REVIEW COMMENTS
CITY MANAGER' S OFFICE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
#; ?t71~1tJ
~7~
TO: Bill DeBeck
3/19/90
DATE
DEPARTMENT Project Manager
APPROPRIATE ACTION ~
EVALUATION/RECOMMENDATION [J
FOR YOUR FILES [J
ACTION DESIRED PRIOR TO
o
o
o
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
NOTE AND RETURN
OTHER
SUBJECT: Municipal Hall Complex Driveways
Attached hereto please find a copy of Planning Department memorandum No.
90-065 regarding the driveways accessing NE 1st Avenue into the Municipal
Hall Complex. Apparently the site plan of the Municipal Complex was
approved with two driveways permitted for NE 1st Avenue - one to serve the
parking garage and one to serve the parking lot. Now that the City has
decided to open another access (western most driveway) to the parking lot
it will now be necessary for the City to apply for a site plan modifica-
tion, and possibly a parking lot variance. I would ask that you please get
with Tim Cannon from the Planning Department and Don Jaeger with the
Building Department to file the appropriate papers for these modifications.
Your prompt attention to this matter is greatly appreciated. Thank you.
~~
Scott Miller, City Manager
JSM:cd
cc: Tim Cannon, Interim Planning Director
Don Jaeger, Building & Zoning Director
RESPONSE:
RECEIVED
MAR 20 .
PLANNING DEPT.
Date (Action Completed)
Signature
-
..
..
~,
PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 90-055
TO:
J. Scott Miller, City Manager
FRot'1 :
Tambri J. Heyden, Assistant City Planner
TH~OUG~: Timothy? Cannon, Interim Planning Director
DATE: March 15, 1990
SUBJECT: M~nicipal Hall Complex Driveways onto NE First Avenue
Please be ~dvised that as shown on the attached copy of the
approved site plan of the Municipal Complex, two driveways were
permitted from N.E. 1st Avenue - one to serve the parking garage
and one ~0 serve the parking lot. The comments referred to in
your memorandum dated ~arch 12, 1990 were the Planning
Department'3 comments after conducting a preliminary review of ~
site plan ~ubmitted to our office prior to formal ?lan review of
this project by the TRB. Item ~5 of these commen~s, consistent
with Section 5-142(11)7 of the Parking Lot Regulations, states
that because three driveways were shown on tile N. E. 1st Avenue
fro~tage: Gne driveway would have to be eliminated or a variance
would have to be applied for. As project manager. Bill DeBeck
opted to eliminate the western-most driveway to the parking lot.
This department has not been contacted by anyone about changes to
the approved site plan prior to your memorandum. However, if it
is the desire to construct anything other than what is reflected
on the attachej site plan, Mr. DeBeck will Geed to apply for a
site plan modification dnd ~ossibly a parkin~ lot varlance, if
the change requested is inconsistent with the Parking Let
Regulations. Please note that three driveways onto N.E. 1st Ave.
would require a variance.
..>)
d~~' 9~
TAHERI J. HEYDE:I.J
/bl"s
Attachment
c~' Central File
- .= .._~ -- -:- ,;" "~' -;-)
~ "-- -~'
MAR
1 ....
l' i"
1890
CITY rr:i\r.!i:.C=;::';~ C :-=-:-=-; :r::
-\
'\
----
~--
\
\
\
I
\
\
-------
-----
---
-----------/
~
...--- ~"l'p.O _,~
- s'\' eO\l~ ~-
s~ ..-----------:-- ~ (
- ~ \
1
/'
t .f""
, \ , r-:--
, \ -,:. -- /'
,.~:--'~\.
, . C'"
\ ' -
i ~ \ ' ,
\ .,
'\
\
. ,'L
.l .~t ;'
( :; " \
, ('> ,
: ~ \
, -
c " \
'z ,
. .'
. .
.. {,\
~
hI
i~
:. ~
.'"
l,,~
; \~
,?,
, '(';
.. \:
?
~
'''l
o
r-
(\
C'
~
\'-:2
?,
;--/-
\
,
, ---'
~-
? ~,
~ :.
(~
'\'
---:-
/
I
.J----;.
(.
1
~
,
'---- -
//..--
-f"'\'('
\
\
,
I
\
\
\
1
\
I
,
\
\
\
\
,
\
\
\
\
,t.-
\
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
TO:
Vincent Finizio
Tim Cannon
Don Jaeger
DATE
March 12, 1990
DEPARTMENT
Engineering/Planning/Building
APPROPRIATE ACTION []
EVALUATION/RECOMMENDATION []
FOR YOUR FILES []
ACTION DESIRED PRIOR TO
o
o
o
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
NOTE AND RETURN
OTHER
SUBJECT:
City Hall Driveway
Attached hereto please find a copy of a Memorandum No. 90-014 from Bill
DeBeck, Project Manager, reference access way to the City Hall Complex;
more specifically, the second driveway that was added to the City Hall
parking lot. Based on the site plan review comments of the TRB on or about
August 4, 1987, item #5, if two driveways are permitted then a variance
need be applied for and processed. .
I am now asking that the three of you coordinate the required variance per
Section 5-141 (g) 3, so that in fact this site can be approved and closed
out.
Your prompt attention is appreciated. Thank you.
.
~~
J. Scott Miller
City Manager
RECEIVED .
l\R 13 18>>
P u-\ 1\1 NII~G DE.PT~
-"..,.,.
