REVIEW COMMENTS
c<>v(C.rp~
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Carrie Parker, City Manager
Tambri Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director~
March 1, 1995
TO:
DATE:
SUBJECT: Information Requested Relative to Citrus Park and
Surrounding Development
In response to the above-referenced request, I am providing you
with a) comments from Palm Beach County relative to Citrus Park PUD
and traffic improvements; b) the Citrus Park approval schedule in
chronological format; and c) a traffic study (copies) for all other
developments that empty onto Lawrence Road in the vicinity of the
Ci trus Park PUD. Please note that excluded from the traffic
reports are the studies for the Lawrence Lake PUD (we are still
searching our files for this document), and for Lawrence Oaks and
Sausalito Groves. Since the latter two projects were approved in
the County we do not possess a traffic study for them (we have
requested these documents from Palm Beach County.
TJH:mr
/f~
.rr1f 5/~'e:s
~\ ,<\c..\\JyL-
Kl\...l~&~
L~.~ ~e-G;;"",,,<!'-,,
.-p....+-. t-J--,)' -
'( (I-lu.....tte;...,-
LfA..\.g~~ L'-4c ~
c:frv!'> 6~.,
C\{Y">J":.> p...... ~
!!R : LIUlROAD . CP
Boa~d ~f County CO~~iSSi~-~~r,IJ_' l
a) COMMENTS FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY
Carol A. Roberts, Chair
Kenneth'M. Adams, Vice Chairman
Karen T. Marcus
Carol J. Elmquist
Dorothy Wilken
County Administrator
Jan Winters
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
H. F. Kahlert
County Engineer
December 2, 1987
Mr. Carmen S. Annunziato
Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach
200 N. Seacrest Blvd.
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
SUBJECT: CITRUS GLEN PHASE II/ADDITION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL "pn/LAWRENCE LAKE
Dear Mr. Annunziato:
As requested, the Palm Beach County Traffic Division staff has reviewed the
plans and traffic impact analyses for the above mentioned developments. The
following comments are provided for your consideration:
1. If Citrus Glen Phase II and Lawrence Lake were being reviewed under
the County's new Traffic Performance Standards (County Ordinance 87-18),
the 4-lane widening of Hypo1uxo Road between Congress Avenue and 1-95
would be required to be under construction before illY bUilding permits
could be pulled. Also, the amount of background traffic growth to be
considered during the "5-7 year buildout" of these projects would be
far greater in most cases under the new Ordinance.
2. The County anticipates adopting in the near future a 110' cross-section
to replace the old 108' cross-section included in its Thoroughfare
Right-Of-Way Protection Map. The plat for Citrus Glen should, there-
fore, show a 110' right-af-way corridor for Miner Road.
3. There appears to be an under-assignment of peak hour trips to the
southern access to Ci trus G1 en Phase II from Lawrence Road. Given the
50%/50% distribution of trips to north/south Lawrence Road, and the
locations of the two Lawrence Road accesses with respect to the 106
units in Citrus Glen Phase II, it is likely that sufficient traffic
would use the south access in the peak hours to warrant separate
westbound 1 eft and ri ght turn egress 1 anes onto Lawrence Road without
schobl traffic included. It is also possible that sufficient southbound
left turn traffic on Lawrence Road would exist during the PM peak hour
at the southern access to Citrus Gl en Phase II to warrant a separate
turn lane.
.. An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer
BOX 2429 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402-1989 (305) 684-4000
-,
..
page 2
Please do not hesitate to contact me or Allan Ennis, of my staff, if you have
questions concerning these comments.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
~.!/~
Charles R. Walker, Jr., P.E.
Director - Traffic Division
4A1..
CRW:AAE:te
File: Municipality - "Boynton Beach"
b) CITRUS PARK PUD - CHRONOLOGY OF APPROVAL PROCESS
ACTION
l:MME
UNITS
APPROVAL DATE
00. ro.
Annexation
Citrus Glen Phase II
AKA Citrus Park
12-6-88
88-48
Rezonedl
Master plan
Approval
Citrus Glen Phase II
AKA Citrus Park
lOG
12-6-88
88-51
*Rezonedl
Master Plan
Approval
Citrus Park PUD
113
9-19-89
89-30
Pre. Plat
Citrus Park pun
113
3-20-90
3-2~<.x)
5th Time
Extension
since PP
Citrus Park PUD
1-10-95
Final Plat
Currently being processed by City-
NOTE:
*The original master plan approved on 12-6-88 was substantially modified consequently
requiring a totally new master plan. Changes from the original master plan approved on 9-19-
89 included removal of the 5-acre public park, removal of the roadway connecting Citrus Park
with Citrus Glen, and the addition of 7 dwelling units.
2) There was a bit of a controversy over development around Citrus Park. She asked
specifically that:
a) the Planning Department get a traffic' study for the area and
also obtain the County traffic standards for Citrus Park.
b) the Planning Department put together a listing of dates for
rezonings, etc. for Citrus Park from start to finish.
c) the Planning Department obtain traffic reports for all other
developments which empty onto Lawrence Road.
-( . .,~
1~JL
:~ I~
-* d1~~ ~d:}
I . .. 11;; c/.
1 ~/ ~ ,-
1 f~ ~/C~~z:F-.
'~~~.l;) .
Q
,;2 ~(>2 Ac-<-
C'tfyc s rCLt" (~
l'
9/ ;. Ci- 5.~. p.
C/fy-v <) 6 (e~" ..J.L
f ~s~ u
C 'l '\<.... ~ G (E ",,,-- ,K
C-'\~Vs 1>0.-, i..
C'l-rrllS 'fc.L,i
,"-
~fJ
-
-
A nY''''' "f~,,-9-
:J{K -to ?uu ~.o
r<.e c: -'Y'\. eO -
"Kc.c.""'l'e.Q
iYl~
& ~ton $'
T\-~ "A'~+
/;<-(,- Sg
tg - '/;
l::l-,,-~(
1-11-g,
1~-sl
.,....
.,
r~ );Tv
~
~
~
MEMORANDUM NO. 93 - 3 8 J~J ,(; .
April l6, 1993 (lDi'1 ~Jl f~~ f?
c..~r ) ;-{;.v )
J. Scott Miller, City Man~ger,~ ~"OI
Jim Cherof, City Attorney' iOJ.- \ ' rvJft
Citrus Glen Limited Partnership vs. City of
Boynton Beach
Case No. CL 91-8073 AA
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Enclosed is a copy of the City's Counterclaim for damages
against Citrus Glen. Please note that by this Counterclaim the
City seeks recovery of those funds necessary to construct Miner
Road.
cc: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
Central File
..- - ..-.
. ~~
RECEIVED-
I\PR ~ 1
PLANNING OE::PT.
RECEIVED
APR 1 6 i:: j
CtTYMANAGER'SOFACE
CITRUS GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
a Florida limited partnership,
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND
FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NO. CL91-8073 AA
Plaintiff,
JUDGE:
EDWARD ROGERS
Defendant.
RECEIV ~L
APR n (,j ~~:1"'3
. U.:.1
crrv ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
vs.
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH,
a municipal corporation,
/
DEFENDANT, CITY'S, ANSWER TO
AMENDED COl\1PLAINT AND COUNT~CLAIM FOR DAMAGES
The Defendant, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH (UCITYU), by and through
his undersigned attorneys files its Answer and Defenses to
Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and states as follows:
1. The allegations contained in Paragraph 1 are admitted.
2. The allegations contained in Paragraph 2 are admitted.
3. The Defendant, CITY, adopts and incorporates herein by
reference its responses to paragraphs 1 and 2 above.
4. The Defendant, CITY, admits that Count I of the Amended
complaint seeks injunctive relief but denies that Count I states a
cause of action and further denies that Plaintiff is entitled to
any relief.
5. The allegations contained in Paragraph 5 are admitted.
6. The allegations contained in Paragraph 6 are admitted.
7. As to the allegations contained in Paragraph 7, it is
admitted that the easterly third of Miner Road has been constructed
and it is further admitted that the westerly portion of Miner Road
1
CASB HO. CL91-8073 AA
has not been constructed. All remaining allegations contained in
Paragraph 7 are denied.
8. wih respect to the allegations contained in Paragraph 8,
it is admitted that Plaintiff, CITRUS GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
("CITRUS GLENn), has obligated itself to construct a portion of
Miner Road and that a bond has been posted to guarantee
construction of the road. All remaining allegations contained in
Paragraph 8 are denied.
9. The Defendant, CITY, is without sufficient knowledge at
this time to specifically admit or deny the allegations contained
in Paragraph 9 and therefore denies same and demands strict proof
thereof.
10. As to the allegations contained in Paragraph 10, it is
admitted that the middle section of Miner Road has not yet been
constructed. All remaining allegations contained in Paragraph 10
are denied.
11. The allegations contained in Paragraph 11 are admitted.
12. with respect to the allegations contained in
Paragraph 12, the Defendant, CITY, admits that Plaintiff, CITRUS
GLEN, sought an additional extension of time to perform its
obligation to construct a portion of Miner Road. All remaining
allegations contained in Paragraph 12 are denied.
13. As to the allegations contained in Paragraph 13, it is
admitted that the Defendant, CITY, has demanded that CITRUS GLEN
honor its obligation to construct a portion of Miner Road and that
2
CASB NO. CL91-8073 AA
to date plaintiff, CITRUS GLEN, has refused to perform its
obligation. It is further admitted that the Defendant, CITY, has
demanded that CITRUS GLEN, as principal, and the American Insurance
Company, as surety, honor their obligations under the bond posted
to guarantee construction of the road. All remaining allegations
contained in Paragraph 13 are denied.
14. The allegations contained in Paragraph 14 are denied.
15. The allegations contained in Paragraph 15 are denied.
16. The allegations contained in paragraph 16 are denied.
17. The allegations contained in Paragraph 17 are denied.
18. The allegations contained in Paragraph 18 are denied.
19. The Defendant, CITY, adopts and incorporates herein by
reference its responses to Paragraphs 1 and 2 above.
20. The Defendant, CITY, admits that Count II seeks an award
of damages, but denies that Count II states a cause of action for
damages and further denies that Plaintiff is entitled to any
relief.
21. The allegations contained in Paragraph 21 are admitted.
22. With respect to the allegations contained in
Paragraph 22, it is admitted that the easterly third of Miner Road
has been constructed and that the westerly two-thirds of Miner Road
have not yet been constructed. All remaining allegations contained
in Paragraph 22 are denied.
23. The allegations contained in Paragraph 23 are denied.
24. The allegations contained in Paragraph 24 are denied.
3
CASH NO. CL91-8073 AA
25. The allegations contained in paragraph 25 are denied.
26. The allegations contained in Paragraph 26 are denied.
27. The allegations contained in Paragraph 27 are denied.
28. The allegations contained in Paragraph 28 are denied.
29. The allegations contained in Paragraph 29 are denied.
30. Each and every allegation of the Amended Complaint which
is not specifically admitted hereinabove is denied.
31. The Amended Complaint fails to state a cause of action
for injunctive relief and/or damages under Florida law.
32. The Defendant, CITY, has sovereign immunity for the
conduct complained of.
33. The Amended Complaint fails to allege compliance and the
Plaintiff has failed to comply with the written notice of claim
requirement set forth in Florida statutes S768.28(6).
34. The Defendant, CITY, is entitled to all of the terms,
benefits and limitations of liability set forth in Florida statutes
S768.28 et. seq.
35. Plaintiff's damages, if any, were caused in whole or in
part by Plaintiff's own negligent or wrongful acts and, as a
result, Plaintiff is barred from recovering any damages or, in the
alternative, any such recovery should be reduced in accordance with
the doctrine of comparative negligence.
36. Plaintiff's damages, if any, were caused in whole or in
part by the acts and/ or omissions of third persons beyond the
control and responsibility of this Defendant.
4
CASE HO. CL91-8073 AA
37. Plaintiff has failed to mitigate its damages as required
by law.
COUNTERCLAIM
The Defendant, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH ("CITY"), sues
Plaintiffs, CITRUS GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ("CITRUS GLEN"), and
the AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY ("AMERICAN"), and states as follows:
1. This is an action for damages in excess of $15,000.00,
exclusive of interest, costs and attorneys' fees and further seeks
relief for the breach of a performance bond with a reduced value of
$176,741.00.
2. On or about August 2, 1988, the Boynton Beach City
commission adopted Resolution No. 88-VV which, in pertinent part,
approved final plats for subdivisions known as Executive Estates
and citrus Trail. A copy of Resolution No. 88-VV is attached
hereto as Exhibit A.
3. As a condition precedent to the approval of the Executive
Estates and citrus Trail plats, Plaintiff, CITRUS GLEN, agreed to
construct certain requiLed improvements including construction of
a portion of Miner Road together with paving, drainage, sidewalks,
swells, street lighting and off-site construction. To insure
performance of this obligation, CITRUS GLEN, as principal, and the
AMERICAN, as surety, posted a performance bond in favor of the CITY
for the total sum of $1,354,000.00. A copy of the performance bond
is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
5
CASB NO. CL91-8073 AA
4. On August 26, 1988, the CITY issued a land development
permit for the Executive Estates and citrus Trail subdivisions. A
copy of the August 26, 1988 land development permit is attached
hereto as Exhibit C.
5. pursuant to Article XI of the subdivision and platting
regulations of the CITY, all required subdivision improvements must
be completed within twenty-one (21) months from the date of
issuance of the land development permit unless a time extension is
granted by the Boynton Beach City Council. Therefore, all required
improvements, including the construction of a portion of Miner
Road, were due to be completed on or before May 26, 1990. A copy
of Article XI of the subdivision and platting regulations for the
City of Boynton Beach is attached hereto as Exhibit D.
6. On October 17, 1989, the Boynton Beach city commission
adopted Resolution No. 89-AAA which reduced the value of the above-
described performance bond to $276,741.00. A copy of Resolution
No. 89-AAA is attached hereto as Exhibit E.
7. On May 24, 1990, CITRUS GLEN requested a twelve-month
extension of time to complete the required SUbdivision improvements
including construction of a portion of Miner Road. A copy of
CITRUS GLEN's May 24, 1990 letter requesting this extension of time
is attached hereto as Exhibit F.
8. On June 5, 1900, the Boynton Beach City commission
granted CITRUS GLEN's request for a twelve-month extension of time
for the completion of the required subdivision improvements. A
6
CASB BO. CL91-8073 AA
copy of a June 6, 1990 letter from the City of Boynton Beach
advising CITRUS GLEN is attached as Exhibit G.
9. In March of 1991, CITRUS GLEN again requested an
extension of time to complete the required subdivision improvements
including construction of a portion of Miner Road. On May 21,
1991, the Boynton Beach City commission denied this request for an
additional extension of time. A copy of a May 22, 1991 letter from
the city of Boynton Beach to CITRUS GLEN advising that the request
for an additional extension of time had been denied is attached as
Exhibit H.
10. All conditions precedent to the commencement and
prosecution of this action have occurred or have been waived.
11. The Plaintiff, CITRUS GLEN, has breached the agreement it
made as a condition for the approval of the Executive Estates and
citrus Trail plats and has breached its obligations under the
above-described performance bond in that:
a. CITRUS GLEN has failed to complete the required
subdivision improvements including construction of a portion
of Miner Road together with paving, drainage, sidewalks,
swells and street lighting along the road; and
b. CITRUS GLEN has defaulted under the above-described
performance bond by failing to construct the required
improvements and by failing to pay the CITY the reduced value
of the bond ($276,741.00).
7
CASE NO. CL91-a073 AA
12. plaintiff, AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, has failed to
honor its obligations under the above-described performance bond by
either completing the required improvements on behalf of CITRUS
GLEN or paying to the Defendant, CITY, the reduced amount of the
bond ($276,741.00).
13. The Defendant, CITY, has agreed to pay the undersigned
attorneys a reasonable fee for their services in prosecuting this
action.
