The URL can be used to link to this page

REVIEW COMMENTS {J (.- l. --- (91L 2. :riA- DfI-r-.J JlMP c;'S';' all SITE PLAN REVIEW REVIEWERS CHECKLIST FOLLOWING 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS Obtain 2nd review plans - P&Z "Control Plan" Obtain 1st review comments (check for the submittal of required appeals and/or variances) 3. Obtain amended plans checklist ~___.. i. amended application ---U:~----- ii. color elevation drawings ---Y~___ iii. color samples y(;..S ~t.) 1J I ~___ 4 . y6s 5. ut!L 6. Y'~ 7 . N/~~ 8 . ... 9>'>.:. 11)""i(1fl t7~ YP -TV- . '1e:.~ _ 10. ye 5 11 . .------ _Yt~ 12. iv. overlay of site plan or landscape plan v. photographs Public notice Land development sign(s) Prepare 2nd review comments Prepare staff report Check for Palm Beach County's response regarding traffic Prepare locator map with overlay-. M:t:~ I /~,/ft Prepare I where applicable, reduced copy of site plan/landscape plan with overlay Ensure nine (9) sets of plans are available for P&D meeting Prepare cover letter to the applicant regarding board and Ci t"l" Commission meeting dates and Building Department checklist -k{~ ; n f6.A-A t~L- !Jv./5P ~. Kilday & Aaoclataa Landscape Architectsl Planners 1551 Forum Place Suite 100A West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (407) 689-5522 · Fax: (407) 689-2592 MEMORANDUM Date: February 13, 1996 From: Marcie Tinsley To: Ms. Tambri Heyden, Director Planning & Zoning Department, City of Boynton Beach Subject: Tara Oaks Planning and Development Comments/Staff Report Our File No.: 738.2B The majority of the P&D Staff Report Comments dated January 12, 1996 are acceptable, however, the Petitioner requests the following comments be modified as follows: J.d ENGINEERING DIVISION tIJ~ ~ Comment No. 21: ./6 ..J Pulte Homes will construct the roads in two lifts, however, Pulte Homes has not been obligated to do anything at the dead end of Southwest Congress Boulevard as it is off- site. Mike Haag has suggested in his recommendation no. 55 that the City process an Abandonment Application to abandon Southwest Congress Boulevard west of Tara Lakes Drive West. As you know, the Homeowners Association of Lakes of Tara has an expressed interest in section of road for other purposes. We would recommend that Mr. Haag's suggestions be pursued by the City with comments from Lakes of Tara. PLANNING AND ZONING Comment No. 28: Pulte Homes will use the alternative rear building elevation shown on the architectural plans which depicts more detailing on the second floor in the areas of concern. Pulte Homes finds that the alternate elevation addresses Staff's concerns. Due to the berming and landscaping, the first floor will not be visible from the adjacent perimeters. RECOMMENDATIONS: Comment No. 54: The trash collection area detail as shown on the Final Site Development Plan does not allow the gate to open towards the vehicle use area. We have met with Bob Eichorst of the Public Works Department and he has approved our trash collection areas, design, and locations. Mr. Eichorst never stated that there were not enough collection points, and his memo does not address that concern. However, Mike Haag would like us to Ms. Tambri Heyden February 13, 1996 Page 2 redesign the trash collection area to add a sidewalk leading to the side of the trash collection area and move the gate to the side that has the sidewalk. Pulte Homes will agree to redesign the collection areas to satisfy both the Public Works Department and the Planning & Zoning Department. If you have any questions, or need any additional information, don't hesitate to contact me. MWT/kfj/dkerry. mem 7.D.l NEW SITE PLAN TARA OAKS PUD I PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-066 SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION February 7, 1996 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Project Name: Tara Oaks Applicant: pulte Home Corporation Agen t : Kieran J. Kilday, Kilday and Associates, Inc. Location: East side of Knuth Road approximately 570 feet north of Woolbright Road File No.: NWSP 95-011 Land Use Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential DU/acre (MeDR) maximum 9 . 68 Zoning Designation: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Type of Use: Townhouses Number of Units: 192 Site Area: 630,311.65 square feet (14.470 acres) Building Area: 206,038.8 square feet Surrounding land uses and Zoning District: (see Exhibit "A" - location map) North LWDD L-25 Canal and farther north is Stonehaven PUD South Undeveloped land part of the subject PUD East Stonehaven PUD and a developed, R-3 zoned, apartment complex West Knuth Road extended and farther west is developed residential property located in Palm Beach County Existing Site Characteristics: Vacant property which includes vegetation that will be preserved relocated throughout the site. native and or Proposed Development: (see Exhibit "B" - proposed site plan) The development will include 22 residential buildings that house 192 units. Private recreational amenities including meeting room, pool, sand volleyball court, basketball court and jogging trail with arbor are provided on the site. The community will be private with an unmanned security gate entrance. Concurrency: Traffic: proj ect received original concurrency certification for 192 units in December 18, 1990, in connection with rezoning ~ Page 2 Memorandum #96-066 Driveways: Parking Facility: Landscaping: Building and Site Regulations: Community Design Plan: Signage: RECOMMENDATION: and master plan approval. The necessary master plan/zoning and concurrency certification extension granted on April 18, 1995, were met in connection with the master plan modification approved by the City Commission on December 19, 1995. Drainage: Insufficient drainage information has been submitted for the Engineering Division to certify compliance with the City's drainage levels of service at the time of site plan approval when it is required. The Engineering Division is recommending that this be postponed to the time of permit review. Ingress/egress to the project is provided by a driveway located on Knuth Road extended. Knuth Road an eighty (80) foot wide city right-of-way will be developed with a north and south bound turn lane into the site. The on-site entrance includes two lanes each for ingress and egress separated by a landscaped median. The 192 dwelling units and recreation facilities require 409 parking spaces. There are 414 parking spaces proposed. Following compliance with staff comments, the landscape plan will be in compliance with the code and conditions of master plan approval. The height and location of the residential buildings and recreation facilities are in compliance with the regulations established on the master plan. The design of the residential buildings is unique in that there are several different architectural features, shapes and colors proposed to provide a distinction between the attached units that make up a building. This design and color scheme is shown on the display that will be presented at the meeting. The sign program includes two project entrance signs that will be mounted to a six (6) foot tall structure located on each side of the ingress/egress. The shape of the structure includes a radius top with decorative columns at each end. The finish will be stucco with a color that will match the existing color scheme used on the residential buildings. The signage will be non-illuminated raised letters with no ground lighting shown. The Planning and Zoning Department recommends approval of this site plan request, subj ect to the comments included in Exhibit C - Administrati ve Conditions. The TRC recommends that the deficiencies identified in this exhibit be corrected on the set of plans submitted for building permit. MEH:dim xc: Central File A:STAFREPT,TAR !J EXHIBIT "A" f II I j ~ I~ LC- CATION MAP TARA OAKS ir.'~'- - - - - i~1 I' III r-- -.U La I r l> -- ..0 ... AG Ic<:..... "" '..Jy', I - , ~~.. ........'lo ~ ......~ ...,. ,~ . . -.' '_" .~:::J f-+~[~~~~'tU CANA....~... ~~-.;.., . .- : : '''r :':Tr'''T''~-' ~', ~ c = ". H~.,..ON' BM'CH-~/--;;nl- - , T11='" "\ ( ._~, I r- I II I I. . I ..1' I j P rrrr t::~ c~"", : f! , 1= E I ~ I,.:' III U !' ! .. .s t= " 1 li-11r :~L -- J5t C- . : .:\!UO::: I ~. PC D OX,- ,-., I fjl1~ i' ( W _ ~~ ~. ~c m . , ijl1IT~: ,~~~ ~ ~~~I~'~ ,; ,.. ~.~~~:' . ilJJ8c I ,_ l<--:iJ ~ \ I\. _~~ I ~'-rIiQ~> · l - ---- If '1Ill-- = I '''-- '?J ,~ \' tr' ;~~~t.~-m ~ 'l. \ : ';;::=/' ~: '0i~-7' I · 1\' t:J~'-IIII~~1I a f-- , I . ~ _ I . \ .I! ...r, ~ . i I I'):~'f- [ ;" , '1 r--J- 't.- pN ,.,',. ,y::. ", R ~ R a,:'c , ~.. L::. ~ 'i {.r" ~ 0 . =: ; I'U' \~ II '"::I " r- ,'-1 1111Jl.= ~ \ v fi'IJ V' : - :---.-.: : :,<D II ~ 1,,' J I'll '--}'-~:':r--:':" ; L ~ .....~",NnT', i~--~~~J i I """'- r...:,~:~,. 11111 ... - r :..;lY: '. ;.:~ s' L,:",~ ....---::~.w _"~I 1i:-2"4-u - -. L.... .~( ';:I . ~ ~ . " "'~ ('.:-=-~ r '---"1 ,) -., i<. III 1fT - ,l & ~: t\.... \ I - ,,~ ' r...... u~ :: ~ \ ( ....~ . "'- L..i <:( , : :, I:' '-., \ .:'\..'-",. -,... .,.. ID;-- ~ ..O~.. Irh--.. .,' . I: ,': \~~,' ... . ,:', I - 1 t 11 t I It!. . , -.- -1i ~- \! ~., ..,.__ . ~ I: ,.:J-' I U'; - ~~ . , .. '11-'" .> /~ .___ ',: ~ .... ,- Lr./- ~. L (.' ~/ " ':. "j ~:--~.__ _: '<: '>. " 'rr'\."'l' , ,+;~.' .. ':" ~ \.- --v /: ":: '~, ') ~ , " .......,...' /?. ,-.. . 1;---11 ~')' ....l... ~ i! /(r'~~ ,J ~ \..... ,,0.. .' ~I ~ --, :". . " . ,.-" -- ------.' ( . / v It. ; ;' . -! : .. ~l( r. PLH::J..... ~ \ ' ': ' - " , : " .~ - J . . 4~':f_ : I:: '~....... \ _I w ': . _,_ { '.' : ....1..J?..,' ES OF .- ; : ~]TITT ': '._ << ~ \ ~ l~' ...~=.;:;...)-:r --.!..... ~ 1 ::1.,-- ; 0 . f 'I~ ~~c -: -I '\~ \; ~ ,\: i-J~~ ;:A..~~] ~ -<<.YYE; -.. : 1 . -''V' ~ ____.)l ~~ <2J;::~ :~~ > " '~T 1= . .~ .:;:.!t---5o-----"'~- ',(uu;"-.-.::. --c~-~"':~- ....- -- -- .'... '--'. --,,-. I I q-1 l' ":JI~J";. _...-----...-. ~ ''YO ot...BR.J~-1?QAD :'0: erry L.I"'1fr5-7/ ~J---- .----, :J' I SW' /: r- . @ # -- ~ 1 ~ u' L .4.I11 , ~ . \~. _ ...- \,', ._ ;: ~ ~ I ii:::....~1 \' ~t::::3: . '\ \V ,'.,' .C I: - _ ~ ~II ~ . ,.,rI::n...I. i ~:: m ~ ~ 'I I, - . l ~;,: !~....- ~;,,: _. ~ i ! I \1 ~ ~ (';' d "'\~' ~J .' Ii =: - '!5,,! H -. '~~l ~I I f ~ l \1 ~r.s.I I I ,~'J.;\K~' / . ...[ III ..c ~ ~I L- !, L ..I') ( F . ,): X = ~I ,',~ ~ l.;:~;' \ ~. f- 0 \ t) I \.~"""'" .....' '. ~~ f- 'crtm" \ \ 'IJ ~ / .i, ::... "~' ffi'""tL-. : J / I' . """h~ ~"" N t .. ~I A ".".'~' ~~n I ::..: '3 . i I'll .-.Nl I .0 C1 ~~:) [- c~~~..<==" -L' 7 _ ~," \ \ \ 1\ ii' :...1 ,I !:: '.---~-:-v"""'-~ ~JJ:jj~ \~~~'; ',' ~~"(i( ~ R3 " ~ o 1/,8 MILES ~.' =" , " y --,:'-'''' ~g 'IDle ~ I~l H~ I " , '1'1111 I'. \\ ~ ~~. ~ I~ !,~ == ~~~:-'-'Tll~J~T . -: If ~-r~r:"?\ ,-- - g'" '.0 .400, "800 FEET - 6 r-- ~ '<.4..... '. '., ~y ~:'~ .:: ~~ l'lt 1 j .. t- P1.A ~NI/'J ,:_ VEil 7. J ~, I- ~ 'l~~ - /~.i~ r-~~ ~_ ~ . I J ~, j .. , .. I I-~......... ,~.~. of-. ;, -.-J It 'J --..~.. r , t-- I' , .... -r4oj. ) .! I' " ii r~( .: // rr In..: Ji~. __..!L.-- U ~ -:::- ". Ifr/ fl' I I~ 11 T il I I r Lt;~ S,' r-- -J 5 "".- -- ~i 'I I; PC E X H I BIT "B" (p I'i ' I,' .. = . , I' ill'~' i' fi , H'l; I l' , ;! ! J : I I .'.II! jilf~; II. . J : I I :~. I' .. . i' I I h:.I~'!hl!1 ,: H~il~ Hi!:1 I ::of$o; !s.!.! I; I.!~ ~j!'H! &.e.:i ~ot !"5~E.! :'1~ ~ ,,& I .2~ (f) ~Jl i' ~ . - ill; H '" 'I :~~ ~ i~lah 1;1 ~ la ~ , Q~-!= ,d.hl!. .t" I if ~ ! Jg~ 0 ~t'.H'i= .:. i .~ "! . ~ 5 ~~'.o!,~ Hi . I. Ei I ~ 0 ~IhjHl ;ii ; !~ ~ I ill c lit o.!. S - t .J ~ o ll'&"'hl iJ.e f =1 ~ ~ i.lh:lu i.1 I !i ~ d ~ -: IjJ 0 i lli ~ h ~ ~g~ (f) hip:l! Iii ; !~ i ~~%~~ ' J-" ~I- l Ii i~~"(f) l~dhi;S at I :. lIE .8!~ Iii "')')I.!lP".~___--=== ~~ :!:4 --, is' -, !-. ~~~ ~ .n:::'~ ...7i'" ::-:::~ ~~~ , 'J! ~:r~ .!.::- "'2~ eo,,,,'OtII lK.v.H 8Oulll'Nl ; n!l. - i t5 .= \ ~~;, ~!m a. "'" . .~ if " . .r'" ;t~ ~3 :5ilL. I'" o.J~.n O!.....,IO ~~i'.i:~.. ~1t'liJ-~ i~.- ~~~ ~::i i: "'1-; ., i~: , ; i~ : ;!i :~.:....( b~! J~'" ;il~ ; !i i... ~~~t =~li ~~i~ =, "',~ ~" :, A~S ~ :~.;r ~.. g~i. . t~ iH1 ~;:~ l~~ ~., .,e~ ~ ...