REVIEW COMMENTS
w}
J /, .
-----
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO 91-113JC
June 27, 1991
TO: James Cherof
City Attorney
VIA: J. Scott Miller
City Manager
FROM: Vincent A. Finizio
Administrative Coordinator of Engineering
RE: FELIX GRANADOS, JR.
PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST
COPIES OF DOCUMENTS PROVIDED TO MR. GRANADOS, JR.
Attached for your review and consideration, are copies of each document provided
Mr. Granados from both Engineering Department and Planning Department files.
These documents were located in the Citrus Glen files and the Melear PUD files.
Total number of documents provided herein equal 51 copies. A copy of the receipt
is attached for your files and records.
Vincent A.
VAF/ck
cc: Christopher Cutro, Director of Planning
W. Richard Staudinger, P.E" Gee & Jenson Consulting Engineers
RECEIVED
JIM 2S
PLANNING DEPT~
J. - p~ L~,~"C,' c<.i. 1: .J,' J W.J
{-jv~'Ft ~,,:J-:#J-
k
l
7
{x' ~
J
y;
s'
L=lE/iR PLA-N)Jr:{)
Ti< ti ft,O (t? ,v.lA<; uJ -' i C J
UNIT /)fVL::Lo/~I7I;:';VT
" ;' I I
, eM, &( , i <> t s.. c '" 5?- Ve c(ooo
To fll /),,:..~ jv" T {3 co clEve r !J/t, r ,ffztl+lJr-b-w:A-c5- b,&J1:'f) ("::.-j) _
( hi) II ~ f <; (, J /II )f c)f 0 (5' r ( J;tc To (lL~ v'>o }/j) te}) ).tow:')
_.,~
c!- /;;e ~
J 'I './
-:J 1.- 5" i,.. I C / S
z~' (,1.
T J - I 1'" LA ).1
-I,...." e, ',' v ~ )" ,q,~ O,I, ,I ~ ~<'r" ~ f, 0 q / . iJ, 0 I I" (1 llr~ "'. IJ'
!)t)(r{ < ~ k" ",[ ~ "'-, 1- I' i L'. ':'J:'" ""'to] f 5 Jf."iDt' '~,'" ~/ '/- rj'" '-,-
",I;/A.t '~.'r O~G~V, ~""~':TI;1,I"'c'~'s sL",i! WC,f[.,e. y,,~
.<"! -" V f' k I ~".)' / 11\ , [;1,' "''' ~ ~ ''''' r (" IA L, Vv ,,. l (': Y'; L f-
I"; (Jiil.t "! ,r' r I "
o frtc. .',;clA.!~C;()'("f,'.~~' L,vu'o-(/I,~f'i'~ ,{~"t5(ikc C
f , " J ' , 1, {. " ~
(v"'." , I, - i /, ; '( v ," " , A. I ~ } <. Y i VI<, I' ", vJ" t:1 t f} / Sr r"1 f [C'
" ~'r L" J S L" t: f 5 P V( j) t I" <'. V (','" ~, ", < f j Ii ,. If "L /::.. .5' [ '" II'
t' .' r r I
co ro t I. ,i r.
~~ ~
J irt-.;. C) (o/l. (It (.t t' ) S
, (
, f I/',
WI V\ .)f'Lt-,6JV\
{if' (J: '
J <<- v .'
[), "'- [,
/' ,(' j -" ^ (, / f'
'" ()" VI ".< c .J. - ~ ,) (,1,1 "',J f- & i: (O,i":5 J ,S 1-, '"
/ oFf A vf:\" fe- 1; 0 F Arc,~ v, of, iC )L ) ,
f'1 ~ / / : ~J I @ f f C (, C' ~/ ~ f b J,~ 'I /. v/
(,/ 1... v{ '" ''t. A.. V( C. (~ <'~ I
\""1.5 ( C' "1..5. ).
/ 0 -/
Co-0:cot"
A +. ~tt / - ,^' I f I' (' ( !
