LEGAL APPROVAL
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
~
@
120 N.E. 2nd AVENUE
P.O. BOX 310
BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA 33435-0310
(305) 734-6111
OFFICE.OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR
22 August 1984
Mr. Leo Noble
1123 Crestwood Boulevard
Lake Worth, FL 33431
Dear Mr. Noble:
Please be advised that on Tuesday, August 21, 1984 the
City Council approved your site plan request to construct
Pylon Interstate Park, subject to comments from.the following
Departments: Building, Engineering, utilities, Public Works,
Planning and the Energy Coordinator.
Prior to submitting your request for permits to the Building
Official all recommendations must be incorporated in your plans.
Additionally, all capital facilities fees and road impact fees
if applicable, are payable at the time of permit.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Yours very truly,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
~d'~~c:
Carmen S. Annunziato
Planning Director
jbks
cc:
City Manager
Technical Review Board
Central File
t
(
MINUTES - BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 9, 1984
Interior Designer in Delray Beach but presently lives with
her family in West Palm Beach, near Wellington, which is
about a 45 minute drive. Miss Bottosto wants to build a
small home for herself.
Miss Bottosto informed Mr. Ampol that she is single and will
move into the home herself. She confirmed Mr. Mearns' state-
ment that she purchased the lot in November, 1983. In the
Building Department's plats, Mr. Slavin questioned if this
- lot has always been a 50 foot lot or a part of another lot.
Mr. Keehr replied that it has always been a 50 foot lot.
Chairman Thompson added that at least 95% or 97% of the lots
were platted at 50 feet and some at 45 feet, depending on
where they were located.
Mr. Ampol noted that the zoning in that area was changed in
June, 1975. Mr. Keehr advised that the actual RIA stayed
the same, but the size of .the lot etc. increased.
Chairman Thompson asked if anyone wished to speak in favor
of granting the variance.
Bob Brown, 701 South Seacrest Boulevard, purchased a lot
around and close to the same area and received a variance.
In the mail, he received a notice to make a statement of
whether he was for or against it, and since he is just down
the street, Mr. Brown figured he would come down and speak
in favor of the variance. As far as he was concerned, it will
be no problem on his part.
Chairman Thompson asked if anyone else wished to speak in
favor of the ~r6posed variance. There was no response.
Mr. Ampol observed a drawing of the proposed home. To 'him,
it looked better than an empty lot.
Chairman Thompson asked if anyone wanted to speak against
granting the variance.
Adele Nicholar, 721 N. E. 8th Avenue, Boynton Beach, said
the lot adjoins her property. There were three 50 foot lots
a few years back. One was owned by one person, and two 50
foot lots were owned by another person. The man with the
one 50 foot lot came in here a few years ago, said it was a
hardship and that he had offered to buy some of the land
from the man that owns the 100 feet and couldn't get it, so
he asked for a variance. This Board said it was a hardship
and asked what he could do with 50 feet, so they let him
have it. Ms. Nicholar said the property owners backed down
- 2 -
'.
.. --
, .
(
(
MINUTES BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
BOYNTON BEACH,.FLORIDA
JANUARY 9, 1984
because it is true, if you only have 50 feet, what can you
do. She emphasized that the lot has been standing empty,
and she didn't know how many times it has been sold. Nothing
has ever been done. Ms. Nicholar recalled that the man
showed pictures of a house he was going to build and she
assumed it was done really to gain money by selling the lot.
Without the variance, the man could not have sold the lot.
Ms. Nicholar continued that this party perhaps bought one
lot or perhaps his daughter is buying one lot, but they
always felt as long as the man had the two lots, he had the
amount of property to build the house without a variance.
If this man now sells 50 feet of his 100 feet to Miss
Bottosto and the City ,allows her to go ahead and build a
house on 50 feet, people will then come before the Board in
a short time and say, "Here I am with only 50 feet left.
Now give me a variance." Ms. Nicholar said they will wind
up with three houses where, normally, there should only have
been two; in fact, really only one.
Ms. Nicholar informed the Board that the first man got a
variance; the second party is getting a variance, and a
third party. When a party has 100 feet, Ms. Nicholar felt
there was no hardship involved. The 100 feet should be used
to build the house. Most of the houses there have 60, 75
or 100 feet frontage. There are very few houses with 50 feet
frontage on that street.
