AGENDA DOCUMENTS
~~~
~t.t{
),tt
~ ~ \~~I,
~~,.v
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-727
Agenda Memorandum for
December 19, 1995 City Commission Meeting
TO:
Carrie Parker
City Manager
Tambri J. HeYden~
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
DATE:
December 15, 1995
SUBJECT:
Tara Oaks - MPMD # 95-007
Master Plan Modification - access, recreation, unit type
and use acreage
At the advice of the city attorney, please place the above-
referenced request back on the City Commission agenda (for December
19, 1995) under Development Plans.
INTRODUCTION: You will recall that on November 7, 1995, the
Commission, with a 3-2 vote, made a determination of substantial
change for the above request (detailed further in the attached
Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-654). You will
also recall that the Commission made several recommendations to
guide the Planning and Development Board in the action the Board
would take subsequent to the Commission's November 7, 1995 action.
To this end the Planning and Development Board, on December 12,
1995 voted, 7-0, to approve this request, subject to the attached
staff comments in Exhibit C. These staff comments are not the
staff comments that were forwarded to Commission on November 7th,
because submittal of a revised master plan to reflect Commission
recommendations, and an additional review by the Technical Review
Committee, necessitated refinement of the original staff comments.
RECOMMENDATION: The city attorney advises that since the
Commission's action of making all Planning and Development board
decisions advisory, this request must go back to the Commission for
final disposition. The city attorney states that this is
especially necessary since he believes the Board's action regarding
the construction of Knuth Road is contrary to the Commission's
statements at the November 7, 1995 meeting. Therefore, below is a
list of all the comments in Exhibit C to which the applicant
objected at the December 12, 1995 Planning and Development Board
meeting. These comments have been revised to reflect the agreement
between the applicant and the Board. (Wording has been taken from
the city clerk's minutes of the Board meeting.)
Comment 4 (revised) - Place the following note on the master
plan: "Completion of Knuth Road fronting the PUD must be
___ completed prior to the first certificate of occupancy. The
balance of Knuth Road, northerly to its current terminus to
the north, must be completed prior to the issuance of the last
certificate of occupancy or within two years, whichever occurs
first. II
It is believed that the Commission desired all of Knuth Road (from
Woolbright Road to the existing Knuth Road terminus) to be
completed prior to the first residential certificate of occupancy,
not postponed to two years after plat approval. Also, this
revision allows phasing, but does not address bonding.
Comment 13 (revised) - Submit a tree survey with the tree
management plan for the entire site, excluding the church
parcel.
~
,.
Attached Recreation and Park Memorandum #95-578 affirms that this
revision is acceptable. However, in comment 1 of this new
memorandum, the Forester modifies comment 12 to read as follows
(the Planning and Development Board did not have the benefit of
this new memorandum) :
Comment 12 (revised) - Submit a copy of the Gopher tortoise
relocation permit from Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish
Commission as it is assumed that all Gopher tortoises on site
shall be relocated. If all cannot be relocated, a master plan
modification shall be filed.
Comment 18 (revised) - Modify the submittal to include a
survey of the entire PUD and renumber all sheets
chronologically. The survey may be older than six months, but
not older than the survey processed for the 1990 rezoning.
This revision is acceptable to staff.
Comment 24 - deleted by the Planning and Development Board.
This deletion is acceptable to staff.
Comment 31 (revised) - A separate site plan review shall be
required for the block wall and landscape screening required
adjacent to the project and located north of the L.W.D.D. L-25
Canal. This shall not hold up unconditional sign-off approval
of a rectified master plan.
This revision is acceptable to staff.
Comment 32 (revised) - Due to the close proximity of the
basketball court to the on-site and adjacent residential
units, it is recommended that a note be placed on the master
plan indicating that the basketball court will not be
illuminated. To lessen the adverse impact of the use of the
basketball court to the adj acent residences, it is also
recommended that 36" high (at time of planting) evergreen
shrub material, spaced five (5) feet on-center be installed
along the east property line to a distance of 20 feet north
and south of the length of the basketball court.
This revision is acceptable to staff.
Therefore, it is recommended that the Commission approve this
request, subject to the staff comments in Exhibit C, except for
comment 24, together with the revisions to comment 13, 12, 18, 31
and 32 as written above and subject to either endorsement of
comment 4 above or further revision to it as the Commission deems
necessary.
TJH:dim
Attachment
a:CCAgnda3.Tar
-----
-~
-=:--:::-- --
I . : ,71 P- il r.rJ R 00
n I ~:~ . I ~ : I \I) 15
. u--- I
RECREATION" PARK MEMORANDUM tl95-S78lli I G co I 319S5 ~ i
PLANNING A'lD I .lJU' ,
ZONING DEPT. . vnV'-
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Kevin J. Hallahan, ForesterlEnvironmenta1ist fJ 1f
Tara Oaks - Master Plan
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
December 13, 1995
The applicant should place the following comments on the plans landscape sheets:
I. All gopher tortoises which are on the site shall be relocated off site (by permit). Otherwise
the applicant shall come into the City of Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Department for
a master plan modification.
2. The tree survey and tree management plan is submitted for Phase I only as identified on the
master plan and the same requirement will be completed in the future for Phase II (church
parcel).
KH:ad
xc: Mike Haag, Zoning/Site Administrator
E X H I BIT
II C II
EXHIBIT "C"
Administrative Conditions
Project name: TARA OAKS PUD
File number: MPMD 95-007
Reference: 2 sheets prepared bv Kildav and Associates identified
as 3rd submittal with Plannino and Zonino Department November 14.
1995 date stamp markino
DEPARTMENTS !NCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments: ,
1. The applicant at the above site has
requested can pickup for solid waste
disposal and recycling which could
possibly be accommodated, however the
location and accessibility for
servicing must be shown at time of
site plan submittal.
UTILITIES
Comments:
2. Plan shall show existing utilities on
or adjacent to the tract, and the
proposed points of connection to the
existing water and sewer mains, (LDR
Chapter 3, Art. IV, Sec.3(O).
3 . Utility easements between or adjacent
to buildings shall be a minimum of
twenty feet (20') or twice the depth
which ever is greater and the utility
pipe shall be a minimum of ten feet
(10') from all structures, [Sec.26.
33 (b) ] .
I FIRE I I
Comments: NONE
I POLICE I I
Comments: NONE
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
4. Completion of Knuth Road must be
accomplished prior to issuance of
first Certificate of Occupancy for any
dwelling unit.
5. Turn lanes (Northbound right turn in
and Southbound left turn in) at Tara
Oaks entry road must be shown as part
of paving documents.
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
6. Site should be platted.
7 . Plans should be in compliance with
parking signs and handicap code.
1 of 6
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
8. Plans should show established
easements and setbacks as it relates
to townhouses.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
9 . One-half credit for private recreation
provided is recommended based on the
following elements:
i. Swimming pool and deck
ii. Game court area
a. Basketball
b. Sand volleyball
iii. Meeting room
iv. Jogging trail
v. Gazebo or garden amenity
10. Recreation dedication requirement:
192 multifamily units X .015 acres =
2.88 acres
2.88 acres divided by 2 = 1.44 acres
recreation dedication requirement.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments:
11. Submit an environmental assessment.
12. Submit a copy of Gopher tortoises
relocation - permit from Florida Game
and Fresh Water Fish Commission.
13. Submit a tree survey with Tree
Management Plan for entire site.
14. Sheet #2 of recent submittal shows the
1.7 acre "reservation" area. This
area should delineate how the existing
trees (and associated native
vegetation) will be preserved. This
area should be part of comment #13
above.
15. The sheet #2 of recent submittal shows
another tree preservation area as part
of the church parcel. This area
should be addressed in similar fashion
to comment #13 and 14 above.
16. The sheet #2 note about exotic species
of trees indicates that all other
trees will be removed with the exotic
species. The native trees not in the
preservation area(s) that can be
successfully relocated, will be part
of the Tree Management Plan relocation
efforts.
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
2 of 6
~ ...
I DEPARTMENTS
17. To ensure that the area within Pod 2
open space is not encroached by a
building or structure, with the
exception of the gazebo, identify on
the master plan a building setback
line following the perimeter of Pod 2.
This building setback line will
terminate at the established building
setback line along the east and west
sides of the PUD on both sides of the
existing parcel line. To further
clarify the locatio~ and setbacks for
the gazebo specify on the master plan
a 20 foot setback from the south
parcel line, 40 foot setback from the
west property line and identify the
maximum north/south and east/west
dimension of the structure.
18. Modify the submittal to include a
survey of the entire PUD and renumber
all sheets chronologically.
19. Considering that the City Commission
determined that the required parking
spaces for the townhouse units may be
located in a parking lot rather than
the required two (2) spaces being
provided on each townhouse loti the
project is required to comply with the
"Particular Requirements" specified in
Article II - Landscape Code, Chapter
7.5 of the City's Land Development
Regulations. Place a note on the
landscape plan indicating that the
project is subject to compliance with
Article II - Landscape Code, Chapter
7.5 of the City's Land Development
Regulations.
20. Submit previous sheet 4 of 4 (buffer
wall and landscaping required north of
L.W.D.D. Canal L-25) and renumber all
sheets chronologically.
21. Modify the parking data for the
recreation amenities to identify the
correct number of required parking
spaces consistent with the Section 11.
16. e. (1), (4) and (12) (d) and (e)
of Chapter 2 - Zoning.
22. Recalculate the size and area of the
basketball court. Correct the data
including the number of required
parking spaces.
23. Show on the master plan the location
of the established setbacks specified
on the plan for the east and west
sides of Pod 3.
3 of 6
I INCLUDE I REJECT I
L..
DEPARTMENTS
24. To show consistency in identifying the
east and west setbacks for the
recreation amenities change the
setback note identified on the west
side of the recreation area from 25
feet to 31 feet. Thirty-one (31) feet
will match the setback specified on
the plan for the east side of the
recreation area. To clarify the
setbacks for the recreation amenities
place a note on the master plan
indicating that the,31 foot east/west
setback is for all recreation
amenities except for buildings which
shall follow the perimeter setbacks.
25. To be consistent with the data
indicated in the analysis of the
traffic report prepared by Palm Beach
County Traffic Division specify on the
master plan 20,000 square feet for the
area of the church located in Pod 3.
26. Modify the Knuth Road right-of-way to
show compliance with the traffic
analysis made by Palm Beach County
Traffic Division and the City Engineer
as follows:
i. Southbound left turn lane on
Knuth Road into the project;
ii. Southbound left turn lane on
Knuth Road at the intersection of
Knuth Road and Woolbright Road;
and
iii. Northbound right turn lane on
Knuth Road into the project.
27. Since platting does not require any
review by the Planning and Development
Board, and the City Commission review
does not occur until the end, no
opportunity is available for the
Commission to set land value for the
purpose of calculating the recreation
fee. Therefore, since this request
involves additional fees to be paid
and since the property is under
contract to purchase, it is
recommended the land value be set
using the purchase price at the time
of the most recent sale of the PUD
property. This will require the
applicant to submit a copy of their
purchase contract concurrent with plat
submittal.
28. Revised unified control documents
shall be submitted to reflect the
change from rental apartments to fee
simple townhouse units.
4 of 6
INCLUDE
I' .'
Ii-
REJECT
I DEPARTMENTS
29. Submission of a rectified master plan
showing compliance with the conditions
of approval for the project will be
required to be submitted to the
Planning and Zoning Department in
triplicate prior to platting and/or
site plan review of the project.
30. Payment of fees for third review is
required at time of submittal of
rectifiea master plan.
31. Please note: a separate site plan
review will be required for the block
wall and landscape screening required
adjacent to the project and located
north of L.W.D.D. Canal L-25.
32. Do to the close proximity of the
basketball court to the on-site and
off-site residential units, it is
recommended that a note be placed on
the master plan indicating that the
basketball court will not be
illuminated. To lessen the adverse
impact of the use of the basketball
court to the off-site residential
units it is also recommended that nine
(9) gallon evergreen shrub material,
spaced five (5) feet on-center be
installed along the east property line
to a distance of 20 feet north and
south of the length of the basketball
court.
33. To show compliance with the vehicle
use area screening requirements of the
landscape code and provide a
vegetative perimeter buffer the
following landscape improvements are
recommended for the east and west
sides of the residential project
(note: the landscaping required along
the north property line of the project
is subject to the Tara Oaks PUD
property owner and adjacent property
owner's association agreement. The
plans shall describe and show the
landscape buffer consistent with the
specifications identified in the
agreement) :
i. omit the landscape buffer
easement along the north, east
and west perimeter of the
residential project - (the
landscape code will require
landscape material to be
installed throughout the pervious
common ground open space area,
therefore, the perimeter
landscape buffer easements are
not needed) .
5 of 6
INCLUDE
.~L
l"..\v
~' ....
REJECT
DEPARTMENTS
change the proposed perimeter
buffer landscaping by omitting
the grouping of three (3) small
canopy trees and two (2) large
canopy trees every fifty foot on
center and replace by showing and
describing a grouping (3 or 4) of
small native and moderate drought
tolerant trees (minimum height
eight (8) feet) spaced forty (40)
feet on center and in every other
grouping remov~ a small tree and
replace with a large canopy
native (evergreen) tree (minimum
height 8 feet). The recommended
trees shall be installed within
the pervious common ground open
space area located along the east
and west perimeter of the
residential project. The
proposed continuous native or
drought tolerant hedge (minimum
height 18 inches) spaced two (2)
feet on-center located along the
east and west perimeter is.
acceptable. However, the
continuous hedge shall be .
extended along south edge of the
recreation facility. Please note
that a minimum of one/half of the
total number of trees and hedges
required to meet the landscape
code specifications shall be a
native specie. Place a note on
the landscape plan indicating the
50% native specie requirement for
required trees and hedges.
iii. Return to the landscape plan the
landscaping and landscape buffers
that were shown on the previous
approved master plan in the area
south of the existing parcel
line that separates the
residential property from the
church property.
ii.
MER/dim
a:ComDepts.TAR/p&d
6 of 6
INCLUDE
......,'
REJECT
:.~
8.A.l
TARA OAKS PUD
~in tI-~
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-654
TO: chairman and Members
Planning and Development board
FROM: Tambr:.. J. Heyden 1f14
Planning and Zoning Director
DATE: Novembel.- 9, 1995
SUBJECT: Tara Oaks PUD - MPMD ~95-007
Master plan modification - access, recreation, unit type
and use acreage
INTRODUCTION
Kilday and Associates, agent for pulte Home Corporation - contract
purchaser of property owned by Bill Winchester, is requesting to
modify the previously approved (time extension also granted) master
plan for the Tara Oaks PUD, as described in the attached reports
(Plannlng and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-541 and 95-597).
Tara Oaks is to be located at the northeast corner of Knuth Road
extended and Woolbright Road.
After s-:aff review, requests for master plan modifications
forwarded to the city Commission, prior to forwarding to
Planning and DevE~lopment Board, for a determination that
changes requested are either substantial in nature or
substantial i~ nature. This request went before the
Commission on November 7, 1995.
are
the
the
not
City
RECOMMENDATION
At the November 7, 1995 meeting the Commission, with a 3 - 2 vote,
made a determination that the changes requested were not
substantial in nature and could be forwarded to the Planning and
Development Board for final disposition. Desplte the premise on
which the April 1995 master plan time extension was granted, the
extension of S. W. Congress Boulevard was decided to have been
resolved in 1990 as not being required and to terminate in a cul-
de-sac constructed to clty standards. Further, with their
determination, the Conmission is recommending the following to the
Planning and Development Board:
1
-'- .
All buildings shall be moved out of the former, S.W. Congress
Boulevard right-of-way (in order for there to be room to do
this without losing units some of the recreation amenities
planned fer Pod 1 will have to be relocated to open space Pod
2 and will require a revised master plan);
2. A ~abana shall be replaced with an 800 square foot meeting
room building having bathroom facilities to be eligible for
half credit resulting in payment of the value of 1.44 acres of
land;
'"\
.:J.
To compensate for the "weak" recreation amenities,
recreation amenity (a half court basketball court)
provided;
a sixth
shall be
4. Required parking spaces for each unit shall not be required to
be provided on the townhouse lot;
5. All turn lanes referenced in Planning and Zoning Department
Memorandum No. 95-597 shall be constructed;
6. A "Knox Eox" shall be acceptable for police and fire access to
the project;
TO: Planning and Development Board
_'?-
'-
November 9, 1995
7.
Revised unified control
reflect the change from
townhouses;
documents shall be
rental apartments
submi tted to
to fee simple
8. Knuth Road shall be constructed in its entirety simultaneously
with construction of the townhouse units and prior to the last
certificate of occupancy being issued.
In addition to the above, the PI anning and Zoning Department
recommends that the Board approve this request, subj ect to all
staff comments which are not in conflict with the above (Public
Works Department Memorandum No. 95-165, Engineering Division
Memorandum No. 95-304, Building Division Memorandum No. 95-299 -
except comment 2 regarding parking, Fire Department Memorandum No.
95-346 WDC and Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-555
- except comments 8 and 10).
tjh
A:TOaksPD
xc: Central File
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-597
Agenda Memorandum for
October 17, 1995 city Commission Meeting
FROM:
Carrie Parker
city Manager
Tambri J. Heyden .~
Planning and Zoning Director
TO:
DATE:
october 13, 1995
SUBJECT:
Tara Oaks PUD - MPMD #95-007
(Change in access, recreation, unit type and use
acreage)
Please be advised that the above-referenced item is on the table
for the october 17, 1995 Commission meeting agenda.
DESCRIPTION: A detailed description of this request is presented
in planning and zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-541. You
will recall that at the last Commission meeting the applicant
requested that the Commission table this item to the October 17th
meeting. You will further recall that the reason for the request
to table was to allow time for the applicant to substantiate his
claim that the description of his request in the above-referenced
report, specifically to omit the extension of S.W. Congress
Boulevard to Knuth Road, was in error based on his belief that
the omission of this road was approved with the 1990 rezoning/
master plan for Tara Oaks.
Today the applicant plans to further research this issue by
viewing the files of the Planning and Zoning, Engineering and
utilities Departments, since to date there has been nothing found
which supports, with total certainty, the applicant's claim.
Attached is a reduction of the master plan, showing a cul-de-sac
terminating S.W. Congress Boulevard rather than extension of the
road, which the applicant believes was approved in 1990 and
granted a time extension in April of this year. However, if
this is the master plan that was granted an extension, it
conflicts with the master plan staff presented to the Commission
in the backup for the time extension and conflicts with the
statements made by the applicant's traffic engineer in the
traffic report that was submitted with the time extension. If
staff's assumptions were incorrect (staff had no reason to
believe that they were incorrect after researching minutes and
files), it would have been appropriate and important to have
raised the issue at the time of the extension (the approval of
which spanned the course of five months between submittal of
extension and Commission approval). As evidenced by the current
staff recommendation against this road omission, had this issue
been raised with the extension, staff's recommendation would have
reflected the same concerns currently expressed.
At best, the June 19, 1990 Commission minutes of the master plan
approval (ordinances approved later) state that when the
applicant presented a new master plan to the Commission that
staff had never looked at and which showed no S.W. Congress
Boulevard connection, Planning Department staff indicated that if
this road was not extended the right-of-way should be dedicated
for future road construction by the City if the need arose. The
proposed master plan does not reflect this either. In fact, the
current proposal shows 14 dwelling units and 23 parking spaces
within this right-of-way for the future road construction. This
leads to the argument that the 192 units previously approved
cannot be accommodated as townhouses within the acreage that was
previously designated for residential use, even with the very
small lot size proposed.
TO: Carrie Parker
-2-
October 13, 1995
Lastly, clarification is needed regarding staff's recommendation
for construction of turn lanes for this project. Based on the
attached Engineering Division Memorandum No. 95-379, received
after transmittal of the Planning and Zoning Department's staff
report, the following turn lanes are recommended:
1. southbound left turn lane on Knuth Road into the
project;
2. southbound left turn lane on Knuth Road at the
intersection of Knuth Road and Woolbright Road; and
3. Northbound right turn lane on Knuth Road into the
project.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff's recommendation remains unchanged,
subject to further conditioning any approval of the project with
construction of the above-listed turn lanes.
tjh
Attachments
xc: central file
A:TaraOMPM
~
!~
w
.
.-
.,
I
.
q
j H~ if
. inl':
er I,ll
: . .
I I
"''''''... '".."
,.
I! I!
H ~ i(lfJfl
II If .f!l
I 1.
Ifif !
!Ii J !: ~
I: f I
'i
.
nfli I jflllljil!m;l/m:i j
.. lI'ifl' 1 ,.: ,i. I
..
. .1' : 1'li'lfl!lli'ilil':1
"Ii J .~; IIII;!: i~l.
J:fh I "'Idl ",f!'.,.;" IS
; :lil:JmJ,';,IJ;!li II
If:! i':.JIJill !., "'"
I ,II, '11. ,. I
ni,'; I.: !I, . h.
" IJ..hU!.f.i, lu"
i J II II I.. , "n'l' II
i a ;~~ . ,iliiii'i!i:I.I!~ Hi ',I:! !lllll./1
I :-: i fl I 111,1 ~fl Ii' I fl, II '.11'1 t S
ill II . ! il' ,ai; III I" .,. ,ll'" 'I
I 111ij ill' Iii i I lid lilli, I ~
f : III I! jl hf! I!l /fl!l! !.
I I I I:. I r r .'1 i'"" I
. 'I i I I II ,11'1
i.: Ii- II ,f Iji11iJ
· ., I I I I ,I '1'11
.: ~ IJ I i (! lilu
!l. )> ,I '! 'I'
f ~ ! !I JUtl
a ~
! en
CD
· "0
J c:
:!I C
a
f
;= IE: c E i i; i ,.
" ; IIIIIII !~11I
i ~ I II I I I .
j i I i! , ~ i I a ;I , I I
I "mr'Ulfl!'I', i, 'm, m,J r
I ill 1 r. I.
I I ' ! .
. I '"~
I III" I . . f
",I II'.
I. III' "Ii) II II ~
I(!i:' "II I ~
l;n' I , I I Ii: :
I cu' , . · I i I I:
'Ii.'.
--
:f
If
=i
'i
.~
fI
i
~
'l
.:
't
at
I.
i 1.1
:.
-~...
..~..-
:.::1
:i:~ I
!r:; :
=J-I
-. ~=
::~
...
...
.
...
..
--:::;
5::; !
- · l
::::.... 5
.. -..
':'11:
:::..
... ..=
:."..
.. .:
....
.....
.
.....
....
.
.-
.. ..
..
.
ili'l
""'c...
-.- ..
:.... I
....... I!
.:,1: ~ z
....;- ..
::.: II
3:.
. .~
~:j
we_
...-..
a::
... ..
. -.
.. ...
...
. -
. ..
!'
;f;;!"~
0... .,
..... ... ~
- ....
:::.1 "
~i: = M1
:....
=1 ~. .
:r:: I
".i
"'c..
.....
... ..
.. .
. .
...
:.
..
.
..
--:1 S
:.: -.. ,.
""0:: .
== ::
~.! ~
:::.:
.".-
.~r!
......
..c.
.
:::
.
..
.. .
~:::;:i I
.. -I"
i!!.I
II If'
"'.. .i
:: 5 · :.
~I~i
i J
~.-
..
. .. ".of. .:' '."
. ,.~.
;.:J.. ,;/11 ~
~ff..~
~. ... --~:p'-
..-
~
#"/"--
p--
. i
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-379
~
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
~~am HUkill, P.E.
~~-Engineer
FROM:
DATE:
September 29, 1995
RE:
TARA OAKS - DECELERATION LARES
We have reviewed the Weisberg September 22 letter and find his
logic reasonable, particularly with regard to the southbound left
turn lane into Tara Oaks from Knuth Road. A right turn
(northbound) lane into Tara Oaks from Knuth Road also is desirable.
Neither has much value until the "link" is constructed, but both
will be desirable at that time.
WVH:ck
"
C:TARAOAKS.LN
~
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-541
Agenda Memorandum for
October 2, 1995 city Commission Meeting
THRO:
Carrie Parker
Ci ty Manager .~ I~
Tambri J. HeYd~~~R
Planning and Zoning Director
TO:
FROM:
Michael E. Haag
zoning and Site Administrator
DATE:
September 26, 1995
SUBJECT: Tara Oaks PUD MPMD 95-007 (change in access,
recreation, unit type and use acreage)
NATURE OF REOUEST
Kilday and Associates, agent for pulte Home Corporation, contract
purchaser of property owned by Bill Winchester is requesting to
modify the Tara Oaks PUD master plan. The 20.16 acre project
previously planned for 192 multi-family apartment units, 20,000
square foot (650 seat) church and open space area is zoned PUD and
located at the northeast corner of Woolbright Road and Knuth Road
extended (see Exhibit "A" - location map). The requested changes
are limited to the north 14.470 acres of the PUD and are as
follows: (see Exhibit "B" - letter of request and proposed master
pl an) :
1. omit the extension of S.W. Congress Boulevard to Knuth
Road.
2. Reduce the number of access pOints into the project from
two (2) to one (1).
3. Increase in the size of Pod 1 (residential tract) by
incorporating, .6 acres resulting from the elimination of
S. w. Congres~ Boulevard right-of-way. A new property
line which subdivides Pod 2 (open space) therefore
creating a project that consists of 5.69 acres for church
with open space and 14.7 acres townhouse project with
open space.
4. Change the type of units from 192 mUlti-family apartment.
to 23, two-story buildings with. tot.l of 192 townhouse
units. Establish the following building and site
regulations for the townhouse units:
.
Building setbacks (individual lots); front 10 feet,
rear 15 feet, side (end unit) 3 feet, side
(interior unit) 0 feet. Note minimum bUilding
separation is 15 feet.
Pool setbacks; pools not allowed.
...
Screen enclosure setbacks; shall comply with
building setbacks.
Minimum living ar.. - 750 aquare f.et (propos.d
unit sizes - 913 square feet, 1,079 square feet and
1,082 square feet)
BUilding height - Remains as originally approved
(30 feet, two stories)
Page 2
Agenda Memorandum for
october 2, 1995 city Commission Meeting
Tara Oaks PUD
MPMD 95-007
Lot area - 1,260 square feet (end unit) and 1,050
square feet (interior unit)
Perimeter setbacks: Increase the north setback from
20 feet to 40 feet. Please note the following
setbacks remain as previously approved; 40 foot
front (west Knuth Road), 40 foot rear (east) and 20
foot side (south). Also note the perimeter
setbacks take precedence over building setbacks for
individual lots.
5. Change the type and location of private recreation
amenities from a clubhouse, pool, jogging trail, picnic
area and fishing dock to pool, cabana ( res trooms for
pool), sand volley ball court, jogging trail and gazebo
or garden amenity. The current and proposed location of
the recreation amenities are shown on Exhibit "e" and
Exhibit "B" respectively.
6. Establish a 25 foot wide landscape buffer along the north
property, 15 foot wide buffer along the east property
line and 10 foot wide buffer along the west (Knuth Road)
property line of the project. Pod 2 an open space and
detention area border the south property of the
residential tract.
BACKGROUND
On June 21, 1988, the city Commission approved a master plan and
rezoning of the Tara Oaks PUD property from RIAAA (single-family
residential) to PUD with a land use intensity (LUI) of 4.00 for 78
single-family, detached units.
On December 18, 1990, after review by the Department of Community
of Affairs (DCA) and with objections, the City Commission approved
ordinances for a land use element amendment that changed the land
use classification of the property from Low Density Residential to
Medium Density Residenttal and rezoning of the property from PUD
(LUI:4) to PUD (LUI:5) with a master plan for 192 multi-family
uni ts, private recreation and a 20,000 square foot church (see
Exhibit "C" - current master plan). The adopted comprehensive plan
amendment was transmitted to DCA on December 19, 1990, alollg with
responses to DCA's objections. In February 1991, the DCA issued a
notice of intent to find the comprehensive plan amendment in
compliance.
The 1990 applications were submitted under Palm Beach County's
current traffic performance standa~ds ordinance, however prior to
the effective date of the City'S concurrency management ordinance.
Therefore, concurrency certification for traffic and concurrency
exemption for drainage and neighborhood parks were granted with the
1990 approval.
On June 2, 1992, the City Commission approved a request to allow
construction of the south portion (adjacent to the church parcel)
of Knuth Road, prior to preliminary plat approval of the property.
The reason for submitting the request was to ensure the Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints' purchase of the church parcel
within the PUD, which took place on June 26, 1992.
On June 16, 1992, the City Commission granted a one (1) year time
extension that extended the project's June 18, 1992 expiration date
to June 17, 1993. No application for extensions was made since the
June 1993 expiration, until a retroactive extension which was filed
Page 3
Agenda Memorandum for
October 2, 1995 city Commission Meeting
Tara Oaks PUD
MPMD 95-007
in November 1994; a period of one year and five months.
On April 8 1993 the City Commission approved a master plan
modificatio~ for 'the Tara Oaks PUD to amend the condition of
approval which required the construction of Knuth Road to be tied
entirely to the Tara Oaks PUD. The approval of the master plan
modification allowed the construction responsibility for Knuth Road
to be shared by the Knuth Road PCD.
On April 18, 1995 the city Commission approved the retroactive
extension submitted November 1994. The approval granted
months to file a plat application. The approval was
conditioned upon the applicant evaluating reducing density at
of the applicant's next submittal (subject request).
time
nine
also
time
Chapter 2.5, Planned Unit Developments, of
development regulations states that changes
developments shall be processed as follows:
the City's land
in planned unit
Section 12. Changes in plans.
"Changes in plans approved as a part of the zoning to PUD may
be permitted by the planning and Zoning Board upon application
filed by the developer or his successors in interest, prior to
the expiration of the PUD classification, but only [after] a
finding that any such change or changes are in accord with all
regulations in effect when the change or changes are requested
and the intent and purpose of the comprehensive plan in effect
at the time of the proposed change. Substantial changes shall
be proposed as for a new application of PUD zoning. The
determination of what constitutes a substantial change shall
be within the sole discretion of the City Commission. Non-
substantial changes as determined by the City Commission in
plans shall not extend the expiration of the eighteen month
approval for the PUD classification."
~
ANALYSIS
,
staff has reviewed this request for consistency with the PUD
development standards, and the intent and purpose of planned unit
developments as stated in the following sections of Chapter 2.5 of
the City's land development regulations:
Section 1. Intent and purpose.
"A Planned Unit Development District (PUD) is established. It
is intended that this district be utilized to promote
efficient and economical lqnd use, improved amenities,
appropriate and harmonious variety in physical development,
creative design, improved living environment, orderly and
economical development in the City, and the protection of
adj acent and existing ana future ct ty aavelopment. The
di.trict i. suitable for development, redevelopment and
conservation of land, water and other resources of the City.
... Regulations for Planned Unit Developments are intended to
accomplish the purposes of zoning, subdivision regulations and
other applicable City regulations to the same degree that they
are intended to control development on a lot-by-lot basis. In
view of the substantial public advantages of planned unit
development, it is the intent of PUD regulations to promote
and encourage development in this form where tracts suitable
in size, location and character for the uses and structures
proposed are to be planned and developed as unified and
Page 4
Agenda Memorandum for
october 2, 1995 City Commission Meeting
Tara Oaks PUD
MPMD 95-007
coordinated units.
B.
Section 9. Internal PUD standards.
INTERNAL LOTS AND FRONTAGE. Within the boundaries of the
PUD, no minimum lot size or minimum yards shall be
required; provided, however, that PUD frontage on
dedicated public roads shall observe front yard
requirements in accordance with the zoning district the
PUD use most closely resembles and that peripheral yards
abutting other zoning districts shall be the same as
required in the abutting zone."
The following evaluates the significant issue relating to the
proposed changes:
1. omission of the S.W. congress Boulevard connection to Knuth
Road extended - This change will cause a redistribution of
traffic from the original approved road network. The Police
Department Memorandum No. 0168 indicates that the response
time for emergency vehicles to the subject property as well as
the Clipper Cove and Lakes of Tara development would be
greatly increased if the road connection was constructed.
The Lakes of Tara Homeowners Association has indicated that
they are not in favor of extending S. W. Congress Boulevard to
Knuth Road extended (see Exhibit "D" - letter dated August 29,
1995 from Lakes of Tara Homeowners Association). The
association has also requested some minor improvements to this
area that are normally paid by an applicant as part of
abandonment.
From evaluating the plan, it appears that the change in unit
type from apartments to townhouses and the desire to retain
the 192 units from the approved master plan, as well as offer
a privatized community, has driven the elimination of the S.W.
Congress Boulevarq extension. The reason for this is that
because of stacking and clustering of units, apartments
(previous master plan) more efficiently use land; yielding a
higher number of units per acre. Uni t types (such as
townhouses) that only cluster units and not stack, require
more land area to yield the same amount of density, even when
both unit types are limited to two stories.
The argument often made of not wanting to extend an existing
road to a new project because of traffic and divi.:l.on of
residential tracts :l.a not applicable to this project since
even with the previous maste~ plan the project's residential
area was consolidated to one side (north) of S.W. Congress
Boulevard. Furthermore, the only traffic that will use S.W.
Congress Boulevard is the traffic generated by this project;
reason being the existence of Quail Ridge to the west and
therefore, the lack of further extension of s. W. Congress
Boulevard west of Knuth Road.
.. This issue of connectivity of roads to the eXisting road
network has been raised frequently over the past five years
due to increased popularity of privatized communities which
stems from increased crime or the perception of increased
crime. Rarely do applicants and homeowners understand that
with privatization, quality of public .ervices (response to
fire, pOlice, utility emergencies and evacuations) decreases,
not only to their development, but to surrounding existing and
future developments that benefit from the safety and
Page 5
Agenda Memorandum for
october 2, 1995 city Commission Meeting
Tara Oaks PUD
MPMD 95-007
convenience of an improved, integrated road network within
their city or county.
In their memorandum the police Department notes the benefit to
multiple communities when roads are extended. The pre-planned
extension of the existing dead-end of S.W. Congress Boulevard
was to provide quicker response by police units in the western
area of the city to the houses in the western areas of Lakes
of Tara which at this time only have access from Congress
Avenue. This gives the Police Department the option of
sending a police unit from the east or west, or both if
needed, to best handle an emergency in either the Lakes of
Tara or Tara Oaks developments.
2. Reduction of the number of access points into the project from
two (2) to one (1) - Implementing this change would result in
the need for emergency access point (s) . As indicated in
Police Department Memorandum No. 0168, they have provided
emergency access points along Knuth Road, however, the "Knox
Box" type of entry is not acceptable to the Police Department.
It should be noted that access points restricted to emergency
vehicles, rather than providing a full access are less than
desirable and can reduce quality of emergency service too.
With the increased popularity of privatized communities the
fewer the access points, the lesser the cost to the developer
and homeowners to secure their access points with guardhouses,
or the less expensive method of automatic gates. Both Police
and Fire have been accepting these alternative types of
access, provided the type of gate opening mechanism is agreed
upon, realizing that over time, the availability of these
emergency access points can be forgotten about and never used.
3.' Increase in the size of Pod 1 (residential tract) by
incorporating the .6 acres of the proposed elimination of S.W.
Congress Boulevard and the subdivision of Pod 2 - These
proposed changes are acceptable with the condition that the
subdivision of Pod, 2 does not decrease the total area of Pod
2 below the origiItally approved 3.5 acres and that on the
master plan the acreage breakdown for each parcel/property be
delineated. As was noted previously in issue 1 above, this
increase in Pod 1 size is driven by the omission of the road
extension and the desire to retain the full 192 units.
4. Change the type of units from 192 multi-family apartments to
23, two-story buildings with a total of 192 townhouse units -
All building and site regulations are acceptable with the
exception of the location of the parking spaces and the size
of the lots. The lots shall -be extended to include no less
than two (2) parking spaces on each lot. Find attached
Exhibi t "E" - Townhouse Chart, which is a comparison of;
building, pool and screen enclosure setbacks, location of
parking spaces, floor area and lot area of the site subject
request and three other PUD townhouse projects approved by the
Ci ty Commission. The applicant is proposing the minimum
number of parking spaces of two per unit, but does not include
~ them within the boundaries of the lot of the unit. The zoning
code requires that "parking spaces for all dwellings shall be
located on the same lot as the dwelling to be served". No
other "true" townhouse project in the city, even ill a PUD,
which generally allows flexibility with regard to building and
site regulations, in exchange for greater open space, exists
without parking provided within the lot boundaries. The
bui~ding Division has indicated that the city IS security
ord1nance would not allow parking spaces to be numbered (in an
Page 6
Agenda Memorandum for
october 2, 1995 city Commission Meeting
Tara Oaks PUD
MPMD 95-007
attempt to assign spaces to units). The reason for this is ~o
that it cannot be readily determined whether a homeowner 1S
home or not. There is much less of a chance of someone else
parking in "your" parking spaces if they are located
immediately next to your unit and on your property than if the
spaces where located on common areas.
5. Change the type and location of the recreation amenities from:
clubhouse, pool, jogging trail, picnic area and fishing dock
to pool, cabana (restrooms for pool), sand volley ball court,
jogging trail and gazebo or garden amenity - with respect to
the proposed changes in the location of the amenities, staff
is in agreement with the proposed locations. However as
indicated in the Recreation & Parks Memorandum No. 95-424, the
cabana is not acceptable as a recreation amenity that would
allow the applicant to receive one half credit towards
required recreation fees (one half credit applies to projects
that provide five (5) recreation amenities). Based on 192
dwelling units the full recreation impact fee associated with
the land value of 2.88 acres is required at the time of final
plat. The Recreation & Parks Department strongly recommends
that the applicant provide a clubhouse building which would
allow the applicant to receive one half credit for providing
five (5) recreation amenities. Providing a clubhouse or
recreation building is consistent with the development of
other cluster housing projects in the City.
6. Establish a 25 foot wide landscape buffer along the north
property, 15 foot wide along the east property line and 10
foot wide along west (Knuth Road) property line of the project
- The proposed landscape buffer areas are acceptable to staff
with the condition that the buffer area along the east and
west property lines be enhanced to include groupings of trees
(4 to 6 trees) with a spacing between groupings not to exceed
thirty (30) feet rather than one tree every thirty feet. The
spacing and size of the shrub material identified is
acceptable. ,
,
RECOMMENDATION
On Tuesday, September 12, 1995, the Technical Review Committee
(TRC) met to review the master plan modification request. The
Board recommends that the City Commission make a finding of no
substantial change for the proposed modification, and that the
Planning and Development Board approve the request, subject to the
staff exceptions listed above and the attached staff comments
Exhibit "F" - Police Department Memorandum No. 0168 and 0174,
Recreation & Parks Department Memorandum No. 95-424, Public Works
Memorandum No. 95-165, Engineering Division Memorandum Nos. 95-371,
95-349 and 95-304, Building division Memorandum No. 95-348 and 95-
299, Fire Prevention Memorandum No, 95-346 WDC and Planning and
Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-555. It should be noted
however that if the Commission concurs with staff regarg1ng tha
issues of the ~Kten.1on of S.W. oongre.. Boulevard and containing
parking within the lot boundaries, the master plan would have to be
revised. These revisions most likely will significantly alter the
master plan.
MEH:dim
xc: Central File
a,CCAgenda.Tara
E X H I BIT "A"
,
,
1=1 ~-*I3' ~ I I I I ...J
;' =--:J I U J~-j L-J - I::2:II$jljSi A
~ r~~ '.. fiC-~U:' -:L~ I . . "~C'-, C~. ',[!ff~
~- ~," -= ".' '~.3.'" IUI P, vO. r"'
-1_--1- ~. - p.L (!~4 \ W' 6CJ~ ,rON '_~~A(.#j -1 1~~~} V
_.....L f- !1f ',I! '-'ll"P .........~'-c::l i ~:r:l.HJ
C I Wi, Jl~r.' . ~ S: ,~~ t E
~'CC 1 ,.~_i?l.f_.~~ PI; I;" "0 0 - -t~a:~,~'.'.::.,.!. II' ~f'
- i ",.c. - I ~I". . :: _;., 1 :' _ ,
' : FIf.'-' ". . N,cl '.Ir . - -< ~... j' ; !H" I 71,
.
". ' f II ~ IT I l~ II g:J ~ l-- _ : <'
~. "~ .:":",, ~ Q~ : ~ i r:: t:ITJf 11
· \\ I [1:'... " ~. . lJ ~ /', /'00.,-((1;01 ! E:,;'U\
. L- I I ,. ~ I ' II . ~ I R IZ!: c; ~ -1 1----'" ~I' II
- - I::Joi ON \~;:... '- II f! ~ 'i r-,' ~, , !;;;> ~ :""'~liTl
\. - : ;, '1:1r::: ~ // / ~ f. y')"" .
V. ..L: ~~ ~::::J li_?jr:-:~. -;0 ." t,., ,-,rlr T~ H;::~ l( "~YD ~.
1-' ...~ :iMn ri i fFil I I : ;11 rt \;\' ,_ ~ ..,
, )? \~.\\i\\'\:\\\::i L' (~ lrt[Jn~ TJ_Dt_~'I' I' .., i Ii" ".;;~ .'~~:',."
L ":'#':" ~h I. j, -'. ~ .,.,' '"', J"
~ ~ ::\\\\\1\\::\ {I u.;:,;. '... .~ 11; ~::;IY.~ ~:~ b>~\\'
1/1 : :' !:......:~..... LV.'. 7' I EB D~ I I- v,..; :s '_ . ~H _. ~~ . .
// : ~:~. :\\rt ll~:::' i~' 1:,~,-<-=-~,o'-o1r"""':~-~ .-" ~~ C'J-' : ~ . _ -= _ _~ .. : /.'
. '.' :::-:':':':':'.''''- ,J ~. L'-- '<1 J .... ~ j' ~ . t .
" ................~. .~~ ."'\. -. ." ~ ~, I <_ tf-- rr _.
- ~. :::::::::::::::: 'j. &/ \ - ..:k'...... j- -)-I"~ .... I
J ~. ::::::~~::::::: <' 1>- itll , rnyllllll y 7'"A '" T . ~_ ~~ ___ . __.
