Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS DEVELvPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 97-392 FROM: Kerry Willis City Manager Tambri J. HeYden7[j.4 Planning and Zoning Director TO: DATE: July 22, 1997 SUBJECT: Response to July 18, 1997 correspondences from Jim Cherof and Brian Joslyn Please be advised of the following with respect to the July 18, 1997 letter to Mr. Cheraf from Mr. Joslyn, attorney for Michael Morton: 1. Item 3 , paragraph 1 - The attached sketch made part of the referenced November 1995 agreement specifies the location of a hedge (on the north side of Morton's Way), but does not address the location of the code required buffer wall. Police, Utilities, Planning and Zoning, and the Forester (all IRC concerned about the buffer wall) recommend that the buffer wall be located along the south side of Morton's Way. Therefore, there is no conflict among staff with the respect to the wall location and no need for a subsequent meeting with Mr. Morton regarding this issue. 2. Item 3, paragraph 2 - Regarding the referenced freestanding sign, please see the attached Planning and Zoning Memorandum No. 97-369 from myself to Mr. Cherof. Staff did not eliminate this sign, the City Commission denied Mr. Morton's request for an additional sign in 1990. Since Mr. Morton has never finished the master plan rectification process since 1990, the denied sign is still showing the plans. Mr. Morton's concern over this denial came up again when he revised his sign program in 1996. The City Commission did not change their 1990 decision. Mr. Morton is refusing to accept this and remove it from the plans. The last settlement agreement requires that Morton' s Way be constructed by September 7, 1997. Staff comments indicate this should be completed on time, although Mr. Morton has not yet applied for a permit. Furthermore, he has not requested a revision to the agreement. This is the extent of the rectified master plan issues. However, if you feel the need for a meeting with Mr. Morton regarding these issues, please let me know the meeting date and I will be more than happy to attend. 3. Item 3, paragraph 3 - The development order for the referenced master sign program was mailed to Mr. Morton's agent, Anna Cottrell, on December 9, 1996 as is the city's policy (see attached transmittal letter). 4. Item 3, paragraph 4 - Second review comments were faxed to Mike Morton on 7/21/97 from all TRC members, with the exception of the fire department. The fire department's comments were not received until today and were faxed to Mr. Morton today (see attached fax verifications). TJH:dim Attachments Cc: Jim Cherof Al Newbold TRC Representatives Mike Haag Jerzy Lewick Sebastian Puda Bill Cavanaugh Sgt. Marlon Haris Skip Milor Mark Lips John Wildner Kevin Hallahan \\CH\MAIN\SHRDA T A \Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\SHPSWOOL \request memo,doc . ITEM 3, PARAGRAPH 1 ATTACHMENTS . t /1J ' I' !JI/: RESOLUTION NO. RS ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT BE'IWEEN THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH AND HOWARD SCHARLIN, TRUSTEE FOR WOOLBRIGHT PLACE, JOINT VENTURE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Tradewinds Development Corporation and the City of Boynton Beach have heretofore been engaged in lengthy litigation over the development of property located in Boynton Beach, Florida, which litigation is subject to stipulations and judgments entered in Palm Beach County Circuit Court, Case Nos. CL 86-3661 and CL 87-1638 AE; and WHEREAS, Howard Scharlin, Trustee for Woolbright Place, Joint Venture, is the successor in interest to the rights of :! Tradewinds and is the sole owner of the property which was the I subject of the above referenced litigation; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to enter into an Agreement, I which shall supersede all previous agreements, stipulations ,: and judgments concerning the rights of the parties as it I relates to the development of the subject property; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF I THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT~ I Section 1. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby i authorized and directed to execute an Agreement between the City of Boynton Beach and Howard Scharlin, Trustee for : Woolbright Place, Joint Venture, which Agreement is attached :: hereto as Exhibit "A". ': 'I :: Section 2. That this Resolution :! effective immediately upon passage. shall become , ,I PASSED AND ADOPTED this /~ day of ~#V , 1995. ! ;1 I: 'I ~ I II 'I I " " :1 ,: I ;i I II II i! I I I il ATTEST: , ::~~9~~<U-. I Ci Y Clerk I (Corporate Seal) Autheig.doQ ~r.d'~lftd','lft.1Agr ./12195 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT is entered into between THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH ("CITY"), and HOWARD SCHARLIN, TRUSTEE for WOOLBRIGHT PLACE JOINT t':,. '. /." Y6/-z. to" ,- c VENTURE ("SCHARLINIl) , this /? day of // /G ' , 1995. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, TRADEWINDS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, acting for the Woolbright Place Joint Venture ("Woolbrightll) and the CITY have heretofore been engaged in lengthy litigation over the development of property located in Boynton Beach, Florida, which litigation is subject to stipulations and judgments entered in Palm Beach County circuit Court, Case No. CL 86-3661 AE and CL 87-1638 AE; and WHEREAS, Howard Schar1in, Trustee for Woolbright Place, Joint venture, is the true party in interest to the rights of TRADEWINDS and is the sole owner of the property which was-, the subj ect of the above referenced litigation; and WHEREAS, Scharlin desires to enter into an Agreement with the . . CITY which shall confirm the good standing of the parties under the stipulations and judgements entered in the above referenced litigation, and; WHEREAS, the parties have engaged in negotiations which are intended to resolve 'all current and future development issues with respect to the real property identified in the above referenced litigation, inclUding issues involving the interpretation of ,the previous stipulations entered into between the parties and the Court Orders implementing same; and Final 5/16/95 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed upon the terms that will bring the litigation between them to a final conclusion in a manner which is equally beneficial to all interested parties, and to the citizens of the CITY; and WHEREAS, SCHARLIN has represented to the CITY that Scharlin is the only party who holds legal title to the property which is the subject of this litigation and represents all those with equitable interests therein, or who has standing to enforce the stipulations and Orders entered into in the above referenced litigation. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants expressed and exchanged herein the parties agree as follows: 1. The foregoing whereas clauses are true and correct. 2. All references to SCHARLIN herein shall mean Howard Scharl!n, Trustee as authorized representative of owners of 100% of beneficial interest in Woolbright, his successors or assigns. 3. INDUSTRIAL ACCESS ROAD: SCHARLIN shall construct the industrial access road centered within a 50' public right-of-way along the northern boundary of the PCD within twenty-one (21) months of the date of this agreement including, but not limited to, curbs and drainage. In return, the CITY agrees to abandon or convey to SCHARLIN the southernmost 30' of the industrial road right-at-way. The road shall be built in accordance with applicable design standards and with the typical cross section depicted on attached Exhibit'IIA". The design shall incorporate ~ west bound left turn lane on the industrial access road onto S.W. 8th street, a sidewalk along the north side of the road from S.W. 8th street to Final 5/16/95 the eastern terminus of the road, with curbs and gutters along both sides, and a continuous ficus hedge along the property line which separates the PCD from the Vinings Development. "SCHARLIN shall provide surety for the roadway improvements in the man~er prescribed by the CITY's Land Development Cod~. The CrTY agrees that SCHARLIN may have no more than three (3) points of ingress and egress to the PCD from the industrial access road, provided the access points are located following the customary approval process for the location of drive~ays. 4 . LANDSCAPE BERM. In addition to other berms or walls which are required to be constructed in the PCD or PUD, SCHARLIN shall construct irrigated landscape berm along the west boundary of the PCD and PUD, less the church parcel, within three months of the execution of this Agreement. The berm height shall be measured from the elevation on the Leisureville side of the berm and may ~ consist of five (5) feet of earthen berm and a ficus hedge. The berm shall be landscaped along its high point with a continuous ficus hedge planted and maintained in accordance with the memo dated May II, 1995, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "C". 