JSM : j b
Attached
cc: Bill DeBeck, Project Manager
-
-
RESPONSE:
Date (Action Completed)
Signature
/L: ~~
~#~-
/1' U:tk~
, /h)
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 90-104
March 16, 1990
TO: Bill DeBeck
Project Manager
FROM: Don Jaeger
Building & Zoning Director
RE: VARIANCES FROM PARKING LOT ORDINANCE -
CITY HALL COMPLEX
Currently there exists three (3) driveways from the City Hall
complex, on both N.E. 1st Avenue and N.E. 1st Street. I have
discussed this issue with the City Manager and the Engineering
Department and have attempted to discuss it with the Planning
Department. It is our current consensus that all driveways are
necessary for the proper ingress and egress from the City site
onto the public thoroughfare. Therefore, as per our telephone
discussion, I recommend that you apply for the necessary
variances from the Parking Lot Ordinance, which requires a
maximum of two (2) driveways onto any public thoroughfare. The
variance would need to be filed with the Planning Department and
I can assure you of my support through the process.
DJ:bh
Attachments
XC: J. Scott Miller
Vince Finizio
Tim Cannon
., \
. Ij \
X,f,t-'l 'tt "J '----
Don Jaeger
\ !
VARIANCE. DOC
-..
'in "1ri~~v"rv, ~D'
W~ f-1, \'f . I ~1 :' " ~~
" ,,'--, , ...... J,I..1.. dL4 '
..
10\Q
~ "",
j '"": r" F-PT!'
. "f" ~
.
..~ -....
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
;"- -
TO:
Vincent Finizio
Tim Cannon
Don Jaeger
DATE
March 12, 1990
DEPARTMENT
Engineering/Planning/Building
OTHER
o
D
o
APPROPRIATE ACTION []
EVALUATION/RECOMMENDATION []
FOR YOUR FILES []
ACTION DESIRED PRIOR TO
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
NOTE AND RETURN
SUBJECT:
City Hall Driveway
Attached hereto please find a copy of a Memorandum No. 90-014 from Bill
DeBeck, Project Manager, reference access way to the City Hall Complex;
more specifically, the second driveway that was added to the City Hall
parking lot. Based on the site plan review comments of the TRB on or about
August 4, 1987, item #5, if two driveways are permitted then a variance
need be applied for and processed.
I am now asking that the three of you coordinate the required variance per
Section 5-141 (g) 3, so that in fact this site can be approved and closed
out.
Your prompt attention is appreciated. Thank you.
..
cc: Bill DeBeck, project Manager
111JC~
~~
Pl.4", [,,. "'_
IVIIVG
Dfpr..
~
.
~~
J. Scott Miller
City Manager
JSM : j b
Attached
RESPONSE: ~f2.~....f,\\~ '. l=1~~ k'AW'S~l ~ 5<.c.~ s- \l\"2. (h) ~r,vE-W'4'S
~b~d-t~ S- \LTz (h) (~) ~~~\'t-.k -pAt-I'--\V'lb \0'\ dA\\J~a..'f "1"'4 k. ~STn)clc.J..
ctoc;;.~----t-h~", 3D / -h.~~ ~~c.~ ne,.tt-r~-bf-'-4 \I'V\~S Atov'\~ l~, ~
(w~ €'fC-~ ~\.<;~) ~d. \Z3o I ~~ s~ c1- a:.. ~G\-\-~ d4.S~
(S'l:. l~~'\~ ~ toc:.<d) ~~) ~~ -~."v~a..'( ckr~ no-T
~ ~ ~ C~1ts'\'f ~ Wou\d .,e..~\,);rE. ^', \JA\I~ . ~ ~.
~. ~ .s~ ~ ~ a:dcL~ ~~ l/V'- ~~ -\.0 \J~~-iT~ ,
~ QS ow\,\V\5. ~\f-- ~ . -D - r .
Date (Action Completed) ~-\~-~O Signature~A~t~
CC'. ~\\ ~"B&C~ ---.r:x,tJ ~-AE.6E/\ -rIm CP\-1'\Y\on
CITY MANAGER I S OFFICE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
TO:
Vincent Finizio
Tim Cannon
Don Jaeger
DATE
March 12, 1990
DEPARTMENT
Engineering/Planning/Building
APPROPRIATE ACTION []
EVALUATION/RECOMMENDATION []
FOR YOUR FILES []
ACTION DESIRED PRIOR TO
D
o
o
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
NOTE AND RETURN
OTHER
SUBJECT:
City Hall Driveway
Attached hereto please find a copy of a Memorandum No. 90-014 from Bill
DeBeck, Project Manager, reference access way to the City Hall Complex;
more specifically, the second driveway that was added to the City Hall
parking lot. Based on the site plan review comments of the TRB on or about
August 4, 1987, item #5, if two driveways are permitted then a variance
need be applied for and processed. .
I am now asking that the three of you coordinate the required variance per
Section .S.~1.4l.---.{-g )-. 3, so that in fact this site can be approved and closed
ou t . "".. ~ :..,.
Your prompt attention is appreciated. Thank you.
.
F;?~
J. Scott.Miller
City Manager
JSM : j b
Attached
~. <-. ',-"'
cc: Bill DeBeck, Project Manager
RESPONSE:
Date (Action Completed)
Signature
MEMORANDUM #90-014
MARCH 6, 1990
To:
J Scott Miller
city t-Ianager
From:
Bill DeBeck
Pl'Oj ect Manager
Subject:
City Hall Driveway
As per the attached letter, a 2nd driveway was added to the
City Hall parking lot. At the time, I stated repeatedly, that I
felt it was illegal and had been turned down by the TRB
previously. I was assured by Engineering, Planning and the
Building Department that it was not.
Please read the attached site review comments from the
August 4, 1987 site review. Note item #5. Would you instruct
the three concerned Departments to coordinate the required
varlance per Sec 5-141 (g) 3, so the site can be inspected and
approved for final CO.