/------""%1" -~:'_..~ ~... '.' ... -r .....,.. q 1 I I R:3 JI
.~~-:::.-=f.;' .. - -L- ---L_ Ts IV .6.'", ""I-'ch/c W(}t-i. 8R,';"" !?(Y1
.... ~ - . - .. ',Jr';--u.~ e,LI :~ ",:'1 , /. "~';I t',f~r<:
- ---).'Dj -Fr ~~ \ t'~.. ..; : - .; . ,.- ,...... ':-~,~ . l,/ -<,J;~! ,.;1
"- f 1 l A. "~ ','i,': ' ~ :',..p('
.......... : ~ U r- . rfffi ~ I - ~.e;./\" \
.? ~.' : " ,no ' - ,.. , \Y,) ~.;;. ,II
>' Ify en'....1 i ~ Zi.,. II,' '.. T 1; ~EiC :>;;'I..~. . .(;)
.- ~ -: .... ~ Je!f.'l. ,_. I!T I T~J ~25' \ .~).
,. . l' -' . . .--.. ~ \.'>1\.-~J.\J
~ ' ...:::- - l-hr'-' CI~ . . l~(
1 ,,,-,' Ji' ., : "' . .T ~ "~... .. .... ~ ..'<A~l('!o ,'"
l.. '.I " Ii . I - - - - I - ~~ I I f ~./ d
- -- ., ). -(
.~ I...~.AK II ,r ~ ~{.x.. \
\'., I r ". - .. Sio _ --1- 'i- TI/' {J..::t- ~; "" Y..1oJ ':,.~). ..
I ~ t \;::: ~ '.Iin >> = _ /.. ?--L~ ~~ ~~ '\)-.
! \ n -; ;~" "I ~." ~~ . 0< .; ," A
~._r: ~~~--=-~ . J.'f..'.'l'd~, : QJ C1 nJ-" ]:~ ...., U
- ~If\r TT~\:...J
.. ~ 5~ R3 ___. I-~' t... 1- U \,
ftt ""'PI'
~UIlH::
, .~..... - 1/8
~0~ -,'~ ','.ti~ 1:'~~-g~~III~ II1I II _
~/., 1- ~~' -~ - - < ~'O 400 '800 FEET
/ *-' ~ . ~ ~ r - j \---. ~_ 4. Il II. '1' q '7
"', (~,J I=-r "I r:~AI\{FtI nll(~.: I~::~-~ PUIMMI/'oJr; OFPr.
LOCATION MAP
TARA OAKS
Qi--:GIrrl"i1
J -.r:.:::L::.:I_ J~
E X H I BIT "B"
,
,
; "'{ ....r. ~ [~'H7
9~~
\
KUdey & Auoclet..
Landscape Archltectsl Plenner.
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(4071 689-5522 · Fax: (4071 689-2592
August 31, 1995
Ms. Tambri Heyden, Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach Planning & Zoning Department
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: Tara Oaks PUD
Minor Master Plan Modification
Our File No. 738.2
Dear Ms. Heyden,
Please accept and process the attached revised Information for a Minor Master Plan Modification
to the previously approved Tara Oaks PUD, located north of Woolbright Road and east of the
future Knuth Road. We are submitting this revised Minor Master Plan Modification application
on behalf of Pulte Homes Corporation South Florida Division contract purchasers of the property
and Bill Winchester, owner of the prpperty, and incorporating comments received at the August
15, 1995 TRC Meeting,
The latest Master Plan approved on June 8, 1990 reflected a total of 192 multi-family units on the
northern portion of the site, an open space/preservation area centrally located, and a church
parcel on the southern portion of this site, The proposed Master Plan retains the 192 previously
approved units which will now be developed as fee simple townhomes. The open
space/preservation tract remains centrally located, and the church parcel remains unchanged on
the southern portion of the site. Attached with this application is a revised Master Site Plan for
the project reflecting proposed building locations and corresponding lot lines, access points, the
recreation area and parking configurations. The Cooceptual Landscape Plan specifies proposed
landscape buffers and plant material requirements, A previously approved cross section is also
included with the submittal set. This cross section has been revised to reflect an agreement
made between the Stonehaven Home Owners Association and the property owner The
conceptual engineering plans, as well as a boundary and tree survey, are also attached.
The perimeter landscape buffer and the building setbacks proposed are consistent with those
previously approved. Minor adjustments have been made to the main access for the PUD, The
church parcel, which Is under separate ownership, will retain the two previously approved. ~ccess
points, The previously approved plan reflected two main access points to the residential ~Iilrcel.
This has been reduced to one main access point which will be controlled with a security ~ate,
Three emergency access locations are proposed elsewhere along Knuth Road. These access
Ms. Tambri Heyden
. August 31, 1995
Page 2
points will be stabilized to support the weight of emergency vehicles, They also will be gated
and locked pursuant to the City of Boynton Beach Fire Rescue requirements, The developer of
Tara Oaks will be constructing Knuth Road from just north of the L-25 Canal south to Woolbright
Road including the required crossings over both the L-25 and L-26 Canals. Concurrent with this
roadway construction, an eight foot wide bike path will also be constructed on the east side of
Knuth Road adjacent to Tara Oaks PUD.
A private recreation site of 1.75 acres Is provided for Tara Oaks PUD. The active portion of the
recreation area is provided adjacent to the main entry, This recreation area has been relocated
from the site shown on the previously approved Master Plan to address conditions imposed on
the original approval. A passive recreation component consistent with that previously approved
is shown in the open space tract and will consist of a jogging trail through the
preservation/relocation area and a gazebo or garden amenity at its terminus, A total of five (5)
recreational amenities are proposed to receive one half credit for the public recreation land
dedication. Consistent with the past approval and the comments again Included in Parks and
Recreation Memorandum #90-229, the developer will pay a fee in lieu of land dedication for the
public park commitment.
The attached plans have been revised addressing those issues raised at the TRC meeting of
August 15, 1995, and subsequent items included in the TRC comment memorandums issued by
each reviewing department. The following is a recap of the comments included in the
memorandums and subsequent re~ponses by the project team,
,
POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO, 0158
1 . The final approved Master Plan depicted Southwest Congress Boulevard to be terminated
into a cul-de-sac per the request of adjacent residents, The proposed plan shows the
western right-of-way stub of Southwest Congress Boulevard to be removed,
2, The developer Is investigating the feasibility of providing 24 hour access through the
automatic gate entrance system, A telephone access system or a similar feature will be
provided,
RECREATION AND PARK MEMORANDUM NO. 95-371
1. Attached is a statement from our environmental conaultant etatlng that the permit from the
Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission will not ohange the Master Plan as
shown in order to comply with the requirements of the permit.
2. A Tree Management Plan and an Environmental Assessment are forthcoming. In the
attached statement from the environmental consultant, there Is reference to the Tree
Management Plan and the Flora and Fauna Survey,
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-255
1. The revised Conceptual Engineering Plan shows water and sanitary sewer being provided
to Pod 3,
Ms. Tambri Heyden
August 31, 1995
- Page 3
2. The project engineer Is aware of the comments and will Incorporate them in their final
plans,
3. The revised Conceptual Engineering Plan showing a connection to the existing 10" water
main on Southwest Congress Boulevard.
BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO, 95-299
1. It is the intent of the developer to plat this project.
2. There is an adequate number of parking spaces for each town house, These parking
tracts will be dedicated as either easements or common parking and access tracts.
3, The recreation building will be constructed along with the construction of the first town
house building,
4, The final Site Plan will comply with parking signs and handicap code. A complete Site
Plan application will be processed following Minor Master Plan approval.
5, The final Site Plan will show the established easements and setbacks as they relate to the
town houses, A complete Site Plan application will be processed following Minor Master
Plan approval. ,
,
FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO, 95-325
1 , The approved Master Plan depicts Southwest Congress Boulevard terminating Into a aul-
de-sac per the request of the adjacent residents. It Is the Intent of the developer to have
the western right-of-way stub removed,
2. The attached Master Site Plan has been revised to allow for turn-around areas with a
radius large enough to accomodate a fire truck.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO, 95-304
A. The U.S, Postal service will be contacted to verify which roads will require naming, these
names will be incorporated Into the Site Plan application following approval of the Minor
Master Plan application.
B. The trafflo Impact etatement will be revised to reflect the redistribution of traffic pursuant
to the removal of the Southwest Congress Boulevard connection to Knuth Road,
C, The Master Site Plan has been revised to show sidewalks on both sides of the internal
roadways, The sidewalks will be In compliance with Chapter VI. Article III, Section 11 A,
Page 3 through 6 of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances.
D. Deed restrictions will be established to provide for a property owners association to pay
for the operation of a street light system within the development at the time of plat
approval.
Ms, Tambri Heyden
August 31, 1995
, Page 4
E. The engineer for this project has certified that the drainage plan will comply with all City
codes and standards and a copy of this letter has been attached for your review.
F - H. The engineer is aware of the comments and will Incorporate them Into the final
engineering plans.
I. The eastern 25' of the 80' right-of-way has been dedicated, This dedication has been
recorded in O,R.B. 7324, Page 1162,
J. Acceptance from South Florida Water Management District and Lake Worth Drainage
District will be required prior to final engineering approval.
K A permit will be obtained prior to working within the right-of-way per Chapter 22, Article
2, Section 7 (A), Page 22-3.
L. In lieu of providing sidewalks on both sides of Knuth Road, the developer has agreed to
install an 8' wide bicycle I pedestrian path along the east side of the road,
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-145
1. The Site Plan has been revised to accomodate sanitation vehicles. As per our meeting
with Mr. Robert Eichorst, the garbage collection areas will be located at the time of final
site plan approval. ' ,
RECREATION AND PARKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-379
1. The recreation dedication requirement calculation has been shown on the Master Plan
(page 10f 4).
2. The five recr..tlonal elemente conllletlng of a Iwlmmlng pool, . .and volleyball court,
jogging trail, gazebo 1 garden amenity, and cabana have been shown on the Master Site
Plan and Master Plan. The appropriate parking spaces have also been shown along with
the required handicap spaces, It is the intent of the developer to utilize the cabana as
one of the five amenities, but no meeting area Is proposed. An alternative amenity will
be provided if this is not acceptable.
3, It is the Intent of the developer to provide a cabana as one of the five amenities, but no
meeting area Is proposed. If this is not acceptable an alternative will be provided,
4. The developer agrees to construct the jogging trail with asphalt or another permanent
surface to minimize maintenance. The revised Master Site Plan shows the jogging trail
(1320 linear feet (1/4 mile) In length).
5. Details for private recreation equipment will be provided during the Site Plan Review
Process,
6. Parking spaces will be provided for the two recreational elements In the southern portion
of the P.U.D. These spaces will be noted on the final site plan,
Ms, Tambri Heyden
August 31, 1995
. Page 5
7, It is the intent of the developer to construct a detention area leaving the rest of the open
space pod in its natural state thus maintaining its natural characteristics, If a lake was
constructed in the open space area, the number of preserved trees would decrease,
8. The preservation area will remain in the southern portion of the property.
If you have any questions or concerns in regard to this application, or If you need any additional
information, please do not hesitate to contact either Marcie Tinsley in this office or myself. Thank
you in advance for your past time and future consideration for this project.
Sincerely,
c~l~~
Kilday & Associates, Inc.
Enclosures
cc: Sussn Prillaman, Pulte Home Corporation South Florida Dlvlalon
Yvonne Zlel, Traffic Consultant
Jim Drotos, Shaw, Drotos
6~ ~"
. Received a(
Date
~~/9~
CW/jb/heyden.B31
Engineering
Surveying
Planning
r"'4 iI -... A SHAH
-. -- ---
~- -.-
~DROTOS
~ASSOCIATES
.901 N.W. 17th Way
Sulle 404
Fl. lauderdale. Fl 33309
PH: (954) 776-7604
FAX: (954) 776-7608
August 30, 1995
City of Boynton Beach
Engineering Department
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
Attn: Mr. William Hukill, P,E.
City Engineer
Re: Tara Oaks
SDA Project No. 95-0261
Dear Mr. Hukill:
The master plan is in complianc' with all City codel and standards, Chapter 6, Article IV.
Section 5A, pg. 6-7 and Chapter 23, Article lIF, pg, 23-8 of the Boynton Beach Code of
Ordinances for the master plan requirements.
If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesistate to contact me.
Yours truly,
SHAH, DROTOS & ASSOCIATES
~~
d-- /' /
- - ~
mes F, Orotos, p, E.
Florida Registration No, 35505
JFD:laf
L015.004
.
--...-
Environmental Consultants, Inc.
222 S. V,S. Highway One. Suite 201 · Tequesta, FL 33469 · (407) 744-7420. Fax (407) 74-1-288-
August 21, 1995
City of Boynton Beach
PO Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0130
Re: Tara Oaks Gopher Tortoise Relocation
'.~ ': D [g (S ~ 0 v.J7 r~ r,;J
:1 ---'--'-_._--',_:'._~ ".: i .! ~
! i 1, . AUG 2 3 1995
li:~
I! ; \
IJ
Ann: Mike Haag
Dear Mr. Haag:
" Approximately 55-60 gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus) are predicted to occur
on the Tara Oaks parcel. This estimated figure was determined using the burrow survey data
and data resulting from burrow investigation with an infrared video camera, The site has
been significantly impacted by prior land usage and clearing activities. These activities ha\e
significantly degraded the available gopher tonoise habitat on the parcel.
,
The Tara Oaks parcel comprises + 24 acres. Florida Game and r-rcsh Water r:ish
Commission (FGFWFC) studies indicate lhill \l11l: ~llpll\.:r IOrloisl.: rC<luin::o; 1111l:-half 10.51 ,1I.:r,'
of suitable habitat for long term survival. .\pprI1\IIIHllely 30 acres of llplll1lal habital \~Ollld
be required to support the predicted Tara Oaks gopher tortoise population. Currently, lhe
parcel supports a population density in excess of this recommended density and. as such.
on-site preservation is not a viable option due to the presence of insufficielll, low quality
habitat on the Tara Oaks parcel.
C&N recommends off-site relocation of tile entire population to a large, regional
gopher tortoise re-stocking area. Mr. Tom Stice (FGFWFC) concurs with the survey
findings and the need to accommodate the tortoises through ofT-site relocation (telephone
conversation August 21, 1995).
An off-site relocation plan is being prepared for submittal to the FGFWFC. Upon
authorization of the off-site relocation permit. the tortoises will be captured and relocated to
the designated recipient site.
The listed flora and fauna survey also identified three scrub mint (Conradina
grandiflora) plants which are slated to be relocated to the proposed on-site preservation area.
No other state or federally listed floral or faunal species were observed on the Tara Oaks
parcel.
\.
'-:::-4
"-'"
The off-site gopher tortoise relocation permit issued by FGFWFC will not alter the
Tara Oaks Master Plan or Site Plan as shown in order to comply with the permit
requirements, nor will the proposed tree relocation plan.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely.
C&N ENVIRONMENTAL CONS LTANTS, INC.
c~~(k
Pres idem/Sen ior Biologist
CMC/aj
cc: Kevin J, Hallahan, City of Bayman Beach
William V. Hukill, P. E., City of BO)'111011 Beach
. Susan Prillamall, Pulte Home Corp.
Marcie Tinsley, Kilday & Associates
95-041
,
,
Hid';Wi~ ; ~I 1
.i..;i~~I~~ ; ,It J Gl- i :
r:H: iF 19] j ~~1 :'111
~ 'i ~ Ii In t ~~! ~
j - .:;1 I. VI, ~ S'
! ~ ~~: i .
~~!c!! ~:~,~ m~::~:i
1> .~~~ ~ '1)
O~.,~ ~.~
T.~.~ ~:;:
vt ,~'t
..
~~':'!~=~'~::~il'I' ~ -I
"'J~.:il.~1 ~!ll ~ 1"-
J.I .i~!~dUI '" m
l~j'h~d..I;'; 1-
I~! JI)iiil1ji ~
H. i.l,,:,.h,lo. 'I ~
"'! ~~-iI ,_,'..
!i oIUhll~~,
~ ,~~....., .1
!~. I! 1:;:::iI
!i~JllJ= ,
.,.;: 11. I~. I
h;: l:lil 1.~:: I
_Il --.:I :II iE ,
i i ~~... "
.. J':' ~ ~
~! !, j f-
· ! I 'Ii
. !l
'.. ,..a.
~'~1i~'1
I QIl;: C-
o '.
~ ".-
~ . 't
~ i_
-"
L.
" .
i ..-:
, I
Ii .;:
t-3
>-
~
b>
-' 0
:>
~~
~ 00
t-cS
c:::
t::t
"7=
::-0
7 .~
;::..
~ ::
"f.
~=
--:
-=::-
~ ~lIIc; Ii' ,..
a : iuw:l If
::! -. - i a
"lI_'" n "'C
; U21 '"
I 3 ~ ~
t=f,,~:
~g. gS;g
~.. -2.0
0..., ..,_
1~ ~:
~ d a
..... D "
'-'fJ,I i
g: ~ :
",0
,-
N
Ul
lD
N
I.=--= -
.) . .:.:!: ~,~ - ': ~ ; ~! ~
:: ~ ~.; ! "t1 ~ '; .~ ~ ' .,: ~ ~ ~
4ii ,} ~i~iz fii. !.!.!
llil IUll':ii lHi
m t H! I ! I: .: . ~
l~h '!It ~I.. i
! Ii: : Ji I i It
1111 III II!.
i~' J
.;i' Iff i
il 1
19:- i
r.. ~
JU 1
1
~
"
.
';.; I
'T '~I
>~!, "- l:i..
t;~. ~."_
i,!~~ "'- 'jj',
'~i _.._.._~. :.-..+-..--" ii
-I
t>
~
1>
o
~
1]
t:
P
~
~
iO
o
(J)
I:
555 s
o
L
, '-I
Uj~H~i:jj
il", 11 . n
~~i i I ~
HI J'I 5
Ih
:$~
to:::;;:
H~
.::~!
--:-.
~i~
-~;lI
=!I
~Il:'
'il~
;&
4",
i
---- .-......_~-
'!
..-........
..........--....
~l II'
lot 'Ii
'i hi
~
I
~ I
. I
i I i
.
. ~
'i ~ \
,.
!
~
~ _e-' ~,~ J
c'"
~ ~ I
- - .-.--:-. ;:; 'Jtl'. ~:J'
'r -..-"-j .-I!- EJ 11];1 h~.~ ~~
: i' ~ 0 'lP"l~llI
F --_.._-~. 1:- ~,t~: 8;0
,'. d. !' r .~~~ %13
; I _.._..1_ .--;..,: r 5,1;:; ~~
! I :: ..:! 0 - ~ f
i ~._:'-"_..---~i ~
i [-- ~ _.._._~ ~
! - -.. "-"i 1>
r" -.- ift 1\: F
p _._.._h_ '.__~ ~
{ L. -.,-"-'.- ~I ~
i ! h_ ._'~:rl 1
, r _._........~! ~
L..l--r~'~l
! .. ;:
! i ~
i i I
(Jl
'-I
it-
:OJ
~
rn
~
m
~
o
-<
1>
I ~
ICJ)
o
rn
-I
~
f".
i
I i I
Iii ! I
m!
'I I I
· i I
! I ;
! 1_
Ili;,,111 I
" 1111.. I 11
. ,,~
~ ~ ~II
~"{ - I~
-, .
~1~'~
-. [:~ .
· ]o:r:
()) -
Q N ;.
~ .
o ·
..
",
~~
....
f?
.... :-'.."
" ..
~:::
en :..
""" ~.
"'C
:c
o
"'C
o
en
m
o
3:
)>
en
n:1
:c
"'C
):
Z
'i 't~ n:
! . .
T. , t ~
tHi 3:11 i~~!
\i~i U~l ~i! i
i 1!i M
I '5 ':'
J is
I
i E
J!I' ~I;J.
lhi li II
is i
,I
II j'
E X H I BIT "e"
,
,
..
:e
:c
~
~
: a::
.)>
:en
.;:r1
JJ
1J
):
Z
....
4'
..1 ~\~~.' (., ~I.. ',.! tfJ'" .l1~ I''''
. M. ... I
t,'l-- . \.:J "
'. f, '''1I~ It. tn ra ~.
;1J~r~ ...- ~ ~.~ I .; jK I . '
.. " ,': I ' I" I
11, . '.. 'IIIJ' ,JJ"'- i.
l .. . 'mM \" ...
. . T" 1!r .f.t\~n .. '
I
1'''11111111I111111''. Iii
11:111111.1',1, '!I!:! Ji
J ,'I!llll:l!i!' lill:1 !f:
! 1~ld:I:II'i~11 'II;!;I
I IIIIJI'I!III I "I II:
!I~ ,i,:!,'d,d 1I~li
!'I;I'I'I '.Iell I'II~
'~IIII' IIII'!II alii:
n.. .1 Iii. I lu'~
'iiiiif 1,111 ;;~ jilt: i.ll; II"t'ili i I
; ~ 1115 i I I~, I I f(! III' I
: ;~!, ~i~ n. 111,lh I~IIII . ~
; I'l' III I,l i II I 1'."1.1'11.. II
. : .11 :I Jill J illll"1118
: h~ -, t ; I i III 11,.1 iI
U . a I ' 'I . I I
. U r I i'E I
;~ ,~~ I I I, illflf I
r~ ~ I I( .!!
! :! i f I. 1'111
r, if hi'I
f I I! hilI
I' II lul
I I f.'rl
. .1 IIJ. tI
II j 1111','( 1(li a
II i ! 'I ~ III J H 6
I ,'= 'I I
.'
J J'! 111",1 f'lfll:
& ~ I... .' '11 'II. I
i i II t;;,'"",.,. ~ .: . r';
..: .0. _, ".: .: .. ..
1'1111111111/111. i'-"I!!!! .
r . iI I I
I n;' · · I II' " 'I
I IU' · · I _I ,i r' . f
~~m::" ~. ,~J!)5 J i i!
I IU. · · I Ii I
I II" · " . _ '." ,
. II i ~
,
,
, I
~I
I,
I
:1
II
I~
I .
.1
! .
:l
r
II
-I
I
.~:-.
.<. I
,.
i~; J
If: 5
!.~f' ~ .
w ......
fl. tI
~II r1
, ~~
:3~
W
W
..
W
..
=':;t! ~
~"=i H
':I~ I .
::M t J
... ~... .
"'~n
..
.."'.
~~.
110
w,'
w.
..
...
~.g
..
~I!I a I
.......
...... 0
In'. II.
"'r'~
... .
. ... .
Il-~.
. ~=.
;!~I
WIS"
w...
au
.. ..
1 ...
.... .
...
. ..'
.. K
.
-f"M e
.. ...
0."'"
....,,~.
:::0'1 i1
n;
tr":: I
o ..
n ..'
=':== !II
.
j2~R
c..
........
.... "
... .
o .
..'"
..
..
..
.
..
:8'51 a
....~ 0" C
~i Ii
1111
, i ...
. III
.. toe-'"
~,.
W
~
...
..
mi!~:
.1'1 I
j J
E X H I BIT "0"
,
,
Taro Lakes Homeowners Association
43 Tora lakes Drive East
Boynton Beach, Fl 33436
Telephone (407) 732-5475
11-/{'
August 29, 1995
Ms. Tambri J. Heyden
City of Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Dear Ms. Heyden:
In following the newspaper articles in regards to the Tara Oaks project and furthermore to a
telephone conversation that you and I have had in April on the subject, we the residents of Tara
Lakes are pleased that the "City of Boynton Beach" has "approved" the extension of Knuth Road
through to Woolbright Rd.
In addition, we are pleased to learn that there are no longer plans to access the new community
from Southwest Congress Blvd. With this in mind, the community of Tara Lakes wishes to ask
that the City of Boynton Beach "temporarily" annex the small extension of road that goes beyond
Tara Lakes Drive West to the Tara Lakes HOA. In addition, a dead end barricade and caution
sign would need to be placed in that position where the road presently ends by the City of
. Boynton Beach to prohibit illegal vehicle traffic and dumping if this annex is allowed.
..
In regards to this matter, Tara Lakes HOA would like to place a basketball hoop in the "pro_
posed" area for the residents of our community to enjoy. As the paved extension of road exists,
there would be minimum cost to both Tara Lakes and City of Boynton Beach to allow for such
structure. In addition, the "ten1porary" annex could be removed at a later date if the decision
was made to connect Southwest Congress to Knuth Rd or other extension.
As the surfacing Is already prepared It would be a shame to see this property torn up when it
could be used for real community activity. Our plan would make the extension a small park.
Possibly a small ficus hedge would be added to give the area some needed aesthetic look also.
Please consider our request and advise if you think this is possible. I can be contacted at my
office at (407) 997-2299 during normal business hours or at my home In the evening at (407)
737-9173. We are prepared to contact the .City Commission" or other offioial if n.eee.ary.
In conclusion, thank you in advance for your consi?eratlon.
Sincerely,
(.1 . \ i"\
~~I\~\ \\~,t(!
Robert J. Lelssle
President
Tara Lakes HOA
Bob leissle
President
Bruce Orns
Treosurer
Arleen Cogoni
Secretorv
Tim Marshall
G~nerol
Alan landers
Landscape
Emil Moscoriello
Architurc I
Terry l_ Golembiewski
lITigatIon
E X H I BIT "E"
,
,
n 3:
..
'" tr1
II :r:
"
tt ..
..
n Po
~
" 1-'-
~ S
..
"
----.-
Z t"' :r: Hl on.... t<J() <:;0 t-3
o III 0 o III UJ tt1 He:::: ;J:J
~:3 ~ '<: ?;' 1-3t' t-f):> ::0
lD lD . ::l lD ):>):> t-ft-t ):>
U1 CIl CIl 01 rt<: 1-3::0 ):> "'0
o 1-'- t<J (/)::0 0 ~
'UtJj ::l([l (I) ::0 e:::: ):> 0
~O tJj tJj~ H "dZ ~ '-<
01'<: ([I "dt' e:::: {Jl tt1
C":i
rt::l Ul lD 01 e::::G) t' ~
rtrtPJrt t't'1 "d
0 0 e::::
::1 ::>' t'
c.n tJjc.nc.n::o I'Jj c.ntJjc.nc.n::o hj Ul trlUlUl;:tl hj UltJjUlUl::O hj
lD ~ 1-'- 1-'- ro I-l ([I ~ 1-'- 1-'- ro 11 ro ~ 1-'- 1-'- ro I-l ([I ~ 1-'-1-'- ([I I-l
'l:l 1-'- Po Po III 0 'l:l 1-" Po Po 01 0 'l:l 1-'- Po P. 01 0 'l:l 1-" Po Po III 0 ,....., t:z::l
01 ~lD lD 11 ::l 01 ~([IlD 11 P 01 ~([I ([I I-l P 01 ~([I([I I-l P He::
I-l Po .. rt 11 0. .. rt 11 0. .. rt I-l 0. .. rt ZH
III ..1._- 01 I-'~ -- 01 1-''' - - III 1-'--- ~b
rt::ltJ:lH I I rtP P1H I I rtPP1H I I rtP P1H I I <:H
1-'- lQ ::l ::l 1-" lQ ::lP l-'.lQ ::l ::l l-'-lQ P P HZ
0 p.rt Q:I: 0 p.rt Q:I: 0 Port Q:I: 0 p.rt Q:I: t::lC':l
P lD 010 ::l lD 01 0 P ([I 010 P lD pi 0 e::
.. ~I-l 1-1 ~ .. ~I-l 1-1 ~ .. ~1-1 1-1~ .. ~1-1 11 ~ >c.n
0 1-'- 01 [I) o 1-'- 01 [I) 0 1-'- IllUl o ~.- PJUl t""tt1
>-3
rtO lQlD rtO lQ lD rtO lQlD rtO lQ ([I t""t:z::l
-I-l lD .. -1-1 lD .. -1-1 ([I .. -1-1 lD .. 0>
.. - .. ..- .. .. - .. ..- .. >-3C":i
.. .. .. .. c.n~
Z .....NN N ..... NNN N ..... ..... N..... ..... .....Z..... - c.n
'- 0 0000 0 00 o U1 0 0 00 U1 ..... U1 U1 WOU1'-O
;J:J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -;J:J -
Z Ul s Ul::O Ill"d Ill"d
0 (J) III 1-" (!) ~O ~O
rt r1' 0. III ~O ~O
III tJo ([I 11 O~ 0 ~ c.n
'l:l III ::r .. ~ Ul ~ [fj tt1"'O
'l:l 0 In lD ([I >-30
I-l ~tJUl - p.P p.w too
0 ~ ::r 0 0 ~t""
<: 1-" III rt rt
01 ~~ ~
~ Po~ c.n
1-"
P
lQ
Ul ~Ul en S (/);:0 ((l ~Ul en ~ Ul lJ.l
lD I-' - ::r lD 01 1-'- lD ([I I-' - ::r lD I-' - ::r C":i
rtrtlll rtrt Po III rt rt 01 rtrtlll ~
tJ::r~ tJo lD I-l tJ::r~ tJ::r~ tt1
01 ~ III ::r.. 01 ~ 01 ~ Vltt1
0 tJ 0 U1 0 0- 0 tr' tt1Z
>-3
~~ 0 ~tr' - ~~O "'"~ () tot%)
Crt 1-'-0 ~ (/) CIl 1-'-0 tfl 1-'-0 >Z
~S 1-'- ::r ~S ~:3 C":iC":i
Po'l:l ~PJ p.'l:l Po'l:l ~t"'"
c.no
1-'- ~ Po~ I-"~ I-'-~ c.n
::1'-<: I-'-~ ::1'-<: ::1'-<: fJ
lQ P lQ lQ
lQ tt1
~N ~ t.) ~W ~.....
0 "'" 0 "'" 0 0 0 U1 ~
::l - P - ::l - P - H
lQ lCl lCl lCl ""',.....,..,
:€ :€ :€ :€ 0;3:
1-" 1-'- 1-" 1-'- OH'"<:l
Po Po p.. P. ..,Zt"'"
't:JHO
([I ro lD lD ~~O
H ~
X >: >: X Z
..,->
(J) , U1 -...I "'" !;:l;
0 , 0 0 Ln ~
- - - -
-- -.
~H P1 ~H trJ I-' H tlj .....H tr1
0 ::l ::l 0 P ::l 0 ::s ::l 0 P ::s
rtrt 0. rtrt P. rt rt 0. rtrt 0.
.. ([I .. ([I .. lD .. ([I t""
1-1 I-' 11 ~ 1-1 I-' I-l I-' 0
1-'- 0 1-'- 0 1-'- 0 1-'- 0 ..,
0 rt 01 rt 0 rt 0 rt I':j>
I-l .. I-' .. I-l .. 1-1 .. o!;:l;
W "'" ..... ..... O~
N N N W 0 0 V1 CO ~2
"'" "'" ..,. ..,. w - w -
- . - - ZH
U1 X X X ~ ..,Z
~ - ~ X . H
..... ..... -...I -...J :3:
~D X lD lD 0 0 0 0 e::
:3:
0 U1 U1 0 0 - - -
- lD - - - -
0
-
-- -,
N t.J t-J W Ul UJ NW
(J) lJ1 rt 1-" 0 - ~
en m O::S m ~~
rtHl rt Hl I-1lCl rtHl
o lD 0 ([I ,"<:1-' 0 ([I HH t""
~~ t::l
11 (tJ 11 (tJ ([I I-l (tJ H
...~ rt '<: rt '-<: rt Z
, , , '-' C':l
----- ----- ----
I-' 1-'- CD ~'l:l ::0 I-' I-'.ro I-''tl ::0 ~ f-'. ([l I-''tl ::0 (J)'t:! IlllCl 0 I-''tl ::0 "'0
0 ::l PJ 0 PJ ro 0 ::l Pol 0 III ro Q ::l PJ 0 III It I IlJ j;II (') I-l 0 0 ~ CJ) ~~
rt p. () n Hlg rto,n n 1-l.Q rtp,n n l-loCl en 11 () () S () t;.A ""dD~
. f-'.::r ru f-"P' ~ ~~ . f-'.::r III ..... r~ ([I ~(D ~ !:l 01 ~~
~~ p ..... t':l~H
<: rt f-' 1-'- <: rt 1-" f-'. < rt f-'. f-'- S ~~- (.) P 0 rt f-'- ~.. ;;::l Z
~. ([I ::1 I-l 1-" (11 ::l I-l 1-'- lD ::; t1 lD ::l ell '.L ~ ([I ...... ~. :;00
~. .
CL p"q (0 p. p., u.~ CD p. p, <Q I'D ::; I!~ P. III fD ~ t'<J
~ :: n, ~~ n, rlJ n- o rL t? ~G
- H
~jI , , 1-'- 0) ~ -:) )' .:) f ,- .,
il '.J ~,- ~..L I >-'j I ,.~
, .- ~ .-1 ~-, ,.,', f-' >' r'l .-, T'l COr
.-' .' .-.
il r ) .~
Ii :>: I
"
. - --- -:
t'tj
~
t:J
t-3
o
~
z
~
o
c:
Ul
tx1
()
=r:
~
::u
t-3
E X H I BIT "F"
,
,
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REF:
fi:I.,
~ ~h Ii If)
//;?} ~-~.f(ff. IP If )
I - ....04
T AMBRI HEYDEN. PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR ----.....J;~VG~!!!/;
SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT !..:.:',~/;1y'O ~f\-
11 SEPTEMBER 95 '
TARA OAKS 2nd SUBMITTAL MEMO #OI6H
BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC UNIT
I have reviewed the above plans and sti..!l:~fh~aih::pr~Vi'ou~.SP';~~ent from earlier memorandum.
In addition. there are now propose4.(~t:~~:gbndy)\cces~:'q~~~~:"along the western propel1y line.
along Knuth Road. The plans ~t;t.tc:'~'''ii;nd:S{ Box'; "iype lo~~( lam qQt sure what this concept
refers to, but if it indicates th9.;~.se ora'key to each gate and loc~'th~ri I would not recommend
this method of secUling an lE!lll~'rgency" access. These gates ckupl'~y:,an imp0l1ant pal1 in
evacuation of residents an<ttac4pal entrance for police critical inct4ent~,teams. Locating keys for
specific developments thr~,~e~qLt the city is not a prefelTed trend.\,:;,:,,;;.\ 'i(':i
I aiso maintain my previous position on S.W. Congress Blvd. The d~veiopment will only be
accessible from Knuth !tpad.::\.;ia W 'll}QYn!~n Beap\t:B.ty4.: or \Y9o.1Ptig,ht Road. Response time
for emergency vehiclesIW.ould,.be grqatlyj~9"ease~ .nd .Qffieer l{afety becomes a concern, I realize
.: ..... ",' ..... " .........,...,~...... " " ~ :0: ~:.
the objections from ClippcfCpye anpiir:ako,~'pfT~hFdcv61opmq~ts, b4t.J believe completion of
S.W. Congress Blvd wQdld.:cilhari"ct~,hisporisc tUndJo their cdmmwHties al~o. A traffic study was
supplied by Yvonne Ziel Consultants, Inc. regarding traffic flow and projected growth in this
ar~a. The study refers t~."a.:..,:I?2:P study an~ alijo J:ctle~tH the 1988 a~p~9y,:f~"pf 77 Hingle f~m~ I)'
uOltH fot" TaJ'a Oaks. TH'Cf'Sluf!l,r iN not valid a.t thIN pOint, 111'1 the proJC~~ .;}anN call for u'lphng the
number of units, thereby ..tripfihg the number of vehicle travel. Tar~,.Oak~::t'lt now planning on 194
units and I feel the study'lri"Cp~.~.~~? be redone and ful1hel' consider~.tl.9~:'~~ S. W. Congress Blvd
being completed should be i~;fhi'~~d in this project. ..:""" i<( ..)},/'
"":::~:;:~::::::::::::,:i .l"}:::::~~:::.:,:.,.,. :~::::.1: ...:':;::::::::;",:::::-::::~::::::::':::::;::.
l'./:' .): )::::::::::::::::;..,\, f'l '-,.,,'
::. ::. ,:' ,:' ,..
:..;....;:. i' J' 1....1,
:-:. :,'
. t
I: i
._ t.
Ii l
. i
BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC UNIT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REF:
TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR
SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT
2H SEPTEMBER 95
TARA OAKS - REGARDING MEMO #0163 MEMO #0174
This memo is regarding my earlier men.Jp.f:a~drdsJh~::th~ tf!!ffie.t1ow survey. I have had
conversation with Ms. Ziel rt?gardil1g:;~:p~:g4~Wittqd. ~ul"Vey,;;b:'I)(t"f:js now clear and I have no
problem with her traffic study 3;n;d s~~#.y.;;:::':fstill miintain::lDY' positi9O, on all other points
regarding this plan. ,,("';':: ',' . ::: " . ..
~:}
\::\. ..
Respe<:ttVr\l,
~~) ~)[fJ~~
tJ ~~ltH&1 Harris
Police Dep~11ment
;; . ..:;:".;
.( /:~;' ::: \ :~;
({//: ::ll
':: ",: ~ ::..... ~ :::
................ :..................,.....,:....
~. . ~::~:.::::-:::;:.:.;.:...;::::. .; .". . . " . ".'
. . . .~: r.._..._......:..~. \.
lt2) 0 Jt~5 tl
..;.......;...
\:<~;:,::~:::::~;~~.'i;\i
.".;:..:.::.:...::::'
.:: ::;:.......;..:,.
Lill/)
n (!::;}>
RECREA T10N & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-424
FROM:
fO) fL@ rn U w ~ rnl
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director lnJ [~~ 8 IOD5 II~
John Wtldner, Parks Supenntendent k : PU~~,NI~G Atm
WI 'II ,-I\' DEPl
..----....--.-
Tara Oaks PUD - 2nd Review (Mast Plan Modification)
TO:
RE:
DATE:
September 18, 1995
The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the masterplan modification (2nd review) for Tara
Oaks PUD. The following comments are submitted:
1. The developer appears to have addressed all comments in Recreation & Park memorandwn
#95-379 with the exception of #2 concerning the provision of a clubhouse/meeting room
which is still shown as a cabana.
2. A cabana is not considered a separate recreation amenity but is considered a part of the
swimming pool. This department feels strongly that a recreation center building
(clubhouse/meeting room) m lP1 essential part of the complete private recreation package for
this type residential development.
3. Representatives for the developer have indicated their willingness to provide a different 5th
private recreation element but not a recreation center/meeting room. We would llQt
recommend this as an acceptable alternative.
4. At this time, the Recreation and Park Department cannot recommend one-half credit for
privll1:e re~reatioq. provided.
5. Based on 192 D.U. X .0150 acres = 2.88 a~res recreation impact fee. Since tbe developer
is not recommended for one-half credit, the full 2.88 acres fee is required at the time of final
plat.
JW:ad
xc: Charles C. Frederick, Director, Recreation & Park Department
File
(.""11-
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #95-165
TO:
Mike Haag, Zoning Site Administrator
FROM:
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ:
Tara Oaks Master Plan Modification - 2nd Submittal
DATE:
September 12, 1995
The applicant at the above site has requested can pickup at these location for solid waste disposal
and recycling which could possibly be accommodated, however the location and accessibility for
servicing must be shown at time of site plan submittal.
,
,
obert Eichorst
Public Works Director
REier
if \ll~
'-~
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-371
I S
. f J,n!(
DATE:
Mike Haag
zoning/Site Administrator
wJAA'~m Hukill, P.E.
{j(j~Engineer
September 26, 1995
TO:
FROM:
RE:
TARA OAKS - TRAFFIC SIGNAL
As you know, Mr. Weisberg has informally reported that future
traffic at the intersection of Woolbright Road and Knuth Road is
not projected to warrant installation of a traffic signal at that
location. He suggests that it is possible for the City to require
the developer of Tara Oaks to escrow the cost of such a signal
($35,OOOI) to cover installation up to two years beyond development
substantial completion and subject to traffic counts at that time.
If the signal is not then warranted, the escrow payment would be
returned to the developer.
It is my opinion that 'traffic projections from Tara Oaks are so
light that the likeliho~d of a signal being required in the future
is minimal. If Knuth Road is constructed through to Boynton Beach
Boulevard, additional traffic would be generated at
woolbright/Knuth. That may be pretty much offset by the reduction
in traffic to/from Tara Oaks since residents and visitors will have
the option of going either north or south on Knuth Road.
If the Commission wishes to make the escrow arrangement described
herein a condition of approval of Tara Oaks, we have no objection.
WVH:ck
xc: carrie Parker, City Manager
Ken Hall, Engineering Aide
C:TARAOAKS.SIO
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-349
},.
'1-
DATE:
Mike Haag
zoning/Site Administrator
~'J~m ~ukill, P.E.
{jttij\~ng~neer
September 13, 1995
TO:
FROM:
RE:
TARA OAKS - TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
We have today first seen the September 12 traffic study for Tara
Oaks. The two significant requirements contained therein are a
right turn lane in at the project entrance and a southbound to
eastbound left turn lane at the Knuth Road/Woolbright Road
intersection.
Normally additional conditions would not be placed on an
application this late, but clearly it was the applicant's
delinquent submission of the traffic study which made it impossible
to respond earlier.
,
-
WVH:ck
C:TARAOAKS.TRF
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-304
DATE:
Mike Haag, Zoning/Site Administration
~~iam Hukill, P.E., City Engineer
August 16, 1995
~ ~ ,~,~,~~m_@
1
Pl~NN\NG AN TO \ C~
lONING DEP .
TO:
FROM:
RE:
TARA OAKS - MASTER PLAN REVIEW
We have reviewed subject development and have the following to
offer:
A. Verify which roads require naming (for mail delivery)
with u.S. Postal Service.
B. Provide Traffic Impact Statement. Chap.2, Sec.9C4h(5),
pg.2-85
C. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and
collector streets. Chap.6, Art.III, Sec. llA, pg.6-3
D. If street lighting is provided, establish deed
restrictions providing for a property owners association
to pay for the operation of the system within the
development. ' S:hap. 6, Art. I I I, Sec. 14, pg. 6-4 and Chap. 5,
Art.5, Sec.2A4, pg.5-9
E. Provide Certification by Developer's Engineer that
drainage plan complies with all City codes and
standards. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7 and Chap.23,
Art.IIF, pg.23-8
F. Minimum 15" pipe must be used in storm sewer. Chap.6,
Art.IV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7
G. Inlets must be in grassy areas unless otherwise approved.
Chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. 5B, pg. 6-8 and Chap. 23, Art. I IF ,
pg.23-8
H. Locate all drainage easements. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.6B,
pg . 6 - 9
I. Knuth Road is a collector road by both PBC and FDOT
standards (see FS 334.03(4) and must be dedicated to City
of Boynton Beach. Required dedication is 25'. Chap.6,
Art.IV, Sec.10U, pg.6-15
J. Need SFWMD & LWDD acceptance prior to Engineering
approval. Chap.6, Art.VII, Sec.4B, pg.6-24
K. Permits must be obtained for work within R.O.W. Chap.22,
Art.II, Sec.7A, pg.22-3
L. In lieu of providing sidewalks on both sides of Knuth
Rd., install an eight foot concrete bicycle/pedestrian
path along east side of road.
