REVIEW COMMENTS
/
"
7. C. 1.
SITE PLANS
NEW SITE PLANS
THE VININGS AT BOYNTON BEACH
AND
THE VININGS II AT BOYNTON BEACH
"
~
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #94-273
SITE PLAN REVIEW
STAFF REPORT
FOR
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION
September 9, 1994
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Project Name: The Vinings at Boynton Beach and The Vinings II at
Boynton Beach
Applicant: TCR south Florida Apartments, Inc,
Agent: eeL Consultants Inc.
Location: East side of S.W. 8th Street, approximately 1,400
feet north of Woolbright Road
File No. : NWSP 94-007
Land Use Plan Designation:
Moderate Density Residential
(Development under court ordered
settlement stipulation)
Zoning District: Planned Unit Development (PUD)
Type of Use: Multi-Family Residential (apartments)
Number of units:
Total - 548; phase 1-252,
Phase II-296
Square Footage:
Site: 33.87 acres
Building: Footprint
Total floor area
1,475,193 sq. ft.
309,276 sq. ft.
760,459 sq. ft.
Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning District:
North -
Lake Boynton Estates, a single-family residential
neighborhood, zoned R-IA, single-family
residential, and an undeveloped part of Woolbright
Place, zoned PUD, Planned unit Development.
south -
Mortons Way (unimproved right-of-way) and farther
south is the Shoppes of woolbright, a partially
developed project, zoned PCD, Planned Commercial
District,
East
Seaboard Coastline Railroad tracks and farther east
is undeveloped land, zoned M-l, light industrial.
West
S.w, 8th Street (city street) and farther west is
undeveloped property, planned for a church, and a
man-made lake within Woolbright Place, zoned PUD,
Planned Unit Development.
Existing Site Characteristics:
undeveloped land.
The site is partially cleared,
Proposed Development:
recreational amenities.
finish floor.
Multi-story residential apartments with
Maximum overall height is 40 I -I" from
Concurrency: Drainage and Traffic - upon incorporation of staff
comments the concurrency requirements, as they pertain to the court
order, will be met.
Driveways: One ingress/egress entrance/driveway with security
gates is proposed off of S.W. 8th street.
I
page 2
staff report for The Vinings memorandum #94-273
Landscaping: The landscaping will meet code specifications and
buffer requirements when incorporation of staff comments are
complete.
Parking Facility: Upon incorporation of department comments, the
parking space count will be provided as per code;
Provided Required
Phase I
Phase II
Total
530
633
530
618
1,163
1,148
Building and Site Regulations: All building setbacks comply with
the setbacks established on the master plan. Since this is the
first development proposed for the woolbright Place PUD, the number
of units is within the number allowed per the stipulation agreement
and the total floor area is within the L.U.I. requirements.
Community Design plan: N/A - The project is not located within a
Community Design district. The building colors are earth tone and
the textured stuccoed walls are tan with a light accent color for
the trim. The finish roof material is tile and the color is also
earth tone. The stair and balcony handrails have a contrasting
dark green color that compliments the earth tone colors proposed
for the buildings.
signage: A comprehensive sign package is included as part of the
site plan submittal, The design of the signage is simple and not
obtrusive and the colors match colors proposed for the buildings.
It is recommended that additional signs be approved
administratively, if they meet the specifications of the sign code
and are aesthetically in harmony with the design and color of the
proposed signage. The sign code for PUDs was structured to not set
forth specific sign criteria due to the large variation of uses
allowed in PUDs.
REVIEW OF DEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS:
Below is a list of those departments that have comments regarding
this request.
DEPARTMENT
ATTACHED MEMORANDUM
Public Works
utilities
Fire
Police
Engineering
Building
Parks & Recreation
Forester/Environmentalist
planning and Zoning
#94-214
#94-280
#94-268
N/A
#94-265,94-262,94-259 and 94-245
#94-200
#94-321 and 94-293
#94-312 and 94-292
Memorandum dated August 31, 1994
Every department except the Police Department has comments. It is
anticipated that compliance with the staff comments will not
substantially change the concept of the project, therefore, staff
recommends the proj ect proceed through the approval process.
Compliance with all staff comments shall be incorporated into
permit set of drawings.
2
page 3
staff report for The Vinings memorandum #94-273
RECOMMENDATION:
The planning and Zoning Department recommends approval of the site
plan request, subject to the permit plans for the project being
amended to show compliance with staff comments and the applicable
city of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances.
