AGENDA DOCUMENTS
AGENDA DOCUMENTS
<2:-
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOVNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
September 4, 1996
to fix his property. Mayor Taylor advised that he did not have an answer to that question,
but pointed out that Mr. Oldaker must maintain his property.
James Miriana said he was present to voice his displeasure at expenditure items on the
agenda. There are many needy items in the City, but we do not have funds available.
With the City fighting for revitalization of the downtown, Mr. Miriana does not feel it is right
to put a City Hall in the Mall. He believes this will take people away from downtown. When
this item was proposed, there was no mention of the amount of money this would cost. Mr.
Miriana has estimated the first year's costs to run this office will be $100,000. Mr. Miriana
does not feel there is a need for a second City Hall. The City always has money for other
things, but when the people want things that are necessary, no funds are available. Mr.
Miriana feels the needy must be considered first.
Mayor Taylor advised that it is the City's job to provide services to its citizens. Using Mr.
Miriana's logic, we would only have one park in downtown and have buses that only come
to the downtown. City Hall in the Mall is for the convenience of the citizens. He does not
see this service as a waste of money. The City feels it can provide better service to the
community with a City Hall in the Mall.
Woolbright Place PUD
Michael Morton
Howard Scharlin
East side of SW 8th Street and approximately 2,250
feet north of Woolbright Road
MASTER PLAN MODI FICA nON - Request to modify
the previously-approved master plan for the Woolbright
Place PUD. Requested modifications are limited to that
portion of the PUD that is entitled Pod 1. Pod 1 is a
14.05 acre parcel.
Attorney Cherof administered the oath to all who would be testifying in this proceeding. He
advised the Commissioners to disclose any conversations they may have had with anyone
related to this case.
VIII. DEVELOPMENT PLANS:
1.
Project Name:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Description:
Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz disclosed that she had conversations with members of the Boynton
Lakes Estates community relative to this project.
Commissioner Tillman disclosed conversations with Lisa Kramer.
Commissioner Bradley disclosed conversations with Lisa Waters and Gary Lehnertz.
12
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
September 4, 1996
Commissioner Titcomb disclosed conversations with Boynton Lakes Estates' residents.
Due to the number of conditions associated with this application, Attorney Cherof
requested that the applicant indicate the conditions that were not acceptable so that the
balance of the conditions could be accepted at the end of the proceeding.
Michael Morton. 902 Clintmore Road. Boca Raton. Florida. is the agent for the
applicant. This plan will change the 14 acres which are part of the PUD from the originally-
planned multi-family project to a single-family designation. The applicant wishes to affirm
that the change to the master plan is a non-substantial change. This will enable the
applicant to go to the Planning and Development Board next Tuesday for review of the site
plan. He requested a consensus from the Commission relative to the items on the site
plan.
Mr. Morton advised that the applicant is in agreement with all items with the exception of
12,25,27,34,40,41,42,44,54,55,57,58,59,andGO.
Mr. Morton explained that the applicant changed this plan in order to address the needs
of the residents of Lake Boynton Estates. This plan now reflects the 25' buffer along the
north property line, and has taken into consideration the Gary Lehnertz landscape plan by
using all of the plant material specified. The applicant has enhanced that plan by including
additional material. The recreation area was moved to the center part of the project.
Moving this area addresses a concern expressed by Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz.
Comment #12
Previously, the largest concern appeared to the 40' street right-of-way. At the
Commission's suggestion, the applicant added sidewalks on both sides of the 40' street
right-of-way. The applicant hopes the Commission will find this compromise in compliance.
Consensus
There was a consensus of the Commission to allow the 40' wide street width.
Comment #25
In order to make projects viable, applicants try to keep as many lots as possible. In two
locations, there are dead-end streets. There were originally three of these locations, but
the plan was reworked and that number was reduced to two. By taking the advice of staff,
the applicant included a cul-de-sac in the most favorable area, and kept the dead-end
streets in the location where too many lots would be lost. This item affects a number of
other conditions having to do with road frontage. Mr. Morton advised that the two dead-
13
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
September 4, 1996
end streets were not objectionable to the Fire, Police or Public Works Departments.
Mike Haag, Planning Administrator for the Planning and Zoning Department, stated that
staff believes the two dead-ends are not conducive to a street layout in a PUD or a regular
conventional development. Staff feels the dead-ends should be omitted by making some
radiuses, including pie-shaped lots, or omitting some lots from the area. Dead-end streets
are prohibited by our Code (Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 10T). The only way to get relief
from a Code section is to request a waiver of the plat requirement.
City Manager Parker asked staff if we are requesting cul~de-sacs at both dead-ends, or
some sort of turn-around ability. Mr. Haag said staff wants the developer to omit the dead-
ends by making a radius and having pie-shaped lots. Another recommendation would be
to omit the lots to avoid dead-ends.
In response to City Manager Parker's question, Mr. Haag advised that the applicant would
lose approximately two lots by complying with staff's recommendations.
Mr. Morton said he was not sure that number was correct; however, he pointed out that if
the Fire, Police and Public Works Departments are not opposed, and there is no public
safety issue, it would be a compromise to allow the applicant to get the maximum number
of lots to accommodate the changes they have already made.
William Hukill, Director of Development and City Engineer, said this is a violation of the
Land Development Regulations that we have not allowed in other developments. He
pointed out on the map how this situation was corrected in one area by creating a radius
and pie-shaped lots without any significant loss of lots. This is poor planning and the Land
Development Regulations do not permit this condition.
Mayor Taylor asked if the pie-shaped lots would put the point of the lot at the intersection.
Mr. Haag responded affirmatively and explained that the radius would form the pie-shaped
lots that have a narrower frontage than the required 40'. The Zoning Code has regulations
that would cover that situation. The frontage of the lot is measured at the building setback
line rather than at the street frontage.
Mayor Taylor asked the applicant to move on to the next issue at this point. The
Commission will return to this issue later in the meeting.
Comment #27
Mr. Morton advised that this comment deals with the irrigated landscaping plans in the
S.W. 8th Street right-of-way which covers the medians and the swales. The only place
where landscaping has been installed at this point is in the one median that runs from
Woolbright Road up S.W. 8th Street in front of Cracker Barrel. There are two medians
14
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
September 4, 1996
north of that location that have not been landscaped. The underground irrigation sleeves
are in for these two islands.
Mr. Morton objects to this item at this time because of the timing involved. He would like
to get approval from the Commission and the Planning and Development Board, and then
move onto plat approval, full engineering plans and building permits. The applicant does
not know at this point what the final configuration of those two islands will be. If a major
retailer is brought in on the 14-acre parcel, most likely, the median will be altered
significantly. It does not make sense to put a plat requirement on installation of landscape
material that might be removed. He requested that the timing of this item be changed so
that at some point in the future (perhaps after a certain number of homes receive COs) the
applicant would be required to install the landscaping material. This will provide the
opportunity to be able to work with the commercial developer and get the final design
relative to the medians.
Mr. Hukill reminded the Commissioners that this was done in the past with this developer
on a number of occasions. The most recent case involves RaceTrac where there was an
area that was not completed between RaceTrac and Leisureville. There is a similar
situation in a project close to this one where the installation of landscaping keeps being
delayed. This is the obligation of this developer, and he has acknowledged that.
Mr. Hukill explained that the City does not know that anyone will ever develop that property.
This development has been before the City for close to a decade, and we are still waiting
with this as an eyesore. The material needs to be put in now. Staff recommends strongly
that this work be done.
City Manager Parker added that the City has held other developers to this requirement.
When Quantum came before the Commission, they were required to put in the landscaping
first. Quantum made the same comments at the time that they would have to change the
median cuts in the future. The City Commission told them they would then have to change
the landscaping at that time. If the property sits vacant for any length. of time, at least the
medians are landscaped.
Mr. Morton advised that RaceTrac bought the parcel approximately three years ago. They
came through the City with their site plan, building plans and landscape plans. The
obligation to do all of the landscaping including the berm along the canal is RaceTrac's
obligation. RaceTrac has not performed and Mr. Morton discussed this situation before
the City Commission. He guaranteed that RaceTrac would comply. They have still not
fulfilled their obligation. Cracker Barrel is complying and agreed to landscape the berm
along the canal.
With regard to the medians, they do not come up to these 14 acres. The medians exist
at the Trammel-Crowe property. Mr. Morton is not trying to push this item off. He is under
15
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
September 4, 1996
an agreed situation to install the landscape material around the lake. By agreement and
Resolution and license with Leisureville, he was asked to delay that installation. He has
now installed the berm which has been hydroseeded. The hedges are installed and the
trees along SW 8th Street were put into the lake area as per the agreement. Mr. Morton
agrees to install the landscape material in the medians, but those medians are part of
Trammel-Crowe's approval and part of the commercial property.
Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz confirmed that Mr. Morton complied with installing the hedges;
however, she is concerned about the maintenance on those items. Mr. Morton agreed with
her observations. He stated there is a maintenance association between this applicant,
Trammel-Crowe and the church. The maintenance association is run by Trammel-Crowe
because they are on-site. The contractor they hired to maintain the property has been
terminated for lack of service. Mr. Morton put in a bubbler system because of his concern
about the trees not surviving. The trees that have not survived will be replaced.
Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz feels the attractiveness of the medians will be an incentive for
people to purchase homes in this area. Mr. Morton is not opposed to landscaping the
medians. He is only opposed to making it a condition of plat approval. He was hoping to
have plat approval within 45 days. He cannot get the landscaping installed within 45 days,
and he does not want it to hold up the plat. He would prefer to tie the timing to the CO of
the first unit. Even if the median is changed, Mr. Morton will be happy to have installed it
and have to remove it and reinstall it.
Mr. Haag advised that he and Mr. Hukill have objections to tying this to first CO. Planning
and Zoning Department Comment #73 asks for the landscaping to be done 90 days after
approval by the Planning and Development Board so that if the development does not go
forward, the medians will still be completed.
City Manager Parker said this property has been unsightly. To delay the landscaping even
further is not appropriate for the surrounding communities. The road now goes through
from Woolbright Road to Boynton Beach Boulevard. This is a heavily-used roadway and
the City is receiving calls from people who want the medians to be landscaped and
maintained.
Mr. Hukill advised that the City has two examples of plats where landscaping did not go in.
One of them was Boynton Lakes Plat 5, and the other is Cedar Ridge. Cedar Ridge was
a hazard for the City and there were a lot of policing problems at that site. Both projects
proceeded to plat and beyond, and were well through the required improvements. In both
cases, there were dust problems and blowing sand. Mr. Hukill does not support waiting
until first CO. He feels this landscaping should be required with plat approval.
Mr. Morton said the applicant still has several parcels that will be coming into the City for
approvals. Burger King is on the TRC agenda for next Tuesday. Discount Auto is also
16
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
September 4, 1996
coming in. He feels there are still opportunities for the City to require the applicant to
comply in the future. He does not want to delay Kennedy Homes, and that is the reason
for his request at this time. For the record, Mr. Morton said, "we will do our best to get this
thing started, and if I don't keep my word, you'll get me the next time I stand up here".
Mayor Taylor feels the median improvements provide a better opportunity of attracting
people into the complex. One of the first things the City does when bringing in prospective
tenants for Quantum Park is to point out how beautiful the park looks. Mayor Taylor feels
the development will look much better with the landscaping. He feels a great deal can be
done to the medians in 45 days.
Mr. Morton inquired if he could begin installation while he is going through plat approval.
Mayor Taylor feels the Commission has been clear about what it wants to see done with
these medians. He feels the area will look better, and a lot of problems will be solved if the
medians are landscaped.
Comment #34
Mr. Morton advised that this comment deals with the dead-end lots.
Comment #41
To make this plan work, the developer made seven lots 42' wide by 95' deep. The
remainder of the lots are a minimum of 100' deep. The applicant is requesting permission
to reduce certain lots by a half foot so that the lots will be 99.5' deep and 95.5' deep.
Mayor Taylor reminded Mr. Morton that the City went through this on another project and
Commissioner Bradley was opposed to a reduction to 4,000 square feet. When the
decision was made by the Commission to allow that, they also determined 4,000 square
feet would be the minimum, and we would try not to go that low again in the future.
Mr. Morton agreed to make the switch to 99.5' and 95.5'.
Comment #42
This comment also relates to the lots in the dead-end areas.
Comment #44
This comment relates to landscaping and the lake plantings. As per the agreement, and
the license agreement with Leisureville, the applicant has installed all of the material.
There are maintenance concerns and trees that have not survived. Those trees will be
17
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
September 4, 1996
replaced. Trammel-Crowe assured Mr. Morton today that the maintenance contractor has
been replaced on the site. Mr. Morton believes the agreement supersedes Comment #44.
Mr. Haag said he does not know if that statement is true. The Commission would have to
confirm that. Mr. Haag did not know if the Commission was aware of the approved plan
for that area. Mr. Morton is saying that when the Commission approved the Resolution
with the berm and hedge along the east side of Leisureville, it replaced the plan that was
approved in 1990.
Mr. Morton said those approvals did replace the 1990 plan because the planting on the
berm in Leisureville was different from what was asked to be put in the berm. That entire
plan was changed, and has been installed as per an agreement that required the berm to
be installed with a hedge. That changed the 1990 landscape plan dramatically. The
applicant is in compliance with everything they agreed to on the new plan.
City Manager Parker stated that the only issue involved is one of paperwork and tracking.
This project has numerous things associated with it. The City is requesting that the
paperwork that has been submitted with the master plan reflects the previous approvals
so that the documents are all consistent at this time. The City does not have an argument
with approval or non-approval. We want the master plan revised to reflect the approvals
so that we only have to go to the latest document to get all of the necessary information.
We want all records to be up-to-date as the applicant goes forward.
Mayor Taylor recalls meeting with the residents of this area regarding the berm. The
residents had different opinions on what they wanted to see in the berm. A compromise
was reached which included a berm and hedge.
Mr. Morton said he would be happy to work with staff in making any changes on the master
plan to provide a trail.
In response to Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz' question, Mr. Morton advised that the issue with
RaceTrac is that they were sold the property to the canal right-of-way. The responsibility
for RaceTrac doing the berm went along with the sale of the property. Mr. Morton agreed
to comply with Comment #44.
Mr. Haag asked for further clarification. Using the overlay, he pointed out the area involved
with the berm and landscaping associated with the Resolution. It excluded the church. Mr.
Morton is saying that the Resolution that involves the berm and the hedge replaces the
1990 plan that shows landscaping around the lake, the preserve area, and landscaping in
the right-of-way.
Mr. Morton disagreed. He said the applicant took the 1990 plan and put in the berm and
the hedge. He put in the trees (including a combination of Oak trees and Palms) along SW
18
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
September 4, 1996
8th Street, and hydroseeded the lake banks. The only exception to the 1990 plan is the
littoral zones along the lake bank. This was a requirement of South Florida Water
Management which has since been eliminated in drainage areas. This plan was submitted
to the City, and some changes are still required. Utilities had a comment about not putting
Oak trees in the utility easement. Those trees were moved out of that area.
City Manager Parker asked Mr. Morton if he was saying that whatever is allowed by the
other agencies to be permitted around the lake planting zone and the preserve area he still
intends to plant in accordance with the previous plan that the agreement specifically
addressed with the buffer zone. Mr. Morton said this was not his understanding. His
understanding was that when they changed the entirety of the lake area, the plan was
different than what was originally shown for the area. Mr. Morton said the applicant put in
the trees, but eliminated the littoral zoning plantings because they are no longer required
by South Florida Water Management.
City Manager Parker advised that they are still required by the City by virtue of approval
of the plan. There was never any intent to change the landscape provisions of this plan.
Mr. Morton feels that by sitting down with Leisureville representatives and discussing the
changes to the plan, they changed the tenor of what was being installed in that lake. What
was planted is allowable and acceptable.
Attorney Cherof advised that this is not an issue the Commission needs to micromanage.
Condition #44 will be included in the adoption. The documentation will have to fall into
place, and this will be resolved at an administrative level. The Commission does not have
to try to interpret documents that are not before the Commission.
Comment #46
Mr. Morton advised that the same thing applies to Comment #46 which is a housekeeping
item among the City Attorney, Planning, Engineering and the applicant which involves the
north property line of Cracker Barrel and the south property line of the church parcel.
City Manager Parker advised that the reason this appears now is because it has been
discussed many times, and the situation still is not corrected. Staff felt that the situation
might be corrected if it is a condition of plat approval.
Mr. Morton said this is not the applicant's issue. He has a corrected property line which is
the north property line of Cracker Barrel. The problem involves the fact that in 1990, when
the plat came in and the development orders were written, there was a scrivener's error.
Mr. Morton said he cannot do anything about this. This is a situation which must be
worked out with the City Attorney and staff, and Mr. Morton will assist.
Attorney Cherof again advised that Comment #46 will be included and this issue will be
19
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
September 4, 1996
resolved one way or another.
Mr. Morton objected to this as a condition of approval.
Comment #54
Mr. Morton advised that Comment #54 is not a problem. The applicant will extend the wall
around that portion of the lots or install a fence with specific landscaping for buffering.
Mr. Haag asked if this will be common ground or part of the lot. Mr. Morton said he will be
submitting a site plan for the entrance feature. The most likely probability is that they will
run a fence. He is not certain if it will be common ground or part of the lot. .
Mr. Haag advised that staff will accept it either way, but the comment says common
ground.
Comment #55
Mr. Morton said the applicant will take this comment into consideration when he submits
a site plan for the pool area.
Comments #57 and #58
Both of these comments deal with the plant material and what makes up the buffer
between Lake Boynton Estates and this property. On Comment #57, staff took Gary
Lehnertz' plan and used the plant material shown on that plan (the same plant material
shown on the applicant's plan at this time), and made comments that define the trees,
hedges, and shrubs.
In discussions with Mr. Haag this morning, there was agreement that there are two
problems. The applicant agreed with Mr. Lehnertz' plan and tried to locate the material so
that it is acceptable with the FPL guidelines for planting materials in or near their easement
areas. FPL provides a brochure which lists recommendations on where to plant trees.
There is a minor line that runs behind these houses. The applicant has tried to keep some
of the canopy trees as far away from the power lines as possible. These are the trees
recommended by Gary Lehnertz.
Comment #58 then says that if the applicant follows FPL's guidelines, there will be a
problem with some of the trees. In discussions with FPL, they do not have a great
concern. They would prefer the use of smaller trees, but the applicant has complied with
the Lehnertz plan.
Another issue between Comments #57 and #58 involves timing. The City wants the entire
20
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
September 4, 1996
buffer installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of any recreation
structure, sales model facility, or residential unit, whichever comes first. This is a timing
issue because a sales model will be put up while land development work is being done.
It does not make sense to install a berm at that time. It would be better to install this berm
commensurate with the first CO for a residential unit on the property.
Mr. Haag advised that the biggest issue staff has with both the approved plan and the
proposed plan is the overhead power lines. Mr. Morton has enhanced the plan by adding
material to it; however, there are still large canopy trees within 6' of the FPL easement. On
the Gary Lehnertz plan, the north row of trees, which are about 50' on center along the
entire buffer, are right on the easement. The location of the trees is staff's concern. Mr.
Haag does not believe it is wise to plant large canopy trees underneath power lines.
Mr. Morton pointed out that the Gary Lehnertz plan has the trees underneath the power
lines. His plan moved the trees 6' to 1 A' south of the power lines. If staff wants to change
the species on the plan, when the applicant comes in for site plan approval for the berm,
those discussions can take place.
Mr. Haag recommends changing the species to one that can be planted either with the
Lehnertz plan or the proposed plan. Mr. Morton has agreed to plant a smaller tree. If that
happens, the City would want to increase the number of trees.
City Manager Parker feels the neighbors would want the canopy trees as opposed to
smaller trees even though there may be more of them.
Commissioner Bradley pointed out that 6' to 10' is not going to make much difference in
five years when the trees are mature. FPL will have the same problem cutting those trees
at that time.
Mayor Taylor recommends staying with the original plan, moving them 6'. He does not
have a problem with them not being in place when the sales office goes up, but he does
have a problem waiting until the first CO. Mayor Taylor felt the installation of the trees
would be a good marketing tool.
