AGENDA DOCUMENTS
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Requested City Commission
Meeting Dates
o July 21,1998
o August 4, 1998
o August 18, 1998
o September I, 1998
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to City Clerk's Office
July 10, 1998 (noon)
Requested City Commission
Meeting Dates
o September 15,1998
o October 6, 1998
[8J October 20, 1998
o November 3, 1998
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to City Clerk's Office
September 4. 1998 (noon)
July 24. 1998 (noon)
September 25. 1998 (noon)
August 7,1998 (noon)
October 9, 1998 (noon)
August2L 1998 (noon)
October 23, 1998 (noon)
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
o Administrative
[8J Consent Agenda
o Public Hearing
o Bids
o Announcement
o Development Plans
o New Business
o
o
o
Legal
Unfmished Business
Presentation
RECOMMENDATION: Please place the request below on the October 20, 1998 City Commission meeting agenda under
Consent - Ratification of Planning and Development Board Action. The Planning and Development Board, with a 7-0 vote.
recommended approval subject to staff comments. For further details pertaining to the request, see attached Development
Department Memorandum No. PZ 98-286.
EXPLANATION:
PROJECT: St. Joseph's Episcopal Church and School
AGENT: Jerome F. Milord
LOCATION: 3300 S. Seacrest Boulevard
DESCRIPTION: Request for conditional use approval to construct the addition of a 4,543 square foot youth center in the
northwest comer of the campus.
PROGRAM IMPACT: N/ A
FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
ALTERNATIVES: N/ A
,-{(ut :/'Jp;;;da i Lie-
Department of Development Director's Signature
City Manager's Signature
f /f __ --:>
,FL........ C -t-. /~____
Acting Managerftf Pfanning and Zoning
City Attorney / Finance / Human Resources
'TH\.\IAIN\SHRDA T AIPLANNlNGISHAREDlWP\PROlECTSIST.JOSEPHS EPISCOPAL CHURCH\COUSIAGENDA ITEM REQUEST FOR lO-20-Q8.DOC
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 98-286
FROM:
Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
~~
Michael Rumpf
Acting Manager of Planning and Zoning
~&
Scott Barber -
Senior Planner (Gee and Jensen)
TO:
THROUGH:
DATE:
October 1, 1998
SUBJECT:
St. Joseph's Episcopal Church - COUS 97-002
Conditional Use - Day care facility for use by the existing church
PROPOSAL SUMMARY
Contained herein is a description of the subject project. The St. Joseph's Episcopal Church campus,
situated on 14.68 acres, is comprised of 60,505 square feet of building area which includes the church,
school, residence hall and other support buildings. The plans submitted for this conditional use approval
propose the addition of a 4,543 square foot youth and day care center, to be used by the church, in the
north west comer of the parcel. The additional building will raise the parcel's building coverage to 0.10
percent, and does not reflect a change in use, function, or performance of the overall use of the site as
measured by the city's land development regulations.
Applicant!
Agent:
Jerome F. Milord, Milord Company
Project name:
St. Joseph's Episcopal Church - new youth/day care center
General description: Conditional use approval for the addition of a youth/day care facility
Property size:
14.68 acres (total)
Land use:
Public I Private, Govemmer~, Institution (PPGI)
Zoning:
R-1-AAB, Single family residential, (the R-1-AAB zoning district permits school
facilities as a conditional use, and the code was recently revised to allow day care
as conditional uses in churches).
Location:
West side of.S. Seacrest Boulevard, east side of S. Swinton Avenue, and south of
Mission Hill Road.
Number of Units:
N/A
I
----...---.-.------.....----.-..-.----,---
St. Joseph's Episcopal Church
Memorandum No. PZ 98-286
Page 2
. Building area:
65,048 square feet broken down into 13 buildings including the proposed, 4,543
square foot day care center, and existing classrooms, church facilities,
administration buildings and a 2,000 square foot residence hall (eXCluding that
area occupied by mechanical equipment, and other non-livable space). (See
Exhibit "B" - Proposed Plan).
Site development
history:
1979 - Original church, Fellowship Hall and School
1988 - Classroom expansion, Residence Hall
1994 - Gymnasium and classroom expansion
1996 - New library, Arts building, additional sports fields
SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
North - Mission Hill subdivision (single family homes), zoned R-1-AAB
East - Gulf Stream Estates (single family homes), zoned R-1-AAB
South - Hills At Lake Eden, zoned PUD
West - Lake Eden subdivision (single family homes), zoned R-1-AAB
STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING CONDITIONAL USES AND ANALYSIS
Section 11.2.0 of the Land Development Regulations contains the following standards to which
conditional uses are required to conform. Following each of these standards is the Planning and Zoning
Division's evaluation of the application as it pertains to standards.
The Planning and Development Board and City Commission shall consider only such conditional uses as
are authorized under the terms of these zonihg regulations and, in connection therewith, may grant
conditional uses absolutely or conditioned upon the conditions including, but not limited to, the dedication
of property for streets, alleys, recreation space and sidewalks, as shall be determined necessary for the
protection of the surrounding area and the citizens' general welfare, or deny conditional uses when not in
harmony with the intent and purpose of this section. In evaluating an application for conditional use, the
Board and Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed use on the general health, safety and
welfare of the community and make written findings certifying that satisfactory provisions have been
made concerning the following standards, where applicable:
1. Ingress and egress to the subject property and proposed structures thereon, with particular
reference to automobile and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and
access in case of fire or catastrophe.
The subject property has one point of ingress/egress located on Swinton Avenue at the northwest
comer of the site and a second ingress/egress located on S. Seacrest Boulevard. The driveways
lead to a main parking facility which sefYices the majority of the existing buildings. To address
objections raised by any of the reviewing agencip.s" the applicant has agreed to alterations which
adequately satisfy said comments.
2. Off-street parking and loading areas where required, with particular attention to the items in
subsection 1 above, and the economic, glare, noise, and odor effects the conditional use will
~
St. Joseph's Episcopal Church
Memorandum No. PZ 98-286
Page 3
have on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole.
A 1988 shared parking study was modified in 1994 to allow the approval of the gymnasium and
classroom expansion. At that time Palm Beach County Traffic Division limited the number of
students to 225. The number of parking spaces required by the sI'Jared parking study is 133
spaces. The latest proposed project will provide 180 spaces, including the nine (9) parking
spaces required for the additional building. No loading areas are required or proposed for the
new day care building. The new structure and its related parking will contribute minimally to the
glare, noise or odor created by the church facility.
3. Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the items in subsection 1 and 2 above.
The refuse and service areas arl? to be combined and located in front of building 9 at the center of
the site (a location nearest to the gymnasium facility). Staff is satisfied with the current location
and accessibility of the dumpster enclosure, as shown on the subject plan.
4. Utilities, with reference to locations, availability, and compatibility.
With incorporation of Utility Department comments, utilities are available and consistent with
Comprehensive Plan policies and city regulations.
5. Screening, buffering and landscaping with reference to type, dimensions, and character.
With incorporation of Planning and Zoning Division comments, screening and buffering of
adjoining properties will meet code.
6. Signs, and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to glare, traffic safety, economic effect, and
compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties.
At the time of permitting, the parking lot light levels will be evaluated for traffic safety and
excessive glare. Considering that most of the parking areas are shielded by project buildings or
expansive open space, no increased conditions regarding glare are anticipated from the
proposed parking area. It is recommended that the site lighting poles not exceed 20 feet in height
and that the light levels not exceed minimum standards to maintain residential character. It is
further recommended that the light fixtures required to illuminate the entrance access aisle be
directed away from the residential buildings located north and west of the site. No additional
sign age will be proposed.
7. Required setbacks and other open spaces.
Setback and overall landscape code requirements will be met when staff comments are
incorporated into permit drawings.
8. General compatibility with adjacent property, and other property in the zoning district.
The height of the building as proposed is in scale with the single family, one-story homes that
exist directly north and west of the .'Jroposed building. As indicated below under Item #9, with
adherence to the condition relative to height, the project wiIJ maintain compatibility with adjacent
residential dwellings.
3
-- --------~
St. Joseph's Episcopal Church
Memorandum No. PZ 98-286
Page 4
. 9. Height of building and structures, with reference to compatibility and harmony to adjacent and
nearby properties, and the city as a whole.
The overall height of the proposed structure is 18 feet (one story). The maximum height allowed
in the R-1 AAB zoning district is 25 feet, and the adjacent residential buildings have an overall
height of approximately 15 feet.
10. Economic effects on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole.
The proposed day care center and related church facilities are available to members and should
be an economic asset to it's users. The property has been platted and the project is vested for
concurrency.
11. Conformance to the standards and requirements which apply to site plans, as set forth in Chapter
19, Article II of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. (Part III Chapter 4 Site Plan
Review).
With incorporation of staff comments, the proposed project will comply with all requirements of
applicable sections of city code.
12. Compliance with, and abatement of nuisances and hazards in accordance with the performance
standards within Section 4 of the zoning regulations; also, conformance to the City of Boynton
Beach Noise Control Ordinance.
With incorporation of all conditions contained herein, the use would operate in a manner that is in
compliance with the above-referenced codes and ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach.
RECOMMENDATION
Based, in part on the need for this facility as represented by the efforts of the current petitioners, the
vested status of this project, and the consistency with the Comprehensive Plan which allows such uses
within this land use classification contingent upon compatibility with neighborhood character, staff
recommends that this project be approved. This recommendation for approval is conditioned upon
satisfying all conditions of approval as contained in Exhibit "C".
Furthermore, pursuant to Chapter 2 - Zoning, Section 11.2 Conditional Uses, a time limit is to be set
within which the proposed project is to be developed. Staff recommends that a period of one (1) year be
allowed to develop this project. As long as 25% or more of the total cost of the improvements are
completed within one (1) year, this condition is met.
SB
Attachments
S:\Plannl1lQISHARED\\NP\PROJECTS\Sl Joa.'s\CoUS\S\atf R~ COUS9a-002.dce
1
'~\~'~I q IU~-. -". pwc, r</~---J ~, ....- ~
~IJtfi' 'I~~~V _/ .#1,~ili'~:: L~':6 T~' ;YL)r '. " I I.t:~
" .JlD . "- , '~ w ~. h.1..I'Lr- I' L11l.lII I ,(-;iT, ~
"1,~,....frT... il EB t.. 111/'Zr.tlIJ~.;.1 L i~
H -~~ J " , ,~. , T-'"iJ flf'll..;.L. 1.1 11-'1
. I .--+~J 1 _. R. J J ' I l -1, '.; .;: - :11 I.
~ : \ ,11.' !He . '; i i - i ;
'~"1" J/ C':;!I~ R."; ..-;....: .'~ .~- PI-r. L '/ I I 11 'I ;'(~R
u. j '~'/ E. ,... .tjj, -Il ~ -" ~ I I . []]I .~'J--.,
. I J I{...... C ~~ ,... t t "'{.f y, ~ T 1:1""
I. Ill]. -7+81 l/$/iiie::id:')iJ "':' '::"1,1_ ; "mtJ J;l fer-
, I!'~~!d .,. :1' fjpri~Ii~L ~ ~ ?&~, I+:':;~, it r m
.- I :...j (~ ,.!f.... .~. -.t ~ ri;": t- ~11t::J./~ 1IIIml ,L...-.
. rg IT '~'-j(. r . 01 I~"'" rr t,' Ill: I
. 11: 'IJ .... TT ~_ _ 1'- f-- , /.....I-lf [ , ,
"'-'~~:.) I/. ~. '~L....... Illr .lJ.....1..... ..H'jj ; ,__
' r J I..,.. I I I! I I I I '"tt.. '-'-' .:....J .
. . - ~ !f I ,', t- - 11-t I I t I low. . r I ! r-.....; I I .: I II".
& :-/ E ed.'< ,,,I I tL t:......U I LrrT 0,. '.
,', ;1 (J. c: ~Z/':>-... 'V 'n ~.( ~ 1 +-t'r"'""t-' LIT .: .....~_
~, ',: ,'ll ",\ ~ li/,L~' :- - ~crf. II ~ 1 [] ..l.. --1):c:'!i!!:#fm
~. !,j, f- ~ ..,...... f -~ iT) ., ~ __ ~
' I, 1-, 1-. j j ,., c q
\ - . ,
. , '''' ' I I-Ij_l . j - I ' 'E
. I/I~/ I \ ! :u........-.., ~ . 1 I ____.. .
:~' C \.. I I ; I .' i. 'I'"
· : /1 r:--- ffn"fT"G' cl.- ! :! t'..1 :" .~_
'; /0.,'" 11, n,~~~~-:r --: ~cm
~A/I; ',' i~~ IfflIr[;:IT_, '" ".Jl-:fr \h~j:Ri;j ~~ /
/i~~/! //. /t~'1\ \5";l~-iJl -; J ":11- : m,i . - .. -"NIC!
I ' ! .. ,( '.\ 8- Till-1 J . L .. NOT t' c: 3
,,'. //. .I:~~), <f~Tml."i..... f--S'ITE l ~..~ iii CII~ yj i ..I /
;.. /1 --., L ."11 I' 1 'J jj
I." J,,~~ ~ (JJ. J t' ~1I 'I,' ~l 'I ' ' IJ ';-7.; .,~ .
t' '7:!';"~':; ,'-1'1'rIi'\~r I I I '~ i 1I U =tlWlillILJJ},L - ~ Ir .
/(1', ,. t~: /f!::., ,r:~~' ~, . ~'.l,ll, ~"fJ :" ~lliU,i,ll~8~ /1 (; """""/;j \;',11~:
. .', t-. - L ' [1 I l. '; . . .' .
' , . 'I .
! . \ \ ,. - - -1/ :~. '\
!' -\\ ..I, .fJ'9- ";'..' ;:~, ;j _, :. / I ,\.
, '\~':~f) ~~":;i' LLUl1" ' , ! ';' I ~ll, \
I 6\! [%_C~ \:.~ Jr'1 II, I! ~ ,VI1'~, 1~~~/ 'II "Af!,,:'
I ,/ ~orn-~JUV' \1) '\fl _r!T~~r!:~~! ,_ ,I:
,n, ;9l" 1 I tuj J,..f~D~r-~~.1f~ ~f~ ~~?/~rrTL~5-~:' /1-i,1 - T ,- ."1'
jL~ ~ .'1"7 ~-+-lrL1:: TIJI_ .-- l;~ .u..: ,/_
~, f ~ .' r I. I 1ITT- ~~..~~: ~.I~:~ n :'.:/, , '
'-____--L- 1 t t- - . J. - j - .---= ~ :. ---,1: J I I
NOTE
'0 1/8 MILES
''':T~ T IIII I, '
J '0 400.800 FEE~
eXHIBiT HA" _..
LOCATION MAP
ST JOSEPH'S SCHOOL
!N<
!}FU I ~
~fd..~
:iJHfi
I..r....
..f!~h
filisJ
lllm
diu!
j~iHf
nuJ
fl.! ~ ~
_~il~
)1.&,....
iitff
;[iff
nUl
li!i!
i.-h.e
~
--.-........
Iii ~~0$0 0 0 0~~~10 0 i u~ ~~. ,I
vv I (.111 n I.ltlll:ll I n II ~i.m II LL~.~~-'r - ;; \
I I - Jr!::::; . - i l:_ ' I _Ii
I .::.:....... I 17111 II ~ I 11111 r :~ .~ III lib: I C ~~
....' l' " . . . Qf b. .. \
H ':"" l I !IiIl1:E~ I 'F. qlJl . - ':.-. l 0 .( I ~l'~ ~ 1.
. . :=:J:J ~ . 1 I ". . I
I . ~Lmt' (~ ~ l' -u ': .].. ~: 9 ~....~~\:..:. \
. r.) ~?f ~- J ~ ~ =-.J Tfi IJ '
lat . -' ii _... .,;......r- _ ~~~ .....,) ~
~ - I ~ -4 (@ - - E0 c:: '1*" ,,: ~ · :5
- ..L' L. I II k 1- : _- C\... ,r~./ /. ~J :
~ I I. ,/.... :--. + - l~. c:n;y _ 0" .0>: .;1" . /.
~ 11. - . .;f'.} 1 r"" "'-::;.....-...- ~ '~ N(
'" ., ~ " U l:jiJ ii. Q (::>)~ ~~~0 G -0 <:)
f-;, tr::.,:, ';\\\\\\\)~l\~/~ j~. rr 'I
~~ ///.#/i//I,'JftiJj, 1'~ :t
I olJ.. . VW/jlll,r;'rll ',10 =
r I l-;f' ~~\\~'l\"1 ~ ~ ~
~ . . ~
~i r'H":: ~ ~
L 1 q. n il~ · s ~-:
~- <[3.;.- ....- ~ ·
G I ~ \ nl ~ : .:
! . \:J\ ,.J c:83J ;.. ~
~ _---:r~, CEED :E
· i I " 1::
, , 1 " . ~
I I I",
\\1 n 't" -
It I ~ FEEn ~ ~ .
