REVIEW COMMENTS
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-525
TO:
Jim Cheraf
City Attorney
FROM:
-/-:::;J}
Tambri J, Heyden ~
Planning and Zoning Director
DATE:
October 8, 1996
RE:
Rezoning of water tank site on Miner Road and reduction of Hills of Lake
Eden preserve area
The phone messages I've left you pertain to the following issues, about which I need
your assistance:
1, As directed by the city manager, staff is starting to prepare the land use
amendment and rezoning application for the city owned, water tank/Sprint
telecommunication tower site zoned PUD (proposed PU zoning), In order to
modify the PUD master plan to delete the property from the PUD, must a master
plan modification application be signed by all the PUD property owners as part of
the unified control, or other, requirements?
I've attached a copy of the deed for the property (the property was dedicated by
the PUD to the city) for your review for possible determination that the rezoning
may not be necessary. Also, staff has met with the owner of the undeveloped
portion of the PUD who wants to submit a master plan modification to obtain
approval of townhouses rather than approved apartments.
2, When the Hills of Lake Eden PUD rezoning came before the Commission earlier
this year the approved master plan showed a total preservation area of 1,30
acres, The minimum set aside required by the comprehensive plan and now the
code is 25%, or 1,05 acres for this PUD, The developer would like to reduce the
preserve total to the minimum 1,05 acres, Can this be done without going back
to the Commission or can the Commission take the position that as part of the
PUD negotiations they required more than the minimum 1.05 acres? Attached
are the Commission minutes wherein I've highlighted this discussion.
T JH:dim
Attachments
xc: Carrie Parker
Central File
C:MINER-RDWPD
DRAINAGE STATEMENT
FOR
MELEAR PUD
This
Statement
office has been retained to prepare a n~ainage
to address the drainage implications of the proposed
to the Master Plan of the Melear PUD.
revisions
The essence of the proposed changes to the Master Plan is
the changing of the housing types in Phases II, III & IV. It
is proposed to construct 181 single family and 492 apartment
units instead of the 77 single family, 273 quadraplex and 323
condominium units previously planned.
According to the Master Plan prepared by Urban Design
Studio, the development area along with the lake area will
stay substantially the same. Thus, no substantial changes in
the overall drainage design will be necessary to accommodate
these proposed Master Plan changes.
This site is in the Lake Worth Drainage District and
drainage discharge is regulated by that agency. The South
Florida Water Management District also has permitting
authority for this site. Permits for this project have been
issued by both of these agencies. These permits will have to
be modified to accommodate the development of the remainder of
this project.
Prepared By:
GERS, P.E.
Fla. ego No. 24068
September 26, 1988
K.S. ROGERS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC.
1495 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite F
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
(407) 964-7300
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
MELEAR PUD
CONGRESS AVENUE & MINER ROAD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
SEPTEMBER 26, 1988
Prepared By:
K. S. ROGERS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC.
1495 Forest Hill Boulevard
3uite F, Centre Place Professional Park
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
407-964-7300
~~/gB
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1
LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 2
EXISTING ROADWAY
CONDITIONS
FIGURE 3
DISTRIBUTED
TRAFFIC
FIGURE 4
A.M. PEAK HOUR
VOLUMES
FIGURE 5
P.M. PEAK HOUR
VOLUMES
INTRODUCTION
This office has been retained to prepare a Traffic Impact
Analysis for the proposed revision to the Master Plan for the
Melear PUD. This 154.6 acre parcel is located on the west
side of Congress Avenue and the south side of Miner Road, in
the City of Boynton Beach, Florida. This project originally
received approval from the City in 1983. Of the original five
phases, only the first phase, the Sandalwood Development, has
been constructed.
This Analysis has been performed in order to determine
the volume of traffic expected to be generated by this project
at such time that this project is completely constructed and
completely occupied, the effect that the generated traffic
will have on the area's roadways and to make recommendations
on what roadway improvements, if any, are necessary as a
result of the approval of this project. In conformance with
the City Planning Department's policy this Analysis has been
performed with the criteria established in the City's Zoning
Code and the recently adopted Palm Beach County Traffic
Performance Standards Ordinance #87-18.
Existing traffic counts which were available from the
Metropolitan Planning Organization and the Palm Beach County
Traffic Division were used, when applicable, and these counts
were augmented by twenty-four (24) hour machine counts and
peak hour hand counts performed by this office.