~M
Bill DeBeck
Project Manager
BD/jj
"Q TIC' j'PIVED
.i."~tr_1L'" 1 ....1:.....,~
MAR 7 1990
CIlV (,'!/\N,4GER'S OFFICE
r \
),
lliGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMJ NO. 90-034
February 27, 1990
FRCM: Vincent A. Finizio
Acting Assistant to the City Engineer
~~(f;rn;nW{IID
FE'S 9'" 1990
PROJtC f 1';I:-'I"J~\GER
TO: J. Scott Miller
City Manager
RE: Municipal Expansion Project, City Hall Parking Facility
In-place Southwest Ingress/Egress Approach
"
Please consider all(J1.o,'ing the above referenced approach to remain as constructed.
The origi.1'lal pennit set indicates only one PJint of ingress/egress. After
rnonitorirJ.g this facility during optimum conditions, it has become evident that
two approaches are needed. I feel it necessary to write you at this t:i.Ire,
since t..">-Je contractor has recently begun forming sidewalks along the south
peri:reter of the facility and now would be the perfect time to correct an
inevitc~le traffic circulation problem.
f
~
Should you agree with my observations, a sirrple infield adjustrrent could be
utilized in order to keep construction rnoving forward. Please advise.
\ .
/)t
1_'
/' A
J,if- '
v;/> IZf/rt)
-"I
~L~:
Vincent A. Finizio +-' --0
\1?J:/ de
cc: Bill DeBeck, Project Manager
/.'
BOYNTON BEACH MUNICIPAL COMPLEX- SITE PLAN REVIEW COHMENTS
1. arking a1locatio be
approved in connection wit this site p an or t e commis-
sion chambers to meet parking requirements in zoning
regulations which require 237 parking spaces.
2. There is no buildi~Pthack f~the parking structure from
N.E. 1st Avenue. ,,--~o--v.-\.(.V\.~/
3 ,I~est wing is nonconforming with respect to setbacks_adj acent
, \()\.'\-t?o Seacrest Boulevard and N.E. 1st Avenue. Expansion of
'J entranceway is increasing a nonconformity.
4.
O'*-
eof
@
~ t)"f,>>>vij t
7.
D '("
C\tJ
\.)
O~9.
@ 10.
11.
-L, _.
Does the driveway for the fire station and the two
driveways for the parking structure exceed the requirements
in the parking lot regulations which permit a maximum of two
driveways on any frontage?
There is a maximum of two driveways permitted on any
frontage. Therefore' driveway onto N.E. 1st Avenue
will need to b eliminated a variance ap~~fo~.
(Sec. 5-14l(g) (3 0 Par ing Lot ordinance.~w-Gt""o....k
A f~ve root landscape strip is required adjacent to
N.E. 1st Avenue where the parking lot iSr~ocat~d. )
(Se:::. 7.5-35 (d) (1.) of Landscape Code.) CU~".....v ~ e.
west1=)
~
FIe campsters to be provided for municipal complex?
I= so! provide locations and details showing minimum
10 foot by 10 foot pad and 6 foot high CBS wall to
rna~ch building color.
Driveway onto Boynton Beach Boulevard in the vicinity
of ~~e fire station is located within 180 feet of N.E. 1st
Street. A variance will be required for this driveway.
Is location of sidewalk along Boynton Beach Boulevard
accurate?
feet of the fire
S' ~v-~--e.. 1- G~ h Ij cl6\lA.../r
Not all buildings are located within 200
hydrants. ~ \.}..J"c~J,:>' ~-eCV"o"<' ih.
01'\1"",-,
Previde manufacturer's specifications on lighting fixture.
It is recommended that a minimum average of one footcandle
per square foot be provided for general illumination and
security. (Sec. 5-l41(a).) F I \ I~' ('w-c(
I-t- +r.A- ~'- S C? ...... C" d- '-'3 p- T "j f
..
'0:",
\....
"
..
ENGINEERING DEPAR'IMENT MEN:::> NO. 90-034
February 21. 1990
TO: J. Scott Miller
City Manager
~~(c~~WIE~
FEB ?", 199(1
PROJtt: f t.'iA,';/...GEi
FRCt-u Vincent A. Finizio
Acting Assistant to the City Engineer
RE: Municipal Expansion Project, City Hall Parking Facility
In-plac:e Southwest Ingress/Egress Approach
.,.
Plc::;-:::: ccnsider a.1J.o.,'ing the above referenced approach to remain as constructed.
The cr::igi~l permit set indicates only, one p:>int of ingress/egress. After'
Il"('lni~ ~S' this facility during optimum conditions', it has becane evident that
two -_:.. ,y~ are n-oeded. I feel it necessary to write you at this t:irre,
since -=-..e c:cntractor has recently begun formingsidewci1ks along the south
pe.t:.i--t~ of the facility and now would be the perfect time to correct an
inev~+- ,... '-1 e traffic cLrculation problem.
~."r~ ~'":1'.l. agree with 'ill:l observations, a siIrple infield adjustrrent could be
uH'': -~.:; in CLrder to keep construction moving forward. Please advise.
\ .,
n/L
.....
/' 'A "
, [/1-
iI:~ II' 1''''f)
,... zt I~
.:/
~ k~~.' .
~~.~; --- ~
Vincent A. Finizio 0
'-
"'7"0-" ..
Yr':::/ =:
cc:- -=.; "1 i DeBeck, Project Manager
.,,,.- - ..:.~~/ ,'f '. "
.. ~ - .; ',=. tJ ~. ;f ,t '_/ ;~''''
<>.>'., ~".
