CORRESPONDENCE
,
I ~
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO.
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & zoning
~iam Hukill, P.E., City Engineer
May 31, 1995
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
KNUTH ROAD - FUNDING
My understanding of the recent time extensions granted for the Tara
Oaks PUD and Knuth Road PCD is that the Commission conditioned
approvals on construction (by the applicants) of Knuth Road in it's
entirety from Woolbright Road to Boynton Beach Boulevard. Further,
that without Knuth Road completion commitments the extensions could
have failed.
The draft resolution you showed me today in effect funds the Knuth
Road construction out of public funds (impact fee credits) which I
do not believe was the intention of the Commission.
My feeling about it is that the PUD and PCD should not be built
without meeting concurrency (in this case construction of Knuth
Road) first. To the best of my knowledge Knuth Road is not on the
County Road Schedule and unless the developers build it, the PUD
and PCD do not meet concurrency. They should build the road, just
as they agreed to do in order to receive an extension. If they can
work out an arrangement with Palm Beach County to front the cost
now and recover later when the County would have normally scheduled
construction anyway, more power to them. But using impact fee
credits to "buy" time extensions is not good public policy.
The bottom line is that I am opposed to the resolution. At a
minimum, the sixth "whereas" should be removed or the word "not"
deleted, and "either" changed to "both", and "or" changed to "and".
WVH/ck
C:KNUTHRD
xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager
James Cherof, City Attorney
KllcI8y & AaocIM_
Landscape Architectsl Planners
1561 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(407) 689-5522 · Fax: (407) 689-2592
January 24, 1995
Ms. Tambri Heyden, Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach Planning & Zoning Department
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
Re: Impact Fee Credits for the Construction of Knuth Road
Our Project No.: 799.16
Dear Ms. Heyden,
As you are aware, my client, Mr. Bill Winchester, is responsible for the construction of
Knuth Road as part of the Conditions of Approval for the two Planned Commercial
Developments and one Planned Unit Development which are currently being considered
for Time Extensions. Since the projects have been approved, there has been an
assumption that the costs incurred with regard to the construction of this road would be
credited against Palm Beach County Traffic Impact Fees. Because Knuth Road is a
collector road designated on the City's Comprehensive Plan, the value of the construction
of Knuth Road is more resident serving than project serving.
In reviewing our files, it appears that the issue of impact fee credit has never been finally
coordinated with Palm Beach County. I am attaching a letter written by Mr. Chris Cutro
on May 28, 1992 to Mr. Haney Frakes. It is my understanding that our County staff is
prepared to recommend approval of the impact fee credits, but a resolution requesting
such credits needs to be adopted by the City Council. Attached you will find a draft
resolution which was prepared by my office to assist Mr. Cutro at the time he was
pursuing this matter. As you are aware, Mr. Cutro left the City without this matter being
finally resolved. As far as I know, this resolution has not been reviewed by your City
Attorney or presented to the City Council for their approval. At this time, assuming that
the City Council approves the extensions for these projects, it seems appropriate to also
resolve this issue. By getting this issue resolved now, there should be no additional
delays in moving these projects forward within the time period allowed by the extension.
If I can be of any assistance in this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me.
~m ffi :: ~ 1:95 ffi lill\
Kieran J. Kilday
Kilday & Associates, Inc.
PLANNING AND
ZONING OEPT.
QClie City of
'Boyn1;on ~eac.1i
~
@ zoo ~ ~"!fOI'-~<:lIau&.~
.. ~ !P.o. !2r~.!1Z0
.' - '<~'- ."1 ~oyn-~~ .s'",z.S-o.J1Z0
" '. .. o.,!HaIL (407) ~7S-6000
'!FJ'UC: (407)- ~7.s..-o
FAcsrMX~S TRANSMISSION
FAX NO.
~ C~c=>o _..~
&t.l J -.::;- ~ / .A--..os. Z ~~ ~.....-.J
,
3CJ.S" - ?? / - Y"9'd2--.3
TO,
FROM:
DATS:
C: E'A.X.TR.AHS. r:rb
~........:)
'''--H-i'''.!Sa I ~ A ~ii?~cc>L-_(.A.. 'f7 &>^--' ,-~-.,-- t-+A--=-
.-e:.~ ~ ~ i I :e::c::::> By JLt ~y 4' ~-""Sc!?'c.,
a;Z......-.~LL--= ~--'--l "'-.J ~ r:~~ ~ ~L." ~+-?~~-=:r- ~~ ~
1l'..4 P'~-r- ~ ~oe-~ 1...,- ~ IS-- ~"-' L.A- ~ i=2-.o ~t:::::o FT:?~
bJ fi&1b..c ~ -r7'........ <<:;.~~ r.-. --.... .- I ~..s-" ,e::TlA.. J )..A -~ A. J c:::;;,. -
~Aocs'l!!!. ~1 E"!:t--.J Cc9'"-'.......-e:.~ ~r::> ~c:..,2_-c>' "-' ~
lA.!lrT+-f- ~_ ....c::::> 'P,-,--r- t-r- I "'-i-r-.c:> o~ lC?:e~o Fib~.A-r::.
OF p......aES :t:NCLt.1D:I:NO THXS COVER SHJll."X' 2-
~~~
,,-
~enLl
JllJ!: :
NUMBER
.:zL~ri.c.A 's q~",-r.va.!I ~c t:.fU. t;;;u.lfst:reo:uro
TRANSMISSION REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT
WAS SENT
(REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE)
** COUNT **
# 2
*** SEND ***
IN
r-;r
L-.L.....
01 REMOTE STATION r. D. START TIME DURATION #PAGES COMMENT I
1 ! JOSIAS & GOREN. P. A. 5-30-95 3:52PM 1 ' 15" 2 I
---
TOTAL
0:01 '15"
2
XEROX TELECOPIER 7020
l'
lilel~ie.*
I
I
I
JRN-10- ''35 TUE 09: (B ID: V I U)fl'r' 0' RS~;((
TEL t~:407-6a9-2592
l:i288 P02
r
'--"
v
IIDm&~'ii'i
PROPOSED RESOLUTION
WBBRBAS the Boyncon Bea.ch Comprehensive Plan, Ordinanoe 89-39,
iden~ific8 Knu~h Road ae a City Colleotor (Exhibi~ A), and
WHDREAS the City of BOfnton Beaeh haa obtained and proe.c~.d ~h.
Right-of.'WClY for Knuth Road b.1.'J part of it!! ~dopted ThorQughfare
plan, and
WHEREAS Rnuth Ro~d p~ovidee a critical North/South alternative to
Congrel.'Js Avenue between Woolb~ight Road and Old Boynton Ro.~, and
Wfi:f;REAS the City of Boynton :5cCl~h hd~ approved Knuth !\oa.d FeD
(Ordinance 090-70) and TaT.Cl Oake FUD (Ordinance 090-75) which both
front on Knuth Road, ana
WHEREAS the C1t~ of Boynton Beach has required the petitioners of
Knuth Road peD and Tara Oaks PCD to construct the missing link ot
Knuth Road between Boynton B8&oh Boulevard and woolDrlght Road, and
WHEREAS :.he construction of Knuth Road is not a 8i te related
requirement of either Knuth Road peD or Tara Oaks PUD, and
WHE~EAS the construction of :Knuth Road is considered part of
comple.tion of the major road network of the City of Boynton Beach,
and
WHERBAS the citizens of Boynton Beach a.nd unincorporated Palm Beach
County will benefit from the completed link of Knuth Road between
Woolbright Roa.d and Old Boynton Road, and
WHBRBAS Article 10.1 K.l.g. of the Palm Beach County Unified Land
Development Code provides impact fee credits where construction of
a portion of a major l'oad network is proposed, and
WHEReAS the City of Boynton Bea.ch has determined that the
construction of Knuth Road meets the standards for oredit of road
imp~ct fee~, be it therefore RESOLVED that,
THE City of Boynton Beach request that Palm Beach County make &
findinq that credit for the preparation of plans and construction
~t Knuth Ro&d a8 approved by the City of Boynton Beach and Palm
Be~ch County be granted again8t th~ Road Impact Pe~8 due from Knuth
Road pen and Tara Oak. PUD.
-
-
,I HI'l-lU-' ~ I U::. U':;:I: ~ i iJ; r:. J LiJH'f (~ '-1~~u....
I t:.~ )'~U: YU. (-bl::i'::h::::=~,?':::
j:;.o:;W r'U::J
t~ City of
;r~~ton iBeacn
~"6 ~ Zoni"l'Dtp4Ttmeftt
1 00 $. ~to" 'IeWi '!cuUfIlIrri
:P.O. ~~.HO
1Joynum 'Buuh. jf.,rl.da JJ42S-0.J10
{4Q7) 7J8,7450, 1~'U: (407) iJ8.74SfJ
May ZS, 1992
Kaney FrakeS
AsS1.tant county Enq1neer
palm B85Ch county Bng1neer1nq & Public Works
160 S. AUstral1an Avenue, Airport Hilton Centre
wast PaJ.m Beach, FL 3.3407
RE: Credit for Road Construction in Lieu of Payment of Impact
Fees for Knuth Road (Link between Woolbr1qht Road and
Bounton aeach Boulevard)
Dear Hr. Frakes:
Pursuant to Section 22-25 Exemption and credits seot1on of the
PAI~ SHARt CONrRISUTION FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ORDINANCE, I am
writing to clarify that Knuth Rood, a major collector shown on
the City's Thorouqh!Are Protection Map will be entitled to
r.c.iv~ the creQ1t for Imp~et Feez provided for in the Or~inance.
Att.~hed you will find a copy 0: the a~opted Tho.oughfare Plan
Map for cbc City of ~oynton ~c~ch. Knuth Ro.~ is shown on thlS
map ~~ A oolloctor f~c~lity t.om Woolbright Roa~ northerly to the
Boynton eeach Hall. Add1t1onally, ~otb the City and the county
approved new alignments tor the north end of Knuth Road several
years ago to allow tor better utilization of this road as an
alt~rnat1ve nortl1/soutn collector serving the Mall. (The new
a:1Qnment prov1de~ for the north terminus of Knuth Road to align
d~rectly with the westerly entrance to the Mall.) The roac1 has
always been envisioned as an alternative to Conqress Avenue which
is at th18 time the only north/south arter1al in the area.
Current~yp a portlon of Knuth Road is constructed south of
!o~~ton Beach Boulevard. In the Past, because Woolbriqht Road
did not ex1st between Conqress Avenue and Military Trail, the
remaining construction of this link was not a prior1ty. However,
now with Woolbri~ht Road open and o~Qra~inq with s1gn1f1oant
traff1ei tbe construction of Knuth Road would olearly be
desirable an~ warranted.
.I:fmerit::a J gate.wa.y to th.e. quIfstream
_nJHrH.0-' 95 TIJE 09; ffi IDac.ILDRY ex RS~:,oC
. . TJ::I...HO: 40'(-b:3'3-~'592
~288 P06
l
....
.
..
Haney rrakas
-z-
MClY Z8, 1992
CUrrently, there are two projects whioh bave received approval
from the City which in addition to having frontaiee on either
Woolbright Ro~d or Boynton Beach Boulevaral also have frontaqes
on Knuth Road, As part of the development approval procQss, the
city wishes to hav~ either one or both of these projects domplete
the missing llnk of Knuth Road. The developers of these parcels
have requested clarification as to whether impact fee credit can
be obtained ~or ~he ~oft~tru~tlon of Knuth Road which is not
dir@ctly rp-l~t.d to the need of the proj~ct purauant to sMct10n
22-25 of ~hQ ~oad Impact rGe ordinan~o. Based upon my reading of
th$ orr:11:n.anc$ and th~ defiuit10n of Ira major road. natwork
Gystem", I Deli_va ~hat Knuth Road should ~lal1fy a5 the major
eol1.~eor road which i8 8nvi~ion.d in this ordinance.
Additionally, bac~us. Knuth Road will provide the f~rst westerly
north/south alterna~ive to conqress Avenue, it should provide
relief afid therefore additional capacity for Congree8 Avenue AG
wall.
I would apprec1ate your ~esponse to this letter. Needless to
say, we expect th~t we woulQ need to meet all of the requ1rements
of :be ordinance With respect to proceaures, cost est1mates, and
scope of constructlon activity. Thank you tor your
eon.1c1.rat1on.
Sincerely,
~~
Chriatopher Cutro, AICP
Plann1no and zon1n; Director
cc:cp
Ene.
A:K11clay
.,t'.....,.",...~.
---r;;;;:'1' \ '.
/ . ),'J/
Jlt,. lflt /(/)
QVU;T, lk:J.{i.f~
IE
Klldey II' Aaoclet..
Landscape Architectsl Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
JWest Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(407) 689-5522 . Fax: (407) 689-2592
April 12, 1995
Ms. Tambri Heyden, Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach Planning & Zoning Department
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
Re: Knuth Road P.C.D. Extension Request, Boynton Beach P.C.D. Extension
Request and Tara Oaks P.U.D. Extension Request
Our Project No.: 799.16
Dear Ms. Heyden,
This letter will serve as several requests. Firstly, on behalf of my clients, I have
been authorized to request an additional thirty (30) day postponement of both the
Knuth Road P.C.D. and the Boynton Beach P.C.D. As indicated in my previous
correspondence of March 16, 1995, my clients have been trying to firm up
development time tables to address the concerns which were raised by the
Planning Commission. They are still in this process and would prefer the
additional thirty (30) days to be in a better position to address these issues before
the City Council.
