Loading...
CORRESPONDENCE - CORRESPONDENCE/ , LETTERS C 1Q.1t4 UJ8fT%. ~I~'''' ,.i....-. BOOSE CASCf I - _~~.... r J.ll ....A- ;......"".:cv.~ ,. ",,- , _._ _ ,...cIII..""nPUfI -......,.~ ~ __ .-.. Mo1ICl1. ~ ..,. - ........ ~.o. ..... WUIT ~..-. ~ :aa..... ~ C'Atl--- OItI:OOl"'~, KI.-o. F','" ~~ ($I') SJ2.55IIXJ 'fIlZ.CC'-tP: (561) 820-038' . -. . ~., March 20. 1998 VIA FAX: 9u- 77t-4m. lames C1=oL Esquire Iosias" Goren 3099 8th Commercial Blvd., Suite 200 Ft. Laudenial~ Florida 33108 k Woolbright pCD - Jadustrialkcess Road Dear Tun: CcmfirmUlg our convcrsdon of yesterday afternoon. aDd in an effort to resolve the Uming and ancillary iJsues mmnmdiDI the: COJISt111CtioD or the iDdu&tria1 access road, we would like to offer the following mgption- to the City ofBoymaJ1 B.n Home Depot ~ Design Center ("Home Expo")wiU comtruct the iDdusuial access road as teflcctcd on their approved sUe plan. For that remaining portion of the indusuial aa.c:ss lOad fjom the tcrmiDus of the road as sbowu by the l!ome Expo site plan to the property D, my c1ieat will obcain a cercified cost estimate fi'om CaulSetd &. Wheeler, Home ExpolS project eogincer, and that sum of tl1O'Df:Y .m be given to the City for the comtn1ction of the reavainder of the road. If and when a milroad aossiI1g is en:r IpJU'OVfJCI in that locations tha funds em be used for the completion of the projeGt. If.sucl1 approwl is not forthcoming, the City may utilize such funds Cor any other appropriuc public; purpose. As you ~ my diml will deal dkcct1y with Pete Mazzc1lA on th~ approval of the certified estimate. We beJicwe this is the most p~ approach to resolvhtg thialong-standing issue, l1r~ Ga1Oo5ory S. Kino GSlUag 27564 cc: Pete MF-I1-, AssistBDt to Utilities Director (J75'()Z9S) Michael MortOD (5611141..0646) ~ City of ~oynton 13eac/i -~-'~--- m @ ~ D ~r'-i"~~ ~""'4=. I r;"" _:" l~ i'. :;f 100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beadr. 'Boufeva.rtl 'P.O. 'BD~310 'Boynton 'Beadi.11oritla 33425-0310 City 9lDll: (407) 375-6000 ~;U: (407) 375-6090 ~ [i/ .; i ....... i I '~.-~- November 14, 1996 VIA: FACSIMILE Willie M, Swoope Impact Fee Coordinator Palm Beach County Financial Management & Budget Office 301 North Olive Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Dear Mr. Swoope: Pursuant to your October 21, 1996 letter, the final item requested, which was the statement of Tradewinds current approved development plan segregated into permitable units is attached. If you have any further questions, please contact City Attorney James Cherat at 954-771-4500, Sincerely, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH i~ (k":<i-' I1Jtu JLL-- Carrie Parker Hill City Manager CPH:jc 51rTUrUa S gateway to tfu guIfstream. H " r 1 / ; A .' I /-/ V /1' / Y( "-. ,.. ('.... ~)_ ) ~\...,..., 'i( '/ .. ' '-- '/ j .. {, - k '\ 1'-- -.. ". !~'I ,- ' " . 1 · ' , , . i.h''- i /, /\ .~'J -, ,r v V1 (I" L\-,~"lV :,; r~.I.' ('.... , 'e) v - 11, ,/i_ ~ - ;; J L' . L- I '^/v~.. . l ". LX. T. : c"f. I C..../ L' , 1r' -. '()~. . "vr" ' ,';7 u p .~/ cc: Jim Cherof Bill Hukill Tambri Heyden Mike Morton S'CM\CARRIE\SWOOPE' WPD ~ ~ j:l.,. ~ ~ f o ~ ~ ~ Q Q ~ o ~ j:l.,. < E-o Z ~ ~ U r:J'J. Q ~ ~ ~ Q ~ E-o ~ o z ~ o Q ::cd < ~ ~ == u ... ~ ~ ~'& '<~ ~~ E-i ~ c~ '" U "0 .a l:! - Zl '" u '" 00 l' ~4: O"g' "'0 l'2~ 0\ . c\~ ~':"ti5 ::;) ~ > S ~ S ;::~U C~~ ~]~ Q.....Cl ~&Su '" ... ... ~E-o u u '" u ... '" U~ ~ Eo-....... E7S 'S :s ~..c..c '" '" u u ... ... u u ~~~ ~~O CI.l ~n~ 1;.,)- '< u ~t: '" u ... u '" .,... - N N r<'I oo"ii u u u U ~ ~ ~ Q.,Q.,Q., U=,=,'5 i:!OOO E- Zl '" u '" ~ 00 4:4:4:: 0"0"0" '" '" '" ~~~ ";v;iN "0 "0 ~ U '" (;j u ,5;.! ]] 88 u u '" '" :;:l:;:l Q.,Q.,Q., ~~rn .d 0" '" II"l l' - r<'I (;j ... C '" ... ~ '" u ... "0 o .s .!. '" .s ... .s ca e f5: '" Q., ~ I ..; '" u ~ ~ ~ ... u OIl ... &l '" u ... ~ 00 - 0\ o c ,sa (;j ~ u o(:! OIl C ~ ... '" Q., 4: 4:g' 0"0 "'N 0_ .,... ("l.00 N o ... -~ I C ... U ou frc Q~ u ... 8 '" oCl ::to(:! := 'S ,Q := ] en U ... U '" r<'I ""! l' en U ... ~ r<'I C! r<'I Q ~ u '" .. E- u '" .. E- .,... r<'I r<'I ;,;i ~ ..sed' ;S~ ~~ u.,... .~ ,..... '" ]~ "* ~. u.,... ]~ en 0" U en ~o c.- en--:. r<'I 3""" ~ed' U 0" ~ en o~ U . . .,... caN ,gotf 'S: g' ] l< '<i) 4: 0" en ~ - l' .,... - ... U a U u '- o ... U -g '~ U ~ Q., ~ en U .. U '" N 00 r<'I - ~ u '" .. E- .,... 0\ o ' .4: ~ 0" - en o o ::= ~ ~ f:3 is c ~ ::;) ~ ~ c ~ Q.. ~ ~ Eo-. ~ ~ ~ ~ :.J u '" ~ -- ...:l<< ~. N 1;.,)-"0 '< IIJ 0 :t:~Q., Q..~Ci Zl '8 ::l ..; fir N .,... N I - U en '" .c Q., en ~ '8 ;> U ~ ... - ] '" U ... U '" \0 0\ r-- - ~ U 'S: e ... '" Q. OIl ,5 o OIl ... U 1 >- a U t: ::l u Zl '~ ~ \0 0\ N = U ~ if en ~ '8 ;> U ~ Q., ~ '" U ... ~ - 0\ .,... - ~ N "0 o Q., Zl '~ U C. ~ :E ] ] ... '" Q. ... .s "0 U ~ U 'S: U ... ~ :8 >- a U ... ... ::l u Zl '8 ::l ..; U "0 '- en r<'I 00 N ... '" i:i: U u '" i:i: ... .c OIl 'C ..c "0 o ~ Q., ~ '" U ... ~ .,... C! ~ - "0 o Q., Zl '~ l< U Q. ,g \0 - Q., ~ en e ~ r<'I r<'I r<'I r<'I "0 o Q., ... ~ a U 8 U r .. ~ '" ~ Q., ~ '" U ... ~ ~ 00 ~ u '" .. E-o "ii u .. '" c. .c ~ .E u Q., ~ en U ... U '" 00 - ~ - u.. u '" .. E- IIJ > .. IIJ '" e c. -. c; > o 1-0 c.. c.. cu -- I:: cu c.. Q.) .... '1i) Q., :::E II ~ en ~ t '" o '" z Z o N o;j '" z Z z < en IIJ .. U '" o .,... o -. c; > o 1-0 c.. c.. cu -- UJ I:: cu c.. 1-0 Q.) .... (I) cu e II ~ ::E ::; :< 2 ~ :;; u C': .. E- = '- %e City of t:Boynton t:Beacfi 100 '1:, '.Boynton '.Beach '.Boulevard P.O, '.Boi(31O '.Boynton '.Beach, 1"foritla 33425-0310 City:Jfa{[; (407) 375-6000 1"JU; (407) 375-6090 July 5, 1995 Mr. Michael Morton Morton Group 902 Clint Moore Road Suite 124 Boca Raton, Florida 33487 RE: Woolbright Place PUD and Shoppes of Woolbright PCD (Traffic) File Nos. 470 and 469 Dear Mr. Morton: Today I received your June 28, 1995, letter regarding our recent meeting, pertaining to the above referenced matter. There are statements in your letter that need clarification. The 1990 Barton Aschman Traffic Analysis does include trips for the church, therefore, as stated at our most recent meeting, any proposal (master plan modification, site plan, conditional use, etc.) that indicates a use or density/intensity of use not anticipated in the 1990 study, must be accompanied by a revised traffic study, which analyzes differences in traffic to be generated. It is not permissible to transfer trips to other IIland uses ", as you refer to it, within a master plan, if doing so renders the portion of the master plan, from which trips are transferred, undevelopable due to no associated traffic capacity. Also, it was discussed that a traffic letter, stating simply the number of trips generated by a proposed use, would be turned in with each request for approval, such as the Taco Bell application in progress, for staff to monitor the build-out of both master plans, as determined by the 1990 study. This has not yet been received for the Taco Bell application, as was agreed. What was agreed to be delayed was a fully revised traffic study to be submitted when a master plan modification is filed for either the 14 acre commercial site, north of Home Depot, or the conversion of the church parcel to a different use. YlmerUa's (jateway to tfu (julfstream Page 2 Michael Morton RE: Woolbright Place PUD and Shoppes of Woolbright PCD At this meeting, I also indicated that I would notify you regarding whether your property on Boynton Beach Boulevard would fall under the State law change that became effective July 1, 1995, for'small scale land use amendments. The answer is yes, therefore, no State review would be required for a land use change on the property. Very truly yours, ~~~2M;;~ Planning and Zoning Director TJH:arw xc: Taco Bell File .:m,lIorton,tjh ~~ .Do....\. UJ\.!I.......} J. ......J!dJJ.\ J.d..~ I PHO:-ot: 407.994.3133 -.fAX; 40i-241-0646. March 27, 1995 Via Fax (407) 375-6011 Carrie Parker. City Manager City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425 Re: Woolbright Place Letters of Credit Dear Ms. Parker, We have the following Letters of Credit in place with the City which are due to expire. No. 1322 Lake Excavation No. 1337 Force Main Relocation No. 1417 S.W. 8th Street Coostruction No. 1323 Blowing Sand & Restoration No. 1416 Park Impact 1. The dJainage lake excavation is now 100% complete, the final survey is being prepared and should be submitted (2) two weeks from this date. This Letter of Credit should be reduced to S1O,OOO.OO and extended for (90) ninety days. 2. The force main relocation work bas been completed~ the Letter of Credit need not be renewed 3. The constnlction ofS.W. 8th Street is 70% complete as of this date. this Letter of Credit should be reduced proportionately to $100,000.00 aDd extended for 180 days. 4. Blowing sand restoration will remain at $30.000.00 for (1) one year. S.The Park Fee of$60,OOO.00 has been paid to the City, therefore, this Letter ofCredlt need not be renewed. Please contact me as soon ~ ,oSSlble to review the procedure for appl J and submissi f the above. c.c. James Cherof Howard Scbarlin rrfte City of $oynton $eacli 100 T... 'Boynton 'Beadt. 'Boukvartl PD. 'Bo~31O 'Boynton 'Beadt., 1'CorUfa 33425'-0310 City 1fafl: (407) 375-6000 1'!JlX: (407) 375-6090 May 26, 1994 Ms. Bettina Scherer Development Ass't., Trammel Crow Residential 6400 Congress Avenue, Suite 2000 Boca Raton, Florida 33487 RE: Woolbright Place PUD (Plat No.1) - File No. 508 Dear Ms. Scherer: As requested in your May 19, 1994 letter, the following information is provided in response to your seven question: 1. Master plan modification process - A master plan modification is only needed if development of the PUD deviates from the approved master plan (i.e. - unit type, number of units, setbacks, buffers, etc.). Since your letter indicated that Trammel Crow is interested in developing a portion of the site for apartments, most likely a master plan modification would not be needed prior to site plan submittal. I would need a sketch of your proposal to answer this question definitively. However, if a master plan modification were necessary, 12 sets of the modified master plan drawings are required, accompanied by a letter of request, which summarizes the modifications, and a $500 processing fee. This process before the Technical Review Committee, City commission and Planning and Development Board, respectively, takes approximately 1 1/2 - 2 months and if necessary, is required prior to site plan submittal. 2. S.W. 8th Street accesp - Pursuant to the approved master plan, access is available from S.W. 8th Street. Access points to the residential pods are shown on the master plan. 3. Concurrency and hook-up fees - The project is vested for concurrency. For hook-up fee information, please contact Peter Mazzella of the utilities Department (407)-375-6404. 5l~rica's (jauway to the (julfstream Page 2 May 26, 1994 4. Drainage - I do not know Ken Kruger, however on-site drainage is required and there is a master storm water system existing (I'm not sure whether it is complete - the Engineering Department would know the status of this infrastructure) which serves not only the PUD, but the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD to the south. The current development plans that were approved with the Woolbright Place PUD, Plat No.1, final plat and the Shoppes of Woolbright final plat are filed in the Engineering Department, (407)-375-6280, and can be viewed to analyze the drainage system. 5. Open space - There is no open space requirement within the residential pods of the PUD. 6. Wildlife - No wildlife issues remain outstanding. 7. Development order, development agreement or impact fee agreement - The approved master plan and final plat, which reflect the accepted, development terms are the most recent, valid development orders affecting the property. Unfortunately, this office does not have the equipment to copy the 24" x 36" master plan, last revised 10/30/90, therefore, one is not attached and the Engineering Department must be contacted regarding the final plat. The Building Department, (407)-375-6350, can be contacted for impact fee information and a schedule. Other than these documents, development of the property is subject to court ordered, stipulation and settlement agreements (Tradewinds Development Corporation vs. The City of Boynton Beach, Case No. 86-3661). I believe the aforementioned documents would be adequate, however if copies of the stipulation and settlement agreements serve your need, the City Clerk can be contacted at (407)-375- 6060. If you need additional information, please contact me at (407)- 375-6260. ~ Y7J J I.de-,J Tambri J. He~~ ~' Planning and Zoning Director tjh A:WPlacInq TCR TRAMMEl.l. CROW RESIDENTIAl. 6400 Congress Avenue Suite 2000 Boca Raton, FL 334H7 (407) 997 -9700 FAX (407) 997-H(,,19 May 19, 1994 Ms. Tambri Heyden City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FI 33425-0310 Re: Woolbright Place PUD Dear Ms. Heyden: Thank you for your time on the telephone last week. As you know, Trammell Crow is currently considering developing a portion of the referenced site for apartments and resident recreation facilities. At your suggestion, I spent a short while in your office obtaining copies of various codes, however, I would appreciate a written response to the following questions: 1. 2. 3. 4. The entire site includes approximately 48 acres and pursuant to the approved PUD Master Plan will allow for 640 apartment units and 16 duplexes to be built thereon. It is my understanding that a modification of the master plan will need to be submitted and that this process occurs at the time of site plan submittal. Is their an application process or form for this modification? Please confirm the availability of access off SW 8th Street. I believe that the project has been vested for concurrency but that fees are required for hook-up etc. Is this correct? vince Finizio indicated that Ken Kruger with CCL can supply the necessary information with respect to drainage. We will need to know whether any on site drainage is required. 5. I believe there are no open space requirements as such has been met? Can you confirm this for us? 6. Are there any wildlife issues to be addressed? 7. Is there a development order, development agreements or impact fee agreements in effect for this property, and if there are, can I obtain copies? ill 00 MAY 2 3 .. Page 2 May 19, 1994 Thank you in advance for your input and assistance in this matter. I look forward to working with you on this new development. S~/JelY, S;; Be~her~r ~evelopment Assistant cc: bb file C. Ray Phelan 707 Canal Way Boynton Beach,Florida 33426 March 19, 1994 Tambri Heyden Senior Planner Planning Department P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida Dear Ms. Heyden, This is to confirm our meeting in early February concerning the berm along the property line between Palm beach Liesureville and the Trade Winds development. This berm, according to the master plan of the Trade Winds Woolbright subdivisio~ is to be 25' wide and 5' high and planted with foliage common to the area to effect a screen. At the present time this berm has been partially constructed along S.W. 8th street to within 200 feet of the south east corner of Liesureville lot 32304 or 700 Canal Way. The berm is not complete along the short south east boundry of Liesureville. Further, contiguous to my property, on the south east boundry (lot 32526 or 707 canal way) are 3 Hibiscus trees(Seaside Mahoe) that will help shield my home from electro magnetic field radiating from the 138,000 volt Florida Power and Light transmission line. This transmission line is being relocated,at present, and will be within 75' of my home. These trees are, according to Kevin Halahan, forester for the city of Boynton, specimen trees that should be preserved. These trees are within the right of way of the 25' berm. Consideration must be given in the proper con- struction of the berm to protect these trees. Please keep me informed as to the developments concerning the construction of the berm. I appreciate your help in this matter. Very truly yours, C. Ray Phelan iJ1U City of 13oynton tJ3eacn - OFFICE OF THE CITY AT70RNEY (407) 738-7405 I ~__J~_ ~ ^ ~ij~..lw-- ~-r ~ 100 '1:. 