REVIEW COMMENTS
fJv<fiX 7~
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #93-321
FROM:
J. Scott Miller
Ci ty Manager r-_
Tambri J. Heyden J~- Qd/d,dh... ,
Acting Planning and Zoning ~~~- -
TO:
DATE:
December 16, 1993
RE:
Agape Cleaners and Laundry - File No. 780
Major site Plan Modification (Addition)
Please place the above-referenced item on the City Commission
(sitting as the Community Redevelopment Agency) agenda for
December 21, 1993 under Development Plans, Non-Consent Agenda
( CRA) .
DESCRIPTION: Jim Hudson, agent and contract purchaser of the
property located within the CBD at 521 North Federal Highway
(southwest corner of North Federal Highway and N.E. 5th Avenue)
is requesting approval of a major site plan modification to allow
construction of a 176 square addition to the existing commercial
building on site. Other improvements include construction of a
four space parking lot, landscaping and building modifications
including a color change from white to gray; the addition of egg
shell colored shutters, diagonal wood board panels, lattice, and
picket fencing; the addition of exterior building-mounted lamps
and multi-pane glass windows; and the addition of pale yellow
awning/roof structures. The building modifications are proposed
to meet the Coastal Village Design district.
RECOMMENDATION: The community Redevelopment Advisory Board
(CRAB) unanimously recommended approval of this request subject
to all staff comments (Building Department Memorandum #93-237 and
Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum #93-315) with the
exception of comment #7, #12 and #13 of planning and Zoning
Department Memorandum #93-315. The consensus of the CRAB was
that the utility lines should not have to be relocated
underground, since the buildings are existing (comment #7).
Also, they felt that any architectural features the applicant is
proposing to beautify the building should be allowed, despite the
fact that they may encroach setbacks and increase the degree of
nonconformity of the commercial structure (comment #12 and #13).
The CRAB's motion included a finding of fact that the recommended
waivers to codes relative to underground utilities and setback
encroachments and to lot size, side yards and living area, will
not be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of persons
working or residing within the CBD and will result in additional
business activity that is harmonious with the general intent and
purpose of the CBD.
TJH/jm
Att.
A:AGAPE.JM
,.
<
"
TO:
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-315
Tambri J. Heyden '71:4-
Acting Planning and Zoning Director
Dorothy Moore~
zoning and Site Plans Reviewer
FROM:
DATE:
December 9, 1993
RE:
Site Plan Review - 2nd review
Major Site Plan Modification
Project: Agape Cleaners and Laundry
LOCATION:
521 North Federal Highway
APPLICANT: James Hudson
FILE NO.: 780
The amended plans for the above referenced project have been
submi tted and reviewed. The following comments are either comments
that were not satisfactorily corrected on the amended plans or that
were generated as a result of the review of amended plans. All
comments shall be corrected. However, it is acceptable to show
compliance with the outstanding comments on the plans that are
required to be submitted to the Building Department for permit
review. The applicant must understand that the following comments
are comments generated for site plan review and that additional
comments may be forthcoming as a result of the review of the
working drawings and documents submitted to the Building Department
for permits. All permit documents are reviewed for compliance with
the requirements specified in the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances.
1. Identify on the plans the existing and proposed use of the on-
site building structures.
2. Provide the dimensions and total square footage for all the
buildings/structures on the site.
3. Provide elevation view drawings for the building on lots 2 and
3 .
4. Indicate on the plans the vehicular access to the carport and
the "open" concrete pad to be used for parking.
5. Please identify and show on the plans the site furnishings/
pedestrian amenities (e.g. bench, trash container) referenced
in the CBD landscape code, Section 7.5-57 (1). j.
6. The existing building on lots 1 and 4 that encroaches the
Federal Highway right-of-way is a nonconforming structure.
Nonconforming structures may be enlarged, as proposed, subject
to CRAB and CRA approval of the addition. Approval shall be
reviewed against the criteria in section 6.E.7.c. (1) - (4) and
Section 6.E.7.e.(2) as follows:
(1) That granting the application will not adversely affect the
public interest.
(2) Expansion will not be detrimental to the health, safety,
and general welfare of persons working or residing within
the Central Business District.
(3) Approval will to the maximum extent possible bring the
building and the site upon which it is located into
compliance with city regulations and will improve the
physical appearance of the structure.
(4) That the expansion will be in harmony with the general
intent and purpose of the central business district.
-2-
To: Tambri J. Heyden
December 10, 1993
(2) All sites will be brought into compliance with the zoning
and development regulations of the city to the maximum
extent possible. The community redevelopment agency may grant
relief from provisions of requirements of the zoning and
development regulations of the city provided that they make
specific findings of fact that the waiver will not be
detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of
persons working or residing within the central business
district and that the waiver will result in additional
business activity that is harmonious with the general
intent and purpose of the central business district.
Since the criteria include bringing the building and site into
compliance with the zoning and development regulations to the
maximum extent possible, attached is an outline of the
nonconformities of the structures, including which regulations are
complied with based on the site plan proposed and staff comments.
7. Pursuant to Section 6. E. 3 of the Zoning Code, provide a note on
the plans that all utility lines will be underground and any
service equipment required above ground shall be effectively
screened.
8. Provide on the plans the dimension of the height of the fixed
canopy over the main entrance door on the north side of the
building. Note: The minimum required height is 9.0'.
9. There is an inconsistency on the sectional view drawings and
the colored elevation view drawings concerning the entry
canopy. One plan identifies "asphalt shingles". The colored
elevations show "wood shake" finished materials. Either
material is acceptable within the Community Design Plan.
10. To show compliance with the Community Design Plan,
Coastal Village District, roof material, extend the canopy
shown on the north elevations of the plans to include the
west, south and more of the north elevations. Note: The
configuration and shape of what is presently shown is
acceptable but needs to cover more of the structure to
constitute a roof material.
11. To show compliance with the Community Design Plan wall
element, add the diagonal wood board design shown on the
north elevation of the plans to the south and west walls
including the new addition.
12. Provide a detail sectional drawing showing the shutters
on the east side of the building. Since the structure is
nonconforming and building alterations cannot increase the
extent to which a structure is nonconforming, the shutters will
not be allowed to encroach any farther into the side setbacks.
13. Provide a detail sectional drawing showing the diagonal
wood board on the east side of the building. If the board
is encroaching into the setbacks it will have to be removed
from the drawing for the reason stated in comment 12 above.
14. Provide a note on the landscape plans that the trees and
groundcover will comply with the Community Design Plan
landscape requirements.
-3-
-3-
To: Tambri J. Heyden
December 10, 1993
15. Provide and identify on the landscape plans the
required 3.0' hedge on the west side of the accessway,
between the parking space and N.E. 5th Avenue. Provide
curbing at this location.
16. It is recommended that a 2.0' landscaped strip planted with a
Coco Plum hedge be installed along the east side of the
accessway in front (east side) of the parking space. Curbing
and a wheel stop will be required if the landscaping is
installed.
17. Revise the note on the landscape legend to read:
"Hedges to be planted eighteen 18" on center, 24"
high with an 18" spread".
Add note that trees shall have a seven foot (7.0') spread with
a three (3") inch caliper at six (6") inches above grade and
have six (6.0') feet of clear wood.
18. Please provide near the pedestrian entranceway on N.E. 5th
Avenue a flowering tree, selected from the Community Design
Plan Landscape Standards list of trees for the Coastal
Village district. The CBD landscape code and CBD Guidelines
refer to special entrance treatment and flowering trees.
19. To further the intent of special entrance treatments, it is
recommended that groundcover be planted on the east side of
the driveway. Groundcover species shall be selected from
the Coastal Village species list of the Community Design Plan
landscape standards.
20. Indicate on the landscape plans the limits of the
pervious/impervious areas on the west side of the property.
21. Revise lighting note on landscape plans to reflect the
following:
a. Site/Parking lot lighting shall provide an
average of one (1) foot candle at ground level and be
energy efficient, high pressure sodium.
b. Pedestrian Lighting shall provide an average
of three quarters (3/4) foot candles at ground level and be
energy efficient, metal halide.
22. Provide and identify on the plans the "safe corner"
intersection at N. E. 5th Avenue and North Federal Highway.
Cross visibility within the safe corner shall be maintained at
both sides at twenty (20.0') feet with landscaping maintained
at a height: between three (3.0) feet and six (6.0') feet.
23. Provide a note on the landscape planting specifications
that "plant materials shall be Florida No. 1 or better as
specified in the current "Grades and Standards for Nursery
Plants".
-4-
To: Tambri J. Heyden
December 10, 1993
24. Due to a deficiency in back-up distance for the parking space
along the west property line, it is recommended that
the parking lot be redesigned in the following manner:
a. Three (3) standard parking spaces, to be located along the
south property line.
b. One (1) handicapped parking space, with the access aisle
on the passenger's (north) side, to be located along the
western-most property line.
c. One (1) parking space designated as the carport and one
space located on the existing 9' x 18' concrete slab on
the northwest side of the property.
DM/cmc
c:agape
Attachment
. .
B uildlng and site regulD.tion.s. No building. structure, land.
or water shall be erected" altered. enlarged. or used unless
in conformance with the following regulations:
Minimum lot frontage 75 feet
Minimum lot depth 100 feet
Minim1m1 lot area
15,000 square feet
a feet at first floor level.
None, at all other floors.
M;~ift'lum rear yard 20 feet abutting adjacent pr0-
perties at first floor leveL a
feet abutting street or alley at
first floor level. None, at all
all other floors.
Minimum side yard None, for interior lot lines.
a feet abutting street or alley
at first floor leveL None, at
all other floors.
-
Minimum waterfnm.t yard Regardless of the orientation
of the lot or parcel. an a-foot
setback shall be maintained
from a bui1~;~g or st:rw:ture
_:~d any Davigahle water.
Waterfront setb...lP. shall be
measured from the ~u~1.7
where the body of water W
UDder ctifrerent ~
than the subject i'~u~ liDe.,
and measured from the meaD
high water line if the body of
water is under the same
ownership as the subject
property.
Mi~i1"l'l1m1 front yard.
M.~ft'lum lot cov~age 75 per cent.
85 per cent for parking
prages.
M.'Pift'lum st:n1cture height 4S feet. not to exceed. 4
stories.
Multiple-family clwelliq
unit aeasity ""'.~""WD
10.8 dwelling units per acre.
Application of residential
density to a parcel shall not
iq~ ~o. .53
19:H~
AGAPE CLEANERS AND LAUNDRY
81 feet
100 feet
* 7276
Sinqle-Story 17.1'
25.0'
*6' encroachment on west
side yard/.25'encroachment
abutting Federal Highway
NIA
33%
15.5'
N/A
*Nonconformities
APPENDIX A-Z'JNING
Living area minimum per
multiple-family dwelling
unit
Canopies and awnings
Movable awnings over
right-of-way
Permanent structural
projections from buildings
Utility lines, mechanical
equipment
Supp. No. 22
Sec. 6
750 square feet.
Canopies or awnings for
pedestrian entrance ways,
with at least 9 feet clear, may
project to the property line in
any required yard.
Movable awnings may extend
not more than 8 feet over a
sidewalk in an adjacent right-
of-way, provided such awning
or 8111' part _ thereof shall
maintain a clear height of 9
feet above the sidewalk.
Such awnings extending over
rights-of-way shall be moved
or removed at the request of
the city.
Eaves, sills, belt course, cor-
nices, pilasters, and other
architectural features; gut.
ters, chimneys, and mechani-
cal equipment, may project
not more than 3 feet into any
required yard, provided that
such structures are located
within the property lines and
conform to established cen-
tral business district design
guidelines.
Utility lines shall be installed
underground, and any service
equipment required above
ground shall be effectively
screened.
1924.5
AGAPE CLEANERS AND LAUNDRY
*707 sq. ft.
as per staff comment #8
N/A
as per staff comment #7
*Noncon.formities
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #93-267
TO: Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director
FROM~ Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ: Major Site Plan Modification - Agape Dry Cleaners
DATE: November 29, 1993
The Public Works Department finds no problems at the site listed
above and recommends that it be forwarded to the Planning and
Development Board/Community Redevelopment Advisory Board.
Eichorst
Works Director
RE/cr
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-361
TO: Tambri Heyden
Acting Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
James D. White,
City Engineer
P.~
DATE: December 3, 1993
RE: Agape Dry Cleaners Site Plan, Engineering Dept. Memo 193-343
The applicant has responded to Engineering Department Memo #93-343
and provided information and amended drawings as requested. I
therefore recommend that processing of this application continue
and lift the previous "hold" on the application.
JDW/ck
OEe
m
~
3.
C/
~--
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-237
November 29, 1993
TO:
Tambri
Acting
FROM:
Al Newbold
Deputy Building Official
THRU:
Don Jaeger
Building 0
RE:
TRC COMMENTS - SECOND REVIEW
MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION
AGAPE DRY CLEANERS - 521 N. FEDERAL HWY.
It is our understanding that previous Building Department
comments #2, #4, #5 and #6 are being addressed by other Technical
Review Committee members. The remaining two comments can be met
at permit time if the floor elevation meets code. The building
must meet the Design Guidelines as approved by the Planning
Department.
~/
Al Ne 01
AN : bh
001 ~ @i .. -- .. '";!
2 Ie') I U I
- ,h 'u
.._.,~
f. ..' .c, ';i~D
ZONli~G DEPT.
...
