REVIEW COMMENTS
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
TO:
Tim Cannon
DATE
March 9, 1990
DEPARTMENT
Planning Director
APPROPRIATE ACTION ~
EVALUATION/RECOMMENDATION []
FOR YOUR FILES []
ACTION DESIRED PRIOR TO
o
o
o
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
NOTE AND RETURN
OTHER
SUBJECT: Six Annexation Applications submitted by Kilday & Associates
As you are aware the City Commission at Tuesday evenings Commission Meeting
relative to the Agenda item of six applications submitted by Kilday and
Associates for annexation, land use element and rezoning took the following
action:
1. Recommended to continue the processing of the six applications and
,directed staff to process accordingly.
2. Recommended that the three sites under the three acre rule be processed
accordingly as if they were in fact three acres or more.
Both of these recommending actions by the City Commission are to occur
simultaneously, therefore, I ask that your department move forward in an
expeditious manner on these applications. Your prompt attention is
appreciated.
~~~
J (Scott Miller
City Manager
JSM: j c
RESPONSE:
TO: J Scott Miller
The above information has been forwarded to the applicant.
RECEIVED
Date (Action Completed) ~/;ll/1'/)
{ , I
MAR 9 1990
, ~:'_" /" "--',;7 PLANNING DEPT.
Slgnature ",?-'};,~~;:;". /./ /~-;1!/r<t'.-h
/'.. '/ V"- =:-
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
@
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435-0310
(407) 734-8111
OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR
March 5,: 1990
Kilday & Associates
Attn: Kieran J. Kilday
1551 Forum Place, Bldg. 100A
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
RE: Boynton Beach Annexations
Dear Mr. Kilday:
The Planning Department has reviewed your letter of February'13,
1990 and the additional items submitted. Our comments are as '
follows:
General Issues
l. The proposed .80 acre service station is currently a portion
of a 25.3 acre parcel which is proposed to be annexed as
part of the Mal~ South application. Therefore, this parcel
can be zoned PCD and it is not intended in the Comprehensive
Plan that the .80 acre parcel be removed from the 25.3 acre
parcel. Concerning the proposed Mall Corner Restaurant and
Retail/Oil Lube applications, these two parcels do not meet
the minimum acreage requirements for rezoning to PCD.
However, it is the intent of the Comprehensive Plan that the
above parcels be combined as part of a unified development,
rather than developed on a piecemeal basis. Because these
parcels fall within Planning Area 7 of the Future Land Use
Element Support Documents, any rezoning to other than the
PCD zoning district would be inconsistent with the adopted
Comprehensive Plan. As noted by the Interim Planning
Director, the word "should" as opposed to "shall" has no
bearing on this matter as far as DCA is concerned. In order
to place these three parcels in the C-3 zoning category, an
application for a text amendment will be required. Only one
application would be necessary to amend the text lanaguage
for Planning Area 7 to cover all of the parcels which lie
within this area.
TO: Kilday & Associates
-2-
Mar. 5, 1990
2. The DRI issue is scheduled to be reviewed by the City
Commission at the March 6, 1990 meeting.
3. As documented in the description for each application in the
February 13, 1990 correspondence, staff is aware of the
ownership issues. Concerning the proposed Mall South Parcel
(49.52 acres), this parcel is being placed in a commercial
land use and zoning category and the analysis of impacts on
infrastructure are required pursuant to the City of Boynton
Beach Zoning Regulations (Section 9.c.4). In addition, this
information will also be required by DCA, as outlined in the
last paragraph of the February 13th correspondence.
Concerning the status of the six applications, the following
items noted in the February 13, 1990 correspondence are still
outstanding:
I. Proposed Service Station
Item no. 1.
II. Proposed Mall South Parcels
Items no. I, 3 and 5. concerning item no. 3, the signed
original that was submitted does not include Ernest Klatt's
signature. The photocopy of only Ernest Klatt's signature
on page 7 is not acceptable. The original page 7 of the
application should be removed, signed by Ernest Klaff and
returned, or a new fully signed original of page 7 should be
submitted.
III. Proposed Mall Corner Restaurant
Items no. 1 and 4. The signature of the applicant is still
missing from page 6 and the original signed copy should be
modified accordingly.
IV. Proposed Retail/Oil Lube
Item no. 1.
v. Knuth Road PCD
Items no. 4, 5 and 8. Concerning item no. 4, an original
signed copy is necessary.
VI. Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD
Items no. 4 and 7.
The above items should be submitted in two copies for standard
zoning districts and 3 copies for planned zoning districts. Six
additional copies of the subdivision master plan for the
rezonings to PCD will be required for review by the Technical
Review Board (9 total).
TO: Kilday & Associates
-3-
Mar. 5, 1990
If you have any questions concerning the above, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNTO~ BEACH
rf~
JAMES J. GOLDEN
Senior City Planner
JJG:frb
cc: City Manger
Central File
KildayII
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM 90-035
TO:
J. Scott Miller, City Manager
Timothy P. Cannon, Interim Planning Director r-~
THRU:
FROM: James J. Golden, Senior City Planner
DATE: February 23, 1990
SUBJECT: Applications (6) Submitted by Kilday and Associates
For Annexation, Land Use Element Amendment and Rezoning
The Planning Department has notified the applicant that the
above-referenced applications are incomplete (see attached
correspondence dated February 13, 1990). Whether the
applications are complete is important, with respect to meeting
the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance,
since only previously approved projects and complete applications
received before February l, 1990 are exempt from this ordinance.
If the City processes these applications, it is possible that the
City will be challenged by Palm Beach County, insofar as
exemption from the Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance is
concerned. In addition, it appears likely that several of these
applications either separately or when considered together, may
constitute a Development of Regional Impact (DRI).
With respect to the above, the City Commission should consider
requesting a binding letter from DCA regarding DRI status. The
reason for this request is that the site exceeds one of
thresholds set forth in Chapter 380, Florida Statutes for a DRI
(40 acres for retail uses, or 30 acres for office uses).
.Jtrl.);.fll
ES f. GOLDEN
JJG:frb
Ene
cc: Central File
PM90-035
..
't,.
,.. ~
...: ~
c
'-
I
1'i ,I "
"'~ . i
"',' i
I I
'::;1 It., \
,
0:::;' . ,
I
I ,1"
! ' ' .
, , ., I
I I
I ,~ :':..
"
"'">IV "
I ~ ?~
, oo 0:
QOO
..: "'l.-'"
"'">' . .
l
t
~i ~,
,..!.
"
I
..1
, ,
:;:
~
.
'0.:
-:11'::;,
- 0
.J. -
f' ^ ';:l~::
V "'~., .
"Z
o
-
I-
0...<(
<(0
~':J\
c..
ZQ.-
0<(.
o 1-<( ..."'::~_ <:::triO. "'t ';".~I
....J . r," t.. \ ~2L --r' :~
>< Q : -, oj. ;.t,\ I...~ I .:,) r N : Lf ~ I ~
~ I~ ' , ' :ri ,,:. ~ I I ' :'1' " \ ~ f - I .. I 1
... ..... ol\" ~' ". ~ I
W ~I ~ Il: '" . "r r j I~. .Ct1. 0)J. .._..._
r \., J,' I.l..J .
"1 .,..' , I ~ - III ,I ..
Z ~ ' .-fU---.....'~:- <l:t.' 1':::<' t~
Z ~ <: /_, ~. ," ~ ~~.~ ~ .....'....
· c :, ~, ....... L~ ; 8 u \ 1 it :v.
I' ,I ...... 'v) .. 'I;:;i~ \ ,....
<( . i', <: "5c' . - ....p... - .