George Nicholar, 711 N. E. 8th Avenue, Boynton Beach, has a
lot that measures 85xlOO and felt the same as Ms. Nicholar.
Where the property owners thought there was going to be one
or perhaps two/homes, it now looks like there will be three
homes. That was his objection.
Chairman Thompson determined no one else wished to speak
against granting the variance.
Secretary Gordon read the following correspondence addressed
to Betty Boroni, City Clerk, expressing approval of the
granting of the variance:
1. Letter dated January 4, 1984 from Rose Marcellino, the
owner of several lots located on 7th Avenue.
2. Letter from Salvatore Gatto, owner of a piece of land
located on 7th Avenue, dated January 4, 1984.
3. Letter dated January 4, 1984 from Nicholas Gatto, owner
of a lot on 7th Avenue.
- 3 -
.. --
MINUTES - BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
BOYNTON BEACH, ,FLORIDA
JANUARY 9, 1984
4. Letter from Waldemar Pflepsen and Sue Pflepsen, owners
of a piece of property on 7th Avenue.
Secretary Gordon then read a letter from Daniel E. Magnus
and Frances E. Magnus, dated December 28, 1983, addressed
to Betty S. Boroni, City Clerk, advising the Board to deny
the application.
Mr. Slavin thought a letter from Eva Simond, addressed to
Miss Bottosto, should also be read into the record. Secre-
tary Gordon read:
"At this time, I wouldn't be interested in selling
my lot, as I am hopeful I will be able to build a
home on it in the near future.
Thank you for your interest."
In looking at the survey of the area, Chairman Thompson
found most of the lots were 50 feet and a few were 40 some
feet. The ones near u. S. 1 would come up with 60 or 65
feet. Chairman Thompson did find people owning 1-1/2 or
two lots in the area, which either made it 75 or 100 foot
frontage. Mr. Keehr affirmed that was correct and said the
majority of the lots are 50 feet except at the end of the
blocks where they have to be split up. This particular Lot
43 is the west lot of three vacant lots.
Mr. Mearns asked what lot Eva Simond owned that Miss Bottosto
attempted to buy and Ms. Simond was not interested in sell-
ing. Chairman Thompson believed it was Lot 44 (right next
to it). As our most recent tax books indicate, Mr. Keehr
advised that Lots 43 and 44 are owned by C. W. and Mary
Fleming. However, our tax books are almost a year olq now,
so both of those lots could have been sold in the meantime.
Chairman Thompson commented that Miss Bottosto bought Lot
43 from the Flemings in November.
If an original owner wanted to build on a 50 foot lot before
the new Zoning Codes came in, Mr. Slavin asked if it would
be an automatic thing. Mr. Keehr answered, "Yes." Mr.
Slavin determined that, in effect, there would be two more
homes built regardless.
If the owner of Lots 43 and 44 presently owned those two
lots, Chairman Thompson questioned whether they would be
required to split them up or if they would have to own three
or more lots before being required to split them up. Mr.
Keehr confirmed that you have to own three or more lots and
then you are forced to split them up. If the Flemings owned
- 4 -
. --
(
MINUTES ~ BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
BOYNTON BEACH, 'FLORIDA
JANUARY 9, 1984
it prior to March of 1978, two places could have been built
on each lot (Lots.43 and 44).
Mr. Slavin moved to grant the variance to Miss Bottosto for
the following reasons:
1. It was originally platted as 50 feet. As stated by Mr.
Keehr, if the original owner wanted to build a home there,
there is no way he could have been stopped regardless of
the new zoning codes.
2. There is documentary proof that an attempt was made to
buy the lots or a lot owned by Ev~ Simond.
Mr. Slavin did not think there was any subterfuge here, as
an effort was made to conform to all laws and codes.
Mr. Weinberg seconded the motion. At the request of Chair-
man Thompson, Mrs. Ramseyer took a roll call vote:
Mr. Mearns Aye
Mr. Weinberg Aye
Mr. Ampo1 Aye
Chairman Thompson Aye
Mr. Gordon Aye
Mr. Slavin Aye
/ Mr. Moore Aye
~otion carried 7-0 in favor of granting the request.
Case #49 - Recreation Area designated in REPLAT OF GOLFVIEW
HARBOUR ESTATES
Recorded in Plat Book 46, Pages 142, 143 & 144,
Palm Beach County Records
Request - Relief from zoning regulations, Section.
