REVIEW COMMENTS
_AEMORANDUM
TO
Mr. James ('.,()lden
DATE
11/02/88
,.1\.11
"ROM
Lt. Dale S. Hamnack
5U8JR'CT
Causeway Square
As per our discussion at the Technical Review Board meeting on 01 November 88,
I am reccmnending the followinq:
1. Stop sign at intersection at NW corner of Walgreens
2. Change all signage to reflect reversal of one way
traffic to the r~ar of the property.
.
",
;m:;;L
Lt. Dale S. Hamnack
DSH/lav
f
,~
p[ JJ~ (j)
Pt!-= @
tJLJZC (])
(G)jCr ( (j)
s,
T fit- t;. R tJ V E S f'f 0 F' P :r AI c... {E AI' T!5 !:::..
SOIAJrRE FooT A-t.E foR (06L/3/(S To T/l/:= ).) 1~A-J2 (9/: 7ltE
_'J rt 0 t p :r AI ~ c'" E AI r E;2 /! uS T fiE .:r AI C{ fA ;J [=: j) .l/ll litES Ck fA~;e /.3
r a 0 / -1- tt E {Ai { P( LA- r .:r 0 A/ ;=-0/< ;- If E J"ito I / ~--j;~ C L'= A/ ll3/(
I j( 0;> /-'= j( ..5.r Ii AI A- ~ E r f It V 1:=-/1 E- Jv' T )1 A- j( !--:; AI tLf rC? R t="ti;f l=S- S
~... ..-.--.....-..-... -- _.
L Jr)/ r: & AI /0 ? t"Z: j.) I If WI ()? .J tA It T r a J.! /V t) A/ t Y )
PUL!; -/70(.-1)// Ell (to.ffr:rAltl J1-s cJ?fC2..5i=j) To j]Lj)? t l/otfA/7l=-J)
t:r?./'f-TIJJu.. _~lfout.j) BE l'ROf/J:f>/.:-j) )-to-UCi. j-It/3 J2 {='/!-J( o,F
Tit E {EN T L-::/:,-' w Ic:r u If r :;:-/Vl<.- To 8 E j)i>t)E~ rL':::jJ JA/wA-x j)
L!Atfr:rAlt.. PE1Arts To 1.'?/3 fRoV-TP,Ejj
!!< (;] Ft~-= R r ( 0 fA! IJ ;.: (.( /0 /) i~ J) r L .It /;= A (-/-A r IF JJ fie { [;=-> 5.
f,fs f I1t Air A-toi/?- f'>. o. w, (7A/E Foj! ,FrfPJ.:,f At.. iJ w)I AA/j)
OLp jJ J J-JE ffwy.
6, /12ot'/..:::Rrl OW)/~fZ To/)!-=rJ':;-{Are- ;?'cY,w, ro/( Oc..j) P-iJ-.:rE
(IlA/f. Y"o f~ff-T /1<0/1 ([3J)f775,kLrllt-: t/2Foj( To rifE
lf5r/tA)/[E &f ~ k b-LOc;, lE/2A-I- T
7 Pfv't~{t:lt[!-A 70 {Iff-(} )(.1/, w. wij)rlt FoR. O[jj !):r)l.)~j3. /fwy To
!f-l (.? FAr)j t:- F JA- >:r f3J L i ;- 'I C7 r- PRO f&3(3 Jj ;< ok/> W A- y
J Ii F'/! 0 v f)[ E )j T-~
)' ;J fV E[ ~ t/~)( ;0 (o);}: (. {!-'=-j':-T TM R J/ tA-)/f~ .J)ll& /1.1-1 A/
_5'/foFrTJv?- (f~),;rt-=f( Pl<rv!3(JJA-Y f;fo/t _5~W .lffl!:o./rtlf-
O)t/ 0 [/) /, J JJ- f !f//l7>
1 KOJtp w!j- /' A-~[) -~l u. JI/f{ :r J1 /~~)o [; J:/tE.A/J-s P f r~ t /'t 1);;3 (5
r CJ fJ E J/L~ c r5 __5 5/f)( r 15/ j.- E -l-r It f .5 ("1f;V/f- )? S l & ii /5"-
([)J1/'c E J E J) /~l(J c? R To 7 HE {/ t EJI-7)/ Ii. o,F 7ft;:
5jt~ /,p;rlJ([ C'EIVT I: R
!O,
If,
/ J. '
r fv;(AJ @,
{Ntl~
tfYf)/@
,~
f3e D (;, (!:j
k w:rJJ (!!J
f w, (jj)
PiAlt, @
f X:[.5 T J )J tL j) R v {> [IA l< {3 ~ 0)/;= F j) f-/! J;- (, /f w .Y To B ~
R E )( cl V c P /tAl)) j.\ F (CJA.;_5 T R fA C r [::Jj J C7 /i? (,1 v:r PEA-
{e: Jv TIAI (j c:Ju.s /? J1- 1.5!:-/) (fA /? i? A-Al,L) s..:[p Fit! /1-1. Ie
fL-Jt-TTJ))~ l.s J<Eau:rtL=p TFCJuT{o!5 A/?'L7:.Toj?E
JtJrJ); T Jr:rJ/ ED a);P?!< S cl))-/? Jr T E cywA/J:;Ls" If.:rl F/?c//j
/1Jrl/t! S If a P Pl)./4- (e.AJ r pI? r
flEA)? c!Jf _C;ftd/tP+/v~ (E)Jr[:R j& IfJrVE ~ /!trxc/'J(.TA-l)
j(oClF rXi:hT/1E/ilT T6J (&.Jv'LEA-t. /!l:C!f/tAJJ(A-C
I-~ () (;{ J t/1/3 ;1/ r A-)Jj) F cJ j\," ;11 0 j.s f Il:r r -F~ /1- T :{ 0 /V
II {t:1)J{, DLO{;" wJrU.. To J5~ ftA-cEP A- A.rAi, ;2 J r)2o/t
lA-v tf3!( T 7 LJ PES itS ;.ZEd al f~f5P is'7 cc?!) L-. life- ;;?tJElJ
If (GJ.AJC, j?L/~. whee. L=)./{f(o.Jr{ffJ::~ (JJN fltk'/::JAlt<.. A-f2j..;:ASj
1>/:. f lJ E VJ It '/) t j) uJ11 t~ r e- j( !/+ j) ;1-(0#( w;:.z3.T [lo t{.il/j).Jr/C Y
/tlfJrRt:r/{(.5fJrt[3S Atok4. WE3( f,f.ttJ?ERTI j)oalVjJ/r,RY
R Etl CA J" tC E j1J}J. t2f ! /t-JI j)__c;c)r P E -> 112 J P
Sltow 5ErgJr{k.5 Foj( SIC, j)l-::PT. .sToRE
. !
)/ ffD Co)/ r r)j UP 3S J. j: ! tJr,A/Jjs (/rP E 5" T/?:r I~ Ate;' AIeL
-.
l'L-=,R:r!1 ErE R ;f([ Ess /(oA-j)
j)1AJ1P~t;TEf~ ,J/fA-1? Ov-TtoT E :r-~ )lorJtI'I~f.otN:r/rrELI
t.. CJ( ArE j)
II- U [1r1VJf. c.lt P t: () A-f? l3/t ~ !f2;;-Jr- s 7)/ t/t-RlI);C- ! &' r (0 BE
lKCiTEL {/3P 8'7 ('ff')cJt.l5EJ) (v.kJ/.JJ/tc
fc,,)/4. CJj) JNTfR:(o/\ lltR./::f/i?t !ollhT/.-=j(S/:CT-TdN ).PI>1-(EAlT To
f;,fr.lrJ L rcA [I f)1t-~ r/1tf.:."o?~R JrLrCiA//1EJ/T
p,w.(jjj
,.. :3
-;:;t: .
2 t,
PfAI1f5 ! J: R ~)/ S-/:. 51))): tJ F [;V.f;(l;{; j) r;:.rE .5/toV<l-{) Jj l~ AJrfi tlY fJ
PJrRkJ)jtc SPIf-{f: CklovtT ft-IJ3ACC:AiT ro I?L;::rA--F[. k" T-s.
J#-t-O!< t( r: c r
/1 1\
PJLrV E . Ttt R fA Jr T 1; L Dr:;, /~ tv:r [[ A) E&' fAr;C /.- cc;Oh<v-F T rc.A<~',-
1I.> E A- P//,) 0 vA- L P ( {' -117 (0 [.I(!V[ -TL-.
STAFF COMMENTS
THE GROVE SHOPPING CENTER
SITE PLAN MODIFICATION
Engineering Department: See attached memo.
Utilities Department: See attached memo.
Police Department: See attached memo.
Public Works Department: See attached memo.
Planning Department: See attached memos ( 2) .
Forester: See attached memo.
Building Department: See attached memo.
M E M 0 RAN DUM
July 2, 1986
TO: Mr. Jim Golden
Planning Department
FROM: Tom Clark
City Engineer
RE: Site Plans for the Grove
COMMENTS:
1. A permit for the construction in Old Dixie Highway will be
required from the County.
2. Drainage calculations submitted to the Water Management
District are requested.
3. An extruded curb is shown. More substantial construction
is recommended but is not a code requirement at this time.
4. Dimensions required to locate the limits of the landscaped
areas and edges of parking lots without scaling or refering
to other drawings should be added to the paving grading and
drainage plans.
5. Radii should be indicated on the plans for all turnouts and
landscaped areas.
6. The required R.O.W. deed to the County for additional R,O.W.
should be prepared and submitted.
7. Traffic control devices must conform to the "Manual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices", a national and state
standard where the general public is invited.
8. Section F-F should show that the minimum roadway is 27 ft.
~v eA-' ~ d~
Tom Clark
TAC:ck
MEMORANDUM
TO :
Car~en Annunziato, Planning Director
DATE:
June 30, 1986
SUBJECT:
TRB cO~Ments - The Grove
This DepartMent's approval is conditional upon the following changes in
the plans:
1> Additional gate valves and post indicator valves will be needed at
various locations in the water distribution systeM.