" >- ' .. ;<l:.. '1
g f ~ ,0 : ~ ..\ ~ ~ : hl
~ ~ --;,~. -' ~ ~ ~"i"';~' .
~I ~.; .. ~\ ,) ~:',: . . .' ~ - - " ,
- ~ ... "''', ' I
Q ~ _:r,_ ; ''\ \ %.. 'tj J c
~ "," . ,\.." ;)".'
"" ", ..~. .....:
~.,~. I ~I' '.
- . if :L~(
...' \ .dol. , c;
.. 'l:ic:! S3~v, aooM>I'tJ _-
1'j1rm~j;:?~.: 1,' r:J~/:~(.... '~'; ,ljl~I;,l7~~i~\?0~; ~
:;:, :'!I I ~ ,) \ \ ~\\ : ~
I ~: :., 2'3"[' : ,::==;::: ~ _ 'S\;~=:,\o,,;,,'1 ~
I \ 0 ~ i' . t:: <:-1 ; I~ ~~ I) l:':! \" I... .J.
'- "" il.:..:=:J/~' I _ I - ~
I ~ :-:':-:.J: 1-""': 1.:-'- ~ r;,-- r--:-,
\:;'~j =\~;:l'\ I. . ,I.., I ':0'="'"
~I
I
""
., u
l'\1~
,S1
,co':
.
... .4,.. ,', I.......... .. II......... II.. II a. ..... ..... ......... ... ...
I' ......................... - .~............ ... 't...... ~.~ .......
Cl . ..................... ........t .......';......... ......,.~.......
.....,........ ... .....~........ ......................... . ......
<( ". ... .... ..... ............ ..~......................... .......
O ... I........~...... ... ..... 11"1' U' ....... ... ....... I'~" .....
.. I" ..... 11.0. II.......... .''4,:.4.... ......... ...... ... r II .....
l:t: .......... II 'i' II.. 1,..:......,..4'.... 1,.".. II ....... 1.......
:::::::::::::::: ::~.. II n I,: ::t::~:::::::; ::: ::: :::::;:::
................... U. '.~...............,...............
.. ......... ..:-.... t . .~.\...... ........ ~""""i""'"
...................... ....... .:........ ,... ....;...... ..,.. .....
.............!l'.......... .............. ...................... ....
.... ......................... -........ ...... .,... .... ..........
........... ............ ............... .,......... .... .,... ....
:::::: :::::::::::::::::::: ::::C ::::: ::::::: ::: I:: ::::::;: :::::.
.~ .:: ::::: :::::~:: :::::::;::::::r ...;;.:;::::::::::::::::::t:r:: A :
I
~
('
c
",.(
,
'"
...
I- ~ ~
:. III ~
~ w ~ olj
~
'..., ~M
I ~
Z t I
0 to 'r.,.
l- f l~l~_
Z ~
>-
0 "-
CD
...
\' ~
i ~
~ '.'" ~- ~
.
. ~
. W
,I Z "
I!) C
, C
r.
.'
\,
o c:
Parcel Existing Proposed
Reference Owners Acreage Zoning Zoning
A Bill Ray Winchester
Elsie A. Winchester
Ernest Klatt 49.44 AR C-3
B Bill Ray Winchester
Elsie A. Winchester 0.80 AR C-3
C Mall Corner, Inc.
(c/o Schroeder & Larche) 1.34 AR C-3
D Bill R. Winchester
Elsie Winchester
William A. Zeiher
Michael A. Schroeder 2.44 AR C-3
E Charlene Boynton
Donald Lowe
University of Florida
Foundation, Inc. 14.76 AR PCD
F Winchester Family
Partnership 13.87 AR PCD
Tot a 1: 82.65 ac.
,\
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P. 0, 80x 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435.0310
14071734.8111
r
OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR
February 13, 1990
Kilday & Associates, Inc.
Attn: Kieran J. Kilday
1551 Forum Place, Bldg. 100A
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Dear Mr. Kilday:
Please be advised that the Planning Department has reviewed the
six applications submitted on January 31, 1990. Our comments are
as follows:
, \
. ,
" ,
I. 'Proposed Service Station (.80 acres) at southwest corner of
North Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road owned by Bill
Ray Winchester and Elsie A. Winchester (applications for
annexation, land use element amendment and rezoning).
The following items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
(1) Since the proposed zoning category does not comply wtt};l
the text language for Planning Area 7 of the Future
Land Use Element Support Documents, an application for
a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment.
(2) An additional copy of the property owners' list, tax
maps (photocopy acceptable) and affidavit.
(3) The water/sewer impact statement required pursuant to
items 6 and 7 on pages 4 and 5 is based on comparison
of existing and proposed zoning categories and not '
existing and proposed land use categories. The
statement also does not indicate that calculations are
based on the standards adopted by the Palm Beach
County Health Department.
I
I .
TO: Kilday & Assoc
-2-
Feb. 13, 1990
II. Proposed Mall South Parcels (49.52 acres total) located on
the east and west sides of Winchester Park Boulevard
between Old Boynton Road and Boynton Beach Boulevard, owned
by Bill R. Winchester, Elsie A. Winchester, and Ernest
Klatt (applications for annexation, land use element
amendment and rezoning).
The following items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
(1) Since the proposed zoning category does not comply with
the text language for Planning Area 7.f of the Future
Land Use Element Support Documents, an application for
a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment.
( 2) An additional copy of the property owner~' _ list, tax
maps (photocopy acceptable) and affidavit.
( 3 )
( 4 )
(5 )
, ,
Pursuant to item c(l) on page 3 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, written consent to the
processing of this application from Ernest Klatt.
I ' \ ,
Pursuant to item d(3) on page 4 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, a tree survey which
meets the requirements of the City of Boynton Beach
Tree Preservation Ordinance.
Pursuant to item h on pages 4, 5, 6 and 7 of the Land
Use Element Amendment/Rezoning application, a compari-
son of the impacts that would be created by develop-
ment under the proposed zoning with the impacts that
would be created by development under the existing
zoning, which shall include:
(a) A comparison of the potential square footage or
number and type of dwelling units under the existing
zoning with that which would be allowed under ~h~
proposed zoning or development.
(b) A statement of the uses that would be allowed in
the proposed zoning or development, and any particular
uses that would be excluded.
(c) Proposed timing and phasing of the development.
(d) A comparison of traffic which would be generated
under the proposed zoning or development, with' the
traffic that would be generated under the current
zoning; also, an analysis of traffic movements at the
intersections of driveways that would serve the
property and surrounding roadways, and improvements I I
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
~ .
-3-
Feb. 13, 1990
that would be necessary to accommodate such traffic
movements. For proposed developments which would
generate three-thousand (3,000) vehicle trips per day
or more, or two-hundred fifty (250) or more
single-directional vehicle trips within a one (l) hour
period, a traffic impact analysis shall be required.
Said traffic impact analysis shall include projected
trip generation for the development, for all major
roadways and intersections within one and one-half
(1.5) miles of the subject parcel, as well as traffic
that would utilize local streets through residential
zoning districts. Said traffic impact analysis shall
compare traffic levels between the existing zoning and
the proposed zoning or development of the subject
parcel, and shall take into consideration all
development that would be possible under the current
zoning within the City, adjacent cities, and within the
unincorporated area of Palm Beach County within' a
radius of five (5) miles. For those parc~ls lying in
the unincorporated area of Palm Beach County, which are \
not currently zoned for urban land uses, the potential' ~
land uses according to the Palm Beach County
comprehensive plan shall be used. Where said parcels
are shown on the Palm Beach County comprehensive plan
under residential land use categories, the midpoint of
the density range shown on the County comprehensive
plan shall be used. Where a county-wide study of
traffic generation at build-out has been adopted or is
utilized by Palm Beach County, the levels of traffic
that are projected by said study shall in all cases be
used to project background traffic in the traffic
impact analysis submitted by the applicant. . The format
and standards used in the traffic impact analysis shall
be the same as those which are required by Palm Beach
County, with the exception of the requirements lis~ed
above. Such traffic impact analysis shall include
recommendations for the mitigation of traffic impacts,
consistent with the standards which have been adopted
by or are utilized by Palm Beach County.