Mr. Morton explained that the builder and developer must make the decisions relative to
marketing. If they feel it is necessary to put in the landscaping berm sooner because of
marketing, then at least it will be their decision. During land development, the workers will
take home some of the trees, or ride the bulldozer up on the berm. This creates
unnecessary problems. The sales activity on the site at that time is confined to the sales
area because the remainder of the site is full of activity for sewer, water, paving, and
drainage. A visual berm is not effective at that time. Mr. Morton added that the berm is
already in. The landscaping needs to be added. Mr. Morton explained that the irrigation
has been vandalized. Mr. Morton advised that this buffer is Kennedy Homes' responsibility.
21
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
September 4, 1996
Comment #63
Mr. Morton said the applicant included sidewalks on both sides of the street in the entire
community with the exception of the three lots inside the cul-de-sac in the northwest
corner. The applicant would prefer not to put the sidewalk in that area.
Comment #72
With regard to the undisturbed area (which appears in Comment #72 and in other
comments) the applicant does not object to Kevin Hallahan's recommendation to remove
the exotic vegetation to his satisfaction, and if other material is needed in the area, the
applicant will plant it. (This appears under Comment #31.) The applicant is not running
the berm around the perimeter because it is a buffer of 80' at some points. They are
proposing to end the berm at the lots that are to the west of the cul-de-sac (Lot 7), and
leave the undisturbed area totally undisturbed.
City Manager Parker read Comment #31, and pointed out that it does not say this is a
recommendation. The comment explains that staff can only evaluate the site after the
exotic vegetation is removed. Mr. Hallahan is reserving comment on this until he sees
what the site looks like after the exotics have been removed.
Mr. Morton said he agrees with that comment. Once the exotics are removed, if Mr.
Hallahan wants additional material planted, the applicant will plant that material. Mr.
Morton does not want to put in a berm in addition to what Comment #31 already requires.
The applicant will comply with exactly what Mr. Hallahan recommends.
Mr. Haag clarified that the approved master plan did not show a lot layout, but does show
the berm continuing all of the way over to SW 8th Street. Staff's pOSition is that there is
a requirement for a berm.
Mayor Taylor confirmed with Mr. Morton that his intention is not to include a berm in the
portion of the undisturbed area if Mr. Hallahan determines that the vegetation is adequate
after the exotics are removed. .
City Manager Parker asked Mr. Morton what his plan includes if Mr. Hallahan determines
that a berm is needed around the entire perimeter as shown on the plan today. Mr. Morton
does not believe that will happen. However, if additional trees are needed to keep the
buffer strong, that will be done. Mr. Morton does not want to be required to put the buffer
in. He would prefer to leave that decision to Kevin Hallahan at a later date.
Commissioner Bradley confirmed with Mr. Morton that if Mr. Hallahan decides Mr. Marton
needs to put in the buffer, he agrees to do it because he trusts Mr. Hallahan's judgment.
22
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
September 4, 1996
Comment #70
A 25' height limitation was established on two-story houses. Because of modern
architecture, some two-story houses are taller than 25'. The applicant is requesting a 30'
height limit to allow for the ceiling heights on the first and second to be 12' and then have
a roof elevation that will be approximately 6' above that.
Mayor Taylor did not object to this request.
The Commissioners confirmed their agreement to change Comment #12 to read,
"Minimum street right-of-way width for a local street with 2 mountable curbs is 40
feet; with swales minimum right-of-way width is 60 feet. Chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. 10C,
pg. 6-11 ".
Carol Fretwell. 713 SW 3 Avenue. said that with regard to Comment #73, other
developers have been made to conform in advance, and this developer should also be
made to do so. Ms. Fretwell feels that Mr. Morton's approach is that he is entitled to do
everything within 45 days. He uses the term "better served", but she wonders who is being
better served. This property has been in disrepair for over ten years. Mr. Morton makes
promises for other owners' properties, but then comes back and says he cannot make
these owners do what he promised they would do. She sees an image of "smoke and
mirrors" and feels Mr. Morton is a magician. He brings projects forward for City
Commission consideration, and then he stands at the podium and offers to consider things
he is supposed to do. Ms. Fretwell would like to see this project go through so that it is
developed and this issue is closed; however, there are reasons for each of these steps.
Mayor Taylor assured Ms. Fretwell that the City Commission knows which department is
placing conditions on the developer. When a developer brings in a project, he presents
his viewpoint. Doing the landscaping later in the development process saves money. It
is up to the City to decide whether or not to allow that. This is a right that the developers
have. There are over 70 conditions placed on this developer. He has agreed to almost
all of those conditions. The City Commission has to make sure that the interests of the
City are being preserved. The developer is trying to make sure his interests are being
preserved. Mr. Morton has lived up to his promises with regard to RaceTrac and Cracker
Barrel. Mayor Taylor feels Mr. Morton has dealt with him in a fair manner up to this point.
Mr. Morton reminded the Commissioners that he has agreed that RaceTrac will comply or
he will comply.
Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz confirmed with Mr. Morton that Comment #74 is acceptable.
Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz asked Mr. Morton to comment with regard to Tambri Heyden's
suggestion about pie-shaped lots. Mr. Morton stated that the developer would lose three
23
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
September 4, 1996
or four lots to go to radiuses.
Rick Wohlfarth, CCL Consultants, said there are two very important points. If the radius
is brought around, Lot 43 and Lot 21 are very close to the roadways. What the developer
is really dealing with is a driveway that is servicing one lot. It is an extension of a driveway.
From a planning perspective, Lots 44 and 22 will be the most desirable and will sell the
quickest. If you provide an eyebrow, each lot below must be narrowed. That will result in
the loss of two lots. To widen the pie to allow 20' setbacks, the developer will lose three
to four lots.
The developer tried to provide a plan that was satisfactory to the neighbors. This is an
acceptable alternative. If the developer accepts the recommendation, he will lose three
or four lots.
Mayor Taylor feels that although the developer might lose a lot or two, the lot remaining
would be much larger and could be sold at a higher price because it would be an ideal
place to buy. Mayor Taylor does not want to set a precedent of doing dead-end lots. He
would rather see the eyebrow. Commissioner Bradley agreed with the Mayor's remarks.
Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz would not support setting a precedent because it will carryover to
other developments.
Mr. Morton agreed to go along with this suggestion as long as there is a compromise in that
the minimum radius size for the front be reduced 20'. The house will be set back in the
right spot, but the developer would be able to get more lots in by having a smaller radius.
They would eliminate the dead-end to do that. A couple of lots will be eliminated, but the
number will not be four.
Mr. Haag said it should be 31.5' at the building line and 15' back. This would follow the
regulations in the Code.
Mr. Morton said he will try to redesign it and work with staff.
Mayor Taylor agreed to leave this comment in and let staff work it out.
Comment #2.7
Commissioner Bradley feels the Mayor's comments were correct in this regard. Marketing
this entire area would be enhanced by completion of these medians because it will benefit
the look overall.
Comment #54
No objection
24
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
September 4, 1996
Comments #57 and 58
Mayor Taylor reminded everyone that there was a consensus of the Commission to go with
the 6' and use the larger trees.
Attorney Cherof advised that Comment #57 will be included, and Comment #58 will be
rejected.
Mr. Morton stated that the physical earth berm is already installed. Kennedy Homes will
be coming in with the plat, site plan for the recreation area, and site plan for the plantings
on the berm, the entrance, the card gate, and other different things. They will include their
building plans for permits. Kennedy will not close on the property and move forward until
they are assured the plat is approved. Under the contract, Kennedy has the responsibility
of installing the planting material on this berm. They have agreed to do that, but will not
do it until they close on the property. Mr. Morton would like a trigger attached to this so
that Kennedy Homes will install the plant material prior to issuance of the first CO on the
first house. Since this suggestion was not acceptable to the Commissioners, Mr. Morton
suggested that the trigger be when the sewer and water are accepted.
Mr. Hukill explained that if the City Commission accepts installation at first CO, it will be
nine months or more before the planting is done. If we wait until water and sewer is
approved, the planting will come in with final approval of the required improvements which
do not begin until the plat is recorded. Therefore, the time line is still the same. If the
business problem is that the buyer will not buy until the plat is recorded or approved, then
the thing to do is place a time limit on it and not issue any permits, except the development
permit, until the installation is complete.
Bruck Minik. 718 SW 4 Avenue. agrees with Mr. Hukill's remarks. He does not feel the
residents or the City should have to wait nine months for this landscape barrier. During
construction, the residents will be exposed to the noise and dirt from that project. He
further pointed out that no one is maintaining the buffer zone at this point. The grass and
weeds have not been cut for a year. He asked for clarification regarding the setbacks of
the homes on the northern boundary of this project, and asked what will be put in place on
the northwest corner of the project at the cul-de-sac.
Mr. Morton advised that the setbacks will be 40', and the area in question is part of the
undisturbed area. Mr. Morton agreed with Mr. Hukill's suggestion to place a time limit on
the installation of the landscape material. He recommends a 180 day time limit. Mr. Hukill
disagreed with 180 days because that would still result in nine months before this planting
is done. Mr. Hukill recommended that the Commission require the planting to begin
immediately following plat approval.
Commissioner Bradley recommended requiring the planting to completed 90 days after plat
25
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
September 4, 1996
approval.
Marv Fornataro. 718 SW 4 Avenue. said she received the notification of this meeting
yesterday, and the notice said the application would be addressed by the Commission on
September 3, 1996 rather than today. She explained that this is the fourth of fifth meeting
the residents have attended on this same subject. She felt the residents made their wishes
clear. The buffer behind her home is a pile of sand. She has complained about this area
because it has not been mowed in at least a year. She requested that maintenance begin
in this area.
Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz explained to Ms. Fornataro that she received many calls from the
residents who have concurred with the basic plan.
Mr. Morton assured Mayor Taylor that Trammel-Crowe is hiring a new maintenance
contractor.
Mayor Taylor advised Ms. Fornataro that the City Commission has addressed the concerns
of the residents with conditions regarding the buffer and landscaping, recreation, and the
sidewalks. Mayor Taylor is confident with what the Commission has done up to this point.
The Commission has now decided that the landscaping is to be completed 90 days from
plat approval.
Attorney Cherof advised that the Planning and Development Board meeting at 7:00 p.m.,
on Tuesday, September 10, will address this application. The public can comment at that
time.
Consensus
There was a consensus of the Commission to allow the 30' height for the two-story
structures.
Mr. Morton asked for clarification on the issue of the sidewalks in the cul-de-sac. Mayor
Taylor advised that he would not support Mr. Morton's request to eliminate the sidewalks
in that area. Mr. Morton agreed to put in the sidewalks adjacent to the houses.
Mayor Taylor clarified that the only condition the Commission is changing is Comment #12.
That change permits the street width to be 40' rather than 50'. He is comfortable with all
other conditions including the comments made by the Commission this evening.
Motion
Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz moved to approve pending all of the recommends by staff are
adhered to.
26
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
September 4, 1996
Attorney Cherof advised that the motion should include everything with the exception of
Comment #12. He reviewed Exhibit "F". Everything on Page 1 is included with the
exception of Comment #12, which is rejected. On the additional comments sheet,
Comment #12 will read as follows:
Minimum street right-of-way width for a local street with two mountable
curbs is 40', with swales, minimum right-of-way width is 60'.
On Page 2, Comments #17 through 33 are all included. Comment #27 has been changed
to require the landscaping "90 days after plat approval at which time all building permits
and certificates of occupancy issuance cease". City Manager Parker explained that the
City Commission has agreed with the requirements of the comment relative to medians
being in prior to recording of the plat.
Attorney Cherof repeated that Comments #17 through 33 are included. Comments #34
through 47, 48 through 56, and 57 are included with the last paragraph of Comment #57
deleted. In its place, add:
The entire berm and landscaping to be installed within 90 days of plat
approval. Failure to complete construction shall operate the barring of
the issuance and any permits and Certificates of Occupancy.
Comment #58 is rejected. Comments #59 and 60 are included. Comments #61 through
69 are included. Comment #70 is modified to read:
The maximum height is established at 30' rather than 25'.
The remaining comments are included.
Mr. Morton asked for clarification on the timing of the median. He questioned whether the
Commission wants it irrigated and installed prior to the time of plat. Mayor Taylor
responded affirmatively.
Mr. Morton explained that he will be coming in with modifications to the medians, and all
of that landscaping will have to be removed.
Mr. Morton also added that with regard to Comment #59, there is a 12' utility easement.
Half of the easement is in the berm and half is in the utility easement. The applicant has
agreed with the recommendation of the Utilities Department not to put in Oak trees or
Gumbo Limbo. The applicant will install Palm trees, and they would not be put over the
force main. Therefore, the applicant has slightly modified the landscape plan behind Lots
8 and 9. The comment is actually saying that the applicant must move six additional feet
in, and that would make the lots difficult to build on.
27
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
September 4, 1996
City Manager Parker advised that staff's recommendation is that the applicant move the
easement 6' to the south so that larger plants can be installed and there will not be any
encroachment to the south.
Mr. Morton asked for authorization to allow those two lots to conform to the Lehnertz plan
for 19', but in the last 6', allow them to put in Palm trees and other material approved by
staff .
In response to Mayor Taylor's question about whether or not the staff would have a
problem with this suggestion, City Manager Parker stated that staff is willing to work with
Mr. Morton. However, staff did not want Mr. Morton to use the utility restriction to eliminate
landscaping items that were requested. Staff wants the flexibility to request the shifting of
the easement so that we can keep the full landscaping as opposed to decreasing the
landscaping.
Attorney Cherof advised that Comment #1 and Comment #59 give staff and Mr. Morton the
opportunity to work this out.
Mr. Morton would like agreement that he does not have to move the easement 6' to the
south. In those two particular lots, he will use the plant material recommended by Pete
Mazzella rather than planting Oak and Gumbo Limbo.
Mr. Haag pointed out that in Comment #1, the Utilities Department is concerned about
where the tree is planted and the extension of the limbs. Utilities feels the tree is in the
easement even when the tree canopy is in the easement.
Commissioner Titcomb suggested that this item be worked out with staff without changing
the conditions.
Mayor Taylor questioned why staff has a problem with Mr. Morton changing the trees in this
area. City Manager Parker explained that the Palm trees will not provide the same buffer
that the canopies of Oak trees provide. In addition, Mr. Haag explained that this area
begins at Lots 8 and 9 and extends into the cul-de-sac area.
Attorney Cherof suggested adding language at the end of Comment #59 which states:
Obtain staff approval to use substitute plantlngs along this portion of
the buffer.
City Manager Parker pointed out that by moving the easement, staff does not know how
much of the back yard is a problem. The property owners need to use their back yards.
Mr. Haag explained that these lots are deeper. They measure 125' deep. The setback to
the building is 40' to the north property line. The edge of the easement is 3' from the
28
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
September 4, 1996
buildable area that Mr. Morton established.
Commissioner Bradley realized that the only real loss would be on the property description.
They would have buildable area up to the limit.
City Manager Parker recommended that Mr. Morton be allowed to plant Palm trees instead
of Oak trees in this particular area, but must plant two Palm trees in place of every one Oak
tree. Mr. Morton was agreeable to this solution.
Motion
Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz moved to approve with changes as outlined in Attorney Cherof's
reiteration of going through the conditions and verbiage stated. Commissioner Bradley
seconded the motion which carried 5-0.
MAYOR TAYLOR DECLARED A BRIEF RECESS. THE MEETING RECONVENED AT
9:45 P.M.
IX. NEW BUSINESS:
A. Items for discussion requested by Commissioner Matt Bradley
1 . Qualifications for student appointments to the Advisory Board on
Children & Youth
Commissioner Bradley stated that he solicited a young woman who is a member of his
church for membership on the Advisory Board on Children and Youth. When she agreed
to serve, Mayor Taylor appointed her as a Regular/Student member of the board. Our
Code requires all members of this board to be residents of the City. Mayor Taylor was
unaware of the fact that she was not a City resident. She attended a meeting and was a
contributor.
There are three student positions on the board. Two of the positions are voting members;
the third is not. Commissioner Bradley suggested that the third student position include
criteria to allow participation by a student from outside the City.
The Commissioners were in agreement with this suggestion for the following reasons:
1. This person could provide input on things that are going on
outside of the City limits;
2. Many times, student member positions remain vacant for the
entire year; and
29
Nancy Worrell
712 s.W. 4th.Av~nue
13Y7 -()50v/
Ed and Lisa Waters
709 s.W. 4th Avenue
737-1381
Vinola Rada
719 s.W. 3rd Avenue
735-3842
Robin Hanna
S.W. 3rd Avenue
735-3842
Gary Lehnertz
619 s.W. 2nd Avenue
737 -2753
Mary Ann Fornataro
718 s.W. 4th Avenue
738-5725
Carol Fretwell
713 S.W. 3rd Avenue
737 -6424
Robert Reardon
648 s.W. 4th Avenue
734-2906
Margaret Roberts
Leisureville
Roy Essery
118 s.W. 8th Court
732-4914
l.. -'1'ilt;- b' c~w; 1'Vi L;.s r- ~? l'~j/'l1t::/Vd::-S
~tU:: C.AJ U-6J hv '17/J-r/9(
~6A,a.(Ji'A/6 /}J!:. ;t4JIuL flu,,-
/1-1 / L IU fo/) I
/1"1,,()/JIIA(,..?f fAV'
tA/tJiJ U3 /Z16U fJ~ fv j)
Homeowner (Michael Czecholinski?)
706 s.W. 4th Avenue
738-6395
.
~ L'h.~:,~;..,,~..;->;~.~~-~;s,_~:";:;~l.,.:.-it.i,~-,;h~.!2: ~'," .:~-\ ,_::",,,,_,_,;!(;:,~,-,~,->,:(,;,;"" 1, .;..'<
t
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-475
TO:
Carrie Parker
City Manager
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP, ~
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
DA TE:
September 12, 1996
SUBJECT:
Copies of Development Plans of Current Projects
Scheduled for Review by the City Commission at the
September 17, 1996 City Commission Meeting
Please find attached five (5) sets of plans for the following current development projects:
Conditional Use
St. Joseph's Episcopal Church
COUS 96-004
Master Plan Modification
Woolbright Place PUD (POD 1)
(2nd Submittal)
MPMD 96-005
Major Site Plan Modification -
Boynton Beach Community Development
Corporation office
MSPM 96-006
New Site Plan
Flower's Bakery Warehouse/Distribution Center
- Quantum Park PID
NWSP 96-006
Note: Please return the plans/documents to the Planning and Zoning Department
following the meeting.
If I can be of further assistance, please contact me.
T JH:bme
Attachments
cc: Central File
Subject File
a:tranplan.912
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
SEPTEMBER 10, 1996
Mr. Milord advised that the addition is another classroom and some washroom areas. He
agreed with all staff's conditions of approval.
Motion
Vice Chairman Golden moved to approve the request for conditional use approval for
construction of a 1,878 square foot addition to Building NO.5 to include a new classroom,
a covered walkway and a washroom facility in the 51. Joseph's Episcopal Church and
School complex, subject to staff comments. Mr. Elsner seconded the motion.
No one in the audience wished to address this item.
The motion carried 6-0.
Rezoning
2.
Project:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Description:
Motion
East Ridge PUD
John A. Grant, Jr., Inc.
Gary De Graf, De Graf, Inc.
Northeast of intersection of N.E. 4th Street and N.E. 20th
Avenue
Request for master plan approval for 34 single-family
units in connection with a rezoning of 5.01 acres from R-
3 to PUD (Planned Unit Development) with an LUI of
7.00.
Vice Chairman Golden moved to continue the public hearing for the rezoning for the East
Ridge PUD to the October 8, 1996 Planning and Development Board meeting. Mr. Aguila
seconded the motion, which carried 6-0.
B. Subdivision
Master Plan Modification
1.
Project:
Location:
Woolbright Place PUD (Pod 1) (2nd Submittal)
Approximately 2,000 feet north of the intersection of
6
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
SEPTEMBER 10, 1996
Applicant:
Owner:
Description:
Woolbright Road and S.W. 8th Street
Richard C. Wohlfarth, P.E. - CCL Consultants
Howard Scharlin, Trustee
Request to amend the previously approved master plan
for 14.05 acres to change the dwelling units within Pod
1 from 90 multi-family dwelling units to 84 single-family,
detached dwelling units; to reduce the north setback from
60 feet to 40 feet and reduce the perimeter building
setback along S.W. 8th Street from 40 feet to 25 feet;
to establish a 15 foot south perimeter building setback
and a 20 foot east perimeter building setback, and add
private recreation facilities.
