Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS - .~~ . . ---- , ~ ^-1PM. ---- . T~ fu ~~~.~. ~ ~ }(JP}.f li'ti'ddz @ . ..~~. ~,A-:I;~ \ . ~. ..': , . r"'r'- ,,' ,,~-E~ . "., ' , ~tf/l;~~~~'G~ ~~- (l . - ~""-.~, ~-. ~ ""---. -" ~!a" ,- < (!) , .,~ ~~~a-. (, ~.~~ !~}~,~ ~/~ ~~. U ~ ~ /7L~A_.-a/~' 'J ~.pw- ;J:~~ p-~br~'~~ 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ .9->--- ;:fh- /It~~ --- ~~&.~~~~' ~~ff-~?C~- ~ ~ e-r-- f-& ~ ~ t4~~-+ ~ ~-~~6f-":';'~*' ~. 4~~:I,,~~,---~. . ~.., ~ /. 51,,,0 ?'I.,v .~~~ J. '-, 1. ffIJO ....J \\"~ _ ~ / __ ~ 'lfP'. t 00 t"'" ~~~~-f- __~~~ _==.~"': - '" .,~~n~' , ., /1-..- .-fi':f; ~ /J.dlv~~ #1, ". ' '. " 1]'1 \,.b ~"-~!~'~_A~P',/~ -~-,,-~'" - ""-" fA[CW, ~, " -,' r# j . fl"l " III , , b.. · \ !(>:..~;r:d4V~~,. I ~~. . w~~ ~.~ .' \, f *:~j~5.~ i~~ ,~r~,4/ ," , . ~ Ct (p e'O d . 1 , ' b4-.6'~' ~50 ' 5(!)' J qrrD " I'?/~ '~I e::5 5 S S ' "Dv , ~ ;/ I 1 0 ~ 0 . '. ,,,,,,.,_., I,~~ ~4 '5 '533'{)O 31 ' . . : .".," " ';1.0 < " .-/' ~l yr;ro ---~h~ I. hi ~'1 Do-1 ~.V' \ " \ ' ...;r: }'. ~.t>'''' 't" 4l~~"" '., i' ,."I~3--1 · ,~" ~. ,,' ~ ,'~1~ '* II' r . ~~..- . -=-,.- ;'-7._;.,<-r~. ;. /'1,.,'~ ,.IJ~~,..:r~__.' - ", ,,";/"1& ~y .{:. ~.;.,,;,-, >l\' ..L/ . 2>.'~ v " ~~.~.~~~ .~;: ~ ~/~~O ;i7 If!- . ~ V\l0 · .v "~~ ..! ,~~~:-' " " ~ .. '.--" ". ' \ " . .~;;;~'-~.l . ~!' .~~':"'Y"""_r~ ~ J';;; }i!l"",,':'PT'~ I ,<r~,",./,'f""'~- 'f".-' ~- \.; /-' f' '1" f \ ' . ." --"-~---- , ..... . " ~ . ~:.... . PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORM~DUM NO. 93-250 FROM: ~~t Miller, City Manager ~ -aJ'--"'" Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director TO: DATE: September 27, 1993 RE: Tradewinds This is a response to your memorandum on Tradewinds asking me to review the stipulated settlements for items that have not been completed. S W 8th st has not been completed with a turnaround and questions surrounding the industrial access road and railroad crossing have never been settled. As far as I know, all other conditions within the settlement agreement have been met. This review did not include any review of conditions on plats, site plans or master plans. I hope this memorandum is of some help to you. If you should have any questions, please feel free to call me. CC : f rb A:93-250 r<ECEIVED s t:.~ 2 7 1993 CrrvMANAGffiSOFr;,~ . PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 91-196 fO//{)LU //06 (/+1 S D u4- I'-{;~ FROM: J. ~cott Mill;], ~~ty Manager c1U?~~~~~ng Director Jv6 J~ ){ /-1 vf1I ' () c c u I'E TO: DATE: August 14, 1991 SUBJECT: Planning & Zoning Board Meeting - August 13, 1991 Please be advised that the Planning and Zoning Board met on Tuesday, August 13, 1991, and took the following action: 1. Unanimously elected an Acting Chairman, Nathan Collins, in the absence of Mr.Rosenstock and Mr. Lehnertz. 2. After conducting a public hearing, unanimously recommended approval of the request submitted by Horace Williams for the abandonment of a 20 foot wide alley at l009 North Federal Highway, subject to proviso. The motion was made by Mrs. Greenhouse and seconded by Mr. Howard. (PM91-197) 3. After conducting a public hearing, unanimously recommended denial of the conditional use request submitted by Horace Williams to establish a used car lot to be known as Williams Auto Sales at 1009 North Federal Highway. The motion was made by Mrs. Huckle and seconded by Mrs. Greenhouse. (PM91-198) 4. After conducting a public hearing, recommended denial of the request submitted by the City, in connection with the Boynton Beach Activity Center site plan, of a variance to Section 5-138 "Scope"(a) of Article X-Parking Lots. The motion was made by Mrs. Greenhouse and seconded by Mrs. Huckle. The vote was 4-2 with Mr. Collins and Mr. Hinson dissenting. The Board unanimously approved the request of the variance to Section 5-142(h)(7) "Driveway" of Article X, Parking Lots. The motion was made by Mrs. Huckle and seconded by Mrs. Greenhouse. (PM91-200) 5. Unanimously recommended approval of the site plan request submitted by the City for the Boynton Beach Activity Center; a 6,640 square foot recreation activity center and 89 space parking lot to replace the existing Tennis Center, subject to proviso. The motion was made by Mrs. Greenhouse and seconded by Mr. Howard. (PM91-201) 6. The Board approved in part and denied in part the master plan modification submitted by Kilday and Associates for the Shoppes of Woolbright P.C.D. as follows: a) Denied the request for an additional driveway onto Woolbright Road (item #l of Planning Department Memorandum No. 91-165). T~ motion was made by Mrs. Huckle and seconded by Mrs.)Stevens. The vote was 5-1 with Mr. Collins dissentingi. b) Unanimously approved the request to change the size, number of stories and use designation of the outparcel at the northeast corner of Woolbright Road and S.W. 8th Street from a 4,300 square foot retail building to a two story, 6,000 square foot bank (item #3 of Planning Department Memorandum Mo. 91-165). The motion was made by Mrs. Huckle and seconded by Mrs. Greenhouse. Planning Dept. Memorandum 91-196 Page 2 c) Unanimously approved the request to add another driveway onto S.W. 8th Street from the shopping center and outparcels and to relocate the approved driveway southward, subject to eliminating one of the two access aisle connections between the outparcels and Home Depot and relocating the remaining access aisle connection to behind (east) outparcel 2, (items #4 and #5 of Planning Department No. 91-165). The motion was made by Mr. Howard and seconded by Mrs. Huckle. The Board accepted the Planning Department's recommendation to require the amended plans within 3 weeks of the date of approval rather than within the time period stated in condition #1 of Planning Department Memorandum No. 91-183. The request to change the size and use designation of the outparcel at the northeast corner of Woolbright Road and S.W. 8th Street (item #2 of Planning Department Memorandum No. 91-165) was withdrawn at the applicant's request. In addition, the applicant is requesting an appeal to the Planning and Zoning Board's denial of the request for an additional driveway onto Woolbright Road-(a) above. (PM91-206) 7. Unanimously made a finding of consistency with the Comprehensive Plan for the amendment to Chapter 19 to implement a new site plan review ordinance, subject to proviso. Motion was made by Mrs. Greenhouse and seconded by Mr. Howard. In addition, the Board requested that they receive a copy of the revised ordinance prior to the September 3, 1991 City Commission meeting. (PM91-202) 8. Deleted the consistency review determination of the proposed Adrninstrative Procedures Ordinance from the agenda since this ordinance has not been completed by staff. This item will be placed on a future Planning and Zoning Board agenda. 9. The Board tabled action with respect to the consistency review determination of the proposed amendment to Appendix A-Zoning, Section 11.1 of the Code of Ordinances to allow for expansion of nonconforming structures, until the September 10, 1991, Planning and Zoning Board meeting to allow staff sufficient time to incorporate the changes recommended by the Board. 10. The Board accepted the Planning Department's recommendation to postpone the consistency review of the proposed amendments to Appendix B-Planned Unit Developments of the Code of Ordinances, Section 6.F - Planned Commercial Development District and Section 7 - Planned Industrial Development District of Appendix A-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances to create time extensions for master plan approvals, until the September 10, 1991 Planning and Zoning Board meeting. 11. Deleted the consistency review determination of the proposed amendment to Appendix A-Zoning to allow towing companies in the M-1, Light Industrial zoning district from the agenda. 12. Unanimously made a finding of consistency with the Comprehensive Plan for the amendment to the Zoning Code to allow wholesale/distribution of prepackaged and prepared meat and poultry in the C-4, General Commercial, zoning district, subject to proviso. Motion was made by Mrs. Greenhouse and seconded by Mr. Howard. (PM91-199) Planning Dept. Memorandum 91-196 Page 3 13. Unanimously approved the Lawrence Lake PUD 12 month time extension for exemption from concurrency, subject to posting surety for the incomplete, required improvements. The motion was made by Mrs. Stevens and seconded by Mr. Howard. 14. Unanimously recommended that the City Commission initiate a change to the minimum frontage required by the Code of Ordinances for service stations with or without major repairs from 175 feet to 240 feet. The motion was made by Mrs. Greenhouse and seconded by Mrs. Huckle. (PM91-203) 15. The Board requested a copy of the Planning Department's list of expired site plan approvals as soon as it is completed by the Planning Department. TJH/jm encls. cc: Don Jaeger, Building Director Mike Haag, Site Development PM91-196.JM PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 91-206 (AGENDA MEMORANDUM) FROM: ~J' cott Miller, City MapagEY; fh.v~... ~.~~ C ristoPhe~C~ann1ng Director~ TO: DATE: August 14, 1991 SUBJECT: Shoppes of Woolbright P.C.D. - Master Plan Modification (driveways and outparcels) Please place the referenced item on the City Commission agenda for August 20, 1991 under Development Plans, Nonconsent Agenda. DESCRIPTION: Request submitted by Kilday and Associates for approval of an amended master plan to allow relocation and addition of driveways, and changes in size and use of outparcels. The project is located at the northeast and northwest corners of Woolbright Road and S.W. 8th Street. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Board denied that part of this master plan modification which requests an additional driveway onto Woolbright Road (item #1 of attached Planning Department Memorandum No. 91-165). The applicant is requesting an appeal of the denial by the Planning and Zoning Board. If the City Commission grants the additional driveway onto Woolbright Road, it is recommended that approval be subject to condition #4 of the attached Planning Department Memorandum No. 91-183 and the attached letter from Richard Staudinger, dated July 9, 1991. CC/jm PM91-206.JM <r~ tJ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 9l-l04CC Supplemental Memorandum To: Christopher cutro, Director of Planning From: W. Richard Staudinger, P.E., City Engineer Re: Technical Review Board Comments Woolbright Place Master Plan Modification Supplemental Comments Pursuant to your review and discussions with me concerning comments in the referenced memorandum, I concur with the fol- lowing comments which are numbered to correspond to memo 104CC. 1. 2. 3a. 3b. 4. Does not apply any longer because Master Plan comments associated with the Engineering Department comments were resolved and new submittal was for commercial use not for a gas station. Same resolution as No. 1 above. Comment still applies. No variance procedure is required. In accordance with Appendix A, Section 6, Item 13 (Page 1924.14) this modification request proceeds from TRB to Planning & Zoning for a decision and is appealable to the City Commission by the applicant. Comment was directed to indicate "the intent of the Code". However, the exact application procedure outlined in this section applies directly to P.U.D. plan changes, not PCDls. Comment does not apply, because, as you pointed out, definitions for double frontage lots and corner lots page 1884 (definitions) of Appendix A (zoning Code) clearly indicate this situation does not constitute a double frontage lot. ~ W. Richard Staudinger, P.E. the on RECEIVED AU6 1 PLANNIl~G DEPT. July 9, 1991 GEE & JENSON MEMORANDUM FROM: Tambri Heyden, s~nner Richard staudi.ngf~lr;~O Woolbright ShOPP'~ (Woolbright PCD) Proposed Driveway TO: RE: Enclosed, is a copy of a letter from Ken Rogers, and my response, concerning the referenced project. His response addressed the capacity issue on Woolbright Road and none of the engineering department comments listed in Memorandum No. 91-104CC of June 19, 1991. Specifically, items 3 and 4 of the referenced memorandum address lot frontages and the approved circulation plans (inter- nal access only) for the approved PCD, and the violation of lot frontage criteria and of the approved circulation pattern by the proposed master plan modification. The engineering department memorandum does not specifically comment on the location of the proposed driveway with respect to the intersection of SW 8th Street and Woolbright Road. WRS:kvc 91-025 n GEE & JENSON July 9, 1991 Mr. K. S. Rogers Consulting Engineer, Inc. 1495 Forest Hill Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33406 Re: Woolbright PCD/Proposed Driveway Correspondence of July 3, 1991 Dear Mr. Rogers: with respect to your correspondence as referenced above, the following name and address should be utilized by you in the future: Mr. W. Richard Staudinger, P.E. Gee & Jenson E-A-P, Inc. One Harvard Circle West Palm Beach, FL 33409-1923 This will ensure speedy receipt of your correspondence by this office. With regard to your letter of July 3, 1991, I appreciate your concern about the proposed driveway not affecting the capacity of Woolbright Road by FDOT's guide lines manual for Planning. However, capacity concerns were not mentioned in the engineering department memorandum outlining TRB comments for this submittal (Engineering Department, Memo 91-104CC, June 19, 1991). The Planning Department, however, has commented upon both the location of the driveway with respect to the SW 8th street intersection and the potential effect of the driveway on the capacity of Woolbright Road. If the master plan modification is approved to allow such a driveway, I suggest you may wish to propose a deceleration and right turn lane into this driveway and a possible acceleration lane for traffic returning to Woolbright Road to insure no loss of capacity as a result of the drive. This statement is not to be construed in any way as a conditional approval by the engineering department of the driveway with the lanes suggested. WRS:kvc 91-025 ve~y ~ours, V{:l(iftf W. Richard Stauding d------ P.E. One Harvard Circle. West Palm Beach, Florida 33409-1923 ' 407/683-3301 ' FAX 407/686-7446 K.S, ROGERS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC, 1495 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite F West Palm Beach, FL 33406 (407) 964-7300 (FAX) 969-9717 July 3, 1991 ~~(; ll1: ~ \l{IE!l)) J U L 8 1991 Mr. David Staudinger, P.E. Gee & Jenson 2001 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 GEE & JENSON RE: Woolbright Shoppes Woolbright Road Turnout Dear Dave: Following up on the City of Boynton Beach TRB meeting of Tuesday, June 25, 1991, I am forwarding to you additional information in support of the proposed turnout planned for Woolbright Road west of S.W. 8th Street. Attached please find a copy of Page 15 of "Chapter 14-97, State Highway System Access Management Classification System and Standards", FDOT, December, 1990. On Page 15, the minimum drive- way spacing on the departing side of an intersection is shown as 230 feet, The proposed driveway onto Woolbright Road will meet or exceed this requirement. It should al so be mentioned that Woolbright Road is not State maintained, but County maintained, and that the County's standard is 75 feet from an intersection. As this driveway location will meet both the County and the FDOT spacing criteria, it is presented that absent any specific data to the contrary, this proposed driveway is properly and safely located. Also attached, please find pages 1-1 through 1-6 of APPENDIX I "Guidelines on Determining Input Values for a Planning Level of Service Analysis", "Florida's Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manual for Planning", This document published by FDOT establishes the roadway capacities for all collector and arterial roads in the State of Florida. The procedure used by the State of Florida in determining the through capacity of a road does not use right turns, driveway locations or frequency as a variable. Although, theoretically, any driveway which gives an opportunity for vehicles to either exit or enter a roadway will have an impact on the capacity of a road, I cannot agree with the posi- tion that this driveway should be denied because it will reduce the capacity on Woolbright Road. Mr, David Staudinger, P,E. Gee & Jenson July 3, 1991 Woolbright Shoppes Page Two Upon reviewing this letter and the attachments, I will be avail- able at your convenience to discuss this if you have any further questions. Very truly yours, ~~...--= K,S. ~' P.E. KSR/jr Encl. CC: Mr. Chris Cutro Mr. David Levy , ) } I / 4. Comer Clearances for "isolated comers properties" are as follows: Corner Clearance at Intersections With Restrictive Median Position Approaching intersection Approaching intersection Departing intersection Departing intersection Access Allowed Right In/Out Right In Only Right In/Out Right Out Only Without Restrictive Median Position Approaching intersection Approaching intersection Departing intersection Departing intersection Access Allowed Full Access Right In Only** Full Access Right Out Only** Minimum (Feet) 115 75 230 (125)* 100 Minimum (Feet) 230 (125)* 100 230 (125)* 100 * Access Class 7 and Interim "Special Case" at 35 MPH or less, may use the measurements in parenthesis, ** Right In/Out, Right In Only, and Right Out Only connections on roads without restrictive medians shall, by design of the connection, effectively eliminate unpermitted movements, (j): Connections and median openings on a controlled access facility located up to 1/4 mile from an interchange area or up to the first intersection with an arterial road, whichever distance is. less, shall be regulated to protect the safety and operational efficiency of the limited access facility and the interchange area. The 1/~ mile distance shall be measured from the end of the taper of the ramp furthest from the interchange, 14-97,003 Access Management Classification System and Standards 0" _ .. _ _ _ ~.~. .,".4 _ _ .. - _ .-~_ "',~" _~",",>,..,.._..c,......,. ._ ----..--- Page 15 APPENDIX I ) GUIDLELINES ON DETERMINING INPUT VALUES FOR A PLANNING LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS ) ---~-_.._,.,_..__._---~.._~~~'~----- -. -"+~-'-----'-"" --"---"'~---~--'~--- APPENDIX I Form 281.10 MEMORANDUM Stale of Florida Depanmenl of Transportallon DATE February 19, 1988 --- TO District Directors of Planning and Programs '-Qo ~ :..