Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS MINUTES OF THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING HELD IN COMMISSION CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 26, 1999 AT 7:00 P.M. PRESENT Lee Wische, Chairman James Reed, Vice Chairman J. Stanley Dube Pat Frazier Mike Friedland Steve Myott Frances Cleary, Voting Alternate William Sherman, Alternate Michael Rumpf, Acting Planning & Zoning Director Mike Cirullo, Acting Assistant City Attorney ABSENT Maurice Rosenstock 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chairman Wische called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, 2. INTRODUCTION OF COMMISSIONERS AND BOARD MEMBERS Chairman Wische introduced the Board Members, Acting Assistant City Attorney, Mike Cirullo, Mike Rumpf, Acting Director of Planning and Zoning and the Recording Secretary. 3. AGENDA APPROVAL Chairman Wische asked for a rT)otion to approve the Agenda. Motion Mr. Dube moved to approve the agenda. Vice Chair Reed seconded the motion. Motion unanimously carried. -.--.----- -~-----_.-- --- MEETING MINUTES PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 26, 1999 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion Mr. Dube moved to approve the minutes of the January 12, 1999 meeting, Motion seconded by Mr. Friedland. Motion unanimously carried. 5. COMMUNICATIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS A. Planning and Zoning Report 1. Final disposition of Planning and Development Board meeting agenda items by the City Commission at their meeting of January 19, 1999. (a) Grove Plaza Master Plan was approved; (b) The Melear PUD Modification was approved; (c) Gateway Professional Site Plan was approved; (d) The Atlas Party Rental Site Plan was approved; (e) Storage Building Site Plan (the Quonset Huts) was approved; (f ) The 7 -Eleven Site Plan was also approved with changes and conditions as follows: . Item 23, regarding the school comments on alcohol sales before a certain time. was omitted; . Item 14 will allow the pumps to be installed when the road-widening project is let, rather than when the project was completed; and . Item 13 was not approved. The Commission wanted further restrictions on the striping that is placed around the perimeter of the canopy. An agreement could not be reached and the applicant recommended that everything except this Item be approved, conditioned upon the applicant returning with a certain design for canopy signage striping. (g) Lake Worth Christian School Conditional Use Application for expansion was approved; and (h) The Peter Browne Abandonment was approved. 2 MEETING MINUTES PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 26, 1999 Chairman Wische stated that the Board was under the impression that the City Ordinance would not allow pumps to be installed until the road was completed. Mr. Rumpf stated that the definition of a status of a project according to County Concurrency Regulations, which provides for this, was used. Chairman Wische stated one of the key reasons the Planning and Development Board denied the project was that the Board assumed that the pumps could not be installed. Mr. Rumpf said that in accordance with the strict definition of the Zoning Code the use would not be allowed, but the installation of the pumps was considered using the County Concurrency system. Mr. Dubs inquired if there was much discussion on the Quonset Hut item. Mr. Rumpf said there was a great deal of discussion and debate by the Commission. Mr, Rumpf said there was much support for the applicant from the audience and there was a petition presented to the Commission that favored the project as an improvement to the neighborhood. Mr. Friedland inquired about the sale of alcohol at the 7-Eleven, which is located across the street from a school, which will also sells cigarettes and other questionable reading material commonly sold at these types of businesses. Mr. Rumpf stated that issue was discussed since it was a condition of approval from the School Board. The Commission felt it was not equitable to restrict that use to one location since within a mile or less, the same sales take place at other establishments. 6. OLD BUSINESSS None Chairman Wische stated that anyone in the audience that wished to speak on any item before the Board must be sworn in. Chairman Wische instructed Acting Assistant City Attorney Cirullo to swear in all persons who would be testifying. 7. NEW BUSINESS Abandonment 1. PROJECT NAME: AGENT/OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Manatee Bay fka Banyan Cove Jan C. Hansen, Olen Development Company 1632 North Federal Highway Request approval for abandonment of a special purpose easement and utility easement recorded for a previously proposed subdivision that was not developed. 3 MEETING MINUTES PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 26,1999 Chairman Wische noted that the microphones were not working and requested that the Board members speak clearly in order to be heard. Chairman Wische requested that the applicant take the podium. Jon Hansen of the Olen Development Company took the podium on behalf of the applicant. Chairman Wische noted there was only one staff comment and cited the comment to the agent. Mr. Hansen stated that they agree to the one condition and that as of today they have secured a consent from FP&L. There are no other utilities within the easement. Mr. Hansen stated that the easement was developed at the same time as the plat for the property and that the plat was subsequently abandoned. Therefore, the easement never had any purpose once the plat was abandoned. Chairman Wische asked if there were any additional comments. Mr. Rumpf stated there were none. Chairman announced the public hearing portion of the meeting. Hearing none, closed the public hearing. Motion Mr. Dube moved to approve the request for abandonment of a special purpose easement and utility easement recorded for a previously proposed subdivision that was not developed for Manatee Bay fka Banyan Cove, subject to all staff conditions. Motion seconded by Mr. Myatt. Motion