WVH/ck
(':TARAllAKS Ml'll
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-348
September 19, 1995
Wr~-'l[f 0 IV 1! JiII7
,ql: 'I/#fl
i.... rfJ'
Direct,or 'f'[~Jr, '1~ID
--~ ,,".' j.
}. -'r \ '"
.......
To:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning
From:
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Re:
TARA OAKS PUD
Northeast corner of Woolbright & Knuth Road extended
Building Division review of the response to our five comments in
Memorandum No. 95-299 (copy attached), is not acceptable unless
the plans show the correction. Our comments still stand, and it
should be noted that our code requires parking to be on-site with
the unit parking above the requirements allowed on common land.
AN:mh
Attachment:
Copy of Memorandum No. 95-299
Plans
cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Department of Development Director
,
,
Ilo,TAIlIloOIloIII.TIlC
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-299
August 16, 1995
To:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
From:
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Tara Oaks POD
Northeast corner of Woolbright & ICnuth Road extended
Re:
Since a description of the request is to modify the Master Plan
to change the type of units from apartments to townhouses, the
Building Division would like to make the following comments:
1. Site should be platted.
2. parking should be adequate for each townhouse on its
own premise.
3. Recreation bu~ldings should be constructed.
.
4. Plans should be in compliance with parking signs and
handicap code.
5. Plans should show established easements and setbacks as
it relates to townhouses.
'~~p
Al Ne 01
AN:mh
Att. Plans
cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Department of Development Director
A:TAItAOAIlS.TIlC
1'1 I:'; I':
\; I,
i ~ "
Fire Prevention Memorandum No. 95-346 WDC
i~ ... L' ~ ."'ift
~.i .,' i- r Br.
TO: Planning Department
FROM: Fire Department
DATE: September 21, 1995
RE' MPMD 95-007
Tara Oaks
Knuth Road Extended
The attached are the standard requirements for security gates, These requirements should be
reflect~d un the site plan,
" 1 (
/lj(;r;f({M2< i \
Will~m D. Cavanaugh, FPO I
cc: Chief Jordan
FPO n Campbell
File
,
,
.'.
SECURITY GATES AND EMERGENCY ACCESS:
The Fire Department continues to have the opinion that
security gates are detrimental to Fire and Rescue operations.
The minimum performance for security gates is as follows:
1- Gates shall be openable by telephone, with a call from
central Dispatch center.
2- when the gate is opened by the call from central
Dispatch, it shall remain open until the emergency is over;
at which time central Dispatch will be told, by officer in
charge, to close the gate.
3- In case of a power failure the gate shall open
automatically.
4- Appropriate "Hold Harmless" agreement re: damage to
gates equipment, etc.
,
,
PLANl1IlJG _~ND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 9~-555
FRO;'!:
Tambri J. Heyden
P 1 c'l.ll11ng and Zoning Di;.-~ctor
() fJ"'1'''x--
Michael E. Haag ~. U
zoning and Sit2 De ent Administrator
TO:
DJI.TE:
september 26, 1995
SUBJECT:
Tara Oaks (planned unit development) NPHD 95-007
l eliminatlon of the extens ion of s. \~. Congl-ess Boulevard,
alteration of the location and type of recreation, a change in
unit type from apartments to to\'mhouses, establlshment of
perimetel- buffer easen.ents and dwellIng Ulil t setbacks and
establish a parcel line between the new townhouse proJect and
the church property)
please be advised of the follo\"11ng comments relatlve to the second
reVlew of tha modified master plan for the above-referenced project:
1. \lith a distinguish.able symbol show, dimension and label 011 thi::
master plan the bUildIng setback on each side of the
parcel/property line that separates the church property from
the residential property. It is recommended that the setbach
dImension be labeled and sho\-m follOWIng the pel-imet8r ot Ule
open space area identified on the plan WIth tbe e~:ce:ptlon cd:
the folloWlllg specific setback dimensions for che f]aZc-bo:
south 20 feet, east 40 feet and west 260 feet. Change tlJe
setback note for the recreatlon area to indIcate that the 2~
ioot setback is fOl" all amenl ties except fer buildllll]S Wlll ell
shall follow the perimeter setbacks.
2. Add to the setback chart the side buildIng setback for the
Internal lots.
3. Modity the submittal to Include a survey of the entire PUD.
1. Specify on the master plan that the proJect shall be platted
and site plan approval is required for all Improvements not
included with the plat and construction plans of tne requlred
impl-ovements.
5. Change the name of the document from "Master Site Plan" to
"Naster plan".
,
,
G. Hodify the parJ"ing data for the recreation amenitIes to
Identlfy the correct number of requlred parklug spaces.
7. It is recommended that the landscaping proposed for the east,
west and south perimeter buffer easements be changed from one
tree every thil"ty lineal feet plus shrubs twenty four inch all
center to a grouping (4 to 6) small native or moderate drought
tolerant trees (minimum height 8 feet) spaced thirty feet on
cen tel' and large native (evergreen) canopy trees (milumum
height 8 feet) spaced sixty feet on center plus a continuous
native or moderate drough~ tolerant hedge (minimum height 24
inches) spaced two foot on center. The plan view will depict
the landscape material in meandering path rather than a
straight line.
8. Show on the master plan S.W. Congress Boulevard connecting to
Knuth Road extended.
9.
A revised master plan, which reflects all staff comments
conditions approved by the City Commission and Planning
Development Board, sllall be submit tad ill tr ipl iea tt; to
planning and Zoning Department, prior to initiating
plattlng process.
and
and
th-a
the
10. Parking spaces shaLl be provided on the same lot as tlle
dwellIng to be serv0d.
Page 2
Memorandum No. 95-555
Tara Oaks
MPMD 95-007
11. Compliance with all applicable comments regarding conditions
of approval of the 1990 rezoning.
12. Compliance with all comments regarding the City's and Palm
Beach County Traffic Division's analysis of the traffic
statement submitted by the applicant's traffic consultant.
(See Exhibit "A" letter from Palm Beach County Traffic
Division dated September 22, 1995.)
MEH:dim
.xc: Central File
a:Tara2
,
,
E X H I BIT "A"
,
,
September 22, 1995
Ms. Tambri Heyden, Director
Boynton Beach Planning and 10ning Department
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.o. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Fl 33425-0310
County Administrator
Ii ii.. Robert Weisman
; I Ii t.
, I' j.
Board of County Commissioners
Ken L. Foster, Chairman
Burt Aaronson, Vice Chairman
Karen T. Marcus
Carol A. Roberts
Warren H, Newell
Mary McCarty
Maude Ford Lee
RE : TAM OAKS
Dear Ms. Heyden:
P~r Mike Haag's request, the Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the
traffic impact study for the project entitled Tara Oaks, pursuant to the Traffic
Performance Standards in Article 7.9 of the Palm Beach County land Development
Code. The proposed project will consist of 192 multi-family residential dwelling
units and a 20,000 square foot church. The study reports this site to be
previously approved for 77 single-family dwell ingunits. The traffic study
addresses the increase in t~affic from the proposed project, minus the approved
project. The access points are all on Knuth Road. The build.out for the project
is 1999.
The traffic study addresses the traffic from a church only. We have been seeing
many of the 1 arger churches are being built with day school and day care
facilities. If the project has these uses, the traffic from these uses also
needs to be addressed.
The Traffic Division ha. determined that the project meet. the requirements of
the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. If you have any
questions regarding this determination, ~lease contact me at 684-4030.
Yvonne 1ie1's letter recommends a right turn lane on Knuth Road, at the
residential driveway, if Knuth Road is not extended to the north. While the
projected peak hour traffic volumes meet the County minimum requirements for a
right turn lane, there appears to be a flaw in the logic.
Right turn lanes are needed to remove slower turning traffic from the through
traffic flow. If Knuth Road is not extended north, there is no through traffic.
The right turn lane would serve no purpose. When knuth Road is extended to the
north, the traffic would probably be oriented more to the north. There would be
a need for a left turn lane at the residential driveway. There appears to be
only a short section of Knuth Road missing north of this project. It seems
logical to make the connection to the north in conjunction with this development.
Otherwise there will be a missing section of roadway in a fully developed area.
"An Equal Opportunity - Affirm<ltive Action Employer"
(~.
, '""'! .'''''Hl'd p., "" \ ,'!,.,I ;'.1.',,1
Box 2122'1 W,'st 1',11111 B".ldl, Florida 11-\16-1229 (.107) hHI--IOOO
September 22t 1995
Hs. Tambri Heydent Director
TARA OAKS
page two
SincerelYt
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
C) I)
u..(>Cl./;-, )J' Y~4_t:..<-)/
Dan Weisbergt P.E.
Senior Registered Civil Engineer
cc. William Hukillt P.E.t Director
Boynton Beach Department of Development
File: TPS - Hun. - Traffic Study Review
,
,
g:\user\dweisber\wp50\tps\boyn52
6.A.l
TARA OAKS POD
SUBDIVISION
Master Plan Modification
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-698
TO:
Chairman and Members
Planning and Development board
Tambri J. Heyden 19- tJ
Planning and Zoning Director
December 8, 1995
PROMs
DATEs
SUBJ:BlCTt
Tara Oaks POD - MPMD #95-007
Master plan modification - access, recreation, unit type
and use acreage
INTRODUCTION
Kilday and Associates, agent for Pulte Home Corporation - contract
purchaser of property owned by Bill Winchester, is requesting to
modify the previously approved (time extension also granted) master
plan for the Tara Oaks PUD, as described in the attached reports
(Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-541 and 95-597 in
Exhibit A). Tara Oaks is to be located at the northeast corner of
Knuth Road extended and Woolbright Road.
After staff review, requests for master plan modifications are
forwarded to the City Commission, prior to forwarding to the
Planning and Development Board, for a determination that the
changes requested are either substantial in nature or not
substantial in nature. This request went before the City
Commission on November 7, 1995, at which the Commission with a 3-2
vote, made a determination of non-substantial change and
recommended to the Planning and Development Board several
conditions (outlined below). The applicant pr~sented a master plan
to the Commission which reflected these conditions, but it had not
been reviewed by staff. Therefore, prior to the November 14, 1995
Planning and Development meeting, staff was able to convince the
applicant to request postponement of his request before the Board
so that another staff review could be conducted. You will recall
that the Board, at their November meeting honored this request for
postponement to December 12, 1995.
CONCLUSION
Despite the premise on which the April 1995 master plan time
extension was granted, the extension of S.W. Congress Boulevard was
decided by the Commission to have been resolved in 1990 as not
being required and to terminate in a cul-de-sac constructed to city
standards. The Commission is recommending the following to the
Planning and Development Board:
1. All residential buildings shall be moved out of the former,
S.W. Congress Boulevard right-of-way (in order for there to be
room to do this without losing units all of the recreation
amenities planned for Pod 1 have been relocated to open space
Pod 2 on the latest revised master plan) ;
2. A cabana shall be replaced with an 800 square foot meeting
room building having bathroom facilities to be eligible for
half credit resulting in payment of the value of 1.44 acres of
land;
3. To compensate for the "weak" recreation amenities, a sixth
recreation amenity (a full court basketball court) shall be
provided;
4. Required parking spaces for each unit shall not be required to
be provided on the townhouse loti
TO: Planning and Development Board
-2-
December 8, 1995
5. All turn lanes referenced in Planning and Zoning Department
Memorandum No. 95-597 shall be constructed;
6. A "Knox Box" shall be acceptable for police and fire emergenoy
adO... to the project. However, an unmanned seourity gate is
required at the project entrance;
7. Revised unified control documents shall be submitted to
reflect the change from rental apartments to fee simple
townhouses;
B. Knuth Road shall be constructed in its entirety simultaneously
with construction of the townhouse units and prior to the last
certificate of occupancy being issued.
The latest master plan (see Exhibit B) reflects the above
Commission recommendations, except for items 5, 7 and B. These
items are included in a new set of staff comments that have been
generated from review of the latest master plan. These comments
are in exhibit C and are recommended for approval.
TJH:dim
xc: Central File
A:TOaksPD
E X H I BIT
II A"
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-654
TO: Chairman and Members
planning and Development board
FROM: Tambr~ J. HeYden'7~~
Planning and Zoning Director
DATE: November 9, 1995
SUBJECT: Tara Oaks PUD - MPMD ~95-007
Master plan modification - access, recreation, unit type
and use acreage
INTRODUCTION
Kilday and Associates, agent for pulte Home corporation - contract
purchaser of property owned by Bill Winchester, is requesting to
modify the previously approved (time extension also granted) master
plan for the Tara oaks PUD, as described in the attached reports
(Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-541 and 95-597).
Tara Oaks is to be located at the northeast corner of Knuth Road
extended and Woolbright Road.
After staff review, requests for master plan modifications
forwarded to the City Commission, prior to forwarding to
Planning and Development Board, for a determination that
changes requeited are either substantial in nature or
substantial in nature. This request went before the
Commission on November 7, 1995.
are
the
the
not
City
RECOMMENDATION
At the November 7, 1995 meeting the Commission, with a 3 - 2 vote,
made a determination that the changes requested were not
substantial in nature and could be forwarded to the planning and
Development Board for final disposition. Despite the premise on
which the April 1995 master plan time extension was granted, the
extension of S. W. congress Boulevard was decided to have been
resolved in 1990 as not being required and to terminate in a cul-
de-sac constructed to city standards. Further, with their
determination, the Commission is recommending the following to the
Planning and Development Board:
1. All buildings shall be moved out of the former, S.W. Congress
Boulevard right-of-way (in order for there to be room to do
this without losing units some of the recreation amenities
planned for Pod 1 will have to be relocated to open space Pod
2 and will require a revised master plan);
2. A cabana shall be replaced with an 800 square foot meeting
room building having bathroom facilities to be eligible for
half credit resulting in payment of the value of 1.44 acres of
land;
3. To compensate for the "weak" recreation amenities, a sixth
recreation amenity (a half court basketball court) shall be
provided;
4. Required parking spaces for each unit shall not be required to
be provided on the townhouse lot;
5. All turn lanes referenced in planning and Zoning Department
Memorandum No. 95-597 shall be constructed;
6. .n... "Knox Eo:{" shall be acceptable for police and fire access to
the project;
TO: Planning and Development Board
-2-
November 9, 1995
7.
Revised unified control
reflect the change from
townhouses;
documents shall be
rental apartments
submi tted to
to fee simple
8. Knuth Road shall be constructed in its entirety simultaneously
with construction of the townhouse units and prior to the last
certificate of occupancy being issued.
In addition to the above, the planning and Zoning Department
recommends that the Board approve this request, subj ect to all
staff comments which are not in conflict with the above (Public
Works Department Memorandum No. 95-165, Engineering Division
Memorandum No. 95-304, Building Division Memorandum No. 95-299 -
except comment 2 regarding parking, Fire Department Memorandum No.
95-346 WDC and planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-555
- except comments 8 and 10).
tjh
A:ToaksPD
xc: central File
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-597
Agenda Memorandum for
october 17, 1995 city commission Meeting
FROM:
carrie Parker
city Manager
Tambri J. Heyden ~
planning and Zoning Director
TO:
DATE:
october 13, 1995
SUBJECT:
Tara Oaks PUD - MPMD #95-007
(Change in access, recreation, unit type and use
acreaqe)
please be advised that the above-referenced item is on the table
for the october 17, 1995 commission meeting agenda.
DESCRIPTION: A detailed description of this request is presented
in Planning and zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-541. You
will recall that at the last Commission meeting the applicant
requested that the commission table this item to the october 17th
meeting. You will further recall that the reason for the request
to table was to allow time for the applicant to substantiate his
claim that the description of his request in the above-referenced
report, specifically to omit the extension of S.W. congress
Boulevard to Knuth Road, was in error based on his belief that
the omission of this road was approved with the 1990 rezoningl
master plan for Tara Oaks.
Today the applicant plans to further research this issue by
viewing the files of the Planning and Zoning, Engineering and
Utilities Departments, since to date there has been nothing found
which supports, with total certainty, the applicant's claim.
Attacped is a reduction of the master plan, showing a cul-de-sac
terminating s.w. congress Boulevard rather than extension of the
road, which the applicant believes was approved in 1990 and
granted a time extension in April of this year. However, if
this is the master plan that was granted an extension, it
conflicts with the master plan staff presented to the Commission
in the backup for the time extension and conflicts with the
statements made by the applicant's traffic engineer in the
traffic report that was submitted with the time extension. If
staff's assumptions were incorrect (staff had no reason to
believe that they were incorrect after researching minutes and
files), it would have been appropriate and important to have
raised the issue at the time of the extension (the approval of
which spanned the course of five months between submittal of
extension and commission approval). As evidenced by the current
staff recommendation against this road omission, had this isaue
been raised with the extension, staff's recommendation would have
reflected the same concerns currently expressed.
At best, the June 19, 1990 commission minutes of the master plan
approval (ordinances approved later) state that when the
applicant presented a new master plan to the Commission that
staff had never looked at and which showed no S.W. congress
Boulevard connection, planning Department staff indicated that if
this road was not extended the right-of-way should be dedicated
for future road construction by the City if the need arose. The
proposed master plan does not reflect this either. In fact, the
current proposal shows 14 dwelling units and 23 parking spaces
within this right-of-way for the future road construction. This
leads to the argument that the 192 units previously approved
cannot be accommodated as townhouses within the acreage that was
previously designated for residential use, even with the very
small lot size proposed.
TO: Carrie Parker
-2-
October 13, 1995
Lastly, clarification is needed regarding staff's recommendation
for construction of turn lanes for this project. Based on the
attached Engineering Division Memorandum No. 95-379, received
after transmittal of the Planning and Zoninq Department's staff
report, the followinq turn lanes are recommended:
1. southbound left turn lane on Knuth Road into the
project;
2. Southbound left turn lane on Knuth Road at the
intersection of Knuth Road and Woolbright Road; and
3. Northbound right turn lane on Knuth Road into the
project.
RECOMMENDATION: staff's recommendation remains unchanged,
subject to further conditioning any approval of the project with
construction of the above-listed turn lanes.
tjh
Attachments
xc: Central file
A:TaraOMPM
~
r~
If
.
.-
i'
.
q
'1lnnl
i f ~ 'I L
iIJ.I.~ .
I I' I
ill! '
II
f g ~
· -c ::D
i !. >
31 ga. 0
I; ~ >
- ;:t;
! (I)
III
.
J ~
I C
j H~"1I
! tlf U
~ r I r>>
: . II
I j
I iUllliill!!I'lilllm:! I
J' 'IM';U:. IhlliJilll1 I
I. 'III"" 'II
! I ~llh ,1,j;I,II;;1
· 111!:U!lIII,11 It'I!''1 I
'I' Ih'lll, ' ,I
1'1:'" h'llll I~!I~
Itnl;Ir;; i'l Ilh:
IJ..hll,dd, lull
liliilf m~ 'Il~ i Ii II II! lilll!.11
Ii I!!! liill!ll'l. II'ljlll! II
; ",!Il! II 11111111 1IIIhll12
I.' I · il I., [ ·
I il I i f 1'llliI~1 i
; Ii i i I! I jil i
I I! iI 4111
I t n hll.
}I II ilil'
I I) tu.'rt
, . .,
1"IIII'i!"IIP i
J I I .1.1 ih ,I
I J I '! I
~
....
; I i: r: S i ill 1.
II. "...,,
i; I II
i i I is t ~ I' , ;
-, ~ III
I I I
, I .
11{11111I111',(III. I~i Iii I'
'i.1 I I I ,.11' hI
I' i
I"'" · 'II I " I I.
I m" ., I I ,;; I ~
Ii ~U" 'i'ii)1 II I!
I m" , , I I I' I I
'm' , " . I .',' I
i ,:
...,
--
'. ...:---:.... ~
,
" .
_n.
( woo c... L-.. .
(I I-
II rr:-~".'''~~'~---
81 ~ )..
II I (___\'\
i ; \ r-\ '-)
· \ 1(\ \ /
; r I J)I " ' ....) i
II II I \....~II
=f
If
ii
.
..
:
.
I
.
i
-
...:
I I
-
I
If
r
,I
i
r
,.
'1
-I
II.
:r
I 1,1
~
'.
:1 :: J
. .o-
.. .-
=j.."
2(B!
! .1
. ..
-..
....
-!"
..
..
..
..
..
-:-.~
:. :=.1
....,...
.. .
..~..
...
i. f!,"
"I;
. Ii
....
--.
.
...
w.
..
.-
-.
.
..
U:' J
.. c..
..- .
...- I
....-
~I:I
::..:: .
"1== I
. &:
::: J
wI..
iil
T'-
- ..
..
.. ..
.. :
-,-....
=: =~ e
:.~. ~
::!J II
:'1::-1
""....
..
.. ..
"..
r:! I
~:I
....
....
... ..
... .
. -
...
~
-
.
..
:r:, I
...; ...
::1-:.
;=p
Hli
I" ..
!'.:
.. .
......
-a-
..
..
..
..
.. .
::::-1
.. .11
;!!.I-
....a
::nI3"
......
"a."
~IJi
i J
/.."..
.'
~.-
. ~
J.->'
~}f."'''
~/'~
~,./
.///
. i
DE1ZLOPMEH~ DEPARTMERT
ERQIREERIRQ 8IVISIOR MEMORANDUM RO. 95-379
..
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning & Zonin9 Director
M~am HUkill, P.E.
~1J.f-Engineer
September 29, 1995
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
~ARA OAKS - DBCBLI!:RA~IO. LARES
We have revi.".d the Weisberg September 22 leee.r and find his
logic re..onable, particularly with regard to the southbound left
turn lane into Tara Oaks from Knuth Road. A right turn
(northbound) lane into Tara Oaks from Knuth Road also is desirable.
Neither has much value UDtil the "link" is constructed, but both
will be desirable at that time.
WVH:ck
"
C:TARAOAKS,LN
,.
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-541
Agenda Memorandum for
October 2, 1995 City Commission Meeting
FROM:
Carrie Parker
city Manager .~I.L.tJ
Tambri J. HeYd~~~
Planning and Zoning Director
Michael E. Haag
Zoning and Site Administrator
September 26, 1995
TO:
THRU:
DATB:
SUBJECT: Tara Oaks PUD MPMD 95-001 (change in access,
recreation, unit type and use acreage)
NATURE OF REOUEST
Kilday and Associates, agent for Pulte Home Corporation, contract
purchaser of property owned by Bill Winchester is requesting to
modify the Tara Oaks PUD master plan. The 20.16 acre proj ect
previously pla~ned for 192 multi-family apartment units, 20,000
square foot (650 seat) church and open space area is zoned PUD and
located at the northeast corner of Woolbright Road and Knuth Road
extended (see Exhibit "A" - location map). The requested changes
are limited to the north 14.410 acres of the PUD and are as
follows: (see E~hibit "B" - letter of request and proposed master
plan) :
1. Omit the extension of S.W. Congress Boulevard to Knuth
Road.
2. Reduce the number of access points into the project from
two (2) to one (1).
3. Increase in the size of Pod 1 (residential tract) by
incorporating, .6 acres resulting from the elimination of
S. W. CongresA Boulevard right-of-way. A new property
line which subdivides Pod 2 (open space) therefore
creating a project that consists of 5.69 acres for church
with open space and 14.1 acres townhouse project with
open space.
4. Change the type of units from 192 mult1-fam1lv apartments
to 23, two-storv buildings with a total of 192 townhouse
units. Zatablish the following building and site
regulations for the townhouse units:
.
BUilding setbacks (individual lots); front 10 feet,
rear 15 feet, side (end unit) 3 feet, side
(interior unit) 0 feet. Note minimum bUilding
separation is 15 feet.
Pool setbacks; pools not allowed.
Screen enclosure setbacks; shall comply with
bUilding setbacks.
Minimum living are. - 750 square f.et (propo...d
Unit sizes - 913 square feet, 1,079 square feet and
1,082 square feet)
BUilding height - Remains as originally approved
(30 feet, two stories)
Page 2
Agenda Memorandum for
October 2, 1995 city Commission Meeting
Tara Oaks PUD
MPMD 95-007
6.
Lot area - 1,260 square feet (end unit) and 1,050
square feet (interior unit)
perimeter setbacks: Increase the north setback from
20 feet to 40 feet. Please note the folloWing
setbacks 1-emain as previously approved; 40 foot
front (west Knuth Road), 40 foot rear (east) and 20
foot side (south). Also note the perimeter
setbacks take precedence over building setbacks for
individual lots.
Change the type and location of private recreation
amenities from a clubhouse, pool, jogging trail, picnic
area and fishing dock to pool, cabana (restrooms for
pool), sand volley ball court, jogging trail and gazebo
or garden amenity. The current and proposed location of
the recreation amenities are showf on Exhibit "C" and
Exhibit liB" respectively. I
Establish a 25 foot wide landscape ~Uffer along the north
property, 15 foot wide buffer alo19 the east property
line and 10 foot wide buffer along the west (Knuth Road)
property line of the project. Po 2 an open space and
detention area border the south property of ,the
residential tract.
5.
BACKGROUND
On June 21, 1988, the city Commission approved a master plan and
rezoning of the Tara Oaks PUD property from R1AAA (single-family
residential) to PUD with a land use intensity (LUI) of 4.00 for 78
single-family, detached units.
On December 18, 1990, after review by the Department of Community
of Affairs (DCA) and with objections, the City Commission approved
ordinances for a land use element amendment that changed the land
use classification of tbe property from Low Density Residential to
Medium Density Resident!al and rezoning of the property from PUD
(LUI:4) to PUD (LUI:5) with a master plan for 192 multi-family
units, private recreation and a 20,000 square foot church (see
Exhibit "e" - current master plan). The adopted compl-ehensive plan
amendment was transmitted to DCA on December 19, 1990, along with
responses to DCAls objections. In February 1991, the DCA issued a
notice of intent to find the comprehensive plan amendment in
compliance.
The 1990 applications were submitted under Palm Beach County's
current traffic performance standa~ds ordinance, however prior to
the effective date of the City'S concurrency mana~ement ordinance.
Therefore, concurrency certification for traffic and concurrency
exemption for draina~e and neighborhood parks were granted with the
1990 approval.
On June 2, 1992, the City COmmiS8ion approved a request to allow
construction of the south portion (adjacent to the church parcel)
of Rnuth Road, prior to preliminary plat approval of the property.
The reason for submitting the request was to ensure the Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints' purchase of the church parcel
within the PUD, which took place on June 26, 1992.
On June 16, 1992, the City Commission granted a one (1) year time
extension that extended the project's June 18, 1992 expiration date
to June 17, 1993. No application for extensions was made since the
June 1993 expiration, until a retroactive extension which was filed
Page 3
Agenda Memorandum for
October 2, 1885 city Commission M.etinQ
Tara Oaks PUD
MPMD 95-007
in November 1994; a period of one year and five months.
on April 8, 1993, the city Commission approved a master plan
modification for the Tara Oaks PUD to amend the condition of
approval which required the construction of Knuth Road to be tied
entirely to the Tara oaks PUD. The approval of the master plan
modification allowed the construction responsibility for Knuth Road
to be shared by the Knuth Road PC~.
on April 18, 1995 the city commission approved the retroactive time
extension submitted November 1994. The approval granted nine
months to file a plat application. The approval was also
conditioned upon the applicant evaluating reducing density at time
of the applicant's next submittal (subject request).
Chapter 2.5, Planned Unit Developments, of
development regulations states that changes
developments shall be processed as follows:
the City's land
in planned unit
Section 12. Changes in plans.
"Changes in plans approved as a part of the zoning to PUD may
be permitted by the planning and Zoning Board upon application
filed by the developer or 'his successors in interest, prior to
the expiration of the PUD classification, but only [after] a
finding that any such change or changes are in accord with all
regulations in effect when the change or changes are requested
and the intent and purpose of the comprehensive plan in effect
at the time of the proposed change. substantial changes shall
be proposed as for a new application of PUD zoning. The
determination of what constitutes a substantial change shall
be within the sole discretion of the City Commission. Non-
substantial changes as determined by the City Commission in
plans shall not extend the expiration of the eighteen month
approval for the PUD classification."
,
ANALYSIS
,
staff has reviewed this request for consistency with the PUD
development standards, and the intent and purpose of planned unit
developments as stated in the follOWing sections of Chapter 2.5 of
the City's land development regulations:
Section 1. Intent and purpose.
itA Planned Unit Development District (PUD) is established. It
is intended that this district be utilized to promote
efficient and economical l~nd use, improved amenities,
appropriate and harmonious variety in physical development,
creative design, improved living environment, orderly and
economical development in the City, and the protection of
adjacent and existing and future city development. The
di.trict 1. suitable for development, redevelopment and
conservation of land, water and other resources of the City.
". Regulations for Planned Unit Developments are intended to
accomplish the purposes of zoning, subdivision regulations and
other applicable City regulations to the same degree that they
are intended to control development on a lot-by-lot basis. In
view of the substantial public advantages of planned unit
development, it is the intent of PUD regulations to promote
and encourage development in this form where tracts suitable
in size, location and character for the uses and structures
proposed are to be planned and developed as unified and
Page 4
Agenda Memorandum for
October 2, 1995 city Commission Meeting
Tara Oaks PUD
MPMD 95-007
coordinated units.
Section 9. Internal PUD standards.
INTERNAL LOTS AND FRONTAGE. Within the boundaries of th.e
PUD, no minimum lot size or minimum yards shall be
required; provided, however, that PUD frontage on
dedicated public roads shall observe front yard
requirements in accordance with the zoning district the
PUD use most closely resembles and that peripheral yards
abutting other zoning districts shall be the same as
required in the abutting zone.1I
The following evaluates the significant issue relating to the
proposed changes:
B.
1. omission of the S.W. Congress Boulevard connection to Knuth
Road extended - This change will cause a redistribution of
traffic from the original approved road network. The Police
Department Memorandum No. 0168 indicates that the response
time for emergency vehicles to the subject property as well as
the Clipper Cove and Lakes of Tara development would be
greatly increased if the road connection was constructed.
The Lakes of Tara Homeowners Association has indicated that
they are not in favor of extending S. W. Congress Boulevard to
Knuth Road extended (see Exhibit "D" - letter dated August 29,
1995 from Lakes of Tara Homeowners Association). The
association has also requested some minor improvements to this
area that are normally paid by an applicant as part of
abandonment.
From evaluating the plan, it appears that the change in unit
type from apartments to townhouses and the desire to retain
the 192 units from the approved master plan, as well as offer
a privatized community, has driven the elimination of the s.w.
Congress Boulevarq extension. The reason for this is that
because of stacking and clustering of units, apartments
(previous master plan) more efficiently use land; yielding a
higher number of units per acre. Uni t types ( such as
townhouses) that only cluster units and not stack, require
more land area to yield the same amount of density, even when
both unit types are limited to two stories.
The argument often made of not wanting to extend an eXisting
road to a new project because of traffic and cU.v1.:l.on of
res:l.dent1al tract. 18 not applicable to thia project .inoe
even with the previous maste~ plan the project's residential
area was consolidated to one side (north) of S.W. Congress
Boulevard. Furthermore, the only traffic that will use S.W.
Congress Boulevard is the traffic generated by this project;
reason being the existence of Quail Ridge to the west and
therefore, the lack of further extension of S. W. Congress
Boulevard west of Knuth Road. .
.. This issue of connectivity of roads to. the existing road
network has been raised frequently over the past five years
due to increased popularity of privatized communities which
stems from increased crime or the perception of increased
crime. Rarely do applicants and homeowners understand that
with privatization, quality of pUblic ..rvic.. (response to
fire, police, utility emergencies and evacuations) decreases
not only to their development, but to surrounding existing and
future developments that benefit from the safety and
Page 5
Agenda Memorandum for
october 2, 1995 city Commission Meeting
Tara oaks PUD
MPMD 95-007
convenience of an improved, integrated road network within
their city or county.
In their memorandum the Police Department notes the benefit to
mUltiple communities when roads are extended. The pre-planned
extension of the existinG dead-end of S.W. Congress soulevard
was to provide quicker response by police units in the western
area of the city to the houses in the western areas of Lakes
of Tara which at this time only have access from Congress
Avenue. This Gives the Police Department the option of
sending a police unit from the east or west, or both if
needed, to best handle an emergency in either the Lakes of
Tara or Tara Oaks developments.
2. Reduction of the number of access points into the project from
two (2) to one (1) - Implementing this change would result in
the need for emergency access point (s) . As indicated in
Police Department Memorandum No. 0168, they have provided
emergency access points along Knuth Road, however, the "Knox
Box" type of entry is not acceptable to the Police Department.
It should be noted that access points restricted to emergency
vehicles, rather than providing a full access are less than
desirable and can reduce quality of emergency service too.
With the increased popularity of privatized communities the
fewer the access points, the lesser the cost to the developer
and homeowners to secure their access points with guardhouses;
or the less expensive method of automatic gates. Both Police
and Fire have been accepting these. alternative types of
access, provided the type of gate opening mechanism is agreed
upon, realizing that over time, the availability of these
emergency access points can be forgotten about and never used.
3.' Increase in the size of Pod 1 (residential tract) by
incorporating the .6 acres of the proposed elimination of s. w.
congress Boulevard and the subdivision of Pod 2 - These
proposed changes are acceptable with the condition that the
subdivision of pod. 2 does not decrease the total area of Pod
2 below the origiIl"ally approved 3.5 acres and that on the
master plan the acreage breakdown for each parcel/property be
delineated. As was noted previously in issue 1 above, this
increase in Pod 1 size is driven by the omission of the road
extension and the desire to retain the full 192 units.
4. Change the type of units from 192 mult1-fam1lv apartments to
23, two-story building. with a total of 192 townhou.e units -
All buildinG and site regulations are acceptable with the
exception of the location of the parking spaces and the size
of the lots. The lots shall -be extended to include no less
than two ( 2) parking spaces on each lot. Find attached
Exhibit "E" - Townhouse Chart, which is a comparison of;
building, pool and screen enclosure setbacks, location of
parking spaces, floor area and lot area of the site subject
request and three otherPUD townhouse proj ects approved by the
Ci ty Commission. The applicant is proposing the minimum
number of parking spaces of two per unit, but does not include
~ them within the boundaries of the lot of the unit. The zoning
code requires that "parking spaces for all dwellings shall be
located on the same lot as the dwelling to be served". No
other "true" townhouse project in the city, even ill a PUD,
which generally allows flexibility with regard to building and
site regulations, in exchange for greater open space, exists
without parking provided within the lot boundaries. The
bUilding Division has indicated that the city's security
ordinance would not allow parking spaces to be numbered (in an
Page 6
Agenda Memorandum for
October 2, 1995 city Commission Meeting
Tara oaks PUD
MPMD 95-00'7
attempt to assign spaces to units). The reason for this is so
that it cannot be readily determined whether a homeowner is
home or not. There is much less of a chance of someone else
parking in Uyourh parking spaces if they are located
immediately next to your unit and on your property than if the
spaces where located on common areas.
5. Change the type and location of the recreation amenities from:
clubhouse, pool, jogging trail, picnic area and fishing dock
to pool, cabana (restrooms fQr pool), sand volley ball court,
jogGing trail and gazebo or garden amenity - With r..pect to
the proposed changes in the location of the amenities, staff
is in agreement with the proposed locations. However as
indicated in the Recreation & Parks Memorandum No. 95-424, the
cabana is not acceptable as a recreation amenity that would
allow the applicant to receive one half credit towards
required recreation fees (one half credit applies to projects
that provide five (5) recreation amenities). Based on 192
dwelling units the full recreation impact fee associated with
the land value of 2.88 acres is required at the time of final
plat. The Recreation & Parks Department strongly recommends
that the applicant provide a clubhouse building which would
allow the applicant to receive one half credit for providing
five (5) recreation amenities. Providing a clubhouse or
recreation building is consistent with the development of
other cluster housing projects in the City.
6. Establish a 25 foot wide landscape buffer along the north
property, 15 foot wide along the east property line and 10
foot wide along west (Knuth Road) property line of the project
- The proposed landscape buffer areas are acceptable to staff
with the condition that the buffer area along the east and
west property lines be enhanced to include groupings of trees
(4 to 6 trees) with a spacing between groupings not to exceed
thirty (30) feet rather than one tree every thirty feet. The
spacing and size of the shrub material identified is
acceptable. .
,
RECOMMENDATION
On Tuesday, September 12, 1995, the Technical Review Committee
(TRC) met to review the master plan modification request. The
Board recommends that the City Commission make a finding of no
substantial change for the proposed modification, and that the
Planning and Development Board approve the request, subject to the
staff exceptions listed above and the attached staff comment.
Exhibit "F" - Police Department Memorandum No. 0168 and 0174,
Recreation & Parks Department Memorandum No. 95-424, public Works
Memorandum No. 95-165, Engineering Division Memorandum Nos. 95-371,
95-349 and 95-304, BUilding divi.ion Memorandum No. 95-348 and 95-
299, Fire Prevention Memorandum No, 95-346 WDe and Planning and
Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-555. It should be noted
however that if the Commission concurs with staff regarding the
i.eue. of the ~xt.n.lon ot S.W. congre.. Boulavar4 an4 containing
parking within the lot boundaries, the master plan would have to be
revised. These revisions most likely will Significantly alter the
master plan.
MEH:dim
xc: Central File
..CCA..nd.,T....
E X H I BIT "A"
.
,
!
LOCATION MAP
TARA OAI<S
-- t=I ~*=H3. -.'.: 'v" I.~....J...
~0 I U fVl.~~-:;::::::-_' '\ t:LiI055J :..:
~--, i- ~-- '.. ~~
- L--: .....-_' ~.~. I pc:e I I vO (
h 0-' :3--1t :~I I . Ufll_!~l .., ~60' TO'" -:=1r-2J.!!- I~::'':'\ '
'I I 1'1 I lc' ..r:::'';:: I ,1,1 i" ~
l ',I ~:. I ~." . ~~~ '-- : '- ~ t ~
C ~"""I 1 ~ ~~ ~'"'''<''.../''' :
~, ' f~" ~ I~'[ ~ [g) i tl~ ~ oc.fi_~1 ~ ~-'~!2JU:l';
" ,: '~=' ~ ~ 017'> :.!J tJj: tt= ~ 1.
U... I~ ~'J;I'\ .._. /) . ! ~ ! L~~il
.I ~J~. .11-lI1 U V1 ,r., .... .......:...i. - ~ : ~~u
-: I ~ .:! - I. ~ R ~ 'RICe; :s: h7
t=t! PN. ~"'~. . I, ~ :3 'i r- //.,T ~<". ~ ~ J'l}I/ri
f- ' I ~/r: Ll" , .. I
V . ' ,..~.,'tTJ-!!.~1 '~n.. >-! _ ~.. ~( '. f- ~I lI'-t,c.u b'
~... ............. ..-...... L ""l . I I l- ~~~.., ~.
I~ .... ~ ::::':';.::::::: ---I' i." TI'l.::JLl :., 1,Y:: . ~. -'
, ..'..,'.'. .,.,. 1 _ . -T . UJ1 \ tr- ~ '- '- ,
".:.:-:.:::::::: l.....~ ~il - I. I " /f.~. ~ "- ').. ..
.J~ ( ~ ;r# .. m!i' ~~~'::: \ ~ ,~~~:;II~" (.-..'....-::A.~/ ....:j;.~l\'
\ .::::~::::' I /5 J;! I: '. ,- ;,~-~......". JC~~ " " < . .... ..'
.~- ~\a\ I ~ A' : i 1 \ _ ~ ::..... '"~'''' V.'., . '(',,' .~~:-, '.<
( ~ ':-:':'.:,:.:.:,: . :l_ " t- I ~)~)'/'" " i ;.", '_~ ' .
.,'.:';.,..'.',.. I I . . , t- . .... r ,\--, . ... . . .... \ \
::::.:.:.:::::::. ," . 4/A . ~ , . . '. "'":.. "'., ~
\-. .,',..."" . /' . I/'!"'" .- \ - I,
\\\' ;::::::>:::::: - -v I:' '..;.j . ".' 0,' .'j-- :-= :: C. \. "
Ill' ,":,:',,",",,: -- ,~-'="~ 11. u. ...u_'!''' '- Ii I bOy: ~. iT""'! ::.R:3, ..- {
~' !.\ \ljTlrt15"7~:,lJH~:':fA-' :~ ~ J""'I ' f1'~ .~~.'\ ~ -l-~!I J~~~_:}l1;~~r'"
. \ '. ;:~!i~ I.,v.!., I .. CF .... h,.!!.=I_ ':,' ~ ~.
t:; .. : .:::::::::::::::: Il'.:,. t1 I:, J.u.:~: =-' --~. --'~ ~ C't-. : ~H E ~..
/ l~ ..tf\f /~~; '\'~~~/ltr). '\~ ,~~ .: l-~~' Tf - t. t
- II :':':'.:,:.:,:.: b ~,/ \1 1 ~ ....~""- I-.~"", -ca;)
" )< .:::::t~::::::: <' ..... ~rll 'rrnYlIIIII'> "!. ]~~ _______. _
-------- ..,.,'...,...,.."' , A o..J .'
.- .:~t~{ ~~ -~..~ ~. -.. -.,-- I q1 I r R:3
.~....::_...=~.~ --".. . --L-
11-" (S W .~.,.. ~H! h'~ ~f~L8~.,;~.; L
;"j6\ ~i\~ l ~~._...:~ ::~-- ,-f,] H N .1k~
..
- -
-
j t:1! n ' _ 'k.... ,~~ ~>-'w" ~
-
)... l ,~ ~~' ,),,~. ,. I . ~ . '!-.~"'~~
! / \ fl ~\J~'". I - f - " yr
l_=-~-=-=-=-=-~ U l\;...,"l'rf~:. ; lQl C1. :j- l+ ~ - 1- ---I
-,<to, \; ;~L., U
(-0~ .' ,- -: J :/;. I -)j1s '=: '= ~~rnIJ t . ~
~,/ ~~\ r-~. t~~~ ( . _ [~/L-r _.\-~i ~ ;t~~~.O 400. .82?.~~,~T ~r-('r. --:
E X H I BIT "B"
,
,
..'T.-r<~~-...'.'...
