AGENDA DOCUMENTS
VIII. DEVELOPMENT PLANS
E
cc: Plan, Dev, Util
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPART
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-727
Agenda Memorandum for
December 19, 1995 City Commission Meeting
TO:
Carrie Parker
City Manager
Tambri J. HeYden~
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
DATE:
December 15, 1995
SUBJECT:
Tara Oaks - MPMD # 95-007
Master Plan Modification - access, recreation, unit type
and use acreage
At the advice of the city attorney, please place the above-
referenced request back on the City Commission agenda (for December
19, 1995) under Development Plans.
INTRODUCTION: You will recall that on November 7, 1995, the
Commission, with a 3-2 vote, made a determination of substantial
change for the above request (detailed further in the attached
Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-654). You will
also recall that the Commission made several recommendations to
guide the Planning and Development Board in the action the Board
would take subsequent to the Commission's November 7, 1995 action.
To this end the Planning and Development Board, on December 12,
1995 voted, 7-0, to approve this request, subject to the attached
staff comments in Exhibit C. These staff comments are not the
staff comments that were forwarded to Commission on November 7th,
because submittal of a revised master plan to reflect Commission
recommendations, and an additional review by the Technical Review
Committee, necessitated refinement of the original staff comments.
RECOMMENDATION: The city attorney advises that since the
Commission's action of making all Planning and Development board
decisions advisory, this request must go back to the Commission for
final disposition. The city attorney states that this is
especially necessary since he believes the Board's action regarding
the construction of Knuth Road is contrary to the Commission's
statements at the November 7, 1995 meeting. Therefore, below is a
list of all the comments in Exhibit C to which the applicant
objected at the December 12, 1995 Planning and Development Board
meeting. These comments have been revised to reflect the agreement
between the applicant and the Board. (Wording has been taken from
the city clerk's minutes of the Board meeting.)
Comment 4 (revised) - Place the following note on the master
plan: "Completion of Knuth Road fronting the PUD must be
completed prior to the first certificate of occupancy. The
balance of Knuth Road, northerly to its current terminus to
the north, must be completed prior to the issuance of the last
certificate of occupancy or within two years, whichever occurs
first."
It is believed 'that the Commission desired all of Knuth Road (from
woolbright Road to the existing Knuth Road terminus) to be
completed prior to the first residential certificate of occupancy,
not postponed to two years after plat approval. Also, this
revision allows phasing, but does not address bonding.
Comment 13 (revised) - Submit a tree survey with the tree
management plan for the entire site, excluding the church
parcel.
~
..".,
Attached Recreation and Park Memorandum #95-578 affirms that this
revision is acceptable. However, in comment 1 of this new
memorandum, the Forester modifies comment 12 to read as follows
(the Planning and Development Board did not have the benefit of
this new memorandum) :
Comment 12 (revised) Submit a copy of the Gopher tortoise
relocation permit from Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish
Commission as it is assumed that all Gopher tortoises on site
shall be relocated. If all cannot be relocated, a master plan
modification shall be filed.
Comment 18 (revised) Modify the submittal to include a
survey of the entire PUD and renumber all sheets
chronologically. The survey may be older than six months, but
not older than the survey processed for the 1990 rezoning.
This revision is acceptable to staff.
Comment 24 - deleted by the Planning and Development Board.
This deletion is acceptable to staff.
Comment 31 (revised) - A separate site plan review shall be
required for the block wall and landscape screening required
adjacent to the project and located north of the L.W.D.D. L-25
Canal. This shall not hold up unconditional sign-off approval
of a rectified master plan.
This revision is acceptable to staff.
Comment 32 (revised) - Due to the close proximity of the
basketball court to the on-site and adjacent residential
units, it is recommended that a note be placed on the master
plan indicating that the basketball court will not be
illuminated. To lessen the adverse impact of the use of the
basketball court to the adj acent residences, it is also
recommended that 36" high (at time of planting) evergreen
shrub material, spaced five (5) feet on-center be installed
along the east property line to a distance of 20 feet north
and south of the length of the basketball court.
This revision is acceptable to staff.
Therefore, it is recommended that the Commission approve this
request, subject to the staff comments in Exhibit C, except for
comment 24, together with the revisions to comment 13, 12, 18, 31
and 32 as written above and subj ect to either endorsement of
comment 4 above or further revision to it as the Commission deems
necessary.
TJH:dim
Attachment
a:CCAgnda3.Tar
\g
TO:
Tambri Heyden. Planning & Zoning Director
Kevin J. Hallahan, ForesterlEnviromncntalist f& tf
Tara Oaks - Master Plan
PLANNING A"lD V/UI /
ZONING DEPT. \ , TV'-
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
December 13. 1995
The applicant should place the following comments on the plans landscape sheets:
1. All gopher tortoises which are on the site shall be relocated off site (by permit). Otherwise
the applicant shall come into the City of Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Department for
a master plan modification.
2. The tree survey and tree management plan is submitted for Phase I only as identified on the
master plan and the same requirement will be completed in the future for Phase II (church
parcel).
KH:ad
xc: Mike Haag, Zoning/Site Administrator
..,.
..,
6.A.l
TARA OAKS PUD
SUBDIVISION
Master Plan Modification
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-698
TO:
Chairman and Members
Planning and Development board
Tambri J. Heyden fJtJ
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
DATE:
December 8, 1995
SUBJECT:
Tara Oaks PUD - MPMD #95-007
Master plan modification - access, recreation, unit type
and use acreage
INTRODUCTION
Kilday and Associates, agent for Pulte Home Corporation - contract
purchaser of property owned by Bill Winchester, is requesting to
modify the previously approved (time extension also granted) master
plan for the Tara Oaks PUD, as described in the attached reports
(Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-541 and 95-597 in
Exhibit A). Tara Oaks is to be located at the northeast corner of
Knuth Road extended and Woolbright Road.
After staff review, requests for master plan modifications are
forwarded to the City Commission, prior to forwarding to the
Planning and Development Board, for a determination that the
changes requested are either substantial in nature or not
substantial in nature. This request went before the City
Commission on November 7, 1995, at which the Commission with a 3-2
vote, made a determination of non-substantial change and
recommended to the Planning and Development Board several
conditions (outlined below). The applicant presented a master plan
to the Commission which reflected these conditions, but it had not
been reviewed by staff. Therefore, prior to the November 14, 1995
Planning and Development meeting, staff was able to convince the
applicant to request postponement of his request before the Board
so that another staff review could be conducted. You will recall
that the Board, at their November meeting honored this request for
postponement to December 12, 1995.
CONCLUSION
Despite the premise on which the April 1995 master plan time
extension was granted, the extension of S. W. Congress Boulevard was
decided by the Commission to have been resolved in 1990 as not
being required and to terminate in a cul-de-sac constructed to city
standards. The Commission is recommending the following to the
Planning and Development Board:
1. All residential buildings shall be moved out of the former,
S . W. Congress Boulevard right -of -way (in order for there to be
room to do this without losing units all of the recreation
amenities planned for Pod 1 have been relocated to open space
Pod 2 on the latest revised master plan) ;
2. A cabana 'shall be replaced with an 800 square foot meeting
room building having bathroom facilities to be eligible for
half credit resulting in payment of the value of 1.44 acres of
land;
3. To compensate for the "weak" recreation amenities, a sixth
recreation amenity (a full court basketball court) shall be
provided;
4. Required parking spaces for each unit shall not be required to
~
.."",
be provided on the townhouse lot;
TO: Planning and Development Board
-2-
December 8, 1995
5. All turn lanes referenced in Planning and Zoning Department
Memorandum No. 95-597 shall be constructed;
6. A "Knox Box" shall be acceptable for police and fire emergency
access to the project. However, an unmanned security gate is
required at the project entrance;
7.
Revised unified control documents shall be
reflect the change from rental apartments
townhouses;
submitted to
to fee simple
8. Knuth Road shall be constructed in its entirety simultaneously
with construction of the townhouse units and prior to the last
certificate of occupancy being issued.
The latest master plan (see Exhibit B) reflects the above
Commission recommendations, except for items 5, 7 and 8. These
items are included in a new set of staff comments that have been
generated from review of the latest master plan. These comments
are in exhibit C and are recommended for approval.
TJH:dim
xc: Central File
A: TOaksPD
E X H I BIT
II A"
....
...,
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-654
TO: Chairman and Memc~rs
Planning and Development board
FROM: Tambr~ ~. HeYde~/~~
Planning and Zonin~ Dir~ctor
DATE: N)ve:nber 9, 1995
SUBJECT: Tara Jaks P~D - MPHD =95-007
Master plan modificaticn - access, recreaticn, unit type
and use acreage
INTRODUCTION
Kilday and Associates, agent for pulte Home Corporation - contract
purchaser of property owned by Bill Winchester, is requesting to
modify the previously approved (time extension also granted) master
plan for the Tara Oaks PUD, as described in the attached reports
(Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-541 and 95-597).
Tara Oaks is to be located at the northeast corner of Knuth Road
extended and Woolbright Road.
After staff review, requests for master plan modifications
forwarded to the City Commission, prior to forwarding to
Planning and Development Board, for a determination that
changes reques'ted are either substantial . in nature or
substantial in nature. This request went before the
Commission on November 7, 1995.
are
the
the
not
City
RECOMMENDATION
At the November 7, 1995 meeting the commission, with a 3 - 2 vote,
made a determination that the changes requested were not
substantial in nature and could be forwarded to the Planning and
Development Board for final disposition. Despite the premise on
which the April 1995 master plan time extension was granted, the
extension of s. w. Congress Boulevard was decided to have been
resolved in 1990 as not being required and to terminate in a cul-
de-sac constructed to city standards. Further, with their
determination, the Commission is recommending the following to the
Planning and Development Board:
1. All buildings shall be moved out of the former, S.W. Congress
Boulevard right-of-way (in order for there to be room to do
this without losing units some of the recreation amenities
planned for Pod 1 will have to be relocated to open space Pod
2 and will require a revised master plan);
2. A cabana shall be replaced with an 800 square foot meeting
room building having bath=oom facilities to be eligible for
half credit resulting in payment of the value of 1.44 acres of
land;
3. To compensate for the "weak" recreation amenities, a sixth
recreation amenity (a half court basketball court) shall be
provided;
4. ReqUired parking spaces for each unit shall not be required to
be prOVided on the townhouse lot;
5. All turn lanes referenced in Planning a~d ~oning Department
~emor3ndum No. 95-597 shall be constructed;
:J. ,!\ "rnox Eo::" shall be a'.:ceptable for :;Jollce and fh-e access to
the project;
TO: Planning and Development Board
-2-
November 9, 1995
7 .
Revised unified control
reflect the change from
townhouses;
documents shall be. s~bmitted to
rental apartMents to fee simple
8. Knuth Road shall be constructed in its entirety simultanecusly
with construction of the ~ownhcuse units and prior to the last
certificate of occupancy being is~ued.
In addition to the above, the Planning and Zoning Department
re,:ommends that the Board approve this request, subj ect to all
staff comments which are not in ccnflict with the above (Public
Works Department Memorandum No. 95-165, Engineering Divisicn
Memorandum No. 95-304, Building Division Memorandum No. 95-299 -
except comment 2 regarding parking, Fire Department Memorandum No.
95-346 WDC and Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-555
- except comments 8 and 10).
tjh
A:TOaksPD
xc: Central File
'WI
'WI'
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-597
Agenda Memorandum for
October 17, 1995 City Commission Meeting
FROM:
Carrie Parker
City Manager
Tambri J. Heyden .~
Planning and Zoning Director
TO:
DATE:
october 13, 1995
Tara Oaks pun - MPMD ~95-007
(Change in access, recreation, unit type and use
acreage)
Please be advised that the above-referenced item is on the table
for the october 17, 1995 Commission meeting agenda.
SUBJECT:
DESCRIPTION: A detailed description of this request is presented
in Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-541. You
will recall that at the last Commission meeting the applicant
requested that the Commission table this item to the October 17th
meeting. You will further recall that the reason for the request
to table was to allow time for the applicant to substantiate his
claim that the description of his request in the above-referenced
report, specifically to omit the extension of S.W. Congress
Boulevard to Knuth Road, was in error based on his belief that
the omission of this road was approved with the 1990 rezoning/
master plan for Tara Oaks.
Today the applicant plans to further research this issue by
viewing the files of the Planning and Zoning, Engineering and
utilities Departments, since to date there has been nothing found
which supports, with total certainty, the applicant's claim.
