REVIEW COMMENTS
CITY of
,BOYNTON BEACH
~
@--=-
" -. ""'
".." -. ~
.',~-)
~_.-~
120 N.E. 2nd AVENUE
P.O. BOX 310
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33435-0310
(305)734-8111
Office of the City Engineer
August 15, 1988
Mr. Steven G. Godfrey, P.E.
Vice President
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
4431 Embarcadero Drive
West Palm Beach, Fl J3407
.Re: Bicycle Path for the Gerulaitis Center and Catalina Multi-
Family Projects
Dear Mr. Godfrey:
Reference is made to your letter of August 10, 1988.
For the information of all concerned, I recommend that a crosp-
section for the private access road be investigated that would
provide within the right-of-way the 8 ft. concrete bicycle path
requested, assuming that the L.W.D.D. will not allow the bicycle
path in their easement.
A graphic representation of the situation as requested above
should show how the roadway could be draihed and show the rela-
tionship of the roadway with the eight foot concrete bicycle path.
Please advise if you have questions concerning the above.
RECEIVED
Very truly yours,
CITY
YNTON BEA~H~ ~.
t1~-
Thomas A. Clark, P.E.
City Engineer
AUG .1 ij 1988
PLANN.lNG DEPT.
TAC/ck
-q-
cc: Jim Golden, Senior City Planner w/copy of Aug. 10, 1988 letter
Don Jaeger, Site Development Administrator w/copy of Aug. letter
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent w/copy of Aug. letter
'(IT
_..-'\1:'.____
--
-------------
~6r
t
Kim/ey-Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive, West Palm Beach, FL 33407 . (407) 845-0665
Raleigh, Charlotte. Nashville, Virginia Beach, Washington, Dallas, Phoenix. Stuart,
West Palm Be"ch, Tampa, Orlando, Fl Lauderdale, Vero Beach. Fl Myers
August 10, 1988
4070T.00(07)
Mr. Tom Clark
City of Boynton Beach
200 N. Seacrest Boulevard
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach. Florida 33425-0310
Re: Gerulaitis Center
Dear Mr. Clark:
Thank you for. meeting with me to discuss the Gerulaitis Center in regard to bicycle
and pedestrian facilities. As we discussed, it is impossible for the Gerulaitis Center to
provide an 8-foot bicycle/pedestrian facility around the periphery of the site in the Lake
Work Drainage District Canal due to current policy of the District.
We have developed an alternative approach to accommodate pedestrians and
bicyclists separately. The internal road for the Gerulaitis Center will be constructed 28
feet in width, consistent with State standards for providing a wide curb lane for bicycles
on street. This is deemed to be the most effective and appropriate way to handle
bicycles on site, since the speed and traffic volume on the road will be low.
Pedestrians will be accommodated through an interconnected sidewalk system. We
have expanded the originally proposed sidewalk system to more completely integrate the
pedestrian facilities. Based on our discussion, the sidewalk system will be connected to' a-'
future sidewalk on 22nd A venue and a connection will be made south of the lake to the
hotel site. This connection will probably be through a stabilize"d pathway.
During our meeting, Don Jaeger came in and suggested that there '''las 3. need to
connect pedestrian facilities to Congress A venue. We are investigating the possibility of
doing this, however, it seems unlikely at this point that such a connection can be made.
If a pedestrian connection was to be made between the hotel site and Congress A venue,
this should have been requested at the time that the hotel site was being reviewed and
approved. Now that the site is constructed, the opportunities for a pedestrian
connection may no longer exist. From a practical standpoint, we have integrated the
pedestrian and bicycle facilities such that it is convenient for residents in the rental
apartment area to walk or ride to the tennis center, the hotel, and the Catalina shopping
Center. It seems rather unlikely that residents of the rental apartments would walk to
areas south of the Lake Worth Drainage Canal due to the long distance between the
apartments and any destinations on Congress A venue. Therefore, pedestrian activity
would be minimal or none and thus the inability to create this pedestrian connection
should not have any significant negative impacts.
Building client relationships since 1967
'[ cr~U:if;jofXJ@71ifJ1
1---
,
_._._--~----_.._-----_._._-~_._----- ----------.---.
------. ,.-------------
Mr. Tom Clark
-2-
August 10, 1988
We appreciate the opportunity of discussing this matter with you. It is our
understanding that when the matter is reviewed by the Technical Review Committee, in
conjunction with the preliminary plat for the project, that you and Don Jaeger will
support these bicycle and pedestrian concepts recognizing they provide an effective
alternative to the previously requested 8-foot bicycle path.
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
~~~
Steven G. Godfrey, P.E.
Vice President
SGG:map
Copy to:
Dick Critchfield
4070TOO-L081O.sgg
M E M 0 RAN DUM
July 11, 1988
TO: FINANCE DEPT.
?ROl1: JAMES J. GOLDEN, SENIOR CITY PLANNER
\~E: PROCESSING OF CHECKS
..'
.. ,.."
Att~ched please find the following checks:
James Driscol. for Stonehaven MPM, in the amount of $200.0(;
Benjamin Aaron, for Glass Bldg. Parking Lot SP, _n the amm 'It)f
$300.00;
JaIT8S W. McManus, Casa Blanca MP, in the amount )f $400.00,
D.U.. Assoc., for Cross Creek Centre, SPM, in the amc,mt of
$~~(O.OO;
Kc~havarz & Assoc., for Boynton Lakes Plaza SP, Ln the amOl nt of
$350.00;
A&A Fences, Inc., for Solomon SPOO, in the amount of $200.0,
North South Construction Corp, for Catalina SP, in the
amount of $300.00; (ck. #5927)
North South'Construction Corp, for Catalina SP, in the
am()unt'of"$~50.00; (ck. #5928)
North South Construction Corp, for Catalina SP1'1 in the am, :un~ 0 E
$200.00; (ck. #5926)
Coscan, for Quail Run SPOO, in the amount of $20i .00;
Land Design South, for Tara Oaks SP, in the arnO'lnt of $290 00.
(ck. #1075)
. ,
Land Design South, for Tara Oaks SP, in the arno mt of $60. ; 0 ;
(ck. #1073)
Rays Auto Storage, Inc., for Auto Save ERC Ferm _ t, in the:imont
of $120.00; (ck. #123)
Rays Auto Storage, Inc., for Auto Save ERC, in :he amount 0f
$80.00; (ck. #116)
North South Construction Corp., for Congress La:es MPM, in the
amount of $200.00.
Account Numbers for deposit are indicated on Hi; backs of:hc
checks.
~ t. ~'<.
.:r.!JOOES p. GOLDEt,
JJG:ro
Attachments
.
", "
'I! t\.t\':
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 91-262
July 8, 1991
TO: Technical Review Board Members
Christopher Cutro Planning Director
Vincent Finizio Admin. Coord. of Engineering
Ed Allen Fire Chief
Ed Hillery Police Chief
John Guidry Utilities Director
Bob Eichorst Public Works Director
Charlie Frederick Parks & Recreation Director
THRU: Don Jaeger, Building and Zoning Director~
FROM: Michael E. Haag, Zoning and site Administrator
RE: ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
City of Boynton Beach Chlorine Building ,
1620 South Seacrest Boulevard
Elkins Construction
The above referenced project is nearing completion. Prior to the
Building Department issuing the Certificate of Occupancy, I would
like to ensure that you do not have any outstanding or pending
issues concerning this si te that must be rectified (excluding
issues that are covered entirely with a city approved surety).
If the issues are related to permits issued by the Building
Department, please provide this department with the permit number and
nature of unresolved issues. If the unresolved issues are not
permi t related, notify the owner or the owners agent to ensure
that the issues are rectified.
Please respond to this office within ten (10) days so that we may
proceed to issue the Certificate of Occupancy. Thank you for your
cooperation and timely response.
J Scott Miller
on Johnson, Inspector
Kevin Hallahan, Forester
File
'~\)
C~~
~~ -, ,
\,' ~o~.
~~\,. . . '\)t.\
~\~r.,
~"'~
,~-
.. ~....
MEH:ald
CHLORINE.SDD
l t
STAFF COMMENTS
GERULAITIS TENNIS RESORT
NEW SITE PLAN
Building Department See attached memo
Fire Department See attached memo
Engineering Department See attached memo
Utilities Department See attached memo
Planning Department See attached memo
MEMORANDUM
TO
Carmen Annunziato
Planning Director
OAT.
July 6, 1988
"IL~
""OM
Don Jaeger
Building Department
5U8nCT SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
GERULAITIS TENNIS RESORT
AT CATALINA CENTRE
As a condition of site plan approval, the following comments should
be incorporated into the related documents by the applicant:
1. Indicate on the plans the proposed type of construction in conformance
with Chapter 6 of the Standard Building Code. State if the proposed
structures will be fully sprinkled. The proposed square foot areas
must comply with Table 400 of the Standard Building Code.
2. All buildings, two (2) stories or more in height, must be automatically
sprinkled in accordance with NFiPA 13 as modified by NFiPA 231 and
NFiPA 231C. This requirement will be contingent upon Ordinance #88-32
receiving second and final reading from the City Commission.
3. The free-standing sign shown on the plans along Congress Avenue will
be considered an off premise sign and, as such, is prohibited by
the Boynton Beach Sign Ordinance.
4. Health Department approval is required for any proposed food service
within the building.
5. Submit details of the dumpster enclosure indicating location of
columns.
6. A buffer wall is required along the western property line.
7. The building is required to be accessible to the handicapped in
conformance with State of Florida Handicapped Code.
8. The pool and deck are located on two (2) separate properties. Unity
of title between the properties or language relating to ownership of
off-site amenities must be provided.
9. Details for the tennis court lighting must be provided.
10. Building overhangs are not permitted to encroach into required
setbacks.
11. Fences located within setbacks are limited to a six (6) foot overall
height.
Sewer and water flow rates, prepared by a registered engineer, must
be submitted for the pool, jacuzzi and pool house.
The pool must be designed by a registered engineer.
Proposed signage must be resubmitted for Board and Commission
approval because a sign package is not included in this submittal.
The applicant's prompt compliance with the preceding comments will insure
a timely permitting process.
Memo
RE:
July
Page
12.
13.
14.
15.
to Carmen Annunziato
Site Plan Approval:
Gerulaitis Tennis Resort
6, 1988
Two
All plans submitted for public record by a professional registered
in the state of Florida must be signed and sealed.
DkJ~
DJ:bh
XC: E. E. Howell
@----.120E.BOynton
. - - .
"~ ~ P. O. Box 310
. ~~::' Boynton Beach,
TO: Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director
FR: Debby Davis, Fire Inspector
DT: July 7,1988
RE: Gerulaitis Tennis Resort - Catalina Centre
Reviewing the plans for Gerulaitis Tennis Resort, it is apparent,
the few parking spaces in front of the fire lane access may hinder
the fire department. This problem needs to be addressed.
...
Q...u.AA
M E M 0 RAN DUM
July 6, 1988
TO: Mr. Jim Golden
Senior City Planner
FROM: Tom Clark
City Engineer
RE: Gerulaitis Tennis Resort
COMMENTS:
1. An eight foot concrete bicycle path should be planned to go
in the drainage easement on the west side of the property
and to continue to Congress Avenue. A permit is required
from the Lake Worth Drainage District.
2. Minimum lighting intensities to be shown on the plan at the
most remote areas.
3. Paving and drainage plans are noted to be preliminary.
Drawings should be complete with all construction details
including typical sections and should be signed and sealed.
4. Handicap striping to be blue.
5. Conduit and wiring to be shown for lighting.
6. Stop sign detail is required.
7. Sections should show planter island and catch basins.
8. The cost for street lighting by Florida Power & Light Company
on the west side of Congress should be obtained and paid to
the City according to current procedures.
c-...... /
y~.-
Tom
TAC/ck
MEMORANDUM
To:
Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director
Joe C. Swan, P.E. ~~
for John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities ~) ;
From:
Date:
July 6, 1988
Subject:
TRB Review - Gerulaitis Tennis Resort - Site Plan
We can approve this plan, subject to the following conditions:
1. One of the water meters appears to be connected to a sanitary
line. Please correct.
2. Show all easements.
3. Water service lines are to be type ilK" copper.
4. Add a note to the effect that the City will maintain main line
sewers only. Show details, including cleanouts, on all
service lines.
5. Revise the sanitary sewer detail to conform to the City's new
standard.
dmt
bc: Peter Mazzella
M E M 0 RAN DUM
July 7, 1988
TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
FROM: CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
RE: CATALINA CENTRE GERULAITIS TENNIS RESORT
STAFF COMMENTS
Please be advised of the Planning Department's comments in
connection with the above-referenced request for site plan
approval:
1. This property requires replatting. Any changes to the
site plan resulting from preparation of the plat will
need to be processed through a site plan modification.
2. provisions will be required at time of platting for
shared facilities and cross access integrating the
hotel, office/health club and multifamily residential
projects.
3. A six foot high buffer wall serving as a continuation of
the existing wall on the shopping center site is required
abutting residentially zoned property, unless a variance
from the Board of Adjustment is granted.
4. To provide continuity and adequate pedestrian circulation
among the hotel, office/health club and residential
projects an eight (8) foot wide concrete bike path is
recommended by the Technical Review Board to be provided
along the entire length of the perimeter access road
from N.W. 22nd Avenue to Congress Avenue.
5. It is recommended that the landscaping proposed along the
perimeter access road within the residential project be
continued along the perimeter access road within the
office/health club and hotel projects.
6. The sidewalk system shown on the site plan does not
correspond to the landscape plan.
7. The loading zone must be relocated closer to the
building to be usable and serve its purpose.
8. Lighting details are needed indicating illumination
level, wattage, photocell activation, manufacturer's
specification and an energy efficient light source
consistent with comprehensive plan requirements
such as metal halide or high pressure sodium.
9. No scale is indicated on the water and sewer plans.
10. A freestanding sign on the premises would require
site plan approval. All other signage for this
use would be permitted directly through the
Building Department. Off premise signs are not
permitted unless a sign variance is applied for
and granted by the City commission.
11. Final paving and drainage plans have not been provided.
The drainage system must meet the intent of the
comprehensive plan in that runoff must be diverted into
swales and landscaped areas prior to discharge into
drainage structures.
-2-
12. At the July 5, 1988 Technical Review Board meeting, the
Technical Review Board recommended approval of a revised
shared parking study for the existing uses at Catalina
Centre Plats No. 1 and 2 and the Gerulaitis office/health
club resort based upon the methodology presented. One
hundred ninety four parking spaces are required for the
office/health club and 95 have been provided. The
methodology evidenced the opportunity for sharing to occur
between the hotel and the office/health club at the 1:00
p.m. and 8:00 p.m. weekday peaks. The recommendation for
approval was contingent upon revised documents being
submitted substantiating a 10% buffer.
The revised shared parking study provided is not acceptable
in its current form and will need to be revised at the time
of final sign-off. A marked up copy indicating detailed
comments and the changes needed is available to the
applicant and traffic consultant in the Planning Department.
It appears that the required 10% buffer can be met.
,
C~N .S:-ANN~IAT~
CSA:ro
cc Central File
MEMORANDUM
To:
Carmen Annunziato, Planning
Director(~ol~
Utilitie~
From:
John A. Guidry, Director of
Date: June 21, 1988
Subject: Gerulaitis Tennis Resort
We offer the following comments on this site plan:
1. Clarify the purpose of the 8" x 4" tees in the water main.
2. Clarify sanitary and water services to the building, specifying
their size, materials and details.
3. We require a minimum 10 foot setback from Manhole No.9.
4. Indicate all utility easements.
5. Trees are not permitted within utility easements without specific
written approval from this department.
6. A minimum 5 foot clearance is required between hydrants and
shrubs.
7. The water main on the south side of the parcel is currently 10
inch diameter and should be extended as such.
dmt
bc: Peter Mazzella
1tl1CE1\1~n
j'l' 2,2 l~o
\)~y1.
i>v.t-l~\~G -
;~ - -' .
-------'
.~~-
-)
MEMORANDUM
June 15, 1988
TO: TOM MCMURRAIN
FROM: JAMES J. GOLDEN, SENIOR CITY PLANNER
RE: GERULAITIS RESORT AT CATALINA CENTRE
Please be advised of the Planning Department's comments in
connection with the above:
1. Wall detail for dumpster enclosure should indicate a
height of 6 feet.
2. A 6 foot high concrete block wall is required abutting
residential zoning.
3. A site plan modification will be required to show
shared improvements with the existing plat no. 1
hotel site, including driveway connections, removal
of parking spaces, and the sharing of the lap pool
and walkways. It is recommended that this modifi-
cation be submitted concurrent with the proposed
tennis resort.
4. This property requires platting. It is recommended
that the preliminary plat be submitted concurrent
with the proposed tennis resort.
5. A unity of title and a cross parking/access agreement
will be" required for sharing of facilities and
integration of this site plan with the hotel site plan.
6. The total gross floor area for the office/resort is
shown to be 57,946 square feet on the site plan application.
The parking calculation for professional offices and the
health club is one (1) parking space per 300 square feet
of gross floor area (Section 11-H.16.d.(20) and e(B) ).
All related outdoor ancillary facilities to the resort,
such as the lap pool and tennis courts, will not require
additional parking as they are ancillary to the principal
(resort) use. The shared parking allocation should be
revised based on the above. It would appear to be
appropriate to calculate separate parking accumulation
curves for the offices and the resort, as they would
appear to exhibit different peak parking demands. A
discussion of this should also be included in the report.
7. The previously approved shared parking allocations for the
plat no. 2 shopping center and Marie Callender's
restaurant are based in part on a 75,000 square foot office
building occupying the parcel where the resort is proposed.
Since the office building is to be changed to a combined
office/resort complex, the statistical data and buffer
calculations for all existing uses have been modified.
The report submitted for the resort does not include
an updated version of the previously submitted
documentation for the existing uses. This documentation
should be submitted and the revised data incorporated
within a single comprehensive document.
-2-
8. Comprehensive engineering drawings are required
for site plan approval. Preliminary drawings of a
conceptual nature are not acceptable.
9. The intent of the Comprehensive Plan development policies
for pretreatment of stormwater runoff from paved
parking areas is that it be diverted over a grassed area
prior to entering an inlet structure. The proposed
drainage scheme is not acceptable with respect to
these policies.
10. It is recommended that a loading zone be provided for
this use consistent with Section Il-J of Appendix A,
Zoning.
11. An on-site traffic flow plan is required, including
pavement markings and traffic signs.
12. Some type of sidewalk or other pedestrian walkway should be
provided to connect the proposed multi-family project with
the resort.
~~~
JJG:ro
cc Carmen- S. Annunziato
Tambri J~ Heyden
Susan O'Rourke
Central File
M E M 0 RAN DUM
June 6, 1988
TO: Mr. Jim Golden
Senior City Planner
FROM: Tom Clark
City Engineer
RE: Site Plan, Gerulaitis Tennis Resort
COMMENTS:
1. Roadway construction for access road to be shown and
detailed and identified with respect to R.O.W.
2. Paving and drainage plans to show elevations, construction,
drainage and drainage calculations all in accordance with
the Parking Lot Ordinance
3. Extruded curbs on top of asphalt are not acceptable.
4. Drainage structures are not allowed in paved areas.
5. Lighting intensity should be shown on plans.
6. All landscaped areas and paved areas to be dimensioned
with set back dimensions from property lines or buildings.
7. L~ghting plans should include wiring circuits.
8. Survey should show the Access Road R. O. ~'l.
9. Traffic control devices should be shown, including pavement
markings.
~
y ~ t!f~
Tom Clark
TAC/ck
RECEIVED
JUN 8 1988
p\.AN~\NG o~~t"
--
-
.,.
'....
'~:J
:- 5'
....
.(i
;~
'f.:
:;~
\,,,
....
,~.
MEMORANDUM
2 June 1988
TO:
Peter L. Cheney, City Manager
FROM:
Carmen S. Annunziato, Planning Director
RE:
Gerulaitis Tennis Resort - Catalina Club
On May 31 and June 1 of 1988, the Planning Department received an
application for site plan approval which provides for the
construction of the above-mentioned project on a part of the
remaining, undeveloped portion of the Catalina Club/Congress
Lakes Planned Unit Development (PUD) (see attached location map).
The applicant in this regard is C & R Developers, Inc."and Tom
McMurr~an is the applicant's agent.
Upon review of the site plan, the Planning Department concluded
that the plans, as submitted, are not consistent with the
approved Planned Unit Development zoning, and master plan, and
further that a violation to the City's subdivision regulations
may have occurred. In order to better understand these issues, a
review of prior development approvals is provided.
In 1982 the City Council approved an annexation, plan amendment
and rezoning which provided for the development of the Congress
Lakes Planned Unit Development. Congress Lakes was bisected in a
north/south manner by NW 22nd Avenue with 524 units planned north
of NW 22nd Avenue and 736 units planned south of NW 22nd Avenue.
Also proposed within the PUD was a major private recreation
facility a~ NW 22nd Avenue and Congress Avenue, southwest corner,
and a network of public roads which provided access to the
Planned Unit Development and connected Congress Avenue to NW 22nd
Avenue, south of NW 22nd Avenue. Several parts of the PUD were
subsequently platted and developed, including Mahogany Bay and
Post Landings north of NW 22nd Avenue. The projects north of NW
22nd Avenue provides private recreation on-site. With respect to
the Congress Lakes site plan (that portion of the PUD remaining
south of NW 22nd Avenue) Phase 1 was platted and two buildings
were constructed, then the project was abandoned and put up for
sale.
In 1985 Ocean Properties proposed that a portion of the
remaining, undeveloped Congress Lakes PUD be rezoned to
accomodate a Holiday Inn Hotel, an office building and a shopping
center. This rezoning of 26+ acres of land was approved and
resulted in the reduction of-211 multi-family units and two acres
of neighborhood commercial land uses. The remainder of the
undeveloped PUD which consisted of 525 units, a collector road,
and the master recreation area on approximately 44 acres was sold
to C & R Developers, Inc. To date, the C & R property has
remained unplatted and undeveloped.
with this explanation of prior development approvals in mind, it
is now appropriate to evaluate the current Gerulaitis Tennis
Resort against the remaining approved uses and master plan
requirements in the undeveloped portion of the PUD.
,
According to the approved master plan, three major elements
remain to be developed on the 44 undeveloped acres. These are
the master recreation area, a public collector road which
currently exists in part along the north side of the shopping
center and is to be continued to NW 22nd Avenue to align with the
entrance to Mahogany Bay, and the 525 units of multi-family
housing.
With respect to the master recreation center, this proposed use
is no longer an appropriate use of land because each of the two
existing residential developments (Mahogany Bay and Post
Landings) has provided on-site recreational facilities which meet
the subdivision regulation requirements. Therefore, it becomes
apparent that the remaining 525 units should be spread across all
of the remaining acreage. This conclusion is arrived at because
the total unit count in the PUD was based on the gross acres in
the PUD including the master recreation center when the PUD was
approved in 1982 (112 acres x 11.18 dwelling units per acre =
1260 units). The Gerulaitis site plan fails to take into account
this feature of the approved PUD. In fact, the Gerulaitis plan
excludes that portion of the PUD lying north of the shopping
center, while utilizing all but 21 of the approved remaining
dwe~ling units as follows: .
525 units approved but not developed
504 units proposed on Gerulaitis site plan
21 units remaining but not allocated
It is unreasonable to assume that these remaining 21 units are
going to be built on the 7.89 acres remaining in the PUD.
The reason given for this exclusion of land, is that C & R
Developers, Inc. is no longer the owner of the portion of the PUD
lying north of the shopping center. The Planning Department has
confirmed this fact with C & R's attorney. This sale of property
may constitute a violation of the City's subdivision regulations,
because the creation of a parcel wherein the dedication of public
roads is required is technically not allowed without the benefit
of filing a subdivision plat, and all lands within PUD's must be
platted.
The final item remaining to be addressed is the collector road
which connects NW 22nd Avenue with Congress Avenue. This road
was planned and approved in connection with the rezoning to PUD
in 1982. Traffic, land use and construction decisions were made
based on this road serving the PUD at the assigned location. The
Geru1aitis site plan ignores this proposed road at its assigned
location, and proposes instead a private driveway intersecting NW
22nd Avenue at the western property line. This not only violates
the approved PUD master plan, but also results in a dangerous
series of intersections as it conflicts with the driveway to the
north which serves Mahogany Bay.
To summarize, the Gerulaitis site plan is inconsistent w~en
compared to the approved master plan for the Congress Lakes PUD
in the following ways.
1. The site plan ignores the approved configuration
of land uses in the PUD.
2. The site plan misallocates density by utilizing
all but 21 approved units leaving these 21 units
to be developed on 7.89 acres which is unreasonable
to assume will occur.
3. The site plan does not conform to the approved'
system of roadways.
4. A violation of the subdivision regulations may
have occurred by the selling off of the parcel of
land north of the shopping center.
For these and other reasons such as a shortage of approximately
lOa! parking spaces on site and incomplete engineering and
utility plans, the Planning Department will not be able to
process these plans for approval.
'-
L- - -..-. - ( (( A-~
CARMEN S. AN~NZIATO
/bks
, \ \
\ ,
NGRESS LA;ES/~A T AUNA CLUS\\
PUD 'i
.
,
.
_ _ ..".....u.fu.~{.. I
__ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __ _-- _ _ _ . .,-._ .....w..........u.w...... ,
------- -- -- -:.- --- -------=
-
1 :i
.
~'\;i
l""~.'
p. T ,~I
, '
o :,
- .
: ,
: .
: ,
- .
.
...........: ,
: .
: ,
.
- .
: I
: .
: ,
AVS}../VE UI: ·
...II........I...........~ ~
. . ,
: :
: ::'
: .~ :,
""<11" - ,., I
<II" .~
~ ::p
........ : ~
.:. 7.89 ACRES: IlJ
~ :~
- .
- .
... H. ...{
- . .
_ .M
- .~,
'\. ..u.......J i
- .
t . '\ ,--....
I.' ·
,., t---< . ·
I : I .,---,:
f .' r---- . · .."
\ :', I-'- --i : f"""~
::: ~:
PROPERTY; 5\ ~5
I .' . · \
'., ---i ·
: : ( : ,
" .' ----4 ..
, . ( .
- .,
: ,
. .
: ,
. ~
: ,
. .
: ,
.
. .
: ,
: .
: \
.
. I
. ,
\\
.
,
.
,
-----.... ..
j
\
\
\
\
\
\
w
C & R'S
'- -22
~ - ......-. ---- .--- -
_._-------------~
... tmE1.=-_':~~::'.,-:
I .
,
\
crran ~ :
I I
I I
I t
I '
I'
I I
I I
'I
I
I
I I
~\:
I ;
I I
, I :
" : I
\ \
I I
\ I
~ I
_________.1 (
i:~.w. -;,:p: - -13.0 y"N- -i- ON -
--------.. ------ -- -----,..---
1/
~ .I~
pj
~
TENNI
~
...............
----C-:- 16
- - - - .--..... - - - - - - - -
CANA L'
..,.-----
-~-\
I
,
,.
I
I
\
I
I
I
NOT TO SCALE
!. l
~
~~
I!
MEMORANDUM
June 2, 1988
TO: FINANCE DEPT
FROM: JAMES J. GOLDEN, SENIOR CITY PLANNER
RE: PROCESSING FEES
Attached please find the following checks:
Plum Beach Capital Corp, for Cas a Lorna, Central Business
District, in the amount of $100.00;
James McManus, for Cas a Blanca Apts, Master Plan, in the amount
of $400.00;
Wendall Collins, for Mariners way, SPM, in the amount of $200.00;
MSM, for Citrus Glen, SF, in the amount of $200.00;
Lakes, of Tara, MFM for fence, in the amount of $200.00;
Donald Macneir for Sunshine Square (Anthony's), SF, in the amount
of $200.00;
Bavarian Restaurant, SFM, in the amount of $200.00;
D.R. Assoc., for Cross Creek Centre, SPM, in the amount of
$200.00;
North Sout~ Construction Corp., Gerulaitis Resort, SP, in the
amount of $300.00;
Gene A. Bernard & Assoc., for Meadows Square, SPM, in the amount
of $200.00;
Bryan Reynolds Assoc., for Homing Inn, SPM, in the amount of
$200.00.
Iro
~i~i1f
~... . _,' "'f~1'~'"H,\..f,:~'~
~~. :--,,1'~\~~~-~"-;:'."_\"':;''''" -/-
- /' .
. ~ ". "'~'. ;t;~"'''''':~.1 ' ' ,
--"
~'l_1
-'
i
- e
April 30, 1985
-----
-~ ~~.: ._:~ ~
:.. A .~_...
.. .;...., !' ..
.....- ,: \. #.
I :.
!; MAY 1~~5
c
<< ~..#
MEHORANDUH
TO:
Mr. Peter L. Cheney,
city Manager
r~.
r"ll".:..... ":.. . ".
:,..:-...... .:. '.-
'..: ._~......
rr:,~:~J r~?~ _:_C,.
