by L.W.D.D. Lateral Canal No. 20 and being bounded on
'.
the north by L.W.D.D. Lateral Canal No. 19, was approved as amended
subject to the following special conditions:
1. Significant on-site vegetation shall be preserved.
2 . Petitioner' shall construct at the time the north entrance
a. Left turn lane, south approach.
3. Petitioner. ahall construct at the time the south entrance
road to L:::tHrence Road is constructed:
1. Left turn lane, south approach.
Peti tionel' nhall contribute Seventy ThowWlld Seven Hundred
and Twenty .five Dollars ($70,725.00) tOWdt'c] the cost of
meeting thlfl. project IS dir\ect and identif.i.clhle traffic
,;impact -to be paid on a pro-rata basis a't tIle time of the
.filing of each plat.
.. ' ;~.,
, '
5. The devel,.>pi?-r shall take t'easonable preca;ltions during the
developmeTlt of this project to insure that fugitive part-
iculates (Just particles) from this proj~ct do not become a
nuisance to neighboring properties.
6. The develop2[' shall t2~e necessary pr~cautions to insure
there ",Jill IJe no pol].lttant run-offh'orn this project to
adj acent or ned.rby Silr face watt~rs.
7. Developer shall dedicate to Lake Worth Drainage District,
through Qui.t Clcd,m IH.3ed or an Easement,- the North 45.00
feet of Tracts 1-1\ inclusive, for the right-of-way for
Lateral Canal No. 19 and the South 35.00 feet of Tracts
10-13 inclusive and Tract 16 for the right-of-way for
Lateral Canal No. 20 all according to the subdivision of
the Southeas t 1/1[ 0 f Section 12, Township 45 Sou-th, Range
42 East, as recorded in Plat Book 9, page 74.
8. The gross density of Parcel A shall not exceed 1.0 dwelling
units per acre.
9. The gross density of Parcel B shall not exceed 3.3 dwelling
units per acre.
10. No structures in Parcels A
Plan, Exhibit #3.
--..........-1
Cl..I.l.u.
B as designated.on the Master
11. No structure shall be constructed within 50 feet of the
project's entire eastern property line, including parcels
A and B as designated on the Master Plan, Exhibit #3~
with existing vegetation to remain within the first 25 feet.
12. No residential structures shall be constructed in the project's
northeast corner within 660 feet of Lawrence Road.
... ... ~. fI
r
13. A continuous 6 foot opaque screen consisting of native land-
scaping and a 6 foot security fence and wall shall be con-
structed in accordance with the notations on the project's
Master Plan, Exhibit #3, along the entire contiguity with
abutting private properties along the eastern property boundary
14. Based upon additional aerial study of the subject areas, it
is further recommended that staff work with the petitioner
and developer at such time that site development commences
to insure identification and preservation of significant
native vegetation.
15. North pool area shall be resticted to daylight hours and
ad~lts only (to be incorporated into Homeowners Restrictions).
16. Petitioner shall retain onsite the first one inch of the
stormwater run-off per Palm Beach County Subdivision and
Platting Ordinance 73-4, as amended.
Commissioner
Koehler
, moved for approval of the petition.
.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Bailey
, and upon being
put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Norman Gregory, Chairman
Peggy Bvatt, Vi~e Chairman
Bill n~dley, neflllier
DennIs Koehler, Nember
Fran): router, npfflber
Aye
Nay
Aye
Aye
Aye
: The foregoing l'u:lolut:ion was c1w<1.ared c1uly pasEjcd and adopted
this
'18th day of
January 1983
, confh)fll i IIg action of
29 July 1982.
APPROVE AS TO FORM
AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
f'ALI'! BEACH COtHf'j"{, FLORLD.A,).~",:,:"l~,~~;: .>.::;;:'.
. , ~': ..,.,., I 1('.' - -... '. ,,,,, ...,
BY ITS BOARD 0 I' COUNTX. ~;~"~'(~"","""""..:.." ','
. ".' "l, \ \1. .,
Cot1NISSIONERS .::.~::,.;" /",: \ S'. S'; , (p ~ ........
, >':. ,." \. \to- '-.... 1"'.
.JOHN B. DUNKU;, Clerk .~~~,;..' (','< ",-",-:p'
;' "'{.) -- '. r......
, .! (.... f..\ . " . ,,?
By:X~LL\,~/~~3~/~ J~,~cJ;" ~ ~
. D.~ puty Clerk :- ;/[, . \. n .~
:. ,r',.............,;
',.;,>)0 ~~. 4,.. ,>" ~
. -::"'" ~ ,,".y !'<
. ", v J;~ ('/ i"~ ~,,"'."
. '';, 41 ..., \t. "..."-.
""'-';"'.' :"Y,lr:. '10.. 'I. .1"."'\\'\ 'J;
~ /?~-
/ County Attorney
..J
.~
."
,.',....
RESOLUTION NO. R-83-60 0)?
