REVIEW COMMENTS
DEVELvPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 97-392
FROM:
Kerry Willis
City Manager
Tambri J. HeYden7[j.4
Planning and Zoning Director
TO:
DATE:
July 22, 1997
SUBJECT:
Response to July 18, 1997 correspondences from Jim Cherof and Brian Joslyn
Please be advised of the following with respect to the July 18, 1997 letter to Mr. Cheraf from Mr. Joslyn, attorney for
Michael Morton:
1. Item 3 , paragraph 1 - The attached sketch made part of the referenced November 1995 agreement specifies the
location of a hedge (on the north side of Morton's Way), but does not address the location of the code required
buffer wall. Police, Utilities, Planning and Zoning, and the Forester (all IRC concerned about the buffer wall)
recommend that the buffer wall be located along the south side of Morton's Way. Therefore, there is no conflict
among staff with the respect to the wall location and no need for a subsequent meeting with Mr. Morton
regarding this issue.
2. Item 3, paragraph 2 - Regarding the referenced freestanding sign, please see the attached Planning and Zoning
Memorandum No. 97-369 from myself to Mr. Cherof. Staff did not eliminate this sign, the City Commission
denied Mr. Morton's request for an additional sign in 1990. Since Mr. Morton has never finished the master plan
rectification process since 1990, the denied sign is still showing the plans. Mr. Morton's concern over this denial
came up again when he revised his sign program in 1996. The City Commission did not change their 1990
decision. Mr. Morton is refusing to accept this and remove it from the plans. The last settlement agreement
requires that Morton' s Way be constructed by September 7, 1997. Staff comments indicate this should be
completed on time, although Mr. Morton has not yet applied for a permit. Furthermore, he has not requested a
revision to the agreement. This is the extent of the rectified master plan issues. However, if you feel the need for
a meeting with Mr. Morton regarding these issues, please let me know the meeting date and I will be more than
happy to attend.
3. Item 3, paragraph 3 - The development order for the referenced master sign program was mailed to Mr.
Morton's agent, Anna Cottrell, on December 9, 1996 as is the city's policy (see attached transmittal letter).
4. Item 3, paragraph 4 - Second review comments were faxed to Mike Morton on 7/21/97 from all TRC members,
with the exception of the fire department. The fire department's comments were not received until today and
were faxed to Mr. Morton today (see attached fax verifications).
TJH:dim
Attachments
Cc: Jim Cherof
Al Newbold
TRC Representatives
Mike Haag Jerzy Lewick Sebastian Puda
Bill Cavanaugh Sgt. Marlon Haris Skip Milor
Mark Lips John Wildner Kevin Hallahan
\\CH\MAIN\SHRDA T A \Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\SHPSWOOL \request memo,doc
.
ITEM 3, PARAGRAPH 1
ATTACHMENTS
. t
/1J ' I' !JI/:
RESOLUTION NO. RS ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND
CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT
BE'IWEEN THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH AND
HOWARD SCHARLIN, TRUSTEE FOR WOOLBRIGHT
PLACE, JOINT VENTURE; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Tradewinds Development Corporation and the City
of Boynton Beach have heretofore been engaged in lengthy
litigation over the development of property located in Boynton
Beach, Florida, which litigation is subject to stipulations
and judgments entered in Palm Beach County Circuit Court, Case
Nos. CL 86-3661 and CL 87-1638 AE; and
WHEREAS, Howard Scharlin, Trustee for Woolbright Place,
Joint Venture, is the successor in interest to the rights of
:! Tradewinds and is the sole owner of the property which was the
I subject of the above referenced litigation; and
WHEREAS, the parties desire to enter into an Agreement,
I which shall supersede all previous agreements, stipulations
,: and judgments concerning the rights of the parties as it
I relates to the development of the subject property;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF
I THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT~
I Section 1. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby
i authorized and directed to execute an Agreement between the
City of Boynton Beach and Howard Scharlin, Trustee for
: Woolbright Place, Joint Venture, which Agreement is attached
:: hereto as Exhibit "A".
':
'I
:: Section 2. That this Resolution
:! effective immediately upon passage.
shall
become
,
,I
PASSED AND ADOPTED this /~
day of ~#V , 1995.
!
;1
I:
'I
~ I
II
'I
I
"
"
:1
,:
I
;i
I
II
II
i!
I
I
I
il ATTEST:
,
::~~9~~<U-.
I Ci Y Clerk
I
(Corporate Seal)
Autheig.doQ
~r.d'~lftd','lft.1Agr
./12195
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT is entered into between THE CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH ("CITY"), and HOWARD SCHARLIN, TRUSTEE for WOOLBRIGHT
PLACE
JOINT
t':,.
'. /." Y6/-z.
to" ,- c
VENTURE
("SCHARLINIl) ,
this
/?
day
of
//
/G '
, 1995.
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, TRADEWINDS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, acting for the
Woolbright Place Joint Venture ("Woolbrightll) and the CITY have
heretofore been engaged in lengthy litigation over the development
of property located in Boynton Beach, Florida, which litigation is
subject to stipulations and judgments entered in Palm Beach County
circuit Court, Case No. CL 86-3661 AE and CL 87-1638 AE; and
WHEREAS, Howard Schar1in, Trustee for Woolbright Place, Joint
venture, is the true party in interest to the rights of TRADEWINDS
and is the sole owner of the property which was-, the subj ect of the
above referenced litigation; and
WHEREAS, Scharlin desires to enter into an Agreement with the
. .
CITY which shall confirm the good standing of the parties under the
stipulations and judgements entered in the above referenced
litigation, and;
WHEREAS, the parties have engaged in negotiations which are
intended to resolve 'all current and future development issues with
respect to the real property identified in the above referenced
litigation, inclUding issues involving the interpretation of ,the
previous stipulations entered into between the parties and the
Court Orders implementing same; and
Final 5/16/95
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed upon the terms that will
bring the litigation between them to a final conclusion in a manner
which is equally beneficial to all interested parties, and to the
citizens of the CITY; and
WHEREAS, SCHARLIN has represented to the CITY that Scharlin
is the only party who holds legal title to the property which is
the subject of this litigation and represents all those with
equitable interests therein, or who has standing to enforce the
stipulations and Orders entered into in the above referenced
litigation.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants
expressed and exchanged herein the parties agree as follows:
1. The foregoing whereas clauses are true and correct.
2. All references to SCHARLIN herein shall mean Howard
Scharl!n, Trustee as authorized representative of owners of 100% of
beneficial interest in Woolbright, his successors or assigns.
3. INDUSTRIAL ACCESS ROAD: SCHARLIN shall construct the
industrial access road centered within a 50' public right-of-way
along the northern boundary of the PCD within twenty-one (21)
months of the date of this agreement including, but not limited to,
curbs and drainage. In return, the CITY agrees to abandon or
convey to SCHARLIN the southernmost 30' of the industrial road
right-at-way. The road shall be built in accordance with applicable
design standards and with the typical cross section depicted on
attached Exhibit'IIA". The design shall incorporate ~ west bound
left turn lane on the industrial access road onto S.W. 8th street,
a sidewalk along the north side of the road from S.W. 8th street to
Final 5/16/95
the eastern terminus of the road, with curbs and gutters along both
sides, and a continuous ficus hedge along the property line which
separates the PCD from the Vinings Development. "SCHARLIN shall
provide surety for the roadway improvements in the man~er
prescribed by the CITY's Land Development Cod~. The CrTY agrees
that SCHARLIN may have no more than three (3) points of ingress and
egress to the PCD from the industrial access road, provided the
access points are located following the customary approval process
for the location of drive~ays.
4 .
LANDSCAPE BERM.
In addition to other berms or walls
which are required to be constructed in the PCD or PUD, SCHARLIN
shall construct irrigated landscape berm along the west boundary of
the PCD and PUD, less the church parcel, within three months of
the execution of this Agreement. The berm height shall be measured
from the elevation on the Leisureville side of the berm and may
~
consist of five (5) feet of earthen berm and a ficus hedge. The
berm shall be landscaped along its high point with a continuous
ficus hedge planted and maintained in accordance with the memo
dated May II, 1995, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit
"C".
5.
VESTING:
The CITY agrees that any and all CITY and
County impact fees which are required to be paid for the PUD and
PCD shall be calculated at the fee rate in effect in November, 1986
and the CITY shall collect such 1986 impact fee 'from the applicant
as development orders are issued and as a condition precedent to
the issuance of any building permits. SCHARLIN shall pay all other
building and permitting fees in effect at the time of applic~ion.
Final 5/16/95
To the extent that a category of impact fee did not exist in 1986
and was thereafter implemented by the CITY and/or County SCHARLIN
shall not be required to pay such fees. The CITY is not a party
to any agreement between SCHARLIN and Palm Beach County regarding
County impact fees. The CITY shall remit to the County any impact
fees paid by SCHARLIN to the CITY for County impact fees but the
CITY shall have no additional liability to SCHARLIN or the county
if the County demands additional fees, and SCHARLIN shall hold CITY
harmless from any such liability.
6.
USES IN THE PCD:
The parties agree that all uses
permitted under current PCD or C-J zoning regulations are
permissible in the boundaries of the current PCD, subj ect to
conditional use approv~l by the City commission when so designated
in the city Code'. By way of example: fast food restaurants are a '
permitted use, restaurants with drive thru are a conditional use~
requiring Commission approval.
