REVIEW COMMENTS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 90-459
October 11, 1990
TO: Technical Review Board Members
~.lInllt~ Interim Planning Director
Vincent Finizio Admin. Coord. of Engineering
Ed Allen Fire Chief
Ed Hillery Police Chief
John GUidry Utilities Director
Bob Eichorst Public Works.Director
Charlie Frederick - Parks & Recreation Director
THRU: Don Jaeger, Building and Zoning Director~
FROM: Michael E. Haag, Zoning and Site Administrator
RE: ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
Quail Run (Costain Florida)
Aspen Road
Coscan Florida, Inc.
The above referenced proj ect is nearing completion and prior to
the Building Department finalizing the site,
ensure that your department has no outstanding
that need to be rectified, (excluding issues
entirely with a city approved surety).
I would like to
or pending .issues
that are covered
If the issues are related to permits issued by the Building
Department, please provide this department with the permit number and
nature of unresolved issues. If the unresolved issues are not
permi t related, notify the owner or the owners agent to ensure
that the issues are rectified.
...
J. Scott Miller
Bill Cavanaugh, Fire
Pete Mazzella, Utilities
Lt. Dale Hammack, Police
Warren Shelhamer, Public
Don Johnson, Inspector
MEH:ald
QUAILRN.SDD
Please respond to this office within ten (10) days so that we may
of OCC~~1?~~~ou for your
OCT 1'"
I\A . "lgqr-
NtvlNG D
_ ohn wi~Kler, Parks &
Kev llahan, Forester
J. Broomf1e d, Comm. Imp.
Department Typist
File
Works
~ ~ 6~P.tvC_
(j) ~ ~...~. SiAJ ~fc~ - a20~L~
~ /~~'/~1t#~ Sed'/?
./~~ r tt/uu-/~C/ (12-~ ,
txJ~ @ ~..~~~ 671-~t
~~L ;pLtJ-~ _
M E M 0 RAN DUM
July 11, 1988
TO: FINANCE DEPT.
FROM: JAMES J. GOLDEN, SENIOR CITY PLANNER
RE: PROCESSING OF CHECKS
Attached please find the following checks:
James Driscol. for Stonehaven MPM, in the amount of $200.00;
Benjamin Aaron, for Glass Bldg. Parking Lot SP, in the amount of
$300.00;
James W. McManus, Casa Blanca MP, in the amount of $400.00;
D.R. Assoc., for Cross Creek Centre, SPM, in the amount of
$200.00;
Keshavarz & Assoc., for Boynton Lakes Plaza SP, in the amount of
$350.00;
A&A Fences, Inc., for Solomon SPM, in the amount of $200.00;
North South Construction Corp, for Catalina SP, in the
amount of $300.00; (ck. #5927)
North South Construction Corp, for Congress Lakes SP, in the
amount of $350.00; (ck. #5928)
North South Construction Corp, for Catalina SPM, in the amount oE
$200.00; (ck. #5926)
Coscan, for Quail Run SPM, in the amount of $200.00;
Land Design South, for Tara Oaks SP, in the amount of $290.00;
(ck. #1075)
Land Design South, for Tara Oaks SP, in the amount of $60.00;
(ck. #1073)
Rays Auto Storage, Inc., for Auto Save ERC Permit, in the amount
of $120.00; (ck. #123)
Rays Auto Storage, Inc., for Auto Save ERC, in the amount of
$80.00; (ck. #116)
North South Construction Corp., for Congress Lakes MPM, in the
amount of $200.00.
Account Numbers for deposit are indicated on the backs of the
checks.
~t.~
~ES I. GOLDEN
JJG:ro
Attachments
STAFF COMMENTS
QUAIL RUN PHASE I
SITE PLAN MODIFICATION
Building Department See attached memo
Engineering Department See attached memo
Utilities Department See attached memo
Planning Department Indicate building setback
from S.W. 26th Avenue for
four-plexes on sheets 2
of 18 and 3 of 18.
MEMORANDUJ~.