RESOLUTION APPROVING ZONING PETITION 82-71, REZONING
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, as the governlng
body, pursuant to the authority vested in Chapter 163 and Chapter 125,
Florida Statutes, is authorized and empowered to consider petitions
relating to zoning; and
'WHEREAS, the notice and hearing requirements as provided
for ln Chapter 402.5 of the Palm Beach County Zoning Code Ordinance
No. 73-2 have been satisfied; and
WHEREAS, Petition No. 82-71 was presented to the Board
of County Commissioners of Palm Beach County at its public hearing
conducted on 29 July 1982 ; Rnd
WHERr;l\~), -the BOClt.'d of County Commissioners has considered
the evidence and l'f~3 timony presented by the appl LCclnt and other
interested part It-' ,'" and tll(~ r8cormnendCltions of tltf~ vilr'ious county reVle\.J
agencies and the r't-~comrw~nrja t ions of the Planning C:C"illOission; and
WHEvr:.!',r:, t.he Boa.r'u of (:rJlJnty CommissiulP,r's made the follovling
findings of.fact:
1. i'hl, I'roposal HOll L,I bf;~ in hannony dnd compatible
,I] ! h the present ,mrl future c1evf: Lopment of the
Il',,~a concer'n.,~d.
NOH, 'ril;:i~I~F'ORE, 13r IT FCSOLVED BY Tl-n: BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS or FAl)'1 nEACH CC)f'itf L'Y, FLJOIUDA, aS~3emb1ed in regular
session this
29th
day of
July 1982
, that Petition
No. 82-71
the pe.tition of f'rnFTHOOD, H. V. and JONATHAN F.
CAMPAIGNE by Henry SkokU\-];"3l,j , Agent, for the REZONING, FROH AR-AGRICULTUPi
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, TN F'i\:~-f, M~D RE-RESIDENTIAL ESTATE DISTRICT,
IN PART, TO RS-RESIDENTIAIJ S INGLE FAMILY DISTRICT
on the North 1/2
of Tract 1, and all of Tra~ts 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 12, 13 and l~ of the
Subdivision of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 12, Township 45 South,
Range 42 East, as recorded in Plat Book 9, page 74, less rights-of-
way for Lake Worth Drainage District Lateral Canals L-19 and 20 and
less the right-of-way of Lawrence Road. SUBJECT TO an encroachment
on that portion of aforesdid Tract 13 described 2S folloHs: BEGINNING
at the intersection of the West line of Tract 13 with the North line
of Tract 15 of the Amended Plat of Section 12, Township 45 South,
. ,J
Range 42 East, recorded in Plat Book 9, page 74; thence run South
along the West line of Tract 13 a distance of 132 feet to a point;
thence run Easterly on a line parallel to the Easterly extension of
the North line of Tract 15 a distance of 14 feet to a point; thence
run Northerly a distance of 132 feet, more or less, to a point in
the Easterly extension of the North line of Tract 15, which point
is 23 feet, more or less, from the intersection of the West line,
of Tract 13 ~ith the North line of Tract 15; thence Westerly along
the Easterly extension of the North line of Tract 15 a distance of
23 feet, more or less, to the Point of Beginning, as described in
Official Record Book 3272, page 1935. Said property located on the'
west side of Lawrence Road, being bounded on the south by L.W.D.D.
Lateral Canal No. 20 and being bounded on the north by L.W.D.D. Lateral
Canal No. 19, was approved.
Commissioner J(oehler
, moved for' cl.ppr'uval of the petition.
The motion was seconded by Commiss:ic.ner
Bailey
, and upon being
put to a vote, tl18 '.10 te ~hlS ,'1[; follclws:
Norm,<,I1 I~r'f:;gory, Chairm:1JI
Peggy I.Vi"J t:t:, Vice Chail'fwm
Bill 'h:ii.Jey, Memher
Denn i::; Knf.~hlm', l-tembec
FraIlL f'r/~1tel', Hember
Aye
Nay
l\.yc
Aye
Aye
The' foregoing l'i~Lolution \-1('1:'; (h"'~lat'ed duly pa~;'jcd and adopted
this ,18th
day cr
LTanuary 19W3
, confLcrning action of
29 July 1982.
APPROVE AS TO FORM
AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
PALN BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA", " ,",>
BY ITS BOARD OF cou?\r~.,J,:,,<,.:~,:,,' ,::~' r J,..:'j::,
,}'~".fI;"\.~..~;!....:'.", ,,\\\....( {..~......,. '.'
COMMISSIOllTERS .;,\~,,~,;':;>o~i' "", It..". ",,,(:
a l !'~ )"J"..!. ....'f: '. . '.~, ...." ~ C" l '.
';"<:"',"",\ ",~ .,' \ \ ~, " , (J: 1-' .... 'I
:",.":~:.'i' '"..... ...~. . rt ~,'
JOlItJ B. DUNKLE, Cl2rk:> ...\" ,. t .':--',...r- r""
..'\;~ .;, " .......~'. .. ;J. . ,
, :_,; ,:" '".' "'t.}- ..I"
By: ~OCXLtLt~c3',icC0i-'tj;' ,~ ~
\ Deputy Clerk, :}..', -;; (; ~
:._y,: ~.( :., ~", ".J (, "
." ; " , ~ ;- ",
~{:/-: .':':."'.,.:J (/" , ~ ~ :'
',";f;'" ". o{)o ~ ~ '"
: \}~f,f.~\",:,""'",,~ -,..,: \' \ ,\""
$C
'~~y
CORRESPONDENCE
&
LETTERS
.._,..._' ~.. ._.___._. ,"'_,',,__'" _..._....._.__.~___..._.,__ .____ "n_. ..