AGAPE
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-343
TO:
Tambri Heyden
Acting Planning & Zoning Director
Office of the City Engin~ t)U
James D. White, P.E. ~
November 23, 1993
t
FROM:
DATE:
RE: Technical Review Committee Comments
Agape Site Plan Modification (Review of Amended Plans)
Unresolved Staff Comments/Engineering Dept. Memo No. 93-308
City Engineer Comments
DRAINAGE PLAN:
1. Hydraulic4conductivity K of 1.75 x 104 is assumed to be
1. 75 x 10- (Please correct).
2. The above K value is not in agreement with the K value provided
by the lab report of "Testing Lab of the Palm Beaches, Inc.".
Please identify and show correct value on plan sheet and
calculations.
3. The formula for calculating exfiltration trench as shown is
incorrect, see attached copy of correct method for South Florida
Water Management District (S.F.W.M.D.) regulations. Please
correct calculations on plan submission.
4. Catch basin detail shows 15" diameter pipe, drain field detail
shows 18" diameter pipe. Please correct plan conflicts and show
correct catch basin pipe sizes.
5. Depict upon plans all pavement materials, thicknesses, etc.
6. Depict upon plans all arrows and elevations to show drainage and
flow path into swales #1, #2 & #3.
7. The L calculated does not derive from the correct equation and
data. Please revise calculations accordingly.
Deputy City Engineer Comments
1. The applicant has not resolved Engineering Dept. Memo No. 93-308,
dated October 26, 1993 plan comment #2 which states "the applicant
shall install...the posting of u.S. Highway #1 "No Parking" signage
along either side of NE 5th tandards previously
provided) .".
ffi'
" i
~
Engineering Dept. Memo No. 93-343
~RC Comments/Agape Site Plan Modification
November 23, 1993
Page #2
The Engineering Department for the City of Boynton Beach, Florida
recommends that this plan be held in a state of abeyance and not
be moved forward until such time as the applicant complies with
required submission information, reference the resolution of the
aforementioned Technical Review Committee comments.
I.J~ ~ ~~.~"~0~
VIncent A. FInlZIo
JDW:VAF/ck
attachment
cc: J. Scott Miller
City Manager
TYPICAL EXFIL TRATION TRENCH
H2 UNSATURATED
TRENC H PIPE COVER
Du DEPTH S
PERFORA TED
PIPE DIAMETER
T
-
- PIPE BED
-
Os -
-
TRENCH WIDTH
CAR
L = K(H2W + 2H 2Du - Ou2+ 2H20S) + (I.39XIO-4) WDu
L= LENGTH OF TRENCH REQUIRED (FEET)
C= RUNOFF COEFFICIENT (RATIONAL RUNOFF METHOD)
A = CONTRIBUTING AREA (ACRES)
R = ONE - HOUR DESIGN RAINFALL (INCHES)
W = TRENCH WIDTH (FE ET)
K = HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY (CFS/FT..:1.- FT.HEAD)
Hz = DEPTH TO WATER TABLE (FEE T)
Du = NON-SATURATED TRENCH DEPTH (FEET)
Os = SATURATED TRENCH DEPTH (FEE n
C-78
Fioure C-42
~~~ 7~~
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMORANDUM
TO:
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
William Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Sgt. Mike Kirrman, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Chief Field Insp.
Harry Benoit, Gee & Jenson
Vincent Finizio, Engineering Department
FROM:
Dorothy Moore, Zoning & Site Plan Reviewer
DATE:
October 21, 1993
RE:
Technical Review Committee Meeting
Tuesday, October 26, 1993
Please be advised that the Technical Review Committee will meet on
Tuesday, October 26, 1993, at 8:30 A.M. in Conference Room "C" (West
Wing) to discuss the folloWing:
DISCUSSION
1. Review the following site plan for inter-departmental
conflicts:
a. Agape Dry Cleaners - Major Site Plan Modification
For the subject site located at 521 North Federal
Highway.
fu/l.
Plan Reviewer
DM/jm
cc: MEMO ONLY
J. Scott Miller, City Manager
City Commission (5)
James D. White, City Engineer
Don Jaeger, Building Official
Ed Allen, Fire Chief
Charles Frederick, Recreation & Parks D1rector
Thomas Dettman, Police Chief
John Guidry, Utilities Director
Pete Mazzella, Assistant to Utilities Director
Steve Campbell, Fire Department
Bob Gibson, Public Works
Central File
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director
Mike Haag, Zoning and Site Development Administrator
project File
Chronological File
A:TRCTUES.JM
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORfu~DUM NO. 94-097
SUBJECT:
Al Newbold
Deputy Building Official
Michael Z. Haagfj>.2~~
Zoning & Site D Q ~ent Administrator
April 14, 1994
Transmittal of Development orders
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Accompanying this memorandum you will find documents regarding
development plans that received final approval by the Planning &
Development Board and/or city Commission. The following is a
list of the proJects, type of request and the documentation
t::-ansmitted:
Chec~ers Drive-In Restaurant - conditional use/new site plan
- copy of the 2nd reVlew plans
copy of the staff report and comments
copy of the written order signed by the Mayor
copy of ~he November 16, 1993, City Commission minutes
Checkers Drive-In Restaurant - parking lot variance
- copy of the staff report and comments
- copy of the written order signed by the Mayor
- copy of the November 16: 1993, city Commission minutes
Chec}:ers Drive-In Restaurant - community design plan appeal
- copy of the staff report and comments
;::opy of the written order s1.gned by the Mayor
copy of the November 15: 1993, City Commission minutes
Super City Food & Discount - major site plan modification
- copy of the 2nd review plans
copy OI the staff report and comment3
copy of the November 16, 1993, City Commission minute3
Su?er city Food & Discount - parking lot variance
- Copy ot the staff report and comments
COP? of the written order signed by the Mayor
copy of the November 16, 1993, City Commission minutes
Harvey's Restaurant - parking lot variance
staff report and comments
written order slgned by the Mayor
November 16, 1993, city Comnission ~inuteE
- copy of the
- ,::c'py of the
- copy of the
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-299
TO: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
Jim White, P.E. city Engineer
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utility Dept. Chief Field Insp.
Sgt. Mike Kirrman, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin allahan, Forester/Environmentalist
FROM: Director
DATE: November 19, 1993
RE: Second Review - Major Site Plan Modification
Project Agape Dry cleaners
Location N. W. corner of US #1 and N.E. 5th Ave.
Applicant - James Hudson
File No. 780
Attached is the amended site plan submittal for the above referenced
development for your final review and recommendation.
We would ask that you review this amended site plan documents to determine if
the plans have been adjusted to satisfy comments made previously by your
department.
If the comments have been satisfied or if your comments can be met at time of
building permit, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing.
If your comments have not been met or must be met by correcting the site plan
again, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing.
Finally we would ask that you recommend to us if the plan should be forwarded
to the Planning and Development Board/Community Redevelopment Advisory Board
for review or held for further revisions by the applicant. All correspondence
shall be received by the Planning and Zoning Department per the following:
Please return your memo and the amended plans to the Planning and Zoning
Department by 5:00 P.M. on November 30, 1993.
If you should have any questions regarding this plan, please feel free to
call Dorothy Moore at 6267 who is coordinating the review of this
development.
XC: (Memo Only)
Don Jaeger
Ed Allen
Charlie Frederick
Tom Dettman
John Guidry
Project File (original)
Numbered File
A: 2REVIEW. SP
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-210
October 19, 1993
To:
Tarnbri Heyden, Acting Planning irector
Via:
Don Jaeger, Building Officia
From:
Al Newbold, Deputy Building
Re:
TRC COMMENTS
1st Review - Major Site Plan Modification
Project - Agape Dry Cleaners
Location - 521 N. Federal Hwy.
The Building Department has reviewed the plans for the above
referenced project and offers the following comments:
1. The site plan drawn by George Davis differs from the
survey in that it includes a portion of Lots 2 and 3.
This would require a Unity of Title and research on the
balance of Lots 2 and 3 to ascertain whether use of
part of these lots (75' X 34.5') creates other
violations. Submittal requirements include a copy of a
recent survey (the submitted survey is nearly six years
old) .
2. An existing building is shown on Mr. Davis' plan
located on an adjacent lot. This structure may need to
be addressed for code compliance if the entire property
is treated as one parcel. If not, cross parking and
access agreements must be provided.
3. The window openings on the east side of the cleaners
must comply with Table 600. Only show windows and
store fronts are exempt.
4. If all of Lot 3 is not going to be a part of this
proposed property, the landscaping should be provided
on Agape's property unless an agreement between both
property owners has been made.
5. Because the existing building is located on a zero lot
line, the proposed addition would create an expansion
of a nonconforming building which requires City
approval under Appendix A, Section 6.E.7. (Non-
conforming Structures).
6. Appendix A, Section 6.E.2 (Uses Prohibited) lists dry
cleaning plants as a prohibited use.
AN:mh
AGAPE. TRC
(407) 375-6372
MEMORANDUM
Utilities No. 93-494
TO: Tambri J. Heyden
Acting Planning and
FROM: John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilities
DATE: November 29, 1993
SUBJECT: Agape Dry Cleaners, Second Review
Staff has reviewed the above-referenced plan and offers no
comment. It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through
the review process.
The plan will again be reviewed at the time of building permit
for adherence to all City Codes and Specifications.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact
Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404.
/bks
xc:
Clyde "Skip" Milor
Peter Mazzella
File
M E M 0 RAN DUM
POLICE #93-190
TO:
Ms. Tambri Heyden
FROM:
Sgt. M. Kirrmal1
DATE:
December 3, 1993
REF:
2nd Review -
Agape Dry Cleaners
ME. Heyden,
My comments were satisfied. The plans may proceed to the planning
and development process.
711
Kirrm 1
MK/jb
lill !
698
m
'---
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM '93-486
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist ~~
Agape Dry Cleaners - 2nd Review
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
November 22, 1993
There are no existing tree issues for this site. Proceed as
scheduled on the schedule as outlined.
KH:ad
ill
~ ~ ~
2 2 1993
c.A"Yl'"
PLANNING ANO
00
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
fn.o~r7~
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-264
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
Vince Finizio, Admin. Engineering Department
Harry Beno~t, Gee & Jenson
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Dept. Chief Field Insp.
Sgt. Mike Kirrman, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Tambri J. Heyden, Acting Planning & Zo~g DirecM
d~-()
October 11, 1993 ~-
SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES
1st Review - Major Site Plan Modification
Project Agape Dry Cleaners
Location 521 N. Federal Hwy.
Applicant - James Hudson
File No. 780
Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above
referenced project. Site Plan Review approval for this project
will be granted by the City Commission/Community Redevelopment
Agency. To ensure that the project stays on line with the review
time frame, I request that the plans and exhibits be reviewed and
formal written comments transmitted to the Director of the Planning
and Zoning Department no later than 5:00 P.M. on October 25. 1993.
Do not return plans and exhibits. Retain same for the review of
the amended plans (2nd review).
Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a
comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain
Technical Review Committee approval:
1. Use the review standards specified in Part III, Land
Development Regulations, Chapter 4, site Plan Review, Section
8 of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments.
2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be
sUbstantially complete based on the submittal requirements
identified in Section 7 of the Site Plan Review Ordinance.
However, if the data provided to meet the submittal
requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process
the project based on the review standards or the documents
show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections
should be requested by the reviewer through the Planning and
Zoning Department.
To: TRC Members
Re: Planning & Zoning Memo, #93-264
Page Two of Two
3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is
incorrectly depicted on the documents.
4. Technical Review Committee member (s) shall identify in their
comments when the plans depict or when the location and
installation of their departmental required improvements may
conflict with other departmental improvements.
5. When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of
his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code
section may be included in their review comments with the name of
the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review
specified.
6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward
a memo, within the time frame stated above, to the Planning and
Zoning Director stating that the plans are approved and they do
not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and
recommend the project be forwarded through the approval process.
All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted to the Director
of the Planning and Zoning Department for distribution to the
applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer
on this memo. Dotty Moore will be the Planning and Zoning Department
staff member coordinating the 1st review of the project.
The Planning and Zoning Department will send the applicant a cover
letter which incl~des the comment(s) and directions to amend the plans
to comply with the comments and the procedures for resubmission. When
the Planning and Zoning Department receives the amended plans, they
will distribute the plans with a cover memo to all TRC Members for
review and approval.
Attachment
xc: (Memo Only)
Don Jaeger, Building Official
Ed Allen, Fire Chief
Charlie Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director
Thomas Dettman, Police Chief
John Guidry, utilities Director
Project File (original)
Numbered File
A: lREVIEW. SP
vi III. DEVELOPMENT PLANS
C.3
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMEN
cc: Bldg, Plan, Eng, Util
Agenda Memoranaum tor
November 16, 1993 city Commission Meeting
TO: J. Scott Miller
city Manager
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden - ~' . ,.. c' " '-/ 1)< ,t'1>
Acting Planning and zoningvbireQior
DATE: November 8, 1993
SUBJECT: Dry Cleaners in the CBD
Use Determination and fee waiver
Introduction - Jim Hudson, owner of the property at 521 North
Federal Highway, zoned central Business District (CBD), has
requested a determination of whether a dry cleaning service with
dry cleaning performed on premises, but limited to handling goods
that are brought to the premises by retail customers, is an
acceptable use in the CBn (see attached letter received November 5,
1993). Mr. Hudson is currently in the site plan approval process
(a maj or modification) to convert the existing, vacant building ~, ct
521 North Federal Highway into the requested dry cleaning service.~~ ~
As part of the preapplication process, Mr. Hudson received ~
information from the city which encouraged him to proceed with ;-kJ, ~
preparing a formal site plan application. During the first round I~
of site plan comments, a comment was generated by the Building :T" -
Department that dry cleaning plants are prohibited and that dry 4~crA!1
cleaning on. the p emises is not allowed in the CBD. ~~~ ~~ vip ['t
-. - i ~ 14 Mr ~~;r~'I) ':'~I~
Through d1sc sions wi h the city Attorney, it was decided to place
this matter before the City Commission for clarification and a use
determination. Mr. Hudson is also requesting that the $150 use
determination fee be waived. He says his justification is that he
would not have proceeded with hiring an architect to draw a site
plan if he had been told during the preapplication process that the
use he is reques . _ not acce,Ptable. . _~c4L I"".;k. Gn...A.oI
...;~ . 4(--f/L. L -.;t/'lgo.,~, 11-, C6D --p~- u VI ~-'I'I#-r.
