Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS OEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENl MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 99-129 TO: TRC MEMBERS Bob Borden, Assistant Fire Marshal Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Sgt. Eric Jensen, Police Department Pete Mazzella, Utilities Department Michael Haag, Building Division Ken Hall, Engineering Division AI Kim, Public Works Department John Wildner, Parks Division Ray Davidson, Acting City Engineer FROM: ;o/?lL Michael W Rumpf Director of Planning and Zoning DATE: May 12, 1999 RE: SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES 1 ST Review - New Site Plan Project - Dr. Verma Office Bldg. Location - 2620 Seacrest Blvd. Agent Jack Hawk - Hawk, Fulwider & Associates File No. NWSP 99-010 Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Please review the plans and exhibits and transmit formal written comments or e-mail to JoAnn Alea and I no later than 5:00 P.M. on Mav 25, 1999, When preparing your comments, please separate them into two categories; code deficiencies with code sections referenced and recommendations that you believe will enhance the project. Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval: 1. Use the review standards specified in Part IV, Land Development Regulations, Site Plan Review and the applicable code sections of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments. 2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete with the exception of traffic data, however, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the reviewer by contacting Scott Barber, or myself. 3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the documents. Page 2 4. Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with other departmental improvements. 5. When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review specified. 6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memorandum, within the time frame stated above, to me. The memorandum shall state that the plans are approved and that they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and that they recommend the project be forwarded through the approval process. All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted or e-mailed to JoAnn Alea and I for distribution to the applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memorandum or e- mail. Scott Barber will be the Planning and Zoning staff member coordinating the review of the project. First review comments will be transmitted to the applicant along with a list of Technical Review Committee (TRC) members. MWR:jma Attachment XC: William Bingham, Fire Chief Marshall Gage, Police Chief John Guidry, Utilities Director Don Johnson, Building Division Larry Roberts, Public Works Director Central File J:\SHRDATA\PLANNING\SHARED\V\>P\PROJECTS\QUANTUM\QUANTUM PARK LOT 3\1 STREVIEW-PLANS.DOC uE\,,;;LOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 99-174 SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION July 13, 1999 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Project Name: Stanton Magnetics, LLC Property Owner: Stanton Magnetics, LLC Applicant/Agent: Michael E. Sipula, JMS Design, Inc. Location: File No.: Land Use/Zoning: Type of Use: Square Footage: Surrounding uses: Existing Site: Proposal: Use classification: Concurrency: a. Traffic b, Drainage: Driveways: Quantum Park PID - Lot 6 (see Exhibit "A" - Location Map) NWSP 99-011 Industrial (I) / Planned Industrial Development, (PID) Light manufacturing (phonograph needles) and office Site Area: 97,221.82 sq. ft. (2.232 acre); Building Area: 33,088 sq. ft. North - Quantum Park Lot 7,vacant, zoned PID. South - United Way office (Lot 5), zoned PID East - Water Management Area, tract "I", zoned PID West - Quantum Boulevard right-of-way The subject property incorporates two lots, 6 and 6A . Lot 6 is vacant and consists of 2.232 acres. Lot 6A is solely a drainage easement being also a part of the lake (Water Management Area Tract "I"). The existing vegetation on the site includes trees, grasses and shrubs along the west side of lot 6A. To construct a 33,088 square foot, one story manufacturing/office building and related parking (see Exhibit "B" - proposed site plan). Staff has determined that the proposed use - manufacturing of phonograph needles - is classified as manufacturing of electronic components and accessories under the Standard Industrial Classification Code of 3679. As such, this use is consistent with the "Electronics Manufacturing" category indicated in the current list of approval uses for the PID. A traffic statement for the project has been submitted. The project has been determined to meet the county's traffic performance standards given the remaining surplus of vested trips permitted in the Quantum Park PID. Conceptual drainage information was provided for the city's review. The Engineering Division recommends that the review of specific drainage solutions be deferred to time of permit review, when complete engineering documentation is required. Proposed on-site traffic circulation consists of a 27 foot wide drive aisle with one access point to Quantum Boulevard. The proposed vehicular use area will provide parking areas containing the required 9 foot by 18 foot spaces. / Memorandum #99 -174 Stanton Magnetics, LLC Parking Facility: Landscaping: Other Regulations: Page 2 There are 100 parking spaces proposed, including four (4) spaces designated as handicapped accessible. Regulations for the Planned Industrial Development zoning district allow parking requirements to be based on number of employees. Given 90 maximum shift employees (with one and one-half parking spaces per 2 employees), the minimum requirement is 68 spaces. Thus, the parking plan meets the city's Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2 - Zoning and ADA requirements for this use, and provides for 32 surplus spaces. When the conventional methology is applied, the total parking requirement is a sum of the requirement for industrial/warehouse use (one parking space per two employees, but not less than one space per 500 square feet) and office use (one space per 300 square feet). These calculations result in the requirement of 74 parking spaces and thus the surplus of 26. The landscaping of the site will fully meet the code requirements when staff comments are incorporated. Four of the existing 11 Pink Tabebuia trees and two of the unidentified existing species along the Quantum Boulevard right-of-way (outside of the property line) will be relocated to the site. The