,12/08 '97 10:89
ID:PZ8-ZDNING
FAX:5612885167
PAGE
1
loanl (If Cnunty COl11ntisNillnl'rs
.~ I? r~l ~ ~ W ~ rn
Ls 12J
! lJ I
IU1i rrR 3 1997
1 L! r-l'". -
!
j
I PLANNING AND I
ZONING OEPt
Cuunty Adminisll'illor
Rol.>l'rl W,'i~m<ln
'('Il I., l;oro;lo.'r, Cll;liTll1;m
hut ^~\rol\son, V iCI' ('11.'11'111.\1\
~(lr...n T, Mil/":Ui'
::0\1'01 A. R()I"'rl~
"",,IHPn II. N"""..II
Allr)' Md "lrty
A.llld" Ford r .1'0'
cp.lrlltll!nl of II J.'U\ni ng, Zoning & nuilding
Llln in~ OJ vision
ZONING RECEPTIONIST: (407)233-5200
ZONING FAX NUMBER: (407) 233-5165
m THE ATTENTION
FACSIMILE COVER SHBET
OF: ;;im8R) Ii ~A.J
FROH: ou., ....__L. Martin Ilodgk;lnsz. Zoning DirQc'toL"
DAPE: P-.-~ 1f.L
NUMBER OF PACES (INCLUDING COVER SHEE'.l': 0- .
Pleas9 call ~e at 233-5206 Dr .Y ~ecrotdrY, Datty Harlow, at 233-
5234 if you have any quest;jon3 or problemB. Thank you.
COHHBN'l'S:
'/\n !-:quJI Opl'uriunily - Af(irll1,llivl' ^(II\l11 LrnplllYI'I'
~
j,;:1 prl/;!..,1 (),u",:y";",i """'" 10f) A\IJ;lr,.li,Ill i\V(,llllC Wc~t P,llm B('olCh, FIIJriJ.. :'\:141)/, (407) 233.50(l() h\X: (4ll7) 2:"H-'i165
~,~
tI;2'/03 '97 10:40
Depilnment or PI.nolo..
Zonmll IL B"Udlnll
JOO Australian Avenue
Wnsl P~lm F\M~,11 Fl. 33406
(E61) 2.1:1.5000
1I(r IIWWWmrIl1m'!:leIKI1 nus
.
P..... Bl!!ild. eQilJnl,.
80ard of County
Comml..loncr.
P.Hn AMOnSOl1, CI1.urman
Maude Furd Lee. Vice Chait
l\al~n r Mar(US
Carol A Roherts
Wan.." H. New..!l
M.uy Mc:C.my
Ken L. FUb1d
C::OUqty I\dmlnll1:TIItDr
Rohert Wr.1~man, P.F.
".4 ~ F.qualOppc>rtllnirj"'
A/.firf'M'llil.''' A.{"tir~n ri'mll/,~,..".,.~
@ pi/,,- "" --ydad".".,
ID:PZB-ZONING
FAX: 561:2885167
PAGE
:2
~~:\. "'Ur.@ ~ ~ w rn
W FFR _ 3 007 rn
PlANNING AND
tONING DEP!
February 3, 1997
Ms. Tambri Heyden, Planning and Z(.)ning Director
City of Boynton Beach
P,O. 80x 3lO
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
re; Lawrence Oaks Planned Unit Devolopmenl
Deilf Tambri:
I have spoken with Mr. Michael D. Smith of Lowell Homes rega.rding the
proposed alterations to the ca.bana within the Lawrence Oa,kg Planned LJnit
Development (PUD), Gen~ral1y. such alterations ate handled on an
adminisLratjv~ level by our Development Review Committee stan: provided
the alterations are consistent with the overall project approval and there is no
encroachment into required setbacks,
If you or your staf1'have specific questions regarding the f;,ite plan approval1br
the property, please do not hesitate to contact Ms, }'usun Mutgan (561/233-
5042) or me,
L Martin Hodgkins, Ale
Zoning Director
cc: Michael D. Smith, Lowell Homes
Barhara Springthorpe, Greenberg, Traurig, et al
f:\u~r:r\mh,Jdgkin\lllwTOnIc~. I
Department of Planning,
Zoning & Building
100 Australian Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
(561) 233-5000
http://www.co.palm-beach.fl.us
.
Palm Beach County
Board of County
Commissioners
Burt Aaronson. Chairman
Maude Ford Lee, Vice Chair
Karen T. Marcus
Carol A. Roberts
Warren H. Newell
Mary McCarty
Ken L Foster
County Administrator
Robert Weisman. P.E.
"An Equal Opportunity
Affirmative Action Employer"
@ printed on recycled paper
f~ ~--
~
~LOANNNING AND
" ING DEPt
February 3, 1997
Ms, Tambri Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director
City of Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
re: Lawrence Oaks Planned Unit Development
Dear Tambri:
I have spoken with Mr. Michael D. Smith of Lowell Homes regarding the
proposed alterations to the cabana within the Lawrence Oaks Planned Unit
Development (PUD) Generally, such alterations are handled on an
administrative level by our Development Review Committee staff, provided
the alterations are consistent with the overall project approval and there is no
encroachment into required setbacks.
If you or your staff have specific questions regarding the site plan approval for
the property, please do not hesitate to contact Ms, Fusun Mutgan (561/233-
5042) or me.
