Loading...
AGENDA DOCUMENTS AGENDA DOCUMENTS <2:- MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION BOVNTON BEACH, FLORIDA September 4, 1996 to fix his property. Mayor Taylor advised that he did not have an answer to that question, but pointed out that Mr. Oldaker must maintain his property. James Miriana said he was present to voice his displeasure at expenditure items on the agenda. There are many needy items in the City, but we do not have funds available. With the City fighting for revitalization of the downtown, Mr. Miriana does not feel it is right to put a City Hall in the Mall. He believes this will take people away from downtown. When this item was proposed, there was no mention of the amount of money this would cost. Mr. Miriana has estimated the first year's costs to run this office will be $100,000. Mr. Miriana does not feel there is a need for a second City Hall. The City always has money for other things, but when the people want things that are necessary, no funds are available. Mr. Miriana feels the needy must be considered first. Mayor Taylor advised that it is the City's job to provide services to its citizens. Using Mr. Miriana's logic, we would only have one park in downtown and have buses that only come to the downtown. City Hall in the Mall is for the convenience of the citizens. He does not see this service as a waste of money. The City feels it can provide better service to the community with a City Hall in the Mall. Woolbright Place PUD Michael Morton Howard Scharlin East side of SW 8th Street and approximately 2,250 feet north of Woolbright Road MASTER PLAN MODI FICA nON - Request to modify the previously-approved master plan for the Woolbright Place PUD. Requested modifications are limited to that portion of the PUD that is entitled Pod 1. Pod 1 is a 14.05 acre parcel. Attorney Cherof administered the oath to all who would be testifying in this proceeding. He advised the Commissioners to disclose any conversations they may have had with anyone related to this case. VIII. DEVELOPMENT PLANS: 1. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Description: Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz disclosed that she had conversations with members of the Boynton Lakes Estates community relative to this project. Commissioner Tillman disclosed conversations with Lisa Kramer. Commissioner Bradley disclosed conversations with Lisa Waters and Gary Lehnertz. 12 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA September 4, 1996 Commissioner Titcomb disclosed conversations with Boynton Lakes Estates' residents. Due to the number of conditions associated with this application, Attorney Cherof requested that the applicant indicate the conditions that were not acceptable so that the balance of the conditions could be accepted at the end of the proceeding. Michael Morton. 902 Clintmore Road. Boca Raton. Florida. is the agent for the applicant. This plan will change the 14 acres which are part of the PUD from the originally- planned multi-family project to a single-family designation. The applicant wishes to affirm that the change to the master plan is a non-substantial change. This will enable the applicant to go to the Planning and Development Board next Tuesday for review of the site plan. He requested a consensus from the Commission relative to the items on the site plan. Mr. Morton advised that the applicant is in agreement with all items with the exception of 12,25,27,34,40,41,42,44,54,55,57,58,59,andGO. Mr. Morton explained that the applicant changed this plan in order to address the needs of the residents of Lake Boynton Estates. This plan now reflects the 25' buffer along the north property line, and has taken into consideration the Gary Lehnertz landscape plan by using all of the plant material specified. The applicant has enhanced that plan by including additional material. The recreation area was moved to the center part of the project. Moving this area addresses a concern expressed by Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz. Comment #12 Previously, the largest concern appeared to the 40' street right-of-way. At the Commission's suggestion, the applicant added sidewalks on both sides of the 40' street right-of-way. The applicant hopes the Commission will find this compromise in compliance. Consensus There was a consensus of the Commission to allow the 40' wide street width. Comment #25 In order to make projects viable, applicants try to keep as many lots as possible. In two locations, there are dead-end streets. There were originally three of these locations, but the plan was reworked and that number was reduced to two. By taking the advice of staff, the applicant included a cul-de-sac in the most favorable area, and kept the dead-end streets in the location where too many lots would be lost. This item affects a number of other conditions having to do with road frontage. Mr. Morton advised that the two dead- 13 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA September 4, 1996 end streets were not objectionable to the Fire, Police or Public Works Departments. Mike Haag, Planning Administrator for the Planning and Zoning Department, stated that staff believes the two dead-ends are not conducive to a street layout in a PUD or a regular conventional development. Staff feels the dead-ends should be omitted by making some radiuses, including pie-shaped lots, or omitting some lots from the area. Dead-end streets are prohibited by our Code (Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 10T). The only way to get relief from a Code section is to request a waiver of the plat requirement. City Manager Parker asked staff if we are requesting cul~de-sacs at both dead-ends, or some sort of turn-around ability. Mr. Haag said staff wants the developer to omit the dead- ends by making a radius and having pie-shaped lots. Another recommendation would be to omit the lots to avoid dead-ends. In response to City Manager Parker's question, Mr. Haag advised that the applicant would lose approximately two lots by complying with staff's recommendations. Mr. Morton said he was not sure that number was correct; however, he pointed out that if the Fire, Police and Public Works Departments are not opposed, and there is no public safety issue, it would be a compromise to allow the applicant to get the maximum number of lots to accommodate the changes they have already made. William Hukill, Director of Development and City Engineer, said this is a violation of the Land Development Regulations that we have not allowed in other developments. He pointed out on the map how this situation was corrected in one area by creating a radius and pie-shaped lots without any significant loss of lots. This is poor planning and the Land Development Regulations do not permit this condition. Mayor Taylor asked if the pie-shaped lots would put the point of the lot at the intersection. Mr. Haag responded affirmatively and explained that the radius would form the pie-shaped lots that have a narrower frontage than the required 40'. The Zoning Code has regulations that would cover that situation. The frontage of the lot is measured at the building setback line rather than at the street frontage. Mayor Taylor asked the applicant to move on to the next issue at this point. The Commission will return to this issue later in the meeting. Comment #27 Mr. Morton advised that this comment deals with the irrigated landscaping plans in the S.W. 8th Street right-of-way which covers the medians and the swales. The only place where landscaping has been installed at this point is in the one median that runs from Woolbright Road up S.W. 8th Street in front of Cracker Barrel. There are two medians 14 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA September 4, 1996 north of that location that have not been landscaped. The underground irrigation sleeves are in for these two islands. Mr. Morton objects to this item at this time because of the timing involved. He would like to get approval from the Commission and the Planning and Development Board, and then move onto plat approval, full engineering plans and building permits. The applicant does not know at this point what the final configuration of those two islands will be. If a major retailer is brought in on the 14-acre parcel, most likely, the median will be altered significantly. It does not make sense to put a plat requirement on installation of landscape material that might be removed. He requested that the timing of this item be changed so that at some point in the future (perhaps after a certain number of homes receive COs) the applicant would be required to install the landscaping material. This will provide the opportunity to be able to work with the commercial developer and get the final design relative to the medians. Mr. Hukill reminded the Commissioners that this was done in the past with this developer on a number of occasions. The most recent case involves RaceTrac where there was an area that was not completed between RaceTrac and Leisureville. There is a similar situation in a project close to this one where the installation of landscaping keeps being delayed. This is the obligation of this developer, and he has acknowledged that. Mr. Hukill explained that the City does not know that anyone will ever develop that property. This development has been before the City for close to a decade, and we are still waiting with this as an eyesore. The material needs to be put in now. Staff recommends strongly that this work be done. City Manager Parker added that the City has held other developers to this requirement. When Quantum came before the Commission, they were required to put in the landscaping first. Quantum made the same comments at the time that they would have to change the median cuts in the future. The City Commission told them they would then have to change the landscaping at that time. If the property sits vacant for any length. of time, at least the medians are landscaped. Mr. Morton advised that RaceTrac bought the parcel approximately three years ago. They came through the City with their site plan, building plans and landscape plans. The obligation to do all of the landscaping including the berm along the canal is RaceTrac's obligation. RaceTrac has not performed and Mr. Morton discussed this situation before the City Commission. He guaranteed that RaceTrac would comply. They have still not fulfilled their obligation. Cracker Barrel is complying and agreed to landscape the berm along the canal. With regard to the medians, they do not come up to these 14 acres. The medians exist at the Trammel-Crowe property. Mr. Morton is not trying to push this item off. He is under 15 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA September 4, 1996 an agreed situation to install the landscape material around the lake. By agreement and Resolution and license with Leisureville, he was asked to delay that installation. He has now installed the berm which has been hydroseeded. The hedges are installed and the trees along SW 8th Street were put into the lake area as per the agreement. Mr. Morton agrees to install the landscape material in the medians, but those medians are part of Trammel-Crowe's approval and part of the commercial property. Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz confirmed that Mr. Morton complied with installing the hedges; however, she is concerned about the maintenance on those items. Mr. Morton agreed with her observations. He stated there is a maintenance association between this applicant, Trammel-Crowe and the church. The maintenance association is run by Trammel-Crowe because they are on-site. The contractor they hired to maintain the property has been terminated for lack of service. Mr. Morton put in a bubbler system because of his concern about the trees not surviving. The trees that have not survived will be replaced. Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz feels the attractiveness of the medians will be an incentive for people to purchase homes in this area. Mr. Morton is not opposed to landscaping the medians. He is only opposed to making it a condition of plat approval. He was hoping to have plat approval within 45 days. He cannot get the landscaping installed within 45 days, and he does not want it to hold up the plat. He would prefer to tie the timing to the CO of the first unit. Even if the median is changed, Mr. Morton will be happy to have installed it and have to remove it and reinstall it. Mr. Haag advised that he and Mr. Hukill have objections to tying this to first CO. Planning and Zoning Department Comment #73 asks for the landscaping to be done 90 days after approval by the Planning and Development Board so that if the development does not go forward, the medians will still be completed. City Manager Parker said this property has been unsightly. To delay the landscaping even further is not appropriate for the surrounding communities. The road now goes through from Woolbright Road to Boynton Beach Boulevard. This is a heavily-used roadway and the City is receiving calls from people who want the medians to be landscaped and maintained. Mr. Hukill advised that the City has two examples of plats where landscaping did not go in. One of them was Boynton Lakes Plat 5, and the other is Cedar Ridge. Cedar Ridge was a hazard for the City and there were a lot of policing problems at that site. Both projects proceeded to plat and beyond, and were well through the required improvements. In both cases, there were dust problems and blowing sand. Mr. Hukill does not support waiting until first CO. He feels this landscaping should be required with plat approval. Mr. Morton said the applicant still has several parcels that will be coming into the City for approvals. Burger King is on the TRC agenda for next Tuesday. Discount Auto is also 16 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA September 4, 1996 coming in. He feels there are still opportunities for the City to require the applicant to comply in the future. He does not want to delay Kennedy Homes, and that is the reason for his request at this time. For the record, Mr. Morton said, "we will do our best to get this thing started, and if I don't keep my word, you'll get me the next time I stand up here". Mayor Taylor feels the median improvements provide a better opportunity of attracting people into the complex. One of the first things the City does when bringing in prospective tenants for Quantum Park is to point out how beautiful the park looks. Mayor Taylor feels the development will look much better with the landscaping. He feels a great deal can be done to the medians in 45 days. Mr. Morton inquired if he could begin installation while he is going through plat approval. Mayor Taylor feels the Commission has been clear about what it wants to see done with these medians. He feels the area will look better, and a lot of problems will be solved if the medians are landscaped. Comment #34 Mr. Morton advised that this comment deals with the dead-end lots. Comment #41 To make this plan work, the developer made seven lots 42' wide by 95' deep. The remainder of the lots are a minimum of 100' deep. The applicant is requesting permission to reduce certain lots by a half foot so that the lots will be 99.5' deep and 95.5' deep. Mayor Taylor reminded Mr. Morton that the City went through this on another project and Commissioner Bradley was opposed to a reduction to 4,000 square feet. When the decision was made by the Commission to allow that, they also determined 4,000 square feet would be the minimum, and we would try not to go that low again in the future. Mr. Morton agreed to make the switch to 99.5' and 95.5'. Comment #42 This comment also relates to the lots in the dead-end areas. Comment #44 This comment relates to landscaping and the lake plantings. As per the agreement, and the license agreement with Leisureville, the applicant has installed all of the material. There are maintenance concerns and trees that have not survived. Those trees will be 17 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA September 4, 1996 replaced. Trammel-Crowe assured Mr. Morton today that the maintenance contractor has been replaced on the site. Mr. Morton believes the agreement supersedes Comment #44. Mr. Haag said he does not know if that statement is true. The Commission would have to confirm that. Mr. Haag did not know if the Commission was aware of the approved plan for that area. Mr. Morton is saying that when the Commission approved the Resolution with the berm and hedge along the east side of Leisureville, it replaced the plan that was approved in 1990. Mr. Morton said those approvals did replace the 1990 plan because the planting on the berm in Leisureville was different from what was asked to be put in the berm. That entire plan was changed, and has been installed as per an agreement that required the berm to be installed with a hedge. That changed the 1990 landscape plan dramatically. The applicant is in compliance with everything they agreed to on the new plan. City Manager Parker stated that the only issue involved is one of paperwork and tracking. This project has numerous things associated with it. The City is requesting that the paperwork that has been submitted with the master plan reflects the previous approvals so that the documents are all consistent at this time. The City does not have an argument with approval or non-approval. We want the master plan revised to reflect the approvals so that we only have to go to the latest document to get all of the necessary information. We want all records to be up-to-date as the applicant goes forward. Mayor Taylor recalls meeting with the residents of this area regarding the berm. The residents had different opinions on what they wanted to see in the berm. A compromise was reached which included a berm and hedge. Mr. Morton said he would be happy to work with staff in making any changes on the master plan to provide a trail. In response to Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz' question, Mr. Morton advised that the issue with RaceTrac is that they were sold the property to the canal right-of-way. The responsibility for RaceTrac doing the berm went along with the sale of the property. Mr. Morton agreed to comply with Comment #44. Mr. Haag asked for further clarification. Using the overlay, he pointed out the area involved with the berm and landscaping associated with the Resolution. It excluded the church. Mr. Morton is saying that the Resolution that involves the berm and the hedge replaces the 1990 plan that shows landscaping around the lake, the preserve area, and landscaping in the right-of-way. Mr. Morton disagreed. He said the applicant took the 1990 plan and put in the berm and the hedge. He put in the trees (including a combination of Oak trees and Palms) along SW 18 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA September 4, 1996 8th Street, and hydroseeded the lake banks. The only exception to the 1990 plan is the littoral zones along the lake bank. This was a requirement of South Florida Water Management which has since been eliminated in drainage areas. This plan was submitted to the City, and some changes are still required. Utilities had a comment about not putting Oak trees in the utility easement. Those trees were moved out of that area. City Manager Parker asked Mr. Morton if he was saying that whatever is allowed by the other agencies to be permitted around the lake planting zone and the preserve area he still intends to plant in accordance with the previous plan that the agreement specifically addressed with the buffer zone. Mr. Morton said this was not his understanding. His understanding was that when they changed the entirety of the lake area, the plan was different than what was originally shown for the area. Mr. Morton said the applicant put in the trees, but eliminated the littoral zoning plantings because they are no longer required by South Florida Water Management. City Manager Parker advised that they are still required by the City by virtue of approval of the plan. There was never any intent to change the landscape provisions of this plan. Mr. Morton feels that by sitting down with Leisureville representatives and discussing the changes to the plan, they changed the tenor of what was being installed in that lake. What was planted is allowable and acceptable. Attorney Cherof advised that this is not an issue the Commission needs to