Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS _AEMORANDUM TO Mr. James ('.,()lden DATE 11/02/88 ,.1\.11 "ROM Lt. Dale S. Hamnack 5U8JR'CT Causeway Square As per our discussion at the Technical Review Board meeting on 01 November 88, I am reccmnending the followinq: 1. Stop sign at intersection at NW corner of Walgreens 2. Change all signage to reflect reversal of one way traffic to the r~ar of the property. . ", ;m:;;L Lt. Dale S. Hamnack DSH/lav f ,~ p[ JJ~ (j) Pt!-= @ tJLJZC (]) (G)jCr ( (j) s, T fit- t;. R tJ V E S f'f 0 F' P :r AI c... {E AI' T!5 !:::.. SOIAJrRE FooT A-t.E foR (06L/3/(S To T/l/:= ).) 1~A-J2 (9/: 7ltE _'J rt 0 t p :r AI ~ c'" E AI r E;2 /! uS T fiE .:r AI C{ fA ;J [=: j) .l/ll litES Ck fA~;e /.3 r a 0 / -1- tt E {Ai { P( LA- r .:r 0 A/ ;=-0/< ;- If E J"ito I / ~--j;~ C L'= A/ ll3/( I j( 0;> /-'= j( ..5.r Ii AI A- ~ E r f It V 1:=-/1 E- Jv' T )1 A- j( !--:; AI tLf rC? R t="ti;f l=S- S ~... ..-.--.....-..-... -- _. L Jr)/ r: & AI /0 ? t"Z: j.) I If WI ()? .J tA It T r a J.! /V t) A/ t Y ) PUL!; -/70(.-1)// Ell (to.ffr:rAltl J1-s cJ?fC2..5i=j) To j]Lj)? t l/otfA/7l=-J) t:r?./'f-TIJJu.. _~lfout.j) BE l'ROf/J:f>/.:-j) )-to-UCi. j-It/3 J2 {='/!-J( o,F Tit E {EN T L-::/:,-' w Ic:r u If r :;:-/Vl<.- To 8 E j)i>t)E~ rL':::jJ JA/wA-x j) L!Atfr:rAlt.. PE1Arts To 1.'?/3 fRoV-TP,Ejj !!< (;] Ft~-= R r ( 0 fA! IJ ;.: (.( /0 /) i~ J) r L .It /;= A (-/-A r IF JJ fie { [;=-> 5. f,fs f I1t Air A-toi/?- f'>. o. w, (7A/E Foj! ,FrfPJ.:,f At.. iJ w)I AA/j) OLp jJ J J-JE ffwy. 6, /12ot'/..:::Rrl OW)/~fZ To/)!-=rJ':;-{Are- ;?'cY,w, ro/( Oc..j) P-iJ-.:rE (IlA/f. Y"o f~ff-T /1<0/1 ([3J)f775,kLrllt-: t/2Foj( To rifE lf5r/tA)/[E &f ~ k b-LOc;, lE/2A-I- T 7 Pfv't~{t:lt[!-A 70 {Iff-(} )(.1/, w. wij)rlt FoR. O[jj !):r)l.)~j3. /fwy To !f-l (.? FAr)j t:- F JA- >:r f3J L i ;- 'I C7 r- PRO f&3(3 Jj ;< ok/> W A- y J Ii F'/! 0 v f)[ E )j T-~ )' ;J fV E[ ~ t/~)( ;0 (o);}: (. {!-'=-j':-T TM R J/ tA-)/f~ .J)ll& /1.1-1 A/ _5'/foFrTJv?- (f~),;rt-=f( Pl<rv!3(JJA-Y f;fo/t _5~W .lffl!:o./rtlf- O)t/ 0 [/) /, J JJ- f !f//l7> 1 KOJtp w!j- /' A-~[) -~l u. JI/f{ :r J1 /~~)o [; J:/tE.A/J-s P f r~ t /'t 1);;3 (5 r CJ fJ E J/L~ c r5 __5 5/f)( r 15/ j.- E -l-r It f .5 ("1f;V/f- )? S l & ii /5"- ([)J1/'c E J E J) /~l(J c? R To 7 HE {/ t EJI-7)/ Ii. o,F 7ft;: 5jt~ /,p;rlJ([ C'EIVT I: R !O, If, / J. ' r fv;(AJ @, {Ntl~ tfYf)/@ ,~ f3e D (;, (!:j k w:rJJ (!!J f w, (jj) PiAlt, @ f X:[.5 T J )J tL j) R v {> [IA l< {3 ~ 0)/;= F j) f-/! J;- (, /f w .Y To B ~ R E )( cl V c P /tAl)) j.\ F (CJA.;_5 T R fA C r [::Jj J C7 /i? (,1 v:r PEA- {e: Jv TIAI (j c:Ju.s /? J1- 1.5!:-/) (fA /? i? A-Al,L) s..:[p Fit! /1-1. Ie fL-Jt-TTJ))~ l.s J<Eau:rtL=p TFCJuT{o!5 A/?'L7:.Toj?E JtJrJ); T Jr:rJ/ ED a);P?!< S cl))-/? Jr T E cywA/J:;Ls" If.:rl F/?c//j /1Jrl/t! S If a P Pl)./4- (e.AJ r pI? r flEA)? c!Jf _C;ftd/tP+/v~ (E)Jr[:R j& IfJrVE ~ /!trxc/'J(.TA-l) j(oClF rXi:hT/1E/ilT T6J (&.Jv'LEA-t. /!l:C!f/tAJJ(A-C I-~ () (;{ J t/1/3 ;1/ r A-)Jj) F cJ j\," ;11 0 j.s f Il:r r -F~ /1- T :{ 0 /V II {t:1)J{, DLO{;" wJrU.. To J5~ ftA-cEP A- A.rAi, ;2 J r)2o/t lA-v tf3!( T 7 LJ PES itS ;.ZEd al f~f5P is'7 cc?!) L-. life- ;;?tJElJ If (GJ.AJC, j?L/~. whee. L=)./{f(o.Jr{ffJ::~ (JJN fltk'/::JAlt<.. A-f2j..;:ASj 1>/:. f lJ E VJ It '/) t j) uJ11 t~ r e- j( !/+ j) ;1-(0#( w;:.z3.T [lo t{.il/j).Jr/C Y /tlfJrRt:r/{(.5fJrt[3S Atok4. WE3( f,f.ttJ?ERTI j)oalVjJ/r,RY R Etl CA J" tC E j1J}J. t2f ! /t-JI j)__c;c)r P E -> 112 J P Sltow 5ErgJr{k.5 Foj( SIC, j)l-::PT. .sToRE . ! )/ ffD Co)/ r r)j UP 3S J. j: ! tJr,A/Jjs (/rP E 5" T/?:r I~ Ate;' AIeL -. l'L-=,R:r!1 ErE R ;f([ Ess /(oA-j) j)1AJ1P~t;TEf~ ,J/fA-1? Ov-TtoT E :r-~ )lorJtI'I~f.otN:r/rrELI t.. CJ( ArE j) II- U [1r1VJf. c.lt P t: () A-f? l3/t ~ !f2;;-Jr- s 7)/ t/t-RlI);C- ! &' r (0 BE lKCiTEL {/3P 8'7 ('ff')cJt.l5EJ) (v.kJ/.JJ/tc fc,,)/4. CJj) JNTfR:(o/\ lltR./::f/i?t !ollhT/.-=j(S/:CT-TdN ).PI>1-(EAlT To f;,fr.lrJ L rcA [I f)1t-~ r/1tf.:."o?~R JrLrCiA//1EJ/T p,w.(jjj ,.. :3 -;:;t: . 2 t, PfAI1f5 ! J: R ~)/ S-/:. 51))): tJ F [;V.f;(l;{; j) r;:.rE .5/toV<l-{) Jj l~ AJrfi tlY fJ PJrRkJ)jtc SPIf-{f: CklovtT ft-IJ3ACC:AiT ro I?L;::rA--F[. k" T-s. J#-t-O!< t( r: c r /1 1\ PJLrV E . Ttt R fA Jr T 1; L Dr:;, /~ tv:r [[ A) E&' fAr;C /.- cc;Oh<v-F T rc.A<~',- 1I.> E A- P//,) 0 vA- L P ( {' -117 (0 [.I(!V[ -TL-. STAFF COMMENTS THE GROVE SHOPPING CENTER SITE PLAN MODIFICATION Engineering Department: See attached memo. Utilities Department: See attached memo. Police Department: See attached memo. Public Works Department: See attached memo. Planning Department: See attached memos ( 2) . Forester: See attached memo. Building Department: See attached memo. M E M 0 RAN DUM July 2, 1986 TO: Mr. Jim Golden Planning Department FROM: Tom Clark City Engineer RE: Site Plans for the Grove COMMENTS: 1. A permit for the construction in Old Dixie Highway will be required from the County. 2. Drainage calculations submitted to the Water Management District are requested. 3. An extruded curb is shown. More substantial construction is recommended but is not a code requirement at this time. 4. Dimensions required to locate the limits of the landscaped areas and edges of parking lots without scaling or refering to other drawings should be added to the paving grading and drainage plans. 5. Radii should be indicated on the plans for all turnouts and landscaped areas. 6. The required R.O.W. deed to the County for additional R,O.W. should be prepared and submitted. 7. Traffic control devices must conform to the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices", a national and state standard where the general public is invited. 8. Section F-F should show that the minimum roadway is 27 ft. ~v eA-' ~ d~ Tom Clark TAC:ck MEMORANDUM TO : Car~en Annunziato, Planning Director DATE: June 30, 1986 SUBJECT: TRB cO~Ments - The Grove This DepartMent's approval is conditional upon the following changes in the plans: 1> Additional gate valves and post indicator valves will be needed at various locations in the water distribution systeM. Z> Fire hydrants Must be a MiniMUM 10 feet frOM the building. Water ~ains Must be no closer than 15 feet to the building or proposed coolers. 3) Easel'lents will only including sprinkler will be needed for all water and sewer lines. The City Maintain Main line sewers, and water lines up to and the Meters, hydrants and post indicator valves for lines. 4) The water Main connection to the existing line on Old Dixie Highway Must be planned for early Morning hours, and closely coordinated with this DepartMent. We reCOMMend that the two valves and the tee be pre-asseMbled. then installed into the existing line as a unit. Sincerely, ~. ..' g7 I~// /~~?a( Peter V. Mazzella, Uti 1 ity Engineer cc: File .-- . .AEMORANDUM TO Planning Dept. Attn: Mr. J. Golden DATE: J u 1 Y 2, 1 986 FILE FROM SU8J~CT Lt. Dale S. Hammack Pol ice Dept. Grove Shopping Center As per the discussion at the T.R.B. meeting of July 1, 1986, the following changes are recommended: 1. Pole mounting, photocell activate perimeter lighting located to the rear (West and North sides) facing toward the building. 2. Extend Northerly the widened throat of intersection at main entrance. 