~:6~a~frep.vin
3
'.
.
.
,.~
L
, .
i.
,
(~
I
I
Ir-
i ~'
I
, t
III !
Ii f
I ,
'-,Ii;;,;,;;1 iii i.. i i. i.~i -'...............
lilllili!!111 ji if i jiiiii' fliiiiiiiiliiiftlij, ;
!!iq I'il !i'II, 1/111'. /1111111 I II i
!i I i I ~: ! i,' i!! I Ii l! II, II" II! Ill', P III
,. p jll' I I I I,
iil! I! 1111 i : Ii:m iiiiiiiiiiiii i ii
~'I'11 II"l'" 'r" .................
'I I' I I' t I,' " 'I....'.......... i.
. ~ ,I .' ..,.... I'" I. . ..
I " . I
!I. . I "1 'ft'PI'1 "'1"1"'1"11'"
'I': II 11" II~ 'f.li ~ 11:11'111111' II
I. I I " II : I I II'
:" ' I I. , II Ill:
I I; / ' I
. I .
I I I
.
ill -( if
II1II 'I
I I
"
- I .
I I f
'"t I
I
l
t
I
III
.
.
,
III
..
:II
...
...
...
10: !
,'J. ...
": ~
I ;
t , 'iii
JI
: il:
. I' I
t.'I'
,I , :
'I
~i' ,. i 'I
~~i i':: ii'
~ -1.1 i 11,1- -,
"''':. . _.i
i r'-, , it
. ~~:i,". ~
, I
'U(
'I I
h(
Ii,
jH~E ViNINGSAT""i30VTONB. EACH
~ . . ".' ..
" ",ORTqWS WAY,
.~
, v-"..,.. ,... ,...
! i ;':il"';
;, f ;.- ',,:~ij
- . jl:~:
:: .lah
:'1
/:li
" IIESIOfNTIAL APARTMENT, ~v' DEVElOPED BV
TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL
, IOCA IlATO!t, fLORID" '
R Rj'
4
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #94-214
TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
DATE: August 24, 1994
SUBJ: Site Plan Review - 2nd Review - The Vinings at Woolbright
Place
Comments pertain~ng to the dumpster at the above location have been
addressed, however the locations that do not have a direct approach
should have approximately a 25 to 30 approach. These matters can
be handled at the time of permitting.
The plans should be forwarded to the Planning and Development
Board/Community Redevelopment Advisory Board for review.
RE/cr
Eichorst
Works ~irector
~
MEMORANDUM
Utilities #94-280
TO: Tambri J. H
Planning &
DATE: August 24, 1994
FROM: John A. Guidry,
Director of Utili tie
SUBJECT: The Vinings at Woolbright Place - Second Review
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offers the following comments:
The Utilities Department offers the following with respect to Item #7 of Utilities Memorandum
#94-265 dated August 11, 1994:
1. Indicate proper removal or abandonment of existing force mains, abandoned
sanitary sewer manholes and old lift station can.
2. The installation and Full Release for Service by the Palm Beach Health
Department of all water, sanitary sewer and force mains necessary to support
the propos~d project prior to the Utilities Director's signature on the
HRSIDER. Applications for Permit to Construct the Domestic Water and
Waste Water Systems to this project (Sec. 26.12).
3. The minor relocations of water services and water mains as shown on these
preliminary drawings as required by the Utility Department Director. These
and other necessary changes must be incorporated into the plans submitted
for HRS permits (Sec. 26-12).
4. The capacity reservation fee for this project, based on 23, 2 inch meters, will
be $31,240.44. This fee will be due within thirty days of City Commission
approval or at time of HRS application submittal to this office. The
reservation fee is renewable after one year. As an option, capital facility
charges may be paid in full, in advance, in order to avoid the reservation fee
(Sec. 26-34 [E]).
It is our recommendation that the request proceed through the review process,
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter
Mazzella at 375-6404,
19b
xc:
Clyde "Skip" Milor
Peter Mazzella &--
Mark Law
File
"Iff;
U W IE 1m
? 5 7QQA di.
I
{p
FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 94-268 WDC
TO:
Planning Department
FROM:
Fire Department
DATE:
August 26, 1994
RE:
The vinings Apartments
Woolbright Place
As presented we have no objections to this project.
If a proposed split of this project should be requested, a separate
review of each phase will be required. One of the most pressing
concerns will be an additional water line to the southeast portion
of the project.
