The URL can be used to link to this page

REVIEW COMMENTS ........ MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES To determine a realistic traffic distribution pattern it is essential to undertake a careful review and evaluation of the surrounding developments within the zone of influence and to relate this data to HOME BASE TRIP PURPOSES: Work Trip = 30% Shopping Trip = 18% School Trip = 10% Social/Recreational Trip = Business Trip Other 21% = 12% 9% = Also, the characteristics of the highway links were reviewed to estimate the most logical route selection. Based on the previously indicated factors, a compilation of trip percentages was derived as displayed in the Trip Distribution Percentage -- Figure #2. TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT f J ------------------- ------------------- By utilizing the trip distribution percentages indicated in Figure #2, the development traffic on each affected highway link within the area of influence can be determined. The computations are depicted in the Development Daily Traffic -- Figure #3. So that the existing traffic conditions and the resulting impacts due to the development can be properly evaluated, it is necessary to determine the daily traffic levels on ALL HIGHWAY LINKS within the zone of influence. This data is depicted in the Existing + Development Daily Traffic -- Figure #4. Since a realistic build-out for the project is 3 years, it is important to evaluate the estimated background traffic, which are trips to be generated by other approved projects. Standard practice within Palm Beach County is to reflect the 50% estimated background traffic. This data is depicted in the Existing + Development + 50% Background Daily Traffic -- Figure #5. As a special requirement of the City of Boynton Beach, it was necessary to evaluate the traffic conditions, assuming full land use development. Thus, the Palm Beach County calculated full-build out daily traffic data & the development daily traffic for Citrus Glenn & Lawrence Groves are depicted in Figure #6. -4- / .; J MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCEUTAGES ============================= Figure i/2 A NORTH I 5% 2% Nelaleuca 1~~ 1" Lane /0 - 7% 2% 2% 107 Lantana 1% 2<:' 27, 10 n Road 50/ ..0 4% 2% 6% 5% ~5% Hypoluxo 2""' R07 18~ Road 15% /:- c... 8'%Y 35% 10% Jog Road 5% 202 20% Niner Road 15~; I SITE J.-.. 10% 45/; 15;~ 5% 2 30% 10% I~ 5% Old Boynton Beach Rd. 5% 5% ....... 57~ 20% 10/~ Bovnton Beach Road 10% 10% 1<7 5%Y I~ Lawrence 4% Road 5% 2 Ave. Military Trail Congress Avenue 1-95 -5- t~ MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES DEVELOPMENT DAILY TRAFFIC ------------------------- ------------------------- Figure #3 t NORTH 101 42 Melaleuca 21 21 Lane. 143 41 42 21 Lantana 21 41 42 Road 103 83 41 123 103 :.-103 HVDOluxo 41 164 370 Road 308 164' 720 205 Jog Road 411 411 Miner Road 309 I SITE 103 - 206 926 309 103 2 617 206 ~03 Old Boynton Beach Rd. 103 103 ....... 103 411 206 Bovnton ...... 205 206 206 Beach 20 103Y La\vrence 82 Road 103 2 Ave. Road Military Trail Congress Avenue 1-95 -6- .c ~ i a; 1 z ... .- "W ". III ~ S ... . I ;! "'" ~ I 3 III ,... . > . I IIIU l j:l'" "" +100 c u- 1 .... GO ... . ...... cn...2 caC") , ...... i ;ca ~c ~ IIIQ ..... ... pol ... . oDU j:l GO'" ... "'... rO'" ... CI . .. -" .. c:... Cl ... .. ... 0 i\ ...... "'rO .... .. II ...... ...... .. . .. II .. 1IIj:l lIIj:li-o ,... .., 0 ... GO 0 4 .,., ... '" I I .....C") 0"- GO "ltlt) NN , C")"lt ON \nit) COClO .. ' ~ ... ::3 i cON COO) "tj "ltcD li:i~ NN .illii: NN ....2 I I I , 0) CO ~~ ''It''lt , , Nit) ........ "'0) NN .,..... , i ~ , . It) C\l&N C\l&C") COCO ....,.. , 1 0)0) C")II) 0.... COeD , , ..,..('1) 0)'" 0)0 .11) .,...,.. , .. ('1)(11) .,..(11) C")(II) caCD I ._---------------~ MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES, PA. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSUL TANTS March 23, 1987 Alan Miller, Vice President Intracoastal Developers, Inc. 70 South Congress Avenue Suite 201 Delray Beach, Florida 33445 RE: Traffic Report For The Proposed Citrus Glenn Residential COffiQunity Located On The Eastside Of Lawrence Road & About 1.0 Miles South Of Hypoluxo Road In Palm Beach County MDDH Project #87-019 Dear Mr. Miller: I am pleased to submit subject project. The report findings and recommendations. the Traffic L~pact Analysis outlines the evaluation and Report for the sur:unarizes the I appreciated the service. Please advise required on this report. opportunity of providing this traffic engineering if further information and/or clarifications are Sincerely, ~~ /}/ />>.~. Danlel N. Murray, P.E. L MERRITT ISLAND OFFICE, 100 PMNELL STREET · MERRITT ISLAND. FLORIDA 3295] · (]OS) 459.2905 CORPORATE HDQTRS.: 7301-A. W. PALMETTO PARK ROAD. SUITE 302-A. BOCA RATON, FLORIDA U433. (305) 391-MDDM L- MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES PLANNING DATA ------------- ------------- The Traffic Engineering Impact Analysis was based on the site plan prepared by MSM Architects & Planners. Specifically, the site plan reflects a proposed residential community of patio homes & duplex units. The following data describes the site data of the development: .".."...".........."."""". ....".."..".. ......"."""..""....... .... "."..""".""......"."..""""".."""...."" .......""""""""""""...."""" Site acreage.................................53 acres patio homes / zero lot.......................132 dwelling units duplex units.................................118 dwelling units Recreational Racquet Club Facility...........2 tennis courts 1 swimming pool Access a. Residential collector street thru the property b. Direct access onto Lawrence Road c. Direct access onto Miner Road ..."""""""""" ...." ..."""""""""""" ....."..""""....""""" ........... ....." ...".. ..........."" ...".." ........."".. ...."".. ............ Other pertinent data that was researched and evaluated includes the inventory of the highway links adjacent to the site & within the zone of influence. Likewise, the traffic activity at the adjacent intersections within the 1.5 mile zone of influence was recorded during the peak periods. Trip Generation and Distribution -------------------------------- -------------------------------- In determining the trip generation development, it was necessary to use Institute of Transportations Engineers Edition Publication. Based on this data computations were made: rate for the subject the recently published Trip Generation--Third sources the subsequent ::::::::: ::::::: ::: ::: ::::::::: :::::::::::::::::: :::::: :::::::::: TYPE OF FACILITY UNIT SIZE TRIP RATE DAILY TRIPS duplex patio homes 118 d.u. 132 d.u. 7 trips/d.u. 10 trips/d.u. 826 trips/day 1,320 trips/day .. ....."" ....."""""".."........ ............ .... ... ............... ..""".."" ....."" ...".. ......... ...... .... ......... ... ............ TRIP DEDUCTIONS racquet club 2 courts 44.3 trips/court 89 trips/day ......................................................... ........ ............................................................ ..... RESULTING EXTERNAL TRIPS = 826 + 1,320 - 89 = 2,057 trips/day .... ..... .......... ............ .......... ......... ............... .......... .................................................. ..... -3- MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES TRAFFIC I~WACT ANALYSIS REPORT ON THE CITRUS GLENN RESIDENTIAL cor~ruNITY LOCATED ON THE EASTSIDE OF LA\vRENCE ROAD ABOUT 1.0 MILES SOUTH OF HYPOLUXO ROAD IN P AU1 BEACH COUNTY MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES Prepared By: Cj ... ./ .A / /7.1 v<J c::...-r /V'_ /""r7 3~0? Daniel N. Murray, P.E. Date .1--- MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES TABLE OF CONTENT ---------------- ---------------- Page Introduction..................................................1 Site Location Map -- Figure #1................................2 Planning Data................................................. 3 Trip Generation and Distribution..............................3 Traffic Assignment............................................4 Trip Distribution Percentages -- Figure #2....................5 Development Daily Traffic -- Figure #3........................6 Existing + Development Daily Traffic -- Figure #4.............7 Existing + Development + 50% Background Daily Traffic -- Figure #5.....................8 Full Land Use Build-Out Daily Traffic -- Figure #6............9 Development Access AN Peak Hour Traffic Figure #7. . . . . . . . .11 Development Access PH Peak Hour Traffic Figure #7A....... .12 AH Peak Hour Traffic Figure #8. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 PM Peak Hour Traffic Figure #9. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 Highway Capacity Analysis....................................15 Highway Link Capacities -- Figure #10........................16 Existing Highway Geometrics & 5 Year Highway Improvements Figure # 11. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17 Traffic Performance Standards Category Eva1uations...........18 Traffic Performance Link Categories -- Figure #12............19 Comparison Of Existing Zone To Proposed Project..............20 Fair Share Traffic Impact Fees...............................20 Required Highway Improvements................................21 Appendix "A" -- Highway Capacity Analysis MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES INTRODUCTION ------------ ------------ A 53 acre parcel of property located on the eastside of Lawrence Road & approximately 1.0 miles south of Hypoluxo Road is being proposed as a PATIO-HOME & DUPLEX UNIT residential community. The development site plan has been identified as "CITRUS GLENN". The project has two accesses, which consist of one onto Lawrence Road about 900 feet south of t1iner Road intersection and the other driveway intersects Miner Road about 1500 feet east of Lawrence Road. For additional background information and details, reference should be made to the Site Location Hap -- Figure #1. To ensure that the traffic flow and safety issues are properly addressed, the City of Boynton Beach requires that a current traffic impact analysis & report be undertaken to address the traffic generated by the proposed development and its effect on the adjacent highway links & intersections. As a result Murray _ Dudeck & Associates, Traffic Engineering Consultants have been retained by the developer to investigate and determine the traffic impacts created by the proposed Citrus Glenn residential community. In conducting the traffic study, it was necessary to evaluate the existing highway network and their associated traffic volumes. Then the development traffic had to be determined and assigned to the surrounding highways. Consideration of adjacent trip attractions and trip productions was important in examining the development trip patterns. Traffic data from Palm Beach County and the Florida Department of Transportation was utilized. Also, the map & graph data published by the Area Planning Board was used. Furthermore, an inventory of the adjacent highway network was undertaken. Likewise, detailed 24-hour machine counts & peak hour intersection turning movement counts were taken in conformance with City data collection requirements. -1- i c Ii ~ .. I z .. ~ .......: i ~ I I "'" N .. I II: .. ! I ~ .. .. ~ . ~ I riJ 1 i 1II 1&1 t- - tn ~ H H H ::0:: ~ g ::c: ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ z< o u H ~- ta -u z~ ~g ~ g ~ t.!) g 0 'J ::r: ~ u g ;J . ~ ~ ~ z. 0 -< E-t H ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ - --------~-------_._._-----_."-_.- + l.J ~ 'M .. "'.... .. .,., .. ...... i 5 i 1Il II .. c I ... "''" e; I .. 01-0 ... Z .. ... 0 -< .. ... .,., .... .. c: oD '" ...... III +u ... "'.... "'.. I ... (30.... '" ..."" ....... + .100 .. '0 Dole .... OIl'" z'" ~ ~I "'... '" ,. ""'... .... ... 0 0 ~... ... .. ,..'1"- "'... .. .. It Dol,..'l ....... ....>J, >... .. .. .. '" ! lIIe III'" I&l CD QC IA I I +c ........ . ..00 UP CII)..... N ....'" .0 ca~ "" .... rc ...Illl '" .... "'u .. ... GO ... .... I (/)I0Il i ca'" '" ...... ...u ,..., ...< ~ ...~ ..0 .... ... l"l l"l ...... ,..., 0- '" '" ,... N ...... I CD , CW)::;- CII)'" N:;:( cD'" ......... ,... (30 cD CD~ ''It..... N~ N::; (");::; 0'" Lt')~ CO:::: >- &>to ~ ..:I ~~ o .... .., IX) N ...... i ~ ..... ..0 4 N .... <'\ ...... .,..., N~ NO> cD~ ... ...... N ..... (7) :2 N 1'1 N ~ ... ...... ,..., .., GO ... <0 .... ...... ..... "'0- <'\..0 0'" .0<1' ...... u ... "" >D i " "" " ~ .... III .c llII Z .... ... ... .... ~ a; .... ~ 11( III Ol .. :;J ... ... t-o .. .. .. III j:l ~ ... i ~ ... u ... ... I:> 01 + I 0 A Ol Q .. .. ..:I :;J . u ... 0 0.... . ~ ~\ ..... '0 u.... I ... III WI .... .. .. ell :;J u... ~ ,.. IQ c: 001\ ..~ A 00- ... ..... .. or< ... :..... .. ....... :;J 11111 ..:I .., "" ..:I A I ,.. :j i 0'" I:> o lID 011"1' ,..., Ill.... 0 4 11"1 0 III 0 11"1 GO .... .,., , 0) , "... 0,," 0,... 0"" ....-- '" iaa ;>0 ... c .... ::::i !i? ,...., Olll- 0"" 0...... 0- ,..., M 00- 0"" 0-- 0- .,., ,...., 0::1'> 01"'\ ::; -' ,...., 00 oe- 0'" 00-- .... N N 000 0,," 0<'> N-' <"l i ~ ,.. 0"" 0"" o pol GO.... '" ,.... 04 00- 0... 11"1.... ..... ,.... 010 0"" 0.... '" .., ,.... 0'" OM 0.... GO '" ,..., OM 01"'\ 0'" 00.... '? ,.. 00 0'" 0'" 1I"Ir< r< ..., ,.. OlD Ot'l 0"" .. ..... I MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES To compute the average peak hour turning counts development access and the adjacent intersection, necessary to utilize the peak hour rates indicated in Trip Generation Publication. The results are depicted as at the it was the ITE follows: ...................... ............................... ....................................... .... ............................................... "'............ .................................................... AM Peak Hour Calculations patio homes 132 Trip Rate Hourly Traffic --------- -------------- In Out 0.09 11 vph 0,50 59 vph 0.21 28 vph 0.55 73 vph -- --- 39 vph 132 vph Facility Unit duplex 118 : :::::: :::::::::: :::::::: :::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: PM Peak Hour Calculations patio homes 132 Trip Rate Hourly Traffic --------- -------------- In Out 0.50 59 vph 0.24 28 vph 0.63 83 vph 0.37 49 vph --- --- 142 vph 77 vph Facility Unit duplex 118 .............................. ............................... ............................. .......... ....... .................................................................................. ............... ........ The peak hour traffic at the project access is shO\vn in AH &. PM Development Access Peak Hour Traffic Figure #7 & #7A. Likewise, the existing and the development peak hour turning counts at the adjacent intersections are indicated in the AM Peak Hour Traffic -- Figure #8 & PM Peak Hour Traffic -- Figure #9. -10- ^ ._----~._. -+-..-------.----....----.-------.-- MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES DEVELOPMENT ACCESS AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ======================================= Figure #7 NORTH HVDo1uxo Rd. A I 14 (15) ~ (54) Y -4. ..(67) Lawrence Groves .. -( 46 (19) (55)(12) 6 8 Y -4. ~26 (3) .. 20 (16) (55) 6 ~20 Y -4. .. 60 ~ 17 (16) ~8 ~ ~ 8 .... 26 26 Miner Rd. CITRUS GLENN LEGEND ****** 17 Citrus Glenn AM Peak Hour Turning Traffic (16) Lawrence Groves Am Peak Hour Turning Traffic -11- MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES DEVELOPMENT ACCESS PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ======================================= 50 (58) ~(31) " "" ~ ( 38) A -( 27 (71) (31) (7) 22 28 " ~ ~15 (13) A 12 (58) (31) 22 ~ 12 " ~ ~35 ~ -- 64 (58) Figure #7A Hvpoluxo Rd. Lawrence Groves ~28 ~ "f 28..... 15 15 CITRUS GLENN -12- NORTH A I Hiner Rd. LEGEND ****** 64 Citrus Glenn AM Peak Hour Turning Traffic (58) Lawrence Groves Am Peak Hour Turning Traffic 4l ~ z c: GO .... c .. , a: . 0 .. z i '" I . ... s ~~~ 1M . ... .... :c 0 << '" ~ (. '-SE i u ~ ... c ~ ~ . ..... 11'\ ~ ~ .... ,... ~ is---''' ~ ..., ?c ~ .. .- . ~ ! u s. .. u ... .... .... ~ I f .... ... .. .... .... N C') c:: L-~ .. 1 ~ a 'I"' ::I -. I 0 lC o 'U ji~ +-~~ r< .. 1 CI ... . .... ..... ~ f- .-"'-' Sla ~ + ... r< "'" .. E.~~ ~ $1 ~r ~I 00 ::I 00 " 0 " .... lC -. eJ .... .. ~~-. .. III ~ III .... II .... r:! l ..... r:! -. -. ",~-. -....... GO 8' l"lll'\ ,... GO ..0 0- ... ""',... "'" ..... ... ! !! ... i ~ -.~..... il'; .-;~ .... .:f..... ~~ ,....'t c..---... ~I~I ,.... ~;;'$ ".,.,~ = ~ .., ..... ..... ,. - ~ o 71 ~ ~c.l.;.~. .:f,w.t ~~ j. ~ li'~ RtfI'l1r;; - - i ....,J 001;[.. ~ -; I' Elr-.-...I I', . "~"'~I '.,...... T'.W[: mUl~1n~. I '!'l~' ..t' f. ~ ",. "~" , .t[- ~ ~ -~ II.I-"~ -..... - 11 ~, U;-','j "....' .", 'f W\. i I ~ :~-;~~ ~~~ ~~~~~." ~~ _ ~ .~. ~ 7l 'r--- ~~' ~~::i 1 " :. - ~~:'-l~" ~1H .1- ~ -=.- .,.., ('\.~ /. I uti" r:fJ~1P.(~t ~' "rrJ.~' I:J;, ~t~~~~~ '; ~ ~ ~~~. I J~' ,-,-:1: ~Il' ~ ~,,~ ~ *1~'" ,.: j. (j--~r ~ I) ~ Il').'~, \~ !&!:~- :- ~"~ I' ~ i ~ ~F !!l-4:.~, ,llll I l-I '-r __ ~ ~_ ' -r~f,j -"7'': . ,... (":f I ~ r~~~,4~.. q.!J~:~~~~ '~~~I'~'.r' '~.~ ~!t-j?) 4~~" ~iiJ: .. ;;. -.~ -:.'" ~~~.., 1:~i1'r;I)~~':;:~~" -., . ", ~~~ ~\1~\ r '.;:.\; C . 4 -, f-. ::t. -:---- .'OJ:II\ I ~ I i .~ . .~w _ .1~' ':;' . '. -=-=- . -- ,,'" ~. "",~...."t ~m ~ -., ~~ ~ ~'~~Ill; ~,~ I s ijJ~~:" :~~ ..ft-i ; ~ .:;; ~ .tt1~I~ · ~;: .L:.~' l ~~-- ;.;~.i.": I~, ~.~, I~~ r- - ". ....~:" [~;t . - ~ i1U. Ie ,~I!' - I' ~~'" I ..:jJ,rl~IF"~L~"":r .", ~:I HIJi'T ...,~ gt MI .~.; - 1'1;;.". I J: I~J.r...J..,'~ .-w.r;r- ~ - -~- . 7- ,,~." .!! ~'~ . - ..' ". .... r I ~.tlN- c.!!r!,~III1' ...,.., . .L 'F - ~ g It . .~~ r"- '~.111I....,.. ;o!~R;'1 ;z:: .?t".~::.=J ~ I · ~ ll-~'j:~ i!~i:i!~~ ,:. (tjl:!~!r!~~" .~. ~ T' ~.~ ~.! ~ -,-. rr jJ..\ ~w~ ~ . r ~ ~ it -- · : ~ g <5 ~ ~ ~ . t' :-" . J il ~ i · :. ';; f-; I "~ ftf ~: - =: ~ ~:~ -. ,~ """.1 I I .... -. -. ~;:l"'" " -_!~' II.(,~'U ')al'- . ...., - , --. ~ ~. !i ~ ::l r::- ,~~~l ~l'-: ~.. I I 0 i ~~~ t +-. : ~.....: R' ~:,~~~'~J'll l' ,., .., I 1../ '.'t." !~ ~'t~' , ,I -1 S 3f~ !~ ~~ ~ .t.~ i ~S-+ ~ ~Sl ,.... Q'l,....~ co ""'_~ ""!!i1 >D " .. ......~'-' ..... -. -. .to. -. "'" ! ~" ~ 2 .... ~::: ~1""'!I""'r +-~a ..; . 1. .-~~ E.~~ 4) ..... ~;--. ~I ~i ( "..... ""'"' ""'" ,.... o-.~~lR ..... 11'\ ..... ~s_ , ,.. ,.. ~ c"I cJ S ~ ... ~1!t~~1 ~~~ ...., '6 tP--'" eel' ... \ " .. " ~, . ,,11 \ la \ iC .. \ ~ . \ .c .. ,..'" ..... :!.", S ~ S ~...',.. S\ l.a ' ..-~~ . ':.\ .. \,. r: ~i l ~~ ~:$\ ~ ~--" l ~ ~\ ,.... ,..."'" ,..... on ~-. ~ l ..., ~ I "* ~ I ~ ,..'" 4' i i 't1 ~~ (flr' _i! ,,) . \., ..-:~% ~ \~\~r I ....,i -:t<'<0 ~-. e ~ c . .-,.~ . ~ ~ ~ ... .('"ol '" ~... ~~,.. ~i?l ,-~\ -t of \to ...-: ': C \ ~ [.J ~ ~Jtr;,(P I 'i ~ 1'1\\ \'H ,..