$. ~ :~~ :: ;;~ ~ ,~! L J f w _ ~ ~ b ij ....... ,t :. " !fi z ::s [l. w t- - CJ) C W "' u .; ~ !I"' a: 2 N l"~~~ 7 i~' t:'~, i~~~~'" ~cHj~ :~~~~:i u i ~ ~ '\ . _u o. ~. I ~~. a:~!tI .. !i' r ~ R iis i ~:: ~~~i I; ~!:. L ~~I?.,. L! ~, ~:", "'-f'.:j, I~ . ~i r----' (/ILl. .~TI ."' g _.._n_.:_~9"":9:~~~ . l.... t ....,'1 ",u:H5. 1'/1 ,,-~----- i t~t~ ; .._..~ ~~~~ , ~ i i j ~:. J~i~ i ~eiMrr~ : ~1~jbUml , " ~ irul . ! 2 ", i Ih~'I~~r' , i~bWr .~.a i l!~~~~~,!Ei , i!tl~'~;n. i ie~bihbal II~'~ ~ ~~i ~ ,I'__~.:_-: - '.: !!~, !J I ;'f , i,' :~~ ~~ ~_" at 81 ! -- ~:: II lr ! ~~;~ t:ali I ~~~. ...U, I ~ia ~::~a. G..," (.-':"1 ~ j ~~ ~~~ij H~H! ...:J.1...~Je~~! ~l!I~i! o ~~=U~~~. a~il~U ill I'~~t'% '.~ ~~!~.e'l t:: ~ .;':i i ~ [::o.Hl 't ~ Wf:)" if) E~2 ~ ~ ! e~ ~~ ~ . - ~ ~~ ~ t:: ell. .... '-i~~~i ~:j~~; H8.,,~ 2 ;nO: t, ~ ~~ ~ t . ~ ~ - 11'". c=~", i~" .ft ih iH ~ .... ~ L~ ~g ~ Ii! ~Ic ~." :c .. '- ~:j; : " .. (/) o 01 <t o Z <t t- (/) ci :j n: (/) '1L <t o <t 01 <l. I- s,," '1 !. t ~H "I ~ ui . ~ l i!~t II ~!_ ,11 . . $ I! , ~.' u 2 ~ t E . . !t~ :ii~ ~ 0 f ~ ~ ~ ,. fl :4 <l a! PJH <l . -~ ~ ~ U :J e;! (Jl <;j <l ~ I! "t ~~ ~ .~il' .... Ill! .' ~;>~~~Ii ~~~ l!;l ~~~~~~ . ~~~:~~ fi ~ ~ ~ ,0 ~ ~i ~ d i . h~! ~n I! ~~~~~~~ ~H :'i ~~:~lA~~ ~".o .h~z~~ ~~,~ ~~ ~m...~ H~n ~ ~ ::.' 'f; ^ . ~ ~ 1 il~ , :61 i ; lfi!i 1.11U.h tl1 ~;~\H I} ~ .i~' 0- ! ~ ~.rtH of ~ i~h ! t'i : 0 ~ i i n r-:'~o~ r;t.s! ~}' IU'l li~i v.:; Hit i~~lU H.!ti!l!li ii:ltS.l~q~~ ~~l1f~~~it:: ~~~~~ lo~t~l !]~i e . !~i:1 or':~~,!. I~~~~t o "1 ('oj ~ ~~ lY 00 Zeo o i . ~ .,j ',.d oil "~lli!_ ~ , :1~ill w J dihl ~ I " ~ Ii C" S! d I n ~iai i~ ~5~1 ~; 5ni ..S 2'" I ~ f ~ - i iJ s d i ~ 0" I · ~ ~ ~~ s ~ I 14 e~.. i t -f 0 i -I ~ ~ ~'" ~ ~~I ! lh~ ~~;i~~ - ~~~.. S'~i'~ ~ aId II-iEi ~ ill i%~~a ~~~~9~ j~~~ ~8~~~i2jU~~~ ~:i\ll!;:l2~!lh~92 ~;ji9~2g:'l~~~i~ i:t~~2,..;...s-.a"~>4ig ~ .. II: C o ..0: ....... - VI .2]cu g==~ ...e_ It ~ a.. l ~ -0: E C o'lS ~2~1 o 001 >- u L.&..-c o VI -0 ." -... - CIil:'::" :2 .3 ~~~ ~ t::> ~ tn <ll bid .-.40 ~ ~ o ~ v <:t (l; c::: == < i i . ~ i i n ~ ~I l....t-, :5~g~'ilil "',-..-. -i ~,,~ @ :1' :! !: ~ t : ,i I. "IF .Itltl' '-"-'- ~LJ ~~ ~~~? .~'~=.1 -'1 ,~~-= I ._3_,.-J~ IJJ~I~~, 'S I! ~O>~~~~; · ~';'''IZl! l4=r~ I:lt I .! ~iz'i.c: lti-ctl G.iCJ_1 (J t: ...:': "'" fl: ~ '~Q~~.:::1c..... ~ i .. ~ - --- ~\ <t :5 1 ~ ~ii 'j it I~ ~! [J) nt -f (u iii U~ ',. z lHi ~ i ~ \" ~- o~ cf 51\ i ~.H...11 I i~t ...1 . . E' <l: L ;!t QI ;' j'j~(L~;i;~ ,. ~~ 1<t >:~~ i~~ <( I i~i~i\ ~~i 0 1 ~SE ~ I .0. < -,~t' UJ t .....- .':11. t-- ! ~~! l}l 'I~. , ~ii ~ ~ ~ :t~~I:'~~ ~~~ UJ I ~i~ ~';~1 ~ ! Ht ~ L g~ . I!:~ ~ ,;: ~. ~ r: ~; i ~ 2 '.- c::!: ~ ~ _~i ~ e lr.~ 3~ *!~~~;:; ~ ~ ~ ~~ 'J.~; 3 < : ,; . I roe", ~ lrli III ; ~;~:~~~ .J ! 1 ~ f = !; gli ~~ ~ H __J ! I i i;i ih :iif~. 0 I" ,~!~ - . w: ~ wiE! ,li .....:" I- ~: ii!i ~ i ;mi-i H~qiHniii 9 I , ! I!rit! I ~ ~ 1:IUli II ~8R ~.* wNm.. ~ I '" ,Sib I -h ft ~ ~o~ . n >- :! L I- . H i ~ i i & . . i ~ ~r~ .j~j~ \: ! ia~~' i ~i ~. ':i'~ r ....Ii .>,~ "~"~.,'Xl \..I=.tlC,I't=,. .:..;.;: = ...c!.,,~ ii il-i 'f~.,~ ': ,,,=.'. '-'.i~' \'~H !.':'l" ~i i~~. .all~~: ~~~i ~~~;i'il \~ '" L l~; 2~;i~~. r~!~ ~~t~!~! \~"~ ~~!E .~~ Ih ::;,imi I, ~t ~ !-';;, t.': : i~~~ z;~~~!! \~r mm~ ~ '.: ;!~:~~~~ ~.l t. ....__ ; +- ;l- E X H I BIT "c" ~ EXHIBIT "C" Administrative Conditions Project name: TARA OAKS PUD File number: NWSP 95-011 Reference:23 sheets submitted by Kilday and Associates identified as 2nd review plans with Planninq and Zoninq Department January 12. 1996 date stamp markinq I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I PUBLIC WORKS Comments: 1. Service, as requested, can be provided to site, however Public Work staff thinks this is the least desirable service. UTILITIES Comments: 1. Please provide water meter size and locations (Sec. 26.16 (c) ) . 2. Final engineering drawings must show water services and sanitary sewer service clean outs. 3. Please move the proposed water main shown under the proposed basketball court to a point north of that court. Unobstructed access to utility facilities must be provided, (Sec.26.33(a)) . 4. The Utilities Department will require the use of epoxy lined ductile iron pipe in that portion of the proposed gravity sewer shown under the proposed basketball courts, (Sec.26.33(b)) . 5. Utilities requests a meeting with the applicant and or the design Engineer to discuss utility relocations and permit applications to HRS. I FIRE I I Comments: NONE I POLICE I I Comments: NONE ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 6. If street lighting is provided, establish deed restrictions providing for a property owners association to pay for the operation of the system within the development. Chap.6, Art.III,Sec.14,pg.6-4 and Chap.5, Art. 5,Sec.2A4,pg. 5-9 (Acknowledged Aug. 31, but not verified) 7. Need SFWMD & LWDD acceptance prior to Engineering approval. Chap. 6, Art. VI I, Sec.4B,pg.6-24. (Acknowledged on Aug. 31, but not verified) q Page 2 of 8 Administrative Project name: File number: Conditions TARA OAKS PUD NWSP 95-011 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 8. Permits must be obtained for work with R.O.W. Chap.22,Art.II,Sec.7A,pg.22, Art.II,Sec.7A,pg.22-3. (Acknowledged on Aug. 31, but not verified) 9. Revise documents to reflect all comments. 10. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are limited to the following; site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and traffic control devices. Permits required from agencies such as the FDOT, PBC, SFWMD and any other permitting agency shall be included with your permit request. 11. Parking lot section must conform to City code. Chap.6,Art.IV,Sec.10F, pg. 6-12 12. Provide details for pavement, grates, pipes, catch basins, etc. Chap.6, Art.V, Sec.4B2e,pg.6-20 13. Location of proposed curbs is not clearly defined on the drawing. Chap. 23 , Art.I,Sec.sBls,pg.23-s 14. Provide stop signs and stop bars in accordance with the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices". Chap.23,Art.IIB2,pg.23-7 15. Wheel stops or curb required, all stalls. Chap.23,Art.IIE,pg.23-7 16. Provide 27' backup area, all stalls. Chap.23,Art.II,I1,pg.23-9 17. Provide certified statement that Knuth Road will be completed prior to the issuance of initial certificate of occupancy. 18. Identify maintenance berms and indicate slopes. Chap.6,Art.IV,Sec.sB,pg.6-9 19. Provide cross section and details of proposed construction of Knuth Road. Chap.6,Art.V,Sec.4B,pg.6-19 20. Place a statement on documents that perimeter hedges will be a minimum of four feet high within one year of planting. Chap.7.s,Art.II,Sec.s,pg.7.s-1s&16 2l. We do not know what the developer is obligated to do at the dead-end created on Congress Blvd. , but it should be resolved. We hope that all roadways will be constructed in two lifts, and if accomplished, we will not hold up certificates of occupancy solely for final lift. /0 Page 3 of 8 Administrative Project name: File number: Conditions TARA OAKS PUD NWSP 95-011 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 22. All buildings and signs must comply with applicable codes. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: NONE FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: 23. In accordance with the Preserve Management Plan for the project, section 4, pg. 9 Scrub Restoration and Relocation Methodoloqy lIa detailed design of relocation specifications will be submittedll.. .This portion of the plan should be completed by the applicant prior to securing the clearing/grubbing permit. 24. The tree survey indicates the following trees/quantities: 33 Oak - relocated into preserve area if outside site 5 Palmetto, Palm - relocated into preserve area if outside site 13 Pine - left in preserve area or others replaced with new trees for no net loss of trees shown on landscape plan 25. Any other sections of the Preserve Management Plan document which require coordination with the City should be completed prior to or part of the clearing/grubbing permit. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 26. Provide computations to verify the 9.5 units/acre overall PUD density identified on the sheet titled "Final Site Development plan" . Also, indicate on the plan the land use classification of the subject site and the maximum units per acre allowed as indicated on the land use map. 27. The approved master plan specifies the setback for all recreation amenities except the recreation building shall be 25 feet. Indicate on the plan a 25 foot setback dimension from the south property line to the arbor. I , Page 4 of 8 Administrative Project name: File number: Conditions TARA OAKS PUD NWSP 95-011 DEPARTMENTS 28. On sheet A-2, add to the design of the rear elevation of all of the residential buildings that are visible from the adjacent public right-of-way (Knuth Road) and private street (Edgewater Drive) to the north and west raised stucco bands and louvers at both 1st and 2nd floors). [Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan, Section 11 I] 29. On sheet A-2, specify the color of the material shown on the gable end of the 2nd floor of the front elevation on the building by identifying the color name, color designation (letters and/or numbers) and manufacturer of the color. 30. Specify on the "Final Site Development Plan" the width dimension of the landscape islands located within the vehicle use area. Note: All dimensions shall be consistent with code regulations. 31. Specify on the "Final Site Development Planll the width dimension of the landscape islands located within the vehicle use area. Note: All dimensions shall be consistent with code regulations. 32. Add to the drawings the buffer wall and landscaping required on the north side of the LWDD Canal L-2s. The wall and landscape material shall be consistent with the previous approved agreement between the property owner of the subject property and the adjacent property owner's association. 33. Specify on the IIFinal Site Development Plan" that the basketball court will not be illuminated. 34. On landscape plan sheet 2 of 10, place a typical on center spacing dimension and note describing the spacing requirements for the two rows of mahogany trees shown along the north property line. Both rows of trees shall be spaced thirty (30) foot on centers. The tree location shall be staggered to provide the effect of fifteen (15) feet on center separation. Also, add to the sheet a typical dimension indicating the required thirty (30) foot on center spacing for the trees shown on the plan located on the north side of the LWDD Canal L-2s. I~ INCLUDE REJECT Page 5 of 8 Administrative Project name: File number: Conditions TARA OAKS PUD NWSP 95-011 I DEPARTMENTS 35. Provide the computations showing compliance with the landscape code (section 5.8.) regarding required landscape area for interior parking spaces. Also, provide the computations to verify that the number of trees indicated on the plan meet the interior parking area landscape requirements. [Chapter 7.5, Article II - Landscape Code of the City's Land Development Regulations] 36. Provide the computations to verify the 175 trees indicated on the landscape data meet the general landscaping requirement providing one (1) tree per one thousand five hundred (1500) square feet of developed area. [Chapter 7.5, Article II - Landscape Code of the City's Land Development Regulations, Section s.K.] 37. Correct the inconsistency with respect to the 886 total number of trees proposed in the landscape data versus the 648 total number of trees identified on the plant list. 38. To form the proper continuous vegetative screen along the east and west property lines of the project, adjust the plant specifications as follows: i. Change the height specification of the Crown of Thorns from 16 inches to 18 inches; ii. Change the on center spacing of the Split Leaf Philodendron from 36 inches on center to 24 inches on center. 