5. VESTING: The CITY agrees that any and all CITY and County impact fees which are required to be paid for the PUD and PCD shall be calculated at the fee rate in effect in November, 1986 and the CITY shall collect such 1986 impact fee 'from the applicant as development orders are issued and as a condition precedent to the issuance of any building permits. SCHARLIN shall pay all other building and permitting fees in effect at the time of applic~ion. Final 5/16/95 To the extent that a category of impact fee did not exist in 1986 and was thereafter implemented by the CITY and/or County SCHARLIN shall not be required to pay such fees. The CITY is not a party to any agreement between SCHARLIN and Palm Beach County regarding County impact fees. The CITY shall remit to the County any impact fees paid by SCHARLIN to the CITY for County impact fees but the CITY shall have no additional liability to SCHARLIN or the county if the County demands additional fees, and SCHARLIN shall hold CITY harmless from any such liability. 6. USES IN THE PCD: The parties agree that all uses permitted under current PCD or C-J zoning regulations are permissible in the boundaries of the current PCD, subj ect to conditional use approv~l by the City commission when so designated in the city Code'. By way of example: fast food restaurants are a ' permitted use, restaurants with drive thru are a conditional use~ requiring Commission approval. 7. FORCED AIR BURNING: The CITY agrees to permit one (1) controlled air/forced air burning on the site, from the date of this agreement, subject to Fire Department approval and proper atmospheric conditiQns. 8. GARDEN CENTER/ACCESSORY USE: The CITY acknowle~ges that the Home Depot Outdoor Garden Center is an accessory use and that said Garden Center shall not be included as part of the retail gross leasable area. 9. REVIEW PROCEDURE: The CITY and SCHARLIN agree that the development review procedure attached hereto as Exhibit "B" shall be implemented and applied to all applications by SCHARLIN for Final 5/16/95 further construction permitting on the property. The CITY further agrees that upon receipt of applications as required by applicable ordinances, it shall process maste~ plan modifications and site plans in accordance with the schedule attached as Exhibit "B". 10. SCHARLIN shall be required to bond all required subdivision improvements including on and off-site improvements required by CITX Code. 11. MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION: Nothing herein shall prevent SCHARLIN from seeking modification of the current master plan. Notwithstanding any previous requirement, additional commercial buildings need not be attached to the Home Depot Garden Center. Master Plan modifications shall be conducted in accordance with the procedures in place at time of application for same. 12. PHASE DEVELOPMENT: The CITY agrees that SCHARLIN shall have the right to phase development of the PCD and/or the PUD as .., well as sever portions of the property from the PUD or PCD, provided, however, that the phasing of any improvements whi~h are required by the subdivision and platting regulations shall be in accordance with the revised master plans submitted by SCHARLIN and approved by the CITY, and phasing of said improveman~a is reasonably related to the land uses that are proposed in the particular phase. 13. ADDITIONAL CURB CUTS: Notwithstanding any prior agreement, SCHARLIN may request additional curb cuts along S.W. 8th street. Approval shall be subject to customary review and hearing for traffic flow and safety considerations. 14. RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT: Upon execution of this Final 5/16/95 Agreement by both parties and approval by Court order all prior stipulations, agreements, letters of understanding, negotiations shall be deemed in good standing and satisfied and the future rights of the parties shall be governed by this Agreement and the applicable provisions of the CITY Code of ordinances, as that Code is amended from time to time. SCHARLIN shall provide to the CITY A. /'''-; f' a General Release from SCHARLIN, '~,;i~~'~~::!~7 M:-;' ~j}..--:"l4' WOOLBRIGHT PLACE, JOINT VENTURE, and MICHAEL MORTON . (/?t I r releasing the CITY from all claims or actions accrued or outstanding which either has or may assert against the CITY, except those claims or actions which may accrue in the future based upon either party I s failure to comply with any provision of this Agreement. 15. COMMISSION/COURT APPROVAL: This Agreement shall have no force and effect until approved by a majority of the CITY Commission and the entry of an Order approving a Stipulation for Settlement and Dismissal referencing the terms of this Agreement. 16. ATTORNEY FEES: SCHARLIN shall pay to the CITY Five Thousand ($5,000.00) Dollars, representing attorney fees and costs incurred by the CITY in this action. 17. CODE COMPLIANCE: The parties agree that unless herein stipulated, all current and future activities will be governed by city Codes and Regulations in force and effect upon the date of application tor an activity. 18 . REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS: SCHARLIN agrees to complete construction of all required improvements including, but not limited to, the industrial access road referenced in paragraph 3 Final 5/16/95 above, and previously required landscaping. SCHARLIN further agrees to provide 110% surety for all required improvements and to complete the required improvement within twenty-one (21) months of tpe date of the CIT~ Comm!ssion accep,tanqe o~this ~greement. 19. RIGHT-OF-WAY LICENSING AGREEl-rENT: The parties agree that the Grant of License by the CITY to SCHARLIN as recorded with Palm Beach County on December 11, 1990 (90-352210, Official Record Book 6667, Page 103) remains in full force and effect. The parties agree to correct an error in the legal description contained therein. 20. ENFORCEABILITY: Nothing herein shall constitute a waiver on the part of either party to seek judicial enforcement of the terms of this Agreement. This Agreement shall be binding on all successors or assigns of SCHARLIN. THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH by: ATTEST: (CITY Seal) - 1.9,- JAC/lms 900304 AGREE. 1 H' rd Scharl!n, Trustee of ~OOl right Place Joint ven~ " / r;9 t:.:'(/~' .::e/~ I ,J:.. t:L\--/.C ~'/ ./l( -L;~/'~ ~ ; ( lei ~f;. / Final 5/16/95 , \ .... ?t \- - \\) =t :t z - \J\ u .... ... - .~ \) ~ .~ %: -<t - -<:) l.C") Mia :l , sl ~a! ~~~ aL~ ~ ' ::~ ~-J: . ~~ ~~ "i' - . I l ; Ut \(t ii\l'~: i\i\~ i )j ";1-" , ,\ I\. II. 3 i. \0 '-' ~ 3-: ~~"'~ . \,). \;;. : ~, '" . Q tl ': \I. S~ ~ ~. ~~ :-. ~ ~~9 1:: l' i~ ~ ~, \I\~ () ~"-\lI~ ~ .~ ~QV\~ 1= \J, .... -- ~t c.a .' t-a (f): - .- i I \ I; \ ~ II \ I ~ ,\ I I o i " . ,. ~, ~ ~ \J - ... ~ ''f ~ " ~ ~ t ')- ~ ~ cL \1\" ~ 3 \ ~ ..~ + \lJ ,.c:;. ~ '2 ~ ~ ~, Ci ....,~ o ~ .(. J:: ( Cl: '" :2 ;) \ - t-t Q ~ ~~ lU 'Jc V) s "i -: C> ~~ ~ \ P- flJ' ~ ( o t~ 1L ~ II 0:. Q~ t :)1" . ~ S~~: & Z1n :t ~~~ ~ ~~~ ,.. 51 ') ""U () ~ () ~ ~~~ ~ .. - EXHIBIT B The following procedure shall be implemented and followed by both SCHARLIN and the CITY in the filing and processing of all requests for development approval: step 1. SCHARLIN contacts the Planning Director to Schedule a pre-application meeting. Step 2.. Written documentation outlining request should be submitted to the Planning Director no less than five (5) business days prior to pre-application meeting. This will permit the Planning Director to make appropriate inquiries of other staff members. Step J. Pre-application meeting with staff. Staff will provide comments at this meeting. step 4. Formal submission of application by Tradewinds. step 5. Staff will review application within ten (10) business days. step 6. . Planning Director will provide written response on or before tenth (lOth) business day following submission. step 7. Application will be placed on the P&D .agenda for next P&D meeting, it P&D meeting will occur within two (2) weeks. If P&D meeting is not within two (2) weeks, a special P&D meeting will be called. Developer may, at its discretion, request delay ot the Planning and Development Board meeting but such request must be in writing. step 8. FOllowing P&D action, application placed on next City commission agenda. Final 5/16/95 . In the event that public notice is required by city ordinance or state law tor public hearing, then in that event, the scheduling of meetings under step 7 and step 8 shall be extended to meet the notice requirements of law. Final 5/16/95 . '.....nc; '''U/I/~ IlijSUU::~Jj... COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. 1C07 OCeAN DRIY! I eOYHTON lEACH. 'LOAlDA >>Ctl m MMI2M ~ MEMO ENGI EERfNG_ ; To: Fronn Subject: Date: CAJUUE PARKER., CITY MANAGER. PETER. J. KELLY, PRESIDENT. PALM SEACH LElSUREVIUE MEETING REOARDJNG BERM ETC. 8TH AVE May 11. 1995 Today, r met with Mr. Houliban. Mr. HaJJ and Mike Monon.Tbls mudn, wu called 10aether by Mr. Kert HaU. After discussion, the forlowina was .areed upon pendin.approvaJ 9'tho City Mlnapr. 1. Berm to b. minimum oC 5 tcot blah with . 3 pl. Hod,. planted on top. ThI. berm it 10 bo lapered and hedS' planted to point oflntorsoctJon orold at new rOld. 2. Hedse to be continued ltom thac point to the utlU&y box on Welt ltd. orlth Ave. and will be a '811 heds" J. Jrrigatlon win bo COMected Into PB lAl.ure\lill. mSldon system. 4.Mr. Morton will do the berm p1antinl and bedpnllftd aD COMectiOns to Uris.tion system. 5. H. will b. respolW"bl. tor maJntainln. the entire berm and be respcnJlbI. tor the itrfption. , . . 6. PB Lei.umW. wiD maintain the hedS' ft'om the polDt orlnt.r.ectloa 10 tho one! orthe hedS-. W. will also inipt. th.lr.. A11lh. above COftdIdoDl .... ...._ upon only Ittbcy .1* with the condltloftl .ee forth by M.: Curio Parker, City Manalcr. Thant you. co. P/lOIW' WJ 1 .,.""'1'7 - f# t. ... . . Po8t.ft'"FpNotl ,. (J CoJOepL 1111 0.. ,... <<I It U -----e'-.