APPLICATION
"'''''JII "'''''II UI",.II I QA'
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
BOARD OF ADJUSTHENT APPLICA1'ION
Submittal Deadline: See scehdule of date. for Board meetings and submittal
dates a.,,= #~oq
Please print (in ink) or type SUbmittal date: 6/19/95
The undersigned owner(a) hereby respectfully petition(s) the Board of
Adjustment to grant to petitioner(s) a special exception or variance to the
existing Zoning or Sign Code of .aid City pertaining to the property
hereinafter described and in Support thereof state(a):
property involved i. described as follows: Lot(s) 1
BlOCk
Plat Book 23
, S\1l)diviaion
Deierl Park
, Page 236 or otherwise described as follows:
Not yet assigned (NE corner of Boy ton Beach Blvd. & NW 7th CtJ
Property Address
The fOllOWing docwaents are required to be aullmitted with this application to
form a Single package. Incomplete paCkage will not be accepted:
1.
TWo sealed ~urve~ by a r~lstered surveyor in the State of Florida, not
over six (6 mont 8 old, indicating:
A. All property l.i.nes
a.North arrow
C. Existing structures and paving
D. Existing elevations
E. Rights-ot-way, with elevations
F. Easements on or adjacent to the site
G. Utili tie. on or adjacent to the aite
H. Legal description
I. Number of acres ~o the nearest one-hundredth (1/100) of an acre
J. Loeation sketch of property
K. Surveyor'. Certific.te
2. Two site plan. properly dimensioned and to scale Showing:
A. All proposed .r.rUctures
8. All existing structures that are to remain on site
C. Setback lines for a~l structures drawn perpendicular frQlll the
properly lines to the c1ose.t vertical wall of structures
~. Use of each structure (or use. within mul~iple occupancies)
E. Use of adjacent properti.. inCluding right-ot-way 11nes for all
streets and alleys, sid.walks. turn lanes and driveways
F. Elevations of the lowest finished floor of all structure. on the
site
3. Certified list of name. and post office addre.... of property owner. and
legal d.scriptions of th.ir property within 400 feet of subject
property, a. r.corded in the County courthous.. Such list shall be
accompanied by an Affidavit (..e attached) stating that to the beat of
the applicant I. knowledge, .aid list i. complete and accurate.
v
5. Statement of special conditiona, hardships or reason. justifying the
r.quested exc:eption or variance. Respond to the six (6) questions below
(A-F) on a .eparate sheet (PIe... print or tYPe):
A. That special conditions and circumstance. exist which are peculiar
to the land, structure or building involved And whieh are not
applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same
zoning district;
6-15-95 ; 4:23PM
Boynton Bch fax~
;'13
6.
Paqe 2 of 3
B. That the speci.l cond1tions and circumstances do not r$sult from
the actions of the applicant;
c. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the
applicant any special privileqe that is denied by this Ordinance to
other landa, bUildings or structures in the same zoning district;
D. That literal interpretation of the provisions of this chapter would
deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other
properties in the same ZOning district under the terJlUl of the
Ordinance and WOuld work unnec8ssa.ry and undue hardship on the
applicant;
E. That the Variance granted is the minimum variance that will make
possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure;
F. '!'hat the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the
general intent and purpose of this chapter and that such Variance
will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental
to the public welfare.
An applicatiO!1 fee in the amount of $400.00, paYable to the City of
Boynton Beach, must accompany a completed application. The $400.00
application fee covers a request to vary one (1) section of the Code.
Seeking relief from more than one section of the Code will require
payment of $100.00 for each additional Code .ection.
Name and addre.. of owner:
7.
8.
Name of applicant:
Papa John's USA 11492 Bluegrass Parkway, Ste. 175, Louisville,
KY 40299
Interplan Practice, LTD.
933 Lee Road, Orlando ~2810
4U/lb4)-)UU~~~
Signature of Applicant: ~ _
I3EMMIE EcJ5VrGE ~r.p.
Applicant's address:
Applicant'. phon. I:
Date:
6/16/95
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
'l'o be comnleted by the Build1na Official or Representative
1. Property h presently zoned: C - d. P'ormerly zoned: AI/A
2. Property Control Number: 0 9 - T.3 - 'IS" - ';lO - u ~ - 00:> D- () 0 I D
3.
Denial "'as made upon existing zoning M' "'n requirements ( list
section.r_1 ot Code trom which relief is required):
Sc.c.1i<) /I.J: Of (! ~ f2-.:J.. 2..:l..)e.'\J6 i TIl6- C~ '{4}1(>
-
Nature of exception or variance required: ll> o""'.I{ If.
LOf/.o"vD :;:'...)i<<I:!. ' 0 (<iti)l.IC~ \'f\f{\<.I,v(y St)J~C"'S f~o"'"
(11((<"\ t'o
Date: /V/A-
4.
s.
Permit denied:
Building Department
:(09
NM
Ca.. NWllber:
-;- l 17 In; 9:5
Meeting Date: '-J() ''I ,. ,
.
----..._--
A,u() 5 EultJAJ i1. H.J.
#
6-15-9~.~ 4:23PM;
Boynton Ben fax~
CERTlFICATION
Page 3 of 3
To THE BEST OF MY KNOWLZDGE AND BELIEF, THE ATTACHED LIST IS A TRUE AND
CORRBCT LIST OF PROPERTY OWNERS WI:rJiIN FOUR HlJNDREI) (400) FEET OF THE
APPtrc...,,'S P~. ~.
~ENT
Leanne Mettel
APPLlCAT. WPS
Page 3 of J
;.14
~
f?
{~
~. 'Q(
-,.} \;, \
~ \o~
.;{, j
,y \i"'V
l'''( '7 l~
C.4sc :# cJ.eJr;
I, '~\~ t ~:"~ 1-1- 17f ,A f.. ~ ;
~~ '"'" <:t~r
.11 t: - I ~ ~ III ""I
.." - .." ...-
'..,,, ,. ,-
, .
t. ~~ 2..~ ,~ .. ;. ~, 1-
\---=- - "~ ........ ~I
r- ~J~ 1.. o~ ~ CI)~~:
I" 'f,
~:jg,~~~
~ 0 :. .!!:l
-.. !: ~ ~ ~ ~ ""
~l! ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ :
~~'-;
- ~
1-
~ ,~
, ~~\~ ~
" '4 W ~,
,- \
OI.IY
';,..;Dr'f-
. ~
!