~ ~~"" C"l .... c"I"'" "" f7' \ -- \ ~ e" f. a ~ ~ 0 f. ~ &. ~ t. ~ \., ....... ..... ..... a:.e ...':, """ ~ ~&. ~ 'i~ ~ -at. ,~ ... III ... ~ ~ ,... ~ ~ -' - !: ..,'.IC:~ "iI' I \..P I" ~". . 'I.' \=,~,' \~im~' . lti\~U::~~;l \ 1..... ..'ll! \1 ,.. 'h...l .....f., ':'I> ".. .' . ....,....u;,~= ,- "h !l'~\-." · T '. .- :: I"'" ;.' _ .' - ,,->'\ \1'1' ' ~~.--...'.. _.~, .' . I'<l'II' ..",-""- l;;I~ .~. · , . , ~ ~ ~!Jilll ~ _' "':;.:~ 11 \ P. ,~~. ;; }~.;:.,;, ~ ~ ~ ,~\ ~ ~~>' \ \ .1'&, -;. ~tiiJ"- .~ . i-l.!i~ ;; ~ ~ ~~" ,~ . 1\ I.' e--- -]'.~' .' '" \ ~ .... ..:::. 1\\\,,1 1 \ \ \ I >-, .,~ . 7 · ., i ~._"",,' \IT,4-:' < ~ tlv ~~ ;f!A"u -. ~ f;"~~~~ .;.O'a"l.t;.'r~~ ~~):)~ -~'<1 i:f) t,:. ,...' ~I". - . .~-::-~...., ::J ..->ir: ~. ,\' ;<<>1' .. , .,., i' .~ · . '_ ~ .t:~J.O I I\JJ I I ' \ ~ J ' .,. - ""'"'~ . ' ,'~ ~~ . t' w' ,,' '" ' ",'. ' ,..lL -;:Fi 1. . Jo, ~ :r.:. __ L. ~' "... \. \~~. cj , ~ "'\" L " " ' ' '" ." ., . \' Ir " . iO . " ~ -i , '::', "'" ~ . L ~.,- .._\~:I.i.':'" ',II4:':YY' ~- ~ ~ ~ ,,'" 'I' ~ .. ~. ,'''C> r .WI" \"",jf\L::<r. j;l.'. H ; "" \\;i;I.F ~, , ~ l' .' \, ijfl\\l: ,-, r ilL .\ Ill: ."''''' ""';~':: \', ~ ~~)~ ..0:- ~_. L". '-, ~~ ~.: ,~!'!'AA:p" ,. ~ ;:a h.. ~_ " \ ~~ 1.~11.\\~a.", , ' I ' ,,'r~,'~';'j ,I' . ~..' \(' ~~ r. 1\ '''1; ~' _' ':1. I I \i~ ~ ~ ~ ~!.l ':;,~,~ ~ ,_.0 %: ~ 9:!. :::~~ ,~~~~~:~ ';' ~ ~! \~ ~ ,,- \~~,~~~r,Yi]i\I:i . " \1.. . .-~s \lV-~"~' \i \~~\\ .';;:iCl'-=" ~.....-' .. ~ ",,"'" .'"..--.-------- MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES HIGHWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS ------------------------- ------------------------- To determine the level of service of the adjacent highway links, which the subject project will impact, it is essential to examine the highway carrying capacity. Reasonable and acceptable traffic movement can be achieved if the roadway sections are operating at or above level of service "D". Based on Palm Beach County criteria, for a 2-lane undivided highway a total of 11,500 vehicles per day results in "D" service, for a 4-lane divided highway the figure is 27,600 vehicles per day, for a 6-lane divided highway the figure is 41,400 vehicles per day. Furthermore, to achieve the optimum expected traffic flow it requires that all links operate at level of service "c" or better, which is 10,000 vehicles per day for a 2-lane undivided highway, 24,000 vehicles per day for a 4-lane divided roadway, 36,000 vehicles per day for a 6-lane divided roadway. A careful examination of the daily traffic figures shown in Figure #4 was made so that the highway link capacities could be determined. Under the existing traffic levels & current highway geometrics a number of links are below acceptable level of service, as depicted in the Highway Link Capacities -- Figure #10. However, by incorporating the roadway improvements, as indicated in the PAUl BEACH COUNTY 5 YEAR HORK PROGRAH & shown in Figure #11, sufficient capacity will exist. Details of the link capacity analysis are depicted in Figure #10. Lastly, the highway link capacity with the 5-Year Work Program Highway Geometrics and with full build-out on the land use would result in most links being excessively over-capacity. Most links 1vould be at Level of Service "E" as indicated in Figure #10. To determine the peak hour impacts, it is necessary to evaluate the traffic movements at the critical adjacent intersections within the 1.5 mile zone of influence. The specific intersections and corresponding traffic movements are shown in Figure #8 & #9. By utilizing the Transportation Research Circular #212, the Critical Movement Analysis" methodology, a determination of the actual level of services can be made. The analysis as shown in Appendix "A" clearly substantiates that these intersections will operate at an acceptable level of service when the development traffic & Lawrence Groves traffic impact is generated, assuming the 5-year Work Program Improvements are implemented. -15- MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES HIGHWAY LINK CAPACITIES ----------------------- ----------------------- Figure #10 t NORTH E E C (B) (B) "c" <B>"\, <B> II' [E] [E] [D], Mela1euca Lane E c-f E (A), B (C) <A> "c" "B" <C> [E] [E] [E], [C], Lantana Road C~ D~ E (A) A ~C "c" (A) -- <A> "A" "c" [E] <A> [E] [E] [E] E Road E B ~"~,, \-(~) (B) ~~~~ C <B> [E] [C] "c" <C> Jog Road [E] Miner Rd [E] [C] A SITE B "A" "B" ~ [E] [E] C ......-: "c" Old Boynton Beach Rd. E 22 Ave. Bo nton Beach Road E C B E Lawrence (B) "c" "B" "'" (A) Road <B> [E] [E] <A> [D] [C] Military Congress Trail Avenue C "c" E 1-95 LEGEND ****** E L.S. Under Existing Geometrics & 1986 Daily Traffic "A" L.S. Under Existing Geometrics & 1986 + Development Daily Traffic (A) L.S. Under 5-Year Work Program Geometrics & 1986 Daily Traffic <A> L.S. Under 5-Year Work Program Geometrics & 1986 + Development Daily Traffic [E] L.S. Under 5-Year Work Program Geometrics & Fuild Build-Out Of The Palm Beach County Land Use Plan -16- MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES EXISTING HIGJruAY GEOMETRICS & 5 YEAR HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- Melaleuca 2L A NORTH Figure fill 2L(4L) 6L / 2L SL Lane 4L 2L(4L) 4L 2L(4L) 2L(4L) 2L(4L) Lantana 2L 4L 4L 4L 4L Road 2L 4L 2L 4L 4L Road 2L 4L 2L 4L ~1iner Road SITE 4L 2L 2L 2L 22 Ave. 2L(4L) 2L(4L) Jog Road 2L(4L) Old Boynton Beach Rd. 2L Bo nton Beach 4L 4L Road 4L Lawrence Road 2L(4L) Nilitary Trail Congress Avenue 1-95 LEGEND ****** 2L Existing Highway Laneage (4L) Proposed Highway Laneage -17- L MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES TRAFFIC PERFORNANCE STANDARDS CATEGORY EVALUATIONS -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Since the City of Boynton Beach requires the traffic impact analysis to be in conformance with the Palm Beach County criteria, it is necessary to conduct a TRAFFIC PERFOill1ANCE ANALYSIS. As mandated by Palm Beach County, all highway links within the influence area of traffic impact have to be analysed to determine if there are critical traffic capacity constraints. Specifically, when the existing daily traffic is over level of service "D" on any link and the developnent significantly impacts the traffic level, then the project is a Category "A". Likewise, when the link total daily traffic exceeds level of service "D" and the development significantly impacts the traffic level, then the project is a Category "B". Thus a detailed analysis of the daily traffic on the affected links within the traffic zone of influence was undertaken. The results are depicted in the Traffic Performance Standard Evaluation -- Figure ~12. Based on this evaluation the following comments are offered: #1 In analyzing the daily traffic under the criteria in Category "A" on all affected links, the results indicated that the project is not flagged as a Category "A" project. Therefore, this project DOES NOT have to committ to off site roadway improvements, before even being considered a viable project submission. #2 In reviewing the daily traffic under the criteria in Category "B" on all affected links, the results indicated that the project is not flagged as a Category "B" project. Therefore, the need to consider density reductions is not necessary. #3 An examination of the daily traffic in conjunction with the Category "c" requirenents, substantiates that the proposed development at full capacity is a Category "c" Project. The PHASIKG requirement is such that no phase impacts a thoroughfare greater than 2,000 trips/day on a 2-lane undivided highway and 4,800 trips/day on a 4-1ane divided highway. Obviously, this project does not generate that intensity of traffic, thus phasing is not required. -18- MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE LINK CATEGORIES =================================== Figure #12 A NORTH I NSE NSE Melaleuca NSE NSE Lane ME NSE NSE NSE Lantana NSE NSE NSE Road NSE ME ME NSE HVDOluxo NSE NSE HE Road ME S1 ME Jog Road NSE SE Miner Road T SITE ..- ME SI ME NSE 2 SE Old Boynton Beach Rd. NSE NSE NSE SE NSE Bovnton Beach NSE X-r.; HE NSE Road I NSE ~2"Tence Road 2 Ave. Hili tary Trail Congress Avenue 1-95 LEGEND ***':<** NSE No Significant Effect ME Minor Effect SE Significant Effect S1 Significant Impact -19- ~ MURRAY-DUDECK. ASSOCIATES COMPARISION OF EXISTING ZONE TO PROPOSED PROJECT ================================================ The project site is currently within the unincorporated area of Palm Beach County. Based on the Land Use Plan in the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan this property has a land use category of t1EDIU!I HEDIill1 HIGH RESIDENTIAL, which has a standard density of 8 dwelling units/acre. The proposed development is 4.72 dwelling units/acre, 'vhich is approximately a 40% reduction in the density. An analysis of the traffic depicted in Fi3ure #4 and the capacity findings shown in Figure no, verifies that the increased traffic will not change the level of services. However, such an increase will reduce the quality of traffic flow and cause some minor increases in the delay, which can be assumed to result in some increased adverse conditions under the existin3 zoning. Thus, the proposed development is a positive improvement from the standpoint of reducing the allmvable traffic impacts under current zoning. FAIR SHARE TRAFFIC DWACT FEES ------------------------------ ------------------------------ Based on the Palm Beach County Ordinance #85-10, developers are required to pay a fair share fee for impacts created by their development traffic. This ordinance has established fee rates for various type of land development activity. The following calculations depict the land development categories, the dollar rate, and the total fee assessment: ....... ..... .......... ................. ............... ............. ........ ........ ....................... ....... ... ................... ............. ... ....... Duplex Units Units Fee Rate/Unit Cost ------------- 132 d.u. $804/d.u. ~106,128 118 d.u. $562/d.u. $66,316 ------- ------- $172,41+4 Type of Land Development Patio-Homes .. ......... ............... ... ............ ......... ..... .................... ....... ........ ............ ....... ........... .............. ........... ....... -20- L MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES REQUIRED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS ============================= To determine if any highway improvements are necessary to maintain a reasonable level of traffic flow and safety, detailed link capacity analysis and critical lane intersectional analysis were undertaken. Also, it is important to take into consideration the S-Year Work Program in Palm Beach County, since major capacity improvements will be occurring within the zone of influence of the proposed project. Recognizing all these issues, ' the following improvements are recommended: A. INTERNAL COLLECTOR ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS a. At first cross-access from Lawrence Road 1. 100 foot left turn storage lanes for eastbound & westbound directions on the Collector Road b. At second cross-access from Lawrence Road by the recreational facilities 1. 100 foot right turn lane for westbound direction on the Collector Road 2. 100 foot left turn lane for eastbound & westbound on the Collector Road B. DIRECT ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS @ the main development access onto Lawrence Road 1. southbound left turn lane 2. northbound right turn lane 3. westbound right turn lane 4. westbound left turn lane C. DIRECT ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS @ the main development access onto Miner Road 1. westbound left turn lane 2. eastbound right turn lane 3. northbound right turn lane 4. northbound left turn lane C. INDIRECT ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS 1. construct southbound left turn lane on Lawrence Road @ Miner Road 2. construct westbound right turn lane on Miner Road @ Lawrence Road intersection 3. re-construct drainage structure @ canal just north of Miner Road to accomodate three travel lanes -21- MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES D. REQUIRED SIGNING & PAVEMENT MARKINGS 1. shall conform with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). 2. all intersections should have stop signs & stopbars E. COMPLIANCE TO SIGHT TRIANGLE CRITERIA With the aforementioned transportation improvements, the. traveling public will not be adversely affected by the traffic generated by the subject development. Furthermore, the traffic impact fee of $172,444 should be applied toward any INDIRECT ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS, because they are mitigating transportation problems which will substantially benefit non-development traffic. -22- MURRAY -DUDECK. ASSOCIATES APPENDIX "A" ==-====-===== HIGHWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS ========================= Level of Service AM PM I) Military Trail & Hypoluxo Road a. Existing Peak Hour Traffic E E b. Existing + Development Peak Hour Traffic C B c. Existing + Citrus Glenn + Lawrence Grove Peak Hour Traffic C C II) Congress Avenue & Hypoluxo Road a. Existing Peak Hour Traffic B D b. Existin8 + Development Peak Hour Traffic B D c. Existing + Citrus Glenn + Lawrence Grove Peak Hour Traffic C D III) Lawrence Road & Old Boynton Beach Road a. Existing Peak Hour Traffic B A b. Existing + Development Peak Hour Traffic B A c. Existing + Citrus Glenn + Lawrence Grove Peak Hour Traffic C A IV) Lawrence Road & Hypoluxo Road a. Existing Peak Hour Traffic A A b. Existing + Development Peak Hour Traffic B A c. Existing + Citrus Glenn + Lawrence Grove Peak Hour Traffic B B V) Lawrence Road & 22ND Avenue a. Existing Peak Hour Traffic A A b. Existing + Development Peak Hour Traffic A A c. Existing + Citrus Glenn + Lawrence Grove Peak Hour Traffic A A r MURRAY-DUDECK Ir ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS MILITARY TRAIL & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST. AM PIIT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/9/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE E SATURATION 104 CRITICAL H/S VOL 882 CRITICAL E/W VOL 826 CRITICAL SUM 1708 ************************************* LANE 1 2 3 4 5 6 NORTHBOUND MOV WIDTH RT. 12.0 L.. 12.0 LANE GEOMETRY SOUI'HBOUND EASTBOUND MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH RT. 12.0 1.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 L.. 12.0 WESTBOUND MOV WIDTH RT. 12.0 L.. 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEIT 27 220 16 104 THRU 219 430 528 198 RIGHT 286 18 52 54 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .85 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .85 EASTBOUND 2 0 .85 WESTBOUND 2 0 .85 PHASING N/S E/W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTH G/C - NB & SB THRU G/C - EB & WE THRU :4. :4. l. : 80 SECONDS : .34 : .3 BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) o - 99 (IPEDS/HR) CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 605 537 695 301 LEFT 34 277 20 131 LEIT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 27 220 16 104 CAPACITY 152 95 288 0 NEED PHASE? N/A N/A N/A H/A - MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS MILITARY TRAIL & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST. PM PHT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/9/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE E SATURATION 103 CRITICAL H/S VOL 976 CRITICAL E/W VOL 719 CRITICAL SUM 1695 ************************************* LANE NORTIlBOUND MOV WIDTIl RT. 12.0 L.. 12.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 NORTHBOUND LEFT TIlRU RIGHT 73 483 155 TRUCKS (%) 2 2 2 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PHASING N/S E/W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTH G/C - NB & SB THRU G/C - EB & WE THRU LANE GEOMETRY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MOV WIDllI MOV WIDTH WESTBOUND MOV WIDTH RT. 12.0 L.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 L.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 L.. 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 168 262 33 LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) o o o o 35 262 33 177 392 171 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .85 .85 .85 .85 :4. :4. 1. : 80 SECONDS : .34 : .3 BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITIl OVERLAP) o - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTIlBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND TIfRU -RIGHT 765 353 353 675 LEFT 91 211 44 223 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPlrr VOLUME 73 168 35 177 CAPACITY 305 0 0 245 HEED PHASE? N/A H/A N/A H/A , <~~ ~:il~';:~.' J- MURRAY -DUDECK Ir ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS MILITARY TRAIL & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST .+DEV. AM PlIT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/9/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE C SATURATION 67 CRITICAL N/S VOL 606 CRITICAL E/W VOL 498 CRITICAL SUM 1104 ************************************* .' LANE GE(}ffi'fRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MaV WIDTIi MOV WIDTII MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 2 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 3 L.. 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 4 5 6 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTh"BOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFI' 27 222 16 104 THRU 219 430 529 201 RIGHT 317 20 58 68 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .85 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .85 EASTBOUND 2 0 .85 WESTBOUND 2 0 .85 PHASING N/S EN PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTH G/C - NB & SB THRU G/C - EB & WE THRU :4. :4. 1. 80 SECONDS : .34 : .3 BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) o - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGlIT 327 282 367 167 LEFT 34 279 20 131 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 27 222 16 104 CAPACITY ISO 64 271 0 NEED PHASE? N/A N/A N/A N/A MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES p. CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS MILITARY TRAIL & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST .+DEV. PM PIIT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/9/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE B SATURATION 63 CRITICAL HIS VOL 630 CRITICAL E/W VOL 411 CRITICAL SUM 1041 ************************************* LANE 1 2 3 4 5 6 NORTIlBOUND MOV WIDTIl RT. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 NORTHBOUND LEFT THRU RIGHT 73 483 172 TRUCKS (%) 2 2 2 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PHASING N/s E/W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTH GIC - NB & SB THRU GIC - EB & WE THRU LANE GEOMETRY SOlITHBOUND EASTBOUND MOV WIDTIl MOV WIDTH WESTBOUND MOV WIDTIl RT. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 177 262 37 35 265 37 177 392 195 LOCAL BUSES (I/HR) o o o o PEAK HOUR FACTOR .85 .85 .85 .85 :4. :4. 1. 80 SECONDS : .34 : .3 BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITII OVERLAP) BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) o - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOlITHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 407 187 188 363 ~~~~ .~ LEFT 91 223 44 223 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTIlBOUND SOlITHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 73 177 35 177 CAPACITY 301 0 0 238 NEED PHASE? N/A N/A N/A N/A 1-..--- MURRAY -DUDECK. ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS MILITARY TRAIL & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST .+CITRUS+LAWRENCE AM PlIT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/9/87 .......*********.************..*** LEVEL OF SERVICE C SATURATION 67 CRITICAL N/S VOL 609 CRITICAL E/W VOL 499 CRITICAL SUM 1108 ************************************* ,. LANE GECJ1ETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND ~STBOUND LANE HaV WIDTH MOV WIDlH HaV WIDTH HOV WIDTH 1 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 2 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 3 L. . 12.0 L.. 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 4 5 6 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTIiBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 27 224 16 104 THRU 219 430 530 203 RIGHT 317 20 58 75 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACI'OR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .85 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .85 EASTBOUND 2 0 .85 WESTBOUND 2 0 .85 PHASING N/S E/W PEDESTRIAN ACI'IVITY CYCLE LENGTH G/C - NB & SB THRU G/C - EB & WB THRU :4. :4. 1. : 80 SECONDS : .34 : .3 BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) BOTH TURNS PROTECI'ED (WITH OVERLAP) o - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 327 282 368 172 LEFT 34 282 20 131 LEn' TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 27 224 16 104 CAPACITY 150 64 262 0 NEED PHASE? N/A N/A N/A N/A .' MURRAY -DUDECK. ASSOCIATES " CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS MlLITARY TRAIL & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST .+CITRUS+UWRENCE PM PIIT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/9/87 ...........*.........*..**........ LEVEL OF SERVICE B SATURATION 64 CRITICAL H/S VOL 640 CRITICAL E/W VOL 413 CRITICAL sm! 1053 *....*******.************************ LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WID1H MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 2 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 3 L.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 4 5 6 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFI' 73 185 35 177 THRU 483 262 268 393 RIGHT 172 37 37 199 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NOR1HBOUND 2 0 .85 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .85 EASTBOUND 2 0 .85 WESTBOUND 2 0 .85 PHASING N/S E/W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENG1H G/C - NB & SB THRU G/C - EB & WE THRU :4. :4. l. : 80 SECONDS : .34 : .3 BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) o - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT THRU -RIGHT LEFT NORTHBOUND 407 91 SOUTHBOUND 187 233 EASTBOUND 190 44 WESTBOUND 366 223 INPUT VOLUME CAPACITY NEED PHASE? NORTIlBOUND 73 301 N/A LEFI' TURN CHECK SOUTHBOUND 185 o N/! EASTBOUND 35 o NIA WESTBOUND 177 235 N/A MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES . CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS CONGRESS AVE. & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST. AM PIIT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/5/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE B SATURATION 64 CRITICAL N/S VOL 461 CRITICAL E/W VOL 602 CRITICAL SUM 1063 ************************************* NORTIfBOUND LANE MOV WIDTIf 1 R.. 12.0 2 T.. 12.0 3 T..12.0 4 L.. 12.0 5 6 LEFT TIfRU RIGHT NORTIIBOUND 103 252 48 TRUCKS (%) 2 2 2 2 NORTIfBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PHASING N/S E/W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTIf G/C - NB & SB THRU G/C - EB & WB TIfRU LANE GEll'fETRY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND MOV WIDTIf MOV WIDTIf MOV WIDTIf R. . 12.0 R.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L.. 12.0 L. . 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 171 528 32 143 692 89 133 311 24 LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) o o o o PEAK HOUR FACTOR .85 .85 .85 .85 :4. :4. l. 80 SECONDS : .34 : .3 BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITIf OVERLAP) BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) o - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTIfBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 158 332 435 195 LEFT 129 215 180 167 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 103 171 143 133 CAPACITY 72 348 229 0 NEED PHASE? N/A N/A N/A N/! .- MURRAY -DUDECK. ASSOCIATES CRITICAL HOVEHENTANALYSIS CONGRESS AVE. & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST. PM PHT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/5/87 .********************************* LEVEL OF SERVICE D SATURATION 80 CRITICAL N/S VOL 702 CRITICAL E!WVOL 624 CRITICAL SUM 1~26 ************************************* NORTHBOUND LANE HOV WIDTH 1 R.. 12.0 2 T.. 12.0 3 T..12.0 4 L.. 12.0 5 6 LEFI' THRU RIGHT NORTHBOUND 317 687 68 TRUCKS (%) 2 2 2 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PHASING H!S E!W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTH GIC - NB & SB THRU GIC - EB & WE THRU LANE GECl-lEl'RY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND MOV WIDlH MaV WIDTH HOV WIDTH R.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 T. . 12.0 T.. 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T.. 12.0 T. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND -wESTBOUND 229 583 42 153 482 45 LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) o o o o 204 394 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .85 .85 .85 .85 BOTII TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) o - 99 (#PEDS!HR) :4. :4. 1. : 80 SECONDS : .34 : .3 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 432 303 248 367 LEFT 399 192 257 288 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 317 153 204 229 CAPACITY 118 0 0 146 NEED PHASE? N/! NIA N/A N/! MURRAY-DUDECK II ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS CONGRESS AVE. & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST .+DEV. AM PIIT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/5/87 ..*********....***.*********.***** LEVEL OF SERVICE B SATURATION 65 CRITICAL N/S VOL 462 CRITICAL E/W VOL 614 CRITICAL SUM 1076 *******.***************************** LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDru MOV WIDru MOV WIDTH 1 R.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 R. . 12.0 2 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 3 T.. 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 4 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 5 6 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND ' SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 103 171 143 135 THRU 257 530 705 315 RIGHT 102 63 178 48 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .85 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .85 EASTBOUND 2 0 .85 WESTBOUND 2 0 .85 PHASING N/S E/W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGru G/C - NB & SB THRU G/G - EB & WE THRU :4. :4. 1. : 80 SECONDS : .34 : .3 BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) o - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOV~IENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND \VESTBOUND THRU -RIGIIT 161 333 444 198 LEIT 129 215 180 170 LEIT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPlIT VOLUME 103 171 143 135 CAPACITY 70 343 225 0 NEED PHASE? N/A N/A N/A N/A 'MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEHENT ANALYSIS CONGRESS AVE. & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST.+DEV. PH PHT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/5/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE D SATURATION 81 CRITICAL N/S VOL 707 CRITICAL E/W VOL 633 CRITICAL SUM 1340 ************************************* NORTHBOUND LANE MOV \lIDTH 1 R. . 12.0 2 T.. 12,0 3 T..12.0 4 1.. 12.0 5 6 NORTHBOUND LEFT THRU RIGHT 317 691 141 TRUCKS (%) 2 2 2 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PHASING N/S EN PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTH G/C - NB & SB THRU GIC - EB & WE TURU THRU -RIGHT LEFT NORTI-lBOUND 435 399 INPUT VOLUME CAPACITY NEED PHASE? NORTIlBOUND 317 III N/A LANE GEOMETRY SOUTIIBOUND EASTBOmm WESTBOillm MOV HIDTII tfOV \HDTH HOV l.'lDTH R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 T.. 12.0 T. . 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 1.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 L. . 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLilllES SOUTIIIIOUND EASTOOUND \v"ESTBOUND 153 489 89 LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) o o o o 204 402 70 236 597 84 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .85 .85 .85 .85 :4. :4. 