FROM: Tom Clark,
City Engineer
...f;,....
\. 0-
~"-
-. -
Re: T.R.B. review of the varL:mce request submi.tted by
Walboyn Development (Catalin~ Center) for the collector
road to the adjacent subdivision. (Allan ciklin's letter
of April 24, 1985 to Mr. Cheney)
Reference is made to the subject variance request'which will be con-
sidered ata public hearing scheduled by the Council for the meeting
of May 7,1985 as advertised in the Post on April'29, 1985.
The T.R.B. met today, Tuesday, April 30, 1985 to consider the said
:equest as ~rovided for in the Subdivision Regulations (Article XVI).
The T.R.B., after reviewing the preliminary schematic drawings for
the Catalina Center~ Mr. Ciklin's letter and Exhibit "A" of said
letter; and after taking into account the provisions for variances
as provided by the Subdivision Ordinance agreed to consider two
options for recommendations to the Council as listed below.
1. Approval of the variance request subject to the dedication of a
60-ft. minimum right of way dedicated to the public along the
alignment as proposed in Exhibit "A"; a provision for a left
turn lanemfor northbound traffic exiting onto Congress with
County approval; and provision for a traffic signal when warr-
anted at the intersection with Congress Avenue.
2. To disapprove' the variance request and to require that an 80-ft.
collector street dedicated to the public extend through the
project in a central location to serve the Catalina P.U.D.
property to the west that would be consistent with the Subdivision
Ordinance.
The T.R.B. agreed to recommend Option No.2.
"
TAC:mb
Y/CL .~ - d~[
Torn Clark
t-
cc: Carmen Annunziato
,
I
t
.
-
o
'.
MEMOR~NDUM
April 30, 1985
TO: Mr. Peter L. Cheney,
City Manager
FROM: Tom Clark,
City Engineer
Re: T.R.B. review of the variance request submitted
by C & R Developers, lnc. for the Catalina Club
Property. (Albert C. Blanchard's letter of April 29,
1985 to Mr. Cheney)
Reference is made to the subject variance request which will
be considered at a public hearing scheduled 'by the Council
for the meeting of May 7, 1985 as advertised in the Post
on April 29, 1985.
The T.R.B. met today, Tuesday, April 30, 1985 to consider
the said request as provided for in the Subdivision Regu-
lations (Article XVI).
The T.R.B. agreed that a recommendation not to approve the
subject variance request be made.
':..
-=-~-~ -c:f/~
Tom Clark
TAC: rob
"
-----~_. ..... ....
,/ -. ...1-' ti \:; :' '.
Ii""'.' .:/1 ";".:J'%~>,. .
\) ...-
(.. 1.1~ .-
...... /1)". "... .... ~
: : ' ......,~ rl~'j :
j~.l: 1I~:::.... . :.
""..(.1;l'.,...:: .
., ~:.~..1:;,.::.~....
~':J ... .... . ......._
\i.,;J<v',-, ('
\~.~.;.
C".
.~
~.
c
,
<..&'
./
.
.-
~
e
I
t
~~-
~CZJ/AltJl ni,.e #~,d ~ Km~" ~~
Jf/-t~6 \.. ~<<--1
MINUTES-REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
MAY 7, 1985
payment of $8,178.27 to Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc.,
for services rendered on the Reverse Osmosis project. The motion
carried 5-0.
PUBLIC HEARING
Consider conditional use approval for the Tiny Scholar Nursery
School, 2304 South Seacrest Blvd., submitted by Ken Carlson. (It
will be necessary to open and then continue the Public Hearing
since final recommendations have not been received from the
Planning and Zoning Board) Public Hearing will be continued to
May 21, 1985 at 8:00 p.m.
Mr. Cheney said we had requested that the Tiny Scholar Nursery
School application be advertised for a Planning and zoning Board
Meeting, but the newspaper did not advertise it. It will, there-
fore, be considered at the Planning and Zoning Board's June
meeting. Vice Mayor Ferrell moved, seconded by Councilman
Warnke, to delete this item from the Agenda and place it on the
Council's Agenda for June 18. The motion carried 5-0.
~public Hearing for variance in reference to platting which
~requires the continuation of streets to unplatted property and in
reference to dead end streets extending beyond 1,320 feet in
length. Variances are to Appendix C, Subdivision and Platting
Regulations, Article X, Section 10 and section 100 of the Code of
Ordinances. (Walboyn/Catalina Project)
Mr. Alan Ciklin came before the Council to represent Ocean
Properties, the developers of the Walboyn project, regarding
access to the property at the rear of their project. They have
worked with the City staff, the County Engineer and the City
Attorney; it was agreed they would seek a variance to the sub-
division regulations so they submitted a proposed access way to
the C & R property behind Walboyn. The County Traffic Engineer
confirmed that an 80-foot collector road is not necessary to
serve the C & R project and that a 24-foot access road expanded
to 30 feet as it enters Congress Avenue would be acceptable. Mr.
Ciklin said they are agreeable to these requirements and to Mr.
Cheney's comments in his memorandum of May 7, 1985, except that
he would like clarification of his remark regarding the number of
curb cuts.
Mr. Cheney read his report giving the history of this p~ojectand
recommendations of conditions for granting the requests f~~
variance, having reviewed reports by the Technical Review~~
and the County Traffic Engineers. He said they feel the number ,L:.
of points of access to the 24-foot East/West roadway betwee~f"f_ I
Congress Avenue and the residential property behind the hot~5 198~
project should be limited. Mr. Ciklin did not feel ~t wa~~G'O~
necessary to reduce the number of curb cuts so drast~call~~!>l~'!"IVG"nEFT:.-"
" .~., \
-41
~
--,-,.-
---.
- 8 -
e
I
~
e
I
,
MINUTES-REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
MAY 7, 1985
the number of trips on the access road would be minimal and it
would create a hardship for them in placing their hotel on their
property and providing adequate parking spaces. The proposed
plan had shown 11 curb cuts; there was discussion as to whether
the number should be reduced to eight, five or two. Councilman
Zimmerman thought the roadway should not be built there at all
along the canal and coming out on Congress Avenue next to the
bridge. He described a situation at the south end of the City by
the sewer plant where problems have been encountered and the
County has required that the road be relocated. It was concluded
there is no ideal solution to this access problem. Attorney
Vance said the plan presented here is the best effort given the
parameters they had to work with; if the variance is granted, it
solves the problem in relation to maintaining the sanctity of the
subdivision standards. Vice Mayor Ferrell moved, seconded by
Councilman Hester, to approve the variances requested by both
Ocean Properties and C & R Developers with the stipulations of
City Manager Cheney's memo of May 7, 1985, with 2.a. stating
"Not more than five curb cuts to the access drive from the motel
area." and all of the cuts to be eliminated from the west end of
the property. A roll call was taken by Mrs. Boroni as follows:
Mayor Cassandra Aye
Vice Mayor Ferrell Aye
Councilman Hester Aye
Councilman Warnke Aye
Councilman Zimmerman No
The motion carried 4-1.
45 Foot Height Limit
Mayor Cassandra read what was on the ballot when the referendum
was passed in March of 1982 regarding height limit, as well as
his memo describing what is in the Code Book regarding this sub-
ject. Vice Mayor Ferrell said our ordinance is very clear cut,
but he asked Attorney Vance if a policy could be set stating to
what extent exceptions would be granted. Mr. Vance said a policy
should not be set which does not comply with the ordinance, as
the ordinance itself states what exceptions can be granted for
and allows the Council to consider each application. Councilman
Zimmerman added that the ordinance cannot be amended without a
referendum. Mayor Cassandra said he would like to have a State
Attorney's opinion regarding the difference in what appeared on
the ballot and what is in the Code Book. Attorney Vance said
State Statutes limit the ballot to 15 words, but the ordinance
was available at the time and was advertised in the newspapers in
its entirety.
Mr. Ben Uleck again came before the Council and said there were
over 2,000 petitions from individuals who wanted a strict limit
- 9 -
.~
-
((
((
,
(/In 7~)
~ zI~tP/d
AGENDA
May 7, 1985
VI. PUBLIC HEARING .
B. Walboyn/Catalina Project (Ocean Properties and
C & R Developers ,Ine. ) Access Variance
The property foz:merly known as the Catal~ Club and located on the west side of
Congress Avenue, both north and south of 2200 Avenue, is 'OC1W being divided into
three pieces as follows: .
-I
'j/'
/
1. A POD project north of 2200 Avenue.
~~
r
2. A lIIOtel, oonvention center and retail project sout;h of 2200
Avenue and facing on Congress Avenue to be developed by Ocean
Properties. .
3. A POD on ranaining land to the rear of the Ocean Properties land, to be
developed by C & R Developers, Inc.
At the City Council Meeting of April 2, 1985, in connection with review of
rezoning, the City Council approved in principal the'motel/convention
center/retail project concept and zoning proposed by Ocean Properties, and
instructed the staff to find solutions to the problem of providing access to
the POD to the west.
A review of the subdivision regulations which require acces~ to unplatted pro-
perty at the time of subllvision, detenni.ned that no solution was possible
without two variances being granted by th~ Mayor and City Councii, one for each
property. Variance requests were sul:mitted by the two affected properties
(Ocean Properties and C & R Developers, Inc.). 'Ihese variance requests were
reviewed by the TecPnical Review Board and that review identified access
problans which, in 'the '!'RBIs ju:iganent, will not be ideally resolved by the pro-
posal contained in the variance requests.
In light of the City Council action on April 200, after reviewing the TRB
report, and after reviewing reccmnendations fran the County Traffic Engineering
Division, I reccmnend the following in regard to the request for variance:
1. Approval of the prOposed limited access to the properties off Congress,
Avenue, north of the Boynton Canal Bridge (north bound left turn into
t.'1e property, south bound right turn into property and right turn only
out of property). This limited access and median cut has been approved
tJ~;~ (p Uf_: ;::Y;;:;;;;iM. I
~7::;~~~~. U1IlJ--~
-lD dlft- --.6; iD=- cf--/~ ~~
(
/"
''';
./'
'-
--
'.
-2-
l\)
p
2. Approval of the 24 foot drive as proposed to serve as the access to the
C & R Developer's POD to the west with the following conditions:
a. NJt mx,S ~ ~ curb cuts to the access ~ive fran the rrotel .
area.(~ e::;i) -
b. Granting by Ocean Properties of a pezmanent easement for access to ' I
the POD property in the rear.
c. Acceptance of maintenance of this access aisle by Ocean Properties.
3. Construction to approved standards and dedication -to the City of the
right-of-way at the northern end of the property which will provide
acccess to the POD (C & R Developers, Inc.).' .
4. As required at the April ,200 City Council meeting, filing of the plat of
the Ocean properties parcel.
These matters will again be addressed at the time that ~ h;~ nlahs are subnitted.
by Ocean Properties and C & R Developers, Inc.
&f~~
City Manager
PIC: sr
..
.
z
o
'"
..;
:r
.
:5m
^ -
::~
~~~
~. -
;f~
.. _. Q.
DQ.~
" . .
~ ~ .
~ 0
. .
~ 0.,
V>
o
c
..;
:r
~
10
"HHP
.; ~ . '/, ':i
/ t).. ,
\ \ ,. ~.
,~ I J ~.
\ ,~, 'I
I Il,- '('
,.--"__,
~._ _-L~:':.J..-__
rl~~Hi; gl
,h~l~~ ~~
"!.H~l~, -,~
h~ ~~-I~ ~
" >.
<<I
~~
~~
~
,
(lQ
::r
-
3'
(lQ
o
?~
~'"
~~
\
I
t1
~
o
c:
3
"
'"
-
~
,.,.,
::l
r"l
o
'"
S;
<l>
o
<l>
,,-
~ ~.
",-
~
,
. . \ ~ I,
P]';'
f ~ i i
I r.
I 111'
~n.
, '-r '"
~ &'f~
~h.'~
~~~~
). ; '~.
, i'
I 1 '~
l '
o r :~~. U"I J
,...,., ; e ~~.
\.lI or ., ~
~ ;: :r-
I-' ;0 00
~:;z r"l
t"'n ~ '"
- - -
~. :r o.
(""f'" ::l
,......
(7.1-
I
"
,
~
C"'l U"I
;;: r"l
" '"
=r <l>
;:;' ~
V> V'1 W
r"l 0 0
'"
fO
....
0
0
;; Z
<l> g
-
::r
:!'!
-
,'~
1I_
, '
~III~~' !l1j li!W1 ~. j::;.in:.~! ~ E1ilWl ~ n
~. j I 'j't:; '!'''If-! ~I'.~'!!il , Ii
I;' ~ i ~ II ~ ~H;;:r: ~ fHH Ii :' 0
f I ~ . .J ! I I I m.;1 i ! !:I I '"
_: " I I~~ II ~ ~ ~ ~:~:l~ r'j lA~i ti ~ !i~~' '"
"~~lJ 1~1,..... M.t.I?:~~ .tlll:h .. ~
.. lj,' ..,.". f,~-~'~ ~1!~l.l.ll.1Wj.l ~.j.l. f
I I i ~.. M~~~;~ ~ ~:~M: ~ ~
~ eteu:::t
<l>
~
\~ ..~ ~l
\ ~ ~~)
II:. f ',\
1~ \r~
,~ t
,q 1,"
~.~ ~Z
w! am
flth :.~~1i
~f-~~! ~;~i
J!l i J~n:
~~ ~ }i!!
'II! ~.;!
~ ' L: i
{! lriI
~1 l{~~
_______._1
!'. =-
rr.
i 11rl111 ~
, . ,i; I ~
L-16 Boynton Canal
--------------------~---sa~51~7.w-------------- -
.......'Z.S6'
-..'J
---:-
r-
'"
::l
0.
'"
r"l <l>
'" f'l
" ....
<l> '_..'_
~,
r"l'
:::1'" .
;:: . .
ro
r"l
....
o
~
::l
~
)>
;:;
:::I"
~. .~",?p...o~ - '-~,<..~ .................,-
(')
i>I
~
5'
'"
,.,.,
::l
(r.:
'"
~
:r
o
0.
i>I
-<
5'
;:)
o
,...,
~
0'
::l
~
~
-0
f'l
o
"
~
~
....
..
""
~
."
C:
~
....
..
1<'
..
'"
r
I
L-
-c
~
"""
3'
CI'O
r-
~
I;
~l~
~ ~ ~~
~ Ur>-
n ::~. :';'J,
~ t ~: ~
tll .:.. t:
1 ~~
q
:tin
t'\Iff'~
!!i ,..,,'.-Y
" " .j
~ I~' - "
" ll' 5 \
1\\ ~ ~
;II ·
;;
i
+-
o
~
~
r
L(
\.
!!! 11 ~'i I' ! ~I~:lll
;;
,...
ciQ' e~=~i~~~
:T
..
5'
OIl
0
Z ::I~
. ..
0 ~Ill
'" 1':::
-I
:r
0- 0
VI
0 C
c 3
-I 'tl
'"
:r i
~
"' ~l li ~a
~
l~ n
. w 0'
~;:i' '" ~ H l"1
c
~i... ;;;
.- -
;rt 0
~!t III ,. ~1 ·
.w' ".. . \f ~
~2 ~~
-::00
At
~ ~ ~~~ ~
.-3~ ~: 0..-
.t=EJ,..... ~~ 00
z- ;;,~ Q
z p; .~ -
~8-= g
,......
:o(}:l
t:"'>;1
0:l
o
:0
.-3
A
~
I'D
..,
OT
::>
..:,1
..i'
z
g
:r
VI
n
III
ii'
~
....
o
{
I
lit II ."
II , II III . pi !!!
I! 1"11 uml,11 ftllen, il.1 ~
II 1 .11,11.1 1,.11, I III
I ,1 ' ..
'Iii fH1llt = It !Ii
] Jill.iii
:r U!ffllf:CIr.~' It"
'! !lji4l~r.;lrI~~ I:! 01
i U'~li'l!~rnjl~ !!.
I '1I'I~:Il!f1 "I J?: 0
I!f'IIJ!:,:lJ,1111 f'I' ~
. f :I,-lj'lIt Iff J Q
r :;!I'li~fOOlliq.: j
I !J~m;r1'.J -" fJj o'
f I' '.al~'~ '.' If' ::J
J '.II ~.'.. '.'
l'f!'I!m."IU "1
l-16 Boynton Conol
I ,. ,...
I'll 'w' I /fill W" II ci}
I'f" ~glf 1111, ' J:~ I~ ~.
11,'!1 ~ii{ I IN i~iJ tj ~
'I'! ~1!lJ I!i I ,hP! &.
i Iii,:' ! I til, f-
,f 111- !III
____________~~! 1 ,III .
,... (> 0
~ ;:; ~
Q. :T ::J
~ ;' ~
'tl a
~:\ :~~~~ t.fU
I" ~.~, ~ 'I r t
~ 'f~ rh~~ ll~J
'.. ~ t ,\ ~ "'~I' ..i~
~ 'l: ~~.l .,
+- .;. nil
,I! f
- j j;'
OQ
:r
III
~
t M 'r I~
: I, t
t~ ~
I ~:
-- ---f."s7";-;l.W------------
(j
~
I>>
:;
I>>
H
1\
j"
f
Ii
r
:c
g,
0-
I>>
-<
~
:.
It
. il~\.r
; ,.....,
~~"~
.. ...:. ~
I' I .
i:S i
.1 l
r'l
o
::I
..
~
..
...
::
:v
~
!=l
~ .;
I.
..-
o
r">
~
o
:I
· 3::
'"
"0
~
er
.,...
"
01
,...
S
i'
~
i'
, ... ~.'. ...... .
j'
" ~~~. - - -- : ~ . - -HUOC~YY-~tJ ~OAD ~:~~ '=~'~ - .~CCCC=.-' t
h - ~ "'-=1...
R >- LUll J ~ ~ - ==
A " "JJ ,.., ~"A .
1 15.0 ) ,'., .
~ ffn~ LOCA TIO~E~~~E ~ ~
tL..p-Jr.. 9A T ALINA _. __ _ ._ __,
/ ,~j': "', - -) s:o Q I-- ,,.... f-1. )-;-
\rn ~~'~Jt;; '. - am: ~YNTON - ~;., I r
f:f\~ (""E~~ - s~':'.. ~~~"I<:\" <~r' - "\.'l~ ::R~~G
~~ ~ \ /~ \!1m il Qrll-U'~~~ _ ~ STATE s"
~;~~~;~\~~i; rd~ ~r y ~1AA - ~ -:111 E
~ rtA )' ~ I~~, q r I
...'* ' '. ,,8.~1 ~,,~'"' . U Ii,,' !
G)' GLS.l ~ NOT h,
~I~ 1=, IN. '" 1
.r? ~ it.fe' CITY ~ _F.1i(.
_r;:r rY ''',,' ~ ~ _ m!.:..~
"MELEAR PROPERTY" ~ ~ /I. ; I rrr
~~ ~ 't! " · '. . ~ ^ ^ ". I
E ~;~ I
rr .,~,J,.{ N -. ~ "" ~ I
l.!)~ 'Vi' I ,I : I . - , :t I
r-,
,
;
~
'''PUC
LUt:4.00
! r.J~1 rr1 _1.l~~111111111111 ~
I L ~ 411 Dill %dStiJltsigr C:3 \
J ~REVISED CATALINAlm ~
~CLUB P U 0 ~"""""'W""'" .
t-::-. . . . ~::.:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: "
- ,4 "'-":':~~:~:': :::::::::::::::::::::'~:::::::::::::::. , l'L~___
'p HA S E 2
;:::: .COMMER IAL PIC
5, A '" ~V E LOP iii E_N':}R~Y~~CCNC~:;"~"..~E"
If
~-
..~"""'.v,;...'". .
-~-
, -:..-'
..-~-'.B..oiiifiiiL'"'''' ..... '-CAAJil.' - '--
1/ L
nn....J ~ ___!
-- PHASE 3S, ". R1AA
TEN.NIS RESVRT :
'-
,
~
J-j
~I
l.U ...l-
~f='t'
/---
R
E
C
I;
R
t--.
Pip
, '- .-- P H A
~ COM
- DEV~
d (
=~ 1 .
ERCIAl'
OPMENT
,~--.-
i
I ,.:~~
..., I
, 111
rei
...nr
, 1-'-""'7' _
Fnnrrrmnrfllt'8lrnm- F
~~I I"
1 _ 11/1/1il T f MIlEScrY
o 400 800 JES'!''7) "'t. 9/'Ih....
C3 i im~ 't---: . ~ ::' : F I!,-~"i ,
...., ,., - \J I c~ J.- r " I- ,
=-=~'I r---- .-. RoAn \1 't: T ~ _ .. ~ ~ ~ I=' 1
R31'-:..:..: 1fT I-l .'1..'" . f-'~
,. ~/! ,'-~>. i
~ 11 J [l t l..fx J))~ .. - - 1
,n .> .::<(..,..,....... "'~, I
,-- "\., I TT~ 'R2 :
if ~--- ~ _: lH~ '- ~ ~. ~ ·
- !:!4 I' 11 [B R -...i ~ ~"~'r 'r,;.. ~ It 'ili; ;..i. l~ IfIO 'PI!
.oc ~ .__' ~"A, ." RTVIT: ~.". ro~~~,," .,,~.~. IT'. ,. \
.=-.J C '~ll,'j~l c r fr~:'''' ~,;JJ f~'~' !!!*~;;:l lI!.1 .'. :~1. I;"~ .:
fJC~' ~ .o..r.:..: : ~':JJ lit 11[1 ~:'1 114".("1' f
,;' [f~. I /" ~~~;. '1~tf0lI";;'~~dj :yg~:;ir
" ~ I iO'l1 :11:" ~ J ~ r1lEia ~f'~~:"'T ffi
IT. f I I j I F:., ,.J /( -J'" ~!~ "
' tT"\ ~ ' -....,.)L '\ _,~'-~ ,~. (J......:.... ~
:, ~): ({ .. ,', f' '. 81.;(':....,\'..:..,,' -"'~.,rT~.lr;:"'.-r
I. if', .!" I I ',___.. ." ,"-;- -". .,~' ,'" ( , ,. . "'''''' jo... ,
! , : I" " , I" ,,' , ' '. . I I ". '.
~
'~,
"""i l~!
-
p-
U
!
I!J_
~~
~!
~~
~
.~
~ - ~
C . :.i.
~~
"
,lit
~
~;~, BElIr
~ ,I]RBE[
J(~ r: ~ ~~~!~~ ~
Ii ~ II. ~~".
1 ; , 1 ~ J ~ 1)", (r- . ~ .11 r
10
Co,oy fO~ :;,~- a:=F
"REV 1'2;J 01'--J S
C>~
MC-~AU:::>'S
Kimley-Horn and AssociatesJ Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive, West Palm Beach, FL:JM~~lctJ
Raleigh, Charlotte, Nashville, Virginia Beach, Washington, Dallas, Phoenix,
West Palm Beach. Tampa. Orlando, Fl Lauderdale, Vero Beech. Fl Myers
May 16, 1988
Revised June 30, 1988
~677 .01(07)P87-55
-.--'
Ms. Tambri Heyden
City of Boynton Beach
120 NE Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33~35
Re: Catalina Center/Study
Revised to Include Gerulaitis Resort
Dear Ms. Heyden:
As requested, we have revised the parking analysis for Catalina Center
located in Boynton Beach, Florida. This revision is a comprehensive document
which includes a reduction of the amount of office square footage and the addition
of a Gerulaitis Resort (health club/tennis center) along with all previous changes to
the site, with the exception of the exclusion of the McDonald's outparcel. The
McDonald's outparcel was not included at the City's request. As a result of the
difference in parking peak characteristics of the exchanged land uses (office to
health club), the demand at the Catalina Center peaks at 1:00 PM and 8:00 PM.
These peaking characteristics are reflected in the tables and buffer calculations. ....."7
~r
The analysis was based on the City of Boynton Beach parking code; parking t.L1
generation rates recommended by the Urban Land Institute (ULI), ULI--the Urban
Land Institute Shared Parking, 1983; parking generation rates recommended by the
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Parking Generation--An Interim
Report, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1985; and the shared parking
recommendations of the Urban Land Institute, ULIu The Urban Land Institute
Shared Parking, 1983. All rates used in this analysis represent peak season demand.
Differences in seasonal peaks which exist among the land uses\eroposed were
conservatively ignored. wfnfel""
a.
Shared parking is an integral part of the Catalina Center analysis. Shared
parking is defined as parking space which can be used by two or more land uses
without conflict or encroachment. In order for shared parking to be utilized, the
peak accumulation of parked vehicles generated by different but adjacent land uses
must not be concurrent.
Building client relationships since 1967
..
.-----3
~
I
'V7f!r;r:-.:!c;;r'{7, (1J'r;- rc.,."
L:\::,W2/LU&Jijo !IL/0.;U U'u
I J
r--~-----'---
Ms. Tambri Heyden
-2-
May 16, 1988
Revised June 30, 1988
Catalina Center will consist of four land uses: office, retail, health club with
ancillary facilities, and hotel with restaurant, lounge, and conference facilities
contained wi thin the hotel. Considering the land use mix, maximum parking
accumulation will occur on weekdays.
An analysis has been made of the northern parcel, which contains 146,325
square feet of retail space, and the southern parcel, which contains 33,338 square
feet of office, 24,608 square feet of health facilities, and a 166-room hotel with its
auxiliary uses including 18 suites. The north and south parcels were analyzed
separately and combined. The analysis was based on information provided by
Ocean Properties, on the January 21, 1985, site plan of the total development, the
August 27, 1986, site plan of the retail parcel, information provided verbally in
August, 1987, the outparcel site plan of December 28, 1987, and supplemental
information provided in 1988.
Our analysis demonstrates that the proposed parking will be sufficient to
accommodate the parking demands of both the northern and southern parcels,
whether they are considered individually or together.
Northern Parcel
ULI and ITE are the most widely recognized sources of parking generation data.
For a retail development of the size of Catalina Center, ULI recommends a rate of
four spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area. This would indicate that
586 spaces should be provided for the northern parcel. ITE recommends a weekday
parking rate for peak season (Thanksgiving to Christmas) of 3.25 spaces per 1000
square feet of gross leasable area, which would require Catalina Center to provide
476 spaces for the retail parcel. As per the a~~~}>.ed retail site plan, a total of
"'R is' ~spaces are proposed for the retail parcel,. n 8.1 %) more than required by
I ULI rates and~ (45.4%) more than indicated by the ITE peak season rates.
~.6 .fl1.::1-
. j.u~ lost- The Boynton Beach parking code, for retail use, is generalized to accommodate aU
1.:rr-- ~ shopping center sizes. The code requires five parking spaces per 1,000 square feet
..}v~' e ,..tof gross leasable area. According to ULI, this is a rate appropriately applied to
6i'Y'~--fSli~ ~ retail developments greater than 600,000 square feet, over four times the size of
~.t~ ,'lJ-r Ir'\ the proposed Catalina Center retail parcel. Under the Boynton Beach parking
~Oc~t 6 code, the Catalina Center retail parcel would be required to provide 732 parking
J./I tJ.- ~ ~ J.. spaces.
7Y~~ ~
'~IVI !~
~I 'l:t~
(~::t. I/IfP( It> ~ It~.
Of); " ,..l (/(lVf1lY
fA. )
4677.0H07)P87-55
,"
--'
') 'I
I ;----y-:>'f?~,''l n ,''...J'--'-;:--, I
, I' 'L'I ' ", ,/ '~', 170" " /I 0 'fliJ]'71IL
r i L- "-' '-JL -,U --J i....! L\...':::'J
I I
Ms. Tambri Heyden
-3-
May 16, 1988
Revised June 30, 1988
Southern Parcel
A~
The nature and location of the health club suggests that many of the patrons of the.>l59'o +;'1,
club will be office employees, hotel guests, residents of the adjacent Catalina Club ttllowdtd Q.
and users of more than one"use in the club. These factors permit a reduction in the ClIY1.si~.f-
1 parking provided. The..Jor1"'sp\ces internal to the health club at the peak demand w,"+/" ~"i6
(,Jho....--t i b Z. represen~of the vehicles using a parking space on site. These vehicles have a j... lb~~71
~ t>~ rv~t'\j primar~ trip purpose at one of the other use~. ~n site (ho~el,. office,. retai1).~~~
, Accordmg to personnel at local health club facll1tJ.~~/. the majority of tripS to a ~~I r1d1-no.e--
health club are secondary trips; therefore, ~~teDwas used.. The swimming ----'::: ~~.....,
d . ....,......,~'" fOOl
pool an outdoor courts are enpected 1'0 generate demands @ntlrely front the uLI.el -~ooot~t{/.
l::lSCS on site. ThcreforJ... atfi(p.percent J~.tc~~al captur~ was aoo.}i@d to these...us~_ t, i .
