Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS Alea, Joann From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Mazzella, Pete Friday, October 29, 1999 11 :05 AM Rumpf, Michael; Alea, Joann Guidry, John Sterling records management & Wal-Mart Mike Attached are my comments for Sterling. It is not ready for sign-off, and may have a major problem regarding drainage. Also, as we discussed on tuesday, the Wal-mart plans are significantly different than the original. I'm not sure how you want to handle the site plan issues, but I have already requested revised engineering plans from the project engineer at Kimley Horn. My office had already approved the water and sewer plans for the Health Dept. permit, but Kimley Horn made subsequent changes to that approved set, which were not shown to us. I will deal with their engineer directly on that issue, since it is at the permitting phase. Pete ~ sterling rectified comments.do... 1 ...... '-' o o . ................- PARKS FIRE BLDG/ENGR FORESTER LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS PLACED AT THE PROPERTY. DATE SENT I SIGNS INSTALLED: BOARD MEETING DATE: BOARD: DATE: CITY COMMISSION: DATE: DEVELOPMENT ORDER RECEIVED FROM CITY CLERK: 0 DATE: DEVELOPMENT ORDER SENT TO APPLICANT: 0 DATE: S:\FORMS\TRACKING LOG FORM - 3/98 CAULFIELD & WHEELER, INC. Consulting Engineers. Planners. Surveyors Jillle 21,1999 Mr. Michael Rumpf, Director Planning & Zoning Division City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, FL 33425 Subject: Sterling Records Management #NWSP 99-009 Our Proiect #3612 Dear Mr. RlUllpf: Following are responses to each of the First Review Comments for Sterling Records Management Site Plan. The comments were provided to me on Jillle 7, 1999. PUBLIC WORKS COMMENT RESPONSES: I. Per my telephone discussion with Larry Quinn, the dlUllpsters have been rotated to allow easier access. UTILITIES COMMENT RESPONSES: 2. All proposed utility easements are shown on the site and landscape plans. All canopy trees are out of these easements on the landscape plan. 3. An application will be submitted for Department ofHRS permits immediately after City plan approval. 4. Fire flow calculations meeting the required standards will be submitted with the HRS permit package. 5. The capacity reservation fee will be submitted as specified (within 30 days of site plan approval or with the request for City signatures on the HRS permit application). 6. A well and pump is proposed for the landscape irrigation. Please see Note #12 on Sheet LP2. 7. An engineer's written certification that the drainage will conform to City and SFWMD rules is included with this resubmission. 7301-A West Palmetto Park Road. Suite 100A Boca Raton, Florida 33433 561.392-1991 FaJc 561' 750-1452 Engineering # EB-0003591 Surveying # LB-0003591 Landscape Architecture # LC~OOO0318 Page 2 - Jillle 21, 1999 Mr. Michael RlUllpf, Director City of Boynton Beach 8. All proposed easements are noted on the plans. These easements are a min. 12' wide and will be dedicated to the City as provided by the Land Development Code. 9. No response required, comment noted. 10. Backflow preventers have been added to the engineering plans. II. No response required, comment noted. 12. Drainage calculations are included with this resubmission package. 13. This is not a manufacturing process project. Manholes may be used as a sampling point. FIRE COMMENT RESPONSES: 14. A fire flow calculation test will be performed as required by the Land Development Code. 15. Fire hydrant layout is designed to meet all code requirements. 16. No response required, comment noted. BUILDING DIVISION COMMENT RESPONSES: 17. Requested notes regarding the handicap accessible route and building entrances have been added to the site plan. 18. The finish floor elevations have been corrected. The flood zone has been noted on the site plan. MinimlUll elevations required by the flood zone have been added to the site plan along with SFWMD minimlUll elevations and the road crown/finish floor elevations. 19. All setback and dimensions requested have been added to the site plan. Setback information has been noted. 20. All signage will be reviewed illlder a separate site plan review at a later date. Site plan architectural plans and landscape plans have been noted that sign approvals will be by separate site plan review. The above information has been added as a note on the site plan, landscape plan, and architectural plans. 21. The property line has been labeled on the site plan. 22. Please refer to comment response #20 above. All signage will be approved by separate submission at a later date. 23. The site lighting is noted on the site plan. A note has been added stating the site lighting will meet the requirements of the Land Development Code. The photometric plan has been removed from the site plan package and will be submitted with the building permit drawings. ENGINEERING DIVISION COMMENT RESPONSES: 24. No response required, comment noted. 