The URL can be used to link to this page

REVIEW COMMENTS 7.C.3 STORAGE BUILDING (AL PICA) MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 99-005 SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION January 7, 1999 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Project Name: Storage Building Property Owner: Al Pica Applicant/Agent: Al Pica Location: Lots #105, #106 and #107, Arden Park, or southwest corner of Railroad Avenue and N.E. 8th Avenue (see Exhibit "A" - Location Map). File No.: MSPM 98-005 Land Use: Industrial (I) Zoning: M-l Type of Use: Warehouse No. of Bays: N/A Square Footage: Site Area: 22,265 square feet (.51 acre); Building Area: 2,400 square feet (existing); 5,820 square feet (proposed) 8,320 square feet (total) Adjacent land uses and zoning: North South - Right-of-way for N.E. 8th Avenue, and farther north, McAlpines Towing and auto repair uses zoned M -1 ; - A 10 foot wide alley, and farther south, an unidentified commercial or industrial building zoned M-l; - Rights-of-way for Railroad Avenue and the F.E.C. Railroad. - A 10 foot wide alley, and farther west, a multiple bay building with auto repair, marine service/repair and other small commercial uses zoned C-4 East West Site Characteristics: The subject property is partially built, with a 2,400 square foot warehouse building on approximately one-third of the property. The remainder of the lot is currently used for open storage of vehicles which is screened with slatted fencing and varied mature tree species. As a substitute for sod, the open areas on the property are covered with stone. No sidewalks border the property, nor exist in the vicinity, which may be used as justification by the applicant for requesting a sidewalk waiver. Proposal: The owner is proposing to erect two additional warehouse (Quonset hut) buildings on the remainder of the property, each totaling 2,960 square feet, and required I Storage Building Memorandum No< PZ 99-005 Page 2 parking for warehouse uses (see Exhibit "B" - proposed site plan). The proposal also includes improvements relative to parking, landscaping, drainage and removal of outdoor storage which will all contribute toward upgrading the site to current codes. Concurrency: a. Traffic- As a condition of approval, the Planning and Zoning Division requires written confirmation from the county that the project will meet level of service standards and conform to the county's traffic performance standards ordinance. b. Drainage - Conceptual drainage information was provided for the city's review, including confirmation from a certified engineer that the project's drainage will conform to portions of city code. The city's concurrency ordinance requires drainage certification at time of site plan approval. The Engineering Division is recommending that the review of specific drainage solutions be deferred to time of permit review when the required technical information will be submitted. Driveways: Proposed access consists of two, 20 foot wide driveways from Railroad Avenue. The northern driveway will serve only the proposed northern building, whereas the southern driveway will access the parking areas serving both the existing warehouse and proposed southern building. Parking: According to the parking ratio of one space per 800 square feet of warehouse area, the combined existing and proposed buildings require 11 spaces. The proposed plan includes 11 parking spaces including one accessible space. The plan does currently meet the parking requirements as stated in the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2 - Zoning and ADA requirements for this use. Following the meeting of all conditions, the site will conform to all parking area and related regulations. It should be noted that the site is designed to accommodate parking spaces according to a relatively low ratio/requirement. The site would not accommodate office uses, manufacturing or other commercial uses as said uses would require greater parking requirements than are proposed on site. Landscaping: The landscaping of the site will fully meet the code requirements when staff comments are incorporated. The development will be provided with the required amount of perimeter and internal landscaping as required in the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 7.5 Article II. Staff also recommends that the stone groundcover be replaced with sod (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). Building and Site: Building and site regulations will fully meet code when staff comments are incorporated into the permit drawings. Community Design: The proposed project consists of two metal buildings comprised of corrugated metal sheeting shaped in a parabolic arch to form a continuous roof. The planned "Quonset" huts, being similar to traditional hanger-like buildings, has sliding bay doors at both ends. The buildings will be white on the front and left as exposed metal on the remaining sides. The predominant building color and material in the immediate vicinity are white and concrete block. Although the existing and proposed Quanset buildings are unique to the immediate area, the condition of thew ~ Storage Building Memorandum No< PZ 99-005 Page 3 adjacent buildings are marginal to poor, therefore, if the subject buildings and site are properly maintained, they could potentially represent an improvement to the immediate area from which subsequent property improvements could be motivated and compared. Signage: The project includes no proposed signage. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Division recommends that this request for site plan approval be approved, subject to the comments included in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval. Staff also recommends that the deficiencies identified in this exhibit be corrected on the set of plans submitted for building permits. MWR xc: Central File Attachments \ \CH\MAIN\SHRDA T A \Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\Storage Building - Pica \Site plan staff report Storage Bldg . doc j LC~ATION MAo EXHIBIT J AL PICA STORAGE BUILDING , '":r h=11-V,CTI .1 I r: I Tn '--:- ---;': ,ii r:;' "111"'1\ ( , L ~ ,~-r ,.., I -' J.