Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS fJv<fiX 7~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #93-321 FROM: J. Scott Miller Ci ty Manager r-_ Tambri J. Heyden J~- Qd/d,dh... , Acting Planning and Zoning ~~~- - TO: DATE: December 16, 1993 RE: Agape Cleaners and Laundry - File No. 780 Major site Plan Modification (Addition) Please place the above-referenced item on the City Commission (sitting as the Community Redevelopment Agency) agenda for December 21, 1993 under Development Plans, Non-Consent Agenda ( CRA) . DESCRIPTION: Jim Hudson, agent and contract purchaser of the property located within the CBD at 521 North Federal Highway (southwest corner of North Federal Highway and N.E. 5th Avenue) is requesting approval of a major site plan modification to allow construction of a 176 square addition to the existing commercial building on site. Other improvements include construction of a four space parking lot, landscaping and building modifications including a color change from white to gray; the addition of egg shell colored shutters, diagonal wood board panels, lattice, and picket fencing; the addition of exterior building-mounted lamps and multi-pane glass windows; and the addition of pale yellow awning/roof structures. The building modifications are proposed to meet the Coastal Village Design district. RECOMMENDATION: The community Redevelopment Advisory Board (CRAB) unanimously recommended approval of this request subject to all staff comments (Building Department Memorandum #93-237 and Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum #93-315) with the exception of comment #7, #12 and #13 of planning and Zoning Department Memorandum #93-315. The consensus of the CRAB was that the utility lines should not have to be relocated underground, since the buildings are existing (comment #7). Also, they felt that any architectural features the applicant is proposing to beautify the building should be allowed, despite the fact that they may encroach setbacks and increase the degree of nonconformity of the commercial structure (comment #12 and #13). The CRAB's motion included a finding of fact that the recommended waivers to codes relative to underground utilities and setback encroachments and to lot size, side yards and living area, will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of persons working or residing within the CBD and will result in additional business activity that is harmonious with the general intent and purpose of the CBD. TJH/jm Att. A:AGAPE.JM ,. < " TO: PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-315 Tambri J. Heyden '71:4- Acting Planning and Zoning Director Dorothy Moore~ zoning and Site Plans Reviewer FROM: DATE: December 9, 1993 RE: Site Plan Review - 2nd review Major Site Plan Modification Project: Agape Cleaners and Laundry LOCATION: 521 North Federal Highway APPLICANT: James Hudson FILE NO.: 780 The amended plans for the above referenced project have been submi tted and reviewed. The following comments are either comments that were not satisfactorily corrected on the amended plans or that were generated as a result of the review of amended plans. All comments shall be corrected. However, it is acceptable to show compliance with the outstanding comments on the plans that are required to be submitted to the Building Department for permit review. The applicant must understand that the following comments are comments generated for site plan review and that additional comments may be forthcoming as a result of the review of the working drawings and documents submitted to the Building Department for permits. All permit documents are reviewed for compliance with the requirements specified in the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. 1. Identify on the plans the existing and proposed use of the on- site building structures. 2. Provide the dimensions and total square footage for all the buildings/structures on the site. 3. Provide elevation view drawings for the building on lots 2 and 3 . 4. Indicate on the plans the vehicular access to the carport and the "open" concrete pad to be used for parking. 5. Please identify and show on the plans the site furnishings/ pedestrian amenities (e.g. bench, trash container) referenced in the CBD landscape code, Section 7.5-57 (1). j. 6. The existing building on lots 1 and 4 that encroaches the Federal Highway right-of-way is a nonconforming structure. Nonconforming structures may be enlarged, as proposed, subject to CRAB and CRA approval of the addition. Approval shall be reviewed against the criteria in section 6.E.7.c. (1) - (4) and Section 6.E.7.e.(2) as follows: (1) That granting the application will not adversely affect the public interest. (2) Expansion will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of persons working or residing within the Central Business District. (3) Approval will to the maximum extent possible bring the building and the site upon which it is located into compliance with city regulations and will improve the physical appearance of the structure. (4) That the expansion will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the central business district. -2- To: Tambri J. Heyden December 10, 1993 (2) All sites will be brought into compliance with the zoning and development regulations of the city to the maximum extent possible. The community redevelopment agency may grant relief from provisions of requirements of the zoning and development regulations of the city provided that they make specific findings of fact that the waiver will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of persons working or residing within the central business district and that the waiver will result in additional business activity that is harmonious with the general intent and purpose of the central business district. Since the criteria include bringing the building and site into compliance with the zoning and development regulations to the maximum extent possible, attached is an outline of the nonconformities of the structures, including which regulations are complied with based on the site plan proposed and staff comments. 7. Pursuant to Section 6. E. 3 of the Zoning Code, provide a note on the plans that all utility lines will be underground and any service equipment required above ground shall be effectively screened. 8. Provide on the plans the dimension of the height of the fixed canopy over the main entrance door on the north side of the building. Note: The minimum required height is 9.0'. 9. There is an inconsistency on the sectional view drawings and the colored elevation view drawings concerning the entry canopy. One plan identifies "asphalt shingles". The colored elevations show "wood shake" finished materials. Either material is acceptable within the Community Design Plan. 10. To show compliance with the Community Design Plan, Coastal Village District, roof material, extend the canopy shown on the north elevations of the plans to include the west, south and more of the north elevations. Note: The configuration and shape of what is presently shown is acceptable but needs to cover more of the structure to constitute a roof material. 11. To show compliance with the Community Design Plan wall element, add the diagonal wood board design shown on the north elevation of the plans to the south and west walls including the new addition. 12. Provide a detail sectional drawing showing the shutters on the east side of the building. Since the structure is nonconforming and building alterations cannot increase the extent to which a structure is nonconforming, the shutters will not be allowed to encroach any farther into the side setbacks. 13. Provide a detail sectional drawing showing the diagonal wood board on the east side of the building. If the board is encroaching into the setbacks it will have to be removed from the drawing for the reason stated in comment 12 above. 14. Provide a note on the landscape plans that the trees and groundcover will comply with the Community Design Plan landscape requirements. -3- -3- To: Tambri J. Heyden December 10, 1993 15. Provide and identify on the landscape plans the required 3.0' hedge on the west side of the accessway, between the parking space and N.E. 5th Avenue. Provide curbing at this location. 16. It is recommended that a 2.0' landscaped strip planted with a Coco Plum hedge be installed along the east side of the accessway in front (east side) of the parking space. Curbing and a wheel stop will be required if the landscaping is installed. 17. Revise the note on the landscape legend to read: "Hedges to be planted eighteen 18" on center, 24" high with an 18" spread". Add note that trees shall have a seven foot (7.0') spread with a three (3") inch caliper at six (6") inches above grade and have six (6.0') feet of clear wood. 18. Please provide near the pedestrian entranceway on N.E. 5th Avenue a flowering tree, selected from the Community Design Plan Landscape Standards list of trees for the Coastal Village district. The CBD landscape code and CBD Guidelines refer to special entrance treatment and flowering trees. 19. To further the intent of special entrance treatments, it is recommended that groundcover be planted on the east side of the driveway. Groundcover species shall be selected from the Coastal Village species list of the Community Design Plan landscape standards. 20. Indicate on the landscape plans the limits of the pervious/impervious areas on the west side of the property. 21. Revise lighting note on landscape plans to reflect the following: a. Site/Parking lot lighting shall provide an average of one (1) foot candle at ground level and be energy efficient, high pressure sodium. b. Pedestrian Lighting shall provide an average of three quarters (3/4) foot candles at ground level and be energy efficient, metal halide. 22. Provide and identify on the plans the "safe corner" intersection at N. E. 5th Avenue and North Federal Highway. Cross visibility within the safe corner shall be maintained at both sides at twenty (20.0') feet with landscaping maintained at a height: between three (3.0) feet and six (6.0') feet. 23. Provide a note on the landscape planting specifications that "plant materials shall be Florida No. 1 or better as specified in the current "Grades and Standards for Nursery Plants". -4- To: Tambri J. Heyden December 10, 1993 24. Due to a deficiency in back-up distance for the parking space along the west property line, it is recommended that the parking lot be redesigned in the following manner: a. Three (3) standard parking spaces, to be located along the south property line. b. One (1) handicapped parking space, with the access aisle on the passenger's (north) side, to be located along the western-most property line. c. One (1) parking space designated as the carport and one space located on the existing 9' x 18' concrete slab on the northwest side of the property. DM/cmc c:agape Attachment . . B uildlng and site regulD.tion.s. No building. structure, land. or water shall be erected" altered. enlarged. or used unless in conformance with the following regulations: Minimum lot frontage 75 feet Minimum lot depth 100 feet Minim1m1 lot area 15,000 square feet a feet at first floor level. None, at all other floors. M;~ift'lum rear yard 20 feet abutting adjacent pr0- perties at first floor leveL a feet abutting street or alley at first floor level. None, at all all other floors. Minimum side yard None, for interior lot lines. a feet abutting street or alley at first floor leveL None, at all other floors. - Minimum waterfnm.t yard Regardless of the orientation of the lot or parcel. an a-foot setback shall be maintained from a bui1~;~g or st:rw:ture _:~d any Davigahle water. Waterfront setb...lP. shall be measured from the ~u~1.7 where the body of water W UDder ctifrerent ~ than the subject i'~u~ liDe., and measured from the meaD high water line if the body of water is under the same ownership as the subject property. Mi~i1"l'l1m1 front yard. M.~ft'lum lot cov~age 75 per cent. 85 per cent for parking prages. M.'Pift'lum st:n1cture height 4S feet. not to exceed. 4 stories. Multiple-family clwelliq unit aeasity ""'.~""WD 10.8 dwelling units per acre. Application of residential density to a parcel shall not iq~ ~o. .53 19:H~ AGAPE CLEANERS AND LAUNDRY 81 feet 100 feet * 7276 Sinqle-Story 17.1' 25.0' *6' encroachment on west side yard/.25'encroachment abutting Federal Highway NIA 33% 15.5' N/A *Nonconformities APPENDIX A-Z'JNING Living area minimum per multiple-family dwelling unit Canopies and awnings Movable awnings over right-of-way Permanent structural projections from buildings Utility lines, mechanical equipment Supp. No. 22 Sec. 6 750 square feet. Canopies or awnings for pedestrian entrance ways, with at least 9 feet clear, may project to the property line in any required yard. Movable awnings may extend not more than 8 feet over a sidewalk in an adjacent right- of-way, provided such awning or 8111' part _ thereof shall maintain a clear height of 9 feet above the sidewalk. Such awnings extending over rights-of-way shall be moved or removed at the request of the city. Eaves, sills, belt course, cor- nices, pilasters, and other architectural features; gut. ters, chimneys, and mechani- cal equipment, may project not more than 3 feet into any required yard, provided that such structures are located within the property lines and conform to established cen- tral business district design guidelines. Utility lines shall be installed underground, and any service equipment required above ground shall be effectively screened. 1924.5 AGAPE CLEANERS AND LAUNDRY *707 sq. ft. as per staff comment #8 N/A as per staff comment #7 *Noncon.formities PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #93-267 TO: Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director FROM~ Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: Major Site Plan Modification - Agape Dry Cleaners DATE: November 29, 1993 The Public Works Department finds no problems at the site listed above and recommends that it be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board/Community Redevelopment Advisory Board. Eichorst Works Director RE/cr ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-361 TO: Tambri Heyden Acting Planning & Zoning Director FROM: James D. White, City Engineer P.