REVIEW COMMENTS
- .~~ . .
----
, ~ ^-1PM.
----
. T~ fu ~~~.~.
~ ~ }(JP}.f li'ti'ddz
@ . ..~~.
~,A-:I;~ \ . ~.
..': , . r"'r'- ,,' ,,~-E~
. "., ' , ~tf/l;~~~~'G~
~~- (l . - ~""-.~, ~-.
~ ""---. -"
~!a" ,- <
(!) , .,~ ~~~a-.
(, ~.~~
!~}~,~ ~/~ ~~.
U ~ ~ /7L~A_.-a/~' 'J
~.pw- ;J:~~
p-~br~'~~
6 ~ ~ ~ ~ .9->--- ;:fh-
/It~~ --- ~~&.~~~~'
~~ff-~?C~-
~ ~ e-r-- f-& ~ ~ t4~~-+ ~
~-~~6f-":';'~*' ~.
4~~:I,,~~,---~. . ~..,
~ /. 51,,,0 ?'I.,v
.~~~ J. '-, 1. ffIJO ....J \\"~
_ ~ / __ ~ 'lfP'. t 00 t"'"
~~~~-f- __~~~ _==.~"': - '"
.,~~n~' ,
., /1-..-
.-fi':f; ~ /J.dlv~~ #1, ". ' '. "
1]'1 \,.b ~"-~!~'~_A~P',/~ -~-,,-~'" - ""-" fA[CW,
~, " -,' r# j . fl"l " III , , b..
· \ !(>:..~;r:d4V~~,. I ~~. . w~~ ~.~
.' \, f *:~j~5.~ i~~
,~r~,4/ ,"
, .
~
Ct (p e'O
d . 1
, '
b4-.6'~'
~50 '
5(!)' J qrrD
" I'?/~
'~I e::5 5 S S ' "Dv
, ~ ;/ I
1 0 ~ 0 .
'. ,,,,,,.,_., I,~~
~4 '5 '533'{)O
31 '
. .
: .".,"
" ';1.0 <
"
.-/'
~l yr;ro
---~h~ I. hi
~'1 Do-1 ~.V'
\ "
\ '
...;r: }'. ~.t>'''' 't" 4l~~""
'., i' ,."I~3--1 · ,~"
~. ,,' ~ ,'~1~ '* II' r .
~~..-
. -=-,.- ;'-7._;.,<-r~. ;.
/'1,.,'~ ,.IJ~~,..:r~__.' - ", ,,";/"1&
~y .{:. ~.;.,,;,-, >l\' ..L/
. 2>.'~ v " ~~.~.~~~ .~;: ~ ~/~~O ;i7 If!- . ~ V\l0 · .v
"~~ ..!
,~~~:-' " "
~ .. '.--" ". ' \ "
. .~;;;~'-~.l .
~!' .~~':"'Y"""_r~ ~ J';;;
}i!l"",,':'PT'~ I ,<r~,",./,'f""'~-
'f".-' ~- \.;
/-' f'
'1" f
\ ' .
."
--"-~----
,
..... .
"
~ . ~:.... .
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORM~DUM NO. 93-250
FROM:
~~t Miller, City Manager
~ -aJ'--"'"
Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
TO:
DATE:
September 27, 1993
RE:
Tradewinds
This is a response to your memorandum on Tradewinds asking me to
review the stipulated settlements for items that have not been
completed.
S W 8th st has not been completed with a turnaround and questions
surrounding the industrial access road and railroad crossing have
never been settled.
As far as I know, all other conditions within the settlement
agreement have been met. This review did not include any review
of conditions on plats, site plans or master plans.
I hope this memorandum is of some help to you. If you should
have any questions, please feel free to call me.
CC : f rb
A:93-250
r<ECEIVED
s t:.~ 2 7 1993
CrrvMANAGffiSOFr;,~ .
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 91-196
fO//{)LU //06
(/+1 S
D u4- I'-{;~
FROM:
J. ~cott Mill;], ~~ty Manager
c1U?~~~~~ng Director
Jv6 J~
){
/-1 vf1I '
() c c u I'E
TO:
DATE:
August 14, 1991
SUBJECT: Planning & Zoning Board Meeting - August 13, 1991
Please be advised that the Planning and Zoning Board met on
Tuesday, August 13, 1991, and took the following action:
1. Unanimously elected an Acting Chairman, Nathan Collins, in
the absence of Mr.Rosenstock and Mr. Lehnertz.
2. After conducting a public hearing, unanimously recommended
approval of the request submitted by Horace Williams for the
abandonment of a 20 foot wide alley at l009 North Federal
Highway, subject to proviso. The motion was made by Mrs.
Greenhouse and seconded by Mr. Howard. (PM91-197)
3. After conducting a public hearing, unanimously recommended
denial of the conditional use request submitted by Horace
Williams to establish a used car lot to be known as Williams
Auto Sales at 1009 North Federal Highway. The motion was
made by Mrs. Huckle and seconded by Mrs. Greenhouse.
(PM91-198)
4. After conducting a public hearing, recommended denial of the
request submitted by the City, in connection with the
Boynton Beach Activity Center site plan, of a variance to
Section 5-138 "Scope"(a) of Article X-Parking Lots. The
motion was made by Mrs. Greenhouse and seconded by Mrs.
Huckle. The vote was 4-2 with Mr. Collins and Mr. Hinson
dissenting. The Board unanimously approved the request of
the variance to Section 5-142(h)(7) "Driveway" of Article X,
Parking Lots. The motion was made by Mrs. Huckle and
seconded by Mrs. Greenhouse. (PM91-200)
5. Unanimously recommended approval of the site plan request
submitted by the City for the Boynton Beach Activity Center;
a 6,640 square foot recreation activity center and 89 space
parking lot to replace the existing Tennis Center, subject
to proviso. The motion was made by Mrs. Greenhouse and
seconded by Mr. Howard. (PM91-201)
6. The Board approved in part and denied in part the master
plan modification submitted by Kilday and Associates for the
Shoppes of Woolbright P.C.D. as follows:
a) Denied the request for an additional driveway onto
Woolbright Road (item #l of Planning Department
Memorandum No. 91-165). T~ motion was made by Mrs.
Huckle and seconded by Mrs.)Stevens. The vote was 5-1
with Mr. Collins dissentingi.
b) Unanimously approved the request to change the size,
number of stories and use designation of the outparcel
at the northeast corner of Woolbright Road and S.W. 8th
Street from a 4,300 square foot retail building to a
two story, 6,000 square foot bank (item #3 of Planning
Department Memorandum Mo. 91-165). The motion was made
by Mrs. Huckle and seconded by Mrs. Greenhouse.
Planning Dept. Memorandum 91-196
Page 2
c) Unanimously approved the request to add another
driveway onto S.W. 8th Street from the shopping center
and outparcels and to relocate the approved driveway
southward, subject to eliminating one of the two access
aisle connections between the outparcels and Home Depot
and relocating the remaining access aisle connection to
behind (east) outparcel 2, (items #4 and #5 of Planning
Department No. 91-165). The motion was made by Mr.
Howard and seconded by Mrs. Huckle.
The Board accepted the Planning Department's recommendation
to require the amended plans within 3 weeks of the date of
approval rather than within the time period stated in
condition #1 of Planning Department Memorandum No. 91-183.
The request to change the size and use designation of the
outparcel at the northeast corner of Woolbright Road and
S.W. 8th Street (item #2 of Planning Department Memorandum
No. 91-165) was withdrawn at the applicant's request. In
addition, the applicant is requesting an appeal to the
Planning and Zoning Board's denial of the request for an
additional driveway onto Woolbright Road-(a) above.
(PM91-206)
7. Unanimously made a finding of consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan for the amendment to Chapter 19 to
implement a new site plan review ordinance, subject to
proviso. Motion was made by Mrs. Greenhouse and seconded by
Mr. Howard. In addition, the Board requested that they
receive a copy of the revised ordinance prior to the
September 3, 1991 City Commission meeting. (PM91-202)
8. Deleted the consistency review determination of the proposed
Adrninstrative Procedures Ordinance from the agenda since
this ordinance has not been completed by staff. This item
will be placed on a future Planning and Zoning Board agenda.
9. The Board tabled action with respect to the consistency
review determination of the proposed amendment to Appendix
A-Zoning, Section 11.1 of the Code of Ordinances to allow
for expansion of nonconforming structures, until the
September 10, 1991, Planning and Zoning Board meeting to
allow staff sufficient time to incorporate the changes
recommended by the Board.
10. The Board accepted the Planning Department's recommendation
to postpone the consistency review of the proposed
amendments to Appendix B-Planned Unit Developments of the
Code of Ordinances, Section 6.F - Planned Commercial
Development District and Section 7 - Planned Industrial
Development District of Appendix A-Zoning of the Code of
Ordinances to create time extensions for master plan
approvals, until the September 10, 1991 Planning and Zoning
Board meeting.
11. Deleted the consistency review determination of the proposed
amendment to Appendix A-Zoning to allow towing companies in
the M-1, Light Industrial zoning district from the agenda.
12. Unanimously made a finding of consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan for the amendment to the Zoning Code to
allow wholesale/distribution of prepackaged and prepared
meat and poultry in the C-4, General Commercial, zoning
district, subject to proviso. Motion was made by Mrs.
Greenhouse and seconded by Mr. Howard. (PM91-199)
Planning Dept. Memorandum 91-196
Page 3
13. Unanimously approved the Lawrence Lake PUD 12 month time
extension for exemption from concurrency, subject to posting
surety for the incomplete, required improvements. The
motion was made by Mrs. Stevens and seconded by Mr. Howard.
14. Unanimously recommended that the City Commission initiate a
change to the minimum frontage required by the Code of
Ordinances for service stations with or without major
repairs from 175 feet to 240 feet. The motion was made by
Mrs. Greenhouse and seconded by Mrs. Huckle. (PM91-203)
15. The Board requested a copy of the Planning Department's list
of expired site plan approvals as soon as it is completed by
the Planning Department.
TJH/jm
encls.
cc: Don Jaeger, Building Director
Mike Haag, Site Development
PM91-196.JM
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 91-206
(AGENDA MEMORANDUM)
FROM:
~J' cott Miller, City MapagEY;
fh.v~... ~.~~
C ristoPhe~C~ann1ng Director~
TO:
DATE:
August 14, 1991
SUBJECT:
Shoppes of Woolbright P.C.D. -
Master Plan Modification (driveways and outparcels)
Please place the referenced item on the City Commission agenda
for August 20, 1991 under Development Plans, Nonconsent Agenda.
DESCRIPTION: Request submitted by Kilday and Associates for
approval of an amended master plan to allow relocation and
addition of driveways, and changes in size and use of outparcels.
The project is located at the northeast and northwest corners of
Woolbright Road and S.W. 8th Street.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Board denied that part
of this master plan modification which requests an additional
driveway onto Woolbright Road (item #1 of attached Planning
Department Memorandum No. 91-165).
The applicant is requesting an appeal of the denial by the
Planning and Zoning Board. If the City Commission grants the
additional driveway onto Woolbright Road, it is recommended that
approval be subject to condition #4 of the attached Planning
Department Memorandum No. 91-183 and the attached letter from
Richard Staudinger, dated July 9, 1991.
CC/jm
PM91-206.JM
<r~ tJ
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 9l-l04CC
Supplemental Memorandum
To: Christopher cutro, Director of Planning
From: W. Richard Staudinger, P.E., City Engineer
Re: Technical Review Board Comments
Woolbright Place Master Plan Modification
Supplemental Comments
Pursuant to your review and discussions with me concerning
comments in the referenced memorandum, I concur with the fol-
lowing comments which are numbered to correspond to memo 104CC.
1.
2.
3a.
3b.
4.
Does not apply any longer because Master Plan comments
associated with the Engineering Department comments were
resolved and new submittal was for commercial use not for
a gas station.
Same resolution as No. 1 above.
Comment still applies. No variance procedure is required.
In accordance with Appendix A, Section 6, Item 13 (Page
1924.14) this modification request proceeds from TRB to
Planning & Zoning for a decision and is appealable to the
City Commission by the applicant.
Comment was directed to indicate "the intent of the Code".
However, the exact application procedure outlined in this
section applies directly to P.U.D. plan changes, not
PCDls.
Comment does not apply, because, as you pointed out,
definitions for double frontage lots and corner lots
page 1884 (definitions) of Appendix A (zoning Code)
clearly indicate this situation does not constitute a
double frontage lot.
~
W. Richard Staudinger, P.E.
the
on
RECEIVED
AU6 1
PLANNIl~G DEPT.
July 9, 1991
GEE & JENSON
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Tambri Heyden, s~nner
Richard staudi.ngf~lr;~O
Woolbright ShOPP'~ (Woolbright PCD)
Proposed Driveway
TO:
RE:
Enclosed, is a copy of a letter from Ken Rogers, and my response,
concerning the referenced project. His response addressed the
capacity issue on Woolbright Road and none of the engineering
department comments listed in Memorandum No. 91-104CC of June 19,
1991. Specifically, items 3 and 4 of the referenced memorandum
address lot frontages and the approved circulation plans (inter-
nal access only) for the approved PCD, and the violation of lot
frontage criteria and of the approved circulation pattern by the
proposed master plan modification. The engineering department
memorandum does not specifically comment on the location of the
proposed driveway with respect to the intersection of SW 8th
Street and Woolbright Road.
WRS:kvc
91-025
n
GEE & JENSON
July 9, 1991
Mr. K. S. Rogers
Consulting Engineer, Inc.
1495 Forest Hill Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
Re: Woolbright PCD/Proposed Driveway
Correspondence of July 3, 1991
Dear Mr. Rogers:
with respect to your correspondence as referenced above, the
following name and address should be utilized by you in the
future:
Mr. W. Richard Staudinger, P.E.
Gee & Jenson E-A-P, Inc.
One Harvard Circle
West Palm Beach, FL 33409-1923
This will ensure speedy receipt of your correspondence by this
office.
With regard to your letter of July 3, 1991, I appreciate your
concern about the proposed driveway not affecting the capacity of
Woolbright Road by FDOT's guide lines manual for Planning.
However, capacity concerns were not mentioned in the engineering
department memorandum outlining TRB comments for this submittal
(Engineering Department, Memo 91-104CC, June 19, 1991).
The Planning Department, however, has commented upon both the
location of the driveway with respect to the SW 8th street
intersection and the potential effect of the driveway on the
capacity of Woolbright Road. If the master plan modification is
approved to allow such a driveway, I suggest you may wish to
propose a deceleration and right turn lane into this driveway and
a possible acceleration lane for traffic returning to Woolbright
Road to insure no loss of capacity as a result of the drive.
This statement is not to be construed in any way as a conditional
approval by the engineering department of the driveway with the
lanes suggested.
WRS:kvc
91-025
ve~y ~ours,
V{:l(iftf
W. Richard Stauding
d------
P.E.
One Harvard Circle. West Palm Beach, Florida 33409-1923 ' 407/683-3301 ' FAX 407/686-7446
K.S, ROGERS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC,
1495 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite F
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
(407) 964-7300
(FAX) 969-9717
July 3, 1991
~~(; ll1: ~ \l{IE!l))
J U L 8 1991
Mr. David Staudinger, P.E.
Gee & Jenson
2001 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd.
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
GEE & JENSON
RE: Woolbright Shoppes
Woolbright Road Turnout
Dear Dave:
Following up on the City of Boynton Beach TRB meeting of Tuesday,
June 25, 1991, I am forwarding to you additional information in
support of the proposed turnout planned for Woolbright Road west
of S.W. 8th Street.
Attached please find a copy of Page 15 of "Chapter 14-97, State
Highway System Access Management Classification System and
Standards", FDOT, December, 1990. On Page 15, the minimum drive-
way spacing on the departing side of an intersection is shown as
230 feet, The proposed driveway onto Woolbright Road will meet
or exceed this requirement. It should al so be mentioned that
Woolbright Road is not State maintained, but County maintained,
and that the County's standard is 75 feet from an intersection.
As this driveway location will meet both the County and the FDOT
spacing criteria, it is presented that absent any specific data
to the contrary, this proposed driveway is properly and safely
located.
Also attached, please find pages 1-1 through 1-6 of APPENDIX I
"Guidelines on Determining Input Values for a Planning Level of
Service Analysis", "Florida's Level of Service Standards and
Guidelines Manual for Planning", This document published by FDOT
establishes the roadway capacities for all collector and arterial
roads in the State of Florida. The procedure used by the State
of Florida in determining the through capacity of a road does not
use right turns, driveway locations or frequency as a variable.
Although, theoretically, any driveway which gives an opportunity
for vehicles to either exit or enter a roadway will have an
impact on the capacity of a road, I cannot agree with the posi-
tion that this driveway should be denied because it will reduce
the capacity on Woolbright Road.
Mr, David Staudinger, P,E.
Gee & Jenson
July 3, 1991
Woolbright Shoppes
Page Two
Upon reviewing this letter and the attachments, I will be avail-
able at your convenience to discuss this if you have any further
questions.
Very truly yours,
~~...--=
K,S. ~' P.E.
KSR/jr
Encl.
CC: Mr. Chris Cutro
Mr. David Levy
,
)
}
I
/
4. Comer Clearances for "isolated comers properties"
are as follows:
Corner Clearance at Intersections
With Restrictive Median
Position
Approaching intersection
Approaching intersection
Departing intersection
Departing intersection
Access Allowed
Right In/Out
Right In Only
Right In/Out
Right Out Only
Without Restrictive Median
Position
Approaching intersection
Approaching intersection
Departing intersection
Departing intersection
Access Allowed
Full Access
Right In Only**
Full Access
Right Out Only**
Minimum (Feet)
115
75
230 (125)*
100
Minimum (Feet)
230 (125)*
100
230 (125)*
100
* Access Class 7 and Interim "Special Case" at 35 MPH or less, may use the
measurements in parenthesis,
** Right In/Out, Right In Only, and Right Out Only connections on roads without
restrictive medians shall, by design of the connection, effectively eliminate
unpermitted movements,
(j): Connections and median openings on a controlled access
facility located up to 1/4 mile from an interchange area or up to
the first intersection with an arterial road, whichever distance
is. less, shall be regulated to protect the safety and operational
efficiency of the limited access facility and the interchange
area. The 1/~ mile distance shall be measured from the end of
the taper of the ramp furthest from the interchange,
14-97,003 Access Management
Classification System
and Standards
0" _ .. _ _
_ ~.~. .,".4 _ _ .. - _
.-~_ "',~" _~",",>,..,.._..c,......,. ._
----..---
Page 15
APPENDIX I
)
GUIDLELINES ON DETERMINING INPUT VALUES FOR A
PLANNING LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS
)
---~-_.._,.,_..__._---~.._~~~'~----- -. -"+~-'-----'-"" --"---"'~---~--'~---
APPENDIX I
Form 281.10
MEMORANDUM
Stale of Florida Depanmenl of Transportallon
DATE February 19, 1988
---
TO
District Directors of Planning and Programs '-Qo ~ :..-
Bob Krzeminski, Acting Chief, Bureau of Multi-Modal Syst~s Planning
Pat McCue
FROM
COPIES TO
SUBJECT
Guidelines on Determining Input Values for a Planning level of Service
Analysis
)
On October 27, 1987, George Reed sent the Department's Generalized
Daily level of Service Maximum Volumes and accompanying text to you.
Traffic characteristics vary within Florida and traffic, roadway and
signalization characteristics vary by roads. After discussion with
all District staffs and approximately half of the MPO and RPC staffs,
some requested guidance on how to determine values which may be more
appropriate for a planning level of analysis for a local area or a
spe~ific roadway. The attached text provides that guidance and should
help your staffs in meeting local desires.
These guidelines should not be viewed as providing a total answer
or procedure to modify the tables for any particular local
circumstance. However, these should be viewed as a source of
information as to the sensitivity of the factors used in developing
the Generalized level of Service Tables and as a minimum approach to
be used in data gathering to justify modifying any of the factors.
Other considerations such as peak seasonal traffic variations could
require the collection of additional data beyond that defined in the
guidelines.
The Bureau of Multi-Modal Systems Planning welcomes comments on
these guidelines and will reassess them during 1988.' Please contact
me or Doug Mcleod (SC 278-9745) with your comments or questions.
)
I - 1
( \
GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING INPUT VALUES FOR A PLANNING LEVEL OF
SERVICE ANALYSIS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
In October, 1987, the Department published Generalized Daily Level
of Service Maximum Volumes tables. Table 1 is the summary table for
urbanized areas. Accompanying the tables was a text on the
development and use of the tables. The tables are based on the 1985
Highway Capacity Manual and actual Florida traffic and signalization
data, making the tables applicable throughout Florida. Therefore, the
Department strongly encourages their use. However, it is recognized
that traffic characteristics vary within Florida and that traffic,
roadway and signalization characteristics vary by roads. Therefore.
the tables are not statewide standards which must be adhered to;
rather, they are planning guidelines on the measurement of highway
level of service. Development of regional, district or metropolitan
tables, or unique values for individual roadways may be desired by the
Department or other transportation entities. Development of localized
tables or values should coordinate with the Department's District
Planning staffs.
The following guidance is provided on developing more precise
values for individual areas and roadways. Like the level of service
tables, this guidance does not represent Department standards for
developing localized level of service tables. However, this guidance
does represent an acceptable planning method. The use of other
procedures should be agreed to by the Department (District Director of
Planning and Programs or his/her designatee) before concurrence on
such an alternative methodology can be given. The Department's
"r4anual of Uniform Traffic Studies" should be consulted for more
detailed traffic engineering study activities.
I - 2
2.0 VARIABLES OF AND FIELD DATA COLLECTION FOR
LEVEL OF SERVICE TABLES
The variables used on the Generalized Daily Level of Service
Maximum Volumes tables may be divided into three broad categories:
traffic characteristics. roadway characteristics and signalization
characteristics. Traffic variables include:
(1) K or Design Hour Factor
(2) D or Directional Factor
(3) PHF or Peak Hour Factor
(4) Lefts
)
Roadway variables include:
(1) Arterial Class
(2) Lane Capacity
(3) Left Turn Bays
(4) Terrain (level in Florida)
(S) Free Flow Speed
Signalization variables include:
(1) Arrival Type
(2) Signalized Intersections per Mile
(3) C or Cycle Length
(4) A weighted 9/C. or Effective Green Time
)
1-3
(
\
Each of these variables is defined and discussed in this text.
When developing individual area or roadway level of service
tables, all the variables' inputs should be reviewed. Of the thirteen
variables used in the level of service tables, the most sensitive
variables are the K factor, the 0 factor, the number of signalized
intersections per mile, and the weighted g/e. Any study which
attempts to generate localized level of service tables or values for a
specific roadway should at a minimum analyze those four variables.
None of these four variables should not be altered without an analysis
and as appropriate, alteration of the other variables. This
eliminates the possibility of only selective changes being made that
could show results benefiting a particular interest.
(
Table 2 provides general guidance on the relative sensitivity of
the variables to level of service planning calculations and whether
field data collection is suggested. Guidelines for determining values
are provided in subsequent sections.
1-4
Table 1
Generalized Daily Level Of Service Maximum Volumes
for Florida's Urbanized Areas.