'Boynton ~ 1Joukvani P.O. ~JJO 'Boynton '&iJ&, 1fqriia 33425.0310 City?fJJfI: (407) 734.8111 7~: (40i) 738.7459 November 30, 1992 John R. Beranek, Esq. P.O. Drawer 11307 Tallahassee, FL 32302 Re: Tradewinds Development Corp. Dear Mr. Beranek: I have had no word from you since my letter to you dated October 6, 1992, regarding the above matter. I enclose a copy of the same for your review. Please feel free to contact me if you wish to discuss the same. Very truly yours, ~ , 'Ii,. (J (I, ' .-..( ~ f I '-..'.' I, . .~ lL . I '///. t(c (- ,,-.. { , James A. Cherof City Attorney JAC/ral Ene. cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager Chris Cutro, City Planner ...,:.. Via Facsimile & Regular Mail 'Me E~ T'IT:'f'~ .1 . .LIA.~ NOV 3 () PLANNING O'~T. - ,'imeri.cas yateway to t/ie yu(/,trcam rzne City of flJoynton 'Beacli - OFFICE OF THE CITY AT70RNEY (407) 738- 7 405 100 'E. 'Boyn~ '&IJlIJ 'BouUvari 'P.O. ~310 tJJoyntcn '1kadt, 1"fcrida 33425.0310 City '}{dj: (407) 734.8111 1":<<: {407} 738.7459 October 6, 1992 John R. Beranek, Esq. P.O. Drawer 11307 Tallahassee, FL 32302 Re: Tradewinds Development Corp. Dear Mr. Beranek: Your client, Michael Morton, contacted the City Planning & zoning Director and suggested that we have another meeting to discuss the Tradewind development. I am certainly amenable to that meeting if it helps to resolve the outstanding dispute. My secretary will contact you with some available dates to meet. Prior to such meeting I would like a written update of the status of your client's negotiations with Mr. Winchester. Addi tionally, I would like confirmation that your client has obtained the wet line permits which have now been available for many, m~ny months. Finally, I would like an agenda of the issues your client would like to discuss at that meeting. Very truly yours, I _ ! , . / James A. Cherof City Attorney JAC/ral Via Facsimile & Reg. Mail ,qnunCQ's (jQUi./.'ay to tne yufj.'tream %e City of 13oynton 'Beacli . ) c- ~~ ~ yv/ f (k ;/' 1 ( Planning &' Zoning 'Department 100 'E. f}joynton f}jeadi f}joufevara P.O. f}jo't,31O f}joynton f}juu:fr., :Fforida 33425-0310 (407) 738-7490, :F!JlX: (407) 738-7459 March 24, 1992 Mr. Michael Morton Tradewinds Group congress Corporate Plaza 902 Clint Moore Road, suite 124 Boca Raton, FL 33487 Dear Michael, This is to inform you that a service station or a business that sells gasoline is an allowable use in the commercial portions of the Tradewinds development. This use would be subject to the ordinance that were in effect at the time that the Tradewinds determination was made by the Court. I do not have an exact date for this but it was sometime in 1986. This use is subject to site plan review and final approval by the planning and Zoning Board and City Commission. Finally, this interpretation is subject to review by the City Attorney. I hope this letter is of some help to you. If you should have any questions, please feel free to call me. Yours truly, C"t~ ~.Jtr - Christopher cutro, AICP Planning and Zoning Director CC:cp Jimericas gateway to the guf/stream " ""77J 1'~/.1/~.~ B:Jard of County Commissioners Mary McCarty, Chair Ken 1. Foster, Vice Chairman Karen T. Marcus Carol A. Roberts Warren H. Newell Burt Aaronson Maude Ford Lee County Administrator Robert Weisman December 15, 1993 Community Services Department Housing &: Community Development Ms. Becky T. Edwards, Vice President CEO Construction, Inc. 2200 Lucerne Way, Suite 250 Maitland, Florida 32751 Re: Proposed Voolbriaht Road p., U. D.; Boynton leach" Florida Dear Ms. Edwards: I am in receipt of your recent correspondence, in which you forwarded for staff's review, the "particulars" of 'lbe Crossings at Woolbright. Hy stalf has reviewed the proposed project and is content that the project ts consistent with the affordable housing needs of both the County and tfae municipality of Boynton Beach. Attached for your information is tile Palm Beach County response for Form 12, Local Government Planning Effort, for both the State Apartment Incentive Loan Program/Low-income Housing Tax Credit Program (SAIL/LIHTC) Application. As noted, Palm Beach County, pursuant to its own Comprehensive Plan, has enacted various affordable housing initiatives. Additionally, the County has acted in response to the State Housing Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) Program. Please note that pursuant to conversations with the Florida Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) , copies of all referenced language~ ordinances, etc., will not be required, as the expense is burdensome. Should you require additional information or further clarification, please contact me personally or Chauncey Taylor, II, Hanager of Planning, at (4Q7) 233-3616. ~ J 2. \ \993 Remar H. Harvin, Director Housing and C~unity Develo~ent (HCD) RMH/CT/mlr Enclosure ccs: Hr. Hr. Hr. J. Scott Hiller, City Hanaler, City of Boynton Beach Chris Cuatro, President, Cuatro and Associates RECEIVED Chauncey Taylor, II, Hanager, PS, HCD Ref: LTRBB. PUD/PLS DEe 1 l' CITY MANAGER'S OFfiCE "An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer" : ' .. @ pflnted on recycled paper 3323 Belvedere Road, Bldg. 501 West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 weAL GOVERNMENT PLANNING EFFORTS Initiatives currently in place in Palm Beach County and the City of Boynton Beach include: 1. Palm Beach County Affordable Housing Ordinance 93-8 was adopted 5/18/93 to meet F .S. 420. 2. Palm Beach Co~ty has a Local Housing Assistance Plan as specified in s. 420.9072 (2). 3. Palm Beach County has not adopted its Incentive Plan but has already acted to address provision.c; as required under the Incentive Plan as required by the 1989 Palm Beach Comity Comprehensive Plan. 4. Palm Beach County adopted a new expedited permitting process in 1992 and included the addition of the Director of Housing and Community Development to the Development Review Committee to facilitate the review of affordable housing developments. Please refer to the Unified Land Development Code Article 5 and Section 4.4 respectively. The City of Boynton Beach provided for an expedited site plan review and approval process for the subject site by City Resolution # '. 5. Though Palm Beach County has determined it would not be possible to waiver/reduce impact fees for affordable housing without jeopardizing the legality of their Impact Fee Ordinance. several alternatives have been adopted. First the bases of the impact fee assessment for residential property is the square footage of the unit thus minimizing the fee for smaller more affordable housing construction. Secondly. Palm Beach County has made alternative funding sources available for impact fee payments for very low and low income units through the adopted Robert Pinchuck Memorial Affordable Housing Trust Fund. Please refer to Unified Land Development Code Article 10 and Ordinance 93-8. For the City of Boynton Beach oontribution, please see letter from City Manager. paragraph l'eferencing "Impact Fee Reduc~ion and Density Bonus". 6. Palm Beach County has adopted the Voluntary Density Bonus Program which allows increases in permitted density in exchange for the provision of very low and low income housing. Please refer to the Unified Land Development Code Section 6.9. 7. Palm Beach County has adopted the Traffic Performance Standards Special Methodology for Affordable Housing which allows a reduction in the level of service that must be met for development meeting specified criteria. Please refer to the Unified Land Development Code Section 7. 9(I)J . 8. Under the Palm Beach County Transfer of Development Rights. program, densities are only permitted to increase by two units up to eight dwelling units per acre unless very low/low income housing is to be constructed. Please refer to the Unified Land Development Code Section 6.10. 9. Palm Beach County allows reduction in the setback requirements for affordable housing under Section 6.5 and Section 6.8. Boynton Beach provides for similar reduction as part of the P. U. D. Process or by variance. 10. Zero lot line configurations are permitted in the Unified Land Development Code under Section 6.4. Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances permits zero lot line configurations. 11. Not applicable. 12. Palm Beach County typically includes a review for the housing impacts of policy, plan and code revisions, however the process for policy review not related to the plan and code amendments is not formalized. Boynton Beach reviews its codes for policy, plan and code revisions that may affect affordable housing and adopts the changes as needed (Comprehensive Plan). . 13. As required by the 1989 Comprehensive Plan, Palm Beach County maintains an inventory of surplus county owned land and sites are made available for affordable housing development through Property and Real Estate Management. 14. Palm Beach County property and Real Estate Management does provide sites to Housing and Community Development at no cost/low cost for affordable housing development. 15. Palm Beach County provides ad valorem dollars (as mandated) through the Comprehensive Plan) and Voluntary Density Program applicants provide any in-lieu contributions to the Affordable Housing Trust Fund. 12/02/93 09:38 tt40i 2t~ oue MORTON GROUP IaI 001 rao '0: MEMO ROM: Scott Miller, City ~f Boynton Beach DATE: RE: Michael Morton, Woolbright P1ace Venture Ncv~mber 3D, 1993 CITY COUNCIL MEETING (ATTACHED MEMORANDUM) As di :ussed before the Council,r ha.ve reduced to writing a synopsis of same F the issues that we presented November 2nd. r ;i!S actful1y ~equest that we be put on the counC11 ager.dd ~or December 7th.. >r further C1; scuss ions and reso he. : f .yo j)t!ve any c:uestfcns and need to meet pr 10r to Tuesde.y I : can be a"a~.L }7e YOU MondaYr December 6th anytime. /. ~). M1chae Morton MM:gl" Attach:ent cc: J ;:'11 Cheraf H ~Clrd Scharl'fn , ~ ~..,. /,). -?-1".; (;.~ 1.:;.1 j>'vv-- , . '/,':',. ,'-' ,> r../ .-! t~ " t I.~:: f... .,/"...:,.,.,.,,,,,. -- . , ... '~ -', ,J-. -'7....<:.. r~-i.~) ~ " ~';./~,. ~ -(;", '<c t, _~...... /3' . /:..~ :?l~;~~ - ..l;~"'_d;'\ (:~_-,._: C:t (;..._~) , I - ti-t ,"_ :-.;'y~""...t".,""""""'-- f) j.i I' ,. -l. L(~ .- j: ,;/..-: - r:' :.:-..!." .,. '" i'..4:.......-... ..- . .j ~.. J ,; ",-1 he. f...~": -.t- . j ~- '" :. I~ -~....: - }.., ( - -~ _ ~ ... J '-" it; \,j _0 RECEIVED DEe 2 I /.1 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE .& - _._,...._.....t. B'i1~A.I<i aMtMCl' _~_ - '-' '- ... ..., MEMORANDUM NO. 93-398 TO: Tambri Heyden, Acting Director of Planning & zoning Don Jaeger, Building Official Jim White, City Engineer Pete Mazzella, Assistant to the Utilities Director Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist FROM: J. Scott Miller City Manager DATE: December 7, 1993 SUBJECT: TRADEWINDS Attached hereto please find a copy of a memorandum dated November 30, 1993 from Michael Morton, Woolbright Place Venture, to my attention, providing a written synopsis of the issues that he presented to the City Commission at their regular City Commission meeting of November 2, 1993. ~ I would ask that you please carefully review said transcript and respond in writing to those specific items that pertain to your department only capitalize if you have not adequately and comprehensively covered that issue in your previously written memorandum. In essence, please check the issues to your former communication to be sure that all bases are covered. Please respond to this office by December 10, 1993. Thank you. ?s~J JSM: smb Attachment c: Mayor & City Commission John Guidry, Director of Utilities Mike Haag, Zoning & Site Development Administrator Charles Frederick, Director of Parks & Recreation ill ~@~ow i'C' ut. 00 "-' 12/02/93 09:39 tt40i 241 0646 MORTON GROUP !4I003 - .---.... ';/\:l.~ I-'U..t: November : ';1, 1993 Pa.~e Two 1. VEST) liS ISSUE - AFFIRMATION The. U.O. and P.C.D. whi~h comprise this project was vested by ayree~nt to Ncember 1985 and f'atified by the County. This window ~Jf t1me a.PP!leS to bt not limited to a 11 issues of thh project inclucttng p 1annmg, zOl'l,ir . subdivis:: ion oY'din.nces, I.ltil ity fees I permit fees, CJty a~:f cOt.:n1.' impact feu, ate. the premise is had ~e been al10wed to bU11d tt\15 prcjE t in 1986 a.s we should have, those were the fees ir. effect. .We Shc.u' not be subject to new fee! or fee increases that became effectlve SUbSE uently Nov~~er 1986. 2. ENV I~NMeNrAL rSSi:JES - AFFIRMATiON The ( s"tatu prope exeav torto proce 5> ;t.e 1 a.k,e not i p'tepa the c group ty, county and Floridll F'ish and Game all agreed upon the vesting of this project in 198e. Florida Fish & Game signed off on the ty ~nd the City was to issue clearing, grubbing, grading and tion permits for both the P..U.D. and p.C.n. After ~esolving gopher se and scrub jay concerns by relocation 01 the gopher tortoises, w~ ded to construct trte Home Depot faci1ity, cieared ~ortions of the or lJtiHty installation, g:~ading and drainage, and axca...ated the arce1 to about 75% of completion. The City has agreed that we do we environl1lenta 1 issues and we can continue forward with the ~"tion and sae deve10pment for the project. It would be h,=lpful if ty staff C1'fd not consult with or assist the local environmental whicn attempt to tamper with the agreements in place. -, .:: I MOO!F :ATION OF S.~. 8~ STREET CONSTRUCTION * ?resel:ly S.W. 8th Street is to be constructed (4) lanes :.tp to the enG Oftr. P. C.O., transition to (3) la.nes to the end of tr:~ ;).U .0. The right Jf way gillen for the road is for four (4) lanes. However the likel. rood of constructing (4) lanes through Lake Boynton Estates to Boyrrtc Beach Bou'ievard would require extens"f',e acquisition of right of ....ay. 1 ierefore. at thfs time it would ~e safer to transition !'lOwn from 4 lanES :0 2 la.nes 1:1'lrough the P,U4D. to Oc:ean Avenue. If a,t any time in the fl ure the county or city want.s to 4 lane to Boynton Bea,h B1vd.r Qur 4 lane R.O.~. will of course be in place. . 