~ DATE: December 3, 1993 RE: Agape Dry Cleaners Site Plan, Engineering Dept. Memo 193-343 The applicant has responded to Engineering Department Memo #93-343 and provided information and amended drawings as requested. I therefore recommend that processing of this application continue and lift the previous "hold" on the application. JDW/ck OEe m ~ 3. C/ ~-- BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-237 November 29, 1993 TO: Tambri Acting FROM: Al Newbold Deputy Building Official THRU: Don Jaeger Building 0 RE: TRC COMMENTS - SECOND REVIEW MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION AGAPE DRY CLEANERS - 521 N. FEDERAL HWY. It is our understanding that previous Building Department comments #2, #4, #5 and #6 are being addressed by other Technical Review Committee members. The remaining two comments can be met at permit time if the floor elevation meets code. The building must meet the Design Guidelines as approved by the Planning Department. ~/ Al Ne 01 AN : bh 001 ~ @i .. -- .. '";! 2 Ie') I U I - ,h 'u .._.,~ f. ..' .c, ';i~D ZONli~G DEPT. ... AGAPE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-343 TO: Tambri Heyden Acting Planning & Zoning Director Office of the City Engin~ t)U James D. White, P.E. ~ November 23, 1993 t FROM: DATE: RE: Technical Review Committee Comments Agape Site Plan Modification (Review of Amended Plans) Unresolved Staff Comments/Engineering Dept. Memo No. 93-308 City Engineer Comments DRAINAGE PLAN: 1. Hydraulic4conductivity K of 1.75 x 104 is assumed to be 1. 75 x 10- (Please correct). 2. The above K value is not in agreement with the K value provided by the lab report of "Testing Lab of the Palm Beaches, Inc.". Please identify and show correct value on plan sheet and calculations. 3. The formula for calculating exfiltration trench as shown is incorrect, see attached copy of correct method for South Florida Water Management District (S.F.W.M.D.) regulations. Please correct calculations on plan submission. 4. Catch basin detail shows 15" diameter pipe, drain field detail shows 18" diameter pipe. Please correct plan conflicts and show correct catch basin pipe sizes. 5. Depict upon plans all pavement materials, thicknesses, etc. 6. Depict upon plans all arrows and elevations to show drainage and flow path into swales #1, #2 & #3. 7. The L calculated does not derive from the correct equation and data. Please revise calculations accordingly. Deputy City Engineer Comments 1. The applicant has not resolved Engineering Dept. Memo No. 93-308, dated October 26, 1993 plan comment #2 which states "the applicant shall install...the posting of u.S. Highway #1 "No Parking" signage along either side of NE 5th tandards previously provided) .". ffi' " i ~ Engineering Dept. Memo No. 93-343 ~RC Comments/Agape Site Plan Modification November 23, 1993 Page #2 The Engineering Department for the City of Boynton Beach, Florida recommends that this plan be held in a state of abeyance and not be moved forward until such time as the applicant complies with required submission information, reference the resolution of the aforementioned Technical Review Committee comments. I.J~ ~ ~~.~"~0~ VIncent A. FInlZIo JDW:VAF/ck attachment cc: J. Scott Miller City Manager TYPICAL EXFIL TRATION TRENCH H2 UNSATURATED TRENC H PIPE COVER Du DEPTH S PERFORA TED PIPE DIAMETER T - - PIPE BED - Os - - TRENCH WIDTH CAR L = K(H2W + 2H 2Du - Ou2+ 2H20S) + (I.39XIO-4) WDu L= LENGTH OF TRENCH REQUIRED (FEET) C= RUNOFF COEFFICIENT (RATIONAL RUNOFF METHOD) A = CONTRIBUTING AREA (ACRES) R = ONE - HOUR DESIGN RAINFALL (INCHES) W = TRENCH WIDTH (FE ET) K = HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY (CFS/FT..:1.- FT.HEAD) Hz = DEPTH TO WATER TABLE (FEE T) Du = NON-SATURATED TRENCH DEPTH (FEET) Os = SATURATED TRENCH DEPTH (FEE n C-78 Fioure C-42 ~~~ 7~~ TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMORANDUM TO: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official William Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer Sgt. Mike Kirrman, Police Department John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Chief Field Insp. Harry Benoit, Gee & Jenson Vincent Finizio, Engineering Department FROM: Dorothy Moore, Zoning & Site Plan Reviewer DATE: October 21, 1993 RE: Technical Review Committee Meeting Tuesday, October 26, 1993 Please be advised that the Technical Review Committee will meet on Tuesday, October 26, 1993, at 8:30 A.M. in Conference Room "C" (West Wing) to discuss the folloWing: DISCUSSION 1. Review the following site plan for inter-departmental conflicts: a. Agape Dry Cleaners - Major Site Plan Modification For the subject site located at 521 North Federal Highway. fu/l. Plan Reviewer DM/jm cc: MEMO ONLY J. Scott Miller, City Manager City Commission (5) James D. White, City Engineer Don Jaeger, Building Official Ed Allen, Fire Chief Charles Frederick, Recreation & Parks D1rector Thomas Dettman, Police Chief John Guidry, Utilities Director Pete Mazzella, Assistant to Utilities Director Steve Campbell, Fire Department Bob Gibson, Public Works Central File Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director Mike Haag, Zoning and Site Development Administrator project File Chronological File A:TRCTUES.JM PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORfu~DUM NO. 94-097 SUBJECT: Al Newbold Deputy Building Official Michael Z. Haagfj>.2~~ Zoning & Site D Q ~ent Administrator April 14, 1994 Transmittal of Development orders TO: FROM: DATE: Accompanying this memorandum you will find documents regarding development plans that received final approval by the Planning & Development Board and/or city Commission. The following is a list of the proJects, type of request and the documentation t::-ansmitted: Chec~ers Drive-In Restaurant - conditional use/new site plan - copy of the 2nd reVlew plans copy of the staff report and comments copy of the written order signed by the Mayor copy of ~he November 16, 1993, City Commission minutes Checkers Drive-In Restaurant - parking lot variance - copy of the staff report and comments - copy of the written order signed by the Mayor - copy of the November 16: 1993, city Commission minutes Chec}:ers Drive-In Restaurant - community design plan appeal - copy of the staff report and comments ;::opy of the written order s1.gned by the Mayor copy of the November 15: 1993, City Commission minutes Super City Food & Discount - major site plan modification - copy of the 2nd review plans copy OI the staff report and comment3 copy of the November 16, 1993, City Commission minute3 Su?er city Food & Discount - parking lot variance - Copy ot the staff report and comments COP? of the written order signed by the Mayor copy of the November 16, 1993, City Commission minutes Harvey's Restaurant - parking lot variance staff report and comments written order slgned by the Mayor November 16, 1993, city Comnission ~inuteE - copy of the - ,::c'py of the - copy of the PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-299 TO: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director Jim White, P.E. city Engineer Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utility Dept. Chief Field Insp. Sgt. Mike Kirrman, Police Department John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Kevin allahan, Forester/Environmentalist FROM: Director DATE: November 19, 1993 RE: Second Review - Major Site Plan Modification Project Agape Dry cleaners Location N. W. corner of US #1 and N.E. 5th Ave. Applicant - James Hudson File No. 780 Attached is the amended site plan submittal for the above referenced development for your final review and recommendation. We would ask that you review this amended site plan documents to determine if the plans have been adjusted to satisfy comments made previously by your department. If the comments have been satisfied or if your comments can be met at time of building permit, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing. If your comments have not been met or must be met by correcting the site plan again, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing. Finally we would ask that you recommend to us if the plan should be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board/Community Redevelopment Advisory Board for review or held for further revisions by the applicant. All correspondence shall be received by the Planning and Zoning Department per the following: Please return your memo and the amended plans to the Planning and Zoning Department by 5:00 P.M. on November 30, 1993. If you should have any questions regarding this plan, please feel free to call Dorothy Moore at 6267 who is coordinating the review of this development. XC: (Memo Only) Don Jaeger Ed Allen Charlie Frederick Tom Dettman John Guidry Project File (original) Numbered File A: 2REVIEW. SP BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-210 October 19, 1993 To: Tarnbri Heyden, Acting Planning irector Via: Don Jaeger, Building Officia From: Al Newbold, Deputy Building Re: TRC COMMENTS 1st Review - Major Site Plan Modification Project - Agape Dry Cleaners Location - 521 N. Federal Hwy. The Building Department has reviewed the plans for the above referenced project and offers the following comments: 1. The site plan drawn by George Davis differs from the survey in that it includes a portion of Lots 2 and 3. This would require a Unity of Title and research on the balance of Lots 2 and 3 to ascertain whether use of part of these lots (75' X 34.5') creates other violations. Submittal requirements include a copy of a recent survey (the submitted survey is nearly six years old) . 2. An existing building is shown on Mr. Davis' plan located on an adjacent lot. This structure may need to be addressed for code compliance if the entire property is treated as one parcel. If not, cross parking and access agreements must be provided. 3. The window openings on the east side of the cleaners must comply with Table 600. Only show windows and store fronts are exempt. 4. If all of Lot 3 is not going to be a part of this proposed property, the landscaping should be provided on Agape's property unless an agreement between both property owners has been made. 5. Because the existing building is located on a zero lot line, the proposed addition would create an expansion of a nonconforming building which requires City approval under Appendix A, Section 6.E.7. (Non- conforming Structures). 6. Appendix A, Section 6.E.2 (Uses Prohibited) lists dry cleaning plants as a prohibited use. AN:mh AGAPE. TRC (407) 375-6372 MEMORANDUM Utilities No. 93-494 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Acting Planning and FROM: John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities DATE: November 29, 1993 SUBJECT: Agape Dry Cleaners, Second Review Staff has reviewed the above-referenced plan and offers no comment. It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. The plan will again be reviewed at the time of building permit for adherence to all City Codes and Specifications. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. /bks xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella File M E M 0 RAN DUM POLICE #93-190 TO: Ms. Tambri Heyden FROM: Sgt. M. Kirrmal1 DATE: December 3, 1993 REF: 2nd Review - Agape Dry Cleaners ME. Heyden, My comments were satisfied. The plans may proceed to the planning and development process. 711 Kirrm 1 MK/jb lill ! 698 m '--- RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM '93-486 TO: Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist ~~ Agape Dry Cleaners - 2nd Review FROM: RE: DATE: November 22, 1993 There are no existing tree issues for this site. Proceed as scheduled on the schedule as outlined. KH:ad ill ~ ~ ~ 2 2 1993 c.A"Yl'" PLANNING ANO 00 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: fn.o~r7~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-264 Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director Vince Finizio, Admin. Engineering Department Harry Beno~t, Gee & Jenson Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Dept. Chief Field Insp. Sgt. Mike Kirrman, Police Department John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Tambri J. Heyden, Acting Planning & Zo~g DirecM d~-() October 11, 1993 ~- SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES 1st Review - Major Site Plan Modification Project Agape Dry Cleaners Location 521 N. Federal Hwy. Applicant - James Hudson File No. 780 Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above referenced project. Site Plan Review approval for this project will be granted by the City Commission/Community Redevelopment Agency. To ensure that the project stays on line with the review time frame, I request that the plans and exhibits be reviewed and formal written comments transmitted to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department no later than 5:00 P.M. on October 25. 1993. Do not return plans and exhibits. Retain same for the review of the amended plans (2nd review). Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval: 1. Use the review standards specified in Part III, Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, site Plan Review, Section 8 of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments. 2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be sUbstantially complete based on the submittal requirements identified in Section 7 of the Site Plan Review Ordinance. However, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the reviewer through the Planning and Zoning Department. To: TRC Members Re: Planning & Zoning Memo, #93-264 Page Two of Two 3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the documents. 4. Technical Review Committee member (s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with other departmental improvements. 5. When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review specified. 