APPLICATION
CCl
fm lli au 0 WI lli rii):
; Ii , I APR 2- 3 ~ , ! ~ !
CONSUlT~bTS, INC. i'.'"
. . PLAlINWG~
Consultmg Eng~~.eers ZQN1f'lG' ,_. _-
Surveyors- "
Planners
2200 PARK CENTRAL BLVD., N, SUITE 100, POMPANO BEACH, FL 33064, (305) 974-2200 · FAX (305) 973-2686
April 23, 1996
Ms. Tambri Heyden
Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
Re: Citrus Park PUD
Proposed Master Modifications
Boynton Beach, Florida
CCL Project No. 3454
Dear Ms. Heyden:
Due to a field survey mistake, the building on Lot 22 of the
above referenced project was incorrectly positioned. The
structure is presently under roof.
Due to contractor placement of pool on lot 32, it is constructed
0.63 over the pool setback line.
Please be advised that we are herein submitting for Master Plan
Amendment for said project. We are proposing to amend the Master
Plan as follows: .
A. Patio home lots for buildings 22 and 23 will be revised from
55' to 51' in width.
B. Side (interior) minimum set back for buildings 22 and 23
will be revised from 15' to II'.
C. Rear swimming pool minimum setback for lot 32 will be
revised from 8' to 7'.
D. Rear screen enclosure minimum setback for lot 32 will be
revised from 6' to 5'.
Enclosed herewith please find the following:
1. Twelve signed and sealed prints for the revised master plan
for the above referenced project.
2.
A check made payable to the city of Boynton
amount of $500.00.
Pw- R (p) ~ n \17-"[--:'"
L!; I2J ...:J II \., w' \
! " 0 r----'''--'"-.-., .
'\J I APR 2 3 1996
Bea;c' h I fWK""'Nr '~".'I"-'~
~\"""""""J
.zOH!N9 DEn _'_~__' .
3. A sketch showing: The existing location of buildings 22 and
24; the proposed location of building 23.
4. A letter of authorization from owner for CCL Consultants,
Inc. to act as agent for this matter.
5. 12 copies survey for lot 32.
We respectfully request that this proposed Master Plan Amendment
be place on the next Technical Review Committee Agenda and thusly
on the next available Planning and Development Board, as well as
City Commission Agenda.
Should you have any questions, or need any additional
information, Please do not hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
CCL cons~ltants, Inc.
, / 1{tIJt:-
ames A. Hamilton, III, P.S.M.
irector of Survey Operations
JAH/lb
Copy: Next Development
CCl CONSULTANTS, INC.
.."..-~''''"'';''''''"''''r' ~: ",':1 \1? ;\"
~ D~ IfJ I:; I, \" \~ i f\
( , ;J; \ 'J u ~"~..._ , \.
Ii -,...) .~~--".._~ '1;\
~ \} ! f-...-~-.~".""g;., ~ '. \ 1
" ", ,,\ \'
,'JUl APR 23199) 1\:
\ PLANNING A~D
ZONING OEPT.
i.
lBoynton Estates
8350 Lawrence Road
Boynton Beach, FL 33436
Tel 407/731-2500
Fax 407/731.5424
19 April 1996
Ms. Tambri Heyden
Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Re.: Citrus Park PUD
Master Plan Modifications
Boynton Beach, Florida
Dear Ms. Heyden:
As Authorized Agent for Next Boynton. Ltd., owner of the development referenced above, please be
advised that I herein authorize CCL Consultants, Inc. to apply for master plan amendments to modifY the
minimum setbacks for lots 22 and 23 as well as the pool and screen enclosure setbacks for lot 32.
Should you have any questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
1QJ~ lte-U..
Manuel M. Mato
President - Next Development Corporation
CCl CONSULTANTS, INC.
Consulting Engineers [t!!.."'.:.'~. .' ....'...
t.", ..
Surveyors' . I) ~.
Planners, .