carried 7-0. B. SUBDIVISION Master Plan Modification 1. PROJECT: AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Boynton Commerce Center Kevin Donahue Dalfan American Corporation 1800 Corporate Drive Request for approval to modify the approved master plan to expand building "A" by 8,400 square feet and reduce buildings "B" and "C" each by 4,200 square feet. 4 MEETING MINUTES PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 26,1999 Mr. Kevin Donahue, 800 SW 14lh Drive, Boca Raton, Florida took the podium. Chairman Wische said there were 22 staff comments and requested the agent only address those comments he does not agree with or needs clarification. Mr, Donahue stated they agree to all staff comments. Chairman announced the public hearing portion of the meeting. Hearing none, closed the public hearing. Chairman Wische asked if staff had any additional comments. There were none. Motion Vice Chair Reed moved for approval to modify the approved master plan for Boynton Commerce Center to expand building "A" by 8,400 square feet and reduce buildings "B" and "c" each by 4,200 square feet, subject to all staff comments. Mr. Dube seconded the motion. Motion carried 7-0. C. SITE PLANS Major Site Plan Modification 1. PROJECT: AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: The Wreck Restaurant Robert Currie Robert Katz 502 E. Ocean Avenue Request for approval to adapt an existing commercial building into a 6,191 square foot, two-story restaurant. Robert Currie took the podium and stated he was the architect of the project. Chairman Wische stated there were 37 staff comments and asked if there were any comments the agent wished to address. Mr. Currie stated that all staff comments have been addressed and he has no comments. Chairman Wische inquired if the applicant obtained approval from the EPA. Mr. Currie stated they did not. Chairman Wische thought the building location had once been used for chemicals and/or pest control. Mr. Currie stated he did not know. Mr, Rumpf stated that this building was formerly known as the Bean Building and had once been occupied by exterminators and did not think that EPA approval was a 5 MEETING MINUTES PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 26,1999 requirement. Chairman Wische requested that if EPA approval was necessary, staff should work this out with the applicant. Ms, Frazier inquired when the restaurant anticipates opening. Mr. Currie stated that it would be approximately one year before the restaurant opens. Mr. Myott inquired if the owner were going to purchase additional parking spaces or if some type of arrangement has been set up for parking. Mr. Rumpf stated that the Code allows for some type of agreement for parking and staff is recommending that this project be deferred to the shared parking comprehensive analysis that is going to take place in the downtown area. Mr. Rumpf stated this shared parking has to work in order to encourage continued downtown development. This use, as well as any other uses, would utilize the shared-parking program. Mr. Myott asked when staff would stop accepting the no parking requirement. Mr. Rumpf said that there is a comprehensive program that would be completed by a consultant. The City has already received the proposals and there are only two to select from and both are acceptable. The comprehensive study should be completed within four to six months. Mr. Rumpf stated that the needs for this project will be incorporated in the study. Ms. Cleary asked where parking would be for the restaurant. Mr. Rumpf said there is a public lot with 21 spaces next door and there is on street parking. Mr. Rumpf stated there is a mixture of uses downtown and there is the assumption that there will be shared parking, as well as foot traffic. Mr. Dube said that although there was not enough parking, it is important that these projects proceed for the downtown area. Mr. Rumpf noted what is currently happening in Delray Beach regarding parking problems that had not been planned for. Mr. Rumpf said that the comprehensive planned study would place Boynton Beach ahead of the situation. Mr. Myott said his comments were not negative and thinks it is a wonderful project that should go forward. Chairman Wische announced the public hearing portion of the meeting. Hearing none, closed the public hearing. 6 _.._-----~----- ._----------_._'- MEETING MINUTES PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 26,1999 Motion Mr. Friedland moved to approve the request to adapt an existing commercial building into a 6,191 square foot, two-story restaurant at 502 E. Ocean Avenue, subject to staff comments and also with agreements if required from the EPA, the State or the Federal government due to past usage. Motion seconded by Mr. Dube. Motion carried 7-0. New Site Plan 2. PROJECT: AGENT: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Collier Commercial Scott D. Oler 409 NE 3R Street Request for approval to construct 49,704 10.760 square feet of office/warehouse space in three buildings on 1.14 acres. Mr. Scott Dyer, 7522 Briar Cliff Circle, Lake Worth, Florida took the podium. Chairman Wische noted there were 26 staff comments and asked the agent if he wished to address any of the comments. Mr. Dyer stated they agreed to all staff comments. Mr. Dyer noted that there was a typographical error and they are only constructing 10,760 square feet, not 49,704 square feet, which is the square footage for the entire site area. Chairman Wische announced the public hearing portion of the meeting. Hearing none, closed the public hearing. Chairman Wische asked if there were any additional staff comments. There were none, Motion Mr. Dube moved to approve the request to construct 10,760 square feet of officel warehouse space in three buildings on 1.14 acres for Collier Commercial at 409 NE 3rd Street, subject to all staff comments. Motion seconded by Mr. Myott. Motion carried 7-0. 