SITE INFORMATION
As shown in Figure 1, this parcel is located on the
southwest corner of Congress Avenue and Miner Road. All
access to the development parcel will be onto Sandalwood Drive
which traverses through the project from Congress Avenue to
Miner Road.
,
w ;6-1
>
. (
0 0 0 0
<( <( <( >
0 0 0 .J
II: II: a: ID
-............ ./ 3^'f or -, SS3110NO~
a:' I
I I
a:Vi I
,\1 ,_J
_I ,
:llJ
...
c
.. Z
..
W 0
!::: :t .... %
Z V
en z ~ <(
0 W
ID OJ
O'fOll 3~N3I1M'f'
<( 0
)( z
Z ::l 0
<( .J ....
.... 0 z
z ... Q ~
<( ~ .J 0
.J %
0 ID
'IYII.L All'f.LI'.1I
~ .
J
l s rogers, consulting dole
SEPT 88
engineer, Inc. LOCATION MAP figure
wesl palm beach, fl
1
- -,-,-~-",-,----,---,,-,--~"--'-------'--~' "--,------
The revisions to the new Master Plan center around a
change in the housing type of the unbuilt units. The number
of single family units and rental apartments increased while
the townhouse units decreased and the multi-family
condominiums have been deleted entirely. The new Master Plan
has maintained the 3.1 acre commercial site. A breakdown of
the residential land uses for the proposed and the old Master
Plans are:
PROPOSED
MASTER PLAN
LAND USE
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
MASTER PLAN
181
332
Single Family
Quads I Townhouse
Condominium
Apartment
TOTAL
77
417
323
188
1005
492
1005
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS
Congress Avenue, adjacent to this site, is a four lane
divided roadway. Miner Road was constructed from Congress
Avenue to Sandalwood Drive in order to provide access to this
site. Miner Road is scheduled to be extended westerly to
Lawrence Road. However, for the purposes of this Analysis the
extension to Lawrence Road shall not be considered to be
constructed.
Figure 2 shows
Level of Service "CO
the
and
existing
volumes,
the
existing
exist.
VIC
the capacity at
ratio for these
roadway segments as they presently
-2-
'" SlI-I
>
c /
"'Igoo
0>0_
"'0 '
- "'",0
Q Q r T T Q Q
C C "'0- "'0- _000 c >
0 0 "'000 ...0'" "'0'" 0 .J
a: a: "too '<too <coo a: ..
"'''' ",,", ",,,,
....... ./ 3^Y 10 ~ r- SSnI!)NO:>
, ,
,
'<to<Ca: VI'
cn.....ow I r-J
"C")oz
- i I I
.J g12'"
M-~
,....~O
"
C
N 2:
N
W 0
I- :t I- :z:
en 2: U
Z >- C
0 '"
.. ..
aYOII 30N3IIMYl
c 0
'" z
z ::> 0
c .J l-
I- 0
Z Z
C ... Q >-
>- .J 0
.J :z:
0 ..
llYII.L AIIY.LI1I..
>-
f-
a Q
0< f-
~
,
J
-Q. <
tt:< c:
<0
0: 0
.-0.;;
-'0
"0.,,
o z3:cnz
- en 0-
Z ~UJ...Jt;
W _0: _
C) x:c....x
l1J W)- c(UJ
..J
"'10
,",0
...0
...0
"''''
00
o
':?n(:pne'~r, Inc
wpst palm beach, fl
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS
dale
SEPT 88
hgure
2
l s logers. consulting
GENERATION
The generation rates used in this Report were obtained
from "Trip Generation Fourth Edition", Institute of
Transportation Engineers,
Vehicular Traffic Generation
1987,
"1981
Update
Within
Study of
Palm Beach
Characteristics
County", prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates and the
traffic study submitted in 1983 with the original Rezoning
Petition, "Traffic Impact Analysis for a Portion of Section
18-45-43": prepared by William F. Mulhearn, P.E., January 27,
1983. The generation (driveway volume) calculated for this
project is based as follows:
NO. OF GENERATION
LAND USE UNITS RATE TRIPS
Single family 181 10 tpd/unit 1810
Quad-plex 332 7 tpd/unit 2324
Apartment 492 7.5 tpd/unit 3690
Commercial 30,000 s.L 100 tpd/lOOO s.L 2250 *
TOTAL 10,074
* The same 25% internal factor which was used in
the Mulhearn Report was utilized in this Report.
