The URL can be used to link to this page

CORRESPONDENCE @ne~(~i9k COMPANY, INC. 8330 WOODFIelD CROSSING BLVD. P.O. BOX <40177 (317) 253.3606 INDIANAPOLIS. INDIANA 46240 Mr. Tom Clark City Engineer Boynton Beach, Florida 211 S. Federal Highway P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Dear Mr. Clark: EXPRESS MAIL January 6, 1989 Re: Melear PUD Enclosed is the bond for the cost of signalization of the intersection of Congress Avenue and Sandalwood Drive. The . posting of this bond was a condition of the November 8, 1988 approval of the amended Master Plan for the Mealear PUD. JTB/dc encl. cc: Mr. Carmen ~~unziato (w/copy of bond) \ """ A. .:((. ~,'" c' """...... . . 'W Sincerely, GENE B. GLICK COMPANY, INC. ...--wh. ( ~ames T. Bisesi ~/ ltECEIVED JAM 9 1900 FLANN1NG DE.pr~' to" -, .~ & ri"," , j./ :? -<< ~ :,; 'J " 'i " :6 J X i' e l- I ,~- - s ~. CITY of _mt,__ c ----,......l:::j""~:;ijrt-~NI.. . ~~-"'"'IoI~R!~-~~"".t::I1 j '~C.ll " ..~.~... P. Q. Box 310 -- ! . - __ r.~" Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 .~-- - , __ __ . (407.) 738-7490 OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR 30 November 1988 Mr. Javier Lopez Palm Beach County Engineering Department PO Box 2429 West Palm Beach, FL 33402 Dear Javier: Accompanying this letter you will find correspondence related to the issuance of permits at the Melear Planned Unit Development located in Boynton Beach. As a condition of the approval of the PUD, development of the final 50% of the project was conditioned upon the letting of contracts to construct Hypoluxo Road as a four-lane divided highway from Congress Avenue to 1-95. Ms. Rezzonico advises in her letter that contracts have now been let. Will you please confirm her findings. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH /bks cc: Carmen S. Annunziato, AICP Planning Director City Manager Ann Marie Rezzonico Central File .JONES, FOSTER, .JOHNSTON & STUBBS, P.A. COUNSEL WilLIAM A FOSTER ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS FLAGLER CENTER TOWER 505 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE ELEVENTH FLOOR P. Q. DRAWER E WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402.3475 (407) 659.3000 FAX: (407) 832-1454 OTHER LOCATION Sli1 s, e. 8th STREET, SUITE 101 PEtRA'" BEACH. FLORIDA ~ LARRY e ALEXANDER GEORGE H. BAILEY KEVIN C BEUTTENMULLER MICHAEL 0 BROWN MARGARET L. COOPER REBECCA G. DOANE RANDY 0 ELUSON L MARTIN FLANAGAN SCOTT G HAWKINS THORNTON M. HENRY PETER S, HOLTON HARRY A. JOHNSTON, II J A. JURGENS MARK e. KLEINFELD CHARLES e. KOVAL MICHAEL T. KRANZ JOHN l,RQUX JOHN BLAIR McCRACKEN TIMOTHY E. MONAGHAN JOHN C. RANDOLPH ANN MARIE G, REZZONlCO ANDREW R ROSS STEVEN J. ROTHMAN PETER A. SACHS JOEL T. STRAWN SIDNEY A. STUBBS. JR AlLEN Fl. TOMLINSON JOHN S. TFl,MPER MICHAEL p, WALSH H. ADAMS WEAVER PAUL C. WOLFE November 21, 1988 Mr. Carmen P. Annunziato Planning Director City of Boynton Beach 200 North Seacrest Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 RE: Melear PUD - Master Plan Modification Dear Mr. Annunziato: For your records I am enclosing a photocopy of your letter to me of May 11, 1988 regarding the release of the final 50% of the residential units and all of the commercial property in the captioned PUD. It is my understanding that the contracts have now been let to Hardrive, and that construction will begin i,n January. Therefore, I request that you confirm this in writing and also confirm to me that the units are now able to be released. I look forward to hearing from you as soon as possible. Sincerely, ~ri" AMR:pr Enclosure RECEIVED JV 27 1988 PLlc: ;~ING DEPT. CITY of BOYNTON BEACH . ~~ .. . 200 N. Seacrest Blvd. Post Office Box 310 Boynton Bea~h, FL 33435 (305) ,738-7490 -- ~ -:---- . .... .-.. - - ~'I.""''': . :~c:;___'__~'::'-::'~=. ' ~~J' . ..,; I ":"~.;::~~~;;~~;~:_~ TI~::~~' :'f? -r"':"'~ ~,-i-~ ":-., ~"~'ki;,~1 ~"r.>...~ - 'I . -- ~ J..C1........ .".. \i; ..---. _ -.......... . . :--:-..'1!'~~........ ...~. ~ .... ~~ -.i- '~-??~~~ir' ,! OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR May 11, 1988 Ann Marie Rezzonico, Esq. Johnston, Sasser, Randolph & Weaver, P.A. 310 Okeechobee Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33402 Re: Melear PUD-Master Plan Modification Dear Ms. Rezzonico: In response to your letter dated May 4, 1988, requesting clarification of the release of the final 50% of the units and the commercial property within the Melear Planned Unit Development, please be advised that building permits for the final 50% of the residential units and all of the commercial property cannot be issued until such time that Palm Beach County '. lets the contract for the construction of Hypoluxo Road as a four-lane section from Congress Avenue to 1-95. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Yours very truly, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH C~ . fL r ;~ CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, AICP PLANNING DIRECTOR CSA:ro cc Central File , -, ~(ECEIVED DEe ;?, 1983 PLANNING Depf, M E M 0 RAN D U ~ ..=~ December 1, 1983 To: Carmen Annunziato, City Planner Re: City Resolution No. 83-JJJJ - 0000 As you can see from the attached letter from John Sansbury, County Administrator, the Resolution concerning annexation and rezoning has been received by the Board of County Commissioners. ~L ;; c;4 <<;'ei L. Cheney City Manager PLC:mh Att. Board of County Commissioners Peggy B, Evatt, Chairman Ken Spillias Dennis P. Koehler Dorothy Wilken Bill Bailey County Administrator John C, Sansbury November 29, 1983 Mr. Peter L. Cheney, City Manager City of Boynton Beach P. O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33435-0310 Dear Mr. Cheney: This letter acknowledges receipt of Resolution No. 83-JJJJ expressing the Council's desire to participate in the early design discussions for North Seacrest Boulevard and notifying the Board of County Commissioners of its concerns concerning the design of North Seacrest Boulevard. Please be advised that the Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners officially received and filed the resolution in their meeting of November 29, 1983. Copies of the resolution were forwarded to the County Engineer for review and recommendations. This letter also acknowledges receipt of Resolution No. 83-0000 requesting permission to rezone a certain parcel of land being annexed to the City of Boynton Beach from Palm Beach County Zoning Classification AG to the City of Boynton Beach Zoning Classification of Planned Unit Development with a land use intensity of 4.0 and from County land use of Medium-Medium High Density to City land use classification of Moderate Density Residential. Please be advised that the Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners officially received and filed the resolution in their meeting of November 29, 1983. Copies of the resolution were forwarded to the Planning, Zoning and Building Department for their review and recommendations. Very truly yours, ~e'~/h- John C. Sansbury County Administrator :' f~'}~ JCS/lmg NOV 1983 '~'~CEtVr ',,1 . '" r,,?:u,r"'.r , ~~rl CC Herb Kahlert, County Engineer Robert Basehart, PZ&B , BOX 1989 . WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 /' ,'. -- i ~ ./ /?? ~ CITY of BOYNTON BEACH ~ Q,.. . (..' :' ' ..' eceive pate lfime _ 120 N.E. 2nd AVENUE P.O. BOX 310 OYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33435-0310 (305) 734-811 1 February 28, 1983 Mr. Alan Ciklin Boose Ciklin & Martens Law Offices The Concourse 2000 palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 " RE: Melear P.U.D. Dear Mro Ciklin: I am responding to your letter of February 8, 1983, and your comments concerning recent attempts to resolve development problems for the Melear tract. As I understand your letter, the current major concern with which you are now faced has to do with a "Neighborhood Commercial Pod" within the P.U.D. and you indicate that you have been in- formed that any commercial within the P.U.D. is not acceptable and will be opposed. I believe that you may have misunderstood comments that have been made concerning your commercial podo The City's Code concerning P.U.D. provides that a maximum of five to ten percent of the total land of the P.U.D. can be considered for commercial activities and, therefore, commercial activities are accepted in the City's P.U.D. 1 I. I believe the issues surrounding the proposed commercial activity in the Melear P.U.D. may have more to do with location and access than with whether or not the use is permitted. The City code indicates that commercial uses should serve the needs of the P.U.D. and not the general needs of the surrounding area, that the commercially located land should not generally front on the perimeter streets and that. preferrably, the commercial should be centrally located in the P.U.D. This is similar to the County regulations which require that "access to commercial facilities - Mr. Alan Ciklin Re: Melear P.U.D. February 28. 1983 - ,. -, :tf -2- shall be from an arterial or collector which is part of the interior circulation system within the planned unit development. No commercial facility shall maintain frontage or direct physical access on any arterial or collector bordering or traversing the planned Unit Development tract." I do not understand the basis for the Melear family's "collective decision" that they can no longer afford to continue to give and expend funds without some sort of reasonable positive assurance from the City that the project can move ahead as planned since I believe there has been an indication of a resolution of the den- sity questions and this letter confirms that commercial develop- ment is indeed a permitted part of the P.U.D. However, I respect the Melear's decision to hold in abeyance further discussions on this P.U.D. for a period of time that satisfies their needs. Even though the Melear family has decided that they do not cur- rently have a need for water and sewer connections to the Boynton Beach utility system, it is obvious that these connections will be needed at some time in the future for the eventual development of this tract. I believe it is proper that the utility connection agreement remain in effect as a part of the public records of the City of Boynton Beach. Obviously. the Melear family should make its own decisions con- cerning the proper time to proceed with the development of their land and the City respects their decision process. I hope this responds to your letter and will provide a correct understanding of the factors surrounding development of this tract in Boynton Beach i.e., density levels, commercial activity and utility service. please let me know if I can be of further assistance in this matter. Sincerely, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH < Ovt ~/ C'0 {(et~r L. Cheney city Manager PLC : j c ..JAMES W. VANCE WILLIAM P. DONEY Received L....W OF"F'"ICES JAMES W. VANOE, P.A.Date SUITE 200, BARRISTERS BUILDING 1615 FORUM PLACE lime WEST PALM BEAOH, FLORIDA 33401 ~;4I~ ~ TELEPHONE: (305) 68,4-55044 August 24, 1983 Alan J. Cik1in, Esquire Boose, Cik1in & Martens Eighth Floor, Concourse 2000 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Re: Melear PUD Dear Alan: This letter is in response to your letter to Jim Vance of August 1, 1983. I have reviewed the form documents that you have submitted to us and the same would appear adequate to satisfy the City's requirements as to unified control, so long as the property subject to the declaration constitutes the entire PUD and, as set forth, the restrictions run with the land. '7jf;L" WILLIAM P. DONEY, WPD/sjw / cc: Carmen Annunziato ' G>> 120N.E. 2nd AVENUE P.O. BOX 310 BOYNTON BEACH, FlORtDA334J5.0310 (305)734-8111 ~ . -, - -r; c -. . ',;..)"f,t/",J, . ~e.r::P.~~"'~"~IoolI....t:-!~= ~ .~otil . .:,~. '~,II~I --..., ~ - -j--~~~' , .-'. , - r '.::--- - . !:::. . _ '/.J-'- ;.--- CITY of BOYNTON BEACH OFFICE OF THE CITY PLANNER 23 August 1983 Allen Ciklin, Esq. 2000 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Dear Allen: In reference to the Melear Annexation, please be advised that a pre-hearing conference involving the City Technical Review Board and your technical staff has been set for 9:00 A.M. on September 6, 1983. This conference will be held in the Planning Department Conference Room. Yours very truly, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH /' C ~_~ '-' c~~:z:.. , Carmen S. Annunziato City Planner /bks cc: City Manager Technical Review Board Central File l;,'l.lrd of (-OIlIlI~ Con1Jlli,,,i(_~IH'r... Coun1\ Admini"tr;tlllr l\'~'~~', 1-: [\all. Cll.lirm:m }d'll SpiJlj;l.... "in: Chairman Ih'illli, 1'. Koehler Dl1ruthy '....ilkl.n Hill lLoile, .I. '!l;j (' S:,!.. '!'\ September I, 1983 Dcpartmrnt of Engj;lur"IQ ,If!;l Public ~.,'(J.~ '. H. F. Ka1,lcn Coun'iY E,-:gine>ef Mr. Carmen S. Annunziato City Planner . City of Boynton Beach 120 N. E. 2nd Avenue Boynton Beach, FL 33435 , . i i f I , . SUBJECT: Proposed Melear, P.D.D. Dear Mr. Annunziato: This is to confirm our meeting of August 30 with yourself and the developer of Melear, P.D.D., in which the developer agreed to certain conditions which would allow his project to meet the requirements of the traffic performance standard. The proposed development is a category A project, i.e., one having a significant impact on a road or roads which are already operating at or above level of service D. As this is the case, the project must limit it's traffic to less than a significant impact on two category A road links, those being Lantana Road and Hypoluxo Road between Congress Avenue and 1-95. Our calculations indicate that project development should be limited to 50% of the residential units, with the balance of the residential units and all of the commercial not being allowed to develop until Lantana Road and Hypoluxo Road are constructed as four lane facilities. Additionally, this project should be required to: 1) Dedicate 108 feet of right of way for and construct Miner Road across the project's north property frontage. 2)a) Reimburse the County for the cost of constructing left turn lanes at the project's entrance on Congress Avenue and at Miner Road. These turn lanes will be included in the Congress Avenue four laning project currently under contract. The County will bill the developer for this work based on unit prices at the time of Congress Avenue construction. b) Construct right turn lanes on Congress Avenue at the project's entrance and at Miner Road. These turn lanes should be constructed at the time the project's entrance road and Miner Road are built. 