~4~-,pd:~~
William D.I Cavanaugh, FPO .
Boynton Beach Fire Dept.
rn'
Allr, ? r
moo
'r"<r"\ f'
rpLi,:Nt~:n. .
ZONING ULt'l
7
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-265
FROM:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning & zoning Director
~~m ~ukill, P.E.
~,~ Eng1.neer
August 24, 1994
TO:
DATE:
RE:
VININGS - THIRD REVIEW
Based on the change of direction of the applicant towards
submitting two separate plats for subject P.U.D., our earlier
comments are incomplete. with respect to the twenty specific items
enumerated in our August 22, 1994 memo and the comments of Mr.
Finizio, all still generally apply. We have the following
additional comments:
21. Parking
between
22. Provide
Board.
23. Parking
islands must have a minimum of 5 feet of landscaping
backs of curbs.
an impact statement from the Palm Beach County School
stall length is minimum 16' from curb stop to drive.
These comments are incomplete with respect to the new subdivision
proposal, particularly with respect to the entry road, cross-
agreements, sidewalks, etc.
WVH/ck
C:VININGS.3RD
xc: vincent Finizio, Dep. City Engineer
@, ~ @ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1
\& ~ '- 5 \OOA l~
.... -.,-....- --- ,.
8
-
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-262
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
ila ning & Zoning Director
. iam HUkill, P.E.
" .
Engl.neer
August 22, 1994
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
VININGS - SECOND REVIEW
Regarding our August lIth comments on subject submittal, be advised
as follows:
A. Comments now acceptable; 7,9,lO,15 & 16.
B. Comments which can be dealt with later and should not effect
current review; 1,2,4,5,ll,13,14,18,19 & 20*.
C. Comments which are not completed:
3. Survey. Note #2 on survey indicates possible existence of
additional deeds, easements or other instruments. Chapter
5-144(b) requires all easements and other encumbrances be
shown.
6. Drainage easement SW corner cannot be abandoned until
drainage from PCD to the south is rerouted and accepted.
8. Inlets must be in grassy areas unless adequate
documentation is presented to support something different.
12. Wheel stops. Drawings are incomplete.
17. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local &
collector streets and on one side of all marginal access
streets. This includes, but is not limited to, SW 8th
Street. (See Appendix C, Art. IX, Sec. 11).
D. Additional comments (see attachment Engineering Memo 94-259).
*In response to applicant's inquiry regarding #20, proof of unity
will be required by surety prior to forwarding to City commission.
WVH/ck
C:VININGS.2ND
attachment
rn
Mowrn
ill
AUG 2 2 i99Ll
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
cr
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO 94-259
TO:
william Hukill, P.E., City Engineer
FROM:
vincent A. Finizio, Deputy City Engineer
DATE:
August 22, 1994
RE:
The Vinings at Boynton Beach
Regarding the above referenced project, I recommend the following:
1. The sidewalks along SW 8th Street, at the main entrance to
this project, be continued along the internal roadway to a
point south of the recreation area (where the roadway meets
the parking facility situated southside of project), and to a
point north of the recreation facility where the internal
roadway intersects with the first handicap parking stall.
Additionally, I recommend that an internal sidewalk system be
created which would link all buildings to the recreational
area via a pedestrian sidewalk system geared to assist
handicapped individuals in accessing these required amenities.
2. Regarding C~L's notation on sheet 1 of 2 wherein the plans
indicate "all mailboxes to be located in breezeways", the
applicant shall coordinate with the U.S. Postal Service in
depicting upon these plans, a location for general mail
delivery. The plans should then be revised to depict the
location of the mail delivery facility as well as provisions
for some form of organized parking or staging area for persons
picking up their mail.
3. The plans should depict the construction of grassy swales
which are fully irrigated and maintained within the public
rights-of-way of SW 8th Street and Morton's Way.
4. The pedestrian sidewalk along SW 8th Street should continue
thru the ingress/egress approach and be so transitioned as to
facilitate the movement of handicapped individuals thru this
area.
5. The 5' pedestrian sidewalk at the extreme southwest corner of
the property (intersection of Morton' Way at SW 8th Street),
should be extended to provide handicap accessibility from this
site to the pavement area of Morton's Way (City standard -
Handicap connections at intersections).
6. Engineering plans & Architectural plans do not compliment one
another regarding sidewalk location. Resolve plan conflicts.
