Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS CITY of ,BOYNTON BEACH ~ @--=- " -. ""' ".." -. ~ .',~-) ~_.-~ 120 N.E. 2nd AVENUE P.O. BOX 310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33435-0310 (305)734-8111 Office of the City Engineer August 15, 1988 Mr. Steven G. Godfrey, P.E. Vice President Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Fl J3407 .Re: Bicycle Path for the Gerulaitis Center and Catalina Multi- Family Projects Dear Mr. Godfrey: Reference is made to your letter of August 10, 1988. For the information of all concerned, I recommend that a crosp- section for the private access road be investigated that would provide within the right-of-way the 8 ft. concrete bicycle path requested, assuming that the L.W.D.D. will not allow the bicycle path in their easement. A graphic representation of the situation as requested above should show how the roadway could be draihed and show the rela- tionship of the roadway with the eight foot concrete bicycle path. Please advise if you have questions concerning the above. RECEIVED Very truly yours, CITY YNTON BEA~H~ ~. t1~- Thomas A. Clark, P.E. City Engineer AUG .1 ij 1988 PLANN.lNG DEPT. TAC/ck -q- cc: Jim Golden, Senior City Planner w/copy of Aug. 10, 1988 letter Don Jaeger, Site Development Administrator w/copy of Aug. letter John Wildner, Parks Superintendent w/copy of Aug. letter '(IT _..-'\1:'.____ -- ------------- ~6r t Kim/ey-Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive, West Palm Beach, FL 33407 . (407) 845-0665 Raleigh, Charlotte. Nashville, Virginia Beach, Washington, Dallas, Phoenix. Stuart, West Palm Be"ch, Tampa, Orlando, Fl Lauderdale, Vero Beach. Fl Myers August 10, 1988 4070T.00(07) Mr. Tom Clark City of Boynton Beach 200 N. Seacrest Boulevard P. O. Box 310 Boynton Beach. Florida 33425-0310 Re: Gerulaitis Center Dear Mr. Clark: Thank you for. meeting with me to discuss the Gerulaitis Center in regard to bicycle and pedestrian facilities. As we discussed, it is impossible for the Gerulaitis Center to provide an 8-foot bicycle/pedestrian facility around the periphery of the site in the Lake Work Drainage District Canal due to current policy of the District. We have developed an alternative approach to accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists separately. The internal road for the Gerulaitis Center will be constructed 28 feet in width, consistent with State standards for providing a wide curb lane for bicycles on street. This is deemed to be the most effective and appropriate way to handle bicycles on site, since the speed and traffic volume on the road will be low. Pedestrians will be accommodated through an interconnected sidewalk system. We have expanded the originally proposed sidewalk system to more completely integrate the pedestrian facilities. Based on our discussion, the sidewalk system will be connected to' a-' future sidewalk on 22nd A venue and a connection will be made south of the lake to the hotel site. This connection will probably be through a stabilize"d pathway. During our meeting, Don Jaeger came in and suggested that there '''las 3. need to connect pedestrian facilities to Congress A venue. We are investigating the possibility of doing this, however, it seems unlikely at this point that such a connection can be made. If a pedestrian connection was to be made between the hotel site and Congress A venue, this should have been requested at the time that the hotel site was being reviewed and approved. Now that the site is constructed, the opportunities for a pedestrian connection may no longer exist. From a practical standpoint, we have integrated the pedestrian and bicycle facilities such that it is convenient for residents in the rental apartment area to walk or ride to the tennis center, the hotel, and the Catalina shopping Center. It seems rather unlikely that residents of the rental apartments would walk to areas south of the Lake Worth Drainage Canal due to the long distance between the apartments and any destinations on Congress A venue. Therefore, pedestrian activity would be minimal or none and thus the inability to create this pedestrian connection should not have any significant negative impacts. Building client relationships since 1967 '[ cr~U:if;jofXJ@71ifJ1 1--- , _._._--~----_.._-----_._._-~_._----- ----------.---. ------. ,.------------- Mr. Tom Clark -2- August 10, 1988 We appreciate the opportunity of discussing this matter with you. It is our understanding that when the matter is reviewed by the Technical Review Committee, in conjunction with the preliminary plat for the project, that you and Don Jaeger will support these bicycle and pedestrian concepts recognizing they provide an effective alternative to the previously requested 8-foot bicycle path. Very truly yours, KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ~~~ Steven G. Godfrey, P.E. Vice President SGG:map Copy to: Dick Critchfield 4070TOO-L081O.sgg M E M 0 RAN DUM July 11, 1988 TO: FINANCE DEPT. ?ROl1: JAMES J. GOLDEN, SENIOR CITY PLANNER \~E: PROCESSING OF CHECKS ..' .. ,.." Att~ched please find the following checks: James Driscol. for Stonehaven MPM, in the amount of $200.0(; Benjamin Aaron, for Glass Bldg. Parking Lot SP, _n the amm 'It)f $300.00; JaIT8S W. McManus, Casa Blanca MP, in the amount )f $400.00, D.U.. Assoc., for Cross Creek Centre, SPM, in the amc,mt of $~~(O.OO; Kc~havarz & Assoc., for Boynton Lakes Plaza SP, Ln the amOl nt of $350.00; A&A Fences, Inc., for Solomon SPOO, in the amount of $200.0, North South Construction Corp, for Catalina SP, in the amount of $300.00; (ck. #5927) North South'Construction Corp, for Catalina SP, in the am()unt'of"$~50.00; (ck. #5928) North South Construction Corp, for Catalina SP1'1 in the am, :un~ 0 E $200.00; (ck. #5926) Coscan, for Quail Run SPOO, in the amount of $20i .00; Land Design South, for Tara Oaks SP, in the arnO'lnt of $290 00. (ck. #1075) . , Land Design South, for Tara Oaks SP, in the arno mt of $60. ; 0 ; (ck. #1073) Rays Auto Storage, Inc., for Auto Save ERC Ferm _ t, in the:imont of $120.00; (ck. #123) Rays Auto Storage, Inc., for Auto Save ERC, in :he amount 0f $80.00; (ck. #116) North South Construction Corp., for Congress La:es MPM, in the amount of $200.00. Account Numbers for deposit are indicated on Hi; backs of:hc checks. ~ t. ~'<. .:r.!JOOES p. GOLDEt, JJG:ro Attachments . ", " 'I! t\.t\': BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 91-262 July 8, 1991 TO: Technical Review Board Members Christopher Cutro Planning Director Vincent Finizio Admin. Coord. of Engineering Ed Allen Fire Chief Ed Hillery Police Chief John Guidry Utilities Director Bob Eichorst Public Works Director Charlie Frederick Parks & Recreation Director THRU: Don Jaeger, Building and Zoning Director~ FROM: Michael E. Haag, Zoning and site Administrator RE: ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY City of Boynton Beach Chlorine Building , 1620 South Seacrest Boulevard Elkins Construction The above referenced project is nearing completion. Prior to the Building Department issuing the Certificate of Occupancy, I would like to ensure that you do not have any outstanding or pending issues concerning this si te that must be rectified (excluding issues that are covered entirely with a city approved surety). If the issues are related to permits issued by the Building Department, please provide this department with the permit number and nature of unresolved issues. If the unresolved issues are not permi t related, notify the owner or the owners agent to ensure that the issues are rectified. Please respond to this office within ten (10) days so that we may proceed to issue the Certificate of Occupancy. Thank you for your cooperation and timely response. J Scott Miller on Johnson, Inspector Kevin Hallahan, Forester File '~\) C~~ ~~ -, , \,' ~o~. ~~\,. . . '\)t.\ ~\~r., ~"'~ ,~- .. ~.... MEH:ald CHLORINE.SDD l t STAFF COMMENTS GERULAITIS TENNIS RESORT NEW SITE PLAN Building Department See attached memo Fire Department See attached memo Engineering Department See attached memo Utilities Department See attached memo Planning Department See attached memo MEMORANDUM TO Carmen Annunziato Planning Director OAT. July 6, 1988 "IL~ ""OM Don Jaeger Building Department 5U8nCT SITE PLAN APPROVAL: GERULAITIS TENNIS RESORT AT CATALINA CENTRE As a condition of site plan approval, the following comments should be incorporated into the related documents by the applicant: 1. Indicate on the plans the proposed type of construction in conformance with Chapter 6 of the Standard Building Code. State if the proposed structures will be fully sprinkled. The proposed square foot areas must comply with Table 400 of the Standard Building Code. 2. All buildings, two (2) stories or more in height, must be automatically sprinkled in accordance with NFiPA 13 as modified by NFiPA 231 and NFiPA 231C. This requirement will be contingent upon Ordinance #88-32 receiving second and final reading from the City Commission. 3. The free-standing sign shown on the plans along Congress Avenue will be considered an off premise sign and, as such, is prohibited by the Boynton Beach Sign Ordinance. 4. Health Department approval is required for any proposed food service within the building. 5. Submit details of the dumpster enclosure indicating location of columns. 6. A buffer wall is required along the western property line. 7. The building is required to be accessible to the handicapped in conformance with State of Florida Handicapped Code. 8. The pool and deck are located on two (2) separate properties. Unity of title between the properties or language relating to ownership of off-site amenities must be provided. 9. Details for the tennis court lighting must be provided. 10. Building overhangs are not permitted to encroach into required setbacks. 11. Fences located within setbacks are limited to a six (6) foot overall height. Sewer and water flow rates, prepared by a registered engineer, must be submitted for the pool, jacuzzi and pool house. The pool must be designed by a registered engineer. Proposed signage must be resubmitted for Board and Commission approval because a sign package is not included in this submittal. The applicant's prompt compliance with the preceding comments will insure a timely permitting process. Memo RE: July Page 12. 13. 14. 15. to Carmen Annunziato Site Plan Approval: Gerulaitis Tennis Resort 6, 1988 Two All plans submitted for public record by a professional registered in the state of Florida must be signed and sealed. DkJ~ DJ:bh XC: E. E. Howell @----.120E.BOynton . - - . "~ ~ P. O. Box 310 . ~~::' Boynton Beach, TO: Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director FR: Debby Davis, Fire Inspector DT: July 7,1988 RE: Gerulaitis Tennis Resort - Catalina Centre Reviewing the plans for Gerulaitis Tennis Resort, it is apparent, the few parking spaces in front of the fire lane access may hinder the fire department. This problem needs to be addressed. ... Q...u.AA M E M 0 RAN DUM July 6, 1988 TO: Mr. Jim Golden Senior City Planner FROM: Tom Clark City Engineer RE: Gerulaitis Tennis Resort COMMENTS: 1. An eight foot concrete bicycle path should be planned to go in the drainage easement on the west side of the property and to continue to Congress Avenue. A permit is required from the Lake Worth Drainage District. 2. Minimum lighting intensities to be shown on the plan at the most remote areas. 3. Paving and drainage plans are noted to be preliminary. Drawings should be complete with all construction details including typical sections and should be signed and sealed. 4. Handicap striping to be blue. 5. Conduit and wiring to be shown for lighting. 6. Stop sign detail is required. 7. Sections should show planter island and catch basins. 8. The cost for street lighting by Florida Power & Light Company on the west side of Congress should be obtained and paid to the City according to current procedures. c-...... / y~.- Tom TAC/ck MEMORANDUM To: Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director Joe C. Swan, P.E. ~~ for John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities ~) ; From: Date: July 6, 1988 Subject: TRB Review - Gerulaitis Tennis Resort - Site Plan We can approve this plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. One of the water meters appears to be connected to a sanitary line. Please correct. 2. Show all easements. 3. Water service lines are to be type ilK" copper. 4. Add a note to the effect that the City will maintain main line sewers only. Show details, including cleanouts, on all service lines. 5. Revise the sanitary sewer detail to conform to the City's new standard. dmt bc: Peter Mazzella M E M 0 RAN DUM July 7, 1988 TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD FROM: CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR RE: CATALINA CENTRE GERULAITIS TENNIS RESORT STAFF COMMENTS Please be advised of the Planning Department's comments in connection with the above-referenced request for site plan approval: 1. This property requires replatting. Any changes to the site plan resulting from preparation of the plat will need to be processed through a site plan modification. 2. provisions will be required at time of platting for shared facilities and cross access integrating the hotel, office/health club and multifamily residential projects. 3. A six foot high buffer wall serving as a continuation of the existing wall on the shopping center site is required abutting residentially zoned property, unless a variance from the Board of Adjustment is granted. 4. To provide continuity and adequate pedestrian circulation among the hotel, office/health club and residential projects an eight (8) foot wide concrete bike path is recommended by the Technical Review Board to be provided along the entire length of the perimeter access road from N.W. 22nd Avenue to Congress Avenue. 5. It is recommended that the landscaping proposed along the perimeter access road within the residential project be continued along the perimeter access road within the office/health club and hotel projects. 6. The sidewalk system shown on the site plan does not correspond to the landscape plan. 7. The loading zone must be relocated closer to the building to be usable and serve its purpose. 8. Lighting details are needed indicating illumination level, wattage, photocell activation, manufacturer's specification and an energy efficient light source consistent with comprehensive plan requirements such as metal halide or high pressure sodium. 9. No scale is indicated on the water and sewer plans. 10. A freestanding sign on the premises would require site plan approval. All other signage for this use would be permitted directly through the Building Department. Off premise signs are not permitted unless a sign variance is applied for and granted by the City commission. 11. Final paving and drainage plans have not been provided. The drainage system must meet the intent of the comprehensive plan in that runoff must be diverted into swales and landscaped areas prior to discharge into drainage structures. -2- 12. At the July 5, 1988 Technical Review Board meeting, the Technical Review Board recommended approval of a revised shared parking study for the existing uses at Catalina Centre Plats No. 1 and 2 and the Gerulaitis office/health club resort based upon the methodology presented. One hundred ninety four parking spaces are required for the office/health club and 95 have been provided. The methodology evidenced the opportunity for sharing to occur between the hotel and the office/health club at the 1:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. weekday peaks. The recommendation for approval was contingent upon revised documents being submitted substantiating a 10% buffer. The revised shared parking study provided is not acceptable in its current form and will need to be revised at the time of final sign-off. A marked up copy indicating detailed comments and the changes needed is available to the applicant and traffic consultant in the Planning Department. It appears that the required 10% buffer can be met. , C~N .S:-ANN~IAT~ CSA:ro cc Central File MEMORANDUM To: Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director(~ol~ Utilitie~ From: John A. Guidry, Director of Date: June 21, 1988 Subject: Gerulaitis Tennis Resort We offer the following comments on this site plan: 1. Clarify the purpose of the 8" x 4" tees in the water main. 2. Clarify sanitary and water services to the building, specifying their size, materials and details. 3. We require a minimum 10 foot setback from Manhole No.9. 4. Indicate all utility easements. 5. Trees are not permitted within utility easements without specific written approval from this department. 6. A minimum 5 foot clearance is required between hydrants and shrubs. 7. The water main on the south side of the parcel is currently 10 inch diameter and should be extended as such. dmt bc: Peter Mazzella 1tl1CE1\1~n j'l' 2,2 l~o \)~y1. i>v.t-l~\~G - ;~ - -' . -------' .~~- -) MEMORANDUM June 15, 1988 TO: TOM MCMURRAIN FROM: JAMES J. GOLDEN, SENIOR CITY PLANNER RE: GERULAITIS RESORT AT CATALINA CENTRE Please be advised of the Planning Department's comments in connection with the above: 1. Wall detail for dumpster enclosure should indicate a height of 6 feet. 2. A 6 foot high concrete block wall is required abutting residential zoning. 3. A site plan modification will be required to show shared improvements with the existing plat no. 1 hotel site, including driveway connections, removal of parking spaces, and the sharing of the lap pool and walkways. It is recommended that this modifi- cation be submitted concurrent with the proposed tennis resort. 4. This property requires platting. It is recommended that the preliminary plat be submitted concurrent with the proposed tennis resort. 5. A unity of title and a cross parking/access agreement will be" required for sharing of facilities and integration of this site plan with the hotel site plan. 6. The total gross floor area for the office/resort is shown to be 57,946 square feet on the site plan application. The parking calculation for professional offices and the health club is one (1) parking space per 300 square feet of gross floor area (Section 11-H.16.d.(20) and e(B) ). All related outdoor ancillary facilities to the resort, such as the lap pool and tennis courts, will not require additional parking as they are ancillary to the principal (resort) use. The shared parking allocation should be revised based on the above. It would appear to be appropriate to calculate separate parking accumulation curves for the offices and the resort, as they would appear to exhibit different peak parking demands. A discussion of this should also be included in the report. 7. The previously approved shared parking allocations for the plat no. 2 shopping center and Marie Callender's restaurant are based in part on a 75,000 square foot office building occupying the parcel where the resort is proposed. Since the office building is to be changed to a combined office/resort complex, the statistical data and buffer calculations for all existing uses have been modified. The report submitted for the resort does not include an updated version of the previously submitted documentation for the existing uses. This documentation should be submitted and the revised data incorporated within a single comprehensive document. -2- 8. Comprehensive engineering drawings are required for site plan approval. Preliminary drawings of a conceptual nature are not acceptable. 9. The intent of the Comprehensive Plan development policies for pretreatment of stormwater runoff from paved parking areas is that it be diverted over a grassed area prior to entering an inlet structure. The proposed drainage scheme is not acceptable with respect to these policies. 10. It is recommended that a loading zone be provided for this use consistent with Section Il-J of Appendix A, Zoning. 11. An on-site traffic flow plan is required, including pavement markings and traffic signs. 12. Some type of sidewalk or other pedestrian walkway should be provided to connect the proposed multi-family project with the resort. ~~~ JJG:ro cc Carmen- S. Annunziato Tambri J~ Heyden Susan O'Rourke Central File M E M 0 RAN DUM June 6, 1988 TO: Mr. Jim Golden Senior City Planner FROM: Tom Clark City Engineer RE: Site Plan, Gerulaitis Tennis Resort COMMENTS: 1. Roadway construction for access road to be shown and detailed and identified with respect to R.O.W. 2. Paving and drainage plans to show elevations, construction, drainage and drainage calculations all in accordance with the Parking Lot Ordinance 3. Extruded curbs on top of asphalt are not acceptable. 4. Drainage structures are not allowed in paved areas. 5. Lighting intensity should be shown on plans. 6. All landscaped areas and paved areas to be dimensioned with set back dimensions from property lines or buildings. 7. L~ghting plans should include wiring circuits. 8. Survey should show the Access Road R. O. ~'l. 9. Traffic control devices should be shown, including pavement markings. ~ y ~ t!f~ Tom Clark TAC/ck RECEIVED JUN 8 1988 p\.AN~\NG o~~t" -- - .,. '.... '~:J :- 5' .... .