Quantum Park Architectural Review Committee will need to review all proposed landscape plans for compliance with their requirements, which may exceed city standards. Building and site regulations will fully meet code requirements when staff comments are incorporated into the permit drawings. The Quantum Park Architectural Review Committee will review the site plan for compliance with its guidelines. Community Design: The proposed manufacturing/ office facility building located on Quantum Boulevard is consistent with the characteristic of the surrounding, predominately industrial use area. The proposed building is constructed with tilt wall panels at 25 feet in height. The building includes positive fayade features such as enhanced entries and diamond-shaped features along the facade. There are no established architectural styles or colors within Quantum Park. The finished colors of the wall panels are white, tan and dark tan. The project must still be approved by the Architectural Review Board for Quantum Park. Signage: The submitted site plan utilizes a building wall sign; no project site signage is proposed at this point. There are no wall sign regulations established for Quantum Park. The proposed wall sign meets the requirements of chapter 21 of the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations. If the site sign is subsequently proposed, a separate submittal to the Planning and Zoning Division for a site plan review approval will be requested. Site signs must conform with the Quantum Park Sign Program. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Division recommends approval of this site plan request, subject to the comments included in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval. The Technical Review Committee (TRC) recommends that the deficiencies identified in this exhibit be corrected on the set of plans submitted for building permit. xc: Central File \\CH\MAIN\SHRDATA\Planning\SHARED\WPIPROJECTS\QUANTUM STANTON MAGNETICS LOT6\Site plan staff report Stanton Magnetics.doc ,,,2 l.JEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENl MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 98-175 SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION July 13, 1999 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Project Name: Dr. Verma Office Building Property Owner: Anil & Sneh Verma Applicant/Agent: Ani( & Sneh Verma/Jack Hawk (Hawk, Fulwider & Associates) location: 2620 Seacrest Blvd File No.: NWSP 99-010 land Use Plan Designation: Office Commercial (OC) Zoning Designation: Office and Professional Commercial District (C-1) Type of Use: Medical Office Square Footage: Site Area: 18,533 squarefeet (0.425 acre.) Building Area: 3,515 square feet Surrounding land uses and Zoning District: (see Exhibit "A" - location map) North - S.W. 25th Avenue right-of-way South - existing Seacrest Dental and Medical Condo, zoned C-1 East lot 60, used as a parking lot for the above, zoned C-1 West Seacrest Boulevard right-of-way Existing Site Characteristics: The site is currently undeveloped. The property is fenced along the south lot line, with a 6 foot high wood fence at the south-west and a 3 / Page 2 Site Plan Review Staff Report Memorandum # 98-175 Dr. Verma Medical Building Proposed Development: Concurrency: a. Traffic- b. Drainage- Driveways: Parking Facility: landscaping: Building and Site Regulations: foot high chain link fence at the south east side. There is an overhead utility line along the south lot line, with three utility poles south of it. Existing vegetation consists of a 3 foot ficus hedge along the south property line, and 8 trees on the site. The applicant is proposing construction of a 3,515 square foot medical office building and related parking (see Exhibit "B" - proposed site plan). A traffic statement regarding the number of trips generated by the use was not submitted. The statement must be forwarded to the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for confirmation that the project complies with the county's traffic performance standards. This compliance is a condition of approval. Conceptual drainage information was provided for the city's review. The Engineering Division is recommending that the review of specific drainage solutions be deferred to time of permit review. Proposed on-site traffic circulation consists of a 27 foot wide drive aisle with access to Seacrest Boulevard. The new vehicle use area will provide a parking area containing 9 foot by 18 foot spaces. There are 20 parking spaces proposed, including one (1) space designated as handicapped. This meets the city's Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2 - Zoning and ADA requirements for this use, and provides for 2 surplus spaces. The landscaping of the site will fully meet code requirements when staff comments are incorporated, and will also include extras such as more intense tree spacing, foundation landscaping and landscaping of the building entry. Of the eight existing trees, seven will be removed and one (royal poinciana) relocated to the south-west corner of the property. Building and site regulations will fully meet code when staff comments are incorporated into the permit drawings. )" Page 3 Site Plan Review Staff Report Memorandum # 98-175 Dr. Verma Medical Building Community Design Plan: The new office building takes as its point of reference both residential and commercial structures in its surroundings. For example, its saddle roof and symmetry are adapted from the local residential buildings. Overall, the building expresses its individuality as successfully as the neighboring older structures do. Some of its significant features include a roof tower, decorative arches with columns at front fayade and entry traits of European style. The proposed project would compliment existing commercial buildings abutting the residential land neighborhood by its earth tones, tile roof, design features, and residential scale. Signage: The proposed 6 feet high, 48 square foot CBS monument sign will meet the land development regulations (Chapter 21, Article IV, Section 2, Paragraph B). The sign includes similar architectural features as shown on the building such as the precast inlay and cornice trim. The proposed location is at the corner of Seacrest Boulevard and S.E. 25th Avenue. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Division recommends approval of this site plan request, subject to the comments included in Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval. The Technical Review Committee (TRC) recommends that the deficiencies identified in this exhibit be corrected on the set of plans submitted for building permit xc: Central File J:\SHRDATA\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\DR VERMA OFFICE BLOG\Site plan staff report Verma.doc ') -) -- \ ~.. .d . , ',' """"t~ : ,1 1_ sa , i ;- " lU'''I~~ I - , / h j pUI~ I C3 ;,~.'11" --;---'f''"'d - lv3.i)/ ~!.:,;I 1 ~ ~J ~/ L., . I I I ., , / ::..~.~~: =-1 -, . ~ " I ~-- ~. -. J .' . tf'= i - : ---"r~- -- --- --~ . " JPf~ .f i'll ~ . I'!- ffi / PI ~G : / /: I I~ J / I =....A-EXHIBIT "B" . . ... ~ . ... . . . ,. t; 1 ~ '{ II j H~ f .1 t .Ib , u u u u_ - u _ uK "u_ I ,. . . ~ - ~-- - -- - - - - - - - - -- - - -:t..........-"...'lr..- - - - - - -- .. .. IN. _ -~1'.1b~- ____ _ ___ _ ____ __ _ ~_ _ _____________ . aD ~~ l~ i /UJ~ /ll1j ~ ~l fiiiiiiil ~ ~ ~ .. ~ par I IIf . $ flUiiii 1(5 g p ! l ! Il' ; ~ 1 U jf if ~1On~'{1 ~ :~ I I I.... d P 1( ~ ~ . ~'~uu, III !~~lIl(!l~of ~ ,. p .,..,. ill' 1 !'II !! I . 1 I ~U -I ! I I. " ;0 I ( I ".T' ... P~I Ii:; f J f f :;1 I lUllfl, JJ n ~ 'Irl I II i'!~ ~I :111 ~ I s 111 !!~I ----------------- - ~~ ~ :j . . ~ EXHIBIT "B" ~ ~ . ~ f!~ :111 ~ I ~ !!;~ CU~ ._________ _____ ______"u__ __ - . ----- -.-.--. ~--- ---- EXHIBIT "C" Conditions of Approval Project name: Dr. Verma Office Bldg. File number: NWSP 99-010 Reference: 2nd Review, New Site Plan. File # NWSP 99-010 with a Mav 12, 1999 Planning and Zoning Denartment date stamn marking DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS Comments: l. Construction dumpster and service shall be supplied by City. UTILITIES Comments: 2. All existing or proposed utilities easements shall be shown on the rectified landscaping drawings so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree specifies allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. LDR Sec. 7.5- 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 3. Dept. ofHRS permits may be required for the water and sewer serving this project. (Sec. 26-12) points of connection to the water and sewer systems have not been shown. 4. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1500 g.p.m. as stated in LDR chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater. (see Sec. 26-16(a)). Please submit these calculations with your HRS permit submittal. 5. Sec, 26-34(E) ofthe City Code requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon my request for signature on the Health Dept. application forms or within 30 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 6. Comp Plan policy 3C3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available. 7. Under the proposed plan, stormwater greater than the pre-treatment volume will drain into the adjacent right-of-way. To avoid additional flooding, demonstrate that all rainfall from a 3-year storm (approximately 6.5" in 24-hours) will be retained on site or directed to a positive outfall system. (LDR Chap. 6, Art. IV, Sect. 5) 7 Page 2 Dr. Verma Office Bldg. File No.: NWSP 99-010 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 8. Please show all water and sewer connections to existing or proposed utility lines. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in Sec. 26-33(a) of the Code. 9. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the certificate of occupancy. 10. LOR chap. 6, Article IV, Sec. 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. 11. Appropriate backflow preventers will be required on the domestic water service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in accordance with Sec. 26-207. 12. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this office has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to serve the project (Sec. 26-1S) FIRE Comments: 13. Provide required water distribution plan. 14. A fire flow test is required; LOR 6-16. POLICE Comments: None ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: IS. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following: site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies, such as FDOT, PBC, SFWMD, DERM, L WDD, DEP and any others, shall be included with your permit request. 'V o Page 3 Dr. Verma Office Bldg. File No.: NWSP 99-010 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 16. On the Landscape Plan identifY the clear sight triangular areas on both sides of the driveway and adjust the Landscape Plan if needed. [LDR Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.2.] Add a note to Landscape Plan that within the sight triangles, there shall be an unobstructed cross- visibility at a level between 30" and 6' above the pavement [LDR Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.] 17. Landscape areas in parking lots must be protected by wheel stops or curbs. [LDR Chapter 23, Article ILK] Provide concrete curb for areas not protected by wheel stops. 18. On the site paving and drainage plan, locate the stop bar and stop sign 4' back of sidewalk, and add 25' double yellow aisle separation stripes. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 19. IdentifY the finish floor elevation within the footprint of the building that is illustrated on the site plan (sheet A.I) and the floor plan drawing (sheet A.2). Add to the site data, found on sheet A.I, the flood zone that the building is located within including, where applicable, base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. Add specifications to the site data that will verifY that the proposed finish floor elevation is in compliance with the minimum standards of the following: a) Minimum elevation required by the flood zone. b) Minimum elevation required by the South Florida Water Management District permit for the project. c) Show and provide computations that verifY the elevation of the finish floor is six inches or more above the crown of the abutting right-of-way. 20. At time of permit review, identifY on the site plan the actual setback dimension from the leading edge of the west face of the building to the west property lines. Please note that overhang, covered walkways, canopies or awnings are considered when setbacks are identified. The building setbacks shall comply with Zoning Code regulations. 21. At time of permit submittal, provide an executed City Unity of Title form. The form shall combine all lots or parcels as one lot The processing of the form shall follow the Unity of Title procedures. 22. Show and label on the site the location and width of the building overhang. The location of the building on the site shall comply with the CJ Page 4 Dr. Verma Office Bldg. File No.: NWSP 99-010 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT applicable zoning regulations. 