39. Delineate on sheet 6 of 10 the limits of the plant material identified on the plan as CHR1 and located east of the basketball court (Note: As part of the approved master plan this 36 inch tall plant material shall extend a distance of 20 feet north and south of the basketball court). 40. Place a typical dimension of forty (40) feet on center for the trees along the east property line (similar to the spacing note shown along the west property line) . /3 I INCLUDE I REJECT I Page 6 of 8 Administrative Project name: File number: Conditions TARA OAKS PUD NWSP 95-011 DEPARTMENTS 41. To properly screen the vehicle use area from being viewed from the south property line, show on the landscape plan and include in the landscape data and plant list a continuous hedge row along the south property line of the site. The hedges shall be spaced a maximum of two (2) feet on center and at least one-half of the total number of plants shall be a native specie. The minimum height following planting shall be eighteen (18) inches. No less than the minimum plant height and spacing shall be identified on the plant list. Use a symbol to delineate the required material on the landscape plan and plant list. [Chapter 7.5, Article II - Landscape Code of the City's Land Development Regulations, Section s.E.] 42. To be consistent with the approved master plan regarding landscaping along the east and west property lines of the subject site, modify the tree species along the west property line to specify and show no less than one (1) native evergreen large canopy tree spaced eighty (80) feet on center (the tree species and spacing along the east property line meet the approved criteria). Note: The black olive trees are not native, red tree oleander trees are not native and are not considered a large canopy tree, ligustrum trees are not native and are not considered a large canopy tree and dahoon holly trees are native, however, they are not considered a large canopy tree. The only tree located along the west property line that meets the above criteria are the gumbo limbo trees. 43. Either place a note on the "Final Site Development Plan" indicating that the off-site wall and landscaping required as part of the agreement between the subject property owner and the Stonehaven Homeowner's Association are shown on sheet 2 of 10, and will require city review of working drawings or show and describe the wall and landscaping on the "Final Site Development Plan". 44. Add to the landscape plans landscape drawings of the detention area, jogging trail preservation and relocation area. These drawings shall be included with the permit drawings and an additional set of drawings shall be submitted directly to the Planning and Zoning Department. 45. With a distinguishable symbol show and label on the "Final Site Development Plan" the location and type of curbing required to protect the landscaping and meet city standards. If INCLUDE REJECT Page 7 of 8 Administrative Project name: File number: Conditions TARA OAKS PUD NWSP 95-011 I DEPARTMENTS 46. Contact the post office to determine the method of postal service and specify and/or show same on the "Final Site Development Plan". 47. The emergency access detail drawing found on the "Final Site Development Plan" depicts a berm along the west property line. Identify a symbol on the landscape plans that represent the berm and specify the height of the berm for the entire site. 48. To verify that the proposed trees and shrubs are not located in easements show on each landscape drawing a symbol that represents all easements. Also specify the type and size of the easement. 49. Correct the inconsistency between the number and configuration of trash collection areas identified on the "Final Site Development Plan" and the number and configuration of the areas shown on sheet 2 of 10, 3 of 10 and 5 of 10. 50. Correct the inconsistency between the acreage and square footage identified on the survey and the acreage and square footage identified in the "site data found on the "Final Site Development Plan". 51. Correct the parking calculations for the game court found on the "Final Site Development Plan". Using a scale the area of the basketball court is 4,700 square feet which requires 4 parking spaces, however the plan specifies 2 parking spaces. Amend all parking calculations accordingly. 52. The master plan shall be modified to receive unconditional sign-off by all Technical Review Committee members. RECOMMENDATIONS: 53. It is recommended that the design of the front and left side of the recreation building be enhanced by adding architectural amenities and design features that are shown on the residential building (such as raised stucco bands and/or louvers). Also, identify the compass direction for each side of the building. 15 I INCLUDE I REJECT I Page 8 of 8 Administrative Project name: File number: Conditions TARA OAKS PUD NWSP 95-011 DEPARTMENTS 54. It is recommended that the access to the trash collection areas be made via a sidewalk connection away from the vehicle use area rather than the gate access opening onto the vehicle use area as shown on the plans. It appears as though the trash collection areas, as shown, will allow gates to open into the vehicle use area and promote vehicles stopping at these areas to drop-off trash. It is further recommended to provide a more functional trash recovery area. These areas should be either relocated and combined into walk-in dumpster enclosure areas, or combined into one large drive-up/walk-in compactor area and that recycling containers also be provided at the site. We concur with the Public Works Department's concern that an inadequate number of trash collection facilities is proposed. 55. It is recommended that the City process an abandonment application to abandon S.W. Congress Boulevard west of Tara Lakes Drive West. MEH/dim a:ComDept2,TAR/p&d /(, INCLUDE REJECT TRACf::lNG 1 .i - 8I'l'E PLAN REVIEW 8UBMI AL PRUJI::C'l' 'l'l'rLE: DE::iCRIP'l'ION: 'l' Y P E : X DA'l'E REC I D: TARA OAKS NEW SITE PLAN NEW SITE PLAN 11/28/95 AMOUNT: FILE NO.: NWSP 95-011 MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION 1500.00 kECEIP'r NO.: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TWELVE (12) SETS SUBMITTED: COLORED ELEVATIONS RECID: I~j;f (Plans shall be pre-assembled. The Planning & Zoning Dept. will number each sheet of their set. The planniQg Dept. set will be used to check the remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match.) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * APPLICATION & SUBMITTAL: DATE: ACCEPTED 11/28/95 DENIED DATE: DATE OF LET'rER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES: 2nd SUBMIT'I'AL ACCEPTED DENIED DATE: DATE: DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER: REVIEWER'S NAME: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * , (Label TRC uepartments on each set of plans) DATE AND MEMO NUMBER OF MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW. DATE SEN'l': /11c2? RETUkN DATE: !d-.//} MEMO NUMBER: 95-~ 1st REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED util. P.W. Parks E'ire Police PLANS MEMO # / DATE / "C" q5'~ 3:J(; / IJ-! I { / ~ %:;- ~\.X3 / 1,;;..1' / ~ -L- ~~'$"j~ / ~/-k.- ~ _ ~3 _ / --:-lJj.i.L1 c- I Q!fn I~/~ PLANS Planning Building Engineer Engineer forester ~. /" 'I MEMO # / DA'l'E or;-7J3 / jJ/j..-, ~,<-(<.o- / /d.f7 < v.'-f?( / I,:;'.' i5 / . '15-573 / /2/ if / "CII / ,:- I~ / er- /- I f/ y TYPB OF VARIANCE(S) DA'l'E OE' MEETING: DATE OF LETT~R SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS: (Aesthetic Review App., dates of board mtgs. u checklist sent out w/ comments NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID: DATE 12 COMPLE'I'E SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW: I-/J. 9G (Must be assembled. Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents) COLORED ELEVATIONS REC I D: MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM 2nd REVIEW. C". DA'l'E SENT: \-'9-CIL~ MEMO #: ci'(o--O').~ RETURN DATE: \ - :.:J.b- qh 2nd REVIEW RECOMMENDATION/DENIAL PLANS MEMO # / DATE /"R/D" PLANS ...... Util. Y ~O~ / 1/2.." / c....- v' Planning . P.W. -.:Y- . /#" /~ -Building Y tParkS -.:t- . ,OJ. / J.. / (Y '-, Engineer ./J Fire &f~ . ~o3/ I / C/ Engineer - Police Y ~03 / II J. / c... Footer y <4- 9(,-033 ~ /; tp c.- ...... (2.(\,/ 1"\(l,-iL- LETTER TO APPLICANT REGARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS PLACED AT THE PROPERTY DATE SENT/SIGNS INSTALLED: .-1 /; ? / c; t I MEMO # / lri:i I - 3 / / / ,'\, ". "".' ~ j"L~ -~';- r / DATE /"R/D" ')./~11> / ::." 1I.2~ / c.- t( f\J-. / (1/ '-' . / t (~.. ',,-i'I,: / '\ , oi;h ~,lr7 SCHEDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD CC/CRA DAT~ APPROVAL LETTER SENT: A: 'l'kACKINli.::if' t %e City of 'Boynton 'Beach 100 'E. 'Boynton 'Bead;' 'Boukvara P.O. 'Boi(31O 'Boynton 'Bead;', ~Coritfa 33425-0310 City:Jfa{[: (407) 375-6()()() ~JU: (407) 375-6090 December 20, 1995 Kieran J. Kilday Kilday and Associates, Inc. 1551 Forum Place, Suite 100A West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 RE: Initial Review Comments - Tara Oaks PUD File No. NWSP 95-011 Dear Mr. Kilday: The City of Boynton Beach has completed its first review of the documents submitted for the above-referenced project. Attached are comments made by the reviewing departments during their initial review of your project. In order to complete the review process, the site plan and documents must be amended to comply with these comments within 90 days of the date of this letter. (If amended plans are not submitted in 90 days, a new application fee will be required.) When there are comments made by the reviewers that you feel are not applicable to the approval of the project or will be addressed separately and you have not amended the plans to comply with the comment(s), you must prepare written explanation for each comment stating why the comment is not applicable and return the explanation with the amended plans and documents. After amending the plans and documents, please submit twelve (12) complete sets (including surveys) of the plans to the Planning and Zoning Department. When the amended plans and documents have been submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department, they will be distributed to the reviewing departments for second review and recommendation to the appropriate boards for approval or denial (see attached meeting schedule). A recommendation for denial will be made if there are major comments that have not been addressed on the resubmitted plans. We have also enclosed for your convenience an approval schedule and a checklist that contains information regarding the second submission of the plans and documents for review. 5lmerna's (jateway to the (julfstream Page 2 Tara Oaks PUD Initial Review Comments If you should have any questions regarding the comments or the approval schedule, please feel free to call Michael E. Haag, who is coordinating the review of your site plan for the Planning and Zoning Department. Very l. U.lY yours, ~jl}~ / >~.-> .. 11 '- I. r - CJ {7.0fL ~ Tam ri J. Heyden p~anning and Zoning Director TJH:dim Attachments A:lstComLt,Tar j 2. /4. 5 . CHECKLIST The following list and information is provided as a checklist to ensure that the submittal of amended plans and documents is substantially complete for review. Turning in this list and the appropriate plans and documents will enable the submittal to be efficiently checked prior to being accepted by the Planning and Zoning Department. Project Name: Tara Oaks PUD (File No. NWSP 95-011) 1. Submit an amended Site Plan Review/Conditional Use application form that reflects the changes that were made as a result of amending the plans and documents to comply with the Code of Ordinances and the Technical Review Committee comments. A copy of the original form with a distinguishable symbol identifying the change(s) may be submitted or a completed new form with the changes identified. If there are no changes required to be documented on the application form, a letter from the applicant stating same must be turned in with the amended submittal. Submit twelve (12) assembled and complete sets of plans and documents, including surveys that show compliance with the Code of Ordinances and comments made by the Technical Review Committee. Two (2) of the sets shall have the appropriate legible raised seal and signature of the designer responsible for the drawing(s). Plans and documents shall be assembled in twelve (12) individual complete packages with the title of the project on all pages and/or sheets and each page or sheet numerically numbered such as the following example: 1 of 3, 2 of 3, 3 of 3. 