Applying the same generation rates to the land uses to
that of the previously approved Master Plan, the generation
can be calculated as follows:
NO. OF GE:NE:RATION
LAND USE UNITS RATE TRIPS
Single family 77 10 tpd/unit 770
Townhouse 417 7 tpd/unit 2919
Condominium 322 7 tpd/unit 2254
Apartment 188 7.5 tpd/unit 1410
Commercial 30,000 s.t. 100 tpd/lOOO s.f. 2250
TOTAL 9603
-3-
Comparing the volume expected from the proposed Master
Plan with that which was previously approved, it is calculated
that the revised Master Plan is expected to generate an
average of 471 trips per day more than the volume previously
approved.
According to Article IV, Section 2 (b), only the traffic
generated by a proposed project which is in excess of the
volume previously approved shall be subject to provisions of
the Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. Thus, this
Report shall address the impact of the additional 471 trips.
TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION
The traffic distribution for this project was prepared
according to the distribution analysis which was previously
prepared by this office in the report "Traffic Distribution
Study for Melear PUD", April, 1987. Based upon the
proceeding, the traffic distribution for this project was
determined and is shown below:
NORTH
EAST
SOUTH
WEST
38.1%
17.3%
31.4%
13.2%
The distributed traffic is shown in Figure 3.
EFFECT ON ROADWAY CAPACITY
The Traffic Performance Standards
project with an "Insignificant Impact"
generates less than 1% of the capacity
which it directly accesses.
Ordinance defines a
as a project which
of the roadway upon
-4-
The distributed volumes for this project and the 1%
threshold volumes are shown in Figure 3. A review of these
volumes show that this project will not generate more than 1%
of the capacity of any of the roadway links directly accessed
by this project. This project, therefore, is defined as an
"Insignificant Project". An "Insignificant Project" can be
approved if the following two conditions are met:
a. the volume to capacity ratio lv/c) on the
directly accessed links does not exceed 1.5.
b. a fee, in addition to the Fair Share Contribution
for Road Improvements Fee, is paid in accordance
with Table 3 - "Insignificant Project Fee", as
presented in the Traffic Performance Standards
Ordinance.
The existing vlc ratios are shown in Figure 2. The vlc
ratio for Congress Avenue is 0.81 and the v/c ratio for Miner
Road is 0.06 on those links adjacent to the site. As the vlc
ratio does not exceed 1.0 on any directly accessed roadway
link, an Insignificant Project Fee will not be required.
PEAK HOUR
The peak hour volumes have been calcLlated in order to
ascertain if any additional roadway improvements are necessary
to accommodate the additional traffic expected to be generated
by this project. For this Report, both the A.M. and P.M. peak
hour volumes were calculated and analyzed. The peak hour
volumes were calculated as follows:
A.M.
P.M.
7.54% of ADT
10% of ADT
= 0.075(471) =
= 0.10(471)
36
= 47
IN
IT
28
OUT
25
19
-5-
w !lll-l
>
.. (
0 0 " 0 0
.. .. " " .. >
0 0 00 "'0 -0 0 ..J
a: a: _0 "'0 <00 a: ..
",,,, -'" "''''
......... ./ 3^Y 0, -r: SS311!lNO:>
" a: I
"'-
O"'a:~_ I
.... _w J
z C'
_I I
:I J
"
c
'" Z
'"
W 0
.... %
!:: ~ Z <J
rn Z >- ..
0 W
.. ..
aYOll 3:>N311MY1
..
z
..
....
z
..
..J
o
><
::)
...
o
...
>-
%
z
o
....
z
>-
o
..
o
..J
o
'IYlI.l
AllY J.11'"
~
(
....
(.)
<....
wecU
::l:::l:<
o:::t-Q..
U::...J~~
u..Oz-
<><1-
II: U Z
.....0-<
O -'!::o
z I-Oz-
W oJ:C!)~
WCI)-Z
<.!)""':lw<n"
LUOa:a:(i;
...J ex::I: 0 z
0..1-1.1.._
-0
<00 "
"''''
r k 5, rogers. consulting
'7nglneer. Inc.