J-.,
'"
/"-
'/
II
"
II'D
"
"
50./
1. /I A(
eo
/ . \.,
\. '
~ 15,:1.
;;;
~
11.10-
,;;
,1' on
;/ i!
It. ..,'-:; /,,'1 'I :. 'L ~~ ,'" ==
I. r" I.... I.. \ 1~.1.~
. .......11;. ~ 50 ~ ~ \l:1 'to
,... t '. \ 2-f ~ .. ~
() - -
~~.
s '1$
~ A
~ 1':.1 ~
ld1) 11'1'1 ,1(
~
.~
o ~:.
~ : , /V s r
,9 ,.. t.D 7~ 7'S' s. ff ...,~
~.. ~?I,,~ I
~,~ ~ IJ /;; ~ ..,..!, ~ .~~ ~: 2~ . ,,1. ~
p , . ." {" .:......... crJ ~ _::/ ., J l.
~. o. ", 130 "i .,~,:\. W~.. ; ~
I ~ 1~ ~ ,if;, 'i'; III.... T-
. 5""'s --./-
Ot-~~1f--P~I-"'--~\"'~ Cl
t ~ .....! 'Q ~ 'V'/ ~...
; ~/.t.~ .. ~.I Q:: 4.,......
~. ~~,.. '/ :/"
I
I 00-'.1
I ,.. - qJ
, ~'f~.IO"
I \~.--
I
~
aD
2~
~
ST
,t.
~ ;'
.....
. I
~
~,
~
.~
",""
GIrl
...
~ ~
~ ,..
't.\
"
o
o
~
'2;' i
..
,..
~
J- 1-
119.. (rI
,.,. \eZ
...,
1"'\
/'
g. <f.I
./
f.
"
"
"
b "
"" \
~, :
- - -
tJ: -'.
.II .
- ..... ,
,-
- - - 502
I l'tQ '. IJ
I ,,,,:" ;
- - '.
,..1
Y ~ III 3
... '< .. /
, ,O:l. .......
.llt -........ ()
CO- @ ~ l' " ::t .. ~ +-' N ,J
-'-...:... 'ilL. ~ .. -- ID ,e
. 7~~ I ~ ~~ ,-t/f.S' 1
,; - ~ I
,ti) , - ~ ~.'- i
~ '.--.:--- - - ------"
ti~ ..,...
I
,
,
, .;
. 1f
\
\
,~
,
\
. ..'a. ...
r- ---;J" I
3 .
~c
-
'-
....
I'H
l~. 1 ~
), ()40
.
27.1 ~.
17 ..,
~'
4;..
...--v
~
........
:
-- . A tJ
c r, ~(. , - f'/' "'I. ."
\.';'" . ..:,If' _
~ ~
I~
. ~
'H
h ~
~
""
3~
~
~ '"
\
I ~ ",...
I
I
, ~
\ I .u
\
'. "fa
-
">
~
,r'
~
.
-.
:.....
-co
I~
........
l4.J-
~g
- ~
:
,1
';I'
1140
.!b
,~
, ,
elf)
J ';j.f.!i [tt~
'- '
~ #~ '(
III II
~ / -J
<(
~ ~ C(
0. '-
. ~- "V)
-:-- ~
'" CJ
<:
g ~ -
~
--i
~ 1:f~ J/~~
1+'1.5 l
Z "
;;;.-, I-S 5 F. W
~~
3.\
-
o
II
-
-
(\~\. t ~
~, IS".' .5'
/
'~I
,~l>
. ...... .
--~
IS')
-,
f-
I
119
1-
I~
a;>~ -, J
1- I _
22 :>0.22.1 6.1
: '. ,.~
,15 lJJ.... J 1.1,
,..,..... I A' ~_
I
..-- -
.!i.>-. ,~
-
410 /~e
....8..,. -- ;,' ~
. .~e
" .
:..!
.,
,', .~-
I- 95
-'
.I~
I
I.__~ I,'
././----- ................
/
Papa Johns Pizza
NE Comer of Boynton Boulevard and NW 7th Court
June 19, 1995
Attachment to the Board of Adjustment Application
Statement of Reasons Justifying the requested variance of providing no loading area for a
food service establishment.
A. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure or
building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same
zoning district.
A separate loading area is not needed for this type of business due to the delivery times scheduled during off
hours.
B. That special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant.
The deletion of the loading area is not a special condition to Papa Johns as a loading area is not needed and
most stores do not have a separate loading area.
C. That granting the variance will not confer on the application any special privilege that is denied by
this Ordinance to other lands, buildings or structures in the same zoning district.
Granting of this variance will not confer any special privileges denied to others operating a similar business
where a loading area is not needed.
D. That literal interpretation of the provisions of this chapter would deprive that applicant of rights
commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the Ordinance
and would work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant.
The literal interpretation of the provision requires a loading zone which may be needed in most restaurant
establishments, however due to the nature of the carry out/delivery business with a limited menu, a separate
loading area is not needed.
E. That the variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of
the land, building or structure.
The variance of the deletion of the loading area will assist in making reasonable use of the parcel ofland as
the site size constraints are of great concern in developing this land.
F. That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this
chapter and that such variance will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to
the public welfare.
The granting of this variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this chapter and will not
be injurious to the area involved or public welfare. The intent of a loading area is to provide a separate berth
so as not to conflict with the operations of the business. Since deliveries will be on off-hours of operations,
the intent of the code can be met without providing a separate loading area.
Bolt O,4si ,F ~ () 7'
Nm: PPRI NT(aO~)':;: uRq.: :-.~1-.""- .
"f'ht. tn.trumeI1t __ ~ by: ~
Nune Wi~~iam P . ~,;,....
AddNM J.615 Farmn P1ace. Suit:e 2 V
West Palm D--roh. FL 33401
d4 Ct1Sf If: dO,
Return to.
Name william P. Doney, EsquiJ:e
~. 1615 Forum Place. Suite 200
West Palm Beach. FL 33401
~ .1 SoS. No. 61-1193912
Cnon_.2 SoS. No.
~ AppraIser.
Parcel Identification No.