3. Submit color photographs of the buildings on the site that are to remain in their existing condition and photos of existing buildings that are located on the sites that abut the perimeter of the subject property. The minimum size is 5" by 7". Each photograph shall be labeled to identify the location of the existing structures with respect to the location of the proposed project. Submit colored elevation view drawings - a colored duplicate copy of all drawings of the elevation views of each side of all buildings and signage associated with the project. The colored elevation views shall match the elevations shown in the documents that were submitted for site plan review. The applicable exterior surfaces as identified above shall be colored with the color name and associated color reference number identified. The type of exterior surface material shall be identified next to the associated color. The colored elevation drawings shall have compass direction or title of the side of the building identified. The title block of the original drawing shall be shown. The maximum size is 24" by 36". Do not submit on board of any kind. Submit a 8 1/2" x 11" transparency of the landscape site plan drawing to be used on an overhead projector at board meetings. 1996 REVIEW SCHEDULE FIRST HALF SITE PLAN REVIEW AND CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL -PftOJBCTS LOCATBD WITHIN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ORIGINAL AMENDED CITY wCOMM REDEV SUBMITTAL PLANS wC.R.A.B. P&D COMMISSION AGENCY DEADLINE DEADLINE HEETING HEETING MEETING & HEETING Oct 23, '95 Dec 6, . '95 Jan 08 Jan 09 Jan 16 -~-'" _.;::-:-~ ~ ~ . ."--- Nov 28, '95 Feb 12 e3 ~'i Dec 21, '95 Feb 9 Mar 11 Mar 12 Mar 19 Jan 26 Mar 11 Apr 08 Apr 09 Apr 16 Mar 4 Apr 15 Hay 13 May 14 May 21 Mar 29 Hay 10 Jun 10 Jun 11 Jun 18 Apr 25 Jun 1 Jul 08 Jul 09 Jul 16 NOTE: (1) TO FACILITATE THE PROCESSING OF THE REQUEST, IT IS RECOHMENDED THAT THE APPLICANT SET-UP, BY APPOINTMENT, A PRE-APPLICATION MEETING WITH THE DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT (407) 375-6260 PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL DEADLINE DATE. THE MEEETING WILL ADDRESS CONCERNS REGARDING THE TYPE OF SUBMITTAL, BOARD REVIEW SCHEDULE, SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES, FEE, APPLICATION FORM, AND TYPE AND NUMBER OF PLANS/DOCUMENTS THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED. (2) IF A SUBMITTAL IS RECEIVED BY THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL DEADLINE DATE AND WITHIN TWO (2) WORKING DAYS FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL DEADLINE, THE SUBMITAL IS DETERMINED ACCEPTABLE FOR PROCESSING, THE SUBMITTAL WILL FOLOW THE APPROVAL SCHEDULE IDENTIFIED ABOVE. HOWEVER, IT SHALL BE NOTED THAT THE AMENDED PLANS DEADLINE DATE ALLOCATES ONLY TEN (10) WORKING DAYS FOR THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT A COMPLETE PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE PLANS THAT HAVE BEEN AMENDED TO COMPLY WITH THE TRC COMMENTS GENERATED fROM THE REVIEW OF THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS. TO kEEP TUB REVISW PROCESS ON SCHEDULE THE AMENDED PLANS DEADLINE DATB IS STRICTLY BNFORCBD. IT SHALL ALSO BE NOTED, THAT PRIOR TO A PROJ&CT aBING RIlCOMHIlNDIP rOR AP'ROVAL IV,.... PLANNING & ZONING DBPARTMBNT, AND ..%NG 'RI.INTIO TO THa P~ANNING & DRVILOPHBNT BOARD OR THB COMMUNITY RBDEVBLOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD, THE PROJECT SHALL BE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THB TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE. ( 3) APPLICATIONS WHICH REQUIRE SUBMITTAL OF A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS, PURSUANT TO THE MUNICIAPL IMPLEMENTATION ORDINANCE OF PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ORDINANCE REQUIRE ADDITIONAL REVIEW TIME. NOTE: REFER QUESTIONS REGARDING TRAFFIC TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. (4) THE ABOVE DATES MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. CONTACT THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY DATES. .1'....vlHf..C'w PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #96-008 100 rn 00 j JAN ? 3 1996 PL;U.;~ ..' '., _~r'JO .....,;....... _ zeH.,_.., c..t?T. TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: Site Plan Modification - Tara Oaks - 2nd Review DATE: January 23, 1996 In reference to the above site plan, can service, as requested by the applicant can be provided to this site, however I think this is the least desirable service. ert Eichorst ublic Works Director REier MEMORANDUM Utilities # 96-035 t~~ '~I ~ U ~ ~-m n1r"- " U \ '1'lS- I - PLANNING P,NO IONING DEPT. Date: January 25, 1996 TO: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: John A. Gui Director of SUBJECT: Tara Oaks, New Site Plan Modification, Second Review Staffhas reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: 1. Please provide water meter size and locations, (Sec. 26.l6(c)). 2. Final engineering drawings must show water services and sanitary sewer service clean outs. 3. Please move the proposed water main shown under the proposed basketball court to a point north of that court. Unobstructed access to utility facilities must be provided, (Sec. 26.33(a)). 4. The Utilities Department will require the use of epoxy lined ductile iron pipe in that portion of the proposed gravity sewer shown under the proposed basketball courts, (Sec. 26.33(b). 5. Utilities requests a meeting with the applicant and or the design Engineer to discuss utility relocations and permit applications to HRS. It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milar at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. sm tara2s xc: Clyde "Skip" Milar Peter Mazzella fo.i File FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-203 TO: Planning Department FROM: Fire Department DATE: January 29, 1996 RE: MPMD 95-007 Tara Oaks We have no objections. rn@ffiowrn .30" ill PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. /~~~~f William D. Cav augh, FPO I J \. cc: Chief Jordan FPO II Campbell File . BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT TO: FROM: DATE: REF: TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT. MARLON HARRIS 22 JANUARY 96 TARA OAKS - NEW SITE PLAN- 2nd REVIEW MEMO #0203 I bave reviewed tbe above plans and S;~:H~;P.h?bl~~::;i~::ilit~)iW;~: jjJ l;;:!:~~:;:;!~:,:::::;;~:~:';::;:;''''''''>' {",j' ,:::::::::,it~:l::t~:~:<\: .;:.;::: ~ :f .~...;;~.. ....::...;;::...;~)::. r'i:~~:;:;:::;:~:::::\ . . . . ~ ~:::::::::::::~:;;;::l :t~~:;::;:;:;:;::::~::~~~..l tJ r'f~::;::;:::~:;') ::: .......................-;... . .... " .. :~ ~................:.;...;.. '::;.. t~;::;:.:.::.::::;;:,,) ~~J r:;::::::;::::~:;~::':'~~ } 1~ :;;;:::;::::::::~..::~ /'~:'~:::::'';:::'' ~}) Ot~/'FJJ :~:',;4:' :{~l' i~;~j;lii<;i \;;Kl:f:;,:~r ~~ f6i ~~::" .-:::;, :~.:.:.:...:...;..::., r:::i;:l:;;::>:::::::::~~~:,~, \<> ii",..:!!, \,,:;::;;;:~::~:::::;:,/ TO: FROM: RE: RE: ~rna5~owrnoo DEP ARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT 1 ! ~ I I ') r u ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-034 '.I t JA~. o.~ I Pt 7!". '- , ~.~amtJ ri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director [~m Hukill, P.E., City Engineer January 26, 1996 TARA OAKS - THIRD SITE PLAN REVIEW We have again reviewed subject project utilizing our previous Memo 95-471 and find as follows: A. In compliance C. In compliance E. In compliance F. In compliance G. In compliance L. In compliance D. Unresolved. If street lighting is provided. establish deed restrictions providing for a property owners association to pay for the operation of the system within the development. Chap.6, Art.III, Sec.14, pg.6-4 and Chap.5, Art.5. Sec.2A4, pg. 5-9 (Acknowledged Aug. 31, but not verified) J. Unresolved. Need SFWMD & LWDD acceptance prior to Engineering approval. Chap.6, Art.VII, SecAB, pg.6-24. (Acknowledged on Aug.31, but not verified) K. Unresolved. Permits must be obtained for work within R.O.W. Chap.22, Art.II, Sec. 7 A. pg.22-3. (Acknowledged on Aug.31, but not verified) Several "additional" issues were listed on Memo 95-471. Their status is as follows: 2. 4. 5. 8. 11. l. 3. 6. In compliance In compliance In compliance In compliance In compliance Incomplete. Revise documents to reflect all comments. Incomplete. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following; site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and traffic control devices. Permits required from agencies such as the FDOT, PBC, SFWMD and any other permitting agency shall be included with your permit request. Unresolved. Parking lot section must conform to City code. Chap.6, Art.lV, Sec.lOF, pg.6-12 Unresolved. Provide details for pavement, grates, pipes, catch basins, etc. Chap.6, Art.V, SecAB2e, pg.6-20 7. Development Dept., Engineering Div. Memo No. 96-034 Re: Tara Oaks - Third Site Plan Review January 29, 1996 Page #2 9. Unresolved because no fmal site development plan was attached. Location of proposed curbs is not clearly defined on the drawing. Chap.23, ArtJ, Sec.5BI5, pg.23-5 12. Unresolved. Provide stop signs and stop bars in accordance with the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices". Chap.23, Art.IIB2, pg.23-7 13. Unresolved. Wheel stops or curb required, all stalls. Chap.23, Art.IIE, pg.23-7 14. Unresolved. Provide 27' backup area, all stalls. Chap.23, Art.II, n, pg.23-9 Other items requiring attention include the following: I. Provide certified statement that Knuth Road will be completed prior to the issuance of initial certificate of occupancy. II. Identify maintenance berms and indicate slopes. Chap.6, Art.lV, Sec.5B, pg.6-9 III. Provide cross section and details of proposed construction of Knuth Road. Chap.6, Art.V, SecAB, pg.6-19 IV. Place a statement on documents that perimeter hedges will be a minimum of four feet high within one year of planting. Chap.7.5, ArtJI, Sec.5. pg.7.5-15 & 16 We do not know what the developer is obligated to do at the dead-end created on Congress Blvd., but it should be resolved. We hope that all roadways will be constructed in two lifts, and if accomplished, we will not hold up certificates of occupancy solely for final lift. We recommend that this project move forward upon satisfaction of outstanding comments. WVH/ck C:TARAOAK3 BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-033 January 26, 1996 To: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director From: Al Newbold, Deputy Development Director Re: Tara Oaks Site Plan - 2nd Reveiw The Building Division recommends that the above referenced project proceed with the understanding that any further concerns be address at the time of permitting. All buildings and signs must comply with applicable codes. ~ . ..:. / .... ,,~ AINew~srld AN:mh Attachment: Site Plans for 2nd Review cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Director of Development TARAOAKS .MN 2 6 199) PLANNING A"JD ZONING DEPT. ill TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director John Wildner, Parks Superintendent .