IT ; 'i i 11\1, e (/ r Q L-(! { f 1/'1 I Vi -< \..y ~ "t. .0-,e... 1,.." V<'L 7 <: v i- I\e .5 " L..'.J- e -
{<( "'I' / y f v ~ I ~ f {Fe ,,~ fJi J cz:~ r " iVl <S f {< S" t We ,'f t, J
r r (' I' )1" [" I (I-
Vvl,,'tk,t",,'f"'/ rrLev1L,p"J'^ "JLlt ",k.!> f:rC'<<l' !l~
i ilL L 1/ v~ i~} .5 L ! lJ " L 1:.>): Ie v cr"/' ;; C~f: ", v""!~'J (~00" JI jS L 'r WI';)
t' (A r ,0 ( 't' .scJ . \ L l,.lt c< '<.& C If. " 0 fLL k d_~ j : '" C_'. r '7'" ,; ", ..J ;.1 ~ '1 ,-,isfl
~ L< 0 ~ ,~ ~,(, C "',5 I !i t-e,~ ,,[A.-, f ~ {, / ~,y (",0 i: >>' c C''j'' f....,. "
t ( , '" 1.<., ~r L\v. J ""-' J ten' ,I d ( , ~ I ( rL-\.' ,,, o,,<<<""l ,'7 I- "J,,~ )
A '{', I i'- ({J' / l J ! /
/t~"r~"9~\....'~ t 1J,\-t~(!V-- _-{h(;.J~(I" ~L' iV\_(~Vv(;\LA:/e, h-:.,j\Nel;v{'
c(. , U ([' .. ,,^ . t ,,ox r ,'I
i G. ~ 5, "7': <'. j' "", [./ 10 f; i vL ," ~ < j C ] t{ ~ j f [., e., /~ ',IA. 'v t' '" /A. 0
V iJ lJ - < r w? ',: r k,'{ j" t(, ~ / (h I'J t ~v!) , <, ," J n1(, ~ 't
,_ ,"~ .I, I ,
ej ~ 5f ~,"''-l j "lfVji l/t1, 1,;)< I ~~.r,? vt. &/~. .r"-~cr (;j i) .W~~/O'I"l. G1o/\.. 5 ~~! P_)p ( I <::i.- :-,'~' IiI
0,,,1..11 --'>~I<t1..... c LIe, je /(j,tl C, t'[~ ''''1..cA'l..'~'''<<'I' I "
v ..., -... 0, t' ,S' ,
0,
~ 1
:[.. f'c,,'..n < !C(K(L -:;.;Lo,,/j ,,,llc (<,,,,Jo L 1,1,,0 ^
, ( . {" r r ' " ,
r, V1. < II"" ~: < '.I ",,' ". {"I {,., ~ I. f V-n'"' f ,,," /0 J- 5 a i '" (, '" J
r tC, w~; (:~ Lr'~ v r r (,,,,).. (<' .{",J f L (, I: ~<)
r ! 1/ {^i' 'f> ",// /
Vv'- J-e \/ .!> to L<J<!. l{~<.., ~., f "-" (" y'
~ ,..../ ,/
",,,. ..~.~_~........u_
-
STAFF COMMENTS
MELEAR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
Planning Department
See attached memo
DRAINAGE STATEMENT
FOR
MELEAR PUD
This office has been retained to prepare a Drainage
Statement to address the drainage implications of the proposed
revisions to the Master Plan of the Melear PUD.
The essence of the proposed changes to the Master Plan is
the changing of the housing types in Phases II, III & IV. It
is proposed to construct 181 single family and 492 apartment
units instead of the 77 single family, 273 quadraplex and 323
condominium units previously planned.
According to the Master
Studio, the development area
stay substantially the same.
the overall drainage design
Plan prepared by Urban Design
along with the lake area will
Thus, no substantial changes in
will be necessary to accommodate
these proposed Master Plan changes.
This site is in the Lake Worth Drainage District and
drainage discharge is regulated by that agency. The South
Florida Water Management District also has permitting
authority for this site. Permits for this project have been
issued by both of these agencies. These permits will have to
be modified to accommodate the development of the remainder of
this project.
Prepared By:
~~:.E.
Fla. Reg. No. 24068
September 26, 1988
K.S. ROGERS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC.
1495 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite F
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
(407) 964-7300
UTILITY STATEMENT
FOR
MELEAR PUD
This office has been retained to prepare a Utility
Statement to address the implications on the City's water and
sewer system which are expected as a result of the proposed
revisions to the Master Plan of the Melear PUD.
The essence of the proposed changes to the Master Plan is
the changing of the housing types in Phases II, III & IV. It
is proposed to construct 181 single family and 492 apartment
units instead of the 77 single family, 273 quadraplex and 323
condominium units previously planned. The net effect is that
there will be 104 more single family homes and 104 fewer
multi-family units as a result of the proposed Master Plan.
