The URL can be used to link to this page

CORRESPONDENCE f ,,(1l_;~'-"""""'~'-"-"" ",'ljII.., " ..1,..".:"'.':'" ~"I!<"-,~<..>>." 'f-, '.""'0' ....l-.r,....~,"~ .:r~'.. .~ #>'\'Ii,.J""o -' ..'.... '.1 ~t ,~ijo!iIl!" ,..,~,~....-...,,'~ ," ,I,,,, ___......._".__1_.......,.. CORRESPONDENCE (Letters) TCR fD) rn @ rnJ_ w rn rnl ua[ ~E; ~J~I Pi .'''' '" ,r~ ,,-t-,{ \ ~,1- ~;" 70;'1: ,i~ ;;~?r i:II _"'M~~_ TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL 6400 Congress Avenue Suite 2000 Boca Raton, FL 334H7 (56 I ) 997 -970D FAX (56 I) 997 -HeA9 1_. September 9, 1997 VIA COURIER DELIVERY Ms, Tambri Heyden, Director Planning & Zoning Department City of Boynton Beach P,O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, PI 33425 Re: Vinings at Boynton Beach II - Fountain Variance Dear Tambri: Yesterday I was informed that we could not pull a permit for an above ground fountain because it was too large, Our approved site plan indicated a location of a fountain area which contained a 9' radius fountain, 4 decorative benches on a decorative pavement area, with Washingtonians and other perennial garden planting, This fountain was approved with a 9' radius, I received a fax of Chapter 2, Section 4.J, from an associate in your office. I don't know what section of the Code this falls under an cannot determine the context. Please help me understand why the City would want to limit the size of a privately owned, purchased and maintained fountain. We have designed a beautiful artistic structure--one that has been custom designed and ordered for this space, I have enclosed detailed drawings of the fountain and have enclosed a detailed section of Plan L-2 and L-5, Grading and Landscaping, respectively for this job, Please call me as soon as you are able to discuss this matter. I don't think this is worthy of a $400 variance, oject Partner cc: Alex Panzeri Tic. 9/10/97 Ii ir (:.:1- .... l!" -ti P '1! .,p ~~ I: ,,~ ~. ~ N , \Q 09/08/1997 15:57 561375&259 It F ~ ~ Ii f r ii!iljJ U !' 1 iilf(heJ i'S' I ~ ~ J~l! !-jI i J- i i t B 11;:1 it i Uinn ll~. D i ~- f W Q J t l . iHHU . ~ f i lIf M:! !I : f~!t ~ J'l~ l ill!1 r~ ! '1IhH if t -~!~ Ef ~ ~~ g, e w ill t f J if lEi' ~ s f. if -=0 ["Ii s ti .. iI' ~...... I!i !l ~e:~~lt~ Ei"~'l':~ !~ iF r.i ~ J ~ .t' 'I!!. ... g II s:r P 9- ilt!'l6~ "'..1111 (I i [ ~ i 'Bi.it i i t t D ~.!'l & . . a" n 'fl '< if' ~ g e' it IJi~~ ll'i! ~~f![ il~ ...~ IIQ,-,Rr BOYNTON BEACH ~& Z !" i I: In ~ i e It 1 i a e I R ~jJ l_irJl . ~ 0 I~ LIIQ H R' o _0 II 01> "" B ~ i=*" il~irll:i 6 ;:l'1 It QlI i:i I:l ~ ~~ igi: ........! i ..........UJ "t,,~L'a i!: t~iilf-l~ e H': a.1 ~ l ~ !4(!I....~t:t'g go a..i ~ a !- g "" sa:J:ElSi' 8' ~, E. i -5 8. e- '0\ 19:~1( S8 [';; J:, :s. -I"" - R ... ... .... s: ... r 8, f:~a' (I, Sl I i f if p ~ 1!1'" If!. ..R ....oF ~.ill ,I ft~ j ~ ... ~QlI !1 W C'i ~ ~ .. i, ~ ~ ~ ~!. [~ni G :-"' ~laJ!.o g ae.e;@ 11 '.....,tIl ~[[[: r ;- ~ r;r ;iJ ~Jt~~ l=lt~ I ~ Cl n-- . f ir ;i --.. tE' ~~i8's- 3 e-I'{~ It:!-a[ t~;I~: o ~ Il1I -0 Pt~:8lt ~. 0 -< ~ ~Ur ~. a a- ~ f.~ n g' i~lii ~J:~~ a.[q _0-0. ~o"2-G w=n"''U ~ ~~ g -8- - g- g PAGE 02 . !""" a;1 ;! g a. ~ h~ U it -sJ \)1 ~'1 ~ ~~ ~t> g.; q i i. 8" $!. 'i-: it S' ft. ~ go u ~l !l :i u..._..... ~. ....._..~-- if Ii ~! ~ 0-0 ~ ~ ~ :-.l .. - 0-0 (:; .. - l"" f'" : C) !l'~ .. [~ ~, Ei' ~ I r ~ I fgiFrl~ !~r;r ~Ii ~j ~ if !i 18n~ i[9~ a a: It it- a .P.g. I, r+ ~ a ~I -~I Ilia tB!l i1~a-8 o~ ~I Ip ! I ~ j~ . l;II 0 ~~ p .... g-'8 4 'S. a i ~!il ~r Sa S? I' If ~ ~'o i l~ ~ !l i tI 'l~i .. ~RIB.. I "ItA-I l "< r; ~ ~ ~ IT Utili glJ ~ ffg (; ~-:a.[ I B, '~'ff a'l i:~ 1- ! ~ I I:,sw=- a:::l ~o S I; I ailE <lR' a ~ ~ ;. i .. J a' tit,! O-Oia 1 ~l~ IIQ ill t;)1 "CI Ii 6 ~ hr~t i i~l.i~. fl8 - __O! a ~~ i g tit g ,ll!I P' if f7' -f~ Iii 8" ~ 1 [i N fi _nl~l o . f~i - {[ , I l~ st ~o ~ ~--l ;:0 a' llQ l-' ~~ "Ii- ~ Q Jl~. PoW 1,g.1f "-'51.!" I-o~ ~~a' '5.8:'& [. f I :0 iI' ~ !.~ ~. Iii" ~l' l\:a- [ ~iS' if S' s.~~,i" - ~ e.'g ~i~ I: 1,1 ii hI 0 II EO: 0' Ifoll [ . [I. f ~i' '0 - fi.... ~ :E: ...... ~llQi in.~ f !:I'Da' ! lrl'i ~, o.~ o P 0 II g"S ~fl, ;rIll ' ~r .~a.~ a- li~ ; I i1 i D :S_~ ;;. ~:n ~ 8 ~. R" listl !~i Il .....~ IT n ~.... a,-,g-~ El · ,-.. ~. CIe n 3{ 'oll~ ~ l R fi ~~ f'lj l~l~ j ~j. {tg-'" - ~M) j~ ~- III .... if ~ .J8 ~irt ... 1~ d r~ n a ~ po ~, !t~~l rf4Ji~ ~ It ~I-' ~lQ- '< .... .B - to B- o a l: ~. . e -g i~l B'3 go Q ~ f to': e. [ .... ~ en "1 !;alf o ~ 'Ij i~ ~~ i I" ~~G" i[ ft no 2. rtla, .. ... ~ G. <~~ \j- w z ::::i :r: u ti: ~ !\J n E \~ ~ \ ~D. ~g w ~ >.-l~ _ill [tJ) (J ()~ ~~7 0 L() t-'-:J cO -:+t -dJ[[~ ,... ~ ~ 00 \ ~I , :!{ ~I , ; ~; , - - - h'~ f- 3 U.O ZlJ.! -f- LUe) OLU ~-I C)~ ;iLU _a:l ~{2 LU a:: LU a. ~ ~ f -." -:;:;:: - -- T =~- - - ~ ~ [)/~ ~~~ "- E2 ~ a::z- V a: o ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ w u. ~ a. ~ .....c::: <~ ~ ~,.:,\~~ ~~i\ F~j~" ~ 4 j ~ rr I ~ r 'I l ~,~~ . Y0 ~ - 1,J i::;:,.,. ':' ~ t f.:.~\{K\ ~') r't' I ~J It ~ \; 'J ~~'J:' r--' ~~-t1""'1i '~1 ~ ~ ' CO .> / \'0.,' ^ . ~ -I ~~I~ / "";~~'x Ii" '3 '3 ~ LJ. I- ILhlIM. V /1'~ Jl.... C- /'E ~ f2 f2 ,,( ~:J . '.1m 1- l~.A) ,. ~ '" ~ < g Q 5 l~ ... i ~"!i 7 is! }-; oj ~~ ~ ~-_w < &; - ~ ~ ~ t;"r i '~ ~ a:r -d---~ :):s fJ - ~ ~ u5 ~ ~ a5 ~ ' C/)Q <-~~ ~ <l:: "" a: a: <l:: <( 0 <r ~ w <n ~ - =>w ~ ~ 0 , Wo 0 ~ <n 0 5 m~, Or- ~ za: Q) Q ~a: 0_ 5., " ~ "it '" - ^ " ;J :,' < <r => - ii' ~, w _ ';' .. ~ , - '< g 0 ~ 0 iJj '" 15 '" ,. '.TJi~- ...J '<r...... <r =i.b 0 <r z....... <n "'".... . . _ ,:.... 15 g...... : g ~ ~.; r 1 '.~ ~'t' i'lf1 ~ t;: &; ; g ~ it t=. 8 < >-..~ 4' '1-,', I ..... " W W "W i=" / ~~H '. ,,\\ :~ ~ ~ 0 0 I G g u. I) l~' ,. 'I'><"..-.r, ~/, /. ;; "'- ':' ; ~ ~ . '. .,(/ "" ~, ~. // III ~ n. t--. \) ....: '/" "S('-""~ . J..I ( $. F.'- 1'-i ""..' . ~~~~:. : I ~~ ~~ v -~. k' ~~ --f d:'~J~'.~ '\, .~ \~~ ~ ~ ..j\~:;; .~.d" ' '':-'..: . 1. '. . A; ~~ ~ '. I--.!.. ~ <, '.~ 1"-- C \ II ~ " ....., . .. ~. . . ". .' ,j v V J.... .... , ,V fi1~ . . . :'\. . . <, . I hi . . g,,@) ~, .r- ..,' tll'~" . . I_"""it ~I~: . . I( I ({~,) K ,~'::t 'If' . 'J : 1~ ~'---K If 1-1 "---"" ,7. . '. ~, " " / IJ I fJ ~ 1\ "- g,. - ~'- ^' , ,H If' . ~ Lu7i~~~y '~~\~ <::~~~;;;'l.z~./.: ~<':I,x ~ 'Y")~ .~_ ~ ._. K '~,)(A\~~v'>Lr".., ~y ~ I(~ .. .. T b' "i' ~ rt _~~~~~ ~ ' ~, '" . / . . V7 , , ~ ~ ~, , . t- . . f-<v. , ~"';1. /. \/1'- ::. to, (If' . .$'..... '{...... ,...."..<VI- /. I ':lL i, \...y , <.--, "'\. '., \. C- "II '. .. . . E* 'l: >;' ,.,.. If- l}- ,,:> 'i;;;U" >.-<-- ...., OrJJJ-r!A.::If/)':. ~ ~HIW "" ~T\ ~/'"'lll~J~~ ri~t~~~"i::, I g :~~ to ---- ("f7'" /'i '" ~ ::> is <r < is 1i' . I, ~ - ~. ,.' .:.~.~ 18~_'L i ~ ;i co i ~: ~\; J~ ~ ~ 'LI ~""'- ~:....t.~ - LL r r 0 r 0 w ~"' ~:'\'7':~ )ij ~ '< ;Z J; ii ~ '''~ W\]: . ~~~ ~j':::~= ~ ~~ - i: - ~).r\ . \1: ~ I ,:~ ~ --+- cS -- .-------- I I ~ ~ :) o -J -J W ~ :z ?:Tie City of 'Boynton 'Beacli 100 'E. 'Boynton 'Be.adt 'Boukvara P.O. 'B~310 'Boynton 'Be.adt, !Jfmi.4a33425-0310 City 9laff: (561) 375-6000 !J.9IX: (561) 375-6090 December 10,1997 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Merry Land & Investment Company, Inc. c/o Ms, Lori Rogers Hull, Towill, Norman and Barrett, P,C. 801 Broad Street, Seventh Floor Augusta, GA 30901 Re: Vinings at Boynton Beach - Phase II Dear Ms, Rogers: Please be advised that the property located at 100 New Lake Drive, Boynton Beach, is currently zoned Planned Unit Development, PUD, according to the Official Zoning Map for the City of Boynton Beach, Multi-family dwellings are a permitted use in the PUD zoning district according to the City of Boynton Beach Zoning Code. It is the intent of PUD zoning regulations, to promote and encourage development in this form where tracts suitable in size, location and character for the uses and structures proposed, are to be planned and developed as unified and coordinated units, If I can be of further assistance, please contact me. Sincerely, -- . ~/JrJ!' , ,~ I . v....i / (l.N,.'^:.';' u .. <' Tambri J. Heyden, AICP Planning and Zoning Director T JH:jbg S:\PLANNING\SHARED\WP\CORRESP\zONVARIFWININGS-1.DOC 5tmerUa's (jateway to tlU (julfstream LAW OFFICES HULL. TOWILL. NORMAN & BARRETT WM. HALE BARRETT LAWTON JORDAN. JR PATRICK J. RICE DOUGLAS D, BATCHELOR JR- DAVID E, HUDSON WILLIAM F HAMMOND MARK S, BUR GREEN" GEORGE R HALL" JAMES B, ELLINGTON F, MICHAEL TAYLOR" ROBERT A, MULLINS" WILLIAM J, KEOGH III EDWARD J, TARVER J, NOEL SCHWEERS III" SUSAN D. BARRETT R. E. HANNA. III-- TIMOTHY E, MOSES" N, SHANNON GENTRY TRACY T, KENTON" FRANK C. MC CRYSTLE III." CHARLES H, WEIGLE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ROBERT C, NORMAN iRETIREDJ P,O. BOX 15S4 JOHN BELL TOWILL 1907 -1991 AUGUSTA. GEORGIA 30903-1564 OFFICE November 26, 1997 SUNTRUST BANK BUILDING 801 BROAD STREET SEVENTH FLOOR AUGUSTA. GEORGIA 30901 TELEPHONE (70S) 722-4481 TELECOPIER (7061 722-9779 EMAIL HULLFIRM@GROUPZ.NET -IALSO FL AND S.C.1 ..'ALSO s.c.) ...(MO ONL YJ VT A FFDFR AT FXPR FSS. lih 1/17'i-h2hO CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 In Re: The Vinings II at Boynton Beach 100 New Lake Drive, Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida Real Estate Number: 08-43-45-29-28-001-0000 Dear Sir/Madam: Please accept this letter as our request for a zoning verification letter, Enclosed herewith please find a copy of the legal description of this property along with a copy of the 1997 proposed assessed values. Also enclosed please find our check in the amount of $25.00 to cover the fee for this request. Please send the zoning verification letter federal express using our firm account number as follows: 1063-4408-6. The address to send this letter is: Merry Land & Investment Company, Inc. cI 0 Ms. Lori M. Rogers Hull, Towill, Norman & Barrett, P. C. 801 Broad Street, Seventh Floor Augusta, GA 30901 Please fax a copy of the zoning verification letter to me prior to sending federal express, If you need any further information, or if I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your prompt response and cooperation. Sincerely, JfCH.