The URL can be used to link to this page

CORRESPONDENCE 04/ 04 /96 THl' 10> 06 F AJ 305 448 98).0 eeL CONSULTA~TS INC. 141001 2355 SALlEDO ST SUITE 202 CORAL GABLES. flORIDA 33134 TEl; l305) 448-8955 FAX: 13051 44B.981 0 @ ~ n \~7 ;~ '"";~L CONSULTANTS, INC. I u I ,.~.;; LandsclJI>> Architects I L 1 Environmental COflSuitants PLANNING f.,NO l __4.lUQ p-ijtiJi1fRrsl'!I}'-fll.~ sum 100 POMPANO BEACH. fLORIllA 33064 TEL: 1954) 974.2200 FAX: 18541 973-2686 2603 MAITlAND CENTER PARKWAY SUITE C MAITlAND. FLORIDA 32751 TEL: (4071660.2120 FAX: 14071875-8308 FA CSIMILE TRANSMISSION DATE: ADril 4. 1996 FROM: Louis R. CamDen".. Jr.. P,E.. P.L.S. TO: Th. City of Bovnton Beech A TTN: Ms. Tambri Hevden FAX NUMBER: (407) 375-6357 ....._._..._._--~ Cracker Barr.1 and rWooJbriaht Piece PUO \ --- // RE: ceL PROJECT NO.: 3629 & 3101 3 (INCLUDING COVER) NUMBER OF PAGES: REMARKS: ........~.....~.................T..............t...t.........~.+......................+...~...+...t+.~.+.......+....~............~..._....... NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY Tkil '.wIIIII, ",.y COli";" inf.m.tilNl tMt is priIIil". ,. anfirhnti.lllmJ/tJr .xempt 'mID direltJ.ure ullier .pplitllbl. law. Thi~ tretn/lliuiall Isllltfllldld 'DI.ly 10, th. ImJivid. 0' tlnt/t, """tad .btw.. If ,tlU In nDI tN intelldtHl rw/piIIIIt Dr tlte tIIIIplDye. 0' "HI /NpfIMiJJf. fo, deUllllTitlfl it tD . intlltltl_ IWiplllll4 you ,hauld /Jodl/'tand tllat .ny distribution. upyin, D' 1111 01 the Int.matiDn tIIRt,il18ll in this ',es;rml. by '/If.'" Dtlw liNI" ,. dnlgn,l. rseiplent ;s un.l/monled .mJ strkt/v /IrOhlJJited. If you h'lIe nc.ivId mil fle,illlu. in tit,,!; pl.u. immBdi.tlliy notify tlm nnd" lJy t,l.phanB. REPLY TO: _X_ COIW GABLES HMPANO lEACH MAITLAND 04/04/96 THl! 10: 07 FAX 305 448 9810 eeL CONSULTANTS INC. i4l 002 cel CONSULTANTS, INC. Consulting E"9;"..'8 m SurveYO'B PI.nners 2355 SALZEOO STREET, SUITE 202. CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 . (305) 446.8955 . (305) 448.9810 April 3, 1996 VIA FACSIM1LE (407) 375-6357 Ms. Tambri Heyden The City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 ru ~( J:t-- RE: CRACKER BARREL and tJ"It: <',,)/V WOOLBRIGHT PLACE PUD ",J.Y' ,6--(,'1 Shoppes of Woolbright PCD ~ J.J.' . IJ~ eCl Project No. 3629 and 3101 ~ Q... iJ-I'- 4r) . .~~ Dear Tambri: ~. ,p I am in receipt of your April 3, 1996 letter to Mike Morton regarding the above-referenced ~ ~~ 'J" projects. 'have spoken to Mr. Morton regarding the requested information and offer the ../ I following: 01.(- ~ (". } .r- v~~ The traffic analysis (study) is being developed for the PCD and the PUD as a whole and will ;J~~~~ ','.~, be submitted upon completion in the very near future. The water and sewer impact analysis ~ \,;",Y ~ j\!_ will not change as far as the alloted ERe's are concerned on the entire PCD. Minor changes} \ to site specific allocations (i.e., Racetrac = X, Cracker Barrel = Y) are not felt to be significant ls;f7 I ( since we are not requesting a revision to the total ERe's alloted the PCD. ~_ ...:< St-t j Y1'\-1 t.j....~ Shocces of Woolbriaht PCD: Woolbriaht Place PUD r ~-'i;. !~ l" 7'1 (, .fi~' ("S~ t.z.,;) 1/1Jai.:.; ....Jf....;;... ;? ~'-'c.- The traffic study. as discussed above, will be shortly forthcoming; however. the projects submitted will not significantly alter the traffic impacts that were prev'iously approved for this PUD and for the PCD. The master drainage plan will not change at all from what was .submitted and approved during The Vinings at Boynton Beach approval process. The buffer plans will not materially differ from those submitted and approved during The Vinings at Boynton Beach approval process. ) . . /' '.' ! (j l d~ ~ 1v+c ? s- / ..)1J .v h..t+.-\rt-U- s ~ \tv u- ~.- (V..-P- <--. --ft ,~ ~ .(:..--4kv.>,< h' """j 6<- I/- ;..s c<< . !.- Y')- fP I cui J Ie 5) 1t>.< k f,~ &~s -f.v tu 6ll_J>] Hille 04/04/96 THli 10:08 F.iX 305 448 9810 Ms. Tambri Heyden April 3, 1996 Page Two Cracker Barrel eeL CG'\iSl:LTA:'ITS I:'\C. i4J 003 At about 9:00 a.m. this morning, I received a call from someone in your office (I did not take notice of the name) who requested twelve {12} copies of the architectural elevations. This person said that they couldJJ~e..th.e..Jwilding floor plans that are in with your Building Department and dld""not need additional copies. I received your letter by fax at about 1 0:15 a.m. this moming~/I have requested that the project architect forward the architectural elevations to you Department, but! would not expec. t you to receive t.hem befe;~ tomorrow at the earliest.. I .'. . __d""ir. u-.> tJ f- 4f.::y1 k. 1'IJ.LJ.-ut .(tiy fkj. ct,5{1-, h"U--'h \..... _wJMcJ.- ~ " , I would greatly appreciate it if you could verify that the project will receive final approval at fJ~~~ the April 23, 1996 Planning and Development Board meeting and will not need to be heard 1S .~ before the May 7th City Commission meeting. Mr. Morton has requested that I reiterate his OA"\I .[~. demand that there be no delays of these submittals. f 'D-. . flYIiV-O fJ.-t--" . ~" .~ t ". Should you have any questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to P ofrl r L.d k contact me. .r. \-- ~ v LP'"r . ~) tC Sincerely, ~rzANTS.INC. Louis R. Campanil Vice President LRC/yb cc: Mike Morton 1 The Morton Group Brett Nein. A.S.L.A., eCl Consultants, Inc. Jim Cherof, Boynton Beach City Attorney Carrie Parker, Boynton Beach City Manager CCl CONSULTANTS, INC. LAW OrrlCES /T ~ 9~ &: ~~ 9.~ SUITE 1000 1655 PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARO Y%d ~k !JlJead 9~ SS4tJ/ F". MARTIN PERRY .JILL >\. .JARKESY LAURENCE G. LEEDS -_.~~ AREA CODE 407 TELEPHONE e8e-g800 TELEF"AX 686-9812 October 27, 1989 ~ Raymond Rea, Esq. City Attorney City o~ Boynton Beach P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach; F~orida 33425 Ro::;'. ... . Tradewinds/Amended Application Our Fi~e No. 780.14 RECEIVED OCT 30 1989 C'TY ...,..... , · /-~ I 'OR N EY Dear Raymond: if. As per our discussion of October 28~ 1989, I am enclosing the analysis o~ o~f-site traffic improvements for xhe Tradewinds project. The ana~ysis is based on a project development of 320,000 square feet of retai~, 600 dwe~ling units of multi- zamily, and a 1,200 seat/SOD student church. This traxfic ana~ysis anticipates maximum deve~opment of the site, including enhancements, and m~tigates the impact according~y. Please note actu:l buildout of the project may be less. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, t:-Cu~~ t~~ Laurence Leeds LGL/bac Enclosure .---- Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 2627 N.E. 203rd Street (Ives Dairy Road), Suite 207 Miami, Florida 33180 USA Phone: (305) 935-0410 Fax: (30S) 931-1097 October 23, 1989 lfP7 ff3~;- y-1Lf1 Mr. David I.evy Traciew:irds Group Con:;res.s Corporate Plaza 902 Clint M:x:>re Road, Suite 124 Boca Raton, Florida 33487 Fe: Woolbright RJDfBo:ynt:on Beach 1703.09.01 Dear David: iJ' As requested, we have expanjed our !base II link analysis to include the AM am EM peak h.alr periods for each intersecticn ad:h:essed in the Mlrray- Dx1eck & Associates reports of 1986. 'Ihese intersections include: Woolbright Road & Carx]l:ess Avenue Woolbright Road & SW 8th street Woolbright Road & r -95 Di.am:nl swt:hboorrl ranps Woolbright Road & r -95 D.i.am:ni nort:hl:x:JuOO ranps Woolbright Road & Seacrest Boulevard. A I1l1Ili:)er of factors we:r:e inc100ed in the CXl1p.1tatioo which differ fran the 1986 analyses am should be noted. '!be m::xli.ficatioos to the analyses are a result of incx:l:r:porat.iri:J the requit:anen.ts and methodologies set forth in the Traffic Perfonnanoe stan::!ams ~ (TPS) 87-18 of Palm Bead1 COOnty. 'Ihese TPS starrlards we:r:e also the basis for the Ihase II link analysis forwa...-ded to ya1 in naoo form on Sept:ezi:)er 26, 1989. 'Ihe backgrourrl conditions arrl as.c::n"Itions for these intersecticn analyses are therefore consis'-~ with the Ihase II link analysis. Included are the follC7#1in:1 factors and assunptians. 1. E>dst:i.rg traffic vol\.IlreS are based 00 1988 off-peak seasoo, peak hour con:litians. Project b.1i1da.rt: was estimated at 1992. 2. 3. Backgroum ~ on Woolbright Road fran 1988 to 1992 was projected at 4% per year east of 1-95 ani 6% per year west of I- 95. -'"'- [)] __^':'_:'~".'''''''~~l I i ~ l 1 " ~, r I r i . ~ . . i 't} r.- i ; Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Mr. David IE!vy Octdber 23, 1989 Page 'l.Wo 4. Off-peak season CXIUTlts were . ira:eased by 20% to project peak ~son con:ii.tions. 5. 'n1e Palm Beach Camty Traffic Enji.neeri.n:J staff anticipated a 5,000 vehjday diversion onto Woolbright Road fran Boyntcn Beach Ba.1le!vard after the extensial of Woolbri.ght Road to Military Trail. Seventy five (75) peroent of this diversial will occur between Congress ani 1-95. 'lhi.s will add 337 vehicles (9%) durinJ the 1M peak boor aIXi 300 vehicles (86) du:ri.nj the AM peak hoor. . 6. arl.1daIt by 1992 was asc::nroed, for the Boyntcn O:mneroe Center, Pylon Interstate an:i M-r tracts with the potential develql1~lt as identified in Table 1 of the M.u:ray-J)~ & Asscx:iates report, 1986. + 7. Major projects ~ch nust be considered based on the TPS were identified with the assistance of Palm Beach County Plann.i.nJ Depart::Ioont. ~ consist of: Parkwalk Rai.nl:x::M lakes Inii.an Springs Pipers Glerm Cambridge Parle . 1250 D.U. 1020 D.U. 950 D.U. 1700 D.U. 450 D.U.S 8. All projects ~ by the city of Boyntcn Beach since 1986 were identified ani :reviewed with the City staff. M:lst major projects ~ch wcW.d .inpact Woolbright Road are either b.1i.1t or fall ~l belCMtl1e TPS threshold for inc1usioo. '!be iJrpacts are therefore inc1u:1ed within the backgroon:l groilt:h rates. 9. Project develq:mant was based al 320,000 SF of retail, 600 IXJ nulti-family, and a 1200 seatjSOO student dmrdl. . . , , I ! I I ~ I"' r I i , , I Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Mr. David levy October 23,1989 Page 'Ihree 10. Intersection capacity analyses were preparep using the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Researd1 .Boa1:d, Olapt:er 6, Signalized InteJ:secticns. BPMMARY C1P ~ m ATmIN LEVEL C1P tilSKYJ.CB D A. Woolbright Road based 00 Daily Projecticns (.... . ~. Project % of Total Trios 13.1% 19.9% 7.2% SeaIrent I-95 to &W 8th stzeet SW 8th street to 0DJl;-=- <::cn;ress to Military Trail 6 lanes 6 lanes 4 I.anes B. Intersections 1992 Peak Seasc.n L WoolbriQb.t Road & Con:n:-ess Avenue IM-D AM-D WestbanxV5 lanes Acki secord left 'bJm lane Add right tm:n lane Project traffic = 7.5% of Total AM 9.6% of Total 1M 2. WoolbriQb.t Road & SW 8th street East:boorxV 4 lanes Add thinl through-right lane AM-C IM-D , . ... Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Mr. David I.e.vy October 23, 1989 Page Four West:bound/ 4 lanes hXl thi.n1 thl:ough-right lime Nort:hl::xxln1/3 lanes . hXl right 'b.1m lane Southboun:l/3 lanes Const:ruct left, left-thrc:oJ1, right turn lane Project traffic =' 14.1% of Total AM 17.0% of Total 1M 3. Woolbright Road & I-95 ~ ranDS EastbourxV3 lanes hXl right tum lane to I-95 sart:hJ:x;Qod West:bound/3 lanes hXl thl:ough lane as auxili.al:y lane fran I -95 soo:thboorxi ranp right turn. (maintain 2 lanes thl:ough per d.irectim on bri.ckJe) AM-C lM-C Project traffic = 5.0% of total AM 7.3% of Total IM 4. WoolbriQht Road & I-95 Northbourxl RaIII)S AM-C IM-D EastbourxV 4 lanes hXl seocnl left turn lane alto I-95 I1Ol:'t1l1:lo.m Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Mr. David IEvy October 23, 1989 Page Five ~ Nort:hbolnn . On-Ranp Ad:l lane to widen entrance for dual left Project traffic == 5.0% of Total AM 5.9% of Total 1M 5 - Woolbricmt Road & Seacrest Ballevard AM-<: m-p ?' Eastba1rxV 4 lanes Ad:l right tum lane (See di~1C:.si.at) Nort:hbolnn Re-stripe awroach lanes to provide left, left-th.ra:1gh, throogh-right Project traffic == 4.8% of Total AM 5.9% of Total 1M DISCUSSION '!he levels of sezvice reported ani related i.nprovements require nulti~ signal cp:!ratia1 with CCIl'binations of protected am pe.nnissive left turns, as well as split Ii1ases. ~ of the :inprovements listed may not be practical due to exi.sti.ng constraints. '!he seccni left tum lane for the nort:hbourxi I -95 ranp IrOlanent (Int. #t4) would requiJ:e wi.denin:J of the bricl:;e CNer I-95. '!he projected 975 vehicles 1lIaki.n:J this novement cluri.rg the FM peak boor resulted nostly fran background g1:Oi>Ith and seasonal adjUSboonts. Project traffic" fran the Woolbright roo totals 34 vehicles maki.nJ this novement, nostly residential a.rt:bcmxl trips, \Yhich <:alStitutes 3.5% of the total left turn. aarton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Mr. !:avid levy October 23, 1989 Page Six A partial cloverleaf ranp is not feasible due to develqAlt::dt alOR;J the east side of the exi.st..irg ranp. At Woolbright Road am seacr:est Ballevard, a right turn lane is ~()Io~~ded on the e.ast:bo.mi awroach (Int. '5). '1his right tum lane wa.lld require the t:ak.i.rg of canet:ery prcperty. ~ i.ntersecti.cm woold fmx:ti.Q'l at level of seJ:Vice E durin:J the 1M peak hour in peak SE'asal. . t\.1rin:J the off-peak seasa1, it can functiQ'l at IDS-D. Any significant inprovement of this i.rr-~on, Peyorxi the stripin:J am Iilasin:J chan:Jes recxmnen:ied, will require widen.inJ alen:{ the canet:ery frart:age. If yaJ. have arrj' questions, or need further' clarification, please call. Si.nce..""ely, BARD:N-ASaiMAN ASSOCIATES, niC. AOOre GrOenhoff PriIx;ip:U Associate 0-- CC: John Zegeer Joel Wantman AGjbk:tradewin:is Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 2627 N.E. 203rd Street (Ives Dairy Road), Suite 207 Miami, Florida 33180 USA Phone: (305) 935-0410 Fax: (305) 931-1097 FRCM: Iavid U:Ny An:lre Groenhoff M:F.M)RANI:XJM '10: r:M'E October 23, 1989 , SUB:TEX::l' : Woolbright roo Off-site Traffic Inprovement:s Corrlitian: - Palm Beaen cnmty TPS stan:m:ds #87-18 - 1992 Peak Seasa1 - Project I..arrl-Use; 320,000 sf Retai.1, 600 multi- family D.U., Churcb/Sdlool Woolbright Road Ceily projections for 1992 require Woolbright Road to be widened to meet lOS-D starrlan:)s. ~ Segment lanes I -95 to SW 8th street SW 8th st..~ to CorxJreSS Avenue 6 6 Project % of Total TripS 13.1% 19.9% AGjbk:offsite " ~ ./' Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 2627 N.E. 203rd Street (Ives Dairy Road), Suite 207 Miami, Florida 33180 USA Phone: (305) 935-0410 Fax: (305) 931-1097 MEM:>RANDJM '10: D:ivid Isvy F'RCM: Arx'ire Groenhoff DATE Octd::ler 23, 1989 Woolbright :roo Off-site Traffic Inprovements SUBJECI' : O::n::lition: Intersecti.on: - Palm Beach Camty TPS stamal:ds #87-18 - 1992 Peak Season Project Iarxl-Use; 320,000 sf Retail, 600 M.1lti- family D.U., Olurc:b/School Woolbright Road ani Seacrest Ba1levard East:l:xJurxV 4 Lanes 1di right tum lane Nort.h1:Joun:l Inprcvements: It .. Re-stripe awroach lanes to provide left, left-thralgh, through-right Project Inpacts: 4.8% of total AM intersectial volume 5.9% of total IM intersectial volume I1Iproved !evel of Service: AM-C B+-D '!he right tum lane will requiJ:e the takin:.J of canetery pt:q)erty. Withalt this lane, the intersectim woold functiQ'l at level of service E cluri.rg the 1M peak ha1r in peak Sl?ascn. Dlrin:.J the off-peak season, it can function at lDS-D. Any significant inprovement of this intersectiCl'l beyond the striping an.1 phasin:J ~es recxmnerrled, will require wid.eni.nJ alorg the canetery frontage. 'The levels of service reported require nulti~ signal ~tion arrl north/sa.rt:h split Ii1ases. AGjbk: levy ~ 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ***********************************************************.************** INTERSECTION..WOOLBRIGHT ROAD/SEACREST AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST. ......ANDRE GROEN HOFF DATE. ....... ..10/18/89 TIME..........AM PEAK 1992 COMMENT.......ALTERNATIVE 2 PEAK SEASON 1992 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB S8 E8 WB N8 S8 LT 125 111 387 157 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 689 608 335 324 T 12.0 T 12.0 LT 12.0 T 12.0 RT 429 45 147 141 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 100 40 60 60 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (% ) CO Y/N NI'l Nb UN 1'\10 T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 ""4- 0.95 . 25 N 20.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 . 25 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 25 N 23.5 3 S8 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 25 N 23.5 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- r- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH .. 90.0 ~ PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-l PH-Z PH-3 PH-4 E8 LT X X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PO PO WB LT X X 5B LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PO PO GREEN 4.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 27.0 17.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. VIC G/C DEU\Y LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.073 0.411 12.2 8 16.9 C T 0.586 0.333 16.5 C R 0.698 0.333 19.3 C WB L 0.073 0.411 12.2 8 14.0 B """ TR 0.526 0.333 16.0 C N8 L 0.398 0.300 19.2 C 19.1 C TR 0.837 0.300 25.7 0 S8 L 0.496 0.189 25.8 0 21.0 C TR e.632 0.189 22.9 C -.------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION = Delay = 17.6 (sec/veh) VIC = 1. 792 LOS ... C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..WOOLBRIGHT ROAD/SEACREST AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST....~..ANDRE GROENHOFF DATE.. ...... ..10/18/89 TI ME. . . . . . . . . . PM PEAK 1 992 COMMENT.... ...ALTERNATIVE 2 PEAK SEASON 1992 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY E8 WB N8 58 E8 l,.)8 N8 58 LT 247 146 673 145 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 886 930 824 427 T 12.0 T 12.0 LT 12.0 T 12.0 RT 464 144 132 173 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 100 60 60 60 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PEo. BUT. ARR. TYPE O~ ) ( % ) Y/N N!'I Nb Y/N !'Iin T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 , 25 N 20.