#J Tara Oaks I FROM: RE: DATE: January 22, 1996 The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the plan for Tara Oaks. There are no outstanding recreation issues on this project. We recommend that the plan continue through the normal review process. JW:ad RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #96-039 r[O)l rn @ rn ~ I'D rn ~\ 1lJ1l .JU'. ~I , . PlANNING A!IID I ZONING DEPT. . TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, F orester/Environmentalist 0: Tara Oak.. %nd Review (Site Plan Modlftcadon) I< /) 11- DATE: January 26, 1996 In accordance with the Preserve Management Plan for the project, section 4, pg. 9 Scrub Restoration and Relocation Methodoloay "a detailed design of relocation specifications will be submitted"... This portion of the plan should be completed by the applicant prior to securing the clearing/grubbing permit. The tree survey indicates the following trees/quantities: Species Quantity Comment Oak Palmetto,Palm Pine 33 5 13 *relocated into preserve area if outside site *relocated into preserve area if outside site *left in preserve area or others replaced with new trees for no net loss of trees shown on landscape plan Any other sections of the Preserve Management Plan document which require coordination with the City should be completed prior to or part of the clearing/grubbing permit. KH:ad PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-067 FROM: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director Michael E. Ha~~ Current Planning ~dinator February 9, 1996 TO: DATE: SUBJECT: New Site Plan - 2nd Review Project: Tara Oaks PUD Location: Northeast corner of Woolbright Road and Knuth Road extended Agent: Kilday and Associates, Inc. File No.: NWSP 95-011 The following is a list of comments regarding the second review of the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list of comments that identify unresolved comments either from the first review or new comments as a result of the second review. To show compliance with these comments will not substantially alter the configuration of the site and design of the building. The second category is a list of recommendations I believe will enhance the aesthetics and function of the project. All comments and recommendations can be rectified on the plans at time of permitting if the site plan request is approved. The applicant must understand that additional comments may be generated upon review of the documents and working drawings submitted to the Building Division for permits for the proposed project. I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: 1. Provide computations to verify the 9.5 units/acre overall PUD density identified on the sheet titled "Final Site Development Plan". Also, indicate on the plan the land use classification of the subject site and the maximum units per acre allowed as indicated on the land use map. 2. The approved master plan specifies the setback for all recreation amenities except the recreation building shall be 25 feet. Indicate on the plan a 25 foot setback dimension from the south property line to the arbor. 3. On sheet A-2, add to the design of the rear elevation of all of the residential buildings that are visible from the adjacent public right-of-way (Knuth Road) and private street (Edgewater Drive) to the north and west raised stucco bands and louvers at both 1st and 2nd floors) [Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan, Section 11 I] 4. On sheet A-2, specify the color of the material shown on the gable end of the 2nd floor of the front elevation on the building by identifying the color name, color designation (letters and/or numbers) and manufacturer of the color. s. Specify on the "Final Site Development Plan" the width dimension of the landscape islands located within the vehicle use area. Note: All dimensions shall be consistent with code regulations. 6. Add to the drawings the buffer wall and landscaping required on the north side of the LWDD Canal L-2s. The wall and landscape material shall be consistent with the previous approved agreement between the property owner of Page 2 Memorandum No. 96-067 2nd Review - Tara Oaks NWSP 95-011 the subject property and the adjacent property owner's association. 7. Specify on the "Final Site Development Plan" that the basketball court will not be illuminated. 8. On landscape plan sheet 2 of 10, place a typical on center spacing dimension and note describing the spacing requirements for the two rows of mahogany trees shown along the north property line. Both rows of trees shall be spaced thirty (30) foot on centers. The tree location shall be staggered to provide the effect of fifteen (15) feet on center separation. Also, add to the sheet a typical dimension indicating the required thirty (30) foot on center spacing for the trees shown on the plan located on the north side of the LWDD Canal L-2s. 9. Provide the computations showing compliance with the landscape code (section 5 . G. ) regarding required landscape area for interior parking spaces. Also, provide the computations to verify that the number of trees indicated on the plan meet the interior parking area landscape requirements. [Chapter 7.5, Article II - Landscape Code of the City's Land Development Regula t ions J 10. Provide the computations to verify the 175 trees indicated on the landscape data meet the general landscaping requirement providing one (1) tree per one thousand five hundred (1500) square feet of developed area. [Chapter 7.5, Article II - Landscape Code of the City's Land Development Regulations, Section s.K.J 11. Correct the inconsistency with respect to the 886 total number of trees proposed in the landscape data versus the 648 total number of trees identified on the plant list. 12. To form the proper continuous vegetative screen along the east and west property lines of the project, adjust the plant specifications as follows: i. Change the height specification of the Crown of Thorns from 16 inches to 18 inches; ii. Change the on center spacing of the Split Leaf Philodendron from 36 inches on center to 24 inches on center. 13. Delineate on sheet 6 of 10 the limits of the plant material identified on the plan as CHR1 and located east of the basketball court (Note: As part of the approved master plan this 36 inch tall plant material shall extend a distance of 20 feet north and south of the basketball court) . 14. Place a typical dimension of forty (40) feet on center for the trees along the east property line (similar to the spacing note shown along the west property line) . 15. To properly screen the vehicle use area from being viewed from the south property line, show on the landscape plan and include in the landscape data and plant list a continuous hedge row along the south property line of the site. The hedges shall be spaced a maximum of two (2) feet on center and at least one-half of the total number of plants shall be a native specie. The minimum height Page 3 Memorandum No. 96-067 2nd Review - Tara Oaks NWSP 95-011 following planting shall be eighteen (18) inches. No less than the minimum plant height and spacing shall be identified on the plant list. Use a symbol to delineate the required material on the landscape plan and plant list. [Chapter 7.5, Article II - Landscape Code of the City's Land Development Regulations, Section s.E.] 16. To be consistent with the approved master plan regarding landscaping along the east and west property lines of the subject site, modify the tree species along the west property line to specify and show no less than one (1) native evergreen large canopy tree spaced eighty (80) feet on center (the tree species and spacing along the east property line meet the approved criteria). Note: The black olive trees are not native, red tree oleander trees are not native and are not considered a large canopy tree, ligustrum trees are not native and are not considered a large canopy tree and dahoon holly trees are native, however, they are not considered a large canopy tree. The only tree located along the west property line that meets the above criteria are the gumbo limbo trees. 17. Either place a note on the "Final Site Development Planll indicating that the off-site wall and landscaping required as part of the agreement between the subject property owner and the Stonehaven Homeowner's Association are shown on sheet 2 of 10, and will require city review of working drawings or show and describe the wall and landscaping on the "Final Site Development Plan". 18. Add to the landscape plans landscape drawings of the detention area, jogging trail preservation and relocation area. These drawings shall be included with the permit drawings and an additional set of drawings shall be submitted directly to the Planning and Zoning Department. 19. With a distinguishable symbol show and label on the lIFinal Site Development Plan" the location and type of curbing required to protect the landscaping and meet city standards. 20. Contact the post office to determine the method of postal service and specify and/or show same on the lIFinal Site Development Planll. 21. The emergency access detail drawing found on the lIFinal Site Development Planll depicts a berm along the west property line. Identify a symbol on the landscape plans that represent the berm and specify the height of the berm for the entire site. 22. To verify that the proposed trees and shrubs are not located in easements show on each landscape drawing a symbol that represents all easements. Also specify the type and size of the easement. 23. Correct the inconsistency between the number and configuration of trash collection areas identified on the "Final Site Development Plan" and the number and configuration of the areas shown on sheet 2 of 10, 3 of 10 and 5 of 10. 24. Correct the inconsistency between the acreage and square footage identified on the survey and the acreage and square footage identified in the lIsite data found on the lIFinal Site Development Plan". .' . Page 4 Memorandum No. 96-067 2nd Review - Tara Oaks NWSP 95-011 25. Correct the parking calculations for the game court found on the "Final Site Development Plan". Using a scale the area of the basketball court is 4,700 square feet which requires 4 parking spaces, however the plan specifies 2 parking spaces. Amend all parking calculations accordingly. 26. The master plan shall be modified to receive unconditional sign-off by all Technical Review Committee members. II. RECOMMENDATIONS: 27. It is recommended that the design of the front and left side of the recreation building be enhanced by adding architectural amenities and design features that are shown on the residential building (such as raised stucco bands and/or louvers). Also, identify the compass direction for each side of the building. 28. It is recommended that the access to the trash collection areas be made via a sidewalk connection away from the vehicle use area rather than the gate access opening onto the vehicle use area as shown on the plans. It appears as though the trash collection areas, as shown, will allow gates to open into the vehicle use area and promote vehicles stopping at these areas to drop-off trash. It is further recommended to provide a more functional trash recovery area. These areas should be either relocated and combined into walk-in dumpster enclosure areas, or combined into one large drive-up/walk-in compactor area and that recycling containers also be provided at the site. We concur with the Public Works Department' s concern that an inadequate number of trash collection facilities is proposed. 