-l- '~. k3~ Lori M. Rogers Legal Assistant Enclosure C:\OFFICE\ WPWIN\ WPDOCS\LMR \ TRAMMELL \ VININGS,Il 68.407/sDB 1997 PROPOSED AD VALOREM TAXES ~TROL NO. 08 - 43 - 45- 2 9 - 28- 0 0 1- 0 0 0 0 Al DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: NI~GS \T BOYNTON BEACH r L OF PLAT K/A PAR A TAXING AUTHOR IT" '3 COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS BY STATE LAW BY LOCAL BOARD . 0 01 . 0 01 . 0 01 r CITY SFWMD EVERGLADES CONST.PROJ. :m~f:~tpnt SptKi.a F.!.N.D. .00 .00 .00 CHILD SERV .00 HEALTH ~~.~_d O.bt COUNTY DEB SCHOOL DEB CITY DEBT TOTAL AD VALOREM 'PERTY TAXES h.. ,., ...m.....' .................~.... ........,.-..........-..,........,......... ...... .... ....... ..........-.....-......... I I r I 43236.8i .FOR DETAILS ON INDEPENDENT SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND VOTER I EE CR~wrN 3 APPROVED DEBT, CONTACT YOUR TAX COLLECTOR AT (5611 355-2264 SFOR EXPl:N~iloO: IF YOU FEEL THE MARKET VALUE OF YOUR PROPERTY IS INACCURATE OR DOES NOT REFLECT FAIR MARKET VALUE. CONTACT YOUR PROPERTY APPRAISER AT: Agrlcyllyre (561) 355.348~ CommercIal (561) 355-40~ Conrlomlnlym (561) 355.26~ Exempllons (561) 355.2866 ReSIdential (561) 355-2883 IF THE PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE IS UNABLE TO RESOLVE THE MATTER AS TO MARKET VALUE. YOU MAY FILE A PETITION. PETITION FORMS ARE AVAILABLE FROM THE COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE. YOUR PETITION MUST BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD ON OR BEFORE: 09/15/97 5:00 PM Tne lalClng authontles whICh levy proper;r talCes agalnsl your property WIll soon i nold PUBLIC HEARINGS 10 adopl DUdll and I:u.rales Tor Ihe ne><1 year Tne pU'llOse of tnese PUBLIC HEARIN ,10 ote opinions from Ine oeneral I'.," pYbhC and to answe, quesllons on the ~, _"oseo Change and DYdgel PI{IOR . TO TAKING FINAL ACTION, Eacn taXIng autnorily may AMEND OR ALTER its proposal at the heanng. t : il,oW~O~~\SE H~ub~~ I Cod. A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED , CHANCE IS MACE. TAXES AN" BUDGET WILL BE HELD: 8169.60 PALM BEACH COUNTY (561)355-2027~ 9/08 7:00PM 301 N OLIVE AVE 6TH FL f WEST PALM BEACH 33401 ~PBC SCHOOL BOARD (561)434-8259 '19/1 0 7: 00 PM 3346 FOR EST H ILL B L V 0 WEST PALM BEACH 33406 CITY OF BOYNTON BCH (561)375-6312 '19/04 6: 30 PM 10 0 E BOY NT 0 NBC H B L V 0 BOYNTON BEACH 33425 2 1104.67:.;.....'..'ISO FLA WATER MGT DIST (561)686-8800 5;:~:~; 9/ 1 0 5: 15 P M 3 3 0 1 GUN C L U B R 0 A 0 177.60' : WEST PALM BEACH 33406 88.80 FLA INLAND NAVIG DIST (561)627-3386 9/11 5:30PM 340 OCEAN DRIVE JUNO BEACH 33408 CHILDRENS SVC COUNCIL (561)655-1010 '9/11 6:00PM 1919 N FLAGLER DR WEST PALM BEACH 33407 PBC HEALTH CARE DIST (561)659-1270 9/09 5:01PM 324 DATURA ST SUITE 401 WEST PALM BEACH 33401 YOUR PROPERTY VALUE THIS YEAR 1776000 1776000 NONE 1776000 YOUR PROPERTY JALUE LAST YEAR MARKET VALUE ASSESSED VALUE NONE I "'MOno", TAXABLE VALUE GOVERNMENTAL CENTER - 5th FLOOR 301 N, OLIVE AVE. WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA 33401 AT 30t N. OLIVE AVENUE. WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA 3340t PAY THIS IS .~ NOT ,. A BILL YOUR TA~ES THIS YEAR IF NO BUDGE CHANCE IS ""AOE 7327.0 11431.2 4571.4 13821.7 983.9 172.2 65.7 649.6 :2077.9 473.4, 932.4: 730.1 d._.. ..__._... . .. - - - . . .. .. ... . . . . .. ........... .. . . ............ .. .:<::1997 PROPOSED NON~AD:VALOREMASSESSMENTS:: LEVYING AUTHORITY TELEPHONE HUI1BER lAST YEAR'S ASSESSED AI10UHT DRAINAGE DISTRICT MAINT'(561)737-38351 :E WORTH PROPOSED RATE I ASSESSED AI10UNT 31.05i 496.8! DO NOT PAY --- THIS IS NOT A BILL 1"11,"11"1..11..1.1,"1..1,11"1""1111,"11...11....1..11 08-43-45-29-28-001-0000 03 41 BOYNTON BEACH 2 LTD PARTNRSHIP 6400 CONGRESS AVE # 2000 BOCA RATON FL 33487-2810 08-43-45-29-28-001-0000 293432 SCHEDULE A OFFICE ALE NUMBER POLICY NUMBER DATE OF POLICY AMOUNT OF INSURANCE 2 3 4 Crow/Boynton II 10 2179 106 0000011 1, Name of Insured~ TCRPAD'VININGS AT BOYNTON BEACH II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Florida limited partnership 2. The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this Policy is: Fee Simple 3. Title to the estate or interest in the land is vested in the Insured. / 4. The land herein described is encumbered by the following mortgage or trust deed, and assignments: / I I See Addendum to Schedule B. \ and the mortgages or trust deeds, if any, shown in Schedule B hereof, 5, The land referred to in this Policy is described as follows: All of THE VININGS AT BOYNTON BEACH-PHASE II, P.U.D., according to the plat thereof,-recordedin Plat Book-78,Page 109, Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida. SCHEDULE A Owners Form Reorder Form No. 3529 (Rev, 1/89) This Policy valid only if Schedule B is attached. (' -, r ,--)Q~. 100 'E. f}Joynton f}Jeadi f}Jouhvara P.O. f}Jo~310 f}Joynton f}Jeadi, ~forUia 33425-0310 City 11aIi: (407) 375-6()()() ~JU: (407) 375-6090 April 15, 1996 Trammell Crow Residential (TCR) 6400 Congress Avenue, Suite 2000 Boca Raton, Florida 33487 Attn: Bettina Scherer RE: Initial Review Comments - Vinings at Boynton Beach - Phase II File No. MSPM 96-003 Dear Bettina Scherer: The City of Boynton Beach has completed its first review of the documents submitted for the above-referenced project. Attached are comments made by the reviewing departments during their initial review of your project. In order to complete the review process, the site plan and documents must be amended to comply with these comments within 90 days of the date of this letter. (If amended plans are not submitted in 90 days, a new application fee will be required.) When there are comments made by the reviewers that you feel are not applicable to the approval of the project or will be addressed separately and you have not amended the plans to comply with the comment(s), you must prepare written explanation for each comment stating why the comment is not applicable and return the explanation with the amended plans and documents. After amending the plans and documents, please submit twelve (12) complete sets (including surveys) of the plans to the Planning and Zoning Department. When the amended plans and documents have been submi t ted to the Planning and Zoning Department, they will be distributed to the reviewing departments for second review and recommendation to the appropriate boards for approval or denial (see attached meeting schedule). A recommendation for denial will be made if there are major comments that have not been addressed on the resubmitted plans. 51merka's (jateway to tfie (julfstream TCR TRA~t~IELL CR()\\,_~ESIDE':-;TI",L ('-l-()l) ( ~)l1srl'.,)" .\VenUL ,LI ltc' ":1)1 JI) l'Ul,lltltllI1. FL ,>341';- :-iil;-: 'il);-_'i;-IJ() F. \\ ,-iO;- i ,)C);- -K64LJ April 22, 1996 VIA COURIER DELIVERY Mr. Michael Haag Planning and Zoning City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Re: Vinings at Boynton Beach - Phase II Dear Mike: Enclosed are the documents, as outlined below, pursuant to Tambri Heyden's letter of April 15, 1996. We received the last of staff's comments on April 17th and have incorporated as many of the changes as possible, and still maintaining your resubmittal deadline of April 22nd. Thank you for your continued assistance in getting us on the May 21st BBCC agenda. The majority of the comments have been incorporated on the revised plans; some items will be provided in working drawings; some comments require further study, as outlined specifically below. Enclosed please find the following: Twelve (12) Sets of Revised Plans 1 of 23 Site Plan 2 of 23 Utilities Plan 3 of 23 Landscape Plan 4 of 23 Phase II Survey 5 of 23 Phase I Plat 6 of 23 Phase I Plat continued 7 of 23 Architectural Cover Sheet 8 of 23 A2 Floor Plan 9 of 23 AZG, B2G and C2N Floor Plan 10 of 23 A3 Floor Plan 11 of 23 A3G, B3G and C3 Floor Plan 12 of 23 Building Type II First and Second Floor 13 of 23 Building Type II Third Floor and Roof Plan 14 of 23 Building Type II Elevations 15 of 23 Building Type IV First Floor 16 of 23 Building Type IV Second and Third Floor 17 of 23 Building Type IV Elevations 18 of 23 Building Type IV Roof Floor Plan 19 of 23 Building Type VI First, Second, Third and Roof Plan 20 of 23 Building Type VI Elevations Plan 21 of 23 Leasing Office Floor Plan 22 of 23 Leasing Office Elevations 23 of 23 Dumpster Plan Revised Site Plan Application (wlhighIighted notations) Colored elevations (previously submitted with color samples) Transparency of landscape dntwing will be provided. Photographs of surrounding property will be provided. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: 1. Sheet 1 of 2 now indicates that Phase I as "existing" and a darker boundary line between the two phases has been provided. 2. a. Perimeter control dimensions are shown. b. Drive isles with back-up spaces are shown to be 27 feet. c. The sidewalk in front of the leasing office is 5' to accommodate any overhang of parked cars. 3. a. We have repositioned building #10 to provide for the 20' setback requested. b . We have repositioned building #5 to provide for the 40' setback along S. W. 8th Street. 4. The established perimeter building setbacks are shown. 5. Access Isle has been dimensioned at 27 feet. 6. A current survey of Phase II and copy of the Plat for Phase I is attached, as requested. 7. Note as to "first 10 d.u.'s per bldg. " has been deleted. 8. Parking for Tennis, Pool and Leasing Office have been increased as requested. Calculations have been modified accordingly. 9. Floor plan drawings indicate the 9'xI8' parking stall in the garage as well as in the tandem space in front of each garage. 10. An Easement, Maintenance and Cost Sharing Agreement, which grants Phase II access through the shared entry road, is attached. This document was recorded back in July of 1995. It was prepared by Amy Schlosser, Esquire and Broad & Cassel. If Jim Cherofhas any questions or concerns, she can be reached at 407-483-7000. 