Attacped is a reduction of the master plan, showing a cul-de-sac
terminating S.W. Congress Boulevard rather than extension of the
road, which the applicant believes was approved in 1990 and
granted a time extension in April of this year. However, if
this is the master plan that was granted an extension, it
conflict. with the master plan staff presented to the Commission
in the backup for the time extension and conflicts with the
statements made by the applicant's traffic engineer in the
traffic report that was submitted with the time extension. If
staff's assumptions were incorrect (staff had no reason to
believe that they were incorrect after researching minutes and
files), it would have been appropriate and important to have
raised the issue at the time of the extension (the approval of
which spanned the course of five months between submittal of
extension and Commission approval). As evidenced by the current
staff recommendation against this road omission, had this isaue
been raised with the extension, staff's recommendation would have
reflected the same concerns currently expressed.
At best, the June 19, 1990 Comm1aaion minut.. of the ma.tar plan
approval (ordinances approved later) state that when the
applicant presented a new master plan to the Commission that
staff had never looked at and which showed no S.W. congress
Boulevard oonnection, Planning Department staff indicated that if
this road was not extended the right-of-way should be dedicated
for future road construction by the City if the need arose. The
proposed master plan doe. not reflect this either. In fact, the
current proposal shows 14 dwelling units and 23 parking spaces
within this right-of-way for the future road construction. This
leads to the argument that the 192 units previously approved
cannot be accommodated as townhouses within the acreage that was
previously designated for residential use, even with the very
small lot size proposed.
TO: Carrie Parker
-2-
October 13, 1995
Lastly, clarification is needed regarding staff's recommendation
for construction of turn lanes for this project. Based on the
attached Engineering Division Memorandum No. 95-379, received
after transmittal of the Planning and Zoning Department's staff
report, the following turn lanes are recommended:
1. Southbound left turn lane on Knuth Road into the
project;
2. Southbound left turn lane on Knuth Road at the
intersection of Knuth Road and Woolbright Road; and
3. Northbound right turn lane on Knuth Road into the
project.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff's recommendation remains unchanged,
subject to further conditioning any approval of the project with
construction of the above-listed turn lanes.
tjh
Attachments
xc: central file
A: TaraOMPM
,
t~
I ' . -' =-,~,',' ,; '#
... . ~i'" . :..;!.~ "(..
. . . .~~~
i ',':" ~\l~~
'l,~t' \ iU\~ii\\\\\,i\ ?,f,~\ I, .
\, 1 ~ ,,\\\\\\\~~tl'i \,\i~\
"\; '~"l ",,,,., Il"',
l.,IP 't\J'\\l"\\\~\ ,,\~\
i I' \ \\l'~l\~\\\l~\ "\hi '
\\'.'. .,J\'\.'l"~,', \'\l~
'.1.","'\. 1"
"'1,1' ,~\ "1 ' I'
I' U~.b\.~iUt. \""
I 1 \ \ tt '. .' r' · \
i \\ \. \,'lh" \" \ l~ 1 ili bhi I
I I \\\i i \' ~ \\\ \ 1\\ \\\\\\ \
\ \\' \ h \ \, \\\\\1 i
\ ~ \ \ \\ '\'1'1
.. " ' I' ,t ~~,\,
I 9 i" \ \l ""\1
i ~ ~ , \\ 1\ ,\
'3 f 0 \ \\ \ il
I I ~ ·
en I" lIlt 1
J ~ \ \l \ \ \ \ ,\ I '\ \ , \ \ ,
I II \\ i~q\ I .
I :-
J \';' , ,- ~"
II; .."" \"1
"~ \1 "~I
,i "'" 1 , J .,\, ,
\1\\\\\\\\\\\1\\ ' \\ \\ 1\
\'i~' I I
. , ,
, . I' I'
, ",. ., , .;; \
I"'. ~-"D ,\ \,~
un" ." , ,.. ,
~ ~~~: .. ., 1 \ H
..'
j \{~ \1
.1,1".\
t t I \
I
. , t
...-
~ "'1 __ _ .' .
.
.
.
:1
"
'I
.
.
..
.
..
.
oj
oj
..
..
i
..
..
.
.
.
.
.
...
.
.
,-
\\
:1
~.
-
..
.'
.-
o .
=,
'1
..
f
.
.
..
.
.
..
..
~
i
r'
;,
\..
,I
I 1,1
/.",.
. .
..
. .,,;J"
//
~.Y
?
DB'fBLOPMBft DSPAR~
SRGI"SRIRO .IVISIO. MBMORARDUM RO. 95-319
..
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning & Zoninq Director
M~am Hukill, P.B.
tIIWf-Englneer
September 29, 1'95
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
TARA OUS - DBCBI,sRA2'IOR LAJlB8
We have reviewed the Weisberg September 22 letter and find his
logic reasonable, particularly with regard to the southbound left
turn lane into Tara oaka from Knuth Road. A right turn
(northbound) lane into Tara Oat. from Knuth Road also is desirable.
Neither has much value until the -link- is constructed, but both
will be desirable at that time.
WVH:ck
..
C:T ARAOAXI.IJf
#I
'W'
..""
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-541
Agenda Memorandum for
October 2, 1995 City Commission Meeting
FROM:
Carrie Parker
City Manager .~J~
Tambri J. HeYd~~~
Planning and zoning Director
Michael E. Haag
Zoning and site Administrator
TO:
THRU:
DATB:
september 26, 1995
SUBJBCT: Tara Oaks PUD MPMD 95-007 (change in access,
recreation, unit type and use acreage)
NATURB OF REOUBST
Kilday and Associates, agent for pulte Home corporation, contract
purchaser of property owned by Bill Winchester is requesting to
modify the Tara Oaks PUD master plan. The 20.16 acre proj ect
previously planned for 192 multi-family apartment units, 20,000
square foot (650 seat) church and open space.area is zoned PUD and
located at the northeast corner of Woolbright Road and Knuth Road
extended (see Exhibit "A" - location map). The requested changes
are limited to the north 14.470 acres of the PUD and are as
follows: (see Bxhibit "B" - letter of request and proposed master
pl an) :
1. Omit the extension of S.W. Congress Boulevard to Knuth
Road.
2. Reduce the number of acce.s points into the project from
two (2) to one (1).
3. Increas. in the .ize of pod 1 (residential tract) by
incorporating, .6 acres resulting from the elimination of
S. W. Congresl Boulevard right-of-way. A new property
line which subdivides Pod 2 (open space) therefore
creating a project that consists of 5.69 acres for church
with open space and 14.7 acres townhouse project with
open space.
4. Change the type of units from 192 llult1-faa11v apal"".enta
to 23, two-storv build1ngs with a total of 1.a townhou..
units. .stablish the folloWing bu1lding and site
regulations for the townhouse units:
.
Building setbacks (indiVidual lots); front 10 feet,
rear 15 feet, 81de (end un1t) 3 feet, 8ide
(interior unit) 0 feet. Note minimum bU11ding
separation is 15 feet.
Pool setbacks; pools not allowed.
,.
Screen enclosure setbacks; shall comply with
bUilding s.tbacks.
Minimum living ar.. - 750 .qual"e f..t (propo..d
unit 81zes - 913 square teet, 1,079 square feet and
1,082 square feet)
BUilding height - Remains as originally approved
(30 feet, two stories)
Page 2
Agenda Memorandum for
October 2, 1995 City Commission Meeting
Tara Oaks PUD
MPMD 95-007
Lot area - 1,260 square feet (end unit) and 1,050
square feet (interior unit)
Perimeter setbacks: Increase the north setback from
20 feet to 40 feet. Please note the follOWing
setbacks l"emain as previously approved; 40 foot
front (west Knuth Road), 40 foot rear (east) and 20
foot side (south). Also note the perimeter
setbacks take precedence over building setbacks for
individual lots.
5. Change the type and location of private recreation
amenities from a clubhouse, pool, jogging trail, picnic
al-ea and fishing dock to pool, cabana (restrooms for
pool), sand volley ball court, jogging trail and gazebo
or garden amenity. The current and proposed location of
the recreation amenities are shown on Exhibit "C" and
Exhibit liB" L-espectively.
6. Establish a 25 foot wide landscape buffer along the north
property, 15 foot wide buffer along the east property
line and 10 foot wide buffer along the west (Knuth Road)
property line of the project. Pod 2 an open space and
detention area border the south property of .the
residential tract.
BACKGROUND
On June 21, 1988, the City Commission approved a master plan and
rezoning of the Tara Oaks PUD property from R1AAA (Single-family
residential) to PUD with a land use intensity (LUI) of 4.00 for 78
single-faaily, detached units.
On Deceaber 18, 1990, after review by the Department of Community
of Affairs (DCA) and with objections, the City Commission approved
ordinances for a land use element amendment that changed the land
use classification of the property from Low Density Residential to
Hedium Density Resident!al and rezoning of the property from PUD
(LUI:4) to PUD (LUI:5) with a maater plan for 192 multi-family
unit., private recreation aneS a 20,000 square foot church (see
Exhibit "c" - current master plan). The adopted comprehensive plan
amendment was transmitted to DCA on December 19, 1990, along with
responses to DCA's objections. In FebL"Uary 1991, the DCA issued a
notice of intent to find the comprehensive plan amendment in
compliance.
The 1990 application. were submitted under Palm Beach County's
current traffic performance standa~ds ordinance, however prior to
the effective date of the City's concurrency management ordinanc..
Therefore, concurrency certification for traffic and concurrency
.xemption for drainage and neighborhood parks were granted with the
1990 approva~..
On June 2, 1992, the City commi..1on approved a request to allow
construction of the south portion (adjacent to the church parcel)
of Knuth Road, prior to preliminary plat approval of the property.
The reason for submitting the request was to ensure the Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints' purchase of the church parcel
within the PUD, which took place on June 26, 1992.
On June 16, 1992, the City CommiSSion granted a one (1) year time
extension that extended the proj~ct's June 18, 1992 expiration date
to June 17, 1993. No application for extensions was made since the
June 1993 expiration, until a retroactive extension which was filed
.., ..",
Page 3
Agenda Memorandum for
October 2, 1995 City Commission Meeting
Tara oaks PUD
HPMD 95-007
in November 1994; a period of one year and five months.
On April 8, 1993, the City Commission approved a master plan
modification for the Tara Oaks PUD to amend the condition of
approval which required the construction of Knuth Road to be tied
entirely to the Tara Oaks PUD. The approval of the master plan
modification allowed the construction responsibility for Knuth Road
to be shared by the Knuth Road PCD.
On April 18, 1995 the City Commission approved the retroactive time
extension submitted November 1994. The approval granted nine
months to file a plat application. The approval was also
conditioned upon the applicant evaluating reducing density at time
of the applicant's next submittal (subject request).
Chapter 2.5, planned Unit Developments, of
development regulations states that changes
developments shall be processed as follows:
the City's land
in planned unit
Section 12. Changes in plans.
"Changes, in plans approved as a part of the zoning to PUD may
be permitted by the planning and Zoning Board upon application
filed by the developer or 'his successors in interest, prior to
the expiration of the PUD classification, but only [after] a
finding that any such change or changes are in accord with all
regulations in effect when the change or change. are requested
and the intent and purpose of the comprehensive plan in effect
at the ti.e of the proposed change. Substantial changes shall
be propo.ed. aa for a new application of PUD zoning. The
dete~1nation of what constitutes a substantial change shall
be within the 80le discretion of the City Commission. Non-
subatantial change. aa determined by the city Commission in
plana ahall not extend the expiration of the eighteen month
approval for the PUD classification.-
,
.
AHALYS:IS
staff has reviewed this reque.t for consistency with the PUD
development standards, and the intent and purpose of planned unit
developments as stated in the follOWing sections of Chapter 2.5 of
the City's land development regulations:
section 1. Intent and purpose.
"A Planned Unit Development Di.trict (PUD) is .stablished. It
is intended that this district be utilized to promote
efficient and economical l,nd use, improved amenities,
appropriate and harmonious variety in phY8ical development,
creative de.ign, improved living environment, orderly and
aconom1cal develop.ent 1n the city, and the protection of
adjacent and ex1stin9 and future CitV develop.ent. The
41atrict 1. au1table, for 4evelop.ent, redevelopment and
conservation of land, water and other resources of the City.
#" Regulations for Planned Un! t Developments are intended to
accomplish the purposes of zoning, subdivision regulations and
other applicable City regulations to the same degre. that they
are intended to control development on a lot-by-lot basis. In
view of the substantial public advantaga. of planned unit
development, it is the intent of pun regulations to promote
and encourage development in this form whare tract. .uitable
in size, location and character for the use. and structures
proposed are to be planned and developed as unified and
page 4
Agenda Memorandum for
october 2, 1995 city Commission Meeting
Tara oaks PUD
MPHD 95-007
coordinated units.
Section 9. Internal PUD standards.