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 25 N 20.5 3 N8 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 25 N 23.5 3 S8 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 25 N 23.5 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ,. PH-1 E8 LT X TH RT PO WB LT X TH RT PO GREEN 4.0 YELLOW 3.0 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 X NB LT X X TH X X RT X PO X SB LT X X TH X X RT X PO 30.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 27.0 17.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. vIe GIG DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 1.088 0.411 114.5 F 35.0 0 T 0.754 0.333 18.8 C R 0.741 0.333 20.5 C WB L 0.073 0.411 12.2 B 17.7 C TR 0.881 0.333 23.0 C NB L 1.071 0.300 77.3 F 41.9 E LTR 0.999 0.300 38.0 0 .' , sa L 0.458 0.189 25.4 0 23.1 C TR 0.844 0.189 28.5 D INTERSECTION: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LOS = 0 Delay = 29.4 (sec/veh) V/C = 1.880 -~ Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 2627 N.E. 203rd Street (Ives Dairy Road), Suite 207 Miami, Florida 33180 USA Phone: (305) 935-0410 Fax: (305) 931-1097 MEM)RANIXJM '10: ~vid I.evy FRCM: Arrlre Groenhoff Dt\TE October 23, 1989 ~ SUBJECI': Woolbright roo Off-site Traffic Irrprovements Corxlition: - Palm Beadl Camty TPS St.arrlal:ds 1187-18 - 1992 Peak Season - Project Iarrl-Use: 320,000 sf Retail, 600 Multi- family D. U., Churdl/School Intersection: Woolbright Road am sw 8th street Improvements : Eastl:>oon:V 4 lanes Add a third through-right turn lane Westbourrl/ 4 lanes Add a third through-right turn lane ." ~ Nort:hbc:JurxV3 lanes Add a right-turn lane Project IIrpacts: Sout:hboun:V3 lanes Construct: left, left-through, arrl right-turn lane 14.1% of total AM i.ntersection volume 17.0% of total FM i.ntersection volume Improved Level of Service: AM-C FM-D 'Ihe levels of service :reported am related inproverents require multi-fi1ase signal cperations. AGJbk: dlevy '''''' ~ 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..WOOLBRIGHT ROAD/SW 8TH STREET AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST... ....ANDRE GROENHOFF DATE.. ........10/18/89 TI ME. . . . . . . . . . AM PEAK 1 992 COMMENT.. .....WORSE CASE ALT LAND USE 2 PEAK SEASON -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 252 416 97 152 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 1663 914 10 27 T 12.0 T 12.0 LT 12.0 LT 12.0 RT 388 216 109 215 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 RR 80 80 60 80 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- , ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE OU ( 7. ) Y/N NI"I Nb Y/N 1"1 in T E8 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 20 N 20.5 3 wa 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 20 N 20.5 3 ~'O 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 26.5 3 ...., .. 5B 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 26.5 3 .. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PH-l EB LT X TH RT PO '.JB L T X TH RT PO GREEN 16.0 YELLOW 3.0 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 X NB LT X X TH X X RT X PO X S8 LT X X TH X X RT X PO 36.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 10.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C GIC DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.396 0.611 7.2 8 22.1 C TR 0.958 0.400 24.0 C 1 WB L 0.961 0.611 39.4 0 20.7: C TR 0.508 0.400 13.3 8 r~B L 0.313 0. 1 11 28.3 0 25.5 D LT 0.259 0.111 23.8 C R 0.295 0.1.11 24.0 C S8 L 0.306 0.178 24.6 C 18.7 C LT 0.290 0.178 20,8 C R 0.254 0.356 13.3 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------- I :;TERSECTI ON: Delay == 21.5 (sec/veh) VIC == 0.790 LOS == C )- - 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..WOOLBRIGHT ROAD/SW 8TH STREET AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST.. ... ..ANDRE GROENHOFF DATE... ..... ..10/10/89 TIME. .. .. .. .. . PM PSH 1992 COMMENT. ......WORSE CASE ALT LAND USE 2 PEAK SEASON -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 371 218 564 263 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 9S8 1933 48 18 T 12.0 T 12.0 LT 12.0 LT 12.0 RT 192 319 643 351 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 RR 80 80 250 230 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 , -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV AOJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE ( 7. ) ( % ) YIN NM Nb Y/N Pl1n T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 20 N 20.5 3 -, WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 20 N 20.5 3 t{ .. rJB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 26.5 3 S8 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 26.5 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ...~ PH-l EB L T X TH RT PO WB LT X TH RT PO GREEN 11.0 YELLOW 3.0 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 X N8 LT X X TH X X RT X PO X 58 LT X X TH X X RT X PO 38.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 21.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. VIC G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS E8 L 1 .132 0.578 110.9 F 37.1- 0 "- TR 0.489 0.422 12.3 B WB L 0.416 0.578 8.6 B 26.0 D TR 0.993 0.422 27.7 0 N8 L 0.866 0.233 37.3 0 55.4 E LT 0.692 0.233 23.2 C R 1 .124 0.233 93.3 F 58 L 1.060 0.089 107.9 F 61.2 F LT 0.820 0.089 41.8 E R 0.383 0.211 20.0 C -------------------------------------------------------------------------- HJTERSECTION: Delay = 37.6 (sec/veh) VIC = 1.057 LOS = D , Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 2627 N.E. 203rd Street (!ves Dairy Road), Suite 207 Miami, Florida 33180 USA MEM:>RANIlJM 'IO: FRCM: Ill\TE suanx::.r : Corrlition : Intersection: Inprovements: b Note: Proj ect IIrpacts: Phone: (305) 935-0410 Fax: (305) 931-1097 nwid levy Arxire Groenhoff 0ctd:Jer 23, 1989 Woolbright IUD Off-site Traffic Ilrprovements - Palln Beam Camty TPS stan:3ards #87-18 - 1992 Peak Season - Project I.arx:l-Use; 320,000 sf Retail, 600 Multi- family D.U., Churdl/Sdlool Woolbright Road am I -95 Sout:h.boorx:l Ranps Eastl:xxlrxV3 Ianes (west of I -95) Add right 'b.nn auxiliazy lane to I -95 sa.rt:h raJll) Westl:n.mV3 lanes (west of I-95) Add throogh lane as auxiliary lane fran I -95 sart:h off-ranp right 'b.nn Maintain 2 throogh lanes per direction Oller I -95. 5.0% of total AM intersection volume 7.3% of total IM intersection volume Improved level of Sel:vice: AM-C IM-C '!he levels of service reported am related inprovenvants require multi-pmse signal operations. AGjbk: davlevy [6J ~--~- - ': 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..WOOLBRIGHT ROADII-95 SB RAMPS AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST... ... .AG DATE. ...... ...10/18/89 TIME..........AM PEAK 1992 COMMENT... ....ALTERNATIVE 2 LAND USE PEAK SEASON -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB S8 LT 0 568 0 701 T 12.0 L 12.0 12.0 L 12.0 TH 1125 892 0 0 T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 L 12.0 RT 621 0 0 726 R 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 RR 100 0 0 100 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE ( % ) ( % ) Y/N Nl'l Nb Y/N l"I1n T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 '4 0.95 " 0 N 11.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 0 N 11.5 3 NB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 1.00 0 N 20.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 0 N 20.5 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- (: SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 if" PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT TH X TH RT X RT PO PO WB LT X SB LT X TH X X TH RT RT X PO PO GREEN 31.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. VIC GIC DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB T 0.957 0.333 29.2 0 24.4 C R 0.636 0.556 9.8 B WS L 0.984 0.344 46.7 E 22.0 C T 0.359 0.711 3.3 A SB L 0.972 0.222 45.7 E 26.2 D ",-, R 0.455 0.933 0.4 PI ~ .' " -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 24.7 {sec/veh} V/C", 1.203 LOS .. C 1985 HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT .*+.++*++*+*******************************.**************************+**** INTERSECTION. .WOOLBRIGHT ROAD/I-95 58 RAMPS AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANAL YS T . . . . . . . AG DATE.. ........10/18/89 TIME...... .:..PM PEAK 1992 COMMENT..... ..ALTERNATIVE 2 LAND USE PEAK SEASON -------------------------------------------------------------------------- , VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB E8 WB NB S8 LT 0 348 0 756 T 12.0 L 12.0 12.0 L 12.0 TH 1358 1548 0 0 T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 L 12.0 RT 534 0 0 904 R 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 RR 100 0 0 100 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- AOJUSTMENT FACTORS GRAOE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR.TYPE ( 7. ) UU Y/N NM Nb Y/N Plin T E8 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95. 0 N 14.3 3 WS 0.00 2.00 N 0 ,,4 0.95 ' 0 N 14.3 3 r~8 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 1.00 0 N 25.8 3 58 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 0 N 25.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 . PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 (> E8 LT NB LT TH X TH RT X RT PO PO i ':> LT X S8 LT X w~ TH X X TH RT RT X PO PO GREEN 20.0 38.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 23.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. vie GIC OELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB T 0.950 0.422 24.5 C 21.2 C R 0.452 0.678 4.5 A W8 L 0.974 0.222 55.7 E 17.5 C T 0.680 0.678 S.1 B 58 L 0.950 0.256 39.6 0 23.0 C R 0.609 0.933 0.8 A ~ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay'" 21.7 (sec/veh) V/C", 1.317 LOS '" C ./- . Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 2627 N.E. 203rd Street (Ives Dairy Road), Suite 207 Miami, Florida 33180 USA Phone: (305) 935-0410 Fax: (305) 931-1097 MEM:>RANIXJM ':ID: ravid Isvy FRCM: Andre Groenhoff Dt\.TE October 23, 1989 Woolbright RJD Off-Site Traffic Inpl:UVements SUBJECT: Con:lition: - Palm Beach cnmty TPS stan::1ards #87-18 - 1992 Feak Season - Project I.an1-Usei 320,000 sf Retail, 600 1Illl.ti- family D. U., Olurdl/Sdlool Intersection: Woolbright Rocid am Ccn:j.r:ess Avenue In'proveroents : Westl:x:mx:V5 lanes I.". , Project In;:acts: - Add a secorxi left tunl lane - Add a right turn lane 7.5% of total AM intersecti.on volume 9.6% of total m intersecti.cn volume I.nproved leVel of Service: AM-<t p IM-D '!he levels of service rep::>rted am related inproveroents requLre m.1l.ti-pw;e signal cperation. AGjbk: intersection """ [6] 19~5 HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** r INTERSECTION..WOOLBRIGHT RD/CONGRESS AVE AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST.. .....ANDRE GROENHOFF DATE.. ........10/18/89 TIME...... ....AM PEAK 1992 COMMENT.......ALTERNATE LAND USE 2 PEAK SEASON 1992 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLU~IES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB N8 58 LT 255 535 46 710 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 808 394 357 618 T 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 RT 85 252 496 195 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 40 200 200 60 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG 8USES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE ( ~~ ) ( % ) Y/N NM Nb Y/N l"Iin T E8 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 25 N 32.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 ' 25 N 32.5 3 N8 0.00 2.00 N 0 '4 0.95 25 N 26.5 3 58 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 25 N 26.5 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 '" EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PO PO WS LT X S8 LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PO PO GREEN 15.0 24.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 18.0 21.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE 6RP. V/C GIC DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. lOS E8 L 0.949 0.167 56.6 E 35.7 0 TR 0.922 0.267 29.2 0 WB L 0.989 0.167 54.9 E 37.9 0 T 0.419 0.267 17.7 C R 0.131 0.267 16.2 C NB L 0.071 0.200 22.2 C 19.1 C TR 0.569 0.233 20.1 C 't S8 L 1 .094 0.200 86.0 F 49.6' E TR 0.630 0.233 20.6 C -------------------------------------------------------------------------- WTERSECTION: Delay = 37.0 (sec/veh) vIe = 1.029 LOS = 0 llif 1 n -.'111 - Tf - .-_. ----IT ~ 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..WOOLBRIGHT RD/CONGRESS AVE AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST... ....ANDRE GROENHOFF DATE. .........10/18/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . . PM PEAK 1992 COMMENT.......ALTERNATE LAND USE 2 PEAK SEASON 1992 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY E8 WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 211 645 85 538 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 548 928 703 667 T 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 RT 70 585 688 261 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 40 200 200 60 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV AOJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PEO. BUT. ARR. TYPE ( ;~ ) ( i. ) Y/N NM Nb Y/N l'Iin T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 ''',4 0.95 25 N 32.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 25 N 32.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 25 N 26.5 3 S8 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 25 N 26.5 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ( SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 liP... PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-3 PH-4 PH-2 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PO PO WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X FO PO GREEN 17.0 24.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 14.0 23.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C GIC DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS E8 L 0.667 0.189 29.2 0 22.1 C TR 0.625 0.267 19.5 C US L 1.052 0.189 70.7 F 50.0 E T 0.987 0.267 37.5 0 R 0.978 0.267 45.5 E " NB L 0.168 0.156 25.1 0 26.'1 0 TR 0.942 0.256 29.5 0 . S8 L 1.066 0.156 79.7 F 40.8 E TR 0.668 0.256 20.2 C -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 37.2 {sec/veh} V/C = 1.027 LOS = 0 I \ ~. . Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 2627 N.E. 203rd Street (Ives Dairy Road). Suite 207 Miami, Florida 33180 USA Phone: (305) 935-0410 Fax: (305) 931-1097 FRCM: David levy Arxlre Groenhoff MEM:>RANJ:XJM '10: mTE Oct:d:ler 23, 1989 ~ SUBJECl': Woolbright roo Off-site Traffic Inprovements O:>rrlition : - Palm Beadl Camty TPS starrlards #87-18 - 1992 Peak season - Project I.arxi-Use; 320,000 sf Retail, 600 Multi- family D.U., Olu:rdl/Sdlcx>l Woolbright Road arrl I -9~ Nort:hbourxi Ramps East:bouzXV3 lanes Add secorrl left turn lane onto I -95 nort:hbourxi. Intersection: IIrprovements : ~. i1> Nort:hbourxi On-Ranp Add lane to widen entrance for dual left Proj ect L"tlpClcts: 5.0% of total AM intersection volume 5.9% of total IM intersection volume I1iproved level of Service: AM-C R+-D '!he secx:>rrl left turn lane for the nort:hbourxi I -95 ranp ItY.JVe.ment will require widenirq of the bridge over 1-95 or ranp relocation (east). 'lbe projected 975 vehicles lIlakiIq this ItY.JVement durirg the B-1 peak hour resulted JroStiy fran backgrc:mxl ~ arrl seasonal adjustments. Project traffic fran the Woolbright roo totals 34 vehicles makin:J this ItY.JVement, nostly residential cutbourrl trips, whidl constitutes 3.5% of the total left turn. A partial clmlerleaf ranp is not feasible due to develq:ment al<nJ the exi.stin1 ramp. ", AGjbk: david ~ ,~,~ :/ i)li .:, I '..',< '985 HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT *****~*********************************************.********************** INTERSECTION..WOOLBRIGHT/I-95 NB RAMPS AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST. ......ANDRE GROENHOFF DATE.. .....;..10/18/89 T I ME. . . . . . . . . . AM PEAK 1 992 COMMENT.......ALTERNATE 2 PEAK SEASON -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 746 0 417 0 L 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 12.0 TH 1 t 59 989 0 0 L 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 12.0 RT 0 602 257 0 T 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 RR 0 100 100 0 T 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 '2.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV AOJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PEo. BUT. ARR. TYPE ( 7. ) ( % ) Y/N NM Nb Y/rJ 1'1 in T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 A 0. 95 ~ 0 N 14.3 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 0 N 14.3 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 0 N 28.8 3 S8 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.95 0 N 28.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- . SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 tf~.. PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X X TH RT RT X PO PO WB LT SB LT TH X TH RT X RT PO PO GREEN 26.0 34.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 21.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEI}EL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.829 0.289 27.1 0 1 S . 1 C T 0.493 0.700 4. 1 A we T 0.773 0.378 17.6 C 18.0 C R 0.580 0.611 7.4 B NB L 0.574 0.233 24.0 C 25.3 0 ''''"' R 0.1 19 0.933 0.1 A 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 20.4 (sec/veh) V/C ... 0.739 LO 5 = C -1/.01. r- ~~. ~'--~"---"'-r-.