11. You have asked us to dimension on the site plan the building overhang so that it doesn't encroach into an easement or setback. Patios on the second floor on the non-parking side have been shown. On the front of the buildings where a patio is above a tandem parking space we are unable to show the patio because we needed to show the full parking space. The only area that a patio may be in close proximity to an easement is at Building #6. A detailed plan can be drawn to accommodate this request separately. 12. FAR information has been included on the site plan. 13. With respect to the landscaping around the lift station, we have modified the plan to provide for palm trees to be on the south side of the station to provide for a continues screen. 14. Our planting plan on the north boundary of the PUD is similar to that as forwarded. Does it need to be exactly as shown, including slash pines? We prefer the live oak and laurel oak plantings as it will provide a better screening. Please advise. We can work this out in the working drawing stage of our submittal. 15. We have shown the existing easements on the landscape plan. The native canopy trees shown near the easement which borders the single family development can be planted on the north side of the easement so that we can accommodate the utility department and your pre-approved landscape requirements for that area. 16. Tree Management Plan for Phase I and Phase II was submitted with the original application A copy is attached and the plan is still effective. 17 . We ask you to consider that the north property line buffer be installed in conjunction with the schedule of construction. Our sequence of construction, much like Phase I would begin at the entry and work it's way back to the eastern part of the project. 18. Height of Section "A" and "C" berms have been called out on the landscape plans at cross sections. With respect to Section "B", the railroad bufferlberm exceeds a height of 12' in Phase I and we expect a similar situation to present itself during the grading of Phase I. This will be more clearly defined in the working drawings and will be shown on the drainage plans. 19. Height of fence and native trees have been called out at buffer Section "C". 20. Cocoplum notation has been made on the plan with respect to Section "C" buffer, as well as a comment for same to be 24" oc. 21. Hedge heights have been called out on the landscape plan. 22. Contour lines have been sbown on the landscape as best as possible considering this is a SO scale drawing. Please note that funclional grnding will be developed in the working drawings and full in place with the working drawings for grndiug and drainage plans. 23. Fire HYdrants are shown on the site plan and master utililiesplan. Resolulions of conflicts, if any, will be dealt with in the landscape working drawings. 24. With various symbols and DOtes, we believe we have indicated more clearly your requests. *PJease note that while Phase r and Phase II "'" both owned by TCR, they will not share a unity of lille. With this in mind, we as the owner, feel that the City needs to work with us on allowing us 10 determine the buffering between these two sites, especially in light of the setbacks and lake feature, shared entry, etc., that provides for a very pleasing transition between the two phases. 25. Building colors will match Phase 1. Please note that a site plan amendment was processed amending the colors during the Phase I construction. Your building </epartmeut has the revised site plan color selections on file. P&Z was copied and approved the revisions. 26. Elevations drawings show colors as requested. 27. Dumpster enclosures have been depicted with colors. RECOMMENDA TIONS: 28. We have moved the volleyball court as shown on the landscape drawing. (still need to add it to the site plan) 29. We prefer DOt 10 use maleleuca mulch. Cypress was approved and used for Phase 1. ENGINEERING COMMENTS~ 1. All plans will meet code requirements and we understand the pennjlling process. 2. Bill Asbury with the Buynton Beach Post Office designated that road for Phase II will be Darned · Asbury Way.. Upon finalizalion of the addresses for the buildings, we will forward to you this information. 3. Chapter 2, Sec. 9C page 2-80 deals primarily with rezoning. Is there something in that section pertaining to this site plan modification? 4. Master Landscape plan was provided. 5. Structures have been shown. No temporary structures above ground are existent with the exception of the lift station. Abandonment of the old can lift station will be provided on working drawings for this portion of the development 6. Master drainage plan was provided. 7. Plat is forthcoming. 8. Sidewalks are shown. 9. Bikepath is existing. 10. Drainage certification will be provided. 11. Minimum pavement widths are called out or shown to meed code. 12. Parking lot dimensions are detailed and garage and tandem spaces are shown on the architectural drawings. 13. Drainage permits will be forwarded to you. 14. Remove median in entryway? These have already been built. 15. Photometries as well as a lighting plan was prepared, however, a few spots showed deficiencies with respect to .5 lumens. A revised photometric plan has been ordered. 16. Lighting plan will be provided. 17. Stop signs and bars are shown. 18. We were unable to show all the wheel stops at this time. We will provide it on a secondary site plan. 20. Curbing will be same as Phase I as approved and to Code. 21. Handicapped provision have been made. 22. Handicapped space at Leasing Area has been shown. 23. Handicapped space will be painted in accordance to Code and City's requirements. RECOMMENDATIONS: A. Prefer not to include a one-way out at Building 3 & 4 as the entry flows beautifully as designed. It is an elegant entry for both communities. A one-way would require excessive signage and policing. B. Speed limit has been reduced to 25 mph. C. Wheel stops were approved for Phase I. Both communities should have the same parking. POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: 1. Speed limit reduced to 25mph and posted. 2. Stop signs and bars have been shown. 3. No Parking signs will be posted at Building's 9 & 4. See R8-3 detail. 4. We will install a guard rail at the "Tn intersection as recommended. UTILITIES 1. HRS permits will be provided. 2. Palms will be provided in utility easements. Please review the landscape area between the single family an the western portion of Phase II where the water main easement falls. P&Z has instituted that native canopy trees must be planted in those locations. Please advise. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Dumpsters have been properly shown with 10' inside dimensions on all plans. FORESTER 1. The tree management plans had been previously submitted. The slash pines can not be relocated and provisions to provide replacement trees will be made as indicated. ttina A. Scherer Development Associate cc: Site Plan File TCR TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL 6400 Congress Avenue Suite 2000 Boca Raton, FL 3.>487 (407) 997-9700 FAX (407) 997-8649 m~-'~ o ~ @ ~ ,1 "\W.it, "..'.".i..;..,. i; ~ Ji. APR - 4 /996 19: PLANNING AND ZON!NG OEPt April 3, 1996 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Mr. Michael Haag Planning and Zoning City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd, Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Re: Vinings at Boynton Beach - Phase /I Dear Mike: Enclosed are three of the colored renderings for this project. One is a mountable version which you can use for your meetings and two are 8 1/2 & 11 for your file. Please call me to confirm the schedule. Development Associate cc: Site Plan File r- -c . I'\) tJ:! r~' ~,......- _. ._..LlL...l..L... ~~ :2 ~~ I ~'" I '~~....' IIrii... THE VIHINGS AT BOYNTON BEACH II TRi\MMEU C'lOW Rf'SIDE:N 11M. I':LOI~ID,l\ ~.'.r...'....... 'i:- ":-" -, I 'I r- -c . I\J IIIII _____---L.....______ ~, I,' ~ . I -~~.) iiIIa.. THE VININGS AT BOYNTON BEACH II THtd\'~MELL CROW HfSIOENTIAl 1.;::\':J1-I. 'L',)::!IC,-~ --'~-....'" SENT BY: 8-26-94 ;1':53Af.l Boynton Bch fax~ 407+997+8649;# 1 " fi:ru City of !Boynton tBuuli - ~.v<?}~~q-z;,,,,, , :.; ." \ I ., ' 4/ ~' \ ~/'~~:/~~ ',.) "_ _"" ~lt.. , ~,....~ . _0 y~ l00$.~~~ !I.O. -.JI0 ~ ~ 1fari/a J.3425-DJ10 City 1Itd1: (.ff1l) 375-6f)1X) 'FJtX: (.f()1) 37S4J90 August 2S. 1994 Bettina Scherer TrammeU Crow Residential 6400 Cpngress Avenue, Suite 2000 Boca Raton. FL 33487 Dear Ms. Scherer. Re: Tree Management Plan, The vinings at Boynton Beach 1 have reviewed the documeI1t and have the following comments: Ee~ocation of PAl mil: / Please iudicate on the laIuIscape plan where these two Pa\mS well be plontcd- Tbosc- should be in Bdmtinn to those trees already indicated on the landscape plan. Renl~c~cnt ofSluh Pines: v . The 122 cxisliDg SIaah PiIIc treCS should be rep1a<cd with a IllIIive large shade lIt:e fum . opcck:s on the landscoPe plan. PI..... indicale. On the loudsoape plan ~ these 122 rep\al:cDlelll trees will be planted. These trees should be in adPi~rm to 'those trees already indicated on the laIldacapc plan: The tahulationshect of)'OlD: document indic:atCs . total of 110 I - placed OIl the site. / B-ernmmP.ndation For ~hu~h Pine 'Ren]ac~Pnt: The 122 Slash Pine treeS rtlD)ved should be replaced with quantities of the following species placed in the 25' landscaPe buffi:r adjacent to.the wm line of the Scaboanl Coast Line Rai1mad 1. SCl'Ub Oak (Quercuslnopma) , 2. Sand Live Oak (Quercus Geminata) 3. Chapman's Oak (Quercus Chapmanii) 4. Myrtle Oak (Quercus Myrtlfolia) 'These trees 8' " 10' ht II'lnimmD could be p1antcd in c.oqj1lD<li0ll with the Saba! Palms and Wf/iX j(merU:as {jatefV4Y to tIit tjulfstTUl14 SENT BY: ; 8-26-94 ;11:S3AM Boynton Bch fax~ 401+991+8649;# ~ ., -.. Myrtle slmIbs. The Queen PllIIiruee 9houId not be p\anled in this buffer with the above native species listing. The clearing of eXisting' trees! vegetation can occur only on the portion of the property that will have improVements tartcd withiil30 days. -) ~ should be completed prior to the issuance ofthc Sincerely, /{~ }- )fJJ-- Kevin Ha11Slhan HorticulturistlEnviromnenta1ist City of Boynton Beach; park Department' . , jg:K.H ., ..11~XX\" l)()'Y'I~I~r.. r.. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE. LTD August 22, 1994 Mr. Kevin John Hallahan Forester/Environmentalist City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Re: The Vinings at Boynton Beach - Phase I and Phase II Dear Mr. Hallahan: This letter serves as our Tree Management Plan for the above referenced site as you requested. INTRODUCTION: The proposed Vinings at Boynton Beach Phase I and Phase II is located within the Woolbright Place PUD. The Phase I site consists of 15.37 acres. The Phase II site contains 18.50 acres. The majority of the sites have been previously cleared. The remaining vegetation, due to the condition of the deep sandy soils, consists dominantly of scrub plant species with minor invasions by the undesirable exotics. EXISTING TREES ON SITE: On August 18, 1994, Gregory S. Mire, P.L.S., made an inspection of the site and found no hardwoods, 122 Slash Pine (Pinus elliottii) and 2 Sabal Palms on the sites. PRESERVATION PLAN: We will attempt to move and preserve the Sabal Palms to the areas shown on the Landscape Plan at the perimeter buffer area. Removal of the Slash Pines is contemplated for two reasons (a) interference with proposed improvements and (b) due to finish grade changes contemplated to the site. RELOCATION OF PALMS: The two Sabal Palms selected for relocation will be tagged with colored surveyor's tape and markedo The best method of relocation is believed to by tree spade or equivalent. Fronds shall be carefully removed except for the young protective growth surrounding the heart or bud at time of transplanting. REPLACEMENT OF SLASH PINES: The Slash Pines will be removed and replaced in equal quantity with differing species as shown on the landscape plan. Please note the following tabulation: 644 ANTONE ST . SUITE 1 . ATLANTA, GA 30318 PH (404) 352-2240 FAX (404) 352.2492 Mr. Kevin John Hallahan August 22, 1994 Page 2 TREE LOCATION CODE REQUIREMENT TOTAL TREES REQUIRED 95 TOTAL TREES PROVIDED Along Public Rights-of-Way 1 for every 40' If 176 General land- scape/multi- family 1 for every 1500 sf 406 696 Parking islands 1 for every SOO'sf 46 86 Removal of 122 Slash Pines 1 for every removed 122 122 TOTAL TREES: 669 1101 MAINTENANCE PROGRAM: At the time of planting relocated material, an earth berm shall be formed along the outside edge of the root ball to create a basin for retaining water within the root ball area. Irrigation of relocated plant material shall be administered in adequate amount by means of an automatic or manual system in conjunction with rain fall. The duration for the watering program is intended to continue until the root system is established and the tree can maintain itself on natural rain fall. Bracing of relocated trees will be determined in the field as to size of the tree and site conditions such as on a slope. Fertilization of relocated plant material shall occur once at the time of transplanting. If you have any questions or need any further information, please contact me. Landscape Architect No. 661 cc: a Scherer, Trammell Crow Residential CCl CONSULTANTS, INC. Consulting Engineers ~tJ'~' '-?\'.~.~".'~.il";" " ~~ ',' Surveyors .' . z~ : ,:.:. Planners '" ..,) ~:~~;;;:.;~~~:>. __ J 2200 PARK CENTRAL BLVD., N, SUITE 100, POMPANO BEACH, FL 33064, (305) 974-2200. FAX (305) 973-2686 August 18, 1994 Mr. Kevin Halahan CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 RE: The Vinings at Boynton Beach eCl Project No. 3420 Dear Kevin: As discussed with Richard C. Wohlfarth of our office, we are providing the following list of trees present on the above referenced site: Hardwoods 0 Pines 122 Palms 2 We will be incorporating these quantities in our landscape plan. Very truly..y..ours, onsultants, Inc. GSM:tmc cc: Gary S. Colecchio, CCl Consultants, Inc. Page 2 of 2 Initial Review Comments Vinings at Boynton Beach - Phase II File No. MSPM 96-003 Dates pertaining to the remainder of the review process including the Planning and Development Board and City Commission meetings, are identified on the attached Review Schedule. The amended plans will be due by 5:00 P.M. on April 22, 1996. A checklist that contains information regarding the second submission of the plans and documents for review is attached. If you should have any questions regarding the comments or the approval schedule, please feel free to call Mike Haag, who is coordinating the review of your site plan for the Planning and Zoning Department, Very truly yours, ~f~ i J, Heyden ning and Zoning Director TJH:bme Atts. A:lstComLtr.VII - ~ CHECKLIST The following list and information is provided as a checklist to ensure that the submittal of amended plans and documents is substantially complete for review. Turning in this list and the appropriate plans and documents will enable the submittal to be efficiently checked prior to being accepted by the Planning and Zoning Department. Project Name: Vinings at Boynton Beach - Phase II (File No. MSPM 96-003) 1. Submit an amended Site Plan Review/Conditional Use application form that reflects the changes that were made as a result of amending the plans and documents to comply with the Code of Ordinances and the Technical Review Committee comments. A copy of the original form with a distinguishable symbol identifying the change(s) may be submitted or a completed new form with the changes identified. If there are no changes required to be documented on the application form, a letter from the applicant stating same must be turned in with the amended submittal. 2. Submit twelve (12) assembled and complete sets of plans and documents, including surveys that show compliance with the Code of Ordinances and comments made by the Technical Review Committee. Two (2) of the sets shall have the appropriate legible raised seal and signature of the designer responsible for the drawing(s). Plans and documents shall be assembled in twelve (12) individual complete packages with the title of the project on all pages and/or sheets and each page or sheet numerically numbered such as the following example: 1 of 3, 2 of 3, 3 of 3. 3. Submit color photographs of the buildings on the site that are to remain in their existing condition and photos of existing buildings that are located on the sites that abut the perimeter of the subject property. The minimum size is 5" by 7". Each photograph shall be labeled to identify the location of the existing structures with respect to the location of the proposed project. If the abutting property is vacant photographs are not required. 4. Submit colored elevation view drawings - a colored duplicate copy of all drawings of the elevation views of each side of all buildings and signage associated with the project. The oolors shown and described on the colored elevation views shall match the colors identified on the elevation drawings submitted for site plan review. All exterior surfaces of the structure (s) shall be colored and the color name, associated color code and manufacturer identified. The type of exterior surface material shall also be identified on the drawing. The colored elevation drawings shall have compass direction or title of the side of the building identified. The title block of the original drawing shall be shown. The maximum size is 24" by 36". Do not submit on board of any kind. 5, Submit color samples as an example of the proposed colors. Each sample shall have attached a label that identifies the color by name, color code and manufacturer. The colors should be referenced from an established color chart. 6. Submit a 8 1/2" x II" transparency of the landscape site plan drawing to be used on an overhead projector at board meetings. -_______u__..~ ..u...~u ~'-""'>lu.J..n.L:l O:>U01YLl.l.T.A.1.J Ul" A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS, PURSUANT TO THE MUNICIPAL IMPLEMENTATION ORDINANCE OF PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ORDINANCE REQUIRE ADDITIONAL REVIEW TIME. NOTE: REFER QUESTIONS REGARDING TRAFFIC TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. (4) THE ABOVE DATES MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. CONTACT THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY DATES. a:96RevlHf.arw REAL EStATE Q~~~\a \;:&- Worth Ave. landlord sued by Dutch Antilles creditor Just months after Worth Ave- nue landlord Burton Han- delsman faced a lawsuit from IS partner on the Gucci building, he's being sued by a creditor on a neighboring structure he owns on Palm Beach's famous retail strip. The latest suit comes from Alwaha N.V., a Dutch Antilles corporation. Alwaha named Han- delsman's Palm V Associations LP as the sole defen- dant in the Nov. 20 suit filed at the Court of Chancery in Delaware's New Castle County, Like the first suit, where part- ner Power Corp. of Ire- land said Handelsman refused to open the partnership's books, Al- waha made a similar claim as a creditor on a $4.8 million loan, "As a creditor, we have the right to see the records of the company," said Alwaha's Wil- mington, Del. attorney, Martin S. Lessner. "We're entitled to see what's going on with Palm V, and they've been stalling as far as in showing us." According to the complaint, Handelsman's company stopped paying on the loan in September 1995. Because Handelsman oper- ates the property, which stretches from 224 to 246 Worth Ave., through his Love Realty, Lessner says those books should be opened, too. Handelsman could