REVIEW COMMENTS
0....
. .....
!O f'
~ rn~rnDwm 00
SEP 1-
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPI
FIRE & LIFE SAFETY DIVISION
Memorandum No. 98-330
NFPA Life Safety Code 101, National Fire Code 1, all applicable National Fire
Protection Association codes, and the City Fire code shall be adhered to.
TO: Mike Rumpf, Act. Director
Planning & Zoning Division ..
FROM: Steve Gale, Fire Marshal /.A'~
Deputy Chief - Fire Rescue~~;~:rf~;?rlt
DATE: September 1, 1998
SUBJECT: Melear PUD
Corner of Miner Rd. and Sandalwood Dr.
NWSP 98-011
Fire hydrants shall be no more than 300 feet apart along the roadway. The
remotest part of any structure shall be no more than 200 feet from a hydrant,
LOR Section 16.
CC: File
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #98-251
TO:
Mike Rumpf, Acting Planning & Zoning Director ~
lo)~ml~~W~~
l11J SEP 3 1998' [~
FROM:
Larry Quinn, Assistant Public Works Director I
J
SUBJ:
Site Plan Review - 151 Review - Melear PUD
PLA;~~'J!ii~ M~D
ZONING DEPI
DATE:
September 3, 1998
The Public Works Department has no comments in reference to the above mentioned Site
Plan review and the plans should move forward for approval.
LQ/cr
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mike Rumpf, Acting Director of Planning and Zoning
Kevin John Hallahan, ForesterlEnvironmentalist fZ & ~
Melear PUD
New Site Plan
FROM:
Re:
DATE:
September 10, \998
\. The applicant will have to complete the landscape and irrigation improvements to the
Congress A venue medians abutting the site.
2. The applicant will have to install littoral and upland hardwood plantings around 50% of the
lake perimeters on phases 2,3A, 3B, and 3C (4 lakes total). A management plan must be
submitted for the proper maintenance of the lake plantings. This management plan must be
included in the homeowner association documents.
\ have no comment on the above new site plan. The project should continue in the normal
revIew process.
Kjh
File
ffi
rn lt3 ~ G W ~ !~\1
SEP I 0 1998 .-J ,
....i
PLi\l{;',;\~;G I\ND
ZONiNG DEPT.
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 98 - 262
m~Uuum
SEP , 8 I9ll8 ~
, ~' PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
TO:
Mike Rumpf, Acting Planning Director
FROM:
John A. Guidry, Utilities Director
DATE:
September 18, 1998
SUBJECT:
Melear PUD - New Site Plan - 1" Review
We offer the following comments on this project:
GENERAL COMMENTS
1) All utilities easements shall be shown on the rectified landscaping drawings so that we may
determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree
species allowed within utilities easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so
that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future.
LDR Sec. 7.5-18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility
services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way.
2) Dept. of Health permits will be required for the water and sewer system extensions serving this
project. (Sec. 26-12)
3) Sec. 26-34(E) of the City Code requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project
either upon my request for signature on the Health Dept. application forms or within 30 days of site
plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or
expected demand.
4) Comp Plan policy 3C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may, therefore, not
be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available.
5) Provide an engineer's written certification that drainage will conform to all rules of the City and the
South Florida Water Management District. (LDR Chap. 4, sec. 7F)
SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
1) Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utilities
easements. Please show all existing or proposed easements on the engineering drawings and/or
plat, using a minimum width of 12 feet, or as required to assure appropriate separations from
buildings or other structures. (See Sec. 26-33(a) of the Code, and LDR Chap. 6, Art. IV, sec. 6)
2) LDR chap. 6, Article IV, Sec. 16 requires that the center of each lot will not be more than 300 feet
from a proposed fire hydranl, and that hydrants shall be no more than 500 feet apart. Please
demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants.
3) Water mains shall be looped as necessary to maintain acceptable water quality and chlorine
residual.
Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella (375-6404) of this office.