( C TIll II1T.....r PRlPAIlID IY .. RETUlII TO: JAMiI A. CHEJIOf, 11GU11t1 JO$IAS & GORP, , .A. 3099 Ease c....-cl.l IGuleY.rd Sui c. 200 Fort Lauderdale. Il 33308 O)JEUI: ~ELBA8B KNOW ALL HEN BY 'l'HESE l?EmS~NTS; That WOOLBRIGHT PLACE JOINT VENTV~E, first party, ~or ~nd in consideration o~ the sum of Ten and NO/lOO ($10.00) DOLLARS, or other valuable considerations, received from or on behalf of THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, second party, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged. (Wherever used herein the terms "first party" and "second party" aball include singular and plural, heirs, legal representatives, and assigns or individuals, and the successors and assigns ot corporations, WhArever tbe context so admits or requires). HBREBY remiae, releas.. , acquit ,_,satisfy '. r1fore~e~L ~i.ctlarQ'. _ l.O i~ 'tWo Q,.~c ..... -r~'" ~\lrt'." ,. ^..,.., ...e:f~~ HfJ"'.z.......J illl Ifbol.U,4f"lfl'- a:t1 ~ \,I.,~ 1 .cd 11-1- 4, 41 the said second party, of and ~om al~, an all mannar ot action ~ and actions, cause and causes or action, suit., debt., dues, suma of money, accounts, reckonings, bonds, bills, specialtia., covananta, ., contracts, ccntroversl.., agreement., promises, variance., trespassec, dama9GB, judgments, executiona, claims and demands whatsoaver, in law ~r in aqui~y, which said ~irst party aver had, now ha'S, or which any personal. representatives, successor, heir or ...iqn of said first party, hereafter can, shall or may have, aqainst said secona party, tor, upon or by reason o~ .~. ~ -. f any matter, cause or thing vhat'aoever, ~rom the beginning of the world to the day ot these pr,eseutu. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I 1 have ~lereunto set my hand and seal this ~ day ot )M,o/nJ,~f , 1995. , BY:,..'/ . VENTURE /L- Signed, sealed and de~iv.red in the presence of: (~p.; j)~dL . y'.. () ,L 0 NnlA ~an~nt"Z'. Printed Name. C>> ~ ~ ~.V~i";- pr1nt~ Name ~'~_._..'''''.- STATE OF FLORIDA ) ) COUNTY OF ) I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, batore ma, an officar duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgements, personally appeared '#owarJ It:. .!'..J.arl/", the ~.J~ ot WOOLBRIGHT PLACZ JOINT VENTURE, known to me to be the person described. in and who exec";,lted the foreqo1ng instrument, who acknowledge before JIG that he .axecuted the same, i. personally known to me and an 04 th wa. llot taken. - .. ..... ... .. ... .' Witne8. my band and 9tricial seal in the county and State last atoresaid this 2f/.. ',' ~ay ot '~AJ,y~~~ , 19..tL::. ~ ):;:,/114.. ~,,"d / NOTARY PUBLXC "( Printed Name My Cammi..ion Expires: , . J....,'...~ _04" WOOL'IT.IIL . . . ~. .. KINIA IANOIIZ NOrMY ftJIUC II'Aft OF JIL,OIIDA COMMI!iIION NO. CC311140 MYCOMMISSIONEXP. L't .,,, THIS II/STILIEJIT PlUMIO " & RlTUlJI TO: JAMES A. tRIM, ISQUII. JOSIAI & GDREM, ',A. 3099 Ease Camerc:t.l IcIuteverd Suit. 200 Fore Lauderdale. 'L 33308 GBHBRAL RBLBASB XNOW ALL MEN BY THESE l'RESENTS: That HOWARD SCHARLIN, first party. tor and in conside,'t'ation of the sum of Tan and NO/lOa ($10.00) DOLLARS, or other valuable considerations, received from or on behalf of THE CITY OF BOY~TON BEACH, second party, receipt whereat is hereby acknowledged. (Wherever used herein the terms "first party" and "second party" shall include sinqular and plural, heirs, legal representative., and assigns of individuals, and the succa..ors and assigns of corporations, wherever the context so adaits or requires). HEREBY remise, r.lflle~s~, aCCJlO:it, satisfy, and toravar discharga I Iw'~~ e,..OAfW-1-~P"II.tt~~""'S4!ofJ'~ ~/"~ bc~c 5eJw.r1t... -,ill e.:~ -t':1.'CA'M- ,. ~ n...,.,,,'. the said aecond party ot and t:-om a1 , and a 1 manner of action and actions, cauae and causes of action, suits, debts, due., sums ot money, accounts, reckoning8, bond., bill., specialties, covanan't., contracts, controversies, agreamen'ta, promiae., variances, tr..~as.a3, damAq.., judgments, executions, claims and demands whatsoever, .La law or in aqui1:y, which said tirst party ever had, now ha., or which any paraona1 r.pre.en~ativ.., successor, heir O~ a_Rign 0:: ~ai~ .t.'irst party, haraafter can, sba11 or may have,. against said second party, tor, upon or by reason or -. any ma~tar, caus. or' thing what3oever, trom the beginning ot the world to the day of these p%'esenta. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this , g#- day ot ;Vf/Vt~~ ,. 2995. signed, ..aled and delivered in the presence of: uf/u~ k~~ )<P//!a. .fQn~~L'l: I _ Printed Name ~ ~0lJ~ EVA~e{ 'lIP- e. VI ~n"1.... Printe Name . . \ ~/ -~l .' HOWARD SCHAR /71 BY: STAT! OF FIDRIDA ) ) COUNTY OF .) I HERBBY CERTIFY tbat on this day, before me, an otticer duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgements, personally appeared HOWARD SCHARLI:N as Q~ , known to me 'to be the person descri1:uad in .,.d Who executed the toregoing instrument, who acknowledge before .. that he executed the same, ia p.r~onal1y known to m. and an oath was not: taken. Wi tn... my hand and otf'iclal seal in the County and State last aforesaid this g~ day of AJI11I~~"~r , 19.fC. . (~/JLkea.4d/ NOTARY PUBLIC 0 Printed Nama My Co_i.8ion Bxpire.: .IAC/&_ 9DCD04 SCHAIL.III.IEL ICINIA SANCHEZ NOI'A&Y PUIUC irATE OF R..ORIDA OOMMIS&ION NO. CC3h140 ; MYCOMM15ISION DP. ULY 4.1", I ITEM 3, PARAGRAPH 2 ATTACHMENTS . t DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTh1ENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 97-369 FROM: Jim Cherof City Attorney . ' . --=- I . (t/ltr-I..., U.f- Tambn J. Heyden, AICP /,(1)..,k'''~'i'l'-''"d :1c;1 Planning and Zoning Director TO: DATE: July IS, 1997 SUBJECT: Mr. Morton's master plan modification for Shoppes of Woolbright peD At Monday (7/14/97) night's meeting with Mr. Morton, Mr. Morton made numerous references to the above application which is in progress and scheduled to go before the Planning and Development Board August 12, 1997. The modified master plan is necessary as a prerequisite to subdividing the land within the PCD to create the separate parcels Mr. Morton desires for Discount Auto and Food Court. However, even if these uses don't materialize, and Mr. Morton withdraws the application, he still needs to complete the process of rectifying the PCD master plan. Such a master plan, that addresses all master plan modification comments approved by the Commission in connection with the five different master plan modification applications processed since 1990, has never been received. Mr. Morton's last attempt at such a plan was not received until 2 Y2 weeks ago (6/24/97). It was Mr. Morton's choice to combine the rectification process master plan with the master plan to subdivide the parcels (and change their access); the latter being the master plan needing Board and Commission approval and needed to release a Discount Auto certificate of occupancy (see bullet five of Vanessa Llera's attached memorandum distributed by Mr. Morton at Monday's meeting). I doubt Discount Auto has pulled out as Mr. Morton claims, since Mr. Morton has not returned their refundable deposit. Be that as it may, Mr. Morton is asking for the items in Vanessa's memorandum to be disconnected from Discount Auto's certificate of occupancy. He further claims that the master plan modification is not needed since Discount Auto has pulled out. However, based on the above concerns, relief from the master plan modification must not also relieve Mr. Morton from rectifying the master plan. This is consistent with the City Manager's statement at the meeting that the city should not allow Mr. Morton to keep putting off obligations. You need to be aware that Mr. Morton is close to achieving a rectified master plan, but there is one issue to which Mr. Morton refuses to agree, and which is holding up the process. This is the ) Page 2 of2 Memorandum No. 97-369 issue with the number of allowed freestanding signs on Woolbright Road. Herewith I am reforwarding to you the documents which staff believes verify that Mr. Morton's request for two freestanding signs was not approved. Despite this he refuses to remove the extra sign from his master plan. Please advise as to whether you disagree with this conclusion. Lastly, you might be interested in knowing that although Mr. Morton stated that Planning and Zoning staff was refusing to process his master plan, the application came in on 4/18/97. It was incomplete. However, in order to work with Mr. Morton, staff started processing it as a first review plan. Mr. Morton missed the revised submittal deadline and did not resubmit until late on 6/24/97, The resubmittal was distributed by memorandwn to the Technical Review Committee within the timeframe allotted by code. Comments were due back yesterday, also within the time frame set forth by code. TJH:dim Attachment Xc: Kerry Willis, City Manager Al Newbold, Acting Development Services Director Mike Haag, Building Code Permit Administrator Jerzy Lewicki, Acting Senior Planner Vanessa Llera, Plans Review Technician J:\SHRDA T A \Planning\SHARED\WP\CORRESP\CITY A TIY\Morton's MPMD Shoppes of Woolbright.doc .,-) t DEVF~ OPMENT SERVICES DEPAl MENT PL.ANNING AND ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 97-176 (Amended) TO: Mike Haag Building Code Permit Administrator FROM: Vanessa Uera Planning and Zoning Department DATE: July 1,1997 RE: Shoppes of Woolbright - Discount Auto (permit # 96-5843) The following is a revised list of the requirements that must be met by Discount Auto prior to receiving a certificate of occupancy as stated by City Commission on 3/4/97, file no. NWSP 96-013: . City Commission has approved plat for Tract "C" of Shoppes of Woolbright. Plat has not been recorded, Development Order of the City Commission dated March 4, 1997, comment # 15. . Installation of remaining landscaping at west buffer of Woolbright Place PUD ( old 8th Street right-of-way between north property line of church parcel and Ocean Avenue) and lake perimeter planting and littoral planting for the Water Management area, are currently in the inspection phase. Development Order of the City Commission dated March 4, 1997, comment # 33. . A copy of cross easement agreements for northern and southern driveways has been submitted, but not the recorded copy. Development Order of the City Commission dated March 4,1997, comment # 16. . Current Master Plan is in the submittal process, has not been presented to P/D Board. Development Order of the City Commission dated March 4. 