~ I-tH3 ~~ -j~c.: I ~~ ~tJ-'/(Mj K.~ t.1rw p4.-r~I"~""~l
Table 1 (attached) outlmes the parkmg ef!land WhICh can be expected for the !
southern parcel using ITE and/or ULI generation, rates. As shown in Table 1, @~tJr/ i.
without considering shared parking,~parking spaces, €ire required under ITE/ULI ~611'#~
recommendations. 5~ &57'., re-tfi, C71~ hi"I tii~,.
\' \.EV (\0 :SW
Compared to ITE and ULI, the Boynton Beach parking code is more conservative ~-f1~
for office, hotel, and restaurant/lounge land use, but requires fewer spaces for hLL-/-M. c.L..
conference facilities. Parking demand for the southern parcel generated using the 8';;~
Boynton Beach parking code is shown in Table 2 (attached). As shown, without ~
considering shared parking, the Boynton Beach code would require j>?"spaces to be Pn ~
provided for the southern parcel. (p11 ~+;:~~
-fe~'
As previously stated, the physical layout and mixed-use character of the southern ~~ ~
parcel lends itself to shared parking. Table 3 (attached) shows the peak parking tl o-filic.v.
demand projected for Catalina Center's southern parcel using the generation rates I
recommended by ITE/P,U, and considering the shared parking recommendations of I
ULI. As seen,.Jr.8'6'" ?p~f:es are required to meet the peak parking demand, well I
below the 586 proposed for the site. Table 4 (attached) shows the peak parking I
demand for the southern parcel using Boynton Beach rates for parking generation, I
and ULI recommendations Jor shared parking. As seen, under these criteria, peak I
parking demand will b~ spaces. The 586 spaces proposed represents a projected I
surplus ofM'spaces. 50'/
;17
I
I
I
Given the hotel/office/health club/restaurant land use mix proposed for the
southern parcel, it 1s reasonable to assume that shared parking will occur within
the parcel itself. Analysis of the site plan shows that numerous parking spaces
within the parcel are convenient to the four land uses which will allow shared
parking to occur.
--.-J
4677.01 (07)P87 -55
.
,r-~~----~-
"
~ j/7c; r'" fWl
i, l U:cDUfJDU@f!lc:!ru@[J'0J
r~
Ms. Tambri Heyden
-4-
May 16,1988
Revised June 30, 1988
Based on the above analysis, parking proposed for the southern parcel of Catalina
Center should prove sufficient to handling its parking needs.
Total Development
Given the mixed-use character and physical layout of the Catalina Center site, the
most reasonable approach for analysis of the total development is through use of
ULI shared parking recommendations. A total of .~parkin&.~~, f7 propose
for the development. la'74-- :::: y~ ce.- hud4
f ,3~ v~ I
$'1 /..{lU'i C OJ ~rs
Projected parking demand for the total site using ULI's shared parking
recommendations are shown in Tables 5, 6, and 7 (attached). Tables 5 and 6 use the
ITE/ULI parking generation rates applied in Table 2 for land uses other than retail. bK"~ /Dr
Table 5 uses the peak season rates for retail generation, and Table 6 uses ULI rates t?4a./! PYAI
for retail generation. Based on discussions with Boynton Beach City staff, as the ~
various hotel components are being evaluated separately, the ULI rate of 1.0 space tt(c- Dlh-).Jd~
per hotel room and the ULI residential rate of 1.6 for the hotel suites is the 1/vs-it- f-+
appropriate parking generation rate to be used in the analysis. Table 7 reflects this ~ ~J~ 4:.'/
rate for the hotel room and suite generation and Boynton Beach code rates for all.~ ~
other uses. Iu-~
tU~
As shown, considering shared park}J;,~, the nvmger of parking spaces recommended
for Catalina Center ranges from ~ to ~depending on the generation rate
selected. It should be noted that in all the above scenarios, except where the
Boynton codes are applied to each land use, sufficient parking space is provided on
site even without considering shared parking. For the remainder of this analysis,
the more conservative Boynton Beach rates reflected in Table 7 will be applied.
The City of Boynton Beach requires that a 10% buffer be provided to ensure that a
sufficient number of parking spaces are available at the time of peak use. Based
on consultation with City of Boynton Beach staff, and analysis of the layout of the
total site plan, it will be conservatively assumed that the retail and the office uses
share only from the available hotel parking of 432 spaces. The restaurant
outparcel may share from the hotel or retail. Also, due to the layout of the site
which is not especially conducive to shared parking between the retail or
restaurant and office uses, buffer calculations have been performed separately for
retail, restaurant outparcel and office uses.
By Boynton Beach code, the buffer is calculated as follows:
Buffer = Surplus Shared Parking
On-Site + Shared Parking Provided
4677.01(07)P87-55
i
i
I
I
,
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
i
~
.
i~I--- --Ii
: i rr!'ir-c--ct7,-o-,nn !Lr7@[J7fjIJ
.1 !"\ '-. f ,I 7!l1UI '(~, ,I, 001 ~ I 0 i (i
I'! '-' \_"'.__'-'_1...; ~--'U u w./ U ,
,'-______ I
Ms. Tambri Heyden
-5-
May 16, 1988
Revised June 30, 1988
*
The peak hours of parking demand for the site are 1:00 PM and 8:00 PM as shown
on Table 7. At 8:00, the hotel usage will require 359 spaces of the 432 provided
leaving 73 spaces available for sharing with the other uses. Neither the retail or
the office/health club w\!J require any shared parking a1- this time. The
office/health club will use~of its 95 spaces, leaving .JI.6"itrailable sp~~es. The
Marie Callenders restaurant outparcel will J1Jted to share JK' ~aces ~j9
accommodate its parking code requirement of~lS' A surplus of spaces of 1) - ~~~
46 ,sr1 spaces therefore exists for the hotel site, leaving a surplus of ;;4 'f 4t =)J'5 b1
spaces for the office/health club. The buffer for the office/health club (to three
significant figures) is therefore:
-0/5' f/1 ~1, +-
95 +~x 100 =.6.Z-+%
go a;f 8:00 p"""
As calculated above, during the peak hours of parking demand, 73 spaces of the 432 '
provided for the hotel are available for shared parking. Also as shown, ..24'~f.aces
will be shared at this time by the Marie Callenders outparcel leaving 73 - ~"::f ~ 1- S-
spaces available to be shared with the retail. The peak demand of 637 spaces for
the retail hts been met by the ~SDaces provided. This leaves a surplus of~-
637 =$ ~aces on the retail -si~ Overall, the surplus for the retail portio'iffs
~ + 49 = 104. The buffer for the retail (to three significant figures) is therefore:
51 -t'45~ q~ '" I
1~9 (p I~.I
-'9f+~ x 100 =~
J;f.t + 14- a+- f':'co p.,.."...
During the peak hour of parking demand of the site, the demand for spaces at the,
Marie Callenders restaurant outparcel will be 100% of i ts tota~ }e.,cwirements (fS. 1"1
spaces). Since 59 spaces have been provided for the restaurant, ~ ~aces will need
to be shared with the hotel. The buffer for the restaurant outparcel is:
9r-u-pkL&. -6vm~ ~ 45' SJ. 7 fJ-
hc+e-I ~ ~ 59 + J.4;'y= ~
~
At 1:00 PM the buffers are also met. The hotel will require 215 of the 432 spaces
provided leaving ~F to share with the other uses on si';~. The office/health club
will require ~~~ces, therefore needing to share 21 ?{5aces from the hotel. The
retail center will demand 732 spaces, therefore needing to share ~aces from
the hotel. Marie Callenders will not require any ffh ri!19 at 1;00 PM. Considering
these demands, the surplus shared parking is 217 - - J:5l... = 1)'2 spaces. The buffer
for the office/health club is: r Jf+ 135
IX 135 11.14-
~ x 100~
go
I
I
I
I
I
!
)
4677 .OH07)P87-55
,
*~~
.
,,-~~_..._._~,,~'
i CCC[7;DD15f)7o[){j@fl[f/J I
i,i - I
,----- -~,
I
Ms. Tambri Heyden
-6-
May 16, 1988
Revised June 30, 1988
::J.. The buffer for the retail is:
'7t ~ 13>' /8.+
-fH1 + 40 x 100 = ~
~YT#
The buffer for Marie Callenders is:
(-t) ,
11 oU' of(;ceff..u..{,fI.. ~
AI? - ~i - 44!#.~' 13s
...L I?~ /5S,I
n 2 _ x 100 = I O~O.L
59 + ~ +'CFJ. J. 7Q
d..Y
Although the site demand is similar at 1:00 PM and
grea ter at I :00 since the surplus comes from the hotel.
surplus is available for the health club and retail.
,/01- 35- +4-;. 1~5
8:00 PM, the buffers are
In other words, the entire
It is seen that using the Boynton Beach generation rates, both the office and retail
parcels meet the Boynton Beach buffer requirement of 10%.
J~7+-
Based on the above analysis, the J!,..m spaces provided for the total development
should prove sufficient in handling the parking demands of the development.
If you have any questions regarding this analysis, please do not hesitate to
contact us.
Very truly yours,
for
Steven G. Godfrey, P.E.
Vice President
JFB:SGG:SOR/mec
Attachments
4677 .01(07)P87-55
.
Q
Z
<
:s
UJ
Cl
~
Z
-
~
"
<
Cl..
Q
Z
- <
UJ UJ
,.J V'l
c:Q :::l
< Q
.... Z ..
< V'l
..J UJ
....
,.J <
UJ "
U _
" ,.J
< :::l
Cl.. -....
Z ~
ell: -
UJ
:c
....
:::l
o
V'l
"0 ~
(1) II)
'"' (1)
.... u
&ctI
(1)1/)
0:::
c::
o
....
+-'
"* g
"0
(1)
a:
o
~
\J\
~
'*
\\\~~~
N 0
N lI"I
~
\{)
~ :) <>
~~ll~~~~
~J1
~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
*
- *
..J c::
::> 0
+-'
~ c::
LlJ >.
.... 0
_ c:J
* *
* *
c:: c::
o 0
+-' +-'
c:: c::
>. >. :i
00......
co c:J -'
~
i 1;;;, i
I IS i
I ~ I
~
@)
1<::::5
~
I o~
t5
~
~~ ~\
*' *'
o 0
~
~
* * *
:i LlJ LlJ LlJ :i
::> !:: !:: !:: ::>
.
. +-'
..... . '*"': .
~+-' o-E
0- ~ III
III 0- '"'
III 0 . +-' +-' +-' +-'
o 0 U .... ctI ctI ctI +-'
o 0 lI"I U c:: (1) (1) (1) ctI
!::.!::..:::::~~~~~~
o 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ _
.. oNNNII"\
--4 ..... ..... ........-t .
III III III III
+-' +-' +-' +-'
ctI ctI ctI ctI
(1) (1) (1) (1)
II) II) II) II)
~ ~~~~\:q~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~j~N ~1~
~ ~ ~
+-' +-'
c:: c::
~ ~ 00
~ II) ~ ~ (1) c::
(1) +-' ._ _ _ ctI ctI 00....
U _ _ c:: (1) (1) +-' +-' c:: +-'
~ ctI 0 c:: +-' +-' II) II) ~ (1)
~ (1) 0 (1) 0 0 (1) (1) 0 (1)
o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a: 0::: ~ ~
+-'
....
III
c::
(1)
+-'
c::
-
. . . .
+-' +-' +-' +-'
........~~
. . . .
III
+-'
0- 0- 0-
Il) II) II)
II)
E
o ....
0" 0 c::
III '"' ~
00 0
o 0
~ "
(1)
III
::>
"0
c::
ctI
~
.a
~
-
U
+-' II)
5 E ~
o 0 .-::
u 0 ~
a: I/)
-
-
(1)
U
'"'
ctI
0.
+-'
~
o
-
E
o
o
a:
.
II)
+-'
c::
ctI
L..
~
ctI
+-'
II)
(1)
L..
'"'
o
~
(1)
+-'
ctI
'"'
LlJ
....
-
(1)
~
+-'
~
+-'
.~
"0
(1)
II)
~
III
+-'
c::
ctI
L..
~
ctI
+-'
III
(1)
L..
-
(1)
+-'
o
~
'"'
o
~
II)
c::
o
....
+-'
0.
E
~
III
II)
ctI
:i
::>
*
~ ~\
\ b \
\ @ \
Q s-:"\
:'..'::l
~ 0 \
~~ <r ~
~ i';t\
~ ~~ ~\ ~ \ \,S C::S
0 0 '^ -.D 0 ~
0) 0) 00 l""\ Cl' 08
.';: u -
?,-(l;) Q, \ ~
O)rjl ,~~
ct. 0;0 ~ ~
\(\L
~~ ~ \i~ c?- c?- '# -,R c?-
o
0 0 0 0 0
l? ~ -\
I;) ~ t' O~
Z "='
~ ~
~ ~ -~ ~\ ; -.D 0 -.D~o7
('I l""\ '" l""\ ~
c.. -
$ o (l;) - ~
~ ::!;;o
~ rjl -4- ~
~
I;) ~ cC 1 \.
~ ~ 0) \1.< ~-~,
~ ~ t,j
~ (l;) -::3-- 'D
ct. ~
< ..... ~ "II'
c.. .. -0 g- ..... .c:;-
~ ~ ~ 0-
C ~ ..... l/'l S l/'l l/'l ~~l/'l
~ ~ S 0 g- ~ ~
0 ..... 0 0 (l;) (l;)'.>~
0) 0.. g- O) ~ O)~(l;)
("ol ct. 0 0 0 l/'l l/'l 0)
~ -" 0 '^ ~ ~
~ - 0 l""\ -" - .... '^ '^ ,^'_ l/'l
~ c: l""\ 0 - - '^ S ~ ~ ~.~o7
':) .... l""\ l""\ 0 0 ('I - _3-
~ ;:t. . . . - - -
8 . - ('I - -" -
~ ~ l""\ - - - -
(l;)
~ 0..
cC I;)
...a ~
it ~ . . . . l/'l ~ ~ l/'l l/'l ~
~ < ~ "'" ~ "'" s ~ ~ ~
..... ..... ..... ..... 0 .... (l;) (l;) (l;) (l;)
c.. "'" . . . . S ~ ~~~\
< .... ~ 0- 0- 0- 0
0. ~ l/'l l/'l l/'l l/'l ~
c: 00 '^
~ ~ 00 00 0 0 00 ('I
0 0 0 = -
.s l""\ = - ('I
~ l""\ -.D r-
~ o. .. .. ..
l""\ = ('I = '-t\ '>t\
a l""\ ('I -
'5 ~
~ 'i -;::a
b ~
~ 'ia
~ a- s
~
? ~ l/'l l/'l .9- %
-0 ~ S
.g 5 ~ "'" "'" ct.
~ - 0 .... ~ ~
() () 0 ~ l)t)
,..J ct. rjl ~ ~
~ ~ ~ c:
f. l/'l ....
~ - - "'"
.... % s ~ ~ 0)
- - ~ ~ l/'l
.... (l;) 0 0) ~ 0)
..... 0 0 ~
..... ~ 0 :r. :r. ,..J ct.
0 0.- ~
----------~-
.
TABLE III
SOUTHERN PARCEL PARKING DE"AND USIN6 IrEfULI 6ENERATION
SHARED PARKINS ANALYSIS - NEEKDAY
JOB NU"BER: 4677.02
JOB NA"E: CATALINA CENTER
DATE: JUNE 30, 1988
HOTEL
------------------------------------------
OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLU GUEST ROO" RESTfLOUNGE CONFERENCE ROO~ T.~ Sl1
PEAK DE"AHD: 83 0 SO 4 (,3 177 7b 148
Ii)
HOUR OF THE DAY $/0
b:OO A.". 2 0 0 13~ 177 15 0 215
7:00 A.". 17 0 1?J.- 150 15 0 204
8:00 A.". 52 0 3 1 }..)- 115 15 74 280
9:00 A.". 77 0 5 1 3>- 97 15 148 3b3
10:00 A.I'!. B3 0 10 1 3~ 80 15 148 356
11:00 A.". 83 0 15 1 .3J- 62 23 148 351
12:00 NOON 75 (> 25 2 3.:l- 53 38 148 359
1:00 P.". 75 0 35 2 3.;t. 53 53 148 385
2:00 P.~. 81 0 30 2 3;)..- b2 4b 148 387
3:00 P.". 77 0 30 2 'J'- b2 42 148 379
4:00 P.". 64 0 25 +-r 90 39 148 383
5:00 P.I!. 39 0 35 1 t" 106 53 148 422
b:OO P.I'!. 19 0 45 1 1,1 124 68 148 445
7:00 P.". b 0 SO 4 t,3 133 7b 149 454
8:00 P.I'!. 6 0 50 4 .,~ 159 7b 148 490
9:00 P.I'!. '1 0 50 4 t..~ IbB 76 148 ~50l
...
10:00 P.". 2 (> 45 2 ft' 177 b8 74 396
11:00 P.". 0 0 35 21 ~~ 177 53 0 2Bb
12:00 "IDNISHT 0 0 25 21 ~,:).. 177 38 0 261
.
TABLE IV
SOUTHERN PARCEL PARKINS DEIIAND USING BOYNTON BEACH GENERATION
SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS - WEEKDAY
JOB IlUIIBER: 4677.02
JOB NAIIE: CATALINA CENTER
DATE: JUNE 30, 19B8
HOTEL
------------------------------------------
OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CL GUEST RODII REST/LOUNGE CONFERENCE ROO" TOTAL
PEAK DEIIAND: 112 0 83 4 (,~ 221 126 74 ~lb1t:t
Ci)
HOUR OF THE DAY /)s'~
6:00 A.II. 3 0 0 3:,}- 221 25 0 270
7:00 A.II. 22 0 2 2 j:;., IBB 25 0 258
8:00 A.". 71 0 -4 2 3.).. 144 25 37 301
9:00 A.". 104 0 8 2 3~ 122 25 74 354
10:00 A.II. 112 0 17 3>- 99 25 74 348
11:00 A.II. 112 0 25 1 3'>- 77 38 74 347
12:00 NOON 101 0 42 1 3~ b6 63 74 366
1:00 P.II. 101 0 58 1 3.r- 66 88 74 408
2: 00 P.l'1. 109 0 50 13;}.. 77 76 74 406
3:00 P.II. 104 0 50 1 3.)- 77 69 74 395
4:00 P.II. 86 0 42 2 If1 99 63 74 393
5:00 P.II. 53 0 58 4 (,} 133 88 74 447
6:00 P.l'!. 26 0 75 4 (,3 155 113 74 484
7:00 P.". 8 0 83 4 '-3 166 126 74 498
B:OO P.II. 8 0 83 4 1.,,3 199 126 74 531
9:00 P.II. 3 0 83 4 (,3 210 126 74 ~55'1
10:00 P.II. 3 0 75 2 'IY 221 113 37 478
11:00 P.II. 0 0 58 2 ~~ 221 B8 0 388
12: 00 IHDNISHT 0 0 42 2 7..L- 221 63 0 346
...
TABLE V
SHARED PARKINS ANALYSIS ITE RATES FOR
RETAIL USE, ULI/ITE RATES FOR OTHER lAND USES
SHARED PARKINS ANALYSIS - WEEKDAY
JOB NU"BER: 4b77.02
JOB NA"E: CATALINA CENTER
DATE: JUNE 30, 1988
H01'El
------------------------------------------
OFF I CE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB GUEST ROOIt REST/LOUNGE CONFERENCE ROOM TOTAL
PEAK DE"AND: 83 47b 50 1 (,3 177 7b 148 ~/013
~ I
HOUR OF THE DAY ~/Q
b:OO A.l'1. 2 0 0 2 3~ 177 15 (I 215
7:00 A.It. 17 38 1 3.l- 150 15 (I 242
8:00 A.I1. 52 8b 3 1 3~ 115 15 74 365
9:00 A.I1. 77 200 5 3:.1- 97 15 148 5b3
10:00 A.I1. 83 324 10 ?J-. 80 15 148 680
11:00 A.II. 83 414 15 3+. b2 23 148 765
12:00 NOON 75 462 25 3;L 53 38 148 821
1 : 00 P .It 75 47b 35 1 3~ 53 53 148 861
2:00 P.I'!. 81 462 30 13~ 62 46 148 848
3:00 P.I1. 77 452 30 ?>~ 62 42 148 832
4:00 P.II. 64 414 25 2 * 80 38 148 797
5:00 P.II. 39 376 35 4 "'3 lOb 53 148 798
b:OO P.It. 19 390 45 4 (,3 124 bS 148 836
7:00 P.lt 6 424 50 4 "'3 133 7b 148 877
8:00 P.". 6 414 50 -: 159 76 148 8Bb 1D1
9:00 P.I1. 2 290 50 24<;( 168 7b 148 764
10:00 P.It. 2 152 45 21 ~.;L 177 68 74 540
11:00 P .1'1. 0 62 35 21 3,).. 177 53 0 348
12:00 I1IDNISHT 0 0 25 21 3.)-- 177 38 0 261
..
TABLE VI
SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS UlI RATES FOR
RETAIL USE, UlI/ITE RATES FOR OTHER lAND USES
SHARED PARKINS ANAlVSIS - WEEKDAY
JOB NUI'!BER: 4b77.02
JOB NAI'lE: CATALINA CENTER
DATE: JUNE 30 I 198B
HOTEL
------------------------------------------
OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CL GUEST ROO" REST/LSUNSE CONFERENCE ROOI'! ~
PEAK DEPlAND: B3 5B6 50 /'3 177 7b 148 It&'3
tjp
HOUR OF THE DAY A5'%
6:00 A.". 2 0 0 2 $;1.. 177 15 (I 215
7:00 A.It. 17 47 2 3..2 150 15 0 251
8:00 A.". 52 105 3 3~ 115 15 74 385
9:00 A.I'!. 77 246 5 3~ 97 15 148 609
10:00 A.PI. 83 398 10 13.;L 80 15 148 755
11:00 A.I'!. 83 510 15 13.>- 62 23 148 861
12:00 NOON 75 568 25 1 3~ 53 38 148 928
1:00 P,II. 75 SOb 35 1 3.).. 53 53 148 971
2:00 P.". Bl 568 30 21 3;)- b2 46 14B 955
3:00 P.I'!. 77 557 30 21 3,}- 62 42 148 936
4:00 P.I'!. 64 510 25 29 f6 BO 38 148 893
5:00 P.Il. 39 463 35 41 '-'3 lOb 53 148 885
6:00 P.I'!. 19 481 45 1 "3 124 be 148 nb
7:00 P.Il. b 522 50 1 (,3 133 76 148 975
8:00 P.I'l. 6 510 50 (,3 159 76 148 ~;cl .~
9:00 P.lt 2 357 50 .. (,3 168 76 148 843
H>:OO P.I" 2 188 45 2 1<iI 177 68 74 583
11 : 00 P.I'!, 0 7b 35 3.;1.. 177 53 (I 362
12:00 Il!DNIGHT 0 0 25 1 3~ 177 39 0 2bl
!
!
..' .. ...
TABLE VII
SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS USING BOYNTON BEACH GENERATION RATES
ULI RATE USED FOR GUEST ROOIIS
SHARED PARKINS ANALYSIS - NEEKDAY
JOB NUIIBER: 4677.02
JOB NAIIE: CATALINA CENTER
DATE: JUNE 30, 19B8
HOTEL
------------------------------------------
OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB GUEST ROOPl REST ILDUN6E CONFERENCE ROOPl ~ 1
PEAK DEIIAND: 112 732 83 1 ~3 177 126 74 13~
ti)
HOUR OF THE DAV OlS't"
0:01) A.Pl. 3 0 0 2 ~)- 177 25 0 226
7:00 A.Pl. 22 59 2 150 25 0 279
8:00 A.II. 71 132 4 115 25 37 404
9:00 A.II. 104 307 8 97 25 74 637
10:00 A.II. 112 498 17 1 3.')..- BO 25 74 821i
11:00 A.II. 112 637 25 13:2- 62 38 74 968
12:00 NOON 101 710 42 1?1;1.. 53 03 74 1063
1:00 P.". 101 732 58 3;:L 53 88 74 1127
2:00 P.". 109 710 50 2 ,.1- 62 7b 74 1101
3:00 P .It 104 695 50 2 V- 62 69 74 1075
4:00 P.lt 86 637 42 29 +1 BO 63 74 1010
5:00 P.I'\. 53 578 58 41 {/3 106 88 74 998
6:00 P.II. 26 600 75 41 {,:~ 124 113 74 1053
7:00 P.I'!. 8 651 83 411/3 133 126 74 1116
8:00 P. II. B 637 83 4 ,,~ 159 126 74 c0D t15c
9:00 P.II. 3 447 83 4 (,1 168 126 74 942
10:00 P.II. 3 234 75 2 4-fi 177 113 37 bbS
11:00 P.II. 0 95 58 ~.). 177 88 (I 439
12:00 "IDNISHT 0 0 42 ,1 ,}.- 177 63 0 302
1
.
~~:-l iA (c-e, {h'~
r-...C--::.c,y-r
r:::/ Ie..
(i---------- -
I ['V'/o ~ ,'" ..
/ ----:r--~., ",-.-, .-1 '-.1 ,,,---- ,....,.---,....-
I ^ ". ! I,L,-) ,-/ II /l O.-JI, ~ '-', -l..'GJ~ 'I" -/ -,
L"" I'L' ,c--" 'Ll ", L
' '--' L1 '~ " -, ,--' r'..I '--- -- L' LJ.J i i
------------=:0
I Kim/ey-Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive. West Palm Beach. FL 33407 · (407) 845-0665 -~
Raleigh, Charlotte. Nashville. Virginia Beach, Washington, Dallas, Phoenix, Stuart.
West Palm Beach. Tampa, Orlando, Ft. Lauderdale. Vero Beach, Ft. Myers
May 16, 1988
ReVised~~ 27.1988 - A~ ~e:&b~r
4677.0l( "87-55 ~~,
Ms. Tambri Heyden
Ci ty of Boynton Beach
120 NE Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435
Re:
1Je~ ~o,.. I }JCLLLY'E
M.CfC;C,t<J AL.O~ - Co u,.,L.t:7
'0e:- U?7~ ~~ 'A~o~'T t?t~ -- ~
As requested, we have revised the parking analysis for Catalina Centre Iff
located in Boynton Beach, Florida. This revision is a comprehensive document ~-q,f.JN
which includes a reduction of the amount of office square footage and the addition l~ ~
of a Gerulaitis Resort (health club/tennis center) along with all previous changes to I
the site. As a result of the difference in parking peak characteristics of the
exchanged land uses (office to health club), the demand at the Catalina Centre
peaks at I :00 PM and &:00 PM. These peaking characteristics are reflected in the
tables and buffer calculations.
Dear Ms. Heyden:
Catalina Centre Parking Study
Rev ised to Include Gerulai tis Resort
The analysis was based on the City of Boynton Beach parking code; parking
generation rates recommended by the Urban Land Institute (ULI), ULI--the Urban
Land Institute Shared Parking, 1983; parking generation rates recommended by the
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Parking Generation--An Interim
Report, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1985; and the shared parking
recommendations of the Urban Land Institute, ULI-- The Urban Land Institute
Shared Parking, 1983. All rates used in this analysis represen t peak season demand.
Differences in seasonal peaks which exist among the land uses proposed were
conservatively ignored.
Shared parking is an integral part of the Catalina C~ntre analysis. Shared
parking is defined as parking space which can be used by two or more land uses
wi thout conflict or encroachment. In order for shared parking to be utilized, the
peak accumulation of parked vehicles generated by different but adjacent land uses
must not be concurrent.
\..
Building client relationships since 1967
-
-~----
.
:~,~C~,~jf5~7o ~'{(fC~0'B
Ms. Tambri Heyden
-2-
May 16, 1988
Revised July 27, 1988
Catalina Centre will consist of four land uses: office, retail, health club with
ancillary facilities, and hotel with restaurant, lounge, and conference facilities
contained within the hotel. Considering the land use mix, maximum parking
accumulation will occur on weekdays.
An analysis has been made of the northern parcel, which contains llj.6,325
square feet of retail space, and the southern parcel, which contains 33,338 square
feet of office, 24,608 square feet of health facilities, and a l66-room hotel with its
auxiliary uses including 18 suites. The north and south parcels were analyzed
separately and combined. The analysis was based on information provided by
Ocean Properties, on the January 21, 1985, site plan of the total development, the
August 27, 1986, site plan of the retail parcel, information provided verbally in
August, 1987, the outparcel site plan of December 28, 1987, and supplemental
information provided in 1988.
Our analysis demonstrates that the proposed parking will be sufficient to
accommodate the parking demands of both the northern and southern parcels,
whether they are considered individually or together.
Northern Parcel
ULI and ITE are the most widely recognized sources of parking generation data.
For a retail development of the size of Catalina Centre, ULI recommends a rate of
four spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area. This would indicate that
586 spaces should be provided for the northern parcel. ITE recommends a weekday
parking rate for peak season (Thanksgiving to Christmas) of 3.25 spaces per 1000
square feet of gross leasable area, which would require Catalina Centre to provide
476 spaces for the retail parcel. As per the approved retail site plan, a total of
688 spaces are proposed for the retail parcel, 102 (17.4%) more than required by
ULI rates and 212 (44.5%) more than indicated by the ITE peak season rates.
