Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS r T IfO/L5 c::.t- f IV +F /1 Jr 5 rC j( l}.I- AjoL /)cfc / W:rO Tit of fRFVATI::- j( oA DS I 5f Ti3lrd: 5 ) \) ti,<.\\ ,~"l- :' . I 3~ 0\- y-. O'~'5, T I~E ~ u#D itocASE )rf'? EMU To BE toeA: re D ::r)/ rite foR rF',,)J of Tltf f}/Tk !tAte E Ro!t iJ W tI-+c!f +.5 p fA f3 G+C t fJ1f:F:.C<.f!JCY )rafss ~+!t+Tff) To A- 5:r)./ctt-G f NT R- Jr)JC (= ~ C C,{ L- DES A:c R-kD+u.J !t-DEQ Ll.:tTE ~ PfD ESTR-+Jr-N A-cc r; 55 / 5+ Pf::()/ JrL !::-J; /. 5i3cl :pv),J jOy iY. 2{fJ -f L~rl).::R- To pGfr:R ColvcfR.IJ:r:)Jcc fl-+y){{5Nf Tv ow);fR Fo/< ~ T:r J1 C:;o L [J f)J ~ 0 IT) v); i- ~ 1') C /~ 0-;-- ;7/ I C ~ (:l----- ! (~\. -:2-:1. :~: -'\ ;;e/J/~) I/a IJa ~a 'I ~ ~Va.. . . ih II CJ. Vffw a ur~ vllle JlIf,.,~Itc/~ M. KOfC-:2..; V-c)('-.: _ Z [lCHO~J _.P~L1B 1?1f!!T r I- I\-- )))J :;JJ ( I ELE Plt-vN E 73g -7i-1o P~8r"-) 7 ?!f r' 7 '-/2 , , ? ,.J 1& I? 1< 5 73 ~- 74J1c 736-74B7 /3tf-~/{f Y3J Z" if- ~S-'J e1.16/NEl:!r,e/N6 ;::::; I? 6" fJ..l':;.:"f.!'T~- l ! .,ot....r.,... ~-(~ \ : fJ()Jiu f)~fJr {~c;/l C OJ (~&- -;:) I u ~ L.. I '- W Q (v<....s 73~ .7q~ 0 X d--;). <& fl~~-7l.f2~ I...... . \ , ,- . i ," ! 1 ! /1 Eft of( ItN D cAJ1 d(- foJ (f) [JA-Tf3 To: (~^'.VvytA~ &t...J /1<'. ~ {e. VJ J PI" ~~':J ,,~J z."':'; (J.~- ,F /C f9 /1: C" v""o '" s. A vL '" ~ f i: ' ~ f. p / -1. III '" f:J /), v~ c- fp r . e f ( ~ ~ .. ",l a"'-, f t> e v <- [ p .....0.. f. !< 5: C i f v Vc f P 'I. V h V/ ( W V"e? V ~~ as c',' f V'PlJ" C- (e ~ p h ~ 50- Jl:) - /{u.'" ~J R'I"'~ l- T " f- v. J. c f, ~.. : I?J <.- S ~ C. ~ s. i'\ J <' j , "f {a.-- 8?'~, 1-. '" )Jo: rs,^:".f~ A- F(rv,)"" U, vLF"- ( f .. .- I- vw's (~J I 5 r y ~ u J':J 'f t "- f- f- ~ e r <5 ~ ~ t? !~" {. V' 1- ke, C' f "<5 0-/'] ~ ?(~~VLC~ .fA.Vl/ f /J 'v, ! '(;?' IN< , " f. tee ~ ~ .1.' {., t , 45 (, II <) w S · \I:': ~ C I~! J) e (..., '".... .('~" <) f .1- Cp, vp .~. J f,'ve C s.J C{ L ~<' t?" C [. c(?" v t r {,., L ~ I s /. I ('.{f "'^ t, ",,- W I f- k .~ [~ CI ~ c... V (! 'l.... I"? VI. -L r c;{ eM. e IlL {~ I, e.> I VI E (~ t4<\., '^ {. ,,<(, S c L.. ( "f' \I, f <7 C n J e <(, ( A 'J < "CO" r, c t:?' H k. (A (I ! ~. , ;2 ) i he V, <'! e t C '^ 'A .), CO"" f f v~ w. (06 1'1, /1 J W)I t-k a. ,carve st?~" J':J I vLc .0 "de:' .I VI ,-']V , ~ 5 e Vl 5, 1.7 -f V. w. 3. 6' r of W'.' .II ' ::; . CA lA, fs t'U . . v "'J. V (' t" 'J. cU, J We. (f, J ""', I-~ CJ1 e 'V a. (, v e......' ct "-- 3) e r: "^ e.'''' ~ te i- c.c? "" Cj': f/ n · II Q,"",e < t. ~ 1-. (, Ins Cc/e vt <'~ 5KiJ t"~ · ~!~ ) A J f" V' f [e f ~ 1-, v", ~! s f v (' "- f / ~7" ~ t "'" 1t'f'5'" "" f ,.C Pvt/), (1' ' '5 ., f j- C ~ e':,.~ (~ ,,~Jt0;. VZ-.o H J CM -<(I 1-, \r ~ L ~ Vl.-1 f" v '1--. h. e . [I f V.>t5 P ~ v ~ IrA;). C(tt. be. Vii !" ,,1 A) 1\ 1= ( o "'- l"L i V\ ,e y:. k I. r / /r 4 f OJV'; ~ ,. Go\. vi- ~. V- j e tl'- ! '" "' ~ ,I ( ~ '^ ~ f .,. f e t7'< c:' " >, ' c, C .{ J U ~"' T-ke ~ (, ( ~ VC f .5 j '" S f., {, ( "- l '" V1 J/~ /t #(,J c:. ( L (/ ft. ( , f t'( ,\ V v~ Ie v- ;-0 e f..- k.i fA r B, :+ f ''(4) 1-ke Ju <.~' ~., .. t-f- C, W (, : <. <. {. I., S~ {~,'i t C, .>;V'" v'[" c 5 ~ ( "q ..c ~'l<' r ',~ J v-,J C e v f C t .r.:{ l<H.> f e v (1' (~'" Wt. J," {, ( <. Y' '" v ")n J. e ioJt C.t: :<f 1-:';c~ '" f t- k e c k . :J d ~ vr 0 fC l '" ~J, 1,,, V, <<e T ~ ~ t (WL e VI' U f.5 '" ~ Ie loOp VO C U-f. t L ' .5 t?' v(:'u 5"'e r , ~. l ~ 1- kc c ~ < :J "-f~"- ,f. e of' e t, v IM..' Vl e) ,I. t" S<. C r ~ 'f, \' f'frE~:::",~~C~I) >" ~ ""() He) u{ 5, "- <Nt <-' f., VZ? r."" ""," j / { c < t"." f 1/\ "'" 0 v.,[ < ~'c ;W' 1- C r; 'J f, ." !~ "' fAct", ~ J, K fJ (/ f f [e [q j ~ 0 r 0 v t ~.( ~(e ->) - Q) j . I. 1. , ",-VYQlAh liA <(",...If C{r< d.otl Zo,"",,^ c-O~i^L.JC!C; / ,-' (' ,,' cr II · A_ f! f (' l' , Q (:0-..' I ':' V\. t4A ~. I ~ e I, ~ / i _C,_.~_..,G~ /T ~:' r r ~J i- k.( s ~ L) ,c f- If/' <va e / 10 1- L I< dV 1- ~ I 5 1-- ~c C, f V"> ?: fe . f ( ~ '" "" -1 () ", f /) ~ vel P"'" c ~ I- ;f". C ~ L I, {<< ,vvc " l' t ( ~,' ~ ) eVe (rV c) /r C; v., " ~ J '.5 . F " Je p v' .5 ( .5 ~ A L. fJ'":J t k" y" i) , · It? ~ cc ( l, t k *' f ,-<.5 f I S f L j"""f Sod kr E.5f~ J,-'. eM; (/'1 Lf' ~~cr.v,,-v/ z,;; ~ ~ (< 5 {S I :; ! e 1- f ~ !Nt r 1;;. f-, c ~ ( J?, ~ . / ~ r.) t V1 f'" {"'- q, ~,[ r n " ~, A, L! r J f. L .5'~ f;,. 'c -; /C> c( v (~. l yL f- ,^" S Q << 1-- { ut:I < "" - ~ ! ~ v y je ~. ~o 0 j 0( 6 ~ ( .L {' r F . ;. .., /, I ~ / /, : : ~ c R - A-If , ... S,- 0 ~ e - '-;- fM.,' ;;' Is. t! J ( C "1 t I ~ ' A , "Fr, ~ f f ~ C f" C/ 'c 1- ~ oed l-u1- [e VV"yf f i5- 'fJ i!. V f;'-1. { 0 t - w '/' f 0 v !";,V v~ "'-'" /} U , J ~fAvf f;e v 10 f(e "Y's!} a, Vor.> i",ovv"",-[C ~O~ ) I ,f "'-- L '" \'" 1M eVe' -< IJI vce "' ""5 fA v Y (fJ ?jrt! 0 01 ;1/u v.>,~ n' c 5 ~ Z\Q ~e, A R /\ ( 1J v, c ~ /' I '1 v~ j( u. J!, "' I u I ) r.. P ^ I "< 1/,. -<c L t:<<" ~, , ~~.' \ /. " y" [ t ,,,/ . / l {S v,/, "".5 t. [0 v v C 2>7; I vtj l.s & c ( VI. 1 I vi / . . F" /J2 v P ( t 5 51 (' , I (' C V\.> 1 .,> t ~ , V\.', cv I'f. :; e ~ 'f I 0; 1" c. Cl , (, .-1-c:. "l? '^-1 f K /1-) z. 07 VI.)'^1 c:: vt /-/" f {~d/ ~((Of.(,;'" v~ ~.\ ~5 ( ') I j )1 ,I -----.J. I) tis ./ ' / {Clvt /tLM.<!"". 0"-<,,,,, 7-sJ /(cC:Q"'tji' .5 PlVl i Pc roV\. ) .) I. (1 './ ) , /0 ~ f A-cli.fe:"), x- /3- II"" "" , U VL, I b( v.e & .CIt1]' t f" L f ({/ r(;1) J! { { 7 e ,VI. 'f I {- I t' -1 , - v v (tv '- V\. v c .> c "r Z <.I (,'\. I . VI. J q:;:r e{ "'- -to P G{ D ..il '-- @ (''''{iv<l,~,,'voJ)A~ - f",J~v,- L,,~J dsc~ Tke tl? (, fA", + 'St/"V?:"S'''') 1~V;e~;"~ 1-.t.. /",<<D {. V t'k~ t7~ C'SC D f 5 <A C:S-t-<<" t, ~IV ~ t 1-, v r"J ' + C "'" A.> ~, V c?l ( ~". T k c '^ '" ~ "- ,~ (,_,:;; f' ~, ~ (> Q ~ '~ IN,.t k "'- L ~...{ cL,,- :r "".,I, r'" fy - "F w, 1/ M. f,. C ~. . J e. T h 't?" V c;" f cJ J e ~ f' i)' {3, "f oZ J 7(' It, "; G\ '" '. I- s {"" e v '" c eV C )J-f ~ ~J1 C e {. IA/ .1- C,~ Ii,{, if oZ, o-f We If;. t( ,^, 1.5 CUe. V~'M' Un ' 1'\ ~...., t- ['7 ex, -> 'J L-.!.</ !J e IAf' 1; j(, f' uf, K f, a It." ... --1 ()fU<<./-z.r /'. Ca ~ v" f C K f' v"- PI < ~ - To ( t; T ~ e. {" I{ '" "" K i ('. t?' V c ,,,, f " V C P / ." a. , ' ( , c 5 '" V C v" (Q V" '" I I", f k '-> v c ~. "L r .K 1 Vt: ~, sf. .11 7 ~ C 0)1 P. e JtEAI.s~ V ~ f> ~~o)/ ;;r.o~)c "Vl,,,,j/~Ai<v<':J~ "f t~5'~ cL,;,s.' /( f' "or v ,eJ~ '" -' '^: 1-) C r~ (/ 'V;j.' 'M r?" v rev. '" 1M" ... fl.'" '" If . f' ! . ,1 ' !I\ e ~ k ~ 0 v ~ fj OJ .. \\ 0-. t<{. f' "', v;1] ~ Jy "~jc.' 'P" 't p" ''j ",...J V/-u Vi A r ~1~ "/' L, '/-' U;<< ~ -'W" ?(" WlS Yo .JVVl e e. r f1r-e Vt (:~.5 6J or- ~ VI." 5 C V\ t tK.. Vl.;f '( O'L l- i.{ v(' eft:.~ ( t' Vl t.5 ~ 0 ~ 7) Cr CO)',)," "fe, t C e~ Vv ,vr~',: \1 "'. f V'r, vcr" a '" vc . v, c ,v c "/if I . Vl {<" (, ~ I '.J . iN, t ~'''' VL/ CA/ ,. ~ v, v ~ ~, of ~ Vc (/r, v<1 e ., f !. ;/ Vlf <<vJ 'l"' ,jAr""" Ie V"'J< ~f VuVc" :;..,." W~v ,,"lA' 'f,Cf' (? 7. (( p~. v) e {~v c: F{, c. t' ... I " ... j 5' -. (~ "" '" "Q "'" " l- I r 'L)\ ) W I of- k I <<-1. of- L-t c. c, ~/ ~ (? 