12/02;93 09:39 ~ .., i~EMO TO: MEMO FRCII: DATE: t!407 241 0646 141002 MORTO~ GROl.iP W' ." ~NORANDUII City of Boynton Beach City Commissioners City Ma.nager Michael Morton Nov. 30 I 1993 RE: ~OQLBRIGHT PLACE V~NTURE PUBlIC HEARING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES Thank YCIU 'cr al10wing me the opport:.lnity to address the Comm1ssior. :uesday, :~o\lembeY'ld, ~eg-ardi!lg issues relat'ive to clar1f1cat1o.n of the settlement .accords rE cheri in 1990. As I stated t the property owners are concerned that the City: :off take a pas~t'fve patn w~len presentee! t...ith pianning, en9tn.eering ,~nd con:st .Jction matters and expec11t1cus1y process same as agreea 1n our lariou~ 51ipulations. '-" As the Cc 3e"~anek 11(1 .ct'!l; set.t 1 ~ 1ave gone ,)!'l beha If .Schar 1 in c ~e~)o 1 vat le rhE~refQre the Clty ~ that are commission .~ mfss10n has been made awa':-e, Jim Cherof and our attorney, John e been l:lefore Judg@ Edward Garrison who maintains jurisdiction over lent agreement and its implementation and as per his directi'{e, iNe ;-:) mediation on two occasions before Judce Silverman. Lynn ~1ats.cn of the Comnissiofi, Chris. Cutro, our respective attorneys I l-Ioward d myse If attended same and it was agreed that the issues '..were a 11 several have been, several remain, some new issues have arose. n the spirit or our ongoing good faith and conciliatory ,;ffo':"ts, ld this deveicper should resolve the questions andinterpl"etations :urrently outstanding. I tr~id to present a synopsis to the and as agreed, I am fo llow'bg through ~..,;th thi 3 memoranoum. 12/02/93 09:41 'C'407 241 0646 MORTON GROUP ~005 ~~ NC1vember 30 1993 Page Four 6. SrGNAG,. ON 1-95 -* At mea P.C.D. the ';S ~.. i nC:le propl!r p ro }~C with t ation an accord was reached to allow a sign facing I-95 for this pro ject on 1 and acqu ired ei ther from E 1 s i e & Bill ;~ ; tlchester or railroad. We had negotiated for the purchase of a portio" of the ter property and from CSX which would give us continuity of y and ownership to our P.C.D. and erect signage to ~dentify the and its ma.jor tenants. At this time, .we would like to proceed at project with the commissi.ons appro'n 1. 7., MASu~ =L.AN MODIFICATIONS P.C.D./P.U.O. i: >r lie u{ mas tier s",bmit the 5 appro... ,lan i Plasti We arE time Q It was each t AClM, bs i ng exteno 8" suggesting that nther ha'/ing to $1.tbmit a mod.ification of the plan each Time we s-ite p1.lr'l a por-ticn of the ;Jroperty that we the mc:dificatio'n when that section ~5 complete. F(lr e~ample on era portion of oUr P.C.D. west of S~ 8th Street, having received 1 for the 1 aCY'e service station site, we provided d new master corporating same. When we r'ece"ived approval for the L 4 acre Acme site, we were &sked to again provide a master plan modification. not objecting to showing these projects on a new plan bu~ to tne d expense of pr-ocesslng each time which c:auses adCl1tional delays. apparent to Chris Cutro that this wou1d delay our approval process me, agreeing it should net have to be done. As in the case with ;he delays ha.ve ended up with both the developer and the City this ~axpayer as they dec~ded not to build as completion time d too late into the season. LANcse PE BUFFER US WALL Along he West property lin~ of the 5 acre P.C.D" a great deal a~ time and e) ense was put into designing a suitable landscaping buffer ~ather tliat a 0'0" wall. Plans were subraitted and approved aml the berm a.long with . :nclscaping material was installed in 199Q. It was agreed that ther'e n: y be a wa 11 between the 15 a.cre P. C. D. pa.rCEI 1 at the North s i ae and Sc !th end of the 48 acre P. U. D. A 11 tn; s was done with counc i 1 appr~v 1 at public hearings. RESERV TION OF Sr~cR & WATER CAPACITY g,. Affirm t;on by council and 1etter from City Util1ties Dept. that capacity will b reserved and avai~a.ble fo?' th~s project iJnti: it 1:; completed. ........... 12/02/93 09:40 ...... !!407 241 0646 ~004 MORTON GROUP ,., ''WI1 '."J..:i t"\!!3 November 30, 1993 PagE~ Three 4. INOCSl IAL ACCESS ROAD This 1 lad is an SO.OI R.O.H. between tne P.C.D. and P.U.D. running East from . w. 8th Street to the CSX rail road tracks a long I-gS. We have ask~dhe court to aba.ndon tl'li $ iCiad as it ser\les no purpose, the 0.0. T. and ri lraad have firmly indicated they will not grant a crossing at this loeit . In. Documents support irlg this have been submitted to the courts. Weha a not aggressively pursued the matter so a.s not to affect tne Wil1c:h, ;ter property east of the 'l"ailr04d by elimineting :.his aCCESS complt ;elv. We h~l/e worked with MS. MU:son and Chris Citro at mediat10rt to am cable 'l"eso lye thfs ;s'l.le. The cOtmlission needs .:c rat~fy our mad+f. :ation to th~ P.C.D. Master Plan to reflect. same. 6a.sical1v as per the a~ :ached sketch, we are ir.carporating the access road ana the-service road ~h ind the shopping center into one road. Paving tlli s area with road ~y ; ng of the a,pne.1t typ. that \IIOU 1 d be usea for the road had it. been onstr-uc:ted. Tnis gives us the ability to move ~he bu i lc1ing 5tr~lC:~ Ire to the north property 1ine, lIlainta1ns access should Wlncnester ever';:hieve the rail crossing and e11m1nates what is now a f:no mans 80.0' :orridor of paved. road which probably wi 11 never be used except for n 1 eg~' dump 1 ng t ca.r rac1 ng, teenagers hano out or whatever. A new maSl:e1 plan reflect1ng ttlis change will be sUOmitted when we finalize our s1te 1 i:an with the retail use or user for this parcel. The concept needs to I,e approved now as to al10w the site plan to be developed with this changi incorporated. We would b'!e e1im;nat~ing the letter af credit in place ~r this road. * '-' .:K '-' ... ~ - . USES In l~ negot of ii dens; . Howevl that ~xeru' land s tr-i C' tha. i: 1 i I1tlill1' agrE!el u!e 0 MaeDol e.W!y'e ~~e p j THE P.C.O. DISTRICT 6 what is referred to as the first 'settl9lDent a.greement, was ltad and executed by all parties. That agreement nas the product Irotracted n.Qgotiilt~on ",hie!'! produced a sign'ifieartt reduction of i, intensity and uses and cOll1promises for the P.U.D. and p.C.O. , as th@ pOlitics then dictateo) the city unfortunate1y reneged an :~r@el1\t9nt with a new sett 1 Qnlent agreef11ent negotia.ted. 'i'! 1989 -lnd td in 1990. Tne 1990 agrcem~nt restored cnenges to the density, 'ses, square footage, etc. and ~fer' to the 1986 settlerr~nt :iya.s a poine of beginning. It was the 01:515 for which the lawsuit lS implemented, and the 1990 ~greement completely restructur~ the ,ion of the parties :Nhen execl.Ited in 19.90. . One element in the 1986 mt changed by the 1990 agr-eement, wh ich has oeen quest 1 oned the our out parce1s fo,- fast food facilities such as Kenny Rogers, 11<1s, Burger King, auto related uses, etc. We r:eM staff to be i:hat these are allowable uses as our unaeriying comprehensive land in and the approval for this project is a P.C.D./C-3 destg1atian. 12/02/93 09:41 , t W' .. ~ * "407 24.1 0646 MORTON GROUP ~ 006 ~~ NOvelllbl'" 30, 1993 Page F' 'e 10. EJ ,'EOITe:O PROCESSING STIPULATION 11. Kl d to Ifflrm this proce.s so as not to cause a problom like we ha.. had w1 h Acmo Plastic.. There is an executed stipul.t;on in Place that needs tc he clarifie~ to include development an,:! const~llct:on permits. 2 ~RE COMMERCIAL PARCEl~ aOmON BEACH BOULEVARD . Th · parcel was to be reZoned to C-2 iI$ per Our mediation agT@eme.ti h. 're Judge Silverman. The proc... .hould ha.e begun last ~ar, hO'~ver, we were trying to find an end user far the property th~ matte~ ~(a! not Dressed at that time. Uses that ~re considered were a) mill; wal ~house; b) 1fmfted COmmercial; c) medical Dff1c:e: d) .-.ralk in medical ee, :er. The processing needs to begin now. fl'lere are other questions th~ halle and wi 11 come up and 1'lged reso lye I and obvious'iy if we can work the through with staff we ""i J 1, if not wi 11 of COurse have the opp rtunity to bring to the COQRisslon at ?ub11c Forum. ,""" ~ ., .." ..." ..""" 12/0%/93 09: 38 t!407 :' A 0846 KORTON GROUP iii o.n r t ~ roo '0: MEMO ROM: DAlE: ~E: Scott Mfller, City ~ Boynton Beach Michael Morton, Woclbri~ht Place Venture Nov~mber 30, 1993 CITY COUNCIL MEETING (ATTACHED MEMORANDUM) -- As di cussed before the council, ! have reduced to writing a synopsis of some f tne issues that we presented NDvember 2nd. r res actfu11y request that we be put on the cQunCil agend~ ~o; December 7th, )r further c1 i scuss ions and reso he. :f yo ..Dave any Questfons ;nd need to meet prior to Tuesd~y, I can be ava: k}7e YOU Monday, December 6th anytime. S~:~l. ~, Michae. Morton M~:gl" Attach tnt cc: Ji;lI Cherot H ,>lard Scharlin /,).-?-f:.~ C-~ /.Sf ~ - fl.:;"';-tJi,f jt.e:;':CI":"(4~:f-.> , . _ ' .J ~ p.z ....J ~. f, '.'" ,/; ,", .'".-1 h.<!- ~~<_.,~ I ",.",...,~.,..., ._-t~ .-....'t... ,.....~ .' " -.. i~'. ...... .... ....,....., , II. ' " . - d.-.I-;.4 r ,-...2.> ~~.^')-"~;_.. -r ';;'.-.ci't;_"Y~ -.. ~ .....",... '7".r-..-.... ". ) . . - - .' I. ' \ :3 ~/. ,_ ..1-,,;.'..,_,:.. ('j--:";.,.; /~.r ........._, . -. I t1.~ Lool. J J - c;'f'+," h ... - i,:"y~.",,",,......,",.'- I,,,,,,~- z, t - :'_;,r . . RECEIVED DEe 2 /.1 I CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE ,6. ...,A. .. ..", . MEMORANDUM RO. 93-398 . . TO: Tambri Heyden, Acting Director of Planning & Zoning Don Jaeger, Building Official ~ Jim White, City Engineer \. '$::l Pete Mazzella, Assistant to the Utilitie . ~ctO& Kevin Hallahan, ForesterjEnvironmentali t,j 0--1}. /~ ~ /'t..... roo o~ ~...., 'i; I'.l' . I .G.~ <J,~. \Z' ~~. ".,,;~..:t~ <v? 1::;...;:C.Qj:.-J ~~ I;::". -.'.~~ -',;'.. ....; ,. , . ',. ...""' &,,, ! ."..f... ...... "",. -- I. ~,/ .~?>;~.,: ,q,.. ..--- /~~,) ~~; j"---:"'f \ " ;.,'..../ '('-':'_~-~~./ - FROM: J. Scott Miller City Manager DATE: December 7, 1993 SUBJECT: TRADEWIRDS Attached hereto please find a copy of a memorandum dated November 30, 1993 from Michael Morton, Woolbright Place Venture, to my attention, providing a written synopsis of the issues that he presented to the City Commission at their regular City Commission meeting of November 2, 1993. I would ask that you please carefully review said transcript and respond in writing to those specific items that pertain to your department only capitalize if you have not adequately and comprehensively covered that issue in your previously written memorandum. In essence, please check the issues to your former communication to be sure that all bases are covered. Please respond to this office by December 10, 1993. Thank you. fS~; - JSM: smb Attachment c: Mayor & City Commission John Guidry, Director of Utilities Mike Haag, Zoning & Site Development Administrator Charles Frederick, Director of Parks & Recreation 12/0Z/93 09:.u fJ'407 241 0846 IORTON GROUP ~006 .. t. . ~~ ( . . Novemb, · 30, 1993 Page F! 'e 10. fJ .IEOITED PROCESSING STIPULATION Nf I,d to affirm thil process so as not to cause.. problt:HIl l1ke we h'ave had w1 h Acme Plastic~. There is an executed stipulation in place that needs to be clarif;e~ to include development and cQnst~uct:on permits. . 11. 2 :AE COMMERCIAL PARCEL, BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD Th '1 per-eel was to be rezon!d to C-2 as per our mediation !greetllent$ be >To Judge S j hel'llllln · The proc.ss shou 1 d have begun 1 as t JI".r, frOl ~ver, we were trying to find .n end user for the property th~ marte-%" \'(a~ not Dressed at that time. Uses that were cons1dered were a) mini wal ~house; b) 1imfted commercial: e) medical off1ce: d) NaJk in meciieal ee, :er. The processing needs to begin now. fhere ar~ other questions th~ have and will come up and need re~olvel and obvious1y if we can work the. through with sta.ff ~ wi III if not wi 11 of COUrse have the cpp rtunity to bring to the commission at ?ublic Forum. " t~ .---- RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #93-361 TO: Chris Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director K~jf- FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist RE: Woolbright Place PUD Letter - R.W. Realty Sales, Inc. (August 18, 1993 September 7, 1993 DATE: This memorandum is in reference to the above letter item #10, discussion of any environmental/protected species issues. The attached letter indicates that there are some concerns about a federally protected bird species on this property (Florida Scrub Jay). The birds are migratory and may only be passing through the property. The agency in this letter (Florida Game and Fresh Water Commission) have complete jurisdiction over how the land owner must proceed for compliance. The representative from R.W. Realty Sales, Inc. should contact Melanie Steinkamp, Biological Scientist III, at #470-778-5094. Attachment KH:ad ~~Il.~ l' - L .. .. 0;:; .."~: ~ ~ \0., + "'''''I~!t'O FLORIDA GAME AND FRESH WATER FIsH COMMISSION @..~HE @~o ; - ~. ',s \':1. '. ,,', eJ \e; , .~l \. o/! . "}~~.~7?,.~.~.."~~>-' MRS. GILBERT W. HUMPHREY JOE MARLIN HILLIARD Miccosukee Clewiston J. BEN ROWE Gainesville \ JULIE K. MORRIS QUINTON L. HEDGEPETH, DDS Sarasota Miami ROBERT M. BRANTLY, Executive Director' ALLAN L. EGBERT, Ph.D., Assistant Exec~ive Director rAUB r12 .. \ ~ \ , ., .'. 110 43rd Avenue, S.W. Vero Beach, Florida 32968 August 9, 1993 '. Mr. Michael Morton Tradewinds Group 902 Clintmoore Road, Suite Boca Raton, FL 33487 '''-. .......t ~..~_~.._.,.-~ " 124 Re: Scrub jay sighting, proposed PUD, Palm Beach County Dear Mr. Morton, Staff with the Office of Environmental Services of the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission (GFC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) sighted a scrub jay, a state and federally-listed species, on property associated with a proposed PUD, at the intersection of 1-95 and Woolbrite Road, north of an existing Home Depot. Chapter 39-27.002(4) Florida Administrative Code, and the U.S. Endangered Species Act of 1973 provide for the protection of listed species; therefore, to avoid a taking~ surveys for scrub jays must be completed and the GFC and USFWS contacted for coordination prior to project initiation. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (407) 778-5094, or Jane Tutton with the USFWS at (407) 562-3909. Sincerely, ~2lf~ Melanie Steinkamp Biological Scientist III MS/rs ENV 2-1-1/6 j ayboy. ind enclosure cc: Jane Tutton, USFWS Kevin Hallahan, Parks and Recreation City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33435 Chris Cutro, Planning Director City of Boynton Beach 1943 - 1993 50 YEARS AS STEWARD OF FLORIDA'S FISH AND WILDLIFE / . (jJ~ ~;J7U7/>t--- MEMORANDUM NO. 93-348 TO: Tambri Heyden, Acting Director of Planning & Zoning Don Jaeger, Building Official Jim White, City Engineer Pete Mazzella, Assistant to the Utilities Director Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist FROM: J. Scott Miller, City Manager DATE: November 8, 1993 SUBJECT: TRADEWINDS Attached hereto please find a copy of the verbatim transcript of the Michael Morton discussion from the November 2, 1993 regular City Commission meeting. I would ask that you please carefully review this transcript and respond in writing as to the status/progress of those specific items that pertain to your department. As you mayor may not be aware, Mr. Morton is claiming the items he notes (starting on page 4) as outstanding issues that need be resolved reference this development. Please respond to this office by November 19, 1993. Thank you. ~ JSM: smb c: Mayor & City Commission John Guidry, Director of Utilities Mike, Haag, Zoning & Site Development Administrator Charles Frederick, Director of Parks & Recreation ,1ik Ck!