3) Pay the cost of signalization at the following intersections, when war- ranted, as determined by the County Engineer: a) Congress Avenue and Miner Road. b) Entrance Road and Miner Road. c) Entrance Road and Congress Avenue. 4) Pay "Fair Share Impact Fee" upon issuance of building permits. BOX 2429 WEST PALi\1 BEACH, FLORIOA 33402 (305) GS44000 --~------ ------- ---~- -.----..---- Page Two As we discussed, it is anticipated that the City will enter into a formal agreement with the developer to ensure that all of these conditions are complied with in order that this project would meet the requirements of the traffic performance standard. The opportunity to cOIT@ent is, sincerely appreciated. If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Charles R. Walker, Jr., P.E. Director, Traffic Division CRWect cc: Stan Redick ~ ~'eiv..... Pate rune MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Carmen Annunziato City Planner DATE: August 26, 1983 RE: Melear Annexation - Departmental Review The overall growth projections of the N.W. Congress Avenue corridor will have significant impact upon park and recreation services and facilities. The annexation of this property will strengthen this impact, as 1,005 additional units will translate into over 2,000 people. While this development and others already approved for development do include some private recreation facilities, they generally do not include facilities such as lighted athletic fields, auditoriums, public beaches, boat ramps, major recreation centers, or programs such as youth and adult athletic leagues, day camps, playgrounds, and a multitude of other instructional and social programs offered by this department. The development of Motorola and the Boynton Mall will create a family- oriented population increase which will place greater demands on the above mentioned facilities. The nature of the overall N.W. section expansion will require the continual provision of capital outlay funds, along with operational funds to provide for personnel, materials, and maintenance. ~-,,'%..r;2k Charles C. Frederick '-, Recreation & Park Director CCF:as Attachment CC: John Wildner, Park Supt. ./ iBC:X::a: ClllKUn & mARfeITS LAW OFFICES WILLIAM R. BOOSE. III ALAN J. CIKLlN. P.A. ANN I W. COLLETTE STEPHEN FRY RICHARD L. MARTENS. P.A. KERRY R. SCHWENCKE R February 1983 / Mr. Peter L. Cheney City Manager City of Boynton Beach 120 N.E. 2nd Avenue Post Office Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33435 i, 'i't.\\ '&O~"^ ._,.._...........i~ r1'-:' " ." .-~.! ~:-~:~~~>.' Re: Melear P.U.D. Dear Peter: As you know, we have been attempting to resolve our development problems with the City of Boynton Beach for several months. We have met, rethought and revised our site plan and development several times based on the input of staff and the City Planning Board. In fact, based on their input and our desire to cooperate, we reduced the density on the subject location from a County recommended 8 to 12 units per acre to 6.5 units per acre. Despite our efforts to cooperate and reach an accord with the City, it appears to the Melear family that each time we ~ive, something else is then required. Each of the site plans that have been submitted to the City reflected a neighborhood commercial pod within the P.U.D. We are now informed that any commercial within the P.U.D. is not acceptable and will be opposed. We now believe that despite our efforts to compromise and cooperate, each time we do so something more is requested. The Melear family has made the collective decision that they can no longer afford to continue to give and expend funds without some sort of reasonable, positive assurance from the City that the project can move ahead as planned. Therefore, based on these factors, the Melear family has decided not to proceed with annexation of the property into Boynton Beach, nor for the use of the water and sewer connections set forth in the Annexation Agreement. I should also remind you that the proposed development which was submittetl to the City Commission <l.t the time we entered into the Annexation Agreement was at 8 to 12 units per acre, and not 6.5. Based on the fact that we will not I I IL ~IGHTH fL()()R'.1 HE ConcOURSE' 2000 PAlM B€'1CH ~ Si.VO. !.lIEST PALM GEflCi. FLORIDA, 33409 ' [305] 6-39' 9595 ":'J.k! 510.%2'~-:- Mr. Peter L. Cheney 8 February 1983 Page Two be using water and sewer connections in the City of Boynton Beach, I would request that the City take appropriate action to remove the Annexation Agreement from the public records. In any event, the Melear family is disappointed that this was the result of their concerted efforts. Hopefully, sometime in the future, the City will reanalyze their position and be able to rechannel the project on a more positive basis. Thank you for your cooperation and if you have any questions or comments, please don't hesitate to call me. AJC/lab cc: Mr. Larry Melear Mr. Carmen Annunziato Harry Johnston, Esquire .i " R'rei"d~ic: Date / ~h/YI Time () - MEMORANDUM February 14, 1983 To: Carmen Annunziato, City Planner Re: Alan J. Ciklin Letter of February 8, 1983 Melear P.U.D. Please review the attached letter and provide me with a written response to the items raised in the letter. After I receive your comments, I will review it, prepare a draft response to Mr. Ciklin and then review it with the City Attorney. It is my current feeling, pending further discussion with the city Attorney and then with the City council, that the annexation agreement that has been signed is binding and cannot be removed from the public records. Furthermore, the only way this piece of property can be developed is with the city's water and sewer. In the meantime of course, if the Melear family wishes to hold the property as vacant land there are no steps that the City would take to prevent this. /Zc/ l c4 f!et~r L. Cheney City Manager PLC:mh . MEMORANDUM February 16, 1983 TO: Peter L. Cheney, City Manager FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato, City Planner RE: Alan J. Ciklin letter of February 8, 1983/Melear Property consistent with your request, I have reviewed Alan Ciklin's letter of February 8, 1983 regarding the Melear family property . which is located on the west side of Congress Avenue between L.W.D.D. Canals #20 and 21. As noted in Mr. Ciklin's letter, Mr. Melear appeared before the Planning and Zoning Board to discuss the issues related to gross and net density. Following the presentation of plan materials and graphics, it was generally agreed upon that an appropriate gross density for the Melear property would be approximately six units per acre. In response to the Planning and Zoning Board comments, M~. Melear revised his concept plan to reflect density in the gross and _ net which were consistent with the issues raised at the Planning and Zoning Board. The gross density reflected on the revised plan was 6.5 dwelling units per acre. Concerning commercial uses in PUD'S, our a maximum of from 5 to 10% of