Analvsis The C-2, C-3 and C-4 commercial? zoning districts .fot...~~l1.f
specifically allow a "dry cleaning service, limited to handling 1.;,fL.~
goods that are brought to the premises by retail customers" and ~-
"dry cleaning on the premises, limited to handling goods that are (1<Il'Yt
brought to the premises by retail customers" is listed as a use
requiring an environmental review permit. The M-1, Light
Industrial, zoning district allows "uniform, towel, and linen
supply services; industrial launderers; laundry and dry cleaning
plants, excluding retail pick-up and drop-off on premises", subj ect
to issuance of an environmental review permit. The CBD allows
"coin-operated laundromats, dry cleaning pick-up, tailors and
dressmakers, alteration and repair of clothing or clothing
accessori s", but expressly prohibits "laundry or dry cleaning
plants" P In addition, dry cleaning service and dry cleaning plants
are defined under "Definition of terms" in the zoning code.
W' respect to the comprehensive plan, the CBD falls under the
ixed Use land use category which allows personal services.
A '. conC1US.ion - The City Commission may take one 9f t. he following
,^/I action~t~regar~ to this request: ;;::Wt~<-Ite Clh, ~
~~ r1) decide th~ requested use is not appropriate and was not
~~~ intended to be allowed in the CBD based on the CBn omission of
'. ~wJ.vdrop-off" and "dry cleaning on premises"; or
. ~ 2) decide that the requested use is appropriate and is a matter
of interpretation that can made based on the M-1 definition of
dry cleaning plants and the omission of "dry cleaning on
premises" from the CBD list of prohibited uses.
I
TO:
J. Scott Miller
-2-
November 8, 1993
If the city Commission determines that the requested use is
appropriate in the CBD, it is advised that staff be directed to
prepare an amendment to the zoning code for future clarification.
This amendment would require forwarding to the Planning and
Development Board for a determination of consistency with the
comprehensive plan, prior to ordinance readings at the City
Commission. Pursuant to the adopted fee schedul~~_~he cost for
such amendments, after a use determination is m~~ iSA $250 to
cover staff's preparation time and advertising. ~ ~ ~ ~_
tjh
Attachments
A:CBDDryCI
.1
..... ...-:'_..........1:-.-..
-........ ........ .",- ',".. .- .." .
,Lid A ~ n J)~ ('-!u-~U4
6lifJ3 d.~~&~
~~ -?'--33C;'i-
8. . 'Y . ,,L:/~
~: ~(JJ;i
~ '-6-p ~I
U--a ~ hJJ - ~L c~.A
~v0 Lk/. ~J.. ~ ~,,'-" ~nw Qd
~l~ /J1~ ~ ~~ ~ ~.-- .
~.~ -. ~-6 k :C'7'JALkJ
.j} ~ A . ~ ). J~
/hU-XZ -,;J.~~~~-;L{ ~~
:;~ ~~t4~ ~~~ ~b~
. '1 ~ /J~;) ~ 0-/. 0>;,1 ~#r~.
./.4 A,~ ~ HtJ~~~ ~~~
O-<J //1Le. aJ~a ..ei~. ~ . /J
() -if ". 0 ~~~~ ~o
~ ~ /Jf-nU .-4.# ~ ~ ~~~t:Ut.A
~ (:J7 -etJ<L ~.u~.J'ni~
J:;-~ ;-/ ~,.~ ~.~
. ~~ ~ ~~ tJ.--L.. 01.1.-<-. ac-nt.-
/Y ~~'. .
~~ ~ d ~ ::6 J,.... n1J &l /)lL/'-k1-
Ae-.4J ~~ d~L y ~v~~. JL~ 4~L; ~
tDL ~ ~pJUUn<.M..4 ~<J, ~~ ~J ?4
+-nC /1 ~ (1J-<LZ;7IU1~ · '"" / -r- ' _
" /7 , 7J::- . _ /) , I- 11 - I tL ~ ~nL~ ?L~<...nU I
'-... ~.4-"1~ ~ '
--"(t ~ ~-.d;; C!f&?VJ>>~;u) L4 /2LLe~ ---!)..La_<L4'(~
..----- --.-..-- --..---..,- --- -'..
# ~,?4 ~ ~ . :d-VW-L,
'-tI~.vY ~~;.J ~ ~
~Si), k ffi ~ ~ -JJ~j}
~2~~~~~
~J :;t~~.~~r~
~ u<-- ~ VJ fl~J
/--<-~ p.:~ ju ~~
~ HL:U-J. -IJ J~ lUL c~fJ
-t ~.) tL ;.iJc F;- <Y- ~ ~ ~
~ ~ eMu! ;tk~-
~' /la..- .. J+t1 ~
. Ii 7l~ /7f,.L , .. ~
j) iufJJ ~r . u:u :Ii;if
~0JtL~f '
. 1-t-.J L;r''- ~ _ ~ ~~WJ
~"-' ;;UM /1/LdLL-V f:L4JM ~<L ,t.~
~c 7S ~~~~u
t../f--RJ0 · fJ I U
yc..-r--- L./ ~ ~~.
/~-4{~
co.
...
j:'rOm.. C-.2 g~,^,/~-hfo~s
APPENDIX A-ZONING Sec. 8
capacity of not more than one (1) ton. All repair and
service of vehicles shall be done within an enclosed
building. ..
dd. Print shops.
B Drycleaning service, limited to handling goods that
are brought to the premises by retail customers.
ff. Private clubs. lodges. and fraternal organizations."
gg. Drive-up, drive-through, or drive-in service for any of
the retail uses or personal services listed uqder I.e.
through 1.tT. above." Drive-up and drive-through facil-
ities for financial institutions shall be a permitted use,
however.
hh. Art or recreational instruction.
The following uses. provided that the gross floor area of
such use does not exceed ten thousand (10.000) square feet:
ii. Grocery, food, ice cream, confectionary, and health
food stores; delicate8$ans, butcher shops and seafood
stores, vegetable and fruit stores, convenience food
stores, and bakeries; catering service.. .
ii. General hardware store.. ' ,
kk. Restauranta, including serving of alcoholic beverages
only in connection with the serving of meals.
11. Drive-through, drive-up, or drive-in restaurants."
mm. Sundries, notions. and variety stores. :
nn. Drug stores.
00. Clothing, clothing accessory, and shoe stores.
pp. Lawn and garden supply stores.
qq. Drive-up, drive-through or drive-in service for any of
the retail uses or personal services listed under l.ii.
through l.pp. above." Drive-up and drive-through fa-
cilities for financial institutions shall be a ~ermitted
use. however.
All uses listed under I.e. thJ;Ough 1.qq. l'~ve shall specify
the gross floor area on the application for an occupational
license. Each retail store and acljacent stores or bays under
the same ownership or control that are of a similar or
related use shall be considered to be a single store for the
purpose of computing floor area.
.
IA. Conditional uses allowed.: Those uses specified above which
are followed by an asterisk (*) shall be deemed to be condi-
Supp. No. 35 1919
"I'
--........ ., :
..~i.,... .
1C:.OI',..___ -- :. :J:... ...... ~. I"~"'''-''~'''"~'''''''''<r.~.......~...,.
-......~....
..
Sec. 8
-h-of'1 C-cZ !PPLAujd.-+t'ons
BOYNTON ~E~ CODE
tional uses, which may be considered and granted in ac-
cordance with the procedures set forth in section 11.2 of
Appendix A of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boyn.
ton Beach, Florida.
lB. Uses requiring an environmental review permit. Within
any C.2 neighborhood commercial zoning district, no build-
ing, structure, land or water, or any part thereof, shall be
erected, altered, or used, in whole or in part, for any of the
following specified uses, unless an environmental review
permit is secured in accordance with the standards and
procedures set forth in section 11.3:
a. Automotive service stations, subject to the provision
of 1.ec. above.
b. Print shops.
~ Drycleaning on premises, limited to handling goods
'-.:./ that are brought to the premises by retail customers.
d. Any use listed under 6.B.1 or 6.B.lA, which uses,
handles, stores, or displays hazardous materials, or
which generates hazardous waste as, defined by 40
Code of Federal Regulations, Part 261.
2. Prohibited uses. Within any C-2 neighborhood commercial
zoning district, no building, structure, land or water, or
any part thereof, shall be erectea~ altered. or used, in whole
or in part, for any of the following uses:
a. Any use not specifically allowed in accordance with
the list pf uses under I., lA., and lB., above.
b. Any use which is either specifically allowed or prohib-
ited in another zoning district, which is not speciflt
cally allowed in accordance with the list of uses under
1., lA., and lB., above.
c. Outdoor storage or display of any type.
d. Sale of firearms or ammunition.
e. Sale of fireworks.
f. Temporary employment centers, operated on a walk-
in basis.
g. Any wholesale establishments, storage as a principal
use, or off-premises storage, or distribution.
h. Sa.le of alcoholic beverages, other than heer or ~ine.
Supp. No. 35
1920
..
& IIY1 fv1-' 12.'fJu-I A--h ~Yl s
Sec. 8 BOYNTON BEACH CODE
(7) Print shops, photographic laboratories, commer.
cial photography, commercial art, silk screening,
@lithOgraPhY, typesetting, and blueprinting services.
(8) Uniform, towel, and linen supply services; indus-
trial launderers; laundry and dry-cleaning plants,
excluding retail pickup and drop-off on premises;
carpet and rug cleaning plants.
(9) Tire recapping.
(10) Building cleaning and janitorial services and swim.
ming pool maintenance services, where such uses
would be located within the minimum distance
requirement specified in section 8.A.2.
c. Storage, distribution, wholesale, and other uses, retail
display and sales shall be prohibited unless specific.
ally permitted below or elsewhere in this section.
(1) Petroleum and petroleum products, including sol.
vents and liquified petroleum gas; bulk or nonbulk
storage, sales, or distribution.
(2) Chemicals, pesticides, and herbicides, excluding
bulk storage, bulk sales, or bulk distribution.
(3) Bulk or nonbulk wholesale or retail sale of sol.
vents and cleaning preparations, including (ormu.
l~ting of cleaning preparations for sale on premises.
(4) Industrial and medical gases; bottled or bulk st0r-
age, sales or distribution, excluding chlorine, flu.
orine, ammonia, hydrogen sulppide, sulphur diox.
ide, or toxic gases.
(5) Temporary amusement parks and rides, fain, car.
nivals, circuses, and revivals, provided that all
such uses shall have a minimum frontage of two
hundred (200) feet on a collector or arterial road
and the mejor access thereto, and that the dura-
tion of any such use shall not exceed fourteen (14)
consecutive days within any one.year period.
d. Miscellaneous uses, as follows:
(1) Any use which uses, handles, stores, or displays
hazardous materials, or which generates hazard.
ous waste, as defined by 40 Code of Federal Regu.
lations, Part 261.
Supp. No. 35
1934.6
!
-from Ce:>'O RejuJIJ...:f1'on S
Sec. 6 BOYNTON BEACH CODE
uu. Sidewalk sales, subject to approval by the com.
munity redevelopment agency.
Services:
vv. Personal service establishments.
ww. Printing, engraving, fine art studios, photofinish-
ing service, photographic studios and laboratoriesf
film and recording studios.
xx. *Funeral homes, excluding crematoriums.
C) Business machine service offices.
zz: Coin-operated laundromats, dry cleaning pickup,
tailors and dressmakers, alteration and repair of
clothing or clothing accessories.
Transportation:
aaa. Public parking lots and garages.
bbb. *Bus terminals and taxi stands.
cCC. *Railroad passenger stations.
ddd. · Automobile rental, limited to rental of new cars.
eee. *Helistops.
ftT. *Private parking lots and garages, where opere
ated as a principal \1se._. .
lA. Uses requiring environmental review permits. Any use listed
under 6.E.l. which uses, handles, stores, or displays haze
ardous materials, or which generates h~ardous waste, as
defined by 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 261, shall
require an environmental review permit in accordance with
section 11.3 of these zoning regulations. i
2. Uses prohibited. Within the central business district, nc
building, structure, land, or water, or any portion thereof,
shall be used for any of the following uses:
a. Any use not specifically allowed in accordance with
section 6.E.!. above.
b. Any use specifically prohibited in section 6.E.!. above.
C. Adult entertainm~mt establishments.ud. Massage parlors.
e. Laundry or dry cleaning plants; carpet or upholstery
cleaning plant or service.