Chairman Dube advised that this has already been approved by the City Commission, and
it is before this board to determine whether it is a substantial or non substantial change.
Ms. Heyden advised the board of the procedure. This first went to the City Commission
for a determination of a substantial or nonsubstantial change. They determined it to be a
nonsubstantial change and forwarded it to the Planning and Development Board for final
determination and review of the comments. Mr. Wische said he attended the City
Commission meeting at which this item was discussed for two hours. He was prepared to
make a motion.
Motion
Mr. Wische moved that this is not a substantial change and approve it subject to staff
comments. Vice Chairman Golden seconded the motion.
Michael Morton stated that the plan before the board this evening has already been
conformed to meet all of the changes that the City Commission requested.
The motion carried 6-0.
Chairman Dulle asked if anyone in the audience wished to comment on this item; however,
no one did.
7
7.B.l
MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
WOOLBRIGHT PLACE PUD (POD 1)
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-453
FROM:
Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
J'v.. 0. 11 tf..,
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP
Planning and Zoning Director
TO:
DATE:
September 5, 1996
SUBJECT: Woolbright Place PUD - Master Plan Modification
File No. MPMD 96-005
At the September 4, 1996, City Commission meeting, the City Commission
made a finding of no substantial change regarding the modifications
requested for the above-referenced master plan modification. Their finding
included conditions of approval that are, in part, identified in the attached
staff report, and formally established in the attached Development Order,
dated September 4, 1996. For your information, the conditions described in
the original staff report to the City Commission (Planning and Zoning
Memorandum No. 96-433) remain valid, with the exception of conditions #12,
#57, #58, #59, and #70 which were modified by the City Commissioners and
itemized on the last page of the Development Order. Staff recommends that
this request for modifications to the above-referenced master plan be
approved, as endorsed and conditioned by the City Commission.
T JH:meh:dim
xc: Central File
a:MPMD6005.
.,
PL. ..NNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-433
Agenda Memorandum for
September 4, 1996 City Commission Meeting
TO:
Carrie Parker
City Manager
/f. ./. (_. 7f-- A-
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
DATE:
August 28,1996
SUBJECT: Woolbright Place PUD - Master Plan Modification
File No. MPMD 96-005
Please place the above-referenced request on the September 4, 1996 City Commission agenda
for Commission action under Development Plans.
NA TURE OF REQUEST
Michael Morton, agent for Howard Scharlin trustee/property owner of the Woolbright Place PUD,
is requesting approval to modify the previously approved master plan for the Woolbright Place PUD
(see Exhibit "A" - letter of request and proposed master plan). The requested modifications are
limited to that portion of the PUD that is entitled Pod 1. Pod 1 is a 14.05 acre parcel which is
iocated on the east side of Southwest 8th Street and is approximately 2,250 feet north of
Woolbright Road (see Exhibit "B" -location map). The changes described are as follows:
1. Change the type of units in Pod 1 from 90 multi-family units to 84 single-family, detached
units. The following building and site regulations are proposed for the typical lots in Pod 1:
Perimeter Building Setbacks:
North property line
East property line
South property line
West property line
reduction from 60 feet to 40 feet
20 feet
reduction from 20 feet to 15 feet
reduction from 40 feet to 25 feet
Site and Building Regulations (typical lot);
Minimum lot width
Minimum lot area
Minimum front yard
Minimum front yard
(to garage)
Minimum rear yard
Minimum side yard
(interior)
Minimum side yard
( corner)
Minimum living area
(AlC)
Maximum lot coverage
Maximum building
height
42 feet
3,990 square feet
15 feet
20 feet
15 feet
6 feet
12 feet
1,000 square feet
40 percent
30 feet
Screen enclosure (screen roof) setbacks:
Front 15 feet
Rear 5 feet
Side (interior) 6 feet
Side (corner) 12 feet
2,
Page 2
Woolbright Place PUD
Master Plan Modification
Memorandum No. 96-433
File No. 96-005
Pool and Spa setbacks:
Front
Rear
Side (interior)
Side (corner)
none specified
7 feet
8 feet
7 feet
2. Modify the north landscape buffer as follows:
For each one hundred (100) lineal feet of the buffer, two (2) Red Cedar trees (large canopy)
and three (3) Sabal Palms have been added (see Exhibit IICII - Proposed North Buffer Plan).
The large group of fourteen (14) Slash Pine trees, previously spread out along the entire
75 lineal feet of buffer, has been divided into clusters of three (3) and added to each 100
foot section of the buffer (see Exhibit 11011 - Approved North Buffer Plan).
3. Omittance of the 25 foot wide landscape buffer to have been located at the east, west and
north sides of the land titled Open Parce; Area (Undisturbed).
4. Reduction in the width of the landscc::pe buffer'along S.W. 8t';.Street adjacent to lots #44
through #48 and #1 through #7 from 25 feet to 10 feet (I1C landscape material has been
specified for the new buffer).
5. Addition of an optional wall or rail fence and project signage at Southwest 8th Street.
6. Addition of a community pool in Pod 1 to serve Pod 1.
7. Request a private road system and installation of an entry gate.
8. Addition of trees and hedging within the ten (10) foot wide landscape buffer easement
located along the south and east perimeter of the pod. .
BACKGROUND
The Woolbright Place PUD consists of 80.34 acres and is approved for a tota; of 656 units (16
duplex units and 640 multi-family units). The 656 units equal a density of 8.16 dwelling units per
acre.
Pod 1 is currently master plan approved for 90 multi-family units and was split-off as a separate
residential parcel within the PUD when 548 of the multi-family units within the ?UD were subdivided
for the liThe Vinings at Boynton Beachll project. The Vinings was further subdivided into two (2)
phases. Phase One (1) was platted on February 21,1996 and construction is complete. The latest
approved master plan for the Woolbright Place PUD is shown in the attached Exhibit IIEII.
The following land uses and zoning districts abut the subject property:
North -
Single-family homes zoned R-1A (Single-Family Residential);
East -
Vacant land site plan approved for apartments (The Vinings, Phase II) and
zoned PUD (Planned Unit Development);
South -
Vacant land site plan approved for apartments, (The Vinings, Phase II) and
zoned PUD; and
West -
S.W. 8th Street and a water maniJgement tract zoned PUD.
The City's Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2.5-Planned Unit Development, states that
changes in Planned Unit Developments shall be processed as follows:
3
Page 3
Woolbright Place PUD
Master Plan Modification
Memorandum No. 96-433
File No. 96-005
"Section 12. Changes in plans.
Changes in plans approved as part of the zoning to PUD may be permitted by the Planning
and Zoning Board upon application filed by the developer or his successors in interest, prior
to the expiration of the PUD classification, but only [after] a finding that any such change or
changes are in accord with all regulations in effect when the change or changes are
requested and the intent and purpose of the comprehensive plan in effect at the time of the
proposed change. Substantial changes shall be proposed as for a new application of PUD
zoning. The determination of what constitutes a substantial change shall be within the
sole discretion of the City Commission. Non-substantial changes as determined by the
City Commission on plans shall not extend the expiration of the eighteen (18) month
approval for the PUD classification."
Also, pursuant to Resolution No. R95-65, which sets forth an expedited review of development
applications submitted to the City by the property owner, the special-schedule established by staff
and the applicant for processing this request is as follows:
August 16, 1996
Application/plans received (2nd submittal).
August 16, 1996
Plans distributed to the Technical Review Committee (TRC).
Written comments due to the Planning and Zoning Department
at the end or the day of August 23, 1996 for preparation of staff
report to commission.
August 20, 1996
TRC meeting held.
(Note: The expedited process does not require resubmittal by
the applicant. The only exception to this would be resubmittal
voluntarily by the applicant. The applicant did choose to
resubmit this request, therefore, staff comments are a result of
reviewing a second submittal set of plans.)
September 4, 1996 -
City Commission meeting.
September 10, 1996 -
Planning and Development Board meeting
September 17, 1996 -
City Commission meeting, if deemed necessary by the city
attorney.
ANAL YSIS
Staff has reviewed this request for consistency with the PUD development standards, and the intent
and purpose of Planned Unit Developments as stated in the following sections of Chapter 2.5 of
the City's Land Development Regulations:
"Section 1. Intent and purpose
A Planned Unit Development District (PUD) is established. It is intended that this district be
utilized to promote efficient and economical land use, improved amenities, appropriate and
harmonious variety in physical development, creative design, improved living environment,
orderly and economical development in the City and the protection of adjacent and existing
and future City development. The district is suitable for development, redevelopment and
conservation of land, water and other resources of the City.
Regulations for Planned Unit Developments are intended to accomplish the purposes of
zoning, subdivision regulations and other applicable City regulations to the same degree that
they are intended to control development on a lot-by-Iot basis. In view of the substantial
li
Page 4
Woolbright Place PUD
Master Plan Modification
Memorandum No. 96-433
File No. 96-005
public advantages of Planned Unit Development, :t is the intent of PUD regulatiol"s to
promote and encourage development in this form where tracts suitable in size, location and
character for the uses and structures proposed are to be planned and developed as unified
and coordinated units.
Section 9. Internal PUD standards
B. INTERNAL LOTS AND FRONTAGE. "Within the boundaries of the PUD, no minimum
lot size or minimum, yards shall be required; provided, however, that PUD frontage on
dedicated public roads shall observe front yard requirements in accordance with the zoning
district the PUD use most closely resembles and that peripheral yards abutting other zoning
districts shall be the same as required in the abutting zone."
With respect to the changes requested;
1. The change from 90 multi-family units to 84 single-family units represents a reduction of six
(6) units. The gross density for the 14.05 acres in Pod 1 would r~duce from 6.40 to 5.98
units per acre.
Regarding the proposed building and site regulations and perimeter setbacks, these issues
are addressed in detail in Planning and Zoning Departl1'lert comm9nts included in Exhibit
"F" - Conditions of Approval. Planning and Zoning Departmen~ comments include
recommendations regarding building and site regulations which staff believes are in the best
interest of the adjacent neighborhood and the residents of the development. With respect
to minimum lot size, it should be noted that the proposed minimu.'ll of 3,990 square feet is
below the 4,000 square foot lot area that is presently the smallest lot size allowed for single-
family detached homes.
2. The north buffer has been enhanced with the addition of the Red Ceders and Palm, and
through the redistribution of the Slash Pines, as changes may create a more dense buffer
between the subject project and the adjacent residential development to the north (as shown
on the approved buffer plan). Staff also considers the landscape buffer plan proposed by
the applicant, subject to staff recommendations, to be compatible with the approved buffer
plan (Resolution R92-210) . However the location of the large trees shown on the proposed
plan and the approved plan are in conflict with the tree location guidelines established in the
FPL brochure "Plant the Right Tree in the Right Place". FPL's objective is to provide reliable
and uninterrupted service, and therefore, have developed a brochur~ containing specific tree
species that are recommended to be planted within a certain distance of overhead power
lines. The brochure indicates that large trees (those trees that are greater than 30 feet at
maturity) are recommended to be placed no closer than 30 feet from overhead power lines,
medium trees (those trees that are 20 to 30 feet tall at maturity) within 20 feet of the power
lines and small trees (those trees that are less than 20 feet tall at maturity) are allowed to
be planted under power lines. The Live Oak, Gumbo Limbo, Slash Pine and Red Cedar
trees shown on the proposed plan and approved plan are listed in the brochure as large
trees, which should not be planted within 30 feet from power lines. Conditions regarding
type of species, location of plants, planting specifications (size and quantity), timing for the
installation of the north buffer and relocation of the utility easement and or north buffer
easement are identified in the Planning and Zoning Department comments specified in
Exhibit "F" - Conditions of Approval.
3. The omission of the 25 foot wide approved landscape buffer along the east and north sides
of that portion of the project identified as Open Parcel Area (Undisturbed) is inconsistent
with the agreement referenced in resolution R92-210, and in particular, where it regards a
continuous buffer between the proposed development and the existing development to the
north. Although this open area may no longer warrant a buffer, and the existing vegetition
on this area may itself represent a buffer, the agreement still establishes the type of buffer
to be situated along the north parimeter of the project. As for the interior of this open area,
~
CCl CONSULTANTS, INC.
Engineers
Planners
5U1veyors
Landscape Architects
Environmental Consultants
2200 PARK CENTRAL BLVD., N, SUITE 100, POMPANO BEACH, Fl33064, (954} 974-2200. FAX (954) 973-2686
August 2, 1996
--
1/[':, JL@ rn 0 W
U~l . c .:..~
ItM!~lmG AND
lONING DEPT.
~
Mr. Michael Haag
Planning & Zoning
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
Re: Woolbright Place PUD - New Master Plan Modification (POD I)
14-Acre Parcel, Boynton Beach, Florida
CCL's Project No. 3425-02
Dear Mr. Haag:
Please find enclosed (12) copies of our modified Master Plan for the above~referenced project
along with a check in the amount of $500.00 for the review fee. Pursuant to our recent
conversations, this is a revision to the previously submitted plans that were reviewed by DRC
and City Council over the past four months. The primary revisions to the plans are as follows:
I. The 25' landscape buffer located on the north end is now shown on the plans.
2. Pursuant to an agreement with the City Utilities Department, we have rerouted the force
main to be within the 25' landscape buffer (see sheet 2 of 2).
3. The smallest lot on the plan is now 42' x 95' which are the seven (7) lots adjacent to the
recreation area.
4. The recreation area has been internalized pursuant to comments from the City Council.
5. The landscape buffers and the building setbacks are detailed on the plan and we believe
are in keeping with discussions that took place during the review process.
Page 8
Woolbright Place PUD (POD 1)
File No. MPMD 96-005
-
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
74. To establish, a minimum floor area for the proposed units that is comparable to the
minimum floor area required in the single-family homes abutting the project to the
north, it is recommended that additional information be added to project summary
note number 5 found on sheet MP2 of 2 indicating that 1,250 square feet is the
minimum floor area. Also add to note 5 the required square footage regulations listed
in Section 4. K. of Chaoter 2 - Zonina of the City's Land develooment Regulations.
75. Provide proper authorization, for the subject request, by submit written verification
from the board of directors of the Woolbright Place Master Association, Inc. indicating
that Richard C. Wohlfarth, P.E. of CCL Consultants, Inc. is their reoresentative.
76. Submission of a rectified master plan showing compliance with the conditions of approval
for the project will be required to be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department,
in triolicate, prior to plattina and/or site plan review for the PUD.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
77. To be detemimed.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
78. To be determined.
MEH:bme
a:\COMWOOL.\l\lPD
Page 6
Woolbright Place PUD (POD 1)
File No. MPMD 96-005
DEPARTMENTS
58. To install the approved 25 foot wide landscape buffer plan, as identified in Resolution
R92-210, in compliance with the FPL guidelines regarding proximity of large trees to
overhead power lines, the location of the buffer, berm and large trees within the buffer
will have to be relocated so that the row of large trees shown on the north side of the plan
are 30 feet away from the power lines. The Slash Pine, Live Oak and Gumbo Limbo trees
identified on the approved plan are listed as large trees in the FPL brochure. It is
recommended that prior to plat approval the applicant submit a site plan review request
that depicts the buffer planting plans for all areas of the project that include buffer
plantings on single-family platted lots. The submittal shall include planting plans of the
north buffer that have been reviewed and approved by FPL. If the FPl approval requires
trees to be omitted or a reduction in size specifications or change in location of tree
material the north buffer easement and plantings shall be moved into the site a distance
consistent with FPl specifications. The below listed planting changes and specification
are recommended to be added to the approved buffer plan to clarify a typical section of
buffer plan.
Trees: First one hundred lineal feet of buffer plant three (3) (fifty foot on center), 12 to
14 foot tall Live Oak trees placed three feet from the north side of the 25 foot wide buffer
easement and plant two (2) (fifty foot on center alternating spacing from the oaks located
on the north side of the buffer), 12 to 14 foot tall Live Oak trees placed three feet north
of the south side of the buffer easement. The next seventy-five feet of the buffer install
a grouping fourteen (14) (ten feet on center), 12 to 14 foot tall Slash Pines (7 on each
side of the top of the berm). For the next one hundred feet of buffer plant three (3) (fifty
foot on center), 12 to 14 foot tall Gumbo Limbo trees placed three feet from the north side
of the 25 foot wide buffer and plant two (2) (fifty foot on center alternating spacing from
the gumbo limbo located on the north side of the buffer), 12 to 14 foot tall Gumbo Limbo
trees placed three feet north of the south side of the buffer. The previous three sections
of tree plantings shall be repeated the entire length of the landscape buffer easement.
Hedges: Install, fifty-one (51), twenty-four inch to thirty-six (24 to 36) inch tall Coco
Plum plants along the top of the four foot tall berm and space the plants 2 feet on center.
The plants shall form a continuous hedge row the entire length of the buffer. For each
100 foot or 75 foot section of the buffer Coco Plum and Wax Myrtle plants shall be
alternated.
Shrubs: Spot plant forty (40), forty-eight to sixty (48 to 60) inch tall, at time of planting,
containerized Saw Palmetto palms around each group of 14 Slash Pine trees (20 palms
on each side of the top of the berm). Install, forty-eight (48), thirty-six inch to forty-eight
(36 to 48) inch tall Randia plants, five (5) foot on center, alternating 12 plants each side
ofthe top ofthe berm at 25 foot intervals. For each 75 or 100 foot section of the buffer
alternate Randia, Myrsine, Florida Privet, Wild Coffee or Necklace Pod plants. The
shrubs shall be placed in a manner to form a meandering shape of the buffer as viewed
from the plan view.
Ground Cover: Omit the Lantana plants (deciduous) and replace with a total of two
hundred (200), 12 to 18 inch tall Liriope plants (evergreen). The Liriope shall be planted
on 12 inch centers with 100 plants installed on each side of the berm at each 100 foot or
75 foot typical section. The plants are to be placed to accentuate the meandering shape
of the buffer. One hundred (100) Fakahatchee grass or Liriope plants may be alternated
each 100 foot or 75 foot section of the buffer.
It is recommended that this entire buffer be installed prior to the issuance of the
Certificate of Occupancy of any recreation structure, sales model facility or of a
residential unit, whichever comes first.
59. To ensure that the north property line landscape buffer is continuous at the rear of lots
8 and 9, either move the proposed city utility easement six (6) feet to the south so that
the city utility easement does not encroach the landscape buffer easement or re-route
the utility easement to run north and south between lots 9 and 10.
60. It is recommended that the approved landscape buffer easement and planting be
continued along the east and north sides of the land identified on the submitted plans as
Open Parcel Area (Undisturbed). The buffer should terminate at the east side of S. W.
8th Street at the northwest corner of the PUD. This recommendation may be omitted if
the City Forester/Environmentalist determines that the existing landscape material
located on the ODen Darcel creates a buffer eaual to the aDDroved buffer.
INCLUDE
REJECT
Page 5
Woolbright Place PUD (POD 1)
File No. MPMD 96-005
DEPARTMENTS
57. To install the buffer plan proposed by the applicant (25 feet wide abutting the north
property line of the PUD) in compliance with the FPL guidelines regarding planting trees
near overhead power lines, the tree materials identified on the plan would have to be
changed. The reason the tree material should be changed is that the north portion of the
proposed buffer overlaps a five foot wide utility easement that has overhead power lines.
One-half of the five (5) foot wide utility easement occupies the north 2.5 feet of lots 8
through 22. It is recommended that prior to plat approval the applicant submit a site
plan review request that depicts the buffer planting plans for all areas of the project that
include buffer plantings on single-family platted lots. The submittal shall include
planting plans for the north buffer that have been reviewed and approved by FPL. If the
FPL approval requires the omission of trees, reduction in tree size specifications or
change in location of tree material the, north buffer easement and plantings shall be
moved into the site a distance that would allow FPL to approve the proposed planting
scheme and recommended planting specifications. The below listed planting changes
and specifications are recommended to be added to the proposed plan to describe a
typical 1 00 foot section of the buffer.
Trees: Specify the two (2) Red Cedar trees, three (3) Slash Pines, one (1) Live Oak,
two (2) Gumbo Limbo and three (3) Sabal Palm trees shall be twelve (12) feet tall at time
of planting.
Hedges: Show fifty-one (51), twenty-four inch to thirty-six (24 to 36)inch tall Coco
Plum plants along the top of the four foot tall berm and space the plants 2 feet on center.