23. At time of permit review specify, in tabular form, on the site plan the type of construction and occupancy classification that is proposed for the building. The building area, occupancy and type of construction shall comply with the specifications identified in the Building Code. Working drawings ofthe building shall comply with the codes specified in Chapter 20 of the Land Development Regulations. 24. The permit fee, water and sewer facility fees, Fire Department, County fees and State fees will be determined at time of permit review. 25. To efficiently move from site plan approval to permit review it is recommended that that permit applicant and contractor contact a Plans Analyst in the Building Division of the Development Department to obtain a permit submittal checklist PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: None FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: 26. The applicant shows on the survey that there are 8 existing trees on the site. One tree is to remain and one tree is to be relocated along Seacrest Blvd. If the relocated tree does not survive the transplanting, the tree will be replaced during the landscaping portion of the project 27. The remainder of the 6 trees should be identified and an indication of preservation, relocation or removal/replacement PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 28. On the survey, correct tree labeling (tree incorrectly shown as Banyon on south side of building). Chapter 4, Section 7, Par. A 29. Label all existing utilities on the survey (label west side utility as water service). Chapter 4, Section 7, Par. A 30. Identify surrounding land use and zoning designations for purposes of setback verification. Chapter 4, Section 7, Par B 31. Indicate vehicular use area landscape requirements in site plan tabular data. Chapter 7.5, Article II, section 5, Par. G Ie Page 5 Dr. Verma Office Bldg. File No.: NWSP 99-010 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 32. On the landscape plan, provide a note indicating the irrigation system source. Chapter 4, Section 7, Par. C 33. On the landscape plan, COrrect note indicating type of mulch ("cypress" is repeated). 34. On the landscape plan plant list, provide calculations for the minimum 50% native tree and shrub requirement. 35. Provide a copy of a letter of release from the appropriate governing agencies regarding the utility easement on the south side of the property containing the proposed landscaping. 36. Indicate exterior colors in tabular form for all building elements on the architectural elevation plans. Chapter 4, Section 7, Par. D 37. Provide traffic control/direction arrows on all plans. Chapter 23, Art. II, Par. B 38. Provide traffic study to be reviewed by Palm Beach County for compliance with the County's traffic performance standards ordinance. 39. Add note stating that all delivery traffic can be accommodated by standard parking space. 40. Show building signage to comply with sign regulations including maximum area based on one and one half (1 1/2) square feet of area for each one foot oflinear building frontage. 41. On the site plan, dimension ten (10) foot setback from the property line to the closest surface of the sign. (Chapter 21, Article 1 I I, Section 5) ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS 42. To be determined. ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION COMMENTS 43. To be determined. l:\SHRDATA\l>LANNfNG\SHARED\WPWROJECTS\DR VERMA OFFICE BLDG\2ND REVIEW COMMENTS,DOC II MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 99 - 188 TO: Mike Rumpf, Planning Director ~ John A. Guidry, Utilities Director \' ~ June 22, 1999 FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Dr. Verma Office Building- 2"" review We offer the following comments on this project: GENERAL COMMENTS 1) All existing or proposed utilities easements shall be shown on the rectified landscaping drawings so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. LDR Sec. 7.5-18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 2) Dept. of HRS permits may be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project. (Sec. 26-12) Points of connection to the water and sewer systems have not been shown. 3) Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1500 g.p.m. as stated in LOR chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater. (see Sec. 26-16(a)). Please submit these calculations with your HRS permit submittaL 4) Sec. 26-34(E) of the City Code requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon my request for signature on the Health Dept. application forms or within 30 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 5) Comp Plan policy 3C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1) Under the proposed plan, stormwater greater than the pre-treatment volume will drain into the adjacent right-of-way. To avoid additional flooding, demonstrate that all rainfall from a 3-year storm (approximately 6.5" in 24-hours) will be retained on site or directed to a positive outfall system. (LOR Chap. 6, Art. IV, Sect. 5) 2) Please show all water and sewer connections to existing or proposed utility lines. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in Sec. 26-33(a) of the Code. 1) This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the certificate of occupancy. 2) LOR chap. 6, Article IV, Sec. 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. 3) Appropriate backflow preventers will be required on the domestic water service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in accordance with Sec. 26-207. 4) A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this office has approved the plans for the water andlor sewer improvements required to serve the project. (Sec. 26-15) JAG/PVM Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella (742-6404) of this office. w~.m.@ & t\V1 ""2~. ..., " Rf,;) ."~I Xc: Skip Milor Peter Mazzella File !JEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 99-129 ;:ZtLv~ /' /;~kH.4lt\ ~. , ../ mr&@~U\\j~@ MAY 14 1999 BOYNTON BEACH UTILITIES TO: TRC MEMBERS Bob Borden, Assistant Fire Marshal Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Sgt. Eric Jensen, Police Department Pete Mazzella, Utilities Department Michael Haag, Building Division Ken Hall, Engineering Division AI Kim, Public Works Department John Wildner, Parks Division Ray Davidson, Acting City Engineer FROM: ,N'?Je Michael W. Rumpf Director of Planning and Zoning DATE: May 12, 1999 RE: SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES 1 ST Review - New Site Plan Project - Dr, Verma Office Bldg. Location - 2620 Seacrest Blvd. Agent Jack Hawk - Hawk, Fulwider & Associates File No. NWSP 99-010 Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Please review the plans and exhibits and transmit formal written comments or e-mail to JoAnn Alea and I no later than 5:00 P.M. on Mav 25. 