6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memo, within the time frame stated above, to the Planning and Zoning Director stating that the plans are approved and they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and recommend the project be forwarded through the approval process. All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department for distribution to the applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memo. Dotty Moore will be the Planning and Zoning Department staff member coordinating the 1st review of the project. The Planning and Zoning Department will send the applicant a cover letter which incl~des the comment(s) and directions to amend the plans to comply with the comments and the procedures for resubmission. When the Planning and Zoning Department receives the amended plans, they will distribute the plans with a cover memo to all TRC Members for review and approval. Attachment xc: (Memo Only) Don Jaeger, Building Official Ed Allen, Fire Chief Charlie Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director Thomas Dettman, Police Chief John Guidry, utilities Director Project File (original) Numbered File A: lREVIEW. SP vi III. DEVELOPMENT PLANS C.3 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMEN cc: Bldg, Plan, Eng, Util Agenda Memoranaum tor November 16, 1993 city Commission Meeting TO: J. Scott Miller city Manager FROM: Tambri J. Heyden - ~' . ,.. c' " '-/ 1)< ,t'1> Acting Planning and zoningvbireQior DATE: November 8, 1993 SUBJECT: Dry Cleaners in the CBD Use Determination and fee waiver Introduction - Jim Hudson, owner of the property at 521 North Federal Highway, zoned central Business District (CBD), has requested a determination of whether a dry cleaning service with dry cleaning performed on premises, but limited to handling goods that are brought to the premises by retail customers, is an acceptable use in the CBn (see attached letter received November 5, 1993). Mr. Hudson is currently in the site plan approval process (a maj or modification) to convert the existing, vacant building ~, ct 521 North Federal Highway into the requested dry cleaning service.~~ ~ As part of the preapplication process, Mr. Hudson received ~ information from the city which encouraged him to proceed with ;-kJ, ~ preparing a formal site plan application. During the first round I~ of site plan comments, a comment was generated by the Building :T" - Department that dry cleaning plants are prohibited and that dry 4~crA!1 cleaning on. the p emises is not allowed in the CBD. ~~~ ~~ vip ['t -. - i ~ 14 Mr ~~;r~'I) ':'~I~ Through d1sc sions wi h the city Attorney, it was decided to place this matter before the City Commission for clarification and a use determination. Mr. Hudson is also requesting that the $150 use determination fee be waived. He says his justification is that he would not have proceeded with hiring an architect to draw a site plan if he had been told during the preapplication process that the use he is reques . _ not acce,Ptable. . _~c4L I"".;k. Gn...A.oI ...;~ . 4(--f/L. L -.;t/'lgo.,~, 11-, C6D --p~- u VI ~-'I'I#-r. Analvsis The C-2, C-3 and C-4 commercial? zoning districts .fot...~~l1.f specifically allow a "dry cleaning service, limited to handling 1.;,fL.~ goods that are brought to the premises by retail customers" and ~- "dry cleaning on the premises, limited to handling goods that are (1<Il'Yt brought to the premises by retail customers" is listed as a use requiring an environmental review permit. The M-1, Light Industrial, zoning district allows "uniform, towel, and linen supply services; industrial launderers; laundry and dry cleaning plants, excluding retail pick-up and drop-off on premises", subj ect to issuance of an environmental review permit. The CBD allows "coin-operated laundromats, dry cleaning pick-up, tailors and dressmakers, alteration and repair of clothing or clothing accessori s", but expressly prohibits "laundry or dry cleaning plants" P In addition, dry cleaning service and dry cleaning plants are defined under "Definition of terms" in the zoning code. W' respect to the comprehensive plan, the CBD falls under the ixed Use land use category which allows personal services. A '. conC1US.ion - The City Commission may take one 9f t. he following ,^/I action~t~regar~ to this request: ;;::Wt~<-Ite Clh, ~ ~~ r1) decide th~ requested use is not appropriate and was not ~~~ intended to be allowed in the CBD based on the CBn omission of '. ~wJ.vdrop-off" and "dry cleaning on premises"; or . ~ 2) decide that the requested use is appropriate and is a matter of interpretation that can made based on the M-1 definition of dry cleaning plants and the omission of "dry cleaning on premises" from the CBD list of prohibited uses. I TO: J. Scott Miller -2- November 8, 1993 If the city Commission determines that the requested use is appropriate in the CBD, it is advised that staff be directed to prepare an amendment to the zoning code for future clarification. This amendment would require forwarding to the Planning and Development Board for a determination of consistency with the comprehensive plan, prior to ordinance readings at the City Commission. Pursuant to the adopted fee schedul~~_~he cost for such amendments, after a use determination is m~~ iSA $250 to cover staff's preparation time and advertising. ~ ~ ~ ~_ tjh Attachments A:CBDDryCI .1 ..... ...-:'_..........1:-.-.. -........ ........ .",- ',".. .- .." . ,Lid A ~ n J)~ ('-!u-~U4 6lifJ3 d.~~&~ ~~ -?'--33C;'i- 8. . 'Y . ,,L:/~ ~: ~(JJ;i ~ '-6-p ~I U--a ~ hJJ - ~L c~.A ~v0 Lk/. ~J.. ~ ~,,'-" ~nw Qd ~l~ /J1~ ~ ~~ ~ ~.-- . ~.~ -. ~-6 k :C'7'JALkJ .j} ~ A . ~ ). J~ /hU-XZ -,;J.~~~~-;L{ ~~ :;~ ~~t4~ ~~~ ~b~ . '1 ~ /J~;) ~ 0-/. 0>;,1 ~#r~. ./.4 A,~ ~ HtJ~~~ ~~~ O-<J //1Le. aJ~a ..ei~. ~ . /J () -if ". 0 ~~~~ ~o ~ ~ /Jf-nU .-4.# ~ ~ ~~~t:Ut.A ~ (:J7 -etJ<L ~.u~.J'ni~ J:;-~ ;-/ ~,.~ ~.~ . ~~ ~ ~~ tJ.--L.. 01.1.-<-. ac-nt.- /Y ~~'. . ~~ ~ d ~ ::6 J,.... n1J &l /)lL/'-k1- Ae-.4J ~~ d~L y ~v~~. JL~ 4~L; ~ tDL ~ ~pJUUn<.M..4 ~<J, ~~ ~J ?4 +-nC /1 ~ (1J-<LZ;7IU1~ · '"" / -r- ' _ " /7 , 7J::- . _ /) , I- 11 - I tL ~ ~nL~ ?L~<...nU I '-... ~.4-"1~ ~ ' --"(t ~ ~-.d;; C!f&?VJ>>~;u) L4 /2LLe~ ---!)..La_<L4'(~ ..----- --.-..-- --..---..,- --- -'.. # ~,?4 ~ ~ . :d-VW-L, '-tI~.vY ~~;.J ~ ~ ~Si), k ffi ~ ~ -JJ~j} ~2~~~~~ ~J :;t~~.~~r~ ~ u<-- ~ VJ fl~J /--<-~ p.:~ ju ~~ ~ HL:U-J. -IJ J~ lUL c~fJ -t ~.) tL ;.iJc F;- <Y- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ eMu! ;tk~- ~' /la..- .. J+t1 ~ . Ii 7l~ /7f,.L , .. ~ j) iufJJ ~r . u:u :Ii;if ~0JtL~f ' . 1-t-.J L;r''- ~ _ ~ ~~WJ ~"-' ;;UM /1/LdLL-V f:L4JM ~<L ,t.~ ~c 7S ~~~~u t../f--RJ0 · fJ I U yc..-r--- L./ ~ ~~. /~-4{~ co. ... j:'rOm.. C-.2 g~,^,/~-hfo~s APPENDIX A-ZONING Sec. 8 capacity of not more than one (1) ton. All repair and service of vehicles shall be done within an enclosed building. .. dd. Print shops. B Drycleaning service, limited to handling goods that are brought to the premises by retail customers. ff. Private clubs. lodges. and fraternal organizations." gg. Drive-up, drive-through, or drive-in service for any of the retail uses or personal services listed uqder I.e. through 1.tT. above." Drive-up and drive-through facil- ities for financial institutions shall be a permitted use, however. hh. Art or recreational instruction. The following uses. provided that the gross floor area of such use does not exceed ten thousand (10.000) square feet: ii. Grocery, food, ice cream, confectionary, and health food stores; delicate8$ans, butcher shops and seafood stores, vegetable and fruit stores, convenience food stores, and bakeries; catering service.. . ii. General hardware store.. ' , kk. Restauranta, including serving of alcoholic beverages only in connection with the serving of meals. 11. Drive-through, drive-up, or drive-in restaurants." mm. Sundries, notions. and variety stores. : nn. Drug stores. 00. Clothing, clothing accessory, and shoe stores. pp. Lawn and garden supply stores. qq. Drive-up, drive-through or drive-in service for any of the retail uses or personal services listed under l.ii. through l.pp. above." Drive-up and drive-through fa- cilities for financial institutions shall be a ~ermitted use. however. All uses listed under I.e. thJ;Ough 1.qq. l'~ve shall specify the gross floor area on the application for an occupational license. Each retail store and acljacent stores or bays under the same ownership or control that are of a similar or related use shall be considered to be a single store for the purpose of computing floor area. . IA. Conditional uses allowed.: Those uses specified above which are followed by an asterisk (*) shall be deemed to be condi- Supp. No. 35 1919 "I' --........ ., : ..~i.,... . 1C:.OI',..___ -- :. :J:... ...... ~. I"~"'''-''~'''"~'''''''''<r.~.......~...,. -......~.... .. Sec. 8 -h-of'1 C-cZ !PPLAujd.-+t'ons BOYNTON ~E~ CODE tional uses, which may be considered and granted in ac- cordance with the procedures set forth in section 11.2 of Appendix A of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boyn. ton Beach, Florida. lB. Uses requiring an environmental review permit. Within any C.2 neighborhood commercial zoning district, no build- ing, structure, land or water, or any part thereof, shall be erected, altered, or used, in whole or in part, for any of the following specified uses, unless an environmental review permit is secured in accordance with the standards and procedures set forth in section 11.3: a. Automotive service stations, subject to the provision of 1.ec. above. b. Print shops. ~ Drycleaning on premises, limited to handling goods '-.:./ that are brought to the premises by retail customers. d. Any use listed under 6.B.1 or 6.B.lA, which uses, handles, stores, or displays hazardous materials, or which generates hazardous waste as, defined by 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 261. 2. Prohibited uses. Within any C-2 neighborhood commercial zoning district, no building, structure, land or water, or any part thereof, shall be erectea~ altered. or used, in whole or in part, for any of the following uses: a. Any use not specifically allowed in accordance with the list pf uses under I., lA., and lB., above. b. Any use which is either specifically allowed or prohib- ited in another zoning district, which is not speciflt cally allowed in accordance with the list of uses under 1., lA., and lB., above. c. Outdoor storage or display of any type. d. Sale of firearms or ammunition. e. Sale of fireworks. f. Temporary employment centers, operated on a walk- in basis. g. Any wholesale establishments, storage as a principal use, or off-premises storage, or distribution. h. Sa.le of alcoholic beverages, other than heer or ~ine. Supp. No. 35 1920 .. & IIY1 fv1-' 12.'fJu-I A--h ~Yl s Sec. 8 BOYNTON BEACH CODE (7) Print shops, photographic laboratories, commer. cial photography, commercial art, silk screening, @lithOgraPhY, typesetting, and blueprinting services. (8) Uniform, towel, and linen supply services; indus- trial launderers; laundry and dry-cleaning plants, excluding retail pickup and drop-off on premises; carpet and rug cleaning plants. (9) Tire recapping. (10) Building cleaning and janitorial services and swim. ming pool maintenance services, where such uses would be located within the minimum distance requirement specified in section 8.A.2. c. Storage, distribution, wholesale, and other uses, retail display and sales shall be prohibited unless specific. ally permitted below or elsewhere in this section. (1) Petroleum and petroleum products, including sol. vents and liquified petroleum gas; bulk or nonbulk storage, sales, or distribution. (2) Chemicals, pesticides, and herbicides, excluding bulk storage, bulk sales, or bulk distribution. (3) Bulk or nonbulk wholesale or retail sale of sol. vents and cleaning preparations, including (ormu. l~ting of cleaning preparations for sale on premises. (4) Industrial and medical gases; bottled or bulk st0r- age, sales or distribution, excluding chlorine, flu. orine, ammonia, hydrogen sulppide, sulphur diox. ide, or toxic gases. (5) Temporary amusement parks and rides, fain, car. nivals, circuses, and revivals, provided that all such uses shall have a minimum frontage of two hundred (200) feet on a collector or arterial road and the mejor access thereto, and that the dura- tion of any such use shall not exceed fourteen (14) consecutive days within any one.year period. d. Miscellaneous uses, as follows: (1) Any use which uses, handles, stores, or displays hazardous materials, or which generates hazard. ous waste, as defined by 40 Code of Federal Regu. lations, Part 261. Supp. No. 35 1934.6 ! -from Ce:>'O RejuJIJ...:f1'on S Sec. 6 BOYNTON BEACH CODE uu. Sidewalk sales, subject to approval by the com. munity redevelopment agency. Services: vv. Personal service establishments. ww. Printing, engraving, fine art studios, photofinish- ing service, photographic studios and laboratoriesf film and recording studios. xx. *Funeral homes, excluding crematoriums. C) Business machine service offices. zz: Coin-operated laundromats, dry cleaning pickup, tailors and dressmakers, alteration and repair of clothing or clothing accessories. Transportation: aaa. Public parking lots and garages. bbb. *Bus terminals and taxi stands. cCC. *Railroad passenger stations. ddd. · Automobile rental, limited to rental of new cars. eee. *Helistops. ftT. *Private parking lots and garages, where opere ated as a principal \1se._. . lA. Uses requiring environmental review permits. Any use listed under 6.E.l. which uses, handles, stores, or displays haze ardous materials, or which generates h~ardous waste, as defined by 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 261, shall require an environmental review permit in accordance with section 11.3 of these zoning regulations. i 2. Uses prohibited. Within the central business district, nc building, structure, land, or water, or any portion thereof, shall be used for any of the following uses: a. Any use not specifically allowed in accordance with section 6.E.!. above. b. Any use specifically prohibited in section 6.E.!. above. C. Adult entertainm~mt establishments.ud. Massage parlors. e. Laundry or dry cleaning plants; carpet or upholstery cleaning plant or service. Supp. No. 35 , 1924.2 -f;.On-1 tit. fu..re.. L~Vl e{ U~e... E/emen+ t:Jf Com.prehens;~ P/a-n Same as Low Density Residential, except that the maximum gross density shall be 10.8 dwelling units per acre. special High Density Residential: This land use category shall consist of residential areas assigned to this land use category in the coastal Management Element, and may be applied only in Coastal Area as designated in the Coastal Management Element. The uses allowed in this land use category shall be limited to, but