.~ /- lit. ~ ! 1
!, ] ~o I) !~q ~ .~' II
I U" 0 ~~
l'~ r""\) D33J ~8
k:"1~ ~ ~ k~11~ @(3 &~ ~ .~.
j' ......" " " , __~. I,:
Q ~ 00 €I
. -
~: - )
EXHIBIT "B"
![ ~[ Ii i iI i f if Ii IIi r ~i
"II !t ;J i 'll I till H' t :.
" ;j I I ~ H' 1 I
i[ II' h ~ Ii' In HJl1t J
~r !. [~! I! il,~ ;11 r 1
!pHi ~t hl ,t f
I If I,' ~ 1 f IJ' tl I i
. ,'l, tit I
, 1 I I : I. lit I' I
1 L 1 I I 111,' i
1 · ,
......
alMa
(
........
...lJWM.,
-0-
..
. ::>
Go
,
or-
~
z
o
CIl
o
~
"U
11\
"U
r-
~
Z
~.~-\:
.. {
-- \
".1. IRI'T
I
lIIIIB IImPJllllllll NIl SXZ1.
1JQQ S. KACIIltS1 "'10
8O"fNlQN .604 .. nDlllr\I 11
MILORD Comnanv "O~"o<,u.,
.. ~ "r"'>~''''''__''''
-'-'-- - ---... - .-,......-.
.-
'!
. m:: ! -, ijflrl
. . l I .~..-
'"" ; ': ...... ...-. -"""-
KEY PLAN. SITE P
.....1 LIollllSCAPE PLAN
..11 i
:0
ft~~ ~
Iiil !
i
a
[IU
I'll jiiii
flu nu
In inn
I~. lun
d !i;::
U Ii
1;
I
laUd .1..1
--
=!
.'
;~
===....---- !;
IWiW;~; 5
i~!dUWi!
~:.r rrr H
ilt m -
.i~!5E~iiijii
lSll!!15!SU!U
::;:::~=::::::::
<< ,
EXHIBIT "B"
~ ~ I
I
!~
- !i!
EXISTlN0 ROAD IJ
- ji
.~
i
--.J
I t
n
~
~
~~
~.~)) 1
~ ~ {
~
i
~
o
n~
,"
.
,
,
,
,
/:----
..
I ~ - :;;;=-
,~
r-
l ~.-Q.
i!:.~t'f$'l.
t:"": ~.... ~
"II~'i..:,.......
.~~ ~~...
1[-= "-,.il ~
~~f
I \
, ,
~
~
"
-
,
~ -
)
"'-;["
,I ,/ I r~
'~~; I I ijj ~II~ f
\ l............. I - ... "tJ -
'1 ...~"-C",...,.....,i...,l ~ 'I
,'- -.. --.r:::--'::;r-/ ........ - ~ : J' !
\.;.~ '-...----...,. ~~ !
-----1------------T::-_ T_ -... ue
~ --.--.--.--.-
I __.__.__.__.__.__._..:;.;.,..,......
-.--.-'"-'--
ill
~
~Ol~
ft -1\
~
......... I
C. ~-__
" I '- ;11~.l1~nl~~1!
~ ~ 'I ~; . ~ ~t
--
I
I
I
il
I"
.~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
iJ\
<:
z
\:::)
z
>
<
rTl
~~
f'Ti~
:.
l'
rJ ~
~ ~
~
~
r
E.
:~':: =..=~
11~~oOR. ~~AN 115T~~~"~~!am I MILORD Company :~~;-~~.:::
EXHIBIT "e"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: St. Joseph's Episcopal Church
File number: COUS 98-002
Reference: The plans consist of 10 sheets identified as 2nd Review, Conditional Use. File # COUS 98-002
with a SePtember 21, 1998 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments: None X
UTILITIES
Comments: None X
FIRE
Comments: None X
POLICE
Comments: None X
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
1. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the city's code X
requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not
limited to the following: site lighting, pavmg, drainage, curbing,
landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting
agencies, such as FDOT, PBC, SFWMD, DERM, L WDD, DEP and any
others, shall be included with your permit request.
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
2. Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan, Section 10.I.1, of the Land X
Development Regulations, specifies that, "Signs shall be designed and
treated as part of the architecture of the building and shall be reviewed at
time of site plan review". Therefore, add a note to sheet A2 (Elevations)
indicating that wall signage for the Youth Building is not approved.
..., Add to sheet C-2 (Water and San. Sewer, Paving and Drainage - Plan) X
-'.
and MP-1 (Site and Landscape Plan) a symbol that represents the
location and path of the accessible route that is required from the
proposed Youth Building to the accessible entrance to all other buildings
located on the site.
4. At time of permit review add to sheet C-l (Site and Landscape Plan) the X
-""---------'_.
Page 2
St. Joseph's Episcopal Church
File No.: COUS 98-002
DEP AR TMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
actual setback dimensions from the property line to the leading edge of
all sides of the proposed building and/or canopies. Also correct the
inconsistency between the proposed 33 foot 8 inch west building setback
identified on sheet MP-l and the same west building setback identified
on sheet MP-2 at 34 feet 8 inches.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None X
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments: None X
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
5. Sign and seal all plans. ChA Sec.7 X
6. All plans shall be drawn to the same scale. To meet this requirement, X
provide one master sheet depicting the whole site at 1 ";:40' as a location
plan, and a separate enlarged site plan, water and sewer plan, and
landscape plan sheets at 1";:10'. ChA Sec.7
7. Correct direction of north arrow on the landscape plan. ChA Sec.7. X
8. Complete a minimum of 25% of the total cost of the improvements X
within one (1) year of receiving conditional use approval (from date that
development order is executed).
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
9. None. X
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
10. To be determined.
MWRJdim
JlSHRDA T AIPLANNING\SHARED\WPIPROlECTS\ST.lOSEPHS EPISCOPAL CHURCH\COUS\COND. OF APPR.2ND REVIEW DOC
DEVELOPMENT ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PROJECT NAME: St. Joseph's Episcopal Church
APPLICANT'S AGENT: Jerome F. Milord
APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: 3600 S. Congress Avenue
DATE OF CITY COMMISSION: 10/20/98
TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Conditional Use
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 3300 S. Congress Avenue
DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO.
X THIS MA TIER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida
appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above. The City Commission hereby adopts the
findings and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board, which Board found as follows:
OR
THIS MA TIER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the
relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative
staff and the public finds as follows:
1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with
the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations.
2. The Applicant
.lL. HAS
HAS NOT
established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested.
3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or
suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set
forth on Exhibit "C" with notation "Included".
4. The Applicant's application for relief is hereby
.1L GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof.
DENIED
5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk.
6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms
and conditions of this order.
7. Other
DATED:
City Clerk
J:\SHRDAT A\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\St.Josephs Episcopal Church\COUS\DEVELOPMENT ORDER.doc
----~----
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
Division of Planning and Zoning
Bulent I. Kastarlak, NeARB
Director
Building
Planning & Zoning
Engineering
Occupational License
Community Redevelopment
October 27, 1998
Jerome F. Milord
3600 South Congress Ave.
Boynton Beach, FL 33462
Re:
File No.:
Location:
St. Joseph's Episcopal Church
COOS 98-002
3300 South Congress Ave.
Dear Mr. Milord:
Enclosed is the City of Boynton Beach Development Order for conditional use approval
granted on October 20, 1998.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact this office at
(561)742-6260.
Sincerely,
--;1., -/
/~:..-- ,,-- -: I...--~
" I
Michael W. Rumpf
Acting Planning and Zoning Director
MWR:jma
J:\SHRDA T A IPLANNINGISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSISTJOSEPHS EPISCOPAL CHURCH\COUSIDEVELOPMENT ORDER L TR.DOC
America's Gateway to tlte Gulfstream
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 375-6260 FAX: (561) 375-6259
EXHIBIT "C"
Conditions of Aporoval
Project name: S1. Joseph's Episcopal Church
File number: COUS 98-002
Reference: The plans consist of 10 sheets identified as 2nd Review, Conditional Use. File # COUS 98-002
with a September 21, 1998 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking.
DEPARTMENTS . INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments: None X
UTILITIES
Comments: None X
FIRE
Comments: None X
POLICE
Comments: None X
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
1. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the city's code X
requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not
limited to the following: site lighting, pavmg, drainage, curbing,
landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting
agencies, such as FOOT, PBC, SFWMD, DERM, L WDD, DEP and any
others, shall be included with your permit request.
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
2. Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan, Section 10.1.1, of the Land X
Development Regulations, specifies that, "Signs shall be designed and
treated as part of the architecture of the building and shall be reviewed at
time of site plan review". Therefore, add a note to sheet A2 (Elevations)
indicating that wall signage for the Youth Building is not approved.
3. Add to sheet C-2 (Water and San. Sewer, Paving and Drainage - Plan) X
and MP-l (Site and Landscape Plan) a symbol that represents the
location and path of the accessible route that is required from the
proposed Youth Building to the accessible entrance to all other buildings
located on the site.
4. At time of permit review add to sheet C-l (Site and Landscape Plan) the X
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-475
TO:
FROM:
Carrie Parker
City Manager
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP, ~
Planning and Zoning Director
DATE:
September 12, 1996
SUBJECT:
Copies of Development Plans of Current Projects
Scheduled for Review by the City Commission at the
September 17, 1996 City Commission Meeting
Please find attached five (5) sets of plans for the following current development projects:
Conditional Use
St. Joseph's Episcopal Church
COUS 96-004
Master Plan Modification
Woolbright Place PUD (POD 1)
(2nd Submittal)
MPMD 96-005
Major Site Plan Modification -
Boynton Beach Community Development
Corporation office
MSPM 96-006
New Site Plan
Flower's Bakery Warehouse/Distribution Center
- Quantum Park PID
NWSP 96-006
Note: Please return the plans/documents to the Planning and Zoning Department
following the meeting.
If I can be of further assistance, please contact me.
TJH:bme
Attachments
cc: Central File
Subject File
a:tranplan.912
<;'()..~
<1.:
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-396
TO: TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Carrie Parker, City Manager
Bob Eichorst, Public Works Director
Al Newbold, Building Division
William Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Sgt. Marlon Harris, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Chief Field Insp,
Mike Haag, Planning & Zoning Department
Jerzy Lewicki, Planning & Zoning Department
William Hukill, Development Department
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden, AICP
Planning & zoning Director
DATE: August 6, 1996
SUBJECT: Administration Technical Review Committee Meeting - Tuesday, August
6, 1996.
On August 6, 1996, at 9:00 A,M., a staff-only meeting to discuss the
submittal below will be held in the 2nd Floor Conference Room, Room 201,
Mangrove Park School.
1. Old Business
None
2. New Business
A. New Site Plan:
1.
PROJECT:
Boynton Commons PUD
LOCATION:
The southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and
Congress Avenue
AGENT:
Land Design South
OWNER:
Bill Ray Winchester, Elsie A.Winchester
DESCRIPTION:
Request for site plan approval to construct a
213,650 square foot retail center including
five (5) leased out parcel buildings on 22.885
acres.
NOTE:
As previously stated in Planning and Zoning
Department Memorandum No. 96-393, written
comments for item Blare to be returned to
the Planning and Zoning Director no later than
5:00 P.M., Tuesday August 13, 1996.
B. Conditional Use A~plication:
1.
PROJECT:
St. Joseph's Episcopal Church
r
Co V "} ~
q~ / 00
Page 2
Administrative TRC
August 6, 1996
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
NOTE:
3300 South Seacrest Boulevard
Jerome F. Milord
St. Joseph's Episcopal Church
Request to construct a 1787 square foot
addition, for a new classroom, a covered
walkway and a washroom facility.
As previously stated in Planning and
Zoning Department Memorandum No. 96-
395, written comments for item 2 A are to
be returned to the Planning and Zoning
Director no later than 5: 00 P.M. ,
Tuesday, August 13, 1996.
C. Master Plan Modification:
1.
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
DESCRIPTION:
NOTE:
4. Other Business
NONE
5. Comments by members
6. Adjournment
a:TRCSPECL.806
Woolbright Place PUD (POD 1)
Approximately 1,000 feet north of the
intersection of Woolbright Road and S.W.
8th Street.
Richard C.
Consultants
Wohlfarth,
P.E,
CCL
Howard Scharlin, Trustee
Request to amend the previously approved
master plan to change the dwelling units
within Pod 1 from 90 multifamily dwelling
units to 85 single-family, detached
dwelling units; reduce the north PUD
perimeter building setback from 60 feet
to 40 feet and reduce the perimeter
building setback along S. W. 8th Street
from 40 feet to 25 feet; establish a 15
foot south perimeter building setback and
a 20 foot east perimeter building
setback, and add private recreation on
14.05 acres.
Written comments and plans for item C 1
are to be returned to the Planning and
Zoning Director no later than 5:00 P.M.,
Tuesday, August 12, 1996.
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-464
Agenda Memorandum for
September 17, 1996, City Commission Meeting
TO:
Carrie Parker
City Manager 1), . ,JA/lv,JLL
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP v~ 7J1d
Planning and Zoning Directcl '-
FROM:
DATE:
September 12, 1996
SUBJECT: St. Joseph's Episcopal Church and School - COUS 96-004
CONDITIONAL USE approval for an addition to Building No.5
Please place the above-referenced item on the September 17, 1996 City Commission
agenda under Public Hearing.
DESCRIPTION: Jerome F. Milord, agent for St. Joseph's Episcopal Church, is requesting
conditional use approval for an addition of a classroom to the existing Classroom Building
No. 5 of 984 square feet, addition of washroom/mechanical space (in place of the
previously approved 300 square feet restroom facility) of 458 square feet and extension
of an existing covered walkway along the western side of the building of 438 square feet.
The total square footage of the facility will be increased from the approved 58,117 square
feet to 59,695 square feet, a net increase of 1,578 square feet. The existing church is
located at 3300 South Seacrest Boulevard, zoned R1AAB. For further details pertaining
to this request, please refer to attached Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum
No. 96-434.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Board, with a 6-0 vote, recommended
approval subject to all the staff comments in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval.
T JH:dim
Attachments
xc: Central File
c:ST JOSEPH.WPD
EXHIBIT "C"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: St. Joseph's Episcopal Church
File number: COUS 96-004
Reference: The plans consist of 7 sheets identified as 1st Review. Conditional Use.
File # COUS 96-004 with a July 29. 1996 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp
marking
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS
(' - --.-
Il~: N{ INI-
UTILITIES
'lenis: ~E
FIRE
- IE
LUIIII I~I
POLICE
~nrn""nrs' ~E
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Comments:
1. Show handicap ramps and parking spaces. Florida
Accessibility Code, Chapter 4, Section 4.1 (a) and
(b), page 8.
2. Provide lighting plan. LOR Chapter 23, Article IIA 1 a
and b, pages 23-6 and 23-7.
3. Provision for handicap ramp as per Section 4.8 of
the Accessibility Code is not shown.
4. Provision for handicap parking and loading as per
Section 4.6 of the Accessibility Code is not shown.
5. Provision for site lighting as per Section 7.b.4 of the
Land Development Regulations is not shown.
RECREA TION/PARKS DEPARTMENT
- . NONE
( .1
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments:
6. The applicant should indicate on the plans any
existing trees which will be preserved, relocated or
as ~ rA!::.lllt of the .
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Comments:
7. On Sheet C-2, Site Plan, indicate traffic flow pattern
of the on-site vehicular system, as required by the
city's Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2 -
ZoninQ, Section 11.2.F.5Q.
'"
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
8. Provide parking calculations in accordance with the
city parking regulations for the entire site in regard
to required parking spaces. Parking calculations
should reflect requirements of the American
Disability Act.
9. The parking layout as shown on site plan, sheet 5
of 7 does not match the layout as presented on
paving and drainage plan, sheet 3 of 7. Provide
consistency between these two sheets
10. To show compliance with the city standards,
indicate dimensions of parking aisles and
driveways.
11. Depict on the site plan the height and building
materials of all fences and buffer walls.
12. Clearly identify on the site plan all existing and new
outdoor Iiahtina fixtures.
13. On the proposed site plan, Sheet C-2, insufficient
data regarding site development, as required by the
Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2 -Zoning,
Section 11.2.F.5n., is provided. Add missing
information to comply with the above city's code
provision. In particular, indicate changed ratio of
pervious/impervious areas.
14. Indicate on the site plan, Sheet 5 of 7 the previous
location of the relocated 5th grade classroom and
note proposed use of this space.
15. On both sheets 2 of 7, and 4 of 7 amend the indices
to include correct submittal items
16. If roof-top equipment will be installed on the
building, it shall be installed in accordance with
Land Development Regulations, Chapter 9, Section
11. E.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
CONDITIONS
17. NONE
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
9. To be determined.
JLldim
c: STJOSEPHWPD
/1
7.A.l
CONDITIONAL USE
ST. JOSEPH'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-434
TO: Chairman and Members
Planning, and Devel~ment Board
70 -tv, 7f- ~
THRU: Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Jerzy Lewicki
Assistant Planner
DATE: September 4,1996
SUBJECT: St. Joseph's Episcopal Church and School- COUS 96-004
Conditional Use Approval for an addition to Building No.5
INTRODUCTION:
St. Joseph's Episcopal Church is an existing church containing a school on 14.68 acres
located at 3300 South Seacrest Boulevard (see enclosed Exhibit A -location map). Jerome
F. Milord, agent for the church, is requesting conditional use approval for the following:
- Addition of a classroom
to the existing Classroom
Building No. 5
984 sq. ft.