1999, When preparing your comments, please separate them into two categories; code deficiencies with code sections referenced and recommendations that you believe will enhance the project. Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval: 1. Use the review standards specified in Part IV, Land Development Regulations, Site Plan Review and the applicable code sections of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments. 2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete with the exception of traffic data, however, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the reviewer by contacting Scott Barber, or myself. 3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the documents. FIRE & LIFE SAFETY DIVISION Memorandum No. 99-289 .... "'''',' . - '-'. ~ NFPA Life Safety Code 101, National Fire Code 1, all applicable National Fire Protection Association codes, and the City Fire code shall be adhered to. FROM: Steve Gale, Fire Marshal Deputy Chief - Fire Rescue Departm m~uu~@ MAY Ill. E nt PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. TO: Mike Rumpf, Director Planning & Zoning Division DATE: May 17,1999 SUBJECT: Dr. Verma Office Bldg. 2620 S. Seacrest Blvd. NWSP 99-010 There was no water distribution plan provided. A fire flow test is required; LOR 6-16. This plan is not ready to go forward in the process. CC: File DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 99-118 TO: Michael Rumpf, Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Michael E. Haag, Building Code Permit Administrator DATE: May 20, 1999 RE: Dr. Verma Office Bldg. - New Site Plan (NWSP 99-010) st review comments We have reviewed the plans for the above-referenced project and recommend that the following comments be addressed prior to the project being forwarded for Board review: Buildinl! Division (Site Suecific and Permit Comments) - Michael E. Haag (561) 742-6352 L Add to the site plan (sheet A.I) a labeled symbol that represents and shows the location of the accessible route that is required between the accessible parking space and the accessible entrance to the building. Add text that would indicate the label represents the accessible route and the route is in compliance with Section 43 (Accessible Route) and 4.6 (parking and Passenger Loading Zones) ofthe Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. Please note that at time of permit review the applicant shall provide detailed data on the plans that will verifY that the path ofthe accessible route is in compliance with the regulations of the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. 2. Identify the finish floor elevation within the footprint of the building that is illustrated on the site plan (sheet A.I) and the floor plan drawing (sheet A.2). Add to the site data, found on sheet A.I, the flood zone that the building is located within including, where applicable, base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. Add specifications to the site data that will verify that the proposed finish floor elevation is in compliance with the minimum standards of the following: a) Minimum elevation required by the flood zone. b) Minimum elevation required by the South Florida Water Management District permit for the project. c) Show and provide computations that verifY the elevation of the finish floor is six inches or more above the crown ofthe abutting right-of-way. Building Division Memo No. 99-118 to Michael Rumpf RE: Dr. Verma Office Building - 1 st Review May 20, 1999 Page Two 3. Provide detailed and dimensioned elevation view drawings of the site signage including stating the total sign area and height of the sign. Also, show and dimension on the plan view drawings the distance the site sign is located from the adjacent property lines (note: ten feet is minimum). Or Place the following note on the site plan: "Site signage is not approved for this project. Separate site plan review and approval is required for site signage." Drawings of the signage shall comply with the applicable regulations specified in the Sign Code (Chapter 21 of the Land Development Regulations). If a site sign is proposed, delineate on the landscape plan the location of the landscaping that is required for site signage. 4. Provide detailed and dimensioned elevation view drawings of the building signage. On the elevation view drawings of the building, identify the length and height of the signage. Also, identify the total sign area and provide computations that verify the sign area( s) are in compliance with the Sign Code. Or Place the following note on the site plan: "Building signage is not approved for this project Separate site plan review and approval is required for building signage." Drawings of the signage shall comply with the applicable regulations specified in the Sign code (Chapter 21 of the Land Development Regulations). 5. At time of permit review, identify on the site plan the actual setback dimension from the leading edge ofthe west face of the building to the west property lines. Please note that overhang, covered walkways, canopies or awnings are considered when setbacks are identified. The building setbacks shall comply with Zoning Code regulations. 6. At time of permit submittal, provide an executed City Unity of Title form. The form shall combine all lots or parcels as one lot The processing of the form shall follow the Unity of Title procedures. 