L. Martin Hodgkins, AI
Zoning Director
tl.
cc: Michael D. Smith, Lowell Homes
Barbara Springthorpe, Greenberg, Traurig, et al
f:\user\mhodgkin\1awroaks.l
fJJie City of
rJ3oynton '.Beat}i
100 ~ 'BoyrUtm 'Beadi ~
P.O. ~Jl0
'BoynUm '&4di, :FWritfa JJ42$-OJ 10
PHONE: (561) 375-6280
FAX:. (561) 375-6357
001
rr;,\. ~@~nwrn
I I' -
~ ' v J 1
\U~ NOV 13 9J)
\
l
! PLANNING AND
1 ZONING DEPT.
OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER
(i k ((l, ,.--
,~)
cl ~7',A'&/
~.,.! /
/ / ~~
0/~
November 12, 1996
Jere Smingler, President
Manor Forest Homeowners Association, Inc.
4110 Manor Forest Boulevard
Lantana, Florida 33462
Re: Lawrence Oaks PUD
Dear Mr. Smingler:
Thank you for your follow up letter of November 7. The thrust of your letter seems to be that
you are not comfortable with my responses to your earlier letter. That being the case, it would
serve no useful purpose for me to personally respond to additional questions. By copy of this
letter I am asking City Attorney Cherof to provide responses which hopefully you can aCGept.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
/t~~ #tiM/
William Hukill, P.E.
City Engineer
WVH/ck
xc: Carrie Parker Hill, City Manager
James Cherof, City Attorney
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Anthony Oechiuzzo, Building Permit Administrator
C:MANORI
Jtnuril4 's rja.uway to tnt rjutfstream
- 'Tfte City of
r.Boynton r:Beacli
"~~'
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Buu:fJ 'Boukvarrf
P.O. 'Bo~310
'Boynton 'Buu:fJ, 1"lorUfa 33425-0310
City 1fa[[: (407) 375-6000
j'5U: (407) J75..(;()9()
October 22, 1996
Mr. Jere Smingler, President
Manor Forest Homeowners Ass.
4110 Manor Forest Boulevard
Lantana, FL 33462
Dear Mr. Smingler:
Please be informed that we are in receipt of your letter and as the subject matter of your request
pertains to the permitting process of the City, we have forwarded it to Mr. Hukil who administers
the permitting process through his Building Division of the Development Department. Also, to
ensure proper expediting of any future requests which also involve the permitting process, I
would recommend that subsequent correspondence be provided directly to Mr. Hukill. Thank
you.
Sincerely,
//" . -;J~ ,;'
( I "
-,- L .~<:Llt .9, .f.:VtJ<e,v
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP
TJH:mr
cc: Carrie Parker, City Manager
Bill Hukill, Director of Development
Dorothy Moore, Plans Reviewer
Jim Cherof, City Attorney
MR:FH-SMING
51merUas ljateway to tfu ljulfstream
rn
. FoxJ!Vllow
MANOR FOREST HOM E OWN ERS ASSOCIA TI
4110 Manor FOrlst Boulevard
Lantana. Florida 33462
O~1obc:r 17, 1996
This letter is to put Bo)'nton Beach on notice to the following fads,
.
1) J.'ots #129. #130, #131, #131, #112, #123 and #124 aloog Manor Fore!it Boulevard
In the }.ll"rence Oaks P. D.D. ....oot on Plat #2 orManor Forest as recorded In Palm
Beach Count.y.
1) This land ls platwd ror a 20' roadway with no sldewalk on the west side and no
"alky curbing, which Is conslstel1t with the a~sthctjcs of tile cl:lstlng community.
J) This l_Uld Is private pl'opcrt3' and owned .by the :Manor Forest Homeowners
Assochltion, Inc()rporat~d. '
4) The Dwnns oUh" pro))'lrt)' hllve ne\ler authorwd conlitrud'oQ or IlppUed'ror
permits fur this road construction.
5) Any changes In the plat would require the notification and approl'aJs of the
ownurs.
I .__
, '
Oil
~.nHr~.
J '::;:1/ @
PLANNING AND
ZONING OEPT.
~
I OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Jim Cherat
City Attorney
FROM: Carrie Parker
City Manager
DATE: July 10,1995
SUBJECT: Lawrence Oaks Interlocal Agreement
The County has now taken the position that the City should draft the Interlocal Agreement
regarding Lawrence Oaks (see attached letter trom Barbara Alterman). Please review the
attachments and set up a meeting with Tambri and Bill Hukill to develop a draft Interlocal
Agreement. Thank you.
{'~~~vU?- h~
Carrie Parker
;", ~:: >"~"'~'~~"-----,,,-,--,,,~
ii,,). :,'; (,-.: .,.".' I'-! [1..f.1 r-.'m
IU)~n,
UU JUl I ,,, 'll
I
CP :smb
c: Tambri Heyden (with attachments)
Bill Hukill (with attachments)
PZLANNlNG AN()
ON/NG DEP[
'"
S:ICMICARRIE\SLAWRENC.wPD
Board of County Commissioners
Ken L. Foster, Chairman
Burt Aaronson, Vice Chairman
Karen T. Marcus
Carol A. Roberts
Warren H. Newell
Mary McCarty
Maude Ford Lee
County Attorney
Joe Mount
RECEIVED
June 27, 1995
JUL fi \995
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33432
ATTN: Ms. Carrie Parker,
City Manager
RE: BOYNTON BEACH INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT/LAWRENCE OAKS
Dear Carrie:
subsequent to our recent telephone conversation regarding the
timing of an Interlocal Agreement needed by the City of Boynton
Beach, I spoke with Kurt Eisman, Kris Garrison and other County
staff. It was suggested that the City of Boynton Beach take the
initiative of drafting and presenting an agreement to the County
staff for review and comment.
