REVIEW COMMENTS
MEMORANDUM
TO: Sue Kruse, City Clerk
FROM: James J. Golden, Senior City Planner
DATE: March 23, 1990
SUBJECT: Three Applications for Annexation, Land Use Element
Amendment and Rezoning Submitted by Kilday &
Associates, Inc.
Accompanying this memorandum you will find a copy of the above
referenced applications for the following:
1. Service Station
2. Mall Corner Restaurant
3. Retail/Oil-Lube
The above applications are below the threshold for the twice a
year limitation on Comprehensive Plan amendments and do not
require a map advertisement. The annexations will be advertised
for four consecutive weeks prior to second reading of the
ordinances to amend the Future Land Use and Rezone. The
application fees for these applications have been forwarded to
the Finance Department.
Please advertise the land use element and rezoning requests for a
pUblic hearing before the Planning and Zoning Board at the May 8,
1990 meeting and before the City Commission at the May 15, 1990
meeting.
J
/ . };1"-~P~_
JJG:frb
Encs
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM 90-035
TO:
J. Scott Miller, City Manager
Timothy P. Cannon, Interim Planning Director r-C
THRU:
FROM: James J. Golden, Senior City Planner
DATE: February 23, 1990
SUBJECT: Applications (6) Submitted by Kilday and Associates
For Annexation, Land Use Element Amendment and Rezoning
The Planning Department has notified the applicant that the
above-referenced applications are incomplete (see attached
correspondence dated February 13, 1990). Whether the
applications are complete is important, with respect to meeting
the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance,
since only previously approved projects and complete applications
received before February 1, 1990 are exempt from this ordinance.
If the City processes these applications, it is possible that the
City will be challenged by Palm Beach County, insofar as
exemption from the Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance is
concerned. In addition, it appears likely that several of these
applications either separately or when considered together, may
constitute a Development of Regional Impact (DRI).
With respect to the above, the City Commission should consider
requesting a binding letter from DCA regarding DRI status. The
reason for this request is that the site exceeds one of
thresholds set forth in Chapter 380, Florida Statutes for a DRI
(40 acres for retail uses, or 30 acres for office uses).
J;.-I. ~
ES ,. GOLDEN
JJG:frb
Enc
cc: Central File
PM90-035
..
'.
=
't..
en :;;/5
"Z
o
-
f-
0..<(
<(.Q
~ ....J'
c..
Z 0..-
0<(.
<(f= '5 ,. ',:;'1 ! .:.\ ::.;, ;.\\. ~
.. .. . , . ""\' i. t. ";..
.".. .... . I
() i= j / J'~ bk~-;'" .~, ~;-
q <c - ''}:; ;--,~;;"~" '. :~r ~;'-;:j"l N t~:~.
--' 1',. ,.. .'.r:o ,"'- ~
>< Q :. -\ ~ : tl\\ I....~ .,,. '" I Lf ': ' '"
~ I~ - I .., I" I ../ . \ ' .:l: _ , .. I %
\:l ;;. . ~i^.. .1 \ I \ :.... ~ ~ , If
W ~I' ll:: ",' 1 ,r r j f~. "~. .;-..jJ..._....
. ,. .\., J I' I.LJ . .'
"I .'f". '.. I ',' I ~ = CD " .
Z ~. .--.........;-J.....~:- <t' .... / Z::< I ;t
ft"". . _I __ .. . . ~
Z ~,' ~ '-' ~~ ~C.~ r .....'....
,0 :. " ..... : 8 U \ i;t :v.
". <( ~j' ~ " t. ~" ;.~~~. \'.";""
~ l~ :(\;"_\ <~:l"
ll~ . · . ~-~t ~._;;.
"/ ''',) \;: \.... ~
~J~~ _ ~ :~~_ _ ~ "'~")'.' \ I: ~",
o . \- : I. .
-, . 0 .". ..'_
;1. ~:~.. I ~I' oj
, . ~ ~ I' ~
'-!~ '\ 4.l... i
tL.;, " _____ co 'b'~ S3~v, aooM'>NO-.
ItP~ t ~/' \1;::h~IG~l ,,!~ t ~\~'\I~
I !, Ji, t/, f I tE : /51" \,\"'\' i~ _j ~
; ,:""7~:\ ( _ \~ - r ! /-.-,: I.. i~' ) !.'fi;' ,~ '-l
I. . '-, \ - "1'':('\ i . _ . I. .
f. .i
...: :
.(..
I
i.
c
\
l 0 ~I ~
-!.
""
I
,./
. .
...
.,
==11' g
-l -
.,
I
,
:~"
~I
I
N)
.;..., IlJ .
. ~
<;)eD
. "''') ~
"., . 1 ...
"""/u
, 'l(
. '"
......'"
'-'..:
,....,.
~~ .
..
$?~
<:
'. u
I\J/<
Ii
. co..:
.
r
.
~.
I
01 0
.. ...... ..... ......... ... .... .,........~.................~.......
...................... .... -.................. ~.. .... ~.~. ......
O ......lI>. .,'. .... ......... -... ..t.......~..,..... ~.. 'I. .,~... .,..
. ....,........................ ....... .............. .... .......
<t ............................. ......................... .......
