The URL can be used to link to this page

REVIEW COMMENTS /, ~ /VIOI:/'//J/1_-=-NIr' c;::>/ '"J J) /:.. l4)jfi~ ~"~f1()N /)f~ r~ ~ SJ'u 1,4b.~ ~"'.oJ-ny - ! (~J ~f,f;;j.m1 I L&(..().,4,AJJV : (~~T' ~RN~ of tf.;"h). ~ '/.I~:~r- ,u;rs~ /0' ~ ST4~ s'~,,,,.. ~-s I It)" (~,l/..J!-I>h Slut'{. CJ ~~ 64z~~ ~,..., IJ ~Ge~ tu;1/JJ,j;/,,~ ~/(.pr -,. / 6-"J~;7:' - Jt&A ~ :;;;~~ .- .:::IL.t.V#2ljU~ ~ .- 7 ! {) /1 ;0 161/ /'111&%-" ( S;;. 'R;),. it1 ~'I1p ( /N /1Yl.v~'-'7.. /U-.,A, J.~ FLUo/l.~Sc.~ ~~: S~ fAl: I!~: ~ /. Jr1~.J# SUh6P'J--I1I~ 10" /?c;.- ~r ~ :YW~j ~6~ .~/"'<. ~.~jl'6. ,~.-.:.-~ "s:~ ~ J&.-" ;~~<'.1.0.)'" .)3,~ 7- <"~.41:~ I :.WJ;/~" /:5o~ ~,~<- t!'c.. ~ #;''&70 - 4...>p__ $/W~ .. j>41S ~61(61 t'LU5 ~ -J J ) f/~ ~!(j/ P~f;<" (Y\lotj ,.ft..k..-'J101.Jt fRD~'" ~~. 61S1/N! [Y/..'J0G,./{",,,", r9f!1t..d,J..j /iJo'i ./ttfrv6'#' /. I .' J!t>~I!:A!;;Z,,,,.ut;.1- ]>I- I~ rt"J.;jrJ; r;.;.Cf6 ~p /~' e IY 5ii&tK" s ~ A/IJT-W.Jer i"';) I ~f/i. ; ~e) ,J L.4tt..?I/:-'Ir -J&: :";~,'yt-...,.,.~~r ;,(;~ #..M ~Jlp~ ::Z:.:t. I./~;.I~~.AY'- ~30iJ!1 foblJ 1?~"~~11 6Yp /i-f//t':AM,f.#'-.It:L'.),-f,Mr ,e:.;"'.r[!.__. /..,~.:J.;, .1tJD . /"1.ft-:"'1".,.?Sr ~ ~~: -:;jt~- 'Zt-;3 ~*;p't;~ c f2'h&, _JI j( ;f"_'- ~I.JfJhA-rr/~-,)-1o '- ~j~~J/.4a:7 t~ ~~,_tk.lid-S7b { J6.1:-r /~?~B''-11~ -75~ F~ /,4f5 ~ ~ ~., // ~/ -/ . .r .(~~ \\D~ ~ ~ $'V 5 G~ \\ ~\:1./ \ (- ~ " I>' ,,{ /. ...,:/_ ~\V ,~., "- "" - ,~J! I f \ C>:.. y. 60. ~ o @ "\" \..:.: ~ -P ~ " ~~l/ I} t A~" C\S, !.l f/oI/, j ,(I(~ i( /j II ~~ 9 " 0 if .l 'I / (p~ ~if7 q,' l ,Vi uY d); . / ,~ ,') J \' -\ '( :# ':> \rQ ~' d ,:(, ~ (? \ (' / \. \;I \/N '( 'J , "3 .,~, ~,~ I,H / t:I~ " (1-' ( f l ~ II <' \ {YJ ~ ,v; ~. $'.... . ~ 'v '" t\ " ,\~' f \ 1,,'<1 ,~' '1/ ~\)V ~y 10 ~ f-. ~ v j / U~LV1 - &,u j h-it~ ,.- z :-) /__OfJ-LtI --7 .'~ ~"N .,/ a~1 l' (Vi '- _, \I " / ! ' , ! G ' r\~. . _ - 'JjU/tV.l/ 'fv\ ~.'. \ ~}j\ , 4'''-' f c.-, ,II 1 --- C;/f '11 ~<- ,,1 j,f __ ~ eX ,J {I -.~ I,~ 1 ' , ,I () . '. ,., .' -IL<vl.- ;:, to _ 4 If;;l - I U O;;L .- ;' 14' y:.. if t/ - jI1I1~.J e~'W- - i Ii'" , /D --t ~LI ;01 f.-3Di iL' 'I,?J 2-' tD f )0 I ?J r~ - ~~G / N (,~ - '1? 4- if??) C)J.AJ-f"iJ _ IV D _;)) " · . /W)J ~ ~I 'l7.'JO~ .' "v"- .- , . . A!Y;Y! VI ' " !/t ,_. g-"" - 7,_i 3- .~ '>1 -::. l-l-~~ I"t !~ IYil ~'N~ f1'''} ,,'131-h~,tj' ~.c ti~Jp , '/1 Ai ..., ._ ;1 11 - l! A~' - 1 CO" _ ' ."- .' I'n . n. -, -OJ"," ,~ . I d L \ III Cl. ':7(:' Ae: (: qJ::V;:-A.?" - ~! TI ,~.1- > i I .;;;:)'1 J ,!.' . *' flc. '~J- Jh, _ 15'(-'; .;2 '1 / .3 -( 11 - ~.I:t/;Jw /lie,' \ f\ kr: ,.. -1 f1 I i. (' -- IV t\ .- ~o f'-t"h ,,,~,,,\)., - '" ~ - ~ b- \P r ' Y -v ) //1/1 ... L fl'c.-IY- -- ~ ~,. . . nL j/~ ft'C4j;-<>~ '. ~,' , . ,'U-J" 1 ;t<.U~ '7l { T'^ ., / _~, ,,' . _" L -,/ .JL r,JcrvJ-. ..ff-<-, 7,:..J ./ 4-~ <L4',J ~, ,)..,uv-<-.:L tV'"' ,j,," ".' l C f I. ' " '/' i ....4</' /-- I J /(< 1fiJ'i:fJk /l4/J~.(..s; "tu-,.,v l(~ V G bJ/kA. 'T"/7 1/ _ "c I " ,,1, r' .f/c. /le,.e., tJ.r j1.A- --L ~ ;L:.;:2. ,'t.J ,J ,v ~ '. / /J t -tI. v /"}." -J;. ~ )<./1.' <1 Lr.J-~' I \.' .(, ~1'-" ().- · f' ,. ., ~",) " ~ -t bo' ;/l!u--~~:6.IC;l- ~__ 16 P' Jr vJ!.': J-" i ~ _ -f-/~;- ~ ~,C vJ' I'~.:n.v /-'.v tJ-1,j}.. , . JJ. /J,' / -L d' vi' fI /~ :.....L<). L/V'-~- r '/., ' I /, ~t',.. L'" (j "...f. '-r:~ "I..-' .p"-'/> ~I ?-" ["- Jl.VJ' f-#{U'cj~/ 4f' pi .4 :.. r- ~,' j ;' (f1 A '1 i; \. /?~~'l/'>."zjL .t~W/ flu.. .. A~ Jc.i. . / 0/ /1 -' ~ I il 1.,/1, ,0, ,/ ~7 d,;' O-Z ,~~71 '- .L/- ~'V'7'" ~ ,- - J( :~,/' 'Z: ,'~\, .)~ , \....t/-f/ f~ ~fri/U / (} ,~~t - 7 _ /' t-f- '7 ,~'L r ..) I / !. /I.it .J-1fi 'A ,;1:/ ~V tL..- + , .",' ",-riJJ1."" ~ ;1 UNj j;~uY--tlJ..'4tr \.. . ' XvV 1 ' II)? 1,'/ l 1". it'\.<.~"'; 1 J -+f I'; ^ I->\. {i...C'"'" ." .' '\ II I~'" -Vtj "~ j- ,-L. C "~V,...e-1.. /0- I' .; C' J" I ,/ ~ ~.,.r: ~.: :jI# ,-,"" ~.... - //~' ~.;.-::.--:;-";j,,#" ~ ; V'.~ 0.. ~ /' -,,,, ~>:4 ~.v'-~?:' 4;/ / ~.;,. ~~_ .~~. h" ~---- J Ii tiP' ~ +~. ;lc.;ted:~ I <)r' 'b- ~<t,,/vJ- P-"':!... y d,,~ ~, t ~,z~t 1"0' , t' ,{ {L/\.tf.-l""'" ~f ~ v -1 tc-1/JyC..?:t:.... ,{..? . -,-' f . -:. -fl~4~i , , v ' /7". /l~::t" v 0 "i ~ .1.- "j, f '{ z.A' · · t '1 >'; e (\i.,uh/J-",..... {>>'I/ #..,1 (j,Aty:..t L of ,." d ~~ /~;17~. ",ytc-7? ~ -a- pt ~ /t~.&rL A~~iL ;UL:v ~~^~ ;& ~~ ir~L:~<- - e1 d~ /1C L-oZ- ~ .ffi-. (07.u~7~'<;> / 7'''-' i v-e. ,/)L.t't!. cZ '1'0 t-r.../e 1.- ~e: ~<-. -jv ~/L:: -('( ~ -4 LL~:' ~f--e (r~7'- :~JU--c2 ~ .~/c7,L.(? ~- fJr-f . "lPJ2 "tl J + /f'I,-,-"t. ~ l}it~)j,~" .jc=R2 y wl.l4r IX;> we ~ f..D iI .-1'0 I v .r.-.L.J}I'".i. {I/ S P-/ 71;> --v.4'18/r I~. .r~ ~ .....p c. ~' -1.J/A/\jl I- / ,J',J~ '{I'.' i,t"d' _ #_ ;.o(t~J"J#. yJ)..-. . .,.. 'rambri Heyden P-::.. (,+,P--!:>IIVc:> j1Jt -r t/'J'W(.:.!) f~.I.. .. ..tober 31, 1996 . _.M'''''' J:; ./.......'5'f'-. u- ~"" ., page .:.') f;:1 ~ rr <=-,,/1::' r'~ ~J~v( ')U(~ I!'. ..~.':J... , tJ5 ~~ i:s:t~ ~:5:::': 'the TRC meeting that staff did not mske any comments to Circuit City on the onsite CarMax sign package that was submitted the CarMax site plan second submittal. er such sign plan should have been part of the overall Quantum sign pIa e us written comments. I To the extent necessary I please consider the onsite sign plan submitted with the CarMax site plan ~ as part of the Quantum master sign plan amendment. In any event, -( they all need to be reviewed and considered at the same time before 0 the P&D Commission and the City Commission. ~.. f ~ Thank you for your consideration of these items. ~~/UJ--. ()/'J--~ rfP:~up- ~ ~rr tfJiU vy JGW/smw ~ ly Jfl Willard cc: Steven E. Five1, Esquire (Telecopy 317/263-7038) Rocky Biby (Telecopy 407/562-9689) Paul McClellan (Telecopy 804/527-4804) James D. Thornton, Esquire (Telecopy 804/697-1339) Carrie Parker (Telecopy 407/375-6011) Mayor Jerry Taylor (Telecopy 407/375-6011) ORL95 29648.1 . SMW , ~-c~ . \r~~, I '" \ \u'* t,-~ +v ~)cl.y .~ ~oU+ I rt- ~ to{4 k;~ ~t ; + kll?fd.V--01 k +4e. jbe~it-~I/ \~. to ~h,p rt~ ?\t3yI/1! r~\. ~ ~.v 0/Wvtl ,'+ 0-t~ Jl ()v\~NV-t C ~Jv ch~ c v1 /' .r-)t.t-e ~ "S' C('-'1~ I 0v& ~~~. Y~'Vt IS ,rvw ~ ~ ~o/ C~.. ~t ~\/~~~~ . .~v'€J L'-t t\Jov: ~O LifW 6{~v,W? l;-/rC'V~ \ \- /V~ '. I J ~.~ ~\~ ~~ v--TIJU]X ~~ 1--1' Oeue~ ~ _ , ~e. . \ 0 'vtA) .t~~ r ,?ov 06 -to rre'-~I-~ \j.lU& r:le~i {}...; W \ (;L tAND\ \ ~ ~ J ~~.~ ~ ~ .:-v~ f-.;W ld cto 0O~Ie1l ~ '---"" '-- ~ Ii _ ( I . a1 /1 l 0 WYV7~,pV \ ~; ;5 wVvV:&:> (,"'Vl()L~--7 ,~ <IfYO~~ ~v~d.. &-f; ex ~'?()~~ + '(i6Jclj" o~ce I ~t 9h~c.J v~ f ~+- ~ .s\~ ro~ ~l, ~ ow 7(fe . _ _~ ~'.'U.rt /-:J l tr:~'1iu . f#/i . $/W2 . tw<J, \ '" ("Vck~~~ rw)~J;0 J4cch 10 if!'.} '.~!A &G,/7 e ( 0 ~ D()\J v{: e _ f / ,:) ~ QpCA> ~,~ , " "- "--, "-- 'l'RACKING LOG - BI'j'E PLAN RKVIEW BUBMI'f'l'AL PRuJI::C'l' 'l'l'l'LE: QUANTUM PARK (peripheral lJl::l:iCRIP'l'10N: MA.JOR SITE PLAN MOD. TVPE: NEW SITE PLAN DATE REC'D: AMOUNT: greenbelt & modified FILE NO.: MSPM 96-007 peD sign pgm) MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION kECKIPT NO. : * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TWELVE (12) SETS SUBMITTED: COLORED ELEVATIONS REC'O: (Plans shall be pre-assembled. The Planning & Zoning Dept. will number each sheet of their set. The P1anniIlg Dept. set will be used to check the remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match.) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * APPLICATION & SUBMITTAL: DATE: ACCEPTED DENIED DATE: DATE OF LET'fER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES: 2nd SUBMIT'I'AL ACCEPTED DENIED DATE: DATE: DATE UF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER: REVIEWER'S NAME: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * # (Label TRC uepartments on each set of plans) DATE AND MEMO NUMBER OF MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW. DATE SEN'l': 10/8/96 RETUkN DATE: 10/16/96 MI::MO NUMBER: 96-523 1st REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANS PLANS Planning Buildina.I ~ Enginee~ -/-- Engineer J:~orestel~ V ~ '1 MEMO # / DA'l'E C;~ - ~"B / /oPfl'i6 / ~H< ' (fFf / 101 :-SO / 9G-q17 /-jO(11.f / "c" / --S- /- /e/ /- /v util. P.W. Parks Ii'ire Police ~YP~ OF VARIANC~(S) DATE OE' MEETING: DATE OF LETT~R SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS: (Aesthetic Review APP., dates of board mtgs. & checklist sent out w/ comments NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID: DATE 12 COMPLETE SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW: (Must be assembled. Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents) COLORBD BLBVATION8 RBC' D I MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM 2nd REVIEW. DATE SENT: MEMO I: RETURN DATE: 2nd REVIBW RBCOMMENDATION/DENIAL PLAN8 MaMO .. / DATB /"R/D" PLANS MBMO I / DATB /"R/D" Utile / / Planning / / P.w. / / 8uilding I / Parks / / Engineer / / Fire / / Engineer / / Police / / Forster / / LETTER TO APPLICANT RBOARDINO TRC APPROVAL/DBNIAL AND LAND DBVBLOPMBNT SIONS PLACED AT THE PROPBRTY OATS SBNT/SIONS INSTALLBD: SCHEDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD ceteRA DA'I'Ii: APPROVAL LE'l'TER SENT: A: 'l'kACKINli. l:iP PROJECT NAME: QUANTUM PARK (PERIPHERAL GREENBELT AND MODIFIED PCD SIGN PROGRAM) CONTACT PERSON: NAME: ROSCOE BIBY, KIMLEY HORN & ASSOC., INC. PHONE: 407-562-7981 FAX: 407-462-9689 TYPE OF APPLICATION: MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION FILE NO: MSPM 96-007 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS DUE: 10/16/% PUBLIC NOTICE: ADMINISTRATIVE TRC MEETING: 10/15/96 TRC MEETING DATE: 10/22/96 RESUBMITT AL DATE: 2ND REVIEW COMMENT DUE: LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS POSTED: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING: 11/12/96 CITY COMMISSION MEETING: 11/19/96 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING: A:PROJECT.FRM . ' To: Fax: From: (\ ~- Date: ~ ,f \ ~\. "'- .. 