- Bob Krzeminski, Acting Chief, Bureau of Multi-Modal Syst~s Planning Pat McCue FROM COPIES TO SUBJECT Guidelines on Determining Input Values for a Planning level of Service Analysis ) On October 27, 1987, George Reed sent the Department's Generalized Daily level of Service Maximum Volumes and accompanying text to you. Traffic characteristics vary within Florida and traffic, roadway and signalization characteristics vary by roads. After discussion with all District staffs and approximately half of the MPO and RPC staffs, some requested guidance on how to determine values which may be more appropriate for a planning level of analysis for a local area or a spe~ific roadway. The attached text provides that guidance and should help your staffs in meeting local desires. These guidelines should not be viewed as providing a total answer or procedure to modify the tables for any particular local circumstance. However, these should be viewed as a source of information as to the sensitivity of the factors used in developing the Generalized level of Service Tables and as a minimum approach to be used in data gathering to justify modifying any of the factors. Other considerations such as peak seasonal traffic variations could require the collection of additional data beyond that defined in the guidelines. The Bureau of Multi-Modal Systems Planning welcomes comments on these guidelines and will reassess them during 1988.' Please contact me or Doug Mcleod (SC 278-9745) with your comments or questions. ) I - 1 ( \ GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING INPUT VALUES FOR A PLANNING LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS 1.0 INTRODUCTION In October, 1987, the Department published Generalized Daily Level of Service Maximum Volumes tables. Table 1 is the summary table for urbanized areas. Accompanying the tables was a text on the development and use of the tables. The tables are based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual and actual Florida traffic and signalization data, making the tables applicable throughout Florida. Therefore, the Department strongly encourages their use. However, it is recognized that traffic characteristics vary within Florida and that traffic, roadway and signalization characteristics vary by roads. Therefore. the tables are not statewide standards which must be adhered to; rather, they are planning guidelines on the measurement of highway level of service. Development of regional, district or metropolitan tables, or unique values for individual roadways may be desired by the Department or other transportation entities. Development of localized tables or values should coordinate with the Department's District Planning staffs. The following guidance is provided on developing more precise values for individual areas and roadways. Like the level of service tables, this guidance does not represent Department standards for developing localized level of service tables. However, this guidance does represent an acceptable planning method. The use of other procedures should be agreed to by the Department (District Director of Planning and Programs or his/her designatee) before concurrence on such an alternative methodology can be given. The Department's "r4anual of Uniform Traffic Studies" should be consulted for more detailed traffic engineering study activities. I - 2 2.0 VARIABLES OF AND FIELD DATA COLLECTION FOR LEVEL OF SERVICE TABLES The variables used on the Generalized Daily Level of Service Maximum Volumes tables may be divided into three broad categories: traffic characteristics. roadway characteristics and signalization characteristics. Traffic variables include: (1) K or Design Hour Factor (2) D or Directional Factor (3) PHF or Peak Hour Factor (4) Lefts ) Roadway variables include: (1) Arterial Class (2) Lane Capacity (3) Left Turn Bays (4) Terrain (level in Florida) (S) Free Flow Speed Signalization variables include: (1) Arrival Type (2) Signalized Intersections per Mile (3) C or Cycle Length (4) A weighted 9/C. or Effective Green Time ) 1-3 ( \ Each of these variables is defined and discussed in this text. When developing individual area or roadway level of service tables, all the variables' inputs should be reviewed. Of the thirteen variables used in the level of service tables, the most sensitive variables are the K factor, the 0 factor, the number of signalized intersections per mile, and the weighted g/e. Any study which attempts to generate localized level of service tables or values for a specific roadway should at a minimum analyze those four variables. None of these four variables should not be altered without an analysis and as appropriate, alteration of the other variables. This eliminates the possibility of only selective changes being made that could show results benefiting a particular interest. ( Table 2 provides general guidance on the relative sensitivity of the variables to level of service planning calculations and whether field data collection is suggested. Guidelines for determining values are provided in subsequent sections. 1-4 Table 1 Generalized Daily Level Of Service Maximum Volumes for Florida's Urbanized Areas. ([eeu. Date: October 27. 1987: Va11d for Ue. Tbroup December 1988) FREEWAYS (SarbarbaD) lANES lEVEL OF SERVICE C D E 4 49,800 59,700 63,000 6 74,600 89,600 94,600 8 99,500 119,400 126,100 10 124,400 149.300 157,600 FREEWAYS (CBD) MULTI-LANE MGHWAYS ness than 1 slgnal1zed Intersection f:Very 2 m1les) lANES u::vEL OF SERVICE C D E 4 42,000 53,300 59,700 6 62,900 79,900 89,600 lANES lEVEL OF SERVICE C D E 4 54,800 64.200 69,900 6 82,100 96.300 104,800 8 109.500 128,400 139,700 10 136,900 160,500 174,700 PRINCIPAL ARTERIALS GROUP 1 (0.5 to 2.5 slgnal1zed Inter- I sections per mlle) I lANES lEVEL OF SERVICE I C DEI 2 15,800 17,100 18,400 I 4 32,500 34,900 37.100 I 6 49,300 52,600 55.800 I GROUP 2 (2.6 to 5.0 signalized inter- sections per mile) GROUP 3 (more than 5 signalized inter- sections per mile) lANES lEVEL OF SERVICE C D E 2 8,400 12,900 15.300 4 17.300 27,300 31,700 6 26.300 42,100 48,200 lANES 2 4 6 LEVEL OF SERVICE C- D E 9,900 14,300 20.000 30,200 30.100 46,400 MINOR ARTERIALS GROUP 1 (0.5 to 2.5 signalized Inter- I GROUP 2 (2.6 to 5.0 signalized Inter- I GROUP 3 (more than 5 slgnal1zed inter- sections per mlle) I sections per mile) I secUons per mlle) I I lANES lEVEL OF SERVICE I lANES lEVEL OF SERVICE I lANES u::vEL OF SERVICE C D E C- D E I C- D E 2 13.600 15,000 16.200 I 2 10,700 13.100 2 6,200 12.300 4 28.200 30,600 32,800 I 4 22,800 27.400 I 4 12,700 26.300 8 42.900 46,300 49,300 I 8 34.200 41,900 I 6 19,200 40.600 I I ONE-WAY FACILITIES TWO-WAY COLLECTORS ) I GROUP 3 (more than 5 signalized (intersection analysis) GROUP 2 (2.6to 5.0 slgnal1zed inter- sections per mlle) I Intersections per mile) I LANES u:vEL OF SERVICE I lANES lEVEL OF SERVICE lANES lEVEL OF SERVICE C D E I C D E C D E 2 12.600 15,500 17.000 I 2 5.400 13.000 15,500 2 6,200 9,900 11,100 3 19.400 23,800 25,700 3 8.200 19,500 23,700 4 13,100 20,700 22,800 4 26.300 32,100 34,500 I 4 11.100 26.000 31,900 6 20.200 32.000 34,600 I ASSUMPTIONS MUL1l FREEWAY ..I&:iE. PRINCIPAL AR'T'EmAlS MINOR ARTF:RIALS ONE-WAY COllECTOR Suburb COO ~1 ~2 C-3 ~1 ~2 C-3 ~2 C-3 K .094 .Of;'! .09 ,09 .09 .09 .09 .09 .09 .11 .11 .09 D .59 .56 .57 .58 .58 .54 .58 .58 .54 1.00 1.00 .58 PHF .92 .92 .92 .92 .92 .92 .92 .92 .92 .92 .92 .92 Lefts NA NA NA .07 ,07 .07 .09 .09 .09 .07 .07 .12 Class NA NA NA I I II I I II I II NA Ln Cap 1900 1850 1850 1700 1700 1650 1650 1650 1650 1700 1650 1600 LBays NA NA NA Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Level Yes Yes Yes NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Speed NA NA 50 45 45 35 40 40 35 45 35 NA Arrtval NA NA NA 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 3 SI." NA NA <.5 1.5 4 7 1.5 4 7 4 7 NA C NA NA NA 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 gjC NA NA NA .50 .50 .50 .45 .45 .45 .55 .55 .35 ) · Values shown are average daily traffic max1mwn volumes (based on peak hour volumes) for levels of service and are based on the 1985 Highway CapacIty Manual and Florida tr.lffic data. The table does not consUtute a standard, but can be used (or general planning applications, .. Cannot be achieved. ... Signalized intersections per mtle. Source: Bureau oJ Multi-Modal System PIann1ng. Florida Department oCTransportation, 1987. 1-5 ( Table 2 Developing Localized Level of Service Tables Variables Sensitivity of Variance Suggested Field Data Reference in Text (Page) Traffi c. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 K D PHF Lefts High High Medium Low yes yes yes no 5 8 10 12 Roadway. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -. . . . . . . .14 Class Low no 14 Ln Cap Low no 15 L Bays High yes 16 Level Low no 17 Speed Medium yes 18 S i 9 na 1 ; z a t 1 0 n. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · 19 Arrival Medium no 19 S.!.* High yes 20 C Low yes 21 gfC High yes 22 ( * Signalized intersections per mile. . Source: Bureau of Multi-Modal Systems Planning Florida Department of Transportation, 1988. 1-6 BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO, 91-233 June 17, 1991 TO: Christopher Cutro, planning Director THRU: Don Jaeger, Building & Zoning Director~ FROM: Michael E. Haag, Zoning & site Development Administrator RE: TRB Comments - June 13, 1991 Meeting MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION - SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT, P.C.D. (Add to the project: Two (2) driveways on 8th street, 2nd floor and 1700 square feet to south outparcel on the east side of 8th street, decrease square footage of south outparcel on the west side of 8th street by 2,750 square feet and change use of same outparcel to gas station) Upon review of the above mentioned project, the following list of comments have been provided as a courtesy with the applicant's full knowledge that there will be a full review made when the project is placed on a future Technical Review Board agenda. 1, submit for review the Master plan drawing that was modified to comply with the staff comments of the May 1, 1990 Technical Review Board meeting, 2. In order to forward the Master Plan Modification to the Planning and Zoning Board with the proposed use of a gas station, the use must comply with Appendix A - Zoning section 11 L. A variance application from the Building Department must be presented to the Board of Adjustment for a determination. To obtain a Board of Adjustment variance application, contact the Plan Review and Permitting Division of the Building Department, 3, submit for review the Master Plan drawing of the entire Shoppes of woolbright, P.C.D, site, RECEIVED .JUN . :." PU\;r(!1\hii~\:..~ iDf.,PT. ' , - MINUTES - CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA MAY 2. 1995 No one else wished to speak under Public Audience. Therefore, Mayor Taylor declared the Public Audience closed. Shoppes of Woolbright PCD - TABLED CCl Consultants, Inc. Howard R. Scharlin, Trustee Northside of Woolbright Road, east of the L.W.D.D. E-4 Canal Master Plan Modification: Request to modify the pre- viously approved master plan to subdivide outbuilding 3 into .895 acres, revise the outbuilding sizes (outbuilding 1 from 4,300 to 6,920 square feet; out- building 2 from 5,000 square feet to 5,755 square feet and outbuilding 3 from two-stories and 6,000 square feet to one-story and 2,625 square feet), add a drive- way on the east side of S.W. 8th Street, 400 feet north of Woolbright Road, relocate the existing driveway on S.W. 8th Street, 190 feet to 260 feet north of Woolbright Road and provide a median cut on S.W. 8th Street for the relocated driveway City Manager Parker requested that this item remain tabled. She advised that negotiations are ongoing and an agreement might be reached by May 11th. The Commission agreed to address this at a special meeting before the May 11th workshop meeting if a settlement is reached by then. VIII. DEVELOPMENT PLANS A. Project: Agent: Owner: Location: Description: Boynton Commerce Center PID - TABLED Peter Reed, MIG Management Services of Florida, Inc. Boynton Commerce Center, Ltd. Souths ide of Woolbright Road, 100 feet west of 1-95 Use Approval: Request to amend the list of penmitted uses for the Boynton Commerce Center to allow wholesale distribution, retail, repair and assembly of lawn main- tenance equipment City Manager Parker advised that the applicant has requested that this item be withdrawn. B. Project: Agent: Owner: Location: Description: C. Request by Janet Hall to waive application fee for Lighthouse Grille Restaurant site plan review Mrs. Hall stated that this is a request to waive a second application fee for the same stage of the project. She explained that the architect and the engineer involved in this project left town, which necessitated acquiring another architect to get the same work done that should have been done in the first place. - 17 - MINUTES - CITY COMMISSION MEETING -BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 18. 1995 Palm Beach Le1surev111e Recreation I Michael P. Corbett Palm Beach Leisureville, Inc. 1007 Ocean Drive Major Site Plan Modification: Request to amend the previously approved site plan to construct a 1,685 square foot office addition to the recreation building Michael Corbett represented Palm Beach Leisureville in the expansion of their recreational building. He stated that the majority of the people who use this building are retired walk-in people. No employees are being added to the staff and no units are being added to the development. He concurred with the staff comments, but reserved the right to return and request a waiver of the parking space requirements. 3. Project: Agent: Owner: Location: Description: No one wished to speak in favor of or against this application. Therefore, Mayor Taylor declared the public hearing closed. Motion Mayor Pro Tem Matson moved to amend the previously approved site plan for Palm Beach Leisureville Recreation I to construct a 1,685 square foot office addition to the recreation building subject to staff comments. Commissioner Rosen seconded the motion which carried 5-0. At this point in the meeting, Mayor Taylor recognized County Commissioner Mary McCarty and her husband in the audience and welcomed them to Boynton Beach. B. Non-Consent Agenda - Not unanimously approved by the Planning and Develollllnt Board 1. Project: Shoppes of WOolbright PCD - TABLED Agent: CCl Consultants, Inc. OWner: Howard R. Scharlin, Trustee location: Norths1de of Woolbright Road, east of the L.W.O.D. E-4 Canal Description: Master Plan Modiftcat'on: Request to modify the previously approved master plan to subdivide out- building 3 into .895 acres, revise the outbuilding sizes (outbuilding 1 from 4,300 to 6,920 square feet; outbuilding 2 from 5,000 square feet to 5,755 square feet and outbuilding 3 from two-stories and 6,000 square feet to one-story and 2,625 square feet), add a driveway on the east side of S.W. 8th Street, 400 feet north of Woolbright Road, relocate the existing driveway on S.W. 8th Street, 190 feet - 21 - \ MINUTES - CITY COMMISSIOh MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, flORIDA APRIL 18, 1995 to 260 feet north of Woolbright Road and provide a median cut on S.W. 8th Street for the relocated driveway City Manager Parker advised that staff recommended keeping this item on the table since an agreement has not yet been finalized. Tara Oaks PUD - TABLED Kieran Kilday Northeast corner of Knuth Road extended and Woolbright Road T1.. Extension: Request for approval of an 18 month retroactive and an indefinite time extension for zoning/master plan approval and concurrency exemption/certification City Manager Parker advised that this item is ready to come off the table. 2. Project: Agent: Location: Description: Motion Mayor Pro Tem Matson moved to remove this item from the table. Vice Mayor Bradley seconded the motion which carried 5-0. The owner of the subject property, Bill Winchester, his attorney Michael Schroeder, and Tim Hernandez of Pulte Homes were present. Mr. Kilday represented Bill Winchester, the owner of the Tara Oaks PUD property. He stated that the_property is a very large linear piece of property located to the east of Quail Ridge and to the south of the project originally known as Stonehaven. The property extends all the way down to Woolbright Road. As part of the conditions of approval, a culvert crossing has been constructed over the canal which will allow access to the property from Woolbright Road. The project as it currently exists was approved after extensive public hearings in 1990, with final approval occurring in December, 1990. About the time it got through the approval process, the economic condition of the real estate industry deteriorated and the owner of the property has been struggling with the prop- erty. Previous extensions have been approved for this project with very little activity in the last year or so. The project sat there donmant and no exten- sions were requested until this past year. The project was approved with a medium land use density and 192 two-story garden apartments as well as a church on the south portion of the site. Mr. Kilday advised that the owner and his attorney diligently tried to move ahead. Various activities occurred on the site, the most significant of which was that the right-of-way for Knuth Road along that entire frontage was dedi- cated to the City and is now the necessary right-of-way to allow for the construction of Knuth Road. Penmits were issued for the clearing of the right- - 22 - ,.." ..,'-'I MINUTES - CITY COMMISSION t TING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 4, 1995 The Tabulation Committee recommended awarding this bid to Rosso Paving and Drainage Inc. of West Palm Beach, Florida. Two bids were received for this project. The bid from Florida Blacktop was incomplete because they did not bid on two items in the base bid. Rosso Paving and Drainage of West Palm Beach, Florida submitted a complete bid. The Engineering consultant, Gee & Jenson, and the Engineering Department recommended deleting Section 5 (landscape) from the contract document. Therefore, the total contract amount will be $54,562.00. City Attorney Cherof read Proposed Resolution No. R95-56 by title only. Motion Vice Mayor Bradley moved to approve Proposed Resolution No. R95-56. Commissioner Jaskiewicz seconded the motion which carried 4-0. VI. PUBLIC HEARING None. VII. PUBLIC AUDIENCE This item was dispensed with after Item VIII.C.l. VIII. DEVELOPMENT PlANS A. Consent Agenda - Unanimously approved by the Planning and Development Board None. B. Non-Consent Agenda - Not unanimously approved by the Planning and Development Board Description: Shoppes of WOolbright POD - TABLED CCL Consultants, Inc. Howard R. Scharlin, Trustee Northside of Woolbright Road, east of the L.W.D.D. E-4 Canal Master Plan Modification: Request to modify the previously approved master plan to subdivide out- building 3 into .895 acres, revise the outbuilding sizes (outbuilding 1 from 4,300 to 6,920 square feet; outbuilding 2 from 5,000 square) 1. Project: Agent: OWner: Location: City Manager Parker recommended that this item remain on the table since issues are outstanding. - 11 - VIII. DEVELOPMENT PLANS B.1 cc: Plan PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORJ Agenda Memorandum for April 4, 1995 city Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker city Manager Tambri J. HeYden-~j1:hL Planning and Zoning Director FROM: DATE: March 29, 1995 SUBJECT: Shoppes of Woolbright PCD - MPMD 95-001 Master Plan Modification ~ subdivide Tract C, redistribute square footage-within the three, Tract C outbuildings, relocate a driveway on the east side of S,W. 8th Street and permit a median cut in S,W, 8th Street for the relocated driveway, Please reflect the above-referenced request on the April 4, 1995 city commission agenda under Development Plans, Non-consent agenda as tabled. Staff has no additional information since the tabling of this item at the last City Commission meeting on March 21, 1995. This item was tabled so that a March 24, 1995 executive session could be held to discuss the proposal of a new settlement agreement between the city and Tradewinds Development Corporation which would replace the 1986 and 1989 agreements, Until.~tbe new ~greement is executed, it is recommended that this item remain tabled since as indicated within my attached, previous memoranda (Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No, 95-107 and No. 95-090), there are aspects of this master plan modification request that are not consistent with the 1986 and 1989 agreements. Again, these aspects are a fast food restaurant with drive-through window; addition of a third, actually forth if the northern-most driveway is not deleted as specified in the 1990 Barton-Aschman traffic study, driveway on the east side of S.W. 8th Street within the PCD and addition of a median cut within S,W, 8th Street. It should also be noted that in addition to the conclusions drawn in the referenced 95-090 staff report, approval of the subject master plan modification should be conditioned upon reflection on the revised master plan of a note indicating the one story, 35 foot height limit on buildings within the PCD. This note is missing from the master plan, yet specified in the 1989 agreement, tjh Attachments xc: Central File A:TradMPTa ,., ~ .... PLANNING AND ZONING DEPAR'n MEMORANDUM NO. 95-107 Agenda Memorandum for March 21, 1995 City Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker City Manager FROM: --- I Tambr i J. Heyden ')lJ Planning and Zoning Director SUBJECT: March 16, 1995 Shoppes of Woo~bright PCD - MPMD 95-001 Master Plan Modification subdivide Tract C, redistribute square footage-within the three outbuildings located on Tract C, relocate a driveway on the east side of S.W. 8th Street and make a medican cut in S.W. 8th Street for the relocated driveway. DATE: Please place the above-referenced request on the March 21, 1995 City Commission agenda under Development Plans, Non-consent agenda. DESCRIPTION: This is a request to amend the previously approved master plan for the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD, located at the northeast corner of Woolbright Road and the E-4 Canal. The changes include approval to subdivide Tract C to create outbuilding 3 on a .895 acre property, revise the outbuilding sizes (outbuilding 1 from.~,300 to 6.920 square feet, outbuilding 2 from 5,000 to 5,755 square-feet and outbuilding 3 from 4,300 to 2,625 square feet), add a driveway on the east side of S.W. 8th Street, 400 feet north of Woolbright Road, relocate the exi.sting driveway on the east side of S.W. 8th Street, from 290 feet to 260 feet north of Woolbright Road and provide a median cut on S. W. 8th Street for the relocated driveway. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board, with a 5-1 vote, recommended denial of this request. The basis for the denial was that the proposed changes were not consistent with the court ordered stipulation agreements. TJH/pb c:ccmtg321.shp 7.B.l SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT PCD MASTER PLAN HODIFIeATION ......