O ............ ~................ ,...u.... .......... ......~.. .....
............,..... ........ J.'4:,~."."......"..., ... ..,.......
~ . ........... .,.........:.........l.~....................! .......
:::: ::::: ::::::: ::0.........: ::t: ~:::::::;:: :;:: :::::;::::;
................... U. ,.~...............,...............
...... .... ...~..... .. ~.\.............. ~..... ... i.......
. ..................... .......~........,.......,........~.. .....
...... II......... !",............. .,1..,........ ...... .... ........... ......
......................... ....~ .... ..... ...... ,..... ...........
.... "...... .... ...... I... -,..... ............... ........ ..... I.... II.. ,..... '"
: ::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::C::::::: ::::: ::: j::: :::: ::;::::::.
............ .1........................ ,...... ..'.........~....
'" ................................ ., .....................;.. 0/1 :
(
~
~
(
"~'I
..../
I
...
-
. ;
.
.
t
r'
~
--
Parcel Existing Proposed
Reference Owners Acreage Zoning Zoning
A Bill Ray Winchester
Elsie A. Winchester
Ernest Klatt 49.44 AR C-3
B Bill Ray Winchester
Elsie A. Winchester 0.80 AR C-3
C Mall Corner, Inc.
(c/o Schroeder & Larche) 1.34 AR C-3
D Bill R. Winchester
Elsie Winchester
William A. Zeiher
Michael A. Schroeder 2.44 AR C-3
E Charlene Boynton
Donald Lowe
University of Florida
Foundation, Inc. 14.76 AR PCD
F Winchester Family
Partnership 13.87 AR PCD
Tot a 1: 82.65 ac.
"\
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435.0310
(407) 734.8111
f
OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR
February 13, 1990
Kilday & Associates, Inc.
Attn: Kieran J. Kilday
1551 Forum Place, Bldg. 100A
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Dear Mr. Kilday:
. \
, ~
Please be advised that the Planning Department has reviewed the
six applications submitted on January 31, 1990. Our comments are
as follows:
I.\ ~. Proposed Service Station (.80 acres) at southwest corner of
North Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road owned by Bill
Ray Winchester and Elsie A. Winchester (applications for
annexation, land use element amendment and rezoning).
The following items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
(1) Since the proposed zoning category does not comply wtt~
the text language for Planning Area 7 of the Future
Land Use Element Support Documents, an application for
a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment.
(2) An additional copy of the property owners' list, tax
maps (photocopy acceptable) and affidavit.
(3) The water/sewer impact statement required pursuant to
items 6 and 7 on pages 4 and 5 is based on comparison
of existing and proposed zoning categories and not .
existing and proposed land use categories. The
statement also does not indicate that calculations are
based on the standards adopted by the Palm Beach
County Health Department.
I
I .
TO: Kilday & Assoc
-2-
Feb. 13, 1990
II. Proposed Mall South Parcels (49.52 acres total) located on
the east and west sides of Winchester Park Boulevard
between Old Boynton Road and Boynton Beach Boulevard, owned
by Bill R. Winchester, Elsie A. Winchester, and Ernest
Klatt (applications for annexation, land use element
a~endment and rezoning).
The following items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
(1) Since the proposed zoning category does not comply with
the text language for Planning Area 7.f of the Future
Land Use Element Support Documents, an application for
a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment.
(2) An additional copy of the property owner,'_list, tax
maps (photocopy acceptable) and affidavit.
( 3 )
( 4 )
( 5 )
, .
Pursuant to item c(l) on page 3 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, written consent to ihe
processing of this application from Ernest Klatt.
I . , ,
Pursuant to item d(3) on page 4 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, a tree survey which
meets the requirements of the City of Boynton Beach
Tree Preservation Ordinance.
Pursuant to item h on pages 4, 5, 6 and 7 of the Land
Use Element Amendment/Rezoning application, a compari-
son of the impacts that would be created by develop-
ment under the proposed zoning with the impacts that
would be created by development under the existing
zoning, which shall include:
(a) A comparison of the potential square footage or
number and type of dwelling units under the existing
zoning with that which would be allowed under ~h~
proposed zoning or development.
(b) A statement of the uses that would be allowed in
the proposed zoning or development, and any particular
uses that would be excluded.
(c) Proposed timing and phasing of the development.
(d) A comparison of traffic which would be generated
under the proposed zoning or development, with' the
traffic that would be generated under the current
zoning; also, an analysis of traffic movements at the
intersections of driveways that would serve the
property and surrounding roadways, and improvements I I
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
-3-
Feb. 13, 1990
, .
that would be necessary to accommodate such traffic
movements. For proposed developments which would
generate three-thousand (3,000) vehicle trips per day
or more, or two-hundred fifty (250) or more
single-directional vehicle trips within a one (1) hout
period, a traffic impact analysis shall be required.