B.
INTERNAL LOTS AND I'RONTAGB. within the boundaries of the
PUD, no minimum lot size or minimum yards shall be
required; prOVided, however, that PUD frontage on
dedicated publiC roads shall observe front yard
requirements in accordance with the zoning district the
PUD use most closely resembles and that peripheral yards
abutting other zoning districts shall be the same as
required in the abutting zone."
The following evaluates the significant issue relating to the
proposed changes:
1. omission of the S.W. congress Boulevard connection to Knuth
Road extended - This change will cause a redistribution of
traffic from the original approved road network. The police
Department Memorandum No. 0168 indicates that the response
time for emergency vehicles to the subject property as well as
the Clipper Cove and Lakes of Tara development would be
greatly increased if the road connection was constructed.
The Lake. of Tara HOlleowners Association has indicated that
they are not 1n favor of extend1ng S. W. congress Boulevard to
Knuth Road extended (see Ixhib1t "Dn - letter dated August 29,
1995 froll Lake. of Tara Homeowner. Association). The
association ha. al.o requested some minor improvements to this
area that are normally paid by an applicant as part of
abandonaent.
Fro. evaluat1ng the plan, it appears that the change in unit
type-froll apartments to townhouses and the desire to retain
the 192 un1t8 froll the approved master plan, as well as offer
a privatized comaunity, has driven the eliaination of the S.W.
Congres8 Boulevarq extension. The reason for this is that
because of stacking and clustering of units, apartments
(previou8 master plan) more efficiently use land; yielding a
higher number of units per acre. Unit types (such as
townhou.e.) that only clu.ter unit. and not stack, reqUire
more land area to yield the same amount of density, even when
both unit types are limited to two stor1es.
The argument often made of not wanting to extend an exi.tin;
road to a new project becau.e of traffic aneS cu.v1.1on of
re.idential tract. 1. not applicable to this p~o'ect .ince
even w1tb tbe previous ma.te~ plan the project'. re.idential
area was consolidated to one side (north) of S.W. congress
Boulevard. Furthermore, the only traffic that will use S.W.
congres8 Boulevard i8 the traffic generated by this project;
reason .being the exi.tence of Quail Rid;e to the we.t and
therefore, the lack of further extension of S. W. congress
Boulevard we.t of Knuth Road.
.. This is.ue of connectivity of road.. to the existing road
network has been rai.ed frequently over the past five years
due to increased popularity of privatized communities which
stem. from increa.ed crime or the perception of increased
crime. Rarely do applicant. and homeowner. under.tand that
with pr1vatization, quality of public .ervic.. (response to
fire, police, utility emergencies and evacuations) decreases,
not only to their development, but to surrounding existing and
future developments that benefit from the safety and
~ ...,
Page 5
Agenda Memorandum for
October 2, 1995 city Commission Meeting
Tara oaks PUD
HPHD 95-007
convenience of an improved, integrated road network within
their city or county.
In their memorandum the Police Department notes the benefit to
multiple communities when roads are extended. The pre-planned
extension of the existing dead-end of S.W. Congress Boulevard
was to provide quicker response by police units in the western
area of the city to the houses in the western areas of Lakes
of Tara which at this time only have access from Congress
Avenue. This gives the Police Department the option of
sending a police unit from the east or west, or both if
needed, to best handle an emergency in either the Lakes of
Tara or Tara Oaks developments.
2. Reduction of the number of acce.s point. into the project from
two (2) to one (1) - Implementing this change would result in
the need for emergency access point (s) . As indicated in
Police Department Memorandum No. 0168, they have prOVided
emergency access points along Knuth Road, however, the "Knox
Box" type of entry is not acceptable to the Police Department.
It should be noted that acce.s points restricted to emergency
vehicle." rather than providing a full access are less than
desirable and can reduce quality of emergency service too.
With the increased popularity of privatized communities the
fewer the access points, the lesser the cost to the developer
and homeowner. to secure their acce.. points with guardhouses,
or the le.. expen.ive method of automatic gate.. Both Police
and Fire have been accepting these alternative types of
acce.., prOVided the type of gate opening mechanism is agreed
upon, realizing that over time, the availability of these
emergency acce.. point. can be forgotten about and never used.
3.' Incr.... in the size of Pod 1 (residential tract) by
incoQK)rating the .6 acre. of the propo.ed elimination of S. w.
Congre.. Boulevard and the subdivision of Pod 2 - These
proposed change. are acceptable with the condition that the
subdivision of Po~2 does not decrea.e the total area of Pod
2 below the origilt'ally approved 3.5 acre. and that on the
master plan the acreage breakdown for each parcel/property be
delineated. A. was noted previously in issue 1 above, this
increase in Pod 1 size is driven by the omission of the road
extension and the desire to retain the full 192 units.
4. Change the' type of unit. fro. 192 multi-fa.ily apart..nts to
23, two-story ~uildings with a total of 11a townhouse units -
All ~uildinfJ and site regulation. are acceptable with the
exception of the location of the parking space. and the size
of the lots. The lots shall ~e extended to include no less
than two (2) parking spac.. on each lot. Find attached
Exhibit "B" - Townhou.e Chart, which i. a comparison of;
building, pool and screen enclosure setback., location of
park1n~,space., floor are. and lot are. of the site subject
reque.t and three other PUD townhou.e project. approved by the
City Commi.sion. The applicant i. propo.ing the minimum
number of parking spaces of two per unit, but does not include
.. them within the boundaries of the lot of the unit. The zoning
code reqUire. that "parking space. for all dwelling. shall be
located on the same lot as the dwelling to be serv.cl". NQ
other "true" townhouse project in the city, even in a PUD,
which generally allows flexibility with regard to building and
site regulations, in exchange. for greater open space, exists
without parking provided within the lot boundaries. The
bUi~ding Division has indicated that the city's security
ord~nance would not allow parking spaces to be numbered (in an
page 6
Agenda Memorandum for
October 2, 1995 city Commission Heeting
Tara Oaks PUD
HPHD 95-007
attempt to assign spaces to units). The reason for this is so
that it cannot be readily determined whether a homeowner is
home or not. There is much less of a chance of someone else
parking in "your" parking spaces if they are located
immediately next to your unit and on your property than if the
spaces where located on common areas.
5. Change the type and location of the recreation amenities from:
clubhouse, pool, jogging trail, picnic area and fishing dock
to pool, cabana (restrooms for pool), sand volley ball court,
jogging trail and gazebo or garden amenity - With respect to
the proposed changes in the location of the amenities, staff
is in agreement with the proposed locations. However as
indicated in the Recreation & Parks Memorandum No. 95-424, the
cabana is not acceptable as a recreation amenity that would
allow the applicant to receive one half credit towards
required recreation fees (one half credit applies to projects
that provide five (5) recreation amenities). Based on 192
dwelling units the full recreation impact fee associated with
the land value of 2.88 acres is required at the time of final
plat. The Recreation & Parks Department strongly recommends
that the applicant prOVide a clubhouse bUilding which would
allow the applicant to receive one half-credit for providing
five (5) recreation a.enitie.. Providing a clubhouse or
recreation building is consistent with the development of
other clu.ter housing projects in the City.
6. Bstablish a 25 foot wide landscape buffer along the north
property, 15 foot wide along the east property line and 10
foot wide along west (Knuth Road) property line of the project
- Tha propo.ed landscape buffer areas are acceptable to staff
with- the condition that the buffer area along the east and
we.t property lines be enhanced to include groupings of trees
(4 to 6 tree.) with a spacing between groupings not to exceed
thirty (30) feet rather than one tree every thirty feet. The
spacing and size of the shrub material identified is
acceptable. .
,
RECOMMENDATION
On TueSday, September 12, 1995, the Technical Review Committee
(TRC) met to review the master plan modification request. The
Board recommends that the City Commission make a finding of no
substantial Change for the proposed modification, and that the
Planning and Develop.ent Board approve the request, subject to the
staff exception. listed above and the attached staff comments
Exhibit "F" - Police Depart.ent Me.orandum No. 0168 and 0174,
Recreation & Parks Depart.ent Me.orandu. No. 95-424, Public Works
Memorandum No. 95-165, Engineering Division Me.orandu. Nos. 95-371,
95-349 and 95-304, BUilding division Memorandum No. 95-348 anel 95-
299, Fire Prevention Memorandum No. 95-346 WOC and planning anel
Zoning Depart.ent Memorandum No. 95-555. It shoulel be noted
however that' if the Com.ission concurs with staff regareling the
issues of the exten.ion 01 .-. W. Gon9Z'e.. .ouleval'd and conta1n1ftl
parking wi ~hln the lot boundaries ,the .a.ter plan would have to be
rev1sed. These revisions most likely will si;nificantly alter the
master plan. -
HEH:dim
xc: Central File
..CCA..n....'I'.r.
...",
..."
E 1t U 1. 13 1. '1'.
.
,
" p,.. "
..
LOCATION MAP
TARA OAKS
~ I U 11f==:;~'_A--'J:U=j*B '
t j . \'.J ll~~u'~, L -2;., '- tais:15:i [
J.~':=:. 3~ .. ,ufa_1T-, ~ ~r 'r:,c:rj~.'~1
!I' ',.'J r, ~ . I I ~ ..L'.ww"": : ~..
..... . -.... J r ~..;.,"T..,. .
C .1.... Ul u: -c:~ '=I. ""'.. ...........:
~' ~ . '-
. . 'I In rrt!: ...~ '-, b R3
pee F", 3"E : ,-. h >- f-i .. c:;..~:fotI1
1\ I ""7 .' - · NIC ',. i- 'I ~" < . :.. I r. p
\lJ '!-~ ,"'"- _.~..
IJ' II
I ~
'~ ~ ~1~"'- ~ J;J 01: I .. /1 .II:; _ ; I
.. \~\ ~: - I "~i..jQ I~)I R (lRm:'c>:1.- ~ j)
.. ~ \ 5~pl\l., ': n I, ~ 3 'i F /(, ie' ~ l... ~flrt.-
:, -. ',n '~.r:lt: II rs r./. ~,. \..- f,
~ 0 I J'jI .,~t~ ~ i. - J~~".,..... B:~~';"~
~~:..: ;;;; .. .-::1 ' . r' '.., /::,J r r ~ _ I- F' g~
"~ .:.:.:.:.:~.::: ~:'--l- t' : i " ~~jJj II- l ~ ~
· ....w.. . . ,', L ~ '-'" '\.
. ::::::~:::::::: .. , :. . "'-"' -'. . , .
. :.:.:.:<.:.........- . II. - I ,.' , , ",'
/i~ l L Ii 7 (~.:.jl i"";/i' \ N .... ';:['I~!< ..<,.::/. ..:.:.:>~~.>;~
/.~~ ~:~iiti:i~ .'/ or! II' i · 1. ,I,) f- ~;;>~> ..'. ~~.~ ....,
~ ,:t'tf, .' c,:;I'J " i= ',";; r. ;;'. ,,/ ,... i"'\, '.\ \,
-- :.:.::::::.:.:.: /.:./ - -'\l ~~. ) l/,' l!'y' .... .;
. ........ .... ~ . , . '. '" . . .
.:.:.:.:.::::.:. .. - ". ". . . .' / .... :: .
:.:.::::::.:.:.: -- '.. ---- · - .. . f " · 1, . . ",I t!1ti
~.' 1\ :l'i/flt.r~' .gi':~:<;.. ~ ~'J.. "," '-::.') ~l~ rr ~: I ~.'~fi- r~r
~ . _.... ,11 _ '""-~ ... '" p_ , I~,
: ~: :;:;;;;:::::;::: I~~' { 'u~...n.-R r""lo.- J~_ l- 'C"1-.. : ,,--. .
/ ' .~:;:;;:;:;:;:;:~ ;' '. I.:'f'~~J' ~ ~ . 1'...:... .;- _ _. ,
: .::~m,,: ,....., - . . -'1;: ,. j, .r.
- ~ Ii':,:........... , [; ~'\ ~ v. ~.
' . .. .,;....... ''?lrll m VI ; I __'_
. . ------ :::"'.':':':' , , . .
. . - '::::::i8i~:, .--..- ' , I I""! 1 r r , I R 3
..--..._.--~;; .,. - . . ...,
.. , ,--. , - .", .'Hv, W~""'"h
~ ~- ~~ ',\\) \ ~J h; CI:~_ '- : ,". -n ~ f
, . ~1.-4 ~"U)}':~ . : .. "'''JT,_~~~
i r- - ~; L, ~iI' ....: r . ~~II/I c~ ";;~~v..<i:5~
. I \11~ .1l1~~;; ~; ... <L ','1 ~. ~ Illt\ S; ~
)', ! ))~" =I'I~.F y =~ ~~ ...()
! \ II 1.tyr-... _ .. .",. . . 'A.I
.....:-=--=--===-~, :'I';'~'l"'f~ m C'l - I~~ _ H-
\iifl\l"':" ....' J IJ
=------ ....;:,.. --, ~ R3 ,I . , .