7. Add to the site plan drawing a labeled symbol that represents the location of the site lighting poles. Also, note on the site plan that the site lighting fixtures will illuminate the site consistent with the specifications identified in the Parking Lot Code. MEH:bg J:ISHRDATAIDevelopmentIBuilding-6870IDocumen1sITRCINWSP 99-010 1st review Dr. Verma Office Bldg..doc Parks Division Memorandum- TRC To: Mike Rumpf, Acting Planning and Zoning Manager H' Kevin J Hallahan, Forester I Environmentalist IL-b Dr. Verma Office Building New Site Plan - 1st Review From: Subject: Date: May 25, 1999 The applicant shows on the survey that there are 8 existing trees on the site. One tree is to remain and one tree is to be relocated along Seacrest Blvd. If the relocated tree does not survive the transplanting, the tree will be replaced during the landscaping portion ofthe project. The remainder of the 6 trees should be identified and an indication of preservation, relocation or removal/replacement. The project should continue in the normal review process. /fDJ ~ & m u WI ~ JnJ iJl]j MAY 2 519!l1 ~j CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Michael Rumpf DATE: SUBJECT: FROM: Sgt. Jensen REFERENCES: ENCLOSURES: RefNWSP # 99-010 Dr Verma Office Building No Comments 5-17-99 NWSP-99-010 '{OJ [ff & [ff n W [ff Jfil UlJj MAy I 7 $l @J PZLANNING AND ONING DfPl FILE: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #99-103 TO: Michael Rumpf, Planning & Zoning Director Larry Quinn, Assistant Public Works Director "(jJ Site Plan Review - 1 st Review - Dr. Verma Office Blvd. FROM: SUBJ: DATE: May 17,1999 The Public Works Department has no comments in reference to the site plan review listed above. LQ/cr . m~~ ~,:~\rn PLf.,J~t~lr!G AND ZONING DEPT. LEISURE SERVICES PARKS DIVISION MEMORANDUM TO: Mike Rumpf, Director of Planning & Zoning John Wildner, Parks Superintendent 8 W / /-1. Dr. Verma Office Building FROM: RE: DATE: May 26, 1999 I have no comments on the above project. The project should continue in the normal review process. JW:ad i@ ~,.: :6H~ m m -..~ I,;, " , .~-.._--~-" .-'.--. -: i;ND ."JEPf. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM ENG 99-079 TO: Michael W. Rumpf, Director of Planning & Zoning Raymond F. Davidson, P.E., Acting City Engi~ May 28, 1999 FROM: DATE: RE: DR. VERMA OFFICE BLDG. - (NWSP 99-010) NEW SITE PLAN 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS I. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following: site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies, such as FDOT, PBC, SFWMD, DERM, L WDD, DEP and any others, shall be included with your permit request 2. Add a general note on the Site and Paving and Drainage Plan that all signage, striping and markings shall conform to City Standard Drawing B-98001 and correct the handicap parking stall detail accordingly. 3. On the Site and Paving and Drainage Plan, show an accessible handicap path from the public sidewalk to the building in accordance with the Florida Accessibility Code. Also, indicate on the plans how handicap access is provided from the handicap parking space to the building entrance. 4. Show on the Site and Paving and Drainage Plans all traffic control devices, i.e. stop signs, stop bars, lane separation stripes and arrow markings. [LDR Chapter 4, Section 7.B.2.] 5. On the Paving and Drainage Plans specify that the new sidewalk through the driveway shall be a minimum of 6"thick. [LDR Chapter 23, Article II.P.] 6. On the Paving and Drainage Plan provide an Engineer's certification that the drainage plan shall conform to the City's Land Development Regulations. [LDR Chapter 4, Section 7.F.] 7. On the Paving and Drainage Plan provide a general note that the drainage system shall conform to the Utility Department Standards. Correct details accordingly. 8. On the Landscape Plan identify the clear sight triangular areas on both sides of the driveway and adjust the Landscape Plan if needed. [LDR Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.2.] Add a note to Landscape Plan that within the sight triangles, there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 30" and 6' above the pavement [LDR Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.] 9. Landscape areas in parking lots must be protected by wheel stops or curbs. [LDR Chapter 23, Article II.E.] Provide concrete curb for areas not protected by wheel stops. 10. Provide a satisfactory lighting plan. [LDR Chapter 23, Article ILA.] RFD/ck Xc: Ken Hall C:\My Documents\Dr. Verma Office Bldg. New Site Plan 1 st Review.doc MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 99 - 164 TO: Mike Rumpf, Planning Director li\1~ I; ~ I ~ ~ ~ \\\'U l<\M 'l. S - FROM: John A. Guidry, Utilities Director DATE: May 25, 1999 ""\,,G~"\) ~to,,\"G \It.~l SUBJECT: Dr. Verma Office Building We offer the following comments on this project: GENERAL COMMENTS 1) All utilities easements shall be shown on the rectified landscaping drawings so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. LOR Sec. 7.5-18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 2) Dept. of HRS permits may be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project. (Sec. 26-12) Points of connection to the water and sewer systems have not been shown. 3) Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1500 g.p.m. as stated in LOR chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater. (see Sec. 26-16(a)). Please submit these calculations with your HRS permit submittal. 4) Sec. 26-34(E) of the City Code requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon my request for signature on the Health Dept. application forms or within 30 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 5) Comp Plan policy 3C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available. 6) Provide an engineer's written certification that drainage will conform to all rules of the City and the South Florida Water Management District. (LOR Chap. 4, sec. 7F) SPECIFIC CONDITIONS I) Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in Sec. 26-33(a) of the Code. 2) This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the certificate of occupancy. 3) LOR chap. 6, Article IV, Sec. 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. 4) Appropriate backflow preventers will be required on the domestic water service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in accordance with Sec. 26-207. 5) A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this office has approved the plans for the water andlor sewer improvements required to serve the project. (Sec. 26-15) Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella (742-6404) of this office. JAGIPVM Xc: Skip Milor Peter Mazzella File DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMEN1 MEMORANDUM f~O. PZ 99-129 TO: TRC MEMBERS Bob Borden, Assistant Fire Marshal Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Sgt. Eric Jensen, Police Department Pete Mazzella, Utilities Department Michael Haag, Building Division Ken Hall, Engineering Division AI Kim, Public Works Department John Wildner, Parks Division Ray Davidson, Acting City Engineer /VD C iO /It1 Jttf { tV r Y f FROM: ;o/?lL Michael W. Rumpf Director of Planning and Zoning DATE: May 12, 1999 RE: SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES 1ST Review - New Site Plan Project Dr. Verma Office Bldg. Location - 2620 Seacrest Blvd. Agent Jack Hawk - Hawk, Fulwider & Associates File No. NWSP 99-010 Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Please review the plans and exhibits and transmit formal written comments or e-mail to JoAnn Alea and I no later than 5:00 P.M. on Mav 25. 