" ~.. ~.~ .' ~'''''.2 ~ ]. -... '''';. '( . . '
/-"'.f -'J ,/'/,.:,,1\ ........ ,'~;'.
!,~ ";"il./!ft-~' -' .
~ - ~-= ; ,~ ':1 :
. ,:. "') ",
--,
\~..., '~'... ,'/J~I ~:,'i(;
" ..-\ 'h I;F"".., 11 :>
. ~ ~\ ,,,' . ,} 'f , ~ '.'-', ,:. ~ , ;
:... .' 'j--..,.......
. I.', \ \ ._~~$-'/
--
.
,..
;j~
j"'lEMORAHDUM ;: 9 G - 'J 14
MARCH 6, 1990
r..;,'O:
:; :3cott i'Hller
::1:.y l.;anagei'
from:
3il::" DeBec;~
Project Manager
Subject:
City Hall Driveway
As per the attached letter, a 2nd d4iveway was added to the
City Hall parking lot. At the time, = 3tated repeatedly, that'
felt it was illegal a~d had been turned ~own by the TRB
previously. I was assured by Engineering, Planni~g and the
BUilding Department that it was no~.
please read the attached site review comments from the
August 4, 1987 site review. Note item =5. Would you instruct
tte three concerned D~partments to coordinate the required
varlance per Sec 5-141 (g) 3, 30 the site can be inspected and
approved for final C~.
@fidlM
bJ..l.l DeEeck
P::.'oj ect Hanager
BD/jj
-,-~ .~ ''''4 -~ "':;. --:- 7.:-a."'i~
"_"_._~./ +._~- .:.... .! -~~
MN~ 7 1990
CI'1Y
;,'V</ \~:::::\'S OFFICE
-
\
BOYNTON BEACH MUNICIPAL COMPLEX- SITE PLAN REVIEW COI~1ENTS
1. arking allocatio be
approved in connection wit this s~te p an or t e commis-
sion chambers to meet parking requirements in zoning
regulations which require 237 parking spaces.
2. Tnere is no building ~~thrtck f~the parking structure from
N...E. 1st Avenue. , CO o-"-~ ell\. ~~
3, ,('West wing is nonconforming with respect to setbacks__adj acent
" \~\~a Seacrest Boulevard and N.E. 1st Avenue. Expansion of
~ entranceway is increasing a nonconformity.
4.
0'4-
'of
@
~~r.
tJ'~B (9-
7.
D '("
c\.~
\)
O~9.
@ 10.
11.
Does the driveway for the fire station and the two
driveways for the parking structure exceed the requirements
in the parking lot regulations which permit a maximum of two
driveways on any frontage?
~~e~e is a maximlli~ of two driveways permitted on any
frcn~age.. Therefore. driveway onto N .E. 1st Avenue
will need to b eliminated a variance ap?~fo~.
(Sec. 5-14l(g) ( 0 Par ing Lot ordinance.~Y\rtt"'-o...k
A five root landscape strip is required adjacent to
N.~. 1st Avenue where the parking lot is~ocat~d. )
(Sec. 7 .5-35(d) (I) of Landscape Code.) CU(,\.wt".....v -e,
~e0E
Are ~~~psters to be provided for municipal complex?
If sc, provide locations and details showing minimum
10 =~ot by 10 foot pad and 6 foot high CBS wall to
mat=~ building color.
Driveway onto Boynton Beach Boulevard in the vicinity
of w~e fire station is located within 180 feet of N.E. 1st
S~eet. A variance will be required for this driveway.
Is location of sidewalk along Boynton Beach Boulevard
accurate?
Not all buildings are located within 200
hydrants. P.t4d \.).J"",,-~,:>' ~-eCV'"c:;."<:' 1h.
~
Provide manufacturer's specifications on lighting fixture.
It is recommended that a minimum average of one footcandle
per square foot be provided for general illumination and
security. (Sec. 5-141(a).) F Lv.. \ 1_ -1-- ('-<<"",cf
-,.,I.- "'-~ S(?'-'C' d- '"';1'.... "5{'
feet of the fire
S' ~'" ~~ t G -J.tM.. h 'j d ~,^-..Jr
7AB
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
MUNICIPAL COMPLEX
PARKING LOT VARIANCE
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-121
TO: Chairman and Members
Planning and Zoning Board
THRU: Timothy P. Cannon -r(/
Interim Planning Director
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden
Assistant City Planner
DATE: May 4, 1990
SUBJECT: City of Boynton Beach Municipal Complex
Parking Lot Variance - File No. 466
Section 5-145(c)(4) of the Code of Ordinances requires that when
a variance to Section 5, Article X, Parking Lots is requested,
the Technical Review Board must forward to the Planning and
Zoning Board a recommendation, and that the recommendation
forwarded is to be made a part of the public hearing proceedings.
To that end, this memorandum is forwarded, consistent with
Section 5-145(c)(4).
Bill DeBeck, agent for the City of Boynton Beach, has requested a
variance to Section 5-142 (h) (7) of the Parking Lot Regulations
which prohibits more than two (2) driveways from any property per
street frontage. The site plan approved for the subject
property, the City Municipal Complex, permitted two driveways
from N.E. 1st Avenue, consistent with the Parking Lot
Regulations; one to provide access to the parking garage ana one
to provide access to the 51 space parking lot (see Exhibit "A").
In this instance, the applicant is requesting approval for a
third driveway onto N.E. 1st Avenue. This driveway is proposed
as a second ingress and egress to the parking lot as shown in
Exhibit "B". For an explanation of the code requirement, the
nature of the variance requested, and the variance justification,
please refer to the attached Notice of Public Hearing and
application.