WPsl pnlm bp()ch, fi
DISTRIBUTED TRAFFIC
date
SEPT 88
figure
3
These peak hour volumes were assigned to the project's
driveways and are shown in Figures 4 and 5. In order to show
the complete impact, the previous volumes, as presented in the
Mulhearn Report, were added to these volumes.
A capacity analysis was prepared for the intersections
shown in Figures 4 and 5. These analyses concluded that the
roadway improvements which were recommended in the Mulhearn
Report, a left turn lane and right turn lane on Congress
Avenue at the intersection with Sandalwood Drive and the
signalization of the same intersection, are adequate to
accommodate the additional traffic expected to be generated by
this request. Thus, no additional roadway improvements are
required as a result of the additional traffic generated by
this revised Master Plan.
CONCLUSION
The proposed revisions to the Master plan of the Melear
PUD are expected to generate an average of 461 additional
trips per day. It is concluded, even with the number of
additional trips, that this revision to the Master Plan
creates an "Insignificant Impact" on the major roadway system.
A review of the peak hour volumes further concludes that no
additional roadway improvements are necessary as a result of
this proposed Mater plan revision.
Therefore, it is
this proposed Master
approved as requested.
the
Plan
conclusion
revision to
of this Analysis that
the Melear PUD can be
-6-
7i , ,
en
en 0
0 Cl
0 a:
<
..J
~ ~
-~...
~N<o '- (09 )0
---
000 -(~S9)0
3 NIl ) I , ..- (L6 )9 SS3lJ8NO::>
r (v~~ )0 ~ '\ I ( , I
I
01 (99~ ~)O- ~~~ I
(6~ ~ )~ "" 0>0'"
0> '"
(31 "'~'" I
~o~
a:, - I
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
I w I
l-
I Cii I
~ I I
'" I
... I
'" I I
, ''-(9H)6 I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I r ---- __________-.-1
, I
I I
a: I____~
0
~
:::;:
UJ
::;
::>UJ
...J::;
0::>
>...J
Ot-O
u>
ZUJ...J
W"'..
ClOt-
WO:O
..J "-t-
",;0
~
k, s rDgers, consulting dote
engineer, Inc AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES SEPT 66
we'it pdm beoch, fL ligUle
4
li , ,
rJ)
rJ) 0
0 C!l
0 0:
<(
..J
~ ~
- ~....
~ 0(0 "- (BS )0
~~-
000 -'(l9~~)0
3^," ) I ,...- (66~ )9~ SS31:l~NO:>
,- (vl ~)O --' ~ , f I
I
01 (9SLH - NN~ I
(S9l)9 " .... '"
~I --- I
';too
0:1 - I
I 1
I
I 1
I I
I I
I w I
t-
I Cii I
;;1 I
::: I I
.... I I
, '''-(BO~)9 1
I I
I I
I I
I 1
I ,- ____ ___~_____-.J
I 1
I
0: L___-.J
0
~
::;:
W
::;
::oW
....::;
0::0
0> ....
Z ....0
W () >
C!l W""
W -,..
..J 0....
ero
0.....
~
....:;;
-
~
k s, rog'='fS, consulting Jote
engineer, inc PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES SEPT 88
. ..-t , "lip, l;.,)(:, II hgure
" -.) t-'- ,t
5
~~:; )~~
M E M 0 RAN D u J[ime /t/..//Y)
October 26, 1983
TO: Mr. Peter L. Cheney
City Manager
RE: Melear PUD/Annexation Agreement
I have reviewed Carmen's memo and Allan Ciklin's letter to
Carmen and have one comment on paragraph 3.
They are asking to only pay their up front share of the ex-
isting water lines on a phase by phase basis. If this is
done, it will set a precedent for other developments who
will be wanting the same type of treatment.
In making this statement, I am not necessarily against it,
but I think it is a policy decision that should be carefully
considered before granting this.
Also, in the same vien, as you know, we have a construction
index increase included in the penalities. If the above is
agreed ~pon, it should be clearly stated that the penalities,
as related to the construction index increase, will vary as
time goes on so that there is no question,at a later date,
as to what was meant.