TO
Carmen Annunziato
Planning Director
D"T~
July 5, 1988
FILE
F"OM
Don Jaeger
Building Department
SUBnCT SITE PLAN MODIFICATION:
QUAIL RUN
As a condition of site plan modification, the following comments should
be incorporated into the related documents by the applicant:
1. All buildings, two (2) stories or more in height, must be automatically
sprinkled in accordance with NFiPA 13 as modified by NFiPA 231 and
NFiPA 231C.'\-
2. All structures must comply with Table 600 of the Standard Building
Code.
3. Handicapped parking stalls are required for guest parking areas in
compliance with Section 508 of the Countywide Amendments to the
Standard Building Code, 1985 Edition. Blue paint is required for
striping handicapped parking stalls.
4. Since a variance was granted for the purpose of deleting curbing
around driveway areas to individual units, the curbing should be
deleted from the engineering plans on sheet 12 of 18 where these
conditions exist.
5. Plant material, 36 inches in height, is required between parking
areas and public rights-of-way.
6. A six (6) foot CBS wall is required around the dumpster pad. The
landscape plans show sod and a Royal Poinciana in this location.
7. The City Commission must approve the placing of landscape accent
lighting in the medians in the public right-of-way on S.W. 26th Street.
The applicant's prompt compliance with the preceding comments will insure
a timely permitting process.
Do
DJ:bh
XC: E. E. Howell
*This requirement will be contingent upon Ordinance #88-32 receiving
second and final reading from the City Commission.
~ E ~1 () R 1\ N [) lJ ~
July 7, 1988
T(): ~r. Jim Golden
Senior City Planner
FRO~: Tom Clark
City Engineer
RE: Quail Run Site Plan ~odification
COMMENTS:
1. Please note that the private spot light fixtures planned
to uplift Palm trees in the curbed median of S.W. 26th
Street at S.W. 23rd Avenue and at Woolbright Road are
privately owned and operated and are occupying a public
right-of-way. I don't believe this should be a problem
but should be brought to the attention of the P.& Z. Board
and the City Commission for their approval.
2. Copies of the Florida Power & Light Company lighting plans
for the parking lot should be forwarded to the City for
review.
3. Street lighting plans (see note No. 3 on sheet 2 of the
Paving & [)rainage plans) "by others" have not been reviewed
or approved and should be submitted as soon as possible.
4. Florida Power & Light Company's lighting plan for S.W. 26th
Street and Woolbright Road have not been submitted.
~ ~ d2t-
Tom Clark
TAC/ck
MEMORANDUM
To: Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director
From: Joe C. Swan, P.E. )?1~
for John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities ~
Date: July 6, 1988
Subject: TRB Review - Quail Run - Site Plan Modification
We can approve this plan, subject to the following conditions:
1. New water services shall be established as required. Existing
services which are improperly located must be plugged at the
main.
2. Sanitary services which will now fall within driveway areas
must have a 6" cleanout and access cover.
dmt
be: Peter Mazzella
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
~,,;
,.-
"
CONTENT:
PREPARED BY:
r)
'_...r"
....,
DRAINAGE REPORT
KIRSNER-COGEN PROPERTY
PROPOSED PUD
IN THE NE 1/4 OF SEC 31-45-43
AT THE NW CORNER OF CONGRESS AVENUE AND
GOLF ROAD, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
THIS REPORT SUPPLEMENTS A MASTER PAVING AND
DRAINAGE PLAN PREPARED BY SCHWEBKE-SHISKIN & ASSOC.
FILE NO. AJ-1384, BASED ON A LAND PLAN PREPARED BY
WALTER TAFT BRADSHAW & ASSOC.
THE ENCLOSED CALCULATIONS CONFORM TO THE
REQUIREMENTS FOR "BASIS OF REVIEW" BY THE
SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGRMENT DISTRICT.