The plants shall form a continuous hedge row the entire length of the buffer.
Shrubs: The 24 Saw Palmetto plants shown on the plan shall be thirty to thirty-six
(30-36) inches tall (15 gallon) at time of planting. Install forty-eight (48), thirty-six inch to
forty-eight (36 to 48) inch tall Myrsine plants, spaced five (5) foot on center, alternating
12 plants each side of the top of the berm 25 foot intervals. For each 100 lineal feet of
buffer alternate Myrsine, Randia, Wax Myrtle, Florida Privet, Wild Coffee and Necklace
Pod plants. The shrubs shall be placed in a manner to form a meandering shape of the
buffer as viewed from the plan view.
Ground Cover: Omit the Purple and Yellow Lantana plants (deciduous) and replace
with a total of two hundred (200),12 to 18 inch tall Liriope plants (evergreen). The Liriope
shall be planted on 12 inch centers with 100 plants installed on each side of the berm for
each 75 or 100 foot section of the buffer. The Liriope plants shall be installed to
accentuate the meandering shape of buffer.
It is recommended that this entire buffer be installed prior to the issuance of the
Certificate of Occupancy of any recreation structure, sales model facility or of a
residential unit whichever comes first.
INCLUDE
REJECT
Page 4
Woolbright Place PUD (POD 1)
File No. MPMD 96-005
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
48. On sheet MP2 of 2, modify general note 1 to indicate the 0.32 acre private recreation
tract, the 1.47 acre open area parcel and the 2.64 acre private road tract located within
Pod 1 are owned, operated and perpetually maintained by the projects homeowner's
association. Include any other land area that is proposed to be common land for the
development.
49. To clarify general note 4 found on MP2 of 2, move the note to sheet MP1 of 2 and show
on the plan the location size, and shape of the medians adjacent to the street frontage
of the subject PUD. It is recommended that the last three words of note 4 be changed
from homeowner's association to Woolbright Place Master Association, Inc.
50. Prior to plat approval of Pod 1, Homeowner's Association documents will be required to
be submitted for review by staff. The documents shall comply with the specifications
identified in Chapter 2.5 - Planned Unit Development, Section 6 and Chapter 5 - Platting.
Article V, Section 1 D 11 of the City's Land Development Regulations.
51. On sheet MP1 of 2 modify general note 9 by omitting the last sentence and adding the
words lias defined on each plat within the PUD" before the period at the end of the first
sentence.
52. To clarify the issue regarding location of fences on perimeter lots within Pod 1, move
general note 9 found on sheet MP1 of 2 to sheet MP2 of 2 and place it below the typical
lot drawings depicting lots with perimeter landscape buffer easements.
53. To clarify the areas of the project that will require site plan review, add text to general
note 12 found on sheet MP2 of 2 indicating that site plan review is also required for the
site wall or fence. landscaping for the open parcel and project signage located at the
entrance to the site.
54. To provide privacy for lots 1 and 48. it is recommended that a common ground tract of
land be shown on both sides of the entrance road. This can be accomplished by moving
the adjacent row of lots to the north and south.
55. To provide privacy for lot 84 which is abutting the east side of the proposed private
recreation pool, it is recommended that either the pool and cabana exchange locations
or the cabana and pool be rotated ninety (90) degrees in a clockwise direction.
56. Specify on sheet MP1 of 2. the approved total peak hour trips that are allocated for the
PUD and indicate how may trips are generated for the existing and proposed
development for each Darcel or pod identified on the master plan.
Page 3
Woolbright Place PUt) (POD 1)
File No. MPMD 96-005
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
34. To provide a more efficient layout of the project regarding street design for services
provided by the city such as fire rescue, emergency services and sanitation pick-up, it
is recommended that the lot design in the northeast and southwest portions of the project
be redesigned by omitting lots or creating pie shaped lots on a street radius rather than
allowing the short dead end streets that do not have a cul-de-sac turn-around.
35. Submit a landscape plan for the area identified as open parcel area (u:"}d~stUTbed). The
plan shall include grading elevations, type of landscape material, plant mate!lial
specifications inclUding type of lawn grass and irrigation requirements.
36. All parking spaces provid~'d or required for the recreation pool area shall be designed to I
comply with the city regulations specified in the City's Land Development Regulations,
Chapter 23 - Parking Lots. Amend the plan accordingly.
37. To maintain consistency regarding the building setback for the perimeter of the project
it is recommended that the proposed forty (40) foot building setback remain around the
perimeter of the portion of the site titled Open Parcel Area (Undisturbed), including the
south property line of the proposed tract.
38. On sheet MP1 of 2, identify the new name of Morton's Way, as specified in resolution
R96-112.
39. On sheet MP1 of 2, change general note 1 and 3 to reflect the method the developer is
or has complied with the city's recreation requirement for the entire PUD. In describing
the approved or proposed method, delineate the compliance by showing the
computations per each pod or parcel within the PUD.
40. It is recomr.r~fl"ded that a twenty (20) foot setback be established around the recreation
pool area. Show and dil1:lension on sheet MP2 of 2"the 20 foot setback for structures
and all recreation amenities.
,
41. It is recommended *hat the depth of lots 71 through 77 be reduced 0.5 feet to allow ~he
depth (If lots 78 ~hrough 84 to be increased ~rom 95 feet to 95.5 feet which would
establish a minimum lot size for the development of 4,U37.5 s<;uare feet rather than ~I'e '! ~
proposed 3,990 sq~are feet. The present minimum Ic~; size, in the city for single-family!
detache~ units, is 4,000 square feet. i
42. To clarify the> minimum standards for the PUD, amend the project summary nlite 7 found
on sheet MP2 of 2 as follows:
Minimum lot size: 42' X 95.5' (4,037.5 square feet)
Minimum lot frontage 42'*
* Lot frontage shall be measured at the 15 foot front setback line for the following
irregular shaped lots; 1-8 and 45-48.
43. On sheet MP1 of 2, add a general note indicating that the PUD is subject to the
conditions of approval of City of Boynton Beach Resolution R96-112 regarding the
reduction in the width of Morton's Way.
44. Add to ,the master plan submittal the previously approved landscape plans for S. W. 8th
Street, the water management area, lake plantings and the preservation area
requirements.
45. Add to the site data fOfJnd on sheet MP1 of 2, the density (number of dwelling units per ~ I I
acre) represented for the gross acreage of the PUD. Also identify the land use
classification of the pu~ as defined on the City's Future Land Use Map.
46. On sheet MP1 of 2, amend the south border of the Woolbright Place PUD on the west '
side of S. W. 8th Street to correctly identify the property line that separates the Woolbright
Place PUD from the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD as established by Ordinance 89-18.
Ordinance 89-18 is the ordinance that established the PUD. Rectify the Woolbright Place
PUD plat documents to correspond with Ordinance 89-18. It is recommended that the
land shown on the master plan within the Church Parcel that is not zoned PUD be
rezoned, by the applicant, from PCD to PUD, unless otherwise determined unnecessary
by the city attorney. Amend the legal description, plans and site data on sheet MP1 of
2 accordingly.
47. Sheet MP1 of 2 indicates that Pod 1 will have 5 common recreation amenities; however,
the plans onlv reflect a pool. Correct the plans accordinQly.
- Page 2
Woolbright Place PUD (POD 1)
File No. MPMD 96-005
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
17. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the city's code requirements at time of
application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following: site lighting,
paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and traffic control devices. Permits
required from agencies such as the FOOT, PBC, SFWMD and any other permitting
agency shall be included with your permit reQuest.
18. Revise documents to reflect all comments.
19. Verify which roads require naming (for mail delivery) with U.S. Postal Service.
20. Indicate name of subdivision. Chap.3, Sec.3A, pg. 3-4.
21. Show location, names and elevations of adjacent subdivisions. Chap.3, Sec.3E, pg.3-4.
22. Show topographical conditions on tract. Chap.3, Sec.3G, pg.3-4.
23. Provide generalized statement of subsurface conditions. Chap.3, Sec.3M, pg.3-5.
24. Show utilities on or adjacent to the tract. Chap.3, Sec.30, pg.3-5.
25. Dead end streets are prohibited. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.10T, pg.6-14.
26. Permits must be obtained for work within RO.W. Chap.22, Art.II, Sec.7A, pg.22-3.
27. Complete irrigated landscaping in S.W. 8th Street RO.W. including medians and areas
outside pavement edges prior to recording of plat. This includes entire RO.W. from
approximately the south edge of the 14.18 acre church parcel to north terminus of S.W.
8th Street construction. Landscape design must be approved by the City Forester prior
to installation, and the installation itself must be accepted by the City Forester prior to
recording of plat.
28. Show location of relocated 12' utility easement approved by Resolution R95-66.
29. It is recommended that the streets are paved in two lifts.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments:
30. The applicant should submit landscape and irrigation plans for S.W. 8th Street
medians and right-of-ways. The plans should be reviewed and approved by the
Technical Review committee (TRC) for any possible conflicts. The plans should
show quantities, specifications and species of trees with any understory plantings. A
note should be on the plans that the maintenance of the landscape/irrigation
improvements will be provided by the applicant's commercial association.
31. The undisturbed open area portion of the site can be evaluated as a vegetative, visual
barrier only after all of the exotic vegetation has been removed from the site. There
may be voids in the visual buffer after the clearing of exotics that will have to be
landscaped with native species and receive water until established. The present
elevation of this open area is higher than S.W. 8th Street and may change as part of
the project. These activities may affect whether the undisturbed open area can be
used as a visual buffer rather than the applicant planting/irrigating a new buffer along
the western perimeter of the project. The project should continue in the normal review
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
32. As the developer has chosen not to provide five private basic park requirements, the
submittal does not qualify for one-half credit for private recreation.
33. Based on the number of single family units, the following recreation fee applies:
84 single-family units X .0180 = 1.512 acres
As the developer has already paid one-half of the fee, his dedication is: 1.512 divided by
2 = .756 acres. Fee in lieu of land is recommended.
EXHIBIT "F"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Woolbright Place PUD (POD 1)
File number: MPMD 96-005
Reference: The plans consist of 3 sheets identified as 2nd Review, Master Plan Modification. File #MPMD 96-005 with an
August 16, 1996 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking.
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I
PU8L1C WORKS
'~F
UTILITIES
Comments:
1. The utility easement located in the rear of units 8 and 9 shall be located so that large
canopy-style trees do not overhang into the easement. Palm trees and shrubs may be
placed within the easement, but not over the force main. The easement shall also extend
at least 10 feet from the force main to the easement line on the building side, so as to
prevent encroachment by future structures including pools, screen rooms, etc..
2. The same conditions shall apply to that portion of the easement running in a general
north/south direction (i.e. no overhang by large trees into the easement).
FIRE
. NOI
POLICE
Comments:
3. In regard to the entrance security gate, a system that is accessible via telephone by the
police/fire/utility departments. The telephone number would be made available to
police/fire/utility communications. When entrance to the area is necessary,
communications would activate the gates by telephoning the given number. This type
of system allows for maximum security and less number of people knowing the
telephone/access number.
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Comments:
4. No building structure, screen enclosure, pool, or portion thereof is allowed within
setbacks, either now or in the future. Chap.1, Art.II,pg.1-30.
5. Project shall have underground utilities to residential units. Chap. 2.5, Sec.9E, pg.2.5-7.
6. Show the locations of all temporary structures or permanent structures having a
temporary use. Provide a statement outlining the temporary use and when they will be
removed. Chap.3, Art.lV, Sec.3R, pg.3-5.
7. Provide a master stormwater management plan. Chap.3, Art.IV, Sec.3T, pg.3-6.
8. Site plan review and approval required. Chap.4, Sec.2, pg.4-1.
9 Plat review and approval required. Chap.5, Art.II, Sec.1, pg.5-1.
10. Provide certification by Developer's Engineer that drainage plan complies with all city
codes and standards. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec. SA, pg.6-7 and Chap.23, Art.IIF, pg.23-8.
11. Locate all drainage easements. Chap.6, Art.lV, Sec.68, pg.6-9.
12. Minimum street right-of-way width for a local street with 2 mountable curbs is 50 feet; with
swales minimum right-of-way width is 60 feet. Chap.6, Art.lV, Sec.1 DC, pg.6-11.
13. Need SFWMD and LWDD acceptance prior to Engineering approval. Chap.6, Art.VII,
SecA8, pg.6-24.
14. Applicant's attention is directed to Chap.7, pg.7-1 regarding surety requirements.
15. All landscaped areas shall be provided with an automatic water supply system. Chap.7.5,
Art. II, Sec.58, pg.7.5-14.
16. Provide stop signs and stop bars in accordance with the "Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices". Chap.23 Art. II 82 00.23-7.
E X H I BIT
II F II
i
I
f
I
JII
I J II I r
! ~
! I
" :1 . en
I , 0
I :, I 0
I . 1:1 I a
i Jo
~, . ...
..
"1 I Jo
'r
!.
.' I I J II
.'
if ;; .
.
I' : i r
I I . &
.
,
.
I . r &i
. i i I~
~
i : : I.;
I
,
I. I' .:u: I!.
. .. ; :,~;:i: :;~:~: ';f '
';;:;:i~~i;:::!:t,;~i!:i ;i'.
".' I. .: I.., ,0 1:!jIlY" !"r., "j:t-' " .
. .. .;;.' 'i! .,.' ';"';;:!!~1:::Ji!;'::'li!!i! ;'; .'
m: ~m !;? ~::~ m~ m~ m~ I
I:" 'l:. ,," ".: l.!! 'F! '=1" I
'I' '11 t' ,. .." .1. '. ..
;; ;;; q i'.: F' ~;: ~h i
;;; , i,H.' " !h
'/ H .. i': =.1
I: : i . . ~ ; I I
~
i I
I !
t I
>
1J
1J
~
C
~
~
:c
1J
!;
Z
., IiI' ':
f! ,IiI. II
If i,l II
'I', I
! ,'i,1 I
, fll' I
. rul I
" 'II ~
I If I
[ .
; .
. t
:J
~ ;
;=n
.1,
:J1
r
I~
s:
-c
.
.....
: I::;
,~ i ~
· I. - II~i.i
:I~!~~ :
I"'" ; ~
.;i;jj Jg
~. : iil::; r. !:2
~ . :!.::; IJ t' lit
.~ ~ :;;I!;;: ~: .
;~--~. ~;j! ~ ;i
~~', . I~';I; 111:l.I I
:) I :1 '. lIS
r i =~!:j ~ f
'i 0, ;1 /'-- '--.' :
~ ip~-;f I - fIt
I ~I. Hf~ ,'s I'
~.. .. . t~ !;:
j-:..f it b
. ~ Jj ;~
\ ~~~7' '1:>.a'C" ~ ~ c ..,.,.. e-.~.J. ,j
. to - 1I0ATONS WIlY
r- -...,.
i'
,
I
\
\
lili'llll
i.!!lli
,./ .
Jif1li ~'~i
Ii '. ~
" .
\
, ~
~ ..
; e
,
.
.
~
~
, rii
'i ~
5'-
dil
~
...
d ;i
t i
i
Cl
. a
~ :a
, ~
. (
('
. .
c '"
'~ ~
\\
i\_~".. ~
J
r
.! f I :
;1 i' !
1/ :
-
~!.:~:
J'-'!
;:~IJ
f.l,
,,;;,
,~:Ii
:ffB
~
WOOLBRIGHT PLACE P.U.D. f~
aOYNTON aEACll. FLORIOA . _.....)
II"STfRI'LAN ~>~~
TRADEWlNDS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCnoN CORPORATION . ~~/
....
i IP "j ~ =". iiljii ~
i .,11. i ; I! lIiil'.' III
I :. i ;1 I illll= g
I I :-:. ; ...
;; :. I' · !' ; Jo
i r .!; II
. .: I ..
i i . i: : I : e ii .
~I~~I:;;U
:r~~
hr!
d ; I
I:;~ ~ii
I fll!
. i rrl:
ill J t
" ...,. 0 ~'-"':~-=:". " i '.'~ i
;~
: I;;; 5i;;I'.:ii
= sll II
.. ..
i
~
'"
~~
ij
ii
: ~i
'..
!!l
.
;;
..
t.
~)
<1
~
i
~
\
}
~
ID
j
In
lil
~
10
~
...
o
o
+
II:
~
::l
::l
I
I
I
1<
8
::l
o
~
~
~
l;
I\l
~
lii
e
~
z
i
;;
!
i
~:a. ~~
~ ':I :r ::r~
>>,. .. 'Ii ~
+ :;: ::a I I ~!
... b
,'. a
: ,~~ ... ~ ..'
:.-"tt J>~ 1-~
:~o tJ.:t
"~b ~ ~~
;; I .., ... ~
~.. ~3 ~
~.... .. .
:ar-.. ~.
~~ -c. ~
:Q- ~
"< ~ ..
-c:.
E X H I BIT
II E II
I~
un
z I
0
~
-0
:rJ
0
-0
m
~
r-
-
z
m liU
OJ Ii
c:
-n .>> .1
"
m
J:J
-0
>
Z
~
0
bj flfl
:D .., ..;,
-
G> r ., ~
~
"tJ f
~ r f il
-0 !. I
c
c f
q
ii -
--
".
E X H I BIT "D"
1
1
r \
E X H I BIT "0"
E X H I BIT "B"
!II~
ls'l
.I.
I!i
~I
I
'i!'lil
's ;
f
i I
I.. &!
[I ~ i !
I I I
I ~...
: 19
I ~ I
I iliil~I!;lII! ii I
il i!i!liillil,iUi Ii I
,1111 i :nt il
I iil!l!l!lalli .!
h Ii"lltllllll
I i;lh'llllill"II'1
'fl:'. I "II
, 'ill; "1111,
111!:llill!lIIII.11
II . 11.,1 I
" !1111'lllil,ldl.'I
. I" "' II
i lili,I;;I;I; I!
lil,I,01IillI1ldl
h ! 111111'
'0.1111 II II
... "'111 ,
II!il!~IIU I!
"11 '1 I I
" I
!~ I~(V
~fm
. I
:-'"
.. ...
'~""'''~ ;
( . .
"
-:. '\
"
~:~.-;
I~
..J!
%~
."
cl~
1lI~
~-c
is
~
E ~ I
~.
g I
i
I
I
I' f
I~
-
_ -r-"-; ~::i'
.
\-.._.._.._.._u .._.._
I ((r-.----_u_--.
i. III 1.111111.11111
!, I J 11111 III
It" ; I I
! iii I iiiii I iiil! I
-i."''' ~ '." ~--.-o..~. It I, . ~.-; ';U:~
i r II A' ~ ',.; .- --,' ~ ~ j; '.. ~
~ .....
.......
I
I
I
I
., " I
}, i
'f .
'" . 1
...' .., .
J
- I
-:'l I
, ... I i
I , .......... .. I
.' /,: ...... , , I I
. ',- I ..
... ,
I ..... I
.. ~ -
I ~
~
\I
'\I .
I i II I \ ~ I ;
1 : I I t
11~ \ I ~ 1
III .1 I I
.-11 \"
~ I I I
:. l \1, I,
\ 1 I'
\1 \ II "
, \
. \
\ I
.
,
,
,
-c
JJ
.,0
~1J
o
CJJ
m
o
I
't,
I
I
I
I
I
I
\~ i <
~Il/'.
,I .
Y
,
, I
',,-
I '..../
I -
I
I
I
:1
I
I
I
I
~ · III i
! IllS I
I ! III
~ . ,II
'I t'
-. Iii
. II
I I ;Ill
i 1I111111i i'il :
_III It! 1'111111,1 ~
I I II II il :
!1I1. I ! I: II
:'111 U.'5HU Sill: ·
.: I II H~u h :
I'-II ;
II n&li I
I
1'1
-
I' I ;1 i'!J"I'II'lIllll'lIl'lll
11...11"11,,1'11"1"1
1'1' il' Ujlhll' :1.i!I'li Illilll
., III. .111'.1"
I Ii,' !J1j!!III!;I!ih'lljlllt!l!
I,' 1!llllil ~11~;tIII"lldl
P 1111 'llIh1tl'llo'I"I.:1
II 5'1111811111111,'1: lllla:
, · 'IIU JlII';1 I
I ! II ;II!lU!lilil!III~I!":
III ! illi!!!ii!iliiliiiilll!:
I 1'111 ~ I I .,. H . PO I
IE I II i; i I II 1111,111 11111 I
I il I = II I I I I 111. I
I .. I I 11111
. . I. i I i I 1111111,
; ! ! i I ~ I 5 i i I i II iill !