1997. comment # 34 & 36. . Landscape for Discount Auto has not been submitted for permits. Development Order of the City Commission dated March 4, 1997, comment # 21. The Planning and Zoning Division will keep you informed when the above criterion has been met. VHL : vhl xc: Steve Cooper Jerzy Lewicki Central File ') S:\PLANNING\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\DISCAUTO\MEMO,DOC . \ } '-II' or ./ BOYNTON BEACH ~ i4J 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. P. 0, Box 310 Boynton Beach. florida 33435.0310 1407) 734.8111 OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR August 27, 1990 Mr. Robert Gomez 902 Clint Moore Road, Suite 124 Boca Raton, Fl. 33487 S;; 1t."J .jJ(l.t>U.; r.t:/l"'\ RE: Shoppes of Woolbright - Site Plan Modification (Signs) File No. 527 Dear Mr. Gomez: ") Please be advised that on Tuesday, August 21, 1990, the Ci Commission approved the referenced site plan modification (si~ program), subject to staff comments, copies of which aJ attached, and including the landscape stipulations recommended k the Community Appearance Board (see attached). With respect t the sign variances requested, the City Commission approved onl those variances allowing the Home Depot building signs a presented and one freestandinq sign limited to 30 feet in height 150 square feet in size and the identification of the proJec name Home Depot an wo enan s. Sa SJ. s ra ~ ocate alone] the Wnn1hright oad fronta~!.L with a mJ.nJ.mu setback of 10 feet from any property line so as not to conflic with required landscaping and easements. These plans were approved subj ect to your compliance with th attached stipulations and must now be modified to incorporat same. To initiate your sign-off procedure, please submit two (2 sets of modified plans to the Office of the Site Developmen Division of the Building Department, which will record th required identification markings on each set of the modifie plans. After each set of modified plans has the appropriate markings you should proceed with your sign-off on each set of plans fro: each Technical Review Board member who made comments. The Zonin & Site Development Administrator will provide the Buildin Department sign-off and is the last Technical Review Board membe TO: Mr. Robert Gomez -2- August 27, 1990 to review and sign-off the plans. If the Building Departmeni not have comments that require sign-off, they are still the department to handle and process the plans. One (1) set of t signed-off plans will remain with the Building Department and other set of plans will be returned to you to be retained at job site. To help facilitate the sign-off process, you should make appointment to meet with each Technical Review Board member (, those members who made comments), to allow them sufficient t to review and sign-off the modified plans. After securing the required Technical Review Board member signatures completing processing by the Site Development Division, you apply for building permits by submi tting the appropr i documents and fee to the Plan Review and Permitting Division the Building Department. The Building Department will advise: as to any additional permits which may be required, such as Pc Beach Health Department (water and sewer), clearing/grubbir excavation/fill, drainage, paving, site lighting, landscaping a irrigation. The approval of the City entitles you to construct only t improvements shown on the site plan. The site plan will : viewed procedurally as an as-built or record drawing. If yt have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitat to contact me. Very truly yours, CITY OF BO~EACH 1:: I"GOLDEN Interim planning Director JJG:frb Encs cc: Technical Review Board C:ShofWl ,,) I I I I \ .;K MINUTES - R ~R CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA AUGUST 21, 1990 Mr. Chuck Capella, representative for the owner, noted his company was not responsible for the banners. Once Mr. Capella has the permi~he estimated the sign could prob~bly be fabricated and installed in about three weeks. Scott Blasie, Administrator of Code Enforcement stated the 30 day clock on the violation had started about two weeks ago, so they were looking at another two weeks. The restaurant would be brought before the Code Enforcement Board during the third week 1n September. ' Mr. Jaeger explained the Sign Code does allow temporary signage once they submit for a permit. They could be issued a temporary sign permit to allow the banners. The Mayor thought businesses should be advised of that fact rather than finding out from Code Enforcement. Mr. Jaeger indi- cated they have told them that, however, they have to go through the site plan approval process first before they can ~ubmit for the permit. Once they submit for the permit, they can submit for the temporary signage. It was noted the Community Appearance Board and Planning & Zoning Board had approved the sign. Johnnetta Broomfield, Director of Community Improvement indicated the sign complied with t~e downtown sign guidelines. " , Vice Mayor Wische moved to approve tbe sign. Commissioner Olenik seconded the motion for discusa~on purposes. Cynthia Greenhouse, 618 N.E. 20th Lane, 'Boynton Beach stated banner signs are presently prohibited. She made remarks about the three draped banner signs and statad the restaurant was requesting approval of a sign'~hen they were in violation. Mrs. Greenhou~e thought the reitaurant had "tl1umbed its noseU at the City'since being cited. and she explained. " \ \ \ \ I I i \, I Discussion took place regarding ba ner signs that some ! tenants at the Winn Dixie shopping enter had put up during; recent renovation and the fact that ey had also been cited by Code Enforcement. Mr. Blasie indio,ted all but one \' tenant had removed the banners voluntar~ly. The remaini~g case had been cited. . Mayor Moore called for a vote on the motion. The motion i carried 4-1. Commissioner Weiner voted against the motion..' 5. Project: A.gent: Owner: Shoppes of Woolbright Robert Gomez. Project Manager Tradewinds Development Corp. c/o Howard Scharlin Woolbright Rd. at the L.W.D.D. E-4 Loca t ion: ) 11 t dU......L c.~ - REf BOYNTON BEAC .AR CITY COMMISSION MEETldu FLORIDA AUGUST 21, 1990 Canal, northeast corner SIGN VARIANCE AND SITE PLAN: Request for approval of an amended site plan to allow for .project signage . Jim Golden explained the TRB recommended appro~al of this re~uest with the exception of the sign variance request WhICh had to be addressed by the Commission. When this request went to the Planning & Zoning Board; the Board recommended approval and at that time the developer offered to move the 50' high free-standing sign from the southeast corner of the building to the northeast and reduce the height from SO' to 40'. Description: Vice Mayor Wische reported on the CAB's recommendations. City Manager Miller stated there were two pylon signs, one on the east and one on the west. Staff recommended the east pylon sign, referred to as the "B" sign, (next to 1-95) be eliminated. Mr. Miller stated it was recommended that sign "A" be centrally located somewhere in that vicinity, but kept within the height limitation of 30'. Relative to the other two wall signs, it was recommended that the 720 sq. ft. for the maximum wall signage be allowed and the 150 sq. ft. of signage, with the owner given the discretion of choosing the advertising matter. ~..------ --- -- ....._.~~-_..- '--. -::;.-- (/ Michael Morton, Tradewinds Group, Boca Raton stated they ) were eliminating the SO' pylon sign in its entirety. They were going along with the recommendations of the CAB, TRB, Planning & Zoning Board and Building Dept. and were requesting the rest of the sign variance be approved. He noted everything else they had presented was approved. with the exception of three items. Mr. Miller indicated a 30' pylon sign remained which would need a variance in connection with the square footage which would be 150 sq. ft. In this district, 80 sq. ft. is the maximum. In connection with the Home Depot wall signs on the front and side of the store, a variance was needed to set the maximum sq. ft. at 720 sq. ft. The Ordinance allows 64 sq. ft. Mr. Jaeger noted this is in a PCD and the Ordinance doesn't really address what happens when you have a building of this magnitude. All it allows per tenant is 64 sq. ft. He thought it was really meant to address strip shopping centers, however, in a normal commercial zone they would be allowed 10% of the face of the building which would be 1,300 sq. ft. A variance request was also needed in connection with the multi-use on the remaining free-standing sign. Staff recom- ':_) mended approval of this aspect. 