(e) For parcels larger than one (l) acre, a comparison
of the water demand for development under the proposed
zoning or development with water demand under the
existing zoning. Water demand shall be estimated using
the standards adopted by the Palm Beach County Health
Department for estimating such demand, unless different
standards are justified by a registered engineer.
Commitment to the provision of improvements to the
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
-4-
Feb. 14, 1990
water system shall also be included, where existing
facilities would be inadequate to serve development
under the proposed zoning.
(f) For parcels larger than one (1) acre, a comparison
of sewage flows that would be generated under the
proposed zoning or development with that which would be
generated under the existing zoning. Sewage flows
shall be estimated using the standards adopted by the
Palm Beach County Health Department for estimating such
flows, unless different standards are justified by a
registered engineer. Commitment to the provision of
improvements to the sewage collection system shall also
be included, where the existing facilities would be
inadequate to serve development under the proposed
zoning.
. .
(g) For parcels larger than one (1) acre, a comparison
of sewage flows that would be generated under the ~
proposed zoning or development with that which would be
generated under the existing zoning. Sewage flows "\ \
shall be estimated using the standards adopted by the
Palm Beach County Health Department for estimating such
flows, unless different standards are justified by a
registered engineer. Commitment to the provision of
improvements to the sewage collection system shall also
be included, where the existing facilities would be
inadequate to serve development under the proposed
zoning.
(h) For proposed residential developments larger than
one (1) acre, a comparison of the projected population
under the proposed zoning or development with the
projected population under the existing zoning.
Population projections according to age groups for the
proposed development shall be required, where more tha~
fifty (50) dwellings, or 50 sleeping rooms in the case
of group housing, would be allowed under the proposed
zoning. Applications for rezoning to commercial or
industrial zoning districts which exceed one (1) acre
in area shall also provide projections for the number
of employees. I
I I
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
-5-
Feb. 14, 1990
III. Proposed Mall Corner Restaurant (1.34 acres) at the
southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and Winchester Park
Boulevard owned by Mall Corner, Inc. (applications for
annexation, land use element amendment and rezoning).
The following items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
(1) Since the proposed zoning category does not comply with
the text language for Planning Area 7.f of the Future
Land Use Element Documents, an application for a
Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment.
(2) A standard City of Boynton Beach application form for
the Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning application
(the reprOduction submitted is not acceptable).
(3) An additional copy of the property owners' list, tax
maps (photocopy acceptable) and affidavit.
(4) Signature of applicant (owner) on page 6 of the
Annexation Application.
(5) Pursuant to item h(l) on page 4 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, the potential square
footage which would be allowed under the proposed
zoning.
" ~
. \
\ "
'(6) Pursuant to item h(8) on page 6 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, projections for the
number of employees.
IV. Proposed Retail/Oil Lube (2.44 acres) at the northeast
corner of West Boynton Beach Boulevard and Winchester Park
Boulevard owned by Winchester, Winchester, Zeiher and
Schroeder, a Florida General PartnerShip (applications for
annexation, land use element amendment and rezoning).
The following items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
(1) Since a portion of the proposed zoning category does
not comply with the text language for Planning Area 7.f
of the Future Land Use Element Support Documents, an
application for a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment.
(2) An additional copy of the property owners' list, tax
maps (photocopy acceptable) and affidavit.
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
-6-
Feb. 13, 1990
(3) Correct "Proposed Zoning" on page 3 of Annexation
application, as a County land use category has been
indicated instead of the proposed City zoning category.
(4) Pursuant to item hell on page 4 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, the potential square
footage which would be allowed under the proposed
zoning.
(5) Pursuant to item h(8) on page 6 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, projections for the
number of employees.
v. Proposed Knuth Road Planned Commercial Development (13.871
acres) at the southwest corner of West Boynton Beach
Boulevard and Knuth Road owned by the Winchester Family
Partnership, Ltd. (applications for annexation, land use
element amendment ,and rezoning). J
The following items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
I ~
. ~
(1) The correct fee for rezoning to PCD is $1,000 pursuant
to the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Fee
Schedule (a check in the amount of $900 was submitted).
(2) Since a portion of the proposed land use and zoning
" categories does not comply with the text language for
Planning Area 7.j of the Future Land Use Element
Support Documents, an application for a Comprehensive
Plan Text Amendment.
(3) An additional copy of the property owners' list, tax
maps (photocopy acceptable) and affidavit.
(4) Signature of applicant is missing from page 6 of
Annexation Application (copy of owner's authorization
signed by Bill R. Winchester).
(5) A tree survey which conforms to the requirements of the
City oflBoynton Beach Tree Preservation Ordinance (see
section 7.5 - 6.l(b) of Article I of the Environmental
Regulations).
(6) Pursuant to item h(l) on page 4 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, the potential square
footage which would be allowed under the proposed
zoning (total for entire PCD).
, J
I
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
-7-
Feb. 13, 1990
(7) Pursuant to item h(8) of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, projections for the
number of employees.
(8) Pursuant to item h(11) on page 7 of the Land Use
Element Amendment/Rezoning application, conformance
with the requirements for Unified Control outlined in
Section 6.F.3 of Appendix A-Zoning and submittal of a
subdivision master plan pursuant to Article VIII,
Section 4 of Appendix C-Subdivisions, Platting.
VI. Proposed Boynton Beach Boulevard Planned Conmmercial
Oevelopment (14.76 acres) on the south side of West Boynton
Beach Boulevard owned by University of Florida Foundation,
Inc. (applications for annexation, land use element
amendment and rezoning).
The fOllowing items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
( 1)
( 2 )
, "
(3 )
( 4)
( 5 )
( 6 )
(7 )
The correct fee for rezoning to PCD is $l,OOO pursuant.
to the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Fee '
Schedule (a check in the amount of $900 was submitted).
, )
Since the proposed land use and zoning category does
not comply with the text language for Planning Area 7.k
of the Future Land Use Element Support Documents, an
application for a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment.
An additional copy of the property owners' list, tax
maps (photocopy acceptable) and affidavit.
\ \
A tree survey which conforms to the requirements of the
City of Boynton Beach Tree Preservation Ordinance (see
section 7.5 - 6.1 (b) of Article I of the Environmental
Regulations.
I I
Pursuant to item h(l) on page 4 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, the potential square
footage which would be allowed under the proposed
zoning (total for entire PCD).
Pursuant to item h(8) on page 6 of the Land Use Element
Amendmeht/Rezoning application, projections for the
number of employees.
Pursuant to item h(ll) on page 7 of the Land Use
Element Amendment/Rezoning application, conformance
with the requirements for Unified Control outlined in
. J
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
-8-
Feb. 13, 1990
Section 6.F.3 of Appendix A-Zoning and submittal of a
subdivision master plan pursuant to Article VIII,
Section 4 of Appendix C-Subdivisions, Platting.
(8) Signature of Owner/Trustee is missing from page 7 of
the Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning application.'