~ .... .. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-090 *REVISED MARCH 13, 1995 TO: Chairman and Members Planning and Developemnt Board THRU: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Michael E. Haag Zoning and site Development Administrator DATE: March 10, 1995 SUBJECT: shoppes of Woolbright PCD - File No. MPMD 95-001 Master plan modification (driveway, median cut and shift in outparcel sizes and boundaries) NATURE OF REQUEST eeL Consultants, Inc., agent for Howard R. Scharlin, trustee of the property, is requesting approval to modify the previously approved master plan for the shoppes of woolbright PCD. The 31.99 acre planned commercial development zoned property, approved for 284,620 square feet of commercial/retail development, is located on the north side of Woolbright Road and east of the L.W.D.D. E-4 canal, The proposed changes, described in the attached letter from CCL Consultants, dated February 14, 1995 (see Exhibit "A") are itemized below. In addition to the changes stated in the letter of submittal, a second driveway is requested located on the east side of s. W. 8th street, approximately 400 feet north of the south property line of the PCD (see Exhibit liB" - proposed master plan): .......~ Subdivision of Tract C to make outbuilding 3 a separate ,895 acre outparcel. Tract C is located at the northeast corner of S.W. 8th street and Woolbright Road and south of the main entrance into the Home Depot. 1. * ') ... . Change in the size of the outbuilding 3 from a one-story, 4,300 square foot building to a one-story, 2,625 square foot drive-through, fast food restaurant. A conditional use application, as required by the zoning code, is in progress for a drive-through, fast food restaurant as the use of this outbuilding. 3. Change in the building area of outbuilding 2 from 5,000 square feet to 5,755 square feet. 4. Change in the building area of outparcel 1 from 4,300 square feet to 6,920 square feet. * 5. Relocation of the existing driveway located on the east side of S.W. 8th Street, 30 feet south, from 290 feet to 260 from the south property line of the PCD. 6. A9,dition of a driveway ,on the east side of S.W. 8th street, approximately 400 feet north of the south property line of the PCD. This driveway was requested on a previous master plan modification that was tabled by the City eommissionj therefore it has been added to this request. BACKGROUND The Shoppes of Woolbright pen is part of a November 6, 1986 and January 24, 1990 stipulated settlement agreement between the City and Tradewinds Development corporation. The City Commission ratified the settlement agreement by approving a master plan modification on May 15, 1990 that depicted the applicable conditions of the January 24, 1990 stipulation and settlement agreement (see Exhibit "C" - master plan pursuant to the 1990 stipulated set tlemen t agreement), The agreement vested the proj ect for traffic, \'1ater and sewer, so that no time extensions for 2 To: planning and Development Board March 9, 1995 concurrency would ever be required, prior to build-out of the property, The settlement agreement approved a maximum of 320,000 square feet, to include the uses and layout depicted on Exhibit "CII - the 1990 settlement master plan, However, the 1990 master plan reflects only 315,580 square feet. Since the original settlement agreement, the following master plan modifications have been submitted for review: 1, October of 1989 request to include the addition of a building materials s~ore (Home Depot) which included 102,250 square feet of retail and a 19;375 square foot garden center, The total square footage for the PCD remained unchanged at 315,580 square feet. The City Commiss ion approved this request on November 21, 1989. 2, May of 1991 - request to include the following: a. Addition of a new driveway onto Woolbright Road, located west of S.W. 8th street; b. Change in use ~nd size of the outparcel at the northwest corner of woolbright Road and S,W. 8th Street from 4,000 square feet of retail commercial to a 1,250 square foot gas station (this portion of the request was withdrawn by the applicant, from the submittal); ~~ Change in size, number of stories and designation of use of the outparcel at the northeast corner of Woolbright Road and S.W. 8th Street from a 4,300 square foot retail building to a two-story, 6,000 square foot bank with drive-through; d, Addition of another driveway from S.W. 8th Street to the shopping center outparcels located on the east side of S.W. 8th Street; e. Relocate southward the approved driveway located cn the east side of S.W. 8th street that leads to the shopping center outparcels; and f. Eliminate the north access aisle connection between the outparcels located on the east side of S.W. 8th street and the Home Depot site. The modifications to square footage resulted in a net increase of 1,700 square feet, thereby increasing the total square footage for the PCD from 315,580 to 317,280 square feet (within the limit allowed by the 1990 settlement agreement), This request was presented to the Planning and Zoning Board (now known as the Planning and Development Board) on August 13, 1991. The Board recommended approval of the request, with the exception of the additional driveway on Woolbright Road, The minutes from the August 20, 1991 and September 19, 1991 City commission meetings state that the request was tabled at the request of the City Attorney because of a pending motion in the Tradewinds case and that the Ci ty Attorney wished to confer with counsel for Tradewinds on the issue, A review of city records indicate the request was not removed from the table. ., oJ , Harcl1 of 1993 - request to include the addition of 8,745 square feet to the garden center at the home Depot. The garden center increased from 19,375 square feet to 28,120 square feet, Pursuant to the 1990 settlement agreement, the square footage of the garden center is not included as part of /l J- ~ -' 3 To: Planning and Development "Board March 9, 1995 the retail gross leasable area. The request included adjusting property lines to accommodate the expansion and the total square footage of the project remained at 315,580. On April 20, 1993 the City Commission approved the 8 745 square foot expansion subject to staff comments, and on August 10, 1993 the Planning and Development board approved a waiver of platting for the adjusted property lines in connection with the e:<pans ion. 4, March of 1993 - request to include the following: , a. Subdivision of Tract B to ~reate a ,957 acre outparcel, Tract B is that portion of the PCD that is located on the west side of S,w. 8th street; b, Change in use and size of the outparcel at the northwest corner of woolbright Road and S.W. 8th street from 4,000 square feet of retail commercial to a 3,040 square foot gas station (resurrection of the portion of the 1991 request that was withdrawn by the applicant); c, Add two new driveways into the proposed service station outparcel - one on S, W. 8th street and the other on Woolbright Road; d, Allow a canopy over the gasoline pumps to encroach the setbacks due to a difference in the service station regulations in effect in 1986 vs. the service station regulations in effect in 1993; and "-.- e, Reduce the building square footage specified on the master plan for Tract B from 62,000 to 55,040 square feet. with this request, the total square footage of the PCD decreased 6,960 square feet from 315,580 to 308,620, On April 20, 1993 the eity Commission approved the request, subject to staff comments. As a result of the traffic evaluation of the proposed service station use, the square footage on Tract B decreased 24,000 square feet from a total of 55,040 square feet (52 I 000 commercial/retail plus 3,040 convenience store/gasoline sales) to 31,040 square feet (28,000 commercial/retail plus 3,040 convenience store/gasoline sales) , Therefore, the total square footage of the PCD decreased 24,000 square feet from 308,620 to 284,620 square feet. ANALYSIS Changes in Planned Commercial Development (PCD) master plans are reviewed consistent with, Section 6.F.13,b, of Appendix A - Zoning as follows: b, "Modifications to approved plans which resul t in 3.n increase of less than ten (10) per cent in measurable impacts as determined by including any changes in traffic generated, water consumed or sewage to be collected will require review and recommendation the planning and zoning board and final approval by the city commiss ion, The city commission decisiQn to approve, approve with modifications or deny, shall be predicated upon a finding of consistency with the comprehensive plan and a finding that any such increase will not result in a negative imp~ct on infrastructure delivery systems or the surrounding area in general. It is the intent of this ......, ...:.) 4 To: Planning and Development Board March 9, 1995 section that all additional impacts be mitigated. ,." Based on the documentation provided, the changes to the three outparcels would generate in excess of a ten (10) per cent increase in water consumed and sewage collected, if the approved outparcels are evaluated against the proposed outparcels. An increase of only 2,8% in water consumed and sewage collected results if the proposed outparcels are evaluated against the entire peD water and sewer impacts, In either scenario, the utility Department does not have an objection to the analysis provided and has not indicated that the increase will have a negative impact on the infrastruture delivery systems. A slight increase in pervious area will result in a minimal, positive impact on th~ PCD drainage. with respect to traffic, the traffic information submitted indicates that the traffic generated by the three outparcels will generate less than a ten (10) percent change. This information has been forwarded to Palm Beach County. The results of the review by the County have not been received at the time of this report, The following is an evaluation of each of the proposed changes listed on page one of this ~eport: 1. Subdivision of Tract C to make outbuilding 3 a separate outparcel and the redistribution of square footage among the outparcels As indicated in the stipulation settlement agreement, this is acceptable. Platting or a waiver of '~-platting. (at the determination of the City Engineer) to subdivide this parcel is required. As required, outparcels shall be self-sufficient with respect to lot size, setbacks, parking and other PCD zoning district requirements. 2. Relocation of the existing driveway on the east side of S.W. 8th street, south of the main entrance into the shopping center (Home Depot) - One entrance, in addition to the main entrance, was allowed pursuant to the 1990 settlement agreement. This eXisting driveway is the additional driveway referenced in the agreement. The proposed location of this additional driveway is closer to the original position (centrally located) identified in the Barton-Aschman traffic report, upon which the traffic conditions of the 1990 settlement agreement were based. 3, Addition of a second driveway on the east side of S.W, 8th street, between Woolbright Road and the main entrance to the shopping center (Home Depot) - As mentioned in previous item =2, the number of driveways is specifically limited in the 1990 settlement agreement. The addition of a second driveway is inconsistent with the 1990 settlement agreement, Since the Barton-Aschman report does not require an additional driveway to be added, it could be argued that this driveway is not needed and that safety and level of service are not impaired without it, Furthermore, this type of access des ign is contrary to the intent and purpose of a PCD, which is to provide for a planned (not piece-meal) , programmed series of development operations I designed as a whole through integration of principle buildings and ou~buildings that are linked via common use of access and infrastructure and similar architecture and other aesthetic elements, specifically with respect to access, this additional driveway defeats the purpose of requiring internal ~ccess roads and driveways to serve parcels within a planned develcpment. It should also be noted that the Barton-Aschman report stated 4 ..., - 5 To: Planning and Development Board March 9, 1995 that the driveway on the east side of S,W, 8th street located nc.rth of the eXisting main entrance driveway was to be de:eted. The proposed master plan still reflects this driveway as being approved. 4, Median cut in S,W. eth street If approved, this new intersection would capture much of the traffic anticipated and designed to be received by the main driveway that is located at the entrance to Home Depot. The main driveway is centrally located for the major portion of the retail uses located on the east side of S.W. 8th street. Since the Barton-Aschman report did not recommend a median cut, it could be argued that the proposed median cut is no~ consistent with the traffic report referenced in the 1990 settlement agreement and therefore not needed or possibly affecting level of service. Therefore, if the median cut is approved, it is recommended that a new analysis of the turning movements be submitted to determine the impact the median cut will have on S, W. 8th street and Woolbright Road. Also, the proposed median cut would cause the east driveway into the site to become a major driveway which requires a one hundred (100) foot throat; the distance from the property line to a parking space or an access aisle. This would significantly impact the parking design of outbuilding 3, CONCLUSION This tiquest was reviewed by the Technical Review Committee (TRC) on February 28, 1995 and the committee raised no objections at the time, However; -the committee did not have technical data regarding the impact the median cut and additional driveway would have on the surrounding roadways or the project itself. If this driveway and median cut are approved by the Commission, the Police Department recommends that north and south deceleration lanes be required at the cut to avoid congestion from motorists slowing down to make turns at this location ( see Exhibit "D" Police Department Memorandum No. 95-0121) . It is also recommended that if any changes are approved by the Commission that are not reflected, or are contrary to, the proposed master plan, that three copies of a revised master plan be submi tted to the Planning and Zoning Department, prior to submittal of any future PCD requests. The Planning and Zoning Department is not making a specific recommendation on this request since components of the request are inconsistent with the latest settlement agreement. Deviation from this agreement are viewed as policy decisions of the Commission, tjh Attachments Xc: Central File A:WoolPCD " - ~ ~...~...,.... E X H I BIT A , ' r () '-'" CC~ONSULTANTSt INC. Con.ultlng Englnee,. m Surveyo,. Planner. ' 2200 PARK CENTRAL BLVD" N, SUITE 100, POMPANO BEACH, FL 33064, (305) 974-2200 · FAX (305) 973-2688 February 14, 1995 Hand Delivery Ms. Tambri Heyden Planning Director CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 ReI SHOPPBS OF WOOLBRIGHT PCD Boynton Beach, Florida CCL Project No. 3101 Dear Ms. Heyden: Enclosed herewith please find the following: 1. Twelve (12) signed and sealed prints of the revised master plan for the above-referenced project. 2 . A chec)t made payable to the ci ty of Boynton Beach in the amount of $500.00. ~...~ 3. Letter of Authorization form owner for CCL Consultants, Inc. to act as_agent for this matter. Please be advised that we are herein SUbmitting for master plan amendment for the above-referenced project. We are proposing to amend the existing master plan as follows: A. outparcel 1 will be revised from 4300 SF to 6920 SF. B. outparcel 2 will be revised from 5000 SF to 5755 SF. C. outparcel 3 will be revised from a 2-story 6000 SF bank to a 1-story 2625 SF Taco Bell Fast Food Restaurant with a drive- thru lane. D. The locations of the driveways for these outparcels onto S.W. 8th Street will be revised from what is presently shown on the existing master plan. In addition, we are proposing a median cut in the S.W. 8th Street median which aligns with one of the proposed relocated driveways as well as prior-approved driveway location on the wes~ side of S.W. 8th street. I --. I -- Ms. Tambri aeydeD eCL project No. 3101 February 14, 1995 Paqe two We respectfully request that this proposed master plan amendment be placed on the next Technical Review eommittee agenda and thusly on the next available planning & Development Board a8 well as City commission Agenda. Should you have any questions or need any additional information, '"', please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, panile, Jr., P.E., P.L.S. ject Manager LRC/kag Enclosure cc: Mike Morton, Tradewinds Group Eduardo Carcache, P.E., ,CKE Group, Inc. '.~-<..- 00 CCl CONSULTANTS, INC. ,7 .." 'WIll -~~ E1{\l1.1\1.'t 1\ ';r _....n 5~!~ i:!~ ~~.6 ;i.... ~. ~. ~lIIi Q.... 1I.... ;!al w'" w.... ::I! y.", w"~ ~!;g ".. !O .. .. (II n ClI iii .. o:il < ~ COSO L,.--/ C~~ : i. m < :;:a:t .Ar ,A Of .. i r- ' ___m ' '" t;... < ~ I 0; ~ I : --.r. ~;i' .,. ~.~.;...,. ,; ~"liI !: ~ _ .:. I \,., .~ ~ !11=;:0 ~ ~ ;m m~....1 -:~:'~j~; w ~ =- ........ ~. .. / . :5 m \~..:.. ~~~F'.. _,,~ / I ";8 ~ I .\. -'lli;4;~ "n I / ,--- .~ .:0 3: .' (, ~h - r :0 , / .' a -: i \ . - - g. ' ~ : \ '\ "I : ~.:Jl!.'!..-n~ -------..~ed! - / : .. I . ---.. -- ...,-...;f-; . ~;"I' ~,jri~IDP".~r.~- '-"_lr~"[7 I" \ g!. w;.~ - - J..-- / ~ ' , · \ = , t - ' ti---';' __ /' -~;: i'f 1'1 /1 j'/ II ' _..... I '1" IQ -u= ' F. I /' /1 :: .. g ; ,1 - L, ~, ,..' If I 'I ~ ~ .. .. I"" \ '. /' -".. ' ifl[ , ( ,~o' 1 ': I ; .- I , ........ - , . . .. k:~ s = <=':'1 . = ...g... ... ..~ Q: ,I ..J' -. ;Cln 1: ;".. . ., ~ --::--~'l'-":"""'--' '~ :=U ' , /~,-- '.. ~ ., ~..~--- :..ii ....... i~~ - .. .. : ~ w z : : .. i ~ ..-0 ;"'I~ ~ . & .. .. .~~ "!;Q .~.. !l ...e" ~~ I.... il= ..~ .. I :II .. .. .. ~;I I~l ~~I s'" :il i ~ i -.;1 ::1. ....~ i~l III.... ."J ..E! ~~. . .. ....... il! : ..~ =8~ :~z .. .. j!: 5n :~ =; 08 ~il g jl ~ ~l!l l!m " i:: ~ - - lia !II ;~ ;ll ~' "JI!~ in i~ .. ! , ..t"" A ~ , .~Of~9~-? ~~~ir~/ ~~~---;:; "01" ,4oc." ~ ::::::::--- - '-~ ---- -------: II: 0 " .." --- - 'r~ --,!41 ~.-: \l r-_ ~~_ ~ff I): ,.r-.. ~f \','\ h. -. - I . --;c~ - :~ ,~ .. -) - ...!I ' ~ ,\ \ ~-; \{~~r! 77. :-ll~r~jl3f~: t ~y~~= : 7,~< ,,'~n'-.' 1 I '~' .. , ..... __ _ =+' d. . .1 I ".0 I' '- .. - - - ..,.. ", I ' /--~ -..!U' '10",1 I ,,-......... -i :- - ..' '" - - /' iO Iii 1 - - . ~ ... - I ....:.---:-_/ ....' -- , r ,\1 \ 11\ l--~--: a:. ~' . -Lj D V.;r .-_d , ~g i [, n' I" If it" ~~ ~c ,;.; ~\ ji-l'l J ,'\~=-A~ '-'-. . . ['I! __ ., i ~ ,\ i\') II i ~I "\. - I;: / : I. · '1 ~-; 2 r, I J ,. . ~. ~ \ :::' ~ = r.r ~b- \_ - - ~ I it --.- - ! .J ~ ~ 'I.:" 1 .:!I,I" i \,.., If If II II~___1f U ,~/,---r /. - f' .1 ( ,.- l f" I ,\. ,- \ -- - i/?-~~- ! ~i' ('~ l'i . -,1"',1 r" "'1' \ " \ "c;",ill ~i< ~ IIII . r ~ I ::!iI I' "?\ - .- ==\ - = l.f / , , .., ,-:\.\ ~ I ~I :0 j ~ 1 ~ r -.-- -.s_."".....,,_....MI.I!:-' I I ~ ',1,11, \I~\ I, 51 \. a j ';,! .~, .',!,. - - -- - - .. -- I I;J' (. t-- '\ ~ '\ I,d ' ~f" ~~ I p .. ~ I i:" : -" I' \, ' , ,I ~ ; I I I II ~'I:'; 11 "- I 1.,..0. I !; ) 1.1, I., r---"'\ I' ;~. Ii " l ~Ij~ ' lJ, 'L ,,/I:,..'.i:'I\':..,. . ~ :;.. ,! -- -~. i;IJ~~ (II ill ~::-' J ; ii I: ,;, .:~.t- -- ' ,_::V I ", .' I" i: !:, I t ,,=-d ~ .. ~ -'-':i ',_, "--' '.___~!jIJ P " ' ' i=t'L' ...~~~- -i- ~1~.jJ~- .-J--== L ~ I , . I -~ ~i I - - .......:- ~ .. - I t - - - - - - - -- "". u.; um,.-H - - - - - ~. -- -- - - - - n~~ - - ~ ..,7"_. ,ro" oS j III I' = I · :. s ~ ii.h S.C,L,. RAILROAD :- I I ~ ".....o~u . . HI, i-." ~ ~ ~. .1 : . I n ;:5 oil '!l 2 i ~ j! ~ r- ~ u: ~ ~ - e5 ~:ifi :!i .z .. -4 ;!l ~~ ~ z m : :a it ~ .. .. .. .-- Iff HI Iyg .i( In . In ~~m Hi IW "il!j.";I !"Cill'"I.. :;~:;~Ii ~i:~~~i'" as.;:!!1 ..i5;::~"" jZfII ...... ~~~E..~~. ........&1 ,.IDz" z!;l!!:..S12; .,...,,1 I ~;!i~~. c,&It 1110"'", .,.....n ....OJ. a~i~~"'1 m-tRaml... a~::!~". ' 2~io;~J :"I"'=llj ;;2.i;~it z,..::,n.ila n"'$!.... !:....ozooC "ZO."ii!; !lz.._;lli 65.:;;"'= z .._ Wt=al::t!! ~. ztrlF ~~ i~ .. z .~iZ . 0 , I~ it m m ." t III &.1 ! , it.. ,I l~ I: I iI .- .. , . -: Ii i I [ . i "I.a-r- it.. J ~ ; II ~ a IF!! ~ ;1 .. CD : ~ .. -.. -.. m:D 101...... . ~ .... w .... ~ :,: t : : ~ :1; . III , ~ III . .. .. ~'I~ 411 ~ . . :t .. w - ~I~ r;~ ~ -1= :: ... ; '1 ~ ~ ;: :: Iii ! I :iI i i i ~ .. . ~ .. :01 ~ /: ~ ~ i i i B I ii .. ;: Ii ~ i" I : i i ;1- ~ i i ~ _"1- 0....... .. .. ....! '. .. ! I ~ a /: i .. .. F ;:~.~i ~e:: =~i;; ,#~: · r; ~ .. .. ~~ . .. illl' .,Jr~IB.I'fI'Hlr'"." rr'll n; I . ,I: .i! ';IJ:j .:.",/ I r11 . J.' II' .. .1..1"1. '1' I, I, II I;:~:I%!