APPLICATION
'17ie City of
'Boynton 13eac/i
. -
r~ c;r Tv&-
Pfanni"tl & Zcni"tl 'Department
100 'E, 'Boynton 'Beadi 'Boulevard
P.O, 'Bo~31O
'Boynton 'Bead.., :Jforilfa 33425-0310
(40i) 738-7490, :J.'U: (407) 738.7459
August 5, 1992
Mr. Michael A. Mrotek
2624 Lake Drive North
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
Dear Mr. Mrotek:
This is to acknowledge that you have filed an application with
the City of BOYnton Beach to appeal a determination made by the
Building Official regarding an improvement on your property, i.e.
fence height. The filing of the application meets the criteria
mandated by the District Court of Appeals (Case No. 91-2002).
We will review your application and if changes are needed or
additional information needed we will contact you.
Very truly yours,
(l' ~ . I If.' \
\..,. ......v\.kl-::> iJ..~~ -~'..;
Christopher Cutro
Planning & Zoning Director
CC/jm
A:MROTEK.JM
.gmerUa~~ qateway to the ejuifstream
August 3rd, 1992
P.O. 157
Boynton Beach, Fl.
33425
Mr. Christopher Cutro AICP
Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach, Fl.
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, fl. 33425
Dear Mr. Cutro,
Pursuant to our conversation 7-31-92 regarding the waiver of fees
for application to the Board of Adjustment, as you indicated would need
approval by the city commission, I am submitting this written request.
The reason for this waiver is that back on 10-9-89 Circut Judge
Rodgers agreed with the city attorney in a motion that I should seek a
administrative remedy before the Board of Adjustment under Section 10C&D
of the Boynton Beach Code, Appendix A-Zoning, which I applied for 11-3-89.
My application was submitted for review of Section 10 C&D, but altered by
the building offical to Section 4J 1&2, a variance. Had the application
remained unchanged the decision would have been in my favor as the Board
vote 4 yes and 3 no, adequate for approval in review of administrative
orders/decisions.
The Fourth District Court of Appeal has mandated that this appeal
be heard again by the Board of Adjustment.
In as much as I did not receive what I applied for 11-3-89, and paid
for it, I respectfully request that the required fee for this application
to the Board of Adjustment be waivered.
Thank you for your time and consideration inthis matter.
azL
M.A.Mrotek
407-369-4609
"
~orm No. 121, Revised 5/1/75
DIRECT PAYMENT REQUISITION
please issue a check in the amount of $ 275.00
ToI
MICHAEL MROTEK ~ J
?o 130;< ~S7 (3/.9.4C,CJpL
f5/'J r""* //;/0-1 .3 3 f z.-S- _ /
~~=:en~2~~O a~~~::~; e:\i~~n R~;~~q~f ~~~,~II~~:;~~ ., 410
For:
Requested by Plannina and Zoninq
Date R/lq/q?
FUND DEPT BASIC ELE OBJ AMOUNT
001 000 4 413 ! 70 $275 00
TOTAL $275 00
Approvals:
Dept. Head ~L.R ,~~
Christopher utro
Finance Dept.
City Manager
(Ir\ \.,~
M E M 0 RAN DUM
September 2, 1992
THRU:
Sue Kruse, City Clerk
~~ 7
Christopher Cutro, Planning and Zoning Director
TO:
FROM:
Michael E. Haag, Zoning and Site Development
Administrator
RE:
Board of Adjustment - Case No. 171
Accompanying this memorandum you will find an application and
supporting documentation for the above referenced case.
Fee to cover the review and processing of this application has
been waived through vote of City Commission at the meeting of
August 18, 1992.
The legal advertisement for this request will be forwarded to
your office after review by the City Attorney and City Manager.
c
E. Haag
cmc
A:CLERKMEM
Attachments
XC: Project File