Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS -1 /{~ ('-, (' ~'rj!, }-.--- {/#ci ~L {6 A'~24;z- c'r 1 l~ / , )}L/--rjt:2 -d .,'E.2L tJ-[,./ ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-059 TO: 1~~~r~aemA. Parker, City Manager V~~~ Hukill, P.E., City Engineer March 6, 1995 *',. ..j i J ill FROM: DATE: .;"!:' RE: TRAFFIC OBSERVATIONS - LAWRENCE ROAD The 1994 average traffic count on Lawrence Road between NW 22nd Avenue (Gateway) and Hypoluxo has been reported to us by the County to be 7972 trips. The current FOOT Level of Service Manual defines the threshold traffic level for LOS 0 for 2 lane undivided streets as 13,400 trips. Those two numbers are important in studying Lawrence Road traffic because the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering Division has informed Mr. Hall of this office that widening of two lane roads in the County system is not seriously considered until LOS D is reached. Lawrence Road is a County road. The Traffic Division has also opined that about 1000 more units can be occupied on Lawrence Road before LOS 0 is reached. Well over 1000 more units have been approved by either the City or County, as follows: L Lawrence Oaks 178 units .... Nautica I 177 units '- Nautica II 197 units l.- -Me.:ldowwucd G.LOvt:: ( cl ktt Kno 11 wood1X>.--~~ 5 3 9 units Fox Hollow (aka Manor Forest) 185 unbuilt units, est. I.. sausalito Groves 164 unbuilt units, est. J..-. Jonathan's Grove 32 units i.- Lawrence Grove 75 unbuilt units, est. ~ Citrus Glen 20 unbuilt units, est. /.-- Citrus Park 113 units TOTAL 1680 unoccupied units The figure 1680 is not propounded to be exact, because each of the entries marked "unbuilt units" represents our estimate of how many units remain to be occupied in uncompleted developments. Traffic from occupied units appears in actual traffic counts totaling 7972 trips. We believe it is reasonable to predict that when all unoccupied units in all listed developments are in place, the Level of Service Standard will exceed LOS Standard E, which is 15,000 trips. LOS 0 will be reached when approximately 2/3 of the 1680 future units are occupied. Engineering Division Memo No. 95-059 Traffic Observations - Lawrence Road March 6, 1995 Page #2 We have been unable to obtain accurate estimates of revenue coll~cted from dwelling units now contributing to the 7972 trips on Lawrence Road. If we assume 1600 dwelling units have generated those trips, and the average traffic impact fee collected was $1500 per unit, the total fees generated to date exceed $2,400,000. The total fees due from 1680 additional units will exceed $2,500,000, representing a total at build-out of $5,000,000I generated by these developments to be spent in the immediate area. These numbers are estimates, of course, and should be adjusted for traffic impact fees generated by other users who pay such fees (commercial, etc.) and those who don't (schools). Our conclusion is that it is time for the County to begin planning for widening of Lawrence Road so that when LOS D is reached, action can be immediately implemented to begin construction. A four lane undivided road will support 23,520 trips at LOS D, which is adequate for all completed and currently proposed development along Lawrence Road. WVH/ck C: LAWRENCE. LOS xc: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director Ken Hall, Engineering Aide Michael Rumpf, Senior Planner TA9L2 lA LEVEL OF SERVICE D Telt 1 Alternate Peak Hour ACT Teet 1 LOS 0 LOS D LOS D F^CILl 'l"t l'~PIl 6'1'I"INDI\.RD CTANDARD 6l'1'AND~ 2 lanes undi,.. id9~ 1,220 13,400 1,030 3 lanes two-way 1,280 14 , 000 1,080 2 tanuij one-way 1,600 17,600 2,650 ] lanes Cl:1e-way 2,450 27,000 4,000 4 14ne15 undb-idt:cl 2,140 23,520 1,770 4 ].aneu dlv.