When Palm Beach County staff is approached by a municipality
requesting an agreement, it is generally the municipality which
presents initial drafts for review. After agreement is reached,
the City can execute the document which is then presented to the
Board of County Commissioners for their approval. .
I enclosed for your review a memo from Kurt.Eisman outlining
some of the issues that were discussed at the meeting with you and
your staff and which must be addressed in the draft agreement.
In addition, pursuant to our meeting, the following provisions
must be included:
1. provisions regarding who will handle plats and required
improvements.
2. Conditions of development approvals must be incorporated
into any development approvals granted by the City unless
the City'S conditions are more stringent.
"An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer"
nCT:f
-::::: .'Ylnred on recycled paper
P.O. Box 1989 West Palm Beach, Florida 33402-1989 (407) 355-2225 Suncom (407) 273-2225
FAX: (407) 355-4398
Page 2
June 27, 1995
Interlocal Agreement with the
City of Boynton Beach
/
3. The agreement should not be piecemeal but should address
the issues on a global perspective.
a. If no permits are issued by the County, just site
plan or zoning approval is given, then the City
should take over full responsibility. The trigger
for permitting responsibility should be where the
project enters the process.
I also enclose for your review a sample agreement that Palm
Beach County has developed. Please feel free to utilize it.
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Kurt
Eisman or Kris Garrison.
Si)lPerely,
~~
Barbara Alterman,
Assistant County Attorney
BAles
Ene.
cc: Kristin Garrison, Executive Director, PZ&B
Kurt Eismann, Director Building Department
g:\common\wpdata\landuse\cstewart\ila.bb
06/26/95
16:21
PALM BCH CO PLNG ZUN 1/'l:i J:lL.1.ll:i 1JI::I-'
10101
.
INTER-OFFICE COMMUNICATION
PALM BEACH COUNTY
PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
FROM;
Kurt Elsmann, Director Building Division
TO:
Darbal.a Alterman, Assistant County Attorney
DATE:
June 26,1995
RE:
BOYNTON BEACH LIMITED INTE
Boynton's request for the Palm Beach County Building Division to provide plan
review and inspection service for specific subdivision(s) within its political jurisdiction
raises some interesting questions and concerns.
Along with the standard language contained in our typical interlocal agreement. the
folJowing must be resolved:
. A time certain limitation to the agreement. not dependent on the percent of build
out in the subdivision. I am concerned that the agreement could turn into the never
ending story. Perhaps a general understanding on this point could be reached as to
its approximate limitation, and then we could terminate the agreement.
. The city would need LO adopt our codes for the subdivision.
. Once the termination of the agreement takes place, the Cit.y will be responsible tor
thc completion of inspections and issuance of the Certificate ot" Occupancy.
. Permits for ancillaJ:Y SUUCture5 following the completion of the primary structure
will be issued by the County in order to eliminate inspection confusion. The City
may not agree with what our ULDC allows in these instanCes.
Please let me know if you need further clarification on these issues. 'll1anks for your
persistence.
kfe/ma8l1ldiDlIo. ..fa
c: Dominic Sims
JUN-26-1995 16:41
407 233 5020
94%
P.01
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
This Interlocal Agreement is made the day of
, 199_, between the city of
a municipality located in Palm Beach, Florida (hereinafter "CITY")
and Palm Beach County, a political subdivision of the state of
Florida, '(hereinafter "COUNTY"), each one constituting a public
agency as defined in Part I of Chapter 163, Florida statutes.
WIT N E SSE T H
WHEREAS, section 163.01, Florida Statutes, known as the
"Florida Interlocal Cooperation Act of 1969" authorizes local
governments to make the most eff icient use of their powers by
enabling them to cooperate with other localities on a basis or
mutual advantage and thereby to provide services and facilities
that will harmonize geographic,. economic, population and other
factors influencing the needs and development of local communities;
and
WHEREAS, Part I of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, permits
public agencies as defined therein to enter into inter local
agreements with each other to jointly exercise any power,
privilege, or authority which such agencies share in common and
which each might exercise separately; and
WHEREAS, [insert particulars]
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual representations,
terms, and covenants hereinafter set forth, the parties hereby
agree as follows:
section 1. Purpose
The purpose of this Agreement is to [ ]
section 2. Definitions
The following definitions shall apply to this Agreement:
"Act" means Part I of Chapter 163, Florida statutes.
"Aqreement" means this Interlocal Agreement, including any
amendments or supplements hereto, executed and delivered in
accordance with the terms hereof.
[insert others as needed]
section 3. ReDresentative/Monitorina position
The COUNTY'S representative/contract monitor during the term
of this Agreement shall be
whose telephone number is (407)
The CITY'S representative/contract monitor during the term of this
Agreement shall be ,
whose telephone number is (407)
section 4. Effective Date/Term
This Agreement shall take effect upon execution. The term of
this agreement shall be for a period of [ ].
and shall continue in full force and effect up to and through
[ ] unless otherwise terminated as provided herein.
section s. services Rendered
section 6. Responsibilities and Duties
CITY agrees to:
COUNTY agrees to:
section 7. Pavments/lnvoicinq and Reimbursement
CITY (COUNTY) shall submit monthly invoices to COUNTY (CITY)
which will include a reference to this Agreement, identify the
2
[project], and identify the amount due and payable to CITY
(COUNTY) . Invoices shall be itemized in sufficient detail for
prepayment audit thereof. CITY (COUNTY) shall supply any further
documentation deemed necessary by COUNTY (CITY). Invoices received
from CITY (COUNTY) will be reviewed and approved by
, indicating that expenditures have been made
in conformity with this Agreement and then will be sent to COUNTY'S
(CITY'S) Finance Department for final approval and payment.