(i ;~ 'f.: :;~ \,,, .... ,~. MEMORANDUM 2 June 1988 TO: Peter L. Cheney, City Manager FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato, Planning Director RE: Gerulaitis Tennis Resort - Catalina Club On May 31 and June 1 of 1988, the Planning Department received an application for site plan approval which provides for the construction of the above-mentioned project on a part of the remaining, undeveloped portion of the Catalina Club/Congress Lakes Planned Unit Development (PUD) (see attached location map). The applicant in this regard is C & R Developers, Inc."and Tom McMurr~an is the applicant's agent. Upon review of the site plan, the Planning Department concluded that the plans, as submitted, are not consistent with the approved Planned Unit Development zoning, and master plan, and further that a violation to the City's subdivision regulations may have occurred. In order to better understand these issues, a review of prior development approvals is provided. In 1982 the City Council approved an annexation, plan amendment and rezoning which provided for the development of the Congress Lakes Planned Unit Development. Congress Lakes was bisected in a north/south manner by NW 22nd Avenue with 524 units planned north of NW 22nd Avenue and 736 units planned south of NW 22nd Avenue. Also proposed within the PUD was a major private recreation facility a~ NW 22nd Avenue and Congress Avenue, southwest corner, and a network of public roads which provided access to the Planned Unit Development and connected Congress Avenue to NW 22nd Avenue, south of NW 22nd Avenue. Several parts of the PUD were subsequently platted and developed, including Mahogany Bay and Post Landings north of NW 22nd Avenue. The projects north of NW 22nd Avenue provides private recreation on-site. With respect to the Congress Lakes site plan (that portion of the PUD remaining south of NW 22nd Avenue) Phase 1 was platted and two buildings were constructed, then the project was abandoned and put up for sale. In 1985 Ocean Properties proposed that a portion of the remaining, undeveloped Congress Lakes PUD be rezoned to accomodate a Holiday Inn Hotel, an office building and a shopping center. This rezoning of 26+ acres of land was approved and resulted in the reduction of-211 multi-family units and two acres of neighborhood commercial land uses. The remainder of the undeveloped PUD which consisted of 525 units, a collector road, and the master recreation area on approximately 44 acres was sold to C & R Developers, Inc. To date, the C & R property has remained unplatted and undeveloped. with this explanation of prior development approvals in mind, it is now appropriate to evaluate the current Gerulaitis Tennis Resort against the remaining approved uses and master plan requirements in the undeveloped portion of the PUD. , According to the approved master plan, three major elements remain to be developed on the 44 undeveloped acres. These are the master recreation area, a public collector road which currently exists in part along the north side of the shopping center and is to be continued to NW 22nd Avenue to align with the entrance to Mahogany Bay, and the 525 units of multi-family housing. With respect to the master recreation center, this proposed use is no longer an appropriate use of land because each of the two existing residential developments (Mahogany Bay and Post Landings) has provided on-site recreational facilities which meet the subdivision regulation requirements. Therefore, it becomes apparent that the remaining 525 units should be spread across all of the remaining acreage. This conclusion is arrived at because the total unit count in the PUD was based on the gross acres in the PUD including the master recreation center when the PUD was approved in 1982 (112 acres x 11.18 dwelling units per acre = 1260 units). The Gerulaitis site plan fails to take into account this feature of the approved PUD. In fact, the Gerulaitis plan excludes that portion of the PUD lying north of the shopping center, while utilizing all but 21 of the approved remaining dwe~ling units as follows: . 525 units approved but not developed 504 units proposed on Gerulaitis site plan 21 units remaining but not allocated It is unreasonable to assume that these remaining 21 units are going to be built on the 7.89 acres remaining in the PUD. The reason given for this exclusion of land, is that C & R Developers, Inc. is no longer the owner of the portion of the PUD lying north of the shopping center. The Planning Department has confirmed this fact with C & R's attorney. This sale of property may constitute a violation of the City's subdivision regulations, because the creation of a parcel wherein the dedication of public roads is required is technically not allowed without the benefit of filing a subdivision plat, and all lands within PUD's must be platted. The final item remaining to be addressed is the collector road which connects NW 22nd Avenue with Congress Avenue. This road was planned and approved in connection with the rezoning to PUD in 1982. Traffic, land use and construction decisions were made based on this road serving the PUD at the assigned location. The Geru1aitis site plan ignores this proposed road at its assigned location, and proposes instead a private driveway intersecting NW 22nd Avenue at the western property line. This not only violates the approved PUD master plan, but also results in a dangerous series of intersections as it conflicts with the driveway to the north which serves Mahogany Bay. To summarize, the Gerulaitis site plan is inconsistent w~en compared to the approved master plan for the Congress Lakes PUD in the following ways. 1. The site plan ignores the approved configuration of land uses in the PUD. 2. The site plan misallocates density by utilizing all but 21 approved units leaving these 21 units to be developed on 7.89 acres which is unreasonable to assume will occur. 3. The site plan does not conform to the approved' system of roadways. 4. A violation of the subdivision regulations may have occurred by the selling off of the parcel of land north of the shopping center. For these and other reasons such as a shortage of approximately lOa! parking spaces on site and incomplete engineering and utility plans, the Planning Department will not be able to process these plans for approval. '- L- - -..-. - ( (( A-~ CARMEN S. AN~NZIATO /bks , \ \ \ , NGRESS LA;ES/~A T AUNA CLUS\\ PUD 'i . , . _ _ ..".....u.fu.~{.. I __ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __ _-- _ _ _ . .,-._ .....w..........u.w...... , ------- -- -- -:.- --- -------= - 1 :i . ~'\;i l""~.' p. T ,~I , ' o :, - . : , : . : , - . . ...........: , : . : , . - . : I : . : , AVS}../VE UI: · ...II........I...........~ ~ . . , : : : ::' : .~ :, ""<11" - ,., I <II" .~ ~ ::p ........ : ~ .:. 7.89 ACRES: IlJ ~ :~ - . - . ... H. ...{ - . . _ .M - .~, '\. ..u.......J i - . t . '\ ,--.... I.' · ,., t---< . · I : I .,---,: f .' r---- . · .." \ :', I-'- --i : f"""~ ::: ~: PROPERTY; 5\ ~5 I .' . · \ '., ---i · : : ( : , " .' ----4 .. , . ( . - ., : , . . : , . ~ : , . . : , . . . : , : . : \ . . I . , \\ . , . , -----.... .. j \ \ \ \ \ \ w C & R'S '- -22 ~ - ......-. ---- .--- - _._-------------~ ... tmE1.=-_':~~::'.,-: I . , \ crran ~ : I I I I I t I ' I' I I I I 'I I I I I ~\: I ; I I , I : " : I \ \ I I \ I ~ I _________.1 ( i:~.w. -;,:p: - -13.0 y"N- -i- ON - --------.. ------ -- -----,..--- 1/ ~ .I~ pj ~ TENNI ~ ............... ----C-:- 16 - - - - .--..... - - - - - - - - CANA L' ..,.----- -~-\ I , ,. I I \ I I I NOT TO SCALE !. l ~ ~~ I! MEMORANDUM June 2, 1988 TO: FINANCE DEPT FROM: JAMES J. GOLDEN, SENIOR CITY PLANNER RE: PROCESSING FEES Attached please find the following checks: Plum Beach Capital Corp, for Cas a Lorna, Central Business District, in the amount of $100.00; James McManus, for Cas a Blanca Apts, Master Plan, in the amount of $400.00; Wendall Collins, for Mariners way, SPM, in the amount of $200.00; MSM, for Citrus Glen, SF, in the amount of $200.00; Lakes, of Tara, MFM for fence, in the amount of $200.00; Donald Macneir for Sunshine Square (Anthony's), SF, in the amount of $200.00; Bavarian Restaurant, SFM, in the amount of $200.00; D.R. Assoc., for Cross Creek Centre, SPM, in the amount of $200.00; North Sout~ Construction Corp., Gerulaitis Resort, SP, in the amount of $300.00; Gene A. Bernard & Assoc., for Meadows Square, SPM, in the amount of $200.00; Bryan Reynolds Assoc., for Homing Inn, SPM, in the amount of $200.00. Iro ~i~i1f ~... . _,' "'f~1'~'"H,\..f,:~'~ ~~. :--,,1'~\~~~-~"-;:'."_\"':;''''" -/- - /' . . ~ ". "'~'. ;t;~"'''''':~.1 ' ' , --" ~'l_1 -' i - e April 30, 1985 ----- -~ ~~.: ._:~ ~ :.. A .~_... .. .;...., !' .. .....- ,: \. #. I :. !; MAY 1~~5 c << ~..# MEHORANDUH TO: Mr. Peter L. Cheney, city Manager r~. r"ll".:..... ":.. . ". :,..:-...... .:. '.- '..: ._~...... rr:,~:~J r~?~ _:_C,. FROM: Tom Clark, City Engineer ...f;,.... \. 0- ~"- -. - Re: T.R.B. review of the varL:mce request submi.tted by Walboyn Development (Catalin~ Center) for the collector road to the adjacent subdivision. (Allan ciklin's letter of April 24, 1985 to Mr. Cheney) Reference is made to the subject variance request'which will be con- sidered ata public hearing scheduled by the Council for the meeting of May 7,1985 as advertised in the Post on April'29, 1985. The T.R.B. met today, Tuesday, April 30, 1985 to consider the said :equest as ~rovided for in the Subdivision Regulations (Article XVI). The T.R.B., after reviewing the preliminary schematic drawings for the Catalina Center~ Mr. Ciklin's letter and Exhibit "A" of said letter; and after taking into account the provisions for variances as provided by the Subdivision Ordinance agreed to consider two options for recommendations to the Council as listed below. 1. Approval of the variance request subject to the dedication of a 60-ft. minimum right of way dedicated to the public along the alignment as proposed in Exhibit "A"; a provision for a left turn lanemfor northbound traffic exiting onto Congress with County approval; and provision for a traffic signal when warr- anted at the intersection with Congress Avenue. 2. To disapprove' the variance request and to require that an 80-ft. collector street dedicated to the public extend through the project in a central location to serve the Catalina P.U.D. property to the west that would be consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance. The T.R.B. agreed to recommend Option No.2. " TAC:mb Y/CL .~ - d~[ Torn Clark t- cc: Carmen Annunziato , I t . - o '. MEMOR~NDUM April 30, 1985 TO: Mr. Peter L. Cheney, City Manager FROM: Tom Clark, City Engineer Re: T.R.B. review of the variance request submitted by C & R Developers, lnc. for the Catalina Club Property. (Albert C. Blanchard's letter of April 29, 1985 to Mr. Cheney) Reference is made to the subject variance request which will be considered at a public hearing scheduled 'by the Council for the meeting of May 7, 1985 as advertised in the Post on April 29, 1985. The T.R.B. met today, Tuesday, April 30, 1985 to consider the said request as provided for in the Subdivision Regu- lations (Article XVI). The T.R.B. agreed that a recommendation not to approve the subject variance request be made. ':.. -=-~-~ -c:f/~ Tom Clark TAC: rob " -----~_. ..... .... ,/ -. ...1-' ti \:; :' '. Ii""'.' .:/1 ";".:J'%~>,. . \) ...- (.. 1.1~ .- ...... /1)". "... .... ~ : : ' ......,~ rl~'j : j~.l: 1I~:::.... . :. ""..(.1;l'.,...:: . ., ~:.~..1:;,.::.~.... ~':J ... .... . ......._ \i.,;J<v',-, (' \~.~.;. C". .~ ~. c , <..&' ./ . .- ~ e I t ~~- ~CZJ/AltJl ni,.e #~,d ~ Km~" ~~ Jf/-t~6 \.. ~<<--1 MINUTES-REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 7, 1985 payment of $8,178.27 to Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc., for services rendered on the Reverse Osmosis project. The motion carried 5-0. PUBLIC HEARING Consider conditional use approval for the Tiny Scholar Nursery School, 2304 South Seacrest Blvd., submitted by Ken Carlson. (It will be necessary to open and then continue the Public Hearing since final recommendations have not been received from the Planning and Zoning Board) Public Hearing will be continued to May 21, 1985 at 8:00 p.m. Mr. Cheney said we had requested that the Tiny Scholar Nursery School application be advertised for a Planning and zoning Board Meeting, but the newspaper did not advertise it. It will, there- fore, be considered at the Planning and Zoning Board's June meeting. Vice Mayor Ferrell moved, seconded by Councilman Warnke, to delete this item from the Agenda and place it on the Council's Agenda for June 18. The motion carried 5-0. ~public Hearing for variance in reference to platting which ~requires the continuation of streets to unplatted property and in reference to dead end streets extending beyond 1,320 feet in length. Variances are to Appendix C, Subdivision and Platting Regulations, Article X, Section 10 and section 100 of the Code of Ordinances. (Walboyn/Catalina Project) Mr. Alan Ciklin came before the Council to represent Ocean Properties, the developers of the Walboyn project, regarding access to the property at the rear of their project. They have worked with the City staff, the County Engineer and the City Attorney; it was agreed they would seek a variance to the sub- division regulations so they submitted a proposed access way to the C & R property behind Walboyn. The County Traffic Engineer confirmed that an 80-foot collector road is not necessary to serve the C & R project and that a 24-foot access road expanded to 30 feet as it enters Congress Avenue would be acceptable. Mr. Ciklin said they are agreeable to these requirements and to Mr. Cheney's comments in his memorandum of May 7, 1985, except that he would like clarification of his remark regarding the number of curb cuts. Mr. Cheney read his report giving the history of this p~ojectand recommendations of conditions for granting the requests f~~ variance, having reviewed reports by the Technical Review~~ and the County Traffic Engineers. He said they feel the number ,L:. of points of access to the 24-foot East/West roadway betwee~f"f_ I Congress Avenue and the residential property behind the hot~5 198~ project should be limited. Mr. Ciklin did not feel ~t wa~~G'O~ necessary to reduce the number of curb cuts so drast~call~~!>l~'!"IVG"nEFT:.-" " .~., \ -41 ~ --,-,.- ---. - 8 - e I ~ e I , MINUTES-REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAY 7, 1985 the number of trips on the access road would be minimal and it would create a hardship for them in placing their hotel on their property and providing adequate parking spaces. The proposed plan had shown 11 curb cuts; there was discussion as to whether the number should be reduced to eight, five or two. Councilman Zimmerman thought the roadway should not be built there at all along the canal and coming out on Congress Avenue next to the bridge. He described a situation at the south end of the City by the sewer plant where problems have been encountered and the County has required that the road be relocated. It was concluded there is no ideal solution to this access problem. Attorney Vance said the plan presented here is the best effort given the parameters they had to work with; if the variance is granted, it solves the problem in relation to maintaining the sanctity of the subdivision standards. Vice Mayor Ferrell moved, seconded by Councilman Hester, to approve the variances requested by both Ocean Properties and C & R Developers with the stipulations of City Manager Cheney's memo of May 7, 1985, with 2.a. stating "Not more than five curb cuts to the access drive from the motel area." and all of the cuts to be eliminated from the west end of the property. A roll call was taken by Mrs. Boroni as follows: Mayor Cassandra Aye Vice Mayor Ferrell Aye Councilman Hester Aye Councilman Warnke Aye Councilman Zimmerman No The motion carried 4-1. 45 Foot Height Limit Mayor Cassandra read what was on the ballot when the referendum was passed in March of 1982 regarding height limit, as well as his memo describing what is in the Code Book regarding this sub- ject. Vice Mayor Ferrell said our ordinance is very clear cut, but he asked Attorney Vance if a policy could be set stating to what extent exceptions would be granted. Mr. Vance said a policy should not be set which does not comply with the ordinance, as the ordinance itself states what exceptions can be granted for and allows the Council to consider each application. Councilman Zimmerman added that the ordinance cannot be amended without a referendum. Mayor Cassandra said he would like to have a State Attorney's opinion regarding the difference in what appeared on the ballot and what is in the Code Book. Attorney Vance said State Statutes limit the ballot to 15 words, but the ordinance was available at the time and was advertised in the newspapers in its entirety. Mr. Ben Uleck again came before the Council and said there were over 2,000 petitions from individuals who wanted a strict limit - 9 - .~ - (( (( , (/In 7~) ~ zI~tP/d AGENDA May 7, 1985 VI. PUBLIC HEARING . B. Walboyn/Catalina Project (Ocean Properties and C & R Developers ,Ine. ) Access Variance The property foz:merly known as the Catal~ Club and located on the west side of Congress Avenue, both north and south of 2200 Avenue, is 'OC1W being divided into three pieces as follows: . -I 'j/' / 1. A POD project north of 2200 Avenue. ~~ r 2. A lIIOtel, oonvention center and retail project sout;h of 2200 Avenue and facing on Congress Avenue to be developed by Ocean Properties. . 3. A POD on ranaining land to the rear of the Ocean Properties land, to be developed by C & R Developers, Inc. At the City Council Meeting of April 2, 1985, in connection with review of rezoning, the City Council approved in principal the'motel/convention center/retail project concept and zoning proposed by Ocean Properties, and instructed the staff to find solutions to the problem of providing access to the POD to the west. A review of the subdivision regulations which require acces~ to unplatted pro- perty at the time of subllvision, detenni.ned that no solution was possible without two variances being granted by th~ Mayor and City Councii, one for each property. Variance requests were sul:mitted by the two affected properties (Ocean Properties and C & R Developers, Inc.). 'Ihese variance requests were reviewed by the TecPnical Review Board and that review identified access problans which, in 'the '!'RBIs ju:iganent, will not be ideally resolved by the pro- posal contained in the variance requests. In light of the City Council action on April 200, after reviewing the TRB report, and after reviewing reccmnendations fran the County Traffic Engineering Division, I reccmnend the following in regard to the request for variance: 1. Approval of the prOposed limited access to the properties off Congress, Avenue, north of the Boynton Canal Bridge (north bound left turn into t.'1e property, south bound right turn into property and right turn only out of property). This limited access and median cut has been approved tJ~;~ (p Uf_: ;::Y;;:;;;;iM. I ~7::;~~~~. U1IlJ--~ -lD dlft- --.6; iD=- cf--/~ ~~ ( /" '''; ./' '- -- '. -2- l\) p 2. Approval of the 24 foot drive as proposed to serve as the access to the C & R Developer's POD to the west with the following conditions: a. NJt mx,S ~ ~ curb cuts to the access ~ive fran the rrotel . area.(~ e::;i) - b. Granting by Ocean Properties of a pezmanent easement for access to ' I the POD property in the rear. c. Acceptance of maintenance of this access aisle by Ocean Properties. 3. Construction to approved standards and dedication -to the City of the right-of-way at the northern end of the property which will provide acccess to the POD (C & R Developers, Inc.).' . 4. As required at the April ,200 City Council meeting, filing of the plat of the Ocean properties parcel. These matters will again be addressed at the time that ~ h;~ nlahs are subnitted. by Ocean Properties and C & R Developers, Inc. &f~~ City Manager PIC: sr .. . z o '" ..; :r . :5m ^ - ::~ ~~~ ~. - ;f~ .. _. Q. DQ.~ " . . ~ ~ . ~ 0 . . ~ 0., V> o c ..; :r ~ 10 "HHP .; ~ . '/, ':i / t).. , \ \ ,. ~. ,~ I J ~. \ ,~, 'I I Il,- '(' ,.--"__, ~._ _-L~:':.J..-__ rl~~Hi; gl ,h~l~~ ~~ "!.H~l~, -,~ h~ ~~-I~ ~ " >. <<I ~~ ~~ ~ , (lQ ::r - 3' (lQ o ?~ ~'" ~~ \ I t1 ~ o c: 3 " '" - ~ ,.,., ::l r"l o '" S; <l> o <l> ,,- ~ ~. ",- ~ , . . \ ~ I, P]';' f ~ i i I r. I 111' ~n. , '-r '" ~ &'f~ ~h.'~ ~~~~ ). ; '~. , i' I 1 '~ l ' o r :~~. U"I J ,...,., ; e ~~. \.lI or ., ~ ~ ;: :r- I-' ;0 00 ~:;z r"l t"'n ~ '" - - - ~. :r o. (""f'" ::l ,...... (7.1- I " , ~ C"'l U"I ;;: r"l " '" =r <l> ;:;' ~ V> V'1 W r"l 0 0 '" fO .... 0 0 ;; Z <l> g - ::r :!'! - ,'~ 1I_ , ' ~III~~' !l1j li!W1 ~. j::;.in:.~! ~ E1ilWl ~ n ~. j I 'j't:; '!'''If-! ~I'.~'!!il , Ii I;' ~ i ~ II ~ ~H;;:r: ~ fHH Ii :' 0 f I ~ . .J ! I I I m.;1 i ! !:I I '" _: " I I~~ II ~ ~ ~ ~:~:l~ r'j lA~i ti ~ !i~~' '" "~~lJ 1~1,..... M.t.I?:~~ .tlll:h .. ~ .. lj,' ..,.". f,~-~'~ ~1!~l.l.ll.1Wj.l ~.j.l. f I I i ~.. M~~~;~ ~ ~:~M: ~ ~ ~ eteu:::t <l> ~ \~ ..~ ~l \ ~ ~~) II:. f ',\ 1~ \r~ ,~ t ,q 1," ~.~ ~Z w! am flth :.~~1i ~f-~~! ~;~i J!l i J~n: ~~ ~ }i!! 'II! ~.;! ~ ' L: i {! lriI ~1 l{~~ _______._1 !'. =- rr. i 11rl111 ~ , . ,i; I ~ L-16 Boynton Canal --------------------~---sa~51~7.w-------------- - .......'Z.S6' -..'J ---:- r- '" ::l 0. '" r"l <l> '" f'l " .... <l> '_..'_ ~, r"l' :::1'" . ;:: . . ro r"l .... o ~ ::l ~ )> ;:; :::I" ~. .~",?p...o~ - '-~,<..~ .................,- (') i>I ~ 5' '" ,.,., ::l (r.: '" ~ :r o 0. i>I -< 5' ;:) o ,..., ~ 0' ::l ~ ~ -0 f'l o " ~ ~ .... .. "" ~ ." C: ~ .... .. 1<' .. '" r I L- -c ~ """ 3' CI'O r- ~ I; ~l~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ Ur>- n ::~. :';'J, ~ t ~: ~ tll .:.. t: 1 ~~ q :tin t'\Iff'~ !!i ,..,,'.-Y " " .j ~ I~' - " " ll' 5 \ 1\\ ~ ~ ;II · ;; i +- o ~ ~ r L( \. !!! 11 ~'i I' ! ~I~:lll ;; ,... ciQ' e~=~i~~~ :T .. 5' OIl 0 Z ::I~ . .. 0 ~Ill '" 1'::: -I :r 0- 0 VI 0 C c 3 -I 'tl '" :r i ~ "' ~l li ~a ~ l~ n . w 0' ~;:i' '" ~ H l"1 c ~i... ;;; .- - ;rt 0 ~!t III ,. ~1 · .w' ".. . \f ~ ~2 ~~ -::00 At ~ ~ ~~~ ~ .-3~ ~: 0..- .t=EJ,..... ~~ 00 z- ;;,~ Q z p; .~ - ~8-= g ,...... :o(}:l t:"'>;1 0:l o :0 .-3 A ~ I'D .., OT ::> ..:,1 ..i' z g :r VI n III ii' ~ .... o { I lit II ." II , II III . pi !!! I! 1"11 uml,11 ftllen, il.1 ~ II 1 .11,11.1 1,.11, I III I ,1 ' .. 'Iii fH1llt = It !Ii ] Jill.iii :r U!ffllf:CIr.~' It" '! !lji4l~r.;lrI~~ I:! 01 i U'~li'l!~rnjl~ !!. I '1I'I~:Il!f1 "I J?: 0 I!f'IIJ!:,:lJ,1111 f'I' ~ . f :I,-lj'lIt Iff J Q r :;!I'li~fOOlliq.: j I !J~m;r1'.J -" fJj o' f I' '.al~'~ '.' If' ::J J '.II ~.'.. '.' l'f!'I!m."IU "1 l-16 Boynton Conol I ,. ,... I'll 'w' I /fill W" II ci} I'f" ~glf 1111, ' J:~ I~ ~. 11,'!1 ~ii{ I IN i~iJ tj ~ 'I'! ~1!lJ I!i I ,hP! &. i Iii,:' ! I til, f- ,f 111- !III ____________~~! 1 ,III . ,... (> 0 ~ ;:; ~ Q. :T ::J ~ ;' ~ 'tl a ~:\ :~~~~ t.fU I" ~.~, ~ 'I r t ~ 'f~ rh~~ ll~J '.. ~ t ,\ ~ "'~I' ..i~ ~ 'l: ~~.l ., +- .;. nil ,I! f - j j;' OQ :r III ~ t M 'r I~ : I, t t~ ~ I ~: -- ---f."s7";-;l.W------------ (j ~ I>> :; I>> H 1\ j" f Ii r :c g, 0- I>> -< ~ :. It . il~\.r ; ,....., ~~"~ .. ...:. ~ I' I . i:S i .1 l r'l o ::I .. ~ .. ... :: :v ~ !=l ~ .; I. ..- o r"> ~ o :I · 3:: '" "0 ~ er .,... " 01 ,... S i' ~ i' , ... ~.'. ...... . j' " ~~~. - - -- : ~ . - -HUOC~YY-~tJ ~OAD ~:~~ '=~'~ - .~CCCC=.-' t h - ~ "'-=1... R >- LUll J ~ ~ - == A " "JJ ,.., ~"A . 1 15.0 ) ,'., . ~ ffn~ LOCA TIO~E~~~E ~ ~ tL..p-Jr.. 9A T ALINA _. __ _ ._ __, / ,~j': "', - -) s:o Q I-- ,,.... f-1. )-;- \rn ~~'~Jt;; '. - am: ~YNTON - ~;., I r f:f\~ (""E~~ - s~':'.. ~~~"I<:\" <~r' - "\.'l~ ::R~~G ~~ ~ \ /~ \!1m il Qrll-U'~~~ _ ~ STATE s" ~;~~~;~\~~i; rd~ ~r y ~1AA - ~ -:111 E ~ rtA )' ~ I~~, q r I ...'* ' '. ,,8.~1 ~,,~'"' . U Ii,,' ! G)' GLS.l ~ NOT h, ~I~ 1=, IN. '" 1 .r? ~ it.fe' CITY ~ _F.1i(. _r;:r rY ''',,' ~ ~ _ m!.:..~ "MELEAR PROPERTY" ~ ~ /I. ; I rrr ~~ ~ 't! " · '. . ~ ^ ^ ". I E ~;~ I rr .,~,J,.{ N -. ~ "" ~ I l.!)~ 'Vi' I ,I : I . - , :t I r-, , ; ~ '''PUC LUt:4.00 ! r.J~1 rr1 _1.l~~111111111111 ~ I L ~ 411 Dill %dStiJltsigr C:3 \ J ~REVISED CATALINAlm ~ ~CLUB P U 0 ~"""""'W""'" . t-::-. . . . ~::.:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: " - ,4 "'-":':~~:~:': :::::::::::::::::::::'~:::::::::::::::. , l'L~___ 'p HA S E 2 ;:::: .COMMER IAL PIC 5, A '" ~V E LOP iii E_N':}R~Y~~CCNC~:;"~"..~E" If ~- ..~"""'.v,;...'". . -~- , -:..-' ..-~-'.B..oiiifiiiL'"'''' ..... '-CAAJil.' - '-- 1/ L nn....J ~ ___! -- PHASE 3S, ". R1AA TEN.NIS RESVRT : '- , ~ J-j ~I l.U ...l- ~f='t' /--- R E C I; R t--. Pip , '- .-- P H A ~ COM - DEV~ d ( =~ 1 . ERCIAl' OPMENT ,~--.- i I ,.:~~ ..., I , 111 rei ...nr , 1-'-""'7' _ Fnnrrrmnrfllt'8lrnm- F ~~I I" 1 _ 11/1/1il T f MIlEScrY o 400 800 JES'!''7) "'t. 9/'Ih.... C3 i im~ 't---: . ~ ::' : F I!,-~"i , ...., ,., - \J I c~ J.- r " I- , =-=~'I r---- .