the total land area zoning depending upon the intensity of land use. qualifications as follows: code provides for proposed for re- There are, however, l. the needs of area. That the land proposed for commercial uses should serve the PUD, and not the general needs of the surrounding 2. The commercially located lands should not generally front on the perimeter streets. -- 3. The commercially used lands should preferably be · centrally located in the PUD. The proposed location for commercial use in the Melear concept plan is on the south side of the entrance road at Congress Avenue, directly across from the Dos Logos PUD. Although the total acreage proposed for commercial uses (3.1 acres) is consistent with ordinance require- ments, the location proposed, in my opinion, violates three of the four standards listed above. CSA:bks cc: Central File Hr. Alan ciklin Re: Melear P.U.D. February 25, 1983 -3- cc: Mayor and city council Planning and zoning Board Larry Melear Harry Johnston, Esquire James vance, city Attorney carmen Annunziato, city planner perry Cessna, utilities Director I CITY of BOYNTON BEACH P.Q BOX 310 120 N.E 2ND AVENUE BOYNTO.... BEACH. fLORIDA 33435 13051734-8111 Mr. Alan J. ~klin Boose, Ciklin\& Martens 8th. FIr., The Concourse 2000 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. W. Palm Beach, Fl. 33409 Dear Mr. Ciklin: J ~ t... -- ~~':;)('rJ'~ - tt..Ul:.ttE..:::::...::;.Er-j;;;;iJ:~J::.t:c I .~_:j~J'! ....-- ''jL ~ J= I j~r:'~~::F~~r:~ ~H - , , - ~~~ ~~~~3ljlif/? _ - ,17'::;.;"0- :::--'/->~- December 6, 1982 Please be advised that a discussion of densities in the North Congress area of Boynton Beach has been set for Dec. 14, 1982 at 7: 30 P.M. with the Planning and Zoning Board. In particular, the issues associated with the Melear tract will be addressed. appreciated. Your attendance at this meeting would be greatly CSA:mpc CC: City Manager Utilities Director Central File Yours very truly, ~ OF BOYNTON BEACH Ltt171~?f/rd. 0z-n-u<?1~d;, Carmen S. Annunziato GI City Planner /,?,,~ " MEMORANDUM November 30, 1982 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Re: Melear P.U.D. The last piece of land to be reviewed for development on the west side of Congress Avenue, north of Old Boynton Road, is the Melear Tract. As you know, the owner of this tract executed an agreement for water service outside the City Limits (see attached). with this agreement, they agreed ..."in consideration of the privilege of receiving water service from said CITY, that the execution of this Agreement is considered a voluntary petition for annexation." For your information, I have attached correspondence and memorandum relative to the Melear P.U.D. approval process, which I am forward- ing to you. I don't feel that the matter should be coming before the City Council for consideration until after it has been reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Board and appropriate Staff and Planning & Zoning Board recommendations have been prepared for City Council consideration. You can see from the attached correspondence and a memo to Carmen Annunziato that it is being suggested that this matter be placed on the next Planning & Zoning Board Agenda for consideration by that Body, if the Chairman of the Planning & Zoning Board agrees to including it on the Agenda. (~L ,_/ 04/ Ut:ei>L. Cheney city Manager PLC :mh ''',.~ r:; ~~te~ ' Lo//?:;:?4-~/ TJme - ,/:' <I7J --- -- Atts. cc: City Planner Central Files M EM 0 RAN DUM November 30, 1982 To: Carmen Annunziato, City Planner Re: Melear P.U.D. You have received a copy of a letter from Alan ciklin dated November 23, 1982. Please arrange to prepare a planning Staff recommendation on this matter and place the issue on the next Planning & zoning Board Agenda if the Chairman of the Board so approves. It seems to me that this is the best way to get a policy determination on the possible density of the develop- ment of the Melear P.U.D. rE<A. ~h~ city Manager PLC:mh Att. cc: city Attorney Central Files . . iBtXEE (1IHUn &. mARfens LAW OFFICES WILLIAM R. BOOSE. III ALAN J. CIKLlN. P.A. ANNI W. COLLETTE STEPHEN FRY RICHARD L. MARTENS, P.R. KERRY R. SCHWENCKE 23 November 1982 ,I Mr. Peter L. Cheney City Manager City of Boynton Beach 120 N.E. 2nd Avenue Post Office Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33435 Re: Melear P.U.D. ~i''].$2 3031" /.~ 'k. 7. /.{? ,.' c. i!? \lOll 19a1 1 !~ ~U, ~ 1 ('f '.',r::~t:~'dr~: \ N 1."....~~,.1:~ - \~~\ f"'O<t:<i t..~nnG;:.-. \.. ~ ,~.,.~ OHler- \~- '-.(? '. /;'/ J> '-:~.L~~_nl qt ~_l Dear Peter: Thank you for your letter of November 17,1982. We are ready to appear before the ~lanning and Zoning Board for an informal discussion of the appropriate development of densities for the subject parcel of property. At your earliest convenience, please schedule me for such an appearance so that we make make a presentation to them in an informal setting and to discuss the relative merits of the the Melear proposal and densities. Regarding the other issues as you see them, I offer the following comments: 1. My client has entered into a voluntary agreement to annex the property into the City of Boynton and is ready, willing and able to comply with the terms of that agreement. We certainly agree that the City of Boynton Beach is the appropriate means of supply as it relates to utilities. The only question that continues to arise, is that there is nothing included in the agreement that requires the Melears to proceed through governmental approvals in the City. However, we may not have a problem with proceeding in the City for governmental approval once we have a feel for what the Planning and Zoning Board determines to be an appropriate density for the site. 2. I have reviewed Carmen Annunziato's comparison of gross density and have no argument with it but for the caveat that the densities reflect over-all project densities and not necessarily effective densities immediately adjacent EIGHTH FlOOR, THE concOURSE, 2000 PALM BEACH lRHES BlVD. WEST PALM BEACH. FlO!<IllA . 33409 . 1305] 6W' 9595 TUJi 51O'952'J64.~ c. Mr. Peter Cheney 23 November 1982 Page Two to the project. This can certainly be discussed in detail before the Planning and Zoning Board. 