Loading...
CORRESPONDENCE CITY of BOYNTON BEACH G!),.. Office '.t~" ~. of the City Manager 120 N.E. 2nd AVENUE P.O. BOX 310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33435-0310 (305) 734-8111 November 17, 1982 Alan J. Ciklin, P.A. Boose, Ciklin & Martens Law Offices Eighth Floor - The Concourse 2000 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Re: Melear P.U.D. Dear Mr. Ciklin: In further response to your letter of November 2, 1982 relative to Melear P.U.D., it appears to me that the issues currently before your client and the City are as follows: 1. Your client has entered into a voluntary agreement to annex this property into the City of Boynton Beach as soon as it is feasible. This Agreement was made in connection with a desire to receive water services from the City of Boynton Beach for the purpose of developing this property and was made in recognition of the fact that the subject property is within the City of Boynton Beach Utility Service Area. 2. Because your client's property is within the City's Utility Service Area, it is appropriate that utilities be provided by the city of Boynton Beach and it is further appropriate that the utilities be provided in accordance with reasonable conditions established by the city of Boynton Beach. ... .."",. , . Alan J. Ciklin, P.A. November 11, 1982 Page 2 Re: Melear P.U.D. 3. It is recognized that it is appropriate for your client's property to become a part of the City of Boynton Beach in order to provide a reasonable basis for the provision of public services to your client's property. 4. In a schematic map form, you have provided a schedule entitled. "Melear P.U.D. Adjacent Density Comparison", which shows some density comparisons related to the Melear property. Carmen Annunziato, city Planner, has prepared a similar map entitled, "Comparison of Gross Densities, Melear properties", which shows further identification of densities in the area of the Melear property. Your analysis of densities is presented in the first paragraph of page two of your letter. Carmen Annunziato's analysis of densities show that the accumulative average of gross densities for the projects shown on his map is 5.62 units per acre. 5. It appears that the County Administrator's Staff will certify an appropriate density that is con- sistent with the City's willingness to provide utilities. 6. I believe it is appropriate to interpret the City's position on this matter as one that relates to the provision of utilities to a reasonable and support- able density pattern. 7. I believe it would be current City policy to indicate to the county that a letter confirming the availability of utilities from the City for this particular piece of land would be supplied only in connection with the completion of the terms of the Agreement that was signed on August 18, 1982 which indicates that your client agreed to voluntarily annex to the City of Boynton Beach as soon as annexation is possible. west of Congress Avenue is now under construction - being widened to 4-lanes. Lantana Road between Congress Avenue and 1-95 is a 2-lane facility. The Comprehensive Plan proposed widening of this section to 4 lanes. - riaa::a: ClllKUn &. mARTEns LAW OFFICES WILLIAM R. BOOSE, III ALAN J. CIKLlN, P.A, ANNI W. COLLETTE STEPHEN FRY RICHARD L. MARTENS. P.A. KERRY R. SCHWENCKE Mr. Peter L. Cheney City Manager City of Boynton Beach 120 N.E. 2nd Avenue Post Office Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33435 I /:'~,'~ /~'l.1'J..\.J l.. . "';' . '(') [:::. .:-: ; '\, ..-~ i!} \\U~ 1~~2 'i"-"' Jr"' : ~ :-~"'::(':f-~\ !:: \:;. : "....~.~., ...:'-;.. \ ' " f~,~,'J t\, ~;_~I.f..,. \1:-\ ,,..,..~ 'Off,ir:F \ ,.., ~ \-;~. "~>I /~/ l' ,~! (?f r;' ,., 23 November 1982 Re: Melear P.U.D. Dear Peter: Thank you for your letter of November 17,1982. We are ready to appear before the Planning and Zoning Board for an informal discussion of the appropriate development of densities for the subject parcel of property. At your earliest convenience, please schedule me for such an appearance so that we make make a presentation to them in an informal setting and to discuss the relative merits of the the Melear proposal and densities. Regarding the other issues as you see them, I offer the following comments: 1. My client has entered into a voluntary agreement to annex the property into the City of Boynton and is ready, willing and able to comply with the terms of that agreement. We certainly agree that the City of Boynton Beach is the appropriate means of supply as it relates to utilities. The only question that continues to arise, is that there is nothing included in the agreement that requires the Melears to proceed through governmental approvals in the City. However, we may not have a problem with proceeding in the City for governmental approval once we have a feel for what the Planning and Zoning Board determines to be an appropriate density for the site. 2. I have reviewed Carmen Annunziato's comparison of gross density and have no argument with it but for the caveat that the densities reflect over-all project densities and not necessarily effective densities immediately adjacent EIGHTH