micromanage. Condition #44 will be included in the adoption. The documentation will have to fall into place, and this will be resolved at an administrative level. The Commission does not have to try to interpret documents that are not before the Commission. Comment #46 Mr. Morton advised that the same thing applies to Comment #46 which is a housekeeping item among the City Attorney, Planning, Engineering and the applicant which involves the north property line of Cracker Barrel and the south property line of the church parcel. City Manager Parker advised that the reason this appears now is because it has been discussed many times, and the situation still is not corrected. Staff felt that the situation might be corrected if it is a condition of plat approval. Mr. Morton said this is not the applicant's issue. He has a corrected property line which is the north property line of Cracker Barrel. The problem involves the fact that in 1990, when the plat came in and the development orders were written, there was a scrivener's error. Mr. Morton said he cannot do anything about this. This is a situation which must be worked out with the City Attorney and staff, and Mr. Morton will assist. Attorney Cherof again advised that Comment #46 will be included and this issue will be 19 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA September 4, 1996 resolved one way or another. Mr. Morton objected to this as a condition of approval. Comment #54 Mr. Morton advised that Comment #54 is not a problem. The applicant will extend the wall around that portion of the lots or install a fence with specific landscaping for buffering. Mr. Haag asked if this will be common ground or part of the lot. Mr. Morton said he will be submitting a site plan for the entrance feature. The most likely probability is that they will run a fence. He is not certain if it will be common ground or part of the lot. . Mr. Haag advised that staff will accept it either way, but the comment says common ground. Comment #55 Mr. Morton said the applicant will take this comment into consideration when he submits a site plan for the pool area. Comments #57 and #58 Both of these comments deal with the plant material and what makes up the buffer between Lake Boynton Estates and this property. On Comment #57, staff took Gary Lehnertz' plan and used the plant material shown on that plan (the same plant material shown on the applicant's plan at this time), and made comments that define the trees, hedges, and shrubs. In discussions with Mr. Haag this morning, there was agreement that there are two problems. The applicant agreed with Mr. Lehnertz' plan and tried to locate the material so that it is acceptable with the FPL guidelines for planting materials in or near their easement areas. FPL provides a brochure which lists recommendations on where to plant trees. There is a minor line that runs behind these houses. The applicant has tried to keep some of the canopy trees as far away from the power lines as possible. These are the trees recommended by Gary Lehnertz. Comment #58 then says that if the applicant follows FPL's guidelines, there will be a problem with some of the trees. In discussions with FPL, they do not have a great concern. They would prefer the use of smaller trees, but the applicant has complied with the Lehnertz plan. Another issue between Comments #57 and #58 involves timing. The City wants the entire 20 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA September 4, 1996 buffer installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of any recreation structure, sales model facility, or residential unit, whichever comes first. This is a timing issue because a sales model will be put up while land development work is being done. It does not make sense to install a berm at that time. It would be better to install this berm commensurate with the first CO for a residential unit on the property. Mr. Haag advised that the biggest issue staff has with both the approved plan and the proposed plan is the overhead power lines. Mr. Morton has enhanced the plan by adding material to it; however, there are still large canopy trees within 6' of the FPL easement. On the Gary Lehnertz plan, the north row of trees, which are about 50' on center along the entire buffer, are right on the easement. The location of the trees is staff's concern. Mr. Haag does not believe it is wise to plant large canopy trees underneath power lines. Mr. Morton pointed out that the Gary Lehnertz plan has the trees underneath the power lines. His plan moved the trees 6' to 1 A' south of the power lines. If staff wants to change the species on the plan, when the applicant comes in for site plan approval for the berm, those discussions can take place. Mr. Haag recommends changing the species to one that can be planted either with the Lehnertz plan or the proposed plan. Mr. Morton has agreed to plant a smaller tree. If that happens, the City would want to increase the number of trees. City Manager Parker feels the neighbors would want the canopy trees as opposed to smaller trees even though there may be more of them. Commissioner Bradley pointed out that 6' to 10' is not going to make much difference in five years when the trees are mature. FPL will have the same problem cutting those trees at that time. Mayor Taylor recommends staying with the original plan, moving them 6'. He does not have a problem with them not being in place when the sales office goes up, but he does have a problem waiting until the first CO. Mayor Taylor felt the installation of the trees would be a good marketing tool. Mr. Morton explained that the builder and developer must make the decisions relative to marketing. If they feel it is necessary to put in the landscaping berm sooner because of marketing, then at least it will be their decision. During land development, the workers will take home some of the trees, or ride the bulldozer up on the berm. This creates unnecessary problems. The sales activity on the site at that time is confined to the sales area because the remainder of the site is full of activity for sewer, water, paving, and drainage. A visual berm is not effective at that time. Mr. Morton added that the berm is already in. The landscaping needs to be added. Mr. Morton explained that the irrigation has been vandalized. Mr. Morton advised that this buffer is Kennedy Homes' responsibility. 21 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA September 4, 1996 Comment #63 Mr. Morton said the applicant included sidewalks on both sides of the street in the entire community with the exception of the three lots inside the cul-de-sac in the northwest corner. The applicant would prefer not to put the sidewalk in that area. Comment #72 With regard to the undisturbed area (which appears in Comment #72 and in other comments) the applicant does not object to Kevin Hallahan's recommendation to remove the exotic vegetation to his satisfaction, and if other material is needed in the area, the applicant will plant it. (This appears under Comment #31.) The applicant is not running the berm around the perimeter because it is a buffer of 80' at some points. They are proposing to end the berm at the lots that are to the west of the cul-de-sac (Lot 7), and leave the undisturbed area totally undisturbed. City Manager Parker read Comment #31, and pointed out that it does not say this is a recommendation. The comment explains that staff can only evaluate the site after the exotic vegetation is removed. Mr. Hallahan is reserving comment on this until he sees what the site looks like after the exotics have been removed. Mr. Morton said he agrees with that comment. Once the exotics are removed, if Mr. Hallahan wants additional material planted, the applicant will plant that material. Mr. Morton does not want to put in a berm in addition to what Comment #31 already requires. The applicant will comply with exactly what Mr. Hallahan recommends. Mr. Haag clarified that the approved master plan did not show a lot layout, but does show the berm continuing all of the way over to SW 8th Street. Staff's pOSition is that there is a requirement for a berm. Mayor Taylor confirmed with Mr. Morton that his intention is not to include a berm in the portion of the undisturbed area if Mr. Hallahan determines that the vegetation is adequate after the exotics are removed. . City Manager Parker asked Mr. Morton what his plan includes if Mr. Hallahan determines that a berm is needed around the entire perimeter as shown on the plan today. Mr. Morton does not believe that will happen. However, if additional trees are needed to keep the buffer strong, that will be done. Mr. Morton does not want to be required to put the buffer in. He would prefer to leave that decision to Kevin Hallahan at a later date. Commissioner Bradley confirmed with Mr. Morton that if Mr. Hallahan decides Mr. Marton needs to put in the buffer, he agrees to do it because he trusts Mr. Hallahan's judgment. 22 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA September 4, 1996 Comment #70 A 25' height limitation was established on two-story houses. Because of modern architecture, some two-story houses are taller than 25'. The applicant is requesting a 30' height limit to allow for the ceiling heights on the first and second to be 12' and then have a roof elevation that will be approximately 6' above that. Mayor Taylor did not object to this request. The Commissioners confirmed their agreement to change Comment #12 to read, "Minimum street right-of-way width for a local street with 2 mountable curbs is 40 feet; with swales minimum right-of-way width is 60 feet. Chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. 10C, pg. 6-11 ". Carol Fretwell. 713 SW 3 Avenue. said that with regard to Comment #73, other developers have been made to conform in advance, and this developer should also be made to do so. Ms. Fretwell feels that Mr. Morton's approach is that he is entitled to do everything within 45 days. He uses the term "better served", but she wonders who is being better served. This property has been in disrepair for over ten years. Mr. Morton makes promises for other owners' properties, but then comes back and says he cannot make these owners do what he promised they would do. She sees an image of "smoke and mirrors" and feels Mr. Morton is a magician. He brings projects forward for City Commission consideration, and then he stands at the podium and offers to consider things he is supposed to do. Ms. Fretwell would like to see this project go through so that it is developed and this issue is closed; however, there are reasons for each of these steps. Mayor Taylor assured Ms. Fretwell that the City Commission knows which department is placing conditions on the developer. When a developer brings in a project, he presents his viewpoint. Doing the landscaping later in the development process saves money. It is up to the City to decide whether or not to allow that. This is a right that the developers have. There are over 70 conditions placed on this developer. He has agreed to almost all of those conditions. The City Commission has to make sure that the interests of the City are being preserved. The developer is trying to make sure his interests are being preserved. Mr. Morton has lived up to his promises with regard to RaceTrac and Cracker Barrel. Mayor Taylor feels Mr. Morton has dealt with him in a fair manner up to this point. Mr. Morton reminded the Commissioners that he has agreed that RaceTrac will comply or he will comply. Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz confirmed with Mr. Morton that Comment #74 is acceptable. Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz asked Mr. Morton to comment with regard to Tambri Heyden's suggestion about pie-shaped lots. Mr. Morton stated that the developer would lose three 23 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA September 4, 1996 or four lots to go to radiuses. Rick Wohlfarth, CCL Consultants, said there are two very important points. If the radius is brought around, Lot 43 and Lot 21 are very close to the roadways. What the developer is really dealing with is a driveway that is servicing one lot. It is an extension of a driveway. From a planning perspective, Lots 44 and 22 will be the most desirable and will sell the quickest. If you provide an eyebrow, each lot below must be narrowed. That will result in the loss of two lots. To widen the pie to allow 20' setbacks, the developer will lose three to four lots. The developer tried to provide a plan that was satisfactory to the neighbors. This is an acceptable alternative. If the developer accepts the recommendation, he will lose three or four lots. Mayor Taylor feels that although the developer might lose a lot or two, the lot remaining would be much larger and could be sold at a higher price because it would be an ideal place to buy. Mayor Taylor does not want to set a precedent of doing dead-end lots. He would rather see the eyebrow. Commissioner Bradley agreed with the Mayor's remarks. Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz would not support setting a precedent because it will carryover to other developments. Mr. Morton agreed to go along with this suggestion as long as there is a compromise in that the minimum radius size for the front be reduced 20'. The house will be set back in the right spot, but the developer would be able to get more lots in by having a smaller radius. They would eliminate the dead-end to do that. A couple of lots will be eliminated, but the number will not be four. Mr. Haag said it should be 31.5' at the building line and 15' back. This would follow the regulations in the Code. Mr. Morton said he will try to redesign it and work with staff. Mayor Taylor agreed to leave this comment in and let staff work it out. Comment #2.7 Commissioner Bradley feels the Mayor's comments were correct in this regard. Marketing this entire area would be enhanced by completion of these medians because it will benefit the look overall. Comment #54 No objection 24 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA September 4, 1996 Comments #57 and 58 Mayor Taylor reminded everyone that there was a consensus of the Commission to go with the 6' and use the larger trees. Attorney Cherof advised that Comment #57 will be included, and Comment #58 will be rejected. Mr. Morton stated that the physical earth berm is already installed. Kennedy Homes will be coming in with the plat, site plan for the recreation area, and site plan for the plantings on the berm, the entrance, the card gate, and other different things. They will include their building plans for permits. Kennedy will not close on the property and move forward until they are assured the plat is approved. Under the contract, Kennedy has the responsibility of installing the planting material on this berm. They have agreed to do that, but will not do it until they close on the property. Mr. Morton would like a trigger attached to this so that Kennedy Homes will install the plant material prior to issuance of the first CO on the first house. Since this suggestion was not acceptable to the Commissioners, Mr. Morton suggested that the trigger be when the sewer and water are accepted. Mr. Hukill explained that if the City Commission accepts installation at first CO, it will be nine months or more before the planting is done. If we wait until water and sewer is approved, the planting will come in with final approval of the required improvements which do not begin until the plat is recorded. Therefore, the time line is still the same. If the business problem is that the buyer will not buy until the plat is recorded or approved, then the thing to do is place a time limit on it and not issue any permits, except the development permit, until the installation is complete. Bruck Minik. 718 SW 4 Avenue. agrees with Mr. Hukill's remarks. He does not feel the residents or the City should have to wait nine months for this landscape barrier. During construction, the residents will be exposed to the noise and dirt from that project. He further pointed out that no one is maintaining the buffer zone at this point. The grass and weeds have not been cut for a year. He asked for clarification regarding the setbacks of the homes on the northern boundary of this project, and asked what will be put in place on the northwest corner of the project at the cul-de-sac. Mr. Morton advised that the setbacks will be 40', and the area in question is part of the undisturbed area. Mr. Morton agreed with Mr. Hukill's suggestion to place a time limit on the installation of the landscape material. He recommends a 180 day time limit. Mr. Hukill disagreed with 180 days because that would still result in nine months before this planting is done. Mr. Hukill recommended that the Commission require the planting to begin immediately following plat approval. Commissioner Bradley recommended requiring the planting to completed 90 days after plat 25 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA September 4, 1996 approval. Marv Fornataro. 718 SW 4 Avenue. said she received the notification of this meeting yesterday, and the notice said the application would be addressed by the Commission on September 3, 1996 rather than today. She explained that this is the fourth of fifth meeting the residents have attended on this same subject. She felt the residents made their wishes clear. The buffer behind her home is a pile of sand. She has complained about this area because it has not been mowed in at least a year. She requested that maintenance begin in this area. Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz explained to Ms. Fornataro that she received many calls from the residents who have concurred with the basic plan. Mr. Morton assured Mayor Taylor that Trammel-Crowe is hiring a new maintenance contractor. Mayor Taylor advised Ms. Fornataro that the City Commission has addressed the concerns of the residents with conditions regarding the buffer and landscaping, recreation, and the sidewalks. Mayor Taylor is confident with what the Commission has done up to this point. The Commission has now decided that the landscaping is to be completed 90 days from plat approval. Attorney Cherof advised that the Planning and Development Board meeting at 7:00 p.m., on Tuesday, September 10, will address this application. The public can comment at that time. Consensus There was a consensus of the Commission to allow the 30' height for the two-story structures. Mr. Morton asked for clarification on the issue of the sidewalks in the cul-de-sac. Mayor Taylor advised that he would not support Mr. Morton's request to eliminate the sidewalks in that area. Mr. Morton agreed to put in the sidewalks adjacent to the houses. Mayor Taylor clarified that the only condition the Commission is changing is Comment #12. That change permits the street width to be 40' rather than 50'. He is comfortable with all other conditions including the comments made by the Commission this evening. Motion Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz moved to approve pending all of the recommends by staff are adhered to. 26 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA September 4, 1996 Attorney Cherof advised that the motion should include everything with the exception of Comment #12. He reviewed Exhibit "F". Everything on Page 1 is included with the exception of Comment #12, which is rejected. On the additional comments sheet, Comment #12 will read as follows: Minimum street right-of-way width for a local street with two mountable curbs is 40', with swales, minimum right-of-way width is 60'. On Page 2, Comments #17 through 33 are all included. Comment #27 has been changed to require the landscaping "90 days after plat approval at which time all building permits and certificates of occupancy issuance cease". City Manager Parker explained that the City Commission has agreed with the requirements of the comment relative to medians being in prior to recording of the plat. Attorney Cherof repeated that Comments #17 through 33 are included. Comments #34 through 47, 48 through 56, and 57 are included with the last paragraph of Comment #57 deleted. In its place, add: The entire berm and landscaping to be installed within 90 days of plat approval. Failure to complete construction shall operate the barring of the issuance and any permits and Certificates of Occupancy. Comment #58 is rejected. Comments #59 and 60 are included. Comments #61 through 69 are included. Comment #70 is modified to read: The maximum height is established at 30' rather than 25'. The remaining comments are included. Mr. Morton asked for clarification on the timing of the median. He questioned whether the Commission wants it irrigated and installed prior to the time of plat. Mayor Taylor responded affirmatively. Mr. Morton explained that he will be coming in with modifications to the medians, and all of that landscaping will have to be removed. Mr. Morton also added that with regard to Comment #59, there is a 12' utility easement. Half of the easement is in the berm and half is in the utility easement. The applicant has agreed with the recommendation of the Utilities Department not to put in Oak trees or Gumbo Limbo. The applicant will install Palm trees, and they would not be put over the force main. Therefore, the applicant has slightly modified the landscape plan behind Lots 8 and 9. The comment is actually saying that the applicant must move six additional feet in, and that would make the lots difficult to build on. 27 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA September 4, 1996 City Manager Parker advised that staff's recommendation is that the applicant move the easement 6' to the south so that larger plants can be installed and there will not be any encroachment to the south. Mr. Morton asked for authorization to allow those two lots to conform to the Lehnertz plan for 19', but in the last 6', allow them to put in Palm trees and other material approved by staff . In response to Mayor Taylor's question about whether or not the staff would have a problem with this suggestion, City Manager Parker stated that staff is willing to work with Mr. Morton. However, staff did not want Mr. Morton to use the utility restriction to eliminate landscaping items that were requested. Staff wants the flexibility to request the shifting of the easement so that we can keep the full landscaping as opposed to decreasing the landscaping. Attorney Cherof advised that Comment #1 and Comment #59 give staff and Mr. Morton the opportunity to work this out. Mr. Morton would like agreement that he does not have to move the easement 6' to the south. In those two particular lots, he will use the plant material recommended by Pete Mazzella rather than planting Oak and Gumbo Limbo. Mr. Haag pointed out that in Comment #1, the Utilities Department is concerned about where the tree is planted and the extension of the limbs. Utilities feels the tree is in the easement even when the tree canopy is in the easement. Commissioner Titcomb suggested that this item be worked out with staff without changing the conditions. Mayor Taylor questioned why staff has a problem with Mr. Morton changing the trees in this area. City Manager Parker explained that the Palm trees will not provide the same buffer that the canopies of Oak trees provide. In addition, Mr. Haag explained that this area begins at Lots 8 and 9 and extends into the cul-de-sac area. Attorney Cherof suggested adding language at the end of Comment #59 which states: Obtain staff approval to use substitute plantlngs along this portion of the buffer. City Manager Parker pointed out that by moving the easement, staff does not know how much of the back yard is a problem. The property owners need to use their back yards. Mr. Haag explained that these lots are deeper. They measure 125' deep. The setback to the building is 40' to the north property line. The edge of the easement is 3' from the 28 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA September 4, 1996 buildable area that Mr. Morton established. Commissioner Bradley realized that the only real loss would be on the property description. They would have buildable area up to the limit. City Manager Parker recommended that Mr. Morton be allowed to plant Palm trees instead of Oak trees in this particular area, but must plant two Palm trees in place of every one Oak tree. Mr. Morton was agreeable to this solution. Motion Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz moved to approve with changes as outlined in Attorney Cherof's reiteration of going through the conditions and verbiage stated. Commissioner Bradley seconded the motion which carried 5-0. MAYOR TAYLOR DECLARED A BRIEF RECESS. THE MEETING RECONVENED AT 9:45 P.M. IX. NEW BUSINESS: A. Items for discussion requested by Commissioner Matt Bradley 1 . Qualifications for student appointments to the Advisory Board on Children & Youth Commissioner Bradley stated that he solicited a young woman who is a member of his church for membership on the Advisory Board on Children and Youth. When she agreed to serve, Mayor Taylor appointed her as a Regular/Student member of the board. Our Code requires all members of this board to be residents of the City. Mayor Taylor was unaware of the fact that she was not a City resident. She attended a meeting and was a contributor. There are three student positions on the board. Two of the positions are voting members; the third is not. Commissioner Bradley suggested that the third student position include criteria to allow participation by a student from outside the City. The Commissioners were in agreement with this suggestion for the following reasons: 1. This person could provide input on things that are going on outside of the City limits; 2. Many times, student member positions remain vacant for the entire year; and 29 Nancy Worrell 712 s.W. 4th.Av~nue 13Y7 -()50v/ Ed and Lisa Waters 709 s.W. 4th Avenue 737-1381 Vinola Rada 719 s.W. 3rd Avenue 735-3842 Robin Hanna S.W. 3rd Avenue 735-3842 Gary Lehnertz 619 s.W. 2nd Avenue 737 -2753 Mary Ann Fornataro 718 s.W. 4th Avenue 738-5725 Carol Fretwell 713 S.W. 3rd Avenue 737 -6424 Robert Reardon 648 s.W. 4th Avenue 734-2906 Margaret Roberts Leisureville Roy Essery 118 s.W. 8th Court 732-4914 l.. -'1'ilt;- b' c~w; 1'Vi L;.s r- ~? l'~j/'l1t::/Vd::-S ~tU:: C.AJ U-6J hv '17/J-r/9( ~6A,a.(Ji'A/6 /}J!:. ;t4JIuL flu,,- /1-1 / L IU fo/) I /1"1,,()/JIIA(,..?f fAV' tA/tJiJ U3 /Z16U fJ~ fv j) Homeowner (Michael Czecholinski?) 706 s.W. 4th Avenue 738-6395 . ~ L'h.~:,~;..,,~..;->;~.~~-~;s,_~:";:;~l.,.:.-it.i,~-,;h~.!2: ~'," .:~-\ ,_::",,,,_,_,;!(;:,~,-,~,->,:(,;,;"" 1, .;..'< t PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-475 TO: Carrie Parker City Manager Tambri J. Heyden, AICP, ~ Planning and Zoning Director FROM: DA TE: September 12, 1996 SUBJECT: Copies of Development Plans of Current Projects Scheduled for Review by the City Commission at the September 17, 1996 City Commission Meeting Please find attached five (5) sets of plans for the following current development projects: Conditional Use St. Joseph's Episcopal Church COUS 96-004 Master Plan Modification Woolbright Place PUD (POD 1) (2nd Submittal) MPMD 96-005 Major Site Plan Modification - Boynton Beach Community Development Corporation office MSPM 96-006 New Site Plan Flower's Bakery Warehouse/Distribution Center - Quantum Park PID NWSP 96-006 Note: Please return the plans/documents to the Planning and Zoning Department following the meeting. If I can be of further assistance, please contact me. T JH:bme Attachments cc: Central File Subject File a:tranplan.912 MINUTES PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 10, 1996 Mr. Milord advised that the addition is another classroom and some washroom areas. He agreed with all staff's conditions of approval. Motion Vice Chairman Golden moved to approve the request for conditional use approval for construction of a 1,878 square foot addition to Building NO.5 to include a new classroom, a covered walkway and a washroom facility in the 51. Joseph's Episcopal Church and School complex, subject to staff comments. Mr. Elsner seconded the motion. No one in the audience wished to address this item. The motion carried 6-0. Rezoning 2. Project: Agent: Owner: Location: Description: Motion East Ridge PUD John A. Grant, Jr., Inc. Gary De Graf, De Graf, Inc. Northeast of intersection of N.E. 4th Street and N.E. 20th Avenue Request for master plan approval for 34 single-family units in connection with a rezoning of 5.01 acres from R- 3 to PUD (Planned Unit Development) with an LUI of 7.00. Vice Chairman Golden moved to continue the public hearing for the rezoning for the East Ridge PUD to the October 8, 1996 Planning and Development Board meeting. Mr. Aguila seconded the motion, which carried 6-0. B. Subdivision Master Plan Modification 1. Project: Location: Woolbright Place PUD (Pod 1) (2nd Submittal) Approximately 2,000 feet north of the intersection of 6 MINUTES PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 10, 1996 Applicant: Owner: Description: Woolbright Road and S.W. 8th Street Richard C. Wohlfarth, P.E. - CCL Consultants Howard Scharlin, Trustee Request to amend the previously approved master plan for 14.05 acres to change the dwelling units within Pod 1 from 90 multi-family dwelling units to 84 single-family, detached dwelling units; to reduce the north setback from 60 feet to 40 feet and reduce the perimeter building setback along S.W. 8th Street from 40 feet to 25 feet; to establish a 15 foot south perimeter building setback and a 20 foot east perimeter building setback, and add private recreation facilities. Chairman Dube advised that this has already been approved by the City Commission, and it is before this board to determine whether it is a substantial or non substantial change. Ms. Heyden advised the board of the procedure. This first went to the City Commission for a determination of a substantial or nonsubstantial change. They determined it to be a nonsubstantial change and forwarded it to the Planning and Development Board for final determination and review of the comments. Mr. Wische said he attended the City Commission meeting at which this item was discussed for two hours. He was prepared to make a motion. Motion Mr. Wische moved that this is not a substantial change and approve it subject to staff comments. Vice Chairman Golden seconded the motion. Michael Morton stated that the plan before the board this evening has already been conformed to meet all of the changes that the City Commission requested. The motion carried 6-0. Chairman Dulle asked if anyone in the audience wished to comment on this item; however, no one did. 7 7.B.l MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION WOOLBRIGHT PLACE PUD (POD 1) PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-453 FROM: Chairman and Members Planning and Development Board J'v.. 0. 11 tf.., Tambri J. Heyden, AICP Planning and Zoning Director TO: DATE: September 5, 1996 SUBJECT: Woolbright Place PUD - Master Plan Modification File No. MPMD 96-005 At the September 4, 1996, City Commission meeting, the City Commission made a finding of no substantial change regarding the modifications requested for the above-referenced master plan modification. Their finding included conditions of approval that are, in part, identified in the attached staff report, and formally established in the attached Development Order, dated September 4, 1996. For your information, the conditions described in the original staff report to the City Commission (Planning and Zoning Memorandum No. 96-433) remain valid, with the exception of conditions #12, #57, #58, #59, and #70 which were modified by the City Commissioners and itemized on the last page of the Development Order. Staff recommends that this request for modifications to the above-referenced master plan be approved, as endorsed and conditioned by the City Commission. T JH:meh:dim xc: Central File a:MPMD6005. ., PL. ..NNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-433 Agenda Memorandum for September 4, 1996 City Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker City Manager /f. ./. (_. 7f-- A- Tambri J. Heyden, AICP Planning and Zoning Director FROM: DATE: August 28,1996 SUBJECT: Woolbright Place PUD - Master Plan Modification File No. MPMD 96-005 Please place the above-referenced request on the September 4, 1996 City Commission agenda for Commission action under Development Plans. NA TURE OF REQUEST Michael Morton, agent for Howard Scharlin trustee/property owner of the Woolbright Place PUD, is requesting approval to modify the previously approved master plan for the Woolbright Place PUD (see Exhibit "A" - letter of request and proposed master plan). The requested modifications are limited to that portion of the PUD that is entitled Pod 1. Pod 1 is a 14.05 acre parcel which is iocated on the east side of Southwest 8th Street and is approximately 2,250 feet north of Woolbright Road (see Exhibit "B" -location map). The changes described are as follows: 1. Change the type of units in Pod 1 from 90 multi-family units to 84 single-family, detached units. The following building and site regulations are proposed for the typical lots in Pod 1: Perimeter Building Setbacks: North property line East property line South property line West property line reduction from 60 feet to 40 feet 20 feet reduction from 20 feet to 15 feet reduction from 40 feet to 25 feet Site and Building Regulations (typical lot); Minimum lot width Minimum lot area Minimum front yard Minimum front yard (to garage) Minimum rear yard Minimum side yard (interior) Minimum side yard ( corner) Minimum living area (AlC) Maximum lot coverage Maximum building height 42 feet 3,990 square feet 15 feet 20 feet 15 feet 6 feet 12 feet 1,000 square feet 40 percent 30 feet Screen enclosure (screen roof) setbacks: Front 15 feet Rear 5 feet Side (interior) 6 feet Side (corner) 12 feet 2, Page 2 Woolbright Place PUD Master Plan Modification Memorandum No. 96-433 File No. 96-005 Pool and Spa setbacks: Front Rear Side (interior) Side (corner) none specified 7 feet 8 feet 7 feet 2. Modify the north landscape buffer as follows: For each one hundred (100) lineal feet of the buffer, two (2) Red Cedar trees (large canopy) and three (3) Sabal Palms have been added (see Exhibit IICII - Proposed North Buffer Plan). The large group of fourteen (14) Slash Pine trees, previously spread out along the entire 75 lineal feet of buffer, has been divided into clusters of three (3) and added to each 100 foot section of the buffer (see Exhibit 11011 - Approved North Buffer Plan). 3. Omittance of the 25 foot wide landscape buffer to have been located at the east, west and north sides of the land titled Open Parce; Area (Undisturbed). 4. Reduction in the width of the landscc::pe buffer'along S.W. 8t';.Street adjacent to lots #44 through #48 and #1 through #7 from 25 feet to 10 feet (I1C landscape material has been specified for the new buffer). 5. Addition of an optional wall or rail fence and project signage at Southwest 8th Street. 6. Addition of a community pool in Pod 1 to serve Pod 1. 7. Request a private road system and installation of an entry gate. 8. Addition of trees and hedging within the ten (10) foot wide landscape buffer easement located along the south and east perimeter of the pod. . BACKGROUND The Woolbright Place PUD consists of 80.34 acres and is approved for a tota; of 656 units (16 duplex units and 640 multi-family units). The 656 units equal a density of 8.16 dwelling units per acre. Pod 1 is currently master plan approved for 90 multi-family units and was split-off as a separate residential parcel within the PUD when 548 of the multi-family units within the ?UD were subdivided for the liThe Vinings at Boynton Beachll project. The Vinings was further subdivided into two (2) phases. Phase One (1) was platted on February 21,1996 and construction is complete. The latest approved master plan for the Woolbright Place PUD is shown in the attached Exhibit IIEII. The following land uses and zoning districts abut the subject property: North - Single-family homes zoned R-1A (Single-Family Residential); East - Vacant land site plan approved for apartments (The Vinings, Phase II) and zoned PUD (Planned Unit Development); South - Vacant land site plan approved for apartments, (The Vinings, Phase II) and zoned PUD; and West - S.W. 8th Street and a water maniJgement tract zoned PUD. The City's Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2.5-Planned Unit Development, states that changes in Planned Unit Developments shall be processed as follows: 3 Page 3 Woolbright Place PUD Master Plan Modification Memorandum No. 96-433 File No. 96-005 "Section 12. Changes in plans. Changes in plans approved as part of the zoning to PUD may be permitted by the Planning and Zoning Board upon application filed by the developer or his successors in interest, prior to the expiration of the PUD classification, but only [after] a finding that any such change or changes are in accord with all regulations in effect when the change or changes are requested and the intent and purpose of the comprehensive plan in effect at the time of the proposed change. Substantial changes shall be proposed as for a new application of PUD zoning. The determination of what constitutes a substantial change shall be within the sole discretion of the City Commission. Non-substantial changes as determined by the City Commission on plans shall not extend the expiration of the eighteen (18) month approval for the PUD classification." Also, pursuant to Resolution No. R95-65, which sets forth an expedited review of development applications submitted to the City by the property owner, the special-schedule established by staff and the applicant for processing this request is as follows: August 16, 1996 Application/plans received (2nd submittal). August 16, 1996 Plans distributed to the Technical Review Committee (TRC). Written comments due to the Planning and Zoning Department at the end or the day of August 23, 1996 for preparation of staff report to commission. August 20, 1996 TRC meeting held. (Note: The expedited process does not require resubmittal by the applicant. The only exception to this would be resubmittal voluntarily by the applicant. The applicant did choose to resubmit this request, therefore, staff comments are a result of reviewing a second submittal set of plans.) September 4, 1996 - City Commission meeting. September 10, 1996 - Planning and Development Board meeting September 17, 1996 - City Commission meeting, if deemed necessary by the city attorney. ANAL YSIS Staff has reviewed this request for consistency with the PUD development standards, and the intent and purpose of Planned Unit Developments as stated in the following sections of Chapter 2.5 of the City's Land Development Regulations: "Section 1. Intent and purpose A Planned Unit Development District (PUD) is established. It is intended that this district be utilized to promote efficient and economical land use, improved amenities, appropriate and harmonious variety in physical development, creative design, improved living environment, orderly and economical development in the City and the protection of adjacent and existing and future City development. The district is suitable for development, redevelopment and conservation of land, water and other resources of the City. Regulations for Planned Unit Developments are intended to accomplish the purposes of zoning, subdivision regulations and other applicable City regulations to the same degree that they are intended to control development on a lot-by-Iot basis. In view of the substantial li Page 4 Woolbright Place PUD Master Plan Modification Memorandum No. 96-433 File No. 96-005 public advantages of Planned Unit Development, :t is the intent of PUD regulatiol"s to promote and encourage development in this form where tracts suitable in size, location and character for the uses and structures proposed are to be planned and developed as unified and coordinated units. Section 9. Internal PUD standards B. INTERNAL LOTS AND FRONTAGE. "Within the boundaries of the PUD, no minimum lot size or minimum, yards shall be required; provided, however, that PUD frontage on dedicated public roads shall observe front yard requirements in accordance with the zoning district the PUD use most closely resembles and that peripheral yards abutting other zoning districts shall be the same as required in the abutting zone." With respect to the changes requested; 1. The change from 90 multi-family units to 84 single-family units represents a reduction of six (6) units. The gross density for the 14.05 acres in Pod 1 would r~duce from 6.40 to 5.98 units per acre. Regarding the proposed building and site regulations and perimeter setbacks, these issues are addressed in detail in Planning and Zoning Departl1'lert comm9nts included in Exhibit "F" - Conditions of Approval. Planning and Zoning Departmen~ comments include recommendations regarding building and site regulations which staff believes are in the best interest of the adjacent neighborhood and the residents of the development. With respect to minimum lot size, it should be noted that the proposed minimu.'ll of 3,990 square feet is below the 4,000 square foot lot area that is presently the smallest lot size allowed for single- family detached homes. 