~.,;;~I! ~i: I, I' ;1 ;:dI1J~,~ ~,.I!I~1:II';r .11,11,1 '1.;II",:!i:ltl~ '1 ~ 'I~ \, I :: !1.;IIIIJJ~~:;~r.;i~ II;. ,I h I '1:1~ll'I"I" 'U: ~I'I " I' 1:~I:I:"'! 1I,!ll!illl .:1 I I .. .l! I,. .!t .. II! nl:tiili:I!~'lliit !ilt Ii III !::I'lIll!ii ,ri:h:'1 ll~ II ~I. h. ...lIh.,..C :.I.. IS In :'111"'1"" ~, 'I'llrl'lw ~i Ii ", ,I' .,.. 'il" 'I' I( l . ;',;lhl;:111 lil~' ~I. I, /1';'\'1'11' .",,!t." II ,\'1.11' 10111,11 ,I ! I :jj;h, ;i;lli'll,:,hl:j Iii' r I i HII!'ll:!f;I!l1Ii I~JI.m.:~ ,I ~ i l\:!llli'!I!!ii!!, illi::!~I~, jlllr' . 1';iitli!u.I:i~:, 'r:r.I~r.:1 !. I I hi'll!I.JI !l;HII",1 ~Iil' iI ,.-I,"I'I'II'lmP'II::'lJlj.:.,II' I :1;,'l!U!.;111 1)1!1'1iI' riii'i; , h .JI."I., .".. : .C. ,I 1Ilr- ~o ..0 ...~ .- .' CD ~ Selle 1 . .a 0.11 'U 2&1 .a Or"," It' t1i&Jl F... No nos' I" .121 , "'_.... 1S-3. 5_'~oI ~i: Ill> :D" ! . w m V"J ~4 ~~ .::;;' I ~ 1 J 1 c;o; SHOPPES OF WOOLBR,~~T ~ pee 1'$",_- . . . . ; . r . "'. , _ BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA ,., "-,;":'/ , .,,~. ,=~ ,.,. MASTIR"-AN.. ~ . _/ .....0: -.r~~/' Kilday b A..oe,a,.. lllndSCi1pe Archllccls/Phlltn~rs 1551 Foru", Pllee Su,te l00A West p.lm ane," , Florodl 3340' (30516895522 PROPOSED i() I ....; ,""" ....,..~ E,X\l1.B1.'t C II .'Ii" , :!l:!l~, ...,., ~-... It hi: :_1= =:;11 J5!j ~a: j'~ I o;s .... .;1 . I .. :a ;!I!:~ ~~~~ =:s; 't!:=6 !~:; ~i"' i...~ ~a; ..:.:. ~llj 'l'!.. ~.;!l ..oJ -.. Si .. .. a . . " en n QI is' -; I CII q Selle 1 . aD 0'1' ]} 211/ ga Or.Jw" B... DAP l="Il! /'.lo 4211 Or~w'''Q No 85-34 S heel ----1......- :; I "A . ----- .-;a ::1. .... ~ li' e;! ..;1 ";OS ~i, . , ,. '".." i!: o ' ..-~ ..8' i;i -... Si" ..n :~ 1= ,. ; ~ ~ n III III III I~ ." -.. ~. ;0 'a~ ;1 III ~: i . .j L(,. -q ~ ~ 1- .J ;~ - ~ ~ i: ; 1 I ~ ~ : II!I~ 1115 S .! M ~ 'as ijlllE I ,,-... II i II -' \ If :a.... . j5S!::: -~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ !!Ili 1lr:~~1~~m~ ~J~ ~I II t11"~~!i~,..,,~1 jl! II I ;' ;lilm~~III$I~~ !I~ II ,I i:!Ii'i'~~~1.;! ;!:t J' It': jl~!Ir, iI!~"'i~ tr~ H I .I~.I: ,.", 3i" J' !i:!J!'III~~if :If' I I! l'I~~II!I!!I!'i~ l;B ~ · I, 'l'I'qllll~ji'~"~1 ~:I b I' ;~ hi ~!l,;ti::I, :Iii II ! p. !~rj~~:J!~!i I~ i i !i ,l;:',~,r,:mi;;' ~rd!~!,~ 'I .. "III 'I' ",If II J ! ' 'II ;,~." "1 I.!\. . ~ I i i!ill~II~Il: Irill~dl'll~ II I . i'~ili'IIIIJl:iII'Cli:JI'II~1i " '. I 1::I~1 U'I"I!t'ild'I':;'I~""r.II' , I" . , ~&: I' ~.f ~+lrJ' . 1- '11'-1""'" I 'I' !'h II' 'j.:ffi'; 1;:!111r . :I" . 1i~lhn" I. .~.. I' '"lib, ;~_ 2JI,~I~ 9H!b.ih .i .... .. :: ,:1 iI :I 1111 il ! ! ~ ~ h!Phh~ iI E I. ~~~! ==~! "'l ... ; io l" :: 9..~. ;~:I ! 5 '!II ~ . . .:::;' I": I oJ' I':: SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT - ~~. 'peD _ ,~ '. BOYNOTbN BE~H, F70RIDA /'/-- ~ - MASTER PLAN' \ Kilday & Auociatlls Land.cape IIrch'ICC15/Planner5 1551 Forum Place Suile 10011 We.1 Palm Beach, Flonda 33401 '(30516895522 ." 'WI ^-- E)tU1.B1.'t D /3 L.V\.IJ-\IIUI" MAt-' SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT P.C.[ , ,I I I I ' J I I; L J I t '....../ /. - - J " - - - I L.-.........l IR3':"~ lG~-:1i~':tJtLi.;r I"'; "",;' ,J,;,:~~~~.~~..~ - '~fI~ h l~:~l . \,"'-L ';1-- ".. \ ~v ",,- III =' ~ I T 1 1 "':\,. '- :1 _Ll..J\'""",:' ~ i (.J, : ( _ r I ,'Jlji! lllV';<" ~tA - : 7: . ""'-'\....ol! ~ - I 'D I 1 / ; '~I I I ~ "l\ eLl - ; H _: ' ~ ~~~ l HLL ~ -: Ir ' ~.A '........ I III TT \ ,,; II :~~ ~ - ... .. pee I ~ ~ r{~/ . II _1111., ~ ~,,~ rON ~~AC':f.r-"'.;~ 1'. , ,.-.: ~~~-::;;~: ~ '"F? "1 ~- .':.. 'i !'l " ;"'\f1LLJ~Jl~.lId:;~I'D:~l~ \ ov'/ ......-(,. :, ~ I I II I I rr, Flll~~ . ~ \. ". ,.. , ..~~ 'R3- : 1 T.ll" 'r-t,,~'? - '-:j: .~ " ~ II" 1fT l/~ ~ i\ ~ ca j i.,...1 ~E -al~" .. {!J;l;.... ~1iTllli .J.WJr. :::; ":: :' ::; TT T -R ' IIll!l111JIII "'-YI ~q ::."w.......:~' ~ 0 ~~ ' :~. < ==- In lIIIIlIDDD I' 1I1'IUII "'Ill . ........ L- HeM v rr "1~. 1'" ~ ~ I "jU' II " "If t- ~ C ' ;1 · . ;.. i. L..-"" I _ I J ":ITTTlJf ' I II ,. f,:' ~rr "''I''' 1"11. ~tK :1 I , 11 tS :;; tT.l.. \ '------ m illm ~ Ill' ," '. ~ ;1 .1 I 11'1,1- r~c.""", ~ .:."C. . ,\ ' <' ' ~ ~ i,~~ ,~ r ' ~~\ \ >,.i~<li?t;~~~':..~~~ L It>\\ P~D , l~f ~ '/'.A.."'.... ,:.~~ ,- .~~ r- [ LU1.5.0 :- I . ,~/:~ ~~ ............/ ,', ',;" /.... '/ '" ~ ',: , ~ ,- --' " ,. .. ,'- ( .. , >\,.,' '- i IG HT " rrr"': ,..... /A ../",., ,,/ /.4 9\, "w "",LBR :~.;)~~' ~r-...",~~.. ",., . ':~d~~~ '~LACE" " ~ ',,- ~ //'~~~ ~ '" ~..~ f, \ L. ~:~.. /' ," "t.. ,,' \\C;,'~, \ ,,', .,<~: .,.. ".. = ,: ..., (\\ "., u: ~~' , , . ":\\ ~~l. .. .....s.c..j! ! 'T"'"" ~' \ ~ \ '., " . , T 'YJ .. ~ ~ i 1+ ___ i "'" _,_ __~:.~~ ~ I~ '--t ' ( ~~ : ~ lfTP "'AlEC -I I ;rm ~~ ,,J...-J). 1\.bjJ~ ~:: rC SITE!j [,[J~ [, )T~ T '. T ~~'-' L..--"- . A. ~ 006' '~l ~.I'G~ - .,' ,,~ ,-'- ! -,... R'3 ~ ~.::1"1 C3: ' ($ IV .~ /." ....~t! t v'~ ~()(".8/lIt;HT ""oJNff~ ~ " ' " J f-lll " i ~IRJTrll...'1 ''II ,17L1..... :/ f- ... - I I ~ 10. C ~:< I To' ,. ~,' ^ ""7 ~ ".1 . ~, f- I.., f) . I S:. J' ..<< ~~ l.l :.:' ltI~ iJ,JfL.. ~- --.J: .. . ,-< ~ /Y r': 'i I . ~ rrm .. . ~x y; ~ "J/#. . , . 1 " , Jtt } / ;: '! AEC ,~~> >- I ~~ }-~~' ~ IJI D~... R - N IN , J ..::::: ~ \J -. 1'1 I I,~"'~"< "'~~ ~~~' "~~.' , I:' .~ ~~~'x x~:t...Y/ .. -- -. ~ ~ ~ ,F'~ .I. ~~~ ~ ~~~', l~... .:1) j/ 1 ~J ~l~~,- rvv "\.~/ \' -=~ (~t-7J i ':::1-- ~ ~ "-(... ~ ~... '/ i 'j. :Z--~~ -p... " i :(~D ,II,. . ~ "'-J. rr >>' .['-..,' G..~fI' ~ :=J 'Y~~,.Ty1.~~~~~~~-*~:'l ~W~Ul~~ afJ~,~ . -..........--~ . 1'-.' z: /' Jl Tl I U. ~::: ~ ( / " . fI/I/, I lEE ~ 'I ~ 1~:3 '.0. 1/8 MILESl, ../' T ]: / .... Wi t;-n =- 1)=-.." , ~ ~ T - ~ I , 0' W2 R ,,+- - -.1- :11"'(': L [' 1"0 400800 FEE I~' t ... f-- - ---, '[I I ' ('/,..ANN/Nt; Ot;,pr. 3~'5.f t-i., .' ;' E .~ tf.. ,.lJt,tAi L- ';/\'/ ,! r j IT ,. ~ '. \ \, \ I II I It ~ f nl;l~~lf-l;:'~" -E~" Ilrn-m I ~. 11111 U ;-::.:::~ 1\11 - · - El [: -Iii R == = E = =- C = " ..~' - ~ , 'I ow ~., 1 , C''1 . rDIITill -r:mill I - ;;;; - I \ ~ ~ f--- t- Ul Rr r" T rn ~e! m~ 11111 ~ ~ l! .I!!~ \!ffiIElIffi ,111 '+1 ~I . I ~I , -I TI1T,i,! II ',..;.I .~ PUt" \ ~. u~~ r! ~'_ ~ 1[ ~l . --, f] ~ ~ / p-~~ ~-- ~.-- J 7~..., (r' fJA(6 --- ~~t - -- ~1 ~- \ \ w ~ BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT Office of Professional Standards To: From: Date: Re: Tambri Heyden. Directo~ Lt. James Cwnmings ~ 28 February 1995 Shoppes of Woolbright, P,C,D. TRC Memo # 95-0121 The comments that I have regarding this project concern S,W, 8 Street, and the curb cuts made north of the entrance at Woolbright. Althougb I have no problems with the curb cuts themselves, I would like to see deceleration lanes placed at tbe sights of these cuts, in order to facilitate motorists, and to keep the roadway free from unnecess8IY congestion. ......~ m muwrn~ FE"" .... 8 II it'i; 1) .: ! L I ,', PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. //f MINUTES - CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA MARCH 21. 1995 should vote on this matter without the applicant making a presentation. Mayor Hanmening pointed out that their current concurrency in all of their master plan approvals expired months ago. Therefore, they are in arrears. Motion Vice Mayor Matson moved to table Items VIII.B.1, VIII.B.2 and VIII.B.3 until the April 18, 1995 City Commission meeting. Mayor Pro Tem Bradley seconded the motion which carried 4-1. Mayor Harmening cast the dissenting vote. City Attorney Cherof requested that Item VIII.B.4 be tabled so l~ql..)i~b~;i~e ;.-:tD -/...;:'.'.- discussed at a shade meeting this Friday at 3:00 p.m. He added Item X.D.1 (Update on the Finizio Appeal). 2. Adoption Motion Vice Mayor Matson moved to approve the agenda as amended. Mayor Pro Tem Bradley seconded the motion which carried 5-0. II. ADMINISTRATIVE A. Appointments to be ..de Appointment To Be Made II Bradl ey II Brad 1 ey III Jaskiewicz I I Bradl ey II Bradl ey III Jaskiewicz I Rosen III Jaskiewicz IV Matson Mayor Harmeni ng I Rosen IV Matson I Rosen II I Jask i ewi cz Mayor Hanmeni ng I Rosen Regl Board Al t Education Advisory Board Alt Board of Adjustment Alt Cemetery Board Alt Education Advisory Board Alt Board of Adjustment Reg Nuisance Abatement Board Reg Civil Service Board Alt Education Advisory Board Reg Education Advisory Board Reg Planning & Development Alt Code Enforcement Board Reg Senior Advisory Board Reg Education Advisory Board Reg Community Relations Board Alt Community Redev. Adv. Brd. Reg Children and Youth Adv. Brd. Reg Length of Term Expiration Date Term expires 4/95 TABLED 2 yr term to 4/96 TABLED 1 yr term to 4/95 TABLED Tenm expi~es 4/95 TABLED Term expires 4/97 TABLED Term expires 4/95 TABLED Term expires 4/95 TABLED Term expires 4/95 TABLED Term expires 4/95 TABLED Term expires 4/95 TABLED Term expires 9/97 TABLED Tenm expires 4/96 TABLED Tenm expires 6/95 TABLED Tenm expires 4/95 TABLED Tenm expires 8/95 TABLED Term expires 4/96 All tabled appointments were left on the table. Commissioner Rosen tabled his appointment to the Children and Youth Advisory Board. - 2 - MINUTES OF THE CITY COMMISSION MEETING HELD IN COMMISSION CHAMBERS, CITY HAlL, BOYNTON BEACH, flORIDA, ON TUESDAY, MARCH 21, ~99S, AT 6:30 P.M. PRESENT Edward Hanmening, Mayor Lynne Matson, Vice Mayor Matthew Bradley, Mayor Pro Tern Shirley Jaskiewicz, Commissioner Sidney Rosen, Commissioner Carrie Parker, City Manager James Cherof, City Attorney Sue Kruse, City Clerk I. OPENINGS A. Call to Order B. Invocation - James E. Henry - Deeper Life Fellowship Full Gospel Church C. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag Mayor Hanmening called the meeting to order at 6:31 p.m. James E. Henry of the Deeper Life Fellowship Full Gospel offered the invocation. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Mayor Hanmening. D. Agenda Approval 1. Additions, Deletions, Corrections Mayor Pro Tern Bradley tabled Item IX.B.1 (Authorization for Goal Setting Team Building for the City Commission and City Department Heads) until the next meeting. He felt this item should have the new mayor's input. He replaced this item with an update on the Poinciana Elementary School MaDnct, and added Item IX.B.2 (Update on the Funding for the Boynton Cornmun~ty Life Center). Vice Mayor Matson added Item IV.A.2 (Pennies fOr P.A.L.) and Item IV.A.3 (Easter Egg Hunt Extravaganza). She changed itera IX"A,2 to read, "Two Re-solutions Pertaining to Lawrence Road". She also added Item IX.A.3 (Florida League of Cities Legislative Session). Commissioner Rosen asked that Item III.C.3 be tabled. City Manager Parker asked Mark Law of the Utilities Department if there is a timetable on the Joint Participation Agreement. Mr. Law advised that a specific deadline was not given. City Manager Parker deleted Item III.B.3. She explained that this needs to be rebid because it is not a one-year extension for the same product. ~---.- - _7 ;Jht.: [......fI.~'; ~.;c City Manager Parker advised that she received a letter from Kilday & Associates, requesting that Items VIII.B.l, VIII.B.2 and VIII.B.3 be tabled until the April 18, 1995 meeting. Mayor Hanmening was not in favor of tabling these items. Vice Mayor Matson felt the Commission should honor the request to table because the letter states that an additional thirty days is needed to solidify timetables for development. In addition, she did not think the Commission --~-,. - ,,..-.----... .>t.. "'__'''' ,-", - 1 - PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTI MEMORANDUM NO. 95-107 VIII. DEVELOPMENT PLANS B.4 cc: Plan, Dev, Util Agenda Memorandum for March 21, 1995 City Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker City Manager Tarnbr i J. Heyden ~ -; Ii Planning and Zoning Director FROM: SUBJECT: March 16, 1995 Shoppes of Woolbright PCD - MPMD 95-001 Master Plan Modification subdivide Tract C, redistribute square footage within the three outbuildings located on Tract C, relocate a driveway on the east side of S.W. 8th Street and make a medican cut in S.W. 8th Street for the relocated driveway. DATE: Please place the above-referenced request on the March 21, 1995 Ci ty Commission agenda under Development Plans, Non-consent agenda. DESCRIPTION: This is a request to amend the previously approved master plan for the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD, located at the northeast corner of Woolbright Road and the E-4 Canal. The changes include approval to subdivide Tract C to create outbuilding 3 on a .895 acre property, revise the outbuilding sizes (outbuilding 1 from 4,300 to 6.920 square feet, outbuilding 2 from 5,000 to 5,755 square feet and outbuilding 3 from 4,300 to 2,625 square feet), add a driveway on the east side of S.W. 8th Street, 400 feet north of Woolbright Road, relocate the existing driveway on the east side of S.W. 8th Street, from 290 feet to 260 feet north of Woolbright Road and provide a median cut on S. W. 8th Street for the relocated driveway. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board, with a 5-1 vote, recommended denial of this request. The basis for the denial was that the proposed changes were not consistent with the court ordered stipulation agreements. TJH/pb c :ccmtg321. shp 1 .., ~ f_ 7.B.l SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT PCD MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION II PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-090 *REVISED MARCH 13, 1995 TO: Chairman and Members Planning and Developemnt Board THRU: Tambri J. Heyden planning and Zoning Director FROM: Michael E. Haag Zoning and Site Development Administrator DATE: March 10, 1995 SUBJECT: Shoppes of Woolbright peD - File No. MPMD 95-001 Master plan modification (driveway, median cut and shift in outparcel sizes and boundaries) NATURE OF REQUEST eeL Consultants, Inc., agent for Howard R. Scharlin, trustee of the property, is requesting approval to modify the previously approved master plan for the Shoppes of woolbright PCD, The 31.99 acre planned commercial development zoned property, approved for 284,620 square feet of commercial/retail development, is located on the north side of Woolbright Road and east of the L.W.D,D. E-4 canal. The proposed changes, described in the attached letter from CCL Consultants, dated February 14, 1995 (see Exhibit "A") are itemized below. In addition to the changes stated in the letter of submittal, a second driveway is requested located on the east side of S .1-/. 8th Street, approximately 400 feet north of the south property line of the peD (see Exhibit liB" - proposed master plan): 1, Subdivision of Tract C to make outbuilding 3 a separate ,895 acre outparcel. Tract C is located at the northeast corner of S,W, 8th Street and Woolbright Road and south of the main entrance into the Home Depot. * ') ... , Change in the size of the outbuilding 3 from a one-story, 4,300 square foot building to a one-story, 2,625 square foot drive-through, fast food restaurant. A conditional use application, as required by the zoning code, is in progress for a drive-through, fast food restaurant as the use of this outbuilding. 3. Change in the building area of outbuilding 2 from 5,000 square feet to 5,755 square feet. 4. Change in the bUilding area of outparcel 1 from 4,300 square feet to 6,920 square feet. * 5. Relocation of the existing driveway located on the east side of S,W. 8th Street, 30 feet south, from 290 feet to 260 from the south property line of the PCD. 6. A<ldition of a driveway on the east side of s. W. 8th Street, approximately 400 feet north of the south property line of the peD. This driveway was requested on a previous master plan modification that was tabled by the City Commission; therefore it has been added to this request. BACKGROUND The Shoppes of Woolbright pen is part of a November 6, 1986 and January 24, 1990 stipulated settlement agreement between the City and Tradewinds Development Corporation. The City Commission l-atified the settlement agreement by approving a master plan modification on May 15, 1990 that depicted the applicable conditions of the January 24, 1990 stipulation and settlement agreement (see Exhibit "e" - master plan pursuant to the 1990 stipulate~ set tlemen t agreement). The agreement vested the proj ect fOl- trafflc, t'1ater and se-V-ler, so that no time extensions for .. -( l/ ,., JO ~JEd SE papnl~ul ~ou sl Ja~ua~ UapJED aq~ JO aDe~ooJ aJEnbs aq~ '~uaWaaJDE ~uawal~~as 0661 aq~ o~ ~UEnSJnd '~aa~ a~Enbs O<:1'8~ o~ ~aaJ a_lEnDS SL('61 WO.1J paSEa_l~ul _la~ua; U;:.P_H?D aqJ, . ~odaa awoq aq~ '4E ~a~ua;) uap~ED aq:. 0'4 ~aaj a.1EnDs SvL '8 JO uOl~lPPE aq~ apnl~ul o~ ~sanba_l - [661 JO lP_H'YJ . ..... Co 'atqE'4 aq'4 WO~} paAow~~ ~ou SEM ~sanbaJ aq~ a'4E~lpu1 sp~o~aJ ~~l~ JO Ma1AaJ V 'anssl aq'4 uo spUlMapEJ.1 JO} lasuno~ q~lM Ja}uo~ o~ paqslM ~au~o~'4V ^~ l~ aq'4 '4Eq~ PUE aSE~ spulMapEJ.!. aq'4 ul u01~ow DUlPuad E }O aSnE;)aq AaUJO~~V A~ 1;) aq~ }O ~sanbaJ aq~ ~E patqE~ SEM '4-SanDaJ atp ~Eq~ a~E'4S SOU1'4-aaw UOlSS1WWO~ A~l~ 1661 '61 Jaqwa'4das PUE 1661 'O~ ~sn6nv aq'4 WOJ} sa~nu1w aqJ, 'PEOH ~qo1JqIooM UO ~EMaA1Jp IEu01~lPPE aq~ JO u01~da~xa aq'4 l{'41M ''4 sanba.! atp }O lEAOJddE papuaWWo~aJ pJEog aq.!. '1661' ~ 1 '4snonv uo (pJ~Oa ~uawdolaAaa pu~ 6U1UUEld al{~ SE UMOU~ MOU) pJEOg OU1UoZ PUE OU1UUEId al{'4- o~ pa~uasaJd S~M ~sanbaJ sll{J, '(~uawaaJ6e ~uawaI~~as 0661 al{~ ~q paMoIIE ~lWll aq'4 ~lq~lM) '4aa} aJEnbs 082:'LH: o~ 08S'STE WOJ} a~d aq'4 ~O} aOE'400} aJEnbs lE~o~ aq~ 6ulsEa_l~ul ~qa_laq~ '~aa} aJenbs OOL' 1 JO aSEa~~ul ~au e U1 pa~InsaJ aoe'4oo} aJenbs o~ SUOl~E~l}lpOW alIJ, 'a~ls ~odaa aWOH aq~ pue ~aa.l~S q~8 'M'S }O ap1s ~sea aq~ uo pa~E~ol SIa~JEd~no aq~ uaaM~aq u01~~auuo~ aISlE ssa~~E q~JOU aq~ a'4EulwlI3 '} PUE !Sla~Jed~no Ja~ua~ 6u1ddoqs a4~ o~ speaT ~E4~ '4-aaJ~s 4~8 'M'S }O ap1s ~sEa aq~ uo pa'4E~oI AEMaA1JP paAo~ddE a4~ pJEMq~nos a~E;)oIaH 'a !~aaJ~S q~8 'M'S }O ap1s '4-s~a al{'4- uo pa'4-~;)oT STa;)J~d~no .la~ua~ oU1ddoqs aq~ 0'4 4aaJ~S q48 'M'S WOJ} AeMaAlJp .laq~ouE JO uOl41PPV 'P ~ qfmOJl{~-aA 1-lP q41M ~u~q ~ooJ aJ~nbs 000' 9 'AJ04 S-OM~ E o~ 6ulPI1nq 11E'4-a.1 '4-00} aJ~nbs OO('v ~ WO.1} '4-aaJ~S 4'4-8 'M'S PUE PEOH ~401JqTooM JO .1aUJO~ ~s~aq4.10U a4'4- 4e Ta~.1Ed4nO aq~ }O asn }O U01~~u61sap pu~ sa1.10~s }O .1aqwnu 'az1s U1 aDuEq~ '~ !(TE~~lwqns a4'4- WO.1} '~u~~lTddE aq~ ~q UM~.1p4~lM S~M '4-sanba.1 a4~ JO U01~.1od slq~) u01~e~s SED ~OOJ aJ~nbs OS"1 E O~ TE1~.1awwo~ 11E~aJ JO '4-aaJ aJenbs OOO'v WO.1J ~aaJ~S 4'4-8 'M'S pu~ peoH ~4D1JqTooM }O JaUJO~ ~saMq~~ou aq'4 ~~ Ta;)JEd~no aq~ }O aZ1s pu~ asn u1 aDuEq;) 'q 1'4-8a.1'4-S l{'4-8 'M'S JO '4-saM pa~E~ol 'p~OH ~401JqTooM O~UO ~~MaA1.1p Mau E }O U01'4-1PPV 'E :6U1MOII0J a4'4- 8pnl~u1 o~ ~sanbaJ - 1661 }O Aew 'Z '6861 'I, JaqwaAoN uo ~sanba~ S14'4- paAoJdde u01ss1wwo~ A'4-1~ a4.1 . ~aaJ a~Enbs 08S' S 1 ( ~e pa6uEq~un pau1Ewa.l a;)d a4'4- .1oJ a6e'400J aJEnbs le404 aqJ, 'J8~Ua~ Uap.1~D '4-00} a.l~nDS SL(J61 e PUE 11~'4-8.1 }O '4-aa} aJEnbs OS~',01 papnl~u1 q~lqM (~odaa awoH) aJo'4-s sIE1Ja4ew oU1PI1nq e JO u01~lPPE al{'4- apnl~u1 0'4- ~sanbaJ 6861}0 Jaqo~~o '1 :Ma1AaJ .10} pa~'4-1wqns uaaq aAeq SU01'4-E~1}lPOW Ueld Ja'4-s~w 6U1MOII0} aq'4- '~U8W8a.1D~ ~uawal'4-'4-as lEU1Dl.lO alI~ a~ulS '~aa} aJenbs 08S'S1E ~IUO s~;)al}aJ UEId Ja~sew 0661 aq~ 'JaA8MOH 'UEld .1a~sew ~uaWal'4~as 0661 aq'4 - II~II ~ 1q14xS uo pa~~ldap '4-noAEl pue sasn all'4- apnl~ul o~ '~aa} a.lEnbs OOO'OZE JO wnw1xew e paAo.ldde '4-uawaa.16e ~uawaI~~as aq.1 '~~Jado.ld aq~ JO ~no-Pl1nq 04 J01Jd 'paJ1nba.l aq JaAa PInoM .l~ua.l~n~UO~ 5661 '6 q~.1EW pJeog ~uawdoTaAaa PUE 6U1UUEld :0.1 , II 3 To: Planning and Development Board March 9, 1995 the retail gross leasable area, The request included adjusting property lines to accommodate the expansion and the total square footage of the project remained at 315,580. On April 20, 1993 the City Commission approved the 8,745 square foot expansion subject to staff comments! and on August 10, 1993 the Planning and Development board approved a waiver of platting for the adjusted property lines in connection with the expansion. 