WHEREFORE, the Defendant, CITY, demands judgment against the
Plaintiff, CITRUS GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and the AMERICAN
INSURANCE COMPANY, in the amount of $276,741.00, together with
prejudgment interest, costs and reasonable attorneys' fees as well
as such other relief as the Court deems just and proper under the
circumstances.
REQUEST POR JURY TRIAL
The Defendant, CITY, requests a trial by jury on all issues so
triable as of right.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing
has been furnished via U.S. Mail to JAMES A. CBBROP, ESQUIRE, City
Attorney, 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310, Boynton Beach,
FL 33425-0310 and by Hand-Delivery to KAREN K. ZANN, ESQUIRE,
Balocco & Zann, Attorneys for Plaintiffs, citrus Glen Limited
8
CASB HO. CL91-8073 AA
Partnership and American Insurance Company, 1323 S.E. 3rd Avenue,
. '7r'f f 'l
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33316, th1s ~ day 0 Apr1 , 1993.
JOHNSON, ANSELMO, MURDOCH, BURKE & GEORGE
Attorneys for Defendant, Boynton Beach
790 East Broward Boulevard, Suite 400
Post Office Box 030220
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33303-0220
Telephone: 4 -0100 Fax: 463-2444
~
#91-492MTB/lt
MICHAEL T. BURKE
Florida Bar No. 338771
9
RESOLUTION NO. 88-yryt
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH,
FLORIDA, APPROVING THE FINAL PLATS FOR PLATS
OF CITRUS TRAIL, A P.U.D. AND EXECUTIVE ESTATES,
A P.U.D., IN SECTION 18, TONNSHIP 45 SOUTH,
RANGE 43 EAST
WHEREAS, performance bonds in the amount of 110% of cost
of $1,354,000.00 for Executive Estates and $488,000.00 for Citrus
Trail have been received to assure 'construction of the improvements
including the off-site construction for Lawrence Road and Miner
Road, and,
WHEREAS, all fees have been paid, including the 2% of
cost administration fee of $31,253.13 plus $2,233.00 previously
received for an Excavation and Fill permit and the recreation fee
of $129,569.33.
NOW, THEREFORE, ~E IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA:
The final plat for plats for Executive Estates and
Citrus Trail is hereby approved.
.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIsa2nd day of A"-fUs, f
,1988.
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
BY't~~~
May
Vice Mayor
~-J (C w\__
Comm1ss1on Member
--------..- ~_ J ~!\~
" .. -.::-::. \\ ) / '~.... ,
...r;-~~"-',~!\.;.'~ <:~
COmm.l.SS10n Member - ~ (
Commission Member
ATTEST:
~~.
(Corp. Seal)
~s&h\ bJ 4 A
'j
.'.1 .
j ..'
I
I".t
.
'I'
~.,
-.. :1. .
. .:t.:
r
l~
t.: .-
~
'I
I
. '
"I
~ :J
:.!
. ,'j
.,;;,jl
:;;1'
Jj\.l-i.....-.jl I ",'w;."'.; t
..JvJIlII."J11 ,J...." I ~^...,
.;1"..,...101.;1".......',. .t.
'.
l' E R P 0 R K A N. C:,.S
B 0 N.D
':
i'
. .
KNOW ALl> MEN BY THESE pRES ems I
. BELVEDERE CONSTRUCTION CO. AND
That CITRUS GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (hereina~ter called ~h.
"Principal"), ang THE AMERICAN I"SURANC~ CO~ma. a surety company
authorized to de ~uDin.aD in the State 0' Florid. (heretnafter cal104
~h. .surety"), Bre hela and firmly bound unto'tha city ot B01nton
Beach, a municipal corporation of the state of Florida (hereinBfte~ .
called the .City.). 'in the full and just sum of' f1 >354.000.00"--~--~
. lawful money of the Unite~ states of America,. to be paid to the city,
to which payment well and truly to be made we bind ourselves, our
heirs, executors, administrators, successors end assi9ns, joint1y
and severall~, firmly by.~he~e,preBents: .
WHERE~S, tho above bounded Principal, as a condition p~ec.dent
to ~~e approval by the city of a plat of D certain subdivision known
n EXECUTIVE ESTA.TES PHASE t , has submitt:ed engineering and
othe~ construction plans fo~ the Required Improvements p'rescribed by
the Subdivision and platting ~egulation8 of tbe city, pertaining to
the said subdivision. (hereafter referxed to as the .Subdivision Improve-
lI\emts Plans"), copies of .,.,b!ob plans are attached hereto Bnd by
reference made a part heteofl and
mtEREns, it w.s one' of the conditions of the;said Subdivision
and Platting Regulations.that this bond be e~ecu~ed; ,
,NOW, TlmREFORE, the conditions of tbis obligation are such that
it the above bounded principal ahall in all respects perform the
Subdivision Improve~ents Plans 'within the time specified in the Sub-
division and platting negulations of the city, and shall indemnifY
and 6ave bartllless the city againse or from all cla.ims, costs. expanses,
damages, injury or loss, including ongineering, 'legal and contingent
costs wbich the city may sustain on account'of the failure 01 the
principal to perform the Subdivision I~provements .~lans within the time
specified in the said SUbdivision and Platting Requlations, than this
obli9ation shall be void, otherwise to be and remain in'full forae and
effebt. '
'l'lIE SURE'fi UNCONDI'l'.tONlILL'l COVENANTS 1\ND AGREES 'J:Il1\'J: if the
principal fails to perfortll all or any par~ of the construction work as
sat forth in the Subdivision Improvements plans, within the time
apecified, the surety 'will fo~thwith perform'and complQte the said
construction work and pay the'cost thereof, including, but not limited
to, engineering. legel and contin9.n~ costa. and will in~emnify and '
save harmless the city BS aforesaid. Should the surety f~il or ~e~us.
to perform and completo the sai~ improvements, the city, in vie~ of the
public: interest,: health, safety and welfare factors involved and the.
inducament in approving and filiog the said' plat, ahall have the right.
to resort to any and all 18gal remedies against ttis p:incipal and the.
s~rety. Qrei~her, ~th at law and in equity, including ~pecificBlly
specific performance, to.which the Principal and Surety unconditionally
agree. I'.
. '
. .,
\ .
'. . :0'"
'"
:t'
-. ..~
:. ;
:1
. ; :~. .1::',~..'.;:.":,\..'k~.,~t..~'~.;_. :\.;t,..t..:~l..'\,.:..;...::.t.::.~\,.,.{;',::.f'.~.:..;,...:'.'.:'........:.,~.,..;.'.:',.;.,...:..,:.".,\..i..\:.,\.i..,;.::,.....' .~,:.~.:}..:~~_. .f::.:..\.;.:!::f........;.:.. :,~'.i. ,::.,:...,:{,:.:\.,..'{."r....~.. ..'~\.'.i..\ .,.,',,: /~. ,:IL' '. .{
. "g~i'bill ;";',.,: Ii .(~,: ilfr',!, .
.' ~~: . ~{~~j;~L;,{;,.
." .....~.~:>~....,..."'
';:.' .. .\::~ ~.~;~~~~:~::::~: .
I '~"'I ~,.":"'(' ) .. I
. . : '{~,~~:i~<:.. ,,:' .
" _ ". J~."'l, ~f', ll",-''''-~I 1 ""Vi.lM'1
~;'i;:'::'.;"~\' '",,':. '.'., ":.::.'::.~~IIl:'~"'" ::.:;,,'~'..,::'i:~: :";:"~'J" .iV.~,I~wlk/~'~. .r;,,:~
~ .J.n~.M....J ,.-, . ..;.......411.I"f<lb .l......'t4~'t~..l.(~..~~ ".:._,11 "'~t.~"\"~:'_ ''';'r -. l"
\i.f . ... ~. '
wv......\J.,J".........", .;J
" '. . :~:~~ .
...-_,4_:...1....~J!..~1
, ",
" ,
~ . '" .
. ."
TUB PJUNCxPl\L "ND 'l'UE, SURE'l'Y :rUIlTHER JOINTLY 1\ND SEVERALLY J\GREE
'l'llA'l' tlnll city, <It it. option, shall hi.". the right: t.o construct or,
pU~8uDnt to public advertisement and receipt of bids, cause to be
~on8truct.Cl tho .Eo~o.llIid illlpxovements in Ciil~e the pJ:'inoipal should
'fail or refuse to do 80 in accordance with the Subdivision Improvements .
1>lan. und'within the tirae'8pec~t'ied, and,!n the event: the city should
~xexciBo and give effact to such right, the principal and the Surety
'shall be jointl,y and l1everally liable hereunder to reimburse the city
the total cost thereof, including, but not limited to, engineering,
legal und contingent costs" together with any damages, either direct
or eonssquentiBl, which lI\ay be sustainllld, on aocount of the tailure of,
the Principal' to carry out Ilnd parform the Subdivid,on Improvements
Plans within the time :specified.
i
! ,
t . ".
. .
..
Iij WITNESS mlEREOP, ~he principal and the surety have eX8~uted
these presents this ..!!!: dillY. of July . 19B8.
, "
5440 Summit B1vd,
West Palm Beach, 'FL
..
Address:
P. 0'. Box 15107
Wes~ Palm Beac~1 FL 33416
Address :-
BY: F.G.J.' De~elop~ent Corp
W!.'ttrtifutiisy"ados, J'r. :
-~~.
~/~~n
"
I.
.'
\.
, ,
, THE AME~ICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
. SURmt .'
.'
.. :. t.
. ~y~ ~'t~~:it~
. power of AttPrney.tp
:. . .be ettachedl' ' . :
...~ar~ar~t, M. r:innegan~ At~o~neY1anc-t
,.
i
, ,
~d~re881 SURETY
777 San Marin Ddve
, Nova to. CA 94998
Address: AGENT
501 So. -Flagler Dr:
.
. . .
",.: .. ."
" ..
. \"
. , . '. .
," .'._ ,0..
"
~
..:,~.~~..
~'1'TEST ~ ~ .' . ,;: ." '
. ....:.. License "Resident Agent ~:.
. . .0, ..... .
.'.
'.
,\
. .
· L
West P~'m Beach. Fl 33401 .
. witn~uiseB.I,
"
.
i.
I
-. \
. .
'.
.,' . of
: ,.-
... I'
"
, "
..
'. . '.
:. :'}!.: .
,.' <. ::,'~'/~:'I .
0" f'"
I,YI, '. ."
.eO :-..
..
I,,'
'.
- ~ ....... .
"
:. ,
". "
~ .
.. :1.: ..
. .', ~~;
,..
SENT BY:
:10-24-91
9: OOAM
Boynton -, fax""
3054632444:# 4
. .-r
/"' ~ .
/-, iCDiEJW.
,.j~ ' ' THE AMERICAN JNSURANCE COMPANY
I KNOW AU. lBN n"J'IIED PUDN'J'Sc 1bt ~ AMUICAN INSURANCE COMPANY. a Qx1Ionlioft duly arpaizecl .lId tlUstint Illlder the
lawalol the S~ 01 New Jcfwy. and ~ Ita prlndpal oIIce in 1M C'J1)" ad Coury of !aD Pranciu:o. CalltDnlla, bas 1II1cle. COfl&tlll1loc:1 and
~lIIed. IIIIl 401J1 by tMM prtMftll maD. COIIllIMe &nd appoint . .
: ! RICHARD S. JOlfiSON ROBERT C. DIJl4lIOND. SI1M L. ELLINGTON. MARGARET M. FINNEGAN.
, : F 'MALCOLM ~CAMPBELL and CON1HARTHOORN
: EST P LM CHI ~ in 1 r several
jH tfIJ, amwtJLY(I~f~. wf1Jl fuD powa- au~~ty ~reby ~errtd~ ill name. ~ amf.J'ud, 19iKl:Utc. 101, a,k~ am
deliver lilY ud all bood.. allderukinp. ~ Otr other written obI/ptlonsln tJle nalUre tMreet; fOr a~ obl:lleu '
,~clud1n. &DY and all eo~ent. required by the ne9&rtmeut of rrauaport.tioG, Stat. of
:11~rida, tDcideQt to the r.l.... of retained p.rc~t.sea and/or final ..t1mat......---.--.
i IllclllD bind the Corponlltcm thereby.. fully hd to tbe same e.hlftllS if ..e1. bond. were 1i&M'd by tile PresidClt. sealed with lla. Clorporlte seal of the
I C~ 11td duly annled by II' ~mary. hem)" mltylna IUKl ;oonll.11II alllJIat dte said Altomey(sHn.fKt my do in the premises.
! T1d. ~r of Inoruey is arantH puttUlJIl to Anide VtJI. Section JO and 31 of By.taws at 11iE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY noll.' in. full
, For"41 IUld t<<lct.
! t. "",ell VlU, A",..I1II.., uti A"lblNity Aab&ut ~, uti Altom,.it.htt ail Apetl to .." u,Il 1'rOCM ud M,I..APl*1UOII.
: s.Cuo. JO. AppodtlflM', n. Cbinltu 01 dlt IoanI of Dtneton, 1ft PndlItIlc, ..., ~t or .," 011:111 .... authorized 'e, the Joard 01
. DInliton. UN CWIIIuIlI of tll. loud of DInctoI'l, tIl. Pruidct or U, YlctoPrllldllll, ..f. ftCIJII tIIIIl to Umt. appolnt IKldItIl AubllDt Seactlrlls
*" AlIOfD.,.....Pact 10 ttpl'ft4A1 uG ac& lor aIIII OD Wldt of the Ccrpora&lca DIll ApCl co lc=pt IcpI pnxas IIId ...b appUratlctl ror Il\lII oa
: ~ 01 dM CMpaIa.... I
; Sttdol JI. A.IA<<II7. na. AlIdMJrity of lIIeIt lnicletat AaallWlt StcrtwMI. Alton"",'''t, ... AInu sU1I .. .. pmoftkd lit tll. lNIRQm
. ~b11 their appoialJaal, ami UIJ IUdlI~lDlDleBt ud an autllorilJ puled then", .., be revvled a' 1D1 time br die Board of Diftwln tJI b,
, Ut p.,soa fDJlOWWtd 10 .... ACtl a,po.b!tmetn. ..
nil ;powrr of attorney. ia .ianed Ind scaJc4 II.... and by tbe authority at lbe lollowflll ResoJudon I40pttd by tbe Board of Dlrmars of mE
AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY IS I mettiJtI dulY ~Ied and held on the 2ItJl day 01 Stpllmber, I~. allCl sald ItctOlutlon liB nor been
~.r~l .
"~L.VED. IhaI dtt sianat"~ 01 aft)' Vll;c.Praidfftl, A.1i..nt ScQ'Ctuy, anll Raiclnt AMitcant Scm9ry of this COqIOra,iQr!, IUld the IflIl ~f Ihis
~ioIIl!laY be lII1lxeCi at priDted oa ..y power of altOfRy. '0. allY revOCItion of any power of Ittome)'. or Oft I1lY ~tniftc~t rlllll!n11llemo. by
FacuMile. MId uy pow<< of Utoruy. -Yo revGCal10ll of Ifty power oi atlomey. Oft cenibc barllll suclt 'aalmi~ .ipa'un! CIl' f~imile seal ~I be
..&lid: and blndilll UPOO IIllt CorponllGQ. . -
IN WI'mESS WHEREOF. THE AJdERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY hIS caused Ihnc prtsents 10 be slpd b)' itl V,".Prnidcnl.
I2ld U'l:OI'J)OIatcscallO be: IIcmUIO aNmd thb 12 t n ~ of J InU ary It.!L .
~i:~N'U~~~
Vk::a-~
By
nATE OrCALaromGA.
}~
COtlN'l'Y or 1!WUN
; CDt~b 12th day 01 , January . 19 ~. beforemrptT1caa!JyealM Richard Will hms .
; to _ known, -bo, NIl, by 1Il1 cIuJy 1WOnl. did dtpow and sar. ,hat hi i& Vic..Presldtlll 01 nlE AMEIlICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, the Cor-
; ~f&iion dt$crlbcd In IP4 whlell ~aI the I!toYr wnmcnti that ht kllOWI lbc _I of aid Cof1lorIllon~ th.. th( _ arrbc~ \0 Iht Miel ill$ulImem
: J& yell ~w.laIJ; tltlllt ....10 .ftiud by order ot tht Board or Dlrec10n 01 &aid Corporalfon anc11bl' '" stilled Ilk ftamf thtrtto by IIkt ordtr.