shall not necessarily include, the following: Same as Low Density Residential, except that the maximum gross density shall be 20 dwelling units per acre. Office Commercial: ~his land use category shall consist of all C-1 Office and Professional commercial zoning districts, and any other zoning districts which may be established, including Planned Commercial Development zoning districts, which are similar in character to the C-1 district, provided that all of the abovementioned zoning districts are shown on the Future Land Use Map within the Office Commercial land use category. The uses allowed in this land use category shall be limited to, but shall not necessarily include, the following: Business, professional, and administrative offices; and financial institutions; funeral homes; places of worship; schools and instruction,' day-care centers, and educational institutions; museums; hospitals and other health care services, group homes, nursing homes and related health care facilities; s~clal and civic clubs and organizations; civic and community centers; limited retail and business services which are related to the above uses. ~ Local Retail Commercial: This land use category shall consist of all C-2 Neighborhood Commercial and C-3 Community Commercial zoning districts, and any other zoning districts which may be established, including Planned Commercial Development zoning districts, 24 r which are sim1:lar ln character to the C-2 or C-3 districts, provided that all of the abovementioned zoning districts are shown on the Future Land Use Hap within the Local Retail Commercial land use category. The uses allowed in this land use category shall be limited to, but shall not necessarily include, the following: All uses allowed in the office Commercial land use category, plus retail uses, personal services, and repair of consumer goods; wholesale ~of non-hazardous commodities; business services which are compatible with retail uses; entertainment, recreation facilities, amusements, attractions, and exposition halls; lodging facilities; marinas and. boat storage; passenger transportation facilities; temporary amusements, revival tents, and the like; also, high-density residential (maximum 10.8 dwellings units per acre), including mixed use developments. "* Mixed Use: This land use category shall consist of all CBD - Central Business District zoning districts and/or any zoning district(s) which may be established subsequent to the adoption of the Plan, provided that all of the abovementioned zoning districts are shown on the Future Land Use Map within the Mixed Use land use category. The uses allowed in this land use category shall be limited to, but shall not necessarily include the following: All uses located in the Local Retail Commercial land use category, plus all uses located in the- High Density Residential Land Use Category; however, residential and hotel/motel densities up to forty (40) dwelling units per acre are permitted. All land development located in the Mixed Use category shall be required to submit a plan which includes a single unified design for the project, and shall conform to any adopted design planes) for the area covered by the category. General Commercial: This land use category shall consist of all C-4 General Commercial zoning districts, and any 25 CHECKLIST The following list and information is provided as a checklist to ensure that the submittal of amended plans and documents is substantially complete for review. Turning in this list and the appropriate plans and documents will enable the submittal to be efficiently checked prior to being accepted by the Planning and Zoning Department. Project Name: Agape DryCleaner 1. Submit an amended Site Plan Review/Conditional Use application form that reflects the changes that were made as a result of amending the plans and documents to comply with the code of Ordinances and the Technical Review Committee comments. A copy of the original form with a distinguishable symbol identifying the change(s) may be submitted or a completed new form with the changes identified. It is the agent of the owners responsibility to notify the owner(s) of changes. If there are no changes required to be documented on the application form, a letter from the applicant stating same must be turned in with the amended submittal. 2. Submit twelve (12) assembled and complete sets of plans and documents, including surveys that show compliance with the Code of Ordinances and comments made by the Technical Review Committee. Two (2) of the sets shall have the appropriate legible raised seal and signature of the designer responsible for the drawing(s). plans and documents shall be assembled in twelve (12) individual complete packages with the title of the project on all pages and/or sheets and each page or sheet numerically numbered such as the following example: 1 of 3, 2 of 3, 3 of 3. 3. Submit color photographs of the buildings on the site that are to remain in their existing condition and photos of existing buildings that are located on the sites that abut the perimeter of the subject property. The minimum size is 8" by 10". Each photograph shall be labeled to identify the location of the existing structures with respect to the location of the proposed project. 4. Submit colored elevation view drawings - a colored duplicate copy of all drawings of the elevation views of each side of all buildings and signage associated with the project. The colored elevation views shall match the elevations shown in the documents that where submitted for site plan review. The applicable exterior surfaces as identified above shall be colored with the color name and associated color reference number identified. The type of exterior surface material shall be identified next to the associated color. The colored elevation drawings shall have compass direction or title of the side of the building identified. The title block of the original drawing shall be shown. The maximum size is 24" by 36". Do no submit on board of any kind. 5. Submit color samples as an example of the proposed colors. Each sample shall have attached a label that identifies the color by name and numerical/letter code from an established color chart. 6. Submit a 8 1/2" x 11" transparency of the landscape site plan .drawing to be used on an overhead projector at board meetings. MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 93 - 450 DATE: October 22, 1993 TO: Tambr~ Heyden, Acting Planninq and FROM: John A. Guidry, utilities Director SUBJECT: Agape Dry Cleaners - Major Site Plan Modification We offer the following comments on this project: 1) A reduoed pressure backflow preventer will be required on the water service to this building, to be installed between the water meter and the building in a protected area. (Sect. 26-107) We have no objection to this project being forwarded to the City Commission. Please refer any questions on this matter to Clyde "Skip" Milor of this office. JAG!PVM be: Peter Mazzella xc: Skip Milor File Asst. to the Director 0.4 hours / ~ r ~f.//~ v.J PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #93-216 TO: Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: Major Site Plan Review - Agape Dry Cleaners DATE: October 22, 1993 The above site is to be a can pickup, therefore a dumpster enclosure is not needed for this type of operation. I also believe that this is an incorrect address. If you have any questions please let me know. REier MEMORANDUM RE: Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning:& Zoninq Director John Wildner, Parks Superintendent ~ /0 - ~7-('.3 f- Site Plan Review - New Site Plan - 1st Review TO: FROM: DATE: Project: -AGAptE b~y C(.EAyVi~AS The Recreation and Parks Department has reviewed the above referenced project. There are no outstanding recreation related issues on this project. ,,~ @ U271R3 t ING AND ING DEPT. FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-285 WDC TO: Planning and Zoning Department FROM: Fire Department DATE: October 28, 1993 SUBJECT: TRC Site Plan AGAPE We have no objections to this plan. ~i=-D. ~!SH FPO I BOYNTON BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT WDC:CP TO: FROM: DATE: REF: MEMORANDUM POLICE #93-168 Tambri Heyden Acting Planning & Zoning Director Sgt. Michael Kirrman October 25, 1993 1st Review - Agape Cleaners Ms. Heyden, I have reviewed the plans and have the following comments: 1. Suggest placing a stop sign/bar at exit from parking area; 2. Suggest lighting for parking and rear of building. I have no further comments at this time. MK/jb 7!luic., ~ &~Ul Michael Kirrman / ,( MEMORANDUM TO: Tambri J. Heyden Acting Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Dorothy Moore Site Plans Reviewer DATE: November 4, 1993 RE: Site Plan Review - 1st Review Major Site plan Modification Agape Dry Cleaners The following comments are in response to the submittal of the site plan for the above-referenced project. The comments for the project will be discussed at the Technical Review Committee meeting, Tuesday, october 26, 1993. The site plan was reviewed for consistency with the review standards specified in Section 8 of Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Part III, Land Development Regulations of the Code of Ordinances. The applicant shall amend the drawings and documents to show compliance with the following comments: 1. Please submit a recent certified property survey for Lots 1, portion of 2, portion of 3 and Lot 4, Block 4, Roberts Addition. These subject properties are shown on the site plan and thus would require a current recorded Unity of Title. In lieu of a current recorded Unity of Title a cross parking and cross access agreement by all property owners must be provided. 2. Identify on the plans the existing and proposed use of the on-site structures. 3. There are inconsistencies between the "typical parking spaces" drawings and the "site plan" drawings. The dimensions do not match. Please correct these inconsistencies. 4. There are no traffic control devices shown on the site plans. Please identify by note/drawing/dimensions the driveway, directional arrows, stop bars and stop signs. 5. Please identify the location of the required parking lot site lighting on the landscape plan and specify on the drawings the average of one (1) foot candle @ ground level. Located to not reflect directly onto adjacent property. 6. Please identify on the landscape plans and specity on the drawings the pedestrian lighting designed to provide an average of three-quarters (3/4) footcandle at ground level. Pedestrian lighting shall be energy efficient metal halide. 7. Please identify on the plans the required pedestrian walkways. The walkways shall be in accordance with the Central Business District guidelines. (Minimum 61 width is recommended.) 8. Please identify the required exterior furnishing(s) on the landscape plans and speCify also on the drawings. (Example: seating, benches, garbage rec. etc.) 9. The required cross visibility rectangle on both sides of the driveway shall be identified on the landscape and site plans. The cross visibility allows a clear view between three (3) feet and six (6) feet above grade level. The rectangle dimensions are: fifteen (15') feet in length along the right-of-way and five (5') feet in width. The cross visibility shall be provided on both sides of the driveway intersecting the public right-of- way. AGAPE DRY CLEANERS PAGE 2 10. Provide a note on plans: shrubs and ground cover in landscaped parking areas shall be maintained so as to be no higher than three (3) feet within five (5') feet of a driveway. 11. Please correct the landscape plans to provide by note: "Hedges shall receive two (2") inch Melaleuca mulch." 12. The landscaping material that is shown on Lot 3 should be drawn and shown on Agape's property, unless it is existing. Then it should be identified as such on the plans. 13. An existing building as shown on the plans is situated partly on L1 and partly on L4 and is encroaching onto and over the property line onto the public right-of-way of North Federal Highway. The addition would create an expansion of a nonconforming structure. This shall require prior City approval as per Appendix A: 6.E. CBD Central Business District, 7. (Nonconforming Structures) 14. The proposed use, drycleaning on the premises, limited to handling of goods for retail customers, requires use determination by the City Commission. This use determination is scheduled to be heard by the City Commission at their November 16, 1993, at which time the Commission will make one of the following decisions: a) To allow the proposed use as an interpretation of the Code; b) Disallow the proposed use or; c) Direct staff to prepare an amendment to the Zoning Code to specifIcally allow the proposed use. The cost for the process involving steps a) or b) above is $150.00. If the Commission directs staff to amend the Zoning code, a separate $250.00 fee will be required. As discussed by phone on November 4, 1993, a letter describing the proposed use is needed by 5:00 p.m., Friday, November 5, 1993 to be scheduled for the November 16, 1993 commission review. 15. If the use is determined by the City Commission to be appropriate, then an Environmental Review permit should be applied for by submitting an application to the planning and Zoning Department. DM/jm A:AGAPE.JM " ~ , BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-210 October 19, 1993 From: Al Newbold, Deputy Building ~I To: Tambri Heyden, Acting' Planning Director Via: Don Jaeger, Building Official Re: TRC COMMENTS 1st Review - Major Site Plan Modification Project - Agape Dry Cleaners Location - 521 N. Federal Hwy. The Building Department has reviewed the plans for the above referenced project and offers the following comments: 1. The site plan drawn by George Davis differs from the survey in that it includes a portion of Lots 2 and 3. This would require a Unity of Title and research on the balance of Lots 2 and 3 to ascertain whether use of part of these lots (75' X 34.5') creates other violations. Submittal requirements include a copy of a recent survey (the submitted survey is nearly six yea~.f\ old) . 2. An existing building is shown on Mr. Davis' plan located on an adjacent lot. This structure may need to be addressed for code compliance if the entire property is treated as one parcel. If not, cross parking and access agreements must be provided. 