Z> Fire hydrants Must be a MiniMUM 10 feet frOM the building. Water
~ains Must be no closer than 15 feet to the building or proposed
coolers.
3)
Easel'lents
will only
including
sprinkler
will be needed for all water and sewer lines. The City
Maintain Main line sewers, and water lines up to and
the Meters, hydrants and post indicator valves for
lines.
4) The water Main connection to the existing line on Old Dixie
Highway Must be planned for early Morning hours, and closely
coordinated with this DepartMent. We reCOMMend that the two
valves and the tee be pre-asseMbled. then installed into the
existing line as a unit.
Sincerely,
~. ..' g7
I~// /~~?a(
Peter V. Mazzella,
Uti 1 ity Engineer
cc: File
.-- .
.AEMORANDUM
TO
Planning Dept.
Attn: Mr. J. Golden
DATE:
J u 1 Y 2, 1 986
FILE
FROM
SU8J~CT
Lt. Dale S. Hammack
Pol ice Dept.
Grove Shopping Center
As per the discussion at the T.R.B. meeting of July 1, 1986, the following
changes are recommended:
1. Pole mounting, photocell activate perimeter lighting located
to the rear (West and North sides) facing toward the building.
2. Extend Northerly the widened throat of intersection at main
entrance.
3. Align the intersection in the North East corner of the parking
lot.
/I €le~Ck
Police Dept.
DH:as
MEMORANDUM
July 2, 1986
TO:
Chairman and Members
Planning and Zoning Board
FROM:
Carmen S. Annunziato
Planning Director
RE:
The Grove Shopping Center Site Plan Modification
Shared Parking Allocation
Section 11-H (13) of the Zoning Code contains the following,
recently-amended provision for shared parking:
13. Parking spaces required in this Ordinance for one use or
structure may be allocated in part or in whole for the
required parking spaces of another use or structure if
quantitative evidence is provided showing that parking
demand for the different uses or structures would occur on
different days of the week or at different hours.
Quantitative evidence shall include but not be limited to
the following:
(a) Field studies and traffic counts prepared by a traffic
consultant experienced in parking studies.
(b) Adjustments for seasonal variations.
(c) Estimates for peak parking demand based on statistical
data furnished by the Urban Land Institiute or some
other recognized land planning and design organization.
All data furnished must be statistically valid. In
addition, a minimum buffer of 10% shall be provided to
ensure that a sufficient number of parking spaces are
available at times of peak hour use. Said buffer is to be
calculated based on the following formula:
surplus shared parking1
Buffer = - - - 2 X 100%
on-site + shared parking provided
1
1Shared parking spaces not required by the City of
Boynton Beach zoning regulations for the proposed use.
2parking spaces required for the proposed use as per the
City of Boynton Beach zoning regulations.
Evidence for joint allocation of required space shall be
submitted to the Technical Review Board, and approval of joint
allocation of required parking spaces shall be made by the
Council, after review and recommendations by the Planning and
Zoning Board.
With respect to the above, Goldenholz-Fischer Architects and
Planners, agent for the Grove'partners Limited, are requesting
approval of a shared parking allocation in connection with a site
plan modification to the previously approved shopping center.
The shopping center is to be located at the intersection of
Federal Highway and Old Dixie Highway, west side. The applicant
is requesting approval of the shared parking allocation in order
to allow for the addition of an 11,431 square foot cinema which
would include four screens and 877 fixed seats.
The proposed modification would include 153,156 square feet of
retail floor space and the 877 seat (11,431) square foot cinema.
The parking requirement for the retail shopping center is 153,156
f 200 = 766 spaces while the parking requirement for the cinema
is 877 seats T 4 = 220 spaces. The proposed site plan would
provide for 818 on-site parking spaces which would meet the code
requirement for the retail floor space with the remaining 52
parking spaces being allocated to the cinema. The additional
parking required for the 877 seat cinema (220 - 52 = 168 spaces)
is to be shared parking.
According to the Shared Parking Study prepared by Keith and
Schnars, P.A. for the Grove Shopping Center, the peak hour demand
for parking for both the retail shopping center and the cinema
combined would occur on Saturday afternoons between the hours of
1:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. This projection of peak hour parking
demand is based on Urban Land Institute data which has been
adjusted in part to incorporate site specific conditions. Based
on this worst case scenario, the highest parking accumulation for
the retail portion of the shopping center would occur at
approximately 2:00 p.m. Saturday afternoon and would require 574
of the required 766 parking spaces required by code, leaving a
statistical surplus of 192 parking spaces to be shared by the
cinema as follows:
On-site parking allocated to cinema
Shared parking available from retail
Total parking available to cinema at peak
= 52 spaces
= 192 spaces
= 244 spaces
2
The above analysis indicates that sufficient parking is available
at peak hour use to meet the zoning code requirement for the
cinema (220 spaces) leaving a statistical surplus of 24 shared
parking spaces to be allocated toward the calculation of the
required 10% buffer as follows:
24
52 + 168
x 100% = 10.9%
Therefore, given the worst case scenario of total parking
accumulation (Saturdays at 2:00 p.m.), the shared parking
allocation for the Grove Shopping Center would still allow for a
statistical surplus of at least 24 parking spaces.
On Tuesday, July 1, 1986 the Technical Review Board met at which
time they recommended approval of the shared parking allocation
as submitted. It was the consensus of the TRB that the proposed
shared parking allocation was prepared and documented in
accordance with code requirements and that there was sufficient
opportunity available for shared parking to occur on-site given
the mix of uses in the proposed shopping center.
~A~-S:- ~~
flat
3
MEMORANDUM
2 July 1986
TO:
Chairman and Members
Planning and Zoning Board
FROM:
Carmen S. Annunziato
Planning Director
RE:
The Grove Shopping Center - Staff Commments
Please be advised of the following comments from the Planning
Department in connection with the above-referenced request for
a site plan modification.
1. Square footage for coolers located to the rear of the
shopping center are to be included in square footage
and parking calculations. Additional coolers to be placed
to the rear of the shopping center will require site plan
approval.
2. Lighting details are to be provided.
3. All landscaped areas within and adjacent to the parking lot
access aisles are to be protected by six-inch raised concrete
curbing,
4. Interior parking lot intersection adjacent to retail "A"
is to have a proper alignment.
5. A proper transition is to be provided at the egress to the
main shopping center driveway in the vicinity of the interior
intersection, northwest corner.
6. The 10% buffer required by the zoning regulations for shared
parking is to be maintained upon incorporation of the staff
comments.
~~~
/bks
. ,
__\EMORANDUM
TO
Carmen Annunziato
Planning Director
DATE'
July 1, 1986
FILE
FROM
Kevin J. Hallahan
Forester/Horticulturist
SUBJECT The Grove Shopping Center
Site-Plan Modification
This memorandum is in reference to the tree management plan which
will be affected by the site plan modifications, I discussed the
changes with the landscape architect and felt it would be advis-
able to show how any of the proposed changes would affect trees
as outlined in the plan. An addendum would be submitted to the
plan showing the trees affected. The newly installed landscaping
would also be affected and should be addressed on the landscape
plan. The tree management plan will remain intact and reflect the
approved changes.
Also, there should be a 2/ foot landscape strip behind the Junior
Department Store. All landscaped areas should be protected in the
parking area with a six inch non-mountable curb,
.24 .
~~-/7t':~. 'fl a L L'~--/'--4,-,/
Kev in J. all ahan 6-^---
KJH:ad
= I". ~: KEITH and
": ~ ~= SCHNARS
June 24, 1986
Mr. William Walsh, P.E.
Florida Department of Transportation
780 Southwest 24th Street
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33315
RE: Section 93010: S.R. 5 (U.S. 1) at Old Dixie Hwy.
Signal Warrants Analysis
Our Project No. 11824.01J
Dear Mr. Walsh:
On February 7, 1986, Keith and Schnars, P.A., submitted a signal
justification study for the above referenced intersection to serve
the Boynton Beach Shopping Center. As the attached letter indi-
cates, the Department concurred with our proposal.
Since that time, the development, now referred to as "The Grove,"
has experienced a minor site plan change. Traffic volumes as a
result of the site plan change are reflected on the table below.
SITE PLAN COMPARISON
Boynton Beach Ctr. The Grove
Daily Trips 10,717 10,863
PM In 458 441
PM Out 490 470
As shown, The Grove will generate an additional 146 daily trips as
compared to the Boynton Beach Shopping Center. The peaking charac-
teristics of The Grove will result in slightly fewer peak hour
trips.
It should also be noted that the Boynton Beach Shopping Center
study indicated that ten percent (10%) of the project traffic exit-
ing the site would do so at the northerly access on U.S. 1, with
five percent (5%) being left turns. The City of Boynton Beach has
since prohibited this left turn movement. Left turning vehicles
previously assigned to this access will now exit the site at Dixie
Highway and will become left turning vehicles onto Federal Highway.
This will increase the left turning volumes at the subject intersec-
tion to fifty-five percent (55%) of the total.
6500 North Andrews Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309-2132 . (305) 776-1616
-
: 11':. ~ :.
: ~ ~=
Page Two - June 24, 1986
William Walsh, P.E., FDOT
The Grove (11824.01J)
In conclusion, The Grove will generate more daily trips than the
Boynton Beach Shopping Center. Volumes assigned in the afternoon
peak hour as left turning vehicles at the subject intersection will
increase from 245 to 259.
The previous study indicated three separate signal warrants were
met. This will also hold true with The Grove as additional traffic
will be generated.
We are, therefore, proceeding under the assumption that the Depart-
ment's approval for signalization at Federal Highway and Dixie
Highway applies to the revised conditions. We are proceeding on
behalf of the owner of The Grove to design and construct the signal
so that it can be activated when the shopping center opens.