1N WITNESS WHEREOP, I bYe bcR1l1ll0 let. as,. hud IInd .mud my oftkial.cal. the day and year hncin tltsl abovt wollen.
@'OFFlCl4LtIAL
SUSIE r. aI8t
..., MUC-~
...... ......
I IIr ~llld. ....... T~
~--.. -~~
Hca')"-NIc
i :
I
i
;
I
CDTlf1CAft
.
j , IITAD 01' I'I.01llM }
!(:I~ OP TAMPA, IILLSBOltOOGB C01J1I'1'!' ~ .
i I tJe unda1llaocd. laldCDt AIaI.un. 5cclrtta,., ot THI! AMEJUCAN INSUItANC:!! COMI"ANY, . NEW JI!RSEY Corporallon, DO ,HEREBYe'ER.
, ~ rllat tile f~lll' and allKhrd POWEll Of ATTORNEY remains I. ,,,II fQra! nd hu nOl been revalwl: and furthermore tha. Articl, VIIl.~.
; ~ I jO alMI S i ot Itle )j.I.., 01 dI.CorponrluD. and tlu: iaoiurioll ar lhe Baud or D{rm~. set fonh In the P_cr ot AUamry. art ROW In force.
4aadsealedaltheC~ of 'fDlpll, H~ll1bo~OUlh CCmltJ,Date.s tba 21st d.,. of July . 19 ~ .
I,
.
; !
:, "".TA.U1
I' I
~
~
120 N.E. 2nd AVENUE
P.O. BOX 310
BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIOA ~10
1305 )7J.C~ 11 I
':,_,."'..:..,(.J \. '_..
CITY of
BOYNTON BE~CH
..:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER
August 26, 1988
Mr. Ric Rossi, P.E.
ROSSI & MAL~VASI ENGINEERS
Forum III, Suite 40r
.1675 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd.
West Palm Beach, FI 33401
Re: Executive Estates & Citrus Trails - Land Development Permit
Dear Mr. Rossi:
We received the recorded plats of Executive Estates and Citrus
Trails this date.
This letter constitutes your Land Development Permit.
Completion of improvements is required within 21 months.
Very truly yours,
/ .
_,;;k;:N5l~
Thomas A. Clark, P.E.
City Engineer .
TAC/ck
~ '
S)th;b) ~ ~
APPENDIX C-SUBDIVISIONS. PLATTING Art. XI, S 2
Section 19. Commercial and industrial subdivisions.
Commercial and industrial subdivisions shall comply with
all of the requirements of this ordinance, except that all
local streets shall be designed according to the collector
street typical section contained in the current city stand-
ards.
ARTICLE XI. CONSTRUCTION OF
REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS
Section 1. Construction methods.
Construction methods shall be those prescribed in the
current "Department of Transportation Standard Specifica-
tions for Road and Bridge Construction."
Section 2. Administration of construction.
After approval of the final plat and supplementary
material, a developer may construct the required improve-
ments subject to obtaining all required permits. The city
engineer shall be notified in advance of the date of
commencement of such construction. Construction shall be
performed under the surveillance of, and shall at all times
be subject to review by the city engineer; however, this in no
way shall relieve the developer and his engineer of the
responsibility for close field coordination and final compli-
ance with the approved plans, specifications and the
requirements of this ordinance. The developer shall employ
a Florida-registered engineer for complete administration of
the construction of the required improvements. The de-
veloper shall require progress reports and final certification
of the construction of the required improvements from such
engineer be filed with the city engineer. The city engineer or
his duly authorized representative shall have the right to
enter upon the property for the purpose of reviewing the
construction of required improvements during the progress
of such construction. The developer's engineer shall submit
construction progress reports, at points of progress
prescribed by the city engineer. The developer's engineer
2147
SJ/.hi hi ~ 0
Art. XI, ~ 2
BOYNTON BEACH CODE
shall coordinate joint reviews of the construction with the
city engineer. The city engineer shall have the authority to
stop work upon failure of the developer or his engineer or
coordinate the construction of the required improvements as
prescribed by this ordinance.
Section 3. Measurements and tests.
During construction, the developer's engineer shall make
such measurements, field tests and laboratory tests or cause
them to be made to certify that the work and materials
conform with the approved development plans and the
provisions of this ordinance. The city engineer may require,
at his discretion, tests and measurements which he deems
necessary.
Section 4. Completion certificate.
The required improvements shall not be considered
complete until a completion certificate along with the final
project records have been furnished to. reviewed and
approved by the city engineer. The certificate shall be by the
developer's engineer stating that the required improvements
were installed under his responsible direction and that the
improvements conform with the approved construction plans
and this ordinance. The developer's engineer shall also
furnish a copy of each of the construction plans on a high
quality, time stable reproducible material acceptable to the
city engineer, showing the original design in comparison to
the actual finished work and a copy of the measurements,
tests and reports made on the work and material during the
progress of the construction.
Section 5. Time extensions.
All required improvements shall be completed within
twentv-one (21) months from the date of issuance of the
land development permit. Time extensions may be e-ranted
by the city council upon the recommendation of the city
engineer. The developer shall present a written request for
extension to the office of the city engineer. Each time
extension shall not exceed one year.
2148
.,
et..(,.t~, l:
RESOLlJI'IOO No). 89- 1\(>.. i\
A RESOLlJI'ION OF '!HE CIT'{ OF B:>Y!'rrON BEACH,
FLORIDA, REDUCIN3 1HE AMJUNT OF 'I'HE PERFORMANCE
8CND FOR EXB:LJrIVE ~rATES, A P.U.D. IN SEX:'TlOO
18, TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST
and,
in the am:luot of $1,354,000.00 was f:osted for the construction of improvements,
WHEREAS, a perforrrance bond by The AA"erlcan Insurance Ccxnpany
including sidewalks and swales, strE~t lighting and the off-site construction
~, all work is ccrnpleted except paving and drainage,
for Lawrence Road and Miner Road.
CIT'{ OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA:
NCW. 'lliEREFORE, BE IT RE.SOLVED BY TIlE CITY ca.MISSIOO OF TIlE
uncompleted work plus 10%, am:lunting to $276,741.00.
The am:lunt of the oond t:e reduced to the value of the
ATI'EST:
rL .
PASSED AND AIXlPI'ED 'IHIs--L.Z.=.day of C<!::fo hcoY'
,
,1989.
/"
CITY OF BO ~.~' RIDA
~
,./ c;,.;.- -7-'
" ?" I L- --
" . L
/' a-f.~" ..
/ ' Mayor
l-- ~ ~
/ LC. /(:.) ;~
d;~P0
Comnission r-leIrber "
. / it '
. V ~. " .
~( L i~_ ' /14'wG_
. ~ssion Merrber'
tJ~/'lZff",,":-
CityCle
(Corp. Seal)
S:~l br ~ i=
~
I
,
May 24, 1990
OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER
City of Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Attention: Mr. Vincent A. Finizio
Acting Assistant to the City Engineer
Res Construction of Miner Road; Your letter of April 25, 1990
Dear Mr. Finizio,
P-lease consider this letter 'our formal request for a 12 month extension of
surety for the uncompleted portion of work in the Plats of Executive Estates and
Citrus Trails, which includes the construction of our portion of Miner Road.
As you are aware, the section of Miner Road between our property and Chalet IV
has ~ot been constructed yet. This section of Miner Road i~ the responsibility
of another developer, and was scheduled to he completed by December 1988, ahead of
Our section of road which would connect Lawrence Road with Congress Avenue.
Since this missing section of Miner Road has not been constructed yet, it would
not benefit our residents nor the surrounding residents to construct our portion at
this time since we would be creating a dead end street. This dead end would c~eate
security problems for our residents.
On May 24, 1990, we met with John Guidry, Director of Utilities and he has no
objection to a 12 month extension. Thank You very much for your cooperation in this
matter.
/
Sincerely,
Felix Granados,~r.
Citrus Glen /
cc., J. Scott Miller, City Manager
John Guidry, Director of Utilities
CITRUS GLEN UMlTED PARTNERSHIP
8300 LAWRENCE ROAD, ~~,Bb~~ Fl~A 3.1436 ITL.: (407) 734-9830
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
~. Mailing:
~ Telephone:
. /
/-
../
f , :
Post Office Box 310
Boynton Beach. Fl 33425-0310
(407) 738-7487
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach. Fl 33435
OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGI~~ER
~r. Felix ~r~nados, Jr.
Cit~us Gler. Limited Partnersh:p
8300 Lawrence ~oad
Eoynton Beach, Florida 33436
JU:le ~, 1990
Re; Twelv: (12) Month Time ~xtenslon
Miner Road and Requi=ec Subdivision Iffiprovements
Executive Estates and Citrus T~ail Pla~(s)
Dear Mr. Granados:
Please be advised that du~ing the F:gular City C0ii1r.;:'-3Ei0n
Ine.::'Cing of ':une :, 1990 the City COIT,missic,n granted YOll a twelve
(12) month time extensicn for the completion of the required
improvements, relative to the City of Boynton Beach, Subdivision
and Platting Regula~ions which goverDs the development of the above
referenced plats.
Attached for your review and files is a copy of the back-up
data submitted to the City Commission by this depa~tment. All of
the reqUired subdivision improvements fer the afore~entioned plats
shall be completed wi thin this tiJle extension interval which
expires on June Sf 1391. The construction of Hiner Road must
begin prior to the expiration date of this extension and your
otganizaticn is expected to proceed through final completion and
City acceptance of said improvements, in a timely fashion.
The Engineering DepartJlent for the City of Boynton Beach is
pleased to have been of assistance to you in this r.;atter.
Very truly yours,
zio
Ass is 'Can t t, the Cl t y E:1gi:1eer
- -.
-'-.
7irnotllY Ca:1~=n, Directcl- o~ ?:~~n::l;
J. Scc~t Mi2ler, Cit~ Mcna;er
~JLhi bt ~ C,
'I'fte City of
~oynton 13eacfi
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beadi 'Bou[wara
P.O. 'BoJ(310
'BoY1lt01l 'Bead!., 1(oritfa 33435-0310
City:J{aff: (40i) i 34 -8111
:JJtX: (40i) i38.i459
OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER
May 22. 1991
Mr. Felix Granados. Jr.
Citrus Glen Limited Partnership
8300 Lawrence Road
Boynton Beach, Florida 33436
R~: Construction of Miner Road
~our Request for a One-Year Time Extension
Dear Mr. Granados:
Please be advised that the City Commission. during their regular May 21. 1991
meeting. denied your request for a one year time extension for the construction
of Miner Road as depicted within City approved plans.
Should you require any additional information. please contact me at (407) 738-7487.
Very truly yours.
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA
J:....;., ,-l.,c, ~+-
Vincent A. Finizio ~
Administrative Coordinator of Engineering
VAF/ck
cc: J. Scott Miller. City Manager
W. Richard Staudinger, P.E., Gee & Jenson Consulting Engineers
Charles Walker. Jr., Director of P.B.C. Traffic Engineering
Enrico Rossi. P.E.. Rossi & Malavasi Engineers. Inc.
S1Lhi OJ ~ H
5lmen'ca's (70(1'-"
': ~ "II ((<{ ream
,~ ,
; \ 'J
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
OFFICE OF THB CITY MANAGER
Date
3/24/92
Arline Weiner, Mayor
Edward Harmening, Vice Mayor
Jose Aguila, Commissioner
Lynne Matson, Commissioner
Lillian Artis, Commissioner
AS REQUESTED
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
xxxx
REMARKS: Citrus Glen Limited partnership vs. City of Boynton Beach
Attached hereto please find a copy of a letter dated March 19, 1992 from
Michael T. Burke, Attorney representing Boynton Beach in this case, pro-
viding to the City an update on the recent hearing before Judge Rodgers, as
well as a proposal from Citrus Glen's principal to resolve this matter
without further and extensive litigation. Jim Cherof, City Attorney,
through separate letter to plaintiff's attorney, has requested that said
proposal be reduced in writing.
This subject matter will be placed before the City Commission at the next
regular business meeting in order to provide an update, as well as to
receive any appropriate direction. In the interim should you have any
questions relative to this case, please feel free to contact Jim Cherof or
myself.
Jj2~
City Manager
RECEIVED
JSM:cd
cc: Carrie parker, Assistant City Manager
Jim Cherof, City Attorney
Chris cutro, Planning Director
Mike Kazunas, City Engineer
Central File
Attachment
_24
PLANNING DEPT.
'-"
..""
LAW OFFICES
JOHNSON, ANSELMO, MURDOCH, BURKE & GEORGE
A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
RONALD P. ANSELMO
N. RIVES BALCOM
MICHAEL T, BURKE
BURLF.GEORGE
E. BRUCE JOHNSON
RICHARD H. MoDUFF
ROBERT E- MURDOCH
MICHAEL R. PIPER
JOHN P. SEILER
SUITE 400
710 EAST BROWARD BOULEVARD
POIlT LAUDEIlDALE. FLOIlIDA 33301
MAILING ADDRESS:
POST OFFICE SOX 030220
FORT LAUDUlDALE. FLORIDA 33303.0220
TELECOPIER 13061483-2444
TELEPHONE: 13061 483-0100 -Browa<d
13061 146-2000 . D.d.
March 19, 1992
James A. Cherof, Esquire
City Attorney - Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
Re: citrus Glen Limited Partnership vs.
city of Boynton Beach
Our File Number 91-492 KTB
Dear Jim:
On Tuesday, March 17, 1992, I attended the hearing on the
Defendant, City of Boynton Beach I s Motion to Dismiss Amended
Complaint in the above-referenced matter. Through extensive
arguments Circuit Judge Rodgers denied the motion and granted the
sureties motion to intervene in the case. Copies of the Courtls
Orders are enclosed for your file.
I will proceed to prepare an answer and defenses to the
Amended Complaint on behalf of the City of Boynton Beach. I would
also like to file a counter claim for breach of contract and of the
default of the bond against citrus Glen and the surety. Please
advise if I am authorized to do so.
Finally, it should be noted that the defense and prosecution
of this lawsuit would be complicated by the fact that the case has
been assigned to Judge Rodgers. Frankly, I was astounded by many
of the things that Judge Rodgers said during the March 17, 1992,
hearing. It is clear that Judge Rodgers does not have a good
understanding of municipal law or land development in general. It
would be difficult to predict his future actions.
RECEIVED
MAR 20 1992
CITY ~/l A,NAGER'S L
-
_._~
James A. Cherof, Esquire
March 19, 1992
Page 2
Following the hearing, citrus Glen's principal, Felix
Granados, Jr., indicated a desire to resolve the matter without
extensive litigation. It appears that citrus Glen would be willing
to advance the funds necessary to construct the middle portion of
Miner Road to the extent the existing bond is inadequate to cover
costs. Granados indicated that he would lend the city the money
secured by a lien on the Glick property. In addition, Citrus Glen
would complete the portion of Miner's Road that it is required to
construct. In the event there is any interest in attempting to
resolve this litigation, construct the road and then proceed with
litigation against the Glick Company, please advise.
Please do not hesitate to let me know if you have any
questions, comments or instructions concernlng the above,
enclosures contained herein or the status of the case in general.
I will continue to keep you advised and the City Manager of all
further developments.
Very truly yours,
MICHAEL T. BURKE
For the Firm
MTB/bp
Enclosures
cc: Mr. J. Scott Miller/w. encl.
City Manager/Boynton Beach
JOHNSON, ASSELMO, MURDOCH, BURKE & GEORGE, P.A.
..,
...,
CITRUS GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
a Florida limited partnership,
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND
FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NO. CL91-8073 AA
Plaintiff,
JUDGE: EDnRD ROGERS
vs.
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH,
a municipal corporation,
Defendant.