([eeu. Date: October 27. 1987: Va11d for Ue. Tbroup December 1988)
FREEWAYS
(SarbarbaD)
lANES lEVEL OF SERVICE
C D E
4 49,800 59,700 63,000
6 74,600 89,600 94,600
8 99,500 119,400 126,100
10 124,400 149.300 157,600
FREEWAYS
(CBD)
MULTI-LANE MGHWAYS
ness than 1 slgnal1zed Intersection
f:Very 2 m1les)
lANES u::vEL OF SERVICE
C D E
4 42,000 53,300 59,700
6 62,900 79,900 89,600
lANES lEVEL OF SERVICE
C D E
4 54,800 64.200 69,900
6 82,100 96.300 104,800
8 109.500 128,400 139,700
10 136,900 160,500 174,700
PRINCIPAL ARTERIALS
GROUP 1 (0.5 to 2.5 slgnal1zed Inter- I
sections per mlle) I
lANES lEVEL OF SERVICE I
C DEI
2 15,800 17,100 18,400 I
4 32,500 34,900 37.100 I
6 49,300 52,600 55.800 I
GROUP 2 (2.6 to 5.0 signalized inter-
sections per mile)
GROUP 3 (more than 5 signalized inter-
sections per mile)
lANES lEVEL OF SERVICE
C D E
2 8,400 12,900 15.300
4 17.300 27,300 31,700
6 26.300 42,100 48,200
lANES
2
4
6
LEVEL OF SERVICE
C- D E
9,900 14,300
20.000 30,200
30.100 46,400
MINOR ARTERIALS
GROUP 1 (0.5 to 2.5 signalized Inter- I GROUP 2 (2.6 to 5.0 signalized Inter- I GROUP 3 (more than 5 slgnal1zed inter-
sections per mlle) I sections per mile) I secUons per mlle)
I I
lANES lEVEL OF SERVICE I lANES lEVEL OF SERVICE I lANES u::vEL OF SERVICE
C D E C- D E I C- D E
2 13.600 15,000 16.200 I 2 10,700 13.100 2 6,200 12.300
4 28.200 30,600 32,800 I 4 22,800 27.400 I 4 12,700 26.300
8 42.900 46,300 49,300 I 8 34.200 41,900 I 6 19,200 40.600
I I
ONE-WAY FACILITIES TWO-WAY COLLECTORS
) I GROUP 3 (more than 5 signalized (intersection analysis)
GROUP 2 (2.6to 5.0 slgnal1zed inter-
sections per mlle) I Intersections per mile)
I
LANES u:vEL OF SERVICE I lANES lEVEL OF SERVICE lANES lEVEL OF SERVICE
C D E I C D E C D E
2 12.600 15,500 17.000 I 2 5.400 13.000 15,500 2 6,200 9,900 11,100
3 19.400 23,800 25,700 3 8.200 19,500 23,700 4 13,100 20,700 22,800
4 26.300 32,100 34,500 I 4 11.100 26.000 31,900 6 20.200 32.000 34,600
I
ASSUMPTIONS
MUL1l
FREEWAY ..I&:iE. PRINCIPAL AR'T'EmAlS MINOR ARTF:RIALS ONE-WAY COllECTOR
Suburb COO ~1 ~2 C-3 ~1 ~2 C-3 ~2 C-3
K .094 .Of;'! .09 ,09 .09 .09 .09 .09 .09 .11 .11 .09
D .59 .56 .57 .58 .58 .54 .58 .58 .54 1.00 1.00 .58
PHF .92 .92 .92 .92 .92 .92 .92 .92 .92 .92 .92 .92
Lefts NA NA NA .07 ,07 .07 .09 .09 .09 .07 .07 .12
Class NA NA NA I I II I I II I II NA
Ln Cap 1900 1850 1850 1700 1700 1650 1650 1650 1650 1700 1650 1600
LBays NA NA NA Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes
Level Yes Yes Yes NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Speed NA NA 50 45 45 35 40 40 35 45 35 NA
Arrtval NA NA NA 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 3
SI." NA NA <.5 1.5 4 7 1.5 4 7 4 7 NA
C NA NA NA 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120
gjC NA NA NA .50 .50 .50 .45 .45 .45 .55 .55 .35
)
· Values shown are average daily traffic max1mwn volumes (based on peak hour volumes) for levels of service and are
based on the 1985 Highway CapacIty Manual and Florida tr.lffic data. The table does not consUtute a standard, but
can be used (or general planning applications,
.. Cannot be achieved.
... Signalized intersections per mtle.
Source: Bureau oJ Multi-Modal System PIann1ng. Florida Department oCTransportation, 1987.
1-5
(
Table 2
Developing Localized Level of Service Tables
Variables
Sensitivity of
Variance
Suggested
Field Data
Reference
in Text (Page)
Traffi c. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5
K
D
PHF
Lefts
High
High
Medium
Low
yes
yes
yes
no
5
8
10
12
Roadway. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -. . . . . . . .14
Class Low no 14
Ln Cap Low no 15
L Bays High yes 16
Level Low no 17
Speed Medium yes 18
S i 9 na 1 ; z a t 1 0 n. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · 19
Arrival Medium no 19
S.!.* High yes 20
C Low yes 21
gfC High yes 22
(
* Signalized intersections per mile.
.
Source: Bureau of Multi-Modal Systems Planning
Florida Department of Transportation, 1988.
1-6
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO, 91-233
June 17, 1991
TO: Christopher Cutro, planning Director
THRU: Don Jaeger, Building & Zoning Director~
FROM: Michael E. Haag, Zoning & site Development Administrator
RE: TRB Comments - June 13, 1991 Meeting
MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION - SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT, P.C.D.
(Add to the project: Two (2) driveways on 8th street, 2nd
floor and 1700 square feet to south outparcel on the east
side of 8th street, decrease square footage of south
outparcel on the west side of 8th street by 2,750 square
feet and change use of same outparcel to gas station)
Upon review of the above mentioned project, the following list of
comments have been provided as a courtesy with the applicant's
full knowledge that there will be a full review made when the
project is placed on a future Technical Review Board agenda.
1, submit for review the Master plan drawing that was modified
to comply with the staff comments of the May 1, 1990
Technical Review Board meeting,
2. In order to forward the Master Plan Modification to the
Planning and Zoning Board with the proposed use of a gas
station, the use must comply with Appendix A - Zoning
section 11 L. A variance application from the Building
Department must be presented to the Board of Adjustment for
a determination. To obtain a Board of Adjustment variance
application, contact the Plan Review and Permitting Division
of the Building Department,
3, submit for review the Master Plan drawing of the entire
Shoppes of woolbright, P.C.D, site,
RECEIVED
.JUN . :."
PU\;r(!1\hii~\:..~ iDf.,PT.
' ,
-
MINUTES - CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA MAY 2. 1995
No one else wished to speak under Public Audience. Therefore, Mayor Taylor
declared the Public Audience closed.
Shoppes of Woolbright PCD - TABLED
CCl Consultants, Inc.
Howard R. Scharlin, Trustee
Northside of Woolbright Road, east of the L.W.D.D. E-4
Canal
Master Plan Modification: Request to modify the pre-
viously approved master plan to subdivide outbuilding 3
into .895 acres, revise the outbuilding sizes
(outbuilding 1 from 4,300 to 6,920 square feet; out-
building 2 from 5,000 square feet to 5,755 square feet
and outbuilding 3 from two-stories and 6,000 square
feet to one-story and 2,625 square feet), add a drive-
way on the east side of S.W. 8th Street, 400 feet north
of Woolbright Road, relocate the existing driveway on
S.W. 8th Street, 190 feet to 260 feet north of
Woolbright Road and provide a median cut on S.W. 8th
Street for the relocated driveway
City Manager Parker requested that this item remain tabled. She advised that
negotiations are ongoing and an agreement might be reached by May 11th. The
Commission agreed to address this at a special meeting before the May 11th
workshop meeting if a settlement is reached by then.
VIII. DEVELOPMENT PLANS
A.
Project:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Description:
Boynton Commerce Center PID - TABLED
Peter Reed, MIG Management Services of Florida, Inc.
Boynton Commerce Center, Ltd.
Souths ide of Woolbright Road, 100 feet west of 1-95
Use Approval: Request to amend the list of penmitted
uses for the Boynton Commerce Center to allow wholesale
distribution, retail, repair and assembly of lawn main-
tenance equipment
City Manager Parker advised that the applicant has requested that this item be
withdrawn.
B. Project:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Description:
C. Request by Janet Hall to waive application fee for Lighthouse Grille
Restaurant site plan review
Mrs. Hall stated that this is a request to waive a second application fee for
the same stage of the project. She explained that the architect and the
engineer involved in this project left town, which necessitated acquiring
another architect to get the same work done that should have been done in the
first place.
- 17 -
MINUTES - CITY COMMISSION MEETING
-BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
APRIL 18. 1995
Palm Beach Le1surev111e Recreation I
Michael P. Corbett
Palm Beach Leisureville, Inc.
1007 Ocean Drive
Major Site Plan Modification: Request to amend the
previously approved site plan to construct a 1,685
square foot office addition to the recreation
building
Michael Corbett represented Palm Beach Leisureville in the expansion of their
recreational building. He stated that the majority of the people who use this
building are retired walk-in people. No employees are being added to the staff
and no units are being added to the development. He concurred with the staff
comments, but reserved the right to return and request a waiver of the parking
space requirements.
3. Project:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Description:
No one wished to speak in favor of or against this application. Therefore,
Mayor Taylor declared the public hearing closed.
Motion
Mayor Pro Tem Matson moved to amend the previously approved site plan for Palm
Beach Leisureville Recreation I to construct a 1,685 square foot office addition
to the recreation building subject to staff comments. Commissioner Rosen
seconded the motion which carried 5-0.
At this point in the meeting, Mayor Taylor recognized County Commissioner Mary
McCarty and her husband in the audience and welcomed them to Boynton Beach.
B. Non-Consent Agenda - Not unanimously approved by the Planning and
Develollllnt Board
1. Project: Shoppes of WOolbright PCD - TABLED
Agent: CCl Consultants, Inc.
OWner: Howard R. Scharlin, Trustee
location: Norths1de of Woolbright Road, east of the L.W.O.D.
E-4 Canal
Description: Master Plan Modiftcat'on: Request to modify the
previously approved master plan to subdivide out-
building 3 into .895 acres, revise the outbuilding
sizes (outbuilding 1 from 4,300 to 6,920 square
feet; outbuilding 2 from 5,000 square feet to 5,755
square feet and outbuilding 3 from two-stories and
6,000 square feet to one-story and 2,625 square
feet), add a driveway on the east side of S.W. 8th
Street, 400 feet north of Woolbright Road, relocate
the existing driveway on S.W. 8th Street, 190 feet
- 21 -
\
MINUTES - CITY COMMISSIOh MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, flORIDA
APRIL 18, 1995
to 260 feet north of Woolbright Road and provide a
median cut on S.W. 8th Street for the relocated
driveway
City Manager Parker advised that staff recommended keeping this item on the
table since an agreement has not yet been finalized.
Tara Oaks PUD - TABLED
Kieran Kilday
Northeast corner of Knuth Road extended and
Woolbright Road
T1.. Extension: Request for approval of an 18
month retroactive and an indefinite time extension
for zoning/master plan approval and concurrency
exemption/certification
City Manager Parker advised that this item is ready to come off the table.
2. Project:
Agent:
Location:
Description:
Motion
Mayor Pro Tem Matson moved to remove this item from the table. Vice Mayor
Bradley seconded the motion which carried 5-0.
The owner of the subject property, Bill Winchester, his attorney Michael
Schroeder, and Tim Hernandez of Pulte Homes were present.
Mr. Kilday represented Bill Winchester, the owner of the Tara Oaks PUD property.
He stated that the_property is a very large linear piece of property located to
the east of Quail Ridge and to the south of the project originally known as
Stonehaven. The property extends all the way down to Woolbright Road. As part
of the conditions of approval, a culvert crossing has been constructed over the
canal which will allow access to the property from Woolbright Road.
The project as it currently exists was approved after extensive public hearings
in 1990, with final approval occurring in December, 1990. About the time it got
through the approval process, the economic condition of the real estate industry
deteriorated and the owner of the property has been struggling with the prop-
erty. Previous extensions have been approved for this project with very little
activity in the last year or so. The project sat there donmant and no exten-
sions were requested until this past year.
The project was approved with a medium land use density and 192 two-story garden
apartments as well as a church on the south portion of the site.
Mr. Kilday advised that the owner and his attorney diligently tried to move
ahead. Various activities occurred on the site, the most significant of which
was that the right-of-way for Knuth Road along that entire frontage was dedi-
cated to the City and is now the necessary right-of-way to allow for the
construction of Knuth Road. Penmits were issued for the clearing of the right-
- 22 -
,.." ..,'-'I
MINUTES - CITY COMMISSION t TING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
APRIL 4, 1995
The Tabulation Committee recommended awarding this bid to Rosso Paving and
Drainage Inc. of West Palm Beach, Florida. Two bids were received for this
project. The bid from Florida Blacktop was incomplete because they did not bid
on two items in the base bid. Rosso Paving and Drainage of West Palm Beach,
Florida submitted a complete bid. The Engineering consultant, Gee & Jenson, and
the Engineering Department recommended deleting Section 5 (landscape) from the
contract document. Therefore, the total contract amount will be $54,562.00.
City Attorney Cherof read Proposed Resolution No. R95-56 by title only.
Motion
Vice Mayor Bradley moved to approve Proposed Resolution No. R95-56.
Commissioner Jaskiewicz seconded the motion which carried 4-0.
VI. PUBLIC HEARING
None.
VII. PUBLIC AUDIENCE
This item was dispensed with after Item VIII.C.l.
VIII. DEVELOPMENT PlANS
A. Consent Agenda - Unanimously approved by the Planning and Development
Board
None.
B. Non-Consent Agenda - Not unanimously approved by the Planning and
Development Board
Description:
Shoppes of WOolbright POD - TABLED
CCL Consultants, Inc.
Howard R. Scharlin, Trustee
Northside of Woolbright Road, east of the L.W.D.D.
E-4 Canal
Master Plan Modification: Request to modify the
previously approved master plan to subdivide out-
building 3 into .895 acres, revise the outbuilding
sizes (outbuilding 1 from 4,300 to 6,920 square
feet; outbuilding 2 from 5,000 square)
1.
Project:
Agent:
OWner:
Location:
City Manager Parker recommended that this item remain on the table since issues
are outstanding.
- 11 -
VIII. DEVELOPMENT PLANS
B.1
cc: Plan
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORJ
Agenda Memorandum for
April 4, 1995 city Commission Meeting
TO:
Carrie Parker
city Manager
Tambri J. HeYden-~j1:hL
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
DATE:
March 29, 1995
SUBJECT:
Shoppes of Woolbright PCD - MPMD 95-001
Master Plan Modification ~ subdivide Tract C,
redistribute square footage-within the three, Tract C
outbuildings, relocate a driveway on the east side of
S,W. 8th Street and permit a median cut in S,W, 8th
Street for the relocated driveway,
Please reflect the above-referenced request on the April 4, 1995
city commission agenda under Development Plans, Non-consent
agenda as tabled. Staff has no additional information since the
tabling of this item at the last City Commission meeting on March
21, 1995. This item was tabled so that a March 24, 1995
executive session could be held to discuss the proposal of a new
settlement agreement between the city and Tradewinds Development
Corporation which would replace the 1986 and 1989 agreements,
Until.~tbe new ~greement is executed, it is recommended that this
item remain tabled since as indicated within my attached,
previous memoranda (Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No,
95-107 and No. 95-090), there are aspects of this master plan
modification request that are not consistent with the 1986 and
1989 agreements. Again, these aspects are a fast food restaurant
with drive-through window; addition of a third, actually forth if
the northern-most driveway is not deleted as specified in the
1990 Barton-Aschman traffic study, driveway on the east side of
S.W. 8th Street within the PCD and addition of a median cut
within S,W, 8th Street. It should also be noted that in addition
to the conclusions drawn in the referenced 95-090 staff report,
approval of the subject master plan modification should be
conditioned upon reflection on the revised master plan of a note
indicating the one story, 35 foot height limit on buildings
within the PCD. This note is missing from the master plan, yet
specified in the 1989 agreement,
tjh
Attachments
xc: Central File
A:TradMPTa
,.,
~
....
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPAR'n
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-107
Agenda Memorandum for
March 21, 1995 City Commission Meeting
TO:
Carrie Parker
City Manager
FROM:
--- I
Tambr i J. Heyden ')lJ
Planning and Zoning Director
SUBJECT:
March 16, 1995
Shoppes of Woo~bright PCD - MPMD 95-001
Master Plan Modification subdivide Tract C,
redistribute square footage-within the three outbuildings
located on Tract C, relocate a driveway on the east side
of S.W. 8th Street and make a medican cut in S.W. 8th
Street for the relocated driveway.
DATE:
Please place the above-referenced request on the March 21, 1995
City Commission agenda under Development Plans, Non-consent agenda.
DESCRIPTION: This is a request to amend the previously approved
master plan for the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD, located at the
northeast corner of Woolbright Road and the E-4 Canal. The changes
include approval to subdivide Tract C to create outbuilding 3 on a
.895 acre property, revise the outbuilding sizes (outbuilding 1
from.~,300 to 6.920 square feet, outbuilding 2 from 5,000 to 5,755
square-feet and outbuilding 3 from 4,300 to 2,625 square feet), add
a driveway on the east side of S.W. 8th Street, 400 feet north of
Woolbright Road, relocate the exi.sting driveway on the east side of
S.W. 8th Street, from 290 feet to 260 feet north of Woolbright Road
and provide a median cut on S. W. 8th Street for the relocated
driveway.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board, with a 5-1
vote, recommended denial of this request. The basis for the denial
was that the proposed changes were not consistent with the court
ordered stipulation agreements.
TJH/pb
c:ccmtg321.shp
7.B.l
SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT PCD
MASTER PLAN HODIFIeATION
......~
....
..
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-090
*REVISED MARCH 13, 1995
TO: Chairman and Members
Planning and Developemnt Board
THRU: Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Michael E. Haag
Zoning and site Development Administrator
DATE: March 10, 1995
SUBJECT: shoppes of Woolbright PCD - File No. MPMD 95-001
Master plan modification (driveway, median cut and shift
in outparcel sizes and boundaries)
NATURE OF REQUEST
eeL Consultants, Inc., agent for Howard R. Scharlin, trustee of the
property, is requesting approval to modify the previously approved
master plan for the shoppes of woolbright PCD. The 31.99 acre
planned commercial development zoned property, approved for 284,620
square feet of commercial/retail development, is located on the
north side of Woolbright Road and east of the L.W.D.D. E-4 canal,
The proposed changes, described in the attached letter from CCL
Consultants, dated February 14, 1995 (see Exhibit "A") are itemized
below. In addition to the changes stated in the letter of
submittal, a second driveway is requested located on the east side
of s. W. 8th street, approximately 400 feet north of the south
property line of the PCD (see Exhibit liB" - proposed master plan):
.......~
Subdivision of Tract C to make outbuilding 3 a separate
,895 acre outparcel. Tract C is located at the
northeast corner of S.W. 8th street and Woolbright Road
and south of the main entrance into the Home Depot.
1.
*
')
... .
Change in the size of the outbuilding 3 from a one-story,
4,300 square foot building to a one-story, 2,625 square
foot drive-through, fast food restaurant. A conditional
use application, as required by the zoning code, is in
progress for a drive-through, fast food restaurant as the
use of this outbuilding.
3. Change in the building area of outbuilding 2 from 5,000
square feet to 5,755 square feet.
4. Change in the building area of outparcel 1 from 4,300
square feet to 6,920 square feet.
* 5.
Relocation of the existing driveway located on the east
side of S.W. 8th Street, 30 feet south, from 290 feet to
260 from the south property line of the PCD.
6. A9,dition of a driveway ,on the east side of S.W. 8th
street, approximately 400 feet north of the south
property line of the PCD. This driveway was requested
on a previous master plan modification that was tabled by
the City eommissionj therefore it has been added to this
request.
BACKGROUND
The Shoppes of Woolbright pen is part of a November 6, 1986 and
January 24, 1990 stipulated settlement agreement between the City
and Tradewinds Development corporation. The City Commission
ratified the settlement agreement by approving a master plan
modification on May 15, 1990 that depicted the applicable
conditions of the January 24, 1990 stipulation and settlement
agreement (see Exhibit "C" - master plan pursuant to the 1990
stipulated set tlemen t agreement), The agreement vested the proj ect
for traffic, \'1ater and sewer, so that no time extensions for
2
To: planning and Development Board
March 9, 1995
concurrency would ever be required, prior to build-out of the
property, The settlement agreement approved a maximum of 320,000
square feet, to include the uses and layout depicted on Exhibit "CII
- the 1990 settlement master plan, However, the 1990 master plan
reflects only 315,580 square feet.
Since the original settlement agreement, the following master plan
modifications have been submitted for review:
1, October of 1989 request to include the addition of a
building materials s~ore (Home Depot) which included 102,250
square feet of retail and a 19;375 square foot garden center,
The total square footage for the PCD remained unchanged at
315,580 square feet. The City Commiss ion approved this
request on November 21, 1989.
2, May of 1991 - request to include the following:
a. Addition of a new driveway onto Woolbright Road, located
west of S.W. 8th street;
b. Change in use ~nd size of the outparcel at the northwest
corner of woolbright Road and S,W. 8th Street from 4,000
square feet of retail commercial to a 1,250 square foot
gas station (this portion of the request was withdrawn by
the applicant, from the submittal);
~~ Change in size, number of stories and designation of use
of the outparcel at the northeast corner of Woolbright
Road and S.W. 8th Street from a 4,300 square foot retail
building to a two-story, 6,000 square foot bank with
drive-through;
d, Addition of another driveway from S.W. 8th Street to the
shopping center outparcels located on the east side of
S.W. 8th Street;
e. Relocate southward the approved driveway located cn the
east side of S.W. 8th street that leads to the shopping
center outparcels; and
f. Eliminate the north access aisle connection between the
outparcels located on the east side of S.W. 8th street
and the Home Depot site.
The modifications to square footage resulted in a net increase
of 1,700 square feet, thereby increasing the total square
footage for the PCD from 315,580 to 317,280 square feet
(within the limit allowed by the 1990 settlement agreement),
This request was presented to the Planning and Zoning Board
(now known as the Planning and Development Board) on August
13, 1991. The Board recommended approval of the request,
with the exception of the additional driveway on Woolbright
Road, The minutes from the August 20, 1991 and September 19,
1991 City commission meetings state that the request was
tabled at the request of the City Attorney because of a
pending motion in the Tradewinds case and that the Ci ty
Attorney wished to confer with counsel for Tradewinds on the
issue, A review of city records indicate the request was not
removed from the table.
.,
oJ ,
Harcl1 of 1993
- request to include the addition of 8,745
square feet to the garden center at the home Depot. The
garden center increased from 19,375 square feet to 28,120
square feet, Pursuant to the 1990 settlement agreement, the
square footage of the garden center is not included as part of
/l
J-
~
-'
3
To: Planning and Development "Board
March 9, 1995
the retail gross leasable area. The request included
adjusting property lines to accommodate the expansion and the
total square footage of the project remained at 315,580.
On April 20, 1993 the City Commission approved the 8 745
square foot expansion subject to staff comments, and on August
10, 1993 the Planning and Development board approved a waiver
of platting for the adjusted property lines in connection with
the e:<pans ion.
4, March of 1993 - request to include the following:
,
a. Subdivision of Tract B to ~reate a ,957 acre outparcel,
Tract B is that portion of the PCD that is located on the
west side of S,w. 8th street;
b, Change in use and size of the outparcel at the northwest
corner of woolbright Road and S.W. 8th street from 4,000
square feet of retail commercial to a 3,040 square foot
gas station (resurrection of the portion of the 1991
request that was withdrawn by the applicant);
c, Add two new driveways into the proposed service station
outparcel - one on S, W. 8th street and the other on
Woolbright Road;
d,
Allow a canopy over the gasoline pumps to encroach the
setbacks due to a difference in the service station
regulations in effect in 1986 vs. the service station
regulations in effect in 1993; and
"-.-
e, Reduce the building square footage specified on the
master plan for Tract B from 62,000 to 55,040 square
feet.
with this request, the total square footage of the PCD
decreased 6,960 square feet from 315,580 to 308,620, On April
20, 1993 the eity Commission approved the request, subject to
staff comments. As a result of the traffic evaluation of the
proposed service station use, the square footage on Tract B
decreased 24,000 square feet from a total of 55,040 square
feet (52 I 000 commercial/retail plus 3,040 convenience
store/gasoline sales) to 31,040 square feet (28,000
commercial/retail plus 3,040 convenience store/gasoline
sales) , Therefore, the total square footage of the PCD
decreased 24,000 square feet from 308,620 to 284,620 square
feet.