- Addition of WashroomlMechanical space
(in place of previously approved
300 sq. ft. restroom facility)
458 sq. ft.
- Extension of an existing covered
walkway along the western
side of the building
438 sq. ft.
The total increase of square footage would be 1,878 sq. ft. (see enclosed Exhibit B -
proposed site plan).
As a result of this addition, the total square footage of the facility will be increased from the
approved 58,117 square feet to 59,695 square feet (net increase of 1,578 square feet). The
church property area remains at 14.68 acres.
The existing church and school facility is located in the R-1AAB, Single-family Residential
zoning district, and previous approval history is outlined below:
- Original conditional use approval - 1972
- Approval of an expansion of the facility - 1988
- Approval of further expansion of the facility - 1994
- Approval of further expansion of the facility - 1995
- Approval of further expansion of the facility - 1996.
SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING: (see Exhibit "A" -location map)
North - single-family homes zoned R-1AAB;
South - undeveloped land zoned PUD;
I
Page 2
Planning and Zoning Department
Memorandum No. 96-434
St. Joseph's Episcopal Church and School
East - single family homes and farther northeast Seacrest Scrub, zoned
R-1AA; and
West - single family homes zoned R-IAAB
STANDARDS FOR EV ALUA TING CONDITIONAL USES: Section 1l.2.D of the Zoning
Code contains the following standards applicable to conditional uses. Following each of
these standards is the Planning and Zoning Department's evaluation of the application as it
is measured against the standards:
"The Planning and Development Board and City Commission shall consider only
such conditional uses as are authorized under the terms of these zoning regulations
and, in connection therewith, may grant conditional uses absolutely or conditioned
upon the conditions including, but not limited to, the dedication of property for
streets, alleys, recreation space and sidewalks, as shall be determined necessary for
the protection of the surrounding area and the citizens' general welfare, or deny
conditional uses when not in harmony with the intent and purpose of this section.
In evaluating an application for conditional use, the Board and Commission shall
consider the effect of the proposed use on the general health, safety and welfare of
the community and make written findings certifying that satisfactory provision has
been made concerning the following standards, where applicable:
1. Ingress and egress to the subject property and proposed structures thereon, with
particular reference to automobile and pedestrian safety and convenience,
traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. "
The site has two (2), two-way driveways connecting the internal vehicular use
area with the adjacent streets; one on the east at South Seacrest Boulevard,
and one on the west at Swinton Avenue.
"2. Off-street parking and loading areas where required, with particular attention
to the items in Subsection 1 above, and the economic, glare, noise, and odor
effects the conditional use will have on adjacent and nearby properties, and the
city as a whole. "
As part of the 1988 expansion approval, a shared parking allocation was
approved. By code, the various principal uses on site would require 265
parking spaces allocated as follows: church - 75 spaces, existing school- 24
spaces, new classrooms - 12 spaces, parish hall - 44 spaces, fellowship hall - 44
spaces, and the new gymnasium - 133. The current shared parking study
was revised to include the schedule (day and time) of religious and non-
religious activities and the enrollment ( limited to 225 students and 28 staff
by the deed restriction). The study indicated that the church sanctuary is
primarily used for services on Sundays and that the school operates on
weekdays. Certain other ancillary uses occur on Saturdays and weekdays,
during both daytime and evening hours.
The peak parking demand was shifted to (and continues to be) the hours of
operation of the gymnasium. Since there was no overlap of the gymnasium
use with other activities, for the gymnasium staff determined that the
minimum number of parking spaces required was 133. The 133 parking
spaces is the number of spaces shown on the previous site plan modifications
dated 1988 and 1994. In 1995,31 new parking spaces were added north of
the gymnasium building. The proposed plan does not include additional
2-
Page 3
Planning and Zoning Department
Memorandum No. 96-434
St. Joseph's Episcopal Church and School
parking spaces despite the net increase of 1,578 square feet attributed to new
classroom space and the covered walkway; however, since student enrollment
is locked in by deed restriction for traffic purposes and, since the relocated
classroom will not increase the demand for parking, the previously approved
shared parking allocation methodology remains acceptable.
"3. Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the items in Subsection 1
and 2 above. II
No dumpster relocation is proposed. The current location was previously
approved by the Public Works Department. No concerns regarding service
areas have been raised.
"4. Utilities, with reference to locations, availability, and compatibility. "
No comments were generated by neither the Fire Department nor the Utility
Department.
"5. Screening, buffering and landscaping with reference to type, dimensions, and
character. "
No new buffering or screening is required at this time. Existing trees
conflicting with the proposed construction will be relocated.
"6. Signs, and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to glare, traffic safety,
economic effect, and compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby
properties. "
No additional signs or exterior lighting plans were submitted to the city at
the time of evaluation of this proposal. The conformance of the exterior
lighting and/or signs with the city code will be determined at the permit
stage.
"7. Required setbacks and other open spaces. "
Required setbacks and other open space requirements are met.
" 8. General compatibility with adjacent properties, and other property in the zoning
district. "
There has not been a history of public comments nor criticism. The proposed
additions are not expected to change compatibility with adjacent properties.
"9. Height of buildings and structures, with reference to compatibility and
harmony to adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole. "
The height of the proposed addition is limited to approximately 16' and will
match the height of the existing Classroom Building No.5. This proposed
height will meet the city's height regulations of a maximum of 25 feet in
residential districts.
" 10. Economic effects on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole. "
No negative economic effects are anticipated since the purpose of the
proposed construction is only to provide a new location for a relocated
3
Page 4
Planning and Zoning Department
Memorandum No. 96-434
St. Joseph's Episcopal Church and School
classroom.
" 11. Conformance to the standards and requirements which apply to site plans, as
set forth in Chapter 19, Article II of the City of Boynton Beach Code of
Ordinances. {Part III Land Development Regulations Chapter 4J. "
Compliance of permit drawings with attached staff comments will provide
conformance to the above-referenced requirements.
"12. Compliance with, and abatement of nuisances and hazards in accordance with
the Performance Standards Section 4 of the zoning regulations; also,
conformance to the City of Boynton Beach Noise Control Ordinance. "
No additional effect is foreseen. The Police Department indicated that there
have not been any complaints relative to the existing use.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Department recommends approval of this conditional use
request, subject to the comments included in Exhibit C - Conditions of Approval. The
Technical Review Committee recommends that the deficiencies identified in Exhibit "C"
be corrected on the set of plans submitted for building permits.
xc: Central File
c:epis-P&D.rep
JL: bme
l#
EJ(Ul.Bl.T
" 1\."
# .
~
LO~~,.\ON Mp..f
;;7 ----d', rl ~ 'tIT ?:: \' ,~..".. ~ ~~ j1","'", 1'1 J i{Lr.n-
. v :.A" _ . II lQ _~ J, ' -; ( In \ -l:j
:.\,\,.ll.T . : 'fil TlIl ~::: ,~., II ,p'f t\.. Ii :ll\
\ \ " ll..: " r " ,r- . . 1. 1 t II' :--
,-1 ; " J I='! 0 ' A ... c<;\':::- .- - ." 91 ~ ,\ ,',.\'II iYI ~ i;l
_ ~ Tt ') , 15':1 fi''<;.'~ " 1 +-' '1=' ',~~ \.. -..;;: ,. 1\ II r '\ '\ if F
rT"- .. _,l O:lI. II. ...t::l~.. ,\.X..' .t . PI ~ \ " \., ~C- 'l.'
, (' I ' ' , I ... . .~~. n . -'" ;::)'; ~ \ .,,'
,;Tl, ,~: 1~1 ~ ':'-,~ ~ '"~~ .iJ _ ~::jil \ \I ,\ r \\D-I-' ,\("'f-
_..' _ :. j' If H' 1 '-<: v;r. """ \ <:'II"!:: ' t:. - ,\ ttJ \..~ rn : r
t- t '~z' 'rifT 1" L I " ~l- ~. ,., A..''' - .r ,-, \ : --....-=~it
, t:.' : ;rrT < 11 ' ..' _," - 7t--:c:--1- ,,1,1 '
" .. L . . ,. - " 11 \ '
. 'I" <J-"1' . _,T I'
__ ' '" n' m ~.
....._... ,\ JI Jlr-'I/"(\.11.1~1. -, .:;:,.....' c 1""'\\' ~i'\'O ;
,. . . __ ~.f I 1-"'.... \ Tn" - ..- ' :
~'~f~\;' :,'~ II! ~';~t\':~2, ~~\.1;r\'\t ~~~~~\ ~ ~~i ;',' l' . I C,
. ' . . . 1,'.1" I T" \ 1~ .'fI' , -' l' I
; .....,-;:" iJ I \/I~ \ \ n ,~\~ ~~ -~"1;- I;lti? .,. ~ \.~ ~ ,; ~""
, ,_~-.~ IJ 1, ..... ~_~\T\-\r .' . -' : c-i I ~, ':UL "\.r t ~ !' ;)
, ,: ,~ f is ...... -'l ' j . .. Ln . t'J- . . IJ- c.'
,I, il, C ' ~.~ _\.&i>:;:'':: ~( . ". ,-nIl; ";
~! /1/1. \ . :j'1 "\ :S:;i~ fj;:-~ ~'1 a.'p. I='~ ~~. ~
.: / II '~.. -'~ 1 - -n \ '., ' ~ .
;' 1/ jj rt '~ ": ~. . ~ ' ( " 1- ,-" '. : '---" I
,: 1/ Cr,-::.- t;}., .I I ~ ~ -, \ I \ - ,1 '-I" 1:5- ..----i c;rH
l : I " , _ .,nT' ' u... _, i ~ U
\ :'/I:if!I/I/!~1 Jf!] .' \~~~~; ~-::~wrny~, ~ ~~ p
,IJII/I:i' .. \}h,JJ'\ ~, ~I'. · r-y Ji _Nt"'j
'~ I'I'~ /1 j ~ !.k-.~~ '. \JJ, 'C\f\t\' \. \.. ,- .h . .: .. "':""," .I,i, C 3, _t'I" I
1'1, J. i.f _ .. ..-1~'~ _~ ! ":''-'- F\ll~~ I c:'"'' --1
,/,.,,/1 I ",' 1~=-~' \St. S\-r~ ~\l ,\ \i',r "-l.u:~" ';.~';'
, r ' L __ --\ '.r~'~ 1J .. I '. \ t:::... ' "
, :'~: dJ-2 " ,,-..' '. ,hl;{. , , ~ \ \\ " f \ . ~:
, .' ,I "'~..'" ' . \ \. I _J \. I \ ';' I
,t ,.-.. '-l~' ~7 ...tf' I " ~. \.. L fL ,;:: ~l\' ~~1 -~ j
,. "~I ~'.,....; '.S. ,.' _1' ,? rU' II' ,"U',: -
I '..,~ .""",,, ., L l~ .\r ,1,'''''' - :
" ( -."'" . /..."l \ ~ ,.' :
'I' I \\ '/ .. ,c.1 .,,1, I, . c,,\ L.\ :
. I '\ {J" ;:::;:",~ '. :-\ ' : I
I,; \\:::'- <..) \ .~,~" \ n '. :
-1\ ~\; .w .,\\U : .
,: \~. \"' ,~.\\I--\ ,d \lD~,\;,\~s:l;2 I
, \ ~~ T \C1 \ I'C\ r:O\:I..dit:O~:Oi":
.l- ' . 'i.,~ ." ,-;::\D.f-r \'1\:.~ j --
J v \l~':'" Q"" r, \ ~-,...-r.rre-\Y" f--\:\}' r'::' '.;" ,",,\~\U (~ - ·
~ . <, _ ~A --' \---- ~.~ l-'YM' ~ ~i~]'B-':t'\t1Tl LJ.~-~ I - -'
. I ,c' - ,-I \ I j' 1'1.11' .1J-" ., " -",
,rtl{--: \\:tf\"'t. .~~ ::1;;5;,},i'(\ :~~;i; I I, i .
L.l..L'1. N01E ~
'0 '\ 18 \oJ\'LES,\
llO'~ '\ \ \ \\0\\0 r~Ei
~
E X H I BIT
liB II
I .
'1
ft[fj~
~~d.~g
~:Jn~
r[a~~1
..fl~h
f[la~J
s-za-f'll z
~I~'fe~
.. [ j'~
[ 5 ':'2:
ihHf
.i:r;<~l
w. ['" I
~~f~ii!
fn.~!
f. ~i"i
11 .._.
II. i:l-
.iFi
i'l_,f:
~iUf
dUf
He~:..
fll'C'i-:Z
,.<:~
.,.~-
.... ,
i3!l.~
g~
~ " c~
~ ; ~
~
UUI
~ J~~ii
3 ~~~~~
o f2 li~;;
. ~! 'i~" ~ I'~
8 s:2D8 h 01 ~
@c2; &~ i
--~
8 ",'."Ir9-.V
AiltNl;I.c..
(:)
o 8
i
=
-0-
:;CIl
. -
,.....
I'll
-. "
. ::l
a.
I.
or
':1>0
Z
o
CIl
(')
:1>0
"D
I'll
"D
r
:1>0
z
-0
:D
O~
-0
o
en
m
o
)>
o
o
=f
5
z
CE8J
CE8J
I onJ I
J~
'/ ~
rmJ
rmJ
,-.,
8
o
1 0 0 00
c::==: : _
~ <:) 8 (;.
o
-"
"SCASReST
BOULE ~R8 ..
8ri1Jff!lf?J~ , KEY PLAN. SITE PLAN
L.:...JUtJ~" -_..=::- and LANDSCAPE PLAN
. - fw .i f
lt~ tt i ~l' ~
~~ ~ t h~ ~
J~ ~ ~r . it' ~
:tLE' l ~~IE .
:')1 ~!'I 1 i
t ~ ~. 2 f
i> t~ Jj; :r-
lJ PO" III
~ ~ r l i~
t: : ~ h
8" i It
"E ~ l H
,. t" I
~l ;: l ):\
If.. I> t <Co,
H ~l ~ I' 5
.~ - i-:
II' )lst .. ,
n ~5' l J t. f
ie tl~ .
. W ~ E f,
II ur~ , <
h th I ~ i
., ~f'
'. "e
I~ H T (I
." t
n ~~ r I!
l --
I~ ~~ .e. 1
-~ ~~. : ~
irg= -
. u ~t
It. Jil ....it
.. ::c
. t --
h_
il ~~
:'4. ....
ii
h ! I ~~
i q a
~
808
IQIC:! ;:: '::O<DCIf ..........""........ i5'
~j! ~~~!1~ga;~~~~~ ~
!;! ~~~!~:~hR2~~
e~i ..~~~H~l<~H ~~
i~S o..ilil lil~~glillil ~~
-< -4 om 1"1'16 3"'"' ,...r-
i ~6~5 5m~05~ ~
, j ">;;l;;l oZ;;:;;:
~! ~~g 0 !!~
~~2
~!:i
21!
~~l
a~!l
Sa
~!~~~t;
~ ..o.......~
p pppp
;l ;l;l;l;l
-~_o."'N
~~~;~~
ppp-ppp
;l;l;l;:l;:l;:l
"
:,
~('l""?,,
Sf,mMsBmPlI.lHIlOl/ltl'!OOl MILORD Company :~.;~;:::t:;
B~~~ :::i:(~T ~~'... NOl ....'" -.-,.IlOl 00_ - ..~,. .(M!lo~ ~ Pial ~.-)eOO
s>
E 1t. U 1. 'B 1. '1'
" C "
,
q
EXHIBIT "C"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: St. Joseph's Episcopal Church
File number: CO US 96-004
Reference: The plans consist of 7 sheets identified as 1 st Review. Conditional Use.
File # COUS 96-004 with a July 29. 1996 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp
marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS
. NONE
UTILITIES
CUI '~E
FIRE
CUI . NONE
POLICE
CUI . NONE
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Comments:
1. Show handicap ramps and parking spaces. Florida
Accessibility Code, Chapter 4, Section 4.1 (a) and
(b), page 8.
2. Provide lighting plan. LOR Chapter 23, Article IIA 1 a
and b, pages 23-6 and 23-7.
3. Provision for handicap ramp as per Section 4.8 of
the Accessibility Code is not shown.
4. Provision for handicap parking and loading as per
Section 4.6 of the Accessibility Code is not shown.
5. Provision for site lighting as per Section 7.b.4 of the
Land Development Regulations is not shown.
RECREATION/PARKS DEPARTMENT
r. . NONE
FORESTERlENVI RONMENT ALlST
Comments:
6. The applicant should indicate on the plans any
existing trees which will be preserved, relocated or
'/reolaced as a of the ornip.d.
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Comments:
7. On Sheet C-2, Site Plan, indicate traffic flow pattern
of the on-site vehicular system, as required by the
city's Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2 -
Zoning, Section 11.2.F.5Q.
10
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
8. Provide parking calculations in accordance with the
city parking regulations for the entire site in regard
to required parking spaces. Parking calculations
should reflect requirements of the American
Disability Act.