/
ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO D!SMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT
THIS CAUSE having come on to be heard on Defendant, CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH's, Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint, and the Court
having heard argument of counsel, and being otherwise advised in
the Premises, it is hereupon
o~ AND AD~GED that said Motion be, and the same is
hereby ~
~ PA-<fl' BOf
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, at Po.. L Lauderd~le,
PAL^"- ~-
~ vwar~
County, Florida, this day of February, 1992.
SIGNED AND DATED
cnrJr~T1 ~
copies furnished: JUOGE ::~W.A~O RODGE~
JaCBAEL 'r. BURD, ESQUIRE, Johnson, Anselmo, et aI, '.ntorneys for
Defendant, P.O. Box 030220, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33303-0220
JAKES A. CHDOP, ESQUIRE, City Attorney, 100 E. Boynton Beach
Blvd., P.O. Box 310, Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
KAREN M. ZANN, ESQUIRE, Balocco & Zann, Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Intervenor, 1323 S.E. 3rd Avenue, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33316
1
(..... \ ,
\... 1;'4 IJ ~
r
l\-r'
1..--; .
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT. IN AND FOR
COUNTY. FLORIDA
Case No.: CL q I - go 1~ -AA
p~ i d\ 6.J.i:'~
~~ '
/"
.J
" '--
ORDER
~ (\ "
THIS CAUSE having come on to be heard on E)ert::lldC:lIII'::>1P1C1;lItiff'~ ' 'V h nv../'^..O......I,,\_ <:::."~ \.. ~~'v .r.:.L- '
, r;~--'J ) '..A d\ ','j _' <,'
"-" -- \ ~
I
-....-
____ < . \1 \ "'- 2. . \ "....i(
- ""
Motion
and the Court having heard argument of counsel. and being otherwise advised
in the Premises, it is hereupon,
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that saId Motion be, and the same is hereby
Co LV. \t 1);
DONE AND ORDERED in Cham~er~ at (}. I
Ih;L_YTfl'"1 day ot II O)....~ .~:;'9 -f dJ!
. ~
/.-~
}/ //;1AA" A f/ OCE EOW.ARD 9j1D~qS
", " /~ ( .~"
"..____> - --CirCntrJudge / '--
E&Aft{) DATED
AR '7 "19.2
Copies furnIshed:
TO: Vincent Finiz /Tim
GER'S OFFICE
BOYN'l'ON BEACH
DATE
5/8/90
DEPARTMENT En ineer
FOR YOUR FILES
~
o
o
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
OTHER
D
D
D
APPROPRIATE ACTION
EVALUATION/RECOMMENDATION
NOTE AND RETURN
ACTION DESIRED PRIOR TO
SUBJECT: Joint Entrance Road for Elementary School Site "P" & Citrus Park
Attached hereto please find copies of a letter from Roger Saberson, along
with copies of the warranty Deeds on the above referenced projects. I
would ask that you please review these documents for consistency with any
and all previous agreements between the City and the developer. Your
prompt attention on this matter is appreciated. Thank you.
I tentatively scheduled these two items for the City Commission meeting of
May 15, 1990.
~ <t.rtf~
J. cott Miller, City Manager
JSM:cd
Attachments
RESPONSE:
~.
RECEIVED
... 9 ~~b"
PlANNU~G DEPT~
Date (Action Completed) ~~- J~ 111
Signature~~~~
~
w
.\
M E M 0 RAN DUM
May 3, 1990
NO:
90-031
TO:
J. Scott Miller, City Manager
FROM:
Jim Cherof, City Attorney
RE:
Joint Entrance Road for Elementary School Site "P"
and Citrus Park
Herewith I enclose a copy of a letter from Roger Saberson,
together with copies of the Warranty Deeds (I have the
originals). Would you please forward copies of these documents
to the appropriate staff, to see that they are reviewed for
consistency with the previous agreement between the City and the
developer.
Also, this matter should
next City Commission meeting,
the
JAC/ras
RE"DrY"";)'"~ -"""D
,.'"""l. .,~-4'''' ,
:' ,,' ,'.1 ,.'. I : ~
'.J --'-" -.... I .kJ:-
MAY 7 1990
CITY r~MNAr:":"\" '
.:-FleE
, ,
LAW OFFICES OF
ROGER G. SABERSON, P.A.
DELRA Y EXEClITlVE MALL
110 EAST ATLANTIC AVENUE
DELRA Y BEACH. FLORIDA 33444
(305) 272-8616
May 2, 1990
Mr. Jim Cherof
City Attorney
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435
RE: JOINT ENTRANCE ROAD FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE liP"
AND CITRUS PARK
Dear Jim:
~-...,..
...
As you are probably aware, the City of Boynton Beach requested
some time ago that the School Board and citrus Park (Boynton
Nurseries) work out a shared entranceway which would serve the
north portion of Elementary School site "P" and the Citrus Park
development. The School Board and citrus Park entered into an
agreement to create this shared entrance roadway and pursuant to
the agreement, each party agreed to convey certain lands to the
City. The entrance roadway is approximately 350 feet long by 80
feet wide.
r herewith enclose the following original deeds:
1. Warranty Deed from The School Board of Palm Beach county
to the City of Boynton Beach, dated April 2, 1990. This Deed
conveys a tapered parcel which is reflected on the survey attached
to the Deed. The City should have already received from the School
Board a Right of Way Deed dated September 20, 1989 which conveys
the bulk of the portion of the roadway that is derived from
the School Board property. If this Deed has already been
recorded I would appreciate you furnishing me a recorded copy of
this Deed. If it has not been recorded, please make arrangements
to record it simultaneously with the enclosed Warranty Deed.
2. Warranty Deed dated May 1, 1990 from Boynton Nurseries,
a Florida General Partnership to the city of Boynton Beach. This
conveys the bulk of the roadway that is derived from the Boynton
Nurseries property i.e., an area of approximately 350 feet long and
60 feet wide. This conveyance completes the necessary transfers
~
~
Mr. Jim Cherof
May 2, 1990
Page Two
to the ci ty for the shared entrance roadway. I would also
appreciate it if you would record this Deed and furnish me a
recorded copy thereof.
Thank you for your cooperation in this regard.
Sincerely yours,
/~/~C~
ROGER G. SABERSON
RGS/drt
Enclosures
~:..-
...
cc: Mr; James D. Sturrock, Jr.
Mr. Enrico Rossi
Mr. Jay Taplin
548/107
083089
Ingress Parcel
Prepared by and Returned to:
Drennen L. Whitmire, Jr., Esq.
Gunster, Yoakley, Criser & Stewart, P.A.
Phillips Point, Suite 500
777 South Flagler Drive
West Palm Beach, Florida 33402-4587
WARRANTY DEED
THIS WARRANTY DEED made and executed the 1st day
of May, 1990 ,xd~MK by
BOYNTON NURSERIES, a Florida general partnership,
hereinafter called the Grantor, to:
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
whose post office address is 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd..
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435
hereinafter called the Grantee:
(Wherever used herein the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee"
include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs,
legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the
successors and assigns of corporations.)
WITNESSETH: That the Grantor, for and in consideration of
the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable
considerations, receipt and sufficiency whereof is hereby
acknowledged, by these presents does grant, bargain, sell,
alien, remise, release, convey and confirm unto the Grantee, all
that .certain land situate in Palm Beach County, Florida, to wit:
SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE
INCORPORATED HEREIN. ***
Subject to taxes for the year 1989 and subsequent years; all
easements, restrictions, reservations, dedications, limitations
and rights-of-way of record; restrictions, limitations and
conditions imposed by governmental authority, all applicable
environmental and land-use regulations; and all matters which
would be disclosed by an accurate survey of the land.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever.
AND the Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said
land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all
persons whomsoever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Grantor has executed these presents
on the day and year first above written.
signed, Sealed and Delivered:
in the Presence f:
BOYNTON NURSERIES, a Florida
general partnership 'I
- /'
By: \ )ttL(~7--)' -Zt,"2-Lt")('){';
// /James D. Sturrock, Jr'~,
( / Managing Partner
***THIS CONVEYANCE IS EXPRESSLY MADE SUBJECT TO THE EASEMENTS FOR INGRESS
AND EGRESS AND ROAD RIGHT OF HAY PURPOSES SET FORTH ON PAGE 2 HEREOF.
~
-
Page 2 of Warranty Deed
Boynton Nurseries to
City of Boynton Beach
state of Florida
County of Palm Beach
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1st
day of May 1990 by James D. sturrock, Jr. as Managing Partner of
Boynton Nurseries, a Florida general partnership on behalf of the
partnership. ~ 11
my .. . I~ is ~"""',Il,/.d ck___-
comwotafv~?rc~SI~~~~rTcrfi ~
Notary Publl.c
My Commission Expires Feb. 25. Jm
i!>!!d~q Lhl~ l!!!)( l!la ~ 1IliI._......
The conveyance of the land described in Exhibit A, is subject to
the following easements for ingress and egress and road right of
way purposes:
1. Grantor reserves a non exclusive easement in perpetuity for
ingress and egress over and across the land described in Exhibit
A for the use and benefit of and appurtenant to Grantor's Land
(hereinafter described) and for the use and benefit of and
appurtenant to any parcels or lots that are created from the
subdivision or resubdivision of Grantorls Land. Grantor's Land is
described as follows:
The Northwest quarter (NWl/4) of the Southwest quarter (SW
1/4) of the Northwest quarter (NW 1/4); and the Northest quarter
(NE 1/4) of the Southwest quarter (SW 1/4) of the Northwest quarter
(NW 1/4); and the Northwest quarter (NW 1/4) of the Southeast
quarter (SE 1/4) of the Northwest quarter (NW 1/4) of section
Eighteen (18), Township forty five (45) South, Range Forty three
(43) East, Palm Beach County, Florida, LESS AND EXCEPT the land
described in Exhibit A.
2. Grantor for $1.00 and other good and valuable consideration the
receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby
grants, bargains, sells, conveys and confirms to the School Board
of Palm Beach ~ounty, Florida a non exclusive easement in
perpetuity for l.ngress and egress over and across the land
described in Exhibit A for the use and benefit of and appurtenant
to the land owned by the School Board of Palm Beach County
(hereinafter described) and for the use and benefit of and
appurtenant to any parcels or lots that are created from the
subdivision or resubdivision of the School Board Land. The School
Boardls Land is described as follows:
The South one-half (1/2) of the Southwest quarter (SW 1/4) of
the Northwest quarter (NW 1/4) of section eighteen (18), Township
forty five (45) South, Range forty three (43) East, Palm Beach
County, Florida.
3. The Grantor for $1.00 and other good and valuable consideration
the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby
grants, bargains, sells, dedicates, conveys and confirms to the
public a non exclusive easement, in perpetuity, to use the land
described in Exhibit A for road right of way purposes.
.
.
..
---tIs--
13fT Ie
~
<C
o
\.l
\U
U
'Z
U,.)
bl
::
4(
-i I
r:~,.. 6dJ ~ 5C,HOOI.
&..AWIlS c,6 n. V
NOltTM L.llfe of 1"Ke ~-'t- OF
'SwY.t or NW-'.. or:: ~e,:not4 19~
j61'~7'41'W __ \
i
!
I'
I
"}IO.7'1'
srre \\ P II
l.AWfr:.U..e ~OAD t THe' W~~i L.INe OF JlW ~
OF 51::C.,.'0.... l& J iWi' -ts S J ~u~ '4~e
N
~i\d
w <:::::.::. ~ E
p'V~
5
EXHIBIT \\~
,.
DESCRIPTION:
^ PARCEL OF LAND FOR IUGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES. LYING IN SECTION 18. TOWNSHIP 4S SOUTH, UNGE
43 EAST, COUNTY OF Phut BE1\C1I, STATe OF FLORIDh, AND HORE PJ\RTICUI..\RLY DESCRIBED AS rOLLC\iS
THE SOUTH 60.00 FEET OF THE WEST 350.00 FEET OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF (Ni, oS" THE SOl'TIt O~E-
HALF (st) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-OCARTER (NW!) OF SECTION.-l8, TOWNSHIP 4S SOUTH, Ul':GE: ':J
EAST, COUNTY OF PAtH BEACH, FLORI DA.
. SUBJECT TO A PUBLIC RIGHT-Or-WAY FOR LAWRENCE ROAD.
CONTAINING 0.4834 ACRE, MORE OR LESS.
Raturn to: (anclose self-addrassed stamped envalope)
Il'_
. Agustin A. Hernandez~
W^RRANlY DEED
'FROM CORPORAl,.....,
RAMCO "'O~M :s
Addr_:
3930 RCA Boulevard
Suite 3004
Palm Beach Gardens. Florida 33410
..
This Instrument Prepered by:
Agustin A. Hernandez
Addr_: 3930 RCA Boulevard
Suite 3004
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
i
~
!
I
J
Property Appraisers Parcel Identification (Folio) Number(s):
Grantee(s) 8.8.#(s):
SPA~ ABOVE THIS LINE fOR PROCESSING DATA
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE fOA RECOADlNO DA fA
This 'Warranty llleed 1\1n</p and PJ(pcll/pd Ifl(' 2nd day of April
THE SCHOOL BOARD OF PAU1 BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, a corporate
pursuant to the Constitution of the State of Florida
a corporalion C'J(i.~ling IInder Ifl(' laws of Florida . and llOping its Ilrillcipa( place of
lHlsinl'SS at 3930 RCA Boulevard, Suite 3004, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
hereinaflC'r calledtfle granlor, to THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, a political subdivision
of the State of Florida
A D. Ic)90
body poli tic
by
wllOs(, postofficp address is
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd., Boynton Beach, FL 33435
hf'rC'inafler culled t/lf' grantee:
ltfitnrssrfh: Tfl(}l If Ie wall tor, for and in consid('ralion of Ifl(' slim of $ 10.00
palllahle cOllsidpratiolls. recpipt IlIhC'F'('of is fl<'rel,y acknowlC'dgC'd. hy thpse presents does granl,
alipn. r('mise. r('lease, cOlwey allll confirm IIl1to 1/1f~ gran/ee. all Ihal cerlain land situate in
COllllt~', Florida, Piz:
(\\'hrrf'\'f"r UlOf"d hf'ff'in Iht' tf"rmll "I{rantor" and H,l{ranflt-e" indullf' all the partif"~ to .hi! in'itrumr-nt and
the hf"in, Irl{al rt'pre~ntati""f'5 and a'!lii~n! or indi,"iduals. and the successors and a!li5igns or corporatiom)
and otfler
hargain, sell,
SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND SURVEY ATTACHED
HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A" AND BY THIS REFERENCE
INCORPORATED HEREIN.
Jogdher
wise apperlaining.
ID )taue and tD
witll all the tenements. Ilereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in any-
)told, the same in fee simple forel1er.
Rnd the granlor herehy covenanls wilh said grantee tllat it is lawfully seized of said lqnd in fee
simple; that it has good tighl and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that it hereby fully war-
ranis the tille 10 said land and will d('fend tile same againsl II'e lawful claims of all persons whomsoever;
and that said land is free of all encumbrances
(CORPORATE SEAL)
~n ~itnrss lltdhereof
the granlor has caused tIlesI' presenls to
l>e executed in ils name, and its corporate seal to be hereun/o affixed, by its
-- -- proper officers tllereunto duly autho~ized. the day and year first ahol1f' writ/en.
I ~~--)~y~
ATTEST: ----Th;~~-~Miii~--~---------s~-mtar~---
Signf'd, sealed and rlelioered in the presence of:
__T.HE -- S-CHQQL._BQARD___o.F._uP.AUl --aEA~R__~_Q!JNJ:Y
z;;J-.':=./~m.......u........m
~:~-y(--.~.~.~:~L.._._.__.._._____._
By~4 ;u.CIialrmair.;;;~;...~;.....