On Tuesday, May 1, 1990, the Technical Review Board (TRB) met to
reevaluate the driveway design for the City Municipal Complex
in order to determine if the variance is justified. It should be
noted that the driveway requested is already in place. This is
due to the fact that before City Hall renovations began, this
driveway served as the only ingress and egress to the parking lot
that was existing in this area at the time. During construction
of the new parking lot, this existing driveway was never removed
as part of the demolition of the old parking lot. This has
enabled the TRB members to evaluate the impact that this third
driveway has had on traffic circulation in the vicinity of the
renovated City Municipal Complex. Many issues were raised
regarding this third driveway as follows:
1. Within the City Hall block, a distance of only 588
feet, there would be six driveways onto N.E. 1st
Avenue if the variance is approved; 3 on the south side
serving the school and a City parking lot, and 3 on the
north side serving the City Municipal Complex. The
purpose of the code limitation of 2 driveways per
frontage is to prevent numerous driveways into heavily
trafficked areas which creates haphazard traffic
movements.
TO: Chairman & Members -2- May 4, 1990
Planning & Zoning Board
SUBJ: City of Boynton Beach Municipal Complex Parking Lot
Variance
2. Discussions regarding the location and number of
driveways took place when the site plan for the
renovation project was designed. The reason the
eastern driveway to the parking lot was preferred over
the western driveway (the driveway in question) was
because the eastern driveway would enable stacking onto
N.E. 1st Avenue of approximately 12 cars waiting to
turn onto Seacrest Boulevard as compared to only 4 or 5
cars from the western driveway. Although the western
driveway would meet the Parking Lot Regulations with
respect to minimum distance from Seacrest Boulevard (30
feet for local streets), N.E. 1st Avenue is a heavily
trafficked local street. This condition might
necessitate a greater distance from Seacrest Boulevard
to the western driveway to safely direct vehicles onto
N.E. 1st Avenue.
3. The eastern driveway to the parking lot closely aligns
with a driveway on the south side of N.E. 1st Avenue
serving the school parking lot. However, the western
driveway to the City parking lot is offset with a
driveway on the south side of N.E. 1st Avenue serving
the school. This offset driveway has resulted in
conflicting turn movements from the school parking lot
and the City parking lot. Consistent with Obj ecti ve
2.5 of the Comprehensive Plan, the Technical Review
Board has always made the recommendation that driveways
be aligned with existing driveways to avoid conflicting
turn movements.
4. Cars from Seacrest Boulevard turning onto N. E. 1st
Avenue, are usually traveling at fast speeds and often
swing out of their driving lane into opposing traffic
on N.E. 1st Avenue. This can delay making a turn out
of the western driveway to the City parking lot until
such cars are beyond this driveway entrance.
5. The City Municipal Complex receives and generates a
great deal of pedestrian traffic which must cross N.E.
1st Avenue in several locations along this block. The
greater the number of driveways permitted onto N.E. 1st
Avenue, the greater the risk of pedestrian and
vehicular conflicts.
6. The school facility originally was going to be deeded
to the City. It was the City's long range plan to
renovate the school site for its own use. The school
now has future plans for the facility; therefore,
school traffic will continue to use N.E. 1st Avenue via
the two existing driveways on the south side of N.E.
1st Avenue serving their parking lot.
7. The issue of whether it was safer to have vehicles
backed-up within the parking lot while waiting to exit
the parking lot (the scenario if only one driveway
serves the 51 car parking lot) was weighed against
whether it was safer to have vehicles backed up onto
N.E. 1st Avenue (the scenario if 2 driveways serve the
parking lot).
After review and discussion, the TRB recommendation was 5-4 in
favor of the variance request for a third driveway onto N.E. 1st
TO: Chairman & Members -3- May 4, 1990
Planning & Zoning Board
SUBJ: City of Boynton Beach Municipal Complex Parking Lot
Variance
Avenue from the City Municipal Complex. Alternatives to the
recommendation that were discussed for possible consideration are
evaluating traffic patterns in the area to determine the
feasility of N.E. 1st Avenue as a one-way street and limiting the
requested driveway to an ingress only driveway.
<7 1
~~K#f~
T1\MBRI J.' EYD
TJH:frb
Encs
A:PM90-121
EXHIBIT "A"
\
, \
't' i
\
I
\
\
,
\
\
\
,
\
\
\
, \
\
\\'
" ,
\. \
, . \
\
.
\
\
\ \
;. .
r
\ .
7"
"
.'- "
"
\
, "
, ~
, ,
, ,
\ \
\ '.'
\ "
l
\-
\
o
, .
..-
r
, .
'.-0
--'- \
, -
'-
,.."' -.
, y,' ~,.
\~.'" \\., \ \ '~\. ::"~:
'" * I ..\
. ',,, : '. ~ .......;.. . 'I'.
,\ ~ L-- 'c:~-- \ !': . \
\ . .' .~ .., -"-'
· 'H. j ':;, ",:"\ \ __ __ __ ',_.1-
.... ). -' ~ ~ '\ 'r----1," 1..-:--".
'......:._-" ' . '!4:
..... -. l.... ___ ,
.~- ..,.
~ ~ :.. '.
's . .': '.,
c:: "..:.
';.; ~ ~
\,
\
,
~\
\ \
\ "
. \
,
'\ '\ "
, ,
. ,
\ \
"
,
i
i\ .
4-
Co'
\ '
\ I., "_,,
~I' ~'~.'H
? ~r ,";'", ,
(', ,. \ ~ ..,
1 , .', ...
, \ ,'\
\
~,
~\ .