7 @) /1<86 E V4 L uJr r:[oN t !Jf.j'>j( J-Is>tL- ^ [ZpoRT 47 3.4.3.3. Neichborhood Parks "Neighborhood parks are Intended to be "walk to" parks so their service area should not be bisected by arterial streets with thoroughfar traffic. School playgrounds In some cases can be effectively used as neighborhood parks. The recommended supply of neighborhood park areas 2.5 acres per 1.000 persons. However, In areas where single family development predominates the standard should be increased due to the larger proportion of school age chi Idren. Three to five acres' Is considered minimum depending on the type and range of activities accomodated. As with mini parks, the service radi I should not exceed a walking distance of one-quarter to one-half mile'"('~#J~\ 47 3.4.3.6. Current and Future Park Needs Summarv -The most commonly accepted national standard of ten acres of park per' ,000 residents indicates that the City of Boynton Beach Is 'deficient in the provision of recreational areas within the city limits. Based on an estimated current popUlation 0136,000. the current need is 10r 360 acres. By 1990, demand 10r park area wi II increase to 570 acres. Compared with the City's current inventory 01 sl ightly more than 60 acres , of parks. it would appear that he City Is greatly deficient. However. b~ I considering several f~ctors relating to use characteristics and planned park projects. this apparent demand/supply imbalance is greatly reduced. ~hen consideration is given to park development potential by park type,lr the region as wel I as in Boynton Beach. It Is concluded that the greatest need Is for the provision of properly located and developed neighborhood parks. In the longer-term future, however, the provision 01 district parks in neWly developed areas wi II increase In importance." ~.1'{-7) o I r r; <1 ,P R (7 P 0 5 ED Colt PRE ff-ENS + V f__ t/--A-1I_ C. Continue to utilize and improve school parks. Public schools in Boynton Beach continue to constitute an important public recreation resource due to the public use of their recreation facilities, and, in the case of the Congress Community School, through the use of classrooms for adult education. As with the ROlling Green School improvement project, all schools should continue to be examined for their potential as sites for recreation facilities. In addition, the recreation facilities of private schools (and churches), should be considered as a temporary alternative for meeting park and facility needs. If located within an area that is experiencing a deficiency in a facility or park acreage, the owners of a private institution should be negotiated with to create an acceptable public use pOlicy, until similar facilities can be supplied by the City. The potential for such a joint program exists with St. Joseph's School, which is located within Neighborhood Planning Area #17. Public use of such private facilities should be secondary, however, to the school's use. As indicated previously, schools supply a high proportion of several recreation facilities, therefore; these facilities should be maintained to ensure that they function properly. Inspections of school facilities should be undertaken regularly and funds allocated for needed repairs and facility reflacements. (~. If- ( S '{'>t? b v t 010 ( vt WI. C ~ I-J J V 0/' i ) v 2. Citrus Glen Dedicated Site (2000) This site was acquired through the subdivision ordinance and should be developed or designed jointly with Elementary School "P", which abuts this site to the south. {r:?' ~J. 5" W~ v f }f; ( "- 1M ~ C< 1-5 J V 0 !. / ) (f) eJ"~ (v, S.2 : T~e ,C If' 5' L Ifc,] v:J", ~"ur t.s ,( ,,-y v, c v, ~ t ,e "'" f~ < ; C 1)" e.5 I V\ dt ceo v !! flC C f+. ., W. /I 1-:yC / . ! .. ( See (I ie IM.""'-o<. ell ~ Q ve .) ~ CM.. 1M. <>t v / R e c <0 v.t lM e V\. ~ or I f? t.1D~ f 1 f'(c:~ tJ 5 (' ^ P H ~ 0 ev, (t1' 1M , ". f s~ L. ~\~ [ej ~ ~ t . ~ '" Fie' lly }J n ! > .? "" we "^ .. v X . !' ( "."'" ~ 0< ~; J 0 te :/' -- I . f,^ ,~ [, j f. 1> ( v,J'!;? Me" ft T L (, f..; ~ i ,~ lr [/'" ~ ~ k . f~ .d 0 w~ fi L fv'C,c "J p ~ v k j), v< It? ,,,"" I- >< L eI~ if c Fe Vc IA c c J CA- (G V(: ). . Q) :r S.5 IA~.> / /) -L...LC0 .> S i 0 V1: s' c> c- l r ~ 1-\ cr.. c.. 7 0 it ' A((7 , ':' r Xc. ~ - z v '\' ~ <P f- 1- ke, c. J e c f J0l Vro / IA 4. "t-(e.,J V f/~ '" v u t- De e v" i '^ ~ 'j I "':' <>.f f' i < ~, k ~' "", ""'-, e ", +5/ ti e c C h' "'1.'. V t'/'> l-{ e J 1- 5' c;{ 1 <'t ( ~..s f C vJ' e {o V I "- V. e I ~ i ~ -f /<. ('.~ {I . '-.-. r \ /.t { I d -r Vl" I r '''( ". > r L '. c. .~ \IV <' " (, Ve 5 '^ ,r V 0 "'1 t-he.WeV'<lV<c "" 5~,L Vn,,;~15' T~u", . ell', :/-. i!1 Ir' ~ t7\.~]J.." e v~ f '^ ~ f I ~., .<0 f f Ce l ''tfi"M 1-5 w ,e L C W" K (. ' V (' .5 ~ I f- { ''i./VI 1-. Lo',y vr u 5 e .y J" V (' (V tM <' " f "- v" PC J I. I v "'-' ef · a. Whether the proposed rezoning would be consistent with applicable comprehensive plan policies. The Planning Department shall also recommend limitations or requirements which would have to be imposed on subsequent development of the property, in order to comply with polIcies contained in the comprehensive plan. ~ I T ~ e V v v '5" J V' 0 Co I/L':J fl' / "; ".-5 I 5 'h ~ ? WI' i ~ ["{j,;,>VC ,e '^-JI VC,/'>c (<''It/# {, C' u W, 'I- ~~Verf L, f "".J'C-{ V<.: CiC> \.-1.~ w. ~ ( I 111. f, "- , L 0 I/L -' I 5 J. "" f '" 1ft "" 'V' I/o ,L " .... -' I ~l t:? (':" ~. i, L' < -\ '" 0 lA, e V" I "1 f k,,{" V" Vlt r 0 vt ~ t /""C L~ r:.ec{v,ul-Iof {,u'(,"1-uJ-5vJ IStt- <:. {f vc:. t1f'C { V c /U vt. G . i C. /\l A V I::: . " .J' /~ Vie/I.. (, 5" c I 110 :p t- CL'! 't-l / ~.1 < I ,L ' C 'I' [/ (' J r( f7 {?-('~V Vi? Vro,,--,( 5cc "t-i<SJV\ el"- " f U~., . (~':t'4 \..~ t!VLlr vet f ! < ~- T" "f II /0 V "- -' "\IM~' '/" f 1'/1 y. < t cu" f,; "~-" {o ~ ((' '-' ~.' 11\ r f) ~ <,7' v" v, .5 ' g., 0) G '" i.r I , C V Ct v, "- i," <1 {~ (,' r. i I~t s ~ (f; b. Whether the proposed rezoning' would be contrary to the established land use pattern, or would create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts, or would constitute a grant of special privilege to ~n individual property owner as contrasted with protection of the public welfare. T~'-t1'~t1,qIJ,v~l,,^,e"1J I~,{""-""'S f'l'^ f 1,>-4 ;t-ke.l e > f '" C li'f ~ e..1 I) <A/ :.J e ,11 f' Ir, V u' .0" 1--, ~ J "- ~ f )1 CA.! ~.~ 't)-(! v~ ~ If\. f1 W'fV](J Vt. ~ ~ ve ~ ,l-e -<)1 50 t.^" t-i) \ j .,,{,.sJ-V( G f IA_V< I ~ 1-. , +0 <<r~'~'~" f C[, ~,~.../o'fU-{V" f [ I v.:J" ... ;'- i I · "- l' F 1- Lev<< (, f, c<v " v ~ J "w e(< '=I U/<J "" C L _, f,e f T tf'vcnr ~ 0 w"" Y cL r 1-- k e f't"c- "'.<"c 0 f 1- L e (."" ~ C t, C iV\ J" "', v "- (. (f) c. Whether changed or changing conditions make the proposed rezoning desirable. enJ: t I,'~ Vcf L vc Vt .},c L2J'J 5, ~<e J- Ce . t?IJ v ~ v ~ ( <' f t- L tV v ~ ' ~ ~ ( I"< <J + t v 0" (.. {<7 V 1-- C e (~fv.; Cr,,, ff fl."",) U,,: f J),~< !'t? v<c. I-. @ d. Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible; with utility systems, roadways, and other public facilities. As", ~ t- C" .} I '" t- L. ~ f t H L. 5,t ~ l f ? f '''' '" e . I'Vl. e )L ~,' C: J r, [J" f ke t? vT 0 -,. . e (, "" ( ,,~ j; ~:Vl c: f t C. t? ~ c t c 'i g ~ j f/ J t. l4( "". . / ~" nu f ~ Il. /-. 0)' o f "'-t? v' v~ h >("(H' Ity" /r1 t. wt eve. {~I 'reJ( e Vt-te Vj C "-LV "'-Lee $5 j", 1- k, , of e v~ !;:;?- ""'-e<< ;. '- / To [3(5 Ca}-tI'L~r/3-D kFTeR f Rile - YitrfF Co){J1G)/J To Ir P P ~;,f-f<. :r AI [; y:: tf:r s :r T IJ; P @ Whether the proposed rezoning would b~ compatible with the current and future use of adjacent and nearby properties, or would affect the property values of adjacent and nearby properties. FI(.,... ~ / A~J ~{' S ~Hl-o or '" ~ f. ~ "? v u <'Ie J <>(,,J f~ tVe IAfe .of"""'/~'C7f",,^- '{l~R~ /"- . O'/vre v, ' '-5 f<' ,v /0 W of e "'-f, Ie Vu,,,,,( e " ij, Ii , , ~p v '- {(;? 1ft< ~ ," t '. If~., we ve vJ. J* '-< P Vr,~ S e.A ~ L' "" '. ~ ~ 1,. p~tCe(",^,[[q .v~,wo~( ?~V'V, "rei;;- v,v ( vt"' tL . ",e> CIl: r '\(c-) 'tlA e. _ 7-<tf v w k, c ~ IS o ,d ; ":' J r 1- ~ e C <7 tv" Co c" S T ve " f f " vt ~ r r; e - - ' . ~ f {t c- t c) ~c? vr ~I ~/ v~ ' V{ e S 6''1 f dt- /CI{(.Cvt! ,,~) ~eH.~rt;Xjfv_"'J. /slj.;rf<~ j" ,ev~ ~:" f"." t ~ ~'" Vi. I ",.. IT <p ~ '1-.-1 f~ t, 5 'J "",' J ( C ...< I, e. @; . v f. Whether the property is physically and economically developable under the existing zoning_ TkG- {L/' Va jv.J We <LL to I? (~~ {. vI 1"- ~f c: t V<5 t;!~" rt f' I ~ 'H"-' C{ ", I /J 0 v"- (p <M.t . "'- d - ws I. v f.keA 1 e V Q ItV'; 1M r " .~ 0 f (~{ s, ~ 1,,- - f de "' " ~ Jot ~ < ~,.) '2 ~ V tJ (" f- i,iA. ~ fA IAI f 5 ~ @ g. Whether the proposed rezoning is of a scale which is reasonably related to the needs of the neighborhood and the city as a whole. I r ~ e{J) Vtlq S e J VU"o "'-':'oj I: /'" q f V"'''SO/~ ~ [~) V e (f ?,) f ~ 1-- Cc VI ee.:r; <17 f f- C t '" e ~ {q ;jt I <'t ~...( f- (, "- ,c f I;r; "'.r "'- Vv!. q /,~ Jj '" t- [, "- . I of P Y f ye fell e f , ,) 0 ~t Q F r ~ e i, .J CO ~ { (, <- vec v L' ~ 'f- r <) Vi .yoHe. ,,~] {~" (, ,/" s. @ h. Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere in the City for the proposed use, in districts where such use is already allowed. T L_ w 0-0 vel c: + v-s c: f'e M +t Wo ~~f, {?' ! ~,~ c'^ VVe '^- f, y, '" If, W5 /0 v)t Cf ole v~ ({? w., " ~ ". f /0 ( .s , ":-.1/ ~ - r... "\' ~ -.,1- '^< [~.1 2 e;o (0 f- t ",e c.(lA, :f-;.." kc ""Jevf;':J ,'ff,':'@ 1<1. fc'5 ~e~c""J. ' rc /-, f, of Cd ~ e v O<5W/" f he vo v 00 f-; I- wo<< ~ f, V"r '" ( vet"''' (, cC" ~ v t '" '" ^ f- k:C' "-, t (, c v" rt 5 r: 5.' te w...;, c.v C 'c. C :c v Vu .fCe.c~ rr k j I ( k k7-, 1- c,,- c' f V"5 t, {c '" de ~J (, f,,:~: f rt /1 k(?' v~J/f < 5 f" E!t . \M.i.' ol -f fl. 7 S-c- C a cJ I f t:t "t...r ~ (..-0 v. .J!~.5 et V\ (1< Ie v"',. J, ve CM e < "5 ~ <> I e !Me J(> "' y a: u C' .5.5 '" 1- ke L r' !- v,t-r> ! <( v Ie ! (Ai) r (~ '" (. @ (ciC' In -' r 0 t-Ls f( J e(,Q(I\;f~C~ <(, t ~ tf<:>~S Ill> c J PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-100 Al Newbold Deputy Building of~tc~al Michael E. Haa~f/~ Zoning and Site ~evelopment Administrator March 30, 1995 ~ Transmittal of Development Orders ;I'O= FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Accompanying this memorandum you will find documents regarding development plans that received final approval. 1. Project Name: Type of Application: Planning and Zoning Department File No.: Staff Report and Comments: Control Plans: Color Elevation Drawings: Planning and Development Board Approval: City Commission Approval: Resolution No.: Ordinance No.: 2. Project Name: Type of Application: Planning and Zoning Department File No.: Staff Report and Comments: Control Plans: Color Elevation Drawings: Planning and Development Board Approval: City Commission Approval: Resolution No.: Ordinance No.: 3. Project Name: Type of Application: Planning and Zoning Department File No.: Staff Report and Comments: Control Plans: Color Elevation Drawings: Planning and Development Board Approval: City Commission Approval: Resolution No.: Ordinance No.: 4. Project Name: Type of Application: Planning and Zoning Department File No.: Staff Report and Comments: Control Plans: Color Elevation Drawings: Planning and Development Board Approval: City Commission Approval: Resolution No.: Ordinance No.: MEH:pab Attachments Woolbright Place PUD Master Plan Modification MPMD 94-003 & MPMD 94-005 28 and 16 pages respectively 2 sheets N/A 9/13/94 meeting minutes 12/13/94 meeting minutes 8/16/94 meeting minutes 12/06/94 meeting minutes N/A N/A Citrus Park PUD Master Plan Modification CNTE 94-002 & #284 8 pages 5 sheets N/A 12/13/94 Time Ext. minutes 9/19/89 meeting minutes 12/20/94 Time Ext. minutes N/A N/A Brisson Medical Office Building Major Site Plan Modification MSPM 94-008 15 pages 4 sheets Yes - Drawings in Planning & Zoning Department 2/14/95 meeting minutes 2/21/95 meeting minutes N/A N/A Brisson Medical Office Building Landscape Appeal LAAP 95-001 6 pages N/A N/A 2/14/95 meeting minutes 2/21/94 meeting minutes N/A N/A a:TrsmtPln.lOO J",J'" .,.r MEMORANDUM October 20, 1989 TO: FILE FROM: James J. Golden, Senior City Planner Citrus Park - Sidewalk Variance RE: The above-referenced request was added on to the October 19, 1989 Technical Review Board agenda and was distributed to Building, Engineering, and Utilities one day prior to the meeting. The other members of the TRB received their copies prior to the meeting. This item was added to the agenda at the request of Roger Saberson, attorney for the owner's of Citrus Park, based upon a request from the Palm Beach County School Board (see attached correspondence). Prior to the TRB recommendation, the Building Department representative (Mike Haag) objected to the manner in which this application was being processed. Mr. Haig's objections were as follows: 1) That this request had not first been submitted to the Building Official for a recommendation. 2) That the fee for this request had not been submitted to the Building Department. 3) That the TRB could not act on this request without a recommendation from the Building Official. The response from myself and other members of the Technical Review Board were as follows: 1) That sidewalk variance requests that were part of a site plan or a subdivision approval had always been submitted to the Planning Department in the past as a matter of convenience. 2) That Chapter 22, Streets and Sidewalks, does not require the variance request to be submitted to the Building Department. 3) That the required $100 fee had been submitted. 4) That the Building Official had ample opportunity to make a recommendation to the TRB pursuant to Section 22-25(b) either through the Building Department representative or by personally attending the meeting. ~ 5) That, pursuant to Section 22-25(b), even if the Building Official had made a negative recommendation, it was not incumbent upon the TRB to accept the Building Official's recommendation. ~ k J1.QL U James J. Golden JJG:cp t I t MEMORANDUM ---------- i. '. October 10, 1989 TO: Betty S. Baroni, City Clerk FROM: Raymond Rea, City Attorney RE: Public Road Dedication for School Access Citrus Cove Elementary School In regard to the above entitled matter, herewith I enclose the original Right-of-Way Deed and ask that you record the same in the Public Records of Palm Beach County. ~~~. Raymond Rea, City Attorney RR/r Ene. cc: George Hunt, Interim City Manager Carmen Annunziato P ~4.. (j, d l? -.L~ " ..:.J-~' C' .t ~ / __',:- ir .. c/ ,. . '.. _..... ..-~ .,.-.-:--- ----.! .,-"". - " , :Ls8 C' )(), ' \ . PLAtH ~(.,'....: , r. ---... ... ----.--~.. ,Wi,' .- ~ t, I ! THE SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, flORI DA 3323 BELVEDERE ROAD P.O, BOX 24690 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33416-4690 407,684-5(0) THO'v'IAS J. MI LLS SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS October 3, 1989 Mr. Raymond Rea, City Attorney City of Boynton Beach P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425 Re: Public Road Dedication For School Access Citrus Cove Elementary School Dear Mr. Rea: Pursuant to an agreement between the School Board, Boynton Nurseries and the City of Boynton Beach, attached find dedication of parcel of land for right-oi-way purposes. Also enclosed find a map showing the access to the school at the northwest comer of the site. This is an 80' right-of- way, being dedicated to the City by Boynton Nurseries and the School Board. A s A. ernment Llalson Growth Management Center AAH:dg Attachments cc: George Hunt Carmen Annunziato WPC3\ES,CCE RECEIVED OCT J 0 JS69 PLANNING DEPT. - - ~ ~ .. J 2: .... t~.~~ i: lIlIi ,()o' :." 1J'l. .C(;t \.. .~ ~ ~ \U :z. .. --q" ~ "- " - , (l. ::; ~ {t~ ')-bI. ~~ "Z< 3~ ~~ ~~ Ft,l Ou ~0 )--;:. ~'.u >~ 3~ J_ ~~~ K,-:: p.)o-\- ~- ~g~ 8"~~ ~~\\:} lU \- UJ ---\:t O~ 0:- :I:t(i 0~ cn~ l,.~w~c..e ~"^D I~ I ...--t,~ I ~ .. ~ 8 \R ~ ~\ ~~ ~~ \l.:)~' tl. \n:;:):::' ~Z\lJ ~:z:-:: <~\- ~~~ "bl\O;I: q~\~ t::!1-~ ,.. I I I \ . cO &) q.. ~ tIl. ~ , ..J -l -= ':Z '< .J t; ~ ~ o ~ == < ~ ~ .~ ~ - ~ 0. ~ I~ '3 ~ \P ,::J. < ~ \ RIGHT-OF-WAY DEED This INDENTURE Made this 2t?z:( Day of --!:~ ,A.D., 19-G., between School Board of Palm Beach County and State of Florida, party of the first part, whose mailing address is 3323 Belvedere Road, Building 503, West Palm Beach, Florida, 33402 and the City of Boynton Beach in the State of Florida, as party of the second part. WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar and other valuable considerations paid, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant, remise, release, quit claim and convey unto the party of the second part, its successors and assigns forever the following described land, situate, lying and being in the County of Palm Beach, State of Florida, to-wit: A parcel of land for right-of-way purposes, lying in Section 18, Township 45 South, Range 43 East, County of Palm Beach, State of Florida, and more particularly described as follows: The North 20.00 feet of the East 310.00 feet of the West 350.00 feet of the South one-half (S 1/2) of the Southwest one- quarter (SW 1/4) of the Northwest one-quarter (NW 1/4) of Section 18, Township 45 South, Range 43 East, County of Palm Beach, Florida. Containing 0.143 acre, more or less. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD THE SAME, together with all and singular the appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise incident or appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, and claim whatsoever of the party of the first part, in law or in equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said party of the second part, its successors and assigns. MLK:dkh 7\27\89 IIIpd8\ronns\rlghtway,doo IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said party of the first part has hereunto set hand and seal the day and year above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA C2~ k~~ c7 /~~~. Arthur W. Anderson, Chairman y.t~ r/ d!~ -----~ /4'/ ~ Thoma~ls, Superintendent STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PALM BEACH Revie~~d : l 8y:(-\ ,') \ ) Office of General Counsel . ), '. ' Attomey I HEREBY CERTIFY, that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the State aforesaid and in the County aforesaid to take aCknowledgements, personally appeared tltU~/~ ~a~ I' " to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and aCknowledged before me that he executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal day of,dr~ in the County and State last aforesaid this d,(;d , A.D., 19 ff . -iJLi~ --l. ~ NOTARY PUB~IC This instrument prepared by: My Commission Expires: , Notill'v Pubfic, State of Rcr'~" . MV Commission Exp;res June i~, ;.'.;; BQpded Thru Troy f.in . lnlurence Inl. MLK:dkh 7\27\89 wpd8\rorma\rlghtway.dee RIGHT-OF-WAY DEED This INDENTURE Made this Zo If Day of ~ r;r/""' , A.D., 19 ?f , between School Board of Palm Beach County and State of Florida, party of the first part, whose mailing address is 3323 Belvedere Road, Building 503, West Palm Beach, Florida, 33402 and the City of Boynton Beach in the State of Florida, as party of the second part. WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar and other valuable considerations paid, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant, remise, release, quit claim and convey unto the party of the second part, its successors and assigns forever the following described land, situate, lying and being in the County of Palm Beach, State of Florida, to-wit: A parcel of land for right-of-way purposes, lying in Section 18, Township 45 South, Range 43 East, County of Palm Beach, State of Florida, and more particularly described as follows: The North 20.00 feet of the East 310.00 feet of the West 350.00 feet of the South one-half (S 1/2) of the Southwest one- quarter (SW 1/4) of the Northwest one-quarter (NW 1/4) of Section 18, Township 45 South, Range 43 East, County of Palm Beach, Florida. Containing 0.143 acre, more or less. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD THE SAME, together with all and singular the appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise incident or appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, and claim whatsoever of the party of the first part, in law or in equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said party of the second part, its successors and assigns. MLK:dkh 7\27\89 wpd8\tonns\rlghtway,<Iee IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said party of the first part has hereunto set hand and seal the day and year above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA '- ~ ~~-Ac~ c;:7 , / ;:l/}/~ Arthur W. Anderson, Chairman ~~. d diyd /....~/~ ~c." :=: Thomas J. Mills, Superintendent STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PALM BEACH By: Reviewed :i { Ii . Office of General Counsel 1 1 . i . Attome.y - I HEREBY CERTIFY, that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the State aforesaid and in the County aforesaid to take acknowledgements, personally appeared 1/,1) !h-~ ~ ~(j I' ~ " to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged before me that he executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this 02LJd day Of# ' A.D., 19/1 -/~ -f ~ NOTARY PUBLIC This instrument prepared by: My Commission Expires: ' Notary ('uMit, State of n~r!tI., My CORlllli$;[.:n Expires Juno 1~. 1'1'!~2 Iond.d lhr... Troy Fain. IDlullnc. inc. MLK:dkh 7\27\89 wpd8\fonna\rlghtway,dee 0Ci - 13-1 ;'01 '~'.'l n 9- .....9,t: ..... -, 1 . l..:l':1I!l~.) L.. t' L_ L_ ' "I f'!:l \..In[:' 6.225 f'9 1 41 '1 Con fG.OO Doc J . "'I tl nll~'I""" "f roM'"~ ""8 ...."I.["IT\I ,... Ghl't c, 12\.IIWLt,i'JLt:N\ - t . i"iJ\!I', 11' tL ~l'7 II: .'_ RIGHT-OF-WAY DEED This INDENTURE Made this ~Ol{ Day of ~;;~ , A.D., 19JL, between School Board of Palm Beach County and State of Florida, party of the I) : \ 4 i( { ~. , first part, whose mailing address is 3323 Belvedere Road, Building 503, West Palm Beach, Florida, 33402 and the City of Boynton Beach in the State of Florida, as party of the . ~ J it second part. , C) '.~ WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of \'I'J :) j, One Dollar and other valuable considerations paid, receipt of which is hereby . , l' acknowledged, does hereby grant, remise, release, quit claim and convey unto the party of t. ~ ) the second part, its successors and assigns forever the following described land, situate, .. '\ ", j .~ '-- ~ lying and being in the County of Palm Beach, State of Florida, to-wit: A parcel of land for right-of-way purposes, lying in Section 18, Township 45 South, Range 43 East, County of Palm Beach, State of Florida, and more particularly described as follows: The North 20.00 feet of the East 310.00 feet of the West 350.00 feet of the South one-half (S 1/2) of the Southwest one- quarter (SW 1/4) of the Northwest one-quarter (NW 1/4) of Section 18, Township 45 South, Range 43 East, County of Palm Beach, Florida. Containing 0.143 acre, more or less. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD THE SAME, together with all and singular the appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise incident or appertainIng, and all the estate, I' right, title, interest, and claim whatsoever of the party of the first part, in law or in equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said party of the second part, its successors and assigns. MLK:dkh 7\27\89 wpd8\forms\rightway.dee ~) J ~;t? ; Office ot the CIty Clerk City ot Boynton Beach p, 0, Box 310 noynton Beach. Florida '.~~ 33435 ORC c!.,225 p';:J 141.2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said party of the first part has hereunto set hand and seal the day and year above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA /))c ~-'-l /~c,<,_ hC1-___ ~,-.,~" / d?'1/t2/~ Arthur W. Anderson, Chairman .1 / >79 a.t. /~ L.A;., L 7 (-",\'. (2\;..-P ~d /L-~~/~ -- Thomas J. Mills, Superintendent t. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PALM BEACH Reviewed: , Office of General Counsel I Attorney - By: , I HEREBY CERTIFY, that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the State aforesaid and in the County aforesaid to take aCknowledgements, personally appeared l/,tV &~'M<< JI~ (j, ~ ~ to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged before me that he executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal in. the County and State last aforesaid this 02L:Jd day of4r , A.D., 19!7 ~~_d~ NOTARY PUBLIC ,. My Commission Expires: .. ;.-;:::::;r~\';;'~'7;:" n.'by r,:/rir, ~1.1tC 01 n~(~:;",i,::,; '~. \:" " lJ'v (:;!~L"j;.~,;:.;H f::~p~res Juno.1:::~",~;:..'_lI!I~ .:~' I 1(/:'" \~. ) . ~ .... /). Bondod lhru Troy hin.. 'n,ui.nCt:i"'f,-i'~,<:'<' r..... . . !~~fi\~\JJ;:;0~;fi :,'01' This instrument prepared by: MLK:dkh 7\27\B9 wpdB\forms\rightway,dee fEOOFI) VERFlEO PALM BEACH roJNlY. FlA. JOHN 8. DUNKlE a.ERK cllCUrr COURT " :..'