Supp. No. 35
,
1924.2
-f;.On-1 tit. fu..re.. L~Vl e{ U~e... E/emen+ t:Jf
Com.prehens;~ P/a-n
Same as Low Density Residential, except that the
maximum gross density shall be 10.8 dwelling
units per acre.
special High Density Residential:
This land use category shall consist of
residential areas assigned to this land use
category in the coastal Management Element, and
may be applied only in Coastal Area as designated
in the Coastal Management Element.
The uses allowed in this land use category shall
be limited to, but shall not necessarily include,
the following:
Same as Low Density Residential, except that the
maximum gross density shall be 20 dwelling units
per acre.
Office Commercial:
~his land use category shall consist of all C-1
Office and Professional commercial zoning
districts, and any other zoning districts which
may be established, including Planned Commercial
Development zoning districts, which are similar
in character to the C-1 district, provided that
all of the abovementioned zoning districts are
shown on the Future Land Use Map within the
Office Commercial land use category.
The uses allowed in this land use category shall
be limited to, but shall not necessarily include,
the following:
Business, professional, and administrative
offices; and financial institutions; funeral
homes; places of worship; schools and
instruction,' day-care centers, and educational
institutions; museums; hospitals and other health
care services, group homes, nursing homes and
related health care facilities; s~clal and civic
clubs and organizations; civic and community
centers; limited retail and business services
which are related to the above uses.
~ Local Retail Commercial:
This land use category shall consist of all C-2
Neighborhood Commercial and C-3 Community
Commercial zoning districts, and any other zoning
districts which may be established, including
Planned Commercial Development zoning districts,
24
r
which are sim1:lar ln character to the C-2 or C-3
districts, provided that all of the
abovementioned zoning districts are shown on the
Future Land Use Hap within the Local Retail
Commercial land use category.
The uses allowed in this land use category shall
be limited to, but shall not necessarily include,
the following:
All uses allowed in the office Commercial land
use category, plus retail uses, personal
services, and repair of consumer goods; wholesale
~of non-hazardous commodities; business services
which are compatible with retail uses;
entertainment, recreation facilities, amusements,
attractions, and exposition halls; lodging
facilities; marinas and. boat storage; passenger
transportation facilities; temporary amusements,
revival tents, and the like; also, high-density
residential (maximum 10.8 dwellings units per
acre), including mixed use developments.
"* Mixed Use:
This land use category shall consist of all CBD -
Central Business District zoning districts and/or
any zoning district(s) which may be established
subsequent to the adoption of the Plan, provided
that all of the abovementioned zoning districts
are shown on the Future Land Use Map within the
Mixed Use land use category.
The uses allowed in this land use category shall
be limited to, but shall not necessarily include
the following:
All uses located in the Local Retail Commercial
land use category, plus all uses located in the-
High Density Residential Land Use Category;
however, residential and hotel/motel densities up
to forty (40) dwelling units per acre are
permitted.
All land development located in the Mixed
Use category shall be required to submit a
plan which includes a single unified design
for the project, and shall conform to any
adopted design planes) for the area covered by
the category.
General Commercial:
This land use category shall consist of all C-4
General Commercial zoning districts, and any
25
CHECKLIST
The following list and information is provided as a checklist to ensure that
the submittal of amended plans and documents is substantially complete for
review. Turning in this list and the appropriate plans and documents will
enable the submittal to be efficiently checked prior to being accepted by the
Planning and Zoning Department.
Project Name: Agape DryCleaner
1. Submit an amended Site Plan Review/Conditional Use application form that
reflects the changes that were made as a result of amending the plans and
documents to comply with the code of Ordinances and the Technical Review
Committee comments. A copy of the original form with a distinguishable
symbol identifying the change(s) may be submitted or a completed new form
with the changes identified. It is the agent of the owners responsibility
to notify the owner(s) of changes. If there are no changes required to be
documented on the application form, a letter from the applicant stating
same must be turned in with the amended submittal.
2. Submit twelve (12) assembled and complete sets of plans and documents,
including surveys that show compliance with the Code of Ordinances and
comments made by the Technical Review Committee. Two (2) of the sets shall
have the appropriate legible raised seal and signature of the designer
responsible for the drawing(s). plans and documents shall be assembled in
twelve (12) individual complete packages with the title of the project on
all pages and/or sheets and each page or sheet numerically numbered such
as the following example: 1 of 3, 2 of 3, 3 of 3.
3. Submit color photographs of the buildings on the site that are to remain
in their existing condition and photos of existing buildings that are
located on the sites that abut the perimeter of the subject property. The
minimum size is 8" by 10". Each photograph shall be labeled to identify
the location of the existing structures with respect to the location of
the proposed project.
4. Submit colored elevation view drawings - a colored duplicate copy of all
drawings of the elevation views of each side of all buildings and signage
associated with the project. The colored elevation views shall match the
elevations shown in the documents that where submitted for site plan
review. The applicable exterior surfaces as identified above shall be
colored with the color name and associated color reference number
identified. The type of exterior surface material shall be identified next
to the associated color. The colored elevation drawings shall have compass
direction or title of the side of the building identified. The title block
of the original drawing shall be shown. The maximum size is 24" by 36". Do
no submit on board of any kind.
5. Submit color samples as an example of the proposed colors. Each sample
shall have attached a label that identifies the color by name and
numerical/letter code from an established color chart.
6. Submit a 8 1/2" x 11" transparency of the landscape site plan .drawing to
be used on an overhead projector at board meetings.
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 93 - 450
DATE:
October 22, 1993
TO:
Tambr~ Heyden, Acting Planninq and
FROM:
John A. Guidry, utilities Director
SUBJECT:
Agape Dry Cleaners - Major Site Plan Modification
We offer the following comments on this project:
1) A reduoed pressure backflow preventer will be required on
the water service to this building, to be installed between
the water meter and the building in a protected area. (Sect.
26-107)
We have no objection to this project being forwarded to the City
Commission.
Please refer any questions on this matter to Clyde "Skip" Milor of
this office.
JAG!PVM
be: Peter Mazzella
xc: Skip Milor
File
Asst. to the Director
0.4 hours
/ ~ r ~f.//~ v.J
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #93-216
TO: Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ: Major Site Plan Review - Agape Dry Cleaners
DATE: October 22, 1993
The above site is to be a can pickup, therefore a dumpster
enclosure is not needed for this type of operation.
I also believe that this is an incorrect address.
If you have any questions please let me know.
REier
MEMORANDUM
RE:
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning:& Zoninq Director
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent ~
/0 - ~7-('.3 f-
Site Plan Review - New Site Plan - 1st Review
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Project: -AGAptE b~y C(.EAyVi~AS
The Recreation and Parks Department has reviewed the
above referenced project. There are no outstanding
recreation related issues on this project.
,,~ @
U271R3
t ING AND
ING DEPT.
FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-285 WDC
TO: Planning and Zoning Department
FROM: Fire Department
DATE: October 28, 1993
SUBJECT: TRC Site Plan
AGAPE
We have no objections to this plan.
~i=-D. ~!SH FPO I
BOYNTON BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
WDC:CP
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REF:
MEMORANDUM
POLICE #93-168
Tambri Heyden
Acting Planning & Zoning Director
Sgt. Michael Kirrman
October 25, 1993
1st Review - Agape Cleaners
Ms. Heyden,
I have reviewed the plans and have the following comments:
1. Suggest placing a stop sign/bar at exit from
parking area;
2. Suggest lighting for parking and rear of building.
I have no further comments at this time.
MK/jb
7!luic., ~ &~Ul
Michael Kirrman
/
,(
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
Acting Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Dorothy Moore
Site Plans Reviewer
DATE:
November 4, 1993
RE:
Site Plan Review - 1st Review
Major Site plan Modification
Agape Dry Cleaners
The following comments are in response to the submittal of the
site plan for the above-referenced project. The comments for the
project will be discussed at the Technical Review Committee
meeting, Tuesday, october 26, 1993. The site plan was reviewed
for consistency with the review standards specified in Section 8
of Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Part III, Land Development
Regulations of the Code of Ordinances. The applicant shall amend
the drawings and documents to show compliance with the following
comments:
1. Please submit a recent certified property survey for Lots 1,
portion of 2, portion of 3 and Lot 4, Block 4, Roberts Addition.
These subject properties are shown on the site plan and thus
would require a current recorded Unity of Title. In lieu of a
current recorded Unity of Title a cross parking and cross access
agreement by all property owners must be provided.
2. Identify on the plans the existing and proposed use of the
on-site structures.
3. There are inconsistencies between the "typical parking
spaces" drawings and the "site plan" drawings. The dimensions do
not match. Please correct these inconsistencies.
4. There are no traffic control devices shown on the site
plans. Please identify by note/drawing/dimensions the driveway,
directional arrows, stop bars and stop signs.
5. Please identify the location of the required parking lot
site lighting on the landscape plan and specify on the drawings
the average of one (1) foot candle @ ground level. Located to
not reflect directly onto adjacent property.
6. Please identify on the landscape plans and specity on the
drawings the pedestrian lighting designed to provide an average
of three-quarters (3/4) footcandle at ground level. Pedestrian
lighting shall be energy efficient metal halide.
7. Please identify on the plans the required pedestrian
walkways. The walkways shall be in accordance with the Central
Business District guidelines. (Minimum 61 width is recommended.)
8. Please identify the required exterior furnishing(s) on the
landscape plans and speCify also on the drawings. (Example:
seating, benches, garbage rec. etc.)
9. The required cross visibility rectangle on both sides of the
driveway shall be identified on the landscape and site plans.
The cross visibility allows a clear view between three (3) feet
and six (6) feet above grade level. The rectangle dimensions
are: fifteen (15') feet in length along the right-of-way and
five (5') feet in width. The cross visibility shall be provided
on both sides of the driveway intersecting the public right-of-
way.
AGAPE DRY CLEANERS
PAGE 2
10. Provide a note on plans: shrubs and ground cover in
landscaped parking areas shall be maintained so as to be no
higher than three (3) feet within five (5') feet of a driveway.
11. Please correct the landscape plans to provide by note:
"Hedges shall receive two (2") inch Melaleuca mulch."
12. The landscaping material that is shown on Lot 3 should be
drawn and shown on Agape's property, unless it is existing. Then
it should be identified as such on the plans.
13. An existing building as shown on the plans is situated
partly on L1 and partly on L4 and is encroaching onto and over
the property line onto the public right-of-way of North Federal
Highway. The addition would create an expansion of a
nonconforming structure. This shall require prior City approval
as per Appendix A: 6.E. CBD Central Business District,
7. (Nonconforming Structures)
14. The proposed use, drycleaning on the premises, limited to
handling of goods for retail customers, requires use
determination by the City Commission. This use determination is
scheduled to be heard by the City Commission at their November
16, 1993, at which time the Commission will make one of the
following decisions:
a) To allow the proposed use as an interpretation of the
Code;
b) Disallow the proposed use or;
c) Direct staff to prepare an amendment to the Zoning Code
to specifIcally allow the proposed use.
The cost for the process involving steps a) or b) above is
$150.00. If the Commission directs staff to amend the Zoning
code, a separate $250.00 fee will be required.
As discussed by phone on November 4, 1993, a letter describing
the proposed use is needed by 5:00 p.m., Friday, November 5, 1993
to be scheduled for the November 16, 1993 commission review.
15. If the use is determined by the City Commission to be
appropriate, then an Environmental Review permit should be
applied for by submitting an application to the planning and
Zoning Department.
DM/jm
A:AGAPE.JM
"
~
,
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-210
October 19, 1993
From:
Al Newbold, Deputy Building
~I
To:
Tambri Heyden, Acting' Planning Director
Via:
Don Jaeger, Building Official
Re:
TRC COMMENTS
1st Review - Major Site Plan Modification
Project - Agape Dry Cleaners
Location - 521 N. Federal Hwy.
The Building Department has reviewed the plans for the above
referenced project and offers the following comments:
1. The site plan drawn by George Davis differs from the
survey in that it includes a portion of Lots 2 and 3.
This would require a Unity of Title and research on the
balance of Lots 2 and 3 to ascertain whether use of
part of these lots (75' X 34.5') creates other
violations. Submittal requirements include a copy of a
recent survey (the submitted survey is nearly six yea~.f\
old) .
2. An existing building is shown on Mr. Davis' plan
located on an adjacent lot. This structure may need to
be addressed for code compliance if the entire property
is treated as one parcel. If not, cross parking and
access agreements must be provided.
3. The window openings on the east side of the cleaners
must comply with Table 600. Only show windows and
store fronts are exempt.
4. If all of Lot 3 is not going to be a part of this
proposed property, the landscaping should be provided
on Agape's property unless an agreement between both
prope~ty owners has been made.
5. Because the existing building is located on a zero lot
line, the proposed addition would create an expansion
of a nonconforming building which requires City
approval under Appendix A, Section 6.E.7. (Non-
conforming Structures).
6. Appendix A, Section 6.E.2 (Uses Prohibited) lists dry
cleaning plants as a prohibited use.
AN:mh
AGAPE.TRC
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-308
DATE:
Tambri Heyden
Acting Planning & zoning Director
Office of the City Engineer~~
October 26, 1993 tJI
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Technical Review Committee Comments
Agape Site Plan Modification
City Engineer Comments
My review of the subject site plan indicates the following needs
to be furnished.
1. Complete drainage calculations
2. Retention calcLlations
3. Soil percolaticn calculations and soil report on data and source
used as basis of calculations.
4. Descriptive information of or specifications of "Typar #3401
membrane".
Deputy City Engineer Comments~
The following required improvements necessary to attain compliance
with City code are as follows:
1. Installation of perimeter parking lot, pavement area and pedestrian
walkway lighting in accordance with section 5-l42(a) and 5-142(b).