-\ I " 1_, ... ~~ - . ,tJ :'~" lfl:: 'i, :~,' >- ~ ~ - ~, ' ' Er C\ .:.\:: :: { )__.. i' ~ c!- ~ f.~ ~ ~ --~~S,r ~ ,'i"TTr ,." . 0'(~:~~' ':' :\- l L- T. -tt~. -l lit 1~ ~ ' Tn ~ E~/;' " I _.L. ,,' 'I" :',, 'ii'" -1 ;:- ~,-.-- , r 1 ' '~, + '~k ~ jl' r-'\ ~: !,f I r?' \1 \\ r.:;,,~,: -,. I ,n' . ,j'" 1-'- ~",,-,,- ' ~~ ~ l: I-f' \\.1',:, I ~ ~ ';:. 1'1' I.... ; t.!:"3 /---,~:3 ~"_ : I ill I I_~ ~ ;!!!,- - ~ . I- ~-~'j~..-,< ><: H" 'IIi" __ L--- .,- .-~ \-~ 1 I :1 i- ~~ \ '\ ~T: l-~ 'l- \-+-- ' ..- '-- ,~;_>.{"\ 1'']-4- , ,... he ~~. I ~ ,..- -''''' ~- >--..~.. . '-- . I: fJ _ L-- -:~.:'- ~ ;u:: ::''''' '-- · ~., iCaf I 'I -, =. , -...;c' ~ ?...--- L: f- D' -, "'i""'- ~ If :' " '- _ ......:.. >-- ~, ~ '_r f-- I: ,~I=t\ IT-'-1 i=!= '- ~ ' ~ ! I Tl'n", = iIU'--' ,~= t-.r"---.... ~ f-. . ~ I I , " = t: C:3 r I: - "" _ '" ~ ~ ~'-- ! ' : , r-- '- " · _ '1. r _ ' : fA: -... 'A .- " \ I iTT ". L cc..<r._.....,.~~- I J \J" ,.....~ ,,' _ ,-,: ' I , 1 I I .,...-t , , 'IT ::-;l ,- ,',: . '..-- , 'i,., /JQYN.1?WCi1iHIL- -.J E I,.LJ rr I Tj '\ ! \" I lIT I' ,. ~ i L "" ,.., tT PU _ ~ffiEJIlar~:l,EP1J: _ ;.:. ~l- . " ,"". T. .,~' . .,' .'''"' , .omv-' r ...ili " ; I. 1\ F--: ..,'''~ ~'''''''';,J \ j ;",", I' \ ' ,IT I I .\:. \ 1 1 \ J i ~ ..L., 1 r ..... i.~: ., """ ' _ . " " 1\ ......' I >;u:=l - ' ~ ]ill ~""" ,,", : 'T II ,liT 7 rl 1 1I1I1 ,r II ...~..- f'" DID '" ~ ~~..'" 1rl1' I.'" ; L! i , ' r--:= ~ I I: I I ! \ ~ - .-J t::::::T""" 1 1 . i T \. ' ~ 1ill:l l.J 0 H t-f \ ! " ",T Ie .. ~ 11. IV," tJ = ,1>--1 IOl.l t= '! Ii. [.i L-\ . ,;-: _,... to _ ~ Hili _, 'ii~, :11 1= ; :11 ! ~:'I' Ft"' -:::..- =n i-~~' - ~~JI ,....I ~-l11 ( 11 ~I= Iii L;--,\';Vf U:' '~'1' ,- t=l:!, ' , -= ~ a ~ =9\1 II' />fi" >- ~ ~' :J~t=~l;oh< CI~ t::~~~ .... ,-r ~ 0:: 7--'" -n TI " llPt- '- ' , i : 5J ~1'''2 "~ ~f~ll V TT IT!1 lJ ,11= ~ f=" e~ :TJ1":1' i1 I . = =-', t= -= ql=J ~.". I 1 , 6' IF ..':>_0 _ ~ _' _' "c 1'"-,, ~[r:: ,i"?~~~S ~-- ifII ~~:T :j! .. ~ 1-~1\.\ ) AT~ ~ C - _. I, I + '; t= >= -. "'" ,;Mt.~ i'" . dl:~'-~ ~ 0 -("~ I t=- >= \:::; .;-ro LJII'!iii; U . VI ,_ Ii : 11"1 .,i \, 'Ii' '\ .' ~ c;en-. . ,.... .",... ~...,~ r~ll - -- I " I - - I H, ,< ,'! '[1, : ,I rr-"'J1!."" ~.-.-l --[n \ TOT I\~BEAC./H ta~ l ~ 1 ; I ,I 'I' .' I - :...0 l' :, t ;:r ",lLi -ulft II. " II"~ ~i';IIIiI':'II" ~:":II:~~~ ',,;", ~/~:~. ,'.. ..~~ "0 AOO,'800 F~ET ,I ., ,.'F .:JiiIHG' ~ UI LiO - ...- . ",L~" ~,"-.-l- '~"1 -,- ~... ", - 'Ii :-~~ ~"r ~rc.--- .---- .- == : R3 =- </ <: I , :/ , I ;j :' /1 "'~< ~ ~ z ~ o III ... o .. I- U III ~ t :; .., l- e ~ o Q ~ o OJ : ,{ " " ~~ ~-- 1 MIL . EXHIBJT B ~ ~ . " ~~Sf D < ~~~~ 0 <"~~ }:l .. ~ \l ,~f ~ 5 . 1'" -A.1l '-f,d L ;!l -a~ . -r: . ~: 1: 'f l' 1\ ~!. Ae."W& . ., i -.l r . " ~~ ~ (). ~ ~ ; ~ 7' f; f ~t =*1 /'I J~. r r ,.~c ~ ~ ~ r ..: ~t~\ z~~ ~f~ lfi -1 f1l II I ) Z -;'- o \ I] '-- fIr () ?V lC 7Ii ~ \ I I \ I ~ I VI l! ~ I 11 I , r< >< r 7- f ~ j. ~ I \ ~ ~~ oS~ -\2.0 ,.......a.'t.... llIr'\-..a<.oeLI -.. -, ~ I ...... "'~ -~''"'C;-J ( ^'t{1 - I \y 'V. ~ UJ ~ l -!~\r ~II:\II . l .~. IU' I REMOVABLE METAL BUILDING AL PICA 817 RAILROAD AVENUE BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 375 7051 33435 s EARL H MARTIN e. ASSOCIATION 2939 SOUTH HAVERHILL WEST PALM BEAGH. FL 732 ..59 334:5 96~ 99<45 ~ ~~ It E .. ~ ~ Ie- : ~.~ /, --_____._..____.._...... _..P. __,__ __._~ ,._. _~~~'_____~_._ EXHIBIT "e" Conditions of Approval Project name: Storage Building File number: MSPM 98-005 Reference: The plans consist of 5 sheets identified as 2nd Review. Maior Site Plan Modification. File # MSPM 98-005 with a Januarv 5 1999 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking . DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS Comments: 1. If waste generated exceeds capacity of small containers, including those used by automated system, a dumpster must be accommodated. UTILITIES Comments: 2. All utilities easements shall be shown on the rectified landscaping drawings so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. LDR Sec. 7.5-18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 3. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1500 g.p.m. as stated in LDR Chap. 6, Art. , Sec. 16, or the requirement imposed by Insurance underwriters, whichever IS greater. (See Sec. 26-16(a)). 4. Comp Plan policy 3C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may, therefore, not be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available. 5. Provide an engineer's written certification that drainage will conform with all rules of the City and the South Florida Water Management District. (LDR Chap. 4, Sec. 7F) 6. The waste stream from any proposed or future manufacturing process must meet the City's pretreatment requirements. Sampling point(s) must be provided to allow monitoring of this waste stream. (Sec. 26-143, 26- 147) If manufacturing will not be conducted on the premises, please provide a statement to that effect, signed by the owner, in order to eliminate the need for a sampling point(s). FIRE Comments: 7. Provide fire flow calculations. LDR Ch. 6, Sec. 16. (p Page 2 Storage Building File No.: MSPM 98-005 :8~~ ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT POLICE Comments: None ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 8. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the city's code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following: site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies, such as FDOT, PBC, SFWMD, DERM, L WDD, DEP and any others, shall be included with your permit request. 