VAF/ck
C:VININGS.VAF
/0
"
,
I
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-245
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
ftfJt~iam ~ukill, P.E.
{AI~jJ Eng1.neer
August 12, 1994
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
THE VININGS - SITE PLAN REVIEW
Attached please find the Engineering Department comments for the
above referenced project.
WVH/ck
C:VININGS.COV
/1
- J'.NtJ U'H,I~Hl.I'H; tH'" I IIU l-II',N l'
CI'fY OF BOYN'fON BEACH
. .. - . ~ . .
Lon R. Boynton Beach Blvd.
loynton Beach, Fl 33435
Phone: (407) 738-7487
PLAN'S
Name of Reviewer If(jit./C-L I ritu.--
Type of Review 0vGrL-
R.E:V:J: EW COM:M::E:.'N'TS
Permi t *
projec~ t/(/vllvftt:J~
Da te of Rev iew
Avh ((, IClef'!
/
Contractor
The Engineering Department sather applicable City departments have reviewed your
permit application and supporting documentation and have determined that your
submittal does not comply with the City of Boyn~on Beach Code of Ordinances as
described below I see attached sheets if applicable), Please rectify the plans to
comply with the code comments and resubmit two (2) complete corrected sets of
plans to the Building Department for re-review. If you have any q\1estions
regarding a comment, you inay call to speak with the reviewer who made the specific
comment. (The reviewer. affiliated depar~ment and applicable phone number are
indicated at the top of each comment .he.t). If the oomment cannot be rectified
by a phone aal1, a oonferenoe may be .oheduled. If a Qonference i. nece..ary, an
appointment is recommended to assure that the reviewer is available. To expedite
the re-review process, changes may be made by the designer to the permit documents
at the Building Department. Proof of authorization is required prior to making
changes to signed and sealed documents by anyone other than the design
professional responsible for the drawings. Timely approval of your project is
based upon your prompt response to the comments. Please advise us if we can be
of assistance to you in the re-review process.
*w*****************************************************************************
Applicant's Comments rec'd. by: Comments
phone B Name (print): only
Date called & caller's (signature): Plan~
initials: 1st Date: comments_
2nd 3rd
*******************************************************************************
l. Revise documents to reflect all comments.
2. Excavation and/or fill permits will be required. (See Chapter 8).
3. Survey must comply with Chapter 4, Section 7, Paragraph 7. 1 of Land
Development Regulations, Part III, including but not limited to, deeds,
easements or other instruments recorded in public record.
4. Provide site drainage calculations/proposed modifications.
5. Need approval from SFWMD prior to Engineering acceptance if system is
modified.
6. Drainage easement SW corner cannot be abandoned until drainage from
PCD to the south is rerouted and accepted.
7. Provide certification by Developer's Engineer that drainage plan
complies with all City codes & standards. (See Chapter 5, Article X,
and Appendix C).
8. Inlets must be in grassy areas unless adequate documentation is
presented to support something different.
9. Minimum 15" pipe must be used in storm system. (See Appendix C, Art. X
Section SA).
10. Parking lot dimensions, striping, aisles, stalls, radii, signs,
landscaping etc.must conform with City codes & standards. (See Chapter
5, Article X).
11. Provide handicap ramp & sidewalk locations. (DCA Accessibility
Requirements Manual).
12. Wheel stops or curb required, all stalls. (Chapter 5, Article X).
13. Photometries must be approved for both pedestrian and parking lot
lighting before building permit can be issued.
14. County road entrance sign requires P.B.C. and F.D.D.T. approvals.
15. Remove references to Broward County standards.
16. Maximum spacing of planting breaks/islands is lO spaces. (See Chapter
5, Article X).
17. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local & collector streets
and on one side of all marginal access street. This includes, but is
not limited to, SW 8th Street. (See Appendix C, Art. IX, Sec. ll).
18. Developer's attention is directed to Appendix C, Article VIII, Section
7, regarding future surety requirements.
19. Verify which roads/aisles require naming (for mail delivery) with u.S.
Postal Service.
20. Provide proof of unity of title.
/2
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 94-200
August 26, 1994
TO:
Tambri Heyden
Planning D1:o'r ctor
Don Jaeger
Building 0 cial
Al Newbold
Deputy Building Official
THRU:
FROM:
RE:
TRC COMMENTS - SITE PLAN REVIEW (2ND REVIEW)
THE VINI!\"GS AT WOOLBRIGHT PLACE
S. W. 8TH STREET - NORTH OF WOOLBRIGHT ROAD
The Building Department has reviewed the amended site plan and
offers the following comments:
1. Show all sidewalks and ramps on the plans to make the site,
pool and buildings handicapped accessible.