I]:r "':'fu:..TJ:L.o 'Tr~ II " '" "'II '~B .. ~...~:-.rmlcllm~
\r-' - ... 71' tiJ1 - ~i~
~. "t1 ~, ~1ii~~,,~;b~n,~ ? [~:Jl'o 4008g?,,~~,~T r~g" .
....
'-'
~
E X H I BIT "B"
.
.
.
"T .:P'l-' ,
. i I
/". I '
~ '...
"
Kilday It A..o....
unclecafM Archltecl8' Plan".,.
1511 Forum Piece
Sui.. 100A
We.t Palm BNch, FloricM 33401
1407. 689-6622 · Fa.: 14071 eee-2!8Z
August 31, 1995
Ms. Tambri Heyden. Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach Planning & Zoning Department
100 east Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: Tara Oaks PUD
Minor Mast... Plan Modiflcatlon
Our File No. 738.2
Dear Ms. Heyden.
Please accept and proc... the attached revlMd Information for. Minor M.". Plan Modification
to the prevtou8ly approved Tara Ow PUD, located north of Woolbright Road and east of the
future Knuth Road. We are submitting thia r.viaed Minor Mast.r Plan Modification application
on behalf of Pult. Homes Corporation South Florida Division contract purchasers of the property
and Bill Winchester, own.r of the prpperty, and incorporating comment. received at the August
15, 1995 TRC Meeting.
. ,
Th. lat..t Master Plan approved on June 8, 1990 r.nected a total of 192 multl.family units on the
northern portion of the site, an open space/preservation area centrally located, and a church
parcel on the southern portion of this site. The proposed Master Plan retains the 192 previously
approved units which will now be developed as fee simDle townhomes. The open
space/pre.ervatlon tract remains centrally located, and the church parcel remains unchanged on
the southern portion of the site. Attached with this application I. a revised Master Site Plan for
the project reflecting proposed building locations and oorr.spondlng lot line., acces. points, the
recr..tlon ar.a and parking configurations. The Conceptual Landscape Plan specifies proposed
landscape buffers and plant material requirements. A previously approved cross section is also
Included with the submittal set. this cross section has been r.vlsed to reflect an agr.em.nt
mad. betw.en. the Ston.haven Home Own.... Alsoctatlon and the property own.r The
conceptualenglneertng plans, as w.1I as a boundary and tr.. survey, are also attached.
The perlmet.r landscape buffer and the building setback. proposed .... consistent with those
previously approved. Minor adjustments have been mad. to the main access for the PUD. The
church parcel, which Is under separate ownership, will retain the two previously approved ~ccess
points. The previously approved plan reflected two main access points to the re.ldentlal ~Ircel.
This has been reduced to on. main acce.s point which will b. controlled with . ..curtty late.
Thr.e emergency acce.. location. ar. propo.ed el..wh.r. along Knuth Road. These access
~
..."
Ms. Tambri Heyden
August 31, 1995
Page 2
points will be stabilized to support the weight of emergency vehicle.. They also will be gated
and locked pursuant to the City of Boynton Beach Fire Rescue requirements. The developer of
Tara Oaks wilt be constructing Knuth Road from just north of the L-25 Canal south to Woolbright
Road Including the required crossings over both the L-25 and L-26 Canals. Concurrent with this
roadway construction, an eight foot wide bike path will also be constructed on the east side ot
Knuth Road adjacent to Tara Oak. PUD.
A private recreation slte.of 1.75 acre. is provided for Tara Oak. PUD. The active portion of the
recreation area is provided adjacent to the main entry. This recreation area has been relocated
from the site shown on the prevlou.1y approved Master Plan to addre.. conditions Imposed on
the original approval. A paulve recreation component consistent with that previously approved
is shown in the open space tract and will consist of a logging trail through the
preservation/relocation area and a gazebo or garden amenity at It. terminus. A total of five (5)
recreational amenities are proposed to receive one half credit for the public recreation land
dedication. Consistent with the past approval and the comments again included in Parks and
Recreation Memorandum '90-229, the developer will pay a tee In lieu of land dedication tor the
public park commitment.
The attached pMM have been revt.ed addre..ing tho.. I.sue. raised at the TRC me.ting of
August 15, 19H. and subsequent Items Inciuded In the TRC comment memorandums Issued by
each revtewlng department. The following I. a recap of the comments Included In the
memorandums and subsequ.nt r.,pon.e. by the project team.
,
pouce DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 0158
1. The final approved Master Plan depicted Southwest Congress Boulevard to be terminated
into a cul-de-sac p.r the request of adjacent r.sidents. The proposed plan shows the
western right-of-way stub of Southwest Congress Boulevard to be removed.
2. The developer i. investigating the feasibility of providing 24 hour acces. through the
automatic gate entrance system. A telephone access system or a similar feature will be
provided.
RECREATION AND PARK MEMORANDUM NO. 95-371
1. Attached i. a .tatement from our environmental coneultant .tating that the permit from the
Florida Gam. and flresh Water FI.h Comml..ion will not ohange the Ma.ter Plan aa
shown In order to comply with the requirement. of the permit.
2. A Tree Manag.ment Plan and an Environmental A.....ment are forthoomlng. In the
attached statement trom the environmental consultant,' there I. reterenc. to the Tree
Management Plan and the Flora and Fauna Survey.
UTIUTJES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-255
1. The revised Conceptual Engineering Plan shows water and sanitary sewer being provided
to Pod 3.
Ms. Tambri Heyden
August 31, 1995
. Page 3
2. The project .nglne.r Is aw.... of the comments and will Incorporat. them In their final
plans.
3. The revised Conceptual Engineering Plan showing a connection to the existing 10. water
main on Southwest Congress Boulevard.
BUILDING DIV1SION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-299
1. It Is the Intent of the developer to plat this project.
2. There Is an adequate number of parking spaces for each town house. These parking
tracts will be dedicated u either easements or common parking and access tracts.
3. Th. reer_tlon building wll be con8tructed along with the con8tNctIon of the first town
house building.
4. The fIrW SI. Plan will comply with parking signs and handicap cod.. A complete Site
Plan application will be proce..ed following Minor Mast.r Plan approval.
5. The fInIII Sit. Plan wlH .how the ..tabll.hed ....ment. and ..tback. .. they relate to the
town hou.... A complete Sit. Plan application will be processed following Minor Master
Plan approval. .
.
FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-325
1. The .pproved Muter Plan d.plct. 80uthw.8t Congr... Boulevard t.rmlnatlns Into a cui.
d....e p.r the requ.8t of the adJac.nt r.sld.nt.. It Is the Int.nt of the developer to have
the western right-of-way stub removed.
2. The attached Muter Site Plan h.. been revised to allow for tum-around area. with a
radius large enough to AQoomodate a fir. truck.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-304
A. The U. S. Postal .ervlce will be contacted to v.rify which road. win require naming, the..
name. will be Incorporated into the Site Plan application following approval of the Minor
M..ter PI&r1 application.
B. Th. traffla Impact .tat.ment wiD be revlHd to reflect the redletributlon ot traffic pursuant
to the removal ot the Southwest Congress Boulevard connection to Knuth Road.
C. The Master Site Plan has been revised to show sidewalks on both sides of the Internal
roadways. The sidewalks will b. in compllanc. with Chapt.r VI, Artlcl. III, Section 11 A.
Page 3 through 6 of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinance..
D. Deed restrictions will be established to provide for a property owners association to pay
for the operation of a street light system within the development at the time of plat
approval.
...,
.,
Ms. Tambri Heyden
August 31, 1995
- Page 4
E. The engineer for this project has certified that the drainage plan will comply with all City
code, and ,tandard. and. copy of thl, letter haa been att.ched for your review.
F - H. The engineer Is aware of the comments and will Incorporate them Into the final
engineering plan..
I. The eastem 25' of the 80' right-of-way has been dedicated. This dedication has been
recorded In O.A.B. 7324, Page 1162.
J. Acceptance from South Florida Water Management District and Lake Worth Drainage
District will be required prior to final engineering approval.
K. A permit will be obtained prior to working within the right-of-way per Chapter 22. Article
2. Section 7 (A). Page 22-3.
L In lieu of providing aldewalka on both sid.. of Knuth Aoad. the d.veloper has agreed to
instal .... If wide bicycle I pedestrian path along the .ast elde of the road.
PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-145
1. Th. sne Plan hu been revlHd to accomodate sanitation v.hlc.... As per our me.tlng
with Mr. Robert EIchorst. the garbage collection are.. will be located at the time of final
site plan approval · .
RECREATION AND PARKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-379
1. Th. recreation dedication requirement calculation hu been .hown on the Master Plan
(page 10f 4).
2. Th. five rec....tlon.. element. con.latlne of a Iwlmmlng pool. a land volleyball coul1,
logging traU, gazebo I garden amenity, and cabana have bean ahown on the M.,ter Site
Plan and Master Plan. The appropriate parking epace. have allO been lhown along with
the required handicap space.. It II the Int.nt of the dev.loper to utilize the cabana .s
on. of the five amenlti.., but no meeting area Is propoeed. An alternative amenity will
be provided if thl. Is not acceptable.
3. It Is the Intent of the dev.loper to provide a cabana .. one of the five amennle., but no
meeting areala propoHd. If. this is not acceptable an alternative will be provided.
4. The d.veloper agr... to con.tNet the Jogging trait with uphatt or another p.rmanent
surface to minimize maintenance. Th. r.vlled Maater -Site Ptan ,how. the Jogging trail
(1320 linear feet (1/4 mile) In length).
5. Details for private recreation equipment will be provided during the Site Plan Aevlew
Process.
6. Parking spaces will be provided for the two recreational elements In the southern portion
of the P,U,D. These spaces will be noted on the final site plan.
Ms. Tarnbrt Heyden
August 31, 1995
. Page 5
7. It Is the Intent of the developer to constNct a detention area leaving the rest of the open
space pod In Ita natural atate thus maintaining Ita natural characterlatlca. If a lake wa.
constructed In the open space area, the number of pre.erved tree. would decrease.
8. The preservation area will remain in the southern portion of the property.
If you have any questions or concerns In regard to this application, or If you need any additional
information, plea.. do {lOt he.ltat. to contact either Marcie TInsley In thl. office or myself. Thank
you in advance for your past time and future consideration for this project.
Sincerely,
c~~~
Kilday & A.aoclat... lno.
Encloau....
co: SUNIl PrIIInw1. Pult. Home Corporation South Florida Division
Yvome %lei. TraffIo Conaultant
Jim Drotoa, Shaw. Orotos
.1".d.eft,..--.-.J · · ~~~
Reoelved : Oat.
CWllblheyden.831
,.,.
...,
rill ,.& SHAH
~ - -.-
t..:lI...t1 DROTOS
EngIneerIng
SurveyIng
PlannIng
tkASSOCIATES
.90' N.W. ""Way
Sui'. .0.
Ft. LaucleldClle. Fl3330.
PH: 1954) 776.760.
FAX: 195.,776.7601
August 30, 1995
City of Boynton BeaCh
Engineering Department
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
AUn: Mr. William Hukill, P. E.
City Engineer
Re: Tar.Oaks.
SDA Project No. 95-0261
Dear Mr. Hukill:
The master plan i. in compllanc' with all City code. and .landard., Cn.pter 6, Article IV.
Section eA, pg. 8-7 .nd Ch.pter 23, Article IIF, pg. 23-8 of the Boynton Beach Code of
Ordinances for the master plan requirements.
If you have any questions or concerns, please do not heslstate to contact me.
Yours truly,
SHAH, DROTOS & ASSOCIATES
d" ~ uh
mes F. Orotos, P.E.
Florida Registration No. 35505
JFD:laf
L015.004
.
...."
Environmental Consultants, Inc.
222 S. U.S. Highway One' Suite 201 · Tequest3. Fl 3j469 · (407) 744.7420. Fax (407) 7'H-28S-
August 2 I. 1995
City of Boynton Beach
PO Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0130
Aun: Mike Haag
'WD' m @ ~ 0 \,.;7 r2 r.--, 1
II ~______,.~<_1:[' .';\1\
. ... I.
il,\ ~ 2 31995
lii".~
I' ,
I J ---...,
------.-
Re: Tara Oaks Gopher Tortoise Relocation
Dear Mr. Haag:
, Approximately 55-60 lopher tortoises (GoplJ,rlls polyph,mus) are predicted to occur
on the Tara 0aIII parcel. This estimated figure was determined usina the burrow survey dala
and data rcsuldnl from burrow hwestillation with an infrared video camera. The sile has
been significandy impacted by prior land usage and clearing activities. These activilies ha\'e
significantly degraded the available gopher lonoise habitat on the parcel.