7. FORCED AIR BURNING: The CITY agrees to permit one (1)
controlled air/forced air burning on the site, from the date of
this agreement, subject to Fire Department approval and proper
atmospheric conditiQns.
8. GARDEN CENTER/ACCESSORY USE: The CITY acknowle~ges that
the Home Depot Outdoor Garden Center is an accessory use and that
said Garden Center shall not be included as part of the retail
gross leasable area.
9. REVIEW PROCEDURE: The CITY and SCHARLIN agree that the
development review procedure attached hereto as Exhibit "B" shall
be implemented and applied to all applications by SCHARLIN for
Final 5/16/95
further construction permitting on the property. The CITY further
agrees that upon receipt of applications as required by applicable
ordinances, it shall process maste~ plan modifications and site
plans in accordance with the schedule attached as Exhibit "B".
10. SCHARLIN shall be required to bond all required
subdivision improvements including on and off-site improvements
required by CITX Code.
11. MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION: Nothing herein shall prevent
SCHARLIN from seeking modification of the current master plan.
Notwithstanding any previous requirement, additional commercial
buildings need not be attached to the Home Depot Garden Center.
Master Plan modifications shall be conducted in accordance with the
procedures in place at time of application for same.
12. PHASE DEVELOPMENT: The CITY agrees that SCHARLIN shall
have the right to phase development of the PCD and/or the PUD as
..,
well as sever portions of the property from the PUD or PCD,
provided, however, that the phasing of any improvements whi~h are
required by the subdivision and platting regulations shall be in
accordance with the revised master plans submitted by SCHARLIN and
approved by the CITY, and phasing of said improveman~a is
reasonably related to the land uses that are proposed in the
particular phase.
13. ADDITIONAL CURB CUTS:
Notwithstanding any prior
agreement, SCHARLIN may request additional curb cuts along S.W. 8th
street. Approval shall be subject to customary review and hearing
for traffic flow and safety considerations.
14.
RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT:
Upon execution of this
Final 5/16/95
Agreement by both parties and approval by Court order all prior
stipulations, agreements, letters of understanding, negotiations
shall be deemed in good standing and satisfied and the future
rights of the parties shall be governed by this Agreement and the
applicable provisions of the CITY Code of ordinances, as that Code
is amended from time to time. SCHARLIN shall provide to the CITY
A. /'''-; f'
a General Release from SCHARLIN, '~,;i~~'~~::!~7 M:-;' ~j}..--:"l4'
WOOLBRIGHT PLACE, JOINT VENTURE, and MICHAEL MORTON
.
(/?t I r
releasing the CITY from all claims or actions accrued or
outstanding which either has or may assert against the CITY, except
those claims or actions which may accrue in the future based upon
either party I s failure to comply with any provision of this
Agreement.
15. COMMISSION/COURT APPROVAL: This Agreement shall have no
force and effect until approved by a majority of the CITY
Commission and the entry of an Order approving a Stipulation for
Settlement and Dismissal referencing the terms of this Agreement.
16. ATTORNEY FEES:
SCHARLIN shall pay to the CITY Five
Thousand ($5,000.00) Dollars, representing attorney fees and costs
incurred by the CITY in this action.
17. CODE COMPLIANCE: The parties agree that unless herein
stipulated, all current and future activities will be governed by
city Codes and Regulations in force and effect upon the date of
application tor an activity.
18 . REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS:
SCHARLIN agrees to complete
construction of all required improvements including, but not
limited to, the industrial access road referenced in paragraph 3
Final 5/16/95
above, and previously required landscaping.
SCHARLIN further
agrees to provide 110% surety for all required improvements and to
complete the required improvement within twenty-one (21) months of
tpe date of the CIT~ Comm!ssion accep,tanqe o~this ~greement.
19. RIGHT-OF-WAY LICENSING AGREEl-rENT: The parties agree that
the Grant of License by the CITY to SCHARLIN as recorded with Palm
Beach County on December 11, 1990 (90-352210, Official Record Book
6667, Page 103) remains in full force and effect. The parties agree
to correct an error in the legal description contained therein.
20. ENFORCEABILITY: Nothing herein shall constitute a waiver
on the part of either party to seek judicial enforcement of the
terms of this Agreement. This Agreement shall be binding on all
successors or assigns of SCHARLIN.
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
by:
ATTEST:
(CITY Seal)
- 1.9,-
JAC/lms
900304
AGREE. 1
H' rd Scharl!n, Trustee
of ~OOl right Place Joint
ven~ "
/ r;9 t:.:'(/~' .::e/~ I ,J:.. t:L\--/.C
~'/ ./l( -L;~/'~ ~ ; ( lei ~f;.
/
Final 5/16/95
, \
....
?t
\-
-
\\)
=t
:t
z
-
\J\
u
....
...
-
.~
\)
~
.~
%:
-<t
-
-<:)
l.C")
Mia
:l
,
sl
~a!
~~~
aL~
~ '
::~
~-J:
. ~~
~~
"i'
-
. I l
; Ut \(t
ii\l'~: i\i\~ i
)j ";1-" , ,\ I\. II.
3 i. \0 '-'
~ 3-: ~~"'~
. \,). \;;.
: ~, '"
. Q tl
': \I. S~
~ ~. ~~
:-. ~ ~~9
1:: l' i~ ~
~, \I\~ ()
~"-\lI~ ~
.~ ~QV\~
1= \J, ....
-- ~t c.a
.' t-a (f): -
.-
i I
\ I; \
~ II \ I
~ ,\ I
I
o
i
"
. ,.
~, ~
~
\J
-
...
~
''f
~
"
~
~
t
')- ~ ~
cL \1\" ~
3 \ ~
..~ + \lJ
,.c:;. ~ '2
~ ~ ~,
Ci ....,~
o ~ .(.
J:: ( Cl:
'" :2 ;) \
- t-t
Q ~ ~~
lU 'Jc
V) s "i -:
C> ~~ ~ \
P- flJ' ~ (
o t~ 1L
~ II
0:. Q~ t
:)1" .
~ S~~:
& Z1n
:t ~~~
~ ~~~
,.. 51 ')
""U () ~ ()
~ ~~~
~
..
-
EXHIBIT B
The following procedure shall be implemented and followed by
both SCHARLIN and the CITY in the filing and processing of all
requests for development approval:
step 1. SCHARLIN contacts the Planning Director to Schedule
a pre-application meeting.
Step 2.. Written documentation outlining request should be
submitted to the Planning Director no less than five (5) business
days prior to pre-application meeting. This will permit the
Planning Director to make appropriate inquiries of other staff
members.
Step J. Pre-application meeting with staff. Staff will
provide comments at this meeting.
step 4. Formal submission of application by Tradewinds.
step 5. Staff will review application within ten (10)
business days.
step 6. . Planning Director will provide written response on
or before tenth (lOth) business day following submission.
step 7. Application will be placed on the P&D .agenda for
next P&D meeting, it P&D meeting will occur within two (2) weeks.
If P&D meeting is not within two (2) weeks, a special P&D meeting
will be called. Developer may, at its discretion, request delay ot
the Planning and Development Board meeting but such request must be
in writing.
step 8. FOllowing P&D action, application placed on next
City commission agenda.
Final 5/16/95
.
In the event that public notice is required by city ordinance
or state law tor public hearing, then in that event, the scheduling
of meetings under step 7 and step 8 shall be extended to meet the
notice requirements of law.
Final 5/16/95
. '.....nc; '''U/I/~
IlijSUU::~Jj... COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC.
1C07 OCeAN DRIY! I eOYHTON lEACH. 'LOAlDA >>Ctl
m MMI2M ~
MEMO
ENGI EERfNG_
;
To:
Fronn
Subject:
Date:
CAJUUE PARKER., CITY MANAGER.
PETER. J. KELLY, PRESIDENT. PALM SEACH LElSUREVIUE
MEETING REOARDJNG BERM ETC. 8TH AVE
May 11. 1995
Today, r met with Mr. Houliban. Mr. HaJJ and Mike Monon.Tbls mudn, wu called
10aether by Mr. Kert HaU.
After discussion, the forlowina was .areed upon pendin.approvaJ 9'tho City Mlnapr.
1. Berm to b. minimum oC 5 tcot blah with . 3 pl. Hod,. planted on top. ThI. berm
it 10 bo lapered and hedS' planted to point oflntorsoctJon orold at new rOld.
2. Hedse to be continued ltom thac point to the utlU&y box on Welt ltd. orlth Ave. and
will be a '811 heds"
J. Jrrigatlon win bo COMected Into PB lAl.ure\lill. mSldon system.
4.Mr. Morton will do the berm p1antinl and bedpnllftd aD COMectiOns to Uris.tion system.
5. H. will b. respolW"bl. tor maJntainln. the entire berm and be respcnJlbI. tor the itrfption.
, .
.
6. PB Lei.umW. wiD maintain the hedS' ft'om the polDt orlnt.r.ectloa 10 tho one! orthe hedS-.
W. will also inipt. th.lr..
A11lh. above COftdIdoDl .... ...._ upon only Ittbcy .1* with the condltloftl .ee forth
by M.: Curio Parker, City Manalcr.
Thant you.
co.
P/lOIW' WJ 1 .,.""'1'7 - f# t.
...
. .
Po8t.ft'"FpNotl
,. (J
CoJOepL
1111 0..