11-H, requiring 22 off-street parking spaces for
the recreational area with the request that no
parking spaces be required at the recreational
building and pool
Address - 1477 S. W. 25th Place
Applicant - Norman J. Michael, President
Mi1nor Corporation
Secretary Gordon read the application and the letter from
Norman J. Michael, President, Mi1nor Corporation, which was
- 5 -
.. --
MINUTES - BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 9, 1984
addressed to the Chairman, Board of Adjustment, Building
Department, dated November 3, 1983.
Norman J. Michael, President, Milnor Corporation, 1400 S. W.
27th Avenue, Boynton Beach, Florida 33435, referred to his
letter. As stated in their letter, Mr. Michael said they
designed the subdivision to accommodate certain recreational
areas. In selling these various units over the past several
months, they had not been able to generate sales among the
- younger people having families. Therefore, they designed a
small recreational building and a pool (25x40) for the pur-
pose of the adults presently living and purchasing their
villa and townhouse units.
When they went in to ask for a change in the recreational
facilities and the recreational replat was approved, Mr.
Michael told the Board Members nothing was said to them
about the parking. When they went to pick up the permits,
they were then told that parking was a requirement. Mr.
Michael could not understand because they went in, picked up
the Ordinance on parking, and could see nothing in the
Ordinance. Evidently, this was not an updated version of
the Ordinance, and it had nothing about requirements for
recreational facilities.
Mr. Michael stressed that this is not a public facility but
rather a private facility. It is designed merely for those
people who have bought and live in that particular subdivi-
sion. Mr. Michael said they are building in that section
128 villas and townhouses. Some homeowners were present
this evening, and Mr. Michael stated they are quite anxious
to have this facility under construction. They were hoping
the Board would grant the variance due to the fact that it
is private and is not designed to have any public facilities
whatsoever.
Mr. Weinberg asked what the recreation building consists of.
Mr. Michael answered that it is small (approximately 24x47)
and will have bathrooms, facilities for both men and women,
storage room, equipment room for the pool, and an enclosed
area that will facilitate meetings and gatherings of the
homeowners. Mr. AmPol informed Mr. Weinberg the "enclosed
area" Would be like an assembly room. Mr. Michael confirmed
that was correct and said it is primarily designed for maybe
card playing or a meeting room of the Directors. It is not
made to accommodate any more than 30 or 40 people at the
most.
As stated in their letter, Mr. Michael said they had
positioned the recreational facility to allow anybody within
their subdivision to walk to a facility.
- 6 -
. --
(
(
MINUTES - BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 9, 1984
Mr. Mearns noted paragraph ee) of Mr. Michael's letter says
they intend to build a recreational building. He questioned
whether Mr. Michael's intent was based upon his getting
approval to not have 22 parking spaces, which would make
more ground available for building the villas. Mr. Michaels
answered, "No sir." He said the permits are ready to be
picked up. They had the plans for the "rec" building
approved, and the permit has been issued. The pool has
- already been approved by the Board of Health, and the permit
is ready to be picked up.
When they went to piCk up the permits to start construction,
Mr. Michael said that was when they were told about the
parking. If they are 9ranted the variance, Mr. Michael
assured the Members that tomorrow morning the permits will
be pulled. He said they have already dug the footer for the
recreational building, and it is just lying there, and they
cannot proceed.
Mr. Ampo1 determined that the recreation building is strictly
for the homeowners and their guests, not the public.
The deed to the property was in 1975. In 1975, Mr. Slavin
asked if parking spaces were needed in order to construct a
recreational building. Mr. Keehr replied, "No." Mr. Slavin
wanted to know when it was amended. Mr. Keehr answered that
the change was in March of 1982.
According to a building of that size, "X" amount of parking
spaces are required, but Mr. Keehr informed Mr. Slavin it
was not based on the size of the structure. It is based on
the number of dwellings withil} a certain radius. Mr. Keehr
thought Mr. Michael was correct in his statement that .there
was no parking required for a recreational building when he
built his first one. However, he did not think Mr. Michael
had the up-to-date Ordinance passed in 1982, which requires
parking for a recreational building, and he did not believe
Mr. Michael was familiar with that on his submittal.
If Mr. Michael did away with the meeting room or card room
and just had bathroom facilities, a dressing room, and storage
room, Mr. Slavin wondered if he would be required to have
parking spaces. Mr. Keehr answered, "No, then you would
have a pool with bathrooms which would require different
regulations for parking." Pools are another item that do
require parking.