In the case of the Tara Oaks P.U.D., we do intend to present the matter to the city
Council on Tuesday, April 18, 1995. In this particular case, my clients have
entered into a contract with Pulte Homes who will develop the project. We are
requesting that representatives of Pulte Homes accompany us to the meeting to
better explain their proposal to the Council. In all likelihood, because their
housing type will require modification of the master plan, a master plan
modification request would shortly follow approval of the extension. On Tuesday
night, we can provide the Council with more details regarding their sales program.
However, given the fact that we are anxious to move ahead with the Pulte Homes
I Tara Oaks proposals, I do need to get the impact fee credits issue resolved for
the construction of Knuth Road. You will recall, that I addressed this matter to you
in a separate letter of January 24, 1995, (attached). Sometime ago, both the
County Representatives and City Staff recommended approval of these impact fee
credits. However, in order to facilitate that approval, a resolution must be passed
by the City Council to be submitted to Palm Beach County. Attached you will
Ms. Tambri Heyden
April 12, 1995
Page 2 of 2
find a draft of a resolution that contains the necessary information according to
the County Ordinance. I would request that this matter be on the agenda for
action on Tuesday nights meeting as well as the Tara Oak extension. Resolution
of this issue is a requirement of our contract with Pulte Homes.
Please call me if you have any questions regarding any of these matters.
Sincerely,
-k\'W~ -kcld~
Kieran J. Kilday
Kilday & Associates, Inc.
KJKlcdd\cheyden.412
Attachments
cc: Mike Schroeder; Schroeder & Larche
Carrie Parker, City of Boynton Beach, City Manager
. : i\ APR J 4
. I," L~~_,.._,~
HM.JfJJh!G N~D
ZON!NG DEPT.
. ---"-_.._-~-----~._-----~....._--_.._-------~
..
..........
'"
~
.<;
Kilday & .a..o<'l.tu
Landscape Architects/ Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach. Florida 33401
(407) 689-5522 · Fax: (407) 689-2592
January 24, 1995
Ms. Tambri Heyden, Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach Planning & Zoning Department
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
Re: Impact Fee Credits for the Construction of Knuth Road
Our Project No.: 799.16
Dear Ms. Heyden,
As you are aware, my client, Mr. Bill Winchester, is responsible for the construction of
Knuth Road as part of the Conditions of Approval for the two Planned Commercial
Developments and one Planned Unit Development which are currently being considered
for Time Extensions. Since the projects have been approved, there has been an
assumption that the costs incurred with regard to the construction of this road would be
credited against Palm Beach County Traffic Impact Fees. Because Knuth Road is a
collector road designated on the City's Comprehensive Plan, the value of the construction
of Knuth Road is more resident serving than project serving.
In reviewing our files, it appears that the issue of impact fee credit has never been finally
coordinated with Palm Beach County. I am attaching a letter written by Mr. Chris Cutro
on May 28, 1992 to Mr. Haney Frakes. It is my understanding that our County staff is
prepared to recommend approval of the impact fee credits, but a resolution requesting
such credits needs to be adopted by the City Council. Attached you will find a draft
resolution which was prepared by my office to assist Mr. Cutro at the time he was
pursuing this matter. As you are aware, Mr. Cutro left the City without this matter being
finally resolved. As far as I know, this resolution has not been reviewed by your City
Attorney or presented to the City Council for their approval. At this time, assuming that
the City Council approves the extensions for these projects, it seems appropriate to also
resolve this issue. By getting this issue resolved now, there should be no additional
delays in moving these projects forward within the time period allowed by the extension.
If I can be of any assistance in this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Kieran J. Kilday
Kilday & Associates, Inc.
-
, ,IH"-lU-. ~~ I Lc U~: U:=,' ,<lLLJH.I 0 H~:::,U~
-
'-'
! I::!.,- ..NU: 4l:J(-bl::i~-'-:='~'::
l=IC:i::ll::i t-'U:::'
. .~Cityof
,Y ~ton 1Jeacli
tr
~'\:1 e!r Zoni"'8 '1Jtp4Tt~ftt
100 $. ,."'" 'Iuu/I. t!cukvan(
~.o. ~Jl(l
1J41ynwn 'BUJ&.1tcritla )J-425-0J10
(407) 7J8.7450, 1M: (407) 7J8.7459
May 2S, 1992
Kaney Frakes
ASS1.tan~ county En91neer
palm Beach county Bnq1neer1nq & Public Works
160 S, AUstralian Avenue, Airport H~lton Centre
Wast PaJ.Jll Sea:::h, FL 33407
RE: Credit for Road Construction in Lieu of Payment of Impact
Fees for Knuth Road (Link between Woolbr1qht Road and
Bounton Beach Boulevard)
Dear Hr. Frakes:
Pursuant to Sectlon 22-25 Exemption and credits sect10n ot the
PAI~ SHARt CONTRI5UTION FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ORnXNANCE, I am
writ1ng to clarify that Knuth Road, a major collector shown on
the CitY'e Thorouqhrare Protection Map will be ent~tled to
receiv$ th~ creQ1t for Imp~ct Feez provided for in the Ordinance.
Att.ohed you will find a copy o~ the .~opted Thoroughfare Plan
MaF for ehe City of aoynton ~c~ch. Knuth Roa~ 18 Inown on thiS
map am a col16ctor fAcility !.orn Woolbright Road northerly to the
Boynton Beach Hall, Add1t1onally, ~otn the City anc the county
approved new allqnments tor the north end of Knuth Road several
yaars ago to allow tor better utilization of this road as an
alternative north/souto collector serving the Mall. (The new
allqnment provided for the north terminus of Knuth Road to align
d~rectly with the westerly entrance to the Mall.) The roa~ has
always been envisioned as an alternative to Conqress Avenue which
is at th18 time the only north/south arter1al in the area.
Currently, a portion of Knuth Road is constructed south of
!o}~ton Beach Boulevard. In the past, because Woolbright Road
did not ex1st between Congress Avenue and Military Trail, the
r~m~ininq construction ot th1s link was not a prior1ty. However,
now with Woolbri~ht Road open and oD@ra~inq with significant
trafti~1 the construction of Knuth Road would clearly ~Q
desirable and warranted.
rqmeric.a $ t]ate'i.Vay to tfte. fJu.ifstream
--.,,-
_..JHr~-J.0-'95 TUE 09:05 ' T,ILDRY t~ R:=8JC
'-'"
. . T.I=:b..J~: 407-83'3-::592
;;288 P05
I
-
...
'.
HanlY Frakas
-z-
KelY ZS, 1992
CUrrently, there are two projects which have rec.ived approval
from the city which in addition to h4v1ng frontaqes on either
Woolbriqht Road or Boynton Beach Boul~var4, also have fronta;es
on Knuth Road. A~ part of the development approval process, the
city w1sh~e to have either one or both of these projects eomplete
the missing 11nk cf Knuth Road. The developers of these parcels
have requested clarification as to whether impact fee credit can
be obtained ~or ~he ~onatru~tion of Knuth Road which is not
dir@ctly rp-lat.d to the np-ed of th~ proj~ct purauant to s~ct1on
2~-2S of ~hQ ~oad Impact tee ord1nanco. Based upon my reading of
thlil crd1nancIilI and thy d9finit~on of "a major road network
~Y8tQm", ~ believe :hat Knuth Road should qualify as the major
eoll.e~or road which is ~nvi~ion.d in this Ordinance.
Additionally, bec~uB. Knuth Road will provid. th. f~r&t westerly
north/south alterna~1ve to conqress Avenue, it should provide
relief and therefore edditional capacity for Conqreeg Avenue eu
wall.
I would apprec1ate your response to this letter. Needless to
Say, we expect th~t we woul~ need to meet all of the requ1rements
of :he ordinance Wl~h respect to proce~ure8, cost est1rnates, and
scope of constructlon activity. Thank you for your
con.1c1.rat1on.
Sincerely,
~~
Christopher Cutro, AICP
Planninq and Zoning Director
cc:cp
Ene.
A:K:11di:lY
.,t'~..
,-
JAN-10-' 55 TUE 09: 03 I'" f<I Lmy &~ ASSCiC
TEL hlO: 407-639-2592
*t288 P02
l'
r
'-.
'-'
u
rnIil!~1r1
PROPOSBD RESOLUT10N
WHBRBAS the Boyn'ton Bea.oh Comprehensive planl Ordinanoe 99-39,
idontifieD Knuth Road ao a City C~llootor (Exhibit A), ~nd
WHDRaAS the City of Boynton Beaeh haa obtained and pro~ec~.d ~h.
R1sht-of.'Way fOJ:" :Knuth RQad as part of its adopt",c;1 Thoroughfare
Plan, and
WHEREAS Rnuth Road p~ovideG a critical North/South alternative to
Congrece Avenue between Woolbright Road and Old Boynton ROA~, And
Wfil;REAS tha City of Boynton :Beach hal:t a.pPJ:"oved Knuth :fI.olad PCD
(OJ:"dinallce 090-70) and TaT-a Oake PUD (Ordinance 090-75) which both
front on Knuth Road, and
WHEREAS the City or Boynton Beach has re~ulred the petitioners of
Knuth Road peD and Tara Oaks PCD to construct the missing link ot
Knuth Road between Eoynton Beaeh BOUlevard and woolbright Road, and
WHEREAS ':.he construction of Knuth Road is not a site related
requirement of either Knuth Road peD or Tara Oaks PUD, and
WHEREAS the construction of Knuth Road is considered part of
completion of the major read network of the City of Boynton Beach,
and
WHEREAS the citizens of Boynton Bea.ch and unincorporated Palm Beach
County will benefit fram the completed link of Knuth Road between
Woolbright Road and Old Boynton Road, and
WHBRBAS Article 10.1 K~l.g. of the Palm Beach County Unified Land
Development Code provides impact fee credits where constructIon of
a portion of a major road network is propoeed, and
WHERBAS the City of Boynton Beach has determined that the
construction of Knuth Road meets the standards for oredit of road
imp~ct fees, be it therefore RESOLVED that,
THB City of Boynton Beach request that Palm Beach County make a
findinq that credit for the preparation of plans and construction
~t Knuth Road as approved by the City of Boynton Beach and Palm
Be~ch County be gr~nt8d again8t the RQad Impact ~ee8 due from Xnuth
Road pen and Tara Oake PUDa
~
,.' \L /' CtP
f ~
Klldey & Auoclet..
Landscape Architects/ Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(4071 689-5522 · Fax: (4071 689-2592
March 16, 1995
Ms. Tambri Heyden, Director
City of Boynton Beach Planning & Zoning Department
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
RE: Tara Oaks P,U.D., Knuth Road P.C.D., Boynton Beach Boulevard P.C.D.
OUR PROJECT NO.: 799,16
Dear Ms. Heyden,
This letter will serve as a request to postpone consideration of the above three (3)
extension requests for a period of thirty (30) days until the City Commission
Meeting of April 18, 1995. We are requesting this postponement in order to
properly assess the effects of the Zoning Commissions recommendations
regarding these projects assuming they are adopted by the City Council.
At the Zoning Commission Meeting, it seemed apparent that the Commissioners
wished to have better reassurance that these projects will in fact move forward to
develop if time extensions are granted, As there are ongoing discussions
regarding the development of all of the properties at this time, we feel that during
the additional thirty (30) days we can try to solidify time tables for development
so we can better address this issue at the City Council Meeting.
Additionally, we will use this time to assess the effect of a denial of these petitions
including such issues as the status of previous dedications of right-of-way which
resulted from the previous approvals. With regard to these issues, our attorney
wishes adequate time to meet with the City Attorney and discuss the ramifications
which would result from the City Council's adopting the recommendations of the
Zoning Commission.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
...../'"
cc: Mike Schroeder
KJKlcdd\cheyden.316
_ Board-of County Commissioners
Ken L. 'Foster, Chairman
Burt Aaronson, Vice Chairman
Karen T. Marcus
Carol A. Roberts
Warren H. Newell
Mary McCarty
Maude Ford Lee
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
March 7, 1995
Mr. Mike Haag
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD P.C.D.
KNUTH ROAD p.e.D.
TARA OAKS P.U.D.
Dear Mr. Haag:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has traffic reviewed the three traffic
analyses prepared by Simmons & White for these three proposed developments. The
three studies are updates to the K. S. Rogers traffic studies prepared in 1990.
They use the trip generation and trip distribution from the K. S. Rogers studies
and update the existing traffic volumes (1994) and the future traffic (1997)
volumes. These traffic studies do not address traffic on Gateway Boulevard for
the two P. C. D. s, as woul d be requi red by the exi st i ng Traffi c Performance
Standards (TPS). A letter received yesterday from Simmons & White provides some
of the requested additional information for Gateway Boulevard.
Bovnton Beach Boulevard P.C.D.
The updated traffic study addresses 120,000 square feet of general retail. The
traffic study states that it address 110,375 square feet of general retail, and
outparcels consisting of a 5,625 square foot bank with drive-through, and a 4,000
square foot high-turnov.er restaurant. The outparcels are high traffic generators
and the traffic study does not properly address the outparcel uses.