,... <<I
It U
-----e'-.( C
TIll II1T.....r PRlPAIlID IY
.. RETUlII TO:
JAMiI A. CHEJIOf, 11GU11t1
JO$IAS & GORP, , .A.
3099 Ease c....-cl.l IGuleY.rd
Sui c. 200
Fort Lauderdale. Il 33308
O)JEUI: ~ELBA8B
KNOW ALL HEN BY 'l'HESE l?EmS~NTS; That WOOLBRIGHT PLACE JOINT
VENTV~E, first party, ~or ~nd in consideration o~ the sum of Ten
and NO/lOO ($10.00) DOLLARS, or other valuable considerations,
received from or on behalf of THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, second
party, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged.
(Wherever used herein the terms "first party" and "second
party"
aball
include singular and plural,
heirs,
legal
representatives, and assigns or individuals, and the successors and
assigns ot corporations, WhArever tbe context so admits or
requires).
HBREBY remiae, releas.. , acquit ,_,satisfy '. r1fore~e~L ~i.ctlarQ'. _
l.O i~ 'tWo Q,.~c ..... -r~'" ~\lrt'." ,. ^..,.., ...e:f~~ HfJ"'.z.......J illl
Ifbol.U,4f"lfl'- a:t1 ~ \,I.,~ 1 .cd 11-1- 4, 41
the said second party, of and ~om al~, an all mannar ot action ~
and actions, cause and causes or action, suit., debt., dues, suma
of money, accounts, reckonings, bonds, bills, specialtia.,
covananta,
.,
contracts,
ccntroversl..,
agreement.,
promises,
variance., trespassec, dama9GB, judgments, executiona, claims and
demands whatsoaver, in law ~r in aqui~y, which said ~irst party
aver had, now ha'S, or which any personal. representatives,
successor, heir or ...iqn of said first party, hereafter can, shall
or may have, aqainst said secona party, tor, upon or by reason o~
.~. ~ -.
f
any matter, cause or thing vhat'aoever, ~rom the beginning of the
world to the day ot these pr,eseutu.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF I 1 have ~lereunto set my hand and seal this
~ day ot )M,o/nJ,~f
, 1995.
,
BY:,..'/
.
VENTURE
/L-
Signed, sealed and de~iv.red
in the presence of:
(~p.; j)~dL .
y'.. () ,L 0
NnlA ~an~nt"Z'.
Printed Name. C>> ~ ~
~.V~i";-
pr1nt~ Name ~'~_._..'''''.-
STATE OF FLORIDA )
)
COUNTY OF )
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, batore ma, an officar duly
authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgements,
personally appeared '#owarJ It:. .!'..J.arl/", the ~.J~ ot
WOOLBRIGHT PLACZ JOINT VENTURE, known to me to be the person
described. in and who exec";,lted the foreqo1ng instrument, who
acknowledge before JIG that he .axecuted the same, i. personally
known to me and an 04 th wa. llot taken. -
.. ..... ... .. ... .'
Witne8. my band and 9tricial seal in the county and State last
atoresaid this 2f/.. ',' ~ay ot '~AJ,y~~~ , 19..tL::.
~ ):;:,/114.. ~,,"d /
NOTARY PUBLXC "(
Printed Name
My Cammi..ion Expires:
, .
J....,'...~
_04"
WOOL'IT.IIL
. . .
~. ..
KINIA IANOIIZ
NOrMY ftJIUC II'Aft OF JIL,OIIDA
COMMI!iIION NO. CC311140
MYCOMMISSIONEXP. L't .,,,
THIS II/STILIEJIT PlUMIO "
& RlTUlJI TO:
JAMES A. tRIM, ISQUII.
JOSIAI & GDREM, ',A.
3099 Ease Camerc:t.l IcIuteverd
Suit. 200
Fore Lauderdale. 'L 33308
GBHBRAL RBLBASB
XNOW ALL MEN BY THESE l'RESENTS: That HOWARD SCHARLIN, first
party. tor and in conside,'t'ation of the sum of Tan and NO/lOa
($10.00) DOLLARS, or other valuable considerations, received from
or on behalf of THE CITY OF BOY~TON BEACH, second party, receipt
whereat is hereby acknowledged.
(Wherever used herein the terms "first party" and "second
party"
shall
include sinqular and plural,
heirs,
legal
representative., and assigns of individuals, and the succa..ors and
assigns of corporations, wherever the context so adaits or
requires).
HEREBY remise, r.lflle~s~, aCCJlO:it, satisfy, and toravar discharga I
Iw'~~ e,..OAfW-1-~P"II.tt~~""'S4!ofJ'~ ~/"~ bc~c
5eJw.r1t... -,ill e.:~ -t':1.'CA'M- ,. ~ n...,.,,,'.
the said aecond party ot and t:-om a1 , and a 1 manner of action
and actions, cauae and causes of action, suits, debts, due., sums
ot money, accounts, reckoning8, bond., bill., specialties,
covanan't.,
contracts,
controversies,
agreamen'ta,
promiae.,
variances, tr..~as.a3, damAq.., judgments, executions, claims and
demands whatsoever, .La law or in aqui1:y, which said tirst party
ever had, now ha., or which any paraona1 r.pre.en~ativ..,
successor, heir O~ a_Rign 0:: ~ai~ .t.'irst party, haraafter can, sba11
or may have,. against said second party, tor, upon or by reason or
-.
any ma~tar, caus. or' thing what3oever, trom the beginning ot the
world to the day of these p%'esenta.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this
,
g#- day ot ;Vf/Vt~~ ,. 2995.
signed, ..aled and delivered
in the presence of:
uf/u~ k~~
)<P//!a. .fQn~~L'l: I _
Printed Name ~
~0lJ~
EVA~e{ 'lIP- e. VI ~n"1....
Printe Name .
. \
~/
-~l
.' HOWARD SCHAR
/71
BY:
STAT! OF FIDRIDA )
)
COUNTY OF .)
I HERBBY CERTIFY tbat on this day, before me, an otticer duly
authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgements,
personally appeared HOWARD SCHARLI:N as Q~
, known to me 'to be the person
descri1:uad in .,.d Who executed the toregoing instrument, who
acknowledge before .. that he executed the same, ia p.r~onal1y
known to m. and an oath was not: taken.
Wi tn... my hand and otf'iclal seal in the County and State last
aforesaid this g~ day of AJI11I~~"~r , 19.fC.
. (~/JLkea.4d/
NOTARY PUBLIC 0
Printed Nama
My Co_i.8ion Bxpire.:
.IAC/&_
9DCD04
SCHAIL.III.IEL
ICINIA SANCHEZ
NOI'A&Y PUIUC irATE OF R..ORIDA
OOMMIS&ION NO. CC3h140 ;
MYCOMM15ISION DP. ULY 4.1", I
ITEM 3, PARAGRAPH 2
ATTACHMENTS
. t
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTh1ENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 97-369
FROM:
Jim Cherof
City Attorney . '
. --=- I . (t/ltr-I..., U.f-
Tambn J. Heyden, AICP /,(1)..,k'''~'i'l'-''"d :1c;1
Planning and Zoning Director
TO:
DATE:
July IS, 1997
SUBJECT:
Mr. Morton's master plan modification for Shoppes of Woolbright peD
At Monday (7/14/97) night's meeting with Mr. Morton, Mr. Morton made numerous references
to the above application which is in progress and scheduled to go before the Planning and
Development Board August 12, 1997. The modified master plan is necessary as a prerequisite to
subdividing the land within the PCD to create the separate parcels Mr. Morton desires for
Discount Auto and Food Court. However, even if these uses don't materialize, and Mr. Morton
withdraws the application, he still needs to complete the process of rectifying the PCD master
plan. Such a master plan, that addresses all master plan modification comments approved by the
Commission in connection with the five different master plan modification applications
processed since 1990, has never been received. Mr. Morton's last attempt at such a plan was not
received until 2 Y2 weeks ago (6/24/97). It was Mr. Morton's choice to combine the rectification
process master plan with the master plan to subdivide the parcels (and change their access); the
latter being the master plan needing Board and Commission approval and needed to release a
Discount Auto certificate of occupancy (see bullet five of Vanessa Llera's attached memorandum
distributed by Mr. Morton at Monday's meeting).
I doubt Discount Auto has pulled out as Mr. Morton claims, since Mr. Morton has not returned
their refundable deposit. Be that as it may, Mr. Morton is asking for the items in Vanessa's
memorandum to be disconnected from Discount Auto's certificate of occupancy. He further
claims that the master plan modification is not needed since Discount Auto has pulled out.
However, based on the above concerns, relief from the master plan modification must not also
relieve Mr. Morton from rectifying the master plan. This is consistent with the City Manager's
statement at the meeting that the city should not allow Mr. Morton to keep putting off
obligations.
You need to be aware that Mr. Morton is close to achieving a rectified master plan, but there is
one issue to which Mr. Morton refuses to agree, and which is holding up the process. This is the
)
Page 2 of2
Memorandum No. 97-369
issue with the number of allowed freestanding signs on Woolbright Road. Herewith I am
reforwarding to you the documents which staff believes verify that Mr. Morton's request for two
freestanding signs was not approved. Despite this he refuses to remove the extra sign from his
master plan. Please advise as to whether you disagree with this conclusion.
