The URL can be used to link to this page

AGENDA DOCUMENTS AGENDA DOCUMENTS PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-187 FROM: carrie parke:t.5;~~ Manager T~~:yd'~-Planning Zoning Director and TO: DATE: June 15, 1994 SUBJECT: Citrus Glen list of outstanding items - Respons~ to City Manager Memo No. 94-214 The following is a response to your request of June 7, 1994 (Memo No. 94-214) for a status report of the outstanding items from Jim Cherof's March 7, 1994 letter to Mr. Granados, developer of Citrus Glen PUD: 1. Construction of a barrier fence along the northeast corner of the development. (Building and Planning and Zoning related) - No permit has been applied for or issued. 2. Replacement of landscape material in accordance with the approved development plans. This includes the replanting of damaged or destroyed trees and bushes. (City Forester and Planning and Zoning related). The Building Department did not require permits for the landscaping as was the system at the time; the current system does require a separate landscape permit to be pulled. Kevin Hallahan, City Forester, has never been called to do a landscape inspection, most likely because there is no separate permit. Staff is aware, however, that the existing landscaping does not conform to the approved plans. Kevin states that former City Manager, J. Scott Miller, relinquished Mr. Granados from having to comply with this requirement pursuant to a meeting with Mr. Granados, Don Jaeger and Mr. Miller. 3. Paint or repaint roadway traffic markings. (Engineering Department related). 4. Construction of a gate on Miner Road. (Building and Planning and Zoning Department related) -No permit has been issued or applied for. 5. Repair and restore pool, pool deck and coping. (Building Department related). 6. Repair main security gate malfunction. (Building Department related) . 7. Rework/regrade swales. (Engineering Department related). Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 94-187 June 15, 1994 8. Reconstruct collars around catch basins. Department related). 9. Paint Miner Road wall. (Building Department related). Install landscaping and irrigation in accordance with approved plans. (City Forester and Planning and Zoning Department related). Response to this is same as #2 above. (Engineering 10. Discontinue use of sales office for off-project sales. (Building and Code Enforcement related). 11. Remove debris from lift station site. (Utilities Department related) . 12. Disconnect fence attached to Unit 123 (Building Department related) . 13. Patch pot holes. (Engineering Department related). 14. Completion of development in accordance with approved plans. (Building Department related). TJH/cmc xc: Mike Haag Kevin Hallahan II I CITRUS GLEN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICY/MAP { 1 T /Z ()s t:- L f )V {o ((_' /1 () I~ r=:- If FA! I T r / r=: v I I . V 'I V IV ~7 I V J----- P [ Ji)/ fu [ :r c '1//7 A-F I --" .,~. ,-- - "-~---~-'. . .~,-- dl..'velopments In the .H~a. If the parce'l is annexed. the adjacent right-of-way for Lawrence Road shoUld illso be annexed. 1 ~J rJ ~J ] ] J J ~] l 1 J 1 J J J l ~) c+TRus r^-(,c.AI Acrea~e (0 Northwest of Sunny South Estates Present Iy this area contains 6S acres of undeveloped property. and is shown on the Palm Beach County Land Use Plan to be in the 8 to 12 dwelling uni t pe'f 3cre land use category. These parcels should only be annexed if found to conform to statutory requirements and the City's annexation pOlicies. If annexed. these parcels should be placed in the "Low Density Resldentia'" land use category. so as to compatible with the densi ties of other development in the vicinity. Annexation of these parcels should also Include annexation of the adjacent'rlghts-of-way for Lawrence Road and Miner Road. Area 64 Sunny South Estates Sunny South Estates is an approved development whtch consists of a mobile home park on the eastern portion. smal I single-fami Iy homes on the northern portion. and apartments on the southwestern portion. It Is possible that the mobile home park portion may be redeveloped, to permanent housing. at which time. the City shOUld require a new water service agreement. and should require application for annexation. The City currently has a water service and annexation agre~ment covering the. southwestern portion of Sunny South Estates. It wo~ld be desirable to annex al I port Ions of Sunny South Estates. since this development has an extensive border wi th the City. and has an extensive border with other parcels which should possibly be annexed Into the City. The overal I density ot this development should not be permitted to exceed 6.5 dwelling unl ts per acre. Annexat Ion of the western port Ion of Sunny South Estate should also Include annexation of the adjacent rlght-ot-way tor Lawrence Road and N.~. 22nd Avenue. Area 65 Gustafson Property This Is a 20 acre parcel Which Is approved for 2-story townhouses with a maximum density ot 6 dwel ling units per acre. This property should be required to annex when J t becomes contiguous to the City. Because of the existing low-density neighborhood lying to the west. Increases to the approved density or building height are undesirable. ':f: :..~ . ";'"i ,. There Is an existing two acre parcel which Is zoned for :~~ ".~ ~(-r ,;~ >..1 ", ':.. ~ .~ 1 1 Area 66 Commercial Property Adjacent to Lawrence Road '-: ~' 141 , " ~1 . ==--- ~."~ € f 1'1 . ' . \ :r iJ . I ! j \ \\\.1. \ \ \ \ \ A-.. . -.- - - - -- ~' TO BE 'ADDED REGULATORY FRAMEWORK - AREAS \ (II] Areas of potent ial Land Use Co nWet [Lt}(c; 1 Areas of Existing Land Use Conflict _ Recommended Controls for Annexation Area ,.~ Recommended Limits of Annex.ation BOYNTON BEACH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ._a.O .....~ - ----. -- .------ - .. ;: . .. .. .. .. \ [ \ { { \ \ \ \ \ , EVALUATION & APPH^\S REPORT - 19B1; l'll[l'\.\REO BV: CITY OF II\'\'N1C'N (\1 p,( P;"ANN1NG Dfr^ll1 Ml N I '98(; 116-A ~- f ! PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-511 Agenda Memorandum for september 19, 1995 City Commission Meeting TO: carrie Parker city Manager FROM: Tambri J. Heyden T~" planning and zoning Director DATE: Septemtember 13, 1995 SUBJECT: Boynton Estates (fka citrus Glen Phase II and citrus park) NWSP 95-005 New Site Plan (signage) Please place the above-referenced request on the September 19, 1995 City commission agenda under Development Plans. DESCRIPTION: Ramiro Rencurrell, agent for Next Boynton Homes LTD, property owner, is requesting approval for entrance walls, signage, and accompanying landscaping for the Boynton Estates PUD. Boynton Estates is located on the east side of Lawrence Road, immediately north of Citrus Cove Elementary, and is currently under construction for development of 113 potential single-family homes. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board, with a 7-0 vote, recommended approval of this request, subj ect to staff comments (Building Division Memorandum No. 95-310 and planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-466). Please note that on June 6, 1995, the City Commission made a finding of no substantial change for a request to modify the Boynton Estates master plan. At this time the Commission also determined that a name other than Boynton Estates be used if the name of the PUD was going to be changed (last known as Citrus Park). This was discussed again by the Technical Review Committee during review of the site plan and no objections were raised regarding the name change. Therefore, the applicant continues to request the name Boynton Estates. , TJH:dim Attachment ., CCAl/nllO)' ,I!:Pt. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-493 SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION September 12, 1995 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Project Name: Boynton Estates aka Citrus Glen Ph II and fka Citrus Park Applicant: Next Boynton Homes LTD Agent: Ramiro Rencurrell Location: 8350 Lawrence Road (see Exhibit "A" - location map) File No.: NWSP 95-005 Land Use Plan Designation: Residential low density (LOR) Zoning Designation: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Type of Use: This application is limited to entrance walls, signage, and accompanying landscaping. Number of Units: Not applicable (development has 113 potential single-family homes) Square Footage: Site area: Tract ilL" of an 83'.81 acre project Building area: N/A Surroundinq Land Uses and Zoning District: North Citrus Trail, zoned PUD South Elementary school (Palm Beach County), zoned Single-Family Residential R-l-AA East Land located in Palm Beach County West Lawrence Road and farther west land being developed for single-family homes, zoned PUD Existing Site Characteristics: The eXisting project is currently under construction for development of single-family homes. Proposed Development: The subject site plan refers to two (2) entrance walls, signage and their immediate landscaping. The proposed walls and signage faces Lawrence Road and Citrus Park Boulevard. Concurrency: a. Traffic - The plat for the PUD addresses concurrency and is not applicable to this discussion. b. Drainage - The plat for the PUD addresses concurrency and it is not applicable to this disCll::ision. Page 2 site Plan Review staff Report Memorandum #95-493 Driveways: The driveway is not applicable to this request. However there is one two-way entrance into the project which is located near the south property line of the project at the west terminus of Citrus Park Boulevard (city right-of-way). Parking Facility: Parking facility is not applicable to this request. Landscaping: The landscaping of the entrance structures fully meets code requirements when staff comments are incorporated. Building and Site Regulations: Building and site regulations will fully meet code requirements when staff comments are incorporated. Community Design Plan: Colored elevations of the entrance structure reflect the harmonious theme of Boynton Estates. Signage: The two (2) entry wall signs submitted as part of this package are consistent with all code requirements when all staff comments are incorporated. Building Department Memorandum No. 95-310 states that the code will allow only one sign on each side of an entry. The sign code further specifies (Chapter 21 - Sign Code, Section 7. A.) that sign requirements for planned districts are to encourage continuity for signage while allowing for flexibility with respect to type, color, number and location (exclusive of setbacks) and design of signs. As previously stated there is one entrance to the project which is located near the south property line of the project at the west terminus of Citrus Park Boulevard. The total number of entry signs will be determined as a result of the approval of the request (see Exhibit "B " - sit e p I an) . REVIEW OF DEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS: Below is a list of those'departments that have comments regarding this request (see exhibit "C" - staff comments). DEPARTMENT ATTACHED MEMORANDUM Public Works Utilities Fire Police Engineering Division Building Division Parks & Recreation Forester/Environmentalist Planning and Zoning NA NA NA NA NA Memo #95-310 NA Na Memo #95-466 The above departments' comments may be addressed on the permit set of drawings. The remaining departments did not have comments regarding their review of the amended plans. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Department recommends approval of this site plan request, subject to the permit plans for the project being amended to show compliance with staff comments and the applicable City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. MEH:dim xc: central File " B~!SSt.A~.GWL E X H I BIT "A" . ' [OCATION MhP BOYNTON ESTATES I -.::HI" ' :", ~ rn'l/ -~ .~;; ~'~!l~~'" E~ tflf:tt t;.'~T:;' ~,J.~."", ~"li 10. W~ Pi_~r' I.--'-~~ _ . _____.~-- == , ',"?'..L / I III [!:::1- , 'r :'" --') I /), ~ = ,.'. 'I:::: \ /,~ a;"l~'~ ',".' - C!; ~II II' I' ( 1')" i: I ,~i. ,~ \ ~I r <, . ( . ~(, Ifr ~ 'PJJJ1 ("ill I EB-tj. :,./ '6t.sc:~ ~f~~ 111111 \ jiJ J I, lJf ~- -- - I -;)=r- , ~ JJI 1/ ~ ~I K~ Lt ::::: t ~ == ~ F It,\ 1 ~ :: g - . 1--, 'ii ~1~7: :q~~P1 ~ - -- :;-~LU,_ .' .~FA~A~ ,.~_,__ ~DITm . ~ _ _ ~. lJ ,fi~ = . = "SAUSALITO f--~ ((,:; lK~.l_ ;t-I -~ i1 I rl.!i:-.' __ ~ ~:: . G R 0 V E S " ~ ' -- )}-- - l 11.,1 n ~ ~ PUO I~~mtt/ eel I [_~-i'l IF;: ~i s = LU"5.~ I I 1 : .,'. l1 v13\~ \, f j !fJJI ~ .~ 1IIILJ ~ ~I ~_ ~L .. ~ Ll:.:._ -- ,1_I<'N'4 ,\l~H,"-:-l-- .-----, ~ .- _ _or C;1#~W~"i lJLlI'p'. &;: ~l~ --- Ej]L . : -- ~ .:-._(~~~,.; .~~~'--D\-lf---_rtl'~" r. I ,,~~ JU a '~-,-:~..-,J V -~ I: . "~~~~ -- ~ - - -- -, --' I " ,.' ~____WI, )'1> UiJ,~. ~11'1_~IIIII_II'llllll ) I ,--, . /~ ,1:/ ~ I .' -. ~ i ~~t~s~-~ il .F, c...r-Sj f ;'l~l [} ~) J I, ~-- i.. r -< ,I r- ~!. ~FC-=--;--:'=7--~t::j~. -. ~ '-', - ~ [ - :~ L_ ..~ ....:. .~1~U-' llll1JillLLLill - ~ ::ll~ ~--- ~eJ2?-____.... __... .t ~~ C::- I .,,.J' I ,I - - - ill ' ' ,- rnmrn rrrrn, ] I I -.. ~:~'l ~~~...~= --.-. ' " . HIIIrTIoonltG"; lUilli . '/ ='" =~ " EHDTItlJJJllU;ftm~Hlrnl, . l ::15..!11111i " .. .~_ .. . .. nT1TIllflTllun1mnrrr I \ I ! :11 8c.'>!JT,/"'oAJ CA/VAL C-'Co '0 1/8 MILES J L ,_.-,l ~~Ji ,\. j I ~,I 1 __-' :ltl 1$ I -' 1(" I J -- I J I' 'l ' ! \ F=' -H" I! I I ~ilrr I' I I . . '1111 I' no l.lii'teiTl'''' I ~. ~i__~ t:-t ,;, I! '_i I. : t rL..,iU! I ~,LrJ -n ~:Ul-r j"1'U' I' r 1,'~ ... ;,.~ .J1'~' ,oof~ . 7 ; _~,! - t-..-JUI! ,!- ;: J ._, ./ '0 400.800 FEET III '\' -I ~ ~'-"i---- "4/' J ......../, .' ) I /'II . 1-" a, - - J - -- - . , .L-"r 1 ' ~ -, I I I I, . I - { . c" - ",' < ., .!' " -- I I I ' I / 1\.'1 r./,' _. - ,"'t!> ( 1 ~ I r It' j I t'=- - ~ ~'o ~ c,A~A L ~~:~ 'y_l5ittO = t ,1~~-r.rrT:> 'I' r-'" ._~- { . .....LLL....~J_l.d 1 ~~ LL....._ \ I- ~,;- - - ':" T - 1~~&i1~~t ll~~~~f - AG ..,..-.- J=<. ~ ~ -;\j :::: -: ... ~ f?! "BOYNTON . ~ =i..~ ~~HC~ NURSERIES" I~' ~-,.",1,....~.: ~ ," -I.': ~ -fi _ I- -(~, :":~f I : :,.', ~ c :~\ : j i Tf 1 puo ~ ~~ LUI:4.0 ~~ ~ SITE R1AA ~~~Il",~_ E X H I BIT "B" , ' SICNAC I'lTIJST: Iabftflt.lI~ftlBlIIOIJ "_lilt Desn{btlen. OUDI\ Kn S'"INI_...m.. 16'.11' hll, _ble Itl, SR' Que. Plaa Liropc -..cIIl"oricllll' '-pl.rull 60 LV Au<< Grou C'e........... Of ~obeWlIl 100JI" ]'.2' 4- CY 1,;.. s... SalMI' .....ah .. ,,",' 50' AN """';'10 pi...... wI\h iiI'" ~ ""Ih. P,..liftl ...., S '" t:- I (;. I --- _/' /...../ , / // IJJ -6 SIGNAGE PLAN11NOft.AN DETAIL MOTE. SlGNAOE PlANllNG PLAN 0ElM. TO OYEAAlDE APPROIIEO LANDSCAPE PUN ~ S ~ ~ ~ ~ ; 0 ~ ~ ~ II: ~ f .. ~ I' . ~ ~ ~ I j ~ ! i IINTIC.Y ",u.TIIAe. I)" TI ......... IQA&.I ... tHOPtI ClU.WN ..at IHET ! 1 I OFI IHImI 1 I 19 ~ D ,.{ ~ fL /' '~..... $ ...J \ ~ ~ ~ l<j 7 6 . " ~t;.""I""'l''''~IUf''lJl- "",&> "~ .... - , ..... ~ ~---@ LOCATION PLAN avt~ / / '".C;O' ENTRY FEATURE/PERIMETER WALL ... E- ~ ;z: OJ ~ ~ ~ a.. ffJ 9 OJ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ E z E X H I BIT "e" , , BUILDING DIVISION August 18, 1995 I~rn~ & rn 0 'If} rn mIl Uu AlII; 2 I /9fli /.!!J J PLANNING AND ZONING OFPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 95-310 To: Tambri, Planning & Zoning Director From: Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Boynton Bstates (aka Citrus Glen Phase II fka Citrus Park New Site Plan - Sign Program (Bntry Signage Only) 8350 Lawrence Road Re: The color rendering does not correspond with the detail drawings: 1. There is no planter box shown on the drawings, therefore, I would assume that the renderings would be modified 'to match the drawings and measurements including the planter boxes would be a maximum of 6 Ft. 2. Code would only permit one wall sign on each side of the entry-way. The entry to this property on Lawrence Road would be shared by the school and Boynton Estates, therefore, only one sign is allowed. The appropriate location should be more or less at the center of Lot 11. 3. If the colors are to be as shown on rendering, please identify the colors by name and number. AN:mh ~/ I rz /' ~ ,~.~ 71z1/G}~~// Al Neildi--- Att: Plans cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Department of Development Director A:SBSTATBS,TRC PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-466 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Michael E. Haag Site and Zoning Development Administrator DATE: September 8, 1995 SUBJECT: site Plan Review - 2nd Review - New Site Plan Project: Boynton Estates (aka Citrus Glen Phase II fka Citrus Park) Location: 8350 Lawrence Road Agent: Next Boynton Homes Ltd File No.: NWSP 95-005 The following is a list of comments regarding the second review of the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list of comments that identify unresolved comments either from the first review or new comments as a result of the second review. To show compliance with these comments will not substantially alter the configuration of the site and design of the building. The second category is a list of recommendations I believe will enhance the aesthetics and function of the project. All comments and recommendations can be rectified on the plans at time of permitting it the site plan request is approved. The applicant must understand that additional comments may be generated upon review of the documents and working drawings submitted to the building Department for permits for the proposed project. I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: 1. Identify on the plans of the entry wall, the color of the pre-fab coping, bracket and circular sphere. 2. Add a note to the landscape plan that indicates the landscape material shown and approved with the master plan will remain as originally approved. 3. Add to the landscape plan a note that specifies the grade of the landscape material is Florida #1 or better as given in "Grades and Standards for Nursery Plants" State of Florida Department of Agriculture. Also specify that the material will be installed in a sound workmanlike manner and according to accepted planting procedures. 4. Specify on the landscape plan a note that indicates the landscaped areas shall be irrigated with an automatic irrigation water supply system. (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.B.) 5. Dimension on the drawing the line of sight triangle at the intersection of Citrus Park Boulevard and Lawrence Road. Also, specify the size of the unobstructed clear cross visibility space required within the triangular area. 6. Define clearly on the drawing, the extent of the work proposed with this site plan; e . g. the wall, the landscaping for the wall, etc. Indicate on the plan, in note form, that all other improvements shown are not part of this request. Page 2 Memorandum No. 95-466 2nd Review, New Site Plan Boynton Estates File No.: NWSP 95-005 7. Add to the landscaping/site plan all existing and proposed easements and overhead power lines. Some landscape materials are not allowed to be installed below power lines or within easements. II RECOMMENDATIONS 8. specify melaleuca mulch will be us.z.:i in the planting beds. 9. Considering the proposed wall/signs are located part on the residential lots and part in Tract "L" establish and record a wall/sign easement around the subj ect structures. The wall/sign easement shall be dedicated to the home owner association and made large enough to allow maintenance of the structure. NOTE: If recommendations are approved, they shall incorporated into the working drawings required permits for the project. be for MEH:dim xc: central File a:Boe.2nd.gwl VIII. DEVELOPMENT PLANS B cc: Plan, Dev PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTM MEMORANDUM NO. 95-247 Agenda Memorandum for June 6, 1995 city Commission Meeting TO: carrie Parker City Manager FROM: -----;1 . /( - Tambri J. Heyden ,-) Planning and Zoning Department DATE: May 31, 1:::'95 SUBJECT: Citrus Park PUD - MPMD #95-002 Revised screen enclosure setbacks and establish pool setbacks NATURE OF REOUEST Louis R. Campanile of CCL consultants, INC., agent for Next Development ~mpany, property owner, is requesting to modify the citrus parkfLlrnaster plan as follows (see Exhibit "A" - letter of request and proposed master plan) : 1. Reduce the approved rear screen pool enclosure setback from 8 feet to 6 feet. 3 . Reduce the approved side screen pool enclosure setback from 15 feet to 10 feet. (-JI7~e!.A.~"""v)_ Establish the following pool setbacks: A)~ .lA-....e...-u. .'-~ f} ~~~~ Front 22 feet ~ I--'t,r . 2. Side (Interior) 12 feet Side (Zero lot line)- 2 feet Side (Corner) 18 feet Rear 8 feet k~f~( ~ Residence be~-e..J..~ Residence , It (With shear wall) 5 feet 3 feet Note: The following original screen enclosure setbacks will remain the same; 20 feet front, 0 feet side (zero lot line) and 20 feet (corner). The 28.34 acre, 113 lot, single-family detached, zero lot line, development is zoned PUD and located on the east side of Lawrence Road approximately 1,750 feet north of Gateway Boulevard (see Exhibi t liB" - location map). BACKGROUND In August 1989, the zoning and accompanying master plan was approved for the subject property under the name Citrus Park PUD. The property owner, in November of 1994, requested and received administrative approval to omit from the master plan, the non- required recreation facility (see Exhibit "C" - current Master Plan). The applicant, Next Development Company, paid all required fees and received plat approval on March 7, 1995. On March 28, 1995, a land development order was issued to begin construction of the project, now referred to as "Boynton Estates". '\ .., ,..., .. Page 2. Agenda Memorandum for city Commission Meeting June 6, 1995 Citrus Park PUD - MPMD# 95-002 The typical lot size is 55 feet by 100 feet. All lots front on an internal private road network with one ingress/egress to Lawrence Road. The project is bordered by the Citrus Glen PUD to the north, Citrus Cove Elementary School to the south, residential land to the east in Palm Beach County, Lawrence Road to the west and farther west, Nautica, formerly known as the Boynton Nurseries PUD. The approved building setbacks of 20 feet front, 0 feet side, 15 feet interior side, 20 feet corner side and 15 feet rear setback are not affected by this request. The approved screen enclosure setbacks are as follows: 20 feet front, 8 feet rear, 15 feet side (interior), 0 feet side (zero lot line) and 20 feet (corner). Pool setbacks were not established with the original master plan. Chapter 2.5, Planned unit Development, of development regulations states that changes developments shall be processed as follows: the in city's planned land unit Section 12. Changes in plans. "Changes in plans approved as a part of the zoning to PUD may be permitted by the planning and zoning board upon application filed by the developer or his successors in interest, prior to the expiration of the pud classification, but only [after] a finding that any such change or changes are in accord with all regulations in effect when the change or changes are requested and the intent and purpose of the comprehensive plan in effect at the time of the proposed change. Substantial changes shall be proposed as for a new application of PUD zoning. The determination of what constitutes a substantial change shall be within the sole discretion of the city commission. Nonsubstantial changes as determined by the city commission in plans shall not extend the expiration of the eighteen month approval for the PUD classification." ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed this request for consistency with the PUD development standards, and the intent and purpose of planned unit developments as stated in the following sections of Chapter 2.5 of the city's land development regulations: Section 1. Intent and purpose. "A Planned Unit Development District (PUD) is established. It is intended that this district be utilized to promote efficient and economical land use, improved amenities, appropriate and harmonious variety in physical development, creative design, improved living environment, orderly and economical development in the City, and the protection of adj acent and existing and future City development. The district is suitable for development, redevelopment and conservation of land, water and other resources of the City. Regulations for planned unit developments are intended to accomplish the purposes of zoning, subdivision regulations and other applicable City regulations to the same degree that they are intended to control development on a lot-by-Iot basis. In view of the substantial public advantages of planned unit development, it is the intent of PUD regulations to promote and encourage development in this form where tracts suitable in size, location and character for the uses and structures proposed are to be planned and developed as unified and coordinated units. Page 3. Agenda Memorandum for city Commission Meeting June 6, 1995 Citrus Park PUD - MPMD# 95-002 Section 9. Internal PUD standards. B. INTERNAL LOTS AND FRONTAGE. within the boundaries of the PUD, no minimum lot size or minimum yards shall be required; provided, however, that PUD frontage on dedicated public roads shall observe front yard requirements in accordance with the zoning district the PUD use most closely resembles and that peripheral yards abutting other zoning districts shall be the same as required in the abutting zone." with respect to the changes requested, the original building and screen enclosure setbacks were established consistent with other zero lot line developments in the City. One of the concepts of zero lot development is to create more side yard space, on the property, between units. This is accomplished by allowing the exterior wall of a unit to set on the property line of an abutting lot, with the opposite side of the unit being no closer than 1S feet to the abutting property line. Thus, creating a 15 foot side yard setback. The minimum side yard setback allowed in conventional single-family zoning districts is 7.5 feet (each side) to the abutting property line. l?A4..../l~e request to reduce the side yard setback for screen roof f'UYr-- ~~closures from 15 feet to 10 feet;;i;:er- cannot be supported by staff (see attached Fire Department Memorandum No. 95-268). The proposed request is contrary to a concept of zero lot line development that al though side yard space is aggregated, sufficient open space between buildings is still provided. staff recommends that the non-zero line side yard setback of 15 feet be maintained for s_tructures and scre,en ~oo~ enclosur-es;,'r ~- r- ~~~is'f1~44J!!t -to ~ Pi o-c.. Lk.p.:-t _ Is n'J?"'",ClG~,1k. ""~ -ti'~ ~;tL..:.;.. -II4.k,,".(.-.. ~ N-a~~ h 1'5 ~L--,... ~L~' Relative to the request to reduce the rear setback for screen roof ~ enclosures from 8 feet to 6 feet, it is recommended that th~ 10 kL. reduced setback be ab~ with two exceptions. where the rear ~~~ property line of a lot abuts any portion of any other residential ~~~ lot in the development, or where the rear lot line abuts a C ;s residential lot within an adjacent development, the rear setback shall continue to be 8 feet. 3", ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ sfil( lre.c., Regarding the establishment of the above ground .p<?ol setbacks, staff finds these accePtable~~i,~l1 {~ne..>>.FePtion~the interior side setl?p'-Sk sWl J;!eL).".;; .~~Eit(o.anC1"1!ne llllac,""ni'er side setback shall be 20 feet~~-Bas~~o~Ir[s recommendation is that pool setbacks in conventional zoning districts (non-PUD) are allowed no less than 8 feet on each side and 8 feet in the rear. RECOMMENDATION .'''-.... On Tues to review recommends substantial May 23, 1995, the Technical Review Committee (TRC) met 's master plan modif ication request. The ~6ard-rte--C. that he City Commission make a finding of no change ~_" the proposed modification, '~nd that the e, subj ect to the ~ staff exception i e a~the attached staff comments in composite Exhibit "DI~~l. S De~ent Memorandum No. 95-177, Fire Department Memorandum 95-268 WD~ Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum 95-246, Building Divi~~~~~and~~ No. 95- ~--an.r,! Engineering Division Memorandum No. 95-1~_ ._._~-- '---......"-.......,--, ''i:Je,0247 or.. l~' ~ ' " ',' , , ...,.... ill A ~ ' . /J ~ OW>- ~~;I:f!d ~ :;;;::~ df- ~~ ~t:::;~ ~,,' t~ Il ~-h/, ~ ~. f?ul 15- ~ jf - //. ---;1; //,<2 ?G. ~ ~ '~~~''-l 'W ..., $' CCl CONSULTANTS, INC. 2200 PARK CENTRAL BLVD., N, SUITE 100, POMPANO BEACH, FL 33064, (305) 974-2200 · FAX (305) 973-2686 May 9, 1995 Hand Delivery Ms. Tambri Heyden, Director CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 RE: CITRUS PARK PUD Boynton Beach, Florida CCL project No. 3454 Dear Ms. Heyden: As agent for the owner, Next Boynton Homes, Ltd., we are herein submitting for a modification to the existing approved Master Plan on the referenced project and are enclosing the following: 1. Twelve (12) prints of Master Plan Modification drawing; 2. Check in the amount of $500.00 for the City'S review fee. This modification will serve two purposes: (1) to slightly modify the existing approved screen enclosure setbacks and (2) to establish swimming pool setbacks. We would greatly appreciate it if you could process this modification through all applicable City review processes. Should you have any questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, CCL CONSOLTANTS, INC. ~ Jr., P.E., P.L.S. LRC{kag Enclosures cc: Ramiro Rencurrell, Next Boynton Homes, Ltd. E X H I BIT "A11 'W ..." '.oUc;l.tt.,):.J::l .j!,t,I AJ "'~"JU "11'd .l.S~ 00""-..0 ;; O....,MOot ~ ,.., ...~~=::~::~= ....., :liT" ....... ,.a. ....... ... ....... 1tA_&, 4_1 .., "......... ........ ...WWMD_._ '... ~....=-.., ~~I ..-.. ......~.. - ON! Sl NV I1nSNOO 1 :) :) -'" --.. .. - \. ~ e IIIW \ I , VUl'I01. 'tIDYII MO&M.O' "_'_IIO&M.O' " .. ;':. . I !I Hi!i II \ .,: I!l't-I =1 '. J h~.;i r-':"1 : ~~1l -". " , . L . '.: ,~ .J t, .. \ '-,i.ltlll"'; ..-' II iO. ... · If' 4 " 1_ _1- , J ~ J r--;-l '\ I \ \: \ I I I NOI1VOIJIQOV. NV1d ij31Sltrt and )IYVd snYJ,l:> E . I . I" I :',~,' j ;.:~: :::: I I ~l'" .... Ii'" II ; ~ .' 1III I t Uti 'I ~ · I.... .... I I I .... I I 1 ' !'It..' ~'":.''' I. t .~t;. II ., ,..~ ." ....... f ~.... .. 1 1 I" t"\ m I ~ill; It I It uu I 'I I . liii I , I I',' III I !, I' '!:' II. I I)- 'I I I ,I I -II 'I 'I"" 'I'" I I tll,III",II,I'I,I, ,I., IHI.I,I,'I ,pl\; qd, I II .n d lUll .." 10 nB I. laal I \ t & ~ q ,I. i I: I :~ !I. Iii . t , " ilil". it ( ~,~ ~;. I~ .11.t -rG-'=1 i~i~lii !t .1. 1!1!1-, I; i~. ' ~':I;I~ iil :!~t . ~ICiill'II.' ~1'li I :- f .' 1:1 II ~ a M. I' I, i.-! i hh. _, '~I.~II = 1ill",1I ~ u, .i:i.il ~ !i. !i.! I mii I IU~_ I n, 11s!!1 ! !!!!!! , .-! , ,iU, , liiii. ~ o .. ! .. ',,- -0 z~ 00 , .. e. =;c ..,". fi e, .... ~ ! t:I .. " ! ~ ~ dl ~ ..- - ,- t ~ ~~. r~~~'''': 3f.- ~ .~ ~ y.., .- i!<'I~~~ ~ r:o ?'_--'1l1 ~. ~ \1 --,-- -- . - \ 7'- I - _H,7,;.J.... .. b Q,. , ~ . z mun 0( 1.'-'-. ... Go I I ffi \ I l- I I I (I) I 11111 ! 4 :IE Q 'hum , w i > 0 i I a: I!!!!!! I Do , a. 0( , , CJ ~ z I ,I , - t- en I bill - >< w , Imll ~ I I I . ~ I /-- E X H I BIT liB 11 LeCATION W.AP CITRUS PARK PUD I-~ I~TXf!li' J~ t:: t../'. ......... .-.-..... I~ ~~.l'-~ ,..;-', I "- - IKNCLLWDDC ~~ 71 ~~~ , n i~ AG GROll. 7/fl" ~::::!-: ~;e-~[; ~H3' ~ ._:~i~ e- " ~ n&~)1 --v I- -1_ r-) ~ ' E: t .'Y~ , __ ~~tfIllllll'II1.U1ITUlT , --' '1 rt-rrf(, I III ~:.-.---~. ~<JT Ic.~ ~I~':" · ~I!" L 1I11"~. ' ~tfjtfjr7EJ'tftju I ~ -l ~ [1 ~~w"'" Co.". - ~ .l~ =mm~ E1,t -f ,--". --1--1 .~~ ~I I 1~"11 I I I'd ~ " J ''-') , ~ f.1 H ::;::. " .~ . . . ~~,.;L f(- ~ - ;,:~" .".. '!:: \.w-Yj rlIH~ : Dq~ __ '~)IJI[i~!,j ,:). ~'\'. I I ~ Ir--'I \1>>-::;:, ,-J ", " ~" ~ ~'fJi:. r; J s ~~~~ I .~d \ T '\ ~\U~~~_~~5 ~0} '(, L- ~ ~); EffiID~ ij ~E ) .7 ~ T\,-r: I~_;/ "l ~~~ ~ 1 i~' I I I I I 11-1 \ v7l" -.- ---11 ! -=-11 . VW'.o.t? t::-~""AL ~'.#D ....., '-'~ .,':"1Z..J IW'\..J , Pl t LU I. ..1 ~ '- ~ "MS. . 1ft. ~ ~ .- - - - - - - -- .. ,ID~ Ir~,_ ,nf- II I ~~ 'J' ' - '" 'TTf""' , I .. 1 j: ......-U.L!..J..l.... 'llJn~rr III' ,,' I"J !! I j 1.1 . J.J....L I AG --1:''::'''':''') -. , -_. ~---- ----- , . ;- I , -. ~ ::= = . = ; m-. : '~ . . , I , . 0 .fl ~' l l ;:;= r i-\ l ' '.. ~ ~::..~ .... fI-.' , , , . .. j CJ ~~~- II IJ ..- t I .... '.~ ULjIJ :; J r~ - 1; :~"c:~:~ ~.~ i" ~lI~ ---- ~ ._-- ;--:... ,,~..~ L -~r,r~ II I ., w t:1 K 1\1 urTIII:U rill' t m: ~ I' ffiffill~ ~ llirn': . ~ ~ = : ~ ~~lY'l/i'TlIII'ITmi rrm - -J t I-I L ~. .. _ _~ ___ _ _ _.', _~'2. ~ I I 11_ ... , - - Jil~Ll.,~ _ I" _: I I I - Ilrnn~ \ i I \ \ \ \ \] n I T\ T 1 1 I '1'1 _.L.:..~--LJ tt::t:LU= I ~~~~ i. \ J lU ~~-!:~ ITIJII]j ~ I ~ ~1 Tfl' '0 1/8 MILE'SV" " HmIB ~ - 1= - H ~ r-l I_ill I I ~ tI:1IJ]j .... II T : +:l ~.. I +1.:1 . .1111 I . _ _ .. ~mmI)JDA~iLBh,Jl]Jr~"~,~=~~~ '0 400. '800 FEET ~ -,---- ---j=i~\T~----li=-rrl~,iofi<',- -1~8I WII..-- ---- PI..A /\INI'" /: Ot;.D 1". b - 95, I ( Fof' bL; ~~:.-_. .-.,r I .,J~ ~-, +=~. R& c I j 11 , ~ I I f)". ' . '. , I ~ll I , 1.....,,..- I I ;J ~u=~~ ,,~ i . I I' I I-~ ~ ':. I . L I r r :-:-:.-::_-_:.:.:_:~- ~---- I '--,-~ 'I ~ -- II Iii I . I I - l l 1- ~ E X H I BIT "en I[H'H )" ~~ g ;. IH1ilI L S I ltJ ,~ ~ fHHii I~ I i a~~ ~ - .II"H ......U.. . I /;':> \~~\ _~J ~] _;J,~] ';-i ';~l ,/\ ;;1 c il ~-- JII,..--l -- __J <'__ i I i I; " ...--7 :. 1 \ ~ Ii ~d i~i 2 >n.._. iP:-: ~:~) ~I-l ~ r--:--1 " il. Ii t :I~' - I ["--;-j "./ :!.. I ,=, f--,:-t' -'-::_~ ;.:1 ;11 -~ _:~ I . !' ~__-J ~__.J _J ! .: r. I ;; Iii -= .. E"; ["---;'-1 I I I _ ! I ! !.Iil"inil I - I f--00--1 ',--_______ ,"" :-i--1 ,..____, I, l;! h !I~IIW f--i-: ~-~.