3. I do not necessarily agree that the appropriate density for the the Melear P.U.D. is entirely dictated by the utilities the City is willing to provide. If the City lacks sufficient capacity to serve the Melear P.U.D. at the density recommended by the County's Comprehensive Plan (8 to 12 units per acre) then one of the alternatives my clients would have, would be to wait until further capacity is available. Additionally, when we requested service to the City, we indicated at that time that the density allocated to the property was 8 to 12 units per acre and there was no attempt to suggest anything but that density to the City. Based on that representation, the City approved the Agreement for Water and Sewer Service. Additionally, the Congress Lakes P.U.D. approved at 11.20 units per acre is recommended on the previous County Comprehensive Plan at the same density as the Melear P.U.D., i.e., 3 to 5 units per acre. It appears, therefore, that the City did not base its density for the Congress Lakes P.U.D. merely on the availability of utilities or the willingness of the City to grant utilities, but also other factors as well as such as surrounding land use and intensity. Again, thank you for your continued cooperation in this matter. I am still optimistic that once we are to meet with the Planning and &oning Board for an informal discussion, we will be able to come to a meeting of the minds and then proceed to annex the property and obtain our governmental approvals in the City of Boynton Beach. If you have any further questions or comments, please don't hesitate to call me. I shall await your notice of our appearance before the Planning and oning Board. A.JC/1ab cc: Mr. Larry Melear Harry Johnston, Esquire Mr. Carmen Annunziato Mr. Perry Cessna Mr. Ron Hoggard CITY of BOYNTON BEACH ~,' . Office ~ ~ of the City Manager 120 N.E. 2nd AVENUE P.O. BOX 310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33435-0310 (305) 734-8111 November 16, 1982 Alan J. Ciklin, P.A. Boose, Ciklin & Martens Law Offices Eigth Floor - The Concourse 2000 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Re: Melear P.U.D. Dear Mr. Ciklin: In further response to your letter of November 2, 1982 relative to Melear P.U.D., it appears to me that the issues currently before your client and the City are as follows: 1. Your client has entered into an Agreement to annex1his property into the cit y of Boynton Beach as zoned, and as is feasible. This Agreement was made in connection with a desire to receive water and sewer services from the city of Boynton Beach for the purpose of developing his property, and was made in recogni- tion of the fact that there had been previous provisions made relative to the fact that the subject property is within the City of Boynton Beach utility Service Area. 2. Because your client's property is within the City's utility Service Area, it is appropriate that utilities be provided by the City of Boynton Beach and it is further appropriate that the utilities be provided in accordance with reason- able conditions established by the city of Boynton Beach. Alan J. ciklin, P.A. November 16, 1982 Page 3 Re: Melear P.U.D. 8. I believe it is fair to suggest that annexation is currently possible and appropriate and that you should arrange to appear before the planning and Zoning Board for an informal discussion of appropriate development of densities for the subject parcel of property, because I am sure that it would be the position of the City Council that they would expect to receive recommendations from the Planning and Zoning Board prior to taking a position on the proper density for this piece of proper t y. Alan J. ciklin, P.A. November 16, 1982 Page 2 Re: Melear P.U.D. 3. It is recognized that it is appropriate for your client's property to become a part of the City of Boynton Beach in order to provide a reasonable basis for the provision of public services to your client's property. 4. In a schematic map form, you have provided a schedule entitled, "Melear P.U.D. adjacent density comparison", which shows some density comparisons related to the Melear property. Carmen Annunziato, City Planner, has prepared a similar map entitled, "Comparison of Gross Densities Melear properties", which shows further identification of densities in the area of the Melear property. Your analysis of densities is presented in the first paragraph of page two of your letter. Carmen Annunziato's analysis of densities show that the accumulative average of gross densities for the projects shown on his map is 5.62 units per acre. 5. It appears that the County Administrator's Staff will certify an appropriate density that is con- sistent with the City's willingness to provide utilities. 6. I believe it is appropriate to interpret the city's position on this matter as one that relates to the rpovision of utilities to a reasonable and supportable density pattern. 7. I believe it would be current City policy to indicate to the county that a letter confirming the availability of utilities from the city for this particular piece of land would be supplied only in connection with the completion of the terms of the Agreement that was signed on August 18, 1982which indicates that your client agreed to voluntarily annex to the city of Boynton Beach as soon as annexation is possible. p ;n cL.-1 11/16/82 Letter to Alan J. Ciklin to be reviewed by Carmen and Perry. ( )J/--L! Z- fA #*1~ ~,. .. ."",0"", ffice '.t~' ~~, of the City Manager 120 N.E. 2nd AVENUE P.O. BOX 310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33435-0310 (305)734-8111 CITY of BOYNTON BEACH November 17. 1982 Alan J. Ciklin, P.A. Boose, Ciklin & Martens Law Offices Eighth Floor - The Concourse 2000 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Re: Melear P.U.D. Dear Mr. Ciklin: In further response to your letter of November 2, 1982 relative to Melear P.U.D., it appears to me that the issues currently before your client and the City are as follows: 1. Your client has entered into a voluntary agreement to annex this property into the City of Boynton Beach as soon as it is feasible. This Agreement was made in connection with a desire to receive water services from the City of Boynton Beach for the purpose of developing this property and was made in recognition of the fact that the subject property is within the City of Boynton Beach Utility Service Area. 2. Because your client's property is within the City's Utility service Area, it is appropriate that utilities be provided by the City of Boynton Beach and it is further appropriate that the utilities be provided in accordance with reasonable conditions established by the City of Boynton Bea , ~ ('>>1~~! ~~:,- iifiif!- .-= Alan J. Ciklin, P.A. November 17, 1982 Page 2 Re: Melear P.U.D. 3. It is recognized that it is appropriate for your client's property to become a part of the City of Boynton Beach in order to provide a reasonable basis for the provision of public services to your client's property. 4. In a schematic map form, you have provided a schedule entitled, "Melear P.U.D. Adjacent Density Comparison", which shows some density comparisons related to the Melear property. Carmen Annunziato, city Planner, has prepared a similar map entitled, "Comparison of Gross Densities, Melear properties", which shows further identification of densities in the area of the Melear property. Your analysis of densities is presented in the first paragraph of page two of your letter. Carmen Annunziato's analysis of densities show that the accumulative average of gross densities for the projects shown on his map is 5.62 units per acre. 5. It appears that the County Administrator's Staff will certify an appropriate density that is con- sistent with the City's willingness to provide utilities. 6. I believe it is appropriate to interpret the city's position on this matter as one that relates to the provision of utilities to a reasonable and support- able density pattern. 