~dQd 2,'70 29,400 2,210 5 lanes divid.ad 2,670 29,400 2,210 6 lanGs divided 4,100 45,000 3, 330 a lanee dlvided 5,070 55,800 4,170 4- l~neB express'Nay 6,070 68,900 3, 450 6 lanes expresl:I:.ray ',100 103,400 5,170 a l~ne~ expre"way L2,130 131,900 6,990 10 lanes ~xpro~.w~y 15,170 172, 3QO 8,610 So~rce: ?DOT Level or Service Mdnual, Generalized Daily Level of service Maximum Volumes, Group C and Qroup 1, and Generali~ed Peak Hour/Peak Directional ~evel of Servtce Maximum volumes, oroup A and Group 1 tor ~rvan1:ed area. (^pril 1992). ~or ~he D~tailed Analysis for Alternate Teet One. L@vel of Service 0 shall be the Sum of th~ crltical Volumes of onB thousand four hundred (1,400) in accordance with the Planning Method in the 1985 Manual. TABLJil 1B LEVEL OF SERVICE E teet 1 Alternate Peak Hour Tellt 1 LOS E LOS E LOD I!: FACILI'l"f T'r'Pf. ST1\HOMD SThNDM<D STANDARD :l lafl03i1 undbided 1, 370 15,000 1,280 3 lanAS t',Jo-~lay 1,450 15,700 1,340 2 lanes o:1e-way 1,760 19,300 3,120 3 lanes one-~ay 2,660 29,;100 4,670 4 lanen und!.v1.dec1 2,3'0 25,800 2,080 4 l.snel:l d iv lrle-:1 2,~30 32,200 2,'00 S latloo tl.l()-<lay :2,Q30 32,2QO 2.600 6 l.!nQY divid~d 4.440 48,800 1,890 8 lanes divided 5,550 60,400 4,870 4 lanes elCpr~Bsway 6,500 74,000 3,710 I) lanlJB eXfrc B8way 9,780 111,200 5,560 e lan~~ @xp~e35way 13,050 14',200 ? ,410 10 ld:'\e= e>;pL'=eBWSl)' 16,310 1Q&,JOO 9,260 Sour~e: FOOT Level of SQrvice Manual, Generaliz~d Daily Level of Service Ha;(imur., Volumes, Group C and Group 1, and Generalhed Peak Hour/Peak Oi:'Qctional Level of Service Maximum Vclume9, Group A and Group Hor urban!.~ad areas (April 1992). 5'.:)11: ~h. O...callgd ~na.ly.i.. for "L~oa:'nat:u 1'..t One, Lavel of Servlce I: shall be the Sum of th~ Criti~a1 Volum~s of one thouaand fLve hund~ed (1,500) in accordance with the plar.ning Method in thlt 1985 Manual. The Level of Service Standards for Test Z are Level ot service S 1n Table la. TOTFlL P.02 Fair Share Contribution for Road Improvements Pee Table Boynton Beach ,---------------------------------------~--------~-----~~-~~----~--------------~ Description Road 'e8 Residential --------------------- Slngle F&mlly Detached Single F&mily Att. per unit Congr Living Facil, per unit MobU. Home Non-Re8idential 1,650.00 1,155.00 353.93 825.00 \ ------------------------------ 'General Office 10,000 sq.tt. per 1,000 sq.ft. 50,000 Iq.ft. per 1,000 sq.ft. 100,000 Iq.ft. per 1,000 sq.lt. 150,000 sq.tt. per 1,000 sq.ft. 200,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq. ft. 300,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq. ft. 400,000 8q.tt. per 1,000 sq.tt. 500,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq. ft. 600,000 sq.ft. per 1,000 sq.ft. 700,000 sq.ft. per 1,000 sq. ft. 800,000 sq.ft.& over per 1,000 sq.ft. Medical Office per 1,000 s~:~~ ..~ ..... .-- .......-.-. -----...- 1,353.00 911.90 771.65 699.05 651.75 592.35 547.80 519.75 497.75 481.25 465.30 1,879.35 General Commercial Retail Examples --------------------------------------------------- . , 10;000 eq.ft. per 1,000 eq.ft. 50,000 eq.ft. per 1,000 sq.ft. 100,000 eq.ft. per 1,000 sq.ft. 200,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 eq.ft. 300,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 aq.ft. 400,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq.ft. 500,000 eq.ft. per 1,000 eq.ft. 600,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 eq.ft. 800,000 sq.ft. per 1,000 eq.ft. 1,000,000 aq.ft. per 1,000 eq.ft. 1,200,000 aq.ft. per 1,000 sq.ft. 1,400,000 aq.ft. per 1,000 8q.ft. 1,600,000 eq.ft. per 1,000 8q.ft. Mi8cellaneous Hospital, per bed Nuraing Home, per bed Warehou.e per 1,000 sq. ft. Hini-warehouse per 1,000 sq.ft Gen. Recreation per parking apace General Industrlal per 1,000 8q.ft. FaIt Food wI Drive 'l'hru per 