8. OTHER None 7 MEETING MINUTES PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 26,1999 9. COMMENTS BY MEMBERS Chairman Wische informed the Board that he spoke with Mr. Rumpf last week regarding the March 9th meeting which falls on Election Day and that several members will be involved with the elections that day. Chairman Wische requested that the meeting be changed to another date. After discussion, it was determined that the meeting date for the first meeting in March be changed to Monday, March 8,1999. Mr. Dube said he received a phone call from the owner of ACT III and questioned why she was not allowed to have a sign on the wall, which faces Federal Highway. Chairman Wische noted that the Wreck Restaurant will have a wall sign. Mr, Dube stated that the sign actually would be above the roof and the shop is in need of some kind of identification. 10. ADJOURNMENT Motion Mr. Dube moved that the meeting adjourn. Motion seconded by Ms. Cleary. The meeting properly adjourned at 7:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, . ../{~,;,la;'- A )/lu. .,,~___ Barbara M. Madden Recording Secretary (one tape) 8 ;L'Ss ue '/ .. Cet r; c....( C~ V""".<!:..Cc:.~ U- '- .-# - ~ -L. 7 /~ " 0/ eY)f~~' u:JIf7.1e'l~nrf tf (k )' I~ v/a-_</y ~nc:i2nyY?~V1. 7Z/\ pr~c--ss~ 10 C01f"rh1 1 st REVIEW COMMENTS '0'0--5 ~ 1(('1/1\ Project name: Collier Commercial File number: NWSP 98-019 Permit Number: 98-3128 Reference: The plans consist of 11 sheets identified as 1 st Review, New Site Plan. an October 20, 1998 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. File # NWSP 98-019 with DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS Comments: C[) The dumpster enclosure at the above site should be 10' x 10' inside 1. measurement. The applicant must supply a detail drawing of the enclosure with the plans. UTILITIES Comments: G All utilities easements shall be shown on the rectified landscaping drawings so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. LDR Sec. 7.5-18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. V Dept. of Health permits may be required for the water and sewer system extensions serving this project. (Sec. 26-12) 0 Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1500 g.p.m. as stated in LDR chap. 6, Art., Sec. 16, or the requirement imposed by Insurance underwriters, whichever IS greater. (see Sec. 26-16(a)). Please submit these calculations with your Health Department permit application and plans. 0 Sec. 26-34(E) of the City Code requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon my request for signature on the Health Dept. application forms or within 30 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. ~ Comp Plan policy 3C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may, therefore, not be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available. V The plans submitted do not indicate how the proposed buildings will obtain water and sewer service from existing or proposed mains. They also do not include sufficient fire protection. All proposed water and sewer lines must be shown on the plans. Those water and sewer lines to Page 2 Collier Commercial File No.: NWSP 98-019 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all existing or proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in Sec. 26- 33(a) of the Code. @ This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the certificate of occupancy. / LDR chap. 6, Article IV, Sec. 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. 1/ Appropriate backflow preventers will be required on the domestic water service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in accordance with Sec. 26-207. @ A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this office has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to serve the project. (Sec. 26-15) @ The waste stream from any manufacturing process must meet the City's pretreatment requirements. A sampling point must be provided to allow monitoring of this waste stream. (Sec. 26-143,26-147) FIRE Comments: 1./ The Fire Department recommends that this project not be forwarded at . ~ this time. Water mains and hydrants are not shown on this plan. ~ The remotest part of any structure shall be no more than two hundred feet (200') from a hydrant. LDR Ch. 6, Sec. 16. The location of the project inset on the plan is not legible. POLICE Comrnents: V There is no loading zone for building 3. This building is equipped with 6 overhead doors which facilitates commercial traffic loading and storage. G( Handicap detail must meet code reference access area. Page 3 Collier Commercial File No.: NWSP 98-0 19 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Y. Mark areas in front of all overhead doors which are not loading zones as NO PARKING areas. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: ~ All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the city's code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: site lighting, pavmg, drainage, curbing, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies, such as FDOT, PBC, SFWMD, DERM, L WDD, DEP and any others, shall be included with your permit request. @ Show the proposed locations of lighting on the site plan and the landscape plan. [LDR, Chap. 4, Sec. 7B4; Chap. 7.5, Art. III, Sec. 8A7c and Chap. 23, Art. IIA] / Provide a dumpster detail showing a minirnum clear opening of 10 feet. [LDR, Chap. 7.5, Art. II, Sec. 5J] 1D Add a general note to the paving and drainage plan that all striping, signage and markings shall be in accordance with City Standard Drawing B-90012 and its revisions. @ Revise the parking detail to show angled parking and 4" white, angled striping within the handicap access aisles and delete the plan view of the curb cut. ~ Show a $250.00 fine plate below the handicap post sign. The 12" x 18" handicap sign rnay be used in lieu of the 18" x 30" shown. ~ Provide a typical detail of the handicap stall and accessible path for buildings # 1 and #3 and another for building #2 to show an acceptable slope and path to the front entrances in accordance with the latest Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. ~ Use the "One Way" arrow signs for both egress driveways for greater driver awareness. / Stripe the loading zones with 4" yellow, angled stripes with a pavement message indicating "No Parking-Loading Zone" to deter vehicular parking. 