2. The modification from the South Florida Water Management
District does not address this project. We need
confirmation from them that the approval has been modified
for the proposed project.
3. The site plan does not reflect the sign locations. They
need to be identified on the plans and be in compliance with
the Sign Code.
Since the above comments can be addressed at time of building
permit submittal, we recommend that the plans be forwarded to the
Planning and Development Board. However, if there is any
deviation from this set of plans to coincide with comments made
by the applicant at the August 23, 1994 Technical Review
Committee meeting, another review will be required.
Al~
AN : bh
ill
m @ ~ OJ
AliG
f I'
e/
VININGS
PlANNING AND /1
ONING DEPT. U
13
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #94-321
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent jt)
The Vinings of Boynton Beach at Woolbright Place - Site Plan (amended)
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
August 26, 1994
--------------------------------------------
The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the amended site plan for the Vinings. The
following comments are submitted:
1. Recreation & Park Department comments for Woolbright Place dated August 9, 1994
(Memorandum N{;. 94-293) remain in effect.
2. The Vinings has il1dicated that they wish to apply for 1/2 credit towards the Recreation &
Park dedication requirement. It appears there is sufficient private recreation to qualifY, Five
(5) private recreation elements provided are listed on the site plan:
I. Fitness Center
2. Swimming Pool
3. Tennis Courts
4. Tot Lot (children's playground)
5. Family picnic (barbecue) areas
3. The Developer has agreed that Recreation & Park equipment provided will be commercial
grade or better of size and capability to serve the residents of the development. Specifications
for equipment will be submitted prior to requests for permit.
JW:bjm
rn
rn @ rn 0 Wi rn rr.J,
: I
Al:C. ._-
.~ '-.j .
L
PlANNING AND I, 7'1
Z NING DEPT. (J/
/1
I
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM 194-293
FROM:
Tarnbri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent ~~
Charles C. Frederick, Director~~
Recreation & Park Department \~
TO:
THROUGH:
RE:
woolbright Place P.U.D. (MasterPlan Modification)
DATE:
August 9, 1994
The Recreation & Park Department h;as reviewed the MasterPlan
modification for woolbright Place P.U.D. The following comments
are submitted:
1. In 1990, the city and Tradewinds Development Corporation
entered into an agreement regarding the park and recreation
areas required for the development of Woolbright Place P.U.D.
As a part of agreement, Tradewinds agreed to provide certain
improvements to a proposed park near the P.U.D. if that park
was developed within a three year period.
2. Value for these improvements was set at $75,000. In the event
that the City failed to generate park plans within three
years, Tradewinds agreed to pay the City $60,000 cash in lieu
of the land dedication required. .
'3. At the time of site plan approval for the residential
development, Tradewinds must establish evidence of entitlement
for 50% credit for private open space.
4. In the event that Tradewinds failed to meet these criteria,
then Tradewinds agreed to forfeit that portion of a surety
bond equal to 4.5 acres of property.
5. Resolution of this matter is required prior to this
department's approval of the MasterPlan modifications. A copy
of the agreement is attached.
CC: Carrie Parker, city Manager
Jim Cherof, City Attorney
File
~NNING "-NO
tONING OE?l
JW: ad
, ,
l5
...--
......
RECREATION & PARKS MEMORANDUM #94-312
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning, Zoning, Community Improvement
Kevin 1. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist -k~ ~
The Vinings - New Site Plan Modification
FROM:
RE:
DA TE:
August 22, 1994
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The applicant has responded to the original memo #94-292 with the attached comments
#VIII:
Item # 1 - Completed
Item #2 - I will review and approve the plan prior to the land clearing permit being issued.
Item #3 - This issue should be resolved through the City Attorney's office.
The project should continue in the normal review process.
KJH:bjm
CC: James Cherof, City Attorney
m u w rn
\"D} ~
l\.l\) U; 2 6 lOO~
PlANNING AND
NING DEPT.
/(P
ill
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM 194-292
FROM:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Department
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist ~)~
The Vinings At Boynton Beach - Site Plan
Major Site Plan Modification
TO:
RE:
DATE:
August 8, 1994
These comments pertain to the requirements of the City's Tree
Preservation Ordinance.