F~' TIi€ concOURSE, 2000 PAlM BEACH lAKES BlVD. WEST PALM BEACH, FLOHillA ' 33409 ' 1305: 68\>' 9595 TU~ 510.952- 764~ Mr. Carmen S. Annunziato City Planner 120 N.E. 2nd Avenue P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 County Administrator John C. Sansbury epartment of Planning, Zoning, & Building Robert E. Basehart Director Board of County Commissioners Peggy B. Evatt, Chairman Ken Spillias, Vice Chairman Dennis P. Koehler Dorothy Wilken Bill Bailev August 23, 1983 if,- Dear Carmen: As you requested, I have reviewed the proposed annexation called Melear Planned Unit Development. The Planning Division's analysis indicates the subject property (154.6 acres) is presentl y zoned AR (Agr icul tural Res idential) allowing for one unit per five acres. The County's Comprehensive Plan designates the area as Medium to Medium High having a potential density range of eight units per acre in a standard subdivision and twelve units per acre in a Planned Unit Development. However, the allowable density is determined by the project's ability to meet the following five mandatory performance standards: Water Services, Sewer Services, Major Thoroughfares, Environmental Impacts, and Market Analysis. It is assumed that water and sewer services will be provided by the City of Boynton Beach. There appears to be no environmental impact from the proposed project and according to County Standards, a market analysis is not required for a commercial area within a PUD as long as there is no direct access off Congress Avenue. The Traffic Performance Standard appears to be the major problem area of the proposed annexation. The Traffic Impact Analysis identified over 10,000 trips per day generated from 1,005 units, causing major roadway links to be impacted within a five mile radius of the project. It is my understanding Charles Walker, Director of the Traffic Division, has been requested to review and comment on the potential impact of the subject development on County roadway systems and consistency with adopted Comprehensive Plan policies and objectives. His comments along with the Planning Division review will ultimately determine Plan consistency with regard to the Traffic Performance Standard. 3400 BELVEDERE ROAD. WEST PALM BEACH, FWRIDA 33406 . (305) 471-3520 /l7~ MEMORANDUM November 30, 1982 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Re: Melear P.U.D. The last piece of land to be reviewed for development on the west side of Congress Avenue, north of Old Boynton Road, is the Melear Tract. As you know, the owner of this tract executed an agreement for water service outside the City Limits (see attached). with this agreement, they agreed ..."in consideration of the privilege of receiving water service from said CITY, that the execution of this Agreement is considered a voluntary Petition for annexation." For your information, I have attached correspondence and memorandum relative to the Melear P.U.D. approval process, which I am forward- ing to you. I don't feel that the matter should be coming before the city Council for consideration until after it has been reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Board and appropriate Staff and Planning & Zoning Board recommendations have been prepared for City Council consideration. You can see from the attached correspondence and a memo to Carmen Annunziato that it is being suggested that this matter be placed on the next Planning & Zoning Board Agenda for consideration by that Body, if the Chairman of the planning & Zoning Board agrees to including it on the Agenda. (~t_) oiv/ U~ei>~. Cheney City Manager PLC :mh cc: City Planner Central Files ~\;t~'~ ~ ' -C~/ Tjme__~~~___ Atts. MEMORANDUM November 30, 1982 To: Carmen Annunziato, City Planner Re: Melear P.U.D. You have received a copy of a letter from Alan Ciklin dated November 23, 1982. Please arrange to prepare a Planning Staff recommendation on this matter and place the issue on the next Planning & Zoning Board Agenda if the Chairman of the Board so approves. It seems to me that this is the best way to get a policy determination on the possible density of the develop- ment of the Melear P.U.D. rP:l-o - Ie-- ~tel:' L. 'Ch~Y City Manager PLC:mh Att. cc: City Attorney Central Files ,~ ,_ ~Jl MEMORANDUM TO: Peter L. Cheney, City Manager FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato, City Planner DATE: 27 July 1983 RE: MELEAR PROPERTY Accompanying this memo you will find a copy of a request for Annexation,Land Use Element Amendment and Rezoning submitted by Allen Ciklin, Esq. for the Melear family. Consistent with previously established procedure, the City Council must first determine whether or not they wish to proceed with annexation. If the Council so determines, these items should be forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Board for pUblic hearings. (..,...