-. RoAn \1 't: T ~ _ .. ~ ~ ~ I=' 1 R31'-:..:..: 1fT I-l .'1..'" . f-'~ ,. ~/! ,'-~>. i ~ 11 J [l t l..fx J))~ .. - - 1 ,n .> .::<(..,..,....... "'~, I ,-- "\., I TT~ 'R2 : if ~--- ~ _: lH~ '- ~ ~. ~ · - !:!4 I' 11 [B R -...i ~ ~"~'r 'r,;.. ~ It 'ili; ;..i. l~ IfIO 'PI! .oc ~ .__' ~"A, ." RTVIT: ~.". ro~~~,," .,,~.~. IT'. ,. \ .=-.J C '~ll,'j~l c r fr~:'''' ~,;JJ f~'~' !!!*~;;:l lI!.1 .'. :~1. I;"~ .: fJC~' ~ .o..r.:..: : ~':JJ lit 11[1 ~:'1 114".("1' f ,;' [f~. I /" ~~~;. '1~tf0lI";;'~~dj :yg~:;ir " ~ I iO'l1 :11:" ~ J ~ r1lEia ~f'~~:"'T ffi IT. f I I j I F:., ,.J /( -J'" ~!~ " ' tT"\ ~ ' -....,.)L '\ _,~'-~ ,~. (J......:.... ~ :, ~): ({ .. ,', f' '. 81.;(':....,\'..:..,,' -"'~.,rT~.lr;:"'.-r I. if', .!" I I ',___.. ." ,"-;- -". .,~' ,'" ( , ,. . "'''''' jo... , ! , : I" " , I" ,,' , ' '. . I I ". '. ~ '~, """i l~! - p- U ! I!J_ ~~ ~! ~~ ~ .~ ~ - ~ C . :.i. ~~ " ,lit ~ ~;~, BElIr ~ ,I]RBE[ J(~ r: ~ ~~~!~~ ~ Ii ~ II. ~~". 1 ; , 1 ~ J ~ 1)", (r- . ~ .11 r 10 Co,oy fO~ :;,~- a:=F "REV 1'2;J 01'--J S C>~ MC-~AU:::>'S Kimley-Horn and AssociatesJ Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive, West Palm Beach, FL:JM~~lctJ Raleigh, Charlotte, Nashville, Virginia Beach, Washington, Dallas, Phoenix, West Palm Beach. Tampa. Orlando, Fl Lauderdale, Vero Beech. Fl Myers May 16, 1988 Revised June 30, 1988 ~677 .01(07)P87-55 -.--' Ms. Tambri Heyden City of Boynton Beach 120 NE Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33~35 Re: Catalina Center/Study Revised to Include Gerulaitis Resort Dear Ms. Heyden: As requested, we have revised the parking analysis for Catalina Center located in Boynton Beach, Florida. This revision is a comprehensive document which includes a reduction of the amount of office square footage and the addition of a Gerulaitis Resort (health club/tennis center) along with all previous changes to the site, with the exception of the exclusion of the McDonald's outparcel. The McDonald's outparcel was not included at the City's request. As a result of the difference in parking peak characteristics of the exchanged land uses (office to health club), the demand at the Catalina Center peaks at 1:00 PM and 8:00 PM. These peaking characteristics are reflected in the tables and buffer calculations. ....."7 ~r The analysis was based on the City of Boynton Beach parking code; parking t.L1 generation rates recommended by the Urban Land Institute (ULI), ULI--the Urban Land Institute Shared Parking, 1983; parking generation rates recommended by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Parking Generation--An Interim Report, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1985; and the shared parking recommendations of the Urban Land Institute, ULIu The Urban Land Institute Shared Parking, 1983. All rates used in this analysis represent peak season demand. Differences in seasonal peaks which exist among the land uses\eroposed were conservatively ignored. wfnfel"" a. Shared parking is an integral part of the Catalina Center analysis. Shared parking is defined as parking space which can be used by two or more land uses without conflict or encroachment. In order for shared parking to be utilized, the peak accumulation of parked vehicles generated by different but adjacent land uses must not be concurrent. Building client relationships since 1967 .. .-----3 ~ I 'V7f!r;r:-.:!c;;r'{7, (1J'r;- rc.,." L:\::,W2/LU&Jijo !IL/0.;U U'u I J r--~-----'--- Ms. Tambri Heyden -2- May 16, 1988 Revised June 30, 1988 Catalina Center will consist of four land uses: office, retail, health club with ancillary facilities, and hotel with restaurant, lounge, and conference facilities contained wi thin the hotel. Considering the land use mix, maximum parking accumulation will occur on weekdays. An analysis has been made of the northern parcel, which contains 146,325 square feet of retail space, and the southern parcel, which contains 33,338 square feet of office, 24,608 square feet of health facilities, and a 166-room hotel with its auxiliary uses including 18 suites. The north and south parcels were analyzed separately and combined. The analysis was based on information provided by Ocean Properties, on the January 21, 1985, site plan of the total development, the August 27, 1986, site plan of the retail parcel, information provided verbally in August, 1987, the outparcel site plan of December 28, 1987, and supplemental information provided in 1988. Our analysis demonstrates that the proposed parking will be sufficient to accommodate the parking demands of both the northern and southern parcels, whether they are considered individually or together. Northern Parcel ULI and ITE are the most widely recognized sources of parking generation data. For a retail development of the size of Catalina Center, ULI recommends a rate of four spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area. This would indicate that 586 spaces should be provided for the northern parcel. ITE recommends a weekday parking rate for peak season (Thanksgiving to Christmas) of 3.25 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross leasable area, which would require Catalina Center to provide 476 spaces for the retail parcel. As per the a~~~}>.ed retail site plan, a total of "'R is' ~spaces are proposed for the retail parcel,. n 8.1 %) more than required by I ULI rates and~ (45.4%) more than indicated by the ITE peak season rates. ~.6 .fl1.::1- . j.u~ lost- The Boynton Beach parking code, for retail use, is generalized to accommodate aU 1.:rr-- ~ shopping center sizes. The code requires five parking spaces per 1,000 square feet ..}v~' e ,..tof gross leasable area. According to ULI, this is a rate appropriately applied to 6i'Y'~--fSli~ ~ retail developments greater than 600,000 square feet, over four times the size of ~.t~ ,'lJ-r Ir'\ the proposed Catalina Center retail parcel. Under the Boynton Beach parking ~Oc~t 6 code, the Catalina Center retail parcel would be required to provide 732 parking J./I tJ.- ~ ~ J.. spaces. 7Y~~ ~ '~IVI !~ ~I 'l:t~ (~::t. I/IfP( It> ~ It~. Of); " ,..l (/(lVf1lY fA. ) 4677.0H07)P87-55 ," --' ') 'I I ;----y-:>'f?~,''l n ,''...J'--'-;:--, I , I' 'L'I ' ", ,/ '~', 170" " /I 0 'fliJ]'71IL r i L- "-' '-JL -,U --J i....! L\...':::'J I I Ms. Tambri Heyden -3- May 16, 1988 Revised June 30, 1988 Southern Parcel A~ The nature and location of the health club suggests that many of the patrons of the.>l59'o +;'1, club will be office employees, hotel guests, residents of the adjacent Catalina Club ttllowdtd Q. and users of more than one"use in the club. These factors permit a reduction in the ClIY1.si~.f- 1 parking provided. The..Jor1"'sp\ces internal to the health club at the peak demand w,"+/" ~"i6 (,Jho....--t i b Z. represen~of the vehicles using a parking space on site. These vehicles have a j... lb~~71 ~ t>~ rv~t'\j primar~ trip purpose at one of the other use~. ~n site (ho~el,. office,. retai1).~~~ , Accordmg to personnel at local health club facll1tJ.~~/. the majority of tripS to a ~~I r1d1-no.e-- health club are secondary trips; therefore, ~~teDwas used.. The swimming ----'::: ~~....., d . ....,......,~'" fOOl pool an outdoor courts are enpected 1'0 generate demands @ntlrely front the uLI.el -~ooot~t{/. l::lSCS on site. ThcreforJ... atfi(p.percent J~.tc~~al captur~ was aoo.}i@d to these...us~_ t, i . ~ I-tH3 ~~ -j~c.: I ~~ ~tJ-'/(Mj K.~ t.1rw p4.-r~I"~""~l Table 1 (attached) outlmes the parkmg ef!land WhICh can be expected for the ! southern parcel using ITE and/or ULI generation, rates. As shown in Table 1, @~tJr/ i. without considering shared parking,~parking spaces, €ire required under ITE/ULI ~611'#~ recommendations. 5~ &57'., re-tfi, C71~ hi"I tii~,. \' \.EV (\0 :SW Compared to ITE and ULI, the Boynton Beach parking code is more conservative ~-f1~ for office, hotel, and restaurant/lounge land use, but requires fewer spaces for hLL-/-M. c.L.. conference facilities. Parking demand for the southern parcel generated using the 8';;~ Boynton Beach parking code is shown in Table 2 (attached). As shown, without ~ considering shared parking, the Boynton Beach code would require j>?"spaces to be Pn ~ provided for the southern parcel. (p11 ~+;:~~ -fe~' As previously stated, the physical layout and mixed-use character of the southern ~~ ~ parcel lends itself to shared parking. Table 3 (attached) shows the peak parking tl o-filic.v. demand projected for Catalina Center's southern parcel using the generation rates I recommended by ITE/P,U, and considering the shared parking recommendations of I ULI. As seen,.Jr.8'6'" ?p~f:es are required to meet the peak parking demand, well I below the 586 proposed for the site. Table 4 (attached) shows the peak parking I demand for the southern parcel using Boynton Beach rates for parking generation, I and ULI recommendations Jor shared parking. As seen, under these criteria, peak I parking demand will b~ spaces. The 586 spaces proposed represents a projected I surplus ofM'spaces. 50'/ ;17 I I I Given the hotel/office/health club/restaurant land use mix proposed for the southern parcel, it 1s reasonable to assume that shared parking will occur within the parcel itself. Analysis of the site plan shows that numerous parking spaces within the parcel are convenient to the four land uses which will allow shared parking to occur. --.-J 4677.01 (07)P87 -55 . ,r-~~----~- " ~ j/7c; r'" fWl i, l U:cDUfJDU@f!lc:!ru@[J'0J r~ Ms. Tambri Heyden -4- May 16,1988 Revised June 30, 1988 Based on the above analysis, parking proposed for the southern parcel of Catalina Center should prove sufficient to handling its parking needs. Total Development Given the mixed-use character and physical layout of the Catalina Center site, the most reasonable approach for analysis of the total development is through use of ULI shared parking recommendations. A total of .~parkin&.~~, f7 propose for the development. la'74-- :::: y~ ce.- hud4 f ,3~ v~ I $'1 /..{lU'i C OJ ~rs Projected parking demand for the total site using ULI's shared parking recommendations are shown in Tables 5, 6, and 7 (attached). Tables 5 and 6 use the ITE/ULI parking generation rates applied in Table 2 for land uses other than retail. bK"~ /Dr Table 5 uses the peak season rates for retail generation, and Table 6 uses ULI rates t?4a./! PYAI for retail generation. Based on discussions with Boynton Beach City staff, as the ~ various hotel components are being evaluated separately, the ULI rate of 1.0 space tt(c- Dlh-).Jd~ per hotel room and the ULI residential rate of 1.6 for the hotel suites is the 1/vs-it- f-+ appropriate parking generation rate to be used in the analysis. Table 7 reflects this ~ ~J~ 4:.'/ rate for the hotel room and suite generation and Boynton Beach code rates for all.~ ~ other uses. Iu-~ tU~ As shown, considering shared park}J;,~, the nvmger of parking spaces recommended for Catalina Center ranges from ~ to ~depending on the generation rate selected. It should be noted that in all the above scenarios, except where the Boynton codes are applied to each land use, sufficient parking space is provided on site even without considering shared parking. For the remainder of this analysis, the more conservative Boynton Beach rates reflected in Table 7 will be applied. The City of Boynton Beach requires that a 10% buffer be provided to ensure that a sufficient number of parking spaces are available at the time of peak use. Based on consultation with City of Boynton Beach staff, and analysis of the layout of the total site plan, it will be conservatively assumed that the retail and the office uses share only from the available hotel parking of 432 spaces. The restaurant outparcel may share from the hotel or retail. Also, due to the layout of the site which is not especially conducive to shared parking between the retail or restaurant and office uses, buffer calculations have been performed separately for retail, restaurant outparcel and office uses. By Boynton Beach code, the buffer is calculated as follows: Buffer = Surplus Shared Parking On-Site + Shared Parking Provided 4677.01(07)P87-55 i i I I , I I i I I I I i ~ . i~I--- --Ii : i rr!'ir-c--ct7,-o-,nn !Lr7@[J7fjIJ .1 !"\ '-. f ,I 7!l1UI '(~, ,I, 001 ~ I 0 i (i I'! '-' \_"'.__'-'_1...; ~--'U u w./ U , ,'-______ I Ms. Tambri Heyden -5- May 16, 1988 Revised June 30, 1988 * The peak hours of parking demand for the site are 1:00 PM and 8:00 PM as shown on Table 7. At 8:00, the hotel usage will require 359 spaces of the 432 provided leaving 73 spaces available for sharing with the other uses. Neither the retail or the office/health club w\!J require any shared parking a1- this time. The office/health club will use~of its 95 spaces, leaving .JI.6"itrailable sp~~es. The Marie Callenders restaurant outparcel will J1Jted to share JK' ~aces ~j9 accommodate its parking code requirement of~lS' A surplus of spaces of 1) - ~~~ 46 ,sr1 spaces therefore exists for the hotel site, leaving a surplus of ;;4 'f 4t =)J'5 b1 spaces for the office/health club. The buffer for the office/health club (to three significant figures) is therefore: -0/5' f/1 ~1, +- 95 +~x 100 =.6.Z-+% go a;f 8:00 p""" As calculated above, during the peak hours of parking demand, 73 spaces of the 432 ' provided for the hotel are available for shared parking. Also as shown, ..24'~f.aces will be shared at this time by the Marie Callenders outparcel leaving 73 - ~"::f ~ 1- S- spaces available to be shared with the retail. The peak demand of 637 spaces for the retail hts been met by the ~SDaces provided. This leaves a surplus of~- 637 =$ ~aces on the retail -si~ Overall, the surplus for the retail portio'iffs ~ + 49 = 104. The buffer for the retail (to three significant figures) is therefore: 51 -t'45~ q~ '" I 1~9 (p I~.I -'9f+~ x 100 =~ J;f.t + 14- a+- f':'co p.,.."... During the peak hour of parking demand of the site, the demand for spaces at the, Marie Callenders restaurant outparcel will be 100% of i ts tota~ }e.,cwirements (fS. 1"1 spaces). Since 59 spaces have been provided for the restaurant, ~ ~aces will need to be shared with the hotel. The buffer for the restaurant outparcel is: 9r-u-pkL&. -6vm~ ~ 45' SJ. 7 fJ- hc+e-I ~ ~ 59 + J.4;'y= ~ ~ At 1:00 PM the buffers are also met. The hotel will require 215 of the 432 spaces provided leaving ~F to share with the other uses on si';~. The office/health club will require ~~~ces, therefore needing to share 21 ?{5aces from the hotel. The retail center will demand 732 spaces, therefore needing to share ~aces from the hotel. Marie Callenders will not require any ffh ri!19 at 1;00 PM. Considering these demands, the surplus shared parking is 217 - - J:5l... = 1)'2 spaces. The buffer for the office/health club is: r Jf+ 135 IX 135 11.14- ~ x 100~ go I I I I I ! ) 4677 .OH07)P87-55 , *~~ . ,,-~~_..._._~,,~' i CCC[7;DD15f)7o[){j@fl[f/J I i,i - I ,----- -~, I Ms. Tambri Heyden -6- May 16, 1988 Revised June 30, 1988 ::J.. The buffer for the retail is: '7t ~ 13>' /8.+ -fH1 + 40 x 100 = ~ ~YT# The buffer for Marie Callenders is: (-t) , 11 oU' of(;ceff..u..{,fI.. ~ AI? - ~i - 44!#.~' 13s ...L I?~ /5S,I n 2 _ x 100 = I O~O.L 59 + ~ +'CFJ. J. 7Q d..Y Although the site demand is similar at 1:00 PM and grea ter at I :00 since the surplus comes from the hotel. surplus is available for the health club and retail. ,/01- 35- +4-;. 1~5 8:00 PM, the buffers are In other words, the entire It is seen that using the Boynton Beach generation rates, both the office and retail parcels meet the Boynton Beach buffer requirement of 10%. J~7+- Based on the above analysis, the J!,..m spaces provided for the total development should prove sufficient in handling the parking demands of the development. If you have any questions regarding this analysis, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, for Steven G. Godfrey, P.E. Vice President JFB:SGG:SOR/mec Attachments 4677 .01(07)P87-55 . Q Z < :s UJ Cl ~ Z - ~ " < Cl.. Q Z - < UJ UJ ,.J V'l c:Q :::l < Q .... Z .. < V'l ..J UJ .... ,.J < UJ " U _ " ,.J < :::l Cl.. -.... Z ~ ell: - UJ :c .... :::l o V'l "0 ~ (1) II) '"' (1) .... u &ctI (1)1/) 0::: c:: o .... +-' "* g "0 (1) a: o ~ \J\ ~ '* \\\~~~ N 0 N lI"I ~ \{) ~ :) <> ~~ll~~~~ ~J1 ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * - * ..J c:: ::> 0 +-' ~ c:: LlJ >. .... 0 _ c:J * * * * c:: c:: o 0 +-' +-' c:: c:: >. >. :i 00...... co c:J -' ~ i 1;;;, i I IS i I ~ I ~ @) 1<::::5 ~ I o~ t5 ~ ~~ ~\ *' *' o 0 ~ ~ * * * :i LlJ LlJ LlJ :i ::> !:: !:: !:: ::> . . +-' ..... . '*"': . ~+-' o-E 0- ~ III III 0- '"' III 0 . +-' +-' +-' +-' o 0 U .... ctI ctI ctI +-' o 0 lI"I U c:: (1) (1) (1) ctI !::.!::..:::::~~~~~~ o 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ _ .. oNNNII"\ --4 ..... ..... ........-t . III III III III +-' +-' +-' +-' ctI ctI ctI ctI (1) (1) (1) (1) II) II) II) II) ~ ~~~~\:q~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~j~N ~1~ ~ ~ ~ +-' +-' c:: c:: ~ ~ 00 ~ II) ~ ~ (1) c:: (1) +-' ._ _ _ ctI ctI 00.... U _ _ c:: (1) (1) +-' +-' c:: +-' ~ ctI 0 c:: +-' +-' II) II) ~ (1) ~ (1) 0 (1) 0 0 (1) (1) 0 (1) o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a: 0::: ~ ~ +-' .... III c:: (1) +-' c:: - . . . . +-' +-' +-' +-' ........~~ . . . . III +-' 0- 0- 0- Il) II) II) II) E o .... 0" 0 c:: III '"' ~ 00 0 o 0 ~ " (1) III ::> "0 c:: ctI ~ .a ~ - U +-' II) 5 E ~ o 0 .-:: u 0 ~ a: I/) - - (1) U '"' ctI 0. +-' ~ o - E o o a: . II) +-' c:: ctI L.. ~ ctI +-' II) (1) L.. '"' o ~ (1) +-' ctI '"' LlJ .... - (1) ~ +-' ~ +-' .~ "0 (1) II) ~ III +-' c:: ctI L.. ~ ctI +-' III (1) L.. - (1) +-' o ~ '"' o ~ II) c:: o .... +-' 0. E ~ III II) ctI :i ::> * ~ ~\ \ b \ \ @ \ Q s-:"\ :'..'::l ~ 0 \ ~~ <r ~ ~ i';t\ ~ ~~ ~\ ~ \ \,S C::S 0 0 '^ -.D 0 ~ 0) 0) 00 l""\ Cl' 08 .';: u - ?,-(l;) Q, \ ~ O)rjl ,~~ ct. 0;0 ~ ~ \(\L ~~ ~ \i~ c?- c?- '# -,R c?- o 0 0 0 0 0 l? ~ -\ I;) ~ t' O~ Z "=' ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ ~\ ; -.D 0 -.D~o7 ('I l""\ '" l""\ ~ c.. - $ o (l;) - ~ ~ ::!;;o ~ rjl -4- ~ ~ I;) ~ cC 1 \. ~ ~ 0) \1.< ~-~, ~ ~ t,j ~ (l;) -::3-- 'D ct. ~ < ..... ~ "II' c.. .. -0 g- ..... .c:;- ~ ~ ~ 0- C ~ ..... l/'l S l/'l l/'l ~~l/'l ~ ~ S 0 g- ~ ~ 0 ..... 0 0 (l;) (l;)'.>~ 0) 0.. g- O) ~ O)~(l;) ("ol ct. 0 0 0 l/'l l/'l 0) ~ -" 0 '^ ~ ~ ~ - 0 l""\ -" - .... '^ '^ ,^'_ l/'l ~ c: l""\ 0 - - '^ S ~ ~ ~.~o7 ':) .... l""\ l""\ 0 0 ('I - _3- ~ ;:t. . . . - - - 8 . - ('I - -" - ~ ~ l""\ - - - - (l;) ~ 0.. cC I;) ...a ~ it ~ . . . . l/'l ~ ~ l/'l l/'l ~ ~ < ~ "'" ~ "'" s ~ ~ ~ ..... ..... ..... ..... 0 .... (l;) (l;) (l;) (l;) c.. "'" . . . . S ~ ~~~\ < .... ~ 0- 0- 0- 0 0. ~ l/'l l/'l l/'l l/'l ~ c: 00 '^ ~ ~ 00 00 0 0 00 ('I 0 0 0 = - .s l""\ = - ('I ~ l""\ -.D r- ~ o. .. .. .. l""\ = ('I = '-t\ '>t\ a l""\ ('I - '5 ~ ~ 'i -;::a b ~ ~ 'ia ~ a- s ~ ? ~ l/'l l/'l .9- % -0 ~ S .g 5 ~ "'" "'" ct. ~ - 0 .... ~ ~ () () 0 ~ l)t) ,..J ct. rjl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c: f. l/'l .... ~ - - "'" .... % s ~ ~ 0) - - ~ ~ l/'l .... (l;) 0 0) ~ 0) ..... 0 0 ~ ..... ~ 0 :r. :r. ,..J ct. 0 0.- ~ ----------~- . TABLE III SOUTHERN PARCEL PARKING DE"AND USIN6 IrEfULI 6ENERATION SHARED PARKINS ANALYSIS - NEEKDAY JOB NU"BER: 4677.02 JOB NA"E: CATALINA CENTER DATE: JUNE 30, 1988 HOTEL ------------------------------------------ OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLU GUEST ROO" RESTfLOUNGE CONFERENCE ROO~ T.~ Sl1 PEAK DE"AHD: 83 0 SO 4 (,3 177 7b 148 Ii) HOUR OF THE DAY $/0 b:OO A.". 2 0 0 13~ 177 15 0 215 7:00 A.". 17 0 1?J.- 150 15 0 204 8:00 A.". 52 0 3 1 }..)- 115 15 74 280 9:00 A.". 77 0 5 1 3>- 97 15 148 3b3 10:00 A.I'!. B3 0 10 1 3~ 80 15 148 356 11:00 A.". 83 0 15 1 .3J- 62 23 148 351 12:00 NOON 75 (> 25 2 3.:l- 53 38 148 359 1:00 P.". 75 0 35 2 3.;t. 53 53 148 385 2:00 P.~. 81 0 30 2 3;)..- b2 4b 148 387 3:00 P.". 77 0 30 2 'J'- b2 42 148 379 4:00 P.". 64 0 25 +-r 90 39 148 383 5:00 P.I!. 39 0 35 1 t" 106 53 148 422 b:OO P.I'!. 19 0 45 1 1,1 124 68 148 445 7:00 P.". b 0 SO 4 t,3 133 7b 149 454 8:00 P.I'!. 6 0 50 4 .,~ 159 7b 148 490 9:00 P.I'!. '1 0 50 4 t..~ IbB 76 148 ~50l ... 10:00 P.". 2 (> 45 2 ft' 177 b8 74 396 11:00 P.". 0 0 35 21 ~~ 177 53 0 2Bb 12:00 "IDNISHT 0 0 25 21 ~,:).. 177 38 0 261 . TABLE IV SOUTHERN PARCEL PARKINS DEIIAND USING BOYNTON BEACH GENERATION SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS - WEEKDAY JOB IlUIIBER: 4677.02 JOB NAIIE: CATALINA CENTER DATE: JUNE 30, 19B8 HOTEL ------------------------------------------ OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CL GUEST RODII REST/LOUNGE CONFERENCE ROO" TOTAL PEAK DEIIAND: 112 0 83 4 (,~ 221 126 74 ~lb1t:t Ci) HOUR OF THE DAY /)s'~ 6:00 A.II. 3 0 0 3:,}- 221 25 0 270 7:00 A.II. 22 0 2 2 j:;., IBB 25 0 258 8:00 A.". 71 0 -4 2 3.).. 144 25 37 301 9:00 A.". 104 0 8 2 3~ 122 25 74 354 10:00 A.II. 112 0 17 3>- 99 25 74 348 11:00 A.II. 112 0 25 1 3'>- 77 38 74 347 12:00 NOON 101 0 42 1 3~ b6 63 74 366 1:00 P.II. 101 0 58 1 3.r- 66 88 74 408 2: 00 P.l'1. 109 0 50 13;}.. 77 76 74 406 3:00 P.II. 104 0 50 1 3.)- 77 69 74 395 4:00 P.II. 86 0 42 2 If1 99 63 74 393 5:00 P.II. 53 0 58 4 (,} 133 88 74 447 6:00 P.l'!. 26 0 75 4 (,3 155 113 74 484 7:00 P.". 8 0 83 4 '-3 166 126 74 498 B:OO P.II. 8 0 83 4 1.,,3 199 126 74 531 9:00 P.II. 3 0 83 4 (,3 210 126 74 ~55'1 10:00 P.II. 3 0 75 2 'IY 221 113 37 478 11:00 P.II. 0 0 58 2 ~~ 221 B8 0 388 12: 00 IHDNISHT 0 0 42 2 7..L- 221 63 0 346 ... TABLE V SHARED PARKINS ANALYSIS ITE RATES FOR RETAIL USE, ULI/ITE RATES FOR OTHER lAND USES SHARED PARKINS ANALYSIS - WEEKDAY JOB NU"BER: 4b77.02 JOB NA"E: CATALINA CENTER DATE: JUNE 30, 1988 H01'El ------------------------------------------ OFF I CE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB GUEST ROOIt REST/LOUNGE CONFERENCE ROOM TOTAL PEAK DE"AND: 83 47b 50 1 (,3 177 7b 148 ~/013 ~ I HOUR OF THE DAY ~/Q b:OO A.l'1. 2 0 0 2 3~ 177 15 (I 215 7:00 A.It. 17 38 1 3.l- 150 15 (I 242 8:00 A.I1. 52 8b 3 1 3~ 115 15 74 365 9:00 A.I1. 77 200 5 3:.1- 97 15 148 5b3 10:00 A.I1. 83 324 10 ?J-. 80 15 148 680 11:00 A.II. 83 414 15 3+. b2 23 148 765 12:00 NOON 75 462 25 3;L 53 38 148 821 1 : 00 P .It 75 47b 35 1 3~ 53 53 148 861 2:00 P.I'!. 81 462 30 13~ 62 46 148 848 3:00 P.I1. 77 452 30 ?>~ 62 42 148 832 4:00 P.II. 64 414 25 2 * 80 38 148 797 5:00 P.II. 39 376 35 4 "'3 lOb 53 148 798 b:OO P.It. 19 390 45 4 (,3 124 bS 148 836 7:00 P.lt 6 424 50 4 "'3 133 7b 148 877 8:00 P.". 6 414 50 -: 159 76 148 8Bb 1D1 9:00 P.I1. 2 290 50 24<;( 168 7b 148 764 10:00 P.It. 2 152 45 21 ~.;L 177 68 74 540 11:00 P .1'1. 0 62 35 21 3,).. 177 53 0 348 12:00 I1IDNISHT 0 0 25 21 3.)-- 177 38 0 261 .. TABLE VI SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS UlI RATES FOR RETAIL USE, UlI/ITE RATES FOR OTHER lAND USES SHARED PARKINS ANAlVSIS - WEEKDAY JOB NUI'!BER: 4b77.02 JOB NAI'lE: CATALINA CENTER DATE: JUNE 30 I 198B HOTEL ------------------------------------------ OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CL GUEST ROO" REST/LSUNSE CONFERENCE ROOI'! ~ PEAK DEPlAND: B3 5B6 50 /'3 177 7b 148 It&'3 tjp HOUR OF THE DAY A5'% 6:00 A.". 2 0 0 2 $;1.. 177 15 (I 215 7:00 A.It. 17 47 2 3..2 150 15 0 251 8:00 A.". 52 105 3 3~ 115 15 74 385 9:00 A.I'!. 77 246 5 3~ 97 15 148 609 10:00 A.PI. 83 398 10 13.;L 80 15 148 755 11:00 A.I'!. 83 510 15 13.>- 62 23 148 861 12:00 NOON 75 568 25 1 3~ 53 38 148 928 1:00 P,II. 75 SOb 35 1 3.).. 