,
...
fA
II
, .1
I .
eiil!rnl &a fi I
ItJ m~
,HUtnll r~ I'
I~~iill ,ill
Jjl~ ~hj
,:~!llii ~l it
II~II,I, 01. I
III
..
I ! E III~
I I I , ;
I'III111 'Ii ! : ! ! h ~
1III '~, ,I, ' t i
I :.. e
,: ~ '~' '\~ ,71"'- " i
i" I ;:. ,\~ '~ I
II. II n'\
II; I \ \'\~~' ---....--
I I(f' ..\~ 'I ' I', I
\\ - : I
Illi I,.:~~,:;' t~' J' I,ll i
1'1 I I .,.', I;I~ 'Iii I'. I
III~I! r')il Ii ,f"I'i\ ' ,', .1- !il!1 11;1~ II 11- ~
I I I. R 'd\ 'I I' ",il~l ~ I I a Ii i
I I I ,( ! I .., , '''Ii ,_ " · 1I I, I' ..
I i I 0 I . I ,r 11'1, l....' '111 'I ~ ,I. III I B
I I I j I " - -' . I ~ 'Pol' R r. il~" l
~ I " ./1 ....:~- -----...:-~ I !;II .. ,I :1, ..
Ili'!f rl,', i;i;F-~JJ ii~ ~ Ii & Iii -.' 1!1, i
: ,\.. '\\11.1 ,III 1'1 ._.~,~.~'. _;.1, I
.Illj i ~ Li-'''JII~-: :L~_~!i?"-T; I ~
'11111 . : j; -r i !' :
~I I I i := I I ·
· ij. fj"':" i! I I ·
"'" .... . ", , ~. g.. I ,I II
, .': \:, "". " . .... ,., .d.1
j!I ~ '0 ~.5I.~TJlPoyt AV' ..::::=c.j
\ ~ \:. ( ....-=..... _..___'04
\~~\ \~~
. \\\ ~\ 'S"\\ P 'IP-
i J - .1'
,& ~'J ,ft .
~I "~'~-' II ',,~ II
; 'I ' , IE j l- .'~(~~~ lit ~
J \ . .~ '" ... tJ.! .
tit"'" , .
I . \ \ '10 ~
.1 ~
I
+.
. \
.. Ii
I.
a,
-
" I
.~ -
I
t
I iii
lit
III
Ia
I!U
III:
,III
,-I
"\
~
..
i
:II
Q
11
~" ............
, ,
. ~
:J
(
,
(
'~ CJ
"
t
t
~
......
N
! " two a L . . , II M' , L A II r' PM'" ,. .
C C L CONSULTANTS JNt
... ~ 0 I V I II II' N. .. ..,.,. II. r... ...Aa.. . ....... ........ .......... -.
: II i I~U hI...... ... ........--
,.... " ! ... ,. S , L R P L " N ...... I-~--. -- .....--,,~ .......- I~t...........-.--.!:.~_.
. _.'_.. .__.____ I""'__._._~____~_.._____~~'_~"'..c.. .~___,....:!!!.~~ "!!,~L_.!.!!!!!!!"---- I.
Mr. Michael Haag
August 2, 1996
Page two
While this letter is trying to identi~ the major ch~ges and p~ints of interest to ~;~ your review,
there may be other changes that will come out dunng the review process. I
As we discussed, Mr. Morton is making a presentation to the County Commission on August 6th,
to show them the proposed changes and how we have reacted to some of their comments. It is
our hope that at this meeting we can get the Commission to acknowfedge, subject to the review
process, that they are at least reasonably in favor of this new concept in order to allow us to
proceed.
At this time it is our hope that by making the submission today that we will be on the August
13th Development Review Committee meeting agenda. Given the history of this project, Mr.
Morton would like to go to City Council on August 20th so that we can proceed to the Planning
Commission on September lOth for approval. .
Thank you for your help on this matter. We look forward to meeting with you in the near future
to discuss the ability of meeting the above schedule. Meanwhile, if you have any questions or
comments please do not hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
CCL Consultants, I~c.
-~?
~~ -----
-
Richard C. Wohlfarth, P .E.
President
RCW/ddp
Encl.
cc: Michael Morton
Tim Kelly
CCl CONSULTANTS, INC.
'.>',)..{}.".
.J
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-396
TO: TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Carrie Parker, City Manager
Bob Eichorst, Public Works Director
Al Newbold, Building Division
William Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Sgt. Marlon Harris, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Chief Field Insp.
Mike Haag, Planning & Zoning Department
Jerzy Lewicki, Planning & Zoning Department
William Hukill, Development Department
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden, AICP
Planning & Zoning Director
DATE: August 6, 1996
SUBJECT: Administration Technical Review Committee Meeting - Tuesday, August
6, 1996.
On August 6, 1996, at 9: 00 A. M., a staff -only meeting to discuss the
submittal below will be held in the 2nd Floor Conference Room, Room 201,
Mangrove Park School.
1. Old Business
None
2. New Business
A. New Site Plan:
1.
PROJECT:
Boynton Commons PUD
LOCATION:
The southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and
Congress Avenue
AGENT:
Land Design South
OWNER:
Bill Ray Winchester, Elsie A.Winchester
DESCRIPTION:
Request for site plan approval to construct a
213,650 square foot retail center including
five (5) leased out parcel buildings on 22.885
acres.
NOTE:
As previously stated in Planning and Zoning
Department Memorandum No. 96-393, written
comments for item Blare to be returned to
the Planning and Zoning Director no later than
5:00 P.M., Tuesday August 13, 1996.
B. Conditional Use Application:
1.
PROJECT:
St. Joseph's Episcopal Church
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-279
(,opt
6. 't f f2P<
11\ ~O<
r'f'- q(,"
,vi ~~D li-
t\
Agenda Memorandum for
May 21, 1996, City Commission Meeting
TO: Carrie Parker
City Manager
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden -rbli
Planning and Zoninimrector
DATE: May 16, 1996
SUBJECT: Woolbright Place PUD - MPMD 96-002
Master Plan Modification (Pod 1 change from multi-family to single-family
units)
The above-referenced item is on the table for the May 21, 1996 City Commission agenda.
Since the last Commission meeting when this was tabled, Mr. Morton has provided the
attached landscape buffer plan in Exhibit 1 in response to comment 34 in Exhibit E. The
plan reflects a significant change in attractiveness, quantity and quality of landscaping,
besides a reduction in width from 25 feet to 10 feet, from the approved plan that resulted
from a settlement agreement between the City and Intervenor Gary Lehnertz, as
documented in Resolution #92-210. To accommodate the late submittal of the proposed
buffer plan, I forward to you the attached substitution of wording for comment 34. A new
Exhibit E (attached) is provided for this purpose and easy reference.
TJH:dim
Attachments
xc: Central File
lI:CCagmcm. Woo
E X H I BIT
.. 111
~~
~ a
-' a
CSl -
::3 . \3""
tS::l ~
Q) -
~
11 ::J
3 ct
to<' \j
1-
& ~
~ ~
::S-\j
~
d C
~ D
Q)
~
r
S'
Q)
--"
Q
~
::3
~
(j)
(')
tl..)
-c:J
Q)
QJ
c
-+:.
-+:.
Q)
-..
~
tl..)
::3
~
I\>
'<
l'J
~
IE'"
Iii!
:Hif
~I"! ~ f
~ ~ ~
~1
-<g'
1,[ -<JJ
f~ I~
ii
~~
H:
'q UI
~
II
.... Q')
.
q ...
"
~
.
q ~
..../j
I :/
,/
~
Cl
~ ~
~ ""a:3
c: ~s
& K):3
~ ~
r ~
J
./
!iT
Ii Jl.
II ,If
f'.
------
J .:-'.
-
.
_. '" '
.....
~
.
"
...
q
i i:..~.i ' C3
.'( ~"~~i Iq ~
..~ I
/ ,". ;':- J
.. \ CI ~
Jj T f I i
I i ~
~
I
-.--.- \~ .
\i
7\]
>~
aa
lUlU
g'
--r-
I
i
I
l
1
.
I
'3
(0
~-
--
Il
~~
.z
1'---
I
I
"'0
]]
o
g
m
o
m
c:
=H
m
:tJ
-0
~
Z
o
"
~
m
z
o
~
"t]
:rJ
o
1:]
m
~
C
z
m
o
"
~
i
~
."
~
m
~
o
REVISED
E X H I BIT
II Ell
':
EXHIBIT "E"
Conditions of A{)proval
Project name: Woolbright Place PUD
File number: MPMD 96-002
. Reference:The submittal consists of a letter si~ned by Michael Morton. dated March 22. 1996 and
three sheets prepared hv CCL Consultants Inc. sheets 1 of 2 and 2 of 2 pre~ared h~ Brett Nehi;
dated March 20. 1996 and sheet 1 of 1 prepared by Louis R. Campanile. Jr _ dated _Qril 8. 199_
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments: NONE
UTILITIES
Comments:
1. Plan shall show existing utilities on or adjacent to the
tract, and the proposed points of connection to the existing
water and sewer mains, (LDR Chapter 3, Art. IV,
Sec.3(O)).
2. The proposed landscape buffer and utility easement on the
north property line will not allow access to a proposed
sanitary sewer force main. Unobstructed access to utility
facilities must be provided. Rerouting of the force main
may be required, (Sec.26.33(a)).
3. The utility easement shown between lots 19 and 20 shall be
a minimum of twenty feet (20') or twice the depth of the
proposed utility pipe which ever is greater, (LDR Chapter
6, Art.IV, Sec.6(A)).
FIRE
Comments: NONE
POLICE
Comments: NONE
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
4. No building structure, screen enclosure, pool, or portion
thereof is allowed within setbacks, either now or in the
future. Chap.l, Art.II,pg.I-30
5. Project shall have underground facilities to residential
units. Chap.2.5, Sec.9E,pg.2.5-7
6. Show the locations of all temporary structures or
permanent structures having a temporary use. Provide a
statement outlining the temporary use and when they will
be removed. Chap.3,Art.IV,Sec.3R,pg.3-5
7. Provide a master stormwater management plan.
Chap.3,Art.IV ,Sec.3T ,pg.3-6
8. Site plan review & approval required. Chap.4,Sec.2,pg.4-1
9. Plat review and approval required.
Chap.5,Art.1I,Sec.l, pg.5-1
10. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and
collector streets. Chap.6,Art.III,Sec.llA,pg.6-3
Page 2 of 9
Conditions of Approval
Woolbright Place PUD
DEPAH.TMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
11. Provide Certification by Developer's Engineer that
drainage plan complies with all City codes & standards.
Chap.6,Art.IV,Sec.5A,pg.6-7 and Chap.23,Art.IIF ,pg.23-8
12. Locate all drainage easements.
Chap.6,Art.IV ,Sec.6B, pg.6-9
13. Minimum street right-of-way width for a local street with 2
mountable curbs is 50 feet not 40 feet as shown; with
swales minimum right-of-way width is 60 feet.
Chap.6,Art.IV,Sec.I0C,pg.6-11
14. Minimum cul-de-sac ROW diameter is 100'.
Chap.6,Art.IV,Sec.I0D,pg.6-12
15. Need SFWMD & LWDD acceptance prior to Engineering
approval. Chap.6,Art. VII,Sec.4B,pg.6-24
16. Applicant's attention is directed to Chap.7,pg.7-1
regarding surety requirements.
17. All landscaped areas shall be provided with an automatic
water supply system. Chap.7.5,Art.II,Sec.5B,pg.7.5-14
18. Provide stop signs and stop bars in accordance with the
"Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices". Chap.23,
Art.I1B2,pg.23-7
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
19. Maximum square footage for entrance wall sign shall be 32
sq. ft.
20. Since the square footage of the lot proposed is closer to an
R-2 zoning, the Building Division suggests that maximum
lot coverage meet the 40% maximum.
21. As to the question whether or not this is a substantial
modification, we will support whatever the other divisions
agree upon.
I)ARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
22. The developer has already received one-half credit for
private recreation. Multi-family unit PODs 2A and 28
already show privatized recreation sufficient to qualify for
one-half credit, but restrict the recreation provided to the
multi-family unit residents only. In order to qualify for
one-half credit for POD 1, the developer is oblillated to
provide a minimum of five basic park requirements
suitable for the future residents of this section.
Page 3 of 9
Conditions of Approval
Woolbright Place PUD
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
23. The following recreation elements are shown on the plan:
1. Pool
2. Sand volleyball court
3. Family picnic area
4. Playground area
5. Health trail
The recreation elements listed above are insufficient to
meet the needs of the single-family units. The Recreation
Department cannot recommend one-half credit for private
recreation provided at this time. The Recreation
Department recommends a minimum 1,300 square feet
meeting hall be added to the recreation elements in lieu of
either the health trail, volleyball court of picnic area in
order to strengthen the recreation package sufficiently for
the department to recommend one-half credit. The health
trail will need to include marked distances so the user will
know how far they have travelled. The trail should be
asphalt or other hard surface.
24. Based on the number of single-family units, the following
additional recreation fees would be applicable if the
developer does not qualify for one-half credit:
85 single-family units X .0180 = 1.530 acres.
Since the developer has already paid one-half of the
recreation fee, he would be responsible for 1.530 divided
by 2 = .765 acres. Fee in lieu of land is recommended.
25. If the final recreation package includes a children's play
area and family picnic area, then additional details would
have to be provided to insure that recreation equipment
would be of commercial quality and of sufficient size to
meet the need of the community.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments:
26. It is recommended that the reduction of the north pun
landscape buffer width from 25 feet wide to 10 feet wide
not be approved.
27. It is recommended that the reduction of the landscape
buffer between POD 1 and POD 2B from 20 feet to 10 feet
wide not be approved.
28. It is recommended that the reduction of the north PUD
buffer from 40 feet wide and 60 feet wide (both) to 15 feet
wide (both) not be approved.
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
29. Place a note on the master plan sheet 1 of 2 and 2 of 2 6~
indicating that the project is subject to conditions
documented ill City of Boynton Beach Resolution No. R95-
65
Page 4 of 9
Conditions of Approval
Woolbright Place PUD
DEPARTMENTS
30.
INCLUDE REJECT
Show on ~'iii~O;:I;2-... (Oh8.t,~ the five (5) foot tall
landscape berm with ficus hedge (located at the highest
point of the berm) that is described in Resolution Number
R95-65 as required along the west property line of the PUD
with the exception of the church parcel. Also, list on the
plan the landscape and berm specificati~ns that are ___
.cl.esc.r!b~~ l!1tb.e re~9Iutlon.; Indlca,te on iIieplantliit the--,
ber9I shall be completed by February 7, 1996. Specify on I
th,e' plan that tile landscape material will be i~rigated and (
"tomply with landscape material specifications listed in the \
t landscape code. "'/:
',./
Considering that the landscape berm~as not completed !
within three months of the date the ;tgreement was
executed (November 7, 1995) as described in Resolution
No. R95-65. It is recommended that permit plans for the
landscaping and berm be submitted to the Building
Division of the Development Department pri9r to
scheduling this request for review by the Planning and
Development Board on April 23, 1996. The permit plan
submitted to the Building Division shall depict the berm
and material consistent with Resolution No. R95-65 and the '
other required landscape specifications identified in
Chapter 7.5, Article II - Landscape Code of the City's
Land Development Regulations.
31.
:\
It is further recommended that the water managemen(area i
(8.64 acres gross) landscaping be completed and accepted i
by the city prior to submittal of a site plan for any further Ii
construction in the PUD 1. Acceptance of the landScaping
will require permit plans to be reviewed by the city. The
permit plans shall be consistent with the landscape
drawings submitted for approval of plat 1 of the: peD~~ ory
equivalent. The installation and final inspection approval
of the material will be considered acceptance of the
lalldscaping'"j
".,/".
On sheet 1 of 2 amend the south border of the Woolbright
Place PUD on the west side of S. W. 8th Street to correctly
identify the property line that separates the Woolbright
Place PUD from the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD as
established by Ordinance 89-18. Ordinance 89-18 is the
ordinance that established the PUD. Rectify the
Woolbright Place PUD plat documents to correspond with
Ordinance 89-18 and rezone to PCD the new configuration
of Morton's Way, unless otherwise determined unnecessary
by the city attorney.
NO
j
)
c,'5-.
v
f
l,:tbt-/I,.I
Page 5 of 9
Conditions of Approval
Woolbright Place PUD
I DEPARTMENTS
32. .J>hl. ~ Jl BEtte Gh t of 2)
indieatiag ~Ilat tile Industrial A~~~;, Road fMuaU)Jl'S
~) sllall be ~o~u'ember 1, 1"7. J'l" . /
AMo add the typical cross section drawing of tile /i':hdp;..J.t;. ~.
nM'tI, as it is depicted in resolution number R9S-6S,
onto the master plan. Add to the drawing the
approved configuration of the pavement for the
Industrial Access Road including the landscaping
and sidewalk referenced in the resolution. If the
location of the three (3) curb cuts proposed for the
south side of road are not known at this time, place
a note on the plan referencing that three curb cuts
<""~~~,~rJlll.g.~~.apd w~l!.i!~, i!1.st~~.le~JtJ.~~!Y. ~!~ndards.
,/Omd the text "ProP9Sed S,W. 81: Str,e~t" ,mt.".\,
l4replace with Existmg S. W. 8th reet./~,"..
33./ With a disti~gl1tshablt"'sy;bi;(shOlVan(l.taeDlify on sheet 1
/ of 2 and 2 of 2 the following required perimeter setbacks:
r 25 feet along the north and west property lines; 20 feet
along the south and east property lines to include the south
and east sides of lots 30 and 31. Also place a note below,.,
the setback charts found on sheet 2 of 2 indicating that the
perimeter setbacks supersede all other setbacks.
I INCLUDE I REJECT I
\/
/,",'
~~----
. ,,\'!--:~II
J ,VI' -I Ie"
-/
Page 6 of 9
Conditions of Approval
Woolbright Place PUD
DEPARTMENTS
"
",
'0
INCLUDE REJECT
" . '.
34.
" ~
FRedtlctlon elf' the width f)t tho hf:lffh pt.JP burf~" from 21 f(St.t
to 10 feet Is not recommended. However, If the Commission
approves the reduction the applicant shall modify the drawing
titled, "Woolbright Place PUD Pod 1 Single Family - North
Property line 10' Landscape Buffer Plan", prepared May 2,
1996 by Basehart & Cottrell, Inc., to show the 10 foot wide
landscape buffer as a 10 foot wide landscape buffer/easement
and show the easement exclusive of the required utility
easements. Show and Identify on the plan, an 18 inch tall
earth berm centered within the ten (10) foot wide landscape
buffer easement. Also, change the overall height of the silver
buttonwood trees from 8' to 10' to 12' to 14', reduce the
spacing from 30 feet centers to 20 foot center to center (trees
shall not be placed on a lot line). It Is further recommended
thnt multi-stemmed 4' to 6' tnll wax myrtle, mytslne or
Florldn privet shrubs be Installed Oil 8 foot centers along the
north side of the two foot tall continuous hedge. Place the
proposed two foot tall continuous hedge and the 8 foot on
center multi-stemmed shrubs on the slope of the eighteen (18)
inch tall berm and place them in an undulating fashion. If the
Commision does not approve the buffer width reduction, the
following sizes, heights, calipers and spacing are recommended
to the added to clarify the buffer plan approved by Resolution
92-210:
.,
\
!
\
.
....
Landscape Size Spacing
Material at Plantilll! of Plants .J!
.... · Live Oak 10-12'ht., 3" caliper, container 50' O.c.
~ r.i
\ '? Gumbo Limbo 10-12'ht., 3" caliper, container 50' O.c. i'
. ....
~~ r.;~' l'
, ~ Slash Pine 10-12'ht., 3" caliper, container '21R O.c. ~,
i. ?'
i Randia' ~ 36-48"ht., 7 gal. container 5-8' o.c.
Myrsine ' - 36-48"ht., 7 gal. container 5-8' O.c.
} Florida Privett 36-48"ht., 7 gal. container 5-8' o.c.