Mr. Keehr said this particular site tabulated down to 22
parking spaces. Mr. Michael's other ArecA building would
- 7 -
.. --
MINUTES - BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 9, 1984
probably even require more parking under today's new Ordi-
nance. Mr. Keehr advised that Mr. Michael has no other
violations and nothing else would stop him from building.
Mr. Michael added that their subdivision was approved in
total much earlier than when the new regulations came into
effect. In fact, it was approved in the early part of 1981.
He reiterated that they were unaware that the parking require-
- ments had changed. Not being a public facility and being
in walking distance, Mr. Michael thought there was merit in
his petition before the Board.
When the replat of Golfview Harbour was recorded in September
of this year, Mr. Keehr told the Board it showed an area for
the "recIte During that replatting, Mr. Michael was not
informed of any additional parking requirements because it
did not come up. Mr. Keehr added that it would not come up
at that time.
Mr. Arnpol noted that Mr. Michael and his wife took title to
the property in November of 1975.
The Recording Secretary presented a survey, and Mr. Michael
showed site plans to the Members.
In designing the facility, Mr. Michael wanted to make it
less upkeep and less of a burden on the people as far as
expenses because maintenance costs get out of hand and sky-
rocket.
Mr. Gordon noted Mr. Michael stated this particular area is
approximately 400 yards from ~he homeowners. That is the
length of four football fields. Mr. Gordon asked if all of
the homeowners could make that 400 yards. Mr. Michael
clarified that the furtherest away would be 400 yards.
Chairman Thompson asked about sidewalks. Mr. Michael
informed him that they have walks on all public roads. On
S. w. 25th Place, they are installing sidewalks. On S. w.
14th Street, there are sidewalks. As they go, Mr. Michael
said they put the walks in, so the walks are there. Some of
them are not in because they have not constructed those
units.
Mr. Slavin recalled Mr. Michael said he had dug the footings
for the clubhouse. The pool area has not been touched. Mr.
Slavin thought the architect could redesign the area to give
him the necessary parking spaces. Mr. Michael advised that
it is impossible to get 22 spaces in there. They just do
- 8 -
. --
(
( -
MINUTES - BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 9, 1984
not have the space. The average parking space is 9xl8 or
.10x20, which is 200 square feet x 22 x 20.
In previous recreational facilities, Mr. Michael said it has
been their experience when they are built and completed and
the homeowners begin to use them that after the second or
third year, the activity around the recreational areas
begins to drop off. The only people who use the pool and
recreational facilities are guests and possibly the home-
owners during the summer months and maybe a few times in the
winter months.
Mr. Michael really thought the relief they were seeking was
justifiable when you are looking ahead two or three years
from now. Also, i~ is not necessary when you are that close
in walking distance. Mr. Michael reiterated that they are
still dealing with a private facility. It is not public.
With the fencing and the way it is situated in that corner,
Mr. Michael emphasized that it will be private.
Mr. John Bishel, 1468 s. W. 25th Place, is in the same
building that Mr. Michael has his model home and sales
office in. Mr. Bishel's property is directly across the
street from where the pool and clubhouse is projected.
When he looked at the plot Mr. Michael has in his sales room
eight months ago, Mr. Bishel bought his home on the basis
that the clubhouse would be there and he and his guests could
use the pool.
Another thing he liked about it was between 25th Place and
27th Avenue on-Congress, it is completely walled. From 25th
Place to 23rd Avenue, it is walled to the canal so, with the
exception of 27th Avenue and 25th Avenue entering the project,
those are the only two places to get into it.
Mr. Bishel referred to the pool that was constructed where
the townhouses are and said it is fenced in and landscaped.
You can drive by it and not know it is there. Mr. Bishel
was told that was what he would get when he bought the
property. He referred to sidewalks which are in the pro-
ject.
Mr. Bishel thought the amount of people who would have to go
a long distance to get to the pool was overestimated and
said it was like three city blocks or three 10'0 foot blocks.
Mr. Bishel referred to a complex he lived in at Pompano
Beach where they had no parking whatsoever. He talked about
security, people getting to the pool,' and said he could not see
- 9 -
.. --
I
MINUTES - BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 9, 1984
any need for the parking areas and thought it would bring
more problems instead of helping the area.
Mr. Ampol asked if Mr. Bishel was for or against the variance.
Mr. Bishel was in favor of the variance.