STATE OF
COl'NTY OF
FLOR IDA
PALM BEACH
}
ptnonalh" apJH'art'.d
I HEREBY CF.RTIFY that nn thi~ day, hrrnrf" mt', an nHir-..r duly authorizrd in the State and County a(orrsaid In lakt a{""nnwltd~mrnh,
Lynda M. Johnston and Thomas J. Mills
"",tll knn"'- n to mt to be the
Chai mOOn I and
Superintendent
rr5p('cti\l~ly of the corporation nam~d as grantor
in II,. ror.~oin~ d..d. and thar th.y ..,..ally acknowl.d~.d "<<ulin'! th. ,am. in th. p.....nr. or Iwo .uhscrihin,! ..itn..... h.ely and volunlarily
und.. authoritv duly ......d in th.m by ,aid corporation and 11,.1 II,. ..al .m..d 11,...10 i. II,. tru. corporal. ~ _r.r ..~~ corporalion.
WIT:-;ESS my hand and "Hieial ..al in th. Counly and Stal. la'l aror...id Ihi, ~J4,I.. day of ~ . A, D, 19 r 0
Not.y Public, St.te of Flmid. A '. ~
My Commission Expires June 13. 1992 .... ... ~.......7.:...
aoltd... lhru r,., fal.. .. Insurant'. 'ne.
....~,....,........
EXHIBIT "A"
PAGE 1 OF 2 PAGES
J.B.
N87057'47"E 265.00'
S83040'06"W 26718'
rESCRI PTI CJ\l :
A PARCEL OF LAND FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES L YII\(; IN THE f\DRTHWEST
ONE-OJARTER (NWl-) OF SECTIQ\J 18, TCMNSHIP 45 SOOTH, RAl\GE 43 EAST, COLNTY
OF PALM BEACH, STATE OF FLORI Ot\ , AND BEII\G NORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
AS FOLLONS:
CCJvTVE:NCII\G AT THE WEST Q\JE-QJARTER (wt) CORNER OF SAID SECTIQ\J 18j THENCE
NORTH 020 03' 27" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE f\DRTHWEST O\E-oJARTER
(NW~) OF SAID SECTIQ\J 18 A DISTANCE OF 663.95 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF
THE NORTH Q\JE-HALF (Nt) OF THE SOOTH ONE-HALF (st) OF THE NORTI-fWEST
ONE-QUARTER (NWt) OF SAID SECTIQ\J 18 j THENCE f\DRTH 870 57' 47" EAST ALOf\JG
SAID SOOTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 350.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGIN\lIl\Gj
. THENCE CQ\JTIt\AJING ALOf\JG SAID SaJTH LINE Q\J A BEARING OF I\ORTH 870 57' 47"
EAST A DISTANCE OF 265.00 FEET; THENCE SaJTH 830 40' 06" WEST A DISTANCE
OF 267.18 FEET TO A LINE 350.00 FEET EAST OF (AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES
TO) AND PARALLEL WITH THE \",EST LINE OF THE NORTl-MIEST Q\JE-QJARTER (NWJ;)
OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE f\DRTH 020 03' 27" EAST A DISTANCE OF 20.06
FEET TO Tl-tE POINT OF BEGINNING.
tvORE OR LESS.
REVISE BOUNDARY AND 12/8/~-;--r - LMK
DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION REVISED, ]-- - I
CHANGED CONCAVE SOUTH D~/~ I 10/10/89: R. S.
rCONCAVE NOR~~~~~__j ___ ___
. SUBJECT I DATE BY
'- - - - ---- - - --- -- -- - --- -- -
REVISIONS
F.R.S. & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, LAND PLANNERS
WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA
APPROVED BY
SCALE: N.T.S.
DATE: 9/5/89
DRAWN BY GWZ
JOB NO.
'AS BEEN MADE BY .THIS
SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION
FOR A PARCEL FOR R / W
PURPOSES
FOR: CITRUS PARK
89-S-42
DRAWING NUMBER
. ,,74
.
WITNESS CORNE R
FD 40' SOUTH
Q~
~O
5.i=
o&J
(3U)
0::1.&..
uO
~~
=> - .
n.~:::
<f ~~
-I.&..W
oo~
Q;:
~~ ~
0::-0)
-J1l)
w.....o;t'
U
~ ill a.:
w5:~
~ I-
<t'w~
-1~~
~
PO.C.-
/3
.
~
I'f)
OJ
C\J
I'f)
cD
C\j
OJ
C\J
r<>
....
.,
...",
.'2 7
NW CORNER SECTION /8
N 88"OS'39"E
EXHIBIT "A"
PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES
S 87057'47"W
350. 90'
/'..
C\J _
-,.,., If)-
0""7
o 0
C\J(O
~!
)-
350.00'
w
~
C\J-
.Il)
r<>-:
-- --... 00
o U)
C\J
o
F
40,/6
-
10
0'>
,...;
to
(0
350.90'
N 87057'47'E
.
P.lS No, 3238 N02002' 12"W 20.01
\ N 02003'27'E 20.06'
L. SOUTH LINE OF THE N. 1/2 OF
S.I/2 OF N.W. 1/4 OF SECTION 18
E - W. QUARTER SECTION II NE OF SECTION 18
N 87055 04 E
THE WEST 1/4 CORNER'OF SECTION 18
P.B. COUNTY BRASS DISK FD
;....
co
,...;
C\J
I'f)
NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SW 1/4 OF SECTION 18
SW CORNER OF SECTION 18
P. B. COJNTY BRASS DISK
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
NO SEARCH OF THE PUBLIC RECORQS
OFFICE.
y
MEMORANDUM
October 25, 1988
TO: PETER L. CHENEY, CITY MANAGER
FROM: CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
RE: ADOp,TION OF ORDINANCES FOR THREE ANNEXATION,
LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT AND REZONING
REQUESTS ON LAWRENCE ROAD
Accompanying this memorandum you will find a copy of the
correspondence from the Florida Department of Community Affairs
indicating that the above-referenced requests are consistent with
Section 163.3177 of the Florida Statutes. By copy of this
memorandum, I am requesting that the City Attorney prepare the
necessary ordinances to annex, amend the future land use element
and rezone these properties. copies of the legal descriptions
for these properties including the rights-of-way to be annexed
are attached.
J
("1 ~ ;L 7- ~-:;C
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO .
CSA:ro
Attachments
cc City Attorney
Alan Miller
August Hernandez
James Sturrock
.
.Beard !Jf County Commissioners
Carol A. Roberts, Cbair
_ C:arol J. Elmquist, Vice Chairm:\ll
Karen T. Marcus
Dorothy Wilken
Jim Watt
County Administrator
J an Winters
~ , . '# .
Planning Division
--,
August 24, 1988
I
!
~.. .....
Mr. Ralph K. Hook
Department of Community Affairs
Bureau of Local Planning
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, FL 32399
Re: City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Amendments:
Citrus Glen - Phase II
Elementary School UP"
Lawrence Lake
Dear Mr. Hook:
The Palm Beach County Planning Division has reviewed the above
referenced amendment requests and has the following comments.
1. The three sites are located within the Medium - Medium High
Land Use Category and are zoned Agricultural Residential
(AR). Generally, the maximum density which may be permitted
in this land use category in 12 dwellings per acre.
2. The proposed density of the Citrus Glen Phase II (3.68
dwellings per acre) and Lawrence Lake (2.44 dwellings per
acre) projects are well within the maximum permitted density
of 12 dwellings per acre in the Medium - Medium High Land
Use Category.
3. There is some concern that the configuration of the annexa-
tions may not meet the requirements for "compactness" as
defined in Chapter 171.031.(12). This paragraph precludes
any annexation which created "enclaves, pockets, or finger
areas in serpentine patterns."
4. The three proposed developments have been review~d for
consistency with the County's traffic policies and goals, no
significant problems were identified. The County's comments
have been forwarded to the City of Boynton Beach for their
consideration.
800 13th Street P.B.I.A.
3
West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 . (407) 697-4001
2
Thank you for your cooperation.
Respectfully,
51
Stan Redick
Planning Director
SR:RW:dd FllE:GM8\HOOKBB
cc: Sam Shannon, Assistant County Administrator
John lower, Acting Executive Director, PZB
Board of County Commissioners
4
treQlure
co~t
regional
Plannin, g
counc I
September 16, 1988
Mr. Ralph K. Hook
Department of Community Affairs
Bureau of State Planning
2740 Centerview Drive
The Rhyne Building
Tallahassee, FL 32399
Subject: City of Boynton Beach Local Government
Comprehensive Plan Documents
Dear Mr. Hook:
Pursuant to the requirements of the Local Government
Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act,
Chapter 163, Florida statutes, the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council reviewed the amendments to the Future Land. Use
Element of the City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan at its
regular meeting on September 16, 1988.
The following comments were approved by Council for transmittal
to the state Department of Community Affairs (DCA) pursuant to
Sections 163.3184(1) (c) and (2), Florida statutes, and for
consideration by the City prior to adoption of the documents.
Evaluation
The proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element have been
reviewed in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 163,
Florida Statutes, Council's review procedures, and Council's
adopted plans and pOlicies. The complete evaluation comments and
agenda item as presented to the Council is enclosed. Council
adopted the comments as presented in the agenda item and
unanimously approved their transmittal to DCA.
If you need additional information or have any questions, please
do not hesitate to call.
Cary
Director
DMC: lb
3221 I.W. martin downl blvd.
lulte 205 · p.o. box 1529
palm olty, tlorlda ~990
phone (<107) 216.3313
llmmlnlx
chairman
thomal g. kenny. III
vice chairman
John acor
lecrelaryltrealurer
danlel m. cary
executive dlreclor
-~---
-:;
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL-
MEMORANDUM
To:
Council Members
AGENDA ITHl SA
From: Staff
Date: September 16, 1988 Council Meeting
Subject: Local Government Comprehensive Plan Review -
Three Amendments to the City of Boynton Beach
Future Land Use Element
Introduction
Pursuant to the provisions of the Local Government
Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act,
Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, the Council must be provided an
opportunity to review and comment on comprehensive plan
amendments prior to their adoption. The City of Boynton Beach
has submitted proposed amendments to the State Department of
Communi ty Affairs, which in turn is seeking Council's
comments.
Council's review of the information forwarded by the
Department of Community Affairs is in the context of the
relationship of the proposed amendments to the regional policy
plan developed pursuant to Section 186.507, Florida Statutes.
If a conflict with adopted plans or policies is identified,
the regional 'planning agency is to specify any obj ections and
may make recommendations for modifications. Council also
provides informal comments to the local government through a
spirit of cooperation, and technical assistance on matters
related to the proposed amendments. These advisory comments
are aimed at providing coordination between the local and
regional comprehensive plans.
Backaround
The City of Boynton Beach is considering three amendments to
the Future Land Use Element. The locations of the properties
under consideration are shown on the accompanying map, and the
number of acres and proposed changes in land use designations
are summarized in the following list: -
NOTk.. ~ OF LA~lD USE 'CHJ... JGE
NOTJCE OF ZOi\Ui'.IG ,C:-L~NGE
The Cicy of Boynton Beach ~ro?oses co annex, ch~n~e Che l~nri use ~nd
t~zone che i....lllO .....ithin ::::~ ~re.:l shc~o'n i:;. ::::c :::~:; i,1 till,:; _,J'/~r:::::':;:;:::enL
A public hearing on chese proposals will ~e held before chc ?l~nni~~
'"::1:1 Z~nin~ :ucrc ;m J.:<:~:::ber ~~. :::Si.:c . :~,") '.:::. ,It :'i::.:l.:nd ?l:!z~.
211 South ?eder~l Hiq~way, 3oyrlc:n 3~~c~, Flcrid~.
... public hear:':"!:! en c:.::se ?r~';)osals '..;ill,l::;o :,C :>~:J :er:lre ::~C
C:i.::: C~~.mission on :>t:ce~ber li, 19,7,.:it 3:00 ?:7~.. ~r ~:s soon c:1~rc.:li:.~r
:lS :~e CJgenda ?er=i:s, .:t: :i:'lel.:~c ?l.1::c:1, 21t SQUi:~ :~~cr.:11 :::';~~':.:l:-',
~oynton 3~ach, ?lor:~~.
,,,"
')0' -
4'
..---.. ..",~
- '-;V'
- ,~
-...... - ~
I ,"'eOAt
I _, 1"\.
:... W .::1,:).
_.J:^N^L
=CITRUS_GL:N_L
I :'..::-
'-'" .. .....-.... , .,'::
.. -.....-.-..-.... -. ::.;~!...=
-=- ;-.-... 'I . :--:"! .'....AP?LICA Tl0N "'~O.1 h~.:I:
~i __.~ '.. . (6.A1'........t _~,"'_
,-,...- ---APPLlCATION NO.2 t ~~7:~..~\J~
-,', ('A~) -I '..;:;.;;::-~~
-.....--- . el' "L..._ -....-.
--.=::::t:n.... ~t.. ......Tc l -~~ - . ..- I '0. 1 -.--- --
- -- : APPlICA~10N NO.3 _~7,':-;.~.~.: I: "F= r
I I (f,A') , II! ! i I
I I r ' I 0 iJ n I 'I " I
I I : '" I -=:=: -=;
I J !===
-~-t""'4..,- ..,...,...'n-----.~vENU~_
--------j I -. , --. =-0 1=:---'
r=: '-' ---:-,:::: .._ _._
I 1---.' ~ -I I ..:.. I ~: -=:
I 1---... '-', , I; II" ',' J I: ,;
I I ~'t'r~ ;-.r=W: : ! . . . ./ I,'
I I .' . , U . ......'....
t ., ~ ,'!' =-:.. L.; ~ : I -=-=-;:=.' ~--=
I I =~.,~ ......'~.. It: "I , \..:..:=..~"=".=.:
~~I.,...O.~.--CJ..N.AI'--_. _. -II!.., . "1"1 ~ ____
~ , ... - -~~;::::~~-~:-.~~:-..
i111 ~::._~;.~:...-'::',;......~.........~_.;-._.:..._:=. ~..:. .,::.~-"~r-.-:.::~:f~;~:1 ,~; ~~:::;:::7~: :: ;;;,.,j,' i II!!
." _.--- -i ;:.~: ;..::;;~~~~:~:..:~::.:~~:.~-; :::11
I :::====:::::=:::=~-=:-~ 0 .W,:) Itw~
- - I _~_,-,..''';:'':: ~. "'. _''''_. ~:. :: ., ...:;, _ _.... .
--- -- 30YNTON eMIAI.. c-,e
. ...... -=---:-:~--:--: : ;;"::'.' ":'~li! -::.:..,--:-..-. ~..-.J
_:~tr;cS ~O.'.C-:
.~-
- ."'...". -. I
~~./~:-'~: :~..!. ~:.:;
,~'~:2" .....' ~ -: .,,::~"-..:I
~. ~~~. ;.; 7;": ~~
~ '\:'1 ~~I ..:-
.. - ""'-:.:.,
"',- a~-.~'"
.~
..
- .' . ~
--
:..
-:,.-.' -=~ ;i:
--.-- .
--::-:-. :- .. .
-...... :'L
c.. .. .. "-..::.' ~ ;
. :. !:..
,.~. -'.
~ .::.:""7 ~
I : lA'..~' ..~-;;
...-
': ':_:-'.,~
. ..,.
, Ji:;j
'~~>
, .---:. :
-.';-' --, t
,.~ '-"" .
''-';''-~ -
.-=
--
.-,
:/'
CI1
CI1
U
c::
_(.:2
I ~~:~=.~
.' -':'::'.1
1'- ......., I
,,-i, ,
~.;: :~.: :
.--:...." .
'1
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
PROPOSED COMP PLAN AMENDMENTS
1
..~...
a_____ _________
''<<<
lJoard ~f County Commissioners
::arol A. Roberts, 01air
::arol J. BJmquist. Vice Cbainnnn
~areD T. Marcus
Dorothy Wilken
fim Watt
,fit
County Administrator
Jan Wmters
Planning Division
SEP, 2 1988
August 24, 1988
BUREAU OF LOCAL
RCE PLANNYf5)
RESOU IPi /E;"CS ~'~ffi)
( 1)Jlj
SEP ~ 1988
Mr. Ralph K. Hook
Department of Community Affairs
Bureau of Local Planning
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, FL 32399
~~EAU OF LOCAL
f~, ,," .,j"JG I PLAN REVIEW
Re: City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Amendments:
Citrus Glen - Phase II
elementary School "P"
Lawrence Lake
Dear Mr. Hook:
The Palm Beach County Planning Division has reviewed the above
referenced amendment requests and has the following comments.