'J 1~. V' \r ~ . . Pages: \ C\) \...~ \; ,,'0 J \- \'0 ~ \:J From the desk of... Dale S. Sugerman, Assistant Gty Manager Assistant City ManagertDirector of Human Resources . City of Boynton Beach I 00 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach. Florida 33425-031 0 561-375-60 I 0/6275 Fax: 561-375-60 II /6274 Jim Willard, Esq. 407 -425-83 I 6 Dale S. Sugerman, Assistant City Manager Director of Human Resource3s November 8, 1996 Nine, including cover sheet. Jim - Here are the comments from the October 29, 1996 TRC meeting. Please be advised that these were: DRAFT INTERIM COMMENTS NOT FINAL NOT FOR FINAL USE As I mentioned to you over the telephone, the final comments should be out by the end of the day today, and I will have a copy forwarded to you as quickly as possible. Hope that this material is helpful. Jv DR AFT No..,. FOR. F ,~L lJ~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-568 TO: Tambri J. Heyden, AICP Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Michael E. Haag Current Planning Coordinator DATE: October 29,1996 SUBJECT: Major site plan modification - 1 st Review Project: Quantum Park (sign program & greenbelt landscaping) Location: Quantum Park ~~~~~nt: Kirnley Horn & Associates, Inc. 1)lTl2 t M File No.: M8PM 96-007 , CD t-I HIi""~ The following is a list of comments and recommendations regarding the review of the above-referenced project. All comments and recommendations ca be rectified on the plans at time of permitting if the site plan request is approved. The' Planning and Zoning Department staff believe the recommendations identified below will enhance the proposed development. The applicant shall understand that all documents and plans submitted for site plan review and building permits are subject to additional comments. I recommend that theapplicantlagent contact me regarding questions related to the comments. If the applicant is rurt intending to correct code deficiencies and they request that the project remain on the review schedule they should contact me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement. 1. The free standing sign shown on sheet 8-1 at lot 91 is not allowed per the sign code regulations. The requested sign is non-conforming with respect to height (code allows 20 feet vs. proposed 75 feet), area (code allows a maximum of 64 square feet vs. proposed approx. 252 square feet) and sign location (sign is off- premise based on the fact that the Carmax business identified on the sign is not located on the lot where the sign is proposed). Remove the sign from the request. 2. The Planning and Zoning Department would be in favor of adding the free standing sign to the sign program, if the following changes were made to the request: i. the sign face was limited to identifying the Quantum Park name only, the total area of the sign face complied with the sign code area regulations, I the overall height of the sign structures complied with the maximum sign code height of 20 feet and iv. the below listed sign comments are complied with. It should be noted that a 25 percent increase in area and height of the sign, above the code regulations, may be requested from the Board of Zoning Appeals. Contact the Planning and Zoning Department for a variance application to the sign code regulations. ii. iii. For better visibility, it is recommended that the project identification free standing sign be relocated from the east side of lot 91, to the northeast portion of lot 90A. 3. Add to sheet 8-1, the color name, color code, manufacturer and type of material proposed for each member of the free standing sign support structure. z ~ :n l:.. ~ r " . Page 2 Memorandum No. 96-568 Quantum Park sign and landscaping MSPM 96-007 I N7Ek, M COUI1 ENT~ 4. To obtain some uniformity with respect to the approved sign colors and the proposed free standing sign, it is recommended that the color of the perimeter of the proposed sign support structure match the green color that is specified in the current sign program for monument signs located on individual lots. 5. Add to free standing sign drawing found on sheet S-1, the color name, color code, manufacturer and type of material proposed for the sign face, sign panels and sign panel framework. 6. Specify on sheet S-1, whether the free standing sign is back-lit or reverse channel letters. Also indicate on the plan whether the reverse channel letters will be illuminated. It is recommended that the sign face of the free standing sign be illuminated with external lights focused on the sign face. ' 7.. Submit a partial survey of the area around the location of th~ proposed free standing sign. The survey shall idEmtify the location, type and size of all easements of record located within the vicinity of the proposed free standing sign. 8. Add to the submittal an enlarged site plan of the perimeter lot delineating the specific location of the proposed free standing sign. The location of the sign may be identified as a general area, however, the minimum sign code setback of 10 feet from all property lines shall be shown. To ensure that the sign and landscaping structure is not located within an easement, add to the site plan all easements of record in the vicinity of the sign. Adjust the location of the sign structure and landscaping accordingly. Also, add the following note to sheet S-1: If the sign and sign landscaping are placed within an easement written authorization approving the location of the sign and landscaping will be submitted, with the sign permit application, from all utility companies that have rights to occupy the easement(s). . 9. Add to the site plan, th,e foundation landscaping that is required around the base of the free standing sign. The following landscaping is recommended for the base of a free standing sign: six, 10 gallon native multi-trunk shrubs and twenty- five, 3 gallon native hedges. spot planted around the base of the sign structure. All plants shall be placed within a s.ign easement. Also add the following landscape notes to the plan: i. All landscape material shall be Florida #1 or better, ii. installed in a sound workman like manner and ii. irrigated with an automatic water supply system. The recommended landscaping is in addition to the required peripheral greenbelt landscaping. 10. The following landscaping is recommended, if the requested free standing sign is approved: four, 12 foot tall large canopy native trees; twelve, 10 gallon native multi-trunk shrubs and twenty-five, 3 gallon native hedges be spot planted around the base of the sign structure. All plants shall be placed within a sign easement. Also add the following landscape notes to the plan: i. All landscape material shall be Florida #1 or better, ii. installed in a sound workman like manner and ii. irrigated with an automatic water supply system. The recommended landscaping is in addition to the required peripheral greenbelt landscaping. 11. It is recommended that a legal description be prepared that identifies a sign easement for the free standing sign. The sign easement shall include a 12 foot 10 ~ -\ :z ~ .,. ~ ~ . . Page 3 Memorandum No. 96-568 Quantum Park sign and landscaping MSPM 96-007 /WER-tM Co H f.1 tA>fS wide access to the sign from a dedicated public or private road and include sufficient area around the sign structure to allow for installation, repair and maintenance of the structure and landscape material. The legal description of the sign easement shall be dedicated to the Quantum Park Association for . perpetual maintenance of the sign and landscaping located within the easement. A copy of the recorded easement shall be submitted with the permit application for the free standing sign. 12. The wall structure and walls signs shown on sheet S-2 are not allowed per the zoning code and sign code regulations. The requested wall signs are non- d conforming with respect to height (zoning code allows a maximum wall height of 6 feet for walls located outside of the buildable area vs. proposed 9.5 foot tall walls - no setback dimensions were identified to show the location of the wall structures with respect to the builtalble area), area (code allows a maximum of 64 ~ square feet vs. proposed approx. 225 square feet) and sign !ocation (sign is off- premise based on the fact that the Carmax business identified on both of the wall .... signs is not located on the lot where the signs are proposed). Remove both wall --\ structure/signs from the request. 13. The Planning and Zoning Department would be in favor of adding both wall structure/signs to the sign program if the following changes were made to the req uest: i. both of the proposed wall signs were limited to a sign face that identified the Quantum Park project name only, ii. the total area of the sign face on each structure complied with the sign code area regulations, iii. the overall height of the sign structures complied with the zoning code maximum height regulation of 6 feet if the sign is located outside the buildable area. If the location of the sign structure is within the buildable area the requ~sted height would be acceptable % and iv. the belov,l listed sign comments are complied with. ~ It should be noted that a 25 percent increase in area of the sign above the code regulations may be requested through a Board of Zoning Appeals variance application. A request to increase the wall height above 6 feet may also be ~ requested through a Board of Zoning Appeals variance request. Contact the Planning and Zoning Department for a variance application. 