SCHWEBKE-SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
18800 N. W. 2nd AVENUE
MIAMI, FLORIDA 33169
_ Secretary-Treasurer
S P. SHISKIN,
ESSIONAL ENGINEER #5615
OF FLORIDA
o R NO. 131826
AUGUST 1978
DRAINAGE DESIGN
KIRSNER-COGEN PROPERTY
IN NE 1/4 SEC 31-45-43, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PROJECT =
125.7 Acres (Includes adjacent R/W for Golf Road & Congress Ave.)
LAKE AREA
35.0 Acres
PERVIOUS AREA = 42.7 Acres (See Page 2)
MINIMUM ROAD ELEV. = 13.0
AVERAGE GRADE OF PROJECT = 13.5
MINIMUM FLOOR ELEV. = 14.0 (100 year)
L-27 MAINTAINED WATER ELEV. 8.5 (From Lake Worth Drainage District)
ALLOWABLE DISCHARGE INTO L-26 (C-16 Basin)
Q=(~+ 47) 0.2 = 49.7 Cfs TOTAL ALLOWED
Jl):T
DIRECT INPUT INTO L-26
TWO ISOLATED AREAS, BEING AREAS NO. 1 AND NO. 2 AS SHOWN ON THE
DRAINAGE AREA'S PLAN, WILL DRAIN DIRECTLY INTO L-26. USING THE
RATIONAL FORMULA, Q = AIC, THE DISCHARGES ARE SHOWN BELOW. C = 60%,
INTENSITY WAS ASSUMED AT 5"/Hr. THIS APPEARS CONSERVATIVE SINCE
MAXIMUM INTENSITY DURING PEAK OF 5 DAY, 25 YEAR STORM IS 2.93"/Hr.
AREA NO. 1
4.4 ACi Q
13.2 cfs
AREA NO. 2
3.0 ACi Q
9.0 cfs
REMAINING ALLOWABLE INPUT INTO L-26
AREA NO.3 (118.3 Ac) = 27.5 cfs
-1-
CALCULATIONS OF PERVIOUS AREAS
NOTE:
TABULATIONS BASED ON LAND PLAN BY
WALTER TAFT BRADSHAW
USE
TOTAL
ACREAGE
IMPERVIOUS
% AREA
PERVIOUS
% AREA
ROAD R/W 17.5 50 8.8 Ac 50 8.7 Ac
VILLAS 15.4 40 6.2 Ac 60 9.2 Ac
TOWNHOUSE 4.4 40 1.8 Ac 60 2.6 Ac
GARDEN APTS. 27.1 65 17.6 Ac 35 9.5 Ac
REC. AREAS 4.3 10 .4 Ac 90 3.9 Ac
CIVIC 3.9 30 1.2 Ac 70 2.7 Ac
COMMERCIAL 13.3 90 12.0 Ac 10 1.3 Ac
BUFFERS 4.8 100 4.8 Ac
LAKE 35.0 100 35.0 Ac
TOTAL
125.7
66%
83.0 Ac
34%
42.7 Ac
-2-
GROUND STORAGE AND SCS CURVE NUMBER
AVERAGE GRADE IN PROJECT 13.5
CONTROL WATER LEVEL = 9.0 (By Weir)
DEPTH TO WATER TABLE = 4. 5'
FROM S F W M D TABLES
4.5' DEVELOPED COMPACTED 10" AVAILABLE STORAGE
GROUND STORAGE = 42. 7 X 10 35.6 AF
12
S = 35.6
125.7
3.4" OVER TOTAL AREA
CN
1000
3.4 + 10
74.6 (SAY 75)
WEIR CREST ELEV.
STORE FIRST INCH OF RUNOFF ABOVE ELEV. 8.5
DRAINAGE AREA ATTRIBUTAL TO LAKE (AREA NO.3)
125.7 Ac - (4.4 Ac + 3.0 Ac) = 118.3 Ac
118.3 Ac X .0833 = 0.28'
35
8.5 = 0.28 = 8.78
WEIR CREST HELD AT ELEV. 9.0
SELECTED 3 FT. WIDE WEIR WITH 450 FT. OF 36" CMF OUTFALL
"'--
-3-
\
-I
-J
~
......
"':)
'"
~
~
.
~
~
<::)
\t..
an
-
~
-
-J
\U
~ Q'
LU lU
-::::, ~
Q: ~
:::, ~
~
l.U()
~ .t,u
~<
~-
~~
<.I\~
- -
Cl ~
OJ
\9 ~
:"t" <:)
(,(')
Q
\U
~
~
Q)
~
<:)
~
~
~
(p
~
">-
~
.