1. There are existing trees on the site which in part were
approved for management under the Tree Management Book
document prepared by Stanley Consultants of Florida, Inc.
January 30, 1990. This document addresses the thirty-two (32)
acre commercial parcel immediately north of the Home Depot
site to the industrial access road. The applicant should
review this document and agree to comply with the contents in
full. The included aerial map indicates fifteen areas
(letters B-P) of existing trees with varying quantities of
tree preservation, relocation and clearing.
2. A similar document to #1 above has not been submitted to the
City for approval for the residential portion of this project.
This document is required under the Tree Preservation
Ordinance, [chapter 7.5, 4b, pg. 595] which pertains to all
undeveloped property in the City. The specific requirements
are from section 7.5-7d, pg. 597]. This item was previously
addressed in April 1992 when the site was called Woolbright
Place Apartments. (See attached memo).
3. I have not been made aware of the results of a Tradewinds
Draft Agreement between the city and Tradewinds (memo #94-185
City Manager) regarding any other environmental inquiries
about this portion of the Tradewinds sites.
KH:ad
CC: Charles C. Frederick, Director, Recreation & Park Dept.
Dr
('
00 ~
"
. ,.j
IYJ
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM 192-139
TO: Chris Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist ~~ 11--
Charles C. Frederick, Director I~ f-)
Recreation & Park Department
April 14, 1992
WOOLBRIGHT PLACE APTS. : TREE MANAGEl\1ENT PLAN
THROUGH:
DATE:
RE:
This memorandum is in reference to the above project requirement
for a tree management plan. The basis for this requirement is
from the Tree Preservation Ordinance Chapter 7.504b p. 595 which
pertains to all vacant or undeveloped property (Ord. No.81-21,
7-7-81). The specific requirements are from section 7.5-7d p.
597. This information has informally been called the tree
management plan, although it is not addressed as such in this
section.
The requirement of a document addressing the eventual status of
all trees on the site is in conjunction also with section 7.5-12
A-E. Section 7.5-13 speaks to the permit to relocate trees, one
of the components usually included in a "document" addressing the
eventual status all trees on the site. All these requirements
have been in effect since 1981.
KH: ad
r.11G
ID
n 1998
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
/B
MEMORANDUM NO. 94-185
TO:
Tambri Heyden, City Planner
Don Jaeger, Building Official
John Gui dry, Utilities Director
Charlie Frederick, Recreation & Park Director
FROM:
DATE:
Carrie Parker, City Manager
May 31,1994
Please review the draft agreement attached between the City and Tradewinds. I
realize that many of the items are specified as included on the attachments, and we do
not have any attachments yet.
We have requested Mr. Morton to provide those as soon as possible and will forward
them on to you when received. We are trying to get this item ready for the June 21 st
agenda. Please forward your comments directly to the attorney with copies to me.
Thank you.
{~ AJ-
Carrie Parker
City Manager
CP:jb
attach.
-arM,mem
/1
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM '94-215
FROM:
Jim Cherof, City Attorney
Charles C. Frederick, Director~
Recreation & Park Department ~~
TO:
DATE:
Tradewinds Draft Agreement
June 9, 1994
RE:
Upon review of the draft agreement, I find no reference to the park
dedication issues and payment of money due from Tradewinds which
you and I have discussed previously.
Has this been mistakenly left out or do you plan to pursue this in
another way?
Item #4 regarding environmental inquiries is interesting. Is this
being suggested by Tradewinds or by us. I would think such
outlined procedure isn't appropriate for an agreement, but would
simply be issued as a direction to staff from the City Manager's
Office if the City agrees with this policy. I do not know why
Tradewinds should dictate to us how and when responses to
environmental inquiries are handled.
CCF:ad
XC: Carrie Parker, City Manager
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
20
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
MEMORANDUM
Tambri Heyden
planning & Zoning Director
Michael E. Haag~~
Zoning and Site e elopment
August 31, 1994
Administrator
Site Plan
Project:
Review - 2nd Review - New Site Plan
The vinings at Boynton Beach and The vinings II
at Boynton Beach
Woolbright Place PUD
CCL Consultants, Inc.
NWSP 94-007
Location:
Agent:
File No:
The following is a list of comments regarding the second review of
the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments
are divided into two (2) categories:
The first category is a list of comments that identify unresolved
comments either from the first review or ne'~ comments as a result
of the second review. To show compliance with these comments will
not substantially alter the configuration of the site and the
design of the building.