9. Provide an Engineer's certification in writing that drainage will conform with all rules, regulations, codes, etc. including, but not limited to, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 of the Land Development Regulations of the City of Boynton Beach. [LDR Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2.] 10. Provide a signed and sealed survey of existing site characteristics. [LDR Chapter 4, Section 7.A.] 11. Provide a 5 foot concrete sidewalk along Railroad A venue and a 4 foot sidewalk along NE 8th Avenue. Show the sidewalk through the driveways or request and receive waiver of sidewalk requirement. [LDR Chapter 6, Article III, Section 11. & LDR Chapter 6, Article IV, Section IO.T.] 12. All plans are to be signed and sealed by design professionals. 13. The open areas between and behind the buildings shall be sodded and irrigated. [LDR Chapter 4, Section 8.A. and Chapter 6, Art. IV, Sec. 5(B)(I)( c).] 14. Show the parking areas (striping, dimensions, traffic control devices, etc.) on the drainage plan. Also add a general note that the parking areas shall conform to City Standard Drawing B-9800 1. IS. Provide concrete or paved flumes from the edge of pavement into the swale areas to assure that sod will not impede water flow into the swale areas in the future. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 16. Section 10.1 of Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan of the Land Development Regulations requires that signage be reviewed at time of _7 Page 3 Storage Building File No.: MSPM 98-005 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT site plan review. Considering the submittal does not include drawings of the proposed signage, add a note to the site plan stating that "Site signage will not be provided" or note that "Site signage is not approved and separate site plan review will be required for signage." 17. Section 10.1 of Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan of the Land Development Regulations requires that signage be reviewed at time of site plan review. Considering the submittal does not include drawings of the proposed signage, add a note to the elevation view drawings of the buildings stating that "Building signage will not be provided" or note that "Building signage is not approved and separate site plan review will be required for signage." 18. Specify, in tabular form, on the working drawing of the site plan and/or floor plans the use of each building, gross floor area of each building, type of construction and occupancy classification. Working drawings of the buildings shall comply with the codes specified in Chapter 20 of the Land Development Regulations. 19. Indicate on the site plan within the floor area of the existing building the proposed use of structure. 20. Identify on the site plan within the floor area of both new buildings the proposed finish floor elevation. The minimum finish floor elevation shall not be less than 6" above the sidewalk or the crown of the adjacent roads. 21. Add to the site plan a labeled symbol that represents the location and path of the accessible route that is required from the accessible parking space to the accessible entrance of each building/tenant space. Identify the width of the route and provide sufficient data that will verify the transition from the elevation of the accessible parking space to the finish floor of the building is in compliance with the Accessibility Code for Building Construction. Where applicable, identify the width, slope and length of ramps that are designed for accessibility and, where applicable, show and identify the location of handrails including providing detail drawings depicting height, shape and location. Where applicable, show, dimension and label the location of all landings that area required at the top and bottom of each ramp. Place a note on the site plan drawing indicating that the accessible route from the accessible parking spaces to the accessible entrance of each building and/or tenant spaces is in compliance with the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section 4.3, Accessible Route and Section 4.6, Parking and Passenger Loading Zones] 22. At time of permit review submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. 23. Compliance with the building codes will be evaluated at time of permit 8 Page 4 Storage Building File No.: MSPM 98-005 DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT review. The permit fee, water and sewer facility fees, county fees and state fees will be determined at time of permit review. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: None FORESTERlENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: 24. Indicate on the landscape plans any existing trees that must be preserved, relocated, or removed and replaced on the site (Tree Preservation ordinance). If nonexistent, indicate accordingly on the plan. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 25. Increase southern landscape buffer to two and one-half feet from two feet. 26. Indicate within the tabular data on the site plan the type of uses (existing and proposed broken down), and square footage. 27. If it is anticipated that proposed uses will not require the receipt or distribution by vehicle of materials or merchandise, provide a note on site plan indicating same and that no specified loading/unloading space necessary. 28. Identify (label) all trees shown on the landscape plan. 29. Hedge must also consist of at minimum, 50% native species; replace ficus hedge with native alternative. 30. Confirmation that proposed project conforms to adopted traffic standards and the county traffic performance standards ordinance. ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS 31. To be determined. ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS 32. To be determined. /bme s:\projects\cond of appr\ q DEVELOPME~ ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISS~N OF THE CII I OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDj." PROJECT NAME: Storage Building APPLICANT'S AGENT: AI Pica APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: 2301 SE 4th Street, Apt. 1, Boynton Beach, FL 33435 DATE OF CITY COMMISSION RATIFICATION: January 19,1999 TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Major Site Plan Modification LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 817 N. Railroad Avenue DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO. X THIS MATTER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above. The City Commission hereby adopts the findings and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board, which Board found as follows: OR THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows: 1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations. 2. The Applicant ~HAS HAS NOT established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested. 3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth on Exhibit "C" with notation "Included". 4. The Applicant's application for relief is hereby ~ GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof. DENIED 5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk. 6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of this order. 7. Other DATED: City Clerk J:\SHRDATA\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Atlas Party Rental\DEVELOPMENT ORDERdoc /0 APPLICATION TRACKING LOG PROJECT TITLE: Storage Building - Pica FILE I: NWSP 98-023 PROJECT LOCATION: 817 N. Railroad Ave. TYPE OF APPLICATION: New Site Plan PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED: (YIN) 0 REVIEWER'S NAME AGENT: AI Pica ADDRESS: AGENT PHONE: 737-5030 FAX: DATE REC'D: 11/23/98 AMOUNT: RECEIPT NO.: 12 SETS OF PRE-ASSEMBLED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW: 2 OF 12 SETS SIGNED AND SEALED 0 SURVEY 0 LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 FLOOR PLAN 0 SITE PLAN WITH SITE DATA 0 APPLICATION/SUBMITTAL: DATE ACCEPTED: DRAINAGE PLAN ELEVATION VIEW DRAWINGS COLORED ELEVATIONS RECEIVED MATERIAL SAMPLES RECEIVED PHOTOGRAPHS RECEIVED o o o o o DATE DENIED: DATE OF LETTER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES: DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER: I INITIAL 1 ST REVIEW MEMO: DATE SENT: I MEMO NO. 98-324 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED I RETURN DATE: 12/14/98 UTIL. P.W. PARKS FIRE POLICE PLANNING BLDG ENGR FORESTER MEMOI DATE DATE OF LETTER SENT TO SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS: 90 DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID: DATE 12 COMPLETE (ASSEMBLED) SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2ND REVIEW: PRE.ASSEMBLED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW: AMENDED APPLICATION 0 2 OF12 SETS SIGNED AND SEALED 0 SURVEY 0 LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 FLOOR PLAN 0 SITE PLAN WITH SITE DATA 0 2ND REVIEW MEMO: DATE SENT: DRAINAGE PLAN ELEVATION VIEW DRAWINGS COLORED ELEVATIONS RECEIVED MATERIAL SAMPLES RECEIVED TRANSPARENCY RECEIVED PHOTOGRAPHS RECEIVED MEMO NO. o o o o o o RETURN DATE: 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANS MEMOI DATE PLANS MEMOI DATE UTIL. 0 '19-t:1ab , /51r,tIJ PLANNING 0 P.W. 0 ' I BLDG 0 L:fti~ 00 k1 ilL/- PARKS 0 ENGR 0 FIRE 0 FORESTER 0 POLICE 0 BOARD MEETING DATE: BOARD: LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS PLACED AT THE PROPERTY. DATE SENT / SIGNS INSTALLED: DATE: CITY COMMISSION: DATE: DEVELOPMENT ORDER RECEIVED FROM CITY CLERK: 0 DATE: DEVELOPMENT ORDER SENT TO APPLICANT: 0 DATE: S:\FORMS\TRACKING LOG FORM revised 4/25/97 cn I OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM Mike Rumpf TO: DATE: SUBJECT: REFERENCES: ENCLOSURES: FROM: Ofc. Riggle 12/03/98 Storage Building PZ 98-324 I have the following comment in reference to this project; 1. Show handicap access routes from parking to all buildings FILE: NWSP 98-023 DEe '3 1998 PLANNING AND ZONING OEPT. LEISURE SERVICES: PARKS DIVISION MEMORANDUM RE: Michael Rumpf, Planning & Zoning Manager John Wildner, Parks superintendentf Storage Building (AI Pica) TO: FROM: DATE: December 4, 1998 The Leisure Services Department Parks Division has received the site plan for Storage Building (AI Pica). There are no recreation-related comments< The plan may continue through the normal review process< JW:ad t, rDl.. ;- ~j"~_.- rn~. W__~, rn..~ 1 1,<, ., I I , " ! DEC4~7_J! I FIRE & LIFE SAFETY DIVISION Memorandum No. 98-416 :~ ~ NFPA Life Safety Code 101, National Fire Code 1, all applicable National Fire Protection Association codes, and the City Fire code shall be adhered to. FROM: Mike Rumpf, Act. Director Planning & Zoning Division Steve Gale, Fire Marshal ~ Deputy Chief - Fire Rescue o;p~ent ~r..~-~ r ;, DEe L~.~ l'> n ~ fm' a::;l \~ TO: ._'>v.......""..,. DATE: December 4, 1998 SUBJECT: Storage Building 817 N. Railroad Ave. NWSP 98-023 The fire hydrant location is not shown on the plan and we need the fire flow calculations. LOR Ch. 6, Sec. 16. The Fire Rescue Department does not approve of these plans and they should not be forwarded at this time. CC: File ill UJ U \YI ffi ~ DEe I . IE RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. TO: Mike Rumpf, Acting Director of Planning and Zoning Kevin John Hallahan, ForesterlEnvironmentalist ;<:3 T Storage Building (AI Pica) New Site Plan - 1st review FROM: Re: DATE: December 14, 1998 The applicant should indicate on the landscape plans if there are any existing trees that must be preserved, relocated, or removed and replaced on the site< The project should continue in the normal review process. Kjh File DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. BD 98-240 ill DEe I 4 98 ill rn@rnowrn PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. TO: Michael Rumpf, Acting Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael E. Haag, Building Code Permit Administrato'1~ December 14, 1998 U FROM: DATE: RE: Storage Building (AI Pica) - New Site Plan (NWSP 98-023) 1 st review comments We have reviewed the subject plans and offer the following comments that should be addressed prior to the project being forwarded for Board review: BuUdinl! Division (site snecific and nermit comments) - Michael E Haag (561) 742-6352 1. Provide detail drawings of the site and building signage or place the following note on the site plan and elevation view drawing of the buildings: Site and building signage is not approved for this project. Separate site plan review and approval is required for site and building signage. Drawings of the signage shall comply with the applicable regulations specified in the Sign Code. [Chapter 21 of the Land Development Regulations] 2. The assumed property line between the buildings is 5<5'; therefore, the walls adjacent to the assumed property line shall comply with the regulations specified in Table 600 of the Standard Building Code. Provide documentation on the plan that the walls adjacent to the assumed property line comply with the regulations of the building code. 3. Indicate on the site plan within the floor area of each building the use that is proposed for each structure. 4. Identify on the site plan within the floor area of both new buildings the proposed finish floor elevation< The minimum finish floor elevation shall not be less than 6" above the sidewalk or the crown of the adjacent roads. 5. Add to the site plan a labeled symbol that represents the location and path of the accessible route that is required from the accessible parking space to the accessible entrance of each building/tenant space. Identify the width of the route and provide sufficient data that will verify the transition from the elevation of the accessible parking space to the finish floor of the building is in compliance with the Accessibility Code for Building Construction< Where applicable, identify the width, slope and length of ramps that are designed for accessibility and, where applicable, show and identify the location of handrails including providing detail drawings depicting height, shape and location. Where applicable, show, dimension and label the location of all landings that are required at the top and bottom of each ramp. Place a note on the site plan drawing indicating that the accessible route is in compliance with the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. [Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section 4.3, Accessible Route and Section 4.6, Parking and Passenger Loading Zones] Development Department Memo No. BD 98-240 to Michael Rumpf RE: Storage Building (AI Pica) December 14, 1998 Page Two 6< Add to the Building Data section of sheet 1 of3 the proposed use of each building. 7. At time of permit submittal, submit a copy of a recorded unity of title that unifies lots 105, 106 and 107 as one lot Find attached a copy of a City approved Unity of Title form. 8. At time of permit submittal, signed and sealed plans will be required. 9< Compliance with the building codes will be evaluated at time of permit review. The permit fee, water and sewer facility fees, county fees and state fees will be determined at time of permit review. :MEH:bg Attachment XC: Bulent I. Kastarlak J:\SHRDAT A\Development\Building-6870\Documents\TRC\NWSP 98-023 1st review Storage Building (AI Pica).doc o! N.,.O _~' ..1-- , . . ~(p .. I .l~: -r ~,.,~-o ; :;.., '</ .;-.~ Y. DE:l?.AR.-rMB~ OF DE:VE:LOl?ME:~ :SU:J ..DING DI"VISIC UNITY OF TITLE In consideration of the issuance of a permit to for the construction of in the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, the Undersigned hereby agrees to restrict the use of Lot(s) , Block(s) , Subdivision or property being otherwise described by metes and bounds, addressed as follows: , in the following manner: 1. Said property shall be considered as one plot and parcel of land, and that no portion of said plot and parcel of land shall be sold, transferred, devised or assigned separately, except in its entirety as one plot or parcel of land. 2. The Undersigned further agrees that this condition, restriction and limitation shall be deemed a covenant running with the land, and shall remain in full force and effect, and be binding upon the undersigned, their heirs and assigns. Release of this Unity of Title must be approved by the administrative head of the Boynton Beach Department of Development and ratified by the City Commission. 3. The Undersigned further agrees to record this instrument in the Public Records of Palm Beach County at his (her) expense. Signed, sealed, executed and acknowledged on this Boynton Beach, Florida. day of , 19 , at Owner(s) Witnesses (2) STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PALM BEACH The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this (date) by , who'is personally known to me or who has produced (type of identification) as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. (SEAL) Signature of person taking acknowledgement Name of officer taking acknowledgement--typed, printed or stamped Title or rank Serial number, if any A:UNITYTTL. WP5 Rev< 3/92, 1/23/96 - WVH:bg DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. ENG 98-157 DATE: Michael Rumpf, Acting Planning and Zoning Administrator Raymond F. Davidson, r.E., City Eng~ December 14, 1998 iW~mJLLUJ ._W~ ~ I I DEe t 5 1998 ~ I . L~_.--.__...J pu,r;>i'NG i1.r~D ~,9]JJ)]J!EPT. TO: FROM: RE: STORAGE BUILDING (AL PICA) - NEW SITE PLAN (NWSP 98-023) 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS We have reviewed the subject plans and otTer the following comments that should be addressed prior to the project being forwarded for Board review: Em!:ineerin2 Division (Site Specific Comments) - Sebastian Puda & Ken Hall 56 I -742-6280 1 < All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the city's code requirements at time of application< These permits include, but are not limited to the following: site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies, such as FDOT, PBC, SFWMD, DERM, LWOD, DEP and any others, shall be included with your permit request. 