12 M1NUTES - RE AR CITY COMMISSION MEETIN~ BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA AUGUST 21, 1990 In co~nection with the remainlng pylon sign, Mr. Morton explalned the 150 sq. ft. would consist of 72 sq. ft. for the Home Depot portion, 38 sq. ft. for the Shoppes of Woolbright portion and 30 additional sq. ft. for two addi- tional tenants to go on in the future~ Mr. Morton calcu- lated even with the two additional tenants listed, there would Bti~l be 9'6" of clearance from the bottom of the sign to the ground. Discussion took place regarding the ren- dering which was before the Commission and Commissioner Olenik noted the rendering didn't reflect what Mr. Morton was proposing. Mr. Morton indicated that the rendering was not up-to-the-minute as some of the decisions were made after the ~~ meeting which was held the prior evening. \. ..- M-r ~-"Mo-r-ton--r-e!fPonaecrth'e-. 'sTgn cont i-gurat ion- to--be" used' wou Id be a compromise between the 50' sign and the 30' sign. You would have The Home Depot, Shoppes of Woolbright and space for additional tenants below it. Thg~~~ld be one sign ins~;.~~--2; ~o S,~!Hh", ~ehgtny discussion ensii"ea:---r-t-was-- '-'-clarlfied tnat the wall sign on the west and south ~!~Y~~!Qn~~QmbineQ~~uld total the 720 sq. ft. of signage. ~- ---_. ....-- ----.. Motion Regarding Sign Variances ! ----- -----.-- -~ In connection with the sign variances, Vice Mayor Wische moved to approve the recommendations. Commissioner Artis seconded the motion which carried 5-0. ) " Motion Regarding Site Plan Modification Commissioner Olenik moved to approve the site plan modifica- tion for the Shoppes of Woolbright. Vice Mayor Wisch~ seconded the motion which carried 5-0. Mayor Moore called a brief recess at 7:40 P.M. resumed'at 7:50 P.M. L~. - .--,.---- " ordina~~es - 2nd Readin~ubliC Hearing , "'- 1. proposed Qrdinance No. 90-1~ Re: Height Referendum The meeting , ~ I " Ci ty Attorney Ch'&,rof read I caption only: "'- \ "AN ORDINANCE OF i1m CITY COMMISSION I '\ ( BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIQA; SUBMITTING TO R AMENDMENT TO APPENOIX"A, SECTION 4.F.l (HEIGHT LIMITAT~~NS AND EXCEPTIONS); PROVIDING FOR MAXIMUM ~ dinance No. 90~7 b o 13 . ITEM 3, PARAGRAPH 3 ATTACHMENTS . . ~ City of 'Boynton 'Beacli 100 'E. llJognton llJeacft llJoufevara p.o. 1lJ~310 llJoynton llJeac.fi, J'forula 33425-0310 City :JlaU: (561) 375-6000 J'JlX: (561) 375-6090 '" ~- December 9, 1996 Ms. Anna Cottrell, AICP Basehart & Cottrell, Inc. 1532 Old Okeechobee Road, Suite 101 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Re: File No.: Location: Shoppes of Woolbright PCD - Sign Program MSPM 96-005 Southeast and southwest comers of the intersection ofS.W. 8th Street and Woolbright Road Dear Ms. Cottrell, Enclosed is the City of Boynton Beach Development Order regarding Commission approval of your request for major site plan modification. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact this office at (561) 375-6260. Sincerely, .--- !} ,~~://t-,"""L{vu. ".... Tambri J. Heyden, AI Planning and Zoning Director ~'ckv TJH:dar Attachment xc: Central File Michael Morton D:\SHARE\ WP\PROJECTS\SHPSWOOL \MSPM\DEVELORD.WPD Jlmemas (jateway to tIU (julfstream . cZcZ. DEVELOPMENT ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA PlANNING AND lONING DEPT. APPLICANT: Michael Morton, Tradewinds Group APPLICANT'S AGENT: Anna Cotrell. Aoent for the Tradewinds . Inc.. DATE OF HEARING BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: November 19. 1996 TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Maior Site Plan Modification. Reauestina approval to modify the approved sian proaram. In addition to the freestandina sians that have alreadY been approved, additional sianaoe is reauested. more specificallY. new freestandino (monuments) and wall signaae for outparcels and main buildino tenant(s). LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Southeast and southwest corners of the intersection of S.W. 8th Street and Woolbrioht Road. DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO. THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of . Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows: 1 . Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations. 2. The Appli"~.,.( --.ZHAS HAS NOT established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested. 3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth on Exhibit "C" with the notation "Included". 4. The Applicarrt's application for relief is hereby ~GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof. . _ DENIED 5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk. 6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of this order. 7. Other: DATED: November 19,1996 f ! I . ! I / _:~~~J~ /~.0>.<; City lerk t ITEM 3, PARAGRAPH 4 A TT ACHMENTS . . City of Boynton Beach Development Services Department Planning and Zoning Division PO Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425 561/ 375 - 6260 Fax: 561/375 - 6259 FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET Date: 'j/~ I/~i 7 To:: ,/'iJ J:...C f'vbOlJ "I Fax: ~/'I_ -ILoi./ .,':/,(:;{., _J '--'" .;...- I -...."') Re: 34 of,.:'!':) OF aJ.:-:c/.6'.c I~/~I Pc?J - ~:/i:> f:e:r,CW &/>?m,-,drs Sender:x!/ YOU SHOULD RECEIVEB PAGE(S), INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL 561/375 - 6260. <::1'7 - . ( - DOL.j-5 k",", f CVv~ g,. ~O n.., I 1- d.d...l ....... 11-{1,+ 11- 3 bLf- ( Po!,'ce) [XLvin 4{{aJ11Ul ) ( JOhn tv~ 1t1..~) (Lt ft' I ;+i~ s) Z Bld~ i ~'V1~ti~) C r cf2-) POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 97-0045 TO: FROM: TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT ~ JULY 2,1997 SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT PCD-MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION- 2nd REVIEW DATE: RE: I have reviewed the above listed plans. I feel there is traffic flow concern in the area oftbe Home Depot Garden Center. I propose that the 'CUSTOMER PICK-UP ZONE" be shortened and not extend north of the access road to Shoppes of Woolbright. Tbis area is already a traffic problem with customers blocking the area of the intersection. Pick-up and temporary parking for the Garden Center needs further design and consideration, prior to construction of the rest of the shopping center. I recommend a traffic signal be installed at the intersection of the access road and S.W. 8 Street. t . ~. "-~.--- -- ..-- .-. II I' r" _ 1:1) :1 : ~"",,_, .....-0-- RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director Kevin John Hallahan ,Forester / Environmentalist kJII- Shoppes of Woolbright PCD -Master Plan Modification FROM: RE: DATE: June 30, 1997 Recommendation The applicant not be granted the request to substitute the 25 foot wide peripheral greenbelt along the northeast property line of the peD with a 5 foot tall wall within a 10 foot wide landscape buffer along the south side of Purple Heart Way. This peripheral greenbelt requirement is to visually and aesthetically protect the residents of The Vinings from the commercial improvements proposed in the above project location. - --.....-,.------ ., .,,; RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #97-320 RE: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Department Director John Wildner, Parks superintendenr Shoppes of Woolbright TO: FROM: DATE: July 15, 1997 There are no comments to this project. The project should continue in the normal review process. JW:ad . MEMORANDUM Utilities # 97-229 oom mOWI iL: : ...'~ .. - . ... ::1':", ~ PlANNING AND ZONING DEPl TO: Tambri Heyden. Planning & Zon' Date: John A. Guidry, . 'j Director of Utilities L July 15, 1997 FROM: SUBJECT: Shoppes of Woolbright peD, Proposed Master Plan Modifications, Second Review Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: I. Please show existing easements along the east property line, west of the canal easement, (LDR Chapter 3, Art. IV Sec.3 (H and 1). It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. sm! woolpcd2 xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella File . ill 'j; ....v_ . , ,--' . I ....... ~ . "- I..... ~ rn@~uw~ DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 97-174 PlANNING AND ZONING DEPT. TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning FROM: AI Newbold. Deputy Director of Development ~~~ DATE: July 14, 1997 RE: SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT PCD - MASTER PLAN MODIFlCA TION 2ND REVIEW We have reviewed the above rcfercnccd plans and offcr the following comments. Building Division No objection Engineering Division I . Change "outparcel I" to Lot 2, change "outparcel 2" to Lot I and change "outparcel 3" to remainder of Tract "c" to mirror "Woolbright 100" plat document. [Chapter 5, Article V, Section I.e.] 2. Identify the roadway between Burger King and Discount Auto as "Tract A (private)" to mirror "Woolbright I 00" plat document. [Chapter 5, Article V, Section I.C.] 3. Identify and locate the casement between Food Court and Discount Auto as a 27' ingress/egress casement (private). [Chapter 5, Article V, Section I.C.] 4. Correct the dimension along the north property line of Burger King from 165.89 to 165.23 to reflect the plat dimension. 5. Correct the dimension along the west property line of Discount Auto parcel from 167.97 to 167.86 to agree with plat dimension. AN/ck xc: Mike Haag Ken Hall Sebastian Puda C:\My Documents\Shoppes ofWoolbrighl reD, Master Plan Mod. 2nd.doc . DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 97-364 FROM: Tambri J. Heyden, AICP f?d Planning and Zoning Director Jerzy Lewicki, Acting Senior Planner -:J \..