Pursuant to Chapter l63.3187 F.S., none of the applications
submitted meet the criteria for small scale development
activities as a result of the text amendments that are necessary
and the fact that an amendment cannot involve the same property
more than once a year or the same owner's property within 200
feet of property granted a change within a period of 12 months.
I
It appears likely that several of these applications, either
separately or when considered together, may constitute_a
Development of Regional Impact (DRI). Therefore, a description
of the petitions, a map showing same, and a tabulation of the
acreages will be forwarded to the City Commission. The
Commission will need to decide whether a binding letter should 'be
requested from DCA regarding DRI status.
If the City Commission approves the transmittal of these
applications to DCA, you will be required to submit to the
Planning Department, prior to transmittal, a description of the
availability of and demand on pUblic facilities pursuant to
9J-ll.006(1)(b)4 of the Florida Administrative Code.
, ~
. ,
If 'you have any questions concerning the above, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNT~N~~ACH
J--. !. ~''-
JAMES J. GOLDEN
Senior City Planner
JJG:frb
cc: City Manager
Central File
Kilday
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
~
,@
100 E, Boynton Beach Blvd.
p, 0, Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435.0310
(407) 734.8111
f
OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR
February 13, 1990
Kilday & Associates, Inc.
Attn: Kieran J. Kilday
1551 Forum Place, Bldg. lOOA
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Dear Mr. Kilday:
Please' be advised that the Planning Department has reviewed the
six applications submitted on January 31, 1990. Our comments are
as follows:
, ~
, ~
I. Proposed Service Station (.80 acres) at southwest corner of
North Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road owned by Bill
Ray Winchester and Elsie A. Winchester (applications for
annexation, land use element amendment and rezoning).
The following items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
(l) since the proposed zoning category does not comply wit~
the text language for Planning Area 7 of the Future
Land Use Element Support Documents, an application for
a Compr~hensive Plan Text Amendment.
(2) An additional copy of the property owners' list, tax
maps (photocopy acceptable) and affidavit.
(3) The water/sewer impact statement required pursuant to
items 6 and 7 on pages 4 and 5 is based on comparison
of existing and proposed zoning categories and not '
existing and proposed land use categories. The
statement also does not indicate that calculations are
based on the standards adopted by the Palm Beach
County Health Department.
--- ..- -~.__.._._._---'__..______~u._,_.__.__
. TO: Kilday & Assoc
-2-
Feb. 13, 1990
II. Proposed Mall South Parcels (49.52 acres total) located on
the east and west sides of Winchester Park Boulevard
between Old Boynton Road and Boynton Beach Boulevard, owned
by Bill R. Winchester, Elsie A. Winchester, and Ernest
Klatt (applications for annexation, land use element
amendment and rezoning).
The following items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
(1) Since the proposed zoning category does not comply with
the text language for Planning Area 7.f of the Future
Land Use Element Support Documents, an application for
a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment.
( 2) An additional copy of the property owners' list, tax
maps (photocopy acceptable) and affidavit.
(3) Pursuant to item c(l) on page 3 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, written consent to the
processing of this application from Ernest Klatt.
. .~ ~
(4) Pursuant to item d(3) on page 4 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, a tree survey which
meets the requirements of the City of Boynton Beach
Tree Preservation Ordinance.
(5) Pursuant to item h on pages 4, 5, 6 and 7 of the Land
Use Element Amendment/Rezoning application, a compari-
son of the impacts that would be created by develop-
ment under the proposed zoning with the impacts that
would be created by development under the existing
zoning, which shall include:
(a) A comparison of the potential square footage or
number land type of dwelling units under the existing
zoning with that which would be allowed under t.h~
proposed zoning or development.
(b) A statement of the uses that would be allowed in
the proposed zoning or development, and any particular
uses that would be excluded.
(c) Proposed timing and phasing of the development.
(d) A comparison of traffic which would be generated
under the proposed zoning or development, with' the
traffic that would be generated under the current
zoning; also, an analysis of traffic movements at the
intersections of driveways that would serve the
property and surrounding roadways, and improvements I I
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
-3-
Feb. 13, 19 90
that would be necessary to acconunodate such traffic
movements. For proposed developments which would
generate three-thousand (3,000) vehicle trips per day
or more, or two-hundred fifty (250) or more
single-directional vehicle trips within a one (1) hour
period, a traffic impact analysis shall be required.
Said traffic impact analysis shall include projected
trip generation for the development, for all major
roadways and intersections within one and one-half
(1.5) miles of the subject parcel, as well as traffic
that would utilize local streets through residential
zoning districts. Said traffic impact analysis shall
compare traffic levels between the existing zoning and
the proposed zoning or development of the subject
parcel, and shall take into consideration all
development that would be possible under the current
zoning w~thin the City, adjacent cities, and within the
unincorporated area of Palm Beach County within' a
radius of five (5) miles. For those parcels lying in
the unincorporated area of Palm Beach County, which are \
not currently zoned for urban land uses, the potential' ,
land uses according to the Palm Beach County
comprehensive plan shall be used. Where said parcels
are shown on the Palm Beach County comprehensive plan
under residential land use categories, the midpoint of
the density range shown on the County comprehensive
plan shall be used. Where a county-wide study of
traffic generation at build-out has been adopted or is
utilized by Palm Beach County, the levels of traffic
that are projected by said study shall in all cases be
used to project background traffic in the traffic
impact analysis submitted by the applicant. The format
and standards used in the traffic impact analysis shall
be the same as those which are required by Palm Beach
County, with the exception of the requirements lis~ed
above. Such traffic impact analysis shall include
reconunendations for the mitigation of traffic impacts,
consistent with the standards which have been adopted
by or are utilized by Palm Beach County.
(e) For parcels larger than one (1) acre, a comparison
of the water demand for development under the proposed
zoning or development with water demand under the
existing zoning. Water demand shall be estimated using
the standards adopted by the Palm Beach County Health
Department for estimating such demand, unless different
standards are justified by a registered engineer.
Conunitment to the provision of improvements to the
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
-4-
Feb. 14, 1990
water sy~tem shall also be included, where existing
facilities would be inadequate to serve development
under the proposed zoning.
(f) For parcels larger than one (I) acre, a comparison
,
of sewage flows that would be generated under the
proposed zoning or development with that which would be
generated under the existing zoning. Sewage flows
shall be estimated using the standards adopted by the
Palm Beach County Health Department for estimating such
flows, unless different standards are justified by a
registered engineer. Commitment to the provision of
improvements to the sewage collection system shall also
be included, where the existing facilities would be
inadequate to serve development under the proposed
zoning.
(g) For parcels larger than one (1) acre, a comparison
of sewage flows that would be generated under the ..
proposed zoning or development with that which would be
generated under the existing zoning. Sewage flows' \ \
shall be estimated using the standards adopted by the
Palm Beach County Health Department for estimating such
flows, unless different standards are justified by a
registered engineer. Commitment to the provision of
improvements to the sewage collection system shall also
be included, where the existing facilities would be
inadequate to serve development under the proposed
zoning.
(h) For proposed residential developments larger than
one (1) acre, a comparison of the projected population
under the proposed zoning or development with the
projected population under the existing zoning.
population projections according to age groups for the
proposed development shall be required, where more tha~.
fifty (50) dwellings, or 50 sleeping rooms in the case
of group housing, would be allowed under the proposed
zoning. Applications for rezoning to commercial or
industrial zoning districts which exceed one (1) acre
in area shall also provide projections for the number
of employees.
j I
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
-5-
Feb. 14, 1990
III. Proposed Mall Corner Restaurant (1.34 acres) at the
southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and Winchester Park
Boulevard owned by Mall Corner, Inc. (applications for
annexation, land use element amendment and rezoning).