ANALYSIS
Changes in Planned Commercial Development (PCD) master plans are
reviewed consistent with, Section 6.F.13,b, of Appendix A - Zoning
as follows:
b, "Modifications to approved plans which resul t in 3.n
increase of less than ten (10) per cent in measurable
impacts as determined by including any changes in traffic
generated, water consumed or sewage to be collected will
require review and recommendation the planning and zoning
board and final approval by the city commiss ion, The
city commission decisiQn to approve, approve with
modifications or deny, shall be predicated upon a finding
of consistency with the comprehensive plan and a finding
that any such increase will not result in a negative
imp~ct on infrastructure delivery systems or the
surrounding area in general. It is the intent of this
......,
...:.)
4
To: Planning and Development Board
March 9, 1995
section that all additional impacts be mitigated. ,."
Based on the documentation provided, the changes to the three
outparcels would generate in excess of a ten (10) per cent increase
in water consumed and sewage collected, if the approved outparcels
are evaluated against the proposed outparcels. An increase of only
2,8% in water consumed and sewage collected results if the proposed
outparcels are evaluated against the entire peD water and sewer
impacts, In either scenario, the utility Department does not have
an objection to the analysis provided and has not indicated that
the increase will have a negative impact on the infrastruture
delivery systems. A slight increase in pervious area will result
in a minimal, positive impact on th~ PCD drainage.
with respect to traffic, the traffic information submitted
indicates that the traffic generated by the three outparcels will
generate less than a ten (10) percent change. This information
has been forwarded to Palm Beach County. The results of the review
by the County have not been received at the time of this report,
The following is an evaluation of each of the proposed changes
listed on page one of this ~eport:
1. Subdivision of Tract C to make outbuilding 3 a separate
outparcel and the redistribution of square footage among the
outparcels As indicated in the stipulation settlement
agreement, this is acceptable. Platting or a waiver of
'~-platting. (at the determination of the City Engineer) to
subdivide this parcel is required. As required, outparcels
shall be self-sufficient with respect to lot size, setbacks,
parking and other PCD zoning district requirements.
2. Relocation of the existing driveway on the east side of S.W.
8th street, south of the main entrance into the shopping
center (Home Depot) - One entrance, in addition to the main
entrance, was allowed pursuant to the 1990 settlement
agreement. This eXisting driveway is the additional driveway
referenced in the agreement. The proposed location of this
additional driveway is closer to the original position
(centrally located) identified in the Barton-Aschman traffic
report, upon which the traffic conditions of the 1990
settlement agreement were based.
3, Addition of a second driveway on the east side of S.W, 8th
street, between Woolbright Road and the main entrance to the
shopping center (Home Depot) - As mentioned in previous item
=2, the number of driveways is specifically limited in the
1990 settlement agreement. The addition of a second driveway
is inconsistent with the 1990 settlement agreement, Since the
Barton-Aschman report does not require an additional driveway
to be added, it could be argued that this driveway is not
needed and that safety and level of service are not impaired
without it,
Furthermore, this type of access des ign is contrary to the
intent and purpose of a PCD, which is to provide for a planned
(not piece-meal) , programmed series of development operations I
designed as a whole through integration of principle buildings
and ou~buildings that are linked via common use of access and
infrastructure and similar architecture and other aesthetic
elements, specifically with respect to access, this
additional driveway defeats the purpose of requiring internal
~ccess roads and driveways to serve parcels within a planned
develcpment.
It should also be noted that the Barton-Aschman report stated
4
...,
-
5
To: Planning and Development Board
March 9, 1995
that the driveway on the east side of S,W, 8th street located
nc.rth of the eXisting main entrance driveway was to be
de:eted. The proposed master plan still reflects this
driveway as being approved.
4, Median cut in S,W. eth street If approved, this new
intersection would capture much of the traffic anticipated and
designed to be received by the main driveway that is located
at the entrance to Home Depot. The main driveway is centrally
located for the major portion of the retail uses located on
the east side of S.W. 8th street. Since the Barton-Aschman
report did not recommend a median cut, it could be argued that
the proposed median cut is no~ consistent with the traffic
report referenced in the 1990 settlement agreement and
therefore not needed or possibly affecting level of service.
Therefore, if the median cut is approved, it is recommended
that a new analysis of the turning movements be submitted to
determine the impact the median cut will have on S, W. 8th
street and Woolbright Road.
Also, the proposed median cut would cause the east driveway
into the site to become a major driveway which requires a one
hundred (100) foot throat; the distance from the property line
to a parking space or an access aisle. This would
significantly impact the parking design of outbuilding 3,
CONCLUSION
This tiquest was reviewed by the Technical Review Committee (TRC)
on February 28, 1995 and the committee raised no objections at the
time, However; -the committee did not have technical data regarding
the impact the median cut and additional driveway would have on the
surrounding roadways or the project itself. If this driveway and
median cut are approved by the Commission, the Police Department
recommends that north and south deceleration lanes be required at
the cut to avoid congestion from motorists slowing down to make
turns at this location ( see Exhibit "D" Police Department
Memorandum No. 95-0121) . It is also recommended that if any
changes are approved by the Commission that are not reflected, or
are contrary to, the proposed master plan, that three copies of a
revised master plan be submi tted to the Planning and Zoning
Department, prior to submittal of any future PCD requests. The
Planning and Zoning Department is not making a specific
recommendation on this request since components of the request are
inconsistent with the latest settlement agreement. Deviation from
this agreement are viewed as policy decisions of the Commission,
tjh
Attachments
Xc: Central File
A:WoolPCD
"
-
~
~...~...,....
E X H I BIT A
, '
r
()
'-'"
CC~ONSULTANTSt INC.
Con.ultlng Englnee,. m
Surveyo,.
Planner. '
2200 PARK CENTRAL BLVD" N, SUITE 100, POMPANO BEACH, FL 33064, (305) 974-2200 · FAX (305) 973-2688
February 14, 1995
Hand Delivery
Ms. Tambri Heyden
Planning Director
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
ReI SHOPPBS OF WOOLBRIGHT PCD
Boynton Beach, Florida
CCL Project No. 3101
Dear Ms. Heyden:
Enclosed herewith please find the following:
1. Twelve (12) signed and sealed prints of the revised master
plan for the above-referenced project.
2 . A chec)t made payable to the ci ty of Boynton Beach in the
amount of $500.00.
~...~
3. Letter of Authorization form owner for CCL Consultants, Inc.
to act as_agent for this matter.
Please be advised that we are herein SUbmitting for master plan
amendment for the above-referenced project. We are proposing to
amend the existing master plan as follows:
A. outparcel 1 will be revised from 4300 SF to 6920 SF.
B. outparcel 2 will be revised from 5000 SF to 5755 SF.
C. outparcel 3 will be revised from a 2-story 6000 SF bank to a
1-story 2625 SF Taco Bell Fast Food Restaurant with a drive-
thru lane.
D. The locations of the driveways for these outparcels onto S.W.
8th Street will be revised from what is presently shown on the
existing master plan. In addition, we are proposing a median
cut in the S.W. 8th Street median which aligns with one of the
proposed relocated driveways as well as prior-approved
driveway location on the wes~ side of S.W. 8th street.
I --.
I
--
Ms. Tambri aeydeD
eCL project No. 3101
February 14, 1995
Paqe two
We respectfully request that this proposed master plan amendment be
placed on the next Technical Review eommittee agenda and thusly on
the next available planning & Development Board a8 well as City
commission Agenda.
Should you have any questions or need any additional information,
'"', please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
panile, Jr., P.E., P.L.S.
ject Manager
LRC/kag
Enclosure
cc: Mike Morton, Tradewinds Group
Eduardo Carcache, P.E., ,CKE Group, Inc.
'.~-<..-
00
CCl CONSULTANTS, INC.
,7
.."
'WIll
-~~
E1{\l1.1\1.'t 1\
';r
_....n
5~!~
i:!~
~~.6
;i....
~. ~.
~lIIi
Q....
1I....
;!al
w'"
w....
::I!
y.",
w"~
~!;g
"..
!O
..
..
(II
n
ClI
iii
.. o:il < ~ COSO L,.--/ C~~
: i. m < :;:a:t .Ar ,A
Of .. i r- ' ___m ' '" t;... <
~ I 0; ~ I : --.r. ~;i' .,. ~.~.;...,. ,;
~"liI !: ~ _ .:. I \,., .~ ~
!11=;:0 ~ ~ ;m m~....1 -:~:'~j~;
w ~ =- ........ ~. .. / .
:5 m \~..:.. ~~~F'.. _,,~ / I
";8 ~ I .\. -'lli;4;~ "n I / ,--- .~
.:0 3: .' (, ~h - r :0 , / .'
a -: i \ . - - g. ' ~
: \ '\ "I : ~.:Jl!.'!..-n~ -------..~ed! - / :
.. I . ---.. -- ...,-...;f-; .
~;"I' ~,jri~IDP".~r.~- '-"_lr~"[7 I"
\ g!. w;.~ - - J..-- / ~ ' , ·
\ = , t - ' ti---';' __ /' -~;: i'f 1'1 /1 j'/ II '
_..... I '1" IQ -u= ' F. I /' /1
:: .. g ; ,1 - L, ~, ,..' If I 'I
~ ~ .. .. I"" \ '. /' -".. ' ifl[ , ( ,~o' 1 ': I ; .- I ,
........ - , . . .. k:~ s = <=':'1 . =
...g... ... ..~ Q: ,I ..J' -.
;Cln 1: ;".. . ., ~ --::--~'l'-":"""'--' '~
:=U ' , /~,-- '.. ~ .,
~..~---
:..ii
.......
i~~ -
.. ..
: ~
w z
: :
.. i
~
..-0
;"'I~
~ .
& ..
..
.~~
"!;Q
.~.. !l
...e"
~~
I....
il=
..~
..
I
:II
..
..
..
~;I
I~l
~~I
s'"
:il
i
~
i
-.;1
::1.
....~
i~l
III....
."J
..E!
~~.
. ..
.......
il!
: ..~
=8~
:~z
.. .. j!:
5n
:~
=;
08
~il
g jl ~
~l!l
l!m
"
i::
~
-
-
lia
!II
;~
;ll ~'
"JI!~
in
i~
..
!
, ..t"" A
~
, .~Of~9~-?
~~~ir~/
~~~---;:;
"01" ,4oc." ~ ::::::::--- - '-~ ---- -------: II: 0
" .." --- - 'r~ --,!41 ~.-: \l r-_ ~~_ ~ff I): ,.r-.. ~f
\','\ h. -. - I . --;c~ - :~ ,~ .. -) - ...!I '
~ ,\ \ ~-; \{~~r! 77. :-ll~r~jl3f~: t ~y~~= : 7,~< ,,'~n'-.' 1 I
'~' .. , ..... __ _ =+' d. . .1 I ".0
I' '- .. - - - ..,.. ", I ' /--~ -..!U' '10",1
I ,,-......... -i :- - ..' '" - - /' iO Iii
1 - - . ~ ... - I ....:.---:-_/ ....' --
, r ,\1 \ 11\ l--~--: a:. ~' . -Lj D V.;r .-_d , ~g
i [, n' I" If it" ~~ ~c ,;.; ~\ ji-l'l J ,'\~=-A~ '-'-. . .
['I! __ ., i ~ ,\ i\') II i ~I "\. - I;: / : I. · '1 ~-; 2
r, I J ,. . ~. ~ \ :::' ~ = r.r ~b- \_ - - ~ I it --.- - ! .J ~ ~
'I.:" 1 .:!I,I" i \,.., If If II II~___1f U ,~/,---r /. - f' .1 ( ,.-
l f" I ,\. ,- \ -- - i/?-~~- ! ~i' ('~ l'i
. -,1"',1 r" "'1' \ " \ "c;",ill ~i< ~ IIII . r ~
I ::!iI I' "?\ - .- ==\ - = l.f / , , .., ,-:\.\ ~ I ~I :0 j ~
1 ~ r -.-- -.s_."".....,,_....MI.I!:-' I I ~ ',1,11, \I~\ I, 51 \. a j
';,! .~, .',!,. - - -- - - .. -- I I;J' (. t-- '\ ~ '\ I,d ' ~f" ~~ I
p .. ~ I i:" : -" I' \, ' , ,I ~
; I I I II ~'I:'; 11 "- I 1.,..0. I
!; ) 1.1, I., r---"'\
I' ;~. Ii " l ~Ij~ ' lJ,
'L ,,/I:,..'.i:'I\':..,. . ~ :;.. ,! -- -~. i;IJ~~ (II ill ~::-' J ; ii
I: ,;, .:~.t- -- ' ,_::V I ", .' I" i:
!:, I t ,,=-d ~ .. ~ -'-':i ',_, "--' '.___~!jIJ P
" ' ' i=t'L' ...~~~- -i- ~1~.jJ~- .-J--== L ~ I
, . I -~ ~i I - - .......:- ~ .. - I
t - - - - - - - -- "". u.; um,.-H - - - - - ~. -- -- - - - - n~~ - - ~ ..,7"_. ,ro" oS j
III I' = I · :.
s ~ ii.h S.C,L,. RAILROAD :-
I I ~ ".....o~u .
. HI, i-."
~ ~ ~. .1
: . I n ;:5
oil
'!l 2
i ~
j! ~ r-
~ u: ~
~ - e5
~:ifi :!i
.z
.. -4 ;!l
~~ ~
z m
: :a
it ~
..
..
..
.--
Iff
HI
Iyg
.i(
In
. In
~~m
Hi
IW
"il!j.";I
!"Cill'"I..
:;~:;~Ii
~i:~~~i'"
as.;:!!1
..i5;::~""
jZfII ......
~~~E..~~.
........&1
,.IDz"
z!;l!!:..S12;
.,...,,1 I
~;!i~~.
c,&It 1110"'",
.,.....n ....OJ.
a~i~~"'1
m-tRaml...
a~::!~". '
2~io;~J
:"I"'=llj
;;2.i;~it
z,..::,n.ila
n"'$!....
!:....ozooC
"ZO."ii!;
!lz.._;lli
65.:;;"'=
z .._
Wt=al::t!!
~. ztrlF
~~ i~
.. z
.~iZ
. 0
, I~
it m
m
." t
III
&.1
! ,
it..
,I
l~
I:
I iI
.-
..
, .
-:
Ii
i I
[ .
i
"I.a-r-
it.. J ~
; II ~
a IF!! ~
;1 .. CD
: ~ .. -.. -.. m:D
101......
. ~ .... w .... ~
:,: t : : ~
:1; . III , ~
III .
.. ..
~'I~ 411 ~ .
. :t .. w -
~I~ r;~ ~
-1= :: ... ;
'1 ~ ~ ;: ::
Iii ! I :iI i i i ~
.. . ~ .. :01 ~ /: ~ ~
i i i B I ii .. ;: Ii ~
i" I : i i ;1- ~ i i ~
_"1- 0.......
.. .. ....! '.
..
! I
~ a
/:
i
..
..
F
;:~.~i ~e::
=~i;; ,#~:
· r; ~
.. .. ~~
. ..
illl' .,Jr~IB.I'fI'Hlr'"." rr'll n; I
. ,I: .i! ';IJ:j .:.",/ I r11
. J.' II' .. .1..1"1. '1' I,
I, II I;:~:I%!~.,;;~I! ~i: I,
I' ;1 ;:dI1J~,~ ~,.I!I~1:II';r .11,11,1
'1.;II",:!i:ltl~ '1 ~ 'I~ \,
I :: !1.;IIIIJJ~~:;~r.;i~ II;. ,I
h I '1:1~ll'I"I" 'U: ~I'I "
I' 1:~I:I:"'! 1I,!ll!illl .:1 I
I .. .l! I,. .!t ..
II! nl:tiili:I!~'lliit !ilt Ii
III !::I'lIll!ii ,ri:h:'1 ll~ II
~I. h. ...lIh.,..C :.I.. IS
In :'111"'1"" ~, 'I'llrl'lw ~i
Ii ", ,I' .,.. 'il" 'I' I(
l . ;',;lhl;:111 lil~' ~I. I,
/1';'\'1'11' .",,!t." II
,\'1.11' 10111,11 ,I
! I :jj;h, ;i;lli'll,:,hl:j Iii' r
I i HII!'ll:!f;I!l1Ii I~JI.m.:~ ,I
~ i l\:!llli'!I!!ii!!, illi::!~I~, jlllr'
. 1';iitli!u.I:i~:, 'r:r.I~r.:1 !.
I I hi'll!I.JI !l;HII",1 ~Iil' iI
,.-I,"I'I'II'lmP'II::'lJlj.:.,II'
I :1;,'l!U!.;111 1)1!1'1iI' riii'i; ,
h .JI."I., .".. : .C. ,I
1Ilr-
~o
..0
...~
.-
.'
CD
~
Selle 1 . .a
0.11 'U 2&1 .a
Or"," It' t1i&Jl
F... No nos' I" .121 ,
"'_.... 1S-3.
5_'~oI
~i:
Ill>
:D"
!
.
w
m
V"J
~4
~~
.::;;' I ~ 1 J 1 c;o; SHOPPES OF WOOLBR,~~T
~ pee 1'$",_-
. . . . ; . r .
"'. , _ BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA ,., "-,;":'/
, .,,~. ,=~ ,.,. MASTIR"-AN.. ~ .
_/ .....0:
-.r~~/'
Kilday b A..oe,a,..
lllndSCi1pe Archllccls/Phlltn~rs
1551 Foru", Pllee
Su,te l00A
West p.lm ane," , Florodl 3340'
(30516895522
PROPOSED
i()
I
....;
,"""
....,..~
E,X\l1.B1.'t C
II
.'Ii"
, :!l:!l~,
...,., ~-... It
hi:
:_1=
=:;11
J5!j
~a:
j'~ I
o;s
....
.;1
.
I
..
:a
;!I!:~
~~~~
=:s;
't!:=6
!~:;
~i"'
i...~
~a;
..:.:.
~llj
'l'!..
~.;!l
..oJ
-..
Si
..
..
a
.
. "
en
n
QI
is'
-;
I
CII
q
Selle 1 . aD
0'1' ]} 211/ ga
Or.Jw" B... DAP
l="Il! /'.lo 4211
Or~w'''Q No 85-34
S heel ----1......- :; I
"A
. -----
.-;a
::1.
....
~ li'
e;!
..;1
";OS
~i, .
, ,.
'".."
i!:
o '
..-~
..8'
i;i
-...
Si"
..n
:~
1=
,.
;
~
~
n
III
III
III
I~
."
-..
~.
;0
'a~
;1
III
~: i
.
.j
L(,.
-q
~ ~
1-
.J
;~
- ~ ~
i:
;
1
I
~
~
:
II!I~
1115
S .! M
~ 'as
ijlllE
I ,,-... II i
II -' \
If :a.... .
j5S!:::
-~ ~ ~ ~ ,~
!!Ili 1lr:~~1~~m~ ~J~ ~I
II t11"~~!i~,..,,~1 jl! II
I ;' ;lilm~~III$I~~ !I~ II
,I i:!Ii'i'~~~1.;! ;!:t J'
It': jl~!Ir, iI!~"'i~ tr~ H
I .I~.I: ,.", 3i"
J' !i:!J!'III~~if :If'
I I! l'I~~II!I!!I!'i~ l;B ~
· I, 'l'I'qllll~ji'~"~1 ~:I b
I' ;~ hi ~!l,;ti::I, :Iii II
! p. !~rj~~:J!~!i I~ i
i !i ,l;:',~,r,:mi;;' ~rd!~!,~ 'I
.. "III 'I' ",If II J
! ' 'II ;,~." "1 I.!\. . ~
I i i!ill~II~Il: Irill~dl'll~ II
I . i'~ili'IIIIJl:iII'Cli:JI'II~1i "
'. I 1::I~1 U'I"I!t'ild'I':;'I~""r.II'
, I" . , ~&: I' ~.f ~+lrJ' .
1- '11'-1""'" I
'I' !'h II' 'j.:ffi'; 1;:!111r .
:I" . 1i~lhn" I. .~.. I'
'"lib, ;~_ 2JI,~I~ 9H!b.ih .i
.... ..
:: ,:1 iI :I
1111 il ! ! ~ ~
h!Phh~
iI
E
I.
~~~! ==~!
"'l ... ; io l" ::
9..~. ;~:I
! 5 '!II ~
. .
.:::;' I": I oJ' I':: SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT
- ~~. 'peD
_ ,~ '. BOYNOTbN BE~H, F70RIDA /'/--
~ - MASTER PLAN' \
Kilday & Auociatlls
Land.cape IIrch'ICC15/Planner5
1551 Forum Place
Suile 10011
We.1 Palm Beach, Flonda 33401
'(30516895522
."
'WI
^--
E)tU1.B1.'t D
/3
L.V\.IJ-\IIUI" MAt-'
SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT P.C.[
, ,I I I I ' J I I; L J I t '....../ /. - - J " - - - I L.-.........l
IR3':"~ lG~-:1i~':tJtLi.;r I"'; "",;' ,J,;,:~~~~.~~..~ - '~fI~ h l~:~l .
\,"'-L ';1-- ".. \ ~v ",,- III =' ~ I
T 1 1 "':\,. '- :1 _Ll..J\'""",:' ~ i (.J, : (
_ r I ,'Jlji! lllV';<" ~tA - :
7: . ""'-'\....ol! ~ - I
'D I 1 / ; '~I I I ~ "l\ eLl - ;
H _: ' ~ ~~~ l
HLL ~ -: Ir ' ~.A '........ I III
TT \ ,,; II :~~ ~ - ...
.. pee I ~ ~ r{~/ . II _1111., ~
~,,~ rON ~~AC':f.r-"'.;~ 1'. ,
,.-.: ~~~-::;;~: ~ '"F? "1 ~- .':.. 'i !'l " ;"'\f1LLJ~Jl~.lId:;~I'D:~l~
\ ov'/ ......-(,. :, ~ I I II I I rr, Flll~~ . ~
\. ". ,.. , ..~~
'R3- : 1 T.ll" 'r-t,,~'?
- '-:j: .~ " ~ II" 1fT l/~ ~
i\ ~ ca j i.,...1 ~E -al~" .. {!J;l;.... ~1iTllli .J.WJr. :::;
":: :' ::; TT T -R ' IIll!l111JIII "'-YI ~q
::."w.......:~' ~ 0 ~~ ' :~. < ==- In lIIIIlIDDD I' 1I1'IUII "'Ill .
........ L- HeM v rr "1~. 1'" ~ ~ I "jU' II
" "If t- ~ C ' ;1 · . ;.. i. L..-"" I _ I J ":ITTTlJf ' I II
,. f,:' ~rr "''I''' 1"11. ~tK :1 I
, 11 tS :;; tT.l.. \ '------ m illm ~ Ill'
," '. ~ ;1 .1 I 11'1,1-
r~c.""", ~ .:."C. . ,\ '
<' ' ~ ~ i,~~ ,~ r ' ~~\ \
>,.i~<li?t;~~~':..~~~ L It>\\ P~D
, l~f ~ '/'.A.."'.... ,:.~~ ,- .~~ r- [ LU1.5.0
:- I . ,~/:~ ~~ ............/ ,', ',;" /....
'/ '" ~ ',: , ~
,- --' " ,. .. ,'- ( .. , >\,.,' '- i IG HT
" rrr"': ,..... /A ../",., ,,/ /.4 9\, "w "",LBR
:~.;)~~' ~r-...",~~.. ",., . ':~d~~~ '~LACE"
" ~ ',,- ~ //'~~~ ~ '" ~..~ f, \ L.