2< Provide an Engineer's certification in writing that drainage will conform with all rules, regulations, codes, etc< including, but not limited to, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 of the Land Development Regulations of the City of Boynton Beach< [LDR Chapter 4, Section 7T2.] 3< Provide traffic control devices (e<g. stop bars, stop signs, one-way, do not enter, etc.) at all applicable locations< [LDR Chapter 4, Section 7<B.2.] 4< Provide proposed locations of site lighting on plans. [LDR Chapter 4, Section 7<BA] 5< Provide a signed & sealed survey of existing site characteristics. [LDR Chapter 4, Section 7.A.] 6< Provide a 5' concrete sidewalk along Railroad Avenue and a 4' sidewalk along NE 8th Avenue< Show the sidewalk through the driveways< [LDR Chapter 6, Article 111, Section 11. & LOR Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 10<T] 7< All plans are to be signed and sealed by design professionals< 8< Provide drainage calculations per LDR Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5<A.] 9< The open areas between and behind the buildings shall be sodded and irrigated< [LOR Chapter 4, Section 8<A.] 10< Show the parking areas (striping, dimensions, traffic control devices, etc<) on the drainage plan. Also add a general note that the parking areas shall conform to City Standard Drawing 8-9800 I. Department of Development Memorandum No< ENG 98-157 Re: Storage Building (AI Pica) - New Site Plan Is1 Review Comments December 14, 1998 Page Two 11 < The Site Drainage Plan should be revised to provide additional information such as swale cross sections and the location of an outfall structure with proposed connection to existing storm drainage system< Also, some of the proposed grades along the east side of the site should be revised to direct stormwater to the proposed swales. 12< Provide concrete or paved flumes from the edge of pavement into the swale areas to assure that sod will not impede water flow into the swale areas in the future < SP/KH:ck XC: Bulent Kastarlak Sebastian Puda Ken Hall (':'l\ly Documents'Storage Building (AI Pica) New Site Plan I sl Review.doc MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 98 - 335 rn mow m 001 DEe , 5 1998 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. TO: Mike Rumpf, Acting Planning Director FROM: John A. Guidry, Utilities Director DATE: December 15, 1998 SUBJECT: 817 N. Railroad Avenue - New Site Plan 1st Review We offer the following comments on this project: GENERAL COMMENTS 1) All utilities easements shall be shown on the rectified landscaping drawings so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. LDR Sec. 7.5-18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 2) Dept. of Health permits may be required for the water system extension serving this project. (Sec. 26-12) 3) Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1500 g.p.m. as stated in LDR chap. 6, Art. , Sec. 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater. (see Sec. 26-16(a)). Please submit these calculations with your Health Department permit application and plans. 4) Comp Plan policy 3C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may, therefore, not be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available. 5) Provide an engineer's written certification that drainage will conform with all rules of the City and the South Florida Water Management District. (LDR Chap. 4, sec. 7F) SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1) Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all existing or proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in Sec. 26-33(a) of the Code. 2) This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the certificate of occupancy. 3) LDR chap. 6, Article IV, Sec. 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. 4) Appropriate backflow preventers will be required on the domestic water service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in accordance with Sec. 26-207. 5) A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this office has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to serve the project. (Sec. 26-15) 6) A scaled drawing showing the site drainage plan shall be submitted. (LDR Chap. 4, sec. 7F) 7) The waste stream from the manufacturing process must meet the City's pretreatment requirements. A sampling point must be provided to allow monitoring of this waste stream. (Sec. 26-143, 26-147) Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella (375-6404) of this office. JAG/PVM Xc: Skip Milor Peter Mazzella File MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 98 - 335 TO: ~ike Rumpf, Acting Planning Director FROM:~. Guidry, Utilities Director DATE: December 15, 1998 SUBJECT: 817 N. Railroad Avenue - New Site Plan pI Review rnLO~t I R p, i.f ~~~ rn .. ____J . L We offer the following comments on this project: GENERAL COMMENTS 1) All utilities easements shall be shown on the rectified landscaping drawings so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. LDR Sec. 7.5-18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 2) Dept. of Health permits may be required for the water system extension serving this project. (Sec. 26-12) 3) Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1500 g.p.m. as stated in LDR chap. 6, Art. , Sec. 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater. (see Sec. 26-16(a)). Please submit these calculations with your Health Department permit application and plans. 4) Comp Plan policy 3C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may, therefore, not be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available. 