-::\ -, III r----., ~_U ';.II!. II I' ,_: ! : I Cll>. I I :: ,..----, I I I :. ,..----., -'_ --L. I I I .l._~ I - I .. . _, :: .!' .., ,. 'I I ,..____., I" I . 'a -I.' .., r----." \ o. I !! 1:lII i.. -L..-~ I., I I --:;- J."I : :: r----.., ... - -- -, .. ! · I I I .1 S/: a I .. I . -.. : :: ~ --';:':'t~~-t : J' Jl i r----' e I .. I !i ~ · .-----, ~ = : : f tl : ,f.. U I : : : :: i:il ~=! J. ; :.1 ~ ~~' :' :il;~I~~~~~~' ~~: :- =; _ I . I I _ oJ ~":I I.. I -m1i1j i---i'1 5 ~'-.;=~,; ~~~J 11f -', r-:--l s ;!i ii. r--~;-l .. 0..:..!~T 1'1 ~ ~' I - ! :ej :.' =: ., ~----" ' r----' ;J. .. I _',! ~I' I : I l~i:~:I' f--~'j '-~A I! !I: .II~.: .! -~::';"':jJ!'~ i -~-fJ~l'" ~,AI :--;--1 ~!i.3;. f--~-l ~_!, --I. -H ~!~ !.. ! .=.'1-." I. r-----,' .. : I I I :11 ""'2=''''- f. 101 Oll::.!:d I. I ,--- _ -., t! I .. I I .. I '" .. II ! ... I ~. ~~~h' --~ :;f'~~;-~ ~;":. I ::!!I ~ - .. I :' "1~ I .' '~. t 2 Sf ,I .--:'-j" !: ..: =H: !1: t: Ii SSI - i. _: · '.h __oJ ooJ =-"_J --:1 ': ! ~ 11:1 'uw.nllAI ;:.-, J ~ i. ::1 \ ~- ~~~ :--:-1 I _::,-u. -'" '---J- '-: :: J -1-~ I ' - -- - - -... I ( . L__uJ ~1' ,----., :: ~ \ c:i f: ; : I ,~/I ~ : :y....: ' ...........__:~.J ...----, I = I,' I ~ : ; I :! I " . -, ~ \, .. L____.J :' '\ ) i . 0 I ... I --, 00, --j , , \1 t: 1 · I I ..I ,,' ' ~J U L____.J : I : I .. ~ I'.-..::::=--::r.__ , 'I ...__________....1 : ::: __J __J __J I \ ~ " I L ____oJ ~' J. " '~ "'\ L__:.J r-utl' U1 ~--l i-l~ /r----..q.~ - ..( L:J ~-~--; :-1~.J rJ Jr-;-~ ,.~" I : I I.! ./ ....____, ~.._.., l,.tA4 .____J r.~ \\ -. \ r::J- \~ (' -:::----)' ,\ ....--....1 " ............ . /~ \. \ --;\ ; //' ! '1\ +::;f i " ...1' /, , I: : · 1 i (I : ; ... "" i I, : r ----~! i ',~ _ )/ G I .. : I ~ ...'H "'--"::-::::'-=..." ~!I ~ r-:--1 1 I ~.. _.. I ~ I __ r i ,: C r----' ----- :t.::. I I. I - -:1 I --1 L~_~) . .. _:J I -:} -=1 \:01 t - ------__X I " I *~ -""'I"""""""'1111I111I11I1I11111I11I111111t1l11111111111111111111111"111111111 . . 1I111111t11111....III1..IIII1t1ll1ltlltlllllllll . 111"" I 111111111 i '"'''"''' 00'"'' ","""""'" "'"'''"'''''''''''''' ~,"NlIllMnr'..'"" ..l...l.... -... wallla,~ 'H:lW.1 1I0Ul_0. '11".._ 110.&11.101 YGlIlO'.. 'M:)YI8 NO......\OI _ ,... )l!:lYd SnYll:):~O.'Yo,IW i "" <: 91 ,..----, ti ~ . :.n~__; f d' ~,~--: y> J , · , 5. Jl ! .. ! 1t.lL r----., , ~~ I = J .,~., ~~ ...L::-..--L i j"----, I _ I ! ... . ~7~ r::;- ~t I ... I . I .. I ii f: :1 j! ! !i i ~= I ;1 I W. I" ~ ::! I .- a . u. ! .--...... ~ : : i ~L.____..\ . \ \ .. ,) \ --- ...' ") : / , - I '-J --, . \ ") .., ~, "'... ,. , I ......._ __J I K=7 '~ , I --......../....1' <~B /~ ',> --, i~. .., " t, , . : ',...,,' ~ , ! : --~ ---i --, : I ::: _.1 __J --., , .1 .. I I __.J ~ ! t & '" . . "- 'I ~ : 1= 00 Ii ! 'W :oJO~ 7i:Y. . '" ~11'~- 11'-:'-'-" '~'ma ill.' ~~i !,.~~ ~. i ~>..' .,'. I ., CIIt II ~ ''{~ -""~" .' It' ... I!! c .. III III ~ o III i :::;: ==: :~:= ....., ..... .Ihi~ I I 1-.' II : 1111'....11 Inn ....Iu iii1i I ::m m~~,. I (I .~.. I' 1.1 iii~ If'I!I,lliI J !I It 1m I~ 1llll!lldiiil !III~ im II i Idihln;lllll~ II dill! i : J II lill~:, I II!I 1,1 I II I" 51 ..1, i Iii" IIIIIs ni~ .J ~ ~~~ N~ ~~ ' S!I EiiEi I In;. I Iii I I:i!! III ,'. i I~ Ii, II. -il i.. I'; i il Ii Iii i .1 Ii Ii. 1'& . . lil " III 1!1!lll ~II' I!I~I;I 1= I;. I , ' !" 1<<11 I,. .-1 Ii '. i- , !I!hl' .ai ~'Ii g 1'lIi-li II i.1 'I!i · il= il= .1; !.-51 I ~ I~I I . - '1'1111 I-I c..J, ..... i I i~i :'i: '! IIliirlh . ,U Ili.,-I,' i !II -=1 , i .i.I.! g !II !WI; I I i:::i= I, I~~:;i -I." g 1:1!i-i I nn I lii._. .......:.. . . I l ~ ;, : e n en '. ~ t ~ \I iii: It & :. Ii .ci =' .c t;j Cl ~~ ~ ~ I I . I I III E X H I BIT liD" W' ,.., MEMORANDUM Utilities # 95-177 TO: Tambri 1. Heyden, Planning & Zorn Dir Date: May 30, 1995 FROM: John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities SUBJECT: Citrus Park, Master Plan Modification First Review Staffhas reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: 1. Lot set backs should be consistent throughout the project. In no case should the set backs be less than, Citrus Glen, the project adjacent to the north. 2. Unobstructed access shall be maintained for utility and drainage easements, (Sec.26.33(a)). It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. sm xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella File id.JL r~ I;~ II " ,I . ;,!i , !; f ~ , " \!;' 1:-: , ; r, ; . i:\:' fb FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-268 WDC TO: Planning Department FROM: Fire Department DATE: May 26, 1995 RE: Master Plan Change Boynton Estates (AKA-Citrus Park) Lawrence Rd The Fire Chief has determined that fifteen feet (15') between buildings shall be maintained for Fire Department access. 1 ( 7 . t;// c,~~d-t?1 6 / avanaugh, FP i "".~"''''-''''''''''''''' -'~-....-.,____ "I ) ~ (ii) rt' -,'~' -.---,-.--- 1111 Ir; (LJ ,~ n Piq R r-'), 'j 11'/'1---' _.:-dL.!:i..ll/l!! ,i' I . 6 " I II ! ; . - 1 ri.iij"(il;\1~1~"'- f .,/':i:j;i.il):'~_:r.' $! ,., ....., BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-159 ill MAY 3 0 Il~::b May 30, 1995 PlANNING AND ZONING DEPT. TO: Michael E. Haag, Site & zoning Administrator FROM: Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Master Plan Modification for Citrus Park P.U.D. RE: After reviewing the submitted revised master plan, the Building Division offers the following comments: 1. That this change is only for the 7 typical models as shown and any lot that has a model constructed and can't comply with these setbacks cannot be permitted without requiring a change in site plan. 2. The setbacks shown are for in-ground pools only. Above ground pools must comply with the same setbacks as the buildings. 7.-, ~ #/ *~2 ~-// Al Newbold AN:ck cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Department of Development Director C:C1TRUSPK.TRC PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-246 FROM: Carrie Parker city Manager . --,.:: ,J Tambrl J. Heyden J~H Planning and Zoning Director TO: DATE: May 31, 1995 SUBJECT: CITRUS PARK PUD - MPMD #9~-002 (Revised Screen Enclosure Setbacks and Establish Pool setbacks - Staff Comments) Please be advised of the following Planning and Zoning Department comments with respect to the above-referenced request: 1. On the drawing titled Master Plan, omit the typical 55 foot by 100 foot patio home lot drawing and replace it with three drawings showing the same typical lot size (drawn to a smaller scale) . One drawing shall illustrate minimum building setbacks (hard roof), one shall illustrate minimum screen roof enclosure setbacks and the third shall illustrate minimum pool setbacks. On each of the three drawings, dimension the size of the lot and identify the size as typical. Within each drawing delineate the maximum buildable area for structures/buildings, screen roof enclosures and pools. This delineation shall identify the approved minimum dimension each structure and/or pool may be located from abutting prop~rty lines. Using a distinguishable symbol, shade in and label the maximum buildable area (It is not necessary to identify the area or dimensions of the area, just to shade and label the area.) In addition, provide the above three drawings for an irregular shaped lot, such as Lot 66. Show, label and dimension the minimum setbacks and delineate the maximum buildable area for structures/buildings (hard roof), screen roof enclosures and pools, in the same manner as for the typical lot. Below each of the three drawings place the approved setback chart. On each of the six drawings, show dimension and label the typical utility and drainage easements, including the 3 foot maintenance/drainage easement adjacent to the zero lot line. Place the following two (2) general notes below the six drawings: i. No buildings or any kind of construction shall be placed on utility or drainage easements. ii. Maximum lot coverage is 45%. 2. Add a note to the pool setback drawing to state that the setbacks are for below-ground pools and that above-ground pools, such as whirlpools and jacuzzies, shall comply with the building setbacks. 3. Omit sheet 2 of 2 or complete this drawing by depicting on it the approved building, screen roof enclosure and pool setbacks for each lot. 4. A revised master plan, which reflects all staff comments and conditions approved by the city Commission and Planning and Development Board, shall be submitted in triplicate to the Planning and Zoning Department, prior to permits being issued for those screen enclosures or pools that are part of this request. s~~el!:.o245. arw 'W' ,.., I' BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-151 May 24, 1995 From: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director W~m V. Hukill, P.B. ~tment of Development Director Citrus Park Master Plan Modification To: Re: We have reviewed the suggested setback reductions for swimming pools and/or screen enclosures at Citrus Park and find them wanting. If, for example, the rear screen enclosure setbacks are reduced to six feet, it is possible to back up two houses (one 'from Citrus Park and one from Citrus Glen) and end up with twelve feet between enclosures. It is even worse when you consider that both owners are entitled to fences and/or planting and, if constructed, no access would be available to those rear yards. If you combine the six foot rear yard setback with two requested side yard setbacks of two feet each, you have no access there, either. The applicant has stated that he would not create adjacent two foot situations, but when he is gone, an independent owner may apply for a permit for his lot which is between two lots with two foot setbacks already in place, and be unable to build at all. At some point, we probably should refer to units essentially without yards as multi-family homes, or perhaps even as row houses, but not single family detached homes. Please also remind the applicant that Land Development Regulations, Chapter 5, Article V, Section 1, D 10, Page 5-7 declares that "no buildings or structures shall be placed within easements." WVH : mh cc: Carrie Parker, City Manager Michael Haag, Planning & Zoning A:CITRUSPK " MEMORANDUM 29 October 1987 TO: Peter L. Cheney, City Manager FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato, Planning Director RE: Comprehensive Plan Amendments/State Review The State Department of Community Affairs (DCA) has completed its review of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments for Citrus Glen and Lawrence Grove which were forwarded to DCA in August of this year. For your information, attached please find a copy of DCA's response. By copy of this memo, I am requesting the City Attorney and City Clerk to commence ordinance adoption procedures. Ordinances for annexation, Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning will be required. ' C~.~ CARMEN S. ANNU IATO /bks cc: City Attorney City Clerk Mr. Alan Miller R,' ~ ,.........-..,..""..- .... , '.,,, :. l-.".D.... , . ,,;;.,. "/:;h. : ~:~"""'...:.>. ,; , , .' ~ ~ JCT IP87 F' !