JAG/PVM
Xc: Skip Milor
Peter Mazzella
File
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 98 - 262
DATE:
Mike Rumpf, Acting Planning Dir~r ./
John A. Guidry, Utilities Director ~ V\
September 18, 1998
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Melear PUD - New Sile Plan - 1" Review
We offer the following comments on this project:
GENERAL COMMENTS
1) All utilities easements shall be shown on the rectified landscaping drawings so that we may
determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree
species allowed within utilities easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so
that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future.
LOR Sec. 7.5-18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility
services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way.
2) Dept. of Health permits will be required for the water and sewer system extensions serving this
project. (Sec. 26-12)
3) Sec. 26-34(E) of the City Code requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project
either upon my request for signature on the Health Dept. application forms or within 30 days of site
plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or
expected demand.
4) Comp Plan policy 3C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may, therefore, not
be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available.
5) Provide an engineer's written certification that drainage will conform to all rules of the City and the
South Florida Water Management District. (LOR Chap. 4, sec. 7F)
SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
1) Waler and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utilities
easements. Please show all existing or proposed easements on the engineering drawings and/or
plat, using a minimum width of 12 feet, or as required to assure appropriate separations from
buildings or other structures. (See Sec. 26-33(a) of the Code, and LOR Chap. 6, Art. IV, sec. 6)
2) LOR chap. 6, Article IV, Sec. 16 requires that the center of each lot will not be more than 300 feet
from a proposed fire hydrant, and that hydrants shall be no more than 500 feet apart. Please
demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants.
3) Water mains shall be looped as necessary to maintain acceptable water quality and chlorine
residual.
Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella (375-6404) of this office.
JAG/PVM
Xc: Skip Milor
Peter Mazzella
File
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. ENG 98-143
ill
.271900
rn
DATE.
Mike Rumpf; Acting Planning & Zoning Administrator
Ken Hall, Engineering Plan Check Inspector ci!!
October 22, 1998
~~j
~11. ~,.. PLANNING AND
WtI. . ZI NING DEPT
TO
FROM
RE
CHANGES TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
MELEAR P.lI.D.
Please change the subject conditions of approval to reflect the engineering comments as
follows
I'!,
MPMD 98-003. Delete all comments except items 8, 13, 14 & 15
2. NWSP 98-014: Delete items 11, 14, 15, 16 & 18 Edit item 13 by deleting the
words.... "and along Miner Road".
Include items 10, 17 & 19
Modify item 12 to read: Provide a typical view of the parking space(s) for each
phase as follows:
a. Single parking space shall be a minimum of 12' wide and 18' deep exclusive
of private right-of-way.
b. Double parking space shall be a minimum of21' wide and 18' deep exclusive
of private right-of-way
KRH/ck
('-It"'v J)ol.:lIIm::T1tsl,i\'ld~Hr PI II) Changes to Cnndilional/\pprnvals.doJ.:
Ellanson, Beverly
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Hallahan, Kevin
Thursday, October 22,19984:36 PM
Ellanson, Beverly
RE: Comments for Melear PUD
No. Thanks Kevin
----Original Message---
From: Ellanson, Beverly
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 19984:33 PM
To: Hallahan, Kevin
Subject: RE: Comments for Melear PUD
Any comments on the master plan modification and new site plan?
----Original Message---
From: Hallahan, Kevin
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 19984:23 PM
To: Ellanson, Beverly
Subject: RE: Comments for Melear PUD
I have signed off the plat. I will be at a meeting all day Friday. Thanks Kevin
--.-.Original Message---
From: Ellanson, Beverly
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 1998 3:57 PM
To: Hallahan, Kevin; Wildner, John; Riggle, Rob
Cc: Rumpf, Michael
Subject: Comments for Melear PUD
Review comments for second submittal (reviewed at last Tuesday's TRC) for Melear PUD are due to Planning
and Zoning by Friday noon.
Thanks
1
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. DD 98-354
00 rn@rnO\Vlrn 00
t<<W 13_
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
FROM
Michael Rumpf: Acting Planning and Zoning Administrator
Raymond F. Davidson, P.E., Acting City Engin~
November 12, 1998
TO
DATE
MELEAR PUD - NEW SITE PLAN (NWSP 98-014)
ENGINEERING 3RD REVIEW COMMENTS
RE
We have reviewed the subject plans and recommend that the request be forwarded for Board review
with the understanding that all remaining comments will be shown in compliance on the permit
drawings.