53 53 148 971 2:00 P.". Bl 568 30 21 3;)- b2 46 14B 955 3:00 P.I'!. 77 557 30 21 3,}- 62 42 148 936 4:00 P.I'!. 64 510 25 29 f6 BO 38 148 893 5:00 P.Il. 39 463 35 41 '-'3 lOb 53 148 885 6:00 P.I'!. 19 481 45 1 "3 124 be 148 nb 7:00 P.Il. b 522 50 1 (,3 133 76 148 975 8:00 P.I'l. 6 510 50 (,3 159 76 148 ~;cl .~ 9:00 P.lt 2 357 50 .. (,3 168 76 148 843 H>:OO P.I" 2 188 45 2 1<iI 177 68 74 583 11 : 00 P.I'!, 0 7b 35 3.;1.. 177 53 (I 362 12:00 Il!DNIGHT 0 0 25 1 3~ 177 39 0 2bl ! ! ..' .. ... TABLE VII SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS USING BOYNTON BEACH GENERATION RATES ULI RATE USED FOR GUEST ROOIIS SHARED PARKINS ANALYSIS - NEEKDAY JOB NUIIBER: 4677.02 JOB NAIIE: CATALINA CENTER DATE: JUNE 30, 19B8 HOTEL ------------------------------------------ OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB GUEST ROOPl REST ILDUN6E CONFERENCE ROOPl ~ 1 PEAK DEIIAND: 112 732 83 1 ~3 177 126 74 13~ ti) HOUR OF THE DAV OlS't" 0:01) A.Pl. 3 0 0 2 ~)- 177 25 0 226 7:00 A.Pl. 22 59 2 150 25 0 279 8:00 A.II. 71 132 4 115 25 37 404 9:00 A.II. 104 307 8 97 25 74 637 10:00 A.II. 112 498 17 1 3.')..- BO 25 74 821i 11:00 A.II. 112 637 25 13:2- 62 38 74 968 12:00 NOON 101 710 42 1?1;1.. 53 03 74 1063 1:00 P.". 101 732 58 3;:L 53 88 74 1127 2:00 P.". 109 710 50 2 ,.1- 62 7b 74 1101 3:00 P .It 104 695 50 2 V- 62 69 74 1075 4:00 P.lt 86 637 42 29 +1 BO 63 74 1010 5:00 P.I'\. 53 578 58 41 {/3 106 88 74 998 6:00 P.II. 26 600 75 41 {,:~ 124 113 74 1053 7:00 P.I'!. 8 651 83 411/3 133 126 74 1116 8:00 P. II. B 637 83 4 ,,~ 159 126 74 c0D t15c 9:00 P.II. 3 447 83 4 (,1 168 126 74 942 10:00 P.II. 3 234 75 2 4-fi 177 113 37 bbS 11:00 P.II. 0 95 58 ~.). 177 88 (I 439 12:00 "IDNISHT 0 0 42 ,1 ,}.- 177 63 0 302 1 . ~~:-l iA (c-e, {h'~ r-...C--::.c,y-r r:::/ Ie.. (i---------- - I ['V'/o ~ ,'" .. / ----:r--~., ",-.-, .-1 '-.1 ,,,---- ,....,.---,....- I ^ ". ! I,L,-) ,-/ II /l O.-JI, ~ '-', -l..'GJ~ 'I" -/ -, L"" I'L' ,c--" 'Ll ", L ' '--' L1 '~ " -, ,--' r'..I '--- -- L' LJ.J i i ------------=:0 I Kim/ey-Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive. West Palm Beach. FL 33407 · (407) 845-0665 -~ Raleigh, Charlotte. Nashville. Virginia Beach, Washington, Dallas, Phoenix, Stuart. West Palm Beach. Tampa, Orlando, Ft. Lauderdale. Vero Beach, Ft. Myers May 16, 1988 ReVised~~ 27.1988 - A~ ~e:&b~r 4677.0l( "87-55 ~~, Ms. Tambri Heyden Ci ty of Boynton Beach 120 NE Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 Re: 1Je~ ~o,.. I }JCLLLY'E M.CfC;C,t<J AL.O~ - Co u,.,L.t:7 '0e:- U?7~ ~~ 'A~o~'T t?t~ -- ~ As requested, we have revised the parking analysis for Catalina Centre Iff located in Boynton Beach, Florida. This revision is a comprehensive document ~-q,f.JN which includes a reduction of the amount of office square footage and the addition l~ ~ of a Gerulaitis Resort (health club/tennis center) along with all previous changes to I the site. As a result of the difference in parking peak characteristics of the exchanged land uses (office to health club), the demand at the Catalina Centre peaks at I :00 PM and &:00 PM. These peaking characteristics are reflected in the tables and buffer calculations. Dear Ms. Heyden: Catalina Centre Parking Study Rev ised to Include Gerulai tis Resort The analysis was based on the City of Boynton Beach parking code; parking generation rates recommended by the Urban Land Institute (ULI), ULI--the Urban Land Institute Shared Parking, 1983; parking generation rates recommended by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Parking Generation--An Interim Report, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1985; and the shared parking recommendations of the Urban Land Institute, ULI-- The Urban Land Institute Shared Parking, 1983. All rates used in this analysis represen t peak season demand. Differences in seasonal peaks which exist among the land uses proposed were conservatively ignored. Shared parking is an integral part of the Catalina C~ntre analysis. Shared parking is defined as parking space which can be used by two or more land uses wi thout conflict or encroachment. In order for shared parking to be utilized, the peak accumulation of parked vehicles generated by different but adjacent land uses must not be concurrent. \.. Building client relationships since 1967 - -~---- . :~,~C~,~jf5~7o ~'{(fC~0'B Ms. Tambri Heyden -2- May 16, 1988 Revised July 27, 1988 Catalina Centre will consist of four land uses: office, retail, health club with ancillary facilities, and hotel with restaurant, lounge, and conference facilities contained within the hotel. Considering the land use mix, maximum parking accumulation will occur on weekdays. An analysis has been made of the northern parcel, which contains llj.6,325 square feet of retail space, and the southern parcel, which contains 33,338 square feet of office, 24,608 square feet of health facilities, and a l66-room hotel with its auxiliary uses including 18 suites. The north and south parcels were analyzed separately and combined. The analysis was based on information provided by Ocean Properties, on the January 21, 1985, site plan of the total development, the August 27, 1986, site plan of the retail parcel, information provided verbally in August, 1987, the outparcel site plan of December 28, 1987, and supplemental information provided in 1988. Our analysis demonstrates that the proposed parking will be sufficient to accommodate the parking demands of both the northern and southern parcels, whether they are considered individually or together. Northern Parcel ULI and ITE are the most widely recognized sources of parking generation data. For a retail development of the size of Catalina Centre, ULI recommends a rate of four spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area. This would indicate that 586 spaces should be provided for the northern parcel. ITE recommends a weekday parking rate for peak season (Thanksgiving to Christmas) of 3.25 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross leasable area, which would require Catalina Centre to provide 476 spaces for the retail parcel. As per the approved retail site plan, a total of 688 spaces are proposed for the retail parcel, 102 (17.4%) more than required by ULI rates and 212 (44.5%) more than indicated by the ITE peak season rates. The Boynton Beach parking code, for retail use, is generalized to accommodate all shopping center sizes. The code requires five parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area. According to ULI, this is a rate appropriately applied to retail developments greater than 600,000 square feet, over four times the size of the proposed Catalina Centre retail parcel. Under the Boynton Beach parking code, the Catalina Centre retail parcel would be required to provide 732 parking spaces. 4677.01 (07)P87 -55 . , , : '--- :'......,'~~~~~'~'!70w~(f"L--JJD ! :]' L .~ ~ Ms. Tambri Heyden -3- May 16, 1988 Revised July 27, 1988 Southern Parcel Given the hotel/office/health club/restaurant land use mix proposed for the southern parcel, it is reasonable to assume that shared parking will occur within the parcel itself. Analysis of the site plan shows that numerous parking spaces within the parcel are convenient to the four land uses which will allow shared parking to occur. The nature and location of the health club suggests that many of the patrons of the club will be office employees, hotel guests, residents of the adjacent Catalina Club and users of more than one use in the club. These factors permit a reduction in the parking provided. The 20 spaces internal to the health club at the peak demand represent under 2% of the vehicles using a parking space on site. These vehicles have a primary trip purpose at one of the other uses on site (hotel, office, retail). A 25% reduction was applied to the health club facility, as per previous correspondence with the City, to account for the secondary characteristics of trips to this type of facili ty. The swim ming pool and outdoor courts are ancillary uses which require no additional parking. Table I (attached) outlines the parking demand which can be expected for the southern parcel using ITE and/or ULI generation rates. As shown in Table I, without considering shared parking, 597 parking spaces are required under ITE/ULI recommenda tions. Compared to ITE and ULI, the Boynton Beach parking code is more conservative for office, hotel, and restaurant/lounge land use, but requires fewer spaces for conference facilities. Parking demand for the southern parcel generated using the Boynton Beach parking code is shown in Table 2 (attached). As shown, without considering shared parking, the Boynton Beach code would require 683 spaces to be provided for the southern parcel. As previously stated, the physical layout and mixed-use character of the southern parcel lends itself to shared parking. Table 3 (attached) shows the peak parking demand projected for Catalina Centre's southern parcel using the generation rates recommended by ITE/ULI, and considering the shared parking recommendations of ULI. As seen, 508 spaces are required to meet the peak parking demand, well below the 582 proposed for the site. Table 4 (attached) shows the peak parking demand for the southern parcel using Boynton Beach rates for parking generation, and ULI recommendations for shared parking. As seen, under these criteria, peak parking demand will be 563 spaces. The 582 spaces proposed represents a projected surplus of 19 spaces. 4677 .OH07)P87-55 I: I .1~1~/~\V70 ~ rO'l?'r;l i i __.L---U::72- LI.-......:.../Uu'...J 1 ,L ===::b Ms. Tambri Heyden -4- May 16, 1988 Revised July 27, 1988 Based on the above analysis, parking proposed for the southern parcel of Catalina Centre should prove sufficient to handling its parking needs. Total Development Given the mixed-use character and physical layout of the Catalina Centre site, the most reasonable approach for analysis of the total development is through use of ULI shared parking recommendations. A total of 1,270 parking spaces are proposed for the development. Projected parking demand for the total site using ULI's shared parking recommendations are shown in Tables 5, 6, and 7 (attached). Tables 5 and 6 use the ITE/ULI parking generation rates applied in Table 2 for land uses other than retail. Table 5 uses the peak season rates for retail generation, and Table 6 uses ULI rates for retail generation. Based on discussions with Boynton Beach City staff, as the various hotel components are being evaluated separately, the ULI rate of 1.0 space per hotel room and the ULI residential rate of 1.6 for the hotel suites is the appropriate parking generation rate to be used in the analysis. Table 7 reflects this rate for the hotel room and suite generation and Boynton Beach code rates for all other uses. As shown, considering shared parking, the number of parking spaces recommended for Catalina Centre ranges from 904 to 1,154 depending on the generation rate selected. It should be noted that in all the above scenarios, except where the Boynton codes are applied to each land use, sufficient parking space is provided on site even without considering shared parking. For the remainder of this analysis, the more conservative Boynton Beach rates reflected in Table 7 will be applied. The City of Boynton Beach requires that a 10% buffer be provided to ensure that a sufficient number of parking spaces are available at the time of peak use. Based on consultation with City of Boynton Beach staff, and analysis of the layout of the total site plan, it will be conservatively assumed that the retail and the office uses share only from the available hotel parking of 430 spaces. The restaurant outparcel may share from the hotel or retail. Also, due to the layout of the site which is not especially conducive to shared parking between the retail or restaurant and office uses, buffer calculations have been performed separately for retail, restaurant outparcel and office uses. By Boynton Beach code, the buffer is calculated as follows: Buffer = Surplus Shared Parking On-Site + Shared Parking Provided 4677.0 I (07)P87 -55 ,-:-;'r-':--;-"}if;!iV7o ,-:!!0';'~,'T' I, L-"';'LL'-~G~(... '--'L---'::'lU~d Ms. Tambri Heyden -5- May 16, 1988 Revised July 27, 1988 The peak hours of parking demand for the site are 1:00 PM and 8:00 PM as shown on Table 7. At 8:00, the hotel usage will require 359 spaces of the 430 provided leaving 71 spaces available for sharing with the other uses. Neither the retail or the office/health club will require any shared parking at this time. The office/health club will use 71 of its 93 spaces, leaving 22 available spaces. The Marie Callenders restaurant outparcel will need to share 28 spaces to accommoda te its parking code requirement of 87. A surplus of spaces of 71 - 28 = 43 spaces therefore exists for the hotel site, leaving a surplus of 43 + 22 = 65 spaces for the office/health club. The buffer for the office/health club (to three significant figures) is therefore: 9;5+ 80 x 100 = 37.1% As calculated above, during the peak hour of parking demand 8:00 p.m., 71 spaces of the 430 provided for the hotel are available for shared parking. Also as shown, 28 spaces will be shared at this time by the Marie Callenders outparcel leaving 71 - 28 = 43 spaces available to be shared with the retail. The peak demand of 637 spaces for the retail has been met by the 688 spaces provided. This leaves a surplus of 688 - 637 = 51 spaces on the retail site. Overall, the surplus for the retail portion is 51 + 43 = 94. The buffer for the retail (to three significant figures) is therefore: 94 688 + 40x 100 = 12.8% The buffers cri tical to meeting the City of Boynton Beach's code are provided in the following calculations. During the peak hour of parking demand of the site, the demand for spaces at the Marie Callenders restaurant outparcel will be 100% of its total requirements (83 spaces). Since 59 spaces have been provided for the restaurant, 28 spaces will need to be shared with the hotel. The buffer for the restaurant outparcel is: 43 59 + 28 = 49.4% At 1 :00 PM the buffers are also met. The hotel will require 215 of the 430 spaces provided leaving 215 to share with the other uses on site. The office/health club will require 133 spaces, therefore needing to share 40 spaces from the hotel. The retail center will demand 732 spaces, therefore needing to share 44 spaces from the hotel. Marie Callenders will not require any sharing at 1:00 PM. Considering these demands, the surplus shared parking is 215 - 40 - 44 = 131 spaces. The buffer for the office/health club is: 131 95 + 80 x 100 = 74.9% 4677.01 (07)P87 -55 I~-=---- r? ,LJ' ~_n -I II '. "~,, V;;;;IV7,., ~ /0",1-;',"0 L'\....lLL.-'L'l...-dl.::5s./'-'L uc-L Ji..) Ij Ms. Tambri Heyden -6- May 16, 1988 Revised July 27, 1988 The buffer for the retail is: 131 688+44 xl00=17.9% The buffer for Marie Callenders is: 131 59 + 28 x 100 = 150.6% Although the site demand is similar at 1:00 PM and 8:00 PM, the buffers are greater at 1:00 since the surplus comes from the hotel. In other words, the entire surplus is available for the health club and retail. It is seen that using the Boynton Beach generation rates, both the office and retail parcels meet the Boynton Beach buffer requirement of 10%. Based on the above analysis, the 1,270 spaces provided for the total development should prove sufficient in handling the parking demands of the development. If you have any questions regarding this analysis, please do not hesitate to con tact us. Very truly yours, JBP/KC/mec Attachments 4677 .OH07)P87-55 r lr=- i: ,~ I ,~ ; :.::-: ! l;:; i ,C' I' -= l II ::_~ ~~ !I' ~ V V) ~I II :;C~ ... V I'<'. I'<'. 00 0'\ N 0 .::l- " I! ~ .- U 00 \0 .::l- N N LI"\ LI"\ 0'\ i! \~ 5-ro ..... LI"\ VV') I II 08 . ~ ,I ' - I I Ii c::s : I.~ i '---- c I 0 '* '* '* '* '* '* ?J< '* .- I +" 0 LI"\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 I '*~ N -0 V 0:: ~~ I'<'. C'f'\ 00 0'\ N 0 .::l- 00 Cl o u 00 00 .::l- N N LI"\ LI"\ .::l- ..... ..... Z ",..ro .... II( V') ~ . uJ * V) Cl +" - * C (j V ....l c ro ~ Z u :J 0 ... Z ... +" ~ - ~ C * * * ro - ~ ~ 0 uJ >. - - uJ uJ uJ - +" c::.:: V') 0 ....l ....l ....l V) ~ II( f- ee ::> :J f- f- f- :J V II( - - - - ... 0. ... c.. 0 Cl Q '+< Z UJ . V c::.:: +" . +" II( II( v <+-: +" ro - <+-: . ... UJ :c +" 0" E UJ ro V) 0" uJ ...l II) II) ~ V) ... f- c:c ::J 0 0 . +" +" +" +" - ~ 0 0 U .- ro ro ro +" < Q Z ro 0 0 U C v v v ro v .c I- Z ... v .... I'<'. 0 ~ V) V) V) V +" a. - - - - - - - V) II( II) LI"\ 0 0 '-0 .::l- .::l- .::l- - .c ...l UJ . . N N N LI"\ +" l- N ..... ..... ..... .- ....l II( ~ UJ ~ "0 U - V ~ ...J . . V) V) +" +" E V) V) V) V) V) ~ II( ::> '+< '+< +" +" +-' +" +-' . . 0 .- ro ro ro ro V) c.. - +" +-' UJ 'ijj 0" C" 0 C v v v v c Z l- V) V) ... ~ V) V) V) V) ro c ~ - v 00 00 00 00 0 LI"\ LI"\ '-0 ... ~ UJ +" I'<'. 0 .::l- ..... 0'\ 0 N 0'\ ro C I'<'. '-0 ..... N N N :c - +-' V) l- I'<'. .::l- V ::> I'<'. N ... 0 ..... v II) +-' - 0 .... .c v ... u 0 ... '+< ro v 0. V) +-' C V) ~ 0 :J 0 E .- +-' -0 V) V) 0 0. ..0 E c ~ V +-' +-' 0 E ro 0 +-' ~ - .- C C ~ ....l U 0 ~ ro ro V) ~ V') ... ... ~ V) I v .c ~ ~ v c ro +-' - .... ro ro ~ .- I u - v V +" +-' C +-' - ;;:; ro +-' +-' V) V) ~ v ....l '+< V 0 0 v v 0 v ::> I 0 :I: :I: :I: 0:: ~ ....l ~ * I " ~ \\ \ ~ ~ ~\~ ~ l/l c-<"I ""' -.J) 0 -.J) r--. 1--' ~ ('l -.J) 00 c-<"I <1' c-<"I 00 r--. 00 ._ u .... -.J) ~~ .... .... ~rJl '" *\ '# '# '# '# '# '# '# '# 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ""' ('l \j z ~ ~ ~ ~~ c-<"I ""' -.J) 0 -.J) r--. .::t ('l 00 c-<"I <1' c-<"I 00 r--. .cC .... 00 0- o u .... .... ~ Q -~ '8 .... ~ rJl \j .cC ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ '" . .cC Z +" ...... 0- .. -0 0- Q ~ ~ l/l . ~ l/l l/l +" S 0 S +" ...... ~ ~ ...... +" 0- l/l ~ 0 0- 0 ~ ~ +" ('l ct. 0 o~ 0 ~ ~ l/l ~ l/l l/l ~ ~ .... 1--' +" 0 ~ '8 - 0 - .... ""' -.J:'\ 0 l/l C. c-<"I 0 -.J:'\ C. ~ ~ ? ('l '=' .... .::t .... c-<"I c-<"I - ~ ;(. - - - <6 . - . - .... .... Q ,.. c-<"I .... .... ('l ..... .... ~ z ~ ..(. \j p.. ,.J z ~ ~ . ~ ~ . . l/l l/l l/l +" l/l +" +" S ~ +" +" ...... +" ...... ...... ~ . ~ 0- +" . . 0 .... ~ 0' ~ .cC .- 0' 0' 0 S ~ ~ l/l l/l l/l 0- ~ l/l l/l l/l ,.. C. ~ ~ 00 00 00 ""' 0 c-<"I -.J) ~ 00 ('l <1' -.J) <1' c-<"I 0 .::t .... ('l ~ oS c-<"I -.J) .... ('l -.J) ~ ~ .. .. 00 c-<"I .::t ~ a c-<"I ('l ~ 'i ..n )" ~ ~ '8 'ia ~ ~ s ';) l/l "g, 0 -0 .0- S l/l 0 c. 2. ~ +" +" '" ~ 0 .... ~ ~ ,..l (.) 0 '=' 00 '" ,.. ,.. rJl ~ ~ ~ c. '8 oS .... .... .... +" ~ ~ S +" +" ~ .... l/l l/l .... ~ +" ~ ...... ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ...... '" et- a :x:. :x:. :x:. ,..l -~----~--~ ,- ,--------------~ ~ ABLE III SOUTHERN PARCEL PARKING DEMAND USING ITEfULI GENERATION SHARED PARKINS ANALYSIS - WEEKDAY JOB NU"BER: 4677.01 JOB NAME: CATALINA CENTRE DATE: JUL Y 27. 1988 HOTEL ------------------------------------------ OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB SUEST ROOM REST/LOUNGE CONFERENCE ROO" TOTAL PEAK DE"AND: 83 0 50 63 177 7b 148 597 HOUR OF THE DAY 6:00IUI. 2 0 0 32 177 15 0 226 7:00 A.M. 17 0 32 150 15 0 215 8:00 A.lt 52 0 3 32 115 15 74 291 9:00 A.I'\. 77 0 5 32 97 15 148 374 1(>:00 A.". 83 0 10 32 80 15 148 367 11:00 A.". 83 0 15 32 6" 23 148 362 L 12:00 NOON 75 0 25 32 53 38 148 370 1:00 P.M. 75 0 35 32 53 53 148 396 2:00 P.M. 81 0 30 3"1 62 46 148 398 _L 3:00 P.M. 77 0 30 32 62 42 148 390 4:00 P.M. 64 0 25 44 80 38 148 399 5:00 P.I'\. 39 0 35 63 106 53 148 444 6:00 P.". 19 0 45 63 124 6B 148 467 7:00 P.". 6 0 50 63 133 7b 148 476 8:00 P.M. 6 0 50 63 159 76 148 502 9:00 P.M. 2 0 50 63 16S 76 148 50B 10:00 P.I'\. 2 0 45 44 177 68 74 411 11:00 P.M. 0 0 ..~ 32 177 53 0 297 .hJ 12:00 MIDNISHT 0 0 25 32 177 38 0 272 TABLE IV SOUTHERN PARCEL PARKING DEIIAND USING BOYNTON BEACH GENERATION SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS - WEEKDAV JOB NU~BER: 4677.01 JOB NAI'IE: CATALINA CENTRE DATE: JULV 27, 1988 HOTEL ------------------------------------------ OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB GUEST ROOII RESTiLOUN6E CONFERENCE ROOII TOTAL PEAK OEIIAND: 112 0 87 63 221 126 74 &83 HOUR OF THE DAY 6:00 A.II. 3 0 0 32 221 25 0 281 7:00 A.II. 22 0 2 32 188 25 0 269 8:00 A.II. 71 0 4 32 144 25 37 312 9:00 A.II. 104 0 9 32 122 25 74 365 10:00 A.II. 112 0 17 32 99 25 74 360 11:00 A.II. 112 0 26 32 77 38 74 359 12:00 NOON 101 0 44 32 66 63 74 379 1:00 P.II. 101 0 61 32 b6 88 74 422 2:00 P.I1. 109 0 52 32 77 76 74 419 3: 00 Ul. 104 0 52 32 77 69 74 409 4:00 P.II. 86 0 44 44 99 63 74 410 5:00 P.II. 53 0 61 63 133 S8 74 471 6:00 P.I1. 26 0 78 63 155 113 74 509 7:00 P.II. 8 0 87 b3 16b 12b 74 524 8:00 P.II. 8 0 87 b3 199 12b 74 557 9:00 P.II. 3 0 87 63 210 12& 74 5b3 10:00 P.II. 3 0 78 44 221 113 37 497 11:00 P.II. 0 0 bl 32 221 88 0 402 12:00 I'IIDNI6HT 0 0 44 32 221 63 0 359 TABLE V SHARED PARKINS ANALVSIS ITE RATES FOR RETAIL USE, ULI/ITE RATES FOR OTHER LAND USES SHARED PARKINS ANALYSIS - WEEKDAV JOB NUIIBER: 4677.01 JOB NAIIE: CATALINA CENTRE DATE: JULV 27, 1988 HOTEL ------------------------------------------ OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB GUEST ROOII REST/LOUNGE CONFERENCE ROOII TOTAL PEAK DEMND: 83 476 50 63 177 76 148 1073 HOUR OF THE DAY 6:00 A.II. '1 0 0 32 177 15 0 226 " 7:00 A.II. 17 38 32 150 15 0 253 8:00 A.II. 52 86 7 32 115 15 74 376 .\ 9:00 A.II. 77 200 5 32 97 15 148 574 10:00 A.II. 83 324 10 32 80 15 148 691 11:00 A.'t 83 414 15 32 62 23 148 776 12:00 NOON 75 462 25 32 53 38 148 832 1:00 P.lt 75 476 35 32 53 53 148 872 2:00 P.II. 81 462 30 32 62 46 148 859 3:00 P.II. 77 452 30 32 62 42 148 843 4:00 P.II. 64 414 25 44 80 38 148 813 5:00 P.II. 39 376 35 63 106 53 148 820 6:00 P.II. 19 390 45 63 124 68 148 858 7:00 P.II. 6 424 50 63 133 76 148 899 8:00 P.II. 6 414 50 50 159 76 148 904 9:00 P.II. 2 290 50 44 168 76 148 779 10:00 P.II. 2 152 45 32 177 6B 74 551 11:00 P.II. 0 62 35 32 177 53 0 359 12:00 IIIDNI6HT 0 0 25 32 177 38 0 272 TABLE VI SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS ULI RATES FOR RETAIL USE, ULI/ITE RATES FOR OTHER LAND USES SHARED PARKINS ANALYSIS - WEEKDAY JOB NUI'IBER: 4677.01 JOB NAI'IE: CA T All NA CENTRE DATE: JULY 27, 1988 HOTEL ------------------------------------------ OFfICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB SUEST ROO" REST/LOUNGE CONFERENCE ROOI'I TOTAL PEAK DEI'IAND: 83 586 50 63 177 7b 148 1183 HOUR OF THE DAY 6:00 A.I'I. 2 0 0 32 177 15 0 226 7:00 A.". 17 47 32 150 15 0 262 8:00 A.I'I. 52 105 3 32 115 15 74 396 9:00 A.I'I. 77 246 5 32 97 15 148 620 10:00 A.II. 83 398 10 32 80 15 148 766 11:00 A.I'I. 83 510 15 32 62 23 148 872 12:00 NOON 75 568 25 32 53 38 148 939 1: 00 P .1'1. 75 586 35 32 53 53 148 982 2:00 P.I'I. 81 568 30 32 62 46 148 966 3:00 P.I'\. 77 557 30 32 62 42 148 947 4:00 P.I'I. 64 510 25 44 80 38 148 908 5:00 P.". 39 463 35 63 106 53 148 907 6:00 P.M. 19 481 45 63 124 68 148 948 7:00 P.I1. 6 522 50 63 133 76 148 997 8:00 P.I'I. 6 510 50 63 159 76 148 1012 9:00 P.". '1 357 50 63 168 76 148 865 .. 