~:~.. /' ," "t.. ,,' \\C;,'~, \
,,', .,<~: .,.. ".. = ,: ..., (\\ "., u: ~~' ,
, . ":\\ ~~l. .. .....s.c..j! ! 'T"'"" ~' \ ~ \ '.,
" . , T 'YJ .. ~ ~ i
1+ ___ i "'" _,_ __~:.~~ ~ I~ '--t '
( ~~ : ~ lfTP "'AlEC -I I ;rm ~~ ,,J...-J).
1\.bjJ~ ~:: rC SITE!j [,[J~
[, )T~ T '. T ~~'-' L..--"- . A. ~ 006'
'~l ~.I'G~ - .,' ,,~
,-'- ! -,... R'3 ~ ~.::1"1 C3: '
($ IV .~ /." ....~t! t v'~ ~()(".8/lIt;HT ""oJNff~ ~ " ' "
J f-lll " i ~IRJTrll...'1 ''II ,17L1..... :/
f- ... - I I ~ 10. C ~:< I To' ,. ~,' ^ ""7 ~
".1 . ~, f- I.., f) . I
S:. J' ..<< ~~ l.l :.:' ltI~ iJ,JfL.. ~- --.J:
.. . ,-< ~ /Y r': 'i I . ~
rrm .. . ~x y; ~ "J/#. . , . 1 " ,
Jtt } / ;: '! AEC ,~~> >- I ~~ }-~~' ~ IJI D~... R
- N IN , J ..::::: ~ \J -.
1'1 I I,~"'~"< "'~~ ~~~' "~~.' , I:'
.~ ~~~'x x~:t...Y/ .. -- -.
~ ~ ~ ,F'~ .I. ~~~ ~ ~~~', l~... .:1) j/
1 ~J ~l~~,- rvv "\.~/ \' -=~ (~t-7J
i ':::1-- ~ ~ "-(... ~ ~... '/
i 'j. :Z--~~ -p... " i :(~D
,II,. . ~ "'-J. rr >>' .['-..,' G..~fI'
~ :=J 'Y~~,.Ty1.~~~~~~~-*~:'l ~W~Ul~~ afJ~,~
. -..........--~ . 1'-.' z: /' Jl Tl I U. ~::: ~
( / " . fI/I/, I lEE ~ 'I ~
1~:3 '.0. 1/8 MILESl, ../' T ]: / .... Wi t;-n =- 1)=-.."
, ~ ~ T - ~ I , 0' W2 R ,,+- - -.1- :11"'(': L
[' 1"0 400800 FEE I~' t ... f-- - ---,
'[I I ' ('/,..ANN/Nt; Ot;,pr. 3~'5.f t-i., .' ;' E .~ tf.. ,.lJt,tAi L-
';/\'/ ,! r j IT ,. ~ '. \ \, \ I II I It ~ f nl;l~~lf-l;:'~" -E~" Ilrn-m I ~.
11111 U ;-::.:::~
1\11 - · - El [:
-Iii
R == =
E = =-
C = "
..~' - ~
, 'I ow ~.,
1 ,
C''1 .
rDIITill
-r:mill
I
-
;;;;
-
I \
~ ~
f--- t- Ul
Rr r" T rn
~e!
m~
11111 ~
~ l! .I!!~
\!ffiIElIffi ,111
'+1
~I . I ~I
, -I
TI1T,i,! II ',..;.I
.~
PUt"
\ ~.
u~~
r! ~'_ ~
1[ ~l
. --, f]
~
~ / p-~~ ~--
~.--
J 7~..., (r'
fJA(6 ---
~~t
-
--
~1
~-
\
\
w ~
BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Office of Professional Standards
To:
From:
Date:
Re:
Tambri Heyden. Directo~
Lt. James Cwnmings ~
28 February 1995
Shoppes of Woolbright, P,C,D.
TRC Memo # 95-0121
The comments that I have regarding this project concern S,W, 8 Street, and the curb cuts made
north of the entrance at Woolbright. Althougb I have no problems with the curb cuts themselves,
I would like to see deceleration lanes placed at tbe sights of these cuts, in order to facilitate
motorists, and to keep the roadway free from unnecess8IY congestion.
......~
m
muwrn~
FE"" .... 8 II it'i;
1) .: ! L
I
,',
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
//f
MINUTES - CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA
MARCH 21. 1995
should vote on this matter without the applicant making a presentation. Mayor
Hanmening pointed out that their current concurrency in all of their master plan
approvals expired months ago. Therefore, they are in arrears.
Motion
Vice Mayor Matson moved to table Items VIII.B.1, VIII.B.2 and VIII.B.3 until the
April 18, 1995 City Commission meeting. Mayor Pro Tem Bradley seconded the
motion which carried 4-1. Mayor Harmening cast the dissenting vote.
City Attorney Cherof requested that Item VIII.B.4 be tabled so l~ql..)i~b~;i~e ;.-:tD -/...;:'.'.-
discussed at a shade meeting this Friday at 3:00 p.m. He added Item X.D.1
(Update on the Finizio Appeal).
2. Adoption
Motion
Vice Mayor Matson moved to approve the agenda as amended. Mayor Pro Tem Bradley
seconded the motion which carried 5-0.
II. ADMINISTRATIVE
A. Appointments to be ..de
Appointment
To Be Made
II Bradl ey
II Brad 1 ey
III Jaskiewicz
I I Bradl ey
II Bradl ey
III Jaskiewicz
I Rosen
III Jaskiewicz
IV Matson
Mayor Harmeni ng
I Rosen
IV Matson
I Rosen
II I Jask i ewi cz
Mayor Hanmeni ng
I Rosen
Regl
Board Al t
Education Advisory Board Alt
Board of Adjustment Alt
Cemetery Board Alt
Education Advisory Board Alt
Board of Adjustment Reg
Nuisance Abatement Board Reg
Civil Service Board Alt
Education Advisory Board Reg
Education Advisory Board Reg
Planning & Development Alt
Code Enforcement Board Reg
Senior Advisory Board Reg
Education Advisory Board Reg
Community Relations Board Alt
Community Redev. Adv. Brd. Reg
Children and Youth Adv. Brd. Reg
Length of Term
Expiration Date
Term expires 4/95 TABLED
2 yr term to 4/96 TABLED
1 yr term to 4/95 TABLED
Tenm expi~es 4/95 TABLED
Term expires 4/97 TABLED
Term expires 4/95 TABLED
Term expires 4/95 TABLED
Term expires 4/95 TABLED
Term expires 4/95 TABLED
Term expires 4/95 TABLED
Term expires 9/97 TABLED
Tenm expires 4/96 TABLED
Tenm expires 6/95 TABLED
Tenm expires 4/95 TABLED
Tenm expires 8/95 TABLED
Term expires 4/96
All tabled appointments were left on the table. Commissioner Rosen tabled his
appointment to the Children and Youth Advisory Board.
- 2 -
MINUTES OF THE CITY COMMISSION MEETING HELD IN COMMISSION
CHAMBERS, CITY HAlL, BOYNTON BEACH, flORIDA, ON
TUESDAY, MARCH 21, ~99S, AT 6:30 P.M.
PRESENT
Edward Hanmening, Mayor
Lynne Matson, Vice Mayor
Matthew Bradley, Mayor Pro Tern
Shirley Jaskiewicz, Commissioner
Sidney Rosen, Commissioner
Carrie Parker, City Manager
James Cherof, City Attorney
Sue Kruse, City Clerk
I. OPENINGS
A. Call to Order
B. Invocation - James E. Henry - Deeper Life Fellowship Full Gospel
Church
C. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag
Mayor Hanmening called the meeting to order at 6:31 p.m. James E. Henry of the
Deeper Life Fellowship Full Gospel offered the invocation. The Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag was led by Mayor Hanmening.
D. Agenda Approval
1. Additions, Deletions, Corrections
Mayor Pro Tern Bradley tabled Item IX.B.1 (Authorization for Goal Setting Team
Building for the City Commission and City Department Heads) until the next
meeting. He felt this item should have the new mayor's input. He replaced
this item with an update on the Poinciana Elementary School MaDnct, and added
Item IX.B.2 (Update on the Funding for the Boynton Cornmun~ty Life Center).
Vice Mayor Matson added Item IV.A.2 (Pennies fOr P.A.L.) and Item IV.A.3 (Easter
Egg Hunt Extravaganza). She changed itera IX"A,2 to read, "Two Re-solutions
Pertaining to Lawrence Road". She also added Item IX.A.3 (Florida League of
Cities Legislative Session).
Commissioner Rosen asked that Item III.C.3 be tabled. City Manager Parker asked
Mark Law of the Utilities Department if there is a timetable on the Joint
Participation Agreement. Mr. Law advised that a specific deadline was not
given.
City Manager Parker deleted Item III.B.3. She explained that this needs to be
rebid because it is not a one-year extension for the same product.
~---.- -
_7 ;Jht.: [......fI.~'; ~.;c
City Manager Parker advised that she received a letter from Kilday & Associates,
requesting that Items VIII.B.l, VIII.B.2 and VIII.B.3 be tabled until the
April 18, 1995 meeting. Mayor Hanmening was not in favor of tabling these
items. Vice Mayor Matson felt the Commission should honor the request to table
because the letter states that an additional thirty days is needed to solidify
timetables for development. In addition, she did not think the Commission
--~-,. - ,,..-.----...
.>t.. "'__'''' ,-",
- 1 -
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTI
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-107
VIII. DEVELOPMENT PLANS
B.4
cc: Plan, Dev, Util
Agenda Memorandum for
March 21, 1995 City Commission Meeting
TO:
Carrie Parker
City Manager
Tarnbr i J. Heyden ~ -; Ii
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
SUBJECT:
March 16, 1995
Shoppes of Woolbright PCD - MPMD 95-001
Master Plan Modification subdivide Tract C,
redistribute square footage within the three outbuildings
located on Tract C, relocate a driveway on the east side
of S.W. 8th Street and make a medican cut in S.W. 8th
Street for the relocated driveway.
DATE:
Please place the above-referenced request on the March 21, 1995
Ci ty Commission agenda under Development Plans, Non-consent agenda.
DESCRIPTION: This is a request to amend the previously approved
master plan for the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD, located at the
northeast corner of Woolbright Road and the E-4 Canal. The changes
include approval to subdivide Tract C to create outbuilding 3 on a
.895 acre property, revise the outbuilding sizes (outbuilding 1
from 4,300 to 6.920 square feet, outbuilding 2 from 5,000 to 5,755
square feet and outbuilding 3 from 4,300 to 2,625 square feet), add
a driveway on the east side of S.W. 8th Street, 400 feet north of
Woolbright Road, relocate the existing driveway on the east side of
S.W. 8th Street, from 290 feet to 260 feet north of Woolbright Road
and provide a median cut on S. W. 8th Street for the relocated
driveway.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board, with a 5-1
vote, recommended denial of this request. The basis for the denial
was that the proposed changes were not consistent with the court
ordered stipulation agreements.
TJH/pb
c :ccmtg321. shp
1
..,
~
f_
7.B.l
SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT PCD
MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
II
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-090
*REVISED MARCH 13, 1995
TO:
Chairman and Members
Planning and Developemnt Board
THRU:
Tambri J. Heyden
planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
Michael E. Haag
Zoning and Site Development Administrator
DATE:
March 10, 1995
SUBJECT: Shoppes of Woolbright peD - File No. MPMD 95-001
Master plan modification (driveway, median cut and shift
in outparcel sizes and boundaries)
NATURE OF REQUEST
eeL Consultants, Inc., agent for Howard R. Scharlin, trustee of the
property, is requesting approval to modify the previously approved
master plan for the Shoppes of woolbright PCD, The 31.99 acre
planned commercial development zoned property, approved for 284,620
square feet of commercial/retail development, is located on the
north side of Woolbright Road and east of the L.W.D,D. E-4 canal.
The proposed changes, described in the attached letter from CCL
Consultants, dated February 14, 1995 (see Exhibit "A") are itemized
below. In addition to the changes stated in the letter of
submittal, a second driveway is requested located on the east side
of S .1-/. 8th Street, approximately 400 feet north of the south
property line of the peD (see Exhibit liB" - proposed master plan):
1, Subdivision of Tract C to make outbuilding 3 a separate
,895 acre outparcel. Tract C is located at the
northeast corner of S,W, 8th Street and Woolbright Road
and south of the main entrance into the Home Depot.
* ')
... ,
Change in the size of the outbuilding 3 from a one-story,
4,300 square foot building to a one-story, 2,625 square
foot drive-through, fast food restaurant. A conditional
use application, as required by the zoning code, is in
progress for a drive-through, fast food restaurant as the
use of this outbuilding.
3. Change in the building area of outbuilding 2 from 5,000
square feet to 5,755 square feet.
4. Change in the bUilding area of outparcel 1 from 4,300
square feet to 6,920 square feet.
* 5.
Relocation of the existing driveway located on the east
side of S,W. 8th Street, 30 feet south, from 290 feet to
260 from the south property line of the PCD.
6. A<ldition of a driveway on the east side of s. W. 8th
Street, approximately 400 feet north of the south
property line of the peD. This driveway was requested
on a previous master plan modification that was tabled by
the City Commission; therefore it has been added to this
request.
BACKGROUND
The Shoppes of Woolbright pen is part of a November 6, 1986 and
January 24, 1990 stipulated settlement agreement between the City
and Tradewinds Development Corporation. The City Commission
l-atified the settlement agreement by approving a master plan
modification on May 15, 1990 that depicted the applicable
conditions of the January 24, 1990 stipulation and settlement
agreement (see Exhibit "e" - master plan pursuant to the 1990
stipulate~ set tlemen t agreement). The agreement vested the proj ect
fOl- trafflc, t'1ater and se-V-ler, so that no time extensions for
..
-(
l/
,.,
JO ~JEd SE papnl~ul ~ou sl Ja~ua~ UapJED aq~ JO aDe~ooJ aJEnbs
aq~ '~uaWaaJDE ~uawal~~as 0661 aq~ o~ ~UEnSJnd '~aa~ a~Enbs
O<:1'8~ o~ ~aaJ a_lEnDS SL('61 WO.1J paSEa_l~ul _la~ua; U;:.P_H?D
aqJ, . ~odaa awoq aq~ '4E ~a~ua;) uap~ED aq:. 0'4 ~aaj a.1EnDs
SvL '8 JO uOl~lPPE aq~ apnl~ul o~ ~sanba_l - [661 JO lP_H'YJ
. .....
Co
'atqE'4 aq'4 WO~} paAow~~
~ou SEM ~sanbaJ aq~ a'4E~lpu1 sp~o~aJ ~~l~ JO Ma1AaJ V 'anssl
aq'4 uo spUlMapEJ.1 JO} lasuno~ q~lM Ja}uo~ o~ paqslM ~au~o~'4V
^~ l~ aq'4 '4Eq~ PUE aSE~ spulMapEJ.!. aq'4 ul u01~ow DUlPuad
E }O aSnE;)aq AaUJO~~V A~ 1;) aq~ }O ~sanbaJ aq~ ~E patqE~
SEM '4-SanDaJ atp ~Eq~ a~E'4S SOU1'4-aaw UOlSS1WWO~ A~l~ 1661
'61 Jaqwa'4das PUE 1661 'O~ ~sn6nv aq'4 WOJ} sa~nu1w aqJ, 'PEOH
~qo1JqIooM UO ~EMaA1Jp IEu01~lPPE aq~ JO u01~da~xa aq'4 l{'41M
''4 sanba.! atp }O lEAOJddE papuaWWo~aJ pJEog aq.!. '1661' ~ 1
'4snonv uo (pJ~Oa ~uawdolaAaa pu~ 6U1UUEld al{~ SE UMOU~ MOU)
pJEOg OU1UoZ PUE OU1UUEId al{'4- o~ pa~uasaJd S~M ~sanbaJ sll{J,
'(~uawaaJ6e ~uawaI~~as 0661 al{~ ~q paMoIIE ~lWll aq'4 ~lq~lM)
'4aa} aJEnbs 082:'LH: o~ 08S'STE WOJ} a~d aq'4 ~O} aOE'400}
aJEnbs lE~o~ aq~ 6ulsEa_l~ul ~qa_laq~ '~aa} aJenbs OOL' 1 JO
aSEa~~ul ~au e U1 pa~InsaJ aoe'4oo} aJenbs o~ SUOl~E~l}lpOW alIJ,
'a~ls ~odaa aWOH aq~ pue
~aa.l~S q~8 'M'S }O ap1s ~sea aq~ uo pa~E~ol SIa~JEd~no
aq~ uaaM~aq u01~~auuo~ aISlE ssa~~E q~JOU aq~ a'4EulwlI3 '}
PUE !Sla~Jed~no Ja~ua~
6u1ddoqs a4~ o~ speaT ~E4~ '4-aaJ~s 4~8 'M'S }O ap1s ~sEa
aq~ uo pa'4E~oI AEMaA1JP paAo~ddE a4~ pJEMq~nos a~E;)oIaH 'a
!~aaJ~S q~8 'M'S
}O ap1s '4-s~a al{'4- uo pa'4-~;)oT STa;)J~d~no .la~ua~ oU1ddoqs
aq~ 0'4 4aaJ~S q48 'M'S WOJ} AeMaAlJp .laq~ouE JO uOl41PPV 'P
~ qfmOJl{~-aA 1-lP
q41M ~u~q ~ooJ aJ~nbs 000' 9 'AJ04 S-OM~ E o~ 6ulPI1nq
11E'4-a.1 '4-00} aJ~nbs OO('v ~ WO.1} '4-aaJ~S 4'4-8 'M'S PUE PEOH
~401JqTooM JO .1aUJO~ ~s~aq4.10U a4'4- 4e Ta~.1Ed4nO aq~ }O
asn }O U01~~u61sap pu~ sa1.10~s }O .1aqwnu 'az1s U1 aDuEq~ '~
!(TE~~lwqns a4'4- WO.1} '~u~~lTddE aq~
~q UM~.1p4~lM S~M '4-sanba.1 a4~ JO U01~.1od slq~) u01~e~s SED
~OOJ aJ~nbs OS"1 E O~ TE1~.1awwo~ 11E~aJ JO '4-aaJ aJenbs
OOO'v WO.1J ~aaJ~S 4'4-8 'M'S pu~ peoH ~4D1JqTooM }O JaUJO~
~saMq~~ou aq'4 ~~ Ta;)JEd~no aq~ }O aZ1s pu~ asn u1 aDuEq;) 'q
1'4-8a.1'4-S l{'4-8 'M'S JO '4-saM
pa~E~ol 'p~OH ~401JqTooM O~UO ~~MaA1.1p Mau E }O U01'4-1PPV 'E
:6U1MOII0J a4'4- 8pnl~u1 o~ ~sanbaJ - 1661 }O Aew 'Z
'6861 'I, JaqwaAoN uo ~sanba~
S14'4- paAoJdde u01ss1wwo~ A'4-1~ a4.1 . ~aaJ a~Enbs 08S' S 1 (
~e pa6uEq~un pau1Ewa.l a;)d a4'4- .1oJ a6e'400J aJEnbs le404 aqJ,
'J8~Ua~ Uap.1~D '4-00} a.l~nDS SL(J61 e PUE 11~'4-8.1 }O '4-aa} aJEnbs
OS~',01 papnl~u1 q~lqM (~odaa awoH) aJo'4-s sIE1Ja4ew oU1PI1nq
e JO u01~lPPE al{'4- apnl~u1 0'4- ~sanbaJ 6861}0 Jaqo~~o '1
:Ma1AaJ .10} pa~'4-1wqns uaaq aAeq SU01'4-E~1}lPOW
Ueld Ja'4-s~w 6U1MOII0} aq'4- '~U8W8a.1D~ ~uawal'4-'4-as lEU1Dl.lO alI~ a~ulS
'~aa} aJenbs 08S'S1E ~IUO s~;)al}aJ
UEId Ja~sew 0661 aq~ 'JaA8MOH 'UEld .1a~sew ~uaWal'4~as 0661 aq'4 -
II~II ~ 1q14xS uo pa~~ldap '4-noAEl pue sasn all'4- apnl~ul o~ '~aa} a.lEnbs
OOO'OZE JO wnw1xew e paAo.ldde '4-uawaa.16e ~uawaI~~as aq.1 '~~Jado.ld
aq~ JO ~no-Pl1nq 04 J01Jd 'paJ1nba.l aq JaAa PInoM .l~ua.l~n~UO~
5661 '6 q~.1EW
pJeog ~uawdoTaAaa PUE 6U1UUEld :0.1
,
II
3
To: Planning and Development Board
March 9, 1995
the retail gross leasable area, The request included
adjusting property lines to accommodate the expansion and the
total square footage of the project remained at 315,580.
On April 20, 1993 the City Commission approved the 8,745
square foot expansion subject to staff comments! and on August
10, 1993 the Planning and Development board approved a waiver
of platting for the adjusted property lines in connection with
the expansion.
4. March of 1993 - request to include the following:
a, Subdivision of Tract B to create a ,957 acre outparcel,
Tract B is that portion of the PCD that is located on the
west side of S.W, 8th Street;
b. Change in use and size of the outparcel at the northwest
corner of Woolbright Road and S,W. 8th street from 4,000
square feet of retail commercial to a 3,040 square foot
gas station (resurrection of the portion of the 1991
request that was withdrawn by the applicant);
c, Add two new driveways into the proposed service station
outparcel - one on S. W. 8th street and the other on
Woolbright Road;
d. Allow a canopy over the gasoline pumps to encroach the
setbacks due to a difference in the service station
regulations in effect in 1986 vs, the service station
regulations in effect in 1993; and
e, Reduce the building square footage specified on the
master plan for Tract B from 62,000 to 55,040 square
feet.
With this request, the total square footage of the PCD
decreased 6,960 square feet from 315,580 to 308,620, On April
20, 1993 the City Commission approved the request, subject to
staff comments. As a result of the traffic evaluation of the
proposed service station use, the square footage on Tract B
decreased 24,000 square feet from a total of 55,040 square
feet (52 I 000 commercial/retail plus 3,040 convenience
s tore/gasol ine sales) to 31,040 square feet ( 28,000
commercial/retail plus 3,040 convenience store/gasoline
sales) , Therefore, the total square footage of the PCD
decreased 24,000 square feet from 308,620 to 284,620 square
feet.
ANALYSIS
Changes in Planned Commercial Development (PCD) master plans are
reviewed consistent with, Section 6,f,13,b, of Appendix A - Zoning
as follows:
b, "Modifications to approved plans which resul t in an
increase of less than ten (10) per cent in measurable
impacts as determined by including any changes in traffic
generated, water consumed or sewage to be collected will
require review and recommendation the planning and zoning
board and final approval by the city commission. The
city commission decision to approve, approve with
modifications or jeny, shall be predicated upon a finding
of consistency with the comprehensive plan and a finding
that any such increase will not resul t in a negative
impact on infrast~ucture delivery systems or the
surrounding area in general. It is the intent of this
-=-'
-)
~
...,
. '
4
To: Planning and Development Board
March 9, 1995
section that all additional impacts be mitigated.. ,"
Based on the documentation provided, the changes to the three
outparcels would generate in excess of a ten (10) per cent increase
in water consumed and sewage collected, if the approved outparcels
are evaluated against the proposed outparcels, An increase of only
2,8% in water consumed and sewage collected results if the proposed
outparcels are evaluated against the entire PCD water and sewer
impacts, In either scenario, the utility Department does not have
an objection to the analysis provided and has not indicated that
the increase will have a negative impact on the infrastruture
delivery systems, A slight increase in pervious area will result
in a minimal, positive impact on the PCD drainage.
with respect to traffic, the traffic information submitted
indicates that the traffic generated by the three outparcels will
generate less than a ten (10) percent change. This information
has been forwarded to Palm Beach County, The results of the review
by the County have not been received at the time of this report,
The following is an evaluation of each of the proposed changes
listed on page one of this report:
1. subdivision of Tract C to make outbuilding 3 a separate
outparcel and the redistribution of square footage among the
outparcels As indicated in the stipulation settlement
agreement, this is acceptable, Platting or a waiver of
platting (at the determination of the City Engineer) to
subdivide this parcel is required. As required, outparcels
shall be self-sufficient with respect to lot size, setbacks,
parking and other PCD zoning district requirements,
2. Relocation of the existing driveway on the east side of S,W,
8th street, south of the main entrance into the shopping
center (Home Depot) - One entrance, in addition to the main
entrance, was allowed pursuant to the 1990 settlement
agreement, This existing driveway is the additional driveway
referenced in the agreement, The proposed location of this
additional driveway is closer to the original position
(centrally located) identified in the Barton-Aschman traffic
report, upon which the traffic conditions of the 1990
settlement agreement were based,
3, Addition of a second driveway on the east side of S,W. 8th
street, between Woolbright Road and the main entrance to the
shopping center (Home Depot) - As mentioned in previous item
=2, the number of driveways is specifically limited in the
1990 settlement agreement, The addition of a second driveway
is inconsistent with the 1990 settlement agreement, Since the
Barton-Aschman report does not require an additional driveway
to be added, it could be argued that this driveway is not
needed and that safety and level of service are not impaired
without it.