~J~ Carmen S. Ann ziato City Planner /bks Attachments MEMORANDUM TO: Finance Department FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato, City Planner DATE: 28 July 1983 RE: Filing Fees Attached are two checks to be deposited in connection with the referenced subject. The first check is in the amount of $650.00 from Boose, Ciklin & Martens Law Offices. It should be deposited as follows: Rezoning - Account Annexation-Account Master Plan-Acct. No. No. No. 001-000-341-31-00 001-000-341-33-00 001-000-341-32-00 $300.00 300.00 50.00 The second check from Peabody and Childs Architects, Inc. is a site plan application fee to be deposited in account no. 001-000-341-36-00. This check is in the amount of $200.00. Thank you. c.~JC ~ Carmen S. Ann ziato City Planner /bks Attachments cc: Central File MEMORANDUM August 9, 1983 TO: All Department Heads FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato City Planner RE: MELEAR ANNEXATION Alan Ciklin, agent for the Melear family has requested annexation of a 154.6 acre tract of land located west of the Dos Lagos de- velopment (see attachments). Consistent with current policy, please complete the form which accompanies this memo and return it to me by August 26th, for inclusion in the proceedings of the Planning and Zoning Board public hearing. Thank you. a ~L-~_.::t Carmen S. nunziato City Planner /bks Attachments cc: City Manager Page Two Carmen Annunziato August 23, 1983 In summary, the proposed overall gross density of 6.5 units per acre in the Melear PUD is substantially below the density range of 8 to 12 (PUD) units per acre in the County's Medium to Medium High Land Use Designation of the Comprehensive Plan for the subject site. However, the actual allowable density of the project will be predicated upon the project's ability to satisfy the County's Traffic Performance Standard as defined by Ordinance 81-6. Depending upon the results of the County Traffic Engineers' Analysis and the Planning Division's determination, the density could conceivably be much less than what the County Comprehensive Plan designates for the area unless major road improvement are made to offset road impacts. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to write or call. Sincerely, ~~~~:I principal Planner RFM:cb cc: Charles Walker, Traffic Engineering Stan Redick, Planning Director @ 120 N.E. 2nd AVENUE P.O. BOX 310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33435-0310 (305) 734-8111 CITY of BOYNTON BEACH 29 August 1983 Mr. Robert Basehart Executive Director Palm Beach County Planning and Zoning Department 3400 Belvedere Road West Palm Beach, FL 33406 Dear Bob: The purpose of this letter is to further advise you of matters related to the Melear annexation which is currently being pro- cessed by the City of Boynton Beach. At the time that I requested comments from members of your staff, I failed to notify them that as a part of the annexation advertise- ment, the City of Boynton Beach is also advertising for the annexa- tion of Old Boynton Road, east of Javert/Knuth Road. This roadway annexation is being advertised for annexation in a manner similar to the fee simple land holding. If you have any questions/comments concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Yours very truly, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH c~ Carmen S. Annunziato City Planner /bks cc: Mr. H. F. Kehlert, County Engineer Mr. Charles Walker Mr. Stan Reddick Mr. Peter L. Cheney, City Manager Central File MEMORANDUM 6 September 1983 TO: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato, City Planner RE: APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT AND REZONING/ALAN CIKLIN, ESQUIRE FOR CARILLA, LARRY AND MICHAEL MELEAR INTRODUCTION Alan Ciklin is proposing to annex into Boynton Beach a 154.56 acre tract of land located on North Congress Avenue, west side, between Lake Worth Drainage District Canals No. 20 and 21 (See Exhibit 'A') This property is currently zoned AG (Agriculture) and is undeveloped. Also, accompanying this request is a legal description prepared by the City Staff which provides for the annexation of Old Boynton Road east of Knuth Road. In connection with this request for annexation, the applicant is pro- posing that the land be zoned Planned Unit Development with a Land Use Intensity = 4.00 (PUD w/LUI = 4). This PUD provides for the construction of 1005 units of which 83 are proposed to be single family detached with the remaining 922 units to be quadraplexes (289), townhouses (331), and condominiums (302). The gross density proposed is 6.5 units per acre. Also proposed within the PUD is a 3.1 acre commercial tract. Additional major uses of land are 7.6 acres for Miner Road, 5.8 acres for the interior collector road, 15.1 acres for lakes and 4.1 acres for buffers. Procedure These applications for annexation, amendment to the future land use element of the Comprehensive Plan and rezoning are being processed consistent with state statutes, and Boynton Beach Codes, ordinances and resolutions as follows: 1. F.S. 163.3161: Local Government Comprehensive Planning Act; 2. F.S. 166.041: Procedures for Adoption of Ordinances and Resolutions; 3. F.S. 171.011: Municipal Annexation and Contraction Act; 4. Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, Appendix A, Section 3A5(e): Boundary and Zoning; 5. Boynton Beach Ordinance #79-24: 6. Boynton Beach Resolution #76-X: Procedures for Annexation. These procedures have been tabulated for informational purposes and for ease of processing as noted in the attached annexation timetable (See Exhibit 'B'). Paraphrasing the timetable, these requests re- quire review by the City Department Heads, newspaper advertisements, public hearings with the Planning and Zoning Board and the City Council and Council adoption of ordinances to annex, amend the future land use element and rezone. Also included is a consistency review by the Board of County Commissioners. These procedures take approxi- mately three months to complete. Current Land Use and Zoning The property which is the subject of this annexation is currently undeveloped and it is zoned AG (Agriculture) in Palm Beach County. The land use and zoning of the surrounding land varies and is presented for your information in the table which follows: Direction Jurisdiction Zoning Land Use north Boynton Beach PUD Residential (under development) east Boynton Beach PUD Residential (under development) south Boynton Beach PUD Residential (proposed) sou th Palm Beach County RS/SE Residential (manufactured homes) west Palm Beach County RS/SE Residential (manufactured homes) west Palm Beach County PUD Residential (proposed) -2- FUTURE LAND USE AND ZONING Congress Avenue has and will continue to be an area of intensive development in the Boynton Beach area. The reasons for this are many and include the availability of sewer and water utilities, increases in roadway capacity, the existence of large tracts of land suitable for planned development and the growth-pole nature of the Boynton Beach Mall and the Motorola paging products division plant, characteristically, the intensity of development on Congress Avenue peaks between Boynton Beach Boulevard and N. 22nd Avenue and then declines both northward and southward with Hunter's Run Golf and Racquet Club and the Meadows 300 and Boynton Lakes PUD's forming low-density anchors south and north respectively. The Melear tract lies to the north of this intensive concentration of land uses and forms the bridge between a high density residential PUD to the south and low density PUD's to the north and northeast; therefore, the proposed Moderate Density residential land use category is appropriate for this location. A Planned Unit Development with a Land Use Intensity of 4.0 is consistent with the proposed Moderate Density land use category and with the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan future land use category, subject to meeting the performance criteria for developments of this type. Concerning the tract of land proposed for commercial uses, the number of acres proposed is appropriate for a development of this size, how- ever, the location proposed appears to violate the letter and intent of the PUD zoning regulations. There are three qualifications sug- gested in the Comprehensive Standards section of the PUD regulations as follows: 1. the land proposed for commercial use should serve the needs of the PUD, and not the general needs of the surrounding area; 2. the commercial tract shall be located so as to not front on a perimeter street, and, 3. the commercial tract shall be preferably centrally located within the project (See Exhibit C attached) . The location proposed for commercial uses is on the south side of the entrance road at Congress Avenue, directly across from the Dos Lagos development. This location is in apparent conflict with the three qualifying statements listed above. This inconsistency is substantiated by the traffic impact analysis which demonstrates that 75% of the 3000 anticipated trips per day are generated from outside of the proposed PUD. -3- Comprehensive Plan policies There are three policies in the Comprehensive Plan which address annexations as follows: 1. "Annex only property which is reasonably contiguous to present municipal boundaries;" 2. "Annex property only after the preparation of a study evaluating the fiscal benefits of annexation versus the cost of providing service;" 3. "Annex only properties which are of sufficient size to provide efficient service and on which urban development is anticipated." In order to determine the consistency of the Ciklin annexation re- quest with the Comprehensive Plan policies, each of the three policies will be addressed individually. POlicy 1 - "Annex only property which is reasonably contiguous to present municipal boundaries." The Melear property is contiguous with the present corporate limits along its entire eastern boundary (approximately 2571 feet). In addition, contiguity exists for 2774 feet on the north and 1301 feet on the south. In total, the Melear tract is contiguous with existing corporate limits for approximately 60% of its entire boundary. Policy 2 - "Annex property only after the preparation of a study evalu- ating the fiscal benefits of annexation versus the cost of providing services." In response to Policy 2, you will find accompanying this memorandum, Exhibit 'D' which compares projected ad valorem taxes with required expenditures. POlicy 3 - "Annex only properties which are of sufficient size to provide efficient service and on which urban development is anticipated." As