3. Align the intersection in the North East corner of the parking lot. /I €le~Ck Police Dept. DH:as MEMORANDUM July 2, 1986 TO: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato Planning Director RE: The Grove Shopping Center Site Plan Modification Shared Parking Allocation Section 11-H (13) of the Zoning Code contains the following, recently-amended provision for shared parking: 13. Parking spaces required in this Ordinance for one use or structure may be allocated in part or in whole for the required parking spaces of another use or structure if quantitative evidence is provided showing that parking demand for the different uses or structures would occur on different days of the week or at different hours. Quantitative evidence shall include but not be limited to the following: (a) Field studies and traffic counts prepared by a traffic consultant experienced in parking studies. (b) Adjustments for seasonal variations. (c) Estimates for peak parking demand based on statistical data furnished by the Urban Land Institiute or some other recognized land planning and design organization. All data furnished must be statistically valid. In addition, a minimum buffer of 10% shall be provided to ensure that a sufficient number of parking spaces are available at times of peak hour use. Said buffer is to be calculated based on the following formula: surplus shared parking1 Buffer = - - - 2 X 100% on-site + shared parking provided 1 1Shared parking spaces not required by the City of Boynton Beach zoning regulations for the proposed use. 2parking spaces required for the proposed use as per the City of Boynton Beach zoning regulations. Evidence for joint allocation of required space shall be submitted to the Technical Review Board, and approval of joint allocation of required parking spaces shall be made by the Council, after review and recommendations by the Planning and Zoning Board. With respect to the above, Goldenholz-Fischer Architects and Planners, agent for the Grove'partners Limited, are requesting approval of a shared parking allocation in connection with a site plan modification to the previously approved shopping center. The shopping center is to be located at the intersection of Federal Highway and Old Dixie Highway, west side. The applicant is requesting approval of the shared parking allocation in order to allow for the addition of an 11,431 square foot cinema which would include four screens and 877 fixed seats. The proposed modification would include 153,156 square feet of retail floor space and the 877 seat (11,431) square foot cinema. The parking requirement for the retail shopping center is 153,156 f 200 = 766 spaces while the parking requirement for the cinema is 877 seats T 4 = 220 spaces. The proposed site plan would provide for 818 on-site parking spaces which would meet the code requirement for the retail floor space with the remaining 52 parking spaces being allocated to the cinema. The additional parking required for the 877 seat cinema (220 - 52 = 168 spaces) is to be shared parking. According to the Shared Parking Study prepared by Keith and Schnars, P.A. for the Grove Shopping Center, the peak hour demand for parking for both the retail shopping center and the cinema combined would occur on Saturday afternoons between the hours of 1:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. This projection of peak hour parking demand is based on Urban Land Institute data which has been adjusted in part to incorporate site specific conditions. Based on this worst case scenario, the highest parking accumulation for the retail portion of the shopping center would occur at approximately 2:00 p.m. Saturday afternoon and would require 574 of the required 766 parking spaces required by code, leaving a statistical surplus of 192 parking spaces to be shared by the cinema as follows: On-site parking allocated to cinema Shared parking available from retail Total parking available to cinema at peak = 52 spaces = 192 spaces = 244 spaces 2 The above analysis indicates that sufficient parking is available at peak hour use to meet the zoning code requirement for the cinema (220 spaces) leaving a statistical surplus of 24 shared parking spaces to be allocated toward the calculation of the required 10% buffer as follows: 24 52 + 168 x 100% = 10.9% Therefore, given the worst case scenario of total parking accumulation (Saturdays at 2:00 p.m.), the shared parking allocation for the Grove Shopping Center would still allow for a statistical surplus of at least 24 parking spaces. On Tuesday, July 1, 1986 the Technical Review Board met at which time they recommended approval of the shared parking allocation as submitted. It was the consensus of the TRB that the proposed shared parking allocation was prepared and documented in accordance with code requirements and that there was sufficient opportunity available for shared parking to occur on-site given the mix of uses in the proposed shopping center. ~A~-S:- ~~ flat 3 MEMORANDUM 2 July 1986 TO: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato Planning Director RE: The Grove Shopping Center - Staff Commments Please be advised of the following comments from the Planning Department in connection with the above-referenced request for a site plan modification. 1. Square footage for coolers located to the rear of the shopping center are to be included in square footage and parking calculations. Additional coolers to be placed to the rear of the shopping center will require site plan approval. 2. Lighting details are to be provided. 3. All landscaped areas within and adjacent to the parking lot access aisles are to be protected by six-inch raised concrete curbing, 4. Interior parking lot intersection adjacent to retail "A" is to have a proper alignment. 5. A proper transition is to be provided at the egress to the main shopping center driveway in the vicinity of the interior intersection, northwest corner. 6. The 10% buffer required by the zoning regulations for shared parking is to be maintained upon incorporation of the staff comments. ~~~ /bks . , __\EMORANDUM TO Carmen Annunziato Planning Director DATE' July 1, 1986 FILE FROM Kevin J. Hallahan Forester/Horticulturist SUBJECT The Grove Shopping Center Site-Plan Modification This memorandum is in reference to the tree management plan which will be affected by the site plan modifications, I discussed the changes with the landscape architect and felt it would be advis- able to show how any of the proposed changes would affect trees as outlined in the plan. An addendum would be submitted to the plan showing the trees affected. The newly installed landscaping would also be affected and should be addressed on the landscape plan. The tree management plan will remain intact and reflect the approved changes. Also, there should be a 2/ foot landscape strip behind the Junior Department Store. All landscaped areas should be protected in the parking area with a six inch non-mountable curb, .24 . ~~-/7t':~. 