Lastly, you might be interested in knowing that although Mr. Morton stated that Planning and
Zoning staff was refusing to process his master plan, the application came in on 4/18/97. It was
incomplete. However, in order to work with Mr. Morton, staff started processing it as a first
review plan. Mr. Morton missed the revised submittal deadline and did not resubmit until late on
6/24/97, The resubmittal was distributed by memorandwn to the Technical Review Committee
within the timeframe allotted by code. Comments were due back yesterday, also within the
time frame set forth by code.
TJH:dim
Attachment
Xc: Kerry Willis, City Manager
Al Newbold, Acting Development Services Director
Mike Haag, Building Code Permit Administrator
Jerzy Lewicki, Acting Senior Planner
Vanessa Llera, Plans Review Technician
J:\SHRDA T A \Planning\SHARED\WP\CORRESP\CITY A TIY\Morton's MPMD Shoppes of Woolbright.doc
.,-)
t
DEVF~ OPMENT SERVICES DEPAl MENT
PL.ANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 97-176 (Amended)
TO:
Mike Haag
Building Code Permit Administrator
FROM:
Vanessa Uera
Planning and Zoning Department
DATE:
July 1,1997
RE:
Shoppes of Woolbright - Discount Auto (permit # 96-5843)
The following is a revised list of the requirements that must be met by Discount Auto
prior to receiving a certificate of occupancy as stated by City Commission on 3/4/97, file
no. NWSP 96-013:
. City Commission has approved plat for Tract "C" of Shoppes of Woolbright.
Plat has not been recorded, Development Order of the City Commission dated
March 4, 1997, comment # 15.
. Installation of remaining landscaping at west buffer of Woolbright Place PUD ( old
8th Street right-of-way between north property line of church parcel and Ocean
Avenue) and lake perimeter planting and littoral planting for the Water Management
area, are currently in the inspection phase. Development Order of the City
Commission dated March 4, 1997, comment # 33.
. A copy of cross easement agreements for northern and southern driveways has
been submitted, but not the recorded copy. Development Order of the City
Commission dated March 4,1997, comment # 16.
. Current Master Plan is in the submittal process, has not been presented to P/D
Board. Development Order of the City Commission dated March 4. 1997. comment
# 34 & 36.
. Landscape for Discount Auto has not been submitted for permits. Development
Order of the City Commission dated March 4, 1997, comment # 21.
The Planning and Zoning Division will keep you informed when the above criterion has
been met.
VHL : vhl
xc: Steve Cooper
Jerzy Lewicki
Central File
')
S:\PLANNING\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\DISCAUTO\MEMO,DOC
.
\
}
'-II' or
./
BOYNTON BEACH
~
i4J
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P. 0, Box 310
Boynton Beach. florida 33435.0310
1407) 734.8111
OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR
August 27, 1990
Mr. Robert Gomez
902 Clint Moore Road, Suite 124
Boca Raton, Fl. 33487
S;; 1t."J .jJ(l.t>U.; r.t:/l"'\
RE: Shoppes of Woolbright - Site Plan Modification (Signs)
File No. 527
Dear Mr. Gomez:
")
Please be advised that on Tuesday, August 21, 1990, the Ci
Commission approved the referenced site plan modification (si~
program), subject to staff comments, copies of which aJ
attached, and including the landscape stipulations recommended k
the Community Appearance Board (see attached). With respect t
the sign variances requested, the City Commission approved onl
those variances allowing the Home Depot building signs a
presented and one freestandinq sign limited to 30 feet in height
150 square feet in size and the identification of the proJec
name Home Depot an wo enan s. Sa SJ. s ra
~ ocate alone] the Wnn1hright oad fronta~!.L with a mJ.nJ.mu
setback of 10 feet from any property line so as not to conflic
with required landscaping and easements.
These plans were approved subj ect to your compliance with th
attached stipulations and must now be modified to incorporat
same. To initiate your sign-off procedure, please submit two (2
sets of modified plans to the Office of the Site Developmen
Division of the Building Department, which will record th
required identification markings on each set of the modifie
plans.
After each set of modified plans has the appropriate markings
you should proceed with your sign-off on each set of plans fro:
each Technical Review Board member who made comments. The Zonin
& Site Development Administrator will provide the Buildin
Department sign-off and is the last Technical Review Board membe
TO: Mr. Robert Gomez
-2-
August 27, 1990
to review and sign-off the plans. If the Building Departmeni
not have comments that require sign-off, they are still the
department to handle and process the plans. One (1) set of t
signed-off plans will remain with the Building Department and
other set of plans will be returned to you to be retained at
job site.
To help facilitate the sign-off process, you should make
appointment to meet with each Technical Review Board member (,
those members who made comments), to allow them sufficient t
to review and sign-off the modified plans. After securing
the required Technical Review Board member signatures
completing processing by the Site Development Division, you
apply for building permits by submi tting the appropr i
documents and fee to the Plan Review and Permitting Division
the Building Department. The Building Department will advise:
as to any additional permits which may be required, such as Pc
Beach Health Department (water and sewer), clearing/grubbir
excavation/fill, drainage, paving, site lighting, landscaping a
irrigation.
The approval of the City entitles you to construct only t
improvements shown on the site plan. The site plan will :
viewed procedurally as an as-built or record drawing. If yt
have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitat
to contact me.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BO~EACH
1:: I"GOLDEN
Interim planning Director
JJG:frb
Encs
cc: Technical Review Board
C:ShofWl
,,)
I
I
I
I
\
.;K
MINUTES - R ~R CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
AUGUST 21, 1990
Mr. Chuck Capella, representative for the owner, noted his
company was not responsible for the banners. Once Mr.
Capella has the permi~he estimated the sign could prob~bly
be fabricated and installed in about three weeks. Scott
Blasie, Administrator of Code Enforcement stated the 30 day
clock on the violation had started about two weeks ago, so
they were looking at another two weeks. The restaurant
would be brought before the Code Enforcement Board during
the third week 1n September. '
Mr. Jaeger explained the Sign Code does allow temporary
signage once they submit for a permit. They could be issued
a temporary sign permit to allow the banners. The Mayor
thought businesses should be advised of that fact rather
than finding out from Code Enforcement. Mr. Jaeger indi-
cated they have told them that, however, they have to go
through the site plan approval process first before they
can ~ubmit for the permit. Once they submit for the permit,
they can submit for the temporary signage.
It was noted the Community Appearance Board and Planning &
Zoning Board had approved the sign. Johnnetta Broomfield,
Director of Community Improvement indicated the sign
complied with t~e downtown sign guidelines.
"
,
Vice Mayor Wische moved to approve tbe sign. Commissioner
Olenik seconded the motion for discusa~on purposes.
Cynthia Greenhouse, 618 N.E. 20th Lane, 'Boynton Beach stated
banner signs are presently prohibited. She made remarks
about the three draped banner signs and statad the
restaurant was requesting approval of a sign'~hen they were
in violation. Mrs. Greenhou~e thought the reitaurant had
"tl1umbed its noseU at the City'since being cited. and she
explained. "
\
\
\
\
I
I
i
\, I
Discussion took place regarding ba ner signs that some !
tenants at the Winn Dixie shopping enter had put up during;
recent renovation and the fact that ey had also been cited
by Code Enforcement. Mr. Blasie indio,ted all but one \'
tenant had removed the banners voluntar~ly. The remaini~g
case had been cited. .
Mayor Moore called for a vote on the motion. The motion i
carried 4-1. Commissioner Weiner voted against the motion..'
5. Project:
A.gent:
Owner:
Shoppes of Woolbright
Robert Gomez. Project Manager
Tradewinds Development Corp.
c/o Howard Scharlin
Woolbright Rd. at the L.W.D.D. E-4
Loca t ion:
)
11
t
dU......L c.~ - REf
BOYNTON BEAC
.AR CITY COMMISSION MEETldu
FLORIDA
AUGUST 21, 1990
Canal, northeast corner
SIGN VARIANCE AND SITE PLAN: Request
for approval of an amended site plan
to allow for .project signage .
Jim Golden explained the TRB recommended appro~al of this
re~uest with the exception of the sign variance request
WhICh had to be addressed by the Commission. When this
request went to the Planning & Zoning Board; the Board
recommended approval and at that time the developer offered
to move the 50' high free-standing sign from the southeast
corner of the building to the northeast and reduce the
height from SO' to 40'.
Description:
Vice Mayor Wische reported on the CAB's recommendations.
City Manager Miller stated there were two pylon signs, one
on the east and one on the west. Staff recommended the east
pylon sign, referred to as the "B" sign, (next to 1-95) be
eliminated. Mr. Miller stated it was recommended that sign
"A" be centrally located somewhere in that vicinity, but
kept within the height limitation of 30'. Relative to the
other two wall signs, it was recommended that the 720 sq.
ft. for the maximum wall signage be allowed and the 150 sq.
ft. of signage, with the owner given the discretion of
choosing the advertising matter.
~..------ --- -- ....._.~~-_..- '--. -::;.--
(/ Michael Morton, Tradewinds Group, Boca Raton stated they
) were eliminating the SO' pylon sign in its entirety. They
were going along with the recommendations of the CAB, TRB,
Planning & Zoning Board and Building Dept. and were
requesting the rest of the sign variance be approved. He
noted everything else they had presented was approved. with
the exception of three items.