7. I believe it would be current City policy to indicate to the county that a letter confirming the availability of utilities from the city for this particular piece of land would be supplied only in connection with the completion of the terms of the Agreement that was signed on August 18, 1982 which indicates that your client agreed to voluntarily annex to the city of Boynton Beach as soon as annexation is possible. CITY of BOYNTON BEACH ~.. . Offico vJJ of the City Manager 120 N.E. 2nd AVENUE P.O. BOX 310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33435-0310 (305)734--8111 November 17, 1982 Alan J. Ciklin, P.A. Boose, Ciklin & Martens Law Offices Eighth Floor - The Concourse 2000 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm BeachJ Florida 33409 Re: Melear P.U.D. Dear Mr. Ciklin: In further response to your letter of November 2, 1982 relative to Melear P.U.D." it appears to me that the issues currently before your client and the City are as follows: 1. Your client has entered into a voluntary agreement to annex this property into the City of Boynton Beach as soon as it is feasible. This Agreement was made in connection with a desire to receive water services from the City of Boynton Beach for the purpose of developing this property and was made in recognition of the fact that the subject property is within the city of Boynton Beach Utility service Area. 2. Because your client's property is within the City's Utility service Area. it is appropriate that utilities be provided by the city of Boynton Beach and it is further appropriate that the utilities be provided in accordance with reasonable conditions established by the City of Boynton Beach. . Alan J. Ciklin, P.A. November 11, 1982 Page 2 Re: Melear P.U.D. 3. It is recognized that it is appropriate for your client's property to become a part of the City of Boynton Beach in order to provide a reasonable basis for the provision of public services to your client's property. 4. In a schematic map form, you have provided a schedule entitled, "Melear P.U.D. Adjacent Density Comparison", which shows some density comparisons related to the Melear property. Carmen Annunziato, city Planner, has prepared a similar map entitled, "Comparison of Gross Densities, Melear properties", which shows further identification of densities in the area of the Melear property. Your analysis of densities is presented in" the first paragraph of page two of your letter. Carmen Annunziato's analysis of densities show that the accumulative average of gross densities for the projects shown on his map is 5.62 units per acre. 5. It appears that the County Administrator's Staff will certify an appropriate density that is con- sistent with the city's willingness to provide utilities. 6. I believe it is appropriate to interpret the city's position on this matter as one that relates to the provision of utilities to a reasonable and support- able density pattern. 7. I believe it would be current city policy to indicate to the county that a letter confirming the availability of utilities from the city for this particular piece of land would be supplied only in connection with the completion of the terms of the Agreement that was signed on August 18. 1982 which indicates that your client agreed to voluntarily annex to the City of Boynton Beach as soon as annexation is possible. Alan J. Ciklin, P.A. November 17, 1982 Page 3 Re: Melear P.U.D. 8. I believe it is fair to suggest that annexation is currently possible and appropriate and that you should arrange to appear before the Planning and Zoning Board for an informal discussion of appropriate development of densities for the subject parcel of property, because I am sure that it would be the position of the City Council that they would expect to receive recommendations from the planning and Zoning Board prior to taking a position on the proper density for this piece of property. If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please let me know. Sincerely, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH !~L JottY V:te~ L. Cheney city Manager PLC:mh Enclosures cc: Carmen Annunziato, City Planner Perry Cessna, Director of utilities Central Files GUMl-"AHI~UI\I Ur l:itiU~0 U t: I\J 01 I II -.., I MELEAR PROr-'ERTIES ___ _. _-----1 __ _ -----' ~~~-------- <: .:.-",,,&1 1 t .. - - .... c== p==: " fI " _C I , I' I ': f. ; " '- i :; , ~: " I B 9 _____u --- .---- ~, -- --- ( I, r r " , ; , I , ~, ~ {' ~f1~ I ~ .. " r- ! 8 ,--' S ,- '-ILJ;; ".' , ' ~,~TDff -- !, , ~iI!8 flta ~ ! ,,' lLc ;:'~'1]'j ~e-; I . ~ ,,~, "J ~ f- I -, :J;L-f:f ='1 _or , ~ .] -' ._., I. ),.,:: '- \ --,...-. ~ . ""'~ . t----c-~;ri , " " C , 1\ I Ii 1\ I ~.) ~ 6 " ~ ,'.- -, , . i t P I 0 " -. , -, . 1 I~ '-:..:...::.:r'-"-~--'-~-: 1. ......ll_O'...~.C;cov...UO '.QQ !.,',' c I ! i., .'~ -~ ~aQI"lIn 1. "'&4__1001'\11> I,U J. S"""l :o.>"Uh...uu '.05 .. S4J>dA.h<lS... 1.61 ,. c.:....,....t.o....UD B.lll .. hnoUl11 1.10 J. c.:..L.t.ooo"" LH .. ...yntont.o.....up L51 .. IiOlll.J.dO.eo....tryClull 1." UD ""'tQ""''' ...1..... "---=--:--- :f==-=-===, JI r -' -,I , I! ~ .~ I I~C-~I . U_____,j =~ ' ( i rT,~~"l f I ' .-~ I~~" I'{II C "-"';. "j ,_1-- ,___',-' -11 r,' ~',--r'-!I- i~ . I- I rJ 2 , t t , _M i I t . ! , ~ t , J ^ ~ [ _._u. . ,: ,'"- ~-. ~ i' --.. )i " I s " , , 1 r , , --:-=-~==-:::3..:.-..-=_~ l , - ~-~.. ..- A . - .. - I . vrr;". i "4) 5 ~ , , I i t " ; SE.: , , I ---- h___"-'-_........._ " I --, ...__..u.___ -, -' ------ ! "- ,- , I f, ! ~ - cA/l{.-t~ ~ -, g '\ ;r. lIJ '>/ .!)! ~ \J " ,Ii ~ ~ =======1 I I I I I I _______..J --;---,----, , , I ~-',', I \",' I I I ________ _J _~'(fyD.l!=' _-, , I . -'.. ' ". -" .- /j :/ '..'~-J~- .., n ') (" ('I pO r, " REPLY MESSAGE FROM r --, Carmen S. Annunziato City Planner Peter Cheney City Manager TO Nov.16,1982 DATE: - Melear Property SUBJECf: P'OLD + I concur with the statements listed in your letter to Alan Ciklin dated November 16, 1982. CSA:mpc 'f., , . CC: Perry Cessna SIGNED PLEASE REPLY, TO REPLY DATE: SIGNED FORM F269 Available from GRAYARC COo. INC.. New Hanford, Conn. 06057 THIS COpy FOR PERSON ADDRESSED . -------- ------....--- ---.- -.- -- -- . ----.--..,- ~-----'--"~._~---- . J r t'.:.. .....- ./ j REPL V MESSAGE FROM I -"1 Carmen S. Annunziato City Planner TO Peter Cheney City Manager SUBJECT: Melear _PEopeE:t:~~s/Del1~i_t::Y _~ j)A TE: N()V--"_~2.-!l9 82 ,.OLD.. Accompanying this memo you will find a comparison of your densities of projects adjacent or in the area of the Melear property. The cumulative average of gross densities for the projects shown is 5.62 units per acre. CSA:mpc Attach. "~"'''''=''_","'~ _........,,~,_""-_~_... _.__" _..~.=_~".",.,....--.__.,,,,~,,,___--=-,._.,_, ~ .....__..-..'_. _-.-._.,,___.___._.~____,_~_._' ~ _ .,~.._", ."''"'''''''c...,....' ,'-'_'" "'.- . ~._~>i:! PLEAS. REPl Y TO SlGNED~ yf .