14. Add to sheet S-2, the color name, color code, manufacturer and type of material proposed for each member of both wall structures that support the monument :n signage depicted on the submitted plans. 15. To obtain uniformity with respect to the approved sign colors and the proposed ~ wall signs, it is recommended that the green color currently approved for the ,... background of the individual lot monument signs be added to the wall structure trim such as; the end columns and the diamond shaped feature located at the c:: center of the wall. 16. Submit a partial survey of the of the area around the location of each of the ~ ~ proposed wall sign structures. Th~ survey shall identify the location, type and size of all easements of record in t 1e vicinity of the proposed wall sign structures. 17. Add to the submittal an enlarged site plan of each lot where the wall signs are proposed. The site plan shall delideate the specific location of the proposed wall structure/signs. The location of the sign may be identified as a general area, however, the minimum sign code setback of ten (10) feet from all property lines Page 4 Memorandum No. 96-568 Quantum Park sign and landscaping MSPM 96-007 D{2A-FT ~OHHEAJTS shall be shown. Add to each site plan of each wall sign the 25 foot on-site line of sight triangle, required by the zoning code, that shows the area that is required to be kept clear and unobstructed to allow cross visibility where the wall signage is located at the corner of a corner lot. Also, add to the plan the 35 foot on-site line of sight triangle, required by the landscape code, that shows the area that is required to be kept clear and unobstructed between 30 inches and 6 feet to allow cross visibility through landscaping material that is located at the corner of a corner lot. To ensure that the sign structures are not located within an easement add to the site plan all easements of record located within the vicinity of both wall structures. Adjust the location of the walls sign structures and landscaping accordingly. Also, add the following note to sheet 8-2: If the sign and sign landscaping is placed within an easement written authorization approving the location of the sign and landscaping will be submitted, with the sign permit application, from all utility companies that have rights to occupy the easement(s). 18. It is recommended that a legal description be prepared that identifies a sign easement for each wall sign structure. The sign easements shall include an access to the sign from a dedicated public or private road and include sufficient area around the sign structures to allow for installation, repair and maintenance of the structure and landscaping. The legal description of the sign easements shall be dedicated to the Quantum Park Association for perpetual maintenance of the sign structure and landscaping located within the easement. A copy of the recorded easement shall be submitted with the permit application for each wall sign structure. 19. Add to the site plan the foundation landscaping that is required around the base of each wall sign. It is recommended that a five (5) foot wide bed of native flowering plants be installed at twelve inch centers around the entire sign structure at both locations. It is further recommended that more than one specie of material be used. All plants shall be placed within the sign easement. Also add the following landscape notes to the plan: , i. All landscape material shall be Florida #1 or better, ii. installed in a sound workman like manner and ii. irrigated with an automatic water supply system. 20. It is recommended that the design (letter style)and color of the recommended Quantum project name signage for both wall signs and the free standing sign match. It is further recommended that both wall signs be back-lit rather than internally illuminated. 21. To enhance the signage for the entire Quantum project, it is recommended that the plans be modified to show the recommended wall signage on lots located at the west entrance to the project adjacent to Gateway Boulevard. I 22. Prior to the request being presented to the Planning and Development Board on November 12, 1996 and the City Commission on November 19, 1996 a completed site plan review application and the appropriate fee shall be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department no later than 5:00 P.M., November 4, 1996. 23. Prior to the request being presented to the Planning and Development Board on November 12, 1996 the following shall be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department no later than 5:00 pm, November 4, 1996: one (1) copy (not mounted) of the elevations of all sides of each sign z ~ ~ 70 11 i I' c "" ~ Page 5 Memorandum No. 96-568 Quantum Park sign and landscaping MSPM 96-007 J N-rtrt'w\ C OMt-\~T~ structure including sign face. The elevation view drawings shall be colored to match the colors referenced on the elevation view drawings of the signage. Also provide samples of each proposed color. The samples shall identify the color name, color code and manufacturer (minimum size 2" by 2"). [LDS, Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review, Section 7.D.] 24. Add to sheet 81 a distinguishable symbol that represents the perimeter of the Quantum Park PID. 25. Amend sheet 81 to show and identify the zoning classifications that abut the subject PID properties. ' , 26. Indicate on sheet 81, in note form, that the Comprehensive Plan states the land located west of lot 83 is designated for a planned industrial development zoning Classification and the peripheral greenbelt for the Quantum P!D in this area shall be 25 feet wide rather than 40 feet. 27. Omit from sheet 81, the 0 foot wide and 5 foot wide buffer symbol from the legend and plans, and replace with either a 25 foot wide buffer required where the subject property abuts a commercial, or industrial zoned property, or a 40 foot wide buffer where the subject property abuts a residential zoned property. The only exception to implementing the greenbelt buffer requirements would be the lots that are covered by an existing environmental requirement. As discussed at the October 29,1996 TRC meeting, it is recommended that the applicant contact the city's environmentalist/forester, Kevin Hallahan, to determine which lots fall in this category. Once the lot or lots that are enviromentallly protected have been delineated and verified by the forester, indicate them in note form on sheet 81. However, the required size peripheral greenbelt shall be shown and identified on sheet 81 for all perimeter lots. A reduction in the width of the required peripheral greenbelt requires approval of a 80ard of Zoning Appeals variance application. Variance applications are available at the Planning and Zoning Department. 28. Add to the lots that are identified on sheet 81 as "indicates parcel not included" a distinguishable symbol and dimension that identifies the appropriate width buffer, 25 foot wide or 40 foot wide. Also indicate on sheet 81, in note form, at lot 90A that the 80ard of Adjustment on April 17, 1995 granted approval of case #204 to reduce the required 40 foot wide peripheral greenbelt along the east property line to 0 feet. To clarify the areas shown on sheet 81 as "indicates parcel not included" it is recommended that the following note be added to the phrase indicates parcel not included; peripheral greenbelt landscaping for these areas is shown on the individual site plans.. 29. Omit the symbol that represents "indicates parcel not included" found on lot 88 and show in its place the proper location and size peripheral greenbelt. Lot 89A is developed and the symbol and note would apply to that lot. Also omit the symbol from the east half of lot 468 and 47C this portion of the site is not developed and should be included with the proposed buffer plan. 30. Add the following general landscape notes to sheet 81: i. All plant material shall be graded Florida #1 or better as described in the ii. All landscape material shall be installed in a sound workman like manner. iii. All landscape material shall be irrigated with an automatic water supply system. e) f: ~ z ~ ~ :n $ r- <a (V1 - 1 Page 6 Memorandum No. 96-568 Quantum Park sign and landscaping MSPM 96-007 } ~TUl.M COHHt~7S 31. Submit a survey of each perimeter lot shown on sheet B1. The survey shall include the location, type and size of all easements of record. Place a note on Sheet B 1 indicating that written approval from all utility users and outside agencies that have rights to the Quantum lots, shall be submitted with a permit application to install the buffer landscaping. Considering that the applicant is requesting the buffer plan be implemented on a lot by lot bases and staffs objective is to produce a uniform buffer around the project, it is recommended that written authorization from all parties (utility users and outside agencies) granting approval to install all landscape material as shown on the approved site plan be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department prior to the proposed buffer being implemented on any perimeter lot. Following approval of the approved landscaping from all utility users and outside agen~ies, it is recommended that a landscape easement be dedicated on each lot for the required peripheral greenbelt landscaping. The legal description of the landscape easements shall be dedicated to the Quantum Pa,rk Association for perpetual maintenance of the land~;caping and irrigation located within the easement. A copy of the recorded easement shall be submitted with the permit application for the installation of thf:\ landscaping. 