Invoices will normally be paid within thirty (30) days' following
approval.
Section 8. Fundinq Source
[Ad valorem, general funds, specific funds, etc.]
section 9. Access and Audits
CITY (COUNTY) shall maintain adequate records to justify all
charges, expenses, and costs incurred in performing the work for at
least three (3) years after completion of the projects. The COUNTY
(CITY) shall have access to all books, records and documents as
required in this section for the purpose of inspection or audit
during normal business hours.
section 10. Administration
section 11. Renewal
This Agreement may be renewed [ ].
section 12. Breach/Opportunitv to Cure
The parties hereto expressly covenant and agree that in the
event either party is in default of its obligations herein, the
party not in default shall provide to the party in default thirty
3
(30) days written notice to cure said default before exercising any
of its rights as provided for in this Agreement.
section 13. Termination
This Agreement may be terminated by either party to this
Agreement upon [ ] days written notice to the other
party.
Section 14. Enforcement Costs
Any costs or expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees)
associated with the enforcement of the terms and/or conditions of
this Agreement shall be bor~e by the respective parties, provided,
however, that this clause pertains only to the parties to this
Agreement.
section 15. Annual ADDroDriation
Each party's performance and obligation to pay under this
agreement is contingent upon an annual budgetary appropriation by
its respective governing body for subsequent fiscal years.
Section 16. Notice
All notices required to be given under this Agreement shall be
deemed sufficient to each party when delivered by United states
Mail to the following:
COUNTY CITY
Name
Name
Address
City state Zip
section 17. Delegation of Dutv
Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to authorize the
Address
City state Zip
4
delegation of the constitutional or statutory duties of state,
county, or city officers.
section 18. Filinq
,
A copy of this Agreement shall be filed with the Clerk of the
Circuit Court in and for Palm Beach County.
section' 19. Liabilitv
The parties to this Agreement and their respective officers
and employees shall not be deemed to assume any liability for the
acts, omissions, and negiigence of the other party.
Further,
nothing herein shall be construed as a waiver of sovereign immunity
by either party, pursuant to Section 768.28, Florida Statutes.
section 20. Indemnification
CITY agrees to protect, defend, reimburse, indemnify and hold
COUNTY , its agents, employees and elected officers, and each of
.
them free and harmless at all times from and against any and all
suits, actions, legal or administrative proceedings, claims,
demands, damages, liabilities, interest, attorney's fees, costs and
expenses of whatsoever kind or nature whether arising in any manner
directly or indirectly caused, occasioned or contributed to in
whole or in part, by reason of ,any act, omission or fault whether
active or passive of COUNTY, of anyone acting under its direction
or control, or on its behalf in connection with or incident to the
performance of this Agreement. CITY'S aforesaid indemnity and hold
harmless obligations, or portions or applications thereof, shall
apply to the fullest extent permitted by law but in no event shall
they apply to liability caused by the negligence or willful
5
misconduct of the COUNTY, its respective agents, servants,
employees or officers, nor shall the liability limits set forth in
768.28, Florida Statutes, be waived.
Section 21. Insurance
The CITY shall, during the term of this agreement, and any
extensions hereof maintain in full force and effect, general and
[property] insurance, which specifically covers all exposures
incident to the intent and responsibilities under this Agreement.
Such insurance shall be with a company acceptable to the COUNTY
Risk Manager and in an amount of not less than [ ]
for [ ] and to support the CITY'S
agreement of indemnity. Policy ( ies} shall be endorsed to show Palm
Beach County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, as
an additional insured as its interests may appear; and shall also
provide that insurance shall not be canceled, limited or' non-
renewed until after thirty (30) days' written notice has been given
to the COUNTY. Current certif icates of insurance evidencing
required coverage must be on file with the COUNTY at all times.
CITY expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection
furnished by CITY shall in no way limit its responsibility to
indemnify and save harmless COUNTY under the provisions of Section
20 of this agreement.
section 22. Amendments
This.Agreement may be amended [ ]
section 23. Remedies
This Agreement shall be construed by and governed by the laws
6
Board of County Commissioners
Ken 1. Foster, Chairman
Burt Aaronson, Vice Chairman
Karen T. Marcus
Carol A. Roberts
Warren H. Newell
Mary McCarty
Maude Ford Lee
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
Department of Planning. Zoning & Building
Zoning Division
July 5, 1995
G. r~-~ R ~ [i~ --n\Vr ~- w.
, IS l!!J l' 'j l5
\ ~ r ~~'.~-:~ ~
I PLANNinG MlD ,-a.. '1
i ZONING DEPT. i'
Ms. Tambri Hayden
Director of Planning and Zoning
City of Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
re: Lawrence Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD)
Dear Tambri:
As you requested on June 23, 1995, attached is information
regarding the County's approval of the Lawrence Oaks PUD. If an
interlocal agreement for the project is to be completed, I would
suggest including the site plan, conditions of approval, etc., as
they relate to this project.