2. The north buffer has been enhanced with the addition of the Red Ceders and Palm, and through the redistribution of the Slash Pines, as changes may create a more dense buffer between the subject project and the adjacent residential development to the north (as shown on the approved buffer plan). Staff also considers the landscape buffer plan proposed by the applicant, subject to staff recommendations, to be compatible with the approved buffer plan (Resolution R92-210) . However the location of the large trees shown on the proposed plan and the approved plan are in conflict with the tree location guidelines established in the FPL brochure "Plant the Right Tree in the Right Place". FPL's objective is to provide reliable and uninterrupted service, and therefore, have developed a brochur~ containing specific tree species that are recommended to be planted within a certain distance of overhead power lines. The brochure indicates that large trees (those trees that are greater than 30 feet at maturity) are recommended to be placed no closer than 30 feet from overhead power lines, medium trees (those trees that are 20 to 30 feet tall at maturity) within 20 feet of the power lines and small trees (those trees that are less than 20 feet tall at maturity) are allowed to be planted under power lines. The Live Oak, Gumbo Limbo, Slash Pine and Red Cedar trees shown on the proposed plan and approved plan are listed in the brochure as large trees, which should not be planted within 30 feet from power lines. Conditions regarding type of species, location of plants, planting specifications (size and quantity), timing for the installation of the north buffer and relocation of the utility easement and or north buffer easement are identified in the Planning and Zoning Department comments specified in Exhibit "F" - Conditions of Approval. 3. The omission of the 25 foot wide approved landscape buffer along the east and north sides of that portion of the project identified as Open Parcel Area (Undisturbed) is inconsistent with the agreement referenced in resolution R92-210, and in particular, where it regards a continuous buffer between the proposed development and the existing development to the north. Although this open area may no longer warrant a buffer, and the existing vegetition on this area may itself represent a buffer, the agreement still establishes the type of buffer to be situated along the north parimeter of the project. As for the interior of this open area, ~ CCl CONSULTANTS, INC. Engineers Planners 5U1veyors Landscape Architects Environmental Consultants 2200 PARK CENTRAL BLVD., N, SUITE 100, POMPANO BEACH, Fl33064, (954} 974-2200. FAX (954) 973-2686 August 2, 1996 -- 1/[':, JL@ rn 0 W U~l . c .:..~ ItM!~lmG AND lONING DEPT. ~ Mr. Michael Haag Planning & Zoning CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Re: Woolbright Place PUD - New Master Plan Modification (POD I) 14-Acre Parcel, Boynton Beach, Florida CCL's Project No. 3425-02 Dear Mr. Haag: Please find enclosed (12) copies of our modified Master Plan for the above~referenced project along with a check in the amount of $500.00 for the review fee. Pursuant to our recent conversations, this is a revision to the previously submitted plans that were reviewed by DRC and City Council over the past four months. The primary revisions to the plans are as follows: I. The 25' landscape buffer located on the north end is now shown on the plans. 2. Pursuant to an agreement with the City Utilities Department, we have rerouted the force main to be within the 25' landscape buffer (see sheet 2 of 2). 3. The smallest lot on the plan is now 42' x 95' which are the seven (7) lots adjacent to the recreation area. 4. The recreation area has been internalized pursuant to comments from the City Council. 5. The landscape buffers and the building setbacks are detailed on the plan and we believe are in keeping with discussions that took place during the review process. Page 8 Woolbright Place PUD (POD 1) File No. MPMD 96-005 - DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 74. To establish, a minimum floor area for the proposed units that is comparable to the minimum floor area required in the single-family homes abutting the project to the north, it is recommended that additional information be added to project summary note number 5 found on sheet MP2 of 2 indicating that 1,250 square feet is the minimum floor area. Also add to note 5 the required square footage regulations listed in Section 4. K. of Chaoter 2 - Zonina of the City's Land develooment Regulations. 75. Provide proper authorization, for the subject request, by submit written verification from the board of directors of the Woolbright Place Master Association, Inc. indicating that Richard C. Wohlfarth, P.E. of CCL Consultants, Inc. is their reoresentative. 76. Submission of a rectified master plan showing compliance with the conditions of approval for the project will be required to be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department, in triolicate, prior to plattina and/or site plan review for the PUD. ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS 77. To be detemimed. ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS 78. To be determined. MEH:bme a:\COMWOOL.\l\lPD Page 6 Woolbright Place PUD (POD 1) File No. MPMD 96-005 DEPARTMENTS 58. To install the approved 25 foot wide landscape buffer plan, as identified in Resolution R92-210, in compliance with the FPL guidelines regarding proximity of large trees to overhead power lines, the location of the buffer, berm and large trees within the buffer will have to be relocated so that the row of large trees shown on the north side of the plan are 30 feet away from the power lines. The Slash Pine, Live Oak and Gumbo Limbo trees identified on the approved plan are listed as large trees in the FPL brochure. It is recommended that prior to plat approval the applicant submit a site plan review request that depicts the buffer planting plans for all areas of the project that include buffer plantings on single-family platted lots. The submittal shall include planting plans of the north buffer that have been reviewed and approved by FPL. If the FPl approval requires trees to be omitted or a reduction in size specifications or change in location of tree material the north buffer easement and plantings shall be moved into the site a distance consistent with FPl specifications. The below listed planting changes and specification are recommended to be added to the approved buffer plan to clarify a typical section of buffer plan. Trees: First one hundred lineal feet of buffer plant three (3) (fifty foot on center), 12 to 14 foot tall Live Oak trees placed three feet from the north side of the 25 foot wide buffer easement and plant two (2) (fifty foot on center alternating spacing from the oaks located on the north side of the buffer), 12 to 14 foot tall Live Oak trees placed three feet north of the south side of the buffer easement. The next seventy-five feet of the buffer install a grouping fourteen (14) (ten feet on center), 12 to 14 foot tall Slash Pines (7 on each side of the top of the berm). For the next one hundred feet of buffer plant three (3) (fifty foot on center), 12 to 14 foot tall Gumbo Limbo trees placed three feet from the north side of the 25 foot wide buffer and plant two (2) (fifty foot on center alternating spacing from the gumbo limbo located on the north side of the buffer), 12 to 14 foot tall Gumbo Limbo trees placed three feet north of the south side of the buffer. The previous three sections of tree plantings shall be repeated the entire length of the landscape buffer easement. Hedges: Install, fifty-one (51), twenty-four inch to thirty-six (24 to 36) inch tall Coco Plum plants along the top of the four foot tall berm and space the plants 2 feet on center. The plants shall form a continuous hedge row the entire length of the buffer. For each 100 foot or 75 foot section of the buffer Coco Plum and Wax Myrtle plants shall be alternated. Shrubs: Spot plant forty (40), forty-eight to sixty (48 to 60) inch tall, at time of planting, containerized Saw Palmetto palms around each group of 14 Slash Pine trees (20 palms on each side of the top of the berm). Install, forty-eight (48), thirty-six inch to forty-eight (36 to 48) inch tall Randia plants, five (5) foot on center, alternating 12 plants each side ofthe top ofthe berm at 25 foot intervals. For each 75 or 100 foot section of the buffer alternate Randia, Myrsine, Florida Privet, Wild Coffee or Necklace Pod plants. The shrubs shall be placed in a manner to form a meandering shape of the buffer as viewed from the plan view. Ground Cover: Omit the Lantana plants (deciduous) and replace with a total of two hundred (200), 12 to 18 inch tall Liriope plants (evergreen). The Liriope shall be planted on 12 inch centers with 100 plants installed on each side of the berm at each 100 foot or 75 foot typical section. The plants are to be placed to accentuate the meandering shape of the buffer. One hundred (100) Fakahatchee grass or Liriope plants may be alternated each 100 foot or 75 foot section of the buffer. It is recommended that this entire buffer be installed prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy of any recreation structure, sales model facility or of a residential unit, whichever comes first. 59. To ensure that the north property line landscape buffer is continuous at the rear of lots 8 and 9, either move the proposed city utility easement six (6) feet to the south so that the city utility easement does not encroach the landscape buffer easement or re-route the utility easement to run north and south between lots 9 and 10. 60. It is recommended that the approved landscape buffer easement and planting be continued along the east and north sides of the land identified on the submitted plans as Open Parcel Area (Undisturbed). The buffer should terminate at the east side of S. W. 8th Street at the northwest corner of the PUD. This recommendation may be omitted if the City Forester/Environmentalist determines that the existing landscape material located on the ODen Darcel creates a buffer eaual to the aDDroved buffer. INCLUDE REJECT Page 5 Woolbright Place PUD (POD 1) File No. MPMD 96-005 DEPARTMENTS 57. To install the buffer plan proposed by the applicant (25 feet wide abutting the north property line of the PUD) in compliance with the FPL guidelines regarding planting trees near overhead power lines, the tree materials identified on the plan would have to be changed. The reason the tree material should be changed is that the north portion of the proposed buffer overlaps a five foot wide utility easement that has overhead power lines. One-half of the five (5) foot wide utility easement occupies the north 2.5 feet of lots 8 through 22. It is recommended that prior to plat approval the applicant submit a site plan review request that depicts the buffer planting plans for all areas of the project that include buffer plantings on single-family platted lots. The submittal shall include planting plans for the north buffer that have been reviewed and approved by FPL. If the FPL approval requires the omission of trees, reduction in tree size specifications or change in location of tree material the, north buffer easement and plantings shall be moved into the site a distance that would allow FPL to approve the proposed planting scheme and recommended planting specifications. The below listed planting changes and specifications are recommended to be added to the proposed plan to describe a typical 1 00 foot section of the buffer. Trees: Specify the two (2) Red Cedar trees, three (3) Slash Pines, one (1) Live Oak, two (2) Gumbo Limbo and three (3) Sabal Palm trees shall be twelve (12) feet tall at time of planting. Hedges: Show fifty-one (51), twenty-four inch to thirty-six (24 to 36)inch tall Coco Plum plants along the top of the four foot tall berm and space the plants 2 feet on center. The plants shall form a continuous hedge row the entire length of the buffer. Shrubs: The 24 Saw Palmetto plants shown on the plan shall be thirty to thirty-six (30-36) inches tall (15 gallon) at time of planting. Install forty-eight (48), thirty-six inch to forty-eight (36 to 48) inch tall Myrsine plants, spaced five (5) foot on center, alternating 12 plants each side of the top of the berm 25 foot intervals. For each 100 lineal feet of buffer alternate Myrsine, Randia, Wax Myrtle, Florida Privet, Wild Coffee and Necklace Pod plants. The shrubs shall be placed in a manner to form a meandering shape of the buffer as viewed from the plan view. Ground Cover: Omit the Purple and Yellow Lantana plants (deciduous) and replace with a total of two hundred (200),12 to 18 inch tall Liriope plants (evergreen). The Liriope shall be planted on 12 inch centers with 100 plants installed on each side of the berm for each 75 or 100 foot section of the buffer. The Liriope plants shall be installed to accentuate the meandering shape of buffer. It is recommended that this entire buffer be installed prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy of any recreation structure, sales model facility or of a residential unit whichever comes first. INCLUDE REJECT Page 4 Woolbright Place PUD (POD 1) File No. MPMD 96-005 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 48. On sheet MP2 of 2, modify general note 1 to indicate the 0.32 acre private recreation tract, the 1.47 acre open area parcel and the 2.64 acre private road tract located within Pod 1 are owned, operated and perpetually maintained by the projects homeowner's association. Include any other land area that is proposed to be common land for the development. 49. To clarify general note 4 found on MP2 of 2, move the note to sheet MP1 of 2 and show on the plan the location size, and shape of the medians adjacent to the street frontage of the subject PUD. It is recommended that the last three words of note 4 be changed from homeowner's association to Woolbright Place Master Association, Inc. 50. Prior to plat approval of Pod 1, Homeowner's Association documents will be required to be submitted for review by staff. The documents shall comply with the specifications identified in Chapter 2.5 - Planned Unit Development, Section 6 and Chapter 5 - Platting. Article V, Section 1 D 11 of the City's Land Development Regulations. 51. On sheet MP1 of 2 modify general note 9 by omitting the last sentence and adding the words lias defined on each plat within the PUD" before the period at the end of the first sentence. 52. To clarify the issue regarding location of fences on perimeter lots within Pod 1, move general note 9 found on sheet MP1 of 2 to sheet MP2 of 2 and place it below the typical lot drawings depicting lots with perimeter landscape buffer easements. 53. To clarify the areas of the project that will require site plan review, add text to general note 12 found on sheet MP2 of 2 indicating that site plan review is also required for the site wall or fence. landscaping for the open parcel and project signage located at the entrance to the site. 54. To provide privacy for lots 1 and 48. it is recommended that a common ground tract of land be shown on both sides of the entrance road. This can be accomplished by moving the adjacent row of lots to the north and south. 55. To provide privacy for lot 84 which is abutting the east side of the proposed private recreation pool, it is recommended that either the pool and cabana exchange locations or the cabana and pool be rotated ninety (90) degrees in a clockwise direction. 56. Specify on sheet MP1 of 2. the approved total peak hour trips that are allocated for the PUD and indicate how may trips are generated for the existing and proposed development for each Darcel or pod identified on the master plan. Page 3 Woolbright Place PUt) (POD 1) File No. MPMD 96-005 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 34. To provide a more efficient layout of the project regarding street design for services provided by the city such as fire rescue, emergency services and sanitation pick-up, it is recommended that the lot design in the northeast and southwest portions of the project be redesigned by omitting lots or creating pie shaped lots on a street radius rather than allowing the short dead end streets that do not have a cul-de-sac turn-around. 35. Submit a landscape plan for the area identified as open parcel area (u:"}d~stUTbed). The plan shall include grading elevations, type of landscape material, plant mate!lial specifications inclUding type of lawn grass and irrigation requirements. 36. All parking spaces provid~'d or required for the recreation pool area shall be designed to I comply with the city regulations specified in the City's Land Development Regulations, Chapter 23 - Parking Lots. Amend the plan accordingly. 37. To maintain consistency regarding the building setback for the perimeter of the project it is recommended that the proposed forty (40) foot building setback remain around the perimeter of the portion of the site titled Open Parcel Area (Undisturbed), including the south property line of the proposed tract. 38. On sheet MP1 of 2, identify the new name of Morton's Way, as specified in resolution R96-112. 39. On sheet MP1 of 2, change general note 1 and 3 to reflect the method the developer is or has complied with the city's recreation requirement for the entire PUD. In describing the approved or proposed method, delineate the compliance by showing the computations per each pod or parcel within the PUD. 40. It is recomr.r~fl"ded that a twenty (20) foot setback be established around the recreation pool area. Show and dil1:lension on sheet MP2 of 2"the 20 foot setback for structures and all recreation amenities. , 41. It is recommended *hat the depth of lots 71 through 77 be reduced 0.5 feet to allow ~he depth (If lots 78 ~hrough 84 to be increased ~rom 95 feet to 95.5 feet which would establish a minimum lot size for the development of 4,U37.5 s<;uare feet rather than ~I'e '! ~ proposed 3,990 sq~are feet. The present minimum Ic~; size, in the city for single-family! detache~ units, is 4,000 square feet. i 42. To clarify the> minimum standards for the PUD, amend the project summary nlite 7 found on sheet MP2 of 2 as follows: Minimum lot size: 42' X 95.5' (4,037.5 square feet) Minimum lot frontage 42'* * Lot frontage shall be measured at the 15 foot front setback line for the following irregular shaped lots; 1-8 and 45-48. 43. On sheet MP1 of 2, add a general note indicating that the PUD is subject to the conditions of approval of City of Boynton Beach Resolution R96-112 regarding the reduction in the width of Morton's Way. 44. Add to ,the master plan submittal the previously approved landscape plans for S. W. 8th Street, the water management area, lake plantings and the preservation area requirements. 45. Add to the site data fOfJnd on sheet MP1 of 2, the density (number of dwelling units per ~ I I acre) represented for the gross acreage of the PUD. Also identify the land use classification of the pu~ as defined on the City's Future Land Use Map. 46. On sheet MP1 of 2, amend the south border of the Woolbright Place PUD on the west ' side of S. W. 8th Street to correctly identify the property line that separates the Woolbright Place PUD from the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD as established by Ordinance 89-18. Ordinance 89-18 is the ordinance that established the PUD. Rectify the Woolbright Place PUD plat documents to correspond with Ordinance 89-18. It is recommended that the land shown on the master plan within the Church Parcel that is not zoned PUD be rezoned, by the applicant, from PCD to PUD, unless otherwise determined unnecessary by the city attorney. Amend the legal description, plans and site data on sheet MP1 of 2 accordingly. 47. Sheet MP1 of 2 indicates that Pod 1 will have 5 common recreation amenities; however, the plans onlv reflect a pool. Correct the plans accordinQly. - Page 2 Woolbright Place PUD (POD 1) File No. MPMD 96-005 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 17. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the city's code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following: site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and traffic control devices. Permits required from agencies such as the FOOT, PBC, SFWMD and any other permitting agency shall be included with your permit reQuest. 18. Revise documents to reflect all comments. 19. Verify which roads require naming (for mail delivery) with U.S. Postal Service. 20. Indicate name of subdivision. Chap.3, Sec.3A, pg. 3-4. 21. Show location, names and elevations of adjacent subdivisions. Chap.3, Sec.3E, pg.3-4. 22. Show topographical conditions on tract. Chap.3, Sec.3G, pg.3-4. 23. Provide generalized statement of subsurface conditions. Chap.3, Sec.3M, pg.3-5. 24. Show utilities on or adjacent to the tract. Chap.3, Sec.30, pg.3-5. 25. Dead end streets are prohibited. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.10T, pg.6-14. 26. Permits must be obtained for work within RO.W. Chap.22, Art.II, Sec.7A, pg.22-3. 27. Complete irrigated landscaping in S.W. 8th Street RO.W. including medians and areas outside pavement edges prior to recording of plat. This includes entire RO.W. from approximately the south edge of the 14.18 acre church parcel to north terminus of S.W. 8th Street construction. Landscape design must be approved by the City Forester prior to installation, and the installation itself must be accepted by the City Forester prior to recording of plat. 28. Show location of relocated 12' utility easement approved by Resolution R95-66. 29. It is recommended that the streets are paved in two lifts. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: 30. The applicant should submit landscape and irrigation plans for S.W. 8th Street medians and right-of-ways. The plans should be reviewed and approved by the Technical Review committee (TRC) for any possible conflicts. The plans should show quantities, specifications and species of trees with any understory plantings. A note should be on the plans that the maintenance of the landscape/irrigation improvements will be provided by the applicant's commercial association. 31. The undisturbed open area portion of the site can be evaluated as a vegetative, visual barrier only after all of the exotic vegetation has been removed from the site. There may be voids in the visual buffer after the clearing of exotics that will have to be landscaped with native species and receive water until established. The present elevation of this open area is higher than S.W. 8th Street and may change as part of the project. These activities may affect whether the undisturbed open area can be used as a visual buffer rather than the applicant planting/irrigating a new buffer along the western perimeter of the project. The project should continue in the normal review PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 32. As the developer has chosen not to provide five private basic park requirements, the submittal does not qualify for one-half credit for private recreation. 33. Based on the number of single family units, the following recreation fee applies: 84 single-family units X .0180 = 1.512 acres As the developer has already paid one-half of the fee, his dedication is: 1.512 divided by 2 = .756 acres. Fee in lieu of land is recommended. EXHIBIT "F" Conditions of Approval Project name: Woolbright Place PUD (POD 1) File number: MPMD 96-005 Reference: The plans consist of 3 sheets identified as 2nd Review, Master Plan Modification. File #MPMD 96-005 with an August 16, 1996 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I PU8L1C WORKS '~F UTILITIES Comments: 1. The utility easement located in the rear of units 8 and 9 shall be located so that large canopy-style trees do not overhang into the easement. Palm trees and shrubs may be placed within the easement, but not over the force main. The easement shall also extend at least 10 feet from the force main to the easement line on the building side, so as to prevent encroachment by future structures including pools, screen rooms, etc.. 2. The same conditions shall apply to that portion of the easement running in a general north/south direction (i.e. no overhang by large trees into the easement). FIRE . NOI POLICE Comments: 3. In regard to the entrance security gate, a system that is accessible via telephone by the police/fire/utility departments. The telephone number would be made available to police/fire/utility communications. When entrance to the area is necessary, communications would activate the gates by telephoning the given number. This type of system allows for maximum security and less number of people knowing the telephone/access number. DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Comments: 4. No building structure, screen enclosure, pool, or portion thereof is allowed within setbacks, either now or in the future. Chap.1, Art.II,pg.1-30. 5. Project shall have underground utilities to residential units. Chap. 2.5, Sec.9E, pg.2.5-7. 6. Show the locations of all temporary structures or permanent structures having a temporary use. Provide a statement outlining the temporary use and when they will be removed. Chap.3, Art.lV, Sec.3R, pg.3-5. 7. Provide a master stormwater management plan. Chap.3, Art.IV, Sec.3T, pg.3-6. 8. Site plan review and approval required. Chap.4, Sec.2, pg.4-1. 9 Plat review and approval required. Chap.5, Art.II, Sec.1, pg.5-1. 10. Provide certification by Developer's Engineer that drainage plan complies with all city codes and standards. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec. SA, pg.6-7 and Chap.23, Art.IIF, pg.23-8. 11. Locate all drainage easements. Chap.6, Art.lV, Sec.68, pg.6-9. 12. Minimum street right-of-way width for a local street with 2 mountable curbs is 50 feet; with swales minimum right-of-way width is 60 feet. Chap.6, Art.lV, Sec.1 DC, pg.6-11. 13. Need SFWMD and LWDD acceptance prior to Engineering approval. Chap.6, Art.VII, SecA8, pg.6-24. 14. Applicant's attention is directed to Chap.7, pg.7-1 regarding surety requirements. 15. All landscaped areas shall be provided with an automatic water supply system. Chap.7.5, Art. II, Sec.58, pg.7.5-14. 16. Provide stop signs and stop bars in accordance with the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices". Chap.23 Art. II 82 00.23-7. E X H I BIT II F II i I f I JII I J II I r ! ~ ! I " :1 . en I , 0 I :, I 0 I . 1:1 I a i Jo ~, . ... .. "1 I Jo 'r !. .' I I J II .' if ;; . . I' : i r I I . & . , . I . r &i . i i I~ ~ i : : I.; I , I. I' .:u: I!. . .. ; :,~;:i: :;~:~: ';f ' ';;:;:i~~i;:::!:t,;~i!:i ;i'. ".' I. .: I.., ,0 1:!jIlY" !"r., "j:t-' " . . .. .;;.' 'i! .,.' ';"';;:!!~1:::Ji!;'::'li!!i! ;'; .' m: ~m !;? ~::~ m~ m~ m~ I I:" 'l:. ,," ".: l.!! 'F! '=1" I 'I' '11 t' ,. .." .1. '. .. ;; ;;; q i'.: F' ~;: ~h i ;;; , i,H.' " !h '/ H .. i': =.1 I: : i . . ~ ; I I ~ i I I ! t I > 1J 1J ~ C ~ ~ :c 1J !; Z ., IiI' ': f! ,IiI. II If i,l II 'I', I ! ,'i,1 I , fll' I . rul I " 'II ~ I If I [ . ; . . t :J ~ ; ;=n .1, :J1 r I~ s: -c . ..... : I::; ,~ i ~ · I. - II~i.i :I~!~~ : I"'" ; ~ .;i;jj Jg ~. : iil::; r. !:2 ~ . :!.::; IJ t' lit .~ ~ :;;I!;;: ~: . ;~--~. ~;j! ~ ;i ~~', . I~';I; 111:l.I I :) I :1 '. lIS r i =~!:j ~ f 'i 0, ;1 /'-- '--.' : ~ ip~-;f I - fIt I ~I. Hf~ ,'s I' ~.. .. . t~ !;: j-:..f it b . ~ Jj ;~ \ ~~~7' '1:>.a'C" ~ ~ c ..,.,.. e-.~.J. ,j . to - 1I0ATONS WIlY r- -...,. i' , I \ \ lili'llll i.!!lli ,./ . Jif1li ~'~i Ii '. ~ " . \ , ~ ~ .. ; e , . . ~ ~ , rii 'i ~ 5'- dil ~ ... d ;i t i i Cl . a ~ :a , ~ . ( (' . . c '" '~ ~ \\ i\_~".. ~ J r .! f I : ;1 i' ! 1/ : - ~!.:~: J'-'! ;:~IJ f.l, ,,;;, ,~:Ii :ffB ~ WOOLBRIGHT PLACE P.U.D. f~ aOYNTON aEACll. FLORIOA . _.....) II"STfRI'LAN ~>~~ TRADEWlNDS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCnoN CORPORATION . ~~/ .... i IP "j ~ =". iiljii ~ i .,11. i ; I! lIiil'.' III I :. i ;1 I illll= g I I :-:. ; ... ;; :. I' · !' ; Jo i r .!; II . .: I .. i i . i: : I : e ii . ~I~~I:;;U :r~~ hr! d ; I I:;~ ~ii I fll! . i rrl: ill J t " ...,. 0 ~'-"':~-=:". " i '.'~ i ;~ : I;;; 5i;;I'.:ii = sll II .. .. i ~ '" ~~ ij ii : ~i '.. !!l . ;; .. t. ~) <1 ~ i ~ \ } ~ ID j In lil ~ 10 ~ ... o o + II: ~ ::l ::l I I I 1< 8 ::l o ~ ~ ~ l; I\l ~ lii e ~ z i ;; ! i ~:a. ~~ ~ ':I :r ::r~ >>,. .. 'Ii ~ + :;: ::a I I ~! ... b ,'. a : ,~~ ... ~ ..' :.-"tt J>~ 1-~ :~o tJ.:t "~b ~ ~~ ;; I .., ... ~ ~.. ~3 ~ ~.... .. . :ar-.. ~. ~~ -c. ~ :Q- ~ "< ~ .. -c:. E X H I BIT II E II I~ un z I 0 ~ -0 :rJ 0 -0 m ~ r- - z m liU OJ Ii c: -n .>> .1 " m J:J -0 > Z ~ 0 bj flfl :D .., ..;, - G> r ., ~ ~ "tJ f ~ r f il -0 !. I c c f q ii - -- ". E X H I BIT "D" 1 1 r \ E X H I BIT "0" E X H I BIT "B" !II~ ls'l .I. I!i ~I I 'i!'lil 's ; f i I I.. &! [I ~ i ! I I I I ~... : 19 I ~ I I iliil~I!;lII! ii I il i!i!liillil,iUi Ii I ,1111 i :nt il I iil!l!l!lalli .! h Ii"lltllllll I i;lh'llllill"II'1 'fl:'. I "II , 'ill; "1111, 111!:llill!lIIII.11 II . 11.,1 I " !1111'lllil,ldl.'I . I" "' II i lili,I;;I;I; I! lil,I,01IillI1ldl h ! 111111' '0.1111 II II ... "'111 , II!il!~IIU I! "11 '1 I I " I !~ I~(V ~fm . I :-'" .. ... '~""'''~ ; ( . . " -:. '\ " ~:~.-; I~ ..J! %~ ." cl~ 1lI~ ~-c is ~ E ~ I ~. g I i I I I' f I~ - _ -r-"-; ~::i' . \-.._.._.._.._u .._.._ I ((r-.----_u_--. i. III 1.111111.11111 !, I J 11111 III It" ; I I ! iii I iiiii I iiil! I -i."''' ~ '." ~--.-o..~. It I, . ~.-; ';U:~ i r II A' ~ ',.; .- --,' ~ ~ j; '.. ~ ~ ..... ....... I I I I ., " I }, i 'f . '" . 1 ...' .., . J - I -:'l I , ... I i I , .......... .. I .' /,: ...... , , I I . ',- I .. ... , I ..... I .. ~ - I ~ ~ \I '\I . I i II I \ ~ I ; 1 : I I t 11~ \ I ~ 1 III .1 I I .-11 \" ~ I I I :. l \1, I, \ 1 I' \1 \ II " , \ . \ \ I . , , , -c JJ .,0 ~1J o CJJ m o I 't, I I I I I I \~ i < ~Il/'. ,I . Y , , I ',,- I '..../ I - I I I :1 I I I I ~ · III i ! IllS I I ! III ~ . ,II 'I t' -. Iii . II I I ;Ill i 1I111111i i'il : _III It! 1'111111,1 ~ I I II II il : !1I1. I ! I: II :'111 U.'5HU Sill: · .: I II H~u h : I'-II ; II n&li I I 1'1 - I' I ;1 i'!J"I'II'lIllll'lIl'lll 11...11"11,,1'11"1"1 1'1' il' Ujlhll' :1.i!I'li Illilll ., III. .111'.1" I Ii,' !J1j!!III!;I!ih'lljlllt!l! I,' 1!llllil ~11~;tIII"lldl P 1111 'llIh1tl'llo'I"I.:1 II 5'1111811111111,'1: lllla: , · 'IIU JlII';1 I I ! II ;II!lU!lilil!III~I!": III ! illi!!!ii!iliiliiiilll!: I 1'111 ~ I I .,. H . PO I IE I II i; i I II 1111,111 11111 I I il I = II I I I I 111. I I .. I I 11111 . . I. i I i I 1111111, ; ! ! i I ~ I 5 i i I i II iill ! , ... fA II , .1 I . eiil!rnl &a fi I ItJ m~ ,HUtnll r~ I' I~~iill ,ill Jjl~ ~hj ,:~!llii ~l it II~II,I, 01. I III .. I ! E III~ I I I , ; I'III111 'Ii ! : ! ! h ~ 1III '~, ,I, ' t i I :.. e ,: ~ '~' '\~ ,71"'- " i i" I ;:. ,\~ '~ I II. II n'\ II; I \ \'\~~' ---....-- I I(f' ..\~ 'I ' I', I \\ - : I Illi I,.:~~,:;' t~' J' I,ll i 1'1 I I .,.', I;I~ 'Iii I'. I III~I! r')il Ii ,f"I'i\ ' ,', .1- !il!1 11;1~ II 11- ~ I I I. R 'd\ 'I I' ",il~l ~ I I a Ii i I I I ,( ! I .., , '''Ii ,_ " · 1I I, I' .. I i I 0 I . I ,r 11'1, l....' '111 'I ~ ,I. III I B I I I j I " - -' . I ~ 'Pol' R r. il~" l ~ I " ./1 ....:~- -----...:-~ I !;II .. ,I :1, .. Ili'!f rl,', i;i;F-~JJ ii~ ~ Ii & Iii -.' 1!1, i : ,\.. '\\11.1 ,III 1'1 ._.~,~.~'. _;.1, I .Illj i ~ Li-'''JII~-: :L~_~!i?"-T; I ~ '11111 . : j; -r i !' : ~I I I i := I I · · ij. fj"':" i! I I · "'" .... . ", , ~. g.. I ,I II , .': \:, "". " . .... ,., .d.1 j!I ~ '0 ~.5I.~TJlPoyt AV' ..::::=c.j \ ~ \:. ( ....-=..... _..___'04 \~~\ \~~ . \\\ ~\ 'S"\\ P 'IP- i J - .1' ,& ~'J ,ft . ~I "~'~-' II ',,~ II ; 'I ' , IE j l- .'~(~~~ lit ~ J \ . .~ '" ... tJ.! . tit"'" , . I . \ \ '10 ~ .1 ~ I +. . \ .. Ii I. a, - " I .~ - I t I iii lit III Ia I!U III: ,III ,-I "\ ~ .. i :II Q 11 ~" ............ , , . ~ :J ( , ( '~ CJ " t t ~ ...... N ! " two a L . . , II M' , L A II r' PM'" ,. . C C L CONSULTANTS JNt ... ~ 0 I V I II II' N. .. ..,.,. II. r... ...Aa.. . ....... ........ .......... -. : II i I~U hI...... ... ........-- ,.... " ! ... ,. S , L R P L " N ...... I-~--. -- .....--,,~ .......- I~t...........-.--.!:.~_. . _.'_.. .__.____ I""'__._._~____~_.._____~~'_~"'..c.. .~___,....:!!!.~~ "!!,~L_.!.!!!!!!!"---- I. Mr. Michael Haag August 2, 1996 Page two While this letter is trying to identi~ the major ch~ges and p~ints of interest to ~;~ your review, there may be other changes that will come out dunng the review process. I As we discussed, Mr. Morton is making a presentation to the County Commission on August 6th, to show them the proposed changes and how we have reacted to some of their comments. It is our hope that at this meeting we can get the Commission to acknowfedge, subject to the review process, that they are at least reasonably in favor of this new concept in order to allow us to proceed. At this time it is our hope that by making the submission today that we will be on the August 13th Development Review Committee meeting agenda. Given the history of this project, Mr. Morton would like to go to City Council on August 20th so that we can proceed to the Planning Commission on September lOth for approval. . Thank you for your help on this matter. We look forward to meeting with you in the near future to discuss the ability of meeting the above schedule. Meanwhile, if you have any questions or comments please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, CCL Consultants, I~c. -~? ~~ ----- - Richard C. Wohlfarth, P .E. President RCW/ddp Encl. cc: Michael Morton Tim Kelly CCl CONSULTANTS, INC. '.>',)..{}.". .J PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-396 TO: TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMBERS Carrie Parker, City Manager Bob Eichorst, Public Works Director Al Newbold, Building Division William Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer Sgt. Marlon Harris, Police Department John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Chief Field Insp. Mike Haag, Planning & Zoning Department Jerzy Lewicki, Planning & Zoning Department William Hukill, Development Department FROM: Tambri J. Heyden, AICP Planning & Zoning Director DATE: August 6, 1996 SUBJECT: Administration Technical Review Committee Meeting - Tuesday, August 6, 1996. On August 6, 1996, at 9: 00 A. M., a staff -only meeting to discuss the submittal below will be held in the 2nd Floor Conference Room, Room 201, Mangrove Park School. 1. Old Business None 2. New Business A. New Site Plan: 1. PROJECT: Boynton Commons PUD LOCATION: The southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and Congress Avenue AGENT: Land Design South OWNER: Bill Ray Winchester, Elsie A.Winchester DESCRIPTION: Request for site plan approval to construct a 213,650 square foot retail center including five (5) leased out parcel buildings on 22.885 acres. NOTE: As previously stated in Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 96-393, written comments for item Blare to be returned to the Planning and Zoning Director no later than 5:00 P.M., Tuesday August 13, 1996. B. Conditional Use Application: 1. PROJECT: St. Joseph's Episcopal Church PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-279 (,opt 6. 't f f2P< 11\ ~O< r'f'- q(," ,vi ~~D li- t\ Agenda Memorandum for May 21, 1996, City Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker City Manager FROM: Tambri J. Heyden -rbli Planning and Zoninimrector DATE: May 16, 1996 SUBJECT: Woolbright Place PUD - MPMD 96-002 Master Plan Modification (Pod 1 change from multi-family to single-family units) The above-referenced item is on the table for the May 21, 1996 City Commission agenda. Since the last Commission meeting when this was tabled, Mr. Morton has provided the attached landscape buffer plan in Exhibit 1 in response to comment 34 in Exhibit E. The plan reflects a significant change in attractiveness, quantity and quality of landscaping, besides a reduction in width from 25 feet to 10 feet, from the approved plan that resulted from a settlement agreement between the City and Intervenor Gary Lehnertz, as documented in Resolution #92-210. To accommodate the late submittal of the proposed buffer plan, I forward to you the attached substitution of wording for comment 34. A new Exhibit E (attached) is provided for this purpose and easy reference. TJH:dim Attachments xc: Central File lI:CCagmcm. Woo E X H I BIT .. 111 ~~ ~ a -' a CSl - ::3 . \3"" tS::l ~ Q) - ~ 11 ::J 3 ct to<' \j 1- & ~ ~ ~ ::S-\j ~ d C ~ D Q) ~ r S' Q) --" Q ~ ::3 ~ (j) (') tl..) -c:J Q) QJ c -+:. -+:. Q) -.. ~ tl..) ::3 ~ I\> '< l'J ~ IE'" Iii! :Hif ~I"! ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~1 -<g' 1,[ -<JJ f~ I~ ii ~~ H: 'q UI ~ II .... Q') . q ... " ~ . q ~ ..../j I :/ ,/ ~ Cl ~ ~ ~ ""a:3 c: ~s & K):3 ~ ~ r ~ J ./ !iT Ii Jl. II ,If f'. ------ J .:-'. - . _. '" ' ..... ~ . " ... q i i:..~.i ' C3 .'( ~"~~i Iq ~ ..~ I / ,". ;':- J .. \ CI ~ Jj T f I i I i ~ ~ I -.--.- \~ . \i 7\] >~ aa lUlU g' --r- I i I l 1 . I '3 (0 ~- -- Il ~~ .z 1'--- I I "'0 ]] o g m o m c: =H m :tJ -0 ~ Z o " ~ m z o ~ "t] :rJ o 1:] m ~ C z m o " ~ i ~ ." ~ m ~ o REVISED E X H I BIT II Ell ': EXHIBIT "E" Conditions of A{)proval Project name: Woolbright Place PUD File number: MPMD 96-002 . Reference:The submittal consists of a letter si~ned by Michael Morton. dated March 22. 1996 and three sheets prepared hv CCL Consultants Inc. sheets 1 of 2 and 2 of 2 pre~ared h~ Brett Nehi; dated March 20. 1996 and sheet 1 of 1 prepared by Louis R. Campanile. Jr _ dated _Qril 8. 199_ DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS Comments: NONE UTILITIES Comments: 1. Plan shall show existing utilities on or adjacent to the tract, and the proposed points of connection to the existing water and sewer mains, (LDR Chapter 3, Art. IV, Sec.3(O)). 2. The proposed landscape buffer and utility easement on the north property line will not allow access to a proposed sanitary sewer force main. Unobstructed access to utility facilities must be provided. Rerouting of the force main may be required, (Sec.26.33(a)). 3. The utility easement shown between lots 19 and 20 shall be a minimum of twenty feet (20') or twice the depth of the proposed utility pipe which ever is greater, (LDR Chapter 6, Art.IV, Sec.6(A)). FIRE Comments: NONE POLICE Comments: NONE ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 4. No building structure, screen enclosure, pool, or portion thereof is allowed within setbacks, either now or in the future. Chap.l, Art.II,pg.I-30 5. Project shall have underground facilities to residential units. Chap.2.5, Sec.9E,pg.2.5-7 6. Show the locations of all temporary structures or permanent structures having a temporary use. Provide a statement outlining the temporary use and when they will be removed. Chap.3,Art.IV,Sec.3R,pg.3-5 7. Provide a master stormwater management plan. Chap.3,Art.IV ,Sec.3T ,pg.3-6 8. Site plan review & approval required. Chap.4,Sec.2,pg.4-1 9. Plat review and approval required. Chap.5,Art.1I,Sec.l, pg.5-1 10. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and collector streets. Chap.6,Art.III,Sec.llA,pg.6-3 Page 2 of 9 Conditions of Approval Woolbright Place PUD DEPAH.TMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 11. Provide Certification by Developer's Engineer that drainage plan complies with all City codes & standards. Chap.6,Art.IV,Sec.5A,pg.6-7 and Chap.23,Art.IIF ,pg.23-8 12. Locate all drainage easements. Chap.6,Art.IV ,Sec.6B, pg.6-9 13. Minimum street right-of-way width for a local street with 2 mountable curbs is 50 feet not 40 feet as shown; with swales minimum right-of-way width is 60 feet. Chap.6,Art.IV,Sec.I0C,pg.6-11 14. Minimum cul-de-sac ROW diameter is 100'. Chap.6,Art.IV,Sec.I0D,pg.6-12 15. Need SFWMD & LWDD acceptance prior to Engineering approval. Chap.6,Art. VII,Sec.4B,pg.6-24 16. Applicant's attention is directed to Chap.7,pg.7-1 regarding surety requirements. 17. All landscaped areas shall be provided with an automatic water supply system. Chap.7.5,Art.II,Sec.5B,pg.7.5-14 18. Provide stop signs and stop bars in accordance with the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices". Chap.23, Art.I1B2,pg.23-7 BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 19. Maximum square footage for entrance wall sign shall be 32 sq. ft. 20. Since the square footage of the lot proposed is closer to an R-2 zoning, the Building Division suggests that maximum lot coverage meet the 40% maximum. 