Loading...
LEGAL APPROVAL . I., f:GA '''' APPROVAl" DOCUMENTS , MINUTES - PLANNINr-~D DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH. FL.DA SEPTEMBER 13. 1994 /~ / ) ...-' /' building penmit, whichever comes first. He feels the payment will be made in January given the process the applicant will be going through. As of today, the developer has acknowledged that payment is due to the Cit.Y-t'"}nd at a time cer- tain. Mr. Wohlfarth is hopeful the City Commission ~i-Hf ~.i'cept this proposal from the developer.," " / A lthough a Fi cus hedge/will grow very rapidly{'Cha i nman Lehnertz suggested us i n9 native alternatives which would work as weyr, and grow as thickly and almost as rapidly as the Fjeus. He recommended a Florida Privet or Coco Plum. Mr. Wohlfarth reque~ted an opportunity to/work with staff during the process with regard to sp~cies. He pointed out,tfiat everyone is attempting to work with xeriscape ~.s' much as Possible,.. but'if itis deeme..d. to.. bey? able by either side, tha-t it be an option alo~ with the Ficus.,;/'" / //', ,/ './ >>" ",' Vice,.ehainman Dube aSked wb-ether there will bectwo homeo 'ers' associations with ~ ~ster association for:/thiS d~"elopment.Mf~ Wohlf .' h said the multi-family ~ ~ rental project w~}Ch will/be mainta,Yted by an /erall association. There /is a potential;thatjflere CQ1J1d be a sjctrgle-famil project, but tonight's master ..... plan is for ~he mU,};;-ti-fami;l'y project,./ Vice ChaJ an Dube explained that if . there are two diJ.ferent,maintenan;.~' companies/l/one side could be growing, while the otheriside,}'s not.;/Problenls"may arise,pegarding who should maintain the hedge. ~ma~t'er assQ-ciation,!-~>tutting andc:ma.intaining totally, would eliminate any proll el1J/ Mr. ~0'hl fart,;~/sa id that wlt'h regard to the ma i ntenance of the face of t~~ heQge on t~ mul~i~family site,will be maintained by Trammell Crow and its b dizarieSi Reg~ding the topp'1ng of the hedge, he committed to topping the ire hed at )11e same time. ,;/ .' ~J, .: ~ >>,Ii.' j Motion / ff ," /, , / ," Mr. Golden ed to recommen~app~pval of the master plan modification for the Woolbright Place PUD submi ed ~ " oward Scharlin, Trustee, for modifications to the approved master plan i ude revised access points off SW 8th Street and Morton's Way, a phasing /subdivided multi-family parcels and a landscape buffer and setbacks bet the subdivided parcels, subject to staff comments. Vice Chainman Dube seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. ~ EXCEPTION TO PLATTING ?-- .- _..~_..- .. . (Agenda materials for this request will be distri- buted at the meeting. A complete application has not yet been received.) The Vinings at Boynton Beach Howard Scharlin, Trustee Richard Wolfarth, CCl Consultants, Inc. Northeast corner of SW 8th Street and Morton's Way Request to further subdivide Tract C, the undeveloped multi-family/duplex designed parcel of Woolbright Place Plat No.1, by splitting the 33.87 acre parcel into two parcels. This,application was withdrawn by the applicant and, therefore, it was deleted earlier in the meeting. 2. Project Name: Owner: Agent: Location: Description: 15 - MINUTES _ PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 13. 1994 1. Pal. walk Conditional Use - ThiS ACLF was approved subject to staff comments and with two additional remarkS. The City commiSsion requested gates on the dumpster. However. there will be no dumpster. There will be can pickuP with a dumpster enclosure. The height reduction. which was recommended by staff, was not approved. 2. Palm walk _ community Design Plan Appeal - This Item was approved and the City Commission endorsed the Planning & Development Board'S opinion. 3. ~Inlngs _ Exception to Platting - This Item was approved as sub- mitted. MS. Heyden asked for Input from the Board on her new practice of mailing Inform- ation packages when Board members are on vacation. Messrs. Golden and Walsh felt this was a very good Idea, Chairman Lehnert% reconmended that members advise the Planning and Zoning Department. as well as the city Clerk's Office. when they will be on vacation so that staff knows whether or not to mall the packets. OLD BUSINESS - None NaI BUSINESS - A. PUBLIC HEARING ABM~EKt The v,ning, lt Boynton 'elch CCl Consultants, Inc. Howard Scharlin, Trustee East side of S~ 8th street, approximatelY 1,400 feet north of ~oolbright Road Request for abandonment of a 20' wide drainage easement located near the southwest corner of the property. Mr. Haag made the presentation, A locator map was used to display the area whiCh Is located In the woolbright Place PUO, ThiS will be an apartment complex consisting of 548 units, The drainage easement Is approximatelY 203' long and 20' wide. 1. project Name: Agent: OWner: location: Description: ThiS drainage easement was created when Home Depot. located In the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD. was established. The drainage from that project workS Its way onto this project. The stormwater IS ultimatelY diSCharged Into a lake. When the site Is developed. there will be buildings In the location of the easement. , The applIcant wIll reroute the draInage so that It will connect Into the existing infrastructure located under S~ 8th Street. ..