Mr. Miller indicated a 30' pylon sign remained which would
need a variance in connection with the square footage which
would be 150 sq. ft. In this district, 80 sq. ft. is the
maximum.
In connection with the Home Depot wall signs on the front
and side of the store, a variance was needed to set the
maximum sq. ft. at 720 sq. ft. The Ordinance allows 64 sq.
ft. Mr. Jaeger noted this is in a PCD and the Ordinance
doesn't really address what happens when you have a building
of this magnitude. All it allows per tenant is 64 sq. ft.
He thought it was really meant to address strip shopping
centers, however, in a normal commercial zone they would be
allowed 10% of the face of the building which would be 1,300
sq. ft.
A variance request was also needed in connection with the
multi-use on the remaining free-standing sign. Staff recom-
':_) mended approval of this aspect.
12
M1NUTES - RE AR CITY COMMISSION MEETIN~
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
AUGUST 21, 1990
In co~nection with the remainlng pylon sign, Mr. Morton
explalned the 150 sq. ft. would consist of 72 sq. ft. for
the Home Depot portion, 38 sq. ft. for the Shoppes of
Woolbright portion and 30 additional sq. ft. for two addi-
tional tenants to go on in the future~ Mr. Morton calcu-
lated even with the two additional tenants listed, there
would Bti~l be 9'6" of clearance from the bottom of the sign
to the ground. Discussion took place regarding the ren-
dering which was before the Commission and Commissioner
Olenik noted the rendering didn't reflect what Mr. Morton
was proposing. Mr. Morton indicated that the rendering was
not up-to-the-minute as some of the decisions were made
after the ~~ meeting which was held the prior evening.
\. ..- M-r ~-"Mo-r-ton--r-e!fPonaecrth'e-. 'sTgn cont i-gurat ion- to--be" used' wou Id
be a compromise between the 50' sign and the 30' sign. You
would have The Home Depot, Shoppes of Woolbright and space
for additional tenants below it. Thg~~~ld be one sign
ins~;.~~--2; ~o S,~!Hh", ~ehgtny discussion ensii"ea:---r-t-was--
'-'-clarlfied tnat the wall sign on the west and south
~!~Y~~!Qn~~QmbineQ~~uld total the 720 sq. ft. of signage.
~- ---_.
....--
----..
Motion Regarding Sign Variances
!
-----
-----.-- -~
In connection with the sign variances, Vice Mayor Wische
moved to approve the recommendations. Commissioner Artis
seconded the motion which carried 5-0.
)
"
Motion Regarding Site Plan Modification
Commissioner Olenik moved to approve the site plan modifica-
tion for the Shoppes of Woolbright. Vice Mayor Wisch~
seconded the motion which carried 5-0.
Mayor Moore called a brief recess at 7:40 P.M.
resumed'at 7:50 P.M.
L~. - .--,.----
"
ordina~~es - 2nd Readin~ubliC Hearing
, "'-
1. proposed Qrdinance No. 90-1~
Re: Height Referendum
The meeting
, ~
I " Ci ty Attorney Ch'&,rof read
I caption only: "'-
\ "AN ORDINANCE OF i1m CITY COMMISSION
I '\
( BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIQA; SUBMITTING TO R
AMENDMENT TO APPENOIX"A, SECTION 4.F.l (HEIGHT
LIMITAT~~NS AND EXCEPTIONS); PROVIDING FOR MAXIMUM
~
dinance No. 90~7 b
o
13
.
ITEM 3, PARAGRAPH 3
ATTACHMENTS
. .
~ City of
'Boynton 'Beacli
100 'E. llJognton llJeacft llJoufevara
p.o. 1lJ~310
llJoynton llJeac.fi, J'forula 33425-0310
City :JlaU: (561) 375-6000
J'JlX: (561) 375-6090
'"
~-
December 9, 1996
Ms. Anna Cottrell, AICP
Basehart & Cottrell, Inc.
1532 Old Okeechobee Road, Suite 101
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
Re:
File No.:
Location:
Shoppes of Woolbright PCD - Sign Program
MSPM 96-005
Southeast and southwest comers of the intersection ofS.W. 8th Street and
Woolbright Road
Dear Ms. Cottrell,
Enclosed is the City of Boynton Beach Development Order regarding Commission approval of
your request for major site plan modification.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact this office at
(561) 375-6260.
Sincerely,
.---
!}
,~~://t-,"""L{vu. "....
Tambri J. Heyden, AI
Planning and Zoning Director
~'ckv
TJH:dar
Attachment
xc: Central File
Michael Morton
D:\SHARE\ WP\PROJECTS\SHPSWOOL \MSPM\DEVELORD.WPD
Jlmemas (jateway to tIU (julfstream
.
cZcZ.
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
OF THE
CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PlANNING AND
lONING DEPT.
APPLICANT: Michael Morton, Tradewinds Group
APPLICANT'S AGENT: Anna Cotrell. Aoent for the Tradewinds . Inc..
DATE OF HEARING BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: November 19. 1996
TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Maior Site Plan Modification. Reauestina approval to modify
the approved sian proaram. In addition to the freestandina sians that have alreadY been
approved, additional sianaoe is reauested. more specificallY. new freestandino
(monuments) and wall signaae for outparcels and main buildino tenant(s).
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Southeast and southwest corners of the intersection of S.W.
8th Street and Woolbrioht Road.
DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO.
THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of .
Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having
considered the relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant,
members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows:
1 . Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner
consistent with the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations.
2. The Appli"~.,.(
--.ZHAS
HAS NOT
established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested.
3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative
staff, or suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as
set forth on Exhibit "C" with the notation "Included".
4.
The Applicarrt's application for relief is hereby
~GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3
hereof.
.
_ DENIED
5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk.
6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the
terms and conditions of this order.
7.
Other:
DATED: November 19,1996
f
! I
. !
I
/
_:~~~J~ /~.0>.<;
City lerk
t
ITEM 3, PARAGRAPH 4
A TT ACHMENTS
. .
City of Boynton Beach
Development Services Department
Planning and Zoning Division
PO Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
561/ 375 - 6260
Fax: 561/375 - 6259
FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET
Date: 'j/~ I/~i 7
To:: ,/'iJ J:...C f'vbOlJ "I
Fax: ~/'I_ -ILoi./ .,':/,(:;{.,
_J '--'" .;...- I -...."')
Re: 34 of,.:'!':) OF aJ.:-:c/.6'.c I~/~I Pc?J - ~:/i:> f:e:r,CW &/>?m,-,drs
Sender:x!/
YOU SHOULD RECEIVEB PAGE(S), INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET. IF
YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL 561/375 - 6260.
<::1'7 -
. ( - DOL.j-5
k",", f CVv~
g,. ~O
n..,
I 1- d.d...l
.......
11-{1,+
11- 3 bLf-
( Po!,'ce)
[XLvin 4{{aJ11Ul )
( JOhn tv~ 1t1..~)
(Lt ft' I ;+i~ s)
Z Bld~ i ~'V1~ti~)
C r cf2-)
POLICE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO.
97-0045
TO:
FROM:
TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR
SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT ~
JULY 2,1997
SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT PCD-MASTER PLAN
MODIFICATION- 2nd REVIEW
DATE:
RE:
I have reviewed the above listed plans. I feel there is traffic flow concern in the area
oftbe Home Depot Garden Center. I propose that the 'CUSTOMER PICK-UP
ZONE" be shortened and not extend north of the access road to Shoppes of
Woolbright. Tbis area is already a traffic problem with customers blocking the area
of the intersection. Pick-up and temporary parking for the Garden Center needs
further design and consideration, prior to construction of the rest of the shopping
center.
I recommend a traffic signal be installed at the intersection of the access road and
S.W. 8 Street.
t
. ~. "-~.--- -- ..--
.-. II
I' r"
_ 1:1) :1
: ~"",,_, .....-0--
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director
Kevin John Hallahan ,Forester / Environmentalist kJII-
Shoppes of Woolbright PCD -Master Plan Modification
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
June 30, 1997
Recommendation
The applicant not be granted the request to substitute the 25 foot wide peripheral greenbelt along
the northeast property line of the peD with a 5 foot tall wall within a 10 foot wide landscape
buffer along the south side of Purple Heart Way. This peripheral greenbelt requirement is to
visually and aesthetically protect the residents of The Vinings from the commercial
improvements proposed in the above project location.
- --.....-,.------
., .,,;
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #97-320
RE:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Department Director
John Wildner, Parks superintendenr
Shoppes of Woolbright
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
July 15, 1997
There are no comments to this project. The project should continue in the normal
review process.
JW:ad
.
MEMORANDUM
Utilities # 97-229
oom
mOWI
iL: : ...'~
.. - . ... ::1':", ~
PlANNING AND
ZONING DEPl
TO:
Tambri Heyden.
Planning & Zon'
Date:
John A. Guidry, . 'j
Director of Utilities L
July 15, 1997
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Shoppes of Woolbright peD,
Proposed Master Plan Modifications, Second Review
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments:
I. Please show existing easements along the east property line, west of the canal
easement, (LDR Chapter 3, Art. IV Sec.3 (H and 1).
It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or
Peter Mazzella at 375-6404.
sm! woolpcd2
xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor
Peter Mazzella
File
.
ill
'j;
....v_
. , ,--'
. I ....... ~ .