'fl a L L'~--/'--4,-,/ Kev in J. all ahan 6-^--- KJH:ad = I". ~: KEITH and ": ~ ~= SCHNARS June 24, 1986 Mr. William Walsh, P.E. Florida Department of Transportation 780 Southwest 24th Street Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33315 RE: Section 93010: S.R. 5 (U.S. 1) at Old Dixie Hwy. Signal Warrants Analysis Our Project No. 11824.01J Dear Mr. Walsh: On February 7, 1986, Keith and Schnars, P.A., submitted a signal justification study for the above referenced intersection to serve the Boynton Beach Shopping Center. As the attached letter indi- cates, the Department concurred with our proposal. Since that time, the development, now referred to as "The Grove," has experienced a minor site plan change. Traffic volumes as a result of the site plan change are reflected on the table below. SITE PLAN COMPARISON Boynton Beach Ctr. The Grove Daily Trips 10,717 10,863 PM In 458 441 PM Out 490 470 As shown, The Grove will generate an additional 146 daily trips as compared to the Boynton Beach Shopping Center. The peaking charac- teristics of The Grove will result in slightly fewer peak hour trips. It should also be noted that the Boynton Beach Shopping Center study indicated that ten percent (10%) of the project traffic exit- ing the site would do so at the northerly access on U.S. 1, with five percent (5%) being left turns. The City of Boynton Beach has since prohibited this left turn movement. Left turning vehicles previously assigned to this access will now exit the site at Dixie Highway and will become left turning vehicles onto Federal Highway. This will increase the left turning volumes at the subject intersec- tion to fifty-five percent (55%) of the total. 6500 North Andrews Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309-2132 . (305) 776-1616 - : 11':. ~ :. : ~ ~= Page Two - June 24, 1986 William Walsh, P.E., FDOT The Grove (11824.01J) In conclusion, The Grove will generate more daily trips than the Boynton Beach Shopping Center. Volumes assigned in the afternoon peak hour as left turning vehicles at the subject intersection will increase from 245 to 259. The previous study indicated three separate signal warrants were met. This will also hold true with The Grove as additional traffic will be generated. We are, therefore, proceeding under the assumption that the Depart- ment's approval for signalization at Federal Highway and Dixie Highway applies to the revised conditions. We are proceeding on behalf of the owner of The Grove to design and construct the signal so that it can be activated when the shopping center opens. I have also enclosed a revised site plan for your records. If you need any additional information, please feel free to contact me directly. Sincerely, KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. ENGINEERS-PLANNERS-SURVEYORS ..~ , i//' d~ .1/V-/J-~-':.--:~ /y~ t'l,~..^;-:.-~:7 Frederick W. Schwartz, P.E. Director of Traffic Engineering FWS/DJM/en Enclosures cc: Charles Walker, Palm Beach County Jim Golden, City of Boynton Beach Departmel1.t of Transportation 11011 GRAHA AI GOVERNOJ< Thomas E. Drawdy .E:C~CTA'n 780 Southwest 24 Street Fort Lauderdale. Florida 33315-2696 Telephone: (305) 524-8621 March 18, 1986 Mr. Frederick W. Schwartz, P.E. Director Traffic Operations Keith and Schnars, P.A. 1115 N.E, 4th Avenue Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33304-1996 Dear Mr. Schwartz: Re: Section 93010; State Road 5 (U.S. 1) at Old Dixie Hwy.. Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County - Signal ~arrant Analysis This is in response to your letter of February 7, 1986. We have reviewed the information provided in your report and letter and concur with your proposal. We will provide the necessary authorization upon receipt of plans meeting with our approval. As to your question concerning a date of signal activation, we will permit the traffic signal to be turned on at the time of the shopping center's occupation. If you have any questions or comments, please contact this office. ~XE' Assistant District Traffic Operations Engineer WAL:hf cc: Mr. Charles R. Walker, Jr. --...- - -- -- ---- - -- -~--- ---- - ~~-~--~---- -~ ~ ------- -~--- -- THE GROVE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. Engineers-Planners-Surveyors 6500 North Andrews Avenue Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33309-2132 June, 1986 Our Project Number 11824.01 I. INTRODUCTION Keith and Schnars, P.A., has been retained to prepare a traffic impact report for The Grove, a shopping center loca- ted in the City of Boynton Beach in Palm Beach County. The Grove will be located on the northwest quadrant of U. S. 1 (Federal Highway) and Old Dix ie Highway. At the request of the City of Boynton Beach, a study area was estab- lished to determine the traffic impact of the proposed devel- opment on the local street network. This study area is bounded by Woolbright Road (Southwest 15th Avenue) to the north, Lake Ida Road (Northeast 4th Street) to the south, Ocean Boulevard (S.R. A-I-A) to the east, and Congress Avenue to the west. Figure 1 graphically illustrates the study area and the relative location of the site within it. - 1 - WOClL..-n III 15TH AVE $( 23111 AYE ~ I ~ ~ ! ! e i I . z ME 14 IT ~ ME ITIl ST MEmlT ~ . , ~ c E , LOCA TION MAP Iei(L uJ ScllllUl, P .AI ~ (]~~ ,..., ~ -II.AMD-MYJI_ ~ NORTH FIGURE II. TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION Trip making characteristics vary wi th the type of land use being considered. Trip generation rates were obtained from the report entitled "Trip Generation" which is published , by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Thi.s report is based on numerous studies conducted throughout the United States and is generally accepted as the authoritati.~e source for trip generation standards. The shopping center will house a 153,059 square foot retail area and a 877 seat movie cinema. Table I indicates the land use and its generation rate. Table II indicates the land use, its size and the generated trips per day. Table III indicates the PM peak hour trips. Generally, AM peak hour trips are also generated. However, as thi s type of development dictates that the PM peak hour will have the most adverse impact on the roadway network, this was the only peak period addressed. TABLE I TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use Rate - Daily Rate - PM Peak Retail - ITE 822 66.7/1,000 sq.ft. 2.85 in, 3.05 out/ 1,000 sq. ft. .006 in, .003 out/ seat Cinema * 0.75/seat * ITE rates not available. stud i e s. Estimates based on similar - 3 - TABLE II DAILY TRIP GENERATION Land Use Size Trips/Day 10,205 Re ta i 1 153,059 sq.ft. Cinema 877 seats 658 TABLE III PH PEAK HOUR GENERATION Land Use Inbound Outbounct Total --- -,- - --.--- -.---.--- Re ta i 1 436 467 903 Cinema 5 3 8 The projected distribution of traffic to and from the site was based on the population distribution of the surroun- ding area and field observation of the existing distribution of trips for adjacent developments in the surrounding area. Distributions throughout the study area are shown in Figure 2 along with the respective daily trips generated by the shopping center. The ingress and egress routes, and distributions rela- tive to the site, are shown in Figures 3 and 4, while Figures 5 and 6 illustrate the peak hour project related traffic based on this distribution. - 4 - IIOOlIlllllKT lID IE 2WI AYE @ ! I 0 & ! r c i I I . :IE ~ @ , 1/1 I ~ NORTH ~ XX% - DISTRIBUTION XX - DAIL Y PROJECT TRIPS DISTRIBUTIONS AND DAIL Y PROJECT TRAFFIC Keii1 lid &:1.In, P .A. ... ~ fUlOD ~ IJIVI,.. ~ IJ~~ ~ --_._----_.._,---_._.__..,._.,---_.__._--_._-_._.__...~-_.~-_._----_...,-- FIGURE 2 SE 23RD AVE 40% ~ SE 36TH AVE 101. INGRESS DISTRIBUTION % 5% 50% 15% 1 SITE 50% I 5% . >- ~ 1 w 5% x o o ....J o I 1 35% 5% 5% --' 5% 1 51. --. 