10:00 P.I'I. 2 188 45 44 177 68 74 599 11:00 P.I'I. 0 76 35 32 177 53 0 373 12:00 I'IIDNISHT 0 0 25 32 177 38 0 272 ... TABLE VII SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS USING BOYNTON BEACH GENERATION RATES ULI RATE USED FOR GUEST ROO~S SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS - WEEKDAY JOB NU"BER: 4677.01 JOB NA"E: CATALINA CEtHRE DATE: JUL Y 27! 1988 HOTEL ------------------------------------------ OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB GUEST ROOII REST/LOUNGE CONFERENCE ROO" TOTAL PEAK DEI'IAND: 112 732 87 63 177 126 74 1371 HOUR OF THE DAY 6:00 A.". 3 0 0 .') 177 25 0 lj"" ..... '.J, 7:00 A.I'I. " 59 2 32 150 25 0 290 .... 8:00 A.". 71 132 4 ., 115 ','" 37 415 .... ...J 9:00 A.". 104 307 9 32 97 25 74 648 10:(lO A.". 112 498 17 32 80 25 74 838 11:00 A.I'I. 112 637 26 32 62 38 74 980 12:00 NOON 101 710 44 32 53 63 74 1076 1:00 P .11. 101 732 61 32 53 88 74 1141 2:00 P.II. 109 710 52 32 62 76 74 1114 3:00 P.". 104 695 52 32 62 69 74 1089 4:00 P.". 86 637 44 44 BO 63 74 1027 5:00 P.II. 53 578 61 63 106 88 74 1023 6:00 P.l'l. 26 600 7B 63 124 113 74 1079 7:00 P.II. 8 651 87 63 133 126 74 1142 B:OO P.". B 637 87 63 159 126 74 1154 9:00 P.II. 3 447 87 63 168 126 74 968 10:00 P.II. 3 23-4 7B 44 177 113 37 687 11:00 P.II. 0 95 61 32 177 aa 0 453 12: 00 IIIDNIGHT 0 0 44 32 177 63 0 315 .... '----' . .. Kim/ey-Horn and AssociatesJ Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive. West Palm Beach, FL33407 .(407)845-0665 Raleigh. Charlotte. Nashville. Virginia Beach. Washington. Dallas. Phoenix. West Palm Beach. Tampa, Orlando. Fl Lauderdale. Vera Beach. Fl Myers May 16, 1988 Revised June 30, 1988 4677.01 (07)P87 -55 Ms. Tambri Heyden City of Boynton Beach 120 NE Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 Re: Catalina Center/Study Revised to Include Gerulaitis Resort Dear Ms. Heyden: As requested, we have revised the parking analysis for Catalina Center located in Boynton Beach, Florida. This revision is a comprehensive document which includes a reduction of the amount of office square footage and the addition of a Gerulaitis Resort (health club/tennis center) along with all previous changes to the site, with the exception of the exclusion of the McDonald's outparcel. The McDonald's outparcel was not included at the City's request. As a result of the difference in parking peak characteristics of the exchanged land uses (office to health club), the demand at the Catalina Center peaks at 1:00 PM and '8:00 PM. These peaking characteristics are reflected in the tables and buffer calculations. The analysis was based on the City of Boynton Beach parking code; parking generation rates recommended by the Urban Land Institute (ULI), ULI--the Urban Land Institute Shared Parking, 1983; parking generation rates recommended by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Parking Generation--An Interim Report, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1985; and the shared parking recommendations of the Urban Land Institute, ULI--The Urban Land Institute Shared Parking, 1983. All rates used in this analysis represent peak season demand. Differences in seasonal peaks which exist among the land uses proposed were conservatively ignored. Shared parking is an integral part of the Catalina Center analysis. Shared parking is defined as parking space which can be used by two or more land uses without conflict or encroachment. In order for shared parking to be utilized, the peak accumulation of parked vehicles generated by different but adjacent land uses must not be concurrent. Building client relationships since 1967 "- '- , ii' --, I rro /, IIJJ " L0,[[T;DL/@r;Ja!JJGfl[jf1 I I I r- I I I Ms. Tambri Heyden -2- May 16, 1988 Revised June 30, 1988 Catalina Center will consist of four land uses: office, retail, health club with ancillary facilities, and hotel with restaurant, lounge, and conference facilities contained within the hotel. Considering the land use mix, maximum parking accumulation will occur on weekdays. An analysis has been made, of the northern parcel, which contains 14-6,325 square feet of retail space, and the southern parcel, which contains 33,338 square feet of office, 24-,608 square feet of health facilities, and a l66-room hotel with its auxiliary uses including 18 suites. The north and south parcels were analyzed separately and combined. The analysis was based on information provided by Ocean Properties, on the January 21, 1985, site plan of the total development, the August 27, 1986, site plan of the retail parcel, information provided verbally in August, 1987, the outparcel site plan of December 28, 1987, and supplemental information provided in 1988. Our analysis demonstrates that the proposed parking will be sufficient to accommodate the parking demands of both the northern and southern parcels, whether they are considered individually or together. Northern Parcel ULI and ITE are the most widely recognized sources of parking generation data. For a retail development of the size of Catalina Center, ULI recommends'a rate of four spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area. This would indicate that 586 spaces should be provided for the northern parcel. ITE recommends a weekday parking rate for peak season (Thanksgiving to Christmas) of 3.25 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross leasable area, which would require Catalina Center to provide 476 spaces for the retail parcel. As per the approved retail s1 te plan, a total of 692 spaceS are proposed for the retail parcel, 106 (18.1%) more than required by ULI rates and 216 (45.4-%) more than indicated by the rrE peak season rates. The Boynton Beach parking code, for retail use, is generalized to accommodate all shopping center sizes. The code requires five parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area. According to ULI, this is a rate appropriately applied to retail developments greater than 600,000 square feet, over four times the size of the proposed Catalina Center retail parcel. Under the Boynton Beach parking code, the Catalina Center retail parcel would be required to provide 732 parking spaces. , ) 4677.01(07)P87-55 .Ie =-, I , '1 r'~R~,,7 0 ",., ,~.F, ~,"'" ! I L~LLiJJU@UOUL(QUfJD Ms. Tambri Heyden -3- May 16, 1988 Revised June 30, 1988 l I I I I I I i I Southern Parcel Given the hotel/office/health club/restaurant land use mix proposed for the southern parcel, it is reasonable to assume that shared parking will occur within the parcel itself. Analysis of the site plan shows that numerous parking spaces wi thin the parcel are convenient to the four land uses which will allow shared parking to occur. The nature and location of the health club suggests that many of the patrons of the club will be office employees, hotel guests, residents of the adjacent Catalina Club and users of more than one use in the club. These factors permit a reduction in the parking provided. The 41 spaces internal to the health club at the peak demand represent 3% of the vehicles using a parking space on site. These vehicles have a primary trip purpose at one of the other uses on site (hotel, office, retaH). According to personnel at local health club facilities, the majority of trips to a health club are secondary trips; therefore, a 50% rate was used. The swimming pool and outdoor courts are expected to generate demands entirely from the other uses on site. Therefore, a 100 percent internal capture was applied to these uses. Table I (attached) outlines the parking demand which can be expected for the southern parcel using ITE and/or ULI generation rates. As shown in Table 1, without considering shared parking, 575 parking spaces are required under ITE/ULI recommendations. i I I I I I , I I i Compared to ITE and ULI, the Boynton Beach parking code is more conservative for office, hotel, and restaurant/lounge land use, but requires fewer spaces for conference facilities. Parking demand for the southern parcel generated using the Boynton Beach parking code is shown in Table 2 (attached). As shown, without conside'ring shared parking, the Boynton Beach code would require 657 spaces to be provided for the southern parcel. As previously stated, the physical layout and mixed-use character of the southern parcel lends itself to shared parking. Table 3 (attached) shows the peak parking demand projected for Catalina Center's southern parcel using the generation rates recommended by ITE/ULI, and considering the shared parking recommendations of ULI. As seen, 486 spaces are required to meet the peak parking demand, well below the 586 proposed for the site. Table 4 (attached) shows the peak parking demand for the southern parcel using Boynton Beach rates for parking generation, and ULI recommendations for shared parking. As seen, under these criteria, peak parking demand will be 537 spaces. The 586 spaces proposed represents a projected surplus of 49 spaces. i .J 4677 .OH07)P87-55 . I [1,/70 ...... r-ur l ~~D{7f!DU@fj'c:hj@[J'[JiJ (- I Ms. Tambri Heyden -~- May 16, 1988 Revised June 30, 1988 Based on the above analysis, parking proposed for the southern parcel of Catalina Center should prove sufficient to handling its parking needs. Total Development Given the mixed-use character and physical layout of the Catalina Center site, the most reasonable approach for analysis of the total development is through use of ULI shared parking recommendations. A total of 1,278 parking spaces are proposed for the development. Projected parking demand for the total site using ULI's shared parking recommendations are shown in Tables 5, 6, and 7 (attached). Tables 5 and 6 use the ITE/ULI parking generation rates applied in Table 2 for land uses other than retail. Table 5 uses the peak season rates for retail generation, and Table 6 uses ULI rates for retail generation. Based on discussions with Boynton Beach City staff, as the various hotel components are being evaluated separately, the ULI rate of 1.0 space per hotel room and the ULI residential rate of 1.6 for the hotel suites is the appropriate parking generation rate to be used in the analysis. Table 7 reflects this rate for the hotel room and suite generation and Boynton Beach code rates for all other uses. As shown, considering shared parking, the number of parking spaces recommended for Catalina Center ranges from 886 to 1,128 depending on the generation rate selected. It should be noted that in all the above scenarios, except where the Boynton codes are applied to each land use, sufficient parking space is provided on site even without considering shared parking. For the remainder of this analysis, the more conservative Boynton Beach rates reflected in Table 7 will be applied. The City of Boynton Beach requires that a 10% buffer be provided to ensure that a sufficient number of parking spaces are available at the time of peak use. Based on consultation with City of Boynton Beach staff, and analysis of the layout of the total site plan, it will be conservatively assumed that the retail and the office uses share only from the available hotel parking of ~32 spaces. The restaurant outparcel may share from the hotel or retail. Also, due to the layout of the site which is not especially conducive to shared parking between.. the retail or restaurant and office uses, buffer calculations have been performed separately for retail, restaurant outparcel and office uses. By Boynton Beach code, the buffer is calculated as follows: Buffer = Surplus Shared Parking On-Site + Shared Parking Provided I I '-------~-- j 4677.0H07)P87-55 (~---ll II L~;;<~np,\V7, 'LI7=fl= j I' 1\~UL/lfUu"'-~U[JLrVI...Q) uu ,L__ '\ I I i Ms. Tambri Heyden -5- May 16, 1988 Revised June 30, 1988 The peak hours of parking demand for the site are 1:00 PM and 8:00 PM as shown on Table 7. At 8:00, the hotel usage will require 359 spaces of the 432 provided leaving 73 spaces available for sharing with the other uses. Neither the retail or the office/health club will require any shared parking at this time. The office/health club will use 49 of its 95 spaces, leaving 46 available spaces. The Marie Callenders restaurant outparcel will need to share 24 spaces to accommodate its parking code requirement of 83. A surplus of spaces of 73 - 24 = 49 spaces therefore exists for the hotel site, leaving a surplus of 49 + 46 = 95 spaces for the office/health club. The buffer for the office/health club (to three significant figures) is therefore: 95 95 + 58 x 100 = 62.1% As calculated above, during the peak hours of parking demand, 73 spaces of the 432 provided for the hotel are available for shared parking. Also as shown, 24 spaces will be shared at this time by the Marie Callenders outparcelleaving 73 - 24 = 49 spaces available to be shared with the retail. The peak demand of 637 spaces for the retail has been met by the 692 spaces provided. This leaves a surplus of 692 - 637 = 55 spaces on the retail site. Overall, the surplus for the retail portion is 55 + 49 = 104. The buffer for the retail (to three significant figures) is therefore: 104 692 + 40 x 100 = 14.2% During the peak hour of parking demand of the site, the demand for spaces at the Marie Callenders restaurant outparcel will be 100% of its total requirements (83 spaces). Since 59 spaces have been provided for the restaurant, 24 spaces will need to be shared with the hotel. The buffer for the restaurant outparcel is: 104 59 + 24 = 125.3% At 1 :00 PM the buffers are also met. The hotel will re'quire 215 of the 432 spaces provided leaving 217 to share with the other uses on site. The office/health club will require 120 spaces, therefore needing to share 25 spaces from the hotel. The retail center will demand 732 spaces, therefore needing to share 40 spaces from the hotel. Marie Callenders will not require any sharing at 1:00 PM~ Considering these demands, the surplus shared parking is 217 - 25 - 40 = 152 spaces. The buffer for the office/health club is: 152 95 + 58 x 100 = 99.3% ) 4677.01(07)P87-55 ',- ,I ~ IiCCr:0JO@!jo[JflQ)[J'[;f} i I I... '1 I I Ms. Tambri Heyden -6- May 16, 1988 Revised June 30, 1988 The buffer for the retail is: 69i:240 x 100 = 20.8% The buffer for Marie Callenders is; 152 lOL 59 + 24 x 100 = 183. 70 Although the site demand is similar at 1:00 PM and 8:00 PM, the buffers are greater at 1:00 since the surplus comes from the hotel. In other words, the entire surplus is available for the health club and retail. It is seen that using the Boynton Beach generation rates, both the office and retail parcels meet the Boynton Beach buffer requirement of 10%. Based on the above analysis, the 1,278 spaces provided for the total development should prove sufficient in handllng the parking demands of the development. If you have any questions regarding this analysis, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, for Steven G. Godfrey, P.E. Vice President JFB:SGG:SOR/mec Attachments 4677 .01 (07)P87-55 i I I I , I I I I i I I I I ! ~ I~ . ::;=, ~~ I~ v III 0 0 '" N 0 ~I g 1.0 V "" ..... 00 .::I- '" .- U 00 .::I- .::l- N N '" '" ...... g.ro -I '" Q~ VI/) 0:: ~ c '-==== 0 ?? '* ?? ?? * * '* '* '* '* .- ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '* U '" 0 0 ::l -I ..... -0 V 0:: -~ , "" N 0 0 00 '" N 0 .::I- 00 Q o u 00 00 '" -I .::l- N N '" '" .::I- _ ro -I -I Z ..... 0< Vl ~ en r.u * * * Q ... - * * * C ~ V ...l c c c ro ~ Z u :J 0 0 0 1.0 Z - 1.0 ... ... ... ::l - ~ ::l .. C C C * * * ro ~ 0 LI.l >. >. >. - - LI.l LI.l LI.l - ... = I/) 0 0 0 ...l ..J ..J III = l- I- l- I- V < < - CO CO CO :J :J - - - :J 1.0 c.. s.. c.. 0 0 Q '+-4 r.u ~ Z = .: . .: < 0< V ..... ... . ..... ro - . -+-: ... . . 1.0 LI.l :c ... 0"' 0- E l.1J ro III 0- -+-: III LI.l ..J I/) I/) 0:: III 0"' 1.0 I- c:Q ::J 0 0 III 0 . ... ... ... ... - ~ 0 0 0 U ..... ro ro ro ... 0< Q Z ro 0 0 0 '" U C V V V ro ~ I- Z ... V ..... "" C""I ..... 0 ::l III III III V ... 0< I/) c.. - - - - - - - - - III '" 0 0 0 0 \l) .::I- .::I- .::I- - .c ..J r.u . . . . N N N '" ... l- N ..... -I -I -I ..... .- ...l < ~ l.1J 0:: '" U - V 0:: ..J . . . . III III ... ... ... ... E III III III III III ::l < :J ..... ..... ..... ..... ... ... ... ... ... c.. ....... ... . . . . 0 ..... ro ro ro ro III l.1J .- 0- 0- 0- 0"' 0 C V V V V ... C 'Z I- III III III III III 1.0 ::l III III III III ro C = - V 00 00 0 0 00 00 0 ...... '" \0 1.0 l.1J ... "" 0 0 0 .::I- '" 0 N '" ::l C "" \0 ...... .::l- N N N ro :I: - -I ... .. .. III I- "" .::l- N .::I- ~ :J "" N -I 0 -I V I/) ... - 0 - .c t3 s.. 1.0 0 ro '+-4 V 0.. III III ... c :J ::l E 0 0 .- ... III - 0 ... . , -0 ~ 1.0 E III 0.. C ::l ::l V ... ... 0 E ro 0 0 ... 0:: ..... .- C C ::l ...l U U 0 ::l ro ro ~ 0:: I/) 1.0 1.0 ao V .c III ::l ::l V C ro ... .- - ..... ro ro ao .- u ..... ..... C V V ... ... C ... - ..... V ...l '+-4 ro 0 c ... ... III III ::l ..... V 0 V 0 0 V V 0 V :J 0 :I: c.. I- J: :I: 0:: c::: ...l ::E * CJ Z - o ~ z ~ < < ::E a- u.I Q o u.I ~ CJ < z :c - II) ~ 0 ~ Z a- o z N < u.I u.I ..J II) c:Q ::> < Q l- Z < ..l ...J u.I U ~ ~ Z ~ u.I :c l- ::J o II) .. II) u.I l- < ~ u.I o o u CJ Z - ~ ~ < a- :c u <: u.I cQ Z o l- Z >- o cQ "O~ o Vl ~ 0 ..... U 5-1ll OV) a::: c o ..... +-' *g "0 o Ct:: .... ~Vl o U .....Ill ...... V) (I i~ Ig Ii I o~ ~ N - 0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ * * * * * * * * * * 0000000 000 ~ 0 0 - - N N 0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - o +-' III Ct:: "0 C III E o Cl <: u.. (,) c ..... ~ ~ III 0.. . +-' "1 0" Vl o o q - - ~ ~ . +-' .... 0- Vl o o ~ . - ('f"\ ..-..t ~ ...... ~ ."1 +-' 0" .... Vl 0- Vl 0 o o ~ ~ - - - o 0 +-' ..... Vl C o +-' C - . . . . V') .:::: .t: .:::: .:::: E . . . . 0 0" 0" 0" 0" 0 VlVlVlVl~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ooo~ ~~~.:r- ~ ~ ~ ~ N .:::t- ~ N - o Vl ;:) "0 C III ...J ..0 .2 u o ..c u +-' ;;: ra .... 0 o :I: Vl +-' Vl ~ E ::::I 0 o 0 U Ct:: Vl ..... - _ C 0 o C +-' 000 0.. I- :I: E o o ~ +-' - ..... ~ C N ::::I . - - N Vl Vl Vl +-' +-' +-' III III III Vl Q) 0 0 +-' Vl Vl Vl III ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N .:r - - -- ....., ~ ..... ..... Vl Vl +-' +-' ..... III C 0 ::::I Vl ~ ~ 0 ~ '-0 -N~O~ N N N Vl +-' III Q) Vl Vl +-' III Q) Vl - Q) u ~ III 0- +-' ::l o - Vl +-' III ~ TABLE III SOUTHERN PARCEL PARKING DEPlAND USING ItE/ULI GENERATION SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS - WEEKDAY JOB NUPlBER: 4b77.02 JOB NAKE: CATALINA CENTER DATE: JUNE 30, 1988 HOTEL ------------------------------------------ OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB GUEST ROOM REST/LOUNGE CONFERENCE ROOP! TOTAL PEAK DEI1AND: 83 0 50 41 177 7b 148 575 HOUR OF THE DAY b:OO A. PI. 2 0 0 21 177 15 0 215 7:00 A.M. 17 0 21 150 15 0 204 8:00 A.I'!. 52 0 3 21 115 15 74 280 9:00 A.". 77 0 5 21 97 15 148 363 10:00 A. PI. 83 0 10 21 80 15 148 35b 11:00 A.M. 83 0 15 21 b2 23 148 351 12:00 NOON 75 0 2S 21 53 38 148 359 1:00 P.M. 75 0 3S 21 53 53 U8 385 2:00 P.I1. 81 0 30 21 b2 4b 148 387 3:00 P.I'!. 77 0 30 21 b2 42 148 379 4:00 P.K. 64 0 25 29 80 38 148 383 5:00 P.". 39 0 35 41 lOb 53 148 422 6:00 P.K. 19 0 45 41 124 68 148 445 7:00 P.K. 6 0 50 41 133 7b 148 454 8:00 P.". b 0 50 41 159 7b 148 480 9:00 P.". 2 0 50 41 168 76 148 48b 10:00 P.". 2 0 45 29 177 68 ].4 396 11:00 P.". 0 0 35 21 177 53 0 286 12:00 "IDNIGHT 0 0 25 21 177 38 0 2bl TABLE IV SOUTHERN PARCEL PARKING DEMAND USING BOYNTON BEACH GENERATION SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS - WEEKDAY JOB NU"BER: 4677 .02 JOB HAilE: CATALINA CENTER DATE: JUNE 30, 19B8 HOTEL ------------------------------------------ OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB GUEST RODIl REST/LOUNGE CONFERENCE ROOIl TOTAL PEAK DEIlAND: 112 0 B3 41 221 126 74 657 HOUR OF THE DAY 6:00 A.H. 3 0 0 21 221 25 0 270 7:00 A.H. 22 0 2 21 lB8 25.. 0 25B B:OO A.Il. 71 0 -4 21 144 25 37 301 9:00 A.If. 104 0 8 21 122 25 74 354 10: 00 A. Il. 112 0 17 21 99 25 74 34B 11: 00 A. H. 112 0 25 21 77 38 74 347 12:00 NOON 101 0 42 21 66 63 74 3116 1:00 P.Il. 101 0 58 21 66 88 74 408 2:00 P."'. 109 0 50 21 77 76 74 406 3:00 P.H. 104 0 50 21 77 69 74 395 4:00 P.Il. 86 0 42 29 99 63 74 393 5:00 P.Il. 53 0 58 41 133 88 74 447 6:00 P.H. 26 0 75 41 155 113 74 494 7:00 P.Il. B 0 83 41 166 126 74 498 8:00 P.". 8 0 83 41 199 126 74 531 9:00 P.". 3 0 83 41 210 126 74 537 10:00 P.H. 3 0 75 29 221 113 37 478 11:00 P.H. 0 0 58 21 221 BB 0 388 12:00 "IDNIGHT 0 0 42 21 221 63 0 346 TABLE V SHARED PARKINS ANALYSIS ITE RATES FOR RETAIL USE, ULI/ITE RATES FOR OTHER LAND USES SHARED PARKINS ANALYSIS - WEEKDAY JOB NUI'IBER: 4677.02 JOB NAI'IE: CATALINA CENTER DATE: JUNE 30, 1988 HOTEL ------------------------------------------ OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB SUEST ROOII REST/LOUNGE CDNFERENCE ROOI'I TOTAL PEAK DEIIAHD: 83 47& 50 41 117. 76 148 1051 HOUR OF THE DAY 6:00 A.I!. 2 0 0 21 177 IS 0 215 7:00 A.I'I. 17 38 21 150 15 0 242 8:00 A.II. 52 8& 3 21 115 15 74 365 9:00 A.II. 77 200 5 21 97 IS 148 503 10:00 A.II. 83 324 10 21 80 15 148 b90 11:00 A.". 83 414 15 21 62 23 148 7&5 12:00 NOON 75 462 25 21 S3 38 148 821 1: 00 P. II. 75 476 35 21 S3 53 148 861 2:00 P.". 81 462 30 21 62 46 149 848 3:00 P.". 77 4S2 30 21 62 42 148 932 4:00 P.". 64 414 25 29 SO 38 14S 797 5:00 P.". 39 376 35 41 106 53 148 798 b:OO P.". 19 390 45 41 124 bS 148 836 7:00 P.". 6 424 SO 41 133 76 148 877 8:00 P.Il. 6 414 SO 33 159 76 .. 148 B86 9:00 P.Il. 2 290 50 29 16S 76 148 764 10:00 P.Il. 2 152 45 21 177 68 74 540 11:00 P.Il. 0 62 3S 21 177 53 0 348 12: 00 IUDNIGHT 0 0 2S 21 177 38 0 261 , r TABLE VI SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS ULl RATES FOR RETAIL USE, ULI/ITE RATES FOR OTHER LAND USES SHARED PARKINS ANALYSIS - ~EEKDAY JOB NU"9ER: 4677.02 JOB NAIlE: CATALINA CENTER DATE: JUNE 30, 1998 HOTEL ------------------------------------------ OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB GUEST ROOK REST/LOUNGE CONFERENCE RODI! TOTAL PEAl< DE/lAMD: 83 586 ' SO 41 177 76 148 1161 HOUR OF THE DAY 6:00 A./l. 2 0 0 21 177 15 0 215 7:00 A./l. 17 47 21 150 15 0 251 B:OO A./l. 52 105 3 21 115 15 74 3B5 9:00 A./l. 77 246 5 21 97 IS 149 609 10:00 A./l. 83 398 10 21 BO 15 148 755 11: 00 A .11. 83 510 15 21 62 23 148 861 12:00 NOON 75 568 25 21 53 3B 148 928 , 1:00 P./l. 75 586 ~.. 21 53 53 148 971 ,h' 2:00 P./l. 81 568 30 21 62 46 148 955 3:00 P.I!. 77 557 30 21 62 42 148 936 4:00 P./l. 64 510 25 29 80 38 148 893 5:00 P.". 39 463 35 41 106 53 148 88S 6:00 P./l. 19 481 45 41 124 68 148 926 7:00 P./l. 0 S22 50 41 133 70 148 975 8:00 P./l. 0 510 50 41 159 7b 148 990 9:00 P./l. '1 357 50 41 168 7b 148 843 .. 10:00 P./l. 2 188 45 29 177 68 74 583 11:00 P./l. 0 70 35 21 177 53 0 362 12:00 /lIDNISHT 0 0 25 21 177 38 0 261 , c l' .. TABLE VII SHARED PARKINS ANALYSIS USINS BOYNTON BEACH 6ENERATION RATES ULI RATE USED FOR SUEST ROO"S SHARED PARKINS ANALYSIS - WEEKDAY JOB NUKBER: 4677.02 JOB NAKE: CATALINA CENTER DATE: JUNE 30, 1988 HOTEL ------------------------------------------ OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB 6UEST ROOK REST/LOUNSE CONFERENCE ROOII TOTAL PEAK OE"AND: 112 732 ' 83 41 177 12& 74 1345 HOUR OF THE DAY 6:00 A.". 3 0 0 21 177 25 0 226 7:00 A.II. 22 59 2 21 150 25 0 279 8:00 A.tI. 71 132 4 21 115 25 37 404 9:00 A.tI. 104 307 8 21 97 25 74 &37 10:00 A.II. 112 498 17 21 BO 25 74 826 11:00 fl.". 