The 120,000 square feet of retail will generate 4,818 net daily trips with a
build-out of 1997. The study shows that the project will meet the requirements
of TPS on all roadways except Gateway Boulevard. Gateway Boulevard restricts the
development to 75,700 square feet of general retail (3,361 daily trips) until it
is widened to six-lanes in FY 96/97.
Knuth Road P.C.D.
The updated traffic study addresses a 120,000 square foot shopping center which
includes 110,375 square feet of general retail and outparcels consisting a 4,500
square foot bank with drive-through, and service station with a 2,000 square foot
convenience store, and a car wash. The project will generate 6,221 net daily
trips with a build-out of 1997. The study shows that the project will meet the
requirements of TPS on all roadways except Gateway Boulevard. Gateway Boulevard
"An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action EmploYl'rq
@ printed on recycled paper
Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1229 (407) 684-4000
March 7, 1995
Mr. Mike Haag
BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD P.C.D.
KNUTH ROAD P.C.D.
TARA OAKS P.U.D.
page two
restricts the development to 75,700 square feet of general retail (3,361 daily
trips) until it is widened to six-lanes in FY 96/97.
Tara Oaks P.U.D.
The updated traffic study discusses a project consisting of 192 multi-family
dwell;ng '.mits and a 20,000 square foot church. This project would generate
1,498 daily trips. The study mentions an unidentified previous petition which
accounts for 770 of the projects daily trips. Like the K. S. Rogers study, the
updated study does not address these trips. Rather, it addresses 728 daily trips
from an undefined project. The updated study shows that this undefined project
meets TPS on all roadways, based on a build-out of 1997.
In your letter dated January 20, 1995, you requested verification that the
roadway improvements listed in the Simmons & White reports are still applicable.
There is no information in these reports that allows me to verify the need for
those roadway improvements.
I am sorry for the delay in responding to your request. The form of the updated
traffic studies and missing information did not allow a timely review. If you
have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
30-- ')v~
Dan Weisberg, P.E.
Senior Registp.red C;vil Engineer
cc. Rob Rennebaum, P.E., Simmons & White
File: TPS - Mun. - Traffic Study Review
h:\traffic\diw\boyn37
....._ M _, ~_.............,..=_,,,'U'<_ ~ ,..,~ ....<-~- r
r-"'~-'~
f', ~
! i') ~
I f" 1 Fi
: P II
~.JU ~
I
MAR 10
PlANirfNc;7,1:D.. -Qh
ZQ,I'!,I,NQ. DEP,L_", .,\y
Kilday & AaocIetea
Landscape Architectsl Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach. Florida 33401
(407) 689-5522 · Fax: (407) 689-2592
U\VJ~f;
-~~
IL
8 /995 IlJ
March 6, 1995
Ms. Tambri Heyden, Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach Planning & Zoning Department
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPI
Re: Knuth Road P.C.D. and Boynton Beach P,C.D. Time Extensions
Our Project No.: 799.16
Dear Ms. Heyden,
Thank you for meeting with Bill Winchester and myself last week to discuss the
Time Extensions for Boynton Beach P.C.D. and Knuth Road P.C.D. As of this
date, I am still waiting for verification from the County Engineer that phasing for
each of the above projects would only occur after the trips generated by each
project exceeds 3,361 trips per day. This number is the number that was
calculated by our traffic engineer, Mr. Robert Rennebaum, in assigning the 1 %
that is allowed to utilize Gateway Boulevard and working the trips backwards to
the site based upon the assignments contained in the original traffic study.
As you are aware, Mr. Winchester is concerned that this project is being required
to retroactively meet phasing requirements when there are many other projects
in the City of Boynton Beach which have received extensions without any phasing
requirement. For that reason, we are requesting an agreement with the City that
either project be allowed to utilize all or part of the 6,722 total trips that the
projects would be allowed before the requirement of phasing. In other words,
since each project would be permitted to generate 3,361 trips it makes sense that
we be allowed to assign either all or part of the trips to one project as it is likely
that one project will move ahead quicker than the other project.
One additional issue which we discussed at our meeting which we would like to
have resolved at the time of the consideration of the extension request is the fact
that the Knuth Road P.C.D, has an approval on it's Master Plan including a service
station. While we are aware that the service station criteria which was adopted
after this approval would not allow this use at this corner, our ability to proceed
Ms, Tambri Heyden
March 6, 1995
Page 2
using our approved master plan is very important. In all probability, based on
some very recent discussions with users of the Knuth Road P.C.D., we believe
that the service station use will in fact be the first phase of the development of this
center. Additionally, with the construction of the service station, we hope to be
in a position to construct Knuth Road from its current terminus and is southerly
to the canal crossing. (Tara Oaks P.U.D. will continue this construction southerly
to Woolbright Road.)
At this time, we expect the petition to be heard by the Planning Commission on
March 14, 1995. I will make myself available at any time should you wish to
discuss these matters further. I will continue to seek written confirmation from the
County Engineer that the phasing requirement referenced in this letter is in fact
correct.
Kieran J. Kilday
Kilday & Associates, Inc.
CC: Mike Schroeder
Bill Winchester
t1RR-06-'95 MeN 16:04 ID:KIL~Y & ASSOC.
TEL NO:407-589-2592
1:*340 P01
Maroh 6, 198a
-...........
.. - ' ,,-' ", " .. ,; c- '-.1-<" "
. . lanning Olrector
City of Boynton Beech Planning & Zoning Department
100 Eut Boynton Be80h Blvd.
Boynton BMoh, FL ~6
~[U~~fiX:ml
- 6 /995 IJJ}
~~~~WgE~~D
Re: Knuth Road P.C.D. and Boynton Beach P.C.D, Time Extensions
Our PI'OJeet No.: 799.16
D_r Ms. Heyden.
Thank you for meeting with Bill Winchester and mvsatf last week to dlsQuss the
Time Extenalona for Boynton Beach P,C.D. and Knuttl Road P.C.D. M of thl8
date, I am stili waiting for verification from the County Engineer that phasing for
BBClh of the above projects would only occur after the trips generated by eacn
project exceeds 31381 trips per day, Thla number Is the number ht was
calculated by our traffic engineer. Mr. Robert Rennebaum, In assigning 1he 1%
that Is allowed to utilize Gateway Boulevard and WOrl<lng the tr1pa backwards to
the site baNd upon the ucignmenta contained In the original trafflo study.
As you are aware, Mr. Winchester Is conoemed that this project Is b~ng requlreca
to retroactively meet phasing requirements when there are many other projects
In the City of Boynton BBBCh which have received extensions wtthout any phasing
requirement. For that raaoon, wo are requesting an agreement with the City that
either project be allowed to utilize all or part of the 6,722 total trips that the
projects would be allowed betore the requirement of phasing. In other' WOrds,
since each project would be permitted to generate 3.361 tr1ps It makes sense that
we be a!rowed to assign either all or part of the trips to one project as It I. likely
that on. project will move ahead quicker than the other project.
One additlonalluue which we discussed at our meeting which we would like to
have resolvecl at tl'l8 time of the oonslderation of the extension request II the fact
that the Knuth Road P.C,D. has an approval on It'8 Master Plan Including . service
station. While we are aware that the slI'Vlce statton cr1terla which was adopted
after this approval would not allow this use at this comer, our ability to proceed
~-
~^:i~h~
r-g., .~ / _ //., hre.~,
"Jf1 . ... ! ~L~.
t7;~~\~1 /.,'_.
..-jIJ;~ L 1/1'\/ "
,P-'W~ )1L-I/t. :---. '.. -o-'~. ~.if~
1 t/ ." , /'<<._iltA.,' I'-
.a,1-~~~c ~::1;'Iz~-~ '. /r./ "
'fC.j)" ~?--17 L ,:;. ~:1"JL
, CVJt. ~
,.
.J~~ /v
I.. '-"(.1 ~
~/~~
~I A.'
i:J " LXV ~ cvtfdL~
5iA r; /
". {/LC ~'
. L7,?,-c-z-:7) ~,~ " f1~
?,.k_~_ t4~~~.~ f1tD.
_ ~ l'lAR-OS-' ':6 tlC1H 16: 85 ID: 1< I Lffi'y' (~ ASSOC.
TEL tU: 487-589-2592
1:*340 P02
MI. rambrl Heyden
March e. 1 eee;
Page .2
using our approved master plan Is very Important. In all probability, buecl en
some very recent discussions with users of the Knuth Road P.C.O., WIt believe
that the servIce !d:atlon use will In fact be the first phase of the development of this
oenter. Addttlonally I with the construction of the aervlce station, we hope to be
In a position \0 construct Knuth Road from Its current terminus and Is lOutherly
to tt18 canal crossing. (Tara Oaks P,U.D. will comlnue this construction southerly
to WOOlbright Road.)
At this time, we expect the petition to be heard by the Planning Commlulon on
Maroh 14, 1995. I will make mysetf available at any time should you wleh to
discuss these matters further. I will continue to seek wrinen conftrmatlon frgm the
COunty Engineer that 'lhe phaalng rGq ulrement referenced In this letter II In fact
oorreot.
KIeran J. Kilday
Kllday & Aesooiates, Ino.
cc: Mike Schroeder
Bill Wlnaheeter
MAR-07-199S 09:25
" . ~. .. ...----
22~~222222222222
407 478 5770 P.01/03
- County Administrator
Rober! Welsmnn
Ken L Poster, Chairman
Burt Atlronson, Vice Chairman
, I<~fen T. Marcus
Carol A. Roberts
Warren H. Newell
Mary McCOlrty
Maudt~ Ford lee
Deputment of Bnsin'terir\8
.ltnd Pl.lblic: Work.
. -119!1i
m
TELECOPIER TRANSMITTAL COVER SKEET
TRAffIC DIVISION
FAX NUMBER: (407) 478-5770
\'''-' PLAZO NNING AND
. . NING OEPT.
TRANSMITTAL DATE: 1> l., ,~ ~
PLEASE DELIVER THE fOLLOWING TELECOPlfO MATERIAL TO:
RECEIVER'S ~AME:
OFfICE NAME:
r1 (> '"z::..."...Tu <.A..-
/4J t:.~ (;-( .
OFFICE TELEPHONE NUMBER: ( J
OFFICE FAX NUMBER: ( )
S U BJE C1 : r6 t) ~...-c- r '-'.....-.-
kL~~ IIi
(-\1)
3/)~_D09o
f? <::--4'- <... H p, ~ c...- c) ('J <- l)
,r
PC D I 1/tf\.6 dA- ~
c
****~****..*********.****************.****************~************************
SENDER'S NAME: ~.,A./
OFFICE TELEPHONE NUMBER: I \
\A/ ~ {~ P:J e /{J2..
6~Y ~(j=S <J
*******************************************************************************
TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (including this transmittal ~over sneet): ~
YES ( ) . . NO ( 'lr).
PLEASE CALL TO VERIFY RECEIPT ~ATERIAL:
NAME OF FAX OPERATOR: ~
"An Equ<ll OppmIU"il)' - A ffirmilliv.: .-\r:Lit>n Empl"yt'r"
@P;~I#/JM f~"d_(
Box 21229 West P:Jlm BQach, Flori,la 3:!41(j.-1129 1"07) "SJ,-~()OO
?11\~~
uJ- fJlt"
S)f'~ Q "
~~... ?~ tP~.
\ /" 0 Il-,..b~ vfA~
\2.- 1 ,I'< qJ'\'
/p..,(Y' \) .. {.,~~< ~~~ ~\y... #
/\ I tJfP f>'O~ b So ~rtl I
~,)-<<' bP-l1 ~W ~ Rll
11 r.\ b-<- 7 n rP~ ?i ....1.. V':F' - '"
\.Y t..-J:" i" 1 'WG~ ~.....u .j,(\.
~ vJ ~Q' rJ<'\U'
tpf::> ()~H ... ~D ()\l:> tv ~
fit!> ~\l)~ '> ~D'1 ~ ~,.~ ~
cJ:;ft t(.,'v <,fi'. ~ \
b~ -~y .....S-<t' {t-~' -110"'"1> ~'
"'\'P rpJ,VJ \.. ~~ '{.rJ
~ ?A',t; Sf; t ~'\'Jt>\t" tl." V s tJo< ~,'(poI ~
\V jr. ~~\ l/ tfJ>'-\ ~,6 vrl",t~
. ~{LJ ~ Dt.r> lIP ,,$ 6"
~ ~ ~o ~~
~ 'CP ~()\) ~\t5' ~1
~ ~~ vi ~,~
'tp (.. \L' ~ ~D-{
S
t1AR-07-1 99S 09: 27
22.~2222222222222
407 478 5770 P_02/03
county AdminIstrator
Robert Weisman
B<tard of County Commissioners
- Ken L Fost,,!', Chairman
l:lurt Aaronson.. Vice Chail'man
Karen T. Mal'c'lc;
Cilrol A. Roberts
Warren H. Ne'Well
Mal)' McCnrty
.Maude Ford Lec:
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
March 7, 1995
Mr. Mike Haag
C1ty of Boynton Bea~h
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425~0310
RE: BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD P.C.D.
KNUTH ROAD P.C.D.
TARA OAKS P.U.D.
Dear Mr. Haag;
The Palm Beach County Traffic D1v1sion has traffic reviewed the three traffic
ana.lyses prepared by Simmons &. White for these three proposed developments. The
three studies are updates to the K. S. Rogers traffic studies prepared in 1990.