29. It is recommended that the City process an abandonment application to abandon S.W. Congress Boulevard west of Tara Lakes Drive West. MEH:dim xc: Central File a: 2ndrecom. Tar ill m@~DW~ FIB , .. ill PLANNING AltO ZONING ;, DEPt PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #96-033 TO: Mike Haag, Zoning Site Administrator FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: Tara Oaks Trash Collection DATE: February 16, 1996 The Public Works Sanitation Division has what I feel serious concerns to this type of a garbage program. The concerns are not that we can't pickup their garbage but that this enclosure will only hold about 12 cans, which is far less than the number of units that will be using it, also the tenants will only be able to get to the two or possibly three cans that are located at the entrance to the enclosure. Ifbags are used, there will be several just thrown over the fence or stacked upon others which will result in broken bags and scattered garbage, and if the garbage becomes scattered by animals (raccoons, cats, etc.) who will be cleaning it up, I am sure that a tenant in a different building who does not have to look at the mess will be concerned. Personally I do not feel that this is the direction the City wants to go, however if this is approved the Sanitation Division can provide this type of service with the current residential can route. If you have any questions please give me a call. REier S~ 'v'~ . ~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-028 FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utility Dept. Chief Field Insp. Sgt. Marlon Harris, Police Department John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist William Hukill, Director Department of Development Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ~ January 19, 1996 TO: DATE: SUBJECT: New Site Plan Modification - 2nd Review Project: Tara Oaks Location: East side of Knuth Road approximately 600 feet north of Woolbright Road Agent: Kieran J. Kilday c/o Kilday and Associates, Inc. File No. : NWSP 95-011 Attached is the amended site plan submittal for the above referenced project for your final review and recommendation. We would ask that you review this amended site plan submittal to determine if the plans have been adjusted to satisfy comments previously made by your department. If your comments have been satisfied or if your comments can be met at time of building permit, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing. If your comments have not been met, please advise the Planning and zoning Department in writing. Finally, we would ask that you include in your memorandum a recommendation as to whether the project should be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board for consideration. Please return your memorandum and the amended plans (Engineering Division shall keep their plans) to the Planning and Zoning Department by 5:00 P.M. on January 26, 1996. If you should have any questions regarding this plan, please feel free to call Michael E. Haag at Extension 6260, who is coordinating the review of this project. cc: Carrie Parker, City Manager (Plans) (Memo Only) Floyd Jordan Charlie Frederick Tom Dettman John Guidry a:2ndRevwl.tar PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-733* FROM: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Z:~,lng ~f~ctor Michael E. Haag ~CJ Current Planning ~dinator December 26, 1995 TO: DATE: SUBJECT: New site plan - 1st Review Project: Tara Oaks PUD Location: Northeast corner of Woolbright Road and Knuth Road extended Agent: Kilday and Associates, Inc. File No.: NWSP 95-011 *Revised following TRC meeting of December 26, 1995. The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the site plan review of the plans for the above-referenced proj ect. It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list of comments that identify deficiencies from the City's Land Development Regulations (L.D.R.) that are required to be corrected and shown in compliance on the plans and/or documents submitted for second (2nd) review in order for the project to continue through the site plan review process. The second set of comment(s) lists recommendations that the Planning and Zoning Department staff believe will enhance the proposed development. The applicant shall understand that all documents and plans submitted for site plan are subject to additional comments. I recommend that the applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the comments. If the applicant is not intending to correct code deficiencies and they request that the project remain on the review schedule identified in the attached letter they should contact me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement. I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: 1. Remove from the final site development plan the text and symbol identified and shown as 25 foot landscape buffer easement (located along the north property line), 15 foot landscape buffer easement (located along the east property line) and the 10 foot landscape buffer easement (located along the west property line). 2. Adjust the south boundary line of the recreation tract to include all of the basketball court. 3. Remove from the final site development plan the 20 foot setback line shown along the south property line. 4. Establish the south perimeter building setback line (excluding the Arbor) as the south line of the recreation tract. Then in the area of the arbor specify setbacks for the arbor (see Exhibit flC" referenced in Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-698). 5. To establish the remaining floor area allowed in the PUD add to the LUI calculations the total floor area of the recreation building and the total floor area of all residential buildings including 1st and 2nd floor area. 6. Specify on the final site development plan the distance the emergency access columns are located from the west property line. Page 2 Memorandum No. 95-732 1st Review - Tara Oaks NWSP 95-011 7. Either reduce the size of unit types "Model 1227" and "Model 1228" or request a master plan modification to modify the building setbacks or increase the size of the depth of the lots. 8. On the floor plan sheets identify the overall front to back dimension of model unit 1227 and 1228. 9. On sheet A-2 change the design of the rear elevation of the residential building(s) by adding architectural amenities to enhance the character and definition of the rear elevation. [Chapter 9 Communi ty Des ign Plan, section 11 I] 10. On sheet A-6 change the design of the recreation building by adding architectural amenities and design features that are shown on the residential building. [Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan, section 11 I] 11. On sheet A-2 (residential building) specify the type of exterior material for the following building components that are depicted on the elevation view drawings: i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. vii. viii. ix. decorative shutters (windows) decorative shutter (radius - Model 1228) decorative columns decorative brackets unit - entry door 2nd floor gable (front elevation) decorative roof and features above entry door sliding glass door frames storage room door and roof 12. On sheet A-2 specify the color of the following exterior materials by identifying the color name, color designation (letters and/or numbers) and manufacturer of the color: i. ii. ii. iv. v. vi. vii. viii. ix. xi. xii. xiii. xiv. xv. xvi. fiberglass shingles wood fascia decorative shutters (windows) decorative shutter (radius - Model 1228) stucco band around the windows and doors decorative columns decorative bracket rough texture stucco unit - entry door 2nd floor gable (front elevation) decorative roof above entry door sliding glass door frames storage room door and roof decorative stucco detailing smooth texture stucco Note: Submit colored elevation view drawings of one of the residential building, the recreation building, one of the arbors, one of the emergency access gates and project signage. The colored elevation drawings shall identify each exterior material and identify the color by color name, color designation (letters and/or numbers and manufacturer of the color. The colors shown and identified on the colored elevation view drawings shall match the colors specified on the elevation view drawings that are required as part of the set of plans submitted for site plan review. Page 3 Memorandum No. 95-732 1st Review - Tara Oaks NWSP 95-011 13. On sheet A-6 (recreation building) the following exterior materials by name, color designation (letters manufacturer of the color: specify the color of identifying the color and/or numbers) and i. rough texture stucco ii. fiberglass shingles iii. wood fascia iv. hollow metal door frame and door 14. On both sheets identified as A1 (arbor) specify the color of the following exterior materials by identifying the color name, color designation (letters and/or numbers) and manufacturer of the color: i. rough sawn cedar beams and rafters ii. light texture stucco columns Note: Renumber the drawings to eliminate two Al drawings. 15. Submit for review enlarged scale detail drawings of the trash collector enclosure areas. The drawings shall be dimensioned and include plan, elevation and section view drawings which identify the finish materials and colors. Relocate the gates on the enclosures that the gates encroach into the vehicle use area. 16. Add to the final site development plan the narrowest dimension of the landscape strip required along Knuth Road. Note: All dimensions shall be consistent with code regulations. 17. Specify on the final site development plan the width dimension of the landscape islands located within the vehicle use area. Note: All dimensions shall be consistent with code regulations. 18. On the final site development plan identify the dimensions of the handicapped parking space and required access aisle. Note: All dimensions shall be consistent with code regulations. 19. On the final site development plan dimension the width of the two-way access aisles located east of the entrance drive that lead to the north and south portions of the site. Note: All dimensions shall be consistent with code regulations. 20. Add to the final site development plan a southbound left turn lane on Knuth Road into the project. 21. Add to the drawings the buffer wall and landscaping required on the north side of the LWDD Canal L-25. The wall and landscape material shall be consistent with the previous approved agreement between the property owner of the subject property and the adjacent property owner's association. 22. On landscape plan sheet 2 of 10 remove the palms shown along the north property line and replace with 2 rows of shade trees twelve (12) to fourteen (14) feet in height at time of planting located on thirty (30) foot centers. The tree location shall be staggered to provide the effect of fifteen (15) feet on center separation. Page 4 Memorandum No. 95-732 1st Review - Tara Oaks NWSP 95-011 23. Modify the plant lists by identifying all of the plant material that is located in the common area in one plant list and all of the plant material that is located on the individual lots in the other plant list. 24. Provide on each landscape plan that shows Knuth Road frontage a typical maximum dimension of 40 foot on center between the trees that are required to meet section 5.D. of the landscape code. 25. Provide the computations showing compliance with the landscape code regulations (Chapter 7.5, Article II - Landscape Code of the City's Land Development Regulations) regarding Sections S.G. and K. 26. To ensure that the proposed landscaping is in compliance wi th the landscape code regarding size " spacing and species delineate with the symbol on the plant list and the landscape plan the landscape material required to meet sections S.D, E, G, I, J and K of the landscape code. Note: One half of the total number of trees, hedges, vines and ground cover required to meet the code shall be a native specie. 27. Provide computations verifying that one-half of the total numbers of landscape material required to meet landscape code sections S.D, E, G, J, K and L are native. 28. Add to the plant list that identities the common ground landscape material the following text: liThe on center spacing of the trees and hedges/shrubs identified on the plans and/or plant list shall supersede the quantities of trees or hedges/shrubs referenced on the plan or plant list." 29. Modify the tree species along the east property line to specify and show no less than one (1) native evergreen large canopy tree spaced eighty (80) feet on center. 30. To comply with the conditions of approval for the project change the size of the red tip coco plum at the area of the east side of the basketball court from twenty-four (24) inches to thirty-six inches in height at planting. Also specify on the site plan that the basketball court will not be illuminated. 