U"I\ ~
... ~
IJ. ,
~\ \
,
\
,
~ :
i'
" "
5':
~" --
~\ "
~\ ~
j ~.
\
"
.
\
\
;
\ :
\
\
..
':'::"\
. i '\
\ . \
,i;, \
I, .
\,',
~ "',.
;, \t
'\tt~
.~.~~
,j;;~
' . ;~\..
~~;
,.,';,;,i{" ,
. .
.. :
.--------
~~. ,
.. ". I
' .
':':',
". .
....
," ". .
.... .',
...,....' "
'., ." ,'.
" " '",
;,','.
, ,
, . :: ,',
:..,' :','":
. .',. :.....
. :.... ,
';:"';,\}:','
" .
,.\.,
~
~
, -:~
. '~ll'..:l
:', ,,',i:,\
,': ' \,' ,'" """-
't' ...
'-
~
EXHIBIT "B"
~
G;:'. ..
r:t~ .:. ~~": ~.:
. . . '. ..
-
\)
~
.....
"
'~:7t~ > :,{..~, .
.... .
'..-'.~< ,.
SS\'
-
~
~
, .
~T~~A1: ".
:,:.. .'
j.:' .
~ ...;..... I
::3 . .. '. ,
~t <:,'
-8
~ ---:1 .
[ o'
-
.
~,
~ .1.
!;.:
"
;..i. .'
..~ "
.....:: ,
~ . .
. ..- ...-::-- ...... ~:..:;r.: <:.
...-.. UCIlI!IT ~D
. I . "','"
"
':'""..:...,...i::......~.
'.
"'i,
:
:;: ;;~,!:",
"
~..-li
. : !: ~. '.
....
",
.'
" .'
o. :....
. ~ _I ~ ': '.:
...
~
0'-1
. ,'1
.. .
.
.' .
~.
11
l'
. l
'.
~. .
a
~.
. Ii'
';I
'. .. ~. ...1
: ..... ....~ ~ . a.
. .:.:.~:' ':~' t
'.;.'
.i~~'. :"~ "
,': ...l...~. :\~'.:'
. '.' . . ~ . t ,:.' .
1 .,....~.:.
:. :":':~<~~'.":> ~;'\.' . ~_. :..;.~:/:~':.
: .,:~ -..~ '.,.. . t;' .~',,:t.., .... n
';. . :J',,: :~"~ ": ~ . ;;::~'~;;,'.!~,.,~.'~' ~ ':~,',' ....~~
'. ., ....:...;.....~ .0"..
...:......:., '0 ";~';~", ..: ..:..
.. ..~. .~;...:::~:J~:.:'-.
: 0;. .
'" ,0.,"
~ .......7"
.~f.
. , ."(
" : ;..
.....
0;.'
. ~..
;},:
:~~:~:-: ~,'.:.~_:,'.:~~'.'~...~.~.. .~. ".
..~ ~ . .:f.
, ... ..'~ -. ;.
.... .
'.
:'
:t
...,
....
. .
I'"
. ,
" .
,'-
,
"
~
, ",
"
. . '.'~'
"',. "..,
." ,
.
.:1 .'
'P'.. .. .
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCES
.' :
TO PARKING LOT REGULATIONS
,
City of Boynton Beach, Florida'
.
Planning and Zoning Board
'This application must be filled out completely and accurately and
submitted in two (2) copies to the Planning Department. Incomplete
applications will not be processed.
Please Print Legibly or Type all Information.
.'
" ,J
. '. ~. ~
'.. '. 1 ~ Project. Name of Site Upon Which Parking Lot is Located:
,. ... \
:.
. .
~ ,..". r
.~"",;~.:1 .
',.
,
.,
~ :
"
j.
I
\'..
\, .
,
~
.
~
'RnYMTnt.l 'RllACJ.t Vl~tr.T'PATJ r.nM'PJ li'Y'
I
. ,
,
1I~' .
2. Data this Application is Submitted:
4/4/90
3. Applicant's Name (person or business entity in whose name
this application is made) : t I
.,
I.'
. r.TTY OF ROYN'}'ON RF.Ar:H
100 EAST BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD
Address:
BOYNTON BEACH. FT.ORIDA 3342';
Phone:
7'),R-7474
.'
4. Agent's Name (person, if any, representing applicant):*
BILL DeBECK
Address:
100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BLVD
Phone:
ROYNTON "RF.Ar.H, FT.ORTDA 3342'i
738-7474
* A letter from
';is required.
S.Property Owner's
.
the applicant or owner authorizing the agent
..--.--.....---.... . --. . -----. .
(or Trustee's) Name:
r.TTY OF ROYNTON R~ACU
Address:
100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BLVD
BOYNTON RF.Ar.R, FT.A ~~6.?5
Phone:
.738-7474
6.
Correpondence Address (if different than applicapt or agent) *:
* This is the address to which all agendas, letters, and.
ot~er materials will be mailed.
," 18. Copy of last recorded ~arranty Deed included? (check) ON RECORD
..--.-"'......-........ ..... ... -.. ..-... ... .. -- ..-.. .........--------.- ...-.--...---....-....... .--
.... '19. Letter authorizing agent (if any) included? (check)
. f .
".: 20.' Site plan and survey (2 copies each) attached~ (check)
r... ......-.............._._.... ... .0'. __I'.' .. .. I....... ............... ....... .... .... .. . .... .
. 21. : Number of variances requested on the ,following she'et's;' .
~\ '.~';~ :',:
.~! ~,.~':'
'.~'.~j:~{~~.. . .
P'~'j'"p."~":"
: "'i~::.: .
"lI!.1 ...zI~ .
