Loading...
APPLICATION CCl fm lli au 0 WI lli rii): ; Ii , I APR 2- 3 ~ , ! ~ ! CONSUlT~bTS, INC. i'.'" . . PLAlINWG~ Consultmg Eng~~.eers ZQN1f'lG' ,_. _- Surveyors- " Planners 2200 PARK CENTRAL BLVD., N, SUITE 100, POMPANO BEACH, FL 33064, (305) 974-2200 · FAX (305) 973-2686 April 23, 1996 Ms. Tambri Heyden Planning Director City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Re: Citrus Park PUD Proposed Master Modifications Boynton Beach, Florida CCL Project No. 3454 Dear Ms. Heyden: Due to a field survey mistake, the building on Lot 22 of the above referenced project was incorrectly positioned. The structure is presently under roof. Due to contractor placement of pool on lot 32, it is constructed 0.63 over the pool setback line. Please be advised that we are herein submitting for Master Plan Amendment for said project. We are proposing to amend the Master Plan as follows: . A. Patio home lots for buildings 22 and 23 will be revised from 55' to 51' in width. B. Side (interior) minimum set back for buildings 22 and 23 will be revised from 15' to II'. C. Rear swimming pool minimum setback for lot 32 will be revised from 8' to 7'. D. Rear screen enclosure minimum setback for lot 32 will be revised from 6' to 5'. Enclosed herewith please find the following: 1. Twelve signed and sealed prints for the revised master plan for the above referenced project. 2. A check made payable to the city of Boynton amount of $500.00. Pw- R (p) ~ n \17-"[--:'" L!; I2J ...:J II \., w' \ ! " 0 r----'''--'"-.-., . '\J I APR 2 3 1996 Bea;c' h I fWK""'Nr '~".'I"-'~ ~\"""""""J .zOH!N9 DEn _'_~__' . 3. A sketch showing: The existing location of buildings 22 and 24; the proposed location of building 23. 4. A letter of authorization from owner for CCL Consultants, Inc. to act as agent for this matter. 5. 12 copies survey for lot 32. We respectfully request that this proposed Master Plan Amendment be place on the next Technical Review Committee Agenda and thusly on the next available Planning and Development Board, as well as City Commission Agenda. Should you have any questions, or need any additional information, Please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, CCL cons~ltants, Inc. , / 1{tIJt:- ames A. Hamilton, III, P.S.M. irector of Survey Operations JAH/lb Copy: Next Development CCl CONSULTANTS, INC. .."..-~''''"'';''''''"''''r' ~: ",':1 \1? ;\" ~ D~ IfJ I:; I, \" \~ i f\ ( , ;J; \ 'J u ~"~..._ , \. Ii -,...) .~~--".._~ '1;\ ~ \} ! f-...-~-.~".""g;., ~ '. \ 1 " ", ,,\ \' ,'JUl APR 23199) 1\: \ PLANNING A~D ZONING OEPT. i. lBoynton Estates 8350 Lawrence Road Boynton Beach, FL 33436 Tel 407/731-2500 Fax 407/731.5424 19 April 1996 Ms. Tambri Heyden Planning Director City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Re.: Citrus Park PUD Master Plan Modifications Boynton Beach, Florida Dear Ms. Heyden: As Authorized Agent for Next Boynton. Ltd., owner of the development referenced above, please be advised that I herein authorize CCL Consultants, Inc. to apply for master plan amendments to modifY the minimum setbacks for lots 22 and 23 as well as the pool and screen enclosure setbacks for lot 32. Should you have any questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, 1QJ~ lte-U.. Manuel M. Mato President - Next Development Corporation CCl CONSULTANTS, INC. Consulting Engineers [t!!.."'.:.'~. .' ....'