The second category is a list of recommendations I believe will
enhance the aesthetics and function of the project.
All comments and recommendations can be rectified on the plans at
time of permitting if the site plan request is approved. The
applicant must understand that additional comments may be generated
upon review of the documents and working drawings submitted to the
Building Department for permits for the proposed project.
I.
1.
.,
"- ,
3 .
4 .
SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS:
Submit a survey of the subject property that does not show a
phase line.
specify on the plans the height of the dumpster enclosures and
identify the color of the walls for the single enclosure.
Specify on the elevation view drawings the manufacturer of the
colors proposed for the buildings. Add to the elevation view
drawings of the recreation buildings the color, color number
and manufacturer for each exterior finish material depicted on
the drawings.
Submit a cost estimate, to be reviewed by city staff, for the
five (5) required recreation amenities, A bond adjustment
shall be made, within 30 days of the city's approval of the
es~imate: by phases, based on the value of these improvements.
Pursuant to condition 5D, page 6 of 7 of the October 17, 1990
agreem'3nt between TradeHinds and the city.
5.
The total number of parking spaces, by phases, identifie~ in
the parking calculations are in the wrong column. COIT:3Ct
accordingly,
~l
page 2 2nd review comments The Vinings
6. Phase I is four parking spaces deficient. show and list no
less than the required number of parking spaces for Phase I.
7. Landscaping - Correct the following deficiencies:
a. north buffer - The required landscape buffer is shown
over an easement in the wrong location (sheet LP-1
section A) .
b. vehicle use area visual barrier - On the plant list
indicate 24" on center spacing for required perimeter
hedge material.
c. tree preservation - Delineate the trees required from the
tree preservation ordinance analysis, incorporate same
into the landscape plan.
d. Add the following notes to the landscape drawing:
i. Indicate that plantings may be field adjusted due
to interference with structures.
ii. The code spacing specifications for required
shrubbery, hedges or trees supersedes the number
shown under quantities in plant list.
e. Place a note on the plan that indicates the requirements
of landscape code section 7.5-35 (c)(2) shall apply when
nuisance species of tree are used (example - Use of Ficus
Benj amina) .
f. On the section view drawings of each berm indicate the
overall height of the berms and/or identify the slope,
Note the height shall not be less than the original
approval of four (4) feet for the berm required along the
north property line and five (5) feet for the berm
required along the east property line. What are you
proposing for the height of the berm identified as
Section C?
g. Modify the tabular data and plans to be consistent with
the code specifications regarding the landscaping for the
following sections of the landscape code; multifamily
housing developments, foundation landscaping, required
landscaping adj acent to public rights-of-way and abutting
properties, and interior landscaping.
h. Add to the plans the hedging required on the north side
of the property line that separates the Vinings project
from the 14 acre parcel. This material shall be
installed with the Vinings landscaping.
1.
Indicate on the landscape that the landscaping
fencing required between the Vinings project and the
acre parcel shall be completed prior to a certificate
occupancy being issued for the first building in phase
and
14
of
1.
8. Pr~vide a copy of the city approved and recorded homeowners'
association document prior to the issuance of building
permits,
9, Provide updated tabular data that shows that the L.U.I. of
5.00 is being complied with, consistent with the overall PUD
maximum permitted floor area.
10. Show on the site plan and/or landscape plan the type, size and
location of the fencing required to separate the Vinings
project from the 14 acre parcel.
ot~
page 3 2nd review comments The Vinings
11. Add a distinguishable symbol and notes to the landscape plan,
paving & drainage plan and site plan drawings that indicate
what and when improvements will be completed for phase I.
show on the landscape plan the line that represents the limits
of construction for Phase I.
13. with a distinguishable symbol indicate on the elevation view
drawings what color from the color chart represents the colors
for the following exterior finish material: textured stucco,
smooth stucco, cedar fascia, decorative gable end vents, solid
doors, sliding glass door frames and window frames.
II. RECOMMENDATION(S):
1. It is recommended that the remaining signage (not shown) be
reviewed and approved administratively, if the new signage is
consistent with the requirements of the sign code and the
colors match the colors of the signage approved with this site
plan. If not, the signage shall be brought before the planning
and Development Board and the city commission for approval as
a modification to the existing site plan.
2. It is recommended that the developer pay $60,000.00 park fee
to the city of Boynton Beach at the earlier of the two
following dates:
1. Issuance of building permits for the first building in
Phase I or II.
or
..,
'- ,
January 10, 1995.