The Boynton Beach parking code, for retail use, is generalized to accommodate all
shopping center sizes. The code requires five parking spaces per 1,000 square feet
of gross leasable area. According to ULI, this is a rate appropriately applied to
retail developments greater than 600,000 square feet, over four times the size of
the proposed Catalina Centre retail parcel. Under the Boynton Beach parking
code, the Catalina Centre retail parcel would be required to provide 732 parking
spaces.
4677.01 (07)P87 -55
.
, ,
: '--- :'......,'~~~~~'~'!70w~(f"L--JJD ! :]'
L .~ ~
Ms. Tambri Heyden
-3-
May 16, 1988
Revised July 27, 1988
Southern Parcel
Given the hotel/office/health club/restaurant land use mix proposed for the
southern parcel, it is reasonable to assume that shared parking will occur within
the parcel itself. Analysis of the site plan shows that numerous parking spaces
within the parcel are convenient to the four land uses which will allow shared
parking to occur.
The nature and location of the health club suggests that many of the patrons of the
club will be office employees, hotel guests, residents of the adjacent Catalina Club
and users of more than one use in the club. These factors permit a reduction in the
parking provided. The 20 spaces internal to the health club at the peak demand
represent under 2% of the vehicles using a parking space on site. These vehicles
have a primary trip purpose at one of the other uses on site (hotel, office, retail).
A 25% reduction was applied to the health club facility, as per previous
correspondence with the City, to account for the secondary characteristics of trips
to this type of facili ty. The swim ming pool and outdoor courts are ancillary uses
which require no additional parking.
Table I (attached) outlines the parking demand which can be expected for the
southern parcel using ITE and/or ULI generation rates. As shown in Table I,
without considering shared parking, 597 parking spaces are required under ITE/ULI
recommenda tions.
Compared to ITE and ULI, the Boynton Beach parking code is more conservative
for office, hotel, and restaurant/lounge land use, but requires fewer spaces for
conference facilities. Parking demand for the southern parcel generated using the
Boynton Beach parking code is shown in Table 2 (attached). As shown, without
considering shared parking, the Boynton Beach code would require 683 spaces to be
provided for the southern parcel.
As previously stated, the physical layout and mixed-use character of the southern
parcel lends itself to shared parking. Table 3 (attached) shows the peak parking
demand projected for Catalina Centre's southern parcel using the generation rates
recommended by ITE/ULI, and considering the shared parking recommendations of
ULI. As seen, 508 spaces are required to meet the peak parking demand, well
below the 582 proposed for the site. Table 4 (attached) shows the peak parking
demand for the southern parcel using Boynton Beach rates for parking generation,
and ULI recommendations for shared parking. As seen, under these criteria, peak
parking demand will be 563 spaces. The 582 spaces proposed represents a projected
surplus of 19 spaces.
4677 .OH07)P87-55
I: I .1~1~/~\V70 ~ rO'l?'r;l i i
__.L---U::72- LI.-......:.../Uu'...J 1
,L ===::b
Ms. Tambri Heyden
-4-
May 16, 1988
Revised July 27, 1988
Based on the above analysis, parking proposed for the southern parcel of Catalina
Centre should prove sufficient to handling its parking needs.
Total Development
Given the mixed-use character and physical layout of the Catalina Centre site, the
most reasonable approach for analysis of the total development is through use of
ULI shared parking recommendations. A total of 1,270 parking spaces are proposed
for the development.
Projected parking demand for the total site using ULI's shared parking
recommendations are shown in Tables 5, 6, and 7 (attached). Tables 5 and 6 use the
ITE/ULI parking generation rates applied in Table 2 for land uses other than retail.
Table 5 uses the peak season rates for retail generation, and Table 6 uses ULI rates
for retail generation. Based on discussions with Boynton Beach City staff, as the
various hotel components are being evaluated separately, the ULI rate of 1.0 space
per hotel room and the ULI residential rate of 1.6 for the hotel suites is the
appropriate parking generation rate to be used in the analysis. Table 7 reflects this
rate for the hotel room and suite generation and Boynton Beach code rates for all
other uses.
As shown, considering shared parking, the number of parking spaces recommended
for Catalina Centre ranges from 904 to 1,154 depending on the generation rate
selected. It should be noted that in all the above scenarios, except where the
Boynton codes are applied to each land use, sufficient parking space is provided on
site even without considering shared parking. For the remainder of this analysis,
the more conservative Boynton Beach rates reflected in Table 7 will be applied.
The City of Boynton Beach requires that a 10% buffer be provided to ensure that a
sufficient number of parking spaces are available at the time of peak use. Based
on consultation with City of Boynton Beach staff, and analysis of the layout of the
total site plan, it will be conservatively assumed that the retail and the office uses
share only from the available hotel parking of 430 spaces. The restaurant
outparcel may share from the hotel or retail. Also, due to the layout of the site
which is not especially conducive to shared parking between the retail or
restaurant and office uses, buffer calculations have been performed separately for
retail, restaurant outparcel and office uses.
By Boynton Beach code, the buffer is calculated as follows:
Buffer = Surplus Shared Parking
On-Site + Shared Parking Provided
4677.0 I (07)P87 -55
,-:-;'r-':--;-"}if;!iV7o ,-:!!0';'~,'T' I,
L-"';'LL'-~G~(... '--'L---'::'lU~d
Ms. Tambri Heyden
-5-
May 16, 1988
Revised July 27, 1988
The peak hours of parking demand for the site are 1:00 PM and 8:00 PM as shown
on Table 7. At 8:00, the hotel usage will require 359 spaces of the 430 provided
leaving 71 spaces available for sharing with the other uses. Neither the retail or
the office/health club will require any shared parking at this time. The
office/health club will use 71 of its 93 spaces, leaving 22 available spaces. The
Marie Callenders restaurant outparcel will need to share 28 spaces to
accommoda te its parking code requirement of 87. A surplus of spaces of 71 - 28 =
43 spaces therefore exists for the hotel site, leaving a surplus of 43 + 22 = 65
spaces for the office/health club. The buffer for the office/health club (to three
significant figures) is therefore:
9;5+ 80 x 100 = 37.1%
As calculated above, during the peak hour of parking demand 8:00 p.m., 71 spaces
of the 430 provided for the hotel are available for shared parking. Also as shown,
28 spaces will be shared at this time by the Marie Callenders outparcel leaving
71 - 28 = 43 spaces available to be shared with the retail. The peak demand of 637
spaces for the retail has been met by the 688 spaces provided. This leaves a
surplus of 688 - 637 = 51 spaces on the retail site. Overall, the surplus for the
retail portion is 51 + 43 = 94. The buffer for the retail (to three significant figures)
is therefore:
94
688 + 40x 100 = 12.8%
The buffers cri tical to meeting the City of Boynton Beach's code are provided in
the following calculations. During the peak hour of parking demand of the site, the
demand for spaces at the Marie Callenders restaurant outparcel will be 100% of its
total requirements (83 spaces). Since 59 spaces have been provided for the
restaurant, 28 spaces will need to be shared with the hotel. The buffer for the
restaurant outparcel is:
43
59 + 28 = 49.4%
At 1 :00 PM the buffers are also met. The hotel will require 215 of the 430 spaces
provided leaving 215 to share with the other uses on site. The office/health club
will require 133 spaces, therefore needing to share 40 spaces from the hotel. The
retail center will demand 732 spaces, therefore needing to share 44 spaces from
the hotel. Marie Callenders will not require any sharing at 1:00 PM. Considering
these demands, the surplus shared parking is 215 - 40 - 44 = 131 spaces. The buffer
for the office/health club is:
131
95 + 80 x 100 = 74.9%
4677.01 (07)P87 -55
I~-=---- r? ,LJ' ~_n -I II
'. "~,, V;;;;IV7,., ~ /0",1-;',"0
L'\....lLL.-'L'l...-dl.::5s./'-'L uc-L Ji..) Ij
Ms. Tambri Heyden
-6-
May 16, 1988
Revised July 27, 1988
The buffer for the retail is:
131
688+44 xl00=17.9%
The buffer for Marie Callenders is:
131
59 + 28 x 100 = 150.6%
Although the site demand is similar at 1:00 PM and 8:00 PM, the buffers are
greater at 1:00 since the surplus comes from the hotel. In other words, the entire
surplus is available for the health club and retail.
It is seen that using the Boynton Beach generation rates, both the office and retail
parcels meet the Boynton Beach buffer requirement of 10%.
Based on the above analysis, the 1,270 spaces provided for the total development
should prove sufficient in handling the parking demands of the development.
If you have any questions regarding this analysis, please do not hesitate to
con tact us.
Very truly yours,
JBP/KC/mec
Attachments
4677 .OH07)P87-55
r lr=-
i: ,~
I ,~
; :.::-:
! l;:;
i ,C'
I' -=
l II ::_~
~~ !I' ~
V V) ~I II :;C~
... V I'<'. I'<'. 00 0'\ N 0 .::l- " I! ~
.- U 00 \0 .::l- N N LI"\ LI"\ 0'\ i! \~
5-ro ..... LI"\
VV') I II 08 .
~ ,I ' - I
I Ii c::s :
I.~
i '----
c I
0 '* '* '* '* '* '* ?J< '*
.- I
+" 0 LI"\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 I
'*~ N
-0
V
0::
~~ I'<'. C'f'\ 00 0'\ N 0 .::l- 00
Cl o u 00 00 .::l- N N LI"\ LI"\ .::l-
..... .....
Z ",..ro
....
II( V')
~ .
uJ * V)
Cl +"
- * C
(j V ....l c ro
~ Z u :J 0 ...
Z ... +" ~
- ~ C * * * ro
- ~
~ 0 uJ >. - - uJ uJ uJ - +"
c::.:: V') 0 ....l ....l ....l V)
~ II( f- ee ::> :J f- f- f- :J V
II( - - - - ...
0. ...
c.. 0
Cl Q '+<
Z UJ . V
c::.:: +" . +"
II( II( v <+-: +" ro
- <+-: . ...
UJ :c +" 0" E
UJ ro V) 0" uJ
...l II) II) ~ V) ... f-
c:c ::J 0 0 . +" +" +" +" -
~ 0 0 U .- ro ro ro +"
< Q Z ro 0 0 U C v v v ro v
.c
I- Z ... v .... I'<'. 0 ~ V) V) V) V +"
a. - - - - - - - V)
II( II) LI"\ 0 0 '-0 .::l- .::l- .::l- - .c
...l UJ . . N N N LI"\ +"
l- N ..... ..... ..... .-
....l II( ~
UJ ~ "0
U - V
~ ...J . . V) V)
+" +" E V) V) V) V) V) ~
II( ::> '+< '+< +" +" +-' +" +-'
. . 0 .- ro ro ro ro V)
c.. - +" +-'
UJ 'ijj 0" C" 0 C v v v v c
Z l- V) V) ... ~ V) V) V) V) ro
c
~ - v 00 00 00 00 0 LI"\ LI"\ '-0 ...
~
UJ +" I'<'. 0 .::l- ..... 0'\ 0 N 0'\ ro
C I'<'. '-0 ..... N N N
:c - +-'
V)
l- I'<'. .::l- V
::> I'<'. N ...
0 .....
v
II) +-'
- 0
.... .c
v ...
u 0
... '+<
ro
v 0. V)
+-' C
V) ~ 0
:J 0 E .-
+-'
-0 V) V) 0 0.
..0 E
c ~ V +-' +-' 0 E
ro 0 +-' ~
- .- C C ~
....l U 0 ~ ro ro V)
~ V') ... ... ~ V)
I v .c ~ ~ v c ro
+-' - .... ro ro ~ .-
I u - v V +" +-' C +-' -
;;:; ro +-' +-' V) V) ~ v ....l
'+< V 0 0 v v 0 v ::>
I 0 :I: :I: :I: 0:: ~ ....l ~ *
I
"
~
\\
\
~ ~ ~\~
~ l/l c-<"I ""' -.J) 0 -.J) r--.
1--' ~ ('l -.J) 00 c-<"I <1' c-<"I 00 r--. 00
._ u .... -.J)
~~ .... ....
~rJl
'"
*\ '# '# '# '# '# '# '# '#
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 ""'
('l
\j
z
~ ~
~ ~~ c-<"I ""' -.J) 0 -.J) r--. .::t
('l 00 c-<"I <1' c-<"I 00 r--.
.cC .... 00
0- o u .... ....
~ Q -~
'8 ....
~ rJl
\j .cC ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ 0 ~
'" .
.cC Z +"
......
0- .. -0 0-
Q ~ ~ l/l .
~ l/l l/l +"
S 0 S +" ......
~ ~ ...... +" 0- l/l
~ 0 0- 0 ~ ~ +"
('l ct. 0 o~ 0 ~ ~ l/l ~
l/l l/l ~
~ .... 1--' +" 0
~ '8 - 0 - .... ""' -.J:'\ 0 l/l
C. c-<"I 0 -.J:'\ C. ~ ~
? ('l '=' .... .::t
.... c-<"I c-<"I -
~ ;(. - - -
<6 . - . - .... ....
Q ,.. c-<"I .... .... ('l ..... ....
~ z ~
..(. \j p..
,.J z
~ ~ .
~ ~ . . l/l l/l l/l +" l/l
+" +" S ~ +" +" ...... +"
...... ...... ~ . ~
0- +" . . 0 .... ~ 0' ~
.cC .- 0' 0' 0 S ~ ~
l/l l/l l/l
0- ~ l/l l/l l/l ,..
C.
~ ~ 00 00 00 ""' 0 c-<"I -.J)
~ 00 ('l <1' -.J) <1'
c-<"I 0 .::t .... ('l
~ oS c-<"I -.J) .... ('l -.J)
~ ~
.. .. 00
c-<"I .::t
~ a c-<"I ('l
~ 'i
..n
)" ~
~ '8
'ia
~ ~ s
';) l/l "g, 0
-0 .0- S l/l 0
c. 2. ~ +" +" '"
~ 0 .... ~ ~
,..l (.) 0 '=' 00
'" ,.. ,..
rJl ~ ~ ~ c.
'8 oS ....
.... .... +"
~ ~ S +" +" ~
.... l/l l/l
.... ~ +" ~
...... ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~
...... '" et-
a :x:. :x:. :x:. ,..l
-~----~--~
,- ,--------------~
~ ABLE III
SOUTHERN PARCEL PARKING DEMAND USING ITEfULI GENERATION
SHARED PARKINS ANALYSIS - WEEKDAY
JOB NU"BER: 4677.01
JOB NAME: CATALINA CENTRE
DATE: JUL Y 27. 1988
HOTEL
------------------------------------------
OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB SUEST ROOM REST/LOUNGE CONFERENCE ROO" TOTAL
PEAK DE"AND: 83 0 50 63 177 7b 148 597
HOUR OF THE DAY
6:00IUI. 2 0 0 32 177 15 0 226
7:00 A.M. 17 0 32 150 15 0 215
8:00 A.lt 52 0 3 32 115 15 74 291
9:00 A.I'\. 77 0 5 32 97 15 148 374
1(>:00 A.". 83 0 10 32 80 15 148 367
11:00 A.". 83 0 15 32 6" 23 148 362
L
12:00 NOON 75 0 25 32 53 38 148 370
1:00 P.M. 75 0 35 32 53 53 148 396
2:00 P.M. 81 0 30 3"1 62 46 148 398
_L
3:00 P.M. 77 0 30 32 62 42 148 390
4:00 P.M. 64 0 25 44 80 38 148 399
5:00 P.I'\. 39 0 35 63 106 53 148 444
6:00 P.". 19 0 45 63 124 6B 148 467
7:00 P.". 6 0 50 63 133 7b 148 476
8:00 P.M. 6 0 50 63 159 76 148 502
9:00 P.M. 2 0 50 63 16S 76 148 50B
10:00 P.I'\. 2 0 45 44 177 68 74 411
11:00 P.M. 0 0 ..~ 32 177 53 0 297
.hJ
12:00 MIDNISHT 0 0 25 32 177 38 0 272
TABLE IV
SOUTHERN PARCEL PARKING DEIIAND USING BOYNTON BEACH GENERATION
SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS - WEEKDAV
JOB NU~BER: 4677.01
JOB NAI'IE: CATALINA CENTRE
DATE: JULV 27, 1988
HOTEL
------------------------------------------
OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB GUEST ROOII RESTiLOUN6E CONFERENCE ROOII TOTAL
PEAK OEIIAND: 112 0 87 63 221 126 74 &83
HOUR OF THE DAY
6:00 A.II. 3 0 0 32 221 25 0 281
7:00 A.II. 22 0 2 32 188 25 0 269
8:00 A.II. 71 0 4 32 144 25 37 312
9:00 A.II. 104 0 9 32 122 25 74 365
10:00 A.II. 112 0 17 32 99 25 74 360
11:00 A.II. 112 0 26 32 77 38 74 359
12:00 NOON 101 0 44 32 66 63 74 379
1:00 P.II. 101 0 61 32 b6 88 74 422
2:00 P.I1. 109 0 52 32 77 76 74 419
3: 00 Ul. 104 0 52 32 77 69 74 409
4:00 P.II. 86 0 44 44 99 63 74 410
5:00 P.II. 53 0 61 63 133 S8 74 471
6:00 P.I1. 26 0 78 63 155 113 74 509
7:00 P.II. 8 0 87 b3 16b 12b 74 524
8:00 P.II. 8 0 87 b3 199 12b 74 557
9:00 P.II. 3 0 87 63 210 12& 74 5b3
10:00 P.II. 3 0 78 44 221 113 37 497
11:00 P.II. 0 0 bl 32 221 88 0 402
12:00 I'IIDNI6HT 0 0 44 32 221 63 0 359
TABLE V
SHARED PARKINS ANALVSIS ITE RATES FOR
RETAIL USE, ULI/ITE RATES FOR OTHER LAND USES
SHARED PARKINS ANALYSIS - WEEKDAV
JOB NUIIBER: 4677.01
JOB NAIIE: CATALINA CENTRE
DATE: JULV 27, 1988
HOTEL
------------------------------------------
OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB GUEST ROOII REST/LOUNGE CONFERENCE ROOII TOTAL
PEAK DEMND: 83 476 50 63 177 76 148 1073
HOUR OF THE DAY
6:00 A.II. '1 0 0 32 177 15 0 226
"
7:00 A.II. 17 38 32 150 15 0 253
8:00 A.II. 52 86 7 32 115 15 74 376
.\
9:00 A.II. 77 200 5 32 97 15 148 574
10:00 A.II. 83 324 10 32 80 15 148 691
11:00 A.'t 83 414 15 32 62 23 148 776
12:00 NOON 75 462 25 32 53 38 148 832
1:00 P.lt 75 476 35 32 53 53 148 872
2:00 P.II. 81 462 30 32 62 46 148 859
3:00 P.II. 77 452 30 32 62 42 148 843
4:00 P.II. 64 414 25 44 80 38 148 813
5:00 P.II. 39 376 35 63 106 53 148 820
6:00 P.II. 19 390 45 63 124 68 148 858
7:00 P.II. 6 424 50 63 133 76 148 899
8:00 P.II. 6 414 50 50 159 76 148 904
9:00 P.II. 2 290 50 44 168 76 148 779
10:00 P.II. 2 152 45 32 177 6B 74 551
11:00 P.II. 0 62 35 32 177 53 0 359
12:00 IIIDNI6HT 0 0 25 32 177 38 0 272
TABLE VI
SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS ULI RATES FOR
RETAIL USE, ULI/ITE RATES FOR OTHER LAND USES
SHARED PARKINS ANALYSIS - WEEKDAY
JOB NUI'IBER: 4677.01
JOB NAI'IE: CA T All NA CENTRE
DATE: JULY 27, 1988
HOTEL
------------------------------------------
OFfICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB SUEST ROO" REST/LOUNGE CONFERENCE ROOI'I TOTAL
PEAK DEI'IAND: 83 586 50 63 177 7b 148 1183
HOUR OF THE DAY
6:00 A.I'I. 2 0 0 32 177 15 0 226
7:00 A.". 17 47 32 150 15 0 262
8:00 A.I'I. 52 105 3 32 115 15 74 396
9:00 A.I'I. 77 246 5 32 97 15 148 620
10:00 A.II. 83 398 10 32 80 15 148 766
11:00 A.I'I. 83 510 15 32 62 23 148 872
12:00 NOON 75 568 25 32 53 38 148 939
1: 00 P .1'1. 75 586 35 32 53 53 148 982
2:00 P.I'I. 81 568 30 32 62 46 148 966
3:00 P.I'\. 77 557 30 32 62 42 148 947
4:00 P.I'I. 64 510 25 44 80 38 148 908
5:00 P.". 39 463 35 63 106 53 148 907
6:00 P.M. 19 481 45 63 124 68 148 948
7:00 P.I1. 6 522 50 63 133 76 148 997
8:00 P.I'I. 6 510 50 63 159 76 148 1012
9:00 P.". '1 357 50 63 168 76 148 865
..
10:00 P.I'I. 2 188 45 44 177 68 74 599
11:00 P.I'I. 0 76 35 32 177 53 0 373
12:00 I'IIDNISHT 0 0 25 32 177 38 0 272
...
TABLE VII
SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS USING BOYNTON BEACH GENERATION RATES
ULI RATE USED FOR GUEST ROO~S
SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS - WEEKDAY
JOB NU"BER: 4677.01
JOB NA"E: CATALINA CEtHRE
DATE: JUL Y 27! 1988
HOTEL
------------------------------------------
OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB GUEST ROOII REST/LOUNGE CONFERENCE ROO" TOTAL
PEAK DEI'IAND: 112 732 87 63 177 126 74 1371
HOUR OF THE DAY
6:00 A.". 3 0 0 .') 177 25 0 lj""
..... '.J,
7:00 A.I'I. " 59 2 32 150 25 0 290
....
8:00 A.". 71 132 4 ., 115 ','" 37 415
.... ...J
9:00 A.". 104 307 9 32 97 25 74 648
10:(lO A.". 112 498 17 32 80 25 74 838
11:00 A.I'I. 112 637 26 32 62 38 74 980
12:00 NOON 101 710 44 32 53 63 74 1076
1:00 P .11. 101 732 61 32 53 88 74 1141
2:00 P.II. 109 710 52 32 62 76 74 1114
3:00 P.". 104 695 52 32 62 69 74 1089
4:00 P.". 86 637 44 44 BO 63 74 1027
5:00 P.II. 53 578 61 63 106 88 74 1023
6:00 P.l'l. 26 600 7B 63 124 113 74 1079
7:00 P.II. 8 651 87 63 133 126 74 1142
B:OO P.". B 637 87 63 159 126 74 1154
9:00 P.II. 3 447 87 63 168 126 74 968
10:00 P.II. 3 23-4 7B 44 177 113 37 687
11:00 P.II. 0 95 61 32 177 aa 0 453
12: 00 IIIDNIGHT 0 0 44 32 177 63 0 315
.... '----'
.
..
Kim/ey-Horn and AssociatesJ Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive. West Palm Beach, FL33407 .(407)845-0665
Raleigh. Charlotte. Nashville. Virginia Beach. Washington. Dallas. Phoenix.
West Palm Beach. Tampa, Orlando. Fl Lauderdale. Vera Beach. Fl Myers
May 16, 1988
Revised June 30, 1988
4677.01 (07)P87 -55
Ms. Tambri Heyden
City of Boynton Beach
120 NE Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435
Re: Catalina Center/Study
Revised to Include Gerulaitis Resort
Dear Ms. Heyden:
As requested, we have revised the parking analysis for Catalina Center
located in Boynton Beach, Florida. This revision is a comprehensive document
which includes a reduction of the amount of office square footage and the addition
of a Gerulaitis Resort (health club/tennis center) along with all previous changes to
the site, with the exception of the exclusion of the McDonald's outparcel. The
McDonald's outparcel was not included at the City's request. As a result of the
difference in parking peak characteristics of the exchanged land uses (office to
health club), the demand at the Catalina Center peaks at 1:00 PM and '8:00 PM.
These peaking characteristics are reflected in the tables and buffer calculations.
The analysis was based on the City of Boynton Beach parking code; parking
generation rates recommended by the Urban Land Institute (ULI), ULI--the Urban
Land Institute Shared Parking, 1983; parking generation rates recommended by the
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Parking Generation--An Interim
Report, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1985; and the shared parking
recommendations of the Urban Land Institute, ULI--The Urban Land Institute
Shared Parking, 1983. All rates used in this analysis represent peak season demand.
Differences in seasonal peaks which exist among the land uses proposed were
conservatively ignored.
Shared parking is an integral part of the Catalina Center analysis. Shared
parking is defined as parking space which can be used by two or more land uses
without conflict or encroachment. In order for shared parking to be utilized, the
peak accumulation of parked vehicles generated by different but adjacent land uses
must not be concurrent.
Building client relationships since 1967
"-
'-
,
ii' --,
I rro /, IIJJ
" L0,[[T;DL/@r;Ja!JJGfl[jf1
I
I
I
r-
I
I
I
Ms. Tambri Heyden
-2-
May 16, 1988
Revised June 30, 1988
Catalina Center will consist of four land uses: office, retail, health club with
ancillary facilities, and hotel with restaurant, lounge, and conference facilities
contained within the hotel. Considering the land use mix, maximum parking
accumulation will occur on weekdays.
An analysis has been made, of the northern parcel, which contains 14-6,325
square feet of retail space, and the southern parcel, which contains 33,338 square
feet of office, 24-,608 square feet of health facilities, and a l66-room hotel with its
auxiliary uses including 18 suites. The north and south parcels were analyzed
separately and combined. The analysis was based on information provided by
Ocean Properties, on the January 21, 1985, site plan of the total development, the
August 27, 1986, site plan of the retail parcel, information provided verbally in
August, 1987, the outparcel site plan of December 28, 1987, and supplemental
information provided in 1988.
Our analysis demonstrates that the proposed parking will be sufficient to
accommodate the parking demands of both the northern and southern parcels,
whether they are considered individually or together.
Northern Parcel
ULI and ITE are the most widely recognized sources of parking generation data.
For a retail development of the size of Catalina Center, ULI recommends'a rate of
four spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area. This would indicate that
586 spaces should be provided for the northern parcel. ITE recommends a weekday
parking rate for peak season (Thanksgiving to Christmas) of 3.25 spaces per 1000
square feet of gross leasable area, which would require Catalina Center to provide
476 spaces for the retail parcel. As per the approved retail s1 te plan, a total of
692 spaceS are proposed for the retail parcel, 106 (18.1%) more than required by
ULI rates and 216 (45.4-%) more than indicated by the rrE peak season rates.
The Boynton Beach parking code, for retail use, is generalized to accommodate all
shopping center sizes. The code requires five parking spaces per 1,000 square feet
of gross leasable area. According to ULI, this is a rate appropriately applied to
retail developments greater than 600,000 square feet, over four times the size of
the proposed Catalina Center retail parcel. Under the Boynton Beach parking
code, the Catalina Center retail parcel would be required to provide 732 parking
spaces.
,
)
4677.01(07)P87-55
.Ie
=-,
I
,
'1 r'~R~,,7 0 ",., ,~.F, ~,"'"
! I L~LLiJJU@UOUL(QUfJD
Ms. Tambri Heyden
-3-
May 16, 1988
Revised June 30, 1988
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
Southern Parcel
Given the hotel/office/health club/restaurant land use mix proposed for the
southern parcel, it is reasonable to assume that shared parking will occur within
the parcel itself. Analysis of the site plan shows that numerous parking spaces
wi thin the parcel are convenient to the four land uses which will allow shared
parking to occur.
The nature and location of the health club suggests that many of the patrons of the
club will be office employees, hotel guests, residents of the adjacent Catalina Club
and users of more than one use in the club. These factors permit a reduction in the
parking provided. The 41 spaces internal to the health club at the peak demand
represent 3% of the vehicles using a parking space on site. These vehicles have a
primary trip purpose at one of the other uses on site (hotel, office, retaH).
According to personnel at local health club facilities, the majority of trips to a
health club are secondary trips; therefore, a 50% rate was used. The swimming
pool and outdoor courts are expected to generate demands entirely from the other
uses on site. Therefore, a 100 percent internal capture was applied to these uses.
Table I (attached) outlines the parking demand which can be expected for the
southern parcel using ITE and/or ULI generation rates. As shown in Table 1,
without considering shared parking, 575 parking spaces are required under ITE/ULI
recommendations.
i
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
i
Compared to ITE and ULI, the Boynton Beach parking code is more conservative
for office, hotel, and restaurant/lounge land use, but requires fewer spaces for
conference facilities. Parking demand for the southern parcel generated using the
Boynton Beach parking code is shown in Table 2 (attached). As shown, without
conside'ring shared parking, the Boynton Beach code would require 657 spaces to be
provided for the southern parcel.