4. March of 1993 - request to include the following: a, Subdivision of Tract B to create a ,957 acre outparcel, Tract B is that portion of the PCD that is located on the west side of S.W, 8th Street; b. Change in use and size of the outparcel at the northwest corner of Woolbright Road and S,W. 8th street from 4,000 square feet of retail commercial to a 3,040 square foot gas station (resurrection of the portion of the 1991 request that was withdrawn by the applicant); c, Add two new driveways into the proposed service station outparcel - one on S. W. 8th street and the other on Woolbright Road; d. Allow a canopy over the gasoline pumps to encroach the setbacks due to a difference in the service station regulations in effect in 1986 vs, the service station regulations in effect in 1993; and e, Reduce the building square footage specified on the master plan for Tract B from 62,000 to 55,040 square feet. With this request, the total square footage of the PCD decreased 6,960 square feet from 315,580 to 308,620, On April 20, 1993 the City Commission approved the request, subject to staff comments. As a result of the traffic evaluation of the proposed service station use, the square footage on Tract B decreased 24,000 square feet from a total of 55,040 square feet (52 I 000 commercial/retail plus 3,040 convenience s tore/gasol ine sales) to 31,040 square feet ( 28,000 commercial/retail plus 3,040 convenience store/gasoline sales) , Therefore, the total square footage of the PCD decreased 24,000 square feet from 308,620 to 284,620 square feet. ANALYSIS Changes in Planned Commercial Development (PCD) master plans are reviewed consistent with, Section 6,f,13,b, of Appendix A - Zoning as follows: b, "Modifications to approved plans which resul t in an increase of less than ten (10) per cent in measurable impacts as determined by including any changes in traffic generated, water consumed or sewage to be collected will require review and recommendation the planning and zoning board and final approval by the city commission. The city commission decision to approve, approve with modifications or jeny, shall be predicated upon a finding of consistency with the comprehensive plan and a finding that any such increase will not resul t in a negative impact on infrast~ucture delivery systems or the surrounding area in general. It is the intent of this -=-' -) ~ ..., . ' 4 To: Planning and Development Board March 9, 1995 section that all additional impacts be mitigated.. ," Based on the documentation provided, the changes to the three outparcels would generate in excess of a ten (10) per cent increase in water consumed and sewage collected, if the approved outparcels are evaluated against the proposed outparcels, An increase of only 2,8% in water consumed and sewage collected results if the proposed outparcels are evaluated against the entire PCD water and sewer impacts, In either scenario, the utility Department does not have an objection to the analysis provided and has not indicated that the increase will have a negative impact on the infrastruture delivery systems, A slight increase in pervious area will result in a minimal, positive impact on the PCD drainage. with respect to traffic, the traffic information submitted indicates that the traffic generated by the three outparcels will generate less than a ten (10) percent change. This information has been forwarded to Palm Beach County, The results of the review by the County have not been received at the time of this report, The following is an evaluation of each of the proposed changes listed on page one of this report: 1. subdivision of Tract C to make outbuilding 3 a separate outparcel and the redistribution of square footage among the outparcels As indicated in the stipulation settlement agreement, this is acceptable, Platting or a waiver of platting (at the determination of the City Engineer) to subdivide this parcel is required. As required, outparcels shall be self-sufficient with respect to lot size, setbacks, parking and other PCD zoning district requirements, 2. Relocation of the existing driveway on the east side of S,W, 8th street, south of the main entrance into the shopping center (Home Depot) - One entrance, in addition to the main entrance, was allowed pursuant to the 1990 settlement agreement, This existing driveway is the additional driveway referenced in the agreement, The proposed location of this additional driveway is closer to the original position (centrally located) identified in the Barton-Aschman traffic report, upon which the traffic conditions of the 1990 settlement agreement were based, 3, Addition of a second driveway on the east side of S,W. 8th street, between Woolbright Road and the main entrance to the shopping center (Home Depot) - As mentioned in previous item =2, the number of driveways is specifically limited in the 1990 settlement agreement, The addition of a second driveway is inconsistent with the 1990 settlement agreement, Since the Barton-Aschman report does not require an additional driveway to be added, it could be argued that this driveway is not needed and that safety and level of service are not impaired without it. Furthermore, this type of access design is contrary to the intent and purpose of a PCD, which is to provide for a planned (not piece-meal) , programmed series of development operat ions, designed as a whole through integration of principle buildings and ou~buildings that are linked via common use of access and infrastructure and similar architecture and other aesthetic elements. specifically with respect to access, this additional driveway defeats the purpose of requiring internal access roads and driveways to serve parcels within a planned develcpment. It should also be noted that the Barton-Aschman report stated 4 5 To: Planning and Development Board March 9, 1995 that the driveway on the east side of S.W. 8th street located north of the existing main entrance driveway was to be de:eted, The proposed master plan still reflects this driveway as being approved. 4, Median cut in S,W, 8th street If approved, this new intersection would capture much of the traffic anticipated and designed to be received by the main driveway that is located at the entrance to Home Depot. The main driveway is centrally located for the major portion of the retail uses located on the east side of S,W, 8th street, Since the Barton-Aschman report did not recommend a median cut, it could be argued that the proposed median cut is not consistent with the traffic report referenced in the 1990 settlement agreement and therefore not needed or possibly affecting level of service, Therefore, if the median cut is approved, it is recommended that a new analysis of the turning movements be submitted to determine the impact the median cut will have on S. W. 8th Street and Woolbright Road. Also, the proposed median cut would cause the east driveway into the site to become a major driveway which requires a one hundred (100) foot throat; the distance from the property line to a parking space or an access aisle, This would significantly impact the parking design of outbuilding 3, CONCLUSION This request was reviewed by the Technical Review Committee (TRC) on February 28, 1995 and the committee raised no objections at the time. However; -the committee did not have technical data regarding the impact the median cut and additional driveway would have on the surrounding roadways or the project itself. If this driveway and median cut are approved by the Commission, the Police Department recommends that north and south deceleration lanes be required at the cut to avoid congestion from motorists slowing down to make turns at this location (see Exhibit liD" Police Department Memorandum No. 95-0121) , It is also recommended that if any changes are approved by the Commission that are not reflected, or are contrary to, the proposed master plan, that three copies of a revised master plan be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department, prior to submittal of any future PCD requests. The Planning and Zoning Department is not making a specific recommendation on this request since components of the request are inconsistent with the latest settlement agreement. Deviation from this agreement are viewed as policy decisions of the Commission. tjh Attachments xc: Central File A:WoolPCD /:~~- '-- .. - ., f,Xll1-B1-T A {) CCl CONSULTANTS, INC. Consulting Engineers m Surveyors Planners ' 2200 PARK CENTRAL BLVD., N, SUITE 100, POMPANO BEACH, FL 33064, (305) 974-2200. FAX (305) 973-2686 February 14, 1995 Hand Delivery Ms. Tambri Heyden Planning Director CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Re: SHOPPBS OF WOOLBRIGHT PCD Boynton Beach, Florida CCL project No. 3~ol Dear Ms. Heyden: Enclosed herewith please find the following: 1. Twelve (12) signed and sealed prints of the revised master plan for the above-referenced project. 2. A check made payable to the City of Boynton Beach in the amount of $500.00. 3. Letter of Authorization form owner for CCL Consultants, Inc. to act as. agent for this matter. Please be advised that we are herein submitting for master plan amendment for the above-referenced project. We are proposing to amend the existing master plan as follows: A. outparcel 1 will be revised from 4300 SF to 6920 SF. B. Outparcel 2 will be revised from 5000 SF to 5755 SF. C. Outparcel 3 will be revised from a 2-story 6000 SF bank to a 1-story 2625 SF Taco Bell Fast Food Restaurant with a drive- thru lane. D. The locations of the driveways for these outparcels onto S.W. 8th street will be revised from what is presently shown on the existing master plan. In addition, we are proposing a median cut in the S.W. 8th street median which aligns with one of the proposed relocated driveways as well as prior-approved driveway location on the west side of S.W. 8th street. t~ / ow' .. 1W Ms. Tambri Heyden CCL project No. 3101 February 14, 1995 Page two We respectfully request that this proposed master plan amendment be placed on the next Technical Review Committee agenda and thusly on the next available Planning & Development Board as well as City eommission Aqenda. Should you have any questions or need any additional information, >"', please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, panile, Jr., P.E., P.L.S. ject Manager LRC/kag Enclosure cc: Mike Morton, Tradewinds Group Eduardo earcache, P.E., ,eKE Group, Inc. CCl CONSULTANTS, INC. '7 E~ll1.B1.'t B r:r ,-- ..-------' ---- --- ----------~ ----------- w "'...' ........0 ;.....~ ;;~. :ccr; ::=~~ ~l';_ ~"'!: ~~: Q'" I.... a-~ ~Cl" :jlI . z z .. .. -ar...n ~g~~ =:~~ ~!l",6 ;0-4.. ~.z:~ ;i~ 6=:; .0.. t:!~ ~;c~ ~~!: ..0 =O~ III S ;;: is o ~ (/l o III ii' ..... .' !:Xl ~ .;fnN .. ::e~ .,..z! I......Z wica ;:'.. i" "',."'m 0"< i!~~ ~?~ ....K ~S; ..... ..... ~8 .... i3 .. ~ 15 z -:lENUI ~::g~ :;~~ >>,..000( .!.Eln :=~i ~~~-' "'.... , .... ....z ...... 0"'''''- .. , 5 .. ~ z .. " ~ i ~ ~ ~ .. >= ::l~1 ..iSi i~i 1ft a. ,~ ;lI!"1 ~~. ~~i -,... &..0.. ..."'o~ ......~ W."C.. 101.160 1,....% "C3l~ :..!3 _mr"'2I ~;o ::z:ZC .. ~;: ...<.. ...... OZ" ~~:w "'UI~ ~S~ ::; -..~ Sin ;;:0 ~i ..'" :l! ~ ~ ~ i -i~n ~ gP .. In ;:!!ii ~Ill e g/!i~" .% ..~ ;lI ~' w ..~ ~u ii~ n o III >= ~~ m g II> t13i= ,_______ po.\.- ~ ;5:1: Y cpo!' 6 -+""~< o. ~::..~ ,,1 _ : p ." ~'S. 'ItI~' ,;.. Uo 3C g ~ - r- .0 · \,., ~ ~nm i ;m i:~ ~ ~.>!~~ ~' -4 , ~ !~'i~ .... ",;" -----;.;-----~ -4 \\~ L~i~~f~..;~ '/ i ,,'. ~ V .'r'II~~~ ' / / , I r r '. "-I ~;~~<-__ 00 ~.; \ . i .. ... 81 ' '\ II L~lmi' I /-:.~ j /~/ = 'I. '~i- . n - -! --t -- ~ /-'[7 I \ . J ~~ u ,w I'. b - _ ~ -==J----</,~ / ~_ 0 ;... .. ~ ~~ .p.-;::=.' I rt II....... It I p,....,........ . .! '<l -L~ r 1 / I I , .~~ 1 L; , 1 SUa llt! I './ ~ ___I ~--------=::~..,.~ \ ' z: - "!!l t 3> S ~ d'''1 ~ ,J.. ,,,,,~. i-~ ~ 1 :'~;\J::. .-h~-r4L,L-~~' f ~,.... ilrt~\:: ----------- -------------- , , ~___ __, __ ~f'o\' e _-------- "- _ _ 44' 51 1..." _ - ...("l~ ^ !=I'" ....""''''''.TO~."A:1'!. W,' TN -"" ----- ~I;:: r- !~ ~~':.~~:.:'.:;,;~..~; it ~. --- ? ""1"- L'"~OC'" ...... _ ___, ~ ===----_ ~ - - ',> ---- __- .L' "~~t::Cf711 .'f~~ii/, '-~r;;1f 1;;:H1~ . I ,~~i ~.~~~I r ,~ " . i\~' . ,,\;,_>=~;-= ~ ~'_ -,-:' :.~I I y,..----.._A)" I' \ ~ -, --- :'L" " I / -------------~ / ',. .1 "Ii W l--;~-i-:b:f=-"''ft- u L "'()/ --", - -,-4 .~ ;: '\'-' Il ,ilo ~ ~t:l- ~~~O~- ~: ~: '!]\ ~~ri/ J . \= - A \I "n ~ ~. ~ --V r "=------ '/"" 'J ~., ~, ~\) il i . -- la: / - : /.. i '1 ; I ,\i ~' . . - ~ \ ; F,r -7",\_ - - ~~ I ;!~ It u U U\ If 11 '---H..._____'----t / -!' i --'to <1,_, '.., \ ~\ ~= :/;'>-" ='\~ ,I ~l'l ~ \ \ =., t !-- -' : \ ~_ ~ \ i , <i. ~" "', I 'flftij --= y~ 1\ [ 11 ,J I ~~- :~.:~.\,--~ ~: ": ~~)~~~\:\,\II~l \.j ~.~;I~ ~~ ~i II:': -..,,!, I ;{1:1 I ~~~: :11 - ~~!. I~~ [1--.:::-, \'~ W- ''I ~~2::1 (It ;t. J I I :1~;1 ..:;: .:11. .---'--- ' "~ ".....~t- ~1II11 \ i ~ '111~1"'!'!I:lltr' 1r:". - ,;~,_~ ''r~'- .c !_I:~.) _, .' . J. " ,L ~ ~~--;;.~ ~-~ ,I '. .,,,1 i' I """....'.'.9". --~" ...._-;t~;:.J :: \ ___ ~f - - - - - I ".'We. C)IIW1 ~ !. I =Q " - -- --- -"- . --- -- - . ~. ;.:; , l' .., ... ...,.,,, I ;;>1~4 _ - -......... ....-- - -=- I . I -.:;: I-'=':....- '"- ~- t----------:,.;..L...HcnOM-..-----i--------~i!~--r ,o;,-i=:'. .n.. 0; I: ~ 1:0=1 Ii =, i r ~ i ~ ~ S'Co!':oo ~t~~ROAD ~ ~ t 5 ~a= J> . ~ ~~~. '~lC ~ ~! : >>~ ~ o ~ ~ 8 0.... e~ ~21~ jO~~ ~:;J ~~ J!!m 'V i: ~ .,., ,., n .0 ,..& =1 ....' Illn ..- ~ n -0 =1' 0.. :~ ..- ~ .. I . --------~f~ 1 ~ / 'ji I "- "-- = ; HI In Hi In lu t-~ :""~ i!i ~!I ;,- iJ I-!' lis .~ U\ - .~ ~ 0 .. III ... .. .. VI ; = =t .... m .. .. g 2 0 .. ~ !; ~ .. )Ii .. .. .. .. ~ - .. n ~ i .. I: = ;; o tl ~ ~ .. ,. F lljl'l ;rl:l~i~TWI'rl;;II!!lIII; li ': i 'I; ',.0".""1"1 i.,i. 'dll; ,. r. ,=ilj ~IUit l~ t~J, I '11 ll'!i 1"Ii.ll'!"""':j' 4:' \.... . 1 1~'lrl'rllrn'ZI~I:..1 d;1 ~... I " ~.J i1 illl\.l ;'1" '1'1 hi ;!I: "I it ,.1 ,', I' [, ".~~i I':' I " 'l'la) ,il I I F ~! .J ~i: ~~l I ~ II; I' '1::,11 :I~I II I ;l,o, ?~.?- it:; !~ f! i!i 'Jh,' {lit ~i i!i 'f, !;Ji ':L ! i I ;::hi~ .:~,t !i5 !! r~llia:;!~1 f;f~1 iff: :;:;,!, ' :11' 'l'. '1;<!E lUtl!..!, ': ::;;Ilt h:iJ ,f: }I i~;if~l ~ ii l~ ;! H 1/ !~ I ~ I I;~ ~ e ;: : .. .. < ,. g 5 III :I i i ,. ;; .. " ;jj~ ~; ~ g~ ~ "'0 t ~Si ~ a ~ l ~ g ! i 5 : ; ~ ~ ~ ~~?t.. "~i~ ~ r r- )Ii Z o c: VI m tD '" :D .. m = ~ ~8 ::o~:Z~ o h: Vi ...iZ :ga~ ..1 m ~i~VI I: ~ -. . is: I a- · .~I ...!!. . ig I ii ~ ..,0 -~ ~ ~; ~.g - - , . i.c q :. , . ~ a :"2 . I .. ~ . . " . ~ . s!~~=~;I ;:~~~~~= ~~~~~~; m",-c_.a;l ~;~~i~2 "'O"ll~D"''- c:z';;; ... "'1ft ~!ll~E!"':;~ !~a.1:~O ~ffi!aan; ~,:~~i~~ "tIm~~...z ~~ ",O"'~ "Cl n<""gl: O~~"i"'~ ~;:~lm~... ~~5=~=" ~~~~i;; rn z:3l.., (;Q.Z~~~ ~~5S=::~ zoo6zo.c ....~oaD"IIc: =44a!"'& o~~~;: ~~C1&SI ~.. z..~ ;3IUJ On "': :D~ !I- WI'" ;I~ . . :: !II :1.. ;I~ 0101 ::: =;;i ~ ~ ~ II .. : .. ~ I\,J Gl /1l : ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ .. . ~ ... ~ n : o !:J # ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ .. ~ III .. ~ n .. ... - .. ~ Kild.v b Assoe..".. landscilpe Archltccls)Plalln~rS 1551 Forum Place SUite 10010 West Palm Beach, Florod. 33401 (30516B9.5522 Sc.le 1 . 10' O.le :1J,IlJ.a OrrN" By Q"'~ ~l\eNo '\20S' 'toR 421.1 CX~ No. a!~3" SMet~Or SHOPPES OF WOOLBR~~T P C 0 0 ft, BOYNTON BEACH, F~ORIDA ,irZ >;':'; MASTER PLAN' ~ - " z 2 ~ ::Il ~ ~ o m en en ::Il o JIo C .. ; ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~-< mal .. en ::Il ~ - Ci ~~ ~ :i ~.. z 00 ~;ll ~3~)t -:0 n z m .. 'V III , : ~ ~ ? III ,,';;;' '0 1110 'It \ . ~ ~ ! ~ a ~ ~ ~ z < " ~ l\\6 ~o ..~ ;6 zZ ~~ en)li ::Il" Z !:) .. w m v~j >i~'. ~~ / -:!, . k~7~ ", . .. PROPOSED i/) I E X H I BIT C , . II . ' ~ iJ:~ :~'~""i !S::: 4 ."1'" T~ · :.: = ==i1~ 1:1;0 .~_fll!i ~;: 0'" atn!a ~o'= :;3 ~ z z ,. '" Ul n III it" -; I al q Scale. 1 .. 80 Date. ]/2R/gO Drawn By OAP F'Il! r-.o 4211 Oroiwlnq No 85-34 Sheet-L-.:lf ra"'~ &~:; :~~ a~~ 4Z:. ~i~ 1I..... ~d; ~I= :"~ !~= ..~o ..0'" "'", 5 .. ,. ;; .. . .~ W' .. *' . :,-" ,'- .-.;....~;i1-~ :i~...~~{~!.~ ,~:,-; ';" ~ :'I-:"-~ . ~. , ' I' . .~~ 1& -i,tI ~ ....... ,"g~ ~oil "",. ~S!..c silln =~i ~"'" Q~e - :a~ .....z !i~=\ ( ~:. "J, : ~ I'. w Z , .. ,. .. ,. ":a I .~ ~ ,. I >, !i; .....~ ..e:. .. ,,-.Ut .....z s"'~ ..!::!l ,.":a i';i40. ~...~ ........ ...",. oz:a ~~:a ..""~ wg I :~5 -..~ 5" ..n ,.0 :=i 0'" ,. ,. sOiJ4\'"i !lo71il 11115; "'II! ~ I!! ~ c a .. Ill! ~ ~ 1Il ... ..... .. .. .. :a :::::C!m t.:~;::~ ; r~ t ~ ~ ~::.:z -- . .. .. :& ~ ~ l; ~ . . . . .; , . 1111 ~I ! ~ j ~ s g . J g~ ~ g ~ ~ 1I . ~ !1 ,<<0 ~ '" 1; ~ ! ~ . ~ -j 0 ~ ,. )Ii .. CI c'" e ::. ~ :a n : a :a I !: '0 e :a ,. ;! N ~ .. = N - :6 : ~ S : ~ ~; .. n n ::::j ~ ... ... n n g g ~ ~ ? ? 111111 II I!mll fll'~ .. .. ,.);2"1Il ~ ~ I m H -j!~ lit- . ~ ~ l;1g:li~ ~ ~ ~- ; . i~~:I~i b I .. - ~"~i..i1 a I ~ ~:'I~ ~;gl;:!!yO;~1 .'1' z :..~ . ' ~ o .. . ~!;Gl i ~ :a S "..0-0"'>>0,.) 15- ~ 1ft .. mzZ ~ i. ~ , S i!i <..t-~i..; j" ~ I ~. 2~Ji> · ill .. oowil;...ill ~j n - ~ ~~=8=':~; It 1: ~ zo~6z!i.c I: ~~ c ~2i~:~i!i Z m .. ~cc~:z:<. . p ~ = ~I"'::; l:r ~ ~ ; "'~p!i:::;" g; .. - if 1;: z..~ =' . ..~ ~ t z ~ z !!':i 1lr:i!I~~!~~m~~ ~m I~ I II "1;11:1~!,~''";m! jl' h ~ I ;1 :,J1:h~ldll:il~i~ ~Id II j ,I ~~ll,.jtl~~~~,' 'I~ I' I f': '1-:I!,lf;rI~~:;'1It' ~:. " f',;I-:'I",,1 ,d I' '1 Ii !::!~~illle:l~ ~~ I' II 1'1'''''' "\l!lll,'!t "~I' , I Ii i" nWII!: ~i'~t" ~l' ;t! I' II' "'1"1 "jll"J!o"~1 il~ I ,.~ h ..~ . fL.... , :J.. .. 1P.''1IPI''II' "I~I"i .( I!'t, as VI. r,r ~ I ; I ;',:11 .i rt:i-' It, I, 'II', ". hi,I;.. JI ! ; II' ,', ~ , 'i I' . I I I,' o ( I r, i'I Ii , 11"'11 "llh ' I , ' !a'h'r.!! I'~,:" I' I.'" ,"1 I," Ii !l- j. . , h;~!l.;:tt!!. '!II~I,IIL:C4 .1 .. .. n . !;J ~ ..- ~~ w", .... ~ ,. III a... N ~ " iI :I ,,".:..1';:;'1";'1;; SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT AEV1'SION'S, . P.C.D. .~~ BOYNTON BE~H. F~ORIDA I'l- ~ MASTER PLAN' \ i ~ ; ~ ~ n III III :D o ,. o i s ~.. =ill :D I.. m "111 .- ." 0 -,. m ~.. Z GO .... , ...- az ,. ... r- .0 Z 'm .. E ,. III .~ \ [\" -= ; ~ ; :; Ii .~ ;,i ~~ i; ; J -~ Oq on "s =~ ~. ~ii .1 ;! ! o ~ ~ .. 10 '" ~ Z .. '" III :D Z l:l Kilday & Associates Landscape ArchItects/Planners 1551 Forum Place Suite 100A West Palm Beach. Florida 33401 '(30516895522 E X H I BIT D /3 W" 'W BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT Office of Professional Standards To: From: Date: Re: Tambri Heyden. Directo~ Lt. James Cwnmings ~ 28 FebruaJ)' 1995 Shoppes of Woolbright, P,C.D, TRC Memo # 95-0121 The comments that I have regarding this project concern S.W. 8 Street, and the curb cuts made north of the entrance at Woolbright, Although I have no problems with the curb cuts themselves, I would like to see deceleration lanes placed at the sights of these cuts, in order to facilitate motorists, and to keep the roadway free from unnecessaJ)' congestion, m rn@rno Wi ~ I~.!~ FE"" .-, 8 II ! I I ' :- , I I ' U - 'L.. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. //f LULiAIIUN M~ SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT P .C.D pea rON _8~AC.,,! ..' -'--=:1 L _=-1 ' -. V~~~,\, \ "V' ./ ...... , ,/.:' : .;.,R3...,',.. " \. /:. -. .~ ' i: " " ~ ~ ,;..... " . , / , .~~ R ~'c;", "'''. /. 13 '0 1/8 MILES ~~:j . \ \ \ \ \ \ \. . '~ ,'0 400. 800 FEET , 'r ' '" . 3- "rr,<1 ,]( / iT r' ~ .j\,\ j /1 J rtHn':~' ., .. MINUTES - PLANNING ANt !VELOPMENT BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA MARCH 14. 1995 Chainman lehnertz suggested giving the applicant six months to make a good faith effort. Ms. Heyden pointed out that all that would involve is submitting an application for a site plan or plat within six months. Mr. Kilday said he could probably have a submittal of the plat within six months. Motion Vice Chainman Dube moved to approve an 18 month retroactive and a 6 month time extension for zoning/master plan approval and concurrency exemption for the Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD based on the owner submitting a site plan for approval within that period of time, subject to staff comments. Mr. Weigle seconded the motion. Mr. Golden pointed out that a letter of intent is a pretty vague commitment. The motion carried 6-1. Mr. Golden cast the dissenting vote. 7. NEW BUSINESS A. Public Hearing Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning Mainstreet Car Wl.sh Jim Zengage Forward Progress, Inc. Between N. E. 1st Street and N. E. 2nd Street, imme- diately north of Mainstreet Car Wash Request for a map amendment to the Future land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan from Medium Density Residential to local Retail Commercial and rezoning from R-2 (Single and Duplex Dwelling District) to C-3 (Community Commercial) This item was rescheduled until April 11, 1995. 1. Project: Agent: Owner: location: Description: B. Subdivisions Master Plan Modification 1. Project: Agent: Owner: location: Description: Shoppes of WOolbright POD CCl Consultants, Inc. Howard R. Scharlin, Trustee Northside of Woolbright Road, east of the l.W.D.D. E-4 Canal Request to modify the previously approved master plan to subdivide outbuilding 3 into .895 acres, revise the outbuilding sizes (outbuilding 1 from 4,300 to 6,920 square feet, outbuilding 2 from 5,000 square - 12 - MINUTES - PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA MARCH 14. 