/,~ J~ ~ f' CrU2jY- {J~l / -) / -,..? WCe(! /~ 'S ,. 1 s-;-r<:. 1\)0..; "--- I ~'"\:i, iA_~yt 1--! (,- \. '. ,! , ' Mayo r: Matson: Morton: VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT FROM NOVEMBER 2, 1993 CITY COMMISSION MTG. Re: Disc. with Michael Morton - Shoppes of Woolbright All right, we'll move on. Request of Michael Morton reference relief from the construction of the buffer wall on the west boundary of the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD (landscaped buffer preferred) . Here we go again. Good evening Mayor and members of the City Conmission. Wel('e on the agenda tonight and I guess the heading is just part of what we wanted to discuss. live had several meetings with the City Attorney and I had a meeting with the City Manager and I had a brief meeting with Conmissioner Matson. The issues that came up were... back in October of 1991, Mr. Cherof and my attorneys, John Boranick, myself and I believe Conmissioner Matson, we met with Judge Garrison to try to clarify some of the outstanding issues that we still had that probably were going back to 1986 and then possibly clarified in the 1990 Agreements between the City of Boynton and this Woolbright Place PUD and PCD. Subsequent to that meeting with Judge Garrison, he suggested or ordered, I don't recall exactly how he worded it, that the City sit in mediation with us and we had two mediation sessions. And during that time Chris Cutro and Lynne Matson attended, as did Jim Cherof. And we made a lot of progress. The problem was the recession and timing and we kind of got bogged down and the issues have been sitting around since February or March of 1992. And it's only been in a recent timeframe that the real estate market is starting to re- emerge and we've seen some activity on some of these properties. Sitting through the meeting this evening I heard some of the problems that are faced by Mel Simon and Eddie Deutsch in Quantum Park and 11m sure a lot of other developers that have been in Palm Beach County and other places in South Florida have felt the effects of this recession. We certainly have too. One of the problems that we tried to resolve was issues concerning expediting the approval process for some of the submissions that we might make. And on this last submission that we had, it was for a com- pany called Acme Plastics which currently resides in an industrial district here in Boynton Beach. And we would have liked to have a 10,000 sq. ft. facility built on a 5 acre out parcel. I experienced a lot of cooperation with the City staff and with Mr. Cherof and Mr. Miller, however, we did get bogged down on several issues that could have been I think more easily resolved. And at a meeting we had three weeks ago I was asked by the (sounds like) owner-to-be of that property, Mr. Levinson, that if... please ask the City to expedite these penmits, otherwise it might be too late for him to be able to go ahead with this project. And we had a full blown meeting with Scott, Jim Cherof and Scott brought members of the staff. Tambri came to that meeting as well. And Pete Mazzella I recall. Problems came up and subsequently we still have not gotten the penmits for that building. It's not all the City's fault. I take some of the blame because there were some issues which welve tried to resolve but it seemed that new issues kept coming up. As of today, we no longer have the Acme Plastics contract. They've elected to cancel that and I know the City and the developers and the owners put in a lot of time and effort to -1- Verbatim Transcript from 11/2/93 City Commission Meeting Morton: (con't) Matson: Morton: Matson: Cherof: Matson: Morton: Matson: Voice: Morton: Matson: Morton: Mayo r: Morton: Mayo r : Morton: get this done. And I feel that it's unfortunate that there were some very minor issues that just cou1dnlt be handled to make this thing happen. Putting all of that aside for the moment, these mediation hearings that we attended... we had a list of issues. There were probably 16 or 18 issues that were on the table. And I just want to run through a couple of them. Actually, 1111 run through the whole list and we can pick the ones that we'd like to discuss tonight or come back at the next meeting. Can I ask you a question Michael? Just for a minute... Yes. ...and Jim... as part of the appointed mediation team I don't recall this item 1. Was that something that we had discussed in mediation? No. The first item is not. Okay. It just didn't look familiar and I.... Which item? Item.. . .. .buffer... Oh, the buffer wall? Yeah. Okay. I guess the buffer wall appears on the agenda but let me go to the buffer wall and let's put that one to rest first. Back in 1986 when we used to fill up the Chambers with proponents and non- proponents of this project, one of the major issues was how to pro- tect the constituents in Leisurevil1e from what would be presented in this project. And that was both for the commercial and for the residential. And part of the discussions at that time led to the relocation of S.W. 8th Street. This large six acre drainage lake that we installed.... Ah, Michael... the only thing really at issue here is the buffer wall. Not all the other.... No, they're all at issue Mayor. The only thing on the agenda is the buffer wall. Well that's a misnomer. I discussed this with Mr. Cherof. I mean I'd be happy to you know go through... the buffer wall was one item but the rest of the items need to be discussed as well. -2- Verbatim Transcript from 11/2/93 City Commission Meeting Mayo r: Aguila: Morton: Aguila: Morton: Miller: Mayo r : Mi 11 er: Morton: Miller: Mayor: Mi 11 er: Mayo r: Aguila: Mayo r: Well, but the only thing on the agenda is the buffer wall on the west boundary. That's all we have on the agenda. We're not here to discuss all the other problems... if there are problems. Technically the Mayor is correct. Is there some reason why we need to discuss the other items tonight? Has the urgency now left by virtue of Acme leaving? Could we do this some other time? I mean I have nothing in here except conversation about a wall. I think the discussions that I had with both Jim and Scott were that we had all of these outstanding issues that need to be resolved. Why only the one appears on the agenda is puzzling to me but the wall was one of the issues for Acme Plastics and... So the other items don't necessarily... are for Acme... No, the other items are in general. I had discussed bringing up... coming before the City Council and addressing the City Council over all of these items and the wall and landscape berm was one of the items that particularly pertained to Acme Plastics... to our master plan. The reason why the wall is on is because thatls the only outstanding issue that I have. Basically through our letter dated October 22, 1993 from the City Attorney... you do not address any other separate issues so if you were to ask me to write down what the other issues are, I wouldn't be able to do that. I wouldn't want to go into the other... I know that but 11m just saying that that's the reason why the wall is the only item on. Okay. Let me make the following suggestion if I might. Rather than get into a situation this evening where we canlt just move along and perhaps some of these issues might be clarified for you before the next meeting. Why don't we put this back on the agenda for the next City Council meeting and by that time perhaps Mr. Cherof and Mr. Miller and I could have met and gone over this list of outstanding issues. Ah, just for the record, I'd like to have a list of those issues. All right. Okay? That will be fine. You two get together to talk about it... For the record, weill have a... we can have a record of it right now of what you claim are at issue... -3- Verbatim Transcript from 11/2/93 City Commission Meeting Morton: Mayor: Morton: Mayo r: Morton: Yeah, well Mayor, I was going to suggest that I run through the list and then we'll have an idea. Well, let's not talk... just run through the list, list the list and let's not talk about every individual item, just give us your wish list, the items that you claim are in contention. Okay, I'm not... I don't think it's a wish list. I think that these items were items that were contemplated under six years of litigation. It's not really a wish list. Ah, the number one item on my list was the divesting of PUD and PCO, back to November of 1986. And what divesting ULJ:he .'#.im;lQ\~LOf__tilmLrga.lJ.Y__CE!Jated to as far as pl anni ng i ssueh_z.o_nll19j._~sJJ~~L.SYQdjytsLor1_QLcftr:tances ~ and Acme's permit fees ._and a 11 the othe r fees that wou 1 d... may have come along the pike since the 1986 Settlement Agreement was put into effect. 4I=i ~nlnc1 ~ l(.,i.n~ t.:...l,u) Uht Number two on my 1i st were envi ronrn.en.tgJis..s.u.es. that were di scussed . back in 1986 and through 1990 when the Settlement Agreement went ~. ~ into effect. That included all our permits, clearing, grubbing, excavation, removal of gopher tortoises, scrub jays, etc. One of fltU1n;i/1, the problems that we just recently ran into in that particular fC'yc.'-;fe arena was that for some reason after havi ng had the scrub jay issue p. J) ...-- come up in 1990, it suddenly reared it's head again and it needs to :.Y-4--:;, be examined as to why it did, who did and the reasons for it and ~:~ try to put this to bed as well. (' Number three on my list was we had discussed this several times in the past and it's in our agreements and that's the ~servation of sewer and water capacity for thi~pco~~ I don't believe thefeTs a problem in that area. I believe that the City has adequate sewer and water. .~::;,,/ lcfir 1=10->111,' 11m sure you do. And it's not an issue but I just want, that was one of the items that was on our mediation list. Ah, the next item I have is master ~.~- I plan modifil"'i'ltion~ aa..truL.e.C.lLanrl PliO. And that was on the letter that I recently signed to try to expedite the Acme Plastics t:1CUdJ"/lr situation. And that was an issue that came up before the Planning & Zoning Board as to how these master plan modifications should be made. Chris Cutro had a comment that he put forth at the Planning & Zoning Board but it's not to... we haven't resolved that issue yet but I did sign the letter which indicated that the City Council needed to pass their judgement on that. The next issue is the land~~ap1L-Qyffer verses the six foot wall on the PCO property 1 i nee That is on the agenda-fcfn;ghl~ Back in 4F <:__j 1986, as I stated earlier, the City and the Leisurevi1le folks, Joe Molina, etc., were very concerned as to what would be facing the ~JJ, . Leisurevi11e folks and that's when we came up with moving S.W. 8th ,Ldldl- Street, putting in a drainage lake and putting a landscaped berm in lieu of a wall. And we spent a lot of time and money in developing plans, brought them before the City Council and it was approved -4- Verbatim Transcript from 11/2/93 City Commission Meeting Morton: (con't) that there be a major landscaped benm installed. The benm would be about six to eight feet high, earth benm, and then on top of it would be landscaping material to buffer the Leisureville project. In going through this Acme plan, what we found was that even though the master plan showed this landscaped benm, the subdivision ordi- nance was in conflict with that and we suggested we bring the issue before the City Council and try to get a clarification. The next thing on the list was the notification of the S.W. 8th =ft G Street road (inaudible word). The original contemplation in our . .f:1'7:\. agre7ments was that..s.W. 8th Street wo~ld be a four lanF' road ~nt.Uirllrl, runnlng through the PCD and then transltioned down to three lane~. and the City was going to acquire right-of-ways to_run through Laka ~oynton Estates up to Boynton Beach Blvd. and eventually we-we~ giving up a four lane right-of-way~ We were building three lanes and they were gonna build three lanes through Lake Boynton Estates. And that has since been... on some other agenda... and that... not about to happen. So the suggestion that I brought up was that perhaps we transition the four lanes down to two lanes at this time so we don1t create a major thorough-fare through Lake Boynton Estates. I al ready addressed theexpe~Lte~roce~liJlg and the sti -..4F '7 ,- pulation that the City entered into with us about processing our Ok-cL- plans expeditiously. One of the items that was important to us was Pt.iU ,i",., modification of the PCD, the major portion of the PCD and the d_ ___1'1/1'1:) industrial access rn~n that1s on the north side of the PCD. We ~ ~ . brought that issue before the courts in 1991. We discussed it at -M-:C~le:VT.1- length at mediation. lid like to get that issue also resolved. how~'111Y1..~ that industrial access road can be incorporated into the PCD. Ah, the next issue on my list is the 1986 Settlement Agreement wa~ jnrorporated as part of the 1990 Se~~ent Agr~ements for reference only because that's where the lawsuit began, in 1986 and then tenminated with the 1990 Settlement Agreement. In the 1986 Agreement there are references to certain things which we didn't agree to in the 1990 and may need some clarification by the City Council. One of the items was in 1986 there's a part of our appro- val process, we agreed there would be no fast food stores on the commercial property. However, that was by reference in the 1990 Settlement Agreement and in the 1990 it was contemplated that on the out parcel there could be fast foods. One of the items which may have been a wish list, Mayor, was, so I might as well adddress it now, was that.we had come before the City Council with a proposal to put a.pylon along 1-95. And unfor- tunately it came just before election time and it was a good idea not to pursue it. But we discussed this pylon at mediation or some sort of signage along 1-95 which would be similar to that that Quantum Park enjoys just up the block from us. ::ftc.' , I C~rcJ fLu J n Ii ~. *-;i ,.......... . (__~ Ie ~:~i~ (Cf, . 1 . :L'....;I' rd '12. - I .J ~,,-i..I{.