As previously stated, the physical layout and mixed-use character of the southern
parcel lends itself to shared parking. Table 3 (attached) shows the peak parking
demand projected for Catalina Center's southern parcel using the generation rates
recommended by ITE/ULI, and considering the shared parking recommendations of
ULI. As seen, 486 spaces are required to meet the peak parking demand, well
below the 586 proposed for the site. Table 4 (attached) shows the peak parking
demand for the southern parcel using Boynton Beach rates for parking generation,
and ULI recommendations for shared parking. As seen, under these criteria, peak
parking demand will be 537 spaces. The 586 spaces proposed represents a projected
surplus of 49 spaces.
i
.J
4677 .OH07)P87-55
. I [1,/70 ...... r-ur
l ~~D{7f!DU@fj'c:hj@[J'[JiJ
(-
I
Ms. Tambri Heyden
-~-
May 16, 1988
Revised June 30, 1988
Based on the above analysis, parking proposed for the southern parcel of Catalina
Center should prove sufficient to handling its parking needs.
Total Development
Given the mixed-use character and physical layout of the Catalina Center site, the
most reasonable approach for analysis of the total development is through use of
ULI shared parking recommendations. A total of 1,278 parking spaces are proposed
for the development.
Projected parking demand for the total site using ULI's shared parking
recommendations are shown in Tables 5, 6, and 7 (attached). Tables 5 and 6 use the
ITE/ULI parking generation rates applied in Table 2 for land uses other than retail.
Table 5 uses the peak season rates for retail generation, and Table 6 uses ULI rates
for retail generation. Based on discussions with Boynton Beach City staff, as the
various hotel components are being evaluated separately, the ULI rate of 1.0 space
per hotel room and the ULI residential rate of 1.6 for the hotel suites is the
appropriate parking generation rate to be used in the analysis. Table 7 reflects this
rate for the hotel room and suite generation and Boynton Beach code rates for all
other uses.
As shown, considering shared parking, the number of parking spaces recommended
for Catalina Center ranges from 886 to 1,128 depending on the generation rate
selected. It should be noted that in all the above scenarios, except where the
Boynton codes are applied to each land use, sufficient parking space is provided on
site even without considering shared parking. For the remainder of this analysis,
the more conservative Boynton Beach rates reflected in Table 7 will be applied.
The City of Boynton Beach requires that a 10% buffer be provided to ensure that a
sufficient number of parking spaces are available at the time of peak use. Based
on consultation with City of Boynton Beach staff, and analysis of the layout of the
total site plan, it will be conservatively assumed that the retail and the office uses
share only from the available hotel parking of ~32 spaces. The restaurant
outparcel may share from the hotel or retail. Also, due to the layout of the site
which is not especially conducive to shared parking between.. the retail or
restaurant and office uses, buffer calculations have been performed separately for
retail, restaurant outparcel and office uses.
By Boynton Beach code, the buffer is calculated as follows:
Buffer = Surplus Shared Parking
On-Site + Shared Parking Provided
I
I
'-------~--
j
4677.0H07)P87-55
(~---ll
II L~;;<~np,\V7, 'LI7=fl= j
I' 1\~UL/lfUu"'-~U[JLrVI...Q) uu
,L__
'\
I
I
i
Ms. Tambri Heyden
-5-
May 16, 1988
Revised June 30, 1988
The peak hours of parking demand for the site are 1:00 PM and 8:00 PM as shown
on Table 7. At 8:00, the hotel usage will require 359 spaces of the 432 provided
leaving 73 spaces available for sharing with the other uses. Neither the retail or
the office/health club will require any shared parking at this time. The
office/health club will use 49 of its 95 spaces, leaving 46 available spaces. The
Marie Callenders restaurant outparcel will need to share 24 spaces to
accommodate its parking code requirement of 83. A surplus of spaces of 73 - 24 =
49 spaces therefore exists for the hotel site, leaving a surplus of 49 + 46 = 95
spaces for the office/health club. The buffer for the office/health club (to three
significant figures) is therefore:
95
95 + 58 x 100 = 62.1%
As calculated above, during the peak hours of parking demand, 73 spaces of the 432
provided for the hotel are available for shared parking. Also as shown, 24 spaces
will be shared at this time by the Marie Callenders outparcelleaving 73 - 24 = 49
spaces available to be shared with the retail. The peak demand of 637 spaces for
the retail has been met by the 692 spaces provided. This leaves a surplus of 692 -
637 = 55 spaces on the retail site. Overall, the surplus for the retail portion is
55 + 49 = 104. The buffer for the retail (to three significant figures) is therefore:
104
692 + 40 x 100 = 14.2%
During the peak hour of parking demand of the site, the demand for spaces at the
Marie Callenders restaurant outparcel will be 100% of its total requirements (83
spaces). Since 59 spaces have been provided for the restaurant, 24 spaces will need
to be shared with the hotel. The buffer for the restaurant outparcel is:
104
59 + 24 = 125.3%
At 1 :00 PM the buffers are also met. The hotel will re'quire 215 of the 432 spaces
provided leaving 217 to share with the other uses on site. The office/health club
will require 120 spaces, therefore needing to share 25 spaces from the hotel. The
retail center will demand 732 spaces, therefore needing to share 40 spaces from
the hotel. Marie Callenders will not require any sharing at 1:00 PM~ Considering
these demands, the surplus shared parking is 217 - 25 - 40 = 152 spaces. The buffer
for the office/health club is:
152
95 + 58 x 100 = 99.3%
)
4677.01(07)P87-55
',-
,I
~ IiCCr:0JO@!jo[JflQ)[J'[;f}
i
I
I...
'1
I
I
Ms. Tambri Heyden
-6-
May 16, 1988
Revised June 30, 1988
The buffer for the retail is:
69i:240 x 100 = 20.8%
The buffer for Marie Callenders is;
152 lOL
59 + 24 x 100 = 183. 70
Although the site demand is similar at 1:00 PM and 8:00 PM, the buffers are
greater at 1:00 since the surplus comes from the hotel. In other words, the entire
surplus is available for the health club and retail.
It is seen that using the Boynton Beach generation rates, both the office and retail
parcels meet the Boynton Beach buffer requirement of 10%.
Based on the above analysis, the 1,278 spaces provided for the total development
should prove sufficient in handllng the parking demands of the development.
If you have any questions regarding this analysis, please do not hesitate to
contact us.
Very truly yours,
for
Steven G. Godfrey, P.E.
Vice President
JFB:SGG:SOR/mec
Attachments
4677 .01 (07)P87-55
i
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
!
~
I~
. ::;=,
~~ I~
v III 0 0 '" N 0 ~I g
1.0 V "" ..... 00 .::I- '"
.- U 00 .::I- .::l- N N '" '" ......
g.ro -I '" Q~
VI/)
0:: ~
c '-====
0 ?? '* ?? ?? * * '* '* '* '*
.-
... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'* U '" 0 0
::l -I .....
-0
V
0::
-~ ,
"" N 0 0 00 '" N 0 .::I- 00
Q o u 00 00 '" -I .::l- N N '" '" .::I-
_ ro -I -I
Z .....
0< Vl
~ en
r.u * * *
Q ...
- * * * C
~ V ...l c c c ro
~ Z u :J 0 0 0 1.0
Z - 1.0 ... ... ... ::l
- ~ ::l .. C C C * * * ro
~ 0 LI.l >. >. >. - - LI.l LI.l LI.l - ...
= I/) 0 0 0 ...l ..J ..J III
= l- I- l- I- V
< < - CO CO CO :J :J - - - :J 1.0
c.. s..
c.. 0
0 Q '+-4
r.u ~
Z = .: . .:
< 0< V ..... ... . ..... ro
- . -+-: ... . . 1.0
LI.l :c ... 0"' 0- E
l.1J ro III 0- -+-: III LI.l
..J I/) I/) 0:: III 0"' 1.0 I-
c:Q ::J 0 0 III 0 . ... ... ... ... -
~ 0 0 0 U ..... ro ro ro ...
0< Q Z ro 0 0 0 '" U C V V V ro ~
I- Z ... V ..... "" C""I ..... 0 ::l III III III V ...
0< I/) c.. - - - - - - - - - III
'" 0 0 0 0 \l) .::I- .::I- .::I- - .c
..J r.u . . . . N N N '" ...
l- N ..... -I -I -I ..... .-
...l < ~
l.1J 0:: '"
U - V
0:: ..J . . . . III III
... ... ... ... E III III III III III ::l
< :J ..... ..... ..... ..... ... ... ... ... ...
c.. ....... ... . . . . 0 ..... ro ro ro ro III
l.1J .- 0- 0- 0- 0"' 0 C V V V V ...
C
'Z I- III III III III III 1.0 ::l III III III III ro
C
= - V 00 00 0 0 00 00 0 ...... '" \0 1.0
l.1J ... "" 0 0 0 .::I- '" 0 N '" ::l
C "" \0 ...... .::l- N N N ro
:I: - -I ...
.. .. III
I- "" .::l- N .::I- ~
:J "" N -I
0 -I
V
I/) ...
- 0
- .c
t3 s..
1.0 0
ro '+-4
V 0.. III
III ... c
:J ::l E 0
0 .-
... III - 0 ... . ,
-0 ~ 1.0 E III 0..
C ::l ::l V ... ... 0 E
ro 0 0 ... 0::
..... .- C C ::l
...l U U 0 ::l ro ro ~
0:: I/) 1.0 1.0 ao
V .c III ::l ::l V C ro
... .- - ..... ro ro ao .-
u ..... ..... C V V ... ... C ... -
..... V ...l
'+-4 ro 0 c ... ... III III ::l
..... V 0 V 0 0 V V 0 V :J
0 :I: c.. I- J: :I: 0:: c::: ...l ::E *
CJ
Z
-
o ~
z ~
< <
::E a-
u.I Q
o u.I
~
CJ <
z :c
- II)
~ 0
~ Z
a-
o
z
N <
u.I u.I
..J II)
c:Q ::>
< Q
l- Z
<
..l
...J
u.I
U
~
~
Z
~
u.I
:c
l-
::J
o
II)
..
II)
u.I
l-
<
~
u.I
o
o
u
CJ
Z
-
~
~
<
a-
:c
u
<:
u.I
cQ
Z
o
l-
Z
>-
o
cQ
"O~
o Vl
~ 0
..... U
5-1ll
OV)
a:::
c
o
.....
+-'
*g
"0
o
Ct::
.... ~Vl
o U
.....Ill
......
V)
(I
i~
Ig
Ii
I o~
~
N - 0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~
- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
- - ~
* * * * * * * * * *
0000000 000
~ 0 0
- -
N N 0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~
- ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
- -
o
+-'
III
Ct::
"0
C
III
E
o
Cl
<:
u..
(,)
c
.....
~
~
III
0..
.
+-'
"1
0"
Vl
o
o
q
-
-
~
~
.
+-'
....
0-
Vl
o
o
~
. -
('f"\ ..-..t ~ ......
~
."1
+-' 0"
.... Vl
0-
Vl 0
o
o ~
~ -
- -
o 0
+-'
.....
Vl
C
o
+-'
C
-
. . . . V')
.:::: .t: .:::: .:::: E
. . . . 0
0" 0" 0" 0" 0
VlVlVlVl~
~ ~ 0 0 ~
~ooo~
~~~.:r-
~ ~
~ ~ N .:::t-
~ N -
o
Vl
;:)
"0
C
III
...J
..0
.2
u
o ..c
u +-'
;;: ra
.... 0
o :I:
Vl
+-' Vl
~ E
::::I 0
o 0
U Ct::
Vl
..... -
_ C 0
o C +-'
000
0.. I- :I:
E
o
o
~ +-'
- .....
~ C
N ::::I
. -
- N
Vl Vl Vl
+-' +-' +-'
III III III Vl
Q) 0 0 +-'
Vl Vl Vl III
~ ~ ~ ~
N N N .:r
- - --
....., ~ ..... .....
Vl Vl
+-' +-'
..... III
C 0
::::I Vl
~ ~ 0 ~ '-0
-N~O~
N N N
Vl
+-'
III
Q)
Vl
Vl
+-'
III
Q)
Vl
-
Q)
u
~
III
0-
+-'
::l
o
-
Vl
+-'
III
~
TABLE III
SOUTHERN PARCEL PARKING DEPlAND USING ItE/ULI GENERATION
SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS - WEEKDAY
JOB NUPlBER: 4b77.02
JOB NAKE: CATALINA CENTER
DATE: JUNE 30, 1988
HOTEL
------------------------------------------
OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB GUEST ROOM REST/LOUNGE CONFERENCE ROOP! TOTAL
PEAK DEI1AND: 83 0 50 41 177 7b 148 575
HOUR OF THE DAY
b:OO A. PI. 2 0 0 21 177 15 0 215
7:00 A.M. 17 0 21 150 15 0 204
8:00 A.I'!. 52 0 3 21 115 15 74 280
9:00 A.". 77 0 5 21 97 15 148 363
10:00 A. PI. 83 0 10 21 80 15 148 35b
11:00 A.M. 83 0 15 21 b2 23 148 351
12:00 NOON 75 0 2S 21 53 38 148 359
1:00 P.M. 75 0 3S 21 53 53 U8 385
2:00 P.I1. 81 0 30 21 b2 4b 148 387
3:00 P.I'!. 77 0 30 21 b2 42 148 379
4:00 P.K. 64 0 25 29 80 38 148 383
5:00 P.". 39 0 35 41 lOb 53 148 422
6:00 P.K. 19 0 45 41 124 68 148 445
7:00 P.K. 6 0 50 41 133 7b 148 454
8:00 P.". b 0 50 41 159 7b 148 480
9:00 P.". 2 0 50 41 168 76 148 48b
10:00 P.". 2 0 45 29 177 68 ].4 396
11:00 P.". 0 0 35 21 177 53 0 286
12:00 "IDNIGHT 0 0 25 21 177 38 0 2bl
TABLE IV
SOUTHERN PARCEL PARKING DEMAND USING BOYNTON BEACH GENERATION
SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS - WEEKDAY
JOB NU"BER: 4677 .02
JOB HAilE: CATALINA CENTER
DATE: JUNE 30, 19B8
HOTEL
------------------------------------------
OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB GUEST RODIl REST/LOUNGE CONFERENCE ROOIl TOTAL
PEAK DEIlAND: 112 0 B3 41 221 126 74 657
HOUR OF THE DAY
6:00 A.H. 3 0 0 21 221 25 0 270
7:00 A.H. 22 0 2 21 lB8 25.. 0 25B
B:OO A.Il. 71 0 -4 21 144 25 37 301
9:00 A.If. 104 0 8 21 122 25 74 354
10: 00 A. Il. 112 0 17 21 99 25 74 34B
11: 00 A. H. 112 0 25 21 77 38 74 347
12:00 NOON 101 0 42 21 66 63 74 3116
1:00 P.Il. 101 0 58 21 66 88 74 408
2:00 P."'. 109 0 50 21 77 76 74 406
3:00 P.H. 104 0 50 21 77 69 74 395
4:00 P.Il. 86 0 42 29 99 63 74 393
5:00 P.Il. 53 0 58 41 133 88 74 447
6:00 P.H. 26 0 75 41 155 113 74 494
7:00 P.Il. B 0 83 41 166 126 74 498
8:00 P.". 8 0 83 41 199 126 74 531
9:00 P.". 3 0 83 41 210 126 74 537
10:00 P.H. 3 0 75 29 221 113 37 478
11:00 P.H. 0 0 58 21 221 BB 0 388
12:00 "IDNIGHT 0 0 42 21 221 63 0 346
TABLE V
SHARED PARKINS ANALYSIS ITE RATES FOR
RETAIL USE, ULI/ITE RATES FOR OTHER LAND USES
SHARED PARKINS ANALYSIS - WEEKDAY
JOB NUI'IBER: 4677.02
JOB NAI'IE: CATALINA CENTER
DATE: JUNE 30, 1988
HOTEL
------------------------------------------
OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB SUEST ROOII REST/LOUNGE CDNFERENCE ROOI'I TOTAL
PEAK DEIIAHD: 83 47& 50 41 117. 76 148 1051
HOUR OF THE DAY
6:00 A.I!. 2 0 0 21 177 IS 0 215
7:00 A.I'I. 17 38 21 150 15 0 242
8:00 A.II. 52 8& 3 21 115 15 74 365
9:00 A.II. 77 200 5 21 97 IS 148 503
10:00 A.II. 83 324 10 21 80 15 148 b90
11:00 A.". 83 414 15 21 62 23 148 7&5
12:00 NOON 75 462 25 21 S3 38 148 821
1: 00 P. II. 75 476 35 21 S3 53 148 861
2:00 P.". 81 462 30 21 62 46 149 848
3:00 P.". 77 4S2 30 21 62 42 148 932
4:00 P.". 64 414 25 29 SO 38 14S 797
5:00 P.". 39 376 35 41 106 53 148 798
b:OO P.". 19 390 45 41 124 bS 148 836
7:00 P.". 6 424 SO 41 133 76 148 877
8:00 P.Il. 6 414 SO 33 159 76 .. 148 B86
9:00 P.Il. 2 290 50 29 16S 76 148 764
10:00 P.Il. 2 152 45 21 177 68 74 540
11:00 P.Il. 0 62 3S 21 177 53 0 348
12: 00 IUDNIGHT 0 0 2S 21 177 38 0 261
, r
TABLE VI
SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS ULl RATES FOR
RETAIL USE, ULI/ITE RATES FOR OTHER LAND USES
SHARED PARKINS ANALYSIS - ~EEKDAY
JOB NU"9ER: 4677.02
JOB NAIlE: CATALINA CENTER
DATE: JUNE 30, 1998
HOTEL
------------------------------------------
OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB GUEST ROOK REST/LOUNGE CONFERENCE RODI! TOTAL
PEAl< DE/lAMD: 83 586 ' SO 41 177 76 148 1161
HOUR OF THE DAY
6:00 A./l. 2 0 0 21 177 15 0 215
7:00 A./l. 17 47 21 150 15 0 251
B:OO A./l. 52 105 3 21 115 15 74 3B5
9:00 A./l. 77 246 5 21 97 IS 149 609
10:00 A./l. 83 398 10 21 BO 15 148 755
11: 00 A .11. 83 510 15 21 62 23 148 861
12:00 NOON 75 568 25 21 53 3B 148 928
,
1:00 P./l. 75 586 ~.. 21 53 53 148 971
,h'
2:00 P./l. 81 568 30 21 62 46 148 955
3:00 P.I!. 77 557 30 21 62 42 148 936
4:00 P./l. 64 510 25 29 80 38 148 893
5:00 P.". 39 463 35 41 106 53 148 88S
6:00 P./l. 19 481 45 41 124 68 148 926
7:00 P./l. 0 S22 50 41 133 70 148 975
8:00 P./l. 0 510 50 41 159 7b 148 990
9:00 P./l. '1 357 50 41 168 7b 148 843
..
10:00 P./l. 2 188 45 29 177 68 74 583
11:00 P./l. 0 70 35 21 177 53 0 362
12:00 /lIDNISHT 0 0 25 21 177 38 0 261
, c
l'
..
TABLE VII
SHARED PARKINS ANALYSIS USINS BOYNTON BEACH 6ENERATION RATES
ULI RATE USED FOR SUEST ROO"S
SHARED PARKINS ANALYSIS - WEEKDAY
JOB NUKBER: 4677.02
JOB NAKE: CATALINA CENTER
DATE: JUNE 30, 1988
HOTEL
------------------------------------------
OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB 6UEST ROOK REST/LOUNSE CONFERENCE ROOII TOTAL
PEAK OE"AND: 112 732 ' 83 41 177 12& 74 1345
HOUR OF THE DAY
6:00 A.". 3 0 0 21 177 25 0 226
7:00 A.II. 22 59 2 21 150 25 0 279
8:00 A.tI. 71 132 4 21 115 25 37 404
9:00 A.tI. 104 307 8 21 97 25 74 &37
10:00 A.II. 112 498 17 21 BO 25 74 826
11:00 fl.". 112 637 25 21 62 38 74 968
12:QO NOON 101 710 42 21 53 63 74 1063
1:00 P.". 101 732 58 21 53 88 ].4 1127
2:00 P.". 109 710 50 21 62 76 74 1101
3:00 P.". 104 695 50 21 62 69 ].4 1075
4:00 P.". 86 637 42 29 80 63 74 1010
5:00 P.II. 53 578 sa 41 106 sa 74 998
6:00 P.". 26 600 75 41 124 113 74 1053
7:00 P.II. 8 651 83 41 133 126 ].4 1116
8:00 P.II. 8 637 83 41 159 126 74 1128
9:00 P.". 3 447 83 41 168 126 ].4 942
10:00 P.". 3 234 75 29 177 113 37 668
11:00 P.lt 0 95 58 21 177 88 0 439
,
12:00 "IDNISHT 0 0 42 21 177 63 0 302
r
.....-'!!II#'
,(it- ",r
,...~.(
,:.
Kim/ey-Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive, West Palm Beach, FL33407 .(407) 845-0665
Raleigh. Charlotte, Nashville, Virginia Beach, Washington. Dallas. Phoenix.
West Palm Beach. Tampa. Orlando. Fl Lauderdale, Vera Beach. Fl Myers
May 16, 1988
Revised June 30, 1988
4677.0 I (07)P87 -55
Ms. Tambri Heyden
City of Boynton Beach
120 NE Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435
Re: Catalina Center/Study
Revised to Include Gerulaitis Resort
Dear Ms. Heyden:
As requested, we have revised the parking analysis for Catalina Center
located in Boynton Beach, Florida. This revision is a comprehensive document
which includes a reduction of the amount of office square footage and the addition
of a Gerulaitis Resort (health club/tennis center) along with all previous changes to _IJ..
the site, with the exception of the exclusion of the McDonald's outparcel. The ",.",
McDonald's outparcel was not included at the City's request. As a result of the
difference in parking peak characteristics of the exchanged land use~sof' to
health club), the demand at the Catalina Center peaks at 1:00 PM an : d .
These peaking characteristics are reflected in the tables and buffer calc . s.
The analysis was based on the City of Boynton Beach parking code; parking
generation rates recommended by the Urban Land Institute (ULI), ULI--the Urban
Land Institute Shared Parking, 1983; parking generation rates recommended by the
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Parking Generation--An Interim
Report, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1985; and the shared parking
recommendations Of" Urban Land Institute, ULI-- The Urban Land Institute
Shared Parking, 1983 All rates used in this analysis represent peak season demand.
Differenc~s in. seasona peaks ~hich exist among the land uses i(op,osed were ,,/...
conservatIvely IgnoredJ ~r- ( L-C {vl /-cf Vtct l'- V
Shared parking is an integral part of the Catalina Center analysis. Shared
parking is defined as parking space which can be used by two or more land uses
without conflict or encroachment. In order for shared parking to be utilized, the
peak accumulation of parked vehicles generated by different but adjacent land uses
must not be concurrent.
Building client relationships since 1967
..
....
; ,'/'"C.. -; ," 1'1'
,', r:1~iiClr'vS ''-'/r',M11
" L U-,L;lnJU@~!OU1_l;Iu:;U I
.I_~____.. I)
.
Ms. Tambri Heyden
-2-
May 16, 1988
Revised June 30, 1988
Catalina Center will consist of four land uses: office, retail, health club with
ancillary facilities, and hotel with restaurant, lounge, and conference facilities
contained within the hotel. Considering the land use mix, maximum parking
accumulation will occur on weekdays.
An analysis has been made of the northern parcel, which contains 146,325
square feet of retail space, and the southern parcel, which contains 33,338 square
feet of office, 24,608 square feet of health facilities, and a 166-room hotel with its
auxiliary uses including 18 suites. The north and south parcels were analyzed
separately and combined. The analysis was based on information provided by
Ocean Properties, on the January 21, 1985, site plan of the total development, the
August 27, 1986, site plan of the retail parcel, information provided verbally in
August, 1987, the outparcel site plan of December 28, 1987, and supplemental
information provided in 1988.
Our analysis demonstrates that the proposed parking will be sufficient to
accommodate the parking demands of both the northern and southern parcels,
whether they are considered individually or together.
Northern Parcel
ULI and ITE are the most widely recognized sources of parking generation data.
For a retail development of the size of Catalina Center, ULI recommends a rate of
four spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area. This would indicate that
586 spaces should be provided for the northern parcel. ITE recommends a weekday
parking rate for peak season (Thanksgiving to Christmas) of 3.25 spaces per 1000
square feet of gross leasable area, which would require Catalina Center to provide
~' ,476 spaces for the retail parcel. As per the approved retail site plan, a total of
692 paces are proposed for the retail parcel, . more than required by
&<6' 11 rates and...rf6 (4j.4~) more than indicated by the ITE peak season rates.
~/~ t~'
The Boynton Beach parking code, for retail use, is generalized to accommodate aU
shopping center sizes. The code requires five parking spaces per 1,000 square feet
of gross leasable area. According to ULI, this is a rate appropriately applied to
retail developments greater than 600,000 square feet, over four times the size of
the proposed Catalina Center retail parcel. Under the Boynton Beach parking
code, the Catalina Center retail parcel would be required to provide 732 parking
spaces.
,
I
I
I
i
I
!
)
4677.oH07)P87-55
.
t,.
c,~c i~ 'J" i '
! '.'~CITDU~fJOU-L@(J[!fJ I
--,.-
.
'\
Ms. Tambri Heyden
-3-
May 16, 1988
Revised June 30, 1988
Southern Parcel
Given the hotel/office/health club/restaurant land use mix proposed for the .
southern parcel, it is reasonable to assume that shared parking will occur within !
the parcel itself. Analysis of the site plan shows that numerous parking spaces i
with~n the parcel are convenient to the four land uses which will allow sha~ed' AI,R.# '
parkmg to occur. /1 1 t~. -';1 - TJ,
, . V '" ~ . <J
The nature and loca~ of the health club suggests that many 0 the p trons of the ~P~I )J-l'
club will be office ?fnpl ees, hotel guests, residents of the adj cent Catalina Club ,(vV
and users ofr ore than e use in the club. These factors per Ita reduction in the ~ i '"
parking prj'*i, ed. The 41 paces internal to the health club at the peak demand
{represent' 3 f the ve . les using a parking space on site. These vehicles hav )
....v primary i purpose at one of the other uses on site (hotel, office etail).'
~ ~ According t personnel at local health club facilities, the majority of t . a
All J".fL health club a e secondary trips; therefore, a 2.Q.% rate was used. The swimming
{" ~,' - pool and outdo r courts are . ected to generate demands entirely from the other
-M uses on site. Th efore, a OOrcent internal cap~ure was applied ~o these uses.
otItl' '-'1'D'v1Q JJ ~ k(~t\h. -" k.o ~o( i60L.LL-
: _ Table 1 (attached) outlines the parking deman'd' which tan be expected for the
! ,)J s~uthern par~el .using ITE and/.or ULI gene~ation rates. As ~hown in Table 1,
.-.hl ' wIthout COnSl?enng shared parkmg,~arkmg spaces are reqUired, under ITE/ULI
~, ,! /.~ recommendatIons. 51(Pq'\- (,'1~ ht- ~
.~~ Compared to ITE and ULI, the Boynton Beach parking c~ore conservative
'I for office, hotel, and restaurant/lounge land use, but requires fewer spaces for
i conference facilities. Parking demand for the southern parcel generated using the i
, Boynton Beach parking code is shown in Table 2 (attached). As shown, without I
considering shared parking, the Boynton Beach code would require~paces to be ~C(q
provided for the southern parcel. 6fi-~ (P5f? fYV'.J:
j ,dJ ' e-n, ;'l..e.A f
As previously stated, the physical layout and mixed-use character of the seuthern ~<..L-
parcel lends itself to shared parking. Table 3 (attached) shows the peak parking i
demand projected for Catalina Center's southern parcel using the generation rates
recommended by ITE!U!oIb and considering the shared parking recommendations of
ULI. As ~n,...4-8f) s~~s are required to meet the peak parking demand, well
below the 8 roposed for the site. Table 4 (attached) shows the peak parking
demand for t e southern parcel using Boynton Beach rates for parking generation,
and ULI recommendations for shared parking. As seen, under these criteria, peak 1
parking demand will be.~aces. The 586 spaces proposed represents a projected !
surplus o!-M' spaces. 579~-nz: " A' /
7 .
6W . ~..
*~ I~
, I
f
$~1
.,~
~fj
~
.~
,~
tt~
~
A~
. 'ifr-
4677 .OH07)P87-55
~
a,
/l
~kd q~ ~~.O/, I.~
~ pJutw,~ ? '
- -t' '--- k?J:. - -Jif ru\.z4 ;:;:r;a~tt
~"~ ' fed.- .~Pc~'~ .bd~
\ ~ '.i:L~ te~ May 16, 1988 i
~ f7' ~oIfrA evised June 30, 1988
I~...,t .
Based on the above analysis, parking proposed for the southern parcel of Catalina
Center should prove sufficient to handling its parking needs.