- TO: DATE: June 30, 1997 SUBJECT: Shoppes of Woolbright PCD - Master Plan Modification, 2nd review comments File No. MPMD 97-002 Please be advised of the following comments relative to the second review of the modified master plan for the above-referenced project: 1. The site signs shown on the submitted plan do not match the signs shown on the approved sign program. Eliminate from the master plan the site . signs from the following sites: . Cracker Barrel, . Race Trac, . Home Depot. 2. The second free-standing sign on the Home Depot property has not been permitted by the most recent sign program for Shoppes of Woolbright PCD. Eliminate any reference to this sign from the master plan. 3. Modify the first note from the notes section of the master plan to read as follows: "See plan for location and size of minimum required peripheral greenbelt". 4. Amend the chart that identifies previous master plans to reflect the appropriate date the master plan modification was approved by the City Commission. Also, indicate that the approvals are subject to staff comments. t Page 2 Memorandum No. 97-364 Shoppes of Woolbright PCD - Master Plan Modification File No. MPMD 97-002 5. The required time frame for the completion of the Industrial Access Road (aka Mortons Way/Purple Heart Way), which is located within the PUD, is September 7, 1997 and there is not a current application submitted for improvements in the Woolbright Place PUD. Therefore, it is recommended that the applicant make permit application for this road within 30 days of the commission approval of the subject request and complete the road by September 7,1997. 6. Submission of a rectified master plan showing compliance with the conditions of approval for this request will be required to be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department, prior to certificates of occupancy for Discount Auto or Food Court (whichever occurs first). 7. To provide consistency among all submittal elements, amend the request letter to delete the request to change the 25 foot peripheral greenbelt for a 10 foot peripheral greenbelt containing a 5 feet high masonry wall. 8. Correct the master plan to reflect the access between Burger King and Discount Auto as an easement on the Burger King parcel as per the recorded agreement and plat. Central File J:\SHRDATA\PLANNING\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\SHPSWOOL\SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT MOVE NORTH DRIVEWAY- 2ND REVIEW COMMENTS,DOC '. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-539 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Jerzy Lewicki DATE: October 11, 1996 SUBJECT: Major Site Plan Modification - 1 st Review Project: Shoppes of Woolbright PCD (Sign Program) Location: SW 8th Street and Woolbright Road. Agent: Michael Morton File No.: MSPM 96-005 The following is a list of 1 st review comments regarding the modified site plan review of the plans for the above-referenced project. The applicant shall understand that all documents and plans submitted for site plan review are subject to additional comments. I recommend that the applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the comments, If the applicant is not intending to correct code deficiencies, he should contact me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement. 1. Provide a clear identification system correlating the table of contents with the submitted sheets. All cross-references included in the project shall be made in reference to the sheet code as identified in the table of content. 2. On the site plan, sheet 2 of 9, distinguish locations of existing and proposed signs. 3, No business identification (sign copy) was submitted for the monument sign proposed for the northernmost portion of Parcel "C", Provide a note on the master plan that the approval of this sign is limited to location only. A subsequent submittal of the sign copy shall meet the conditions of this sign program approval, otherwise future revised sign program (Major Site Plan Modification) will have to be submitted for review and approval by the City Commission. 4. On sheet 5 of 9, specifications for typical store signs are laid out. Clarify in which locations these typical store signs are to apply. 5, All proposed signs must meet the minimum setback requirements of 10 feet. On the master plan include all required setbacks. Also, provide colored elevation drawings of the signs. No later than one week prior to the Planning and Development Board meeting submit color samples of all materials to be used in manufacturing and constructing the signs, If the new signage exceeds the allowed number of colors (two plus white and black), an application to appeal the number of colors allowed shall be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department no later than October 21, 1996. The sign program cannot violate the code without the proper appeals/variances (it does not override the code). Contact the Planning and Zoning Department regarding the appeal application, fee, and process. 6. City's LDR, Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan allows only two (2) colors, (except for white and black) to be used for signs in shopping centers. On the site plan, sheet 2 of 9 include a tabular summary of all colors proposed for the signage in this development. Mark with an asterisk colors already approved by the City Commission. Page 2 Memorandum No. 96-539 1 st Review - Major Site Plan Modification Shoppes of Woolbright Sign Program MSPM 96-005 7. If colored elevations of all proposed signs, as required by the LDR, Chapter 4, Section D are not submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department one week prior to the Planning and Development Board meeting, it is recommended that the elevations go back before the Commission as a future site plan approval, prior to application for permit. 8. Chapter 9 of the LDR, Community Design Plan, Section 10.1,2 requires that a single sign style shall be used for wall signage on all buildings on the site. Comply with this requirement of the city code or file an application for a Community Design Plan appeal from this code provision. 9. Chapter 9 of the LDR, Community Design Plan, Section 10.1.8 allows only one lettering style, in addition to the lettering styles of the nationally registered copy, to be used by all tenants/outparcel owners in the PCD. Comply with this requirement of the city code or file an application for a Community Design Plan appeal from this code provision. 10. For the Home Depot property, two new pylon signs are proposed along the frontage of Woolbright Road, approximately 220 feet apart. No business identification (sign copy) was submitted for the easternmost sign, Provide a note on the master plan that the approval of this sign is limited to location only. 11, Submit a rectified master plan for the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD showing compliance with the conditions of all previous approvals, prior to the Planning and Development Board meeting, 12. All monument signs shall provide appropriate, unobstructed cross-visibility at all points of access as described in LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.H. JL:dim xc: Central File a:shop-wol.wpd 1 ..: rn w ~. rr , I OCT I 0 1996 ~ DEP ARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-088 PlANNI~!~ .!"') ZONING IJtPT. TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning & Zoning Director Widi4.A. Hukill, P.E. W~f Development FROM: DATE: October 9, 1996 RE: WOOLBRIGHT PLACE PCD - SIGN PROGRAM REVIEW We have reviewed subject documents and find as follows: I. Reference sign locations by dimension to property lines. Chap.2 I, ArtJ, Sec.5B & C, pg.21-2 2. Designate tenants for all ground signs. Chap.21, Art.!, Sec.5K, pg.21-3 3. Provide justification for proposing more than one pylon sign for Home Depot. Chap.21, ArtJV, Sec.3B, pg.21-17 4. Provide justification for proposing additional ground signs on Parcel 3. Chap.2 I, Art.IV, Sec.3G, pg.2 I - 17 5. Walmart and Discount Auto signs are limited to 64 sq. ft. Chap.21, Art.lV, Sec .2B, pg.2 I - 16 6. Reader board for Burger King must be part of ground sign subject to code specified maximum size. Chap.21, ArtJV, Sec.2D, pg.21-16 7. Show colors, lettering types, logos, Chap.9, Sec. 101, pg.9-5 8. RaceTrac wall sign is limited to code specified maximum size. Chap.21, Art.IV, Sec.2C, pg.2 I - 16 WVH/ck xc: Anthony Occhiuzzo, Bldg. Permit Administrator Ken Hall, Eng. Plans Check Inspector attachment: Bldg. Div. Plans C:WOOLSIGN RECREATION & PARK DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-464 ~ ~ @ ~,U WI ~ @) 't, II/" (: ~ i,.~.:: PLANN'~I" ,,~---...J ZONlfJ~:'Dl'NJ1J HI U'T, --.,.,.""..........---...... TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/ Environmentalist 1<2J. # DATE: October 2, 1996 FROM: SUBJECT: Shoppes of Woolbright PCD-Major Site Plan Modification(Sign Program) - 1st review The applicant should comment on any existing trees which may be affected by the placement of signs within the scope of this project. The project should continue in the normal review process, kjh _" ~ eo., ,__ _"-I I ......,-J .,J~~ ..... I ~'J1J1 rn~ rn 0 \VI rn ill lIOI/IIIalS~OI'J OCT I 4 1996 ~ -:....-:: '.