3. The window openings on the east side of the cleaners must comply with Table 600. Only show windows and store fronts are exempt. 4. If all of Lot 3 is not going to be a part of this proposed property, the landscaping should be provided on Agape's property unless an agreement between both prope~ty owners has been made. 5. Because the existing building is located on a zero lot line, the proposed addition would create an expansion of a nonconforming building which requires City approval under Appendix A, Section 6.E.7. (Non- conforming Structures). 6. Appendix A, Section 6.E.2 (Uses Prohibited) lists dry cleaning plants as a prohibited use. AN:mh AGAPE.TRC ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-308 DATE: Tambri Heyden Acting Planning & zoning Director Office of the City Engineer~~ October 26, 1993 tJI TO: FROM: RE: Technical Review Committee Comments Agape Site Plan Modification City Engineer Comments My review of the subject site plan indicates the following needs to be furnished. 1. Complete drainage calculations 2. Retention calcLlations 3. Soil percolaticn calculations and soil report on data and source used as basis of calculations. 4. Descriptive information of or specifications of "Typar #3401 membrane". Deputy City Engineer Comments~ The following required improvements necessary to attain compliance with City code are as follows: 1. Installation of perimeter parking lot, pavement area and pedestrian walkway lighting in accordance with section 5-l42(a) and 5-142(b). Levels of illumination shall comply with City standards, specifically Section 5-142(g), appendix, Lighting Standards. 2. The applicant shall install required stop signs and directional arrows within this facility as well as the posting of US Hwy. #l "No Parking" signage along either side of NE 5th Avenue for a distance of approximately '(*) in either direction. FOOT standards. 3. The applicant shall revise plans to provide for a handicap parking stall which com21ies with the Department on Community Affairs Accessibility Manual. Section 5-l42(k), Handicap Requirements. The position of the 5' wide handicap access area as depicted upon plans appears to be along the passenger side of the depicted parking stall and it is recommended that the 12' wide stall be shifted east and the 5' wide access area be located along the west side of the stall in order to provide parking lot entry to individuals exiting the passenger side of vans, etc. (*) See attached DOT Index No. 17358 TRC Comments/Engineering Dept. Memo No. 93-308 October 26, 1993 Page #2 4. parking stalls along the south side of the parking facility are shown 16' in total length and shall be revised to conform with City codes which requires a parking stall to be 18' in length. Revise plans accordingly. Section 5-l42(l), Parking Lot Striping. 5. Repair with concrete the broken and avulsed concrete apron at Federal Highway (south corner is patched with asphalt). Incorporated herein and made a part hereof please find Mr. Harold Benoit, P.E. memo dated 10/25/93 regarding his comments generated during the initial review process for Agape Cleaners. The Office of the City Engineer has no objection(s) to this plan moving forward to the reviewing boards subject to full compliance with Technical Review Committee comments as provided. JDW:VAF/ck ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: DATE: Harry T. Benoit, City, P .E., City Engineer c:H. <t::::t3, October 25, 1993 RE: Agape Dry Cleaners, 521 N. Federal Highway Boynton Beach, Fl A review ot the site plan submission tor Agape Dry Cleaners, indicates that the following items need to be addressed: 1. Paving & parking are indicated beyond the property line ot this site. 2. Plan Dimensions are conflicting and inconsistent with the plan scale. 3. No grading is shown on the plans. 4. Drainage retention computations on the plan are insufficient to determine Code Compliance. 5. There is no indication of trash storage facilities. 6. Cross sections of surface retention swales have not been provided. 93~025/246 Ibf \\ _.~'.J""------ " t"" ~ a: V) n ._1 ,.~ 0 ~ ~'" Ll.. <x:. ~ LL=> ~ . \.lJ ~ 8.2 .-..... c:. ( , ~~ ~ ~ 0 ! a:: ~'" 3t O.S: ~ ~ ",a: 0 ~ <x:. "Ii ,,~'" " ~ a ~~ .... i=: u .~-;: ~1~ u ;l ~ ",Q=> U I.U C) Cl ~ " Q "'u CE V) ~ C) ~ i~'i 4; ~ VI ..: a:: ~ ~ ~ >- >- ~~ ....2: ! I- ~ c:: ~ ~.~'t;) " ~ .c1 0 V) lI..J ~ a:: ~ :. : '0 ... e~ .., " :00 ....>- ~~ I- <x:. T :00 ~ :l~ b ~ lI..J ~ a:: ~ ~';;;I i~", ~ .., 2:(J b ~ '::&; ~~ ..V> ..., ~ a: 11 <x:. l.lJ l; "'<t: 0"'" \I\~.2.S_~ ~.. ~ *~ ~lQ a a.. ~:::u..;.~~:; a.. :00 " ~ Q -J : * . . >- .. V> .. ~ ~\U .. <x:. \~\!i~t&.. l- '" :: .-i '" ct:1- e ~ ~ U 8 8 " ...:00 ~ ;;C u .... 1-2: .~- t-j/^::' '6 ~ l/l- .::i ;~goe.Cl- ~ --:-T. ~ >- 'a! 0 - '" ~ \.lJ u .r;. ~.- 'i ~ i~ :i g '~l <( a.. I ~ ~ ~ ~ -: t~ ~ ~ cO :::i~ \U " " on l:j"-l ~.~ a.. ~ V) !8'au&,,~~& 0. \ 0. ~%i ..., 2::::i ~ ~ ~ 0 >2~ ~i ':; - ~~aU~ I.U ~ V) r.. r.. - '.- 0. ~~ '- ~ ~ &,. ~~ ..til VI "f-e $ ~~iu.!tu >- ~ct= a ~ ~ Nw)":V; ..0 S ~ Vi " & V) ~ ....J <x:. ~ V) V) ao o ... a: 0 u '" ~ ! Ll.. ci V) '" ~ ::. c: ~ i : ~ ~ I.U ....J 0:: <( u it >- I- ~ (J ff o<!;' , ---""' I /I I I / I I I 1 1 I I - I , I \1 \ ,. \ \1\ \' , \ .'"..c, \ ! ~ \ ~ \ II "'\ \ \ ,\ \ \ \ \ 1 e \ ~ \- '" .!! 1 ~ .. c <; c o ~~ \~ ~l \i il ,,1! " V) ~ i=: u lI..J V) a:: lI..J I- ~ Q ~ ::i <( ~ ~ Ii) ~ o LL a:: o Ll.. ~ I- U CE l- V) lI..J a: ~ ~ ~ a: <( 0... ::!; ::::> ~ ~ S ~ " i '" .~ b 15I H~ uo,U U G.I'~ .c WI U ~~ ~ "go ~';C ~&. l!~ ~Q ~1! <>'" ~~ '" .!! ~ ~ ~ -l; I.U "'~ in b -'""".... ~ ",'" ... ~ >-", vt ~. . '" "" ::b l2 !l:.... 8'" e o ~ ~ I.U 'C .. .~ <5 ..: ....~ I- 2:(.) Qb\ I-ct: ~~ e:~ t30 a::~ ~:::i 2:<( i;22: a::~ ~Vi 2: ~~ :IE ~ ~ .. "", -'" ~.~ ..~ ~~ ." ",- g'~ '';:'<<:) "" ..... .,., i,g c..l:? " '" ""~ .~~ -.;.. ,,::> . .?t:, ~ ., > - . " ",'" .. g~ ~ .... ~ 0. <";).- E 4. '\:: "- '" .~ . ~] ~~ .s.~ , -I , i,':., ~~~=- .. ~ ~ a a: t- V> 0. ::;, OC :~ :;;'" .~~ ,,- g.2 .,., g~ ~.~ '- ~ 0'" ~:t: ~ 10 ~~ .0"" V> "".. ~~ g~ ,,<> ",.~ "'~ ,,'" 5c ~: VI '" 0 .... l- e '" ~ .. ~ o ~ c! 1 c5 \~i Q CO l ~, lU::!; .t'i a.. >- q::: a.. VI i!~ <( I- l;~~ U ~ i~: CS l.&.I "1 ~~ ~ ~::!; ..~~. <( IJ.J -, ..'lie J:: ~ ;~~. 0:: ...; N .~" .-i- -. \ ; r----;O :r-~' .0 "S ~ \ \ \V ~ \l,\\ Y I.U j 1.1 k ~ ~ '" 1'1 ~ ~ t \~\: 11\ 0'~~~ ! V\ .,.. <r: , :00 ~99 ~ t:: -~ " ~,; ~ ~~ ~~ a-~ -e~ a'" -~ $!~ ... g .; ;;: \. \ \L-- l ~\ \1' J \\, "'\ ~ I'! ~"'\ ~ \i \~ ' ~ ~\ \ J ",\\kJ .' "'" ':i j\ l / ~\ \ \ ~ ~\, / J\, ~ --I~' o \-:: \' / w ~ '" i / i ~ & \~\ ~\ ~ ,-~\ . ~'~'~ - ... _ - 5 ,mB r .. ";1 ., c " ~ I- ::::> u ~~ \ ~ '?' RECREATION Ii PAU MEMORANDUM '93-431 TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Tambri Heyden, Senior Planner Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Agape Dry Cleaners October 21, 1993 ~~~+ There are no existing tree concerns for this site. KH:ad 00 lli & ~ ~,Wi ~ ill SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT FOR COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD December 9, 1993 Project Name: Agape Cleaners and Laundry Applicant: James R. Hudson Agent: N/A Location: 521 North Federal Highway Land Use Plan Designation: Local Retail Commercial Zoning Designation: Central Business District Type of Use: Dry Cleaners Numbers of Unit: Two Square Footage: Building Addition First Building Second Building Total Square Feet 176 sq. ft. 1187 707 2070 Description of Property: James R. Hudson, as future of owner of the property, is requesting site plan approval to modify the site which is located at 521 North Federal Highway. The property consists of two existing structures, totalling 1894 square feet on a 0.16 acre site. The proposed modifications to the site iwll include adding 176 square feet of building area to the southwest side of the existing 1187 square foot building. The two existing buildings, which includes the building that will have the addition built on it, are currently vacant. The site is located in the Central Business District, Zoning District and the Design District - I Coastal village. The design and color of the new addition and the modification to the existing structure will be consistent with the requirements of the I Coast Village Architectural themes and design guidelines for the Central Business District. The number of required parking spaces required per code is four, including one (1) handicapped space. The landscape will be consistent with the required improvements specif ied in the Code. The landscaping shown on the southwest side of the property line is not located on the subject property. However, the code allows landscaping on adj acent property to satisfy landscaping requirements if said landscaping is in compliance with the Code. The acceptability of the off-site landscaping is field verified by the landscape inspector. If the off-site material is not acceptable, the applicant will have to modify the plan and provide the required continuous hedging. An existing building as shown on the plans is situated partly on Lot 1 and Lot 4 - BI 4 - Roberts addn, less east 35.0'. This building is encroaching onto and over the property line on to the public right-of-way of North Federal Highway. The addition would create an expansion of a non-conforming structure. This shall require prior City approval as per Appendix A: 6E CBD Central Business District 7. (Non-Conforming Structures) a, b, c & d. Page Two - Note: As per Appendix A: 6E CBD Central Business District 7 e. Development Standards ( 2 ) All sites will be brought into compliance with the zoning and development regulations of the City to the maximum extent possible. With this report is a data outline showing where the project complies and does not comply with the Appendix A - Zoning Sec. 6, E. CBD Central Business District, 3. Building and Site Regulations Review of Departmental Concerns: Please find attached the comments from all of the reviewing departments the Technical Review Committee recommends that the project proceed forward through the approval process subject to the following comments. Building Department Memorandum No. 93-237 Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 93-315 Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Department recommends that the Community Redevelopment Advisory Board find the site plan review acceptable and forward same to the City Commission with a recommendation to approve, subject to the applicant submitting working drawings to the Building Department that depict the project in compliance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances and the attached staff comments. c:staff PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-316 TO: Chairman and Members Community Redevelopment Advlsory Board (CRAB) FROM: Dottie Moore Zoning and SIte Plan Reviewer Tambri J. Heyden ~ Acting Plannlng and Zoning Director THRU: DATE: December 9, 1993 SUBJECT: Agape Cleaners and Laundry - Major Site Plan Modification File No. 780 STAFF REPORT Project Name: Agape Cleaners and Laundry Applicant: James R. Hudson Agent: N/A Location: 521 North Federal Highway Land Use Plan Designation: Local Retall Commercial Zoning Designatlon: Central BUSlness District Type of Use: Dry Cleaners (cleaning done on premises) and laundry Number of Units: N/A Total BUilding Gross Floor Area: Existing Commerclal Building Existing Residential Building Addition to Commercial Building Total 1187 sq. ft. 707 sq. ft. 176 Sq. ft. 2070 sq. ft. Description of Project: James R. Hudson, contract purchaser of the property at 521 North Federal Highway, is requesting approval of a major site plan modification. There are two existing structures on the 0.16 acre property, totalling 1,894 square feet. The proposed modifications include a 176 square foot addition to the southwest side of the existing commercial building, installation of a parking lot and landscaping. The number of parking spaces to be provided is six; four within the new parking lot and two for the existing residential building, as per code. Relative to landscaping, if the attached staff comments related to landscaping are addressed, the landscape plan will be consistent with city codes and regulations. It should be noted however, that the proposed number of trees and the foundation hedges shown along the north side of the existing commercial building are beyond the requirements of the landscape code. The property is located within the Coastal Village design district and since it is zoned CBD, proposed improvements are subject to the CBD Guidelines. In an attempt to comply with the Coastal Village design district architectural standards, the applicant is proposing to change the color of the bUilding and add architectural features and treatments (shutters, lattice, picket fencing, exterior lamps and multi-pane glass windows). However, unless the staff comments related to roof and wall elements are addressed, the proposed improvements do not meet the coastal Village design district / TO: Community Redevelopment Advisory Bd. -2- December 9, 1993 architectural standards. As discussed in the attached Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 93-315, comment 6 regarding enlargement of the nonconforming structure, the nonconformities that remain, despite the proposed improvements, include lot size, side yard setbacks and living area. All other zoning and development regulations (assuming staff comments are imposed and complied wIth) will be met. Side yard setbacks cannot be made conforming without removal of a portion of both the residential and the commercial building. If the living area were to be increased, there would not be enough 1 and area to meet the drainage, 1 andscaping and parking improvements proposed. The degree of nonconformity of the lot size will be reduced with the applicant's lntention to purchase, improve, and unIfy the title of all the lots on which the residential and commercial buildings are located. Therefore, it is the Planning and Zoning Department's opinion that the applicant will have complied with the zoning and development regulations, to the maximum extent posslble, and that this request is harmonious with the intent and purpose of the CBD, does not adversely affect the public interest and is not a detriment to the health, safety, and general welfare of residents and workers within the CBD. Review of Departmental Concerns: Attached are the comments from the reviewing departments. The Technical Review Committee recommends that the proJect proceed forward through the approval process, subj ect to the comments from the Building Department (Memorandum No. 93-237) and the Planning and Zoning Department (Memorandum No. 93-315). Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Department recommends that the Community Redevelopment Advisory Board recommend approval of Mr. Hudson's request and forward same to the Community Redevelopment Agency. Staff's recommendation is subj ect to the attached staff comments and to the applicant submitting working drawings to the Building Department that depict the proJ ect in compliance with the applicable City codes. A motion to approve should include flndlngs of fact that the waivers (nonconformities regarding lot area, llving area and side yard setbacks) will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of persons working or residing within the CBD and the walvers WIll result in additional bUSIness actlvity that is harmonious with the general intent and purpose of the CBD. tjh Attachments A:AgapeRep xc: Central File z FROM: PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-315 Tarnbri J. HeYden-nJ- Acting Planning and Zoning Director Dorothy Moore ~ zoning and Site Plans Reviewer TO: DATE: December 9, 1993 RE: Site Plan Review - 2nd review Major Site Plan Modification Project: Agape Cleaners and Laundry LOCATION: 521 North Federal Highway APPLICANT: James Hudson FILE NO.: 780 The amended plans for the above referenced project have been submi tted and reviewed. The following comments are either comments that were not satisfactorily corrected on the amended plans or that were generated as a result of the review of amended plans. All comments shall be corrected. However, it is acceptable to show compliance with the outstanding comments on the plans that are required to be submitted to the Building Department for permit review. The applicant must understand that the following comments are comments generated for site plan review and that additional comments may be forthcoming as a result of the review of the working drawings and documents submitted to the Building Department for permits. All permit documents are reviewed for compliance with the requirements specified in the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. 1. Identify on the plans the existing and proposed use of the on- site building structures. 2. Provide the dimensions and total square footage for all the buildings/structures on the site. 3. Provide elevation view drawings for the building on lots 2 and 3. 4. Indicate on the plans the vehicular access to the carport and the "open" concrete pad to be used for parking. 5. Please identify and show on the plans the site furnishings/ pedestrian amenities (e.g. bench, trash container) referenced in the CBD landscape code, Section 7.5-57 (1). j. 6. The existing building on lots 1 and 4 that encroaches the Federal Highway right-of-way is a nonconforming structure. Nonconforming structures may be enlarged, as proposed, subject to CRAB and CRA approval of the addition. Approval shall be reviewed against the criteria in Section 6.E.7.c. (1) - (4) and Section 6.E.7.e.(2) as follows: (1) That granting the application will not adversely affect the public interest. (2) Expansion will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of persons working or residing within the Central Business District. (3) Approval will to the maximum extent possible bring the building and the site upon which it is located into compliance with city regulations and will improve the physical appearance of the structure. (4) That the expansion will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the central business district. 3 -2- To: Tambri J. Heyden December 10, 1993 (2) All sites will be brought into compliance with the zoning and development regulations of the city to the maximum extent possible. The community redevelopment agency may grant relief from provisions of requirements of the zoning and development regulations of the city provided that they make specific findings of fact that the waiver will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of persons working or residing within the central business district and that the waiver will result in additional business activity that is harmonious with the general intent and purpose of the central business district. Since the criteria include bringing the building and site into compliance with the zoning and development regulations to the maximum extent possible, attached is an outline of the nonconformities of the structures, including which regulations are complied with based on the site plan proposed and staff comments. 7. Pursuant to Section G.E.3 of the Zoning Code, provide a note on the plans that all utility lines will be underground and any service equipment required above ground shall be effectively screened. 8. Provide on the plans the dimension of the height of the fixed canopy over the main entrance door on the north side of the building. Note: The minimum required height is 9.0'. 9. There is an inconsistency on the sectional view drawings and the colored elevation view drawings concerning the entry canopy. One plan identifies "asphalt shingles". The colored elevations show "wood shake" finished materials. Either material is icceptable within the Community Design Plan. 10. To show compliance with the Community Design Plan, Coastal Village District, roof material, extend the canopy shown on the north elevations of the plans to include the west, south and more of the north elevations. Note: The configuration and shape of what is presently shown is acceptable but needs to cover more of the structure to constitute a roof material. 11. To show compliance with the Community Design Plan wall element, add the diagonal wood board design shown on the north elevation of the plans to the south and west walls including the new addition. 12. Provide a detail sectional drawing showing the shutters on the east side of the building. Since the structure is nonconforming and building alterations cannot increase the extent to which a structure is nonconforming, the shutters will not be allowed to encroach any farther into the side setbacks. 13. Provide a detail sectional drawing showing the diagonal wood board on the east side of the building. If the board is encroaching into the setbacks it will have to be removed from the dra,ling for the reason stated in comment 12 above. 14. Provide a note on the landscape plans that the trees and groundcover will comply with the Community Design Plan landscape requirements. 4- -3- To: Tambri J. Heyden December 10, 1993 15. Provide and identify on the landscape plans the required 3.0' hedge on the west side of the accessway, between the parking space and N.E. 5th Avenue. Provide curbing at this location. 16. It is recommended that a 2.0' landscaped strip planted with a Coco Plum hedge be installed along the east side of the accessway in front (east side) of the parking space. curbing and a wheel stop will be required if the landscaping is installed. 17. Revise the note on the landscape legend to read: "Hedges to be planted eighteen 18" on center, 24" high with an 18" spread". Add note that trees shall have a seven foot (7.0') spread with a three (3") inch caliper at six (6") inches above grade and have six (6.0') feet of clear wood. 18. Please provide near the pedestrian entranceway on N.E. 5th Avenue a flowering tree, selected from the Community Design Plan Landscape Standards list of trees for the Coastal Village district. The CBD landscape code and CBD Guidelines refer to special entrance treatment and flowering trees. 19. To further the intent of special entrance treatments, it is recommended that groundcover be planted on the east side of the driveway. Groundcover species shall be selected from the Coastal Village species list of the community Design Plan landscape standards. 20. Indicate on the landscape plans the limits of the pervious/impervious areas on the west side of the property. 21. Revise lighting note on landscape plans to reflect the following: a. Site/Parking lot lighting shall provide an average of one (1) foot candle at ground level and be energy efficient, high pressure sodium. b. Pedestrian Lighting shall provide an average of three quarters (3/4) foot candles at ground level and be energy efficient, metal halide. 22. Provide and identify on the plans the "safe corner" intersection at N. E. 5th Avenue and North Federal Highway. Cross visibility within the safe corner shall be maintained at both sides at twenty (20.0') feet with landscaping maintained at a height between three (3.0) feet and six (6.0') feet. 23. Provide a note on the landscape planting specifications that "plant materials shall be Florida No. 1 or better as specified in the current "Grades and Standards for Nursery Plants". 5" -4- To: Tambri J. H~yden December 10, 1993 24. Due to a deficiency in back-up distance for the parking space along the west property line, it is recommended that the parking lot be redesigned in the following manner: a. Three (3) standard parking spaces, to be located along the south property line. b. One (1) handicapped parking space, with the access aisle on the passenger's (north) side, to be located along the western-most property line. c. One (1) parking space designated as the carport and one space located on the existing 9' x 18' concrete slab on the northwest side of the property. DM/cmc c:agape Attachment ~ Buildlng and site regulations. No building, structure, land. or water shall be erected. altered, enlarged. or used unless in conformance with the following regulations: Minimum lot frontage 75 f~t Minimum lot depth 100 feet 15,000 square feet 8 feet at first floor leveL None, at all other floors. 20 feet abutting adjacent pro- perties at first floor level. 8 feet abutting street or alley at first floor leveL None, at all all other floors. Minimum side yard None, for interior lot lines. 8 feet abutting street or alley at first floor leveL None. at all other floors. M'imYnum, waterfront yard Regardless or the orientation or the lot or parcel. an 8.foot setback shall be maintained from a buildi"'g or stractare ..and any Davigable water. -'Waterfront setb...... shall be m.IUSlm!d from the plol"l&t.l where the body at water fa under different awnership than the subject iAY~ liDe. and measured from the mean high water line if the body of water is under the same ownership as the subject property. )fi.,,;TnUDl lot area Minimum front yard ){;."iTnum rear yard M.YiYnum lot ,"",\;~.ge 75 per cent. 85 per cent for parking garages. ~ ..-iTnum structure height 45 feet. not to exceed 4 stories. Multiple-family dwelling unit deDSity ft"I.-iTnum 10.8 dwelling units per acre. Application of residential density to a parcel shall aot iupp. :fo. 33 192-\ 4 ? AGAPE CLEANERS AND LAUNDRY 81 feet 100 feet * 7276 Sinqle-Story 17.11 25.0' *6' encroachment on west side yard/.25'encroachment abutting Federal Highway MIA 33% 15.5' NIA *Nonconformities APPENDIX A-ZJNING Living area minimum per multiple-family dwelling unit Canopies and awnings Movable awnings over right-of-way Permanent structural projections from buildings Utility lines, mechanical equipment Supp. No. 22 Sec. 6 750 square feet. Canopies or awnings for pedestrian entrance ways, with at least 9 feet clear, may project to the property line in any required yard. Movable awnings may extend not more than 8 feet over a sidewalk in an adjacent right- of-way, provided such awning or IIIQ' part _ thereof shall maintain a clear height of 9 feet above the sidewalk. Such awnings extending over rights-of-way shall be moved or removed at the request of the city. Eaves, sills, belt course, cor. nices, pilasters, and other architectural features; gut. ters, chimneys, and mechani. cal equipment, may project not more than 3 feet into any required yard, provided that such structures are located within the property lines and conform to established cen- tral business district design guidelines. Utility lines shall be installed underground, and any service equipment required above ground shall be effectively screened. 1924.5 8 AGAPE CLEANERS AND LAUNDRY *707 sq. ft. as per staff comment #8 N/A as per staff comment #7 *Nonco.;nformities PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #93-267 TO~ "H'."Tambri""Heyden. .Acta.nq,~pl~nnirlg~'~&,1"ZOhit1.ti"'D:rreoEor:N'~ ',' FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: Major Site Plan Modification - Agape Dry Cleaners DATE: November 29, 1993 The Public Works Department finds no problems at the site listed above and reconunends that it be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board/Conununity Redevelopment Advisory Board. Eichorst Works Director REIer q - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-361 TO: Tambri Heyden Acting Planning & Zoning Director FROM: James D. White, City Engineer p "tPJ DATE: December 3, 1993 RE: Agape Dry Cleaners Site Plan, Engineering Dept. Memo 193-343 The applicant has responded to Engineering Department Memo #93-343 and provided information and amended drawings as requested. I therefore recommend that processing of this application continue and lift the previous "hold" on the application. JDW/ck 31&1 ~ 10 BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-237 November 29, 1993 TO: Tambri Heyden Acting Plann' THRU: Don Jaeger Building 0 f cial FROM: Al Newbold Deputy Building Official RE: TRC COMMENTS - SECOND REVIEW MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION AGAPE DRY CLEANERS - 521 N. FEDERAL HWY. It is our understanding that previous Building Department comments #2, #4, #5 and #6 are being addressed by other Technical Review Committee members. The remaining two comments can be met at permit time if the floor elevation meets code. The building must meet the Design Guidelines as approved by the Planning Department. ~/ Al Ne 01 AN : bh fD) rn @ f'-' ,~ Wr.:..,,~ L-__:-,-_,~ r: ." .e, ,\i~D ZONING DEPT. AGAPE /1 BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-210 October 19, 1993 To: Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning irector Via: Don Jaeger, Building Officia From: Al Newbold, Deputy Building Re: TRC COMMENTS 1st Review - Major Site Plan Modification Project - Agape Dry Cleaners Location - 521 N. Federal Hwy. The Building Department has reviewed the plans for the above referenced project and offers the following comments: 1. The site plan drawn by George Davis differs from the survey in that it includes a portion of Lots 2 and 3. This would require a Unity of Title and research on the balance of Lots 2 and 3 to ascertain whether use of part of these lots (75' X 34.5') creates other violations. Submittal requirements include a copy of a recent survey (the submitted survey is nearly six years old) . 