I have also enclosed a revised site plan for your records. If you
need any additional information, please feel free to contact me
directly.
Sincerely,
KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A.
ENGINEERS-PLANNERS-SURVEYORS
..~ , i//' d~
.1/V-/J-~-':.--:~ /y~ t'l,~..^;-:.-~:7
Frederick W. Schwartz, P.E.
Director of Traffic Engineering
FWS/DJM/en
Enclosures
cc: Charles Walker, Palm Beach County
Jim Golden, City of Boynton Beach
Departmel1.t of Transportation
11011 GRAHA AI
GOVERNOJ<
Thomas E. Drawdy
.E:C~CTA'n
780 Southwest 24 Street
Fort Lauderdale. Florida 33315-2696
Telephone: (305) 524-8621
March 18, 1986
Mr. Frederick W. Schwartz, P.E.
Director Traffic Operations
Keith and Schnars, P.A.
1115 N.E, 4th Avenue
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33304-1996
Dear Mr. Schwartz:
Re: Section 93010; State Road 5 (U.S. 1)
at Old Dixie Hwy..
Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County -
Signal ~arrant Analysis
This is in response to your letter of February 7, 1986.
We have reviewed the information provided in your report and
letter and concur with your proposal. We will provide the necessary
authorization upon receipt of plans meeting with our approval.
As to your question concerning a date of signal activation, we
will permit the traffic signal to be turned on at the time of the
shopping center's occupation.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact this
office.
~XE'
Assistant District
Traffic Operations Engineer
WAL:hf
cc: Mr. Charles R. Walker, Jr.
--...-
- -- --
----
- -- -~--- ---- - ~~-~--~---- -~ ~ ------- -~--- --
THE GROVE
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A.
Engineers-Planners-Surveyors
6500 North Andrews Avenue
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33309-2132
June, 1986
Our Project Number 11824.01
I. INTRODUCTION
Keith and Schnars, P.A., has been retained to prepare a
traffic impact report for The Grove, a shopping center loca-
ted in the City of Boynton Beach in Palm Beach County.
The Grove will be located on the northwest quadrant of
U. S. 1 (Federal Highway) and Old Dix ie Highway. At the
request of the City of Boynton Beach, a study area was estab-
lished to determine the traffic impact of the proposed devel-
opment on the local street network.
This study area is bounded by Woolbright Road (Southwest
15th Avenue) to the north, Lake Ida Road (Northeast 4th
Street) to the south, Ocean Boulevard (S.R. A-I-A) to the
east, and Congress Avenue to the west. Figure 1 graphically
illustrates the study area and the relative location of the
site within it.
- 1 -
WOClL..-n III
15TH AVE
$( 23111 AYE
~
I ~
~
! ! e
i I
.
z
ME 14 IT
~
ME ITIl ST
MEmlT
~
.
,
~
c
E
,
LOCA TION
MAP
Iei(L uJ ScllllUl, P .AI
~
(]~~
,...,
~ -II.AMD-MYJI_
~
NORTH
FIGURE
II. TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION
Trip making characteristics vary wi th the type of land
use being considered.
Trip generation rates were obtained
from the report entitled "Trip Generation" which is published
,
by the Institute of Transportation Engineers.
Thi.s report is
based on numerous studies conducted throughout the United
States and is generally accepted as the authoritati.~e source
for trip generation standards.
The shopping center will house a 153,059 square foot
retail area and a 877 seat movie cinema.
Table I indicates
the land use and its generation rate. Table II indicates the
land use, its size and the generated trips per day.
Table
III indicates the PM peak hour trips.
Generally, AM peak
hour trips are also generated.
However, as thi s type of
development dictates that the PM peak hour will have the most
adverse impact on the roadway network, this was the only peak
period addressed.
TABLE I
TRIP GENERATION RATES
Land Use
Rate - Daily
Rate - PM Peak
Retail - ITE 822
66.7/1,000 sq.ft.
2.85 in, 3.05 out/
1,000 sq. ft.
.006 in, .003 out/
seat
Cinema *
0.75/seat
* ITE rates not available.
stud i e s.
Estimates based on similar
- 3 -
TABLE II
DAILY TRIP GENERATION
Land Use
Size
Trips/Day
10,205
Re ta i 1
153,059 sq.ft.
Cinema
877 seats
658
TABLE III
PH PEAK HOUR GENERATION
Land Use Inbound Outbounct Total
--- -,- - --.--- -.---.---
Re ta i 1 436 467 903
Cinema 5 3 8
The projected distribution of traffic to and from the
site was based on the population distribution of the surroun-
ding area and field observation of the existing distribution
of trips for adjacent developments in the surrounding area.
Distributions throughout the study area are shown in
Figure 2 along with the respective daily trips generated by
the shopping center.
The ingress and egress routes, and distributions rela-
tive to the site, are shown in Figures 3 and 4, while Figures
5 and 6 illustrate the peak hour project related traffic
based on this distribution.
- 4 -
IIOOlIlllllKT lID
IE 2WI AYE
@
!
I 0
&
! r
c i
I I
.
:IE
~
@
,
1/1
I
~
NORTH
~ XX% - DISTRIBUTION
XX - DAIL Y PROJECT
TRIPS
DISTRIBUTIONS
AND
DAIL Y PROJECT TRAFFIC
Keii1 lid &:1.In, P .A.
... ~ fUlOD ~ IJIVI,..
~
IJ~~
~
--_._----_.._,---_._.__..,._.,---_.__._--_._-_._.__...~-_.~-_._----_...,--
FIGURE
2
SE 23RD AVE
40% ~
SE 36TH AVE 101.
INGRESS
DISTRIBUTION %
5% 50%
15%
1
SITE 50% I
5%
.
>-
~ 1
w 5%
x
o
o
....J
o
I 1
35% 5%
5% --' 5% 1
51. --. 35%
Kei(1 ud Selman, P .A.
~........ ".,IYI..
.
>-
;=
:I:
....J
<t
0::
W
o
w
u..
~
~
~
~
NORTH
FIGURE
3
SE 23RD AVE
I 1
40% 15% ~
NORTH
5%~
SITE
~
35% ~
.
:>- 40%
~
:J:
w 5%
x 1
0
0 5% 35%
...J
5% 0 J 1
SE 36TH AVE J +-- 5%
.
:>-
~
:J:
...J
-ex:
0::
w
0
w
~
~ FIGURE
EGRESS Keif1 ud Selman, P .A.
m~ 4
DISTRIBUTION % IIIIND -IU.RD - bftRla ~
.'
~--------_._---
~-~- -- -------------~
66
SE 23RD AVE 1
176 ~
22 221 ~
J 1
221 1 NORTH
J 22
SITE
1 1
1 155 22
. 22
>-
:t:
:E:
~
x
2i
0
-oJ
0
SE 36TH AVE
44~ 22 -.J 22 1
22~
155
.
>-
~
:E:
-oJ
<C(
a::
w
0
W
\. \ \ LL
PM PEAK
-- PROJECT TRAFFIC
INBOUND
Ieia III Scban, P A
., ~"I_ 1.._,..-
.
,...,
FIGURE
5
(IC
- .
SE 23RD AVE
.-
-- I I
188 71
~
-
- NORTH
24~
. SITE
~
165~
.
:>-
~ 188
, :J: 1
w 24
x 1
0
0
...J 24 165
24 0 J 1
SE 36TH AVE J
+--24
,
.
:>-
~
:J:
...J
<t
0::
W
0
W
~
PM PEAK Keiihald SehDan, P.A. ~ FIGURE
PROJECT TRAFFIC m~ 6
OUTBOUND DBNIIIS - fIUNMDI- ~ ~
III. OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Utilizing the results of the trip generation and distri-
bution calculations, it was then possible to assign the site
related traffic to the existing roadway network.
At the request of the City of Boynton Beach, four (4)
critical intersections and six (6) roadway segments were then
analyzed to yield the effect of the site related traffic on
the selected intersections and roadway segments.
The roadway segments include:
1. U.S. 1 (Federal Highway)
from Old Dixie Highway to Southeast 23rd Avenue
2. U.S. 1 (Federal Highway)
from Old Dixie Highway to Southeast 36th Avenue
(Gulfstream Road)
3. Southeast 23rd Avenue
from U.S. 1 (Federal Highway) to Seacrest Boulevard
4. Southeast 23rd Avenue
from Seacrest Blvd. to 1-95
5. Southeast 23rd Avenue
from 1-95 to Congress Avenue
6. Old Dixie Highway
from U.S. 1 (Federal Highway) to Southeast 36th Ave.
The critical intersections include:
1. U.S. 1 (Federal Highway) at Southeast 23rd Avenue
2 . U.S. 1 (Federal Highway) at Old Dixie Highway
3. U.S. 1 (Federal Highway) at Southeast 36th Avenue
4 . Old Dixie Highway at Southeast 36th Avenue
- 10 -
The analysis of impact on the roadway network was
examined at two levels:
1. The existing traffic and its level of service.
2. The existing traffic plus the shopping center's pro-
jected traffic and its level of service.
The Level of Service (LOS) determinat ion was made in
accordance wi th gu ide 1 ines spec i f ied by the Florida Depart-
ment of Transportation.
The respective volumes are compared
to roadway capacities to determine the proper level of ser-
vice. The capacities used are shown in Table IV.
TABLE IV
UTPS DAILY CAPACITIES
OUTLYING BUSINESS DISTRICT
LEVEL OF
SERVICE "c"
LEVEL OF
SERVICE "D"
2 lanes
11,800
14,200
4 lanes, divided
27,000
32,400
Existing traffic volumes were collected from Florida
Department of Transportation and from actual counts collected
by Keith and Schnars personnel.
Table V indicates the road-
way segments with the existing average daily traffic (ADT)
volumes and capacities, and the segment's operating levels of
services (LOS).