Mr. Weinberg asked if the Board had juriSdiction to eliminate
an entire parking area. This is an entire new Ordinance,
and Mr. Weinberg questioned whether the Board had the
- authority to do away with 22 parking spaces. He could see
reducing the number of spaces to 16 or 18 but wondered if
the Board had the right to do away with the entire parking
area. Mr. Keehr believed the Board would have the right if
they would find the applicant in line with the reasons
required to grant a v~riance.
Margaret Stafford, 1441 s. W. 26th Avenue, Boynton Beach,
has a son that is in a wheelchair. He gets allover the
place. Mrs. Stafford was sure they did not need the parking
for all the trouble it would probably cause and hoped they
could do without the parking.
Bernard H. Kahn, who lives next door to Mrs. Stafford,
confirmed that Mrs. Stafford has a son that is in a wheel-
chair and everyone would be amazed to see how he gets around.
Mrs. Stafford's son gets to the pool site with no trouble.
Mr. Kahn was also in favor of Mr. Michael's request for an
exception because he did not feel they need the parking
space. He thought it would be an unwanted and unnecessary
headache. When Mr. Kahn bought his apartment, he too was
told there wouid be a recreation facility and a pool, and
he is anxiously awaiting them so they will be open, particu-
larly in light of the new construction that will be going
on at Boynton's beach.
Mr. Richard Drummond, 1425 S. W. 25th Avenue, Villa A, Boynton
Beach, wanted to support Mr. Michael in his request. Mr.
Drummond referred to kids running around in cars in Golfview
Harbour and expressed that he thought this was one place
where they will end up parking. He was not in favor of the
parking. Other people will be coming in, parking their cars,
and using the pool area. Mr. Drummond thought a short distance
walk to the pool was not out of reason.
Elizabeth Cook, 1468 S. W. 48th Street, Boynton Beach, lives
across the street and is against the parking area. She was
sure it would give them a lot of hardships.
- 10 -
.. --
-'---~~-r..;,:-
" '-
COIlMI.lNJTY 1\PPE~.RANC.r; BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, ~LORIDA
Date
7/17/84
Preliminary ( )
Final tX)
Request for Change ( )
Sign Approval ( )
Project Name
Pylon Interstate Park
Legal Description
Address of Site I-95 and Woolbright Road
Owner Pylon-Boynton Joint Venture - James Brad~el. #(305) 997-5499
Architect Briel, Rhame, Poynter & Houser Tel. #(305) 997-2025
Archltects-Englneers, Inc.
All meetings of the Community Appearance Board are open to the PUblic.
IMPORTANT - Requirements for Review:
IN ORDER FOR YOUR PLANS TO BE REVIEWED, A REPRESENTATIVE WILL NEED
TO BE PRESENT AT THE MEETING.
Preliminary Review Requirements:
A. Site Plan (including the General Landscape Development)
B. Building Plan
C. All Exterior Elevations with material designations
D. Outline specifications of facade and roof treatments
E. Sketches of all signs and their dimensions
F. General Exterior color description (including signs)
Final Review Requirements:
A. Site plan showing setbacks, landscaping, all outside areas and their
uses. Landscaping may be in general terms, but the heights and
general types of plants and trees must be noted, includipg lig~~ing,
fences, or any outside permanent fixtures and calculations or
parking lot landscaped areas (lO% minimum).
B. Building Plans
C. Detailed drawings for all signs'
D. Exterior surface treatments (including roofs)
E. Exterior color scheme (including that of signs). All colors must
be designated by sample.
F. Six (6) sets of working drawings and specifications.
Date of Review
Follow-up Date
Decision of review (as stated in official minutes of the meeting) :
Commur.ity Appearance Board
Chair::-.::ln
CAB Form #1
i C it\' 0 f Bovnton Beach
~--::!L
... .J . ~
COj.i!-1tJNITY APPEARt'-.NCE BOl-_RD
COLOR AND MATERIAL SCHEDULE
Date 7/17/84
.Job Name ~ylon Intersate Park
Location I-95 and Woolbright Road, Boynton Beach, Florida
Applicant Pylon-Boynton Joint Venture
Address 5301 North Federal Highway, Boca Raton,Flori@!. # 997-5499
COLUMNS
MATERIAL
None exposed
None exposed
Glass
None
None
Glass Curtain wall
COLOR (Name)
SURFACE
BEAMS
DOORS
Reflective
FASCIA
. GABLE ENDS
GLASS
Reflective Lt.Grn.