-------.....
;'1
,'-----
"
I I rv""" t;-' ~. " ,'-Lf7
:: L ,~~LCifDL';1;!r'lC!~ '-u'(Q;[J[]fJ
i ·
Ms. Tambri Heyden
Total Development
Given the mixed-use character and physical layout of the Catalina Center site, the
most reasonable approach for analysis of the tot opment is through use of
ULI shared parking recommendations. A total 1,2 arking spaces are proposed..
for the development. ' ~
Projected parking demand for the total site' ~i~g ULI's shared parking
recommendations are shown in Tables 5, 6, and 7 (attached). Tables 5 and 6 use the
ITE/ULI parking generation rates applied in Table 2 for land uses other than retail.
Table 5 uses the peak season rates for retail generation, and Table 6 uses ULI rates
for retail generation. Based on discussions with Boynton Beach City staff, as the
various hotel components are being evaluated separately, the ULI rate of 1.0 space
per hotel room and the ULI residential rate of 1.6 for the hotel suites is the
appropriate parking generation rate to be used in the analysis. Table 7 reflects this
rate for the hotel room and suite generation and Boynton Beach code rates for all
other uses. ' t1 ~ ~~
As shown, considering shared parkin the ~f~g spaces recommended
for Catalina Center ranges from 886 to 1,128 epending on the generation rate
selected. It should be noted that I above scenarios, except where the
Boynton codes are applied to each land use, sufficient parking space is provided on
site even without considering shared parking. For the remainder of this analysis,
the more conservative Boynton Beach rates reflected in Table 7 will be applied.
The City of Boynton Beach requires that a 10% buffer be provided to ensure that a
sufficient number of parking spaces are available at the time of peak use. Based
on consultation with City of Boynton Beach staff, and analysis of the layout of the
total site plan, it will be conservatively assumed that the retail and the office uses
share only from the available hotel parking of 432 spaces. The restaurant
outparcel may share from the hotel or retail. Also, due to the layout of the site
which is not especially conducive to h re arkin between the retail or
restaurant and .office uses, bu fer calculations have been performed separately for
retail, restaurant outparcel and office uses. _____ i d.. _._ ' i
. nej,<J .".~, ~ A.-' re~lni
By Boynton Beach code, the buffer IS calculated as follows: be.. tJ-l/owe.d r I
Buffer = Surplus Shared Parking
On-Site + Shared Parking Provided
'\
~
4677.oH07)P87-55
...... -
~hA~~aM- ~/:tJt)~
~ ti)A%~ _
-- ~$ ~ 16J- ~ ?s~
.'-//' 1
+-~l'1 ~~ 01./5 / 1-3-:l..~
-4+ ~~i-~ 13;;1.-.1 ~&-k ~
~/1 -~8-4--+ -z.. IS~~
f$li' 01-
~ 'I J.... f.ro4'1 1., F>.is ~ .25%.--d.
'?"Jj-+1-++=k>l'" t)'rO,-4tl'/ 7'. w.{~CJls.sf
'-;::;;j =-1.2.~/~ 16~ 11.!F ...., ~
61 B fo..v{ d frel,f li:JJ;' - ~. _ ~ ~ ~~ =--55.2-
PnnC1(Jt4 /'1 - I
.. ... - "1-~A - ~ 0\;-- .-\- cu.. ~
",t I 'T -'-"'-.:lk-....A DI \ ll~ b3 ::: n5 IOj + ~"L"" 28 -"h'.
~ '7'~ IO~ ~ ,-rt-,?$';:;.-.{/..
~ a;e;- (.~OO" ~17-71.-44;;:1
-f4- .~ 7,;z / "rp~
.-r-;;tl1 ~~~S; ~3~~
-&1 ~~/"tfJ9S-~
/04-
13~~ 11,;L~
~ ,~~--
r .,
~,4/ ~ g>_~6Jt} fhm.
_~*" ~~ I sf ~
--r1'3. ~ ~ 35'7 :... ...,~a.L f3a-
. I Yl.;<I - ,- --
~~
1!f '13 - ;r~
-1t171l/)~=- ~~
51. '1~ %
~~r~!~
fiJ cf,"cm~.
u1 ~5tJ~ r-e1(. + f;?n7{~~
i .. I ~+~
rtl-/,-:;.'~ 6-~~~+- ~3 eW--t-"7o
::3E- 0- - -UV '
- ~ - ,~ ~A.AtJ-t'~
_ ~ ~ ~ 7''7 I ~ J rr-- - ~ -"
~ J~ ~ .361/ +?>cr~
~ ~. =-~efo
IICJ.,.-+ ~?+~
~,..~ 1:'
.
".
-'-~----~1
' ,
: ,V'7 ?_-..__J7 rz 1""",'( ~
I Lj'ul/u 7J!';(j;lI~;o!,J1JCIv!JfJ .
, I ::::U
~-_.-
.,
..
Ms. Tambri Heyden
-6-
May 16, 1988
Revised June 30, 1988
~
I
I
I
I
I
i
i
I
I
The buffer for the retail is: )/
lof- I+,r~"
69~0 x 100 =~
/ The buffer for Marie Callenders is: ~ ~ ../u::t; ~
I!/~ ,f!,.f- ~ ~ .;2<J~ ~ao7JJ
i / ~ xl00~ ~(P"3rf r;J t - . ~
I / 1'7 1.:/,5/.&1 % r 'jDO - 8"7
! / Although the site demand is similar at 1:00 PM and 8:00 PM, the buffers are
I / greater at 1:00 since the surplus comes from the hotel. In other words, the entire
~~ II I surplus is available for the health club and retail,
9'1' '\ It is seen that using the Boynton Beach generation rates, both the office and retail
\, parcels meet the Boynton Beach buffer requirement of 10%.
. 1~1:t.
I Based on the above analysis, the ~8 spaces provided for the total development
should prove sufficient in handling the parking demands of the development.
I
L If you have any questions regarding this analysis, please do not hesitate to
~pntact us.
Very truly yours,
for
Steven G. Godfrey, P.E.
Vice President
JFB:SGG:SOR/mec
Attachments
/
4677.01 (07)P87-55
..
.
':"
'..
,- --~-=---=-----=-n----~II
< r", ~'I,I n '<-.1.'-;:::..", ,,"""'-'"
: L '':'L,/l,.,U10JU@)j'oU1.kJ.I1UUJ
L~__ I
~.
~-~
1
!
I
i
o
rv/:
Ms. Tambri Heyden ~ {}D -~y
t/J( \ \ ·
i ~\dl, / ~ ~0 t.L--/
:J : ~ The peak hours of parking demand for the si te are I :00 PM and 8:00 PM ~~wg. j
I on Table 7 ~tB:OO, the hotel usage will require 359 spaces of the ~de~- ·
_~, CfL/ leaving ~ck~available for sharing with the other uses.' '.
OJj3 ~ .' . ., .' . . The
, office/health club will us@', 0 1 95 spaces, leaving ~abl,~e s ~~sss. The
Marie Callenders restaurant outpareel will ~eed to share ..f<?!f)itJtlices t~
accommodate its parking code requirement of~~ fA surplus of spaces ~ -~ =
.......-~spaces therefore exists for the hotel site, l~aving a surplus of..,.. ~ -.-J-l'd.5
~a~es for the office/health club. The buffer for the office/health club (to three
I fy significant figures) is therefore: - ,
'/ ,/ ',I rks c:-., 0/ ' a
: 11 _ )1AIPII?', _:', 31,W.
- 4-;%. 95 + x ~O , .
k 11 -/i#~_' ~J ~ ' ~
v:>j -/-Pr qi:j _' '~,;o ~ :(/
As calculated above, dunn he k hou~f parking demand, 3 spaces of the 432.
provided for the hotel are available. for shared parking. Also as shown,~~aces
will be shared at this time by the Marie Callenders outparcelleaving 73 -~ JPr'W
spaces available to be shared with 1bSl retail. The peak demand of 637 space~ J_Q.r
the retail has been met by the ~~ces provided. This leaves a surplus of...8'Jf' -
637 = .M~paces on the retail site. Overall, the surplus for the retail portion is
>>' + 49 = 104. The buffer for the retail (to three significant figures) is therefore:
51-r-+G =-Cftp ~(, 13..11%
692 + 40 x 100 = ~
-5-
May 16, 1988
Revised June 30, 1988
t5, .,,+~
PeA
~
-H:J1f"f5"
~ -..l2j6~.;)-t1/~
g-1 '
/-
At 1:00 PM the buffers are also met. The hotel will require 215 of the 432 spaces
provided lea~i!,.8 217 to share with the other uses on, sj~t~. The office/health club
will require ~ $ces, therefore needing to share ~;f~p~ces. from the hotel. The
retail center will demand 732 spaces, therefore neeCling to share 40 spaces from
the hotel. Marie Callenders will not require any sharing at 1:00 PM. Considering
these demands, the surplus shared parking is 217 - 2~ - 40 = 152 spaces. The buffer
for the office/health club is:' . .
...J...5.2-1 0 4- ';211 -" q -- 44- -=-- 10 f-
~xl00=~
J1t 5'1.10/0
\
\
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
!
i
i
I
-I
J
I
I
I
I
I
: I
~
I
I
i
I
I
i
,
~
During the pea~-pafKTng-de~-~nd--~fthe5rte',.:t e demand for spaces at :~
Marie Callenders restaurant outparcel will be 100% of its al re uirements JilSJ~1
spaces). Since 59 spaces have been provided for the restaurant, ces will need
to be shared with the hotel. The buffer for the restaurant outparcel is. aJ;'f;UO
4677.01(07)P87-55
.,
.-
.", -
.
rr ~ i
I' 0
Ii SJ '
I '-6'
I ~I
~;
I~
\~
,r-'
oi:'5
I ts
~, ~
o 0 0 --....." ~
~
lJ)
t-
-~ l""I 00 C7'\ N 0 .::t- oo -
Q o u 00 .::to N N "'" "'" .::t- ,~
,.... cO -c -c
Z .....
< V'l
:s .
l.LJ * * * CIl
....
Q - * * * c:
() 4) ....l c: c: c: cO
() Z u :J 0 0 0 1..
Z 1.. .... .... .... ='
- =' ... c: c: c: * * * cO
- ~
~ 0 U.l >. >. >. - - U.l U.l U.l - ....
= V'l 0 0 0 ....l ,...J ....l CIl
= l- I- l- I- 4)
< < - r:!l r:!l co :J ~ - - - ~ 1..
c.. 1..
c.. 0
Q Q ....
Z l.LJ . ..; 4)
= .... +-,
< < 4) "1 ..; . .... cO
- 0- . 1..
l.LJ :c .... 0- "1 .... E
l.LJ cO CIl 0- "1 CIl U.l
a V'l II) 0::: CIl 0- 1.. I-
;:) 0 0 CIl 0 . .... .... .... .... -
.:::t 0 0 0 u ..... cO cO cO ....
< Q Z cO 0 0 0 "'" u c: 4) Q) Q) cO 4)
.r::
I- Z .. 4) ..... l""I l""I -c 0 =' CIl CIl CIl 4) ....
c.. - - - - - - - - - CIl
< V'l "'" 0 0 0 0 \J) .::t- .::t- .::t- - .r::
..J l.LJ . . . . N N N It'\ ....
.... N -c -c -c -c ..... .....
..J < ~
l.LJ = "0
U - 4)
= ....l . . . . CIl CIl
.... .... .... .... E CIl CIl CIl CIl CIl ='
< ::> .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... CIl
c.. - .... . . . . 0 ..... cO cO cO cO ....
l.LJ ..... 0- 0- 0- 0- 0 c: Q) 4) 4) 4) c:
Z CIl CIl CIl CIl CIl 1.. =' CIl CIl CIl CIl
.... c: cO
L.
= - 4) 00 00 0 0 00 00 0 r--. It'\ \J) ='
l.LJ .... l""I 0 0 0 .::t- -c C7'\ 0 N C7'\ cO
:c c: l""I \J) r--. .::to -c N N N ....
- ... CIl
.... l""I .::t- N .::to 4)
::> l""I N -c 1..
0 -c
4)
V'l ....
- 0
-c .r::
4) L.
U 0
1.. ....
cO
Q) 0- CIl
.... c:
CIl =' 0
:J 0 E .... .....
....
"0 .... CIl CIl - 0 0-
..0 L. E
c: =' =' 4) .... .... 0 E
cO -c 0 0 .... c: c: 0::: ='
....l U 0 .....
u =' cO cO CIl
0::: V'l 1.. L. 00 CIl
4) .r:: CIl =' =' Q) c: cO
I .... .- -c ..... cO cO 00 .....
u .... -
..... ..... '0 c: Q) 4) .... .... c: Q) ,...J
.... cO c: .... .... CIl CIl ='
.... Q) 0 4) 0 0 4) Q) 0 4) :J
l 0 :c a.. l- t: ! 0::: 0::: ....l ~ *
1 \ I j
l
<.., ~'o ~.
I) c:> . \
?: ~,~ #\i ~
0 ~ ~~\~ '^ -.D <:)
~ <- -~~ g() c"\ a--
c.. o (,) ....
~ .....co ,
'8 ~ .....
rJl \
I) ~ I
..( ~ ,
?: ~ ~ ~ \
~ 0 cO --.::> \
.c '%. p!. .; .; \
....
-0 . .... .- ~ \
c.. .. t1' .
~ ~ ~ g- I
0 IJ'/ . .... IJ'/ IJ'/ ~ ()O \
E <:) ~ 0- E ~ ~
~ ~ <:) .... cO (1) \
Q) 0- IJ'/ <:) 0 Q)
<:) <:) 0 ~ ~ \
C"l ct. 0 ~ IJ'/ ~~
IJ'/ <:) \1"\ "" ~
~ ....
~ - <:) c"\ .... - .... \1"\ \1"\
'8 c c"\ <:) - - \1"\ ~ . N t~
':) .... c"\ c"\ <:) <:) ~ ~ - -
~ ;;:t. . . . - - A --
8 . - .... <" .... -'
~ ~ c"\ .... .... ....
cO
"'" 0.. ~~0
..( I) ~
..J ?:
\ti ~ . . . . IJ'/ IJ'/ ~
() .c ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ J -%-
~ .... .... .... .... 0 .... cO cO
c.. ~ . . . . ~ ~ Q)
.... t1' t1' t1' t1' 0 IJ'/
c.. ~ IJ'/ IJ'/ IJ'/ IJ'/ IJ'/ ~ ~ ~
c
~ ~ g() <:) <:) g() g() \1"\
~ g() <:) <:) =- .... ~
c"\ <:)
~ .s c"\ -.D t- =- .... ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~
c"\ =- <" =- C>-
a c"\ <" .... \
"'" \
~ 'i
rJl -::: ~~
b I
8
c:Q ~
~ ~ E
:3
? IJ'/ IJ'/ S 0
~ IJ'/ 0
-0 ./:). ~ E ~ ~ ~ ct.
~ ;? 0 0 .... c ~
U U 0 :3 cO 00
.-1 p!. rJl ~ ~
~ ~ ~ c
-s IJ'/ ....
~ .... .... ~
.... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q)
<a ..... ~
.... 0 ~ ~ ~
.... 0 0 0
.... ~ 0 Q) , :r. .-1
0 0.. r- \ l
\ \
=-\t-
t- \1"\
-.D
"4'
.
----------
~
.
TABLE II I
SOUTHERN PARCEL PARkING DE"AND USING I~E/ULI GENERATION
SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS - WEEKDAY
JOB NU"'BER: 4677.02
JOB NAI1E: CATALINA CENTER
DATE: JUNE 30, 1988
HOTEL
------------------------------------------
OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH ~UEST ROOH REST/LOUNGE CONFERENCE ROO" TOTAL ~~f
PEAK DEI'IAND: 83 0 SO 177 76 148~
~ fY2
HOUR OF THE DAY ftr
~3
6:00 A.". 2 0 0 21 177 15 0 215
7:00 A.". 17 0 21 150 15 0 204
8:00 A.I1, 52 0 3 21 115 15 74 280
9: 00 A,I'I. 77 0 5 21 97 15 148 363
10:00 A,". ~ 0 10 21 80 15 148 356
,83 ' .
11:00 A,", 0 15 21 62 23 148 351
12:00 NOON 75 0 25 21 53 . 38 148 359
I
1:00 P,I'I. 75 0 35 21 "'" 53 148 I 385
. .J,) \ 387
2:00 P.M. 81 0 30 21 62 46 148
I
3:00 P.", 77 0 30 21 62 42 148 I 379
4:00 P."'. 64 0 25 29 80 38 148 383
5:00 P.M. 39 0 35 41 lOb 53 48 422
6:00 P.I'!. 19 0 45 41 124 b8 148 445
7:00 P.I'!. 6 0 SO 41 133 7b 148 454
8:00 P.II. 0 0 SO :\ 41 159 7b 148 480
9:00 P.". 2 0 SO I ) 168 76 148 ~'~h
\ 41
"-
10:00 P."', 2 0 45 29 07~ 68 74 3% 52
11:00 P.", 0 0 35 21 177 53 0 286
12:00 I'!IDNIGHT 0 0 25 21 ~V 38 0 261
.
f
.
TABLE IV
SOUTHERN PARCEL PARKING DEKAND USING BOYNTON BEACH GENERATION
SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS - NEEKDAY
JOB NU"BER: 4077.02
JOB NAKE: CATALINA CENTER
DATE: JUNE 30, 198B
HOTEL
------------------------------------------
OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB GUEST ROO" REST/LOUNGE CONFERENCE ROOI'! TOTAL
PEAK DE"AND: 112 0 83 ~ 221 126 74 ~~
~ d
HOUR OF THE DAY b~q
6:00 A.". 3 0 0 21 221 25 0 270
7:00 A.". 22 0 2 21 188 25 0 258
8:00 A.". 71 0 4 21 144 25 37 301
9:00 A.I'!. 104 0 8 21 122 25 74 354
10:00 A.". 112 0 17 21 99 25 74 348
11:00 A.". 112 0 25 21 77 38 74 347
12:00 NOON 101 0 42 21 b6 63 74 366
1 : 00 P. K . 101 0 58 21 66 88 74 408
2:00 P.I'\. 109 0 50 21 77 76 74 406
3:00 P.K. 104 0 50 21 77 69 74 395
4:00 P.". 86 0 42 29 99 63 74 393
5:00 P.I'!. 53 0 58 41 133 88 74 447
b:OO P.". 26 0 75 41 155 113 74 484
7:00 P.". 8 0 83 41 1b6 120 74 498
8:00 P.". 8 0 83 41 199 12b 7'@
9:00 P.". 3 0 83 41 ytf:;2- 210 126 74 537 +~
10:00 P.". 3 0 75 29 221 113 37 478 (i1-~
11:00 P.". 0 0 58 21 221 88 0 388
12: 00 IHDNlSHT 0 0 42 21 221 b3 0 346
"I
..
TABLE V
SHARED PARKINS ANALYSlS ITE RATES FOR
RETAIL USE, ULI/ITE RATES FOR OTHER LAND USES
SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS - WEEKDAY
JOB NUIIBER: 4677.02
JOB NAltE: CA T AU HA CENTER
DATE: JUNE 30, 1988
HOTEL
------------------------------------------
OFFICE RETArL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB GUEST ROOIl REST/LOUNGE CONFERENCE ROOM TOTAL
PEAK DEMMD: 83 476 50 .~r~ 177 76 148 10Sl
HOUR OF THE DflY 1ft-'
t(P-
6:00IUI. 2 0 0 21 177 15 (l 215
7:00 A./I. 17 38 21 150 15 0 242
8:00 A.II. 52 Sb 3 21 115 15 74 365
9:00 fI./I. 77 200 5 21 97 15 148 563
10:00 A.II. 83 324 10 21 80 15 148 680
11 :00 A. /I. 83 414 15 21 62 23 148 765
12:00 NoDN 75 462 25 21 53 38 148 821
1 : 00 P. /I . 75 476 3S 21 53 53 148 861
2:00 P.II. 81 462 30 21 62 46 148 848
3:00 P.t'!. 77 452 30 21 h2 42 148 832
4:00 P./I. 64 414 25 29 80 38 148 797
5:00 P./I. 39 376 35 41 lOb 53 148 798
6:00 P./I. 19 390 45 41 124 68 148 836
7:00 P.II. 0 ..2.. 50 76 148 877
8:00 P.II. 6 414 50 76 148
9:00 P.II. 2 290 50 7b 148
10:00 P./I. 2 152 45 21 rtfr 177 68 74 540 --
11:00 P.". 0 62 35 21 177 53 0 348 q~
12:00 /lIDNI6HT 0 0 25 21 177 38 0 261
..
"
'eI- '
, "
,
TABLE VI
SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS UlI RATES FOR
RETAIL USE, ULI/ITE RATES FOR OTHER lAND USES
SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS - WEEKDAY
JOB NU"BER: 4677.02
JOB NA"E: CATALINA CENTER
DATE: JUNE 30, 19BB
HOTEL
------------------------------------------
OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB GUEST ROO" REST/LGUNGE CONFERENCE ROO" TOTAL
PEAK DE"AND: 83 586 50 )1~7 177 76 148 1161
HOUR OF THE DAY lJV
~J--
6:00 A.I'\. 2 0 0 21 177 15 0 215
7:00 A.I'l. 17 47 21 150 15 0 251
8:00 A.I'!. 52 105 3 21 115 15 74 385
9:00 A.I'!. 77 246 5 21 97 15 148 609
10:00 A.". 83 39B 10 21 BO 15 U8 755
11:00 A.I'!. 83 510 15 21 62 23 148 861
12:00 NOON 75 56B 25 21 53 3B 1-48 928
1:00 P.I'l. 75 586 35 21 53 53 148 971
2:00 P.". Bl 56B 30 21 62 46 148 955
3:00 P.". 77 557 30 21 62 42 148 93b
4: 00 P .It 64 510 25 29 80 38 148 B93
5:00 P.I'\. 39 463 35 41 106 53 148 B85
6:00 P.". 19 481 45 41 124 68 14B 926
7:00 P.I'!. 6 522 50 41 133 76 14B 975
B:OO P.lt 6 510 50 41 159 76 148 0D + f;z.
~f- Ilk J6
9:00 P.II. 2 357 50 148 B43 I D jJ.
/;~V ~ oV 74 583
10:00 P.". 2 IB8 45 29 f 77?f!/;o 6B
11:00 P.II. 0 76 35 21 177 53 0 362
12:00 I1IDNIGHT 0 0 25 21 177 38 0 2b1
~
~~~
. '" ~ It 0'0
~~A
TABLE VrI V i2.1l , ~' ~
SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS USING BOYNTON BEACH GENERATION RATESfid ~ I 'JP
UlI RATE USED FOR GUEST ROOltS (j~lD t
SHARED PARKINS ANALYSIS - NEEKDAY II'
JOB NU~BER: 4677.02
JOB NA~E: CATALINA CENTER
~
---'"
-.
.I
.
DATE:
PEAK DEltANI>:
HOUR OF THE DAY
6:00 A.".
7:00 A.It.
8:00 A. It.
9:00 A.It.
10:00 A.,.. \
11:00 A.Il.
12:00 NOON
1:00 P.".
2:00 P.".
3:00 P.,..
4:00 P.I'\.
5:00 P.I'!.
6:00 P.".
7:00 P.I'I.
8:00 P.".___
9:00 P.".
10:00 P./t.
11:00 P.I'!.
12:00 "IDNlSHT
JUNE 30 I 1988
HOTEL
, '"
OFFICE RETAIL ~ANT HEALTH CLUB -~~~;~-~~~--;~;;~~~;~;--~~~;~~~~;-;~~~- TOTAL
112 732 83 41 177 126 74 1345
3
,Al&~
--1f (,,;,
o 279
o
o
177
25
o 226
22
59
2
150
25
71
132
411o~
4
115
25
37 404
I~' 307
74 637
8
97
25
",.
h'J 80 25 H
~ ---. ~~ ~ 968
? 53 63 !\.~ 74
q~ .:vS' 'P ,
. '~,B~_, __....~..!.1:, 7
02 7b
826
50
62
69
74 1075
42
$61
74 1010
eo
63
58
Jt8~
Y--83
I~~K?,
106
S8
74 998
75
124
74 1053
: 83
74 1116
------- -
3
,
\ 83
I
$5'7. 168
~6q 177
37
447
126
74
3
''75
234
113
o
1l(P3
--1'f (0 ;
/d-[
95
58
177
88
o
439
o
o
42
177 63 0 302
)_ \-\~\O~
~" t:' ~ 1tA-\
'f,................'
Kim/ey-Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive, West Palm Beach, FL 33407 · (30S) 84S-066Sl
Raleigh. Durham. Charlotte. Nashville, Virginia Beach. Washington. Dallas.
West Palm Beach. Tampa, Orlando. Fl. Lauderdale. Vera Beach. Ft Myers. Phoenix
May 31, 1988
4677.01(07)
Ms. Tambri Heydon
City of Boynton Beach
120 N.E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
Dear Ms. Heydon:
We have analyzed the effect of trading off some office space for a health club
facility at the Catalina Centre. The site plan as it exists provides 110 parking spaces
for the office site. The proposed change with the health club facility provides 97
spaces.
The parking requirements for the health club facility are as follows:
TABLE 1
PARKING REQUIREMENTS
# of
Land Use Quantitv Rate # of Soaces % Reduction Soaces
Squash Court 1,452 ft2 1:1,800 ft2 1 50% .5
Racquetball Court 1,763 ft2 1:1,800 ft2 1 50% .5
Health Club 21,393 ft2 1 :300 ft2 72 50% 36
Pool 2,700 ft2 1:30 ft2 90 100% 0
Tennis Court 14,400 ft2 1:1,500 ft2 10 50% 5
Office 33,338 ft2 1:300 ft2 J..!l... 0% J..!l...
Total 286 154
Building client relationships since 1967
I
I i/7,?ro;-;-,oro--,n,7, .u;@[J'=
I I,JDLuiIiJU<5UOL'U 0 uu
'1
,
I
Ms. Tambri Heydon
-2-
May 31, 1988
The nature and location of the health club suggests that many of the patrons of the
club will be office employees, hotel guests, residents of Catalina Club and users of more
than one use in the club. These factors permit a reduction in the parking provided.
Based on discussions with Ocean Properties and knowledge of similar facilities, a 50
percent reduction can be expected in the the courts and health club to compensate for
users already on site. The swimming pool is expected to generate demand exclusively
from the other uses on site. Therefore, a 100 percent internal capture was applied to
the pool.
Applying the reduction factors, the proposed office and health club require 112
spaces for the office and 42 spaces for the health club and ancillary facilities. A total
of 154 spaces are required.
Under the shared parking conditions, spaces will be available from other uses on
site. Table 2 shows the parking demand for the uses on the entire Catalina Centre site.
The peak of the site is 1:00 p.m. with a total demand of 1,116 spaces. At the peak of
the entire site, 1:00 p.m., the hotel will have 226 spaces (437-211 = 226) available to
share. The restaurants and retail will require 41 spaces (725-684 = 41), leaving 185
available to share.
The office/health -club will require 122 spaces, therefore, needing to share 25
spaces (122-97 = 25). A shared parking surplus of 160 spaces will exist on site (185-25 =
160). Since this surplus is greater than under previous conditions, with no health club,
the buffers for all the remaining uses on site will be improved. The critical buffer
previously had been the retail buffer. The retail buffer now calculates as:
160 surolus shared oarkinll
684 spaces provided + 41 required to meet code
=
21.1%
The buffers for the office and and health club will be as follows:
Office/health club =
160 surolus soaces - 57 reauired to meet code
97 spaces provided + 57 required to meet code
=
ill =
154
67%
I
l"
I
/
("1/""7.-:J '7 ,j" I
L\:. U [Jf;f)!Kfli!lo L;::;)@{J'[Jfj
Ms. Tambri Heydon
-3-
May 31, 1988
Given the peaking characteristics of the proposed uses and their ability to share
from surrounding uses, the parking proposed for the office/health club will have
sufficient buffers as required by the City of Boynton Beach.
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
~~~,~~
Steven G. Godfrey, P.E.
Vice President
SGG/SOR:jsl
467701L5-31.eor / jel
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
)
U>
....
-
c
ox
z
~
-
c
ox
....
~
U>
5
c
....
'"'
!i
-
('J~
~
j!i
coU;
<!~
f-U;
~
~
~
~
c
"-
.,.
~
~
en
>-
""'
...
~
~
'" c
-....-
~~ii
!~5
!
~ .,
~ e:i .-
"-'"'II!!
~I~
~......
a5~~
...
...."",
:!~
""
....
c c>
....
~
,.
~
-
"'"
~
!i
....
s; C>
8....
ox
....
....
ti
~
....
ox
....
~
....
I~
""
~
....
en
.....
ox
sE
a:
-
U>
!!!!l
CD
c>
a!
...
Si
....
~
'"
.....
ox
i
!::!
...
;;;
...
....
-
~
....