The number of utility equivalent dwelling units for the
portion of the Master Plan which is being revised can be
calculated as follows:
Apartments:
197 1 bedroom x 0.8 EDU = 157.6
246 2 bedroom x 1.2 EDU = 295.2
49 3 bedroom x 1.6 EDU = 78.4
Single-Family
188 3 bedroom x 1.8 EDU = 338.4
TOTAL 869.6 EDU
Adequate water and sewer lines have already been brought
to this project. There is a 10 inch water main in Sandalwood
Drive. A lift station and force main capable of servicing
this project also have been installed. Some adjustment8 to
the lift station pumps may be required for the final phase
depending upon actual flow rates and pump capacity at that
point in time. This will be addressed with the Uti11ty
Department at such time that the construction plans for the
final phase are submitted.
Prepared By:
~
K. S. R BRS, P.E.
Fla. Reg. No. 24068
September 26, 1988
K.S. ROGERS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC.
1495 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite F
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
(407) 964-7300
-2-
,
'\
1, ilt.
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
MELEAR PUD
CONGRESS AVENUE & MINER ROAD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
SEPTEMBER 26, 1988
".
'-,
/Yf'( 1--1 hie
Prepared By:
~. s. R0GERS, CCNSUL,TING ENGINEER, INC.
1495 Forest Hill Boulevard
Suice E', Centre Place Professlcnal Park
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
407-964-7300
~~~
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1
LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 2
EXISTING ROADWAY
CONDITIONS
FIGURE 3
DISTRIBUTED
TRAFFIC
FIGURE 4
A.M. PEAK HOUR
VOLUMES
FIGURE 5
P.M. PEAK HOUR
VOLUMES
INTRODUCTION
This office has been retained to prepare a Traffic Impact
Analysis for the proposed revision to the Master Plan for the
Melear PUD. This 154.6 acre parcel is located on the west
side of Congress Avenue and the south side of Miner Road, in
the City of Boynton Beach, Florida. This project originally
received approval from the City in 1983. Of the original five
phases, only the first phase, the Sandalwood Development, has
been constructed.
This Analysis has been performed in order to determine
the volume of traffic expected to be generated by this project
at such time that this project is completely constructed and
completely occupied, the effect that the generated traffic
will have on the area's roadways and to make recommendations
on what roadway improvements, if any, are necessary as a
result of the approval of this project. In conformance with
the City Planning Department's policy this Analysis has been
performed with the criteria established in the City's Zoning
Sode and the recently adopted Palm Beach County Traffic
Performance Standards Ordinance #87-18.
Existing traffic counts which were available from the
Metropolitan Planning Organization and the Palm Beach County
Traffic Division were used, when applicable, and these counts
were augmented by twenty-four (24) hour machine counts and
peak hour hand counts performed by this office.
SITE INFORMATION
As shown in Figure 1, this parcel is located on the
southwest corner of Congress Avenue and Miner Road. All
ac~ess to the development parcel will be onto Sandalwood Drive
" . ----,,--,_.---"~-- -.--~--~
which traverses through the project from Congress Avenue to
Miner Road.
w SIH
>
c (
C C Q C
C C C >
0 0 0 ...
'" '" '" ..
--.... ./ 3^V 0, --., SS311~NO:>
,
"', ,
"', ,
"" ,_J
!I ,
:I L j
"
C
N Z
N
UJ 0
I- :t ... :I:
1ii z (J
z >- c
0 w
.. ..
aVail 3:>"311N1V1
c 0
)( z
z ~ 0
c ... ...
... 0 z
z ... 0 >-
c >- .... 0
... :I: 0 lD
11VII.L AIIY.1I1."
~
.
f,
~ S rogers. consult,ng
engineer, inc.
west palm beach, fl
LOCATION MAP
dale
SEPT 88
figure
1
The revisions to the new Master Plan center around a
change in the housing type of the unbuilt units. The number
of single family units and rental apartments increased while
the townhouse units decreased and the multi-family
condominiums have been deleted entirely. The new Master Plan
has maintained the 3.1 acre commercial site. A breakdown of
the residential land uses for the proposed and the old Master
Plans are:
PROPOSED
MASTER PLAN
LAND USE
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
MASTER PLAN
181
332
Single Family
Quads I Townhouse
Condominium
Apartment
TOTAL
77
417
323
188
1005
492
1005
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS
Congress Avenue, adjacent to this site, is a four lane
divided roadway. Miner Road was constructed from Congress
Avenue to Sandalwood Drive in order to provide access to this
site. Miner Road is scheduled to be extended westerly to
Lawrence Road. However, for the purposes of this Analysis the
extension to Lawrence Road shall not be considered to be
constructed.