21. As to the question whether or not this is a substantial modification, we will support whatever the other divisions agree upon. I)ARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 22. The developer has already received one-half credit for private recreation. Multi-family unit PODs 2A and 28 already show privatized recreation sufficient to qualify for one-half credit, but restrict the recreation provided to the multi-family unit residents only. In order to qualify for one-half credit for POD 1, the developer is oblillated to provide a minimum of five basic park requirements suitable for the future residents of this section. Page 3 of 9 Conditions of Approval Woolbright Place PUD DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 23. The following recreation elements are shown on the plan: 1. Pool 2. Sand volleyball court 3. Family picnic area 4. Playground area 5. Health trail The recreation elements listed above are insufficient to meet the needs of the single-family units. The Recreation Department cannot recommend one-half credit for private recreation provided at this time. The Recreation Department recommends a minimum 1,300 square feet meeting hall be added to the recreation elements in lieu of either the health trail, volleyball court of picnic area in order to strengthen the recreation package sufficiently for the department to recommend one-half credit. The health trail will need to include marked distances so the user will know how far they have travelled. The trail should be asphalt or other hard surface. 24. Based on the number of single-family units, the following additional recreation fees would be applicable if the developer does not qualify for one-half credit: 85 single-family units X .0180 = 1.530 acres. Since the developer has already paid one-half of the recreation fee, he would be responsible for 1.530 divided by 2 = .765 acres. Fee in lieu of land is recommended. 25. If the final recreation package includes a children's play area and family picnic area, then additional details would have to be provided to insure that recreation equipment would be of commercial quality and of sufficient size to meet the need of the community. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: 26. It is recommended that the reduction of the north pun landscape buffer width from 25 feet wide to 10 feet wide not be approved. 27. It is recommended that the reduction of the landscape buffer between POD 1 and POD 2B from 20 feet to 10 feet wide not be approved. 28. It is recommended that the reduction of the north PUD buffer from 40 feet wide and 60 feet wide (both) to 15 feet wide (both) not be approved. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 29. Place a note on the master plan sheet 1 of 2 and 2 of 2 6~ indicating that the project is subject to conditions documented ill City of Boynton Beach Resolution No. R95- 65 Page 4 of 9 Conditions of Approval Woolbright Place PUD DEPARTMENTS 30. INCLUDE REJECT Show on ~'iii~O;:I;2-... (Oh8.t,~ the five (5) foot tall landscape berm with ficus hedge (located at the highest point of the berm) that is described in Resolution Number R95-65 as required along the west property line of the PUD with the exception of the church parcel. Also, list on the plan the landscape and berm specificati~ns that are ___ .cl.esc.r!b~~ l!1tb.e re~9Iutlon.; Indlca,te on iIieplantliit the--, ber9I shall be completed by February 7, 1996. Specify on I th,e' plan that tile landscape material will be i~rigated and ( "tomply with landscape material specifications listed in the \ t landscape code. "'/: ',./ Considering that the landscape berm~as not completed ! within three months of the date the ;tgreement was executed (November 7, 1995) as described in Resolution No. R95-65. It is recommended that permit plans for the landscaping and berm be submitted to the Building Division of the Development Department pri9r to scheduling this request for review by the Planning and Development Board on April 23, 1996. The permit plan submitted to the Building Division shall depict the berm and material consistent with Resolution No. R95-65 and the ' other required landscape specifications identified in Chapter 7.5, Article II - Landscape Code of the City's Land Development Regulations. 31. :\ It is further recommended that the water managemen(area i (8.64 acres gross) landscaping be completed and accepted i by the city prior to submittal of a site plan for any further Ii construction in the PUD 1. Acceptance of the landScaping will require permit plans to be reviewed by the city. The permit plans shall be consistent with the landscape drawings submitted for approval of plat 1 of the: peD~~ ory equivalent. The installation and final inspection approval of the material will be considered acceptance of the lalldscaping'"j ".,/". On sheet 1 of 2 amend the south border of the Woolbright Place PUD on the west side of S. W. 8th Street to correctly identify the property line that separates the Woolbright Place PUD from the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD as established by Ordinance 89-18. Ordinance 89-18 is the ordinance that established the PUD. Rectify the Woolbright Place PUD plat documents to correspond with Ordinance 89-18 and rezone to PCD the new configuration of Morton's Way, unless otherwise determined unnecessary by the city attorney. NO j ) c,'5-. v f l,:tbt-/I,.I Page 5 of 9 Conditions of Approval Woolbright Place PUD I DEPARTMENTS 32. .J>hl. ~ Jl BEtte Gh t of 2) indieatiag ~Ilat tile Industrial A~~~;, Road fMuaU)Jl'S ~) sllall be ~o~u'ember 1, 1"7. J'l" . / AMo add the typical cross section drawing of tile /i':hdp;..J.t;. ~. nM'tI, as it is depicted in resolution number R9S-6S, onto the master plan. Add to the drawing the approved configuration of the pavement for the Industrial Access Road including the landscaping and sidewalk referenced in the resolution. If the location of the three (3) curb cuts proposed for the south side of road are not known at this time, place a note on the plan referencing that three curb cuts <""~~~,~rJlll.g.~~.apd w~l!.i!~, i!1.st~~.le~JtJ.~~!Y. ~!~ndards. ,/Omd the text "ProP9Sed S,W. 81: Str,e~t" ,mt.".\, l4replace with Existmg S. W. 8th reet./~,".. 33./ With a disti~gl1tshablt"'sy;bi;(shOlVan(l.taeDlify on sheet 1 / of 2 and 2 of 2 the following required perimeter setbacks: r 25 feet along the north and west property lines; 20 feet along the south and east property lines to include the south and east sides of lots 30 and 31. Also place a note below,., the setback charts found on sheet 2 of 2 indicating that the perimeter setbacks supersede all other setbacks. I INCLUDE I REJECT I \/ /,",' ~~---- . ,,\'!--:~II J ,VI' -I Ie" -/ Page 6 of 9 Conditions of Approval Woolbright Place PUD DEPARTMENTS " ", '0 INCLUDE REJECT " . '. 34. " ~ FRedtlctlon elf' the width f)t tho hf:lffh pt.JP burf~" from 21 f(St.t to 10 feet Is not recommended. However, If the Commission approves the reduction the applicant shall modify the drawing titled, "Woolbright Place PUD Pod 1 Single Family - North Property line 10' Landscape Buffer Plan", prepared May 2, 1996 by Basehart & Cottrell, Inc., to show the 10 foot wide landscape buffer as a 10 foot wide landscape buffer/easement and show the easement exclusive of the required utility easements. Show and Identify on the plan, an 18 inch tall earth berm centered within the ten (10) foot wide landscape buffer easement. Also, change the overall height of the silver buttonwood trees from 8' to 10' to 12' to 14', reduce the spacing from 30 feet centers to 20 foot center to center (trees shall not be placed on a lot line). It Is further recommended thnt multi-stemmed 4' to 6' tnll wax myrtle, mytslne or Florldn privet shrubs be Installed Oil 8 foot centers along the north side of the two foot tall continuous hedge. Place the proposed two foot tall continuous hedge and the 8 foot on center multi-stemmed shrubs on the slope of the eighteen (18) inch tall berm and place them in an undulating fashion. If the Commision does not approve the buffer width reduction, the following sizes, heights, calipers and spacing are recommended to the added to clarify the buffer plan approved by Resolution 92-210: ., \ ! \ . .... Landscape Size Spacing Material at Plantilll! of Plants .J! .... · Live Oak 10-12'ht., 3" caliper, container 50' O.c. ~ r.i \ '? Gumbo Limbo 10-12'ht., 3" caliper, container 50' O.c. i' . .... ~~ r.;~' l' , ~ Slash Pine 10-12'ht., 3" caliper, container '21R O.c. ~, i. ?' i Randia' ~ 36-48"ht., 7 gal. container 5-8' o.c. Myrsine ' - 36-48"ht., 7 gal. container 5-8' O.c. } Florida Privett 36-48"ht., 7 gal. container 5-8' o.c. Necklace . 36-48"ht., 7 gal. container 5-8' O.c. , . "- 36-48"ht., 7 gal. container 5-8' O.c. "' Wax Myrtle "'- -- J Cocoplum 36-48"ht., 7 gal. container 5-8' O.c. Lantana 12-18'lht., 1 gal. container 18-24" o.c. Saw Palmetto 12-18"ht., 1 gal. container 18-24" O.c. For either buffer approved, specify on the plan the type of lawn grass within the landscape buffer/easement and identify the method of installation of the grass. Place a note on the plan that indicates the landscape material will be irrigated with an automatic water supply system. All bedding plants shall be free of grass, weeds, and topdressed with topsoil and Melaleuca mulch. The bedding plants shall be maintained in an informal trimming pattern. '/ I ~! \ The landscape buffer/easement shall be dedicated~e/ \ plat to the H.O.A. for maintenance and Jp:!~/' "~~:~~~~~~~~~.~~~e t~ii~lh~~e~:l{~~~::ed entirely at once prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy of any recreation structure or of a residential unit whichever comes first. )..,:/ ( " if';';.',., H~, i~. ic{ "'f' / ,/../~ .- /" ~ '\l , . ,) ~,iv [.....-,.____1 I .J , ,<,>..~~r,. I' /, IJage 7 of 9 Conditions of Approval Woolbright Place PUD DEPARTMENTS 35. On sheet 1 of 2 show the acreage that will be deducted from the PUD via the reduction in the width of Morton's Way and the reduction in the church parcel because of the Incorrect location of the south lot line of the PUD. Recalculate the site data and L.U.I. data accordingly. 36. On sheet41 of 2 revise site data note B to reflect tHe ......tiv" nf th~ I ",,,~dc~ltlal tfi.tlL., ~~ 1~~~Uf.f lllg which/pod tlh..J a~lv1.:liIt&d 'WIWn. Tv-<> / 71..I.'f.;...~. (ufl-< /i '.,I,~ r,l'i,"')' 37. On sheet 1 of 2 and 2 of 2 add the term easement to the areas identified as landscape buffer. 38. On shee11 of 2 list the total L.U.I floor area for the single- family project and identify the total permitted floor for all proJeds.,.witbin Jh~lJLJD.' 39.//1 On sheet 1 of 2 reference withil!Ahe area,i.f Pod/l that the l .,' / ' "'ma'ster-PJan for the pod IS fo~nd on sh~t 2 of ~. /"\ --...__F__-- _-..-._______ ,___-. 40. On sheet 1 of 2 identify the location of the land identified in the right-of-way licensing agreement referenced in Resolution R95-65. Also identify on the plan the Palm Beach County recording data... ,. 41. It is .;~~min,~d~d th~t the 'm~st~; .;ian drawing sheet 2 of 2- haJ~~ typical lot/unit detail drawings that include dimensioned setbacks for the building, screen enclosures, pools and easements: The detail drawing shall include a typical lot, corner lot, perimeter lot and any other special lots that would require clarity in determining the allowed setbacks. Include within the typical drawing the location of proposed or easements of record. Below the drawings identify the specific lot number that the detail drawing represents. Ensure that the detail drawings represent all lots proposed for the development. 42. Specify on the plan sheet 2 of 2 the location of the five (5) model units that are referenced on the plan or omit them from the plan. If they are going to be shown on the plan ide. at th(UJse",oftluunod~' unit~ i..t~f!lporary. 43.{:on sheet 2 of 2)add to the)project s~mmary notes a note /"j . ,-that identifies each of the proposed r~cr.eatioital~niti~ i by name., (.' '" " . ,V 44. It is recornmendedthatltfe' maximtJr.:; heiglit ~r'l1i~ ~'fiigle- family structures be established at 25 feet. This height is consistent with the height limitation of the homes that are located to the north in the R-IA (Single-Fatl}..ilY Residential) zoning district. Amend the site data on she~'2 of 2 accordingJJ; . ."\.....-, 45.'.", Place a note .0n the lJI~ster plan (sheet t of 2) i~dicating , '-........,' / ,', ',. that utility service to the units will beun~~rground. ....... ...-'~. ,..~ /". /"'-. ".' ~, 46. Place a note on the"master plan (shee 2 of 2) indicating ,. that the setbacks for accessory structures and other building related construction shall comply with the " regulations identified in the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ord,inances. ,_., --. INCLUDE REJECT .' C11- oiL Cl'/-' c.-jGZ' '. I'>,. i )"t--/."'" I 1100; 'I 1?Jt ,nJ,J,;;;:c.. 'cf, k/ 'It,,;! /1)f/ --;.,' )/i,.....;. Deft .A, '", "'1.71'" f Ii .. __, r '4 J2.sr f~J. b ,.~. t....' ,t: /~) ~ Qp...-f Co ,e.. /") //:/01 (/' ~ ' /' &/c (j/t../ Page 8 of 9 Conditions of Approval Woolbright Place PUD '.j DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 47. Omit the text "(interior)" and "building separation" from the minimum building setback chart found on .~ :..-- (fJi sheet 2 of 2. 48. Omit the text "(interior)" from the minimum screen & enclosure setback chart found on sheet 2 of 2. 49. Omit the text "(interior)" from the minimum pool and spa 1':-' setback chart found on sheet 2 of 2. Also identify 15 feet ~{l as the front setback for pools. 50. Within the setback charts Identify the lot numbers that & 1'-' represent corner lots. 51. Omit general note #9 found on sheet 2 of 2 and add the , :; same note to proj ect summary note #7. On she~1'2 of 2 identify the front of all corner lots. ", V -' 52. " . 53. Place a note on sheet 2 of 2 indicating the buffer ,,-.-'''' , specifications for the south and east buffer or described on , . sheet 1 of 1. 54. Amend the project summary note #7 found on sheet 2 of 2 as follows: /\ (""',!) / Minimum lot size: 42' X 100' (4,200 square feet) j.1.nJ ' . Minimum lot frontage 42'''' ... frontage measured at 15 foot front setback line for th~ f(}lIowing irregular shaped lots; 2-6, 18-2' and (:~0-46:) .....-' 55. Amend the project summary note #5 found on sheet 2 of 2 by removing the text "Approximately 4.42 acres." and /,~I--/ replace with the "minimum floor area per unit is 1,784 U square feet and 2,880 square feet is the maximum floor area per unit". 56. Modify project summary note #1 found on sheet 2 of 2 to ~1 {-. correctly identify the total gross area of the project. 57. To properly determine the number of parking spaces that are required to support the recreation facility, the total floor area of the cabana and the total water area of the pool is needed. The total surface area of another amenity {!;JL constructed on improved surface is needed to determine the number of parking spaces that are required to support the amenity. Show on sheet 2 of 2 the total number of parking spaces consistent of the regulations listed in Section 1l.H.16.e. of Chapter 2 - Zoning of the City's Land Development Regulations. Also show the computations used to determine the number of required spaces on the sheet. ~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-192 /\\ft '7 \ A -o- ft (p~ qVO ~i tAyl'1D ~r.- Agenda Memorandum for April 16, 1996 City Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker City Manager FROM: Tambri J. Heyden -;9;;1- Planning and Zoning {)i~ector DATE: April 10, 1996 SURJECT: Woolbright Place PUD - Master Plan Modification File No. 96-002 Please place the above-referenced request on the April 16, 1996 City Commission agenda for Commission action under Development Plans. NATURE OF REOUEST Michael Morton, agent for Howard Scharlin trustee/property owner of the Woolbright Place PUD, is requesting approval to modify the previously approved master plan for the Woolbright Place PUD (see Exhibit "A" - letter of request and proposed master plan). The requested modifications are limited to that portion of the PUD tilat is entitled Pod 1. Pod 1 is a 14.i!i5 acre parcel which is located on the east side of Southwest 8th Street and is approximately 2~ feet north of Woolbright Road (see Exhibit "8" - location map). The changes are as follows: (,-' I. Change the type of units in Pod I from 90 multi-family units to ~ single-family, detached units. The following building and site regulations are proposed for Pod 1: North property line East property line South property line West property line Perimeter setbacks; perimeter setbacks supersede all other previous setbacks: ,-,I() reduction from 60 feet to ~ feet 20 feet }~'feet . ;;. . ,.. ! ;....,',. ,--:- reduction from 40 to 16' feet with the exception of 25:.feef setbaCk forreeFeatio.n..stes 42 feet ..4,200squareIeet 15 feet Minimum lot width Minimum lot area Minimum front yard Minimum front yard (to garage) Minimum rear yard Minimum side yard (interior) Minimum side yard (corner) Minimum living area (FAR) Maximum building height 20 feet 15 feet (i ~.~ 6 feet 2O-feet 1,784 squarei'm 4S.~feet Page 2 Woolbright Place PUD Master Plan Modification Memorandum No. 96-192 File No. 96-002 Screen enclosure (screen roof) setbacks: Front 15 feet \ Rear 8 feet ( , ;,/ !- u loi" Side (interior) 6 feet Side (corner) 20 feet Pool and Spa setbacks: Front none specified Rear ll6IIe'speclftett Rear (corner) 10 feet Side (interior) 8 feet Side (corner) none specified 2. Provide 32 guest parking spaces. 3. Reduce the width of the north buffer from 25 feet to 10 feet and omit the berm and landscape material. No plans have been submitted to show a profile view of the proposed buffer or to identify the specie, size, spacing or quantity of landscape material (see Exhibit "c" - approved planting plan). 4. Omit the 25 foot wide landscape buffer along the west property line. 5. Propose project signage at the entrance on Southwest 8th Street. 6. Propose an optional wall or rail fence along the Southwest 8th Street frontage of the project. 7. Provide private recreation on Pod 1 to serve Pod 1. A twenty-five (25) foot setback is proposed for the structures proposed within the recreation area. 8. Reduction in the width of Morton's Way from 80 feet to 50 feet. ~..'~ j/;;t...'" BACKGROUND The Woolbright Place PUD consists of 81.1163 acres and is approved for a total of 656 units (16 duplex units and 640 multi-family units). The 656 units equal a density of 8.08 dwelling units per acre for the entire PUD. Pod 1 is master plan approved for 90 multi-family units and was split-off as a separate residential parcel within the pun when 548 of the multi-family units within the pun were subdivided for the "The Vinings at Boynton Beach" project. The Vinings was further subdivided into two (2) phases. Phase One (1) was platted on February 21, 1996 and construction is underway. The latest approved master plan for the Woolbright Place PUD is shown in the attached Exhibit "D". Chapter 2.5, Planned Unit Development, of the City's Land Development Regulations states that changes in Planned Unit Developments shall be processed as follows: Section 12. Changes in plans. "Changes in plans approved as part of the zoning to PUD may be permitted by the Planning and Zoning Board upon application filed by the developer or his successors in interest, prior to the expiration of the PUD classification, but only [after] a finding that any such change or changes are in accord with all regulations in effect when the change or changes are requested and the intent and purpose of the comprehensive plan in effect at the time of the proposed change. Page 3 Woolbright Place pun Master Plan Modification Memorandum No. 96-192 File No. 96-002 Substantial changes shall be proposed as for a new application of PUD zoning. The determination of what constitutes a substantial change shall be within the sole discretion of the City Commission. Non-substantial changes as determined by the City Commission on plans shall not extend the expiration of the eighteen (18) month approval for the PUD classification." Also, pursuant to Resolution No. R95-65, which sets forth an expedited review of development applications submitted to the City by the property owner, the special schedule established by staff and the applicant for processing this request is as follows: March 22, 1996 - Application/plans received. March 22, 1996 - Plans distributed to the Technical Review Committee (TRC). Written comments due to the Planning and Zoning Department at the end or the day of April 4, 1996 for preparation of staff report to commission. April 9, 1996 - TRC meeting held. (Note: The expedited process does not require resubmittal by the applicant. Therefore, regardless of the condition of a first submittal, staff must forward the request. The only exception to this would be resubmittal voluntarily by the applicant. The applicant did not choose to resubmit this request to address some of the more major issues raised by staff. ) April 16, 1996 - City Commission meeting. April 23, 1996 - Special Planning and Development Board meeting (a special, earlier Planning and Development Board meeting was desired by the applicant). May 7, 1996 City Commission meeting, if deemed necessary by the city attorney. ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed this request for consistency with the PUD development standards, and the intent and purpose of Planned Unit Developments as stated in the following sections of Chapter 2.5 of the City's Land Development Regulations: Section 1. Intent and purpose "A Planned Unit Development District (PUD) is established. It is intended that this district by utilized to promote efficient and economical land use, improved amenities, appropriate and harmonious variety in physical development, creative design, improved living environment, orderly and economical development in the City and the protection of adjacent and existing and future City development. The district is suitable for development, redevelopment and conservation of land, water and other resources of the City. Regulations for Planned Unit Developments are intended to accomplish the purposes of zoning, subdivision regulations and other applicable City regulations to the same degree that they are intended to control development on a lot-by-Iot Page 4 Woolbright Place PUD Master Plan Modification Memorandum No. 96-192 File No. 96-002 basis. In view of the substantial public advantages of Planned Unit Development, it is the intent of PUD regulations to promote and encourage development in this form where tracts suitable in size, location and character for the uses and structures proposed are to be planned and developed as unified and coordinated units. Section 9. Internal PUD standards B. INTERNAL LOTS AND FRONTAGE. Within the boundaries of the PUD, no minimum lot size or minimum, yards shall be required; provided, however, that PUD frontage on dedicated public roads shall observe front yard requirements in accordance with the zoning district the PUD use most closely resembles and that peripheral yards abutting other zoning districts shall be the same as required in the abutting zone." With respect to the changes requested; 1. The change from 90 multi-family units to 8S single-family units creates a reduction of seven (1) units. The gross density for the 14.~ acres in Pod 1 would reduce from 6.36 to 6A9-units per acre. With the change of type of units there is also a change in trips generated. The proposed change will increase the trips for Pod 1 from 630 total trips generated by the multi-family use [90 (multi- family units) x 7 (trips per unit) = 630 total trips] to 850 total trips generated by the proposed single-family detached units [8j"(single-family) x 10 (trips per unit = 8$0 total trips]. Staff accepts the change in type of units, however, the impact of the increase in the total number of trips generated (630 to 850) has not been analyzed by the applicant, as is required. The increase in trips could be justified by omitting the 16 duplex units (112 trips) within Pod 3 and reducing the proposed 85 single-family units to 74 units (740 trips). Therefore, the 74 single- family detached units (740 trips) would not generate an increase in trips for the PUD due to the total of 630 trips for the multi-family units and the 112 trips for the duplex units. Omitting the duplex units from Pod 3 would require the master plan to reflect the new use and the unit total in Pod 1 to be changed to reflect the reduction in units. To ensure complete development of the PUD located on the east side of Southwest 8th Street the property owner of Pod 3 should be required to submit a site plan showing landscaping in the new open space area. It is recommended that the site plan for this area be processed with the site plan for POD 1. Regarding the proposed building and site regulations and perimeter setbacks, these issues are addressed in detail in Planning and Zoning Department comments included in Exhibit "E" - Conditions of Approval. In general, the only perimeter setback not complying with the zoning code is the setback along Southwest 8th Street. However, the applicant has agreed to change the proposed setback from 20 feet to 25 feet. As previously indicated in this report, the PUD frontage on dedicated public roads shall observe front yard requirements in accordance with the zoning district the PUD use most closely resembles. The adjacent zoning district is R-IA (Single-Family Residential) and is the district the proposed development most closely resembles. The front yard requirement for the R-IA zoning district is 25 feet and considering the lots in the proposed development are double frontage lots they are required to observe front setback requirements along both frontages. Planning and Zoning Department comments include other setback and building height recommendations that staff believes are in the best interest of the adjacent neighborhood and the residents of the development. Page 5 Woolbright Place PUD Master Plan Modification Memorandum No. 96-192 File No. 96-002 2. Regarding the thirty-two (32) guest parking spaces, staff finds this to be acceptable subject to the parking areu being processed as a new site plan. The parking areas shall comply with the landscape code regulations regarding vehicle use area screening and the layout of the parking area shall comply with the back- up space distance, curbing, lighting and pavement striping regulations of the parking lot code. 3. The request to omit the berm and landscape material and reduce the width of the landscape buffer along the north PUD boundary reflects a deviation from the size, configuration and quality of material established as part of an executed stipulated settlement agreement between the City of Boynton Beach and Intervenor Gary Lehnertz, which was resolved by Resolution #92-210. The approved landscape buffer is illustrated in Exhibit "C". Since degree of screening was not the only Issue that revolved around resolution of the buffer design, staff recommends that if the buffer is reduced in width that the quantity and type of material previously approved still be required and that the five (5) foot tall berm be replaced with a two (2) foot tall berm (centered in the new buffer). As a point of information, it continues to be staff's position that buffers are intended to not only provide a visual separation, but a physical space separation. Since this buffer is platted as an easement, reduction of its width would further diminish its purpose, since it can be used to meet the minimum lot area of lots which back up to it. The landscape material shall be located in a landscape easement and the easement dedication would place the responsibility of maintenance of the landscape material and irrigation on to the homeowners' association. It is recommended that this north buffer not be installed on a lot by lot basis but be installed entirely at once prior to a Certificate of Occupancy for the recreation or a unit, whichever comes first. 4. In regards to the omission of the twenty-five (25) foot wide landscape buffer along Southwest 8th Street, staff recommends that a ten (10) foot wide landscape buffer easement and a two (2) foot tall berm (centered in the new landscape buffer easement) be shown on the master plan along the entire Southwest 8th Street frontage of the proposed project and that landscape material be installed in the easement. Staff further recommends that the landscaping either match the landscape scheme of the adjacent PUD property to the south or a landscape plan be submitted that would include landscape material equal to the total count of trees and hedges/shrubs approved for the frontage of the adjacent project. The landscape material would be located in a landscape easement and the easement dedication would place the responsibility of maintenance of the landscape material and irrigation on to the homeowner's association. 5. With regards to the signage at the project entrance, optional wall or rail fence and private recreation area, staff finds them to be acceptable subject to the staff comments listed in the attached Conditions of Approval and approval of a future site plan review request submitted by the developer. 6. The reduction in the width of Morton's Way from eighty (80) feet to fifty (50) feet was recently approved as part of Resolution No. R95-65 - Tradewinds Settlement Document. RECOMMENDATION On Tuesday April 9, 1996, the Technical Review Committee (TRC) met to review the Page 6 Woolbright Place PUD Master Plan Modification Memorandum No. 96-192 File No. 96-002 requested master plan modification. The TRC recommends that the City Commission make a finding of no substantial change. It is further recommended that the Commission forward this request to the Planning and Development Board for consideration of and action on the attached conditions of approval in Exhibit "E". It Is advised to have the Commission also make a recommendation to the Planning and Development Board regarding the attached conditions, especially comment 61 regarding reduction In POD 1 and POD 3 units that is discussed on page 4 of this report, as this comment was generated in response to no traffic analysis being submitted. The Commission would have the option of tabling this request until the traffic analysis is submitted. TJH:meh:dim xc: Central File a:WOOLPLAC.MPM E X H I BIT .. A II / 24' 48 /:f 2;:,' 06 FlU 1 6 : 08 F.H 1 407 , NORTON GRUII!' IgJ002 Rul. ESUTlINYIITMINTI . GINIRAL CONTAAcrou 0011 CI.INT MoolIl: ROAD, SUITI 114 BOCA RUON. FLORIDA 33487 PHON.: 407.884.1188 . FAX: 407-141-0848 March 22, 1996 Via Faalmlle: (407) 37s-6090 Mr. Mike HaiS Current Planning Coordinator Planning & ZoniD8 Department City of Boynton BeBcll. FL RE: Woolbright Plaee P.U.D. Ma.ter PlaD Revlllo.. Dear Mr. Haig: Pursuant to our telephone conversation I will attempt to ou1Jinc the changes being requested in our Master Plan submission. 1) Change in the approved mastcr plan from a remainder unit count of(92) multi-family units as approved, to (8S) single-family lots. approximately 42'..() x 100' minimual size with provisions for screen and pool or spa facilities. This community will have private recreational facilities as per code. 1) The north property line landscape buffer, between Lake Boynton Estates and the P.U.O., to be changed from 2S'..() to 10'-0. This is based upon the change from multi-family' against single-family units to single-family against single- family units. J) The multi-famHy building set back line along the north property line changes from 60'-0 to 25'-0, for single family. . 4) The building set back line along the west property line (S.W.8th St.) is being changed from, 40'-0 multi-family set back. to, 20'~O single-family set back, and along the recreational area, a 25'-0 building set back Jine, S) Final adjustment wfll be made in the building envelope for pool and spa lots. 1 trust that I have covered the important points. Cordially, ~~ Michael Morton cc: Mr. Brett Nefn, eeL Consultants, Inc. Ms Anna Cottrell, Basehart &. Cottrell ';F:..;......1: "~I :,--, t? ,~ ' ! r~ . r!~ I I'Wlf' I . i : I dUll'lil - ~ l. ~, I IHljll ~- "-~, ~ ~ i Hi !~~g~j , H~,) ':rr" ~ ~. W ,~:~c . , " h . i : ;;; ~-. m. I~ I, ~ '; ~ en \. , m.. r ~ L ~"IJ ~\~~-/~. '" ~I H~I~: ~~. ~~' In, ~---<o.~o ~~...:;o:.'-~"~=' i'~_~ .::-.-; " I ~ ' . 1\ : !: ! ' \\.:\ l' i ;, I .,1 I .c' 'e - . I ~.!! i.t ;; 'i'l'f? Iii! ~~! ~j ~ I g~_ I ;~; rl .(fl'l; a 1~~ , ;; 1 'I I~ IIII:! ,r _ I ,~, ,I" 1"~I'll." ~,j ~l* f 'III .i; .ig ,b"I' , J I : -.. . !J'I .~ J ~ ; !; ~. ~ I . 'i " . - "I' 1;'1 . ; 1\; ,I '. "1,1 -. ) I' c5','. ! ~:!I ! " r 'r--'''-~ "':):f i .11 !~ ' r, 1 ,J I r - . -,' :) ~ r" , hi - ~ Ii'. III 1/1: j-' ~"l ~J ~ j I~I L.L.JL i; 'I ~fl: i ~~ .~ -' ~ o:i ~I." ;: . r - ~ -: s.: 1.___,./ ' ~1;~ I.., j r I.~_~ ~ I;,; ,. , - - -. - , (, I, .~ ,I I ~ ~; ~ ~ ~ f" - :/ :~, I . ; i o _ m & I .-". · Ir~~' i [,: T.;ll Q l~ ! I i IL . t ~ P \ I II .. Et ! ~ I ,i ~; ~'~~'.~i H ! B . - ; I ", It, / , : ~~ ~ ' ~~ =zS:....=i:-:: ~-; .~_ o-"""=--~' , . ~-=--l" -=--IA.RRT~N S..WAV---'. -- ':z. ' : ( .w , . -- ~o '~ V. \ "~n '\ ..: .~ . '\ \ y; i '\~'1.~~.d I I i'r i".III,,,,,,qllj"'/"III"'I'II',"I" I I 1 'J i" 11111 i! :1' ;1' : ,. :(. 1110' '.I:':~ 1I,II'.I,'I"llil"'/'II'I,':'I'IIII' l,!!;lll!!IWliil/j1Il!i!J!!,I!i!l!iii!l!i /1'11111/111,1,,1.' 11"111/111'1'1'1 ,'llI:i lll!I:lllh1i,I..:'II:!I,I.jlj': I!' lillH!IlI'II!:i!11!!liFI!li!!I!:I:!; !II ;:II1I'I!I,'ili!!I!lllllh,,'!j!!I,'lilr, II, ..,("111''''.111,1'1,,,,1,'' '1'1 ,I . f Ili'p', "." II, !lll!!!!!!1llll:lii!:I!:!1!li!!!I!iit ;-0 i:D 10 Ig .m ,0 i~ )> ,en '-I 'm 1:0 1-0 :~ Iz I ml: H:I i!iIf !f~J ifiB m~ if!,: · ::f" "1 ....& u..l : 'I if" :r: ! 'i . ,. I f"'~1 ~. r ,: nl. f': I i:.i il.: ~J'i: i~I(: iJii ~lil ~~II . ill ~!I d:",' d ('J; ;, 'f' ~ ~i 5 ,'1 :, ", or: J" '." " . g. 'rl (: ;: -If f~~ g :i:! i :i I", -:. . t,:i -. ~ ! i : i i f ~,' . E " i 'I j I i I ' Illl~a I~ II :.. . I ill'" 11 I I~ II~ I; lI'l~ I ~ . I,:. : H!13. I I h, H;5 I' . -' ;~J \ \ \ ~ H 2. 8: ;; i: H I) J:~ , '" :5 . itJ~ 'Ulll'lllllIIIIII'rl r 'rl','l"" I, II !li~l!iil!!!!1 !Iili 111"111'1"11,'1111 l'I,III"l!I':1 h'l 1"I,llfulll'II,' 111!U:I'j!!II' h'l' ,1,1111,.11.111,1,' ,II '1,III.jl,., I .j'lilll.II,.lljl'l .:!!irM!il!l!! !1!ll \ " , I J ~I{ l , ~f ? ._~-- .~ - .-, L eO"'IILU"" "..' E~-l-~----~~:~!!l _. ..~~~~.~~:-~=::.. '.'~~;:~:';~~'~':~{2;~~~.~~-:;~~~~ig " 1:;.':. ,... 'I:;!li E ! ..;.:1 J, I i Ii;~ 0 a .:. I 0 . . -. . 0 i I;C ! ~ I ~ , '" 5 n Il . I 1151 ~ n : i ! 5 '" 'f .. .. tF I:, I ~ :. i I i .. i I IIi! H n . 1111 ~ c Hi = I II , . . . .. I . . . u .. pi III ~ II J ; " - nn ~ . . EI . : . . e. ~ ~ . . . : :! f : : J= i . .. ' ~ ::~ ! ~ ~ 1Il .. J 2 ~ i ~ '" ~ i '" !jl ~ ~ " o o \ h r II ! ., o. j, " ~. " ;.; !, . . ~ ~ ! ~ woo l I " I C H 1 , t . C [ ".u.al '. g' '1 ,. t.. 'I. ....,..s,.... '1 '.t.... " . ---- __J~ :~ ' .. . S , r. . l . .. \",,<P&..A! ~-_._---_._---- -'_. _ -___.___1fIIJ :'I'Jft! _._'___~_ .. + v. r. r ::J o e :D o :E ;;; ;; t~ r :; Q .., ~ ~ :; n o ;- ::l r :; :D ::: ;:J () .. o :J :;; + 'tw' ;J,. ~! I i ,1"' !l~ 1'1 lj , :, :3 I'i l:a. ;:j Ii! !: ~ Ii Ii I ... 14" I III .. ,'I ~ .. II ~ ~ ; .. ~ ! i ~ ~ I i ~ i I ~ I I I I I I i ! , ~'1J l'fuIIIUII,' "Il:; ':0 ,1~!J~: ="f: 'I ~ 10 I :~f!'!hi!!:, !j I~ I". \. ,1'11'11; f. r; i il':'l ii.1I1 '1/ ~ o 1"I"j'IIIII' i ,^ II" II"" I WI I J~'" .11 h m . !1'llil'!:~1111I O 11'1,. ,1111',. , li':l11I'1I1 I 3: I .1'1!;ill..11 _ I CI!~ :~!lll~! PI '" 'ull!11 ,1111 en · In' .!j'lllll ,1 rrt ~ i1tl!I'!::';! II :0 I lim:lil'li'! " .Ii:m:ll,lh II r hrl"~' ., f' )> Iilf'!.ii!Jit .: z 1~"I,II;I~1 II t , ..II .1 1.1I'@ t' =1 1 ;; I I I I ~ 1 . '. ~.@, I . l< ~ I: ' IW~:~ I. . , ,. ., I " l,'i i i i i ',lljlij i~~ Ii '(11-/11'1 . ~ 'I d II!. , I.. i ", I 11111'111. " I, I 111,1:, . , ~: " t I !! 11 ' I I IIi -I ~.J :-J "'"I ';'. - " 1. .... . " J I ' r::. l. .( l' .1,' " IIJ)/l Q:; ! .... ", . .. " " I I I ',- ."...., '. ..., <,:.., , , , I ' ,~: . . ( '4 /' .. s . ., , ,.-4~' ;:..-, , :;: (. d J . '" ii' _ i r-------..-- -..-..-' :1. ;' 1 ; I~ ~: l..: t_-. w_a'll ... I I .......... .....,~ ~ 1'..... , .... , 'e",' i I..... .......,: ;' I .... -< "tJ n ~ ~ !~ I~ ,- ~ o o ,., ~ !~ '" :u o :IE !~ !,l - ~... I~ f J-u t' . - ~ ~. ~:: . . --'S" i~ ;:.: I b~ ! I ~ .. l.;.!cl ..~ J I I '" tL-____.~~_' _.._..~ I I :! "' ~,il- i iJUUl;Hi~ 'I:i 111:iliIlJ=P5i ~h I, 'I'; il i,- f !:~ Ilh!s s~!' I ~I! i ~I!~!! i J d I · .Ii i i ,I tt~ ~ ;IE. '. i ,i Ii -5 H~ R ~ ~ · ! ~.',. I '1 . h. ~ ~ I ' ~ r~;; it ;: ,. ,. ~. ""- " . .. ~~... ,. / ,l....... ....... ...... J... ... .......; !!H J!B,ii ;i i : US s,. I ~ ig ~ ~ ,~I I' Illi~ ~ i;i I I ~ .. III1 E! : I:~:i H' gii ~ if! : t'l"at U~ HRR A. - : .i 51 Ii i II ,. Ii":;" I -i :.~ f. t~t P!Hi I-fl tii ! __ ! !I' II i IU) R III IS - I Ii I '- .! I ...... !.) .! -. I Y . !! . 1 . 0 ~ - . ~ = I;.. __ ~.._ ~ ;0-';;' ..... '" ....;~~ " ~!l"i = ai!=:I~ = ~=Z;~;;;:: III 9 - --=:~:~!: ~~~ n ~ ~ ~ f ! ,f "'" 0 C l i. t c ,..', D l .a C r P,U.O I_~ I:~;; ~__~'~~~~_s '" 10 'N to.. i:~j to, .. . I .. v " ~ , (J;' P l ... N J"'IIInli!'.."lPl.... _ ~.,. u/!"", m- c ~ L CONSULTANTS .IN~-+---- i __~rt.::~';, ~.::;:::::. '~~._::'~..~;~~l}t.~~~~~~~~~ E X H I BIT .. B II LOCATION MA~ WOOLBRIGHT PLACE P.U.D. POD 1 _I \ I r II.lft :ClUJ r v- .... '--..: '1'1'1~ r-- --1.\ 1/'." r-Jt UL.kf:: m~-~~~/. ~f : 'Vri"'rit~~ ~~~ . - -= i I · ~ . tI~ -. ~ - - I C _. fiT1r : [ . - '.. ~. . ~ HL . : I WI ~. II '. .-' -...-....... - - A; Ill/II' pee _.:. ~"f'l I r ![lllllI~(:l~' RP ~ I rx.~~". NC'~ /70'V 6EA,C~. ...-., r;, ~. _ ~ ~ q,'1 I . r [ ~I' rrrrrrrnr I . _ I ! . ..--., -l~.o~..~L 1"' \ 1~ 1v'..: ~ ~:J.J'II Tn ~ r.:o, 1; ru~Ij","I'''Hrr) I : r- I ~ /.J: ~~ ~"- :nut nn II I' '" 1111 W: ~ .. ! I ; 1/ ! : ::> ;;;J I ~ \I 1,Jt; ~... - I I' - -:- - ~tdJ ',' II"~~ r!lI~l~ ;uJIlI.J~IJTI" ~tR;jf~l ,,8, ~l t.\~~!.!-~~~~~& ~l~B[H~J.I;i: ~ c- ~ ~s -E C "~" · __..~~ e r.:'!!!!!JJJ fO--L1U - -!J,I!\!! I ~ >- 1- j 'TTiD ,1 17 I ',.". - L ,-\ ) (li'll"~ J!IIl!I!D IlIIIIIIIIiIIl*r~ 'I'T~ '.' I ,I 1 : , j I . . ". '- ...:~ ,-, ,.r,"-"f..... "'"'1 U!J1~ I I:: ,.---..., · j t/ llj m. . , I 'i- ' , ' 11:-] UJ . :J '!Jdf W' T r' L.--l i I ::::::: .! ~ 1 '1]T.l j. I T ~ lOt .'. ,: ~ ~ f; j ,=- -+- ~.. ~~!1Ii1l1rJ!m ~~~~~~~ f- ""I Ii -j' ~L: ; " I I l f-. I'-~ I I -.T-. nHl~~ .:.:.:.- 1. ~.' 11 . .' -'..I ""'.?M ,CJII :- 'r .;-' J;: ,-.. /.Ii', j I " W m. ~ -I TR.VU.~k; =I-=: C ~ IfilL':' ,~.;-... .~- ~J f("- l~ :; . ::::::::~ s;:;:;: I:J'':T~ . -tJ~~1 . .' . l.f.-.t--lCn ' . H: t 1:1 ~IPJt'1~11-1 IBI :'.:". ~~~~~~~~~~~~~:~~~~~~~ ~ 'i 1 b[" 1""1~rl ~ r., L:I_ IJ ... Is ..................... Ii [' I -j . '" I 1 A''''' (.-,. r ... . , J 1'S: . :.:.:.:.:;:.:.:.:.:.:. . ~ ~' - ~ ~ ,. .r I' I L ::: . :::::::::::::::::::::: I' ; . r 1;,.. . .............. ...... -. I r " I ..~. - . lr~' 1 r r ':.:':'1,. ........................:.....:. I r.'-...... /" \ \ , · .....b 1 ~. :1:-:':" '. : .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: , ,I.. , I ~I - -: \.- ' :..:::::::.... :. . . '. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 111 -- t" ....... . ,. ~ rl~ "-: \ ~ ,,~ . "~.. '\ ~ ;,~~ ..::::::., ..: :.:::::::::::::: '::: '.:.' :::::::::::::::: ffiUJIj I : ~ { .)\ ~ f"~...., '. ~,.,~ .~ --.." ::~;~~~:H:~:::::::::;:::..'..:.:::",~:.,,, ..:.::::::::::::: . f.;.... .. ~. . . )1" " '.' . ~~. " .';0:-;0;.. ..'E:~ft~lI :::::: 1-. .., ,.//:;/ 'i~~'~~\~~ _') , "!Itit~ ~ ~[EIl]M:I'I[t ~ ..' .; ( .' . ";1T" ",,,, /' :::::::: .::: .' .' .t:;:c:s. .' .::. .::::::::: ,1:: ~ r "'. " : 3 I ('...... I )....~.. ,/. ." .' , 1fT ~ '=::::::::::::::::::::::::: . :':Ae :.:.:::=:::=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:= ,oJ . ~_. 1.1.1. :~~... 'I ......1 11 ... i ~ \ If" ............... II . II ............... t ,..~, ....,.:~,. " /7', ...."\., '\ '. '.' ':::::::::::::::::::::::~:~::::::::::::::::::Z;~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::~::::. ~I ~lllJ~lr~T"~JII, ::.. ) ':/'/' '.: '. -. 16:' .,:~. \\ \ ~\'~'~" \ .::;:;:;:;:;:~:;:;:;:;~l.~;;~ ~. - .,. :':' . .' ~. . . . , . , ~ \\ '. ~. '::::::::::::::::::::::: -', C( I r' ' " I' ! \. "'t' . :::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.~ lal I' ' o '...1, . . ,. ....................... . ,I. r t'. ,4" . R 3 .. " . I \. ":':.:':':':':0:':.:,:, : p U' . '.'\ni'li1njC; ;~...r~:i ~J) \\~(" ", ... \ '" I ~.t'11 : i~ \ II," I~. , Il ~...., J , ... .......- " : 1 ,. .~... .l~. .'Av"(.. , , .. '_.' ... ~ ,;;: ,lnR~C . 1.......- ; . ) -:--L. '" ~ . tl,! '. ;~t.l ~ ,I]J . U-ri~. 11 rT:.' :.l -.~:~~'~~~.\ ..:.- ~ J.. _~---.ll, ~ ~~-: __. ~.-"C:. .-..:.., I - '\. vv. vv I) ~. ""J:U I ~ r:> . 'T, . rn;'~'R;; . j--'~Y:==--[;:--= /'n\ "'y/ . r:lf I' i ".j151f.f~JI 'flllt;~/';v. 'W.'JIJFJ~Wi~~~~ ,,-// C~:O / I f~ C.= _ . ' . ~ . ,11 wI'" 116 .I!)/L. /!f ~L~" , · '-n ',7 , \....~ ~ -l!f: ~ ~ lr ,'<':~ 1 . )L~EC ~~\" i>:'\~ .~y~ { -11ii=j ------1) R Ii 1. J I R~' . fl.jtTIIItn=~ ~<%J. ~'_." ~~, ..1-.-.. 1;:-11 l;o'j':' \ ~}~ . :. \''''- ~, f.. 7 ~---=- ... E: p';J~.1 J ". ~..~.. ,:1 v'." . :r-- -.,' '/... l.UIJ7_D...,n . ..... . ~-<~'~T '~<;~., <0'.. . ') :L. -1.: 1 /_ . v...., ~!f)'"~'" /, \')', /"-, .... .. I r:':;(7'/(l~' . \, ~1;_ U'l ([~: V ~ ~_~ "L: JtJ .,r r . -. <L(- "~~~~J~J1 U~Ef'l~'P:~.