not be reached for comment. Tenants at the Worth Avenue property include Gallery Ver- sailles, Revillon and Marisa, LINUS CHUA . NEW YORK TAKES NOTE OF HOT INDUSTRIAL MARKET: Last week, Commercial Florida Realty Partners, a Boca Raton real estate research and broker- age firm, reported industrial space occupancy rates in Palm Beach County had taken a slight dip. Not s<:>Il1~~~~~,to ":.f?I'!Y ~bout, the market. Austin, Texas, where IBM Corp. moved about 1,000 workers last year from Boca Raton, ranked second in the category. Broward County ranked No.6. For warehouse and distribu- tion space, Palm Beach County ranked eighth while Broward was rated the No.5 market for growth potential in this class of industrial space, . UPSCALE TOWNHOMES FOR BOYNTON: Trammell Crow, one of the country's biggest apart- ment builders, is counting on growth in Boynton Beach. Earlier this month, the compa- ny, which has Boca Raton regional headquarters, took out a $14,6 million loan from Fleet Na- tional Bank for phase two of an ~partment community it's build- mg. Called the Vinings at Boynton Beach, the 252 units in the first phase already are leased, said Greg Iglehart, a development partner at Trammell Crow's Boca Raton office. Construction on the second phase, which will have 296 units, began earlier this month, he said. It's expected to be finished at the end of next year. For this phase, TrammeR Crow decided to go more upscale. About 30 percent of the new units will be townhomes with attached garages, Iglehart said, The exist- ing development has no town- homes. "It's a good infilllocation," he said of the site, which already has the roads and utilities and a strong retail base around it, in- cluding a Home Depot next door, "It's close to entertainment and the beach." The property is at the north- west comer of Interstate 95 and Woolbright Road, The new units, however, won't share amenities such as a pool, jacuzzi, tennis courts, chil- dren's playroom and fitness cen- ter with the existing apartments, Iglehart said. The new develop- ment will have its own offerings, But both will share a common entrance. . _L.:____~_ N U In member I, CalltO' & 1-800 Offias in Nnv ~ TOSU TOT~ Call 820-46 IS Our tJ:he City of 'Boynton 'Beacli 100 'E. 'Boynton 'B~1i 'Boukvard P.O, 'Bo:t310 'Boynton 'Beadi., ~foritfa 33425-0310 City 9fafl: (407) 375..(j()()() ~JU: (407) 375-6090 May 13, 1996 CCL Consultants, Inc. 2200 Park Central Boulevard, North, Suite 100 Pompano Beach, Florida 33064 Re: The Vinings at Boynton Beach - Phase II Property Location: East side of S.W. 8th Street, approximately 1900 feet north of Woolbright File No. MSPM 96-003 Atn: Bettina Scherer Trammell Crow Residential (TCR) Dear Ms. Scherer: The attached package will be presented to the Planning and Development Board on May 14, 1996 (see attached agenda) and then to the City Commission May 21, 1996. Permit plans shall be amended determination of your request and generated by staff following review permit documents that are required to of the project. to comply with the final additional comments may be for technical compliance of be submitted for development For your convenience, attached is a list of documents required for permit submittal. An approval of the site plan by the City Commission shall be valid for one (1) year, unless a building permit from the Building Department is secured. If the applicant fails to secure a building permit in that time, all previous approvals shall become null and void. ~:;:;E7Z7 (~~hael E. Haag Q ~nning and Zoning Administrator MEH:bme attachments xc: Central File a:P&Dpkgltr,VIN j{merkas (jattway to tfie (jufJstream ~.'iN/~1, v c . , . ....,~ OJ ~./'.; '~,;J' - .- V.'-'- ~/.., /~. . . yo. DBl?AR. 1BNT OP DBVB~ PMBNT Bu~I...D:X:N'G DIVIS:""'vN SUBMITIAL DOCUMENTS NOVEMBERl99S rn NOV 2 J 1995 m m@~owm Congratulations on receiving Site Approval for your proposed construction within We appreciate your choosing to build within our City. In order to ensure timely permitting, submit 2 sets of the following documents: I. A signed and sealed survey (not over six months old) by a Florida registered surveyor indicating: A. All property lines B. North arrow C. Existing structures and paving D. Reference elevations E. Rights-of-way F. Easement and/or utilities, including fire hydrants on or adjacent to the site G. Legal description H. Area to the nearest one-hundredth of an acre I. Location sketch of property II. A site plan in conformance with LDR Chapter 4, properly dimensioned and to scale showing: A. All proposed structures _ B. All existing structures that are to remain on site C. Setback lines from the property lines to closest vertical wall of all structures D, Use of each structure (or uses within multiple occupancies) E. Use of adjacent properties, including streets, alleys, sidewalks, turn lanes and driveways F. Elevations of the lowest finished floor of each structure on site G. Location of existing utility lines on or adjacent to the site H. Location of dumpster enclosure and details of construction III. A paving plan in conformance with LDR Chapter 23, indicating: A. The number of required,parking stalls (See LDR Chapter 2, 'Sectiori 11 H) B. Cross sections of proposed construction C. Curbing and striping meeting City Standards G. D. Conformance with LDR Chapter 22, Streets and Sidewalks E. Handicapped parking stalls F. Dimensions of stalls, back-up areas, driveways and traffic lanes Traffic control devices and signs IV. A drainage plan for the site, including: A. Finish grade and pavement elevations B. Drainage calculations C. Details of drainage system. If site area exceeds 1/2 acre, plans must be certified by a Florida engineer (Continued) -- TCR TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAl 6400 Congress Avenue Suite 2000 Boca Raton, FL 33487 (407) 997-9700 FAX (407) 997-8649 April 25, 1996 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS - TUBE Mr, Michael Haag Planning and Zoning City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd, Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Re: Vinings at Boynton Beach - Phase II Dear Mike: As promised, enclosed are the following items: 1. Colored Elevation with color codes marked. 2. Photographs of the site and surrounding views, 3. Transparency of the landscape plan Thank you for your continued assistance on this project. Sin II ~' I ettina A. Scherer Development Associate cc: Site Plan File c_~. ._ TCR TRAM~IELL CROW RESIDENTIAL 6400 Congress Avenue Suite 2000 Boca Raton, FL 33487 (407) 997-9700 FAX (407) 997-8649 April 22, 1996 VIA COURIER DELIVERY Mr. Michael Haag Planning and Zoning City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Re: Vinings at Boynton Beach - Phase II Dear Mike: Enclosed are the documents, as outlined below, pursuant to Tambri Heyden's letter of April 15, 1996. We received the last of staff's comments on April 17th and have incorporated as many of the changes as possible, and still maintaining your resubmittal deadline of April 22nd. Thank you for your continued assistance in getting us on the May 21st BBCC agenda. The majority of the comments have been incorporated on the revised plans; some items will be provided in working drawings; some comments require further study, as outlined specifically below. Enclosed please f'md the following: Twelve (12) Sets of Revised Plans 1 of 23 Site Plan 2 of 23 Utilities Plan 3 of 23 Landscape Plan 4 of 23 Phase II Survey 5 of 23 Phase I Plat 6 of 23 Phase I Plat continued 7 of 23 Architectural Cover Sheet 8 of 23 A2 Floor Plan 9 of 23 A2G, B2G and C2N Floor Plan 10 of 23 A3 Floor Plan 11 of 23 A3G, B3G and C3 Floor Plan 12 of 23 Building Type II First and Second Floor 13 of 23 Building Type II Third Floor and Roof Plan 14 of 23 Building Type II Elevations 15 of 23 Building Type IV First Floor 16 of 23 Building Type IV Second and Third Floor 17 of 23 Building Type IV Elevations IS of 23 Building Type IV Roof Floor Plan 19 of 23 Building Type VI First, Second, Third and Roof Plan 20 of 23 Building Type VI Elevations Plan 21 of 23 Leasing Office Floor Plan 22 of 23 Leasing Office Elevations 23 of 23 Dumpster Plan Revised Site Plan Application (w/highlighted notations) Colored elevations (previously submitted with color samples) Transparency of landscape drawing will be provided. Photographs of surrounding property will be provided. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: 1. Sheet 1 of 2 now indicates that Phase I as "existing" and a darker boundary line between the two phases has been provided. 2. a. Perimeter control dimensions are shown. b. Drive isles with back-up spaces are shown to be 27 feet. c. The sidewalk in front of the leasing office is 5' to accommodate any overhang of parked cars. 3. a. We have repositioned building #10 to provide for the 20' setback requested. b. We have repositioned building #5 to provide for the 40' setback along S. W. Sth Street. 4. The established perimeter building setbacks are shown. 5. Access Isle has been dimensioned at 27 feet. 6. A current survey of Phase II and copy of the Plat for Phase I is attached, as requested. 7. Note as to "first 10 d.u. 's per bldg." has been deleted. S. Parking for Tennis, Pool and Leasing Office have been increased as requested. Calculations have been modified accordingly. 9. Floor plan drawings indicate the 9'xlS' parking stall in the garage as well as in the tandem space in front of each garage. 10. An Easement, Maintenance and Cost Sharing Agreement, which grants Phase II access through the shared entry road, is attached. This document was recorded back in July of 1995. It was prepared by Amy Schlosser, Esquire and Broad & Cassel. If Jim Cherof has any questions or concerns, she can be reached at 407-483-7000. 