32. To ensure that the buffer is uniform around the project, It is recommended that If the utility companies and outside agencies do not approve of the landscape material as specified on the subject approved site plan, the applicant will submit for a new site plan approval for peripheral greenbelt landscaping. The new site plan shall show the landscaping that each utility user and outside agency will allow to be planted within the required peripheral greenbelt area. If the proper buffer is not obtained with the plan that the outside agencies and utility users approve, the new submittal may require additional land, within each lot, to be qedicated for sufficient area to install the peripheral greenbelt landscaping. The additional area for the greenbelt landscape easement will be an area that is not encumbered by any easements. 33. It is recommended that the approved perimeter greenbelt landscaping be installed on a perimeter lot by lot bases. Building improvements, on a perimeter lot, will not receive a certificate of occupancy until the approved perimeter landscaping permit is finialed or the approved perimeter landscaping material is installed as part of the building permit for the perimeter lot. 34. It is recommended that on sheet B:2 (25 foot wide buffer) the spacing of the Date Palms be shown and dimensioned at a maximum spacing of 50 foot center to center. 35. Specify on sheet B2 the quantity, size and spacing of ground cover, medium shrub and medium shrub (with medium texture) landscape material. It is recommended that the required 25 foot wide buffer area be indicated with a typical fifty foot long section. The typical plan view section drawing shall include a width and length dimension of the buffer. The drawing shall also include a labeled symbol that represent the location and specie of lawn grass, ground cover, shrub, hedge, tree and palm landscape material. Accompanying the plan view drawing shall be a plant .Iist that identifies the common and botanical name of the plants with a specific symbol representing the native species. The plant list shall also indicate height, spacing and quantity of material including any other planting specifications necessary to identify the plant. The minimum code requirement for tree or palm height is 8 feet and the minimum hedge height is 18 inches at time of planting. The code requirement for minimum spacing for hedge material is two feet center to center. The recommended minimum spacing for ground cover is twelve inches cent,sr to center and the recommended size d 10 ~ .., -' z. ~ ~ :n ~ c (p r" .' Page 8 Memorandum No. 96-568 Quantum Park sign and landscaping MSPM 96-007 J ~rnR.. W\ Co H t-I'A>~ transparencies of the site plan, showing the location of all proposed signs and peripheral greenbelt landscaping as depicted on the submitted plans. Also, include transparencies of the elevations views of both wall signs and the free standing sign. 36. For the presentation of the project to the Planning and Development Board and City Commission, submit to the Planning and Zoning Department no later than 5:00 P.M., November 4,1996 the following: Considering that the request includes improvements around the perimeter of the Quantum project, it is recommended that rather than having the applicant provide four (4) inch by six (6) inch photographs of the adjacent properties to evaluate the proposed improvements to the existing conditions of the adjacent properties, the applicant is requested to provide no less than eight (8) aerial photographs of the perim~ter of the project that include the adjacent properties. Place a symbol on the photograph that identifies the perimeter of the Quantum project and attach to each picture a reduced key map that correlates the photograph to the plan view drawing of the project. 37, The content of the site plan drawings and the permit plans are subject to compliance with all applicable city code of ordinances. It is the applicant's responsibility to show compliance. Additional comments may be generated following the review of subsequent submitted plans. 38. If recommendations are approved by the City Commission, incorporate them into the working drawings required for permits for the project. 39. It has been determined that this request will require one review of the submitted plans prior to the request being forwarded to the Planning and Development Board and City Commission. Considering that the objective of providing a peripheral greenbelt landscaping and project identification signage is to create uniformity and that each site greenbelt landscaping will be installed on a lot by lot bases, it is recommended that a second submittal showing compliance with conditions of approval granted for the request by the City Commission be made prior to a permit request being submitted to install the approved peripheral greenbelt landscaping or approved signs. It is further recommended that the conditions of approval be depicted on three (3) copies of the corrected site plan request and that the three copies be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department for unconditional sign-off by the TRC members or their designated representative. MEH:dim xc: Central File D:\SHARE\WP\PROJECTS\QUANTUM\MSPM\STFCOM1.WPD tJ 10 ~ 1:\ --\ ~ --\ ~ ~ ~ ~ c- - ~ Page 7 Memorandum No. 96-568 Quantum Park sign and landscaping MSPM 96-007 / Nllft, W\ CO..I-tI"~ 34. specification for ground cover material is one gallon. The recommended minimum spacing for medium shrub (with medium texture) is 1 0 gallon and the recommended minimum spacing for the medium shrub is five feet center to center. Amend the plans accordingly. The design of the 25 foot wide peripheral greenbelt is acceptable, however, the greenbelt area and landscaping shall be in addition to existing viable native landscaping, other code requirements including the vehicle use area landscape area and material screening required by the ~ landscape code, which includes: a5 foot wide landscape strip along a right-of- way. The 5 foot wide landscaped area is to include; trees 40 foot on center (8 foot tall at time of planting) and a continuous hedge (18 inches tall at time of planting and spaced 2 foot on center). Vehicle use area screening is also ~ required along interior property lines the interior property Iin~ screening consists of a 2.5 foot wide landscape strip and a continuous hedge (18 inches tall at time of planting and spaced 2 foot on center). A site plan for each perimeter lot will be added to the submittal. The individual site plans will indiqate with a distinguishable symbol the location and size of the required peripheral greenbelt and all easements of record. Specify on the lower portion of sheet B3 the quantity and spacing of low ground cover, medium/tall shrub, accent tree, canopy tree and palm tree landscape material. It is recommended that the required 40 foot wide buffer area be indicated with a typical one hundred foot long section. The typical plan view section drawing shall include a width and length dimension of the buffer. The drawing shall also include a labeled symbols that represent the location and specie of lawn grass, ground cover, shrub, hedge, accent tree, canopy tree and palm landscape material. Accompanying the plan view drawing shall be a plant list that identifies the common and botanical name of the plants with a specific symbol representing the native species. The plant list shall also indicate height, spacing, quantity of material and any other plant specification necessary to identify the plant. The minimum tree or palm height is 8 feet and the minimum hedge height is 18 inches at time of planting. The minimum spacing for hedge material is two feet center to center. The recommended minimum spacing for ground cover is twelve inches center to center and the recommended minimum size specifications for ground cover is one gallon. The recommended minimum spacing for medium/tall shrub is 10 gallon and the recommended minimum spacing for the medium/tall shrub is five feet center to center. It is further recommended that the accent trees be eight feet tall at planting and the canopy and palm trees be twelve foot tall at time of planting. Amend the plans accordingly. The design of the 40 foot wide peripheral greenbelt is acceptable, however, the greenbelt area and landscaping shall be in addition to existing native landscaping, other code requirements including the vehicle use area landscape area and material screening required by the landscape code, which includes: a 5 foot wide landscape strip along a right-of-way. The 5 foot wide landscaped area is to include; trees 40 foot on center (8 foot tall at time of planting) and a continuous hedge (18 inches tall at time of planting and spaced 2 foot on center). Vehicle use area screening is also required along interior property lines. The interior property line screening consists of a 2.5 foot wide landscape strip and a continuous hedge (18 inches tall at time of planting and spaced 2 foot on center). A site plan for each perimeter lot will be added to the submittal. The individual site plans will indicate with a distinguishable symbol the location and size of the required peripheral greenbelt and all easements of record. 35. For the presentation of the project to the Planning and Development Board and City Commission, submit to the Planning and Zoning Department no later than 5:00 P.M., November 4,1996; eight and one-half (8 1/2) inch by eleven (11) inch f ~ l' ~ c. V>> ~ ,.- t...lSMISSIrw VERIFICATION REPORT TIME 11/88/1996 15:33 NAME FAX 4873756811 TEL DATE. TIME FAX NO. /NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 11/88 15:25 814074258316 88:87:23 09 OK STANDARD .1.J.I..!...l:;-9~<"...I.:1VlE.N..L" 0.1.... DEVE:I:..C>PMEN"r I TILr--':NG DIVIS ON 100 B. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, Fl 33435 Phone: (407) 375-63 PLANS REVIEW COMMENTS Name of Reviewer ~\\.4 Z ~ Type of Review Date of Review 1st Review 2nd Review Permit # proj ect c:::A.....te:- ~ ~ . Contractor Other Your permit application and supporting documentation do not comply with t City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances as described below (see attact sheets if applicable). Please correct documents to comply with the commer and resubmit two (2) corrected sets of plans to the Building Divisic Direct any questions to the reviewer named above. If a conference with t reviewer is necessary, an appointment is recommended. To expedite t process, changes may be made to the permit documents at the Building Oivisi by the applicant or his agent. (Proof of authorization is required of anyc other than the design professional prior to making change~ to signed 0 sealed documents). Timely approval of your project is dependent upon yc prompt response to the comments. ~ ~\H~ ~~ l)~'eSL CPH~JcJ2~L- \.)€Ie.)-~~(~"\'Al- 'v\~tc.,:t~, ~,Ac:~9. \) H~. ()",-''''o~/' ~~k:>~l)..9G> 0' lI-'DOUMb-*' ~ A.~Q' 'tVt'I--L ~ F€Ot'~ '"to ~'E.- __ It\kJC. 0 ~ &4 \'b ~ ooT- HDr&: ~ ZO ( K l4 , ..... ~~~~ '7 \"'~V'(P.'0 Q~l-\ ~~ 9\W . '2-)~~~.~~ KxL-~L~,.:) \~ ~M-'.\D"><"7-::::,?-\l.Z,c; L :. "'?~ 96ct. 7~ tt' 7) 'V\'e:f::C/-t\OCA<- 0t:?0 t;i?+WJ-. ~ ~~ <\- 0/ ID~ ~ q f"-etT l0 ~ \:-' I-"\~. O~ ~ <7l~ ~ .LD\-. ( Q-\ ') ( \) - z..") - - ..'~ '?~~ ~) ~~lW\t\ ~\~ - ~ At7t'~ \0 ~S ~lG:<O Wt'~ lY\k::'--\ v ") Ti) $Q..V ~t~k.)- ~O\ A~k:fj~ \P ~~~ ~\ ~o woe:: (\~ '?- ') (,) UJ~iw'\l(jC) <;'llbO - ~o*' ~'QD~ \0 -\:"~ ~\G?t0 WOC; C $-<0 ') ~\~""~"-( GL~"( t)~~ ~ ~~~ ~tw \2-)(,IO\I02-} \71, \)~ J \7r;;, \;)0 ~ LO~ (JV -\:'-\~ ~~ . ~~9\~ ~~ ,4.Vl~ ~ ceo~~ w/6<UAPtUM ~t~ ~~ ~ coc..oe.. . ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ \0 *~ ylk" ,?~~<<l-1 ************************************************************************ Applicant's Comments rec'd. by: Comment phone # Name (print): only___ Date called & caller's (signature): Plans & initials: 1st Date comment 2nd _ _____. 3 rd ________ RECREATION & PARK DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-479 revised r~ rn@rnnw~ OCT 3 0 I99i PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director Kevin J. HaBahan, Forester! Environmentalist f(. ~ ~ DATE: October 30, 1996 FROM: SUBJECT: Quantum Park (peripheral greenbelt and modified peD sign program) 1 st Review- Major Site Plan Modification The applicant should indicate how all existing desirable vegetation including trees will be used in the buffer plantings.(see comment number 4 ) Recommendations: The landscape materials should be placed entirely on properties owned by Quantum Park. rt... ,~ ~}ti!l..... ",",oS I .The appropriate agency (South Florida Water Management District, Lake Worth Water Management District, Florida Power and Light) should review the landscape buffer plans to make sure the vegetation meets the criteria of each agency, if the vegetation is planted within their easements. The maintenance of the landscape buffers including irrigation should be the responsibility of the Quantum Park Association, rather than the individual lot owners. The peripheral greenbelt plan should include all existing native, desirable vegetation and treesJ . ent should be placed on the plan. . exotic ve~;~n should be removedfr;. pa 0 theplan._ ~ CKj>~ _ . f di>:f c,Jvv-1~ / The project should continue i the normal review process. ~ . ~ {- ? V; ~ . hJ:; ~c~'-_ CL.r ,rf/ Itt Py(;tJ; i(/ Y /uAj'h / J-" D,D ~ Va / tY /~7t/ .~ -( r/i~ ~I-j' ~ ,v - qw" \ ~(' ~~~lJ ~, ': 'J 1 D ~-e. (~ f ~tV~ hi {ef ~ Jr' 0~~". ~.(i~.~ {.~_ 5~If~v~t-_:!/ 00 , I~'" RECREATION & PARK DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-479 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/ Environmentalist 'f< ~ H DATE: October 14, 1996 ill Roomo" m lJl~ I j 4 ~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. SUBJECT: Quantum Park (peripheral greenbelt and modified PCD sign program) 1 st Review- Major Site Plan Modification The applicant should indicate how all existing desirable vegetation including trees will be used in the buffer plantings. Recommendations: 1. The landscape materials should be placed entirely on properties owned by Quantum Park. 2.The appropriate agency (South Florida Water Management District, Lake Worth Water Management District, Florida Power and Light) should review the landscape buffer plans to make sure the vegetation meets the criteria of each agency, if the vegetation is planted within their easements. 3. The maintenance of the landscape buffers including irrigation should be the responsibility of the Quantum Park Association, rather than the indiv' ual lot owners. The project should continue in the normal review process. kjh < ~ -{/J tu / \~~~ ~VI bt . f ~h(Jo ~~ x% ~?f0 - ~< eJ~ ~ (J)J I - 6' ,f' #: r~l11 r)J CY ~ \{.; /:.,.. ---'/' / ~//' RECREATION & PARK DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-479 revised ill l5J~rnuw~ OCT 3 0 .. ~1 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/ Environmentalist ~ ~ tt- DATE: October 30, 1996 FROM: SUBJECT: Quantum Park (peripheral greenbelt and modified PCD sign program) 1 st Review- Major Site Plan Modification The applicant should indicate how all existing desirable vegetation including trees will be used in the buffer plantings.(see comment number 4 ) Recommendations: ill The landscape materials should be placed entirely on properties owned by Quantum Park. ~j- t=~ ,K. J!. ,//'/'7(.... :>~~ """"~r -;I.. 2. The appropriate agency (South Florida Water Management District, Lake Worth Water Management District, Florida Power and Light) should review the landscape buffer plans to make sure the vegetation meets the criteria of each agency, if the vegetation is planted within their easements..AlI'o/"~ t2/(,<ff' 01- w/.<j' "!IV ,; JJ/~ ;f~ fJD06D r~"- \. /.I. '/ 3. The maintenance of the landscape buffers including irrigation should be the responsibility of the Quantum Park Association, rather than the individual lot owners. 4. The peripheral greenbelt plan should include all existing native, desirable vegetation and trees. This comment should be placed on the plan. All exotic vegetation should be removed from the peripheral greenbelt as part of the plan. The project should continue in the normal review process. kjh RECREATION & PARK DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-479 ~ uc r f . . PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/ Environmentalist ,}< ~ ~ DATE: October 14, 1996 SUBJECT: Quantum Park (peripheral greenbelt and modified peD sign program) 1 st Review- Major Site Plan Modification The applicant should indicate how all existing desirable vegetation including trees will be used in the buffer plantings. Recommendations: 1. The landscape materials should be placed entirely on properties owned by Quantum Park. 2.The appropriate agency (South Florida Water Management District, Lake Worth Water Management District, Florida Power and Light) should review the landscape buffer plans to make sure the vegetation meets the criteria of each agency, if the vegetation is planted within their easements. 3.The maintenance of the landscape buffers including irrigation should be the responsibility of the Quantum Park Association, rather than the individual lot owners. The project should continue in the normal review process. kjh 1Iffi- Alf;(f1O .~I) ;01Jt7ht A-v I ) Goo IVl '56"= DEP ARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-099 W 19 @ IH \'If ~ Iiil uU OCT 3 0 - l!Ji I PZtANNING AND ONING DEPT. October 30, 1996 RE: Tambri Heyden Planning and Zoning Director f.,rJ~~. Hukill, P .E. ~VIjJlOt. of Development QUANTUM - SIGN PROGRAM MODIFICATIONS TO: FROM: We have reviewed subject proposal and have the following comments: 1. The proposed 75' pylon sign is 55 feet taller than the 20 feet permitted by the LDR. Chap. 21, Art. IV, Sec. 2, par. A, pg. 21-15 and Chap. 21, Art. IV, Sec. 2, par. B, pg. 21-16. 2. The proposed pylon sign is an off-premise sign by virtue of the multiple advertisers and is therefore prohibited. Chap. 21, Art. II, Sec. 3, par. T, pg. 21-8. 3. The proposed entrance wall sign identified multiple off-premises users, and is therefore prohibited. Chap. 21, Art. II, Sec. 3, par. T, pg. 21-8. 4. The proposed pylon sign is approximately three times larger than maximum permissible 64 sq. ft. Chap. 21, Art. IV, Sec. 2, par. B, pg. 21-16. Most of these requirements cannot be granted variances because they do not fall under specific conditions by which variances can be considered. Chap. 21, Art. II, Sec. 1, pg. 21-5. WVH:bg XC: Anthony Occhiuzzo, Building Code Permit Administrator James G. Willard, Esq., Shutts & Bowen, 20 N. Orange Ave., Ste. 1000, Orlando 32801 C:\ WPWIN60\ WPDOCS\ TRC\QUANTUM.WPD ~'88 f;,--", rp) f? f I ~~ ~ 0 ~~L :; UU OCT 3 0 j59) ~----:-:--~ " ~i Board of Supervisors C. Stanley weaver Kermit Dell John I. Whitworth III SecretarylManager William G. Winters Assistant Manager Richard S. Wheellhan Attorney Perry & Schone, P.A. LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT ~^'-^~^-...../ October 28, 13081 MILITARY TRAIL DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33484 Tambri J. Heyden, AICP Director Planning and Zoning City of Boynton Beach P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 N{-'~ /i1-/k Dear Ms. Heyden: Subject: Technical Review Committee Agenda The Lake Worth Drainage District offers the following comments regarding the item( s) on the October 29, 1996 meeting agenda: 1. Quantum Park - Peripheral Greenbelt and Modified PID Si&n Pro&ram - No objection. No need for drainage review. 