35% Kei(1 ud Selman, P .A. ~........ ".,IYI.. . >- ;= :I: ....J <t 0:: W o w u.. ~ ~ ~ ~ NORTH FIGURE 3 SE 23RD AVE I 1 40% 15% ~ NORTH 5%~ SITE ~ 35% ~ . :>- 40% ~ :J: w 5% x 1 0 0 5% 35% ...J 5% 0 J 1 SE 36TH AVE J +-- 5% . :>- ~ :J: ...J -ex: 0:: w 0 w ~ ~ FIGURE EGRESS Keif1 ud Selman, P .A. m~ 4 DISTRIBUTION % IIIIND -IU.RD - bftRla ~ .' ~--------_._--- ~-~- -- -------------~ 66 SE 23RD AVE 1 176 ~ 22 221 ~ J 1 221 1 NORTH J 22 SITE 1 1 1 155 22 . 22 >- :t: :E: ~ x 2i 0 -oJ 0 SE 36TH AVE 44~ 22 -.J 22 1 22~ 155 . >- ~ :E: -oJ <C( a:: w 0 W \. \ \ LL PM PEAK -- PROJECT TRAFFIC INBOUND Ieia III Scban, P A ., ~"I_ 1.._,..- . ,..., FIGURE 5 (IC - . SE 23RD AVE .- -- I I 188 71 ~ - - NORTH 24~ . SITE ~ 165~ . :>- ~ 188 , :J: 1 w 24 x 1 0 0 ...J 24 165 24 0 J 1 SE 36TH AVE J +--24 , . :>- ~ :J: ...J <t 0:: W 0 W ~ PM PEAK Keiihald SehDan, P.A. ~ FIGURE PROJECT TRAFFIC m~ 6 OUTBOUND DBNIIIS - fIUNMDI- ~ ~ III. OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Utilizing the results of the trip generation and distri- bution calculations, it was then possible to assign the site related traffic to the existing roadway network. At the request of the City of Boynton Beach, four (4) critical intersections and six (6) roadway segments were then analyzed to yield the effect of the site related traffic on the selected intersections and roadway segments. The roadway segments include: 1. U.S. 1 (Federal Highway) from Old Dixie Highway to Southeast 23rd Avenue 2. U.S. 1 (Federal Highway) from Old Dixie Highway to Southeast 36th Avenue (Gulfstream Road) 3. Southeast 23rd Avenue from U.S. 1 (Federal Highway) to Seacrest Boulevard 4. Southeast 23rd Avenue from Seacrest Blvd. to 1-95 5. Southeast 23rd Avenue from 1-95 to Congress Avenue 6. Old Dixie Highway from U.S. 1 (Federal Highway) to Southeast 36th Ave. The critical intersections include: 1. U.S. 1 (Federal Highway) at Southeast 23rd Avenue 2 . U.S. 1 (Federal Highway) at Old Dixie Highway 3. U.S. 1 (Federal Highway) at Southeast 36th Avenue 4 . Old Dixie Highway at Southeast 36th Avenue - 10 - The analysis of impact on the roadway network was examined at two levels: 1. The existing traffic and its level of service. 2. The existing traffic plus the shopping center's pro- jected traffic and its level of service. The Level of Service (LOS) determinat ion was made in accordance wi th gu ide 1 ines spec i f ied by the Florida Depart- ment of Transportation. The respective volumes are compared to roadway capacities to determine the proper level of ser- vice. The capacities used are shown in Table IV. TABLE IV UTPS DAILY CAPACITIES OUTLYING BUSINESS DISTRICT LEVEL OF SERVICE "c" LEVEL OF SERVICE "D" 2 lanes 11,800 14,200 4 lanes, divided 27,000 32,400 Existing traffic volumes were collected from Florida Department of Transportation and from actual counts collected by Keith and Schnars personnel. Table V indicates the road- way segments with the existing average daily traffic (ADT) volumes and capacities, and the segment's operating levels of services (LOS). - 11 - TABLE V THE GROVE EXISTING AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC Roadway Segment # of Lanes Volume Capacity LOS u.S. 1 (Federal Highway): Old Dixie to SE 23 Ave. Old Dixie to SE 36 Ave. 4LD 4LD 18,510 17,040 Southeast 23rd Avenue: U.S. 1 to Seacrest Seacreast to 1-95 1-95 to Congress 2L 2L 2L 6,179 8,340 6,237 Old Dixie Highway: U.S. 1 to SE 36 Ave. 2L 919 27,000 27,000 A A 11,800 11,800 11,800 A A A 11,800 A Table VI then provides for the existing ADT coupled with the site generated traffic providing the expected volumes and ultimate levels of service when the shopping center is in full operation. - 12 - TABLE VI THE GROVE AVtRAGE DAILY TRAFfIC WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC Roadway Se~ent # of Lanes Volume Capacity LOS U.S. 1 (Federal Highway): Old Dixie to SE 23 Ave. 4LD Old Dixie to SE 36 Ave. 4LD 24,485 21,385 '.2.7,;)0:,\ C B 27,000 Southeast 23rd Avenue: U.S. 1 to Seacrest Seacreast to 1-95 1-95 to Congress 2L 2L 2L 10,524 10,513 8,410 11,800 11,800 11,800 c C A Old Dixie Highway: U.S. 1 to SE 36 Ave. 2L 1,462 11,800 A As stipulated by the FDOT, facilities operating in Level of Service "C" or better are deemed acceptable. Any project that causes roadway levels of service to fall below Level of Service "C" may be responsible for roadway improvements, so that Level of Service "C" can be maintained. - 13 - 1 As illustrated in Table VI, all of the critical roadway links examined will operate at Level of Service "e" or better. Pl'i Peak Hour Turning 1'1ovements were conducted at the f 0 U ( 4) c r i tic a I i n t e r s e c t ion s to de term i net h e i n t e r s ~ c - tions' capacities at today's operating conditions. Peak Hour project related traffic was then appl ied to the existinG turning movements to det.ennine the intersections' capacil:/ when the shopping center lS in full operation. The results of the intersection analysis can be found in Appendices A-D. As shown in Table VII, the proposed shopping center will have no adverse effect on the operating levels of the inter- sections. TABLE VII Intersection LOS Existing LOS With Project Federal Hwy & SE 23 Ave A B Federal Hwy & Old Dixie Hwy A B Federal Hwy & SE 36 Ave A B Old Dixie Hwy & SE 36 l'l.ve A A - 14 - IV. RECOMMENDATIONS A traffic signal justification study was perforrled by Keith and Schnars, under separate cover, for the inte~section of Old Dixie Highway and U.S. 1 (Federal Highway). The results indicate that when The Grove opens, a signal will be warranted, and should be instal1ed. In conjunction with the signal installation and to opti- mize the operation of the signal, the eastbound lanes at the intersection should include an exclusive left turn la~e and a southbound right turn lane would be desirable. See concep- tual design in Figure 7. In addition, an eastbound left turn lane should be provided at the main entrance to the shopping center. V. CONCLUSIONS As a result of the analysis described herein, it can be concluded that the traffic resulting from the development of The Grove can be adequately accommodated on the surrounding street network. - 15 - J',yo..o ~4-G' C'4~-9 ~C'c ~J'J' ~ NORTH \. r r r EI1 FEDERAL HWY. .... - CONCEPTUAL ROADWAY DESIGN IeifL ul Scbut, P.A. . ~ I_Jl,A.-.,-.,u. ,..., FIGURE 7 APPEfWIX A U.S. 1 (FEDERAL HIGH~AY) AT SOUTHEAST 36TH AVENUE KEITH C R I T I CA L At-J D S C Ht-JA R S, P _ A . t-1 OV Et'1 Et'.JT At-."JA L 'y' S I S ...........FEDERHL &. SE 36 <GULFSTREAt1) - E~.ISl1tJC,.*........ 1 L' 1 ~ 85 **......**.**..........*...*....... LA!~E 1 2 3 4 5 6 LE\,.JEL OF SER\Jl CE A SAT UF:ATl OtJ ~. 3 CR ITl CAL N/S ,)OL 746 CR n 1 CAL E/W VOL 1 2 1 eRJT 1 CAL SU~1' 867 ***********.*.*.....**.....******..*.* NORI HB OUND MO') WI Dl h Rl. I. . L. . 12.0 12.0 12.0 LAt~E GEOMETR,' S (i UI H 8 0 lit W E AS 180 Ui ~ ['J MU) Lon [;1 H MO'v' L..!I ('"7 H RI. 12.0 1\1 . J2.0 I. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 WEST80LY~[1 M D) l.n (, T H Fn. L. . 12.0 12.D IRAFF Ie VOLUt1ES NORTHBOlJ>lD SOUTH80Ut~D EAST80U!