- REPLY SIGNED ~ --~---......,._~---- FORM F269 Avadable from GRAYARC CO., INC.. New Hartford. Conn 06057 THIS COpy FOR PERSON ADDRESSED MEMORANDL . . TO Peter Cheney City Manager DAU November 10, 1982 !". .J! FILE FROM Carmen S." Annunziato City Planner 5U8JECT Ciklin Letter/Melear Property This memorandum is in response to your request for comment concerning Mr. Ciklin's letter of November 2,1982 and specifically the discussion which occurred at a meeting held in the County Zoning Director's office on October 27,1982. The parties present at the October 27th meeting were Mr.Ciklin, Mr. Hoggard of Gee and Jensen, Mr. Melear, Mr. Morley of the County Planning Office, Mr. Lunney, the County Zoning Director, Perry Cessna and me. The discussions held at the meeting centered on Mr. Ciklin's inability to secure a letter confirming the avail- ability of utilities from the City. The reasons put forth in this regard were Boynton Beach's immediate desire to process the development applications and an unwillingness to enter into a development approval process without a prior understand- ing of an acceptable level of density. Mr. Ciklin reduced the scope of discussion to two principle concerns, one being attempting to secure the utility letter without the benefit of immediate annexation and the other being an attempt to secure from the City an understanding of what level of density the City would offer in return for annexation. With respect to the former, Mr. Ciklin was advised that he could always request the City Council to authorize a utility letter if the administrative staff was unwilling to do so and, with respect to the latter, Mr. Ciklin was advised to send a letter to the City Manager requesting an answer concerning dens,i ty. Beyond this, nothing else was decided; however, the County advised Mr. Ciklin that they would only certify for public hearing purposes, the density which the City would be willing to serve utility wise. The additional information requested will follow in short order. CSA:mpc . GA~~'~_< (r ~u::::t. Carmen S: Annunzi 0 City Planner CC: Utility Director Central File ?h"'d-. CITY of BOYNTON BEACH ~ ..,. . ~ ~ 120N.E. 2nd AVENUE P.O. BOX 310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33435-0310 (305) 734-8111 November 8, 1982 Alan Ciklin Boose Ciklin & Martens Law Offices 2000 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West palm Beach, Florida 33409 HcJ::,~ (ltt"C'"J OatL--JLfJ / r------=__ Time 'II! V s- Re: Melear P.U.D. Dear Alan: I have reviewed your letter of November 2, 1982, and have asked Carmen Annunziato to provide me with a report on the October 27, 1982, meeting. In addition, I have asked Carmen to provide me with a map that shows the densities for all of the property adjacent to the Melear tract including that property on the east side of Congress Avenue, which was left off of your sketch. After I have received this information from Carmen, I will be in touch with you with a further response to your letter. 'Sincerely, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH ~/~,: &:? c~4 Peter Lo Cheney City Manager PLC : j C cc: carmen Annunziato central File Mayor and City Council ~,M~ MEMORANDUM November 8, 1982 TO: carmen Annunziato City planner RE: Alan Ciklin's Letter of November 2, 1982 Melear P.U.D. please review the attached letter and provide me with J 4.. ".- . p written report concerning the discussion that took place at ")'0 the meeting on October 27th relative to densities. would you also review the attachment to Alan ciklin's j letter and provide me with a similar attachment that addresses ",-~",,-.......J densities of development on all land adjacent and in the area I ,It< of the Melear tract including the east side of congress Ave. /) (l(L d~4 Peter L. Cheney city Manager PLC : j c Attachment cc: Central File Rec Date -- Time _ ./~ iac:x:a: ClllKUn & mARrEn~S LAW OFFICES ':;1 , :~ ;', , 1,:,) WILLIAM R. BOOSE. III ALAN J, CIKLlN, PA. ANNI W, COLLETTE STEPHEN FRY RICHARD L. MARTENS, P.A, KERRY R, SCHWENCKE 2 November 1982 . NOV 1982 . '~..~r;~::*,~ . ,~:o' ~ ..''''":\ ::~~,'? /;t{-:~'~~.~~ Mr. Peter Cheney City Manager City of Boynton Beach Post Office Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33435 Re: Melear P.U.D. Dear Peter: On Wednesday, October 27, 1982, Carmen Annunziato and the County Planning & Zoning representatives met with Larry Melear, Ron Hoggard of Gee & Jensen and myself to discuss a method of resolving the apparent log-jam with the Melear P.U.D. The problem, from our standpoint, arises due to the fact that Palm Beach County has a Comprehensive Plan designation for this property in the 8 to 12 unit per acre category with up to 16 units per acre with a transfer of development rights. The City does not have a Comprehensive Plan recommendation for the site and apparently is using the County's previous Comprehensive Plan designation of 3 to 5 units per acre. We have, of course, agreed to annex into Boynton Beach in exchange for water and sewer service and continue to stand by that commitment. However, the City desires us to go through all governmental approvals in Boynton Beach rather than proceed through governmental approvals in Palm Beach County and then annex. The comprehensive planning progress, as we see it, provides guidelines to City and County Commissions for future development as well as providing property oWners a guideline as to what they can expect to be approved for their property. In the case of the Melear P.U.D., we have that guideline in the unincorporated area, but do not have such a guideline in the incorporated area of Boynton Beach. . Based on the foregoing quandary, Carmen suggested that I request to have the Melear P.U.D. brought before either the Boynton Planning Commission and/or Boynton City Commission to discuss, probably in a workshop session, what they envision to be a reasonable density for the Melear P.U.D. By doing this, we will have a better picture of what to expect should we elect to go to the City of Boynton for our governmental approvals and the workshop review of the site will give us the same benefit most developers have, that is, a Comprehensive Plan rec~nmendation for future development~ L EIGHTH FLOOR, THE ConcOURSE' 2000 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA, 33409 ' I30SI 689, 9595 T~ 510'952'7646 - I I I I \ I . I I I 3.6 DUlAC I L_- L-- __....1--- _ ---3-- - MINER.:BQ_-...--- - ----"1 ( I I I I KNOLLWOOD I 3.5 DUlAC I \ I 9.3 DUlAC L _ I'. I -1 \,\9.0 DUlAC \ 9.3 DUlAC J w I 'l > I l-----~ I MELEAR ~.U.D. ~- : _------4 I 9\~U/AC OV~~::/--1 en 15.5 DUlAC I \. .. ~ / IW I I "-..'--_____, a: I \ --r ~ J I .0 1------1 I 9.5 DUlAC I 18.4 DUlAC 10 I I I I . MEADOWS 300 P.U.D. \ \ 7.7' I 4.7 DUlAC \ DUlAC t I, :: 7 DU/:C I 7.0 DUlAC . (MOBILE HOMES) I SAND AND SEA , I (MOBILE HOMES) I I I ~- -~-E - N.W. 22 NO. AV . -- CONGRESS LAKES I I I . . _J , . -.--J MELEAR P.U.D. ADJACENT DENSITY COMPARISON s: .. .. o <: 1" = 600' (J?l,e / *~ :> r:ove.r~Lp J; 1 ('''';:':2 ~,,1r. Pe-tel: C1-:CDf1V C1.. t'\J r:'an?;q0r ri t ~/ ,"')f ?oynt.0n ft~;'H~~ f"CF.t OffiJ~€ lI"(')y ~1f: !?o'l\,mt~n t',el\~1:, 1"1, :3:~4.1~: Rn: "/("1f1:'&\!' 'f.\.lj..f". r'e(~r f'~t ~r t :,"r, 'i",~~d~~$dav, 0cto't'~r '-7. ].('102, C?'trrnen p.."nnr:n~,,:i.~t.n cn(1 tht'!- ('.ounty rl~nl1inc ~ Zonina r(:1r:rp9Hntatlv~s me-t "':i.th L~rr"V r.i~lp;a,Y, non l-:Qorl"l\.rr'J cf ;;~t? (.. .:ren$~n. arH~ nye&lf to ~'i..scup.;g. -?, 'v"+:h~'''(~ {,', r~e~;.lvin('J' tht"": (l~'np',rpnt lor"-i~rr( ';:dt'h t.}He ,:,1ele:ar p.r'. f). :r"'l>]~ "'ro'\.-lc;p,~ror;,: nnr 5tanr1rotnt.. arifie$ !.~lU!! to t.11e .fi;lCt t:--iat pfiJr, p(I"~,C'l', ("(,\l1!"it? ..),S~ ~ CCH~rreri?n~d.""'~ 'Pl~~ ~~~~lqn1!:,t-ir:'r1 :for t"b.i.s ::---r~':"";(,lrtv.lr tl':e:: i:o I? nt:it l''.':'r acre cat~('!