]jJ ~ ";';)
'\.
Kilday & Auoclat..
Land.cape Archll.ctal Plannera
1651 forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, florida 33401
14071 689-5522 . Fax: 14071 689-2592
August 31, 1995
Ms. Tambrl Heyden. Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach Planning & Zoning Department
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach. FL 33425-0310
RE: Tara Oaks PUD .
Minor Master Plan Modification
Our File No. 738.2
Dear Ms. Heyden.
Please accept and process the attached revised Information for a Minor Maater Plan Modification
to the previously approved Tara Oaks PUD, located north of Woolbright Road and east of the
future Knuth Road. We are submitting this revised Minor Master Plan Modification application
on behalf of Pulte Homes Corporation South Florida Division contract purchasers of the property
and Bill Winchester, owner of the prpperty, and incorporating comments received at the August
15, 1995 TAC Meeting.
The latest Master Plan approved on June 8, 1990 reflected a total of 192 multl.famlly units on the
northern portion of the site, an open space/preservation area centrally located, and a church
parcel on the southern portion of this site, The proposed Master Plan retains the 192 previously
approved units which will now be developed as fee simple townhomes, The open
space/preservation tract remains centrally located, and the church parcel remains unchanged on
the southern portion of the site. Attached with this application Is a revised Master Site Plan for
the project reflecting proposed building locations and corresponding lot IIn.., acce.. points, the
recreation area and parking configurations. The Conceptual Landscape Plan specifies proposed
landscape buffers and plant material requirements. A previously approved cross section Is also
Included with the submittal set. This cross section hal been revl.ed to refleot an agreement
made between the Stone haven Home Owners A.soclatlon and the property owner The
conceptual engineering plans, as well as a boundary and tree survey, are also attached.
The perimeter landacape buffer and the building setbacks proposed are oonslltent with thOle
prevloully approved. Minor adlultmantl have been made to the main acce.s for the PUO. The
church parcel, which Is under separate ownership, will retain the two previously approved. ~ccess
points. The previously approved plan reflected two main access points to the residential ~Ircel.
This has been reduced to one main access point which will be controlled with a security tate.
Three emergency access locations are proposed elsewhere along Knuth Aoad. These access
Ms. Tambri Heyden
. August 31, 1995
Page 2
points will be stabilized to support the weight of emergency vehicles, They also will be gated
and locked pursuant to the City of Boynton Beach Fire Rescue requirements. The developer of
Tara Oaks will be constructing Knuth Road from just north of the L-25 Canal south to Woolbright
Road including the required crossings over both the L-25 and L-26 Canals. Concurrent with this
roadway construction, an eight foot wide bike path will also be constructed on the east side of
Knuth Road adjacent to Tara Oaks PUD.
A private recreation site.of 1.75 acres Is provided for Tara Oaks PUD. The active portion of the
recreation area is provided adjacent to the main entry. This recreation area has been relocated
from the site shown on the previously approved Master Plan to address conditions imposed on
the original approval. A passive recreation component consistent with that previously approved
is shown in the open space tract and will consist of a jogging trail through the
preservation/relocation area and a gazebo or garden amenity at its terminus, A total of five (5)
recreational amenities are proposed to receive one half credit for the public recreation land
dedication, Consistent with the past approval and the comments again included in Parks and
Recreation Memorandum #90-229, the developer will pay a fee in lieu of land dedication for the
public park commitment.
The attached plana have been revised addressing those Issues raised at the TRC meeting of
August 15. 1995, and subsequent Items included in the TRC comment memorandums Issued by
each reviewing department. The following Is a recap of the comments included in the
memorandums and subsequent re,ponses by the project team.
,
POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO, 0158
1. The final approved Master Plan depicted Southwest Congress Boulevard to be terminated
into a cul-de-sac per the request of adjacent residents, The proposed plan shows the
western right-of-way stub of Southwest Congress Boulevard to be removed.
2. The developer I. Inve.tlgatlng the fea.lblllty of providing 24 hour acce.s through the
automatic gate entrance system. A telephone access system or a similar feature will be
provided.
AECREA TION AND PARK MEMORANDUM NO. 95-371
1. Attached Is a statement from our .nvlronmental consultant .tatlng that the permit from the
Florida Gam. and Fr.sh Water Fish Commission will not change the Master Plan as
shown In order to comply with the requirements of the permit.
2. A Tree Managem.nt Plan and an Environmental A.....m.ht are forthoomlng. In the
attached Itatement from the environmental consultant, there I. ref.ren08 to the Tr.e
Management Plan and the Flora and Fauna Survey.
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-255
1. The revised Conceptual Engineering Plan shows water and sanitary sewer being provided
to Pod 3.
Ms. Tambri Heyden
August 31, 1995
. Page 3
2, The project engineer Is aware of the comments and will Incorporate them in their final
plans.
3. The revised Conceptual Engineering Plan showing a connection to the existing 10. water
main on Southwest Congress Boulevard,
BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO, 95-299
1. It Is the Intent of the developer to plat this project.
2, There is an adequate number of parking spaces for each town house. These parking
tracts will be dedicated as either easements or common parking and access tracts.
3. The recreation building will be constructed along with the construction of the first town
house building.
4. The final Site Plan will comply with parking signs and handicap code. A complete Site
Plan application will be processed following Minor Master Plan approval.
5. The final Site Plan will show the established easements and setbacks as they relate to the
town houses. A complete Site Plan application will be processed following Minor Master
Plan approval. ,
,
FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-325
1. The approved Ma.ter Plan depict. Southwe.t Congre.. Boulevard terminating Into a cul-
de-sac per the request of the adjacent residents. It Is the Intent of the developer to have
the western right-of-way stub removed.
2. The attached Master Site Plan has been revised to allow for turn-around .reas with a
radius large enough to accomodate a fire truck.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT M~MORANDU~ NO. 95.304
A. The U.S. Postal service will be contacted to verify which roads will require naming, these
names will be Incorporated Into the Site Plan application following approval of the Minor
Master Plan application.
B. The traffic Impact etatement will be revised to reflect the redletrlbutlon of traffic pursuant
to the removal of the Southwest Congress Boulevard connection to Knuth Road,
C, The Master Site Plan has been revised to show sidewalks on both sides of the Internal
roadways. The sidewalks will be in compliance with Chapter VI, Article III, Section 11 AI
Page 3 through 6 of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances.
D. Deed restrictions will be established to provide for a property owners association to pay
for the operation of a street light system within the development at the time of plat
approval.
Ms. Tambri Heyden
August 31, 1995
Page 4
E, The engineer for this project has certified that the drainage plan will comply with all City
codes and standards and a copy of this letter has been attached for your review.
F - H. The engineer Is aware of the comments and will Incorporate them Into the final
engineering plans.
I. The eastern 25' of the eo' right-of-way has been dedicated, This dedication has been
recorded in O,R.B. 7324, Page 1162.
J, Acceptance from South Florida Water Management District and Lake Worth Drainage
District will be required prior to final engineering approval.
K. A permit will be obtained prior to working within the right-of-way per Chapter 22, Article
2, Section 7 (A), Page 22-3.
L In lieu of providing sidewalks on both sides of Knuth Road, the developer has agreed to
Install an e' wide bicycle 1 pedestrian path along the east side of the road.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-145
1 . The Site Plan has been revised to accomodate sanitation vehicle.. As per our meeting
with Mr. Robert Eichorst, the garbage collection areas will be located at the time of final
site plan approval. ' ,
RECREATION AND PARKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO, 95-379
1. The recreation dedication requirement calculation has been shown on the Master Plan
(page 10f 4).
2. The five reoreatlonal elements oonslstlng of . swimming pool, a .and volleyball oourt,
jogging trail. gazebo I garden amenity, and oabana have been shown on the Ma.ter Site
Plan and Master Plan. The appropriate parking space. have al.o been .hown along with
the required handloap .pace.. It I. the Intent of the developer to utilize the cabana a.
one of the five amenities. but no meeting ar.a I. proposed. An alternative amenity will
be provided If this Is not acceptable.
3. It Is the Intent of the developer to provide a cabana as one of the five amenities, but no
meeting area Is proposed. If this Is not acceptable an alternative will be provided.
4. The developer agrees to construct the jogging trail with asphalt or another permanent
surface to minimize maintenance. The revised Master Site Plan shows the jogging trail
(1320 linear feet (1/4 mile) In length).
e. Details for private recreation equipment will be provided during the Site Plan Review
Process.
6, Parking spaces will be provided for the two recreational elements In the southern portion
of the P.U.D. These spaces will be noted on the final site plan.
Ms, Tambri Heyden
August 31, 1995
Page 5
7. It is the intent of the developer to construct a detention area leaving the rest of the open
space pod in its natural state thus maintaining Us natural characteristics. If a lake was
constructed In the open space area, the number of preserved trees would decrease,
8. The preservation area will remain In the southern portion of the property.
If you have any questions or concerns in regard to this application, or If you need any additional
information, please do !lot hesitate to contact either Marcie Tinsley In this office or myself. Thank
you in advance for your past time and future consideration for this project.
Sincerely,
Co~I~~
Kilday & Associates, Inc.
Enclosures
cc: Sua.n Prillaman, Pulte Home Corporation South Florida Olvlalon
Yvonne Zlel, Traffic Consultant
Jim Orotos, Shaw, Orotos
/ ~ '
:.J~ CiR~'
, Received S(
Date
P&0s-
CW/lb/heyden.831
r-4. .... at SHAH
-. .- -....
~ - -.-
~DROTOS
Engineering
Surveying
Planning
IkAsSOCIATES
..901 NW 1 71t\ Way
Suite ..0..
Ft Lauderdale. Fl33309
PH: (954) 770-7604
FAX (9541 770.7608
August 30, 1995
City of Boynton Beach
Engineering Department
P,O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
Altn: Mr. William Hukill, P. E.
City Engineer
Re; Tara Oaks
SDA Project No. 95-0261
Dear Mr. Hukill:
The master plan is in complianc' with ell City cod.. and standards, Chapter 6, Article IV,
Section 5A, pg. 6-7 and Chapter 23, Article IIF, pg. 23-8 01 the Boynton Beach Code of
Ordinances for the master plan requirements.
If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesistate to contact me.
Yours truly,
SHAH, DROTOS & ASSOCIATES
~~
d~-- C-/
mas F. Orotos, P.E.
Florida Registration No, 35505
JFO:laf
L015.004
.
~
Environmental Consultants, Inc.
222 S. U.S. Highway One. Suite 201 · Tequesta, FL 33469 · (407) 744-7420. Fax (407) 7-H-288-
August 21. 1995
City of Boynton Beach
PO Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0130
Aun: Mike Haag
'~:D 1"2 ~ rs OVJ7 r~ 8'J
II rL5_~_h~.__._:"_.!::. '; ','
. ,.1,.
'1 .
!h., AUG 2 31995
d!,~
i J
Re: Tara Oaks Gopher Tortoise Relocation
Dear Mr. Haag:
- -_.~..._-........_-
Approximately 55-60 gopher tortoises (Gophems polyphemus) are predicted to occur
on the Tara Oaks parcel. This estimated figure was determined using lhe burrow survey datu
and data resulting from burrow investigation with an infrared video camera. The site has
been significantly impacted by prior land usage and clearing activities, These activities ha\"e
significantly degraded the available gopher tortoise habitat on the parcel.
I
The Tara Oaks parcel comprises + 14 acres. Florida Game and r-rcsh Water r-ish
Commission (FGFWFC) studies indicate thill lllle ~\lplh:r IOrlClilil: rC'IlIin.:.. Oll-.:.hlllt' 10.51 a...r~'
of suitable habitat for long term survival. .\pprll\lllHlldy 30 acres of llpllmal hahiwt \\l)ldd
be required to support the predicted Tara Oaks gopher tonoise population. Currentl)', Ih~
parcel supports a population density in excess of Ihis recommended dellsit)' and. as such.
on-site preservation is not a viable option dut: to lh~ presence of insufficient. low qual ilY
habitat on the Tara Oaks parcel.
C&N recommends off-site relocation of tlre entire population to a large. regional
gopher tortoise re-stocking area. Mr. Tom Stice (FGFWFC) concurs with the survey
findings and the need to accommodate the tortoises through off-site relocation (telephone
conversation August 21. 1995).
An off-lito rolocatlon plan i, bolns propared for ,ubmittalco chi FOFWFC. Upon
authorization of the off.she relocation permit. the lortolses will be. captured and relocated to
the designated recipient site.
The listed flora and fauna survey also identified three scrub mint (Col1radil1a
gralldiflora) plants which are slated to be relocated to the proposed on-site preservation area.
No other Slate or federally listed floral or faunal species were observed on the Tara Oaks
parcel.
.-::-~
....,
The off-site gopher tortoise relocation permit issued by FGFWFC will not alter the
Tara Oaks Master Plan or Site Plan as shown in order to comply with the permit
requiremellls, nor will the proposed tree relocation plan.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely.
C&N ENVIRONMENTAL CONS
c~~(k
President/Senior Biologist
CMC/aj
cc: Kevin J. Hallahan, City of Boymon Beach
William V. Hukill, P.E., City of BO)'1I1011 Beach
. Susan Prillaman, Pulte Home Corp,
Marcie Tinsley, Kilday & Associates
95-041
,
,
_ IJ
- :: III ; I
~i n ~ ." " .
't .:, I ;::; U ~'; .. ~
, . ~ I - 1;:,~ j ~
. ~: '.; 111 . a,- . J
~ '; · i 1;:;l:!!'4: l i
. i;: -: - I;:' . ~ I a~} .1
, II I II !~.. ~I
i - /1 J" (J), -- , I
. . If\ -., 1
- -f '43" ;
, ,!! ~.,~ aJ ..~::I :a j
1> '4~1 ; .~
9.~-::<4 ~ ~
,...:..~.,' I~ ~"E 1'1' ~ -I '" .~'lI
..~-~~ r~.11 ,;l l' ..
:fj~HJ~~Hhl'j! ~ t
IC.:r II ,. SI ...
:.i ! U,. ~l. , ~
.I! "j-. 'It. I
;!~ i~I!!!!7;J.
;~. is'' 4 r::::I
'~!11JIJJ I
Ii' .:: I ~ . ..' I
' -~ 3:~ 11 ',i ,
~; ~. 'I .
.. 17 ~
~i !I I ~-
. ~
~ ...
tfiJ!J'J
~~~f~frr
I ...
I :; "I.
1 .-
. I Ii 0;.
-;.- - &-::I
:::" 5' r-:::I
;;:l """"-
~;- .......
'f.~
-- >
--
-' <::)
--
:; :-
~b>
~~
tI'J
.-c
c:::l
t::t
~ !
; -
~ ! C'
i .,
I" ~
II;: ;;
t !t: 1';
i: .' ·
: . S . .II ....I...\....
: ,.~'._.._ ~.I' _.._;~ .. 0_
I ,____J
1-:'-:
~;'I' -;1 ;:! -f
; I '" ~: ,~~; - } ~ ~
· ! f~ . ~ po i1 ~
liJ d~ Iff;;. t:-
III1 HI:1 III Hi. ~
I=.t:, ~=II I.if -e 11:u
'i :~- !Ii .01 3 6
i. S S t Id , I.. a .
!Ir a.'1 U: ~
Illf If I lit . g
j(( I' J t>
.H' 'J~= a
'II - J en
,1 t
,! i I
:h 1
t
-.1
. il
.
I
I
I
S S ~
~ -... ~..",
C Q
... ~
,- .- .-7-- : ~ .",'. s,.
r -"-'-'-1, il lJ li'~ i~'
: j' . .: 0 i(F.1O ...~
.Ii.- - ._--~ ~ i~~l ~=
f'j ~. Ii r Ir::";o:."
i ;... _.._..J._ .-.;......1, r c~so ig
I I .. "'1 0 ! I-:il
.' . '. .
! t-. _.._._..__.~. ~
i ~_ ~ _.._-_~ i ~
:.... .._:; _.. "-'i;i t>
! '1> : r-
p ..-..-..- ---d
{ L. -..-..-..- ._~
i I -!
i ~. -..-.. ..;'- ---~
, l'!
L.. .-..-,,-..-...:::1..
l l t
I I S
i I I
~"'J,...I",
ii;,~,~.r ~
~U,' I ~ ': If'
11~ .... ...
~"I 'I 5 l! LII
!!~ -I !J I I
!~:;l -I. 1
i li~1 ,;,:;
.::!-.-
, iif pP
~ J fl (
~.., -9.
~o ~:
.~ ~
~ a g
-tA ~
g: ~ ;l
",0
,-
N
'"
<0
N
,~
L
. I -~~_:--.. ...------..........
i
"'0
:I:J
o
"'0
o
CJ)
m
o
3:
)>
CJ)
rr1
:I:J
"'0
~
Z
; i d, :'(
"l I. \i I'
~ J II' illl.
---
U,
'-I
it-
:(0
F
~
m
~
(j)
~
-<
iii t>
I 0
,~
~
~
. r- .
I
U'I III
lHi it!
s I'
I,
I
II
t; c t 1
I' t, i
~i!i ~:!1 I~:
tr 'loJ h
Ii J q! n
I iii '1
J iJ
I
I! I Iii
. I II'
I I I
i I II
I I It.
j; 11
E X H I BIT "e"
.
.
.....
4'
..1 ~\~~., (_ ~ '. I... W'i" .I1~ I' ro
. ~. .. I
nrll-- . 'I ... . :rc.. \'IJ . "
. . . . .. II~ I J · ~
'll~;r. :7. - ~",'. .; It I . '
. ,~ if ..4 I' . I
. ," I 1
,f. . . ~ . _.. I .,. ,.
1 .. AId" .
. . r 1 ~r ..S"~1l . ·
I
"11111"'1111'1111". (;
I" .111. 'II '~dJ! Ji
; Ilt~~IJlI~:II!I: 1l,lii; Ir.
I "II'I',le, II!,
. 'II J ; Iltl'II'11
I I,ll wH l'llllile ·
1..II;:,'lIlIe ,1;11
111"'il ~Je'l 1"1'
nU,'IIIIIII' III.:
II.. d ,d.. In"
.
:8
::a
~
~
:!!:
.)>
:(1)
'n1
:c
'1J
>
Z
;iiiiif 111;11;~ i III~ i IIi IJ&J,!f1i ; I
. ~ Iii' I, I~, I I I i(! I r, I
: l\!lli; II. 1'1 lilt l'l!t( . fi
,Iili III Ijl II n I Ui Iflllll, 'I
. i I~I ~~ i 'II ; 1IIII'illl .11
;J ~I i; 1IIIIill I
~~ ~ I ,( I,!I![
: '! i I I. ;III,I(
r, iI .1
I; I! hill
I' II fll I
I !.I linl
I II III II H ,,1111 9
II I .'r=P" I
I .I= ! I
,.'
U! IIU,lh,11
. i i Ilhl,;.,,:~II: IIII
11111I1111111111. i]~!!!I: .
, . I,..
I IU- · · I 'I " , I
I n;- , . I I . r' .
(!!!::" 'i .~J!)lr Iii ~
I m. · I I
'115' .. I' !. ~,
i I I!
-.----
. ~WDD c..... L-a. ..
~ I 1--
III ~~'='l':7~'~:- T
li'li llr~':.~ .----\~~,~~...
; '0 \...)
~\I~\ \, .!
. jI \ \,..)) IJi
I \ I' ~r
.' . --." . ,
\ 1-
'. \ '
...... ./ .
" F-/-,J
J /n) /1
~ I ~ l
~ I a 'i~I~~" II~ i ,I
, ",.. \ Ii t..
I I, 1 \ \,I~" :r
. "' I / a II
I \. I I ~ !
)J )) I ~ .
o / l 'II
' ~ /' ) I
-I a . ~ I. 1/1
I i. ~~". , -t~\.
i I ~I \ \ ~ II~
, 8 1 L \ "
~ \ I I J )\1 i.
1& : '1.:'1 J \ ~)) 'I
I ~ _ <,,/ -)It:
1 I I'
,1, \ I' '. I
I ' I,
t I "- I ;
) I-~~~ ~;~~.;.:;::
, . _?_---
4 ...", '''' - 1'\
I ' e. \ I
. I'r \
.1 ~ ,"" ":I~I~\ 1
, \ '. ~, I~I~ \.,1 ,
I, -\ J \ l . i
I" -" \ I
. " . :,~'J }I'j ~'::.: i
. '. I. .
, . J~ . .nl, .1:. ". .
I~! I " 1":/ . I.
)'1'" . ....,) / \
.' bL t\', . 1/;11 I I' .
I .~) \ at: l:f'l I.
. -~ '(l" w I
I I ~~: .: ..... _ :~:p':/~4 .
I ;/11 ., ____....-II_e
..--...,IILI...-..... -
. - --........... .......-.
I l. LWD'.' C.n': f...r
,,'-.- ,-
_ I'!'.. ':~ WOOLDDL - -d.GOIL
. I
'I
II , I
'J
:1
I(
I~
'1 . .
,
,
'~~-'
c.1
i~; J
II: ~
r.~n !i I
" .. II
.' II
~" If
. t:: '
;:J~
...
...
.
...
..
;,::= ~
="=1 H
':1.. I ·
::;' k' a
...f.... .
"'3"8
. 2.
..
.....
..... 1
.....
i~ I
....g
..
~I!( ~ I
n:.. a
~if~ I J
.1.. .
J".
. ~=
~~i
......
5;1
.. ..
,...
... .
...
. ...
· K
.
-f"" e
.. ..
....&It
..." WI'
:e", "" :!I
...= n
n:
:;Il''':: I
D5..
II"
!' t: r: III
. :II
is ~K
c..
.......
.... ..
.. .
. .
"r
..
..
.
..
il'EI !
..1."
Ei i
. Ilfll.
. Il
......
.....
...
...
..
...
..
It. _U'1
Iff" ~ ·
,(" .
i 'I I
E X.H I BIT "0"
,
,
Tara lak.s Homeowners Association
43 Tara lCIkes Drive East
Boynton Beach, Fl 33436
Telephone (407) 732-5475
illrn
August 29, 1995
Ms. Tambri J. Heyden
City of Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
PLMINlt!G t,11D
ZOtHNG ~EPT -I
Dear Ms. Heyden:
In following the newspaper articles in regards to the Tara Oaks project and furthermore to a
telephone conversation that you and I have had in April on the subject, we the residents of Tara
Lakes are pleased that the "City of Boynton Beach" has "approved" the extension of Knuth Road
through to Woolbright Rd.
In addition, we are pleased to learn that there are no longer plans to access the new community
from Southwest Congress Blvd. With this in mind, the community of Tara Lakes wishes to ask
that. the City of Boynton Beach "tempora.i1y" annex the small extension of road that goes beyond
Tara Lakes Drive West to the Tara Lakes HOA. In addition, a dead end barricade and caution
. sign would need to be placed in that position where the road presently ends by the City of
. Boynton Beach to prohibit illegal vehicle traffic and dumping if this annex Is allowed.
..
In regards to this matter, Tara Lakes HOA would like to place a basketball hoop In the "pro-
posed" area for the residents of our community to enjoy. As the paved extension of road exists,
there would be minimum cost to both Tara Lakes and City of Boynton Beach to allow for such
structure. In addition, the "ten1J:lorary" annex could be removed at a later date if the decision
was made to connect Southwest Congress to Knuth Rd or other extension.
As the surfacing la already prepared It would be a ahame to see thle property tom up when It
could be used for real community activity. Our plan would make the extension a small park.
Possibly a small ficus hedge would be added to give the area some needed aesthetic look also.
Please consider our reque.t and advl.e If you think thle la possible. I can be contacted at my
office at (407) 997-2299 during normal business hours or at my home In the evening at (407)
737-9173. We are prepared to contact the "City Commission" or other official I' neoe...ry.
In conclusion, thank you In advance for your conslperatlon.
Sincerely,
(1' ; '"I
i~'~~ \\\lY 'l(
Robert J. lel..'e
President
Tara Lakes HOA
Bob leissle
President
Bruce Oms
Treasurer
Arleen Cogoni
Secretarv
Tim Marsh
General
Alan landers
L .Jr'Q~':O~"
Emil Moscariello
Ar:hltucl
Terry l_ Golembiewski
lITigation
E X H I BIT "E"
,
,
. n 3:
..
In M
II :I:
"
tt ..
.
n Po
"
. ......
:.. ::3
.
.,
- I I
Zt"':I:Hltxlt'" MeJ ~iO >-3
o III o. o III CfJ M He: :t:-
~a~,,<:~ >-3t:.l t-t:t:- ~
ID ID . :::SID :t:-:t:- t-tt"1 :t:-
Ul CIl CIl tlI rt<: 8~ :t:-
'"
. 0...... M (/)::0 0 !::t'l
'UtxI :::SID en ::0 e: :t:- o
f-oOtxl ~ H 'UZ ~ ~
IJII<:IDtxI 'Ot:.l e: en t':1
rt::1enIDIlI e:G) t:.l n
rtrtlllrt t:.lM '0 -3
0 0 e:
::l ::T t:.l
CJ)tIlC/)C/)::o ITj C/)tr/C/)C/)::o hj C/) txlC/)C/)::o hj C/)tIlC/)C/)::o hj
ID C .....- ...... ltl I-: ltl C ............ ltl 1-1 ltl C ...... ...... ltl 1-1 ltl C ............ ltl I-:
'l:l ...... Q.. Q.. III 0 'tl ...... 0. 0. w 0 'tl ...... 0. P. III 0 'tl ...... P. 0. III 0 ,...... co
III f-oltl ltl I-f :::s III I-' CD CD I-f :::s III I-'CD CD I-: :::s IlIl-'roro I-f ::1 HO
1-1 0. .. rt I-fo. .. rt 1-1 0. .. rt 1-1 0. .. rt ZH
III .t.__ III ......_- III ....,.-- III .....-- ~b
rt:::SMH I I rt:::S MH I I rt::1MH I I rt:::SMH I I
......lQ ::1 ::1 ......lQ :::s:::s ......lQ :::s ::1 ......lQ :::s :::s C::H
HZ
0 o.rt Q:I: 0 p.rt Q:I: 0 o.rt Q:I: 0 o.rt Q:I: t::lC1
::s CD III 0 :::s ro III 0 ::s ro III 0 ::s ro 1110 0
.. I-'I-f I-fC .. 1-'1-: I-f C .. I-'I-f 1-1 C .. I-'I-f I-f C >C/)
0 ...... III en 0...... III CIl 0 ...... IlIC1l 0...... III en t""t':!
rtO IQro rtO lQ ro rtO lQro rtO lQro ..,
t""t::d
-I-: ro .. -I-f ro .. -I-f ro .. -I-f ([l .. 0>
..- .. .. - .. ..- .. .. - .. ~~
.. .. .. ..
Z ....NN N .... NN N N .... ....N.... .... ....Z.... - tIl
....... 0 0000 0 OOOUlO 0 OOUl....Ul Ul WOUl.......O
~ - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - ~ - - ~ - -:t:- -
Z en 51 (/)::0 III '0 III '0
0 ro III ...... ro 1-'0 f-oO
rtC"to.llI 1-'0 f-oO
III trOltll-1 01-' 01-' tIl
'tl III ::r .. ~en ~ [/)
tel 0 111 ro ltl t':!",
I-: ~trc/) - o.::s 0.::1 "'0
t::do
0 C::r 0 0 ~t""
<: ...... III rt rt
III I-'f-o ~
f-o 0.1-' tIl
......
:::s
lQ
CIl ~CJ) en 51 (1)::0 [/) ~c/) [/} ~C/) C/)
ro ...... ::r ro III ...... ro ro ...... ::r CD ......::r n
rt rt III ' rtrto.llI rt rt III rtrtlll ::d
tJ'::r1-' tJ'orol-f tr::T1-' trP'1-' M
III I-' III =:r .. III I-' III I-' tIlM
0 a- 0 U1 0 tr 0 tr' t':!Z
..,
~CO ~tr - ~Co ~Co t;dC"j
CIl ......0 C C/) CIl ......0 Ul ......0 >Z
1-'51 ...... ::r 1-'51 1-'::3 nn
o.'tl I-'IlI 0. tel 0.'0 ~t""
tIlO
...... I-' 0.1-' ...... I-' ...... I-' tIl
::1~ ...... I-' ::S'<: ::1'<: ~
lQ ::s lQ lQ
lQ M
I-' N I-' r.J I-' W I-' ....
O~ 0 ~ 00 0U1 ~
::s - ::s - ::s - ::s - H
lQ lQ lQ lQ ~-..,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~S~
.... ...... .... ....
0- 0- P. P-
ro ro ro Il) ;g~8
H ::d
X >: X X Z
..,->
CJ) , U1 ...., ~ ::d
0 , 0 0 U1 ~
- - - -
-
I-'H M I-'H trJ I-' H t'1 I-' H M
0 ::s ::s 0 :::s ::s 0 ::s :::s 0 ::s ::s
rtrt 0. rtrt P- rt rt 0. rtrt 0.
.. Il) .. ro .. ro .. Il) t""
1-1 I-' '1 ...... I-f I-' I-: I-' 0
...... 0 ...... 0 ...... 0 ...... 0 ..,
0 rt III rt 0 rt 0 rt ~>
I-f .. I-' .. '1 .. I-f .. o::d
W ~ .... .... o~
N N N W 0 0 U1 l>> I!
~ ~ oIlo oIlo .. .. .. ..
.. . .. ..
l.J'l . H ~ H H
H .. " H
.... .... ..." ..... c:
\0 X \0 \0 0 0 0 0 3:
0 In In 0 0 .. .. -
- \0 - - - -
0
-
-
N r.J r-' W CIl CfA NW
CJ) In. rt ...... 0 - t:l:I
CIl CIl o::s CIl ~fflS
rtHl rt HI I-flQ rtHl
oro 0 Il) '<:1-' o III HHt""
~C1t::l
'1 rtI '1 ro ro t; ro =H
'<:rt '<: rt '<: rt "'Z
, , , _ C')
-- ~---- ---
I-' t-J. (D I-' 'tl ::0 I-' .....ro I-''tj ::0 I-' .... CD I-' 'tj ::0 rD't:l IlIlQ 0 ...... '0 ::0 ...,
0 ::s ~ 0 III III 0 ::Sill 0 III ro o ::s I>> 0 ll.I III Ql III 0 ~ ~ o ,"II ~ r3~
(1' n. n n tl'f.l rt!:1.nn "1.Q rt~n n ;:1.~ CIl "1 0 0 O"1.g ~o~
. t-J.::r "J ,. - . .....'~. w ~~ . ......t;l' ll.I rD ::rrt'D r:: !El Cil~c ~z
<: rt ...... ...... < rt ..... ..... <: rt 1-" ..... IS ~,. el) ::s 0 rt ...... ....
~, (II t1 I-f t-J. Il' :::s I-f 1--" ro W I-: ([l ::1 ell ~:::l (II tJ ...~ :;OC1
r~ n. 'tl (D P. ,l. lL~ (tt Po ~lo lQ III ::J lfJ P.1l1 ID ~t'::
.' n. ~: ~l. ~ (I. rt ,,_"J n, e:lc
"-1
., ~; I , , ,..... (.1 ./ ... CoJ ':) I", ': .:) t. .; I
I, , .. ", .-. .,'1 f- , . . .' :
i, r )
I I
I: I
-
t-rJ
c:
tj
t-3
o
~
2:
::r:
o
c:
CJl
txj
(J
::r:
~
~
t-3
E X H I BIT "p"
,
,
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REF:
~~..
/ () ,-ti~
/ ~_.~"7 [/i
1.//1. '<, ~
/1/( / .... ~-..Ji /?
/ ., ;;~
, .. ..,t() ~
TAMBRI HEYDEN. PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR ~~~ ~
SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT '<:~~_~':.2f.!J sgf'-
II SEPTEMBER 95
TARA OAKS 2nd SUBMITTAL MEMO #OI6H
BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC UNIT
. .::....:.::..::::.:~.?
I have reviewed the above plans and st!l~:~fn~aih;pr~\IiOu~:S~lJ~!l1ent from earlier memorandum.
In addition. there are now proposed{7f~9rgcnqy Acces~::G~~~~:;along the western propelly linc,
.', .... .'... ,'." ,- .;. ~.., '. -',' .', :: "", .~. . '. . .'
along Knuth Road. The plans ~t_tc.'tl..t:~:!$.,nox Box" type '~~;' I 'amqQ.t sure what this concept
refers to. but if it indicates th9.J~'se of'a:key to each gate and loc~'tljeri I would not recommend
this mcthod of securing an "elll~rpency" access. These gates canp1.'~)'\an impollant pall in
evacuation of residents an4;~tacYfal entrance for police critical incl~erit~"teams. Locating kcys for
specific developments thi.~Oghqut the city is not a prefcl1'ed trend.'\\.. r'l
.~:t.(....).......,/ '<::=-"'::. .t.~
I aiso maintain my prcvious position on S.W. Congrcss Blvd. Thc d~~ei'opmcnt will only be
accessible fi'om ~uth~tpad;;:~.ia W.~Dy.~~~:n BC3f~:B.~~.~ or "Y.'9alb.Q~,~t Road. Response tim~
for emergency veh.eles ~14.;~e gr~l~.;.::~l!er. ease~ !n4}J~ficer :t,a[e. ty b~.eom. ~s a concern. . I reahze
the objectIOns from CII 'ter 9'Ye..anPlr:ak9~f>f T~~ldeV~lo~m~~~s, b~i} b~heve comyletlon of
S. w. Congress Blvd w . &1ld:lmhaa~,t~ponse tUnoJo theIr comWwUbe's al!!k>. A traffIc study was
supplied by Yvonne Ziel Consultants, Inc. regarding traffic flow and projected growth in this
area. The study refers tg...a..l99p study and alHo rctlectH tho 1988 appr!....'.:.~~pf 77 KinlJle family
unitH for Tal.. Oaks, ThirShi'il; 1M not valid at thhi point. aK tho projc~' PlanK call (01' u'lpling the
numbe.. of unltK. thereby tripljhs tho number of vehicle travel. Tar~.da . "i'" now planning on 194
units and I feel the Ktudy~rtCP~Jt:!P be redone and fulther consider~p.9~,~f S.W. Congress Blvd
being completed should be ilt~h1~~d in this project. ,,:<; ,;/;(:. }-I/
~) /JJ~'\ II ~~~'
,~ J ) ~ > 'l <. ........".-.. -",
::"" . 1..~l:' t.l .~...~...........;O':o";.
~e~~
Police Depal1ment
,
i: t
t ~ I,
d \
" : I
BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC UNIT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REF:
TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR
SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT
2K SEPTEMBER 95
TARA OAKS - REGARDING MEMO #0163 MEMO #0174
This mcmo is rcgarding my carlicr mCf9C?fllJfdfc~t~~:'th:~ lf~ffie.now sUIVcy. I havc had
conversati~n with Ms. Ziel n;gardi~~;~'~f::5~~~tt~fur~ey,::;:~'}4jf~t;. now clear and I ~ave no .
problem with her traffic study BAd sytv~y>':'f stili mamtam::my pOSltlQO on all othcr pomts
I . . . '" ..... . .'. . "','~
rcgarding this plan. lif...:."" .,:".:r ....
.... :::.
d
\;\: ::'~
Respcci~l\:t ,
'.[-5) rES) 1[5) r.:11J~~
C::S) ~.,~ I [~~:::::l) Wi ~ f-N<.w/ . .. ~ 1M., ""tl. U'o. .
."....._..,.,.' ~...il" ......ou.~,..."'.... t, L ~... g,... . a 'h..n IJ;l,QTfIS
Policc Dcp~:~~mcnt
r:~:::.::::::::::'::l
L::::::::::::.:;:;::::::~
ri
._..v:,.':') j
\,,,...........'"
~.......;..
(r..~;:\l
J. l'
.~::-.~. ~ i
,:~.:::::::l
.?!~~...
'f' "\":"'"''''
;. .j ;>"W'~;""::'.
i~:...f l .f '!}
~:1 LI
(~iZ{.:~::~
~l~: ~:.. "'lltt~,.' :llj"..,. '... ,.,' ~::
o~~rp)
r:'! ,;>"y ".u
~. \ (, (........:..:.:;.~:) ....
U ......_-
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-424
FROM:
fD) rn J~ rn n Wi rn rnI
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director 1I0 l~ 8 Ims I I~
John Wtldner, Parks Supenntendent ~ : PI!INNING JI.ND
"_ Z()fl!lll~ DEPl
Tara Oaks PUD - 2nd Review (Mast Plan Modification)
TO:
RE:
DATE:
September 18, 1995
The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the masterplan modification (2nd review) for Tara
Oaks PUD. The following comments are submitted:
I. The developer appears to have addressed an comments in Recreation & Park memorandum
#95-379 with the exception of #2 concerning the provision of a clubhouse/meeting room
which is still shown as a cabana.
2. A cabana is not considered a separate recreation amenity but is considered a part of the
swimming pool. This department feels strongly that a recreation center building
(clubhouse/meeting room) ~Qll essential part of the complete private recreation package for
this type residential development.
3. Representatives for the developer have indicated their willingness to provide a different 5th
private recreation element but not a recreation center/meeting room. We would JlQ1
recommend this as an acceptable alternative.
4. At this time, the Recreation and Park Department cannot recommend one-half credit for
private recreation I1rovided.
.
5. aaaed OD 192 D.U. X .0150 acres - 2.88 acrel rocroatioD impact foo. Sinco tbo developer
is not reconunended for one-half credit, the full 2.88 acres fee is required at the time of final
plat.
JW:ad
xc: Charles C. Frederick, Director, Recreation & Park Department
File
i,.,
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #95-165
TO:
Mike Haag, Zoning Site Administrator
FROM:
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ:
Tara Oaks Master Plan Modification - 2nd Submittal
DATE:
September '12, 1995
The applicant at the above site has requested can pickup at these location for solid waste disposal
and recycling which could possibly be accommodated, however the location and accessibilily for
servicing must be shown at time of site plan submittal.
.~~~
, v' ~~Eichorst
Public Works Director
REIer
\ ,~
t~
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-371
, (I
DATE:
Mike Haag
Zoning/Site Administrator
~JAA'Am Hukill, P.E.
{j(/fif\Eng i nee r
September 26, 1995
TO:
FROM:
RE:
TARA OAKS - TRAFFIC SIGNAL
As you know, Mr. Weisberg has informally reported that future
traffic at the intersection of Woolbright Road and Knuth Road is
not projected to warrant installation of a traffic signal at that
location. He suggests that it is possible for the City to require
the developer of Tara Oaks to escrow the cost of such a signal
($35,OOO~) to cover installation up to two years beyond development
substantial completion and subject to traffic counts at that time.
If the signal is not then warranted, the escrow payment would be
returned to the developer.
It is my opinion that '~raffic projections from Tara Oaks are so
light that the likelihood of a signal being required in the future
is minimal. If Knuth Road is constructed through to Boynton Beach
Boulevard, additional traffic would be generated at
woolbright/Knuth. That may be pretty much offset by the reduction
in traffic to/from Tara Oaks since residents and visitors will have
the option of going either north or south on Knuth Road.
If the Commission wishes to make the escrow arrangement d..cribed
herein a condition of approval of Tara Oaks, we have no objection.
.
WVH:ck
xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager
Ken Hall, Engineering Aide
C:T ARJ\O^KIUIO
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-349
)
DATE:
Mike Haag
zoning/Site Administrator
~'/~m ~ukill, P.E.
(jttU\ing1.neer
Sept~mber 13, 1995
TO:
FROM:
RE:
TARA OAKS - TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
We have today first seen the September 12 traffic study for Tara
Oaks. The two significant requirements contained therein are a
right turn lane in at the project entrance and a southbound to
eastbound left turn lane at the Knuth Road/Woolbright Road
intersection.
Normally additional conditions would not be placed on an
application this late, but clearly it was the applicant's
delinquent submission of the traffic study which made it impossible
to respond earlier.
,
,
WVH:ck
C:TARAOAKS.TRF
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-304
TO:
Mike Haag, Zoning/Site Administration
ttt~iam Hukill, P.E., City Engineer
August 16, 1995
mrn
~, ~'1-~.'rn
FROM:
DATE:
1\ h.
RE:
TARA OAKS - MASTER PLAN REVIEW
Plft.NNING AND
ZONING OEPl
("
~
We have reviewed subject development and have the following to
offer:
A. Verify which roads require naming (for mail delivery)
with U.S. Postal Service.
B. Provide Traffic Impact Statement. Chap.2, Sec.9C4h(5),
pg.2-85
C. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and
collector streets. Chap.6, Art.III, Sec. llA, pg.6-3
D. If street lighting is provided, establish deed
restrictions providing for a property owners association
to pay for the operation of the system within the
development. 'fhap.6, Art.III, Sec.14, pg.6-4 and Chap.5,
Art.5, Sec.2A4, pg.5-9
E. Provide Certification by Developer's Engineer that
drainage plan complies with all City codes and
standards. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec. SA, pg.6-7 and Chap.23,
Art.IIF, pg.23-8
F. Minimum 15" pipe must be used in storm sewer. Chap.6,
Art.IV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7
G. Inlets must be in grassy areas unless otherwise approved.
Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.S8, pg.6-a and Chap.23, Art..1IF,
pg.23-8
H. Locate all drainage easements. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.6B,
pg. 6 - 9
I. Knuth Road is a collector road by both PBC and FDOT
standards (see FS 334.03(4) and must be dedicated to City
of Boynton Beach. Required dedication is 25'. Chap.6,
Art.IV, Sec. lOU, pg.6-15
J. Need SFWMD & LWDD acceptance prior to Engineering
approval. Chap.6, Art.VII, Sec.4B, pg.6-24
K. Permits must be obtained for work within R.O.W. Chap.22,
Art.II, Sec.7A, pg.22-3
L. In lieu of providing sidewalks on both sides of Knuth
Rd., install an eight foot concrete bicycle/pede.trian
path along east side of road.
WVH/ck
(' TAil \(},\,,~ t-II'R
From:
~r~-'tll 0 W fl.r,ii'J II
,Ql, .!;#r;
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Direc~e;_'~:i:i.fP;w; 'l~!D r{Jj.G {
I' 'r ' "
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official'.'