Said traffic impact analysis shall include projected
trip generation for the development, for all major
roadways and intersections within one and one-half
(1.5) miles of the subject parcel, as well as traffic
that would utilize local streets through residential
zoning districts. Said traffic impact analysis shall
compare traffic levels between the existing zoning and
the proposed zoning or development of the subject
parcel, and shall take into consideration all
development that would be possible under the current
zoning within the City, adjacent cities, and within the
unincorporated area of Palm Beach County within' a
radius of five (5) miles. For those parc~lslying in
the unincorporated area of Palm Beach County, which are \
not currently zoned for urban land uses, the potential' \
land uses according to the Palm Beach County
comprehensive plan shall be used. Where said parcels
are shown on the Palm Beach County comprehensive plan
under residential land use categories, the midpoint of
the density range shown on the County comprehensive
plan shall be used. Where a county-wide study of
traffic generation at build-out has been adopted or is
utilized by Palm Beach County, the levels of traffic
that are projected by said study shall in all cases be
used to project background traffic in the traffic
impact analysis submitted by the applicant. . The format
and standards used in the traffic impact analysis shall
be the same as those which are required by Palm Beach
County, with the exception of the requirements list;ed
above. Such traffic impact analysis shall include
recommendations for the mitigation of traffic impacts,
consistent with the standards which have been adopted
by or are utilized by Palm Beach County.
(e) For parcels larger than one (1) acre, a comparison
of the water demand for development under the proposed
zoning or development with water demand under the
existing zoning. Water demand shall be estimated using
the standards adopted by the Palm Beach County Health
Department for estimating such demand, unless different
standards are justified by a registered engineer.
Commitment to the provision of improvements to the
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
-4-
Feb. 14, 1990
water system shall also be included, where existing
facilities would be inadequate to serve development
under the proposed zoning.
(f) For parcels larger than one (1) acre, a comparison
I
of sewage flows that would be generated under the
proposed zoning or development with that which would be
generated under the existing zoning. Sewage flows
shall be estimated using the standards adopted by the
Palm Beach County Health Department for estimating such
flows, unless different standards are justified by a
registered engineer. Commitment to the provision of
improvements to the sewage collection system shall also
be included, where the existing facilities would be
inadequate to serve development under the proposed
zoning.
~ '.
(g) For parcels larger than one (1) acre, a comparison
of sewage flows that would be generated under the .
proposed zoning or development with that which would be
generated under the existing zoning. Sewage flows ., \ \
shall be estimated using the standards adopted by the
Palm Beach County Health Department for estimating such
flows, unless different standards are justified by a
registered engineer. Commitment to the provision of
improvements to the sewage collection system shall also
be included, where the existing facilities would be
inadequate to serve development under the proposed
zoning.
(h) For proposed residential developments larger than
one (1) acre, a comparison of the projected population
under the proposed zoning or development with the
projected population under the existing zoning.
Population projections according to age groups for the
proposed development shall be required, where more tha~
fifty (50) dwellings, or 50 sleeping rooms in the case
of group housing, would be allowed under the proposed
zoning. Applications for rezoning to commercial or
industrial zoning districts which exceed one (1) acre
in area shall also provide projections for the number
of employees. I
, I
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
-5-
Feb. 14, 1990
III. Proposed Mall Corner Restaurant (1.34 acres) at the
southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and Winchester Park
Boulevard owned by Mall Corner, Inc. (applications for
annexation, land use element amendment and rezoning).
The following items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
(1) Since the proposed zoning category does not comply with
the text language for Planning Area 7.f of the Future
Land Use Element Documents, an application for a
Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment.
(2) A standard City of Boynton Beach application form for
the Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning application
(the reproduction submitted is not acceptable).
(3) An additional copy of the property owners' list, tax
maps (photocopy acceptable) and affidavit.
(4) Signature of applicant (owner) on page 6 of the
Annexation Application.
(5) Pursuant to item h(l) on page 4 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, the potential square
footage which would be allowed under the proposed
zoning.
, \
. \
\ '.
. (6) Pursuant to item h(8) on page 6 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, projections for the
number of employees.
IV. Proposed Retail/Oil Lube (2.44 acres) at the northeast
corner of West Boynton Beach Boulevard and Winchester Park
Boulevard owned by Winchester, Winchester, Zeiher and
Schroeder, a Florida General Partnership (applications for
annexation, land use element amendment and rezoning).
The following items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
(1) Since a portion of the proposed zoning category does
not comply with the text language for Planning Area 7.f
of the Future Land Use Element Support Documents, an
application for a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment.
(2) An additional copy of the property owners' list, tax
maps (photocopy acceptable) and affidavit.
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
-6-
Feb. 13, 1990
(3) Correct "Proposed Zoning" on page 3 of Annexation
application, as a County land use category has been
indicated instead of the proposed City zoning category.
(4) Pursuant to item h(l) on page 4 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, the potential square
footage which would be allowed under the proposed
zoning.
(5) Pursuant to item h(a) on page 6 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, projections for the
number of employees.
v. Proposed Knuth Road Planned Commercial Development (13.871
acres) at the southwest corner of West Boynton Beach
Boulevard and Knuth Road owned by the Winchester Family
Partnership, Ltd. (applications for annexation, land use
element amendment.and rezoning). I
The fOllowing items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
, \
. \
(1) The correct fee for rezoning to peD is $1,000 pursuant
to the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Fee
Schedule (a check in the amount of $900 was sUbmitted).
(2) Since a portion of the proposed land use and zoning
\ I, categories does not comply with the text language for
Planning Area 7.j of the Future Land Use Element
Support Documents, an application for a Comprehensive
Plan Text Amendment.