,
<
2200 PARK CENTRAL BLVD., N, SUITE 100, POMPANO BEACH. FL 33064, (305) 974-2200 · FAX (305) 973-2686
January to, 1995
Mr. Kevin Hallahan, Urban Forester
Recreation and Parks Department
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
RE: Citrus Park P.U.D. (Next Development)
Tree Management Plan
CCL Project No. 3454
Dear Kevin:
This report and the aerial photograph we are submitting with it are sent to your attention, for
review, as required to secure a clearing permit for the subject prcperty. As you are aware, the
site is located on the east side of Lawrence Road in West Boynton Beach, between Citrus Cove
Elementary (south side) and the Citrus Glen Subdivision (north side), backing up to Sunny
South Estates, a Mobile Home Community accessed from Gateway Blvd.
We completed an on-site inventory of the trees subject to the City's preselVation requirements on
January 4, 1995. They are identified and located on the mylar overlay attached to the submitted
50' scale aerial of the site.
The majority of the site as you have seen is overgrown with invasive exotic species; Melaluca,
Brazilian Pepper, Australian Pine, and Earleaf Acacia trees, along with a heavy weed species as
understory (or scrub cover where no trees exist).
A summary of the trees identified for "Preservation" on the aerial are as follows:
A)
2 Clusea rasea (Signature leaf) Trees
~
12'-14' overall with equal
spread, 4" -6"cal.
B)
19 Bucida buceras (Black Olive) Trees
~
12'-24' overall with equal
spread, 4"-10" cal.
C)
7 Phoenix reclinata (Senagal Date Palm) Trees
~
Multitrunk, 4 are small 6'-8'
OAH, and 3 are Large 20'
OAH with a least of 5 trunks
each.
D)
11 Ficus elastica (Rubber) Trees
~
Very Large, 20' + overall
with equal or greater spread,
some with multi-trunk base.
~ .--.. ..~~..__.._--_.__.____._____s-._.______________
January 10, 1995
Mr. Kevin Hallahan
Page two (con't)
E)
F)
3 Sabal palmetto (Sabal Palm) Trees
30-35 Small Oak (Quercus spp.) Trees
G)
15 Medium Oak (Quercus spp.) Trees
H)
1 Large Oak (Quercus spp.) Tree
I)
142 (est.) Slash Pine (Pinus elliottii) Trees
~
8' to 20' clear trunk.
~
6' to 12' overall with 4' to 6'
spread, + 3" caliper.
~
12'-18' overall with 6' to 12'
spread, + 4" caliper located
along the south property line,
east half, back of trailer park
lots. Some may actually be
outside of the subject site.
~
24' overall with equal spread,
+ 6" caliper located along
south property line just east
of ditch leaving site onto
school property.
~
10' -60' overall, with caliper
ranging from 3" to 18", spread
typical for clustered pines.
These are located primarily
along the south and east sides
of the site, at the southeast
corner. A number of these
my be outside the property
boundary but all were
counted to accurately
estimate the quantity
remaining after development
is complete.
Next Development plans to manage these trees in the following manor during site clearing, and
subsequent development of the parcel. On the first day of clearing or before, the Landscape
Architect of Record will meet on-site with the Land Development Contractor, his equipment
operating personnel, and the OwnerlDeveloper's representative to tag and identify trees as
follows:
1. Select which trees can be preserved in place; this includes those that fall oil lots outside
the building envelope, at the back of the lot for example, or in common areas where no
construction interference is anticipated. Trees or areas that fall into this category are
shaded green on the overlay. No grade modifications inside the crown/canopy limits of
these trees will be permitted.
CCl CONSULTANTS, INC.
J;muary'lO, 1995
Mr. Kevin Hallahan
Page three (con't)
2. Identify which trees cannot be preserved at their present location, but due to their size
and high probable success ratio will be relocated to common areas of the site during
development, i.e. project entrance, recreation tract, or roadway corridors. These trees or
areas are shaded blue on the overlay. These trees will remain in place during clearing,
but relocated later when on-site water is available and site development does not interfere
with the proposed locations.
Please note that the Developer will follow tree protection standards established by the Florida
Division of Forestry, by erecting barricades around all the preserved trees and those to be
relocated, before clearing begins. Developer will follow Industry Standards for Root Pruning and
Trimming before relocations are completed.