The following items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
(1) Since the proposed zoning category does not comply with
the text language for Planning Area 7.f of the Future
Land Use Element Documents, an application for a
Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment.
(2) A standard City of Boynton Beach application form for
the Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning application
(the reproduction submitted is not acceptable).
(3) An additional copy of the property owners' list, tax
maps (photocopy acceptable) and affidavit.
(4) Signature of applicant (owner) on page 6 of the
Annexation Application.
t \
, \
(5) Pursuant to item hell on page 4 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, the potential square
footage which would be allowed under the proposed
zoning.
(6) Pursuant to item h(8) on page 6 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, projections for the
number of employees.
IV. Proposed Retail/Oil Lube (2.44 acres) at the northeast
corner of West Boynton Beach Boulevard and Winchester Park
Boulevard owned by Winchester, Winchester, Zeiher and
Schroeder, a Florida General Partnership (applications for.
annexation, land use element amendment and rezoning).
The following items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
(1) Since a portion of the proposed zoning category does
not comply with the text language for Planning Area 7.f
of the Future Land Use Element support Documents, an
application for a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment.
(2) An additional copy of the property owners' list, tax
maps (photocopy acceptable) and affidavit.
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
-6-
Feb. 13, 1990
(3) Correct "Proposed Zoning" on page 3 of Annexation
application, as a County land use category has been
indicated instead of the proposed City zoning category.
(4) Pursuant to item hell on page 4 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, the potential square
footage which would be allowed under the proposed
zoning.
(5) Pursuant to item h(a) on page 6 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, projections for the
number of employees.
v. Proposed Knuth Road Planned Commercial Development (l3.871
acres) at the southwest corner of West Boynton Beach
Boulevard and Knuth Road owned by the Winchester Family
Partnership, Ltd. (applications for annexation, land use
element amendment and rezoning).
The following items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
. \
. ~
(1) The correct fee for rezoning to PCD is $1,000 pursuant
to the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Fee
Schedule (a check in the amount of $900 was submitted).
(2) Since a portion of the proposed land use and zoning
categories does not comply with the text language for
Planning Area 7.j of the Future Land Use Element
Support Documents, an application for a Comprehensive
Plan Text Amendment.
(3) An additional copy of the property owners' list, tax
maps (photocopy acceptable) and affidavit.
(4) Signature of applicant is missing from page 6 of .
Annexation Application (copy of owner's authorization
signed by Bill R. Winchester).
(5) A tree survey which conforms to the requirements of the
City of Boynton Beach Tree Preservation Ordinance (see
section 7.5 - 6.I(b) of Article I of the Environmental
Regulations).
(6) Pursuant to item hell on page 4 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, the potential square
footage which would be allowed under the proposed
zoning (total for entire PCD).
I
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
-7-
Feb. 13, 1990
(7) Pursuant to item h(8) of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, projections for the
number of employees.
(a) Pursuant to item h(ll) on page 7 of the Land Use
Element Amendment/Rezoning application, conformance
with the requirements for Unified Control outlined in
Section 6.F.3 of Appendix A-Zoning and submittal of a
subdivision master plan pursuant to Article VIII,
Section 4 of Appendix C-Subdivisions, Platting.
VI. Proposed Boynton Beach Boulevard Planned Conmmercial
Development (l4.76 acres) on the south side of West Boynton
Beach Boulevard owned by University of Florida Foundation,
Inc. (applications for annexation, land use element
amendment and rezoning).
The following items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
( 1 )
The correct fee for rezoning to PCD is $1,000 pursuant.
to the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Fee
Schedule (a check in the amount of $900 was submitted).
\ \
(2) Since the proposed land use and zoning category does
not comply with the text language for Planning Area 7.k
of the Future Land Use Element Support Documents, an
application for a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment.
(3) An addi~ional copy of the property owners' list, tax
maps (photocopy acceptable) and affidavit.
(4) A tree survey which conforms to the requirements of the
City of Boynton Beach Tree Preservation Ordinance (see
section 7.5 - 6.l (b) of Article I of the Environmental
Regulations.
(5) Pursuant to item h(l) on page 4 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, the potential square
footage which would be allowed under the proposed
zoning (total for entire PCD).
(6) Pursuant to item h(a) on page 6 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, projections for the
number of employees.
(7) Pursuant to item h(ll) on page 7 of the Land Use
Element Amendment/Rezoning application, conformance
with the requirements for Unified Control outlined in
i
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
-8-
Feb. 13, 1990
Section 6.F.3 of Appendix A-Zoning and submittal of a
subdivision master plan pursuant to Article VIII,
Section 4 of Appendix C-Subdivisions, Platting.
(a) Signature of Owner/Trustee is missing from page 7 of
the Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning application.'
Pursuant to Chapter l63.31a7 F.S., none of the applications
submitted meet the criteria for small scale development
activities as a result of the text amendments that are necessary
and the fact that an amendment cannot involve the same property
more than once a year or the same owner's property within 200
feet of property granted a change within a period of 12 months.
It appears likely that several of these applications, either
separately or when considered together, may constitute a
Development of Regional Impact (DRI). Therefore, a description
of the petitions, a map showing same, and a tabulation of the
acreages will be forwarded to the City commission. The
Commission will need to decide whether a binding letter should 'be
requested from DCA regarding DRI status.
I
If the City Commission approves the transmittal of these
applications to DCA, you will be required to submit to the
Planning Department, prior to transmittal, a description of the
availability of and demand on public facilities pursuant to
9J-ll.006(1)(b)4 of the Florida Administrative Code.
" \
, ~
If you have any questions concerning the above, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNT~N~~ACH
~.f~~
JAMES J. GOLDEN
Senior City Planner
I;.
JJG:frb
cc: City Manager
Central File
bee: Alan ~hfil~, PBCty Tra~fie Dept
Kilday
, I
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
MALL CORNER
-
.
OLD BOYNTON ROAD &
WINCHESTER PARK BOULEVARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 30, 1990
Prepared By:
K.S. ROGERS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC.
1495 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite F
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
(407) 964-7300
I~/t~
3()
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1 LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 2 EXISTING ROADWAY
CONDITIONS
FIGURE 3 DISTRIBUTED TRAFFIC
FIGURE 4 TOTAL TRAFFIC
FIGURE 5 PEAK HOUR
VOLUMES
APPENDIX
APPENDIX A
CAPACITY AT LEVEL
OF SERVICE "D"
THRESHOLD VOLUMES
APPENDIX B
THRESHOLD VOLUMES
FOR SIGNIFICANT
IMPACT
APPENDIX C
HISTORICAL GROWTH
APPENDIX D
MAJOR PROJECT LIST
APPENDIX E
CAPACITY ANALYSIS
J t-!l'.EOPU CT_I ON
This office has been retained to prepare a Traffic Impact
Anal ysis to address the traffic impact from a proposed 7,000
square foot family style restaurant which is to be located on the
southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and Winchester Park Boule-
vard (Mall Road) in Section 19, Township 45 South, Range 43 East,
in the unincorporated area of Palm Beach County, Florida. It is
proposed to rezone and annex this parcel into the City of Boynton
Beach.
This Analysis has further been performed in order to deter-
mine the volume of traffic expected to be added to the roadway
system as a resul t of the approval of this project, the effect
that this traffic will have on the capacity of the roadways in
the area of the project and what roadway improvements, if any,
are necessary as a result of the approval of this project. This
Anal ysis has al so been performed in accordance with both the
standards and criteria as established in the Zoning Code of the
City of Boynton Beach and the technical requirements of the Palm
Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance #87-18.