-1il'r Ah, the next issue is on Boynton Beach Blvd., we had a six acre tract and during our negotiations and meetings the City acquired three and a half acres of our six acres to be used as a City park <'-ff// r<.c c . "[:;1. . I ,iu h),t.' -5- Verbatim Transcript from 11/2/93 City Commission Meeting Morton: (can't) Miller: Morton: Mi 11 er: Morton: Miller: Morton: Mayo r : Morton: Mayo r: Mill er: Mayor: Mill er: Mayor: Aguila: Mayor~ Ag u i1 a : and the developer, as the developer, I donated a half an acre to the Dick Webber Child Abuse Center so they could build a facility on a half acre of the land and that left us with two acres. That two acres was part o f--1he-'lledia..t. ; on process to be zoned ~Ltb__~9me uses that would be commensurate with what else is on Boynton Beacll Blvd. in that area and we never quite finished getting that discussed. Now what has now come up is that the Dick Webber Center has chosen not to go ahead with building that facility and has reverted that half acre back to us and that the City has informed me that they won't be building a park on the three and a half acres and want to give that back to me as well. So we might have an issue of what we should do with the six acres of land. No we havenlt. No we haven't. Okay... What have we done... 11m... We haven't given any land back to you. No. It's not that you're giving it back to me. Under the agreement I think you're telling me that I get it back for $60,000. No we don't. That's not what the agreement says.... Okay... well, this is why 11m here tonight, so we can interpret what the agreement says... Wait a minute. Welre only discussing the items that are on your list at this point in time to get them into the record. Welre actually only here for the buffer wall and nothing else. Okay, well, 11m for that Mayor. No problem. And I think we opened the door, Mr. Manager, by putting all these.... No, I didn't ask for the record. I said he could very easily have done it with a letter. He could have. I think so too. Okay? There also could have been a letter... Actually, in effect this is just taking a lot of time when all of these things could have been incorporated in a letter. You're almost done with the list so why not... Go ahead.... ... so we can move on. -6- Verbatim Transcript from 11/2/93 City Commission Meeting Morton: Voice: Aguil a: Morton: Matson: Cherof: Matson: Morton: Matson: Morton: Matson: Morton: Thank you. Donlt be too sure he's almost done... Well I'm counting... he's at 12... he said 16... I think this works better than a letter because this way we can kind of see how we all feel about things on my list. The next item ~i/ is Jetters of credit which have been posted with the City at ' . - various times since 1986 for various portions of this project. And -En?;,. you received a letter today stating that some of our letters of U~J( credi t have expi red and I III make sure that gets taken care of. ~l I,j; 1'1 My last item is how we address under these f~ture uses, PUD and ~I~ PCD, so that we don't end up having another Acme where we spend a ~ lot of time and we can't get things approved. And have various 1A site plans for different types of uses on the PCD and different llctnrl ;" types of modifications to the PUD and I wanted to get some clarifi- cation from the City Council as to those uses. And basically that's the list. And Mayor I apologize if I kind of blind sided you with this, but I thought that this was something that I discussed previously with the City Attorney. Urn, when we were in mediation, I donlt recall not only the wall but the fast food item coming up. Was that part of... do you have that in writing from Mr. Branick anywhere? No. The list gets longer... Michael... ...becomes a wish list you know... that's true. It's seven years of each of us trying to develop a property in the City in a way that would work for both the City and for the developers. My only point is we sat down as a mediation team in front of a Judge with your attorney and our attorney and the zoning director at the time and myself as an appointed mediator and I think we were mediating in good faith but now there are other things thrown in here that we never even discussed and... Well Lynne you're referring to fast foods and the reason why they came up was... ... the buffer wall... ...the reason why the fast foods came up was because in some conver- sation I had recently with the City they referred back to this 1986 Agreement which prohibited fast foods in the PCD and the 1990 j-t-/ Agreement does not prohibit that. That's the only reason that didn't come up in mediation. It was a new issue. And as far as d'-..Jl.x-. the buffer wall, the original landscaped buffer was approved and I -7- Verbatim Transcript from 11/2/93 City Commission Meeting Morton: (conlt) Matson: Morton: Agu il a: Mayor: Aguila: Cherof: Mayor: Cherof: Mayo r : Aguila: Morton: Walshak: Aguila: the idea being that Leisurevi11e would have preferred to see a landscaped buffer rather than a six foot high wall. And we sub- mitted the plan and got it approved. Do we have a record of that approval? Well, we1re all going through our records now to try to find where those plans are. That was back in 1986. It seems to me that the logical thing to do is what you just did, you.ve provided us the list for the record. Letls muddle through and see what the merits are of each point. I mean, a couple of things caught my attention that I don't like, but if 11m stuck with, 11m stuck with. We 11 1 et IS. .. . We need to sit down and talk about them and of course we canlt do that tonight for a lot of technical reasons. But 1etls find out what the answers are to these things... Mayor, 1111 be happy to resume the mediation process that we started before. Most of these items were discussed. Many of them were left with Mr. Morton having to take action with other property owners, ah, pursue some regulatory agencies with respect to the water and sewer. These are all things that can all be wrapped up... .... at issue.... Weill pursue that in a meeting with him and bring it back to you as a package. That will be fine. Now, the wall. To the wall. Urn, not having seen previous history, 11m uncomfortable making a decision on the wall. 1111 tell you frankly, if you look at the wall that is just on the other side of the canal, which is where the bank... ... the eye center... an eye center. Thatls the eye center. ... where theylve been putting all the graffiti on the walls. Frankly it seems to me it would be very difficult for these guys to do graffiti, to put graffiti on an eight foot berm covered in landscaping. And I would think that the folks at Leisurevi1le would rather see that. But 11m speaking out of term. I wasn't at the meeting and I donlt know what they said and I don1t know what you agreed to. I donlt have it in front of me. 11m not going to decide on that. -8- Verbatim Transcript from 11/2/93 City Commission Meeting Morton: Matson: Morton: Matson: Aguil a: Mayor: Ag u il a : Mayor: Agu il a: Mo rton: Aguil a: Morton: Ag u i1 a : Morton: Mayo r: Aguil a: Hayon. Matson: Cherof: Well, I agreed to the landscaped benm and that's what we wanted to put in. I think we just got hung up on a technicality on the sub- division ordinances different than what was approved on the master plan. Well my... If I heard the Mayor corre~tly he said noise travels over walls and he likes benms too, so... My feeling is that if we've got an approval somewhere welve got to have it in minutes. It's gotta be in minutes. If you can't find the plan that's been approved, itls got to be in the minutes somewhere. If you can't produce the plan, you can't enforce it. That's right. So give us a chance to dig this stuff up and... Weill revisit this issue. As far as 11m concerned with the graf- fiti, walls are not always the best choice. Now the urgency of the wall was Acme Plastics. Acme has chosen to ba il out.... At this time they seem to have walked away... ...so there's... Well I think there's an urgency now to try to get all of these issues resolved as quickly as possible. I agree. The real estate climate is changing and perhaps if we got these behind us now we wouldn't have to deal with them on an individual basis in the future. I'd like to be able to come back to the next session of the City Council and get all of these items in a form of solution. Weill get as many as we can. It depends on you providing and us providing the necessary infor- mation to make an intelligent decision. Exactly. 00 we have to go back to mediation? I think that's the best fonmat to discuss it. To get all the issues on the table. To get staffls input on it. And then to -9- Verbatim Transcript from 11/2/93 City Commission Meeting Cherof: (con't) Matson: Morton: Mayor: Matson: Mayo r: Matson: Walshak: Aguila: Walshak: Aguil a: Matson: Walshak: Aguila: Matson: Morton: Mayor: bring it with staff's input to you so that you have a full understanding of it. Another mediation? I'd like to avoid going to mediation. If you're comfortable with that Lynne, I'd be happy to go back but that opens up old wounds and I think we should ~e beyond that by now. And we've all grown up enough so that we can try to resolve these issues in the forum that we have rather than have to bring it back to the Judge. The Judge wasn't that (sounds like) kind last time. I think that we should try to resolve as many as we can. All right. Let's see what we can do. And those we canlt, well... ...we'll go back to mediation. I don't think therels anything there that we can't resolve. I didn't hear anything there that was earth shaking. ... put that road by my house... um...hum... Hey, I want to go back to 1988 when we suggested as a Planning & Zoning Board, and I think you were on as an alternate then.... No, I was in school... I was in school. I'm sure I wasn't there. I do have... ...that that road be narrowed down to two lanes through there to avoid a speed track. Oh yeah. And it is one now. Imagine if you put a third lane there. I do have one suggestion. lid like something in writing either from us to you or from you to us stating that these are the issues. I don't want this to be like "son of issue" and "son of son of issue.11 You know, there has to be a stopping point somewhere, Michael. I think this is a good time.... It will never stop as long as the City Commission is in a mood to grant favors or grant wishes. We will resolve what we can resolve and those we cannot resolve, as far as this Mayor is concerned, will go back to Court and let the Judge resolve. -10- Verbatim Transcript from 11/2/93 City Commission Meeting Morton: Mayor: Morton: Mayo r : Morton: Walshak: Mayo r : Morton: Matson: Morton: Matson: Mayor: Matson: Mayor: Aguila: Matson: Mayo r: Aguila: Mayor: Matson: Mayo r: Miller: Well, there were three Mayors before you Mr. Harmening that had that same attitude. I think the issue really is to try to do these things amicably... ... 11m (sounds like) with you.... ... forum... and not take the attitude that we need to go back to Court to g~t them resolved. ... no.... Itls really not a wish list. Itls a... Thatls his opinion, Mike. One person. live already said 11m in favor of resolving all that can be resolved. Okay. Good. Let's get together on what the issues are. Okay, because I'm not inflamatory. 11m in a very nice, calm, easy mood these days. Thank you very much. Weill get together and agree on the issues. To get this off the agenda, let's have a motion... motion to table.... . . . to table it. Well, we donlt want to table this issue. We want to get rid of this issue all together and come back and do the 16 point list. Move to delete this from the agenda. I think that's better. All right. Second. Itls been moved and seconded to delete this from the agenda. ...delete something that we just discussed.... And to instruct the City Attorney and the City Manager and Planning staff to meet with Michael Morton and attempt to resolve, as much as possible, these issues. I'm also going to ask the City Clerk for a verbatim on these issues, as stated. -11- Verbatim Transcript from 11/2/93 City Commission Meeting Mayor: Matson: Miller: Matson: Mayor: Well, if we research.... That needs to be a sub-motion because we have to vote on verbatims. Do it. Okay. So let's take care of this motion and then 1111 make another motion about verbatim. Voices: Aye. All right. All right. All in favor of this motion, say aye. Mayor: Matson: Voice: Mayor: Voice: Mayor: Voices: Mayo r : Miller: Mayor: Matson: Mill er: Mayo r : Opposed? (silence) So carried. I'd like to make a motion that this discussion that we just had on this item that's not on the agenda... a verbatim transcript. Second. All right. A motion's been made and seconded to try and get as much verbatim as possible... love that in the Clerkls office... Okay. Any discussion on the motion? Okay. All in favor? Aye. Opposed? (silence)_ So carried. You know I really think that's the only way, between that and plans, that we can tie down what the intents were during that period of time. And 11m not sure some of the minutes will... Well, weill search. Well, we still have the tapes. It's got to be here, if there was a motion passed. The minutes have to reflect it. You're right. (Discussion changes to a different topic) Yeah. I think so. All right..... J .~ . l" -. , r:.'-+-+ ,.. f., ,": I : J" .~ ...._/./ ~ . ,,",.1_"_ Shannon Burkett Deputy City Clerk (Transcribed from Tape 2 of 11/2/93 Meeting) -12- ~, f-y-r PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-250 TO: FROM: ~~tt Miller, City Manager ~~ Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director DATE: September 27, 1993 RE: Tradewinds This is a response to your memorandum on Tradewinds aSking me to review the stipulated settlements for items that have not been completed. S W 8th st has not been completed with a turnaround and questions surrounding the industrial access road and railroad crossing have never been settled. As far as I know, all other conditions within the settlement agreement have been met. This review did not include any review of conditions on plats, site plans or master plans. I hope this memorandum is of some help to you. If you should have any questions, please feel free to call me. CC : f rb A:93-250 r<ECEIVED St:.t" 2 7 1993 CITYMANAGEA'S OfF;,: " PLANNING AND ZONL.G DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-317 FROM: J. Scott Miller Ci ty Manager r-- . 6 _/~ . Tambri J. Heyden ~ ~ Acting Planning and Zoning ~ecto TO: DATE: December 13, 1993 SUBJECT: Revised response to Mr. Morton's revised list of items woolbright Place PUD and Shoppes of Woolbright PCD As requested by your Memorandum No. 93-398, which was initiated due to your receipt of Michael Morton's submittal of a written synopsis of the issues he presented at the November 2, 1993 city commission meeting, I have revised my previous response (Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 93-306) as follows: 1. Vestina Issue My previous response (provided under response #1) still stands. Our department has been charging current fees for development applications submitted by Tradewinds. In my opinion the city Attorney needs to advise. 2. Environmental Issue My previous response (provided under response #2) still stands. 3. S.W. 8th street My previous response (provided under response #6) still stands. For your information, I met with a gentleman approximately two weeks ago who was interested in developing the multi-family portion of the PUD. He told me that no developer, especially one who builds affordable housing, would be able to build all the units allowed within the PUD because of the traffic situation. Therefore, I would think allowing just a two lane right-of-way would make developing the PUD even more difficult. 4. Industrial Access Road My previous response (provided under response #8) is heretofore revised. Mr. Morton's synopsis included a sketch which I did not receive, however he provides information of which I was not aware. In researching our files on this topic, there is a substantial amount of correspondence. If the access road is moved farther south, the anticipated connections to Mr. Winchester's property will not meet the subdivision regulations (if copies of this correspondence are needed, please let me know). In addition, as discussed in my previous response (#4 regarding filing master plan modifications), I would strongly recommend that necessary master plan modifications not be delayed to the time of submitting site plans for the reasons discussed in this previous response. 