REVIEW COMMENTS
-1 /{~ ('-, (' ~'rj!, }-.---
{/#ci ~L {6 A'~24;z-
c'r 1 l~ /
, )}L/--rjt:2 -d .,'E.2L tJ-[,./
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-059
TO:
1~~~r~aemA. Parker, City Manager
V~~~ Hukill, P.E., City Engineer
March 6, 1995
*',. ..j i J
ill
FROM:
DATE:
.;"!:'
RE:
TRAFFIC OBSERVATIONS - LAWRENCE ROAD
The 1994 average traffic count on Lawrence Road between NW 22nd
Avenue (Gateway) and Hypoluxo has been reported to us by the County
to be 7972 trips. The current FOOT Level of Service Manual defines
the threshold traffic level for LOS 0 for 2 lane undivided streets
as 13,400 trips.
Those two numbers are important in studying Lawrence Road traffic
because the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering Division has
informed Mr. Hall of this office that widening of two lane roads in
the County system is not seriously considered until LOS D is
reached. Lawrence Road is a County road.
The Traffic Division has also opined that about 1000 more units can
be occupied on Lawrence Road before LOS 0 is reached. Well over
1000 more units have been approved by either the City or County, as
follows:
L Lawrence Oaks 178 units
.... Nautica I 177 units
'- Nautica II 197 units
l.- -Me.:ldowwucd G.LOvt:: ( cl ktt Kno 11 wood1X>.--~~ 5 3 9 units
Fox Hollow (aka Manor Forest) 185 unbuilt units, est.
I.. sausalito Groves 164 unbuilt units, est.
J..-. Jonathan's Grove 32 units
i.- Lawrence Grove 75 unbuilt units, est.
~ Citrus Glen 20 unbuilt units, est.
/.-- Citrus Park 113 units
TOTAL 1680 unoccupied units
The figure 1680 is not propounded to be exact, because each of the
entries marked "unbuilt units" represents our estimate of how many
units remain to be occupied in uncompleted developments. Traffic
from occupied units appears in actual traffic counts totaling 7972
trips. We believe it is reasonable to predict that when all
unoccupied units in all listed developments are in place, the Level
of Service Standard will exceed LOS Standard E, which is 15,000
trips. LOS 0 will be reached when approximately 2/3 of the 1680
future units are occupied.
Engineering Division Memo No. 95-059
Traffic Observations - Lawrence Road
March 6, 1995
Page #2
We have been unable to obtain accurate estimates of revenue
coll~cted from dwelling units now contributing to the 7972 trips on
Lawrence Road. If we assume 1600 dwelling units have generated
those trips, and the average traffic impact fee collected was $1500
per unit, the total fees generated to date exceed $2,400,000. The
total fees due from 1680 additional units will exceed $2,500,000,
representing a total at build-out of $5,000,000I generated by these
developments to be spent in the immediate area. These numbers are
estimates, of course, and should be adjusted for traffic impact
fees generated by other users who pay such fees (commercial, etc.)
and those who don't (schools).
Our conclusion is that it is time for the County to begin planning
for widening of Lawrence Road so that when LOS D is reached, action
can be immediately implemented to begin construction. A four lane
undivided road will support 23,520 trips at LOS D, which is
adequate for all completed and currently proposed development along
Lawrence Road.
WVH/ck
C: LAWRENCE. LOS
xc: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Ken Hall, Engineering Aide
Michael Rumpf, Senior Planner
TA9L2 lA
LEVEL OF SERVICE D
Telt 1 Alternate
Peak Hour ACT Teet 1
LOS 0 LOS D LOS D
F^CILl 'l"t l'~PIl 6'1'I"INDI\.RD CTANDARD 6l'1'AND~
2 lanes undi,.. id9~ 1,220 13,400 1,030
3 lanes two-way 1,280 14 , 000 1,080
2 tanuij one-way 1,600 17,600 2,650
] lanes Cl:1e-way 2,450 27,000 4,000
4 14ne15 undb-idt:cl 2,140 23,520 1,770
4 ].aneu dlv.~dQd 2,'70 29,400 2,210
5 lanes divid.ad 2,670 29,400 2,210
6 lanGs divided 4,100 45,000 3, 330
a lanee dlvided 5,070 55,800 4,170
4- l~neB express'Nay 6,070 68,900 3, 450
6 lanes expresl:I:.ray ',100 103,400 5,170
a l~ne~ expre"way L2,130 131,900 6,990
10 lanes ~xpro~.w~y 15,170 172, 3QO 8,610
So~rce: ?DOT Level or Service Mdnual, Generalized Daily Level of service
Maximum Volumes, Group C and Qroup 1, and Generali~ed Peak Hour/Peak
Directional ~evel of Servtce Maximum volumes, oroup A and Group 1 tor
~rvan1:ed area. (^pril 1992).