08-43-45-20-06-000-0010
F'EB-01-1995 3:09pm 95-03.:2291-
ORB 8604 pg 98
f 11111111111 III I.' 'U' I .11
Con 95,000.00 Doc 665.00
DOROTHY H. WIU(EN, CLERK PB COUNTY, FL
W'ARRANTY DEED
<STATUJ'ORY FORM - SECTION 689.02, P.s.)
TIds Indenture, made this 1st day of February 19 95, Betw'een
Wal.ter Dutch, as 'I'Xu.Stee
~ po.t offtao aJd~ i. 240 Sou'thl.and P.oad, Palm Beach,
of the County 01 Palm Beech , State of Florida , granto...., and
Papa JOhn a& USA, :me.
-whaeepoet offke ad~i. 11492 Blue Grass Parkway, Suite 175, l:Joui.svi.lle
of the County of Jefferson. , State of I<ent:ucky 40299 , szan.tee'",
Witnesseth. that .aid ~ far and in COl\8ideration of the sum of Ninety-Fi.ve and 00/100
($95,000.00) Do~,
and otl..- sood and valu.ble conaiderationa to ..xi grantOl' in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt _hereof Is hereby
aclcno_ledged, has granted, bargainM Old 8Dld to the said gran_, and grantee's heirs and ...igns fol9Y'8J", the following
dllllCribed land. 5ituate,. lying and being in Palm Beach County, Florida, to-wit:
LOt 1, DEIERL PARK, Plat Book 23, Page 236, LeBS Pa:roe1.
previously deeded to F1orida. State Road Department as
:more particularly described as the South 13 feet of Lot
1 and that part of said :tot 1 1yinq within the exte:rna1.
area. foDlled by a 25 foot radius arc tangent 1::0 the west
line of said :tot". J. and tangent to a line 13 feet north
of and paral.le1 to south ~ine of sa;i.d Lot ~. (Lying
in Palm Beach COUnty, F1orida.)
and said grantor does hereby Cully warrant the title to INlid land, and win defend the same ~st lawful clahns of all ~
who..-r.
-Gnlntor" and "sran-- ani used for &Ingular or plural, as conb;lXt :nquire8.
t, grantor has h-.mto Nt grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written.
ourp~ )/~~;P~ (Seal)
C~tor
~ Printed or tyJ-i naxne: Wa1 tar Dutch, Trustee
(FIrR wttn-)
PrlntecI or typed _
U! tV... J\\ A'L.:;t. !G0l Q.suJ
(Second W~
Printed or typed NUrle: ICr i 5 -t~ L . K.<:. I \ ~ v
<Seal>
Grantor
Printed 01' typed name:
STATE OF Florida
COUNTY OF Palm Beach
THE FOREGOING INSrRUMBNl" __ a~ledsed before D\It thi..
IP~by Wal.ter Dutch. Trustee
hid produoed
My couuniNlan 8XJ>b-:
/S-l- dayof ~ .
, "Who is (01' are) Jato DIe or w-ho
as identific&tIon.
~
if.
J~ A ""kii.
Notary PubUc
Printed. tyJ-i, or stam.ped IUUl'le:
..oS: .. '. 1CRISTl! L. ta:LLER
"'}'" MY COMMlSSlON , CC3lI6I25 EXPIRe!;
BDtIXO IMAU 11IG'tM.. ~.INC
(Serial NUDlt.r, if any)
F-761 (nw. 1119S) I~]
-
......................."".,.,.
_---"ot ORClq,. '1..
f~~~C~\
'Ol 7V~
~... ~:;
~~ II: ;
", ~..E
" -
"~o1CH .....
."",~."".........,-
I certify this document to be a true copy of the record in my office
this NINTEENTH day of JUNE, 1995
WIL ,Clerk of Court0 ach County, FL
'vt./~,- ./ / Deputy Clerk
DOROTHY H.
By
06/16/95 16:10
'8'502 263 7352
PAPA JOHN'S INT.
141 002
[)~/ir.f T~!kk! Rzztl/
June 16, 1995
City Of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
(407) 375-6260
Subject: Letter Of Authorization (Proposed Papa John's Pizza, N.E. comer of Boynton Beach
Blvd. & N.W. 7th Court, Boynton Beach, FL.)
To Whom It May Concern:
Let this letter serve as authorization for Interplan Practice Ltd. to represent Papa John's USA, Inc.
as our selected agent in accordance to our site development criteria for the above referenced
location.
I thank you for your continued support in our rapidly expanding program. If you should have any
questions or if I can be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at your earliest
possible convenience.
Sincerely;
Papa John's USA, Inc.
~
A. Donald Godsey
General Manager, Corporate Construction
ADO/me
PAPA JOHN'S INTERNATIONAL, INC.
11492 BLUEGRASS PARKWAY -lOUISVILLE. KY 40299 - (502) 266-5200 - FAX (502) 266-2925
B () If Ct'~ 1tc).C)9
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Inurplan Practice Ltd
ArchitecturelEngineeringllnterior Design
AA-C001302
933 Lee Road, Suite 120
Orlando, Florida 32810
Tekphone40~645-5008
Fax 407.629-9124
INTERPlAN
PRACTICE
o ITY () 'P Bo'l/Jw,J 8€Actl PtAtJtJltJGo oep--r.
To
rOO E~ ~.,otM ~ Boi.tlel1tlY~
~tl1M ~ fl ~~~2~
6f.a.r~ l.oJ\jle.t'" I Plo..nnet'
Attention
Papa..JOhVlS P\l-~
Project
\lo..na.nce SObM~~~ fa- No LDAJ.t~ ~~
Subject
--1*37(P
Project No.
(g. I q .c15
Date
H~D V&.. I "e(Z...
We are sending via
J.t07/31J;-6 ()OO
Telephone
Copies Sets Date
l
t
2-
'2-
Description
~)IClA.hOn
Uf-<<pltU'l dl4'k 1t: s:?1Glb ..-~ %0. ot> -Rill'\j -Pee.
5eA.let{ Su.rll~ S
'!3/~YLLJJ~e~ Sj~ pld.n$ .
~tfffeol I,st Df n~~ ~~, lij~.sop. plOr-rnt oWf'\.U'S ~liYl ~,
A~'-t fOr lis-t t>f pvcpev-"t ll~
L.e.tt-er t:I- t.WtMrra1.:tr'O")\
fWcf' o.P ~w~'P . .