5. Uses in the pcn My previous response (provided under response #9) still stands. TO: J. Scott Miller -2- December 13, 1993 6. sianaae on 1-95 My previous response (provided under response #10) is heretofore revised. In researching again the sign code that was in effect in 1986, a second (additional) freestanding sign would be allowed. If relief from the 1986 sign code is desired, the proper mechanism is a Board of Adjustment variance. This is not a city commission duty. 7. Master Plan Modifications My previous response (provided under response #4) still stands. 8. Landscape Buffer vs. Wall My previous response (provided under response #5) still stands. 9. Reservation of Sewer and Water Capacity My previous response (provided under response #3) still stands. 10. Expedited Processina My previous response (provided under response #7) still stands. However, I would like to add that staff believes there is clarification needed for processing amended plans. 11. Acreaae on Bovnton Beach Boulevard My previous response (provided under response #11) still stands. However, I would like to add that the process Mr. Morton refers to would be a rezoning and possible a land use amendment, depending on the use desired. No such application has been filed with our office. tjh A:MortnLst2 (Tradewin) xc: Michael Haag Michael Rumpf MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 93 - 515 PROM: John A. Guidry, Utilities Director TO: J. Scott Miller, City Manager DATE: December 13, 1993 SUBJECT: Tradewinds - Response to your memo no. 93 - 398 Following is our response to Mr. Morton's synopsis regarding only utilities issues. Item numbers correlate to those items in his memo of November 30, 1993: 1) Vesting Issue - Based upon the Oct. 30, 1989 Stipulation and Settlement, and section 19-89(b)(1) of the City's Code, the initial 650 equivalent residential connections (ERC's) for this development do not require concurrency approval or reservation fees for water and sewer utilities. In addition, it also appears that the Capital Facilities Charges in effect in 1986 are the ones to be applied to these 650 ERC's. 4) Industrial Access Road - We take exception to the proposed abandonment of the Industrial Access Road right-of-way, and the rei ocating of a bui lding over it, for this route was intended to contain a gravity sewer line that would serve all parcels west of S.W. 8th Street. We must see the intended routing of a re-designed sewer main before we could agree to a master plan modification on this issue. A letter of credit, or other acceptable surety is still required for the sewer improvements in the Industrial Access Road corrider. 9) Reservation of Water and Sewer Capacity - Our comments in item 1) above relate also to this issue. Up to 650 ERC's of water and sewer capacity will be reserved or committed for the entire project. Note that Home Depot has already used a portion of this capacity. We al so have an addi tional comment regarding the Acme PI astics site. namely that this office never received an acceptable form of surety for the off-site gravity sewer which would allow this site to connect to our sewer system. The del ay on the part of the developer in furnishing this surety was one of the factors preventing issuance of a building permit. It should be noted for the record that this Department modified its original conditions for approving this site plan, at the developer's request, to allow for the furnishing of surety rather than requiring actual construction of the off-si te line as a prere building permit. DEe I 4 1993 J. Scott December Hemo no. Page 2 Hiller 13, 1993 93-515 , . I trust the above discussion fully addresses Mr. Morton's comments regarding utilities issues. Please direct any further questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella of this office. JAG!PVH bc: Peter Mazzella xc: Jim Cherof Tambri Hevden Jim White Don Jaeger Kevin Hallahan File ",f- ,_~_..." ;..,~:.-,'..-. . . . .~ .~.... '..;.;......f..,'.. _.. 12/02/93 09:39 "401 241 0846 MORTON GROUP iI 002 .. , . MEMO TO: ~ENORiNDUIS City Of Boynton Beach City Commissioners City Hlnag~r Michae 1 Morton Nov. 30. 1993 . MEMO FROII: DATE: RE: WOOlBRIGHT PLACE V~NTURE PUBLIC HEARING DEVELOPMENT ISSUES Thank you ~or allowing me the opport~nlty 1:0 address the Comm"1ssior. 1'uesaay, NO\lembe1" ,ld, l"egarding issues relative to clar11'1cat1o.n of tne 5ettlement .~ccords rE cned in 1990. As I stated; tne property owner~ are concerned that the Ci'ty : .off take a posit'ive patn when presenttd \1ith planning, en91neering -3.nd const ..lction matters and expec11t1cusly process same as =greea in our ~arious 51 pulations. .~s the CC :m1ss1on has been maCle aware, Jim Cherof and our attorney, John geranek ha e been before Judge Edward Garrison who maintains jurisdiction over the settl, ~nt agreement and its fmplementation and as per his directive, ~e have gone ;0 mediation on two occasions before Judge Silverman. Lynn Matson ,)!'t beha If of the Comissiofl, Chris. Cutro, our respective attorneys. Howard Schar 1 in c.ct myse If attended same and it was agreed that the i $Sues 'nere a 11 ~esolvatle several have been, several remain, some new 1is~es have aros&. iherefore the C it)' j that are commission n the spirit or our ongoing good faith and conciliatory ~ffo~ts. ld th~s developer should rl!sa1\1& the questions and interpl"etat.ions :urrently outstanding. I tr~8d to present a synopsis to the and as agreed, I am following through with this memor~nourn. 12/02/93 09:39 tt40''-- , 0646 MORTON GROUP !4I003 r 'OIl:1:. ~ , . November :! l , 1993 Pa'1e Two 1. VEST1 !!G ISSUE - AFFIRMATION G.c~Q." ? The ~ U.O. and P.C.D. whi~h com rise thf rojec~ WA~ vested by agree~nt to Nc.ember 1986 an 1"'atifieti b the Count Thu wlndow of t11'11e apP!leS to b t not 1 imited to all issues of t. is project inclucUng p1annmg, zonir 'f subdivision ol"dinances, uti lity fees I permit fees, city an:! cOt.:n1'" impact fees, ete. the premise is had ~e been al10wed to build this prcjE .t in 19S6 a.s WQ should nave. those were the fees in effect. .We shc-u' .. not be subject to new fee, or fee increases that became elfectlVe SUbSE uently November 1986. Z. ENV Iii' :NMENTAL. ISSUES - AFFIRMATION The ( ty, county and Florida FiSh and Game all agreed upon the ves~Tng statu of this project in 198E. Florida Fish & Game signed off on the prope ty and the City was to issue c.learing, grubbing, grading and ex~av,tion permit3 for both the P.U.O. and P.C.D. After ~$olving gopher torto se and scrub jay concerns by relocation 01 the gopher tortoises, .e prOC8 dad to construct tl'le Home Depot faci lity. c i eared ~ort ions of the site or uti Hty fnsta l1a.tion, g~ading and drainage, and axca....ated the l.kearcel to about 75% of completion. The City has agreed that we do not j 'lYe enviromtJentaT issues and we can continue forward with tne p!"epl1~t.ion and s1te development for the project. It would be helpfUl if the c ty staff c1'fd not consult with or usist the local environmenta1 group which attempt to tamper with the igrQements in place. 3. MODIF :ATION OF S.~. 8TH STREET CONSTRUCTION Preset :ly S.W. 8th Street is to be constructed (4) lanes :.:p to the end or en. P. C.O., transition to (3) JUles to the end ,or the P.U .0. The right of way Ofv!n for the road is 'for four (4) lanes. HOWEver the likel. lOed of constructing (4) lanes through Lake Boynton Estatas to 8oYrJtc' Beach 80uievard would require extensive acquisition of riqnt of way. i ierefore. at this time it 'NOU ld be safer to transition down from 4 lanes :0 2 la.nes t:hrough the P.U.O. to Ocean Avenue. If at any time in the f~ ure the county or city w~nts to ~ lane to Boynton Bea,h Blvd.. aur 4 lane R.O.w. will of course be in place. . 12/0%/93 09: 40 tt407 241 0848 MORTON GROUP iii 004 ...'10~ !I'2l:= , . November 30 19S3 Page Three 4. INOUS1 IAl ACCESS ROAD This, tad is an 80.01 R.O.rI. between the P.C.O. and P.U.O. r-unning Eut from .N. 8th Street to the CSX rai1r-oad tracks along I-gS. We have asked :he court to ab&ndon this r-cad as it sar~es no purpose, the O.O.T. and rc lroad have firmly indicated they will not grant a crossing at this 1oeit' -n. Documents supporting this Ilave been submitted to the courts. Wena a not aggressively pursued the matter so ~5 not tc affect tile W;nchE ;ter property ea!t of the ~a;ll"04d by eliminc.ting -:t:is access complt ;ely. We n.4ve worked ",ith Ms. Matson and Chris Citro at mediat10n to am cab le ~e$O lve thfs issue. The cOImlission needs :c rat1fy our modif. :ation to th~ P.C.D. Master P11n to reflect same. Basicallv as per the a1 :ached 3ketcn. we 4r"e incorporating the access road ana the- service road~h;nd the shopping center into one road. Flaving th1s area with road :lY ; ng of the upn~ 1t type that would be usea for the road had it. / ..J- been onstr-ucud. This gives us the ab1l1ty to move the building h/~.' ~ ['5true~ lie to the north property 1ine, m!1m:atns a.ccess should Winchester ever :::hieve the rail cross1ng antt el1m1nates what is now a I;no mans ~yt:ty: L j, 80.0' :orridor of paved road which probably will never be used except for ( , 1"7 ~ ; llegj' dump1ng, car rac1ng, teena~ers hanc out or whatever. A new I~~~L_ J- mastel p1an retlect1nq tnis change wl11 be 5uDmitted when we finalize our ""4 s1te ! Ian with the retai 1 use or user for this parcel. The concept needs lIr<..c.enc".?,,4; to Oe approved now as to allow the sfte plan to be developed with this f /l' , c.hangl 1nCOfP<l'rated. ',lie would be e1 iminatinq the letter of credit in ~V~ "....c:..z.T~ place ~or this road. ./ eIc. _ ~ .. -. USES ~ THE P.C.D. DISTRICT In l~ 5 what is referred to as the 'first 'stttlilll&nt agreemen't, was negot ited and executed by all partiQS. That agreement ~dS the product of a. )fotracted nQget;4t~on ....hich produced a !;gnifieaflt reciuction of dens;' I. int~ns;ty and uses and compromises for the P .U.O. and I).C.O. Howev. ' as the politics then dictateo, tAe city unfortunately reneged on that ~reement with a new .ett iQl11Qnt agreement negotiated in 1989 and exeCtr !d in 199O. The 1990 agreement restored c:t'lcf1ges to the density, land l,liQS, squarQ footage, etc. and refers to the 1986 settlement stric' ly as a point of beginning. It wes the basi! for which the lawsuit that l'lS implemented, and the 1990 agreClTent completely restructured the inten' ion Qf the partie:! when executed fn 1990. . One element in t~e 1986 agreer mt changed by the 1990 agreement, which has De@n questfoned the u!e 0 our out. pal"'cels foT" fast foed fac1l1ti~s such as Kenny Rogers, MacOol 11d$, Burger- King, auto rell!.Led uses, etc. We i"ie~a staff to be !W~~e :hat these are allowable uses as our unGer~ying comprenensi~e land ~~e p \n and the approval for this pr~ject is a F.C.D./C-3 desig~a!ion. ) . . November 30 1993 P!ge Four ~. SrGNAG. ON I-95 At med ation an accord was reached to ailow a sign facing I.95 for this P.C.!). project on land acquired either from Elsie &. Bill r~inchester or the CS railroad. we had negotiated for the purchase of a portion of tr~ Wlnche ter property and from CSX which wol.lld give us continuity,. of proper y and ownership to our P.C.D. and erect signage to identify the projec and its major tenants. At this time. we would like to proceed with t at project with the commissions approval. j. MAST:RJl..AN MODIFICATIONS P .C.D./P.U.D. We arE master submit the 5 appro... ;:llan i P 1 asH We are time g It was each t Acme, losing e~tena suggesting that rather having 'to s1.lbmit a /llodificuion of the plan each time we site plan a portien of the property that we the mcdification wtlen that section is complete. FlJr e}l;ample on c.r-Q portion of oUr P.C.D. west or SW 8th Street, ha'dng received 1 fo~ the 1 acre service station site, we prov'ded a new master ccrporating same. When we received approval for the 1.4 acre Acme site, we were .sked to again provide a mcster plan modification. not Objecting to showing these projects on a new plan bUL to tne d expense of processing each time which causes addftional delays. apparent to Chris CutiO that this would delay our approval process me, agreeing it should not have to be done. As fn the case with ;he delays have ended up with both the developer and the City this ~axpayer as they dec1dea not to build is completion time d too late 1ntQ the season. 8. LANOSe PE BUFFER US WALL Along he West property l;n~ of the S acre P.C.D., a great deal of time and e) ense was put into designing a suitable landscaping buffer rather tl'lat a 6'0" nrall. Pla.ns were sutmlittea and approved ana the !:linn a.long with . mdscaping material was jnstailed in 199Q. It was agreed that ther~ nly be a wail between the 15 acre P.C.D. p.rcel at the North side and S( !th end of the 48 acre P.U.D. A.ll ti'lh was done with council appr~v 1 at public hear1ngs. 9. RESERV rIOH OF SrwcR & WATER CAPACITY Affinm tion by council and letter from City Utilities Dept. that capacity will b reserved and avai1a.b1e for th~s project unti1 it is ccmp.ietec1. t S" I.. c..7"~- ~ ~c.l"U_~ ....( J~/~ ! ;<:; tb tvv..../A Vj'4-. ('-f "'f ~f,oJt-. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANOLM NO. 93-306 FROM: J. Scott Miller city Manager /) ~l / Tambri J. Heyden ~.L"}Ll~"'~L- . Q. i</-c,i~(2n__ Acting Planning and Zoning Di1fector~~' TO: DATE: November 23, 1993 SUBJECT: Michael Morton's list of items - Woolbright Place PUD and Shoppes of Woolbright PCD After reading the verbatim transcript you provided regardinq the list of issues itemized by Michael Morton at the November 2, 1993 City Commission meetinq, these issues can be summarized as follows (the affected departments are included, as well as the Planning and Zoninq Department's understandinq of the issue): 1. Vestinq of the PCD and PUD relative to land use. planninq. zoninq. Ci tv ordinances and permit fees (all departments represented on the TRC with emphasis on Planning and Zoning, Building, Engineering and Utilities) This issue is addressed in stipulation 16, 20 c, 20 d, and 22 of the January 24, 1990 Stipulation and Settlement Agreement between Tradewinds Development Corporation and the City. Based on the referenced stipulations, of which I believe Jim Cherof has now provided all TRC members a copy, staff has been reviewing all development applications submitted by Tradewinds against the codes and ordinances, including the zoning code and the 1986 Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report, in effect on November 1986. Incidentally, this is how the gas station was allowed; it would not have been permitted under current regulations. I believe Mr. Morton's concern is really permit fees and impact fees, administered by the Building Department. Stipulation 22 of the 1990 agreement and condition D.2 of the 1986 Stipulation and Settlement Agre~ment address this issue; the two agreements are to be read in tandem. Based on the language from the two agreements, it is my understandinq that only those fees required in 1986 would apply to Tradewinds, not that the cost of the fees would be in 1986 dollars. Also, the 1986 agreement states that Tradewinds acknowledges that the city cannot bind Palm Beach County as to its Fair Share Traffic Impact Fee Ordinance and that Tradewinds shall be subject to the County's implementation of that ordinance. The City Attorney may need to advise. 