Enl!ineerinl! Division (Site Specific Comments)
I. The preliminary plat process may begin prior to final approval of the master plan A pre-
application meeting is recommended [LOR Chapter 5, Article IV]
2. Show all proposed off-street parking spaces and driveways including location, dimensions and
setbacks. A typical scaled view for each subdivision will be acceptable. [LDR Chapter 4,
Section 7.8.2.]
a. Single parking space shall be a minimum of 12' wide and 18' deep exclusive of private
right-of-way.
b Double parking space shall be a minimum of21' wide and 18' deep exclusive of private
right-of-way
3. Show a 5' sidewalk along the Sandalwood Drive perimeter. [LDR Chapter 6, Article IV,
Section 10 T. and Chapter 22, Article I, Section 5.]
4. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the city's code requirements at time of
application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following: site lighting, paving,
drainage, curbing, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies,
such as FDOT. PBC, SFWMD, OERM, LWDD, DEP and any others, shall be included with
your permit request.
5. Provide 50' wide minimum right-of-way for all roadways in the three phases. [LDR Chapter 6.
Article IV, Section lOB & Chapter 22, Article I, Section 2 and 3]
6 Show a twenty (20) foot maintenance access easement to all three lakes.
Recommendation
We recommend that the plat name for the three phases be the same as the larger single family
development for identification purposes and future reference.
RD/ck
Xc. Bulent Kastarlak
Ken Hall
Sebastian Puda
C:\!\Iy Dm::um<:nts\!\kkar PIlI) New Sit\: Plan Eng. Jrd Review.lill!;
... .. ---'-::::::1
:' ",I' r.;1 inl'.
I ,F I> I '
'''-'~iflll
NOV I 21998 i~l
.....J.l DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
.::.. MEMORANDI1M NO. 98-351
_.,p-"~~-"
FROM:
Michael Rumpf, Acting Planning and Zoning Administrator ~
1[.1
Michael E. Haag, Building Code Permit Administrator ~
November 12. 1998 \./
TO
DATE
RE:
MELEAR Plm - NEW SITE PLAN (NWSP 98-011)
3RIl REVIEW COMMENTS
We have reviewed the subject plans and offer the following comments that should be addressed
prior to the project being forwarded for Board review:
Buildinl!: Division (Site Specific Comments
1. Provide an enlarged plan view drawing of the area around the proposed wall signs.
Dimension on the drawing the distance the signs are located from the abutting rights-of-
way and the perimeter of the buffer area (Note There is a ten- (10) foot minimum
setback required from property lines to the leading edge of the sign/wall). On the new
plan view drawing of the wall dimension the length and depth of the wall and show the
location and length of the sign.
2. Add to the elevation view drawing of the wall, the total sign area including dimensioning
the length and height of the sign area. Note: maximum sign area allowed for each wall
sign is 32 square feet and the height of the wall shall not exceed six (6) feet.
3. Indicate whether the signs will be illuminated and specify type and location of
illumination.
MEH/ck
Xc' Bulent Kastarlak
Don Johnson
C",t<.fv ])l)('U11l~1I1s',i\,ld~ar PI II) New Sit<.: Plan \rd rcvlcw.dne
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. DD 98-292
ill
@~uw~
_It-
00
"','
DATE
Michael Rumpf Acting Planning and Zoning Administrato~
Michael E. Haag, Building Code Permit Administratar4S'''
Raymond F Davidson, P.E, City Engi~ D
September 9, 1998
TO
FROM.
RE.