9. The parking layout as shown on site plan, sheet 5
of 7 does not match the layout as presented on
paving and drainage plan, sheet 3 of 7. Provide
consistency between these two sheets
10. To show compliance with the city standards,
indicate dimensions of parking aisles and
driveways.
11. Depict on the site plan the height and building
materials of all fences and buffer walls.
12. Clearly identify on the site plan all existing and new
outdoor liqhtinq fixtures.
13. On the proposed site plan, Sheet C-2, insufficient
data regarding site development, as required by the
Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2 -Zoning,
Section 11.2.F.5n., is provided. Add missing
information to comply with the above city's code
provision. In particular, indicate changed ratio of
pervious/impervious areas.
14. Indicate on the site plan, Sheet 5 of 7 the previous
location of the relocated 5th grade classroom and
note proposed use of this space.
15. On both sheets 2 of 7, and 4 of 7 amend the indices
to include correct submittal items
16. If roof-top equipment will be installed on the
building, it shall be installed in accordance with
Land Development Regulations, Chapter 9, Section
11. E.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
CONDITIONS
17. To be determined.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
9. To be determined.
JUdim
c: STJOSEPHWPD
J ,
~.
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-588
Agenda Memorandum for
october 17, 1995 city commission Meeting
TO: Carrie Parker
city Manager
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zoning Director
DATE: October 13, 1995
SUBJECT: st. Joseph's Episcopal Church and School - COUS #95-004
conditional Use (add a K and Pre-K school building)
Please place the above-referenced request on the October 17, 1995
City Commission agenda under Public Hearing.
DESCRIPTION: This is a request from Jerome F. Milord, agent for
st. Joseph's Episcopal Church and School for conditional use
approval to add a new 6,329 square foot classroom building (pre-
school and kindergarten), minor exterior changes to the library
building, a new parking lot and conversion of two basketball courts
and a volleyball court to three new tennis courts. The 14.68 acre
site is located at 3300 South Seacrest Boulevard and zoned R-1AAB.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board, with a 7-0
vote, recommended approval subject to all staff comments (Utilities
#95-303, Fire Prevention Memorandum No. 95-343 WDC, Engineering
Division Memorandum No. 95-363, Building Division Memorandum No.
95-359 and Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-549).
~
TJH:dim
Attachment
a:CCAgenSt.Joe
7.A.2
ST. JOSEPH'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH AND SCHOOL
CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #95-531
TO: chairm3n and Members
Plannlng and Development Board
THRU: Tambrl J. Heyden
Plannlng and Zoning Director
FROM: Michael E. Haag
Zoning and Site Development Admlnistrator
DATE: October 6,1995
SUBJECT: St. Joseph's Episcopal Church and School - caus #95-004
conditlonal Use (add a K and Pre-K school building)
INTRODUCTION:
Jerome F. Mllord, agent for St. Joseph's Eplscopal Church and
School, lS requesting conditional use approval to add a new
classroom building (pre-school and kindergarten) including
playground area. The request also includes minor exterlor changes
to the library buildin'J which is located directly east of the
proposed new building, a new parklng lot and conversion of two
basketball courts and a volleyball court to three new tennis courts
(see Exhlbit "A" - proposed slte plan and letter of explanation).
Location:
3300 South Seacrest Boulevard
Land Use plan
Designation:
Low Density Resldential ( 4.84
dwelling unlts per acre)
zoning District:
Single-Famlly Residential, R-IAAB
Type of Use:
Church and School
Number of Units:
N/A
Square Footage:
New Building: 6,329 square
total)
Slte: 14.68 acres
feet
(57,156
SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING:
(See Exhibit B - location map)
North -
Existlng single family neighborhood, zoned R-1AAB
East
Seacrest Boulevard and farther east,
houses and the "Seacrest scrub",
(Slngle-family Residential)
several existlng
all zoned R-lAA
South --
undeveloped vacant land, zoned R-lAA
West
Existing, single-family neighborhood, zoned R-1AAB
STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING CONDITIONAL USES:
Section 11.2.D of the Zoning Code contains the following standards
to WhlCh conditlonal uses are requ~red to conform. Following each
of these standards is the Plannlng and Zoning Department's
evaluation of the application as it pertains to the standards. The
Planning and Development Board and Clty Commission shall consider
only such conditlonal uses as are authorized under the terms of
these zoning regulations and, In connection therewlth, may grant
condi tional uses absolutely or conditioned upon the coudi tions
includlng I but not llIDl ted to, the dedicatlon of property for
streets, alleys, recreation space and sidewalks, as shall be
determlned necessary for the protection of the surrounding area and
the citizens' general welfare, or deny conditional uses when not in
I
Page 2
Memorandum #95-531
St. Joseph Church and School
COUS #95-004
harmony with the intent and purpose of this section. In evaluating
an appl1cation for conditional use, the Board and Commission shall
cons1der the effect of the proposed use on the general health!
safety and welfare of the community and make written findings
cert1fying that satisfactory prov1s1on has been made concerning the
following standards, where applicable:
1. Ingress and egress to the sub] ect property and proposed
structures thereon, with part1cular reference to automobile
and pedestrian safety and conveluence, traff1c flow and
control, and access in case of flre or catastrophe.
The site has two (2), two-way driveways leading to the on-site
parking area, The driveways are located on Seacrest Boulevard
and Swinton Avenue. An on-site sldewalk is located adjacent
to the Seacrest Boulevard entrance access aisle to allow
pedestrian access to the project. No changes are proposed to
the eX1st1ng driveways.
2. off-street parking and loading areas where required, with
part1cular attention to the items in subsection 1 above, and
the economic, glare, noise, and odor effects the conditional
use will have on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city
as a whole,
A 1988 shared parking agreement was modified in 1994 to allow
approval of the gymnasium and classroom expansion in 1994.
The Palm Beach County Traffic Divislon also required a deed
restr1ction to be filed that limited student enrollment to
225. The subject application verifies that the student
population is below the deed restr1ction 11mit and that the
numbers referenced ln the shared parking agreement do not
change. The proposed proJect adds 31 parking spaces
bringlng the total number of spaces to 174, including 6
handicapped spaces, which is well above the 133 spaces
required by the shared park1ng agreement.
This request provides a new 6 f 329 square foot classroom
building and an adjacent 5,970 square foot fenced playground
area. The 31 new parking spaces are located north of the new
building. However based on the distance the new parking area
1S from the adj acent properties, no adverse effects are
ant1cipated.
3. Refuse and service areas, w1th particular reference to the
items in subsection 1 and 2 above.
The Public Works Department indicates theY3.nticipate no
problems with the proposed layout and waste pickups.
4. Utlli ties, v'li th reference to locations, avallablli ty, and
compatibll1ty.
ut1lities are avallable and there are no utility concerns with
the proposed new construction.
5. Screening, buffering and landscaping with reference to type,
dlmensions, and character.
The new 13.ndscaplng will be consistent with all city codes.
6. Signs, and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to
glare, trattlc safety, economlC effect, and compat1bility and
harmony w1th adJacent and nearby properties.
~
Page 3
Memorandum #95-531
st. Joseph Church and school
caus #95-004
Addit~onal parking lot lighting is not anticipated to produce
glare or pose problems for the surrounding neighborhood
provided that the recommendations set forth in Planning and
Zonlng Department Memorandum No, 95-549, regard1ng shielding
lighting and illuminatlon levels, are required as conditions
of approval.
7. Required setbacks and other open spaces.
All setbacks meet the R-lAA building and site regulations and
the majorlty of the slte remains pervious.
8. General compatibility with adj acent properties, and other
property ln the zoning dlstrict.
The existlng facility has not generated adverse comments. The
proposed additions are not expected to change compatibility
with the adjacent properties because student population is not
lncreaslng.
9. Helght of buildings and structures, with reference to
compatibility and harmony to adjacent and nearby properties,
and the City as a whole.
Building helghts are compatible wlth the rest of the slte and
the adjacent community. The hlghest point of the new building
is 21 feet, 10 inches above adjacent ground level.
10. Economic effects on adjacent and nearby properties, and the
City as a whole.
No addltional economic effects are foreseen.
11. Conformance to the standards and requirements which apply to
site plans, as set forth in Chapter 19, Article II of the City
of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. [Part III Land
Development Regulations, Chapter 4]
Compllance of permlt drawings with attached statt comments
will provide conformance to the above-referenced requ1rements.
12. Compliance with, and abatement of nuisances and hazards in
accordance with the Performance Standards, Section 4 of the
zoning regulations; also, conformance to the City of Boynton
Beach Noise Control Ordinance,
No additional effect 1S foreseen. Existing conditions meet
requirements.
REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT COMMENTS ATTACHED MEMORANDUMS #
Below is a list of those departments that have comments regarding
this request (see Exhiblt "C" - staff comments).
DEPARTMENT
ATTACHED MEMORANDUM
PubllC Works
Utilities
F~re
Police
Engineering
Buildlng
Parks and Recreatlon
Forester
Planning and zoning
N/A
9~::'-303
95-343 WDC
N/A
95-363
95-359
N/A
N/A
95-549
:5
Page 4
Memorandum ~95-531
St. Joseph Church and school
caDS #95-004
The above comments from City departments are of a nature that may
be addressed on the building permit set of drawings.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Plannlng and Zoning Department recommends approval of this
condit lanaI use request, subject to reflection of statt comments
and all other applicable City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances
on the plans submitted for building permlts.
GWL:dim
xc: Central File
~:CGnj-u6e.m ~
1
E X H I BIT
"A"
5
. !
jI
.
!
f.
i'
ll~~I:':
. II;
,.,
,I
If
:~{t-{,
,..1/1
~~
1/1
n."
>,..
~~
."
,..
>
z
~
c;
~
:
n
o
z
...
..
>
n
...
o
~
Q
~EIj
- g
;!;g::
=o~<:..
'~~f-
;~2~
~ r~~,
o ()
.; :r
> ,v.;.;:r,. ~
~
o
~en
"=i
m
-"\:J
.r-
~>
0%
. ..
: : : ~ .
"-
,.
,
<
~f ,.
, I,
I
5.,..ro..
A~';;-~ ;----u----~-t_--- -- ------ ----
,I
~~
i
o
::I
Q.
r:~
1- : .,"
, 0- \f
. ;#
... ....
~------ ,
.. --'"t--
!
.". --~- - - (~
j ~~ - ;-,.
, . -
,
,I
I
i
,,' ,
t~~ ~-~~
" . ~~
"~'I' ! i :----:iTl1IJjI' ... 'I '
I' +--~ I
L~--.::...:.~' _,_.u I
.. I ".'
: 1-'- ~1::
: i ~---_. -.U ; I
I, 1---- -~: r
.. ~ it
>
,.. ;: ;
~ 0 I ('
'-
:= ;0, ! ~ ~!
> 0
9 0 I
n '"
9 <
'"
z ,.. ~l~~
... 0
... ... ~..~.
.. . .
~ : a .~.
'" . "!i~i
z
-l L._ ~. .~
~ .;:
0 n
> 9
\\
,~
,,/
r-
>
Z
o
en
n
>
"\:J
m
'iI
~
.~.
~-.
"\:J
r
>
z
.
. .
,
~ ~' ~ ......
+" .
w"'_v
!i!
,;.
~
~i
:,,,
r--1l--,
.... ."
;; :: i
..I 'I
, I
~,
~J;J
--.,-
.~
'.........
.'
S (.to C'US T
(p
,+ '~' . '; ~;:-:J:
I ...... . -,"
. . . :~ ~
I~ ':;-".1
,____""/-r .
/-- /'---"~~ ~'"' .::~~
.
.. .
IF
"~
,~:
'i,"
I
.... .;
~: ! i
~: I i
~: . I
~
"
I
'~ ~I
~ ~
.
I ~.
@I
I
I
.J
LT
;J
- - 0"" !
l!lilfl!l~ .
HtW
i! :;"': -
~.. -<: ~
. '
:t.. '
;~~.
!!Pt
I"i!
~
'~
....7".-..
IOUl.EvAIlID
.:
I
; I h. ~
· ~ J I
,.
~
i
. ;~!j
.' -+
, +,
:+)l :';:~ .
--, :,
'. /
-'[5"
I::,'
-r -
; '-.1
~
<!II
I
-.J:
:-.~.... .
v
, .. v V' ... ~
"0,
r::::. :~ . ~i
~'+"" .<',~~: ''':.:': "'-;"-.. ) 1
~t .. ..;f....... ".' /"'--
;;;:,;!!! 'l'i .'1111;1
illf1!' H m; (, j!I,ii
· !hd! II Iii 1'1' I~:
i Ii: t:! "I ii, :
i. HtPI f( c. : ;
I 1 J If; {,
. , i. 'I' J ~
; Illjl Il'ff :1
I : I i. !! f
. If . :! IJ r
I lj i
I II ~
i! ;
'i '
f' i
,i i
II"
'I I
lL
II
. ~'fj:.'
~ J ..'
n= II
fl, U
~ ~: t t
t::
o
!
:.
"I
=O.............N - ~
leie~5ee!~!
I....."'... = "'.. at'" c;
.we: c.elWlng
g~~~~82%;lft
...cci;i&i ~'"
ii ii~"!i %~
:;:" ~-f ~..
-! !I~II ::..
E.. ""~~.
ji= D~ !!-
, -
~ .:;..,....3-....,.
i ;::!gl~8iig~
llllllUlllUUl!l1l
~~~~~:=::~::::::~
j j.i
o ..
3 ;;I
~ I
1--
___..J
, : ~! . 'j od
g ~f:i , : ~ I
a ~ ,- ~~~
~ H ~i i~ ~ .
, ~~ h -;o~
0 ,.
~! ! " II 0
~! ~
~~
~; :
....0- Il
~~ ~ . ~~
~~ ~
THE MILORD COMPANY
CONTRACTORS / ENGINEERS
9801 SOUTH INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
BRI DG EVI EW, Illl NOr s 60455
TElEPHONE:598.7900 AREA CODE 708
FAX 598-7991
September 11, 1995
City of Boynton Beach
1 00 East Boynton Beach
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
Attention: Ms. Tambri J. Heyden
Re: St. Joseph Episcopal Church and School
3300 South Sea Crest Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida
File No. COUS-95-004
Dear Ms. Heyden:
The enclosed documents reflect the changes made as a result of your review completed on
August 24, 1995. As briefly a!; possible, I will only reply to comments that are not covered
on the drawings.
Comments from Michael Haag:
1) The shared parking agreement is still valid. The proposed addition (Building
11) is not to house additional students. It is to relocate the existing students
from two separate bu'ildings (Building No. 7 and part of No.6). The
administration at St. Joseph's feels strongly that excellence in education is a
combined effort between staff and environment. The environment or
dedication of space is the reason for the addition. Building No.7, which now
houses PK-3, PK-4 and kindergarten, will be remodeled to contain the art
room and lecture room. These areas are presently contained in Building No.
6. In this phase of construction, we are also proposing a new 31 car parking
area.
2) The proposed school population is to remain the same as the present
population (note: there is only one classroom for each level: PK3, PK4,
kindergarten and grades 1 through 8. The number of students in each level
varies from 11 to 20 students.
2a) The parking summary is as follows:,
Existing: 143 with 6 accessible spaces and
2 reserved spaces for elderly
Proposed: 31 spaces
TOTAL: 174 spaces including 6 accessible spaces.
7
City of Boynton Beach
Board of Adjustment
September 11, 1995
Page 2
The State requirement is 6 accessible spaces for 151 to 200 total spaces.
Shared parking agreement: 133 spaces
2b) The impact for parking as a result of changing two existing basketball courts
and one volleyball court to three new tennis courts should be less.
existing basketball - 5 on team 10 x 2 courts = 20 people
existing volleyball - 5 on team 10 x 1 court = 10 people
TOTAL 30 people
proposed tennis courts 4 x 3 courts = 12 people
The existing arrangement has a 2.5 greater impact than the proposed.
3) See revised drawing C-1 for parking count.
4) Stucco color of buildings is to be Glidden Courtship #90YR77/100 or equal
by major paint manufacturer. Stucco bands and surrounds to be white.
5) Sheet A2 - All rooftop units and/or ground mounted condensing units shall be
screened.
6) Gymnasium building does not have an overhead door facing Seacrest and has
been previously pennitted.
7) Shrubs have been extended on Sheet C-1 to meet this request.
I have talked to Mr. Hukill on August 30, 1995, and we will comply with City requirements
and such will be indicated when construction documents are submitted for permitting. This
was agreed to by Mr. Hukill and myself.
I trust that this letter and the revised and amended drawings will be adequate for your
approval, as well as recommendation of approval to the Board.