... t.", .. Surveyors' . I) ~. Planners, . , < 2200 PARK CENTRAL BLVD., N, SUITE 100, POMPANO BEACH. FL 33064, (305) 974-2200 · FAX (305) 973-2686 January to, 1995 Mr. Kevin Hallahan, Urban Forester Recreation and Parks Department CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 RE: Citrus Park P.U.D. (Next Development) Tree Management Plan CCL Project No. 3454 Dear Kevin: This report and the aerial photograph we are submitting with it are sent to your attention, for review, as required to secure a clearing permit for the subject prcperty. As you are aware, the site is located on the east side of Lawrence Road in West Boynton Beach, between Citrus Cove Elementary (south side) and the Citrus Glen Subdivision (north side), backing up to Sunny South Estates, a Mobile Home Community accessed from Gateway Blvd. We completed an on-site inventory of the trees subject to the City's preselVation requirements on January 4, 1995. They are identified and located on the mylar overlay attached to the submitted 50' scale aerial of the site. The majority of the site as you have seen is overgrown with invasive exotic species; Melaluca, Brazilian Pepper, Australian Pine, and Earleaf Acacia trees, along with a heavy weed species as understory (or scrub cover where no trees exist). A summary of the trees identified for "Preservation" on the aerial are as follows: A) 2 Clusea rasea (Signature leaf) Trees ~ 12'-14' overall with equal spread, 4" -6"cal. B) 19 Bucida buceras (Black Olive) Trees ~ 12'-24' overall with equal spread, 4"-10" cal. C) 7 Phoenix reclinata (Senagal Date Palm) Trees ~ Multitrunk, 4 are small 6'-8' OAH, and 3 are Large 20' OAH with a least of 5 trunks each. D) 11 Ficus elastica (Rubber) Trees ~ Very Large, 20' + overall with equal or greater spread, some with multi-trunk base. ~ .--.. ..~~..__.._--_.__.____._____s-._.______________ January 10, 1995 Mr. Kevin Hallahan Page two (con't) E) F) 3 Sabal palmetto (Sabal Palm) Trees 30-35 Small Oak (Quercus spp.) Trees G) 15 Medium Oak (Quercus spp.) Trees H) 1 Large Oak (Quercus spp.) Tree I) 142 (est.) Slash Pine (Pinus elliottii) Trees ~ 8' to 20' clear trunk. ~ 6' to 12' overall with 4' to 6' spread, + 3" caliper. ~ 12'-18' overall with 6' to 12' spread, + 4" caliper located along the south property line, east half, back of trailer park lots. Some may actually be outside of the subject site. ~ 24' overall with equal spread, + 6" caliper located along south property line just east of ditch leaving site onto school property. ~ 10' -60' overall, with caliper ranging from 3" to 18", spread typical for clustered pines. These are located primarily along the south and east sides of the site, at the southeast corner. A number of these my be outside the property boundary but all were counted to accurately estimate the quantity remaining after development is complete. Next Development plans to manage these trees in the following manor during site clearing, and subsequent development of the parcel. On the first day of clearing or before, the Landscape Architect of Record will meet on-site with the Land Development Contractor, his equipment operating personnel, and the OwnerlDeveloper's representative to tag and identify trees as follows: 1. Select which trees can be preserved in place; this includes those that fall oil lots outside the building envelope, at the back of the lot for example, or in common areas where no construction interference is anticipated. Trees or areas that fall into this category are shaded green on the overlay. No grade modifications inside the crown/canopy limits of these trees will be permitted. CCl CONSULTANTS, INC. J;muary'lO, 1995 Mr. Kevin Hallahan Page three (con't) 2. Identify which trees cannot be preserved at their present location, but due to their size and high probable success ratio will be relocated to common areas of the site during development, i.e. project entrance, recreation tract, or roadway corridors. These trees or areas are shaded blue on the overlay. These trees will remain in place during clearing, but relocated later when on-site water is available and site development does not interfere with the proposed locations. Please note that the Developer will follow tree protection standards established by the Florida Division of Forestry, by erecting barricades around all the preserved trees and those to be relocated, before clearing begins. Developer will follow Industry Standards for Root Pruning and Trimming before relocations are completed. 