917A--remem- of g~AJ C8l'\J.lltills /~ ..{Jy f?1ve.st
Remarks PI~e ~ fh~ ~lfe- scAbm;ltztI f'~~ -fbr p la.Le.ffl et'\t- t1Y\ -the
1tJl~ fY>o..nL of A-rfdtJSt7hel1t" Mee::trhj 'If liDU. hD.Ve. t41\~ 1verlr~ t pl~
.aod free olD ~-aa- Me. lXt l~o" - 3'13 -5SS.2.
--=:IhM\1L ~tA. &r (fLU" A.SSi'stzu.,<:e 11\ 4pe.d"-h~,.fh~ ~ves+. YOlAr hiJp I' ~
-=:R~t'\j -the. afpl,~Ol'\-S If. cr~~ Offre~.fAt-~.
~t1MlE EuSTA-cE
By
~ ~o~eJ.j I p~~ ~oh~s
cc "JiM Cos-tetlo J ):f\Te.-rp 1tU'\
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
PAPA JOHN'S PIZZA
(Boynton Beach, Florida)
Prepared for.
Papa John's Pizza
11492 Bluegrass Parkway
Louisville, KY 40299
(305) 592-3100
Prepared by:
Tinter Associates, Inc.
3303 West Commercial Blvd., Suite 201
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
(305) 484-3633
June, 1995
95-2035
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION. . . . .. . .. . . . .. . .. . ... . . . . .. . .. . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . 1
DEVELOPMENT PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS ...................................... 6
FUTURE CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
TRAFFIC GENERATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
CAPACITY ANALYSIS ................................................ 23
CONCLUSIONS ..................................................... 27
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1- SITE LOCATION MAP ........................................2
FIGURE 2- SITE PLAN ................................................. 4
FIGURE 3- DISTRIBUTION ............................................ 19
FIGURE 4- PEAK-HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC .............................. 20
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1- EXISTING DAILY CONDITIONS.. .. . ... ... .. . .. ... .. . . ... .. .. . . .. 8
TABLE 2- EXISTING P.M. PEAK-HOUR CONDITIONS. . . . . .. . . . .. .. .. . . . . . .. . . 9
TABLE 3- FUTURE DAILY CONDITIONS .................................. 13
TABLE 4- FUTURE P.M. PEAK-HOUR CONDITIONS.. . .. .. . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
TABLE 5- TRAFFIC GENERATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
TABLE 6- ROADWAY LINK SIGNIFICANCE... . .. . .. . .. .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . ... . 22
TABLE 7- TOTAL DAILY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
TABLE 8- TOTAL P.M. PEAK-HOUR CONDITIONS.. .. . ... . . . .. .. .. . .. . . . . . . 26
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A - TRIP GENERATION STUDY
APPENDIX B - TEST TWO ROADWAY NETWORK
INTRODUCTION
This is a Traffic Impact Study for the development of a Papa John's pick-up, delivery
only pizza restaurant located at the northeast quadrant of Boynton Beach Boulevard
and N. W. 7 Court in the City of Boynton Beach, Florida. See Figure 1, Site Location
Map.
The analysis in this report concludes that the proposed development does not
represent an adverse traffic impact, as evidenced by the following conclusions:
· The future roadway network will be adequate to provide acceptable
levels of service on those links which are in the project's Radius of
Development Influence (RDI).
· The proposed development can demonstrate compliance with Test
One of the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Code.
· The proposed development is also in compliance with Test Two of the
Traffic Performance Code.
This report follows the guidelines set forth by the Palm Beach County Traffic
Performance Standard and the City of Boynton Beach.
1
NW 22nd AVENUE
~
~
LaJ
U
Z
LaJ
~
OLD BOYNTON ROAD
BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD
.,
~ L_
I
I
I
WOOLBRIGHT I ROAD
L,
I
PAPA JOHN'S
LOCATION MAP
LaJ
::>
z
~
BOYN ON
BEA
PROJECT
OCEAN AVENUE
o
~
::>
~
~
~
~
lJ)
o
N.T.S.
FIGURE
Tinter Associates, Inc.
1=~ TrauportaUoa .pfteerl
~ 3303 W. Commercial Blvd. Ste. 201
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33309
(305) 484-3633
1
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The plan for new development on the site will provide for a Papa John's pizza
restaurant. The development operation provides pick-up and delivery only. No
indoor seating for dining will be provided. Figure 2 illustrates the proposed
development.
Site Plan
The proposed development will be located at the northeast quadrant of Boynton
Beach Boulevard and N.W. 7 Court in Boynton Beach, Florida. The site will be
comprised of 0.22 acres of which 1,142 square feet will be dedicated to the building
area.
Site Access
One access point is proposed for the site. This access point will be located on N.W.
7 Court approximately 200 feet north of the northerly edge of pavement of Boynton
Beach Boulevard. There will be no direct access to and from Boynton Beach
Boulevard.
Scheduled Buildout
The anticipated buildout for the proposed site is expected to occur by the middle of
1996. This report assumes that total traffic impacts will occur at the time of buildout.
3
IJ~ I 0
b!
I~~
I.t I.. N.T.S.
I~ .t
I .""L ~
-----... ----..
.1
., -1Q~1IGl." 1
!
I
I It ~j I
" I
1
, I
, 1 -.
~ IS
0#-- 1
I 1
I ~ ~ I
I > IE p Qi 1
I- IU n 1
~ I
B I' ·
t \.
u I <> ~ ,.t 1
:r II 1
I- ,
r- ,
=- I ..'J . .cr · fl
I
Z I .. -
I 1
, t U'
I
I I
I
..1
I 41,. .
I
.
I ... 1
I . - 1
I
t
I 1
1
! I
I
I
It 1 ..
I i ;
I '- --~-----
...,. '"
I
r BOYNTON 6EACI-l 6L.YD.
PAPA JOHN'S
SITE PLAN
Tinter Associates, Inc.
1=~ t'rauportattcm ....,neen
8 3303 W. Commercial Blvd. Ste. 201
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33309
(305) 484-3633
FIGURE
2
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARD
The Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code sets forth the criteria
which evaluate the potential traffic impacts associated with proposed development
in Palm Beach County through the Traffic Performance Standard.