2. An existing building is shown on Mr. Davis' plan located on an adjacent lot. This structure may need to be addressed for code compliance if the entire property is treated as one parcel. If not, cross parking and access agreements must be provided. 3. The window openings on the east side of the cleaners must comply with Table 600. Only show windows and store fronts are exempt. 4. If all of Lot 3 is not going to be a part of this proposed property, the landscaping should be provided on Agape's property unless an agreement between both property owners has been made. 5. Because the existing building is located on a zero lot line, the proposed addition would create an expansion of a nonconforming building which requires City approval under Appendix A, Section 6.E.7. (Non- conforming Structures). 6. Appendix A, Section 6.E.2 (Uses Prohibited) lists dry clean:ng plants as a prohibited use. AN:mh AGAPE. me 375-6372 /'A FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-285 WDC TO: Planning and zoning Department FROM: Fire Department DATE: October 28, 1993 SUBJECT: TRC site plan AGAPE We have no objections to this plan. 4i:~ID.~~SH FPO I BOYNTON BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT WDC:CP /3 '.... MEMORANDUM Utilities No. 93-494 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Acting Planning and FROM: John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities DATE: November 29, 1993 SUBJECT: Agape Dry cleaners, Second Review Staff has reviewed the above-referenced plan and offers no comment. It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. The plan will again be reviewed at the time of building permit for adherence to all City Codes and Specifications. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. /bks xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella File /4 M E M 0 RAN DUM POLICE #93-190 TO: Ms. Tambri Heyden FROM: Sgt. M. Kirrman DATE: December 3, 1993 REF: 2nd Review - Agape Dry Cleaners Ms. Heyden, My comments were satisfied. The plans may proceed to the planning and development process. s~!i: :!frm~U?/7~ MK/jb ill~ " C 6 19m m '---- /5 MEMORANDUM TO: Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning:& Zoninq Director John Wildner, Parks Superintendent ~ /0 - g)7-q 3 J- Site Plan Review - New Site Plan - 1st Review FROM: DATE: RE: Project: ..iJGAF~ bAt c(,,zV-lyV~~.s The Recreation and Parks Department has reviewed the above referenced proj ect. There are no outstanding recreation related issues on this project. o \Yl ~ @ (ft,'T 2 7 fgP3 + PlANNING AND NING DEPT. ..... /(0 RECREATION Ii PARK MEMORANDUM 193-486 TO: Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning Ii Zoning Director Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist f\(r~ Agape Dry Cleaners - 2nd Review FROM: RE: DATE: November 22, 1993 There are no existing tree issues for this site. Proceed as scheduled on the schedule as outlined. KH:ad illffi@~~: ID QA1't'"" PLANNING AND IN /7 \ .. \ . ',\ \ \ ----- /8 LOCATION MAP -AGAPE CLEANERS AND LAUNDRY ~ ,- ~ ., '~ !., III ... t :; IU ... c ~ 11 k o l.J ( - . ".. f I I I " ,.- ...:. .-- ~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-316 TO: Chairman and Members Community Redevelopment Advisory Board (CRAB) FROH: Dottie Moore Zoning and site Plan Reviewer Tambri J. Heyden ~ Acting Planning and Zoning Director THRU: DATE: December 9, 1993 SUBJECT: Agape Cleaners and Laundry - Major Site Plan Modification File No. 780 STAFF REPORT Project Name: Agape Cleaners and Laundry Applicant: James R. Hudson Agent: N/A Location: 521 North Federal Highway Land Use Plan Designation: Local Retail commercial Zoning Designatlon: Central Business District Type of Use: Dry Cleaners (cleaning done on premises) and laundry Number of Units: N/A Total Building Gross Floor Area: Existing Commercial Building EXisting Residential Building Addition to Commercial Building Total 1187 sq. ft. 707 sq. ft. 176 Sq. ft. 2070 sq. ft. Description of ProJect: James R. Hudson, contract purchaser of the property at 521 North Federal Highway, is requesting approval of a major site plan modification. There are two existing structures on the 0.16 acre property, totalling 1,894 square feet. The proposed modifications include a 176 square foot addition to the southwest side of the existing commercial building, installation of a parking lot and landscaping. The number of parking spaces to be provided is six; four within the new parking lot and two for the existing residential building, as per code. Relative to landscaping, if the attached staff comments related to landscaping are addressed, the landscape plan will be consistent with city codes and regulations. It should be noted however, that the proposed number of trees and the foundation hedges shown along the no~th side of the existing commercial building are beyond the requirements of the landscape code. The property is located within the Coastal Village design district and since it is zoned CBD, proposed improvements are subject to the CBD Guidelines. In an attempt to comply with the Coastal Village design district architectural standards, the applicant is proposing to change the color of the building and add architectural features and treatments (shutters, lattice, picket fencing, exterior lamps and multi-pane glass windows). However, unless the staff comments related to roof and wall elements are addressed, the proposed improvements do not meet the coastal Village design district / TO: Community Redevelopment Advisory Ed. -2- December 9, 19~3 architectural standards. As discussed in the attached Planning and Zoning Department Hemorandum No. 93-315, comment 6 regarding enlargement of the nonconforming structure, the nonconformities that remain, despite the proposed improvements, include lot size, side yard setbacks and living area. All other zoning and development regulations (assuming staff comments are imposed and complied with) will be met. Side yard setbacks cannot be made conforming without removal of a portion of both the residential and the commercial building. If the living area were to be increased, there would not be enough land area to meet the drainage, landscaping and parking improvements proposed. The degree of nonconformity of the lot size will be reduced with the applicant's intention to purchase, improve, and unif~ the title of all the lots on which the residential and commercial buildings are located. Therefore, it is the Planning and Zoning Department's opinion that the applicant will have complied with the zoning and development regulations, to the maximum extent possible, and that this request is harmonious with the intent and purpose of the CBD, does not adversely affect the public interest and is not a detriment to the health, safety, and general welfare of residents and workers within the CBD. Review of Departmental Concerns: Attached are the comments from the reviewing departments. The Technical Review Committee recommends that the proJect proceed forward through the approval process, subject to the comments from the Building Department (Memorandum No. 93-237) and the Planning and Zoning Department (Memorandum No. 93-315). Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Department recommends that the Community Redevelopment Advisory Board recommend approval of Mr. Hudson's request and forward same to the Community Redevelopment Agency. Staff's recommendation is subject to the attached staff comments and to the applicant submitting working drawings to the Building Department that depict the proj ect in compliance with the applicable City codes. A motion to approve should include findings of fact that the waivers (nonconformities regarding lot area, living area and side yard setbacks) will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of persons working or residing within the CBD and the waivers will result in additional business activity that is harmonious with the general intent and purpose of the CBD. tjh Attachments A:AgapeRep xc: Central File z FROM: PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-315 Tambr i J. Heyden '79-.4 Acting Planning and Zoning Director Dorotl.y Moore ~ Zoning and Site Plans Reviewer TO: DATE: December 9, 1993 RE: Site Plan Review - 2nd review Major Site Plan Modification Project: Agape Cleaners and Laundry LOCATION: 521 North Federal Highway APPLICANT: James Hudson FILE NO.: 780 The amended plans for the above referenced project have been submitted and reviewed. The following comments are either comments that were not satisfactorily corrected on the amended plans or that were generated as a result of the review of amended plans. All comments shall be corrected. However, it is acceptable to show compliance with the outstanding comments on the plans that are required to be submitted to the Building Department for permit review. The applicant must understand that the following comments are comments generated for site plan review and that additional comments may be forthcoming as a result of the review of the working drawings and documents submitted to the Building Department for permits. All permit documents are reviewed for compliance with the requirements specified in the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. 1. Identify on the plans the exi~ting and proposed use of the on- site building structures. 2. Provide the dimensions and total square footage for all the buildings/structures on the site. 3. Provide elevation view drawings for the building on lots 2 and 3. 4. Indicate on the plans the vehicular access to the carport and the "open" concrete pad to be used for parking. 5. Please identify and show on the plans the site furnishings/ pedestrian amenities (e.g. bench, trash container) referenced in the CBD landscape code, Section 7.5-57 (1). j. 6. The existing building on lots 1 and 4 that encroaches the Federal Highway right-of-way is a nonconforming structure. Nonconforming structures may be enlarged, as proposed, subject to CRAB and CRA approval of the addition. Approval shall be reviewed agaillst the criteria in Section 6.E.7.c. (1) - (4) and Section 6.E.7.e.(2) as follows: (1) That granting the application will not adversely affect the public interest. (2) Expansion will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of persons working or residing within the Central Business District. (3) Approval will to the maximum extent possible bring the building and the site upon which it is located into compliance with city regulations and will improve the physical appearance of the structure. (4) That the expansion will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the central business district. 3 -2- To: Tambri J. Heyden December 10, 1993 (2) All sites will be brought into compliance with the zoning and development regulations of the city to the maximum extent possible. The communi ty redevelopment agency may grant relief from provisions of requirements of the zoning and development regulations of the city provided that they make specific findings of fact that the waiver will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of persons wor\ing or residing within the central business district and that the waiver will result in additional business activity that is harmonious with the general intent and purpose of the central business district. Since the criteria include bringing the building and site into compliance with the zoning and development regulations to the maximum extent possible, attached is an outline of the nonconformities of the structures, including which regulations are complied with based on the site plan proposed and staff comments. 7. Pursuant to Section G.E.3 of the Zoning Code, provide a note on the plans that all utility lines will be underground and any service equipment required above ground shall be effectively screened. 8. Provide on the plans the dimension of the height of the fixed canopy over the main entrance door on the north side of the building. Note: The minimum required height is 9.0'. 9. There is an inconsistency on the sectional view drawings and the colored elevation view drawings concerning the entry canopy. One plan identifies "asphalt shingles". The colored elevations show "wood shake" finished materials. Either material is xcceptable within the Community Design Plan. 10. To show compliance with the Community Design Plan, Coastal Village District, roof material, extend the canopy shown on the north elevations of the plans to include the west, south and more of the north elevations. Note: The configuration and shape of what is presently shown is acceptable but needs to cover more of the structure to constitute a roof material. 11. To show compliance with the Community Design Plan wall element, add the diagonal wood board design shown on the north elevation of the plans to the south and west walls including the new addition. 12. Provide a detail sectional drawing showing the shutters on the east side of the building. Since the structure is nonconforming and building alterations cannot increase the extent to which a structure is nonconforming, the shutters will not be allowed to encroach any farther into the side setbacks. 13. Provide a detail sectional drawing showing the diagonal wood board on the east side of the building. If the board is encroachinq into the setbacks it will have to be removed from the dra.ling for the reason stated in comment 12 above. 14. Provide a note on the landscape plans that the trees and groundcover will comply with the Community Design Plan landscape requirements. 