~D WESTBOUND LEFT 237 6 63 9 THRU 960 792 <; 3 RIGHT 12 30 102 9 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (tt/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOLt~D 10 0 1 SOUTHBOlJ'4D 10 0 1 EASTBOUND 10 0 1 WESTBOllJD 10 0 1 PHt;S ING N/S E/W PEDESTRIAN ACT IVITY CiCLE LENGTH THRU -RIGHT LEFT lNPU'T VOLUt1E ADJUSTED VOL ~PAC ITi NO:J HI ErH :4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WI1H OVERLAP) : 2. HEAV I EST TUR'~ PROTECTED 1 . (I - 99 OIPED~./HR) 90 SECONDS NORTHBOLIND 560 273 tWRTHBOLJ~D 237 273 o N/A CRIT 1 CAL LANE ',)OLL/f'1ES BY MO'JEt1ENT SOUTHBOUND 473 6 EASTBour~D 1 21 72 LEFT 'TURN CHECI< SOUTHBOUI~~ 6 6 o N/A EASTBOurD 63 72 118 NlA WESTBDUND 12 9 WESTBDUt~D 9 9 o NO KEITH AND SCHNARS. P.A. Engine e rs-Pla nner s-Sur v ey ors .::E I TH t'-~f.,JL' ~=;CHt.J.::""F':::::. ~ F' _1'''_ C PIT I CA L t-,-, Ct'.._-.' Et-.-' Et.',JT HIJ.....:.. L " ~=. 1 - FE C. E F:t--=::. L ,~'" :::'; E ,::;:: .:', " c:' U L F ::=;-, F- E'-::':"f 1 ::0 TI,II JE 1 ,~, ,;:! '. 1.-' ... .::.. F- CI,_1 L C.T .~~~~.~+~+~..~.~*~~~~~.+.~..++.+.. L fi'EL elF- ':C,EF".' ICE E; ~'ri T U F'':'' T I OIJ 5 .:::=. e F ) T I CHL I'..~. '.'Oe.. :::::.: CI .:;.- ( FIT Ie f-t L E 1,1 '.' 0 L 1 :::::- 1 C F-'! T 1 Cf-'-L t,Ut1 ';:;,' .:=: () .~~.~~*~~~.~~~~~~.~+..~~~~~~+~~*.+..* L.:.:.,t~E r~c,r::'1 HEe:-=,\.lt ;[, 11':'"' 1.1 I ['TH L,:.,t : 1:[0'1ET~, ':.CiUThECC,.." 'L' t.1':".' II) [TH E"t--,':'j f:OUl ~~ I.I[':TE':'!U' ,r , VI" Ii 1 ['I'" ri (y t I" 1 [ ~ 1-1 ,::, ~T . 1 ;::: . [I i . . 1 ::: _ (, L.. 12.(..1 F:T , ! ;::' . Ci F'T _ 1:':.:< L. _ 1 :: _ ':. FT. 1 :.' .:' L. . 1:' ,':' .'J T I . 1:':' I Cl L. . 1:.0 4 '" ~, '~I NOFTHE:CiUI1D TFAFF Ie ')C)LUt1E':. SOUTHE:CiUU[, EA~.TE::OUrJ[' I...IE ~,TE:OUIJ[' LEFT THF.:U R I C,HT .",:,::,.., L,-_' , .. -.' ,-,e C, _I 11 1 :. 12 ,-, r:-:- ":'" _I, .j 54 10': ~' NORT HE:OUr J[:. SOUT HE:OUrJD EA"::,TE:OUt Jr, h.IE :::.T BOlltJD TRuel<'::, co 1 (I 1 (i 1 (I 1 (I LOCAL BUSES . N .HP) (I (i (I o PEAK HOUR FACTOF 1 1 1 1 PHA:::. I IJG N/:;:. E/(..) F'E['E~:TF:IHtJ ACTI\)Ir, C 'I C L E L Et ~ I~ T H : 4. E:OTH TUF't'E: PF OTECTE[, . 1..1 I TH O'.'EF'LAF') : 2. HEFt.'I E::::T TUF.lJ PF'lYiECTEC, 1 . (I - ';'0;- '. *IF'ED':.. HF') ,;' (I :::. E C or j [, ~, CF:ITIC;:,L LAflE I.'OLUt'lE:::. E:, l'lor'EtlEtlT 227 Ci C. _! ~ lJE':,TE:':",_" .: 1 :.: (I THFU -F: I GHT LEFT ,~\50 ~5:=:2 E,.:;,STBouri[, J C'1 ~ . rWPTHE:C!Utm '::,0 UT H E: 0 Ut.J Co LEFT TUFJJ C HEO' NOPTHE:!:luriC ~,OUTHE:CIUI..J[. E ;-,'~T E' ,:'IU: ~~, J,I E ':::1 E: ,:i1Jf J = IIJF'UT VOLUI.1E A[,,JU:;:,T E [, I.!OL CAPf-tCITy t.l01)H1EIJT --:":.7 L. "_' , I-'~ .=. -' .;....:.,. (; Ci Ii....., t,;-. _ll C (I (I It f-t 1 [!~' 1/ ,:., Of KEITH AND SCHNARS. P.A. E ng I neer a-Planner a-S urvey ors APPEtWIX B u.s. 1 (FEDERAL HIGHWAY) AT OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY ... E I T H At.J D :=; C HI .,J':4 F~" P. A . C F: 1 I I CA Lt.., D'.." Et.., E ,.rr At.J,,:=::' L -", ~. I .:::' .....+..+++++....r::'E~~t-i..._ H:..t"j l~'. OL[' ['};,JE HL'.'1 _. E']::.IIt~C..,~+""""'''.+''+ J r,. E~ r~', .+++~.+++..+~......~.+.+....+~+... LE' 'E~ O~ SEPt'j CE A S....,: UF.:.- T ] en; [ F ] 1 ] C h '- r~ ~, [ F: ] ! J lH L E il.'! e F: ! I J C':':' ~ t, U" ,-. r-. ~.::::. .=, i,} [, L ~. E: c.. 1,1[\_ 1 (I 4 690 *.+..~~+~+~~~++*~~+.++++~++~++~~*.+++ L~I~~ f:EOt'lETR\ r~:=1 F: ~E [I ~!l.J[! ::' =1 U"T HE: Ci Ur~[; EH~TE,DUt~[' 11 tJ.I 1\1 J L ~... I,' E: T 8 [I UIJ L\ ~;;=!' t..11[liH L,:.;'E r1C" , : L,TH tit}. t.! 1 [:1 H F:' , 1::' I 0 ~,. ~ ::: . (I L.O 12, (I >nL J 2, C: F.... .... 12. (I L. . ::::. (i 1 L', [I ,. ,. , . . ~. :! , ~ r . 5 Co t~Ci FT HE: D L.i!~[, T F:riF ~ I ( 'v'OL Ur-1E~, ~;O UT H8 DUNC E.:- ~,T 8 G Ur~[! IIJE::,T80iJ:~[ .oJ .,j o (I 6 LEFT TI-IFU RIGHT 36 1002 15 6 64E: e ';' "'''7 ~'. 24 !~onH80ur,J[' SOUTH80LII.j[, EA::,180Ut~[j WEET8DUr Jr' TPUC ~:E (>: 10 1 (I 10 10 LOC~L K! :,E~. (It. 'HF ) (I (: (I (I PE~~ HOUR FACTOR P HA::, 1 t~ [, N./ E; E/l~ PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY C!TLE LEt~GIH : 1. N E 1T HER T U Rt.j ~, F' OT E CT E D : 1. ~~E lTHEF' TURt~ PROTECTEC, 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS,HR' 9Ci SECOt~[''::, eRn 1 CA~ LAt~E '-)Ot-UtlE':: E:( t'lcr)(f'IP:"" 1. c- (;, ..I;... 3~' EA'::.T8(tur~[: 104 (I ('J~ E,: E:DUt.j[! 6 (I tWPT HE:DUt.JE' S Ci iJT HEO UNCI 1 HR~I - F' I 1;'1-'-:- _E~T '58t. 40~5 LEFT TUF:t.~ CHEU< t .J = ~ - ~ E: CI Lit J [I ~,OUT HE: CIU~ ~ [., E~':,T BC: ~y..~[, 1..'.,1 ~ 1::,T E: D Ur.J~} CAF'AC 11, ~'iCi')H1Et,;: . i " .l. C'1. I) .: ::' o c (; It~PUT ',.'DLUtlE ."":,...., c ~,~ H:' ,) U :.1" E [I I~.t [I i.... i c:, ~ ,:-,-, ~, 7 ..,10 ,.',-1 [/, NO Of o~:. KEITH AND BCHNARB, P.A. Engineers-Pia nner s- Surveyors KEITH AND SCHNARS~ P.A. C R I T I CA Lt.., 0',." Et'.1 Et...JT At-..JA L .~.-.. ::=; I .=. 1..0..1 I TH PPO._TECT FEDERAL & OLD DIXIE ,J UI'JE 1 :;':=:.~. ********************************** LE"-!EL C)F SER(..' ICE E: SATUPAT I (ltJ 60 Cfd TICAL N/S VeIL 5 .:;:.-:;:. C1': I TICAL E...ld 1,.'C)L 4 ::::: :2 CR I TICAL SUt'.l 1 0 :3 1 ************************************* LAt'IE NORTHBOUND '.'10'...1 VJ I DTH .? ... RT. T. . L. . 12. (I 12.0 12.0 ~. ,:, 4 5 L u t-~ORTH80UND LEFT THRU RIGHT 1$'1 1024 15 NORTH80Ut'..JD SOUTHBOUND EA~:TBOUt'ID kIESTE:OUND TRUCKS (~.,;) 1 (I 1 (I 1 (I 1 (I PHASING N/S E/'I.,..I PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTH LANE GEmlETF"'( t:OUTHE:OUt.JD EA:::,TE:OUIJ[, t.'10') I/..II [lTH t.l0') I,.II ['TH l.lE t,T E: CIUflD tnlCl..' t,1 I ['Th fn. T. . L. . 1.?O 1 2. (I 12. (I 1 :2. (I 12.0 F.:TL F;TL TRAFF Ie I)OLUt.1E:=: SOUTHBOUI~D EASTBOUtlD I...JESTBOUND L ....' :=:2E: o o .:."?--:. "-' ( ~ :.:: 278 1 ;::: s;, 6 LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) [I o o o PEAK HOUR FACTOR 1 1 1 1 :1. NEITHER : 1. t'lEITHER 1 . 90 SEC:ONDS TURt..J PF.:OTECTED TURt.! PROTECTED [I - 99 (HPEDS/HR) CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT THRU -F.: I GHT LEFT t..JC)RTHBOUND 599 488 I f',JPUT ')OLur.1E AD,JUSTED ")OL CAPACITY MOVEtnlEt'..JT NOF.:THBOUND 191 488 5'7' t~O I.<JESTBCJUND t:OUTHBOUND 540 o EA::=,TBOUt.JD 4 ::':2 o o "- '-' LEFT TURt.'.l CHECI< ::=: I] UT H B [I UI..~ D t.- o o C) 1< EA S T 8 D Ut.~ D klE ::=:T8 0 Ut..j [) o (} (: 32::=: .-:./,,:. ~, ...-. 476 Oh o~:: ._-~~~.- --_.._----_.~_.-- -~----- -------.--..-.-----.....-- KEITH AND SCHNARS. P.A. Engineers-Planners-Surveyors APPENDIX C U.S. 1 (FEDERAL HIGHHAY) AT SOUTHEAST 23RD AVENUE KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS **..*****....FEDERAL HWl & SE 23 AVE - EXISTING.......*..... 198~1 ****************************.*.... LE'-,iEL OF SERVl CE A S~TURATIDN 42 CPITI CAL N/S 'JOL 559 CRITICAL E/W 'JOL 196 Cf;'IT! CAL SLlt'l 755 *....*....*******.**....****.***.**.. LAr~E r~ORTH80UND ~1CO WI [iTH .., i:. RT. T. . L. . 12.D 12.0 12.0 3 4 c: ..J 6 NORTHBOUND LEFT iHF'U RIGHi 71 966 3 NORiHBOUtW SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUN[) TRUCKS (~n 10 10 1 (I 10 PHASING N/S E/W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTH LANE GEm1ETRY ~.OUTH80UN[) EASTBOUN[J ~1D\) l,IJ DT H ~10\,' WI DT H F:T. Li. 12. (I 12.0 RTL 12.0 T RAFF I C ',JOLU~1ES SOUTHBOUt~D EASTBOUND 12 708 171 120 3 96 LOCAL BUSES (~/HR) o (I o o :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) 90 SECONDS CR IT I CAL LANE VOLU~1ES BY MO'v'H1ENT THRU -RIGHT LEFT NORTHBOlltK' 559 o nlF' liT I,) 0 L Ut1 E ADJU;:;TED IJOL CAPACIT'r HO'JEMENT NORTHBOUND 71 (I 57 Of< SOUTHBOUND 502 (I LEFT TURN CHEU SOUTHBOUND 12 o o OK EASTBOUND 1ge. o EASTBOUND 120 88 190 01< WE~.TBDLIND MO',J WI [l'j H RTL 12.0 WEST80UN[J o 3 3 PEAI< HOUR FACTOR 1 1 1 1 WESTBOUND 6 o 4IESTBOUt~D o o (I OK KEITH AND SCHNARR, P.A. EngIne ers-PI anners-Surve yors ....::: E I T H At--J L:' S C Ht---JA F::=;, F' _ t--'t - CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSI_ FEDERAL & BE ~~ AVE .JUt.JE 1 ~'8i, t.