(3) An additional copy of the property owners' list, tax
maps (photocopy acceptable) and affidavit.
(4) Signature of applicant is missing from page 6 of
Annexation Application (copy of owner's authorization
signed by Bill R. Winchester).
(5) A tree survey which conforms to the requirements of the
City oflBoynton Beach Tree Preservation Ordinance (see
section 7.5 - 6.l(b) of Article I of the Environmental
Regulations).
(6) Pursuant to item h(l) on page 4 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, the potential square
footage which would be allowed under the proposed
zoning (total for entire PCD).
. J
I
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
-7-
Feb. 13, 1990
(7) Pursuant to item h(8) of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, projections for the
number of employees.
(8) Pursuant to item h(ll) on page 7 of the Land Use
Element Amendment/Rezoning application, conformance
with the requirements for Unified Control outlined in
Section 6.F.3 of Appendix A-Zoning and submittal of a
subdivision master plan pursuant to Article VIII,
Section 4 of Appendix C-Subdivisions, Platting.
VI. Proposed Boynton Beach Boulevard Planned Conmmercia1
Development (14.76 acres) on the south side of West Boynton
Beach Boulevard owned by University of Florida Foundation,
Inc. (applications for annexation, land use e1eme~t
amendment and rezoning).
The following items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
( 1)
( 2)
\ ,
(.3 )
( 4)
( 5)
( 6 )
( 7 )
The correct fee for rezoning to PCD is $1,000 pursuant.
to the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Fee .
Schedule (a check in the amount of $900 was sUbmitted).
I
Since the proposed land use and zoning category does
not comply with the text language for Planning Area 7.k
of the Future Land Use Element Support Documents, an
application for a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment.
An additional copy of the property owners' list, tax
maps (photocopy acceptable) and affidavit.
, \
A tree survey which conforms to the requirements of the
City of Boynton Beach Tree Preservation Ordinance (see
section 7.5 - 6.1 (b) of Article I of the Environmental
Regulations.
I ,
Pursuant to item h(l) on page 4 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, the potential square
footage which would be allowed under the proposed
zoning (total for entire PCD).
Pursuant to item h(8) on page 6 of the Land Use Element
Amendmeht/Rezoning application, projections for the
number of employees.
Pursuant to item h(ll) on page 7 of the Land Use
Element Amendment/Rezoning application, conformance
with the requirements for Unified Control outlined in
. I
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
-8-
Feb. 13, 1990
Section 6.F.3 of Appendix A-Zoning and submittal of a
subdivision master plan pursuant to Article VIII,
Section 4 of Appendix C-Subdivisions, Platting.
(8) Signature of Owner/Trustee is missing from page 7 of
the Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning application.'
Pursuant to Chapter 163.3187 F.S., none of the applications
submitted meet the criteria for small scale development
activities as a result of the text amendments that are necessary
and the fact that an amendment cannot involve the same property
more than once a year or the same owner's property within 200
feet of property granted a change within a period of 12 months.
I
It appears likely that several of these applications, either
separately or when considered together, may constitute_a
Development of Regional Impact (DRI). Therefore, a description
of the petitions, a map showing same, and a tabulation of the
acreages will be forwarded to the City Commission. The
Commission will need to decide whether a binding letter should 'be
requested from DCA regarding DRI status.
, ~
. ,
If the City Commission approves the transmittal of these
applications to DCA, you will be required to submit to the
planning Department, prior to transmittal, a description of the
availability of and demand on public facilities pursuant to
9J-ll.006(1)(b)4 of the Florida Administrative Code.
If 'you have any questions concerning the above, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNT~N~~ACH
r!~~
JAMES J. GOLDEN
Senior City Planner
JJG: frb
cc: City Manager
Central File
Kilday
..': --.
.
.
:?agc 3
II.
SITE DATA
The following information must be filled out below and ~ust
appear, where applicable, on all six (6) copies of the site plan:
1. Land Use Category shown in
the Comprehensive Plan LRC-Local Retail Commercial
2.
3.
Zoninq District
Area of Site
C-3
.80
acres
~c:;/ooo
sq. ft.
4. Land Use -- Acreage Breakdown
a. Residential, including
surrounding lot area or
grounds
acres
% of site
b. Recreation Areas *
(excluding water area)
acres
% of site
d. Corronercial
.80 acres
100
% of site
% of site
% of site
% of site
c. Water Area
acres
e. Industrial
acres
f. Public/Institutional
acres
g. pUblic, private and
Canal rights-of-way
h. other (specify)
acres
% of site
acres
% of site
..
i. other (specify)
acres
% of site
j. Total area of site
.80
acres
100 % of site
* Including open space suitable for outdoor recreation,
and having a minimum dimension of 50 ft.. by 50 ft.
5. Surface Cover
a. Ground floor building 1665 sq. ft.
area (lIbuilding footprint")..
5
% of site,
b.
Water area
sq.ft.
-------% of site
c. Other impervious areas,
including paved area of
public & private streets,
paved area of parking
lots & driveways (ex-
cluding landscaped areas),
and sidewalks, patios,
decks, and athletic
courts. 2C:;,27S' sq.ft.
d. Total impervious area /h,9un sq.ft.
72
% of site.