....~~4..rl.
~< ~~..\t71.'!, .
f'~'. '..~.~'.,.."
~;. .:;li-rl~1 .. .
: J~:~;~~! :: , .
:.::'~~.'1.~,~c;l,
''':''''''''..~: 8
":.. !,'f.1i'...,. ·
~.~:;:.l}f:!. : '
.-: ."~~"
:;,t." =;.c..~i......
~l~i
~~:.;~;;,4~. .
r .
.......
'.
'.
"
.......
.- .
... ~:.,
I. ...
-'
I .
I,
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
~':.. .~.:...~~';. ~ ".... .;...
is'....~~...~(...,:~ J:.'
i2f;t,~i~'O~":o ~.
~
WUc;Ll.. .I..~ (.l.~!:I"\'''\'''''QH''' W
.. I' t.'.
.I.,I,,,....It..-;.&...\;io.Jw ""-44 \..-&&\...0 !:'...\ooou,........""....,
:!: .
OwtiER
(Owner, Buyer, Lessee, Builder, Developer, etc.)
.
Street Address or Location of Site Upon Which Parking Lot.
is Located: . : " ',' , .
. 100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BLVD
ROYNTOllT 'R'F.Ar.H r 'FT.A 11"'1)
Leqal Description of. Site_..~pon Which Parkincp Lot is Located:
, "Lo~s'1 - 15 BOYNTON CENTk- I,
I '
, .
PLAT '600K R PAGE 11
, .
'.
Xntend~d ~~e(s) .of Site 'Upon ~hich Parking Lot is Located:
. ~ ~.
CITY "GOVERNMENT
!
i _,
Developer or Builder:
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
Architect:
MILLER. MEIER, KENYON AND COOPER ASSOCIATES
.'
.
Landscape Architect: MILLER, MEIER, KENYON AND COOPER ASSOCIATES
,.
, \
Site Planner:
Engineer:
'Surveyor:
MILLER, MEIER, KENYON AND COOPER ASSOCIATES
MILLER, MEIER, KENYON AND COOPER ASSOCIATES
'MILLER, MEIER, KENYON AND COOPER ASSOCIATES
Traffic Enqineer:
MILLER, MEIER. KENYON AND COOPER ASSOCIATES
.-:
.' ,
;
.
~ . -- _.
Note:
A separate sheet must be completed for each specific
desiqn'requirement (Sec. 5-141) or permit application
requirement (Sec. 5-142) to which a variance is re-
quested.
. Planning Dept.: 5/82
,I
"
____ .._......-r._..'_'I......'..t..,II.'-:""'..I..to:Y.r,r,.,..JJ,~~...,.."t'V,..' "~"I-""~_._-
.6.. .:
--..~...----""':"'".,.. .
'.'~ J.:;;;;.;
J< .is.~:.. .
.f .'
I . .
.
/ The undersiqned hereby petitions the planning and Zoning Board to
qrant. t.o the petitioner a variance to Article X "Parking Lots",
of Chapter 5, "Building, Housing and Construction Regulations," of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, as it
pertains to the property described in this application, and for the
reasons stat.ed below:
Sect.ion, Subsection, and Paragraph number of specific requirement
to which variance is requested, and exact language contained in
the Code:
5-142 (h) (7) No more than two (2) drivewavs shall be oermit~pn
<.
from any propertv. Where properties abut more than nn~ (1)
public or private riqht-of-way. additional drivewayS may be
permitted depending upon traffic volumes, but in no instance shall
the number of driveways exceed two (2) on each street.
Nature of Variance Requested:
, -ro.. ALLOW 'THREE. '3) dt'::'veway~ ente,r,inR.
ONTO SE ,1ST AVENUE,"!N ONE lltOCK'AREA
,St.at.ement. of Special Conditions, Hardships, or Other Reasons Justi-
fyinq the Requested Variance (attach additional sheets if necessary) :
THIRD ,ENTRANCE IS A PARKING GARAGE.
'tWO (2). DRI.VES NEEDED ON CITY,~.HALL LOT FOR 'PROPER AND SAFE :n<.A~~FIC FLOW.
(I) (We) understand that this application and all papers or plans
submit.ted herewith become a part of the permanent records ,of the
Planninq and zoning Board.
(I) (We) hereby certify that the above statements and the state-
ments or showings made in any papers or plans submitted herewith
are true to the best of (my) (our) knowledge. This application
will not be accepted unless signed b~; ~~. ~
Siqna.ture of Applicant or Agent: ~e&-/\
Date. 'i//~9tJ'
Planninq Qep~. 5/82
. ,
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning & Zoning Board of
the CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, shall meet at 7:30 P M.
on Tuesday, May 8, 1990, at City Hall Commission Chambers,
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., Boynton Beach, to consider an
application for a PARKING LOT VARIANCE on the following
described property:
Owner/
Applicant:
Legal
Description:
,Location:
The City of Boynton Beach
BOYNTON CENTER, Lots 2 - 25
Plat Book 8, Page 12
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Requested
Variance:
Variance:
RELIEF FROM ARTICLE X - PARKING LOTS,
Required Improvements - Driveways
Section 5-l42(h)(7), No more than two
(2) driveways shall be permitted from
any property. Where properties abut
more than one (1) public or private
right-of-way, additional driveways may
be permitted depending upon traffic
volumes, but in no instance shall the
number of driveways exceed two (2) on
each. street.
Proposed
Variance:
To allow three (3) driveways entering
onto S. E. 1st Avenue in one block area.
Third entrance is a parking garage.
Two (2) drives needed on city hall lot
for proper and safe traffic flow.