3. Clear all trees, during the regular site clearing operation, that cannot be preserved in
place, or due to their size are not candidates for relocation. These are shaded red on the
overlay. They will be replaced 1 for 1 of a similar species type, in the common areas of
the site.
After clearing is complete, and a re-inventory of the site's trees has been completed, a landscape
plan for the common areas of the site will be prepared that shows the locations of the relocated
trees and the replacement for all trees that were removed during clearing. Being in these
common areas, the trees will be under the control of the Community's Homeowners Association.
Trees that will be preserved in place on the individual lots, will be protected by restrictive
covenants placed on the lot owner in favor of the HOA
We trust this tree Management scenario meets your satisfaction and you will be able to approve
the project for site clearing at this time. Feel free to call me at our office should you have any
questions on this report or wish to review our findings in the field.
Very truly yours,
CCL Consultants, Inc.
.~~~~
Brett A Nein, AS.L.A
Landscape Architect
BAN:tmc
Enclosures
cc: Louis R. Campanile, Jr., P.E., CCL Consultants, Inc.
Ramiro Rencurrell, Ncxt Boynton Homes
CCl CONSULTANTS, INC.
'l'HJ\CKING Lu(~ - til'1'l~ PLAN H~V.1EW tiUBH1'j"I'AL
PRU,Jl::C'l' 'l'l'l'LE: CITRUS PARK PUD
LJESCRlf''l'ION: MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
TYPE: NEW SITE PLAN
LJA'l'E REC I D: 4/23/96 AMOUNT:
FILE Nu.: MPMD 96-003
MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION
RECEIPT NO. :
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
TWELVE (12) SETS SUBMITTED:
COLORED ELEVATIONS REC'D:
(Plans shall be pre-assembled. The Planning << Zoning Dept. will number each
sheet of their set. The Planning Dept. set will be used to check the
remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match.)
* ~ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
APPLICATION & SUBMITTAL:
DATE:
ACCEPTED
-----BEN I ED
DATE:
DATE OF LET/PER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES:
2nd SUBMIT'I'AL
ACCEPTED
DENIED
DATE:
DATE:
DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER:
REVIEWER'S NAME:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
(Label TRC Departments on each set of plans)
DATE AND MEMO NUMBER OF MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW.
5/2/96 WITH
DATE SENT: TRC AGENDA RETURN DATE: 5/17/96 MEMO NUMBER: TRC AGENDA
1st REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED
Util,
P.W. Y
Parks
Fire
Police y
MEMO # I DATE I "c"
Q&-r70 /~/ C/
~" I~/ V
rJ..l./ I~I / l/
/ 5)'/0 I ~
-:-. I .5, 7 /~
PLANS
PLANS
y
MEMO # / DATE
~ro~~%/ S~30
q -ICf(. /S2'i
"1" -'4', / 5{3()
I
~ C ~;..::31 I~II (~
I "c"
/ e--
I~
I C/
/-
I~-
Planhinn
Building
Engineer
Engineer
Forester
TYPE OF VARIANCE(S)
DATE OF MEETING:
DATE OF LETTER SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS:
(Aesthetic Review App., dates of board mtgs. & checklist sent out wI comments:
NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID:
DATE 12 COMPLETE SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW:
(Must be assembled. Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents)
COLORED ELEVATIONS REC I D:
MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM 2nd REVIEW.
DA'l'E SENT: MEMO #:
RETURN DATE:
2nd REVIEW RECOMMENDATION/DENIAL
PLANS MEMO # / DATE /"R/DII PLANS MEMO # I DATE I"R/O"
Utile I I Planning I I
P.W. I I Building I I
Parks I / Engineer I /
Fire / I Engineer I 1___.
Police / / Forester I I
LETTER TO APPLICANT REGARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS
PLACED AT THE PROPERTY DATE SENT/SIGNS INS'I'ALLED:
SCHEDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD
CC/CRA
DATE APPROVAL LETTER SENT:
A:TRACKING.SP