2i) The survey shall show all existing natural features, all existing '--.-.' ' structures, utilities and elevations, elevations of adjacent properties and rights-of-way widths of adjacent roadways, etc. [LDR, Chap. 4, Sec. 7 A; 7 ft Page 4 Collier Commercial File No.: NWSP 98-019 DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Chap. 23, Sec. 5B2] eJ Provide a drainage plan showing elevations, flow arrows, proposed drainage structures, proposed treatment facilities, etc. [LDR, Chap 4, Sec. 7F] l/ Provide a rider to site plan application. [LDR, Chap 4, Sec. 7G] 6Q) Provide a detail for the 6-foot high pre-cast concrete wall. 6'0 Provide a notation on method of irrigation. [LDR, Chap. 4, Sec. 7C] 32. Provide applications for the abandonment ofN.E. 3rd.,tvenue .a~N.~, ~ X! \!~"9 ~ cNL-1 4th Avenue,[LDR, Chap. 22, Art. III] c-(' fc..mal(<.p(~~_~C::> 4:0. BUILDING DIVISION/~ .)(~\ / . ~...4-- (' 1i<:r&l.1' c.:s h.jjc:. 'P<=--y. 'f.. reD, c~-f<5d 7' " <\-,+;.,{... Comments: ( rlo IQ) (V~'\ / V Place the following note in the Zoning Data section of sheet A-I: Site signage is not approved for this project. Separate site plan review and approval is required for site signage. [LDR, Chap 21- Sign Code, Art. III, Sec. 3] / Place the following note on all sheets that illustrate the elevation view drawings of the buildings: Building signage is not approved for this project. Separate site plan review and approval is required for building signage. [LDR, Chap. 21 - Sign Code, Art. III, Sec.3] OJ Indicate on sheet A-I the setback dimension from N.E. 3rd Street to the leading edge of each building. 36. To show that the transition from the 12.5' elevation of the accessible parking spaces to the 14.27' finish floor elevation of each building is in compliance with the regulations of the accessibility code, incorporate the following information onto the plans: a. Add to the site plan (sheet A-I) a labeled symbol that represents the location and path of the accessible route that is required from the accessible parking spaces to the accessible entrance of each tenant space. The location of the accessible routes shall match the tenant spaces that are depicted on the floor plan drawings. b. Identify the type of material proposed for the accessible route. c. Identify the width of all sections of the route. d. Where applicable, identify the location of detectable warnings. e. Identify finish elevations at the following locations along the accessible route: . At the beginning of the route where it abuts the access aisle at Page 5 Collier Commercial File No.: NWSP 98-019 I DEPARTMENTS the accessible parking spaces. . Directly outside of the accessible building entrance to each tenant space. . At each location along the route where the elevation of the route is not level (level 1: 50 slope). . At the top and bottom of all ramps. f. Where applicable, identify the width, slope and length of ramps that are designed for accessibility and, where applicable, show and identify the location of handrails including providing detail drawings depicting height, shape and location. g. Where applicable, show, dimension and label the location of all landings that are required at the top and bottom of each ramp. h. Place a note on the site plan drawing indicating that the accessible route is in compliance with the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. Note: If the dimensions and other components of the route are typical for all accessible routes, indicate on the drawing that they are typical. If the dimensions and components are not typical, provide the required information for each accessible route. 37. 38. 39. 1/ 41. All aspects of the accessible route shall comply with the regulations specified in the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section 4.3, Accessible Route and Section 4.6, Parking and Passenger Loading Zones. To show compliance with the accessibility code, add to the floor plan drawings the vertical distance between the surface outside the building to the finish floor inside the building at each accessible entrance. The vertical distance shall comply with the accessibility code. Amend the ramp and landscape strip portion on the Parking Detail drawing found on sheet A-I to match the conditions of the accessible routes that are shown on the site plan drawing or amend the accessible route to match the detail drawing. If the detail drawing is the correct depiction of the accessible route, amend the side slope to reference a I: 12 slope rather than the I: 10 identified on the plan. Indicate on each floor plan drawing the proposed finish floor elevation. Note the finish floor elevation shall be at least six (6) inches above the crown on N.E. 3rd Street. Add to the Building Data section of sheet A-I the proposed use of each building. Prior to the issuance of the building permit for building number 3, provide two copies of the Palm Beach County recorded abandonment. I INCLUDE ! REJECT I , Sl "'(v-l \ "f1tl 'M'{ ,v\~{ Page 6 Collier Commercial FileNo.: NWSP98-0l9 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 42. Compliance with the building codes will be evaluated at time of permit review. The permit fee, water and sewer facility fees, county fees and state fees will be determined at time of permit review. P ARKS AND RECREA nON Comments: None FORESTERlENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: (;J\I A The applicant indicates 13 Sabal Palm trees to be removed from the site. -\' ~-< ; -~ ~~ .., .: These trees must be relocated to the greenspaces on the site, rather than G ' .( :,(~ be removed as shown on the plans. The applicant should also discuss << k possible relocation of other trees on the site. The project should continue ' ~' (4 in the normal review process. '\ PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: '~4) Change note on landscaping detail to maleluca mulch, not cypress '------ mulch. 1/ Show proper screening of proposed rooftop equipment. l/ Provide colored elevation drawings. / Show parallel parking spaces for building number 2 and parking detail. 