1995 feet to 5,755 square feet and outbuilding 3 from two stories and 6,000 square feet to one story and 2,625 square feet), add a driveway on the east side of S. W. 8th Street, 400 feet north of Woolbright Road, relocate the existing driveway on S. W. 8th Street, 190 feet to 260 feet north of Woolbright Road and provide a median cut on S. W. 8th Street for the relocated driveway. Ms. Heyden stated that the applicant is requesting approval to modify their pre- viously approved master plan. The property is 31.99 acres and is approved for 284,620 square feet of commercial retail development. This request is comprised of six parts. The first change is subdivision of Tract C to make outbuilding 3 a separate .895 acres outparcel. Tract C is located at the northeast corner of S. W. 8th Street and Woolbright Road and south of the main entrance into Home Depot. The second part of the request is a change in the size of outbuilding 3 from a two-story 4,300 square foot bank to a one-story 2,625 square foot drive-through fast food restaurant. The issue of the drive-through is being reserved to the discussion of a conditional use application, which is pending for a Taco Bell Restaurant. The next part of the request is a change in the area of outbuilding 2 from 5,000 square feet to 5,755 square feet. They shifted around the square footage of the outparcel. The overall square footage of the project has not changed. The fourth change is a change in the building area of outparcel 1 from 4,300 to 6,920 square feet. The fifth change is relocation of the existing driveway located on the east side of S. W. 8th Street, 30 feet south, from 290 feet to 260 from the south property 11ne of the PCD. The last change is the addition of a driveway on the east side of S. W. 8th Street, approximately 400 feet north of the south property line of the PCD. This driveway was requested on a previous master plan modification that was tabled by the City Commission in 1991. ' . The Shoppes of Woolbright PCD is part of a stipulated settlement agreement between the Tradewinds Development Corporation and the City that was entered into on January 24, 1990, which was a revision of an earlier stipulated settle- ment agreement from November 6, 1986. That stipulated settlement vested the project for traffic, water and sewer so that no time extensions would be required prior to build-out of the project. Ms. Heyden advised that some of the changes are inconsistent with the stipulated settlement agreement. Those changes will be discussed by the City Commission. - 13 - MINUTES - PLANNING AND _~VELOPMENT BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA MARCH 14. 1995 Since 1991, Mr. Morton, the primary agent for this piece of property, has iden- tified a punch list of items that are in dispute. The City has been working for the past three years toward revising the stipulated settlement agreement. Some of those issues are impacting the current applications that are in the process, such as the conditional use application for Taco Bell. However, since the agreement has not been finalized yet by the City C0IIII1ssion, this master plan modification is being submitted to reduce the punch list. The subdivision of Tract C is addressed in the agreement and is acceptable. According to the agreement, platting or a waiver of platting would be required to subdivide the property. With regard to relocation of the existing driveway on the east side of S. W. 8th Street, one entrance, in addition to the main entrance, was allowed pursuant to the 1990 agreement. This existing driveway is the additional driveway referenced in the agreement. Therefore, the proposed location of the additional driveway is closer to the original position, which was centrally located, iden- tified in the Barton-Aschman traffic report, upon which the traffic conditions of the 1990 agreement were based. Mr. Rosenstock left the meeting at 8:52 p.m. The addition of a second driveway is inconsistent with the agreement. Furthenmore, there are other reasons that this s~cond driveway is inconsistent. The intent of PCDs is to encourage a planned program series of operations that integrate all the buildings as one whole picture (integration of access ways, infrastructure, streets, landscaping and some kind of unifying element with respect to architecture). Therefore, this defeats the purpose of requiring internal access roads and driveways to serve parcels. In addition, the Barton-Aschman report indicated that the driveway on the east side of S. W. 8th Street, north of the existing main entrance driveway, was to be deleted. The proposed master plan still reflects this driveway as being approved. If the median cut in S. W. 8th Street is approved, this new intersection would capture much of the traffic anticipated and designed to be received by the main driveway. The new median cut would encourage the additional driveway being requested to become a major driveway as well. Therefore, the additional drive- way that would serve the Taco Bell Restaurant would have to meet the City's 100 foot throat requirement. If the median cut is approved, staff recommends that a new analysis of the, turning movements be submitted to detenmine the impact the median cut will have on S. W. 8th Street and Woolbright Road. Also, the Police Department recommended north and south deceleration lanes along 8th Street to serve the new driveway. It is also recommended that if any changes approved by the Commission are different than what is reflected on the proposed master plan, three copies of a revised master plan be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department to reflect those changes. Vice Chainman Dube noticed that the building on the northwest corner is not the same shape as the building that was approved last year. Ms. Heyden explained - 14 - MINUTES - PLANNING AND 1I0ELOPMENT BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA MARCH 14. 1995 that she had recommended a master plan modification be submitted to address splitting that building. The site plan came in before the master plan modifica- tion. The site plan was approved and expired. Therefore, the master plan was never changed to reflect the change. Louis Campanelli. Vice President of CCl Consultants, felt that the median cut issue and also the major driveway issue should be left up to the attorneys and the City Engineer. He reminded everyone that the second driveway was approved by this Board in 1991. The driveway spacings meet the requirements. He respectfully requested that this application be approved. Mr. Weigle did not think the property owner should get anything except what is required by law. Chainman lehnertz agreed. Mr. Golden agreed that the property owner should not be given anything further than what has been granted in the settlement. On the other hand, in order to develop this property, he felt that there are going to have to be some minor modifications to get things to work right. However, he did not think major changes are appropriate. It appeared to Mr. Golden that the additional driveway is being driven by the bank being changed to a fast food restaurant with drive-through. Chainman Lehnertz inquired about the status of the gas station that was previ- ously approved. Mr. Campanelli stated that it is presently under design. Chainman lehnertz referred to the Woolbright Place PUD church parcel and asked if Mr. Campanelli is aware that the City has ordinances in tenms of the minimum distance between gas stations and churches. Mr. Campanelli indicated he was not aware of that. Vice Chainman Dube pointed out that the gas station was supposed to be built once the power l.ine was moved, which was about fourteen months ago. Mr. Campanelli stated that they also had to relocate an abandoned force main, which was recently done. With regard to the median cut. the engineer for Taco Bell was present and said he would be willing to work with Mr. Morton and remove that from the applica- tion. He is planning to submit the plans so that he can be in front of this Board at the April meeting. ' Mr. Weigle stated that the area where Taco Bell is proposing to locate was approved as a bank and he felt it should remain as a bank. He stated that any site adjustments that the property owner wanted should have been included in the settlement agreement. He did not feel it was up to the Board to give anything to the property owner that is not in the settlement agreement. Mr. Golden noticed that the staff report addresses what was approved under the master plan for the settlement agreement in tenms of the square footage. However. it did not reflect all the square footage that was approved under the settlement agreement. Ms. Heyden stated that the latest approved master plan - 15 - MINUTES - PLANNING ANO -~VELOPMENT BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MARCH 14, 1995 allowed 284,000 square feet, and the settlement agreement allowed 320,000 square feet. Mr. Golden asked if the Board is obligated in any way to approve any square footage above and beyond what is reflected on the master plan that was tied to the agreement. Ms. Heyden could not answer that question. She said the 1990 master plan that was approved was a settlement master plan and showed 315,580 square feet. Both parties agreed that that was the settlement master plan and that was the square footage they wanted. Vice Chainman Dube felt Taco Bell would be a nice asset. The engineer for Taco Bell believed that when Taco Bell submitted an applica- tion, Michael Haag took it to the City Attorney and that the restaurant was going to be incorporated into the revised settlement. Mr. Golden asked what exactly is going on with the conditional use application. Ms. Heyden advised that Mr. Morton turned in the conditional use application because he contended that because the 1986 stipulated settlement agreement pro- hibits fast food restaurants and drive-throughs, but the 1990 agreement is silent, that the 1990 agreement, supersedes the 1986 agreement. This is not staff's position. Therefore, since there was some doubt, when the application came in, it was put on hold, not only because of the drive-through issue, but because of the issue of subdividing and the new access issues. It seemed to Mr. Golden that this entire discussion is premature until they work out exactly what is what between these two versions and come to some consensus. Motion Mr. Weigle moved to deny the request to modify the previously approved master plan. Mr. Golden seconded the motion which carried 5-1. Vice Chainman Dube cast the dissenting vote. C. Conststency Review 1. Dental laboratortes as I condittonal use in the C-l, Offtce Professional, zontng district Ms. Heyden stated that the City is initiating an amendment to the zoning code to allow dental laboratories in the C-1 zoning district. Due to the pyramiding of uses in the zoning district, if approved, this use will be allowed in the C-l, C-2, C-3, and C-4 zo~1ng districts, subject to conditional use. Currently, den- tal laboratories are allowed only in the M-l zoning district. Ms. Heyden stated that this has come about because of a recent denial of an occupational license request for a laboratory in a mult1tenant building where a dentistry was located. The original occupational request for that dental laboratory was based on an interpretation that it was accessory to the den- tistry. The dental lab wants to move to a different bay within the building. Since it will no longer be adjacent to the dentistry, it will no longer be detenmined to be accessory because it will be in and of itself a principal use. - 16 - HANDOUT 7.B.1 SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT peD MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION TO: THRU: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-090 *REVISED MARCH 13, 1995 Chairman and Members Planning and Develop~t Boarp~ ~ AI. Tambri J, Heyden ~~z. t~ Planning and Zoning Director /' Michael E, Haan.~~ Zoning and Site opment Administrator March 10, 1995 Shoppes of Woolbright PCD - File No, MPMD 95-001 Master plan modification (driveway, median cut and shift in outparcel sizes and boundaries) NATURE OF REQUEST CCL Consultants, Inco{ agent for Howard R. Scharlin, trustee of the property, is requesting approval to modify the previously approved master plan for the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD. The 31,99 acre planned commercial development zoned property, approved for 284,620 square feet of commercial/retail development, is located on the north side of Woolbright Road and east of the L,W,D.D, E-4 canal, The proposed changes, described in the attached letter from CCL Consultants, dated February 14, 1995 (see Exhibit "A") are itemized below. In addition to the changes stated in the letter of submittal, a second driveway is requested located on the east side of S. W. 8th street, approximately 400 feet north of the south property line of the pcn (see Exhibit IIBII - proposed master plan): 1, Subdivision of Tract C to make outbuilding 3 a separate ,895 acre outparcel, Tract C is located at the northeast corner of S,W, 8th Street and Woolbright Road and south of the main entrance into the Horne Depot, * ') L. . Change in the size of the outbuilding 3 from a one-story, 4{300 square foot building to a one-story, 2,625 square foot drive-through, fast food restaurant. A conditional use application{ as required by the zoning code, is in progress for a drive-through{ fast food restaurant as the use of this outbuilding. 3, Change in the building area of outbuilding 2 from 5,000 square feet to 5{755 square feet. 4. Change in the building area of outparcel 1 from 4,300 square feet to 6,920 square feet. * 5. Relocation of the existing driveway located on the east side of S.W. 8th Street, 30 feet south, from 290 feet to 260 from the south property line of the pcn. 6, Aq,dition of a driveway on the east side of S,W. 8th street, approximately 400 feet north of the south property line of the PCD. This driveway was requested on a previous master plan modification that was tabled by the city Commission; therefore it has been added to this request, BACKGROUND The Shoppes of Woolbright PCD is part of a November 6{ 1986 and January 24{ 1990 stipulated settlement agreement between the City and Tradewinds Development Corporation, The City Commission ratified the settlement agreement by approving a master plan modification on May 15, 1990 that depicted the applicable condi tions of the January 24, 1990 stipulation and settlement agreement (see Exhibit "C" - master plan pursuant to the 1990 stipulated settlement agreement), The agreement vested the project for traffic, water and sewer, so that no time extensions for 7.B.1 SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT PCD MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-090 FROM: Chairman and Members Planning and Developemnt Board Tambri J, HeYden~d~'p c7t~~A,- Planning and Zoning Director ~ Michael E. Haa;--f)?'l? I!u& Zoning and Site _ elopment Administrator March 10, 1995 . TO: THRU: DATE: SUBJECT: Shoppes of Woolbright PCD - File No, MPMD 95-001 Master plan modification (driveway, median cut and shift in outparcel sizes and boundaries) NATURE OF REQUEST CCL Consultants, Inc" agent for Howard R, Scharlin, trustee of the property, is requesting approval to modify the previously approved master plan for the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD, The 31.99 acre planned commercial development zoned property, approved for 284,620 square feet of commercial/retail development, is located on the north side of Woolbright Road and east of the L.W.D,D. E-4 canal. The proposed changes, described in the attached letter from CCL Consultants, dated February 14, 1995 (see Exhibit IIAII) are itemized below. In addition to the changes stated in the letter of submittal, a second driveway is requested located on the east side of S, W. 8th Street, approximately 400 feet north of the south property line of the PCD (see Exhibit IIB" - proposed master plan): 1. subdivision of Tract C to make outbuilding 3 a separate ,895 acre outparcel. Tract C is located at the northeast corner of S.W. 8th Street and Woolbright Road and south of the main entrance into the Home Depot, 2. Change in the size of the outbuilding 3 from a two-story, 6,000 square foot bank to a one-story, 2,625 square foot drive-through, fast food restaurant. A conditional use application, as required by the zoning code, is in progress for a drive-through, fast food restaurant as the use of this outbuilding. 3, Change in the building area of outbuilding 2 from 5,000 square feet to 5,755 square feet. 4. Change in the building area of outparcel 1 from 4,300 square feet to 6,920 square feet. 5, Relocation of the existing driveway located on the east side of S,W. 8th street, 70 feet north, from 190 feet to 260 from the south property line of the PCD, 6. Addition of a driveway on the east side of S.W, 8th Street, approximately 400 feet north of the south property line of the PCD, This driveway was requested on a previous master plan modification that was tabled by the City Commission; therefore it has been added to this request, BACKGROUND The Shoppes of Woolbright PCD is part of a November 6, 1986 and January 24, 1990 stipulated settlement agreement between the City and Tradewinds Development Corporation. The City Commission ratified the settlement agreement by approving a master plan modification on May 15, 1990 that depicted the applicable condi tions of the January 24, 1990 stipulation and settlement agreement (see Exhibit "C" - master plan pursuant to the 1990 stipulated settlement agreement). The agreement vested the project for traffic, water and sewer, so that no time extensions for I 2 To: Planning and Development Board March 9, 1995 concurrency would ever be required, prior to build-out of the property. The settlement agreement approved a maximum of 320,000 square feetl to include the uses and layout depicted on Exhibit "C" - the 1990 settlement master plan. However, the 1990 master plan reflects only 3151580 square feet. Since the original settlement agreement, the following master plan modifications have been submitted for review: 1. october of 1989 request to include the addition of a building materials store (Home Depot) which included 102,250 square feet of retail and a 19,375 square foot garden center. The total square footage for the PCD remained unchanged at 315/580 square feet. The City Commission approved this request on November 211 1989. 2. May of 1991 - request to include the following: a. Addition of a new driveway onto Woolbright Roadl located west of S.W. 8th Street; b. Change in use and size of the outparcel at the northwest corner of Woolbright Road and S.W. 8th Street from 4/000 square feet of retail commercial to a 1,250 square foot gas station (this portion of the request was withdrawn by the applicantl from the submittal); c. Change in sizel number of stories and designation of use of the outparcel at the northeast corner of Woolbright Road and S.W. 8th Street from a 4,300 square foot retail building to a two-story, 6,000 square foot bank with drive-through; d. Addition of another driveway from S.W. 8th Street to the shopping center outparcels located on the east side of S.W. 8th street; e. Relocate southward the approved driveway located on the east side of S.W. 8th street that leads to the shopping center outparcels; and f. Eliminate the north access aisle connection between the outparcels located on the east side of S.W. 8th street and the Home Depot site. The modifications to square footage resulted in a net increase of 1,700 square feet, thereby increas ing the total square footage for the PCD from 315/580 to 317,280 square feet (within the limit allowed by the 1990 settlement agreement). This request was presented to the Planning and Zoning Board (now known as the Planning and Development Board) on August 13, 1991. The Board recommended approval of the request 1 with the exception of the additional driveway on Woolbright Road. The minutes from the August 201 1991 and September 19, 1991 City Commission meetings state that the request was tabled at the request of the City Attorney because of a pending motion in the Tradewinds case and that the City Attorney wished to confer with counsel for Tradewinds on the issue. A review of City records indicate the request was not removed from the table. 3. March of 1993 - request to include the addition of 8/745 square feet to the garden center at the home Depot. The garden center increased from 19,375 square feet to 28/120 square feet. Pursuant to the 1990 settlement agreement, the square footage of the garden center is not included as part of J- 3 To: Planning and Development Board March 91 1995 the retail gross leasable area. The request included adjusting property lines to accommodate the expansion and the total square footage of the project remained at 315,580. On April 20, 1993 the city commission approved the 8/745 square foot expansion subject to staff comments, and on August 10, 1993 the Planning and Development board approved a waiver of platting for the adjusted property lines in connection with the expansion. 