1999. When preparing your comments, please separate them into two categories; code deficiencies with code sections referenced and recommendations that you believe will enhance the project. Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval: 1. Use the review standards specified in Part IV, Land Development Regulations, Site Plan Review and the applicable code sections of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments. 2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete with the exception of traffic data, however, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the reviewer by contacting Scott Barber, or myself. 3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the documents. Page 2 . 4. Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with other departmental improvements. 5. When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review specified. 6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memorandum, within the time frame stated above, to me. The memorandum shall state that the plans are approved and that they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and that they recommend the project be forwarded through the approval process. All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted or e-mailed to JoAnn Alea and I for distribution to the applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memorandum or e- mail. Scott Barber will be the Planning and Zoning staff member coordinating the review of the project. First review comments will be transmitted to the applicant along with a list of Technical Review Committee (TRC) members. MWR:jma Attachment xc: William Bingham, Fire Chief Marshall Gage, Police Chief John Guidry, Utilities Director Don Johnson, Building Division Larry Roberts, Public Works Director Central File J:\SHRDATA\PLANNING\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\QUANTUM\QUANTUM PARK LOT 3\1 STREVIEW-PLANS.DOC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 00-048 TO: John Guidry, Interim Director of Engineering Mike Haag, Building Code Administrator . Pl,-,R- MIchael w. Rumpf Planning and Zoning Director FROM: DATE: February 24, 2000 SUBJECT: Dr. Verma Office Building Southeast corner of Sea crest Boulevard and S.W. 25th Avenue Attached is the rectified plans for the above-referenced project approved by the City Commission. This is being sent to you for your files as it has been rectified and staff comments have been addressed and accurately represents the approved master plan. MWR/dim J.\SHRDATA\PLANNING\SHAREDlWPlPROIECTS\DR VERMA OFFICE BLDGIMEMO RECTIFIED CONTROL PLANS_DOC DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 00-034 TO: Bob Borden, Assistant Fire Marshal Larry Quinn, Public Works Mike Haag, Building Division Ken Hall, Engineering Division Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Pete Mazzella, Utilities Department Mike Lane, Police Department John Wildner, Parks Division FROM: Michael W. Rumpf, Director of Planning and Zonin~G/R- DATE: February 14, 2000 SUBJECT: Rectified Plans for DR. VERMA OFFICE BUilDING New Site Plan (NWSP 99-010) The amended new conditional use and site plan for Dr. Verma Office Building has been submitted for final sign-off by the Technical Review Committee. Four (4) sets of plans, each requiring your unconditional signature, are available for review in Planning and Zoning. A copy of the originally reviewed plans, staff comments and development order are available for your use to perform the review. Please review and sign-off each of the four (4) sets of plans, No later than, 5:00 P.M., FEBRUARY 23, 2000, If the plans are not in compliance with your staff comments or City regulations, do not sign the plans but only indicate the memorandum number where your comments are documented.. To facilitate the sign-off process, please resubmit written comments addressed to the Planning and Zoning Director, NO LATER THAN 5:00 P,M., FEBRUARY 23, 2000. Thank you for your prompt response to this request MWRdim cc: William Bingham, Fire Chief Marshall Gage, Police Chief John Guidry, Utilities Director J:\SHRDATA\PlANNING\SHAREO\'vVP\PROJECTS\DR VERMA OFFICE BLDG\RECTIFIED 2-14-00.00C DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 00-034 TO: Bob Borden, Assistant Fire Marshal Larry Quinn, Public Works Mike Haag, Building Division Ken Hall, Engineering Division Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Pete Mazzella, Utilities Department Mike Lane, Police Department John Wildner, Parks Division FROM: Michael W. Rumpf, Director of Planning and zonin: vEZ- DATE: February 14, 2000 SUBJECT: Rectified Plans for DR. VERMA OFFICE BUilDING New Site Plan (NWSP 99-010) The amended new conditional use and site plan for Dr. Verma Office Building has been submitted for final sign-off by the Technical Review Committee. Four (4) sets of plans, each requiring your unconditional signature, are available for review in Planning and Zoning. A copy of the originally reviewed plans, staff comments and development order are available for your use to perform the review. Please review and sign-off each of the four (4) sets of plans, No later than, 5:00 P.M., " FEBRUARY 23, 2000. If the plans are not in compliance with your staff comments or City regulations, do not sign the plans but only indicate the memorandum number where your comments are documented.. To facilitate the sign-off process, please resubmit written comments addressed to the Planning and Zoning Director, NO LATER THAN 5:00 P.M., FEBRUARY 23, 2000. Thank you for your prompt response to this request. MWR:dim J cc: William Bingham, Fire Chief Marshall Gage, Police Chief John Guidry, Utilities Director J:\SHRDATA\PLANNING\SHARED\\foJP\PROJECTS\DR VERMA OFFICE BLDG\RECTIFIED 2-14-QO.DOC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 00-048 TO: John Guidry, Interim Director of Engineering Mike Haag, Building Code Administrator . rPl"4c Michael W. Rump Planning and Zoning Director FROM: DATE: February 24, 2000 SUBJECT: Dr. Verma Office Building Southeast corner of Sea crest Boulevard and S.W. 25th Avenue Attached is the rectified plans for the above-referenced project approved by the City Commission. This is being sent to you for your files as it has been rectified and staff comments have been addressed and accurately represents the approved master