Furthermore, this type of access design is contrary to the
intent and purpose of a PCD, which is to provide for a planned
(not piece-meal) , programmed series of development operat ions,
designed as a whole through integration of principle buildings
and ou~buildings that are linked via common use of access and
infrastructure and similar architecture and other aesthetic
elements. specifically with respect to access, this
additional driveway defeats the purpose of requiring internal
access roads and driveways to serve parcels within a planned
develcpment.
It should also be noted that the Barton-Aschman report stated
4
5
To: Planning and Development Board
March 9, 1995
that the driveway on the east side of S.W. 8th street located
north of the existing main entrance driveway was to be
de:eted, The proposed master plan still reflects this
driveway as being approved.
4, Median cut in S,W, 8th street If approved, this new
intersection would capture much of the traffic anticipated and
designed to be received by the main driveway that is located
at the entrance to Home Depot. The main driveway is centrally
located for the major portion of the retail uses located on
the east side of S,W, 8th street, Since the Barton-Aschman
report did not recommend a median cut, it could be argued that
the proposed median cut is not consistent with the traffic
report referenced in the 1990 settlement agreement and
therefore not needed or possibly affecting level of service,
Therefore, if the median cut is approved, it is recommended
that a new analysis of the turning movements be submitted to
determine the impact the median cut will have on S. W. 8th
Street and Woolbright Road.
Also, the proposed median cut would cause the east driveway
into the site to become a major driveway which requires a one
hundred (100) foot throat; the distance from the property line
to a parking space or an access aisle, This would
significantly impact the parking design of outbuilding 3,
CONCLUSION
This request was reviewed by the Technical Review Committee (TRC)
on February 28, 1995 and the committee raised no objections at the
time. However; -the committee did not have technical data regarding
the impact the median cut and additional driveway would have on the
surrounding roadways or the project itself. If this driveway and
median cut are approved by the Commission, the Police Department
recommends that north and south deceleration lanes be required at
the cut to avoid congestion from motorists slowing down to make
turns at this location (see Exhibit liD" Police Department
Memorandum No. 95-0121) , It is also recommended that if any
changes are approved by the Commission that are not reflected, or
are contrary to, the proposed master plan, that three copies of a
revised master plan be submitted to the Planning and Zoning
Department, prior to submittal of any future PCD requests. The
Planning and Zoning Department is not making a specific
recommendation on this request since components of the request are
inconsistent with the latest settlement agreement. Deviation from
this agreement are viewed as policy decisions of the Commission.
tjh
Attachments
xc: Central File
A:WoolPCD
/:~~-
'--
..
-
.,
f,Xll1-B1-T A
{)
CCl CONSULTANTS, INC.
Consulting Engineers m
Surveyors
Planners '
2200 PARK CENTRAL BLVD., N, SUITE 100, POMPANO BEACH, FL 33064, (305) 974-2200. FAX (305) 973-2686
February 14, 1995
Hand Delivery
Ms. Tambri Heyden
Planning Director
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Re: SHOPPBS OF WOOLBRIGHT PCD
Boynton Beach, Florida
CCL project No. 3~ol
Dear Ms. Heyden:
Enclosed herewith please find the following:
1. Twelve (12) signed and sealed prints of the revised master
plan for the above-referenced project.
2. A check made payable to the City of Boynton Beach in the
amount of $500.00.
3. Letter of Authorization form owner for CCL Consultants, Inc.
to act as. agent for this matter.
Please be advised that we are herein submitting for master plan
amendment for the above-referenced project. We are proposing to
amend the existing master plan as follows:
A. outparcel 1 will be revised from 4300 SF to 6920 SF.
B. Outparcel 2 will be revised from 5000 SF to 5755 SF.
C. Outparcel 3 will be revised from a 2-story 6000 SF bank to a
1-story 2625 SF Taco Bell Fast Food Restaurant with a drive-
thru lane.
D. The locations of the driveways for these outparcels onto S.W.
8th street will be revised from what is presently shown on the
existing master plan. In addition, we are proposing a median
cut in the S.W. 8th street median which aligns with one of the
proposed relocated driveways as well as prior-approved
driveway location on the west side of S.W. 8th street.
t~
/
ow'
..
1W
Ms. Tambri Heyden
CCL project No. 3101
February 14, 1995
Page two
We respectfully request that this proposed master plan amendment be
placed on the next Technical Review Committee agenda and thusly on
the next available Planning & Development Board as well as City
eommission Aqenda.
Should you have any questions or need any additional information,
>"', please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
panile, Jr., P.E., P.L.S.
ject Manager
LRC/kag
Enclosure
cc: Mike Morton, Tradewinds Group
Eduardo earcache, P.E., ,eKE Group, Inc.
CCl CONSULTANTS, INC.
'7
E~ll1.B1.'t B
r:r
,-- ..-------'
---- --- ----------~ -----------
w "'...'
........0
;.....~
;;~.
:ccr;
::=~~
~l';_
~"'!:
~~:
Q'"
I....
a-~
~Cl"
:jlI
.
z
z
..
..
-ar...n
~g~~
=:~~
~!l",6
;0-4..
~.z:~
;i~
6=:;
.0..
t:!~
~;c~
~~!:
..0
=O~
III
S
;;:
is
o
~
(/l
o
III
ii'
.....
.'
!:Xl
~
.;fnN ..
::e~
.,..z!
I......Z
wica
;:'.. i"
"',."'m
0"<
i!~~
~?~
....K
~S;
.....
.....
~8
....
i3
..
~
15
z
-:lENUI
~::g~
:;~~
>>,..000(
.!.Eln
:=~i
~~~-'
"'....
, ....
....z
......
0"'''''-
.. ,
5 ..
~ z
.. "
~ i
~ ~
~
..
>=
::l~1
..iSi
i~i
1ft a.
,~
;lI!"1
~~.
~~i
-,...
&..0..
..."'o~
......~
W."C..
101.160
1,....%
"C3l~
:..!3
_mr"'2I
~;o
::z:ZC
.. ~;:
...<..
......
OZ"
~~:w
"'UI~
~S~
::;
-..~
Sin
;;:0
~i
..'"
:l!
~
~
~
i
-i~n
~ gP
.. In
;:!!ii
~Ill e
g/!i~"
.% ..~
;lI ~'
w ..~
~u
ii~
n
o
III
>=
~~
m g II> t13i= ,_______ po.\.-
~ ;5:1: Y cpo!'
6 -+""~< o. ~::..~
,,1 _ : p ." ~'S. 'ItI~' ,;.. Uo
3C g ~ - r- .0 · \,., ~
~nm i ;m i:~ ~ ~.>!~~ ~'
-4 , ~ !~'i~ .... ",;" -----;.;-----~
-4 \\~ L~i~~f~..;~ '/
i ,,'. ~ V .'r'II~~~ ' / / ,
I r r '. "-I ~;~~<-__ 00 ~.;
\ . i .. ... 81 '
'\ II L~lmi' I /-:.~ j /~/ =
'I. '~i- . n - -! --t -- ~ /-'[7 I
\ . J ~~ u ,w I'. b - _ ~ -==J----</,~ /
~_ 0 ;... .. ~ ~~ .p.-;::=.' I rt II....... It I p,....,........
. .! '<l -L~ r 1 / I I , .~~
1 L; , 1 SUa llt! I './ ~ ___I ~--------=::~..,.~
\ ' z: - "!!l t 3> S ~ d'''1 ~ ,J.. ,,,,,~. i-~ ~
1 :'~;\J::. .-h~-r4L,L-~~' f ~,.... ilrt~\:: ----------- --------------
, , ~___ __, __ ~f'o\' e _-------- "-
_ _ 44' 51 1..." _ - ...("l~
^ !=I'" ....""''''''.TO~."A:1'!. W,' TN -"" ----- ~I;::
r- !~ ~~':.~~:.:'.:;,;~..~; it ~. --- ? ""1"- L'"~OC'" ...... _ ___, ~ ===----_ ~ - - ',> ---- __- .L'
"~~t::Cf711 .'f~~ii/, '-~r;;1f
1;;:H1~ . I ,~~i ~.~~~I r ,~ " .
i\~' . ,,\;,_>=~;-= ~ ~'_ -,-:' :.~I I y,..----.._A)"
I' \ ~ -, --- :'L" " I / -------------~ /
',. .1 "Ii W l--;~-i-:b:f=-"''ft- u L "'()/ --", - -,-4 .~
;: '\'-' Il ,ilo ~ ~t:l- ~~~O~- ~: ~: '!]\ ~~ri/ J . \= - A
\I "n ~ ~. ~ --V r "=------ '/""
'J ~., ~, ~\) il i . -- la: / - : /.. i '1
; I ,\i ~' . . - ~ \ ; F,r -7",\_ - - ~~ I
;!~ It u U U\ If 11 '---H..._____'----t / -!' i
--'to <1,_, '.., \ ~\ ~= :/;'>-" ='\~ ,I ~l'l
~ \ \ =., t !-- -' : \ ~_ ~ \ i
, <i. ~" "', I 'flftij --= y~ 1\
[ 11 ,J I ~~- :~.:~.\,--~ ~: ": ~~)~~~\:\,\II~l \.j
~.~;I~ ~~ ~i II:': -..,,!, I ;{1:1 I
~~~: :11 - ~~!. I~~ [1--.:::-, \'~ W-
''I ~~2::1 (It ;t. J I
I :1~;1 ..:;: .:11. .---'--- ' "~ ".....~t-
~1II11 \ i ~
'111~1"'!'!I:lltr' 1r:". - ,;~,_~ ''r~'- .c !_I:~.) _, .' . J.
" ,L ~ ~~--;;.~ ~-~ ,I '. .,,,1
i' I """....'.'.9". --~" ...._-;t~;:.J
:: \ ___ ~f - - - - - I ".'We. C)IIW1 ~ !.
I =Q " - -- --- -"- . --- -- - . ~. ;.:;
, l' .., ... ...,.,,, I ;;>1~4 _ - -......... ....-- - -=-
I . I -.:;: I-'=':....- '"- ~-
t----------:,.;..L...HcnOM-..-----i--------~i!~--r ,o;,-i=:'. .n.. 0;
I: ~ 1:0=1 Ii =,
i r ~ i ~ ~ S'Co!':oo ~t~~ROAD ~ ~
t 5 ~a= J>
. ~ ~~~. '~lC
~ ~!
: >>~ ~
o ~
~
8
0....
e~
~21~
jO~~
~:;J
~~
J!!m
'V
i:
~
.,.,
,.,
n
.0
,..&
=1
....'
Illn
..-
~
n
-0
=1'
0..
:~
..-
~
..
I .
--------~f~ 1 ~
/ 'ji
I
"-
"--
=
;
HI
In
Hi
In
lu
t-~
:""~
i!i
~!I
;,-
iJ
I-!'
lis
.~ U\
- .~
~ 0
.. III
...
.. .. VI
; = =t
.... m
.. ..
g 2 0
.. ~ !;
~ .. )Ii
.. ..
..
.. ~ -
.. n
~ i
.. I:
= ;;
o tl
~
~
..
,.
F
lljl'l ;rl:l~i~TWI'rl;;II!!lIII; li
': i 'I; ',.0".""1"1 i.,i. 'dll;
,. r. ,=ilj ~IUit l~ t~J, I '11
ll'!i 1"Ii.ll'!"""':j' 4:' \....
. 1 1~'lrl'rllrn'ZI~I:..1 d;1 ~...
I " ~.J i1 illl\.l ;'1" '1'1 hi
;!I: "I it ,.1 ,',
I' [, ".~~i I':' I
" 'l'la) ,il I
I F ~! .J ~i: ~~l I ~
II; I' '1::,11 :I~I II
I ;l,o, ?~.?- it:; !~
f! i!i 'Jh,' {lit ~i
i!i 'f, !;Ji ':L !
i I ;::hi~ .:~,t !i5 !!
r~llia:;!~1 f;f~1 iff:
:;:;,!, ' :11' 'l'.
'1;<!E lUtl!..!, ':
::;;Ilt h:iJ ,f: }I
i~;if~l ~
ii
l~
;!
H
1/
!~
I ~ I
I;~
~ e
;: :
.. ..
< ,.
g 5
III :I
i i
,. ;;
..
"
;jj~
~; ~
g~ ~
"'0 t
~Si ~
a ~
l ~ g !
i 5 : ;
~ ~ ~
~~?t..
"~i~
~ r
r-
)Ii
Z
o
c:
VI
m
tD
'" :D
.. m
= ~
~8
::o~:Z~
o h: Vi
...iZ
:ga~
..1 m
~i~VI
I: ~
-. .
is: I
a- ·
.~I
...!!. .
ig I
ii ~
..,0
-~ ~
~;
~.g
- -
, .
i.c
q
:.
, .
~ a
:"2
. I
.. ~
. .
" .
~ .
s!~~=~;I
;:~~~~~=
~~~~~~;
m",-c_.a;l
~;~~i~2
"'O"ll~D"''-
c:z';;; ... "'1ft
~!ll~E!"':;~
!~a.1:~O
~ffi!aan;
~,:~~i~~
"tIm~~...z
~~ ",O"'~
"Cl n<""gl:
O~~"i"'~
~;:~lm~...
~~5=~="
~~~~i;;
rn z:3l..,
(;Q.Z~~~
~~5S=::~
zoo6zo.c
....~oaD"IIc:
=44a!"'&
o~~~;:
~~C1&SI
~.. z..~
;3IUJ On
"': :D~
!I-
WI'"
;I~
. .
:: !II
:1..
;I~
0101 :::
=;;i ~
~ ~ II
.. : .. ~
I\,J Gl /1l :
~ ~ ~ :
~ ~ ~
.. .
~ ...
~ n :
o !:J #
~
~ -
~ ~
~ ..
~ III
..
~
n
..
...
- ..
~
Kild.v b Assoe.."..
landscilpe Archltccls)Plalln~rS
1551 Forum Place
SUite 10010
West Palm Beach, Florod. 33401
(30516B9.5522
Sc.le 1 . 10'
O.le :1J,IlJ.a
OrrN" By Q"'~
~l\eNo '\20S' 'toR 421.1
CX~ No. a!~3"
SMet~Or
SHOPPES OF WOOLBR~~T
P C 0 0 ft,
BOYNTON BEACH, F~ORIDA ,irZ >;':';
MASTER PLAN' ~ -
"
z
2
~
::Il
~
~
o
m
en
en
::Il
o
JIo
C
..
; ~
~~ ~ ~
~-< mal
.. en ::Il
~ - Ci
~~ ~ :i
~.. z
00 ~;ll
~3~)t
-:0 n
z m
.. 'V
III ,
: ~
~ ?
III
,,';;;'
'0 1110 'It \
.
~
~
!
~
a
~
~
~
z
<
"
~
l\\6
~o
..~
;6
zZ
~~
en)li
::Il"
Z
!:)
..
w
m
v~j
>i~'.
~~
/
-:!, .
k~7~
",
.
..
PROPOSED
i/)
I
E X H I BIT C
,
.
II
. ' ~ iJ:~
:~'~""i !S::: 4
."1'"
T~ ·
:.: =
==i1~
1:1;0
.~_fll!i
~;:
0'"
atn!a
~o'=
:;3
~
z
z
,.
'"
Ul
n
III
it"
-;
I
al
q
Scale. 1 .. 80
Date. ]/2R/gO
Drawn By OAP
F'Il! r-.o 4211
Oroiwlnq No 85-34
Sheet-L-.:lf
ra"'~
&~:;
:~~
a~~
4Z:.
~i~
1I.....
~d;
~I=
:"~
!~=
..~o
..0'"
"'",
5
..
,.
;;
..
.
.~
W'
..
*'
. :,-" ,'- .-.;....~;i1-~ :i~...~~{~!.~ ,~:,-;
';" ~ :'I-:"-~ . ~.
, '
I' .
.~~
1&
-i,tI
~
.......
,"g~
~oil
"",.
~S!..c
silln
=~i
~"'"
Q~e
- :a~
.....z
!i~=\ (
~:. "J,
: ~ I'.
w Z ,
.. ,.
.. ,.
":a I
.~ ~ ,.
I
>,
!i;
.....~
..e:.
.. ,,-.Ut
.....z
s"'~
..!::!l
,.":a
i';i40.
~...~
........
...",.
oz:a
~~:a
..""~
wg I
:~5
-..~
5"
..n
,.0
:=i
0'"
,.
,.
sOiJ4\'"i !lo71il
11115;
"'II!
~ I!! ~ c
a .. Ill! ~
~ 1Il
... ..... .. .. .. :a
:::::C!m
t.:~;::~
; r~ t ~ ~
~::.:z
-- . .. ..
:& ~ ~ l; ~
. . . . .;
, .
1111 ~I ! ~ j ~
s g . J g~ ~ g ~ ~
1I . ~ !1 ,<<0 ~ '" 1; ~
! ~ . ~ -j 0 ~ ,. )Ii
.. CI c'" e ::.
~
:a n
: a
:a I
!:
'0
e
:a
,.
;!
N ~ ..
= N - :6
: ~ S :
~ ~;
..
n n
::::j ~
... ...
n n
g g
~ ~
? ?
111111
II I!mll fll'~
.. .. ,.);2"1Il ~ ~ I m
H -j!~ lit- .
~ ~ l;1g:li~ ~ ~
~- ; . i~~:I~i b I
.. - ~"~i..i1 a I
~ ~:'I~ ~;gl;:!!yO;~1 .'1'
z :..~ . ' ~
o .. . ~!;Gl i
~ :a S "..0-0"'>>0,.) 15-
~ 1ft .. mzZ ~ i. ~
, S i!i <..t-~i..; j"
~ I ~. 2~Ji> ·
ill .. oowil;...ill ~j
n - ~ ~~=8=':~;
It 1: ~ zo~6z!i.c I:
~~ c ~2i~:~i!i
Z m .. ~cc~:z:<. .
p ~ = ~I"'::; l:r
~ ~ ; "'~p!i:::;" g;
.. - if 1;: z..~ ='
. ..~ ~ t
z ~ z
!!':i 1lr:i!I~~!~~m~~ ~m I~ I
II "1;11:1~!,~''";m! jl' h ~
I ;1 :,J1:h~ldll:il~i~ ~Id II j
,I ~~ll,.jtl~~~~,' 'I~ I'
I f': '1-:I!,lf;rI~~:;'1It' ~:. "
f',;I-:'I",,1 ,d I'
'1 Ii !::!~~illle:l~ ~~ I'
II 1'1'''''' "\l!lll,'!t "~I' ,
I Ii i" nWII!: ~i'~t" ~l' ;t! I'
II' "'1"1 "jll"J!o"~1 il~ I
,.~ h ..~ . fL.... , :J.. ..
1P.''1IPI''II' "I~I"i
.( I!'t, as VI. r,r ~ I
; I ;',:11 .i rt:i-' It, I,
'II', ". hi,I;.. JI
! ; II' ,', ~
, 'i
I'
.
I I I,'
o ( I
r, i'I Ii
, 11"'11 "llh '
I , ' !a'h'r.!! I'~,:" I'
I.'" ,"1 I," Ii !l- j. .
, h;~!l.;:tt!!. '!II~I,IIL:C4 .1
.. ..
n .
!;J ~
..-
~~
w",
....
~
,.
III
a... N
~ " iI :I
,,".:..1';:;'1";'1;; SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT
AEV1'SION'S, . P.C.D.
.~~ BOYNTON BE~H. F~ORIDA I'l-
~ MASTER PLAN' \
i
~
;
~
~
n
III
III
:D
o
,.
o
i
s
~..
=ill :D
I.. m
"111
.-
." 0
-,. m
~.. Z
GO ....
, ...-
az ,.
... r-
.0
Z
'm
..
E
,.
III
.~
\ [\"
-=
; ~
; :;
Ii
.~
;,i
~~
i;
;
J
-~
Oq
on
"s
=~
~.
~ii
.1
;!
!
o
~
~
..
10
'"
~
Z
..
'"
III
:D
Z
l:l
Kilday & Associates
Landscape ArchItects/Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach. Florida 33401
'(30516895522
E X H I BIT D
/3
W"
'W
BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Office of Professional Standards
To:
From:
Date:
Re:
Tambri Heyden. Directo~
Lt. James Cwnmings ~
28 FebruaJ)' 1995
Shoppes of Woolbright, P,C.D,
TRC Memo # 95-0121
The comments that I have regarding this project concern S.W. 8 Street, and the curb cuts made
north of the entrance at Woolbright, Although I have no problems with the curb cuts themselves,
I would like to see deceleration lanes placed at the sights of these cuts, in order to facilitate
motorists, and to keep the roadway free from unnecessaJ)' congestion,
m rn@rno Wi ~ I~.!~
FE"" .-, 8 II ! I I '
:- , I I '
U - 'L..
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
//f
LULiAIIUN M~
SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT P .C.D
pea
rON _8~AC.,,! ..'
-'--=:1 L _=-1 ' -.
V~~~,\,
\ "V' ./ ...... , ,/.:' :
.;.,R3...,',.. "
\. /:. -. .~ '
i:
"
"
~ ~
,;.....
" . , /
, .~~
R ~'c;", "'''.
/.
13 '0 1/8 MILES
~~:j . \ \ \ \ \ \ \. .
'~ ,'0 400. 800 FEET ,
'r ' '" . 3-
"rr,<1 ,]( / iT r' ~ .j\,\ j /1 J rtHn':~'
.,
..
MINUTES - PLANNING ANt !VELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA
MARCH 14. 1995
Chainman lehnertz suggested giving the applicant six months to make a good faith
effort. Ms. Heyden pointed out that all that would involve is submitting an
application for a site plan or plat within six months. Mr. Kilday said he could
probably have a submittal of the plat within six months.
Motion
Vice Chainman Dube moved to approve an 18 month retroactive and a 6 month time
extension for zoning/master plan approval and concurrency exemption for the
Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD based on the owner submitting a site plan for
approval within that period of time, subject to staff comments. Mr. Weigle
seconded the motion.
Mr. Golden pointed out that a letter of intent is a pretty vague commitment.
The motion carried 6-1. Mr. Golden cast the dissenting vote.
7. NEW BUSINESS
A. Public Hearing
Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning
Mainstreet Car Wl.sh
Jim Zengage
Forward Progress, Inc.
Between N. E. 1st Street and N. E. 2nd Street, imme-
diately north of Mainstreet Car Wash
Request for a map amendment to the Future land Use
Element of the Comprehensive Plan from Medium Density
Residential to local Retail Commercial and rezoning
from R-2 (Single and Duplex Dwelling District) to C-3
(Community Commercial)
This item was rescheduled until April 11, 1995.