previously stated, the Melear tract is approximately 155 acres in size, and because of the availability of public utilities and existing and proposed roadway improvements, will soon experience urban development. Based on the findings of fact noted in the discussion of the Policies as applied to this annexation, it is apparent that the Ciklin request is consistent with the Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan policies concerning annexation. -4- Recommendation The Planning Department recommends that the applications submitted by Alan Ciklin for the Melear family for annexation and future land use amendment be approved as requested and that the rezonings re- quested be approved subject to the staff comments which accompany this memorandum as Exhibit 'E'. These recommendations are based on the following: 1. the parcel is contiguous to the corporate limits; 2. the parcel is in the path of urban development; 3. the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies for annexation; 4. the land use and zoning categories requested are both consistent with the land use plans and policies of Palm Beach County and Boynton Beach; 5. the requested annexation and zoning will not impair the surrounding properties in a manner that will inhibit future development; and, 6. the cost/benefit analysis of this request indicates that the impact of this proposal on municipal staff and programs will be substantial but that the taxes realized will off-set the projected municipal expenses. ~ d~"i#~;zeJ~ CARMEN (8. ANNUNZIA CITY PLANNER /bks -5- MEMORANDUM October 7, 1983 TO: Peter L. Cheney, City Manager FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato, City Planner RE: Civic Dedication - Melear Please be advised that the latest offer received from Alan Ciklin, attorney for the Melears, with regard to the civic dedication, is as follows: 1. The applicant will agree to dedicate a three-acre site with the following conditions: a. that any building constructed be limited to no more than two stories in height, b. that when the property is developed, a forty-foot buffer be provided adjacent to the land, c. that if the City ever desires to divest itself of this property, the property would revert to the dedicator, and d. no open storage is to be permitted on site. 2. That the City continue to make progress toward adopting a civic dedication ordinance and that this ordinance adoption procedure be completed within six months. 3. That the City will grant the applicant credits for two acres of land where the water re-pump facility is, in connection with his dedicating same. 4. That the applicant be permitted to pay capital facilities fees by plat, as opposed to up front, for the use of the master facilities installed by previous developers. eeL.- Carmen . c..5'r ~ ~__::z:c. S. Annunziato Ibks cc: James Vance City p:ttorney iea:a: CllKUn & mARrens LAW OFFICES Received Date Time ()/~) -- WILLIAM R. BOOSE. III ALAN J. C1KLlN. P.A, ANNI W, COLLETTE STEPHEN FRY RICHARD L. MARTENS, P.R. KERRY R, SCHWENCKE CORY J. C1KLlN 20 October 1983 Mr. Carmen Annunziato City Planner City of Boynton Beach P. O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Re: Melear PUD Dear Carmen: I've discussed the results of our on-going conversation with Larry Melear, representing the Melear family, and he has agreed to the following: 1) The Melear family will dedicate three (3) acres to the City for governmental services at the corner of Miner Road and Congress Avenue. The dedication is subject to the following: a) a 2-story height limitation on any building; b) a 40-foot landscaped buffer between the 3-acre site, and the abutting residential properties; c) no open storage; d) if the property ceases being used for governmental purposes, it will revert to the Melear family; e) the Melears will be able to continue to use the 3-acre site until the City notifies them in writing that construction will commence within sixty (60) days. 2) The Melear family will dedicate between 1.3 - 1.5-acres to the City for a water repump site to be located at the N. W. corner of the property. The Melears will receive a credit against the City's required payment of capital facilities fees. The amount of the credit will be determined by the current fair market value of the property, which will be agreed upon by the parties, or if the parties fail to agree, by an appraiser to be chosen by them. Upon dedication of the water repump site, the City will, within six (6) months, agree to fence the property and buffer along the property lines with trees, that when full grown will provide a visual buffer from the repump facility. In the event the City is able to locate an alternate site on adjacent property (i.e. Knollwood) suitable for the repump EIGHTH FlOOA' THE ConcOURSE' 2000 PAlM BEACH lRKES BlVD, WEST PAlM Bf.ACH ' FLOAlDA ' 33409 . (3051 689' 9595 Tll.tl 510,9521646 Mr. Carmen Annunziato 20 October 1983 Page Two facility, then, in that event, the repump site will revert to the Me1ears; they will pay the City any credits previuos1y taken, and will reimburse the City for fencing and landscaping. 