. , (J-,,{,</u_,\U C)a-+ { i I I i 1 MEMORANDUM I j I 21 September 1989 TO: Raymond Rea, city Attorney THROUGH: George Hunt, Interim City Manager FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato, Planning Director RE: City of Boynton Beach - Conveyances from Boynton Nurseries and The School Board of Palm Beach County re: Ingress to Citrus Park and School Site I have had the legal descriptions which accompanied the right-of-way deeds reviewed, and have found the descriptions to be correct. Dedication of this right-of-way is consistent with the approved master plan for citrus Park. ~ ~~.:- ~~ CARMEN S. ANNU rATO /bks ;' " . .: i I. MEMORANDUM , , August 21, 1989 TO: Citrus Park File No. 247 FROM: James J. Golden RE: Citrus Park - Rezoning ,. On August 15, 1989, the City Commission approved this request subj,ect to staff comments. -1:". t. ~ ES J. GOLDEN JJG:frb f!"': \\ AGENDA MEMORANDUM July 12, 1989 TO: Peter L. Cheney, City Manager FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato, Planning Director RE: Citrus Park (formerly known as citrus Glen II) Please place the referenced item on the City Commission agenda for Tuesday, July 18, 1989, under Public Hearings. DESCRIPTION: Request submitted by Roger Saberson for a Rezoning from PUD w/LUI=4 to PUD with LUI=4 to allow for substantial changes to the approved master plan, including the elimination of a proposed five (5) acre public park, the elimination of a public street connection to Citrus Glen to allow for a private security system, an increase in approved units from 106 to 113, and a change in layout and design of the private street system. This site is on the east side of Lawrence Road, south of Miner Road extended. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval of this request, subject to staff comments, copies of which are attached. . c2..-&.- - I~ CARMEN S. AWflUNZ'IATO CSA:frb Encs ctpk.711 MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC. Trafflc/Transportatlon Engineering Consultants TRAFFIC STATEMENT FOR CITRUS GLENS I & II SITE REVISIONS (CITRUS GLEN II, ALSO KNOWN AS CITRUS PARK) Prepared By: ~~~~~ Daniel N. Murray. P.E. President Motorist Design Data Movement. MDDM Project. 89-017 0~ Date I nc. MARK IV Building' 7491 N, W, 4th Street. Plantation, Florida 33317' (305) 791-6022' (407) 391-6336 . Fax # (305) 791-9533 1 00 Parn~1I Street. Merrill Island, Florida 32953 . (407) 459-2905 . Fax # (407) 459-2012 MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC. TrafflclTransporta"on Englnaerlng Consultant. INTRODUCTION As a result of certain access modifications to the Citrus Glens I & Citrus Glens II site plan, it was necessary to review and evaluate the original traffic reports submitted on these two projects. Specifically. the March 23, 1987 and September 28, 1987 traffic reports were the documents reviewed. The scope of the analysis included evaluating the new daily traffic generated by the latest site plan, calculating the AH & PM peak traffic generated by the new development density, reviewing the access reconfiguration, examining the turning movement modifications at each access. and scrutinizing the recommended improvements. SUMMARIZATION OF THE PLANNING DATA The density factors utilized in comparing the original reports were as follows: The Harch 23, 1987 report included 132 patio homes and 118 duplex units. The September 28. 1988 report included 106 single family dwelling units. The revised Citrus Glen I site plan includes 196 patio homes and the Citrus Glen II site includes 113 single family homes. Based on this data it is obvious that there is a significant reduction in the total number of units actually built. TRIP GENERATION To determine a realistic traffic impact, it first of all to recognize the type of dwelling different dwelling units have a different trip rate. is important unit since The original Citrus Glen I site plan indicated both duplex and patio homes. The duplex had a trip rate of 7 trips per dwelling unit and the patio home had a trip rate of 10 trips per dwelling unit. Based on these trip rates and the aforementioned dwelling units, a total of 2146 trips per day were generated by these residential communites. In contrast the Citrus Glen I that was built included 196 patio homes which results in a total of 1960 trips per day. Based on this computation the final Citrus Glen I development had a reduction of 180 trips per day. ',..., ., MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC. TrafflclTransportatlon Engineering Consultants In analyzing the Citrus Glen II development, the original site plan had a total of 106 single family dwelling units which resulted in 1060 per day. In comparison, the developed Citrus Glen I site plan had a total of 113 single family units which resulted in a total trip number of 1130. Of the resulting differential is a total of 70 additional trips per day. In combining Citrus Glens I & II we find a total daily reduction of 110 trips per day. In addition to analyzing the daily trips it is important to look at the AM and the PM hourly traffic. By scrutinizing the Citrus Glen I development, the AM peak hour traffic was 39 vehicles per hour ingressing and 132 vehicles egressing in the original report. The site plan change resulted in a total of 41 vehicles per hour ingressing and 108 vehicles per hour egressing. This is a reasonable reduction in AM peak hour traffic. Likewise the PM peak hour traffic in the original report was 142 vehicles per hour entering and 77 per hour exiting. With the changes the ingress traffic was 124 vehicles per hour and the egress traffic was 73 vehicles per hour. The after condition again has been reduced moderately from the original traffic figures. Based on tese peak hour comparisons it is evident that the existing conditions will produce substantially less peak hour trips. The assessment of Citrus Glen II peak hour traffic indicated that the existing AM peak ingressing traffic changed from 22 vehicles per hour to 24 vehicles per hour and the egressing traffic changed from 58 to 62 vehicles per hour. Likewise the PM changed from 67 vehicles per hour to 71 vehicles per hour for entering traffic and 39 vehicles per hour to 42 vehicles per hour for exiting traffic. It is obvious that the modified peak hour traffic for the Citrus Glen II development has increased very slightly. Therefore it can be concluded that the change in traffic figures generated by the Citrus Glen II project is very insignificant. REQUIRED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS After recalculating the daily traffic and peak hour trips an assessment of the recommended highway improvements that in the two original reports was undertaken. The improvements are still valid and should be implemented. for any further improvements is not necessary since were made suggested The need the total \ \ \ ; ,I MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC. TrBfflclTrBnsportBtlon Engineering Consultant. traffic was reduced rather than increased. By maintaining the aforementioned transportation improvements the traveling public will not be adverslyaffected by the Citrus Glen Phase I and Phase II modifications. The slight redistribution of trips due to the modified access configuration does not introduce any additional traffic concerns. MEMORANDUM June 27, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato Planning Director RE: Citrus Park Planned Unit Development (approved as Citrus Glen Phase II) - Rezoning Request - File No .2.81- Introduction: Roger Saberson, agent for Boynton Nurseries, A Florida General Partnership, is requesting that the master plan for the Citrus Glen II Planned Unit Development be modified as follows: 1) elimination of the proposed five (5) acre public park which is to be combined with the recreational amenities on the Elementary School "P" site to create a larger public park facility. 