- 11 -
TABLE V
THE GROVE
EXISTING AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
Roadway Segment
# of Lanes Volume Capacity LOS
u.S. 1 (Federal Highway):
Old Dixie to SE 23 Ave.
Old Dixie to SE 36 Ave.
4LD
4LD
18,510
17,040
Southeast 23rd Avenue:
U.S. 1 to Seacrest
Seacreast to 1-95
1-95 to Congress
2L
2L
2L
6,179
8,340
6,237
Old Dixie Highway:
U.S. 1 to SE 36 Ave.
2L
919
27,000
27,000
A
A
11,800
11,800
11,800
A
A
A
11,800
A
Table VI then provides for the existing ADT coupled with
the site generated traffic providing the expected volumes and
ultimate levels of service when the shopping center is in
full operation.
- 12 -
TABLE VI
THE GROVE
AVtRAGE DAILY TRAFfIC
WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC
Roadway Se~ent
# of Lanes Volume Capacity LOS
U.S. 1 (Federal Highway):
Old Dixie to SE 23 Ave. 4LD
Old Dixie to SE 36 Ave. 4LD
24,485
21,385
'.2.7,;)0:,\
C
B
27,000
Southeast 23rd Avenue:
U.S. 1 to Seacrest
Seacreast to 1-95
1-95 to Congress
2L
2L
2L
10,524
10,513
8,410
11,800
11,800
11,800
c
C
A
Old Dixie Highway:
U.S. 1 to SE 36 Ave.
2L
1,462
11,800
A
As stipulated by the FDOT, facilities operating in Level
of Service "C" or better are deemed acceptable. Any project
that causes roadway levels of service to fall below Level of
Service "C" may be responsible for roadway improvements, so
that Level of Service "C" can be maintained.
- 13 -
1
As illustrated in Table VI, all of the critical roadway
links examined will operate at Level of Service "e" or
better.
Pl'i Peak Hour Turning 1'1ovements were conducted at the
f 0 U ( 4) c r i tic a I i n t e r s e c t ion s to de term i net h e i n t e r s ~ c -
tions' capacities at today's operating conditions. Peak Hour
project related traffic was then appl ied to the existinG
turning movements to det.ennine the intersections' capacil:/
when the shopping center lS in full operation. The results
of the intersection analysis can be found in Appendices A-D.
As shown in Table VII, the proposed shopping center will have
no adverse effect on the operating levels of the inter-
sections.
TABLE VII
Intersection LOS Existing LOS With Project
Federal Hwy & SE 23 Ave A B
Federal Hwy & Old Dixie Hwy A B
Federal Hwy & SE 36 Ave A B
Old Dixie Hwy & SE 36 l'l.ve A A
- 14 -
IV. RECOMMENDATIONS
A traffic signal justification study was perforrled by
Keith and Schnars, under separate cover, for the inte~section
of Old Dixie Highway and U.S. 1 (Federal Highway). The
results indicate that when The Grove opens, a signal will be
warranted, and should be instal1ed.
In conjunction with the signal installation and to opti-
mize the operation of the signal, the eastbound lanes at the
intersection should include an exclusive left turn la~e and a
southbound right turn lane would be desirable. See concep-
tual design in Figure 7.
In addition, an eastbound left turn lane should be
provided at the main entrance to the shopping center.
V. CONCLUSIONS
As a result of the analysis described herein, it can be
concluded that the traffic resulting from the development of
The Grove can be adequately accommodated on the surrounding
street network.
- 15 -
J',yo..o
~4-G'
C'4~-9
~C'c
~J'J'
~
NORTH
\.
r r r
EI1
FEDERAL HWY.
.... -
CONCEPTUAL
ROADWAY
DESIGN
IeifL ul Scbut, P.A. .
~ I_Jl,A.-.,-.,u. ,...,
FIGURE
7
APPEfWIX A
U.S. 1 (FEDERAL HIGH~AY)
AT
SOUTHEAST 36TH AVENUE
KEITH
C R I T I CA L
At-J D S C Ht-JA R S, P _ A .
t-1 OV Et'1 Et'.JT At-."JA L 'y' S I S
...........FEDERHL &. SE 36 <GULFSTREAt1) - E~.ISl1tJC,.*........
1 L' 1 ~ 85
**......**.**..........*...*.......
LA!~E
1
2
3
4
5
6
LE\,.JEL OF SER\Jl CE A
SAT UF:ATl OtJ ~. 3
CR ITl CAL N/S ,)OL 746
CR n 1 CAL E/W VOL 1 2 1
eRJT 1 CAL SU~1' 867
***********.*.*.....**.....******..*.*
NORI HB OUND
MO') WI Dl h
Rl.
I. .
L. .
12.0
12.0
12.0
LAt~E GEOMETR,'
S (i UI H 8 0 lit W E AS 180 Ui ~ ['J
MU) Lon [;1 H MO'v' L..!I ('"7 H
RI. 12.0 1\1 . J2.0
I. . 12.0 L. . 12.0
L. . 12.0
WEST80LY~[1
M D) l.n (, T H
Fn.
L. .
12.0
12.D
IRAFF Ie VOLUt1ES
NORTHBOlJ>lD SOUTH80Ut~D EAST80U!~D WESTBOUND
LEFT 237 6 63 9
THRU 960 792 <; 3
RIGHT 12 30 102 9
TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (tt/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR
NORTHBOLt~D 10 0 1
SOUTHBOlJ'4D 10 0 1
EASTBOUND 10 0 1
WESTBOllJD 10 0 1
PHt;S ING N/S
E/W
PEDESTRIAN ACT IVITY
CiCLE LENGTH
THRU -RIGHT
LEFT
lNPU'T VOLUt1E
ADJUSTED VOL
~PAC ITi
NO:J HI ErH
:4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WI1H OVERLAP)
: 2. HEAV I EST TUR'~ PROTECTED
1 . (I - 99 OIPED~./HR)
90 SECONDS
NORTHBOLIND
560
273
tWRTHBOLJ~D
237
273
o
N/A
CRIT 1 CAL LANE ',)OLL/f'1ES BY MO'JEt1ENT
SOUTHBOUND
473
6
EASTBour~D
1 21
72
LEFT 'TURN CHECI<
SOUTHBOUI~~
6
6
o
N/A
EASTBOurD
63
72
118
NlA
WESTBDUND
12
9
WESTBDUt~D
9
9
o
NO
KEITH AND SCHNARS. P.A.
Engine e rs-Pla nner s-Sur v ey ors
.::E I TH t'-~f.,JL' ~=;CHt.J.::""F':::::. ~ F' _1'''_
C PIT I CA L t-,-, Ct'.._-.' Et-.-' Et.',JT HIJ.....:.. L " ~=. 1 -
FE C. E F:t--=::. L ,~'" :::'; E ,::;:: .:', " c:' U L F ::=;-, F- E'-::':"f 1 ::0
TI,II JE 1 ,~, ,;:! '.
1.-' ... .::.. F- CI,_1 L C.T
.~~~~.~+~+~..~.~*~~~~~.+.~..++.+..
L fi'EL elF- ':C,EF".' ICE E;
~'ri T U F'':'' T I OIJ 5 .:::=.
e F ) T I CHL I'..~. '.'Oe.. :::::.: CI .:;.-
( FIT Ie f-t L E 1,1 '.' 0 L 1 :::::- 1
C F-'! T 1 Cf-'-L t,Ut1 ';:;,' .:=: ()
.~~.~~*~~~.~~~~~~.~+..~~~~~~+~~*.+..*
L.:.:.,t~E
r~c,r::'1 HEe:-=,\.lt ;[,
11':'"' 1.1 I ['TH
L,:.,t : 1:[0'1ET~,
':.CiUThECC,.." 'L'
t.1':".' II) [TH
E"t--,':'j f:OUl ~~
I.I[':TE':'!U' ,r
, VI" Ii 1 ['I'"
ri (y t I" 1 [ ~ 1-1
,::,
~T . 1 ;::: . [I
i . . 1 ::: _ (,
L.. 12.(..1
F:T , ! ;::' . Ci
F'T _ 1:':.:<
L. _ 1 :: _ ':.
FT. 1 :.' .:'
L. . 1:' ,':'
.'J
T I . 1:':' I Cl
L. . 1:.0
4
'"
~,
'~I
NOFTHE:CiUI1D
TFAFF Ie ')C)LUt1E':.
SOUTHE:CiUU[, EA~.TE::OUrJ['
I...IE ~,TE:OUIJ['
LEFT
THF.:U
R I C,HT
.",:,::,..,
L,-_' ,
..
-.'
,-,e
C, _I
11 1 :.
12
,-, r:-:-
":'" _I,
.j
54
10':
~'
NORT HE:OUr J[:.
SOUT HE:OUrJD
EA"::,TE:OUt Jr,
h.IE :::.T BOlltJD
TRuel<'::, co
1 (I
1 (i
1 (I
1 (I
LOCAL BUSES . N .HP)
(I
(i
(I
o
PEAK HOUR FACTOF
1
1
1
1
PHA:::. I IJG N/:;:.
E/(..)
F'E['E~:TF:IHtJ ACTI\)Ir,
C 'I C L E L Et ~ I~ T H
: 4. E:OTH TUF't'E: PF OTECTE[, . 1..1 I TH O'.'EF'LAF')
: 2. HEFt.'I E::::T TUF.lJ PF'lYiECTEC,
1 . (I - ';'0;- '. *IF'ED':.. HF')
,;' (I :::. E C or j [, ~,
CF:ITIC;:,L LAflE I.'OLUt'lE:::. E:, l'lor'EtlEtlT
227
Ci
C.
_! ~
lJE':,TE:':",_" .:
1 :.:
(I
THFU -F: I GHT
LEFT
,~\50
~5:=:2
E,.:;,STBouri[,
J C'1
~ .
rWPTHE:C!Utm
'::,0 UT H E: 0 Ut.J Co
LEFT TUFJJ C HEO'
NOPTHE:!:luriC
~,OUTHE:CIUI..J[.