1"48) Show proposed site lighting on landscaping and site plan. /bme s:\projects\cond of appr\ APPLICATION TRACKING LOG PROJECT TITLE: Collier Commercial FILE #: NWSP 98-019, Permit #98-3128 PROJECT LOCATION: 409 N.E. 3rd Street TYPE OF APPLICATION: New Site Plan PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED: (YIN) 0 REVIEWER'S NAME AGENT: Scott D. Over ADDRESS: AGENT PHONE: 641-7575 FAX: 374-9690 DATE REC'D: AMOUNT: RECEIPT NO.: 12 SETS OF PRE-ASSEMBLED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW: 2 OF 12 SETS SIGNED AND SEALED 0 SURVEY 0 LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 FLOOR PLAN 0 SITE PLAN WITH SITE DATA 0 APPLICATION/SUBMITTAL: DATE ACCEPTED: DRAINAGE PLAN ELEVATION VIEW DRAWINGS COLORED ELEVATIONS RECEIVED MATERIAL SAMPLES RECEIVED PHOTOGRAPHS RECEIVED o o o o o DATE DENIED: DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER: DATE OF LETTER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES: I INITIAL 1 ST REVIEW MEMO: DATE SENT: I MEMO NO. 98-300 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED I RETURN DATE: 11/6/98 UTIL. P.W. PARKS FIRE POLICE PLANNING BLDG/ENGR FORESTER PLANS MEMO# - DATE OF LETTER SENT TO SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS: 90 DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID: DATE 12 COMPLETE (ASSEMBLED) SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2ND REVIEW: PRE-ASSEMBLED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW: AMENDED APPLICATION 0 2 OF12 SETS SIGNED AND SEALED 0 SURVEY 0 LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 FLOOR PLAN 0 SITE PLAN WITH SITE DATA 0 2ND REVIEW MEMO: DATE SENT: DRAINAGE PLAN ELEVATION VIEW DRAWINGS COLORED ELEVATIONS RECEIVED MATERIAL SAMPLES RECEIVED TRANSPARENCY RECEIVED PHOTOGRAPHS RECEIVED MEMO NO. o o o o o o RETURN DATE: DATE 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED DATE UTIL. P.W. PARKS FIRE PLANS MEMO# o o o o POLICE PLANNING BLDG/ENGR FORESTER PLANS MEMO# o o o o BOARD MEETING DATE: BOARD: LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS PLACED AT THE PROPERTY. DATE SENT / SIGNS INSTALLED: DATE: CITY COMMISSION: DATE: DEVELOPMENT ORDER RECEIVED FROM CITY CLERK: 0 DATE: DEVELOPMENT ORDER SENT TO APPLICANT: 0 DATE: S:\FORMS\TRACKING LOG FORM revised 4/25/97 8 W m m;r 3.. ill FIRE & LIFE SAFETY DIVISION Memorandum No. 98-388 ill .". ~ PlANNING AND Z NING OEpt NFPA Life Safety Code 101, National Fire Code 1, all applicable National Fire Protection Association codes, and the City Fire code shall be adhered to. TO: Mike Rumpf, Act. Director Planning & Zoning Division FROM: Steve Gale, Fire Marshal Deputy Chief - Fire Rescue Depart DATE: October 29,1998 SUBJECT: Collier Commercial 409 N E 3 Street NWSP 98-019 We recommend that this project not be forwarded at this time. Water mains and hydrants are not shown on this plan. The remotest part of any structure shall be no more than two hundred feet (200') from a hydrant. LOR Ch. 6, Sec. 16. The location of the project inset on the plan is not legible. CC: File LEISURE SERVICES: PARKS DIVISION MEMORANDUM TO: Mike Rumpf, Acting Director of Planning & Zoning John Wildner, Parks Superintendent V Collier Commercial I FROM: RE: DATE: October 29, 1998 The Leisure Services Department, Parks Division, has received the plan for Collier Commercial. There are no recreation-related comments, The plan may continue through the normal review process, JW:ad ffi""<^ \ is (jU r~ !?_"ry,U w rn 1m 1\ ;; : ite( 3 0 /998 \ , ' . 1 .~ ',", ..--.J ; , ' l._"...,.__.............,.'~~....>.,. ~'>. ~ ~,._..- ::; AND ,L; CEPT. m rn@rnn\Yl~ to 3. 00 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. DD 98-343 TO: Michael Rumpf, Acting Planning and Zoning Administrato~ Michael E. Haag, Building Code Permit Administrat~ W Raymond F. Davidson, P.E., Acting City Engin r ctJ \) ,-,,' October 29, 1998 FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: COLLIER COMMERCIAL - NEW SITE PLAN (NWSP 98-019) 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS We have reviewed the subject plans and offer the following comments that should be addressed prior to the project being forwarded for Board review: Buildin2 Division (Site SDecific & Permit Comments) - Michael E. Haag (561) 742-6350 1. Place the following note in the Zoning Data section of sheet A-I: Site signage is not approved for this project. Separate site plan review and approval is required for site signage. [LDR, Chap, 21- Sign Code, Art. III, Sec. 3] 2. Place the following note on all sheets that illustrate the elevation view drawings of the buildings: Building signage is not approved for this project. Separate site plan review and approval is required for building signage. [LDR, Chap, 21- Sign Code, Art, III, Sec. 3] 3. Indicate on sheet A-I the setback dimension from N.E. 3rd Street to the leading edge of each building. 4. To show that the transition from the 12.5' elevation of the accessible parking spaces to the 14.27' finish floor elevation of each building is in compliance with the regulations of the accessibility code, incorporate the following information onto the plans: a, Add to the site plan (sheet A-I) a labeled symbol that represents the location and path of the accessible route that is required from the accessible parking spaces to the accessible entrance of each tenant space. The location of the accessible routes shall match the tenant spaces that are depicted on the floor plan drawings. b. Identify the type of material proposed for the accessible route. c, Identify the width of all sections of the route. d, Where applicable, identify the location of detectable warnings. e. Identify finish elevations at the following locations along the accessible route: . At the beginning of the route where it abuts the access aisle at the accessible parking spaces. . Directly outside of the accessible building entrance to each tenant space, Development Department Memo No. DD 98-343 to Michael Rumpf RE: Collier Commercial October 29, 1998 Page Two . At each location along the