Provisions of the Standard
The Traffic Performance Standard consists of two tests, both of which must be
satisfied in order for a site-specific Development Order to be issued:
· Test One - Evaluation of the roadway network on a daily and peak-
hour basis at the buildout of the proposed site, and
· Test Two - Evaluation of the Year 2010 Interim Transportation System
Plan.
If both of the tests can be satisfied, the project can be given development approval.
5
~-'--''''-----'---'-'_'_'"_ 'u.__"_.______',_,__ __ __ ,.. _~._~_.______.___,.~_...,~ .._ o. ..._ ____.__._______..._._________.__._._________.______..___.._
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS
The foundation for the analysis of traffic impacts from the proposed site is the
existing conditions on the roadway network.
Existing Traffic Volumes
Table 1 presents the 1994/1995 annual average daily traffic conditions while Table
2 presents the p.m. peak-hour traffic volumes from traffic count stations in the area.
Only the p.m. peak hour was examined since the proposed development is not open
during the a.m. peak hour activity of the adjacent roadway network. Counts were
taken from the most current Palm Beach County Metropolitan Planning Organization
(MPO) Traffic Volume Count Map. Peak-hour volumes were calculated by applying
a "K" factor of 0.091 to the daily traffic volumes. This "K" factor is acceptable as
indicated in the Traffic Performance Standard.
Caoacity Analysis
Generalized Daily Two-Way and Peak-Hour Service Volumes and Capacities are
found in the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standard. They include Level
of Service "0" thresholds:
Lanage
Daily
Peak Hour
Two-lane road
Four-lane road
Six-lane road
13,400 vehicles per day
29,400 vehicles per day
45,000 vehicles per day
1,220 vehicles per hour
2,670 vehicles per hour
4,100 vehicles per hour
The vlc ratios shown in Tables 1 and 2 are simply the volume divided by the
capacity. If the ratio is one (1.00) or less, then the volume on the roadway is at or
better than Level of Service "0", which is acceptable as defined by Palm Beach
County standards.
6
Tables 1 and 2 indicate that one roadway in the area (Boynton Beach Boulevard
between 1-95 and Seacrest Boulevard) is operating at an unacceptable level of
service on an average daily and peak-hour basis.
7
TABLE 1
PAPA JOHN'S PIZZA
Capacity Analysis
Existing Daily Conditions
Road Segment Volume Capacity vie
Boynton Beach Boulevard
Congress to Old Boynton Rd 29,135 45,000 0.65
Old Boynton to N.W. 7 Court 39,968 45,000 0.89
N.W. 7 Court to 1-95 39,968 45,000 0.89
1-95 to Seacrest Blvd. 29,748 29,400 1.01
Old Boynton Road
Congress to Boynton Beach Blvd. 8,860 13,400 0.66
8
TABLE 2
PAPA JOHN'S PIZZA
Capacity Analysis
Existing P.M. Peak-Hour Conditions
Road Segment Volume Capacity YlJ;.
Boynton Beach Boulevard
Congress to Old Boynton Rd. 2,651 4,100 0.65
Old Boynton to N.W. 7 Court 3,637, 4,100 0.89
N.W. 7 Court to 1-95 3,637 4,100 0.89
1-95 to Seacrest Blvd. 2,707 2,670 1.01
Old Boynton Road
Congress to Boynton Beach Blvd. 806 1,220 0.66
9
FUTURE CONDITIONS
Before evaluating the relative traffic impacts from the proposed site, the future
conditions on the roadways without the project impacts were established. These
conditions are described by the future traffic volumes expected by the middle of
1996, the Papa John's development year of buildout.
Programmed Roadway Improvements
An examination of both the Palm Beach County and FOOT Five Year Work Program
indicates that there are no scheduled improvements to the roadway network in the
immediate area of the proposed site.
Future Traffic Volumes
In order to assess the availability of capacity at buildout of the site, future traffic
volumes were formulated.
Palm Beach County provides compounded growth rate data in their Traffic
Performance Standard Reference Document, 1994. This document provided very
flat or negative compounded growth rates along both Boynton Beach Boulevard and
Old Boynton Road. As such, a one percent per annum growth rate was used to
estimate future conditions on these roadway segments.
Maior Developments
Another component of the development of background growth data is approved
committed development in the area.
. According to the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Ordinance, a major
project is any project, including those within municipalities, which is:
10
-_._...---._."_._._---_..~._--~._~,-_._--_._. .._--_...--.--_._-_..~~.__._--_._._---_.,.__._----,--_..---~--,,_.-
· A Development of Regional Impact (DRI); or
· a project which generates more than seven thousand (7,000) net trips;
or
· any project of any type or size which is contractually or by condition
of approval bound to financing or constructing any portion of a major
thoroughfare which is not site related.
The Ordinance further states..."Using the major project maps, all traffic from the
unbuilt portion of major projects approved prior to the County Engineer's approval
of the proposed project's traffic study which will add more trips than ten percent of
the Level of Service "0" to any link within the proposed project's RDI during the
buildout period of proposed project shall be specifically accounted for in projecting
traffic. "
As indicated by the Traffic Performance Standard... "only the traffic generated from
the unbuilt portions of the major projects as set forth above which are projected to
be built during the buildout period of the proposed project shall be considered."
An examination of the County's list of major projects revealed two major DRI's in the
area of the Papa John's development:
. Motorola DRI - located at the southeast corner of Northwest
22nd Avenue and Congress Avenue.
· Quantum Park DRI - also known as Boynton Beach Park of
Commerce located at the southwest corner of 1-95 and Northwest
22nd Avenue.
11
The Motorola DRI is approximately fifty percent built with 2,704 daily trips yet to be
generated over the remainder of its buildout. It can be concluded that traffic yet to
be generated from the unbuilt portions of the Motorola DRI will not exceed ten
percent of the Level of Service "0 "capacity on any of the Papa John's Pizza' RDI
study links.
The Quantum Park DRI also has unbuilt portions of the development with a
somewhat lengthy buildout. Development yet to be built at Quantum Park
concurrent with the buildout of the Papa John's Pizza development was estimated
to equate to approximately 4,600 daily trips. Considering the employment nature
of Quantum Park, distribution would be weighted to and from 1-95. As such, it is not
anticipated that traffic associated with the unbuilt portions of Quantum Park would
impact the Papa John's study links by more than ten percent of their Level of
Service "0" capacity.
As such, traffic from each of the unbuilt portions of the DRl's was not included in the
analysis of background traffic.