Sincerely,
R. T. MILORD COMPANY
JRD:ba
cc: Ms. Judy Rogers - St. Joseph School
Mr. Jerry Milord - Milord Development Corporation
7
E X H I BIT
"B"
q
L f)C~1\ON MtP
S1 JOSEPH'S SCHOOL
, \! 1..If1. ,~"_. -;j" ~()~T~ _ ;~~ j'~~ \~' ~ \,' I " !ell
.-\ ~~,/~ ! 1/ '/' J;'fnff" ~-' _-I' ,~ 1 ", J :""
nrg~ ~~" rtll L " to :;::::. " .-" ... ~ .~\!;>'" I' (L
~ iel' f I//'r 1,1 rD,-~)' I Ir" ,I'
\ d;"'1l='.' " ~ ~111't ", \ %:::: ,j:::::' ~ ( T 'f ,~\; j :\r
r"-'" , 'J ; F\ ! I II. ,A' '.... .A' ;:: _';: --7{ fSt"f-' { I T II' I : ,r
_1-" --1' ~' /1 ~ ~:u.':Jij 1-- \-- . -'ltO ,;\ \ II' ~
< <H\ j , ~: 'I ....... ..-\- ' '- __.... \ I"l, :1[iiI r
'-1 \ 1 0' I, p.~\-- c.\- ,'r- P'~ \.. r{ · II ,I' .
l . i : : f '/ IS': \--_ '..: : 'I ., -' ' ~ \ \ \ I \ TI I Ii C:"
~ru. ' ~1 ~ '(;IT- ~.,.'\ "!,~.. 7 '- II \ '\ '\I ~ :
J. -.'. - : -.J rfil' )<'11 ~ ", \ -:--' Cl. - n11.." r= ' ,,, '-~ ! ,~."
;, _' "q '/ J.I L -,' - . -r~: ,- " " . > '
, .- ,~ ;,; ,/,::p";r\.I!R" 1 ( x:t:.-- "', / , ,1,''1..,\,,,;;:1'1 l
,_~ ,J "// . " -,~- n 'Trn .-
: ~. _ , ~1 . ' 1'-' . >--'-' .. ' f'" ,r ' ,," I
" \ \. , I -t r:..l->,o-1 . lU-- w-'\.- '~eJU-ir-:1t\."
.,\,.. .~;.. , ...,.' 'I' \1,' ' I \ \, I (Tf,1'i , ~ r .:' '.
~l I' L. "1-\'\ \ 1 \ ' 7' ' " ~
. ' , " ~" 1 " .~ :.jf" 1 ,-:""" . ·
1 : :__--.-:.: _ ,(~II \ 'r- ~ ~ ~,.... ~ 'iI U,. '\ '" \.-.,J : ' ,
.,;;....:;:;:;; /; . ~ \;..,.,'-?t Y ~:." ~ ,.'. ~ - r j r" : ,;::::' ~r f, 1 i' ." tl
i "I 'I ~ ("'."u ',-.:...., \, " . r -Hi ' n-. 't , ,,?J..' ' -' .,."
, I., ,! C ~ ~'i' '...:q".....~ ffi 1 ,,,,,,' \ \ ,: -rrTl , '
~,' III ',_ ':::k~-:u! r:::; T I \ I. c., ~ ~ -n...-o.. w1,j I &~ ~ ~
. .,,' ., .~.r,'\ _ r"Ci' -'
'i'i ;' J ... .. ," "'. ' \.. ' : -.:-.
,: I/;' IN'. ~' ' \ :-.' '\ _ ...;' , ; ~ 'i
! '/ I, ' ~ ! K,\ ~ L f""" ' : L.'
I ! J I! /1 1r_I;-r ;-('-- U;; \ I. "'-\ t;J;-' ...---i lJ~;(1
.. ::J;1/1I-r'-'--1 .rll' ",II \. ~
," " ~-'-
~ ,,' J ! /jl '; ': i '~ .... Tn" =-.1=:-\' I\-( , ::,4 l-- Fi-
.' I I _', p\.1U' ~ ,', ,\ r 1t'j:J \..~ -'jf I J;I.")ll 1""""1
, I ...,. 0 l " " . __ .c,' ~ ,~ c "" L I -'" -
,/11/ II '. /F-"""\, ,r\'\fCi\ ~ 1 \= '.. ~ ' ,"," "'f",<( eli C 3:1
i. "/l if' L!J':~~\ U~S,~E ~\~, ~~I~~.C\<(" \-*-'~'
I ,:!. d~~-::: (ll1A,tt. H " '\ \ \\ " \~; .., J
'/ __ -1ff5!\~;;n7 .1 C;:-'1 \.\~' \ ~~, f \ IF' ~_G.:l;
, ,I,' I . """-c---j " .:r '~. ' ,- " ~ .,. '4. f','U \11 \I' · ~\l ; >-
."","'l L l!\~'" . \ T'D, ,"1 · :
if' ( -" ' ,: " . 1 ',' ',' ' :
n; ~'\~\/ " ''\ .,..:}.:,l; ~ l " \~..;. I \.---' \ \ "
;' \" \ \," C.) J ,\?'rt:::\~ \ \' ,1' i
, ~~ .1----\ :
\ , ,\ ",', r- -r= I \ 'f" "C,-: I
. ';,: \i--:n - /' II-:::" '0 a \~JY'~''': --~
\_ " \.:'::., \~ 1 ,r \, J _Ldlf-D!:---rJ~ "
.." ' ' , )<,~" - J1T\ ,'\ \.I'" J
j v . _~ r 1l'f'\O"r1 \:r~ :;. \'':: ':::: ' iZ.;~\ \ ,,~ _1
; :' 1:'::' t:' fu\;C ::1; -, . . '('ltT. -..; I r
L1-L' 'l[ \\ >( ,-' > ~~~;--'o L> .. ,111 " 71
'0 ~ 18 MILES
IjO'~ \\ \ \~0\8\0 r~Ei
rJ..
\-
/D
E X H I BIT
"e"
;/
MEMORANDUM
Dtilities # 95-303
, ,
:, i, 1"
li I
,', ~
. i
II l'
1Lt..' .. .... .---
,,-'! r. r I~' 1',lf' (I" il'I
(~.~\i>,l.: ;.'~ !;~~. {
{~~Li!~~~,~~;:!~ ~~,.~_., -'1;~~
" I":
Ii \,; ,l,
TO: Tambri J. Heyden,
Planning & Zon'
FROM: John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilities
Date: September 21, 1995
SUBJECT: St. Joseph's Church and School,
New Site Plan, Second Review
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments:
Our previous comment, as stated on memo no. 95-260 has not been addressed, so we
repeat it below-
1. Please provide Flow and Demand calculations for the existing and proposed
additions to insure the water and sanitary sewer services to be extended are of
sufficient size to handle the proposed additional demands.
It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or
Peter Mazzella at 375-6404.
pvm
xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor
Peter Mazzella
File
,
/~
FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-343
"
fl",--f@TtIL~ml
h II ') I 1/
WD{h l " , II fl
T y 'C"
! . .---.. ~.:".;;;.;;~;,~,-;:---- i
L ,; '.;1: i:":.I/;!1D
, ,_ i'<'~.~.l~:i,nL.:r~_~
September 20, 1995
TO:
Planning Department
FROM:
Fire Department
SUBJ:
COUS 95-004
st. Joseph's Kindergarten
3300 S Seacrest Blvd
No portion of any building shall be over two hundred feet (200')
from a hydrant.
'.. '//
// I i/ c'li c:/li ci-l
W111'iam D. Cavanau'
(
I FPO
CC: Chief Jordan
FPO II Campbell
File
,
/.5
SEP ~~ 2 l~
l
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO.
95-363 00
m@mow
PLANNING AND
"'J,.' ZONING DEPt "
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
~m Hukill, P.E., City Engineer
September 21, 1995
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
ST. JOSEPH'S SCHOOL - 2ND SITE PLAN REVIEW
Applicant has complied with the following comments from our August 21,
1995 memo 95-312:
A. Provide Certification by Developer's Engineer that drainage plan
complies with all City codes & standards. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.5A,
pg.6-7 and Chap.23, Art.IIF, pg.23-8
I. Location of proposed curbs is not clearly defined on the drawing.
Chap.23, Art.I, Sec.5B15, pg.23-5
K. Parking lot dimensions, striping, aisles, stalls, radii, signs,
'landscaping, etc. must conform with City codes and standards.
Chap.23, Art.II, pg.23-6
L. Provide stop bar @ stop sign. Chap.23, Art.IIB2, pg.23-7
M. Provide 27' backup area, all stalls. Chap.23, Art.II,I1, pg.23-9
N. Parking stall minimum 18' long. Chap.23, Art.II,I1, pg.23-9
I
Other comments must be satisfied prior to permitting, as follows:
B. Minimum 15" pipe must be used in storm sewer. Chap.6, Art.IV,
Sec.5a, pg.6-7
C. Parking lot section must conform to City code. Chap.6, Art.IV,
Sec.10F, pg.6-12
D. Provide details on sanitary sewer easements that are crossed by
drainage swales. Chap.6, Art.V, Sec.4B2b, pg.6-19
E. Inverts and sumps must comply with City standards. Chap.6, Art.V,
Sec.4B2e, pg.6-20
F. Provide details for pavement, grates, pipes, catch basins, etc.
Chap.6, Art.V, Sec.4B2e, pg.6-20
G. Top of drainage pipes must not interfere with subgrade. Chap.6,
Art.V, Sec.4B2i(6), pg.6-20
J. Photometries must be approved for both pedestrian and parking lot
lighting before building permit can be issued. Chap.23,
Art.II,A1a, pg.23-6
O. All parking lots shall meet or exceed state handicap code
requirements, and comply with the standard Building Code and the
County-wide amendments thereto. Chap.23, Art.IIK, pg.23-9
Item H does not comply because it is more than 6 months out of date.
We have no objection to forwarding of these plans to the P&D Board
subject to these comments. Our review covered sheets 6 of 7, 7 of 7,
1982 survey (revised 9/20/89) and sheet C-1.
WVH/ck
xc: Ken Hall, Engineering Aide
( ':STJOSEI'Il,SI'R
/)f
-'-
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-359
61Yl,L/
September 27, 1995
TO:
Tambri Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Al Newbold
Deputy Building Official
RE:
TRC COMMENTS - SITE PLAN, 2ND REVIEW
ST. JOSEPH' S CHURCH & SCHOOL
In reviewing revised drawing C-1, parking count, I found no
handicap parking shown. My comment can only be met by compliance
or a variance.
if ~ " ~ /.,
j;/;~ r- ,/
-', r0-&v!/t~~/
Al NeTfbold '
l
AN: bh
XC: William v, Hukill, P.E.
,
STJOSBPH
/6
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-549
TO: Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Michael E. Haag
Site and Zoning Development Administrator
DATE: September 30,1995
SUBJECT: st. Joseph Episcopal Church and school - COUS #95-004
Conditional Use Approval (2nd Review comments)
The following is a list of comments regarding the second review of
the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments
are divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list
of comments that identify unresolved comments either from the first
review or new comments as a result of the second review. To show
compliance with these comments will not substantially alter the
configuration of the site and design of the building. The second
category is a list of recommendations I believe will enhance the
aesthetics and function of the project.
All comments and recommendations can be rectified on the plans at
time of permitting it the site plan request is approved. The
applicant must understand that additional comments may be generated
upon review of the documents and working drawings submitted to the
Building Department for permits for the proposed project.
I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS:
1. Please ensure that adequate grade elevations are given on
drawing to shown that maximum height above grade is
limited to twenty five feet.
II RECOMMENDATIONS
2. It is recommended that the site lighting fixtures for the
new parking facility have shields to eliminate glare to
adjacent properties. It is further recommended that the
light levels for the new parking area not exceed minimum
City standards and that light level readings above .5 not
extend outside the property line.
3. It is recommended that melaleuca mulch be used instead of
cypress bark mulch.
NOTE:
If recommendations are approved, they shall
incorporated into the working drawings required
permits for the project.
be
for
MEH:dim
xc: central File
s:2ndcomlt.Joe
/b
/
,II
RECREATION & PARKS MEMORANDUM NO. 95-380
iROM:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent kJ
August 21, 1995 1-
:-;- '-_.~ (-:G r;
:i-D{ is '" ~
\~U
l
1
U \'ij lL l~:;
j ':
~ , (i
, i' '
" '2 I 1005 i d ;
t,..' .] '0,.1"'--; ~ W .
DATE:
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
SUBJECT: St. Joseph's Church & School (Conditional Use)
The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the conditional use plan for St. Joseph's church and
school. There are no outstanding recreation related issues on this project. Plans may continue
through the normal review process.
JW:cm
_.----------"-----~_.-
ro:
Tambri Heyden, Planning Director
RECREA nON & PARKS MEMORANDUM NO. 95-377.
!i.'~7;.
,;1, f':i
I UI - 2 ./Ii,
I 1/9n5 ;t'
I '. ;
-~.~"-"....
___ZY!~~
~"-""'-v.._~
~~fr
FROM:
Kevin J. Hallahan, F oresterlEnvironmentalist
DATE:
August 18, 1995
SUBJECT:
St. Joseph's School & Church Conditional Use
The applicant should indicate any existing trees in the construction areas and show how these trees
will be impacted by the project. (Envt Ord 7.5). The project should continue on the normal review
process.
KH:cm
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDDM #95-169
TO:
Tambri 1. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SDBJ:
Site Plan Review - 2nd Review - St. Joseph's Church and School
DATE:
September 15, 1995
The Public Works Department has no problems with the above site and the plans should be
forwarded to the Planning & Development Board/Community Redevelopment Advisory for
consideration.
"
obert Eichorst
lic Works Director
RElcr
I'
I,
j i: ~
BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC UNIT
! ~ I ;. i ],:, ; ' : j t j
.l'j' \', ,'., :'(,
In.'
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REF:
T AMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR
SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT
19 SEPTEMBER 95
ST. JOSEPH'S SCHOOL 2nd MEMO #0171
l..'o......:-::..~$
I have reviewed the above plans and fi~,~:1.I~J;~obl~nJs~ tW~Jh~e.
l?~'>U ~/)~
<.,;",:::.:::::> ~R~;Pf,!.J.:~:!I..Y" '~
. ":', .......
t;,.~~~:::.::.:~:~:~! \~\lll
~;:; ',;"~ '{ ~
\..\ 9
Sgt. Marron Harris
Potiye::Qepartment
! I '<\\
.j H
tJ L~::::::::::~>' D
.:-........................~....
~ ,:;-..:..-.;....:.:....'-;;.......
~ ~ "t: ,
~ t...................,~;:~
~ r..............."-:\')
< '
.. ~ ~
~ ~................::;;: .......:
t:...:...:-:..:..:..:..........:...;.. t.~
I("T:~::::;~\
. . ,
:....................... .:?
~.^..........x...::......
, H:::::.::::.!) C1
t::~~::::::::~~:~J
\\
c:::;:~)
.............>>.
.;,t ~....,.....~~...,..
~. ~, ..\\
\~\::.. .J ~~
..:;,::....;......... . .~..~
...;..;......... i'::-~."S...:....-:-.......
.: ................ "':-.
.:= i" ..::~ ..~...y............
.t./ ./~ .l~o;....."-'}.:.}
'::..;.} l l
....;,..:.
~.......~~~............x..;,.....
~ ~~<<..'*........ '\
~ ~ ) ~
~ ~:~=:::::...l
~ l
~ ~
::o;o..J
.:-....~......~~ ->>
llll%.l
if Ii Jl
[ :: ::.... ~ ~
<:::,~:.::;:i
~,\(g
~:;1 ({::;~~::~:~:J\:.,:>'
1 , ,.. ,."
~ % ,,<::;;>,..,..
::.....~
~,
C
I T Y 0 F BOY N TON
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
AGE N D A
B E A C H
MEETING
DATE:
Tuesday, August 22, 1995
TIME:
9:00 A.M.
PLACE:
Conference Room "C", 2nd Floor, West Wing
1. Introduction
2. Old Business
NONE
3. New Business
A. LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDERS (other than site plans)
Master Plan
1.
PROJECT:
Boynton Commons - 2nd Submittal
LOCATION:
Southwest corner of Congress Avenue and Old
Boynton Road
DESCRIPTION:
Request for master plan approval to construct
a 254,030 square foot retail complex on 27.74
acres of land in connection with a rezoning
from C-3 to Planned Commercial Development
( PCD) .
NOTE:
Plans will be distributed by the applicant on
August 18, 1995 or presented at the August 22,
1995 meeting.
Time Extension
2 .
PROJECT:
Palm Walk, ACLF
LOCATION:
S.W. 19th Avenue and Roma Way
DESCRIPTION:
Request for one year time extensions for
conditional use approval and concurrency
certification for construction of a 48 Bed
ACLF built to Alzheimer/Dementia
specifications.
NOTE:
Items A. 1 and 2 - Written comments (on legal sized paper) and
plans/documents are to be returned. to the Planning and Zoning
Director no later than 5:00 P.M. on Friday, August 25, 1995 (three
working days following the TRC meeting).
REVIEW OF TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
RECEIVED
B.
conditional Use APproval
1.
PROJECT:
St. Joseph's Episcopal Church and School
LOCATION:
3300 South Seacrest Boulevard
DESCRIPTION:
Request for conditional use approval to add a
new 6482 square foot classroom building to the
existing school along with a 30 space parking
lot and tennis courts.
PREPARED BY:
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS
FOR
ST. JOSEPH"S EPISCOPAL CHURCH & SCHOOL
BOYNTON BEACH
WEST ADDITION
J UL Y 267 '1995.