4 -3- To: Tambri J. Heyden December 10, 1993 15. Provide and identify on the landscape plans the required 3.0' hedge on the west side of the accessway, between the parking space and N.E. 5th Avenue. Provide curbing at this location. 16. It is recommended that a 2.0' landscaped strip planted with a Coco Plum hedge be installed along the east side of the accessway ih front (east side) of the parking space. curbing and a wheel stop will be required if the landscaping is installed. 17. Revise the note on the landscape legend to read: "Hedges to be planted eighteen 18" on center, 24" high with an 18" spread". Add note that trees shall have a seven foot (7.0') spread with a three (3") inch caliper at six (6") inches above grade and have six (6.0') feet of clear wood. 18. Please provide near the pedestrian entranceway on N.E. 5th Avenue a flowering tree, selected from the Community Design Plan Landscape Standards list of trees for the Coastal Village district. The caD landscape code and CBD Guidelines refer to special entrance treatment and flowering trees. 19. To further the intent of special entrance treatments, it is recommended that groundcover be planted on the east side of the driveway. Groundcover species shall be selected from the Coastal Village species list of the Community Design Plan landscape standards. 20. Indicate on the landscape plans the limits of the pervious/impervious areas on the west side of the property. 21. Revise lighting note on landscape plans to reflect the following: a. Site/Parking lot lighting shall provide an average of one (1) foot candle at ground level and be energy efficient, high pressure sodium. b. Pedestrian Lighting shall provide an average of three quarters (3/4) foot candles at ground level and be energy efficient, metal halide. 22. Provide and identify on the plans the "safe corner" intersection at N. E. 5th Avenue and North Federal Highway. Cross visibility wi thin the safe corner shall be maintained at both sides at twenty (20.0') feet with landscaping maintained at a height: between three (3.0) feet and six (6.0') feet. 23. Provide a note on the landscape planting specifications that "plant materials shall be Florida No. 1 or better as specified in the current "Grades and Standards for Nursery Plants". 5" -4- To: Tambri J. H~yden December 10, 1993 24. Due to a deficiency in back-up distance for the parking space along the west property line, it is recommended that the parking lot be redesigned in the following manner: a. Three (3) standard parking spaces, to be located along the south property line. b. One (1) handicapped parking space, with the access aisle on the passenger's (north) side, to be located along the western-mJst property line. c. One (1) parking space designated as the carport and one space located on the existing 9' x 18' concrete slab on the northwest side of the property. DM/cmc c:agape Attachment ~ Buildlng and site regulations. No building, structure. land. or water shall be erected. altered. enlarged. or used unless in conformance with the following regulations: Minimum lot frontage 75 f~t Minimum lot depth 100 feet Ml"hY'lUD1 lot area 15,000 square feet 8 feet at first floor level. None, at all other floors. 20 feet abutting adjacent pr0- perties at first floor level. 8 feet abutting street or alley at first floor leveL None. at all all other floors. Min..imum side yard None. for interior lot lines. 8 feet abutting street or alley at first floor leveL None, at all other floors. . Minimum waterfront yard RegarcUess of the orientation of the lot or parcel. an S.foot setback shall be maintained from a building or stractare ..and any Davigable water. -- Watufront setbfJ"lro. shall be lIuusured. from the p1"~ t.) where the body of water W under different ownership than the subject ~~,,~ty Une. and measured from the mean high water Une if the body of water is under the same ownership lIS the subject property. Minimum front yard M;Y'I;'I"I'Ium rear yard ~bYi'l"l'lum lot IOU n:u...ge 75 per cent. 85 per cent for parkiq prages. Mu:imum st:rw:ture height 45 feet. not to uc:eed " stories. Multiple-family dwelling unit density ftUIYi'l"l'lWD 10.S dwelling units per acre. Application of residential density to a parcel shall aot II~ :io. S3 192-' ~ 7 AGAPE CLEANERS AND LAUNDRY 81 feet 100 feet * 7276 Sinqle-Story 17.1' 25.0' *6' encroachment on west side yard/.25'encroachment abutting Federal Highway N/A 33% 15.5' N/A *Nonconformities AGAPE CLEANERS AND LAUNDRY APPENDIX A-Z"JNING Sec. 6 Living area minimum per multiple-family dwelling unit Canopies and awnings Movable awnings over right-of-way Permanent structural projections from buildings Utility lines, mechanical equipment Supp. No. 22 750 square feet. *707 sq. ft. Canopies or awnings for pedestrian entrance ways, with at least 9 feet clear, may project to the property line in any required yard. as per staff corrunent #8 Movable awnings may extend not more than 8 feet over a sidewalk in an adjacent right- of-way, provided such awning or &IQ" part _ thereof shall maintain a clear height of 9 feet above the sidewalk. Such awnings extending over rights-of-way shall be moved Jr removed at the request of the city. N/A Eaves, sills, belt course, cor- nices, pilasters, and other architectural features; gut- ters, chimneys, and mechani- cal equipment, may project not more than 3 feet into any required yard, provided that such structures are located within the property lines and conform to established cen. tral business district design guidelines. as per staff corrunent #7 Utility lines shall be installed underground, and any service equipment required above ground shall be etTectively screened. 1924.5 *Nonco:n.formi ties 8 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM *93-267 TO: .'w, -.. -Tambri:'"Heyden. .Act:i.nlii,pfannlrigi.?&'", zon:i..h~'oDfrec€oit-.".-~ FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: Major Site Plan Modification - Agape Dry Cleaners DATE: November 29, 1993 The Public Works Department finds no problems at the site listed above and recommends that it be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board/Community Redevelopment Advisory Board. Eichorst Works Director RE/cr q - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-361 TO: Tambri Heyden Acting Planning & Zoning Director FROM: James D. White, City Engineer p'lfbJ DATE: December 3, 1993 RE: Agape Dry Cleaners Site Plan, Engineering Dept. Memo 193-343 The applicant has responded to Engineering Department Memo #93-343 and provided information and amended drawings as requested. I therefore recommend that processing of this application continue and lift the previous "hold" on the application. JDW/ck 3gB ~ OEe 10 BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-237 November 29, 1993 TO: Tambri Heyden Acting Plann' g Director FROM: Al Newbold Deputy Building Official THRU: Don Jaeger Building 0 f cial RE: TRC COMMENTS - SECOND REVIEW MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION AGAPE DRY CLEANERS - 521 N. FEDERAL HWY. It is our understanding that previous Building Department comments #2, #4, #5 and #6 are being addressed by other Technical Review Committee members. The remaining two comments can be met at permit time if the floor elevation meets code. The building must meet the Design Guidelines as approved by the Planning Department. ~F/ Al Ne 01 AN : bh fD) ~ @ 1-' - ;~ Uor::-:,~ L-.._:----__~ r: .- .e,i\iW ZGNlliG OEPT. AGAPE II To: Via: From: Re: BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-210 October 19, 1993 Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning irector Al Newbold, Deputy Building Don Jaeger, Building Officia TRC COMMENTS 1st Review - Major Site Plan Modification Project - Agape Dry Cleaners Location - 521 N. Federal Hwy. The Building Department has reviewed the plans for the above referenced project and offers the following comments: 1. The site plan drawn by George Davis differs from the survey in that it includes a portion of Lots 2 and 3. This would require a Unity of Title and research on the balance of Lots 2 and 3 to ascertain whether use of part of these lots (75' X 34.5') creates other violations. Submittal requirements include a copy of a recent survey (the submitted survey is nearly six years old) . AN:mh AGAPE. TRC 2. An existing building is shown on Mr. Davis' plan located on an adjacent lot. This structure may need to be addressed for code compliance if the entire property is treated as one parcel. If not, cross parking and access agreements must be provided. 3. The window openings on the east side of the cleaners must comply with Table 600. Only show windows and store fronts are exempt. 4. If all of Lot 3 is not going to be a part of this proposed property, the landscaping should be provided on Agape's property unless an agreement between both property owners has been made. 5. Because the existing building is located on a zero lot line, the proposed addition would create an expansion of a nonconforming building which requires City approval under Appendix A, Section 6.E.7. (Non- conforming Structures). 6. Appendix A, Section 6.E.2 (Uses Prohibited) lists dry clean~ng plants as a prohibited use. 375-6372 /').. FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-285 WDC TO: Planning and zoning Department FROM: Fire Department DATE: october 28, 1993 SUBJECT: TRC site Plan AGAPE We have no objections to this plan. k I~ !Jf)~ WILL~AH D. CAVANAUGH FPO I BOYNTON BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT HDC:CP /3 '..... MEMORANDUM Utilities No. 93-494 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Acting Planning and FROM: John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities DATE: November 29, 1993 SUBJECT: Agape Dry Cleaners, Second Review staff has reviewed the above-referenced plan and offers no comment. It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. The plan will again be reviewed at the time of building permit for adherence to all City Codes and Specifications. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. jbks xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella File /1 M E M 0 RAN DUM POLICE #93-190 TO: Ms. Tambri Heyden FROM: sgt. M. Kirrman DATE: December 3, 1993 REF: 2nd Review - Agape Dry Cleaners Ms. Heyden, My comments were satisfied. The plans may proceed to the planning and development process. "fri- III fu~il~ Sgt M. Kirrrn I Ml\/jb ,. c '00 ill I 6 1993 ....-- /S" MEMORANDUM TO: Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning:& Zoninq Director John Wildner, Parks Superintendent ~ /0 - g)7-q 3 J- Site Plan Review - New Site Plan - 1st Review Project: ..iJGAF~ bAy C(.,ZV-lyVi2"~.s FROM: DATE: RE: The Recreation and Parks Department has reviewed the above referenced project. There are no outstanding recreation related issues on this project. D\Yl~ @ oor 2 7 fg~!J :1- PlANNING AND ZONING DEPT. .." /(0 RECREATION Ii PARK MEMORANDUM 193-486 TO: Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist f\(r~ Agape Dry Cleaners - 2nd Review FROM: RE: DATE: November 22, 1993 There are no existing tree issues for this site. Proceed as scheduled on the schedule as outlined. KH:ad ill ffi ~ ffi! ~ 1~ ill QA1't'"" PLANNING AND IN /7 \ .. \ . ;\ " ----- /8 LOCATION MAP AGAPE CLEANERS AND LAUNDRY ~ ,- ~ " III ... t :; ------- .....---- IU ... c ~ 11 k o l.J . : ~ I- ,. . , '. ( .. ~ .... ,- - , .. ~ . '- , '- - ,;. j~!; :~:: :"~:; I :: :~ :.-- --..:.; .= ;~ ':' /l._;/~:;-::~"";-::"j'::-:~:r::' - (~!/~'o /'1 1/8 H~__'''~_'} i:~: "1111 j .: 0 -400. 800 FE~T :[~ll 1~N.,oI " ,. - PROJEC'f 'l'ITLE: DESCRIPTION: 'l'YPE: DATE REC'D: 'l'RACKING LOG - ~l'l\,E PLAN REV.lEW SUBMl'l"!'AL , \ /I C. ~ft;. j)!?y C (c;~,.J~~ oltlSTiN6 iJtJlL6J~ - \ \ N~~_ SITE PLAN \ ~ MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION J':!L..s1-5~.3 AMOUNT: I 7.:91. "D RECEIPT NO.: dbr'l'/ FILENO.: P" 730 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TWELVE (12) SETS SUBMITTED: COLORED ELEVATIONS REC'O: y~ Nt.> (Plans shall be pre-assembled. The Planning & zoning Dept. will number each sheet of their set. The planning Dept. set will be used to check the remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match.) * ~ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * APPLICATION & SUBMITTAL: DATE: ACCEPTED ---DENIED DATE: DATE OF LETTER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES: 2nd SUBMIT'I'AL ACCEPTED DENIED DATE: DATE: DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER: REVIEWER'S NAME: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * (Label TRC Departments on each set of plans) -ree - /~r;/'i3 DATE AND MEMO NUMBER OF MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW. RETURN DATE: /Op.~/ 'I 3 # . DATE SENT: /OftJ/Q3 , , MEMO NUMBER: 93 -~,,, 1st REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED MEMO # / DATE / "c" ~/II.."'~~$ 9.3-,J.jo / 10/");/'13 / j<:....s ~~~~tl ~ /~~r/fJ ~ ty~ / 9.1- 'f~ / I~q) /-11E-_ PLANS Utile No P . W . AI 0 Parks ~ Fire ~ Police r~ MEMO # / DATE / "c" PLANS 93-'t~ / /oj.)~7] / Vt.( Planninl} y..~ '3 -.;)/fo / I~ -i?1 /~ Building ~o / ~.....~ '7 / ~...s Engineer,c/'li ~o 3 - r.;s, I v!J.is / Engineer Alo tl3-/I,B iID;-~~ /~ Forester ft:s ) TYPE OF VARIANCE(S) DATE OF MEETING: DATE OF LETTER SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS: (Aesthetic Review App., dates of board mtgs. & checklist sent out w/ comments NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID: DATE 12 COMPLETE SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW: (Must be assembled. Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents) COLORED ELEVATIONS REC I D: ---LJ,Iov. /8 /9Q3 .I MEMO DATE SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM 2nd REV~W. "\ SENT: N()&I. 19 I '4f~ MEMO #: 1 - do- 9<1 "J 2nd REVIEW RECOMMENDATION/DENIAL RETURN DATE: N()tJ. '10 1"1- ~ . util . ,P.W. Parks Fire ~ Police PLANS MEMO # /iiiTE /"RLD" PLANS MEMO # Jlc,5 Cf.~-'f7'1_/ . 1 Planning YIf:& q3-d.b, /. ~ 0/3/r 'Building ;/6~ q?, -~~n / /,Enginee:r; JJtIGJ 93 -: 3'1'1 / / 'lEngineer ~ ~~:.. '93 -.11/3 Y6S 13 - 190 / /"./lp/~.? / !< .Forester YeS f'S - ~8G. , DATE /"R/J.)ll LETTER TO APPLICANT REGARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS PLACED AT THE PROPERTY DATE SENT/SIGNS INSTALLED: SCHEDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD CC/CRA DATE APPROVAL LETTER SENT: A: '1'RACKING. SP '. " . '" :~ , ~, ,> - ' \. \ ----- --- ----- ,_._~~ ~,_..--