--, I TH F'RO....JECT *****~*~**************~****~***~+~ LE'v'EL OF SEF."..) ICE E: ~,ATUF.:AT I (It.J ..:;:. .~. C R I TICAL t.J./S l.)OL "7 .:;:. ::2 CF; I T I CHL E./I...1 l)CIL :=: 4 .;:::. CF;ITICAL :3Ur.1 1 1 :=:B *************************~********~** LAI'4E NDRTHE:CrUN[.. MOl) ~'JIDTH ~. L. PT. T. . L. . 12.0 12. (I 12.0 3 4 5 6 t,JORTHBOUtJD LEFT THRU RIGHT 259 1037 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EA::::TBOUND WESTBOUND TPUCKS (%) 1 (I 10 10 10 PHASING N/S E/I,J PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTH 3 LAt,JE GEOt."ETR' ~;OUT HE:Dur..j[) EA~,T E:DUt..J[' t.lI)l) I.AJ I [..TH t.lO'.) 1.'.1 I [,TH PT. LT. 12.0 1':;' n fHL 12.0 TF.:AFF I C '.)OLUt'1E:;:; SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 12 774 1 71 120 :3 272 LOCAL BUSES (#/HP) o o (I o : 2. HEAl) I E:=;T : 1. NEITHER 1 . 90 SECONDS TURt.J PROTECTED TURt.J pF.:(nECTE[i o - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CRITICAL LAtJE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT THRU -RIGHT LEFT NORTHBOUND 600 252 It'4PUT VOLUI'1E AD.JUSTED VCrL CAPACITY MO'v'E~.1ENT NOFTHBOUND 259 252 60 hl/A SOUTH8C)UtJD 540 (I EA:;:.T80Ut.lD 346 o LEFT TUF.'N CHECK SOUTHBDU~--JD EASTBOUtJD 120 44 .:::40 CW 12 (I 1 q.-::. OK (.JE ~;TE:CIUt Je. t101..' 1J..1 I DTH RTL 12.0 I;.IE~;T80ur...JD o ~, .'j ~. PEAK HOUR FACTOR 1 1 1 1 I.,JESTBour J[. .:::. o I,JESTBOUND o u (I C) r:': KEITH AND SCHNARS. P.A. E ngi neer s- P I a nner s-S ur v ey ars APPENDIX D OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY AT SOUTHEAST 36TH AVENUE (GULFSTREM.1 ROAD) KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS **uu*OLD DIXIE HWY &: SE 36 (GULFSTREAt1) - EXISTIN&*uuu 11/19/85 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURAT I ON 20 CRIT I CAL N/S VOL 7 1 CRITICAL E/W VOL 289 CRITI tAL SUM 360 ************************************* LANE NORTHBOUND MOV WI DTH LANE GEOt1ETRY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH WESTBOl.t~D MOIJ WIDTH 1 2 3 4 5 6 RT L 1 2 . 0 RT L 1 2 . 0 RTL 12.0 RTL 12.0 . . " . NORTHBO~D TRAFFIC VOLlt1ES SOUTHBO~~D EASTBOUND WESTBOLND LEFT THRU RIGHT 15 24 27 9 27 18 27 159 36 36 207 21 NORTHBO~D SOUTHBO~D EASTBOUND WESTBO~D TRUCKS (%) 10 10 10 10 LOCAL BUSES (~/HR) o o o o PEAK HOUR FACTOR 1 1 1 1 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TUffi~ PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEOESTRIAt~ ACTIVITY 1. o - 99 (MPEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBO~D SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 71 57 242 289 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOl.t~D WESTBOUND INPUT VOLl.t1E 15 9 27 36 ADJUSTED VOL 16 9 29 39 CAPACITY 14 0 0 47 HOJEMENT NO NO NO OK KEITH AND SCHNAJ:lS. P.A. Engine e rs-Planner s-Surv e y ors KEITH AND SCHNARS~ p_~_ CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS OLC> DI><I E &';. - -..:.:~:... SE :3 .-:E.. 0:: G U L F :=:;T~: EAt-,'l ) JUt,JE 19E:,::. ""'.1 ,.-/ F' R Cl.3 ******************************~*** LPIEL OF ::::E~:I,.I I CE ~ ::F.TUPAT I Ot.J :2 0 CPITICAL t~/:::: ','()L 75 CF: I TICAL E./I.<.I l)fJL :2 7 7 CRI TICAL '3Ut.l :::::: 5:2 ************+.*+.+.+.+.+.+.+.**+.*+.*+.~+.*+.+.*+.** LANE NCI F:T H80UND t'~10'..) VJ I DTH F.TL 12. [I ':> .... 3 4 5 o NORTHBOUND LEFT THRU RIGHT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EA~=;TBOUND WESTBOUND TRUCI<S C':) 10 10 10 10 PHASING N/S E/lJ PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTH 15 24 -j -: ...t LANE GEO~1ETPY SOUTH80lliJD EAST80lN0 l1Cil) 1...11 DTH t101...' 1.1l [II H 1....IE::::TBOUtJD 1.1(Ii.' I,..j I [IT H RTL 12.0 F.'TL 12.0 F'TL 12.0 TF:AFF Ie: '..)OLur.1E:=:; SOUTH8C)Ut.jD EA:=::T80UI,JD t.JESTBOUtJD '7' 4? 1 :31 ,-. .. .,::.0 231 21 27 42 .=.:6 LOCAL BUSES (#./HR) o o (I (I F'EA~: HOUR FACTOR 1 1 1 1 :1. NEITHER :1. t'-.JEITHER 1 . 90 SECDND:::: TUF.:N F'ROTECTE[I TURt.,J F'ROTECTEO [I - 99 (#F'EDS/HR) NDFnHBOUND CR IT 1 CAL LANE VOLUr1E~=: BY' r'10')Et'.lEtn IlJESTBOUt~D THRU -RIGHT LEFT .,- .,- __, --I (I If.JPUT I.)OLur'lE AD,JUSTED l,)OL CAPACIT\' M 0') Et'l Eln hlOF:THBOUt~D 15 (I (I Ok: ::::OUTHBOUt.jD 75 I] EA'=::TE:our JD 2::::8 Ci '~1"'7 ..:..... ( [) LEFT TUF:r.j CHEC~( :30UTHE:OUf~D E;::;:::,TE:CIUr ID -'-i ,;. o i) I..../E ST E:(WIJD 9 o 20 CW: .-:..... .......-, I] .-,,-, .=... "7 (.If-; O~': KEITH AND SCHNARS. P.A. Engineers-Planners-Surveyors --------_..._._~_._.~.~-._-~~--~_._-_._--~_._~_._--_._-- SHARED PARKING STUDY THE GROVE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. Engineers-Planners-Surveyors 6500 North Andrews Avenue Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33309-2132 June, 1986 Revised September 1986 Our Project Number 11824.01K INTRODUCTION This study addresses the parking needs of The Grove, a shopping center in the City of Boynton Beach, Florida. Since The Grove is made up of varying kinds of retail and a cinema, it was felt that advantages could be realized by applying the shared parking concept. Many studies have been conducted which conclude that combining land uses results in a demand for parking that is less than the demand generated by separate free-standing developments of similar size and character. This opportunity is realized by two conditions: l. Variations in peak accumulations associated with different activity patterns (by hour, day, season) . 2. Relationships among land use activities whereby people are attracted to more than one land use on a single trip. The authoritative source in quantifying the interactions - associated with shared parking phenonmenon is published by the Urban Land Institute (ULI). It is a compilation of data - 1 - collected nationwide which describes the variations in parking demands and the interaction of complimentary land uses. The ULI methodology was used in this report. Additionally, the formula required by Ordinance No. 86-8 of the City of Boynton Beach was calculated to ensure the proper buffer was maintained. The advantages of using the shared coricepts to reduce the amount of parking required are many. To the developer, not having to pave more parking lot than is necessary saves money. To the City, a more pleasing center with less paved and more landscaped areas results. And, to all, a more accurate design providing only what is needed results. .. - 2 - BACKGROUND The Grove is a retail center proposed for the northwest corner of Federal Highway and Old Dixie Highway in the City of Boynton Beach, Florida. Two maJor retail stores, or anchors, are planned --- a Winn Dixie and a Scotty's Lumber Store. Several general retail tenants will make up the addi- tional square footage, and a cinema with six screens will be provided. The details of the site are summarized as follows: Anchor Retail - vh n IJ Dixie 46,351 so. ft. - Scotty's Lumber Store 10,022 sq. ft. Anchor Total 56,373 so. ft. General Retail (including outparcels) 84,260 sa. ft. Cinema -1,470 seats 22,000 