The fee is regarding the 1990 Parks and Recreation agreement
between the City and Tradewinds Development Corporation,
condition 4.A or 4.B.
NOTE: If recommendations are approved, incorporate them into the
working drawings required for permits for the project.
MEH/jj
a:spl"ev2nd,vin
1
~3
i Ii
1::1 .
II ! 1 -. ~
I .',
p fl ca.,..
,.,.;,-
, .. "t
:iHit..r'i
o 1/8
TIIII I \ .
'0 400, '800 NFEE~__ . s'" ' ,~ ,~~~~--:--=-l i,!
, ,-- ~ -,' l~r T 1 ( ! \' I I 11-;1 /
I'S ~ \'1 ' ,I j, ,~
- .
I I
_ ___ ____ ______________u__._.___,__________._~_.,______ .-..----
;....l.
I:..'~r .'
':.';'.! "
,\,",.., )
!
. '~t:
,,'
, "
J ';
'I: "
l,
,,'
"
"
~
'1;
",
'. ~- \ .' '
:',
::::'!i~;~(~~l .1,
,1,~r'I>?'''')'(: .,1.'
· I "},~;;1r~[f;f ',.,'
. '1l(;~~{ ,;,!~:.~'~;, .
;", .J!f.~p~".r"'f. lit, ,~,
.;J},~~ ~:;::fi.!f'\~;J~~J' .... ."
, , ;i~ I,~; t;;r~;r .... ';. ':... ,.:
\ ,\. ., ~"'fj y. 'It,,r.
fl,- ,!1~~1 ~~'~ j~"~"';{,:.' I
,,' ';:~~,,:-,>(:!r'
.'~';~\1~!',,;' <
~;;~~I~I~i;"
({' ..... ..r, '. _
':.1\:~~(::Jii:~J;;,~/r\': , "
,l 'r /;,' "', ',":
I' ; .l.~l~;.' '1;: ~:~'.#~:;i ~;-~.':
, :: ';::,;;; ~,;~. ': " "
,1
. A... '."\
"
"
,r'
;'1
. ,.'
I,
, ~.,
, ~ .
,.)~~., I; ,J.'.
, ,
1.,,-
:'- !'
, I,'
,,';, ,.".')
.. ~ II.. ~ ' . ".' .... '."
/ . ...<~tt,;1!!g;;:'
".,"".' , i.::'
.' . .: 'J', '" "~;:" , I
',1.
';.--;.':'
..
"~'(,ft:'1':;'
'. .
,;. '~:':~' ,
,:';t'\~(~f;:2.'':i,
" ';'_"". '.'t:!
, ! '.'p'
i .
i
I
FILE NO:
.:'i'
'I'
! '"
I
"
.
,~ }~
\ .
\'., ,
,
..
,
.' t ' ' ...
,I'
i,
',I'
.., {t,:,~~~,;?"'!
(I .
, '
; i ii ;'-.'
........
I"~
::','.~~~~tr({ri.,.,
1,''.'1;, .
"
:',:);~~w>i;;:. .
" ;"1.
,..:
",...',Y'- ,~'.i
','
\' ;1'
,; ~ ~;;
. .1"
~ ",' .
, I
!', ../
-I.:
!, "
r ~ j'
,1 "
j:_ "V
....:
;' '~ ":;~::', .
" "',;\:'.:~.i,'...,~f~:; .'
:.. \~, I' '~'_ :
.,.'
;,
"
."
:IJ
o
Z
~CD
>c
Z;=
_ 00
e :IJZ
" mGl
Hi:;!
m"O
rm
m_
,::=
~
6
z
~)?""'~~~~
~~ (i:l t. '> ~ '\."
~ " ~ ~ c.. ~ '"'
l--...'t. ') 't ~ '~~
V ~ ~~, ().~
~ C. 1:. C .,..
.., ~
en'"
-c
0-
mr
- 0
~ m-
.. rZ
. mGl
"' ~:;!
0"0
z~
~~
0;=
mo
~ mz
, r Gl
,m
!: ~~
6~
z=
."
:IJ
o
Z
~
>'"
z~
Or
; :IJ2
, mz
~ ~ Gl
m:;!
r"O
mm
~-
6
z
~'
~
~~- ~
-~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~- -\.-V'
-0 \~ ~
-S)
-t:..
\
~ -
~