1. Project:
Agent:
Owner:
location:
Description:
B. Subdivisions
Master Plan Modification
1. Project:
Agent:
Owner:
location:
Description:
Shoppes of WOolbright POD
CCl Consultants, Inc.
Howard R. Scharlin, Trustee
Northside of Woolbright Road, east of the l.W.D.D.
E-4 Canal
Request to modify the previously approved master plan
to subdivide outbuilding 3 into .895 acres, revise
the outbuilding sizes (outbuilding 1 from 4,300 to
6,920 square feet, outbuilding 2 from 5,000 square
- 12 -
MINUTES - PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA
MARCH 14. 1995
feet to 5,755 square feet and outbuilding 3 from two
stories and 6,000 square feet to one story and 2,625
square feet), add a driveway on the east side of
S. W. 8th Street, 400 feet north of Woolbright Road,
relocate the existing driveway on S. W. 8th Street,
190 feet to 260 feet north of Woolbright Road and
provide a median cut on S. W. 8th Street for the
relocated driveway.
Ms. Heyden stated that the applicant is requesting approval to modify their pre-
viously approved master plan. The property is 31.99 acres and is approved for
284,620 square feet of commercial retail development. This request is comprised
of six parts.
The first change is subdivision of Tract C to make outbuilding 3 a separate .895
acres outparcel. Tract C is located at the northeast corner of S. W. 8th Street
and Woolbright Road and south of the main entrance into Home Depot.
The second part of the request is a change in the size of outbuilding 3 from a
two-story 4,300 square foot bank to a one-story 2,625 square foot drive-through
fast food restaurant. The issue of the drive-through is being reserved to the
discussion of a conditional use application, which is pending for a Taco Bell
Restaurant.
The next part of the request is a change in the area of outbuilding 2 from 5,000
square feet to 5,755 square feet. They shifted around the square footage of the
outparcel. The overall square footage of the project has not changed.
The fourth change is a change in the building area of outparcel 1 from 4,300 to
6,920 square feet.
The fifth change is relocation of the existing driveway located on the east side
of S. W. 8th Street, 30 feet south, from 290 feet to 260 from the south property
11ne of the PCD.
The last change is the addition of a driveway on the east side of S. W. 8th
Street, approximately 400 feet north of the south property line of the PCD.
This driveway was requested on a previous master plan modification that was
tabled by the City Commission in 1991. '
.
The Shoppes of Woolbright PCD is part of a stipulated settlement agreement
between the Tradewinds Development Corporation and the City that was entered
into on January 24, 1990, which was a revision of an earlier stipulated settle-
ment agreement from November 6, 1986. That stipulated settlement vested the
project for traffic, water and sewer so that no time extensions would be
required prior to build-out of the project.
Ms. Heyden advised that some of the changes are inconsistent with the stipulated
settlement agreement. Those changes will be discussed by the City Commission.
- 13 -
MINUTES - PLANNING AND _~VELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA
MARCH 14. 1995
Since 1991, Mr. Morton, the primary agent for this piece of property, has iden-
tified a punch list of items that are in dispute. The City has been working for
the past three years toward revising the stipulated settlement agreement. Some
of those issues are impacting the current applications that are in the process,
such as the conditional use application for Taco Bell. However, since the
agreement has not been finalized yet by the City C0IIII1ssion, this master plan
modification is being submitted to reduce the punch list.
The subdivision of Tract C is addressed in the agreement and is acceptable.
According to the agreement, platting or a waiver of platting would be required
to subdivide the property.
With regard to relocation of the existing driveway on the east side of S. W. 8th
Street, one entrance, in addition to the main entrance, was allowed pursuant to
the 1990 agreement. This existing driveway is the additional driveway
referenced in the agreement. Therefore, the proposed location of the additional
driveway is closer to the original position, which was centrally located, iden-
tified in the Barton-Aschman traffic report, upon which the traffic conditions
of the 1990 agreement were based.
Mr. Rosenstock left the meeting at 8:52 p.m.
The addition of a second driveway is inconsistent with the agreement.
Furthenmore, there are other reasons that this s~cond driveway is inconsistent.
The intent of PCDs is to encourage a planned program series of operations that
integrate all the buildings as one whole picture (integration of access ways,
infrastructure, streets, landscaping and some kind of unifying element with
respect to architecture). Therefore, this defeats the purpose of requiring
internal access roads and driveways to serve parcels. In addition, the
Barton-Aschman report indicated that the driveway on the east side of S. W. 8th
Street, north of the existing main entrance driveway, was to be deleted. The
proposed master plan still reflects this driveway as being approved.
If the median cut in S. W. 8th Street is approved, this new intersection would
capture much of the traffic anticipated and designed to be received by the main
driveway. The new median cut would encourage the additional driveway being
requested to become a major driveway as well. Therefore, the additional drive-
way that would serve the Taco Bell Restaurant would have to meet the City's 100
foot throat requirement. If the median cut is approved, staff recommends that a
new analysis of the, turning movements be submitted to detenmine the impact the
median cut will have on S. W. 8th Street and Woolbright Road. Also, the Police
Department recommended north and south deceleration lanes along 8th Street to
serve the new driveway. It is also recommended that if any changes approved by
the Commission are different than what is reflected on the proposed master plan,
three copies of a revised master plan be submitted to the Planning and Zoning
Department to reflect those changes.
Vice Chainman Dube noticed that the building on the northwest corner is not the
same shape as the building that was approved last year. Ms. Heyden explained
- 14 -
MINUTES - PLANNING AND 1I0ELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA
MARCH 14. 1995
that she had recommended a master plan modification be submitted to address
splitting that building. The site plan came in before the master plan modifica-
tion. The site plan was approved and expired. Therefore, the master plan was
never changed to reflect the change.
Louis Campanelli. Vice President of CCl Consultants, felt that the median cut
issue and also the major driveway issue should be left up to the attorneys and
the City Engineer. He reminded everyone that the second driveway was approved
by this Board in 1991. The driveway spacings meet the requirements. He
respectfully requested that this application be approved.
Mr. Weigle did not think the property owner should get anything except what is
required by law. Chainman lehnertz agreed. Mr. Golden agreed that the property
owner should not be given anything further than what has been granted in the
settlement. On the other hand, in order to develop this property, he felt that
there are going to have to be some minor modifications to get things to work
right. However, he did not think major changes are appropriate. It appeared to
Mr. Golden that the additional driveway is being driven by the bank being
changed to a fast food restaurant with drive-through.
Chainman Lehnertz inquired about the status of the gas station that was previ-
ously approved. Mr. Campanelli stated that it is presently under design.
Chainman lehnertz referred to the Woolbright Place PUD church parcel and asked
if Mr. Campanelli is aware that the City has ordinances in tenms of the minimum
distance between gas stations and churches. Mr. Campanelli indicated he was not
aware of that.
Vice Chainman Dube pointed out that the gas station was supposed to be built
once the power l.ine was moved, which was about fourteen months ago.
Mr. Campanelli stated that they also had to relocate an abandoned force main,
which was recently done.
With regard to the median cut. the engineer for Taco Bell was present and said
he would be willing to work with Mr. Morton and remove that from the applica-
tion. He is planning to submit the plans so that he can be in front of this
Board at the April meeting. '
Mr. Weigle stated that the area where Taco Bell is proposing to locate was
approved as a bank and he felt it should remain as a bank. He stated that any
site adjustments that the property owner wanted should have been included in the
settlement agreement. He did not feel it was up to the Board to give anything
to the property owner that is not in the settlement agreement.
Mr. Golden noticed that the staff report addresses what was approved under the
master plan for the settlement agreement in tenms of the square footage.
However. it did not reflect all the square footage that was approved under the
settlement agreement. Ms. Heyden stated that the latest approved master plan
- 15 -
MINUTES - PLANNING ANO -~VELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
MARCH 14, 1995
allowed 284,000 square feet, and the settlement agreement allowed 320,000 square
feet. Mr. Golden asked if the Board is obligated in any way to approve any
square footage above and beyond what is reflected on the master plan that was
tied to the agreement. Ms. Heyden could not answer that question. She said the
1990 master plan that was approved was a settlement master plan and showed
315,580 square feet. Both parties agreed that that was the settlement master
plan and that was the square footage they wanted.
Vice Chainman Dube felt Taco Bell would be a nice asset.
The engineer for Taco Bell believed that when Taco Bell submitted an applica-
tion, Michael Haag took it to the City Attorney and that the restaurant was
going to be incorporated into the revised settlement.
Mr. Golden asked what exactly is going on with the conditional use application.
Ms. Heyden advised that Mr. Morton turned in the conditional use application
because he contended that because the 1986 stipulated settlement agreement pro-
hibits fast food restaurants and drive-throughs, but the 1990 agreement is
silent, that the 1990 agreement, supersedes the 1986 agreement. This is not
staff's position. Therefore, since there was some doubt, when the application
came in, it was put on hold, not only because of the drive-through issue, but
because of the issue of subdividing and the new access issues.
It seemed to Mr. Golden that this entire discussion is premature until they work
out exactly what is what between these two versions and come to some consensus.
Motion
Mr. Weigle moved to deny the request to modify the previously approved master
plan. Mr. Golden seconded the motion which carried 5-1. Vice Chainman Dube
cast the dissenting vote.
C. Conststency Review
1. Dental laboratortes as I condittonal use in the C-l, Offtce
Professional, zontng district
Ms. Heyden stated that the City is initiating an amendment to the zoning code to
allow dental laboratories in the C-1 zoning district. Due to the pyramiding of
uses in the zoning district, if approved, this use will be allowed in the C-l,
C-2, C-3, and C-4 zo~1ng districts, subject to conditional use. Currently, den-
tal laboratories are allowed only in the M-l zoning district.
Ms. Heyden stated that this has come about because of a recent denial of an
occupational license request for a laboratory in a mult1tenant building where a
dentistry was located. The original occupational request for that dental
laboratory was based on an interpretation that it was accessory to the den-
tistry. The dental lab wants to move to a different bay within the building.
Since it will no longer be adjacent to the dentistry, it will no longer be
detenmined to be accessory because it will be in and of itself a principal use.
- 16 -
HANDOUT
7.B.1
SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT peD
MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-090
*REVISED MARCH 13, 1995
Chairman and Members
Planning and Develop~t Boarp~ ~ AI.
Tambri J, Heyden ~~z. t~
Planning and Zoning Director /'
Michael E, Haan.~~
Zoning and Site opment Administrator
March 10, 1995
Shoppes of Woolbright PCD - File No, MPMD 95-001
Master plan modification (driveway, median cut and shift
in outparcel sizes and boundaries)
NATURE OF REQUEST
CCL Consultants, Inco{ agent for Howard R. Scharlin, trustee of the
property, is requesting approval to modify the previously approved
master plan for the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD. The 31,99 acre
planned commercial development zoned property, approved for 284,620
square feet of commercial/retail development, is located on the
north side of Woolbright Road and east of the L,W,D.D, E-4 canal,
The proposed changes, described in the attached letter from CCL
Consultants, dated February 14, 1995 (see Exhibit "A") are itemized
below. In addition to the changes stated in the letter of
submittal, a second driveway is requested located on the east side
of S. W. 8th street, approximately 400 feet north of the south
property line of the pcn (see Exhibit IIBII - proposed master plan):
1, Subdivision of Tract C to make outbuilding 3 a separate
,895 acre outparcel, Tract C is located at the
northeast corner of S,W, 8th Street and Woolbright Road
and south of the main entrance into the Horne Depot,
* ')
L. .
Change in the size of the outbuilding 3 from a one-story,
4{300 square foot building to a one-story, 2,625 square
foot drive-through, fast food restaurant. A conditional
use application{ as required by the zoning code, is in
progress for a drive-through{ fast food restaurant as the
use of this outbuilding.
3, Change in the building area of outbuilding 2 from 5,000
square feet to 5{755 square feet.
4. Change in the building area of outparcel 1 from 4,300
square feet to 6,920 square feet.
* 5.
Relocation of the existing driveway located on the east
side of S.W. 8th Street, 30 feet south, from 290 feet to
260 from the south property line of the pcn.
6, Aq,dition of a driveway on the east side of S,W. 8th
street, approximately 400 feet north of the south
property line of the PCD. This driveway was requested
on a previous master plan modification that was tabled by
the city Commission; therefore it has been added to this
request,
BACKGROUND
The Shoppes of Woolbright PCD is part of a November 6{ 1986 and
January 24{ 1990 stipulated settlement agreement between the City
and Tradewinds Development Corporation, The City Commission
ratified the settlement agreement by approving a master plan
modification on May 15, 1990 that depicted the applicable
condi tions of the January 24, 1990 stipulation and settlement
agreement (see Exhibit "C" - master plan pursuant to the 1990
stipulated settlement agreement), The agreement vested the project
for traffic, water and sewer, so that no time extensions for
7.B.1
SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT PCD
MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-090
FROM:
Chairman and Members
Planning and Developemnt Board
Tambri J, HeYden~d~'p c7t~~A,-
Planning and Zoning Director ~
Michael E. Haa;--f)?'l? I!u&
Zoning and Site _ elopment Administrator
March 10, 1995 .
TO:
THRU:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Shoppes of Woolbright PCD - File No, MPMD 95-001
Master plan modification (driveway, median cut and shift
in outparcel sizes and boundaries)
NATURE OF REQUEST
CCL Consultants, Inc" agent for Howard R, Scharlin, trustee of the
property, is requesting approval to modify the previously approved
master plan for the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD, The 31.99 acre
planned commercial development zoned property, approved for 284,620
square feet of commercial/retail development, is located on the
north side of Woolbright Road and east of the L.W.D,D. E-4 canal.
The proposed changes, described in the attached letter from CCL
Consultants, dated February 14, 1995 (see Exhibit IIAII) are itemized
below. In addition to the changes stated in the letter of
submittal, a second driveway is requested located on the east side
of S, W. 8th Street, approximately 400 feet north of the south
property line of the PCD (see Exhibit IIB" - proposed master plan):
1. subdivision of Tract C to make outbuilding 3 a separate
,895 acre outparcel. Tract C is located at the
northeast corner of S.W. 8th Street and Woolbright Road
and south of the main entrance into the Home Depot,
2. Change in the size of the outbuilding 3 from a two-story,
6,000 square foot bank to a one-story, 2,625 square foot
drive-through, fast food restaurant. A conditional use
application, as required by the zoning code, is in
progress for a drive-through, fast food restaurant as the
use of this outbuilding.
3, Change in the building area of outbuilding 2 from 5,000
square feet to 5,755 square feet.
4. Change in the building area of outparcel 1 from 4,300
square feet to 6,920 square feet.
5, Relocation of the existing driveway located on the east
side of S,W. 8th street, 70 feet north, from 190 feet to
260 from the south property line of the PCD,
6. Addition of a driveway on the east side of S.W, 8th
Street, approximately 400 feet north of the south
property line of the PCD, This driveway was requested
on a previous master plan modification that was tabled by
the City Commission; therefore it has been added to this
request,
BACKGROUND
The Shoppes of Woolbright PCD is part of a November 6, 1986 and
January 24, 1990 stipulated settlement agreement between the City
and Tradewinds Development Corporation. The City Commission
ratified the settlement agreement by approving a master plan
modification on May 15, 1990 that depicted the applicable
condi tions of the January 24, 1990 stipulation and settlement
agreement (see Exhibit "C" - master plan pursuant to the 1990
stipulated settlement agreement). The agreement vested the project
for traffic, water and sewer, so that no time extensions for
I
2
To: Planning and Development Board
March 9, 1995
concurrency would ever be required, prior to build-out of the
property. The settlement agreement approved a maximum of 320,000
square feetl to include the uses and layout depicted on Exhibit "C"
- the 1990 settlement master plan. However, the 1990 master plan
reflects only 3151580 square feet.
Since the original settlement agreement, the following master plan
modifications have been submitted for review:
1. october of 1989 request to include the addition of a
building materials store (Home Depot) which included 102,250
square feet of retail and a 19,375 square foot garden center.
The total square footage for the PCD remained unchanged at
315/580 square feet. The City Commission approved this
request on November 211 1989.
2. May of 1991 - request to include the following:
a. Addition of a new driveway onto Woolbright Roadl located
west of S.W. 8th Street;
b. Change in use and size of the outparcel at the northwest
corner of Woolbright Road and S.W. 8th Street from 4/000
square feet of retail commercial to a 1,250 square foot
gas station (this portion of the request was withdrawn by
the applicantl from the submittal);
c. Change in sizel number of stories and designation of use
of the outparcel at the northeast corner of Woolbright
Road and S.W. 8th Street from a 4,300 square foot retail
building to a two-story, 6,000 square foot bank with
drive-through;
d. Addition of another driveway from S.W. 8th Street to the
shopping center outparcels located on the east side of
S.W. 8th street;
e. Relocate southward the approved driveway located on the
east side of S.W. 8th street that leads to the shopping
center outparcels; and
f. Eliminate the north access aisle connection between the
outparcels located on the east side of S.W. 8th street
and the Home Depot site.
The modifications to square footage resulted in a net increase
of 1,700 square feet, thereby increas ing the total square
footage for the PCD from 315/580 to 317,280 square feet
(within the limit allowed by the 1990 settlement agreement).
This request was presented to the Planning and Zoning Board
(now known as the Planning and Development Board) on August
13, 1991. The Board recommended approval of the request 1
with the exception of the additional driveway on Woolbright
Road. The minutes from the August 201 1991 and September 19,
1991 City Commission meetings state that the request was
tabled at the request of the City Attorney because of a
pending motion in the Tradewinds case and that the City
Attorney wished to confer with counsel for Tradewinds on the
issue. A review of City records indicate the request was not
removed from the table.
3. March of 1993 - request to include the addition of 8/745
square feet to the garden center at the home Depot. The
garden center increased from 19,375 square feet to 28/120
square feet. Pursuant to the 1990 settlement agreement, the
square footage of the garden center is not included as part of
J-
3
To: Planning and Development Board
March 91 1995
the retail gross leasable area. The request included
adjusting property lines to accommodate the expansion and the
total square footage of the project remained at 315,580.
On April 20, 1993 the city commission approved the 8/745
square foot expansion subject to staff comments, and on August
10, 1993 the Planning and Development board approved a waiver
of platting for the adjusted property lines in connection with
the expansion.
4. March of 1993 - request to include the following:
a. Subdivision of Tract B to create a .957 acre outparcel.
Tract B is that portion of the PCD that is located on the
west side of S.W. 8th Street;
b. Change in use and size of the outparcel at the northwest
corner of Woolbright Road and S.W. 8th Street from 4,000
square feet of retail commercial to a 3,040 square foot
gas station (resurrection of the portion of the 1991
request that was withdrawn by the applicant);
c. Add two new driveways into the proposed service station
outparcel - one on S. W. 8th street and the other on
Woolbright Road;
d. Allow a canopy over the gasoline pumps to encroach the
setbacks due to a difference in the service station
regulations in effect in 1986 vs. the service station
regulations in effect in 1993; and
e. Reduce the building square footage specified on the
master plan for Tract B from 62,000 to 55/040 square
feet.
with this requestl the total square footage of the PCD
decreased 6/960 square feet from 315/580 to 308,620. On April
20, 1993 the City Commission approved the request, subject to
staff comments. As a result of the traffic evaluation of the
proposed service station use, the square footage on Tract B
decreased 24,000 square feet from a total of 55/040 square
feet (52,000 commercial/retail plus 3,040 convenience
store/gasol ine sales) to 31/040 square feet (28/000
commercial/retail plus 3,040 convenience store/gasoline
sales) . Therefore, the total square footage of the PCD
decreased 24,000 square feet from 308/620 to 284,620 square
feet.
ANALYSIS
Changes in Planned Commercial Development (PCD) master plans are
reviewed consistent with" Section 6.F.13.b. of Appendix A - Zoning
as follows:
b. "Modifications to approved plans which result in an
increase of less than ten (10) per cent in measurable
impacts as determined by including any changes in traffic
generated, water consumed or sewage to be collected will
require review and recommendation the planning and zoning
board and final approval by the city commission. The
city commission decision to approve, approve with
modifications or deny, shall be predicated upon a finding
of consistency with the comprehensive plan and a finding
that any such increase will not result in a negative
impact on infrastructure delivery systems or the
surrounding area in general. It is the intent of this
3
4
To: Planning and Development Board
March 9, 1995
section that all additional impacts be mitigated. .."
Based on the documentation provided, the changes to the three
outparcels would generate in excess of a ten (10) per cent increase
in water consumed and sewage collected, if the approved outparcels
are evaluated against the proposed outparcels. An increase of only
2.8% in water consumed and sewage collected results if the proposed
outparcels are evaluated against the entire PCD water and sewer
impacts. In either scenario, the utility Department does not have
an objection to the analysis provided and has not indicated that
the increase will have a negative impact on the infrastruture
delivery systems. A slight increase in pervious area will result
in a minimall positive impact on the PCD drainage.
with respect to traffic, the traffic information submitted
indicates that the traffic generated by the three outparcels will
generate less than a ten (10) percent change. This information
has been forwarded to Palm Beach County. The results of the review
by the County have not been received at the time of this report.
The following is an evaluation of each of the proposed changes
listed on page one of this report:
1. subdivision of Tract C to make outbuilding 3 a separate
outparcel and the redistribution of square footage among the
outparcels As indicated in the stipulation settlement
agreement, this is acceptable. Platting or a waiver of
platting (at the determination of the City Engineer) to
subdivide this parcel is required. As required, outparcels
shall be self-sufficient with respect to lot size, setbacks,
parking and other PCD zoning district requirements.
2. Relocation of the existing driveway on the east side of S.W.
8th street, south of the main entrance into the shopping
center (Home Depot) - One entrance, in addition to the main
entrance, was allowed pursuant to the 1990 settlement
agreement. This existing driveway is the additional driveway
referenced in the agreement. The proposed location of this
additional driveway is closer to the original position
(centrally located) identified in the Barton-Aschman traffic
reportl upon which the traffic conditions of the 1990
settlement agreement were based.
3. Addition of a second driveway on the east side of S.W. 8th
street, between Woolbright Road and the main entrance to the
shopping center (Home Depot) - As mentioned in previous item
#2, the number of driveways is specifically limited in the
1990 settlement agreement. The addition of a second driveway
is inconsistent with the 1990 settlement agreement. Since the
Barton-Aschman report does not require an additional driveway
to be added, it could be argued that this driveway is not
needed and that safety and level of service are not impaired
without it.
Furthermore I this type of access design is contrary to the
intent and purpose of a PCD, which is to provide for a planned
(not piece-meal), programmed series of development operations,
designed as a whole through integration of principle buildings
and outbuildings that are linked via common use of access and
infrastructure and similar architecture and other aesthetic
elements. Specifically with respect to access, this
additional driveway defeats the purpose of requiring internal
access roads and driveways to serve parcels within a planned
development.
It should also be noted that the Barton-Aschman report stated
4
5
To: Planning and Development Board
March 9, 1995
that the driveway on the east side of S.W. 8th street located
north of the existing main entrance driveway was to be
deleted. The proposed master plan still reflects this
driveway as being approved.
4. Median cut in S. W. 8th street If approved I this new
intersection would capture much of the traffic anticipated and
designed to be received by the main driveway that is located
at the entrance to Home Depot. The main driveway is centrally
located for the major portion of the retail uses located on
the east side of S.W. 8th street. Since the Barton-Aschman
report did not recommend a median cutl it could be argued that
the proposed median cut is not consistent with the traffic
report referenced in the 1990 settlement agreement and
therefore not needed or possibly affecting level of service.
Therefore I if the median cut is approved, it is recommended
that a new analysis of the turning movements be submitted to
determine the impact the median cut will have on S. W. 8th
street and Woolbright Road.
Alsol the proposed median cut would cause the east driveway
into the site to become a major driveway which requires a one
hundred (100) foot throat; the distance from the property line
to a parking space or an access aisle. This would
significantly impact the parking design of outbuilding 3.