All interested parties are notified to appear at said hearing
in person or by attorney and be heard. Any person who decides
to appeal any decision of the Planning & Zoning Board with
respect to any matter considered at this meeting will need a
, record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,
which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which
the appeal is to be based.
Proposed Use:
SUZANNE M. KRUSE, CITY CLERK
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
PUBLISH: BOYNTON BEACH NEWS
APRIL 19 & 26, 1990
p/parklot
cc: City Manager
Mayor & CAty Commission
C ~ ,t Y.., A,.t,~.R~]l~y
Cl,ty.!:' pJ;:.oneJ;',.:,,'"
, ' ", ,i!II.. ,."II' .
Recording Secretary
File
" ",'
,.
,', ','
,', ..........
.... I......
.... . .
,,: .::,'.:''''
" ........ .,'
'-'I' . ',: .:' ..
. 'ar.
;"'. ":::
, "
'~,~:il;> .
. .... :.......
...,.........
, .........
. ".V",
,":':it
," .....
.. .. "
"
L. U V 1'\ I I U I~ IVI1\ r-'
'. '.. .. . .,..
CITY OF BOYNT.ON :a"EACH"i
. ..
MUNICIPAL COMPLEX
..I..... 11.~
.~
p
.
.
I
,
,
,
,
,
,
I
,
----
,
,
I
,
.
,
.
.
,
I
I
.
.
'0
1/8
1/4
.-
r-.
! "0 .4 0, 'soo
1600 FEgT
,.
51
~
I .. ~ . of...
SPACE BELOW THIS LINE'FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
,
Date Received by Planning Dept.:
Date Reviewed by Technical Review Board:
Dates of Advertising for Public Hearing:
Date of Public Hearing before Planning and Zoning Board:
Action:
Approved
Aye
Denied
Nay
Stipulations:
(
,
..
Planning Dept. 5/82
---. "~~ ':.~~.1~'f.U ;i:'~
..
General Information for Applications for
Variances to Parkinq Lot Requlations
~
1.
All applications for variances to the Parking Lot Regula-
tions must be ~eceived and accepted by the City Planner
at least thirty (30) days prior to the regular meeting
of the Planning and Zoning Board.
2. All variances which are requested in connection with the
construction or reconstruction of a particular parking lot
are covered by a single application and a single filing fee of
four-hundred dollars ($400.00). However, a separate sheet must
be completed for each specific design requirement (Sec. 5-l4l)
or permit application requirement (Sec. 5-142) to which a
variance is requested. In addition, a copy of the last
reco~ded Warranty Deed must be included with the.application..
:
j
I
!
i
r
I
--.....;.".
~: _it-,I-
.
3. An application for a variance may be submitted at the same
time that an application for site plan approval or approval
of. subdivision ,construction plans is submitted. If possible,
the variance application should be submitted at this time.
The application fee for a variance must be paid in addition
to the application fee for site plan approval or approval
of subdivision construction plans.
- :... .-><-~~.. ."
'. ..~ .,--~ -c
~
I
.
4. All parking lot variance applications are reviewed by the
Technical Review Board (TRB) which consists of the depart-
ment heads of those City departments concerned with land
development. The TRB may recommend to the Planning and
Zoning Board that the variance request be approved, approved
with modifications,; or denied. The applicant is not re-
quired to attend the TRB meeting. The applicant will be
notified by mail as to the modifications recommended by the
TRB. The applicant should be prepared to respond to all
TRB recommendations at the hearing before the Planning and
Zoning Board.' "
5. All applications for variances are advertised for public
hearing in a newspaper of general circulation. If possible,
the public hearing will be scheduled for the same Planning and
Zoning Board meeting that the site plan or subdivision con-
struction plans are reviewed. At the public hearing be-
fore the Planning ,and Zoning Board, any person may comment
favorably or unfavorably on' the variance request. The
applicant or his agent must attend this meeting.
6. The Planning and Zoning.Board gives final approval or denial
to parking lot variances, and may approve, approve with
modifications, ,or deny such variances.
.
,
'.
!!
;J
~1
'I
1
:1
:!
'I
J
i
1
'1
"
1
7. Prior to obtaining a building permit, all modifications re-
quired by the Planning and Zoning Board must be shown on
the site plan or subdivision construction plans.
8. Approval of a variances lapses when approval of the site
plan lapses (one (I) year after the date of approval) or
approval of subdivision construction plans (six (6) months
after the date of approval). Failure to conform to the
conditions imposed by the Planning and Zoning Board will
also invalidate the variance.
9. All applicants with approved site plans or subdivision con-
struction plans, or approved parking lot variances, which
at a later date request an additional variance, will be re-
quired to submit a complete variance application and filing
fee, and will be subject to all Code requirements in effect
at the time the additional variance is requested.
Planning Dept. 5/82
,;
l
'j ,-
,L:;J.~~:-,~:~;T:-;:-:';':' ".: '.,:::.:-~,;~:".'~ ,);;;~'Y' ",Z5':::-zm;- .w".
...:!JIIIF-:-:---' ..__:"6_-~~::::::
MEMORANDUM
TO: Sue Kruse, City Clerk
FROM: James J. Golden, Senior City Planner
DATE: April 10, 1990
SUBJECT: City of Boynton Beach Municipal Complex - Parking Lot
Variance
Accompanying this memoranmdum you will find a
application for the above referenced request.
plan and survey will be forwarded in the near
for this application has been waived as it is
copy of the
Copies of the site
future. The fee
a City request.
Please advertise this request for a public hearing before the
Planning and Zoning Board at the May 8, 1990 meeting.
"/w
. GOLDEN
JJG:frb
Encs