sq. ft. Total Site 16'2,.633 sq. ft. The City of Boynton Beach Code requirements, taken separately without consfdering shared parking interaction, would result in the need for 1,071 parking spaces. Retail reouirements are one parking space for each 200 souare feet .. of space, and for the cinema, one space is required for every four seats~ Therefore, the.requirements would be: - 3 - Anchor Retail - 56,373 sq. ft. General Retail - 84,260 sq. ft. Cinema - 1,470 seats Total required by Code: 282 spaces 421 spaces- 368 spaces 1,071 spaces Using the ULI methodology, however, allows a more reasonable calculation of required parking. - 4 - ULI Methodology The basis for the Urban Land Institute's research was to define the characteristics of parking demands for single land uses. Then, by analyzing parking accumulations at mixed use centers, the shared parking concept was quantified. The ULI recommends the following procedure be followed in determining shared parking: 1. Initial Project Review: Knowledge of the site and the intended land uses is very important in beginning the shared parking analysis. Results from the initial review for The Grove has been presented in earlier sections in terms of square footage and land uses proposed. 2. Adjustment for Peak Parking Factor: The park- ing factors are those specified in the City of Boynton Beach Code as detailed earlier in this report and indicate a need for 984 spaces. 3. Analysis of Hourly Accumulations: Parking accumulation curves are selected by reviewing the ULI data and incorporating site specific conditions. 4. Estimate of Shared Parking: The hourly parking demand for each land use is merged to estimate overall shared parking demand. This is simply the hour by hour addition of parking demand for each use to estimate aggregate demand. .. - 5 - -.. "--,---,--_.__..__._-,.._........_---~-- ._._.-...._-------~._------- THE ANALYSIS Apply ing the ULI methodology to The Grove yielded the hourly parking accumulation curves for each of the three land uses for weekday and Saturday conditions. Figure 1 - Anchor Retail Parking Accumulation Weekday Figure 2 - General Retail Parking Accumulation Weekday Figure 3 - Cinema Parking Accumulation - Weekday Figure 4 - Anchor Retail Parking Accumulation Saturday Figure 5 - General Retail Parking Accumulation Saturday Figure 6 - Cinema Parking Accumulation - Saturday The data for the ~nchor Retail is taken directly from ULI. The data collected under their study parallels exactly the kind of retail described herein as "Anchor Retail." General Retail in The Grove is expected to be made up of: small stores. A huge range of businesses could be tenants in these General Retai 1 stores travel agents, card shops, bookstores, office supplies, etc. These retail businesses do - 6 - ICO '10 z 0 - ... eo c -' ::) :E ,D :) (,) (,) C .~ . Cd::> !; ~ ~ 2:J C IlL ~ C ~O 111 IlL J I&. 0 ~O I .. Z i 111 / (,) c 20 111 Q. \0 C> ~ .~ ~ ~.. ~ ~ 8 ] ~ j ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ HOUR OF THE DAY ANCHOR RETAIL WEEK.DA Y KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ENGINEERS. PLANNERS. SURVEYORS 6500 NORTH ANDREWS A VENUE FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA (305) 776-1616 FIGURE 1 PROJECT: THE GROVE PN: 11824.01K SHEET_OF CALCULATED BY: D.... DATE: 8/88 CHECKED BY: FWS DATE: 8/88 ICO Z 0 - CD l- e ~ :) 2 ED ::>> (J (J e 70 CJ z - ~ c be e A. ~ e 50 ILl Q. U. .0 40 .. Z III (J &J ~ III 'A. '10 10 0 ~. Cl~l~eB8(le 08B80 8 8 .~ ~ 8 c ~ 8, ,. , .. 9. ~ -- " ,. ~ ~ - ~ . a ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .C"- tS:l c:r ,.,... - ~ ... ... . . HOURDFTHE DAY GENERAL.RET AIL . WEEKDAY FIGURE 2 KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ENGINEERS. PLANNERS. SURVEYORS 6500 NORTH ANDREWS A VENUE FT. LAUDERDALE. FLORIDA (305) 776-1616 PROJECT: THE GROVE PN: 11824.01K SHEET_OF CALCULATED BY: DJ". DATE: ./88 CHECKED BY: FWS DATE: 8/88 \ ex> 5 'io - ~ c -' 80 :>> :E :) U U 70 C ~ z 60 .- ~ a: c A. ~ '29 c W A. 1L 40 0 ~ z ~ w U GC W A. '2.0 10 0 ~ ~ .<J ... . \\.. .. 9 B 8~ 8 8 B 8 8 B ~ a ~ B e 8. B ~ 8 p . .. q .. t :..:. N -."'-\ N\ "q UI \S r--- ~ ~ () - t'J ~ I'- ~... a-. - - m .... ~ - - HOUR OF .THE DAY CINEMA WEEKDAY FIGURE 3 KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ENGINEERS, PLANNERS. SURVEYORS 6500 NORTH ANDREWS A VENUE FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA (305) 776-1616 PROJECT: THE GROVE PN: 11824.01K SHEET_OF CALCULATED BY: DJII DATE: a,a8 CHECKED BY: FWS DATE: a188 . Ice "0 z 2 ~ c 80 -' :) ::E :) ,'0 U U C ,~ bO z - ~ a: c 5"0 A- ~ C J&,I 40 A- IL 0 ..~ 30 Z J&,I u 15 2.0 A- ID 0 ~ 2~. - 88~88888~ij~a~~BS~e~ .'n -- .' -' D .:.:. N :...:..~ ('(l ~ Ul --.9 r- t() cr- (J = ~ ~ t:--c;:()<.r ....-. ., . -HOUR. OF THE DAY ANCHOR RET AI'L ..SATURDA Y FIGURE 4 KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ENGINEERS, PLANNERS. SURVEYORS 6500 NORTH ANDREWS A VENUE FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA (305) 776-1616 PROJECT: THE GROYE PN: "824.01K SHEET_OF CALCULA TED BY: Dol.. DATE: a/aa CHECKED BY: FWS DATE: &/88 ~ b 8 g 828. ~ 8 ~ $ e ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~!l " ,. ii . ~.:.:.. N :.:.~ \'fI ~ l!) ~ r- ((l cr- 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... - ~ . . 'HOUR' OF THE DAY GENERAL RETAIL ...SA TURDAY . . . FIGURE 5 KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ENGINEERS, PLANNERS. SURVEYORS 6500 NORTH ANDREWS A VENUE FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA (305) 776-1616 PROJECT: THE GROVE PN: 11824.01K SHEET_OF CALCULA TED BY: DJII DATE: 8/ee CHECKED BY: FWS DA TE: 8,ee ,co z CiO 52 ... c ... 80 :) :E :) U U 70 C CJ z too - :lIl: G: C A. :lIl: r==,O C IU CL do '11. 0 ... z 30 III U C 1&1 tD A- It) 0 .~ . 0 -2~8~88888()e88 8 8 ~ 8 Q 8 <8 ... .' . . '. . . .. ~ .. . . . ... . .' '. (J .. ~ -. \"l t'(l ~ Ul '-9 f" ~ cr- ~ \Slr.-\;\JC;:S-~=~ ~~ - ~ - - HOUR OF THE DAY CINEMA SATURDAY, FIGURE 8 KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ENGINEERS. PLANNERS. SURVEYORS 6500 NORTH ANDREWS A VENUE FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA (305) 776-1616 PROJECT: THE GROVE PN: 11824.01K SHEET_OF CALCULA TED BY: DJM DA TE: a/8a CHECKED BY: FWS DATE: a/88 not exhibit the same parking characteristics as the ULI data, or the Anchor Retai 1 found at The Grove. These businesses tend to close sooner in the day and, to a large extent, to capture customers from the neighboring anchor retail. There- fore, the parking accumulation curves reflect this close relationship of the General Retail with other parts of the site. The cinema exhibits parking activities quite different than either of the retail uses. Guided by the ULI data, con- servative estimates of parking accumulation were used. It was assumed that weekday matinees would be offered and patroni zed. Furthermore, it was assumed that each weekday evening would be a sellout at each of the six screens. Although this would be economically desirable to the operator of the cinema, it will not happen very often. These assumptions have been used to present the worst case and to provide enough parking during these times. Seasonal variations are addressed in the ULI report, and the City of Boynton Beach Ordinance. In each case, the vari-~ ations would tend to decrease