11. You have asked us to dimension on the site plan the building overhang so that it doesn't encroach into an easement or setback, Patios on the second floor on the non-parking side have been shown. On the front of the buildings where a patio is above a tandem parking space we are unable to show the patio because we needed to show the full parking space. The only area that a patio may be in close proximity to an easement is at Building #6. A detailed plan can be drawn to accommodate this request separately. 12. FAR information has been included on the site plan. 13. With respect to the landscaping around the lift station, we have modified the plan to provide for palm trees to be on the south side of the station to provide for a continues screen. 14. Our planting plan on the north boundary of the PUD is similar to that as forwarded. Does it need to be exactly as shown, including slash pines? We prefer the live oak and laurel oak plantings as it will provide a better screening. Please advise. We can work this out in the working drawing stage of our submittal. 15. We have shown the existing easements on the landscape plan. The native canopy trees shown near the easement which borders the single family development can be planted on the north side of the easement so that we can accommodate the utility department and your pre-approved landscape requirements for that area. 16. Tree Management Plan for Phase I and Phase II was submitted with the original application A copy is attached and the plan is still effective. 17. We ask you to consider that the north property line buffer be installed in conjunction with the schedule of construction. Our sequence of construction, much like Phase I would begin at the entry and work it's way back to the eastern part of the project. 18. Height of Section" A" and "C" berms have been called out on the landscape plans at cross sections. With respect to Section "B", the railroad buffer/berm exceeds a height of 12' in Phase I and we expect a similar situation to present itself during the grading of Phase I. This will be more clearly defined in the working drawings and will be shown on the drainage plans. 19. Height of fence and native trees have been called out at buffer Section "C". 20. Cocoplum notation has been made on the plan with respect to Section "C" buffer, as well as a comment for same to be 24" oc. 21. Hedge heights have been called out on the landscape plan, 22. Contour lines have been shown on the landscape as best as possible considering this is a 50 scale drawing, Please note that functional grading will be developed in the working drawings and fall in place with the working drawings for grading and drainage plans. 23. Fire Hydrants are shown on the site plan and master utilities plan, Resolutions of conflicts, if any, will be dealt with in the landscape working drawings. 24. With various symbols and notes, we believe we have indicated more clearly your requests, *Please note that while Phase I and Phase II are both owned by TCR, they will not share a unity of title. With this in mind, we as the owner, feel that the City needs to work with us on allowing us to determine the buffering between these two sites, especially in light of the setbacks and lake feature, shared entry, etc., that provides for a very pleasing transition between the two phases. 25. Building colors will match Phase I. Please note that a site plan amendment was processed amending the colors during the Phase I construction. Your building department has the revised site plan color selections on file. P&Z was copied and approved the revisions. 26. Elevations drawings show colors as requested. 27. Dumpster enclosures have been depicted with colors. RECOMMENDATIONS: 28. We have moved the volleyball court as shown on the landscape drawing. (still need to add it to the site plan) 29. We prefer not to use maleleuca mulch. Cypress was approved and used for Phase I. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: 1. All plans will meet code requirements and we understand the permitting process. 2. Bill Asbury with the Boynton Beach Post Office designated that road for Phase II will be named "Asbury Way". Upon finalization of the addresses for the buildings, we will forward to you this information. 3. Chapter 2, Sec. 9C page 2-80 deals primarily with rezoning. Is there something in that section pertaining to this site plan modification? 4. Master Landscape plan was provided. 5. Structures have been shown. No temporary structures above ground are existent with the exception of the lift station. Abandonment of the old can lift station will be provided on working drawings for this portion of the development 6. Master drainage plan was provided. 7. Plat is forthcoming. 8, Sidewalks are shown. 9. Bikepath is existing. 10. Drainage certification will be provided. 11. Minimum pavement widths are called out or shown to meed code. 12. ParkiDg lot dimensions are detailed and garage and tandem spaces are shown on the architectural drawings. 13. Drainage permits will be forwarded to you. 14. Remove median in entryway? These have already been built. 15. Photometries as well as a lighting plan was prepared, however, a few spots showed deficiencies with respect to .5 lumens. A revised photometric plan has been ordered. 16. Lighting plan will be provided. 17. Stop signs and bars are shown. 18. We were unable to show all the wheel stops at this time. We will provide it on a secondary site plan. 20. Curbing will be same as Phase I as approved and to Code. 21. Handicapped provision have been made. 22. Handicapped space at Leasing Area has been shown. 23. Handicapped space will be painted in accordance to Code and City's requirements. RECOMMENDATIONS: A. Prefer not to include a one-way out at Building 3 & 4 as the entry flows beautifully as designed. It is an elegant entry for both communities. A one-way would require excessive signage and policing. fJ1ie City of 'Boynton 'Beacli 100 'E. 'Boynton tJJUI&6. tJJoukvartf P.O. tJJo~310 tJJoynton tJJUI&~ 1"fori.tfa 33425.0310 City!Jfa{[: (407) 375..(i()()() 1"JtX: (407) 375-6090 -~_:--~ April 15, 1996 Trammell Crow Residential (TCR) 6400 Congress Avenue, Suite 2000 Boca Raton, Florida 33487 Attn: Bettina Scherer RE: Initial Review Comments - Vinings at Boynton Beach - Phase II File No. MSPM 96-003 Dear Bettina Scherer: The City of Boynton Beach has completed its first review of the documents submitted for the above-referenced project. Attached are comments made by the reviewing departments during their initial review of your project. In order to complete the review process, the site plan and documents must be amended to comply with these comments within 90 days of the date of this letter. (If amended plans are not submi t ted in 90 days, a new application fee will be required.) When there are comments made by the reviewers that you feel are not applicable to the approval of the proj ect or will be addressed separately and you have not amended the plans to comply with the comment(s), you must prepare written explanation for each comment stating why the comment is not applicable and return the explanation with the amended plans and documents. After amending the plans and documents, please submit twelve (12) complete sets (including surveys) of the plans to the Planning and Zoning Department. When the amended plans and documents have been submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department, they will be distributed to the reviewing departments for second review and recommendation to the appropriate boards for approval or denial (see attached meeting schedule). A recommendation for denial will be made if there are major comments that have not been addressed on the resubmitted plans. Y1muica's (jateway to tlie (julfstream Page 2 of 2 Initial Review Comments Vinings at Boynton Beach - Phase II File No. MSPM 96-003 Dates pertaining to the remainder of the review process including the Planning and Development Board and City Commission meetings, are identified on the attached Review Schedule. The amended plans will be due by 5:00 P.M. on April 22, 1996. A checklist that contains information regarding the second submission of the plans and documents for review is attached. If you should have any questions regarding the comments or the approval schedule, please feel free to call Mike Haag, who is coordinating the review of your site plan for the Planning and Zoning Department. Very truly yours, ~EJ.~ i J. Heyden ning and Zoning Director TJH:bme Atts. A: lstComLtr, VII ~/ 3. ~ ~'f-4. &t\~~ j ~ ~1 6. ~ CHECKLIST The following list and information is provided as a checklist to ensure that the submittal of amended plans and documents is substantially complete for review. Turning in this list and the appropriate plans and documents will enable the submittal to be efficiently checked prior to being accepted by the Planning and Zoning Department. Project Name: Vinings at Boynton Beach - Phase II (File No. MSPM 96-003) 1. Submit an amended Site Plan Review/Conditional Use application form that reflects the changes that were made as a result of amending the plans and documents to comply with the Code of Ordinances and the Technical Review Committee comments. A copy of the original form with a distinguishable symbol identifying the change(s) may be submitted or a completed new form with the changes identified. If there are no changes required to be documented on the application form, a letter from the applicant stating same must be turned in with the amended submittal. 