route where the elevation of the route is not level (level I :50 slope). . At the top and bottom of all ramps. f Where applicable, identify the width, slope and length of ramps that are designed for accessibility and, where applicable, show and identify the location of handrails including providing detail drawings depicting height, shape and location. g. Where applicable, show, dimension and label the location of all landings that are required at the top and bottom of each ramp. h. Place a note on the site plan drawing indicating that the accessible route is in compliance with the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Note: If the dimensions and other components of the route are typical for all accessible routes, indicate on the drawing that they are typical, If the dimensions and components are not typical, provide the required information for each accessible route, All aspects of the accessible route shall comply with the regulations specified in the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section 4.3, Accessible Route and Section 4.6, Parking and Passenger Loading Zones. 5. To show compliance with the accessibility code, add to the floor plan drawings the vertical distance between the surface outside the building to the finish floor inside the building at each accessible entrance, The vertical distance shall comply with the accessibility code. 6. Amend the ramp and landscape strip portion on the Parking Detail drawing found on sheet A-I to match the conditions of the accessible routes that are shown on the site plan drawing or amend the accessible route to match the detail drawing. If the detail drawing is the correct depiction of the accessible route, amend the side slope to reference a 1: 12 slope rather than the I: 10 identified on the plan. 7. Indicate on each floor plan drawing the proposed finish floor elevation. Note the finish floor elevation shall be at least six (6) inches above the crown ofN.E. 3rd Street. 8, Add to the Building Data section of sheet A-I the proposed use of each building. 9. Prior to the issuance ofthe building permit for building number 3, provide two copies of the Palm Beach County recorded abandonment. Development Department Memo No. DD 98-343 to Michael Rumpf RE: Collier Commercial October 29, 1998 Page Three 10. Compliance with the building codes will be evaluated at time of permit review. The permit fee, water and sewer facility fees, county fees and state fees will be determined at time of permit review. Enl!ineerim! Division (Site Snecific Comments) - Ken Hall & Sebastian Puda (561) 742-6280 1. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping and irrigation, Permits required from other permitting agencies, such as FDOT, PBC, SFWl\ID, DERM, LWDD, DEP and any others, shall be included with your permit request. 2. Show the proposed locations of lighting on the site plan and the landscape plan. [LDR, Chap. 4, Sec. 7B4; Chap. 7.5, Art, III, Sec. 8A7c and Chap, 23, Art. IIA] 3. Provide a dumpster detail showing a minimum clear opening of 10 feet. [LDR, Chap. 7,5, Art. II, Sec. 5J] 4. Add a general note to the paving and drainage plan that all striping, signage and markings shall be in accordance with City Standard Drawing B-90012 and its revisions. 5. Revise the parking detail to show angled parking and 4" white, angled striping within the handicap access aisles and delete the plan view of the curb cut. 6, Show a $250,00 fine plate below the handicap post sign. The 12" x 18" handicap sign may be used in lieu of the 18" x 30" shown. 7. Provide a typical detail of the handicap stall and accessible path for buildings # 1 and #3 and another for building #2 to show an acceptable slope and path to the front entrances in accordance with the latest Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. 8. Use the "One Way" arrow signs for both egress driveways for greater driver awareness. 9, Stripe the loading zones with 4" yellow, angled stripes with a pavement message indicating "No Parking-Loading Zone" to deter vehicular parking. Development Department Memo No. DD 98-343 to Michael Rumpf RE: Collier Commercial October 29, 1998 Page Four 10. The survey shall show all existing natural features, all existing structures, utilities and elevations, elevations of adjacent properties and rights-of-way, right-of-way widths of adjacent roadways, etc, [LDR, Chap. 4, Sec. 7 A; Chap. 23, Sec. 5B2] 11. Provide a drainage plan showing elevations, flow arrows, proposed drainage structures, proposed treatment facilities, etc. [LDR, Chap. 4, Sec. 7F] 12. Provide a rider to site plan application, [LDR, Chap, 4, Sec. 7G] 13. Provide a detail for the 6-foot high pre-cast concrete wall. 14. Provide a notation on method of irrigation. [LDR, Chap. 4, Sec. 7C] 15, Provide applications for the abandonment ofN,E, 3rd Avenue and N.E. 4th Avenue. [LDR, Chap. 22, Art, III] MEH/KH/SP:bg XC: Bulent I. Kastarlak Don Johnson Ken Hall Sebastian Puda J:\SHRDAT A \Development\Building-6870\Documents\TRC\Collier Commercial-l st Review,doc PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #98-310 SUBJ: Site Plan Review - I st Review - Collier Co TO: Michael Rumpf, Acting Manager of Planning FROM: Larry Quinn, Assistant Public Works Direct r DATE: November 6, 1998 The dumpster enclosure at the above site should be 10' X 10' inside measurement. The applicant must supply a detail drawing of the enclosure with the plans. LQ/cr LQ/cr ill NOV 6 .. rn rn m rn 0 \VI rn RECREA TION & PARK MEMORANDUM TO: Mike Rumpf, Acting Director of Planning and Zoning L(. n JJ: Kevin John Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist rO ~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. FROM: Re: Collier Commercial New Site Plan - et review DATE: November 5, 1998 The applicant indicates 13 Sabal Palm trees to be removed from the site. These trees must be relocated to the greenspaces on the site, rather than be removed as shown on the plans, The applicant should also discuss possible relocation of other trees on the site, The project should continue in the normal review process. Kjh File CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Mike Rumpf FILE: NWSP 98-019 DATE: 111098 SUBJECT: Collier Commercial REFERENCES: PZ 98-301 ENCLOSURES: I have the following comments reference this proposal; FROM: Officer Riggle 1. There is no loading zone for building 3. This building is equipted with 6 overhead doors which facilitates commercial traffic loading and storage. 