"- I..... ~
rn@~uw~
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 97-174
PlANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning
FROM:
AI Newbold. Deputy Director of Development ~~~
DATE:
July 14, 1997
RE:
SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT PCD - MASTER PLAN MODIFlCA TION
2ND REVIEW
We have reviewed the above rcfercnccd plans and offcr the following comments.
Building Division
No objection
Engineering Division
I . Change "outparcel I" to Lot 2, change "outparcel 2" to Lot I and change "outparcel 3" to
remainder of Tract "c" to mirror "Woolbright 100" plat document. [Chapter 5, Article V,
Section I.e.]
2. Identify the roadway between Burger King and Discount Auto as "Tract A (private)" to
mirror "Woolbright I 00" plat document. [Chapter 5, Article V, Section I.C.]
3. Identify and locate the casement between Food Court and Discount Auto as a 27'
ingress/egress casement (private). [Chapter 5, Article V, Section I.C.]
4. Correct the dimension along the north property line of Burger King from 165.89 to 165.23 to
reflect the plat dimension.
5. Correct the dimension along the west property line of Discount Auto parcel from 167.97 to
167.86 to agree with plat dimension.
AN/ck
xc: Mike Haag
Ken Hall
Sebastian Puda
C:\My Documents\Shoppes ofWoolbrighl reD, Master Plan Mod. 2nd.doc
.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 97-364
FROM:
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP f?d
Planning and Zoning Director
Jerzy Lewicki, Acting Senior Planner -:J \..-
TO:
DATE:
June 30, 1997
SUBJECT: Shoppes of Woolbright PCD - Master Plan Modification, 2nd review
comments
File No. MPMD 97-002
Please be advised of the following comments relative to the second review of the
modified master plan for the above-referenced project:
1. The site signs shown on the submitted plan do not match the signs shown
on the approved sign program. Eliminate from the master plan the site .
signs from the following sites:
. Cracker Barrel,
. Race Trac,
. Home Depot.
2. The second free-standing sign on the Home Depot property has not been
permitted by the most recent sign program for Shoppes of Woolbright
PCD. Eliminate any reference to this sign from the master plan.
3. Modify the first note from the notes section of the master plan to read as
follows: "See plan for location and size of minimum required peripheral
greenbelt".
4. Amend the chart that identifies previous master plans to reflect the
appropriate date the master plan modification was approved by the City
Commission. Also, indicate that the approvals are subject to staff
comments.
t
Page 2
Memorandum No. 97-364
Shoppes of Woolbright PCD -
Master Plan Modification
File No. MPMD 97-002
5. The required time frame for the completion of the Industrial Access Road
(aka Mortons Way/Purple Heart Way), which is located within the PUD, is
September 7, 1997 and there is not a current application submitted for
improvements in the Woolbright Place PUD. Therefore, it is
recommended that the applicant make permit application for this road
within 30 days of the commission approval of the subject request and
complete the road by September 7,1997.
6. Submission of a rectified master plan showing compliance with the
conditions of approval for this request will be required to be submitted to
the Planning and Zoning Department, prior to certificates of occupancy for
Discount Auto or Food Court (whichever occurs first).
7. To provide consistency among all submittal elements, amend the request
letter to delete the request to change the 25 foot peripheral greenbelt for
a 10 foot peripheral greenbelt containing a 5 feet high masonry wall.
8. Correct the master plan to reflect the access between Burger King and
Discount Auto as an easement on the Burger King parcel as per the
recorded agreement and plat.
Central File
J:\SHRDATA\PLANNING\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\SHPSWOOL\SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT MOVE NORTH DRIVEWAY-
2ND REVIEW COMMENTS,DOC
'.
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-539
TO: Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Jerzy Lewicki
DATE: October 11, 1996
SUBJECT: Major Site Plan Modification - 1 st Review
Project: Shoppes of Woolbright PCD (Sign Program)
Location: SW 8th Street and Woolbright Road.
Agent: Michael Morton
File No.: MSPM 96-005
The following is a list of 1 st review comments regarding the modified site plan review of
the plans for the above-referenced project. The applicant shall understand that all
documents and plans submitted for site plan review are subject to additional comments.
I recommend that the applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the
comments, If the applicant is not intending to correct code deficiencies, he should contact
me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for
seeking relief from the code requirement.
1. Provide a clear identification system correlating the table of contents with the
submitted sheets. All cross-references included in the project shall be made in
reference to the sheet code as identified in the table of content.
2. On the site plan, sheet 2 of 9, distinguish locations of existing and proposed
signs.
3, No business identification (sign copy) was submitted for the monument sign
proposed for the northernmost portion of Parcel "C", Provide a note on the
master plan that the approval of this sign is limited to location only. A
subsequent submittal of the sign copy shall meet the conditions of this sign
program approval, otherwise future revised sign program (Major Site Plan
Modification) will have to be submitted for review and approval by the City
Commission.
4. On sheet 5 of 9, specifications for typical store signs are laid out. Clarify in
which locations these typical store signs are to apply.
5, All proposed signs must meet the minimum setback requirements of 10 feet. On
the master plan include all required setbacks. Also, provide colored elevation
drawings of the signs. No later than one week prior to the Planning and
Development Board meeting submit color samples of all materials to be used in
manufacturing and constructing the signs, If the new signage exceeds the
allowed number of colors (two plus white and black), an application to appeal the
number of colors allowed shall be submitted to the Planning and Zoning
Department no later than October 21, 1996. The sign program cannot violate
the code without the proper appeals/variances (it does not override the code).
Contact the Planning and Zoning Department regarding the appeal application,
fee, and process.
6. City's LDR, Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan allows only two (2) colors,
(except for white and black) to be used for signs in shopping centers. On the
site plan, sheet 2 of 9 include a tabular summary of all colors proposed for the
signage in this development. Mark with an asterisk colors already approved by
the City Commission.
Page 2
Memorandum No. 96-539
1 st Review - Major Site Plan Modification
Shoppes of Woolbright Sign Program
MSPM 96-005
7. If colored elevations of all proposed signs, as required by the LDR, Chapter 4,
Section D are not submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department one week
prior to the Planning and Development Board meeting, it is recommended that
the elevations go back before the Commission as a future site plan approval,
prior to application for permit.
8. Chapter 9 of the LDR, Community Design Plan, Section 10.1,2 requires that a
single sign style shall be used for wall signage on all buildings on the site.
Comply with this requirement of the city code or file an application for a
Community Design Plan appeal from this code provision.
9. Chapter 9 of the LDR, Community Design Plan, Section 10.1.8 allows only one
lettering style, in addition to the lettering styles of the nationally registered copy,
to be used by all tenants/outparcel owners in the PCD. Comply with this
requirement of the city code or file an application for a Community Design Plan
appeal from this code provision.
10. For the Home Depot property, two new pylon signs are proposed along the
frontage of Woolbright Road, approximately 220 feet apart. No business
identification (sign copy) was submitted for the easternmost sign, Provide a note
on the master plan that the approval of this sign is limited to location only.
11, Submit a rectified master plan for the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD showing
compliance with the conditions of all previous approvals, prior to the Planning
and Development Board meeting,
12. All monument signs shall provide appropriate, unobstructed cross-visibility at all
points of access as described in LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.H.
JL:dim
xc: Central File
a:shop-wol.wpd
1
..: rn w ~. rr
, I
OCT I 0 1996 ~
DEP ARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-088
PlANNI~!~ .!"')
ZONING IJtPT.
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
Widi4.A. Hukill, P.E.
W~f Development
FROM:
DATE:
October 9, 1996
RE:
WOOLBRIGHT PLACE PCD - SIGN PROGRAM REVIEW
We have reviewed subject documents and find as follows:
I. Reference sign locations by dimension to property lines. Chap.2 I, ArtJ, Sec.5B &
C, pg.21-2
2. Designate tenants for all ground signs. Chap.21, Art.!, Sec.5K, pg.21-3
3. Provide justification for proposing more than one pylon sign for Home Depot.
Chap.21, ArtJV, Sec.3B, pg.21-17
4. Provide justification for proposing additional ground signs on Parcel 3. Chap.2 I,
Art.IV, Sec.3G, pg.2 I - 17
5. Walmart and Discount Auto signs are limited to 64 sq. ft. Chap.21, Art.lV,
Sec .2B, pg.2 I - 16
6. Reader board for Burger King must be part of ground sign subject to code
specified maximum size. Chap.21, ArtJV, Sec.2D, pg.21-16
7. Show colors, lettering types, logos, Chap.9, Sec. 101, pg.9-5
8. RaceTrac wall sign is limited to code specified maximum size. Chap.21, Art.IV,
Sec.2C, pg.2 I - 16
WVH/ck
xc: Anthony Occhiuzzo, Bldg. Permit Administrator
Ken Hall, Eng. Plans Check Inspector
attachment: Bldg. Div. Plans
C:WOOLSIGN
RECREATION & PARK DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-464
~ ~ @ ~,U WI ~ @)
't, II/"
(: ~
i,.~.:: PLANN'~I" ,,~---...J
ZONlfJ~:'Dl'NJ1J
HI U'T,
--.,.,.""..........---......