~
g
l()
..
'-U
~
ot ~
- ~
LJ."
~ -><
~
,.
~
~
C;:)
~
Q.
~
"
~
<.9
~
.
-
<:J
*
<:>
~
-
<::)
~
-:-
Q.
~
<:::i
<?
<:::2
-
....
-
-
('0 '/I't) '/i} .a.9V1S
<:)
~
.g
Q
t'
<:)
~
Cl ~.
\{\ <:)
I
\U
':>
~~
~
Q
(J)
-
Q
<:::7
~
\
\
\
O<a
o
6\
---:i;
-6-
:..-.:. '. ~
CALCULATE 100 YEAR FLOOD ELEV.
(ASSUME NO DISCHARGE)
100 Yr - 24 Hr. RAINFALL = 13.7"
13.7" X 1.568 = 21.48" FIVE DAY RAINFALL
RAINFALL DEPOSIT = 125.7 X 21.48 = 225.0 A.F.
12
GROUND STORAGE = 35.6 A.F.
SURFACE STORAGE = 189.4 A.F.
FLOOD ELEV. = 13.6 (FROM STAGE STORAGE CURVE)
MIN. FLOOR ELEV. @ 14.0 IS SAFE
25 YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION
(ASSUME NO DISCHARGE)
25 Yr. - 24 Hr. RAINFALL
10.7"
10.7" X 1.568 = 16.78"
RAINFALL DEPOSIT = 125.7 X 16.78
12
175.75 A.F.
GROUND STORAGE = 35.6 A.F.
SURFACE STORAGE = 140.15 A.F.
FLOOD ELEV. = 12.5 (FROM STAGE STORAGE CURVE)
MIN. ROAD ELEV. @ 13.0 IS SAFE
-5-
-.J a
-.J
~
""--
~
'"
~
~
.
...,J
~
<:)
~
I!\
.
~
-
-J
l.U
VI ~
\.U lU
::::::, ......
~ 'q"
:::J ~
u
l.U()
~ .\U
(;(<
~-
~~
~"\ -:;z
- -
Q~
OJ
\9~
~~
<1'
(l
LU
~
~
to
~
<:3
~
~
~
(p
~
">-
~
,
">
~
l/)
...
tu
~
~ ~
- ~
lL
~ ~
~
,.
<;;t
~
(:)
-
Q.
~
<:.,)
..
<.9
~
.
-
<:)
~
<>
~
<::) Q# <:) <>
~ ~ - <:::)
~ - -
~ .-..-.
La.'l!.~_1!2... ._._~~!.s_..._._~___
o
~
2
Q
l'-
<;:)
\S
<:) ~.
~ <J
I
\U
~
~ ~
~
Q
(J)
-
Q
<::J
~
Q
~
\
\
\
o~
<:)
6\
.1;.;.1
,
-6-'
"...0
~
~
II
V)
":;-
Q
-
_"
-J
-J
i1:
:c::
l--<
-<
~
~
:::J
Q
:x:
<!1 ~
~ <:--J
-
h ~')
"':J
. C) ~
! (): ::::
I
I~ ~
,C:!' UJ
l~ ~
i (J')
I
I
~- -
I
,
II
-J
-<
6
1-
~
\(\
~
II
~
<::>
1-
V)
:c::
C>
l--<
~
P.
~
~
~ 0)
o ~
u C/)
~-- -----..-
o
~ ~~~
3 3 ~ I
~ ~_Q<:J
o O~ ~
U ~C/)-
--.-.
~
0- en
~ ~"'-<'
:3 ~ -5 ~
~ 0.:3 ~
u 1-~-
~
<>0 en
~ ]~
3 <:J 'F
~ -q <:J
o ''<! ~
u ~-
cl
t-- en
~ ~
E ~-
:3 <:J-q
~ ,~'3
u ~_-
cl
:~ .::> '= "'-<'
E '='0
:j <:) I
~ ~ ~ <:J
3 u~~
cl
: ~::> '= ~
E '=~
:j 0 <:J
~ E ~ ~
o :j::j --.<
u U~-
cl
::>
-: :g~'~
E <:0--=~
:3 :::3~<:J
~ 3'd-~
u U~-
t'<)~
~ ~
~ ~~
u ~~
cl
: - ~'-:
J ~g ~
oS::; :::,-
8 ~ c"J-
-- ~ ] -:
E i5J <>
-J ~ -...J -.,)
~ == ~~
o .~ _-
u ~,....