E ;-,'~T E' ,:'IU: ~~,
J,I E ':::1 E: ,:i1Jf J =
IIJF'UT VOLUI.1E
A[,,JU:;:,T E [, I.!OL
CAPf-tCITy
t.l01)H1EIJT
--:":.7
L. "_' ,
I-'~
.=. -'
.;....:.,.
(;
Ci
Ii.....,
t,;-.
_ll
C
(I
(I
It f-t
1 [!~'
1/ ,:.,
Of
KEITH AND SCHNARS. P.A.
E ng I neer a-Planner a-S urvey ors
APPEtWIX B
u.s. 1 (FEDERAL HIGHWAY)
AT
OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY
... E I T H At.J D :=; C HI .,J':4 F~" P. A .
C F: 1 I I CA Lt.., D'.." Et.., E ,.rr At.J,,:=::' L -", ~. I .:::'
.....+..+++++....r::'E~~t-i..._ H:..t"j l~'. OL[' ['};,JE HL'.'1 _. E']::.IIt~C..,~+""""'''.+''+
J r,. E~ r~',
.+++~.+++..+~......~.+.+....+~+...
LE' 'E~ O~ SEPt'j CE A
S....,: UF.:.- T ] en;
[ F ] 1 ] C h '- r~ ~,
[ F: ] ! J lH L E il.'!
e F: ! I J C':':' ~ t, U"
,-. r-.
~.::::. .=,
i,} [, L ~. E: c..
1,1[\_ 1 (I 4
690
*.+..~~+~+~~~++*~~+.++++~++~++~~*.+++
L~I~~ f:EOt'lETR\
r~:=1 F: ~E [I ~!l.J[!
::' =1 U"T HE: Ci Ur~[;
EH~TE,DUt~['
11 tJ.I 1\1 J L ~...
I,' E: T 8 [I UIJ L\
~;;=!' t..11[liH
L,:.;'E
r1C" , : L,TH
tit}. t.! 1 [:1 H
F:' ,
1::' I 0
~,.
~ ::: . (I
L.O
12, (I
>nL
J 2, C:
F.... ....
12. (I
L. .
::::. (i
1 L', [I
,.
,.
, . .
~.
:!
,
~ r .
5
Co
t~Ci FT HE: D L.i!~[,
T F:riF ~ I ( 'v'OL Ur-1E~,
~;O UT H8 DUNC E.:- ~,T 8 G Ur~[!
IIJE::,T80iJ:~[
.oJ
.,j
o
(I
6
LEFT
TI-IFU
RIGHT
36
1002
15
6
64E:
e ';'
"'''7
~'.
24
!~onH80ur,J['
SOUTH80LII.j[,
EA::,180Ut~[j
WEET8DUr Jr'
TPUC ~:E (>:
10
1 (I
10
10
LOC~L K! :,E~.
(It. 'HF )
(I
(:
(I
(I
PE~~ HOUR FACTOR
P HA::, 1 t~ [, N./ E;
E/l~
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
C!TLE LEt~GIH
: 1. N E 1T HER T U Rt.j ~, F' OT E CT E D
: 1. ~~E lTHEF' TURt~ PROTECTEC,
1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS,HR'
9Ci SECOt~[''::,
eRn 1 CA~ LAt~E '-)Ot-UtlE':: E:( t'lcr)(f'IP:""
1. c- (;,
..I;...
3~'
EA'::.T8(tur~[:
104
(I
('J~ E,: E:DUt.j[!
6
(I
tWPT HE:DUt.JE'
S Ci iJT HEO UNCI
1 HR~I - F' I 1;'1-'-:-
_E~T
'58t.
40~5
LEFT TUF:t.~ CHEU<
t .J = ~ - ~ E: CI Lit J [I
~,OUT HE: CIU~ ~ [.,
E~':,T BC: ~y..~[,
1..'.,1 ~ 1::,T E: D Ur.J~}
CAF'AC 11,
~'iCi')H1Et,;:
. i "
.l. C'1.
I)
.: ::'
o
c
(;
It~PUT ',.'DLUtlE
."":,....,
c
~,~
H:' ,) U :.1" E [I I~.t [I i....
i c:, ~
,:-,-,
~, 7
..,10
,.',-1
[/,
NO
Of
o~:.
KEITH AND BCHNARB, P.A.
Engineers-Pia nner s- Surveyors
KEITH AND SCHNARS~ P.A.
C R I T I CA Lt.., 0',." Et'.1 Et...JT At-..JA L .~.-.. ::=; I .=.
1..0..1 I TH PPO._TECT
FEDERAL & OLD DIXIE
,J UI'JE 1 :;':=:.~.
**********************************
LE"-!EL C)F SER(..' ICE E:
SATUPAT I (ltJ 60
Cfd TICAL N/S VeIL 5 .:;:.-:;:.
C1': I TICAL E...ld 1,.'C)L 4 ::::: :2
CR I TICAL SUt'.l 1 0 :3 1
*************************************
LAt'IE
NORTHBOUND
'.'10'...1 VJ I DTH
.?
...
RT.
T. .
L. .
12. (I
12.0
12.0
~.
,:,
4
5
L
u
t-~ORTH80UND
LEFT
THRU
RIGHT
1$'1
1024
15
NORTH80Ut'..JD
SOUTHBOUND
EA~:TBOUt'ID
kIESTE:OUND
TRUCKS (~.,;)
1 (I
1 (I
1 (I
1 (I
PHASING N/S
E/'I.,..I
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
LANE GEmlETF"'(
t:OUTHE:OUt.JD EA:::,TE:OUIJ[,
t.'10') I/..II [lTH t.l0') I,.II ['TH
l.lE t,T E: CIUflD
tnlCl..' t,1 I ['Th
fn.
T. .
L. .
1.?O
1 2. (I
12. (I
1 :2. (I
12.0
F.:TL
F;TL
TRAFF Ie I)OLUt.1E:=:
SOUTHBOUI~D EASTBOUtlD
I...JESTBOUND
L
....'
:=:2E:
o
o
.:."?--:.
"-' ( ~
:.::
278
1 ;::: s;,
6
LOCAL BUSES (#/HR)
[I
o
o
o
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
1
1
1
1
:1. NEITHER
: 1. t'lEITHER
1 .
90 SEC:ONDS
TURt..J PF.:OTECTED
TURt.! PROTECTED
[I - 99 (HPEDS/HR)
CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
THRU -F.: I GHT
LEFT
t..JC)RTHBOUND
599
488
I f',JPUT ')OLur.1E
AD,JUSTED ")OL
CAPACITY
MOVEtnlEt'..JT
NOF.:THBOUND
191
488
5'7'
t~O
I.<JESTBCJUND
t:OUTHBOUND
540
o
EA::=,TBOUt.JD
4 ::':2
o
o
"-
'-'
LEFT TURt.'.l CHECI<
::=: I] UT H B [I UI..~ D
t.-
o
o
C) 1<
EA S T 8 D Ut.~ D
klE ::=:T8 0 Ut..j [)
o
(}
(:
32::=:
.-:./,,:.
~, ...-.
476
Oh
o~::
._-~~~.- --_.._----_.~_.-- -~----- -------.--..-.-----.....--
KEITH AND SCHNARS. P.A.
Engineers-Planners-Surveyors
APPENDIX C
U.S. 1 (FEDERAL HIGHHAY)
AT
SOUTHEAST 23RD AVENUE
KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A.
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
**..*****....FEDERAL HWl & SE 23 AVE - EXISTING.......*.....
198~1
****************************.*....
LE'-,iEL OF SERVl CE A
S~TURATIDN 42
CPITI CAL N/S 'JOL 559
CRITICAL E/W 'JOL 196
Cf;'IT! CAL SLlt'l 755
*....*....*******.**....****.***.**..
LAr~E
r~ORTH80UND
~1CO WI [iTH
..,
i:.
RT.
T. .
L. .
12.D
12.0
12.0
3
4
c:
..J
6
NORTHBOUND
LEFT
iHF'U
RIGHi
71
966
3
NORiHBOUtW
SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUN[)
TRUCKS (~n
10
10
1 (I
10
PHASING N/S
E/W
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
LANE GEm1ETRY
~.OUTH80UN[) EASTBOUN[J
~1D\) l,IJ DT H ~10\,' WI DT H
F:T.
Li.
12. (I
12.0
RTL
12.0
T RAFF I C ',JOLU~1ES
SOUTHBOUt~D EASTBOUND
12
708
171
120
3
96
LOCAL BUSES (~/HR)
o
(I
o
o
:1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED
:1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED
1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR)
90 SECONDS
CR IT I CAL LANE VOLU~1ES BY MO'v'H1ENT
THRU -RIGHT
LEFT
NORTHBOlltK'
559
o
nlF' liT I,) 0 L Ut1 E
ADJU;:;TED IJOL
CAPACIT'r
HO'JEMENT
NORTHBOUND
71
(I
57
Of<
SOUTHBOUND
502
(I
LEFT TURN CHEU
SOUTHBOUND
12
o
o
OK
EASTBOUND
1ge.
o
EASTBOUND
120
88
190
01<
WE~.TBDLIND
MO',J WI [l'j H
RTL
12.0
WEST80UN[J
o
3
3
PEAI< HOUR FACTOR
1
1
1
1
WESTBOUND
6
o
4IESTBOUt~D
o
o
(I
OK
KEITH AND SCHNARR, P.A.
EngIne ers-PI anners-Surve yors
....::: E I T H At--J L:' S C Ht---JA F::=;, F' _ t--'t -
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSI_
FEDERAL & BE ~~ AVE
.JUt.JE 1 ~'8i,
t.--, I TH F'RO....JECT
*****~*~**************~****~***~+~
LE'v'EL OF SEF."..) ICE E:
~,ATUF.:AT I (It.J ..:;:. .~.