CONCLUSION
This request was reviewed by the Technical Review Committee (TRC)
on February 28, 1995 and the committee raised no objections at the
time. However I the committee did not have technical data regarding
the impact the median cut and additional driveway would have on the
surrounding roadways or the project itself. If this driveway and
median cut are approved by the Commission, the Police Department
recommends that north and south deceleration lanes be required at
the cut to avoid congestion from motorists slowing down to make
turns at this location ( see Exhibit "D" Police Department
Memorandum No. 95-0121). It is also recommended that if any
changes are approved by the Commission that are not reflected I or
are contrary tOI the proposed master planl that three copies of a
revised master plan be submitted to the Planning and Zoning
Department I prior to submittal of any future PCD requests. The
Planning and Zoning Department is not making a specific
recommendation on this request since components of the request are
inconsistent with the latest settlement agreement. Deviation from
this agreement are viewed as policy decisions of the Commission.
tjh
Attachments
xc: Central File
A:WooIPCD
6'
f,Xl:l1.B1.'f A.
~
. ~
CCl CONSULTANTS, INC.
Consulting Engineers m
Surveyors
Pmnne~ ~
2200 PARK CENTRAL BLVD., N, SUITE 100, POMPANO BEACH, FL 33064, (305) 974-2200. FAX (305) 973-2686
February 14, 1995
Hand Delivery
Ms. Tambri Heyden
Planning Director
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Re: SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT PCD
Boynt;on Beach, Florida
CCL Project; No. 3~O~
Dear Ms. Heyden:
Enclosed herewith please find the following:
1. Twelve (12) signed and sealed prints of the revised master
plan for the above-referenced project.
2. A check made payable to the City of Boynton Beach in the
amount of $500.00.
3. Letter of Authorization form owner for CCL Consultants, Inc.
to act as agent for this matter.
Please be advised that we are herein submitting for master plan
amendment for the above-referenced project. We are proposing to
amend the existing master plan as follows:
A. Outparcel 1 will be revised from 4300 SF to 6920 SF.
B. Outparcel 2 will be revised from 5000 SF to 5755 SF.
C. Outparcel 3 will be revised from a 2-story 6000 SF bank to a
1-story 2625 SF Taco Bell Fast Food Restaurant with a drive-
thru lane.
D. The locations of the driveways for these outparcels onto S.W.
8th Street will be revised from what is presently shown on the
existing master plan. In addition, we are proposing a median
cut in the S.W. 8th Street median which aligns with one of the
proposed relocated driveways as well as prior-approved
driveway location on the west side of S.W. 8th Street.
'7
.....
-,'
Ms. Tambri Heyden
CCL Project No. 3101
February 14, 1995
Page two
We respectfully request that this proposed master plan amendment be
placed on the next Technical Review Committee agenda and thusly on
the next available Planning & Development Board as well as city
Commissioh A~anda.
Should you have any questions or need any additional information,
please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
panile, Jr., P.E., P.L.S.
ject Manager
LRC/kag
Enclosure
cc: Mike Morton, Tradewinds Group
Eduardo Carcache, P.E., CKE Group, Inc.
ill
~,~,,~ ~W ~ InI
',I) I, . l~ I
1
~~iNG AND \
zmJJrl~'..!lf.E.L_.....__.. ,;
1_,.
CCL CONSULTANTS, INC.
~
?
f,Xl:l1.B1.'f B
Cf
..:;:!! .... -t C
.0"'.'- ~~~ >: m
........0
.~....JII!: ::e~ <
.'Vi'" .....z! m
T/!!c. .....-tz 5
:Cl:~ wO~1D
~=~g .....z en "tI
::;!!"'2 i:
~~- 0"< m
..%'"!i :DOm
;!!~= ~~r; ~ Z
....
~r' I w..1:
mOl ....
I:I....~ :s; m
..om ~","'4
~;! ;.t2 ~
.. .'" 3:
z 3
z
m '"
'" ~
6
z
-1I....n .~Ilo)cn
~g~~ !:3:g~
=:~ia ;"'4oj!
tJEm
't!jcnb !.~I~
;:0......
~~z J ~ :~t~
."r:r ~o.. -
rJ:m e~
omm !H:t
Sa; . ....
."mz
:",1 rmoO
0-4(11-
w.... .. I
...e 6 m
w"'" .. z
Z~3 w "
w Z
."0 . ,.
..0" !:: ,.
'"", ~
e
:;
,.
" ~
"
..
::!:::~ -;::..."0
1:,.""
i~~ "",,fAo:a
ii-4Jlo~
~, W-a c~
w.clo..cn
~~I 1~-4%
"'I:::a:s.
~11I!:::s!
-l! "'m"'~
.;0
;lIm nz.
E~~ ~~~
.,,<...
~N~ ...",.
oZ",
gm a~:V
.cn~
wO.
;l ~~~
":r,,
.. -",..
~ e...
:;n
I ,.0 .J
~i
",,,, r
,.
...
-"QNO
:;pp ,~
.. "
.. jlln
~i5~~
"HI
g~h
;:'J~'
::: ~~
:d
g~
n
0
~
0
..
0
en
n
II>
Cil
....
I'
0)
~
Scale: 1" . 10'
D.te: ~J711/.n
Drawn By. aAP
File No.1205 1 XR .21,1
OA'oMng No, 85-34
5_.--1--01
91..~"\~
, ~
~,,,'_"L""'. t'''~.';.~:~~~ .
~. ~I'OS i" -----~~
1''''' -- ~nt
~ k <~g~
( \ --~ ~""
~ "" I'. ""\00... "I".E _ . . ====--- \..)>- ----- : "- .
,1\,_ { .. .I/-+---::..::..=-- ';F~-'" ... ..-,_ ~~.. ~ n_ .^
i~: -.-.g~-=-~ ~-O -).. ~,
" ;!It\I ~!~ '~~A ~I! 'I ~:- j :11 ~~rJ....~ 0 ,;~= : ~~,
1 ' I, I ~ ~- .:-':- --" - I y/..--__~.=.z4'J,i
\ _ fl _ ;:d n_ " - I / -- /
I \ :J\ -\--- ._-_":'l-~. "",,,,' ',' : /y/' ..--~'
'~ '. \ n \'Tr- ~;IU~ \ ,~ f V /' ;/"'"", .---:/'
:' \ ~~.I.' I~ ir~r i~-~:hr'~: ~ ~\ j;--,j(f '~. \- ,- A'
II , I> II ~ ~ ~ ~ '- .Af ,'If 'C. --- ' :...-~
_,] _~"II ~ I ~ ~\) ~I.:. i ~ \ ~I~ i / . = ;.: i' "-
: "\, .. , \ \{ = l-V V""\. - . ~ i
..:; :"'~II,ill,i 'i \~ ,\",," "~"l;" "~=":}~~ ~ (~i'
I I _ \ -,' I, 'L-_ .:.1.---1 ::,\1
'.~il<'-il """'1' ~ '_"_ I~~' " j/(hj :-.~ T~~lll n
I - c.."::: -.-\ - = ~f i ' I -, ~~'\ ,! 1:\ I ~i j
~ I I ---.; '. c~_.."".._""..""llO.' .JOWlO I, k ~ "" i '\ \1 (.\\\ I g ~ I
,.,.i ~ ' ~ ~ c~ t: If'-" L\ ! d' ~f' : ill
~~'I '~ ~,~ III , \ II ~ \ I f\' : ~ I, "I' 1\ ' I II t ..~
I : :%I Z'" \ ~ ~ I ~ I -'1 I !,r I
~ IV Z I 1 I Jill "1 IJ; \ i
!i II I ~..~~... _ Ii \ ,c+, \ LJ
_ ~-"- \ .../}...lJ..--... \,,1-- \
o \
if:<: \ ....._....._~, \;-"f! r
j L I I " ~
~ I~. ~~ , .... = ~
--.::;' +=- .. ~--'- ~! '" ;;~~ z
so.,.~"'.. ;11: t ~: __ ~ __ - -.-J , -- - / 5~.V':''''''VE' 0 ~, ~~~ rTJ ~ ~
.. L~ 5013_1629000 I ;gl'!-:-i . ._~-~ )<.~ - H--= ~
!___~_ __ :Il!i~ __~g.,. -=.-: _ - ,'_-=- Z
-------~-'W;ST~IN_;;eCT.ON_;.----~ 0 ~~~~ ~ SQtH16'E sn91 51 ~
~ ~~~~ :t :~
~ :5~~~ S.C~~o,~t!~ROAD ~~
~ C::lll~ ...m
~ ~o~ ~~
~ f ~ ~;
~ n ':' ~
o ; _
-'I \
",'
"IJ. \
II>
o
c;j
o
I
~
II"
, I
I
.'
J;
.
~
~
---- Cp-"t-\-
~
.
%
.
z
o
,,-
~ \.,
II
"
"
"J,..; >,1
! II ~_ '
! 1\1 i
~ :
: '
I
I
t
~
!
m
m
"
"
In
[II
109
.11
I ! lit
[U
~ ~ t~~
I ~ ~ ~ii
I Hi
I II!'
I I'~
:
~z~~~~~
=ti1i5~ e:a
=;:5~~~~
~~!:(~~;rn
6E~t.~~g
cno"S;;c -4r
!i6z~cn.c;rn
!~~ecni~
~~~~~C)i
~$i~~~~
"tI~~~~~Z
~U) mom~
~~8~!!~~
Cl)JIo%::aZZ21
m....Sl-mm-4
~:S~~~,;
"IX2.0!,~~
~nl~:;~:~
~2=Z~~~
~~~g;~:
zocE)zo-<
:-,z02JO"lc
2zo:e-cz
~c:c:-x<
g&m~:~
CI)~d!i=icn
.~ zm~
::aU) On
m: ::a~
.%
~;ll;!;O
. ",a....
.. ~ m
~i:en
..lilt 0
ft ~ _
-. .
:S: I
s- ft
;~-B
..,!!.-
'. 0-
~c c::.
i;. ~
<,"' .
...0
-~. ~
iii
o
1:"
- .
, .
3-<
~ ~
::.
-.
~ S
~~
. .
" ..
. ~
" ~
i ~
~ '"
;... t
" '"
!"
r-
~
Z
C
c
en
m
OJ
'" ::D
.. m
~ :a.
'""
~.8
.. :e
u: Z
1\
" ,. i: " "
,. .. m ,.
;~ " '" '"
m < "
'" 0 i
<
Ii 6 e "
e III ...
.. .. ..
.. '" 0
m <
~ :II ,. 6
m
.. ,.
a
c;;~ .. oO oO en
... 0 0
..", 8 oO ... =i
,," .. ..
g~ '" ... ... m
.. ." ...
g~ .. ... 0 C
m 0 oO !i
0
IIlD !: .. ..
:!!s ... .. ~
.. ..
:II 0 '" ..
,. oO ,.
0 .. .. '.
'" n
,. 0
.. II:
:z> II:
~ m
'"
0 n
):
...
ii
,.
oO
..
F
~ " ~ '"
'" " .. io
~ ~ ..
~ ..
'" ..
... '"
~ III ~
,. ."
'"
m!, 'l','13"!HH!!!W" Illtl ... 0
i;Fjl ii).~J::~~:i-h:!~:' i::~; iil ~
I J .,R~l!'-i.~!l ~!1! t:a
-I :: e~~.I; r =1:'. =1 I. :;
~ !: h . r~. ;}~ .I~ ~
r.' u r. _-0
1 :i :~ :l~! i: ~
t d t. =-:, ~r
r :.; ~, i~~l 'i
, j! il to ~~ ,;
i '!' iI" '[
I H ~ H~; h
i H ~i iiH jJ
i i' : liii il
. ~ :; aitr
"a C) 0 II
~ ~ ~ ~
a ~ ~ 2
~ ~ ~
l;omn..
"'~~i:
j ~.
~I
~I~
!" ~
lIllA
o ~ CoO SA
efti 11
;1::: ~ ~
:\~ 1; ~
ol~ ~ .. ~
~I;i:; ..
" " a: " ..
'" " '" '"
;;; p '" ~ ..
0 # <II
.. ...
." ~
m
..
SHOPPES OF WOOLBR~~
.rO~'~N BEACH, FLORIDA "'~r:CJ:(:::;
MASTER PLAN' 'I ~ -
PROPOSED
/D
8
~i
~:II E)
~Q:!j
~: "II
:II'"
nl;
l!!m
"II
C
?
z
c
c:
!!l
:II
~
li
o
m
Ul
Ul
:II
o
)>
c
."
I ~
~:D~
-< m aJ
... Ul :Il
,. - i5
~lih
.. z....
0-1"11
-< ); r-
a r- l=;
z m
: :a
E !=
,. C
0> '
n
~o
:t-
g~
o>n
.,,-
~
80' A.OW
[:1;
I!
~
-,
I~
!i
~~
}!
II
!~
"'r""
Plo
",0
"'~
~6
zZ
~==
"'~
:Il ."tI
z
l;l
..
Co>
m
t,tl
rlt .
.,
:
~?
Kilday It Associates
Landscape Architects/Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, F\o,ida 33401
(305) 689,5522
/ ,
k~1~-/
E X H I BIT C
1/
_~_'" _.....~ c . _~' +~'~~ ~~' -. ~ '- -_.--~.. s" .,... '
,,_.:...:;: :8:'~ m.-' , "<"l<"'~ .' - ~~ ,.~'. .. .~.,...~",J. ~-"U\iiil ,,~....~~{.ti:~"" .~,,--
l:"'''.d.=''~''::!'''~'''<"'''''''''''''''''''~'''''''''~. - . ~. ..,' ~.- -..., ,...' . ,'" ...... ~ ,".;!i- . ~
:...ioc i.. '; m . . c' ",,;.::D:%: ~, ~ : .. C .- <' 'I:'~~-'
T"c. !;...z.... ~ ""'m... .---J t;"M' ~ - . '
::~!I:~ ~g~lil 0 .. ----r~c~ II On~tJ''''' _ . '1 .
t:::l~& e~,.g ~ i ,ff: ~~= ,] \,.:-&".,\ ~ f "1' , '
Jl;lS ~8~' ~ ~' ,tm ~ i'l'~ k .OlO'" /' f_
Olm ....0 ~ ,.~ /.~7 ~~
;!!5i'(' ..P... -I. jll~i#f .... ...-:j!:;'~
i;;1!!! :::~~ -I ~ L~;~p 0 ~.o"'~ .,:11;'.
~g_;;: ~~~ m :II NOOl!~E' ~F~~~ .
.... _ n )> ".., ,: . 1,/ r
~ :g 3: ~~. .. r -M 1ft
i a .. ~ ~ ~.'
m.. ;: o!l= tjlI
"g i\; ~ If __~ ' li
Z ...'\> -.. ~ :ll -
J
..~n ~a
g~~ ~& ~
.~~ ~-
~~~ z 1 .
i~~ ~;
....~~
b~:
s~~
:.,,1
~~:g
~~~
wO-<
..~o
;C:zJ
"'
C
::;
m
o
o
~
~.....
mom
enO"
......~
..c.
.. ...,en
....%
1:....
..!:!
m....
~;:o
::Z'"I:-
. )IoF
......
..mm
oz"
~~:a
~",:-,
wOI
wc,...
~:2m
-....
c""
~g
=i
0"'
m
,...
CJl
C'l
Ql
i\i
'"'
I
CD
q
..J:
~~
~;~
z 5i
~ ;~
:3' ram
, ~ i
z m
" z
n; :
~~ 0
m... I:
p~ e
~; ;
N::! ;JI
~
z
/
1:i:'
~40 ~
c"--
Scale; l' . 80'
Date: 3/28190
Drawn By: DAP
File No. 42.,,,
Drawing No.8 5-34
Sheel~of 2'
I~ :i'- ~ ;r '-.~! 'i?
~'~\~ Jr' I ~ ~\ 1\
.' i I 1\ \,
,. ~ :.. &1.-J?lt i If' ._ II ~ II
" , , 'I I ~ ~
\1 1 ~\ IF II ~ \ If
1" '''. \ I
I~
'I
~ ::;.1
;;
o ~ ~
> "
~ ~ ~
~ ...z~ It
~~~: ~I
g~i~ ~I
a~~~
~~)o
~~
~
i
'~
," .
\ ~ ~,
, 0 ~
~.
i -
" "
=4 :.:4
.. -<
n"
g g
z z
n n
;= ;:
Ii Ii
II
.. ell
ram
~~
Ii.
.~.~
n~lil: !Iil
.. ""2:i!!i. .!oJ.
.. eIIi~;;;:;
Ill.... .. i
.... rf
.. ~~ It".'
-t;!i.,;I~ ;;-
:i!!!d~g~ It i
. "~bl:' i .I'
iS~ECl~:, ~tl
C!loo;;:!!Illi!! _&
~~l!IU~ .~11
o. :l!;Gilii "'~
i~i6~~1 ~!--
~1II.fD~l;:i ~:
6SlDZ~!;\" M
"'DF.n F~ 10..
E:n"'O:'" .
~o{!J6zo~ . ::
:4~o:llla""c: s..
=<z"~:i!iS :: 11
~i:;;!:a i ~
"'!lJ<p!t=l'" cr;
.. . zml= a.
iI~ ~ i
~ z
i III it ! ! ~ ~
S ~ .. 31 gill ill 8 ~ g
5 ~ >> 9 ~D t ~ ~ ~
! iI ~ 6 -i ~ )0 m :I>
~ S b.-t~~
.. ..
" n
m 0
.. I:
" I:
!; !Il
. 0 Q
..
t:
..
a
- N ~ W
~ N ... ~
~. , t ...=
Ih ::.
~
I: ~ Ii
I
... ,
% I
;;m J
~5 !
~ "';I: ~
Om ,"
~~I
"fJ1
0
I
IIHi
m I!! ~ 5
... '" rn "r
!:l .. m
~ . tD
~ .... w _ w XI
"ClIM~Om
. oM..:o" ~
C=:::"
N "-.,. s: 0 8
.. 'II .'-' \
'4~:~ ~
~N=. CZ
..::...~w
:~ ~ ~ ~ ,~
... "
n ..
9 ~
.
o .. N III
::"il'
sOi :>7\1;; ~
'i>1'.SI
N-
w.
, ..
w.
~..
~
"'
..
j i
, ,
I~
Kilday & Associates
Landscape Architects/Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(305) 689,5522
z
2
!!l
:a
~
11
o
III
en
:a
o
)lo
c
~i ~
~r- :IS ,..
~-Cm (II
~~!:!! ~
ColI'" C C)
_n!. m %.
~.. Z -1
'0 -I "tt
.!~ j; ...
~a r ~
z m
''"
.. :v
S s=
"' c
.. .
.::;;. ,.:.; ,oJ', ,;. SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT
~ P.C.O.
-: .... ' . BOVNTON BE~H, FLORIDA
... '.' MASTER PLAN 1 '1 '
.1
[:'
.=
)
. ~ ~
~ :;
" .
i~
!~
. ~
~~
,~
~
"
~
m
z
<
6
~
~~
~)
~~
Z:;
;a
CIl ,
:It ,~
Z
Gl
..
, w
m
f,Xl:l1.B1.'f D
/3
BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Office of Professional Standards
To:
From:
Date:
Re:
Tambri Heyden, Directo~
Lt. James Cummings ~
28 February 1995
Shoppes of Woolbright, P.C.D.
TRC Memo # 95-0121
The comments that I have regarding this project concern S.W. 8 Street, and the curb cuts made
north of the entrance at Woolbright. Although I have no problems with the curb cuts themselves,
I would like to see deceleration lanes placed at the sights of these cuts, in order to facilitate
motorists, and to keep the roadway free from unnecessary congestion.
00 rn @ ~ ~ W ~ i~l;
FE...... ., 8 ! Iii i i
.- , II .
U .;.. . l-
I
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
/1
LGCAT\ON MAf
HOPPES OF WOOLBR\GHT P .C.O.
\ li\ U - ~-j\~~
,_,-=-l'~,
->~ ~
F' ~~
Er:=
c ~ ~\\\\\'
11t..', ;J~,..t1' ~~ ~LIDlli1,L
l e,T\' 'l-\
~,.. . \ 1
~L .~-,~t.
\ ,,' t
\ ' ;..~
~~
~~\
Iw ~~\\r~l
~ \\Tl~\
\~\ \~
\ \ :\_l \J.
\ \ ' \ . \ (\
'I"!I\
r T.l \ to.
,
~'
...-
~l[\lll.'\'''''' "l't~~C-"-'~"" , ,~."r.."""\\"
ffisl~1J !<'~~."~""~~'~'~:lf 2 ~':J\ 'n
,Krt T 'I~! r' ' 1"1>-', -;::: \
-1 U ,/ I i ,,,-TT T 1/<:\ ~ ~ H - \
[.:11 t-' _ ,:l <=' .,,; /.:) ""'2 ': ~ n- \
\. :u~; ~~~~,. ..-- '9.....
" ' ',~ :Jill!:: /' T l". \I.,
pCO ,~ ~~ T ,\. ,'" ." ,...
7'aN _ ,J9Y"oj; .,,\h ~"',' 1 " :m.
.~ ,::J L _"'1, ",\'1"C~- - ,1 ' · ""'
...J F~~':::r::-- '-1, ,cf ' c:.." \ \ \ 1\ \11 \I \ IT (,lIT1? .l <' au
"$" 7" ' ,./", \, 11 \I n\ \ \ 111 1'1 \ \ {'1 ,,", \
J,1=\::3'"u" ',,' '-- 1 1\ lmTI~U~ff1~b ~\ I
", P' 1 ~,~~ 1 '1~\1.~""1 .,; . .- WI
\\ \~ \\\ \" 't . ~\,.. . ,.., ij.~i'/\ \ II m ~ IL-
. ',' , ',,;\fu ~'" ~T' -11 ' Y;yj!f" '\ill!! ~
\f" L L"""""" <1 ~:.~~ ~ \~ rl \ 0 mmm e '~f",,~~111 '
'11 " q, ~}i'1 \111 1"\ \ \ 'i3: ~w ,1"-<-" rn 'Ul.l.'1.l ":!.(\\tlT '
"" -'-' \ ~_ '\1 '
\:: .. fj ,_," ..wn". r. :fI.1 'Ill
< >~. t:t ' \P--: ... ;"m rI rTI'
,,' "j , L ' ~.,-r \ ",.-r,'1," " 'C
=4 .t c ~"'.:";:: '::-.~,' ,~. I '1 ' " u
;-. l. ':'., ~;;.:rr~ ' " "'~ \_ ~'> L-'
/.. _"'''''' Ii'" " h.'\'
. I R~ ~I' \,,\ \ \It...
~ ~ \,,\\
"~MJ~~>~~~ '~~(!~TL..t \~-?[\ f'\J\J\:~o \-
\\~al · . ,..' ,<.,;.." ,\-
.:.. I \' , )/~ ,"'":'"....,',' '." ". 'J" \ \
'1 It" " . /:j:lfJ;:,,' .,,'...., ,,::,' . " \6I~Io\.- aP\G t-4"f '
~ ~l"'~:; ~ ',' '" . \ ,,\.-P<CEtI \
~~.~/~:1i't""~;' '-, ',~ \ \\i'v6o= 1YY/
,-' l/./ ,,':: '" ',\\~'" ,,', ~
/ . ," ' ,," \.\\ 1
~)/ Z 1,\' . ," 1;' "~'~:\ ,- \~ \ '( ; \ ~;5IS6' ~..
<:." \ \, W \ 'il In~ \ ~i II...'; '<<5 ~ v
~, .-'- '; _;"\11 ~ ~':-' . \I~'l'Tl\ 8 ~ \I) ~ x Cl (:<
(~ '. ~1J:-,:;: , S \Te. ~y, IJJ
\ "Fe''''''' " _,~ ~' L~~ ,~,~~'
.:' "." 1., ,.,' ~~'';;.-- :,
, p:3 . l' ,,:::/--C~', C3 i 'I
,s W ,5" ".","' I .,,'8R,"d '1"X::S>> , ' :
I '\ I '" 1 HI'!,1I"'! ' '- ;
\.. T ' ' t r, - '.,1- ' l/)j7/_ ..;.