Levels of illumination shall comply with City standards, specifically
Section 5-142(g), appendix, Lighting Standards.
2. The applicant shall install required stop signs and directional
arrows within this facility as well as the posting of US Hwy. #l
"No Parking" signage along either side of NE 5th Avenue for a
distance of approximately '(*) in either direction. FOOT standards.
3. The applicant shall revise plans to provide for a handicap parking
stall which com21ies with the Department on Community Affairs
Accessibility Manual. Section 5-l42(k), Handicap Requirements.
The position of the 5' wide handicap access area as depicted upon
plans appears to be along the passenger side of the depicted
parking stall and it is recommended that the 12' wide stall be
shifted east and the 5' wide access area be located along the west
side of the stall in order to provide parking lot entry to
individuals exiting the passenger side of vans, etc.
(*) See attached DOT Index No. 17358
TRC Comments/Engineering Dept. Memo No. 93-308
October 26, 1993
Page #2
4. parking stalls along the south side of the parking facility
are shown 16' in total length and shall be revised to conform
with City codes which requires a parking stall to be 18' in
length. Revise plans accordingly. Section 5-l42(l), Parking
Lot Striping.
5. Repair with concrete the broken and avulsed concrete apron at
Federal Highway (south corner is patched with asphalt).
Incorporated herein and made a part hereof please find Mr. Harold
Benoit, P.E. memo dated 10/25/93 regarding his comments generated
during the initial review process for Agape Cleaners.
The Office of the City Engineer has no objection(s) to this plan
moving forward to the reviewing boards subject to full compliance
with Technical Review Committee comments as provided.
JDW:VAF/ck
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
DATE:
Harry T. Benoit, City, P .E., City Engineer c:H. <t::::t3,
October 25, 1993
RE:
Agape Dry Cleaners, 521 N. Federal Highway
Boynton Beach, Fl
A review ot the site plan submission tor Agape Dry Cleaners, indicates that the following
items need to be addressed:
1. Paving & parking are indicated beyond the property line ot this site.
2. Plan Dimensions are conflicting and inconsistent with the plan scale.
3. No grading is shown on the plans.
4. Drainage retention computations on the plan are insufficient to determine Code
Compliance.
5. There is no indication of trash storage facilities.
6. Cross sections of surface retention swales have not been provided.
93~025/246
Ibf
\\
_.~'.J""------ "
t"" ~ a: V)
n ._1 ,.~ 0 ~
~'" Ll.. <x:.
~ LL=> ~ . \.lJ
~ 8.2
.-..... c:. ( , ~~ ~ ~ 0 ! a::
~'" 3t O.S: ~ ~ ",a: 0 ~ <x:.
"Ii ,,~'" " ~ a ~~ .... i=: u
.~-;: ~1~ u
;l ~ ",Q=> U I.U C)
Cl ~ " Q "'u CE V) ~ C)
~ i~'i 4; ~ VI ..: a:: ~ ~ ~
>- >- ~~ ....2: ! I-
~ c:: ~ ~.~'t;) " ~ .c1 0 V) lI..J ~ a:: ~
:. : '0 ... e~ .., " :00 ....>- ~~ I- <x:.
T :00 ~ :l~ b ~ lI..J ~ a::
~ ~';;;I i~", ~ .., 2:(J b ~ '::&;
~~ ..V> ..., ~ a: 11 <x:.
l.lJ l; "'<t: 0"'"
\I\~.2.S_~ ~.. ~ *~ ~lQ a a..
~:::u..;.~~:; a.. :00 " ~ Q -J : * . .
>- .. V> .. ~ ~\U .. <x:.
\~\!i~t&.. l- '" :: .-i '" ct:1- e ~ ~ U 8 8
" ...:00 ~ ;;C u
.... 1-2: .~-
t-j/^::' '6 ~ l/l- .::i
;~goe.Cl- ~ --:-T. ~ >- 'a! 0 - '" ~ \.lJ
u .r;. ~.- 'i ~ i~ :i g '~l <( a.. I ~ ~ ~
~ -: t~ ~ ~ cO :::i~ \U
" " on l:j"-l ~.~ a.. ~ V)
!8'au&,,~~& 0. \ 0. ~%i ..., 2::::i ~
~ ~ 0 >2~ ~i
':; - ~~aU~ I.U ~ V)
r.. r.. - '.- 0. ~~ '- ~
~ &,. ~~ ..til VI "f-e $
~~iu.!tu >- ~ct= a
~ ~
Nw)":V; ..0 S
~
Vi
"
&
V)
~
....J
<x:.
~
V)
V) ao
o ...
a: 0
u '"
~ !
Ll.. ci
V) '"
~ ::.
c: ~
i :
~ ~
I.U
....J 0::
<(
u
it
>-
I-
~
(J
ff
o<!;'
,
---""'
I
/I
I I
/ I
I
I
1
1
I
I
- I
, I
\1
\
,. \
\1\
\' ,
\ .'"..c,
\ !
~ \
~ \
II "'\
\ \
,\ \
\ \ \
1 e \
~ \-
'"
.!!
1
~
..
c
<;
c
o
~~
\~
~l
\i
il
,,1!
"
V)
~
i=:
u
lI..J
V)
a::
lI..J
I-
~
Q
~
::i
<(
~
~
Ii)
~
o
LL
a::
o
Ll..
~
I-
U
CE
l-
V)
lI..J
a:
~
~
~
a:
<(
0...
::!;
::::>
~
~
S
~
"
i
'"
.~
b
15I
H~
uo,U U
G.I'~
.c WI U
~~ ~
"go
~';C
~&.
l!~
~Q
~1!
<>'"
~~
'"
.!!
~
~
~
-l;
I.U
"'~ in b
-'""".... ~
",'"
...
~
>-",
vt ~. .
'" "" ::b l2
!l:....
8'"
e
o
~
~
I.U
'C
..
.~
<5
..:
....~
I-
2:(.)
Qb\
I-ct:
~~
e:~
t30
a::~
~:::i
2:<(
i;22:
a::~
~Vi
2:
~~
:IE
~
~
..
"",
-'"
~.~
..~
~~
."
",-
g'~
'';:'<<:)
""
.....
.,.,
i,g
c..l:?
" '"
""~
.~~
-.;..
,,::> .
.?t:, ~
., > -
. "
",'" ..
g~ ~
.... ~ 0.
<";).- E
4. '\:: "-
'"
.~ .
~]
~~
.s.~
, -I ,
i,':.,
~~~=-
..
~ ~ a
a:
t-
V>
0.
::;,
OC
:~
:;;'"
.~~
,,-
g.2
.,.,
g~
~.~
'- ~
0'"
~:t: ~ 10
~~ .0""
V>
""..
~~
g~
,,<>
",.~
"'~
,,'"
5c
~:
VI '" 0
....
l-
e
'"
~
..
~
o
~
c! 1 c5
\~i Q CO
l ~, lU::!;
.t'i a.. >-
q::: a.. VI
i!~ <( I-
l;~~ U ~
i~: CS l.&.I
"1 ~~ ~ ~::!;
..~~. <( IJ.J
-, ..'lie J:: ~
;~~. 0::
...;
N
.~"
.-i-
-.
\ ;
r----;O :r-~'
.0 "S
~
\ \ \V ~
\l,\\ Y I.U
j 1.1 k ~ ~
'" 1'1 ~ ~
t \~\: 11\ 0'~~~ !
V\ .,.. <r:
, :00
~99
~ t:: -~
" ~,; ~
~~
~~
a-~
-e~
a'"
-~
$!~
...
g
.;
;;:
\. \ \L-- l
~\ \1' J \\, "'\
~ I'! ~"'\
~ \i \~ '
~ ~\ \ J
",\\kJ
.' "'" ':i
j\ l /
~\ \ \ ~ ~\, /
J\, ~ --I~'
o \-:: \' / w ~
'" i / i ~
& \~\ ~\ ~ ,-~\ .
~'~'~
- ...
_ - 5
,mB r
..
";1
.,
c
"
~
I-
::::>
u
~~
\
~
'?'
RECREATION Ii PAU MEMORANDUM '93-431
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
Tambri Heyden, Senior Planner
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Agape Dry Cleaners
October 21, 1993
~~~+
There are no existing tree concerns for this site.
KH:ad
00 lli & ~ ~,Wi ~ ill
SITE PLAN REVIEW
STAFF REPORT
FOR
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD
December 9, 1993
Project Name:
Agape Cleaners and Laundry
Applicant:
James R. Hudson
Agent:
N/A
Location:
521 North Federal Highway
Land Use Plan Designation: Local Retail Commercial
Zoning Designation: Central Business District
Type of Use: Dry Cleaners
Numbers of Unit: Two
Square Footage:
Building Addition
First Building
Second Building
Total Square Feet
176 sq. ft.
1187
707
2070
Description of Property: James R. Hudson, as future of owner of
the property, is requesting site plan approval to modify the site
which is located at 521 North Federal Highway.
The property consists of two existing structures, totalling 1894
square feet on a 0.16 acre site.
The proposed modifications to the site iwll include adding 176
square feet of building area to the southwest side of the existing
1187 square foot building. The two existing buildings, which
includes the building that will have the addition built on it, are
currently vacant.
The site is located in the Central Business District, Zoning
District and the Design District - I Coastal village. The design
and color of the new addition and the modification to the existing
structure will be consistent with the requirements of the I Coast
Village Architectural themes and design guidelines for the Central
Business District.
The number of required parking spaces required per code is four,
including one (1) handicapped space.
The landscape will be consistent with the required improvements
specif ied in the Code. The landscaping shown on the southwest side
of the property line is not located on the subject property.
However, the code allows landscaping on adj acent property to
satisfy landscaping requirements if said landscaping is in
compliance with the Code. The acceptability of the off-site
landscaping is field verified by the landscape inspector. If the
off-site material is not acceptable, the applicant will have to
modify the plan and provide the required continuous hedging.
An existing building as shown on the plans is situated partly on
Lot 1 and Lot 4 - BI 4 - Roberts addn, less east 35.0'. This
building is encroaching onto and over the property line on to the
public right-of-way of North Federal Highway. The addition would
create an expansion of a non-conforming structure. This shall
require prior City approval as per Appendix A: 6E CBD Central
Business District 7. (Non-Conforming Structures) a, b, c & d.
Page Two -
Note: As per Appendix A: 6E CBD
Central Business District
7 e. Development Standards
( 2 )
All sites will be brought into compliance with the zoning and
development regulations of the City to the maximum extent possible.
With this report is a data outline showing where the project
complies and does not comply with the Appendix A - Zoning Sec. 6,
E. CBD Central Business District, 3. Building and Site Regulations
Review of Departmental Concerns:
Please find attached the comments from all of the reviewing
departments the Technical Review Committee recommends that the
project proceed forward through the approval process subject to the
following comments.
Building Department
Memorandum No. 93-237
Planning and Zoning Department
Memorandum No. 93-315
Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Department recommends that
the Community Redevelopment Advisory Board find the site plan
review acceptable and forward same to the City Commission with a
recommendation to approve, subject to the applicant submitting
working drawings to the Building Department that depict the project
in compliance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Code of
Ordinances and the attached staff comments.
c:staff
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-316
TO: Chairman and Members
Community Redevelopment Advlsory Board (CRAB)
FROM:
Dottie Moore
Zoning and SIte Plan Reviewer
Tambri J. Heyden ~
Acting Plannlng and Zoning Director
THRU:
DATE:
December 9, 1993
SUBJECT: Agape Cleaners and Laundry - Major Site Plan Modification
File No. 780
STAFF REPORT
Project Name: Agape Cleaners and Laundry
Applicant: James R. Hudson
Agent: N/A
Location: 521 North Federal Highway
Land Use Plan Designation: Local Retall Commercial
Zoning Designatlon: Central BUSlness District
Type of Use: Dry Cleaners (cleaning done on premises) and laundry
Number of Units: N/A
Total BUilding Gross Floor Area:
Existing Commerclal Building
Existing Residential Building
Addition to Commercial Building
Total
1187 sq. ft.
707 sq. ft.
176 Sq. ft.
2070 sq. ft.
Description of Project: James R. Hudson, contract purchaser of the
property at 521 North Federal Highway, is requesting approval of a
major site plan modification. There are two existing structures on
the 0.16 acre property, totalling 1,894 square feet. The proposed
modifications include a 176 square foot addition to the southwest
side of the existing commercial building, installation of a parking
lot and landscaping. The number of parking spaces to be provided
is six; four within the new parking lot and two for the existing
residential building, as per code.
Relative to landscaping, if the attached staff comments related to
landscaping are addressed, the landscape plan will be consistent
with city codes and regulations. It should be noted however, that
the proposed number of trees and the foundation hedges shown along
the north side of the existing commercial building are beyond the
requirements of the landscape code.
The property is located within the Coastal Village design district
and since it is zoned CBD, proposed improvements are subject to the
CBD Guidelines. In an attempt to comply with the Coastal Village
design district architectural standards, the applicant is proposing
to change the color of the bUilding and add architectural features
and treatments (shutters, lattice, picket fencing, exterior lamps
and multi-pane glass windows). However, unless the staff comments
related to roof and wall elements are addressed, the proposed
improvements do not meet the coastal Village design district
/
TO: Community Redevelopment Advisory Bd.
-2-
December 9, 1993
architectural standards.