- s and the Planning and Zoning Departments are In favor of this for aba donment. One condition, recommended by staff. requests , ~ " n doptlng tQe abandonment of the drainage easement not be '_~Igned by the CI y__COmnlsslon until after the Infrastructure is In place and . '. worl141l till .rt -the drainage off tile property, The city Engineer is In agreement with this condition. The applicant has agreed with the stipulation. ? - 1( MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA AUGUST 16. 1994 If it is landscaped as nicely CJ.S" the plans indicate, it/,t'S going to be a project to be proud of. / /p ,/~ // Motion / ~c r ,f / Commissioner Aguila moAd to grant the apPliccvrt a waiver of the Community Des i gn Pl an. Commi ;roner Katz seconded th~!,,moti on. /// Mayor Harmening poA'nted out that it sits pfght in the middle of ~yr;white tile roofs and it WOUld' look strange to have,.;s'omething else on it. ~'believed this was not on the . onsent Agenda because ?f the canvas over the 8prte-cochere, not because anyone objected to the roof ./The only problem he haQr'with canvas rather than a solidoof with white tile on/it, is that canvas dettriorates and can become rath, unslightly unless it/is renewed on a regular/basis. In addition, it has at, dency to blow around i'n a heavy wi nd. ' < '. d ' " er Aguila stated that'they have come a 10nQ./way on the vinyl aryd nylon materia they use as opposedto canvas. They tend .:to keep thei r col or '1 onger:,.-- tend t be tied on considerably tighter, and tend pO last longer. However, ..'-'---_ poorl maintained, or use o.f a cheap product, can,/result in exactly what Mayor Harm ning said. He guessed, based on the quality he has seen to th'is point, tha this is probably not'going to be the case .here. " / ~c M yor Pro Tem Bradley asked if staff is OPPO~d to the- canvas ,because of it~/' endency to deteriorat.e and fade. Ms. Heyd,n stated that staff pretty mucg' echoes the Mayorl s cortments. ' / / I ,/ ~ llnendment to Motio?,' /<- / Commissioner AgUi~a moved to allow th~se of the whit !~ement tile canvas awnings ~~ presented this e~ng. Commission r Katz second motion, which 'rried 5-0. J/ Vote on Mai the The motion to grant the applicant a waiver of the Community Design Plan also carried 5-0. The Vinings at Boynton Beach F~PL '1'1" ()()J, Howard Scharlin, Trustee Richard Wolfarth, C.C.L. Consultants, Inc. EXCEPTION TO PLATTING: Request to subdivide a 33.87 acre parcel from Tract C, the undeveloped, multifamily/duplex designated parcel of Woolbright Place, Plat No. 1 Ms. Heyden stated that Richard Wolfarth of C.C.L. Consultants, Inc. is requesting approval to further subdivide the Woolbright Place PUD. The PUD is located on S. W. 8th Street, approximately 1,300 feet north of Woolbright Road. The subdivison requested was to split up a 33.87 acre parcel from Tract C of the Woolbright Place Plat. It is proposed to subdivide Tract C into three parcels 2. Project Name: Owner: Agent: Description: - 14 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY C~~~SION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA AUGUST 16. 1994 (a 33.87 acre piece, a 14 acre piece, and a .94 acre piece). The regulations set forth conditions that have to be met in order not recordation of a plat. The criterion applicable to this proposal land is not to be divided into more than three contiguous lots. Commissioner Aguila asked if four parcels would be created if the owner goes bankrupt and someone buys the remainder of the property. (He was referring to Phase 1, the right portion from the phase line.) Ms. Heyden said this issue requires coordination between the Planning and Zoning Department and the Engineering Department. However, her recommendation would be that it would require replatting at that time. ' subdivision to requ i re is that the Ms. Heyden stated that in addition to the fact that only three parcels are being created, there is no need for any additional rights-of-ways or easements. Therefore, in conjunction with the Engineering Department, staff recommends' approval of this request as submitted. . Motion .. .. ~~~.. Commissioner Aguila moved to approve staff's recommendation. Commissioner Katz seconded the motion. Mr. Wolfarth asked for clarification. He referred to the parcel line and stated that the 14 acre parcel in the bottom left corner more than likely will be resubdivided. With the resubdivision of that property, which will require a replatting, there is the potential that it will be back in front of this