2. Protected species and their habitat as it relates to pullinq permits (City Forester, Building and Engineering) Although the Planning and Zoning Department is not directly involved with this issue, I offer my understanding of the issue which is that although Tradewinds is exempt from the City's comprehensive plan policies reqarding preservation of flora and fauna, they are not exempt from the state and federal governments' requlations regarding protected species and their babitat, such as the gopher tortoise habitat and the scrub jay. Therefore, I would expect that the City does have a role in assisting with compliance of these regulations, prior to issuing permits. 3. Reservatiol, of sewer and water capacitv (Planning and Zoning and Utilities) By virtue of stipulation 20 d, which references Comprehensive Plan Policy 90.5.2 and stipulation 24 of the 1990 Stipulation and settlement Aqreement, the referenced pu~ and PCD are vested for, among other things already discussed above, the provision of public facilities. . I do not know whether the Utilities Department TO: J. Scott Miller -2- November 23, 1993 considers the payment of reservation fees applicable to Tradewinds, in light of the effective date of the ordinance requiring reservation fees. 4. Filinq master plan modifications (Planning and Zoning primarily, however Engineering and utilities are impacted) The letter Mr. Morton references in the verbatim transcript is the October 22, 1993 agreement prepared by Jim Cherof. Mr. Morton signed the letter, which was geared toward the Acme Plastics project, agreeing that he would file a master plan modification and the city must approve it, prior to submittal of any new project within the PCD. In addition, at the August 10, 1993 Planning and Zoning Board meeting when the Acme site plan was considered, Mr. Morton agreed he would file a master plan modification before any more plans were submitted for review. The city Commission at their August 17, 1993 meeting approved all Acme staff comments, including a condition that Mr. Morton discuss impact fees with Jim Cherof. Despite that Acme has abandoned their plans for the PCD site, I would strongly urge that the City Commission require filing a master plan modification prior to submittal of any development plan that is inconsistent with the approved PCD master plan, for the following reasons: a) the suggested timing of filing a master plan modification is what is required of other applicants, however under the procedure set forth under Resolution No. 92-99, an expedited process is available to Tradewinds, b) in light of recent information discovered by staff that when the PCD was platted, an approximate 1.4 acre tract, zoned PCD was excluded and included within the PUD plat, and c) to ensure the City'S ability to enforce the provisions of the stipulation and settlement agreements related to such things as uses, curb cuts and infrastructure and to protect the City'S interest in promoting the intent and purpose of planned commercial developments which are defined as: 1. land under unified control, planned and developed as a whole in a single development operation or a programmed series of development operations for commercial buildings and related uses and facilitiesj 2. provides for a commercial district of efficient and harmonious design so arranged as to create an attractive project readily integrated with and having no adverse effect on adjoining or surrounding areas and developmentsj 3. is developed according to comprehensive and detailed plans for streets, utilities, lots, building sites, etc., and site plans, floor plans and elevations for all buildings intended to be located, constructed, used and related to one another, and detailed plans for other uses and improver\ents on the land related to the buildingsj and 4. includes a program for full provision, maintenance, and operation of such areas, improvements, facilities and services for coromion use by the occupants of the PCD. 5. Landscape buffer versus six foot wall on PCD property line (planning and Zoning) To: J. Scott Miller -3- November 23, 1993 I have found the 1986 drawings Mr. Morton referred to regarding a landscaped berm. In fact I have assembled all the PUD and PCD plans ever submitted by Tradewinds for the Woolbright site and have organized them chronologically. However, the detailed berm plans were prepared for, and apply to, only the PUD. This makes sense because by code, no buffer, berm or wall between the adj acent Leisureville development and the PUD is required. Therefore, the 50 feet wide landscaped berm and buffer shown on the PUD plans was proposed by Tradewinds to appease the Leisureville residents. As referenced in the 1986 staff report prepared by the Planning Department and as shown on the 1986 PCD plans, the peripheral greenbel t required by code where the PCD abuts residential and where it abuts non-residential districts is shown with no details for berming or buffering. Therefore, I believe that a wall and a greenbelt were anticipated for the north and west PCD boundaries, as is existing in other PCDs. 6. S.W. 8th Street - a four lane road transitioninq to a two lane road (Plamdng and Zoning and Engineering) Based on the width of the S.W. 8th Street right-of-way as platted wi thin the PCD and the PUD, Mr. Morton's statements appear to correlate with the intent of the platted right-of-way width. However, I am curious as to what roadway improvements were bonded with the PUD plat; an Engineering Department matter. Traffic was a major topic of discussion during the special city Commission meetings held to finalize the enhancements. I can find correspondence from Tim Cannon, the Acting Planning and Zoning Director, when the meetings took place in November and December of 1989 and January 1990, however the department's recommendations were not approved by City Commission. Furthermore, I am missing the exhibits referenced in stipulation 15 and 16 of the 1990 Stipulation and Settlement Agreement. I presume that the methodology used in the approved traffic study which addressed the enhancements factored in various off-site road improvements. Therefore, a change in the required road improvements would impact the traffic distribution assumptions made and would necessitate a new study. 7. Expedited processinq (Planning and Zoning and City Attorney) Resolution No. 92-99 sets forth a procedure for expedited processing. Former Planning and Zoning Director, chris Cutro, worked with the City Attorney in drafting the procedure. However, Chris had informed our department that certain details he and Jim Cherof had discussed were left out of the resolution leaving uncertainty with respect to several points. Chris left no notes regarding the meetings he and Jim Cherof had with Michael Morton, therefore the City Attorney may need to advise. However, since staff has had some difficulty enforcing the resolution, I concur with Mr. Morton that the meaning of "expediting" is still not as clear as it should be. 8. Industrial access road as part of PCD (Planning and Zoning and City Attorney) Stipulation 18 of the 1990 Stipulation and Settlement Agreement states that the city agrees that Tradewinds may access the PCD from the industrial collector road (now platted as Morton's Way). I know that the industrial access road has been discussed at great length during mediations and during meetings between Chris Cutro, Michael Morton and Jim Cherof, but do not know what transpired. I am not clear what Mr. Morton means by incorporating the road within the PUD, unless he wishes to rezone and replat the road as part of the PCD. The physical location of the road is virtually locked in place due to the obligation to serve the M-1 property to the east. Therefore, I see no benefit in either case, since the City is bound TO: J. Scott Miller -4- November 23, 1993 to allowing access to the PCD from the road. More clarification from Mr. Morton may be needed. 9. 1986 Stipulation and Settlement Aareement and 1990 Stipulation and Settlement Aareement (City Attorney) Staff has been operating, under the guidance from the City Attorney, that the two agreements do not stand on their own and must be read in tandem. If Tradewinds wishes to modify the prohibition of fast food establishments (it seems this is the only issue Mr. Morton is concerned with in the 1986 agreement) then at minimum, the approved master plan should be modified. The city Attorney needs to advise regarding the mechanism to change the agreement, if necessary. 10. PYlon sian alona 1-95 (Planning and Zoning, city Attorney and Building) I was not aware that this had also been discussed at mediation, therefore I do not know what Mr. Morton had proposed relative to size, wording and height of the pylon. However, at a minimum, the approved Shoppes of Woolbright PCD sign package would need amending. In addition, variances by the Board of Adjustment may be necessary. sign variances are regulated by Section 21-16 of the Code of Ordinances (page 1492). Only variances to setback, area, height and number of signs can be applied for and granted. Mr. Morton is asking for a sign on the side of the PCD which has no street frontage; there is another piece of property between 1-95 and the PCD. street frontage is a requirement for additional freestanding signs. As a point of information, the Quantum Park signs referenced by Mr. Morton were approved by variance under a different sign code. In addition, Quantum does have frontage on 1-95. 11. Tradewinds acreaae on Bovnton Beach Boulevard (Planning and Zoning, Recreation and Parks and city Attorney) The two acres referenced by Mr. Morton were the subj ect of a November 1991 land use element amendment, rezoning and text amendment which was denied by the City Commission. Similar applications were filed in August 1990 which Tradewinds withdrew prior to city Commission public hearings. I was not aware that this acreage was discussed at mediation and am also not aware that the city won I t be building a park on the 3 1/2 acres acquired through dedication under the subdivision regulations for parks and recreation purposes. Pursuant to the October 17, 1990 parks and recreation agreement between the City ld Tradewinds, since the City has failed to generate park development plans within three years of the agreement, Tradewinds must now pay $60,000 in lieu of the already occurred land dedication. Therefore, the agreement should be extended or the fee paid. Since, construction of the PUD, a residential development that will be served by the future park, has not begun, it is recommended that the agreement be extended. 12. Letters of credit (Engineering, utilities and Building) No comment 13. Future uses within the PCD and PUD (Planning and Zoning) Subject to any use limitations specified in the stipulation and settlement agreements, Section 6.F.5 of the Zoning Code governs PCD permitted uses, conditional uses and uses requiring environmental review. Since this section allows all uses in a PCD that are allowed in C-3 zoning district, for uses not clearly allowed, and not expressly prohibited in Section 6.C.1 of the Zoning Code, the use approval process can be initiated by Tradewinds. This is a TO: J. Scott Miller -5- November 23, 1993 short process that enables a use determination without the expense and effort involved in submitting a site plan. If this process had been initiated, the Acme site plan request would have gone a little more smoothly. Uses within the PUD are governed by Appendix B, Section 7 of the Zoning Code. In conclusion, I want to thank you for permitting me additional time to prepare this report. Due to the history of this project and the compleJ.i ty of some of the issues, the extra time was necessary to thoroughly conduct the research. tjh A:MortonLst (Tradewin) xc: Michael Haag Michael Rumpf ~~ .f.jl\, 1~ April 24, 1992 Tradewinds Group City of Boynton Beach Mr. Chris cutro City Planner 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Re: Woolbright Place PUD Blowing Sand Congress Corporate Plaza 902 Clint Moore Road Suite 124 Boca Raton, FL 33487 (407) 994-3133 Dear Mr. Cutro: Based on recent telephone conversations with Engineer- ing and Planning and Code Enforcement regarding blowing sand conditions at our Woolbright site, the following steps have been taken and the following continuous maintenance will occur. We will cause our contractor or contractors to con- tinually water down the haul roadways presently being used during the excavation process. We will keep the stockpiles of fill material in a manageable configura- tion so as to minimize any blowing sand conditions and water said stockpiles as necessary as a further precau- tion. If it becomes necessary, we will cause to have erected a wooden snow fence along the west boundary line. On the residential portion of the property, we will take the same steps as above so as to keep the condi- tion at its minimal. It is expected that we commence our clearing, grubbing, and excavation process on the PUD site within the next 90-120 days, and, if for any reason, work were to be curtailed or phased and same became a problem, we would seed and hay that portion of the property as well. As you are aware, we have had a bond in place to cover any blowing sand conditions and will continue said bond in place that covers the entirety of the Woolbright project PUD and peDe RECEIVED APR 24 PLANNING DEPT. As you are aware, in the past two weeks there were some unusually windy days which caused blowing sand conditions. Up until that time, we had not been aware of any com laints since the last time a similar condition existed. We appreciate your help in these Sincz:erely, Michael Morton MMjdob CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE CITY OF BOYNTON BBACH ~ ~ Ivr--- X~~/d ~ r Chris Cutro/Vincent Finizio DATE 9/30/91 TO: DEPARTMENT Planning/Engineering APPROPRIATE ACTION [J EVALUATION/RECOMMENDATION [J FOR YOUR FILES [J r ACTION DESIRED PRIOR TO ~ [J o FOR YOUR INFORMATION NOTE AND RETURN OTHER SUBJECT: Gopher Tortoises - Woolbright Place Development Attached hereto please find a copy of a letter dated September 23, 1991, from Don A. Wood, Endangered Species Coordinator, Florida Game & Fresh Water Fish Commission, directed to Mr. Kevin Hallahan, Boynton Beach Forester/Environmentalist, bringing Kevin up to date on the gopher tortoise relocation permits that have been issued in association with the Woolbright Place development, both PCD and PUD sites. I draw your attention to the fourth paragraph whereby the State has asked Tradewinds not to disturb the PUD site until such time as the relocation of the gopher tortoises have been fully accomplished. Mr. David Levy, representing Tradewinds, gave verbal assurance to the State's request. No site development work whatsoever shall be undertaken by the Tradewinds Group on the PUD site until the relocation of the tortoises have been appropriately handled. No formal action is needed at this time. This letter from the