As discussed in the attached Planning and Zoning Department
Memorandum No. 93-315, comment 6 regarding enlargement of the
nonconforming structure, the nonconformities that remain, despite
the proposed improvements, include lot size, side yard setbacks and
living area. All other zoning and development regulations
(assuming staff comments are imposed and complied wIth) will be
met. Side yard setbacks cannot be made conforming without removal
of a portion of both the residential and the commercial building.
If the living area were to be increased, there would not be enough
1 and area to meet the drainage, 1 andscaping and parking
improvements proposed. The degree of nonconformity of the lot size
will be reduced with the applicant's lntention to purchase,
improve, and unIfy the title of all the lots on which the
residential and commercial buildings are located. Therefore, it is
the Planning and Zoning Department's opinion that the applicant
will have complied with the zoning and development regulations, to
the maximum extent posslble, and that this request is harmonious
with the intent and purpose of the CBD, does not adversely affect
the public interest and is not a detriment to the health, safety,
and general welfare of residents and workers within the CBD.
Review of Departmental Concerns: Attached are the comments from
the reviewing departments. The Technical Review Committee
recommends that the proJect proceed forward through the approval
process, subj ect to the comments from the Building Department
(Memorandum No. 93-237) and the Planning and Zoning Department
(Memorandum No. 93-315).
Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Department recommends that
the Community Redevelopment Advisory Board recommend approval of
Mr. Hudson's request and forward same to the Community
Redevelopment Agency. Staff's recommendation is subj ect to the
attached staff comments and to the applicant submitting working
drawings to the Building Department that depict the proJ ect in
compliance with the applicable City codes. A motion to approve
should include flndlngs of fact that the waivers (nonconformities
regarding lot area, llving area and side yard setbacks) will not be
detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of persons
working or residing within the CBD and the walvers WIll result in
additional bUSIness actlvity that is harmonious with the general
intent and purpose of the CBD.
tjh
Attachments
A:AgapeRep
xc: Central File
z
FROM:
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-315
Tarnbri J. HeYden-nJ-
Acting Planning and Zoning Director
Dorothy Moore ~
zoning and Site Plans Reviewer
TO:
DATE:
December 9, 1993
RE:
Site Plan Review - 2nd review
Major Site Plan Modification
Project: Agape Cleaners and Laundry
LOCATION:
521 North Federal Highway
APPLICANT: James Hudson
FILE NO.: 780
The amended plans for the above referenced project have been
submi tted and reviewed. The following comments are either comments
that were not satisfactorily corrected on the amended plans or that
were generated as a result of the review of amended plans. All
comments shall be corrected. However, it is acceptable to show
compliance with the outstanding comments on the plans that are
required to be submitted to the Building Department for permit
review. The applicant must understand that the following comments
are comments generated for site plan review and that additional
comments may be forthcoming as a result of the review of the
working drawings and documents submitted to the Building Department
for permits. All permit documents are reviewed for compliance with
the requirements specified in the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances.
1. Identify on the plans the existing and proposed use of the on-
site building structures.
2. Provide the dimensions and total square footage for all the
buildings/structures on the site.
3. Provide elevation view drawings for the building on lots 2 and
3.
4. Indicate on the plans the vehicular access to the carport and
the "open" concrete pad to be used for parking.
5. Please identify and show on the plans the site furnishings/
pedestrian amenities (e.g. bench, trash container) referenced
in the CBD landscape code, Section 7.5-57 (1). j.
6. The existing building on lots 1 and 4 that encroaches the
Federal Highway right-of-way is a nonconforming structure.
Nonconforming structures may be enlarged, as proposed, subject
to CRAB and CRA approval of the addition. Approval shall be
reviewed against the criteria in Section 6.E.7.c. (1) - (4) and
Section 6.E.7.e.(2) as follows:
(1) That granting the application will not adversely affect the
public interest.
(2) Expansion will not be detrimental to the health, safety,
and general welfare of persons working or residing within
the Central Business District.
(3) Approval will to the maximum extent possible bring the
building and the site upon which it is located into
compliance with city regulations and will improve the
physical appearance of the structure.
(4) That the expansion will be in harmony with the general
intent and purpose of the central business district.
3
-2-
To: Tambri J. Heyden
December 10, 1993
(2) All sites will be brought into compliance with the zoning
and development regulations of the city to the maximum
extent possible. The community redevelopment agency may grant
relief from provisions of requirements of the zoning and
development regulations of the city provided that they make
specific findings of fact that the waiver will not be
detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of
persons working or residing within the central business
district and that the waiver will result in additional
business activity that is harmonious with the general
intent and purpose of the central business district.
Since the criteria include bringing the building and site into
compliance with the zoning and development regulations to the
maximum extent possible, attached is an outline of the
nonconformities of the structures, including which regulations are
complied with based on the site plan proposed and staff comments.
7. Pursuant to Section G.E.3 of the Zoning Code, provide a note on
the plans that all utility lines will be underground and any
service equipment required above ground shall be effectively
screened.
8. Provide on the plans the dimension of the height of the fixed
canopy over the main entrance door on the north side of the
building. Note: The minimum required height is 9.0'.
9. There is an inconsistency on the sectional view drawings and
the colored elevation view drawings concerning the entry
canopy. One plan identifies "asphalt shingles". The colored
elevations show "wood shake" finished materials. Either
material is icceptable within the Community Design Plan.
10. To show compliance with the Community Design Plan,
Coastal Village District, roof material, extend the canopy
shown on the north elevations of the plans to include the
west, south and more of the north elevations. Note: The
configuration and shape of what is presently shown is
acceptable but needs to cover more of the structure to
constitute a roof material.
11. To show compliance with the Community Design Plan wall
element, add the diagonal wood board design shown on the
north elevation of the plans to the south and west walls
including the new addition.
12. Provide a detail sectional drawing showing the shutters
on the east side of the building. Since the structure is
nonconforming and building alterations cannot increase the
extent to which a structure is nonconforming, the shutters will
not be allowed to encroach any farther into the side setbacks.
13. Provide a detail sectional drawing showing the diagonal
wood board on the east side of the building. If the board
is encroaching into the setbacks it will have to be removed
from the dra,ling for the reason stated in comment 12 above.
14. Provide a note on the landscape plans that the trees and
groundcover will comply with the Community Design Plan
landscape requirements.
4-
-3-
To: Tambri J. Heyden
December 10, 1993
15. Provide and identify on the landscape plans the
required 3.0' hedge on the west side of the accessway,
between the parking space and N.E. 5th Avenue. Provide
curbing at this location.
16. It is recommended that a 2.0' landscaped strip planted with a
Coco Plum hedge be installed along the east side of the
accessway in front (east side) of the parking space. curbing
and a wheel stop will be required if the landscaping is
installed.
17. Revise the note on the landscape legend to read:
"Hedges to be planted eighteen 18" on center, 24"
high with an 18" spread".
Add note that trees shall have a seven foot (7.0') spread with
a three (3") inch caliper at six (6") inches above grade and
have six (6.0') feet of clear wood.
18. Please provide near the pedestrian entranceway on N.E. 5th
Avenue a flowering tree, selected from the Community Design
Plan Landscape Standards list of trees for the Coastal
Village district. The CBD landscape code and CBD Guidelines
refer to special entrance treatment and flowering trees.
19. To further the intent of special entrance treatments, it is
recommended that groundcover be planted on the east side of
the driveway. Groundcover species shall be selected from
the Coastal Village species list of the community Design Plan
landscape standards.
20. Indicate on the landscape plans the limits of the
pervious/impervious areas on the west side of the property.
21. Revise lighting note on landscape plans to reflect the
following:
a. Site/Parking lot lighting shall provide an
average of one (1) foot candle at ground level and be
energy efficient, high pressure sodium.
b. Pedestrian Lighting shall provide an average
of three quarters (3/4) foot candles at ground level and be
energy efficient, metal halide.
22. Provide and identify on the plans the "safe corner"
intersection at N. E. 5th Avenue and North Federal Highway.
Cross visibility within the safe corner shall be maintained at
both sides at twenty (20.0') feet with landscaping maintained
at a height between three (3.0) feet and six (6.0') feet.
23. Provide a note on the landscape planting specifications
that "plant materials shall be Florida No. 1 or better as
specified in the current "Grades and Standards for Nursery
Plants".
5"
-4-
To: Tambri J. H~yden
December 10, 1993
24. Due to a deficiency in back-up distance for the parking space
along the west property line, it is recommended that
the parking lot be redesigned in the following manner:
a. Three (3) standard parking spaces, to be located along the
south property line.
b. One (1) handicapped parking space, with the access aisle
on the passenger's (north) side, to be located along the
western-most property line.
c. One (1) parking space designated as the carport and one
space located on the existing 9' x 18' concrete slab on
the northwest side of the property.
DM/cmc
c:agape
Attachment
~
Buildlng and site regulations. No building, structure, land.
or water shall be erected. altered, enlarged. or used unless
in conformance with the following regulations:
Minimum lot frontage 75 f~t
Minimum lot depth 100 feet
15,000 square feet
8 feet at first floor leveL
None, at all other floors.
20 feet abutting adjacent pro-
perties at first floor level. 8
feet abutting street or alley at
first floor leveL None, at all
all other floors.
Minimum side yard None, for interior lot lines.
8 feet abutting street or alley
at first floor leveL None. at
all other floors.
M'imYnum, waterfront yard Regardless or the orientation
or the lot or parcel. an 8.foot
setback shall be maintained
from a buildi"'g or stractare
..and any Davigable water.
-'Waterfront setb...... shall be
m.IUSlm!d from the plol"l&t.l
where the body at water fa
under different awnership
than the subject iAY~ liDe.
and measured from the mean
high water line if the body of
water is under the same
ownership as the subject
property.
)fi.,,;TnUDl lot area
Minimum front yard
){;."iTnum rear yard
M.YiYnum lot ,"",\;~.ge 75 per cent.
85 per cent for parking
garages.
~ ..-iTnum structure height 45 feet. not to exceed 4
stories.
Multiple-family dwelling
unit deDSity ft"I.-iTnum
10.8 dwelling units per acre.
Application of residential
density to a parcel shall aot
iupp. :fo. 33
192-\ 4
?
AGAPE CLEANERS AND LAUNDRY
81 feet
100 feet
* 7276
Sinqle-Story 17.11
25.0'
*6' encroachment on west
side yard/.25'encroachment
abutting Federal Highway
MIA
33%
15.5'
NIA
*Nonconformities
APPENDIX A-ZJNING
Living area minimum per
multiple-family dwelling
unit
Canopies and awnings
Movable awnings over
right-of-way
Permanent structural
projections from buildings
Utility lines, mechanical
equipment
Supp. No. 22
Sec. 6
750 square feet.
Canopies or awnings for
pedestrian entrance ways,
with at least 9 feet clear, may
project to the property line in
any required yard.
Movable awnings may extend
not more than 8 feet over a
sidewalk in an adjacent right-
of-way, provided such awning
or IIIQ' part _ thereof shall
maintain a clear height of 9
feet above the sidewalk.
Such awnings extending over
rights-of-way shall be moved
or removed at the request of
the city.
Eaves, sills, belt course, cor.
nices, pilasters, and other
architectural features; gut.
ters, chimneys, and mechani.
cal equipment, may project
not more than 3 feet into any
required yard, provided that
such structures are located
within the property lines and
conform to established cen-
tral business district design
guidelines.
Utility lines shall be installed
underground, and any service
equipment required above
ground shall be effectively
screened.
1924.5
8
AGAPE CLEANERS AND LAUNDRY
*707 sq. ft.
as per staff comment #8
N/A
as per staff comment #7
*Nonco.;nformities
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #93-267
TO~ "H'."Tambri""Heyden. .Acta.nq,~pl~nnirlg~'~&,1"ZOhit1.ti"'D:rreoEor:N'~ ','
FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ: Major Site Plan Modification - Agape Dry Cleaners
DATE: November 29, 1993
The Public Works Department finds no problems at the site listed
above and reconunends that it be forwarded to the Planning and
Development Board/Conununity Redevelopment Advisory Board.
Eichorst
Works Director
REIer
q
-
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-361
TO: Tambri Heyden
Acting Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
James D. White,
City Engineer
p "tPJ
DATE: December 3, 1993
RE: Agape Dry Cleaners Site Plan, Engineering Dept. Memo 193-343
The applicant has responded to Engineering Department Memo #93-343
and provided information and amended drawings as requested. I
therefore recommend that processing of this application continue
and lift the previous "hold" on the application.
JDW/ck
31&1 ~
10
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-237
November 29, 1993
TO:
Tambri Heyden
Acting Plann'
THRU:
Don Jaeger
Building 0 f cial
FROM:
Al Newbold
Deputy Building Official
RE:
TRC COMMENTS - SECOND REVIEW
MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION
AGAPE DRY CLEANERS - 521 N. FEDERAL HWY.
It is our understanding that previous Building Department
comments #2, #4, #5 and #6 are being addressed by other Technical
Review Committee members. The remaining two comments can be met
at permit time if the floor elevation meets code. The building
must meet the Design Guidelines as approved by the Planning
Department.
~/
Al Ne 01
AN : bh
fD) rn @ f'-' ,~
Wr.:..,,~
L-__:-,-_,~
r: ." .e, ,\i~D
ZONING DEPT.
AGAPE
/1
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-210
October 19, 1993
To: Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning irector
Via:
Don Jaeger, Building Officia
From:
Al Newbold, Deputy Building
Re:
TRC COMMENTS
1st Review - Major Site Plan Modification
Project - Agape Dry Cleaners
Location - 521 N. Federal Hwy.