---- - -'---
,
..... .
o ~1 ~.... .........1 I.''"' <i\ c-
i.;.,"? IJI c: ~ ~r) \j ()
Q~ UJ ~~ 'Y \:i c-: ~
-. .-- --.- -- ---
r-~
r- _
......: ~
-
o G
c
o
r--~
r-o-
--.: ~
o
\'}
-
~~ -;.
~ '- ~
",' \.'-\ ....
~. ~
- ~
1.!1
<C. \.')
. -
Q -...:
L(1 ("'\
o <:( ~
.
G
G ~ ~
...:: ~")
--
t' ') tf)
<0 0
t'" ~
~) \:"
~~~~
- - ~ ~'"\
..~ ~
'lI ~
- ~....;
..:;c:-
~ \1)
- ~"\
<5 <)
r-J t:V
~ r:-
-...: ~
-- ---
~) C ,,-'.3
\::''' \f) ~
-::-.::-
"
--- - -: _.~.-. - ---
o ~ ~
<.S t m
" C) <:J
- - -
-- .- -- -..-
~r'
~
.....
Q~
-", I
~"} C> \:'->
f- r- 'l;.~
-
l.')
~)
~l
\
.
N
- -- 1---.
-
o
Gr-~-
C'1 - ~") ~ -
Q 0 ~ 0
-'"' - "'') ~ -
~ l') m c- u>
-..f~~~~
~~
t'-' \S
-.d- l[)
,,)
~
l
l.1~
f-
-
t.0
~
~
-t;
~ 0....~.--c:;J
~r- ((j - 1:'" G
_~. _r:' -:-
Q;' Q -:, <;::) ;. ()
-::. --. -- - J ~
;:;
~
\
.!1
"C; ~N :'---1-0 ---
-- ~ . <:: -~ \.f> .; p-
..... _ ''-''':~;,,' .-..J> t'-'
1... "\ "7 C',; ~ -<::;" ('0- \:'" -
tZ ~.~ ~ \S ::., \()
-
.
-.;;;-
r-
<:;f'.
. ._ Q .;::: ~ f\
-:1__ ~J.::..r-
r--- --It..'..
'-.) _ ~ r-- ' .'-
\ ,..- ,,; t-J ~ lJ : ;; ~
..;,] ", (""",- ~.,
~. -J
<:>
....;:
~ :-t::=- ~ ~b
_ 0.~
~s~:tg:;i~
*
~ '-'CJ ,-
li')~0-~'~ <)
- .-: ,'''' ~
...s .:l li") ~, ",j. .
('l::'C'-J.:J-';:'~
~ $
;, .
~Cr
t'J
r-
c:
~
~ b
-..:. -..:
~ ~l
- ,-
li:" Q; ~) r-- \1) ~ ",'"'\
\:'") t-- ~ ;;:-') ~ ~ - -
~ \..'") . r--: 6S m 0= ==
~
~
-
c-
~
~"'l
-
t.O \.S
~ Q:.)
~ \}0
.--
rJ((;~~
r ~ ... "'..
UJ ~ ~ c:
o 0
<:) <:)
~ 0:'.
~ ,\.:)
.
<;: C C C
- -------
~ S ~
C- c-::. - c-=.
\.D 4') i.,I"'\
~
-
~
~
~~\.{)C[-~
~ ~ Q .l..~ l.P
<._~~~
-----
" <1.
UJ '-'
- 0::.:
o 0
---
~
1'-3
r-~c-J
r- \.1) r-
- \.'"' -.....7
cj)
;-Ji
-=. -.: ...:. -.:. ...:
& ~ 8 g 2 ~
~~. ~<i: ~-; ~ ~ --s
'- '- 'V '-- r- c:-
.~ ~. ~ i-~ ~-~--i~~r~ ~i; ~
o
<>
c
':'.;
"
'\
"'"
u.!