2) increase the unit count from 106 to 113 with a corresponding increase in gross density from 3.68 dwelling units per acre to 3.92 dwelling units per acre; and 3) eliminate the public street connection to Citrus Glen and substantially alter the internal street layout and design of the PUD. Copies of the existing and proposed master plans for the Citrus Park PUD can be found in Exhibit "A". For a further explanation of the proposed changes and the applicant's justification, please refer to Exhibit "B". It was the decision of the applicant to submit this proposal as a rezoning, rather than a master plan modification, due to the substantial nature of the changes proposed and to reduce the time necessary to process this proposal if the changes were determined to be substantial by the City Commission (i.e., if submitted as a master plan modification in accordance with Section 12 of Appendix B of the Code of Ordinances). History and Background: Citrus Glen was originally proposed by Alan Miller and approved in two Phases - I and II, by the City. Phase I was sold to Granados Enterprises and is currently under construction. Phase II has been taken back by the Sturrock family after Alan Miller failed to extend his option to purchase. It was the intent of the City, at the time these projects were approved, to provide additional recreation facilities to serve the new developments within the Lawrence Road corridor, consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies 1 for the provision of open space and public recreation facilities. It was also recognized, at that time, that a unique opportunity existed to provide a larger public recreation facility by combining the public park facilities with the recreation facilities proposed for the new elementary school to the south (Elementary School "P"). The joint use of recreation facilities between the City and the School Board is currently undertaken at various sites in the City, including Congress Avenue Middle School, Forest Park Elementary School, Rolling Green Elementary School (recently approved), among others. As both Citrus Glen I and II were both under contract to Alan Miller, it was originally contemplated that both Citrus Glen I and II would dedicate the quantity of land necessary for the park through the parks and recreation dedication requirement (Section 8 of Appendix C, Subdivisions and Platting). After phase I was sold to Granados Enterprises and Phase II was taken back by the Sturrocks, it became clear that this plan was no longer feasible. Therefore, it was decided, at the time of platting of Phase I, that in lieu of dedicating land, the developer would pay cash. This cash payment would then be applied toward the purchase of the remaining three acres or so of the five acre park in Phase II that would be obtained through land dedication upon plat approval. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning (see attached location map in Exhibit "C"): Abutting the subject parcel to the north is the Citrus Glen Planned unit Development which is currently being developed by Granados Enterprises. Abutting the subject parcel to the east is the Sunny South Estates mobile home park zoned RS (Single-Family Residential) in Palm Beach County. Abutting the subject parcel to the south is Elementary School "P" zoned R-1AA (Single-Family Residential). Abutting the subject parcel to the west is the right-of-way for Lawrence Road. Further to the west, across Lawrence Road, is a commercial tree nursery (Boynton Nurseries) Zoned AR (Agricultural-Residential) in Palm Beach County. Procedure: This request for rezoning is being processed consistent with Section 9.C of Appendix A-Zoning, entitled "Comprehensive Plan Amendments; Rezonings" and Section 10 of Appendix B-Planned Unit Developments, entitled "Procedures for zoning of Land to PUD". Comprehensive Plan - Future Land Use Map: The applicant is proposing to rezone the PUD for the purpose of substantially altering the master plan. The underlying PUD zoning with a Land Use Intensity=4 will not change. The proposed density (3.92 dwelling units per acre) falls below the 4.82 dwelling units per acre permitted under the existing Low Density Residential land use category. Comprehensive Plan - Text: The following Comprehensive Plan policies are relevant to this rezoning request: 1979 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN "Provide an adequate range of housing choices." (p.G) 2 "Provide a suitable living environment in all neighborhoods." (p.6) "Provide adequate open space and recreation facilities and programs to meet the needs of present and future residents." (p.7) "Coordinate the provision of open space and recreation facilities within new private development to insure an adequate range of recreation opportunities." (p.7) "Provide for efficient and safe movement within the city." (p.7) 1986 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT 47 3.4.3.3. Neighborhood Parks "Neighborhood parks are intended to be "walk to" parks so their service area should not be bisected by arterial streets with thoroughfare traffic. School playgrounds in some cases can be effectively used as neighborhood parks. The recommended supply of neighborhood park areas is 2.5 acres per 1,000 persons. However, in areas where single family development predominates, the standard should be increased due to the larger proportion of school age children. Three to five acres is considered minimum depending on the type and range of activities accommodated. As with mini parks, the service radii should not exceed a walking distance of one-quarter to one-half mile." (p.146) 47 3.4.3.6. Current and Future Park Needs Summary "The most commonly accepted national standard of ten acres of park per 1,000 residents indicates that the City of Boynton Beach is deficient in the provision of recreational areas within the city limits. Based on an estimated current population of 36,000, the current need is for 360 acres. By 1990, demand for park area will increase to 570 acres. Compared with the City's current inventory of slightly more than 60 acres of parks, it would appear that the City is greatly deficient. However, by considering several factors relating to use characteristics and planned park projects, this apparent demand/supply imbalance is greatly reduced. When consideration is given to park development potential by park type in the region as well as in Boynton Beach, it is concluded that the greatest need is for the provision of properly located and developed neighborhood parks. In the longer-term future, however, the provision of district parks in newly developed areas will increase in importance." (p.147) 1989 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN c. Continue to utilize and improve school parks. Public schools in Boynton Beach continue to constitute an important public recreation resource due to the public use of their recreation 3 facilities, and, in the case of the Congress Community School, through the use of classrooms for adult education. As with the Rolling Green School improvement project, all schools should continue to be examined for their potential as sites for recreation facilities. In addition, the recreation facilities of private schools (and churches), should be considered as a temporary alternative for meeting park and facility needs. If located within an area that is experiencing a deficiency in a facility or park acreage, the owners of a private institution should be negotiated with to create an acceptable public use policy, until similar facilities can be supplied by the City. The potential for such a joint program exists with St. Joseph's School, which is located within Neighborhood Planning Area #17. Public use of such private facilities should be secondary, however, to the school's use. As indicated previously, schools supply a high proportion of several recreation facilities; therefore, these facilities should be maintained to ensure that they function properly. Inspections of school facilities should be undertaken regularly and funds allocated for needed repairs and