2. Carmax - Lots 77, 78, 89 and 80 - Quantum Park - Parking Lot Variance and New Application for Environmental Permit. No objection on both items. No need for drainage review. As always, we thank you for being given the opportunity to comment. Sincerely, ~~~NAGEDISTRICT Shaughn J. Webb Chief Inspector SJW /mfb c: Ronald L. Crone, P.E., P.L.S., Assistant Manager, L WDD Patrick A. Martin, P.E., District Engineer, LWDD Delray Beach & Boca Raton 498-5363 . Boynton Beach & West Palm Beach 737-3835 . FAX (407) 495-9694 ~.." 'v {\?( , fl .., ~~' ( i " .J '. (~-: \ "II BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-443 October 28, 1996 To: William V. Hukill, P.E., Development Director From: Anthony F. Occhiuzzo, Building Code Permit Administrator AI Newbold, Deputy Development Directo~ Quantum Park - Major Site Plan Modification Sign Program Via: Re: Based upon review of the proposed modification to the present sign program for Quantum Park, the following comments are offered: 1. The proposed pylon sign contains several deficiencies to our sign code with respect to signage permitted in industrial districts. Those deficiencies are as follows: . i ' J a. The height allowed is twenty feet; the proposed pylon is seventy- five feet high. 1\ ~}~. b. The proposed pylon suggests several "advertisers" which makes the sign both off-premise and billboard. Those type signs are not permitted in an industrial zone. 2. As proposed, the entrance wall signage, does not identify the property but rather one of its occupants. Such signage would be considered off-premise signage and, therefore, disallowed in any zoning district. Ill. f\~r.,v ~ In reading the sign code, a sign program is intended to provide for signage continuity and control for atheistic purposes, not a vehicle to promote drastic departures from our standards as this application appears to propose. AFO:mh Attachment: Plans c:\ WPWIN60\ WPDOCS\TROQUANTUM.WPD ~rn lJl) 1 OCT? 5 1996 ~ 0 WI m FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-313 TO: Tambri Heyden, Director Planning & Zoning Department .4Vt1r!a,,~lLa<LI C FROM: William D. Cavanaugh, FPO I Fire Department DATE: October 25, 1996 RE: MSPM 96-007 Quantum Park Peripheral Green Belt & Modified Sign Program Operationally we have no objections to this proposal. Aesthetically, seventy five feet (75') high signs do not fit in with previous city proposals. cc: Deputy Chief Ness FPO II Campbell File 00 mowrn @ cr 2 5 1996 RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #96-495 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director John Wildner, Parks Superintendent ItJ Quantum I FROM: RE: DATE: October 25, 1996 The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the plans for Quantum. There are no recreation related comments. The project may continue through the normal review process. JW:ad PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-568 TO: Tambri J. Heyden, AICP Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Michael E. Haag Current Planning Coordinator DATE: October 25, 1996 SUBJECT: Major site plan modification - 1 st Review Project: Quantum Park (sign program & greenbelt landscaping) Location: Quantum Park AgenU Applicant: Kimley Horn & Associates, Inc. File No.: MSPM 96-007 The following is a list of comments and recommendations regarding the review of the above-referenced project. All comments and recommendations ca be rectified on the plans at time of permitting if the site plan request is approved. The Planning and Zoning Department staff believe the recommendations identified below will enhance the proposed development. The applicant shall understand that all documents and plans submitted for site plan review and building permits are subject to additional comments. I recommend that the applicanUagent contact me regarding questions related to the comments. If the applicant is not intending to correct code deficiencies and they request that the project remain on the review schedule they should contact me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement. 1. Add to sheet S-1 the color name, color code, manufacturer and type of material proposed for each member of the free standing sign support structure. 2. To obtain some uniformity with respect to the approved sign colors and the proposed free standing sign, it is recommended that the color of the perimeter of the proposed sign support structure match the green color that is specified in the current sign program for monument signs located on individual lots. 3. Add to sheet S-1 the color name, color code, manufacturer and type of material proposed for the sign face, sign panels and sign panel framework for the free standing sign. 4. Specify on sheet S-1 which of the sign panels will be illuminated. 5. Amend the plans to show the area and height of the free standing sign consistent with the area and height specifications identified in the sign code regulations. 6. Submit a partial survey of the area around the location of the proposed free standing sign. The survey shall identify the location, type and size of all easements of record located within the vicinity of the proposed free standing sign. 7. Add to the key map found on sheet S-1 or add to the submittal an enlarged site plan delineating the specific location of the proposed free standing sign. The location of the sign maybe identified as a general area however, the minimum sign code setback of 10 feet from all property lines shall be shown. To ensure that the sign structure is not located within an easement, add to the site plan all easements of record in the vicinity of the sign. Also, add the following note to Page 2 Memorandum No. 96-568 Quantum Park sign and landscaping MSPM 96-007 sheet S-1: Written authorization, approving the location of the sign, from all utility companies that have rights to occupy the easement(s) shall be submitted with the sign permit application for the free standing sign. 8. Add to the site plan the foundation landscaping that is required around the base of the free standing sign. The following landscaping is recommended if the requested free standing sign is approved: four (4) -12 foot tall large canopy native trees, twelve (12) - 10 gallon native multi-trunk shrubs and twenty-five (25) - 3 gallon native hedges be spot planted around the base of the sign structure. All plants shall be placed within a sign easement. Also add the following landscape notes to the plan: i. All landscape material shall be Florida #1 or better, ii. installed in a sound workman like manner and ii. irrigated with an automatic water supply system. 9. Prepare a legal description that identifies a sign easement for the free standing sign. The sign easement shall include a 12 foot wide access to the sign from a public or private road and include sufficient area around the sign structure to allow for installation, repair and maintenance of the structure and landscape material. The legal description of the sign easement shall be dedicated to the Quantum Park Association for perpetual maintenance of the sign and landscaping located within the easement. A copy of the recorded easement shall be submitted with the permit application for the free standing sign. 10. Add to sheet S-1 the color name, color code, manufacturer and type of material proposed for each member of both wall structures proposed to support the monument signage depicted on the submitted plans. 11. To obtain uniformity with respect to the approved sign colors and the proposed wall signs, it is recommended that the green color currently approved for the background of the individual lot monument signs be added to the wall structure trim such as; the end columns and the diamond shaped feature located at the center of the wall. 12. Submit a partial survey of the of the area around the location of each of the proposed wall sign structures. The survey shall identify the location, type and size of all easements of record in the vicinity of the proposed wall sign structures. 13. Add to sheet S-2, dimensions delineating the specific location of each wall structure on the subject lot. The location of the sign maybe identified as a general area however, the minimum sign code setback of ten (10) feet from all property lines shall be shown. Add to each site plan of the wall signs the 25 foot on-site line of sight triangle that shows the area that is required to be kept clear and unobstructed to allow cross visibility where the subject lot is located abutting an intersection of two rights-of-way. Also, add to the plan the 35 foot on-site line of sight triangle that shows the area that is required to be kept clear and unobstructed between 30 inches and 6 feet to allow cross visibity through landscaping material that is located on a corner lot. To ensure that the sign structures are not located within an easement add to the site plan all easements of record located within the vicinity of both wall structures. Adjust the location of the walls sign structures and landscaping accordingly. Also, add the following note to sheet S-2: Written authorization, approving the location of the wall structure, from all utility companies that have rights to occupy the easement(s) shall be submitted with the sign permit application for the free standing sign. Page 3 Memorandum No. 96-568 Quantum Park sign and landscaping MSPM 96-007 14. Prepare a legal description that identifies a sign easement for each wall sign structure. The sign easements shall include an access to the sign from a public or private road and include sufficient area around the sign structures to allow for installation, repair and maintenance of the structure and landscaping. The legal description of the sign easements shall be dedicated to the Quantum Park Association for perpetual maintenance of the sign structure and landscaping located within the easement. A copy of the recorded easement shall be submitted with the permit application for each wall sign structure. 