C R I TICAL t.J./S l.)OL "7 .:;:. ::2
CF; I T I CHL E./I...1 l)CIL :=: 4 .;:::.
CF;ITICAL :3Ur.1 1 1 :=:B
*************************~********~**
LAI'4E
NDRTHE:CrUN[..
MOl) ~'JIDTH
~.
L.
PT.
T. .
L. .
12.0
12. (I
12.0
3
4
5
6
t,JORTHBOUtJD
LEFT
THRU
RIGHT
259
1037
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EA::::TBOUND
WESTBOUND
TPUCKS (%)
1 (I
10
10
10
PHASING N/S
E/I,J
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
3
LAt,JE GEOt."ETR'
~;OUT HE:Dur..j[) EA~,T E:DUt..J['
t.lI)l) I.AJ I [..TH t.lO'.) 1.'.1 I [,TH
PT.
LT.
12.0
1':;' n
fHL
12.0
TF.:AFF I C '.)OLUt'1E:;:;
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
12
774
1 71
120
:3
272
LOCAL BUSES (#/HP)
o
o
(I
o
: 2. HEAl) I E:=;T
: 1. NEITHER
1 .
90 SECONDS
TURt.J PROTECTED
TURt.J pF.:(nECTE[i
o - 99 (#PEDS/HR)
CRITICAL LAtJE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
THRU -RIGHT
LEFT
NORTHBOUND
600
252
It'4PUT VOLUI'1E
AD.JUSTED VCrL
CAPACITY
MO'v'E~.1ENT
NOFTHBOUND
259
252
60
hl/A
SOUTH8C)UtJD
540
(I
EA:;:.T80Ut.lD
346
o
LEFT TUF.'N CHECK
SOUTHBDU~--JD
EASTBOUtJD
120
44
.:::40
CW
12
(I
1 q.-::.
OK
(.JE ~;TE:CIUt Je.
t101..' 1J..1 I DTH
RTL
12.0
I;.IE~;T80ur...JD
o
~,
.'j
~.
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
1
1
1
1
I.,JESTBour J[.
.:::.
o
I,JESTBOUND
o
u
(I
C) r:':
KEITH AND SCHNARS. P.A.
E ngi neer s- P I a nner s-S ur v ey ars
APPENDIX D
OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY
AT
SOUTHEAST 36TH AVENUE
(GULFSTREM.1 ROAD)
KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A.
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
**uu*OLD DIXIE HWY &: SE 36 (GULFSTREAt1) - EXISTIN&*uuu
11/19/85
**********************************
LEVEL OF SERVICE A
SATURAT I ON 20
CRIT I CAL N/S VOL 7 1
CRITICAL E/W VOL 289
CRITI tAL SUM 360
*************************************
LANE
NORTHBOUND
MOV WI DTH
LANE GEOt1ETRY
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
WESTBOl.t~D
MOIJ WIDTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
RT L 1 2 . 0
RT L 1 2 . 0
RTL
12.0
RTL
12.0
. . " .
NORTHBO~D
TRAFFIC VOLlt1ES
SOUTHBO~~D EASTBOUND
WESTBOLND
LEFT
THRU
RIGHT
15
24
27
9
27
18
27
159
36
36
207
21
NORTHBO~D
SOUTHBO~D
EASTBOUND
WESTBO~D
TRUCKS (%)
10
10
10
10
LOCAL BUSES (~/HR)
o
o
o
o
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
1
1
1
1
PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TUffi~ PROTECTED
E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED
PEOESTRIAt~ ACTIVITY 1. o - 99 (MPEDS/HR)
CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS
CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
NORTHBO~D SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
THRU -RIGHT 71 57 242 289
LEFT 0 0 0 0
LEFT TURN CHECK
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOl.t~D WESTBOUND
INPUT VOLl.t1E 15 9 27 36
ADJUSTED VOL 16 9 29 39
CAPACITY 14 0 0 47
HOJEMENT NO NO NO OK
KEITH AND SCHNAJ:lS. P.A.
Engine e rs-Planner s-Surv e y ors
KEITH AND SCHNARS~ p_~_
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
OLC>
DI><I E
&';. -
-..:.:~:...
SE
:3 .-:E.. 0:: G U L F :=:;T~: EAt-,'l )
JUt,JE 19E:,::.
""'.1 ,.-/ F' R Cl.3
******************************~***
LPIEL OF ::::E~:I,.I I CE ~
::F.TUPAT I Ot.J :2 0
CPITICAL t~/:::: ','()L 75
CF: I TICAL E./I.<.I l)fJL :2 7 7
CRI TICAL '3Ut.l :::::: 5:2
************+.*+.+.+.+.+.+.+.**+.*+.*+.~+.*+.+.*+.**
LANE
NCI F:T H80UND
t'~10'..) VJ I DTH
F.TL
12. [I
':>
....
3
4
5
o
NORTHBOUND
LEFT
THRU
RIGHT
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EA~=;TBOUND
WESTBOUND
TRUCI<S C':)
10
10
10
10
PHASING N/S
E/lJ
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
15
24
-j -:
...t
LANE GEO~1ETPY
SOUTH80lliJD EAST80lN0
l1Cil) 1...11 DTH t101...' 1.1l [II H
1....IE::::TBOUtJD
1.1(Ii.' I,..j I [IT H
RTL
12.0
F.'TL
12.0
F'TL
12.0
TF:AFF Ie: '..)OLur.1E:=:;
SOUTH8C)Ut.jD EA:=::T80UI,JD
t.JESTBOUtJD
'7'
4?
1 :31
,-. ..
.,::.0
231
21
27
42
.=.:6
LOCAL BUSES (#./HR)
o
o
(I
(I
F'EA~: HOUR FACTOR
1
1
1
1
:1. NEITHER
:1. t'-.JEITHER
1 .
90 SECDND::::
TUF.:N F'ROTECTE[I
TURt.,J F'ROTECTEO
[I - 99 (#F'EDS/HR)
NDFnHBOUND
CR IT 1 CAL LANE VOLUr1E~=: BY' r'10')Et'.lEtn
IlJESTBOUt~D
THRU -RIGHT
LEFT
.,- .,-
__, --I
(I
If.JPUT I.)OLur'lE
AD,JUSTED l,)OL
CAPACIT\'
M 0') Et'l Eln
hlOF:THBOUt~D
15
(I
(I
Ok:
::::OUTHBOUt.jD
75
I]
EA'=::TE:our JD
2::::8
Ci
'~1"'7
..:..... (
[)
LEFT TUF:r.j CHEC~(
:30UTHE:OUf~D
E;::;:::,TE:CIUr ID
-'-i ,;.
o
i)
I..../E ST E:(WIJD
9
o
20
CW:
.-:.....
.......-,
I]
.-,,-,
.=... "7
(.If-;
O~':
KEITH AND SCHNARS. P.A.
Engineers-Planners-Surveyors
--------_..._._~_._.~.~-._-~~--~_._-_._--~_._~_._--_._--
SHARED PARKING STUDY
THE GROVE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A.
Engineers-Planners-Surveyors
6500 North Andrews Avenue
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33309-2132
June, 1986
Revised September 1986
Our Project Number 11824.01K
INTRODUCTION
This study addresses the parking needs of The Grove, a
shopping center in the City of Boynton Beach, Florida. Since
The Grove is made up of varying kinds of retail and a cinema,
it was felt that advantages could be realized by applying the
shared parking concept.
Many studies have been conducted which conclude that
combining land uses results in a demand for parking that is
less than the demand generated by separate free-standing
developments of similar size and character. This opportunity
is realized by two conditions:
l. Variations in peak accumulations associated
with different activity patterns (by hour, day,
season) .
2. Relationships among land use activities whereby
people are attracted to more than one land use
on a single trip.
The authoritative source in quantifying the interactions -
associated with shared parking phenonmenon is published by
the Urban Land Institute (ULI). It is a compilation of data
- 1 -
collected nationwide which describes the variations in
parking demands and the interaction of complimentary land
uses. The ULI methodology was used in this report.
Additionally, the formula required by Ordinance No. 86-8
of the City of Boynton Beach was calculated to ensure the
proper buffer was maintained.
The advantages of using the shared coricepts to reduce
the amount of parking required are many. To the developer,
not having to pave more parking lot than is necessary saves
money. To the City, a more pleasing center with less paved
and more landscaped areas results. And, to all, a more
accurate design providing only what is needed results.
..
- 2 -
BACKGROUND
The Grove is a retail center proposed for the northwest
corner of Federal Highway and Old Dixie Highway in the City
of Boynton Beach, Florida. Two maJor retail stores, or
anchors, are planned --- a Winn Dixie and a Scotty's Lumber
Store. Several general retail tenants will make up the addi-
tional square footage, and a cinema with six screens will be
provided. The details of the site are summarized as follows:
Anchor Retail - vh n IJ Dixie 46,351 so. ft.
- Scotty's Lumber Store 10,022 sq. ft.
Anchor Total 56,373 so. ft.
General Retail (including outparcels) 84,260 sa. ft.
Cinema -1,470 seats 22,000 sq. ft.
Total Site 16'2,.633 sq. ft.
The City of Boynton Beach Code requirements, taken
separately without consfdering shared parking interaction,
would result in the need for 1,071 parking spaces. Retail
reouirements are one parking space for each 200 souare feet
..
of space, and for the cinema, one space is required for every
four seats~ Therefore, the.requirements would be:
- 3 -
Anchor Retail - 56,373 sq. ft.
General Retail - 84,260 sq. ft.
Cinema - 1,470 seats
Total required by Code:
282 spaces
421 spaces-
368 spaces
1,071 spaces
Using the ULI methodology, however, allows a more
reasonable calculation of required parking.
- 4 -
ULI Methodology
The basis for the Urban Land Institute's research was to
define the characteristics of parking demands for single land
uses. Then, by analyzing parking accumulations at mixed use
centers, the shared parking concept was quantified.