Please do not hesitate to contact at 233-5234 me if you have
any questions or require further information.
~
AICP 1
cc: Kris Garrison, Executive Director, PZB
Kurt Eismann, Building Official, PZB
Barbara Alterman, Assistant County Attorney
Imh:\common\lawoaks.1
"An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer"
@ p,inled on recycled paper 100 Australian Avenue West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 (407) 233-5000 FAX: (407) 233-5165
Board of Cou"ty Commi55ion'~
Ken l. Fosler, Chairman
Burt Aaronson, Vice Chairman
Karen T. M~rcus
Cuol A. Roberts
W~rren H. NeweU
Mary McCart)'
Maude ford Lee
407 355 3990 P.01/04
tq~HTY ADMl"STRATOI
BobW.lna&1l -JJ
/ c r;f, /l.wJ1VU~
/;,fj; r /', : '" &AJt
4//,' ". I
iJ/
~~~,
~tl:;>'"
< ()t;, "'ll'/, ~'''' '
'~'O~.11~ /
~f:l 'V I
"-""'''"-,,, I'
/ ,
JUN-~;;-199:> 14:44
BOARD O~ CC
PALM BEACH COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FAX TRANSMITTAL FORM .
Following this cover sb..t is/ue S page(s) (not inolud1.Qg tbe cover
.heet). If uy part of th11 mes..ge 1s 1Ii..ug or reeeLve4 poorl,., plea..
call the receptionist at 401/355-2001. Thank you. ,
DATI:
TO:
, -
~ - J- ~)
TIME:
HAMI:
{I4,e..e ; ~ I",~k~
DEPARTMENT/COMPANY:
TEL.EPHONE No.:
tJ/ ~1' /'~.4,y-l-6~/L ~'Y/'VP'I',v 1Jf','cj.
FAX No.: s?.>- "0/1
4>..<.d'
FROM:
NAME: ;;! [jl/t -r VA-)I2u4,
r
DISTRICT O"ICE: ~A~~
TILEPHONE Mo..t 3.)r> JJv~
...
,11 7'/V-ro tv' d f:"foL
FAX No.:
MESSAGE:
F.(.~,
-An Equal Opportunity - Affi~atLv. Action Employer-
P.O. lOX 1989, WEST PALM BEACH. fL 33402-1989
,,~~Ut,t~1~
p'
'"'-..
~tj;)Y' #'~ ~ ~#'v~
J~ '~~ \
,> ,,' ( !..oj ~ -'.
, f . .-, '" ..~. l ::, ·
tf~ 1) '. V ~~ '7f'liY .0 ~i' ~b ~ ". :., L'
. . ~~ / II I y.rvy ~ ').:.....>-- ~
, ~ .1' ~.
~ i ~.
I . f'\. l . I ,\ ,,(. , . ~,(
{ ~ .~I ~~ n' & 8~. /'. . . _,,' ''C'!> ()\'\.".'
, ,\ V.. p1~I' {....11.'.
U ,Gl-r(lf j~. " " ,~
).y.~~~; Jf. "k~~dv1',..,._.'''-'' ,.
~ - V -,-,.-
y \:'~~..-
. ! IJ; 'i
c.t ? i;.'~L 'fJ./
RECEIVED
JUN 9 1~'i~
CIlY MANAGER'S OFFICE
__1 ~J ~JJJ ~~.~~
OW~LI WI"" I.A..
407 355 3990 P.02/04
"Warren H. Newell
County Commissioner
District III
301 North Oliv~ 1\ venue
1 ~th Floor
We~t PalIn Beach, FL 33401
(407) 35S.2203
~AX 355.3990
June 9, 1995
Honocilble Jerry Taylor, Hayor
City or Boynton Beach
100 Bast Boynton Beach Boulevara
Boynton Beacn, Florida 33435
Dear Mayor Taylor:
On !I'uesday, June f, the Board o~ Cotmty Commi..ioners approved the
updated 5 Year Road Plan tor Pal~ B.ac12 County. '1'his mid-year
review i.ncl udec:l the adc:li tioD o~ tbe widening o~ Lawrence Road ~ro1D
tNO lanes to five lanes during tbe 97198 fiscal year. The
persistence o~ the Ci ty staff and the residents is to be coJ1J1tlended
in e~fectively movi.ng this project up.
T.bank you for .11 your belp ~jtb tbis issue. I look forward to
continue "orking "ith you to address tbe conaernB or the residents
in both the Ci ty and the surro~ding u.cincorpora ted areas. If I
can be of ~urther assistance please do not be$itate to call on me.
Sincflrely,
d--
Warren H. Newll
District III Commi~sioner
attachments
c:
Ci ty COllUlli..:t on
Carrie Parker, City Hanager
UN:ub. t.ylor.J.
> ",1"1.-1011 ~1II1_r
JUN-cl~-l~~~ 14:4~
BOARD OF CC
407 355 3930 P.03/04
LI8TXBa 07 CBAlGI. PRQH 'RlVXOU8LY ADOPTBD (12/20/.4)
aOM PROGJW(
ADDIIIO..
10th Avenue North (Construction)
Military Trail to Congress Avenue
Belvedere Road and Haverhill Road (construction)
Bxtend Center Turn Lane.