~Ir __......!I>.m..Jt>,___,~ 1985 HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..WOOLBRIGHT/I-95 NB RAMPS AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALyST.......ANDRE GROENHOFF DATE.. ..... ...10/18/89 TI ME. . . . . . . . . . PM PEAK 1992 COMMENT... ....ALTERNATE 2 PEAK SEASON -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY E8 WB NB S8 EB W8 NB S8 LT 975 0 742 0 L 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 12.0 TH 1135 1090 0 0 L 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 12.0 RT 0 1080 652 0 T 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 RR 0 100 100 0 T 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (/~ ) no Y/N N(Y\ Nb Y/N (Y\in T E8 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 ' 0 N 14.3 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 0 N 14.3 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 0 N 28.8 3 58 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 0 N 28.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 ~8 LT X N8 LT X TH X X TH RT RT X PO PD ~8 LT SB LT TH X TH RT X RT PO PD GREEN 28.0 32.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 21.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LfI.NE GRP. V/C GIC DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.966 0.311 37.9 0 21.3 C T 0.463 0.700 4.0 A WB T 0.869 0.356 21.4 e 44.7 E R 1 .129 0.589 74.4 F rm L 0.980 0.233 46.3 E 27.8 0 R 0.401 0.933 0.3 A 'I -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 29.1 (sec/veh) vie = 1.093 LOS = D "'" ,_.LO.6.1..........tJ.~~;~r:.r.J:i".."::; ,.....J.>..:. .;.~ ./.I..,;~L;.:..~_.~_:".;.;.':, ""':';.J:~~..c:~,..o;.'J:.I;:;(Z;..~';'J..(h"&1. ,:-;'1,' ,....,~'_.....w I MEMORANDUM December 14, 1989 TO: Mayor and city commission FROM: Timothy Cannon, Interim Planning Director , THROUGH: sharon Randolph, Interim city Manager RE: Road Improvements for Woolbright Place PCD (Increased Floor Area) The following memorandum addresses the road improvements which are to be required in conjunction with the increased floor area for the Woolbright Place Planned Commercial Development (PCD). Ordinance 89-39, which was adopted at the October 31, 1989 City Commission meeting, approved the PCD. This ordinance included a provision that ".. .the applicant shall be permitted to construct an additional 121,000 square feet of commercial building area over and above that permitted by the aforementioned stipulation and Settlement Agreement (see Section 4 of attached ordinance 89-39). seciion 4 of this ordinance also specified that "This additional square footage of commercial development shall require off-site traffic improvements identified in the October 23, 1989 Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., traffic report, attached hereto and incorporated herein, sUbject to final approval or modification of said reports' findings by the City Commission on November 7, 1989, The applicant, Tradewinds Development, Inc. has consented to changing the November 7, 1989 date in order to allow the City staff to evaluate the Barton-Aschman traffic report and formulate a recommendation to the City Commission. This delay was necessary because the Barton-Aschman report was submitted on October 30, 1989--the day before the adoption of Ordinance 89-39, and because the Barton-Aschamn report is not 'sufficient with respect to detailing the assumptions and methodology to allow the report to be evaluated in and by itself. The Barton-Aschman report evaluated the entire project, meaning the PUD and PCD combined, including the enhancements which. were the subject of an agreement between Tradewinds and the City (see attached letter from F. Martin perry, dated October 31, 1989). The project was reviewed in accordance with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance standards Ordinance which is currently in effect in the unincorporated area of Palm Beach County, except that Level of Service (LOS) "D" was used rather than the LOS "C" which is currently specified in the Traffic Performance standards Ordinance. The improvements which would be required in order to maintain LOS liD II according to Barton-Aschman, are listed under Column 2 in the table which is contained in the attached report prepared by Walter H. Keller Jr, Inc. Walter Keller also evaluated the entire project, including the enhancements, using the same standards as Barton-Aschman, an came up with a somewhat different list of road improvements, which are shown in Column 3. The improvements which were required as a part of the 1986 settlement stipulation , are listed in Column 1. Therefore, if the applicant limited the project to the mix and intensity of uses specified in the 1986 settlement stipulation, only those road improvements listed under Column 1 would be required. In view of the fact that the road improvements for the uses specified in' the 1986 settlement stipulation have alrady been specified, the applicant would be required to mitigate only tMe additional traffic created by the enhancements, in accordance with the code requirements which were in effect at the date that the enhancements were approved (October 31, 1989). section 9.C,4.h.(5) of Appendix A--Zoning of the City's Code of Ordinances states that, when property is rezoned, a traffic impact analysis must be submitted. This section states specifically that "The format and analysis shall be the same as those which are required by Palm Beach county, with the exception of the requirements listed above. Such traffic impact analysis shall include recommendations for the mitigation of traffic impacts, consistent with the standards which have been adopted or are utilized by Palm Beach County." (a copy of Section 9.C.4.h.(5) is attached). Therefore, the enhancements have been evaluated by Walter Keller with respect to the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance standards Ordinance. Column 4 shows the road improvements which would be required in accordance with the Trffic Performance standards ordinance, in order to maintain Level of service liCit. It is the Planning Department's recommendation that road improvements for the additional commercial square footage include, at a minimum, the improvements listed in column 4. These improvements consist of the following: (1) 6-laning of Woolbright Road from Congress Avenue to Interstate 95 (2 additional lanes); (2) The widening the Woolbright Road overpass at Interstate 95 to allow for an additional eastbound through land and westbound through lane; and (3) The addition of second eastbound right turn land at the I-95/woolbright Road interchange. The additional improvements listed in the Barton-Aschman report would be desirable, from the standpoint of traffic safety and efficiency, but would not be required by the Code of Ordinance requirements which were in effect on October 31, 1989. The road improvements which are to be required for the woolbright Place PCD will need to be bonded as a condition of the. approval of the final plat. Costs estimates and a timetable for their completion would need to be submitted with the preliminary plat. The total package of road improvements that would need to be bonded would consist of the road improvements which were required by the 1986 court settlement, plus the road improvements which are required in accordance with Section 4 of Ordinance 89-39. Timothy Pr Cannnon ., . . '. ~?Ii;, -:'~. .~'I. \':. ,-" - ~ , \\ <.1 d ) ~..-. J!iJ .;.;,-(...'~"I1"'~~Z~!:~~:::::):~:~:::':!!2!,':::::,~~~~.l:I1I.. _ , , xhibi t liE II, ":\?' Ii'I I I I II :/ II Ii , I I I I I , ORDINANCE NO. 89-39 , , AN ORDINi\IICE OF THE CI'l'Y COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEr\CH, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 80-19 OF SAID CITY PURSUANT TO AN ORDER OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIF'rEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT BY REZONING SEVERAL PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, FROM R-1A (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL). R-3 (MULTIPLE-FAMILY DWELLING) AND C-2 (NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL) TO PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT; PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL ,SQUARE FOOTAGE OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT; SAID PARCELS BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, AMENDING THE REVISED ZONING MAP ACCORDINGLY, PROVIDING THAT ALL DEVELOPMENT OF SAID PROPERTY SHALL PROCEED IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS AS SUBMITTED AND APPROVED AND ALL APPLICABLE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, PROVIDING A CONFLICTS CLAUSE; A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, AND AN 'EFFECTIVE 'DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, has heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 80-19 in which a Revised Zoning Map was adopted for said City, and WHEREAS, ~ieran J. Kilday. as agent for the applicant, Tradewinds Development Corp.. d/b/a TRADEWINDSGROUP, and the owners of the subject parcels, has heietofore filed a Petition with the City of Boynton Beach, Florida pursuant to Section 9 of Appendix A-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances, City of Boynton Beach, Florida for the purpose of rezoning certain parcels of land consisting of approximately 28.8455 acres (:I:) located wi thin the municipal limits of said City,' said property being more particularly described hereinafter, ~,:) from R-1A ('Single Family Residential District) , R-3 (Multiple-Family D\.;elling District) and C-2 (N~ighborhood ..,: I. ! , ~ I Commercial District) to Planned Commercial Development, WHEREAS, the City Commission entered into a Stipulation , and Settlement Agreement which was approved by Judge . :<' ',' ',' i~ ,;1 J.. , i...t"..'" :.~ } ;,. ".'i '. . ~ -[,." ',';- ,'~ ,~t: ..I ' il,iti', ' -4 t.. I ,,~i:~~ ,,";~"1l';,~.\\.~ - - '., . .~, ...l"'t ;,ff.,. "ll:':' (dn~ '\ .;i.*E~;l/ , . ."'.;' II....!~..{, .t", '.' ..~ ."i....t) <I.~.' !i' 'J"i 'l:'(j 1 ~: .. Th i:Y M ,"') '"--'-' ~.. -j '".___~_~~~__.__ ._...........~......i.&1.i...i'~.J'...~~_"'--' '-'l'J!-::r.t"~rrJ"1 I, 'I rr... I', }~f~*j ) : '. 1" ", ..'~,:_~-' ,~~_.i. ; It .. ;&L::,l ? ~t.,' ", :t;.,'1 .....: ::,~ ".'1K' ., i..~.;.\I.;f :[i1{;\~,:.,. .' ., .:' );<~~;'';: :: li:\:;;':~:o:: .- ':~: :~"!1< .:.~,:. :,. ,'}~ 'I \~ ;, -\.~'~.I . :,,;:_~~_' ~:~~: ,..4.. .~:...,.'i, i: ~l. ;::.i)~/.:"~~,j Al ;>:;~.~.'F.i' . :!.: .'~riri\ .::~.. ',:;:.:. ~ ' I 'I I I I I \1, from the Fourth District Court of ~ppeal on July 22', 1988, 1 I I I I' II II II !I 1\ II II II :1 \ I Rudnick's Order ~pproving Settlement ~greement on November 6, 1986. and subject to a further Order by Judge Rudnick on January 27. 1987. and subject also to a Mandate and opinion which affirmed the trial court's Orders. and subject 'also to Judge Rodger's Order Granting ~radewinds Motion for Contempt on october 21. 1988. and lastly, subject to the Fourth District Court of Appeals Per Curiam Mfirmation of Judge I . ;, ,\:. Rodger's Contempt Order on June 7. 1989. copies of which are ,. all attached hereto, and the City Commission is, therefore, ..,', ';.: being required to comply with the aforesaid Stipulation and Settlement ~greement. WHERE1\S, ,the Circuit for the 15th Judicial Court Circuit on the 31st day of. October. 1989. issued an or~er " amending the City's 1986 comprehensive Plan in conformance _~I~.-.~"~. with the above mentioned Stipulation and settlement . .. .~... .. ~greement. Said Order being attached hereto and t. ":~Nl' " i 'I . . Ut.;I'I;,.lIo.IlI~_ 1 I ! L.. ~ncorporated herein, NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEi\Clt, FLORID~: section 1. That the foll.owing described land, \. located in the City of Boynton Beach. Florida, to wit: See attached Exhibit ,,~" i. be and the same is hereby rezoned from R-l~ (Single-Family ... ... Residential District) R-3 (Multiple-Family Dwelling !( 'i, .. jI:~ .', ',' III ,.- ~ ../ ;l~' ;'1:'.:"( .... 1,: I ;' .~ " I' '.{ i H'i '., . :T i l..,~ . . District), and C-2 (Neighborhood Commercial District) to Plafined Commercial Development, which use is determined to I be appropriate, under the circumstances agreed upon by the City in said Stipulation and Settlement ~greement, and in conformity with the comprehensive plan of the City of II'," ", Boynton.Beach. Florida. " Section 2. That the aforesaid Revised Zoning Map of, the City shall be ~mended accordingly. 2 . J. ,~.i . " " ;~~ " ...~ -.'~"~'~J"t.!lJ.."::'~"'~,.f",""'~'L-~~:"""'-""~-'" J I ~ection 3,. That the application of the owners and agents of the subject property for rezoning is hereby granted for the purpose of permitting the development of said land as a Planned Commercial Development (PCD) specifically in accordance with the aforementioned Stipu1a tion and Set tlement Agreement and Court Orders in Case No. 86-3661 (CLlA, all which respectively enforced the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement and found this City in contempt of court. Except as provided herein. the Applicant shall proceed to file site plans of any part or all of the PCD for review by the appropriate departments of the City government i'n accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach. and the site plans shall also be subject to review with respect to subdivision. platting, building permitting, and any or all applicable rules and regulations of any governmental entity having jurisdiction over land development and bUilding permitting within the City of Boynton Beach. Section 4. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Ordinance. the applicant shall be permitted to construct an additional 121.000 square feet of commercial building area over and above that permitted by the aforementioned Stipulation. and Settlement Agreement. This additional square footage of commercial development shall require off-site traffic improvements identified in the October 23. 1989. Barton-Aschman. Associates, Inc., traffic report. attached hereto and incorporated herein, subject to final approval or modification of said reports' findings by the City Commission on November 7. 1989. Section 5, That ordinances all or parts of otdinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby ~-,a: ,-j~.-. ' o repealed. 3 ~ : '. --~.:,w.. '-h~ .. .'~ _. -' ....i.. ~ _ ._......-..- , , ", ........... . ---..... " \ \. \.. '\ \ \. \. \ \. , ~.:..~ -, 'I , :~ , I " j ;../ I i.". , ~ j : : ~i. i d .-:--~.. _:. ;;;. ;:' ;f t' .. I . Ie: o v (il\ ~ 07........\\ ~j ___~,..,!"--.7'iXc:..'" Section 6. Should any sccti.on or provision of this ordinance or portion hereof. any paragraph'. sentence. or word be declared by a courtl of competent jurisdiction to be invalid. or should any Section of this Ordinance not become effective for any rcas~n, such decision shall not affect the remainder of this ordinance. Section 7. Authority is hereby granted to codify said ordinance. Section 8. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon passage. FIRST READING this 17th day of October. 1989. SECOND. FINAL READING and PASSAGE this ~/~ day of d1; kv . 1989. ~. -~~ Vice Mayor Commissioner ~;on.r /. . tU~/~c; .0 issioner - ATTEST: ~J~ City rk (Corporate Seal) I. 4 ..Xll'~""'_" ....rr'~~~~rr.t".-. F.' - .- --...---- ". . ~ ~l , \.. ., ,. ., \ a."-r.f:~~;,','.,;",,/',:oJ~'. '~::~.';JX- '.1~:-:r,\:..!~~.~'t,'/LI;/<~~~..~:..'2:i'~":...~. . .... ''''>;?:'-''~:':: ---:--- f' ~ ,). L.AW OF'F'ICES # 5: ~ f!lJ~ &. ~I SUITE: 1000 lees PALM BE"'CH L...KES 80ULEVARC ~ 9~ ggead. sr~ S'S'4tJ/ DRAF[ Y. M...RTIN PP.:R"" .JIL.L. ..., ....."KES,. L....U"II:NCE G. L.EECS A"EA CODE 407 TELEPHONE eae-gaOO TCLE,.AX e/ts'SlSla October 31, 1989 ( Robert Critton, Esq. Slawson, Burman & Critton Suite 300 712 U.S. Highway #1 North Palm Be~ch, FL 33408 RE: Tradewinds Development Corp. vs. City of Boynton Beach Stipulation Regarding Enhancements Your File No. 89-116 Dear Bob: ,~~i Let me start by addressing the -fine issue" in the 1986 case. We are in agreement that both parties will ask the Court to deem the fine to be compensatory as opposed to punitive. Further,' the Court will determine the timing and th~ disposition of the fine. Also, the fine shall be used as a setoff in the 1987 suit, in the event of an adverse judgement. With respect to enhancements, both parties desire to proceed with certain zoning enhancements relating to the PUD and PCD, which are commonly known as the Tradewinds project. It is agreed that these enhancements benefit both parties in the sense that any value which is subsequently assigned to these enhancements shall be used by ,the City as a setoff to any adverse verdict which may be entered against the City of Boynton Beach in the case styled: Tradewinds Development Corporation vs. The City of Boynton Beach, Case Number 87-1638 AI. The enhancements have been identified as follows: 1. The additional 121,000 square feet of commercial retail in the Tradewinds PCD. 2. Increased acreage in the PCD by adding to the PCD acreage of approximately 5.1 +/- acres which is currently locate~ within the southeastern boundary of the PUD. 3. Changing the area Commercial to Local five acres in size alignment of S.WA 8th on the PCD presently designed as Office Retail. This area is approximately and lies westerly of the proposed Street. d...:.,.:i:.n,ji):>,Jl..i.....tD..6::~i;..'~k::.m.:~.'._- .._~ . ~ ~5{: . ~:'.")II!U R~bert D. Critton, Esq. . 