,
The Tara Oaks parcel comprises +24 acres. Florida Game and Fresh Water fish
Commission (FGFWFC) studies indicate Ihal "ll~ ~\lllh..:r 'Orlois~ n:cluir":ll lln..:.hlllf cO,51 a__r~'
of suitable habitat for long teran survival. .\pprllx IIIHllely 30 acres of '-lpllmai hahiuH \\ \..'lllld
be required to support the predicted Tara Oak'i gopher tortoise population. Currently. th..:
parcel supports a population density in exccss of th is recommended densit)' and. as such.
on-site preservation is not a viable option duc: to the: presence of insufficient. low quality
habitat on the Tara Oaks parcel.
C&N recommends off-site relocation of die entire population to a large. regional
gopher tortoise re-stocking area. Mr. Tom Stice (FGFWFC) concurs with the survey
findings and the need to accommodate the lortoises Ihrough off.site relocation (telephone
conversation Augu,s~ 21. 1995).
An off.aice relocation plan i. bei", prepared for lubmlnal co thl FOFWFC. Upon
authorization of the off.site relocation permit. the lortoises will be' captured and relocated 10
the designated recipient site.
The listed flora and fauna survey also identified three scrub mint (Conradina
gralldiflora) plants which are slated to be relocated to the proposed on-site preservation area.
No other state or federally listed floral or faunal species were observed on Ihe Tara Oaks
parcel.
'W'
.",.,
.-=- 3
.....
The off-site gopher tortoise relocation permit issued by FGFWFC will not alter lhe
, Tara Oaks Master Plan or Site Plan as shown in order to comply with the permit
requirements. nor will the proposed tree relocation plan.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely.
C&N ENVIRONMENTAL CONS LTANTS. INC,
c~~Gax
President/Senior Biologist
CMC/aj
cc: Kevin J. Hallahan. City of Boynton Be.aeh
Willia.. V. Hukill. P.E., City of 80)'mol1 Beach
. Susan Prillaman, Pulte Home Corp.
Marcie Tinsley. Kilday & Associates
95-041
,
,
" \\ "
\ '.,
\ ,:;.
..'~ -4
. ~:. 1\ ; ~ >l ,.., '\ t"" . -.; t ~ H ~ ~
:. ~ -: ~ ~ \ \~.\ ~ " ~; . ; ~ r i i . \ \1 \~ \ \l' \ \\ f1' ~
:,~~:\?'-:'~l~\l';\l.\,o .~ ~~. 0
(>~ W \1 \1~\ \\\ W\ \\\~\ '\\ ~~. ~
I , I' 'Ul .. \' ,l\ \\l\ \ it c \\1 "0
. . \"'" '.', f \ 1\ \ \ · ~\l ~
.. ,,, ~ ;i\ I ~ ,\~. ~~l Jt I .
. ..' 4 9~ ~~ \ ~ \ ,- \- \ \ \ \ \ \ i
~U\~\\\\~\~. \\, \\ \\i. ~
\'\ \~,\\l~ l"" h,\ \ 1 \ I ,g
IJ"~~\l'!\ ,li . '~\ ;
~~\.\!\\t71. \\ \,. \
.!&\ \ t';'-:'- ~ '\
r,o \ n 'I 'i. \ \
\:1 ~~ ~ -
: 1~a · \' ' '
I A!. 1 ..
I! \.',. \ .t.
---~ - : -..-: -
. ; . .. ., ,no;', .,'
t . . .. i~" & 1 \\ ~ '. \ \ · t S . \-\
~\ \i' \~~ ,~~a \\ t,\~ ,\~ \ .'.\, \\
. \i \1.. \ \;\ \'.\ ' '\h
. \ ,\,' \' l' . It \ \,' '\
~\l ~~~~ 1\ \\\,~\\ \ \~\ "
1.. 111 _ _ \, \~\~ "
" ....... \.., ~\
, )l \ \.;. 1 J, ·
. 1'...t \{. \\\' \ r\
~~~,& \ \~\o \\\\ ,\ ,\\
l't- \ \1' \\1. 5"
~ \.~ \\
- ,._"., i,
. .
\
,
i
'2..
:- \ II
~-::: :-~
.' ~ P'":::a
;. ~ toor:a
~:- .......~ ~
- ~
or. ."
~.- P
- -
. .
~
-: :. .......
~ ~ ....,
::! ~
-:~
;: ~
~ (I)
~
d
d
\\ ~
,
.
,
\~~\\
\ ,\,\ "
~\ ti'
:,... .; is
~i l'
ot:2 -I
~ :2 ·
__""!, CP
",""" Q
~a
I-
N
oJ'
~
...
..,
...,
E X H I BIT "c"
,
,
Y, ,'It ,."
-,:, ;: , ...1. n-'" \"J .,. ~'
.\ \\\\~.l. ""., , ' '. .
,m,tt _'" ~~ \ . \ . ~ .' ' ...
~l1- .. ~ " : at" ·
. ..11 . \
~g a~. ",;.j' '
~ . "['. ,
t% " 't ""'i J
~ \ \\'l\'i\\\\~,\ ",\~. r.
J"i"\l,h\\\' ':\i" \
.;: I '\\~\i\l;I~'.\ tl~'
· 'fA , MII'\:I'\\l'\'~'\
~ \ Ili\~i\\\\l~ ~\,
\')\"l,\~\II' \,\\'
~ \i\\\~\\\I,I\'l \\\\~
% "Ulh'., II.
"111' ·
" · \' \ \\\ t ,II \
. · \\':, ~\, \' I.
.'1 ,l\ __ I ,I \u ~
':'" · \ . \'
.~ lo , , \\ ", ,
,\ \l \ ~\\
'II Itl\' I
\ \ , \\ \ \ '\\ , ~ \ , \, ,
II \ \ \' \ '
, .
,\,,' \\ h \.\t: .\" \ '
J \ I \ .,'..', :'. ~\. 1
~ i ,\t' ,., "., .'*. . ....
Ii ....', ;n~
'\\\\\\~\~" .\~r\ \\\
, "",
· · "~ t r ~ \
"". .., , ", ~
'Jll:... · J!) ~
Ii '~r. i. " . i ,\
,'"in- . _ " ~\" :
, ",'
....
~
---
I'
i,
\~
:lii ~
~ ...~
i1\.. I :
. 1; r .
t\.., .
. \..
3!.l \
...,t ,
w'
....
="
'1
\\
,"~I l \
\I\i \ \
0#\ ;
" . j\ :
3.' \
wi..
.....,
3.,
!:.
......
: ,
,'i\ 1
'f ,\,
. t. I
3'i;
~
..
~
\'.~
\'\
~,
,
..- '
--
--
'WI
~
E X H I BIT nOn
~'~:-
.
.
Tora laku Homeowners Assoclotlon
43 TQIQ lake. Drive East
Boynton Beach, Fl 33436
Telephone (407) 732-54 7S
ill
August 29, 1995
Ms. Tambrt J. Heyden
City of Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach. FL 33425-0310
PLANNING All
lONiNG :J~Pl
Dear Ms. Heyden:
In following the newspaper articles in regardI to the Tara Oaks project and furthermore to a
telephone conversation that you and I have had in April on the subieCt. we the residents of T afa
Lakes are pleased that the -City of BoynlDn Beach- haa -approved- the extension of Knuth Road
through to Woolbright Rd.
In addition, we are pIeaIed to learn that ..,. ant no longer plana to 8CC8II the new community
trom Southwest Congress Blvd. With thiI in mind, the community of Tara Lakes wishes to ask
that,the City of Boynton Beach ~ annex the small extension ot road that goes beyond
Tara LakM Drive W.. to the Tara l.ak8I HOA. In addition, a dead end barricade and caution
sign would nMd to be pIKed In that position where the road pruently ends by the City of
. Boynton e.ctI to prohibit illegal v.hicle 1I'afflc and dumping if thll annex II allowed.
-
In regardI to thle matter, Tara Lakee HOA would like to ptace a buketbaII hoop in the .pro-
po"" .,.. for the rukientI of our community to .njoy. Aa the paved extenIion of road .xists,
there would be minimum COlt to both Twa Lakee and City of Boynton Beach to allow tor such
stNctur.. In addition, the '"t.~rary" Mno could be r.moved at a lat.r date if the decision
was made to connect Southwest Congress to Knuth Rd or oth.r extension.
AI the lurfaclng Ie already prepared It WDUId be a theme to ... thll property tom up when It
could be uHd tor re.. community actlvtty. Our plan would make the extensJon a small park.
Possibly a small ficus hedge wouJd be addld to give the area some needed aesthetic look also.
Plea.. conaldar our ,.queat and advtle . you think thle II pollibte. I can be con1aCt.d .t my
offlc. at (407) 997-22;8 during normat ...."... houlS or at my home In the ev.nlng at (407)
737-9173. We are prepared to contact the .Clty Commi..ion- or other offloJaJ if neo....ry.
In conclualon, thank you in advance for your conaiperatton.
Sincerely,
(1' . "I
i~A~ \\0 .l.(!
Robert J. lal...
Pre.ident
Tara Lake. HOA
Bob Lelssl.
Pr.Sld."r
81\1e. Orns
Treosur.
Arl..n Cogon;
Secretc/v
rim,
c:
1..0 I".;:ls..::.:a=III
Emil Moseorrello
Ard'lIt1..ftl1
relT\l l.. Golembl.wski
Im9QtlCIl
Alon landers
~
. .
...,
E X H I BIT "E"
,
.
"
'X
t'1
';I:
..
P.
I-'"
~
'Z~';I:t1\tPt4
0010.001
. ';< ~ ';< -< ';<
<0 t'O. ::s <0
U'tntnQlrot<
. 0 I-'"
",OS ::s<O
.....00' ~
Ol-<<otP
(1'::SUl<oOl
(1'(1'oa('1'
o 0
::s ';f'
..
..
\}
.
"
"
.
..
.
...
Ult:PUlCfl~ 1"S1
t'O C 1-" 1-" t'O t"\
"d 1-" P. P. oa 0
oa ..... (\) (\) 1'1 ::s
t"\ p. . . ('1'
oa t"--
('1'::st'\H "
1--" 10 ::s ~
o p.("'\' G"1=
::s t'O 0010
., ..... 1"'\ 1'1 C
01--" oatil
('1'0 IO(\)
_ 1'1 (\)..
.. ~ .-
'Z ....NN
_ 00000
'P ...--
t'1 ~T
cnt'1
.-!d
~~
t'\
to~
H
rod
c:::0
01:'1
~~l
~'P
~t'"
'P
Cfl~
ro'Z
c:::
d
Ult:PUlUl~ '"'1
t'OCl-"'l-"'t'O 1'1
"d 1--" 0. 0. t>> 0
1>>.....<0<01'1 ::s
1'1 0. ,. ("1'
0011-"'--
('1'::stltt-t "
1--" 10 ::s ::s
o p. (1' G"1 =
::s <0 001 0
.. ..... t1 1'1 C
01--'- I>>tn
("1'0 IO(\)
_ 1'1 <0'.
lJlt:PUltl1~ '"'1
(1) C 1-" l-'" t'O 1'1
"d 1--" 0. 0. I>> 0
Ol ..... <0 (\) 1'1 ::s
1'10. .. ("1'
I>> 1-"'--
("1'::stltt-t "
1--'- 10 ::s ::s G"1 ';I:
6 0. c;: l>> 0
., ..... 1'1 t1 C
01--'- OoIUl
("1'0 IOt'O
_ 1'1 <0'.
......." ..
.... ....N....
OOU'....U'
.. ...." ..
N
<::I
.....-..
N .... NNN
<::I OOOU'O
... .............
'Z
o
~
"d
t1
o
<
001
.....
Ul9m'"
(1)0011-"'<0
~('1'p.l>>
v 0(1)1'1
oa ::r ..
o 1ft
~~~.
I-"'l>>
..........
0.....
I-'"
::s
10
Uliltl)'"
(Ooal-"'(O
a,('1'0.0I
vO<ol1
l>> ::r ..
o U'
~t1 -
e.~
....1>>
0.....
1-"'....
::s
'"
tIl~m
t'O I--',::r
(1' ('1' Ol '
tt::r.....
l>> ....
ot1
~CO
V\ I-'" 0
....~
0.....
~-<
'"
....N
0'"
::s -
QS
....