77
% of site
e. Landscaped area 0
inside of parking lots
(20 sq. ft. per interior
parking space required-
see Sec. 7.5-35(g) of
. .... Landscape Code).
Planning Dept. 1/89
sq. ft.
o
% of site'
_.' ,~:,..: ':~, ot't.: '
,..
'. Page 4
f. other landscaped areas 8ono sq. ft. ')3% 'ls of site
excluding water area ~
g. other pervious areas,
including golf courses,
natural area~, yards, and
swales, but excluding is of site
water areas 0 sq. ft.
h. Total pervious areas Bnfin sq. ft. 23% % of site
i. Total area of site .80 sq. ft. 1nn % of site.
6. Floor Area
a. Residential sq. ft.
b. commercial/Office 1665 sq. ft.
c. Industrial/Warehouse sq. 'ft.
d. Recreational sq. ft.
e. Public/Institutional sq. ft.
f. 'other (specify) sq. ft.
g. Other (specify)
sq. ft.
... h. Total floor area 1665 sq. ft.
,
7. Number of Residential Dwellinq Uni.ts
a. Single-family detached dwelling units
b. Duplex dwelling units
c. Multi-Family (3 +
attached dwelling units)
(1 ) Efficiency dwelling units
(2 ) 1 Bedroom dwelling units
( 3 ) 2 Bedroom dwelling units
( 4) 3+ Bedroom d.welling units
d. Total mUlti-family dwelling units
e. Total number of dwelling units
8'-
9.
Gross. Density
dwelling units per acre
Maximum height of structures on site 30
feet
1
stories
10. Required off-street parking
.a; Calculation of required
number of off-street
parking spaces
b. Off-street parking spaces.
provided on site plan
.1
1sp/250 S.F.= 5 sp
8 spaces
Planning'Dept. 1/89
. .
..'
Page 5
III. SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS
The fOllowing materials are to be submitted in six (6)
copies. Each set of plans must be stapled togethe= in
a single package. Scale of drawings must be 200 ft.
(or less) to the inch. Incomplete site plans will not
be processed.
(check)
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
N/A
xx
xx
N/A
N/A
xx
N/A
N/A
xx
xx
xx
1. Boundaries and dimensions of the parcel.
. .
2. Scale, graphic scale, north arrow, and date.
3. Adjacent properties or land uses.
4. Pavement edge and/or right-of-way lines for all
streets, alleys, sidewalks, turn lanes, driveways
and unimproved rights-of-way within one-hundred
(100) feet of the site. Also, names of adjacent
streets and rights-of-way.
5. Location of all proposed structures, and any I
existing structures that are to remain on the
site.
6. Setbacks of all structures (over 3 ft. in,height)
from property lines.
7. Use of each structure, ~ndicated on the site pl~n.
8. Number of efficiency, 1-bedroom, 2 bedroom, etc.,
dwelling units in each residential structure, to
be indicated on site plan.
9. Indication of height and number of stories'of
each structure.
~
10. Indication of structures, equipment, etc. above
45 ft. height, including height in excess of
45 ft.
11. Floor plans or typical floor plans for all
structures.
12. Finish floor elevations of all structures.
13. Uses within each structure, indicated on floor
plans.
14. Elevations or typical elevations of all structures;
including materials, surface treatments, and color
scheme of all exterior surfaces, including roofs.
15. Indication of the numbers and types of recreational
facilities to be provided for residential
developments.
16. Indication on site plan of location, orientation, and
height of all freestanding signs and wall. signs.~
17. Location of walls and fences, and indication of their
height, materials, and color.
18. A landscape plan, showing conformance with the
Landscape Code and Tree Preservation Code, and
showing adequate watering facilities. Plants
must be keyed out according to species, size
and quantity. .
Planning Dept. 1/89
.
~
.,..,...,.".:..:.;....'.,:
. ,
Page .6
XX 19. A sealed survey, by a surveyor registered in the
State of Florida and not older than six (6)
months, showing property lines, including be~~i~gs
and dimensions; north arrow, date, sca~e, ex~s~ing
s~ructures and paving, existing elevat~ons.on
s~te, rights-of-way and easements on or adJace~t
to the site, utilities on or adjacent to the s~te,
legal description, acreage to the nearest one-
hundredth (1/100) of an acre, location sketch, and
surveyor's certification. Also) sizes and locations J'.
of existing tree and shrubs', including common and
botanical names, and indication as to which are to
be retained, removed, relocated, or replaced.
NIA 20. Location of existing utility lines on adjacent
tp the property to 'be indicated on the site plan,
in addition to being shown on the survey. Also,
location of existing fire hydrants on or adjacentl
to the site.
N/A 21. Location of additional fire hydrants, to meet standards.
set forth in Article X, Section 16 of the Subdivision
and Platting Regulations.
N/A 22. Fire flow calculations justifying line size for
both on/off site water lines.
N/A 23. Sealed engineering drawings for proposed utilities,
as per City specifications.
: .
XX 24. Information regarding form of ownership (condo-
minium, fee simple, lease, etc.).
xx 25. Location and orientation of garbage cans or
dumpster facilities: All garbage dumpsters must be
so located to provide direct access for the city
front-end loaders, and the dumpster area must be .
provided with adequate width and height clearance.