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/ Environmentalist 1<2J. #
DATE: October 2, 1996
FROM:
SUBJECT: Shoppes of Woolbright PCD-Major Site Plan Modification(Sign Program) - 1st
review
The applicant should comment on any existing trees which may be affected by the placement of signs
within the scope of this project. The project should continue in the normal review process,
kjh
_" ~ eo., ,__ _"-I I ......,-J .,J~~
..... I
~'J1J1
rn~
rn 0 \VI rn ill
lIOI/IIIalS~OI'J
OCT I 4 1996 ~ -:....-::
'.~III
s.c.ay~
WlIIam G. YllnlaI'
.....MantIger
d S. WlweiIIlW1
AIlcrnlY
PWIY & Scnonf, P.A
LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT
~~
October 15,
1301' MiliTARY TRAIL
DELRA Y 8EACH, FLORIO'" 33....
Tambri J. Heyden~ AlCP
Director Planning and Zoning
City of Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach. FL 33425-0310
Dear Ms. Heyden:
Subje~t:
Techni~al Review Committee AgeDda
The Lake Worth Drainage District offers the following comments regarding the item(s)
on the October 15, 1996 meeting agenda:
1. Citrus Glen, PUD - No objection.
- 2. Shoppes of Woolbright. POD - No objection. However, a drainage review will be
required prior to construction.
3. Boynton Festive Center. No objection.
4. ITV Tower - No objection.
S. East Ridge (3rd Review) - Not in L WOO service area.
6. Woolbright Place Plat 2 - Preliminary Review. Would like copy of plat prior to
commenting.
As always. we thank you fOI being given the vpportlmity to comment.
Sincerely.
LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT
~~
Chief Inspector
SJW trofb
c: Ronald L. Crone. P.E.. P.L.S.. Assistant Manager, L WDD
Patrick A. Martin. P.E., District Engineer. L WOD
Detr.~ BNd1 & BccI Allen 4i8.5:J6G . B4ynbl e.ctI " w.&t Pun e.tI\ 737.~ . FAll (407) 4i6_~
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-492
FROM:
Carrie Parker, City Manager
Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Dept. Chief Field Insp.
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Sgt. Marlon Harris, Police Department
AI Newbold, Building Division
William Hukill, Director of Department of Development
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP, Planning & Zoning Director '79J;J
TO:
DATE:
September 26, 1996
RE:
SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES
1 st Review -
Major Site Plan Modification (Sign Program)
Project
Shoppes of Woolbright PCD
Location
Site located on the north side of Woolbright Road,
being bounded on the east by SCL Railroad and on
the west by L WDD E-4 Canal.
Agent
Anna S. Cottrell,
Basehart and Cottrell, Inc.
File No.
MSPM 96-005
Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project.
Site Plan Review approval for this project will be granted by the City Commission. To
ensure that the project stays on line with the review time frame, I request that the
plans and exhibits be reviewed and formal written comments transmitted to the
Director of the Planning and Zoning Department no later than 5:00 P.M. on
October 15. 1996.
If you believe the plans are substantially complete with regards to code
compliance and that your outstanding comments and/or recommendations may
be addressed at time of permit review rather than requiring the applicant to
prepare amended plans for a 2nd submittal indicate in your 1st review written
comments that you recommend the project proceed to the Planning and
Development Board and City Commission for approval. If you recommend the
project move forward for approval with one review, please attach the 1st review
plans to your written comments, with the exception of the Development
Department which may retain the plans as the control plans for the project.
Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and
enable the applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval:
1. Use the review standards specified in Part III, Land Development Regulations,
Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Section 8 of the Code of Ordinances to review and
formulate comments.
2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially
complete based on the submittal requirements identified in Section 7 of the Site
Page 2 of 2
Shoppes of Woolbright PCD
To: TRC Members
Re: Planning & Zoning Memo 96-492
Plan Review Ordinance. However, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements
is insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or
the documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be
requested by the reviewer through the Planning and Zoning Department.
3, Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on
the documents.
4. Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the
plans depict or when the location and installation of their departmental required
improvements may conflict with other departmental improvements.
5. When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review
responsibility, the comment and the specific code section may be included in their
review comments with the name of the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible
for the review specified,
6, If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memo, within
the time frame stated above, to the Planning and Zoning Director stating that the
plans are approved and they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for
review and recommend the project be forwarded through the approval process.
All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted to the Director of the Planning and
Zoning Department for distribution to the applicant. Please include the name and phone
number of the reviewer on this memo. Jerzy Lewicki will be the Planning and Zoning
Department staff member coordinating the 1 st review of the project.
The Planning and Zoning Department will send the applicant a cover letter which includes
the comment(s) and directions to amend the plans to comply with the comments and the
procedures for resubmission, When the Planning and Zoning Department receives the
amended plans, they will distribute the plans with a cover memo to all TRC Members for
review and approval.
T JH:bme
Attachment
xc: (Memo Only)
Jim Ness, Acting Fire Chief
Charlie Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director
Marshall Gage, Police Chief
John Guidry, Utilities Director
Central File
A: 1 REVRACE.wpd
'l'RAC.......N~ LUG - SI'l'E I:' LAN REV JEW LJUBMI'f'l'AL
PRuJl:;C'l' 'l'l'l'LE:
ul:;:;)CRIP'l'lON:
'1' Y P E :
DA'l'E REC' D:
SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT peD (SIGN PROGRAM)
FILE NO. :MSPM 96-005
NEW SITE PLAN
9/25/96 AMOUNT:
MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION
kJ::CEIPT NO.:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
'rWELVE (12) SETS SUBMITTED:
COLORED ELEVATIONS REC'D:
(Plans shall be pre-assembled. The planning & Zoning Dept. will number each
sheet of their set. The Plannillg Dept. set will be used to check the
remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match.)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
APPLICATION & SUBMITTAL:
DATE:
ACCEPTED
DENIED
DATE:
DATE OF LET'rER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES:
2nd SUBMIT'I'AL :
DATE:
ACCEPTED
DENIED
DATE:
DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER:
REVIEWER'S NAME:
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
#
(Label TRC Departments on each set of plans)
DATE AND MEMO NUMBER OF MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW.
DATE SEN'l': ~RETUkN DATE: 10/11/96 MEMO NUMBER: 96-492
1st REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED
~~~~ . +
Parks --y-
E'ire =r=
Police --->::-
MEMO It 1 DATE / '~C"
~.~ /.-!!JJL C/
'1,,):~i3 ~ (;.'1;-.' ~(';;/
4~'~1I !~/~
() " / ~/ C-
PLANS
'/
MEMO It 1 DA'l'E 1 "e"
9G.0j{'J 1 fa/a /~
, / I 1_
'K,.>-8yg /~/-D-
/ 1-
0(P-%4' 1 IG/A /(!/
I
Planning
BUilding
Engineer
Engineer
J:"'orester
y
~YP~ OF VAR!ANCE(S)
DATE OF MEETING:
DA'l'E OF LETTJ::R ~ENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS:
(Aesthetic Review App., dates of board mtga. ~ checklist sent out w/ comments
NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID:
DATE 12 COMPLETE SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW:
(Must be assembled. Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents)
COLORBD ELEVATIONS RBC I D I
MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PBRFORM 2nd RBVIEW.
DA'l'E SENT: MEMO It:
RETURN DATE:
2nd REVIEW RECOMMENDATION/DENIAL
PLANS HBHO ., I DATB I"R/U" PLANS HEMO ., / DATE I"R/D"
Util. I / Planning I I
P.W. / I 8uilding I /
Parks / 1 Engineer / /
Fire / 1 Engineer 1 1
Police / / Forster / /
LETTER TO APPLICANT RBOARDINO TRC APPROVAL/DBNIAL AND LAND DEVBLOPHBNT aXONS
PLACSD AT 'l'HS PROPERTY OATS 8BNT/SION8 INSTALLBD:
SCHEDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD
CC/CRA
DA'l'E APPROVAL LE'l'TER SENT:
A: 'l'RACKING.:;)1'
{I
.51.
ill
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #96-223
PLANNING AND
ZONING OEPT
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director \{
THRU:
FROM:
Larry Quinn, Sanitation Superintendent
SUBJ:
Major Site Plan Modification - Shoppes of Woolbright PCD
DATE:
October 4, 1996
The Public Works Department has no problems with the above site plan, The project should
proceed to the Planning & Development Board and City Commission for approval.
,7
~'
/
/
arry Quinn
Sanitation Superintendent
LQ/cr
"---
MEMORANDUM
Utilities # 96-321
TO: Tambri Heyden.
Planning & Zoni
FROM: John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilities
Date: October 7, 1996
SUBJECT: Shoppes of Woolbright peD,
Major Site Plan Modification, Sign Program, First Review
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments:
Utilities has no comment.
It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or
Peter Mazzella at 375-6404.
sm/woolpcd2
xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor
Peter Mazzella/;-/
File
ill
OCT 2 5 1996
r"l '"".."'''''"
IS i!'1 \ ,
G li!!l
II!)'
rn@rn~~l
FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-311
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Director
Planning & Zoning Department
FROM:
William D. Cavanaugh, FPO I
Fire Department
A0f. (ka~~'tC
DATE:
October 25, 1996
RE:
Shoppes of Woolbright PCD
Woolbright Rd. between SCL Railroad &
L WOD E-4 Canal
MSPM 96-005
We have no objections at this time.
cc: Deputy Chief Ness
FPO II Campbell
File
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
'Ii) m & ffi .~ \'f} ffi ~
Ul1 OCT 2 IE ~
TO:
T AMBRI HEYDEN
PLANNING & ZONING
DIRECTOR
DATE:
October 1, 1 996
SUBJECT: SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT
MAJOR SITE PLAN - SIGN PROGRAM
FROM:
SGT. MARLON HARRISA~~FERENCES:
POLICE DEP AR TMENT '//7/r
0264
ENCLOSURES:
I have reviewed the above plans regarding the sign program and have no comments.