Necklace . 36-48"ht., 7 gal. container 5-8' O.c.
, .
"- 36-48"ht., 7 gal. container 5-8' O.c.
"' Wax Myrtle
"'-
-- J Cocoplum 36-48"ht., 7 gal. container 5-8' O.c.
Lantana 12-18'lht., 1 gal. container 18-24" o.c.
Saw Palmetto 12-18"ht., 1 gal. container 18-24" O.c.
For either buffer approved, specify on the plan the type of
lawn grass within the landscape buffer/easement and
identify the method of installation of the grass. Place a
note on the plan that indicates the landscape material will
be irrigated with an automatic water supply system. All
bedding plants shall be free of grass, weeds, and
topdressed with topsoil and Melaleuca mulch. The bedding
plants shall be maintained in an informal trimming
pattern.
'/
I ~!
\ The landscape buffer/easement shall be dedicated~e/
\ plat to the H.O.A. for maintenance and Jp:!~/'
"~~:~~~~~~~~~.~~~e t~ii~lh~~e~:l{~~~::ed entirely at
once prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy
of any recreation structure or of a residential unit
whichever comes first. )..,:/ ( " if';';.',., H~, i~. ic{
"'f'
/ ,/../~
.- /"
~
'\l
,
.
,) ~,iv
[.....-,.____1
I
.J
, ,<,>..~~r,.
I' /,
IJage 7 of 9
Conditions of Approval
Woolbright Place PUD
DEPARTMENTS
35. On sheet 1 of 2 show the acreage that will be deducted
from the PUD via the reduction in the width of Morton's
Way and the reduction in the church parcel because of the
Incorrect location of the south lot line of the PUD.
Recalculate the site data and L.U.I. data accordingly.
36. On sheet41 of 2 revise site data note B to reflect tHe
......tiv" nf th~ I ",,,~dc~ltlal tfi.tlL., ~~ 1~~~Uf.f lllg which/pod
tlh..J a~lv1.:liIt&d 'WIWn. Tv-<> / 71..I.'f.;...~. (ufl-< /i '.,I,~ r,l'i,"')'
37. On sheet 1 of 2 and 2 of 2 add the term easement to the
areas identified as landscape buffer.
38. On shee11 of 2 list the total L.U.I floor area for the single-
family project and identify the total permitted floor for all
proJeds.,.witbin Jh~lJLJD.'
39.//1 On sheet 1 of 2 reference withil!Ahe area,i.f Pod/l that the
l .,' / '
"'ma'ster-PJan for the pod IS fo~nd on sh~t 2 of ~. /"\
--...__F__-- _-..-._______ ,___-.
40. On sheet 1 of 2 identify the location of the land identified
in the right-of-way licensing agreement referenced in
Resolution R95-65. Also identify on the plan the Palm
Beach County recording data... ,.
41. It is .;~~min,~d~d th~t the 'm~st~; .;ian drawing sheet 2 of
2- haJ~~ typical lot/unit detail drawings that include
dimensioned setbacks for the building, screen enclosures,
pools and easements: The detail drawing shall include a
typical lot, corner lot, perimeter lot and any other special
lots that would require clarity in determining the allowed
setbacks. Include within the typical drawing the location of
proposed or easements of record. Below the drawings
identify the specific lot number that the detail drawing
represents. Ensure that the detail drawings represent all
lots proposed for the development.
42. Specify on the plan sheet 2 of 2 the location of the five (5)
model units that are referenced on the plan or omit them
from the plan. If they are going to be shown on the plan
ide. at th(UJse",oftluunod~' unit~ i..t~f!lporary.
43.{:on sheet 2 of 2)add to the)project s~mmary notes a note /"j
. ,-that identifies each of the proposed r~cr.eatioital~niti~ i
by name., (.' '" " . ,V
44. It is recornmendedthatltfe' maximtJr.:; heiglit ~r'l1i~ ~'fiigle-
family structures be established at 25 feet. This height is
consistent with the height limitation of the homes that are
located to the north in the R-IA (Single-Fatl}..ilY Residential)
zoning district. Amend the site data on she~'2 of 2
accordingJJ; . ."\.....-,
45.'.", Place a note .0n the lJI~ster plan (sheet t of 2) i~dicating ,
'-........,' / ,',
',. that utility service to the units will beun~~rground.
....... ...-'~. ,..~ /". /"'-. ".' ~,
46. Place a note on the"master plan (shee 2 of 2) indicating
,.
that the setbacks for accessory structures and other
building related construction shall comply with the
"
regulations identified in the City of Boynton Beach Code of
Ord,inances.
,_.,
--.
INCLUDE REJECT
.'
C11-
oiL
Cl'/-'
c.-jGZ' '.
I'>,.
i )"t--/."'"
I
1100; 'I 1?Jt ,nJ,J,;;;:c.. 'cf, k/
'It,,;! /1)f/ --;.,' )/i,.....;. Deft .A,
'", "'1.71'" f Ii .. __, r '4
J2.sr f~J. b ,.~. t....' ,t: /~)
~ Qp...-f
Co ,e..
/") //:/01
(/' ~ '
/'
&/c
(j/t../
Page 8 of 9
Conditions of Approval
Woolbright Place PUD
'.j
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
47. Omit the text "(interior)" and "building separation"
from the minimum building setback chart found on .~ :..--
(fJi
sheet 2 of 2.
48. Omit the text "(interior)" from the minimum screen &
enclosure setback chart found on sheet 2 of 2.
49. Omit the text "(interior)" from the minimum pool and spa 1':-'
setback chart found on sheet 2 of 2. Also identify 15 feet ~{l
as the front setback for pools.
50. Within the setback charts Identify the lot numbers that & 1'-'
represent corner lots.
51. Omit general note #9 found on sheet 2 of 2 and add the ,
:;
same note to proj ect summary note #7.
On she~1'2 of 2 identify the front of all corner lots. ", V
-'
52. " .
53. Place a note on sheet 2 of 2 indicating the buffer ,,-.-'''' ,
specifications for the south and east buffer or described on , .
sheet 1 of 1.
54. Amend the project summary note #7 found on sheet 2 of 2
as follows:
/\ (""',!) /
Minimum lot size: 42' X 100' (4,200 square feet) j.1.nJ
' .
Minimum lot frontage 42''''
... frontage measured at 15 foot front setback line for
th~ f(}lIowing irregular shaped lots; 2-6, 18-2' and
(:~0-46:) .....-'
55. Amend the project summary note #5 found on sheet 2 of 2
by removing the text "Approximately 4.42 acres." and /,~I--/
replace with the "minimum floor area per unit is 1,784 U
square feet and 2,880 square feet is the maximum floor
area per unit".
56. Modify project summary note #1 found on sheet 2 of 2 to ~1
{-.
correctly identify the total gross area of the project.
57. To properly determine the number of parking spaces that
are required to support the recreation facility, the total
floor area of the cabana and the total water area of the
pool is needed. The total surface area of another amenity {!;JL
constructed on improved surface is needed to determine the
number of parking spaces that are required to support the
amenity. Show on sheet 2 of 2 the total number of parking
spaces consistent of the regulations listed in Section
1l.H.16.e. of Chapter 2 - Zoning of the City's Land
Development Regulations. Also show the computations
used to determine the number of required spaces on the
sheet.
~
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-192
/\\ft
'7 \
A -o-
ft (p~ qVO
~i tAyl'1D
~r.-
Agenda Memorandum for
April 16, 1996 City Commission Meeting
TO: Carrie Parker
City Manager
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden -;9;;1-
Planning and Zoning {)i~ector
DATE: April 10, 1996
SURJECT: Woolbright Place PUD - Master Plan Modification
File No. 96-002
Please place the above-referenced request on the April 16, 1996 City Commission agenda
for Commission action under Development Plans.
NATURE OF REOUEST
Michael Morton, agent for Howard Scharlin trustee/property owner of the Woolbright
Place PUD, is requesting approval to modify the previously approved master plan for
the Woolbright Place PUD (see Exhibit "A" - letter of request and proposed master
plan). The requested modifications are limited to that portion of the PUD tilat is
entitled Pod 1. Pod 1 is a 14.i!i5 acre parcel which is located on the east side of
Southwest 8th Street and is approximately 2~ feet north of Woolbright Road (see
Exhibit "8" - location map). The changes are as follows:
(,-'
I. Change the type of units in Pod I from 90 multi-family units to ~ single-family,
detached units. The following building and site regulations are proposed for Pod
1:
North property line
East property line
South property line
West property line
Perimeter setbacks; perimeter setbacks supersede all other previous setbacks:
,-,I()
reduction from 60 feet to ~ feet
20 feet
}~'feet . ;;. . ,.. ! ;....,',. ,--:-
reduction from 40 to 16' feet with the exception
of 25:.feef setbaCk forreeFeatio.n..stes
42 feet
..4,200squareIeet
15 feet
Minimum lot width
Minimum lot area
Minimum front yard
Minimum front yard
(to garage)
Minimum rear yard
Minimum side yard
(interior)
Minimum side yard
(corner)
Minimum living area
(FAR)
Maximum building
height
20 feet
15 feet (i
~.~
6 feet
2O-feet
1,784 squarei'm
4S.~feet
Page 2
Woolbright Place PUD
Master Plan Modification
Memorandum No. 96-192
File No. 96-002
Screen enclosure (screen roof) setbacks:
Front 15 feet \
Rear 8 feet ( , ;,/ !- u loi"
Side (interior) 6 feet
Side (corner) 20 feet
Pool and Spa setbacks:
Front none specified
Rear ll6IIe'speclftett
Rear (corner) 10 feet
Side (interior) 8 feet
Side (corner) none specified
2. Provide 32 guest parking spaces.
3. Reduce the width of the north buffer from 25 feet to 10 feet and omit the berm
and landscape material. No plans have been submitted to show a profile view of
the proposed buffer or to identify the specie, size, spacing or quantity of
landscape material (see Exhibit "c" - approved planting plan).
4. Omit the 25 foot wide landscape buffer along the west property line.
5. Propose project signage at the entrance on Southwest 8th Street.
6. Propose an optional wall or rail fence along the Southwest 8th Street frontage of
the project.
7. Provide private recreation on Pod 1 to serve Pod 1. A twenty-five (25) foot
setback is proposed for the structures proposed within the recreation area.
8.
Reduction in the width of Morton's Way from 80 feet to 50 feet.
~..'~
j/;;t...'"
BACKGROUND
The Woolbright Place PUD consists of 81.1163 acres and is approved for a total of 656
units (16 duplex units and 640 multi-family units). The 656 units equal a density of 8.08
dwelling units per acre for the entire PUD.
Pod 1 is master plan approved for 90 multi-family units and was split-off as a separate
residential parcel within the pun when 548 of the multi-family units within the pun
were subdivided for the "The Vinings at Boynton Beach" project. The Vinings was
further subdivided into two (2) phases. Phase One (1) was platted on February 21, 1996
and construction is underway. The latest approved master plan for the Woolbright
Place PUD is shown in the attached Exhibit "D".
Chapter 2.5, Planned Unit Development, of the City's Land Development Regulations
states that changes in Planned Unit Developments shall be processed as follows:
Section 12. Changes in plans.
"Changes in plans approved as part of the zoning to PUD may be permitted by
the Planning and Zoning Board upon application filed by the developer or his
successors in interest, prior to the expiration of the PUD classification, but only
[after] a finding that any such change or changes are in accord with all
regulations in effect when the change or changes are requested and the intent and
purpose of the comprehensive plan in effect at the time of the proposed change.
Page 3
Woolbright Place pun
Master Plan Modification
Memorandum No. 96-192
File No. 96-002
Substantial changes shall be proposed as for a new application of PUD zoning.
The determination of what constitutes a substantial change shall be within the
sole discretion of the City Commission. Non-substantial changes as determined
by the City Commission on plans shall not extend the expiration of the eighteen
(18) month approval for the PUD classification."
Also, pursuant to Resolution No. R95-65, which sets forth an expedited review of
development applications submitted to the City by the property owner, the special
schedule established by staff and the applicant for processing this request is as follows:
March 22, 1996 - Application/plans received.
March 22, 1996 - Plans distributed to the Technical Review Committee (TRC).
Written comments due to the Planning and Zoning
Department at the end or the day of April 4, 1996 for
preparation of staff report to commission.
April 9, 1996 - TRC meeting held.
(Note: The expedited process does not require resubmittal
by the applicant. Therefore, regardless of the condition of a
first submittal, staff must forward the request. The only
exception to this would be resubmittal voluntarily by the
applicant. The applicant did not choose to resubmit this
request to address some of the more major issues raised by
staff. )
April 16, 1996 -
City Commission meeting.
April 23, 1996 -
Special Planning and Development Board meeting (a special,
earlier Planning and Development Board meeting was desired
by the applicant).
May 7, 1996
City Commission meeting, if deemed necessary by the city
attorney.
ANALYSIS
Staff has reviewed this request for consistency with the PUD development standards,
and the intent and purpose of Planned Unit Developments as stated in the following
sections of Chapter 2.5 of the City's Land Development Regulations:
Section 1.
Intent and purpose
"A Planned Unit Development District (PUD) is established. It is intended that
this district by utilized to promote efficient and economical land use, improved
amenities, appropriate and harmonious variety in physical development, creative
design, improved living environment, orderly and economical development in the
City and the protection of adjacent and existing and future City development.
The district is suitable for development, redevelopment and conservation of land,
water and other resources of the City.
Regulations for Planned Unit Developments are intended to accomplish the
purposes of zoning, subdivision regulations and other applicable City regulations
to the same degree that they are intended to control development on a lot-by-Iot
Page 4
Woolbright Place PUD
Master Plan Modification
Memorandum No. 96-192
File No. 96-002
basis. In view of the substantial public advantages of Planned Unit Development,
it is the intent of PUD regulations to promote and encourage development in this
form where tracts suitable in size, location and character for the uses and
structures proposed are to be planned and developed as unified and coordinated
units.
Section 9.
Internal PUD standards
B. INTERNAL LOTS AND FRONTAGE. Within the boundaries of the PUD,
no minimum lot size or minimum, yards shall be required; provided, however,
that PUD frontage on dedicated public roads shall observe front yard
requirements in accordance with the zoning district the PUD use most closely
resembles and that peripheral yards abutting other zoning districts shall be the
same as required in the abutting zone."
With respect to the changes requested;
1. The change from 90 multi-family units to 8S single-family units creates a
reduction of seven (1) units. The gross density for the 14.~ acres in Pod 1
would reduce from 6.36 to 6A9-units per acre. With the change of type of units
there is also a change in trips generated. The proposed change will increase the
trips for Pod 1 from 630 total trips generated by the multi-family use [90 (multi-
family units) x 7 (trips per unit) = 630 total trips] to 850 total trips generated by
the proposed single-family detached units [8j"(single-family) x 10 (trips per unit
= 8$0 total trips]. Staff accepts the change in type of units, however, the impact
of the increase in the total number of trips generated (630 to 850) has not been
analyzed by the applicant, as is required. The increase in trips could be
justified by omitting the 16 duplex units (112 trips) within Pod 3 and reducing the
proposed 85 single-family units to 74 units (740 trips). Therefore, the 74 single-
family detached units (740 trips) would not generate an increase in trips for the
PUD due to the total of 630 trips for the multi-family units and the 112 trips for
the duplex units.
Omitting the duplex units from Pod 3 would require the master plan to reflect
the new use and the unit total in Pod 1 to be changed to reflect the reduction in
units. To ensure complete development of the PUD located on the east side of
Southwest 8th Street the property owner of Pod 3 should be required to submit a
site plan showing landscaping in the new open space area. It is recommended
that the site plan for this area be processed with the site plan for POD 1.
Regarding the proposed building and site regulations and perimeter setbacks,
these issues are addressed in detail in Planning and Zoning Department comments
included in Exhibit "E" - Conditions of Approval. In general, the only perimeter
setback not complying with the zoning code is the setback along Southwest 8th
Street. However, the applicant has agreed to change the proposed setback from
20 feet to 25 feet. As previously indicated in this report, the PUD frontage on
dedicated public roads shall observe front yard requirements in accordance with
the zoning district the PUD use most closely resembles. The adjacent zoning
district is R-IA (Single-Family Residential) and is the district the proposed
development most closely resembles. The front yard requirement for the R-IA
zoning district is 25 feet and considering the lots in the proposed development are
double frontage lots they are required to observe front setback requirements
along both frontages. Planning and Zoning Department comments include other
setback and building height recommendations that staff believes are in the best
interest of the adjacent neighborhood and the residents of the development.
Page 5
Woolbright Place PUD
Master Plan Modification
Memorandum No. 96-192
File No. 96-002
2. Regarding the thirty-two (32) guest parking spaces, staff finds this to be
acceptable subject to the parking areu being processed as a new site plan. The
parking areas shall comply with the landscape code regulations regarding vehicle
use area screening and the layout of the parking area shall comply with the back-
up space distance, curbing, lighting and pavement striping regulations of the
parking lot code.
3. The request to omit the berm and landscape material and reduce the width of the
landscape buffer along the north PUD boundary reflects a deviation from the
size, configuration and quality of material established as part of an executed
stipulated settlement agreement between the City of Boynton Beach and
Intervenor Gary Lehnertz, which was resolved by Resolution #92-210. The
approved landscape buffer is illustrated in Exhibit "C". Since degree of
screening was not the only Issue that revolved around resolution of the buffer
design, staff recommends that if the buffer is reduced in width that the quantity
and type of material previously approved still be required and that the five (5)
foot tall berm be replaced with a two (2) foot tall berm (centered in the new
buffer). As a point of information, it continues to be staff's position that buffers
are intended to not only provide a visual separation, but a physical space
separation. Since this buffer is platted as an easement, reduction of its width
would further diminish its purpose, since it can be used to meet the minimum lot
area of lots which back up to it. The landscape material shall be located in a
landscape easement and the easement dedication would place the responsibility of
maintenance of the landscape material and irrigation on to the homeowners'
association. It is recommended that this north buffer not be installed on a lot by
lot basis but be installed entirely at once prior to a Certificate of Occupancy for
the recreation or a unit, whichever comes first.
4. In regards to the omission of the twenty-five (25) foot wide landscape buffer
along Southwest 8th Street, staff recommends that a ten (10) foot wide landscape
buffer easement and a two (2) foot tall berm (centered in the new landscape
buffer easement) be shown on the master plan along the entire Southwest 8th
Street frontage of the proposed project and that landscape material be installed
in the easement. Staff further recommends that the landscaping either match the
landscape scheme of the adjacent PUD property to the south or a landscape plan
be submitted that would include landscape material equal to the total count of
trees and hedges/shrubs approved for the frontage of the adjacent project. The
landscape material would be located in a landscape easement and the easement
dedication would place the responsibility of maintenance of the landscape
material and irrigation on to the homeowner's association.
5. With regards to the signage at the project entrance, optional wall or rail fence
and private recreation area, staff finds them to be acceptable subject to the staff
comments listed in the attached Conditions of Approval and approval of a future
site plan review request submitted by the developer.
6. The reduction in the width of Morton's Way from eighty (80) feet to fifty (50)
feet was recently approved as part of Resolution No. R95-65 - Tradewinds
Settlement Document.
RECOMMENDATION
On Tuesday April 9, 1996, the Technical Review Committee (TRC) met to review the
Page 6
Woolbright Place PUD
Master Plan Modification
Memorandum No. 96-192
File No. 96-002
requested master plan modification. The TRC recommends that the City Commission
make a finding of no substantial change. It is further recommended that the
Commission forward this request to the Planning and Development Board for
consideration of and action on the attached conditions of approval in Exhibit "E". It Is
advised to have the Commission also make a recommendation to the Planning and
Development Board regarding the attached conditions, especially comment 61 regarding
reduction In POD 1 and POD 3 units that is discussed on page 4 of this report, as this
comment was generated in response to no traffic analysis being submitted. The
Commission would have the option of tabling this request until the traffic analysis is
submitted.
TJH:meh:dim
xc: Central File
a:WOOLPLAC.MPM
E X H I BIT
.. A II
/ 24' 48
/:f 2;:,' 06 FlU 1 6 : 08 F.H 1 407 ,
NORTON GRUII!'