4. March of 1993 - request to include the following: a. Subdivision of Tract B to create a .957 acre outparcel. Tract B is that portion of the PCD that is located on the west side of S.W. 8th Street; b. Change in use and size of the outparcel at the northwest corner of Woolbright Road and S.W. 8th Street from 4,000 square feet of retail commercial to a 3,040 square foot gas station (resurrection of the portion of the 1991 request that was withdrawn by the applicant); c. Add two new driveways into the proposed service station outparcel - one on S. W. 8th street and the other on Woolbright Road; d. Allow a canopy over the gasoline pumps to encroach the setbacks due to a difference in the service station regulations in effect in 1986 vs. the service station regulations in effect in 1993; and e. Reduce the building square footage specified on the master plan for Tract B from 62,000 to 55/040 square feet. with this requestl the total square footage of the PCD decreased 6/960 square feet from 315/580 to 308,620. On April 20, 1993 the City Commission approved the request, subject to staff comments. As a result of the traffic evaluation of the proposed service station use, the square footage on Tract B decreased 24,000 square feet from a total of 55/040 square feet (52,000 commercial/retail plus 3,040 convenience store/gasol ine sales) to 31/040 square feet (28/000 commercial/retail plus 3,040 convenience store/gasoline sales) . Therefore, the total square footage of the PCD decreased 24,000 square feet from 308/620 to 284,620 square feet. ANALYSIS Changes in Planned Commercial Development (PCD) master plans are reviewed consistent with" Section 6.F.13.b. of Appendix A - Zoning as follows: b. "Modifications to approved plans which result in an increase of less than ten (10) per cent in measurable impacts as determined by including any changes in traffic generated, water consumed or sewage to be collected will require review and recommendation the planning and zoning board and final approval by the city commission. The city commission decision to approve, approve with modifications or deny, shall be predicated upon a finding of consistency with the comprehensive plan and a finding that any such increase will not result in a negative impact on infrastructure delivery systems or the surrounding area in general. It is the intent of this 3 4 To: Planning and Development Board March 9, 1995 section that all additional impacts be mitigated. .." Based on the documentation provided, the changes to the three outparcels would generate in excess of a ten (10) per cent increase in water consumed and sewage collected, if the approved outparcels are evaluated against the proposed outparcels. An increase of only 2.8% in water consumed and sewage collected results if the proposed outparcels are evaluated against the entire PCD water and sewer impacts. In either scenario, the utility Department does not have an objection to the analysis provided and has not indicated that the increase will have a negative impact on the infrastruture delivery systems. A slight increase in pervious area will result in a minimall positive impact on the PCD drainage. with respect to traffic, the traffic information submitted indicates that the traffic generated by the three outparcels will generate less than a ten (10) percent change. This information has been forwarded to Palm Beach County. The results of the review by the County have not been received at the time of this report. The following is an evaluation of each of the proposed changes listed on page one of this report: 1. subdivision of Tract C to make outbuilding 3 a separate outparcel and the redistribution of square footage among the outparcels As indicated in the stipulation settlement agreement, this is acceptable. Platting or a waiver of platting (at the determination of the City Engineer) to subdivide this parcel is required. As required, outparcels shall be self-sufficient with respect to lot size, setbacks, parking and other PCD zoning district requirements. 2. Relocation of the existing driveway on the east side of S.W. 8th street, south of the main entrance into the shopping center (Home Depot) - One entrance, in addition to the main entrance, was allowed pursuant to the 1990 settlement agreement. This existing driveway is the additional driveway referenced in the agreement. The proposed location of this additional driveway is closer to the original position (centrally located) identified in the Barton-Aschman traffic reportl upon which the traffic conditions of the 1990 settlement agreement were based. 3. Addition of a second driveway on the east side of S.W. 8th street, between Woolbright Road and the main entrance to the shopping center (Home Depot) - As mentioned in previous item #2, the number of driveways is specifically limited in the 1990 settlement agreement. The addition of a second driveway is inconsistent with the 1990 settlement agreement. Since the Barton-Aschman report does not require an additional driveway to be added, it could be argued that this driveway is not needed and that safety and level of service are not impaired without it. Furthermore I this type of access design is contrary to the intent and purpose of a PCD, which is to provide for a planned (not piece-meal), programmed series of development operations, designed as a whole through integration of principle buildings and outbuildings that are linked via common use of access and infrastructure and similar architecture and other aesthetic elements. Specifically with respect to access, this additional driveway defeats the purpose of requiring internal access roads and driveways to serve parcels within a planned development. It should also be noted that the Barton-Aschman report stated 4 5 To: Planning and Development Board March 9, 1995 that the driveway on the east side of S.W. 8th street located north of the existing main entrance driveway was to be deleted. The proposed master plan still reflects this driveway as being approved. 4. Median cut in S. W. 8th street If approved I this new intersection would capture much of the traffic anticipated and designed to be received by the main driveway that is located at the entrance to Home Depot. The main driveway is centrally located for the major portion of the retail uses located on the east side of S.W. 8th street. Since the Barton-Aschman report did not recommend a median cutl it could be argued that the proposed median cut is not consistent with the traffic report referenced in the 1990 settlement agreement and therefore not needed or possibly affecting level of service. Therefore I if the median cut is approved, it is recommended that a new analysis of the turning movements be submitted to determine the impact the median cut will have on S. W. 8th street and Woolbright Road. Alsol the proposed median cut would cause the east driveway into the site to become a major driveway which requires a one hundred (100) foot throat; the distance from the property line to a parking space or an access aisle. This would significantly impact the parking design of outbuilding 3. CONCLUSION This request was reviewed by the Technical Review Committee (TRC) on February 28, 1995 and the committee raised no objections at the time. However I the committee did not have technical data regarding the impact the median cut and additional driveway would have on the surrounding roadways or the project itself. If this driveway and median cut are approved by the Commission, the Police Department recommends that north and south deceleration lanes be required at the cut to avoid congestion from motorists slowing down to make turns at this location ( see Exhibit "D" Police Department Memorandum No. 95-0121). It is also recommended that if any changes are approved by the Commission that are not reflected I or are contrary tOI the proposed master planl that three copies of a revised master plan be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department I prior to submittal of any future PCD requests. The Planning and Zoning Department is not making a specific recommendation on this request since components of the request are inconsistent with the latest settlement agreement. Deviation from this agreement are viewed as policy decisions of the Commission. tjh Attachments xc: Central File A:WooIPCD 6' f,Xl:l1.B1.'f A. ~ . ~ CCl CONSULTANTS, INC. Consulting Engineers m Surveyors Pmnne~ ~ 2200 PARK CENTRAL BLVD., N, SUITE 100, POMPANO BEACH, FL 33064, (305) 974-2200. FAX (305) 973-2686 February 14, 1995 Hand Delivery Ms. Tambri Heyden Planning Director CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Re: SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT PCD Boynt;on Beach, Florida CCL Project; No. 3~O~ Dear Ms. Heyden: Enclosed herewith please find the following: 1. Twelve (12) signed and sealed prints of the revised master plan for the above-referenced project. 2. A check made payable to the City of Boynton Beach in the amount of $500.00. 3. Letter of Authorization form owner for CCL Consultants, Inc. to act as agent for this matter. Please be advised that we are herein submitting for master plan amendment for the above-referenced project. We are proposing to amend the existing master plan as follows: A. Outparcel 1 will be revised from 4300 SF to 6920 SF. B. Outparcel 2 will be revised from 5000 SF to 5755 SF. C. Outparcel 3 will be revised from a 2-story 6000 SF bank to a 1-story 2625 SF Taco Bell Fast Food Restaurant with a drive- thru lane. D. The locations of the driveways for these outparcels onto S.W. 8th Street will be revised from what is presently shown on the existing master plan. In addition, we are proposing a median cut in the S.W. 8th Street median which aligns with one of the proposed relocated driveways as well as prior-approved driveway location on the west side of S.W. 8th Street. '7 ..... -,' Ms. Tambri Heyden CCL Project No. 3101 February 14, 1995 Page two We respectfully request that this proposed master plan amendment be placed on the next Technical Review Committee agenda and thusly on the next available Planning & Development Board as well as city Commissioh A~anda. Should you have any questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, panile, Jr., P.E., P.L.S. ject Manager LRC/kag Enclosure cc: Mike Morton, Tradewinds Group Eduardo Carcache, P.E., CKE Group, Inc. ill ~,~,,~ ~W ~ InI ',I) I, . l~ I 1 ~~iNG AND \ zmJJrl~'..!lf.E.L_.....__.. ,; 1_,. CCL CONSULTANTS, INC. ~ ? f,Xl:l1.B1.'f B Cf ..:;:!! .... -t C .0"'.'- ~~~ >: m ........0 .~....JII!: ::e~ < .'Vi'" .....z! m T/!!c. .....-tz 5 :Cl:~ wO~1D ~=~g .....z en "tI ::;!!"'2 i: ~~- 0"< m ..%'"!i :DOm ;!!~= ~~r; ~ Z .... ~r' I w..1: mOl .... I:I....~ :s; m ..om ~","'4 ~;! ;.t2 ~ .. .'" 3: z 3 z m '" '" ~ 6 z -1I....n .~Ilo)cn ~g~~ !:3:g~ =:~ia ;"'4oj! tJEm 't!jcnb !.~I~ ;:0...... ~~z J ~ :~t~ ."r:r ~o.. - rJ:m e~ omm !H:t Sa; . .... ."mz :",1 rmoO 0-4(11- w.... .. I ...e 6 m w"'" .. z Z~3 w " w Z ."0 . ,. ..0" !:: ,. '"", ~ e :; ,. " ~ " .. ::!:::~ -;::..."0 1:,."" i~~ "",,fAo:a ii-4Jlo~ ~, W-a c~ w.clo..cn ~~I 1~-4% "'I:::a:s. ~11I!:::s! -l! "'m"'~ .;0 ;lIm nz. E~~ ~~~ .,,<... ~N~ ...",. oZ", gm a~:V .cn~ wO. ;l ~~~ ":r,, .. -",.. ~ e... :;n I ,.0 .J ~i ",,,, r ,. ... -"QNO :;pp ,~ .. " .. jlln ~i5~~ "HI g~h ;:'J~' ::: ~~ :d g~ n 0 ~ 0 .. 0 en n II> Cil .... I' 0) ~ Scale: 1" . 10' D.te: ~J711/.n Drawn By. aAP File No.1205 1 XR .21,1 OA'oMng No, 85-34 5_.--1--01 91..~"\~ , ~ ~,,,'_"L""'. t'''~.';.~:~~~ . ~. ~I'OS i" -----~~ 1''''' -- ~nt ~ k <~g~ ( \ --~ ~"" ~ "" I'. ""\00... "I".E _ . . ====--- \..)>- ----- : "- . ,1\,_ { .. .I/-+---::..::..=-- ';F~-'" ... ..-,_ ~~.. ~ n_ .^ i~: -.-.g~-=-~ ~-O -).. ~, " ;!It\I ~!~ '~~A ~I! 'I ~:- j :11 ~~rJ....~ 0 ,;~= : ~~, 1 ' I, I ~ ~- .:-':- --" - I y/..--__~.=.z4'J,i \ _ fl _ ;:d n_ " - I / -- / I \ :J\ -\--- ._-_":'l-~. "",,,,' ',' : /y/' ..--~' '~ '. \ n \'Tr- ~;IU~ \ ,~ f V /' ;/"'"", .---:/' :' \ ~~.I.' I~ ir~r i~-~:hr'~: ~ ~\ j;--,j(f '~. \- ,- A' II , I> II ~ ~ ~ ~ '- .Af ,'If 'C. --- ' :...-~ _,] _~"II ~ I ~ ~\) ~I.:. i ~ \ ~I~ i / . = ;.: i' "- : "\, .. , \ \{ = l-V V""\. - . ~ i ..:; :"'~II,ill,i 'i \~ ,\",," "~"l;" "~=":}~~ ~ (~i' I I _ \ -,' I, 'L-_ .:.1.---1 ::,\1 '.~il<'-il """'1' ~ '_"_ I~~' " j/(hj :-.~ T~~lll n I - c.."::: -.-\ - = ~f i ' I -, ~~'\ ,! 1:\ I ~i j ~ I I ---.; '. c~_.."".._""..""llO.' .JOWlO I, k ~ "" i '\ \1 (.\\\ I g ~ I ,.,.i ~ ' ~ ~ c~ t: If'-" L\ ! d' ~f' : ill ~~'I '~ ~,~ III , \ II ~ \ I f\' : ~ I, "I' 1\ ' I II t ..~ I : :%I Z'" \ ~ ~ I ~ I -'1 I !,r I ~ IV Z I 1 I Jill "1 IJ; \ i !i II I ~..~~... _ Ii \ ,c+, \ LJ _ ~-"- \ .../}...lJ..--... \,,1-- \ o \ if:<: \ ....._....._~, \;-"f! r j L I I " ~ ~ I~. ~~ , .... = ~ --.::;' +=- .. ~--'- ~! '" ;;~~ z so.,.~"'.. ;11: t ~: __ ~ __ - -.-J , -- - / 5~.V':''''''VE' 0 ~, ~~~ rTJ ~ ~ .. L~ 5013_1629000 I ;gl'!-:-i . ._~-~ )<.~ - H--= ~ !___~_ __ :Il!i~ __~g.,. -=.-: _ - ,'_-=- Z -------~-'W;ST~IN_;;eCT.ON_;.----~ 0 ~~~~ ~ SQtH16'E sn91 51 ~ ~ ~~~~ :t :~ ~ :5~~~ S.C~~o,~t!~ROAD ~~ ~ C::lll~ ...m ~ ~o~ ~~ ~ f ~ ~; ~ n ':' ~ o ; _ -'I \ ",' "IJ. \ II> o c;j o I ~ II" , I I .' J; . ~ ~ ---- Cp-"t-\- ~ . % . z o ,,- ~ \., II " " "J,..; >,1 ! II ~_ ' ! 1\1 i ~ : : ' I I t ~ ! m m " " In [II 109 .11 I ! lit [U ~ ~ t~~ I ~ ~ ~ii I Hi I II!' I I'~ : ~z~~~~~ =ti1i5~ e:a =;:5~~~~ ~~!:(~~;rn 6E~t.~~g cno"S;;c -4r !i6z~cn.c;rn !~~ecni~ ~~~~~C)i ~$i~~~~ "tI~~~~~Z ~U) mom~ ~~8~!!~~ Cl)JIo%::aZZ21 m....Sl-mm-4 ~:S~~~,; "IX2.0!,~~ ~nl~:;~:~ ~2=Z~~~ ~~~g;~: zocE)zo-< :-,z02JO"lc 2zo:e-cz ~c:c:-x< g&m~:~ CI)~d!i=icn .~ zm~ ::aU) On m: ::a~ .% ~;ll;!;O . ",a.... .. ~ m ~i:en ..lilt 0 ft ~ _ -. . :S: I s- ft ;~-B ..,!!.- '. 0- ~c c::. i;. ~ <,"' . ...0 -~. ~ iii o 1:" - . , . 3-< ~ ~ ::. -. ~ S ~~ . . " .. . ~ " ~ i ~ ~ '" ;... t " '" !" r- ~ Z C c en m OJ '" ::D .. m ~ :a. '"" ~.8 .. :e u: Z 1\ " ,. i: " " ,. .. m ,. ;~ " '" '" m < " '" 0 i < Ii 6 e " e III ... .. .. .. .. '" 0 m < ~ :II ,. 6 m .. ,. a c;;~ .. oO oO en ... 0 0 ..", 8 oO ... =i ,," .. .. g~ '" ... ... m .. ." ... g~ .. ... 0 C m 0 oO !i 0 IIlD !: .. .. :!!s ... .. ~ .. .. :II 0 '" .. ,. oO ,. 0 .. .. '. '" n ,. 0 .. II: :z> II: ~ m '" 0 n ): ... ii ,. oO .. F ~ " ~ '" '" " .. io ~ ~ .. ~ .. '" .. ... '" ~ III ~ ,. ." '" m!, 'l','13"!HH!!!W" Illtl ... 0 i;Fjl ii).~J::~~:i-h:!~:' i::~; iil ~ I J .,R~l!'-i.~!l ~!1! t:a -I :: e~~.I; r =1:'. =1 I. :; ~ !: h . r~. ;}~ .I~ ~ r.' u r. _-0 1 :i :~ :l~! i: ~ t d t. =-:, ~r r :.; ~, i~~l 'i , j! il to ~~ ,; i '!' iI" '[ I H ~ H~; h i H ~i iiH jJ i i' : liii il . ~ :; aitr "a C) 0 II ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ l;omn.. "'~~i: j ~. ~I ~I~ !" ~ lIllA o ~ CoO SA efti 11 ;1::: ~ ~ :\~ 1; ~ ol~ ~ .. ~ ~I;i:; .. " " a: " .. '" " '" '" ;;; p '" ~ .. 0 # <II .. ... ." ~ m .. SHOPPES OF WOOLBR~~ .rO~'~N BEACH, FLORIDA "'~r:CJ:(:::; MASTER PLAN' 'I ~ - PROPOSED /D 8 ~i ~:II E) ~Q:!j ~: "II :II'" nl; l!!m "II C ? z c c: !!l :II ~ li o m Ul Ul :II o )> c ." I ~ ~:D~ -< m aJ ... Ul :Il ,. - i5 ~lih .. z.... 0-1"11 -< ); r- a r- l=; z m : :a E != ,. C 0> ' n ~o :t- g~ o>n .,,- ~ 80' A.OW [:1; I! ~ -, I~ !i ~~ }! II !~ "'r"" Plo ",0 "'~ ~6 zZ ~== "'~ :Il ."tI z l;l .. Co> m t,tl rlt . ., : ~? Kilday It Associates Landscape Architects/Planners 1551 Forum Place Suite 100A West Palm Beach, F\o,ida 33401 (305) 689,5522 / , k~1~-/ E X H I BIT C 1/ _~_'" _.....~ c . _~' +~'~~ ~~' -. ~ '- -_.--~.. s" .,... ' ,,_.:...:;: :8:'~ m.-' , "<"l<"'~ .' - ~~ ,.~'. .. .~.,...~",J. ~-"U\iiil ,,~....~~{.ti:~"" .~,,-- l:"'''.d.=''~''::!'''~'''<"'''''''''''''''''''~'''''''''~. - . ~. ..,' ~.- -..., ,...' . ,'" ...... ~ ,".;!i- . ~ :...ioc i.. '; m . . c' ",,;.::D:%: ~, ~ : .. C .- <' 'I:'~~-' T"c. !;...z.... ~ ""'m... .---J t;"M' ~ - . ' ::~!I:~ ~g~lil 0 .. ----r~c~ II On~tJ''''' _ . '1 . t:::l~& e~,.g ~ i ,ff: ~~= ,] \,.:-&".,\ ~ f "1' , ' Jl;lS ~8~' ~ ~' ,tm ~ i'l'~ k .OlO'" /' f_ Olm ....0 ~ ,.~ /.~7 ~~ ;!!5i'(' ..P... -I. jll~i#f .... ...-:j!:;'~ i;;1!!! :::~~ -I ~ L~;~p 0 ~.o"'~ .,:11;'. ~g_;;: ~~~ m :II NOOl!~E' ~F~~~ . .... _ n )> ".., ,: . 1,/ r ~ :g 3: ~~. .. r -M 1ft i a .. ~ ~ ~.' m.. ;: o!l= tjlI "g i\; ~ If __~ ' li Z ...'\> -.. ~ :ll - J ..~n ~a g~~ ~& ~ .~~ ~- ~~~ z 1 . i~~ ~; ....~~ b~: s~~ :.,,1 ~~:g ~~~ wO-< ..~o ;C:zJ "' C ::; m o o ~ ~..... mom enO" ......~ ..c. .. ...,en ....% 1:.... ..!:! m.... ~;:o ::Z'"I:- . )IoF ...... ..mm oz" ~~:a ~",:-, wOI wc,... ~:2m -.... c"" ~g =i 0"' m ,... CJl C'l Ql i\i '"' I CD q ..J: ~~ ~;~ z 5i ~ ;~ :3' ram , ~ i z m " z n; : ~~ 0 m... I: p~ e ~; ; N::! ;JI ~ z / 1:i:' ~40 ~ c"-- Scale; l' . 80' Date: 3/28190 Drawn By: DAP File No. 42.,,, Drawing No.8 5-34 Sheel~of 2' I~ :i'- ~ ;r '-.~! 'i? ~'~\~ Jr' I ~ ~\ 1\ .' i I 1\ \, ,. ~ :.. &1.-J?lt i If' ._ II ~ II " , , 'I I ~ ~ \1 1 ~\ IF II ~ \ If 1" '''. \ I I~ 'I ~ ::;.1 ;; o ~ ~ > " ~ ~ ~ ~ ...z~ It ~~~: ~I g~i~ ~I a~~~ ~~)o ~~ ~ i '~ ," . \ ~ ~, , 0 ~ ~. i - " " =4 :.:4 .. -< n" g g z z n n ;= ;: Ii Ii II .. ell ram ~~ Ii. .~.~ n~lil: !Iil .. ""2:i!!i. .!oJ. .. eIIi~;;;:; Ill.... .. i .... rf .. ~~ It".' -t;!i.,;I~ ;;- :i!!!d~g~ It i . "~bl:' i .I' iS~ECl~:, ~tl C!loo;;:!!Illi!! _& ~~l!IU~ .~11 o. :l!;Gilii "'~ i~i6~~1 ~!-- ~1II.fD~l;:i ~: 6SlDZ~!;\" M "'DF.n F~ 10.. E:n"'O:'" . ~o{!J6zo~ . :: :4~o:llla""c: s.. =<z"~:i!iS :: 11 ~i:;;!:a i ~ "'!lJ<p!t=l'" cr; .. . zml= a. iI~ ~ i ~ z i III it ! ! ~ ~ S ~ .. 31 gill ill 8 ~ g 5 ~ >> 9 ~D t ~ ~ ~ ! iI ~ 6 -i ~ )0 m :I> ~ S b.-t~~ .. .. " n m 0 .. I: " I: !; !Il . 0 Q .. t: .. a - N ~ W ~ N ... ~ ~. , t ...= Ih ::. ~ I: ~ Ii I ... , % I ;;m J ~5 ! ~ "';I: ~ Om ," ~~I "fJ1 0 I IIHi m I!! ~ 5 ... '" rn "r !:l .. m ~ . tD ~ .... w _ w XI "ClIM~Om . oM..:o" ~ C=:::" N "-.,. s: 0 8 .. 'II .'-' \ '4~:~ ~ ~N=. CZ ..::...~w :~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ... " n .. 9 ~ . o .. N III ::"il' sOi :>7\1;; ~ 'i>1'.SI N- w. , .. w. ~.. ~ "' .. j i , , I~ Kilday & Associates Landscape Architects/Planners 1551 Forum Place Suite 100A West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (305) 689,5522 z 2 !!l :a ~ 11 o III en :a o )lo c ~i ~ ~r- :IS ,.. ~-Cm (II ~~!:!! ~ ColI'" C C) _n!. m %. ~.. Z -1 '0 -I "tt .!~ j; ... ~a r ~ z m ''" .. :v S s= "' c .. . .::;;. ,.:.; ,oJ', ,;. SHOPPES OF WOOLBRIGHT ~ P.C.O. -: .... ' . BOVNTON BE~H, FLORIDA ... '.' MASTER PLAN 1 '1 ' .1 [:' .= ) . ~ ~ ~ :; " . i~ !~ . ~ ~~ ,~ ~ " ~ m z < 6 ~ ~~ ~) ~~ Z:; ;a CIl , :It ,~ Z Gl .. , w m f,Xl:l1.B1.'f D /3 BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT Office of Professional Standards To: From: Date: Re: Tambri Heyden, Directo~ Lt. James Cummings ~ 28 February 1995 Shoppes of Woolbright, P.C.D. TRC Memo # 95-0121 The comments that I have regarding this project concern S.W. 8 Street, and the curb cuts made north of the entrance at Woolbright. Although I have no problems with the curb cuts themselves, I would like to see deceleration lanes placed at the sights of these cuts, in order to facilitate motorists, and to keep the roadway free from unnecessary congestion. 00 rn @ ~ ~ W ~ i~l; FE...... ., 8 ! Iii i i .- , II . U .;.. . l- I PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. /1 LGCAT\ON MAf HOPPES OF WOOLBR\GHT P .C.O. \ li\ U - ~-j\~~ ,_,-=-l'~, ->~ ~ F' ~~ Er:= c ~ ~\\\\\' 11t..', ;J~,..t1' ~~ ~LIDlli1,L l e,T\' 'l-\ ~,.. . \ 1 ~L .~-,~t. \ ,,' t \ ' ;..~ ~~ ~~\ Iw ~~\\r~l ~ \\Tl~\ \~\ \~ \ \ :\_l \J. \ \ ' \ . \ (\ 'I"!I\ r T.l \ to. , ~' ...- ~l[\lll.'\'''''' "l't~~C-"-'~"" , ,~."r.."""\\" ffisl~1J !<'~~."~""~~'~'~:lf 2 ~':J\ 'n ,Krt T 'I~! r' ' 1"1>-', -;::: \ -1 U ,/ I i ,,,-TT T 1/<:\ ~ ~ H - \ [.:11 t-' _ ,:l <=' .,,; /.:) ""'2 ': ~ n- \ \. :u~; ~~~~,. ..-- '9..... " ' ',~ :Jill!:: /' T l". \I., pCO ,~ ~~ T ,\. ,'" ." ,... 7'aN _ ,J9Y"oj; .,,\h ~"',' 1 " :m. .~ ,::J L _"'1, ",\'1"C~- - ,1 ' · ""' ...J F~~':::r::-- '-1, ,cf ' c:.." \ \ \ 1\ \11 \I \ IT (,lIT1? .l <' au "$" 7" ' ,./", \, 11 \I n\ \ \ 111 1'1 \ \ {'1 ,,", \ J,1=\::3'"u" ',,' '-- 1 1\ lmTI~U~ff1~b ~\ I ", P' 1 ~,~~ 1 '1~\1.~""1 .,; . .- WI \\ \~ \\\ \" 't . ~\,.. . ,.., ij.~i'/\ \ II m ~ IL- . ',' , ',,;\fu ~'" ~T' -11 ' Y;yj!f" '\ill!! ~ \f" L L"""""" <1 ~:.~~ ~ \~ rl \ 0 mmm e '~f",,~~111 ' '11 " q, ~}i'1 \111 1"\ \ \ 'i3: ~w ,1"-<-" rn 'Ul.l.'1.l ":!.(\\tlT ' "" -'-' \ ~_ '\1 ' \:: .. fj ,_," ..wn". r. :fI.1 'Ill < >~. t:t ' \P--: ... ;"m rI rTI' ,,' "j , L ' ~.,-r \ ",.-r,'1," " 'C =4 .t c ~"'.:";:: '::-.~,' ,~. I '1 ' " u ;-. l. ':'., ~;;.:rr~ ' " "'~ \_ ~'> L-' /.. _"'''''' Ii'" " h.'\' . I R~ ~I' \,,\ \ \It... ~ ~ \,,\\ "~MJ~~>~~~ '~~(!~TL..t \~-?[\ f'\J\J\:~o \- \\~al · . ,..' ,<.,;.." ,\- .:.. I \' , )/~ ,"'":'"....,',' '." ". 'J" \ \ '1 It" " . /:j:lfJ;:,,' .,,'...., ,,::,' . " \6I~Io\.- aP\G t-4"f ' ~ ~l"'~:; ~ ',' '" . \ ,,\.-P<CEtI \ ~~.~/~:1i't""~;' '-, ',~ \ \\i'v6o= 1YY/ ,-' l/./ ,,':: '" ',\\~'" ,,', ~ / . ," ' ,," \.\\ 1 ~)/ Z 1,\' . ," 1;' "~'~:\ ,- \~ \ '( ; \ ~;5IS6' ~.. <:." \ \, W \ 'il In~ \ ~i II...'; '<<5 ~ v ~, .-'- '; _;"\11 ~ ~':-' . \I~'l'Tl\ 8 ~ \I) ~ x Cl (:< (~ '. ~1J:-,:;: , S \Te. ~y, IJJ \ "Fe''''''' " _,~ ~' L~~ ,~,~~' .:' "." 1., ,.,' ~~'';;.-- :, , p:3 . l' ,,:::/--C~', C3 i 'I ,s W ,5" ".","' I .,,'8R,"d '1"X::S>> , ' : I '\ I '" 1 HI'!,1I"'! ' '- ; \.. T ' ' t r, - '.,1- ' l/)j7/_ ..;. ...-",_'\ ......... j!. .,...::IT{:/~ r-'~ .' ' . ,," !y .Lj , >- 'I ' _, -' ~ "-1<-1 w " " " iJ: I r- _ ~';'N-< \- ,.' \J ,I ~ , . 