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-348
September 19, 1995
To:
Re:
TARA OAKS PUD
Northeast corner of Woolbright & Knuth Road extended
Building Division review of the response to our five comments in
Memorandum No. 95-299 (copy attached), is not acceptable unless
the plans show the correction. Our comments still stand, and it
should be noted that our code requires parking to be on-site with
the unit parking above the requirements allowed on common land.
AN:mh
~t~1t~J
Al New old
I
Attachment:
Copy of Memorandum No. 95-299
Plans
cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Department of Development Director
,
,
A,TAIIAQAIII.TIICl
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-299
August 16, 1995
From:
Tambri Heyden, Planning &: Zoning Director
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Tara Oaks POD
Northeast corner of woolbright 1& Knuth Road extended
To:
Re:
Since a description of the request is to modify the Master Plan
to change the type of units from apartments to townhouses, the
Building Division would like to make the following comments:
1. Site should be platted.
2. Parking should be adequate for each townhouse on its
own premise.
3. Recreation bu~ldings should be constructed.
,
4. Plans should be in compliance with parking signs and
handicap code.
5. Plans should show established easements and setbacks as
it relates to townhouses.
.~~~
~
Al Ne 01
AN:mh
Att. Plans
cc: William V. Hukill, P.S., Department of Development Director
A:TAIlAOAIS.TRC
"
Fire Prevention Memorandum No. 95-346 WDC
TO: Planning Department
FROM: Fire Department
DATE: September 21, 1995
RE: MPMD 95-007
Tara Oaks
Knuth Road Extended
, The attached are the standard requirements for security gates. These requirements should be
reflected un tbe site plan.
'Il'
, '( ,
/t i~ t/f({/( (l ( ,
Wi11~m D. Cavanaugh, FPO I
CC: Chief Jordan
1<1)0 n Campbell
File
,
,
I! I;:
i ~ ,.. L 1 ~.; J J
: \ ,I L
\
SECURITY GATES AND EMERGENCY ACCESS:
The Fire Department continues to have the opinion that
security gates are detrimental to Fire and Rescue operations.
The minimum performance for security gates is as follows:
1- Gates shall be openable by telephone, with a call from
central Dispatch Center.
2- when the gate is opened by the call from central
Dispatch, it shall remain open until the emergency is over;
at which time central Dispatch will be told, by officer in
charge, to close the gate.
3- In case of a power failure the gate shall open
automatically.
4- Appropriate "Hold Harmless" agreement re: damage to
gates equipment, etc.
,
,
PLANHIlJG .~ND ZONIlJG DEPARTMEnT
UEHORANDUH no. ~~-5~~
TO:
FROJ.l:
Tambri J. Heyden
Plc.l,llllng and 20n1ng Di~"~ctor
C ~.fr~">r--
Michael E. Haag ~, ()
Zonlng and Slt2 De _ ent AdmInIstrator
DP.TE:
September 26, 1995
SUBJECT:
Tara OaKs (planned unit d~velopment) HPHD 95-007
(elinunatlon of the extension of s. \~. Congl-ess Boulevard,
alteration of the location and type of recreation, a change in
unit type from apal-tments to to\cmhouses, astablIshm8nt 0f
p8rlmeter buffer easell.ents and dll-lelllng milt st::tbci.cJ.s and
establish a par.::el line between the new townh(iUS8 ploJect and
the church prop81tYl
Please be advised of the follo\<ling comments relatIve to the second
reV18W of tha modif1.ed master plan for the above-referenced project:
1. Hith a distinguishable symbol show, dimension and label on tIlt::
master plan the bUlldlng setback on each .3id8 of tile
parcel/property line that separates the church pr0per~y flOUI
the residential property. It is recommended that tiit::: S<2tlJd~;1.
dimension be labeled and sho\m folloWlll.g the perinl.::::t<2r ot Ule
open space area identified on the plan WIth tlie e~~Cef>t10n (.r
the following specific setback dimensIon.:; for [1112 qaz-=b..l;
.3Cluth 20 feet, east 40 feet: and west: 260 fe:et. ,::hangl2 till::
setback note for the recreation area toindlcate ttat tlil2 2~
ioot setback is fOl" all amenIties except fer buildlihJS Wlll ell
shall follow the perimeter setbacks.
:2. Add to the setback chart the side bUildIng setbacJ~ rOl- tll12
lnternal" lots.
3. Modify the submittal to Include a survey of the ~ntlre PUD.
~. Specify on the master plan that the proJect shall be platted
and site plau approval is required for all lmprovement~ UGl
included with the plat and construction plans of toe reqUIred
improvements.
5. Change the name of the document from "Master Site Plan" to
"Master plan".
,
,
6. Nodify the parking data for the recreation amenitIes '[0
Identify the correct number of requIred parking spaces.
7. It is recommended that the landscaping proposed for the east,
west and south perimeter buffer easements be changed from one
tree every thirty lineal feet plus shrubs twenty four inch WIl.
center to a grouping (4 to 6) small native or moderate drought
tolerant trees (minimum height 8 feet) spaced thirty feet on
cen ter and large native (evel-gre:en) canopy tl-ees (mil11.muIU
height 8 feet) spaced Sixty feet on center plus a continuQ",
native or moder_t. droughc tolerant bed;. (minimum height ~4
inChes) spaced two foot on center. The plan view will depict
the landscape material in nleandering path rather than a
straight line.
e. Show on the master plan S.W. Congress Boulevard connecting to
Knuth Road extended~
9 .
A revised master plan, which reflects all .taft comments
conditions approved by the City Commission and Plann1ng
Development Board, slla11 be subm1 t tad in tl" 1pli,::a t.... t.o
Planning and Zoning Department, prior to initIatIng
~lattIng proces3.
and
and
th-.=
tlie
1 0 . P d r kin g spa c e.3 shall be pro v ide d on the s a 111 e lot a oS t Ii ,~
~w~lllng tc b6 S01~~d.
Page 2
Memorandum No. 95-555
Tara oaks
MPMD 95-007
11. Compliance with all applicable comments regarding conditions
of approval of the 1990 rezoning.
12. compliance with all comments regarding the city's and Palm
Beach County Traffic Division's analysis of the traffic
statement submitted by the applicant's traffic consultant.
(See Exhibit "A" - letter from Palm Beach county Tl.'affic
Division dated September 22, 1995.)
MEH:dim
,xc: Central File
a:Tara2
,
I
E X H I BIT "A"
,
,
Board of County Commissioners
Ken L. Foster, Chairman
Burt Aaronson, Vice Chairman
Karen T. Marcus
Carol A. ~oberts
Warren H. Newell
Mary McCarty
Maude Ford Lee
County Administral
I i Ii Robert Weisman
Ii; f
;, (
." ."'. ~
September 22, 1995
Ms. Tambri Heyden, Director
Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Department
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL ,33425-0310
RE: TARA OAKS
Dear Ms. Heyden:
P~r Mike Haag's request, the Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the
traffic impact study for the project entitled Tara Oaks, pursuant to the Traffic
Performance Standards in Article 7.9 of the Palm Beach County land Development
Code. The proposed project will consist of 192 multi-family residential dwelling
units and a 20,000 square foot church. The study reports this site to be
previously approved for 77 single-family dwelling ~nits. The traffic study
addresses the increase in t~tffic from the proposed project, minus the approved
project. The access points are all on Knuth Road. The build-out for the project
is 1999.
The traffic study addresses the traffic from a church only. We have been seeing
many of the larger churches are being built with day school and day care
facilities. If the project has these uses, the traffic from these uses also
needs to be addressed.
The Traffi; DiV,l.1on, hI' deterMinld thlt thl IroJlot ~..,. 'h. r.~uir.m."t. of
tha Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. If you have any
questions regarding this determination, ~lease contact me at 684-4030.
Yvonne Zie1's letter reconvnends a right turn lane on Knuth Road, at the
residential driveway, if Knuth Road is not extended to the north. While the
projected peak hour traffic volumes meet the County minimum requirements for a
right turn lane, there appears to be a flaw in the logic.
Right turn" lanes are needed to remove slower turning ' traffic from the through
traffic flow. If Knuth Road is not extended north, there is no through traffic.
The right turn lane would serve no purpose. When knuth Road is extended to the
north, the traffic would probably be oriented more to the north. There would be
a need for a left turn lans at the residential driveway. There appears to be
only a short section of Knuth Road missing north of thh project. It .lIm.
logical to make the connection to the north in conjunction with this development.
Otherwise there wil' be a missing section of roadway 1n a fully developed area.
"An EquJI Opportunity "Aifirl11.1ti\'~ ALlion Employer"
,;:!
111'\ 2122" \\'."tl',t1Il1II.'.\, il 11..li,1.1 1lllh-122'l illl:") 1,~I-llHHI
September 22, 1995
Hs. Tambri Heyden, Director
TARA OAKS
page two
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
c.\ ) I)
t..L./(V~' ,~. ~......a-~)/
Dan Weisberg, P.E.
Senior Registered Civil Engineer
cc. William Hukill, P.E., Director
Boynton Beach Department of Development
File: TPS - Hun. - Traffic Study Review
,
,
g:\user\dwe1sber\wp50\tps\boyn52
e
~
~ ~ :It
~-
. ~:; J~
~I'" ~.c~~ ~!~~
!* .... ;t ~ - v .p'
I 5: '2.. ~ ... ';/ ~. z... - ...~
. Q. .: " "I ~! c ~ ~ c " ..
t~~~~~ :" . - ; ~ x c~~ ~ ~
i "ll~p~_ ~ 30 ~I...o .. !:~ !~! !~; ~~~
~ I ---~'~I~ -.- ii:; ~ ; ~ ~ 5~ ':J"'" - ~~. !~!
,,~ ~! a - _ , ; Ii . ~~. ~~~- '" ~~~ s.v
I, I ,i '" ,.. : h~ 'I" ,'j; in
;e J ~~ ~ f ~ ~;!:~ii~-I i~i ~i~
~ ,,"~ n ~ __-- i ~ !..~i;~;;~~ i::; ~~;
~ ;~~ i~ 'i ~.~ ~ n~~ ~ . : ~ ~~~ ~~6 ~u~:i !~; h~
o i 'iie ~ ~ ~~~ ii! : ~~~'. ~ !i~I~! H~u ~~ ~iiiiU;~ ;;~ ~~.
~~.~ ~~d~~~1~" "I~ ..,~~.~.;~ -! ~;~~~h~sse'Q 6~t ~~;
l!! i ~ ;;J~~ :~~~~.~l ~I' ;i~;P ,~~r..I~! ~ 6,'~ & U i;;m ~~- ~;"
(7) ~~;~~~~ !1!:~~~!1! 11!:~~..~s::Wh '~"6~~ ~uuv'u ~!i i~~
o "".~~'" '" :;1 ~=d. :ld~.~lu h~~ !l.~ _M..~ ~~t ~~~
~ 3 r l' u l[" ..:r~ ,.!_c<In~(,
'. .~,~ _ -.e~ ~~ ~
~=
E
X H
I
B
I
T
II ell
.---- - -
---_..,.....
! .~.~~'!:. .~~ ~~- ~-I
I "".\, I" ._4", ,I "I
, t- j j~II.J" 'Ii ii'
. L:P.' _ rlf- -:
.. )~J.~tr;
. '''''lVJ >1 'Jv38 ,-.lV.:I I -' t:.
;/ I I I' I,. ~~
, ' I
I 1 1 ;-.
~ ~I~"';. ~ N- t~ '11~" .,11 l ~
.,1" ",jt."'jt.j~ L I (~ ~
~.7~~:;1
!J<"..T,-,,,,, so.:.. evu..WG '
,
. !
:. :
2. :
~St1::
:iP"! ti
~;1~~;~ 0-
, nHH
~1
(f)
(f)
W i
U f
o ~
<l.
)-
~
W
(!)
[0
~
o
~
:J
:~ ~ j
l ,
HI ! ~f
!.~
j; -
r ;.~
!'iii.r
HH
j';;
1"
;6~.
,_. .:a:
~; ~!~
11:':* ..3;....
~~7~~:
lF~jl
~.::;I~:~.
~ - {i:
.-.
h
.!
=-.
,'-
~
~
~ ~ i?
iA
~ 1 '-J
. ~ <t
{ ;; l~
~~~
~~
l,n
-'
~ ;:}
~H~
!~ ~..::-
:,'f!
~ ~
,) !--
. <II :11 ~
;:~ ~~S ~
i :!i ~ii~ I~
~ " i:!~ i.li
~ .,~ H=~ p.[
t h .f!.
~ . ~
~ ,h iI
~<~.~~'J ~.~~~~~ I~
"'-a P'>"'II'Cl~.... ~
~ ~:~~~;
. ..
c
u
S !i:
l,,~h~
~~~~f~
~~i!~~
5 ;~:
.
!
!~
~~
j~
:; i i j
_ E: t ~ '1! ) f !
.;~! ~ , ~ - Q ~.'
~ B~ i !&;, .:~ :
_ ~-i! :;~; ::~ !
..#: Ii: ~~ji !li ~
i .,1 I i--l ,'- I
8:3 I;! _f flh '~li i
a f . -, a ! i H · r.i :
of :r: - ji~; I:U;.
I' _I;! 5 l~~. lHli ,
,I jl:f 1 ~!II !I:'~ il
!i ..),. 1 !,oli'. ~ ..l
::; .. I ~;.- fd~ II 'Hf '-Ilff ~~
11 e., . t ~ . H~ E ~ S 'h t : f f.
, %l"~w~.' ~oi ",.. :Ii
, : ~ .! f'd I t f ~p Ii .- ~ ! ; " J Jr.' 01-
, r' , . ~_.. fl ll' . .
I:i'~!f i' ~,]! .f f; I '1.! H-l
I'" __ i.F' i-" i ~dJI~;;J,
, L h ~ ]"n = f ! 1 0
.. , . .. ~ it
""f
, ~['~. ,
_ ,. 0
... ._IO qJ
~g~]~
111ii I"l~ Z:L ~
: :1 \ : ~I~ 1
I II ::i 4) .
. 'I ~ ~
~f ~
11
c
c
o
.,ii:
........
- '"
0-
._ u
U " "
o .~ u
1t.c2
.. u 0-
<( ...
..: E
~ ~ 2;
00'
>- o~.
o '"
-0'0-
_ Cli')"
~ 0\0"
...J_,
!loJ
s! i 5~i
.~ .--!
li~ i~~~
'!" :~'I'
k,l. ~$)
I~j ,~.
i
I
~
t::>
~
en
~
<
o
-<
g::
-<
E-t
a ---.
E X H I BIT
IIBII
"
.-:-~
':?~~~: '.~
. . "~ ~-..- ...~
. ~ .' --"'t'''~'::':~'' ~
. ~[o
~,-~~]<r
Ci "-
00 IU
Z<O[ <i.
'" III ~ 0
i 11 i : . ~ 0 (j)
::1:: '"Ii 0 -
; I ~ I ~! !
, 'I ~ )
-, ~
~1
tJ
c
c
o
VIa:
.'-
o~
._ 0
u .. ..
o :~ 0
...cO
~ ~ a:
Od " ~
Q. '"'
00'
>'0'-
o '"
,,'O~
= CU'l
~ 0\1}
..J_
. ----i-=:--
I ; I, .:
! Hn:~ !~
,
: ~
. .
! ~
2 :;
~I
U)
U)
W
o
o
<..{
r
~
W
(!)
~
W
~
fa
f'J
d
~ "'" ~ ';: i ~
i " ~ 0;: ;; ::'
5i!~~Z
; ~! ~;H
~ i
!fJ i 11
~
~! ~
f ;^~
Tii.l
:~";
~!H
HH
;
1:" .........)
i~ ~~~
~?; ,;~"
_i ' ,I.:t,,:
~iJi:l.,
~,--t
r!l~~:
- <
.~
1,
.!
.'.4
,..
~ ~:t}
im
~ ~
III "~
e
~ 1 ~
" ~ J:
:,\.J
(~ q
"'~~
~~
CO
.
u
j ir:
l~iU~
~'~ lE' ~
i-'~ - r
~~;!;~
@ ~s?"
. m
.
~
~
~~
. ~ ~ ~!
wI S ~.: J~
~i.. . . ~~~g ~e~
~ :. " .. ~. . - ~..
. ."", I. " " ;;! ., "i :~.
I~ ~2:?~,~" ."' : ~ ~- Q~' C e
,,:;' . . .' . .. .., "". -
. .....1' ., ""1,' , . 'I'" 1" ,l, -
i. I ,I ,'!1 ;', "". ,'j "i :::>
~~ ~ ~. it' I .= . I .' ~ ~- ~~~- ~ '"~. ~ ~
., ' .' I I I .! '!~ 'l" · 'i' ""
:. .! ,I:' ' l"'i'" , I'! l;l ~
'!ili ,. ," L.J i i' :,1 !l!ij.'l I;:
.. ,,' ' " ..," I,'''!' .,.j" ,I. ."
1,1'111.11; ,I ni';' i.,in. 'ii; h'!:;!!" !ii en
i3;~~~~ .~;~~~~J 0:1_ ....i.~ ~!~~~! '~~~eh ~~~E=a e.1 ::i; --..
s g5~H i~~m;f ~1':;;i~~~:5 i .::M~r a~~~ ~'a rVfi, .~~ i~~ ....
___._'.'.; _ ~I!:'~~",:::c~{g.;~; ;~,~" S~.~H:1 ~~ :l~'. <
.. .. ' .'~, ." -.._rv. e .; ~ ""v, .~. .~o
~I ,: 0", ~ dg~,~~~ .i~~ !~~ _M.: if a ~~~
~ a~~ .!~ . f;!<~~~ 0
.<_ _.~'f~~
'.~' = .__0
<
g::
<
E-t
~~;Ji~
:r ..~G:':~~
ll~' ~~. I-
,",,,"G'C1,Q... ~
- ;~ ~
~ . AI
~ -..~
~ :;~
!
~, .
~ ,H II
~~ ~-
..~ ~
," ~~= ~
Hi~ ! j~
!:~~ ;;Ii
lr:~ J,;~
.-- :;
~
I
;-
J~
,~
!~
91
tf; 'i~j.:I
_~. - {~i ~~! --Iz
~ ~H. ~..- ., -
I . ;-i! :Ui (; E
A _ -- 0 t - ..c .. 8 -
~; f1t - _;ji !~~ \
..! . ~_ i f - J .' j E
g ~p; rIft 'ji I
~ I - j E · gl & ~ H 1> ~l' .
III! ~. .~ :r: i l~~~ ~~d!
~ B~ 1 gill ,t i"! i j _: 1: H ~.
. Ili;!l:, l! W!: 1iH: '11 H .
_/ jig ~ II H t~!. il,Hf Ill' If :i
, i",hi1ii'IPl i. ~
I '. zJ"!,'!1\f' i'5' . 'I'
: I, : ~ E f' ~ t f;P : ; fin i i 1
I I ' r '.' ~ ~-" I I -. Ii ! I l-
I : i ~ ~:f,j ~ ~~-:,~ dl I~I~ ;f1d1 9
" ~. ; ; ~.;:! t- .' i ,lji ,. ..J
, ":'.'_'j_<.t-~;! d:l<!
, i ,"" ,'" 1." Q
;(...'" ~
, I
-----~- .' 'I 'I'
,:.. II :
, ,I i j.+i:::; ; :
L~r---_...i.J"'" ,,!! I I ,,;1
" iJ.1~ ,I
,- ',----
.
~
~
h ..
:, fJ\ -"-"--.f-n-
:, ~ ..
.J." "',
i~ ; '->
it
~~
$:~(\
!F~=
. ,h', ' ~i'~
,...,...: ,~,;:: ".,., ~~~~
'" ~-":=~ ;.:~~:~J.!~ '
.
.. ,~lt .IT..'P)
......,.. ,,::> ~rg:.^1'''
11J'I; "/1 ,._~_/7 __u_
e
!
~ ,.-
.
~
: !'
(f)
8 '1'
cl " fl. ~! '1'
Z I . ! d , ~ ;,.. :i · ~~,
~ =.! I ,! hi ~;~ . ~'I'ii . ii; :i,
ci.' ill II I!!lH ' " ,," · I,
::5 .., I ! lil'rii ~ ~I-" ~ ~I i~imm;
n' I- n d. Ii. h. .!i '!J ,H.f · <l, ~sr~~p.'.
~ ," it.. '1'" c " ." . ,..,,(11
"' ." ,.., "i'" _ .' ill;;;; ,'0' ii,'" (-;
" ! It. ", " " ;; " - I '" ~ H ,:;j ,~, ,
<t I Ji' f!i I ,," -; ~! /.1; ~ I i,' ,,' _Ill. "..:!I
o :;1 pt ~,!~p ; '.- ;~~~Ei _JI ;:~ :.I..d!'"i'i~~i:
,,! ,'" - pi;!l ,;" ~
~ fi~ ~:f!!Hn~~ t~.f.;;,r;;.L,:~!h_" i~rg? '"
.. !II'"'''''''''' ""0" i"iM .....
.:,;;~.",;.~~.[L~~_,~.!. J : ~ n Hi} fT ~;'_ r rc.:j,J'; ,: !! ' w ,f! j, 1 i
__... .. .. "i! ji_ii l(~\~I:;: '? 5 ~ n:
; .l'... ~.::.
~ ~;.- f ~- ~ .:: ;
-" ,
_u
"..
ii l~;
,,'1 ~;
~. ci
1I1~! ; ~
fi ~ I.
ll;
~~
-"
.,
E X H I BIT
lie"
EXHIBIT "C"
Administrative Conditions
Project name: TARA OAKS PUD
File number: MPMD 95-007
Reference: 2 sheets crepared bv Kilday and Associates identified
as 3rd submittal with Planninq and Zoninq Deoartment November 14.
1995 date stamo markinq
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE
REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments:
1. The applicant at the above site has
requested can pickup for solid waste
disposal and recycling which could
possibly be accommodated, however the
location and accessibility for
servicing must be shown at time of
site plan submittal.
UTILITIES
Comments:
2. Plan shall show existing utilities on
or adjacent to the tract, and the
proposed points of connection to the
existing water and sewer mains, (LDR
Chapter 3, Art.IV, Sec.3(O).
3. Utility easements between or adjacent
to buildings shall be a minimum of
twenty feet (20') or twice the depth
which ever is greater and the utility
pipe shall be a minimum of ten feet
(10') from all structures, [Sec.26.
33 (b) ] .
FIRE
Comments: NONE
POLICE
Comments: NONE
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
4. Completion of Knuth Road must be
accomplished prior to issuance of
first Certificate of Occupancy for any
dwelling unit.
5. Turn lanes (Northbound right turn in
and Southbound left turn in) at Tara
Oaks entry road must be shown as part
of paving documents.
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
6. Site should be platted.
7. Plans should be in compliance with
parking signs and handicap code.
1 of 6
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
8. Plans should show established
easements and setbacks as it relates
to townhouses.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
9 . One-half credit for private recreation
provided is recommended based on the
following elements:
i. Swimming pool and deck
ii. Game court area
a. Basketball
b. Sand volleyball
iii. Meeting room
iv. Jogging trail
v. Gazebo or garden amenity
10. Recreation dedication requirement:
192 multifamily units X .015 acres =
2.88 acres
2.88 acres divided by 2 = 1. 44 acres
recreation dedication requirement.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments:
11. Submit an environmental assessment.
12. Submit a copy of Gopher tortoises
relocation - permit from Florida Game
and Fresh Water Fish Commission.
13. Submit a tree survey with Tree
Management Plan for entire site.
14. Sheet #2 of recent submittal shows the
1.7 acre "reservation" area. This
area should delineate how the existing
trees (and associated native
vegetation) will be preserved. This
area should be part of comment #13
above.
15. The sheet #2 of recent submittal shows
another tree preservation area as part
of the church parcel. This area
should be addressed in similar fashion
to comment #13 and 14 above.
16. The sheet #2 note about exotic species
of trees indicates that all other
trees will be removed with the exotic
species. The native trees not in the
preservation area(s) that can be
successfully relocated, will be part
of the Tree Management Plan relocation
efforts.
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
2 of 6
DEPARTMENTS
17. To ensure that the area within Pod 2
open space is not encroached by a
building or structure, with the
exception of the gazebo, identify on
the master plan a building setback
line following the perimeter of Pod 2.
This building setback line will
terminate at the established building
setback line along the east and west
sides of the PUD on both sides of the
existing parcel line. To further
clarify the location and setbacks for
the gazebo specify on the master plan
a 20 foot setback from the south
parcel line, 40 foot setback from the
west property line and identify the
maximum north/south and east/west
dimension of the structure.
18. Modify the submittal to include a
survey of the entire PUD and renumber
all sheets chronologically.
19. Considering that the City Commission
determined that the required parking
spaces for the townhouse units may be
located in a parking lot rather than
the required two (2) spaces being
provided on each townhouse loti the
project is required to comply with the
"Particular Requirements" specified in
Article II - Landscape Code, Chapter
7.5 of the City's Land Development
Regulations. Place a note on the
landscape plan indicating that the
project is subject to compliance with
Article II - Landscape Code, Chapter
7.5 of the City's Land Development
Regulations.
20. Submit previous sheet 4 of 4 (buffer
wall and landscaping required north of
L.W.D.D. Canal L-25) and renumber all
sheets chronologically.
21. Modify the parking data for the
recreation amenities to identify the
correct number of required parking
spaces consistent with the Section 11.
16. e. ( 1), ( 4 ) and ( 12 ) ( d) and ( e )
of Chapter 2 - Zoning.
22. Recalculate the size and area of the
basketball court. Correct the data
including the number of required
parking spaces.
23. Show on the master plan the location
of the established setbacks specified
on the plan for the east and west
sides of Pod 3.
3 of 6
INCLUDE
REJECT
DEPARTMENTS
24. To show consistency in identifying the
east and west setbacks for the
recreation amenities change the
setback note identified on the west
side of the recreation area from 25
feet to 31 feet. Thirty-one (31) feet
will match the setback specified on
the plan for the east side of the
recreation area. To clarify the
setbacks for the recreation amenities
place a note on the master plan
indicating that the 31 foot east/west
setback is for all recreation
amenities except for buildings which
shall follow the perimeter setbacks.
25. To be consistent with the data
indicated in the analysis of the
traffic report prepared by Palm Beach
County Traffic Division specify on the
master plan 20,000 square feet for the
area of the church located in Pod 3.
26. Modify the Knuth Road right-of-way to
show compliance with the traffic
analysis made by Palm Beach County
Traffic Division and the City Engineer
as follows:
i. Southbound left turn lane on
Knuth Road into the project;
ii. Southbound left turn lane on
Knuth Road at the intersection of
Knuth Road and Woolbright Road;
and
iii. Northbound right turn lane on
Knuth Road into the project.
27. Since platting does not require any
review by the Planning and Development
Board, and the City Commission review
does not occur until the end, no
opportunity is available for the
Commission to set land value for the
purpose of calculating the recreation
fee. Therefore, since this request
involves additional fees to be paid
and since the property is under
contract to purchase, it is
recommended the land value be set
using the purchase price at the time
of the most recent sale of the PUD
property. This will require the
applicant to submit a copy of their
purchase contract concurrent with plat
submittal.
28. Revised unified control documents
shall be submitted to reflect the
change from rental apartments to fee
simple townhouse units.
4 of 6
INCLUDE
REJECT
DEPARTMENTS
29. Submission of a rectified master plan
showing compliance with the conditions
of approval for the project will be
required to be submitted to the
Planning and Zoning Department in
triplicate prior to platting and/or
site plan review of the project.
30. Payment of fees for third review is
required at time of submittal of
rectified,master plan.
31. Please note: a separate site plan
review will be required for the block
wall and landscape screening required
adjacent to the project and located
north of L.W.D.D. Canal L-25.
32. Do to the close proximity of the
basketball court to the on-site and
off-site residential units, it is
recommended that a note be placed on
the master plan indicating that the
basketball court will not be
illuminated. To lessen the adverse
impact of the use of the basketball
court to the off-site residential
units it is also recommended that nine
(9) gallon evergreen shrub material,
spaced five (5) feet on-center be
installed along the east property line
to a distance of 20 feet north and
south of the length of the basketball
court.
33. To show compliance with the vehicle
use area screening requirements of the,
landscape code and provide a
vegetative perimeter buffer the
following landscape improvements are
recommended for the east and west
sides of the residential project
(note: the landscaping required along
the north property line of the project
is subject to the Tara Oaks PUD
property owner and adjacent property
owner's association agreement. The
plans shall describe and show the
landscape buffer consistent with the
specifications identified in the
agreement) :
i. omit the landscape buffer
easement along the north, east
and west perimeter of the
residential project - (the
landscape code will require
landscape material to be
installed throughout the pervious
common ground open space area,
therefore, the perimeter
landscape buffer easements are
not needed) .
5 of 6
INCLUDE
REJECT
, DEPARTMENTS
ii. change the proposed perimeter
buffer landscaping by omitting
the grouping of three (3) small
canopy trees and two (2) large
canopy trees every fifty foot on
center and replace by showing and
describing a grouping (3 or 4) of
small native and moderate drought
tolerant trees (minimum height
eight (8) feet) spaced forty (40)
feet on center and in every other
grouping remove a small tree and
replace with a large canopy
native (evergreen) tree (minimum
height 8 feet). The recommended
trees shall be installed within
the pervious common ground open
space area located along the east
and west perimeter of the
residential project. The
proposed continuous native or
drought tolerant hedge (minimum
height 18 inches) spaced two (2)
feet on-center located along the
east and west perimeter is
acceptable. However, the
continuous hedge shall be
extended along south edge of the
recreation facility. Please note
that a minimum of one/half of the
total number of trees and hedges
required to meet the landscape
code specifications shall be a
native specie. Place a note on
the landscape plan indicating the,
50% native specie requirement for
required trees and hedges.
iii. Return to the landscape plan the
landscaping and landscape buffers
that were shown on the previous
approved master plan in the area
south of the existing parcel
line that separates the
residential property from the
church property.
MEH/dim
a:ComDepts.TAR/p&d
6 of 6
INCLUDE
REJECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-541
Agenda Memorandum for
October 2, 1995 city Commission Meeting
THRU:
Carrie Parker
ci ty Manager .~ I~
Tambri J. HeYd~~R
planning and Zoning Director
TO:
FROM:
Michael E. Haag
Zoning and Site Administrator
DATE:
September 26, 1995
SUBJECT: Tara Oaks PUD MPMD 95-007 (change in access,
recreation, unit type and use acreage)
NATURE OF REOUEST
Kilday and Associates, agent for pulte Home Corporation, contract
purchaser of property owned by Bill Winchester is requesting to
modify the Tara Oaks PUD master plan. The 20.16 acre proj ect
previously planned for 192 multi-family apartment units, 20,000
square foot (650 seat) church and open space area is zoned PUD and
located at the northeast corner of Woolbright Road and Knuth Road
extended (see Exhibit "A" - location map). The requested changes
are limited to the north 14.470 acres of the PUD and are as
follows: (see Exhibit "BIl - letter of request and proposed master
plan) :
1. Omit the extension of S.W. Congress Boulevard to Knuth
Road.
2. Reduce the number of access points into the project from
two (2) to one (1).
3. Increase in the size of Pod 1 (residential tract) by
incorporating .6 acres resulting from the elimination of
S. W. CongresA Boulevard right-of-way. A new property
line which subdivides Pod 2 (open space) therefore
creating a project that consists of 5.69 acres for church
with open space and 14.7 acres townhouse project with
open space.
4. Change the type of units from 192 multi-family apartments
to 23, two-story buildings with a total of 192 townhoua.
units. Establish the following building and site
regulations for the townhouse units:
Building setbacks (individual lots); front 10 feet,
rear 15 feet, side (end unit) 3 feet, side
(interior unit) 0 feet. Note minimum building
separation is 15 feet.
Pool setbacks; pools not allowed.
Screen enclosure setbacks; shall comply with
building setbacks.
Minimum living area - 750 square filet (proposed.
unit sizes - 913 square feet, 1,079 square feet and
1,082 square feet)
Building height - Remains as originally approved
(30 feet, two stories)
Page 2
Agenda Memorandum for
October 2, 1995 city Commission Meeting
Tara Oaks PUD
MPMD 95-007
Lot area - 1,260 square feet (end unit) and 1,050
square feet (interior unit)
Perimeter setbacks: Increase the north setback from
20 feet to 40 feet. Please note the following
setbacks remain as previously approved; 40 foot
front (west Knuth Road), 40 foot rear (east) and 20
foot side (south). Also note the perimeter
setbacks take precedence over bUilding setbacks for
individual lots.
5. Change the type and location of private recreation
amenities from a clubhouse, pool, jogging trail, picnic
area and fishing dock to pool, cabana (restrooms for
pool), sand volley ball court, jogging trail and gazebo
or garden amenity. The current and proposed location of
the recreation amenities are shown on Exhibit "C" and
Exhibit liB" respectively.
6. Establish a 25 foot wide landscape buffer along the north
property, 15 foot wide buffer along the east property
line and 10 foot wide buffer along the west (Knuth Road)
property line of the project. Pod 2 an open space and
detention area border the south property of the
residential tract.
BACKGROUND
On June 21, 1988, the City Commission approved a master plan and
rezoning of the Tara Oaks PUD property from R1AAA (single-family
residential) to PUD with a land use intensity (LUI) of 4.00 for 78
Single-family, detached units.
On December 18, 1990, after review by the Department of Community
of Affairs (DCA) and with objections, the City Commission approved
ordinances for a land use element amendment that changed the land
use classification of the property from Low Density Residential to
Medium Density Resident~al and rezoning of the property from PUD
(LUI:4) to PUD (LUI:5) with a master plan for 192 mUlti-family
uni ts, private recreation and a 20,000 square foot church (see
Exhibi t "c" - current master plan). The adopted comprehensive plan
amendment was transmitted to DCA on December 19, 1990, along with
responses to DCA's objections. In February 1991, the DCA issued a
notice of intent to find the comprehensive plan amendment in
compliance.
The 1990 applications were submitted under Palm Beach County's
current traffic performance standards ordinance, however prior to
the effective date of the City's concurrency management ordinance.
Therefore, concurrency certification for traffic and concurrency
exemption for drainage and neighborhood parks were granted with the
1990 approval.
On June 2, 1992, the City Commission approved a request to allow
construction of the south portion (adjacent to the church parcel)
of ~nuth Road, prior to preliminary plat approval of the property.
The reason for submitting the request was to ensure the Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints' purchase of the church parcel
within the PUD, which took place on June 26, 1992.
On June 16, 1992, the City Commission granted a one (1) year time
extension that extended the project's June 18, 1992 expiration date
to June 17, 1993. No application for extensions was made since the
June 1993 expiration, until a retroactive extension which was filed
Page 3
Agenda Memorandum for
October 2, 1995 city Commission Meeting
Tara Oaks pun
MPMD 95-007
in November 1994; a period of one year and five months.
On April 8, 1993, the city Commission approved a master plan
modification for the Tara Oaks PUD to amend the condition of
approval which required the construction of Knuth Road to be tied
entirely to the Tara Oaks PUD. The approval of the master plan
modification allowed the construction responsibility for Knuth Road
to be shared by the Knuth Road PCD.
On April 18, 1995 the City Commission approved the retroactive time
extension submitted November 1994. The approval granted nine
months to file a plat application. The approval was also
conditioned upon the applicant evaluating reducing density at time
of the applicant's next submittal (subject request).
Chapter 2.5, Planned Unit Developments, of
development regulations states that changes
developments shall be processed as follows:
the
in
City's
planned
land
unit
Section 12. Changes in plans.
"Changes in plans approved as a part of the zoning to PUD may
be permitted by the Planning and Zoning Board upon application
filed by the developer or his successors in interest, prior to
the expiration of the PUD classification, but only [after] a
finding that any such change or changes are in accord with all
regulations in effect when the change or changes are requested
and the intent and purpose of the comprehensive plan in effect
at the time of the proposed change. Substantial changes shall
be proposed as for a new application of PUD zoning. The
determination of what constitutes a substantial change shall
be within the sole discretion of the city Commission. Non-
substantial changes as determined by the city Commission in
plans shall not extend the expiration of the eighteen month
approval for the PUD classification."
ANALYSIS
,
Staff has reviewed this request for consistency with the PUD
development standards, and the intent and purpose of planned unit
developments as stated in the following sections of Chapter 2.5 of
the City's land development regulations:
Section 1. Intent and purpose.
"A Planned Unit Development District (PUD) is established. It
is intended that this district be utilized to promote
efficient and economical land use, improved amenities,
appropriate and harmonious variety in physical development
creative design, improved living environment, orderly and
economical development in the City, and the protection of
adj acent and existing and future City development. The
district is suitable for development, redevelopment and
conservation of land, water and other resources of the City.
~. Regulations for Planned Unit Developments are intended to
accomplish the purposes of zoning, subdivision regulations and
other applicable City regulations to the same degree that they
are intended to control development on a lot-by-lot basis. In
view of the substantial public advantages of planned unit
development, it is the intent of PUD regulations to promote
and encourage development in this form where tracts suitable
in size, location and character for the uses and structures
proposed are to be planned and developed as unified and
Page 4
Agenda Memorandum for
october 2, 1995 city Commission Meeting
Tara Oaks PUD
MPMD 95-007
coordinated units.
B.
Section 9. Internal PUD standards.
INTERNAL LOTS AND FRONTAGE. Wi thin the boundaries of the
PUD, no minimum lot size or minimum yards shall be
required; provided, however, that PUD frontage on
dedicated public roads shall observe front yard
requirements in accordance with the zoning district the
PUD use most closely resembles and that peripheral yards
abutting other zoning districts shall be the same as
required in the abutting zone."
The following evaluates the significant issue relating t.o the
proposed changes:
1. Omission of the S.W. congress Boulevard connection to Knuth
Road extended - This change will cause a redistribution of
traffic from the original approved road network. The Police
Department Memorandum No. 0168 indicates that the response
time for emergency vehicles to the subject property as well as
the Clipper Cove and Lakes of Tara development would be
greatly increased if the road connection was constructed.
The Lakes of Tara Homeowners Association has indicated that
they are not in favor of extending S. W. Congress Boulevard to
Knuth Road extended (see Exhibit "0" - letter dated August 29,
1995 from Lakes of Tara Homeowners Association). The
association has also requested some minor improvements to this
area that are normally paid by an applicant as part of
abandonment.
From evaluating the plan, it appears that the change in unit
type from apartments to townhouses and the desire to retain
the 192 units from the approved master plan, as well as offer
a privatized community, has driven the elimination of the S.W.
Congress Boulevard extension. The reason for this is that
because of stacking and clustering of units, apartments
(previous master plan) more efficiently use land; yielding a
higher number of units per acre. Uni t types (such as
townhouses) that only cluster units and not stack, require
more land area to yield the same amount of density, even when
both unit types are limited to two stories.
The argument often made of not wanting to extend an existing
road to a new project because of traffic and division of
residential tracts is not applicable to this project since
even with the previous master plan the project's residential
area was consolidated to one side (north) of S.W. Congress
Boulevard. Furthermore, the only traffic that will use S.W.
Congress Boulevard is the traffic generated by this project;
reason being the existence of Quail Ridge to the west and
therefore, the lack of further extension of s. W. Congress
Boulevard west of Knuth Road.
.. This issue of connectivity of roads to the existing road
network has been raised frequently over the past five years
due to increased popularity of privatized communities which
stems from increased crime or the perception of increased
crime. Rarely do applicants and homeowners understand that
with privatization, quality of public services (response to
fire, police, utility emergencies and evacuations) decreases,
not only to their development, but to surrounding existing and
future developments that benefit from the safety and
Page 5
Agenda Memorandum for
October 2/ 1995 city Commission Meeting
Tara Oaks PUD
MPMD 95-007
convenience of an improved, integrated road network within
their city or county.
In their memorandum the Police Department notes the benefit to
multiple communities when roads are extended. The pre-planned
extension of the existing dead-end of S.W. Congress Boulevard
was to provide quicker response by police units in the western
area of the city to the houses in the western areas of Lakes
of Tara which at this time only have access from Congress
Avenue. This gives the Police Department the option of
sending a police unit from the east or west, or both if
needed, to best handle an emergency in either the Lakes of
Tara or Tara Oaks developments.
2. Reduction of the number of access points into the project from
two (2) to one (1) - Implementing this change would result in
the need for emergency access point (s) . As indicated in
Police Department Memorandum No. 0168/ they have provided
emergency access pOints along Knuth Road, however, the "Knox
Box" type of entry is not acceptable to the Police Department.
It should be noted that access points restricted to emergency
vehicles, rather than providing a full access are less than
desirable and can reduce quality of emergency service too.
With the increased popularity of privatized communities the
fewer the access points, the lesser the cost to the developer
and homeowners to secure their access points with guardhouses,
or the less expensive method of automatic gates. Both Police
and Fire have been accepting these alternative types of
access, provided the type of gate opening mechanism is agreed
upon, realizing that over time, the availability of these
emergency access points can be forgotten about and never used.
3.' Increase in the size of Pod 1 (residential tract) by
incorporating the .6 acres of the proposed elimination of S.W.
Congress Boulevard and the subdivision of Pod 2 - These
proposed changes are acceptable with the condition that the
subdivision of Pod 2 does not decrease the total area of Pod
2 below the origirtally approved 3.5 acres and that on the
master plan the acreage breakdown for each parcel/property be
delineated. As was noted previously in issue 1 above, this
increase in Pod 1 size is driven by the omission of the road
extension and the desire to retain the full 192 units.
4. Change the type of units from 192 multi-family apartments to
23/ two-story bUildings with a total of 192 townhouse units _
All building and site regulations are acceptable with the
exception of the location of the parking spaces and the size
of the lots. The lots shall be extended to include no less
than two (2) parking spaces on each lot. Find attached
Exhibit "E" - Townhouse Chart, which is a comparison of;
building / pool and screen enclosure setbacks, location of
parking spaces, floor area and lot area of the site subject
r7quest an~ three other PUD townhouse projects approved by the
Cl.ty Comml.ssion. The applicant is proposing the minimum
number of parking spaces of two per unit, but does not include
~ them within the boundaries of the lot of the unit. The zoning
code requires that "parking spaces for all dwellings shall be
located on the same lot as the dwelling to be served". No
other "true" townhouse project in the city, even in a PUD,
which generally allows flexibility with regard to bUilding and
site regulations, in exchange for greater open space, exists
wi~ho':lt pa~king provided within the lot boundaries. The
bU1.~d1.ng D1. vision has indicated that the city IS security
ord1.nance would not allow parking spaces to be numbered (in an
Page 6
Agenda Memorandum for
October 2, 1995 city Commission Meeting
Tara Oaks PUD
MPMD 95-007
attempt to assign spaces to units). The reason for this is so
that it cannot be readily determined whether a homeowner is
home or not. There is much less of a chance of someone else
parking in "your" parking spaces if they are located
immediately next to your unit and on your property than if the
spaces where located on common areas.