facility replacements. (p.41 support documents, Vol. 1) 2. Citrus Glen Dedicated Site (2000) This site was acquired through the subdivision ordinance and should be developed or designed jointly with Elementary School IIp'', which abuts this site to the south. (p.42 support documents, Vol. 1) NOTE: This site has not yet been acquired through the subdivision ordinance. Objective 5.2: The City shall provide parks and recreation facilities in accordance with Summary/Recommendation D (see Item #2 above), the Proposed Park Development Schedule, and the Facility Needs summary: Planned and Potential Facility Development (The Citrus Glen II park is shown on the Proposed Park Development Schedule referenced above). Issues/Discussion: Section 9.c.7 of Appendix A-Zoning, of the Code of Ordinances, requires the evaluation of Plan Amendments/Rezoning requests against criteria related to the impacts which would result from the approval of such requests. These criteria and an evaluation of the impacts which would result from the proposed development are as follows: a. Whether the proposed rezoning would be consistent with applicable comprehensive plan policies. The planning Department shall also recommend limitations or requirements which would have to be imposed on subsequent development of the property, in order to comply with policies contained in the comprehensive plan. The proposed rezoning is consistent with comprehensive plan policies with respect to land use. However, the proposed rezoning would not be consistent with comprehensive plan policies concerning the provision 4 of public recreation facilities, as the five acre public park is proposed to be eliminated (see previous section entitled, "Comprehensive Plan-Text" for a summary of relevant policies concerning the provision of public recreation facilities). b. Whether the proposed rezoning would be contrary to the established land use pattern, or would create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts, or would constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual property owner as contrasted with protection of the public welfare. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the established low density residential land use pattern and would not create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. c. Whether changed or changing conditions make the proposed rezoning desirable. Conditions have not changed since the approval of the original master plan for the Citrus Glen II Planned Unit Development. d. Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with utility systems, roadways, and other public facilities. The proposed rezoning would be compatible with public utility systems. Concerning roadways, Section 10 of Appendix C, Subdivisions and Platting, requires that: The proposed subdivision street layout shall be coordinated with the street system of the surrounding area and consideration shall be given to existing and planned streets, relation to topographical conditions, public convenience, safety and their appropriate relation to the proposed use of the land to be served by such streets. The arrangement of streets in new subdivisions shall provide for the continuation of existing streets in adjoining areas not subdivided, (and) the arrangement of streets in new subdivisions shall provide for the proper projection of streets. When a new subdivision adjoins unsubdivided land, then the new street, where necessary, shall be carried to the boundary of the tract proposed to be subdivided to promote reasonable development of adjacent lands and provide continuity of street systems. The approved public road system in this subdivision and the adjacent subdivision to the north (Citrus Glen) provides an alternative access route between Miner Road and Lawrence Road and provides public access to the proposed city park. Access to Elementary School "P" is from a continuation of the north/south public street through Citrus Glen and Citrus Park to Lawrence Road. The alignment and design of this intersection was negotiated and agreed upon by the School Board, the 5 \!, . ~ ;1 \ sturrock family, and the City. The agreement reached involved rights-of-way dedications, easement dedications, utility construction, turn-lane construction and dollar contributions. Approval of this request would change the basis for approval of this agreement and review of this proposal by the School Board is recommended. In addition to the above, the proposed elimination of the public road system and the installation of a private security system may impede emergency access to these developments, as outlined in the attached staff comments in Exhibit "0" from the Fire Department and the Police Department. e. Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with the current and future use of adjacent and nearby properties, or would affect the property values of adjacent and nearby properties. From a land use standpoint, the proposed rezoning would be compatible with the current and future use of adjacent and nearby properties for low density residential development. However, the proposed elimination of the public park would deprive property owners in the vicinity of needed public recreation space, the demand for which is outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. The affect on property values of adjacent and nearby properties is difficult to evaluate, but the impact is not anticipated to be significant. f. Whether the property is physically and economically developable under the existing zoning. The approved master plan for the Citrus Glen II Planned Unit Development allows for the development of 106 single-family detached zero lot line units. g. Whether the proposed rezoning is of a scale which is reasonably related to the needs of the neighborhood and the city as a whole. The proposed rezoning is of a scale which is reasonably related to the needs of the neighborhood and the City as a whole. h. Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere in the City for the proposed use, in districts where such use is already allowed. The approved Citrus Glen II master plan currently allows for the development of 106 single-family detached zero lot line units. The underlying issue in this rezoning petition concerns whether or not it would be acceptable to eliminate the proposed five acre public park and the public road system which serves the park, links the Citrus Glen and Citrus Park projects to Elementary School "P", and provides an alternative means of emergency access to the Citrus Park PUD. Conclusions/Recommendations: The proposed rezoning is consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies with respect to land use. However, the proposed elimination of the five acre public park wou~d be inconsistent with Comprehensive Plan policies concerning the provision 6 of public recreation facilities. In addition, elimination of the north/south public road connection would be inconsistent with the provision of public recreation facilities and the intent of Section 10, "Streets" of Appendix C, Subdivisions and Platting. Elimination of the public street connection would change the basis for approval for the Lawrence Road intersection design between the School Board, the Sturrocks, and the City and may also impede the provision of alternative emergency access to these developments. Based on the above, it is recommended that the application for rezoning submitted by Roger Saberson should be denied. PROJECT APPROVAL If it is the decision of the Planning and Zoning Board to recommend approval or the City Commission to approve this request, the Planning Department recommends that the rezoning be approved subject to the attached staff comments in Exhibit "D", with the exception of those comments that recommend against the approval of this request. C.