The ULI recommends the following procedure be followed
in determining shared parking:
1. Initial Project Review: Knowledge of the site
and the intended land uses is very important in beginning the
shared parking analysis. Results from the initial review for
The Grove has been presented in earlier sections in terms of
square footage and land uses proposed.
2. Adjustment for Peak Parking Factor: The park-
ing factors are those specified in the City of Boynton Beach
Code as detailed earlier in this report and indicate a need
for 984 spaces.
3. Analysis of Hourly Accumulations: Parking
accumulation curves are selected by reviewing the ULI data
and incorporating site specific conditions.
4. Estimate of Shared Parking: The hourly parking
demand for each land use is merged to estimate overall shared
parking demand. This is simply the hour by hour addition of
parking demand for each use to estimate aggregate demand.
..
- 5 -
-.. "--,---,--_.__..__._-,.._........_---~-- ._._.-...._-------~._-------
THE ANALYSIS
Apply ing the ULI methodology to The Grove yielded the
hourly parking accumulation curves for each of the three land
uses for weekday and Saturday conditions.
Figure 1 - Anchor Retail Parking Accumulation
Weekday
Figure 2 - General Retail Parking Accumulation
Weekday
Figure 3 - Cinema Parking Accumulation - Weekday
Figure 4 - Anchor Retail Parking Accumulation
Saturday
Figure 5 - General Retail Parking Accumulation
Saturday
Figure 6 - Cinema Parking Accumulation - Saturday
The data for the ~nchor Retail is taken directly from
ULI. The data collected under their study parallels exactly
the kind of retail described herein as "Anchor Retail."
General Retail in The Grove is expected to be made up of:
small stores. A huge range of businesses could be tenants in
these General Retai 1 stores travel agents, card shops,
bookstores, office supplies, etc. These retail businesses do
- 6 -
ICO
'10
z
0
-
... eo
c
-'
::)
:E ,D
:)
(,)
(,)
C
.~ . Cd::>
!;
~
~ 2:J
C
IlL
~
C ~O
111
IlL J
I&.
0 ~O I
..
Z i
111 /
(,)
c 20
111
Q.
\0
C>
~
.~ ~ ~.. ~ ~ 8 ] ~ j ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
HOUR OF THE DAY
ANCHOR RETAIL
WEEK.DA Y
KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A.
ENGINEERS. PLANNERS. SURVEYORS
6500 NORTH ANDREWS A VENUE
FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA
(305) 776-1616
FIGURE 1
PROJECT: THE GROVE
PN: 11824.01K SHEET_OF
CALCULATED BY: D.... DATE: 8/88
CHECKED BY: FWS DATE: 8/88
ICO
Z
0
- CD
l-
e
~
:)
2 ED
::>>
(J
(J
e 70
CJ
z
-
~
c be
e
A.
~
e 50
ILl
Q.
U.
.0 40
..
Z
III
(J &J
~
III
'A.
'10
10
0
~. Cl~l~eB8(le 08B80
8 8 .~ ~ 8 c ~ 8, ,. , .. 9. ~ -- " ,. ~
~ - ~ . a ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ .C"- tS:l c:r ,.,... - ~ ... ... . .
HOURDFTHE DAY
GENERAL.RET AIL
. WEEKDAY
FIGURE 2
KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A.
ENGINEERS. PLANNERS. SURVEYORS
6500 NORTH ANDREWS A VENUE
FT. LAUDERDALE. FLORIDA
(305) 776-1616
PROJECT: THE GROVE
PN: 11824.01K SHEET_OF
CALCULATED BY: DJ". DATE: ./88
CHECKED BY: FWS DATE: 8/88
\ ex>
5 'io
-
~
c
-' 80
:>>
:E
:)
U
U 70
C
~
z 60
.-
~
a:
c
A.
~ '29
c
W
A.
1L 40
0
~
z ~
w
U
GC
W
A. '2.0
10
0
~ ~
.<J ... . \\.. .. 9
B 8~ 8 8 B 8 8 B ~ a ~ B e 8. B ~ 8 p
. .. q .. t :..:. N -."'-\ N\ "q UI \S r--- ~ ~ () - t'J
~ I'- ~... a-. - - m .... ~ - -
HOUR OF .THE DAY
CINEMA
WEEKDAY
FIGURE 3
KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A.
ENGINEERS, PLANNERS. SURVEYORS
6500 NORTH ANDREWS A VENUE
FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA
(305) 776-1616
PROJECT: THE GROVE
PN: 11824.01K SHEET_OF
CALCULATED BY: DJII DATE: a,a8
CHECKED BY: FWS DATE: a188
. Ice
"0
z
2
~
c 80
-'
:)
::E
:) ,'0
U
U
C
,~ bO
z
-
~
a:
c 5"0
A-
~
C
J&,I 40
A-
IL
0
..~ 30
Z
J&,I
u
15 2.0
A-
ID
0
~ 2~. -
88~88888~ij~a~~BS~e~
.'n -- .' -' D .:.:. N :...:..~ ('(l ~ Ul --.9 r- t() cr- (J = ~
~ t:--c;:()<.r ....-. ., .
-HOUR. OF THE DAY
ANCHOR RET AI'L
..SATURDA Y
FIGURE 4
KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A.
ENGINEERS, PLANNERS. SURVEYORS
6500 NORTH ANDREWS A VENUE
FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA
(305) 776-1616
PROJECT: THE GROYE
PN: "824.01K SHEET_OF
CALCULA TED BY: Dol.. DATE: a/aa
CHECKED BY: FWS DATE: &/88
~ b 8 g 828. ~ 8 ~ $ e ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~!l
" ,. ii . ~.:.:.. N :.:.~ \'fI ~ l!) ~ r- ((l cr- 9 ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ... - ~ . .
'HOUR' OF THE DAY
GENERAL RETAIL
...SA TURDAY
. . .
FIGURE 5
KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A.
ENGINEERS, PLANNERS. SURVEYORS
6500 NORTH ANDREWS A VENUE
FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA
(305) 776-1616
PROJECT: THE GROVE
PN: 11824.01K SHEET_OF
CALCULA TED BY: DJII DATE: 8/ee
CHECKED BY: FWS DA TE: 8,ee
,co
z CiO
52
...
c
... 80
:)
:E
:)
U
U 70
C
CJ
z too
-
:lIl:
G:
C
A.
:lIl: r==,O
C
IU
CL do
'11.
0
...
z 30
III
U
C
1&1 tD
A-
It)
0
.~ . 0 -2~8~88888()e88
8 8 ~ 8 Q 8 <8 ... .' . . '. . . .. ~ .. . . .
... . .' '. (J .. ~ -. \"l t'(l ~ Ul '-9 f" ~ cr- ~
\Slr.-\;\JC;:S-~=~
~~
- ~
- -
HOUR OF THE DAY
CINEMA
SATURDAY,
FIGURE 8
KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A.
ENGINEERS. PLANNERS. SURVEYORS
6500 NORTH ANDREWS A VENUE
FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA
(305) 776-1616
PROJECT: THE GROVE
PN: 11824.01K SHEET_OF
CALCULA TED BY: DJM DA TE: a/8a
CHECKED BY: FWS DATE: a/88
not exhibit the same parking characteristics as the ULI data,
or the Anchor Retai 1 found at The Grove. These businesses
tend to close sooner in the day and, to a large extent, to
capture customers from the neighboring anchor retail. There-
fore, the parking accumulation curves reflect this close
relationship of the General Retail with other parts of the
site.
The cinema exhibits parking activities quite different
than either of the retail uses. Guided by the ULI data, con-
servative estimates of parking accumulation were used. It
was assumed that weekday matinees would be offered and
patroni zed. Furthermore, it was assumed that each weekday
evening would be a sellout at each of the six screens.
Although this would be economically desirable to the operator
of the cinema, it will not happen very often. These
assumptions have been used to present the worst case and to
provide enough parking during these times.
Seasonal variations are addressed in the ULI report, and
the City of Boynton Beach Ordinance. In each case, the vari-~
ations would tend to decrease the parking demands during the
off-season.
- 13 -
-
Because the ULI data has been collected nationwide,
seasonal variations do not describe experiences in South
Florida.
It is assumed in this report that the peak season
for the anchor retail, general retail and cinema all occur at
the same time, and that no shared parking benefit can be
derived from the relation of different peak seasons.
Once
again, this assumption serves to present the worst case, and
supply the most parking.
Percentages for the parking accumulation curves have
been applied to peak hour demand for parking in each land use
to arrive at calculation of shared parking values.
Table 1
shows the total parking demand for weekdays, and Table 2 for
Saturdays.
- 14 -
TABLE 1
WEEKDAY PARKING ACCUMULATION
Time Anchor Retail Cinema Total
6:00 a. m. 0 0 0 0
7:00 23 34 0 57
8:00 51 76 0 127
9:00 118 84 0 202
10:00 192 126 0 318
11:00 245 168 0 413
12:00 noon 274 253 55 582
1:00 p.m. 282 253 92 627
2:00 274 253 129 656
3:00 268 244 147 659
4:00 245 223 221 689
5:00 223 211 258 692 **
6:00 231 126 294 651
7:00 251 84 331 666
8:00 245 42 368 655
9:00 172 34 368 574
10:00 90 25 368 483
11:00. 37 0 294 331
12:00 mid. 0 0 258 258
**
Weekday peak hour
- 15 -
TABLE 2
SATURDAY PARKING ACCUMULATION
Time Anchor Retail Cinema Total
6:00 a.m. 0 0 0 0
7:00 8 13 0 21
8:00 28 42 0 70
9:00 85 126 0 211
10:00 127 189 0 316
11:00 206 202 0 408
12:00 noon 240 232 110 582
1:00 p.m. 268 253 184 705
2:00 @ ~ 258 772 **
3:00 282 223 258 763
4:00 254 211 258 720
5:00 212 168 258 638
6:00 183 84 294 561
7:00 169 55 331 555
8:00 155 29 368 552
9:00 113 8 368 489
..