31. Specify on the elevation view drawings of the residential units and the recreation building the overall height from finish grade to the top of the ridge. 32. With a distinguishable symbol show and label on the site plan the location and type of curbing required to protect the landscaping and meet city standards. 33. Contact the Post office to determine the method of postal service and specify and/or show same on the drawings. Page 5 Memorandum No. 95-732 1st Review - Tara Oaks NWSP 95-011 34. The master plan shall be modified to receive unconditional sign-off by all Technical Review Committee members. Three sets of the rectified master plan documents which show compliance with the conditions of approval for the project are required to be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department. MEH:dim xc: central File Il:Tereaite 1st PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-733 FROM: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning ~tre~;9r Michael E. Haa~'B8.~(} Current Planning or inator December 20, 1995 TO: DA.TE: SUBJECT: New Site Project: Location: Plan - 1st Review Tara oaks PUD Northeast corner of Woolbright Road and Knuth Road extended Kilday and Associates, Inc. NWSP 95-011 Agent: File No.: The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the site plan review of the plans for the above-referenced proj ect. It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list of comments that identify deficiencies from the city's Land Development Regulations (L.D.R.) that are required to be corrected and shown in compliance on the plans and/or documents submitted for second (2nd) review in order for the project to continue through the site plan review process. The second set of comment(s) lists recommendations that the Planning and Zoning Department staff believe will enhance the proposed development. The applicant shall understand that all documents and plans submitted for site plan are subject to additional comments. I recommend that the applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the comments. If the applicant is not intending to correct code deficiencies and they request that the project remain on the review schedule identified in the attached letter they should contact me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement. I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: 1. Remove from the final site development plan the text and symbol identified and shown as 25 foot landscape buffer easement (located along the north property line), 15 foot landscape buffer easement (located along the east property line) and the 10 foot landscape buffer easement (located along the west property line). 2. Adjust the south boundary line of the recreation tract to include all of the basketball court. 3. Remove from the final site development plan the 20 foot setback line shown along the south property line. 4. Establish the south perimeter building setback line (excluding the Arbor) as the south line of the recreation tract. Then in the area of the arbor specify setbacks for the arbor (see Exhibit IIC" referenced in Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-698). 5. To establish the remaining floor area allowed in the PUD add to the LUI calculations the total floor area of the recreation building and the total floor area of all residential buildings including 1st and 2nd floor area. 6. Specify on the final site development plan the distance the emergency access columns are located from the west property line. Page 2 Memorandum No. 95-732 1st Review - Tara Oaks NWSP 95-011 7. Either reduce the size of unit types IIModel 1227" and IIModel 122811 or request a master plan modification to modify the building setbacks or increase the size of the depth of the lots. 8. On the floor plan sheets identify the overall front to back dimension of model unit 1227 and 1228. 9. On sheet A-2 change the design of the rear elevation of the residential building(s) by adding architectural amenities to enhance the character and definition of the rear elevation. [Chapter 9 Communi ty Des ign Plan, Section 11 I] 10. On sheet A-6 change the design of the recreation building by adding architectural amenities and design features that are shown on the residential building. [Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan, Section 11 I] 11. On sheet A-2 (residential building) specify the type of exterior material for the following materials that are depicted on the elevation view drawings: i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. vii. viii. ix. decorative shutters (windows) decorative shutter (radius - Model 1228) decorative columns decorative brackets unit - entry door 2nd floor gable (front elevation) decorative roof and features above entry door sliding glass door frames storage room door and roof 12. On sheet A-2 specify the color of the following exterior materials by identifying the color name, color designation (letters and/or numbers) and manufacturer of the color: i. ii. ii. iv. v. vi. vii. viii. ix. xi. xii. xiii. xiv. xv. xvi. fiberglass shingles wood fascia decorative shutters (windows) decorative shutter (radius - Model 1228) stucco band around the windows and doors decorative columns decorative bracket rough texture stucco unit - entry door 2nd floor gable (front elevation) decorative roof above entry door sliding glass door frames storage room door and roof decorative stucco detailing smooth texture stucco Note: Submit colored elevation view drawings of one of the residential building, the recreation building, one of the arbors, one of the emergency access gates and project signage. The colored elevation drawings shall identify each exterior material and identify the color by color name, color designation (letters and/or numbers and manufacturer of the color. The colors shown and identified on the colored elevation view drawings shall match the colors specified on the elevation view drawings that are required as part of the set of plans submitted for site plan review. Page 3 Memorandum No. 95-732 1st Review - Tara Oaks NWSP 95-011 13. On sheet A-6 (recreation building) the following exterior materials by name, color designation (letters manufacturer of the color: specify the color of identifying the color and/or numbers) and i. ii. iii. iv. rough texture stucco fiberglass shingles wood fascia hollow metal door frame and door 14. On both sheets identified as A1 (arbor) specify the color of the following exterior materials by identifying the color name, color designation (letters and/or numbers) and manufacturer of the color: i. rough sawn cedar beams and rafters ii. light texture stucco columns Note: Renumber the drawings to eliminate two A1 drawings. 15. Submit for review enlarged scale detail drawings of the trash collector enclosure areas. The drawings shall be dimensioned and include plan, elevation and section view drawings which identify the finish materials and colors. Relocate the gates on the enclosures that the gates encroach into the vehicle use area. 16. Add to the final site development plan the narrowest dimension of the landscape strip required along Knuth Road. Note: All dimensions shall be consistent with code regulations. 17. Specify on the final site development plan the width dimension of the landscape islands located within the vehicle use area. Note: All dimensions shall be consistent with code regulations. 18. On the final site development plan identify the dimensions of the handicapped parking space and required access aisle. Note: All dimensions shall be consistent with code regulations. 19. On the final site development plan dimension the width of all one-way and two-way access aisles. Also dimension the two-way access aisles that is the back-up space for the parking spaces. Note: All dimensions shall be consistent with code regulations. 20. Add to the final site development plan a southbound left turn lane on Knuth Road into the project. 21. Add to the drawings the buffer wall and landscaping required on the north side of the LWDD canal L-25. The wall and landscape material shall be consistent with the pervious approved agreement between the property owner of the subject property and the adjacent property owner's association. 22. On landscape plan sheet 2 of 10 remove the palms shown along the north property line and replace with 2 rows of shade trees twelve (12) to fourteen (14) feet in height at time of planting located on thirty (30) foot centers. The tree location shall be staggered to provide the effect of fifteen (15) feet on center separation. Page 4 Memorandum No. 95-732 1st Review - Tara Oaks NWSP 95-011 23. Modify the plant lists by identifying all of the plant material that is located in the common area in one plant list and all of the plant material that is located on the individual lots in the other plant list. 24. Provide on each landscape plan that shows Knuth Road frontage a typical maximum dimension of 40 foot on center between the trees that are required to meet section 5.D. of the landscape code. 25. Provide the computations showing compliance with the landscape code regulations (Chapter 7.5, Article II - Landscape Code of the city's Land Development Regulations) regarding Sections 5.G. and K. 26. To ensure that the proposed landscaping is in compliance wi th the landscape code regarding size, spacing and species delineate with the symbol on the plant list and the landscape plan the landscape material required to meet Sections 5.D, E, G, I, J and K of the landscape code. Note: One half of the total number of trees, hedges, vines and ground cover required to meet the code shall be a native specie. 27. Provide computations verifying that one-half of the total numbers of landscape material required to meet landscape code sections 5.D, E, G, J, K and L are native. 28. Add to the plant list that identities the common ground landscape material the following text: liThe on center spacing of the trees and hedges/shrubs identified on the plans and/or plant list shall supersede the quantities of trees or hedges/shrubs referenced on the plan or plant list.1I 29. Modify the tree species along the east property line to specify and show no less than one (1) native evergreen large canopy tree spaced eighty (80) feet on center. 30. To comply with the conditions of approval for the project change the size of the red tip coco plum at the area of the east side of the basketball court from twenty-four (24) inches to thirty-six inches in height at planting. Also specify on the site plan that the basketball court will not be illuminated. 31. Specify on the elevation view drawings of the residential units and the recreation building the overall height from finish grade to the top of the ridge. 32. The master plan shall be modified to receive unconditional sign-off by all Technical Review Committee members. Three sets of the rectified master plan documents which show compliance with the conditions of approval for the project are required to be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department. MEH:dim xc: Central File II:Tarasjte.lst BUILDING DIVISION December 19, 1995 MEMORANDUM NO. 95-445 To: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director From: Al Newbold, Deputy Department of Development Director Re: Site Plan Review for Tara Oaks P.D.D. After reviewing the plans for the above referenced project, the Building Division offers the following comments: 1. The distance between buildings should be shown and the walls of the building are required to comply with Table 600 of the Standard Building Code. 2. Signs are required to comply with the Boynton Beach Sign Code, therefore, the sign shown on the Signage Detail Sheet 1 of 1 should be re-calculated to include the area inside the border forming the background for the wall sign, which cannot exceed the maximum allowed per code. ~ ~ " ,. Al Newbo ( AN:mh cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Department of Development Director T ARAOAKS DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. r; .l. I .4 J. )..u..... 1_ A. ....'