1. The three sites are located within the Medium - Medium High
Land Use Category and are zoned Agricultural Residential
(AR). Generally, the maximum density which may be permitted
in this land use category in 12 dwellings per acre.
2. The proposed density of the Citrus Glen Phase II (3.68
dwellings per acre) and Lawrence Lake (2.44 dwellings per
acre) projects are well within the maximum permitted density
of 12 dwellings per acre in the Medium - Medium High Land
Use Category.
3. There is some concern that the configuration of the annexa-
tions may not meet the requirements for "compactness" as
defined in Chapter 171.031.(12). This paragraph precludes
any annexation which created "enclaves, pockets, or finger
areas in serpentine patterns."
4. The three proposed developments have been reviewed for
consistency with the County's traffic policies and goals, no
significant problems were identified. The County's comments
have been forwarded to the City of Boynton Beach for their
consideration.
ROO 1 ~th S,treet P .B.I.A.
West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 . (407) 697-4001
2
Thank you for your cooperation.
Respectfully,
51-
Stan Redick
Planning Director
SR:RW:dd FILE:GM8\HOOKBB
cc: Sam S~annon, Assistant County Administrator
John Lower, Acting Executive Director, PZB
Board of County Commissioners
Florida Department of Environmental Regulation
Twin Towers Office Bldg. . 2600 Blair Stone Road. Tallahassee, FlQrida 32399-2400
Bob Martinez, Governor
Dale Twachtmann, Secretary
John Shearer. Assistant Secretary
August 26, 1f.'~~
I, ,
t \
.t). .
Mr. Ralph K. Hook
Department of community Affairs
Bureau of Local planning
2740 centerview Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
BUR:'FJ C- L.
ELANi~:NG I p:..},r; I,C..L"',:
RE: city of Boynton Beach plan Amendments 6A2, 6A3, GA4, GAS,
GAG, GA7
Dear Mr. Hook:
The Department of Environmental Regulation has reviewed the
amendments from the City of Boynton Beach according to the
interim review procedures of Chapter 9J-II, Florida
Administrative Code. The Department has no specific comments or
suggestions to offer concerning the proposed amendments and
concur with the summary of staff analysis and recommendations for
each amendment.
However, we do have a few comments to offer about the Master
Development plan for Citrus Glen phase II as it relates to
stormwater management. It appears that wet detention basins will
be used for on-site stormwater management. We suggest that
grassed swales be used rather than curb and gutters adjacent to
the int ernal roadways. Grassed swales will provide addit ional
treatment before stormwater runoff reaches the wet detention
syst ems. I n add it ion, we suggest that Saw-g rass, Bul rush, or
Softrush be used instead of cattails as part of the littoral
wetland planting areas. A copy of the Department's guidance for
the development of stormwater detention basins is enclosed.
please forward this document to the city of Boynton Beach with
your Department's response.
If you have any quest ions about our comment s please call me at
487-2498.
Sincerely,
aL-IJ~.
/ii~? r B. out land
Office of planning and Research
JBO
enclosure'
CITRUS GLEN - PHASE II
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ALL THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 18, TWP. 45 SOUTH, RANGE
43 EAST PALM BEACH COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLLOWS:
THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
(SW1/4) OF THE~RTHWESTQUARTER (NW1/4); AND THE NORTH-
EAST QUARTER ( Wl 4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW1/4) OF
THE NORTHWEST RTER (NW1/4); AND~ NORTHWEST QUARTER
(NW1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER ( Wl 4) OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER (NW1/4) OF SECTION EIGHTEE (18), TOWNSHIP FORTY-
FIVE (45) SOUTH, RANGE FORTY-THREE (43) EAST, PALM BEACH
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
SUBJECT TO RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, LIMITATIONS, CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS
AND AGREEMENTS OF RECORD.
CONTAINING 28.82 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF LAWRENCE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY ABUTTING THE WEST
PROPERTY LINE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
ALL OF THE ABOVE BEING LOCATED IN PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA.
/
I
LAWRENCE LAKE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE EAST 313.50 FEET OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF (Ni) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER
(NWI) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (NWI) OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (SWI),
OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST
AND
THE NORTH ONE-HALF (Ni) OF THE SOUTH ONE-HALF (Si) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER
(NWI) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (NWI) OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (SWI)
AND THE NORTH 495.00 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER (NEI) OF THE NORTHWEST
ONE-QUARTER (NWI) OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (SWI) AND THE NORTH 495.00 FEET
OF THE WEST 132.00 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (NWI) OF THE NORTHEAST
ONE-QUARTER (NEI) OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (SWI) IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP
45 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST,
TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT CANAL L-21 RIGHT
OF WAY ABUTTING THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED SUBJECT PROPERTY
INCLUDING THE L-21 CANAL RIGHT OF WAY LOCATED BETWEEN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
AND LAWRENCE ROAD AND THAT PORTION OF LAWRENCE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY ABUTTING THE
WEST PROPERTY LINE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
ALL OF THE AB.OVE BEING LOCATED IN PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA.
.'
DC'II 1 n 'R/R7
1/ Lt) 'f S /" IJ....,.,O I t'L f q
f L e /'f. f3 IV T/L7'- L {/ <../ L-
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
THE SOUTH ONE-HALF (S.~) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (S.W.~)
OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, Tm-mSHIP 45 SOU'rH,
RANGE 43 EAST,
TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF LAWRENCE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY
AHUTTING 'fH.t: wt: S '1' PROPER'ry LINE (YF THE SUBJECT PROPEI~TY.
ALL OF THE'ABOVE BEING LOCATED IN PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA.
GROSS AREA (INCLUDING ROAD AND CANAL R/W) 19.23 ACRES
LAWRENCE ROAD R/W (40' EAST OF SECTION LINE) 0.61 ACRES
L.W.D.D. R/W (151 REQUIRED R/W OR EASEMENT) 0.42 ACRES
NET AREA LESS LAWRENCE ROAD R/W
NET AREA LESS ROAD AND CANAL R/W
18.62 ACRES
18.20 ACRES
I""
...~' .
(,'0'.'
-
;.:;;t.~""~'~~
.... .?w~"",'
M E M 0 RAN DUM
April 1, 1988
TO: BETTY BORONI, CITY CLERK
FROM: JAMES J. GOLDEN, SENIOR CITY PLANNER
RE: CITRUS GLEN PHASE II
The purpose of this memorandum is to inform you that the contract
to purchase the above-referenced property which was held by Alan
Miller (Intracoastal Development Corporation) has been terminated
and the current owner (Boynton Nurseries, Inc.) is requesting
that the legal documentation be modified and that this
application continue to be processed for approval (see attached
correspondence).
In connection with the above, you will find accompanying this
memorandum copies of the revised legal documentation which should
be included in your files for this project.
-J:-- f. AP.L
ES J {) GOLDEN
JJG:ro
cc City Attorney
Central File
'--...
MEMORANDUM
TO
CaJ::men ArmW1Ziato
Plarming Director
DATI'
November,24, 1987
"IL~
"'110M
Kevin J. Hallahan
Forester/Horticulturist
.uu~eT Citrus Glen Phase I, II
and Lawrence Lake P. U .D. IS
I am working with the developer in preparation of the Tree Managerrent Plan
for these Planned Unit Developrents. 'lhe landscape architect will be
sending copies of this plan showing details and incorporation into the
Hareowner Asscx=iation docurrents.
ff~ ~'jjdlL
Kevin J. I
KJH:ad
t.
"
.,
--~ ~~~.._.
---
M E M 0 RAN DUM
November 12, 1987
TO: Mr. Jim Golden
Senior City Planner
FROM: Torn Clark
City Engineer
RE: Master Plan, Phase I & II, Citrus Glen
.
Comments:
1. Elevations of adjacent property should be shown on
topographical survey.
2. Street lighting should be indicated on the plan.
3. An eight foot concrete bicycle path or a five foot
sidewalk will be required in Lawrence Road for the
extent of the project frontage. This construction
is to be approved by the City and the County.
-
v~ - ~&J-----
Tom Clark
TAC:ck
r- .
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: Carmen Annunziato, Director
Planning Department
FROM: Charles Fredrick, Director
Recreation and Park Department
DATE: November la, 1987
SUBJECT: Citrus Glen I and Citrus Glen II
.
Upon review of these sites and the proposed five acre
dedication, the following applies:
Citrus Glen I :
Citrus Glen II:
229 units x .018AC/unit = $173,029
106 units x .018AC/unit = $ 94,446
$267,475
The five acre dedication is valued at $267,500 based on
a purchase price of $49,500/acre.
$267,475
-247,500
$19,975 fee due in addition to five acre dedication.
Recommend the five acre site be deeded to the city and
the $19,975 in fees paid at the time the first plat is
approved.
~~Vn-
CharI s Fredrick
CC: John Wildner
DOC:CITGLEN
CF:ad
,
.
RECEIVED
NOV 1 0 ~8B1
PL^N"
_... :.-(..JT.
-
MEMORANDUM
To: CarMen Annunziato, PlanTnng Direct
FrOM: John A. Guidry, Director of
Date: October 27, 1987 (Revised NoveMber 13,
Subject: TRS Review - Citrus Glen - Phase II Master Plan
We can approve the above-referenced Master plarl, subject to the follow-
i.ng conditions:
1. Provide an engineering rationale for selection of a 6" water Mai~
leading to an 8" Main in the southwest portion of the pr'oject.
Z. Add valving as required.
3. Maintain a 10' MiniMUM separation between water Mains and all
building5.
4. The plan should stipulate an early dedication of the ddditio~al
right-of-way in Lawrence Road, 50 dS to facilitate construction of
the off-site utilities.
5. Gravity sewers Must be extended as needed 50 dS to front all
buildable lots within the project.
6. This departMent will design and Manage construction of the off-
site water Main, COMpleting It frOM Miner Road to N.W. Z2nd Ave.
The developer Must execute an agreeMent with the City to fund his
share of said water Main.
dMt
M E M 0 RAN DUM
October 26, 1987
TO: CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
FROM: JAMES J. GOLDEN, SENIOR CITY PLANNER
RE: CITRUS GLEN PHASE II PUD MASTER PLAN
Please be advised of the following in connection with the
above-referenced master plan:
I. The building footprint for Lot #92 must be modified as
it does not provide for the placement of a zero lot
line unit.
2. A sidewalk is required on the west side of the 60 foot
wide public street in accordance with the City's
subdivision and platting regulations.
3. With respect to the "Development Data" tabulation,
the allowed density is 4.82 units per acre, not
4.84 units per acre.
4. The applicant has not yet submitted a formal tree survey.
5. Please advise concerning recommended language for the
right-of-way dedications for Lawrence Road and the ~
shared access road with the school site in connection with
the annexation/rezoning approval.
j, };J)J(
~JI GOLDEN
JJG:ro
cc Central File
.....-
lv\EMORANDUM
o
Carmen Annunziato
Planning Director
OAT!'
October 26, 1987
,.IL[
"0"
Don Jaeger
Building Department
5UeJI'CT
Master Plan Review:
Citrus Glen, Phase II
The following comments were generated from the submission relating to
a master plan approval for Citrus Glen, Phase II:
1. Landscaping for all common areas must be reviewed and approved
at the Community Appearance Board. These plans are requir~d
to be submitted along with the preliminary plat documents for
City review. All common areas and landscaped areas in the
right-of-way must be fully sprinkled.
2. Sidewalks are required along both sides of the proposed local
access road.
3. All trees are required to be a minimum of eight (8) feet in
height at the time of planting.
4. The survey indicates that existing overhead power lines encroach
on proposed lots in both Phase I and II. This condition should
be resolved and proper easements dedicated prior to preliminary
plat submittal.
5. Demolition permits are required for the removal of any structures
on the site.
;~
Don ~eg ;-I^--
DJ:bh
XC: E. E. Howell
MEMORANDUM
October 1, 1987
TO: FINANCE DEPARTMENT
FROM: JAMES J. GOLDEN, SENIOR CITY PLANNER
RE: PROCESSING FEES
Attached, please find the following checks:
Addison Square Corp., site Plan Modification, in the amount of .
$200.00.
Hunters Run-Cambridge I-Tract 0-2, site plan Modification, in the
amount of $200.00.
citrus Glen Phase 2, Master Plan Modification, in the amount of
$200.00.
Citrus Glen Phase 2, Annexation, in the amount of $500.00.
Lawrence Lake, Rezoning, Land Use Amendment, in the amount of
$1,200.00.
Lawrence Lake, Annexation, in the amount of $500.00.
\ ~itrus Glen Phase 2, Land Use Amendment, in the amount of
~1,200.00.
The account numbers are indicated on the back of the checks.
J:;;;.f~o~
CSA:ro
Attaclunents
cc central File
. .
M E M 0 RAN DUM
November 17, 1987
TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS, PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
FROM: CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
RE: REQUESTS FOR ANNEXATION, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
AMENDMENT AND REZONING SUBMITTED BY MICHAEL D.
GORDON FOR INTRACOASTAL DEVELOPMENT, INC.
(CITRUS GLEN PHASE II)
INTRODUCTION
Michael D. Gordon, agent for Intracoastal Development, Inc.,
applicant, is proposing to annex into Boynton Beach a 28.82 acre
tract of land located on the east side of Lawrence Road, south of
Miner Road extended (see Exhibit "A"). The property is
currently zoned AR (Agriculture Residential) and it is occupied
by a tree nursery and orange grove which are currently in
commercial production. This request represents an expansion
of a previous proposal (Citrus Glen) which was approved by the
City Commission in July, 1987.
Paralleling this request for annexation is a request to amend the
Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan to show annexed
land as Low Density Residential, and to rezone this property to a
Planned Unit Development with a Land Use Intensity =4 (PUD
w/LUI=4). The proposed PUD, to be named "Citrus Glen Phase II"
provides for the construction of I06 fee simple, single-family
detached, zero lot line units with a gross density of 3.68
dwelling units per acre (see Exhibit "B").
Also accompanying this request is a request for a master plan
modification to the approved Citrus Glen project, to allow for
the incorporation of Citrus Glen Phase II.
PROCEDURE
These applications for annexation, amendment to the Future Land
Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and rezoning are being
processed consistent with State Statutes, and Boynton Beach
Codes, Ordinances and Resolutions as follows:
1. F.S. 163.3161: Local Government Comprehensive Planning and
Land Development Regulation Act.
2. F.S. 166.041: Procedures for Adoption of Ordinances and
Resolutions.
3. F.S. 171.011: Municipal Annexation and Contraction Act.
4. Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, Appendix A, Section 3A5(e):
Boundary and Zoning.
5. Boynton Beach Ordinance #79-24.
6. Boynton Beach Resolution #76-X: Procedures for Annexation.
7. Boynton Beach Ordinance #86-54: Comprehensive Plan Evalua-
tion and Appraisal Report.
These regulations have been listed for informational purposes.
Paraphrasing, these regulations require review by the City
Department Heads, newspaper advertisements, pUblic hearings with
the Planning and Zoning Board and the City Commission and Commis-
sion adoption of ordinances to annex, amend the Future Land Use
Element and rezone.
-2-
CURRENT LAND USE AND ZONING
As previously discussed, this property is undeveloped and zoned
AR (Agricultural Residential). The land use and zoning in the
surrounding area varies and is presented for your information in
the table which follows:
DIRECTION
JURISDICTION
ZONING
North
Palm Beach County
(Future Boynton
Beach)
AR
(Future
PUD)
East
Southeast
Palm Beach County
RS
South
Palm Beach County
RS/SE
(Special
Exception
for a
public
elemen-
tary
school)
West
Palm Beach County
AR
FUTURE LAND USE AND REZONING
LAND USE
Undeveloped
mature orange
grove no longer
commercially
productive
(Knollwood
Orange Groves,
Inc.) to become
229 unit Citrus
Glen PUD with
LUI=4.0 upon
annexation.