Future Capacity Analysis
Tables 3 and 4 present the results of the future capacity analysis on a daily and
peak-hour basis, respectively. The volumes shown in these tables represent the
future average annual daily and peak-hour traffic volumes anticipated by the middle
of 1996. The volumes do not include the anticipated traffic from the Papa John's
Pizza development.
Those roadway segments on Tables 3 and 4 with a vlc greater than 1.00 are
projected to operate at unacceptable levels of service.
12
~-._~~-------_._-----_._--_._._.__.__.,----_.__._~._---------------_.---.- - ".' ---_._.._~._--,.-
TABLE 3
PAPA JOHN'S PIZZA
Capacity Analysis
Future Daily Conditions
Road Segment Volume Capacity vlc
Boynton Beach Boulevard
Congress to Old Boynton Rd 29,499 45,000 0.66
Old Boynton to N.W. 7 Court 40,468 45,000 0.90
N.W. 7 Court to 1-95 40,468 45,000 0.90
1-95 to Seacrest Blvd. 30,120 29,400 1.03
Old Boynton Road
Congress to Boynton Beach Blvd. 8,971 13,400 0.67
13
TABLE 4
PAPA JOHN'S PIZZA
Capacity Analysis
Future P.M. Peak-Hour Conditions
Road Segment Volume Capacity vlc
Boynton Beach Boulevard
Congress to Old Boynton Rd. 2,684 4,100 0.65
Old Boynton to N. W. 7 Court 3,683 4,100 0.90
N.W. 7 Court to 1-95 3,683 4,100 0.90
1-95 to Seacrest Blvd. 2,741 2,670 1.03
Old Boynton Road
Congress to Boynton Beach Blvd.
816
1,220
0.67
14
TRAFFIC GENERATION
Traffic generation is the method by which the amount of traffic or the number of trips
to and from a proposed site is estimated. Two standard sources are used to
estimate traffic generation - Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip
Generation, 5th Edition and Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code.
However, there was no published date available that accurately depicts the trip
generation activity for this type of pick-up, delivery only restaurant. As such, a
review of studies of similar sites as well as data collected at a similar site were
undertaken.
Comparison of Similar Sites
In order to develop an accurate trip generation rate for this development, two
methods were employed:
. Review of similar studies in the Central Florida area.
. Data collection at an existing Papa John's Pizza development in
Palm Beach County.
Two studies were conducted in the Central Florida area of existing Papa John's
Pizza sites. These studies were conducted to establish a trip generation rate for a
proposed Papa John's Pizza development in Gainsville, Florida. The aggregated
results of these studies provide for a daily trip rate of 80.6 trips per thousand square
feet and a p.m. peak hour rate of 19.45 trips per thousand square feet.
Data were also collected at an existing Papa John's Pizza restaurant in Palm Beach
County. This site is located at 832 Military Trail in the City of West Palm Beach,
Florida.
15
~-_._..._._."-~---------~.,,..~--~-'----------_._- -- ...-
A copy of this trip generation activity and a summation of the subsequent results can
be found in Appendix A. The data and summations as found in Appendix A had
been previously submitted to Palm Beach County staff for their review and approval.
Verbal approval of the study and its results were granted by County staff on June
27, 1995.
As a result of the recent data collection activity and a review of available data, a
consensus was reached as to an applicable trip generation rate for a Papa John's
development in Palm Beach County. As such, a rate of 226.38 trips per thousand
square feet will be used on a daily basis. Additionally, a rate of 29.16 trips per
thousand square feet will be used on a p.m. peak hour basis. Further, an in/out split
during the peak hour of SO/50 will also be used to estimate peak hour activity.
Proiect Traffic
Table 5 summarizes the trip generation activity using the generation standards as
established through the recent data collection activities. This rate has been
approved by County staff.
16
~---'--------"'----'----------"""'-"---'-'-'~---~'-..--.--.-.-..-"----.--......--------------.-----.--____"______._.___n.__.._______..
Land Use
Papa John's Pizza
TABLE 5
PAPA JOHN'S PIZZA
Traffic Generation
Intensity
Daily
Trips
1, 142 s.f
259
17
- P.M. Trips-
in out
17
17
DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT
The distribution and assignment phase of the analysis involves allocating traffic
generated as a result of the Papa John's development to the roadway network.
Distribution
Traffic distribution is the pairing of trip ends from the subject site with other land
uses in the area. In this case, the predominant pairing of trips attracted to the Papa
John's development are those produced by the residential properties immediately
around the site.
Traffic distribution is based on a gravity model which considers the attractiveness
and ease of travel to competing destinations. The attraction of trips to the Papa
John's development is expected to be predominantly home-based and non-home-
based work related.
Figure 3 illustrates the percentage of traffic assigned to each of the roadways in the
study area.
AssiQnment
The distribution of project traffic to surrounding zones is used as a basis for
assigning traffic to specific roadway links and intersection turning movements.
Figure 4 depicts project assignments on a peak-hour basis at each of the project
access points.
The impact that the resulting traffic from the Papa John's development may have on
the roadway network is analyzed in the capacity analysis section of this report.
18
.._._.__......._~---_._------_.~---------~-------_._---"'-"'-'--~"-"'---~----'---'-------'-----'
OLD BOYNTON ROAD
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD.
ILl
:)
z
~
(I)
(I)
ILl
0:::
e"
Z
o
u
~
:)
o
u
,....
~
z
PROJECT
SITE
Tinter Associates, Inc.
1=~ Trauportatlcm Rn"~"",
~ 3303 W. Commercial Blvd. Ste. 201
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33309
(305) 484-3633
PAPA JOHN'S
DISTRIBUTION
$
N.T.S.
C
0:::
~
:)
o
CD
li;
ILl
0:::
~
(I)
FIGURE
3
Q
N.T.S.
SITE
t
!oJ
~
'"
~
z
c
PM
IN
( 17)
OUT
( 17)
)
PAPA JOHN'S
PEAK HOUR
PROJECT TRAFFIC
Tinter Associates, Inc.
1=~ TrauportatioD ~"fteen
~ 3303 W. Commercial Blvd. Ste. 201
Ft. Lauderdale. Florida 33309
(305) 484-3633
FIGURE
4
SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT
Significance of the impact associated with the projected traffic from Papa John's is
measured in terms of the amount of existing capacity absorbed by the project traffic.