MELEAR PUD - NEW SITE PLAN (NWSP 98-011)
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
We have reviewed the subject plans and offer the following comments that shall be addressed prior to
the project being forwarded for Board review
Buildinl! Division (Site Specific Comments) - Michael E. Haag (561) 742-6350
I. A statement within the site data found on sheet I of I indicates that the type of ownership for all
units as fee simple Therefore amend the plans to include within the Site Area Breakdown for
Phase 3A, Phase 3B and Phase 3C a category-titled Building and Site Regulations (Chapter 2.5,
Planned Unit Developments, Section I) Each phase shall have a response for the following
10pics:
a. Minimum lot area
b A verage lot area
c. Minimum lot frontage
d. Minimum front yard building setback
e. Minimum rear yard building setback
f Minimum side yard building setback
g. Minimum opposite side yard building setback
h. Minimum corner lot street side building side setback
I. Minimum living area
1 Maximum living area (Note to applicant, the maximum living area shall comply with the
L. U 1. regulations with respect to floor area ratio)
k. Maximum lot coverage
I. Maximum structure height
m. Number of otl~street parking spaces provided per unit
n. Width and location oflandscape buffer
o. Minimum front yard screen roof enclosure setback
p. Minimum rear yard screen roof enclosure setback
q. Minimum side yard screen roof enclosure setback
r Minimum opposite side yard screen roof enclosure setback
s. Minimum corner lot street side screen roof enclosure side setback
t. Minimum front yard pool and spa setback
u. Minimum rear yard pool and spa setback
v. Minimum side yard pool and spa setback
w. Minimum opposite side yard pool and spa setback
Department of Development Memorandum No. DD 98-292
Re: Melear PUD- New Site Plan 1 ,t Review Comments
September 9, 1998
Page #2
X. Minimum corner lot street side pool and spa side setback
y. Setbacks for other structures such as, trellis, storage sheds, barbecue grills, etc (It is
recommended that the zoning code regulations apply for the other structure setbacks.
Therefore the chart should state other structure setbacks shall comply with the regulations
stated in the City Zoning Code)
2. Add a labeled symbol to the plan that indicates the front of all corner lots.
3. Place a note on the plan indicating that there shall be no building or any kind of construction
placed on any easement without prior written consent of all easement beneficiaries and all
applicable city regulations have been complied with.
4. Provide an enlarged plan view drawing of the area around the proposed wall signs. Dimension
on the drawing the location of the signs with respect to the rights-of-ways and the perimeter of
the buffer area (Note. 10 foot minimum setback from property lines). Dimension the length
and depth of the wall and show the location and length of the sign. Add to the elevation view',
drawing of the wall sign the color name and color code of the colors proposed for the wall.
Also identify the type of signage, letter style and total sign area including dimensioning the
length and height of the sign. Indicate whether the signs will be illuminated and specify type of
illumination. Identify the color name and color code for the colors proposed for the signage
5. Provide a copy of the South Florida Water Management District permit that verifies the
proposed finish floor elevation is in compliance with the minimum standards. Clarify the
inconsistency between the master plan and engineering plan with respect to minimum finish
floor elevation, minimum crown of road and the control elevation for the lake.
6 Place a note on the plan indicating that the zero lot line lots have a 4 foot wide drainage,
maintenance and roof overhang easement located along the entire length of the zero setback side
of the lot
7. Identify on the plan the portion of the total PUD floor area ratio that is allowed for Phase III A,
Band C. The total floor area ratio that is allowed for Phase III shall take in account that floor
area ratio that has been used by Phase II and I.
Enl!ineerinl!: Division (Site Specific Comments) - Sebastian Puda & Ken Hall 561-742-6280
The following comments are based on a preliminary review of the plans as submitted for a site plan
review. It should be noted that during review of the master plan modification submittal for this project
we have indicated that platting is required per Chapter 5 of the City's Land Development Regulations.
Therefore further review and engineering comments will be provided at the time of submittal of
required improvement plans associated with the plat
Department of Development Memorandum No. DD 98-292
Re: Melear PUD New Site Plan I" Review Comments
September 9, 1998
Page #3
I. The preliminary plat process may begin prior to final approval of the master plan. A pre-
application meeting is recommended [LDR Chapter 5, Article IV]
2. Provide an engineer's certification that the drainage will conform with all rules, regulations and
codes of the LDR Chapter 4, Section 7.F
3. Show all proposed ofT-street parking spaces and driveways including location, dimensions and
setbacks. A typical scaled view for each subdivision will be acceptable. [LDR Chapter 4,
Section 7.8.2.]