5. Change the type and location of the recreation amenities from:
clubhouse, pool, jogging trail, picnic area and fishing dock
to pool, cabana (restrooms for pool), sand volley ball court,
jogging trail and gazebo or garden amenity - With respect to
the proposed changes in the location of the amenities, staff
is in agreement with the proposed locations. However as
indicated in the Recreation & Parks Memorandum No. 95-424, the
cabana is not acceptable as a recreation amenity that would
allow the applicant to receive one half credit towards
required recreation fees (one half credit applies to projects
that provide five (5) recreation amenities). Based on 192
dwelling units the full recreation impact fee associated with
the land value of 2.88 acres is required at the time of final
plat. The Recreation & Parks Department strongly recommends
that the applicant provide a clubhouse bUilding which would
allow the applicant to receive one half credit for providing
five (5) recreation amenities. Providing a clubhouse or
recreation bUilding is consistent with the development of
other cluster housing projects in the City.
6. Establish a 25 foot wide landscape buffer along the north
property, 15 foot wide along the east property line and 10
foot wide along west (Knuth Road) property line of the project
- The proposed landscape buffer areas are acceptable to staff
with the condition that the buffer area along the east and
west property lines be enhanced to include groupings of trees
(4 to 6 trees) with a spacing between groupings not to exceed
thirty (30) feet rather than one tree every thirty feet. The
spacing and size of the shrub material identified is
acceptable.
,
RECOMMENDATION
On Tuesday, September 12, 1995, the Technical Review Committee
(TRC) met to review the master plan modification request. The
Board recommends that the City Commission make a finding of no
substantial change for the proposed modification, and that the
Planning and Development Board approve the request, subject to the
staff exceptions listed above and the attached staff comments
Exhibit "F" - Police Department Memorandum No. 0168 and 0174,
Recreation & Parks Department Memorandum No. 95-424, Public Works
Memorandum No. 95-165, Engineering Division Memorandum Nos. 95-371,
95-349 and 95-304, BUilding division Memorandum No. 95-348 and 95-
299, Fire Prevention Memorandum No. 95-346 woe and Planning and
Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-555. It should be noted
however that if the Commission concurs with staff regarding the
issues of the extension of s.W. congress Boulevard and containing
parking wi thin the lot boundaries, the master plan would have to be
revised. These revisions most likely will Significantly alter the
master plan.
MEH:dim
xc: Central File
&,CCAlI_nrJ&.".r.
E X H I BIT nAn
LOCATION MAP
TARA OAKS
~ ::~..., : U.~T-'~~ -~.~'~
~=rI'~'" - .........' 3 Ie'. J'" "u I 'pee I ~ ~.... 1'1,
, C .3 , vv' (.
.AMAL _. . pL_l'," 4 '" ,W" MOt. IroN . -#~ACIj, '\n~2. ~'tl
' , 'I I,il ,p :=J~ ' ~:o
! Ii 'P:. f I ,... . ./4i!!.\fL ' ! w: 'T I'L ~,
C I "5'il,... u. Lf:=:3, ~".'....:/ i 1 '1 lJ
1\.,'... ,I '~~_c 1.t::,~_j!"IT ;~_'E:-,_ · T NIC -' .. ~ .': ~r~l :;.~it::"";~~
~ .~. '11~ ~~. ~. :"'j 1-1 ~ ~':11 CO":") u~.~iS'~J'< ;~\\~
7"
- ). ~ Lfm'- I ~ . ....
"-- 0 ~:; \': .... 11 ~:3; , I i ...-I :. ::J~:}ffll'l
, ~:._--..: : ::- J i{ /~! . .." · '..~~ ;. -~1 '
V 'lLLL.... I '. r"... .~......;" -.... h ... .
'---:'::";0-.,,1.. ..,.l ...::i :~~-- v.;;[]' ,__ ~ . )c____ I j I J l- \-;1 M. . ';;~~!"
./' ~ ...........:.:.: ---l 'f"" .. ,:\~.x ~~,:,
' \\~ Ittf r~~ r-nt~~~ JU1 ~.j ; - ~ ~ \\\ %~) " .'
\\\(~ titr LL~JJ,III~' u LJI ,..... c_ I I'" J f)\\\~/.d ~"/'" ',..
) ~~ ( - .i\\:;\ii r~S1~' ]!J1:.iT \. \\I ~ .~7~:,JI(_~ ,./<:~~;d.<: ~~::>
j~ ...m.. lJ.~ M, " 'J lU ~ .. ~.. .._~~';\ "/ ~ ~ . '.,., < #' ,
:~.. ~J \:\\\\;;\\i\i\\i;!~ .(i:: :...~. l~-,\..~. 'V'l -) = . ..~. 7' ".>~:~~~ /~7 /7>r^~, >\ "\\~"'" \,
...... ~j r - ~. . / t,.J~.'~fo;':->"" ..:.': ~::, )/ \\\ "
: ?~\t~,~\~ -~ (~----~- '~';/ ) TTT'\~\o' "oD ,.'"';::: ", u (., \ \~',
t ::::::::::::;:;:~ 1=-.:----... ~-___ _-,__.'1('~ " ,;'111\ \\ 'It ,,"'\ ~,R3:; t-r...., \\'r'
j" ~ :r~j_, ~AA, 'lJf2~: :{jH~;ri" : ~ ~ .... . .;\ 'J"JT "':~~""'i r:r ';:~\l'"
r/ \':\\ ;a"'HD':'i'.:, ~-:J__ ~.F'-.V j . r"t ~c JI.,,;:j:
(JI/ 1 : ::::;:::;:::::::l"~~, ES D~ I..... l.../~f&--- : r . -r T .~. /~ ~I
'/ : ~. ttt:tJW<D1Jf~~D: '0 . - II.- ,'" '11
l\:; :::::.:::::~;:' ~".( '>, ,<' , oj DV~~ - 1-:, ~ , i," ~ - 'r - : -- If I : /!
/- 't\,~ .::~~::~:::::: '~~\~- ~' ti= ..
- -------.) .:::::~~::::::. '" -LJJJ -, , 'FIT\ YI J J J I '> . ," TT, "---. . .-J f
-- .:::;:;:;:;:;:; ~,..., ,. ...' "".. -. . I ~1 1- R' '~ 1I,Il,I
.:~.- ~~, :::.=?] ~,. ...., ~ Jll
P
rs IV /.5 ".-. 4'1/ck</t W()(,..8R,GNT!?()II
..-- CI:;J '--~
~~>) G u! " ~~ 1/~xi'DI' ~J.
~.. /~-~ r[.~~...;m... .. - ~ _ ." .,J, 'III I ~~~1~
j/~ \\; t1)~'" ....: >-. ~~/",_,~'"A~~S~,~~~~",<:
~=I, \L"";~ / I X>.J,,' ~ ,
~ 'r ") :..,~ I ~tK" = ~ '-!L ~:& :;: c' k~ <~::'\'
~ L ./ n ri,;t,-..-d/ ..~:.. ; ~ ~ #~::,~~\ \\
/ -----Q 03'.:";~-i-Yf~:: @ C1 HI I~ HI !ll:
"1" \ \ \ II \ : _ _. I ,.p
r, R 3 ~ ~ u , -- + - '~I-.. t- 1--, 1 I
:-t r 1 I TTTI~i7 ~l~" \c n ~'-J~'
j /II I 1D r ""\ I -n "..... 'ITTiTiTTm:;~
. :"" '\. I --f ~ r~.Pri. .. .. ~ r
'.., = 't C;)' ." ~ J'. ~h ".ft . .. ..
C: ,J~ 1.r:I ' ....~ t ~:o 1/8 MILES1/, ~"?
~;,~~ : ~ III~' IIII 'I. ',I,:
.,.. --.Y .8"- i I- - ~o .400. '800 FEE;T -
t~ ;' - -')?Efo'~; ,,'" """ lH~LLLU~"';;;71 ,~: ::-9;" J.
~1ifuriiTI
JT1T ~
'\ ~,~
E X H I BIT "B"
P"l
, !
'/"<: t.
/,.~ ~,
~(
Kilday & ANoc18t..
Landscape Architectsl Planner.
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(4071 689-5522 · Fax: (407) 689-2592
August 31, 1995
Ms. Tambri Heyden, Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach Planning & Zoning Department
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: Tara Oaks PUD
Minor Master Plan Modification
Our File No. 738.2
Dear Ms. Heyden,
Please accept and process the attached revised information for a Minor Master Plan Modification
to the previously approved Tara Oaks PUD, located north of Woolbright Road and east of the
future Knuth Road. We are submitting this revised Minor Master Plan Modification application
on behalf of Pulte Homes Corporation South Florida Division contract purchasers of the property
and Bill Winchester, owner of the property, and incorporating comments received at the August
15, 1995 TRC Meeting.
The latest Master Plan approved on June 8, 1990 reflected a total of 192 multi-family units on the
northern portion of the site, an open space/preservation area centrally located, and a church
parcel on the southern portion of this site. The proposed Master Plan retains the 192 previously
approved units which will now be developed as fee simple town homes. The open
space/preservation tract remains centrally located, and the church parcel remains unchanged on
the southern portion of the site. Attached with this application is a revised Master Site Plan for
the project reflecting proposed building locations and corresponding lot lines, access points, the
recreation area and parking configurations. The Conceptual Landscape Plan specifies proposed
landscape buffers and plant material requirements. A previously approved cross section is also
included with the submittal set. This cross section has been revised to reflect an agreement
made between the Stonehaven Home Owners Association and the property owner The
conceptual engineering plans, as well as a boundary and tree survey, are also attached.
The perimeter landscape buffer and the building setbacks proposed are consistent with those
previously approved. Minor adjustments have been made to the main access for the PUD. The
church parcel, which is under separate ownership, will retain the two previously approved-a,ccess
points. The previously approved plan reflected two main access points to the residential ~rcel.
This has been reduced to one main access point which will be controlled with a security late.
Three emergency access locations are proposed elsewhere along Knuth Road. These access
Ms. Tambri Heyden
August 31, 1995
Page 2
points will be stabilized to support the weight of emergency vehicles. They also will be gated
and locked pursuant to the City of Boynton Beach Fire Rescue requirements. The developer of
Tara Oaks will be constructing Knuth Road from just north of the L-25 Canal south to Woolbright
Road including the required crossings over both the L-25 and L-26 Canals. Concurrent with this
roadway construction, an eight foot wide bike path will also be constructed on the east side of
Knuth Road adjacent to Tara Oaks PUD.
A private recreation site of 1.75 acres is provided for Tara Oaks PUD. The active portion of the
recreation area is provided adjacent to the main entry. This recreation area has been relocated
from the site shown on the previously approved Master Plan to address conditions imposed on
the original approval. A passive recreation component consistent with that previously approved
is shown in the open space tract and will consist of a jogging trail through the
preservation/relocation area and a gazebo or garden amenity at its terminus. A total of five (5)
recreational amenities are proposed to receive one half credit for the public recreation land
dedication. Consistent with the past approval and the comments again included in Parks and
Recreation Memorandum #90-229, the developer will pay a fee in lieu of land dedication for the
public park commitment.
The attached plans have been revised addressing those issues raised at the TRC meeting of
August 15, 1995, and subsequent items included in the TRC comment memorandums issued by
each reviewing department. The following is a recap of the comments included in the
memorandums and subsequent responses by the project team.
POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 0158
1. The final approved Master Plan depicted Southwest Congress Boulevard to be terminated
into a cul-de-sac per the request of adjacent residents. The proposed plan shows the
western right-of-way stub of Southwest Congress Boulevard to be removed.
2. The developer is investigating the feasibility of providing 24 hour access through the
automatic gate entrance system. A telephone access system or a similar feature will be
provided.
RECREATION AND PARK MEMORANDUM NO. 95-371
1. Attached is a statement from our environmental consultant stating that the permit from the
Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission will not change the Master Plan as
shown in order to comply with the requirements of the permit.
2. A Tree Management Plan and an Environmental Assessment are forthcoming. In the
attached statement from the environmental consultant, there is reference to the Tree
Management Plan and the Flora and Fauna Survey.
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-255
1. The revised Conceptual Engineering Plan shows water and sanitary sewer being provided
to Pod 3.
Ms. Tambri Heyden
August 31, 1995
Page 3
2. The project engineer Is aware of the comments and will Incorporate them in their final
plans.
3. The revised Conceptual Engineering Plan showing a connection to the existing 10. water
main on Southwest Congress Boulevard.
BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-299
1. It is the intent of the developer to plat this project.
2. There is an adequate number of parking spaces for each town house. These parking
tracts will be dedicated as either easements or common parking and access tracts.
3. The recreation building will be constructed along with the construction of the first town
house building.
4. The final Site Plan will comply with parking signs and handicap code. A complete Site
Plan application will be processed following Minor Master Plan approval.
5. The final Site Plan will show the established easements and setbacks as they relate to the
town houses. A complete Site Plan application will be processed following Minor Master
Plan approval.
FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-325
1. The approved Master Plan depicts Southwest Congress Boulevard terminating Into a cul-
de-sac per the request of the adjacent residents. It Is the Intent of the developer to have
the western right-of-way stub removed.
2. The attached Master Site Plan has been revised to allow for turn-around areas with a
radius large enough to accomodate a fire truck.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-304
A. The U.S. Postal service will be contacted to verify which roads will require naming, these
names will be incorporated into the Site Plan application following approval of the Minor
Master Plan application.
B. The traffic impact statement will be revised to reflect the redistribution of traffic pursuant
to the removal of the Southwest Congress Boulevard connection to Knuth Road.
C. The Master Site Plan has been revised to show sidewalks on both sides of the internal
roadways. The sidewalks will be in compliance with Chapter VI, Article III, Section 11 A,
Page 3 through 6 of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances.
D. Deed restrictions will be established to provide for a property owners association to pay
for the operation of a street light system within the development at the time of plat
approval.
-- - --_.._-_.__.-....~---_.,.,'_..,--------~._------~_._---_..~------,----------_._-----~------~---'_.._-_._--,.----_._--~--_."'----
Ms. Tambri Heyden
August 31, 1995
Page 4
E. The engineer for this project has certified that the drainage plan will comply with all City
codes and standards and a copy of this letter has been attached for your review.
F - H. The engineer is aware of the comments and will incorporate them into the final
engineering plans.
I. The eastern 25' of the 80' right-of-way has been dedicated. This dedication has been
recorded in O.A.B. 7324, Page 1162.
J. Acceptance from South Florida Water Management District and Lake Worth Drainage
District will be required prior to final engineering approval.
K. A permit will be obtained prior to working within the right-of-way per Chapter 22, Article
2, Section 7 (A), Page 22-3.
L. In lieu of providing sidewalks on both sides of Knuth Road, the developer has agreed to
install an 8' wide bicycle 1 pedestrian path along the east side of the road.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-145
1. The Site Plan has been revised to accomodate sanitation vehicles. As per our meeting
with Mr. Robert Eichorst. the garbage collection areas will be located at the time of final
site plan approval.
RECREATION AND PARKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-379
1. The recreation dedication requirement calculation has been shown on the Master Plan
(page 10f 4).
2. The five recreational elements consisting of a swimming pool, a sand volleyball court,
jogging trail, gazebo 1 garden amenity, and cabana have been shown on the Master Site
Plan and Master Plan. The appropriate parking spaces have also been shown along with
the required handicap spaces. It is the intent of the developer to utilize the cabana as
one of the five amenities, but no meeting area is proposed. An alternative amenity will
be provided if this is not acceptable.
3. It is the intent of the developer to provide a cabana as one of the five amenities, but no
meeting area is proposed. If this is not acceptable an alternative will be provided.
4. The developer agrees to construct the jogging trail with asphalt or another permanent
surface to minimize maintenance. The revised Master Site Plan shows the jogging trail
(1320 linear feet (1/4 mile) in length).
5. Details for private recreation equipment will be provided during the Site Plan Review
Process.
6. Parking spaces will be provided for the two recreational elements in the southern portion
of the P,U.D. These spaces will be noted on the final site plan.
Ms. Tambri Heyden
August 31, 1995
Page 5
7. It is the intent of the developer to construct a detention area leaving the rest of the open
space pod in its natural state thus maintaining its natural characteristics. If a lake was
constructed in the open space area, the number of preserved trees would decrease.
8. The preservation area will remain in the southern portion of the property.
If you have any questions or concerns in regard to this application, or if you need any additional
information, please do not hesitate to contact either Marcie Tinsley in this office or myself. Thank
you in advance for your past time and future consideration for this project.
Sincerely,
Co~\~wcJkv
Kilday & Associates, Inc.
Enclosures
cc: Susan Prillaman, Pulte Home Corporation South Florida Division
Yvonne Ziel, Traffic Consultant
Jim Drotos, Shaw, Drotos
,5~~
Received sf
P&~/96
Date
CW/jb/heyden.831
,...... " A SHAH
-. -- ---
~ - -.-
~DROTOS
Engineering
Surveying
Planning
&ASSOCIATES
4901 N,W, 17th Way
Suite 404
FI,lauderdale. Fl33309
PH: (954) 776-7604
FAX: (954) 776- 7608
August 30, 1995
City of Boynton Beach
Engineering Department
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
Attn: Mr. William Hukill, P.E.
City Engineer
Re: Tara Oaks
SDA Project No. 95-0261
Dear Mr. Hukill:
The master plan is in compliance with all City codes and standards, Chapter 6, Article IV,
Section SA, pg. 6-7 and Chapter 23, Article IIF, pg. 23-8 of the Boynton Beach Code of
Ordinances for the master plan requirements,
If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesistate to contact me.
Yours truly,
SHAH, DROTOS & ASSOCIATES
~h
d~C/
ames F. Drotos, P.E.
Florida Registration No. 35505
JFD:laf
L015.004
--------~_..-----.~-.. ---"--~-'-~------._...._--~-----,-~-_..___...._~__._.____.___...___...__'__"n'.._'___..
" . "
, ,- j
- --
~ '~H~ :
t"'~i,~ tG';
.. ~:- ~ a:'.
~ J! ~ I!
, ~
- .......
~ ::>":"0
, , 1 , 1 _I I . , z
"1Ioi';~~'!:"!"'.~EI. ;.
"'~~";iI~~.I'~!!1 !~
~~:'iii~;~ilJI&& '"
I~Pli:;!l~;~li~
i~~ .BJistit.;
1l'C~ :d.. I~"$~
~.:~ .. o-=:....,i~..
;I!~ ~i;~!Wif.t
;~~ O:<'~~~~~7;S,
~",. Ill.:<l ",..,Ii
;l!l~ J"'I ~ ~~~
~,.~ ~~' ~ ~~
:o'ih Qr;i ~ ~:.
~" ~~. ~ ,.
!... :>..'"' ~ =:
1:. ~~ Z
,- .'7 , lS
~= .~} f-
:II ! I "
l! 3
. -:' .-~...>
1:":":111"'0;:'"
--.. _1.. A' olio
~/,111//
, I
~ l~
; -..
~ ~~
!:
, I I Ii ;.
,...- t-3
::"'0
~.~ t=-
o: -
':J: - ~
-':: >
-~
-:;- 0
- "'r1 >
-
~ ~
-
~ tt.:t
~
d
C1
~.~.~
l]
III
II) ""
;.; ~~
iii a,-
-t ...:
~ ~, ~~~.i I'
(J) ! ~",I ~!
1........ i I
~ ~'Ol ~
OJ .. -:...a: 1... ~
1> ::: ~~
() '~v~t~
T. M ~o
~ ..... t~~
l'" 'f,
F
1>
'10
I
i
I
I
!
z ~ '.>
:; ! ~ ~:~ '::
c ~ 5' a'H
i ;;41 l ~:;'
1 ~ t 11>1.;
hH'HH
.;g,~3 ~nti
~, ~ ~ l = a!"_
~~!1 lnf
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f -~..
~; ~ ! r . ~I i
J~Jif f Ii
H[ I J!
...! P' 1
at:!. _
i 31 ~
'" ~ - ~
ii ~ ~
jU i
q
-t
,', ,', n, l>
i~ 111J ~
i~ 000' l>
d( ill' ~
q . .r~ l!l
i 'C ~ 5
- 91 0' I! 1)
ij;",,~t:
'''5' ~''''!:J
... :l... !
iH (J)
.Si -l
i i ~ g
I-J l>
f; g
- ~ (J)
...
..:. a,:.o.
~ ~ ~ ;5'
.
-..--. "-.-----.
;llP
i'! :.' ~
H ~!j
'l.~ 1q{
~f 1i~'
r~ :~ I.
fa ~~a
<0 ~ i33-
~I l~!
IS.f ":a
r"'i;l ~
.~ g:h.
,) 9 0 ~
o .,. ~ 4.
~ q,
I ! i,
~ -; - I
'. : ::.
~ ii:
~
'.r~ ;~ r H r 1
.: - ~:-::., ...
~j~f~!i';'.~
It-! q "f.r;
" I., , .,. "
.~'. 1':'"'~""'7:r '81
!.-... :! ': ~~.i~. ~ ~
n~ ~~! .};l ~~
- ~ ,f "II' 'j ~ _. '...'}
..,.-.... ~ '"
~.. ~~ l,ii~
n~ . - 0
'1~5 ~:: ~~:~
3-~ ~ 1:::l...
n ~ . --
--~~ i i.:~
o~... ;: :.1:
. ,,[ .. c
jl~~ i {fl
:!l! i l~!
;I~~ -""3
~:!.:P [ t-r
i;'l[ : ~~~
3l~i .. l:!
;~~'~ :I '"'\
: 0.-< :;, 5:;:
!~
!
~
!
1'1;"'1 I
· 11111 111
, ~I
~~~ . k
~~t \~~ '\
en -, . It-,
o {~":'"
~ ~~~
~r .
1I'!''''II.I-f
Jl~''''-' 1':.:.... II I ..../
.::;j~~".~' tj
.i~" "t .-
~i~~: Ie)
'l';s P l'"
';~;,iII .., r
~~~ i J 5
~!~ I -t
i~a w
~;! k
..," ~"'!~o. r
~s2 g
~..;!i z
.. ~,~ ':'~.ll ' (j)
, ~ '~I' I
~.. ;~i iii'gj
";1- -~ "I-t
~~ Hi \D
~ .... l>
i 0
~ 7\
~~~ ~
~~~ m
c
r
to-
10
I
.. :E~;b ~
o =;U':J K
~ -ID- ~ 0
Ol ci'-;;> g -<
Cll -3 g... '0 ll:'
lD >c CD
J.1Jl 3~.
l.n. ""d r; .
~~ o2:~
.?"~G!t
..., 2. Q
~:=! In.
.:.:...~ ~.
~ a: 0
~o ~
'" It
Ol'" ...
",,,, ..
<DO
I-
N
....
<D
N
..30"".~-::'~
C
; ~
I - --:-- ::J
:-' - -:-'-ll- i1 1]1
, d.. ' 10
..t - ,-" 1>
- ,- ,I. 'Ji, j r
~ L _,,1, - '-;,.-' ~ r
-I :: "l~o
~ : I
~ f' "-"_.._-'~ ~ -t
; '- .>J ,,__.j; ~
i ~ Gij-t
I' \jl --i! ~
p "-"-"- '-'oj
{L, "-"-"- --~
. i -!
~ : .
i r" h_" ~'- --'i.J!
L _"_Y'.__~
" f I' ~
ii' ~
i I
i
.
CP
Q
I.
I t
I ,I
I
* F ' ii' j:lj1in ~ ~~i I
. ~llllf it11lrU cnr:!; ,I
i :111.1 !ihHH ~u.~! ! I
~I .1 · !ill'lhiU l> !~~ Ii,
i ~; J it; Hiilil~ @ ~ ! I:
E I( ! ,it I"i.ii~i 0 I i I
fl }- I ':~ i~d;!F 0;; :
~ I~ ~ Iii !Ifil~~
g.O . ~l"
H f .~i
1r 1 j;i
i;;, : HI
i~ 1 in
-I t 11 ~
i I 'I
- ' Ie
I; .
~ i H
.2 -
.'
5r.'tr: ~;:
i~f.~ ;~
;~~~ ~~
........-- .-,'"
... rtI- C
lit"" ~ ~'"
aa~o i~
_ :t.:!z
~... f
~ t l~
fl
t ':1
p
'!I ~
~1
~1
5 .
..~
-~
;; -
~i
i
~
~~
;~
~!
I :: Ii
II I
" I
" ,
I ::, ~
I (i ! I
II:
~
...
,
l$
I";:
Iii;
.,
;. :ji
"-"j-..
:D"
:.-..-t-..-,-.. ' ii
"-,
". "I ~
:~;;1;'!-:
'J' 'II
o ~;i~:
:ti~~j
~ ~ -
'i
-~
~t
~~
~
U)
'-t
it-
'\D
F
N
m
o
m
~
m
10
(j)
m
z
~ ~
~ l>
i ~
(J)
cn
o
m
-t
1>
F
!
~
~
il
J
110
I~ ~~~B
r:...o lIlI
-. -<
ow
0-0. jloOllfil(l('ot
"
",
.>.~
"'t
f?
'" ,-....
~ ..
,... r"".
i\-~
""" ~.
"0
::c
o
"0
o
(J)
m
c
~
(J)
-I
m
::c
"0
>
Z
ii Hi;
t. _II ! j
Wi ~;n ri ~
iJ~i ~i~~ G;! i
li I!~~ I!I
i ~~i hi
~ J i~
~,
I
J
I
!
mE s!U
"'.~! -It 1.
'i~. -i!'
~'&i l~il
~ i"
i~
i'
ei =1
I-
J
";.er, ~i~~
~:~I
nt__ ~:n
Ibi l~;i
- .
nil l~
fa ,
if
i
"
z
"
..
[IJ
~'
Environmental Consultants, Inc.
222 S. U.S. Highway One. Suite 201 · Tequesta, FL 33469 . (407) 744-7420' Fax (407) 744-288-:"
August 21. 1995
City of Boynton Beach
PO Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0130
Dear Mr. Haag:
,.'~: D r2 r,::::. rs 0 ~/7 IS ~': 1,'
I L5 ~ L~. ../ L:.' I: 'I'
.1' 1--'---------., '--" ' ,
I 1.1 I,
If ' :
! r\, I AUG 2 3 1995
,i. : , \ I
!U \j
I
Aun: Mike Haag
Re: Tara Oaks Gopher Tortoise Relocation
Approximately 55-60 gopher tortoises (Gopherus poLyphemus) are predicted to occur
on the Tara Oaks parcel. This estimated figure was determined using the burrow survey data
and data resulting from burrow investigation with an infrared video camera. The site has
been significantly impacted by prior land usage and clearing activities. These activities ha\'e
significantly degraded the available gopher tortoise habitat on the parcel.
The Tara Oaks parcel comprises +24 acres, Florida Game and fresh Water Fish
Commission (FGFWFC) studies indicate that llllC t-:uphcr tortoise reqllirc~ ()Jlc-half (0,5) Cl,:r,,'
of suitable habitat for long term survival. ,\pprl1\1111ately 30 acres of optImal habitat \'-ould
be required to support the predicted Tara Oa\-;s gopher tortoise population, Currently, the
parcel supports a population density in excess of tIllS recommended density and. as such.
on-site preservation is not a viable option due to the presence of insufficient. low qual ity
habitat on the Tara Oaks parcel.
C&N recommends off-site relocation of the entire population to a large, regional
gopher tortoise re-stocking area. Mr. Tom Stice (FGFWFC) concurs with the survey
findings and the need to accommodate the tortoises through off-site relocation (telephone
conversation August 21, 1995).
An off-site relocation plan is being prepared for submittal to the FGFWFC. Upon
authorization of the off-site relocation permit. the tortoises will be captured and relocated to
the designated recipient site.
The listed flora and fauna survey also identified three scrub mint (Conradina
grandiflora) plants which are slated to be relocated to the proposed on-site preservation area.
No other state or federally listed floral or faunal species were observed on the Tara Oaks
parcel.
.~~
"-"
The off-site gopher tortoise relocation permit issued by FGFWFC will not alter the
Tara Oaks Master Plan or Site Plan as shown in order to comply with the permit
requirements, nor will the proposed tree relocation plan.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely.
C&N ENVIRONMENTAL CONS LTANTS, INC.
c~e~(k
President/Senior Biologist
CMC/aj
cc: Kevin J. Hallahan, City of Boynton Beach
William V. Hukill, P.E., City of Boynton Beach
Susan Prillaman, Pulte Home Corp.
Marcie Tinsley, Kilday & Associates
95 -041
E X H I BIT "e"
....
<
..) I\~ (. "'.' ~ ') iff'.I&;; p-
. r,q" ~ I, . "1. \'JJ "
. , r, ." IIW II. rt i'
'll~;r. ~ ~'''' I': ,at I .
. -It il J I'
o. " " ..' I" iI
~ '. "~;l"~ ' .
~ - · 1 'I' "ill1llli~
~ !
:~ 1'11111'11111111111'" Iii
: ~ 1'1 lilt; ',I ~.II!! fi
, n1 i 11t~~IIIII~;li!:III.'i:; ,f
:tJ I IJI,I ',.e. II!,
"'0 ' i 'II! : 1'.1111'11
~ . .I~ nib'llll h,I!I' e
al' 11i"III, . -II
Z !:III:ai! (Jil'. I'III~
.. 1"11' I I I~.
u.. ~ .d; I In'~
~~I'I'I'iIi 111111.+': '11'11."1' II!!
;ii~ crIll lif111rt I r f .11!fl I!
~! llii III I~, J J I, ,(! fir, I~
, ~dl !, i'" ,I. f Illll~IIII'1 ~
, .~. .. II' II" ~f · n
.~ t:c; III I~I i I I '.'I.Ult.. II
~ ell 'II J !III hllll",llllJ
: al~ ~ ~ !. '1 i Itl I1II I
~~ 11 I ' '. ' I I I
, . r t ~'I
;~' ,~t ,I I llllllrr I
,~ ~ I ,( .1 I
l :~ i f I. I'ili
f ~ u hill
'; I! hlU
'I ~I. fill i
II lo'rr
. .' U~I
I J J IIII'{II' I r r ( g
II i.!f I ~ lIP H 6
I l = '! I
, ~ II iil Il EI" ,
J J r ~ t ,~t , ~ 'r .1:
~ Ii I '-. '~'II ,a c ;; N
i i I it';ll'",:.~I' Iii f
~ . . ..
. .~.. ", I.,.: ': ,. .
. I
ll!
II
. '
N
.
Ii '
13 c
e ..
. .t>..
..
Ii
~
-~
,
:1
II
~
:i
r
~I
r
',J. .,.,....;;_.
~.I
Ib", i J
Il~ t!
r.~n !i .
" .... ~
.' u
"'11 rt
... ".1
....
:s~
w
w
..
w
..
:15~ ~ '
~""iH
':I~ I .
",. II> .
"'I''' ·
~...... .
"'!}jl,
..
.....
.. ....
0.
w..
w.
..
0'"
..~
II>
.f~f ~ "
0.0
....
- <..
::::.. D
!.f~ II
..I. ill . .
g....
. iI. =- .
. .
;!~J ·
we..
....j!
aa
.. ..
,...
..... .
...
o ...
.. ~
-f"" e
.. ...
.._~
....rt~.
= ::1 il
!.:.. III
:;11'...._
D.. .
"..'
:0")-
. .. = !lI
rt!R
c..
wOo"
W' It
... .
C> -
..lit
e
..
It
.
..
t
I
;1::1 a I
o~ .... It ,.
~D o~. ..
~il.l ·
If J I
. : i~.
.IF I
. 0
..
..... .,
...,.
w
w
..
..
..
!ll!ll. 'j,
Iflih .
~ J F' ' I
,[,I '
I ~
.... -- --"- .---. . ..-
E X H I BIT "0"
lara Lakes Homeowners Association
43 Tara Lakes Drive East
Bo,,"on Beach, FL 33436
Telephone (407) 732-5475
00
\~ ~-, rn
j I;'
, II:
:~, '""' ~ ~ ~)
August 29, 1995
': ".,,,,,-'
,
Ms. Tambri J. Heyden
City of Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
PLANNING AND ,n~
ZONiNG DEPT. Ai
Dear Ms. Heyden:
In following the newspaper articles in regards to the Tara Oaks project and furthermore to a
telephone conversation that you and I have had in April on the subject, we the residents of Tara
Lakes are pleased that the "City of Boynton Beach" has "approved" the extension of Knuth Road
through to Woolbright Rd.
In addition, we are pleased to learn that there are no longer plans to access the new community
from Southwest Congress Blvd. With this in mind, the community of Tara Lakes wishes to ask
that the City of Boynton Beach "temporarily" annex the small extension of road that goes beyond
Tara Lakes Drive West to the Tara Lakes HOA. In addition, a dead end barricade and caution
sign would need to be placed in that position where the road presently ends by the City of
Boynton Beach to prohibit illegal vehicle traffic and dumping if this annex is allowed.
,
In regards to this matter, Tara Lakes HOA would like to place a basketball hoop in the "pro-
posed" area for the residents of our community to enjoy. As the paved extension of road exists,
there would be minimum cost to both Tara Lakes and City of Boynton Beach to allow for such
structure. In addition, the "temporary" annex could be removed at a later date if the decision
was made to connect Southwest Congress to Knuth Rd or other extension.
As the surfacing is already prepared it would be a shame to see this property torn up when it
could be used for real community activity. Our plan would make the extension a small park.
Possibly a small ficus hedge would be added to give the area some needed aesthetic look also.
Please consider our request and advise if you think this is possible. I can be contacted at my
office at (407) 997-2299 during normal business hours or at my home in the evening at (407)
737-9173. We are prepared to contact the .City Commission" or other official if necessary.
In conclusion, thank you in advance for your consideration.
Sincerely,
(1 t 1- '~l
{tA~ \\\l~,~
Robert J. Leissle
President
Tara Lakes HOA
Bob Leissle
President
Bruce Orns
Treasurer
Arleen Cogoni
Secretory
Tim Marshall
Generol
Alan Lenders
Landscape
Emil Mosmrfello
Archltulol
Terry L.. Golembiewski
Rlgotlon
E X H I BIT "E"
'"
"
rt
b"
..
"
><'
m
..
..
~
3:
tr1
::r::
0.
1-'-
El
Zt-'::r::I-tatJ:lt-'
01ll0. o III
;.;- :3 ;.;- ~ ;.;-
ro ro ::l ro
U'lUl Ullll n-~
o 1-'-
'l::ItJ:l :::lro
1-'0tJ:l ~
lll~rotJ:l
n-::lUlrolll
n-n-Illn-
o 0
:::l ::I"
CJ)tJ:lCJ)CJ)~
ro s:: 1-'- 1-'- ro
'0 1-'- 0. 0. III
III I-' ro ro '1
'1 0. ..
III 1-'---
n-:::ltr1H
1-'- \0 ::l :::l
o o.rt
:::l ro
.. I-' '1
o 1-'-
n-O
-'1
I I
G):I:
III 0
'1 s::
III Ul
IOro
ro ..
Z ......NN
-;; C:C:C:C:C:
Ul ~ CJ)
ro 1-'-::1"
rt rt III
0"::1"1-'
III I-'
o 0"
;.;-s::o
Ul 1-'-0
1-':3
0.'0
1-'- I-'
::l~
10
I-' N
O~
:::l -
10
I-'H
o ::l
rtrt
.. ro
'1
1-'-
o
'1
N
~
x
IJ)
o
tr1()
CJ)tr:I
~tJ
;J::r;J::r
~::u
tr:I
CJ)~
H
'l::ItJ
e:G)
tJtr1
I-.r:J
'1
o
:::l
rt
CJ)tJ:lCJ)CJ)~
ro s:: 1-"1-'- ro
'0 1-'- 0. 0. III
Illl-'roro'1
'1 0. ..
III 1-'- - -
rt:::ltr:lH
1-'- 10 :::l ::l
o o.rt
:::l ro
.. I-' '1
o 1-'-
rtO
-'1
G)X
III 0
'1 s::
III Ul
10 ro
ro ..
<:10
He:
t-';J::r
t-'t-'
;J::r
CJ)~
c:
'l::IZ
e:
tJ
hj
'1
o
:::l
rt
CJ)tJ:lCJ)CJ)::U I-.r:J
ro s:: 1-'- 1-" ro '1
'0 1-'- 0. 0. III 0
III I-' ro ro '1 :::l
'1 0. .. rt
III 1-"--
rt:::ltr:lH I I
1-'-\0 ::l :::l
o p.rt G):I:
::l ro III 0
.. I-' '1 '1 s::
o 1-'- III Ul
rtO IOro
- '1 ro..
CJ)tJ:lCJ)CJ)::U
ro s:: 1-'-1-'- ro
'0 1-'- 0. 0. III
Illl-'roro'1
'1 0. ..
III 1-'- - --.
n-::ltr:lH
1-'-\0 ~ ~
o o.n-
:::l ro
.. I-' '1
o 1-'-
rtO
-'1
I I
G)X
III 0
'1 s::
III Ul
IOro
ro ..
~
;J::r
::u
;J::r
o
:J::I
:;.::
CJ)
'l::I
c:
tJ
t-c:l
!:ltI
o
c....
tr:I
C':I
~
I I
N ...... NNN
o OOOU'lO
Z
o
III
'0
'0
'1
o
~
III
I-'
Ul:3CJ)~
ro III 1-'- ro
rtrto.lll
O'oro'1
III ::1""
o U'l
;.;- 0" CJ) -
S::::I"
1-'- III
I-' I-'
0.1-'
1-'-
~
10
N ...... ...... N......
o OOU'l......U'l
Ill'l::l
1-'0
1-'0
01-'
~ Ul
ro
o.~
o
rt
Ul ~ CJ)
ro I-'-::r'
rt rt III
0'::r'1-'
III I-'
00"
;.;-s::o
Ul 1-'-0
1-'8
0.'0
1-'- I-'
~~
10
~
1-'-
0.
ro
X
1-'0..1
00
~ -
10
...... ......Z......
U'l WOU'l,,",-O
- ---:J::I-
Ill'l::l
1-'0
1-'0
01-'
~ Ul
ro
o.~
o
rt
Ul ~ CJ)
ro I-'-::r'
rt rt III
0"::r'1-'
III I-'
o 0'
;.;-s::o
Ul 1-'-0
1-'8
0.'0
1-'- I-'
~~
10
I-' ......
0lJ1
:::l -
I.Cl
I-' H
o ~
rtrt
.. ro
'1
1-'-
o
'1
......
lJ1
X
-..J
o
I-.r:J
'1
o
~
rt
-t;I:I
HC:::
ZH
~b
<H
HZ
O~
c:::
>en
t-'tr:I
~
t-'t;I:I
0>
~C':I
en~
...." en
UlElCJ)::U
ro III 1-'- ro
rtrto.lll
O"oro'1
III ::r'''
o lJ1
;.;- 0" -
s:: CJ)
1-'- ::r'
I-'Ill
0.1-'
1-'- I-'
~
I.Cl
~
1-'-
0.
ro
X
I-' N
o ~
~ -
I.Cl
~
1-'-
0.
ro
X
lJ1
o
-..J
o
en
tr:It-c:l
~O
t;I:Io
g:;to<
~
en
en
&9
tr:I
entr:l
tr:IZ
~
t;I:Itr:I
>Z
C':IC':I
~to<
eno
en
sa
tr:I
~
1-'-
0.
ro
X
c:::
Z
H
I'oj-~
O~
OH'"<:I
~Zto<
t-c:lHO
~~~
~...."S;
~
0'\
o
tr:I
~
0.
I-' H
o ~
rtrt
.. ro
'1
1-'-
III
I-'
tr1
~
0.
tr1
~
0.
I-'H
o :::l
rtrt
.. ro
'1
1-'-
o
'1
I-'
o
rt
~
lJ1
tr:I
~
0.
I-'
o
rt
to<
o
~
I'oj>
o!:ltl
otr:l
~>
t-c:l_
~~
HH
Zz
~H
:3:
c::
:3:
...."
I-'
o
n-
N
~
N
~
I-'
o
rt
0..1
~
0..1
o
~
o
......
CXl
X
-..J
o
-- --1--
NN NW UlCJ) NW
0'\ lJ1 rt 1-'- 0 - t;I:I
~~ ~~ ~~ ~~I~U
"< n- "< n- "< rt i3! ~ z
........ .... '-' GJ
-------~,
I-' 1-'- ro I-' '0 ::u I-' 1-'- ro I-' '0 ::0 I-' 1-'- ro I-' 'O::u ro '0 III I.Cl 0 I-' '0 ::0 ! ""::I
O~PJOPJro O~PJOPJro O~PJOPJro 1ll1ll0'100PJro ~>
rt e g. g ~.g rt e g. ~ ~.g n- e g. ~~.g ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~.g , ~ '8 ~
, ~ n- 1-" 1-'- < rt 1-'- 1-'- ~ rt 1-'- 1-'- 8 1-'- I)) ::s 0 n- 1-'- 1-" i ~ H Z
1-" (t)::S '1 1-'- (t)::S '1 1-'- (t)::S '1 ro::s tll p.::s ro ::; '1 I ~ ~
I g. p.\Q~ g. o.\Q ~ g. p.l.Cl~ ~1.Cl 0 o.li:l~ I ~~~
I OJ 0 1-'- OJ 0 1-'- OJ 0 1-'- ~i 0 ~"- i ~ I ~> I
' I-'::S ~f) I-' ~ en I-'::S (01 ::; (01 I (")
, ! N trl '
::=:::--:=:===,= ,..:c:::=..=-===-:-:::====:::-J====::::==_.__,:::-_=,_;:,,___.._,_-~:::.J.,==,.._=~:J
lJ1
X
X
IJ)
lJ1
IJ)
o
X
X
X
IJ)
lJ1
......
o
o
......
o
o
'1j
c::
tj
t-3
o
~
z
::r:
o
c::
rn
trj
(')
::r:
~
::0
t-3
E X H I BIT "F"
BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC UNIT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REF:
T AMBRl HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR
SGT. MARLON HARRlS, POLICE DEPARTMENT
11 SEPTEMBER 95
TARA OAKS 2nd SUBMITTAL MEMO #0168
. . . '~"""~"'.