'O;tober 31, 1989 Page '2 I DRAFT 4. Changing the PUD to allow for up to 600 multi-xamily units. This eliminates the single xamily units., The 600 unit approval is based upon demonstration that there will be no signi%icant increase in tra~%ic for the PUD. , The parties will agree to enter into a stipulation which provides %or the seto%%s as set %orth above.. Further, Tradewinds represents that the enhancements set xorth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above go hand in hand and do not have separate values apart from each other. In this regard, Tradewinds acknowledges that the value o~ enhancements #1 and #2 combined may range %rom a low 0% $2,420,000.00 to a high ox $3,400,000.00. A determination as to a methodology that will be used to determine a value to be assigned for purposes ox aetoxf is set forth hereafter. Enhancement #1 shall be adopted at the meeting scheduled for October 31, 1989 which is the second reading of Ordinance No. 89-~~~. Enhancement #2 shall be handl.d through the change to the Comprehensive Plan redesignating the reference~ acreage ~rom PUD to PCD, making this ac~eage eligible for rezoning upon submission of applications by'Tradewinds. With regard to the enhancements, referenced as #3 and #4,. Tradewinds acknowledges that these may have substantial value, but the parties have been unable to agree as to a speci~ic value to assign or a range of values to assign, as has been done with regard to enhancements #1 and #2. Enhancement #3 shall be approved through the November 7, 1989 adoption 0% the Comprehensive Plan. Enhancement #4 shall be approved as a result of the Comprehensive Plan adoption, and based upon a demonstration that there will be no significant increase in traffic for the PUD. The ultimate value arranged to be assigned to this enhancement vill be based upon requests made by Tradewinds in the number of units ultimately approved. The parties agree that issue as an admission pending damage action. neither party will use the enhancement of liability against the other in the Absent agreement on a specific number %or setofx as to each enhancement, the parties agree that the values shall be determined by arbitration. The arbitrators shall consist of either three (3) shopping center developers having substantial experience in the acquisition and development of sites xor shopping centers in Palm Beach County, Florida or a combination of such shopping center developers and an MAl appraiser selected !T ~ 9~ &. ~, gr9/ ._....,..',~__~.ii:.o.. ~~'~...,',x ,.~;}"';r.;WP.l"'T.;;'I1 :~~ "l,l. ):.~'iZ?~~~J:::__~~{:~~~~: .... ':~,~::iil.-:'z,., ,t: 'r' ]~ DRAFT ~ ~~bert D. Critton, Esq. botober 31, 1989 . Page 3 'wJ , u;1l'iY ~ \.y.~.)r\. by the shopping center develope~~.' A list of acceptable shopping center developers shall be developed ,between the parties. Each party shall select one developer as his arbitrator. The two developers shall seleot a neutral develo~er or a neu~ral MAIsppraiser and the three arbitrators will hear evidence regarding the value o~ the enhancements. A decision by two o~ the three arbitrators shall be binding upon the parties. The ~ee of the three arbitrators shall be split equally among the parties. It is ~urther agreed that an arms-length sales transaction as to anyone or all of the enhancements shall be considered competent substantial evidence of the value of the enhancement. Final implementation o~ enhancements *3 and *4 will be as a result o~ a subsequent rezoning application. No setoffs for any enhancements will be provided until such time as the enhancements are actually approved by the City Commission of the City o~ Boynton Beach and ,are able to be implemented by Tradewinds t.hrough development permits. In ,t.he event third party litigation threatens theenhancement.s,' then Tradewinds reserves the right to drop any and all enhancements and have the approvals contemplated by the 1986' Stipulation and Settlement Agreement reinstated forthwith, in which event there shall be no setoffs against damages as contemplat.ed herein. In the event that this proposal meets with the approval of a majority of the Cit.y Commission, then we shall require their ~urther authorization and instruction t.o you to sign this letter in t.he manner indicated at the close of t.his letter, confirming the proposal set forth herein. ~ M'I I ___.--1, . F/Martin FMP/bac APPROVED AND pursuant to Commission o~ AGREED TO t.his day of -. '1989 authorizat.ion granted by the Boynt.on Beach Cit.y at a public hearing held on day . 1989. "'. SLAWSON, BURMAN & CRITTON J\.,: r Robert D. Critton, Jr~ Esq. Attorneys ~or the City of Boynton Beach, Florida !F~9~&~~~.PL e e '. ;~i ~/j tj: Supp. No. 35 , APPENDIX A-ZONING Sec.9 ' I I (~<,~" employees. An estimate of the number of employ~~';; ees shall not be required, however, for applica;'~ir tions which are initiated by the city. ': ,~>&, (5) A comparison of traffic which would be ,generated:~f,!: under the proposed zoning or development, with-"'" the traffic that would be generated under the cur.i. ". rent zoning; also, an analysis of traffic rhovements,"! at the intersections of driveways tl:!.at ~ould serve ',>;F the property and surrounding roadways, and im.;',;' provement that would be necessary to, accommo.:;/; date such traffic movements. For proposed devel.;", .. opments which would generate three: thousand',> (3,000) vehicle trips per day or more, or two hun~ dred fifty (250) or more single-directional vehicle trips within a one-hour period, a traffic impact analysis shall be required. Said traffic impact anal- ysis shall include projected trip generation for the development, for all major roadways and intersec- tions within one and one-half (1.5) miles of the subject parcel, as well as traffic that would utilize local streets through residential zoning districts. Said traffic impact analysis shall compare traffic. 1938.1 e -....... - e ":?~ p. .~~". "'. "~r~'~"-.1. APPENDIX A-ZONING Sec. 9 levels between the existing zoning and the pro- posed zoning or development of the subject parcel, and shall take into consideration all development that would be possible under the current zoning within the city, adjacent cities, and within the unincorporated area of Palm Beach County within a radius of five (5) miles. For those parcels lying in the unincorporated area of Palm Beach Coun- ty, which are not currently zoned for urban land uses, the potential land uses according to the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan shall be used. Where said parcels are shown on the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan under residential land use categories, the midpoint of the density range shown on County Comprehensive Plan shall be used. Where a county-wide study of traffic gener- ation at build-out has been adopted or is utilized by Palm Be'ach County, the levels of traffic that are projected by said study shall in all cases be used to project background traffic in the traffic impact analysis submitted by the applicant. The format and standards used in the traffic impact analysis shall be the sam.e as those which are required by Palm Beach County. with the excep- tion of the requirements listed above. Such traffic ih;;'i} i:P:~~ :i~~~:~~o~h~~l t~~~,~;;~:~:~~~:~::~~;:,', with the standards which have. been adopted by or . ~i>~?[:"\ are utilized by Palm Beach County. I ''i;,.<<lS' .,. (6) For parcels larger than one (nacre, a comparison ,''< of the water demand for development ~nder the";; .. proposed zoning or development with water de.",~, mand under the existing zoning. Wate~ den:a!ld(;~; shall be ~stimated using the standards a~opteaby~);t the Palm Beach County Health Department for 'ii,.~ estimating such demand, unless different stand. ~tr ards are justified by a registered engineer; Com-. . :;~f mitment to the provision of improvements to the water system shall also be included, where exist- Supp. No. 26 -- 1938.3 04/04/96 THU 10>06 FAJ 305 448 98).0 eeL cONSULTA~TS INC. 141 001 2355 SALZEDO ST SUITE 202 CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 TEL: (3051448.8955 FAX: (3051 44B.981 0 ~lV\ b ~~ I ~ rg ~ n ~1 :i"~! L CONSULTANTS, INC. J / \ ! L ' , PLANNltJG fNO l . ..__2.lUIH-ijtiJii~l- 81'!9:"~. ~ sum 100 POMPANO BEACH. FLORIDA 33064 TEL: 19541 974-2200 FAX: 18541973-2686 Consulting Engineers Surveyors Pfanners LandsclIlHt Architects Environmental Consuitsnts m 2603 MAITlAND CENTER PARKWAY SUITE C IlAffi.ANO. flORIDA 32751 TEL: !4071 660.2120 fAX: 1407) 875.8308 FA CSIMILE TRANSMISSION DATE: ADril 4. 1996 FROM: Louis R. CamDenile. Jr.. P.E.. P.L.S. TO: Th. Citv of Bovnton Beach A TTN: Ms. Tambri Hevden FAX NUMBER: RE: NUMBER OF PAGES: 3 (INCLUDING COVER) REMARKS: ~.......~.+.+.....4...+....+............+..+...............f....~...........f....................+t....+............................ .~....... NOTICE OF CONFIDENT/AUTY rhi, '",imi,. m., CDn";" il1f'ffMtitHI tlr8t i. prhri-,Id ,l1li anlidlnti.1 ,fId!Dr u,mpt (Mill dinID'u" (I,,*, .pplic.lJl. law. Tbi, tr61161f1i..ioll i, IlItlndld SD/'/Y fo, th. imlividlllll or entity""",. ,IJIWI. If y.u 6r6 not tbtl intBMlBd rw:Jpien Dr (lIB 8IIIplo", I1r "M' IN{JfJMiIJI. for d6lill.rill, it tl1 the IntlllHllId nt:ipllllll. 1DU .h8u1d under$t~nd tlllt Iny distribution. upym, Dr us. of tbe InfDnnatitHI Hnflin.d in this fM:Simil. by Iny.. ot"'r tlllll till duign.tfld 1geipi.nt is untlutiHH1ztld 1Int1 strirt/v 1Jf1JIJibitfld. If you h,vlITfIC8i11ld t!lJ. f/IC,iIllU, in IImr. pl,all immtIdiately natify t/18 "odllr by tlll,ph(Joe. REP! r TO: _X_ COMJ. GABLES flDflPANO 'EACH MAITLAND 04/04/96 THlI 10: 07 FAX 305 448 9810 eeL CONSULTANTS INe. i4l 002 eCl CONSULTANTS, INC. Consuning Engi"..,s m Surveyors Planners 2355 SALZEDO STREET, SUITE 202, CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 . (305) 446.8955 . (305) 448.9810 April 3, 1996 VIA FACSIMILE (407) 375-6357 Ms. Tambri Heyden The City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Woolbriaht Place PUD {l.} ~( -t-- l y,'I\';. <. ^/vG 1'-1" ~. - /6--(,) ~J> . I}~ ~ ~ ~ 4r)i1i~ OoarTambri: ~. p J am in receipt of your April 3, 1996 letter to Mike Morton regarding the above-referenced .:.to $~ i projects. I have spoken to Mr. Morton regarding the requested information and offer the ... J I following: ~ 1...(<' ~ (.i. t I;. Ll' -~ [ 'v, " ,I,;o.~) ~ ' The traffIC analysis (study) is being developed for the PCD and the pue as a whole and will ~C"'v~) '... ,< be submitted upon completion in the very near future. The water and sewer impact analysis ---..., x.1j-J'Y,J!- will not change as far as the alloted ERC's are concerned on the entire pce. Minor changes ) '- \ < to site specific allocations (Le., Racetrac = X, Cracker Barrel = Y) are not felt to be significant 1.~f11 ( since we are not requesting a revision to the total ERC's alloted the PCD. ~ ({ S'l.-I. j nv; th~ r~..-t':I~ of' .fi~' I "\)~ 1.2"i) I--\J~'J.- --tv/\- ; e :ifL.",-, ShoDces of Woolbriaht PCD: RE: CRACKER BARREL and WOOLBRIGHT PLACE PUD Shoppes of Woolbright PCD CCL Project No. 3629 and 3101 The traffic study, as discussed above, will be shortly forthcoming; however, the projects submitted will not significantly alter the traffic impacts that were previously approved for this PUD and for the PCD. The master drainage plan will not change at all from what was submitted and approved during The Vinings at Boynton Beach approval process The buffer plans will not materially differ from those submitted and approved during The Vinings at Boynton Beach approval process. '\ _ _. /' I., I -" V 1,\.<:+.-\rW. s; "'- '-'- "_ ~'-~ ~ -tv ic 2 s Ie. v~ . ~ .(:.-r+L.vY/1{; h' ~ b. 0-- ; ~'S ,-l< , .~ v)- fJ'J,. I (-uij. f e S) T t~ ~ fc~ (.i~5 ~ /a.;: 6.l1.JJ)IL,i!( 04:04/96 THU 10:08 FAX 305 448 9810 eeL CG~S1LTA~T5 I~C. @003 Ms. Tambri Heyden April 3, 19S6 Page Two Cracker Barrel At about 9:00 a.m. this morning, I received a call from someone in your office (I did not take notice of the name) who requested twelve (12) copies of the architectural elevations. This person said that they coulct.l,Js.e.ih.e..!:Luilding floor plans that are in with your Building Department and dld"not need additional copies. I received your letter by fax at about 10:15 a.m. this moming~" have requested that the project architect forward the architectural elevations to you Department, but! would not expect you to receive them bef~~ tomorrow at the earliest. ,. . .. __d""'ir. IJ-..s v f 4{~1 k. iULJ.-ut .-{6y fkj. {J'.>fr (h-u.'h L"--. . ,t"JiftlcJ.- ~ ,. , I would greatly appreciate it if you could verify that the project will receive final approval at ~ cA ~~ the April 23, 1996 Planning and Development Board meeting and will not need to be heard ts .~ before the May 7th City Commission meeting. Mr. Morten has requested that I reiterate his fA\) 'i~. demand that there be no delays of these submittals. 'D- ~\.vO ().--~", hr,.L -,.~ I' Should you have any questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to V ~fr' r L.d k contact me. -1""'. 1 ~ j) lr" r t ~)lr tC Sincerely, if~7ANTS.INC. Louis R. Campanil Vice President LRC/yb cc: Mike Morton, The Morton Group Brett Nein. A.S.L.A., CCl Consultants, Inc. Jim Charo', Boynton Beach City Attorney Carrie Parker, Boynton Beach City Manager CCl CONSULTANTS, INC. LAW O..ICES ~O/: ~7b ~9~ & ~, 9.~ SUITE 1000 1665 PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD Y%a~ ~~ Bteac-'. sr~ SS//tJ/ F'. M....RTIN PERRY ,J1t..t... A. ,JARKESY L.AURENCE G. L.EEOS .__.~~ AREA CODE 407 TELEPHONE 686.9600 TEL.E'-AX eeS-g6lZ October 27, 1989 :; Raymond Rea, Esq. City Attorney City ox Boynton Beach P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach; F~orida 33425 R.... .... . Tradewinda/Amended App~ication Our File No. 780.14 RECEIVED ocr 30 1.989 CITY ATTORNEY Dear Raymond: io. As per our discussion of October 28~ 1989, I am enclosing the analysis of oxx-site traffic improvements xor xhe Tradewinds project. The analysis is based on a project development ox 320,000 square feet of retail, 600 dwe~ling units of multi- iamily, and a 1,200 seat/SOD student church. This traffic analysis anticipates maximum development of the site, including enhancements, and m~tigates the impact accordingly. Please note actu:l buildout of the project may be less. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~'?ua~ t ~A--' Laurence Leeds LGL/bac Enclosure .---- Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 2627 N.E. 203rd Street (Ives Dairy Road), Suite 207 Miami, Florida 33180 USA Phone: (305) 935-0410 Fax: (305) 931-1097 October 23, 1989 lfV7 1f3~~ yl't1 Mr. David I.evy Tradewi.OOs Gralp O:>r:gress O:>rp:>rate Plaza 902 Clint Moo:re Road, SUite 124 Boca Raton, Florida 33487 Fe: Woolbright R1DjBoynt:on Beach 1703.09.01 D::!ar David: ;If As requested, we have expaIXled wr Blase II link analysis to include the AM arrl IM peak ban: periods for ead1. intersectiCl'l ac1:h:essed in the z.l1rray- nx3eck 6: Associates reports of 1986. '1hese intersections inc1tXle: Woolbright Road & Cax]l:ess Avenue Woolbright Road & SW 8th street Woolbright Road & I -95 Di.anx:n:l SOlthbalrrl ranps Woolbright Road & I -95 Diarocnl nortllboorrl ranps Woolbright Road & Seacrest BcW.evard A l1UIIber of factors were inc11.Xled in the OCl'!p.ltatiCl'l whid1. differ fran the 1986 analyses am should be noted. '!he IOOdificatioos to the analyses are a result of i..ncx.>rporati..riJ the requ:i.reuents am methodologies set forth in the Traffic Performance starrla.tds Ordinance (TPS) 87-18 of Palm Bead1 cnmty. 'lhese TPS st:.arrlards were also the basis for the Blase II link analysis forwa...""ded to ya1 in meno form on Septeti:)er 26, 1989. '!he backgl:ourrl con:litians arrl asc:l1llptions for these i.nt:ersecti.CI'l analyses are therefore consis'-...ent with the Blase II link analysis. Included are the followin:J factors and assunptions. 1. Existi.rg traffic voluzres are based at 1988 off-peak season, peak halr corxlitians. 2. Project hti.1<b.tt was estimated at 1992. 3. Backgl:ourrl grQWth on Woolbright Road fran 1988 to 1992 was projected at 4% per year east of I-95 ani 6% per year 'WeSt of I- 95. ''-..., ~ I ~ ~:' ~ ~ .. .' ~. i f i I j , . i ,. ,.. I ; aarton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Mr. David Ievy October 23, 1989 Page 'lWo 4. Off-peak season counts were . i.Jc:eased by 20% to project peak season cxn:titions. 5. '!he Palm Beam camty Traffic En:Ji.neeri.rq staff anticipated a 5,000 veh/day diversion arl:o Woolbright Road fran Boynton Beach Ballevam after the extensioo of Woolbright Road to Military Trail. Seventy five (75) percent of this diversioo will occur between eong.!t::$S am I-95. '1hi.s will ad:} 337 vehicles (9%) durin:] the IM peak ha.1r and 300 vehicles (86) clurinJ the AM peak halr. + . 6. Builda1t by 1992 was asc:luned for the Boynton O::mneroe Center, Pylon Interstate am M-1" tracts with the pat:enti.al. c1eve1cpnent as identified in Table 1 of the M.u:ray~ & Assooiates report, 1986. 7. Major projects which nust be oonsiderOO based on the TPS were identified with the assistance of Palm Beach County Planni..rq Deparbnent. '!bey consist of: Parlcwa1k Rai..nlnrI lakes Intian Sprin:js Pipers Glenn Cambridge PazX 1250 D.U. 1020 D.U. 950 D.U. 1700 D.U. 450 D.U. 8. All projects ~ by the City of Boynton Beach since 1986 were identified arxl reviewed with the City staff. }b;t major projects which ~d iJrpact Woolbright Road are either b.1i.1t or fall ~l belCM the TPS threshold for inc1usicn. '!he i.Irpact:s are therefore inc1u:1ed within the backgr'a.lnl glXMth rates. 9. Project c1eve1cpnent was based an 320,000 SF of retail, 600 LU nulti-family, and a 1200 seatjSOO student d1u1:d1. . . Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. ,. Mr. David levy Octd::er 23,1989 Page 'Ihree ( 10. Intersection capacity analyses were prepar~ using the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual, SI>eCial Report 209, Transportation Research Boanl, C1apter 6, Signalized Int.ersect:ia1s. SPMMARY ag ~ m ATTAIN LEVEL OP a.raw~C8 D . A. Woolbright Road based on Daily P.rojecticns r~~ , ~. P:roiect % of Total Trioo 13.1% 19.9% 7.2% I I I ! I I I r- r I I Secmlent I-95 to SW 8th street SW 8th Sb:eet to ~-=- Cc>ngress to Military TraU 6 I.anes 6 lanes 4 lanes B. Intersections 1992 Peak Seascn 1. WoolbriQht Road & Con:rress Avenue AM-[) IM-D We.stl:looOO/5 lanes Add seocn:1 left tum lane Add right tum lane Project traffic = 7.5% of Total AM 9.6% of Total IM 2 - Woolbright Road & SW 8th street F.ast:l:>amV 4 lanes Add thinl tlu:ough-right lane AM-C IM-D " . 0> Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Mr. David I2.vy October 23, 1989 Page Fa.rr ~ West:bc:md/ 4 lanes 1d:1 third through-right lane Nort:hbam:V3 lanes . Add right tm:n lane Sout:hl:>oomI3 lanes O:xlsb:uct left, left~, right tm:n lane Project traffic =. 