REVIEW COMMENTS
STAFF COMMENTS
MEADOWS 300 TRACT B "BAYTREE"
MASTER PLAN MODI~ICATIO~
Building Department
See attached memo
Planning Department
See attached memo
I"
MEMor.ANDUM
TO
Carmen Annunziato
Planning Director
DATI
May 4, 1988
~ILI
~"O"
Don Jaeger
Building Department
SUaJICT
MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION:
MEADOWS 300 TRACT B
"BAYTREE" (REDUCTION IN REAR
SETBACK FOR LOTS ABUTTING CANAl
As a condition of approval for master plan modification, the following
comments should be incorporated into the related documents by the applicant:
1. On the plat document there exists a ten foot utility easement on
the rear of lots 19 through 32. No construction can encroach into
this easement. This requires that the proposed rear setback be
modified to ten feet rather than the eight feet currently indicated
on the site plan.
2. The note on Exhibit A should read "Table 600" rather than Table 60.
3. Lot 33 is unique to this request due to the fact that it does not
border on the canal. Homes in the adjacent PUD (Clover Bend) have
a fifteen foot rear setback with a ten foot setback for pools and
screen enclosures. A change in the rear setback for lot 33 would
not be consistent with the setbacks in the adjacent project.
The applicant's prompt compliance with the preceding comments will insure
a timely permitting process.
DJ:bh
XC: E. E. Howell
j
,
)
r '
, f~
.~- .-----....1
. <
~<
;.
M E M 0 RAN DUM
May 10, 1988
TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
FROM: CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
FE: MEADOWS 300 TRACT B "BAYTREE"
STAFF COMMENTS
Please be advised of the Planning Department's comments in
connection with the above-referenced request for a master plan
modification:
The applicant is requesting an amendment to reduce the rear-yard
setback from 15 feet to 8 feet to allow for the addition of
screened porches and Florida rooms for those lots with rear-yards
abutting the L.W.D.D. L-20 canal (lots no. 19-33). At the May 3,
1988 Technical Review Board meeting, two inconsistencies were
noted with respect to this request: (1) There is a 10 foot wide
utility easement which abuts the canal that would preclude the
reduction of the rear setback to 8 feet; and (2) the rear-yard
for lot no. 33 does not abut the canal, whereas the remainder of
the lots included in this request have rear-yards which abut the
canal. The applicant, who was in attendance at the Technical
Review Board meeting, agreed to modify his request to eliminate
the inconsistencies noted in items no. 1 and 2 above. Therefore,
the request has been amended to read as follows: a reduction in
the rear-yard setback from 15 feet to 10 feet to allow for the
addition of screened (covered) porches and Florida rooms for
those lots with rear-yards abutting the L.W.D.D. L-20 canal (lots
no . 19 - 3 2) .
c!a ~ /~~
CARMEN s. ANNUNZIAT6 -
CSA:ro
cc Central File
h t'c \\
___LJE;6;i>-":J!~.s_3f~Q__ r/1jt- C-.L--=-__'{I__1/t ! L/S}=f:_ _
N<J (o.f{}{ E); rs