112 637 25 21 62 38 74 968 12:QO NOON 101 710 42 21 53 63 74 1063 1:00 P.". 101 732 58 21 53 88 ].4 1127 2:00 P.". 109 710 50 21 62 76 74 1101 3:00 P.". 104 695 50 21 62 69 ].4 1075 4:00 P.". 86 637 42 29 80 63 74 1010 5:00 P.II. 53 578 sa 41 106 sa 74 998 6:00 P.". 26 600 75 41 124 113 74 1053 7:00 P.II. 8 651 83 41 133 126 ].4 1116 8:00 P.II. 8 637 83 41 159 126 74 1128 9:00 P.". 3 447 83 41 168 126 ].4 942 10:00 P.". 3 234 75 29 177 113 37 668 11:00 P.lt 0 95 58 21 177 88 0 439 , 12:00 "IDNISHT 0 0 42 21 177 63 0 302 r .....-'!!II#' ,(it- ",r ,...~.( ,:. Kim/ey-Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive, West Palm Beach, FL33407 .(407) 845-0665 Raleigh. Charlotte, Nashville, Virginia Beach, Washington. Dallas. Phoenix. West Palm Beach. Tampa. Orlando. Fl Lauderdale, Vera Beach. Fl Myers May 16, 1988 Revised June 30, 1988 4677.0 I (07)P87 -55 Ms. Tambri Heyden City of Boynton Beach 120 NE Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 Re: Catalina Center/Study Revised to Include Gerulaitis Resort Dear Ms. Heyden: As requested, we have revised the parking analysis for Catalina Center located in Boynton Beach, Florida. This revision is a comprehensive document which includes a reduction of the amount of office square footage and the addition of a Gerulaitis Resort (health club/tennis center) along with all previous changes to _IJ.. the site, with the exception of the exclusion of the McDonald's outparcel. The ",.", McDonald's outparcel was not included at the City's request. As a result of the difference in parking peak characteristics of the exchanged land use~sof' to health club), the demand at the Catalina Center peaks at 1:00 PM an : d . These peaking characteristics are reflected in the tables and buffer calc . s. The analysis was based on the City of Boynton Beach parking code; parking generation rates recommended by the Urban Land Institute (ULI), ULI--the Urban Land Institute Shared Parking, 1983; parking generation rates recommended by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Parking Generation--An Interim Report, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1985; and the shared parking recommendations Of" Urban Land Institute, ULI-- The Urban Land Institute Shared Parking, 1983 All rates used in this analysis represent peak season demand. Differenc~s in. seasona peaks ~hich exist among the land uses i(op,osed were ,,/... conservatIvely IgnoredJ ~r- ( L-C {vl /-cf Vtct l'- V Shared parking is an integral part of the Catalina Center analysis. Shared parking is defined as parking space which can be used by two or more land uses without conflict or encroachment. In order for shared parking to be utilized, the peak accumulation of parked vehicles generated by different but adjacent land uses must not be concurrent. Building client relationships since 1967 .. .... ; ,'/'"C.. -; ," 1'1' ,', r:1~iiClr'vS ''-'/r',M11 " L U-,L;lnJU@~!OU1_l;Iu:;U I .I_~____.. I) . Ms. Tambri Heyden -2- May 16, 1988 Revised June 30, 1988 Catalina Center will consist of four land uses: office, retail, health club with ancillary facilities, and hotel with restaurant, lounge, and conference facilities contained within the hotel. Considering the land use mix, maximum parking accumulation will occur on weekdays. An analysis has been made of the northern parcel, which contains 146,325 square feet of retail space, and the southern parcel, which contains 33,338 square feet of office, 24,608 square feet of health facilities, and a 166-room hotel with its auxiliary uses including 18 suites. The north and south parcels were analyzed separately and combined. The analysis was based on information provided by Ocean Properties, on the January 21, 1985, site plan of the total development, the August 27, 1986, site plan of the retail parcel, information provided verbally in August, 1987, the outparcel site plan of December 28, 1987, and supplemental information provided in 1988. Our analysis demonstrates that the proposed parking will be sufficient to accommodate the parking demands of both the northern and southern parcels, whether they are considered individually or together. Northern Parcel ULI and ITE are the most widely recognized sources of parking generation data. For a retail development of the size of Catalina Center, ULI recommends a rate of four spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area. This would indicate that 586 spaces should be provided for the northern parcel. ITE recommends a weekday parking rate for peak season (Thanksgiving to Christmas) of 3.25 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross leasable area, which would require Catalina Center to provide ~' ,476 spaces for the retail parcel. As per the approved retail site plan, a total of 692 paces are proposed for the retail parcel, . more than required by &<6' 11 rates and...rf6 (4j.4~) more than indicated by the ITE peak season rates. ~/~ t~' The Boynton Beach parking code, for retail use, is generalized to accommodate aU shopping center sizes. The code requires five parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area. According to ULI, this is a rate appropriately applied to retail developments greater than 600,000 square feet, over four times the size of the proposed Catalina Center retail parcel. Under the Boynton Beach parking code, the Catalina Center retail parcel would be required to provide 732 parking spaces. , I I I i I ! ) 4677.oH07)P87-55 . t,. c,~c i~ 'J" i ' ! '.'~CITDU~fJOU-L@(J[!fJ I --,.- . '\ Ms. Tambri Heyden -3- May 16, 1988 Revised June 30, 1988 Southern Parcel Given the hotel/office/health club/restaurant land use mix proposed for the . southern parcel, it is reasonable to assume that shared parking will occur within ! the parcel itself. Analysis of the site plan shows that numerous parking spaces i with~n the parcel are convenient to the four land uses which will allow sha~ed' AI,R.# ' parkmg to occur. /1 1 t~. -';1 - TJ, , . V '" ~ . <J The nature and loca~ of the health club suggests that many 0 the p trons of the ~P~I )J-l' club will be office ?fnpl ees, hotel guests, residents of the adj cent Catalina Club ,(vV and users ofr ore than e use in the club. These factors per Ita reduction in the ~ i '" parking prj'*i, ed. The 41 paces internal to the health club at the peak demand {represent' 3 f the ve . les using a parking space on site. These vehicles hav ) ....v primary i purpose at one of the other uses on site (hotel, office etail).' ~ ~ According t personnel at local health club facilities, the majority of t . a All J".fL health club a e secondary trips; therefore, a 2.Q.% rate was used. The swimming {" ~,' - pool and outdo r courts are . ected to generate demands entirely from the other -M uses on site. Th efore, a OOrcent internal cap~ure was applied ~o these uses. otItl' '-'1'D'v1Q JJ ~ k(~t\h. -" k.o ~o( i60L.LL- : _ Table 1 (attached) outlines the parking deman'd' which tan be expected for the ! ,)J s~uthern par~el .using ITE and/.or ULI gene~ation rates. As ~hown in Table 1, .-.hl ' wIthout COnSl?enng shared parkmg,~arkmg spaces are reqUired, under ITE/ULI ~, ,! /.~ recommendatIons. 51(Pq'\- (,'1~ ht- ~ .~~ Compared to ITE and ULI, the Boynton Beach parking c~ore conservative 'I for office, hotel, and restaurant/lounge land use, but requires fewer spaces for i conference facilities. Parking demand for the southern parcel generated using the i , Boynton Beach parking code is shown in Table 2 (attached). As shown, without I considering shared parking, the Boynton Beach code would require~paces to be ~C(q provided for the southern parcel. 6fi-~ (P5f? fYV'.J: j ,dJ ' e-n, ;'l..e.A f As previously stated, the physical layout and mixed-use character of the seuthern ~<..L- parcel lends itself to shared parking. Table 3 (attached) shows the peak parking i demand projected for Catalina Center's southern parcel using the generation rates recommended by ITE!U!oIb and considering the shared parking recommendations of ULI. As ~n,...4-8f) s~~s are required to meet the peak parking demand, well below the 8 roposed for the site. Table 4 (attached) shows the peak parking demand for t e southern parcel using Boynton Beach rates for parking generation, and ULI recommendations for shared parking. As seen, under these criteria, peak 1 parking demand will be.~aces. The 586 spaces proposed represents a projected ! surplus o!-M' spaces. 579~-nz: " A' / 7 . 6W . ~.. *~ I~ , I f $~1 .,~ ~fj ~ .~ ,~ tt~ ~ A~ . 'ifr- 4677 .OH07)P87-55 ~ a, /l ~kd q~ ~~.O/, I.~ ~ pJutw,~ ? ' - -t' '--- k?J:. - -Jif ru\.z4 ;:;:r;a~tt ~"~ ' fed.- .~Pc~'~ .bd~ \ ~ '.i:L~ te~ May 16, 1988 i ~ f7' ~oIfrA evised June 30, 1988 I~...,t . Based on the above analysis, parking proposed for the southern parcel of Catalina Center should prove sufficient to handling its parking needs. -------..... ;'1 ,'----- " I I rv""" t;-' ~. " ,'-Lf7 :: L ,~~LCifDL';1;!r'lC!~ '-u'(Q;[J[]fJ i · Ms. Tambri Heyden Total Development Given the mixed-use character and physical layout of the Catalina Center site, the most reasonable approach for analysis of the tot opment is through use of ULI shared parking recommendations. A total 1,2 arking spaces are proposed.. for the development. ' ~ Projected parking demand for the total site' ~i~g ULI's shared parking recommendations are shown in Tables 5, 6, and 7 (attached). Tables 5 and 6 use the ITE/ULI parking generation rates applied in Table 2 for land uses other than retail. Table 5 uses the peak season rates for retail generation, and Table 6 uses ULI rates for retail generation. Based on discussions with Boynton Beach City staff, as the various hotel components are being evaluated separately, the ULI rate of 1.0 space per hotel room and the ULI residential rate of 1.6 for the hotel suites is the appropriate parking generation rate to be used in the analysis. Table 7 reflects this rate for the hotel room and suite generation and Boynton Beach code rates for all other uses. ' t1 ~ ~~ As shown, considering shared parkin the ~f~g spaces recommended for Catalina Center ranges from 886 to 1,128 epending on the generation rate selected. It should be noted that I above scenarios, except where the Boynton codes are applied to each land use, sufficient parking space is provided on site even without considering shared parking. For the remainder of this analysis, the more conservative Boynton Beach rates reflected in Table 7 will be applied. The City of Boynton Beach requires that a 10% buffer be provided to ensure that a sufficient number of parking spaces are available at the time of peak use. Based on consultation with City of Boynton Beach staff, and analysis of the layout of the total site plan, it will be conservatively assumed that the retail and the office uses share only from the available hotel parking of 432 spaces. The restaurant outparcel may share from the hotel or retail. Also, due to the layout of the site which is not especially conducive to h re arkin between the retail or restaurant and .office uses, bu fer calculations have been performed separately for retail, restaurant outparcel and office uses. _____ i d.. _._ ' i . nej,<J .".~, ~ A.-' re~lni By Boynton Beach code, the buffer IS calculated as follows: be.. tJ-l/owe.d r I Buffer = Surplus Shared Parking On-Site + Shared Parking Provided '\ ~ 4677.oH07)P87-55 ...... - ~hA~~aM- ~/:tJt)~ ~ ti)A%~ _ -- ~$ ~ 16J- ~ ?s~ .'-//' 1 +-~l'1 ~~ 01./5 / 1-3-:l..~ -4+ ~~i-~ 13;;1.-.1 ~&-k ~ ~/1 -~8-4--+ -z.. IS~~ f$li' 01- ~ 'I J.... f.ro4'1 1., F>.is ~ .25%.--d. '?"Jj-+1-++=k>l'" t)'rO,-4tl'/ 7'. w.{~CJls.sf '-;::;;j =-1.2.~/~ 16~ 11.!F ...., ~ 61 B fo..v{ d frel,f li:JJ;' - ~. _ ~ ~ ~~ =--55.2- PnnC1(Jt4 /'1 - I .. ... - "1-~A - ~ 0\;-- .-\- cu.. ~ ",t I 'T -'-"'-.:lk-....A DI \ ll~ b3 ::: n5 IOj + ~"L"" 28 -"h'. ~ '7'~ IO~ ~ ,-rt-,?$';:;.-.{/.. ~ a;e;- (.~OO" ~17-71.-44;;:1 -f4- .~ 7,;z / "rp~ .-r-;;tl1 ~~~S; ~3~~ -&1 ~~/"tfJ9S-~ /04- 13~~ 11,;L~ ~ ,~~-- r ., ~,4/ ~ g>_~6Jt} fhm. _~*" ~~ I sf ~ --r1'3. ~ ~ 35'7 :... ...,~a.L f3a- . I Yl.;<I - ,- -- ~~ 1!f '13 - ;r~ -1t171l/)~=- ~~ 51. '1~ % ~~r~!~ fiJ cf,"cm~. u1 ~5tJ~ r-e1(. + f;?n7{~~ i .. I ~+~ rtl-/,-:;.'~ 6-~~~+- ~3 eW--t-"7o ::3E- 0- - -UV ' - ~ - ,~ ~A.AtJ-t'~ _ ~ ~ ~ 7''7 I ~ J rr-- - ~ -" ~ J~ ~ .361/ +?>cr~ ~ ~. =-~efo IICJ.,.-+ ~?+~ ~,..~ 1:' . ". -'-~----~1 ' , : ,V'7 ?_-..__J7 rz 1""",'( ~ I Lj'ul/u 7J!';(j;lI~;o!,J1JCIv!JfJ . , I ::::U ~-_.- ., .. Ms. Tambri Heyden -6- May 16, 1988 Revised June 30, 1988 ~ I I I I I i i I I The buffer for the retail is: )/ lof- I+,r~" 69~0 x 100 =~ / The buffer for Marie Callenders is: ~ ~ ../u::t; ~ I!/~ ,f!,.f- ~ ~ .;2<J~ ~ao7JJ i / ~ xl00~ ~(P"3rf r;J t - . ~ I / 1'7 1.:/,5/.&1 % r 'jDO - 8"7 ! / Although the site demand is similar at 1:00 PM and 8:00 PM, the buffers are I / greater at 1:00 since the surplus comes from the hotel. In other words, the entire ~~ II I surplus is available for the health club and retail, 9'1' '\ It is seen that using the Boynton Beach generation rates, both the office and retail \, parcels meet the Boynton Beach buffer requirement of 10%. . 1~1:t. I Based on the above analysis, the ~8 spaces provided for the total development should prove sufficient in handling the parking demands of the development. I L If you have any questions regarding this analysis, please do not hesitate to ~pntact us. Very truly yours, for Steven G. Godfrey, P.E. Vice President JFB:SGG:SOR/mec Attachments / 4677.01 (07)P87-55 .. . ':" '.. ,- --~-=---=-----=-n----~II < r", ~'I,I n '<-.1.'-;:::..", ,,"""'-'" : L '':'L,/l,.,U10JU@)j'oU1.kJ.I1UUJ L~__ I ~. ~-~ 1 ! I i o rv/: Ms. Tambri Heyden ~ {}D -~y t/J( \ \ · i ~\dl, / ~ ~0 t.L--/ :J : ~ The peak hours of parking demand for the si te are I :00 PM and 8:00 PM ~~wg. j I on Table 7 ~tB:OO, the hotel usage will require 359 spaces of the ~de~- · _~, CfL/ leaving ~ck~available for sharing with the other uses.' '. OJj3 ~ .' . ., .' . . The , office/health club will us@', 0 1 95 spaces, leaving ~abl,~e s ~~sss. The Marie Callenders restaurant outpareel will ~eed to share ..f<?!f)itJtlices t~ accommodate its parking code requirement of~~ fA surplus of spaces ~ -~ = .......-~spaces therefore exists for the hotel site, l~aving a surplus of..,.. ~ -.-J-l'd.5 ~a~es for the office/health club. The buffer for the office/health club (to three I fy significant figures) is therefore: - , '/ ,/ ',I rks c:-., 0/ ' a : 11 _ )1AIPII?', _:', 31,W. - 4-;%. 95 + x ~O , . k 11 -/i#~_' ~J ~ ' ~ v:>j -/-Pr qi:j _' '~,;o ~ :(/ As calculated above, dunn he k hou~f parking demand, 3 spaces of the 432. provided for the hotel are available. for shared parking. Also as shown,~~aces will be shared at this time by the Marie Callenders outparcelleaving 73 -~ JPr'W spaces available to be shared with 1bSl retail. The peak demand of 637 space~ J_Q.r the retail has been met by the ~~ces provided. This leaves a surplus of...8'Jf' - 637 = .M~paces on the retail site. Overall, the surplus for the retail portion is >>' + 49 = 104. The buffer for the retail (to three significant figures) is therefore: 51-r-+G =-Cftp ~(, 13..11% 692 + 40 x 100 = ~ -5- May 16, 1988 Revised June 30, 1988 t5, .,,+~ PeA ~ -H:J1f"f5" ~ -..l2j6~.;)-t1/~ g-1 ' /- At 1:00 PM the buffers are also met. The hotel will require 215 of the 432 spaces provided lea~i!,.8 217 to share with the other uses on, sj~t~. The office/health club will require ~ $ces, therefore needing to share ~;f~p~ces. from the hotel. The retail center will demand 732 spaces, therefore neeCling to share 40 spaces from the hotel. Marie Callenders will not require any sharing at 1:00 PM. Considering these demands, the surplus shared parking is 217 - 2~ - 40 = 152 spaces. The buffer for the office/health club is:' . . ...J...5.2-1 0 4- ';211 -" q -- 44- -=-- 10 f- ~xl00=~ J1t 5'1.10/0 \ \ i I I I I I I i I I ! i i I -I J I I I I I : I ~ I I i I I i , ~ During the pea~-pafKTng-de~-~nd--~fthe5rte',.:t e demand for spaces at :~ Marie Callenders restaurant outparcel will be 100% of its al re uirements JilSJ~1 spaces). Since 59 spaces have been provided for the restaurant, ces will need to be shared with the hotel. The buffer for the restaurant outparcel is. aJ;'f;UO 4677.01(07)P87-55 ., .- .", - . rr ~ i I' 0 Ii SJ ' I '-6' I ~I ~; I~ \~ ,r-' oi:'5 I ts ~, ~ o 0 0 --....." ~ ~ lJ) t- -~ l""I 00 C7'\ N 0 .::t- oo - Q o u 00 .::to N N "'" "'" .::t- ,~ ,.... cO -c -c Z ..... < V'l :s . l.LJ * * * CIl .... Q - * * * c: () 4) ....l c: c: c: cO () Z u :J 0 0 0 1.. Z 1.. .... .... .... =' - =' ... c: c: c: * * * cO - ~ ~ 0 U.l >. >. >. - - U.l U.l U.l - .... = V'l 0 0 0 ....l ,...J ....l CIl = l- I- l- I- 4) < < - r:!l r:!l co :J ~ - - - ~ 1.. c.. 1.. c.. 0 Q Q .... Z l.LJ . ..; 4) = .... +-, < < 4) "1 ..; . .... cO - 0- . 1.. l.LJ :c .... 0- "1 .... E l.LJ cO CIl 0- "1 CIl U.l a V'l II) 0::: CIl 0- 1.. I- ;:) 0 0 CIl 0 . .... .... .... .... - .:::t 0 0 0 u ..... cO cO cO .... < Q Z cO 0 0 0 "'" u c: 4) Q) Q) cO 4) .r:: I- Z .. 4) ..... l""I l""I -c 0 =' CIl CIl CIl 4) .... c.. - - - - - - - - - CIl < V'l "'" 0 0 0 0 \J) .::t- .::t- .::t- - .r:: ..J l.LJ . . . . N N N It'\ .... .... N -c -c -c -c ..... ..... ..J < ~ l.LJ = "0 U - 4) = ....l . . . . CIl CIl .... .... .... .... E CIl CIl CIl CIl CIl =' < ::> .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... CIl c.. - .... . . . . 0 ..... cO cO cO cO .... l.LJ ..... 0- 0- 0- 0- 0 c: Q) 4) 4) 4) c: Z CIl CIl CIl CIl CIl 1.. =' CIl CIl CIl CIl .... c: cO L. = - 4) 00 00 0 0 00 00 0 r--. It'\ \J) =' l.LJ .... l""I 0 0 0 .::t- -c C7'\ 0 N C7'\ cO :c c: l""I \J) r--. .::to -c N N N .... - ... CIl .... l""I .::t- N .::to 4) ::> l""I N -c 1.. 0 -c 4) V'l .... - 0 -c .r:: 4) L. U 0 1.. .... cO Q) 0- CIl .... c: CIl =' 0 :J 0 E .... ..... .... "0 .... CIl CIl - 0 0- ..0 L. E c: =' =' 4) .... .... 0 E cO -c 0 0 .... c: c: 0::: =' ....l U 0 ..... u =' cO cO CIl 0::: V'l 1.. L. 00 CIl 4) .r:: CIl =' =' Q) c: cO I .... .- -c ..... cO cO 00 ..... u .... - ..... ..... '0 c: Q) 4) .... .... c: Q) ,...J .... cO c: .... .... CIl CIl =' .... Q) 0 4) 0 0 4) Q) 0 4) :J l 0 :c a.. l- t: ! 0::: 0::: ....l ~ * 1 \ I j l <.., ~'o ~. I) c:> . \ ?: ~,~ #\i ~ 0 ~ ~~\~ '^ -.D <:) ~ <- -~~ g() c"\ a-- c.. o (,) .... ~ .....co , '8 ~ ..... rJl \ I) ~ I ..( ~ , ?: ~ ~ ~ \ ~ 0 cO --.::> \ .c '%. p!. .; .; \ .... -0 . .... .- ~ \ c.. .. t1' . ~ ~ ~ g- I 0 IJ'/ . .... IJ'/ IJ'/ ~ ()O \ E <:) ~ 0- E ~ ~ ~ ~ <:) .... cO (1) \ Q) 0- IJ'/ <:) 0 Q) <:) <:) 0 ~ ~ \ C"l ct. 0 ~ IJ'/ ~~ IJ'/ <:) \1"\ "" ~ ~ .... ~ - <:) c"\ .... - .... \1"\ \1"\ '8 c c"\ <:) - - \1"\ ~ . N t~ ':) .... c"\ c"\ <:) <:) ~ ~ - - ~ ;;:t. . . . - - A -- 8 . - .... <" .... -' ~ ~ c"\ .... .... .... cO "'" 0.. ~~0 ..( I) ~ ..J ?: \ti ~ . . . . IJ'/ IJ'/ ~ () .c ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ J -%- ~ .... .... .... .... 0 .... cO cO c.. ~ . . . . ~ ~ Q) .... t1' t1' t1' t1' 0 IJ'/ c.. ~ IJ'/ IJ'/ IJ'/ IJ'/ IJ'/ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ g() <:) <:) g() g() \1"\ ~ g() <:) <:) =- .... ~ c"\ <:) ~ .s c"\ -.D t- =- .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ c"\ =- <" =- C>- a c"\ <" .... \ "'" \ ~ 'i rJl -::: ~~ b I 8 c:Q ~ ~ ~ E :3 ? IJ'/ IJ'/ S 0 ~ IJ'/ 0 -0 ./:). ~ E ~ ~ ~ ct. ~ ;? 0 0 .... c ~ U U 0 :3 cO 00 .-1 p!. rJl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c -s IJ'/ .... ~ .... .... ~ .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q) <a ..... ~ .... 0 ~ ~ ~ .... 0 0 0 .... ~ 0 Q) , :r. .-1 0 0.. r- \ l \ \ =-\t- t- \1"\ -.D "4' . ---------- ~ . TABLE II I SOUTHERN PARCEL PARkING DE"AND USING I~E/ULI GENERATION SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS - WEEKDAY JOB NU"'BER: 4677.02 JOB NAI1E: CATALINA CENTER DATE: JUNE 30, 1988 HOTEL ------------------------------------------ OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH ~UEST ROOH REST/LOUNGE CONFERENCE ROO" TOTAL ~~f PEAK DEI'IAND: 83 0 SO 177 76 148~ ~ fY2 HOUR OF THE DAY ftr ~3 6:00 A.". 2 0 0 21 177 15 0 215 7:00 A.". 17 0 21 150 15 0 204 8:00 A.I1, 52 0 3 21 115 15 74 280 9: 00 A,I'I. 77 0 5 21 97 15 148 363 10:00 A,". ~ 0 10 21 80 15 148 356 ,83 ' . 11:00 A,", 0 15 21 62 23 148 351 12:00 NOON 75 0 25 21 53 . 38 148 359 I 1:00 P,I'I. 75 0 35 21 "'" 53 148 I 385 . .J,) \ 387 2:00 P.M. 81 0 30 21 62 46 148 I 3:00 P.", 77 0 30 21 62 42 148 I 379 4:00 P."'. 64 0 25 29 80 38 148 383 5:00 P.M. 39 0 35 41 lOb 53 48 422 6:00 P.I'!. 19 0 45 41 124 b8 148 445 7:00 P.I'!. 6 0 SO 41 133 7b 148 454 8:00 P.II. 0 0 SO :\ 41 159 7b 148 480 9:00 P.". 2 0 SO I ) 168 76 148 ~'~h \ 41 "- 10:00 P."', 2 0 45 29 07~ 68 74 3% 52 11:00 P.", 0 0 35 21 177 53 0 286 12:00 I'!IDNIGHT 0 0 25 21 ~V 38 0 261 . f . TABLE IV SOUTHERN PARCEL PARKING DEKAND USING BOYNTON BEACH GENERATION SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS - NEEKDAY JOB NU"BER: 4077.02 JOB NAKE: CATALINA CENTER DATE: JUNE 30, 198B HOTEL ------------------------------------------ OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB GUEST ROO" REST/LOUNGE CONFERENCE ROOI'! TOTAL PEAK DE"AND: 112 0 83 ~ 221 126 74 ~~ ~ d HOUR OF THE DAY b~q 6:00 A.". 3 0 0 21 221 25 0 270 7:00 A.". 22 0 2 21 188 25 0 258 8:00 A.". 71 0 4 21 144 25 37 301 9:00 A.I'!. 104 0 8 21 122 25 74 354 10:00 A.". 112 0 17 21 99 25 74 348 11:00 A.". 112 0 25 21 77 38 74 347 12:00 NOON 101 0 42 21 b6 63 74 366 1 : 00 P. K . 101 0 58 21 66 88 74 408 2:00 P.I'\. 109 0 50 21 77 76 74 406 3:00 P.K. 104 0 50 21 77 69 74 395 4:00 P.". 86 0 42 29 99 63 74 393 5:00 P.I'!. 53 0 58 41 133 88 74 447 b:OO P.". 26 0 75 41 155 113 74 484 7:00 P.". 8 0 83 41 1b6 120 74 498 8:00 P.". 8 0 83 41 199 12b 7'@ 9:00 P.". 3 0 83 41 ytf:;2- 210 126 74 537 +~ 10:00 P.". 3 0 75 29 221 113 37 478 (i1-~ 11:00 P.". 0 0 58 21 221 88 0 388 12: 00 IHDNlSHT 0 0 42 21 221 b3 0 346 "I .. TABLE V SHARED PARKINS ANALYSlS ITE RATES FOR RETAIL USE, ULI/ITE RATES FOR OTHER LAND USES SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS - WEEKDAY JOB NUIIBER: 4677.02 JOB NAltE: CA T AU HA CENTER DATE: JUNE 30, 1988 HOTEL ------------------------------------------ OFFICE RETArL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB GUEST ROOIl REST/LOUNGE CONFERENCE ROOM TOTAL PEAK DEMMD: 83 476 50 .~r~ 177 76 148 10Sl HOUR OF THE DflY 1ft-' t(P- 6:00IUI. 2 0 0 21 177 15 (l 215 7:00 A./I. 17 38 21 150 15 0 242 8:00 A.II. 52 Sb 3 21 115 15 74 365 9:00 fI./I. 77 200 5 21 97 15 148 563 10:00 A.II. 83 324 10 21 80 15 148 680 11 :00 A. /I. 83 414 15 21 62 23 148 765 12:00 NoDN 75 462 25 21 53 38 148 821 1 : 00 P. /I . 75 476 3S 21 53 53 148 861 2:00 P.II. 81 462 30 21 62 46 148 848 3:00 P.t'!. 77 452 30 21 h2 42 148 832 4:00 P./I. 64 414 25 29 80 38 148 797 5:00 P./I. 39 376 35 41 lOb 53 148 798 6:00 P./I. 19 390 45 41 124 68 148 836 7:00 P.II. 0 ..2.. 50 76 148 877 8:00 P.II. 6 414 50 76 148 9:00 P.II. 2 290 50 7b 148 10:00 P./I. 2 152 45 21 rtfr 177 68 74 540 -- 11:00 P.". 