Crestwood Boulevard (Construc'tion)
Folso. Road to Okeechobee Road
Lawrence Road (Construction)
Gateway Boulevard to Hypolwco Road.
Melaleuca ~n. (Construction)
Haverhil1 Road to Military Trail
School Board Related Traffio
Signal Installations
silver Beach Road (construction)
Congress Avenue to Avenue S
Smith Dairy Agreement
completion of Requirements
DBLBTIO.~
!!911
ADVAl'CID
Congress Avenue (Construction)
Miner Road to Bypoluxo Road
Indiantown Road (Construction)
130tb Avenue to Jupiter Parms Road
Jog Road (Construction)
Clint Moore Road to North of civic Center
DBLAYBD
Congress Avenue (Construction)
Blue Heron Blvd. to Nortblake Blvd.
Flavor Pict Road (Construction)
West of E-3 Canal to Military Trail
FolsOD Road/crestwood (Construction)
state Road 80 to Okeechobee Boulevard
Forest Hill Boulevard (Construction)
at Southern Boulevard (C-51 Canal Bridge)
Jog Road (COnstruction)
North of civic center to Linton Boulevard
Miner Road (Conlltruction)
Lawrence Road to Congress Avenu.
Northlake Reliever (construction)
Garden Road to Convr... Avenue
prosperity Farms Road (Construction)
Archi.'. Creek Bridge
G:\Jf'06l)f9S.1
Adopte4
(12/20/'41
98/99 ,
96/97
96/97
A40pte4
(12/20/t4'
94/95
95/96
94/95
94/95
94/95
94/95
94/95
94/95
.ropo..lS
97/98
97/98
96/97
97/98
97/98
95/96 & 96/97
96/97
94/95
.l:'opO..4
97/98
95/96
95/96
PrODO..d.
95/96
96/97
95/96
95/96
95/96
95/96
95/96
95/96
30ard of County Commissioners
(en L. Fos{er, Chairman
3urt Aaronson, Vice Chairman
(aren T. Marcus
:=arol A. Roberts
Harren H. Newell
\1ary McCarty
\1aude Ford Lee
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
Department Planning, Zoning & Building
January 13, 1995
Mr. Michael W. Rumpf
Senior Planner
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
RE: VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF WINDWARD P. U . D., ROYAL MANOR MOBILE
HOME PARK, CARRIAGE GATE CONDOMINIUM AND LAWRENCE OAKS
Dear Mr. Rumpf:
Thank you for submitting notice of the City's intent to annex the
above referenced areas. On behalf of Palm Beach County, the
Planning Division has completed its assessment pursuant to our
11 Interim Annexation Policy. 11 For your information, I have enclosed
a briefing sheet on the review process.
The findings of our review are as follows:
1. Planninq Division: The proposed voluntary annexations are
consistent with the statutory requirements of Chapter 171,
Florida Statutes (F.S.) Our findings are as follows:
a. Windward P.U.D.: Although this area is reasonably
compact, it is not contiguous to the City's boundaries.
However, if Royal Manor Mobile Home Estates is annexed
prior to the Windward P. U. D., then the contiguity concern
would be satisfied.
b. Royal Manor Mobile Home Estates: Chapter 171, F. S.
precludes annexation of finger areas. Although this area
is finger-like in appearance, it is not contrary to the
compactness requirement of the statute because the
property itself is shaped like a finger.
c. Carriage Gate Condominium: The area is reasonably compact
and contiguous to City boundaries.
Boynton Beach Annexation
Page 1
Four Areas
"An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer"
@ printed on recycled paper
100 Australian Avenue West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 (407) 233-5300
~
/
d. ~Lawrence Oaks (a/k/a Manor Forest P.U.D.): The area is
reasonably compact and contiguous to City boundaries.
However, the City is not annexing the entire P.U.D. but
only that portion of the P.U.D. that is not fully
/ developed. Accessibility to that portion of the P.U.D.
(maY be a problem. Another problem pertains to the
administration of zoning and building codes while the
P. u. D. is being developed. These issues should be
resolved prior to annexation.
2. Enaineerina Deoartment: No comments offered.
3. Fire-Rescue Deoartment: Persons residing in Windward, Royal
Manor, and Carriage Gate would receive approximately the same
response time in the City as they would in the County.
Persons residing in Lawrence Oaks could be better serviced by
Palm Beach County Stntion 43.
4. Water Utilities Deoartment (WUD): No comments, as the
properties are outside the County Utility Service Area.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and respond to the proposed
voluntary annexations. Please be advised that the comments
represent staff review and not the position of the Board of County
Commissioners.
Cordially,
('. ',_ 't~ ~J ~\UQt,- ~
David J. Kovacs, A.I.C.P.
Planning Director
p.c. :
External Distribution List
Honorable Warren H. Newell, District 3 Commissioner
Robert P. Banks, County Attorney's Office
Iva Barnett Grady, County Administration
Bevin Beaudet, P.E., Deputy County Administrator
Allan Ennis, Traffic Engineering Division
Don Grund, Parks and Recreation Department
Lawton McCall, Water Utilities Department
Diana Newcomer, Sheriff's Department
Kathy Owens, Fire-Rescue Department
PZ&B Distribution List
Kris K, Garrison, Executive Director, PZ&B
Beth McCall, Zoning Division
Earl Hahn, Planning Division
Boynton Beach Annexation
Page 2
Four Areas