4. Show a 5' sidewalk along the Sandalwood Drive perimeter and along Miner Road. [LDR
Chapter 6, Article IV, Section IO.T and Chapter 22, Article I, Section 5 ]
5. Show all proposed traffic control marking and signage. [LDR Chapter 4, Section 7.B.2.]
6. If dumpsters are to be used in the Townhouse subdivision, show the proposed locations. [LDR
Chapter 4, Section 7.B 5.]
7. Show the proposed locations for on-site lighting. [LDR Chapter 4, Section 7.B.4 ]
8. Dead-end streets shall not exceed 1,320 ft in length. [LDR Chapter 6. Article IV. Section 10.D.]
9. Consider a privacy wall along Miner Road for security and reduced traffic noise.
10. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the city's code requirements at time of
application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following: site lighting, paving,
drainage, curbing, landscaping and irrigation Permits required trom other permitting agencies,
such as FDOT, PBC, SFWMD, DERM, LWDD, DEP and any others, shall be included with
your permit request.
MH/SP/KH.ck
Xc. Bulent Kastarlak
Don Johnson
Sebastian Puda
Ken Hall
C:',T\.'ly Doculllenlsl/\'ldcar PI1D, NWSP 9R-1I1 L Nc\\' Sile Plan L~t UC\'lcw,dm.:
!JcPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 98-254
TO:
TRC MEMBERS
Bulent Kastarlak, Development Department
Steve Gale, Fire Marshal
Ken Hall, Engineering Division
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Mike Haag, Building Division
Pete Mazzella, Utilities Department
Ofc. Robert Riggle, Police Department
Larry Roberts, Public Works Director/City Engineer
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Ray Davidson, Engineering Division
FROM:
I'l~;?-
Michael W. Rumpf, Chairman
Acting Director of Planning & Zoning
DATE:
August 26, 1998
RE:
SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES
1 ST Review - New Site Plan
Project - Melear PUD
Location - Southwest corner of Miner Road and Sandalwood Drive
Agent - Julian Bryan
Julian Bryan and Associates, Inc.
File No. - NWSP 98-011
Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Please
review the plans and exhibits and transmit formal written comments to me no later than
5:00 P.M. on September 11.1998. When preparing your comments, please separate them
into two categories; code deficiencies with code sections referenced and
recommendations that you believe will enhance the project.
Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable
the applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval:
1. Use the review standards specified in Part IV, Land Development Regulations, Site Plan
Review and the applicable code sections of the Code of Ordinances to review and
formulate comments.
2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete,
however, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to
properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the
documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be
Page 2
Melear PUD
TO: TRC Members
RE: Planning and Zoning Memo PZ 98-254
requested by the reviewer by contacting Scott Barber.
3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the
documents.
4. Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the plans
depict or when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements
may conflict with other departmental improvements.
5. When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review
responsibility, the comment and the specific code section may be included in their review
comments with the name of the DepartmenUDivision responsible for the review specified.
6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memorandum, within
the time frame stated above, to me. The memorandum shall state that the plans are
approved and that they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and
that they recommend the project be forwarded through the approval process.
All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted to me for distribution to the applicant.
Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memorandum. Scott Barber
will be the Planning and Zoning staff member coordinating the review of the project.
Planning and Zoning staff will send the applicant a cover letter which includes the comment(s)
and directions to amend the plans to comply with the comments and the procedures for
resubmission. When Planning and Zoning staff receives the amended plans, we will distribute
the plans with a cover memorandum to all TRC Members for review and approval.
MWR:bme
Attachment
XC: Bulent Kastarlak, Director of Development
William Bingham, Fire Chief
Marshall Gage, Police Chief
John Guidry, Utilities Director
Don Johnson, Building Division
Sebastian Puda, Engineering Inspector II
Bob Donovan
Central File
s:\Projects\Melear PUD\NWSP\1 streview-plans