plan. MWRldim J:\SHRDATAIPLANNING\SHARED\WP\PROIECTS\DR VERMA OFFICE BLDG\MEMO RECTIFIED CONTROL PLANS,DOC DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 00-034 TO: Bob Borden, Assistant Fire Marshal Larry Quinn, Public Works Mike Haag, Building Division Ken Hall, Engineering Division Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Pete Mazzella, Utilities Department Mike Lane, Police Department John Wildner, Parks Division FROM: Michael W. Rumpf, Director of Planning and Zonin~~ DATE: February 14, 2000 SUBJECT: Rectified Plans for DR. VERMA OFFICE BUilDING New Site Plan (NWSP 99-010) The amended new conditional use and site plan for Dr. Verma Office Building has been submitted for final sign-off by the Technical Review Committee. Four (4) sets of plans, each requiring your unconditional signature, are available for review in Planning and Zoning. A copy of the originally reviewed plans, staff comments and development order are available for your use to perform the review. Please review and sign-off each of the four (4) sets of plans, No later than, 5:00 P.M., FEBRUARY 23, 2000. If the plans are not in compliance with your staff comments or City regulations, do not sign the plans but only indicate the memorandum number where your comments are documented.. To facilitate the sign-off process, please resubmit written comments addressed to the Planning and Zoning Director, NO LATER THAN 5:00 P.M., FEBRUARY 23, 2000. Thank you for your prompt response to this request. MWRdim cc: William Bingham, Fire Chief Marshall Gage, Police Chief John Guidry, Utilities Director J:\SHROATA\PLANNING\SHARED\VVP\PROJECTS\DR VERMA OFFICE BLOG\RECTIFIED 2-14..QO.DOC MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 99 - 164 TO: M~f, Planning Director .fl-- John A. Guidry, Utilities Director FROM: DATE: May 25, 1999 SUBJECT: Dr. Verma Office Building We offer the following comments on this project: GENERAL COMMENTS 1) All utilities easements shall be shown on the rectified landscaping drawings so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. LDR Sec. 7.5-18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 2) Dept. of HRS permits may be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project. (Sec. 26-12) Points of connection to the water and sewer systems have not been shown. 3) Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1500 g.p.m. as stated in LDR chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater. (see Sec. 26-16(a)). Please submit these calculations with your HRS permit submittal. 4) Sec. 26-34(E) of the City Code requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon my request for signature on the Health Dept. application forms or within 30 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 5) Comp Plan policy 3C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available. 6) Provide an engineer's written certification that drainage will conform to all rules of the City and the South Florida Water Management District. (LDR Chap. 4, sec. 7F) SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1) Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in Sec. 26-33(a) of the Code. 2) This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the certificate of occupancy. 3) LDR chap. 6, Article IV, Sec. 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. 4) Appropriate backflow preventers will be required on the domestic water service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in accordance with Sec. 26-207. 5) A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this office has approved the plans for the water andlor sewer improvements required to serve the project. (Sec. 26-15) Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella (742-6404) of this office. JAG/PVM Xc: Skip Milor Peter Mazzella File , 'l , 26 .' '" }f ......, I I - . " ."~J ._"."",~ "--,,,.,,,...-,,,..---,,,,_.~-~,,-:~,~- Ul EI DEl ElEl l/ f ill . i:o ( \. I~~'" i;l~ !i!i ~ 1\ ~ tb= ~ / = u!l! rr.t "'- M ~ ~ 1~1!I_ii EXHIBIT B - ... 11\1 . ~C I rill) -i 1l1!i1ll- (0- i. I :z Ii! +- 0- j I o ..-----l , nm__m_ nn_~- ' ..- ... i. it Ul I~d I I~~~ lli!1 ~ . .. J J ~ ni .- -,,- illll ,.hill;e ~ IhfnJii !!!!uu is lUludl ~ ~ .. u.. u.. u .__. --.. u..... - u,91.'9U . r.l~ 11 . , II I I it If iI I . -............. ~ .... . , III / r .11 . I ;nail'" !iZ =6 r 1~III_ii u. EXHIBIT B d! likt H fj~JUt. 1 IJIII,!r.:!I I I.. .. .. r l III'{l ~ ~"'I~ ~ (r ~ I ~l I t ~ i W:e ; ~ ~~ ~~ U Dill ~ f mill i .1 ~~ ~i t2 Ii: .. 1 IU 111 "; 6 It 1I~ _U ~ I mil I ~~ (0 ~ . ~ ~ . ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _."J~""-"-""!li8lWt. _ ....... .. -- -----------------------. ... -- . . . --- / /'1 /.- / /"$ ~i!i - ik.r / lllil -~----~._----- -..---.---- .- Ul. i J I I~~~ !!~!I I r;, .. . II nth fl 1. 1 d Ii i u !t. b fi .J II (-I ~ ; 1 . .1. I . . I I atB . 1 I _I .........-. -.... ~ . ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ I ~ la: EXHIBIT B ........-. -- I t I ) JII} . "I . .1;11 · .1. 1 lIB)! 1~~(tI d II~ 1 .1..1. U 1 I ! I I~II r: 111'1 1 I _Inn II I~ u. ~~ ~ ~ ~ . I. :::. ~ ~ ~ I!I: I~~i ~i!1 --,- --. - .-.-,,-..,....----- en ..... - en - :c >< LU lit \1 ~ 1\ "\\ i~ t ~ ~ c , , . l\\ , ~ \ ~l '\\"~' , ,\\1~.. '\1 \ \" II 1 'I \ ,1t U Ill- '9 ,... . .. ;:. .-----~ .~----_._.- ~ -~ :::..---=-:::; ~l \~~\ \ ~ \t. !~~ ~ E~\-.\\arr a ",,'" ,,~ l\ 1.( ~ It ~.. ",,'" --- ",... ...- - I~I Il\f I. I, :0 lilli I-f~ . ~ '. ~/l\[p s ~ I;t f1~i~ n~' r ~ !. ~ _~ \1 j J . ~ ~ 7 j ~ f. L \___ U I m m U' tLc !,. o iU r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: i1 v t- ~~J"= ~ i ~~ 1 i; !eo ~t [~ 1\ Ilill tt . ;~ b:,.- 11 !.. rfi -' i tl~ oF I\=I~ :::"'--l I :. S~ "= p!l /? N>ll I ln1 \\ i ~ - hm;~~ ' ,~ .. ~ ~ i~ '!! I -;;.." ~ ....~( --:7 \ E j! j ~ ' J ~ t.. ,,/::!<V . ". ------Y------~ "c"',,:; ~ ffil/: / ,j', F ,............... If 111 . . . / / i} \ ._._ ..-..F"'lI ' · , ,", (T7 .. l!l ..... ? i ': " _;Ii? ~~~, _ dlt II m , i i llli ~i ~? hi, Ell I lLil --; tl j I, I): J~ ~ \ I IX -----------r--~--j -l i~ \ . , i i :I: !iI !i!~ . " a - - ~8~= JiS~ !IiI' I ~ II: tlU. - ----. -_...-.._..._~----- '- E] uEl E]E c 1/ i )l .. D r III ----~ 11 J) ''.. c , \ l\\ , , \ . \ '" ... . ... :> ---------.- ----- 10 \r~ \~,t !\\\ ~ "".... lot \ l' 1,' I l~ d. ~.. "".... - ..... ~ . ~ ~ J~~i !ill .-._--- III J i~~~ "I' ~~U IBk !s~ Ul, ; I I fl I, I If Ii i u !~ II fi tJ II III ~ ; 1 I . I . .,. t . J IfB I I II ..........-. -.... ~J i ~ I!I: ~ ..........-. -.... I I I I JII. M ... . I,- :::. I~ ~ ~ . I nl , 1 . fl. I i 11UII ~ . ~ ~ 1 tUfiI d I,ll ! J IfUr: .,11 I I .. n II