The site must be so designed to eliminate the necessity
for the front-end loader to back into any street. If .
any use requires the disposal of wet'garbage~ a.ten .
foot by ten foot (10' x 10') concrete slab shall be~.
provided. All dumpsters must be screened and
landscaped in accordance with the City Landscape Code..
(See Sec. 7.5-s5 (i). A minimum 10. foot wide opening
is required for dumpster enclosures.
xx
26. A parking lot design and construction plan showing
conformance to the City Parki~g Lot Regulations,
and including the following information. Any .
exceptions to the Parking Lot regulations that are
proposed or that are to continue will require an
application for Varia~ce to the Parking Lot
Regulations. .
a. Location of all parking and loading facilities.
b. A parking lot layout plan, inclUding curbs,
car stops,. and double striping. .
~ .
c. A cross-section of materials to be used in the
construction of the parking lot.
d. A lighting plan for the building exterior and
site, including exterior security lighting, .
and lighting for driveways and parking lots;
to include the location of lighting standards,
direction of lighting, fixture types, lamp
types and sizes, and average illumination
level(s) in footcandles.
~
Planning Dept. 1/89
On-site traffic plan, including arrows and
other pavement markings, traffic signs, and
stop signs at exits.
Location of handicap parking spaces, plus
signs and access ramps, consistent with the
State Handicap Code.
A drainage plan for the entire site, including
parking areas; to include finish grade and
pavement elevations, drainage calculations, and
details of the drainage system. If the
total impervious area on site exceeds
twenty-five thousand (25,000) square feet,
then drainage plans and calculations must be
prepared by an engineer registered in the
state of Florida, and must be sealed. 1
Percolation tests must be provided with
drainage calculations.
Existing elevations on adjacent properties,
and on adjacent rights-of-way.
N/A 27. In addition to the above requirements, the following
items shall be submitted to the Planning Department
no later than the date of the Community Appearance
Board deadline: .
I
a. One copy of colored elevations for all
buildings and signage to be constructed on site.
These elevations must be of all sides of each
type of building and signage proposed and the
colors proposed must be accompanied by a
numerical code from an established chart
of colors. Elevations must also include
information related to building~materials.
All elevations must be submi.tted on 24" x 36"
drawings. Buildings constructed will be
inspected on the basis of the elevations
submitted to the city and approved by the City
Commission. Failure to construct buildings
consistent with elevations submitted will
result in the Certificate of Occupancy being
withheld.
4
Planning Dept. 1/89
. ......v;',.,..,...'
?age 7
e. Information Showing conformance with the City
street and sidewalk Ordinance, including
construction of sidewalks along adjacent
public streets.
Location of existing and proposed pUblic and
private streets, inclUding ultimate rights-of-
way.
f.
g.
h.
i.
j .
A transparency of the site plan (maximum size
of 8-1/2" x 1111). At the discretion of the
applicant, the Planning Department will prepare
transparencies from the site plan document.
However, the Planning Department will not be
responsible for poor quality transparencies
which result from the submission of poor qual~ty
site plan blueprints, and poor quality I
transparencies will not be presented to the
Planning and zoning Board or City Commission.
c. Colored photographs of surrounding buildings
(minimum size 8" x lO").
b.
. I
I
j' ,
, .
"
......, -. .~.. ..... ..- ;.......'
~ -,
Page 8
N/A 28. Any other engineering and/or technical data, as
may be required by the Technical Review Board to
determine compliance with the provisions of t~e,
City's Code of Ordinances.
Any of the above requirements may be waived by the
Technical Review Board, if such information is
deemed to be nonessential by the Board.
..
Planning Dept. 1/89
TRAFFIC STATEMENT
PROPOSED SERVICE STATION
OLD BOYNTON ROAD & CONGRESS AVENUE
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 29, 1990
Prepared By:
K.S. ROGERS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC.
1495 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite F
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
(407) 964-7300
(FAX) 969-9717
!:u 1;;
;;-f
FIGURE
FIGURE
FIGURE
FIGURE
LIST OF FIGURES
1
2
3
4
LOCATION MAP
EXISTING ROADWAY
CONDITIONS
DISTRIBUTED TRAFFIC
PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
INTRODUCTION
This office has been retained to prepare a Traffic Impact
Analysis for a proposed 1,104 square foot food mart / self-serv-
ice gasoline station. This facility is proposed to be located on
a 0.8 acre tract on the southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and
Congress Avenue, in Boynton Beach, Florida.
This Analysis has been performed in order to determine the
volume of traffic expected to be generated by this project at
such time that this project is completely constructed and com-
pletely occupied, the effect that the generated traffic will have
on the area's roadways and to make recommendations on what road-
way improvements, if any, are necessary as a resul t of the ap-
proval of this pro ject. In addition, in conformance with the
policy of the City's Planning Staff, this Analysis has been
performed in accordance with the standards and criteria as estab-
lished in both the City's Zoning Code and the technical standards
of the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance
#87-18.
Existing traffic counts which were available from the Metro-
politan Planning Organization and the Palm Beach County Traffic
Division were used, when applicable, and these counts were aug-
mented by twenty-four (24) hour machine counts performed by this
office.