_J"~., ~ .; -,' I: STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 2 5 7 1 E X E CUT I V E C E N T ERe IRe L E, E A ST. TAL L A HAS SEE, F LOR IDA 3 2 3 9 9 Governor THOMAS G. PELHAM Secretary BOB MARTINEZ October 15, 1987 Mr. Carmen s. Annunziato Planning Director City of Boynton Beach Post Office Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Dear Mr. Annunziato: Pursuant to section 163.3184, Florida statutes, the Department of Community Affairs has reviewed the proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan for the City of Boynton Beach. Our review indicated that the August 6, 1987, proposed amendments to the Land Use Element are consistent with the provisions of section 163.3177, Florida statutes. Additional comments from the Treasure Co~st Regional Planning Council and Palm Beach County are enclosed for your consideration and possible use during the plan amendment process. If we may be of additional assistance, please feel free to call Mr. James E. Truesdell at (904) 487-4545. WP/jt/r Enclosures cc: Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Palm Beach County Department of Planning, zoning and Bldg. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT. HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT · RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT ... li . , ,~ ~ I ~! :;,j t~ 1 i ~ ,~ ~ A '~ ':1 ~ " 1 ..~ ~~ ~ ,., .oj , " :~ ~,','I:'",~' -~.!' \ .."l~ . , l:; ':1 ,':1 .. . ''\.~ ! :'~ !i F'~ :~ d ~I ?<~ ;~..\ ~~>l ~ '~ '1 ;;l: ~!;' 7. f-"C !~ :,1 ., ;,::~ t-, :~ Li ~,~ ". '" f,1. , " ::\a ,i;;,1 ,'~ treQlU(Ci; COOlt . ~eglr"",-e" . ;. 'l~ '.'.,' ""'..... 01 " plannl(1~ cOUrtt\"~~' f~ ';~,,1ltJ !'t ;<1 ~ September 18, 1987 Mr. Ralph K. Hook Department of Communi ty Affai rs Bureau of Local Resource Planning 2571 Executive Center Circle, East Tallahassee, FL 32301 Subject: City of Boynton Beach Local Government Comprehensive Plan Documen ts Dear Mr. Hook: Pursuant to the requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council reviewed the amendments to the City of Boynton Beach Future Land Use Element at its regu 1 ar meeti n9 on September 18, 1987. The following comments were approved by Council for transmittal to the State Department of Community Affairs pursuant to Sections 163,3184(1)(c) and (2), Florida Statutes, for consideration by the County prior to adoption of the document. oJ Eval uati on The proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element have been reviewed in accordance with the requirements or Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, Council IS review procedures, and Council's adopted plans and policies. The following comment is offered as a result of that review. Based on tilE' information provided, the proposed amendments do not appear to be in confl i c t or i ncons is tent wi tl1 the pol i ci es con tai ned in the Regional Comprehensive Policy Plan. The City should continue to work witn Palm Beach County in addressing traffic impacts to County-maintained roads and in maintaining an acceptable level of service on tne regional roads affected by proposed land use changes. '.i,':~~Jj,.. \~or(:I" t ",I'>':!...;S jim minix vice. chc~rmo,n 3228 s,w, mCHli" down', hive! --suite 205 . p_o, box 1 ~;2) . palm citV. florkk ::'34'10 phone (305) 286 onn ';;,.(;: ',\ ..,. ;';../''l'>lHcr . ,'''', th,: i" ,',' Le nnv, III doniel m. eoI'\! ex<;".,utrve dirc<tor " Mr. Ralph K. Hook Department of Community Affairs September 18, 1987 Page Two If you neeci additional information or have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. 5i01t1Y. . ~-L Dani el M. Cary Executive Director DMC :ks Attachments . ~ ... TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M 0 RAN DUM To: Council Members AGENDA IID1 5C From: Staff Date: September 18, 1987 Council Meeting Subject: . Local Government Comprehensive Plan Review - Amendments to the City of Boynton Beach Future Land Use Element Introduction Pursuant to the provlslons of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, the Council must be provided an opportuni ty to review and comment on comprehensive plan amendments prior to their adoption. The City of Boynton Beach has submitted proposed amendments to the State Department of Communi ty Affai rs, whi ch in turn is seek i n9 Council's comments. Back ground The City of Boyn ton B"each is consi deri ng two amendments to the Future Land Use Element. Locations of the properties under consideration are shown on the accompanyi ng map, and the number of acres and proposed changes in 1 and use designations are summarized in the attached list. Evaluation The proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element have been reviewed in accerdance with the requirements of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, Council's review procedures, and Council's adopted plans and policies. The following comment is offered as a result of that review. Based on the information provided, the proposed amendments do not appear to be in conflict or inconsistent with the policies contained in the Regional Comprehensive Policy Plan. The City should continue to work with Palm Beach County in addressing traffic impacts to County-maintained roads and in maintaining an acceptable level of service on the regional roads affected by proposed land use changes. Recommen~ation Council should adopt the comment outl ined above wi th respect to the Future Land Use Element and approve its transmi ttal to the State Department of Community Affairs in fulfillment of the requir~ments of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. Attachments - ~ _._--~.- I I J' -I ~ .. City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Amendments I , I f I ! 1 I ~ = <C ~ ... ~ :: 0( ... ~ 2 ",YPt)LUXO "'OAD ,'" . J!...- \~ u 1 I "' ,I . I ........... ...INER ROAD r-:::o/ ;' f '(' - 2 .. / : (' 'I --.....: , o <( o :: ..., <..; - '~ i <( ... 'lW 22NO AveNU~ "'ocmo.. ' ::! ~ :> c 3o.,nton a..en ...... 'n 'n '~ . o - .\ OLD BOYNTON 'HI!!T ROAO BOYNTON 6eAC:~ aOUL:;VARO J ..~ ~]~ 'lCRT\.I SiT':: l.OCA T10N MAP - '.... r... .".( c;, I 1,.. r" l Jr-,). -~. .-...." '.' ..... ..""'.. . .. " \"-' r.-:C"'.,:-:etn \.. t{jci:ns. !(e l n.;)rn~~n 'J -,'r: :. 'q;rC'u.$ C.; ;01 ;. :- :;! !(Ju:~r " . ,..,.' :)(.,-rlln'. '., ~J...('n OFFI51 ~ T~E ~OurHI ENGINEER ~t/~ Charles R. Walker, Jr., P.E. Director, Traffic Division ~ CRW/AAE/jd . File: Muoicipalities "80ynton Beach" - .. An Equ~l Opponunuy . Affirmative: Action Employer" ~ :~~~ u ( . ~ . ".' I Ii" ~ l : . ~_ ( . '" r', '. -. , , ; :-! :.: :'<;' " '\. -... , . ..., t..._._ :',-_ .:. .. ...... i . . , . . - ' Apri 1 30, 1987 --.......... ,. : :',,, .. .:,' , ... -. - .{ ...~7 FL4,~\'r.:;, '., _ ,..-:- ll..,~ I [:"~T ......,... - .. ., --- Mr. Carmen S. Annunziato, AIC? Planning Director City of Boynton Beach 200 S. Seacrest Boulevard P .0. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33435 SUBJECT: CITRUS GLEN/LAWRENCE GROVES REVIEW OF TRAFFIC Hi?ACT ANALYSES Dear Mr. Annunziato~ Palm Beach County Traffic Division staff has reviewed traffic impact analyses which you sent to us for the subject developments. The following comments are submitted for your consideration: 1 ) Dedication of:right-of-way should be required in accordance with the Countyis Thoroughfare Right-of~Way Protection Map. Lawrence Road requires an 80' r;ght-of~way and Miner Road a 108' right-of-way. Turn lanes on the internal collecter roadways and all main deveiopment . accesses should be required in accordance with the traffic studies you sent us. SincetMiner Ru~j is~required for site access and traffic distribution, .. the segment of Mi ner Road adj acent to the site shoul d be cons ...:'!cted by the developer as a two lane cross section in accordance with. County standards and over an align~ent that will connect with the segment committed to the east. 2) 3) 4) Payment of traffic impact fees should.be required in accordance with Palm Beach County Ordinance #85-10. . . The opportunity to review these land development traffic impact analyses ;s appreciated. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Hr. Allan Ennis of my staff if you have any questions. Sincerely,_ ~i ,~,,:,.~ .., . ." --.. - - - . ._. -.- -----------------_._---_.....~----_.._--------~-_._-_.._- -_._,_u.___-BOX 1989_!YEST P Bf.ACH. FLORIDA 33402-1989 0: ~~;~:;.= : ~...;~~:~t,~~ _ "~<~,:~::).,,, ~~~:,:t:~;~~~ .. " METROPOLITAN PLANNJNG ORGANIZATION o PALM BEACH COUNTY 160 Australian Avenue. Suite 301. West Palm Beach. FlorIda 33406 Tel (305) 684.4170 September 8, 1 987 ffi\~ 1~~TI5~(7 \ tl', 11Il ',.. . - "'~_ \J~' ~, \ ~ ,- ......., -~ ~ ... - .' ~ ~ . I '1 J ~'., ..,..... .~ v ~~. SEP 1 a 19BZ Mr. Peter G. Merritt, Regional Planner Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council P. O. Box 1529 Palm City, Fl 33490 Subject: City of Boynton Beach land Use Amendments T-..' ,......'7 ,.,...~"':T i1~$ou.; ilt:.tt~:;....;.t- .........~.... ,- .. '" ""'n..'" ~., Q...."..... 'VU~ijU,' . :.,....l..li.oi II ~ Dear Peter: The Metropolitan Planning Organization has reviewed the proposed land use amendments for the City of Boynton Beach and has the following comment. The proposed land use amendments appear to be consistent with designated land uses per the Palm 8 e'a c h C 0 U n t y .. Com pre hen s i v e P 1 an. Sincerely yours, --r;;'~_/, ~ ~fP. 'Cantrell Senior Planner oJ .; ~ TPC:dw ~ ? 0 Box 2429. 'Nes! Palm 8eacn. Fiorlda 33402-2429 ~. ..---..-.-.. lloar~J of County Commissiont' County Administrator Jan \Vinters ~ '.\rol 1\. Roberts, Chair Kenneth M. Adams, Vice Chairman Karen T. Marcus Carol J. Elmquist Dorothy \Vilken Department of Planning, Zoning & Building Jllhn A Lehner Executive Director September 9, 1987 ~. ~\~J2~J~\' !I~ tI ~ I ~'r ~-' ,.......... ''; . '~-4 d 1 ~~)r '_.j, 1',1 \ ~ \or . J V ~:.:. S EP 11 1987 ' Mr. Ralph K. Hook Department of Community Affairs Bureau of Local Resource Planning 2571 Executive Center Circle East Tallahassee, Florida 32399 lU,UUKE CCA3T REilOIW. PWIUItI C1UICll, RE: City of Boynton Beach Land Use Amendments, Citrus Glen and Lawrence Groves Dear Mr. Hook: The Palm Beach County Planning Division has reviewed the proposed amendment requests and has no objections to the requested land use designations. Please see attached comments submitted previous~y to the City. Please be advised that these comments represent the staff analysis of the proposals. It should be noted that the Board of County Commissioners has not taken an official position on these amendments and annexations. Furthermore, these comments do not address the procedures used for public hearings for annexation and plan amendments, ps required by Florida Statutes. .. .; Should y~u have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully, ~ Stan Redick, Planning Director RFM:RWW:jad FILE: JDGEN1\RHOOK cc: Carmen S. Annunziato, Director Sam Shannon, Assistant County Dan Cary, Executive Director, Planning Council City of Boynton Beach Planning' Administrator Treasure Coast Regional 3400 BELVEDERE ROAD . WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33406 . (305) 4.71-3520 .