Radius of Development Influence fRDI)
According to the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standard, since the Papa
John's development generates 259 external daily trips, a maximum RDI of one-half
mile was established. The Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standard
requires that an analysis of all links within a one-half mile radius of the project be
examined.
Impact on Roadway Links
The impact of the project-related traffic from the Papa John's development is
calculated in terms of the amount of the existing daily Level of Service "0" Service
Volume, which is the criteria established by the Palm Beach County Ordinance.
Interpreting Significance
Table 6 shows all roadway links within the maximum RDI. These roadway links are
within one-half mile of the project and subject to detailed analysis according to the
Traffic Performance Standard.
21
~_._~-~--~._------~--~-_._.- ,.---.. -...-- .._._._-~'----'--'----_..-
TABLE 6
PAPA JOHN'S PIZZA
Roadway Link Significance
Existing
Project LOS "0" Percent
Road SeQment Trips Capacity LOS "0"
Boynton Beach Boulevard
Congress to Old Boynton Rd. 52 45,000 0.01
Old Boynton to N.W. 7 Court 104 45,000 0.01
N.W. 7 Court to 1-95 104 45,000 0.01
1-95 to Seacrest Blvd. 52 29,400 0.01
Old Boynton Road
Congress to Boynton Beach Blvd. 52
13,400
0.01
22
CAPACITY ANALYSIS
The requirements for capacity analyses begin with an examination of conditions on
all impacted roadway links as identified on Table 6.
Link Capacity Analysis
The existing and future conditions on the roadway network in the area of the Papa
John's development have been presented in an earlier section of this report. Tables
7 and 8 present total average daily and peak-hour traffic conditions at the middle
of 1996, including the background growth component and the traffic expected from
the proposed site.
Compliance with the Standard - Test One
The primary policy determination in the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance
Ordinance is that all links within the ROI must operate within the appropriate level
of service at buildout of the proposed project. As Tables 7 and 8 indicate, one link
(Boynton Beach Boulevard between 1-95 and Seacrest Boulevard) within the ROI
operates at an unacceptable level of service. Therefore, this roadway segment is
not in compliance with Test One of the Standard.
The Standard further identifies roadway segments which have a vlc ratio of greater
than 1.00. The Standard allows these identified road segments to exceed capacity
by up to a total of five percent of Level of Service "0" as computed on an AAOT
basis. These roadway links eligible for the excess five percent will be presumed to
pass the average peak-hour test. The excess five percent shall be allocated on a
first-come-first-serve application-filed basis; provided that no project may use more
than one-fifth (1/5) of the five percent available on any link.
23
Palm Beach County has identified the segment of Boynton Beach Boulevard
between 1-95 and Seacrest Boulevard as over-capacity. Therefore, the use of the
excess one-fifth of five percent of capacity is applicable.
The over-capacity segment, as found on Table 7, has an existing level of Service
"0" capacity of 29,400 trips per day. The Standard allows that one-fifth of five
percent, or 294 daily trips, may be added to this link. Project traffic assigned to
Boynton Beach Boulevard between 1-95 and Seacrest Boulevard total 52 daily trips,
as noted from Table 6. This is well less than the 294 dai!y trips allowed by the
Standard.
Therefore, the Papa John's development is now in compliance with Test One of the
Standard.
Compliance with the Standard - Test Two
Test Two of the Traffic Performance Standard involves an examination of the
County 2010 Interim Transportation Plan. Appendix B identifies all roadway
segments in Palm Beach County projected to operate at unacceptable levels of
service in year 2010.
The Test Two ROI is limited to the directly accessed links on the first access major
thoroughfare (Boynton Beach Boulevard). Since none of the Test Two ROllinks are
found on the deficient roadway segments as identified in Appendix B, the project is
then in compliance with Test Two of the Standard.
24
TABLE 7
PAPA JOHN'S PIZZA
Capacity Analysis
Total Daily Conditions
Road SeQment Volume Capacity YlJi.
Boynton Beach Boulevard
Congress to Old Boynton Rd 29,551 45,000 0.65
Old Boynton to 1-95 40,572 45,000 0.90
N.W 7 Court to 1-95 40,572 45,000 0.90
1-95 to Seacrest Blvd. 30,172 29,400 1.03
Old Boynton Road
Congress to Boynton Beach Blvd. 9,023
13,400
0.67
25
TABLE 8
PAPA JOHN'S PIZZA
Capacity Analysis
Total P.M. Peak-Hour Conditions
Road SeCJment Volume Capacity vie
Boynton Beach Boulevard
Congress to Old Boynton Rd. 2,691 4,100 0.66
Old Boynton to N. W. 7 Court 3,697 4,100 0.90
N.W. 7 Court to 1-95 3,697 4,100 0.90
1-95 to Seacrest Blvd. 2,748 2,670 1.03
Old Boynton Road
Congress to Boynton Beach Blvd. 823 1,220 0.67
26
CONCLUSIONS
The foregoing analysis has addressed the relative impacts associated with the
development of the Papa John's site. Specifically, the conclusions are:
. The project will generate 259 external daily trips of which 34 external trips
will occur during the p.m. peak-hour,
. the traffic impacts are in compliance with Test One of the Traffic
Performance Standard, and
. traffic associated with the proposed development is in compliance with
Test Two of the Traffic Performance Standard.
It can, therefore, be concluded that the development of the Papa John's site should
occur, as all requirements of applicable Standards have been met.
DJM:kma
c:\data\95-2035\rep
27
APPENDIX A
Trip Generation Study
1=-\
Tmter Associates, Inc. · Transportation Engineers
3303 West Commercial Boulevard . Suite 201 . Ft Lauderdale, Florida 33309 · (305) 484-3633 · Fax (305) 484-9612
June 13, 1995
Mr. Dan Weisberg, P. E.
Palm Beach Count Traffic Engineering Division
160 Australian Avenue, Suite 303
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
RE: PAPA JOHN'S PIZZA
TRIP GENERATION STUDY
TINTER ASSOCIATES PROJECT NO. 95-2035A
Dear Mr. Weisberg:
pursuant to our previous discussions, this letter will serve to summarize the data collection activity
and the subsequent establishment of a trip generation rate for a Papa John's Pizza Restaurant
located in Palm Beach County, Florida. The purpose of the data collection activity was to increase
the database with regard to trip generation activity for this type of pick-up and delivery only
restaurant.