15. Add to the site plan the foundation landscaping that is required around the base of each wall sign. It is recommended that a five (5) foot wide bed of native flowering plants be installed at twelve inch centers around the entire sign structure at both locations. It is further recommended that more than one specie of material be used. All plants shall be placed within the sign easement. Also add the following landscape notes to the plan: i. All landscape material shall be Florida #1 or better, ii. installed in a sound workman like manner and ii. irrigated with an automatic water supply system. 16. To remove the off-premise classification of the walls signs that are presently depicted on the submitted plans and to unify the proposed site wall signage with the Quantum project it is recommended that the Quantum name be added to the center section of each wall sign structure. It is also, recommended that the design and color of the recommended project name sign match the signage displayed on the proposed free standing sign. It is further recommended that the recommended project identification signage and the two adjacent business signs be back-lit signs rather than internally illuminated. 17. Amend the plans to show the area and height of both wall signs consistent with the area and height specifications identified in the sign code regulations. To clarify the height of the proposed wall sign structures, specify on sheet S-2 the grade elevation of the top of the wall sign structure and the finish grade of the land around the perimeter of the sign structure. Also indicate the finish grade at the center of the Gateway Boulevard and High Ridge Road intersection. 18. To enhance the signage for the entire Quantum project it is recommended that the plans be modified to show the proposed wall signage on lots located at the West entrance to the project adjacent to Gateway Boulevard. 19. Prior to the request being presented to the Planning and Development Board on November 12, 1996 and the City Commission on November 19, 1996 a completed site plan review applications and the appropriate fee shall be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department no later than 5:00 P.M., November 1, 1996. 20. Prior to the request being presented to the Planning and Development Board on November 12, 1996 the following shall be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department no later than 5:00 pm, November 1, 1996: one (1) copy (not mounted) of the elevations of all sides of each sign structure including sign face. The elevation view drawings shall be colored to match the colors referenced on the elevation view drawings. Also provide samples of each proposed color. The samples shall identify the color name, color code and manufacturer (minimum size 2" by 2"). [LOS, Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review, Section 7.0.] Page 4 Memorandum No. 96-568 Quantum Park sign and landscaping MSPM 96-007 21. Add to sheet B1 a distinguishable symbol that represents the perimeter of the Quantum Park PIO. 22. Amend sheet B 1 to show and identify the zoning classifications that abut the subject PIO properties. 23. Indicate on sheet B1, in note form, that the Comprehensive Plan states the land located west of lot 83 is designated for a planned industrial development zoning classification and the peripheral greenbelt for the Quantum PIO in this area shall be 25 feet wide rather than 40 feet. 24. Omit from sheet B1, the 0 foot wide and 5 foot wide buffer symbol from the legend and plans and replace with either a 25 foot wide buffer required where the subject property abuts a commercial or industrial zoned property or a 40 foot wide buffer where the subject property abuts a residential zoned property. A reduction in the width of the required peripheral greenbelt requires approval of a Board of Zoning Appeals variance application. Variance applications are available at the Planning and Zoning Department. 25. Add to the lots that are identified on sheet B1 as "indicates parcel not included" a distinguishable symbol and dimension that identifies the appropriate width buffer, 25 foot wide or 40 foot wide. Also indicate on sheet B1, in note form, at lot 90A that the Board of Adjustment on April 17, 1995 granted approval of case #204 to reduce the required 40 foot wide peripheral greenbelt to 0 feet. To clarify the areas shown on sheet B 1 as "indicates parcel not included" it is recommended that the following note be added to the phrase "indicates parcel not included; peripheral greenbelt landscaping for these areas is shown on the individual site plans. 26. Omit the symbol that represents "indicates parcel not included" found on lot 88 and show in its place the proper location and size peripheral greenbelt. 27. Add the following general landscape notes to sheet B1: I. All plant material shall be graded Florida #1 or better as described in the II. All landscape material shall be installed in a sound workman like manner. iii. All landscape material shall be irrigated with an automatic water supply system. 28. Submit a survey of each perimeter lot shown on sheet B 1. Show and identify on each survey the location, type and size of all easements of record. Place a note on Sheet B1 indicating that written approval from all utility users and outside agencies that have rights to the Quantum lots, shall be submitted at time of permit review for the landscape plans. The written authorization from all parties shall grant approval to install all landscape material as shown on the approved site plan. Following all approvals a landscape easement shall be dedicated on each lot for the required peripheral greenbelt landscaping. The legal description of the landscape easements shall be dedicated to the Quantum Park Association for perpetual maintenance of the landscaping located within the easement. A copy of the recorded easement shall be submitted with the permit application for the installation of the landscaping. 29. If the utility companies and outside agencies do not approve of the landscape Page 5 . Memorandum No. 96-568 Quantum Park sign and landscaping MSPM 96-007 material as specified on the subject approved site plan the applicant will submit for a new site plan approval for peripheral greenbelt landscaping. The new site plan shall show the landscaping that each utility user and outside agency will allow to be planted within the required peripheral greenbelt area. The new submittal may require additional land, within each lot, to be dedicated for peripheral greenbelt landscaping. 30. It is recommended that the approved perimeter greenbelt landscaping be installed on a perimeter lot by lot bases. Building improvements on a perimeter lot will not receive a certificate of occupancy until the approved perimeter landscaping permit is finialed or the approved perimeter landscaping material is installed as part of the building permit for the perimeter lot. 31. On sheet B2 (25 foot wide buffer) show and dimension the Date Palms a maximum spacing of 50 foot center to center. 32. Specify on sheet B2 the quantity, size and spacing of ground cover, medium shrub and medium shrub (with medium texture) landscape material. It is recommended that the required 25 foot wide buffer area be indicated with a typical fifty foot long section. The typical plan view section drawing shall include a width and length dimension of the buffer. The drawing shall also include a labeled symbol that represent the location and specie of lawn grass, ground cover, shrub, hedge, tree and palm landscape material. Accompanying the plan view drawing shall be a plant list that identifies the common and botanical name of the plants with a specific symbol representing the native species. The plant list shall also indicate height, spacing and quantity of material including any other planting specifications necessary to identify the plant. The minimum code requirement for tree or palm height is 8 feet and the minimum hedge or shrub height is 18 inches at time of planting. The code requirement for minimum spacing for hedge or shrub material is two feet center to center. The recommended minimum spacing for ground cover is twelve inches center to center. Amend the plans accordingly. The design of the 25 foot wide peripheral greenbelt is acceptable, however, the greenbelt area and landscaping shall be in addition to other code requirements including the vehicle use area landscape area and material screening required by the landscape code, which includes: a 5 foot wide landscape strip along a right-of-way. The 5 foot wide landscaped area is to include; trees 40 foot on center (8 foot tall at time of planting) and a continuous hedge (18 inches tall at time of planting and spaced 2 foot on center). Vehicle use area screening is also required along interior property lines the interior property line screening consists of a 2.5 foot wide landscape strip and a continuous hedge (18 inches tall at time of planting and spaced 2 foot on center). 