Existing traffic counts, which were available from the
Metropolitan Planning Organization and the Palm Beach County
Traffic Division were used when applicable and th8se counts were
augmented by twenty-four (24) hour machine counts and peak hour
hand counts performed for this office.
SITE INFORMATION
As stated, this 1.3 acre L-shaped parcel is located at the
southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and Winchester Park Boule-
vard. According to the site plan, as prepared by Kilday & Associ-
ates, a 7,000 square foot family style restaurant is planned for
this site. The site plan also shows that 105 parking spaces are
proposed to be constructed for this use. Also shown on the site
plan are two points of acceSSj one each on Old Boynton Road and
Winchester Park Boulevard.
Rlll""ll lIIP"0(HU."UI{,!> Hl"a,
71.
S6-/
3^'r/
w
>
<(
o
Z
N
N
~
Z
11'r/tH
k, s, rogers, consulting
engineer, inc.
west palm beach, fl
~
W
I-
m
-~------------------~--_.._-~._~-----~..._--------------'-'-~-"~---'-,------
~.
>
-l
to
o
<(
o
IX:
:r.
<.)
<(
w
IX)
O~
11'r/V'l
OCl HlnN>I
z
o
.....
z
>-
o
IX)
o
-l
o
z
o
.....
z
>-
o
IX)
w
>
<(
w
>
<(
.J:
.....
I.{)
o
IX:
(')
N
~
C/)
w
(/')
SS3~DNO~
A~\f lJ11V'l
LOCATION MAP
dote
JAN 90
figure
1
The sitE: is located ifi l:~ldLloll to the major roadways in
Figure 1.
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS
The major roads serving as access to this site are Old
Boynton Road and Winchester Park Boulevard (Mall Road). For the
purposes of this Report, Winchester Park Boulevard (Mall Road) is
not considered a major roadway. Winchester Park Boulevard is a
four (4) lane divided roadway of limited length between Boynton
Beach Bou 1 evard and 01 d Boynton Road and pr imar i I y serves as
access to the Boynton Mall and as access to the property fronting
the road.
Old Boynton Road is an east - west collector roadway. In
the immediate area of the project, east of Knuth Road, Old Boyn-
ton Road is a five (5) lane roadway. West of Knuth Road, Old
Boynton Road is a two (2) lane road. This section of Old Boynton
Road, from Knuth Road to Military Trail, is scheduled to be
widened to a five (5) lane roadway by Palm Beach County in fiscal
year 1991-92.
The existing roadway average annual daily volumes and the
existing roadway capacity in the project study area are shown in
Figure 2.
GENERATION
The generation rate used for this residential project was
obtained from "Trip Generation - Fourth Edition", Institute of
Transportation Engineers, 1987.
-2-
11
~~
o
>
..J
CO
UJ
>
<l:
UJ
>
<l:
<; 6-/
J:
I-
LO
0
<:
0
II:
coo COIO 00
00 J:
coo 00 ","0
010 coo 0 ...'<t
(\1M 010 <l: IOIP ~
(\1M UJ (\I'<t
CO en
3^V MIO LOIO
coO MO
MO IP'<t
UJ ...0 Ol::l "'"IP
> ...M (\I'<t
<: 11'VV>l
w I-
.... ;: Ol::l HlnN>l LOIO
MO
en 0 IP'<t
CO Mr ","IP
coo (\I'<t
M'"
"'M
... ....
o
((
M
(\I
w
en
SS3l::18NO::>
o
Z
(\I
(\I
Z
o
I-
Z
>-
o
co
Jd::lV llll\f'l
UJ
:E
0::::>
-...I
~O
<l:>
:: o.
..JO
00.
o ZIcn
Z i=cnO
w cnW..J
C) X~I-
W WI-<:
..J
~
Z
o
...I
o
11 'tI l::Il
MIO
coo
M...
"'M
... ...
engineer, ,nc
west oalrn beach fl
EXISTING ROAD CONDITIONS
dote
JAN 90
figure
2
k 5 'ogers, consulting
~-------.-
The generation rate used in this Analysis has been deter-
mined to be 201 trips per day per 1,000 square feet of building
floor area. Thus, this 7,000 square foot restaurant is expected
to gen.e,rate an average of 1,406 trips pel' day at such time that
this project is completely builtout and occupied.
Article IV, Section 2 B (7) of Ordinance #87-18 recognizes
that not all traffic generated by certain commercial land uses is
odell t iona 1 traff ic on the adjacent roadway network. The Ordi-
nance does allow for the consideration of pass-by or captured
traffic. Restaurants are one of the land uses for which pass-by
traffic can De considered. According to the Ordinance, the
amount of captured (pass-by) traffic for restaurant uses is
fifteen percent (15%). Thus, the additional traffic expected to
be generated by this project at full buildout and occupancy is
recalculated to be:
1,406 tpd x 0.85 = 1,195 tpd
:r_RA,_fFlc:;_j;)ISTRIBUTLO_~_~D ASSIGNMENT
The traffic distribution used in the preparation of this
Analysis was prepared according to an examination of land use
pc:tterns and travel patterLs in the project study area. Based
llpon the proceeding, the traffic distribution for this t:,roject
was determined and is
shown below:
NORTH 24%
EAST 29%
SOUTH 21%
WEST 26%
The distributed traffic volumes for this project are shown
in Figure 3. In accordance with the Traffic Performance Stand-
ards Ordinance, the distributed traffic was brought two miles
from the site, or until the project generated less then 1% of the
capacity of the roadway (Insignificant Volume).
-3-
Zl ... "
o.
:.-
...J
en
w
>
<(
S6-1
*
U)IO
"-0
N(,)
:I:
......
U)
0
<(
0
a:
* ::t: *
~IO *10
CDO () (')I~
..-(') NO <( OCD ~
~(') W N~
en (/)
3^V' *
~IO Q)I~
0)0 U)CD
w (')(') (')'Oit
> al::l
<( r.,=,;.' llVVII *
'1:.::~ ~1'Oit
c;;;~
C\/CD
W C\/'Oit
I- al::l H.lnN>l
CIJ
(')1"-
'Oit(')
.- .-
lIl'I.".tl A'..IlClO.......'( S "1.1.,'
o
Z
N
N
~
Z
k. s, rogers, consulting
engineer, inc.
west palm beach, fl.
w
>
<(
*
0'''-
CD~
z
o
......
z
>-
o
en
*1"-
~~
*1'-
0(')
CD..-
o
...J
o
11\f~H
z
o
....
z
>-
o
en
DISTRIBUTED TRAFFIC
o
a:
(')
N
w
(/)
SS31::1DNO~
....
<( ......
w.... ()
()~() <(
a.
-::><( ~
u....Ja.
u.O~ ....
<(>-
a: 0""" Z
.......Jz <(
......0<( ()
o () :I: () u.
ZW(/}U:: Z
w"'w- C.!'
(!)oa:Z
wa::I:~ (/)
-' a....... (/) z
~/o
0)0 *
(')(')
A !:I V' I111V11
dote
JAN 90
figure
3
EIXE:G1:' _ em I2fiPl\G..I'rY
The Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordi-
nance delineates very specific criteria which must be met prior
/
to any' Rezoning or Special Exception Request being approved.
Petitions are classified as being either a "Significant Project"
or "Insignificant Project" according to the project impact on
roadway links and the capacity of the impacted roadway links.
A "Significant Project" is defined by Ordinance #87-18 as a
project which generates more than one percent (1%) of the thresh-
old volume at Level of Service "D" on any link with the project's
radius of development influence, The threshold volumes for
"Significant Projects" are shown in APPENDIX B. For a t\.,ro lane
road, the threshold volume for a significant impact is 131 trips
per day, 300 trips per day for a four lane divided roadway and/or
five lane undivided roadway, and 464 trips per day for a six lane
divided roadway.