2. Handicap detail must meet code reference access area. 3. Mark areas in front of all overhead doors which are not loading zones as NO PARKING areas. MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 98 - 309 TO: Mike Rumpf, Acting Planning Director FROM: John A. Guidry, Utilities Director DATE: November 12, 1998 SUBJECT: Collier Commercial Buildings - New Site Plan 1st Review We offer the following comments on this project: GENERAL COMMENTS 1) All utilities easements shall be shown on the rectified landscaping drawings so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. LD R Sec. 7.5-18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 2) Dept. of Health permits may be required for the water and sewer system extensions serving this project. (Sec. 26-12) 3) Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1500 g.p.m. as stated in LDR chap. 6, Art. , Sec. 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater. (see Sec. 26-16(a)). Please submit these calculations with your Health Department permit application and plans. 4) Sec. 26-34(E) of the City Code requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon my request for signature on the Health Dept. application forms or within 30 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 5) Comp Plan policy 3C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may, therefore, not be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1) The plans submitted do not indicate how the proposed buildings will obtain water and sewer service from existing or proposed mains. They also do not include sufficient fire protection. All proposed water and sewer lines must be shown on the plans. Those water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all existing or proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in Sec. 26-33(a) of the Code. 2) This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the certificate of occupancy. 3) LDR chap. 6, Article IV, Sec. 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. 4) Appropriate backflow preventers will be required on the domestic water service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in accordance with Sec. 26-207. 5) A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this office has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to serve the project. (Sec. 26-15) 6) The waste stream from any manufacturing process must meet the City's pretreatment requirements. A sampling point must be provided to allow monitoring of this waste stream. (Sec. 26-143, 26-147) Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella (375-6404) of this office. JAG/PVM Xc: Skip Milor File MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 98 - 309 FROM: ~ .:::~'RjS) ~ G W rn rn \ C.i .1:-. !L"L"-~ n 1r1\1 .lcnt I U j Ijl; NOV I 31fS8 \ I~i j Collier Commercial Buildings - New Site Plan 151 Review L~-rLA\~;,m]GAN!) ~ONiNG DEPT. . ""'.---.' We offer the following comments on this project: Mike Rumpf, Acting Planning ~o~ John A. Guidry, Utilities Director ~ ~ November 12, 1998 TO: DATE: SUBJECT: GENERAL COMMENTS 1) All utilities easements shall be shown on the rectified landscaping drawings so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. LDR Sec. 7.5-18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 2) Dept. of Health permits may be required for the water and sewer system extensions serving this project. (Sec. 26-12) 3) Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1500 g.p.m. as stated in LDR chap, 6, Art. , Sec. 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater. (see Sec. 26-16(a)). Please submit these calculations with your Health Department permit application and plans. 4) Sec. 26-34(E) of the City Code requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon my request for signature on the Health Dept. application forms or within 30 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 5) Comp Plan policy 3C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water rnay, therefore, not be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1) The plans submitted do not indicate how the proposed buildings will obtain water and sewer service from existing or proposed mains. They also do not include sufficient fire protection. All proposed water and sewer lines must be shown on the plans. Those water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all existing or proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in Sec. 26-33(a) of the Code. 2) This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the certificate of occupancy. 3) LDR chap. 6, Article IV, Sec. 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. 4) Appropriate backflow preventers will be required on the domestic water service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in accordance with Sec. 26-207. 5) A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this office has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to serve the project. (Sec. 26-15) 6) The waste stream from any manufacturing process must meet the City's pretreatment requirements. A sampling point must be provided to allow monitoring of this waste stream. (Sec. 26-143, 26-147) Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella (375-6404) of this office. JAG/PVM Xc: Skip Milor File ~'" In) Ul U WI ffi \..~ lUll JMll 9 9:S, \...J LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT J fLANNING AND ONING DEPT. BOatl! 01 Supervi,..,r$ C, Stanley Weaver Kermil Dell John t. Whitworth III Soer01wy,t,l,naQII' WiJliarn G. Winters A..I&Ia~1 M*n~f Ronald L. CrC>r'le A~am.y Perry & Schone, P.A. 13081 MILITARY TRAIL DELRAV BEACH, FLORIDA 33484 January 19. 