1. 80 SECONDS : .34 : .3 BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITIi OVEP~P) BOrr! TURN S PROTECTED (HITH OVERLAP) o - 99 (#PEDS/IIR) CRITICAL LANE VOLill-lES BY MOVE11ENT SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND ~mSTBOUNj) 308 253 376 192 257 297 LEFT TURN CllEC!( SOUTI!EOUND EASTBOUND \VESTEOUND 153 204 236 0 0 138 N/A N/A N/A .-- MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS CONGRESS AVE. & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST.+CITRUS+LAWRENCE AM PlIT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/5/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE C SATURATION 66 CRITICAL N/S VOL 462 CRITICAL E/W VOL 625 CRITICAL Sut! 1087 ..*********************************** LANE GEOME.TRY NORTHBOmm SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE t-10V \VIDTH MOV HIDTIl MOV WIDTH MaV \UDTH 1 R. . 12.0 R.. 12.0 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 2 T. . 12.0 T.. 12.0 T. . 12.0 T.. 12.0 3 T. . 12.0 T,. 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 4 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 5 6 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTIIBOUND . SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 103 171 149 135 THRU 257 530 723 320 RIGHT 102 65 178 48 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTIlBOUND 2 0 .85 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .85 EASTBOUND 2 0 .85 WESTBOUND 2 0 .85 PHASING N/S E/W PEDESTRIAN ACI'IVITY CYCLE LENGTIl G/C - NB & SB THRU G/e - EB & \VB TIIRU :/f. :4. 1. 80 SECONDS : .34 : .3 BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) BOTH TURNS PROTECI'ED (WITH OVERLAP) o - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY HOVEl-lENT NORTIIBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND HESTBOUND TIIRU -RIGHT 161 333 455 201 LEFT 129 215 187 170 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND \IESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 103 171 149 135 CAPACITY 70 343 220 0 NEED PHASE? N/A N/A N/A N/A p::-- MURRAY -DUDECK. ASSOCIATES CRITICAL HOVEl-IDIT ANALYSIS CONGRESS AVE. & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST .+CITRUS+LAHRENCE P~I PHT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/5/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE D SATURATION 82 CRITICAL N/S VOL 707 CRITICAL E/W VOL 648 CRITICAL SUM 1355 ************************************* LAl'lE GEO~$I'P.Y NORTHBOUND SOtITHBOUND EASTBOUND \\1ESTIX)U1lD LANE HOV \lIDTI:I HaV \VIDTH HOV \HDTH MOV mDTI! 1 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 R.. 12.0 R. . 12.0 2 T. . 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 3 T.. 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 4 L. . 12.0 L.. 12.0 L. . 12.0 L.. 12.0 5 6 .TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND \-lESTBOmm LEFT 317 153 207 236 THRU 691 489 412 616 RIGHT 141 95 70 84 TRUCKS (7.) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACfOR NORTIIBOmm 2 0 .85 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .135 EASTBOUND 2 0 .85 WESTBOUND 2 0 .85 PHASI~G N/S EN PEDESTRlAll ACfIVITY CYCLE LENGTH GIC - NB & sn THRU GIC - EB & rffi THRU BOTH l'tlRNS PROTECTED (\\TITE OVERLAP) nOTH w:::t:S nOTECTED (IIIT? OVEP.LAP) o - 99 (iiPEDS/lIR) CRITICAL LANE VOLmms BY tlOVEHEHT NORTHBOUND SOUTI130UND EASTBOUND m~STBOUND THRU -RIGHT 435 308 259 388 LEFI' 399 192 260 297 LEFI' TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTJiOOUND EASTBOUND \lESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 317 153 207 236 CAPACITY 111 0 0 128 NEED PHASE? N/A N/A N/A IJ I A .._._"-"._-_._--_._._-_.-_..~--_..__.~._---,------------ ,.- MURRAY-DUDECK Ir ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & OLD BOYNTON BEACH RD. EXIST. AM PlIT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/4/87 .**********.....*..*..***.**.*..** LEVEL OF SERVICE B SATURATION 62 CRITICAL N/S VOL 566 CRITICAL E/W VOL 558 CRITICAL SUM 1124 *****.*****...****************.**...* LANE 1 2 3 4 5 6 LEFi' THRU RIGHT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND HOV WIDnI RTL 12.0 NORTHBOUND 33, 39 11 TRUCKS (%) 2 2 2 2 PHASING N!S EN PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTII G!C - NB & SB THRU G!C - EB & WB THRU THRU -RIGHT LEFi' INPUT VOLUME CAPACITY NEED PHASE? . NORTHBOUND 138 o NORTHBOUND 33 378 NO LANE GECJ1ETRY SOtmlBOUND EASTBOUND MOV WIDW MOV WIDTH RTL 12.0 RTL 12.0 WESTBOUND HQV WIDTH RTL 12.0 WESTBOUND 12 93 38 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .85 .85 .85 .85 WESTBOUND 184 o WESTBOUND 12 371 NO TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 130 271 71 57 348 61 LOCAL BUSES (If!HR) o o o o : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECl'ED 1. 0 - 99 (IPEDS/HR) : 60 SECONDS : .4 : .44 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT SOUTHBOUND 566 o EASTBOUND 558 o LEFT TURN CHECK SOUTHBOUND 130 670 NO EASTBOUND 57 649 NO - MURRAY-DUDECK a ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & OLD BOYNTON BEACH RD. EXIST. PM PIIT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/4/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 48 CRITICAL N/S VOL 329 CRITICAL E/W VOL 543 CRITICAL SUM 872 ************************************* ,. LANE 1 2 3 4 5 6 LEFT THRU RIGHT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND MOV WIDllI RTL 12.0 NORTHBOUND 42 125 28 TRUCKS (%) 2 2 2 2 PHASING N/S E/W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGllI G/C - NB & SB THRU G/C - EB & WE THRU THRU -RIGHT LEFT INPUT VOLUME CAPACITY NEED PHASE? LANE GEOOETRY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH WESTBOUND MOV WIDTH RTL 12.0 RTL 12.0 RTL 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 49 247 158 90 136 49 LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) o o o o 130 166 21 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .85 .85 .85 .85 : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) : 60 SECONDS : .4 : .44 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVDiENT NORTHBOUND 233 o NORTHBOUND 42 535 NO SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 329 536 543 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 90 130 49 567 375 593 NO NO NO ~ MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & OLD BOYNTON BEACH RD. EXIST.+DEV. AM PHT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/4/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE B SATURATION 65 CRITICAL N/S VOL 613 CRITICAL E!W VOL 560 CRITICAL SUM 1173 ************************************* LANE 1 2 3 4 5 6 NORTHBOUND MOV WIDTII RTL 12.0 LANE GEOMETRY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH WESTBOUND MOV WIDTIl RTL 12.0 RTL 12.0 RTL 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 33 137 59 12 THRU 47 297 348 93 RIGHT 11 78 61 40 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#!HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .85 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .85 EASTBOUND 2 0 .85 WESTBOUND 2 0 .85 PHASING N/S E/W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTH G!e - NB & SB THRU G/C - EB & WE THRU THRU -RIGHT LEFI' NORTHBOUND 148 o INPUT VOLUME CAPACITY NEED PHASE? NORTHBOUND 33 345 NO :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) : 60 SECONDS : .4 : .44 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVFID:NT SOUTHBOUND 613 o LEn' TURN CHECK SOUTHBOUND 137 662 NO EASTBOUND 560 o WESTBOUND 186 o EASTBOUND 59 647 NO WESTBOUND 12 371 NO ... MURRAY-DUDECK Ir ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & OLD BOYNTON BEACH RD. EXIST.+DEV. PM PHT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/4/87 ..************..*................. LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 50 CRITICAL filS VOL 356 CRITICAL E/W VOL 552 CRITICAL SUM 908 .....................*....*******..** LANE NORTHBOUND ~IOV \VIDTH 1 2 3 4 5 6 RTL 12.0 NORTHBOUND LEFT THRU RIGHT TRUCKS (%) 2 2 2 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PHASING N/S EN PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTH GIC - NB & SB THRU GIC - EB & WE THRU THRU -RIGHT LEFT NORTHBOUND 274 o INPUT VOLUME . CAPACITY NEED PHASE? NORTHBOUND 42 516 NO LANE GEOMETRY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MOV WIDTH MaV WIDTH RTL 12.0 RTL 12.0 WESTBOUND MaV WIDTH RTL 12.0 WESTBOUND 49 247 165 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .85 .85 .85 .85 WESTBOUND 552 o WESTBOUND 49 593 NO TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 42 160 28 94 151 53 LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) o o o o 137 166 21 : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) : 60 SECONDS : .4 : .44 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOV~ffiNT SOUTHBOUND 356 o EASTBOUND 552 o LEFT TURN CHECK SOUTHBOUND 94 532 NO EASTBOUND 137 368 NO -- MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & OLD BOYNTON BEACH RD. EXIST .+CITRUS+LAWRENCE AM PlIT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/4/87 .................................. LEVEL OF SERVICE C SATURATION 68 CRITICAL N/S VOL 656 CRITICAL E/W VOL 563 CRITICAL SUM 1219 ...**......**........................ LANE NORTHBOUND MOV WIDTH RTL 12.