Reviewing the project volumes in Figure 3 with the threshold
vol urnes in APPENDIX B , it is seen that this project creates a
significant impact on the following roadway links:
TABLE 1
SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
OLD BOYNTON ROAD
OLD BOYNTON ROAD
OLD BOYNTON ROAD
Congress Avenue - Boynt. Beach Blvd.
Winchester Park Blvd. - Congress Ave.
Lawrence Road - Knuth Road
It is concluded that this project is classified as a "Sig-
nificant Project" according to Ordinance #87-18. For any Signifi-
cant Project, the total traffic must be determined for all road-
way links upon which the project creates a significant impact
(See TABLE 1).
-4-
The total traffic is defined as the sum of the Existing
a'/F.,rage. annual, daily traffic, the project traffic, plus the
background traffic for the buildout year of the project. The
bu i 1 do-t',t year has been est ab I i shed as 1991 by the deve loper's
representative. The background traffic is further defined as the
sum of the hist,:nical growth, plus traffic generated by Major
Projects, which are in excess of 10% of the capacity of the
affected roadway link. The total traffic volumes for the year
1991 are shown in Figure 4.
The 1991 projected traffic has been determined by taking the
sum of the 1989 AADT, plus the projected historical growth, plus
the traffic generated for Major Projects which are in excess of
10% of the roadway's link capacity. The historical growth calcu-
lations are shown in APPENDIX C. The major project traffic
volume calculations are shown in APPENDIX D.
A review of the available information revealed that there
were no major projects identified which would generate more than
10% of the capacity of a road link upon which this proposed
project would create a significant impact within the buildout
period.
The total traffic volumes for the buildout year of 1991 are
shm.Jn wi th the roadway capacities in Figure 4. Reviewing the
total vCIlumes and the roadway capacities in Figure 4, it is seen
that on the roadway links which this project creates a signifi-
cCint impact, the total traff ic exceeds capacity on one 1 ink of
road; Old Boynton Road between Lawrence Road and Knuth Road. As
previously mentioned, this roadway link is in the County's Five
Year Road Program to be widened to a 5 lane roadway during fiscal
year 1991-92. This widening will provide adequate capacity for
the additional traffic expected to be generated by this site.
-5-
_fl'A.'Il( Itr",,~,(,."NfI(:~ I!;II.,)
II
,
.....
a
>
...J
al
W
>
<(
W
>
<(
1
S6-1
CXl"'N~
""'C')CJ:)
""'..."'"
0> C')
....
a
<(
o
a:
J:
l-
ll)
a
a:
C')
C\I
J:
0
<( ;: W
W
lD en en
3^V SS31::1DNO:::>
C') "",0 .....
coo>"'" ....
W C') C') C') .... al::l
> ... C\I"'"
< llV~
al::l H.lnN>I
C') C') O!CJ:)
CXl"",""'CJ:)
C')....C')co
.... (\IC')
.... ....
a z
z 0
(\J I- 0
C\I Z
>- LL
0 LL
lD ou<(
--a:
LLLLI-O
LLLL _
<<aLL
a:a:zLL
I-I-::l<(
a 0 C)I-oa:
...J zua:1-
3: 0 Z -wC)...J
Z W I-"")~<
llV l::l.l Al::lV .llll~ '-' ~OOI-
z w xa:<O
0 -l WCl.lDl-
I-
Z
>- C') "'" 01.....
0 coo>""'...
lD C')C')C')...
... N"'"
... ....
k, 5, rogers, consulting
engineer, inc.
west palm beach, fl,
TOT AL TRAFFIC
date
JAN 90
figure
4
P EAJ(___ B ()U R
The expected peak hour volumes generated by this project
~ere calculated in order to determine what site related improve-
ments,' . if any, wi 11 be required. The peak hour vol urnes were
determined based upon inf0rmation also obtained from "Trip Gener-
ation". The peak hour generation volumes used for this project
have been calculated as a percentage of the average daily traffic
and are shewn as:
P.M. PEAK HOUR - 0.099 (1195)
rOTAL
118
IN
63
OUT
55
These project peak hour volumes distributed at the project's
two driveways and at the intersection of Old Boynton Road and
Winchester Park Boulevard are shown in Figure 5. Also shown in
Figure 5 are the volumes projected through 1991. A review and an
analysis of the volumes shown in Figure 5 were performed based
upon the procedures in "Interim Materials on Highway Capacity",
Transportation Research Circular Number 212, January 1980. From
these analyses, shown in APPENDIX E, it is concluded that no
additional roadway improvements are necessary as a result of this
project's approval.
CONCLUSIOB
This proposed 7.000 square foot family style restaurant is
expected to generate an average of 1,195 additional trips per day
on the area's roadway system at complete occupancy and buildout.
This project is classified as being a "Significant Project". One
roadway link on which this project created a significant impact
was found to have a total volume in excess of capacity. However,
with the scheduled widening of this roadway link by Palm Beach
County in fiscal year 1991-92, adequate capacity will be provid-
ed. Thus, it is recommended that this proj ect be approved as
submitted.
-6-
Alllil"ll ql"lil~lhR"""'I('" I' ..,.'
,
o
e:(
o
a:
.....
....LO....
CD""''''
ell~N"
'" ",,,, '- (9C)O
0...0
...... - (99)0
) I\.,- (9v~)OC
(C6)0 ~ ~I (
H ~ ~)O - I \
(~C)O- \C;;~U)
NIOCD
"'C'?'"
I C'? ~ LO
"O^18
)4l:1"fd
z
o
.....
z
>-
o
al
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
L_____~
n~H~-.. (
....
...
N
......
...
N
I
\
........)
LOC'?
"'oq- I
CD......
.....C'?
o oq- 1"- (9~)9~
j \. ,.- (9)9
II (
I~....
LN ell
oq-'"
",ell
o
W
I-
en
----,
I
I
I
o
..J
o
l1.
,
'"
lio...
~
k, s, rogers, consulting
engineer, inc.
west palm beach, fl
PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
1:I31S3H~NIM
U
u.
U.u
e:(_
a:u.
.....u..
Uoe:(
U:wex::
u. ..........
e:( u.....
cO:WU
z..... -,w
0-'
w..... 0:0
<!' U a. 0:
W W a.
-'...
...JOell
ex:: ell +
a....
....
<0:;;
"'C'?
.....
dote
JAN 90
figure
5
APPENDIX
APPENDIX A
THRESHOLD VOLUMES
LEVEL OF SERVICE "0"
(AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC)
ROADWAY TPD
Two Lane 13,100
Four Lane Undivided 27,800
Four Lane Divided 30,000
Five Lane Undivided 30,000
Six Lane Divided 46,400
Eight Lane Divided 60,000
Six Lane Freeway 95,000
APPENDIX B
THRESHOLD VOLUMES FOR
SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
MINIMUM VOLUME
THOROUGHFARE TYPE (TRIPS PER DAYl
Two Lane 131
Four Lane (Divided) 300
Five Lane (Undivided) 300
Six Lane (Divided) 464
Eight Lane (Divided) 600
Six Lane (Expressway) 950
APPENDIX C
HISTORIC GROWTH CALCULATIONS
MALL CORNER
I~OAD / J,INK
HISTORIC
GROWTH
RATE
OLD BOYNTON ROAD:
Congress - Boyn.Bch. Blvd.