<11 , ,~oard-of County Commissioner - C,lrol A. hoberts, Chair Ken~th M. Adams, Vice Chairman "<Hen T. Marcus ('arol]. Elmquist Dorothy Wilken County Administrator Jan Winters September 9, 1987 Department of Planning, Zoning & Building John A L..hnt'f ~'xe('utivl' Director Mr. Ralph K. Hook Department ox Community Axxairs Bureau ox Local Resource Planning 2571 Executive Center Circle East Tallahassee, Florida 32399 RE: City ox Boynton Beach Land Use Amendments, Citrus Glen and Lawrence Groves Dear Mr. Hook: The Palm Beach County Planning Division has reviewed the proposed amendment requests and has no objections to the requested land use designations. Please see attached comments submitted previously to the City. Please be advised that these comments represent the staxx analysis ox the proposals. It should be noted that the Board ox County Commissioners has not taken an oxiicial position on these amendments and annexations. Furthermore, these comments do not address the procedures, used xor public hearings :for annexation and plan ~endments, as required by Florida Statutes. ... Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this oxxice. Respectxully, 5J:l - Stan Redick, Planning Director RFM:RWW:jad FILE: JDQEN1\RHOOK cc: Carmen S. Annunziato, Director Sam Shannon, Assistant County Dan Cary, Executive Director, Planning Council City ox Boynton Beach Planning Administrator Treasure Coast Regional 3400 BELVEDERE ROAD . WEST r l,M BEACH, FLORIDA 33406 . (305) 471-3520 . l'.lrCli .-\. l,dlt:rts. Chair Kl'nlll'th .\1. :\c1.1ms. \'ice Chairrr }(.lren T, .\l.1TCUS Carol .J.' Umquist D6roth\' \\'ilken Apri~ 16, 1987 LJcpartmcnt of rl:.nning. Zvn,n~ :. :';.1: . .Iu~ln -\ L\."nnc:r t.:\('C'J:I\t; 11.1\";:(("1( ~-.;"- .-....-....- --- ~ '-- -../ - - .. . -- ~; Mr. Carmen Annunziato, AlCP City of Boynton Beach Planning Dept. 200 N. Seacrest Blvd. P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33435 .~.."i; ~"'~f) _.:...; PL..',: ."....; ~ _.- l. Re: Citrus GlenlLawrence Grove Annexations Dear Mr. Annunziato: The County P~anning Division staff has found the requested density proposals of 4.82 du/ac to be consistent with the density range of 8-12 dulac, (Medium-Medium High Residential> permitted for the sites in the County Comprehensive Plan. The fo~~owing table and attached map viII summarize the ~ surrounding developments to help give your staff an idea of the development character of the area. Name o:f" L.and-Use Development Cateqory Zoninq Density Homes at Lawrence L. M RS/PUD 4.35 du/ac l1anor Forest L - M RS/PUD 4.58 dulac Sausa~:Lto Groves . M MH RM/PUD 6.5 du/ac - ... Sandpiper Cove M - MH RM/PUD 8.0 dulac Wh1spering P1nes M - MH AR 6.69 d\,l/ac l1ob:i.le Home Park Sunny South 11 - MH RS 5.1 du/ae Mobile Home Park : ) Please contact our off1ce at 697-4001 if ve can provide further information on this matter. Reapect.:fu.l.ly, (~t~~91~f R1chard F. I'lorley:-:(; ....:'. ,.,^.~ Pr1n7J.p~: Plan.~~r . .':;~:,~t.;;:~t~ RFM: RW: at FILE: GEN4/ ANNUNZIA ,.'.:' .,' :;; , 3400 BELVEDERE ROAD. WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33406 . (305) 471-3520~, ,:...,..',. "" .. '.. .,...." -... ~'". .' ...'."- ....'.. ... ... .'.'... .~.. ..,,~~ .,.".......1( '". ..... ....,:~'I:...~../n.r,.-..:..:i,;,J......."';.:';:-rr.~.... .~~.._l r"."I:.'''' ....... .. . .~ ..-...... ....i.,.;....r~T':.,'..c........ 'to' .. , '1 '.'/I{..ItI'..........f".._...;.I.'f.I~I. ...........:JI--... . :'.~.~.;ii:.'~~.';:f:;;-~.: :~;::-~~,:~,~;:.~:.~J;:~~~~;;.~.::_~ :;~ :.,~~_--:-~jj:=:r. .. ',:: ',,~ .,~..... ,.':.: ::; '~':~":;",:;:' :.::'..':,-,:~,-:.:'~I~~:-_:':)~ ~.~ ~~"';"''fj'~~~~r'.,;'.~~'''''''<~~.''.'' ...~:1l:JI""".,~.,;..'.[i....;:,.\(.;..'.~.~.';~11;.:..'".,.'.'l'1~~'r,.......;.:.:.~~~., .,.......:~.\"q::.:r~,.;....;:\......'~.~''''.'.j'~..>~! _ ~.,..~. ....~.~..~;.... . ._ ...::,\...,.... :~-. .....PlJ.ta~ ~~-:. ''''.1.-_.'-.'' '~" ,.... .....,.,. "'.'''''1"' ..."!');......~ ~..,..,..f~..!'. ( "'.:..l ....,;...1... '~=:~;'LWv"'''~'I..f ;: ..................... . .1. . .....,..,_1~~:......"f\...I,...-.. . ._-. ............. -. f :"-.~ "'.';" . ..,...... ~....1:...:.-'!~':~'~~Wj";T... ',~~..;. ~u.,...,..,. ?\,' ":,,.1 ~." , .., "'<,W~ "~}~"""~,,,, . l.";"'jr,!-'l~.':".;f'-::~ ...... ..-:;~J,:\:o-:.;.r-~:P.i..........!-~\--:-.~~t'c.:;...::z...~~il:r'-~~!~\.J*."lt. . ,P " " ,_.... -P: .:-.-..._~.. "r'~Kli'J~_"\~;.F". -.. .-..~. "....J~....;..;...':-:"..,O'.,... . ."~I(~~W.t;,,..ao-;~~~.-.r.j..~~:.;..~~. fill " '. ' . . ',.:~'"...,,J~,.., - ~ ' .~';."..,. .....'.". -~-.-.-....- ~~.. ___. " ." .....~ ,~."~.~'T":~ 'r ~---...~ _ - -4\r~~atl':i . . . ., . " . MEMORANDUM 29 October 1987 TO: Peter L. Cheney, City Manager FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato, Planning Director RE: Comprehensive Plan Amendments/State Review The State Department of Community Affairs (DCA) has completed its review of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments for Citrus Glen and Lawrence Grove which were forwarded to DCA in August of this year. For your information, attached please find a copy of DCA's response. By copy of this memo, I am requesting the City Attorney and City Clerk to commence ordinance adoption procedures. Ordinances for annexation, Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning will be required. Ca-.- ~ CARMEN S. ANNU IATO /bks cc: City Attorney City Clerk Mr. Alan Miller ~..........-,.--- ~,,,,\:", "._".. . ---....---.... \ . ,,!lE"S,... "y ~ -cpr' :{~-~:f'7~~. - " n11,"",~'" -~:~~~~--:: 2~~J '.(l!;"~L .\~:" ~ , ......,- . ~:rT i'- !_. c ~ - .' ~."" . i 'f: STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 2 5 7 1 E X E CUT I V E C E N T ERe IRe l E, E A ST. TAL l A HAS SEE, F lOR I D A 3 2 3 9 9 BOB MARTINEZ THOMAS G. PELHAM C overnor Secretary October 15, 1987 Mr. Carmen S. Annunziato Planning Director City of Boynton Beach Post Office Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Dear Mr. Annunziato: Pursuant to section 163.3184, Florida statutes, the Department of Community Affairs has reviewed the proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan for the City of Boynton Beach. Our review indicated that the August 6, 1987, proposed amendments to the Land Use Element are consistent with the provisions of section 163.3177, Florida statutes. Additional, comments from the Treasure Coast Regional Planning council and Palm Beach County are enclosed for your consideration and possible use during the plan amendment process. If we may be of additional assistance, please feel free to call Mr. James E. Truesdell at (904) 487-4545. ~ AICP, Director Planning WPjjtjr Enclosures cc: Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Palm Beach County Department of Planning, zoning and Bldg. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT. HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT · RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT ',;.~~!:::7~ pnonc. ,,:,uJ J .i..:H.)-.J:l, .) ,-' Mr. Ralph K. HooK Department or Communi ty Affai rs September 18, 1987 Page Two If you neea additional information or have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sin(!J1Y, X--L. Dan; el M. Cary Executive Director OMC : ks Attachments J .; ~ TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M 0 RAN DUM To: Council Members AGENDA IID1 5C From: Staff Date: September 18, 1987 Council Meeting Subject: -Local Government Comprehensive Plan Review - Amendments to the City of Boynton Beach Future Land Use Element In troduc ti on Pursuant to the provlslons of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, the Counci 1 mus t be provi ded an opportunity to revi ew and comment on comprehensive plan amendments prior to their adoption. The City of Boynton Beach has submitted proposed amendments to the State Department of Co~nunity Affairs, which in turn is seeking Council 's comments. Backgroun~ The City of Boynton Beach is considering two amendments to the Future Land Use Element. Locations of the properties under consideration are shown on the accompanyi ng map, ana the number of acres and proposed changes in 1 and use designations are summarized in the attached list. Evaluation The proposed amendmen ts to the Future Land Use El ement have been revi ewed in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, Counci l' 5 revi ew procedures, and Counci l' s adopted pl ans and pol i ci es. The following comment is offered as a result of that review. IBased on the information provided, the proposed amendments do not appear to be in conflict or inconsistent with the policies contained in the Regional Comprehensive Policy Plan. The City should continue to work with Palm Beach County in addressing traffic impacts to County-maintained roads and in maintaining an acceptable level of service on the regional roads affected by proposed land use changes. Recommendation Council stlOuld adopt the comment outl ined above wi th respect to trle Future Land Use Element and approve its transmittal to the State Department of Community Affairs in fulfillment of the requirements of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. At tac hmen ts City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Amendments I "1YPt')LUXO ~aAO ,--. - , I I I I I I = ~ -1 \ I I , I I i I \ .~ i I I -2 I , ' ( , / ( I -~ . : ~ ~~f,~i ~~ '. ' , , ,"';. -' . ' ......... ""HER ROAO :-. ~"., 2:NO AVE~UI! ...' . I ... . I = <( :: .. ~ o <( "" - "'atora.. .u .~ <C ... ~ ~ - ::i 3 <( ~ -' ;> <( , I ..~ \ I 3a.,"~ Oft a..en "'all 'Il 'Il '.u - ~ ~t.D eOYHTOH '~e~T ~OAO eOYHTt')N aEAC:-i eOUL~V(j,RO S2T'E !.OCA Tl0N MAP I ~ ':CRTU ."_..__.~,--"-,---_._-----_._---- :. ~, (It f :. .. ..~. '.: {I';') ~ . I \ ; .~ :..' :...... !- ( , ~.. j., : " - - ~ :.:.. !" , " ,"'" '"'t <<; \.. '.. ,I'" "'- ""r...), \........ .' . .,_.. .' ,'\ f \ ~...,~. \.... i-' ":)..~,.,.....n ,......C'...~l.~n ',. 'tJCI.....~. ll...e \", ~.,_J"._._. - ,. ~ J ... t' ~ :. \ ..~ r C ~ $ C ,: ; 0 J ;. ::: l ! <J U : M .~ , , . . . ;' J(<(H n", '>. \j"CI: ". ' . ...~ c...._"_ ':,_ .:... ..".. i . . . . April 30, 1987 -----..... ,. .. ::, ....;~,.. _ .to' ' "\ "., '".~ I FL4f" r.~;, '., ,..~ 11'1\;': ri~~T .-,. - .. ., -- Mr. Carmen S. Annunziato, ArC? Planning Director City of Boynton Beach 200 S. Seacrest Soulevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33435 SUBJECT: CITRUS GLEN/LAWRErlCE GROVES REVIEW OF TRAFFIC Hi?ACT ANALYSES Dear Mr. Annunziato~ Palm Beach County Traffic Division staff has reviewed traffic imoact analyses which you sent to us for the subject developments. The following comments are submitted for your consideration: 1 ) Dedication of:right-of-way should be reqUired in accordance with the County's Thoroughfare Right-of-Way Protection Mac. Lawrence Road requires an 80' right-of-way and Miner Road a 108' right-of-way. Turn lanes on the internal collecter roadways and all main development' accesses should be required in accordance with the traffic studies you sent us. Z} 3) Since:Hiner Rv~j is'required for site access and traffic distribution, the segment of 11iner Road adjacent to the site should be cons..."!cted by the developer as a two lane cross section in accordance with. County standards and over an align~ent that will connect with the seg~ent committed to the east. 4) Payment of traffic impact fees should,be required in accordance with Palm Beach County Ordinance #85-10. The opportunity to review these land development traffic impact analyses is appreci a ted. Pl ease do not hes ita te to contact me or r1r . All an Ennis of my staff if you have any questions. Sincerely,_ OFFI;5 ~ T~E jCOUray ENGIilEER ~t/~ Charles R. Walker, Jr., P.E. Director, Traffic Division )ltrt. CRW/AAE/jd . File: MUojcipal Hies nSoynton Seachn, '" .. An Equ;al OpportuOIty - AffirmuIVe Action Employer ~, -_ .,_...