~ ,
ODIsalt & !\ssntudts
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & PLANNERS
308 Greymon Drive
W8slPelm Beach, Florida 33400
(407) 833-4198
.-
//"
//r~, '~ A
/~ ,.
t~, I ,;!II ~
Olsak, P.E.
/l1i'&~
-
~/I " -
'i:,/-=
--.;;C7
\ \
\ \
i
\
,
\
\ . ."'
It'
\ (~
\
i
\
\
\ ,~ " .\.....
\ ~ "
4 ~
\ \
\ ... ~.
\ :;)
\ z
\ .... ......
> ,.; .
,
\ 4. \
\ ....
,jolt'
\ \
\
\ % 1.,;'
\ ,
0 .
\ \-
~
r .-- )! 1'S.
~ ~ (
\ U) it
"....
\ \ ,~ ~...
..,
,..
\ ..
:.;
It. ,
\ " .
\ \
\
\ \i
\
j
-~.'
,
\
-.$~
:."
_i-."S
/I~FI9
~~
_ Er/SrIHt:.
Date: 7-26-95
Olsak and Associates, Inc.
Surface Water Management Calculations
Project ID: St.Joseph"s
1.
Proposed Acreages
1 . Lakes = 0
2. Roofs = .06
3. Other Paving = .07
4. Green Area = 1.67
Tot. Project Area (ac) = 1.8
II. Water Quality Calculations
1. Compute 1st inch of runoff over total area:
1 in. X Total Area/12 = .15
2. Compute 2.5 in. x Percent Impervious:
Site Area for WG = Total-Roofs-Lakes
Impervious Area for WQ = Site-Pervious
Percentage of Imperviousness for WQ
2.5 in. x Percent Imp. x (Total-Lakes)/12 =
= 1.74
= 7.000005E-02
= 4.022992E-02
1.508622E-02
3. Required Water Quality Wet Detention Vol (ac-ft) = .15
4. Required Dry Detention Volume equals .75 times Required
Wet Detention Volume (ac-ft) = .1125
5. Required Retention Volume equals .5 times Required
Wet Detention Volume (ac-ft) = .075
III. Soil Storage Calculations
1. Compute Pervious Area for Soil Storage
Total Pervious Area (acres) = 1.67
2. Compute Depth to Water Table
Depth to WSWT (ft) = Ave Site - WSWT = 14.5
3. Initial Soil Storage Extraction (in) = 14.68
4. Composite Site Soil Moisture Storage = Percent Pervious
times Compacted Soil Moisture Storage (in) = 13.61978
IV. Water Quantity Calculations
1. Parking Design Storm: 5-year,1-hour (in) = 3.2
Lowest Proposed Parking Lot Grate (ft-NGVD) = 26.5
Runoff from 5-year,1-hour storm (ac-ft) = CAR/12
C = .2505556
A = 1.8
R = 3.2
Q (5yr,1hr) = .1202667
2. Road Design Storm:
Minimum Road Crown
SCS Runoff Formula
Q (ac-ft) = Q (in)
24 Rainfall Amount (in) = 6.8
Elevation (ft-NGVD) = 15.4
Q (in) = (P-0.2S)^2/(P+0.8S)
x Total Project Area/12 =
Road Design Storm Runoff (ac~ft) = .140831
3. Project Design Storm: 24hr Rainfall (in) = 13
, 72hr Rainfall (in) = 17.667
Minimum Project Perimeter Elevation (ft-NGVD) = 15.2
Using SCS as in 2.; Design Storm Runoff (ac-ft) = 1.17265
4. Floor Design Storm: 100yr,24hr Rainfall (in) = 16.5
100yr,72hr Rainfall (in) = 22.4235
Minimum First Floor Elevation (ft-NGVD) = 34
Using SCS as in 2.; 100yr,72hr Runoff (ac-ft) = 1.747059
Olsak
''^''l
A~fA ':/I"
,.1?c:JI"t:1r6l) .
Date: 7-26-95
Olsak and Associates. Inc.
Surface Water Management Calculations
Project 10: St. Joseph's
1.
Proposed Acreages
1. Lakes = 0
2. Roofs = .2'1
3. Other Paving = .3
4. Green Area = 1.29
Tot. Project Area (ac) = 1.8
II. Water Quality Calculations
1. Compute 1st inch of runoff over total area:
1 in. X Total Area/12 = .15
2. Compute 2.5 in. x Percent Impervious:
Site Area for WQ = Total-Roofs-Lakes
Impervious Area for WQ = Site-Pervious
Percentage of Imperviousness for WQ
2.5 in. x Percent Imp. x (Total-Lakes)/12 =
= '1.59
= .3
= .1886792
7.07547'lE-02
3. Required Water Quality Wet Detention Vol (ac-ft) = .15
4. Required Dry Detention Volume equals .75 times Required
Wet Detention Volume (ac-ft) = .1125
5. Required Retention Volume equals .5 times Required
Wet Detention Volume (ac-ft) = .075
III. Soil Storage Calculations
1. Compute Pervious Area for Soil Storage
Total Pervious Area (acres) = 1.29
2. Compute Depth to Water Table
Depth to WSWT (ft) = Ave Site - WSWT = 24
3. Initial Soil Storage Extraction (in) = 14.68
4. Composite Site Soil Moisture Storage = Percent Pervious
times Compacted Soil Moisture Storage (in) = 10.52067
~'"
IV. Water Quantity Calculations
1. Parking Design Storm: 5-year,1-hour (in) = 3.2
Lowest Proposed Parking Lot Grate (ft-NGVD) = 26.5
Runoff from 5-year,1-hour storm (ac-ft) = CAR/12
C - .3983334
A = 1.8
R = 3.2
G (5yr,1hr) = .1912
2. Road Design Storm:
Minimum Road Crown
SCS Runoff Formula
G (ac-ft) = G (in)
24 Rainfall Amount (in) = 6.8
Elevation (ft-NGVD) = 15.2
G (in) = (P-0.2S)^2/(P+0.8S)
x Total Project Area/12 =
Road Design Storm Runoff (ac-ft) = .2173737
3. Project Design Storm: 24hr Rainfall (in) = 13
72hr Rainfall (in) = 17.667
Minimum Project Perimeter Elevation (ft-NGVD) = 15.4
Using SCS as in 2.; Design Storm Runoff (ac-ft) = 1.392849
4. Floor Design Storm: 100yr,24hr Rainfall (in) = 16.5
100yr,72hr Rainfall (in) = 22.4235
Minimum First Floor Elevation (ft-NGVD) = 34
Using SCS as in 2.; 100yr,72hr Runoff (ac-ft) = 2.008153
Olsak
R~'d -Iv be S"~~,I' ~H ,;ok :
t1 'fir II. /9/2 dF - ~ /~oZ - eJ.tJ7/tJ /9F
~'c dll'd 4~ s,4~ 1'# ~~ t!!!,J'rlp,eI~~ s:-yd'6~'.
(Std. Eq.)
OLSAK AND ASSOCIATES
Exfiltration Trench System Calculations
Based on South Florida Water Management District
Management and Storage of Surface Waters;
Volume IV, June,1987 Edition
1. Percolation Test Results:
k = .0002
2. EXFILTRATION TRENCH LENGTH CALCULATION
V
L = --------------------------------------------
k*(H2*W+2*H2*DU-DU^2+2*H2*DS)+(1.39E-4*W*DU)
. Note: If saturated trench depth is greater than the
un-saturated trench depth or the trench width
is greater than twice the trench depth use:
V
(Consev. Eq.) L = ---------------------------------------
k*(2*H2*DU-DU^2+2*H2*DS)+(1.39E-4*W*DU)
k Hydraulic Conductivity(cfs/ft^2-ft>head)
V Volume Treated (ac-in)
H2 Depth to Water Table (ft)
W Trench Width (ft)
DU Un-Saturated Trench Depth (ft)
DS Saturated Trench Depth (ft)
Results:
SFWMD REQUIRED LENGTH OF TRENCH
LENGTH OF EXFILTRATION TRENCH PROVIDED
VOLUME OF TREATMENT PROVIDED IN TRENCH
I
(ft) =
(ft) =
(ac-ft) =
..e~.~
7-26-95
St. Joseph's
~G.D'
,
~/8' ~..
~/.O'
6'
ryr/CA~ SE'CT/ON.
~, ...
= .0002
= .852
= 5,.4
= 6
= 4
= 0
55.84689
100
.1271333
Sta.'.;Je
Stora.ge Comp~ta.tions
----------------------.------
----------------------------
.3 ac '1.'18 ac . "11 ac
Stage Park Green Play Total
Feet Storage Stora'3e Storage Storage
NGVD ac-ft ac-ft ac-ft ac-ft
"'''- * 34 *****
** ** *****
*** *** *****
**** **** .Ji.****
***** 26.5 ***** 15.4 ***** 32.3
'15.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
'16.50 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.04
17.50 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.14
18.50 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.30
19.50 0.00 0.53 0.00 0.53
20.50 0.00 0.83 0.00 0.83
21.50 0.00 1. '18 0.00 1.18
22.50 0.00 '1.60 0.00 '1.60
23.50 0.00 2.08 0.00 2.08
24.50 0.00 2.63 0.00 2.63
25.50 0.00 3.24 0.00 3.24
26,50 0.00 3.9'1 0.00 3.91
27.50 0.03 4.64 0.00 4.67
28.50 0.1'1 5.44 0.00 5.55
29.50 0.25 6.31 0.00 6.56
30.50 0.44 7.23 0.00 7.67
31.50 0.68 8.22 0.00 8.90
32.50 0.98 9.28 0.02 10.28
33.50 1.28 10.39 0.13 1 '1.80
34.50 1.58 '11.56 0.24 13.38
35.50 1.88 '12.74 0.35 14.97
Sta.ge vs Stora.ge
================
Stage
ft-NGVD
35.50 I
34.50 I
33.50 I
32.50 I
31 . 50 I
30.50 I
29.50 I
28.50 I
27.50 I
26.50 I
25.50 I
24.50 I
23.50 I
22.50 I ,
21 . 50 I ,.
20.50 I
19.50 I
'18,50 1*
17.50 *
'16.50 *
15.50 *=
o
~ ~
~ ~
~ i,
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*/
r/
_________,_ ---"-.--_0_-
I(J(J
YEI9~
rro,eH.
24' NPMA srr)flO~
=+======+======+======+======+======+======+======+======+=======
2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5 25
Storage (acre-feet)
. . ~ . . ~.. , . . . . ~ ~.. . . . . : . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
,AR-Z0-94 WED 16:SS
J4'KAS~l- ~NGI
1Z0HIB
aIENT: Milord Development
CONTRAcrOR= Cllent
SITE: St. Joseph's Episcopal Ch
I :.. II "
: "I"'!' " ,
WATBRTAlLB
(Ill,", dllII "'" .~~) 'i
",.. ."
~..,:.
'. 0
"; I I .1 I ,.';"
cl
HI--
.bow. ....IS'
82'.
Os
SL. lilt... PrClpOMld IMOtl bGaom
t 1 Time In .CICCI"
12 TIm. In leconclt
K. H)'dftllllt ""ldw'~ (CISISP. n. H!AD)
eK. ".Ia(H1JH2)
(2Hl + 2M2....0' + 4)-<&2-&1)
.. HI 1M HI ... INIId on
....,h'lltove "'e ......m.
Copies to:
Client · 3
.~ I
. ......-..............
P.02
AND "ESTING, INC.
FLORIDA 3S4S1
R~
~:,
C C.UCTIVlTY
DATB:
~ JOBl:
and *1, Detray Beacb
Match 30, 1994
J4209
TEST 2 1BST 3
Oo~~ .. 0.56 0.56
5.'0 5.50 5.SO
.81 .98 1.27
~---
0.0 0.0 0.0
........
5.5 PT ~.S FI' BO. 5JPTBG.
0.0 0.0 0.0
360 360 360
2.26 X 1.99 X 1~ 1.62 X 10-' 2.0 X lu4
"
'r
AI?CA "B" ~
..
11:!1 '~"
.. OIl..
~J~g
~i !;
II~"
JI~!
.. I:
B..~
l' is"
..-
0~-0
.
.. ~.. -
~ \ ~~
.. .. ..~
::-~- -~-=-.=.==-=--
.
. t"
-.,~s EA
""
.... 1"
'.f'
nO.
i~
..i
.
'-t~
I
t I.
"
[
~~
~ !:.f..
.~.. .". -'.-...
_.. 4...... ___ - -.';' ~......
,.
-" ~
("" \.:
'"'t.
-A ~, .
(
.
-:.
.~
t
.
~,
... .
CR EST
-- - .
~~ .OULEVA~~O
:>i':?-,~ ~ ~~-:';:;;;;;;i?~;;;'i's'=-~~;;;;l
. _. '. ..,_.._ .2fl!,_~~h _..~.__._-_.'-_... .' .
h . ".
/lieFAI- B
IIF Jt'~ r 1'7N~
.
Date: 7-26-95
Olsak and Associates. Inc.
Surface Water Management Calculations
Project 10: St. Joseph's
I.
Proposed Acreages
'1 . Lakes = 0
2. Roofs = .37
3. Other Paving = .81
4. Green Area = 2.24
Tot. Project Area (ac) = 3.42
II. Water Quality Calculations
1. Compute 1st inch of runoff over total area:
1 in. X Total Area/12 = .285
2. Compute 2.5 in. x Percent Impervious:
Site Area for WQ = Total-Roofs-Lakes
Impervious Area for WG = Site-Pervious
Percentage of Imperviousness for WQ
2.5 in. x Percent Imp. x (Total-Lakes)/12
= 3.05
= .81
= .2655738
= . '1892213
3. Required Water Quality Wet Detention Vol (ac-ft) = .285
4. Required Dry Detention Volume equals .75 time~ Required
Wet Detention Volume (ac-ft) = .21375
5. Required Retention Volume equals .5 times Required
Wet Detention Volume (ac-ft) = .1425
III. Soil Storage Calculations
1. Compute Pervious Area for Soil Storage
Total Pervious Area (acres) = 2.24
2. Compute Depth to Water Table
Depth to WSWT (ft) = Ave Site - WSWT - 11
3. Initial Soil Storage Extraction (in) = 14.68
4. Composite S~te Soil Moisture Storage = Percent Pervious
times CompVcted Soil Moisture Storage (in) = 9.614972
IV. Water Quantity Calculations
1. Parking Design Storm: 5-year,1-hour (in) = 3.2
Lowest Proposed Parking Lot Grate (f~-NGVD) = 17.5
Runoff from 5-year,1-hour storm (ac-ft) = CAR/12
C = .44'15204
A = 3.42
R = 3.2
Q (5yr,1hr) = .4026667
2. Road Design Storm:
Minimum Road Crown
SCS Runoff Formula
Q (ac-ft) = Q (in)
24 Rainfall Amount (in) = 6.8
Elevation (ft-NGVD) = 17
Q (in) = (P-0.2S)^2/(P+0.8S)
x Total Project Area/12 =
Road Design Storm Runoff (ac-ft) = .4677607
3. Project Design Storm: 24hr Rainfall (in) = 13
72hr Rainfall (in) = 17.667
Minimum Project Perimeter Elevation (ft-NGVD) = 16
Using SCS as in 2.: Design Storm Runoff (ac-ft) = 2.785759
4. Floor Design Storm: 100yr,24hr Rainfall (in) = 16.5
100yr,72hr Rainfall (in) = 22.4235
Minimum First Floor Elevation (ft-NGVD) = 24
Using SCS as in 2.; 100yr,72hr Runoff (ac-ft) = 3.977262
Olsak
A~FA ~"
,.~ortDse.p
.
Date: 7-26-95
Olsak and Associates, Inc.
Surface Water Management Calculations
Project 1D: St. Joseph's
1.