5) Provide an engineer's written certification that drainage will conform with all rules of the City and the South Florida Water Management District. (LDR Chap. 4, sec. 7F) SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1) Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all existing or proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in Sec. 26-33(a) of the Code. 2) This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the certificate of occupancy. 3) LDR chap. 6, Article IV, Sec. 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. 4) Appropriate backflow preventers will be required on the domestic water service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in accordance with Sec. 26-207. 5) A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this office has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to serve the project. (Sec. 26-15) 6) A scaled drawing showing the site drainage plan shall be submitted. (LDR Chap. 4, sec. 7F) 7) The waste stream from the manufacturing process must meet the City's pretreatment requirements. A sampling point must be provided to allow monitoring of this waste stream. (Sec. 26-143, 26-147) Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella (375-6404) of this office. JAG/PVM Xc: Skip Milor Peter Mazzella File DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. BD 99-006 '\D)I ~ @ ~ U W ~ ~1 1\1\1 .. 5lS99 I~ - PLANNINGEApNTD ZONING 0 . TO: Michael Rumpf, Acting Planning and Zoning Administrator M Michael E. Haag, Building Code Permit Administrat~.&.' \J January 4, 1998 FROM: DATE: RE: Storage Building (AI Pica) - New Site Plan (NWSP 98-023) 2nd review comments No plans were submitted for second review. Therefore, the below listed comments shall be addressed and plans submitted for staff review before the project is forwarded for Board review: Buildin2 Division (site soecific and oermit comments) 1. Section 10< I of Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan of the Land Development Regulations requires that signage be reviewed at time of site plan review Considering the submittal does not include drawings of the proposed signage, add a note to the site plan stating that "Site signage will not be provided" or note that "Site signage is not approved and separate site plan review will be required for signage." 2< Section 10. I of Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan of the Land Development Regulations requires that signage be reviewed at time of site plan review. Considering the submittal does not include drawings of the proposed signage, add a note to the elevation view drawings of the buildings stating that "Building signage will not be provided" or note that "Building signage is not approved and separate site plan review will be required for signage." 3. At time of permit review, specify, in tabular form, on the working drawing of the site plan and/or floor plans the use of each building, gross floor area of each building, type of construction and occupancy classification. Working drawings of the buildings shall comply with the codes specified in Chapter 20 of the Land Development Regulations< 4. Indicate on the site plan within the floor area of the existing building the proposed use of structure < 5. Identify on the site plan within the floor area of both new buildings the proposed fmish floor elevation. The minimum finish floor elevation shall not be less than 6" above the sidewalk or the crown of the adjacent roads. Department of Development Memo No. BD 99-006 to Michael Rumpf RE: Storage Building (AI Pica) January 4, 1999 Page Two 6< Add to the site plan a labeled symbol that represents the location and path of the accessible route that is required from the accessible parking space to the accessible entrance of each building/tenant space. Identify the width of the route and provide sufficient data that will verify the transition from the elevation of the accessible parking space to the finish floor of the building is in compliance with the Accessibility Code for Building Construction< Where applicable, identify the width, slope and length of ramps that are designed for accessibility and, where applicable, show and identify the location of handrails including providing detail drawings depicting height, shape and location. Where applicable, show, dimension and label the location of all landings that are required at the top and bottom of each ramp< Place a note on the site plan drawing indicating that the accessible route from the accessible parking spaces to the accessible entrance of each building and/or tenant spaces is in compliance with the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. [Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section 4<3, Accessible Route and Section 4.6, Parking and Passenger Loading Zones] 7. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. 8. Compliance with the building codes will be evaluated at time of permit review. The permit fee, water and sewer facility fees, county fees and state fees will be determined at time of permit review. l\.1EH:bg XC: Bulent 1 Kastarlak: J:\SHRDAT A\Development\Building-6870\Documents\TRC\NWSP 98-023 2nd review Storage Building (AI Pica). doc MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 99 - 006 m ~@rnnwrn ill ~ 5/999 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. TO: Mike Rumpf, Acting Planning Director FROM: John A. Guidry, Utilities Director DATE: January 5, 1999 SUBJECT: 817 N. Railroad Avenue - New Site Plan 2nd Review We offer the following comments on this project: GENERAL COMMENTS 1) All utilities easements shall be shown on the rectified landscaping drawings so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. LD R Sec. 7.5-18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 2) Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1500 g.p.m. as stated in LDR chap. 6, Art. , Sec. 