33. Specify on the lower portion of sheet B3 the quantity and spacing of low ground cover, medium/tall shrub, accent tree, canopy tree and palm tree landscape material. It is recommended that the required 40 foot wide buffer area be indicated with a typical one hundred foot long section. The typical plan view section drawing shall include a width and length dimension of the buffer. The drawing shall also include a labeled symbols that represent the location and specie of lawn grass, ground cover, shrub, hedge, accent tree, canopy tree and palm landscape material. Accompanying the plan view drawing shall be a plant list that identifies the common and botanical name of the plants with a specific symbol representing the native species. The plant list shall also indicate height, spacing, quantity of material and any other plant specification necessary to identify the plant. The minimum tree or palm height is 8 feet and the minimum Page 6 Memorandum No. 96-568 Quantum Park sign and landscaping MSPM 96-007 hedge or shrub height is 18 inches at time of planting. The minimum spacing for hedge or shrub material is two feet center to center. The recommended minimum spacing for ground cover is twelve inches center to center. Amend the plans accordingly. The design of the 40 foot wide peripheral greenbelt is acceptable, however, the greenbelt area and landscaping shall be in addition to other code requirements including the vehicle use area landscape area and material screening required by the landscape code, which includes: a 5 foot wide landscape strip along a right-of-way. The 5 foot wide landscaped area is to include; trees 40 foot on center (8 foot tall at time of planting) and a continuous hedge (18 inches tall at time of planting and spaced 2 foot on center). Vehicle use area screening is also required along interior property lines the interior property line screening consists of a 2.5 foot wide landscape strip and a continuous hedge (18 inches tall at time of planting and spaced 2 foot on center). 34. For the presentation of the project to the Planning and Development Board and City Commission, submit to the Planning and Zoning Department no later than 5:00 P.M., November 1,1996; eight and one-half (81/2) inch by eleven (11) inch transparencies of the site plan showing the location of all proposed signs and peripheral greenbelt landscaping. Also include transparencies of the elevations views of both the free standing and wall signs. 35. For the presentation of the project to the Planning and Development Board and City Commission, submit to the Planning and Zoning Department no later than 5:00 P.M., November 1, 1996 the following: To compare the architectural design and landscaping of the proposed request to the adjacent properties, the applicant shall submit four (4) inch by six (6) inch colored photographs of the subject site and adjacent properties. The photographs shall be of all four compass directions around the proposed location of the signs. More than one photograph from each side of the property may be required to fully illustrate the existing conditions around the proposed sign locations and proposed peripheral greenbelt landscaping. To delineate what the picture is representing, place a label on the front of the photographs identifying the compass direction with respect to the subject site. The Planning and Zoning Department staff will mount the photographs for presentations to the Planning and Development Board and City Commission. 36. The content of the permit plans are subject to compliance with all applicable city code of ordinances. It is the applicant's responsibility to show compliance. Additional comments may be generated following the review of permit plans. 37. If recommendations are approved by the City Commission, incorporate them into the working drawings required for permits for the project. a:quantums. wpd a:quantums.wpd MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 96 - 339 DATE: Tambri Heyden, Planning Director A ~ . L -y-J} 6- John A. Guidry, Utilities Directr:;? jJ// 7 J' October 22, 1996 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Quantum Park - Major Site Plan Modification Greenbelt and Sign Program changes We offer the following comments on this project: 1) Regarding the sign changes, please have the applicant submit an accurate survey with the proposed sign locations, so that we may determine if the signs will be within utilities easements, or otherwise impact our utilities. We have no objection to this project proceeding to its second review with the above information provided. Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella of this office. Attachment JAG/PVM bc: Peter Mazzella xc: Skip Milor File U:\WORDPERF\SEPOCT96\QPSIGNS.WPD RECREATION & PARK DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-479 rn UG ( I d ~ m 1111111' PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/ Environmentalist 't< ~ >> DATE: October 14, 1996 SUBJECT: Quantum Park (peripheral greenbelt and modified PCD sign program) 1 st Review- Major Site Plan Modification The applicant should indicate how all existing desirable vegetation including trees will be used in the buffer plantings. Recommendations: 1. The landscape materials should be placed entirely on properties owned by Quantum Park. 2.The appropriate agency (South Florida Water Management District, Lake Worth Water Management District, Florida Power and Light) should review the landscape buffer plans to make sure the vegetation meets the criteria of each agency, if the vegetation is planted within their easements. 3.The maintenance of the landscape buffers including irrigation should be the responsibility of the Quantum Park Association, rather than the individual lot owners. The project should continue in the normal review process. kjh PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #96-228 TO: Tambri J. Heyden, AICP, Planning & Zoning ~~or Carel Fisher, Deputy Public Works Director ~ THRU: FROM: Larry Quinn, Sanitation Superintendent SUBJ: Major Site Plan Modification - Quantum Park DATE: October 11, 1996 ill ~ U \Vi .14. The Public Works Department has no problems with the above site plan modification. arry Quinn Sanitation Superintendent LQ/cr m CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM rr~"<'J ~ ~ \ ~ TO: TAMBRI HEYDEN PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR DATE: 10 OCTOBER 96 I 'FILE: I ; l : PLANNI"MO , ~, ZONING PT. FROM: SUBJECT: QUANTUM P ARK(PERIPHERAL GREENBEL T MOD. & SIGN PROGRAM) SGT. MARLON HARRIS111:I1 REFERENCES: 0271 POLICE DEPARTMENy/r /' ENCLOSURES: I have reviewed the above plans and have no comments. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-523 TO: Carrie Parker, City Manager Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Dept. Chief Field Insp. Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer Sgt. Marlon Harris, Police Department AI Newbold, Building Division William Hukill, Director of Department of Development" ~ Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist tJl< ~, ":N'J Tambri J. Heyden, AICP, Planning & Zoning Director Wif October 8, 1996 FROM: DATE: RE: SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES 1 st Review - Major Site Plan Modification Project - Quantum Park (peripheral greenbelt and modified PCD sign program) Location - Northwest and southwest corners of the intersection of 1-95 and Gateway Boulevard Applicant - Roscoe Biby, Kimley Horn & Associates, Inc. (subject to change as application not yet received) File No. - MSPM 96-007 Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. New Site Plan approval for this project will be granted by the City Commission. To ensure that the project stays on line with the review time frame, I request that the plans and exhibits be reviewed and formal written comments transmitted to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department no later than 5:00 P.M. on October 16. 1996. (This application is being expedited as per City Manager.) Do not return plans and exhibits. Retain same for the review of the amended plans (second review). Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval: 1. Use the review standards specified in Part III, Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Section 8 of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments. 2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete based on the submittal requirements identified in Section 7 of the Site Plan Review Ordinance. However, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the reviewer through the Planning and Zoning Department. 3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the documents. 4. Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with other departmental improvements. 5. When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review specified. Page 2 of2 Carmax Quantum Park To: TRC Members Re: Planning & Zoning Memo 96-524 6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memo, within the time frame stated above, to the Planning and Zoning Director stating that the plans are approved and they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and recommend the project be forwarded through the approval process. All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department for distribution to the applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memo. Michael Haag will be the Planning and Zoning Department staff member coordinating the 1 st review of the project. The Planning and Zoning Department will send the applicant a cover letter which includes the comment(s) and directions to amend the plans to comply with the comments and the procedures for resubmission. When the Planning and Zoning Department receives the amended plans, they will distribute the plans with a cover memo to all TRC Members for review and approval. T JH:bme Attachment xc: (Memo Only) Jim Ness, Acting Fire Chief Charlie Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director Marshall Gage, Police Chief John Guidry, Utilities Director Central File A: 1 RCARMAX.wpd