IgJ002
Rul. ESUTlINYIITMINTI . GINIRAL CONTAAcrou
0011 CI.INT MoolIl: ROAD, SUITI 114
BOCA RUON. FLORIDA 33487
PHON.: 407.884.1188 . FAX: 407-141-0848
March 22, 1996
Via Faalmlle: (407) 37s-6090
Mr. Mike HaiS
Current Planning Coordinator
Planning & ZoniD8 Department
City of Boynton BeBcll. FL
RE: Woolbright Plaee P.U.D.
Ma.ter PlaD Revlllo..
Dear Mr. Haig:
Pursuant to our telephone conversation I will attempt to ou1Jinc the changes being
requested in our Master Plan submission.
1) Change in the approved mastcr plan from a remainder unit count of(92)
multi-family units as approved, to (8S) single-family lots. approximately 42'..()
x 100' minimual size with provisions for screen and pool or spa facilities.
This community will have private recreational facilities as per code.
1) The north property line landscape buffer, between Lake Boynton Estates and
the P.U.O., to be changed from 2S'..() to 10'-0. This is based upon the change
from multi-family' against single-family units to single-family against single-
family units.
J) The multi-famHy building set back line along the north property line changes
from 60'-0 to 25'-0, for single family. .
4) The building set back line along the west property line (S.W.8th St.) is being
changed from, 40'-0 multi-family set back. to, 20'~O single-family set back,
and along the recreational area, a 25'-0 building set back Jine,
S) Final adjustment wfll be made in the building envelope for pool and spa lots.
1 trust that I have covered the important points.
Cordially,
~~
Michael Morton
cc: Mr. Brett Nefn, eeL Consultants, Inc.
Ms Anna Cottrell, Basehart &. Cottrell
';F:..;......1:
"~I
:,--, t?
,~ ' ! r~ .
r!~ I
I'Wlf' I . i : I
dUll'lil - ~ l. ~, I
IHljll ~- "-~, ~ ~ i Hi !~~g~j
, H~,) ':rr" ~ ~. W ,~:~c . ,
" h . i : ;;; ~-. m.
I~ I, ~ '; ~ en \. , m.. r ~ L
~"IJ ~\~~-/~. '" ~I H~I~: ~~.
~~' In, ~---<o.~o ~~...:;o:.'-~"~=' i'~_~ .::-.-;
" I ~ ' . 1\ :
!: ! ' \\.:\ l' i ;, I
.,1 I .c' 'e - . I
~.!! i.t ;; 'i'l'f? Iii! ~~! ~j ~ I
g~_ I ;~; rl .(fl'l; a 1~~
, ;; 1 'I I~ IIII:! ,r _ I ,~, ,I"
1"~I'll." ~,j ~l* f 'III .i; .ig ,b"I'
, J I : -.. . !J'I .~ J ~ ; !;
~. ~ I . 'i " . - "I' 1;'1 . ; 1\; ,I
'. "1,1 -. ) I' c5','. ! ~:!I ! "
r 'r--'''-~ "':):f i .11 !~
' r, 1 ,J I r - . -,' :) ~ r" , hi - ~
Ii'. III 1/1: j-' ~"l ~J ~ j
I~I L.L.JL i; 'I ~fl: i ~~ .~ -' ~ o:i ~I."
;: . r - ~ -: s.: 1.___,./ ' ~1;~
I.., j r I.~_~ ~ I;,;
,. , - - -. - , (, I,
.~ ,I I ~ ~; ~ ~ ~
f" - :/ :~, I . ; i
o _ m & I
.-". · Ir~~' i [,: T.;ll Q
l~ ! I i IL . t ~ P
\ I II .. Et ! ~ I
,i ~; ~'~~'.~i H ! B
. - ; I ", It, / ,
: ~~ ~ ' ~~ =zS:....=i:-:: ~-; .~_ o-"""=--~'
, . ~-=--l" -=--IA.RRT~N S..WAV---'. --
':z. ' : ( .w , . --
~o '~ V. \
"~n '\ ..: .~ .
'\ \ y;
i '\~'1.~~.d
I
I
i'r i".III,,,,,,qllj"'/"III"'I'II',"I"
I I 1 'J i" 11111 i! :1' ;1' : ,. :(. 1110' '.I:':~
1I,II'.I,'I"llil"'/'II'I,':'I'IIII'
l,!!;lll!!IWliil/j1Il!i!J!!,I!i!l!iii!l!i
/1'11111/111,1,,1.' 11"111/111'1'1'1
,'llI:i lll!I:lllh1i,I..:'II:!I,I.jlj':
I!' lillH!IlI'II!:i!11!!liFI!li!!I!:I:!;
!II ;:II1I'I!I,'ili!!I!lllllh,,'!j!!I,'lilr,
II, ..,("111''''.111,1'1,,,,1,'' '1'1
,I . f Ili'p', "."
II, !lll!!!!!!1llll:lii!:I!:!1!li!!!I!iit
;-0
i:D
10
Ig
.m
,0
i~
)>
,en
'-I
'm
1:0
1-0
:~
Iz
I
ml: H:I i!iIf !f~J ifiB m~ if!,: ·
::f" "1 ....& u..l : 'I if" :r: !
'i . ,. I f"'~1 ~. r ,: nl. f': I
i:.i il.: ~J'i: i~I(: iJii ~lil ~~II .
ill ~!I d:",' d ('J; ;, 'f' ~ ~i 5
,'1 :, ", or: J" '." " .
g. 'rl (: ;: -If f~~ g
:i:! i :i I", -:. .
t,:i -. ~ ! i :
i i f ~,' .
E " i 'I
j I
i
I '
Illl~a I~
II :.. . I
ill'" 11 I
I~ II~ I;
lI'l~ I ~
. I,:. :
H!13. I
I h,
H;5 I'
. -'
;~J
\
\
\
~
H
2.
8:
;;
i:
H
I) J:~
, '" :5
.
itJ~
'Ulll'lllllIIIIII'rl r
'rl','l"" I, II
!li~l!iil!!!!1 !Iili
111"111'1"11,'1111
l'I,III"l!I':1 h'l
1"I,llfulll'II,'
111!U:I'j!!II' h'l'
,1,1111,.11.111,1,'
,II '1,III.jl,., I
.j'lilll.II,.lljl'l
.:!!irM!il!l!! !1!ll
\
"
,
I
J
~I{ l
,
~f
?
._~-- .~
- .-, L eO"'IILU"" "..' E~-l-~----~~:~!!l
_. ..~~~~.~~:-~=::.. '.'~~;:~:';~~'~':~{2;~~~.~~-:;~~~~ig
" 1:;.':. ,...
'I:;!li E
! ..;.:1 J,
I i Ii;~ 0
a .:. I 0
. . -. . 0
i I;C ! ~
I ~
, '"
5 n Il . I 1151 ~
n : i ! 5 '"
'f ..
.. tF I:, I ~
:. i I i
.. i I IIi!
H
n . 1111
~ c Hi = I II
, . .
. .. I . . .
u .. pi III ~
II
J ; " - nn
~ .
. EI
. :
. . e.
~ ~
.
.
. : :!
f : : J=
i . .. '
~ ::~
!
~
~
1Il
..
J 2
~ i
~ '"
~
i
'"
!jl
~
~
"
o
o
\ h r II
! ., o.
j, "
~. " ;.;
!, . .
~ ~ ! ~ woo l I " I C H 1 , t . C [ ".u.al
'. g' '1
,. t.. 'I. ....,..s,.... '1 '.t....
" . ---- __J~
:~ ' .. . S , r. . l . .. \",,<P&..A!
~-_._---_._---- -'_. _ -___.___1fIIJ :'I'Jft! _._'___~_ ..
+
v.
r.
r
::J
o
e
:D
o
:E
;;;
;;
t~
r
:;
Q
..,
~
~
:;
n
o
;-
::l
r
:;
:D
:::
;:J
()
..
o
:J
:;;
+
'tw'
;J,.
~! I i
,1"'
!l~
1'1
lj
,
:, :3
I'i l:a.
;:j Ii!
!: ~
Ii Ii
I ...
14" I
III ..
,'I ~ ..
II ~ ~
; .. ~
! i ~ ~
I i ~
i I ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
!
,
~'1J l'fuIIIUII,' "Il:;
':0 ,1~!J~: ="f: 'I ~
10 I :~f!'!hi!!:, !j I~
I". \. ,1'11'11; f. r;
i il':'l ii.1I1 '1/ ~
o 1"I"j'IIIII' i
,^ II" II"" I
WI I J~'" .11 h
m . !1'llil'!:~1111I
O 11'1,. ,1111',.
, li':l11I'1I1 I
3: I .1'1!;ill..11
_ I CI!~ :~!lll~! PI
'" 'ull!11 ,1111
en · In' .!j'lllll ,1
rrt ~ i1tl!I'!::';! II
:0 I lim:lil'li'!
" .Ii:m:ll,lh II
r hrl"~' ., f'
)> Iilf'!.ii!Jit .:
z 1~"I,II;I~1 II
t , ..II .1
1.1I'@ t' =1 1
;; I I I
I ~ 1
. '. ~.@,
I . l< ~
I: '
IW~:~
I. .
, ,. ., I
" l,'i i i i i ',lljlij i~~ Ii
'(11-/11'1 . ~
'I d II!. , I.. i ",
I 11111'111. "
I, I 111,1:, .
, ~: " t
I !! 11 '
I I IIi
-I
~.J
:-J
"'"I ';'.
- " 1. ....
. " J
I '
r::. l. .( l' .1,' "
IIJ)/l Q:;
!
....
",
.
..
"
"
I I
I
',-
."....,
'. ..., <,:.., ,
, ,
I '
,~: .
. ( '4
/'
.. s .
., ,
,.-4~'
;:..-, ,
:;: (.
d J .
'"
ii' _ i
r-------..-- -..-..-'
:1. ;' 1 ;
I~ ~:
l..:
t_-.
w_a'll
...
I
I
.......... .....,~ ~
1'..... ,
....
, 'e",'
i I..... .......,:
;' I
....
-<
"tJ
n
~
~
!~
I~
,-
~
o
o
,.,
~
!~
'"
:u
o
:IE
!~ !,l
- ~...
I~ f J-u
t' .
- ~ ~. ~:: . . --'S"
i~ ;:.: I b~ ! I ~
.. l.;.!cl ..~ J I I
'" tL-____.~~_' _.._..~ I I
:! "' ~,il- i iJUUl;Hi~
'I:i 111:iliIlJ=P5i
~h I, 'I'; il i,- f
!:~ Ilh!s s~!' I
~I! i ~I!~!! i J
d I · .Ii i i ,I
tt~ ~ ;IE. '. i ,i Ii
-5 H~ R ~ ~ ·
! ~.',. I '1
. h. ~ ~ I '
~ r~;; it
;: ,. ,. ~.
""-
"
.
..
~~... ,. / ,l....... .......
...... J... ... .......;
!!H J!B,ii ;i i :
US s,. I ~ ig ~ ~
,~I I' Illi~ ~
i;i I I ~ ..
III1 E! :
I:~:i H' gii ~ if! :
t'l"at U~ HRR A. - :
.i 51 Ii i
II ,. Ii":;" I
-i :.~
f. t~t P!Hi I-fl tii !
__ ! !I' II i IU) R III IS - I
Ii I '- .! I
...... !.) .! -. I
Y . !! .
1 . 0 ~
- . ~ =
I;.. __ ~.._ ~
;0-';;' ..... '" ....;~~ "
~!l"i = ai!=:I~ = ~=Z;~;;;:: III
9 - --=:~:~!: ~~~
n
~
~ ~ f ! ,f "'" 0 C l i. t c ,..', D l .a C r P,U.O I_~
I:~;; ~__~'~~~~_s '" 10 'N to.. i:~j
to, .. .
I .. v " ~ , (J;' P l ... N J"'IIInli!'.."lPl....
_ ~.,. u/!"",
m- c ~ L CONSULTANTS .IN~-+---- i
__~rt.::~';, ~.::;:::::. '~~._::'~..~;~~l}t.~~~~~~~~~
E X H I BIT
.. B II
LOCATION MA~
WOOLBRIGHT PLACE P.U.D.
POD 1
_I \ I r II.lft :ClUJ r v- .... '--..: '1'1'1~ r-- --1.\ 1/'." r-Jt UL.kf::
m~-~~~/. ~f : 'Vri"'rit~~ ~~~ . - -= i I · ~ . tI~
-. ~ - - I C _. fiT1r
: [ . - '.. ~. . ~ HL . : I WI ~. II
'. .-' -...-....... - - A; Ill/II'
pee _.:. ~"f'l I r ![lllllI~(:l~' RP ~ I rx.~~".
NC'~ /70'V 6EA,C~. ...-., r;, ~. _ ~ ~ q,'1
I . r [ ~I' rrrrrrrnr I . _ I ! . ..--.,
-l~.o~..~L 1"' \ 1~ 1v'..: ~ ~:J.J'II Tn ~ r.:o, 1; ru~Ij","I'''Hrr) I : r-
I ~ /.J: ~~ ~"- :nut nn II I' '" 1111 W: ~ .. ! I ; 1/ ! : ::> ;;;J I ~ \I 1,Jt; ~... - I
I' - -:- - ~tdJ ',' II"~~ r!lI~l~ ;uJIlI.J~IJTI"
~tR;jf~l ,,8, ~l t.\~~!.!-~~~~~& ~l~B[H~J.I;i:
~ c- ~ ~s -E C "~" · __..~~ e r.:'!!!!!JJJ fO--L1U - -!J,I!\!! I ~ >- 1- j 'TTiD ,1
17 I ',.". - L ,-\ ) (li'll"~ J!IIl!I!D IlIIIIIIIIiIIl*r~ 'I'T~ '.' I ,I 1 : , j I . .
". '- ...:~ ,-, ,.r,"-"f..... "'"'1 U!J1~ I I:: ,.---..., · j t/ llj m. . , I 'i- ' , '
11:-] UJ . :J '!Jdf W' T r' L.--l i I ::::::: .! ~ 1 '1]T.l
j. I T ~ lOt .'. ,: ~ ~ f; j ,=- -+- ~.. ~~!1Ii1l1rJ!m ~~~~~~~ f- ""I Ii -j' ~L: ; " I
I l f-. I'-~ I I -.T-. nHl~~ .:.:.:.- 1. ~.' 11
. .' -'..I ""'.?M ,CJII :- 'r .;-' J;: ,-.. /.Ii', j I " W m. ~ -I TR.VU.~k;
=I-=: C ~ IfilL':' ,~.;-... .~- ~J f("- l~ :; . ::::::::~ s;:;:;: I:J'':T~ . -tJ~~1 .
.' . l.f.-.t--lCn ' . H: t 1:1 ~IPJt'1~11-1 IBI :'.:". ~~~~~~~~~~~~~:~~~~~~~ ~ 'i 1 b["
1""1~rl ~ r., L:I_ IJ ... Is ..................... Ii [' I
-j . '" I 1 A''''' (.-,. r ... . , J 1'S: . :.:.:.:.:;:.:.:.:.:.:. .
~ ~' - ~ ~ ,. .r I' I L ::: . :::::::::::::::::::::: I' ; .
r 1;,.. . .............. ...... -. I r " I ..~.
- . lr~' 1 r r ':.:':'1,. ........................:.....:. I r.'-......
/" \ \ , · .....b 1 ~. :1:-:':" '. : .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: , ,I.. , I
~I - -: \.- ' :..:::::::.... :. . . '. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 111 -- t" ....... . ,.
~ rl~ "-: \ ~ ,,~ . "~.. '\ ~ ;,~~ ..::::::., ..: :.:::::::::::::: '::: '.:.' :::::::::::::::: ffiUJIj I
: ~ { .)\ ~ f"~...., '. ~,.,~ .~ --.." ::~;~~~:H:~:::::::::;:::..'..:.:::",~:.,,, ..:.::::::::::::: . f.;.... ..
~. . . )1" " '.' . ~~. " .';0:-;0;.. ..'E:~ft~lI :::::: 1-. ..,
,.//:;/ 'i~~'~~\~~ _') , "!Itit~ ~ ~[EIl]M:I'I[t
~ ..' .; ( .' . ";1T" ",,,, /' :::::::: .::: .' .' .t:;:c:s. .' .::. .::::::::: ,1:: ~ r "'. " :
3
I ('...... I )....~.. ,/. ." .' , 1fT ~ '=::::::::::::::::::::::::: . :':Ae :.:.:::=:::=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:= ,oJ . ~_. 1.1.1. :~~... 'I ......1
11 ... i ~ \ If" ............... II . II ............... t
,..~, ....,.:~,. " /7', ...."\., '\ '. '.' ':::::::::::::::::::::::~:~::::::::::::::::::Z;~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::~::::. ~I ~lllJ~lr~T"~JII, ::..
) ':/'/' '.: '. -. 16:' .,:~. \\ \ ~\'~'~" \ .::;:;:;:;:;:~:;:;:;:;~l.~;;~ ~. - .,. :':'
. .' ~. . . . , . , ~ \\ '. ~. '::::::::::::::::::::::: -', C( I r'
' " I' ! \. "'t' . :::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.~ lal I' '
o '...1, . . ,. ....................... . ,I.
r t'. ,4" . R 3 .. " . I \. ":':.:':':':':0:':.:,:, : p U'
. '.'\ni'li1njC; ;~...r~:i ~J) \\~(" ", ... \ '" I ~.t'11 : i~
\ II," I~. , Il ~...., J , ... .......- " :
1 ,. .~... .l~. .'Av"(.. , , .. '_.' ...
~ ,;;: ,lnR~C . 1.......- ; . ) -:--L. '"
~ . tl,! '. ;~t.l ~ ,I]J . U-ri~. 11 rT:.' :.l -.~:~~'~~~.\ ..:.- ~ J.. _~---.ll, ~ ~~-: __. ~.-"C:. .-..:..,
I - '\. vv. vv I) ~. ""J:U I ~ r:> . 'T, .
rn;'~'R;; . j--'~Y:==--[;:--= /'n\ "'y/ . r:lf
I' i ".j151f.f~JI 'flllt;~/';v. 'W.'JIJFJ~Wi~~~~ ,,-// C~:O / I f~ C.= _
. ' . ~ . ,11 wI'" 116 .I!)/L. /!f ~L~" ,
· '-n ',7 , \....~ ~ -l!f: ~ ~ lr
,'<':~ 1 . )L~EC ~~\" i>:'\~ .~y~ { -11ii=j ------1) R Ii 1. J I R~' .
fl.jtTIIItn=~ ~<%J. ~'_." ~~, ..1-.-.. 1;:-11 l;o'j':'
\ ~}~ . :. \''''- ~, f.. 7 ~---=- ... E: p';J~.1 J
". ~..~.. ,:1 v'." . :r-- -.,' '/... l.UIJ7_D...,n . .....
. ~-<~'~T '~<;~., <0'.. . ') :L. -1.: 1 /_
. v...., ~!f)'"~'" /, \')', /"-, .... ..
I r:':;(7'/(l~' . \, ~1;_ U'l ([~: V ~ ~_~ "L:
JtJ .,r r . -. <L(- "~~~~J~J1 U~Ef'l~'P:~.$;JjJ,",-
- JILl I L: ~:. L U \ \ ','" P. . ' /~ r\.'\ 6:~ Y."
.." I .;.1'.' .'~b I I I II ,.r-T~l.. ~' MILESV I "l .;,1.1,
, '/~ . ,', \ i :'/ ;1.'.1 r,l ;,1 . ./. ). ~I'O .400. 800 h-'6 V'. "
k, ~-"l ..." ,'. / / I (~~. . ~ II PJ.ANNIN6 U~I.-'
'I _..... ~,\".1 I . r 1 f f J' ~j ,I, I : ...;.L..Y /"--':"'. L ir",' LL,I 'go--! ~ I ~,,',
z till
0
~ ii I
:I: I
"
]J
0
"
m
~
r-
-
z
m
OJ
c
" I~:<E
" )> JI~
m
:0 3' .J I ~
" a- Ii
~ 9 III
Z J
"
..
~ ~
11
'l
0 !
r-
OJ
:0
- ..,.~
G>
:I:
-4
"'tJ I '" j
r-
~
i ~l
m ,....
"tJ ! I ~
c:
C
! i I'
-.
!
~
iii
-'
"'D
iii"
:I
'., .
-
E X H I BIT
"D"
I
>
1]
1]
:xJ
~
m
0
~
>
CIJ
nf
:JJ
."