~III s.c.ay~ WlIIam G. YllnlaI' .....MantIger d S. WlweiIIlW1 AIlcrnlY PWIY & Scnonf, P.A LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT ~~ October 15, 1301' MiliTARY TRAIL DELRA Y 8EACH, FLORIO'" 33.... Tambri J. Heyden~ AlCP Director Planning and Zoning City of Boynton Beach P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach. FL 33425-0310 Dear Ms. Heyden: Subje~t: Techni~al Review Committee AgeDda The Lake Worth Drainage District offers the following comments regarding the item(s) on the October 15, 1996 meeting agenda: 1. Citrus Glen, PUD - No objection. - 2. Shoppes of Woolbright. POD - No objection. However, a drainage review will be required prior to construction. 3. Boynton Festive Center. No objection. 4. ITV Tower - No objection. S. East Ridge (3rd Review) - Not in L WOO service area. 6. Woolbright Place Plat 2 - Preliminary Review. Would like copy of plat prior to commenting. As always. we thank you fOI being given the vpportlmity to comment. Sincerely. LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT ~~ Chief Inspector SJW trofb c: Ronald L. Crone. P.E.. P.L.S.. Assistant Manager, L WDD Patrick A. Martin. P.E., District Engineer. L WOD Detr.~ BNd1 & BccI Allen 4i8.5:J6G . B4ynbl e.ctI " w.&t Pun e.tI\ 737.~ . FAll (407) 4i6_~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-492 FROM: Carrie Parker, City Manager Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Dept. Chief Field Insp. Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer Sgt. Marlon Harris, Police Department AI Newbold, Building Division William Hukill, Director of Department of Development Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Tambri J. Heyden, AICP, Planning & Zoning Director '79J;J TO: DATE: September 26, 1996 RE: SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES 1 st Review - Major Site Plan Modification (Sign Program) Project Shoppes of Woolbright PCD Location Site located on the north side of Woolbright Road, being bounded on the east by SCL Railroad and on the west by L WDD E-4 Canal. Agent Anna S. Cottrell, Basehart and Cottrell, Inc. File No. MSPM 96-005 Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Site Plan Review approval for this project will be granted by the City Commission. To ensure that the project stays on line with the review time frame, I request that the plans and exhibits be reviewed and formal written comments transmitted to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department no later than 5:00 P.M. on October 15. 1996. If you believe the plans are substantially complete with regards to code compliance and that your outstanding comments and/or recommendations may be addressed at time of permit review rather than requiring the applicant to prepare amended plans for a 2nd submittal indicate in your 1st review written comments that you recommend the project proceed to the Planning and Development Board and City Commission for approval. If you recommend the project move forward for approval with one review, please attach the 1st review plans to your written comments, with the exception of the Development Department which may retain the plans as the control plans for the project. Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval: 1. Use the review standards specified in Part III, Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Section 8 of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments. 2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete based on the submittal requirements identified in Section 7 of the Site Page 2 of 2 Shoppes of Woolbright PCD To: TRC Members Re: Planning & Zoning Memo 96-492 Plan Review Ordinance. However, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the reviewer through the Planning and Zoning Department. 3, Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the documents. 4. Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with other departmental improvements. 5. When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review specified, 6, If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memo, within the time frame stated above, to the Planning and Zoning Director stating that the plans are approved and they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and recommend the project be forwarded through the approval process. All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department for distribution to the applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memo. Jerzy Lewicki will be the Planning and Zoning Department staff member coordinating the 1 st review of the project. The Planning and Zoning Department will send the applicant a cover letter which includes the comment(s) and directions to amend the plans to comply with the comments and the procedures for resubmission, When the Planning and Zoning Department receives the amended plans, they will distribute the plans with a cover memo to all TRC Members for review and approval. T JH:bme Attachment xc: (Memo Only) Jim Ness, Acting Fire Chief Charlie Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director Marshall Gage, Police Chief John Guidry, Utilities Director Central File A: 1 REVRACE.wpd 'l'RAC.......N~ LUG - SI'l'E I:' LAN REV JEW LJUBMI'f'l'AL PRuJl:;C'l' 'l'l'l'LE: ul:;:;)CRIP'l'lON: '1' Y P E : DA'l'E REC' D: SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT peD (SIGN PROGRAM) FILE NO. :MSPM 96-005 NEW SITE PLAN 9/25/96 AMOUNT: MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION kJ::CEIPT NO.: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 'rWELVE (12) SETS SUBMITTED: COLORED ELEVATIONS REC'D: (Plans shall be pre-assembled. The planning & Zoning Dept. will number each sheet of their set. The Plannillg Dept. set will be used to check the remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match.) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * APPLICATION & SUBMITTAL: DATE: ACCEPTED DENIED DATE: DATE OF LET'rER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES: 2nd SUBMIT'I'AL : DATE: ACCEPTED DENIED DATE: DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER: REVIEWER'S NAME: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * # (Label TRC Departments on each set of plans) DATE AND MEMO NUMBER OF MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW. DATE SEN'l': ~RETUkN DATE: 10/11/96 MEMO NUMBER: 96-492 1st REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED ~~~~ . + Parks --y- E'ire =r= Police --->::- MEMO It 1 DATE / '~C" ~.~ /.-!!JJL C/ '1,,):~i3 ~ (;.'1;-.' ~(';;/ 4~'~1I !~/~ () " / ~/ C- PLANS '/ MEMO It 1 DA'l'E 1 "e" 9G.0j{'J 1 fa/a /~ , / I 1_ 'K,.>-8yg /~/-D- / 1- 0(P-%4' 1 IG/A /(!/ I Planning BUilding Engineer Engineer J:"'orester y ~YP~ OF VAR!ANCE(S) DATE OF MEETING: DA'l'E OF LETTJ::R ~ENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS: (Aesthetic Review App., dates of board mtga. ~ checklist sent out w/ comments NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID: DATE 12 COMPLETE SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW: (Must be assembled. Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents) COLORBD ELEVATIONS RBC I D I MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PBRFORM 2nd RBVIEW. DA'l'E SENT: MEMO It: RETURN DATE: 2nd REVIEW RECOMMENDATION/DENIAL PLANS HBHO ., I DATB I"R/U" PLANS HEMO ., / DATE I"R/D" Util. I / Planning I I P.W. / I 8uilding I / Parks / 1 Engineer / / Fire / 1 Engineer 1 1 Police / / Forster / / LETTER TO APPLICANT RBOARDINO TRC APPROVAL/DBNIAL AND LAND DEVBLOPHBNT aXONS PLACSD AT 'l'HS PROPERTY OATS 8BNT/SION8 INSTALLBD: SCHEDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD CC/CRA DA'l'E APPROVAL LE'l'TER SENT: A: 'l'RACKING.:;)1' {I .51. ill PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #96-223 PLANNING AND ZONING OEPT TO: Tambri J. Heyden, AICP Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director \{ THRU: FROM: Larry Quinn, Sanitation Superintendent SUBJ: Major Site Plan Modification - Shoppes of Woolbright PCD DATE: October 4, 1996 The Public Works Department has no problems with the above site plan, The project should proceed to the Planning & Development Board and City Commission for approval. ,7 ~' / / arry Quinn Sanitation Superintendent LQ/cr "--- MEMORANDUM Utilities # 96-321 TO: Tambri Heyden. Planning & Zoni FROM: John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities Date: October 7, 1996 SUBJECT: Shoppes of Woolbright peD, Major Site Plan Modification, Sign Program, First Review Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: Utilities has no comment. It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. sm/woolpcd2 xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella/;-/ File ill OCT 2 5 1996 r"l '"".."'''''" IS i!'1 \ , G li!!l II!)' rn@rn~~l FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-311 TO: Tambri Heyden, Director Planning & Zoning Department FROM: William D. Cavanaugh, FPO I Fire Department A0f. (ka~~'tC DATE: October 25, 1996 RE: Shoppes of Woolbright PCD Woolbright Rd. between SCL Railroad & L WOD E-4 Canal MSPM 96-005 We have no objections at this time. cc: Deputy Chief Ness FPO II Campbell File CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM 'Ii) m & ffi .