....N
...
:>:
~
~
-....
~...
!
..-
~
""'
In
.... N
... ....
...
~
a:
....
Si
lj
N
....-
:=-
u..
u..
c::>
Q
~
~
...
~
~
...
....
....
C>
...
Ii'>
N
...
:;
...
,...
...
...
'it
..-
....
...
~
~
0-
...
N
<::>
C>
~
...
~
C>
<::>
M
C>
<::>
,..,
..:
c
C>
<::>
~
C>
..
C>
....
,..,
It>
N
~
...
C>
<::>
M
....
...
It"J
~
..:
c
~'
...
<::>
"'"
....
<::>
o
...
Ii'>
....
...
0-
o
C>
M
...
-
~
-
....
..:
c
o
o
a;
:;
...
C>
o
...
~
a
<::>
<::>
M
cD
Ii'>
o
,..,
...
~
..:
c
C>
<::>
r;
~
...
o
...
-
....
:2
"'"
...
...
...
...
~
....
....
<::>
~
-
..:
c
...
C>
~
~
C>
o
M
Ii'>
N
;:;;
....
...
...
':2
,..,
.....
o
~
..:
c
o
<::>
...
::
...
c>
...
...
....
-
...
~
....
o
....
=
.....
.....
...
~
!i
~
...
<::>
5
<::>
...
~
<:>
...
...
....
....
....
....
C>
o
...
...
N
...
Ii'>
.....
....
....
...
~
..:
..:.
g
...
...
...
~
C>
C>
...
$
"...
...
...
o
M
...
...
...,
c>
...
;
..:
..:.
...
o
N
g
~
C>
...
...
.....
...
a
o
C>
...
....
...
...
...
~
...
~
..:
..:.
C>
o
,;;
fC
...
C>
C>
...
N
-
...
-
,..,
...
,..,
...
~
C>
...
...
o
...
=
~
...
...
~
...
~
...
...
o
....
...
...
II>
...,
...
....
;g
:;:l
..:
...
C>
~
...
..: .:
... ..:.
c> '0
o c>
.n ~
...
~
-
C>
c>
....
...
...
...
Ii'>
...
....
c>
...
....
~
,..,
~
o
...
N
o
...
~
...
...
N
...
N
..
.....
...
...
o
...
....
~
...
~
C>
...
..:
..:
o
~
...
...
...
o
o
...
...,
N
CO>
~
...
...
~
CO>
:2
...
...
~
G-
o
C>
a;
...
~
<::>
<::>
...
N
N
...
N
...
...
~
...
~
<::>
c>
.....
,..,
c>
...
::
=
,..,
...
...
:;
...
:;
.....
:;
...
<::>
c>
o
C>
o
-
N
...
N
-
N
...
....
.....
It"J
:;
N
,..,
...
...
...
...
,..,
,..,
o
...
..:
..:.
o
o
r;
..:
"-
o
<::>
~
..:
G-
o
C>
...
-
:>:
CD
~
;:
o
o
~
..,
.T
fXO[]fJfJD@';!7o [}fl@[l[]D
Kim/ey-Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive. West Palm Beach, FL3340"I.(407) 845-~
Raleigh, Charlotte, Nashville, Virginia Beach, Washington, Dallas. Phoenix.
West Palm Beach. Tampa, Orlando. Fl Lauderdale, Vera Beech. Fl Myers
May 16, 1988
Revised June 22, 1988
4677 .OH07)P87-55
Ms. Tambri Heyden
Ci ty of Boynton Beach
120 NE Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435
Re: Catalina Center/Study
Revised to Include Gerulaitis Resort
Dear Ms. Heyden:
As requested, we have revised the parking analysis for Catalina Center
located in Boynton Beach, Florida. This revision is a comprehensive document
which includes a reduction of the amount of office square footage and the addition
of a Gerulaitis Resort (health club/tennis center) along with all previous changes to
the site. As a result of the difference in parking peak characteristics of the
exchanged land uses (office to health dub), the demand at the Catalina Center
peaks at 1:00 PM and 8:00 PM. These peaking characteristics are reflected in the
tables and buffer calculations.
The analysis was based on the City of Boynton Beach parking code; parking
generation rates recommended by the Urban Land Institute (ULI), ULI-the Urban
Land Institute Shared Parking" 1983; parking generation rates recommended by the
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Parking, Generation--An Interim
Report, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1985; and the shared parking
recommendations of the Urban Land Institute, ULI-- The Urban Land Institute
Shared Parking" 1983. All rates used in this analysis represent peak season demand.
Differences in seasonal peaks which exist among the land uses proposed were
conservatively ignored.
Shared parking is an integral part of the Catalina Center analysis. Shared
parking is defined as parking space which can be used by two or more land uses
without conflict or encroachment. In order for shared parking to be utilized, the
peak accumulation of parked vehicles generated by different but adjacent land uses
must not be concurrent.
Building client relationships since 1967
.
;; ---- --~-------; 'I
I' ,roo '7 ""'0:JJ
i u\c.DCfJD!J@r;Jo~~@[](JfJ ,
i ~
Ms. Tambri Heyden
-2-
May 16, 1988
Revised June 22, 1988
Catalina Center will consist of four land uses: office, retail, health club with
ancillary facilities, and hotel with restaurant, lounge, and conference facilities
contained within the hotel. Considering the land use mix, maximum parking
accumulation will occur on weekdays.
An analysis has been made of the northern parcel, which contains 144,620
square feet of retail space with the proposed revision of the outparcel reduction
from 6,000 square feet to 4,295 square feet, and the southern parcel, which
contains 33,338 square feet of office, 24,608 square feet of health facilities, and a
166-room hotel with its auxiliary uses including 18 suites. The north and south
parcels were analyzed separately and combined. The analysis was based on
information provided by Ocean Properties, on the January 21, 1985, site plan of the
total development, the August 27, 1986, site plan of the retail parcel, information
provided verbally in August, 1987, the outparcel site plan of December 28, 1987,
and supplemental information provided in 1988.
Our analysis demonstrates that the proposed parking will be sufficient to
accommodate the parking demands of both the northern and southern parcels,
whether they are considered individually or together.
Northern Parcel
ULI and ITE are the most widely recognized sources of parking generation data.
For a retail development of the size of Catalina Center, ULI recommends a rate of
four spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area. This would indicate that
579 spaces should be provided for the northern parcel. ITE recommends a weekday
parking rate for peak season (Thanksgiving to Christmas) of 3.25 spaces per 1000
square feet of gross leasable area, which would require Catalina Center to provide
470 spaces for the retail parcel. A total of 688 spaces are proposed for the retail
parcel, 109 08.8%) more than required by ULI rates and 218 (46.4%) more than
indicated by the ITE peak season rates.
The Boynton Beach parking code, for retail use, is generalized to accommodate all
shopping center sizes. The code requires five parking spaces per 1,000 square feet
of gross leasable area. According to ULI, this is a rate appropriately applied to
retail developments greater than 600,000 square feet, over four times the size of
the proposed Catalina Center retail parcel. Under the Boynton Beach parking
code,- the Catalina Center retail parcel would be required to provide 724 parking
spaces.
l_~_____
)
4677 .OH07)P87-55
.
n I
; "V7" 0 'Ln
f.lL \~CCDJ!J@\V7o J-t}@[]'[Jf).
, u )
Ms. Tambri Heyden
-3-
May 16, 1988
Revised June 22, 1988
Southern Parcel
Given the hotel/office/health club/restaurant land use mix proposed for the
southern parcel, it is reasonable to assume that shared parking will occur within
the parcel itself. Analysis of the site plan shows that numerous parking spaces
within the parcel are convenient to the four land uses which will allow shared
parking to occur.
The nature and location of the health club suggests that many of the patrons of the
club will be office employees, hotel guests, residents of the adjacent Catalina Club
and users of more than one use in the club. These factors permi t a reduction in the
parking provided. Based on discussions with Ocean Properties and knowledge of
similar facilities, a 50 percent reduction can be expected in the courts and health
club to compensate for users already on site. The swimming pool and outdoor
courts are expected to ~enerate demands entirely from the other uses on site.
Therefore, a 100 percent Internal capture was applied to these uses.
Table 1 (attached) outlines the parking demand which can be expected for the
southern parcel using ITE and/or ULI generation rates. As shown in Table 1,
wi thout considering shared parking, 571 parking spaces are required under ITE/ULI
recommendations.
Compared to ITE and ULI, the Boynton Beach parking code is more conservative
for office, hotel, and restaurant/lounge land use, but requires fewer spaces for
conference facilities. Parking demand for the southern parcel generated using the
Boynton Beach parking code is shown in Table 2 (attached). As shown, without
considering shared parking, the Boynton Beach code would require 653 spaces to be
provided for the southern parcel.
As previously stated, the physical layout and mixed-use character of the southern
parcel lends itself to shared parking. Table 3 (attached) shows the peak parking
demand projected for Catalina Center's southern parcel using the generation rates
recommended by ITE/ULI, and considering the shared parking recommendations of
ULI. As seen, 482 spaces are required to meet the peak parking demand, well
below the 592 proposed for the site. Table 4 (attached) shows the peak parking
demand for the southern parcel using Boynton Beach rates for parking generation,
and ULI recommendations for shared parking. As seen, under these criteria, peak
parking demand will be 533 spaces. The 592 spaces proposed represents a projected
surplus of 70 spaces.
Based on the above analysis, parking proposed for the southern parcel of Catalina
Center should prove sufficient to handling its parking needs.
4677 .OH07)P87-55
.
,.
Ii :
'I r/70 '7 .'"J' I
I 1_,,:c.D{Ji]D!J@I'!oLrJ@(1fJf)
It
Ms. Tambri Heyden
-4-
May 16, 1988
Revised June 22, 1988
Total Development
Given the mixed-use character and physical layout of the Catalina Center site, the
most reasonable approach for analysis of the total development is through use of
ULI shared parking recommendations. A total of 1,280 parking spaces are proposed
for the development.
Projected parking demand for the total site using ULI's shared parking
recommendations are shown in Tables 5, 6, and 7 (attached). Tables 5 and 6 use the
ITE/ULI parking generation rates applied in Table 2 for land uses other than retail.
Table 5 uses the peak season rates for retail generation, and Table 6 uses ULI rates
for retail generation. Based on discussions with Boynton Beach City staff, as the
various hotel components are being evaluated separately, the ULI rate of 1.0 space
per hotel room and the ULI residential rate of 1.6 for the hotel suites is the
appropriate parking generation rate to be used in the analysis. Table 7 reflects this
rate for the hotel room and suite generation and Boynton Beach code rates for all
other uses.
As shown, considering shared parking, the number of parking spaces recommended
for Catalina Center ranges from 885 to 1,117 depending on the generation rate
selected. It should be noted that in all the above scenarios, except where the
Boynton codes are applied to each land use, sufficient parking space is provided on
si te even without considering shared parking. For the remainder of this analysis,
the more conservative Boynton Beach rates reflected in Table 7 will be applied.
The City of Boynton Beach requires that a 10% buffer be provided to ensure that a
sufficient number of parking spaces are available at the time of peak use. Based
on consultation with City of Boynton Beach staff, and analysis of the layout of the
total site plan, it will be conservatively assumed that the retail and the office uses
share only from the available hotel parking of 438 spaces. The restaurant
outparcel may share from the hotel or retail. Also, due to the layout of the site
which is not especially conducive to shared parking between the retail or
restaurant and office uses, buffer calculations have been performed separately for
retail, restaurant outparcel and office uses.
By Boynton Beach code, the buffer is calculated as follows:
B ff _ Surplus Shared Parking
u er - On-Site + Shared Parking Provided
4677 .OH07)P87-55
"
~ r--- ------======:---\
I, 1~/7Fr;;;.:: r; Ii {'-UJ i I
! L<~LL'1/Ltll1i)~ljo u1l2)!7[JfJ
I,
Ms. Tambri Heyden
-5-
May 16, 1988
Revised June 22, 1988
The peak hours of parking demand for the site are 1:00 PM and 8:00 PM as shown
on Table 7. At 8:00, the hotel usage will require 359 spaces of the 438 provided
leaving 79 spaces available for sharing with the other uses. Neither the retail or
the office/health club will require any shared parking at this time. The
office/health club will use 45 of its 95 spaces, leaving 50 available spaces. The
Marie Callenders restaurant outparcel will need to share 24 spaces to
accommodate its parking code requirement of 83. A surplus of spaces of 79 - 24 =
55 spaces therefore exists for the hotel site, leaving a surplus of 55 + 50 = 105
spaces for the office/health club. The buffer for the office/health club (to three
significant figures) is therefore:
9;~ 54 x 100 = 70.59q
As calculated above, during the peak hours of parking demand, 79 spaces of the 438
provided for the hotel are available for shared parking. Also as shown, 24 spaces
will be shared at this time by the Marie Callenders outparcelleaving 79 - 24 = 55
spaces available to be shared with the retail. The peak demand of 630 spaces for
the retail has been met by the 688 spaces provided. This leaves a surplus of 688 -
630 = 58 spaces on the retail site. Overall, the surplus for the retail portion is
58 + 55 = 113. The buffer for the retail (to three significant figures) is therefore:
113
688 + 36 x 100 = 15.6%
During the peak hour of parking demand of the site, the demand for spaces at the
Marie Callenders restaurant outparcel will be 100% of its total requirements (83
spaces). Since 59 spaces have been provided for the restaurant, 24 spaces will need
to be shared with the hotel. The buffer for the restaurant outparcel is:
113
59 + 24 = 136.1%
At 1 :00 PM the buffers are also met. The hotel will require 234 of the 438 spaces
provided leaving 204 to share with the other uses on site. The office/health club
will require 120 spaces, therefore needing to share 25 spaces from the hotel. The
retail center will demand 724 spaces, therefore needing to share 36 spaces from
the hotel. Marie Callenders will not require any sharing at 1 :00 PM. Considering
these demands, the surplus shared parking is 204 - 25 - 36 = 143 spaces. The buffer
for the office/health club is:
143
95 + 54 x 100 = 96.0%
4677 .OH07)P87-55
,,------1
'I i'V7E!~n=n", iLf7-[J'= I
!: u~L'L/IILjLj(sr;/O!J1)(Q) rLfJ...J I
'\
Ms. Tambri Heyden
-6-
May 16, 1988
Revised June 22, 1988
The buffer for the retail is:
143
688+36 x100=19.8%
The buffer for Marie Callenders is:
5J? 24 x 100 = 172%
Although the site demand is equal at 1:00 PM and 8:00 PM, the buffers are greater
at 1:00 since the surplus comes from the hotel. In other words, the entire surplus is
available for the health club and retail.
It is seen that using the Boynton Beach generation rates, both the office and retail
parcels meet the Boynton Beach buffer requirement of 10%.
Based on the above analysis, the 1,280 spaces provided for the total development
should prove sufficient in handling the parking demands of the development.
If you have any questions regarding this analysis, please do not hesitate to
contact us.
Very truly yours,
C~~~~~ATE5' INC.
( ~sportation Engineer
for
Steven G. Godfrey, P.E.
Vice President
JFB:SGG:SOR/mec
Attachments
\-
)
4677 .OH07)P87-55
r
I
I
Cl
Z
<
~
UJ
Cl
~ (j
Z ~
- ~
~ =
= <
< ~
~
Cl Q
Z ~
< <
UJ UJ ::c
...J V') V')
cQ :J 0
< Cl z
.... z ..
< V')
...J UJ
I-
..J <
uJ =
U _
= ...J
< :J
~ ......
Z ~
= -
UJ
:c
....
:J
o
V')
-
l
"O~
V CIl
'- V
.... U
g.CO
VV')
P:::
c:
o
.-
+"
*g
"0
V
P:::
'+-l ~CIl
o U
_CO
.....
V')
~ -.0 11"\
00 ~
* * *
a a a
11"\ 11"\
It''\
o 0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I
* * * * * * * * *
a 000 a 0 a 0 a
11"\ a 0
..... .....
~ N ..... - a a 00 ~ N 0 ~ 00
00 ~ ~ - ~ N N 11"\ 11"\ ~
..... .....
v
u
'-
::l
o
V')
-
....l
:::>
* *
* *
c: c:
o 0
+" +"
c: c:
>- >-
o 0
CO CO
uJ
(-0
-
*
*
c:
o
+"
c:
>-
o
CO
* *
* *
c: c:
o 0
+" +"
c: c:
>- >-
o 0
CO CO
..:
'+-4
0- .
CIl E
s..
V
+"
CO
P:::
~
CO
V
c..
.
....
'+-4 .
0- +"
CIl "":
o aog'a.
o a a 0 a u
o a 00 00 0 11"\ U
..... l"'\ ..... - l"'\ ..... 0
-------
11"\ a a 0 0 a a
. ... .
N~......__t..._4~.....
. .
+" . +"
*': ...... '+-of
0"' "": 0-
CIl 0"' CIl
CIl
....
....
CIl
c:
V
+"'
c:
-
. . .
+" .... ....
.... .... '+-4
. . .
0"' 0"' 0"'
CIl CIl CIl
00 l"'\ N
l"'\ ~ 11"\
l"'\ l"'\ ~
.
....
....
.
0"'
CIl
. . CIl
~ ~ E
. . 0
0"' 0"' 0
CIl CIl s..
.. ...
l"'\ ..... ..... ..... N ~
l"'\ N ......
l"'\
-.0
~
a a 00
a a ~
~ ~ .....
v
CIl
::>
"0
c:
CO
..J
....
.0 s..
::l ::l
..... 0
U U
v .c
U =:
:;:: CO
.... V
o :c
....
s..
::l
o
U
+"
'-
::l
o
U
.c
CIl
<'d
::l
0"'
V')
.....
......
CO
..0
....
V CIl
::l .........
0"' ..... c: v
U 0 c: ....
CO 0 V 0
P::: c.. (-0 :J:
* * *
:3 :3 u.l u.l u.l
::> :::> t: t: t:
.... ....
.... CO
c: CI)
::l CIl
- -
-.0 ~
. N
.....
CIl CIl CIl
+" +" ....
.... CO <'d
c: CI) CI)
::l CIl CIl
00 0 ,..,.
...... ~ a
N
CIl
E
o
o
P:::
CIl
~
.... ....
c: c:
CO co
s.. '-
::l ::l
..... co co
CI) .... ....
.... CIl CIl
o v CI)
:c P::: P:::
.-
::l
V')
:3
:J
.... ....
CO co ....
CI) CI) co
CIl CIl CI)
- - CIl
~ ~ -
N N It''\
.
CIl
....
CO
V
CIl
It''\
N
N
-
.....
v
U
s..
CO
0.
....
::l
o
-
E
o
o
~
CI) gf
~ ....
c: ....
::l CI)
o V
....l ::;;
CIl
....
CO
CI)
CIl
-.0
~
N
.....
~
It''\
.
CIl
+"
c:
co
s..
::l
CO
....
CIl
CI)
'-
'-
o
....
Q)
+"
CO
'-
u.l
l-
-
v
.c
....
.c
....
.~
"0
Q)
\I)
::l
\I)
....
c:
CO
'-
::l
CO
....
CIl
Q)
'-
-
Q)
+"
o
.c
'-
o
....
\I)
c:
o
....
....
a.
E
::l
\I)
CIl
CO
:3
::>
*
lrr.,:. ~ I,
I' ~ '
i 2!
I a
i I ~I
I I @j I
i! ~ I
IlliJ
I~
I
~
r--
I ~
I
I
! @
II 2
~~ ~
v V) 0 0 ~
t- V N ~ Ir\ Ir\ Ir\ -.0 0 ~ rt'I .::t- ""
..... u ..... rt'I . . 00 rt'I Cl'\ rt'I 00 r-.. Ir\ I ~
g.eO - - -.0 I Ie::;
\~
VV') oC::!
a:: i ~~
l:...'::l
'-==
c ?? "* ?? *- *- "* ?? "* *- *- ?? ??
0
.....
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
*-g Ir\ Ir\ Ir\ 0 0
- -
"0
~ V
Z a::
-
0 ~
0:
Z < -~ N N - ..... 0 0 Ir\ ~ 0 -.0 rt'I .::t-
< c.. ..... "- Cl'\ - 00 rt'I Cl'\ "" 00 r-..
:! o u ..... -
0 _eO
~ ....
~ V')
~ <
Z :J: <
- V') V l.L.
~ 0 ~ tj
0: eO
< Z a:: ...; . . .
....
c.. .. "0 . ~ ~ ~
V') C 0" .... ~ . ~
0 .
LIJ eO V) 0" 0'" ~ 0"
. ~
Z l- E 0 ~ V) V) V) E V) V) V)
< < 0 ~ 0" ~ ~ ~
N Q) 0 0 0 V) 0 0 eO eO eO V)
0: Cl .. 0" 0 0 0 0 Q) Q) Q) ~
LIJ LIJ ..... V) 00 00 0 Ir\ t- V) V) V) eO
I/) LIJ - 0 - ..... rt'I - - ~ Q)
....l ::;) 0 C rt'I 0 - - - - Ir\ .;: Ir\ Ir\ Ir\ V)
cO N N .
..... "" rt'I 0 0 0 0 N ::l N .::t-
O .Yo
< 0 t- . - . . . . . - - - - -
I- Z U eO "" - - - - - - N - ..... - -
< ~ c..
....I Z
....I -
~
u.I 0:
U . . . . . . V)
0: < ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E V) V) V) V) V)
c.. .... .... .... .... .... .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
< ~ . . . . . . 0 ..... eO eO eO eO
c.. :c .v) 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0 C V Q) V V
U c V) V) V) V) V) V) t- ::l V) V) V) V)
Z V
0: < ~ 00 rt'I N rt'I 0 0 00 00 Ir\ 0 "- ~
LIJ c rt'I Cl'\ Ir\ -.0 0 0 .:r - N Cl'\ 0 Cl'\
u.I - rt'I rt'I .::t- r-.. "- .:r - N N N
:J: cQ .. ..
Z rt'I - - - N .:r
I- rt'I N -
::> 0
0 l-
I/) Z
>-
0 -
-
CC Q)
u
~ L.o
Q) L.o eO
::l 0.
V) 0 ~
::> u V) ::l E
~ 0
"0 ~ V) 0
.0 L.o - L.o E V) -
C ::l ::l - ::l Q) ~ ~ 0
eO - 0 eO 0 0 ~ C c a::
.....
.....l U U .0 U 0 ::l eO eO
~ a:: V') L.o L.o 00
V .c .c V V) Q) ::l ::l C
u .:!:: V) ::l ..... - - 00 eO eO .....
eO 0" - C V V C ~ ~ ~
..... V
.... eO ::l U 0 C ~ ~ ::l V) V)
.... Q) 0" eO 0 V 0 0 0 V Q) Q)
0 :c V') 0::: c.. I- :c :c ...J a:: a:: ~
!
i
!II
~
~
...
~
~
;:;;
_:::I
- ""
...~
-' :IC
... ...
c ""
...
li
W
~
~
-'
...
.....
""
c
~
,.,
""
...
:z:
13
en
>-
c
""
~
~
ffi
...
,.,
...
.....
en C
-.... z
en 0_
>- 'a
::;!::::~
....C
c ... .....
!
:..: ..
~ ffi ..
G..I!W
e3ii~
!......
... ...
.., ...
-' -
c ...
... ....
...
...
-'
...
i
~~
... -
""
...
~
.....
""
.....
~
.....
...
...
e:
....
....
~
...
.....
...
c
""
..... ...
W'"
a
~
...
en
lIi!
~l::
i!-
...
en
li
gin::;
-'
...
:Ie
...
-'
c
~
_0
5....
I
...
en
.....
""
-' 0
;
-
.....
""
..... ....
~...
LA-
LA-
...
.:;;
~
:IC
...
...
~
~
i
!i!
-
LA-
...
!!
~
....
N
<:>
~
...
....
e:
o
...
....
.:
c
...
o
.4
....
o
....
o
~
...
~
e:
...
!::;
.:
c
...
...
....
...
....
....
...
....
~
~
e:
....
...
....
....
.:
c
...
o
a;
::0
....
...
::!:
~
....
0-
e:
....
...
....
....
.:
c
...
""
.;:
...
on
....
~
~
o
...
e:
~
""
....
...
.:
c
8
.;;
0-
...
....
~
....
....
....
...
e:
~
...
....
...
.:
c
...
""
....
....
....
...
::!:
...
....
....
on
e:
....
....
...
....
...
~
w
...
""
~
....
~
ID
::!:
....
....
....
....
e:
....
....
...
....
....
.:
..:
...
""
on
~
...
..
...
...
....
...
e:
...
....
...
CD
.:
..:
...
...
N
...
...
....
!
....
...
....
...
e:
...
....
...
....
...
.:
..:
...
""
.:;
...
...
....
...
...
...
....
...
...
...
....
~
""
...
...
.:
..:
...
<:>
.:;
~
...
...
::!:
....
....
...
:::
....
....
....
....
<:>
0-
....
.:
..:
<:>
...
.;;
:;:
...
ID
::!:
...
...
...
~
....
....
....
...
<:>
~
.:
..:
...
...
.4
...
on
...
!
...
...
....
~
...
....
<:>
....
...
...
.:
..:
...
""
,:::
...
...
...
...
::!:
....
...
0-
~
t,
....
...
....
o
....
.:
..:
...
""
a;
....
ID
...
ID
::!:
...
...
...
:!
...
....
o
....
...
....
.:
~
...
""
.;:
....
::it
0-
on
....
...
...
....
...
...
...
o
ID
....
....
....
...
....
...
....
.....
.....
...
...
....
....
e:
~
on
...
....
....
....
....
o
...
...
....
...
...
.:
..:
...
<:>
.;;
...
:z:
...
i
;:
C>
C>
~
.:
..:
<:>
...
.
""
~
en
:::I
""
=:1
UI UI
..... ""
...
co: <El
....~
""
""
co:
a.
.....
UI
<.>
a::
co:
a..
-
""
!l!!
....
:::I
""
en
-
~
....
co:
""
UI
-
UI
CD
:c
<.>
co:
...
...
-
""
.
i
i
""
...
w
""
...
....
:z
...
<.>
en co:
_ N_
en 0_
::;,..:;2
I........
.... co:
.. <.>
CD
~
i ffi ..
a..illl!!
~.~
~......
~~~
;a!~
.... ...
o
....
!i~
:5!
....
...
....
o
=
...
<.>
:z
...
IX
....
.
<.>
... ...
~~
a
~
....
en
~
!iN
ON
""
....
~
m
~
N
N
...
!i
...
w
i
... ....
=...,
....
<.>
=
....
....
co:
...
=
.... ...,
~...
!!5
co:
....
en
...
a::
....0
~
...
IX
... N
~::
...
...
...
A
~
15
"'"
~
UI
a..
>
co:
"'"
...
=
....
...
o
~
=
...
....
N
...
on
N
N
N
~
o
00
...,
.:
c
00
...
~
...
lC3
..,.
on
N
!
~
N
...
N
N
.:
c
00
...
;.:.
....
j!;
....
...,
on
N
..
..
~
..
..,.
-
....
.:
c
00
00
m
N
~
..
....
on
N
N
N
~
...
o
..
~
.:
c
...
00
0.:
....
..
...,
..
....
on
N
....
....
~
::
00
~
.:
c
00
00
~
In
~
..
....
~
....
....
~
on
N
o
N
.:
c
00
00
..
-'=
..
....
...,
....
::
~
N
..
00
-
o
:z
I
00
..,.
~
....
00
..
..
....
...
...
::
~
...
In
00
co
.:
..:
00
00
..
00
..
..
....
...
....
....
....
~
00
In
00
....
~
.:
..:
-
00
N
...,
....
...,
..
....
....
...
....
....
~
00
on
00
..
..,.
.:
..:
00
00
,::;
o
....
...,
..
....
...,
....
....
....
...
N
N
..
..,.
....
...
.:
..:
00
00
;;.
...,
..
..
..
....
...
...
...,
...,
....
...,
...
....
..,.
...,
In
.:
..:
00
...
.;;
...
...
..
-
....
...,
!!
....
to'>
In
....
...
....
N
.:
..:
.0
...
~
..
....
..
..
....
...
~
~
....
...,
...,
...
.0
...
.:
..:
00
<:>
;.:.
....
N
on
..
....
....
N
!:
....
...,
...,
...
o
""
.:
..:
00
...
m
...,
~
..
....
...
~
~
N
....
...,
...,
...
.0
...,
.:
..:
.0
...
0.:
....
....
...
....
~
..
..
...,
....
...,
...
00
~
...
...
...,
...
N
N
N
N
N
N
....
N
~
~
In
....
""
In
N
..
o
.0
00
...,
.0
00
.:
..:
.0
...
~
.:
..:
...
...
....
=
CD
i
;;:
..,.
...
~
::
> en en
-....
.... en _
-' >- <Z:
... -' ...
::!~......
<Z: _
!ii:::
- -'
""' =>
a::
<Z: ~
CL~
c::a =>
....
!Ii:
x: <<
en _
....