They use the trip generation and trip distr1but1on from the K. S. Rogers studies.
and update the existing traffic volumes (1994) and the future traffic (1997)
volumes. These traffic studies do not address traffic on Gateway Boulevard for
the two P.C.D.s, as would be required by the exist1ng Traffic Performance
Standards (TPS). A letter receivedyesterctay from Simmons & White prov1des some
of the requested additional information for Gateway Boulevard.
~on Beach Boulevard P.C.DL
The updaled L~~rric study addresses 120,000 square fect of general retail. The
traffic study states that the it address 110,375 square feet of general retail
and outparcels consisting of a 5,625 square foot bank with drive-through and a
4.000 square foot high-turnover restaurant. The Qutparcels are high traffiC
generators and the traffic study does not properly address the outparcel uses.
The 120,000 square feet of retail will generate 4,818 net daily trips with a
build-cut of 1997. The study shows that the project will meet the requirements
of TPS on all roadways except Gateway Boulevard. Gateway Boulevard restricts the
d~v~lapment to 75.700 square feet of general retail (3,361 daily trips) until it
is widen~d t.o six-lanes in FY 96/97.
K!!,uth Roa~jl~
The updatQd traffic study addresses a 120,000 square foot shopping center which
includes 110,~75 square feet of general retail and outparcels consisting a 4,500
square foot bank with drive-through and service station with a 2,000 square foot
convQ~iQncQ stor~ and a car wash. The project will generate 6,221 net daily
trips with a build-out of 1997. The study shows that the project will meet the
~Qquir'ilmenh of TPS on all roadways except Gateway Boulevard. Gateway Boulevard
"An Eqll:ll Oppml\m' l}' - A ffirn):\th '" Action r::r~1 p loyel'"
~'l.
IO~ pm,tftD Qn 1'IX)'t'.~.t).; t:<QF1W
1l0:\; 21229 West Palm Be<l(h, Florida 33416.12l9 (407) 6114-40UO
t'IAR-07-1995 09: 27
2?~~2222222222222
407 478 5770 P.~3/03
March 7, 1995
Mr. Mike Haag
BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARDP.C.D.
KNUTH ROAD P.C.D.
TARA OAKS P.U.D.
page two
restricts the development to 75,700 square feet of general reta11 (3,3el da1ly
trips) until it is widened to six-lanes in FY 96/97.
Tara OaKs P. U.....D.
The updated traffic study discusses a project consist1ng of 192 mult1-fam11y
dWelling units and a 20,000 square foot church. Th1s project would generate
1,498 daily trips. The study mentions an unidentified previous petition which
accounts for 770 of the projects daily trips. Like the K. S. Rogers study, the
updated study does not address these trips. Rather, it addresses 728 daily trips
from an undafined project. The updated study shows that this undefined project
meets TPS on all roadways, based on a build-out of 1997.
In your letter dated January 20t 1995~ yaup requested verification that the
roadway irnp:rovements listed in the Simmons! White reports are still applicable.
There is no information in these reports that allows me to verify the need for
those roadway improvements.
I am sorry for the delay in respondin~ to your request. The form of the updated
traffic studies and missing informatlon did not allow a timely review. If you
have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030.
Sincerely,
/
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
~~~
Dan Weisberg. P.E.
Senior Registered Civil Engineer
ce. Rob Rennebaum. P.E., Simmons & White
FilQ: TPS - Mun. - Traffic Study Review
h:\traffic\diw\boyn37
TOTAL P.03
7.D.l
~ TARA OAKS PUD
7.D.2
KNUTH ROAD PCD
7.D.3
BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD PCD
TIME EXTENSION
HANDOUT
Klldey It ANOC....
Landscape Architects/ Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(407) 689-5522 · Fax: (407) 689-2592
~
C~ f 1Z> ~4:'::. : IAQII 0A ~& j>vD
FIe; #. tHf'rt: q'l-cY:> 3
$
C /1lf(!;- 9 '-1- 00 ("
J) Krv..mJ ~y Pc!)
,:.I.C -JJ M fib q'l-DO(;
-1
C/J~ 9~_o")i
3) 8<>'1"'it>oJ &l.JaJ &.10. PCD
1=/4.- /I t'1P(E. 71--t)DI
'1
ep Fe. q '1- on3
February 14, 1995
Mr. Mike Haag, Zoning and Site Development Administrator
City of Boynton Beach Planning & Zoning Department
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
Ae: Tara Oaks PUD, Knuth Road PCD, and Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD
Our Project No.: 799.16
Dear Mr. Haag,
This letter serves as a request for a postponement to the March 14, 1995 Planning
and Development Board Meeting of the aforementioned projects currently being
reviewed for a Time Extension and Concurrency Exemption Certification. These
items are scheduled on tonights February 14, 1995 Planning and Development
Board Meeting, however, the petitioner is requesting this postponement to allow
additional time for their Traffic Engineer to address concerns raised by the Palm
Beach County Traffic Division for these projects. Thank you for your continued
cooperation with this matter.
Should you have any questions regarding this postponement, please feel free to
contact this office.
Sincerely,
.~Q . cJcJZ;;o
Lindsey A. ~alter
Kilday & Associates, Inc.
cc: Bill Winchester
Mike Schroeder
Klldey & Aaocletes
Landscape Architectsl Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(407) 689-5522 · Fax: (407) 689-2592
December 28, 1994
Mr. Mike Haag, Site and Zoning Administrator
City of Boynton Beach Planning & Zoning Department
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
Request for Time Extensions
Tara Oaks P.U.D.
Knuth Road P.C.D.
Boynton Beach Blvd. P.C.D.
Our Project No.: 799.16
Re:
Projects:
Dear Mr. Haag,
Pursuant to our telephone conversation, please find attached three(3) checks each in the amount
of $125.00 payable to the City of Boynton Beach. As discussed, these checks represent filing
fees for requests for time extensions for commencement of development of the above referenced
projects.
It is my understanding that these items are scheduled for the January 10,1995 Technical Review
Committee meeting at 9:00 a.m. It is also my understanding from our conversation, that these
requests will be heard by the City's Planning and Development Board on February 14,1995 and
the City Commission on February 21,1995. If any of this information is incorrect, please contact
me at your earliest convenience.
I will be contacting you next week with regard to the TRC meeting, however, please feel free to
contact me if you have any questions or require further information.
Sincerely,
c:e:~~ ~
Lindsey A. Walter
cc: Michael Schroeder
Bill Winchester
".... ....,. ..,
.. ...
.
...,-"
..:...;.... ;.,,;.,. .,T.
Kilday & Auocle..
Landscape Architectsl Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(407) 689-5522 · Fax: (407) 689-2592
November 23, 1994
Ms. Tambri Heyden, Director
City of Boynton Beach Planning & Zoning Department
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
RE: Request for Time Extensions
PROJECTS: Tara Oaks P.U.D. (Ordinance 90-75)
Knuth P.C.D. (Ordinance 90-70)
Boynton Beach Boulevard P.C.D. (Ordinance 90-73)
Dear Ms. Heyden,
This letter will serve as a formal request to have the City Commission of Boynton Beach
review the status of the above three (3) Planned Developments and to grant further time
extensions for their commencement of development. I have reviewed your Zoning Code
in an effort to determine the proper procedure for extending these project approvals. It
appears that the only process available at this time is contained in Section 9, Article 13,
Time Limitation for Development of Property. In fact, this section was the basis for a
similar review of the Capitol Professional Center PCD (located at the southeast comer
of Knuth Road and Old Boynton Road). In that case, the Commission, after determining
that the existing Planned Commercial Development zoning was the most appropriate
zoning for the property, granted an indefinite time extension. I have attached the staff
report and time extension letter for your review.
./
All three (3) of the above referenced Planned Developments were approved on
December 18, 1990. . Since that time, while there has been some activity concerning
each of the projects, there has not been formal final development plan approval and/or
construction. The original eighteen (18) month time limit of the approvals would have
expired on June 18, 1992. However, on June 16, 1992, the City Commission approved
our request to extend the expiration dates of the three (3) planned developments for one
(1) year until June 17, 1993 (see attached letter from Chris Cutro dated June 29, 1992).
No action or review has taken place since that time. Due to the down swing in the
economy, the property owners have been unable to successfully commence
development which, in this case, is recording of a plat of record for the first phase of
development. However, the property owners have worked continuously on all three
projects since the last extension in an effort to commence development.
m
rn D \VI rn rn
NU/ 2 3 ,.
Ms. Tambri Heyden
November 23, 1994
Page 2
Since the expiration of the time extension on June 18, 1993, the properties have been
in a sort of limbo. If you recall, the two commercial properties were annexed into the
City of Boynton Beach at the same time that they were rezoned. Therefore, the Planned
Commercial Development Zoning District is the only zoning district that has ever been
assigned to them within the City of Boynton Beach. With regard to the Tara Oaks
property, the project was already an existing Planned Unit Development when it was
modified to its current master plan status. Therefore, assuming that the Planned
Development approvals have expired for all three projects, I have no idea what the actual
underlying zoning would be. I believe that is why the provisions of Section 9, Article 13
were provided in the Code. As in the case of the Capitol Professional Center PCD, the
projects clearly need to be revisited by the City Commission to determine whether the
existing zoning is the most appropriate zoning and, assuming that it is, formal action
should be taken regarding the extension of these approvals.
Needless to say, my clients are actively seeking extensions of these approvals. Despite
the economic problems which prevented these projects from moving to the next step in
the development process, there has been activities undertaken throughout the entire
timeframe of the approvals to ready these projects for development. For the purpose of
your analysis regarding the status of these projects, I have prepared a summary of
activities for each project below. Additionally, I will be calling your office to set up a
meeting to review these projects with you and I will be prepared to be present at the time
of their consideration by the City Commission. At this time, I am not aware of any formal
application procedure. However, if there is an application document, we will be ready
to submit it to you promptly.
I. Tara Oaks Planned Unit Development. This project received a rezoning
approval from P.U.D. - Planned Unit Development with a land use intensity of 4.0
to a P.U.D. - Planned Unit Development with a land use intensity of 5.0, This
project also received a land use amendment approval from Low Density
Residential to Medium Density Residential. Both of these ordinances were passed
on final reading by the City Commission on December 18, 1990.
As part of the rezoning and land use approval, the applicant entered into an
agreement with the Stonehaven Homeowner's Association which required the
applicant to commit to numerous conditions of approval including providing a
buffer wall on the project's north property line along with a twenty-five foot wide
landscape buffer and a 40' setback for all buildings from the north property line
of Tara Oaks P.U.D. (copy attached.) This agreement is still active and binding.
Since the approval of the project the applicant has done the following:
1. Pursuant to the approved master plan, the south portion of the property
was designated for utilization by a church. In fact, this property was sold
Ms. Tambri Heyden
November 23, 1994
Page 3
to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints on June 26, 1992 (see
attached warranty deed). Therefore, the Planned Unit Development now
has two separate owners, the applicant and the church.
2. In order to develop this first phase for the church parcel, the applicant
requested an approval for road improvements for the Tara Oaks P.U.D.
This request was made by Rick Rossi of Rossi & Malavasi Engineers, Inc.
to construct a portion of Knuth Road at the south end of the Tara Oaks
P.U.D. to accommodate the pending purchase of the church parcel.
Subsequently, on June 2, 1992 the City Commission granted approval of
the partial Knuth Road improvements required by the Tara Oaks P.U.D.
(see attached letter dated June 12, 1992 from Chris Cutro). Also attached
is a letter from the Boynton City Engineer dated June 19, 1992 indicating
what additional work was required to obtain a land development permit for
the road construction. The applicant expended over $4,000.00 in
conjunction with obtaining approval of these preliminary plans.
Additionally, the applicant has obtained the previous construction plans
from the previous owner which will be modified in order to obtain final
permits. (It should also be noted that over $100,000.00 has been set aside
in an escrow account to guarantee construction of this portion of Knuth
Road at such time as the church is ready to pull building permits for the
development of the site,)
3. The applicant has complied with the zoning condition of approval to
dedicate to the City of Boynton Beach twenty-five (25) feet for Knuth Road
pursuant to the attached right-of-way deed (ORB 7324, Pg. 1159, dated
June 26, 1992).
4. The applicant has expended over $28,000.00 for the construction of the
canal crossing at the intersection of Woolbright Road and Knuth Road.
Attached is correspondence concerning the canal crossing including:
a. A letter dated April 24, 1992 from the Department of Environmental
Resource Management indicating that no permit would be required
pursuant to the Palm Beach County Wetlands Protection Ordinance.
b. A letter from South Florida Water Management District granting a
permit exemption dated April 29, 1992. This letter indicates that the
South Florida Water Management District will not be analyzing the
surface water management system.
Ms. Tambri Heyden
November 23, 1994
Page 4
c. A letter dated May 8, 1992 issuing a permit for the culverting of
Knuth Road from the Florida Department of Environmental
Regulation.
d. A letter dated June 11, 1992 from the Lake Worth Drainage District
approving the permit for the Knuth Road/Woolbright Road
intersection and culvert at the L-26 canal.
e. A letter from the Lake Worth Drainage District dated April 14, 1993
indicating final acceptance and final inspection of the Knuth Road
culvert crossing.