Figure 2 shows
Level of Service "CO
the existing volumes,
and the existing vlc
the capacity at
ratio for these
roadway segments as they presently exist.
-2-
III
>
e
Sll-l
0 0 r T ~Ig<o 0 0
e e "'0- "'0- e >
0 0 ""0<0 ..,.0<0 ..,.0<0 0 -'
= = '"'foci '<tod tDoQ = ..
"'''' "'''' "''''
3^Y or - SS !>NO:l
='
..,.\8",=,
0) ....OWI
"~ci! I ,
::E -~ 010<0
00
C").....~
...."'0
-
...
c
.. Z
..
UJ 0
I- ~ ... :z:
ii5 z 0
Z ,.. e
0 III
.. CD
aYOll 3:lN311N1Y'
e
z
..
...
z
..
-'
~
~ :; rogers, consulting
'::n\Jlneer, Inc.
wP" f'alm beach, fI
~
r
"'18 <0
"'0_
""0 '
"'",0
o
)(
:>
-'
o
...
,..
:z:
'IYlI.l
AlIY.l."..
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS
o
-'
o
z
o
...
z
,..
o
CD
)-
t:
o Q
0<< ...
-a. <<
"-<< a:
~<.) <.)
~o.>
-'0
CJO.o
c z ~ COZ
-en 0-
Z t:W-J!':
UJ '" a: '"
" X~ I-X
W WI-.c:(W
...J
"'10
",0
..,.0
..,.0
"''''
~
o
dote
SEPT 88
hgure
2
GENERATION
The generation rates used in this Report were obtained
from "Trip Generation Fourth Edition", Institute of
Transportation Engineers, 1987, "1981 Update Study of
Vehicular Traffic Generation Characteristics Within Palm Beach
County", prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates and the
traffic study submitted in 1983 with the original Rezoning
Petition, "Traffic Impact Analysis for a Portion of Section
18-45-43"; prepared by William F. Mulhearn, P.E., January 27,
1983. The generation (driveway volume) calculated for this
project is based as follows:
NO. OF GENERATION
LAND USE UNITS RATE TRIPS
Single family 181 10 tpd/unit 1810
Quad-plex 332 7 tpd/unit 2324
Apartment 492 7.5 tpd/unit 3690
Commercial 30,000 s. f. 100 tpd/lOOO s.f. 2250 *
TOTAL 10,074
* The same 25% internal factor which was used in
the Mulhearn Report was utilized in this Report.
Applying the same generation rates to the land uses to
that of the previously approved Master Plan, the generation
can be calculated as follows:
NO. OF GENERATION
LAND USE UNITS RATE TRIPS
Single family 77 10 tpd/unit 770
Townhouse 417 7 tpd/unit 2919
Condominium 322 7 tpd/unit 2254
Apartment 188 7.5 tpd/unit 1410
Commercial 30,000 s.f. 100 tpd/lOOO s.f. 2250
TOTAL 9603
-3-
Comparing the volume expected from the proposed Master
Plan with that which was previously approved, it is calculated
that the revised Master Plan is expected to generate an
average of 471 trips per day more than the volume previously
approved.
According to Article IV, Section 2 (b), only the traffic
generated by a proposed project which is in excess of the
volume previously approved shall be subject to provisions of
the Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. Thus, this
Report shall address the impact of the additional 471 trips.
TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION
The traffic distribution for this project was prepared
according to the distribution analysis which was previously
prepared by this office in the report "Traffic Distribution
Study for Melear PUD", April, 1987. Based upon the
proceeding, the traffic distribution for this project was
determined and is shown below:
NORTH
EAST
SOUTH
WEST
38.1%
17.3%
31.4%
13.2%
The distributed traffic is shown in Figure 3.
EFFECT ON ROADWAY CAPACITY
The Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance defines a
project with an "Insignificant Impact" as a project which
generates less than 1% of the capacity of the roadway upon
which it directly accesses.
-4-
The distributed volumes for this project and the 1%
threshold volumes are shown in Figure 3. A review of these
volumes show that this project will not generate more than 1%
of the capacity of any of the roadway links directly accessed
by this project. This project, therefore, is defined as an
"Insignificant Project". An "Insignificant Project" can be
approved if the following two conditions are met:
a. the volume to capacity ratio (V/C) on the
direc~ly accessed links does not exceed 1.5.
b. a fee, in addition to the Fair Share Contribution
for Road Improvements Fee, is paid in accordance
with Table 3 - "Insignificant Project Fee", as
presented in the Traffic Performance Standards
Ordinance.
