REVIEW COMMENTS
MEMORANDUM
TO: Vincent A. Finizio
Administrative Coordinator of Engineering
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden
Senior Planner
DATE: June 21, 1991
SUBJECT: Meadows 300, Heatherlake -
Release of performance bonds
Please be advised that there are no outstanding Planning
Department issues relative to the above-referenced project.
TJH:cp
, :11_ ~~
den71.
f{e
o;F
cY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
June 14, 1991
TO: ALL TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS
FROM: Vincent A. Finizio
Administrative Coordinator of Engineering
RE: MEADOWS 300
HEATHERLAKE
REQUEST FOR FULL RELEASE OF PERFORMANCE BONDS
Please be advised that Attorney Lee Gordon, representing the developers of
Heatherlake requested a final inspection for the above referenced project,
including a full release of all outstanding sureties. Please confirm in
writing within ten (10) days from receipt of this memorandum, as to whether
or not your department has any outstanding issues. If your department has
outstanding issues, please list them in a punch list fashion, ,if not please
confirm that you have no objections to the releases in writing.
Thank you in advance of your anticipated cooperation in this matter.
VAF/ck
cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
Lee B. Gordon, Esquire (sent via fax #(407) 833-4209)
v.':'
-RECEIVED
JUN 14
PLANNiNG De-PT.
1'-
-
MEMORANDUM
November 19, 1987
TO: CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
FROM: JAMES J. GOLDEN, SENIOR CITY PLANNER
RE: LAKESHORE/HEATHERLAKE AT MEADOWS 300 PUD
Concerning the proposal by Ryan Homes that there be one Master
Homeowner's Association and one Master Declaration of Protective
Covenants governing both subdivisions, please be advised that
when the site plan for the Lakeshore recreation facility was
reviewed by the Technical Review Board, the parking requirement
was recommended to be one parking space per 1,500 square feet of
pool and deck area. Although this parking calculation was not
consistent with the parking requirement for pools set-forth in
the zoning regulations, which primarily concerns public pools, it
was consistent with established policy for private swimming pools
serving limited areas within Planned Unit Developments, where the
residents are within convenient walking distance of the swimming
pool. It was on this basis that the one space per 1,500 square
feet of pool and deck area was recommended. Furthermore, at the
time of review for the Lakeshore application, there was no
indication that the residents of Heatherlake would be sharing
this recreation facility. If this information had been
available, a greater parking requirement would have been
recommended.
Based on the above, it is recommended that the request to
designate one Master Association for both projects be denied,
unless additional parking can be provided consistent with
recently amended Section 11.H.16.c.12.e of Appendix A, zoning.
~t.~
~ES J(I GOLDEN
JJG:ro
cc Central File
\
.\;,\.,.
\}
MEMORANDUM
24 November 1987
TO:
Peter L. Cheney, City Manager
FROM:
Carmen S. Annunziato, Planning Director
RE:
Lakeshore and Heatherlake at the Meadows -
Request by Ryan Homes
The purpose of this memo is to comment on the request by Ryan
Homes to combine the Homeowners Association for LakeshoLe and
Heatherlake.
As noted in the attached memo from James Golden, parking for the
rec~eation area ,in Lakeshore was calculated based upqn most,
residents walking to the recreational facilities. Adding
Heatherlake to the Lakeshore Association changes the assumptions
upon which parking calculations were based.
Therefore, it is recommend~d that the,City object to combining
the associations, unless the parking issue is readdressed.
C-4~ - ,.r~
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO
jbks
cc: Torn Clark
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
October 12, 1987
TO: PETER L. CHENEY, CITY MANAGER
FROM: CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
RE: MEADOWS 300-MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
Russel Kiviniemi, agent for Ryan Homes~ has requested a
modification to the previously approved master plan for the
Meadows 300 PUD~ The modification requested is to allow for the
addition of screened enclosures for the lake front and canql
front lots, and swimming pools with screened or fenced enclosures
for the interior lots and the lots with rear yards abutting
Meadows Boulevard (see attached correspondence). The approved
building setback for the lake front and canal front lots is
fifteen (15) feet, while the approved setback for the interior
lots and the lots with rear yards abutting Meadows Boulevard
is twenty-five (25) feet. The proposed changes would result in a
twelve (12) foot setback for the lake front, canal front and lots
with rear yards abutting Meadows Boulevard, and an eight (8) foot
setback for the interior lots.
The procedure for approving master plan modifications in planned
unit developments is twofold. First, the City Commission must
make a determination as to whether or not the changes requested
are substantial in nature. A determination of substantial change
on the part of the City Commission which has sole discretion in
this matter, would require a new application for PUD. On the
other hand, a determination of no substantial change allows the
forwarding of the request to the Planning and Zoning Board. The
Planning and Zoning Board then may approve the request. This
procedure appears in Appendix B, Section 12 of the Code of
Ordinances.
With respect to the changes requested by Mr. Kiviniemi, the
Technical Review Board (TRB) met on Tuesday, October 6, 1987 to
review the plans and documents submitted, and they offer for your
consideration, a recommendation that the City Commission make a
finding of 'no substantial change for the requested modification,
and that the Planning and zoning Board approve this request '
subject to the attached comments from the Building Department and
Utilities Department.
La.-- /'< ~
CARMEN S. ANNUN ZI~J{'O
CSA:ro
cc Technical Review Board
Central File
- ---. . . -:=r- ~
STAFF COt-1MENTS
MEADOWS 300 TRACT L "HEATHERLAKE"
MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
Building Department
See attached memo
Utilities Department
Subject to developer
obtaining approval
,fLow 3vuthern Bell,
Florida Power and
Light and otl1er
utility companies
utilizing easements.
:u......
-
....---
MElv\ORANDUM
'0
October 7, 1987
Carmen Annunziato
Planning Director
OATr
"1LI
Master Plan Modification:
Heatherlake Tract L
Meado\o.1" 300
(Addition of screen enclosu~~s
and s\vimming poo 1 s)
As a condition of master plan modification approval, the following comments
should be incorporated into the related documents by the applicant:
:"-'011
Don Jaeger
Building Department
~U.JrCT
1. No construction will be permitted in easements. Sheet 3 of 4 of the
paving and drainage plans shows portions of these structures
encroaching into the easement.
2. Approval of the applicable utility companies should be secured for
the proposed construction immediately adjacent to the utility
easements. Future excavations in these easements could undermine
these proposed structures.
The following comments are for the applicant's information:
In order to facilitate the permitting process, the following documents
should be submitted in duplicate to the Building Department for review
at the time permits are desired:
,
1. Engineered shoring details, as required by plat language, to
maintain the required lake bank slope.
screen enclosures:
A copy of the blueprints for the structures with a current
approval stamp from the Palm Beach County Building Code Advisory
Board or blueprints signed and sealed by a registered engineer or
architect in the state of Florida attesting to the fact that the
structure meets or exceeds all design criteria for the City of
Boynton Beach. These blueprints or copies must be legible and
all pertinent details must be color coded or circled.
A plot plan showing all setbacks to the property lines as well
as existing and proposed structures and easements.
A layout and erection plan for the proposed structure showing
locations of all openings.
A properly completed permit application form.
pools and decks:
Engineering on pool construction.
Plumbing and electric diagrams.
Details on deck construction.
A plot plan showing all setbacks to the property lines as well
as existing and proposed structures and easements.
Details on the required fence or enclosure.
A properly completed permit application form.
The applicant's prompt compliance with the preceding comments will insure
a timely permitting process.
2.
For
A.
B.
C.
D.
3. For
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
DJ:bh
, ,
Don~d:~