1. A permit from the Palm Beach County Land Development Division
dated June 18, 1992 for Right-of-Way Construction indicating
approval to connect Knuth Road into the north right-of-way of
Woolbright Road.
g. Three (3) letters from the City consultant, Gee & Jenson, dated
January 18, 1993, April 9, 1993 and May 4, 1993. These letters
reference City Commission approval for the extension of Knuth Road
to the Tara Oaks church site and correspondence regarding
construction plans that were prepared and submitted by Rossi &
Malavasi to the City for approval.
5. Received approval for an excavation and fill permit by the City Commission
on April 8, 1993 for the construction of Knuth Road (see attached minutes).
6. Cleared Knuth Road right-of-way pursuant to a clearing and grubbing
permit for $6,000.00.
7. Requested a minor amendment to the master plan to amend a condition
of approval regarding construction of Knuth Road from the Stonehaven
P.U.D. on the north to Woolbright Road. This request was made on
June 15, 1992 and the petitioner paid a fee of $500.00 (see attached cash
receipt) .
II. Knuth Road P.C.D. This project received annexation, future land use amendment
approval, from County Commercial High to Local Retail, rezoning from County AR
- Agricultural Residential to City P.C.D. - Planned Commercial Development and
an approval for a text amendment to the City Land Use Element pertaining to
Ms. Tambri Heyden
November 23, 1994
Page 5
planning area 7, 7.J. As part of the rezoning and land use amendment approval,
this project was also the subject of an agreement with the Stonehaven P.U.D.
Homeowner's Association. This document is also attached for your reference.
Since the time extension granted by the City Commission on June 16, 1992, the
property owner has done the following:
1 . Received a master plan modification and site plan approval from the
Boynton Bea,::h City Commission on June 2, 1992. This modification was
to allow the replacement of a restaurant on a comer of this P.C.D. to allow
a convenience store with gasoline sales.
2. Obtained a minor amendment to the master plan to split the construction
costs of the extension of Knuth Road from the Stonehaven P.U.D. entry
south to Woolbright Road. The applicant paid $500.00 for the request of
this modification.
III. Boynton Beach Boulevard P.C.D. This project received annexation approval,
rezoning approval from County AR - Agricultural Residential to City P.C.D. -
Planned Commercial Development, a Comprehensive Land Use Plan amendment
from County Commercial High to City Commercial Local Retail, and a text
amendment to the City's Land Use Element deleting language indicating that this
property should be placed in a High Residential land use category. This project
also was the subject of an agreement with the residents of the Stonehaven P.U.D.
which abut the property to the west. Since the approval of the project, the
applicant has done the following:
1. As part of the original approval, the property owner agreed to comply with
a specific request from the Stonehaven P.U.D. Specifically, the removal of
several large Australian Pines along the portion of the property which the
neighbors considered to be a danger to adjacent property. Immediately
upon approval of this project, the property owner contracted with Arbor
Tree Services, Inc., who removed said trees.
2. This project also was the subject of a request for a minor master plan
modification in an effort to split the construction costs of the proposed
Knuth Road extension. As previously stated, the City Commission
approved a request for minor master plan modification for this project on
April 8, 1993 to allow all three (3) Planned Developments to split the Knuth
Road link construction costs.
Ms. Tambri Heyden
November 23, 1994
Page 6
3. Received approval for an excavation and fill permit from the City
Commission on November 16, 1993 (see attached letter dated November
23, 1993).
We have appreciated your working with us in the past. Recently, with the economy
improving, the applicant has received significant interest in the development of all three
parcels. We are, therefore, optimistic that with the proper extensions, we can move
ahead in their development. In that regard, I am forwarding to you under separate cover
a request to finalize the impact fee credit agreement for the construction of Knuth Road.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
cc: Bill Winchester
Michael Schroeder
AKJKljb/heyden.n16
'~~,r 'E .A; 3":'i ,:.: I: : L.In:,'; ,:' i-i'::~:::'CC_
-~;:::L :.,~C,(; ~.~c:rl'-~~~:::9--;?:..~9;:
~58? F.l31.
',.
... ~ L ;\. 1 (1 7 - 4 S:; .. '3 eH, .:4
r'~;:!.r' .2 S '1 0 : 1 9 ~ 0 . CO 3 P. 02
lune 1Stt 199.3
.,..~ Q! h".r~Kt<1
0, ....1... \V'b*-'
1(..~I\ OM
,.fOhn L 'ilfl1~tt.'~"'tf' ~1~'
rr.IVMlIlII\$'t.:
~ IMII,i,'l\ 11. ,W~'\M
((-~ AulilltJlll;I~i
~~' J!,~*, wr:~:;
"II';' Il tkl~..........
~,
~..
j !
~
"AKe W.;')f1TH O~A:IN^\f.a Dit$""AIO"
, _.,.J...,......I\......,'\.,....I\.~Pt_~."......,J/~ t...""..lt"'iY":/'"",._~/'<.u_..I,.",~1...........
,J:j4i ~;,;.I~'J',~i'nljAlk,
.)~t."A't b~II.r.;.r-l. r::V;;,Ii.IO.. .$;\.$&1
.",,,", ;!O...d~.. !:..'\~"i I;) r
p. ,'.. ,I...d~ hlUt~ '1a'W1~"l{ ~ of:f;~
koj;.l/.; .{I", Mi::1avni/ lnt.
$J.W VP!~.fjI'!i e,ivd'l ~:Jkt.: 4tJ
V\i \;;:!It, P.~lrn "~!ii,rj. fl ~ J'~f)9~ 1 ';HJ4
::)e<ca~ !~~/\r Rf;i$h
~h.tblet;;tl Fill:.! ,.l.r,("~lhrH:;'EJ LaH~r '(ll'!' nNDD Ptrm1t# 93..2C\30RlC.O'J. K.nuth
f>'r;f~.i:l C;,;"v~rt (,t~fl$!r-I~ oJ. l,.2'
U,~\t~ '{.,':'J(t,i; Ch"~~n:a~~ Dl$ukt bas (>~>mple.t~d iI fifi?t! ln~pe';.th:)J', c,' tllt) abo,;,'!! tH}!"i'ie:d
f:)~'o.l~:C ;1"tJ d{)€~ hv.!reby .~1:jpW\'e the. ir,;~ta; ~thjp Lake Ii\'( :'th Drainage D1sti'iCi also
':~e"tlfi~s H\:Jf thQ p>irm:{ ctit,~:rt;(IlH. h~",~ D~pn met COf;c~;mj"ig CiYlstructLonand rigllh.
1..$1.... JO,lll:"
"~(' \\ ...) .
.,.~;\~.V,/tllt.', C:rainas'~ :)l~trlcll1i 1"t:,( o1>n"!y;hgas"0 .::on~uu\.:1.IOl"'1 method:; Of iJ'Ihterl~;fl
'''';\l.!Sdi ,t,1i t"'.i!' "MtJOMrbidtji of ~["\g;r'lH::r l:1.tlJ devek)per,
Sll'!I;~i.1Yf
LAKl: W'ORTr-i D~AINACr DlSTt<lCT
P~WICk h. Martin, fI.E.
CH~tf\ei Erlg.ingei
" /.,I,A:r:
:(~t
Cl~'v ;;;1 "ol'M~m ~e~!..:;h r;n81M"r~..;~ :;*pA~i'I"!"~"Ii
~-\<'~" <~t~ fQ'i "fJlV"!r-!t~!t'i. Mifl~3f.H~ ~:~\;~rO~"
;: ;'1 ".. ,.,;'",' ) fl'__!-." ""'l"'f "",f.'R-,''''hr ,''''I')li
1""A."l:;'~..tj~ tVti.w!;,.,J1 ~..~~.Hi;, ',I.;)1Ptr\..l"""1 l\."'.rlifo"
~r-...
....0
(\v
;; L~
"f__.'
1~Hi::t~'t, ~.
J>;~'" 'M~~A1 C;;~~-'- r--_.22ZdL...
flt>st"i~.. I'M brs.nd ta:< '..mn~.mif!afi~)ar'lo. Th7', : *~t ;:l.GliI~ ~.' ;
l'M""~~'~-_.~--"---r;'-7"-' --
,'~;, .~. ." ,I'MI , .
: /"7.." '.. """;.r~ 0..'",. ,'-:""!".:.? /' /"~e '
1';':;'''.'-' .L.:.!.!...' ...~ ' .., ;'(';.~..:_~""~--..
l~'~" .pO'-? " , ("~, lilt" ~"t '. ,off ,
~"~~~~:~_'~~J.':f/J(:1... " p /fi'~~:..,____;
,r:;;~~. ......:;t/.." ,~1iO,~~~ t'j .~..~. - I
. r- .t2!J. v: . ,...1 " ..........!
11"'........... i('.~;:aJL..._--....-L....-... .~,~~~ ;
'.'. . ~>l: oil . ,.", 11=1l<" ,
: v"
.......~."____~"'...,,_g,,........-.-._........---..\-. ___.'_~"___. .___._.~,..--''''''R, ......-...1.
r .
! (
I. "
:,\
--
(',.\
()
.,...........
..-.,,"'-"'-'---~
\.~w... R f\~ ~-1--~ \~ F.~\\;
f"". \!; ,',~1,p,,,~~!,,,c,,-,"~.;,'..-r<-,,_:""'.~""-"'''''.,v<~-''''''''''~ ~ \ i, '~
11tl ~"-.,.....~,. \:':,.
, . .<. I
\~ p\'. \.I!\C)? 8 '
:',11 tf 1,\"'/'."" -.-
'l, I'
~t>
.'~~::! ~
J. ~'I ~ ~:. f L.f):'l\' ;~< t~~:)~=';~:(
TEL. t ..j(J: .:::.;,c-t~"_':~':,Ef'3'-'::~':~9~'1
,=t7}".:f? P02
1E~ N 2C7-49~-ge~4
I,~t~f' 2:3 --: 10 ~ 1'~ ~~o. CU~ ~. C!.
~~\'"" l(~! '{ l::'1 ~~ _ J:l ;~.~"ti Qr t ;;,,~!.j
SI'\,", 'j 1 ')tN/, F<J';J. :K!'!,YPha ,; & N';'.i:ill'\, ! n( .
~2J1 8s'~aj~~~ '~~G4d
W~~.: ~B1r B?~~~~ r~_ 3~t)~
~".~VIII
r"'::::-. c. ,...,,).., w..~..r
U,'\\ ~;; D1IlI
~ . \))rJM l. W!lI1Nl)rih ~il
~rfIi"'II\~~
t. ' ..'~~.'~' Wll\~lil!
~' "1Il11~"1I'
~~." ."'.. ..~. ll~.."
, . l' ,.' "'~ ..'" I /lM"""'i'
r\ 17.D'-'~~'
/1 ~r::~;;;' r 1)\,
r'l
j II r~ @~ n; r"l19>4~\i'J ~ Mil
I j'! l;;.:!",. li2I' 1/, U
.... .... l..:';J ...:;;l iJ I i......l
,<~\Id l,Jjr:'lfll'i')... ~:!~*,niAOHi' ~!~"r~!t~'r
.'!s.;;.;"'l, _iff' 'r.... .......~~....~;\. 'l=...~..'I....ir\_,,,....~...,...,',; """J,I'~_,,I'".__~-~ '-''Iow--''~ti.." -,,-<
,.Jo".tl 'l4lt,.i'(,dh'riO.,,.,!.
:[,.111;"( P~:!iAC", ~l..iJF;i!)A !l;;.ill>.i ';v(ii) ; j, 1 gg~
:)~" r ;"k t, J a:. i.. :'. ,. r' ;
'~'..lt "e~ t ,
~~DG ,;'e(i~'t #92-2C3DCj'R~Olf Kn~th Ro~d.!Woo~b~~~ght Rnad :nterse~tinn 8~d
C~l~~ 1, Cmr~l ~-261 SMA Jub #920~7
~~~. r:~'i_.;~ .t{~?"~~';i'E;i.: tne cn/f~~ ~1{.ti,;rl i)~sr~~ fer the tibOYt~; tatQ~"f',rIC~'-' pYI;),jett ltld dc
;F,~l t: l',e"'.!:.I,)' :!<;,';n)'.[~ ni' tni"'ti, of:J\" ~>JI'~it:.!.1C':'U' .:" OJ,' :li~....'dcj.' ~'tea ~'Je.j&ct t~ the
(:~low~nQ (o~a1l1o~!-
< / .'"
;~" tr'It' ~1iM "1' iq.;;""it'J1t.jo';{l1 ~ b""PGf'lrrl;t.~~ \,"~' ;-,e r~::j.ih~<lo~ on ~hl!1 top cf H.e
h: ..~'r: ',.~" ~ ;,,, ~ ~ 1"~;;'" 'J t.~;.. )' .d trf-~=t;;-'~;'~" ~ ~ ~.~" '- ,: 1 '";~ "'1 ~=>'F.I ,- ,(,';' ,
'''fJ-\,l,-, \..I"!of-,l-j'\'f 1'~1.....~l~'N_'.I')" ~" f C", '1..,1 ....' ~,,,.....~. ~;~_:", ~~..~::=-~
f!,tl ~,/~{I'I,..l t'l :" ~o. ~".j" ""~ ~lC'J<n .~ ;,,":.11i';~j ~.}. ,4ot" i....... -: "'f ',>:"~ t' ~. ~'r, .~ t," 110 n \'''~ r!'i 1 (~~ 1 ('\:,...