__" -BOX 1989 _~YEST P RF.ACH, FLORIDA 33402-1989 '.r;'~~.~ ":. _:;'.:;,~ : ~...;~~:.~t~: '~,' ~~;,~. ,:.:'~, ,.' ~'::,~!;~,~I~~ METROPOLITAN PLANl'llNG ORGANIZATION o PALM BEACH COUNTY 160 Australian Avenue. SUite 301. 'Nest Palm Beach Florida 33406 Tel (3051684.<1170 September 8, 1987 r-...~: r"'I ~"\l\? ~ \ t"' ~ '\ !~ i r::, ~ '~_ ; i ' '{ I \. t. .\ \\.- t : ,.. ,- .,~_ \.i~. ~ \ . " ""- , -~ ~ r,,:~ ..;.;:. -- -'~j u !.L~' S Eli 1 a lSBZ Mr. Peter G. Merritt, Regional Planner Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council P. O. Box 1529 ?alm City, FL 33490 ""'r ........~~..Il.f. T:,""u~,....."",,":, ~"'~-, ~:""~iCJ~ ...~..\~:;""...u.. ........w ".- 0'- t" 4"'tn.."'''.' ?:';'.il~l.... \"wU.iU'" Subject: City of Boynton Beach Land Use Amendments Dear Peter: The Metropolitan Planning Organization has reviewed the proposed land use amendments for the City of Boynton Beach and has the fall owi ng comment. The proposed 1 and use amendments appear to be consistent with designated land uses per the Palm Be-ach County .'Comprehens i ve Pl an. Sincerely yours, -r;;~_// ~ ~~. 'Cantrell Senior Planner .. .- .... TPC:dw ;J a 80x 2429. 'Nest Palm Beacn ~;ofl(:la 33402-2429 Boar~.1 of County Commissioll' County Administrator Jan \V inters t'Mol 1\. Roberts, Ch,lir I'cl1l1clh ;\'1. Adams, Vice Ch.lirlll,lIl I'arcn T. Marcus Carol J. Elmguist Dorothy \Vilken Department of Planning, Zoning & Building John /I Lchncr I-.xeculivc Director September 9, 1987 ~\?d':~;'1, '!'\. n V 1 ~ ,V",.) ".") " . ,~. "',~ . ~~ ~-' v,.'..... '., '-.-'4~' ,\ . J ,_- _~ ' , , .~. ,n ',0 j u l~:': S ~p 11 1937 ' Mr. Ralph K. Hook Department OI Community AIIairs Bureau OI Local Resource Planning 2571 Executive Center Circle East Tallahassee, Florida 32399 l!LUU~E CCAH Rc.ilO.w. rW'UJti ceUJl~lL RE: City of Boynton Beach Land Use Amendments, Citrus Glen and Lawrence Groves Dear Mr. Hook: The Palm Beach County Planning Division has reviewed the proposed amendment requests and has no objections to the requested land use designations. Please see attached comments submitted previous~y to the City. Please be advised that these comments represent the staII analysis OI the proposals. It should be noted that the Board OI County Commissioners has not taken an oIIicial position on these amendments and annexations. Furthermore, these comments do not address the procedures used for public hearings Ior annexation and plan amendments, ~s required by Florida Statutes. .. . -a Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this oIIice. RespectIully, ~ Stan Redick, Planning Director RFM:RWW:jad FILE: JDGENl\RHOOK cc: Carmen S. Annunziato, Director Sam Shannon, Assistant County Dan Cary, Executive Director, Planning Council City of Boynton Beach Planning Administrator Treasure Coast Regional 3400 BELVEDERE ROAD WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33406 . (305) 471-3520 M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: Mr. Carmen Annunziato Planning Director DATE: June 16, 1987 !;' I !. I j'j(f( , \. ' ~ \ PLA~~ i~ I i ~G 0CPT. FROM: Betty S. Boroni City Clerk RE: 6/23/87 Plann..ing & Zoniul;1 Board Public Hearing I' Attached please find a letter from Mrs. Leila Foster in response to the ~rence Grove$ and ~itrus G~ adver- tisements. Also, a letter from Doris pessagno in response to the Rhodes Properties advertisement. All are scheduled to be heard by the ~lanning & Zoning Board on June 23. ~/~ Bett S. Boroni BSB/smk Attachments cc: City Manager City Commission p&Z Board Members - I (-~: .,~ J:~\ ti I' '--' ~ ~ " .......... -. >" U" c.., -<;' . , :~' ;"1/- /Ii-.-r\ \~ \< \)/\. -'~ Planning & ionlng Board and City Commission of The City of Boynton Beach. Florida Boynton Beach City Hall. 120 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 3)425-0)10 June 9,1987 R.D.# 4-Bo:x:J90 Oswego. N. Y. 13126 ~ Gentlemen. This is in reply to the requested zoning'change involved in petition number ~~ The following problems will arise and should be thought about before they occur. (l)--The farm has irrigation pumps that run 24 hours daily during the growing season and during the summer months if flooding is necessary. Flood pumps will run 24 hours daily during heavy rains or times of high water. (2)--Our property has been in agriculture for 44 years and will probably remain so for several more years. I wish that The City of Boynton Beach Zoning Board will respect the agricultural Zoning which was on the tax rolls originally and give us a chance to survive. My property also has a labor camp which has been there for years~ and will have to be continued to successfully operate any farming operation. (3)--The canals or drainage ditches around the farm have been there for years and the dykes made from the dirt that was excavated from the ditches. We must have the canals for irrigation and drainage, and the dykes to prevent flooding and also to permit controlled flooding for treatment of soil diseases. (4)--The farm is and has been sprayed with helicopter and airplane's for several years so we would like the city alerted as to the problems that may arise.. (5)--The Lake Worth Drainage District has maintained a constant set water table in Lateral #20 irrigation and drainage canal for years and all of our pumps and culverts have been set for this level and would be impossible to change. (6)--There will be trucks loading all times of day or night, entering or leaving the farm. Tractors will run when needed 24 hours a day, during cold nights or heavy rains. (7)--Helicopters are hired to fly cold nights, flying over the crops to keep frost away. They fly with spotlights to see the field. (8)--We have in the past also had air boats circle the farm to keep air circulating to keep frost from settleing~ (9)--We have burned old tires for frost protection in the past, today we would probably bur~ fuel oil and sawdust placed in drums. to make _a fog to protect from frost.. ,. (lO)-Roads are sandy. and very dusty and I would think a big problem for anyhouseing development, next to agriculture. (ll)-We are not alone. there are other farms, orange groves, nursery's in the immediate area who will also need to survivelD (12)-We just want to be lef~ alone. Agricultur~ a~ our source of income we are greatly ooncerneq with the.problems of a housing development next to us. (13)-ls this tobe another City of Boynton Beach shanty town oris it to be a well planned community of which we as ntighbors aan be proud of ?? (14)-Why were we never notified, when the Whispering Pines Mobile Home Park was put next to us. The uncontrolled ohildrenhave broken all of windows out of buildings, wrecked trucks, cars. shot holes in tractors. sanded motors and ~eat and banged every tractor that we have. They -also shot holes through the mail boxes.:,Are we to assume that this new housing development will be any different.?? (lS)-Why were we never notified by The Palm Beach County Board of Commissioners and The Planning. Zoning, &: Building Departments. When The City of Boynton Beach applied for a zoning change on their Lawrence road latrene and sewer and water lines ??????? Above are some of the reasons why city will never be the same as country. Very truly y,ours. .... ~~.~ Mrs. Leila Foster R.D.# 4-Box 390 Oswego. New York 13126 June ';!, j,';I87 R. D.A!~-:3or 390 OSNego, New York 13126 Planning and Zoning Board and City Commission of The City of Boynton Beach, Florida Boynton Beach City Hall 120- East Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0)10 .. Gentlemen. This is in regard to rezoning application made by Knollwood Orange Groves Inc., and Lawrence Groves owned by John & Anita Van Hezewyk, eo trustees petition number 1,&,2 for Intracoastal Developement Inc. agents -Michael Do Gordon, c/o Boose, Casey, Ciklin et, ale Enrico RossI, c/o Rossi and Molavasi engineers, Inc,. Project name-Citrus Glen and Lawrence Groves., These new homes will undoubtedly cost enough, requiring both parents to work to pay for them. I began to think, who would take of these children, would they run wild, like the children did from whispering Pines??? The Whispering Pines Park has swimming pools, playground Equipment, Clubhouse and Entertainment for them, but were still unable to keep them wi thlm their bounda.rieso Whispering Pines 1s a rented park and they have already shifted from families to retired adults, making a tremendous difference to our problem. However Citrus Glen & Lawrence Groves projects will be sold to numerous buyers. who may or may not have any control over their children???? I guess we can only hope & pray that these new owners will sereen the prospective buyers well before they move In. We understand there ls to be a new miner road from \: ) Congress Avenue to the I11l1tary Trail. If this is correct this will relieve some of the trafflo problem. Gentlemen, will your grandchildren and mine despise us for allowing the future to become concrete jungles, with a shrinking supply of farms to produce food?????? I have a necessary request tor The Lawrence Groves project. Where their east b~undary line boarders Foster property, I request a 6 foot high wire fence with barbed wire strands on both sides of the top of the fence. This ,should discourage any wander's from straying our way. In closing, I would like to remind Mr. Boose that at a planni'ng meeting, March 12. 1981. he stated. that he could live with all of Foster's farming operation.,prpblems. I'm really not too concerned, trying to cope with Mr. Boose. however I'm very ooncerned with trying to get along with his numerous buyers. These people have purchased a-home and will w~ sh to control and use the surrounding area. ,. . Gentlemen, Ihave stated the facts that I; can see, will arise from a housing development so close to agriculture. Very truly yours, /~~ Mrs. Leila Foster B.D.#4-Box 390 Oswego, New York 13126 . .. -/() J,. '-/1' /.' ,)'j~.' ,~;. J (.'~.' ,. -(';" /L-7 l -~~ ..- J v- - ,'; _ I ~o)--~, J 00 q cf;~JJ:!-J./...Jd' /U'7LZ... .,/\).)-' 11...-/ /,', , -7 ~ 3 - LL ~ ~ -' &. \./ / >.' ~~~, -r ---01. ~ . - t de. -:; I -35'~' ,,\\.\y~ ,. /' \ (j0v--v.t?1J!-/.:i')"~ fI~ -- ( '( .),,,'" ../ IJ- ...... f'.,,\ r:::"1~ ~~, ~~\.i\' ,(",,.0"', y .-)')71 I \-:}O\.A. .-:- . )''';'-- , I) -! ", ~~-- &t-t~J--- ~ --i:...t~ ~f U0J~ ~\)"\\ :~i\~1\: :- !) - 0 ~~'" \:}-~~ 1 ~ 0, ~7~ 3 / D #- # {fJ''::::' .- - - , .,/.-. ---< ' '\? t80-u,(l0.t'\\ ~l -3~. -:s:3 '(- -3 ~ :'1( " ',.\ \ ' U I .' ,. ~ ~ t&:tJ:1 .<1. &vurJ~ ~t.k -&~ f<Yu ~ Cvvt.J2 . .- ~ c~~rn&>1 ~~.1b ~ ~ f&-&.du '?J~L~ ;::~ ~ ~~ ~! J. J/~. l.Hu.L '-"6 0?'tLf ~ ~:Uv.,. rnv~ o-D ~ Cl.kUL ~ ~ ~ ~f~' . 2'~~~1u.~1/~ 'wvu1~~ ~ ~J~~o--d~' 3. Sl.+ ~ rY1-6-t rnR..L~ ~ -:;dU.Ah cUu.- ~ ~~~ -zk. ~muvk1 ;n~ ~.~ trn-~ .tf~ ~ ~QA~~" ~4.) ~U2.- k~ ~~ ~ cd- ~ 1/'kj ~ ~ ~ .~ JUr~ -iw.