3) Water and sewer charges which are required to be paid by developers within the City will be paid on a plat by plat, or phase by phase basis. The Me1ears will not be penalized for this payment arrangement unless amounts due have not been paid for a specific plat. 4) The City will agree to adopt an ordinance requiring land dedications for public purposes or cash in lieu thereof, within six (6) months from the date of approval of the Melear PUD. You have indicated that this matter will be scheduled for the November 1, 1983 meeting of the City Council, whereupon it will be removed from the table, discussed, and voted upon. I will assume that the matters set forth herein are acceptable to you, Mr. Cheney, and Mr. Cessna, unless I hear to the contrary. I appreciate your cooperation in this matter, and I believe that through the on-going discussions between the City's Staff and the Melear family, both parties will be proud of the end result. I AJC/ag ccs: Harry Johnston, Jr., Larry Melear, Jim Vance, & Ron Hoggard MEMORANDUM 25 October 1983 TO: Peter L. Cheney, City Manager FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato, City Planner RE: MELEAR PUD/ANNEXATION AGREEMENT Accompanying this memo you will find a copy of a proposed agreement with the Melear family which will allow the Melears to annex and meet the requirements imposed by the City. This agreement is substantially consistent with the discussions carried on over the last month. There is, however, an additional stipulation listed as Ie), although this does not appear to be a significant problem. At this point, I recommend that we proceed with the annexation and zoning of the Melear property based on the enclosed agree- ment and other staff comments. . ~A-- Carmen _' ----< } c" ~~ S. Annunzi /bks Attachment cc: P. Cessna, Director of Utilities Central File COMMENTS ON ANNEXATION MUNICIPAL STAFF INCREASED INCREASED DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL CAPITAL OTHER COMMENTS Public Works No Yes Personnel & Purchasing No No Police See attached Engineering No No See attached Energy No No See attached Building See attached Utili ties See attached Finance No No Data Processing No No Fire Department See attached Planning No No See attached Recreation and Parks See attached COMMENTS ON ANNEXATION PALM BEACH COUNTY STAFF DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Planning, Zoning & Building See attached COMMENTS ON ANNEXATION POLICE DEPARTMENT: This annexation, along with all other construction planned in the northwest area of the City will impact upon manpower needs in the future. The future needs have not as yet been determined. ENGINEERING DEPT.: Administration for construction of new subdivisions increases the work load, but the direct impact of this annexation alone is not significant as far as the Engineering Department work load goes. ENERGY DEPARTMENT: Developed public rights-of-way will presumably mean additional street lighting requirements at approximately $72 per year, per light, operation and maintenance only. BUILDING DEPT.: All annexations effect our department in the future pertaining to personnel, overall cost, etc. as the land is developed. UTILITIES DEPT.: Developer will be required to furnish capital costs for utilities. One developer will not increase manpower except meter reading, ultimately requiring added men. FIRE DEPARTMENT: See attached study. RECREATION & PARKS: See attached study. PLANNING DEPARTMENT: Billboards are to be removed within sixty (60) days of annexation. EXHIBIT 'E' STAFF COMMENTS ON CIKLIN REQUEST FOR ZONING TO PUD W/LUI = 4.0 UTILITY DEPARTMENT: See attached memo PLANNING DEPARTMENT: See attached memo RECREATION AND PARKS DEPT.: See attached memo CITY ATTORNEY: See attached letter MEMORANDUM September 8, 1983 TO: Mr.Carmen Annunziato city planner RE: Melear Property I approved the concept of the master plan subject to their providing an appropriate sized piece of land in the northwest corner of the property. This land will be approximately 250' x 300' in diameter. This is to accommodate a 2 million gallon ground storage re-pump station which will be approximately 25' high with a building to house the necessary pumps, controls and would be quite similar in'design, except for diameter, to the one on Woolbright Rd. and congress Avenue. (~ Cfi~ Perry A. Cessna, ' Director of utilities apt EXHIBIT 'e' COMMERCIAL STANDARDS. Commercial uses lo- cated in a PUD are intended to serve the needs of the PUD and not the general needs of a surrounding area. The maximum area within a PUD which may be devoted to neighborhood commercial uses, including required off-street parking requirements, is governed by Table I, section 4 and section 9C. Areas designated for commercial activities shall not generally front on exterior or perimeter streets, and shall be preferably centrally located within the project. MEMORANDUM 7 September 1983 TO: File FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato, City Planner RE: Ciklin Rezoning/Melear PUD Rezoning of this property is recommended subject to comments as follows: 1. relocate proposed commercial tract to the area shown as Phase 3 on the master plan; 2. dedicate acreage in southeast corner of the proposed PUD for public purposes; 3. dedicate all lands required for public improve- ments within sixty (60) days of rezoning of this property to PUD; and 4. prepare an agreement to comply with required traffic improvements as noted in Mr. Walker's letter of September 1, 1983 (attached) prior to the City Council requesting a waiver to Palm Beach County zoning and subdivision require- ments. ~/~,.?