SITE INFORMATION
As shown in Figure 1, this parcel is located on the south-
west corner of Old Boynton Road and Congress Avenue.
IlltllAkl AI.....OC;....."MtCS Jl2't40
11.
ss-/
3^'"
w
>
<(
o
z
C\l
C\l
~
z
lIVl::l.L
k. s. rogers, consulting
engineer, inc.
west palm beach, fl
"
"
o
>
....J
lD
o
<(
o
a:
I-
U
<(
W
lD
r8):~
t,:;:;.
UJ
.-
UJ
z
o
I-
;: Ol::l H.LnN>l
o
lD
o
....J
o
z
o
I-
Z
>-
o
lD
w
>
<(
w
>
<(
I-
I-
ll)
o
a:
CO)
C\l
~
en
w
en
SS3l::l~NO~
Al::lV .L111~
LOCATION MAP
date
JAN 90
figure
1
The Site Plan as prepared by Kilday & Associates, shows a
1,104 square foot food mart, self-service gasoline station and
an accessory car wash. The Site Plan indicates that there will be
five (S) parking spaces provided on-site. There will be one
driveway providing access to this site onto both Old Boynton Road
and Congress Avenue.
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS
The major roads serving as access to this site are Old
Boynton Road and Congress Avenue. Old Boynton Road is an east -
west arterial roadway in the immediate area of the project. Old
Boynton Road exists as a five (S) lane roadway west of the site
from Congress Avenue to Knuth Road. East of Congress Avenue, Old
Boynton Road is a two (2) lane roadway.
Congress Avenue, the other major road serving as direct
access to this site, is a four (4) lane divided north - south
arterial roadway. The section of Congress Avenue, from N.W. 22nd
Avenue to Boynton Beach Boulevard, is scheduled to be widened to
a six (6) lane roadway by the developer of the Palm Isle PUD.
The widening is expected to commence during 1991.
Figure 2 shows the existing average annual daily volumes and
roadway capacities for these roadway segments as they presently
exist.
GENERATION
The generation rate for this project was determined based
upon generation rate information published in "Trip Generation -
Fourth Edition", Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1987 and
from an in-house generation study performed for unattended acces-
sory car washes.
-2-
Aft."It.f AtPAor,AAPIo4H.'!> ",'101'1
11.
S6-/
3^V
W
>
c(
o
Z
N
N
~
Z
llVell
k s. rogers, consulting
. .
engineer, inc.
west 001,." beach, fl
..
"
alO
00
alO
13>0
C\l(")
o
>
-I
co
o
<(
o
a:
allO
00
alO
13>0
C\/(")
J:
o
<(
W
co
~Iiz ~I)3 ~
o -
I- C/)
; Gel H.LnN>I
o
m ~Ig
(")....
....(")
.... ....
100
(")0
CD..,.
....CD
C\/..,.
1010
(")0
CD..,.
....CD
C\l""
o
-I
o
z
o
I-
Z
>-
o
m
W
>
c(
W
>
c(
J:
I-
10
o
a:
(")
C\l
010
....0
......,.
10 CD
C\l'lt
~
Cf)
W
Cf)
SS3Cl8NO:::>
AClV IlllV\l
W
~
0::)
--I
::::0
<(>
:= o.
-10
00.
a z rCf)
Z j:: Cf) 0
W Cf)W-I
_a:
<!) x J: I-
W WI-<
...J
(")10
coo
(").-
....(")
.... .-
EXISTING ROAD CONDITIONS
dote
JAN 90
figure
2
The project generation can be calculated as follows:
USE
GENERATION
RATE
GENERATION
GASOLINE STATION
1104 Sq. Ft. FOOD MART
561 Sq. Ft. CAR WASH
748 tpd/site
886 tpd/lOOO sf
166 tpd/site
748 tpd
400 tpd (1)
166 tpd
(1) Assumed 50% of food mart customers
purchase gasoline.
It is recognized that not all traffic attracted to commer-
cial projects is additional traffic on the roadway system. A
considerable portion of commercial traffic, dependent upon the
land use, is captured from the passing stream of traffic. This
pass-by traffic is also addressed in "Trip Generation". Based
upon the pass-by traffic criteria in "Trip Generation", the
actual amount of additional traffic can be calculated as follows:
PASS-BY ADDITIONAL
GENERATION PASS-BY TRAFFIC TRAFFIC
USE Itt29.l % (tpd) (tpd)
GASOLINE STATION 748 58% 434 314
FOOD MART 490 45% 220 270
CAR WASH ~ 0% ~ 166
TOTAL 1404 654 750
The total, average daily traffic calculated for this project
at full buildout and 100% occupancy is 750 trips per day.
The Traffic Impact Fee for this project was calculated to be
Twenty Thousand, Six Hundred Twenty-Five Dollars ($20,625.00), based
upon an Impact Fee Rate of $ 2 7 . 50 per tr ip, as determined from
Ordinance #89-19.
-3-
DISTRIBUTION
The distribution analysis used in this Report was prepared
based upon an analysis of the existing and proposed land uses and
of observed travel patterns. The following distributional splits
have been calculated for this Report:
NORTH 37%
EAST 12%
SOUTH 37%
WEST 14%
The distributed traffic volumes are shown in Figure 3. In
accordance with the Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance, the
distributed traffic was brought two miles from the site, or until
the project generated less than 1% of the capacity 'of the roadway
(Insignificant Volume).