~ a~
perry~na,
Director of utilities
apt
CC:
Mr.Carmen Annunziato,~
City Planner
R"'wed~~
C "te (:9
Time Ci:~
TO: Mr. Peter L. Cheney, City Manager
~
M E M 0 R.A N DUM
October 13, 1983
RE: Melear Property
On Tuesday I had conversation with Carmen about the above. Mr.
Allen Ciklin has apparently made a proposal to resolve the
land donation problem connected with this annexation.
One of the requests in the proposal is that they be allowed to
pay their share of the costs of the Congress Avenue lines by
plat or by phase.
In reviewing the ordinance, I do not see where it clearly speci-
fies when this up front money should be paid.
You know that Rick Rossi has brought this subject up regarding
Riteco's development (Congress Lakes). You also realize that
we have not made a firm determination as to when and how this
money will be collected from DeBartola.
I can certainly understand the problems involved to a developer
of a large tract of land in having to pay up front as much as
two or three hundred thousand dollars, in addition to all the
other costs involved in getting started. On the other hand,
I can certainly see that we required five developers to put up
a million dollars in advance, to get the line in.
I believe that this would have to be a policy decision, based
upon your recommendation and council's action. As you know,
in the Congress Avenue corridor, we give credits of approxi-
mately $400,000.00. Carmen raised the question as to whether
the ~~ loss of interest penalty, as prescribed by ordinance,
is a per year cost or a one time cost.
I talked with Allen Ciklin last night and advised him that it
was a policy decision and that I would discuss it with you,
on your return and then advise him accordingly. He would like
an answer early next week, if at all possible.
Q:~Qn~
apt Director of utilities
CC:
Mr.Carmen Annunziato,city Planner
Received' O~
Date f.--/t,-~
M E M 0 RAN DUM T '/J..-wJ
ime --Ff'- I
September 15, 1983
TO: Carmen Annunziato, City Planner
RE: Melear P.U.D,
I've received the letter from Melear's attorney and find items
#1 and #2 acceptable.
Based on the letter, I recommend the project receive one half
(~) credit for private recreational facilities provided as reflected
on the formula calculation presented in my memorandum dated 9/7/83.
'Q
,r' "
./' . ,,"- '- ,
~,-;e:~-,>~~ .
----
Charles C, Frederick, Director
Recreation & Park Department
CCF:pb
CC: John Wildner, Parks Supt. wiatt.
II'
~
"'
MEMORANDUM
9 September 1983
r
TO:
Peter L. Cheney, City Manager
FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato, City Planner
RE: PUBLIC LANDS PER CAPITA
Accompanying this memo you will find a list of non-
recreational public lands. When computed on a per capita
basis based on the 38,102 population estimate provided by
the BEBR as of April 1, 1983, the acreage is .00233 acres
per person. For your information, this would result in a
necessity of 5.03 acres for non-recreational uses at the
proposed Melear PUD based on 1005 units, 2.15 people per
unit and .00233 acres per person.
c ~ 0 C:~.:L.o!',X
Carmen S. Annunziato t:/
City Planner
jbks
cc:
City Manager
Melear Master Plan
,-f
.':' ~
~"",
.,~
, ""
PER CAPITAL CALCULATIONS
r
88.79
38102
=
x
1
.00233 = x acres/person
Also .89 ac for lift stations
MEMORANDUM
September 7, 1983
TO: Carmen Annunziato, City Planner
RE: Melear P.U.D.
Based on our T.R.B. meeting of September 6th, Melear representatives
are to provide written documentation to include:
1. List of specific recreational facilities to be
provided, including size and/or number of each
facility.
2, Provide adequate written guarantee that each
phase of development will include adequate space
and facilities for private recreation based on
sub-division regulations, (These are in addition
to the common facilities as presented at the
T.R.B. meeting,)
Assuming that written documents submitted are adequate and proper,
recommend one-half (y,) credit be given for public land dedication and
that the fee in lieu of land be required.
Based on the proposed units:
.018 x 83 units
.015 x 922 units
Land dedication requirement....
1. 49 Acres
13,83 Acres
15,32 Acres
~ -..~-......
One-half credit for adequate private recreation facilities reduces
the requirement to 7.66 acres to be provided in equivalent dollars.