The existing v/c ,atios are shown in Figure 2. The v/C
ratio for Congress Avenue is 0.81 and the v/C ratio for Miner
Road is 0.06 on those links adjacent to the site. As the v/c
ratio does not exceed 1.0 on any directly accessed roadway
link, an Insignificant Project Fee will not be required.
PEAK HOUR
The peak hour volumes have been calculated in order to
ascertain if any additional roadway improvements are necessary
to accommodate the additional traffic expected to be generated
by this project. For this Report, both the A.M. and P.M. peak
hour vol~mes were calculated and analyzed. The peak hour
volumes were calculated as follows:
A.M.
P.M.
7.54% of ADT
10% of ADT
; 0.075(471) =
= 0.10(471)
36
= 47
IN
IT
28
OUT
25
19
-5-
w Sll-I
>
.. I
0 0 0 0
.. .. * * * .. >
0 0 00 ",0 ~o 0 ...
a: a: ~o "'0 "'0 a: al
"'''' ~'" "''''
......... ./ 3AY * =~' '] SS3110NO:>
~;;;a:~_ :
~ ~w+-- J
z "
_, I
:'1 J
...
c:
N Z
N
W 0
I- ~ I- :r
Z (J
Cii z .. ..
0 W
al al
aVail 3:>N311N1Y'
.. 0
z >< z
.. '" 0
... l-
I- 0
Z Z
lL 0 ..
.. .. ... 0
... :r
0 al
"YII.I. AIIY.l.I1I"
l-
t)
<I-
wQ.t)
::<::<<
~
.
J
o::)-a.
- _H-::!:
ttoz-
C(><~
C::oUZ
~...Ju:<
C -t)
z.....ozu:
UI~~~z
O-,w(l')CJ
UJOa:a:(j)
...J a::z: 0 z
D..I-IJ.._
~o
",0 *
"''''
k, s ro?!"rs, consulting
1-?nglnC0r, Inc.
west r<Jim hPCJch, fI
DISTRIBUTED TRAFFIC
elate
SEPT 88
f;gure
3
These peak hour volumes were assigned to the project's
driveways and are shown in Figures 4 and 5. In order to show
the complete impact, the previous volumes, as presented in the
Mulhearn Report, were added to these volumes.
A capacity analysis was prepared for the intersections
shown in Figures 4 and 5. These analyses concluded that the
roadway improvements which were recommended in the Mulhearn
Report, a left turn lane and right turn lane on Congress C
Avenue at the intersection with Sandalwood Drive and the J'
signalization of the same intersection, are adequate to
accoffioodate the additional traffic expected to be generated by
this request. Thus, no additional roadway improvements are
required as a result of the additional traffic generated by
this revised Master Plan.
CONCLUSION
The proposed revisions to the Master Plan of the Melear
PUD are expected to generate an average of 461 additional
trips per day. It is concluded, even with the number of
additional trips, that this revision to the Master Plan
creates an "Insignificant Impact" on the major roadway system.
A review of the peak hour volumes further concludes that no
additional roadway improvp.ments are necessary as a result of
this proposed Mater Plan revision.
Therefore, it is the
this proposed Master Plan
approved as requested.
conclusion of this Analysis that
revision to the Melear PUD can be
-6-
11
.
,
<n
<nO
oli
c<
-'
3A"
~ ~
-~...
0"'",
::; ~ ~ '-- (es )0
00 0 -(~9S)0
) I ,...- (L6 )9
(~~ I )0 --' '\ I (
(9fH~}O - ___
(6(a )l -.. ~ 0 ~
"'_'"
~O~
-
r
I
01
~I
a:,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
1 I
I r-------------~
I I
, I
~ L___-I
Z
::;
W
l-
CE
,
<DI
;;;1
" '--(SLl)6
k s rogers, consulting
'?n9nper. inc
west pdm beach, fI
AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
SS3/;J!:)NO:)
W
::;;
::>w
...J::;;
0::>
>...J
0,...0
0>
ZW...J
W..,""
00,...
W a: 0
-'0->-
"'<D
...
~
dote
SEPT 88
figure
4
71- , ,
lf)
lf) 0
0 (!l
0 a:
<(
..J
~ ~
~~....
~oco '- (CB )0
~~~
000 -, (lS~ ~)O
3^V ) I " ~ (66~ )9~ SS3l;l~NO:J
I (vl ~)O --' ~ I f I
I
01 (9BLH - ~@(\j I
(BSl)S -.... .... '"
~I ~~~ I
':;tOe
a: ~ I
I
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
I w I
l-
I C;; I
~I I
~I I
I
\.. '-(CO~)9 I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I-------------~
I I
I
a: L___..J
0
~
::.
w
::!