14.1% of Total AM 17.0% of Total HI 3. Woolbricmt Road & 1-95 ~ raIl1)S AM-C tM-C F.astl:Joorx3/3 lanes Add right tum lane to 1-95 sout:hl:x:A:uxi West:bc:md/3 lanes Add through lane as auxilimy lane fran 1-95 sout:hboon:l ranp right tm:n. (maintain 2 lanes through per direct:i.al on brid:Je) Project traffic = 5.0% of total AM 7.3% of Total 1M 4. Woolbricmt Road & r -95 Nort:hl:xx.n'rl ~ F.astl:Joorx3/ 4 lanes Mi secarl left turn lane alto 1-95 northl:nm:i AM-<= R-t-D Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Mr. David IEvy October 23, 1989 Page Five NortJ.1bolm:l. On-Ranp Adl ~ane to widen entrance for dual left Project traffic = 5.0% of Total AM 5.9% of Total m 5. Woolbricmt Road & Seacrest Boulevanl AM-C m-p .... F.ast:hamd,/4 lanes Adl right tum lane (See (lj~~i.a1) NortJ.1bolm:l Re-stripe ~d1 lanes to provide left, left-through, ~right Project traffic = 4.8% of Total AM 5.9% of Total 1M DISCOSSION '!he levels of sexvioe l:epol:ted am :related inprovements ~ nulti~ signal operaticn with CCIl1binations of p:rot:ect:ed am permissive left turns, as well as split J;t1ases. 'IWo of the inprovenent:s listed may not be practical due to existing constraints. ~ seoom left turn lane for the northbourxl 1-95 rall1? rrevement (Int. #4) wcW.d recnW:e wi.denin:J of the bri&Je CNer 1-95. '!he projected 975 vehicles making this movement during the FM peak haIr resulted nostly fran bac:kgrounj growth am seasonal adjustJnents. Project traffic "'- fran the Woolbright roo totals 34 vehicles mak.i.rg this m:::wem;mt, lOOStly residential ~ trips, which ex>nsti.tutes 3.5% of the total left turn. earton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Mr. Iavid levy October 23, 1989 Page six A partial cloverleaf ranp is not feasible due to develcpne.nt alon.:J the east side of the existing ranp. At Woolbright Road arxl Seacrest BcW.evam, a right tum lane is reo .'.\o€'l ded an the east:ba.1rd awroach (Int. '5). 'lhis right tm:n lane t<<W.d require the taki.rg of cemet:eJ:y pl:'q)erty. 'Ibis i.ntersectian waUd f\Jrx:ti.cn at level of sel:Vice E durin:] the 1M peak boor in peak F".€'aBal. . DlrirxJ the off-peak seascrt, it can functim at IOS-D. Arw significant ilrproveuent of this iIr~on, J:JeyoOO the stripin:] ani IilasinJ dlan:Jes recxmnerxied, will require widen.i.rg alon;r the cemet:eJ:y frart:age. If YOJ have any questions, or need further' clarification, please call. SiIDe..?"E!1y I PMID.:N-ASaiMAN ASSOCIATES, me. '- 0::::: John Zegeer Joel Wantman AGjbk: tradewirds Barton-Aschman Associates,lnc. 2627 N.E. 203rd Street (Ives Dairy Road), Suite 207 Miami, Florida 33180 USA Phone: (305) 935-0410 Fax: (305) 931-1097 MEM::>RANIlJM 'IO: Iavid levy FRCM: An1re Groenhoff Dt\.TE October 23, 1989 SUB.JECI' : Woolbright roo Off-site Traffic Ilrprovements Con::li tian: - Palm Beach cnmty TPS starrlards #87-18 1992 Peak Seasa1 - Project Larrl-Use; 320,000 sf Retail, 600 nI1l.ti- family D.U., C1nm:il/Sd1oo1 Woolbriaht Road Iaily projections for 1992 require Woolbright Road to be widened to meet I.C6-D starrlanls. "'" SeQIrent lanes Proiect % of Total TripS 1-95 to SW 8th street SW 8th st...~t to Col"XjreSS Avenue 6 6 13.1% 19.9% AGjbk: offsite " ~ ~ Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 2627 N.E. 203rd Street (Ives Dairy Road), Suite 207 Miami, Florida 33180 USA Phone: (305) 935-0410 Fax: (305) 931-1097 FRCM: IBvid tiNy Arrlre Gl:oenhoff MEM:>RANI:UM '10: OI\TE Qctd:)er 23, 1989 Woolbright roo Off-site Traffic Inprovements ; SUBJECl': Carrlition : - Palm Beadl Camty TPS st:amards #87-18 - 1992 Peak Season Project I.arx:l-Use; 320,000 sf Retai.1, 600 M.1lti- family D.U., Olurc:b/School WOOlbright Road ani Seacrest Ba1levard East:J:xJurXV 4 Ianes 1d:i right tum lane North1:x:ul:l Intersection: Inprovements: . ;: ~ Re-st:ripe awroac:h lanes to provide left, left-thrcugh, tl1rco;)h-right Project lirpacts: 4.8% of total AM intersectial volume 5.9% of total IM intersecti.al volume Inproverl Level of Service: AM-C IM-D '!he right turn lane will require the tak.in;J of CE!letery prcperty. Withart: this lane, the intersection would functi.cn at level of service E duri.rg the 1M peak haIr in peak ~ascn. IUr.i.rg the off-peak season, it can functicm at I..QS-D. Arr.i significant iIrprovement of tlrls intersection beyond the stripinJ ani ~in:.J dlan:Jes reoc:rmnen:led, will require wideni.n:.J alcnJ the cemetery frontage. 'The levels of service reported require nulti-y;hase signal ~tion am north/so.rt:h split p,ases. AGjbk: levy ~ 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT **********~*****.*******.**********..**.***************.**..*************. INTERSECTION..WOOLBRIGHT ROAD/SEACREST AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST.......ANDRE GROENHOFF DATE. ...... ...10/18/89 TIME..........AM PEAK 1992 COMMENT.......ALTERNATIVE 2 PEAK SEASON 1992 ------------------~------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB we NB SB LT 125 1 1 1 387 157 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 689 608 335 324 T 12.0 T 12.0 LT 12.0 T 12.0 RT 429 45 147 141 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 100 40 60 60 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PI<G BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE ( i. ) ( ~ ) Y/N NI'I Nb Y/N /lItn T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 :4 0.95 . 25 N 20.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 ' 25 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 25 N 23.5 3 S8 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 25 N 23.5 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- !'" SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH ... 90.0 ~ PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X N8 LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PO PO 1,.18 LT X X 58 LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PO PO GREEN 4.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 27.0 17.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.073 0.411 12.2 8 16.9 C T 0.586 0.333 16.5 C R 0.698 0.333 19.3 C WB L 0.073 0.411 12.2 8 14.0 B TR 0.526 0.333 16.0 C " NB L 0.398 0.300 19.2 C 19.1 C TR 0.837 0.300 25.7 0 ; SB L 0.496 0.189 25.8 D 21.0 C TR 0.632 0.189 22.9 C --------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = . 17.6 (sec/veh) V/C = 1.792 LOS ... C 1985 HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION. .WOOLBRIGHT ROAD/SEACREST AREA TYPE... ..OTHER ANALYST... .~..ANDRE GROENHOFF DATE.. ...... ..10/18/89 Tl ME. . . . . . . . . . PM PEAK 1 992 COMMENT.... ...ALTERNATIVE 2 PEAK SEASON 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY ES WB NB SB EB "'IS NB SB LT 247 146 673 145 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 886 930 824 427 T 12.0 T 12.0 LT 12.0 T 12.0 RT 464 144 132 173 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 100 60 60 60 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE ( Yo ) ( Yo ) Y/N Nf'l Nb Y/N f'lin T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 ' 25 N 20.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 25 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 25 N 23.5 3 S8 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 25 N 23.5 3 ,. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PH-1 E8 LT X TH RT PO WB LT X TH RT PO GREEN 4.0 YELLOW 3.0 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH '" 90.0 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 X NB LT X X TH X X RT X PO X SB LT X X TH X X RT X PO 30.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 27.0 17.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 1 .088 0.411 114.5 F 35.0 D T 0.754 0.333 18.8 C R 0.741 0.333 20.5 C WB L 0.073 0.411 12.2 B 17.7 C TR 0.881 0.333 23.0 C NB L 1.071 0.300 77.3 F 41.8 E LTR 0.999 0.300 38.0 0 " , S8 L 0.458 0.189 25.4 0 23.1 C TR 0.844 0.189 28.5 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 29.4 (sec/veh) V/C = 1 .880 LOS = D ------ Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 2627 N.E. 203rd Street (Ives Dairy Road), Suite 207 Miami, Florida 33180 USA Phone: (305) 935-0410 Fax: (305) 931-1097 MEMJRANIXJM '10: David levy F'RCM: Arrlre Groenhoff Dt\TE October 23, 1989 Woolbright IUD Off-site Traffic Inprovements SUBJECI' : Corrlition: - Palm Beadl Camty TPS stan1ards #87-18 - 1992 Peak Season - Project Iarrl-Use: 320,000 sf Retail, 600 l-fillti- family D. U., Chu:rch/Sdlool Intersection: Woolbright Road am SW 8th street Irrprovements : East:bol.1nV 4 Lanes Add a third through-right tum lane Westbourrl/ 4 lanes Add a third through-right tum lane No:rthbourxV3 lanes Add a right-tum lane .' ~. Sa.rt:hbcxm:V3 lanes Project IIrpacts: Constn.lct: left, left-through, am right-turn lane 14.1% of total AM intersection volume 17.0% of total fM intersection volume Inproved I.evel of Sel:vice: AM-<: IM-D '!he levels of service reported am related inprovements require multi-FOase signal operations. AGjbk:dlevy " ~ 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..WOOLBRIGHT ROADISW 8TH STREET AREA TYPE. ....OTHER ANALYST... ....ANDRE GROENHOFF DATE.. ........10/18/89 TI ME. . . . . . . . . . AM PEAK 1992 COMMENT.......WORSE CASE ALT LAND USE 2 PEAK SEASON -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB sa LT 252 416 97 152 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 1663 914 10 27 T 12.0 T 12.0 LT 12.0 LT 12.0 RT 388 216 109 215 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 RR 80 80 60 80 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -----------------------------------------~-------------------------------- , ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE ( % ) ( 7. ) YIN N!"I Nb Y/N !"Iin T EB 0.Q0 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 20 N 20.5 3 wa 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 20 N 20.5 :3 ~!::l 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 26.5 3 'oJ . S8 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 26.5 3 ... -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PO PO '..is LT X X SB LT X TH X TH )( RT X RT X PO PO GREEN 16.0 36.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 10.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C GIC DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS [8 L 0.396 0.611 7.2 B 22.1 C TR 0.958 0.400 24.0 e .. WB L 0.961 0.611 39.4 0 20.71 C TR 0.508 0.400 13.3 B r~8 L 0.313 0. 11 1 28.3 0 25.5 D LT 0.259 0. 111 23.8 C R 0.295 0.1.11 24.0 C se L 0.306 0.178 24.6 C 18.7 C LT 0.290 0.178 20.8 e R 0.254 0.356 13.3 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------- = ::TERSECTI ON: Delay = 21.5 (sec/veh) vIe = 0.790 LOS = C :- ...... 1985 HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..WOOLBRIGHT ROAD/SW 8TH STREET AREA TYPE... ..OTHER ANALYST.. .....ANDRE GROENHOFF DATE... .......10/10/89 TIME..........PM PSH 1992 COMMENT... ....WORSE CASE ALT LAND USE 2 PEAK SEASON -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 371 218 564 263 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 9S8 1933 48 18 T 12.0 T 12.0 LT 12.0 LT 12.0 RT 192 319 643 351 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 RR 80 80 25Ql 230 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PEO. BUT. ARR. TYPE ( i. ) ( % ) YIN NI"l Nb V/N I"lin T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 20 N 20.5 3 ~l WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 20 N 20.5 3 (, Ii'. NS 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 26.5 3 S8 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.95 20 N 26.5 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- :""*r,_ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PO PO WB LT X X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PO PO GREEN 11 .0 38.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 21.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. VIC GIC DELAY LOS APP. OELAY APP. LOS E8 L 1 .132 0.578 110.9 F 37.7 0 "'-... TR 0.489 0.422 12.3 B W8 L 0.416 0.578 8.6 B 26.0 0 TR 0.993 0.422 27.7 0 ~J8 L 0.866 0.233 37.3 D 55.4 E LT 0.692 0.233 23.2 C R 1 .124 0.233 93.3 F S8 L 1.060 0.089 107.9 F 61.2 F LT 0.820 0.089 4t.8 E R 0.383 0.211 20.0 C -------------------------------------------------------------------------- IrJTERSECTION: Delay = 37.6 (sec/veh) VIC = 1.057 LOS == D . Barton.Aschman Associates, Inc. 2627 N.E. 203rd Street (!ves Dairy Road), Suite 207 Miami. Florida 33180 USA MEM)RANI:lJM ':ro: F'R!'::M : Il2\TE ~: Con:lition: Intersection: Inprovements: ~. Note: Project Inpacts: Phone: (305) 935-0410 Fax: (305) 931-1097 D:lvid levy Arrlre Groenhoff 0ct.dJer 23, 1989 Woolbright roo Off-site Traffic Inprovements ~ - Palm Beam Camty TPS starx3ards #87-18 - 1992 Peak Season - Project Iarxi-Use; 320,000 sf Retail, 600 Multi- family D.U., Churd1jSdlool Woolbright Road am I -95 Sout:hbourxi Ranp:; East:l:xxJrxV3 lanes (west of I -95) Add right turn auxiliary lane to I-95 south ranp West:bcA.n'rl/3 lanes (west of I-95) Add through lane as auxiliary lane fran I -95 south off-ranp right turn Maintain 2 through lanes per direction CNer I -95_ 5.0% of total AM intersection volume 7.3% of total IM intersection volume Inproved revel of Service: AM-C IM-C '!he levels of service reported am related inprovements require Im.1lti-phase signal operations. AGjbk: davlevy [6J ~ 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..WOOLBRIGHT ROAD/I-95 S8 RAMPS AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST... ... .AG DATE. ...... ...10/18/89 TIME..........AM PEAK 1992 COMMENT... ....ALTERNATIVE 2 LAND USE PEAK SEASON -----------.--------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 0 568 0 701 T 12.0 L 12.0 12.0 L 12.0 TH 1125 892 0 0 T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 L 12.0 RT 621 0 0 726 R 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 RR 100 0 0 100 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE ( i. ) ( 7. ) Y/N NPI Nb Y/N Pltn T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 '4 0.95 ' 0 N 11.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 0 N 11.5 3 NB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 1.00 0 N 20.5 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 0 N 20.5 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- (' SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 ~ PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 E8 LT NB LT TH X TH RT X RT PO PO WB LT X SB LT X TH X X TH RT RT X PO PO GREEN 31.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. VIC GIC DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB T 0.957 0.333 29.2 0 24.4 C R 0.636 0.556 9.8 B WS L 0.984 0.344 46.7 E 22.0 C T 0.359 0.711 3.3 A S8 L 0.972 0.222 45.7 E 26.2 0 '. R 0.455 0.933 0.4 A ~ '. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 24.7 (sec/veh) VIC = 1.203 LOS :z C 1985 HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT +*++.*~+*+**************************************************************** INTERSECTION..WQOLBRIGHT ROAD/I-95 SB RAMPS AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANAL YST . . . . . . . AG DATE. . . . . . . . . .10/18/89 TIME...... .:..PM PEAK 1992 COMMENT..... ..ALTERNATIVE 2 LAND USE PEAK SEASON -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB S8 LT 0 348 0 756 T 12.0 L 12.0 12.0 L 12.0 TH 1358 1548 0 0 T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 L 12.0 RT 534 0 0 904 R 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 RR 100 0 0 100 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE ( 7. ) O~ ) YIN NI'1 Nb Y/N Plin T E8 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 ; 0 N 14.3 3 '10 0.00 2.00 N 0 ,._4 0.95 ' 0 N 14.3 3 W...l riB 0.00 0.00 N 0 0 1.00 0 N 25.8 3 58 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 0 N 25.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 " PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 (' EB LT NB LT TH X TH RT X RT PO PO j ,~ LT X SB LT X w~ TH X X TH RT RT X PO PO GREEN 20.0 38.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 23.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB T 0.950 0.422 24.5 C 21.2 C R 0.452 0.678 4.5 A W8 L 0.974 0.222 55.7 E 17.5 C T 0.680 0.678 6. t B 58 L 0.950 0.256 39.6 0 23.0 C R 0.609 0.933 0.8 A .~ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 21.7 (sec/veh) V/C = 1.317 LOS = C / .. ./ 'Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 2627 N.E. 203rd Street (Ives Dairy Road), Suite 207 Miami, Florida 33180 USA Phone: (305) 935-0410 Fax: (305) 931-1097 FRCM: David Isvy An::1re Groenhoff MEMJRANIXJM 'TO: DA.TE October 23, 1989 " SUBJECl' : Woolbright roo Off-Site Traffic Inprovements Con:lition: - Palm Bead1 cnmty TPS st:an:3ards #87-18 - 1992 Peak Season - Project Iarxi-Use; 320,000 sf Retail, 600 1Illlti- family D.U., Olurdl/Sdlool Intersection: Woolbright Rocid am. Con:itess Avenue IIrprovements : West:b:xnxV5 I.anes . . Project Inlpacts: - Add a seoorn left turn lane - Add a right 'bJ.m lane 7.5% of total AM intersection volume 9.6% of total :EM intersection volume Inproved level of Service: AM-<t p 1*-D 'Ihe levels of service reported am related inprovements requLre Il1llti-{ilase signal cperation. AGjbk: intersection " [6] 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT **********.**.*****.****************************************************** INTERSECTION..WOOLBRIGHT RD/CONGRESS AVE AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST.. .....ANDRE GROENHOFF DATE.. ........10/18/89 TIME..........AM PEAK 1992 COMMENT.... ...ALTERNATE LAND USE 2 PEAK SEASON 1992 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLU~IES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB W8 NB S8 LT 265 535 46 710 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 808 394 357 618 T 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 RT 85 252 496 195 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 40 200 200 60 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 lR 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG 8USES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (% ) (% ) Y/N NI"\ Nb Y/N I"\in T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 25 N 32.5 3 WS 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 ' 25 N 32.5 3 ~'O 0.00 2.00 N 0 :4 0.95 25 N 26.5 3 <u S8 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 25 N 26.5 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 , Ea LT X NB LT X ~ TH X TH X RT X RT X PO PO WS LT X S8 LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PO PO GREEN 15.0 24.