.f ,~ ,lU_,,&JLJ1[J_i fnl; ,...,1 U,) I ' " " ; 'i "' " , t- t r _ i. ! ~; :' Ili1, \ . ,':' ~ LJ!,; ~ ';' 95-411 TO: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ~m Hukill, P.E., City Engineer December 13, 1995 FROM: DATE: RE: TARA OAKS - SITE PLAN REVIEW We have reviewed subject plan as completely as we could, but since we have not seen a rectified master plan yet we are uncertain whether the following conditions from our August 16 Memo 95-304 are satisfied: A. Verify which roads require naming (for mail delivery) with U.s. Postal Service. (Acknowledged Aug. 31, but not verified) C. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and collector streets. Chap.6, Art.III, Sec.11A, pg.6-3. (Acknowledged but not on site plan) D. If street lighting is provided, establish deed restrictions providing for a property owners association to pay for the operation of the system within the development. Chap.6, Art.III, Sec.14, pg.6-4 and Chap.5, Art.5, Sec.2A4, pg.5-9. (Acknowledged Aug. 31, but not verified) E. Provide certification by Developer's Engineer that drainage plan complies with all City codes and standards. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7 and Chap.23, Art.11F, pg.23-8. (Master plan was certified, but not the drainage plan) F. Minimum 15' pipe must be used in storm sewer. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7. (Acknowledged Aug. 31, but not on plan) G. Inlets must be in grassy areas unless otherwise approved. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.5B, pg.6-8 and Chap.23, Art.11F, pg.23-8. (Acknowledged Aug. 31, but not on plan) J. Need SFWMD & LWDD acceptance prior to Engineering approval. Chap.6, Art.VII, Sec.4B, pg.6-24. (Acknowledged on Aug. 31, but not verified) K. Permits must be obtained for work within R.O.W. Chap.22, Art.II, Sec.7A, pg.22-3. (Acknowledged on Aug. 31, but not verified) L. In lieu of providing sidewalks on both sides of Knuth Rd., install an eight foot concrete bicycle/pedestrian path along east side of road. (Agreed to on Aug.31, but not shown on plan) Dept. of Development, Engineering Div. Memo. No. 95-471 Dept. of Development, Engineering Div. Memo. No. 95-471 Re: Tara Oaks - Site Plan Review December 11, 1995 Page #2 The following additional issues must be resolved: 1. Revise documents to reflect all comments. 2. Show turn lanes. 3. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following; site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and traffic control devices. Permits required from agencies such as the FDOT, PBC, SFWMD and any other permitting agency shall be included with your permit request. 4. Provide a statement that all utilities are available and will be provided by appropriate agencies. Chap. 3, Art.IV, Sec.3R, pg.3-S 5. Minimum pavement width 22' (11' lane for local road). Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.10C, pg.6-11 6. Parking lot section must conform to City code. Chap.6, Art. IV, Sec.10F, pg.6-12 7. Provide details for pavement, grates, pipes, catch basins, etc. Chap.6, Art.V, Sec.4B2e, pg.6-20 8. Designate areas of sodding and seeding. Chap. 7.5, Art.II, Sec.Sc(6), pg.7.5-15 9. Location of proposed curbs is not clearly defined on the drawing. Chap.23, Art.I, Sec.5B15, pg.23-S 10. parking lot dimensions, striping, aisles, stalls, radii, signs, landscaping, etc. must conform with City codes and standards. Chap.23, Art.II, pg.23-6 11. Change Note S (lighting) on "Tara Oaks PUD" sheet from 100 mph to 110 mph. Chap.23, Art.IIA1a. pg.23-6 12. Provide stop signs and stop bars in accordance with the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices". Chap.23, Art.IIB2, pg.23-7 13. Wheel stops or curb required, all stalls. Chap.23, Art.IIE, pg.23-7 14. Provide 27' backup area, all stalls. Chap.23, Art.II,I1, pg.23-9 WVH/ck A:TARAOAKS.MPR ~~-~.,~-_._,.,.~--~~-.~-~----- MEMORANDUM Utilities # 95- 386 ~lli ffi @JU W ffi 1 \U\1 II \ !\lil\ q n .'L:'tC \ 2116 L", i ; lJ } , ; !Id ~ fLf;i:~?~!~,rfm ~~ 7;\r\\j~i.J tl:....: L ,...,.."'~~"_.~-...: TO: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director 7C John A. Guidry, ,A fl~ Director ofUtilitiesft~~~i" -n"'" J10 FROM: Date: December 11, 1995 SUBJECT: Tara Oaks, New Site Plan First Review Staffhas reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: 1. Please provide proposed water and sanitary sewer plans for review and comment, (Sec. 26.16 (a)). 2. City water will not be supplied for irrigation. Please show source and location on the plans, (City Compo Plan, Policy 3C.3.4). 3. No trees are permitted within Utility Easements, (Sec. 7.5-18.1). 4. Palm Beach Health Department permits will be required for proposed water and sanitary sewer systems, (Sec. 26.12). 5. A Capacity Reservation Fee will be required within thirty (30) days of City Commission approval, or upon request for my signature on the HRS/DEP permit applications. The fee amount will be determined based upon meter size or expected demand, (Sec. 26-34 [E]). It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. sm xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella /t.. File tara4 ill ~ (ill.- .R n rV1 r.~ ....m. \.!JJ_bLu l! I, ~ ----...., , (1" . ; A 1/ DEe I 2 /995 .. i Uj RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-573 , "I , PLANNING AIo.JD ~ ZONING DEPT. TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, F oresterlEnvironmentalist j:.( ~ ;+ Tara Oaks RE: DATE: December 11, 1995 The applicant must indicate that the relocation of all gopher tortoises have been completed per the permit. The tree management plan for the preserve area must be submitted prior to the clearing permit. KH:ad RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-568 '.~--TI ~..., Q W IL~.,\. U f ',I', \I DEe'" '8 \995 ' ; ;..i TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director John Wildner. Parks Superintendent 5I;>Y / ~ Tara Oaks .,...~,_.~ PLt~,;:N~~\lG A~~() Z0n',},G Dl.Pf. - FROM: RE: DATE: December 8, 1995 The Recreation and Park Department has reviewed the plans for Tara Oaks. There are no recreation related comments. The plan may continue through the normal review process. JW:ad PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-200 TO: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: New Site Plan Review - Tara Oaks DATE: December 1, 1995 In reference to the above site this project has requested that Public Works provide can pickup at this site. Public Works can provide this service but I feel that this leaves a lot to be desired since it can only lead to a blighted area when bags or cans of garbage are placed in an area as shown. If garbage is scattered by animals or other means the residents will not be concerned if it is a few hundred feet away. If the City boards reviewing this approve the plans I would recommend that each location be an enclosed pad with a drain and running water to keep the area clean. RE/cr fQ1rn@rnowrnrnt lnlL- 4!~: lLUJ PLi'.NNING MID J ZOi~ING CEPl ..............-..----- - TO: FROM: DATE: REF: BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT -", ._,..,..-~""...,,,......_--,\ f""''''II,\: Ilu.~lt [~I~~'~:C~ I ~ I' I III ..JI._U ,1:--, I t _._~""'''''''-',...".......- .. PLANNli'!G p,"m I ,/ ZONiNG DEPT~._...c..~'r.r.!'!-/c ~....;" TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT. MARLON HARRIS 1 DECEMBER 95 TARA OAKS-Ist- SITE PLAN MEMO #0189 I have reviewed the above plans and fi~,9~g(r~o6~;;ji~i~:'t.g!.~Jj,p1e. ",:",;:;::,~:,~;,P gr u l~ ^ ",' ; ..:~:::/;....:::~~~>). ~:*{""'~:::::>:, #R.espectfulJtf":~.~!":'~"":.;:"::':":';'::'~::"'::::~;~,:,,":,:,',~,.~.:::,:.,/ t",~:,~i""",,,,,ji . '.,', /, ~:. . . :: "'~,1,',:,':,'("';"";';";';';'::-' \:"::: :~ ... .:;:;: , ::.;......................:.;..;.. ::.;...;.;'...'.'...'.......:..~..:.. ;:.....;...'.;.'............;..:..... .~ :"""'"'''''''' ,":::, i:,,::, f,::"""'S"""'g""'t",:':,.~,:,'.':,M,"', arlo~,,'~nr,(H"""'''a'''~.'~''~\'':, I t",,.,.,,,,,,,,;;:::!:' ~ ~ ~ . 1""""""""""",:",:",.:1 I",r:::::::::::,:,:':"""" fJ t,ii:::;:.:,;:;::;;::;::::,ii~: fJ t:::::::'::;::::::;:i;;-) :....:..,,:.~..:.~) :~f ~;~....;.:..:.~.,;.::.. ~) ..::.........;.,.;:.. .:....:;; l .:~:::::::;~;:::~!";~' .:~ .:.' .~:; ~:-"~""~';"'" {,/: ::~:::::/""'''~,i~::::J @~ ':;';"~': .:....:.,,' .::.-:.;~ FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-389 TO: Planning Department FROM: Fire Department DATE: November 30, 1995 RE: NWSP 95-011 Tara Oaks We have no further objections. r~ ~ @) n 'Ill ~ ,m1 '1,I.r o,c..:{" 1291) 1lUl II.,.J ,,1,,",<' , "' 1 '; \ .,-,"" -'--'---"'-:'-:":'[11:' j '.' '" ":""'f) V, ; ,~: i' i,<~~':Et:,~ ~"~,~_~, ~~vmih~~ cc: Chief Jordan FPO II Campbell File PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-677 FROM: Carrie Parker, City Manager Clyde IISkip" Milor, Utilities Dept. Chief Field Insp. Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer Sgt. Marlon Harris, Police Department Al Newbold, Building Division William Hukill, Director of Department of Development Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director-~~ TO: DATE: November 29, 1995 RE: SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES 1st Review - New Site Plan Review Project - Tara Oaks Location - East side of Knuth Road approximately 600 feet north of Woolbright Road Agent - Kieran J. Kilday c/o Kilday and Associates, Inc. File No. - NWSP 95-011 Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Site Plan Review approval for this project will be granted by the City Commission. To ensure that the project stays on line with the review time frame, I request that the plans and exhibits be reviewed and formal written comments transmitted to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department no later than 5:00 P.M. on December 11. 1995. Do not return plans and exhibits. Retain same for the review of the amended plans (second review) . Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval: 1. Use the review standards specified in Part III, Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Section 8 of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments. 2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete based on the submittal requirements identified in Section 7 of the Site plan Review Ordinance. However, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the reviewer through the Planning and Zoning Department. 3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the documents. 4. Technical Review Committee member{s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with other departmental improvements. Page Tara To: Re: 2 of 2 Oaks TRC Members Planning & Zoning Memo 95-677 5. When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review specified. 6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memo, within the time frame stated above, to the Planning and Zoning Director stating that the plans are approved and they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and recommend the project be forwarded through the approval process. All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department for distribution to the applicant. please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memo. Michael E. Haag will be the Planning and Zoning Department staff member coordinating the 1st review of the project. The Planning and Zoning Department will send the applicant a cover letter which includes the comment(s) and directions to amend the plans to comply with the comments and the procedures for resubmission. When the Planning and Zoning Department receives the amended plans, they will distribute the plans with a cover memo to all TRC Members for review and approval. TJH:bme Attachment xc: (Memo Only) Floyd Jordan, Fire Chief Charlie Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director Thomas Dettman, Police Chief John Guidry, Utilities Director Central File A:lstREV,tar/TRC