~ ~~ ~ tP~~ '~ ::L2 I ICfg7 ~ &-( d!tA"lA. ~ ----- ----- ----. ----- MEMORANDUM June 11, 1987 TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS, PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD FROM: CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR RE: REQUESTS FOR ANNEXATION, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT AND REZONING SUBMITTED BY MICHAEL D. GORDON FOR INTRACOASTAL DEVELOPMENT, INC. INTRODUCTION Michael D. Gordon, agent for Intracoastal Development, Inc., applicant, is proposing to annex into Boynton Beach a 53.604 acre tract of land located at the south-east corner of Lawrence Road and Miner Road extended. (See Exhibit "A".) This property is currently zoned AR (Agriculture Residential) and it is occupied by a mature orange grove which is no longer in commercial production. The Grove is heavily overgrown with exotics, particularly Brazilian Pepper and Australian Pines. Paralleling this request for annexation is a request to amend the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan t.o show annexed land as Low Density Residential, and to rezone this property to a Planned Unit Development with a Land Use Intensity =4 (PUD w/LUI=4). The proposed PUD, to be named "Citrus Glen", provides for the construction of 250 fee simple units, including 132 zero lot line, single-family detached units and 118 duplex units, with a gross density of 4.66 dwelling units per acre (see Exhibit liB"). PROCEDURE These applications for annexation, amendment to the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and rezoning are being processed consistent with State Statutes, and Boynton Beach Codes, Ordinances and Resolutions as follows: 1. F.S. 163.3161: Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act. 2. F.S. 166.041: Procedures for Adoption of Ordinances and Resolutions. 3. F.S. 171.011: Municipal Annexation and Contraction Act. 4. Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, Appendix A, Section 3A5(e): Boundary and Zoning. -2- 5. Boynton Beach Ordinance #79-24. 6. Boynton Beach Resolution #76-X: Procedures for Annexation. 7. Boynton Beach Ordinance #86-54: Comprehensive Plan Evalua- tion and Appraisal Report. These regulations have been listed for informational purposes. Paraphrasing, these regulations require review by the City Department Heads, newspaper advertisements, public hearings with the Planning and zoning Board and the City Commission and Commis- sion adoption of ordinances to annex, amend the Future Land Use Element and rezone. CURRENT LAND USE AND ZONING As previously discussed, this property is undeveloped and zoned AR (Agricultural Residential). The land use and zoning in the surrounding area varies and is presented for your information in the table which follows: DIRECTION JURISDICTION ZONING LAND USE North Palm Beach County AR Mobile Home Park (Whispering Pines) East Boynton Beach PUOW/ LUI=4 Melear Planned Unit Development (future City water storage facility) Palm Beach County RS Mobile Home Park (Sunny South Estates) South Palm Beach County AR Undeveloped, mature citrus grove (Boynton Nurseries,Inc.) West Palm Beach County AR Undeveloped, mature citrus grove and nursery (Boynton Nurseries, Inc.) -3- FUTURE LAND USE AND REZONING Hypoluxo Road forms the northern limit of the City's Reserve Annexation Area and the City's Utility Service Area. Lawrence Road forms the western limit of the City's Reserve Annexation Area as set forth by the Commission's policy, which is reflected in the Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report. It is contemplated that all lands between Lawrence Road and Congress Avenue on the south side of Hypoluxo Road will at some time in the future be annexed. This proposal represents a continuation of previous actions to close unincorporated pockets in this portion of the reserve annexation area. The land use category requested, Low Density Residential, is lower than that which exists to the east in the City, and to north, south, and west in Palm Beach County. As noted in the correspondence in Exhibit "c" from the Palm Beach County Plan- ning Department, the proposed land use is consistent with ~he current development pattern and the future plans for land use in Palm Beach County for this area. Although the grove has not been utilized for commercial production for some time, and it is currently overgrown with exotics, there are still mature citrus trees which exist on-site. It is recommended that the existing citrus trees in the grove be preserved to the greatest extent possible and incorporated as an amenity to the proposed project as outlined in the memorandum from the Forester/Horticulturist which appears in Exhibit "C". COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES There are three policies in the Comprehensive Plan which address annexations as follows: 1. "Annex only property which is reasonably contiguous to present municipal boundaries;" 2. "Annex property only after the preparation of a study evaluating the fiscal benefits of annexation versus the cost of providing service;" and 3. "Annex only properties which are of sufficient size to pro- vide efficient service and on which urban development is anticipated." In order to determine the consistency of the Intracoastal Development Company request with the Comprehensive Plan Policies, each of the three policies will be addressed individually. Policy 1 - "Annex only property which is reasonably contiguous to the present municipal boundaries." -4- The Intracoastal Development Company property is contiguous with present corporate limits along a portion of its eastern property boundary (approximately 610 feet or 10% of its entire boundary), and its western boundary is coterminous with Lawrence Road. In addition, this property lies in the path of urban development. Policy 2 - "Annex property only after the preparation of a study evaluating the fiscal benefits of annexation versus the costs of providing services." In response to policy two, you will find in Exhibit "C", the cost to the City of annexing this parcel and the dollars returned to the City in taxes. Policy 3 - "Annex only properties which are of sufficient size to provide efficient service and on which urban development is anticipated." As previously reported, the Intracoastal Development Company tract is 53.60 acres in size. It is anticipated that this parcel will experience urban development for the following reasons: 1. The availability of public utilities within the Lawrence Road right-of-way; 2. The existence of this parcel as a County pocket in a develop- ing portion of the Reserve Annexation Area, as outlined in the correspondence from the Palm Beach County Planning Department in Exhibit "C"; 3. The efficiency of services to be provided when analyzed in connection with existing property on Lawrence Road currently in the City (Knollwood Groves), the proposed 48.231 acre Lawrence Groves annexation, and the proximity to developing properties within Palm Beach County; and 4. Recent and proposed improvements to the surrounding road system, including the four (4) laning of Hypoluxo Road, the the proposed six (6) laning of Boynton Beach Boulevard from Congress Avenue to Military Trail, the proposed five (5) laning of Old Boynton Road from Knuth Dairy Road to Military Trail, and the proposed four (4) laning of Military Trail from Old Boynton Road to Hypoluxo Road. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Department recommends that the applications submitted by Michael D. Gordon, for Intracoastal Development Company Inc., trustee, be approved subject to the comments listed in this memorandum as Exhibit "C". This recommendation is based in part on the following: -5- 1. The parcel is contiguous to Corporate limits; 2. The parcel lies within a County pocket and it is in the path of urban development; 3. The parcel is located within the City's municipal service area; 4. The intensity of land use desired is appropriate for the location; 5. The request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies for annexation; 6. The land use category requested must be considered as a part of an overall strategy for annexation and it is appropriate; 7. The zoning is consistent with the proposed use of the site; 8. The request will not impair the value or future use of lands in the surrounding area and, 9. The costs to serve versus the benefits received indicate a positive return for the City. CA~~S~~~ CSA:ro cc City Manager Technical Review Board Central File MEMORP.NDUM 16 April 1987 TO: Technical Review Board FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato, Planning Director RE: Special Technical Review Board Meeting Please be advised that on Thursday, April 30, 1987 at 9:00 a.m. there will be a special meeting of the Technical Review Board. The purpose of this meeting will be to review the master plans distributed at the April 16th meeting for the following: 1. Citrus Glen PUD 2. Lawrence Groves PUD 3. Boynton Beach Village Center PCD All plans and supporting documents are available in the Planning Department for your review prior to the meeting. Thank you for your attendance. ~ G~__-. ~ -----.:;r CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO /bks MEMORANDUM 15 April 1987 TO: Peter L. Cheney, City Manager FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato, Planning Director RE: Citrus Glen - Annexation Accompanying this memorandum you will find a copy of an application for annexation submitted by Michael D. Gordon for Intracoastal Development, Inc., applicant. Mr. Gordon is proposing to annex a 53.604 acre tract of land located at the southeast corner of Lawrence Road and Miner Road extended. In addition, you will find legal descriptions for a City owned lift station and two rights-of-way impacted by this annexation which should be incorporated (a portion of Lawrence Road and the L.W.D.D. L-20 Canal adjacent to this property). Please place this item on the Commission Agenda for the April 21, 1987 meeting for the Commission's consideration and for forwarding to the Planning and Zoning Board for public hearings. {~:s. ~ CARMEN S. ANNBNZIATO /bks cc: Central File " CITRUS GL ~N LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND BEING THE WEST THREE-QUARTERS (W.3/4) OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF (N.1/2) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (N.W.1/4) OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS, HOWEVER, THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR L.W.D.D. CANAL L20, BEING THE NORTH 50.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION, AND LESS THE RIGHT OF WAY fOR LAWRENCE ROAD, (AN 80.00 FEET RIGHT OF WAY); EXCEPTING THEREFROM, THE WEST 140 FEET OF THE SOUTH 140 FEET OF THE NORTH 248 FEET OF SAID PARCEL. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND RIGHTS OF WAY OF RECORD. CONTAINING: 53.60 ACRES- TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT CANAL L-20 RIGHT OF WAY ABUTTING THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THAT PORTION OF LAWRENCE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY ABUTTING THE WEST PROPERTY LINE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND TOGETHER WITH THE WEST 140 FEET OF THE SOUTH 140 FEET OF THE NORTH 248 FEET OF SAID PARCEL. .' - ,"