2. Submit twelve (12) assembled and complete sets of plans and documents, including surveys that show compliance with the Code of Ordinances and comments made by the Technical Review Committee. Two (2) of the sets shall have the appropriate legible raised seal and signature of the designer responsible for the drawing(s). Plans and documents shall be assembled in twelve (12) individual complete packages with the title of the project on all pages and/or sheets and each page or sheet numerically numbered such as the following example: 1 of 3, 2 of 3, 3 of 3. Submit color photographs of the buildings on the site that are to remain in their existing condition and photos of existing buildings that are located on the sites that abut the perimeter of the subject property. The minimum size is 5" by 7". Each photograph shall be labeled to identify the location of the existing structures with respect to the location of the proposed project. If the abutting property is vacant photographs are not required. Submit colored elevation view drawings - a colored duplicate copy of all drawings of the elevation views of each side of all buildings and signage associated with the project. The colors shown and described on the colored elevation views shall match the colors identified on the elevation drawings submitted for site plan review. All exterior surfaces of the structure (s) shall be colored and the color name, associated color code and manufacturer identified. The type of exterior surface material shall also be identified on the drawing, The colored elevation drawings shall have compass direction or title of the side of the building identified. The title block of the original drawing shall be shown. The maximum size is 24" by 36". Do not submit on board of any kind. 5 . Submit color samples as an example of the proposed colors. Each sample shall have attached a label that identifies the color by name, color code and manufacturer. The colors should be referenced from an established color chart, Submit a 8 1/2" x 11" transparency of the landscape site plan drawing to be used on an overhead projector at board meetings. . . 1996 REVIEW SCHEDULE FIRST HALF SITE PLAN REVIEW AND CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL *PROJECTS LOCATED WITHIN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ORIGINAL AMENDED CITY *COMM REDEV SUBMITTAL PLANS *C.R.A.B. P&D COMMISSION AGENCY DEADLINE DEADLINE MEETING MEETING MEETING & MEETING Oet 23, '95 Dee 6, '95 Jan 08 Jan 09 Jan 16 Nov 28, '95 Jan 12 Feb 12 Feb 13 Feb 20 Dee 27, '95 Feb 9 Mar 11 Mar. 12 Mar 19 Jan 26 Mar 11 Apr 08 Apr 09 Apr 16 i? 0y0 ( M~y 5 Mar 4 Apr l^. May 13 -----, Mar 29 May 10 Jun 10 Jun 11 Jun 18 Apr 25 Jun 7 Ju1 08 Ju1 09 Jul 16 NOTE: (1) TO FACILITATE THE PROCESSING OF THE REQUEST, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE APPLICANT SET-UP, BY APPOINTMENT, A PRE-APPLICATION MEETING WITH THE DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT (407) 375-6260 PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL DEADLINE DATE. THE MEETING WILL ADDRESS CONCERNS REGARDING THE TYPE OF SUBMITTAL, BOARD REVIEW SCHEDULE, SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES, FEE, APPLICATION FORM, AND TYPE AND NUMBER OF PLANS/DOCUMENTS THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED. (2) IF A SUBMITTAL IS RECEIVED BY THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL DEADLINE DATE AND WITHIN TWO (2) WORKING DAYS FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL DEADLINE, THE SUBMITTAL IS DETERMINED ACCEPTABLE FOR PROCESSING, THE SUBMITTAL WILL FOLLOW THE APPROVAL SCHEDULE IDENTIFIED ABOVE. HOWEVER, IT SHALL BE NOTED THAT THE AMENDED PLANS DEADLINE DATE ALLOCATES ONLY TEN (10) WORKING DAYS FOR THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT A COMPLETE PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE PLANS THAT HAVE BEEN AMENDED TO'COMPLY WITH THE TRC COMMENTS GENERATED FROM THE REVIEW OF THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS. TO KEEP THE REVIEW PROCESS ON SCHEDULE THE AMENDED PLANS DEADLINE DATE IS STRICTLY ENFORCED. IT SHALL ALSO BE NOTED, THAT PRIOR TO A PROJECT BEING RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT, AND BEING PRESENTED TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD OR THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD, THE PROJECT SHALL BE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE. (3) APPLICATIONS WHICH REQUIRE SUBMITTAL OF A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS, PURSUANT TO THE MUNICIPAL IMPLEMENTATION ORDINANCE OF PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ORDINANCE REQUIRE ADDITIONAL REVIEW TIME. NOTE: REFER QUESTIONS REGARDING TRAFFIC TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. (4) THE ABOVE DATES MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. CONTACT THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY DATES. a:96RevlHf,arw rz7ie City of ':Boynton "Beacli ca..,.'..-- ,.. L ":', _...' !Pt4nni.., er ~nt"'rl1-:Dc~. zoo 'E. 'Boy..u... 'B.....Jl ~-ne !P.o. 'Zk>"C.JZO 'Boyneon "B.a.cJi..~.-ida J.!I4~-OJZO (407)375-6260. .AX.(407)375-609D ~~ ~ ~-=:I!.""""-'-~~--- .c=~~- =-=-___;..a..;~~ \ <1 <=t L.-, FAX NUMBER TRANSM%'.1."".E'%NQ '1"0: ~9c-\_ Rb~q ~~ Ap{l ~~ :DATE: z .- PI~f.: q 5"7 - '77CfD Nt.1MBER OF PAGE:S BBZNG '1"RJI~lnDc.J:'r'rB:D a (%ng~ud~ng Co~_r L.tt_r) '1"0 a Y:SE.~,~ \R"""'~L L A.. , ~'..\r-~. C~ ~ ___, ""\7 ~ ~~~,----r-~A..L FROM a - ~,V""c.. ~.- ~ ~",,_~..~-.:::::c__ ~ \-\ ~~ D~C\t( p.). 9~ - d-<;;D fA R. KS C(1o -/89 Pto. 9(;, -() 7 7 ~~Nl-' fol..i<-C. #0;)':/::;&.1)(. 9{,;,-/3/ ~.N()bU., '7(,--i.3)... I ftE: : ~\..\. 0~""",,~~ ~C:::--G-. ~--, ~\'E:.. '-- \" L ~ \~~'E." ~~ ~ --\? .0::.-": c-, -. ~'" ~u,~::~ >~~ ~XV'. - ~"":,. ---C> s.nt Bya ~ O_-~~_ C a"AX. Jl!;J .JZLtnerlca's qatc'a'O.y to tfie qulfstreQ.ff< TRANSMISSION REPORT THIS DOCUMENT (REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE) WAS SENT ** COUNT ** # 12 *** SEND *** NO REMOTE STATION I. D, START TIME DURATION #PAGES COMMENT 1 407+997+8649 4-12-96 3:25PM 6'08" 12 TOTAL 0:06'08" 12 XEROX TELECOPIER 7020 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-200 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director ill ThU~ W ~ FROM: Michael E. Haag Current Planning Coordinator DATE: April 12, 1996 SUBJECT: New Site Plan - 1st Review project: Vinings at Boynton Beach Phase II Location: East side of S. w, 8th street approximately 1,900 feet north of Woolbright Road Agent: Bettina A. Scherer File No.: MSPM 96-003 The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the site plan review of the plans for the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list of comments that identify deficiencies from the City's Land Development Regulations (L.D.R.) that are required to be corrected and shown in compliance on the plans and/or documents submitted for second (2nd) review in order for the project to continue through the site plan review process. The second set of comment(s) lists recommendations that the Planning and Zoning Department staff believe will enhance the proposed development, The applicant shall understand that all documents and plans submitted for site plan review are subject to additional comments. I recommend that the applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the comments, If the applicant is not intending to correct code deficiencies and they request that the project remain on the review schedule identified in the attached letter they should contact me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement, T. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: Show on the site plan (sheet 1 of 2) a symbol that represents the boundary of Phase I and Phase II. Either delineate on the site plall the areas of phase I that are being modified or indicate that phase I is complete and there are no changes are proposed for Phase 1. To properly determine if the parking areas and landscape areas comply with code regulations add to the sheet tilted "Site Plan" (sheet 1 of 2) the appropriate horizontal control dimensions from the property lines to and through the parking areas and landscape areas to the buildings, The dimensions shall include length of parking spaces, width of the access aisle/back-up space and dimension of landscape ares, The control dimensions shall cover all parking spaces and adjacent landscape areas. Relocate building #10 to comply with the 20 foot setback required between Phase I and Phase II, Show, label and dimension on the site plan and landscape plan the established perimeter building setbacks for phase II and Phase I, if there are improvements proposed for that area, Dimension the width of the access aisle leading to Phase II, The survey submitted with the request is not accurate revise the survey and resubmit, Phase I was platted and submitting a copy of the plat will be acceptable for that area of the project, Omit from the Parking Calculations the following text (first 10 d,u, 's per bldg,). ill\M~W~ Page 2 t-Iemor andum 1st Review Vinings at No. 96-200 - Major site Plan Boynton Beach Phase II ~~~~ MOdifi~ion Change the total parking required for the tennis court area from 1 to 2, change the total number of parking spaces required for the pool from 14 to 15 and change the total number of parking spaces required for the leasing office from 6 to 7. Modify the overall calculations accordingly, show and dimension a nine (9) foot wide by eighteen (18) foot long parking space on the floor plan drawings of each different size garage within each different building type that has a garage. Also show on the site plan drawing a nine (9) foot wide by eighteen (18) foot long parking space in the driveway outside of each garage. To ensure that the location of trees and structures do not encroach into an easement add to the site plan and landscape plan notes and symbols that show the location, size and type of proposed and existing easements. Amend the plan accordingly, On the plant list and landscape plan delineate the trees required from the tree preservation ordinance analysis. Place a note on the site plan and landscape plan indicating that the buffer landscaping required for the north property line of the Phase II project shall be completed prior to the first C.o. being issued for a bUilding in Phase II. On the section view drawings of the berms found on the landscape plan indicate the overall