25. The note on the site plan detail has been revised. Page 3 - Jillle 21,1999 Mr. Michael RlUllpf, Director City of Boynton Beach 26. Per my telephone discussion with Ken Hall, the clear sight visibility triangle has been noted at 25' on the site and landscape plan. 27. Traffic control markings and signage have been shown on the site plan and engineering plan. 28. The requested certification letter has been included with this resubmission (see comment response #7). 29. Flow arrows have been added to the Paving, Grading & Drainage Plan. 30. A flush header curb has been shown on the site and engineering plans within the right-of- way. 31. The street sidewalk has been noted as 6" thick and continuous across the driveway on the site and engineering plans. 32. Pavement cross-sections have been added to the engineering plans. 33. The photometric plan has been removed from this resubmission pursuant to comment #23. The requested note will be added to the photometric plan when it is submitted for permit. 34. Baffles are now provided in the trench areas. 35. The finish floor elevation discrepancy has been corrected. PLANNING & ZONING COMMENT RESPONSES: 36. The requested information has been added to the site plan: a) vehicular use landscape area b) zoning and land use c) required and proposed handicap parking d) parking calculations/projected nlUllber of employees 37. The typical loading space has been dimensioned on the site plan. 38. The typical parking space width has been added to the site plan. 39. The safe sight triangles have been added (see also comment response #26). 40. The fire lane has been labeled on the site plan per my telephone discussion with Bob Borden. 41. The driveway width has been dimensioned. 42. Signage is not part of this submission. A separate site plan submission will be made for all signage at a later date. See related comment response #20. 43. The nlUllber of building stories has been added to the site plan. 44. Traffic signage and pavement markings have been added to the site plan and engineering plans. 45. The driveway throat length has been added to the site plan. 46. An accessible walk from the street sidewalk is on the site plan. The accessible route has been noted per response comment # 17. 47. The required landscape aroillld dlUllpsters has been added to the landscape plan. 48. The minimum tree spacing along the right-of-way has been added to the landscape plan. Page 4 - Jillle 21, 1999 Mr. Michael RlUllpf, Director City of Boynton Beach 49. Approved mulch is noted on Sheet LP2, Note #19. 50. See Note #12 on Sheet LP2 for irrigation information. 5!. All proposed lighting is indicated on the site and landscape plans. 52. A traffic analysis is currently being prepared and will be submitted to Palm Beach COilllty for traffic performance standard review. You will be copied on all correspondence. The attached site plan packages reflect the items noted above and are submitted so this application can be heard by the Planning and Development Board at the July meeting. I have included an 8112 x II copy of the site plan for your use. Please contact me if I can provide any further information. Sincerely, Caulfield & Wheeler, Inc. SET:jd enclosure cc: Sterling Real Estate, LLC (wi plans) Joseph Gambino - Construction Consulting Group (wi plans) Eric Cyrus - Miller Construction (wi plans) Alfonso Hernandez - Retzsch, Lanao, Caycedo (wi plans) Pedro Duquesne - Donnell, Duquesne, et al. (Fax #305-666-5259) Robbie Phillips - Phillips Fire Sprinklers (Fax #954-217-0601) Matthew Thompson - TEC (fax #274-0222) word2\letters\3612\lst review commenls resp.doc DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 99-252 TO: Bob Borden, Assistant Fire Marshal larry Quinn, Public Works Mike Haag, Building Division Ken Hall, Engineering Division Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Pete Mazzella, Utilities Department lee Thompson, Police Department John Wildner, Parks Division Jack Casler, Acting City Engineer /-trt:: Michael W. Rumpf, Director of Planning and Zoning FROM: DATE: October 25, 1999 SUBJECT: Rectified Plans for: Wal*Mart (NWSP 99-003) Sterling Records Management (NWSP 99-009) The amended new site plan for Wal*Mart and Sterling Records Management has been submitted for final sign-off by the Technical Review Committee. Four (4) sets of plans, each requiring your unconditional signature, are available for review in Planning and Zoning. A copy of the originally reviewed plans, staff comments and development order are available for your use to perform the review. Please review and sign-off each of the four (4) sets of plans, NO LATER THAN 5:00 P.M., November 3, 1999. If the plans are not in compliance with your staff comments or City