'Ff eft '.....-- ' I I ~...., ~.' " y<,.x'J~,)-I~~-" -.I L '~t '/-' . :(^X"""'.., .'" [ , ' ~: a1 ' \11\ ""~"T~' ClEC,~~>~,,':jtt:: ~ ,;J\O : -@--il-:--- ., :) _ ~ \1\ \ _\\(~_~~ -y:ds;t;i'::: ~. " -- ! E J ,/ .P'~o ,"'~ ' ~ ^ 1'Vl x~ ' - l- -, jAr/ .~ ~ ,,^ :>9X" - ~,' · , I.'~. . -: ~~....' \-"i-.~. if, J~ \_~ 3;" i ITT ~~~ ~.:?'N"'fi ~;I \ II \ c::.~ " /: 1 !/jl ~,~L. '-'- K.,'''l "" -...c "'^" v L Y v~,,,, (!-----"'/J i.--' ~ \-t' ~ I'J::HICl "'- y " ., --: w c, ,f-<fI"IC:P"'~'" ')-):' 'V " TIT '" v " !t- . _ H "1=1' 1f-4:U' 'Y~ y~'. . ' Go!<" \]~. rl' '1( ~ ~ ~ 'Y ~.(,..,:.,. n~''''': L~ ':::: ", -' v' ....... P ~'1! II 7 ~ ,," '" 1;" \:lI J .1.0 " Jc- _ .~ ....J (III /fK"rD ";.':- u...1'1 , . '~ .:: I'" 1/1 11 \ \ \ OJ ~- _ V I '\ \1 1 "1 A ,/11' 1\ \ (\) 1--:' /I 13 '0 ~/8 MILES ' 1 1 1-' : : (I. ,,' ,CD --'t:: L -::::: . . \ \ ,-.-"'lIl' 1 \ \ J : a1: 1/ '\ '\ I (I' - ,J-I ~ \\\\\ \ . I;:;>~": _ : l' "-c+,P-' \. ~ 7 ..", 1 II ' is ' .~-'" ,., &~ 't'\ 400, 800 F~E.' ,~: .' _ '\~ ~j! : ,ci I ~~ p ',j .:::: ,.L '.: .j;:" cj~ m,A"""" r. _0" 3 ,.. '\"f).:t:. '; il{ E ,: i1l" ,,', ~\., \. ..:= , " tn~ t rtiL-"ll,l: ~;;f I Ii C, ~ ll~ .\- >- "I '" l:l.,I \ \ ~ .. ,. l tL.L ' ". it (!,'t r ,~\ ~ ,~\~\. ~ _ 'L.-1'" , ~ ~~~I":\\ ~~\N<\\in\l ~ ~\~W~m ~~ tW\\\\ l~ \, ~\\,\W,\I .fTf\\\J\ Ti \ W,; ,~\~i \~' \1 ~\ ", ~ \ \ . _.c-_;~AlI I r[__,c, o ~~r:,; PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-090 TO: Chairman and Members Planning and Developemnt Board THRU: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Michael E. Haag Zoning and Site Development Administrator DATE: March 101 1995 SUBJECT: Shoppes of Woolbright PCD - File No. MPMD 95-001 Master plan modification (driveway, median cut and shift in outparcel sizes and boundaries) NATURE OF REQUEST ,\ ~ ~ 0 j'1V Jf\ ,,\ \ ,8 W' t CCL Consultants, Inc., agent for Howard R. Scharlinl trustee of the ~ property, is requesting approval to modify the previously approved ~B~~~ master plan for the Shoppes of Woolbright peD. The 31.99 acre ) 0 planned commercial development zoned property I approved for 20G I 320~ square feet of comme~cial/retail development, is located on the $":< north s ide of Woolbright Road and east of the L. W. D. D. E-4 canal. ~~ \\,/' The proposed changes, described in the attached letter from CCL " ~ - Consultantsl dated February 14/ 1995 (see Exhibit "A") are itemized ~ \).. _ t-~\ r ,- below. In addition to the changes stated in the letter of ~~ submittal I a second driveway is requested located on the east side of S. W. 8th s,treet, approximately 400 feet north of the south property line of the PCD (see Exhibit "B" - proposed master plan) : ........ 1. Subdivision of Tract C to make outbuilding 3 a separate .895 acre outparcel. Tract C is located at the northeast corner of S.W. 8th Street and Woolbright Road and south of the main entrance into the Home Depot. 2. Change in the size of the outbuilding 3 from a two-story, 6,000 square foot bank to a one-storYI 2,625 square foot drive-through, fast food restaurant. A conditional use application I as required by the zoning code I is in progress for a drive-through I fast food restaurant as the use of this outbuilding. 3. Change in the building area of outbuilding 2 from 5,000 square feet to 5/755 square feet. 4. Change in the building area of outparcel 1 from 4,300 square feet to 6/920 square feet. 5. Relocation of the existing driveway located on the east side of S.W. 8th streetl 70 feet north, from 190 feet to 260 from the south property line of the PCD. 6. Addition of a driveway on the east side of s. W. 8th Street, approximately 400 feet north of the south property line of the PCD. This driveway was requested on a previous master plan modification that was tabled by the City Commission; therefore it has been added to this request. BACKGROUND The Shoppes of Woolbright PCD is part of a November 6, 1986 and January 241 1990 stipulated settlement agreement between the city and Tradewinds Development Corporation. The City Commission ratified the settlement agreement by approving a master plan modification on May 151 1990 that depicted the applicable "r)' f'" condi tions of the January ,24, 1990 stipulation and settlement v, t~''''l>rI- ag:-eement ( see Exhibit "C"~ - raster plan pursuant to the ~990 ; T'" ~IJ st1pulated settlement agreement" The agreement vested the pro] ect ~~ ~r for trafficI water and sewer, so that no time extensions for ,f" f' ' TO: Planning and Development Board -2- March 9, 1995 concurrency would ever be requiredl prior to build-out of the property. The settlement agreement approved a maximum of 3201000 square feetl to include the uses and layout depicted on Exhibit "C" - the 1990 settlement master plan. Howeverl the 1990 master plan reflects only 315,580 square feet. Since the original settlement agreement, the following master plan modifications have been submitted for review: 1. October of 1989 request to include the addition of a building materials store (Home Depot) whioh included 102/250 square feet of retail and a 19,375 square foot garden center. The total square footage for the PCD remained unchanged at 315,580 square feet. The city Commission approved this request on November 211 1989. 2. May of 1991 - request to include the following: a. Addition of a new driveway onto woolbright Roadl located west of S.W. 8th Street; b. Change in use and size of the outparcel at the northwest corner of Woolbright Road and S.W. 8th street from 4/000 square feet of retail commercial to a 1,250 square foot gas station (this portion of the request was withdrawn by the applicant, from the submittal); c. change in size, number of stories and designation of use of the outparcel at the northeast corner of Woolbright Road and S.W. 8th street from a 4,300 square foot retail building to a two-story I 6 I 000 square foot bank with drive-through; , tJ 4'- -4 ./ d. Addition of another driveway from S.W. 8th street to the shopping center outparcels located on the east side of S.W. 8th street; e. Relocate southward the approved driveway located on the east side of S.W. 8th street that leads to the shopping center outparcels; and f. Eliminate the north access aisle connection between the outparcels located on the east side of S.W. 8th street and the Home Depot site. Tpe modtfj.ca,tions to square footage resulted in a net increase df 1,700' square feet I thereby increasing the total square footage for the PCD from 315 I 580 to .317/21l0 square feet (within the limit allowed by the 1990 settlement agreement). This request was presented to the Planning and Zoning Board (now known as the Planning and Development Board) on August 13/1991. The Board recommended approval of the request, with the exception of the additional driveway on Woolbright Road. The minutes from the August 201 1991 and September 19, 1991 city Commission meetings state that the request was tabled at the request of the City Attorney because of a pending motion in the Tradewinds case and that the City Attorney wished to confer with counsel for Tradewinds on the issue. A review of City records indicate the request was not removed from the table. 3. March of 1993 - request to include the addition of 8,745 square feet to the garden center at the home Depot. The garden center increased from 19,375 square feet to 28/120 square feet. Pursuant to the 1990 settlement agreement, the square footage of the garden center is not included as part of the retail gross leasable area. The request included adjusting property lines to accommodate the expansion and the total square footage of the project remained at 31'7l~. rtJ7 / /~ '} J /:.1~- C; ~ . Ii '? ":l"') , TO: Planning and Development Board -3- March 9, 1995 On April 201 1993 the city Commission approved the 8/745 square foot expansion subject to staff comments, and on August 101 1993 the Planning and Development board approved a waiver of platting for the adjusted property lines in connection with the expansion. 4. March of 1993 - request to include the following: a. Subdivision of Tract B to create a .957 acre outparcel. Tract B is that portion of the PCD that is located on the west side of S.W. 8th Street; b. Change in use and size of the outparcel at the northwest corner of woolbright Road and S.W. 8th Street from 4,000 square feet of retail commercial to a 3,040 square foot gas station (resurrection of the portion of the 1991 request that was withdrawn by the applicant); c. Add two new driveways into the proposed service station outparcel - one on S. W. 8th street and the other on Woolbright Road; d. Allow a canopy over the gasoline pumps to encroach the setbacks due to a difference in the service station regulations in effect in 1986 vs. the service station regulations in effect in 1993; and e. Reduce the building square footage specified on the master plan for Tract B from 62 ~ 000 to 55, 04<:; square feet. ])'S $r(jO.J ~l;~OJ) Wi th this request, the total \ s~uare footag~ - of ,the PCD decreased 6/960 square feet from ~17/ceO to ~,~20~on April 201 1993 the City Commission approved the request, subject to staff comments. As a result of the traffic evaluation of the proposed service station use, the square footage on Tract B decreased 24,000 square feet from a total of 55/040 square feet (52,000 commercial/retail plus 3,040 convenience store/gasol ine sales) to 31/040 square feet ( 28 I 000 commercial/retail plus 3,040 convenience store/gasoline sales) . Therefore I the total square footage of the PCD decreased 24/000 square feet from 310,JlO to 20g,320 square feet. 30~tP>-jO ~:;~}l,~O ANALYSIS ;.G , Changes in Planned Commercial Development (PCD) master plans are reviewed consistent with Section 6.F.13.b. of Appendix A - Zoning as follows: b. "Modifications to approved plans which result in an increase of less than ten (10) per cent in measurable impacts as determined by including any changes in traffic generated I water consumed or sewage to be collected will require review and recommendation the planning and zoning board and final approval by the city commission. The city commission decision to approve, approve with modifications or deny I shall be predicated upon a finding of consistency with the comprehensive plan and a finding that any such increase will not result in a negative impact on infrastructure delivery systems or the surrounding area in general. It is the intent of this section that all additional impacts be mitigated. ..11 Based on the documentation providedl the changes to the three outparcels would generate in excess of a ten (10) per cent increase in water consumed and sewage collectedl if the approved outparcels are evaluated against the proposed outparcels. An increase of only 2.8% in water consumed and sewage collected results if the proposed TO: Planning and Development Board -4- March 9, 1995 outparcels are evaluated against the entire PCD water and sewer impacts. In either scenario, the utility Department does not have an objection to the analysis provided and has not indicated that the increase will have a negative impact on the infrastruture delivery systems. A slight increase in pervious area will result in a minimal, positive impact on the PCD drainage. with respect to traffic, the traffic information submitted indicates that the traffic generated by the three outparcels will generate less than a ten (10) percent change. This information has been forwarded to Palm Beach County. The results of the review by the County have not been received at the time of this report. The following is an evaluation of each of the proposed changes listed on page one of this report: 1. Subdivision of Tract C to make outbuilding 3 a separate outparcel and the redistribution of square footage among the outparcels As indicated in the stipulation settlement agreement I this is acceptable. Platting or a waiver of platting (at the determination of the City Engineer) to subdivide this parcel is required. As requiredl outparcels shall be self-sufficient with respect to lot sizel setbacks, parking and other PCD zoning district requirements. 2. Relocation of the existing driveway on the east side of S.W. 8th Street, south of the main entrance into the shopping center (Home Depot) - One entrance, in addition to the main entrancel was allowed pursuant to the 1990 settlement agreement. This existing driveway is the additional driveway referenced in the agreement. The proposed location of this additional driveway is closer to the original position (centrally located) identified in the Barton-Aschman traffic report, upon which the traffic conditions of the 1990 settlement agreement were based. 3. Addition of a second driveway on the east side of S.W. 8th streetl between Woolbright Road and the main entrance to the shopping center (Home Depot) - As mentioned in previous item #21 the number of driveways is specifically limited in the 1990 settlement agreement. The addition of a second driveway is inconsistent with the 1990 settlement agreement. since the Barton-Aschman report does not require an additional driveway to be added, it could be argued that this driveway is not needed and that safety and level of service are not impaired without it. Furthermore, this type of access design is contrary to the intent and purpose of a PCDI which is to provide for a planned (not piece-meal) , programmed series of development operations, designed as a whole through integration of principle buildings -and outbuildings that are linked via common use of access and infrastructure and similar architecture and other aesthetic elements. Specifically with respect to access, this additional driveway defeats the purpose of requiring internal access roads and driveways to serve parcels within a planned development. It should also be noted that the Barton-Aschman report stated J' that thefdriveway on the east side of S.W. 8th Street located north 0 the existing main entrance driveway was to be (l deleted. The proposed master plan still reflects this ~iveway as being approved. \\ ,\ 'V ~' ~ ~ ~ ';:;\" \0,~. \~ '\4' TO: Planning and Development Board -5- March 9, 1995 4. Median cut in S. W. 8th street If approvedl this new intersection would capture much of the traffic anticipated and designed to be received by the main driveway that is located at the entrance to Home Depot. The main driveway is centrally located for the major portion of the retail uses located on the east side of S.W. 8th street. Since the Barton-Aschman report did not recommend a median cut, it could be argued that the proposed median cut is not consistent with the traffic report referenced in the 1990 settlement agreement and therefore not needed or possibly affecting level of service. Therefore, if the median cut is approvedl it is recommended that a new analysis of the turning movements be submitted to determine the impact the median cut will have on S. W. 8th street and Woolbright Road. Alsol the proposed median cut would cause the east driveway into the site to become a major driveway which requires a one hundred (100) foot throat; the distance from the property line ~_ to a parking space or an access aisle. This would ~ignificantlY impact the parking design of outbuilding 3. CONCLUSION This request was reviewed by the Technical Review Committee (TRC) on February 281 1995 and the committee raised no objections at the time. However I the committee did not have technical data regarding the impact the median cut and additional driveway would have on the surrounding roadways or the project itself. If this driveway and median cut are approved by the commission, the Police Department recommends that north and south deceleration lanes be required at the cut to avoid congestion from motorists slowing down to make ___ turns at this location (see Exhibit liD" police Department Memorandum No. 95-0121) . It is also recommended that if any changes are approved by the commission that are not reflected I or are contrary tOI the proposed master plan, that three copies of a revised master plan be submitted to the planning and zoning Department, prior to submittal of any future PCD requests. The Planning and zoning Department is not making a specific recommendation on this request since components of the request are inconsistent with the latest settlement agreement. Deviation from this agreement are viewed as policy decisions of the Commission. tjh Attachments xc: Central File A:WooIPCD C I T Y o F BOY N TON B E A C H TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AGE N D A DATE: TuesdaYI February 281 1995 TIME: 9:00 A.M. PLACE: Conference Room "C"I 2nd Floorl West Wing 1. Introduction 2. old Business NONE 3. New Business A. LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDERS (other than site plans) MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION q~~DDI I' 1. PROJECT: Shoppes of Woolbright PCD LOCATION: Woolbright Road and southwest 8th Street. DESCRIPTION: Adjustment of outparcel building square footages and various driveway accesses to them. NOTE: Written comments (on legal size paper), plans and/or documents to be returned to the Planning and Zoning Department within three (3) working days following the meeting I (FridaYI March 3, 1995 at 5:00 p.m.), unless otherwise specified below. B. REVIEW OF TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS AND PLANS RECEIVED NEW SITE PLAN 1. PROJECT: Boynton Beach Tri-Rail Station LOCATION: East of High Ridge Road just north of Gateway Boulevard. DESCRIPTION: Expanded parking and access to Boynton Beach Tri-Rail Station. 7. Other Business 8. Comments by Members 9. Adjournment The City shall furnish appropriate auxil iary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, programl or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Joyce Costello, (407)375-6013 at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. .:TRCMMTG.22f\ ),\ u) ~ t ~ g. ~ ~ a:~ Qo a:<{ WWCO 01-1- -zW (j)-(j) , ~'(>/: -. u . ; t ~ u. .;.jU) - <(0 ' ~o Wo' c: ~ .co LO ~' ~!%:~:~' 0 ' ," ,..f'." ",.'^ , e,,' ,," ,<. ....,,' I-c{ ,:".'>..,-,,;;,;,.,~ 5~ . a:w -,- . ,LL (j) , ".,..,::.:4Y':",:,: -,,,...,.. .;. ',"J ., -. .. . , ' ,,'.' .::i'::;':,.-~~~~:::~. .... .. ,.' 't~, ..;'i~~:~~~/' _ _';.~_L :~..-'--<-_-=- ;~. ,.;..' ~"',' < . ..,;' ,-+. ' .... .... - ,-' . , ','.'>: ~,;,;' ~.~ ..~.~',.,~~,. co -zW C\l '. C/)-:- C/) . I' , : C'. . ,,,,.:' . "., ,,' ~~' .... ~-i ... ... Q, .... ~D ,... -+ ~D 0 ~O +- 0 .... ~O ' ... .... ,,) '.' -' ~,.' , ,/t.;};;-~:." : __, " . .,.r ' r:.~ " ..:;...., .;.--' ,.- " P':. " _,:1, ;,: :r~ .".1 " ',-'.' ,'" :/, : :- oJ ~: ~:~~ ,~' . .....,' ,.....;l ';~:;~f. 7,.: ;.~;" . ..:~\:\ " \ ~ . -) , , ., '. ~ '- -, o co . " . ... ~. :' .'. . ~'.' .. ,~ +- .... ,. .~..- C\I -J W U c: ~ t-. :::> o ".;Li,t~~ 'I .", l ~ : ~'.':! . :1.:,' ~. . \~., ;: . 'J',',' " ',' ~..::J : : ,!~ ,'S..; 1 f'~ r..,. ,. (J) Oz ~o ro~ ~J: . ...... o q,OJ :!! c CO> m ,.-,. . s::\ f ; r~:~ ~' . ~ Smmr- Q_____ ' , g (j)li~ J---' 1111111"- I ?--, ~ ~~. ~ r: ~~~ tP C'\. ...., o~~ m to ~ ~ F ~p-l ~ -J w ~ . o;D ge , ~ I ~ ~p CD ';,m ?l.~ ~ . ~(")r- ~.. ~'2. P~*#,:p ~...~. ~~ ~)> p ~ Q~'\ Ol r- ~\C -191.92' ...~ - IJ' ~~~ -...- N,OO 24- 11~ E -- ~ . . .. ~~~ ....0, C~ n ~O~) .V..~ ,~9- "...~o ~- ....~ ,;S ~/ 20 ~ / -,p ,? .. ~~, .,. '~ 1~ --~ CO, (1)0 m3:1 . [ 3: 1"11011 , ILO/j / / "'" ... .... ~ ~ '\. ...~ ~ , ... ~I .. . J;.-. ~~c:. (") o ~ 0(3 r- m ~ :<; It '-Lt . ~ , f ~ r-'~-a . ~ mm)> , III en-- ~ r- r g oS: s--- ~ ~~ ~k.~F<~ ~ ~ ?b~ l ... !Jl b :0 ~ I\) . "'. '0 l/O ''''m "'_ .m. CD .... Oll~ ~ ~ ~!:: /:~..~ . . )OOZ~ 119'2- z m~ 7' ~...... ~ ~ b ~'-l"- _..._ --191.92'- ...:::::-.::- ~ \J> C"- 'O~ NOO 24' 11. E ~ "1'\ - ...... ~ .. .' fJ) Oz ~O I" ro~ ~::t · ft .... . g.as I . :D If a . Q 1 m , . I I 1 ~~~\-. .. '.. I . .. '.. II '.-', Co) l::: '" '" ..~ i\ ... .,.... .... ~, .... 0 ~ ".". '" -,$- c; 'f.o;, ~'S' ... (11 r 1;~ -:r ", ", 4- ~1 ~ ~.-: q> m -" Q) )00 '" Ul c;Lo.... ~ 0, (1l ~ ~c.i ,... ~ '. ~ ~ ~ ~ ....". /~ro <" ~ ....0 ~ \ (g 5- \ :::0.; /\ ce, '6 ~ ~ o r- o:J -'!. , ?o.. "" \ \ '-l-t ---~~._---------------- - ------,-_.~---'~. ~.- -.--- < . . .. . (j) Oz ~o ro~ ~:I: . .... o q,tD ;D a G> m t' ~~ '.., '(~ ~.,. ~~ o ;, o r- OJ ;0, C5 ~ X -I ~1 -;, ~ . I I I ~1 ..... f s~~.~ ~:' ,~~ ! 1 g (1)03: '~~ ~\.. 11111111~" ?-- ~ 5::E ~ . Ar cJlt.~ ~I m, ~)> ~,. ~ ~ CC:~m ~ O.'fw.O'~) to ~ I\) F p~~ m ....6.1 Q. ,\,\~f) -..J ~ ?'. ""l :D ,'I' · Cf r ~ g:D ;;:: y. ~'~m ~~P go ,;5"\"~ e" ;'J.~ /:~S; y~ /' (B~~ ~ri:" ~i"'';::::- b . z m..........- =!J ~'\~. ~ ~ ~ ~'>J~ _..._ -191.92'- ...~ ~ va c~ Q(J:. NOO 24' 1r E t\ ~?-'>J'I __ S ..,. 0) coo;'f"'" 10 " ..... ...... --;1 COI (1)0 m3:1 , . [~l, ~ Icn~V/ ' I "T1~ I . ~-// / / 'v ... :;: y.. 1.~ ~ ~'r ~ " "" '. cp m ..J.0l )> N~ o:o~ ~ 'o,()I ~ ~c.i r- ~ , ", '. ~ , ~ ~ ~~ -, :':. '.. ,.\ c.l " 0 \ \. \ \\ ,-~.,.....-:J 01, 01 I' .1 , I -f ' , ~. s JL 1ul( u It J