~~E;'- S~~ JJG:frb Encs cc: Central File citpkpud 7 MEMORANDUM- Mr. James Golden DATIE 23 June 1989 P'IL. M Lt. Dale S. Hammack IIU8JlECT Citrus Park (PI I Citrus Glen) Per our discussion at the Technical Review Board Meeting of 21 June 1989, I am recommending the following. 1. From a public safety stand that emergency access be provided for the Citrus Glen (P-I) to allow more than one point of entry. ~o!:L? . DSH: tm Tc9 [3 r: t- t: V-+'5 e C> "plSP ~~r~c.c:; MEMORANDUM To: Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director r Ut111tles~. From: John A. Guidry, Director of Date: June 23, 1989 Subject: TRB Review - Rezoning for Citrus Park - PUD with Master Plan The subject rezoning includes a master plan for which we offer the following comments. 1. The water main routing shall be revised to promote an even circulation of water through the subdivision. Configurations resulting in a dead-end or a looped line with a single feed point shall be eliminated as these are detrimental to water qua 1 it Y . 2. Correct the sewer plan to indicate a proposed 15" diameter sewer main on the west side of Lawrence Road, with only the road crossing stub being 1011 in diameter. 3. Identify the easement width between lots 14 and 15 for the sanitary sewer. We recommend a width of twice the depth, plus eight feet. This results in a 30 feet wide easement, which will allow our personnel to make a point repair safely, should the need arise in the future. If you desire a narrower easement, please submit an engineering evaluation, with calculations, in support of your proposal. cmd xc: Peter Mazzella ( c; It J1l::: }/'rS r-Jv/c 0 R po K ;t{--[5j) -.. , { I' MEMORANDUM ,I i,' "",- . f " TO: Mr. Carmen Annunziato Planning Director DATE: June 12, 1989 FROM: Betty S. Boroni City Clerk Planning & Zoning Board Meeting of July 11, 1989 RE: '" Attached please find a copy of the Notice of Public Hearing for the rezoning of Citrus Park. This is scheduled to be advertised in The Post on June 25 and July 2 and notices were mailed on June 9. The three parking lot variance notices will be forthcoming which are scheduled for the same meeting and will be advertised on June 22 and 29 in the Boynton Beach News. B1!:f:B!~ BSB/smk Attachment cc: City Manager 'r"'!" ~,-.. -"':".~"._..""--'-'" ~\ ...~' r. ;'~: .' :. '-'I. , ~""._..,--.. MEMORANDUM May 26, 1989 FROM: Betty BOFoni, City Clerk James J. Golden, Senior City planner TO: RE: ..... Citrus Park (f/k/a Citrus Glen II) - Rezoning From PUD w/LUI=4 to PUD w/LUI=4 Accompanying this memorandum you will find a copy of the application and relat~d documents for the above-referenced request. Also enclosed is a check in the amount of $1,200 to cover the review and processing of this application. Please advertise this request for a public hearing before the planning and Zoning Board at the July 11, 19890meeting and before the ICity Commission at the July 18, 1989 meeting. A map advertisement is not required, as there is no land use change proposed. J;:;;:j;: ~ JJG:frb Encs BB.526 u , __...._____...___,_..._______________--1___,___ .'1 1'f'-' " -'!'~-'_~ f,,-, t I ,/ MEMORANDUM ) '. ..J" 7 June 1988 TO: Peter L. Cheney, City Manager FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato, Planning Director RE: Continuation of Public Hearings, Properties on West Side of US-1, Citrus Park, Elementary School P and Lawrence Lakes Please be advised that the economic analysis of the uses of land along the US-1 corridor has not been received from Walter H. Keller and Associates within the time frame previously anticipated. This has resulted in the need to continue the public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Board for the change in future land use and zoning for the properties along the west side of US-1 to July 12, 1988. Changing this schedule will require that the City Commission continue its public hearings on the above-mentioned topics to the Commission meeting of July 19, 1988 in order to allow for a complete submission to the State Department of Community Affairs. Therefore, when these items come up on the Commission's June 21st agenda, please have the Mayor announce that th~ hearings on all four projects have been continued to July 19, 1988 at 8:00 PM or -as soon thereafter as the agenda permits at the City Commission Chambers, 211 South Federal Highway, Boynton Beach, Florida. C~ARMEN S~TO /bks I I MEMORANDUM October 19, 1989 FROM: File James J. Golden, Senior City Planner ~ ~ (~ citrus Park - Sidewalk Variance - ~ a?tr TO: RE: On this date, the Technical Review Board approved the attached request sUbject to the following stipulations: 1) That the sidewalk on the south side of the entrance road not be required east of the driveway connection to Elementary School "P" to the recreation center parking lot. The sidewalk along the remaining portions of the entrance road must be constructed, however. 2) A sidewalk or bikepath be provided through the recreation area to connect that portion of the development east of the recreation area to the pedestrian access system and the school entrance which lies to the west of the recreation area. ~i.~ (JAMES f. GOLDEN JJG:cp cc : TRB Roger Saberson Rick Rossi David H. Williams LAW OFFICES OF ROGER G. SABERSON, P.A. DELRA Y EXECUTIVE MALL 110 EAST ATLANTIC AVENUE DELRA Y BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (407) 272-8616 October 17, 1989 Mr. Jim Golden, Planner City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Boynton Beach, Florida Blvd. 33425 Re: Citrus Park - Waiver of Sidewalk Requirement for Small Area on the South- side of Entrance Road Dear Jim: Pursuant to our phone conversation of October 17, 1989 I hereby reconfirm my request made to Mr. Annunziato, September 27, 1989 that the City of Boynton Beach waive any sidewalk requirement for the south side of the entrance road east of the north/south entry to the elementary school site. As I indicated to you, the Palm Beach County School system has requested that we delete the sidewalk in this area as they would prefer a hedge and/or other landscape buffering. I enclose for your reference a duplicate copy of the letter from David H. Williams to Carmen Annunziato dated September 27, 1989 indicating the School Board's request for the deletion of the sidewalk. We are attempting to wrap up all of the remaining issues with the School Board so that we can implement the various exchanges of easements that need to occur and the conveyance to the City of Boynton Beach of the area for the entrance road. It is my understanding that you will present this request to the Technical Review Board on Thursday October 19, 1989, at approximately 11:00 to 11:30 a.m. I enclose my check made payable to the City of Boynton Beach in the amount of $100.00 for the City's consideration of this request. Thank you for your cooperation. With regards, 1Jr/4 ~ RECEIVED' Roger G. Saberson Attorney at Law OCT 18 1989 PLANNLNG DEPTI enclosure c: Mr. James Sturrock Mr. Drennan Whitmire ...-.11 .. L__ ,. "'-"- (@OQ~ ~..~ ~ IJI t' 8EACH ~ _:~~!i-'3!~~:::-:~'I.."':"'(~"" THE SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA 3323 BELVEDERE ROAD P,O. BOX 24690 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33416-4690 407.684-5CXXl THOMAS J. MI LLS SUPERINTENDENT DF SCHOOLS September 27, 1989 MEMORANDUM Mr. Carmen Annunziato, Director of Planning City of Boynton Beach 200 No. Seacrest Boulevard Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Re: Citrus Park PUD Elementary "P" Please be advised that the School Board staff has reviewed the site plan submitted for Citrus Park PUD. Because of the layout of this project, the School Board recommends that no sidewalk be provided on the south side of the entry road to the project east of the entry to the elementary school. This will encourage all pedestrians to the school to cross at an identified crossing. Very truly yours, f)~~ David H. Williams, Assistant Director Growth Management Center DHW:dg cc: Agustin A. Hernandez WPC3\ES\SITE.PE -~~.'.I-__,>:~ :~::'~_~!.-.:~_!"t~~r:~:.'.:~ .:'~~~':-:~-- _._---_:.~--""--,.._,.-