-'
C~7~-/b'
Charles C. Frederick, Director
Recreation & Park Department
CCF:pb
CC: John Wildner, Parks Supt,
:,~'Lif{l tlf ('flllIl1~ COlllllli,,,il)Jl~'p'
COlm1\ .\dl1lilli....lr:lll1f
J...~,~,-, .: [\at1, C1l.lirm:m
.~l'11 SpiJli;,.... \'in: Ch:lirm:llI
1 >calli..; P Kochlt."T
Dnroth) Wilkl'1l
Bill ILlill'\
J, L;; ( ~,~ ,: :!' \
September 1, 1983
-/.-'
-:< ,,' HI.'
. . ----...:...:'
/v.>::' ~,.~l
f-f'" \r.
,.,\ ,....' C, ',' \_
-.J >, '/ ~ .,,)_
\ 1\ ,_)
, :.... '- - ,
\ r" ~/
"\.:_~..JI'-~'\"'/"
""-<-.;....-.
DC;Jarlrnrfll 01 EnCli:l(>f'rl<IQ
inl,1 Fuhlir: \":or~;~
H. F. K.1hlrr1
Coun~y E:lgineer
Mr. Carmen S. Annunziato
City Planner ,
City of Boynton Beach
120 N. E. 2nd Avenue
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
SUBJECT: Proposed Melear, P.U,D.
Dear Mr. Annunziato:
This is to confirm our meeting of August 30 with yourself and the developer
of Melear, P,U.D., in which the developer agreed to certain conditions which
would allow his project to meet the requirements of the traffic performance
standard. The proposed development is a category A project, i.e., one having
a significant impact on a road or roads which are already operating at or
above level of service D. As this is the case, the project must limit it's
traffic to less than a significant impact on two category A road links, those
being Lantana Road and Hypoluxo Road between Congress Avenue and 1-95. Our
calculations indicate that project development should be limited to 50% of
the residential units, with the balance of the residential units and all of
the commercial not being allowed to develop until Lantana Road and Hypoluxo
Road are constructed as four lane facilities. Additionally, this project
should be required to:
1)
Dedicate 108 feet of right of way for and
the project's north property frontage.
construct Miner Road across
, ~.~'-
, ,
2)a) Reimburse the County for the cost of constructing left turn lanet""'..",.<-._.....
the project's entrance on Congress Avenue and at Miner Road, These
turn lanes will be included in the Congress Avenue four laning project
currently under contract. The County will bill the developer for this
work based on unit prices at the time of Congress Avenue construction.
b) Construct right turn lanes on Congress Avenue at the project's entrance
and at Miner Road. These turn lanes should be constructed at the time
the project's entrance road and Miner Road are built.
3) Pay the cost of signalization at the following intersections, when war-
ranted, as determined by the County Engineer:
a) Congress Avenue and Miner Road.
b) Entrance Road and Miner Road.
c) Entrance Road and Congress Avenue,
4) Pay "Fair Share Impact Fee" upon issuance of building permits.
BOX 2429
WEST PALM EEACH. FLORIOA 33402
(305) GS~4000
--------.---- ---~---~-
Page Two
As we discussed, it is anticipated that the City will enter into a formal
agreement with the developer to ensure that all of these conditions are
complied with in order that this project would meet the requirements of the
traffic performance standard.
The opportunity to comment is, sincerely appreciated.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not
hesitate to contact this office.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
Charles R. Ha1ker, Jr., P.E.
Director, Traffic Division
CRW&ct
cc: Stan Redick
August 1, 1983
MEMURANDUll
TO; Carmen Annunziato
FROM;
Ronald Hoggard
fL+
RE: Larry Melear additional services
The following revisions were made to the Master Plan. Since
there is no effect to the Drainage or Water and Wastewater
P~ans. they have not been revised to accommodate these changes.
Revisions to Master Plan
Phase 1
Townhouses (west)
Before
Now
units
D.U./AC.
146
6.0
151
6.2
Townhouses (east)
units
acres
D.U./AC.
185
30.9
6.0
180
29.1
6.2
Added 1.8 AC. Rec. area.
Phase III
Quads
AC.
D.U./AC.
Added 1.2 AC. Rec. area.
32.1
9.0
30.9
9.4
Change corresponding site data figures.
RRH/meb
cc; Alan Cicklin of Boose, Cicklin & Martens
Rick Rossi of Rossi and Malavasi Engineers
82-565.2