3. Clear all trees, during the regular site clearing operation, that cannot be preserved in place, or due to their size are not candidates for relocation. These are shaded red on the overlay. They will be replaced 1 for 1 of a similar species type, in the common areas of the site. After clearing is complete, and a re-inventory of the site's trees has been completed, a landscape plan for the common areas of the site will be prepared that shows the locations of the relocated trees and the replacement for all trees that were removed during clearing. Being in these common areas, the trees will be under the control of the Community's Homeowners Association. Trees that will be preserved in place on the individual lots, will be protected by restrictive covenants placed on the lot owner in favor of the HOA We trust this tree Management scenario meets your satisfaction and you will be able to approve the project for site clearing at this time. Feel free to call me at our office should you have any questions on this report or wish to review our findings in the field. Very truly yours, CCL Consultants, Inc. .~~~~ Brett A Nein, AS.L.A Landscape Architect BAN:tmc Enclosures cc: Louis R. Campanile, Jr., P.E., CCL Consultants, Inc. Ramiro Rencurrell, Ncxt Boynton Homes CCl CONSULTANTS, INC. 'l'HJ\CKING Lu(~ - til'1'l~ PLAN H~V.1EW tiUBH1'j"I'AL PRU,Jl::C'l' 'l'l'l'LE: CITRUS PARK PUD LJESCRlf''l'ION: MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION TYPE: NEW SITE PLAN LJA'l'E REC I D: 4/23/96 AMOUNT: FILE Nu.: MPMD 96-003 MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION RECEIPT NO. : * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TWELVE (12) SETS SUBMITTED: COLORED ELEVATIONS REC'D: (Plans shall be pre-assembled. The Planning << Zoning Dept. will number each sheet of their set. The Planning Dept. set will be used to check the remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match.) * ~ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * APPLICATION & SUBMITTAL: DATE: ACCEPTED -----BEN I ED DATE: DATE OF LET/PER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES: 2nd SUBMIT'I'AL ACCEPTED DENIED DATE: DATE: DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER: REVIEWER'S NAME: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * (Label TRC Departments on each set of plans) DATE AND MEMO NUMBER OF MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW. 5/2/96 WITH DATE SENT: TRC AGENDA RETURN DATE: 5/17/96 MEMO NUMBER: TRC AGENDA 1st REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED Util, P.W. Y Parks Fire Police y MEMO # I DATE I "c" Q&-r70 /~/ C/ ~" I~/ V rJ..l./ I~I / l/ / 5)'/0 I ~ -:-. I .5, 7 /~ PLANS PLANS y MEMO # / DATE ~ro~~%/ S~30 q -ICf(. /S2'i "1" -'4', / 5{3() I ~ C ~;..::31 I~II (~ I "c" / e-- I~ I C/ /- I~- Planhinn Building Engineer Engineer Forester TYPE OF VARIANCE(S) DATE OF MEETING: DATE OF LETTER SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS: (Aesthetic Review App., dates of board mtgs. & checklist sent out wI comments: NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID: DATE 12 COMPLETE SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW: (Must be assembled. Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents) COLORED ELEVATIONS REC I D: MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM 2nd REVIEW. DA'l'E SENT: MEMO #: RETURN DATE: 2nd REVIEW RECOMMENDATION/DENIAL PLANS MEMO # / DATE /"R/DII PLANS MEMO # I DATE I"R/O" Utile I I Planning I I P.W. I I Building I I Parks I / Engineer I / Fire / I Engineer I 1___. Police / / Forester I I LETTER TO APPLICANT REGARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS PLACED AT THE PROPERTY DATE SENT/SIGNS INS'I'ALLED: SCHEDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD CC/CRA DATE APPROVAL LETTER SENT: A:TRACKING.SP