~ Carmen 3'. Annunziato ~ City Planner /bks '-y7 Board of County Commissione" "'.".. County Administrator John C. Sansbury ,-"":",,--,,,,-,-,-":.,.-:,'::t ~ee~s~il~:~~jc~~::~anRECIlIV:t;r) .,... Dennis P. Koehler Dorothy Wilken Bill Bailey DEe ?'. " pLANNING UC.ll. ,/t..,c,.. ...-.,'-~..-. .tJ Iii. \Ii . V\ {~/y\ J 0\f\W l:Ji' ~ "".....; November 23, 1983 Betty S. Boroni, City Clerk City of Boynton Beach 120 N.E. 2nd Avenue Boynton Beach, FL 33435 Dear Ms. Boroni: Thanks for your recent letter, along with a copy of Resolution No. 83-0000, requesting a certain parcel of land be rezoned. This document will be received, filed and made a part of the records in the County Courthouse. If I can be of further service to you, please feel free to call me. willi ~ wi'MI. r-L .U:\~ "- DOROl'HY H. WILKEN, County Carrnissioner District IV DHW/ad ce: John Sansbury, County Administrator w/attachrrent , 1\ , I BOX 1989 . WEST PALM BEACH, FLORiDA 33401 ./ t ! - County Administrator r, John C. Sansbury ,V J iJ \lV'<;V 1\ \~~. .~I 'V~' J~W " ~ ~ i BOJrd of County Commissioners RECEIVED l l l , ~ ~ j I ! Peggy B, Evatt, Chairman Ken Spillias. Vice Ch3irman Dennis P. Koehler Dorothy V,,'ilken Bill B3.iJt':V DEe :2 1983 PLANNlf,lG DEPT,' ~ ' "\ ; , November 28, 1983 Ms. Betty S. Boroni City Clerk City of Boynton Beach P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 Dear Ms. Boroni: I am in receipt of your letter and Resolution No. 83-0000 which was adopted by Boynton Beach City Council on November 15th re- garding rezoning of annexed land. I have forwarded the same to John Sansbury, County Administrator, to be placed on the Board of County Commissioners' Agenda in the near future. If I can be of any contact me. further assistance, please do not hesitate to ~'/;i',::~. /~7 ;z=. ~~/"..,_. /:=) /I'f":,/...~ ----.:;J-G-.....;-- 'j -;'7 (....' / \...---- ----- / - ,- Peggy B. Evatt ' Chairman Board of County Commissioners PBE:llm BOX 1989 . WEST PALM BEACH, P.O, BOX 310 120 N.E. 2ND AVENUE BOYNTON BEACH FLORIDA 33435 (305) 734-8111 CITY of BOYNTON BEACH OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR 24 January 1984 Alan J. Ciklin, Esq. Boose, Ciklin & Martens 2000 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Dear Alan: Accompanying this letter you will find a copy of Ordinances #83-46, 83-47, and 83-48 which annex, amend the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan, and rezone the Melear PUD. You will recall that the City and the Melears have to formalize an agreement for roadway improvements prior to the County Commission acting on a request for waiver. When this agreement is executed, we will forward same to the County Commission and County Staff for processing. Additionally, please let me remind you that consistent with Staff Comments on Annexation, all billboards are to be removed within sixty (60) days of annexation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours very truly, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH co..'.~.. S~ Carmen S. Annunziato Director of Planning /bks Enclosures cc: City Manager Central File ~ ._---_._--,_.,_._---.---------~~-'~-_.,- /'VI " JM~ ~1 lQf\A P\.f\~'~\\~(. DE-PT., t,' ',,", County Administrator 'O~u7 11.\ Board of County Commissioners Ken Spiilias, Chainnan Dorothy Wilken, Vice Chainnan Peggy B. Evatt Dennis p, Koehler Bill Bailey :.0 -n rVl'l'ED Jl,.\..-,,", ......... . .::;: ...~ ,..,..,) January 25, 1984 Ms. Betty Boroni, City Clerk City of Boynton Beach P. O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 Dear Ms. Boroni: This letter acknowledges receipt of City of Boynton Beach Ordinance No. 83-49 annexing a certain unincorporated tract of land that is contiguous to the City Limits within Palm Beach County and that will, upon its annexation, constitute a reason- ably compact addition to the city territory pursuant to a petition of the owner of said tract of land. Please be advised that the Palm Beach County Board of Comm- issioners officially received and filed the resolutions in their meeting of January 24, 1984. Copies of the resolutions were forwarded to the Planning, Zoning and Building Depart- ment for review and recommendations. ' /' . Very truly yours, ~ 0. ~ttL~ John C. Sansbury County Administrator JCS/LG/nb //;... ~\;\'5) 01-~V ~~'$~ ,,'f,...: ~f''i\i[.,';;,~ ~ .. 'N ~\ ~, '0j'Ol-\ t\\) :) '1 \. \ ~\\ <> ~ l..<;.'/.'f. (,~t; . .. cc: P, Z & B I BOX 1989 . WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 Board of County COl1\!llissioners County Administrator John C. Sansbury Ken Spillias. Chairman R' ~rit7f~~'\It'~,'.. <i Dorothy Wilken, Vice Chairma n~:Jfti V ~. ; Peggy B, Evatt Dennis p, Koehler BiB Bailey ,")I? ..--_._~ FE8 :3 W~~ PLANNING 13\';.