~or ~he D~tailed Analysis for Alternate Teet One. L@vel of Service 0 shall be the
Sum of th~ crltical Volumes of onB thousand four hundred (1,400) in accordance
with the Planning Method in the 1985 Manual.
TABLJil 1B
LEVEL OF SERVICE E
teet 1 Alternate
Peak Hour Tellt 1
LOS E LOS E LOD I!:
FACILI'l"f T'r'Pf. ST1\HOMD SThNDM<D STANDARD
:l lafl03i1 undbided 1, 370 15,000 1,280
3 lanAS t',Jo-~lay 1,450 15,700 1,340
2 lanes o:1e-way 1,760 19,300 3,120
3 lanes one-~ay 2,660 29,;100 4,670
4 lanen und!.v1.dec1 2,3'0 25,800 2,080
4 l.snel:l d iv lrle-:1 2,~30 32,200 2,'00
S latloo tl.l()-<lay :2,Q30 32,2QO 2.600
6 l.!nQY divid~d 4.440 48,800 1,890
8 lanes divided 5,550 60,400 4,870
4 lanes elCpr~Bsway 6,500 74,000 3,710
I) lanlJB eXfrc B8way 9,780 111,200 5,560
e lan~~ @xp~e35way 13,050 14',200 ? ,410
10 ld:'\e= e>;pL'=eBWSl)' 16,310 1Q&,JOO 9,260
Sour~e: FOOT Level of SQrvice Manual, Generaliz~d Daily Level of Service
Ha;(imur., Volumes, Group C and Group 1, and Generalhed Peak Hour/Peak
Oi:'Qctional Level of Service Maximum Vclume9, Group A and Group Hor
urban!.~ad areas (April 1992).
5'.:)11: ~h. O...callgd ~na.ly.i.. for "L~oa:'nat:u 1'..t One, Lavel of Servlce I: shall be the
Sum of th~ Criti~a1 Volum~s of one thouaand fLve hund~ed (1,500) in accordance
with the plar.ning Method in thlt 1985 Manual.
The Level of Service Standards for Test Z are Level ot service S 1n Table la.
TOTFlL P.02
Fair Share Contribution for Road Improvements Pee Table
Boynton Beach
,---------------------------------------~--------~-----~~-~~----~--------------~
Description
Road 'e8
Residential
---------------------
Slngle F&mlly Detached
Single F&mily Att. per unit
Congr Living Facil, per unit
MobU. Home
Non-Re8idential
1,650.00
1,155.00
353.93
825.00
\
------------------------------
'General Office
10,000 sq.tt. per 1,000 sq.ft.
50,000 Iq.ft. per 1,000 sq.ft.
100,000 Iq.ft. per 1,000 sq.lt.
150,000 sq.tt. per 1,000 sq.ft.
200,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq. ft.
300,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq. ft.
400,000 8q.tt. per 1,000 sq.tt.
500,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq. ft.
600,000 sq.ft. per 1,000 sq.ft.
700,000 sq.ft. per 1,000 sq. ft.
800,000 sq.ft.& over per 1,000 sq.ft.
Medical Office per 1,000 s~:~~
..~ ..... .-- .......-.-. -----...-
1,353.00
911.90
771.65
699.05
651.75
592.35
547.80
519.75
497.75
481.25
465.30
1,879.35
General Commercial Retail Examples
---------------------------------------------------
.
,
10;000 eq.ft. per 1,000 eq.ft.
50,000 eq.ft. per 1,000 sq.ft.
100,000 eq.ft. per 1,000 sq.ft.
200,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 eq.ft.
300,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 aq.ft.
400,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq.ft.
500,000 eq.ft. per 1,000 eq.ft.
600,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 eq.ft.
800,000 sq.ft. per 1,000 eq.ft.
1,000,000 aq.ft. per 1,000 eq.ft.
1,200,000 aq.ft. per 1,000 sq.ft.
1,400,000 aq.ft. per 1,000 8q.ft.
1,600,000 eq.ft. per 1,000 8q.ft.
Mi8cellaneous
Hospital, per bed
Nuraing Home, per bed
Warehou.e per 1,000 sq. ft.
Hini-warehouse per 1,000 sq.ft
Gen. Recreation per parking apace
General Industrlal per 1,000 8q.ft.