Proposed Acreages
1 . Lakes = 0
2. Roofs = .37
3. Other Pa....ing = .97
4. Green Area = 2.08
Tot. Project Area (ac) = 3.42
II. Water Quality Calculations
1. Compute 1st inch of runoff o....er total area:
1 in. X .Total Area/12 = .285
2. Compute 2.5 in. x Percent Imper....ious:
Site Area for WQ = Total-Roofs-Lakes
Imper....ious Area for WQ = Site-Per....ious
Percentage of Imper....iousness for WQ
2.5 in. x Percent Imp. x (Total-Lakesl/12
= 3.05
= .97
= .3180328
.2265983
3. Required Water Quality Wet Detention Vol (ac-ft) = .285
4. Required Dry Detention Volume equals .75 times Required
Wet Detention Volume (ac-ft) = .21375
5. Required Retention Volume equals .5 times Required
Wet Detention Volume (ac-ft) = .1425
III. Soil Storage Calculations
1. Compute Per....ious Area for Soil Storage
Total Pervious Area (acres) = 2.08
2. Compute Depth to Water Table
Depth to WSWT (ft) = A....e Site - WSWT = 11
3. Initial Soil Storage Extraction (in) = 14.68
4. Composite Site Soil Moisture Storage = Percent Pervious
times Compacted Soil Moisture Storage (in) = 8.928188
IV. Water Quantity Calculations
1. Parking Design Storm: 5-year,1-hour (in) = 3.2
Lowest Proposed Parking Lot Grate (ft-NGVD) = 17.5
Runoff from 5-year,1-hour storm (ac-ft) = CAR/12
e = .474269
A = 3.42
R = 3.2
Q (5yr,1hr) = .4325333
2. Road Design Storm:
Minimum Road Crown
8eS Runoff Formula
Q (ac-ft) = Q (in)
24 Rainfall Amount (in) = 6.8
Elevation (ft-NGVD) = 17
Q (in) = (P-O.2S)^2/(P+O.8S)
x Total Project Area/12 =
Road Design Storm Runoff (ac-ft) = .5139657
3. Project Design Storm: 24hr Rainfall (in) = 13
72hr Rainfall (in) = 17.667
Minimum Project Perimeter Elevation (ft-NGVD) = 16.5
Using ses as in 2.; Design Storm Runoff (ac-ft) = 2.897354
4. Floor Desi',;jn Storm: 100yr,24hr Rainfall (in) -. '16.5
100yr,72hr Rainfall (in) = 22.4235
Minimum First Floor Elevation (ft-NGVD) = 24
Using SCS as in 2.; 100yr,72hr Runoff (ac-ft) = 4.105641
Olsak
Ne?rE :
~rfr'" e:?"S'~h~ c:rdd/,t;C:J~~/ tR-==- ~ -t3'J - tJI. to.s ':: d.P1 /IF:
Th/S C?,nIf)~<</w.6<. ~r'E'd"~ P/I?~O&!~ s:~r
t::h4'd' d'UI~~ /k~ er/r~'#f7 eK'r/f7y~.n,~ sy"t!1i4'
Ca/,~dr a'e'7?n.4' ~,. t7"hr~~CA..J
Stage
Storage Computat~ons
-------------------------------
----------------------------
Stage
Feet
NGVD
.97 ae
Tenn
Stora'Je
ac-ft
2.08 ac
Green
Storage
ac-ft
Total
Storage
ac-ft
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
* 27
**
***
****
17.5 ***** 14.5
14.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
15.50 0.00 0.08 0.08
16.50 0.00 0.33 0.33
'17.50 0.00 0.75 0.75
18.50 - 0.97 1.33 2.30
19.50 ~ 1.94 2.08 4.02
20.50 2.91 3.00 5.9'1
21 . 50 3.88 4.08 7.96
22.50 4.85 5.32 10.17
23.50 5.82 6.74 '12.56
24.50 6.79 8.32 '15. '1 '1
25.50 7.76 10.07 '17.83
. 26. 50 8.73 11.98 20 . 7'1
27.50 9.70 14.04 23.74
Stage
~/H. F.uPcJlC IE'~.
vs Storage
----------------
----------------
Stage
ft-NGVD
27.50 1
26.50 1
25.50 1
24.50 1
23.50 1
22.50 1
21.50 1
20.50 1
19.50 1
18.50 1
17.50
16.50 LJ
15.50
14.50 *=
0
'"
~
~
*
*
*
*
*~
~ ----
I~ 'fElt-it .~"''r.
I S .,.6A-~ ~r. (!";t ~ K 'IV~ J
====~~~==t=;======;~~====~~=====~~~~===~~=====~;:~===~~--=-=~~~~===~5
~I ~
~ Storage (acre-feet)
7. A. 8.
cOttDITIOHAL USE
ST. JOSEPH'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH AND SCHOOL
,
I'
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #94-158
CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL
STAFF REPORT
FOR
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
SUMMARY: st. Joseph's Church and School, owner, through its agent,
Chapin and Armstrong, is requesting approval of a conditional use
and major site plan modification to add as, 433 square foot
classroom building and a 13,272 square foot gymnasium to a
previously approved 14.68 acre church and school site. The
existing church and school is located and operating in zone R-1AAB,
single-family residential as approved by city Commission originally
in 1972 as a conditional use .and a 1988 expansion approved by the
City Commissi.on.
This request is being forwarded for review, consistent with Section
11.2 of Appendix A - Zoning and Chapter 4 of the Site Plan Review
Ordinance.
PROPOSED USE: The applicant is requesting to expand an existing
school by adding classrooms and gymnasium.
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: (See attached drawing)
Project name: st. Joseph's Episcopal Church and School
Applicant: st. Joseph's Episcopal Church
Agent: Chapin and Armstrong
Location: 3300 South Seacrest Boulevard
Land Use Plan Designation:
Low Density Residential (4.84
dwellings units per acre)
Zoning DeSignation: R-1AAB
Type of Use:
Church and School
Number of units: N/A
Square Footage: BUildings: 48,975 sq. ft.
(including proposed 18,705 sq. ft addition)
Site:
14.68 Acres
Proposed Development: Addition of 5,433 square feet of classroom
space and a 13,272 square feet gymnasium to a 639,490 square foot
church and school site. A landscape variance and a Board of
Adjustment variance for building height is concurrently being
processed and is considered separately.
I
Page 2
Planning and Zoning
memo #94-158
SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING (see attached location map):
The sUbject property is located in the R-1AAB, Single-Family
Residential, zoning district.
The following is a description of the land uses on the properties
that abut the subject site.
North R-1AAB existing, single-family neighborhood
East R-1AA several eXisting single-family houses;
Se.acrest Scrub to the north
South R-1AA undeveloped scrub land
West R-1AAB existing, single-family neighborhood
STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING CONDITIONAL USES: Section 11.2 D of the
Zoning Code contains the following standards to which conditional
uses are required to conform. Following each of these standards is
the Planning and Zoning Department's evaluation of the application
as it pertains to the standards.
The Planning and Development Board and City Commission
shall consider only such conditional uses as are
authorized under the terms of these zoning regulations
and, in connection therewith, may grant conditional uses
absolutely or conditioned upon the conditions including,
but not limited to, the dedication of property for
streets, alleys, recreation space and sidewalks, as shall
be determined necessary for the protection of the
surrounding area and the citizens' general welfare, or
deny conditional uses when not in harmony with the intent
and purpose of this section. In evaluating an
application for conditional use, the Board and Commission
shall consider the effect of the proposed use on the
general health, safety and welfare of the community and
make written findings certifying that satisfactory
provision has been made concerning the following
standards, where applicable:
1. Ingress and egress to the subject property and
proposed structures thereon, with particular reference
to automobile and pedestrian safety and convenience,
traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire
or catastrophe.
The sit. has two (2), two-way driveways leading to the on-site
parking area. The driveways are located on Seacrest Boulevard
and Swinton Avenue. An on-site sidewalk is located adjacent
to the Seacrest Boulevard,. entrance access aisle to allow
pedestrian access to the project.
~
Page 3
Planning and Zoning
memo #94-158
2, Off-street parking and loading areas where required, with
particular attention to the items in subsection I above,
and the economic, glare, noise, and odor effects the
conditional use will have on adjacent and nearby properties,
and the city as a whole.
As part of the 1988 expansion approval, a shared parking
allocation was approved. By code, the various principal uses
on site would require 265 parking spaces as follows: church-
75 spaces, existing school - 24 spaces, new classrooms - 12
spaces, parish hall - 44 spaces, fellowship hall - 44 spaces,
and new gymnasium - 133. The 1988 shared parking study has
been revised to include the new schedule (day and time) of
religious and non-religious activities and the new enrollment
(limited to 225 students and 28 staff). The study indicates
that the church sanctuary is primarily used for services on
sundays and that the school operates on weekdays. Certain
other ancillary uses occur on Saturdays and weekdays, during
the daytime and evening hours.
The most significant difference in the new study results from
the gymnasium construction and its anticipated activities.
The peak parking demand will occur during use of the gymnasium
for games. Since there is no overlap of this use with other
activities, and therefore no buffer calculation required,
staff has determined that the minimum number of parking spaces
required is 133. The 133 parking spaces is the number of
spaces shown on the previous site plan modification in 1988.
The majority of the parking spaces are located interior to the
perimeter of the property, therefore not causing an adverse
effect on adjacent properties regarding noise, glare and odor.
3. Refuse and service areas, With particular reference to the
items in subsection I and 2 above.
Three parking spaces interfere with the proposed dumpster
location and mus~ be moved to accommodate the turning radius
of the dumpster truck.
4. utilities, with reference to locations, availability, and
compatibility.
There are no utility concerns with the proposed new
construction.
5. Screening, buffering and landscaping with reference to
type, dimensions, and character.
A landscape variance is being requested of the Board for a
portion of the required vehicle use area screening (see
separate staff report). The majority of the landscaping shown
on their landscape plan is existing. New trees and hedges are
proposed for the perimeter of the gymnasium and new classroom
building. ~
6. Signs, and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to
glare, traffic safety, economic effect, and compatibility
and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties.
Additional parking lighting is not anticipated to conflict
with neighborhood harmony.
~
Page 4
Planning and Zoning
memo #94-158
7. Required setbacks and other open spaces.
There are no problems with setback or open space requirements.
8. General compatibility with adjacent properties, and
other property in the zoning district.
The existing facility has not generated adverse comments. The
addition is not expected to change compatibility with adjacent
properties.
9. Height of buildings and structures, with reference to
compatibility and harmony to adjacent and nearby properties,
and the city as a whole.
A Board of Adjustment variance is being requested for an
additional six feet in building height in connection with the
new gymnasium and is scheduled to be heard June 20, 1994.
10. Economic effects on adjacent and nearby properties, and
the city as a whole.
No additional effect is foreseen.
11. Conformance to the standards and requirements which apply
to site plans, as set forth in Chapter 19, Article II of the
City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. (New Chapter 4 Slte
Plan Review) .
Comliance of permit drawings with the attached staff comments
will provide conformance to the above-referenced requirements.
12. Compliance with, and abatement of nuisances and hazards
in accordance with the performance standards section 4 of
the zoning regulations; also, conformance to the City of
Boynton Beach Noise Control Ordinance.
No additional effect is foreseen.
requirements.
Existing situation meets
,
REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
Below is a list of those Departments that have comments regarding
this request.
DEPARTMENT
ATTACHED MEMORANDUM
Public Works
utilities
Fire
Police
Engineering
Memorandum #94-143
Memorandum #94-158
No Comment
No Comment
Memorandum #94-114 and
Memorandum #94-146
Memorandum #94-117
No Comment
Memorandum #94-196
Memorandum June 7,1994
Building
Parks and Recreation
Forester/Environmentalist
Planning and Zoning
The Public Works and Planning and Zoning comments regarding parking
and curbing must be addressed on the permit set of drawings.
Similarly, Engineering's comments regarding right-of-way, utility's
comments regarding public health approval, and the Forester's
comments regarding tree replacement can be addressed on the permit
drawings. Planning and Zoning comments regarding landscaping are
also subject to a variance approval or compliance with code. The
BUilding Department comments regarding height of building are the
subject of the Board of Adjustment variance requested.
4-
Page 5
Planning and Zoning
memo #94-158
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Department recommends approval of this
conditional use and site plan request, subject to the permit plans
for the proj ect being amended to show compliance with staff
comments and the applicable City of Boynton Beach Code of
Ordinances.
a:memo94.158
A:COND-USI...D
,
,.
5'
. tH1Hn ~~\ \~ r~'~' ~
. U.t- ,~tt~.~\.,t ~
~'\\l:\\:.~~\\~,~,1 ~'~~1\
,\\\\~\\'PWi\' '~~~ ! }:\ \
_\ ~,~ ~ & ~ ~ ""t ~ I: It >
, _ \ ~ "i P t..~ t!.
\\. ,,11 \. ',-
~ . \~\ \ \ t \
'W!HW\\\\H\ '@ i i \
~ \\\~\tlt\\~\l\\~\t ~;,
-. \,~\ ~\ \ r\~
\ ~ \
ij i
:.... 'I \
o "
Cf)
tB
:c
-
Cf)
()
.".
-' '
\
0.1
~
~"
t l
~
. "~
&
\ ~
~
\j
\'
. ..
, It
t r.....-.
..'
.,
,
\
----.
t\U
.
~
j
t
'i ~
~ ~~
- ~
~\ -;
(j ~ ~,'
~~ ~
~,
\
\
\,
~.
~
I:.
:>
(p
III
..
...
'"
..
r-
~
,
,.'1 It II lilt
_____ ,...,"10"
~~-----_.
-----------
. \' _ /rr~,
.~' '\ .I .'\i~\ ~
. ~. ~'1~
.. \\ -I fl1-
.. . ~\
. ~\<. ,"
\'
o
\. " CIl
\ \' '\' 1-
, \~\\".-\
\ \ . i\ eft
\\ \ \ ~\
, \,\ \\ ~t
\ \'~, ."
\ \' \
../
-
"
~
t
\
\
,
...~...."- \\ \
..-, .
l \'\\\ \\\~\~\\n .
\ \ \j \\\\\\r\'\ \
~ \ \ \\ ~' l t
\ I S.\ ,.
, \ \.
I ..
, \\ \ ~~
~~\ \~\\,\\\\\ \
~ ~; '.l'......t
\h ,,~..,,"'~~,,",..
u, ~
\~, \
~ \ .
----=-----=---
a
l\
\~
\\
\~
t..
:.~ ~'~\
. ~ -.:t.
~: ~l\
~l ~,l
'1\ \\t
...
t ~
'.
.OIl~.",.f1.
~
i
~
0'" ~f11.1
~~ YM~\\\~\\\\
\Il ~\ \ ~ \ \
~~ \ \
i · .~J ......~
,
\\\ \
s \
\\\
I
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM '94-143
j
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Carel Fisher, Deputy Public Works Director
DATE:
May 18, 1994
SUBJECT:
RE:
Site Plan Review (2nd. Review)
St. Joseph's Episcopal Church & School:
After careful review of the attached site plans we determined that In order
for the planned Dumpster location to be acceptable, parking space numbers
65, 66, & 67 must be eliminated.
The calculated distance for the solid waste collection vehicle to maneuver
would be restricted with vehicles parked in these spaces, thereby creating
a potential hazard.
I f this can be done, we recommend approval, otherwise the existing cond-
ition is unacceptable.
Thank You,
m rnow~ 00
tJ~v I Q i:' ":' .
.. PlANNING AND
. ZONING OEPT
.
CC: Files;
,
~
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-146
TO:
Tambri Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
J
FROM:
Vincent A. Finizio
Deputy City Engineer
DATE:
May 17, 1994
RE:
Technical Review Commi~~ee Commen~s
s~. Joseph's Episcopal Church' School
Planning Depar~ment File No. COUS 94-002
The Engineering Department is in receipt of the amended site plan
submittal for the above referenced development and herein advises
you of the following:
1. The applicant, pursuant to Engineering Department Memorandum
No. 94-114, dated April 19, 1994 (previously provided to you),
has complied with comments #1 thru #8, however, comment #9 is
not yet resolved.
The Engineering Department does not object to this plan being moved
forward to the reviewing City Boards conditioned on the resolution
of staff comment #9 and the correction of all code deficiencies
during time of Building Department permit review.
Should you require any additional information or assistance, please
contact the undersigned at ext. 6282.
VAF/ck
C:STJOSEPH.TRC
xc: Ron W. Last, P.E., City Engineer (as directed)
City Manager
,
q
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-114
TO:
Tambri Heyden
Acting Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Vincent A. Finizio
Deputy City Engineer
April 19, 1994
DATE:
RE:
Technical Review Committee Comments
St. Joseph's Episcopal Church and School
Planning Department File Ho. 94-002
The Engineering Department is in receipt of the above referenced
plans and herein offers the following staff comments:
1. The applicant shall clarify plan sheet No. C-2 by providing
additional grading details at the parking lot exit to assure
storm water runoff will reach CB-l and not flood the parking
lot.
2. The proposed sidewalk at the driveway west of the classroom
shall be a minimum thickness of 6".
3. Relocate sanitary service cleanouts from the swale area.
4. Pursuant to City codes, all swales shall be sodded and fully
irrigated. The apparent slope at south property line is 5%
plus or minus, please clarify.
Is CB-3 to be constructed over existing 15" pipe?
provide details and information.
6. On plan sheet C-3 delete the note pertaining to Linton Blvd.
Please
5.
7.
Drainage notes should
specification standards.
refer to the latest
Clarify plan sheet C-3.
F.D.O.T.
8. Please provide an explanation as to why, on plan sheet C-3,
there is a 45 degree bend downward in the storm pipe.
9. Please explain how site lighting, reference the removal of the
existing light poles, will be compensated for, ie. additional
lighting?
As the City's site plan review process is conceptual, the
aforementioned comments are herein provided to the applicant in
order to assist ~hem in moving their project ahead of schedule.
These items may be address during the site plan approval process or
during the permit review process.
The Engineering Department does not object to this plan moving
forward to the reviewing boards.
A~
Vincent A. Finizio
Deputy City Enginee
VAF:RWL/ck
C:STJOSEPH.TRC
~ u.).l~~-L.
Ron W. Last \
City Engineer~~
J{)
m
J.\IJH I 9 Iqq4
m
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 94-117
May 18, 1994
,j
From:
Tambri J. Heyden, Planning &lon.ng
Don Jaeger, Building Official
Al Newbold, Deputy Building ficial
Director
To:
Via:
Re: TRC COMMENTS
St. Joseph's Episcopal Church & School
The Building Department has reviewed the above plans and
recommend that the Planning Department establish the average
grade, and the building height should be a maximum of 25 Feet
above the establ~.shed grade in compliance with applicable code.