('!r~1 Nit1.., un t.O It; Dnits Pf'r acrl?~'Jit~ ~ t~rnnsff..'c'r of f!pvel(':.'r.~.,nt ri,('!'ht_D. "rhf~ f"it.'/ (~Cte""'~~ 7'}C't l~(.,'V.o ~ r0~rrr€''te;''1$1'O'J~ rl~,tl :r~r."..,mr:ie:r1'1Piti()'r1 ~rt'()r t"l'p t1:itc tn""l 7~r"n"",r~~tl V ; -'. n~f.!"ir.7 t,1-;(? r("'n~ntv' ~ pr€vi.ov~ ("(')n_r-r"~~',~:'-n$jvp. TIHr-, f~~$iN:r:"iti{')t" 0f ?, '-_n 17; ti:nitp: ;'H~r ,'$IoC!"'i-"<t. ~,ff!l hnv~, r, I':" C(H~r.".I:i{~, {h.~r-r'-ed t~~ .,,\PTte'( IT':t.0 f'l.()vntnr, Pt:*~("l"' fr, e""eh~);r-y,,? :~r t,.TBtp_'r" ~r;t" f'{/?-t..'f~r ,,~PT'vlcp ~nt~t contjr!:1~.p, to ,S?',tanr1 t.~1at C"c'r'''r~'it,r''~nt. ..ji':I.....t::"':v~r, t_l',<?J' rit:."/ d~r~~.r("s t1'P to r:C" tt'ir()t~f11~ p:ll (;()"7~~rf1..ri("nt,~} ;,~t-,""'::r{')'\r;r~l r-: In r'()\"'!1t.on rl:~:~c1-,; re,t.':c): t."h?1n t'ro(:~e~("O: t_'i1r("-!}:~1<" "',;(y\-"-pr""--I."':1'-;tt"!1 ,,,,'c"nrc,v<-;l!'!: -in T)a.J\., ';'Pi"C"'; '---(HJnt'r err' t'hP!:i Dr;nf";X. ':Y:I';~ c(>";r'-r~,":lh,(?nsivr.< .2:.nr;i.r'j(~ rt"'oc;"r0:~r~, r~ \'It'i> r,(.~!i.:: it, r'rc,vidc~ ,~n i ,~''?''l J IV':.... tD ('; t-:~' ""r:.t:@ C()ur~tv r~;-,;!>-j, ?;.;:;;j,r:-:n!7' -t:or C1..'3t ~}rf; t'~f"'Yol():r"ti?nt ;rH:; \''';'-:-11 ,,":.":1, 'i",rov,;_,"1n"'^' r:!"(.Jr~~'rt:y (J\r::,;"T'!l., ~ ;;',n:i~r.'1.hH'~ 'H', tc \fft'iS,t t'Ht'"",. .;'~qn /T'x,'.ect tc ~"'(' ,n;r-':~r()..;!(''''-<: ~(>r' 't~',~,j!, ""-'r0',;';c!"'t:,~. 1::-;: tl-1? C,~Be of ti1~ ~'01er";j n.,!. ., '.<;e- ""~VP th.~.t. Gui::~p:1 iriP i:'1 t~'\f' Hn:!nc.',~r.p()Tat(',!"l ~;X;~-'.J., h"t. i,~_D ;;-:"';.1: 'j it'r~";\ ~b(';"' ,. f:~'tdd('l1 irJ:' :in t).~:'!'lir>("'(:,r"'(~"rnt~i1 ?_r~E':. (' f. \:~("'Y-r; L~n f'E'-.-).C'; ;'~? ~p-t; ()r: t -S'e r'-:-'rc-::I,..~.n': "ualj..-1 f::J,"V, r.::1r~"1f':'ri !;'U;>':,;('!.~tl?:~l t.ha t. 1 rr:'''ftH:~:Q:t f:{,! :~l'Vf' tJ"C'. :"-;f,~lc?r I":'.~f.r. rrnuc!l"t l~~(_'fcr(~ ,:::'ftl~er t1;:of) r-'r:vnt01i -r'J7-!!lH"'l],n.-: ::'on:f'~is.~i{jn en~~/("r POV-nt.f)Yi ~it..:.".r ():H -:,~l~1;.i0n t,o "-;1 }";Ct1S:--::, ~-'r(')l.~::-,lv :in ..n ',.-;'or"~51',or' BF'f:",j,.:::,n, .......hG.t t'h:)v 4?:r:vl~~jon t<:' ~',c ti r t~i:; 9C'YlP:l-', l t:' .1r.p ~~" tv ,ror t:;-;r<: ~.;,;:.) 1,:;:.;:'\.r '7", i'.. 1".. '....'] r:; it'::::" f;"hi p, ';"'fl>'. .,,;;11 r"i"';VO~ ;t: -;",:'ttf'r ~~';'Ct.l.H.l'" cf ~"h;..'" to t?':Yn~('t. s)".,;p}:i >-'€) (,'lect b:) ,.~(' tn t},-;,: .-,.~t~,~ ,O)J;' I"'c,':~"-)"'~_.,,: .(.'01:- ':""u'x ,.er:v~r':"'r'{-H't''i.J ?j""'r"L.t......,.r21 q .t'j 't1 ("1 t::'.::~ ~.,";rv~......,~~.... s.r"_1'j0'c., r:'" -t:~..~~ :"":!tF- "i,.d.l] i,iv"'" 1Jf'; t'\.", ~n1"'?' ~-';i,l1E+-it .~(.~~t. '1J1',U-f~1: n-:C",;."'r :-~, ~-'VL', ~.1.;~t, ;';;:', ,.. (''''')~'''r'''!,~~..'r't'';'l~.~:i'\,N'' ~l,~~!~; ~~'),C'I,');'''''':''''!'?r...,!:'~rti(';n 7C:ir f'l't_lJr~' ~C"!"'l,"'j: "'i:'>1~t.. t.';r. r.~t~r ("T.Ch'i":'V ? :':"over~~':',~)t" 1 !"~:::' ;13..":1(' '1'\'.'0 I ~'R".rG" t.al~~n t)-.~ 1 f~c:rtv of ~l""clo~ic.~f 3r H('~j~cent i1~l"Js:it../ (~('H\1i.~E*:rit1Qn rr~f'f:\rpc:~by' ~Jr. ~:";rJ(F'H~rf'.. 'There-n.s! tt~1:;; ft~("')'.m en'" t:.h~ 1i,"ctr.~"' "r~ not n""ce~""'rilv o"''1:rnl1 ,l...n~i ti~" of "rl <!<ntir<'!> ~r("'>1"'!'ct, :_~ut, !:xe ~~ffectiv~ n~t. dff'!H~:ftJ(-~~ o-f: t,,!..,(-;,, Z'q.....r:-.t.(">~.iy.~tt'~ l~.cr.tlGf'l' l'th'",,,;"r'I. !.~or .t:"4IltC\.l""T'.l,.." C'c,r':f"'Irt"':'J<.'t l.al!2'F "1~. ~ ~n (l'v'(";rr,ll !J('~n~it.'t/ ':)r 11.' l.:H1:ltF~'~r c.C"rc y,t1:+_ ,,{'1jaelt~p.t. t;to, t'--:e t';,e-l"'!a:r nr('~r',(')rtv t!'"-4" e-.ctnA:l (~~~r:~lt_'v i p , 1":.7 ~'Jr.~,t~ i;:f'r :"!tcre. corvrr!J;{' 1":', t}--~,'8 T';~.lf."::i.r l'.~'.!i.. };("\'j. l'ln C"'Jrr?11 A(t'n:e-it:.',/ ,...,.. .') l.'lt'''f{t,s !.+~r l'C!""1'!' \...oit1. ;'0 effe:ct_i\l'f) ~'1~n~itv \:'o~t"'der;.n(')' Cl')n"~refi"~ 1,",\Jo:~~ (~~ 1 p. A ~!"l~1 :-1e-pf:itv ~"'Ic,;'\r.4eri~~ ~J-1'1nllt0'c-~~"'r~, of 3.tt. Ir ~1ey..tn~lr~"f' t:~'!p 'p;tt<:€("t';, tJ:~ int.~lIr'f~cin1'! ~~,:,1 c~''Pat,ihi' 1t~...!, "",.I::. .4(:\"1!;f t,i.~t:l: ~,'?'t9' ~'r \iri"'\lIi'!r~/ ~t"')rj4,":'~r'i'~ ?1~r1 \.....{~ t"~1 j (?VP ~,~;) ~'(l";VC .t;,ccn!';;~~l i ~1'e'-"! t:}-,~ t . Tr- ~..en.\. t: i 01" I tl,Al'f.' :'Ire',! -f-'ActJ'::"rs f;\,;t;;~i a~ t"'1':~ r>'J)l:1:.Et€'rlCt' (".f: f:ru1nv 2:.....,llt~1~ F:H;,....,d."'f~s f"t,,; t1.,t~ ;o"~r~ f~r:(' ~'ei!1" ~...,,~td_l.p ~~"""f'- t"'~r"'lf1 rq,,.,tl~ ,.."fw~:ll":1-','hav~'; v~r'/ i~tf'nf~~' -if"'velt:""r'r~~r,i:.r, ,.,,.It.''O\H'~r tl'7.:'1.r ,'~pn$,i.,t'.!' .trr r~lati,=:!~l'.~ le....... Pl @>1'\i7,('> ("cnf~:Ll~r t}-j s- nut' l~t;};;":tle$.t t(", f"BVl' th+?' x;~~.".tt€;r c:~ t't-.$.;' v,~l~(\r -:;'.r:. f.'-. hr(tl):t1'I~t. l',€:,-fc-r~ th(1'- ~t"'r;r"'r'ri.€"t.e!:""e{.:i~e t.o ('7tfJ,f':VqE1: t?~f." rp.co!'('!,~erH'l~.1 denti5:tty if' t.1~,f:': City 0F T":nynt.cn t"f.'i.t\':'''-.. ~,~"(', c,r- ("'()\~rff1?, uenl"'! li"'l? to ~"~' ~':ref'Jr~nt. \',':}~.r:rn t~l'd,f1: nBttr>>!" ~.~. ';;i!!-1lCllC,~C;'.;\ 1$0 tl,:(:\t ",.j4~ r'~a.y n-l'c;-vi(~".." 1,>Jl"el,t '",'"r:: lc'f'l i~v~ is "'!~ll,'lahl4'f.) lnrl..d:-.. "~,B P':l":la""~~, t1'~n1:~ :-/(.u fc,t" 'VGnT ......~.r::r~.:rn+:;..~T\ il':; trts rroi1",tt_~r.. I st-,;"lll a\..,.r~Jt, ~,"-r;;Hr rp-;:"lv. ::~i nc~r~ly, ;~l~HT ,J. r!l'l.in ~,1C /} ..r, ~(':t ~"~r. !,;:tr't"\)" ?'!.elp.~,r Pt':t"ry ,Jo'h"stcn, r-~...,ujrp; ~'!r. ?o~ t,~ory,.".~r'l ~!r. Car-rt0n An.nU'07iato ~Jr. r'f!'rry r:~ ftSD1'\ '~r. ~;h"7:'"r;;t,11Y Lur.r>i"Y " t 'fI MEMORANDL'A DATI[ Sept. 29, 1982 TO Peter Cheney City Manager FILE "'''OM Carmen S. Annunziato City Planner 5UIIIJI!CT Development/Melear Tract On Tuesday, September 28, 1982, I met with Tim Lunny, Zoning Director and Richard Morley, Principal Planner for Palm Beach county concerning the Melear tract. Specifically, we discussed the po- tential for development of this tract and the associated density. The Melear tract is designated Medium-Medium High in the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan which correlates with a base density of 8 units per acre. Up to 4 units per acre density bonus may be awarded for developing a Planned Unit Development and an additional 4 units per acre may be transferred to this property from reserved property. This, of course, provides for a range of densities of from 8 to 16 units per acre which may be awarded subject to compliance with the Comprehensive Plan performance standards. Based on these preliminary discussions with the County staff, it is apparent that the owners of the Melear tract would likely receive approval from the Board of County Commissioners for a Planned Unit Development with a density of 9 1 ~its per acre if they can meet the performance standards. Owing to the fact that Congress Avenue is to be reconstructed northward from NW 22nd Avenue to Hypoluxo Road, the critical factor for density becomes availability of sewers and water facilities. Sewer and water facilities may, in fact become the only limiting factor as the County staff would like- ly certify an application for rezoning in the unincorporated county at whatever density the City is willing to serve within the limits of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Classification. I will continue to advise as more information become available. c:::::~ Sf ~..r.:- Carmen S. Annunz'ato City Planner CSA:mpc CC: Perry Cessna Central File