The Building Department has reviewed the plans for the above
referenced project and offers the following comments:
1. The site plan drawn by George Davis differs from the
survey in that it includes a portion of Lots 2 and 3.
This would require a Unity of Title and research on the
balance of Lots 2 and 3 to ascertain whether use of
part of these lots (75' X 34.5') creates other
violations. Submittal requirements include a copy of a
recent survey (the submitted survey is nearly six years
old) .
2. An existing building is shown on Mr. Davis' plan
located on an adjacent lot. This structure may need to
be addressed for code compliance if the entire property
is treated as one parcel. If not, cross parking and
access agreements must be provided.
3. The window openings on the east side of the cleaners
must comply with Table 600. Only show windows and
store fronts are exempt.
4. If all of Lot 3 is not going to be a part of this
proposed property, the landscaping should be provided
on Agape's property unless an agreement between both
property owners has been made.
5. Because the existing building is located on a zero lot
line, the proposed addition would create an expansion
of a nonconforming building which requires City
approval under Appendix A, Section 6.E.7. (Non-
conforming Structures).
6. Appendix A, Section 6.E.2 (Uses Prohibited) lists dry
clean:ng plants as a prohibited use.
AN:mh
AGAPE. me
375-6372
/'A
FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-285 WDC
TO: Planning and zoning Department
FROM: Fire Department
DATE: October 28, 1993
SUBJECT: TRC site plan
AGAPE
We have no objections to this plan.
4i:~ID.~~SH FPO I
BOYNTON BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
WDC:CP
/3
'....
MEMORANDUM
Utilities No. 93-494
TO: Tambri J. Heyden
Acting Planning and
FROM: John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilities
DATE: November 29, 1993
SUBJECT: Agape Dry cleaners, Second Review
Staff has reviewed the above-referenced plan and offers no
comment. It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through
the review process.
The plan will again be reviewed at the time of building permit
for adherence to all City Codes and Specifications.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact
Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404.
/bks
xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor
Peter Mazzella
File
/4
M E M 0 RAN DUM
POLICE #93-190
TO:
Ms. Tambri Heyden
FROM:
Sgt. M. Kirrman
DATE:
December 3, 1993
REF:
2nd Review -
Agape Dry Cleaners
Ms. Heyden,
My comments were satisfied. The plans may proceed to the planning
and development process.
s~!i: :!frm~U?/7~
MK/jb
ill~
" C
6 19m
m
'----
/5
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning:& Zoninq Director
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent ~
/0 - g)7-q 3 J-
Site Plan Review - New Site Plan - 1st Review
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Project: ..iJGAF~ bAt c(,,zV-lyV~~.s
The Recreation and Parks Department has reviewed the
above referenced proj ect. There are no outstanding
recreation related issues on this project.
o \Yl ~ @
(ft,'T 2 7 fgP3
+ PlANNING AND
NING DEPT.
.....
/(0
RECREATION Ii PARK MEMORANDUM 193-486
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning Ii Zoning Director
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist f\(r~
Agape Dry Cleaners - 2nd Review
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
November 22, 1993
There are no existing tree issues for this site. Proceed as
scheduled on the schedule as outlined.
KH:ad
illffi@~~: ID
QA1't'""
PLANNING AND
IN
/7
\
.. \
. ',\
\
\
-----
/8
LOCATION MAP
-AGAPE CLEANERS AND LAUNDRY
~ ,-
~ .,
'~ !.,
III
...
t
:;
IU
...
c
~
11
k
o
l.J
(
- . "..
f
I
I I
" ,.-
...:.
.--
~
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-316
TO: Chairman and Members
Community Redevelopment Advisory Board (CRAB)
FROH:
Dottie Moore
Zoning and site Plan Reviewer
Tambri J. Heyden ~
Acting Planning and Zoning Director
THRU:
DATE:
December 9, 1993
SUBJECT: Agape Cleaners and Laundry - Major Site Plan Modification
File No. 780
STAFF REPORT
Project Name: Agape Cleaners and Laundry
Applicant: James R. Hudson
Agent: N/A
Location: 521 North Federal Highway
Land Use Plan Designation: Local Retail commercial
Zoning Designatlon: Central Business District
Type of Use: Dry Cleaners (cleaning done on premises) and laundry
Number of Units: N/A
Total Building Gross Floor Area:
Existing Commercial Building
EXisting Residential Building
Addition to Commercial Building
Total
1187 sq. ft.
707 sq. ft.
176 Sq. ft.
2070 sq. ft.
Description of ProJect: James R. Hudson, contract purchaser of the
property at 521 North Federal Highway, is requesting approval of a
major site plan modification. There are two existing structures on
the 0.16 acre property, totalling 1,894 square feet. The proposed
modifications include a 176 square foot addition to the southwest
side of the existing commercial building, installation of a parking
lot and landscaping. The number of parking spaces to be provided
is six; four within the new parking lot and two for the existing
residential building, as per code.
Relative to landscaping, if the attached staff comments related to
landscaping are addressed, the landscape plan will be consistent
with city codes and regulations. It should be noted however, that
the proposed number of trees and the foundation hedges shown along
the no~th side of the existing commercial building are beyond the
requirements of the landscape code.
The property is located within the Coastal Village design district
and since it is zoned CBD, proposed improvements are subject to the
CBD Guidelines. In an attempt to comply with the Coastal Village
design district architectural standards, the applicant is proposing
to change the color of the building and add architectural features
and treatments (shutters, lattice, picket fencing, exterior lamps
and multi-pane glass windows). However, unless the staff comments
related to roof and wall elements are addressed, the proposed
improvements do not meet the coastal Village design district
/
TO: Community Redevelopment Advisory Ed.
-2-
December 9, 19~3
architectural standards.
As discussed in the attached Planning and Zoning Department
Hemorandum No. 93-315, comment 6 regarding enlargement of the
nonconforming structure, the nonconformities that remain, despite
the proposed improvements, include lot size, side yard setbacks and
living area. All other zoning and development regulations
(assuming staff comments are imposed and complied with) will be
met. Side yard setbacks cannot be made conforming without removal
of a portion of both the residential and the commercial building.
If the living area were to be increased, there would not be enough
land area to meet the drainage, landscaping and parking
improvements proposed. The degree of nonconformity of the lot size
will be reduced with the applicant's intention to purchase,
improve, and unif~ the title of all the lots on which the
residential and commercial buildings are located. Therefore, it is
the Planning and Zoning Department's opinion that the applicant
will have complied with the zoning and development regulations, to
the maximum extent possible, and that this request is harmonious
with the intent and purpose of the CBD, does not adversely affect
the public interest and is not a detriment to the health, safety,
and general welfare of residents and workers within the CBD.
Review of Departmental Concerns: Attached are the comments from
the reviewing departments. The Technical Review Committee
recommends that the proJect proceed forward through the approval
process, subject to the comments from the Building Department
(Memorandum No. 93-237) and the Planning and Zoning Department
(Memorandum No. 93-315).
Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Department recommends that
the Community Redevelopment Advisory Board recommend approval of
Mr. Hudson's request and forward same to the Community
Redevelopment Agency. Staff's recommendation is subject to the
attached staff comments and to the applicant submitting working
drawings to the Building Department that depict the proj ect in
compliance with the applicable City codes. A motion to approve
should include findings of fact that the waivers (nonconformities
regarding lot area, living area and side yard setbacks) will not be
detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of persons
working or residing within the CBD and the waivers will result in
additional business activity that is harmonious with the general
intent and purpose of the CBD.
tjh
Attachments
A:AgapeRep
xc: Central File
z
FROM:
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-315
Tambr i J. Heyden '79-.4
Acting Planning and Zoning Director
Dorotl.y Moore ~
Zoning and Site Plans Reviewer
TO:
DATE:
December 9, 1993
RE:
Site Plan Review - 2nd review
Major Site Plan Modification
Project: Agape Cleaners and Laundry
LOCATION:
521 North Federal Highway
APPLICANT: James Hudson
FILE NO.: 780
The amended plans for the above referenced project have been
submitted and reviewed. The following comments are either comments
that were not satisfactorily corrected on the amended plans or that
were generated as a result of the review of amended plans. All
comments shall be corrected. However, it is acceptable to show
compliance with the outstanding comments on the plans that are
required to be submitted to the Building Department for permit
review. The applicant must understand that the following comments
are comments generated for site plan review and that additional
comments may be forthcoming as a result of the review of the
working drawings and documents submitted to the Building Department
for permits. All permit documents are reviewed for compliance with
the requirements specified in the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances.
1. Identify on the plans the exi~ting and proposed use of the on-
site building structures.
2. Provide the dimensions and total square footage for all the
buildings/structures on the site.
3. Provide elevation view drawings for the building on lots 2 and
3.
4. Indicate on the plans the vehicular access to the carport and
the "open" concrete pad to be used for parking.
5. Please identify and show on the plans the site furnishings/
pedestrian amenities (e.g. bench, trash container) referenced
in the CBD landscape code, Section 7.5-57 (1). j.
6. The existing building on lots 1 and 4 that encroaches the
Federal Highway right-of-way is a nonconforming structure.
Nonconforming structures may be enlarged, as proposed, subject
to CRAB and CRA approval of the addition. Approval shall be
reviewed agaillst the criteria in Section 6.E.7.c. (1) - (4) and
Section 6.E.7.e.(2) as follows:
(1) That granting the application will not adversely affect the
public interest.
(2) Expansion will not be detrimental to the health, safety,
and general welfare of persons working or residing within
the Central Business District.
(3) Approval will to the maximum extent possible bring the
building and the site upon which it is located into
compliance with city regulations and will improve the
physical appearance of the structure.
(4) That the expansion will be in harmony with the general
intent and purpose of the central business district.
3
-2-
To: Tambri J. Heyden
December 10, 1993
(2) All sites will be brought into compliance with the zoning
and development regulations of the city to the maximum
extent possible. The communi ty redevelopment agency may grant
relief from provisions of requirements of the zoning and
development regulations of the city provided that they make
specific findings of fact that the waiver will not be
detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of
persons wor\ing or residing within the central business
district and that the waiver will result in additional
business activity that is harmonious with the general
intent and purpose of the central business district.
Since the criteria include bringing the building and site into
compliance with the zoning and development regulations to the
maximum extent possible, attached is an outline of the
nonconformities of the structures, including which regulations are
complied with based on the site plan proposed and staff comments.
7. Pursuant to Section G.E.3 of the Zoning Code, provide a note on
the plans that all utility lines will be underground and any
service equipment required above ground shall be effectively
screened.
8. Provide on the plans the dimension of the height of the fixed
canopy over the main entrance door on the north side of the
building. Note: The minimum required height is 9.0'.
9. There is an inconsistency on the sectional view drawings and
the colored elevation view drawings concerning the entry
canopy. One plan identifies "asphalt shingles". The colored
elevations show "wood shake" finished materials. Either
material is xcceptable within the Community Design Plan.
10. To show compliance with the Community Design Plan,
Coastal Village District, roof material, extend the canopy
shown on the north elevations of the plans to include the
west, south and more of the north elevations. Note: The
configuration and shape of what is presently shown is
acceptable but needs to cover more of the structure to
constitute a roof material.
11. To show compliance with the Community Design Plan wall
element, add the diagonal wood board design shown on the
north elevation of the plans to the south and west walls
including the new addition.
12. Provide a detail sectional drawing showing the shutters
on the east side of the building. Since the structure is
nonconforming and building alterations cannot increase the
extent to which a structure is nonconforming, the shutters will
not be allowed to encroach any farther into the side setbacks.
13. Provide a detail sectional drawing showing the diagonal
wood board on the east side of the building. If the board
is encroachinq into the setbacks it will have to be removed
from the dra.ling for the reason stated in comment 12 above.
14. Provide a note on the landscape plans that the trees and
groundcover will comply with the Community Design Plan
landscape requirements.
4
-3-
To: Tambri J. Heyden
December 10, 1993
15. Provide and identify on the landscape plans the
required 3.0' hedge on the west side of the accessway,
between the parking space and N.E. 5th Avenue. Provide
curbing at this location.
16. It is recommended that a 2.0' landscaped strip planted with a
Coco Plum hedge be installed along the east side of the
accessway ih front (east side) of the parking space. curbing
and a wheel stop will be required if the landscaping is
installed.
17. Revise the note on the landscape legend to read:
"Hedges to be planted eighteen 18" on center, 24"
high with an 18" spread".
Add note that trees shall have a seven foot (7.0') spread with
a three (3") inch caliper at six (6") inches above grade and
have six (6.0') feet of clear wood.
18. Please provide near the pedestrian entranceway on N.E. 5th
Avenue a flowering tree, selected from the Community Design
Plan Landscape Standards list of trees for the Coastal
Village district. The caD landscape code and CBD Guidelines
refer to special entrance treatment and flowering trees.
19. To further the intent of special entrance treatments, it is
recommended that groundcover be planted on the east side of
the driveway. Groundcover species shall be selected from
the Coastal Village species list of the Community Design Plan
landscape standards.
20. Indicate on the landscape plans the limits of the
pervious/impervious areas on the west side of the property.
21. Revise lighting note on landscape plans to reflect the
following:
a. Site/Parking lot lighting shall provide an
average of one (1) foot candle at ground level and be
energy efficient, high pressure sodium.
b. Pedestrian Lighting shall provide an average
of three quarters (3/4) foot candles at ground level and be
energy efficient, metal halide.
22. Provide and identify on the plans the "safe corner"
intersection at N. E. 5th Avenue and North Federal Highway.