1999 Michael W. Rumpf. Chairman Planning and Zoning Division City of Boynton Beach Post Office Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Re: Collier Commercial ( 409 NE 3rd Street) Technical Review Committee Meeting-Tuesday, January 19, 1999 Dear Mr. Rumpf: This project is located outside the Lake Worth Drainage District's boundary and the District has no comments regarding the referenced project. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review and comment on this project. Should you have any questions or concerns please contact me. Respectfully, LAKE WORTH DRA~7 D~CT ~. ~ Lisa A. Rowland Right-of- Technician Delray Beach &. Booa Flalon (5'31) 498-5363 · Boynton Beach & West ~a1m Beach (561) 737-3835. Fax (561) 495-9694 E'd 17696 S617 les 3~VN I 'Veta Hl,tK)1\I\ 3>11;1.., HOet.:l Hd60:17 666~-6l-t DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. BD 99-021 rn ~@~~_Wl~ , ..2. a ~ 1*-- ~NING AND ZONING DEPT. TO: Michael Rumpf, Acting Planning and Zoning Administrator ?/JA Michael E. Haag, Building Code Permit Administrat6f,~t It) January 21, 1999 IJ FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: COLLIER COMMERCIAL - NEW SITE PLAN (NWSP 98-019) 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS We have reviewed the subject plans and recommend that the request be forwarded for Board review with the understanding that all remaining comments will be shown in compliance on the working drawings submitted for permits. Buildine Division (Site Specific & Permit Comments) 1. Indicate on sheet A-I the setback dimension from N.E. 3rd Street to the leading edge of each building. 2. At time of permit review, provide detail drawings that verify the transition from the elevation of the accessible parking spaces to the finish floor elevation of each building is in compliance with the regulations of the accessibility code. All aspects of the accessible route shall comply with the regulations specified in the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section 4.3, Accessible Route and Section 4.6, Parking and Passenger Loading Zones. 3. Indicate on the site plan and/or survey the flood zone that the project is located within. Where applicable, amend the finish floor elevation to comply with the minimum elevation required for the subject flood zone. 4. Prior to the issuance of the building permit for building # 2, provide two copies of the Palm Beach County recorded abandonment for the easement shown on the plans. 5. Prior to the issuance of the building permits for the buildings, a recorded unity of title shall be submitted that combines the six lots into three lots. The lot arrangement of the three new lots shall match the lot/building layout depicted on the approved site plan. 6. Compliance with the building codes will be evaluated at time of permit review. The permit fee, water and sewer facility fees, county fees and state fees will be determined at time of permit review. MEH:bg XC: Nancy Byrne \\CH\MAIN\SHRDA T A \Development\Building-6870\Documents\TRC\NWSP 98-019 2nd review Collier Commercial.doc ...;EPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 98-301 FROM: Bulent Kastarlak, Director of Development Bob Borden, Assistant Fire Marshal Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Ofc. Robert Riggle, Police Department Pete Mazzella, Utilities Department Michael Haag, Building Division Ken Hall, Engineering Division Larry Roberts, Public Works Director John Wildner, Parks Division Ray Davidson, Acting City Engineer Bob Donovan, Supervisor, Permit Application Group /?1v;z. .- Michael W. Rumpf Acting Director of Planning and Zoning TO: DATE: October 22, 1998 RE: SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES 1 ST Review - New Site Plan Project - Collier Commercial Location 409 N.E. 3rd Street Agent Scott D. Dyer File No. NWSP 98-019 Permit No. - 98-3128 Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Please review the plans and exhibits and transmit formal written comments to me no later than 5:00 P.M. on November 6. 1998. When preparing your comments, please separate them into two categories; code deficiencies with code sections referenced and recommendations that you believe will enhance the project. Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval: 1. Use the review standards specified in Part IV, Land Development Regulations, Site Plan Review and the applicable code sections of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments. 2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete, however, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the reviewer by contacting Scott Barber. 3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the documents. Page 2 Development Department Memo PZ 98-301 Collier Commercial TO: TRC Members 4. Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with other departmental improvements. 5. When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review specified. 6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memorandum, within the time frame stated above, to me. The memorandum shall state that the plans are approved and that they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and that they recommend the project be forwarded through the approval process. All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted to me for distribution to the applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memorandum. Scott Barber will be the Planning and Zoning staff member coordinating the review of the project. First review comments will be transmitted to the applicant along with a list of Technical Review Committee (TRC) members. The applicant will contact TRC member(s) to clarify comments. Amended sets of plans will be submitted prior to, or brought to the TRC meeting. Amended plans and outstanding comments will be reviewed at the TRC meeting to confirm that the project is ready to move forward to the Planning and Development Board meeting. MWR:bme Attachment XC: William Bingham, Fire Chief Marshall Gage, Police Chief John Guidry, Utilities Director Don Johnson, Building Division Sebastian Puda, Engineering Division Central File s: \Projects\Collier Cornmercial\NWSP\1 streview-plans