...-",_'\ ......... j!. .,...::IT{:/~ r-'~ .' '
. ,," !y .Lj , >- 'I '
_, -' ~ "-1<-1 w " " " iJ: I
r- _ ~';'N-< \- ,.' \J ,I ~
, . 'Ff eft '.....-- ' I I ~....,
~.' " y<,.x'J~,)-I~~-" -.I L '~t '/-'
. :(^X"""'.., .'" [ , ' ~: a1 '
\11\ ""~"T~' ClEC,~~>~,,':jtt:: ~ ,;J\O : -@--il-:---
., :) _ ~ \1\ \ _\\(~_~~ -y:ds;t;i'::: ~. " -- ! E J ,/ .P'~o
,"'~ ' ~ ^ 1'Vl x~ ' - l- -, jAr/ .~
~ ,,^ :>9X" - ~,' ·
, I.'~. . -: ~~....' \-"i-.~. if, J~
\_~ 3;" i ITT ~~~ ~.:?'N"'fi ~;I \ II \ c::.~ " /: 1 !/jl ~,~L.
'-'- K.,'''l "" -...c "'^" v L Y v~,,,, (!-----"'/J i.--' ~
\-t' ~ I'J::HICl "'- y " ., --:
w c, ,f-<fI"IC:P"'~'" ')-):' 'V " TIT '" v " !t-
. _ H "1=1' 1f-4:U' 'Y~ y~'. . ' Go!<"
\]~. rl' '1( ~ ~ ~ 'Y ~.(,..,:.,. n~''''': L~ ':::: ", -' v' ....... P ~'1! II 7 ~ ,," '" 1;" \:lI J
.1.0 " Jc- _ .~ ....J (III /fK"rD ";.':- u...1'1
, . '~ .:: I'" 1/1 11 \ \ \ OJ ~-
_ V I '\ \1 1 "1 A ,/11' 1\ \ (\) 1--:' /I
13 '0 ~/8 MILES ' 1 1 1-' : : (I. ,,' ,CD --'t:: L
-::::: . . \ \ ,-.-"'lIl' 1 \ \ J : a1: 1/ '\ '\ I (I' - ,J-I
~ \\\\\ \ . I;:;>~": _ : l' "-c+,P-' \. ~ 7
..", 1 II ' is ' .~-'" ,.,
&~ 't'\ 400, 800 F~E.' ,~: .' _ '\~ ~j! : ,ci I ~~ p ',j .:::: ,.L '.: .j;:" cj~
m,A"""" r. _0" 3 ,.. '\"f).:t:. '; il{ E ,: i1l" ,,', ~\., \. ..:=
, " tn~ t rtiL-"ll,l: ~;;f I Ii C, ~ ll~ .\-
>-
"I '"
l:l.,I \ \
~ .. ,. l tL.L ' ".
it (!,'t r ,~\
~ ,~\~\.
~ _ 'L.-1'"
, ~ ~~~I":\\
~~\N<\\in\l
~ ~\~W~m
~~ tW\\\\
l~ \, ~\\,\W,\I
.fTf\\\J\ Ti \ W,; ,~\~i
\~' \1
~\ ",
~
\ \ .
_.c-_;~AlI
I r[__,c,
o
~~r:,;
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-090
TO: Chairman and Members
Planning and Developemnt Board
THRU: Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Michael E. Haag
Zoning and Site Development Administrator
DATE: March 101 1995
SUBJECT: Shoppes of Woolbright PCD - File No. MPMD 95-001
Master plan modification (driveway, median cut and shift
in outparcel sizes and boundaries)
NATURE OF REQUEST
,\
~ ~ 0
j'1V
Jf\ ,,\
\ ,8
W'
t
CCL Consultants, Inc., agent for Howard R. Scharlinl trustee of the ~
property, is requesting approval to modify the previously approved ~B~~~
master plan for the Shoppes of Woolbright peD. The 31.99 acre ) 0
planned commercial development zoned property I approved for 20G I 320~
square feet of comme~cial/retail development, is located on the
$":< north s ide of Woolbright Road and east of the L. W. D. D. E-4 canal.
~~ \\,/' The proposed changes, described in the attached letter from CCL
" ~ - Consultantsl dated February 14/ 1995 (see Exhibit "A") are itemized
~ \).. _ t-~\
r ,- below. In addition to the changes stated in the letter of
~~ submittal I a second driveway is requested located on the east side
of S. W. 8th s,treet, approximately 400 feet north of the south
property line of the PCD (see Exhibit "B" - proposed master plan) :
........
1.
Subdivision of Tract C to make outbuilding 3 a separate
.895 acre outparcel. Tract C is located at the
northeast corner of S.W. 8th Street and Woolbright Road
and south of the main entrance into the Home Depot.
2. Change in the size of the outbuilding 3 from a two-story,
6,000 square foot bank to a one-storYI 2,625 square foot
drive-through, fast food restaurant. A conditional use
application I as required by the zoning code I is in
progress for a drive-through I fast food restaurant as the
use of this outbuilding.
3. Change in the building area of outbuilding 2 from 5,000
square feet to 5/755 square feet.
4. Change in the building area of outparcel 1 from 4,300
square feet to 6/920 square feet.
5. Relocation of the existing driveway located on the east
side of S.W. 8th streetl 70 feet north, from 190 feet to
260 from the south property line of the PCD.
6. Addition of a driveway on the east side of s. W. 8th
Street, approximately 400 feet north of the south
property line of the PCD. This driveway was requested
on a previous master plan modification that was tabled by
the City Commission; therefore it has been added to this
request.
BACKGROUND
The Shoppes of Woolbright PCD is part of a November 6, 1986 and
January 241 1990 stipulated settlement agreement between the city
and Tradewinds Development Corporation. The City Commission
ratified the settlement agreement by approving a master plan
modification on May 151 1990 that depicted the applicable
"r)' f'" condi tions of the January ,24, 1990 stipulation and settlement
v, t~''''l>rI- ag:-eement ( see Exhibit "C"~ - raster plan pursuant to the ~990
; T'" ~IJ st1pulated settlement agreement" The agreement vested the pro] ect
~~ ~r for trafficI water and sewer, so that no time extensions for
,f"
f' '
TO: Planning and Development Board
-2-
March 9, 1995
concurrency would ever be requiredl prior to build-out of the
property. The settlement agreement approved a maximum of 3201000
square feetl to include the uses and layout depicted on Exhibit "C"
- the 1990 settlement master plan. Howeverl the 1990 master plan
reflects only 315,580 square feet.
Since the original settlement agreement, the following master plan
modifications have been submitted for review:
1. October of 1989 request to include the addition of a
building materials store (Home Depot) whioh included 102/250
square feet of retail and a 19,375 square foot garden center.
The total square footage for the PCD remained unchanged at
315,580 square feet. The city Commission approved this
request on November 211 1989.
2. May of 1991 - request to include the following:
a. Addition of a new driveway onto woolbright Roadl located
west of S.W. 8th Street;
b. Change in use and size of the outparcel at the northwest
corner of Woolbright Road and S.W. 8th street from 4/000
square feet of retail commercial to a 1,250 square foot
gas station (this portion of the request was withdrawn by
the applicant, from the submittal);
c.
change in size, number of stories and designation of use
of the outparcel at the northeast corner of Woolbright
Road and S.W. 8th street from a 4,300 square foot retail
building to a two-story I 6 I 000 square foot bank with
drive-through;
,
tJ 4'-
-4 ./
d.
Addition of another driveway from S.W. 8th street to the
shopping center outparcels located on the east side of
S.W. 8th street;
e. Relocate southward the approved driveway located on the
east side of S.W. 8th street that leads to the shopping
center outparcels; and
f. Eliminate the north access aisle connection between the
outparcels located on the east side of S.W. 8th street
and the Home Depot site.
Tpe modtfj.ca,tions to square footage resulted in a net increase
df 1,700' square feet I thereby increasing the total square
footage for the PCD from 315 I 580 to .317/21l0 square feet
(within the limit allowed by the 1990 settlement agreement).
This request was presented to the Planning and Zoning Board
(now known as the Planning and Development Board) on August
13/1991. The Board recommended approval of the request,
with the exception of the additional driveway on Woolbright
Road. The minutes from the August 201 1991 and September 19,
1991 city Commission meetings state that the request was
tabled at the request of the City Attorney because of a
pending motion in the Tradewinds case and that the City
Attorney wished to confer with counsel for Tradewinds on the
issue. A review of City records indicate the request was not
removed from the table.
3. March of 1993 - request to include the addition of 8,745
square feet to the garden center at the home Depot. The
garden center increased from 19,375 square feet to 28/120
square feet. Pursuant to the 1990 settlement agreement, the
square footage of the garden center is not included as part of
the retail gross leasable area. The request included
adjusting property lines to accommodate the expansion and the
total square footage of the project remained at 31'7l~.
rtJ7 / /~ '} J
/:.1~- C; ~ . Ii
'? ":l"') ,
TO: Planning and Development Board
-3-
March 9, 1995
On April 201 1993 the city Commission approved the 8/745
square foot expansion subject to staff comments, and on August
101 1993 the Planning and Development board approved a waiver
of platting for the adjusted property lines in connection with
the expansion.
4. March of 1993 - request to include the following:
a. Subdivision of Tract B to create a .957 acre outparcel.
Tract B is that portion of the PCD that is located on the
west side of S.W. 8th Street;
b. Change in use and size of the outparcel at the northwest
corner of woolbright Road and S.W. 8th Street from 4,000
square feet of retail commercial to a 3,040 square foot
gas station (resurrection of the portion of the 1991
request that was withdrawn by the applicant);
c. Add two new driveways into the proposed service station
outparcel - one on S. W. 8th street and the other on
Woolbright Road;
d. Allow a canopy over the gasoline pumps to encroach the
setbacks due to a difference in the service station
regulations in effect in 1986 vs. the service station
regulations in effect in 1993; and
e. Reduce the building square footage specified on the
master plan for Tract B from 62 ~ 000 to 55, 04<:; square
feet. ])'S $r(jO.J ~l;~OJ)
Wi th this request, the total \ s~uare footag~ - of ,the PCD
decreased 6/960 square feet from ~17/ceO to ~,~20~on April
201 1993 the City Commission approved the request, subject to
staff comments. As a result of the traffic evaluation of the
proposed service station use, the square footage on Tract B
decreased 24,000 square feet from a total of 55/040 square
feet (52,000 commercial/retail plus 3,040 convenience
store/gasol ine sales) to 31/040 square feet ( 28 I 000
commercial/retail plus 3,040 convenience store/gasoline
sales) . Therefore I the total square footage of the PCD
decreased 24/000 square feet from 310,JlO to 20g,320 square
feet. 30~tP>-jO ~:;~}l,~O
ANALYSIS ;.G ,
Changes in Planned Commercial Development (PCD) master plans are
reviewed consistent with Section 6.F.13.b. of Appendix A - Zoning
as follows:
b. "Modifications to approved plans which result in an
increase of less than ten (10) per cent in measurable
impacts as determined by including any changes in traffic
generated I water consumed or sewage to be collected will
require review and recommendation the planning and zoning
board and final approval by the city commission. The
city commission decision to approve, approve with
modifications or deny I shall be predicated upon a finding
of consistency with the comprehensive plan and a finding
that any such increase will not result in a negative
impact on infrastructure delivery systems or the
surrounding area in general. It is the intent of this
section that all additional impacts be mitigated. ..11
Based on the documentation providedl the changes to the three
outparcels would generate in excess of a ten (10) per cent increase
in water consumed and sewage collectedl if the approved outparcels
are evaluated against the proposed outparcels. An increase of only
2.8% in water consumed and sewage collected results if the proposed
TO: Planning and Development Board
-4-
March 9, 1995
outparcels are evaluated against the entire PCD water and sewer
impacts. In either scenario, the utility Department does not have
an objection to the analysis provided and has not indicated that
the increase will have a negative impact on the infrastruture
delivery systems. A slight increase in pervious area will result
in a minimal, positive impact on the PCD drainage.
with respect to traffic, the traffic information submitted
indicates that the traffic generated by the three outparcels will
generate less than a ten (10) percent change. This information
has been forwarded to Palm Beach County. The results of the review
by the County have not been received at the time of this report.
The following is an evaluation of each of the proposed changes
listed on page one of this report:
1. Subdivision of Tract C to make outbuilding 3 a separate
outparcel and the redistribution of square footage among the
outparcels As indicated in the stipulation settlement
agreement I this is acceptable. Platting or a waiver of
platting (at the determination of the City Engineer) to
subdivide this parcel is required. As requiredl outparcels
shall be self-sufficient with respect to lot sizel setbacks,
parking and other PCD zoning district requirements.
2. Relocation of the existing driveway on the east side of S.W.
8th Street, south of the main entrance into the shopping
center (Home Depot) - One entrance, in addition to the main
entrancel was allowed pursuant to the 1990 settlement
agreement. This existing driveway is the additional driveway
referenced in the agreement. The proposed location of this
additional driveway is closer to the original position
(centrally located) identified in the Barton-Aschman traffic
report, upon which the traffic conditions of the 1990
settlement agreement were based.
3. Addition of a second driveway on the east side of S.W. 8th
streetl between Woolbright Road and the main entrance to the
shopping center (Home Depot) - As mentioned in previous item
#21 the number of driveways is specifically limited in the
1990 settlement agreement. The addition of a second driveway
is inconsistent with the 1990 settlement agreement. since the
Barton-Aschman report does not require an additional driveway
to be added, it could be argued that this driveway is not
needed and that safety and level of service are not impaired
without it.
Furthermore, this type of access design is contrary to the
intent and purpose of a PCDI which is to provide for a planned
(not piece-meal) , programmed series of development operations,
designed as a whole through integration of principle buildings
-and outbuildings that are linked via common use of access and
infrastructure and similar architecture and other aesthetic
elements. Specifically with respect to access, this
additional driveway defeats the purpose of requiring internal
access roads and driveways to serve parcels within a planned
development.
It should also be noted that the Barton-Aschman report stated
J' that thefdriveway on the east side of S.W. 8th Street located
north 0 the existing main entrance driveway was to be
(l deleted. The proposed master plan still reflects this
~iveway as being approved.
\\
,\ 'V ~'
~
~
~
';:;\"
\0,~.
\~
'\4'
TO: Planning and Development Board
-5-
March 9, 1995
4. Median cut in S. W. 8th street If approvedl this new
intersection would capture much of the traffic anticipated and
designed to be received by the main driveway that is located
at the entrance to Home Depot. The main driveway is centrally
located for the major portion of the retail uses located on
the east side of S.W. 8th street. Since the Barton-Aschman
report did not recommend a median cut, it could be argued that
the proposed median cut is not consistent with the traffic
report referenced in the 1990 settlement agreement and
therefore not needed or possibly affecting level of service.
Therefore, if the median cut is approvedl it is recommended
that a new analysis of the turning movements be submitted to
determine the impact the median cut will have on S. W. 8th
street and Woolbright Road.
Alsol the proposed median cut would cause the east driveway
into the site to become a major driveway which requires a one
hundred (100) foot throat; the distance from the property line
~_ to a parking space or an access aisle. This would
~ignificantlY impact the parking design of outbuilding 3.
CONCLUSION
This request was reviewed by the Technical Review Committee (TRC)
on February 281 1995 and the committee raised no objections at the
time. However I the committee did not have technical data regarding
the impact the median cut and additional driveway would have on the
surrounding roadways or the project itself. If this driveway and
median cut are approved by the commission, the Police Department
recommends that north and south deceleration lanes be required at
the cut to avoid congestion from motorists slowing down to make
___ turns at this location (see Exhibit liD" police Department
Memorandum No. 95-0121) . It is also recommended that if any
changes are approved by the commission that are not reflected I or
are contrary tOI the proposed master plan, that three copies of a
revised master plan be submitted to the planning and zoning
Department, prior to submittal of any future PCD requests. The
Planning and zoning Department is not making a specific
recommendation on this request since components of the request are
inconsistent with the latest settlement agreement. Deviation from
this agreement are viewed as policy decisions of the Commission.
tjh
Attachments
xc: Central File
A:WooIPCD
C I T Y
o F
BOY N TON
B E A C H
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
AGE N D A
DATE:
TuesdaYI February 281 1995
TIME:
9:00 A.M.
PLACE:
Conference Room "C"I 2nd Floorl West Wing
1. Introduction
2. old Business
NONE
3. New Business
A. LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDERS (other than site plans)
MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
q~~DDI
I'
1.
PROJECT:
Shoppes of Woolbright PCD
LOCATION:
Woolbright Road and southwest 8th
Street.
DESCRIPTION:
Adjustment of outparcel building
square footages and various driveway
accesses to them.
NOTE:
Written comments (on legal size
paper), plans and/or documents to be
returned to the Planning and Zoning
Department within three (3) working
days following the meeting I (FridaYI
March 3, 1995 at 5:00 p.m.), unless
otherwise specified below.
B. REVIEW OF TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SITE PLAN REVIEW
COMMENTS AND PLANS RECEIVED
NEW SITE PLAN
1.
PROJECT:
Boynton Beach Tri-Rail Station
LOCATION:
East of High Ridge Road just north
of Gateway Boulevard.
DESCRIPTION:
Expanded parking and access to
Boynton Beach Tri-Rail Station.
7. Other Business
8. Comments by Members
9. Adjournment
The City shall furnish appropriate auxil iary aids and services
where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal
opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service,
programl or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Joyce
Costello, (407)375-6013 at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to
the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably
accommodate your request.
.:TRCMMTG.22f\
),\
u)
~
t
~
g.
~
~
a:~
Qo
a:<{
WWCO
01-1-
-zW
(j)-(j)
, ~'(>/: -.
u
. ; t ~
u.
.;.jU)
-
<(0 '
~o
Wo'
c: ~
.co
LO
~'
~!%:~:~' 0 '
," ,..f'." ",.'^
, e,,' ,," ,<. ....,,' I-c{
,:".'>..,-,,;;,;,.,~ 5~
. a:w -,- .
,LL (j) ,
".,..,::.:4Y':",:,:
-,,,...,..
.;. ',"J ., -. .. . , '
,,'.' .::i'::;':,.-~~~~:::~.
.... .. ,.' 't~, ..;'i~~:~~~/'
_ _';.~_L :~..-'--<-_-=-
;~. ,.;..'
~"',' < .
..,;'
,-+. '
....
....
- ,-'
. , ','.'>: ~,;,;' ~.~
..~.~',.,~~,.
co -zW
C\l '. C/)-:- C/)
. I' , : C'. .
,,,,.:'
. ".,
,,'
~~'
....
~-i
...
...
Q, ....
~D
,...
-+
~D
0 ~O
+-
0 ....
~O '
...
....
,,) '.' -' ~,.'
, ,/t.;};;-~:."
: __, " . .,.r ' r:.~ "
..:;...., .;.--'
,.- "
P':. "
_,:1,
;,: :r~
.".1
" ',-'.'
,'" :/,
: :- oJ ~: ~:~~
,~'
. .....,'
,.....;l
';~:;~f. 7,.: ;.~;"
. ..:~\:\
" \
~ . -) , ,
.,
'. ~ '- -,
o
co
. " .
... ~. :' .'. . ~'.' ..
,~
+-
....
,. .~..-
C\I
-J
W
U
c:
~
t-.
:::>
o
".;Li,t~~
'I .", l ~ : ~'.':! .
:1.:,'
~. . \~., ;:
. 'J',','
"
',' ~..::J
: : ,!~
,'S..;
1 f'~
r..,. ,.
(J)
Oz
~o
ro~
~J:
.
......
o
q,OJ
:!!
c
CO>
m
,.-,. . s::\
f ; r~:~ ~' . ~
Smmr- Q_____
' , g (j)li~ J---'
1111111"- I ?--, ~ ~~. ~
r: ~~~ tP
C'\. ...., o~~ m
to ~ ~ F ~p-l ~
-J w ~ . o;D ge
, ~ I ~ ~p CD
';,m ?l.~ ~ .
~(")r- ~.. ~'2.
P~*#,:p ~...~. ~~
~)> p ~ Q~'\
Ol r- ~\C
-191.92' ...~ - IJ' ~~~
-...- N,OO 24- 11~ E
--
~
. .
..
~~~
....0, C~
n ~O~)
.V..~
,~9- "...~o
~- ....~
,;S ~/
20 ~ /
-,p ,?
..
~~,
.,.
'~
1~
--~
CO,
(1)0
m3:1
. [ 3:
1"11011
, ILO/j
/
/ "'" ...
....
~
~
'\.
...~
~
,
...
~I
..
. J;.-.
~~c:.
(")
o
~
0(3
r-
m
~
:<;
It
'-Lt
.
~ ,
f ~ r-'~-a
. ~ mm)>
, III en-- ~ r-
r g oS:
s--- ~ ~~
~k.~F<~
~ ~ ?b~
l ... !Jl b :0
~ I\) . "'. '0 l/O
''''m
"'_ .m. CD
.... Oll~ ~
~ ~!:: /:~..~ .
. )OOZ~ 119'2-
z m~ 7' ~......
~ ~ b ~'-l"-
_..._ --191.92'- ...:::::-.::- ~ \J> C"- 'O~
NOO 24' 11. E ~ "1'\
- ......
~
.. .'
fJ)
Oz
~O
I" ro~
~::t
· ft
....
. g.as
I . :D
If a
. Q
1 m
,
.
I
I
1
~~~\-.
.. '.. I
. .. '..
II '.-',
Co) l:::
'" '"
..~ i\ ...
.,.... ....
~,
....
0
~
".". '"
-,$-
c; 'f.o;, ~'S' ...
(11
r 1;~ -:r
", ",
4-
~1
~ ~.-:
q>
m -" Q)
)00 '" Ul
c;Lo....
~ 0, (1l
~ ~c.i
,... ~
'. ~
~ ~
~ ....". /~ro <"
~ ....0
~ \
(g
5- \
:::0.;
/\
ce, '6
~ ~
o
r-
o:J
-'!.
,
?o..
""
\
\
'-l-t
---~~._----------------
- ------,-_.~---'~. ~.- -.--- <
. .
.. .
(j)
Oz
~o
ro~
~:I:
.
....
o
q,tD
;D
a
G>
m
t'
~~
'..,
'(~
~.,.
~~
o ;,
o
r-
OJ
;0,
C5 ~
X
-I
~1 -;, ~
. I
I
I
~1
.....
f s~~.~ ~:' ,~~
! 1 g (1)03: '~~ ~\..
11111111~" ?-- ~ 5::E ~ . Ar cJlt.~
~I m, ~)> ~,.
~ ~ CC:~m ~ O.'fw.O'~)
to ~ I\) F p~~ m ....6.1 Q. ,\,\~f)
-..J ~ ?'. ""l :D ,'I' ·
Cf r ~ g:D ;;:: y.
~'~m ~~P go ,;5"\"~
e" ;'J.~ /:~S; y~ /'
(B~~ ~ri:" ~i"'';::::- b
. z m..........- =!J ~'\~.
~ ~ ~ ~'>J~
_..._ -191.92'- ...~ ~ va c~ Q(J:.
NOO 24' 1r E t\ ~?-'>J'I
__ S
..,.
0)
coo;'f"'"
10
"
.....
......
--;1
COI
(1)0
m3:1
, . [~l,
~ Icn~V/
' I "T1~ I
. ~-//
/
/ 'v ...
:;:
y..
1.~
~
~'r
~
"
""
'.
cp
m ..J.0l
)> N~
o:o~
~ 'o,()I
~ ~c.i
r- ~
, ", '. ~
, ~
~ ~~ -, :':.
'.. ,.\ c.l
" 0
\ \.
\ \\
,-~.,.....-:J
01,
01
I'
.1
, I
-f ' ,
~. s JL
1ul( u
It
J