-J
~
"'
-..
~
~
--'
~
-CJ
~
~")
-
h
o 0
~ <:;
"'<;;;
~ ~
\JJ
Q
~
~
~
o
\I\
r-::..C)
~~
~
'\.
-::z
~
J'l
~
~
.---v~~-
I ~ ~
~ G
-
-
<::n_ -J
~
\.tJ <fJ
G -
~
~ ~
<.) 0
<.;> ....-
ab-
x~
S~
<: ~
~-
---
-71
SUMMARY
The Primary Drainage Outfall is the Lake Worth Drainage District Canal L-26.
This is in the C-16 basin of the South Florida Water Management District.
The outfall limitations issued by the District for this project is 49.7 cfs
for a 25 year, 5 day storm. The Storm Water Management Plan Design conforms
with this requirement.
The Secondary Drainage Outfall is a 35 acre lake which will receive drainage
outfall from 118.3 acres of the 125.7 acre project. The lake discharges into
L-26 via a 3 Ft. wide weir with 450 Ft. of 36" CMP connecting pipe. The
control discharge of the weir is at elevation 9.0 while the maintained level
of L-26 is 8.5. This retention exceeds the requirement of theS F W M D to
retain the first inch of runoff. A "bleeder-slot" will be incorporated in
the weir to slowly restore the lake to the maintained elevation of 8.5 during
non-storm periods.
Two isolated drainage areas will drain directly into L-26. They comprise a
total of 7.4 acres. Extensive piping would be needed to drain these areas into
the lake, and since these are small areas, a practical approach was taken.
Calculations show the 100 year, 5 day Flood Elevation to be 13.6 and 14.0 will
be the minimum floor elevation. Calculations also show the maximum stage of
the lake to be at elevation 10.94 for a 25 year 5 day storm, the minimum road
grade is at elevation 13.0 and therefore safe.
Lake Worth Drainage District issued a maintained elevation of 8.5 for L-26.
Although detailed records are not available, they anticipate a 25 year storm
to stage the Canal to an elevation of approximately 12.5. If this occurs, the
lake will not discharge into the canal. In effect, the lake will act as a
backwater retention area. This will not impose a flood threat to our develop-
ment with minimum grades at 13.0. The effect of this will be to provide a
retention area for ultimate C-16 outfall which would be favorable. If a
problem were to occur in our development due to overflow drainage from the
canal, it could easily be remedied by installing a flap-gate on the 36" CMP
discharge pipe. All calculations for outfall into L-26 were based on the
maintained level of elevation 8.5. If L-26 approached a 12.5 elevation for
a 25 year storm our discharge will be reduced. However, this imposes no prob-
lem to the development since calculations show that a 25 year 5 day storm would
produce a flood elevation of 12.50 with no discharge whatsoever, and the
minimum road grade is 13.0.
Water quality will be maintained to a desirable standard in the drainage
system. All road drainage will be handled by grass swales. Future develop-
ment in the Commercial Area and Apartment Tracts will no doubt have consider-
able impervious area. In those areas where drainage cannot be handled by grass
swales, an oil and sediment trap will be incorporated in the final drainage
structure prior to outfall into the lake. The lake will have 7:1 slopes for
safety, errosion prevention and nutrient uptake. There will be no drainage
designed to sheet flow directly into the lakes.
\
,
'~
-8-
~
The project area was previously mined for muck, and all the muck has been
removed, resulting in the existing lake. The soil is predominately natural
sand with good percolation and suitable for residential development. Fill
needed to bring the project to final grade will come from the existing lake.
The lake will be partially filled and reconfigured as shown on the Master
Plan, and 7:1 slopes will be constructed.
Due to the fact that the lake comprises close to 30% of the project area,
we were able to design an excellent Storm Water Management Plan from the
standpoint of drainage and retention. The design incorporates measures to
provide good water quality in the storm runoff. The soil is suitable for
development. From an engineering standpoint, this project is an excellent
parcel of land to develop.
'--
'".
-9-