I ..". ~ j!.' ~.~ irt::...; (",'r t ~ ~),..;~ 1I '-iI' ~ 1ri ';; I "'j. '..... .,,},~... t~. ~ J t'v ! \, ~ ..; 't? ~,o, ..I :
j:;~;rl{i~1~~~~!'~ ~n',here dis'curlJtid ~.'i 1:"tJrH~tr!,.ict1Cq<~ act~~'J11.Y,
t)e t tn
hU'r:1Ht{;;' \1' " i ~er:;::rn~'lJct ;.;.\~ndl :~) to iwprOV.S\1 cftS'lg:; sect1cri o1cmg
r"\J:W;: t: ~ ,'[ mn;:' l~ n.,; 'lILH ng :~ 1 el.! 't i rg 5 nd ;)r:)i;iS v ~ ~ ~!p t 'ie 01' tM m~ 1 nter.an Cf~
:;I!I";'l~., .ht: [:hiffN:f\.1:arnl .~eri11S .:H\d S'r}~ S;:X~5 Srlf,.n be sta~iUted. TYPE:
I':'; ~':(<,i:,!' !n~1t}n 'f';!:::l}1 bE) "'r.,~,tOlM by i.~,~1C;. lr.ls e:enstr'\,u:tIcr'! g.han be
r:.~~;':~p 'h1~,,1 ,r; pr '( V" 'to <J r / 0~ n dl i".iJ de t 1'; " tl ') oj ldi" t t(l L WDO r 1I1r.ts. of
'I>~Y/ !J,!~~tH'i~Il'~f, v
i i.
;"C(!.1i.n,;:;.~ \-;n~ ()!'l'U:'\', al',{ .Hi:; an ~;H'(nH,(;. nl"".h'~;j b:'1 f:lERjt\n!'lj' eN'po;. ,,:f
~'I'~I'I'r.'it':L'" fC.':": 'i". ii~1"', r;'~;ljf'''. :"""':".' \i",'jf~(."'''y. 'l.'nJ"~CJ"'I.i-\f ti-,.t ""."
I,'" '~"".'''~ :'1 J., ~1I!'lf ~.""'...~. ...~ ,II" l..,:T'".-","--t' 'W"."....'I.....J ~.;~""., ,..J ~ft ,\.Ji 1""'.,-'9'1 '-.;- fIg. 13lrJ-.)"
f:..fi i11VC'~\ ,~*d p'''"~:;r~ 't~~ t'!!{;: c1j'~'mne~.c:ir\~i cr an)-- ";;o;~~t,J'.~,~j:tion:o
',~'i'rr,')t~~;,~ ',d; I t(tk,~ ~l'i fNSr.I:-,(j!tfl;:,j ':i,t,H~a:.,;t1];;:;'i$: l1li't&!:.H.t'y to pl"e\l~nt
"("'b".;".", F;~. "'..~t~\.(, lJi'p'("'':.'''~'l '''11' d.:,y,:I;<::..~-t1'l" Ciu"'n'i ~O"'r'I+~"'t'tfon
iO~' '; ~a. ".,' .t,' " ,.'" r '. 'f:;I r JJ'i I, 'lJl'......~. \-,. -P ''!: ...< , "t, .. \ '- ......,,1_1 ,\, ~1 \..-" .~..c.., .-l . ." ~
< :'\
;'jfH'7';'';,',~'.,:' 0" "~pn;;'~F,tHiv$j ,,1111 ~;(/'U;.Cl: t!1.Q U~C[ tn~p~r.::tHm Deplrt~i~l'It to
5:ke3J:e 1~irec:iGGa at lQlit t~ h~u~' i~ ~d~3"CI FBt1ure to do [0 may
'"'i:$i.\Jt ~;'\ ['rdw.:tlnr e'f -c!",,, ,!,!Qt".{ ",nt"1;ls'Jdi ifl'fr,Ht~Oft c:~n bel ~'ifld~ whfH'e
ti.:')::H,:;r,\;...., 'j:',C!I!,:,,:}rC1..i',d 1:*lstal1i.it'lc!:;, (I!:J~'t be> lJrco\lel'~d tor insr.ll!!r.t';on.
. ~1I~~_._._._,..-__._,_...<;~.t.,,,~,_,,,,,,,,,~,,,,,._-,,,,,,_,,,"'~4 ...vJ~""""'--._"""""'-~"'~'-
<~I
, !
y.'~iY..; ,q, ", >.;- I'.'; 1 'I, I' ."., ",',~" .' .....!. ..'. > {i". ..... t I::O'i ..
tit! .' .~i1!:. ,1.\.0. 3"r:rr. ~ T.a,..~.. Li ,.,; e,\'" H,g:., W l,r1 H' S. K~,Y .,Y , \ll!\)'ll
d ;"~tr.~ t'>: i ns f I n~ 1 :~ l~,pr;; if,~ I.
J,
Tr.s !,.'l~.j~ \{o':;.n tF~:i-,e:;i'S ~d~'.;rh;:t r{il1 ,';('it aec:ept. any 'f/~tf:r- f~~Clm dew;lttll"ll'l9
flHt':;~. C;,', .;;:; Gfrsit,:,},';t.n \<'\:l'"Ht~"l ,,,'~H'i{;Jt1orl ~'if app\"tJl./&": 'f-'t'Ofl; s.r.,W.M,l:>"
~~.,~~ LH:,~r, i~}~~r"'r t.'t~d t;~- 't~!'i ~~ ;:1ffftf,:,
'~
.'
(~!
(J
( 1 '
",
i)i~aw ~i.~~? f"l~~1 r~:..I-,.t'Ir. ;.~~~ ~~.l~~'" . ~1\tI!-'ie" ~~i! ~~~*, Fj_~Hr~ a.;l~:n 7:1i~;J.3~\~ f Uil;l. tJ':''') .flio-fiiJ1'J:.
'~~{',l_..;..:'....' ;..'/-'-1 .. t,... ~.i.i' _::7 .II,: '..l~,~:~::',.; :;.~; t:t;"_/:-L"_.
n:'.. I ".jC ~ ...,~C(;.'-\:-,el;!~~,;!::l'~~::
t:r.::icJ7 P(;3:~
TEL
t. ( 7'." !,;?, ~} " 96 9 4
~!~ 2P -; 10:19 No.aO! P.O'
~^I\.!.' ^,,'ll"";'" lI!'.iI ~i\':'\~ "!il:i'n;t,~'1
';~I'(,Hhe has Pfo\,~<1';:d ~ b~M
:12~~ of :he (~ost Of ~h~ ;lipa a
i'~A'~d unon 15S~.nce of fjns
~ V t-d'r'r~ ~; ~.~,~ ~ 0 f I:" ee C:q'.~) J~ r!. \'1 i r,:s S J!
n favvr Df LWCO in thB emou~t C!
d Hs instfll1HiDr;, BOI'lC ....nl I)~
~IH;;e:;t1(';.!'! by LWei) UC d8\1e:opc'r
t\) ;.. !~DD II
;: I
;"m'~t,g &g~'e1 t~a: !ion1f!c~n: CQ~str~ct1on Qust Start w~th!n
"t' ",,,..' (of 'I''''a .";"Yt.,.( -)""'.....,'''i ...:~j~"r'" "r' ~~l ~r'mi+ \'f"l~1 ~)'H'O':'
,\,. \1~Ci .'~ ~~......4- v-' l ~J.iJ ill ~,,~...,-,,""l'...Q... (,' ">01" to<' r'" J lla"
cid a~d ! ~I~ .,p!!c!t1)n ~uSt ts aD~1~ec r or to b~y
~1~~!tru~t10r ~:1.i\~tj or ~11'. .
::~ :;~"I\"Hl;:'~1 :US1~":'; ':j' ;;'\i(ccHQrs iF] tH:a ~\~\~ ':'lpei'a~,;
,; .'.~~. ''1'': ~ rta '; (. ~ ",e :1';' ~ n~~.;: 11; 5ten. .; r- ':;e>pc': (..1 i;,y, ~~.,
"\~
\. "
"
'~
" r.:c/..." ",.I.,. d-I,..,,., ..'f "1'..1 h, 'H"\{;.:;''''.~rl''''~ ,.,.f <''-''i, fl.f''''l'l''t. i....J...i ....,. tl.<,,,, ,'..)r\!'l
..., .....~. Y..~ ~,.. oil IY~ I,"" ,I -!o1;1n "'I ....',!\.o.J( '''t:"I...,,. ~, ..! '.. r'~' ~ t . f.....:Ji .!.J ".l"lt".;' Lon\J"" ~
\1,,:~: "i'\d!~r~ ';:'\11:.:' ;!!gre\:'~ t(; p;:!, ftH""" :::;e ,;,blJ\1f' H.t) T.,n.t.Mt !~"'UE. ~o "'bid
:: \',,~. .. ;,)~.'~ j ts ~ r:J' ," t} cl rj 1;\",10 11~ i ee!' \oj r~ t'l\'1't ~e S;I) f' I) nt da'I'6 9<1' W)"al'~ t i l) g 0\
!,.,: ('J ~.,-:O~ 1"~1"I~ ".r.'"., ti'\\~ (j~:",,1"'"~" !".,(....jCI """p;'.,,\)
..~ I,' .", g \l'I "I, j ':;j 1 \I;' I ..; I.. rr'" i -'.. ~.. ..~.. . ~,~. -' ...
, I; ,'" :..ir',.J'\"i,.f J-'C'.lI ! k t. ""t Ill, rJ f I~-r
'tt'~ ,".l r, ~ 1'\ ~ I ' f\)lf." 1~;Jt!.\..h_, <C' ". * r\ li. w- \'
~",. ,/
pT. ... y/ // ...~
,~~.,~ I ./'~~
'.: ." ,~~ "tJ~.-" ..1.... . ~-
. ,..........~~:=t;"'"-_.,~,.L~~~_.
!tt,/' ..~:t."r
f..' I ... .(". .r,~~~... I '
~\ I,~ ; ! , it ~ l~l ~? t; t e t S
,.r~;i!~'rr~-~"----~~~'-'--'~_.'-'-'
.~~di.-
A u.! ~
.. !'i(~1,- ~~. .~ ''.!:;/.fl_
'l'!dtfi')~ :; I. i l\liNt R i~M""f ,'. ~
~'1I.t. 1 '.Ai: 1..1 .lto:, tit ~, I'k',' 1 J ,-. ..... ' ~ . '". t..
(Please )~1nt or t)pe.rarnQ
!i1'c"g '~.:ith $1S!'\Huf'Gi
'~jJ ;.hP'i1;<t is. lHui':d 'r ,~"pH:,n~, r:f:a.~;: ;;'19'-' \:loth c;opHrs tinct retI.H"!
~o~h ~.~'ii CQ L~)D fsr !lg~5t~~~. '~e perm1! ~& v4'~d on'y ftfte. beti
~. ~t ~ :) \? ;:"1'11 tr ~ ~ ~ ~ r; ,;, ~l~; ~~1l11 t \ E r:. :f l ~ 'I (: s. i ~:i e 1 .
.'.1" .
.......' .
K.n S. Rcuijrs. ~.t.. Olr~ct~r
r I. t:. .
Pb~ LanG ~t\flnpment
~6 i'l~;(.it'HItC
,.,... .l~~!" ~
)1" i'\. ;
.,
~
;
r
~~'J
if.
/
i.j\
\~ (t. l
~;,L
n
GEE Be JENSON
Engineers-Architects-Planners. Inc.
One Harvard Circle
West Palm Beach. FL 33409
Telephone (407) 683-3301
Fax (407) 686-7446
May 4, 1993
Erico Rossi, PE
Rossi & Malavasi Engineers
580 Village Boulevard
Suite 140
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
Re: Knuth Road
Tara Oaks P.U.D.
Church Access Portion
Dear Ric:
Of the three (3) sects of Construction Plans you recently sent to my office, two (2) were
of the previous layout with the retention pond still located in the Knuth Road right-of-way.
I I have r~turned both sets to you with this letter. Please forward two (2) up-to-date,
signed and sealed sets of the Construction Plans to my attention, along with a copy of
the executed Water Management Tract documents for this project. All of the other
comments from my April 9th letter have been satisfied.
,
IC;~~~
W. Rich rd Staudinger, P.E.
City Engineer
-.'~
RECElVED~
..
WRSfJer
cc:
Vincent Finizio
Chris Cutro
Mike Sewell
J. Scott Miller
MAY 5
PLANNING DEPT.
...
92025/207
11111
Mf"'~M
0, hI\Ie, W.~
K.rlWl 0.11
Jvhf'l l.~ In
....""""......
WIIIn ca. WImM 0&
-~..
AilIfWt L ~
AItttNf
p.", I tchoM. , A.
iAKI WOATH ORAINAOI D,.'tFUCT
Uo.i MI&.ITAftY "~^'l.
OILMV .'''OM, n.OPlIDA IO~M
April 14, 1993
Mr, Enrt<::o ROlli, P. E.
Ro"i Be Matavasl, lnc.
580 VlUlge Blvd., SuIte 140
West Palm BtlCh, FL 33409.'904
Oear ;Mr. ROllI:
SubJeth ~ eeeptance Letter for L W~rmlt N93'2030IllC.01. Knuth
f1t;:d.2...lvert Cl'~ning of l-26
LaKe Worth Orainage District has completed a final inspection of the above named
facility and does hereby approve the installation, Lake Wortn Drainage DIstrict also
certlnes that th~ permit conditions have been met concerning construction and rlghts-
of-way.
lake Worth Drainage DIstrict Is not certifying as to cOI"1$tructlo1"l metnod, or mat.r1AI~
used, thl5 is the reSpOn&ibillty of engineer and permi\t....