height and slope of each berm. Also add the berms to the preliminary drainage plan sheet 2 of 2, Note; the heights of the berms shall not be less than originally approved. Identify the type of fence proposed for the buffer area that lies north of buildings; 1, 2, 5 and 6 and west of buildings 8, 12, 13, and 16, As stipulated by the city Commission approval of the project remove all of the Black Olive trees along this buffer area and replace with a native tree. To ensure that the building overhang does not encroach into an easement or setback show and dimension on the site plan the location and width of the building overhangs. As stipulated by the project approval cocoplum hedges are required along the buffer line identified as section C therefore add a symbol to the landscape plan drawing that represents coco plum hedge material. Also change the spacing of the cocoplum hedge found in the plant list from three (3) feet on center to two (2) feet on center to match the note shown on the plan north of building #5, Add to the plant list for phase II the height of the shrubs (note; minimum height is 18" unless otherwise specified). Add to the landscape plan elevations of the contour lines that form berms depicted on the plan. Also show on the drainage plan the location of the berms. show on the landscape plan calculations to properly identify the total number of trees and/or hedges required to comply with the following code sections for Phase II (note; use a symbol on the landscape plan that indicates the location of the landscape material that is provided to meet the code specifications): * number of trees and/or hedges required and provided to meet the visual barrier specifications to screen the view of the on-site vehicle use area from the abutting property lines to the south (so~ property line of phase ~'&~~ Page 3 Memorandum 1st Review Vinings at * * * * ~~~~~ MOdific~on No. 96-200 - Major Site Plan Boynton Beach Phase II II), north (property line north of buildings 16, 15, 6, 1, 2 and 5 and west of buildings 16, 13, 12 and 8), east (property line east of bUildings 15, 14, 11, 9 and 10) and abutting right-of-way to the west (S.W, 8th Street), Note; unifying title of Phase I with Phase II will eliminate the hedge requirement along the south property line. total landscape area and number of trees required and provided to meet the parking area interior landscaping specifications (note; there are 281 interior parking spaces) . number of trees required to meet the general landscape requirement (note; total area of the entire site divided by 1, 500) , total number of accent plants required and provided for the perimeter of the dumpster enclosures. Provide separate plant list and planting plans to show compliance with the foundation planting requirements for the front and sides of each building. Are the colors of the buildings in Phase II planned to match the color of the buildings in Phase I? The color code for the colors in Phase II do not match the color code approved for Phase I, however the color depicted on the color elevation drawing submitted for Phase II is vary similar to the colors approved for Phase I, Please clarify. Specify on the elevation view drawing found on sheets AM-2, A-T1,3, A-T2.3 and A-T3,2 the location of the colors referenced in the color selection chart. Also incorporate the color chart found on sheet AM-2 onto the plan and omit the stick-on. The elevation view drawings and color chart shall reference the color name, color code and color manufacturer for the following exterior material: i. ii. ii, iv. ,!, vi. vii. viii. ix. x. xi. xii, xiii. roof tile fascia wall stucco window, door and arched raised stucco bands mid wall raised stucco band columns column cap and base window frame door and door frame solid door and door farm glass door and door frame panel overhead railing circular amenity at the gable end Modify the north PUD boundary planting plan to match the plan approved by the city Commission (find attached north property line buffer plan - Woolbright Pace PUD). Submi t a cross access agreement document that describes legal access to the subject site through the The Vinings at Boynton Beach - Phase I, PUD. This document shall be submitted for review and not executed until it is approved by the city's legal staff. II. RECOMMENDATION(S): It is recommended tha~t\i v~~ ~ll court be relocated between Page 4 Memorandum 1st Review Vinings at ~~~~~ No. 96-200 - Major Site Plan Modification Boynton Beach Phase II the west end of buildings 8 and 12. It is recommended that melaleuca mulch be specified on the landscape plan for the planting beds. NOTE: If recommendations are approved, the working drawings required project. incorporate them into for permits for the :1stVINII,sp ~~~~~ RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #96-189 00 ~ :R ~ ~I: ~ I~ PLANNING A~D ZONING DEPT. To: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director John Wildner, Parks SUPerinlendentr Vinings at Boynton Beach - Phase II From: RE: Date: April 12, 1996 The Recreation and Park Department has reviewed the Masterplan Modification for the Vinings At Boynton Beach - Phase II. There are no recreation related comments. The project may continue through the normal review process. JW Department of Development, Engineering Div. Memo No. 96-132 Re: Vinings PUD Plat II - Master Plan Modification April II, 1996 Page #2 I 7. Provide stop signs and stop bars in accordance with the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices". Chap.23, Art.Iffi2, pg,23-7 18, Landscaped areas in parking lots must be protected by wheel stops or curbs, Chap.23, Art.IIE, pg.23-7 19, Concrete curb must conform to City standards. Chap.23, Art.IIE, pg.23-7 20. Provide 27' backup area, all stalls. Chap,23, Art.II,Il, pg.23-9 21, All parking lots shall meet or exceed State Handicap Code requirements and comply with the Standard Building Code and the Countywide amendments thereto. Chap,23, Art.IIK, pg.23-9 22. Provide a handicap stall within the visitor parking area. Chap.23, Art.lIK, pg.23- 9. Note: This parking area will require acceptable lighting. 23 Paint handicap pavement symbols white, Sheet 9 ofFDOT Index 17346 Recommendations: A. Consider constructing one-way out lane for a more efficient circulation pattern at the south end of the parking lot between building 3 & 4. B, Post the speed throughout the development at 25 mph, not 30 C, Consider continuous curb in lieu of wheel stop to reduce tripping hazard and to provide two additional feet of pervious area. WYH/ck C:VININGII fJ1ie City of '.Boynton '.Beach ill rnowm APR , I &16 ill 1 00 ~. 'Boynton 'Beach. 'Bouk'llaTrl P,o. ~310 'Boynton 'Bea&, 110rUfa 33425.0310 PHONB: (407) 375-6281 FAX: (407) 375-6357 PlANNING AND ZON!NG DEPT. OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER April 10, 1996 Trammell Crow Residential 6400 Congress A venue Suite 2000 Boca Raton, Florida 33487 Attention: Bettina Scherer Re: Vinings PUD Plat I & II Dear'Ms, Scherer: Our Police Department has requested a stop sign and stop bar at the east end ofthe Vining's entrance/exit road to stop eastbound traffic prior to making a turning movement. They have also requested a guard rail directly east ofthe same "T" intersection to divert vehicles away from the lake, Please install these improvements at your earliest convenience, Very truly yours, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA ~d!~I#M City Engineer WVH/ck xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager Marshall Gage, Police Chief Sgt, Harris, B.B, Traffic Division Mike Haag, Zoning/Site Administrator C:VINSIONS ~7Ua's gatewa1{ to tlU Gulfstrtam. TCR TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL 6400 Congress :'\n:nUl? Suite ~(JllO Boca Raton, FL 334H7 l-to7) lJ97-lJ700 FA.X (-to/) 997 -H64lJ r:- W/JL 0; :~ J April 3, 1996 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Mr. Michael Haag Planning and Zoning City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Re: Vinings at Boynton Beach - Phase" Dear Mike: Enclosed are three of the colored renderings for this project. One is a mountable version which you can use for your meetings and two are 8 1 /2 & 11 for your file. Please call me to confirm the schedule. Development Associate cc: Site Plan File PLANNING A~ ZONiNG DEPT. , . . #. . ij ..~~ %e City of !Boynton r;Beac/i ,. 100 'E. 'Boynton 'BctUli 'Boulevard P.G, '13o;r31O 'Boynton '13ctUli, ~{orida 33425-0310 City :J{af[: (407) i34-8111 ~!lLX: (407) 738-7459 ; · 1 ~, , '" OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR February 21, 1991 Tradewinds Development Corp. 902 Clint Moore Road , suite *124 Boca Raton, Florida 33487 RE: Woolbright Place P.U.D. - site Plan (Apartments) File No. 571 Gentlemen: Please be advised that on Tuesday, February 19, 1991, the City Commission approved the above-referenced site plan, subject to staff comments, copies of which are attached. Furthermore, the Community Appearance Board is requiring the following stipulations: a. Trees planted within the perimiter buffer areas are to be 12-14 feet in height and spaced 40 feet on center. --. b. All other trees planted on the site are to be a minimum of 12 feet in height. c. All ground mounted air-conditioning units are to be screened by shrubs. d. The relocation of existing on site landscaping is to be handled by City Staff. These plans were approved subj ect to your compliance with the attached stipulations and must now be modified to incorporate same. To initiate your sign-off procedure, please submit two (2) sets of modified plans to the Office of the site Development Division of the Building Department, which will record the required identification markings on each set of the modified plans. ' 5'lmerica's (jateway to tfze eju[/'itream _.~~..,.~~.~ ,~ . ,~~_, _,0 ~.~". -' '~-~ ~-~" '-~, ,~, """"". -"'~- .. ~- - ~.' '~,M_~:"'."'._"'.~'~'" ~'''N'''";.'