\",l,. Ii' January 31, 1984 Ms. Betty Boroni, City Clerk City of Boynton Beach P. O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 Dear Ms. Boroni: We wish to acknowledge receipt of Ordinance No. 83-46 requesting permission to annex land that is contiguous to the City limits within Palm Beach County and that will constitute a reasonsably compact addition to the City territory. Please be advised that the Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners officially received and filed the ordinance in their meeting of January 31, 1984. Copies of the resolution were forwarded to the Planning, Zoning and Building Department for review and recommendations. Very truly yours, ~~\\- 0'. ~u-'dl\- John C. Sansbury County Administrator JCS/nb cc: P,Z & B BOX 1989 . WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 ;n~ 1-1// <<- <"'~D '-"" "', "f,', ' ,: ...., .':. ,. ~ P€"7brutlry IIJD4 J-C1.1ce ~.'i.. Vance 1 Er.:quirc 1615 Forui? Pl:lcC Barristers Building Dui 'ce ;~ GO i;(ieHL Palw Eeacb.; f'lo(1d8 33401 R<~: :":clG.3L"!City of E-:oynton n(~ach Dear l1iit:;: PI f,;:~UjC; f tnd enc 10eed two (2) origirtally ;:;:.:i.ccutcd Hal' .rfLnty Deccls conveying the "civic site" as well as the ~wate( utility Litc"~ In a<Joitionr please find en~lo:Jecl the ori~:inal }\9i.:'eer:ient Li.;~twc:en the City and tile f1elear family, for COllutruction of roadway ilnr(ovoments~ It should b~ ex~cuted by the appropriat~ City official witlJ a xerox copy ()f the execute~ original rcturn~~ to me for my records.. Also, pleaae retllrn a recorded co~y ci: each de<i!c1 to r;,,,, l1pon i tf. t",t.nn, frOIn the Clerk. Ii you h~V6 any quest1ons7 please 6on~t hesitate to ce:l lne. I bclj,~\1e this conclud.es id.l out requireUi;Jntt'.~ tor the L:{3;':";CnJ,_r;s~ and annexation. Bincer<21y l' Alan J. C:lklin lwei i;ig BnclosureB cc: Larry l:elear wi enclosures Carmen Annunziato w/cnclosuc6z iBCXEE ClllKUn & mARfEns LAW OFFICES FEB 1 ~,lC!;:U PLANNi,,(J DEyr., WILLIAM R. BOOSE, III ALAN J. CIKLlN. P,A. CORY J, C1KLlN ANNI W, COLLETTE STEPHEN FRY RICHARD L. MARTENS. PA. KERRY R SCHWENCKE Be p:T7'''-~r':'iJ iL~ .'--"_L.i_,,-'~ ~. ~..... 10 February 1984 Mr. Carmen Annunziato City Planner City of Boynton Beach P. O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Re: Melear PUD - Billboards Dear Carmen: In the past we've discussed the removal of the billboards from the Melear property. Larry informs me that t.he billboard companies have a lease with the Melears until June. If acceptable, we would like to honor those leases, and upon their termination we will have the billboards removed. I will assume that this is acceptable unless I hear from you to the contrary. Thanks for your cooperation. AJC/ag cc: Larry Melear EIGHTH FLOOR, THE ConcOURSE' 2000 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD, WEST PALM BEACH' FlOAlDA ' 33409 ' 13051 669' 9595 TWH 510,952,7646 P.O. BOX 310 120 N_E. 2ND AVENUE BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA 33435 (305) 734-8111 CITY of BOYNTON BEACH OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR 14 February 1984 Alan J. Ciklin, Boose, Ciklin & 2000 Palm Beach Suite 800 West Palm Beach, FL Esq. Martens Lakes Blvd. 33409 Dear Alan: The purpose of this letter is to respond to your request concerning the delay in implementation of an annexation requirement which would result in the removal of the billboards on the Melear property within sixty (60) days of annexation. Given the fact that the billboard leases expire in June of this year, the City does not object to the removal being made coincidential with the expiration of the leases. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Yours very truly, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH c ""--"- ,-10 ct~ Carmen S. Annunziato Director of Planning /bks cc: City Manager Central File CiTY of BOYNTON BEACH ~ f P. O. BOX 310 120 N.E. 2ND AVENUE BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIOA 33435 ------' --- ~--.--.. ~_.-'O-~_=,_. . -----=---,.' -'i i --, "fe. , .-,-- - -~ =5J--~~:'J ':-'''''M'" " .~ Il;;~--- -...c- .....-_ .' ~Z.i1~' . ~1o.i ",,'-fC~,'-.':~~'.;lI~':;';;C::"-"'_:';' .:; -",':"'-'ffl)'.',, ,.~.<, ,',.'r~.' . '. :' ~'''.?'''~-~,.....'' '1"11-. ...: ~ . " , _~",:1?~'~~ '~~:'~;J' '~~m, ,',.. ;" . . .-."~ --.. ~--~-,~;,. ~~- ',- - f-o . - '---. - _. _.._._~-- . ~~~ ~i~,~~.?"~ ~ March 12, 1984 Mr. Richard Morley, Senior Planner Palm Beach County Planning, Bldg. & Zoning Dept. 3400 Belvedere Road West Palm Beach, FL 33406 (\\y t"~ Dear ~rr. Morley: Enclosed please find copies of the following recorded documents: 1) Warranty Deed with Exhibit A dated February 1, 1984, between Carrilla l<!elear, La.rry .layne Ne1ear, and Hichael Raymond Helear and the City of Boynton Beach (Water tank site) 2) Ivarranty Deed with Exhibit A dated February 1, 1984, between Carilla Melear, Larry Wayne ~le1ear and Hichael Raymond Melear and the City of Boynton Beach (Public land) If we can be of any further service, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, /'. /' CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH Betty S. Baroni City Clerk J BSB/smk Enclosures cc: C. Annunziato Planning Director