Cross visibility wi thin the safe corner shall be maintained at
both sides at twenty (20.0') feet with landscaping maintained
at a height: between three (3.0) feet and six (6.0') feet.
23. Provide a note on the landscape planting specifications
that "plant materials shall be Florida No. 1 or better as
specified in the current "Grades and Standards for Nursery
Plants".
5"
-4-
To: Tambri J. H~yden
December 10, 1993
24. Due to a deficiency in back-up distance for the parking space
along the west property line, it is recommended that
the parking lot be redesigned in the following manner:
a. Three (3) standard parking spaces, to be located along the
south property line.
b. One (1) handicapped parking space, with the access aisle
on the passenger's (north) side, to be located along the
western-mJst property line.
c. One (1) parking space designated as the carport and one
space located on the existing 9' x 18' concrete slab on
the northwest side of the property.
DM/cmc
c:agape
Attachment
~
Buildlng and site regulations. No building, structure. land.
or water shall be erected. altered. enlarged. or used unless
in conformance with the following regulations:
Minimum lot frontage 75 f~t
Minimum lot depth 100 feet
Ml"hY'lUD1 lot area
15,000 square feet
8 feet at first floor level.
None, at all other floors.
20 feet abutting adjacent pr0-
perties at first floor level. 8
feet abutting street or alley at
first floor leveL None. at all
all other floors.
Min..imum side yard None. for interior lot lines.
8 feet abutting street or alley
at first floor leveL None, at
all other floors.
.
Minimum waterfront yard RegarcUess of the orientation
of the lot or parcel. an S.foot
setback shall be maintained
from a building or stractare
..and any Davigable water.
-- Watufront setbfJ"lro. shall be
lIuusured. from the p1"~ t.)
where the body of water W
under different ownership
than the subject ~~,,~ty Une.
and measured from the mean
high water Une if the body of
water is under the same
ownership lIS the subject
property.
Minimum front yard
M;Y'I;'I"I'Ium rear yard
~bYi'l"l'lum lot IOU n:u...ge 75 per cent.
85 per cent for parkiq
prages.
Mu:imum st:rw:ture height 45 feet. not to uc:eed "
stories.
Multiple-family dwelling
unit density ftUIYi'l"l'lWD
10.S dwelling units per acre.
Application of residential
density to a parcel shall aot
II~ :io. S3
192-' ~
7
AGAPE CLEANERS AND LAUNDRY
81 feet
100 feet
* 7276
Sinqle-Story 17.1'
25.0'
*6' encroachment on west
side yard/.25'encroachment
abutting Federal Highway
N/A
33%
15.5'
N/A
*Nonconformities
AGAPE CLEANERS AND LAUNDRY
APPENDIX A-Z"JNING
Sec. 6
Living area minimum per
multiple-family dwelling
unit
Canopies and awnings
Movable awnings over
right-of-way
Permanent structural
projections from buildings
Utility lines, mechanical
equipment
Supp. No. 22
750 square feet. *707 sq. ft.
Canopies or awnings for
pedestrian entrance ways,
with at least 9 feet clear, may
project to the property line in
any required yard. as per staff corrunent #8
Movable awnings may extend
not more than 8 feet over a
sidewalk in an adjacent right-
of-way, provided such awning
or &IQ" part _ thereof shall
maintain a clear height of 9
feet above the sidewalk.
Such awnings extending over
rights-of-way shall be moved
Jr removed at the request of
the city.
N/A
Eaves, sills, belt course, cor-
nices, pilasters, and other
architectural features; gut-
ters, chimneys, and mechani-
cal equipment, may project
not more than 3 feet into any
required yard, provided that
such structures are located
within the property lines and
conform to established cen.
tral business district design
guidelines.
as per staff corrunent #7
Utility lines shall be installed
underground, and any service
equipment required above
ground shall be etTectively
screened.
1924.5
*Nonco:n.formi ties
8
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM *93-267
TO: .'w, -.. -Tambri:'"Heyden. .Act:i.nlii,pfannlrigi.?&'", zon:i..h~'oDfrec€oit-.".-~
FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ: Major Site Plan Modification - Agape Dry Cleaners
DATE: November 29, 1993
The Public Works Department finds no problems at the site listed
above and recommends that it be forwarded to the Planning and
Development Board/Community Redevelopment Advisory Board.
Eichorst
Works Director
RE/cr
q
-
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-361
TO: Tambri Heyden
Acting Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
James D. White,
City Engineer
p'lfbJ
DATE: December 3, 1993
RE: Agape Dry Cleaners Site Plan, Engineering Dept. Memo 193-343
The applicant has responded to Engineering Department Memo #93-343
and provided information and amended drawings as requested. I
therefore recommend that processing of this application continue
and lift the previous "hold" on the application.
JDW/ck
3gB ~
OEe
10
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-237
November 29, 1993
TO:
Tambri Heyden
Acting Plann' g Director
FROM:
Al Newbold
Deputy Building Official
THRU:
Don Jaeger
Building 0 f cial
RE:
TRC COMMENTS - SECOND REVIEW
MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION
AGAPE DRY CLEANERS - 521 N. FEDERAL HWY.
It is our understanding that previous Building Department
comments #2, #4, #5 and #6 are being addressed by other Technical
Review Committee members. The remaining two comments can be met
at permit time if the floor elevation meets code. The building
must meet the Design Guidelines as approved by the Planning
Department.
~F/
Al Ne 01
AN : bh
fD) ~ @ 1-' - ;~
Uor::-:,~
L-.._:----__~
r: .- .e,i\iW
ZGNlliG OEPT.
AGAPE
II
To:
Via:
From:
Re:
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-210
October 19, 1993
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning irector
Al Newbold, Deputy Building
Don Jaeger, Building Officia
TRC COMMENTS
1st Review - Major Site Plan Modification
Project - Agape Dry Cleaners
Location - 521 N. Federal Hwy.
The Building Department has reviewed the plans for the above
referenced project and offers the following comments:
1. The site plan drawn by George Davis differs from the
survey in that it includes a portion of Lots 2 and 3.
This would require a Unity of Title and research on the
balance of Lots 2 and 3 to ascertain whether use of
part of these lots (75' X 34.5') creates other
violations. Submittal requirements include a copy of a
recent survey (the submitted survey is nearly six years
old) .
AN:mh
AGAPE. TRC
2. An existing building is shown on Mr. Davis' plan
located on an adjacent lot. This structure may need to
be addressed for code compliance if the entire property
is treated as one parcel. If not, cross parking and
access agreements must be provided.
3. The window openings on the east side of the cleaners
must comply with Table 600. Only show windows and
store fronts are exempt.
4. If all of Lot 3 is not going to be a part of this
proposed property, the landscaping should be provided
on Agape's property unless an agreement between both
property owners has been made.
5. Because the existing building is located on a zero lot
line, the proposed addition would create an expansion
of a nonconforming building which requires City
approval under Appendix A, Section 6.E.7. (Non-
conforming Structures).
6. Appendix A, Section 6.E.2 (Uses Prohibited) lists dry
clean~ng plants as a prohibited use.
375-6372
/')..
FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-285 WDC
TO: Planning and zoning Department
FROM: Fire Department
DATE: october 28, 1993
SUBJECT: TRC site Plan
AGAPE
We have no objections to this plan.
k I~ !Jf)~
WILL~AH D. CAVANAUGH FPO I
BOYNTON BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
HDC:CP
/3
'.....
MEMORANDUM
Utilities No. 93-494
TO: Tambri J. Heyden
Acting Planning and
FROM: John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilities
DATE: November 29, 1993
SUBJECT: Agape Dry Cleaners, Second Review
staff has reviewed the above-referenced plan and offers no
comment. It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through
the review process.
The plan will again be reviewed at the time of building permit
for adherence to all City Codes and Specifications.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact
Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404.
jbks
xc:
Clyde "Skip" Milor
Peter Mazzella
File
/1
M E M 0 RAN DUM
POLICE #93-190
TO:
Ms. Tambri Heyden
FROM:
sgt. M. Kirrman
DATE:
December 3, 1993
REF:
2nd Review -
Agape Dry Cleaners
Ms. Heyden,
My comments were satisfied. The plans may proceed to the planning
and development process.
"fri- III fu~il~
Sgt M. Kirrrn I
Ml\/jb
,. c
'00
ill I
6 1993
....--
/S"
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning:& Zoninq Director
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent ~
/0 - g)7-q 3 J-
Site Plan Review - New Site Plan - 1st Review
Project: ..iJGAF~ bAy C(.,ZV-lyVi2"~.s
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
The Recreation and Parks Department has reviewed the
above referenced project. There are no outstanding
recreation related issues on this project.
D\Yl~ @
oor 2 7 fg~!J
:1- PlANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
.."
/(0
RECREATION Ii PARK MEMORANDUM 193-486
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist f\(r~
Agape Dry Cleaners - 2nd Review
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
November 22, 1993
There are no existing tree issues for this site. Proceed as
scheduled on the schedule as outlined.
KH:ad
ill ffi ~ ffi! ~ 1~ ill
QA1't'""
PLANNING AND
IN
/7
\
.. \
. ;\
"
-----
/8
LOCATION MAP
AGAPE CLEANERS AND LAUNDRY
~ ,-
~ "
III
...
t
:;
------- .....----
IU
...
c
~
11
k
o
l.J
. : ~
I-
,.
. ,
'.
(
.. ~ ....
,-
- ,
.. ~ .
'- ,
'- -
,;.
j~!;
:~::
:"~:;
I ::
:~ :.--
--..:.; .= ;~ ':'
/l._;/~:;-::~"";-::"j'::-:~:r::'
- (~!/~'o /'1 1/8
H~__'''~_'} i:~: "1111
j .: 0 -400. 800 FE~T
:[~ll 1~N.,oI "
,. -
PROJEC'f 'l'ITLE:
DESCRIPTION:
'l'YPE:
DATE REC'D:
'l'RACKING LOG - ~l'l\,E PLAN REV.lEW SUBMl'l"!'AL
, \
/I C. ~ft;. j)!?y C (c;~,.J~~
oltlSTiN6 iJtJlL6J~ - \ \
N~~_ SITE PLAN \ ~ MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION
J':!L..s1-5~.3 AMOUNT: I 7.:91. "D RECEIPT NO.: dbr'l'/
FILENO.:
P" 730
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
TWELVE (12) SETS SUBMITTED:
COLORED ELEVATIONS REC'O:
y~
Nt.>
(Plans shall be pre-assembled. The Planning & zoning Dept. will number each
sheet of their set. The planning Dept. set will be used to check the
remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match.)
* ~ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
APPLICATION & SUBMITTAL:
DATE:
ACCEPTED
---DENIED
DATE:
DATE OF LETTER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES:
2nd SUBMIT'I'AL
ACCEPTED
DENIED
DATE:
DATE:
DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER:
REVIEWER'S NAME:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
(Label TRC Departments on each set of plans)
-ree - /~r;/'i3
DATE AND MEMO NUMBER OF MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW.
RETURN DATE: /Op.~/ 'I 3
# .
DATE SENT:
/OftJ/Q3
, ,
MEMO NUMBER: 93 -~,,,
1st REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED
MEMO # / DATE / "c"
~/II.."'~~$
9.3-,J.jo / 10/");/'13 / j<:....s
~~~~tl ~ /~~r/fJ ~ ty~
/ 9.1- 'f~ / I~q) /-11E-_
PLANS
Utile No
P . W . AI 0
Parks ~
Fire ~
Police r~
MEMO # / DATE / "c" PLANS
93-'t~ / /oj.)~7] / Vt.( Planninl} y..~
'3 -.;)/fo / I~ -i?1 /~ Building ~o
/ ~.....~ '7 / ~...s Engineer,c/'li ~o
3 - r.;s, I v!J.is / Engineer Alo
tl3-/I,B iID;-~~ /~ Forester ft:s
)
TYPE OF VARIANCE(S)
DATE OF MEETING:
DATE OF LETTER SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS:
(Aesthetic Review App., dates of board mtgs. & checklist sent out w/ comments
NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID:
DATE 12 COMPLETE SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW:
(Must be assembled. Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents)
COLORED ELEVATIONS REC I D: ---LJ,Iov. /8 /9Q3
.I
MEMO
DATE
SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM 2nd REV~W. "\
SENT: N()&I. 19 I '4f~ MEMO #: 1 - do- 9<1
"J
2nd REVIEW RECOMMENDATION/DENIAL
RETURN DATE: N()tJ. '10 1"1-
~
. util .
,P.W.
Parks
Fire
~ Police
PLANS MEMO # /iiiTE /"RLD" PLANS MEMO #
Jlc,5 Cf.~-'f7'1_/ . 1 Planning
YIf:& q3-d.b, /. ~ 0/3/r 'Building ;/6~ q?, -~~n
/ /,Enginee:r; JJtIGJ 93 -: 3'1'1
/ / 'lEngineer ~ ~~:.. '93 -.11/3
Y6S 13 - 190 / /"./lp/~.? / !< .Forester YeS f'S - ~8G.
,
DATE
/"R/J.)ll
LETTER TO APPLICANT REGARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS
PLACED AT THE PROPERTY DATE SENT/SIGNS INSTALLED:
SCHEDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD
CC/CRA
DATE APPROVAL LETTER SENT:
A: '1'RACKING. SP
'.
"
.
'"
:~ ,
~,
,>
- '
\. \
-----
---
-----
,_._~~
~,_..--