Florida Game & Fresh Water Fish Commission is being for- warded to you for informational purposes only. No response is necessary. ,~.., R13.C13.lVED City Manager JSM:cd cc: Honorable Mayor and City Commission Stella Rossi Central File Attachment c;~~ 30 p\>.Ni'\\NG OE-Pl. ~ RESPONSE: r t~ )".,. r~ e tdt ~~ RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM *91-301 TO: Scott Miller, City Manager K~H FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Charles C. Frederick, Director ~~~j? Recreation & Park Department ~ VIA: SUBJECT: Gopher Tortoises - Woolbright Place Apartments DATE: July 25, 1991 This memorandum is subsequent to the meeting on July 18th involving myself, Charles Frederick, Chris Cutro, Stella Rossi (Wilderness Island Coalition), Rosa Dorando (Audubon Society), Joanne Davis (Native Plant Society), and Gary Lenhertz. The direction from discussion at the meeting was to ascertain whether the developer of Woolbright Place Apartments had a permit to provide suitable habitat for the existing gopher tortoise population. I met with and discussed the issue with Mark Robson from the Florida Fish & Game Commission. We met on the site on July 23rd in the company of two additional wildlife enforcement officers in order for his agency to respond to the copy of letters sent to your office from Stella Rossi and Rosa Durando. The automobiles all parked at the SW 8th Street dead-end near Home Depot, attracted a response from Channel 12 TV news who interviewed Mr. Robson and myself. A short except was shown on the 5:30 PM news Tuesday, July 23rd. We did find seven (7) active burrows and one (1) inactive burrow on the site, suggesting that a permit would be required for protecting the gopher tortoises. Mr. Robson subsequently checked his file which indicates that the developer has two (2) gopher tortoise permits on file which have been extended three times and expires in January 1992. There were nine (9) individuals from the Home Depot site and three (3) individuals from the conunercial site all relocated to a donor site in Deerfield Beach. The current permits allow the developer to continue the relocation efforts, although the permit for the apartment site stipulates preserving twenty-five (25) individuals on the site. The site is to have a "preserve area" for the gopher tortoises to be relocated to, upon completion of the permit. This situation could change based upon direction given by the Fish & Game commission. Mr. Robson is reviewing the current permits for the site with his supervisor, Mr. Don Woods (Tallahassee) and will be sending us a letter indicating the status of the gopher tortoise permit. . RECEIVED 'ul ~ti .. PLANNING DEPT. \ I ~ ....... The intent of this permit is to prohibit any mechanical equipment on the site prior to effective protection of the gopher tortoises. This would have a direct impact on use of the site for a construction trailer in conjunction with excavating the site lake for the NW 22nd Avenue interchange. I would suggest waiting for the written update from the Florida Fish & Game Commission before proceeding with any construction permits from the Building or Engineering Departments. KH: ad CC: John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Mike Haag, Zoning & Site Development Administrator Vince Finizio, Administrative Coordinator of Engineering CITY MANAGBR' S OPPICB CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH ~~ ~ - TO: Kevin Hallahan via: Charles Frederick DATE 7/5/91 Recreation & Parks DEPARTMENT APPROPRIATE ACTION ~ EVALUATION/RECOMMENDATION [] FOR YOUR FILES [] ACTION DESIRED PRIOR TO o o o FOR YOUR INFORMATION NOTE AND RETURN OTHER SUBJECT: Woo~bright Place - Gopher Tortoise Attached hereto please find a copy of a letter dated July 2, 1991, from Stella Rossi, Coalition for Wilderness Islands, requesting a survey of the Woolbright place property to be undertaken by Kevin Hallahan for the purpose' of determining the number of tortoise burrows existing on the site before they are destroyed through construction activities. Ms. Rossi's letter for action on the part of the City was generated by a letter dated June 30, 1991, from the Audubon Society of the Everglades informing her organization that several local residents have witnessed several gopher tortoise migrating and feeding on this specific site. As soon as possible I would ask that you please meet with this office, along with Charles Frederick, Chris cutro, Stella Rossi (if available), and myself in order to develop a work program that can be acted on expedi- tiously. . Your prompt attention is appreciated. Thank you. 0co~,-;;-ty Manager JSM:cd cc: Honorable Mayor and City Commission Carrie Parker, Assistant City Manager Wilfred Hawkins, Assistant to the City Manager Chris cutro, Director of Planning Joyce Costello, Administrative Assistant Central File Attachment RECEIVED JUL 5 PLANNING DEPT. 4 ....", .;'" Date (Action Completed) Signature ,., \. "..::....} ---, . "These are islands in time - with nothing to date them on the calendar of mankind. In these areas it is as if a person were looking backward into the ag~s and foreward untold years. Here are bits of eternity, which have a precIousness beyond aI/accounting. .. Harvey Broome, 1948 j Stell. RoMInes ReI 625 Whlsoertll9 ~ 33435 Boynton Beech. July 2, 1991 Pine Flat Woods C. Scott Miller Ci ty Manager City of Boynton Beach P.O. Bo x: 310 Boynton Beach, Fla. 33425 Dear Mr. Miller Please find enclosed a copy of correspondence addressed to the Florida Game and Fresh Water F1ish' Commission alerting them to the presence of Gopher Tortoise on the Woolbright Place PUD. We expect a survey of this property will be undertaken by Kevin Hallahan, City Forrester, to determine the number of tor~oise burrows existing on site before anyone would have a chance to destroy this protected species. A representative of the Audubon Society of the Everglades and of the Coalition for Wilderness Islands, would like to accompany Mr. Hallahan on his inspection of this scrub site. We also request a,coPY of his report. Sincerely, Jd--~ c Stella Rossi Coalition for Wilderness Islands 407- 732-4786 RECEIVED COALITION FOR WILDERNESS ISLANDS 129 N.W. 12th AVE. Boca Raton, Florida 33432 JUL S 1991 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE . l - ....,..,. J , -).. &J!JJ@(1lJ[ill(Q)~ ~(Q)~n~lr)f (Q)W If[Xl~ ~W~~@[L&@~~ P. O. BOX 6762, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33405, PHONE (407) 844-4992 June 30, 1991 Plorida Game & ]lresh Water :B'ish Commission Everglades Regional Office Non-Game Division 551 N. Military Trail West Palm Beach, :F'la. Re: Woolbright Place PUD Tradewinds Development Boynton Beach, Fla. Gentlemen: It has been called to the attention of Rosa Durando, President of the Audubon Society of the Everglades and Stella Rossi, Boynton resident and member of the Coalition for Wilderness Islands, that gopher tortoise exist on the undeveloped portion of the Tradewinds Development._ At their request, we accompanied several local residents who walk their animals near this property, and we did witness several very large gopher tortoise migrating and feeding on site. We therefore have no doubt that dens do exist on this undeveloped property which is scrub habitat. This letter is to notify your office of the presence of gopher tortoise, a protected species, on the above described development. SincerelYt ? ~a--k ijosa Durando, President (407 965-2420) cc: City of Boynton Beach fA -.J l )).l ---- January 14, 1991 Tradewinds Group Mr. Chris Cutro, Director Planning Department City of Boynton Beach P . O. Box 3 1 0 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 RE: Duplex Units Woolbright PUD/POD 3 Dear Mr. Cutro: Congress Corporate Plaza 902 Clint Moore Road Suite 124 Boca Raton, FL 33487 (407) 994-3133 Based upon the meeting that Michael Morton and I had with you in December and the telephone conversation that we had last week, I have directed my Planner to work on the alternat.ive "A" version of the three plans we presented you for the above referenced. If you recall, this variation did not leave a "park" at the end of the Ocean Drive which is what the Parks and Recreation Department favors. As soon as the Site Plan is prepared I will bring it in for your review. It is our intention to commence development of these units immediately. ~Yours. David J evy DJL/dob RECEIVED JAM 1'1 Cf \ PLANNING DEPT. - ".. J. SCOTT MILLER 'IT" lANAGER FLORIDA GAME AND FRESH WATER FISH COMMISSION DON WRIGHT Orlando QUINTON L. HEDGEPETH, DDS Miami MRS. GILBERT W. HU~IPHREY Miccosukee JOE \IARLlN IIILlJARD Clt'wiston BE:'ti ROWE Gainesville ROBERT M. BRANTLY, Executive Director ALLAN L. EGBERT. Ph. D., Assistant Executive Director FARRIS BRYA:'tiT BUILDING 620 South ~Ieridian Street Tallahassee. Florida 32399-1600 1904) 4~~.1960 September 23, 1991 Mr. Kevin Hallahan Forester/Environmentalist City of Boynton Beach Post Office Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 Mr. Hallahan: Mark Robson of our West Palm Beach office asked me to bring you up to date regarding gopher tortoise relocation permits that have been issued in association with the Woolbright Place development project in Palm Beach County. Dr. Ron Gaby has two permits to relocate tortoises from the P.U.D. and P.C.D. portions of Woolbright Place, both of which expire on 31 January 1992. Nine tortoises were removed under the P.C.D. permit in February 1990. Approximately 15 tortoises remain on the P.U.D. site. The original permit for the P.D.D. calls for establishment of a gopher tortoise preserve onsite. Since the second permit was issued (in March 1990), no construction activity has occurred in the P.D.D., and very little work has been completed for the onsite preserve. Concerns expressed by Mr. Robson about the permanence and suitability of the proposed onsite preserve have led Dr. Gaby and representatives of the Tradewinds Group to seek an alternative relocation site. We have informed Dr. Gaby by phone that we would look favorably on a revised relocation proposal, and that such a revision could be achieved through an amendment to their current permit (No. WR9004l). On 15 August 1991, Mr. Robson met with Dr. Gaby and Mr. David Levy. At that time, Mr. Robson was made aware of the removal of fill from certain areas on the Woolbright Place property. One such area was within the P.C.D., from which all tortoises have already been relocated. Another area north of the retention lake was shown to Mr. Robson which was proposed for further fill removal. That area had been surveyed by Dr. Gaby and no tortoises were reported to occur there. A third fill pile is located within the P. U. D. boundary, and Mr. Robson asked Mr. Levy not to disturb that site because of potential harm to gopher tortoises. Mr. Levy gave verbal assurance that the area inside the P. U. D. boundary would not be disturbed until the relocation of tortoises was accomplished. RECEI'lED Recycled lS\ Paper SEP 27 1991 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE Mr. Kevin Hallahan September 23, 1991 Page Two I hope this clarifies the current status of things for you. Please contact me or Mr. Robson if you have any questions or need further information. Regards, ~ a .vJ~ Don A. Wood Endangered Species Coordinator W666/666-0777/crh LTC 6-20 (Gaby) cc: Mr. Mark Robson Major James Ries Mr. Tim O'Meara Dr. Ron Gaby Mr. David Levy .AEMORANDU^ ,. TO Charles Frederick, Director Recreation & Park Department DA.T~ 18 February '86 "'L~ FIIIO" John Wi1dner Parks Superintendent SUBJItCT Maintenance Impact Woolbright Place Subdivision As you requested, I have reviewed the Masterplan for the Wool- bright Place Subdivision as it pertains to additional mainten- ance responsibilities for the Parks Division. The following information is provided: 1. There is approximately .5 miles of landscaped median runn- ing along SW 8th Street. This will require approximately six hours per week for a three person crew to maintain. The developer should be required to submit a landscape and irrigation plan to the city for approval prior to our assuming ~aintenance. 2. The developer or Property Owners Association should be responsible for all landscape maintenance on side sec- tions of SW 8th Street, as well as any other public or pr i vate streets or R-;-O. W. 3. The developer or Property Owners Association should be responsible for landscape maintenance of a~Lbuffer areas and private recreation areas. Maintenance of the six acres public recreation area will, of course, be the city's responsibility. . U IA/~ Jpn Wil dner . JW: ad . ~~ - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 90-311 December 21, 1990 TO: J. Scott Miller City Manager RECErvm .. FROM: Vincent A. Finizio Administrntivp Coordinntor of EnRinpprfnR .Jet; ~., I ~ ...,... ~ .PLANNII~Gi DEPT. - ,- RE: TRADEWINDS GROUP · MICHAEL MORTON'S LETTER OF NOVEMBER 20. 1990 WOOLBRIGHT PLACE PUD. PLAT 11 RECORDING OF FINAL PLAT 10 response to your most recent request for information regarding the above referenced subject matter, please find the attached Land Development Permit issued to Mr. Morton on November 21, 1990, including the Gee & Jenson, November 20, 1990 letter which was originally attached and made a part of the City's Land Development Permit. Additionally, please find a letter of trans- mittal. dated Novembet 21, 1990, which indicates that Mr. David Levy, Vice President of the Tradewinds Group, received the mylar reproducibles which were executed by the Mayor, City Clerk and City Engineer, sheets 1 of 3 thru sheets 3 of 3. It should be noted that the conditions of Commission approval include the provision that Tradewinds Group complies with the criteria set forth in the Gee & Jenson letter. As Mr. Levy and Mr. Morton possess the plat document this office has no input or control relative to when and how Mr. Morton submits the plat to the Clerk of Palm Beach County. It should be noted however, that in accordance with Concurrency Management Ordinance No. 90-18, Section 19-83(a)(1), the Tradewinds Group must record the final plat for Woolbright Place PUD, Plat #1 within 18 months of preliminary plat approval, The time limit specified in this section for the expiration of development orders and permits shall supercede any time limits set forth elsewhere in the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. Expiration of a planned zoning district master plan as set forth in this article, however, shall cause the development order for same to expire only with respect to exemption determinations, cer~ifications of concurrency and conditional certifications. and shall no~~ by itself, cause the zoning for the planned zoning district to expire. It is my understanding that Tradewinds Group has not yet obtained a modification for their South Florida Water Management Permit to insure the proper water quality treatment is occurring within the PCD or off-site of the PCD before discharging into the retention lake. I have attached for your review and consideration, the agenda item for the final plat approval. Should you require additional information, I am available at any time. ~':c'~~~ 'A:' F~~i~~L > . (j " VAF/ck t.1\. cc: Gee & Jenson, W.Richard Staudinger - Christopher Cutro, Director of Planning