~
~
Q\
o
.....N
O,p
::s -
"'~
I-'"
0.
(1)
~
_ U'
_ 0
....t-t
o'='
('1'rot
., (1)
1'1
I-'"
o
t1
tit
::s
0.
....
o
("1'
~~
('1'rt
., <0
t1
I-'"
l>>
.....
~
Po
....
o
(1'
..
N
,p
..
N
,p
.
N
.,.
..
U)
,p
-
\J'
~
\D
U'
~
\D
\J'
~
,I)
o
~
\0
o
Nt.)
Q\
ltI
(1't1\
0<0
t1(U
...:('1'
t..) ~
\J"
ltI
('1'rft
o (0
t1 (1)
~("'\'
-
-
.... I--'- t'O ..... 'd "
O;Ss>>Ol>>~
r4'Q.nnt1.....
. l-",:r t>> -r. C
< ("'\' 1--" l-'"
1-" ('\1:1 1""\
P. ...1...u (tl
~~ n.
~\ i ,.'
~-' ,-'
..... r" ,1) ..... 'd "
O::SI>>Ol>>t'O
rT p. ("\ n t1 .0
. r',:r t'J ;'t ~~
< r4' ro' ro'
\'. 1t.::S t"\
fl.. 0..U (ll
'.: 0.
" .....
~
'P
';n
'P
o
'P
~
to
ro
c:::
o
(J')t:PtI1Ul';n n1
(\)Ct-"r'"(\) 1"'\
'd 1--" P. P. I>> 0
1>>....(\)t'Ot1 ::s
t"\ p. .' ("'\'
oal--"--
('t::strSt-t "
I--'- 10 ::s ::s r. ~
o Po rot ..' ...
::s (\) 1>>0
.. ..... t1 t1 C
o 1--" I>> V\
("'\'0 IOt'O
_t1 (1)"
.. ...,.;I ..
....
\J'
....'Z....
~O\J'_O
........-'J:'-
001'"
....0
....0
0....
~tA
(0
p.::S
o
("1'
lA~Ul
(0 ....::r
rot a, l>>
tt.......
001 ....
0t1
;<CO
V\ ~i
'Paid
.... ....
::s~
'"
....~
00
::s -
1t:1..
I-'"
0.
(0
~
.....
o
-
~~
(1'(1'
.. (0
1'1
I-'"
o
t1
tfi
::s
0.
....
o
("1'
..
~
o
...
,.
<::I
..
~
~
....
o
o
.
....
o
o
-
- --
tAUl
S~
t1\Q
~.....
t'O
-
-
.... 1--" t'O .... 'd "
o ::s 01 0 l>> 11
M'Q.oot1-
. I--',:r I>> ;'t C
~ ("1' ro' ro'
t-" ro~1"'\
p. p..o ,t)
'..:. fh
~I ,~jl .,J.:
, .'
~
~
(..0
t:'1
~
,....0'
~;5
t:lb
~l""l
l""l':2:
t:l~
e
>Cfl
t"'~
1::'0'
a>
Ul~
_Ul
001'"
....0
....0
0....
l.tA
t'O
p.::S
o
('t
tA1.(I)
(1) l-'" ':t
("1'('tQl
o,::r....
l>> .....
00'
~co
fJl ro.o
'Pa~
1--'-....
~-<
,0
.........
0U'
::s -
\Q
..
I--'-
0.
(0
~
,p
U'
-
'O~
("\'(1'
.. (1)
t1
I-'"
o
t1
....
V'
..
(O'dQ),oO
l>>l>>n"1Q
lJ\1'10o""
(1);o;'t'Ocs
~ \," t..) ::s 0
t'O ~ l''l p.::S
::s dl
("1' \,)
.:
~'"
~~
~
Ul
l"'(.
c
c
III
~
Ul~
~
tlS~
~ri
Ul~
~
.
~
c
~
'2
';I
C
c
c
,
i
~
8~~
i%~~
~-,..
~
'S
0.
.....
o
(1'
..
~
8~
i~
~~
~
....
....
CP
..
~
~
.....
o
.....
o
N~
o
U\
('tt1\
0(1)
1""\(1)
...:r4'
,....
~~
H~
~~
...,
-
.... 'd "
otll'-
Ol"\~
O'~c.
("1' ro' to"
(\! t;i t1
0.\11 ,0
n,
~
~
<::
'2
...
.:j \.
~.., ~ t
~
..".,
E 1t a '! 13 '! '1' \IF"
.
,
..
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REF:
r~
BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT A~n~/J{~!J
Ii '/ '''l. fin
TRAFFIC UNIT ..,t. ~
I "
I v.9j"
T AMBRI HEYDEN. PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR ~ ~~ilr-- )
SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT ~~~tJ.~
II SEPTEMBER 95 ~
TARA OAKS 2nd SUBMITTAL MEMO #01 6K
. .yw...."".::::.t
I have reviewed the above plans and st~I~~mJ)fFmUf:S~cnt from earlier memorandum.
In addition. there are now proposeqJ~~~c:ftJ\ccc~~long the western propcny linc.
alonll Knuth Road. The PI~ Sox" type I~ I ilm'!'llliUl'C what this concept
rcfers to. but if it indicates tb ,~ of 'a key to each gate and IOC;.."t~.'" I would not recommend
this method of securing an ",: "access. These gates c....J'T~""'an imponant pan in
cvac~ation of l'C.4iidents ~~I en~~ for police critical inc'4en'\~teams. Locating keys for
speCific development>> tT....f.I./ t the City IS not a preferred trcnd.\~ n
I aiso maintain my previous position on S.W. Congress Blvd. The d~~~iopmcnt will only be
accessible Want ~UB1bia W. ~ B~~. or lE; bti&ht Road. Response tim~
for emel'lency yehlel . g~)t...11fpt'casc4 l~'l9tficer . ety be . omcs a concern. I realize
the objcetiOlllIiom eli ,eanC'fT~~lopm ,.,.. b~:) believe completion of
S. W. Congress Blyd w . . am. ' tDncUo thclr comi1iWlilie"s allo. A traffiC study was
supplied by Yvonne Ziel Consultants. Inc. regarding traffic flow and projected growth in this
area. The study refeR tQ.a.J;i atudy and allo rctlCCtl tho 1988 'PP~""^'\)>>f 77 "insle family
unitl for Tara Oaka. nt.r1tt. 'I not vallcl., lhi.. point. .. tho projc' ~an. can ror tripling the
number ofunit~ thereby' i tho nwnbcr of vehicle travel. Tar., ~ '.. now planning on 194
un~ts and I fcel the study ft'~""",_~o be. red~ne a~d funhcr considcr~~g~~f S. W. Congress Blvd
bemg complcted should be . ,ch.i~ In thiS prOJcct..,,~/:i" }y'
," , ' L/ I), ,,",'
""~ . } '.'. .x.. ~ ", '....,
...~:::. r~'-",,, Cl. "."."",~:;;.,<,>,,:.:';;./
! r---l \,^y,~ :,....,.:::>".'",.., '::,..i'
l.j l {-...) '" ! 1, ((, )::? '
~ ! )',}:: -I '" .'.........',.,<,..
~...., (~f t.t '.,......w..:..:oY
~);;tUk~
~arlon Harris
Pol ice Department
~
"""
I
i ~ i
t ~ ..
ill
" 'I
BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC UNIT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REF:
TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR
SGT. MARLON HARRIS. POLICE DEPARTMENT
28 SEPTEMBER 9S
TARAOAKS- REGARDING MEMO #0163 MEMO#0174
. -:-"""..................
This memo is reganilnl my earlier ~1~ I(llllit;,ftow survey. I have had
conversation with Ms. liel nprdin~)riitt ".".~u~~.;'~!li8 now clear and I have no '
problem with her traffie study ~ s~ still mamtairttpY posit~~. on all other points
regarding this plan. 1(.' ,/.>,"', > "".,
^ ':) " .,$........,.
..~. vr \
~" :. """...\
r::J' \~ \~
Res~I\;,
',,~
[B ~.[B 0 [P, In~.
Police Department
.:;>''':'1.;=>(
tM.....,.........:::l . ~ . . ':. ,
~,__.H. .,'~,~. l/ii ~11
l!h /::
~ "', :;..... ;;.
.:::.... .:::.:.............:-'
~^...- , '^'. ..""
.(~ />~.
~ ~ ,~ '.. ..:' ../" j' .',.)
.~ ..~~ ~'J l'~ .)!
::" !J . "',,:,\ '",......f
" ':,y'< ." . '. ";..<'
, lnu'~'~1J n ((::;;::~,.
, ~~. I '" '.,.,.....,.-:;..","
. U""-
FROM:
RECREATION" PARK MEMORANDUM #95-424
Tambri~~PlmDiDg~ZomngDiRdor OOL~' ~::6 m @
John Wtldncr, Parks supcnntenden=:L : PI..~NNING AND
'--" lONi,,111 DEPT.
Tara Oaks POO - 2nd Revicw (M Plan Modification)
TO:
RE:
DATE:
September 18, 1995
The Rc:crcation" Puk DepIItmaIt baa reviewed the masterplan modification (2nd review) for Tara
Oaks PUD. The following comments are submitted:
1. The deveIopei appears to have addressed all comments in Recreation" Park memorandwn
#9S-379 with the exception of #2 concerning the provision of a clubhouse/meeting room
wbicla ia still showa a a cabanL
2. A cabaaa is not considered a separate recreation amcaity but is considered a part of the
swimmina pool. This department fccls strongly that a recreation ccnter building
(ctubhouselmeeting room) illID essential part of thc complete private recreation package for
this type residential development.
. .
3.
RepresentativCl for the developer have indicated their witlinpe.. to provide a different Sth
private recreation element but not a recreation center/meeting room. We would wn
recommend this as an acceptable alternative.
4. At this time, the Recreation and Park D~artment cannot recnmmend one-half credit far
private recreation provided.
.
S. Baed on 192 D.V. X .01S0 acres. 2.88 ICrca recreation impaot fee. Since the developer
is not reco.k~~ fOr one-half credit, the tull 2.88 acres fcc is required at the time of final
plat.
JW:ad
xc: Charles C. Frederick. Director, Recreation & Park Department
File
~
."",'
l
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #95-165
TO:
Mike Haag, Zoning Site Administrator
FROM:
Robert Eichorst. Public Works Director
SUBJ:
Tara Oaks Master Plan Modification - 2nd Submittal
DATE:
September 12, 1995
The applicant at the above lite baa requested can pickup at these location for solid waste disposal
and recycling which could pouibly be accommodated, however the location and accessibility for
servicing mUla be shown at time of site plan submittal.
.~~~
II V ~~ Eichorst
Public Works Director
REIer
l~
DBVBLOPMBft DBPARTMBR.,
ZRaI"BRIRa DIVISIOR MBMORARDUM RO. 95-371
TO:
FROM:
Mike Haag
Zoning/Site Administrator
NJAA'~ Hukill, P.E.
(j(j!iifE;;g ineer
September 26, 1995
DATE:
RE:
TARA OUS - TRAFFIC SIGIIAL
As you know, Mr. Weisberg has informally reported that future
traffic at the intersection of Woolbright Road and Knuth Road is
not projected to warrant installation of a traffic signal at that
location. He suggests that it is possible for the City to require
the developer of Tara Oaks to escrow the cost of such a signal
( $35, 000%) to cover installation up to two years beyond development
substantial completion and subject to traffic counts at that time.
If the aignal i. not then warranted, the escrow payment would be
returned to the developer.
It is my opinion that '~raffic projections from Tara Oaks are so
light that the likelihood of a signal being required in the future
is minimal. If Knuth Road is constructed through to Boynton Beach
Boulevard, additional traffic would be generated at
WOOlbright/Knuth. That may be pretty much offset by the reduction
in traffic to/from Tara Oaks since residents and visitors will have
the option of going either north or south on Knuth Road.
If the Commis.ion wishes to make the escrow arrangement d.scribed
herein a condition of approval of Tara Oak., we have no objection.
.
WVH:ck
xc:
Carrie Parker, Citr Manager
Ken Harl, Engineer ng Aide
C:TARAO^KS,81O
....
....
DBVBLOPMBft DBPUnmWT
B.OI'-BRIBO DIVISIOB MBMORARDUM HO. 95-3t9
RE:
Mike Haag
Zoning/Site Administrator
~~~m Hukill, P.E.
{}tt~ngineer
Sept~mber 13, 1995
TARA OUS - TRU'PIC IMPAC'! UALYSIS
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
We have today first seen the September 12 traffic study for Tara
Oaks. The two significant requirements contained therein are a
right turn lane in at the project entrance and a southbound to
eastbound left turn lane at the Knuth Road/Woolbright Road
interse~lon.