Commission in about 30 days with a site plan and a PUD plan for review and con- sideration. There is a potential that it may be under two separate entities. In reading the staff report, he was of the impression that he has acknowledged that part of the 14 acre parcel will be replatted and will no longer be part of this plat, and that there would still be three parcels (Parcels 2A, 2B, and 3) after the 14 acres are resubdivided. He was of the impression that would allow the applicant to do it either way so that he does not have to come back again. In Ms. Heyden's opinion, if there are separate entities, it is two separate pieces of property and would require replatting independent of this.issue. However, that would be subject to another exception to platting and would have to come before the City Commission. It seemed to Mayor Hanmening that the more we have exceptions to platting, the more problems we allow to be created in the future. He pointed out that it has happened several times. Mr. Wolfarth was willing to sit down with staff again to resolve these matters. He stated that if he needs to come back to the Commission for reclarification or a readdressing, he will do so in the future when the parcel lines are further defined, if that happens. Commissioner Aguila said he needs to define his intent, discuss it with staff, get an interpretation from the City Attorney if necessary, and if need be, come back to the City Commission. - 15 - AUGUST 16, 1994 Vote on Motion The motion carried 5-0. - C. Other 1. Master ..~JU MOdification !ot Woolbright Place ~ f~ p ,1"",,()J Ms. Heyden stated tha.t this re t i // this case, Mr. Wolfarth is req~~:~inli~avery similar ,to the previ~~~e. In master plan for~fle Woolbright PlagepU~~ro~~~ ~~"~ifii the pre~u;~y approved Th7 approved master plan shows twct'multifamily n~~ (cad o~s ar~as fOllows: un,ts. Rather'than two pods tt).{ t r:" po s aI1Jf2), each 320 ~~~~~~~. ..~2~~2~,~oi~t! ~ll 'tp~e: ~~\~~s~l~~h~~: ~~~~: ~~" (~~ ~..~~~1-~~O --- Ie MINUTES - REGULAR CITY C~ISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA AUGUST 16. 1994 Vote on Mot10n The motion carried 5-0. - C. Other 1. Master PlIft MOdif1cation fof~Woolbright Place -/' i'/'/ Ms. Heyden stated that this request i~/very similar to the previ~~~e. In th j s case. Mr. Wo ~rarth 15 requestl ns" approva 1 to '!)Illll fy the pre~u~'~y approved master plan for~he Woolbright Plac;.e PUD. The mC?11fications are/as follows: The approved master plan shows tw,ci'multifamlly ~ds (pods 1 al1f"2), each 320 units. Rather than two pods, t~,1s master planp;'shows three P,gd's (A, Band)., (90 units)). At'this point, all tpree of these Qdds are being1hown as mult1:family. However, t~e app 11 can t i ntend,( to fl1 e anot)r1!r master mOdjJ'1 ca t Ion 1 n ;ife ~ery near future to convert this (to single fami,,Jy (Pod 1)../ /, _ If t~' ~' In addftion to the redistlibution of th"tunits and th,Jphasing p1a, , there is..zP __ slight' shifting of the ~cess points. /"They do meet I~he subd1vis n regulations'.'~ The~efore, they are ac~eptable. , ' ,7 ,/ I' /./, , ~o, as part of th 1 ~/ reques t, the~ 1 s the creayf on of a twe 'ty foot wi de ,.' andscape buffer be~een Pod 28 and Pod 1. l ..' part of this mas 'er modi fi catijpn. This wou' establi sh ~ forty foot setback from the proper,y 1i ne betwee,ll Pod 1 and P' 28.:l /,i ' ,! ".,' .' :i,;, ,< f ;,; Changes in ma.iter plans corJJ4 before the City ConmissiQ/l for determination 0, h sUbstantial7hange. If th,1 Conmission I{lcorrmends th~~ it is not a substary, al change, it JS forwarded ~o the P1anninw!and Develo~nt Board for final sposi- tion. .Ii ,.i ,.f .l / I ,f,; The redi ~)tri buti on of the pods and ~!1e acreage dO,s not increase the density.? Therefore, there is no 1n,trease in tra~'ic or water and se' r impacts. The ac~ftss points, as,ment1oned eat11er, are acc;.iptable, as well a~/ he phasing P 1 an '! .' I h . //::/ ,/j Ther,/are no mln1m\lll1 setbacks 1..fl/PUDS. Howev...~~, since this PUD. ~st resembles thY-3 zon1ng dl,s,tr1ct, staff/lndS the forillY foot setback ac;, table. Staff is concerned about thefbrty foot wi d,~ landscape bUffe~1 The buffer 1 s proposed to be.JPl1t between [two pods. St,ff recorrmends tha.~ twenty-five feet be approved consistent with pther PUDs infthe City, and that the twentY-five feet be totall;y within the ,doundaries of i'th1s property. T~e reasons for this are: (1) It ItS very hard to insure thatjlandscape buffer1 are retained as or1- 1nal1y required; (2) The yremise behind,fequiring a bUff,r is that the use that is creating the impact 1~ithe one thatfllas to mitigate; ,and (3) By splitting the buffer, there is no guap!nty that you,ould have a uni~ed design, construction, or timing and maintenance of that b~~1,er. Therefore, ,~taff recorrmends that the twenty- f j ve foo t buffer be wi th 1 n P/2B and POd 2C, / , - 16 - J 1't f~ 1> , 1-~()J ----