~
,.I /~ ~/ '
,...... ~ '
Al Newbol"'d
AN: mh
NAY I 0 ;994
00
,
i
.1;"1..:0-
A:STJOSEPH.TRC
II
I
MEMORANDUM
Utilities #94-158
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden.
Planning & Zoning
FROM:
John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilities
DATE:
Ma y 19. 1994
SUBJECT:
St. Joseph's Episcopal Church and School
2nd Review
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the
following comments:
1. Palm Beach Health Unit permit may be required, Sec.
26.12. Utility Department concerns will be addressed
at that time.
It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review
process.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact
Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404.
19b
Attachments
xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor
Peter Mazzella
File
m
MAY ? (, i()a~
00
..
,
/^
~CREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM '94-196
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
RE:
St. Joseph's Episcopal Church
~~
& School Site Plan
J
FROM:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
DATE:
May 20, 1994
The applicant should include a statement on the landscape plan to
remove or replace any existing trees as part of the project.
KH: ad
,
"
/3
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
Tambri Heyden
Planning & zoning Director
Michael E. Ha~~~~
Zoning and Site D~opment
June 7, 1994
Administrator
TO:
FROM:
Project:
Location:
Agent:
File No:
site Plan Review - 2nd Review - Conditional Use/Major
Site Plan Modification
st. Joseph's school Addition
3300 S. Seacrest Boulevard
Chapin an4 Armstrong
COUS 94-002
RE:
The following is a list of comments regarding the second review of
the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments
are divided into two (2) categories:
The first category is a list of comments that identify unresolved
comments either from the first review or new comments as a result
of the second review. To show compliance with these comments will
not substantially alter the configuration of the site and the
design of the building.
The second category is a list of recommendations I believe will
enhance the aesthetics and function of the project.
All comments and recommendations can be rectified on the plans at
time of permitting considering that the site plan request is
approved. The applicant must understand that additional comments
may be generated upon review of the documents and working drawings
submitted to the Building Department for permits for the proposed
project.
I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS:
,
1. Adding buildings to the site activates the requirement to
up-grade the existing vehicle use area/parking area to
comply with the required improvements specified in the
Parking Lot Ordinance. Modify the site plan, landscape
plan and paving and drainage plan to comply with the
following:
a) Correct the inconsistency between the
landscape plan, site plan and paving and
drainage plan regarding location of curbing,
type and count of parking spaces and
configuration of the area around the dumpster
enclosure.
b) The layout of the parking area west of the
gymnasium shalLbe reconfigured to comply with
the unobstructed 18 foot access distance
specified in the code. Compliance may result
in the required parking spaces identified as
numbers 73, 104, 120 and 121 to be relocated.
c) Specify on the site plan, the correct width of
the access aisles located at the north and
south end of the parking area west of the
gymnasium. Note, omitting the north access
aisle will allow a better flow of traffic.
/Lj
page 2
st. Joseph's School
2nd site Plan Review
d) place the following note on the site plan:
Seal coat and restripe the parking area west
of the gymnasium.
e) specify on the site plan, the required back-up
space for the parking spaces located north of
the gymnasium.
f) Place the following note on the site plan:
Seal coat and restripe the parking area north
of the gymnasium.
g) omit the compact parking space shown on the
striping deta:i:l drawing. Modify the detail
! drawing to comply with city standards.
h) Show on the site plan, the location of all
wheelstops.
i) On the site plan, dimension the size of a
regular and handicapped parking space.
j) Show on the site plan or paving and drainage
plan, the traffic control pavement markings
and signage.
k) On the site plan, specify the degree of all
diagonal parking spaces.
1) On the site plan, dimension the correct back-
up space and aisle width for the parking area
located north and east of the residence.
m) specify on the site plan, the correct back-up
space for the parking spaces identified as
numbers 60, 61 and 62.
n) The following required parking spaces
identifted as numbers 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68,
69, 70, 71 and 72 do not comply with required
design standards and shall be relocated.
0) Show on the site plan, the correct
configuration for each handicapped parking
space. Show no less than the required number
of handicapped parking spaces.
2. Based on the peak parking demand identified in the shared
parking study, a total of 133 parking spaces are required
for the project. Show and chronologically number no less
than 133 parking spaces in compliance with the parking
lot design standards. Also, show the 133 parking spaces
on the landscape plan and pavinCiJ and drainaCiJe plan.
Sometime since issuing the permits to construct the
improvements shown on the site plan approved in 1988,
(see Exhibit "An), the parking layout changed. The
diagonal parking north of the gymnasium with 30 approved
spaces, now contains 19 spaces with the extra spaces
distributed throughout the site. The location of the
spaces violates city design standards which will require
the spaces to be relocated. These required spaces are
identified in comment number 1(n) above. It is
recommended that the existing parking area north of the
gymnasium be reconstructed to accommodate the required
number of parking spaces.
/5
Page 3
st. Joseph's School
2nd Site Plan Review
3. Change the parking data on the site plan to indicate the
required parking for the multi-use gymnasium as one (1)
parking space per one hundred (100) square feet of gross
floor area. Also, place a distinguishable symbol next to
the 133 required parking count that indicates the 133
parking spaces are required for the project based on the
shared parking study. Add to the parking data, two (2)
parking spaces required and provided for the residence.
4. Where applicable, modify the parking data on the site
plan to coincide with the data identified in the shared
parking study.
5. Specify on the plan; the color of the dumpster enclosure.
6. Add the proposed fencing shown on the landscape plan to
the site plan and specify the height and type.
7. Place the finish grade elevations identified on the
elevation view drawings on the paving and drainage
drawings. Indicate the elevations as finish grade.
8. Add to the legend on the site plan, the floor area of the
second floor of the gymnasium.
9. A variance from certain landscape screening, required by
the code, is being requested by the owner. This variance
must be approved or additional landscaping is required to
conform the site to code requirements and must be shown
on the permit plans.
10. A height variance is being requested by the owner to
permit the propos.d building hei9ht of the new gymnasium.
The variance must be approved or the gymnasium will have
to be redesigned.
,
II. RECOHHENDATION(S):
1. Enhance the entrance to the site by adding tree, hedge
and ground cover landscaping on both sides of each
driveway.
2. To lessen the impact of the 35 foot tall wall on the ..at
.14_ of the gymna.ium, inoorporate additional mid size
and tall trees or palms adjacent to the east side of the
building.
NOTE: If recommendations are approved, incorporate them into the
working drawings required for permits for the project.
MEH/jj
A: SPREVSTJ . 2ND
A:SPREVIEW.2ND
/G
EXHIBIT "A"
S1: JOSEPH'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH
FELLOWSHIP HALL
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
...,.. ....
. - ..:-~ ,"46 :
z..
:t
t
!
r
HI f
~
, ~.
- I
- ,
~. ----:~.".c-rl< 11!1f- I~III .~'
; 1,~la
i e ~ :'1"1' Ii' !l PI
i ~ fa I !lll d
~ ..1 2.11
i!-. --,1...L ii, " I "
!~~II' ~F "~
=ii ! ~:-:'---- ,/
:111 "\. ifL\f; : r ill
I!t.... 'r!:::!!:'---' .,
....-. "
;..w - ----- ' 'J
~~\(! W ~ ~~
.,...~ .~
!,... ..~,,'" I"
~! ~.
1,:
...
"
....
co
OJ
OJ
)>
"'C
'I "'C
:0
\ ~ I
t
Ii : i m
I !,l I C
~J
! (J)
I I -
. ....
.
~ 'I m
, "'C
I >
z
~~I
::H
Jl~'"
, ;&-
;-a
~l
~!i
'i"
, :r_.l
I::w1l:
lit
.""~~
fll;;
.~~
!!!
t.:P
f~
II
".
'I
"
t~
$z
I.
I ._
V
-
... c..". ......
RlI~1 .-......
'-
(, ~ d ( ..PM&..... -
H
lr
..5'lIlfRJ:f) f.AR f.:~...v( 5fA~Pc.~A~A'r
FELLOWSHIP HALL H p~~.9.'?'!c..~b~.I~AIA 1."
/1
~~.J3~H~LlJ~vjl/ ~Ji<<?n'~~~&~:'g.' ,-~l _.,~ '--'lE:
lrt 63.- ~ . 'Ijj/ E ttJ ,-I-- \ · .~.,I · ~'~ 1.3..iI Tl :F"
.1, 1 ~ ~\ llUr~ fJ~'- : ;' r;/h I T \ ffi ~~ - j, ~. 1 r- I! I lOIl:!'L
In, ' 'If 11 ; 1_ e-- .,!::=--, IJ T n'l 'fk 'Ii'~
. Tl1TI1l', : R I 0 r\ ~r l' :'
'.' _ ~ :1' ~u l~ ~I-' ....._ ,- l- 7T ~vl 'I~J7r 1 1 1 .1.___
: ;=-f~Tll -1 ' e.... r/fiu ~ --fI~ ~E: ~ HO r- ./ \ . 11,1 H i.-I
. 'ill (I !if : qf~ R~~ - -~r- ~PIT~_L 'I ,,11\ I if'
.~: II ':: :~//, E": iwtlJ~t ,- '-.J: t)~ \ .:C.....
. . - ~ ~I- '. . --'.::' ; /'l/ml:..;!::....,... L2 Q:! ~ ~\ I , -r-ffiIr I'i.~
, .; :-- ,: ' HI' \I T -, II .' ,-t .." ': ' .- '", ......:
, I. ._,::: .TT1,lj(fl1J. i'." _:- ' Tf"" "" :...
s- -: ~J';,' {~ N ,T'I'lfllr-1 ; ,>-- --;. l:;" i - r 11 11' IT';o' ,
." .,___.::.__ ',I ~,-v..,. -1 \ 'I \1_\ \__. (~ ~ { , 1\11 t1~ :
_.-.-~ ..; / ~"." ,:':' - ~,
. ,', 'L03.l; :: {i nl!'/~~ T :t~ I ~\\lJLI- 'd: ; lrJ'~1 ~~D~' I I JH i . r
, ,,,.,,_' , / / . I T\ I 0--"""- .. - ~ r , r I
, . . , , J ~ II \1 [ 1-\+ ' \ I ~ rT ""1\ r-r--, r I l : I ·
__ __ ' " ' ,111 0 __ I ~ 1
. " -i ;. IJ' .:> ~;-'" Ij '--l' ; .
.. '.' ~ J R 1 >i_~"-' ---~.. Ii! -tf '-~" -I; ,:
~ :IJ" '\:. \ It ;, - - ",,:' - · ·
\ 1"1!~ a>~ ~.~'."'-'~t ': -' 3.!u' cU ~~~ T ~ Hi i ~ I
'J f/ f1j " l- _ yf' 'T'1f \I \ 1111 I' , '/:1 rnTr
~_ .1,' 10, / JI \ __ ~~" 1 \ ~ r:3 41 A. --.n. I ,.j ;.
tJ: 1;,'/ " _': r:r '-J T1 ," ~. -~- Rill: 1'4
;' r I ' I N ~.-'" '- 1 -\ I k :
:' I III I ~ '-:.;-' '. " - \- -- -- '
,J. l\ If-.... '- ,-- '- ·
I ~J ~/. ,- - .
I :' ,'1 I :f'"' I;rTT -- '-<. t.:;;; " d - ~~ i '-- ~ ---"'" .
.:: /h / Ii? -: .'-.rr7'~ 11, ,1 1 \I i ..-.?.::JI
~ ;"1. ,/;1.:- l~FLfI-n.l.g" -- · c"~1
:!~ I! r ~' fi''r.I~!.! Ii ~: - .- rt :i3 ~llll:TJ;j I L-- . "
- NOT
IN
t;,::, // ' < ::::--4:f< 'JIG. S TE ;,,,, ,';1[ i 'il ~ c,,..,. ..>:-di-.~'
'I," I.f ." f-L~fA'-1 f.;j~' ~l
. 11' -- -r T1 I 1 , · .. · '
/1 .- ~ l.......7~-... -- , . . _In ~,--, i
. .r;: --., .{J1-' (. ' I IF . [:::~[);'-: 1
.' 'I, 'v} :...:--, ' .. 'C- n '" f- U \lllT' 11\0:1 i
'~I!'.,/I \. ." / \.' \ ~ _ T,=lT~ I ~ r I f---
'I.. ~ - {1' "l0',,,,~, ~ L------1 i f
'1/ ~ ~_.'.'~) \,,'.' ',~ ~~', \ T I :
1 _, ,If,,~~~ii ~\, L- :. I
, I~ " " '
. 1 ~:.: ~ rL~~~~~lj _s:l::L ' II r f~ j ,
./ "', L il I I .1 _, rli@\bJ.------i
j v 0">-: ~J A'~C!tt'r"l,i(lr.J m,OO}m'~il~~i-W j ;t-=
. . .\ ,_, 'I :.J ~. l,"~""~ /.
" '_ .._ '- __ '-:: = " __ _ __ LllO --=: - -
__ Q "-'J; 'f-=J --' -=1"0 (- ~1' v,- :.L, ;1., I i ~,
~L - i 'I - - ,.-1 \= ' ~"j::J." -- ".-- -bl '.,;. ~ i I I I
LUCAT\ON M{,P
8T JOSEPH'S SCHOOL
\
..
I
.. 'r......,-.-
,',1\.; 1 r
.0 1/8 MILES
.\\ \ \ \ \ \ .
'0 400. '800 FEET
NOTE
/6
.6
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA
JUNE 21. 1994
Commissioner Aguila
tion of Railroad A n
comitant executio a utility easement large enough to acco te the
existing utilities. Commissioner Katz seconded the motion, which carried 4-0.
-
H.
Project Name:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Description:
St. Joseph's Episcopal CburQ and School Cev..s~4- t:JO?-
James A. Ballerano, Jr. "fi'k,
St. Joseph's Episcopal Church and School
3300 South Seacrest Boulevard
Conditional USI - Request for Conditional Use approval
of an expansion to include a new gymnasium and
classroom building.
'.
Ms. Heyden advised that this is a request for an amended conditional use approv-
al to construct a 5,433 square foot classroom building and a 13,722 square foot
gymnasium to the existing St. Joseph1's Episcopal Church and School. A revised
shared parking allocation is requested as part of this approval, based on a
staff of 2B, a future student body limited by restricted deed covenant to 225
students and a peak parking demand of 133 parking spaces during use Of the gym-
nasium for afterschool games. No net increase in parking is required; however,
some new parking and some redesigned parking is necessary to compensate for some
nonconfonming parking spaces which need to be removed. (There were some spaces
that were added since the last approval which do not meet current code.) The
site is located in a district that can be slated for either Modern or
Mediterranean. The building is a modern style and confonms with the design
district. Elevations were displ~yed on the easel. The Planning and Development
Board unanimously recommended approval of this request, subject to all staff
comnents.
Comniss1oner Katz asked if St. Joseph's has polled any of the residents in the
area to find out how they feel about this. Commissioner Aguila painted out that
a conditional use requires notices to be mailed to all residents within 400 feet
of the subject property. Ms. Heyden advised that she has not received any
objections.
Commissioner Aguila asked if the applicant is aware of staff comments.
Ms. Heyden answered in the aff1nmative.
- 20 -
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA
JUNE 21. 1994
James Ball.rano, the petitioner, confinmed that St. Joseph's Episcopal Church
and School is in agreement with all staff comments and thanked staff for their
diligent efforts with regard to this matter.
Commissioner Aguila expressed concern about some approvals that were gained in
1988 and some conditions of that approval not having been met. He asked for a
commitment from Mr. Ballerano to comply with all required comments prior to
being issued a CO for this building. Mr. Ballerano had no objection to this.
He explained that there had been some intervening recommendations from City
staff that have changed conditions from 1988 to as they exist presently, and
staff is asking us to go back to 1988 conditions. He understood this is also
preconditioned to getting a penmit.
Since no one in the audience wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to
this conditional use, Mayor Hanmening declared the public hearing closed.
Matton
Commissioner Aguila moved approval of the conditional use for St. Joseph's
Episcopal Church and School, subject to all staff comments. Commissioner Katz
seconded the motion, which carried 4-0.
VII. PUBLIC AUDIENCE
'..
None.
VIII. DEVELOPMENT PLANS
A. Consent Agenda - Unanimously Approved by Planning and Development
Board
1. Project Name:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Description:
St. Joseph's Episcopal Church and School
James A. Ballerano, Jr.
St. Joseph's Episcopal Church and School
3300 South Seacrest Boulevard
Landscape Appeal - Request for approval on appeal
to Section 7.5-3S(d) and (e) of the Landscape Code
regarding installing required vehicle use area
screening (hedges).
4l.
L.A-At' 94 - t
-hj
The Planning and Development Board unanimously recommended approval of this
landscape appeal, subject to staff comments.
Matton
Commissioner Aguila moved approval of St. Joseph's landscape appeal.
Commissioner Katz seconded the motion, which carried 4-0.
-
- 21 -