Winch.Prk.B1vd. - Congress
Lawrence - Knuth
1.169
1 .098
1.098
1989
MDT
9,448
11,383
11,383
1990
bAllT
11,179
12,498
12,498
1991
MDT
12,910
13,723
13,723
APPENDIX D
MAJOR PROJECT TRAFFIC
MALL CORNER
A. The following Major Projects have been identified as having
an impact in the project study area:
BOYNTON BEACH MALL
MOTOROLA
QUANTUM PARK
MELEAR PUD
COUNTRY CLUB TRAIL
PALM ISLES PUD
SUN VALLEY PUD
B. None of the above Major Projects were identified as creating
more than 10% of the capacity on the roadways upon which the Mall
Corner project created a significant impact within the buildlout
period of this project.
APPENDIX E
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH CENTER
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
OLD BOYNTON RD & MALL RD
**********************************
DATE 1991 PM
LEVEL OF SERVICE A
SATURATION 25
CRITICAL N/S VOL 102
CRITICAL E/W VOL 346
CRITICAL SUM 448
*************************************
LANE
NORTHBOUND
MOV WIDTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
R. .
12.0
12.0
12.0
T. .
L..
NORTHBOUND
LEFT
THRU
RIGHT
146
88
38
TRUCKS (%)
5
5
5
5
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
PHASING N/S
E/W
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
LANE GEOMETRY
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0
T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0
- 12.0 L'. . 12.0 L. . 12.0
u..
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
93
111
32
LOCAL BUSES (#/HR)
o
o
o
o
29
351
65
21
475
96
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
.9
.9
.9
.9
:1. NEITHER
:1. NEITHER
: 1.
90 SECONDS
TURN PROTECTED
TURN PROTECTED
o - 99 (#PEDS/HR)
CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
THRU -RIGHT 102 86 252 346
LEFT 0 0 0 0
LEFT TURN CHECK
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
INPUT VOLUME 146 93 29 21
ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 0
CAPACITY 16 0 0 94
MOVEMENT OK OK OK OK
llNSIONALlZEIl INTERSECTIONS
WORKSHEET FOR ANALYSIS OF T-INTERSECTIONS
LOCATION: OL.D /SDVN7Z'N ;lib JS/'77!i l:M2
HOURLY VOLUMES
Major Street: Oe~ i?nvN7()N 121"::J CD N
N=r7l .... Vs~
Grade' . ~ V2 __ r-- V. '1'3
_% !L V) ~ f r; N=0
It V, V,
~ h OSlOP
o YIELD
N =[i)
Minor
Street:
:S/Tl: i::Jl:C
Date of Counts:
Tune Period:
Average Running Speed:_
PHF:
Grade
VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS
Movement No.
Volume (vph)
Vol. (pcph), see Table 10-1
STEP 1: RT from Minor Street
t
%
2
NAME: /nIt! HAS/ :];)~t.l2"Z1{J
VOLUMES IN PCPH
10-31
__ V s .i:i2.... _
__ ~ V. .:t.::L- _
~,~
llz
nzV2
-!l V3
3
4
5
7
9
Conflicting Flow, V c
Critical Gap, T" and Potential Capacity, cp
Actual Capacity, cm
STEP 2: LT From Major Street
Conflicting Flow, V,
Critical Gap, T~ and Potential Capacity, cp
Percent of cp Utilized and Impedance Factor (Fig. 10-5)
Actual Capacity, Cm
STEP 3: LT From Minor Street
,-V.
:.26
1/2 V:I + V 2 - ~ + :t.i:2... - ..!t2:1. vph (V ~)
T, - ~ see (Table 10-2) cp9 - ~ pcph (Fig. 10-3)
c"'. - cp9 - ~ pcph
( V.
V3+V2-~+ '142 -!i:JL.vph(V,.)
T, -::i:...!L see (Table 1O~2)'cp4 --'760 pcph (Fig. 10-3)
(v./cp4) X 100 -= ~ p. -= eJ,tf..,
cm. -= Cpt = ~ pcph
~V,
Conflicting Flow, V c
Critical Gap, T" and Potential Capacity, cp
Actual Capacity, cm
SHARED-LANE CAPACITY
1/2 V3+V2+VS+V. -= ~ +#~:2+ ~ +:i::L = ~h (Ve,)
T, = ~ see (Table 10-2) cp' = ~ pcph (Fig. 10-3)
cm' -= cp' X p. -= 2-10 x.2.1::L -= 2ZZ. pcph . ,
Movement No.
1
9
4
..
SH = v, + v, if lane is sha~
. (v~/cm') + (v,/cm,)
C (
?~O
C
LOS
C.
.4
,"
?age 3
II.
SITE DATA
The following information must be filled out below and ~ust
appear, where applicable, on all six (6) copies of the site plan.'
1. Land Use Category shown in
the Comprehensive Plan ~nmmprri~' - T~~~' R~t~il
2. Zoninq District C-3
3.
Area of Site 1.34 acres
acres
58,255.94 sq. ft.
4. Land Use -- Acreaqe Breakdown
a. Residential, including ------- acres
surrounding lot area or
grounds
% of site
b. Recreation Areas * ------- acres
(excluding water area)
--------% of site
c. Water Area ------- acres --------% of site
d. Commercial 1.34 acres 100 % of site
e. Industrial ________acres ------- % of site
f. Public/Institutional ---------acres ------ % of site
t
g. Public, private and
Canal rights-of-way ------- acres --------% of site
h. other (specify) acres % of site
i. Other (specify) acres
% of site
j. Total area of site
1.34 acres
100
% of site
* Including open space suitable for outdoor recreation,
and having a minimum dimension of 50 ft,. by 50 ft.
5. Surface Cover
a. Ground floor building 7.000 sq.ft.
area ("building footprint")
12%
% of site.
b.
Water area
sq.ft.
% of site
c. Other impervious areas,
including paved area of
public & private streets,
paved area of parking
lots & driveways (ex-
cluding landscaped areas),
and sidewalks, patios,
decks, and athletic
courts. 38.657 sq.ft.
66.3
% of site.
d. Total impervious area 45.657 sq.ft.
78.3
% of site
e. Landscaped area 2,068 sq.ft.
inside of parking lots
(20 sq. ft. per interior
parking space required-
see Sec. 7.5-35(g) of
'. Landscape Code).
Planning Dept. 1/89
% of site'
~. ~~
".
f. other landscaped areas,
excluding water area
Page 4
% of site
10,530 sq. ft.
18
g. Other pervious areas,
including golf courses,
natural areap, yards, and
swales, but excluding
water areas -------- sq. ft. --------~ of site
h. Total pervious areas
i. Total area of site
6. Floor Area
a. Residential
b. Commercial/Office
c. Industrial/Warehouse
d. Recreational
e. Public/Institutional
f. Other (specify)
12, 598 sq. ft.
21.7 % of site
58,255.94sq. ft.
100
% of site
sq. ft.
7,000 sq. ft.
sq. 'ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
g. Other (specify)
sq. ft.
.. h. Total floor area 7.000 sq. ft.
7. Number of Residential Dwelling Uni.ts
a. Single-family detached dwelling units
b. Duplex dwelling units
c. Multi-Family (3 +
attached dwelling units)
." (1) Efficiency dwelling units
( 2) 1 Bedroom dwelling units
( 3 ) 2 Bedroom dwelling units
( 4 ) 3+ Bedroom d,welling units
d. Total mUlti-family dwelling units
e. Total number of dwelling units
8'"
Gross Density
dwelling units per acre
9.
Maximum height of structures on site
feet
1
stories
10. Required off-street parking
-a. Calculation of required
number of off-street
parking spaces
b. Off-street parking spaces.
provided on site plan
Restaurant=70sp
@ lspj100sf
provided=76
Planning'Dept. 1/89