10:00 107 0 368 475
1l:00- 37 0 294 331
12:00 mid. 0 0 258 258
** Saturday peak hour
- 16 -
CONCLUSIONS
Weekday shared parking demands peak at 5:00 in the
afternoon. Both the retail uses are active, and the cinema
matinees are near their peak. The peak demand from the ULI
methodology is 689 spaces.
Saturdays exhibit similar characteristIcs, but the
cinema is more active, resulting in a peak hour demand at
2:00 p.m. of 772 spaces.
Since a grea ter aggrega te peak hour dema nd occurs on
Saturday, it will be used for design purposes.
It may be prudent to allow for a safety factor of ten
percent (10%) above the ULI calculations to provide for
natural turnover of parking and unexpected fluctuating peaks.
If this was provided at The Grove, 849 spaces would be
supplied.
Since the current site plan allows for 931 spaces, there
is a very comfortable cushion of twenty percent (20%)
provided.
..
- 17 -
_.
ORDINANCE NO. 86-8
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
Using the formula specified in Ordinance 86-8, a buffer
of at least ten percent (10%) needs to be provided "to ensure
a sufficient number of parking spaces are available at times
of peak hour use."
Buffer = surplus shared parking
on-site + shared parking provided
For The Grove:
Buffer = 49 x 100% = 13%
228 + 140
This is further supported below:
Ro = retail needs by Ordinance
Ru = retail needs by ULI
Ra = retail available = Ro - Ru
Co = cinema needs by Ordinance
Total = provided on-site
At The Grove:
Total = 931 parking spaces
Ro = 703
Ru = 514 {/>..JtJ
Co = 368
..
- 18 -
The following calculations apply:
Ra = Ro - Ru
= 703 - 514 = 189
On-site = Total - Ro
= 931 - 703 = 228
Shared Parking Provided =
C '- On-site = SPP
o
= 368 - 228 = 140
Surplus Shared Parking
=
Ra - SPP = Sur
= 189 - 140 = 49
S, Buffer
= 49 x 100% = 13%
228 + 140
Therefore, sufficient buffer exists to satisfy the City
of Boynton Beach shared parking ordinance.
..
- 19 -
3^mm 3H~
I ~ i J
I i ~ ~
U!
r :i_
.:J :;
.......- ~:;
~ .~i
'r\-;'. -t'" ""~~; {;
N\,'d l:l3M3S ON\' l:l3~ \' M
~,
i2
~ Ot-
;g
z J >0:
~~
i ~ ~~
~ ~u
::~
u:
0:.,
0..
.."
"'''
~!! , i ---f.
, ;:(~ I
'. 1/,-...-
, " iL-:::_
. ; ,~I ~ .
. .:.: 'J . .
r , ; t
f
91
!c ~ CI~
~...~il!;o
~C)(cz>
~~~~S~
~8~~~~
Ol-~S!O"
..,.. %~2
fo~-,!~f
1&Ia::I&lCi~D
~!l::lo~r
.. ....;:g:z:5
~ e::~~~:
r !f-~zwwlDll!
- "'--co c
,. UK!j2it-'.
I!!I ~~o:e~~;
Zwl&lcOW~
g 8~~i:;t~1
--
--
.----..
---~
~Oj."HJ.otJ
. \-l9V36 .1
YCI~O" '8 3\-\
3^Ol:\ .
, -
-'
'O,.N...,,~~~~.~~H 'S"n
--....,--2_.~ - - - . .--- c:=::=
. h\~;
. - :h~.
.- "-1. \\ l...."i'
./ :t;.';\ -1!",
. ,-.U~. ,i:'i:
~ l~\\~~ l~h~
. l'~lo.. :,,_:!
l!hl~ ~;n~
1 !-l\. '0"-0
. ~i'l\~ lW0. '
\!\.~. l'~:"-
i;i\'i ,\~~~o
~-!;h i,",.,..
1- -~:! ;~i~.
t ~h,;~, ;;;~,~:
- '!i.ai!\ 1.h'b_
a:. ...\ 1, .. 'i~~;c
0._ ocl '~i",
(j) . !-\ili.1 ~ ~;r.t''1
U1 ~. ;'1 It _..
o I 4i'it\" ;~~~'
-, ~.:! '. ~,:."~
-- '-!~t-. <~~.
..: :1 "112'. ".0.
\" Li'hhl1 f. "
. U1 h--
\~
\
..
~"
u,
';a,
~10 '
~
':~
..."./;
'''''~lf'''';..
.,..~~
:..;,~,~_,z~.:;:.:~~. .~:(-:.:f,,~~~~r';i~~~~t:~. ."~;.:;:::;~ttr:-~r.'"~'fN;!.:;i.~..... ... _I .. _ ..
-~---------'''''''''---'--'''''' "'--~ ._-~--"_..-_.~"-_.._......_.,._-
-.-- "'--""-.-" --_._....
.- -.....-.. ..... ..-..-.... -. _.... ...' ,- .. ,....,
- .~..__..... ..- --.....-.. -.-. _.....
--- ..."'........."'.,-.- ...-.-- ......
.._---.~..._.... '-.-_.....,.-.......-...-.~
....-......-. ....,-..--.--..--..........
-~........._.-...-..,-...._... .....-.
.. .. _ _~ ,_ _'..0- ......... _"'~ __.._
.-...........,--.....-... ....... .~_.~......._"
. ._........~....-.....,..-_...._..'"-....,
VOI"O'" . k:)..,. "'OJ"A"'.
3^OI:l~ 3Hl
t-.r- _l_'_-";~ _ ,_)
I. ;Ir-J!
~ . I
~ r: :
'-r--- :. [' -(..)
11,) i - . i ~ . - _:)
. 1 "- .~__1!
- J i
I
,
j
;. .
'r
Il~_,
. 0----
/'
If
, '~
\ 'I . I ~
\ 4>--~
\' ir-
": ;J..i==J.
!:==- !
. -t=.!
!ri=~
1'1 i
I ! -- j
. I .f, - ~
Ii
,
i
i
[I
II
z
o
i=
<
>
w
-'
W
0-
'"
-<
w
~~
z~
, .
iF .. i
.:r ~. )"'7';-. ~=~;I
I: t, v. . - ',j I
; ~ \ 1 . .:~: . i
.~. I. i; 1 I!
I' 11 -
)c...''----c7-T-~-'r
II I / ',7
~ I: ; ~
1 r i L _ ~ '\ I
\:: j r i~-:- jll
l' I ,I . I /-1
(,"~ li-,.< It ~
.;;, ,r--::
l' Ie: i
'\ - Ii I
\ ~ /'- 'C -.
: \ ~- ;;~ II: -- I i
\ II ..1 I tJ :" II~Ji
.' I t ~ -t.~ ',;,
t- I ll~ '.J~' ~ /i. [j'~
" 'I I \.J. f- ' : .,,\,. '1..W~i):... f.... - j ;
I ~1 s f tl!~r":t:L,
I ! u.i f,' ~,t ',.-- -i
j' ~~+ ';r-,
:1 -:=~I.' ~ ii I. I
'I l ~ i - r ~, ,-' ~-1
j~-_I ~! !.. _''-,. '~I
,......, ~ I.' - ~
~~ .l- Ui: 'r-'-
~-_i . =1 v -- -
F'.;~:.. L'- ~ I /![E'~~.'
'"I t ~-f" I
~-..J.' , . ,
r -
! It~ I
I,
~
)
l~
,.
==t
.-:-;1
--:
(--'=' -,
i f
l ~
[.;
,\1
II
l ~ -
1 i: -
-----.ll...
".'
1;(
t
i
~
9
'"'
<'
i;7
;
Ii
I
i
I
YOltl01J ' "-:'''18 H01H,f,OI
-",.: . ,.-" .. -.: . .
3AOCl8 3Hl
G
i -
j .;_1
I .>_~.I
! , Jl=!
L__ '
i=1
I
.""
. I
; ~!
: ~ h
!~I
j~1
1:-
r"-'
1--- ~
.r-- 1
=1
<f'-l
-lr-1r-- I
'---i
(f~ : " '::j' <<'
1(1 i ,1<_ '. '
\\~;.J i,''''--'
I ",
, .~
:I-j
, .,
1" ~~l 1l_
Ilf-' ",
I <t
~_.
r~
1.--.
f-.....
;. I-
N: "'~
t f.
fc-
i
I
I
k.,...
j
(<>
~
r<,
, ,
J-.~I
. j
. fl1~1'
. I
~.:-I
!
I
I
i
'I
I
i
I
II
,
J ;~
~.... '. ~"
\ I
I Ir
~ if -';
~~)! :i~r--
~ j -I I
I "<< l..
~ 'I
/,
I
. . . . ,j i: I 1 I
: 4,' ,
...
, r ~ <-.' :., ct
t~~"~0 en;
I
!t=:J:
<Q
z
o
~
5
>I
UI,
...l
W
:r
I-i
::J
o
~
.J
<
;::;,
~,
Ilj.
i'
f
I
<
...-'------.--..--~-.-'-_______.L.______.__
'1,1.-I~, . j
r II r'
i I:
" I
. r ~
'.t
:1
<Z
,
~ I
;1 ~-
.'
,f!
if 1
, ~ I
!~~r'
~p :
~~f' Of
r l~; ,
I ;: I ("
~ '
z!
3
<
~
~
, [
~
I
c~
I
~
----..~_ _._..,J;~.llllll."" " '-"I ....__.._~~.._--r__~, ._
LAC A TION MAP~
BOYNTON BEACH SHOPPING CENTER
t1~1
I - ..
D :.....1.. --..,j
J,C'
~~
t-
,
\
u
.1
o
1/8
1/4
MILES
II
800 FE~T
PLA ~
II # r R~ r
/
/
o 400