1,000 8q. ft.. -Quality Restaurant per 1,000 8q.ft. -High Turnover Sit Down Reat. per 1,000 sq. ft. Drive-In Bank per 1,000 eq.ft. Gae Station per statlon Convenience Store per 1,000 aq.ft. Hovie Theater per Beat Racquet Club per court Church/Synagogue per 1,000 eq.ft. Day Care Center per 1,000 eq.ft. New Car Sales per 1,000 sq. ft. Carpet Stores per 1,000 eq.ft. Veterinary Clinic per 1,000 sq. ft. Hotel per room Hotel per room Elementary Schoole ~er 1,000 sq. ft. Hlgh Schoole per 1,eOO eq.ft. c) -t'L M ~Il/ ~~,~? , ~ 5,069.60 2,822.82 2,215.50 1;1bB..5J 1,648.37 1,479.10 1,403.00 1,359.49 1,360.28 1,359.01 1,384.12 1,398.19 1,431.93 - 647.35 143.00 268.40 143.55 165.00 383.35 12,168.31 4,511.84 9,600.58 7,816.7. 8,639.40 11,162.10 96.80 2,359.50 512.60 3,923.37 2,638.35 5.95 1,804.00 560.45 478.50 589.60 599.50 \ / L ,~L tot....-1. v" ",'" MEMORANDUM TO: Milton Duff, Chief of Plans Review FROM: Tambri J. Heyden, Senior Planner DATE: July 24, 1991 SUBJECT: Citrus Glen Setbacks for Screened Enclosures File No. 033 The Citrus Glen Master Plan modification, approved by the Planning and Zoning Board on April 12, 1988, established pool and screen enclosure setbacks for the three different types of lots within the P.U.D.; a) lake front lots, b) lots backing up to Lawrence Road and Miner Road and c) lots other than a) and b) type lots, as illustrated on the attachments. To clear up the uncertainty which has arisen regarding categorizing the following lots within the P.U.D., please construe these lots to be lake front lots for the purpose of permitting screen enclosures: Citrus Trail plat, lot 176 Executive Estates plat, lot 73 Executive Estates plat, lot 86 Executive Estates plat, lot 92 /' J~J~&~ TJH/jm Atts. cc: Al Newbold Mike Haag Chris Cutro MEMORANDUM October 27, 1989 To: File From: James J. Golden, Senior City Planner RE: Citrus Glen - MPM (Road Configuration) - File No. 250 At the Planning and Zoning Board Meeting of October 10, 1989, the applicant withdrew the above referenced application. ~t.~ ES J./' GOLDEN JJG:frb r -, FROM TO Cannen Annunziato, Planning Director William Cavanaugh, Fire Dept. TRB Rep. SUBJECT: .....Q~tD!~..gl~!L~~t~!..P1~..~.cl:tt:i~~t~Q!!................................................_.................DA TE:...._.[1!I!E?_~_'__:l,.!?_89 ___ ~OLD . A conference was held on the request to delete a major roadway from Phase I through to the new elementary school. The consensus of this department is that no modification be allowed to the roadway plan. The road in question is part of a contingency plan for alternate service to Citrus Glen and the elementary school should Lawrence Road be blocked for any reason. PLEASE REPLY TO . SIGNED ...... )~~P/C , Fire Prevention 6fficer I REPLY DATE: SIGNED Item 1/ F269 Grayarc, P.O. Box 2944, Hartford, CT 06104.2944 @ Wheeler Group, Inc. 1982 THIS COPY FOR PERSON ADDRESSED MEMORANDUM TO: James Golden Planning Department FROM: John Wildner, Superintendent Parks Division DATE: June 7, 1989 RE: Citrus Glen (Expanded Security System) We have reviewed the site plan modification request for Citrus Glen (expanded security system). The following comments are submitted: 1. The conversion of two roads (previously planned to be public) to private, in order to provide for an expanded security system, will restrict local traffic access to the planned elementary school and proposed five acre park site south of that development. 2. A goal of the comprehensive master plan is to improve such access to school and recreation facilities. We concur with the TRB recommendation to deny this site plan modification. M Wildner, Superintendent Division CC: Charles Frederick, Director, Recreation & Park Dept. TRB File JW:ad DOC:A:CGLEN Rf,Cf,"{\1l3D JU\'\ 'l - PU'~NH\\G DEPt~ _