:>w
...J::!
0:>
0> ...J
Z I- 0
W () >
(!l W...J
W -'<(
..J 0 I-
0:0
0.1-
~
....~
'"
~
~
r
k s, rogers, consulting date
eng'niOpr, In( PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES SEPT 88
" , ~,I ,_~, b'-.!Jch, II hgure
. . ~.~, ~-,;",
5
"
frJ
'I' ,':;:, ~
"
.;.9,
"I~."
,..',' ,"
., "
,;j"
I
~'
.y,
-.. .-
'7
"~.,
.,', '0':
'., -. ~
:'. ~
~'"
/
.,.(.
"....~~":~
..-.
,."
;\.'
:.'.
\
\,
;~
),
.';
:~"
"
PR~D
J+rrvJ
\.W.D:I,L-IOOtll&l
~ 1IfUf'---
-
,
,.. "",. L"d ;:"..Ilo<t I
u".
I
'"
Min., ROld
..
Phase 3
I"t" 'Iml,
.11'",",'1
II.'"
~_..
T..MOll."
IUlrft.
If.....
Ltt "'1"
i
I
,l."'~,..........t..
.'.........-.......1'''--
---
1..'"..............
!
I :
I j
I
"
1 I, I
"
I
Phase 2
awl taml,
""CIrl/I.
...,..
.....,...,..
--
...laM!'
.~,
L.W.D.D.\..lto.....
, '
~
P:U,D. ZONING U;U.I, 4:00)
t..u..............
t............ IN.......'......,,...
.. ~...u.....llltu.
'''U,I'''''. ......"U,".....II......oI
.....I."......w... .
......'.....111....... .....,...................
.. w,...,."u."'...
..............1"...... t....................
I, ..,..""..,........"...
I .II,H...'.'.,...., 11.............!.,...,
.. ..1Il.....n....,...."..
..""
"
.~...t\QIl..rll!i.~ ...
'1N1"l1tUW'QOQf(
.:....~I~
~..".
.....,."../1
"
'.....,.IIlUI..............,..IIIU,.".......,..."t...,..
. ~.. .. .... ~,',J'JJ..\ :.......... ~,,~.._ r.. ~..,....~...'':.'''.' .1'40 . .':""r. ,..4.....';....::<<lr......_ _.:-. .r.. ...~\..... ""'... ..,t'~"".1.,:..i:t )f.'t;'t\'<Of,t..:,t..; .....~~~~~ :,- ,.... ... "~I
filii ;Melear ;P'U 0
.""'\.~
.c.'~:'_. J ~~. '-..:-~......'_~.:.t.....:~~~.~. ._;::.:~..:~:~::~;~~:-.'~:.~"':i.'~ IIL....q~.:.~.~_~_~ ~ .....
I ~
.'
~ .i! ':"..#0.;....
~ f-:1)'
r-l",]I
, -~:: - 'll,' .'~' "
" jr' - ~ 11 '/ '
" I, ' I,. ~ '
.r If _,. " '};,.- .
lj {l;....:.- .-!)
^-.
li.;
:: A ". A.
L.,w
~:_-. . --:-.~--:',
\ "\
''':.:--",.
.
'.
o
'\
1/8
I
_ _ _ _ -.- .-. '...- _ -- ---- -..
.
LOCA TION
. ": 'MELEAFf
.. ~-__.:.\ 1". fI>.~"
, MAP"
'PUO'.I
.. .., ~--:- ,r" ~:': .:.-~
I ,.--nSCiy'NTON, - ,
LAKES". .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r3
PID\\
- \\
\ I
PUD
LUI:5.0
5...lNI)
I
I
I
I
f
I.
I
L..._._...u___
N
4VD
,
CONGRESS
LAKES"
\ \
\
,
. ,
\
I
.~;'I ...1
~
IJ
LH
1-
,
.1
~I
!.
PIC
[ MOTO,"OLAl/J
. ,
. "
" ,
. '
..... -" . ..- .
.'- - .~-:=:; ~~ -: .
..,.. ...-. c."
1/4
I
1/2
3/4 MILES
I
C1
:~oo '808 1 ROO
2400 3200 4000. FE~T
.________~+~______ .__.._~_~.__~~Jj<}~~I"';,1.'d_j7~!nt. _