$;JjJ,",- - JILl I L: ~:. L U \ \ ','" P. . ' /~ r\.'\ 6:~ Y." .." I .;.1'.' .'~b I I I II ,.r-T~l.. ~' MILESV I "l .;,1.1, , '/~ . ,', \ i :'/ ;1.'.1 r,l ;,1 . ./. ). ~I'O .400. 800 h-'6 V'. " k, ~-"l ..." ,'. / / I (~~. . ~ II PJ.ANNIN6 U~I.-' 'I _..... ~,\".1 I . r 1 f f J' ~j ,I, I : ...;.L..Y /"--':"'. L ir",' LL,I 'go--! ~ I ~,,', z till 0 ~ ii I :I: I " ]J 0 " m ~ r- - z m OJ c " I~:<E " )> JI~ m :0 3' .J I ~ " a- Ii ~ 9 III Z J " .. ~ ~ 11 'l 0 ! r- OJ :0 - ..,.~ G> :I: -4 "'tJ I '" j r- ~ i ~l m ,.... "tJ ! I ~ c: C ! i I' -. ! ~ iii -' "'D iii" :I '., . - E X H I BIT "D" I > 1] 1] :xJ ~ m 0 ~ > CIJ nf :JJ ." ~ Z , . :! . ; ~ ~ ~ ! . , '-- ;~ .;~ . , ; "~ ! ;--1.J ; .1, ',J ;~ !. t I s: f ." r . I ~ , '" . ~ I. .. " ,'I' . I i " :., L ~':i ~; '!:: ~< m~ ~W mi :. . : ~ i_: J. i . ,... - '. ;! . . :;1 ~ :~!i ~ . , r ~! ~~ ~ r h ," ./ !, ~ I ,,; " iil , H :I: ~j : i i l' 1:3' ~: I ,=1. . if Ii;;' i I' 1m I i; H, ~ 'f I If .~" ,J !=l' ; ! ill! f Ii;!i i f ifi ~ i (sf I ils:prr : tfl,.rn r JJ', fa ~1f.~ fF: ~~\. , ~ . , , , ,t .....~,."''-...... ... : ~~:= 4.;; ~ ""I ~ ",,,,lt~~ ...., I: . v ;;; :t ;r ~ .,.....:. ":1 f:';!.!;::,: "I: ". Iw- I: z r- L! ~ E " . '. UI i ~: 0 c . '0 : 0 ! !: . I ~i 0 i > i -.' -I .. I > I H I' . E. s' r 0 . E' .i 0 ~ : .~ ~ 0 . ~. . 0 . . f . :: . : j= . : . ~ i :: :; I ~ .. _..:..1 . ~, .."'11:1 .. ~H ! 1,1. fI ~r J i il j Ul !.: '0. ::j .:~ m .; o. J + 0; S. ... 0 'i iH > ! 0 -I I I .' 0 > ~ ! ! ii ! ! . i i: : . : e il I ~ ~ o . ~::K . . ~ , ~ ; , i :~~~ :hr! f,' .1 ,~; c:.ti! " i:!j I ;!~I ..01 I ~i: ! 11 i ~l '~clli I : '~d I ' (;l i . it; ~ ~ : !i ; [ !i g ~ I ~~'--,",'~~",,--y~~ --~t1 /? . ~~ ' . : ~ t I ~{ \) " ,j; 1""11' I ,mll""ll ;; -I,. I lin:; ~""O\i "Ill" ~ \0 :;\': 0:,'" I \ .# . j' ~ : ! i .:'X;':' ~ .. ~f) ~ i~ ; ~ : i -~ '" ; ;; en ~ i ! ~ co <..:>'. ~ !ii ~ .. ~i !i I ! :; I: I!:i:i iEE;j " ' i'.", ~: 11;:i! J3 ~- ,i;: <'~~~~ "', :r~, :~i: t i ;J ii', , : ;1 .. .. c ". . ,_ __~ . 'f "':.:, :i ~ ~ '::-:--'; ~ ~~_.,~/ tli, ~ - - ---. ~ ~ ~ ~~ , : I -I. iifa ,'Q , Ii "!~ 0 I ti ;Q I \;~ ,~-~~ '" 0 "" ~;,dJ, ',j \ :... -- MORTONS W~y _ -::---- -.. ~.. . . <J G J) ,~' ~i .. ., 0,,11 ~l d l- t" ;! ~ H , l~ ; 1\:; !ii i!l ~ m . ~ :/ : ~ !~ f'il . ; ~ ! ~ \i c '", ''?- '\i. . ':1 \ ~ ;~ \ · i\_~~ ~j ! I L> : ~ ; ! @ r I!' = ~ t.', fil S S >~ ~~ ::r + ~, '" . CO :z to... b b ts ."lIn.... .. - "tt ~o -~'> ~ J .., ,:::--.. ~.... ~~ ::0- "'C. .. n o I I j' ! Hj;' a II if:::; Ii;:! hI ..... ....- 1] ~ '. .. :1 :_ WOOLBRIGHT PLACE P.U.D. fr--.....' 80YHTOH .."eH, '~O.'''A ' _, ! q; " ...ASTER PlAN f--"'--::'~ TRADEWlNOS DESIGN AND CONSmUCnON CORPORATION '''G:.t-~/ I I . ; v. n '" '" r 8 '" o ~ . ~ ;: ~ l!' > so ~ l>'::b ~'"'Cl ::r~ ;f 1 ~.... ; ! ::r ftt ~tib~ "1> r') .. ~ .. -. ~'> f:.l.t" ' ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ":t ~ ~;s ~.. ~ llQ 1r' ~ '(. ~. ~ '" E X H I BIT II E .. EXHIBIT "E" Conditions of Approval Project name: Woolbright Place PUD File number: 96-002 Reference:The submittal consists of a letter signed bv Michael Morton. dated March 22. 1996 and three sheets prepared by CCL Consultants Inc. sheets 1 of 2 and 2 of 2 prepared bv Brett Nein. dated March 20. 1996 and sheet 1 of 1 prepared bv Louis R. Campanile. Jr. dated April 8. 1996 I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I PUBLIC WORKS Comments: NONE UTILITIES NONE I I NONE ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 4. No building structure, screen enclosure, pool, or portion thereof is allowed within setbacks, either now or in the future. Chap.l, Art.II,pg.I-30 5. Project shall have underground facilities to residential units. Chap.2.5, Sec.9E,pg.2.5-7 6. Show the locations of all temporary structures or permanent structures having a temporary use. Provide a statement outlining the temporary use and when they will be removed. Chap.3,Art.IV,Sec.3R,pg.3_5 7. Provide a master stormwater management plan. Chap.3,Art.IV,Sec.3T,pg.3_6 Page 2 of 11 Conditions of Approval Woolbright Place PUD DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 8. Site plan review & approval required. Chap.4,Sec.2,pg.4-1 9. Plat review and approval required. Chap.5,Art.II,Sec.1,pg.5-1 10. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and collector streets. Chap.6,Art.III,Sec.11A,P9.6_3 11. Provide Certification by Developer's Engineer that drainage plan complies with all City codes & standards. Chap.6,Art.IV,Sec.5A,pg.6_7 and Chap.23,Art.IIF,pg.23-8 12. Locate all drainage easements. Chap.6,Art.IV,Sec.6B,pg.6-9 13. Minimum street right-of-way width for a local street with 2 mountable curbs is 50 feet not 40 feet as shown; with swales minimum right-of-way width is 60 feet. Chap.6,Art.IV,Sec.10C,pg.6-11 14. Minimum cul-de-sac ROW diameter is 100' . Chap.6,Art.IV,Sec.10D,pg.6-12 15. Need SFWMD .& LWDD acceptance prior to Engineering approval. Chap.6,Art.VII,Sec.4B,pg.6-24 16. Applicant's attention is directed to Chap.7,pg.7-1 regarding surety requirements. 17. All landscaped areas shall be provided with an automatic water supply system. Chap.7.5,Art.II,Sec.5B,pg.7.5_14 18. Provide stop signs and stop bars in accordance with the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices" . Chap. 23, Art.IIB2,pg.23-7 BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 19. Maximum square footage for entrance wall sign shall be 32 sq. ft. 20. Since the square footage of the lot proposed is closer to an R-2 zoning, the Building Division suggests that maximum lot coverage meet the 40% maximum. 21. As to the question whether or not this is a substantial modification, we will support whatever the other divisions agree upon. Page 3 of 11 Conditions of Approval Woolbright Place PUD DEPARTMENTS PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 22. The developer has already received one-half credit for private recreation. Multi-family unit PODs 2A and 2B already show privatized recreation sufficient to qualify for one-half credit, but restrict the recreation provided to the multi- family unit residents only. In order to qualify for one-half credit for POD I, the developer is obligated to provide a minimum of five basic park requirements suitable for the future residents of this section. 23. The following recreation elements are shown on the plan: 1. Pool 2. Sand volleyball court 3. Family picnic area 4. Playground area 5. Health trail The recreation elements listed above are insufficient to meet the needs of the single-family units. The Recreation Department cannot recommend one-half credit for private recreation provided at this time. The Recreation Department recommends a minimum 1,300 square feet meeting hall be added to the recreation elements in lieu of either the health trail, volleyball court or picnic area in order to strengthen the recreation package sufficiently for the department to recommend one-half credit. The health trail will need to include marked distances so the user will know how far they have travelled. The trail should be asphalt or other hard surface. 24. Based on the number of single-family units, the following additional recreation fees would be applicable if the developer does not qualify for one-half credit: 85 single-family units X .0180 = 1.530 acres. Since the developer has already paid one-half of the recreation fee, he would be responsible for 1.530 divided by 2 = .765 acres. Fee in lieu of land is recommended. INCLUDE REJECT Page 4 of 11 Conditions of Approval Woolbright Place PUD I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I 25. If the final recreation package includes a children's play area and family picnic area, then additional details would have to be provided to insure that recreation equipment would be of commercial quality and of sufficient size to meet the need of the community. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: 26. It is recommended that the reduction of the north PUD landscape buffer width from 25 feet wide to 10 feet wide not be approved. 27. It is recommended that the reduction of the landscape buffer between POD 1 and POD 2B from 20 feet to 10 feet wide not be approved. 28. It is recommended that the reduction of the north PUD buffer from 40 feet wide and 60 feet wide (both) to 15 feet wide (bo t h) not be approved. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 29. Place a note on the master plan sheet 1 of 2 and 2 of 2 indicating that the project is subject to conditions documented in City of Boynton Beach Resolution No. R95-65. Page 5 of 11 Conditions of Approval Woolbright Place PUD DEPARTMENTS 30. Show on the master plan (sheet 1 of 2) the five (5) foot tall landscape berm with ficus hedge (located at the highest point of the berm) that is described in Resolution Number R95-65 as required along the west property line of the PUD with the exception of the church parcel. Also, list on the plan the landscape and berm specifications that are described in the resolution. Indicate on the plan that the berm shall be completed by February 7, 1996. Specify on the plan that the landscape material will be irrigated and comply with landscape material specifications listed in the landscape code. Considering that the landscape berm was not completed within three months of the date the agreement was executed (November 7, 1995) as required by Resolution No. R95-65, it is recommended that permit plans for the landscaping and berm be submitted to the Building Division of the Development Department prior to scheduling" this request for review by the Planning and Development Board on April 23, 1996. The permit plan submitted to the Building Division shall depict the berm and material consistent with Resolution No. R95-65 and the other required landscape specifications identified in Chapter 7.5, Article II - Landscape Code of the City's Land Development Regulations. It is further recommended that the water management tract (8.64 acres gross) landscaping be completed and accepted by the city prior to submittal of a site plan for any further construction in POD 1. Acceptance of the landscaping will require permit plans to be reviewed by the city. The permit plans shall be consistent with the landscape drawings submitted for approval of plat 1 of the PUD or equivalent. The installation and final inspection approval of the material will be considered acceptance of the landscaping. INCLUDE REJECT Page 6 of 11 Conditions of Approval Woolbright Place PUD I DEPARTMENTS 31. On sheet 1 of 2 amend the south border of the Woolbright Place PUD on the west side of S.W. 8th Street to correctly identify the property line that separates the Woolbright Place PUD from the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD as established by Ordinance 89-18. Ordinance 89-18 is the ordinance that established the PUD. Rectify the Woolbright Place PUD plat documents to correspond with Ordinance 89-18 and rezone to PCD the new configuration of Morton's Way, unless otherwise determined unnecessary by the city attorney. 32. Place a note on the master plan (sheet 1 of 2) indicating that the Industrial Access Road (Morton's Way) shall be constructed by November 7, 1997. Also add the typical cross section drawing of the road, as it is depicted in resolution number R95-65, onto the master plan. Add to the drawing the approved configuration of the pavement for the Industrial Access Road including the landscaping and sidewalk referenced-in the resolution. If the location of the three (3) curb cuts proposed for the south side of the road are not known at this time, place a note on the plan referencing that three curb cuts are proposed and will be installed to city standards. Omit the text "Proposed S.W. 8th Street" and replace with Existing S.W. 8th Street. 33. With a distinguishable symbol show and identify on sheet 1 of 2 and 2 of 2 the following required perimeter setbacks: 25 feet along the north and west property lines; 20 feet along the south and east property lines to include the south and east sides of lots 30 and 31. Also place a note below the setback charts found on sheet 2 of 2 indicating that the perimeter setbacks supersede all other setbacks. I INCLUDE I REJECT I Page 7 of 11 Conditions of Approval Woolbright Place PUD DEPARTMENTS 34. Submit for review landscape plans for the 10 foot wide landscape buffer shown along the north property of the proposed project. To create a uniform buffer along the north property line of the PUD, show and identify landscape species, sizes, spacing and quantity of material specifications consistent with the original approved buffer. The plan shall include a section/profile view of the buffer material depicting the location of the landscape material as it relates to the two (2) foot tall berm that is requested to run parallel to the north property line of the subject property. The landscape material shall be located in a landscape easement and the easement dedication shall place the maintenance of the landscape material and irrigation as the responsibility of the H.O.A.. It is recommended also that this buffer be installed entirely at once prior to Certificate of Occupancy of any recreation structure or of a unit, whichever comes first. 35. On sheet 1 of 2 show the acreage that will be deducted from the PUD via the reduction in the width of Morton's Way and the reduction in the church parcel because of the incorrect location of the south lot line of the PUD. Recalculate the site data and L.U.I. data accordingly. 36. On sheet 1 of 2 revise site data note B to reflect the location of the residential units by identifying which pod they are located within. 37. On sheet 1 of 2 and 2 of 2 add the term easement to the areas identified as landscape buffer. 38. On sheet 1 of 2 list the total L.U.I floor area for the single-family project and identify the total permitted floor area for all projects within the PUD. 39. On sheet 1 of 2 reference within the area of Pod 1 that the master plan for the pod is found on sheet 2 of 2. 40. On sheet 1 of 2 identify the location of the land identified in the right- of-way licensing agreement referenced in Resolution R95-65. Also identify on the plan the Palm Beach County recording data. INCLUDE REJECT Page 8 of 11 Conditions of Approval Woolbright Place PUD DEPARTMENTS 41. It is recommended that to the master plan drawing sheet 2 of 2 be added typical lot/unit detail drawings that include dimensioned setbacks for the building, screen enclosures, pools and easements. The detail drawing shall include a typical lot, corner lot, perimeter lot and any other special lots that would require clarity in determining the allowed setbacks. Include within the typical drawing the location of proposed or easements of record. Below the drawings identify the specific lot number that the detail drawing represents. Ensure that the detail drawings represent all lots proposed for the development. 42. Specify on the plan sheet 2 of 2 the location of the five (5) model units that are referenced on the plan or omit them from the plan. If they are going to be shown on the plan identify that the use of the model units is temporary. 43. On sheet 2 of 2 add to the project summary notes a note that identifies each of the proposed recreational amenities by name. 44. It is recommended that the maximum height of the single-family structures be established at 25 feet. This height is consistent with the height limitation of the homes that are located to the north in the R-1A (Single-Family Residential) zoning district. Amend the site data on sheet 2 of 2 accordingly. 45. Place a note on the master plan (sheet 2 of 2) indicating that utility service to the units will be underground. 46. Place a note on the master plan (sheet 2 of 2) indicating that the setbacks for accessory structures and other building related construction shall comply with the regulations identified in the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. 47. Omit the text" (interior)" and "building separation" from the m1nimum building setback chart found on sheet 2 of 2. 48. Omit the text "(interior)" from the minimum screen enclosure setback chart found on sheet 2 of 2. INCLUDE REJECT Page 9 of 11 Conditions of Approval Woolbright Place PUD DEPARTMENTS 49. Omit the text "(interior)" from the minimum pool and spa setback chart found on sheet 2 of 2. Also identify 15 feet as the front setback for pools. 50. Within the setback charts identify the lot numbers that represent corner lots. 51. Omit general note #9 found on sheet 2 of 2 and add the same note to project summary note #7. 52. On sheet 2 of 2 identify the front of all corner lots. 53. Place a note on sheet 2 of 2 indicating the buffer specifications for the south and east buffer as described on sheet 1 of 1. 54. Amend the project summary note #7 found on sheet 2 of 2 as follows: Minimum lot size: 42' X 100' (4,200 square feet) Minimum lot frontage 42'* * frontage measured at 15 foot front setback line for the following irregular shaped lots; 2-6, 18-20 and 40-46. 55. Amend the project summary note #5 found on sheet 2 of 2 by removing the text "Approximately 4.42 acres." and replace with "minimum floor area per unit is 1,784 square feet and 2,880 square feet is the maximum floor area per unit". 56. Modify project summary note #1 found on sheet 2 of 2 to correctly identify the total gross area of the project. 57. To properly determine the number of parking spaces that are required to support the recreation facility, the total floor area of the cabana and the total water area of the pool is needed. The total surface area of another amenity constructed on an improved surface is needed to determine the number of parking spaces that are required to support the amenity. Show on sheet 2 of 2 the total number of parking spaces consistent with the regulations listed in Section 11.H.16.e. of Chapter 2 - Zoning of the City'S Land Development Regulations. Also show the computations used to determine the number of required spaces on the sheet. INCLUDE REJECT Page 10 of 11 Conditions of Approval Woolbright Place PUD DEPARTMENTS 58. It is recommended that a ten (10) foot wide landscape buffer easement be added along the S.W. 8th Street frontage of the project. The buffer shall include a two (2) foot tall berm (centered in the new landscape buffer easement) and the material shall either match the landscape scheme of the adjacent property to the south or a landscape plan shall be submitted to include landscape material equal to the total count of trees and hedges/shrubs as shown for the frontage of the adjacent project. The landscape material shall be located in a landscape easement and the easement dedication shall place the maintenance of the landscape material and irrigation as the responsibility of the H.O.A.. 59. It is recommended that the description of the material for the ten (10) foot wide landscape buffer easement approved for the south and east property lines of the subject project include a maximum spacing specification of two (2) foot on center for the hedges and the hedge material be a native specie and installed from a 3 gallon container. It is further recommended that a ten (10) to twelve (12) foot tall native specie tree be placed on each lot that includes the landscape buffer easement. Two trees would be required for lots 30 and 31 considering the rear and side of the lots abut the easement. The landscape material shall be located in a landscape easement and the easement dedication shall place the maintenance of the landscape material and irrigation as the responsibility of the H.O.A. . 60. Place a note on sheet 2 of 2 indicating that improvements located within the common area, excluding bonded required improvements shall be processed as a new site plan. Also, indicate that landscaping is to be installed and maintained by the H.O.A. and located on single-family platted lots and shall be processed as a new site plan. 61. To show no increase in trips generated by the proposed development, reduce the number of single-family detached units from 85 to 74 and omit the 16 duplex units from Pod 3. Amend the master plan sheet 1 of 2 accordingly. INCLUDE REJECT Page 11 of 11 Conditions of Approval Woolbright Place PUD DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 62. Submission of a rectified master plan showing compliance with the conditions of approval for the project will be required to be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department, in triplicate, prior to platting and/or site plan review for the PUD. ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS 1. To be determined. TJH/dim a:COmDept.Woo/p&d .