Sincerely,
LAKE WORTH DRA'NAGE DISTRICT'
Patrick A. M.rtln, P.E.
DIstrict Engin.~r
PAM:mm
t~: City of Boynton Seaeh Engln.c'/dt~g Department
William a. Winters, Manlier, LWDD
Shaughn J. Webb, Chl,f Inspector, l woo
~p.I"
"
Oc-~.Y D.~ . eoo. ~oton .OH~ · Stl)'l'ItOn fMctlt WOtl ,.I./m B..~1l 7~,.)t!G . ,^X ("01> .".'11'4
\:
J
",' .
L ,...,L\...
~~
i-
C"'" ,i
t~,-. ',.
n
GEE & JENSON
Engineers.ArcI11Iecls.Planners. Inc
.
April 9, 1993
One Harvard Circle
West Palrn Beach, FL 33409
Telephone (407) 683.3301
Fax (407)686.7446
Mr Enrico Rossi
Rossi & Malavasi Engineers
580 Village Boulevard
Suite 140
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
Re: Knuth Road - Tara Oaks P.U.D.
Construction Plans
Dear Mr. Rossi:
Gee & Jenson has reviewed the revised construction plans submitted by Rossi &
Malavasi for the extension of Knuth Road adjacent to the Tara Oaks P.U.D. This portion
of the roadway construction is covered by a prior-to-platting agreement with the City. Our
comments are noted below:
1. The plans call for FOOT Index 232 Type C & E inlets
without sumps. The inlet detail on the plan must
include sumps.
2. Add a weep hole to the proposed sump in the control
structure (S-3).
3. Eight foot bike path is approved on one side of the
road to match existing alignment north of Tara Oaks
(Stone Haven).
4. Driveway concrete must be 6- thick with 10 gauge 6-
x 6- wire mesh. Add to detail.
5. Transition curb & gutter to 0- high curb so as to
prevent traffic hazard.
6.
Water management tract must be dedicated by
separate instrument or platted to provide legal access
from the roadway for maintenance.
RO" "t'" ...."
, .oCt.., Fr::,. ,',
----.." r' n_:'.
AFR
1.1
PU.NNli~G C<:.~ 1-,
-
----
.
fI
n
Rossi & Malavasi
Attn: Mr. Enrico Rossi
April 9, 1993 - Page 2
7. Drainage calculations were not submitted with these
plans. We have assumed that nothing associated with
the drainage system was modified by the revisions to
these plans.
The excavation & fill permit for this construction was approved by the City Commission
on 4/8/93. Please coordinate a preconstruction meeting with the Engineering Department
prior to initiating any construction beyond the clearing presently underway north of the
canal.
Very truly yours,
WRS/lg
92025/207
cc: Mike Sewell
Vince Finizio
J. Scott Miller
Chris Cutro
/
GEE & JENSON
Ei,lgineers- Archilects-
PlannerS. Inc
January 18, 1993
Mr. Ric Rossi
Rossi & Malavasi Engineers
580 Village Boulevard
Suite 140
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
Re: Knuth Road to Tara Oaks Church
Dear Ric:
Enclosed please find one executed original each, of the Prior to Platting contracts for the
extension of Knuth Road to the Tara Oaks Church site. As noted in the cover letter, the
City Commission approved these contracts by Resolutions #R93-04 and R93-05 at the
January 5, 1993 Commission meeting.
In accordance with Appendix C of the Code of Ordinances, you are to report in writing
monthly on the status of these projects. All construction is to meet City requirements,
including completion and certification of construction.
Please call if you have any questions on this matter.
Ve.ry truly Yours,
Gee & Jenson
Engineers-Arc' ts-Planners, Inc.
. i ar tfu~A
City Engineer
......
. ~
WRS/bf ..-
EncL
92-025/207
cc: Vince Finizio w / encL
J. Scott Miller
Chris Cutro
Don Jaeger
James Cherof
n -or r-':: :~~ ~ -~ \
l'-..J: '.,-,,~.:__.. t .......-
JM{ i 9
FL\NNH'iG. :-:-:::.
----- ..,
One Harvard Circle. West Palm Beach, Florida 33409-1923.407/683-3301 . FAX 407/686-7446
%e City of
r.Boynton r.Beacli
/~ /201. .PCi
..J
Pfa.nning &' Zening 'Department
100 'E. '.Boynton 'Beadi 'Boulevard
P.O. '.Bo{.31O
'Boynton 'BelU.h, 'Jforida 33425.0310
(407) 738.7490, :T.'<<: (407) 738.7459
June 29, 1992
Mr. Kieran J. Kilday
Kilday & Associates
1551 Forum Place, Bldg. 100A
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Dear Kieran:
This is to inform you that on June 16, 1992 the City
Commission approved your request to extend expiration dates of
the Knuth Road PCD, Boynton Beach PCD and Tara Oaks PUD for one
year.
This means that the plats for these developments must be
approved by June 17, 1993. If you are in need of further
extensions, your request should be addressed to this office no
later than May 17, 1993.
I hope this letter is of some help to you. If you should
have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to
call me.
Yours truly,
~~
Christopher Cutro
Planning & Zoning Director
CC/jm
5Imerica's qateway to tfie qulfstream
-
-t .rzTU City of
.
r.Boynton 13eac/i
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Becu/i 'Bou1e.vara
P.O. 'Bo;(310
'Boynton 'Beadi, '.fforitia 33435-0310
City:Jfo.{[: (407) 734-8111
'.f5tX: (407) 738-7459
THE CITY ENGINEER
June 19, 1992
Rossi & Malavasi Engineers, Inc.
580 Village Boulevard, Suite 140
West Palm Beach, Fl 33425
Attention: Enrico Rossi, P.E.
Re: Knuth Road Improvement
Tara Oaks, P.U.O.
Land Development Permit Application
RECEIVED
JUN 1 9 1992
Dear Mrl' Rossi:
Approval of the partial Knuth Road improvements, required by the
Tara Oaks P.U.D., was given by City Commission at their June 2, 1992
City Commission meeting. Prior to beginning work, a land development
permit must be issued by this department. To this effect, please
submit the following information.
1) Six sets of construction plans, rectified according to staff
comments and signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record.
2) All permits, including but not limited to: SFWMD, LWDD and
Palm Beach County Roadway.
3) Non-refundable administrative fee in the amount of $2,219.24
(.02 x $110,962).
4) Florida Power & Light cost estimate for the installation of
street lighting, along with a non-refundable street lighting
fee in the amount of 125% of the street lighting cost.
5) Performance Bond in the amount of $122,058.20 (1.1 x $110,962) .
6) If the present applicant plans to sell the property or assign
the rights of this approval in any way, the City will need a
letter of assignment transferring all rights and accepting all
conditions of the original approval.
.
7) A statement from the owner agreeing to the dedication of the
right-of-way, including time and method of such dedication.
Jlmenca's gateway to tfie (ju[fttream
..
~.
Rossi & Ma1avasi Engineers, Inc.
June 19, 1992
Page #2
If we can be of any further assistance please contact this office
at 738-7487.
Very truly yours,
CITY. OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
/'~)?- "
Michae1~azunas, P.E.
City Engineer
MEK/ck
cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
Chris Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
I,IIIMJ.II
'--
JCM I. WtlI!WOrfl In
.....,."..,..
W1111n ca. WIn""
........ ...,...,
AIftrG .. ~IWI
M1mIY
Ptfft & 1ef'tCnt. P)I,
LAKE WORTH CAAINAClE DISTRICT
1301' MILITAAY rAAlL
l)1~AV llACH, ~I.ORlgA >>4104 June 11 t 1992
Mr. Keith B. Jackson, P.E.
Sha11oway, Fay, Rayman & Newel', Inc.
1201 Belvedere Road
W8S~ Palm Beach, F~ 3~405
. Dear Mr. Jackson:
LWDD Permit #92-2030C/R.Ol, Knuth Road/Woo1br1ght Road Intersection and
Culvert, Canal L-26, SHA Job *92037
We have reviewed the construction plans for the above referenced proj!ct and do
and do Mereby approve of them for construction in our service area subject to the
following conditions:
( X) At the time of insta'1at1on a benchmark will be required on the top of the
water control structure(s) with tn. elevation clearly daf1ned.
Subject:
( X )
( X )
( X )
( X )
( X )
x
x )
Permittee wi" restore r1ght-of.way to its original or better
condition where disturbed by construction activity.
Permittee will reconstruct canal(s) to approveddes1gn section along
projects 'i~its, including clearing and proper Sloping of the maintenance
berms. The cle~red canal berms and side slopes shall be stabilized. Type
of stabilization shall be approved by LWDD. This construct1on shall be
completed prior to any bu1ld1ng activity adjacent to ~WDO rights of
way/easements.
Perm,ttee will obtain any and a" permits required by OER/Army Corps of
Eng1neers, S.F.W.M.D.. Palm Beach County and/or any municipality that may
be involved prior to the ~nmmenc1ng of any construction.
Permittee will take al' reasonable precautions necessary to prevent
turbidity or si1tfng upstream and downstream during construction.
Permittee or representative wil' contact the lWDO Insp~ct1on Department to
Schedu1e inspections at least 48 nours in advance. Failure to do so may
result in rejection of the work until visual inspection can be mads where
applicabla, Underground installations must be uncovered for insgection.
Permittee must subm1t "record drawings" witMn sixty (50") days
of receiving final approval.
The Lake Worth Drainage District w1il not acc!pt any water from dewatering
either on or offs1te unti1 written notification of approval from S.F.W.M.D.
has been submitted to this office.
(1)
O~rIY aM'" . Doc. Fu.1Ot'l 'IM-S3a . eoyn~n fJtlct11 Will PJ/m It. TU.NU · flAK {~1l "'K-fH.4
gOd:. 0 N JI Z. y ^ Y "1 V H "Y :z S 1!I 0 H >I< MV L. E:: : l. 0 ~ e . Ii: e . 9 0
-- ,._---_.._----_._-~--._._,._-...- ----..--------------...---.---
.~
..
(
)
Perm~ae hu-'ovidod a bond in favOF of LWOO in tha amount.
110% . the co"" of the pip, and its 'sta"~~')n. Bond wi1i '.';
re1eosed upon ;S1uance of fino' inspection by ~wDO and davelop~r
submittal of IIrtCord draw1ngsll to loWDD.
P8rmittee ogrees that si~n1ficant construction must start withir
onl year of the. date of permit 1uu~nc! or tnis pllrmit w11' b"ccl/
void and I new application must be applied for prior to any
construction activity on lite.
The Permittee, assigns. ~r 5~cceS50rs in title agree to opar8t~
and maintain the arainage system in perpetuity.
( X )
x
( )
In r.ons1dp.r~t1on of an~ hj ar.c~ptante or thp permit i~~u~d by the LWDC.
thl! undersigned agree5 to f'!p.r'Orll\ the iibOVl! (.r,d further agrees to hoh
tl1e ~WOD, its sgen ts ~nd ~mp 1 oyee! ha rm1 e!S ;0.,. any damage emana t 1 n~ '; t
of. ~r resulting from th~ perm1~ her~,n 9ran~td.
LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT
William Go Winters
'PERMITtER
v W R
(Please print or type name
.along with signature)
By:
, .
ThiS permit is 1ssued in dllplicate, Please sign both cop1es 4nd l'etli,':
both Gopies to LWDO for signature. ihe permit 1$ vAlid on'} ~fter ~O.:
the permitt,r and p~rm1ttee hove signed,
cc: Ken S. Rogers. P.E.. Director
PBe Lan~ Oevtlopment
Ed Mac.:1ejko
~FWMD,
( 2)
"
Sad
ON. :t1!ll'Y^V'"1VW .., z..OY*, ~v"-c I,LO ze 'I!::Z '90
iJJie City oj'.
r.Boynton r.Beacli
'l!ftuming c!J' Zonine q;tp~nt
100 ~ t.Boynton t.Btadt tJ30uUvarrf
P.O. tJ3~31O
t.Boynttm t.Bta&, '}1orilfa 33425.0310
(407) 7.38-7490, 7JU; (407) 738.7459
June 12, 1992
Mr. Rick Rossi
Rossi & Malvasi
1675 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
Suite 408
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Re: Tara Oaks Infrastructure Improvements
Dear Mr. Rossi:
Please be advised that at the June 2, 1992, meeting of the City
Commission your request to construct a portion of Knuth Road at
the south end of the Tara Oaks P.U.D. was approved.
A land development permit is required prior to commencement of
construction. Contact the City Engineer at (407) 738-7487 for
detalls related to this permit.
We hope that this letter is of some help to you. If you should
have any questions regardlng this request, please feel free to
call me.