Mobile Home Park
(Sunny South
Estates).
Undeveloped
tree nursery in
commercial
production
(Boynton
Nurseries, Inc.)
to be developed
for a public
elementary
school.
Undeveloped tree
nursery in com-
mercial produc-
tion (Boynton
Nurseries, Inc.)
Hypoluxo Road forms the northern limit of the City's Reserve
Annexation Area and the City's Utility Service Area. Lawrence Road
forms the western limit of the City's Reserve Annexation Area, as set
forth by the Commission's policy, which is reflected
in the Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report.
It is contemplated that all lands between Lawrence Road and
Congress Avenue and between Boynton Beach Boulevard and Hypoluxo
Road will at some time in the future be annexed. This proposal
represents a continuation of previous actions to close unincorporated
pockets in this portion of the reserve annexation area.
The land use category requested, Low Density Residential, is
lower than that which exists to the east, south, and west in Palm
Beach County and consistent with that which has been approved by
the Commission to the north in the City (Citrus Glen). As noted
in the correspondence in Exhibit "C" from the Palm Beach County
Planning Department, the proposed land use is consistent with the
current development pattern and the future plans for land use
in Palm Beach County for this area.
-3-
Since the grove and nursery are in commercial production, there are
many mature trees existing on site. It is recommended that the
existing trees within the grove and nursery be preserved to the
greatest extent possible, and incorporated as an amenity to this
project, consistent with the memorandum from the
Forester/Horticulturist which appears in Exhibit "C".
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES
There are three policies in the Comprehensive Plan which address
annexations as follows:
1. "Annex only property which is reasonably contiguous to
present municipal boundaries;"
2. "Annex property only after the preparation of a study
evaluating the fiscal benefits of annexation versus the
cost of providing service;" and
3. "Annex only properties which are of sufficient size to pro-
vide efficient service and on which urban development is
anticipated. II
In order to determine the consistency of the Intracoastal
Development Company request with the Comprehensive Plan Policies,
each of the three policies will be addressed individually.
Policy I - "Annex only property which is reasonably contiguous to
the present municipal boundaries."
Upon second reading of the ordinance to annex the Citrus Glen
property by the City Commission, the Intracoastal Development
Company property will be contiguous with the corporate limits
along its entire northern property boundary (approximately
1,894 feet or 37% of its entire boundary), and its western boundary is
coterminous with Lawrence Road. In addition, this property lies in
the path of urban development.
Policy 2 - "Annex property only after the preparation of a study
evaluating the fiscal benefits of annexation versus the costs of
providing services."
In response to policy two, you will find in Exhibit "C", the
cost to the City of annexing this parcel and the dollars returned
to the City in taxes.
Policy 3 - "Annex only properties which are of sufficient size to
provide efficient service and on which urban development is
anticipated. II
As previously reported, the Intracoastal Development Company
tract is 28.82 acres in size. It is anticipated that this parcel will
experience urban development for the following reasons:
I. The availability of public utilities within the Lawrence
Road right-of-way and the future right-of-way for Miner
Road;
2. The existence of this parcel as a County pocket in a develop-
ing portion of the Reserve Annexation Area, as outlined in
the correspondence from the Palm Beach County Planning
Department in Exhibit "C";
3. The efficiency of services to be provided when analyzed in
connection with existing property on Lawrence Road currently
in the City (Knollwood Groves), the recent approval by the
City Commission for the annexation of the 53.6 acre Citrus
Glen project and the 48.23 acre Lawrence Groves project,
the proposed annexations for the 19.23 acre Palm Beach
County School Board and the 11.521 acre Lawrence Lake
project, and the proximity to developing properties
within Palm Beach County; and
-4-
4. Recent and proposed improvements to the surrounding road
system, including the four (4) laning of Hypoluxo Road, the
the proposed six (6) laning of Boynton Beach Boulevard from
Congress Avenue to Military Trail, the proposed five (5)
laning of Old Boynton Road from Knuth Dairy Road to Military
Trail, and the proposed four (4) laning of Military Trail
from Old Boynton Road to Hypoluxo Road.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Department recommends that the applications
submitted by Michael D. Gordon, for Intracoastal Development
Company Inc., trustee, be approved subject to the comments listed
in this memorandum as Exhibit "C". This recommendation is based
in part on the following:
1. The parcel, upon annexation of Citrus Glen in the near future,
will be contiguous to the Corporate limits;
2. The parcel lies within a County pocket and it is in the path
of urban development;
3. The parcel is located within the City's municipal service
area;
4. The intensity of land use desired is appropriate for the
location;
5. The request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
policies for annexation;
6. The land use category requested must be considered as a part
of an overall strategy for annexation and it is appropriate;
7. The zoning is consistent with the proposed use of the site;
8. The request will not impair the value or future use of lands
in the surrounding area and,
9. The costs to serve versus the benefits received indicate a
positive return for the City.
c____ It - 7....~
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO
CSA:ro
cc City Manager
Technical Review Board
Central File
MEMORANDUM
November 16, 1987
TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
FROM: CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
RE: CITRUS GLEN PHASE II - STAFF COMMENTS
Please be advised of the Planning Departments comments in
connection with the above-referenced request:
I. Developer to dedicate right-of-way for Lawrence Road forty
(40) feet from centerline to Palm Beach County within forty-five
(45) days of master plan approval.
2. Project signage requires site plan approval.
3. Common area landscaping requires review and approval by the
Community Appearance Board in connection with preliminary plat
and/or site plan approval.
4. Right-of-way for shared access road with the elementary
school site to be dedicated within thirty (30) days of master
plan approval. Construction of said road to be coordinated with
the Palm Beach County School Board.
5. A copy of the IIComprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal
Report-Summary of Development Policies II should be obtained from
the Planning Department and reviewed prior to platting.
c2.fI1 '-. fC ~
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO
CSA:ro
cc Central File
M E M 0 RAN DUM
November 12, 1987
TO: Mr. Jim Golden
Senior City Planner
FROM: Tom Clark
City Engineer
RE: Master Plan, phase I & II, Citrus Glen
Comments:
1. Elevations of adjacent property should be shown on
topographical survey.
2. Street lighting should be indicated on the plan.
3. An eight foot concrete bicycle path or a five foot
sidewalk will be required in Lawrence Road for the
extent of the project frontage. This construction
is to be approved by the City and the County.
-
v~- -~
Tom Clark
TAC:ck
, M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: Carmen Annunziato, Director
Planning Department
FROM: Charles Fredrick, Director
Recreation and Park Department
DATE: November 10, 1987
SUBJECT: Citrus Glen I and Citrus Glen II
Upon review of these sites and the proposed five acre
dedication, the following applies:
citrus Glen I :
Citrus Glen II:
229 units x .018AC/unit = $173,029
106 units x .018AC/unit = $ 94,446
$267,475
The five acre dedication is valued at $267,500 based on
a purchase price of $49,500/acre.
$267,475
-247,500
$19,975 fee due in addition to five acre dedication.
Recommend the five acre site be deeded to the City and
the $19,975 in fees paid at the time the first plat is
approved.
~
CC: John Wildner
DOC:CITGLEN
CF:ad
,
REre. Fn7~D
-...... v JL,
M E M 0 RAN DUM
f~vV 1 0 1981
PtJ,;'.j Nil
D EPT~ \
-\
.......
TO: Mr. Carmen Annunziato
Planning Director
DATE: November 9, 1987
FROM: Betty S. Boroni
City Clerk
RE: Planning & Zoning Board
Meeting of December 10, 1987
Attached please find copies of the following notices scheduled
to be advertised for the December 10, 1987 Planning & Zoning Board
meeting:
Notice of Rezoning Change and Notice of Land Use Change
(Application I - Intracoastal Development, Inc.>
(Application 2 - The School Board of Palm Beach Co.>
(Application 3 - Intracoastal Development, Inc.>
~~.
Betty; . Boroni
BSB/aa
attachment
cc: City Manager
AGE N DAM E M 0 RAN DUM
November 9, 1987
TO: PETER L. CHENEY, CITY MANAGER
FROM: CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
RE: CITRUS GLEN PHASE II ADDITION - ANNEXATION
Accompanying this memorandum you will find a copy of an
application for annexation submitted by Michael D. Gordon for
Intracoastal Development, Inc., appliqant. Mr. Gordon is
proposing to annex a 28.82 acre tract of land located at the
southeast corner of Lawrence Road and Miner Road extended. This
request represents a southerly expansion of the previous Citrus
Glen application which was recently approved by the City
Commission. In addition to the annexation application, you will
find a legal description for a right-of-way impacted by this
annexation which should be incorporated (a portion of Lawrence
Road adjacent to this property).
Please place this item on the Commission Agenda for the November
17, 1987 meeting for the Commission's consideration and for
forwarding to the Planning and Zoning Board for public hearings.
c~~- - ~ ~
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIAro
CSA:ro
Attachments
I
cc Central File
-~ ----.....:--~ -_.,~._~
R y-,t""'~r. T'"~T~D'
_ f1..-{ rl .,!,' ! _ J t-:.
, ~L uJ.~_~ '. ..LJ'<
MEMORANDUM
---------
October 30, 1987
OCT 30 1987
PLANNii-JG Di:.PT.
TO:
James J. Golden, Senior City Planner
FROM:
Raymond A. Rea, City Attorney
RE:
CITRUS GLEN PHASE II ADDITION PUD
---------------------------------------------------
LAWRENCE LAKE PUD
VIA LAG0 PCD (FORMERLY BOYNTON BEACH VILLAGE CENTER)
---------------------------------------------------
In regard to the above entitled matters and your Memorandum
to me of October 13, 1987, please be advised that I have reviewed
the legal documentation for these projects and it appears that
they meet the requirements for unif ied control, as outlined in
Section 6 of Appendix B, Planned Unit Developments and Section
6-F(3) of Appendix A, Zoning, of the Code of Ordinances
respectively.
~~o.-
City At orney
RAR./r
Ene.
cc: Peter Cheney, City Manager
Central Files
MEMORANDUM
p..... .......~---."
'. .6 ~,
..::......~- -<_..:;:'
TO
Carmen Annunziato
Planning Director
DATE
October 26, 1981'L.n',
- ~ II
FILE
FltOM
Don Jaeger
Building Department
SU.JECT
Master Plan Review:
Citrus Glen, Phase II
The following comments were generated from the submission relating to
a master plan approval for Citrus Glen, Phase II:
1. Landscaping for all common areas must be reviewed and approved
at the Community Appearance Board. These plans are required
to be submitted along with the preliminary plat documents for
City review. All common areas and landscaped areas in the
right-of-way must be fully sprinkled.
2. Sidewalks are required along both sides of the proposed local
access road.
3. All trees are required to be a m~n~mum of eight (8) feet in
height at the time of planting.
4. The survey indicates that existing overhead power lines encroach
on proposed lots in both Phase I and II. This condition should
be resolved and proper easements dedicated prior to preliminary
plat submittal.
5. Demolition permits are required for the removal of any structures
on the site.
DO~~J,~
DJ:bh
XC: E. E. Howell
R ""rr'l'i"V
lH ..: .'. ",
""', ,- ,_ t.
L.1LJ .<...:' JJ._.:.,' _
MEMORANDUM
OCT 9c; 198-!
PLAl\ IJ,. ...;, _'
TO: Carmen Annunziato
Planning Director
FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan
Forester/Horticulturist
DATE: October 23, 1987
SUBJECT: Citrus Glen Phase I
Citrus Glen P.U.D. (Phase II)
Lawrence Lake P.U.D.
The following comments pertain to the Master Landscape
Plan for the above projects:
I.
The developer should provide a more accurate tree
survey in conjunction with the aerial photograph
which addresses:
a. All species and quantities of existing tree.
b. Which trees will remain, be transplanted,
removed and replaced.
c. Which trees will be available to the City of
Boynton Beach and/or the School Board of Palm
Beach County.
d. A comprehensive Tree Management Plan for the
tract.
2.
The littoral zone plantings around the lakes
should also address the following:
a. A littoral zone Management Plan document
detailing how to correctly manage this area.
b. A detail sketch of the littoral zone
plantings, showing how the materials will be
installed (species, locations, quantities).
This should be for field inspection when lake
plantings are completed.
c. This document should be referenced in the
Homeowner Association documents and comments
made to this effect on the approved plat.
d. All TREES so designated in the landscape plan
must be 8' in height at time of planting.
e. The installation of the littoral zone
plantings should be completed as the
particular lakes in question are complete and
graded.
3. If any existing Citrus Trees are to remain or
transplanted to common areas in the P.U.D., a
special Tree Management Plan for these trees
should be compiled and also become part of
the Homeowner Association documents.
Referenced also on the plat.
4. A landscape buffer required between any
P.ll.D. and an adjacent road R.O.W. where
applicable should be included in the plan.
-~ -'9<.~/p:'~tl~./
evin ~ a lahan .
KJH:ad
DOC: CANNUN
MEMORANDUM
october 22, 1987
TO: TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD
John Guidry, Utilities Director
Bob Eichorst, Public Works
Charles Frederick, Recreation and Parks Director
Ann Toney, Asst. to the City Manager
James Rhoden, Fire Chief
Bud Howell, Building Official
Lt. Dale Hammack, Police Department
Tom Clark, City Engineer
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Horticulturist
Don Jaeger, Chief Inspector, Building Dept.
FROM: JAMES J. GOLDEN, SENIOR CITY PLANNER
RE: SPECIAL MEETING OF THE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD
Please be advised that on Thursday, November 12, 1987, at 9:00
a.m., there will be a special meeting of the Technical Review
Board to hold pre-hearing conferences for the following requests:
~
Citrus Glen Phase II Addition PUD
2.
Citrus Glen Phase I PUD Master Plan Modification (changes
to the original master plan to incorporate the addition
of Phase II).
3.
Lawrence Lake PUD
4.
Via Lago PCD
All of the revised plans and supporting documents will either be
distributed prior to the meeting or will be available for
inspection at the time of the meeting.
"
Ji J c,.! I
~_ , /. ~//-1--t.~ti,vL
J ' ES J., GOLDEN
JJG:ro
Attachment
cc City Manager
John Wildner
William Cavanaugh
Davie Crockett
MEMORANDUM
October 20, 1987
TO: BETTY BORONI, CITY CLERK
FROM: JAMES J. GOLDEN, SENIOR CITY PLANNER
RE: NEWSPAPER ADVERTISEMENTS FOR
LAND USE AMENDMENT APPLICATIONS
Accompanying this memorandum you will find newspaper
advertisements for the four land use amendment requests submitted
to the Planning Department on the October I, 1987 deadline.
There are separate ads for the Via Lago request and the three
contiguous requests located on the east side of Lawrence Road.
With respect to the Lawrence Road applications, two of the three
requests have previouSly been forwarded to your office (Citrus
Glen Phase II and Lawrence Lake). The school Board application
has not yet been forwarded, as there are several outstanding items
which must be submitted before the request can be transmitted.
The procedure for advertising these requests is outlined in the
October II, 1987 memorandum from the planning Director to the
City Manager, a copy of which should be in your possession. The
relevant schedule within this memorandum is entitled t1Schedule of
Public P~arings and Advertisements for Requests and Changes in
the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element and Rezoning.1I
In addition to the above, please note that the three Lawrence
Road applications are also Annexation applications and should be
advertised for four consecutive weeks, consistent with Chapter
171.044, Florida Statutes. '
The attached advertisements are to be used for both the
notification to the 'surrOunding property owners and for the
newspaper advertisements. The newspaper advertisements are
placed in the t1Local Newstl section of the Palm Beach Post.
w9uld be permissible for the newspaper to retype these
advertisements, provided that the headlines are no less
eighteen (18) point letter size, and the advertisements
not less than one-quarter (1/4) of a standard newspaper
to be
It
than
occupy
page.