I have reviewed the above plans and stUl:-I,W:litit,aihpr~v:iou~,,~pwment from earlier memorandum.
In addition, there are now propose4{~);;;~9tii.mqyf\cces~:t1..$:~Si;along the western property line,
along Knuth Road. The plans ~t,~te::'~d;~:&rt6jt Box''('type loq:~:;": (am,qqt sure what this concept
refers to, but if it indicates th~)~se otakey to each gate and locl,:\:lt~~rl I would not recommend
this method of securing an "ElI!,~'tgency" access. These gates c~g.::pt~y:,an important part in
evacuation of residents andi::tact.i~il entrance for police critical inchfclltlueams. Locating keys for
specific dcvelopmcnts th(~~~~9Lt the city is not a prefcITed trend.:\:'~;:;':,,::'!!:)i
I also maintain my previous position on S.W. Congress Blvd. The development will only be
accessible from Knuth Rpack'v,ia W.:ijQYlP.Qn Be~tr:B.IY4. or W'Q.Qlbpght Road. Response time
for emergency vehiclesM.',O,ul4.",be gr~~tly"iit9~eased ~ndQtjIcer $fety b~~omes a concern. I realize
the objections from ClippefCpye an~~!Lak'~:::(JfT~r~::deV~:lopm~Qts, b~.1 believe completion of
S.W. Congress Blvd wod1d:cllhantei~spo:6se ti:mJ..to their dOmhhm:itie's also. A traffic study was
supplied by Yvonne Ziel Consultants, Inc. regarding traffic flow and projected growth in this
area. The study refers tp,.,a"J9.:?P study and also reflects the 1988 app~9Y't'9f 77 single family
units for Tara Oaks. The'stri~y is not valid at this point, as the proje4,*# plans call for tripling the
number of units, thereby"trip!,Y.hg the number ofvehicIe travel. Ta~p..,,'p~A:s now planning on 194
units and I feel the study;'fie~!i.::,tP be redone and further consider~p9.:!1::-9f S.W. Congress Blvd
being completed should be ldCliide.d in this project. :,'::,::"i:~:':,}
'\;;:~~~:~:>..,;,.)..} ::. ::: ..~.,
....,......:;..'
-~-~'_.~-~--------_.,,-_.,_._._-~~--_._----~_._--"'_._.~._~-_.__._--_.__.._._---~."._---_._----,-------
C!CUl".. I,), ' '
01;1- t " )
BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC UNIT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REF:
T AMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR
SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT
28 SEPTEMBER 95
TARA OAKS - REGARDING MEMO #0163 MEMO #0174
,.:-" . . . ' . ~;:'
This memo is regarding my earlier meJ?1~f:a,~d{d:Sjn~::tbe tp~::ffie,}low survey. I have had
conversation with Ms. Ziel regardi~'~:~~:::st!~Wittt@,~urvey',;:tlq4:::jJ:is now clear and I have no
problem with her traffic study a.Ad S~!y;':::::fstill malntain::wf positi~,?, on all other points
regarding this plan. ",}'::' ",",.. ," "",;>'"
;.: ..:.:........
....
Respe~A},
t""""""""""""""''''',.:&t'',::,',:,:::::::,::::)(}1 /J d /
" " " " ~l /cvJ1m~
IF"''') c gJ~! Harris
Police De~~rtment
.;:.' ::::.::.
.{i(l.t~ .:~~ ;ji
\t/{,./~~f'
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-424
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent jA,J I
Tara Oaks PUD - 2nd Review (Mast/!Plan Modification)
ill
SEP I 8 /995
@
rn@rnowrn
FROM:
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
RE:
DATE:
September 18, 1995
The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the masterplan modification (2nd review) for Tara
Oaks PUD. The following comments are submitted:
1. The developer appears to have addressed all comments in Recreation & Park memorandum
#95-379 with the exception of #2 concerning the provision of a clubhouse/meeting room
which is still shown as a cabana.
2. A cabana is not considered a separate recreation amenity but is considered a part of the
swimming pool. This department feels strongly that a recreation center building
(clubhouse/meeting room) is an essential part of the complete private recreation package for
this type residential development.
3. Representatives for the developer have indicated their willingness to provide a different 5th
private recreation element but not a recreation center/meeting room. We would 1lQ1
recommend this as an acceptable alternative.
4. At this time, the Recreation and Park Department cannot recommend one-half credit for
private recreation provided.
5. Based on 192 D.D. X .0150 acres = 2.88 acres recreation impact fee. Since the developer
is not recommended for one-half credit, the full 2.88 acres fee is required at the time of final
plat.
JW:ad
xc: Charles C. Frederick, Director, Recreation & Park Department
File
4::i:n. .! 3' j~
~,; tJ !;'\~:{"~
.~ ;J~..'>
.i"f'VlJ--"
,,', "..,~
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #95-165
TO:
Mike Haag, Zoning Site Administrator
FROM:
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ:
Tara Oaks Master Plan Modification - 2nd Submittal
DATE:
September 12, 1995
The applicant at the above site has requested can pickup at these location for solid waste disposal
and recycling which could possibly be accommodated, however the location and accessibility for
servicing must be shown at time of site plan submittal.
~~~
obert EIchorst
Public Works Director
RElcr
SEP 2. 6 lea5
..
t;
"=;,~,,,\=i ,t
,'. ,.<- I. _.. , .
..'~:, .'::':Z~'.~'I;..-c~~
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-371
DATE:
Mike Haag
zoning/Site Administrator
kJAA'~ Hukill, P.E.
(j(ji{ii\E-;; gin ee r
September 26, 1995
TO:
FROM:
RE:
TARA OAKS - TRAFFIC SIGNAL
As you know, Mr. Weisberg has informally reported that future
traffic at the intersection of Woolbright Road and Knuth Road is
not projected to warrant installation of a traffic signal at that
location. He suggests that it is possible for the City to require
the developer of Tara Oaks to escrow the cost of such a signal
($35,OOOI) to cover installation up to two years beyond development
substantial completion and subject to traffic counts at that time.
If the signal is not then warranted, the escrow payment would be
returned to the developer.
It is my opinion that traffic projections from Tara Oaks are so
light that the likelihood of a signal being required in the future
is minimal. If Knuth Road is constructed through to Boynton Beach
Boulevard, additional traffic would be generated at
Woolbright/Knuth. That may be pretty much offset by the reduction
in traffic to/from Tara Oaks since residents and visitors will have
the option of going either north or south on Knuth Road.
If the Commission wishes to make the escrow arrangement described
herein a condition of approval of Tara Oaks, we have no objection.
WVH:ck
xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager
Ken Hall, Engineering Aide
C:TARAOAKS,SIG
3
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-349
,J;-fl! J-
DATE:
Mike Haag
zoning/Site Administrator
~/j~m ~ukill, P.E.
~Eng1.neer
September 13, 1995
TO:
FROM:
RE:
TARA OAKS - TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
We have today first seen the September 12 traffic study for Tara
Oaks. The two significant requirements contained therein are a
right turn lane in at the project entrance and a southbound to
eastbound left turn lane at the Knuth Road/Woolbright Road
intersection.
Normally additional conditions would not be placed on an
application this late, but clearly it was the applicant's
delinquent submission of the traffic study which made it impossible
to respond earlier.
WVH:ck
C:TARAOAKS,TRF
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-304
DATE:
Mike Haag, zoning/Site Administration
~am Hukill, P.E., City Engineer
August 16, 1995
rnv~ @ ~ U ~ ~ .~.
I \ill NJ; I 1 1995 ,\!U
TO:
FROM:
RE:
TARA OAKS - MASTER PLAN REVIEW
Plft.NNING A~D
lONING OEP..
We have reviewed subject development and have the following to
offer:
A. Verify which roads require naming (for mail delivery)
with U.S. Postal Service.
B. Provide Traffic Impact Statement. Chap.2, Sec.9C4h(S),
pg.2-85
C. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and
collector streets. Chap.6, Art.III, Sec. 11A, pg.6-3
D. If street lighting is provided, establish deed
restrictions providing for a property owners association
to pay for the operation of the system wi thin the
development. Chap.6, Art.III, Sec.14, pg.6-4 and Chap.S,
Art.S, Sec.2A4, pg.5-9
E. Provide Certification by Developer's Engineer that
drainage plan complies with all City codes and
standards. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7 and Chap.23,
Art.IIF, pg.23-8
F. Minimum 15" pipe must be used in storm sewer. Chap.6,
Art.IV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7
G. Inlets must be in grassy areas unless otherwise approved.
Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.5B, pg.6-8 and Chap.23, Art.IIF,
pg.23-8
H. Locate all drainage easements. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.6B,
pg.6-9
I. Knuth Road is a collector road by both PBC and FDOT
standards (see FS 334.03(4) and must be dedicated to City
of Boynton Beach. Required dedication is 25'. Chap.6,
Art.IV, Sec. IOU, pg.6-15
J. Need SFWMD & LWDD acceptance prior to Engineering
approval. Chap.6, Art.VII, Sec.4B, pg.6-24
K. Permits must be obtained for work within R.O.W. Chap.22,
Art.II, Sec.7A, pg.22-3
L. In lieu of providing sidewalks on both sides of Knuth
Rd., install an eight foot concrete biCYCle/pedestrian
path along east side of road.
WVH/ck
C:TARAOAKS,MPR
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-348
September 19, 1995
To:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning
From:
Re:
TARA OAKS PUD
Northeast corner of Woolbright & Knuth Road extended
Building Division review of the response to our five comments in
Memorandum No. 95-299 (copy attached), is not acceptable unless
the plans show the correction. Our comments still stand, and it
should be noted that our code requires parking to be on-site with
the unit parking above the requirements allowed on common land.
Al
AN:mh
Attachment:
Copy of Memorandum No. 95-299
Plans
cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Department of Development Director
A:TARAOAKS.TRC
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 95 - 299
August 16, 1995
To:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
From:
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Tara Oaks POD
Northeast corner of woolbright & Knuth Road extended
Re:
Since a description of the request is to modify the Master plan
to change the type of units from apartments to townhouses, the
Building Division would like to make the following comments:
1. Site should be platted.
2. Parking should be adequate for each townhouse on its
own premise.
3. Recreation buildings should be constructed.
4. Plans should be in compliance with parking signs and
handicap code.
5. Plans should show established easements and setbacks as
it relates to townhouses.
A~r
Al Ne 01
AN:mh
Att. Plans
cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Department of Development Director
1l.:Tll.1ll.011.ItS.TIlC
,_lli, fn"'
t, ~ P
;.: ~ H
I " I'
ICiO!:; ..' i ",i
I,.,")...J . t~~
SEP 2
Fire Prevention Memorandum No. 95-346 WDC
.~
TO: Planning Department
FROM: Fire Department
DATE: September 21,1995
RE: MPMD 95-007
Tara Oaks
Knuth Road Extended
The attached are the standard requirements for security gates. These requirements should be
reflected on the site plan.
cc: Chief Jordan
FPO n Campbell
File
SECURITY GATES AND EMERGENCY ACCESS:
The Fire Department continues to have the opinion that
security gates are detrimental to Fire and Rescue operations.
The minimum performance for security gates is as follows:
1- Gates shall be openable by telephone, with a call from
central Dispatch center.
2- when the gate is opened by the call from central
Dispatch, it shall remain open until the emergency is over;
at which time central Dispatch will be told, by officer in
charge, to close the gate.
3- In case of a power failure the gate shall open
automatically.
4- Appropriate "Hold Harmless" agreement re: damage to
gates equipment, etc.
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-555
FROM:
Tambri J. Heyden
Plannlng and Zoning ~if~~o~
Michael E. Haagf?,krvor-
Zoning and Site De ent Administrator
TO:
DATE:
September 26, 1995
SUBJECT:
Tara Oaks (planned unit development) MPMD 95-007
(el imination of the extens ion of S. W. Congress Boulevard,
alteration of the location and type of recreation, a change in
unit type from apartments to townhouses, establishment of
perimeter buffer easements and dwelling unit setbacks and
establish a parcel line between the new townhouse proJect and
the church property)
Please be advised of the following comments relative to the second
review of the modified master plan for the above-referenced project:
1. With a distinguishable symbol show, dimension and label on the
master plan the building setback on each side of the
parcel/property line that separates the church property from
the residential property. It is recommended that the setback
dimension be labeled and shown follow1ng the perimeter of the
open space area identified on the plan with the exception of
the following specific setback dimensions for the gazebo:
south 20 feet, east 40 feet and west 260 feet. Change the
setback note for the recreation area to indicate that the 25
foot setback is for all amenities except for buildings which
shall follow the perimeter setbacks.
2. Add to the setback chart the side build1ng setback for the
internal lots.
3. Modify the submittal to 1nclude a survey of the entire PUD.
4. Specify on the master plan that the proJect shall be platted
and site plan approval is required for all improvements not
included with the plat and construction plans of the required
improvements.
5. Change the name of the document from "Master site Plan" to
"Master planTl.
6. Modify the parking data for the recreation amenities to
identify the correct number of required parking spaces.
7. It is recommended that the landscaping proposed for the east,
west and south perimeter buffer easements be changed from one
tree every thirty lineal feet plus shrubs twenty four inch on
center to a grouping (4 to 6) small native or moderate drought
tolerant trees (minimum height 8 feet) spaced thirty feet on
center and large native (evergreen) canopy trees (minlnn.lln
height 8 feet) spaced sixty feet on center plus a continuous
native or moderate drought tolerant hedge (minimum height 24
inches) spaced two foot on center. The plan view will depict
the landscape material 1n meandering path rather than a
stralght line.
8. Show on the master plan S.W. Congress Boulevard connecting to
Knuth Road extended.
9.
A revised master plan, which reflects all statt comments
conditions approved by the City Commission and planning
Development Board, shall be submitted in triplicate to
planning and zoning Department, prior to lnitiating
platting process.
and
and
the
the
10. Parking spaces shall be provided on the same lot as the
dwelling to be served.
Page 2
Memorandum No. 95-555
Tara Oaks
MPMD 95-007
11. Compliance with all applicable comments regarding conditions
of approval of the 1990 rezoning.
12. Compliance with all comments regarding the city's and Palm
Beach County Traffic Division's analysis of the traffic
statement submitted by the applicant's traffic consultant.
(See Exhibit "A" - letter from Palm Beach County Traffic
Division dated September 22, 1995.)
MEH:dim
xc: Central File
a:Tara2
E X H I BIT "A"
Board of County Commissioners
Ken L. Foster, Chairman
Burt Aaronson, Vice Chairman
Karen T. Marcus
Carol A. Roberts
Warren H. Newell
Mary McCarty
Maude Ford Lee
County Administrator
;
: ". Robert Weisman
! li .'
lll' f
"' ! !! f!
{
,
and Public Works
September 22, 1995
Ms. Tambri Heyden, Director
Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Department
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: TARA OAKS
Dear Ms. Heyden:
Per Mike Haag's request, the Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the
traffic impact study for the project entitled Tara Oaks, pursuant to the Traffic
Performance Standards in Article 7.9 of the Palm Beach County Land Development
Code. The proposed project will consist of 192 multi-family residential dwelling
uni ts and a 20,000 square foot church. The study reports thi s site to be
previously approved for 77 single-family dwelling units. The traffic study
addresses the increase in traffic from the proposed project, minus the approved
project. The access points are all on Knuth Road. The build-out for the project
is 1999.
The traffic study addresses the traffic from a church only. We have been seeing
many of the larger churches are being built with day school and day care
facilities. If the project has these uses, the traffic from these uses also
needs to be addressed.
The Traffic Division has determined that the project meets the requirements of
the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. If you have any
questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030.
Yvonne Ziel's letter recommends a right turn lane on Knuth Road, at the
residential driveway, if Knuth Road is not extended to the north. While the
projected peak hour traffic volumes meet the County minimum requirements for a
right turn lane, there appears to be a flaw in the logic.
Right turn lanes are needed to remove slower turning traffic from the through
traffic flow. If Knuth Road is not extended north, there is no through traffic.
The right turn lane would serve no purpose. When knuth Road is extended to the
north, the traffic would probably be oriented more to the north. There would be
a need for a left turn lane at the residential driveway. There appears to be
only a short section of Knuth Road missing north of this project. It seems
logical to make the connection to the north in conjunction with this development.
Otherwise there will be a missing section of roadway in a fully developed area.
"An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer"
@ printed on r9Cycled paper
Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1229 (407) 684-4000
September 22, 1995
Ms. Tambri Heyden, Director
TARA OAKS
page two
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
2vn );hJ>--a-PJ1
Dan Weisberg, P.E.
Senior Registered Civil Engineer
cc. William Hukill, P.E., Director
Boynton Beach Department of Development
File: TPS - Mun. - Traffic Study Review
g:\user\dweisber\wp50\tps\boyn52
~~
YVONNE ZIEL TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, IN
ft} p~\ -, ~,
U\ -,"p I,
, ...f 1 ,vI
I'Qtt:;; '>:;. ~h'j..
V' . B."v
M"
m@rnowrn
00
SEP I 5 1995
rn
PLANNING AND
918 U.S. Highway One, Lake Park, Florida 33403
September 12, 1995
Telephone (407) 842-0907. Facsimile (407) 842-9284
Mr. Michael Haag
Planning & Zoning Department
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
RE: Tara Oaks PUD
Dear Mr. Haag:
Yvonne Ziel Traffic Consultants, Inc. has been retained to asses the redistribution in traffic
as prepared in the 1990 traffic study, which reflected SW Congress Boulevard connecting
with Knuth Road. Since this connection is incorrect, the traffic study was revised to reflect
the correct roadway network. Due to our time constraint, the analysis was limited to the
necessary tables and trip generation data.
The traffic analysis used the same distribution as the 1990 traffic study and relocated the
SW Congress Boulevard project trips to Woolbright Road. Please find enclosed tables 1
through 6 which provide the existing conditions, trip generation, growth rate analysis and
future conditions with the redistribution of traffic. The project trips addressed where those
over the 1988 approval (77 single family units). As you can see from Table 5, all of the
roadways within the impact area meet the level of service (LOS) standards_
In addition to the LOS analysis, I prepared a driveway analysis to reflect a change in the
driveways. Figure 1 provides the daily, AM and PM peak driveway volumes and the project
volumes at Knuth Road and Woolbright Road. If Knuth Road is not extended to the north,
based on the projected driveway volumes, a right turn lane would be needed at the driveway
to the residential site. If however, Knuth Road is exended to the north, this right turn lane
would not be needed. The projected Tara Oaks volumes at the intersection of Kuth Road and
Woolbright road are not significant, but do indicate the need for an exclusive southbound to
eastbound left turn lane. Please call me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
( 1 ~ONNE Z~SUILTANTS. INC.
U nne Ziel, P.E.
sident
CC. Mr. William D. Cavanaugh, FPO, City of Boynton Beach
Ms. Susan Prillaman, Pulte Home Corporation
Mr. William Hukil, P.E, Engineering Department, City of Boynton Beach
Ms. Marcie Tinsley, Kilday & Associates
Sgt. Marlin Harris, Police Department, City of Boynton Beach
Traffic Engineering and Planning
TABLE 1
TARA OAKS PUD
EXISTING (1994.5) DAILY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
11-Sep-95
1994.5
#OF "D" ADT VIC 1994,5
ROADWAY FROM TO LANES CAP TRAFFIC RATIO LOS
GOLF RD MILITARY TR CONGRESS AVE 2L 13,400 5,861 0.44 B
CONGRESS AVE 1-95 2L 13,400 10,117 0.76 C
WOOLBRIGHT RD WEST LAWRENCE RD 2L 13,400 7,718 0.58 B
LAWRENCE RD KNUTH RD 4LD 29,400 15,732 0.54 B
KNUTH RD CONRESS AVE 4LD 29,400 15,732 0.54 B
CONRESS AVE 1-95 4LD 29,400 26,941 0.92 D
LAWRENCE AVE WOOLBRIGHT RD BOYNTON BEACH BLV 2L 13,400 5,170 0.39 B
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD OLD BOYNTON RD 2L 13,400 10,911 0.81 C
BOYNTON BEACH BLV EL CLAIR RANCH RD MILITARY TRAIL 6LD 45,000 31,071 0,69 B
MILITARY TRAIL LAWRENCE RD 6LD 45,000 28,117 0,62 B
LAWRENCE RD CONGRESS AVE 6LD 45,000 30,940 0,69 B
CONGRESS AVE EAST 6LD 45,000 29,135 0,65 B
OLD BOYNTON RD MILITARY TRAIL LAWRENCE RD 4LD 29,400 10,990 0,37 B
LAWRENCE RD CONGRESS AVE 4LD 29,400 11 ,962 0.41 B
CONGRESS AVE BOYNTON BEACH BLVD WOOLBRIGHT RD 6LD 45,000 29,091 0.65 B
WOOLBRIGHT RD GOLF RD 6LD 45,000 29,545 0.66 B
GOLF RD SOUTH 6LD 45,000 27,698 0.62 B
EL CLAIR RANCH RD BOYNTON BEACH BLVD WOOLBRIGHT RD 2L 13,400 7,006 0.52 B
TABLE 2
TARA OAKS PUD
EXISTING (1994.5) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
PEAK 1 ,994.5
#OF LOS PEAK VlC
ROADWAY FROM TO LANES "D" HOUR RATIO LOS
GOLF RD MILITARY TR CONGRESS AVE 2L 1,220 533 0.44 B
CONGRESS AVE 1-95 2L 1,220 921 0.75 C
WOOLBRIGHT RD WEST LAWRENCE RD 2L 1,220 702 0,58 B
LAWRENCE RD KNUTH RD 4LD 2,670 1,432 0.54 B
KNUTH RD CONRESS AVE 4LD 2,670 1,432 0.54 B
CONRESS AVE 1-95 4LD 2,670 2,452 0.92 D
LAWRENCE AVE WOOLBRIGHT RD BOYNTON BEACH BLVD 2L 1,220 470 0.39 B
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD OLD BOYNTON RD 2L 1,220 993 0.81 C
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD EL CLAIR RANCH RD MILITARY TRAIL 6LD 4,100 2,827 0.69 B
MILITARY TRAIL LAWRENCE RD 6LD 4,100 2,559 0.62 B
LAWRENCE RD CONGRESS AVE 6LD 4,100 2,816 0.69 B
CONGRESS AVE EAST 6LD 4,100 2,651 0,65 B
OLD BOYNTON RD MILITARY TRAIL LAWRENCE RD 4LD 2,670 1,000 0,37 B
LAWRENCE RD CONGRESS AVE 4LD 2,670 1,089 0,41 B
CONGRESS AVE BOYNTON BEACH BLVD WOOLBRIGHT RD 6LD 4,100 2,647 0,65 B
WOOLBRIGHT RD GOLF RD 6LD 4,100 2,689 0.66 B
GOLF RD SOUTH 6LD 4,100 2,521 0.61 B
EL CLAIR RANCH RD BOYNTON BEACH BLVD WOOLBRIGHT RD 2L 1,220 638 0.52 B
TABLE 3
TARAOAKSPUD
TRIP GENERATION RATES
11-Sep-95
AM PEAK TRIP
RATES
PM PEAK TRIP
RATES
LAND USE
RESIDENTIAUMF/APT
RESIDENTIAL-SF
CHURCH/SF
ITE
CODE
ADT
TRIP RATES
TOTAL
PERCENT
ENTER EXIT
TOTAL
PERCENT
ENTER EXIT
220
210
560
7 0.491*(X)+3.391
10 LNT=,867*LNX+O.39
9.32 0,74
17
26
64
83 LNT=,928*LNX-O.11
74 LNT=.902*LNX+O.52
36 0.72
68 32
65 35
54 46
SOURCE: INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS, TRIP GENERATION, 5TH EDITION
SOURCE: PALM BEACH COUNTY IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE- ADT
TABLE 4
TARA OAKS PUD
TRIP GENERATION
ADT AM PEAK TRIPS PM PEAK TRIPS
LAND USE SIZE TRIPS TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT
RESIDENTIAUMF/APT 192 1,344 98 17 81 117 79 37
CHURCH/SF 20,000 186 15 9 5 14 8 7
RESIDENTIAL SF - VESTED 77 770 64 17 48 85 55 30
PROPOSED PROJECT (MF PLUS CHURCH): 1,530 112 26 86 131 87 44
TOTAL LESS VESTED SF: 760 48 9 39 46 32 14
-,~"---,,--,------~--"-'-'-'._---"~"'"-'-----------------.-----..----.-
TABLE 5
TARA OAKS PUD
PROJECTED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
12-Sep-95
03:10:21 PM
ROADWAY
FROM
TO
#OF
LANE
PERCENT
LOS 1994,5 1999 1999 PROJECT
"D" ADT BACKGR PROJECT TOTAL OF
CAP TRAFFIC GROWTH TRIPS TRAFFIC LOS CAPACITY
GOLF RD MILlTARYTR CONGRESS AVE 2L 13,400 5,861 264 14 6,139 B 0,10
CONGRESS AVE 1-95 2L 13,400 10,117 456 40 10,613 C 0,30
WOOLBRIGHT RD WEST LAWRENCE RD 2L 13,400 7,718 348 38 8,104 B 0,28
LAWRENCE RD KNUTH RD 4LD 29,400 15,732 709 46 16,488 B 0,16
KNUTH RD CONRESS AVE 4LD 29,400 15,732 709 714 17,155 B 2,43
CONRESS AVE 1-95 4LD 29,400 26,941 1,215 239 28,395 D 0,81
LAWRENCE AVE WOOLBRIGHT RD BOYNTON BEACH BLVD 2L 13,400 5,170 233 76 5,479 B 0,57
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD OLD BOYNTON RD 2L 13,400 10,911 492 38 11,441 C 0,28
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD EL CLAIR RANCH RD MILITARY TRAIL 6LD 45,000 31,071 1,401 30 32,502 B 0,07
MILITARY TRAIL LAWRENCE RD 6LD 45,000 28,117 1,268 38 29,423 B 0,08
LAWRENCE RD CONGRESS AVE 6LD 45,000 30,940 1,395 44 32,379 B 0,10
CONGRESS AVE EAST 6LD 45,000 29,135 1,314 64 30,513 B 0,14
OLD BOYNTON RD MILITARY TRAIL LAWRENCE RD 4LD 29,400 10,990 496 8 11,493 B 0,03
LAWRENCE RD CONGRESS AVE 4LD 29,400 11,962 539 8 12,509 B 0,03
CONGRESS AVE BOYNTON BEACH BLVD WOOLBRIGHT RD 6LD 45,000 29,091 1,312 290 30,692 B 0,64
WOOLBRIGHT RD GOLF RD 6LD 45,000 29,545 1,332 183 31,060 B 0,41
GOLF RD SOUTH 6LD 45,000 27,698 1,249 127 29,074 B 0,28
EL CLAIR RANCH RD BOYNTON BEACH BLVD WOOLBRIGHT RD 2L 13,400 7,006 316 8 7,329 B 0,06
TABLE 6
TARA OAKS PUD
FUTURE (1999) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
1999 1999
PEAK 1994,5 PK HR PK HR TOTAL
#OF LOS PEAK BACKGR PROJECT PEAK HR
ROADWAY FROM TO LANES "D" HOUR GROWT TRIPS TRAFFIC LOS
GOLF RD MILlTARYTR CONGRESS AVE 2L 1,220 533 24 2 560 B
CONGRESS AVE 1-95 2L 1,220 921 42 7 969 C
WOOLBRIGHT RD WEST LAWRENCE RD 2L 1,220 702 32 7 741 B
LAWRENCE RD KNUTH RD 4LD 2,670 1,432 65 8 1,504 B
KNUTH RD CONRESS AVE 4LD 2,670 1,432 65 123 1,619 B
CONRESS AVE 1-95 4LD 2,670 2,452 111 41 2,603 D
LAWRENCE AVE WOOLBRIGHT RD BOYNTON BEACH 2L 1,220 470 21 13 505 B
BOYNTON BEACH OLD BOYNTON RD 2L 1,220 993 45 7 1,044 C
BOYNTON BEACH EL CLAIR RANCH MILITARY TRAIL 6LD 4,100 2,827 127 5 2,960 B
MILITARY TRAIL LAWRENCE RD 6LD 4,100 2,559 115 7 2,681 B
LAWRENCE RD CONGRESS AVE 6LD 4,100 2,816 127 8 2,950 B
CONGRESS AVE EAST 6LD 4,100 2,651 120 11 2,782 B
OLD BOYNTON R MILITARY TRAIL LAWRENCE RD 4LD 2,670 1,000 45 1,046 B
LAWRENCE RD CONGRESS AVE 4LD 2,670 1,089 49 1,139 B
CONGRESS AVE BOYNTON BEACH WOOLBRIGHT RD 6LD 4,100 2,647 119 50 2,817 B
WOOLBRIGHT RD GOLF RD 6LD 4,100 2,689 121 32 2,841 B
GOLF RD SOUTH 6LD 4,100 2,521 114 22 2,656 B
EL CLAIR RANCH BOYNTON BEACH WOOLBRIGHT RD 2L 1,220 638 29 668 B
TARA OAKS PU D
GROWTH RATE CALCULATIONS
GROWTH
ROADWAY FROM TO YEAR VOLUME YEAR VOLUME RATE
GOLF RD MILITARY TR CONGRESS AVE 1991.5 7,710 1994.5 5,861 -8.73
CONGRESS AVE 1-95 1991.5 9,420 1994.5 10,117 2.41
WOOLBRIGHT RD WEST LAWRENCE RD 1991,5 NA 1994.5 ERR
LAWRENCE RD KNUTH RD 1991.5 12,239 1994.5 15,732 8.73
KNUTH RD CONRESS AVE 1991.5 1994,5 ERR
CONRESS AVE 1-95 1991.5 26,500 1994.5 26,941 0.55
LAWRENCE AVE WOOLBRIGHT RD BOYNTON BEACH BLVD 1991.5 NA 1994.5 ERR
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD OLD BOYNTON RD 1991 ,5 10,721 1994.5 10,911 0.59
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD El CLAIR RANCH RD MILITARY TRAIL 1991.5 23,822 1994.5 31,071 9.26
MILITARY TRAIL LAWRENCE RD 1991.5 26,306 1994,5 28,117 2.24
LAWRENCE RD CONGRESS AVE 1991.5 31,326 1994.5 30,940 -0.41
CONGRESS AVE EAST 1991.5 34,930 1994.5 29,135 -5.87
OLD BOYNTON RD MILITARY TRAil LAWRENCE RD 1991.5 11,052 1994.5 10,990 -0.19
LAWRENCE RD CONGRESS AVE 1991,5 12,986 1994.5 11 ,962 -2.70
CONGRESS AVE BOYNTON BEACH BLVD WOOLBRIGHT RD 1991.5 28,013 1994.5 29,091 1.27
WOOLBRIGHT RD GOLF RD 1991.5 29,609 1994.5 29,545 -0.07
GOLF RD SOUTH 1991.5 25,454 1994.5 27,698 2.86
EL CLAIR RANCH RD BOYNTON BEACH BLVD WOOLBRIGHT RD 1991.5 NA 1994.5 ERR
1991.5 194,026 1994.5 199,815 0.98
AVERAGE
-
.....
Q Q)
..q: Q)
E E
~ Q) :::l :::l
E "0 "0
~ :::l > >
.. "0 .... ....
~ ~ :::l :::l
> 0 0
~ I I
~ t t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t t ~ ~ ~~t ~ t ~ j ~ j ~ ~ 'co ..lIo:: ..lIo::
C'll C'll
0 Q) Q)
(ij a.. a.. en
...:m...... e!....... Cl - ::iE ~ ....
0
Z I- a.. Z
r w j w
C) C"') :E
w 0) w
....... ...J 0 >
~ 0
...-.. ...-.. :::> :E
(J) M a..
....... ~ C>
- -
LO (j) Z
~ Z .....
J c:: w
<( a:::
Cl :::> :J
c::: 0 .... Cl
I c:: i:L
I- <(
::> :::>
z 0:: 0
~ <( I
..... ~
..... ................. <( tti
Q ':::::::((((::::l:~~ 0 .. Q.
..q: W
C"') :::::,,:::::::::::::~('. :: ....
0) ... ......... . .~ <( .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~.: en
r
................. <( .
IIIIIIIIIIIII!!!!!I!!!I!:!II:.II:!.III
""'"
...-..
""'"
-
..rr..~.$:........
r
LO ....
U ~
...-.. ~ :I
""'" .... ~ ....
~ z 0
- w f!i z :t
- ~ ..
N 0
z a
i$ ..s
w ...
:...J ~ ...
Z :) ~
<n m '"
c
...-.. Z z ...
~ 0 ;:; w
0 ~ '"
...-.. ~ () :5
M w uI
- ~ () z
LO ~ u:: Ii
00 LL
J 1. ~ !2
~ :I:
..
::>
..
10
L ...-.. 'a~ .LHE>I~8100M ~
""'" N
...-.. J N 00
LO C\I -
-
TRACKING LOG - SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL
PROJl::C'r TITLE:
DESCRIP'l'ION:
cl'yPt; :
DA'l'E REC; D:
Tara Oaks PUD
Minor Master Plan Modlt1.Catlon
NEW SITE PLAN MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION
7/25/95 AMOUNT: $500.00 RECEIPT NO.: 10434
FILE NO.: MPMD 95-007
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
TWELVE (12) SETS SUBMITTED:
COLORED ELEVATIONS RECIO:
(Plans shall be pre-assembled. The planning & Zoning Dept. will number each
sheet of their set. The planning Dept. set will be used to check the
remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match.)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
APPLICATION & SUBMITTAL:
DATE:
ACCEPTED
DENIED
DATE:
DATE OF LETTER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES:
ACCEP'rED
DENIED
2nd SUBMIT'l'AL
DATE:
DATE:
DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER:
REVIEWER'S NAME:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
(Label TRC Departments on each set of plans)
DATE AND MEMO NUMBER OF MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW.
DATE SEN'l': '8/'K RETURN DATE: 8ft &- MEMO NUMBER: 1ife/fi~
1st REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED
PLANS MEMO # / / IICiI PLANS MEMO # I DATE I IICil
util. ~:.2~~ I I~ planning I . I-
. P .W. 'r' " I~ 'Building y.... 9S'-~99 I ~Ij' . C-
> -f..J.~/ /-
Parks 7'~-3?<J / '.2 / --.&.... 'Engineer y .. 9S"-.qDY I 14 I~
Fire ~ q'5""-~ /(,:, I C- Engineer y" - I 1i -- 1-
Police ' t'J/s'6 / b ' Q...., -forester 9.s -3? / I
I- ff, j ~~
o.~. '- 'I '. 8;;/q~--
'PYPE OF VARIANCE(S) DA'I'E OF MEETING:
.
DATE OF LETTER SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS:
(Aesthetic Review App., dates of board mtgs. & checklist sent out wi comments
NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID:
DATE 12 COMPLETE SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW:
(Must be assembled. Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents)
COLORED ELEVATIONS REC I D:
MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM 2nd REVIEW.
DATE SENT: MEMO #:
RETURN DATE:
2nd REVIEW RECOMMENDATION/DENIAL
MEMO # I DATE
/ Q'2!
'1~-[f~'5 I ~-/":)..
qt:;-'ll-'f' / ,- I~
q~--3'fG} / CfJ.2../
dOIf.8 / q-I'1
/IIR/DII
/
I
/
/
I
/IIR/D"
I
/
/ C./
1_-
/
utile
~P.W.
--- Parks
~ Fire
~ Pol ice
PLANS
V'
Y
''7
1
Planninq
Build1nq
~ Enqineer
!f1ginee!'
Forster
PLANS
Y
Y
'I
MEMO #
:l$:-3'1f
'('-4 Cff
/ DATE
/ '}-/1
I
/ qU3
I
/
LETTER TO APPLICANT REGARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND
PLACED AT THE PROPERTY DATE SENT/SIGNS INSTALLED:
flk:~ /~h7
LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS
SCHEDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD
CCjCRA
~ ~lch
" '
DATE APPROVAL LETTER SENT:
A: 'fRACKING. SP
BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC UNIT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REF:
TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR
SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT
9 AUGUST 95
TARA OAKS MEMO #0158
I have reviewed the above plans and ob.,~p.r:rtQe::f~il~~irig;,,,,::,.,,,,.,,,,
-the master plans originally shoW"'$S"I.::::::('Q,dgr~s~1Blvd J6 b\i:.:~()nstructed to connect with
Knuth Road. The newly suJ~fniij~:~::plari'~ app~r~ntly ati.9rt~:'lhis,:f9.ncept. I disagree with
this, as access to Knuth ~Qi(d wouid only be from Boynton ~e~9h':'Blvd and Woolbright
Road. This would create:::a,,~~J;>lic safety concern and reque~t'l1if~:"Qe reconsidered.
.:..;:.' :: .{' ":::.'::~
-the plans show an "u#.~an~~d guard gate". A "telephone acce~;:: ~~~ is recommended for
emergency police and.:itii'itentrance. This type of gate allows th~:p~Hcelfire dispatcher to
telephone the number of the gate, thereby allowing the police/fir'(;- unit to enter the develop-
ment. . This ty?e. of::'S,yst7~:. has Pf?Ye.:q:;;&~cces~tpl:it:t:~f:her g~~(t:g~unities presently
estabhshed wIthm :he"'CltY,',:,',',::J f ::,"",..".,,::::<::::: '1 !:::::::::::::::::::::::",/ I,i, ii,.,.,...,.,.,."".,::::I!::)
~.-.. ..... ',,', - t:..~~
ResPA)..IY'/1/11 J::':::"::::~
rJj1'I/~~
Sgt. Marlon Harris C-G;:~
. '~'..~.~.' .
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-371
FROM:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Kevin 1. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Y- ~ ~
Tara Oaks PUD - Master Plan Modification
TO:
RE:
DATE:
August 15, 1995
1. The applicant must provide a written statement from one of the approved consultants from
the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. This statement should note that the
permit from this Agency will not change the master plan as shown in order to comply with
the requirements of their permit.
2. The applicant should also provide a similar written comment in reference to:
a. the tree management plan
b. the flora and fauna survey (environmental assessment).
These two items must be completed to allow the master plan to move forward in the City review
process.
TO:
Tambri 1. Heyden,
Planning & . n
l
MEMORANDUM
Utilities # 95-255
FROM: John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilities
Date: August 14, 1995
SUBJECT: Tara Oaks PUD,
Master Plan Modification, First Review
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments:
I. Please show proposed water and sanitary sewer to POD 3 Church,
(Sec. 26.16(a)).
2. Sanitary sewer mains, running between buildings, shall have a minimum easement
of twice the depth plus 5' (five feet), (Sec. 26.33(b)).
3_ Include provisions to connect to existing 10" water main on S. W. Congress Blvd.
It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or
Peter Mazzella at 375-6404.
sm
xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor
Peter Mazzella(v
File
August 16, 1995
\9)1 ~ @ ~ U ~1
~U\1 JlIj' 6 '995
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-299
To:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
From:
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Tara Oaks POD
Northeast corner of Woolbright & Knuth Road extended
Re:
Since a description of the request is to modify the Master Plan
to change the type of units from apartments to townhouses, the
Building Division would like to make the following comments:
1. Site should be platted.
2. Parking should be adequate for each townhouse on its
own premise.
3. Recreation buildings should be constructed.
4. Plans should be in compliance with parking signs and
handicap code.
5. Plans should show established easements and setbacks as
it relates to townhouses.
/J~'
Al Ne 01
AN:mh
Att. Plans
cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Department of Development Director
A:TARAOAltS.TIl.C
FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-325 WDC
August 16, 1995
TO:
Planning Department
FROM:
Fire Department
00 rn I'~ ~ .~:lrn
r:-,
L"~- ,. ,_.._.3
PLp,(' \. ~
ZGNl!i,...::^',_.", ~-,
SUBJ:
MPMD 95-007
Master plan Modification
Tara Oaks
Knuth Road Extended
Roads and Access:
We would prefer that SW Congress Blvd remain, as it offers an extra
route for response to the site. There is only one entrance shown
on the new plan. TWO entrances should remain.
Building sites, parking lots,
addressed with the Site Plan.
moving forward.
turn around areas, etc. will be
We have no objection to the plan
~.
cc: Chief Jordan
steve Campbell, FPO II
File
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #95-145
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden. Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Robert Eichost, Public Works Director
SUBJ:
Site Plan - Tara Oaks
DATE:
August 16, 1995
The sanitation vehicles are unable to provide service at the above location with the present plans.
If you have any questions please give me a call at 375-6201.
bert Eichorst
ublic Works Director
REier
I 7
~,.
RECREATION & PARKS MEMORANDUM NO. 95-379
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
John Wildner. Parks SUPerintendenf
August 21, 1995
rn
Ul ~ 0 \'II rn ;!', ~ ,I
AUG 2 11995 ~I
I
PLANNING AND
~ON1NG DEPT.
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT: Master Plan Modification: Tara Oaks PUD
The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the master plan modification for Tara Oaks PUD.
The following comments are submitted:
1. Based on a continuation of 192 multi-family dwelling units (now shown as townhomes), the
recreation dedication requirement remains 192 D.U. x .0150 acres = 2.88. Based on 1/2
credit for private recreation, the requirement is 1.44 acres in cash.
2. The previous plan shows five (5) recreation elements including a clubhouse. Assuming that
the cabana shown on the revised plan is changed back to a clubhouse/meeting room, the
following listed recreation elements would be recommended for 1/2 credit.
1. Pool
2. Clubhouse/Meeting Room (shown as a cabana)
3. Sand volleyball
4. Jogging trail
5. Gazebo/garden amenity (landscaped, quiet area)
3. Provision of the meeting room instead of a cabana may require additional parking based on
Planning Department standards.
4. Jogging trail must be asphalt or other permanent surface to minimize maintenance. Length
must be shown on the plan (1/4 mile minimum).
5. Specifications for sand volleyball or other park equipment must be reviewed by this
department prior to pennit to insure equipment, etc., is of commercial quality suitable for use
by the number of residents in the community.