TR( '0264WPD
1
w ~ f";1
.. i II l
" i
cr 10196 IW,
PlANN1}~': .!.' ")
ZONING l.J PT,
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-088
TO:
Tambri 1. Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
Nlifr/J Hukill, P.E.
W~f Development
FROM:
DATE:
October 9, 1996
RE:
WOOLBRIGHT PLACE PCD - SIGN PROGRAM REVIEW
We have reviewed subject documents and find as follows:
1. Reference sign locations by dimension to property lines. Chap.21, Art.I, Sec.5B &
C, pg.21-2
2. Designate tenants for all ground signs. Chap.21, Art.1, Sec.5K, pg.21-3
3. Provide justification for proposing more than one pylon sign for Home Depot.
Chap.21, Art.IV, Sec.3B, pg.21-17
4. Provide justification for proposing additional ground signs on Parcel 3. Chap.21,
Art.IV, Sec.3G, pg.21-17
5. Walmart and Discount Auto signs are limited to 64 sq. ft. Chap.21, Art.IV,
Sec.2B, pg.21-16
6. Reader board for Burger King must be part of ground sign subject to code
specified maximum size. Chap.21, Art.IV, Sec.2D, pg.21-16
7. Show colors, lettering types, logos. Chap.9, Sec.1 01, pg.9-5
8. RaceTrac wall sign is limited to code specified maximum size. Chap.21, Art.IV,
Sec.2C, pg.21-16
WVH/ck
xc: Anthony Occhiuzzo, Bldg. Permit Administrator
Ken Hall, Eng, Plans Check Inspector
attachment: Bldg. Div. Plans
C:WOOLSIGN
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #96-483
ill ~ ~1 ~ ~~" ill
FROM:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
John Wildner, Parks SUPerinlzndentr
Shoppes of Woolbright - Sign Program
TO:
RE:
DATE:
October 17, 1996
The Recreation & Park Division has reviewed the plans for Shoppes of Woolbright - Sign Program.
There are no recreation related comments. The project may continue through the normal review
process.
JW:ad
RECREATION & PARK DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-464
TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/ Environmentalist 1<~ #
DATE: October 2, 1996
SUBJECT: Shoppes of Woolbright PCD-Major Site Plan Modification(Sign Program) - 1st
review
The applicant should comment on any existing trees which may be affected by the placement of signs
within the scope of this project. The project should continue in the normal review process.
kjh
, 0-1 1 - , 996 4: 45P~~
FPO~1 LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE 561 495 9694
P 1
.... '-
rn n \VI rn
00 IOMfdS~
U - Sla1!t1'f w.-r
I<tn'nlt Oell
I.~IIl
~~
'MIlaM G. WI".,.
........."..,
d S. WhMilhen
Attorn.~
Perry & SQllone. PA
~.J'IJ'I
rn
OCT I 4 \996
LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT
~~
October 15,
13081 MILlTARV TRAIL
CELRAY BEACH. FLORIOA 33484
Tambri J. Heyden, AlCP
Director Planning and Zoning
City of Boynton Beach
P,O. Box 310
Boynton Beach. FL 33425-0310
Dear Ms. Heyden;
Subjeet:
T~hni~al Review Committee AgeDda
The Lake Worth Drainage District offers the following comments regarding the item(s)
on the October 15, 1996 meeting agenda:
1. Citrus Glen, pun - No objection.
_ 2. Shoppes ofWoolbrigh~ POD - No objection. However, a drainage review will be
required prior to construction.
3. Boynton Festive Center... No objection.
4. ITV Tower - No objection.
S. East Ridge (3rd Review) - Not in L WOO service area.
6. Woolbright Place Plat 2 - Preliminary Review. Would like copy of plat prior to
commenting.
As al",ays. we thank you for being given the opportWlity to comment.
Sincerely.
LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT
~~
Chief Inspector
SJW /mfb
c: Ronald L. Crone. P.E.. P.L.S.. Assistant Manager, L WDn
Patrick A. Martin. P .E., District Engineer~ L WDD
Ceny 8..ch & Bcc:a RIIlDn ....5363 . BoyrlfDl'l SMdl & w..! PaIIll EleaGh 737.383S . FAX (4C1) ~i4
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-539
TO: Tambri J, Heyden
Planning and Zoning Director
Jerzy Lewicki :J I/--
DATE: October 11, 1996
FROM:
SUBJECT: Major Site Plan Modification - 1 st Review
Project: Shoppes of Woolbright PCD (Sign Program)
Location: SW 8th Street and Woolbright Road.
Agent: Michael Morton
File No.: MSPM 96-005
The following is a list of 1 st review comments regarding the modified site plan review of
the plans for the above-referenced project. The applicant shall understand that all
documents and plans submitted for site plan review are subject to additional comments.
I recommend that the applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the
comments, If the applicant is not intending to correct code deficiencies, he should contact
me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for
seeking relief from the code requirement.
1. Provide a clear identification system correlating the table of contents with the
submitted sheets. All cross-references included in the project shall be made in
reference to the sheet code as identified in the table of content.
2. On the site plan, sheet 2 of 9, distinguish locations of existing and proposed
signs.
3. No business identification (sign copy) was submitted for the monument sign
proposed for the northernmost portion of Parcel "C". Provide a note on the
master plan that the approval of this sign is limited to location only, A
subsequent submittal of the sign copy shall meet the conditions of this sign
program approval, otherwise future revised sign program (Major Site Plan
Modification) will have to be submitted for review and approval by the City
Commission.
4. On sheet 5 of 9, specifications for typical store signs are laid out. Clarify in
which locations these typical store signs are to apply.
5. All proposed signs must meet the minimum setback requirements of 10 feet. On
the master plan include all required setbacks. Also, provide colored elevation
drawings of the signs. No later than one week prior to the Planning and
Development Board meeting submit color samples of all materials to be used in
manufacturing and constructing the signs. If the new signage exceeds the
allowed number of colors (two plus white and black), an application to appeal the
number of colors allowed shall be submitted to the Planning and Zoning
Department no later than October 21, 1996, The sign program cannot violate
the code without the proper appeals/variances (it does not override the code),
Contact the Planning and Zoning Department regarding the appeal application,
fee, and process,
6. City's LDR, Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan allows only two (2) colors,
(except for white and black) to be used for signs in shopping centers, On the
site plan, sheet 2 of 9 include a tabular summary of all colors proposed for the
signage in this development. Mark with an asterisk colors already approved by
the City Commission.
Page 2
Memorandum No. 96-539
1 st Review - Major Site Plan Modification
Shoppes of Woolbright Sign Program
MSPM 96-005
7. If colored elevations of all proposed signs, as required by the LDR, Chapter 4,
Section D are not submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department one week
prior to the Planning and Development Board meeting, it is recommended that
the elevations go back before the Commission as a future site plan approval,
prior to application for permit.
8. Chapter 9 of the LDR, Community Design Plan, Section 10.1.2 requires that a
single sign style shall be used for wall signage on all buildings on the site.
Comply with this requirement of the city code or file an application for a
Community Design Plan appeal from this code provision.
9. Chapter 9 of the LDR, Community Design Plan, Section 10.1.8 allows only one
lettering style, in addition to the lettering styles of the nationally registered copy,
to be used by all tenants/outparcel owners in the PCD. Comply with this
requirement of the city code or file an application for a Community Design Plan
appeal from this code provision.
10, For the Home Depot property, two new pylon signs are proposed along the
frontage of Woolbright Road, approximately 220 feet apart. No business
identification (sign copy) was submitted for the easternmost sign. Provide a note
on the master plan that the approval of this sign is limited to location only,
11. Submit a rectified master plan for the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD showing
compliance with the conditions of all previous approvals, prior to the Planning
and Development Board meeting.
12. All monument signs shall provide appropriate, unobstructed cross-visibility at all
points of access as described in LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.
JL:dim
xc: Central File
a:shop-wol.wpd
,
EXHIBIT "e"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Shoppes of Woolbright PCD
File number: COPA 96-003
Reference: Community Design Plan appeal - number of colors for siQnage
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT !
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments: None
FIRE
Comments: None
,
I
POLICE
Comments: None
-
ENGINEERING DIVISION
"
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: None
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: None
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
1. Delete the color green. ~
2. Replace the color grey with white. ../
3. Choose between dark blue and royal blue, If dark blue is chosen. change the /
royal blue on the existing pylon sign.
I 4.! Change the color yellow to a yellow shade of orange. /'
'-"" ~
5, Change the RaceTrac dark blue to black.
14 Remove yellow from the RaceTrac sign and replace with white, which is one /
of RaceTrac's colors,
-=- /
7, Remove the roval blue from the existina Dvlon sian on Woolbriaht Road.
~
pe~- v1,{ {I +tIY
+- l/U,A_{ \Jj CU 1--(
~ .
~~~
M ·
L" ~
. . ~~
l' _ ,-.fJ~f-~
) .;fr':.1 r /
jrd~~ --
~