~ Jy- ~{~L '-_
ErAMES J .(/GOLDEN
JJG:ro
M E M 0 RAN DUM
October 19, 1987
TO: ALL DEPARTMENT HEADS
FROM: CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
RE: CITRUS GLEN PHASE II
Accompanying this memorandum you will find a Departmental Review
Form which must be completed in order to provide the information
required as part of the Commission's annexation policy. Also
attached is a location map for the property requested to be
annexed.
Please complete this form and return it to me by Friday, November
6, 1987 for inclusion in the public hearing proceedings.
~~-s. -ANNUCirATOr~
CSA:ro
Attachments
cc Central File
MEMORANDUM
October 13, 1987
TO: RAYMOND REA, CITY ATTORNEY
FROM: JAMES J. GOLDEN, SENIOR CITY PLANNER
RE: CITRUS GLEN PHASE II ADDITION PUD
LAWRENCE LAKE PUD
VIA LAGO PCD (FORMERLY BOYNTON BEACH VILLAGE CENTER)
Accompanying this memorandum you will find documents related to
the above-referenced requests for annexation/land use amendment
and rezoning.
Please review the legal documentation for these projects and
provide our office with a written determination as to whether or
not they meet the requirements for unified control, as outlined
in Section 6 of Appendix B, Planned Unit Developments and Section
6-F(3) of Appendix A, Zoning, of the Code of Ordinances
respectively.
If possible, please respond by Nnvember 13, 1987, as these
projects are tentatively scheduled for public hearings on
December 10th and 17th.
.'
,
J~v--= I. /~L~
J.AMES J.J.. GOLDEN
JJG:ro
Attachments
cc
Central File
MEMORANDUM
October 12, 1987
TO: TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD
John Guidry, Utilities Director
Bob Eichorst, Public Works
Charles Frederick, Recreation and Parks Director
Ann Toney, Asst. to the City Manager
James Rhoden, Fire Chief
Bud Howell, Building Official
Lt. Dale Hammack, police Department
Tom Clark, City Engineer
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Horticulturist
Don Jaeger, Chief Inspector
FROM: JAMES J. GOLDEN, SENIOR CITY PLANNER
RE: SPECIAL MEETING OF THE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD
Please be adviseq that on Thursday, October 22, 1987 at 9:00
a.m., there will be a special meeting of the Technical Review
Board to discuss the following master plans:
~.
Citrus Glen Phase II Addition PUD.
2.
Citrus Glen Phase I PUD Master Plan Modification (changes
to the original master plan to incorporate the addition
of Phase II).
Lawrence Lake PUD.
3.
4.
Via Lago PCD (formerly Boynton Beach Village center). .
The above master plans accompanied the land use amendment
applications submitted to the Planning Department on the October
1, 1987 deadline. If approved by the City Commission, these
projects must be forwarded to the State for a consistency review
with the State's comprehensive plan.
.'
- Plans for the above requests accompany this memorandum, with the
exception of Via Lago, which will be distributed separately in
the near future.
All plans and supporting documents are available in the Planning
Department for your review prior to the meeting.
I~~ i / ~~ l~L,
JAMES J. ,/GOLDEN
,I
JJG:ro
j;PP+ T+o)fs
LkS fkLJtJrS r/JtKF/t:A/O~.s ;::
Pf(. LoVE fRoSf5CT
I'
---.. .--. ~- , =...-
---
M E M 0 RAN DUM
October 6, 1987
TO: BETTY BORONI, CITY CLERK
FROM: JAMES J. GOLDEN, SENIOR CITY PLAm~ER
RE: CITRUS GLEN PHASE II ADDITION PUD
LAWRENCE LAKE PUD
Accompanying this memorandum you will find copies of applications
and documents related to the requests for Annexation, Amendment
to the Future Land Use "Element of the Comprehensive Plan and
Rezoning submitted by Michael D. Gordon and Enrico Rossi, agents
for Intracoastal Development, Inc., applicant. The application
fees submitted to the Planning Department for these requests have
been forwarded to the Finance Department for processing.
The public hearing dates for the above requests have been
tentatively scheduled for December 10th and 17th, pending
approval by the Planning and Zoning Board and City Commission
respectively. Legal advertisements, including a map, are
currently being prepared by the Planning Department and will be
forwarded to your office upon completion.
-J;;; j-~
ES JI. GOLDEN
JJG:ro
Attachments
.l? :r)
"'~'i!i,. '
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
'. ~~p~
( . "'.;'
. "::,~
TO:
ALL DEPARTHENTS
PI...
~ -,
HERE] N'--~_
~.
'-~
,'"
RE:
ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DES('RIBED
Please evaluate the initial impact that the ilnnexation of property
described herein will have on your department,.
t/ Citrus Glen-phdse II Addit ion
Name of Developmen Owner --Be-ynton -Nu-rSHr ie5~--------'----------
Area of Subject Property 1 ,7SS:~99.2
Estimated Present Population -0-
S(l. Ft. or _2S. 87
acres
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units
-0-
Existing Use ----.Tre_e. Nursury
Proposed Use__p_uo__~.iL-1UI=4 ~~Qnsistincr oflQ6__ sin.glc- LaJ11il-y___ ___n_
H~~J-acJ1ed zero lot line uni ts~___
Would your Department need to increase the number of per:.onnel as a
resul t of this annexation? Yes No XX
--..----- -~-~--_.. ----
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a result of
this annexation? Yes No XX
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
Conunents:
(Attach if insufficient space.)
~
City Clerk
Finance Ci ~~y Engineer
Building Official
Planning
Police
Utilities
Fire
~
Public Works,
Library
PC1sonnel and
PU1chasing
l'alks & Recreation
Energy
Date ProcesSing
Please return this form to the city Planner'r; Office aB ~oon as possible.
Attachment: Location Map
~~~- -~
r
---.
~
lllP!\Fn (!IENT AL I,EV I nJ F o [U'j
TO: ALL DEPARTl.mN'I'S
RE: ANNJ:XNrION OF PROPERTY AS GEN1-:RALLY Dr:~;CRJ 1<ED HEREIN
Please eVill uate the initial impact that the ann\'xation of property
described herein wi] 1 have on your (leparl mcnt.
Ci trus Glc'n-Phas\, II Addi tion
Name of Development/Owner --BG7"Jl LOB----N\IF5\lri€~: _________________
Area of subject PropertY~253y3~
Estimated Present Population -0-
~; g . Ft. or -----2..8 . 8 ?
acres
Estimdted Number of Existing HC1using Un.its
_-=1) -
Exist ing Use _'l'rec.~1\jULSllry
F r opo ~~ ed Use __EJl D__W LL U 1= 4 _,j)~Q 11 : ~Ls tin g___\) f_l O()~n.c]l e - famil-y-.
__ ___~eti!cJ:}~d zero lot 1: il}~ UBi ts.
Would your Department need to incrc.1se the llumb,'r of personnel as a
result of this annexation? Yes ~t)'J",~1~ No_
Estimated number of addi tional per~:onnel requir'_'d: ~~Ut-<v~ ... J
h'ould YOUl- Department need to incn'dse expendi blres as a resul t of
t0is annexation? Yes ~ No
Estimated annual increase in salaricd:_ ~~.-...O
operat.ing & maintenance:
capital outlay:__
"
... ,
Comments: ~~""':c.:'~'"tQ.. "'D ",~~_~_J- ~. .3~
~ ~ -~. ~ <; \sw-.:r .... :rr:: ... ~~, qQ e->.t.
_J ~o..-G,~~ ~~=
- /~ (Attach .if
~r~~
~_:~~~
insufficient space.)
city Clerk
Fin;lnce
City Engineer
Planning
police
Building Official
Public Works
Lilq-ary
v
Personnel and
Purchasing
Parks & Recreation
utilities
Fi! c~
#
Energy
Dat e Proces~~ing
Please return this f o rill to the Ci t~' Planher I s Or fice as soon as possible.
Attachment: Location Map
lH~P ARi (/iENT AL I\[V J EH r-UfU'1
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
RE: ANNEXATION OF }'HOPERTY AS GEN1':RALLY DE~;CR I BED HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the aDllcxation of property
oescrib..d herein wi] 1 have on your (1epall mellt.
I /0 Ci tl"tl. s GI( ']1- J>hac;(' I I Addi tion
Name of Deve oplllent wner .
~n Lon-N II r su l.'-3:P:]------------------
,qrea of Subject PropertY~uf--~ 39~--2
~;q. Ft. or _28_B2-
acres
Estimated Present Population
..~
Estimated Number of Existing HlHlsing Uni ts -0-:-
Existing use_Trec.-NuLS.llG__
Proposed Use ~lJD_wL~U:r=4 . 0 con:; istill~of_l (~...Ln.g:le-fgJDily-.---.----
d(,tached zero lot line unj t.e...
Would your Department need to incH.'dse the numh2r of personnel as a
result of this annexation? Yes No V
-~---- --.----.---
Estimated number of additional personnel requiled:
Would your Department need to incrc;lse eypelldi t ures as
this annexation? Ye~;
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
a result of
No v"
V
()
()
Corrunents:
(Attach if insufficient space.)
city Clerk
Fin.ince
City Engineer
Building Official
~
Planning
police
Public WOlks
Library
Personnel and
Purchasing
Parks & Recreation
utilities
File
-
Energy
Dat e Pro(:es~; in9
Please return this f onn to the City plamler I s Office as soon as possible.
Attachment:
Location r-1ap
DlPARTflE NT r~L f~EV] EH FORj'1
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
RE: ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCR] liED HEREIN
please evaluate the initial impact that the ann.'xation of property
described herein wi] 1 h:ive on your department.
1 / Ci t rus Glen-Phas(, II Addi tion
Name of Deve opment Owner_Boyn-tOR--N-U-rS-U-r-i-e11 ________________
Area of Subject Property_~25S ,339.2
Sq.Ft:. or___28 8?
acres
Estimated Present population
-0-
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Uni ts _~__
Existing Use --T~-ee__Nur.sllrY--
Propo s ed Use _EV!)~/LU I = ~~( )n~ i s t :in~.Q:L-.l () 6_5 i D g le-=-_f arni4-___ _
__-.9('ct.9C)1_~Lz_ero -.lot line 1Jn~ ts '-
\~ould your Depar~m~n~ ~e~d' t~ ~n~I-~a~e' t~e' n~m:x'~ ~f' p~r~onnel <
result of this annexation? Yes No ~ a
Estima ted number of addi tional pel-sonnel requirl 'd:
Would your Department need to inuease expendit"re~--::a res~
this annexation? Yes No .
-- ---
Estimated annual increase in salalied:
operating & mainten,lnce:
capital outlay:
Corrunents:
(Attach if
insu~nt.space.)
YCi ty Englneer
City Clerk
Finance
Planning
p(~lice
Building Official
Utilities
Fire
1#
Personnel and
Purchasing
Parks & Recreation
Public WOl"ks
Library
Energy
D.lte Processing
Please return this form to the city Planner's Office as soon as possible.
Attachment: Location Map
~,.~::....;;.~_. -- :---- -----
DEPART I.'IENT AL f{EV JEW f=ORj\1
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
RE: ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRJPED HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the ann.'xation of property
described herein will have on your department.
1 / Ci trus Glen-Pl1aSl'. II Addi tion
Name of Deve opnlont owner--BGyn-t-e-R-Nurs-ur-ie:;-_______
Area of Subject PropertY~.,255 ,399.2 Sq. Ft:. or_-28_82 acres
Estimated Present population
___-::ll-
Estima ted Number of Exi sting !lousing Uni ts __----=lL-
Existing Use _Tree~T'{u.rs..ur~ _
Proposed use.-.---EUp wjLUI=4. 0 con?istin_9-_of_-1()6_sLI1g.l~-_faIlliJs_-_-------
d0_tach_~d zero lot__l ine_uni ts '_
Would your Department need to incl case the numrx'r of personnel 95 a
result of this annexation? Yes No ~
N/i--------
Estimated number of addi tional pel'sonnel requir\'d:
\vould your Department need to increase expendi tllres as
this annexation? Yes
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & rnainten~nce:
capital outlay:
a result..J<>f
No Y
- 0-
Cements:
(Attach if insufficient space.)
/
City Engineer
City Clerk
Finance
Building Official
Planning
Pc,} ice
utilities
Fj 1-e
1#
Personnel and
Purchasing
Parks & Recreation
Public WOlks-
Library
Energy
Ddte Processing
Please r{-turn th~s form to the city Planner's Office as soon as possible.
Attachment: Location Map
~".~_..- -.- - -- ---
]ll~PARTnun AL REV I EH fORflj
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
RE: ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the anJlcxation of property
described herein will have on your department.
/ citrus Glen-Phase II Addition
Name of Development. Owner... BGp.t-0R--Nur.su-F-:i-c':-; .____
Area of Subject Prl'pertY_~+255---3-9~__sq. Ft. or__28 8?
Estimated Present population -0-
acres
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units
-0-
Existing Use __TLec Nur..sJlr~
P rope s ed Use --E..!dJ2..-W/ LQI = 4 .p_. con s i.s t :Ln9.._o-LJ (1n~i~i..n gle ~am i l~_____ _
detad1ed zerQJ...9_~_lin~uni ts.
Would your Department need to increase the numl...."'r of personnel
resul t of this annexati on? Ye~; No X
as a
Estimated number of auditional personnel requiled:
Would your Department Jleed to increase expenditures as a result of
this annexation? Ye~~ No X
Estimated annual incre~se in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
Cormnents:
The Building Department does not anticipate any immediate effect on personnel
or expenditure requirements due to this proposed annexation.
(Attach ~f insufficient space.)
City Clerk
Finance
City Engineer
/'
V
Building Official
Planning
Police
Utilities
Fire
-
Personnel and
Purchasing
Parks & Recreation
Public Works
Library
Energy
Date processinq
Please return this forn\ to the City Planner's Office as soon as possible.
Attachment:
Location f',ap
~~-
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
RE: ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Citrus Glen-Phase II Addition
Name of Development/Owner Boynton Nurcurico
Area of Subject Property 1 ,2SS,~qq_2 Sq.Ft. or ?8 8? acres
Estimated Present Population -0-
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units -0-
Existing Use Tree Nursury
Proposed Use PUD w/LUI=4.0 consisting of 106 single-family
detached zero lot line units.
Would your Department need to increase the number of personnel as a
result of this annexation? Yes No
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a result of
this annexation? Yes No
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
Comments:
(Attach if insufficient space.)
City Engineer
City Clerk
Finance
Building Official
Planning
Police
utilities
Fire
-
Personnel and
Purchasing
Parks & Recreation
Library
publ ic Works.
Energy
Date Processing
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possible.
Attachment: Location Map
COMMENTS ON ANNEXATION
MUNICIPAL STAFF
INCREASED INCREASED
DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL CAPITAL COMMENTS
Planning No No See attached
Forester No No See attached
Building No No See attached
Police No No None
City Clerk No No None
City Engineer No No See attached
Parks and Possible Yes See attached
Recreation
Utilities No No See attached
City Attorney See attached
PALM BEACH COUNTY STAFF
Planning, Zoning
and Building
t,
See attached
Traffic Engineering
See attached
COMMENTS ON ANNEXATION
MUNICIPl\L STAFF
INCREASED INCREASED
DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL CAPITAL COMME1~~:::
Planning No No See at tac t: .:.;:;.
Forec::t::pr Nn No See attac:-..2d
Building No No See attache:i
Police No No None
City Clerk No No None
City Engineer No No See attached
Parks and Possible Yes See attached
Recreation
Utilities No No See attac.hed
City Attorney See attached
PALM BEACH COUNTY STAFF
Planning, Zoning
and Building
"
See attached
Traffic Engineering
See attached
Building:
Parks and
Recreation:
BOYNTON BEACH STAFF COMMENTS
The Building Department does not anticipate any
immediate effect on personnel or expenditure
requirements due to this proposed annexation.
Anticipate development of a five (5) acre
ci ty I'~l:"l~ t8 service Citrus Glen phases
I and II as well as Lawrence Lake and
Lawrence Groves.
t,