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 LANE GEOMETRY SOunmoUND EASTBOUND MOV WIDTH HOV WIDTH WESTBOUND HOV \.lIDTH RTL 12.0 RTL 12.0 RTL 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOtITHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 33 143 61 12 THRU 53 321 348 93 RIGHT 11 84 61 42 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .85 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .85 EASTBOUND 2 0 .85 WESTBOUND 2 0 .85 PHASING N/S E/W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTH G/C - NB & SB THRU G/C - EB & WB THRU THRU -RIGlIT LEFI' NORTHBOUND 155 o INPUT VOLUME CAPACITY NEED PHASE? NORTHBOUND 33 315 NO : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECI'ED : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) : 60 SECONDS : .4 : .44 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT SOUTHBOUND 656 o LEFI' TURN CHECK SOtITHBOUND 143 656 NO EASTBOUND 563 o WESTBOUND 189 o EASTBOUND 61 645 NO WESTBOUND 12 371 NO - MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & OLD BOYNTON BEACH RD. EXIST.+CITRUS+LA1VRENCE PM PHT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/4/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 53 CRITICAL N/S VOL 382 CRITICAL E/W VOL 567 CRITICAL SUM 949 ************************************* LANE NORTHBOUND MOV WIDTIl LANE GEOMETRY SOUTHBOmm EASTBOUND MOV WIDTIl MOV WIDTH RTL 12.0 RTL 12.0 RTL 12.0 WESTBOUND MOV WIDTH RTL 12.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 LEFT THRU RIGHT NORTHBOUND 42 187 28 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOlTI'HBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PHASING N/S E/W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTIl G/C - NB & SB THRU G/C - EB & WE THRU TRUCKS (%) 2 2 2 2 97 166 56 LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) o o o o 143 166 21 \.JESTBOUND 49 247 171 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .85 .85 .85 .85 : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) : 60 SECONDS : .4 : .44 CRITICAL LANE VOLill1ES BY MOVDffiNT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 307 382 567 559 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEIT TURN CHECK NORTIIBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLillfE 42 97 143 49 CAPACITY 498 505 362 593 NEED PHASE? NO NO NO NO .- MURRAY-DUDECK II ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST. AM PHT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/10/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 54 CRITICAL N/S VOL 273 CRITICAL E/W VOL 611 CRITICAL SUM 884 ************************************* LANE GErnETRY NORTIlBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTIl HOV WIDTIl HOV wrDTIf HOV WIDTH 1 RT. 12.0 R.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 R. . 12.0 2 L. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T.. 12.0 3 L.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 T. . 12.0 4 L. . 12.0 5 6 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 44 113 162 68 TIlRU 81 74 763 291 RIGHT 24 8 56 123 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 4 0 .85 SOUTHBOUND 4 0 .85 EASTBOUND 4 0 .85 WESTBOUND 4 0 .85 PHASING N/S E/W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTIl G/C - NB & SB THRU GIC - EB & WB THRU :4. :4. 1. 80 SECONDS : .34 : .3 BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (wrTIf OVERLAP) BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) o - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY HOVmENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 128 90 524 186 LEFT 56 145 208 87 LEFT TIJRN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 44 113 162 68 CAPACITY 526 495 249 0 NEED PHASE? N/A N/A HIA H/A J..-- MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST. PM PlIT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/10/87 ..******************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATIJRATION 45 CRITICAL N/S VOL 328 CRITICAL E/W VOL 406 CRITICAL SUM 734 ************************************* : LANE GErnETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTIl MOV WIDTIl MOV WIDTII MOV WIDTII 1 RT. 12.0 R.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 R. . 12.0 2 L. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 3 L. . 12.0 L.. 12.0 T. . 12.0 4 L. . 12.0 5 6 TRAFFIC VOLUMES RORTIIBOUND , SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFI' 87 80 41 87 TIfRU 151 82 398 552 RIGHT 35 8 42 80 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 4 0 .85 SOUTHBOUND 4 0 .85 EASTBOUND 4 0 .85 WESTBOUND 4 0 .85 PHASING N/S E/W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTIl GIC - NB & SB THRU GIC - EB & WB THRU BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) o - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTIlBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 226 100 281 354 LEFT 111 102 52 111 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 87 80 41 87 CAPACITY 518 414 0 100 NEED PHASE? RIA R/A NIA N/A MURRA Y.DUDECK a ASSOCIATES J- CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST. + DEV. AM PHT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/10/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE B SATURATION 59 CRITICALN/S VOL 344 CRITICAL E!W VOL 628 CRITICAL SUM 972 ************************************* LANE NORTHBOUND MOV WIDTH 1 2 3 4 5 6 RT. 12.0 L.. 12.0 LANE GEOMETRY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND HOV WIDTH HOV WIDTH Roo 12.0 Too 12.0 L.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 T.. 12.0 Loo 12.0 WESTBOUND MOV WIDTH R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 55 113 162 75 THRU 93 78 763 291 RIGHT 71 15 69 164 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 4 0 .85 SOUTHBOUND 4 0 .85 EASTBOUND 4 0 .85 WESTBOUND 4 0 .85 PHASING N/S E!W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTH G/C - NB & SB THRU G/C - EB & WB THRU THRU -RIGHT LEFT NORTHBOUND 199 70 INPtIT VOLUME CAPACITY NEED PHASE? NORTHBOUND 55 522 N/A BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) o - 99 (#PEDS!HR) :4. :4. 1. : 80 SECONDS : .34 : .3 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT SOUTHBOUND 95 145 EASTBOUND 532 208 WESTBOUND 200 96 WESTBOUND 75 o H/A LEFT TURN CHECK SOUTHBOUND 113 436 N/A EASTBOUND 162 249 N/A MURRAY -DUDECK. ASSOCIATES J CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST.+DEV. PM PHT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/10/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 51 CRITICAL N/S VOL 397 CRITICAL E/W VOL 437 CRITICAL SUM 834 ************************************* LANE NORTHBOUND MOV WIDTII 1 2 3 4 5 6 RT. 12.0 L.. 12.0 LEFf TIIRU RIGHT NORTHBOUND 94 158 84 TRUCKS (%) 4 4 4 4 NORTIIBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PHASING N/S E/W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENG11I G/C - NB & SB THRU G/C - EB & WB THRU LANE GEOMETRY SOUTHBOL'!:D EASTBOUND MOV WIDTH MOV WID'rn WESTBOUND MOV WIDTII R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 R. . 12.0 T.. 12.0 L. . 12.0 RT. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L. . 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 80 95 15 LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) o o o o 41 398 60 113 552 107 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .85 .85 .85 .85 BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (HITll OVEFUP) o - 99 (#PEDS/HR) :4. :4. l. : 80 SECONDS : .34 : .3 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY lfOVFlfENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 295 116 292 354 LEFT 120 102 52 145 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 94 80 41 113 CAPACITY 505 358 0 82 NEED PHASE? N/A H/A N/A H/! ..-- MURRAY -DUDECK a ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD, & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST .+CITRUStLAWRENCE AM PIIT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/10/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE B SATURATION 63 CRITICAL N/S VOL 400 CRITICAL E/W VOL 643 CRITICAL SUM 1043 ************************************* LANE 1 2 3 4 5 6 NORTIiBOUND MOV WIDTH RT. 12.0 1.. 12.0 LEIT THRU RIGIIT NORTHBOUND 65 104 105 TRUCKS (%) 4 4 4 4 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PHASING N/S E/W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTH G/C - NB & SB THRU G/C - EB & WE THRU LANE GEOME7l'RY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MOV WIDTH mv WIDTIl WESTBOUND MOV WIDTIl R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 1.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L. . 12.0 RT. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L. . 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 85 291 164 113 81 15 LOCAL BUSES (I/HR) o o o o 162 763 72 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .85 .85 .85 .85 :4. :4. 1. : 80 SECONDS : .34 : .3 BOTH TURNS PROTECTED OITTH OVERLAP) BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) o - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND ~'ESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 255 99 534 200 LEFr 83 145 208 109 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 65 113 162 85 CAPACITY 519 391 249 0 NEED PHASE? N/A N/A N/A N/! MURRAY -DUDECK. ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. 8. HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST .+CITRUS+LAWRENCE Pt1 PlIT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/10/87 ********************************** LEVF~ OF SERVICE B SATURATION 56 CRITICAL N/S VOL 428 CRITICAL E/W VOL 489 CRITICAL SUM 917 ************************************* LANE 1 2 3 4 5 6 NORTIlBOUND MOV WIDTII RT. 12.0 L.. 12.0 LEFT THRU RIGHT NORTHBOUND 100 164 103 TRUCKS (%) 4 4 4 4 NORTIlBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PHASING N/S E/\v PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTH G/C - NB & SB THRU G/C - EB 8. WE THRU LANE GEOMETRY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MOV \vIDTII MOV WIlYfH WESTBOUND MOV WIDTH R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L. . 12.0 . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 149 552 107 80 107 15 41 398 70 LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) o o o o PEAI~ HOUR FACTOR .85 .85 .85 .85 BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITI! OVERLAP) BOTH TIJRNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) o - 99 (#PEDS/HR) :4. :4. 1. 80 SECONDS : .34 : .3 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTrlBOUND EASTBOUND \VESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 326 130 298 354 LEFT 128 102 52 191 LEFT TIJRN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 100 80 41 149 CAPACITY. 493 333 0 72 NEED PHASE? N/A N/A N/A H/A MURRAY -DUDECK a ASSOCIATES . :'.,. ~ . CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & 22ND. AVE. EXIST. AM PIIT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/4/87 ****************.**.****.*.******* LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 19 CRITICAL N/S VOL 211 CRITICAL E/W VOL 122 CRITICAL SUM 333 ....*.**********.*********.*......... LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MaV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH . 1 R, . 12.0 T.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 2 T. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 3 4 5 6 . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND . SOlTl'HBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 75 0 102 THRU 98 175 0 0 RIGIIT 90 0 0 43 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .85 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .85 EASTBOUND 2 0 .85 WESTBOUND 2 0 .85 PHASING Nls E/w PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTH GIC - NB & SB THRU GIC - EB & ~~ THRU THRU -RIGHT LEFT NORTHBOUND 117 o INPlIT VOLUME CAPACITY NEED PHASE? NORTHBOUND o 695 NO : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED 1. 0 - 99 (IPEDS/HR) 60 SECONDS : .5 : .25 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT SOUTHBOUND 210 94 LEFT TURN CHECK SOUTHBOUND 75 772 N/! EASTBOUND o o WESTBOUND 51 122 EASTBOUND o 495 NO WESTBOUND 102 495 NO MURRAY-DUDECK. ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & 22ND. AVE. LANE 1 2 3 4 5 6 LEIT THRU RIGHT NORTHBOUND MOV WIDTH R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 NORTHBOUND TRUCKS ( %) 2 2 2 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PHASING Nls E/W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTH GIC - NB & SB THRU GIC - EB & WB THRU THRU -RIGHT LEIT INPUT VOLUME CAPACITY NEED PHASE? NORTHBOUND 249 o NORTHBOUND o 703 NO EXIST. PM PHI' DATE OF COUNTS: 3/4/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 27 CRITICAL N/S VOL 322 CRITICAL E/W VOL 146 CRITICAL SUM 468 ************************************* LANE GEOMETRY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MOV WIDTH MeV WIDTH T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND o 208 123 58 167 o LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) o o o o o o o WESTBOUND MOV WIDTH R.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 WESTBOUND 122 o 73 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .85 .85 .85 .85 WESTBOUND 87 146 WESTBOUND 122 495 NO :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) 60 SECONDS : .5 : .25 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT SOUTHBOUND 200 73 LEFT TURN CHECK EASTBOUND o o SOUTHBOUND 58 662 N/A EASTBOUND o 495 NO '" MURRAY-DUDECK Ir ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & 22ND AVE. EXIST .+DEV. AM PHT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/4/87 **...*..*.*.*..**..*..*..****.***. LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 22 CRITICAL N/S VOL 258 CRITICAL E/W VOL 122 CRITICAL SUM 380 *......*..*..................*....*.. LANE NORTIIBOUND MOV WIDrn LANE GECJoIETRY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MOV WIDTII MOV WIDrn T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 NORTHBOUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND LEFT TIIRU RIGHT o no 90 TRUCKS (%) 2 2 2 2 95 215 o o o o LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) o o o o NORTIIBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PHASING N/S E/W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTII G/C - NB & SB THRU G/C - EB & WB THRU :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED 1. 0 - 99 (IPEDS/HR) : 60 SECONDS : .5 : .25 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT THRU -RIGHT LEIT NORTIIBOUND 132 o EASTBOUND o o SOUTHBOUND 258 119 LEIT TURN CHECK INPIIT VOLUME CAPACITI NEED PHASE? NORTIIBOUND o 655 NO EASTBOUND o 495 NO SOUTHBOUND 95 760 N/A WESTBOUND MOV WIDTH R. . 12.0 L.. 12.0 WESTBOUND 102 o 49 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .85 .85 .85 .85 WESTBOUND 58 122 WESTBOUND 102 495 NO MURRAY-DUDECK Ir ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & 22ND AVE. EXIST .+DEV. PM PIIT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/4/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 31 CRITICAL NIS VOL 389 CRITICAL E/W VOL 146 CRITICAL SUM 535 ************************************. LANE 1 2 3 4 5 6 NORTHBOUND MOV WIDTH R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 LANE GEClffiTRY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MOV WIDIH HOV WIDTH T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 WESTBOUND HOV WIDTH R. . 12.0 L.. 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 70 0 122 THRU 251 190 0 0 RIGIIT 123 0 0 94 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES ('/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .85 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .85 EASTBOUND 2 0 .85 WESTBOUND 2 0 .85 PHASING NIS :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECI'ED PEDESTRIAN ACI'IVITY 1. 0 - 99 (IPEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGIH : 60 SECONDS GIC - NB & SB THRU :.5 GIC - EB & WB THRU : .25 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVOONT NORTIiBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGIIT 301 228 0 112 LEFI' 0 88 0 146 LEFI' TURN CHECK . NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 70 0 122 CAPACITY 680 619 495 495 NEED PHASE? NO N/A NO NO MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & 22ND AVE. EXIST.+CITRUS+LAWRENCE AM PHT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/4/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 25 CRITICAL N/S VOL 301 CRITICAL E/W VOL 122 CRITICAL SUM 423 ************************************* LANE NORTIiBOUND MOV WIDTIi R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 LANE GE<J1El'RY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MOV WIDTIi MOV WIDTH T.. 12.0 1.. 12.0 WESTBOUND MaV WIDTIi R. . 12.0 1.. 12.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTIiBOUND . SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEIT 0 113 0 102 THRU 120 251 0 0 RIGHT 90 0 0 54 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .85 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .85 EASTBOUND 2 0 .85 WESTBOUND 2 0 .85 PHASING N/S E/W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTIi G/C - NB & SB THRU G/C - EB & WB THRU :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECI'ED 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) : 60 SECONDS : .5 : .25 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 144 301 0 64 LEFf 0 142 0 122 LEFf TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 113 0 102 CAPACITY 619 750 495 495 NEED PHASE? NO N/A NO NO MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & 22ND AVE. EXIST.+CITRUS+LAWRENCE PM PHT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/4/87 .......**************.**.*....**** LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 35 CRITICAL N/S VOL 459 CRITICAL E/W VOL 146 CRITICAL SUM 605 ************************************* LANE 1 2 3 4 5 6 NORTIIBOUND MOV WIDTII R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 LANE GEOMETRY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MOV WIDTIi MOV WIDTH T.. 12.0 L,. 12.0 WESTBOUND MOV WIDTH R.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTIIBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 89 0 122 TIIRU 290 211 0 0 RIGHT 123 0 0 113 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .85 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .85 EASTBOUND 2 0 .85 WESTBOUND 2 0 .85 PHASING N/S E/W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTIi GIG - NB & SB THRU GIG - EB & WB THRU :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED 1, 0 - 99 (#PF~S/HR) : 60 SECONDS : .5 : .25 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTIIBOUND SOtITHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 347 253 0 135 LEFT 0 112 0 146 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTIIBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 89 0 122 CAPACITY 659 580 495 495 NEED PHASE? NO N/A NO NO