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 18.0 21.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. vie GIC DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS E8 L 0.949 0.167 56.6 E 35.7 0 TR 0.922 0.267 29.2 0 W8 L 0.989 0.167 54.9 E 37.9 0 T 0.419 0.267 17.7 C R 0.131 0.267 16.2 C NB L 0.071 0.200 22.2 C 19.1 C TR 0.569 0.233 20.1 C '\ S8 L 1.094 0.200 86.0 F 49.6' E TR 0.630 0.233 20.6 C -------------------------------------------------------------------------- WTU{SECTION: Delay = 37.0 (sec/veh) VIC = 1.029 LOS c 0 "_11 -~.. ---- -- .-. ....- 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..WOOLBRIGHT RD/CONGRESS AVE AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST.. .....ANDRE GROENHOFF DATE. .........10/18/89 TIME.. ....... .PM PEAK 1992 COMMENT.. ... ..ALTERNATE LAND USE 2 PEAK SEASON 1992 -------------------------------------------------------------------~------ VOLUMES GEOMETRY E8 WB NB SB E8 WB NB 5B LT 211 645 85 538 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 548 928 703 667 T 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 RT 70 585 688 261 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 40 200 200 60 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PEO. BUT. ARR. TYPE ( ~~ ) ( % ) Y/N NM Nb Y/N I'lin T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 ,", 4 0.95 25 N 32.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0. 95' 25 N 32.5 3 N8 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 25 N 26.5 "7 .;J 5B 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 25 N 26.5 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- (; SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 Iir'" PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-t PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X Tn x TH X RT X RT X PO PO WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PO PO GREEN 17.0 24.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 14.0 23.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. VIC GIC DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS E8 L 0.667 0. 189 29.2 0 22. t C TR 0.625 0.267 19.5 C WS L 1.052 0.189 70.7 F 50.0 E T 0.987 0.267 37.5 0 R 0.978 0.267 45.5 E ""'- NB L 0.168 0.156 25.1 0 26.'1 0 TR 0.942 0.256 29.5 0 ; 58 L 1.066 0.156 79.7 F 40.8 E TR 0.668 0.256 20.2 C -----~------------------------~------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 37.2 (sec/veh) vIe = 1 .027 LOS = 0 ~- . Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 2627 N.E. 203rd Street (Ives Dairy Road), Suite 207 Miami, Florida 33180 USA Phone: (305) 935-0410 Fax: (305) 931-1097 FR:M: ravid I.evy Arrlre Groenhoff MEM:>RANJ:UM '10: rwrE October 23, 1989 ~ ~: Woolbright RID Off-site Traffic Inprovements Corrlition: - Palm Beadl COOnty TPS st:arrla:rds 4#87-18 - 1992 Peak Season - Project I..arrl-Use; 320,000 sf Retail, 600 Multi- family O.U., Churdl/Sdlool Woolbright Road am I -9~ Northbourxl Ranps Intersection: Inprovements : .;".. Ea.st.bam:3/3 Lanes Add se.corrl left turn lane onto I -95 northbourxl._ 1". Ii> Northbourxl On-Ranp Add lane to widen entrance for dual left Project Impacts: 5.0% of total AM intersection volume 5.9% of total IH i.nt:ersection volume Inproved Level of Service: AM-C IM-O 'n1e se.corx:l left turn lane for the oorthbourxl I -95 ranp novement will require wideni.rq of the bridge over I-95 or ranp relocation (east). '!he projected 975 vehicles mak.in:J this novement durinJ the IN peak hoor l:eSUlted IOClStly fran backgroorrl grc:Mth am seasonal adjusbnents. Project traffic fran the Woolbright RID totals 34 vehicles II1aki.rq this novarent, lOClStly residential c:ut.bourxl trips, which CXXlStitutes 3.5% of the total left turn. A partial cloverleaf ranp is not feasible due to develcpnent alorq the exist.i.rq ranp. " AGjbk: david ~ 'f~ /1' 1 1985 HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT *****~******************************************************************** INTERSECTION..WOOLBRIGHT/I-95 NB RAMPS AREA TYPE.....QTHER ANALYST. ......ANDRE GROENHOFF DATE.. .....;..10/18/89 TIME. . . . . . . . . . AM PEAK 1992 COMMENT.......ALTERNATE 2 PEAK SEASON -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB we NB SB LT 746 0 417 13 L 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.13 12.13 TH 1159 989 13 13 L 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 12.13 RT 0 602 257 13 T 12.0 R 12.13 R 12.13 12.13 RR 13 100 100 13 T 12.0 12.0 12.13 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.13 12.0 12.13 12.13 12.13 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PEO. BUT. ARR. TYPE (% ) ( 7. ) Y/N NM Nb Y IrJ P1in T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 A 13 . 95 ~ 13 N 14.3 3 WB 0.00 2.013 N 13 4 13.95 13 N 14.3 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 13 N 28.8 3 58 0.013 13.00 N 0 0 13.95 13 N 28.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 ... PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X X TH RT RT X PO PO we LT SB LT TH X TH RT X RT PO PO GREEN 26.0 34.0 13.0 0.0 GREEN 21.0 0.0 0.13 0.13 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 13.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.13 0.0 13.0 13.13 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 13.829 0.289 27.1 D 16.1 C T 13.493 13.700 4.1 A we T 0.773 0.378 17.6 C 18.13 C R 0.580 13.611 7.4 B NB L 0.574 13.233 24.13 C 25.3 0 '''"' R 13.119 0.933 0.1 A 't -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 20.4 (sec/veh) vie.. 13.739 LOS = C --1. --~~L ~aJlr'--~ ----- _"'-....::ti.........~......, ~_.-~,Ilof..u....~--_.W 1985 HeM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..WQOLBRIGHT/I-95 NB RAMPS AREA TYPE. ....OTHER ANALYST... ."..ANDRE GROENHOFF DATE.. ...... ..10/18/89 TI ME. . . . . . . . . . PM PEAK 1992 COMMENT..... ..ALTERNATE 2 PEAK SEASON -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY E8 WB NB 58 EB W8 N8 SB LT 975 0 742 0 L 12.0 T 12.0 L \2.0 12.0 TH 1135 1090 0 0 L 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 12.0 RT 0 1080 652 0 T 12.0 R 12.0 R \2.0 12.0 RR 0 100 100 0 T 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ------------~-------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE ( i~ ) ( 1. ) Y/N N!"I Nb Y/N !"Iin T EB {'l. ~" 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 ' 0 N 14.3 3 4 0.95 , 0 N 14.3 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 0 N 28.8 3 58 0.00 2.00 N 0 4 0.95 0 N 28.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH ... 90.0 PH-\ PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 ~8 LT X N8 LT X TH X X TH RT RT X PO PO 1...:8 LT 58 LT TH X TH RT X RT PO PO GREEN 28.0 32.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 21.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. VIC GIC DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.966 0.311 37.9 0 2\.3 C T 0.463 0.700 4.0 A W8 T 0.869 0.356 21.4 C 44.7 E R 1.129 0.589 74.4 F rm L 0.980 0.233 46.3 E 27.8 D R 0.401 0.933 0.3 A ., -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 29.1 (sec/veh) vie = 1 .093 LOS = D ,~.,- ..J;,', " ,,;,........ti.M.1.:..o...6".'...:.L...~~;..iLLl:;:!'~......:'_ ,'fat.',., ".~ .'.r!.....;J_ ":":":._'~_:::"':.-;'_;..,~~.,".;JO:;:;..c.':'':'''':,','''.'!.1:XLL:;:~.';':;'~l'' <",",' ....,A<':......,. I MEMORANDUM December 14, 1989 TO: Mayor and City Commission FROM: Timothy Cannon, Interim Planning Director ~. THROUGH: Sharon Randolph, Interim City Manager RE: Road Improvements for Woolbright Place PCD (Increased Floor Area) The following memorandum addresses the road improvements which are to be required in conjunction with the increased floor area for the Woolbright Place Planned Commercial Development (PCD). Ordinance 89-39, which was adopted at the October 31, 1989 City Commission meeting, approved the PCD. This ordinance included a provision that ".. .the applicant shall be permitted to construct an additional 121,000 square feet of commercial building area over and above that permitted by the aforementioned Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (see Section 4 of attached Ordinance 89-39). Seciion 4 of this ordinance also specified that "This additional square footage of commercial development shall require off-site traffic improvements identified in the October 23, 1989 Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., traffic report, attached hereto and incorporated herein, sUbject to final approval or modification of said reports' findings by the City Commission on November 7, 1989. The applicant, Tradewinds Development, Inc. has consented to changing the November 7, 1989 date in order to allow the City staff to evaluate the Barton-Aschman traffic report and formulate a recommendation to the City Commission. This delay was necessary because the Barton-Aschman report was submitted on October 30, 1989--the day before the adoption of Ordinance 89-39, and because the Barton-Aschamn report is not 'sufficient with respect to detailing the assumptions and methodology to allow the report to be evaluated in and by itself. The Barton-Aschman report evaluated the entire project, meaning the PUD and PCD combined, including the enhancements which. were the subject of an agreement between Tradewinds and the City (see attached letter from F. Martin Perry, dated October 31, 1989). The project was reviewed in accordance with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance which is. currently in effect in the unincorporated area of Palm Beach County, except that Level of Service (LOS) "D" was used rather than the LOS "C" which is currently speCified in the Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. The improvements which would be required in order to maintain LOS liD" according to Barton-Aschman, are listed under Column 2 in the table which is contained in the attached report prepared by Walter H. Keller Jr, Inc. walter Keller also evaluated the entire project, including the enhancements, using the same standards as Barton-Aschman, a~ carne up with a somewhat different list of road improvements, which are shown in Column 3. The improvements which were required as a part of the 1986 settlement stipulation , are listed in Column 1. Therefore, if the applicant limited the project to the mix and intensity of uses specified in the 1986 settlement stipulation, only those road improvements listed under Column 1 would be required. In view of the fact that the road improvements for the uses specified in' the 1986 settlement stipulation have alrady been specified, the applicant would be required to mitigate only tMe additional traffic created by the enhancements, in accordance with the code requirements which were in effect at the date that the enhancements were approved (October 31, 1989). Section 9.C.4.h.(5) of Appendix A--Zoning of the City's Code of Ordinances states that, when property is rezoned, a traffic impact analysis must be submitted. This section states specifically that "The format and analysis shall be the same as those which are required by Palm Beach County, with the exception of the requirements listed above. Such traffic impact analysis shall include recommendations for the mitigation of traffic impacts, consistent with the standards which have been adopted or are utilized by Palm Beach County. II (a copy of Section 9.C.4.h.(5) is attached). Therefore, the enhancements have been evaluated by Walter Keller with respect to the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. Column 4 shows the road improvements which would be required in accordance with the Trffic Performance standards Ordinance, in order to maintain Level of Service "C". It is the planning Department's recommendation that road improvements for the additional commercial square footage include, at a minimum, the improvements listed in column 4. These improvements consist of the following: (1) 6-laning of Woolbright Road from Congress Avenue to Interstate 95 (2 additional lanes); (2) The widening the Woolbright Road overpass at Interstate 95 to allow for an additional eastbound through land and westbound through lane; and (3) The addition of second eastbound right turn land at the I-95/Woolbright Road interchange. The additional improvements listed in the Barton-Aschman report would be desirable, from the standpoint of traffic safety and efficiency, but would not be required by the Code of Ordinance requirements which were in effect on October 31, 1989. The road improvements which are to be required for the Woolbright Place PCD will need to be bonded as a condition of the. approval of the final plat. Costs estimates and a timetable for their completion would need to be submitted with the preliminary plat. The total package of road improvements that would need to be bonded would consist of the road improvements which were required by the 1986 court settlement, plus the road improvements which are required in accordance with Section 4 of Ordinance 89-39. Timothy P, Cannnon .... " ~"?,l;' .I,:.fr!-:r. "..,.;,r'" . ({g d ) "T\.'. u. J!iJ ~) ,\\ <.. '.. . '-.;'.,,-q+'....;z~,.~:tW".lW.M:"~::::::5:!~:::.:'!'~!.-:~.: :.;~~/'~.4.&C,Qt,;(!.1I\.... .. , , xhibi t "E". ":\" l;' ~ I I I II I 1 ,I II I I I I I I I , ORDINANCE NO. 89-39 , . , AN ORDINAtlCE OF THE CI'l'Y COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEl\CH. FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO, 80-19 OF SAID CITY PURSUANT TO AN ORDER OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIF'rEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT BY REZONING SEVERAL PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA. FROM R-1A (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL), R-3 (MULTIPLE-FAMILY DWELLING) AND C-2 (NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL) TO PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT; PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL ,SQUARE FOOTAGE OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT; SAID PARCELS BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, AMENDING THE REVISED ZONING MAP ACCORDINGLY, PROVIDING THAT ALL DEVELOPMENT OF SAID PROPERTY SHALL PROCEED IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS AS SUBMITTED AND APPROVED AND ALL APPLICABLE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA; PROVIDING A CONFLICTS CLAUSE; A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, AND AN . EFFECTIVE 'DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. . .1 jj WHEREJ\S, the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida. has heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 80-19 in which a Revised Zoning Map was adopted for said City, and WHEREAS, ~ieran J. Kilday, as agent for the applicant, Tradewinds Development Corp. , d/b/a' TRADEWINDSGROUP, and the owners of the subject parcels, has heretofore filed a Petition with the City of Boynton Beach, Florida pursuant to Section 9 .of Appendix A-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances, City of Boynton Beach, Florida for the purpose of rezoning certain parcels of land consisting of approximately 28.8455 acres (:1:) located within the municipal limits of said City,' said property being more particUlarly described hereinafter, from R-1A ('Single Family Residential District), R-3 (MUltiple-Family Dwelling District) and C-2 (N!!ighborhood Commercial District) to Planned Commercial Development, WHEREAS, the City Commission entered into a Stipulation , and Settlement Agreement which was approved by JUdge :.;'1"1" , ..~. ' \'. . I i " ~.~ . ~: ti. " t:, ,. f i" It '~ \ 1 ...::~~.'~' '~i,:('t ':':~:i:.:,N~~ r '~f:t;>~P~ .:: : :y~ ;~;:: .r j'!~ ;' ~b" ri~~t' ;#l~::A'r. ... :~l:'IP;I~k ,~:~,;:L:4~ ;~.' ~ ::t9 ~ . .~I) '--'-' ~. ~} I .il ~ I Rudnick's Order 1>.pproving Settlement 1>.greement on November 6, 1986. and subject to a further Order by Judge Rudnick on January 27. 1987. and subject also to a Mandate and Opinion which affirmed the trial court's Orders. and subject 'also to Judge Rodger's Order Granting ~radewinds Motion for Contempt on October 21, 1988, and lastly. subject to the Fourth District Court of Appeals Per Curiam 1>.ffirmation of Judge I Rodger's Contempt Order on June 7. 1989. copies of which are all attached hereto, and the City commission is, therefore, being required to comply with the aforesaid Stipulation and Settlement 1>.greement. ~ WHEREl\S, ,the Circuit for the 15th Judicial Court Circuit on the 31st day of October, 1989. issued an or,jer amending the City's 1986 comprehensive Plan in conformance with above mentioned Stipulation and Settlement the 1>.greement. Said Order being attached hereto and ~ncorporated herein, NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT ORD1\INED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEl\Cn, FLORID1\: Section 1, That the following described land, located in the City of Boynton Beach. Florida, to wit: See attached Exhibit "1>." be and the same is hereby rezoned from R-1~ (Single-Family Residential District) R-3 (Multiple-Family Dwelling District). and C-2 (Neighborhood commercial District) to Plarmed Commercial Development. which use is determined to I be appropriate under the circumstances agreed upon by the City in said Stipulation and settlement 1>.greement and in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Boynton ,Beach. Florida. Section 2. That the aforesaid Revised Zoning Map of, the city shall be amended accordingly. 2 ._-"'_...........~JI..:t~~..,-'...__..........~_~, ."-'frlil1l.....-..; , "r . .... .... . . ~ ~ I " . :1K ," ,',~,', .~ "\ .' , : .! ~ . " ~~; I~' !~,.~., ," ~i~' l;-' " H ','2. J.lI'~.~'~.