EXISTING TRIP GENERATION DATA
As you may recall, in our previous meeting, I presented you with data regarding the trip generation
activity for two similar sites in Central Florida to establish rates for a site in the Gainesville area.
The results of that study indicated that the average of the two sites would provide for a daily trip
generation rate of 80.6 trip ends per day per thousand square feet of building area. Further, the
study provided for a p.m. peak-hour generation of 19.45 trips in the p.m. peak-hour.
WEST PALM BEACH DATA COLLECTION ACTIVITY
As per our previous discussions, we had decided to undertake data collection at a free standing site
within the City of West Palm Beach. This particular site is located at 832 Military Trail, in the City
of West Palm Beach just north of Summit Boulevard. Data collection took place on Tuesday, June
6, 1995 during the nonnal business hours for this particular Papa John's Restaurant between 11 :00
a.m. and 12:30 a.m. Table 1, at the end of this correspondence, summarizes the data collection
activity at the Military Trail site. As noted on Table 1, a total of 163 vehicles were recorded which
provided for 326 daily trip ends. Considering the size of the Military Trail building (1,440 square
feet) a trip generation rate of 226.38 per thousand square feet was established based on the data
collection activity of June 6, 1995. Figure 1, attached, shows the peaking ch~racteristics at the
Military Trail site. As noted from Figure 1, the greatest peaks occur between the hours of 3:00 p.m.
and 6:00 p.m. and again a "spike" occurs between 8:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m.
- ---_._~-_._-_.._--.._,~--_..__.._----' -_.-"
TABLE 1
PAPA JOHN I S PIZZA
SUMMA:RY OF TRIP GENERATION
TIME PERIOD PICKUP DELIVERY TOTAL TRIPS TOTAL TRIP ENDS
11 :08AM - 12:07PM 5 5 10 20
12:14PM - 13:16PM 7 1 8 16
13:25PM - 14:32PM 7 2 9 18
14:34PM - 15:35PM 3 3 6 12
15:55PM - 16:57PM 7 11 18 36
16:59PM - 17:58PM 11 10 21 42
18:02PM - 19:07PM 9 9 18 36
19:14PM - 20:16PM 9 8 17 34
20:18PM - 21:22PM 12 12 24 48
21 :24PM - 22:23PM 8 6 14 28
22:27PM - 23:25PM 5 4 9 18
23:25PM - 0:25AM 7 2 9 18
Total number of of trips = 163.
Total number of trip ends = 326.
Size of the existing site in West Palm Beach is 1440 Sq. Ft.
For 1000 Sq. Ft. trip generation rate = 326 · 1000 /1440 = 226.38 trips/1000 Sq. Ft.
FIGURE 1
PAPA JOHN'S PIZZA
SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION
45---
:~~~f~~:I~~-I-'f~:III-E~~3~I=IIt~~:E~
r"
Palm Beach Count Traffic Engineering Division
June 13, 1995
Page 2
COMPARISON OF AVAILABLE DATA
As a result of the two Central Florida studies and the West Palm Beach study, a comparison of the
available data was evaluated. Table 2, at the end of this correspondence, shows the comparison
of this data. The Central Florida stores provided for an average rate of 80.6 daily trip ends per
thousand square feet while the West Palm Beach study provided for a daily rate of 226.38 trip ends
per thousand square feet. As noted, the Central Florida sites provide for a very conservative trip
generation rate on a daily basis when compared to the newly collected data at the West Palm
Beach site. Therefore, I would like your input into this matter with regard to the Central Florida trip
generation data versus that of the West Palm Beach data. While I am not quite comfortable utilizing
the aggregated results of the two Central Florida studies, I certainly do not want to be overly
aggressive by using the results of the West Palm Beach study verbatim. Therefore, I would like to
discuss this matter further with you so that we can develop an acceptable trip generation rate to be
used for the proposed site on Boynton Beach Boulevard west of Interstate 95 in the City of Boynton
Beach.
As always, should you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me
di
nnis ~. Miller
Senior Associate
Traffic Engineering
DJM:kma
c:ldetIIlll5-~_l102
xc: Don Godsey
Clark Stilwell
TABLE 2
PAPA JOHN'S PIZZA
COMPARJ:SON OF AVAJ:LABLE DATA
SITE SIZE DAILY GENERATION RATE GENERATION RATE PEAK HOUR
SO.FT. TRIP ENDS PER 1000 SO.FT. PM PK 11000 SO.FT TRIP ENDS
CENTRAL FLORIDA 2629
WEST PALM BEACH 1440
212
326
80.6
226.38
19.45
29.16
52
42
The trip generation rate for the Central Florida sites were obtained by averaging the results
of two similar sites.
LIST OF ROADWAY SEGMENTS FAILING TEST 2
Roadway
Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd
Haverhill Rd.
Palm Beach Lakes Blvd.
Okeechobee Blvd.
Military Trail
S.R. A-1-A
Lake Ida Rd.
Jog/Carter Rd.
Linton Blvd.
Yamato Rd.
Federal Highway/U.S. 1
Glades Rd.
Powerline Rd.
Palmetto Park Rd.
S.R. A-1-A
From
To
Northlake Blvd. Okeechobee Blvd.
Community Dr. Okeechobee Blvd.
Palm Bch. Mall Main Ent. Okeechobee Blvd.
Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Military Trail
Westgate Ave. Southern Blvd.
S. County Rd. Southern Blvd.
Military Trail Congress Ave.
West Atlantic Ave. Linton Blvd.
Interstate 95 S.W. 10 Ave
Interstate 95 Boca Raton Blvd.
Yamato Rd. N. Mizner Blvd.
Jog/Powerline Rd. Interstate 95
Palmetto Park Rd. Glades Rd.
Boca Rio Rd. Interstate 95
Palmetto Park Rd. Broward Cty Line
Source: Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering, February 3, 1994
- - -".__._--_..._.~--_.__.,_.._,--._-_. ----- - --_.-_."'"'--_._--_.._---~._-._.- - -. -~----'-_.._._._-~--,---_.._------_.._--._---_.__...._.-----------.-.-_. -
APPENDIX B
Test Two Roadway Network
- .-._.,.._---~._-------'_._-*
---"'-----,.._--"--~-_._,_._----_.,,--"_._--_. -- ---