Normally additional conditions would not be placed on an
application this late, but clearly it was the applicant's
delinquent submis.ion of the traffic study which made it impo.sible
to respond earlier.
.
.
WVH:ck
(':T AItAUAKS. TRP
DBVBLOPMBIIT DBPARTMBRT
BHGIHBBRIRG DBPAR~BHT MEMORANDUM HO. 95-304
FROM:
Mike Haag, Zoning/Site Administration
b6t~am Hukill, P.E., City Engineer
August 16, 1995
R n ~n 8 ~
\~ lI---'l I
, II., I I' '
TO:
DATE:
RE: TARA OUS - MASTBR PLAII RBVIB1f
We have reviewed subject development and have the following to
offer:
A. Verify whicb roads require naming (for mail delivery)
with u.s. Postal Service.
8. Provide Traffic Impact Statement. Chap.2, Sec.9C4h(5),
pq.2-85
C. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and
collector streets. Chap.6, Art.III, Sec. 11A, pg.6-3
D. If street lighting is provided, establish deed
restrictions providing for a property owners association
to pay for the operation of the system within the
development. 'Chap.6, Art.III, Sec.14, pg.6-4 and Chap.5,
Art.5, Sec.2A4, pg.5-9
E. Provide Certification by Developer'. Engineer that
drainage plan complies with all City codes and
standard.. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7 and Chap.23,
Art.IIF, pg.23-8
F. Minimum 1S. pipe must be used in storm sewer. Chap.6,
Art. IV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7
G. Inlets must be in grassy areas unless otherwise approved.
Chap.6, Art.IV, See.5B, pg.6-8 and Chap.23, Art.lIF,
pg.23-e
H. Locate all drainage easements. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.68,
pg.6-9
I. Knuth Road is a collector road by both PBC and FOOT
standards (see FS 334.03(4) and must be dedicated to City
of,Boynton Beach. Required dedication is 25'. Chap.6,
Art. IV, Sec. lOU, pg.6-15
J. Need SFWMD , LWDD acceptance prior to Engineering
approval. Chap.6, Art.VII, Sec.4B, pg.6-24
K. Permits must be obtained for work within R.O.W. Chap.22,
Art.II, Sec.7A, pg.22-3 .
L. In lieu of providing sidewalks on both side. of Knuth
Rd., install an eight foot concrete bicycle/pedestrian
path along east side of road.
WVH/ck
I. I \1<<'\0,\,,-.\ MI'II
~
...,
From:
~{O)rJC-~[;)
lQ]l . I!#~
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Direct,o~~- '[:i'~:r.. "AID ~.wt
-~ .... , 1..
........ ' !1';' "
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official -.
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-348
September 19, 1995
To:
Re:
TARA OAltS PUD
Northeast corner of Woolbright & Knuth Road extended
Building Division review of the response to our five comments in
Memorandum No. 95-299 (copy attached), is not acceptable unless
the plans show the correction. Our comments still stand, and it
should be noted that our code requires parking to be on-site with
the unit parking above the requirements allowed on common land.
AN:mh
~~~~
Al New ld
I
Attachment:
Copy of Memorandum No. 95-299
Plans
co: William V. Hukill, P.R., Department of Development Director
II
II
A'T...AO....T..
BUILDDIG DIVISIOR
MBlC)RAHDDM NO. 95-299
August 16, 1995
Prom:
Tambri Heyden" Planning 1& Zoning Director
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Tara 0akII POD
Northe..t corner of WOOlbright . I'Duth Road extended
To:
Re:
Since a description of the request is to madify the Master Plan
to change the type of units from apartments to townhouses, the
Building Division would like to make the following comments:
1. Site should be platted.
2. parking should be adequate for each townhouse on its
OVll premise.
3. Recreation bu~ldings should b. constructed.
.
4. Plans should be in compliance with parking signs and
handicap cod..
5. plans should show established easement. and setbacks as
it relates to townhouses.
.~
Al ..- -:: --- - -
AN:mh
Att. Plan.
cc: William V. Hukill, P.B., Department of' Development Director
",1''''''O''&I,\'IC:
~
~
'.
Fire Prevention Memorandum No. 95-346 WDe
TO: Planning Department
FROM: Fire Department
DATE: September 21, 1995
RE: MPMD 95-007
Tara Oaks
Knuth Road Extended
The attached are the standard requirements for security gates. These requirements should be
retlecl~d on the site plan.
cc: Chief Iordan
1<1>0 n Campbell
File
-
-
.' ,. j, 1 ~', i'j
" I l.
\
SECURITY GATES AND EMERGENCY ACCESS:
The Fire Department continue. to have the opinion that
security gat.. are detrimental to Fire and Rescue operations.
The minimum performance for security gate. is as follows:
1- Gate. shall be openable by telephone, with a call from
central Di.patch center.
2- when the gate i8 opened by the call from central
Di.pa~ch~ it .hall remain open until the emergency i. over;
at which time central Dispatch will ba told, by officer in
charge, to clo.e the qate.
3- In ca.. of a power failure the gate shall open
auto.atically.
4~ Appropriat. "Hold Harmle.." agree.ent re: damage to
gat.. equipm.nt, etc.
.
.
~
."""
PLANlIING .~ND zor-HHa DEPARTME~JT
/.IEHORANDUH I-I0. 9~-5~~
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
Pl. ~l1111.11g and Z"n1.119' Di~-fctor
C fJr"-;"-
M1chael E_ Haag ~. U
Zoning and Slt2 De ,- ent Adl1nnlstrator
DA.TE:
september 26, 199~
FRO;,: :
SUBJECT:
Tara OaKs (planued unit d~veloprnent) HPHD 95-(
(elinunatl.on ot the extension vf S. ~J. Congr-ess Bvul~var
alteration of the location and type of recreation, a ~hallge
unit type. f1:om apal.tments to tOHl1house:s, establ1shme:nt
pel-lmetel- buffer e:aseu.ents and dwel.lu'lg lUllt st:tbacl.s a
establish a par~el line between the new townh0use PlQJ8~t d
tta church prop~~tYI
Please be advised of the following comments l-elatlve to the seco
reV1ew of th~ modif1ed master plan tor the above-referenced project:
1. ~lith a distingUishable symbol show, dimension and label un t
master plan the bU1ld1ng setback on each 3ide of t
parcel/property line that separates the churCh pr~perty f~
the residential property. It is recommended that the setLd
dlmension be labeled aud shown follow1ng the perime~er ot t
open space area identified on the plan wl.th the a~~cefot10n
the folloWing specific satback dimenslon3 fOl- ~he: 1]:lZ.=b.
30uth 20 feet, east 40 feet and west 260 feet. ,::hangti:: t
setback noce for the recreatl.on area to .ind1~ate that the:
ioot setback is for all amen1tl.eS except fer bU1.ldlilQS WU1,
shall follow tIle perirnetel- setbacks.
2. Add to the setback chart the side bu11dl.ng setback io~ tJ
11ltenlal lots.
3. Modify the submittal to 1nclude a survey of the entl.~e Fun
~. specify on the master plan that the proJect shall be platt.
and s1te plan approval is l-equired fOl. a.11 lDlprovement~ nl
included with the plat and construction plans of toe requlr4
1l1pl-ovemen ts .
5. Change the name of the document from "Master Site Plan" '
"Has tel- pI an" .
.
,
t5. Hodify tha pal"king data for the recl-eation ameni t1es
Identify the correct number of 1:equlred parking spaces.
7. It is recommended that the landscaping proposed for the eas'
west and south perimeter buffer easements be changed from OJ
tree every thirty lineal feet plus shru~s twenty four inch I
center to a grouping (4 to 6) small native or moderate drcu~
tolerant trees (minimum height 8 feet) spaced thirty feet I
center and large native (evergreen) canopy trees (minIm
height 8 feet) spaced sixty feet on center plus a continuo
native or moderate drough~ colerant hedge (minimum height
inches) spaced two foot on center. The plan view will depi
the landscape matel"ial in nleandering path 1:ather than
stralght line.
s. Show on the master plan S.W. congress Boulevard connecting
Knuth Road extended~
9. A rev1.ed m..ter plan, wh1Qh reeleQta all .ta~f Qommenta al
conditions approved by the City to~m1s.10n and Plann1nq a:
Dlilve10pment Board, 511a11 be subm1tta<1 in tl-ipll.:acc to t
Plannln9 and Zon1nq Department, prior to ~nitlatlng t
~lattlng proceS3.
10. P;ll-king spac=3 shall be pl'ovid~d on tl1e same lut J.S C
.:1i'121111"1';1 tc bti:: ::.:t2l:'j~Cl.
Page 2
Memorandum No. 95-555
Tal"a oaks
MPMD 95-007
11. Compliance with all applicable comments regarding condition~
of approval of the 1990 rezoning.
12. Compliance with all comments regarding the City's and Pal~
Beach County Traffic Division's analysis of the traffic
statement submitted by the appl icant I s traffic consul tant.
(See Exhibit "A" - letter from Palm Beach County Tl."affic
Division dated September 22, 1995.)
MEH:dim
.xc: Central File
a:Tara2
,
,
.
'W'
.."
E X H I BIT "A"
,
,
.
September 22, 1995
Ms. Tambri Heyden, Director
Boynton Beach Pllnning and Zoning Depart..nt
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.o. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: ., AU OAKS
I'
i / ~ J County Admin
",I'l) , . Robert Weis
; I IU' 1/ tf
I :,/ I ! " .
, L..., , . ' ~~'partment of En
I. -- --.fi?I:':d!!jrf:iiJlc'\ L . and Public \\
, - '--~ ,..u' I
~--..-.. '
Board of County Commissioners
Ken L. Foster, Chairman
Burt Aaronson, Vice Chairman
Karen T. Marcus
Carol A. ~oberts
Warren H. Newell
Mary McCarty
Maude Ford Lee
Dear Ms. Heyden:
P.r Mike Haa,'s request, the Pal. Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the
traffic 1.,act study for the project entitled Tara Oaks, pursuant to the Traffic
PerfonaaDCe Standards in Article 7.9 of the Pal. Beach County Land Development
Code. The proposed project will consist of 192 ..1ti-fa.l1y residential dwell ing
units and a 20,000 square foot church. The study reports this site to be
previously approved for 77 single-f_l1y dwelling 'units. The traffic study
addresses the increase in tt,ffic fro. the proposed project, minus the approved
project. The access paints are all on Knuth Road. The build-out for the project
is 1999.
The traffic study addresses the traffic fro. a church only. W. have been seeing
many of the 1 arger churches are bei ng bul1 t wi th day school and day care
facilities. If the project has these uses, the traffic fro. these uses also
needs to be addressed.
The Traffic Division ha. d.t'~ined that the project ..et. the requirements 0'
the Traffic Perfonaanc. Standards of Pal. Beach County. If you have any
questions regarding this detenaination, ~lease contact.. at 684-4030.
Yvonne Ziel' s letter reco_nds a right turn 1 ane on Knuth Road, at the
residential driveway, if Knuth Road is not extended to the north. While the
projected pe~k hour traffic volume. .eet the County .ini.u. requirements for a
right turn lane, there appears to be a flaw in the logiC.
Right turn- lanes are needed to remove slower turning, traffic fro. the through
traffic flow. If Knuth Road is not extended north, there is no through traffic.
The right turn lane would serve no purpose. When knuth Road is extended to the
north, the traffic would probably be oriented more to the north. There would be
a need for a left turn lane at the residential driveway. There appears to be
only a short Slction of Knuth Road miSSing north of this project. It seems
logical to make the conn.ction to the north in conjunction with this development.
Otherwise there will be a miSSing section of roadway in a fully developed area.
"An EquJI Opportunity - Aifirm,ltivc Action Employer"
..:~
II,,, ::1::::" \''<',11',1I'1111.-,1L11 IIIIri,1.1llllh-I::::<I (Ill:') 1,~I-llIilil
~
."".,
September 22, 1995
Ms. Tambri Heyden, Director
TARA OAKS
page two
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
C) ) I)
,..L.'(v~ ''''~~)I
Dan Weisbergf P~E.
Senior Registered Civil Engineer
cc. Willia. Hukill, P.E., Director
Boynton Beach Department of Development
File: TPS - Hun. - Traffic Study Review
g:\user\dweisber\wp50\tps\boyn52
.
.
.
E X H I BIT
II B II
" ~
" ..".,.
l,'.r
at _:
, ~\
.1:\.,.... ~'
_' ~.._ _''':D ~\
'I-'~"'''''
,..-.-,.... ".