~ \'f} ffi ~ Ul1 OCT 2 IE ~ TO: T AMBRI HEYDEN PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR DATE: October 1, 1 996 SUBJECT: SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT MAJOR SITE PLAN - SIGN PROGRAM FROM: SGT. MARLON HARRISA~~FERENCES: POLICE DEP AR TMENT '//7/r 0264 ENCLOSURES: I have reviewed the above plans regarding the sign program and have no comments. TR( '0264WPD 1 w ~ f";1 .. i II l " i cr 10196 IW, PlANN1}~': .!.' ") ZONING l.J PT, DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-088 TO: Tambri 1. Heyden Planning & Zoning Director Nlifr/J Hukill, P.E. W~f Development FROM: DATE: October 9, 1996 RE: WOOLBRIGHT PLACE PCD - SIGN PROGRAM REVIEW We have reviewed subject documents and find as follows: 1. Reference sign locations by dimension to property lines. Chap.21, Art.I, Sec.5B & C, pg.21-2 2. Designate tenants for all ground signs. Chap.21, Art.1, Sec.5K, pg.21-3 3. Provide justification for proposing more than one pylon sign for Home Depot. Chap.21, Art.IV, Sec.3B, pg.21-17 4. Provide justification for proposing additional ground signs on Parcel 3. Chap.21, Art.IV, Sec.3G, pg.21-17 5. Walmart and Discount Auto signs are limited to 64 sq. ft. Chap.21, Art.IV, Sec.2B, pg.21-16 6. Reader board for Burger King must be part of ground sign subject to code specified maximum size. Chap.21, Art.IV, Sec.2D, pg.21-16 7. Show colors, lettering types, logos. Chap.9, Sec.1 01, pg.9-5 8. RaceTrac wall sign is limited to code specified maximum size. Chap.21, Art.IV, Sec.2C, pg.21-16 WVH/ck xc: Anthony Occhiuzzo, Bldg. Permit Administrator Ken Hall, Eng, Plans Check Inspector attachment: Bldg. Div. Plans C:WOOLSIGN RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #96-483 ill ~ ~1 ~ ~~" ill FROM: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director John Wildner, Parks SUPerinlzndentr Shoppes of Woolbright - Sign Program TO: RE: DATE: October 17, 1996 The Recreation & Park Division has reviewed the plans for Shoppes of Woolbright - Sign Program. There are no recreation related comments. The project may continue through the normal review process. JW:ad RECREATION & PARK DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-464 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/ Environmentalist 1<~ # DATE: October 2, 1996 SUBJECT: Shoppes of Woolbright PCD-Major Site Plan Modification(Sign Program) - 1st review The applicant should comment on any existing trees which may be affected by the placement of signs within the scope of this project. The project should continue in the normal review process. kjh , 0-1 1 - , 996 4: 45P~~ FPO~1 LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE 561 495 9694 P 1 .... '- rn n \VI rn 00 IOMfdS~ U - Sla1!t1'f w.-r I<tn'nlt Oell I.~IIl ~~ 'MIlaM G. WI".,. .........".., d S. WhMilhen Attorn.~ Perry & SQllone. PA ~.J'IJ'I rn OCT I 4 \996 LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT ~~ October 15, 13081 MILlTARV TRAIL CELRAY BEACH. FLORIOA 33484 Tambri J. Heyden, AlCP Director Planning and Zoning City of Boynton Beach P,O. Box 310 Boynton Beach. FL 33425-0310 Dear Ms. Heyden; Subjeet: T~hni~al Review Committee AgeDda The Lake Worth Drainage District offers the following comments regarding the item(s) on the October 15, 1996 meeting agenda: 1. Citrus Glen, pun - No objection. _ 2. Shoppes ofWoolbrigh~ POD - No objection. However, a drainage review will be required prior to construction. 3. Boynton Festive Center... No objection. 4. ITV Tower - No objection. S. East Ridge (3rd Review) - Not in L WOO service area. 6. Woolbright Place Plat 2 - Preliminary Review. Would like copy of plat prior to commenting. As al",ays. we thank you for being given the opportWlity to comment. Sincerely. LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT ~~ Chief Inspector SJW /mfb c: Ronald L. Crone. P.E.. P.L.S.. Assistant Manager, L WDn Patrick A. Martin. P .E., District Engineer~ L WDD Ceny 8..ch & Bcc:a RIIlDn ....5363 . BoyrlfDl'l SMdl & w..! PaIIll EleaGh 737.383S . FAX (4C1) ~i4 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-539 TO: Tambri J, Heyden Planning and Zoning Director Jerzy Lewicki :J I/-- DATE: October 11, 1996 FROM: SUBJECT: Major Site Plan Modification - 1 st Review Project: Shoppes of Woolbright PCD (Sign Program) Location: SW 8th Street and Woolbright Road. Agent: Michael Morton File No.: MSPM 96-005 The following is a list of 1 st review comments regarding the modified site plan review of the plans for the above-referenced project. The applicant shall understand that all documents and plans submitted for site plan review are subject to additional comments. I recommend that the applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the comments, If the applicant is not intending to correct code deficiencies, he should contact me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement. 1. Provide a clear identification system correlating the table of contents with the submitted sheets. All cross-references included in the project shall be made in reference to the sheet code as identified in the table of content. 2. On the site plan, sheet 2 of 9, distinguish locations of existing and proposed signs. 3. No business identification (sign copy) was submitted for the monument sign proposed for the northernmost portion of Parcel "C". Provide a note on the master plan that the approval of this sign is limited to location only, A subsequent submittal of the sign copy shall meet the conditions of this sign program approval, otherwise future revised sign program (Major Site Plan Modification) will have to be submitted for review and approval by the City Commission. 4. On sheet 5 of 9, specifications for typical store signs are laid out. Clarify in which locations these typical store signs are to apply. 5. All proposed signs must meet the minimum setback requirements of 10 feet. On the master plan include all required setbacks. Also, provide colored elevation drawings of the signs. No later than one week prior to the Planning and Development Board meeting submit color samples of all materials to be used in manufacturing and constructing the signs. If the new signage exceeds the allowed number of colors (two plus white and black), an application to appeal the number of colors allowed shall be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department no later than October 21, 1996, The sign program cannot violate the code without the proper appeals/variances (it does not override the code), Contact the Planning and Zoning Department regarding the appeal application, fee, and process, 6. City's LDR, Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan allows only two (2) colors, (except for white and black) to be used for signs in shopping centers, On the site plan, sheet 2 of 9 include a tabular summary of all colors proposed for the signage in this development. Mark with an asterisk colors already approved by the City Commission. Page 2 Memorandum No. 96-539 1 st Review - Major Site Plan Modification Shoppes of Woolbright Sign Program MSPM 96-005 7. If colored elevations of all proposed signs, as required by the LDR, Chapter 4, Section D are not submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department one week prior to the Planning and Development Board meeting, it is recommended that the elevations go back before the Commission as a future site plan approval, prior to application for permit. 8. Chapter 9 of the LDR, Community Design Plan, Section 10.1.2 requires that a single sign style shall be used for wall signage on all buildings on the site. Comply with this requirement of the city code or file an application for a Community Design Plan appeal from this code provision. 9. Chapter 9 of the LDR, Community Design Plan, Section 10.1.8 allows only one lettering style, in addition to the lettering styles of the nationally registered copy, to be used by all tenants/outparcel owners in the PCD. Comply with this requirement of the city code or file an application for a Community Design Plan appeal from this code provision. 10, For the Home Depot property, two new pylon signs are proposed along the frontage of Woolbright Road, approximately 220 feet apart. No business identification (sign copy) was submitted for the easternmost sign. Provide a note on the master plan that the approval of this sign is limited to location only, 11. Submit a rectified master plan for the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD showing compliance with the conditions of all previous approvals, prior to the Planning and Development Board meeting. 12. All monument signs shall provide appropriate, unobstructed cross-visibility at all points of access as described in LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H. JL:dim xc: Central File a:shop-wol.wpd , EXHIBIT "e" Conditions of Approval Project name: Shoppes of Woolbright PCD File number: COPA 96-003 Reference: Community Design Plan appeal - number of colors for siQnage I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT ! PUBLIC WORKS Comments: None UTILITIES Comments: None FIRE Comments: None , I POLICE Comments: None - ENGINEERING DIVISION " Comments: None BUILDING DIVISION Comments: None PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: None FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: None PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 1. Delete the color green. ~ 2. Replace the color grey with white. ../ 3. Choose between dark blue and royal blue, If dark blue is chosen. change the / royal blue on the existing pylon sign. I 4.! Change the color yellow to a yellow shade of orange. /' '-"" ~ 5, Change the RaceTrac dark blue to black. 14 Remove yellow from the RaceTrac sign and replace with white, which is one / of RaceTrac's colors, -=- / 7, Remove the roval blue from the existina Dvlon sian on Woolbriaht Road. ~ pe~- v1,{ {I +tIY +- l/U,A_{ \Jj CU 1--( ~ . ~~~ M · L" ~ . . ~~ l' _ ,-.fJ~f-~ ) .;fr':.1 r / jrd~~ -- ~