0 62 35 21 177 53 0 348 q~ 12:00 /lIDNI6HT 0 0 25 21 177 38 0 261 .. " 'eI- ' , " , TABLE VI SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS UlI RATES FOR RETAIL USE, ULI/ITE RATES FOR OTHER lAND USES SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS - WEEKDAY JOB NU"BER: 4677.02 JOB NA"E: CATALINA CENTER DATE: JUNE 30, 19BB HOTEL ------------------------------------------ OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB GUEST ROO" REST/LGUNGE CONFERENCE ROO" TOTAL PEAK DE"AND: 83 586 50 )1~7 177 76 148 1161 HOUR OF THE DAY lJV ~J-- 6:00 A.I'\. 2 0 0 21 177 15 0 215 7:00 A.I'l. 17 47 21 150 15 0 251 8:00 A.I'!. 52 105 3 21 115 15 74 385 9:00 A.I'!. 77 246 5 21 97 15 148 609 10:00 A.". 83 39B 10 21 BO 15 U8 755 11:00 A.I'!. 83 510 15 21 62 23 148 861 12:00 NOON 75 56B 25 21 53 3B 1-48 928 1:00 P.I'l. 75 586 35 21 53 53 148 971 2:00 P.". Bl 56B 30 21 62 46 148 955 3:00 P.". 77 557 30 21 62 42 148 93b 4: 00 P .It 64 510 25 29 80 38 148 B93 5:00 P.I'\. 39 463 35 41 106 53 148 B85 6:00 P.". 19 481 45 41 124 68 14B 926 7:00 P.I'!. 6 522 50 41 133 76 14B 975 B:OO P.lt 6 510 50 41 159 76 148 0D + f;z. ~f- Ilk J6 9:00 P.II. 2 357 50 148 B43 I D jJ. /;~V ~ oV 74 583 10:00 P.". 2 IB8 45 29 f 77?f!/;o 6B 11:00 P.II. 0 76 35 21 177 53 0 362 12:00 I1IDNIGHT 0 0 25 21 177 38 0 2b1 ~ ~~~ . '" ~ It 0'0 ~~A TABLE VrI V i2.1l , ~' ~ SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS USING BOYNTON BEACH GENERATION RATESfid ~ I 'JP UlI RATE USED FOR GUEST ROOltS (j~lD t SHARED PARKINS ANALYSIS - NEEKDAY II' JOB NU~BER: 4677.02 JOB NA~E: CATALINA CENTER ~ ---'" -. .I . DATE: PEAK DEltANI>: HOUR OF THE DAY 6:00 A.". 7:00 A.It. 8:00 A. It. 9:00 A.It. 10:00 A.,.. \ 11:00 A.Il. 12:00 NOON 1:00 P.". 2:00 P.". 3:00 P.,.. 4:00 P.I'\. 5:00 P.I'!. 6:00 P.". 7:00 P.I'I. 8:00 P.".___ 9:00 P.". 10:00 P./t. 11:00 P.I'!. 12:00 "IDNlSHT JUNE 30 I 1988 HOTEL , '" OFFICE RETAIL ~ANT HEALTH CLUB -~~~;~-~~~--;~;;~~~;~;--~~~;~~~~;-;~~~- TOTAL 112 732 83 41 177 126 74 1345 3 ,Al&~ --1f (,,;, o 279 o o 177 25 o 226 22 59 2 150 25 71 132 411o~ 4 115 25 37 404 I~' 307 74 637 8 97 25 ",. h'J 80 25 H ~ ---. ~~ ~ 968 ? 53 63 !\.~ 74 q~ .:vS' 'P , . '~,B~_, __....~..!.1:, 7 02 7b 826 50 62 69 74 1075 42 $61 74 1010 eo 63 58 Jt8~ Y--83 I~~K?, 106 S8 74 998 75 124 74 1053 : 83 74 1116 ------- - 3 , \ 83 I $5'7. 168 ~6q 177 37 447 126 74 3 ''75 234 113 o 1l(P3 --1'f (0 ; /d-[ 95 58 177 88 o 439 o o 42 177 63 0 302 )_ \-\~\O~ ~" t:' ~ 1tA-\ 'f,................' Kim/ey-Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive, West Palm Beach, FL 33407 · (30S) 84S-066Sl Raleigh. Durham. Charlotte. Nashville, Virginia Beach. Washington. Dallas. West Palm Beach. Tampa, Orlando. Fl. Lauderdale. Vera Beach. Ft Myers. Phoenix May 31, 1988 4677.01(07) Ms. Tambri Heydon City of Boynton Beach 120 N.E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Dear Ms. Heydon: We have analyzed the effect of trading off some office space for a health club facility at the Catalina Centre. The site plan as it exists provides 110 parking spaces for the office site. The proposed change with the health club facility provides 97 spaces. The parking requirements for the health club facility are as follows: TABLE 1 PARKING REQUIREMENTS # of Land Use Quantitv Rate # of Soaces % Reduction Soaces Squash Court 1,452 ft2 1:1,800 ft2 1 50% .5 Racquetball Court 1,763 ft2 1:1,800 ft2 1 50% .5 Health Club 21,393 ft2 1 :300 ft2 72 50% 36 Pool 2,700 ft2 1:30 ft2 90 100% 0 Tennis Court 14,400 ft2 1:1,500 ft2 10 50% 5 Office 33,338 ft2 1:300 ft2 J..!l... 0% J..!l... Total 286 154 Building client relationships since 1967 I I i/7,?ro;-;-,oro--,n,7, .u;@[J'= I I,JDLuiIiJU<5UOL'U 0 uu '1 , I Ms. Tambri Heydon -2- May 31, 1988 The nature and location of the health club suggests that many of the patrons of the club will be office employees, hotel guests, residents of Catalina Club and users of more than one use in the club. These factors permit a reduction in the parking provided. Based on discussions with Ocean Properties and knowledge of similar facilities, a 50 percent reduction can be expected in the the courts and health club to compensate for users already on site. The swimming pool is expected to generate demand exclusively from the other uses on site. Therefore, a 100 percent internal capture was applied to the pool. Applying the reduction factors, the proposed office and health club require 112 spaces for the office and 42 spaces for the health club and ancillary facilities. A total of 154 spaces are required. Under the shared parking conditions, spaces will be available from other uses on site. Table 2 shows the parking demand for the uses on the entire Catalina Centre site. The peak of the site is 1:00 p.m. with a total demand of 1,116 spaces. At the peak of the entire site, 1:00 p.m., the hotel will have 226 spaces (437-211 = 226) available to share. The restaurants and retail will require 41 spaces (725-684 = 41), leaving 185 available to share. The office/health -club will require 122 spaces, therefore, needing to share 25 spaces (122-97 = 25). A shared parking surplus of 160 spaces will exist on site (185-25 = 160). Since this surplus is greater than under previous conditions, with no health club, the buffers for all the remaining uses on site will be improved. The critical buffer previously had been the retail buffer. The retail buffer now calculates as: 160 surolus shared oarkinll 684 spaces provided + 41 required to meet code = 21.1% The buffers for the office and and health club will be as follows: Office/health club = 160 surolus soaces - 57 reauired to meet code 97 spaces provided + 57 required to meet code = ill = 154 67% I l" I / ("1/""7.-:J '7 ,j" I L\:. U [Jf;f)!Kfli!lo L;::;)@{J'[Jfj Ms. Tambri Heydon -3- May 31, 1988 Given the peaking characteristics of the proposed uses and their ability to share from surrounding uses, the parking proposed for the office/health club will have sufficient buffers as required by the City of Boynton Beach. Very truly yours, KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ~~~,~~ Steven G. Godfrey, P.E. Vice President SGG/SOR:jsl 467701L5-31.eor / jel i I I I I I I I I \ ) U> .... - c ox z ~ - c ox .... ~ U> 5 c .... '"' !i - ('J~ ~ j!i coU; <!~ f-U; ~ ~ ~ ~ c "- .,. ~ ~ en >- ""' ... ~ ~ '" c -....- ~~ii !~5 ! ~ ., ~ e:i .- "-'"'II!! ~I~ ~...... a5~~ ... ...."", :!~ "" .... c c> .... ~ ,. ~ - "'" ~ !i .... s; C> 8.... ox .... .... ti ~ .... ox .... ~ .... I~ "" ~ .... en ..... ox sE a: - U> !!!!l CD c> a! ... Si .... ~ '" ..... ox i !::! ... ;;; ... .... - ~ .... ....N ... :>: ~ ~ -.... ~... ! ..- ~ ""' In .... N ... .... ... ~ a: .... Si lj N ....- :=- u.. u.. c::> Q ~ ~ ... ~ ~ ... .... .... C> ... Ii'> N ... :; ... ,... ... ... 'it ..- .... ... ~ ~ 0- ... N <::> C> ~ ... ~ C> <::> M C> <::> ,.., ..: c C> <::> ~ C> .. C> .... ,.., It> N ~ ... C> <::> M .... ... It"J ~ ..: c ~' ... <::> "'" .... <::> o ... Ii'> .... ... 0- o C> M ... - ~ - .... ..: c o o a; :; ... C> o ... ~ a <::> <::> M cD Ii'> o ,.., ... ~ ..: c C> <::> r; ~ ... o ... - .... :2 "'" ... ... ... ... ~ .... .... <::> ~ - ..: c ... C> ~ ~ C> o M Ii'> N ;:;; .... ... ... ':2 ,.., ..... o ~ ..: c o <::> ... :: ... c> ... ... .... - ... ~ .... o .... = ..... ..... ... ~ !i ~ ... <::> 5 <::> ... ~ <:> ... ... .... .... .... .... C> o ... ... N ... Ii'> ..... .... .... ... ~ ..: ..:. g ... ... ... ~ C> C> ... $ "... ... ... o M ... ... ..., c> ... ; ..: ..:. ... o N g ~ C> ... ... ..... ... a o C> ... .... ... ... ... ~ ... ~ ..: ..:. C> o ,;; fC ... C> C> ... N - ... - ,.., ... ,.., ... ~ C> ... ... o ... = ~ ... ... ~ ... ~ ... ... o .... ... ... II> ..., ... .... ;g :;:l ..: ... C> ~ ... ..: .: ... ..:. c> '0 o c> .n ~ ... ~ - C> c> .... ... ... ... Ii'> ... .... c> ... .... ~ ,.., ~ o ... N o ... ~ ... ... N ... N .. ..... ... ... o ... .... ~ ... ~ C> ... ..: ..: o ~ ... ... ... o o ... ..., N CO> ~ ... ... ~ CO> :2 ... ... ~ G- o C> a; ... ~ <::> <::> ... N N ... N ... ... ~ ... ~ <::> c> ..... ,.., c> ... :: = ,.., ... ... :; ... :; ..... :; ... <::> c> o C> o - N ... N - N ... .... ..... It"J :; N ,.., ... ... ... ... ,.., ,.., o ... ..: ..:. o o r; ..: "- o <::> ~ ..: G- o C> ... - :>: CD ~ ;: o o ~ .., .T fXO[]fJfJD@';!7o [}fl@[l[]D Kim/ey-Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive. West Palm Beach, FL3340"I.(407) 845-~ Raleigh, Charlotte, Nashville, Virginia Beach, Washington, Dallas. Phoenix. West Palm Beach. Tampa, Orlando. Fl Lauderdale, Vera Beech. Fl Myers May 16, 1988 Revised June 22, 1988 4677 .OH07)P87-55 Ms. Tambri Heyden Ci ty of Boynton Beach 120 NE Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 Re: Catalina Center/Study Revised to Include Gerulaitis Resort Dear Ms. Heyden: As requested, we have revised the parking analysis for Catalina Center located in Boynton Beach, Florida. This revision is a comprehensive document which includes a reduction of the amount of office square footage and the addition of a Gerulaitis Resort (health club/tennis center) along with all previous changes to the site. As a result of the difference in parking peak characteristics of the exchanged land uses (office to health dub), the demand at the Catalina Center peaks at 1:00 PM and 8:00 PM. These peaking characteristics are reflected in the tables and buffer calculations. The analysis was based on the City of Boynton Beach parking code; parking generation rates recommended by the Urban Land Institute (ULI), ULI-the Urban Land Institute Shared Parking" 1983; parking generation rates recommended by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Parking, Generation--An Interim Report, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1985; and the shared parking recommendations of the Urban Land Institute, ULI-- The Urban Land Institute Shared Parking" 1983. All rates used in this analysis represent peak season demand. Differences in seasonal peaks which exist among the land uses proposed were conservatively ignored. Shared parking is an integral part of the Catalina Center analysis. Shared parking is defined as parking space which can be used by two or more land uses without conflict or encroachment. In order for shared parking to be utilized, the peak accumulation of parked vehicles generated by different but adjacent land uses must not be concurrent. Building client relationships since 1967 . ;; ---- --~-------; 'I I' ,roo '7 ""'0:JJ i u\c.DCfJD!J@r;Jo~~@[](JfJ , i ~ Ms. Tambri Heyden -2- May 16, 1988 Revised June 22, 1988 Catalina Center will consist of four land uses: office, retail, health club with ancillary facilities, and hotel with restaurant, lounge, and conference facilities contained within the hotel. Considering the land use mix, maximum parking accumulation will occur on weekdays. An analysis has been made of the northern parcel, which contains 144,620 square feet of retail space with the proposed revision of the outparcel reduction from 6,000 square feet to 4,295 square feet, and the southern parcel, which contains 33,338 square feet of office, 24,608 square feet of health facilities, and a 166-room hotel with its auxiliary uses including 18 suites. The north and south parcels were analyzed separately and combined. The analysis was based on information provided by Ocean Properties, on the January 21, 1985, site plan of the total development, the August 27, 1986, site plan of the retail parcel, information provided verbally in August, 1987, the outparcel site plan of December 28, 1987, and supplemental information provided in 1988. Our analysis demonstrates that the proposed parking will be sufficient to accommodate the parking demands of both the northern and southern parcels, whether they are considered individually or together. Northern Parcel ULI and ITE are the most widely recognized sources of parking generation data. For a retail development of the size of Catalina Center, ULI recommends a rate of four spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area. This would indicate that 579 spaces should be provided for the northern parcel. ITE recommends a weekday parking rate for peak season (Thanksgiving to Christmas) of 3.25 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross leasable area, which would require Catalina Center to provide 470 spaces for the retail parcel. A total of 688 spaces are proposed for the retail parcel, 109 08.8%) more than required by ULI rates and 218 (46.4%) more than indicated by the ITE peak season rates. The Boynton Beach parking code, for retail use, is generalized to accommodate all shopping center sizes. The code requires five parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area. According to ULI, this is a rate appropriately applied to retail developments greater than 600,000 square feet, over four times the size of the proposed Catalina Center retail parcel. Under the Boynton Beach parking code,- the Catalina Center retail parcel would be required to provide 724 parking spaces. l_~_____ ) 4677 .OH07)P87-55 . n I ; "V7" 0 'Ln f.lL \~CCDJ!J@\V7o J-t}@[]'[Jf). , u ) Ms. Tambri Heyden -3- May 16, 1988 Revised June 22, 1988 Southern Parcel Given the hotel/office/health club/restaurant land use mix proposed for the southern parcel, it is reasonable to assume that shared parking will occur within the parcel itself. Analysis of the site plan shows that numerous parking spaces within the parcel are convenient to the four land uses which will allow shared parking to occur. The nature and location of the health club suggests that many of the patrons of the club will be office employees, hotel guests, residents of the adjacent Catalina Club and users of more than one use in the club. These factors permi t a reduction in the parking provided. Based on discussions with Ocean Properties and knowledge of similar facilities, a 50 percent reduction can be expected in the courts and health club to compensate for users already on site. The swimming pool and outdoor courts are expected to ~enerate demands entirely from the other uses on site. Therefore, a 100 percent Internal capture was applied to these uses. Table 1 (attached) outlines the parking demand which can be expected for the southern parcel using ITE and/or ULI generation rates. As shown in Table 1, wi thout considering shared parking, 571 parking spaces are required under ITE/ULI recommendations. Compared to ITE and ULI, the Boynton Beach parking code is more conservative for office, hotel, and restaurant/lounge land use, but requires fewer spaces for conference facilities. Parking demand for the southern parcel generated using the Boynton Beach parking code is shown in Table 2 (attached). As shown, without considering shared parking, the Boynton Beach code would require 653 spaces to be provided for the southern parcel. As previously stated, the physical layout and mixed-use character of the southern parcel lends itself to shared parking. Table 3 (attached) shows the peak parking demand projected for Catalina Center's southern parcel using the generation rates recommended by ITE/ULI, and considering the shared parking recommendations of ULI. As seen, 482 spaces are required to meet the peak parking demand, well below the 592 proposed for the site. Table 4 (attached) shows the peak parking demand for the southern parcel using Boynton Beach rates for parking generation, and ULI recommendations for shared parking. As seen, under these criteria, peak parking demand will be 533 spaces. The 592 spaces proposed represents a projected surplus of 70 spaces. Based on the above analysis, parking proposed for the southern parcel of Catalina Center should prove sufficient to handling its parking needs. 4677 .OH07)P87-55 . ,. Ii : 'I r/70 '7 .'"J' I I 1_,,:c.D{Ji]D!J@I'!oLrJ@(1fJf) It Ms. Tambri Heyden -4- May 16, 1988 Revised June 22, 1988 Total Development Given the mixed-use character and physical layout of the Catalina Center site, the most reasonable approach for analysis of the total development is through use of ULI shared parking recommendations. A total of 1,280 parking spaces are proposed for the development. Projected parking demand for the total site using ULI's shared parking recommendations are shown in Tables 5, 6, and 7 (attached). Tables 5 and 6 use the ITE/ULI parking generation rates applied in Table 2 for land uses other than retail. Table 5 uses the peak season rates for retail generation, and Table 6 uses ULI rates for retail generation. Based on discussions with Boynton Beach City staff, as the various hotel components are being evaluated separately, the ULI rate of 1.0 space per hotel room and the ULI residential rate of 1.6 for the hotel suites is the appropriate parking generation rate to be used in the analysis. Table 7 reflects this rate for the hotel room and suite generation and Boynton Beach code rates for all other uses. As shown, considering shared parking, the number of parking spaces recommended for Catalina Center ranges from 885 to 1,117 depending on the generation rate selected. It should be noted that in all the above scenarios, except where the Boynton codes are applied to each land use, sufficient parking space is provided on si te even without considering shared parking. For the remainder of this analysis, the more conservative Boynton Beach rates reflected in Table 7 will be applied. The City of Boynton Beach requires that a 10% buffer be provided to ensure that a sufficient number of parking spaces are available at the time of peak use. Based on consultation with City of Boynton Beach staff, and analysis of the layout of the total site plan, it will be conservatively assumed that the retail and the office uses share only from the available hotel parking of 438 spaces. The restaurant outparcel may share from the hotel or retail. Also, due to the layout of the site which is not especially conducive to shared parking between the retail or restaurant and office uses, buffer calculations have been performed separately for retail, restaurant outparcel and office uses. By Boynton Beach code, the buffer is calculated as follows: B ff _ Surplus Shared Parking u er - On-Site + Shared Parking Provided 4677 .OH07)P87-55 " ~ r--- ------======:---\ I, 1~/7Fr;;;.:: r; Ii {'-UJ i I ! L<~LL'1/Ltll1i)~ljo u1l2)!7[JfJ I, Ms. Tambri Heyden -5- May 16, 1988 Revised June 22, 1988 The peak hours of parking demand for the site are 1:00 PM and 8:00 PM as shown on Table 7. At 8:00, the hotel usage will require 359 spaces of the 438 provided leaving 79 spaces available for sharing with the other uses. Neither the retail or the office/health club will require any shared parking at this time. The office/health club will use 45 of its 95 spaces, leaving 50 available spaces. The Marie Callenders restaurant outparcel will need to share 24 spaces to accommodate its parking code requirement of 83. A surplus of spaces of 79 - 24 = 55 spaces therefore exists for the hotel site, leaving a surplus of 55 + 50 = 105 spaces for the office/health club. The buffer for the office/health club (to three significant figures) is therefore: 9;~ 54 x 100 = 70.59q As calculated above, during the peak hours of parking demand, 79 spaces of the 438 provided for the hotel are available for shared parking. Also as shown, 24 spaces will be shared at this time by the Marie Callenders outparcelleaving 79 - 24 = 55 spaces available to be shared with the retail. The peak demand of 630 spaces for the retail has been met by the 688 spaces provided. This leaves a surplus of 688 - 630 = 58 spaces on the retail site. Overall, the surplus for the retail portion is 58 + 55 = 113. The buffer for the retail (to three significant figures) is therefore: 113 688 + 36 x 100 = 15.6% During the peak hour of parking demand of the site, the demand for spaces at the Marie Callenders restaurant outparcel will be 100% of its total requirements (83 spaces). Since 59 spaces have been provided for the restaurant, 24 spaces will need to be shared with the hotel. The buffer for the restaurant outparcel is: 113 59 + 24 = 136.1% At 1 :00 PM the buffers are also met. The hotel will require 234 of the 438 spaces provided leaving 204 to share with the other uses on site. The office/health club will require 120 spaces, therefore needing to share 25 spaces from the hotel. The retail center will demand 724 spaces, therefore needing to share 36 spaces from the hotel. Marie Callenders will not require any sharing at 1 :00 PM. Considering these demands, the surplus shared parking is 204 - 25 - 36 = 143 spaces. The buffer for the office/health club is: 143 95 + 54 x 100 = 96.0% 4677 .OH07)P87-55 ,,------1 'I i'V7E!~n=n", iLf7-[J'= I !: u~L'L/IILjLj(sr;/O!J1)(Q) rLfJ...J I '\ Ms. Tambri Heyden -6- May 16, 1988 Revised June 22, 1988 The buffer for the retail is: 143 688+36 x100=19.8% The buffer for Marie Callenders is: 5J? 24 x 100 = 172% Although the site demand is equal at 1:00 PM and 8:00 PM, the buffers are greater at 1:00 since the surplus comes from the hotel. In other words, the entire surplus is available for the health club and retail. It is seen that using the Boynton Beach generation rates, both the office and retail parcels meet the Boynton Beach buffer requirement of 10%. Based on the above analysis, the 1,280 spaces provided for the total development should prove sufficient in handling the parking demands of the development. If you have any questions regarding this analysis, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, C~~~~~ATE5' INC. ( ~sportation Engineer for Steven G. Godfrey, P.E. Vice President JFB:SGG:SOR/mec Attachments \- ) 4677 .OH07)P87-55 r I I Cl Z < ~ UJ Cl ~ (j Z ~ - ~ ~ = = < < ~ ~ Cl Q Z ~ < < UJ UJ ::c ...J V') V') cQ :J 0 < Cl z .... z .. < V') ...J UJ I- ..J < uJ = U _ = ...J < :J ~ ...... Z ~ = - UJ :c .... :J o V') - l "O~ V CIl '- V .... U g.CO VV') P::: c: o .- +" *g "0 V P::: '+-l ~CIl o U _CO ..... V') ~ -.0 11"\ 00 ~ * * * a a a 11"\ 11"\ It''\ o 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I * * * * * * * * * a 000 a 0 a 0 a 11"\ a 0 ..... ..... ~ N ..... - a a 00 ~ N 0 ~ 00 00 ~ ~ - ~ N N 11"\ 11"\ ~ ..... ..... v u '- ::l o V') - ....l :::> * * * * c: c: o 0 +" +" c: c: >- >- o 0 CO CO uJ (-0 - * * c: o +" c: >- o CO * * * * c: c: o 0 +" +" c: c: >- >- o 0 CO CO ..: '+-4 0- . CIl E s.. V +" CO P::: ~ CO V c.. . .... '+-4 . 0- +" CIl "": o aog'a. o a a 0 a u o a 00 00 0 11"\ U ..... l"'\ ..... - l"'\ ..... 0 ------- 11"\ a a 0 0 a a . ... . N~......__t..._4~..... . . +" . +" *': ...... '+-of 0"' "": 0- CIl 0"' CIl CIl .... .... CIl c: V +"' c: - . . . +" .... .... .... .... '+-4 . . . 0"' 0"' 0"' CIl CIl CIl 00 l"'\ N l"'\ ~ 11"\ l"'\ l"'\ ~ . .... .... . 0"' CIl . . CIl ~ ~ E . . 0 0"' 0"' 0 CIl CIl s.. .. ... l"'\ ..... ..... ..... N ~ l"'\ N ...... l"'\ -.0 ~ a a 00 a a ~ ~ ~ ..... v CIl ::> "0 c: CO ..J .... .0 s.. ::l ::l ..... 0 U U v .c U =: :;:: CO .... V o :c .... s.. ::l o U +" '- ::l o U .c CIl <'d ::l 0"' V') ..... ...... CO ..0 .... V CIl ::l ......... 0"' ..... c: v U 0 c: .... CO 0 V 0 P::: c.. (-0 :J: * * * :3 :3 u.l u.l u.l ::> :::> t: t: t: .... .... .... CO c: CI) ::l CIl - - -.0 ~ . N ..... CIl CIl CIl +" +" .... .... CO <'d c: CI) CI) ::l CIl CIl 00 0 ,..,. ...... ~ a N CIl E o o P::: CIl ~ .... .... c: c: CO co s.. '- ::l ::l ..... co co CI) .... .... .... CIl CIl o v CI) :c P::: P::: .