. .~.~~'
..,u- r.~,,;. -;;-' ,
_u :',..: ~ -\
,~.~ ~~. \1..-~.:'i1~ t:-
~ ,: ~_: .. . , . ~,~;. ~ i : h " \t n
~:; I~ j!l"1~t'- ~;.~-,-~~\~\~'.;\llH~\' ~
.:; ~ 9 ;~~ :,1 \ r-: ;~'. i \ l ': H ',1 ~ \ i \ ,u \ \\ 0
*: ~ .."'.. . ''\00 ;.. ......\ '1 .' '\'\ t. 'h.
I;'. 1\1 i~! ;' ,.r'1~"1.' ~\t\"ll"<<;1 V
'H n\:.!, '\,O\~~~Vil \::\\1\'\\ lOt' l'
~:'n ,!~ \ ~''::O~ \' l1~~.. H t. (fI
V (j) i~~ '\>> ' !~;. ~ . \ It. . \ · ~ \ t\ 13
l '.~ -l:! "";',It- ~":.'" ,; ti:l\ll \"ll \let- t:
'al ' ~ .... '4.<< "' \' . '
", h \~\ \l~ ;l.~ \ ~ l~\\\r\ \ '\ \',t ~ \
',r: ill . ! ({I ~ \ r t \ 1 .... ~
~~~\\\~\,~ ~i! \~~\\~ i. h I\ \ ~ 1 . ~ i
n!'!! ,Ill,~ ,~~\ l'> . it 11 1 O'~
~aa' :f' . . \10 ~ li .l\ ' 'tl'
~~l~l~! \; \ \~ ~ ,. \~ \' ~
!itit' ~ U!\ t- \ f\l ~
...t,;, ..~' g) '\ ·
'i" t:~ .' '::~ :- t..
,~n \'l'> " t.,.'_.
i .. Wi ,n '.
: ! i: \
a. \ .~
. t-
'! .
. ,
-;~
. 1
i.hr
~~~~ 1
:~i\~,
:-;l .
,.
..
,,~
.
"-./
...........--
.---..-..
H ~"
,\ !-
J
!\! -
....~ i..:a 1
~~
~.< ~
!:.~ ........-,
~ 0' ..... .... Ii
:.:: .,.. - I "i sl\\~ ..
~ ~ ~ ~ '. ~..." i'. 'U~'\\\\\'i \" \\1~ ..
, ~ 1.\Httl ......_l..i,~~ ~\\!,'t \.... I'
':f ..,..... h\ ,1\ tr"Ul ,,~\.. \L '..i' All.. =
. ........ ~t~\ -I' ,t\: iU 1 II \ i 1\A \ i\lt
~ ~ ie' ~\ .jllin l\~\ I i 1
:;:. ~ l\\~" \i\\\, ,\' \\
;- f.I) \~'lt ?~\ rl'~ \\~\. \ ~ ~ i I. ;~r.ii.
-.-. \ .'s..! i~" · ~ ~ ~
rw ,\1 ~\1 ~ ~~k "t
d ~~1 \., !~! ,-. i , ~ it 1
d ~~\ ~~\ i t.il Ila Il Illll'
'i . ~ - Q'lOl\.
.. ~~ !~ i
\. 1 \ · , i ~ t J t 1 I ~
W ~~ \ 'V-i.H '"il\ ;\\\
~ ~1~ ~\l
-: l 1
~{$\~~
~"i.l,
"1'~ ,
& \1\' ::,1
~ ,J \
,"
~
~
\\ \r
~
.. ,i ~
'\' i,'
, ..
,.\,~ 1
,. .
....;.~
~i~.~.
:1\ :~
1'". u
.
:\ \ \~\ \..~t '
\*1':" r~l\\:
; \ \\t \\\\.: \
1 f \ f t" .
., \ '. (. \.~ '
, ... , \
~ \ n \ \H \ ~ ~
i
---
-~ - .. . .--
E X H I BIT
II C ..
'-' ..""
EXHIBIT "e"
Administrative Conditions
Project name: TARA OAKS PUD
File number: MPMD 95-007
Reference: 2 sheets oreoared bv Kildav and Associates identified
as 3rd submittal with Planninq and Zoninq Deoartment November 14,
1995 date stamo markinq
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments:
l. The applicant at the above site has
requested can pickup for solid waste
disposal and recycling which could
possibly be accommodated, however the
location and accessibility for
servicing must be shown at time of
site plan submittal.
UTILITIES
Comments:
2 . Plan shall show existing utilities on
or adjacent to the tract, and the
proposed points of connection to the
existing water and sewer mains, (LDR
Chapter 3; Art. IV, Sec.3(O).
3. Utility easements between or adjacent
to buildings shall be a minimum of
twenty feet (20' ) or twice the depth
which ever is greater and the utility
pipe shall be a minimum of ten feet
(10') from all structures, [Sec.26.
33(b}].
FIRE
Comments: NONE
POLICE
Comments: NONE
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
4. Completion of Knuth Road must be
accomplished prior to issuance of
first Certificate of Occupancy for any
dwelling unit.
5. Turn lanes (Northbound right turn in
and Southbound left turn in) at Tara
Oaks entry road must be shown as part
of paving documents.
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
6. Site should be platted.
7. Plans should be in compliance with
parking signs and handicap code.
1 of 6
DEPARTMENTS
8. Plans should show established
easements and setbacks as it relates
to townhouses.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
9. One-half credit for private recreation
provided is recommended based on the
following elements:
i. Swimming pool and deck
ii. Game court area
a. Basketball
b. Sand volleyball
iii. Meeting room
iv. Jogging trail
v. Gazebo or garden amenity
10. Recreation dedication requirement:
192 multifamily units X .015 acres =
2.88 acres
2.88 acres divided by 2 = 1.44 acres
recreation dedication requirement.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments:
11. Submit an environmental assessment.
12. Submit a copy of Gopher tortoises
relocation - permit from Florida Game
and Fresh Water Fish Commission.
13. Submit a tree survey with Tree'
Management Plan for entire site.
14. Sheet #2 of recent submittal shows the
1.7 acre "reservation" area. This
area should delineate how the existing
trees (and associated native
vegetation) will be preserved. This
area should be part of comment #13
above.
15. The sheet #2 of recent submittal shows
another tree preservation area as part
of the church parcel. This area
should be addressed in similar fashion
to comment #13 and 14 above.
16. The sheet #2 note about exotic species
of trees indicates that all other
trees will be removed with the exotic
species. The native trees not in the
preservation area(s) that can be
successfully relocated, will be part
of the Tree Management Plan relocation
efforts.
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
2 of 6
INCLUDE
REJECT
~
..."
DEPARTMENTS
17. To ensure that the area within Pod 2
open space is not encroached by a
building or structure, with the
exception of the gazebo, identify on
the master plan a building setback
line following the perimeter of Pod 2.
This building setback line will
terminate at the established building
setback line along the east and west
sides of the PUD on both sides of the
existing parcel line. To further
clarify the location and setbacks for
the gazebo specify on the master plan
a 20 foot setback from the south
parcel line, 40 foot setback from the
west property line and identify the
maximum north/south and east/west
dimension of the structure.
18. Modify the submittal to include a
survey of the entire PUD and renumber
all sheets chronologically.
19. Considering that the City Commission
determined that the required parking
spaces for the townhouse units may be
located in a parking lot rather than
the required two (2) spaces being
provided on each townhouse lot; the
project is required to comply with the
"Particular Requirements" specified in
Article II - Landscape Code, Chapter
7.5 of the City's Land Development
Regulations. Place a note on the
landscape plan indicating that the
project is subject to compliance with
Article II - Landscape Code, Chapter
7.5 of the City's Land Development
Regulations.
20. Submit previous sheet 4 of 4 (buffer
wall and landscaping required north of
L.W.D.D. Canal L-25) and renumber all
sheets chronologically.
21. Modify the parking data for the
recreation amenities to identify the
correct number of required parking
spaces consistent with the Section 11.
16. e. ( 1), ( 4 ) and ( 12 ) ( d) and ( e )
of Chapter 2 - Zoning.
22. Recalculate the size and area of the
basketball court. Correct the data
including the number of required
parking spaces.
23. Show on the master plan the location
of the established setbacks specified
on the plan for the east and west
sides 0:; ,Pod 3.
3 of 6
INCLUDE
REJECT
DEPARTMENTS
24. To show consistency in identifying the
east and west setbacks for the
recreation amenities change the
setback note identified on the west
side of the recreation area from 25
feet to 31 feet. Thirty-one (31) feet
will match the setback specified on
the plan for the east side of the
recreation area. To clarify the
setbacks for the recreation amenities
place a note on the master plan
indicating that the 31 foot east/west
setback is for all recreation
amenities except for buildings which
shall follow the perimeter setbacks.
25. To be consistent with the data
indicated in the analysis of the
traffic report prepared by Palm Beach
County Traffic Division specify on the
master plan 20,000 square feet for the
area of the church located in Pod 3.
26. Modify the Knuth Road right-of-way to
show compliance with the traffic
analysis made by Palm Beach County
Traffic Division and the City Engineer
as follows:
i. southbound left turn lane on
Knuth Road into the project;
ii. Southbound left turn lane on
Knuth Road at the intersection of
Knuth Road and Woolbright Road;
and
iii. Northbound right turn lane on
Knuth Road into the project.
27. Since platting does not require any
review by the Planning and Development
Board, and the City Commission review
does not occur until the end, no
opportunity is available for the
Commission to set land value for the
purpose of calculating the recreation
fee. Therefore, since this request
involves additional fees to be paid
and since the property is under
contract to purchase, it is
recommended the land value be set
using the purchase price at the time
of the most recent sale of the PUD
property. This will require the
applicant to submit a copy of their
purchase contract concurrent with plat
submittal.
28. Revised ~nified control documents
shall be submitted to reflect the
change from rental apartments to fee
simple townhouse units.
4 of.6
INCLUDE
REJECT
,.,
..",
DEPARTMENTS
29. Submission of a rectified master plan
showing compliance with the conditions
of approval for the project will be
required to be submitted to the
Planning and Zoning Department in
triplicate prior to platting and/or
site plan review of the project.
30. Payment of fees for third review is
required at time of submittal of
rectified master plan.
31. Please note: a separate site plan
review will be required for the block
wall and landscape screening required
adjacent to the project and located
north of L.W.D.D. Canal L-25.
32. Do to the close proximity of the
basketball court to the on-site and
off-site residential units, it is
recommended that a note be placed on
the master plan indicating that the
basketball court will not be
illuminated. To lessen the adverse
impact of the use of the basketball
court to the off-site residential
units it is also recommended that nine
(9) gallon evergreen shrub material,
spaced five (5) feet on-center be
installed along the east property line
to a distance of 20 feet north and
south of the length of the basketball
court.
33. To show compliance with the vehicle
use area screening requirements of the
landscape code and provide a
vegetative perimeter buffer the
following landscape improvements are
recommended for the east and west
sides of the residential project
(note: the landscaping required along
the north property line of the project
is subject to the Tara Oaks PUD
property owner and adjacent property
owner's association agreement. The
plans shall describe and show the
landscape buffer consistent with the
specifications identified in the
agreemen t) :
i. omit the landscape buffer
easement along the north, east
and west perimeter of the
residential project - (the
landscape code will require
landscape material to be
installed throughout the pervious
common ground open space area,
therefore, the perimeter
landscape buffer easements are
not needed) .
5 of 6
INCLUDE
REJECT
DEPARTMENTS
ii. change the proposed perimeter
buffer landscaping by omitting
the grouping of three (3) small
canopy trees and two (2) large
canopy trees every fifty foot on
center and replace by showing and
describing a grouping (3 or 4) of
small native and moderate drought
tolerant trees (minimum height
eight (8) feet) spaced forty (40)
feet on center and in every other
.grouping remove a small tree and
replace with a large canopy
native (evergreen) tree (minimum
height 8 feet). The recommended
trees shall be installed within
the pervious common ground open
space area located along the east
and west perimeter of the
residential project. The
proposed continuous native or
drought tolerant hedge (minimum
height 18 inches) spaced two (2)
feet on-center located along the
east and west perimeter is
acceptable. However, the
continuous hedge shall be
extended along south edge of the
recreation facility. Please note
that a minimum of one/half of the
total number of trees and hedges
required to meet the landscape
code specifications shall be a
native specie. Place a note on
the landscape plan indicating the
50% native specie requirement for
required trees and hedges.
iii. Return to the landscape plan the
landscaping and landscape buffers
that were shown on the previous
approved master plan in the area
south of the existing parcel
line that separates the
residential property from the
church property.
MEH/dim
a:ComDepts,TAR/p&d
6 of 6
INCLUDE
REJECT