6. Some parking must be provided for the two (2) recreation elements in the southern portion
of the PUD. The original master plan called for a lake instead of a detention area. By
restoring a lake to the site, it is possible that additional usable land may be available for
recreation open space and as a location for parking.
7. The Recreation & Park Department has no objections to dead ending S.W. Congress Blvd.
prior to entering this PUD, but will require arrangements for private landscape maintenance
be made for r.o.w. not used for roadway.
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Page -2-
August 21, 1995
8. All above comments are based on the preservation area remaining in the southern portion of
the property.
JW:cm
L .I
"~
I .
I
'- -
I
L
Z
-\
\J)
(j)'
I
I
_____--.J
--0/
,
I
----~
f'V,
()'
I
-----,
f'...j I
. ij I
'"
A'~
r I
C) r---
-\
I
r ,
~ I
I
~ '.1--
:u oil
, I
,.;1
.,
'Nf:
~
:~ '~!
I, .;v;.
, , >!:\-~
~ - Q
i! <,.,',.;
::'\'
'" ~
)>
-\ 3
03
-< ~ '"
\) 71:)
3
03
'"
10
~ .).J '-I) .J:\..,\J ,
V,
'J\ \ ';/\ V\'~ ~
\ \ ~ I <.[',
-t.. "", \ ~\
\? 'C> ~\,W
q.. ...... ~..( ~,
"" f- ~
.....t:: , -lOl
\It .It: ~ " JI..
.." :tJ 0 :0 ~ c:: ", .." 5!!
0 ~ li ~ ::s ~. ~
ft Q qq
it 0 ." ~ a ~ i'
;:.- Ai" 0 (II ~
:::s (1) 'fa. II l1-
::s ~
CD
...
....--.... ~(J)---l. r ^
~ coCUl Q -.
0 (/) :+ Ul ::J -
'-.J ~co~ 0- 0.
'--" (/) Q
"lJ-J.'1 () '<
Q) Q 00 Q
OJ 30' -0 ~,
1O )>c co
I :3
(J1 OJ )> l>
U1 co \J , (I)
N Q () (I)
- ::r (j)
N () 0 -. 0
::r 0 ~ 0 0
. (t) co
-.
'1 () Q 1> ;'!I'
n '1 ~
(/) -+-
x - (1);\
0 """ r-
....--.... ..., -u fA: m
~ -. ,j
0- -
0 9 0
'-.J ::J -
=
'--" ::J "
VJ co OJ - .~-
(J) VJ , . '-"".-. "---.-
OJ ~ (/) 0 c~~
1O 0 CiVil
I ---l.
....." cs=e>
N 0"-
z::t>>
Ul z~ [MJ
C':lz
1O OC':l ~ r:::::I
m;J:o
N ""Oz
:-lg
I II
---4
l>
I
/
(JJ
<)
f:.
rr
(
Ij)
--\
}>
CD
r
N
\II
'C)
~j)
(j
'C)
'T.
~ e
~ :t
7Q
()
}>
Q
J
<0 --+ -I
* -, :::r
0 <1>
o.(f)
ro ::l
(f) 0 (1)
Z ::l 0
0 0 - -,
0 --+() ([)
Ul
l> --+ U
-I :::ro
f"T1 ro - 'J
(f) Cb -,
if) 0. <.0
~~ (f) --+--+ 0
0 Cb :::r :J
0 n
r '"0 -
~ (S 0 Q.
OJ (J) --+ (!)
0 (J) :::r -0
~ ~ ::0 rrCb 0
z '<<0 (J)
c;:: G) -, ri'
~ -0 (J)
1'\ o c
~ -I :E ::l CJ
'" f"T1 ~o. -,
~ (j) (1)
~ -f :E
~~ 0.0 (J)
r c - :::r "
0 -, ro 0
l.. 0 :)' -, ::E
f), l> <0 :J
ro
=:t () < r,.)
r 0 c ft)
Z -, 0
-, 0 ,I'
~ (f) ro :E 0
::l 0
--+C
'0. 0. ~
~ ()
',-
-, 0'
~ 0 .-+
C Cb ::l
u:J T'
::rw
,-+ 0' ~
" 0 Cb
f::;;~ n c OJ,
0 -
::l
~, e: (J1_ 0
ri' .:J
-, 0 CL CJ
.~ g -, :E p
(J) 3
~ 0 :::r
-, :J
fb
- (J1
~ (1) 0
ro 0
0' ,~
~ ([) 0
0 -
~ :E :::r
("
(1)
0 x <ll
(J) 0
~ ri' (f)
::l :-+
'J '.D
,SE~-12-1995 16:12
YZTC-/F I NEL I NES
P.01
YVONNE ZIEL TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC.
918 US ffiGHWAY ONE
LAKE PARK, FLORIDA 33403
(407) 842.0907
FAX (407) 842.9284
FAX TRANS:MITI'AL
FAXNO:~5 bJ6S
FROM: Y ~ DATE: 4Lo...)~
TO: ~O\ ~~0/'~
NUMBER OF PAGES: b (INCLUDING TmS ONE)
ORIGINALS WILL [ ] WILL NOT [ ] FOLLOW IN THE MAIL
~ 't\w~ ---rl^~"O tQ~
~ALVI" AND HOBBES
IT USED 10 'BE:. 1'\-\"-\ IF t>. tlOW. wmt to\ooa-tS. ft>.'1.ES.
Cl\~'i W~1'a) ~I"G AND o.~ ~. El9ti~
OOO~ \N t>.. ~E8{. \T Wf\'5 WN4.~ ~9:ffiI\~ 1"'5T~n.'(!
(O~\OtRg) Jl.. R\l<;~ J~. \~\) 'tEQ.\NOLOGr'f: JU'5T
~ \-1(0 B'e LOCt'< \t) ~1 \T. IK~'5E'S ~'i.PECT"TIO\olS.
I
l\l€SE. w,<:MI~GS tD(T ~
1I~ EJ\'S\'dt - TIl.E'( ~
L\tE "'~E "ARA'SSl:.O.
BILL WATTERSON
Sl~ tAU"-\I1i;S If we. ~
10 to\l(0)'f("~ ~ l.E\'5\l~
1\.t\'5?" W\-lo'$- 'N~D 1"''1ENT
G3f 'tW.1' ~\N~c) \\U."T
~\KO Qi'l\1>\i?! t)() ","I~
I E~C\E~~\.~t
SEP-12-1995 16:13 YZTCJFlNELINES
~.~
~
YVONNE ZIEL TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS. INC.
P.02
Telephone (407) 842.0907 · Facsimile (407) $42.9284
918 U.S. Highway One, lake Park, Florida 3S4OS
September 12, 1995
Mr. Michael Haag
Ph~l'p',iT'g & Zoning Department
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
RE: Tara Oaks PUD
Dear Mr. Haag:
Yvonne Ziel Traffic Consultants, Inc. has been retained to asses the redistribution in traffic
as prepared in the 1990 traffic study, which ref1ected SW Congress Boulevard connecting
with Knuth Road. Since this connection i5 incorrect, the traffic study was revised to reflect
the correct roadway network. Due to our time constraint. the analysis was limited to the
necessary tables and trip generation data.
The traffic analysis used the same distribution as the 1990 traffic study and relocated the
SW Congress Boulevard project trips to Woolbright Road. Please find enclosed tables 1
through 6 which provide the existm, conditions. trip generation. growth rate analysis and
future conditions with th.:~ redistribution of traffic. The project trips addressed where those
over the 1988 approval (77 smile family Units). As you can see from Table 5. all of the
roadways within the impact area meet the level of service (LOS) standards.
In addition to the LOS analysis, I prepared a driveway analysis to reflect a change in the
driveways. Figure 1 provides the daily, AM and PM peak driveway volumes and the project
volwnes at Knuth Road and Woolbright Road. If Knuth Road is not extended to the north.
based on the projected driveway volumes, a right turn lane would be needed at the driveway
to the residential site. If however, Knuth Road is exended to the north, this right turn lane
would not be needed. The projected Tara Oaks volumes at the intersection of Kuth Road and
Woolbright road are not significant, but do indicate the need Cor an exclusive southbound to
eastbound left turn lane. Please call me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
i ONNE ZIE~~TANTS.INC.
ce. Mr. William. D. Cavanaugh, FPOf City of Boynton Beach
Ms. Susan Prillaman. Pulte Home Corporation
Mr. William. Hukil, P.E, Engineering Department. City of Boynton Beach
Ms. Marcie Tinsley. Kilclay & Associates
Sgt. Marlin Harris, Police Department. City of Boynton Beach
TraffIC Engineering and Planning
SEP-12-199S 16:14 YZT""-"F I I'EL I NES P.03
TABLE 1
TARA oAKS PUD
EXlSllNG (1994.5) DAILY TRAFFIC coNomONS
11-Sep-95
1994.5
'OF "0" ACT Vie 1994.5
ROArNtIAY FROM TO LANES CAP TRAFFIC RATIO l.OS
GOLF RD MILlTARYTR CONGRESS AVE 2l 13.400 5.881 0.44 B
CONGRESS AVE 1..Q5 21. 13,400 10,117 0.76 C
WOOLBRIGtfT RD WEST LAWRENCE RD 21. 13,400 7,718 0.58 B
LAWRENCE RD KNUTH RD 4LD 29,400 15,732 0.54 B
KNUTH RD CONRESS AVE 41.0 29,400 15.732 0.54 B
CONRESSAVE ~ 4LO 29,400 28,941 0.9'2 D
LAWRENCE Ave WOOI,..8RIGHT RD BOYNTON BEACH BLV 2L 13,400 5.170 0.39 B
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD Ol.D BOYNl'ON RD 2l 13.400 10.911 0.61 C
BOYNTON BEACH B\.V EL CLAIR RANCH RD MILITARY '!'RAIL 6L.D 45,000 31,071 0.69 B
MILrfARYTRAlL LAWRENCE RD 6LD 45,000 28,117 0.62 B
LAWRENCE RD CONGRESS AVE 61.0 45,000 30,940 0.6S B
CONGRESS AVE EAST 6l.D 45,000 :29,135 0.85 B
OLO BOYNTON RO MILITARY TRAIL LAWRENCE RD 4LD 29,400 10,990 0.37 B
LAWRENCE RD CONGRESS AVE 4lD 29,400 11,952 0.41 6
CONGRESS AVE SOVNTON BEACH f1LVD WOOLBRIGHT RD 5LD 45,000 29.091 0.65 B
WOOLBRIGHT RD GOLF RD 8LD 45,000 29,545 0.86 B
GOLF RD SOUTH 6l.D 45,000 27,698 0.e2 6
EL CLAIR RANCH RD BOYNTON BEACH BLVO WOOLBRIGHT RD 21. 13,400 7,008 0.52 B
TABLE 2
TARA OAKS PUD
!)CISTING (1994.5) pEAK HOUR TRAFFIC CONDmONS
PEAK 1,994.5
,OF LOS PEAK VlC
ROfID/IIA.Y FROM TO LANES "0" HOUR RATIO LOS
GOLF RO MILITARV TR CONGRESS AVE 2L 1.220 533 0.44 B
CONGRESS AVE I.Q5 2L ',220 921 0.75 C
WOOLBRIGHT RD WEST LAWRENCE RD 2L 1,220 702 0.58 B
LAWRENCE RD I<NUTH RD 4lD 2,670 1,432 o.~ B
KNUll'4 RD CONRESS AVE 4LD 2.810 1.432 0.54 B
CONRESS A.VE 1-85 4l.D 2,670 2,452 0.9'2 D
LAWRENCE AVE WOOLBRIGHT RD BOYNTON BEACH BLVD 2L 1.220 470 0.39 B
BOYNTON BE:ACH BLVD OLD BOYNTON RO 2L 1,220 9lil3 0.81 C
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD EL ClAIR RANCH RD MILITARY ~A1L 6\.D 4.100 '1..827 0.69 a
MILITARY TRAIL LAwRENCE RD 6LD .,100 ',559 0.62 B
LAWReNCE RD CONGRESS AVE eLD 4,100 2,816 0.69 B
CONGRESS AVE eAST 8LD ",100 2.651 0.65 B
OLO BOYNTON RD MILITARY TRAIL LAWRENCE RD 4\..0 2,870 1.000 0.37 B
LAwRENCE RO CONGRESS AVE 4LD 2,670 1,089 0.41 B
CONGRESS AVE BOVNTON BEACH BLVD VVOOLBRIGtfT RD 6LD 4,100 2,647 o.eei B
WOOLBRIGHT RO GOLFRD 6LD 4.100 2.689 0.66 B
GOLF RO SOUTH 6LC 4,100 2,521 0.e1 B
EL CLAIR RANCH RD ~NTON BEACH BLVD WOOLBRIC'JHT RD 2L 1.220 638 0.52 B
SEP-12-1995 16:14
YZT'" "FlNELlt-ES
P.134
TABLE 3
TARA OAKS PUD
TRIP GENERATION RATES
1~
AM PEAK TRIP
RATES
LAND USE
RESIOENTIALJMF/APT
RESIDENTIAL-SF
CHURCHlSF
ITE
COOE
ADT
TRIP RATES
TOTAL
PERCENT
ENTER EXIT
PM)-I~IKI'"
RATES
TOTAL
PERCENT
ENTER EXIT
220
210
560
7 0.491 *(X)+3.391
10 LNTE.867*LNX...o.39
9.32 0.74
17
26
64
53 LNT=.928*LNX-O.11
74 lNT=.902*LNX+O_52
36 0.72
68 32
65 35
54 46
SOURCE: INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS, TRIP GENERATION, 5TH EDITION
SOURCE: PALM BEACH COUNTY IMPACT FEE ORDlNANCE- ACT
TABLE 4
TARA OAKS PUD
TRIP GENERATION
ACT AM PEAK TRIPS PM PEAK TRIPS
LAND USE SIZE TRIPS TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT
RES I OENTIAL/M FJAPT 192 1,344 98 17 81 117 79 37
CHURCHlSF 20,000 186 15 9 5 14 8 7
RESIDENTIAL SF - VESTED 77 770 64 17 48 S5 66 30
PROPOS eo PROJECT (MF PLUS CHURCH): 1.530 112 2S ee 131 87 44
TOTAL LESS VESTED SF: 760 48 9 39 46 32 14
SEP-12-1995 16:15
YZT"'''FlNELlNES
P.0~
TAflU! 5
TARA OAl<S PuO
PROJECTED AVERAGE CAILYlRAFFlC CONDITIONS
12-Sep-1l5
03:10:21 PM
"Of'
l.OS 1994.15 1999 1m
'V AOT aAcKGR AAOJeCl' TOrAL
PERCENT
PROJECT
OF
ROArNJAY FROM TO LANE ~ "TRAFFIC TRIPS TRAFFIC LOS CAPACl'N
GOLF RC MIUTARYTR CONORESS AVE 2L 13,400 5,861 26<4 1-4 6,139 B 0.10
CONGRESS AVE 1-86 2l 13.400 1Q,117 -4SCI -40 10,813 C 0.30
WOOI...BRIGHT ~ WEST LAWRENCe AD 2L 13.<100 7,718 3<18 38 8,104 e 0.28
LAWRENCE RD KN\mI RD ..w 2S.400 15,732 708 -48 . 18,-488 B 0.18
KNUTH RC CQNAESS A~ 4LO ~.400 115,732 70g 714 17,155 . 2.43
CONRESS AV&. l~ 4LO 20,400 26,941 1,215 2311 28,3a!i 0 0.111
\,.AWR!:NCEAVE WOOlBRIGHT RD BOYNTON BEACH BLVD 2L 13.400 5.170 233 78 5.479 B 0.57
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD OLD BOYNTON RD 2L 13.400 10.911 492 38 11.441 C 0.28
SOYN'l'ON &&:Ar:H BLVD EL a.AIR RANCH RD MlUTARV TRAIL 6LD -45,000 31.071 1.401 30 32,502 B 0.07
MILITARY TRAIL LA'NRENCE RD 6LD -45,000 28.117 1.288 38 29,423 B 0.08
LAWReNCe RO ~ESS AVIi 151.0 45,000 3D,94O 1,395 . 44 . 32,379 S' 0_10
CONGRESS AVE EAST EiLD ~,OOO 20,135 1,314 64 30,1513 B' 0,1.
OLD BOVNTON RD MILITARY 'TRAIL LA'NRENCE RD 4lD 29,400 10,990 498 8 11,-493 B 0.03
LAWRENCE RD CONGRESS AVIi <41.0 29,400 11,962 !U9 8 12,509 B 0,03
CONGRESS AVE EIOYN'TON il$!ACH &II. vD woa.BRlCHT RD 6LD -45,000 29.091 1.312 290 30,692 B 0.64
WOOLBRIGHt'RD GOlF RD 8l.0 45,000 29,545 1,332 183 31,060 B 0.41
GOLF RD SOUT1-l 81.0 45,000 27,68B 1,249 127 29,074 B 0.28
I;L ClAIR RANCH RC BOYNTON BEACH BLVD WOOlBRIGHT'RD 2L 13.400 7,006 318 8 7,329 B 0.08
TABLE 8
TARA OAKS PUC
FVT\JRE (1999) F'e,AK I<<JI.M TMFFIC CONOITIONS
1998 1998
PEAK 19114.5 PKHR PKHR TOTAL
'OF LOS PEAK SACI(GR ~Cl' PEAK 101Ft
Fl.oAr::iNAV FR M TO HOUR OR TRI 'rF!AFJl'IC l.OS
GOLF RO MILITARYTR CONGRESS AVE 2L 1,220 533 24 2 560 Ii
CONGRESS AVE 1-96 :lL 1,220 821 42 7 Slt;ll e
WOOLBAIGHt'RD weST LAWRENCE RD 2L 1,220 702 32 7 7-41 B
LAWRENCE FlO KNUTH RC 4LD 2,070 1,432 65 a 1,504 B
KNU'TW FlD OONRESS AVE 4..D 2,870 1,432 65 123 1,819' B
CONRESS AVE 1-95 ....0 2,670 2,-452 111 -41 2,603 0
LAWRENCE AVE WOOlBRIGHTi'm BOYN1'ON ~ 2L 1,220 470 21 13 506 El
aoVNrON BEACH OLD BOYNTON AD 2l 1,2:10 !iI!I3 4S 7 1,044 C
BOYNTON BEACH EL CLAIR RANCH MII.ITAR'Y' TRAIL et.D -4,100 2,827 127 5 2,960 Ii
MIUTp,RV TRAIL LAWRENCE AD lILD 4,100 2,559 115 7 2,681 B
LAWRENCe RO CCl/'ok1RESS AVE 8LD -4,100 2,11C1 . 127 8 2,950 B
CONGRESS AVE EAST GlC 4,100 2,651 120 11 2,782' Iii
OLD BOYNTON A MIUTARYTRAIL I.AWRENC1i llIe 4LD 2,870 1,000 45 1,046 B
LAWRENa: RD CONGRESS AVE 4LD 2.870 1,089 ~ 1,139 B
CONaRESS AVE BOYNTON BEACH YVoot..BRIGHT RD 6LD -4,100 2.647 119 50 2,1117 El
WOOl.9RIGI-IT RD GOLF RD SLD -4,100 2,689 121 32 2,841 B
GOLF RD SOUTH IU1 4,100 2,521 114 22 2,656 B
EL Cl.AtR ~ BOYNTON BEACH WOOLJIRIGHT RD 2L 1,220 831 211 1 668 B
SEP-12-1995
~,
16:15
.....
Q
q:
~
..
~
i
......
--
-
C>>
t:..
d
0::
:I:
.....
::l
~
.....
Q
lIC(
~
r
...
-
~
-
Cf)
-
-
--
~
U')
.....
ex)
I.
J
-
U') N
-
J
YZT-~FINELIt-ES
r
U')
::::::::::::::::::::::~::::::::~::::::::::::::::::::
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:::::::::::
..'.......'"........."......'...........................
:~:;:~: ~ :;: ~:~:;: ~:; :~:~:~:;:~:::: ::::: ~:~ ~ ~:~:~:~:~:
.......................~..............
::::::ii'j'j,,::::::r.o:;:;r.-r:::::::::::::::
:::::. ..:::::;:;::::~::S::::::::::::::
:::::::::::::::::::::::;::=:::=:::::::::::::::::::::
.."....... I" .........................-...
;~;~r~~m~;~m~;~~~m~~t~;~;m;;j;mmm
~1~1j~ jjjj~~l1~~ ~~l~l ~~~~1~l~~~~~~~~j~~~~j~~ ~l~~~ 1 ~l~
Illt"111:
~ j~~~~~~1~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~l~~~~~~~j~~~~~~~~~~~jj ~~jj~~ j~
......._.......I/lI..................:.~.;...
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::r ~.::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::=::::: Cl :
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .
~Immmtmmmlm ~ ~
:~:;: ~:;:;:~:;:; :~:~:~:;:~: ~:~ :~: ~
".........,..........,.......,.... ,^ ..
:::::::::::::::::::::::=:::::::::: U J :
.................................. ~
~~~ttm~m~m~~~mI~j <C
:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. 0
:;:~:~;;l::::::::::~;g:;': ~
":':~;:::::::':':~:: '-<t
.......................... ~
..................................
:':.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:':':':'::~::: """
................................. L.L.
1':':":.:.:.:.:.:-:.:'::=::::::::: ~
.'...................... ....
.:::::::::::::=:::::::::::::::::::
:..:.:..:.:::.:.:::::::::::::::::::: L.....: .
....,.......,....,...... r- ..
:;:;:;:;:;:~:~:;:~:;:~:~:;:~:~:~:;:~ ~.::
..I............'.............'...~:~,~;~,.
t~f~~~t~mj;~;~;;;;;1j1jmm~m~m~;~;
I..,.......'......................~....:.:':.:.:.:
::::t:::::::::!:;~~:~;~;~:::::::::::;
.........................~.'........,.,..
i~ilfJII
......1..... .... ... .. . . . . . .. . .
. .. ;........................................
d) cD
E E
cD = =
E c; c;
= > >
~ ... ...
= =
0 0
~ J: J:
'n; ~ ~
C ell ell
CP CP
0 16 0.. 0..
'0 :E ~
Z .- 0-
W ~
e" ~
W
...J
--
('I) -,,,,'
...-
-
It)
J
_."
-
"lit
--
........
L..
-
-ct'N
<"ICXJ
-
'a~ l.HE)I~8100M
P.0.6
(IJ
....
z
w
~
w
Q>
::)0
a.~
c/)z
~~~
O~:J~
I-~
o:::LL
<(~
0:::0
<t:::t:
t-~
a..
w
I-
CiS
. I
.... ~ ~~
IoU .!i
-e-<g
N ~ ~:t
IoU !:i ~ t
i~l!
o81!
~~II
t- z
!
"
.
~
TOTAL P.06
9
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-379
,~
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning & zoning Director
M~am ~ukill, P.E.
ttlWf Eng1.neer
FROM:
DATE:
September 29, 1995
RE:
TARA OAKS - DECELERATION LANES
We have reviewed the Weisberg September 22 letter and find his
logic reasonable, particularly with regard to the southbound left
turn lane into Tara Oaks from Knuth Road. A right turn
(northbound) lane into Tara Oaks from Knuth Road also is desirable.
Neither has much value until the ~link~ is constructed, but both
will be desirable at that time.
WVH:ck
C:TARAOAKS,LN
ruuu w ~ml
il i DEG I 3'. II ~ )
'" '_I ' !, L,j
RECREL_ _ION & PARK MEMORANDUM #~- ":78
TO:
PLM!NI~IG P,,~JD
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director",-1,QW~!G PEPT.
Kevin 1. Hallahan, Fnrester/Environmentalist f~ tt
Tara Oaks - Master Plan
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
December 13, 1995
The applicant should place the following comments on the plans landscape sheets:
1. All gopher tortoises which are on the site shall be relocated off site (by permit). Otherwise
the applicant shall come into the City of Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Department for
a master plan modification.
2. The tree survey and tree management plan is submitted for Phase I only as identified on the
master plan and the same requirement will be completed in the future for Phase II (church
parcel).
KH:ad
xc: Mike Haag, Zoning/Site Administrator
SEP-29-95 FRI 09i~3 AM Q~K PBINT
813 223 3828
P.12l2
C\;
TO:
TltRU:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PLANNlNG AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
HSMORANDUM NO. 95-541
Agenda Memorandum for
October 2, 1995 City commiss1on Meeting
Carr1e Parker
city Manaver
Tambri J. Heyden
Planninq and zoning Director
Michael E. Haag
zoning and site Administrator
september 26, 1995
Tara oaks ~~hn~d----crrri t de-,;ele-pmeJ\o&.}- - HPMD 95-001
, {p.l hni l.l~thnl of the il)(t".s4-e-a.~~~.s....s.Q..\.1.l..e\l.a.l'd,
..a..1.tf1rat1o.n ,of th@ J..o.c.a:tioIt ~nd t...ype of recrQilt1-Qn-;-^'-a
cltaD~ in ~----eype-~ from apart.f\eftt-s to -tvwnn011~-~rS,
~.t.alH:-ieMeflt of Pt.!,t. JmeteJ. lA:1~fer ~illiements IilnQ,.dwe:-l-l-in-g
dB'1 t: sQtba"" a~d .stab-lidl a pa:teel ~ ine bettor_ell the UQW---
..t ounheu8 e lilt" e;f-4!!!lQ t .An d ~he QAU <UL.1U:~l).8I,t*- "'
(^ J I .. ':.J.. +r.f't).f/ a~,J AMI!-.-
!./f\..IO'_-o"'-'}(..../"""-'" tl,<<R~ /' ~ j&>,,~J.^, I
tu'--''\l9''1(. > "
NATURE OF REQUEST
Kilday and Associates, ag8nt for pulte Home corporatiOllLtontract
pllrohaaer of ~ pl.'OI~erty owned by Bill Winche5tewfLs reqaJstir.g to _
modify the Tara oaka{.t{!'ater plan. The 20.16 aOl"e:~roject prfiilP01HHl..-p~eVI$tlsly
for: X 192 mul ti-fa~it.Y apartment" unit5 and a 20.....9.Q/'? square fo~t ~o
seat)chUl.-ch with ~ open 5pace/-and- retention ~is ~oned P D a
located at the northea6t corner of Woolbright Road and Knuf RQ d
extended {see Exhibit "1\" - location map). The requested c es
are limited to the 14.470 acre residential portion of the pun and
are as follOWS: (see Exhibit na" - letter of request and proposed
\lIas ter plan):
Reduce the number of access points into the project from
two (2) to one (1).
~J.....~ lr~~ :11 ~tZ. ,si ;J,L t:Jf.e Pod... I (re s/dttrt:/1'a.1 'lJ~ L:7/~
.Egta 11 a rceIfpro rty -i-iHe bet\leen- .t-he eh\:l - It-
p1."oper-t.y end the "-,,p.r-Q.p98ed:-~"t'eg idE! 11 Littl--~Qj ee:t. As
,p.ce-v-i:-ons:nr 6 ta tea the '---PUD" ~t-ai:ns----2-Q.-:-l-';,-ae-!."e-s :--'Th'E"- . ,
'1*'GfIosed !"filS iden t.ial pr-o..j.act.--WBuld" con~td1l"""*-;-4.::J-O.--,ae-t'-e9u
, 'Ji _ --al~ the :h~~lt pt"epe.rty would c.oul:>a-iH 5 5,g, ac..r~$..
Hi fd~~,______'--::: rtJn, ~ - ~ Lens' -l(; 14.,4 70 6-(!~&.n,
.r: f t iJ-. 4. Change thQ type of units from 192 multi-family apartmcmts
11 _.{ <:;. to 2~wo-GtOf'Y buildings with a total of 192 townhouse
L (:/1 unitl'f:' Eetabliah the follow1nq building Bud site
regulations for the townhouse unit~:
,~jJ1,.....l
/JY-l"
1. Omit the extension of S.W. Congress Boulevard to Knuth
Road.
2,
.
... .
Building setbacks (individual lots); front 10 feet,
rear 15 teet, s1ae (end unit) 3 teet, s1de
(Interior unit) 0 feet. Note minimum bUilding
separation is 15 feet.
peol setbacks; pools not allowed.
Screen ~lOS"U,re setbacks; shall comply with
buildin~etba~k~,
v{c lit.~ ~rj4?'"----"-'---"'perImeterQ~} Increase the nOl'th sf~~' from
llH~ ptb'^ r+ ~v,e.- 20 feEl}: t~~ 40 feet. Please note the following
J. -lt~j:5 t.ilDVil. ~.s-etha\.-1!.tM'tnain as previously approved; 40 foot
+0 Lt\.. $-t. i . , ",{'-Cl(/'/i,:1c ~ , __
t't ;.fgc~"~~5-kvflr;,,,- bJ~g,,.1 (f c1h~.-:</tJkf.1- f!~~ lL_...YL 01 (ftJlJv(..(
.. [<., ~ 1- 0-t. -t(?t~;: bJ(J-.!j Ca-r~rv-.,$ I 'j ,
SEP-29-95 FRI 09:34 AM QUIK PRIN~.
813 2:?3 3828
P.03
/:)'
(~
~ JfbY
" ~
~;~ . _L
front "nd rear. :ok and JiDC 20 foot f..ptl~~,^.GidQ
",eeth4...Jt-; AlSO note the perimeter '&$~IIHl~t8k~
precedenCe over bu11din9 setbacks for individl"sl
lots.
Minimum living area - 750 ISquare feet (p...opoglid
un! t slze5 - 913 squ8);"e feet, 1,079 square fOQt
an~ 1,082 square feat)
~~*'r
5.
Building height - Remains as originally approved
(30 fee~wo stories)
Lot area - 1,260 square feet (end unit) and 1,050
square feet (interior unit'
'vaft/
Change the type and location Of~ recreation amenitiea
fromiQ) clubhouse, pool, jogglng trail, picnic area end
fish!6g dock to pool, cabana (restrooms for pool), sand
volley ball 'court 'r' ~,ogg1ng tral1..... and gazebo Q~_~ar~~m 'r'"'.'/'~,.'-:'
ameni ty (: ,{,t., ,-: r-tJj~!f ' C.-- i~; Pt.(l~'1C" f7.4'f/ j}.,., l-';"';"" {,!, i :' 1; .' f, J./J \
'~.,- I" ',' ' ~:~,k>0.::::-....v ' IJJ~,I.!lJ'. ;;
Establish a 25 foot wide,Mudscape buffer along the north
property I lt~ jfj?ellfiIB'hq the' east property l1ne and
10 foot, W!d~lol\~st (Knuth Road: P~OP~~l!ne of the
project. An open space and ~tention border the
south property of the residential. '.f,'Ld:
BACKGROUND
6.
On June 21, 198e, the City Commission approved a master plan and
l-e~on1I1lJ of the Tara Oaks pun property from R1AAA (single-family
residential) to pun with a land use intensity (LUt) of 4.00 for 78
8inqle~fam11y, d8ta~hed units.
On Del;!elnbel" 1S t 1990, afte~w by the Departanent of Community
of Affairs (DCA) and ~- bject:l.ons, the City Commission
approved ordinances for a land use element amendment that chang&d
the land use classification of the property from Lo". D91\sity
Residential to Hedium Oenrsity Residential and rezoning of the'
propel-ty fI'om PUD (LUI:4) to pun (LUI;S) with a master plan for 19,,!L'?
"
mUlti-family units, private recreation and a 20,000 square foot
church. The adopted comprehensive plan amendment WaS transmitted
to DCA on December 19, 1990, along wlth responses to OCA'~
objections. In F~bruary 1991, the DCA issued a notice of intent to
find the comprehensive plan amendment 1n comp11ance.
tt9tJ
The applicat10ns were submitted undee palm Beach Coullty' s current
tra ic performance standards ordinance~~ owever prior to the
~ffective date of the City's COllcur-ren allagement ordinance.
Therefore, concurrency certification for raffia and concurrency
exemption for drainage and neighborhood parks were granted with the
1990 approval.
On June 2, '1992, the t:'.'{y Commission approved a request to allow
construction of the s~~ portion (adjacent to the church parcel)
of Knuth Road, prior to preliminary plat approval of the property.
Tho rQason for submitting th~ r~qu~st was to ensure the Church of
JQSUS Christ of Latter Day Saints' purchase of thQ church parcel
within the PUD, which took place on ~un9 26, 1992.
On June 16, 1992, the City Commission granted a one (1) year time
extension that extended the p...oject's June 18: 1992 expiration date
to June 17, 199.3. No application fOl" e~ejlei2..~ w~f91Ade since the
June 1993 e2':pin'ltion, until ..Iv J~~W~:ft~~ Ml"t'ch was filed
in November 1994; a period of one year" and five months_ ~l<> l~
'I l-.Mw lJ,-_.d. .I.'".J.. - -LMJ...Lu~....ly-.. ~J.t~li~1o.a.-.
on April S, 1993, the C1 ty Comm1ssion approved a master plal1
SEP-29-95 FRI 09:35 AM QUIK PR~NL
- ~
813 223 3828
(~4
modification. for the tara Oaks fUD to amend the cOlldition of
approval which requtred the construotion of Knuth Road to be tled
entirely to the Tara oaka pun. The approval of the master plan
modification ~11owed the conl"itruetion responsibility for Knuth Road
to be share.d by the Knuth Road pen. ~oa-diYe,....., . J
~irP. t i ~~I.l-IJWft'tkll
1995 'the C1 ty COlillnilu ion 8PP'r(wed :a:-~t.: ~. ~1!!!Il( ens on. ,
The Clpproval ~~ . ~ v-~-t-' IU".!:!/
----'~ i ne t
~ Jl\t J 1 ) e
~. .' / 1 " 0.:3 - n 'Va .
C) ~1ttl1~) -to ,-(,"Ie- ~pJIL-r J...-~I /c,tL--~+/~' tlte/a.-t?j?Yz/~.J Wtt..,S a..{r;;D
W}~l~1-1 P'Jt.e,,<,/ l(../)p}L--H\..i-.-(1.-:f)f.)I; .1--1 r i~.(L4h~tr~9/tl.4 afl,p/l..Y/"~
Chapter Z. 5, Iplanned pttlt aviHop n, J'; J h& eL
development reg\.\lat1ons I5tet-ell that change. in planned unit '.". t -'I
developments shall be processed as follows: #'<.. '111€51
~f ~I,-c.t J..
Sect ion 12. changes in pllms. (0<" S'''1.'' "T'
<-:>'(.6 , t".J,I)r.," oS
vc..~ ~I
IIChanges 1n plans approved aa t!. part of the zoning to pun may c:y.:..
be permitted bY the Planning and zoning- Bou'd '-lpon applillatioll ,....2f~/,j
filed by the developer cr hi~ succeaeore in interest, prior to .~
the expiration of the pun clceaification, but only [after] a
finding that any su~h change or change5 are in accord with all
regula tlons in effect when the change, or ehangee are rQCJl\Qstl~d
and the intent and purpose of the comprehensive plan in. aff9ct
at the time of the propose~ change. 5ubst6ntial changes shall
be proposed as tor a new app11cat1cm of PUP zonin9. The
determination of What conStitutes a substantial change sh611
be within the sole discret10n of ~he c1ty Commission. Non-
substantial changes as determined by the C1ty Cornmis5ion in
plans shall not extend the expiration Of the e1ghteen month
approval for the PUD classification."
t\NALYSIS
staff has l-e.viewed this request for consistency Wit!l the PUP
dE:!velopment standards, and the intent and purpose of planned unit
developments as stated in the following sections of Chapter 2.5 of
the city's land development regulations:
SQction 1. Intent and purpose.
!'A PlcU1l1ed Unit Developmaut District (PUn) is established. It
is intended that this district be utili~ed to promote
efficient lmd economical land use, 1mpro'V9d amenities,
appropriate and harmonioue varietr 1n physical davelopment,
creatl ve design, improved 1 i ving environment, ol-deJ:ly and
economical development in the city, and the protection of
adjacent and existing alld future city development. 'rhe
<11strlct is eu1 table for development, redevelopment &lld
conservation of land, water and other resource5 of the city.
Regulations tor Planned unit Developments are intended to
ar;complish the purposes of zoning, subdiVision regulations and
other applicable City regulations to the same deg~ee that they
are intended to control development on a lot-by-lot basis. In
vie'tf' of the substantial ptlblic advantages Of planned unit
development, it is the intent of PUD regulations to promote
and encourage development in this form where tracts suitahle
in size. location and character for the uses and structures
proposed are to be planned and developed as unified and
coordinated units.
Section 9. Internal PUD standards.
B. INTERNAL LOTS Jum FRONTAGE. Within the boundaries of the
pun, no minimum lot size or minimum yards shall be
~equired; provid~d, how~vQr, that pun frontage on
dedicated public roads shall observe front yard
requirements in accordance with the zoning district the
SEP-29-95 FRI 09:39 AM QUUK PRINT
813 2~3 3828
P.08
~ ~ .-.J.. ·
- -
~~'~~~
~~ .~.,----,-_...__."- .~'-'-'-""'-~-~-
~----.--~., --~, ~_.
CTit$erI-' tl-rfe.v 1tl.-S~_Yt &/~~5u.,~ / (h\.~
Vw1f aw>>'- ~ ~~~ ~;tAd
.~~ ./AU~.~ ~.~~~
;tr- p7~-uA~- ~ ~' ~/.k ./
~';~/?6G ~~ :Mu~~~
f'hv-, ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~./fI/V tL
rl;ft, ..#-' · · 7 ~ - t!j; - ~ · "'""
~.. Jl.A/~ *r7J - A "I r .& . , .aL. -+-//.. 5' tv
6~ .~ ~~ 1)(......;:cr ,~ ....... ..
~~-v.~~_'~
~r~~.~~oI-
.* ,~'~"'(f d-J r:t:yd"~<1'tf-~J (~~&
{f19-.-u,>vV~ ~ ~8 ~p~J~.I.(J
"'- ~~{h~ ~~fM-~.
a.d;r~.d&V~~~;~:dlf
ei44.t1-4/ ~ ~.A~ ~~~ ~.(.~
.~;~~ /iA{UIJ ;17-, ~~JI.J ~ ~f~
+ t'~ p J:L~ri-_AuL ''-~..~~
.r~ ~~pr-~u.u~~
~~ . ~~~(J,n:rtL
(l/X./' ~ t/~,? ~ ~~~~~~
~ ~ ." ~ ~ c:t~~~~a~~:
.~ .....kV~ ~~ /?~
~~u-r:: ~~ ~ ~~l;(, ~_..-~~~ '
~~'fd~ ;th.-.~~.
tLku.- .~ ~~ .Xtr" t.J~~
.(~) .f ~0--:UJ~ ~~_~~';
<fIId'~~ ~ ~~/;btt:i-
~~. ,s. IU. /~A ..A~-Av--l ~~-t)~,
, ~'7~ ~~~
fI"~)
SEP-29-95 FRI 09:39 AM QUJK PRINT
813 223 3828
P.09
'1!J
~~~~~~:7~ ·
~.) j6. '-- - -AL* - ~ W~ -
~ ~./ t9f 4',~ ~-Ir>~,
~<tX~~.~~ ~
~~~ ,,1> b--~~ h. ~
~~,,41.~ ~ ~;;'l<<ft,
-"
. .~ ~v " '" ~LR.../ J,' ? ~ &I' .., /_, ~'Io
I~~ 0-0 ~~
'~,' . -!:t'5)ur~LordiJJ1/L' ~J.lJ'Ao-.n-
<-i!.u-q.,-=,_'!'-'~~ ~ ~4df~ ~ ~
~h~"c&u;k-~,
.~~+~~~
;~.~~~~~
R/t.. ....' d~e."L{.4jL~/ ~..
-0 d. ...
. :t ~~-('-'~~
~~~~~./~~~t.
~.~, . ~~~
~ · ")('d~--;;U~ ~
c:~ , / . / ,~
~~. ;Ci-p~ ~ . -?d:~.;&~
P ,~~~~d-- ~ 4 1L~
- ~I' ' ~M.J.." , ~ ~ ~t1n-~.d ~
.~r.~/J}'r-.,..'fh-j6.fd~ ' ~ ", , ~ ~'~~ ~~7 __~1!~'
~/7,te~k/~' ~ WfJ~
,~~. .
f.fh~~Y;~~4~~
.~ ~~./~,~~-?V
~tvLU.~ ' (:?-f..,.
SEP-29-95 FRI 09:40 AM QUIK PRINT
813 223 3828
P.10
hjf.f)
/~YFlif~-~if}j:; ~, ~ik~~~
~ '1 I *D /1 g
4t~-v-d-/z../.~,~ " 5i1iii', ~~. ~~~
b "(), Ir t i~ ~ ,on ~L.C (J , c,fy
Il:'~~. ',-~- ~_b'
--f1J -Ikc MIJtty~ ~ /u,...epf;~ . ~~ Pf- Jf&A?t~ &/- ~
,~flj cd::;tPt~ ~ ~&~ ~ ~r?~
-/u:~ ~~.. ~
~~~~~-rT~ ~~. ZRet/ ~~~ .. '
;iJ2~~U'~.tT ~ ~~ tf,~~~7f tG ~
~', ~1TnU ;t:.JU- ~itI B-1... ~ &/L-~~
. tf : ,p? J If
-4--; 'hu~4L.J;t;? ~ ~ ~ ~
~~d/l~A/ ~ X~~ ~ ~ 0..-0 ~
II d..h+ ~~JJ~~ _ 6"'0 10 If"e-M 2-tW\ f" 4
.) V .--~.
{O,V1 D,
,~~/J;~"" ~ft~,~ ~~/(1~ ~ },J3h~
f ~ ~ / r.x;..r-
~ ~ ~~tf;wur-w.~,ifJ'~ #L:
~,Vn~-~ f'~~ ,sf ~~~~~trtti~
;th..- fe.(tJj.A_~ ~ ~ ~J -j-..IlL,.A4<JJ/A- ML:
~#f.~~~~/--
,()e~{..AL..r ~~ ~ .4J~~ ~
I ~ -.~-.- , ~
.~~&~~P-~/ .
fl"l.R~ of ~ (/..di..--. ~L ~
~. 2f~" ~~ ~.yr- ~d;-a~~~~
, ,~ ~:ti;;e-- ~)u4/ P/ ~~~ ~~}
.~lf!~~~41<M!L~.~~
, ~p-~~~-~.~;~
;tfiv~ ~~"N',~~-rk_~
ti-hu:t ~~~.
~