Yours truly,
~~
Chrlstopher Cutro
Plannlng and Zoning Director
CC:ald
xc: ,Michael Schroeder
C:TARAOAK.ALD
_~__"__.."____..__~"____~tJ_~.c,...Cl....~_..__-,-~~ .J .=......1.,"-.... ~.._ '" ..~.. ....L~.._,._~._ ,',"
titu City of -
$oynton $eatfi
u - 33$.4
100 'E. 'Boynton '&tuft. 'Boufevara
P. O. 'lJo{.31O
'Boynton 'Beadt., '7forida 33425-0310
{407} 738.7490
, :FJtX: (407) 738.7459
Pf.anning'Department, City:Jfa[[ CompU{. 'West 'J1/ing
June 5, 1991
Mr. Chuck Yannette
Kilday & Associates
1551 Forum Place, Suite lOOA
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
RE: Capitol Professional Center PCD
Dear Mr. Yannette:
Please be advised that on Tuesday, June 4, 1991, the City
Commission extended the PCD zoning and master plan approval of
the Capitol professional Center peD indefinitely. The Capitol
Professional Center peD is located at the southeast corner of Old
Boynton Road and Knuth Road and consists of two 33,000 square
foot general office buildings for a total of 66,000 square feet.
It should be noted that pursuant to the City's Concurrency
Management Ordinance (Ord. No. 90-18), the Capitol Professional
Center PCD is not exempt from the concurrency requirements.
Thus, the project will be reviewed for compliance with the
drainage and traffic level of service standards when a site plan
and/or plat approval is applied for.
You-are being notified because Kilday & Associates is the last
agent of record for the abbve-mentioned project.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact our
office at 738-7490.
Very Truly Yours,
,.)u--~. ('
\. f, /-....-,
,-- ..."'~ ----- ......... ""~
CHRISTOPHER CUTRO, AICP
Planning Director
Attachment
cc: subject file
chron. file
central file
a: capitol.3jcurrent
5hnema's gateway tc
~8R.,IJ
W~J
1iI~ 4trAC{/#> r. ~Ll>i'Y
j,Vrm 11.
<. J!3 fY'I j ,"(!:u f) t:t?t/~s.
.-X/ S 10.,.) ,.. ..LA '("
bi- reAl p~--;c.r' rrtA..
-f;1rl. ' (l..(1lf .J1~ l~ r.
, t. All'-':.,h. ,.),' /" JPV'
I d7/" - v t,,,sft.l('ltD I. ~
W,< 1"'- ./ fL:. Jl ~
/j Y \JJV~tiJJ-r1lV
,
I
..
'-'"
KNUTH ROAD
.
.
'\
-
i
;a
S
..
'00
I U
I 10
I =1 .b :z:
~,.
3:' fa
I~ .. III.
.. !O I
:s i ,.'"
g-4
r: zi
-. ' g-C
i
t
I
:
.
i
..
"
:
~ C/)
i 0
, >
. I""
I m
-
.. I .
i Co>
~
~9.
:D .
~ .
!~i!!
;~ J ~
.. :-:. i
.J~I
'.1~
J-i
I:~
-.
mm
i:,- !fi
.' -z
J ~~ .
, 11
i (t
f
r:..J;
~~.~
~~B
t.' w
m
~H
I-
. ,
!
,
f
o if fH 'l =l
H hi l! !!
~. &:1 r: r_
~I fil; i! H
, p. h ti
.. 1 -;: j'r 'r1 ,
o . -.- 1 .
l ill; I. l!
'''It;l''
! ~i Ei it 5
J ; i i ~ .1 I
J Et f i i; !
~ : I' i ~; l; I
r ! ~r ;
t t. f
r ~f i I
f :j ~
~ i~ j I
i
I
..,...,ou..
".,..1,'
"~.u'
.t Jr'I'..
II
~"
!I
If
:s
... i - 1:1 N 1:1 1:1 '7101
=.. ;c m 0 > > I""C
:l.!:. 1:1 :D Z ::D I: C) ::DO-
q~ g] < ;:0; ~ ;:0;01""
Z 0 III III -::DO
;; Ii < <5 Z g z Z Z
c:> ~ n ..
i; t - <5 C c:> > :II c:>>c:>
C/) ~ ~
~: Ii 5i 1:1 I"" ,. ,. ::D ::D '"
>. ::D I m m I""
-. II - 0
~i 5 i > ::D 0 .. ... 0>8
m < 0 ... CI""
..;' n ::u > 6 0 n j;O::D
!i I ~ 0 ..
m ... I a~>
0 '"
u ;.. . > ::D
:' 0 ::Dm
0 ':!>
i 0
i .. ::D
;.. >
j :f
'0 CD
CD
I\J ~ b
~ ~ - 0
0 0 .. . -0
CD Co> 1:1 0 0 PC/)
co- O (I) (I) In ... ..
~~ 0 :v :v ;W ;W ~="
".
I
. .
".
.
.
ii
. .
_w
':;
'0
I""
o
01
o
-<
z
~
o
Z
::D
o
>
o
-f
o
-f
>
I""
,...
o
-f
>
::D
m
>
1I~!! I
,:'l~ i
jHh'
iim'
.;5 -
. ~ii~
1~!5
,.111
i;~l
_:i~
"1'1
. . -
I
"-
II
!
,
.
~
1:-
~c
~~
.
II
>>
t'
1I
w
Q
.
>
o
. .
CJ)
=i
m
c
>
-4
>
:;:
j;
.,
s.c.... ,." ~n'
0.... b 1" ""~
c..- a,._ --.OA"'"
'-1liiie, ",....
0.--..... A.I.-.t...
it~:.:>~
CAPITOL PROFESSIONAL CENTER
BOYNTON BEACH, ROAlD"
MASTER PLAN
KllNy . Auoc",,,
lAnd6C"" AtcMKtS I ~
'""~""-c:e
..... :I0OI
_,_ -. _ J3401
13061 .. un
PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO.~ 91-094
FROM:
J. Scott Miller, city Manager
J~a.2k-,.~ dt.~4
Christoj;fhe"'fGCuti-'o, Planning If'il:'ector
TO:
DATE:
May 22, 1991
RE:
Status of 'capitol Professional Center PCD - City
Commission Recommendation
.
.
Pursuant to section 9.C.13 of Appendix A-Zoning, the City
Commission shall review any rezoning approval to a planned zoning
district (PUD, PID, PCD) that has expired and take action in
accordance with paragraphs a. of b. below:
"a. The city commission may extend the zoning of
the property for a period of one (1) year or
more, or may extend the zoning of the property
indefinitely. If development of the property'
in manner specified above does not occur by
the end of said time extension, the city
commission may grant additional time extensions
or may take action in accordance with paragraph
b. below:
b. The city commission may instruct the city
manager to file an application to a more
restrictive zoning district and/or future land
use category. The zoning of the property shall
be considered to be extended until final adoption
of the more restrictive zoning district and/or
future land use map use category. 11
The Capitol Professional Center (a.k.a. Knuth Road Associates)
Planned Commercial Development (PCD), located at the southwest
intersection of Old Boynton Road and Knuth Road originally
received a rezoning/master plan approval on September 3, 1986,
which subsequently expired on March 3, 1988 (eighteen months).
The project received a one-year retroactive time extension from
the City Commission on August 16, 1988, which subsequently
expired on August 16, 1989. The project consists of two '33,000
square feet office buildings for a total of 66,000 square feet.
Pursuant to Section 9.C.13 of Appendix A-Zoning, the Planning
Department requests that the Capitol Professional Center PCD be
placed on the June 4th, City Commission ag~nda for a .
recommendation on the status of the approval. If the approval is
r.ot retroactively extended, the City Commission may wish to
instruct staff to file a rezoning and/or land use amendment
application to a more restrictive zoning category. If the
approval is retroactively extended, the City Commission should
specify whether the approval is extended indefinitely or for a
set period of time.
It should be noted that pursuant to the City's Concurrency
Eanagement Ordinance (Ord. 90-18), the project is not exempt from
the concurrency requirements, regardless of the status of the
rezoning/master plan approval. Thus, the project will be
reviewed for compliance with the traffic and drainage level of
service requirements when a site plan and/or plat approval is
applied for.
Since the City'S future land use map shows an office commercial
land use category for the subject parcel of land, it is
recommended that the current rezoning/master plan approval for
an office complex remain valid for an indefinite period of time.
As previously stated, the impacts generated by the project will
be assessed at the site plan and/or platting stage,
If you have any questions please contact our office.
Ene.
cc: subject file
chron. file
a:capitol.docjcurrent
(--
(/
"-'!
~
Soul.n Florida Water Mdnagt.d\ent District
...
MllI (JUII CI\l11 AOl\d . P.O. 3l>:\ l!4Ml . Wlttt {'l"lm UVi1c:n, PL. ,"',HfS..t08O · Wl7l n!f'.~f'K) · FL W" T! I ~~.~3i.tt
CON 24-05
,.;i"
..~ ~
,ft." ~....-
\" ,
~,
~.:: ....l
'; ~
-('
FINAL APPROVED
APR 2 9 1992
Rt8ulat1on Oepartment
App1ieat1on No. 820417-4
Apr11 29, ~;92
WPS
.
Boynton Stach City Engineer
P.O. Box 310
Boynton B.a~h, FL 33435
Dear S1ra:
Subjtct:
~ 50.02876-5
~111am Winchest.r
Project: Knuth Read/Woolbright Road Intersection
Location: Palm B.ach County, S30/T45S/R43E
A r.~uost for Permit Exemption pursuant to Rul. 40E-4.053, Flor1da
Aam1n1.trat1vt Code (F.A.C.) his been ree.~v.d for tht Ibova rtferenced
project. The owner has eert1fied that .1' the conditions for the Ixemption
have bien or wil' be met upon construction: conseQuently thl Oistr1ct wi" not
b! analyzing th. surface water m.nlg.mtnt system. It is th.r.for~ nlcessary
that you consider th~s in your rtv1tw of the project.
.' .Sincerlly,
~~~~.
Kenneth S. Todd, Jr., P.E.
$uperv1.ing Prof...1ona'
Surface Wattr Management Division
KST/ld
c: OER
W1111am Winch..ter
Sha'loway, Foy, Rayman' Newt1', Inc.
.,,,,,.'11111/ ''''10,",.
'I.... .\'111,"":" IIMJrl1',11I \\1.11111 .1.IIIWc II "".,11 I "fri..lIt1II'rd.,". 1....lh 'i "",,'h,II' , \\',...., 1'.111" 1\,',1111 rrtl"fI'" ,'".,., f".'\'UII\..lllf\'/""f
,1...",..,.1\, ',.'tf;;!'" \1...1,,, o\N'.''''~'*''''''X'.''YH''''~''''''% tal$6~"* . XVL,'S : L tl :c. 6 '8 Z 'S 0
- - _u .. ... _.. _.. ." _.. _...
KatL!H '1'. MHCUIl. ChJlr- Y
<':llrulc: Phllllplil, Vl\:c U .f
Calrnl ..\. It(,h~rl"
(..'61wl J. t:lll\qlll~t
;"I~r\' J\k( 'Ml\'
"~'II' rUllh,'l' .
.\\.1I1d,' I'llrd I.\'~'
" tOo'.l' ,-/.."11 V ''''Q.
COLln'l Adm'n'larl
-. ,
r ,
119~
April .24, 1992
Robert Wolsmall
D..,artm,nt oC
Enylronmental Rd5~
Man.Bement
Lak, Vorth Dr.in~;. Distriet
c/o Mt. Keith Jlck.on
Sh.llo~.y, roy, R.yman and Ne~ell, Inc.
l~Ol aelv'dtr. Road
WeMt Palm B..ch, rL 33405
Dear Mr. Jackson:
SUBJECT: EXEMPTION fOR ~AKi WORtH DRAINAGE DISTRICT; nr-218.92
This is cu aCKllowlld;t r.ceipt ot yo~r application to culvert approximately
96 lint~l f'tt of the ~ak, Worth Draiu.ge Di$tridt L-2' oln.l for the ero..ing
of Knuth R.oad.
At tlli~ ti~G, hO permit i. required pursuant to tho Palm Beach County Wetlands
Prct.ctiou Ordinance, Sttctioll 11.01 (u). This d..terlllinatiol\ is basl!d solely upon
tht infurrult1~n on thl .ncl~~~d faur (4) sh~et~ provid.~ to thij Department by the
applicallt and l'llay not bt valid in Lh. event of subsequent rule ahln;e.. Our
exemption does not relieve you ot the need to obtain any other lO~ll, .tlte or
federal ptrmit. which may be rtquir.d.
Ba; lIu!vi..,d that turbidity .creens (or CoIther.-m..n. of--t-urbidity control) muatbe
utiliud .. neca.llry during construction such that turbidity ltlyels ill the
projElct art I. do nClt Etxc.:..cl 29 N.'l'.U.'1 ~bov~ natural background., AlIo, b.
advised that any alteration of ~angrov.., or dredging or filling attivit1e. not
covered by thig latter may require a p.rmit.
It you have any question., pl..at eantaet Ms. Denise Cromp It (401) 355-4011.
Sincerely,
~~~. (lA~_ .
Barbara Con~Yt s.nio~n~nt.l Analy.t
Coa.tal a04 Wetland.. Divi.ion
BC:I>EC:fb
Inclolur..
:> "1; III.II(et.! vII It!L')'\'~1I ""p.'
gOd
1111 ~t)UTH DIXIli IIWr'l SUITl! HtI
"'EST rALM m~ACII, fLl)ItU).~ 1 H~'S
(407) }~~.40J I
SVNCOM In.~l1' I
· - - 0.... "" TAT.... J .... : J... 0 e e 'e:: e 'e c
ONa % . V^':l''''1VN "I' ... - - - ..... ~ ~