CONFORMANCE WITH TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ORDINANCE
The Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance defines all
projects either as a "Significant Project" or as an "Insignifi-
cant Project". An "Insignificant Project" is defined as a
project which has an "Insignificant Effect" or generates less
than one percent (1%) of the threshold capacity at Level of Serv-
ice "D" on the thoroughfares directly accessed by the project.
This project directly accesses onto Old Boynton Road, a {~ve
(5) lane roadway with a threshold capacity at Level of Service
"D" of 30,000 and Congress Avenue, a four (4) lane divided road-
way with a threshold capacity at Level of Service "D" of 30,000
tr ips per day. One percent (1%) of the threshold capaci T-Y at
Level of Service "D" for Old Boynton ROi'ld Cino Conqress Avenue is
300 trips per day.
-4-
R!LIABlE 'U!:PROOftA,NtCl Jll'40
11.
S6-1
3^V
UJ
>
<(
o
z
(\/
(\/
:;:
Z
llVl::ll
k. s. rogers, consulting
. .
engineer, Inc.
west palm beach, fl.
...
'"
*
(1)10
100
C\le?
*
(1)10
C\l0
...-e?
o
>
..J
co
o
<(
o
a:
* :I:
Olio (.)
10 0 <(
C\le? UJ
co
t':'.~.:ot
~)
I-
Z
>-
o
co
Ol::l HlnN>4
*
~I~
...- ...-
o
..J
o
z
o
I-
Z
>-
o
co
UJ
>
<(
UJ
>
<(
:I:
I-
10
o
a:
e?
N
:;:
en
UJ
en
SS31:WNO::>
Al::lV llll~
DISTRIBUTED TRAFFIC
I-
UJ (.)
~~ ~
\L..J :E
\LO
<(> I-
a: Z
1-0. <(
..J 0 "
I- O. ....,
(.)J:en!t
wenoz
c"W C)
Oa:..J-
~a:J:l-en
(!)Q..I-<(z
w
..J (1)1....
...-C') *
...- ...-
date
JAN 90
figure
3
From Figure 3, it is concluded that this project creates an
insignificant effect on all of the major roads in the immediate
project area. In addition, this
"Insignificant Project" according
Standards Ordinance #87-18.
project
to the
is classified as an
Traffic Performance
According to Ordinance #87-18, an "Insignificant Project"
may be approved if two conditions are met:
1. The existing V/C.Ratio on the directly
accessed link does not exceed 1.5; and
2. If the VIC Ratio exceeds 1.0, then a fee,
in addition to the Fair Share Contribution
for Road Improvements Fee (Road Impact Fee),
shall be paid in accordance with TABLE 3, of
the Ordinance.
As shown in Figure 3, the eXisting V/C ratios for both Old
Boynton Road and Congress Avenue are less than 1.0. Thus, both
conditions of approval are met and no Insignificant Project Fee
is required.
PEAK HOUR
The peak hour volumes generated by this project were calcu-
lated in order to determine what site related improvements, if
any, will be required. The peak hour volumes were based upon the
generation rates published in "Trip Generation". The peak hour
generation rates used are:
Food Mart
Service Station
Car Wash
- 75.5
- 6.0%
- 6.0%
trips/1000 s.f.
of the ADT
of the ADT
-5-
The peak volumes are calculated below:
Food Mart
Service Station
Car Wash
TOTAL
1,104 sq.ft. x 75.5 trips/lOOO sf
6.0% of 748
6.0% of 166
= 83 trips
= 45 trips
= 10 tr~
138 TRIPS
The peak hour directional splits are:
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME IN OUT
TRIPS (TRIPS) (TRIPS)
FOOD MART 83 42 41
SERVICE STATION 45 23 22
CAR WASH --.lQ -2 _..2
TOTAL 138 70 68
These peak hour volumes are shown in Figure 4.
Based upon a review of these peak hour turning volumes, it
is concluded that no additional turn lanes are necessary as a
result of the approval of this Petition.
CONCLUSION
This proposed 1,104 square foot Food Marti Self Service
Gasoline Station is expected to generate an average of 750 trips
per day at the project's driveway.
This project is classified as being an "Insignificant
Project" . As the V IC Ratios on Old Boynton Road and Congre;ss
Avenue do not exceed 1.0, this project can be approved in accord-
ance wi th the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards
Ordinance #87-18.
-6-
,.
0
a:
3^," I a~, ( I SS3~~NO~
I 0
.
I
I
I
I
I w
I ....
I (f)
- I
. ,'-as
" ,6~
I(
1-
- w
zl ::t
0 L_________J ::>
... ...J
Z 0
>- >
0 a:
m ::>
a 0
z :I:
w :.::
C) c(
w W
...J Q.
0
...J
0
- ,
30NV"~N3 -
11VW C^'S )4H't'd H31.S3H~NIM \.
J1 . ,
k. s. rogers, consulting date
engineer, inc. PEAK HOUR VOLUMES JAN 90
west palm beach, fl. figure
... 4
IIIIL1-A.U IIII..-04MtAPttICI 312"'0