~~ ~'r ~~\:iiw .. ..f ~ '. ...... '. . ,. ~., .:. .H:,>"""l: '. :I.:..'~.. '.; .., .:.::....,:.t... i ::.~#, .,. Y .~,; ,.l~ .. J I.... . 1.' ::.",., '. ~ ~~~,~ ::"4 ., , :, '~': ," '. : ,,', ;.. " .~~.... ~~h';"'. II "..... ( '..~A'I.. I l.It::.~IO,.~~~'-' 1 I .' L ...~" ~ , ' ~ -.;'~, 'I ./ ....'. J.,"",j , , ;~~' ( ~;~v" ."".f.....'. ~?:.:-:; ~ ~ ~.--. .'" 'i'"~'-... //..~ '-. ~~.~,..~.tl,'1Uil...:~.;:,...;;:...~:a.J.w.LJ.:~.:r~a::..t2E,::~.. .,.'-.l,tII-..-- II j .". .......-_p.~, ,9-::" -....'~ 0,'. _. ....~ . _ ,_~ ;i " Ii I I I II Ii II II II II II II I! ,I :1 II III I ,I II il !r III , :1 I I I I I I I .Section 3. That the application of the owners and agents of the subject property for rezoning is hereby granted for the purpose of permitting the development of said land as a Planned Commercial Development (peD) , 1: specifically in accordance with the aforementioned Stipulation and Settlement Agreement and Court Orders in Case No. 86-3661 (eL)A, all which respectively enforced the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement and found this City in ...... ',--"_." Except as provided herein, the Applicant shall proceed to file site plans of any part or all of the PCD for review by the appropriate departments of the City government i'n accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach. and the site plans shall also be subject to review with respect to subdivision, platting. building permitting, and any or all applicable rules and regulations of any \ \ \ '\. "\ \ \. \' \ \. ,(,01 contempt of court. governmental entity having jurisdiction over land ~evelopment and bUilding permitting within the City of Boynton 'Beach, Section 4. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Ordinance. the applicant shall be permitted to construct an additional 121,000 square feet of commercial building area over and above that permitted by the aforementioned Stipulation and Settlement Agreement. This addi tional square footage of commercial development shall require off-site traffic improvements identified in the October 23. 1989. Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., traffic , I " i '.i' I ' 1 ~ : ~ -~. if ---;-.. ~~ . ,t, t, ;f, If',: report, attached hereto and incorporated herein, subject to final approval or modification of said reports' findings by the City Commission on November 7. 1989. Section 5. That all ordinances parts of or otdinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed. 3 ~~ /' o '(:.~i f):.:\ ;', .',......... :. /;.' (7.'\\ \.V Section 6. Should any scc\:i.on or provision of this ordinance or portion hereof, any paragraphl, sentence. or word be declared by a court, of competent jurisdiction to be invalid. or should any Section of this Ordinance not become effective for any rcas~n, such decision shall not affect the remainder of this ordinance. Section 7. Authority is hereby granted to codify said ordinance. Section 8. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon passage. FIRST READING this 17th day of October. 1989. SECOND. FINAL READING and PASSAGE this ..:3./$f" day of d~ fev . 1989. ~. ~~ Vice Mayor Commissioner , , ATTEST: ~J~ City rk (Corporate Seal) ,. 4 ~,'~'<'"'.'.~~__':"iYI:"'~., _~Yt ~ ~I ,...~":f':"";!!"T""'~M"1"""-' ~",_.",~,:"-...~..,... ,; I'.~~ f ... ., ., ,. ., \ .. r.,.,,;'t::r'/)/.'NN:,'" .~.".~.' .:',';.;..J;'~ _'~:..~.D:~ '~1-~~',~l':\'.J~~~':;A'/.b':.Il~~"~...~,J.~I!'~'Z'~~.. _. _. _~' '.':"""-"'~' ~ ,.' ~ oJ. LAW OFFICES I !T~9~&:~~ SUITE 1000 u,es PALM BEACH l.AKES aOUL.EVARD ~ g;~ &geaat. sr~ 33#0'/ 1989 9.J?I: A~' ~.~'^ :\f ~ AREA CODe "'07 \1 TELEPHONE ere.aeoo ~,\ TELE,.,o.x ese.asla ,0 DRAFT, ,.. M...RTIN PP.:RRY JILL .... .JARKES.,. LAURENCE G. 1.1:1:05 October 31, c Robert Critton, Esq. Slawson, Burman & Critton Suite 300 712 U.S. Highway #1 North Palm Be~ch, FL 33408 RE: Tradewinds Development Corp. vs. City o~ Boynton Beach Stipulation Regarding Enhancements Your File No. 89-115 Dear Bob: ,~~";. Let me start by addressing the -fine issue" in the 1985 case. We are in agreement that both parties will ask the Court to deem the fine to be compensatory as opposed to punitive. Further,' the Court will determine the timing and the disposition of the fine. Also, the fine shall be used as a setoff in the 1987 suit, in the event of an adverse judgement. With respect to enhancements, both parties desire to proceed with certain zoning enhancements relating to the PUD and PCD, which are commonly known as the Tradewinds project. It is agreed that these enhancements bene~it both parties in the sense that any value which is subsequently assigned to these enhancements shall be used by' the City as a setof~ to any adverse verd~ct which may be entered against the City o~ Boynton Beach in the case styled: Tradewinds Development Corporation vs. The City o~ Boynton Beach, Case Number 87-1538 AI. The enhancements have been identi~ied as ~ollows: 1. The additional 121,000 square ~eet o~ commercial retail in the Tradewinds PCD. 2. Increased acreage in the PCD by adding to the PCD acreage of approximately 5.1 +/- acres which is currently locate~ within the southeastern boundary of the PUD. 3. Changing the area Commercial to Local five acres in size alignment of S.W~ 8th on the PCD presently designed as Of~ice Retail. This area is approximately and lies westerly of the proposed Street. . .,.....'i;.!:l;~;~,~,.,E1<~'~,.< .'I~;~~1:::~'-""''''' '--w;~'5L .:(....~ . R~bert D. Critton, Esq. . .. . October 31, 1989 Page '2 I DRAFf . ' 4. Changing the PUD to allow xor up to 600 multi-xami~y units.. This eliminates the single xamily units.. The 600 unit approval is based upon demonstration that there will be no significant increase in traffic for the PUO. , The parties will agree to enter into a stipulation which provides for the setofxs as set forth above. ~ Further, Tradewinds represents that the enhancements set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above go hand in hand and do not have separate values apart from each other. In this regard, Tradewinds acknowledges that the value of enhancements #1 and #2 combined may range from a low of $2,420,000.00 to a high of $3,400.000.00. A determination as to a methodology that will be used to determine a value to be assigned for purposes of setoff is set forth hereafter. Enhancement #1 shall be adopted at the meeting scheduled for October 31, 1989 which is the second reading of Ordinance No. 89-~~~. Enhancement #2 shall be handl.d through the change to the Comprehensive Plan redesignating the reference~ acreage from PUD to PCD, making this ac~eage eligible for rezoning upon submission of applications by'Tradewinds. With regard to the enhancements, referenced 8S #3 and #4,. Tradewinds acknowledges that these may have substantial value, but the parties have been unable to agree as to a specific value to assign or a range of values to assign, 88 has been done with regard to enhancements #1 and #2. Enhancement #3 shall be approved through the November 7, 1989 adoption ox the Comprehensive Plan. Enhancement #4 shall be approved as a result of the Comprehensive Plan adoption, and based upon a demonstration that there will be no significant increase in traffic for the PUD. The ultimate value arranged to be assigned to this enhancement will be based upon requests made by Tradewinds in the number of units ultimately approved. The parties agree that issue as an admission pending damage action. neither party will use the enhancement of liability against the other in the Absent agreement on a specific number for setoff as to each enhancement, the parties agree that the values shall be determined by arbitration. The arbitrators shall consist of either three (3) shopping center developers having substantial experience in the acquisition and development of sites for shopping centers in Palm Beach County, Florida or a combination of such shopping center develop~rs and an MAl appraiser selected !T ~ 9~ &: ~~ 9e9/ ;;.".-...."*-'-----~..... ~k~:*'~:,;.Slt,':<d..;,'.cr. '.hW",f,"~m~--"''''.~.W ,,~ :m;':'",iti,,~:m:" \'IIIIIIl ' DRAFT ~ n~bert D. Critton, Esq. ~ctober 31, 1989 , Page 3 'wj , 1~1l-iY .i ~fJ' r\ r~v \Y . by the shopping center developerS'.. A list of acceptable .. shopping center developers shall be developed ,between the parties. Each party shall select one developer as his arbitrator. The two developers shall select a neutraldevelo~er or a neutral MAI~ppraiser and the three arbitrators will hear evidence regarding the value 0% the enhancements. A decision by two o:f the three arbitrators shall be binding upon the parties. The :fee of the three arbitrators shall be split equally among the parties. It is :further agreed that an arms-length sales transaction as to anyone or all o:f the enhancements shall be considered competent substantial evidence o:f the value o:f the enhancement. Final implementation o:f enhancements #3 and #4 will be as a result o:f a subsequent rezoning application. No seto:f:fs :for any enhancements will be provided until such time as the enhancements are actually approved by the City Commission o:f the City o:f Boynton Beach and ,are able to be implemented by Tradevinds through development permits. In the event third party litigation threatens the 'enhancements,' then Tradewinds reserves the right to drop any and all enhancements and have the approvals contemplated by the 1986' Stipulation and Settlement Agreement reinstated :forthwith, in which event there shall be no seto%%s against damages as contemplated herein. ~ ~1i ,t,! >i -i ~ ';J In the event that this proposal meets with the approval o:f a majority 0% the City Commission, then we shall require their %urther authorization and instruction to you to sign this letter in the manner indicated at the close o:f this letter, con:firming the proposal set :forth herein. FMP/bac il " j APPROVED AND pursuant to Commission o:f AGREED TO this day of /'. '1989 authorization granted by the Boynton Beach City at a public hearing held on 'day . 1989. '" SLAWSON, BURMAN & CRITTON Robert D. Critton, Jr~ Esq. Attorneys for the City of Boynton Beach, Florida \'~ . ~:.~ S:~9;~&~,9d e -- SuPp. No. 35 APPENDIX A-ZONING Sec. 9 , ,~, employees. An estimate of the number of employ-},.; ees shall not be required, however, for applica~~fI~ tions which are initiated by the city. I: .J>;, . I' .c'",' (5) A comparison of traffic which would be :generated}:ii under the proposed zoning or development, with';i~ the traffic that would be generated Under the cur- rent zoning; also, an analysis of traffic movements .......! at the intersections of driveways that wlould serve:6i:~.' the property and surrounding roadways, and im-'.,,:Z provement that would be necessary to. accommo-,; date such traffic movements. For proposed devel-.... opments which would generate three. thousand';.: (3,000) vehicle trips per day or more, or two hun- dred fifty (250) or more single-directional vehicle trips within a one-hour period, a traffic impact analysis shall be required. Said traffic impact anal- ysis shall include projected trip generationJor the development, for all major roadways and intersec- tions within one and one-half (1.5) miles of the subject parcel, as well as traffic that would utilize local streets through residential zoning districts. Said traffic impact analysis shall compare traffic. , 1938.1 ~ ~ \ : :WWH\/: ,1.. \;, 'r '~~".'i~Jl] 'tll' '.1' l~ I'J l' (t r); l'e \'1 n I' o '., _... .1t.. v...1 A. 0" ..' .,~ 'j {:' ()f E}c~ V L1~' t. 'I Boule-val j 331'\ "cn' (. d ,.; iods P,9rcel (\Voolbrigh: Ph-lce Pl: p (.~J rn ]" '.!~IS (In acf" L).T1 rJ. \\/(I~ rf ,-:'Ct '2.d 21l ~ ~';'i~~ j\ ;~-, nest. t ,:';1\!11vsis h3~';; " '\-l C}!-~ '; r ~- ~' "" \ r ~ i t I"; 'I f'. ;',,-._c ~T' .'>.' L,'cl;:ed at ;'U1 i'-t; ,)11 01 !. ~<-~,.,,-, ;t~~l!S I his. n~' c! " :-l! j :~nrt ~. :~r: ~d \' 1 L(', Ci'~;-ls'!slT..rlt I,Yil;" .r~ndil.~ '-l-, :, (': ~ 'i-p ,.. f. ...~, , ~ j ~ Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. TRAFFIC &: TRANSPORTATION · PLANNING · ENGINEERING · lAND DEVELOPMENT INVOICE Mr. Tim Cannon, Acting Director of Planning City of Boynton Beach P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33435-0310 Tradewinds PUD Court Review WHK #0430 Invoice #1051 October 31, 1989 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES; REVISE CONSERVATION ELEMEI"ll OF THE CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO ELIMINATE NATURAL AREAS LOCATED WITHIN THE lRADEWINDS PARCEL AS PER COURT ORDERED SETlLEMENT, PREPARE lRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES AND REVIEW RELATIVE TO THE lRADEWINDS PARCEL LOCATED IN THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA THRU OCTOBER 31, 1989: Revise Conservation Element & Traffic Review Services Staff Costs: President: Project Manager: Adm. Assistant: Technician : 14 Hrs @ $100.00 /Hr 7 Hrs @ $60.00 /Hr 2 Hrs @ $35.00 /Hr 27 Hrs @ $25.00/Hr $1,400.00 $420.00 $70.00 $675.00 $2,565.00 Expenses: Mileage .......... .................... Report Copying ..................... $52.50 $84.96 $137.46 $2,702.46 Total Amount Due This Invoice ............ $2,702.46 It'JE'~ C.., .'E.' .,~. . ,. , ;; -, .i -~\..~: ;.: :: ~ ;.'.'. -.' '. "';j L Q64989 ... ~iN~:~ 0EP~. .... -- 10211 W. SAMPLE ROAD, SUITE 204 . P.O. BOX 9740 CORAL SPRINGS. FLORIDA 33075-9740 (305) 755-3822. (407) 732-7844 (Palm Beach) Walter H. K ler Jr., Inc. TRAFFIC Ii:: TRAhSPORTATION · PLANNING · ENGINEERING. LAND DEVELOPMENT INVOICE Mr. Tim Cannon, Acting Director of Planning City of Boynton Beach P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33435-0310 Tradewinds PUD Court Review WHK #0430 Invoice #1051 October 31, 1989 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: REVISE CONSERVATION ELEMENT OF THE CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO ELIMINATE NATURAL AREAS LOCATED WITHIN THE TRADEWINDS PARCEL AS PER COURT ORDERED SETI1..EMENT, PREPARE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES AND REVIEW RELATIVE TO THE TRADEWINDS PARCEL LOCATED IN THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA THRU OCTOBER 31,1989: Revise Conservation Element & Traffic Review Services Starr Costs: President: Project Manager: Adm. Assistant: Technician : 14 Hrs @ $100.00 !Hr 7 Hrs @ $6O.00!Hr 2 Hrs @ $35.00 /Hr 27 Hrs @ $25.00 /Hr $1,400.00 $420.00 $70.00 $675.00 $2,565.00 Expenses: Mileage .... ....... ................... Report Copying ..................... $52.50 $84.96 $137.46 $2,702.46 Total Amount Due This Invoice ............ $2,702.46 10211 W. SAMPLE ROAD, SUlTE-204 . P,O, BOX ~740 CORAL SrRINGS. FLORIDA 33075-9740 (305) 755-3822. (407) 732-7844 (Palm Beach) .._--_..._.._~~:.._._,----------:..::.._----=----:....:...:.-- Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION · PLANNING. ENGINEERING. LAND DEVELOPMENT November 30, 1989 Mr. Tim Cannon, Acting Planning Director City of Boynton Beach P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33435-0310 Re: Invoice for Services Tradewinds Parcel (Woolbright Place PUD) Dear Mr. Cannon: I have enclosed Invoice #1062 relative to charges for the Tradewinds Parcel for the month of November 1989. Note that this invoice exceeds the upset amount in my proposal of September 10, 1989 which was executed by the City Attorney. When the proposal was prepared, the scope of services was limited to revisions to the Conservation Element and a Traffic Analysis. Because of the significance of the City's position in this effort, additional analysis has been performed at the City's request. For this reason, the upset figure used in the September proposal has been exceeded. The additional work efforts include alternative analysis of various land development scenarios, preparation of cost estimates and addi tional meetings with th~e g'ty,s Ie I det~nse tea . Sl c ely , t Walter H. Keller Jr., PE., AICP. President WHK/us Attachment cc: Raymond Rea, City Attorney !RECEIVED 0....'" t(" 8 '1,,988 ' Pi Po f\I,.' ". . ~jy ~ NG 0,....- cPT. ---- -- 10211 W. SAMPLE ROAD, SUITE 204. P.O. BOX 9740 CORAL SPRINGS, FLORIDA 33075-9740 (305) 755-3822 · (407) 732-7844 (Palm Beach) Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. TRAFFIC& TRANSPORTATION · PLANNING · ENGINEERING. LAND DEVELOPMENT INVOICE Mr. Tim Cannon, Acting Director of Planning City of Boynton Beach P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33435-0310 Tradewinds PUD Court Review WHK #0430 Invoice #1062 November 30, 1989 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: PREPARE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS, COST ESTIMATES AND ASSIST THE CITY ATTORNEY RELATIVE TO THE TRADEWINDS PARCEL LOCATED IN THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA THRU NOVEMBER 30,1989: Traffic Review Services Staff Costs: President: Project Manager: Technician : 15 Hrs @ $100.00 IRr 24 Hrs @ $60.00 /Hr 12 Hrs @ $25.00 IHr $1,500.00 $1,440.00 $300.00 $3,240.00 Expenses: Mileage Printing $57.50 $2.40 $59.90 S3,299.90 Total Amount Due This Invoice ............ $3,299.90 10211 W. SAMPLE ROAD, SUITE 204. P.O. BOX 9740 CORAL SPRINGS, FLORIDA 33075-9740 (305) 755-3822 · (407) 732-7844 (Palm Beach) _ __ _____~____.~_.____::.~--;::~- .~::::._ ...'i....~. ~_ r:.'" .._-~-_.- -. Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. TRAFFIC &: TRANSPORTATION · PLANNING. ENGINEERING. LAND DEVELOPMENT September 10, 1989 Mr. George Hunt, Acting City Manager City of Boynton Beach 200 N. Seacrest Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 RECEI,TED SEP 25. ,Ig~ Re: Proposal for Professional Services Tradewinds Parcel (Woolbright Place PUD) Dear Mr. Hunt: C!TY ATTORN::'Y Walter H. Keller, Jr., Incorporated, is pleased to submit this proposal to provide professional services to the City of Boynton Beach relative to traffic analysis and Conservation Element revisions based on the Tradewinds Parcel (Woolbright Place PUD) in the City of Boynton Beach, Florida. Walter H. Keller, Jr., Incorporated, hereafter referred to as the Consultant, proposes to provide the following services to the City of Boynton Beach, hereafter referred to as the Client, for the fees stipulated herein. SCOPE OF SERVICES Task 1- Conservation Element Revisions The Consultant will modify the various maps, tables and text portions of the Conservation Element of the Comprehensive Plan relative to the Tradewinds Parcel. This work requires deleting all references to conservation sites #11 and 13 and modifying the ".Comprehensive Plan accordingly. The Consultant will make the necessary revisions and forward them to the City in an expeditious manner. Task 2 - Traffic Analysis The consultant will prepare a traffic analysis of the impacts of modifying the Land Use Plan to incorporate the Tradewinds Parcel (Woolbright Place PUD) in lieu of the land uses previously included in the Plan. The consultant will address the additional traffic impact:; and identify the impacts to lev;;;! of service.. The consultam will also suggest locations where reductions or revisions in Land Use will mitigate the additional traffic impacts created by the Tradewinds Parcel. The consultant will also describe the consistency with the current and former Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards. continued ... 10211 W. SAMPLE ROAD, SUITE 204 . P.O. BOX 9740 CORAL SPRINGS, FLORIDA 33075-9740 (305) 755-3822. (407) 732-7844 (Palm Beach) ~~ "_._,-~I~,__ . '_ .___...,_.~t __..__.__.___"'_________~_____________,__ Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. Mr. George Hunt, Acting City Manager September 10, 1989 Page Two COMPENSATION As compensation for services rendered by the Consultant, the City agrees to pay the Consultant according to the number of hours charged and the hourly rate of the individual involved as identified below. The hourly charges will be subject to an upset limit of Forty-Nine Hundred Dollars ($4,900.00). Principal Project Manager Senior EngineerlPlanner EngineerlPlanner Graphics Illusrrator Administrative Assistant Draftsman/Technician Clerical $ 100.00 $ 60.00 $ 50.00 $ 40.00 $ 35.00 $35.00 $ 25.00 $ 20.00 Invoices will be submitted monthly or at project completion. Out-of-pocket expenses such as printing, courier delivery, xerox, photographic work, aerial photographs, etc., will be billed at cost. The Client will make its best effort to pay invoices within thirty days of receipt of invoice from the Consultant. TIME OF PERFORMANCE The Consultant has commenced work on Task 1 of this proposal after'verbal notice to proceed. Work on Task 2 will not be initiated until a verbal approval or receipt of City Purchase Order. The consultant will prepare on work efforts in an expeditious manner. DOCUMENTS All documents, maps, drawings and reports prepared by the Consultant under this agreement shall become and remain the property of the Client. LIMITS OF LIABILITY Except upon the express permission of the City, Consultant will not Incur any obligations on or in the name of the Client. continued... - .- --",'.--.-. ._----_._._~----,_._-,------------ Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. Mr. George Hunt, Acting City Manager September 10, 1989 Page Three TERMINATION This agreement once signed may be terminated by the Client by giving written notice. Consultant shall be paid for services rendered to the date of termination on the basis of his reasonable estimate of that portion of the work completed prior to the termination. The Consultant shall also be paid for all reasonable expenses incurred to such date of termination. ApPROVAL The acceptance of this proposal can be signified by verbal approval and signing in the space provided below or by issue of a City Purchase Order. One signed copy shall be return d to the Consultant and will serve as the agreement between the parties. smcere~ ,tuf Walter H. Keller, Jr., PE., AICP President WHKlus cc; Raymond Ray ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL The above fees, terms and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. Consultant is authorized to perform the work as outlined in this proposal/agreement. gPr al Accepted By: _1-11''0-1 p- Q., Name aymond Rea City Attorney Title 9/25/89 Date _ ._~W~~. ~_~~ . ....------..-. ~ -..-.--.-.-. I'J ,)-C. ~ . , I I I I I . I I I I , 1 , 1 T'~ff IC r'(K(AArtO'l TII.. tr.H Ic ql'nl'r.t ~'., potl'"t III of tile dHf.....nt '.n j u"" wlt"'n thft propov'r! P"" jfOrt .n dfl""",In.cl 1.I,lnq trlfflc ~N'r.t Il"'lft I"lt" frc:- Florldll OOT IInd r..I," ~fIIII(h (nlnty trlfflc ~.'.tlnn r~rt' ~nd tnfflc ~nprllll~n r..port, from till' ~,tltut' 0' t'ln,po,tltlnn (nqlnp,.,~, AUI'd IJIlO" tll.. fit tllMU,d ,q~'" raotl. or tll" e~"r III ,,..a. :~.< i~ ~f , I d.l1y lr..rrlr I'/l'nprlltlon r.tt or 100 trlp,Jl,oon '/1UII'" 'Pt i. GF"A WI' dl't,",,1 ncod. ,..,,. Mt.l h t\UlllItl'd to ten.UI. 10 trl p,/un I ;,'I1I1Y, ~ f\~ r~ ll'r" ~f ~~l:, '!!i. lllj ,~~i" i~r~ '" : .~ .... ~ ~ ~"~\~. .~ t r ~i,i r1" ~\- ! ".J'" ~~;r,,; ~>t ~. .,.'- ,', . " ',:1'1,,' IItl1l1lnfj thco-." t,rllHI( !Jf'fI.'ltlon ntl!!i. till' InUI ,',Ily vehlel. trip pnd ql'nl'r.tlon f'r tile dl'v.lopMl'nt wIth l00~ 0(1 'pllnty I' ,~arl1I'd hplow~ rOlmM'rclel 0,000 1,000 Mot..' .. fin lIn/lly\''l WII\ "1'1"0--11 rfllIItlY. to tll.. IntflrMl 11".1 "'.I'rnlll Impact of thl' lotll'j ~rllvl'l qfln."ratlon. It It utllllllt,.d tl'at ?(") \lI'hlel. trip' (400 trip I'NfI,) wIll "fIIII,ln In,ld. th" dtl\l,,'~1lllfInt l th.... till' elltem" Il'lpsct "IOuld bf' 8,600 vphlcl"rlp, dilly. 4 ~ " - -',- 1. ---- --...... ";\!"~~.I::I::::.. -';; .- .., PLANNING DATA Land use info~~tion was provid~d by Waltp~ Taft Bradshaw and .odlltes. The A'!velopment will cons1,t 0" a cOfl'munfty shopping center ~~d a mot~l. The charactprfsti~s of the development are listed below: COl?ll1erc fa 1 Area .\0,000 ~q. Ft. GFA lOa Units Mot!!l Other data collected for thfs project included roadway inventory nd IMl'lulll traffic counts on Woolbright Road IInd 24 hour trllffl~ counts from the Pll;i~ Beach County EngineerfnlJ De!lll,.tment. \j \. \!J '\J) 3 '~ ,:\ '~ '~ f .' .l 'i .. ~ :a: r~' . .' ... ~:I~ r ,\ , ~ ~ 'I. '.' .'. 'II ". '" t ~ ~...I ~ I ~ I: ~.....I ~ i ~I A ~ i I II OJJ!~JJl_Ul.11),!j _.AlIO__A.SS.1 GN!"f.:':~ rl"Ol'l I rfvlew of the "xl'.ti"ll IInd aPllrOl/rd r1f":1'1n,..",.,,~ j" Cf'ntrlll Pal", Bellch County and cOMld"rlnll tll" artl'rlal nl'.",nr~ wi t., It~ tral/pl tl>.!t char.cterhtlcs, t~ extfrM1 traffic dl\trPw'\')'1 ..as (~ C\llHf'" tll' c(1llt!ll'rchl .nd I!l('\tf'l trip "'111.., Tllp eoxtel'Ml t,.,'fir. flF 1->"tl1 t..~ c~rc1a1 .n'" "nl1 tll.' I'V\teol 1oIf'M' ~~r11ed hv I"'.;(H. di<ld~"t :'I" ri'.'-"c")'. (....I' ngu", 1) ilnd thl' f(\l1owilll1 t.~hlp dl'lllct~ thl' ~\!"l'MI'\,. 01l'flctlnn cf T.!.1 P._ [)1.\.t!'Jb~.t.lons North [a~ t o:,ollth Wl'\t Pf'rCI'nt of [\t. ~~,r.c1 a.l_lr_~ps ('0':: ;'0'- Z~'t 40'\'. r"'l"'l f'lMt \~r \o;t, flnt!' 1 T ,"p<, ;(1 . c . ( . :I" ' 1,,- The d1stribllt~d traffIc wu thl'" a\..l11""d to HI" 1',lst;"<1 /Ir'..r!> Thl illlplct trAffic ,I..,IC\nllW'nt loin col'lblned wit" l"xlc;U"Q t""fflr /IS sh,,,," in Fig.,,.. 2. The dAily t\OlO-w.,y V!'hlcula . traffic 1/0lu""'~ wt'~" cor vlIfted to Pfllk hour dll'l'cttonal vnlulTlf'S lit the t'ntl'/In~" to till' dl".;f' I 'Hl"'" \ bA~~d upon t~ following criteria: Mottol Cn""'" r~ \ ~ 1 1'... k Hour File tor 9'1'. <,0 ~ Itl r,o~, OllT H" sr.'. 1'1 5'" ('\IT s _. ---'--":', bG!) , , , :f ., .. "~'l\ , 11 , '. " !lr :;~ ?! . :~ , ~.$ ~ '" ~ :~l ;w, . ~~ 'i '~ L_m I NTROOUCT ION Boynton Interc"anqe Plaza is to be locaetEtd on Woolbr.o1ght Road at 1-95 in Boynton Be,ch, Florida. (See Figure 1). Mr. Stephen J. Jarvis retained Kimley-Ho~n and Associates. Inc. to determine the 11~ely traffic impact which the p--oposed development would have on the adjacf'ant arterial system. Known, observed travel characteristies were utilized where possible an(' one hundred percent development and occupancy were aSlumed. Therefore. th~ resulting traffic 1mp~ct is the maximum which could be expected when th~ project is c~~letely developed. 1 l '. ~ .~ , 1 'i '1 J .. 1 ! 1 i i J .. " , t I j 1 ., .:.Ii I 1 f i I / / --I - ( ,._~~ ROADWAY REQUIREMENTS In order to assess the general roadway requirements. roadway and entrance sections were examined to see if they had sufficient capacity to a 11 ow operation at 1 evel of service "C" during the peak hou~ wi th the impact of the development. All capacity calculations were carried out following the criteria of the 1965 Highway Capacity Manual ~nd utilizing the ~Intersection Capacity AnalysiS Charts and Procedures" published by the Traffic Institute. Northwestern Univenity. The peak hour directional vol~s shown on figure 2 were used in the capacity analysis. Improvements as required were assu.ed for final capacity analysis for the area roadways. The following criteria were assUlled for the intersection analysis: (1) All lanes. including turning lanes are 12 feet with high standards (2) Five percent truck traffic occurs at peak hour (3) level of s~rvice ~C. is achieved with the following G.C. ratios: 2 !>tease - 0.90 3 Phase - 0.85 4 Phase - 0.80 Using the above criteria. the lane requireRnts for the entrance to the develOpRent were dete...ined and are shawl In figure 3 along with the general roadway n!QuiteDents in terftK of number of throu(1h 1~~t; "~~J The following is a brief discussion of these requirements: Woolbright Road at the entrance to the development pr2sently exists as a four lane facility with a separate left turn lane provided on the east dPvrllach. .0 ada1"t,iorhtl looe n~'qul('o;;li.:lits wiH Ue rh:eued on Ud~ f......d .'-.1' A separate left and right turn lane will be required on the south approach. ., -; Old Standards LOS "C" MOOM Scenario 1 Impact Fees k to d~(~fe ~:~tlv' *Congress Avenue Add 2 Lanes from Boynton Beach Boulevard to SW 23rd Avenue continued... Current Standards LOS "0" Barton Aschman Scenario 2 Impact Fees SW 8th Street New Construction 2 Lane from exist Ml access to Wool- bright Rd Woolbrlght Rd Add 2 Lanes from Congress A venue to 1-95 $950,000 r ~'\. .:d- ~ ~"w.~ Ott\,17J1l9 .. Impact Fees SW 8th Street New Construction 2 Lane from exist MI access to Wool- bright Rd Woolbright Rd Add 2 Lanes from Congress Avenue to 1-95 $950,000 Boynton Beach Bd Add 2 Lanes from SW 8th Street to 1-95 $ N/A 1-95 Add 2 Lanes from Boynton Beach Boulevard to Atlantic Avenue $ N/A Congress Ave Add 2 Lanes from Boynton Beach Boulevard to Old Boynton Road $ N/A ke e, (ei~(C'?5 Woolbright Place PUD . Summary or Required Improvements 12/27189 Old Standards LOS "C" MDDM Scenario 1 Woolbright Rd/ SW 8th Street New Construction (15OUiiI;i Southbound 't:efC Southbound 'fhru. Southbound Right Add Westbound Left, Westbound Right Signal oordmated Timing with 1-95 $'I ,000 Woolbright RdlI-95 t Add Eastbound Left Add Northbound Left $750,000 Current Standards LOS "D" Barton Aschman Scenario 1 $750,000 Woolbright RdI Congress Ave Add Westbound Left, Westbound Right $50,000 Woolbright Rd/ Seacrest Blvd Add Eastbound Right Restripe to North- bound left, North- bound Thru-Left, Northbound Right $17,500 Current Standards LOS "C" WHK Jr., Inc. Scenario 1 Woolbright Rd/ SW 8th Street New Construction Southbound Left. Southbound Thru, Southbound Right !reef $40,000 Woolbright Rd/ 1-95 Add Eastbound Thru, Westbound Thru. $1,750,000 Source: Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. Notes: Scenario I - Original Land Use Mix, projections based on 1985 base year. Scenario 2 - 600 DU's, 320 KSF Commercial, Church. School.1989 base year. t - MDDM states improvement based on impacts from Palm Beach Commerce Center · - Recently Improved to 6LD if I. dtlO I ~ 'ff2 ~ yea ~ f5'tf /lot) ~ $"7 ~ ~o Old Standards Current Standards Current Standards MDDM Barton Aschman WHK Jr., Inc. Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 2 Impact Fees Impact Fees Impact Fees Impact Fees SW 8th Street SW 8th Street SW 8th Street NC 2L from exist NC 2L from exist NC 2L from exist Ml access and Ml access to Ml access to 1lo.Trt AT T"\, 1."-__ ....K1 UT...........1L-.:_t... DA '"IT,..,,..lt....~"''',. DA ., '1:'.;' ..~:r:).~ . .,,~':"-'""1 - APPENDIX A-ZONING &C. 9 .j levels between the existing zoning and the pro- posed zoning or development of the subject parcel, and shall take into consideration all development that would be possible under the current zoning within the city, adjacent cities, and within the unincorporated area of Palm Beach County within a radius of five (5) miles. For those parcels lying in the unincorporated area of Palm Beach Coun- ty, which are not currently zoned for urban land uses, the potential land uses according to the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan shall be used. Where said parcels are shown on the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan under reSidential land use categories, the midpoint of the density range shown on County Comprehensive Plan shall be used. Where a county-wide study of traffic gener- ation at build-out has been adopted or is utilized by Palm Beach County, the levels of traffic that are projected by said study shall in all cases be used to project background traffic in the traffic impact analysis submitted by the applicant. The format and standards used in the traffic impact analysis shall be the same as those which are required by Palm Beach County, with the excep- '. tion of the requirements listed above. Such traffic ,,;';'1 iF ~:p:~~ :~:~:~~o~h~~l t~~~~~':;:~:~c:~~~:~~:: !I',~;.' with t~l~ stdanbdaprdsl whBiCh hhaCve, been ado~ted by or .....t,.....:...1..::...j:.~.~..,t...,.~...>...:...........:...,;:,1 are ub lze y am eac ounty. I :i:. ..;~ .',,: (6) For parcels larger than one (1) acre, a comparison I of the water demand for development under the .. .,. proposed zoning or development with water de-,.:~ mand under the existing zoning. Water demap.dEj... .,:1 shall be estimated using the standards a~optedbY"~'~ ... ..j the Palnl Beach County Health Department for I estimating such demand. unless different stand- .t. ards are justified by a registered engineer. Com- .1 mitment to the provision of improvements to the water system shall also be included, where exist- - - e Supp. No. 26 1938.3 t"(" I( II IlV? IrS ~ c [) /"" r/ / /J I, /0 f/YY' J (:Jell t1V) ? /'v,/(5 If I Summary of RC~i...ied improvements Revised Nov. 22, 1989 Old Standards urrent Standards Old Standards Current Standards Current Standards WHK Jr., Inc. WHK Jr., Inc. MDDM Barton Aschman WHK Jr., Inc. Increment Impact Increment Impact Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 3 Impact Fees Impact Fees Impact Fees Impact Fees SW 8th Street SW 8th Street SW 8th Street NC 2L from exist NC 2L from exist NC 2L from exist l/l(}Vlf Ml access and M 1 access to Ml access to NC 4LD from M1 Woolbright Rd Woolbright Rd [fJV\Ic;Jr I access to Wool- bright Rd Woolbright Rd Woolbright Rd Woolbright Rd Add 2L from Con- Add 2L from Con- Add 2L from Con- gress Ave to 1-95 gress Ave to 1-95 gress Ave to 1-95 Boynton Beach Bd Add 2L from SW 8th St to 1-95 1-95 e~lrJ Add 2LX from 1,1 f Boynton Bch Bd to VV(6 :1 Atlantic Ave Congress Ave Add 2L from Boynton Beach Bd to Old Boynton Rd *Congress Avenue Add 2L from Boyn- ton Beach Bd to SW 23rd Ave Woolbright Rdl Woolbright Rdl Woolbright Rdl SW 8th Street SW 8th Street SW 8th Street NC SBL,SBL,SBT NC SBL.SBTL,SBR NC SBL,SBT,SBR SBR Add EBTR,WBTR Add WBL,WBR NBR Signal/Coordinated Timing wlI-95 Woolbright Rd/I.95 Woolbright Rdl Woolbright Rdl Woolbright Rdl t Add EBL 1-95 West 1-95 1-95 Add NBL Add EBR,SBR Add EBT,WBT,EB Add EBT,WBT,E Woolbright Rdl 1-95 East Add EBL,NBL Woolbright Rdl Congress Ave Add WBL,WBR +48 ~t1ej Woolbright Rdl Seacrest Blvd Add EBR Restripe to NBL, NBTL,NBR Source: Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. Notes: Scenario 1 - Original Land Use Mix, projectio based on 1985 base year. Scenario 2 _ 600 DU's, 320 KSF Commercial, Church, School, projections based on 1989 base year. Scenario 3 _ Analysis based on impacts from dditional trips due to intensified land use. Assumes MDDM improvements in place, p ojections based on 1989 base year. NC - New Construction t - MDDM states improvement based on impacts from Palm Beach Comm e Center * - Recently Improved to 6LD '"''''''' _~r.-,'. "..~.~' 'l'!t:.~,' .',,~.~T'""J' ~ 'l:,,;s;'t.iUflJ'\g~.~---~'Vt!2IJl~A::.:.m. Current Standards Old Standards Current Standards Current Standards WOK Jr., Inc. MDDM Barton Aschman WOK Jr., Inc. Increment Impact Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Impact Fees Impact Fees Impact Fees Impact Fees SW 8th Street SW 8th Street SW 8th Street NC 2L from exist NC 2L from exist NC 2L from exist Ml access and Ml access to M 1 access to NC om Woolbright Rd Woolbright Rd access to Wool- bright Rd Woolbright Rd Woolbright Rd "- Woolbright Rd Add 2L from Con- Add 2L from Con- 'c Add 2L from Con- gress Ave to 1-95 gress Ave to 1-95 ~ / gress Ave to 1-95 Boynton Beach Bd ~ Add 2L from SW 8th St to 1-95 '-- 1.95 , Add 2LX from Boynton Bch Bd to Atlantic Ave Congress Ave Add 2L from Boynton Beach Bd ~ ~~h to Old Boynton Rd *Congress Avenue 'ii\~ Add 2L from Boyn- ton Beach Bd to SW 23rd Ave Woolbright Rd/ Woolbright Rd/ SW 8th Street SW 8th Street NC SBL,SBTL,SBR NC SBL,SBT,SBR Add EBTR,WBTR NBR 1 q<~tJ.'&\{ , '..1)1' =oolbr dII.95 Woolbright Rd/ d EB 1~95 West Add EBR,SBR Woolbright Rd! 1.95 Add EBT.WBT.EB Woolbright Rd/ .95 East BL,NBL Woolbright Rd/ Congress Ave Add WBL.WBR Woolbright Rd/ Seacrest Blvd Add EBR Restripe to NBL, NBTL,NBR Woolbright Rd/ 1-95 Add EBT,WBT,BB I I ~'. i; :lj!l ~.d, /:\ 4' ~. ~ Source: Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. Notes: Scenario 1 - Original Land Use Mix, projections based on 1985 base year. Scenario 2. 600 DU's, 320 KSF Commercial. Church, School. projections based on 1989 base year. Scenario 3 - Analysis based on impacts from additional trips due to intensified land use. Assumes MDDM improvements in place, projections based on 1989 base year. NC - New Construction t - MDDM states improvement based on impacts from Palm Beach Commerce Center '" - Recently Improved to 6LD }