FaIt Food wI Drive 'l'hru per 1,000 8q. ft..
-Quality Restaurant per 1,000 8q.ft.
-High Turnover Sit Down Reat. per 1,000 sq. ft.
Drive-In Bank per 1,000 eq.ft.
Gae Station per statlon
Convenience Store per 1,000 aq.ft.
Hovie Theater per Beat
Racquet Club per court
Church/Synagogue per 1,000 eq.ft.
Day Care Center per 1,000 eq.ft.
New Car Sales per 1,000 sq. ft.
Carpet Stores per 1,000 eq.ft.
Veterinary Clinic per 1,000 sq. ft.
Hotel per room
Hotel per room
Elementary Schoole ~er 1,000 sq. ft.
Hlgh Schoole per 1,eOO eq.ft.
c) -t'L
M ~Il/
~~,~?
, ~
5,069.60
2,822.82
2,215.50
1;1bB..5J
1,648.37
1,479.10
1,403.00
1,359.49
1,360.28
1,359.01
1,384.12
1,398.19
1,431.93
-
647.35
143.00
268.40
143.55
165.00
383.35
12,168.31
4,511.84
9,600.58
7,816.7.
8,639.40
11,162.10
96.80
2,359.50
512.60
3,923.37
2,638.35
5.95
1,804.00
560.45
478.50
589.60
599.50
\
/
L ,~L tot....-1.
v" ",'"
MEMORANDUM
TO: Milton Duff, Chief of Plans Review
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden, Senior Planner
DATE: July 24, 1991
SUBJECT: Citrus Glen Setbacks for Screened Enclosures
File No. 033
The Citrus Glen Master Plan modification, approved by the
Planning and Zoning Board on April 12, 1988, established pool and
screen enclosure setbacks for the three different types of lots
within the P.U.D.; a) lake front lots, b) lots backing up to
Lawrence Road and Miner Road and c) lots other than a) and b)
type lots, as illustrated on the attachments.
To clear up the uncertainty which has arisen regarding
categorizing the following lots within the P.U.D., please
construe these lots to be lake front lots for the purpose of
permitting screen enclosures:
Citrus Trail plat, lot 176
Executive Estates plat, lot 73
Executive Estates plat, lot 86
Executive Estates plat, lot 92
/'
J~J~&~
TJH/jm
Atts.
cc: Al Newbold
Mike Haag
Chris Cutro
MEMORANDUM
October 27, 1989
To:
File
From:
James J. Golden, Senior City Planner
RE:
Citrus Glen - MPM (Road Configuration) - File No. 250
At the Planning and Zoning Board Meeting of October 10, 1989, the
applicant withdrew the above referenced application.
~t.~
ES J./' GOLDEN
JJG:frb
r
-,
FROM
TO Cannen Annunziato,
Planning Director
William Cavanaugh,
Fire Dept. TRB Rep.
SUBJECT: .....Q~tD!~..gl~!L~~t~!..P1~..~.cl:tt:i~~t~Q!!................................................_.................DA TE:...._.[1!I!E?_~_'__:l,.!?_89 ___
~OLD .
A conference was held on the request to delete a major roadway from Phase I
through to the new elementary school. The consensus of this department is that no
modification be allowed to the roadway plan. The road in question is part of a
contingency plan for alternate service to Citrus Glen and the elementary school
should Lawrence Road be blocked for any reason.
PLEASE REPLY TO
.
SIGNED
......
)~~P/C
, Fire Prevention 6fficer I
REPLY
DATE:
SIGNED
Item 1/ F269 Grayarc, P.O. Box 2944, Hartford, CT 06104.2944
@ Wheeler Group, Inc. 1982 THIS COPY FOR PERSON ADDRESSED
MEMORANDUM
TO:
James Golden
Planning Department
FROM:
John Wildner, Superintendent
Parks Division
DATE:
June 7, 1989
RE:
Citrus Glen (Expanded Security System)
We have reviewed the site plan modification request for Citrus
Glen (expanded security system). The following comments are
submitted:
1. The conversion of two roads (previously planned to be public)
to private, in order to provide for an expanded security
system, will restrict local traffic access to the planned
elementary school and proposed five acre park site south of
that development.
2. A goal of the comprehensive master plan is to improve such
access to school and recreation facilities. We concur with
the TRB recommendation to deny this site plan modification.
M
Wildner, Superintendent
Division
CC: Charles Frederick, Director, Recreation & Park Dept.
TRB File
JW:ad
DOC:A:CGLEN
Rf,Cf,"{\1l3D
JU\'\ 'l -
PU'~NH\\G DEPt~ _