- ::l V') :3 :J .... .... CO co .... CI) CI) co CIl CIl CI) - - CIl ~ ~ - N N It''\ . CIl .... CO V CIl It''\ N N - ..... v U s.. CO 0. .... ::l o - E o o ~ CI) gf ~ .... c: .... ::l CI) o V ....l ::;; CIl .... CO CI) CIl -.0 ~ N ..... ~ It''\ . CIl +" c: co s.. ::l CO .... CIl CI) '- '- o .... Q) +" CO '- u.l l- - v .c .... .c .... .~ "0 Q) \I) ::l \I) .... c: CO '- ::l CO .... CIl Q) '- - Q) +" o .c '- o .... \I) c: o .... .... a. E ::l \I) CIl CO :3 ::> * lrr.,:. ~ I, I' ~ ' i 2! I a i I ~I I I @j I i! ~ I IlliJ I~ I ~ r-- I ~ I I ! @ II 2 ~~ ~ v V) 0 0 ~ t- V N ~ Ir\ Ir\ Ir\ -.0 0 ~ rt'I .::t- "" ..... u ..... rt'I . . 00 rt'I Cl'\ rt'I 00 r-.. Ir\ I ~ g.eO - - -.0 I Ie::; \~ VV') oC::! a:: i ~~ l:...'::l '-== c ?? "* ?? *- *- "* ?? "* *- *- ?? ?? 0 ..... ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *-g Ir\ Ir\ Ir\ 0 0 - - "0 ~ V Z a:: - 0 ~ 0: Z < -~ N N - ..... 0 0 Ir\ ~ 0 -.0 rt'I .::t- < c.. ..... "- Cl'\ - 00 rt'I Cl'\ "" 00 r-.. :! o u ..... - 0 _eO ~ .... ~ V') ~ < Z :J: < - V') V l.L. ~ 0 ~ tj 0: eO < Z a:: ...; . . . .... c.. .. "0 . ~ ~ ~ V') C 0" .... ~ . ~ 0 . LIJ eO V) 0" 0'" ~ 0" . ~ Z l- E 0 ~ V) V) V) E V) V) V) < < 0 ~ 0" ~ ~ ~ N Q) 0 0 0 V) 0 0 eO eO eO V) 0: Cl .. 0" 0 0 0 0 Q) Q) Q) ~ LIJ LIJ ..... V) 00 00 0 Ir\ t- V) V) V) eO I/) LIJ - 0 - ..... rt'I - - ~ Q) ....l ::;) 0 C rt'I 0 - - - - Ir\ .;: Ir\ Ir\ Ir\ V) cO N N . ..... "" rt'I 0 0 0 0 N ::l N .::t- O .Yo < 0 t- . - . . . . . - - - - - I- Z U eO "" - - - - - - N - ..... - - < ~ c.. ....I Z ....I - ~ u.I 0: U . . . . . . V) 0: < ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E V) V) V) V) V) c.. .... .... .... .... .... .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ < ~ . . . . . . 0 ..... eO eO eO eO c.. :c .v) 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0 C V Q) V V U c V) V) V) V) V) V) t- ::l V) V) V) V) Z V 0: < ~ 00 rt'I N rt'I 0 0 00 00 Ir\ 0 "- ~ LIJ c rt'I Cl'\ Ir\ -.0 0 0 .:r - N Cl'\ 0 Cl'\ u.I - rt'I rt'I .::t- r-.. "- .:r - N N N :J: cQ .. .. Z rt'I - - - N .:r I- rt'I N - ::> 0 0 l- I/) Z >- 0 - - CC Q) u ~ L.o Q) L.o eO ::l 0. V) 0 ~ ::> u V) ::l E ~ 0 "0 ~ V) 0 .0 L.o - L.o E V) - C ::l ::l - ::l Q) ~ ~ 0 eO - 0 eO 0 0 ~ C c a:: ..... .....l U U .0 U 0 ::l eO eO ~ a:: V') L.o L.o 00 V .c .c V V) Q) ::l ::l C u .:!:: V) ::l ..... - - 00 eO eO ..... eO 0" - C V V C ~ ~ ~ ..... V .... eO ::l U 0 C ~ ~ ::l V) V) .... Q) 0" eO 0 V 0 0 0 V Q) Q) 0 :c V') 0::: c.. I- :c :c ...J a:: a:: ~ ! i !II ~ ~ ... ~ ~ ;:;; _:::I - "" ...~ -' :IC ... ... c "" ... li W ~ ~ -' ... ..... "" c ~ ,., "" ... :z: 13 en >- c "" ~ ~ ffi ... ,., ... ..... en C -.... z en 0_ >- 'a ::;!::::~ ....C c ... ..... ! :..: .. ~ ffi .. G..I!W e3ii~ !...... ... ... .., ... -' - c ... ... .... ... ... -' ... i ~~ ... - "" ... ~ ..... "" ..... ~ ..... ... ... e: .... .... ~ ... ..... ... c "" ..... ... W'" a ~ ... en lIi! ~l:: i!- ... en li gin::; -' ... :Ie ... -' c ~ _0 5.... I ... en ..... "" -' 0 ; - ..... "" ..... .... ~... LA- LA- ... .:;; ~ :IC ... ... ~ ~ i !i! - LA- ... !! ~ .... N <:> ~ ... .... e: o ... .... .: c ... o .4 .... o .... o ~ ... ~ e: ... !::; .: c ... ... .... ... .... .... ... .... ~ ~ e: .... ... .... .... .: c ... o a; ::0 .... ... ::!: ~ .... 0- e: .... ... .... .... .: c ... "" .;: ... on .... ~ ~ o ... e: ~ "" .... ... .: c 8 .;; 0- ... .... ~ .... .... .... ... e: ~ ... .... ... .: c ... "" .... .... .... ... ::!: ... .... .... on e: .... .... ... .... ... ~ w ... "" ~ .... ~ ID ::!: .... .... .... .... e: .... .... ... .... .... .: ..: ... "" on ~ ... .. ... ... .... ... e: ... .... ... CD .: ..: ... ... N ... ... .... ! .... ... .... ... e: ... .... ... .... ... .: ..: ... "" .:; ... ... .... ... ... ... .... ... ... ... .... ~ "" ... ... .: ..: ... <:> .:; ~ ... ... ::!: .... .... ... ::: .... .... .... .... <:> 0- .... .: ..: <:> ... .;; :;: ... ID ::!: ... ... ... ~ .... .... .... ... <:> ~ .: ..: ... ... .4 ... on ... ! ... ... .... ~ ... .... <:> .... ... ... .: ..: ... "" ,::: ... ... ... ... ::!: .... ... 0- ~ t, .... ... .... o .... .: ..: ... "" a; .... ID ... ID ::!: ... ... ... :! ... .... o .... ... .... .: ~ ... "" .;: .... ::it 0- on .... ... ... .... ... ... ... o ID .... .... .... ... .... ... .... ..... ..... ... ... .... .... e: ~ on ... .... .... .... .... o ... ... .... ... ... .: ..: ... <:> .;; ... :z: ... i ;: C> C> ~ .: ..: <:> ... . "" ~ en :::I "" =:1 UI UI ..... "" ... co: <El ....~ "" "" co: a. ..... UI <.> a:: co: a.. - "" !l!! .... :::I "" en - ~ .... co: "" UI - UI CD :c <.> co: ... ... - "" . i i "" ... w "" ... .... :z ... <.> en co: _ N_ en 0_ ::;,..:;2 I........ .... co: .. <.> CD ~ i ffi .. a..illl!! ~.~ ~...... ~~~ ;a!~ .... ... o .... !i~ :5! .... ... .... o = ... <.> :z ... IX .... . <.> ... ... ~~ a ~ .... en ~ !iN ON "" .... ~ m ~ N N ... !i ... w i ... .... =..., .... <.> = .... .... co: ... = .... ..., ~... !!5 co: .... en ... a:: ....0 ~ ... IX ... N ~:: ... ... ... A ~ 15 "'" ~ UI a.. > co: "'" ... = .... ... o ~ = ... .... N ... on N N N ~ o 00 ..., .: c 00 ... ~ ... lC3 ..,. on N ! ~ N ... N N .: c 00 ... ;.:. .... j!; .... ..., on N .. .. ~ .. ..,. - .... .: c 00 00 m N ~ .. .... on N N N ~ ... o .. ~ .: c ... 00 0.: .... .. ..., .. .... on N .... .... ~ :: 00 ~ .: c 00 00 ~ In ~ .. .... ~ .... .... ~ on N o N .: c 00 00 .. -'= .. .... ..., .... :: ~ N .. 00 - o :z I 00 ..,. ~ .... 00 .. .. .... ... ... :: ~ ... In 00 co .: ..: 00 00 .. 00 .. .. .... ... .... .... .... ~ 00 In 00 .... ~ .: ..: - 00 N ..., .... ..., .. .... .... ... .... .... ~ 00 on 00 .. ..,. .: ..: 00 00 ,::; o .... ..., .. .... ..., .... .... .... ... N N .. ..,. .... ... .: ..: 00 00 ;;. ..., .. .. .. .... ... ... ..., ..., .... ..., ... .... ..,. ..., In .: ..: 00 ... .;; ... ... .. - .... ..., !! .... to'> In .... ... .... N .: ..: .0 ... ~ .. .... .. .. .... ... ~ ~ .... ..., ..., ... .0 ... .: ..: 00 <:> ;.:. .... N on .. .... .... N !: .... ..., ..., ... o "" .: ..: 00 ... m ..., ~ .. .... ... ~ ~ N .... ..., ..., ... .0 ..., .: ..: .0 ... 0.: .... .... ... .... ~ .. .. ..., .... ..., ... 00 ~ ... ... ..., ... N N N N N N .... N ~ ~ In .... "" In N .. o .0 00 ..., .0 00 .: ..: .0 ... ~ .: ..: ... ... .... = CD i ;;: ..,. ... ~ :: > en en -.... .... en _ -' >- <Z: ... -' ... ::!~...... <Z: _ !ii::: - -' ""' => a:: <Z: ~ CL~ c::a => .... !Ii: x: << en _ .... ... en .... en => c::a a:: z Q <Z: .... -' en ... ~!i! <Z: _ a:: c:> ~~ -..... >- <Z: c::a "" 1M a:: ..... - Z ..... U ca <Z: _.... Z eno_ ~....:~ <Z: .... _ Z.... C C_U ca :z "" .. :i ffi .. CL:i!~ ~i!ti !Ii...... :Z:ClCl en ~ ... -' - C ... _ 0 CO - - I! -' ..... i .... ii ..... a:: .... . u l1I~ is -' - - UI ..... ... I~ ... - UI .... ~ ~:::; -' U x: - -' ... ..... :z: gg ~ .,.; .... ~ .... ..... - C c::a _0 ~'" !!5 ... - UI .... ... -' 0 -.... ... ... - .... CI: ..... ... ~... .... .... CO GO ~ -= .... Q llf ~ >- <Z: "" !i! >- ~ !i CO :z: ... N ... ~ .... .... ~ ... ... .... .: c ... ... ~ ... ... .... ... It') ... ~ ~ CD ... ~ .: c o ... ,:: ~ ... .... ~ ~ ~ ... on CD .... It') .: c ... ... .;; ... lR ... ... ~ .... ... ~ It') .... ~ .... .... .: c ... ... .;: ... .... .... ... :!; ~ ... ... ~ ~ ... .... ... ... ... .: c ... ... C; ... .... .... ... - ... .... .... .... ~ ~ ... ... ... ... ... .: c ... o - ... C; ... - ... ... ... ..... ~ It') .-. .... ..... - It') .... !i Cl Z o ... ~ ... jg ... :!; ... '" ... It') ~ ..... ... o .... - It') .... .: ..: o ... o Z ... :!; .... ... .... .... ~ o ... .... ..... - c; .: ..: -0 ... N ~ ... - .... ... .... .... ~ o ... .... ... ... .... .... .: ..: o o ,:; ... ... .... CD ... CD ... ~ .... .... ..... .... ... o - ... .... .: ..: g :; ... It CD :!; ... '" .... ~ .... ... It') .., .... .., ... .., .: ..: o C> on !;i - :!; CD .... ... .... .... ... It') - .., CD .., ~ .: ..: ... C> ... CD <I ... :!; .... .... .., ... .... .., ... .., ... :;: .... .: ..: .,. o ,:: on gg CD :!; .... .... ~ .... ... o It') ... o ... .... .: ..: ... o .;; ... .... .... CD ... .... .... CD ~ .... ... o .., .... ... .... .... -= ..: o o .;: .., ;;t; ... .., .... It') ;:I; ... .... C> ... CD ... CD .., ... It') .... .... .... .... .... .... ... .... ~ ~ It') ... .... .... It') ... C> ~ o ~ .... C> o .: <>- o C> ~ .: ..: C> C> >- x: ... i ;: o C> N - Cl< ~~ ;:cn~ - ... ... eft ... -'~c .... .... Cl< :!!:~... c ... ~S >:<5 "" c Co.~ ::5:::> ~;::! ili:!!: ... "" ... ~ :::> "'" "" . "'" c .... .... eft "" ~':!! c ... "" C> i """ ... !III "" ... ... . ... ... U> C -.... u>o- ::;":a! c....... . -4IIC C ... ... ... . w .. ~ ei .. Co.l!lII! ::5i!~ ~........ ::== U> .... .... .... i m ~ ..... ..... ~ :::> .... ... ... G: "'" a!S ... - = - - ~: =- ae ... ill ~ ... . ... ... -411 ..... a ~ -' eft ... ae I~ ... ... ~ !!l::; ... ... ; ... 0 _It> !i C - en ... a: ... ... -.... C It> - ... "" ... ... ~CD .... .... = A - l5 "" ~ ~ i ... :: - ... = ~ ~ ... N co ~ .... .... ~ o o ..... .: c co co .:a CD ... ..... co ~ ~ ~ -411 ... ~ .: c co co ,:.: ... ~ ... .... ~ ~ - ~ ... ... ~ ... It> .: c o co ,;; ... co -411 CD :!; ~ .... ... ~ In ... ... ..... .... .... .: c o co .;: CD ... .... CD :!; ~ o CD ~ ~ ... ... ,.., ... CD .: c co co o ... l!il CD :!; ... ... ... -411 ~ ~ ... co It> ... CD .: c o co ... ;: CD ... ~ :;; ~ In ... .... jj!if In .... ~ ~ o C> ~ .... '#. CD ... ... .... ... It> ~ It> ... ... .... .... In .... .: ..: o C> .... :: CD ... .... ... .... .... ~ o ... ~ - CD .: ..: -0 o N .... .... ... CD :!; .... ... .... -411 ~ o ... o lR .... .... .: ..: o C> ,:; i CD :!; CD ... llil -411 .... In .... ... C> It> ... -411 .: ..: o C> ... -411 .... CD CD :!; ,.., In cg' .... ,.., In ,.., .... In ... ... ... .: ..: o C> Iii ~ ... CD :!; CD -411 ... ~ .... ... .... ... In .... ... ~ .: ..: ... C> .:a It> '#. CD :!; -411 .... ... ~ .... ... o .... .... in -411 .: ..: o C> .... ... g! CD ... -411 .... l2 .... ... o .... ~ -411 .: ..: o <:> ,;; In ... CD CD ... -411 .... :! .... ... o In ,.., In ,.., "" .: Co. ... o .;: CD .... It> ... ~ ... .... ..... ... .... o C> CD -411 ,.., .... CD ... .... .... .... ~ .... .... -411 "" ~ ~ In ... In ... .... .... .... ~ In .... o ..... o o .: ..: ... <:> o ... :: ... i ;:: .: ..: 8 o <:> ..... i 'g .- ~ ~ ... ~ CD ~ ~ S - :S i f ; ~ ... ... - ~ $ c>- -~ ~ ~ 0 - ~ - - ... ... CD - - - .-.... Gl- ... "'" 0 - ... ... ... ';:; ... ... .... .... ... .- .- I ... ... .... ... ..... .- ..... .- .... I ~;!. <> 0 p; .... .... .... .... .... .... , , \ \ 'Q \ . ~ . G1 , . l i . , ... ... S '2 ~ I '2 S ; ... ~ I .... S ... $ ~ ~ ~ ~ \,... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ..... - , ... a::: . - ~ . , ,'" - , ~ , tA a::: , I ~ .- .... ~ \ ... ~ $ ~ .... I ~ ~ ~ $ ! ..... ..... ':::. $ ~ ~ ... - - I ... ~ ~ ;: - - - , IS ~$ I ':::. - I l~ , I I tA I -~ \ 'I \ 0- e~ I ... ';:; .... l=? l=? l=? ~ ~ - ",tD I c>- O- ~ c>- O"> i~ ". ". ~ c>- ~ ~ - - - ... ~l=? - - - ::\1: is ~ 7-.... i ....~~ _"'W .... ~ ~ .r> ~ ... ~'Cj;';i ~ 5::- $ .... ... or ~ 5::- ~ 0 ..... Of> ~':. i~ 0 .... .... ... ':::. It'> S!5 l ~ .... '" i ~ .... t:> .... ~ ... t:> ... S ... ~ ... ... ... '2 .... .,. t:> ~ ~ ... ~ <> S ... ~ :;; $ ... ... ... ...'" lS'> '2 ..... ..... .... -.... - , 4.... - ~ ... ... ... 0"> .... t:> - - ~ .... ..D .... .... i - .... ~ .... ~ t:P It'> "".... .... ~ ..... "'" - ~ ~ - ",,- - - - ~ ~ -- ; i ... ... c::> I - ~...~ ~ ",0- ~,..::- ~ 1':i:S -"" .... ~ ,i ,i ~ ~ .i .i , ,i .i ~ ,i .i .i ~ ~ ~ ... i .i .i ,i .i .;:. .;:. ... ... ... - ~ .;:. .;:. ... ... ... "" - ... ... ... ... ... ... g Q g Q ~~ .. - -t:> g g C g ~ c <:: ~ t:> t:> ~ t:> ~ t:> ;;. E ......'!l! ~ g t:> g <:> 0 "'" <:> - on :.; .;,; ~ ;:. ;; .... - - ~~~ :.; ;,;, ;;. E ;:. - .... !i~$ Uj ~ , ..... - - - ~ ~ ~........ .". ---.---- ------------ . to- / Kim/ey-Horn and AssociatesJ Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive, West Palm Beach, FL 33407 . (305) 845-0665 Raleigh. Durham. Charlotte. Nashville. Virginia Beach. Washington. Dallas, West Palm Beach, Tampa. Orlando, Ft lauderdale. Vero Beach, Ft Myers. Phoenix May 31, 1988 4677.01(07) Ms. Tambri Heydon City of Boynton Beach 120 N.E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Dear Ms. Heydon: We have analyzed the effect of trading off some office space for a health club facility at the Catalina Centre. The site plan as it exists provides 110 parking spaces for the office site. The proposed change with the "health club facility provides 97 spaces. The parking requirements for the health club facility are as follows: TABLE 1 PARKING REQUIREMENTS # of Land Use Ouantitv Rate # of SDaces % Reduction SDaces Squash Court 1,452 ft2 1:1,800 ft2 1 50% .5 Racquetball Court 1,763 ft2 1:1,800 ft2 I 50% .5 Health Club 21,393 ft2 1:300 ft2 72 50% 36 Pool 2,700 ft2 1:30 ft2 90 100% 0 Tennis Court 14,400 ft2 1:1,500 ft2 10 50% 5 Office 33,338 ft2 1:300 ft2 Jl.L 0% Jl.L Total 286 154 Building client relationships since 1967 ./ wf}UfJDO@WofX}@flfJD \ ( I Ms. Tambri Heydon -2- May 31, 1988 1 I ! The nature and location of the health club suggests that many of the patrons of the club will be office employees, hotel guests, residents of Catalina Club and users of more than one use in the club. These factors permit a reduction in the parking provided. Based on discussions with Ocean Properties and knowledge of similar facilities, a 50 percent reduction can be expected in the the courts and health club to compensate for users already on site. The swimming pool is expected to generate demand exclusively from the other uses on site. Therefore, a 100 percent internal capture was applied to the pool. Applying the reduction factors, the proposed office and health club require 112 spaces for the office and 42 spaces for the health club and ancillary facilities. A total of 154 spaces are required. Under the shared parking conditions, spaces will be available from other uses on site. Table 2 shows the parking demand for the uses on the entire Catalina Centre site. The peak of the site is 1:00 p.m. with a total demand of 1,116 spaces. At the peak of the entire site, 1:00 p.m., the hotel will have 226 spaces (437-211 = 226) available to share. The restaurants and retail will require 41 spaces (725-684 = 41), leaving 185 available to share. The office/health club will require 122 spaces, therefore, needing to share 25 spaces (122-97 = 25). A shared parking surplus of 160 spaces will exist on site (185-25 = 160). Since this surplus is greater than under previous conditions, with no health club, the buffers for all the remaining uses on site will be improved. The critical buffer previously had been the retail buffer. The retail buffer now calculates as: 160 surolus shared oarkinR 684 spaces provided + 41 required to meet code = 21.1 % The buffers for the office and and health club will be as follows: Office/health club = 160 surolus soaces - 57 reauired to meet code 97 spaces provided + 57 required to meet code ill = 67% 154 /XUUfJDO@fJo[J{]@[l[JD r Ms. Tambri Heydon -3- May 31, 1988 Given the peaking characteristics of the proposed uses and their ability to share from surrounding uses, the parking proposed for the office/health club will have sufficient buffers as required by the City of Boynton Beach. Very truly yours, KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ~~~,~~ Steven G. Godfrey, P.E. Vice President SGG/SOR:jsl 467701L5-S1.sor / jsl rI" .' . u> ~ cS: "" ~ 4 "" .... ~ is cS: .... ... 15 !a N >- c ... ~ ~ U> ;:;; >- ~ ~ ~ ~ i "- ... ~ ~ U> uJ ..J co <X: I- ... ...o ,..., ~~ o .... I I I . I , , , I I I I . \ I I I I I I I I I \~ I'"" I .... .-Ilffi .......... i\s I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I "" C> W ~ "" ~ I <-> 11: C> c:> .... o 0:: ....... ~~ ~ '" ~ >- u> .... "" :IC .... 8~ "" ;:;; ~ rD C> ...o ~ !a e u> .... "" i ~ o ;:;; "" <-> ~ ...o <-> .... ... ::c ~ '5:! -"" ;K"" <It ~ .... ::z "" on ...oN -.... 4 - .... "" =- 4 '" t:1 "" N ....- ~.... ... ... c:> "" .... .... ~ U> "" U;S~ ~,..:a -a....- ,.....4 -a_W tD ~ J~ .-=~ ~fi~ ~CSlCC ::cOO "'........ .... .... .... C> o ,;; ~ :II: .... "" ~ ~ .... .... .... C> on '" .... ~ o <:> =- -a '" .... ::: - ~ gs ~ .... "" ... ... \!3 <:> ,..., ;; ... "" ~ "" ... .,i. C o o ~ o N Ii> ,..., '" "" Ii> on ... ~ o ~ <:> ~ - o o .,i. C <:> C> ;:. C> .... N on "" .... ~ .... ,... ~ CD .... ... o <:> .,i. C <:> <:> .;; C> o .... N "" \!3 on C> ..., ... ... ~ .... C> o "" o <::> .,i. C o '" <; ... .... l5: .... .... :2 ,..., ... - ~ .... ~ ~ C> ... ... <:> o .,i. C C> <:> ~ ~ o o .... ~ ..., It'> ... o .... "" Ii> ... ;:;; ..., :: .,i. C o <:> - - ~ ~ o ,.. lE ,..., It'> C> <:> .... ... .... ... ..., o .... ~ 15 ~ ... o ~ <:> ... .... .... N .... on ... ,... on N .... ~ ... ... ~ <:> ~ C> o .,i. .,: C> <:> <:> .... M .... ... g ~ o $ ... ... o <::> ,..., ~ .... ~ .,i. 0:. <::> <::> N .~_._--~.-.". ~- C> ,... N .... ... ..., ... g; ... - ~ g; ... C> <:> CD <:> o .... N s:: 0- <:> <:> ,::; C> ,.. lE .... - .... ~ ... ... ,.., - ~ C> ..c ~ "'" C> N ... .,i. .,: <:> <;': - ... .... .... on ~ .... ,.., ,... on ,.., on ... ~ .... ... ~ ... <::> .,i. 0:. "'" ... on C> "" ... .... ~ .... ... C> .... ... ~ ..., ~ ... ... ... .... on .... on ... N .,i. 0:. o C> ~ .... ... C> .... "" II> on ... ..c ..c ~ "" - '" .... ~ <:> o ~ 0- ... ... ;:. C> ... ,..., ~ ... ~ "" CO .... ~ ... ... on ... QI) ... o o .,i. 0- o C> .;; l5: - N o ,.., <:> "'" C> on .... <:> <:> ~ .... CD CD !2 .... ~ .... ~ .... .... <::> "" "" <:> "" "" .... N .... .... N .... .... .... CO ... .... .... on :; .... ... ... "" ,.., ... ... CI'- .0 ,.., ,.., o <:> .,i. 0:. <:> "'" <; .,i. 0- ... o ~ .,i. .,: o o .... .... $: tD ;& e :II: o o ~ -'--'_.---~ -------------- QE RGLLA-'i Ii ~ lEA.iA....//61<.CSDI'<.../ ~ Sl?. _ i .. ~a-d-d-~~~~ ~~~/~.~: - ,-)-/fve/ #1}. 9j, ft(}~ == . 117- JUuteA ~r oF[1te... 33 53? 1ji ~:!J... ~~(~ CJu..b 1~ ~1; ~(I)t> ~.5Z% ....e<'<. I ~I(.,O e "- 3"- '1 q f. 4 P '1>l -r ~~~J6"J;1. + 3~ 330r 61r q 4-&(1 4-' ~1 JL :5 1 ,/4 '7 , ~ 1 'T ( ~~ rfJ\..V'- < (63 ,., (j;C' /; 3DD ~ Iq~,~ . -4' AD 'ItJJV'_ ~ . _ ~ i..f~ ~ ~ ~i. :s- :;Ji; I . (f)~/t/,,' /~)fJ,C;'1 F ~~~~~ (!)~,JA . ~(~,.! {i,' . i~,' i/E:e71, ,1 ,ilI,"~, 5(),...'If.. ~~.,~ ''-/' C.:rt'I': j,n; :, /l(-I--z~,"'AtS;: 1\ }/. /,1. /l/! j ,,'~ i 'I-""W K., : /~ l ,/ ..' II~~ vv ~@~~~~~~ , , - ttv-ff-.k~ ~.~ ~ -,-- -~. 1/ ~ / ~~.4/ ti ,)L"~~ ~~'c ~ !t>O% ~1 q~~/ ~ ~ 00%7 ': jO/iV' / ~(p r @ 1i bJ~J,~, ~~ q~l4f ~ -'I~' ~;;~> ~ \\'Z- ~v ~~/?:).~~:'" "-. .,' ~- -r: JJ , ,/) . ~~ ~t1-- W J I~ ~e {..^-. . .,~ ~ ..A:Z. ~~.. ..I . ... (j FMi.. ~ ~~ ~ .~~ ~ ~ ~ /ld.JnA~~ . L::') --;') " · ~ r 6J~~~~.~ ~~~~~~ d(ftu~~~~A~&/- ~~,~~' ~ - ~"f)~ . ~ @---I~ ~ ~? t ~Jv./~ , . ,'~ - ~. ' . ~ [) :!MJ~~~~~ y'@ ~ P:' fd-~ v~~. ~.~~~O- _~;d~-k~~ ~.~ (])~~ ~.? ~'7 ~ ~rr~~ ti-'fte-- v'W ~ ~-. '1~} t ? ~ ~ ' pmlU/ {J./ ~ ~ ~ rch ~ I ce> ~,j 8J ,~~ ~ !Y-/-1J .~~ft-yj ~ ~ 6-- I" -rr',-~- v- 1t/ ~ p-y r ~ u--~' -'(jJ~~~' ~f~~ qJ p+J ~ ft~ ~ h'- !JtJ ~. i~~? ?-'!3!<.tLLk:{T:r5 RES(fJ/~ r /4 WIrL-L- Df rA-:r L frP 1<.. fJ Cl--ff. f S Tf312 E-ke U? su/cE S /foULJ) F>>/JFL)r; /5 * Ir~-I-O-It--r () f- 6 FFCTJ 2. h- 6" FtloT 1t-.:rc:.ft-Cc9A!C{J:fE BLock WA-LL-Ts f<E-QG{+/2I-~ A-D u rr.rNt-x E5TPeMT-TkL ?oA/-I-~~ "3. /t 5.lTE P[J,JlJ /10 Df FTcA-r:rgN W,rL-C 13~ R-CGJ rAFRISO T (;) S ffo w _C;o H-t R E [J .J A P;~ 0 V I:)f r: Aii5 w+ rtf- T/J-E E-X-1-srJ-NtL fcJr-r- .;(fo{ ( /fo lEt S.:rrEj :r.AiCLufJj:Jv( P~:rVr:w~y (OAJ;1/~L rroJV-s'j RE){tJ cfJr-t OF lA-I< F:rA;~ S PA-cE 5> ~ A-A/;5 Tff-c Srf:~-l~-PV~ 0 r rrf-E CA-f f(()O f- A-AlP wA-- Lfw ;f-Y-5 Lf\ T!f-155J:Tf /(r.{5T BE f(~PLJr--rr.5j) tl<ftD R To life j:S5c(kJ/CE OF Jr !JC{:r-~j)+AJc.. f">ERJt.+f, 5 ~ It OJVJTi CJF T:rTLE /rN;') A- C:~ cJ 55 j)/t-/(f:;:.Nk kAlj) A(CLSS5 )tuRr:E}{EAlT W]:LL Of: l<-!3au.:rREIJ Fol< 5!f-IrKJN( of fJrc:r~+rPES .Jt-.A1j) .:rJl;TE~kA-r+o)./ C)f Ttf-{5 5:rrt !LA-Jv lA/rf!f-T!f-!: /f-oTEt:.sJr;:: t (JrA/., ;: Ttf-e TorJt-t ?t~Ro.55 FLooK A-REA- FoR fftE OF/=+LS/ j(ES-~KT:J5S ~>/fowAl ro L5C 5"0 1't' S&u;f-RJ3 /-13Er ON iff/: y+ T /.S f(;f-N A-ffuc k T+{))/~ T!t/3l*f?~r;fj~ {kLcfA[Jr TloN Fox 80 ru- () fF-ICES 1w!1[)JJlf:),-c.T If- . ' . _ S1fCT~f/S!/'- If. (('#.{ l..J31 ~...reC~.J, G (L GtE :r 5 / 3 :DA-Cf Pt:f:. 300 S62. C{lrP-E /-fJ3T tCF;f ~=-:J JtC-L t-ElkT!:-D OCLtf')oo!< FJrcJ:L--:rT:rE5 ...sf/Left As r tf-f5 ? <D 0 L- Jr-,f; j) T f5 )j )/+.~ Co c.t R T-S J (".t>> j] E ('fJ A/J.Il) C-C,R f'1 /0 t3~ Jr}J cr LLJr-/<. 7 aSE5 (0 fltJ:: ;(/'35oR T ;f-N,D /t--) ~C;U( If) [jJ:; GC Nt) r j2E6Lu.JRE //<0 v l-S:[:oN cf !rj)j).j.-rP:;AlJr[ PJr/<.f:r Iv ( Sf/refS. TffE S/tA-/<.Ej) f)A-Rf :r}/~ A-u oc.A-T -IO.A- 5 jf-oucD j? E f2i: v+s r:J5 Bk)f3=JJ 6# TffE-+Lio Vc" Tr WovU__?\ Jrl'r>r:Jt/<-- To fifz /t-/"jPRof/~~-J,-rE /0 (A-LC:U[.+/c _Sf: P .A R it- / t P Jr Ie JrJV Cc A-{ ( () /1 U LA- j+c)V (- u p V~ 5- Fe K /fff- cC'FFfc (5,/rN b Ttf-r: R-J~5of(r) h_s 1 If E Y Gvo U L 0 JrrPEJ:R ;0 J:X/tr!3+f /J1FfEREJvr fEA-1e f/t-Rk+/V~ /J fit k)J j) S ~ ,If j):r 5 C (/L S --,:r 0 Jv (J I'::: T ff-r s s /f-o fA (, D [5 E IJv CL uP f DIN T!f-E f(f5 fo R T~ 7v T tf-(:: ~ Pi<f3 v:ro fAS{ Y JrffRo VE fJ S /f)'-!:.L-=-j) I~R. k-rJV4 It-t[V{ A:r:ro)Js (o,1<. Tftf fcA-r );0. cZ, -S'/kJtrr )/~ CENrf/< AN'D hkRff cJr~[f)j/JE^ ts I<E5T}t-rA/(A-AlT A- R E 8 k5l:: 0 )/1} P JrR- T CJ;U ;f-- 7 ~ &00 3'4< Foo T ~ /::prCf. B C{:rC)):r}J?:. 0 {c- up '( ..f)/~ T tf-E f Jt-/Zc E L CU ff/3i2 E Tff c R f:50!<- T -{-5 fRo pes E [) # ~; [NeE- Tff-f- CJ ft=-;rCE- !JU;rLD:r);t {s TtJ 13f5 CrfJr.AJ~c: D To If- Co)y!31A/!3D {) F preE/ABoRT (of1PC!5XJ TffE (J ~rJJrrsT:rc~ j)A-TA- !r-)JjJ j]UFF-/3)( ckCc. CA L k T-FoN_5 {of( kLL !5X-+.5 T:rk~ tf 5 E 5 /f:),VE (]er=JJ hoDrp.Jc.Dt TlfE /<.Efo/~. T 5 uiJ}f:rrrEJ) FuR Ttf-E !<-&-5-0;< T /)u155 )va r rJvC{(At>f5 A-N at/JkiF-P VEf~s-:r{jN OF- TfrB tf<J:v;ro Cl5L; ./c 0B}{.+JTEIJ j)o{uJ1[3)JTA-T:ruN' f6/< THE bXf5rJ-N~ (AS (35 ~ W'tf:-:ti:. ,{f- r If- ;- 5 P u c u..}f E NT kT:ro Jv _~~[f-v C{ CD 13 E ~~uf3lt:r TT I~t> ~-L-' :rJJCO/(fOK /t--r!5D W+ltf-:t-Jv 6#! k 5j:AJa.LE- CD)i/J/2r:rf-EJvs;rV!5 l)ocuAE/./T, ff. G'o.A?f2.f);-~rVE /3)vca:}jr:[3RFAI~ /v2JrVvrk~5 A-RL= ^-fQ C{:rA~D FOK -J~:rTE f{yt-N Jrff'!<oV.lrLi t/2ELr)1rJ//r;2 J),\)rwrNus 0 P If- CoA/cf.S? TuA-L )lA-JUR/: ;i-R C )Iv r !f-{[EPrkB LE i 1, TtJ-e :rJJrfNr' 0 f T!f~ Coli PR E ftl3/UsrVE f[IrN IJEVELCJPJiENT ;)0 LJ:CrcS Fo;{(fREkTAENT u F 3"T<fJf(A W IrTI3/<- ({ (jAil) Fr":- rAOpt P A-V ;:() f~,f-I2~):)/~ A- j(E Jf-s :rs rrfJrr rr f3 ~ P+v ~f:- re fJ () rJ~;:z. k C-/CJr-c;s ~ t> .k/< f k t;<.:r 0 K /0 I3)Jr~ R:r NCc /}N r AI CE T SrR ucTu ~E ~ rIfE f'r.;:o P~5r::: () P((;f-:r ;(/H-'~ YC(j-!3/~0 " Iv' r ~,r~'Eera~ --~ /) c n ...,-; 'f,' - - -r 5 6) t 07'7~ S-i.k5.-- ~ $, Crv </--. r I J /'--' /:- S I Fe: r / 0 / lI-t-"75 ~ jJ6 L~crE_( II /0 ~ :rr r5 ;<E{oh ){E)v'j)[5f) TlI-A-i k to/l--D.r/tJa coke- BE ,/1:-0 vTD0P /~cR rrr-:r-r; ().~'[5 [o/JS~_<;/EJvr wrrlf- ~-fc r+o/V /1 - ytil OF ;f-fffA/[)J:X ~ ?oAl.r~ ~ 1(~)rJl OJv"~5+T1: Ti<Jt-r=p:rc FLoW fcJr;-JV ;ps /<[=& rA+IC!:~ Jjv C C C{ D -fA! fc ? Jrv [5)( f- /v r )( Jr;<k rJv uS /tAl J) r I< k F f::: ~C S:;rCZ)JS: 12. Soft [: TiP};; C9F 5.ftJE-wlt-ck c9R oTrt-!:R?!3/5EST>e;r/r-AI , (v/lr L f- CV It f .5lf-t5 fA CP (3 I~ P /2 0 V :p j) 13 D ~ I~~-/!==: ' To (' 0.))11/ E:c T T tf-t5 f/~ 0 ? 05 ~ f) It C{ t T f- ~ /":: A-){ F [, t IJ2 o,-T L"Y:. LA; +- rrf-- Trt-f- ;<~5fJ k T, j]. ,PfClt-:rJJIt-~E CA-[[ ucJr-T:roA/S A-R t:- J(E62 a~ kEf)