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater. (see Sec. 26-16(a)). 3) Comp Plan policy 3C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may, therefore, not be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available. 4) Provide an engineer's written certification that drainage will conform with all rules of the City and the South Florida Water Management District. (LDR Chap. 4, sec. 7F) SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1) The waste stream from any proposed or future manufacturing process must meet the City's pretreatment requirements. Sampling point(s) must be provided to allow monitoring of this waste stream. (Sec. 26-143, 26-147) If manufacturing will not be conducted on the premises, please provide a statement to that effect, signed by the owner, in order to eliminate the need for a sampling point(s). Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella (375-6404) of this office. JAG/PVM Xc: Skip Milor Peter Mazzella File MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 99 - 006 DATE: Mike Rumpf, Acting Planning Dir~" / John A. Guidry, Utilities Director ~ V~ January 5, 1999 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: 817 N. Railroad Avenue - New Site Plan 2nd Review We offer the following comments on this project: GENERAL COMMENTS 1) All utilities easements shall be shown on the rectified landscaping drawings so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. LDR Sec. 7.5-18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 2) Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1500 g.p.m. as stated in LDR chap. 6, Art. , Sec. 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greateL (see Sec. 26-16(a)). 3) Comp Plan policy 3C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may, therefore, not be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available. 4) Provide an engineer's written certification that drainage will conform with all rules of the City and the South Florida Water Management District. (LOR Chap. 4, sec. 7F) SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1) The waste stream from any proposed or future manufacturing process must meet the City's pretreatment requirements. Sampling point(s) must be provided to allow monitoring of this waste stream. (Sec. 26-143, 26-147) If manufacturing will not be conducted on the premises, please provide a statement to that effect, signed by the owner, in order to eliminate the need for a sampling point(s). Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella (375-6404) of this office. JAG/PVM Xc: Skip Milor Peter Mazzella File ~--;': .JEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 98-324 TO: TRC MEMBERS Bulent Kastarlak, Director of Development Bob Borden, Assistant Fire Marshal Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Ofc. Robert Riggle, Police Department Pete Mazzella, Utilities Department Michael Haag, Building Division Ken Hall, Engineering Division AI Kim, Public Works Department John Wildner, Parks Division Ray Davidson, Acting City Engineer Bob Donovan, Permit Application Group . ;o/q.e.- Michael W. Rumpf Acting Planning and Zoning Manager FROM: DATE: November 25, 1998 RE: SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES 1 ST Review - New Site Plan Project - Storage Building (AI Pica) Location - 817 N. Railroad Avenue Agent! Owner AI Pica File No. Permit No. - NWSP 98-023 98-5080 Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Please review the plans and exhibits and transmit formal written comments to me no later than 5:00 P.M. on December 14 1998. When preparing your comments, please separate them into two categories; code deficiencies with code sections referenced and recommendations that you believe will enhance the project. Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval: 1. Use the review standards specified in Part IV, Land Development Regulations, Site Plan Review and the applicable code sections of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments. 2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete, however, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the reviewer by contacting Michael Rumpf. 3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the - Page 2 Development Department Memo PZ 98-324 Storage Building (AI Pica) TO: TRC Members documents. 4. Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with other departmental improvements. 5. When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review specified. 6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memorandum, within the time frame stated above, to me. The memorandum shall state that the plans are approved and that they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and that they recommend the project be forwarded through the approval process. All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted to me for distribution to the applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memorandum. Michael Rumpf will be the Planning and Zoning staff member coordinating the review of the project. First review comments will be transmitted to the applicant along with a list of Technical Review Committee (TRC) members. The applicant will contact TRC member(s) to clarify comments. Amended sets of plans will be submitted prior to, or brought to the TRC meeting. Amended plans and outstanding comments will be reviewed at the TRC meeting to confirm that the project is ready to move forward to the Planning and Development Board meeting. MWR: bme Attachment XC: William Bingham, Fire Chief Marshall Gage, Police Chief John Guidry, Utilities Director Don Johnson, Building Division Sebastian Puda, Engineering Division Larry Roberts, Public Works Director Central File s: \Projects\Storage Building -Pica\NWSP\1S1review-plans