the parking demands during the off-season. - 13 - - Because the ULI data has been collected nationwide, seasonal variations do not describe experiences in South Florida. It is assumed in this report that the peak season for the anchor retail, general retail and cinema all occur at the same time, and that no shared parking benefit can be derived from the relation of different peak seasons. Once again, this assumption serves to present the worst case, and supply the most parking. Percentages for the parking accumulation curves have been applied to peak hour demand for parking in each land use to arrive at calculation of shared parking values. Table 1 shows the total parking demand for weekdays, and Table 2 for Saturdays. - 14 - TABLE 1 WEEKDAY PARKING ACCUMULATION Time Anchor Retail Cinema Total 6:00 a. m. 0 0 0 0 7:00 23 34 0 57 8:00 51 76 0 127 9:00 118 84 0 202 10:00 192 126 0 318 11:00 245 168 0 413 12:00 noon 274 253 55 582 1:00 p.m. 282 253 92 627 2:00 274 253 129 656 3:00 268 244 147 659 4:00 245 223 221 689 5:00 223 211 258 692 ** 6:00 231 126 294 651 7:00 251 84 331 666 8:00 245 42 368 655 9:00 172 34 368 574 10:00 90 25 368 483 11:00. 37 0 294 331 12:00 mid. 0 0 258 258 ** Weekday peak hour - 15 - TABLE 2 SATURDAY PARKING ACCUMULATION Time Anchor Retail Cinema Total 6:00 a.m. 0 0 0 0 7:00 8 13 0 21 8:00 28 42 0 70 9:00 85 126 0 211 10:00 127 189 0 316 11:00 206 202 0 408 12:00 noon 240 232 110 582 1:00 p.m. 268 253 184 705 2:00 @ ~ 258 772 ** 3:00 282 223 258 763 4:00 254 211 258 720 5:00 212 168 258 638 6:00 183 84 294 561 7:00 169 55 331 555 8:00 155 29 368 552 9:00 113 8 368 489 .. 10:00 107 0 368 475 1l:00- 37 0 294 331 12:00 mid. 0 0 258 258 ** Saturday peak hour - 16 - CONCLUSIONS Weekday shared parking demands peak at 5:00 in the afternoon. Both the retail uses are active, and the cinema matinees are near their peak. The peak demand from the ULI methodology is 689 spaces. Saturdays exhibit similar characteristIcs, but the cinema is more active, resulting in a peak hour demand at 2:00 p.m. of 772 spaces. Since a grea ter aggrega te peak hour dema nd occurs on Saturday, it will be used for design purposes. It may be prudent to allow for a safety factor of ten percent (10%) above the ULI calculations to provide for natural turnover of parking and unexpected fluctuating peaks. If this was provided at The Grove, 849 spaces would be supplied. Since the current site plan allows for 931 spaces, there is a very comfortable cushion of twenty percent (20%) provided. .. - 17 - _. ORDINANCE NO. 86-8 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH Using the formula specified in Ordinance 86-8, a buffer of at least ten percent (10%) needs to be provided "to ensure a sufficient number of parking spaces are available at times of peak hour use." Buffer = surplus shared parking on-site + shared parking provided For The Grove: Buffer = 49 x 100% = 13% 228 + 140 This is further supported below: Ro = retail needs by Ordinance Ru = retail needs by ULI Ra = retail available = Ro - Ru Co = cinema needs by Ordinance Total = provided on-site At The Grove: Total = 931 parking spaces Ro = 703 Ru = 514 {/>..JtJ Co = 368 .. - 18 - The following calculations apply: Ra = Ro - Ru = 703 - 514 = 189 On-site = Total - Ro = 931 - 703 = 228 Shared Parking Provided = C '- On-site = SPP o = 368 - 228 = 140 Surplus Shared Parking = Ra - SPP = Sur = 189 - 140 = 49 S, Buffer = 49 x 100% = 13% 228 + 140 Therefore, sufficient buffer exists to satisfy the City of Boynton Beach shared parking ordinance. .. - 19 - 3^mm 3H~ I ~ i J I i ~ ~ U! r :i_ .:J :; .......- ~:; ~ .~i 'r\-;'. -t'" ""~~; {; N\,'d l:l3M3S ON\' l:l3~ \' M ~, i2 ~ Ot- ;g z J >0: ~~ i ~ ~~ ~ ~u ::~ u: 0:., 0.. .." "''' ~!! , i ---f. , ;:(~ I '. 1/,-...- , " iL-:::_ . ; ,~I ~ . . .:.: 'J . . r , ; t f 91 !c ~ CI~ ~...~il!;o ~C)(cz> ~~~~S~ ~8~~~~ Ol-~S!O" ..,.. %~2 fo~-,!~f 1&Ia::I&lCi~D ~!l::lo~r .. ....;:g:z:5 ~ e::~~~: r !f-~zwwlDll! - "'--co c ,. UK!j2it-'. I!!I ~~o:e~~; Zwl&lcOW~ g 8~~i:;t~1 -- -- .----.. ---~ ~Oj."HJ.otJ . \-l9V36 .1 YCI~O" '8 3\-\ 3^Ol:\ . , - -' 'O,.N...,,~~~~.~~H 'S"n --....,--2_.~ - - - . .--- c:=::= . h\~; . - :h~. .- "-1. \\ l...."i' ./ :t;.';\ -1!", . ,-.U~. ,i:'i: ~ l~\\~~ l~h~ . l'~lo.. :,,_:! l!hl~ ~;n~ 1 !-l\. '0"-0 . ~i'l\~ lW0. ' \!\.~. l'~:"- i;i\'i ,\~~~o ~-!;h i,",.,.. 1- -~:! ;~i~. t ~h,;~, ;;;~,~: - '!i.ai!\ 1.h'b_ a:. ...\ 1, .. 'i~~;c 0._ ocl '~i", (j) . !-\ili.1 ~ ~;r.t''1 U1 ~. ;'1 It _.. o I 4i'it\" ;~~~' -, ~.:! '. ~,:."~ -- '-!~t-. <~~. ..: :1 "112'. ".0. \" Li'hhl1 f. " . U1 h-- \~ \ .. ~" u, ';a, ~10 ' ~ ':~ ..."./; '''''~lf'''';.. .,..~~ :..;,~,~_,z~.:;:.:~~. .~:(-:.:f,,~~~~r';i~~~~t:~. ."~;.:;:::;~ttr:-~r.'"~'fN;!.:;i.~..... ... _I .. _ .. -~---------'''''''''---'--'''''' "'--~ ._-~--"_..-_.~"-_.._......_.,._- -.-- "'--""-.-" --_._.... .- -.....-.. ..... ..-..-.... -. _.... ...' ,- .. ,...., - .~..__..... ..- --.....-.. -.-. _..... --- ..."'........."'.,-.- ...-.-- ...... .._---.~..._.... '-.-_.....,.-.......-...-.~ ....-......-. ....,-..--.--..--.......... -~........._.-...-..,-...._... .....-. .. .. _ _~ ,_ _'..0- ......... _"'~ __.._ .-...........,--.....-... ....... .~_.~......._" . ._........~....-.....,..-_...._..'"-...., VOI"O'" . k:)..,. "'OJ"A"'. 3^OI:l~ 3Hl t-.r- _l_'_-";~ _ ,_) I. ;Ir-J! ~ . I ~ r: : '-r--- :. [' -(..) 11,) i - . i ~ . - _:) . 1 "- .~__1! - J i I , j ;. . 'r Il~_, . 0---- /' If , '~ \ 'I . I ~ \ 4>--~ \' ir- ": ;J..i==J. !:==- ! . -t=.! !ri=~ 1'1 i I ! -- j . I .f, - ~ Ii , i i [I II z o i= < > w -' W 0- '" -< w ~~ z~ , . iF .. i .:r ~. )"'7';-. ~=~;I I: t, v. . - ',j I ; ~ \ 1 . .:~: . i .~. I. i; 1 I! I' 11 - )c...''----c7-T-~-'r II I / ',7 ~ I: ; ~ 1 r i L _ ~ '\ I \:: j r i~-:- jll l' I ,I . I /-1 (,"~ li-,.< It ~ .;;, ,r--:: l' Ie: i '\ - Ii I \ ~ /'- 'C -. : \ ~- ;;~ II: -- I i \ II ..1 I tJ :" II~Ji .' I t ~ -t.~ ',;, t- I ll~ '.J~' ~ /i. [j'~ " 'I I \.J. f- ' : .,,\,. '1..W~i):... f.... - j ; I ~1 s f tl!~r":t:L, I ! u.i f,' ~,t ',.-- -i j' ~~+ ';r-, :1 -:=~I.' ~ ii I. I 'I l ~ i - r ~, ,-' ~-1 j~-_I ~! !.. _''-,. '~I ,......, ~ I.' - ~ ~~ .l- Ui: 'r-'- ~-_i . =1 v -- - F'.;~:.. L'- ~ I /![E'~~.' '"I t ~-f" I ~-..J.' , . , r - ! It~ I I, ~ ) l~ ,. ==t .-:-;1 --: (--'=' -, i f l ~ [.; ,\1 II l ~ - 1 i: - -----.ll... ".' 1;( t i ~ 9 '"' <' i;7 ; Ii I i I YOltl01J ' "-:'''18 H01H,f,OI -",.: . ,.-" .. -.: . . 3AOCl8 3Hl G i - j .;_1 I .>_~.I ! , Jl=! L__ ' i=1 I ."" . I ; ~! : ~ h !~I j~1 1:- r"-' 1--- ~ .r-- 1 =1 <f'-l -lr-1r-- I '---i (f~ : " '::j' <<' 1(1 i ,1<_ '. ' \\~;.J i,''''--' I ", , .~ :I-j , ., 1" ~~l 1l_ Ilf-' ", I <t ~_. r~ 1.--. f-..... ;. I- N: "'~ t f. fc- i I I k.,... j (<> ~ r<, , , J-.~I . j . fl1~1' . I ~.:-I ! I I i 'I I i I II , J ;~ ~.... '. ~" \ I I Ir ~ if -'; ~~)! :i~r-- ~ j -I I I "<< l.. ~ 'I /, I . . . . ,j i: I 1 I : 4,' , ... , r ~ <-.' :., ct t~~"~0 en; I !t=:J: <Q z o ~ 5 >I UI, ...l W :r I-i ::J o ~ .J < ;::;, ~, Ilj. i' f I < ...-'------.--..--~-.-'-_______.L.______.__ '1,1.-I~, . j r II r' i I: " I . r ~ '.t :1 <Z , ~ I ;1 ~- .' ,f! if 1 , ~ I !~~r' ~p : ~~f' Of r l~; , I ;: I (" ~ ' z! 3 < ~ ~ , [ ~ I c~ I ~ ----..~_ _._..,J;~.llllll."" " '-"I ....__.._~~.._--r__~, ._ LAC A TION MAP~ BOYNTON BEACH SHOPPING CENTER t1~1 I - .. D :.....1.. --..,j J,C' ~~ t- , \ u .1 o 1/8 1/4 MILES II 800 FE~T PLA ~ II # r R~ r / / o 400