GRILL PA..~ELS
INSECT SCREEN
None
RAILINGS
None
ROOF
Flat B.V. Roof
SHUTTERS
None
SOFFIT
Stucco
White
WALLS
Glass Curtainwall
Reflective
OTHERS (as required)
Applicant
CAD Form #2
City of Boynton B0'-~
l2-5-75
i
.,..=.-
1-
PERFORMANCE
BON D'
KNOW ALL MEN BY T~SE PRESENTS:
Pylon-Boynton Joint Venture and
That Mouw Associates, Inc. (hereinafter called the
"principal"), and Insurance Canoany of North AmPri oa a surety company
authorized to do business in the state of Florida (hereinafter called
the "Surety"), are held and firmly bound unto the City of Boynton
Beach, a municipal corporation of the State of ~orida (hereinafter
called the "city"), in the full and just sum of;mfir~XdTRb~o'oh?~~~SlWiBO}HWld:CeJ.
lawful money of the united States of America, to be paid to the City,
to which payment well and truly to be made we bind ourselves, our
heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly
and severally, firmly by these presents:
WHEREAS, the above bounded principal, as a condition precedent
to the approval by the City of a plat of a certain subdivision known
as *(See Below ) , has submitted engineering and
other construction plans for the Required Improvements prescribed by
the Subdivision and Platting Regulations of the city, pertaining to
the said subdivision (hereafter referred to as the "Subdivision Improve-
ments Plans"), copies of which plans are attached hereto and by
reference made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, it was one of the conditions of the said Subdivision
and Platting Regulations that this bond be executed;
NOW, THEREFORE, the conditions of this obligation are such that
if the above bounded Principal shall in all respects perform the
Subdivision Improvements Plans within the time specified in the Sub-
division and Platting Regulations of the City, and shall indemnify
and save harmless the City against or from all claims, costs, expenses,
damages, injury or loss, including engineering, legal and contingent
costs which the City may sustain on account'of the failure of the
Principal to perform the Subdivision Improvements Plans within the time
specified in the said Subdivision and platting Regulations, then this
obligation shall be void; otherwise to be and remain in full force and
effect.
THE SURETY UNCONDITIONALLY COVENANTS AND AGREES THAT if the
Principal fails to perform all or any part of the construction work as
set forth in the Subdivision Improvements plans, within the time
specified, the Surety will forthwith perform and complete the said
construction work and pay the cost thereof, including, but not limited
to, engineering, legal and contingent costs, and will indemnify and
save harmless the City as aforesaid. Should the Surety fail or refuse
to perform and complete the said improvements, the city, in view of the
public interest, health, safety and welfare factors involved and the
inducement in approving and filing the said plat, shall have the right
to resort to any and all legal remedies against the principal and the
Surety, or either, ~th at law and in equity, including specifically
specific performance, to which the principal and Surety unconditionally
agree.
*(Parcel 2 of the Plat of Commerce Center, Recorded in Plat Book 46, pages 126 and 127 of
Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida).
.("
THE PRINCIPAL AND THE SURETY FURTHER JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY AGREE
THAT the City, at its option, shall have the right to construct or,
pursuant to public advertisement and receipt of bids, cause to be
constructed the aforesaid improvements in case the principal should
fail or refuse to do so in accordance with the Subdivision Improvements
Plans and within the time specified, and in the event the City should
-exercise and give effect to such right, the principal and the Surety
'shall be jointly and severally liable hereunder to reimburse the City
the total cost thereof, including, but not limited to, engineering,
legal and contingent costs, together with any damages, either direct
or consequential, which maybe sustained on account of the failure of
the Principal to carry out and perform the Subdivision Improvements
Plans within the time specified.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Principal and the Surety
these presents this 25th day. of September
Address:
5301 N. Federal Highway
Boca Raton, Florida 33432
.~~
Insurance Company of North Arrerica
SURETY
By: .~
(' attorney-in~
ower of Attorney to
be attached}J.T.Kirkland,Jr.
Address:
1901 South Conqress Avenue
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435
ATTEST :i::ff 0"") e ~ft;;
Witnesses:
Dh~~mrU~
~~a~
i
.
STAFF COMMENTS
FIDELITY FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK
AT PYLON INTERSTATE PLAZA
SITE PLAN MODIFICATION
NONE