...
en
....
en
=>
c::a
a:: z
Q <Z:
.... -'
en ...
~!i!
<Z: _
a:: c:>
~~
-.....
>-
<Z:
c::a
""
1M
a::
.....
-
Z
.....
U
ca <Z:
_.... Z
eno_
~....:~
<Z: .... _
Z.... C
C_U
ca
:z
"" ..
:i ffi ..
CL:i!~
~i!ti
!Ii......
:Z:ClCl
en ~ ...
-' -
C ...
_ 0
CO -
-
I!
-'
.....
i
....
ii
.....
a::
....
.
u
l1I~
is
-'
-
-
UI
.....
...
I~
...
-
UI
....
~
~:::;
-'
U
x:
-
-'
...
.....
:z:
gg
~
.,.;
....
~
....
.....
-
C
c::a
_0
~'"
!!5
...
-
UI
....
...
-' 0
-....
... ...
-
....
CI:
..... ...
~...
....
....
CO
GO
~
-=
....
Q
llf
~
>-
<Z:
""
!i!
>-
~
!i
CO
:z:
...
N
...
~
....
....
~
...
...
....
.:
c
...
...
~
...
...
....
...
It')
...
~
~
CD
...
~
.:
c
o
...
,::
~
...
....
~
~
~
...
on
CD
....
It')
.:
c
...
...
.;;
...
lR
...
...
~
....
...
~
It')
....
~
....
....
.:
c
...
...
.;:
...
....
....
...
:!;
~
...
...
~
~
...
....
...
...
...
.:
c
...
...
C;
...
....
....
...
-
...
....
....
....
~
~
...
...
...
...
...
.:
c
...
o
-
...
C;
...
-
...
...
...
.....
~
It')
.-.
....
.....
-
It')
....
!i
Cl
Z
o
...
~
...
jg
...
:!;
...
'"
...
It')
~
.....
...
o
....
-
It')
....
.:
..:
o
...
o
Z
...
:!;
....
...
....
....
~
o
...
....
.....
-
c;
.:
..:
-0
...
N
~
...
-
....
...
....
....
~
o
...
....
...
...
....
....
.:
..:
o
o
,:;
...
...
....
CD
...
CD
...
~
....
....
.....
....
...
o
-
...
....
.:
..:
g
:;
...
It
CD
:!;
...
'"
....
~
....
...
It')
..,
....
..,
...
..,
.:
..:
o
C>
on
!;i
-
:!;
CD
....
...
....
....
...
It')
-
..,
CD
..,
~
.:
..:
...
C>
...
CD
<I
...
:!;
....
....
..,
...
....
..,
...
..,
...
:;:
....
.:
..:
.,.
o
,::
on
gg
CD
:!;
....
....
~
....
...
o
It')
...
o
...
....
.:
..:
...
o
.;;
...
....
....
CD
...
....
....
CD
~
....
...
o
..,
....
...
....
....
-=
..:
o
o
.;:
..,
;;t;
...
..,
....
It')
;:I;
...
....
C>
...
CD
...
CD
..,
...
It')
....
....
....
....
....
....
...
....
~
~
It')
...
....
....
It')
...
C>
~
o
~
....
C>
o
.:
<>-
o
C>
~
.:
..:
C>
C>
>-
x:
...
i
;:
o
C>
N
- Cl<
~~
;:cn~
- ...
... eft ...
-'~c
.... .... Cl<
:!!:~...
c ...
~S
>:<5
""
c
Co.~
::5:::>
~;::!
ili:!!:
...
""
...
~
:::>
"'"
"" .
"'" c
.... ....
eft ""
~':!!
c ...
"" C>
i
"""
...
!III
""
...
...
.
...
...
U> C
-....
u>o-
::;":a!
c.......
. -4IIC
C ... ...
...
.
w ..
~ ei ..
Co.l!lII!
::5i!~
~........
::==
U> .... ....
....
i
m
~
.....
.....
~
:::>
....
...
...
G:
"'"
a!S
... -
= -
-
~:
=-
ae
...
ill
~
...
.
...
... -411
.....
a
~
-'
eft
...
ae
I~
...
...
~
!!l::;
...
...
;
... 0
_It>
!i
C
-
en
...
a:
... ...
-....
C It>
-
...
""
... ...
~CD
....
....
=
A
-
l5
""
~
~
i
...
::
-
...
=
~
~
...
N
co
~
....
....
~
o
o
.....
.:
c
co
co
.:a
CD
...
.....
co
~
~
~
-411
...
~
.:
c
co
co
,:.:
...
~
...
....
~
~
-
~
...
...
~
...
It>
.:
c
o
co
,;;
...
co
-411
CD
:!;
~
....
...
~
In
...
...
.....
....
....
.:
c
o
co
.;:
CD
...
....
CD
:!;
~
o
CD
~
~
...
...
,..,
...
CD
.:
c
co
co
o
...
l!il
CD
:!;
...
...
...
-411
~
~
...
co
It>
...
CD
.:
c
o
co
...
;:
CD
...
~
:;;
~
In
...
....
jj!if
In
....
~
~
o
C>
~
....
'#.
CD
...
...
....
...
It>
~
It>
...
...
....
....
In
....
.:
..:
o
C>
....
::
CD
...
....
...
....
....
~
o
...
~
-
CD
.:
..:
-0
o
N
....
....
...
CD
:!;
....
...
....
-411
~
o
...
o
lR
....
....
.:
..:
o
C>
,:;
i
CD
:!;
CD
...
llil
-411
....
In
....
...
C>
It>
...
-411
.:
..:
o
C>
...
-411
....
CD
CD
:!;
,..,
In
cg'
....
,..,
In
,..,
....
In
...
...
...
.:
..:
o
C>
Iii
~
...
CD
:!;
CD
-411
...
~
....
...
....
...
In
....
...
~
.:
..:
...
C>
.:a
It>
'#.
CD
:!;
-411
....
...
~
....
...
o
....
....
in
-411
.:
..:
o
C>
....
...
g!
CD
...
-411
....
l2
....
...
o
....
~
-411
.:
..:
o
<:>
,;;
In
...
CD
CD
...
-411
....
:!
....
...
o
In
,..,
In
,..,
""
.:
Co.
...
o
.;:
CD
....
It>
...
~
...
....
.....
...
....
o
C>
CD
-411
,..,
....
CD
...
....
....
....
~
....
....
-411
""
~
~
In
...
In
...
....
....
....
~
In
....
o
.....
o
o
.:
..:
...
<:>
o
...
::
...
i
;::
.:
..:
8
o
<:>
.....
i 'g .- ~ ~ ... ~
CD ~ ~ S - :S i f ; ~
... ... - ~ $ c>-
-~ ~ ~ 0 - ~ - -
... ... CD - - -
.-....
Gl- ... "'" 0
- ... ... ... ';:;
... ... .... .... ... .- .-
I ... ... .... ... ..... .- ..... .- ....
I ~;!. <> 0 p; .... .... .... .... .... ....
,
,
\
\ 'Q
\
. ~
.
G1 ,
. l
i .
, ... ... S '2
~ I '2 S ; ... ~
I .... S ... $ ~ ~ ~
~ \,... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ..... -
, ...
a::: . -
~ .
,
,'"
- ,
~ , tA
a::: ,
I ~ .- ....
~ \ ... ~ $ ~ ....
I ~ ~ ~ $ ! ..... ..... ':::.
$ ~ ~ ... - -
I ... ~ ~ ;: - - -
, IS
~$ I ':::. -
I
l~ ,
I
I tA
I
-~ \ 'I
\ 0-
e~ I ... ';:; .... l=? l=? l=? ~ ~ -
",tD I c>- O- ~ c>- O">
i~ ". ". ~ c>- ~ ~ - - - ...
~l=? - - -
::\1: is
~
7-.... i
....~~
_"'W .... ~ ~ .r> ~ ...
~'Cj;';i ~ 5::- $ .... ... or
~ 5::- ~ 0 ..... Of>
~':. i~ 0 .... .... ... ':::. It'>
S!5 l
~ ....
'"
i ~ .... t:> .... ~ ... t:>
... S ... ~ ... ... ... '2 .... .,.
t:> ~ ~ ... ~ <> S ... ~ :;; $ ... ...
... ...'" lS'> '2 ..... ..... ....
-.... -
, 4....
-
~ ... ... ... 0"> .... t:>
- - ~ .... ..D .... ....
i - .... ~ .... ~ t:P It'>
"".... .... ~ ..... "'" - ~ ~ -
",,- - - -
~ ~ --
; i ...
...
c::>
I -
~...~ ~
",0-
~,..::- ~
1':i:S
-"" .... ~ ,i ,i
~ ~ .i .i , ,i .i ~ ,i .i .i ~ ~ ~ ...
i .i .i ,i .i .;:. .;:. ... ... ...
- ~ .;:. .;:. ... ... ...
"" - ... ... ... ... ... ... g Q g Q
~~ .. - -t:> g g C g ~ c <::
~ t:> t:> ~ t:> ~ t:> ;;. E
......'!l! ~ g t:> g <:> 0 "'" <:> - on :.; .;,;
~ ;:. ;; .... - -
~~~ :.; ;,;, ;;. E ;:. - ....
!i~$ Uj ~ , ..... - - -
~ ~
~........ .".
---.---- ------------
. to-
/
Kim/ey-Horn and AssociatesJ Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive, West Palm Beach, FL 33407 . (305) 845-0665
Raleigh. Durham. Charlotte. Nashville. Virginia Beach. Washington. Dallas,
West Palm Beach, Tampa. Orlando, Ft lauderdale. Vero Beach, Ft Myers. Phoenix
May 31, 1988
4677.01(07)
Ms. Tambri Heydon
City of Boynton Beach
120 N.E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
Dear Ms. Heydon:
We have analyzed the effect of trading off some office space for a health club
facility at the Catalina Centre. The site plan as it exists provides 110 parking spaces
for the office site. The proposed change with the "health club facility provides 97
spaces.
The parking requirements for the health club facility are as follows:
TABLE 1
PARKING REQUIREMENTS
# of
Land Use Ouantitv Rate # of SDaces % Reduction SDaces
Squash Court 1,452 ft2 1:1,800 ft2 1 50% .5
Racquetball Court 1,763 ft2 1:1,800 ft2 I 50% .5
Health Club 21,393 ft2 1:300 ft2 72 50% 36
Pool 2,700 ft2 1:30 ft2 90 100% 0
Tennis Court 14,400 ft2 1:1,500 ft2 10 50% 5
Office 33,338 ft2 1:300 ft2 Jl.L 0% Jl.L
Total 286 154
Building client relationships since 1967
./ wf}UfJDO@WofX}@flfJD \
(
I
Ms. Tambri Heydon
-2-
May 31, 1988
1
I
!
The nature and location of the health club suggests that many of the patrons of the
club will be office employees, hotel guests, residents of Catalina Club and users of more
than one use in the club. These factors permit a reduction in the parking provided.
Based on discussions with Ocean Properties and knowledge of similar facilities, a 50
percent reduction can be expected in the the courts and health club to compensate for
users already on site. The swimming pool is expected to generate demand exclusively
from the other uses on site. Therefore, a 100 percent internal capture was applied to
the pool.
Applying the reduction factors, the proposed office and health club require 112
spaces for the office and 42 spaces for the health club and ancillary facilities. A total
of 154 spaces are required.
Under the shared parking conditions, spaces will be available from other uses on
site. Table 2 shows the parking demand for the uses on the entire Catalina Centre site.
The peak of the site is 1:00 p.m. with a total demand of 1,116 spaces. At the peak of
the entire site, 1:00 p.m., the hotel will have 226 spaces (437-211 = 226) available to
share. The restaurants and retail will require 41 spaces (725-684 = 41), leaving 185
available to share.
The office/health club will require 122 spaces, therefore, needing to share 25
spaces (122-97 = 25). A shared parking surplus of 160 spaces will exist on site (185-25 =
160). Since this surplus is greater than under previous conditions, with no health club,
the buffers for all the remaining uses on site will be improved. The critical buffer
previously had been the retail buffer. The retail buffer now calculates as:
160 surolus shared oarkinR
684 spaces provided + 41 required to meet code
=
21.1 %
The buffers for the office and and health club will be as follows:
Office/health club =
160 surolus soaces - 57 reauired to meet code
97 spaces provided + 57 required to meet code
ill = 67%
154
/XUUfJDO@fJo[J{]@[l[JD
r
Ms. Tambri Heydon
-3-
May 31, 1988
Given the peaking characteristics of the proposed uses and their ability to share
from surrounding uses, the parking proposed for the office/health club will have
sufficient buffers as required by the City of Boynton Beach.
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
~~~,~~
Steven G. Godfrey, P.E.
Vice President
SGG/SOR:jsl
467701L5-S1.sor / jsl
rI"
.' .
u>
~
cS:
""
~
4
""
....
~
is
cS:
....
...
15
!a
N >-
c
...
~
~
U>
;:;;
>-
~
~
~
~
i
"-
...
~
~
U>
uJ
..J
co
<X:
I-
...
...o ,...,
~~
o
....
I
I
I
.
I
,
,
,
I
I
I
I
. \
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\~
I'""
I ....
.-Ilffi
..........
i\s
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"" C>
W
~
""
~
I
<->
11: C>
c:> ....
o
0::
.......
~~
~
'"
~
>-
u>
....
""
:IC ....
8~
""
;:;;
~
rD
C>
...o
~
!a
e
u>
....
""
i
~
o
;:;;
""
<->
~
...o
<-> ....
...
::c
~
'5:!
-""
;K""
<It
~
....
::z
""
on
...oN
-....
4
-
....
""
=-
4
'"
t:1
""
N
....-
~....
...
...
c:>
""
....
....
~
U> ""
U;S~
~,..:a
-a....-
,.....4
-a_W
tD
~
J~
.-=~
~fi~
~CSlCC
::cOO
"'........
....
....
....
C>
o
,;;
~
:II:
....
""
~
~
....
....
....
C>
on
'"
....
~
o
<:>
=-
-a
'"
....
:::
-
~
gs
~
....
""
...
...
\!3
<:>
,...,
;;
...
""
~
""
...
.,i.
C
o
o
~
o
N
Ii>
,...,
'"
""
Ii>
on
...
~
o
~
<:>
~
-
o
o
.,i.
C
<:>
C>
;:.
C>
....
N
on
""
....
~
....
,...
~
CD
....
...
o
<:>
.,i.
C
<:>
<:>
.;;
C>
o
....
N
""
\!3
on
C>
...,
...
...
~
....
C>
o
""
o
<::>
.,i.
C
o
'"
<;
...
....
l5:
....
....
:2
,...,
...
-
~
....
~
~
C>
...
...
<:>
o
.,i.
C
C>
<:>
~
~
o
o
....
~
...,
It'>
...
o
....
""
Ii>
...
;:;;
...,
::
.,i.
C
o
<:>
-
-
~
~
o
,..
lE
,...,
It'>
C>
<:>
....
...
....
...
...,
o
....
~
15
~
...
o
~
<:>
...
....
....
N
....
on
...
,...
on
N
....
~
...
...
~
<:>
~
C>
o
.,i.
.,:
C>
<:>
<:>
....
M
....
...
g
~
o
$
...
...
o
<::>
,...,
~
....
~
.,i.
0:.
<::>
<::>
N
.~_._--~.-.". ~-
C>
,...
N
....
...
...,
...
g;
...
-
~
g;
...
C>
<:>
CD
<:>
o
....
N
s::
0-
<:>
<:>
,::;
C>
,..
lE
....
-
....
~
...
...
,..,
-
~
C>
..c
~
"'"
C>
N
...
.,i.
.,:
<:>
<;':
-
...
....
....
on
~
....
,..,
,...
on
,..,
on
...
~
....
...
~
...
<::>
.,i.
0:.
"'"
...
on
C>
""
...
....
~
....
...
C>
....
...
~
...,
~
...
...
...
....
on
....
on
...
N
.,i.
0:.
o
C>
~
....
...
C>
....
""
II>
on
...
..c
..c
~
""
-
'"
....
~
<:>
o
~
0-
...
...
;:.
C>
...
,...,
~
...
~
""
CO
....
~
...
...
on
...
QI)
...
o
o
.,i.
0-
o
C>
.;;
l5:
-
N
o
,..,
<:>
"'"
C>
on
....
<:>
<:>
~
....
CD
CD
!2
....
~
....
~
....
....
<::>
""
""
<:>
""
""
....
N
....
....
N
....
....
....
CO
...
....
....
on
:;
....
...
...
""
,..,
...
...
CI'-
.0
,..,
,..,
o
<:>
.,i.
0:.
<:>
"'"
<;
.,i.
0-
...
o
~
.,i.
.,:
o
o
....
....
$:
tD
;&
e
:II:
o
o
~
-'--'_.---~ --------------
QE RGLLA-'i Ii ~ lEA.iA....//61<.CSDI'<.../ ~ Sl?. _
i .. ~a-d-d-~~~~
~~~/~.~:
- ,-)-/fve/ #1}. 9j, ft(}~ == .
117- JUuteA ~r oF[1te... 33 53? 1ji
~:!J... ~~(~ CJu..b 1~ ~1; ~(I)t>
~.5Z% ....e<'<. I ~I(.,O e "- 3"- '1 q f. 4 P
'1>l -r ~~~J6"J;1. + 3~ 330r 61r q 4-&(1
4-' ~1 JL :5 1 ,/4 '7
, ~ 1 'T ( ~~ rfJ\..V'- <
(63
,., (j;C' /; 3DD ~ Iq~,~ .
-4' AD 'ItJJV'_ ~ . _ ~ i..f~ ~ ~
~i. :s- :;Ji; I .
(f)~/t/,,' /~)fJ,C;'1 F ~~~~~
(!)~,JA . ~(~,.! {i,' . i~,' i/E:e71, ,1 ,ilI,"~, 5(),...'If.. ~~.,~
''-/' C.:rt'I': j,n; :, /l(-I--z~,"'AtS;: 1\ }/. /,1. /l/!
j ,,'~ i 'I-""W K., : /~ l ,/ ..'
II~~ vv ~@~~~~~~
, , - ttv-ff-.k~ ~.~ ~ -,-- -~. 1/ ~ / ~~.4/ ti
,)L"~~ ~~'c ~ !t>O% ~1
q~~/ ~ ~ 00%7 ':
jO/iV' /
~(p r @ 1i bJ~J,~, ~~
q~l4f ~ -'I~' ~;;~> ~
\\'Z- ~v ~~/?:).~~:'" "-. .,' ~- -r: JJ , ,/) .
~~ ~t1-- W J I~ ~e {..^-. .
.,~ ~ ..A:Z. ~~.. ..I . ... (j
FMi.. ~ ~~ ~
.~~ ~ ~ ~ /ld.JnA~~ .
L::') --;') " · ~ r
6J~~~~.~
~~~~~~
d(ftu~~~~A~&/-
~~,~~' ~
-
~"f)~ .
~ @---I~ ~ ~? t ~Jv./~
, . ,'~ - ~. ' .
~ [) :!MJ~~~~~
y'@ ~ P:' fd-~
v~~. ~.~~~O-
_~;d~-k~~
~.~
(])~~ ~.? ~'7
~ ~rr~~ ti-'fte--
v'W ~ ~-. '1~}
t ? ~
~ ' pmlU/ {J./ ~ ~ ~ rch
~ I ce>
~,j 8J ,~~ ~ !Y-/-1J .~~ft-yj ~
~ 6-- I" -rr',-~-
v- 1t/ ~ p-y r ~ u--~'
-'(jJ~~~' ~f~~
qJ p+J ~ ft~ ~ h'- !JtJ ~.
i~~?
?-'!3!<.tLLk:{T:r5 RES(fJ/~ r
/4 WIrL-L- Df rA-:r L frP 1<.. fJ Cl--ff. f S Tf312 E-ke U? su/cE S /foULJ)
F>>/JFL)r; /5 * Ir~-I-O-It--r () f- 6 FFCTJ
2. h- 6" FtloT 1t-.:rc:.ft-Cc9A!C{J:fE BLock WA-LL-Ts f<E-QG{+/2I-~
A-D u rr.rNt-x E5TPeMT-TkL ?oA/-I-~~
"3. /t 5.lTE P[J,JlJ /10 Df FTcA-r:rgN W,rL-C 13~ R-CGJ rAFRISO
T (;) S ffo w _C;o H-t R E [J .J A P;~ 0 V I:)f r: Aii5 w+ rtf- T/J-E
E-X-1-srJ-NtL fcJr-r- .;(fo{ ( /fo lEt S.:rrEj :r.AiCLufJj:Jv(
P~:rVr:w~y (OAJ;1/~L rroJV-s'j RE){tJ cfJr-t OF lA-I< F:rA;~
S PA-cE 5> ~ A-A/;5 Tff-c Srf:~-l~-PV~ 0 r rrf-E CA-f f(()O f-
A-AlP wA-- Lfw ;f-Y-5
Lf\ T!f-155J:Tf /(r.{5T BE f(~PLJr--rr.5j) tl<ftD R To life
j:S5c(kJ/CE OF Jr !JC{:r-~j)+AJc.. f">ERJt.+f,
5 ~ It OJVJTi CJF T:rTLE /rN;') A- C:~ cJ 55 j)/t-/(f:;:.Nk kAlj)
A(CLSS5 )tuRr:E}{EAlT W]:LL Of: l<-!3au.:rREIJ Fol<
5!f-IrKJN( of fJrc:r~+rPES .Jt-.A1j) .:rJl;TE~kA-r+o)./
C)f Ttf-{5 5:rrt !LA-Jv lA/rf!f-T!f-!: /f-oTEt:.sJr;::
t (JrA/.,
;: Ttf-e TorJt-t ?t~Ro.55 FLooK A-REA- FoR fftE OF/=+LS/
j(ES-~KT:J5S ~>/fowAl ro L5C 5"0 1't' S&u;f-RJ3 /-13Er
ON iff/: y+ T /.S f(;f-N A-ffuc k T+{))/~ T!t/3l*f?~r;fj~
{kLcfA[Jr TloN Fox 80 ru- () fF-ICES 1w!1[)JJlf:),-c.T If-
. ' . _ S1fCT~f/S!/'- If. (('#.{ l..J31 ~...reC~.J, G
(L GtE :r 5 / 3 :DA-Cf Pt:f:. 300 S62. C{lrP-E /-fJ3T tCF;f ~=-:J
JtC-L t-ElkT!:-D OCLtf')oo!< FJrcJ:L--:rT:rE5 ...sf/Left As
r tf-f5 ? <D 0 L- Jr-,f; j) T f5 )j )/+.~ Co c.t R T-S J (".t>> j] E ('fJ A/J.Il) C-C,R f'1
/0 t3~ Jr}J cr LLJr-/<. 7 aSE5 (0 fltJ:: ;(/'35oR T ;f-N,D /t--)
~C;U( If) [jJ:; GC Nt) r j2E6Lu.JRE //<0 v l-S:[:oN cf !rj)j).j.-rP:;AlJr[
PJr/<.f:r Iv ( Sf/refS. TffE S/tA-/<.Ej) f)A-Rf :r}/~ A-u oc.A-T -IO.A-
5 jf-oucD j? E f2i: v+s r:J5 Bk)f3=JJ 6# TffE-+Lio Vc" Tr
WovU__?\ Jrl'r>r:Jt/<-- To fifz /t-/"jPRof/~~-J,-rE /0 (A-LC:U[.+/c
_Sf: P .A R it- / t P Jr Ie JrJV Cc A-{ ( () /1 U LA- j+c)V (- u p V~ 5- Fe K
/fff- cC'FFfc (5,/rN b Ttf-r: R-J~5of(r) h_s 1 If E Y Gvo U L 0
JrrPEJ:R ;0 J:X/tr!3+f /J1FfEREJvr fEA-1e f/t-Rk+/V~
/J fit k)J j) S ~ ,If j):r 5 C (/L S --,:r 0 Jv (J I'::: T ff-r s s /f-o fA (, D [5 E
IJv CL uP f DIN T!f-E f(f5 fo R T~
7v T tf-(:: ~ Pi<f3 v:ro fAS{ Y JrffRo VE fJ S /f)'-!:.L-=-j) I~R. k-rJV4
It-t[V{ A:r:ro)Js (o,1<. Tftf fcA-r );0. cZ, -S'/kJtrr )/~
CENrf/< AN'D hkRff cJr~[f)j/JE^ ts I<E5T}t-rA/(A-AlT
A- R E 8 k5l:: 0 )/1} P JrR- T CJ;U ;f-- 7 ~ &00 3'4< Foo T ~ /::prCf.
B C{:rC)):r}J?:. 0 {c- up '( ..f)/~ T tf-E f Jt-/Zc E L CU ff/3i2 E Tff c
R f:50!<- T -{-5 fRo pes E [) # ~; [NeE- Tff-f- CJ ft=-;rCE- !JU;rLD:r);t
{s TtJ 13f5 CrfJr.AJ~c: D To If- Co)y!31A/!3D {) F preE/ABoRT
(of1PC!5XJ TffE (J ~rJJrrsT:rc~ j)A-TA- !r-)JjJ j]UFF-/3)(
ckCc. CA L k T-FoN_5 {of( kLL !5X-+.5 T:rk~ tf 5 E 5 /f:),VE
(]er=JJ hoDrp.Jc.Dt TlfE /<.Efo/~. T 5 uiJ}f:rrrEJ) FuR
Ttf-E !<-&-5-0;< T /)u155 )va r rJvC{(At>f5 A-N at/JkiF-P
VEf~s-:r{jN OF- TfrB tf<J:v;ro Cl5L; ./c 0B}{.+JTEIJ
j)o{uJ1[3)JTA-T:ruN' f6/< THE bXf5rJ-N~ (AS (35 ~
W'tf:-:ti:. ,{f- r If- ;- 5 P u c u..}f E NT kT:ro Jv _~~[f-v C{ CD 13 E
~~uf3lt:r TT I~t> ~-L-' :rJJCO/(fOK /t--r!5D W+ltf-:t-Jv
6#! k 5j:AJa.LE- CD)i/J/2r:rf-EJvs;rV!5 l)ocuAE/./T,
ff. G'o.A?f2.f);-~rVE /3)vca:}jr:[3RFAI~ /v2JrVvrk~5 A-RL=
^-fQ C{:rA~D FOK -J~:rTE f{yt-N Jrff'!<oV.lrLi t/2ELr)1rJ//r;2
J),\)rwrNus 0 P If- CoA/cf.S? TuA-L )lA-JUR/: ;i-R C )Iv r
!f-{[EPrkB LE i
1,
TtJ-e :rJJrfNr' 0 f T!f~ Coli PR E ftl3/UsrVE f[IrN
IJEVELCJPJiENT ;)0 LJ:CrcS Fo;{(fREkTAENT u F
3"T<fJf(A W IrTI3/<- ({ (jAil) Fr":- rAOpt P A-V ;:() f~,f-I2~):)/~
A- j(E Jf-s :rs rrfJrr rr f3 ~ P+v ~f:- re fJ () rJ~;:z. k
C-/CJr-c;s ~ t> .k/< f k t;<.:r 0 K /0 I3)Jr~ R:r NCc /}N r AI CE T
SrR ucTu ~E ~ rIfE f'r.;:o P~5r::: () P((;f-:r ;(/H-'~ YC(j-!3/~0
" Iv' r ~,r~'Eera~ --~ /) c n ...,-; 'f,' - -
-r 5 6) t 07'7~ S-i.k5.-- ~ $, Crv </--. r I J /'--' /:- S I Fe: r / 0 / lI-t-"75 ~
jJ6 L~crE_( II
/0 ~ :rr r5 ;<E{oh ){E)v'j)[5f) TlI-A-i k to/l--D.r/tJa coke- BE
,/1:-0 vTD0P /~cR rrr-:r-r; ().~'[5 [o/JS~_<;/EJvr wrrlf-
~-fc r+o/V /1 - ytil OF ;f-fffA/[)J:X ~ ?oAl.r~ ~
1(~)rJl OJv"~5+T1: Ti<Jt-r=p:rc FLoW fcJr;-JV ;ps /<[=& rA+IC!:~
Jjv C C C{ D -fA! fc ? Jrv [5)( f- /v r )( Jr;<k rJv uS /tAl J) r I< k F f::: ~C
S:;rCZ)JS:
12. Soft [: TiP};; C9F 5.ftJE-wlt-ck c9R oTrt-!:R?!3/5EST>e;r/r-AI
, (v/lr L f- CV It f .5lf-t5 fA CP (3 I~ P /2 0 V :p j) 13 D ~ I~~-/!==: ' To
(' 0.))11/ E:c T T tf-t5 f/~ 0 ? 05 ~ f) It C{ t T f- ~ /":: A-){ F [, t IJ2 o,-T L"Y:.
LA; +- rrf-- Trt-f- ;<~5fJ k T,
j]. ,PfClt-:rJJIt-~E CA-[[ ucJr-T:roA/S A-R t:- J(E62 a~ kEf)