~
Z
, .
:!
. ;
~ ~
~ !
. , '--
;~
.;~
. ,
;
"~
! ;--1.J
; .1,
',J
;~
!. t
I s:
f ."
r .
I ~
,
'"
. ~ I. ..
" ,'I'
. I i
" :.,
L ~':i
~; '!::
~< m~ ~W mi
:. . : ~ i_: J. i . ,... - '.
;! . . :;1 ~ :~!i
~ . , r ~!
~~ ~ r
h ,"
./
!,
~ I
,,; " iil
, H :I: ~j
: i i
l' 1:3' ~:
I ,=1. .
if Ii;;' i
I' 1m I
i; H,
~ 'f I
If .~"
,J !=l' ;
! ill! f
Ii;!i i
f ifi ~
i (sf I
ils:prr :
tfl,.rn r
JJ', fa
~1f.~ fF:
~~\. , ~ . , , , ,t
.....~,."''-...... ...
: ~~:= 4.;; ~
""I ~ ",,,,lt~~ ....,
I:
.
v
;;;
:t
;r
~
.,.....:. ":1
f:';!.!;::,:
"I: ".
Iw-
I: z r-
L! ~ E
"
. '. UI
i ~: 0 c
. '0 : 0
! !: . I ~i 0
i >
i -.' -I
.. I >
I H
I' . E.
s'
r 0 . E'
.i 0 ~ :
.~ ~ 0 . ~.
. 0
.
.
f . ::
. : j=
. : . ~
i :: :;
I
~
.. _..:..1 .
~, .."'11:1
.. ~H !
1,1.
fI ~r J i il j Ul
!.: '0. ::j
.:~ m
.; o. J +
0; S. ... 0
'i iH >
! 0 -I
I I .' 0 >
~ ! ! ii ! !
. i
i: : . : e il I
~ ~ o . ~::K
. .
~ , ~ ;
, i
:~~~
:hr!
f,' .1
,~; c:.ti!
" i:!j
I ;!~I
..01
I ~i:
! 11 i ~l
'~clli I
: '~d I
' (;l i
. it; ~ ~ :
!i ; [ !i g ~ I
~~'--,",'~~",,--y~~ --~t1
/? . ~~ '
. : ~ t I
~{ \)
"
,j;
1""11' I
,mll""ll ;;
-I,. I
lin:; ~""O\i
"Ill" ~ \0 :;\': 0:,'"
I \ .#
. j' ~ :
! i .:'X;':'
~ .. ~f)
~
i~
; ~
: i
-~
'"
;
;;
en
~ i
! ~
co <..:>'.
~
!ii
~
..
~i
!i
I
! :;
I: I!:i:i
iEE;j " '
i'.",
~: 11;:i! J3 ~- ,i;:
<'~~~~ "',
:r~, :~i:
t i ;J ii', , : ;1
.. .. c ". . ,_ __~ .
'f "':.:, :i ~ ~ '::-:--';
~ ~~_.,~/ tli,
~ - - ---. ~ ~ ~
~~ , : I
-I. iifa ,'Q ,
Ii "!~ 0 I
ti ;Q
I \;~ ,~-~~ '" 0 "" ~;,dJ, ',j
\ :... -- MORTONS W~y _
-::---- -.. ~.. . .
<J
G
J)
,~'
~i
..
.,
0,,11
~l
d l-
t" ;!
~
H
, l~
; 1\:;
!ii
i!l
~
m
.
~ :/
: ~
!~
f'il
. ;
~ ! ~
\i
c '",
''?- '\i.
. ':1 \
~ ;~ \
· i\_~~ ~j
!
I
L>
: ~
; !
@
r
I!'
=
~
t.',
fil
S
S
>~
~~ ::r
+ ~, '"
. CO :z
to... b
b ts
."lIn....
.. - "tt
~o
-~'>
~ J ..,
,:::--..
~....
~~
::0-
"'C.
..
n
o
I I j' !
Hj;' a
II
if:::;
Ii;:!
hI
.....
....-
1]
~
'. ..
:1 :_
WOOLBRIGHT PLACE P.U.D. fr--.....'
80YHTOH .."eH, '~O.'''A ' _, !
q; "
...ASTER PlAN f--"'--::'~
TRADEWlNOS DESIGN AND CONSmUCnON CORPORATION '''G:.t-~/
I
I
. ;
v.
n
'"
'"
r
8
'"
o
~
.
~
;:
~
l!'
>
so
~
l>'::b
~'"'Cl ::r~
;f 1 ~....
; ! ::r ftt
~tib~
"1> r') .. ~
.. -. ~'>
f:.l.t" ' ~
.. ~ ~ ~
":t ~
~;s
~..
~ llQ
1r'
~
'(.
~.
~
'"
E X H I BIT
II E ..
EXHIBIT "E"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Woolbright Place PUD
File number: 96-002
Reference:The submittal consists of a letter signed bv Michael
Morton. dated March 22. 1996 and three sheets prepared by CCL
Consultants Inc. sheets 1 of 2 and 2 of 2 prepared bv Brett Nein.
dated March 20. 1996 and sheet 1 of 1 prepared bv Louis R.
Campanile. Jr. dated April 8. 1996
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments: NONE
UTILITIES
NONE
I
I
NONE
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
4. No building structure, screen
enclosure, pool, or portion thereof is
allowed within setbacks, either now or
in the future. Chap.l, Art.II,pg.I-30
5. Project shall have underground
facilities to residential units.
Chap.2.5, Sec.9E,pg.2.5-7
6. Show the locations of all temporary
structures or permanent structures
having a temporary use. Provide a
statement outlining the temporary use
and when they will be removed.
Chap.3,Art.IV,Sec.3R,pg.3_5
7. Provide a master stormwater management
plan. Chap.3,Art.IV,Sec.3T,pg.3_6
Page 2 of 11
Conditions of Approval
Woolbright Place PUD
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
8. Site plan review & approval required.
Chap.4,Sec.2,pg.4-1
9. Plat review and approval required.
Chap.5,Art.II,Sec.1,pg.5-1
10. Sidewalks are required on both sides
of all local and collector streets.
Chap.6,Art.III,Sec.11A,P9.6_3
11. Provide Certification by Developer's
Engineer that drainage plan complies
with all City codes & standards.
Chap.6,Art.IV,Sec.5A,pg.6_7 and
Chap.23,Art.IIF,pg.23-8
12. Locate all drainage easements.
Chap.6,Art.IV,Sec.6B,pg.6-9
13. Minimum street right-of-way width for
a local street with 2 mountable curbs
is 50 feet not 40 feet as shown; with
swales minimum right-of-way width is
60 feet. Chap.6,Art.IV,Sec.10C,pg.6-11
14. Minimum cul-de-sac ROW diameter is
100' . Chap.6,Art.IV,Sec.10D,pg.6-12
15. Need SFWMD .& LWDD acceptance prior to
Engineering approval.
Chap.6,Art.VII,Sec.4B,pg.6-24
16. Applicant's attention is directed to
Chap.7,pg.7-1 regarding surety
requirements.
17. All landscaped areas shall be provided
with an automatic water supply system.
Chap.7.5,Art.II,Sec.5B,pg.7.5_14
18. Provide stop signs and stop bars in
accordance with the "Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices" . Chap. 23,
Art.IIB2,pg.23-7
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
19. Maximum square footage for entrance
wall sign shall be 32 sq. ft.
20. Since the square footage of the lot
proposed is closer to an R-2 zoning,
the Building Division suggests that
maximum lot coverage meet the 40%
maximum.
21. As to the question whether or not this
is a substantial modification, we will
support whatever the other divisions
agree upon.
Page 3 of 11
Conditions of Approval
Woolbright Place PUD
DEPARTMENTS
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
22. The developer has already received
one-half credit for private
recreation. Multi-family unit PODs 2A
and 2B already show privatized
recreation sufficient to qualify for
one-half credit, but restrict the
recreation provided to the multi-
family unit residents only. In order
to qualify for one-half credit for POD
I, the developer is obligated to
provide a minimum of five basic park
requirements suitable for the future
residents of this section.
23. The following recreation elements are
shown on the plan:
1. Pool
2. Sand volleyball court
3. Family picnic area
4. Playground area
5. Health trail
The recreation elements listed above
are insufficient to meet the needs of
the single-family units. The
Recreation Department cannot recommend
one-half credit for private recreation
provided at this time. The Recreation
Department recommends a minimum 1,300
square feet meeting hall be added to
the recreation elements in lieu of
either the health trail, volleyball
court or picnic area in order to
strengthen the recreation package
sufficiently for the department to
recommend one-half credit. The health
trail will need to include marked
distances so the user will know how
far they have travelled. The trail
should be asphalt or other hard
surface.
24. Based on the number of single-family
units, the following additional
recreation fees would be applicable if
the developer does not qualify for
one-half credit:
85 single-family units X .0180 =
1.530 acres.
Since the developer has already paid
one-half of the recreation fee, he
would be responsible for 1.530 divided
by 2 = .765 acres. Fee in lieu of
land is recommended.
INCLUDE
REJECT
Page 4 of 11
Conditions of Approval
Woolbright Place PUD
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I
25. If the final recreation package
includes a children's play area and
family picnic area, then additional
details would have to be provided to
insure that recreation equipment would
be of commercial quality and of
sufficient size to meet the need of
the community.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments:
26. It is recommended that the reduction
of the north PUD landscape buffer
width from 25 feet wide to 10 feet
wide not be approved.
27. It is recommended that the reduction
of the landscape buffer between POD 1
and POD 2B from 20 feet to 10 feet
wide not be approved.
28. It is recommended that the reduction
of the north PUD buffer from 40 feet
wide and 60 feet wide (both) to 15
feet wide (bo t h) not be approved.
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
29. Place a note on the master plan sheet
1 of 2 and 2 of 2 indicating that the
project is subject to conditions
documented in City of Boynton Beach
Resolution No. R95-65.
Page 5 of 11
Conditions of Approval
Woolbright Place PUD
DEPARTMENTS
30. Show on the master plan (sheet 1 of
2) the five (5) foot tall landscape
berm with ficus hedge (located at the
highest point of the berm) that is
described in Resolution Number R95-65
as required along the west property
line of the PUD with the exception of
the church parcel. Also, list on the
plan the landscape and berm
specifications that are described in
the resolution. Indicate on the plan
that the berm shall be completed by
February 7, 1996. Specify on the plan
that the landscape material will be
irrigated and comply with landscape
material specifications listed in the
landscape code.
Considering that the landscape berm
was not completed within three months
of the date the agreement was executed
(November 7, 1995) as required by
Resolution No. R95-65, it is
recommended that permit plans for the
landscaping and berm be submitted to
the Building Division of the
Development Department prior to
scheduling" this request for review by
the Planning and Development Board on
April 23, 1996. The permit plan
submitted to the Building Division
shall depict the berm and material
consistent with Resolution No. R95-65
and the other required landscape
specifications identified in Chapter
7.5, Article II - Landscape Code of
the City's Land Development
Regulations.
It is further recommended that the
water management tract (8.64 acres
gross) landscaping be completed and
accepted by the city prior to
submittal of a site plan for any
further construction in POD 1.
Acceptance of the landscaping will
require permit plans to be reviewed by
the city. The permit plans shall be
consistent with the landscape drawings
submitted for approval of plat 1 of
the PUD or equivalent. The
installation and final inspection
approval of the material will be
considered acceptance of the
landscaping.
INCLUDE
REJECT
Page 6 of 11
Conditions of Approval
Woolbright Place PUD
I DEPARTMENTS
31. On sheet 1 of 2 amend the south border
of the Woolbright Place PUD on the
west side of S.W. 8th Street to
correctly identify the property line
that separates the Woolbright Place
PUD from the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD
as established by Ordinance 89-18.
Ordinance 89-18 is the ordinance that
established the PUD. Rectify the
Woolbright Place PUD plat documents to
correspond with Ordinance 89-18 and
rezone to PCD the new configuration of
Morton's Way, unless otherwise
determined unnecessary by the city
attorney.
32. Place a note on the master plan (sheet
1 of 2) indicating that the Industrial
Access Road (Morton's Way) shall be
constructed by November 7, 1997. Also
add the typical cross section drawing
of the road, as it is depicted in
resolution number R95-65, onto the
master plan. Add to the drawing the
approved configuration of the pavement
for the Industrial Access Road
including the landscaping and sidewalk
referenced-in the resolution. If the
location of the three (3) curb cuts
proposed for the south side of the
road are not known at this time, place
a note on the plan referencing that
three curb cuts are proposed and will
be installed to city standards. Omit
the text "Proposed S.W. 8th Street"
and replace with Existing S.W. 8th
Street.
33. With a distinguishable symbol show and
identify on sheet 1 of 2 and 2 of 2
the following required perimeter
setbacks: 25 feet along the north and
west property lines; 20 feet along the
south and east property lines to
include the south and east sides of
lots 30 and 31. Also place a note
below the setback charts found on
sheet 2 of 2 indicating that the
perimeter setbacks supersede all other
setbacks.
I INCLUDE I REJECT I
Page 7 of 11
Conditions of Approval
Woolbright Place PUD
DEPARTMENTS
34. Submit for review landscape plans for
the 10 foot wide landscape buffer
shown along the north property of the
proposed project. To create a uniform
buffer along the north property line
of the PUD, show and identify
landscape species, sizes, spacing and
quantity of material specifications
consistent with the original approved
buffer. The plan shall include a
section/profile view of the buffer
material depicting the location of the
landscape material as it relates to
the two (2) foot tall berm that is
requested to run parallel to the
north property line of the subject
property. The landscape material
shall be located in a landscape
easement and the easement dedication
shall place the maintenance of the
landscape material and irrigation as
the responsibility of the H.O.A.. It
is recommended also that this buffer
be installed entirely at once prior to
Certificate of Occupancy of any
recreation structure or of a unit,
whichever comes first.
35. On sheet 1 of 2 show the acreage that
will be deducted from the PUD via the
reduction in the width of Morton's Way
and the reduction in the church parcel
because of the incorrect location of
the south lot line of the PUD.
Recalculate the site data and L.U.I.
data accordingly.
36. On sheet 1 of 2 revise site data note
B to reflect the location of the
residential units by identifying which
pod they are located within.
37. On sheet 1 of 2 and 2 of 2 add the
term easement to the areas identified
as landscape buffer.
38. On sheet 1 of 2 list the total L.U.I
floor area for the single-family
project and identify the total
permitted floor area for all projects
within the PUD.
39. On sheet 1 of 2 reference within the
area of Pod 1 that the master plan for
the pod is found on sheet 2 of 2.
40. On sheet 1 of 2 identify the location
of the land identified in the right-
of-way licensing agreement referenced
in Resolution R95-65. Also identify
on the plan the Palm Beach County
recording data.
INCLUDE
REJECT
Page 8 of 11
Conditions of Approval
Woolbright Place PUD
DEPARTMENTS
41. It is recommended that to the master
plan drawing sheet 2 of 2 be added
typical lot/unit detail drawings that
include dimensioned setbacks for the
building, screen enclosures, pools and
easements. The detail drawing shall
include a typical lot, corner lot,
perimeter lot and any other special
lots that would require clarity in
determining the allowed setbacks.
Include within the typical drawing the
location of proposed or easements of
record. Below the drawings identify
the specific lot number that the
detail drawing represents. Ensure
that the detail drawings represent all
lots proposed for the development.
42. Specify on the plan sheet 2 of 2 the
location of the five (5) model units
that are referenced on the plan or
omit them from the plan. If they are
going to be shown on the plan identify
that the use of the model units is
temporary.
43. On sheet 2 of 2 add to the project
summary notes a note that identifies
each of the proposed recreational
amenities by name.
44. It is recommended that the maximum
height of the single-family structures
be established at 25 feet. This
height is consistent with the height
limitation of the homes that are
located to the north in the R-1A
(Single-Family Residential) zoning
district. Amend the site data on
sheet 2 of 2 accordingly.
45. Place a note on the master plan (sheet
2 of 2) indicating that utility
service to the units will be
underground.
46. Place a note on the master plan (sheet
2 of 2) indicating that the setbacks
for accessory structures and other
building related construction shall
comply with the regulations identified
in the City of Boynton Beach Code of
Ordinances.
47. Omit the text" (interior)" and
"building separation" from the m1nimum
building setback chart found on sheet
2 of 2.
48. Omit the text "(interior)" from the
minimum screen enclosure setback chart
found on sheet 2 of 2.
INCLUDE
REJECT
Page 9 of 11
Conditions of Approval
Woolbright Place PUD
DEPARTMENTS
49. Omit the text "(interior)" from the
minimum pool and spa setback chart
found on sheet 2 of 2. Also identify
15 feet as the front setback for
pools.
50. Within the setback charts identify the
lot numbers that represent corner
lots.
51. Omit general note #9 found on sheet 2
of 2 and add the same note to project
summary note #7.
52. On sheet 2 of 2 identify the front of
all corner lots.
53. Place a note on sheet 2 of 2
indicating the buffer specifications
for the south and east buffer as
described on sheet 1 of 1.
54. Amend the project summary note #7
found on sheet 2 of 2 as follows:
Minimum lot size: 42' X 100' (4,200
square feet)
Minimum lot frontage 42'*
* frontage measured at 15 foot
front setback line for the
following irregular shaped lots;
2-6, 18-20 and 40-46.
55. Amend the project summary note #5
found on sheet 2 of 2 by removing the
text "Approximately 4.42 acres." and
replace with "minimum floor area per
unit is 1,784 square feet and 2,880
square feet is the maximum floor area
per unit".
56. Modify project summary note #1 found
on sheet 2 of 2 to correctly identify
the total gross area of the project.
57. To properly determine the number of
parking spaces that are required to
support the recreation facility, the
total floor area of the cabana and the
total water area of the pool is
needed. The total surface area of
another amenity constructed on an
improved surface is needed to
determine the number of parking spaces
that are required to support the
amenity. Show on sheet 2 of 2 the
total number of parking spaces
consistent with the regulations listed
in Section 11.H.16.e. of Chapter 2 -
Zoning of the City'S Land Development
Regulations. Also show the
computations used to determine the
number of required spaces on the
sheet.
INCLUDE
REJECT
Page 10 of 11
Conditions of Approval
Woolbright Place PUD
DEPARTMENTS
58. It is recommended that a ten (10) foot
wide landscape buffer easement be
added along the S.W. 8th Street
frontage of the project. The buffer
shall include a two (2) foot tall berm
(centered in the new landscape buffer
easement) and the material shall
either match the landscape scheme of
the adjacent property to the south or
a landscape plan shall be submitted to
include landscape material equal to
the total count of trees and
hedges/shrubs as shown for the
frontage of the adjacent project. The
landscape material shall be located in
a landscape easement and the easement
dedication shall place the maintenance
of the landscape material and
irrigation as the responsibility of
the H.O.A..
59. It is recommended that the description
of the material for the ten (10) foot
wide landscape buffer easement
approved for the south and east
property lines of the subject project
include a maximum spacing
specification of two (2) foot on
center for the hedges and the hedge
material be a native specie and
installed from a 3 gallon container.
It is further recommended that a ten
(10) to twelve (12) foot tall native
specie tree be placed on each lot that
includes the landscape buffer
easement. Two trees would be required
for lots 30 and 31 considering the
rear and side of the lots abut the
easement. The landscape material
shall be located in a landscape
easement and the easement dedication
shall place the maintenance of the
landscape material and irrigation as
the responsibility of the H.O.A. .
60. Place a note on sheet 2 of 2
indicating that improvements located
within the common area, excluding
bonded required improvements shall be
processed as a new site plan. Also,
indicate that landscaping is to be
installed and maintained by the H.O.A.
and located on single-family platted
lots and shall be processed as a new
site plan.
61. To show no increase in trips generated
by the proposed development, reduce
the number of single-family detached
units from 85 to 74 and omit the 16
duplex units from Pod 3. Amend the
master plan sheet 1 of 2 accordingly.
INCLUDE
REJECT
Page 11 of 11
Conditions of Approval
Woolbright Place PUD
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
62. Submission of a rectified master plan
showing compliance with the conditions
of approval for the project will be
required to be submitted to the
Planning and Zoning Department, in
triplicate, prior to platting and/or
site plan review for the PUD.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
1. To be determined.
TJH/dim
a:COmDept.Woo/p&d
.