regulations, do not sign the plans but only indicate the memorandum number where your comments are documented. To facilitate the sign-off process, please resubmit written or electronic comments addressed to the Planning and Zoning Director, NO LATER THAN 5:00 P.M., Date. Thank you for your prompt response to this request. MWRjma cc: William Bingham, Fire Chief Marshall Gage, Police Chief John Guidry, Utilities Director \\CH\MAIN\SHRDATA\PLANNING\SHARED\'NPIPROJECTS\RECT1FIED LEITER FORM. DOC DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT / BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 99-115 ---------- /~ // /' /:; ,.;,; TO: Michael RlUllpf, Planning and Zoningpirector / Michael E. Haag, Building CodyP~rmit Administrator May 19, 1999 / / l~' ......."" FROM: DATE: RE: ('.. Sterling Records Managemen' - New Site Plan (NWSP 99-009) ,----!st review comments ---'-'~-'--'''-'-''-'-'-'----'''-----'-'._- We have reviewed the plans for the above-referenced project and recommend that the following comments be addressed prior to the project being forwarded for Board review: Buildinl! Division (Site SDecific and Permit Comments) - Michael E. Haag (561) 742-6352 !. Add to the site plan (sheet SPI) a labeled symbol that represents and shows the location of the accessible route that is required between the accessible parking spaces and the accessible entrance to each tenant space. Add text that would indicate the label represents the accessible route and the route is in compliance with Section 4.3 (Accessible Route) and 4.6 (Parking and Passenger Loading Zones) of the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. Please note that at time of permit review the applicant shall provide detailed data on the plans that will verifY that the path of the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations of the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. 2. The site plan drawing and the floor plan drawings are inconsistent with respect to identifYing the proposed finish floor elevation. Correct the inconsistencies. Add to the site data, found on sheet SP1, the flood zone that the buildings are located within including, where applicable, base flood elevation. Ifthere is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. Add specifications to the site data that will verifY that the proposed finish floor elevation is in compliance with the minimum standards of the following: a) MinimlUll elevation required by the flood zone. b) MinimlUll elevation required by the South Florida Water Management District permit for the project. c) Show and provide computations that verifY the elevation of the finish floor is six inches or more above the crown of the abutting right-of-way. I 1i , ? 0 '., "~ j " ~-~,--1 Building Division Memo No. 99-115 to Michael RlUllpf Re: Sterling Records Management - I st Review May 19, 1999 Page Two 3. At time of permit review, identify on the site plan the actual setback dimension from the leading edge of the north and south faces of building #2 to the adjacent property lines. Also, identify on the plan the closest dimension between building #1 and building #2. Please note that the setback dimension shall be measured from the overhang, covered walkways, canopies or awnings. The building setbacks shall comply with Zoning Code regulations. 4. Provide detailed and dimensioned elevation view drawings ofthe site signage. Indicate the total sign area and height of the sign including providing computations that verify the sign area complies with the regulations of the Sign Code. Also, show and dimension on the plan view drawings the distance the site sign is located from the adjacent property lines (note: ten feet is the minimum setback from any property line) or place the following note on the site plan: "Site signage is not approved for this project. Separate site plan review and approval is required for site signage." Drawings of the signage shall comply with the applicable regulations specified in the Sign Code (Chapter 21 of the Land Development Regnlations). Delineate on the landscape plan the location of the landscaping that is required for site slgnage. 5. On sheet SPI, identify the symbol that represents the property line. 6. On the elevation view drawings of both buildings, identify the length and height of the proposed building signage. Identify the total sign area of each sign including providing computations that verify the area of the signs is in compliance with the Sign Code. Indicate on the drawing of the building signage whether the signs will be illuminated and state types of illumination. Drawings of the signage shall comply with the applicable regulations specified in the Sign Code (Chapter 21 of the Land Development Regnlations). 7. Add to the site plan drawing a labeled symbol that represents the location of the site lighting poles. Also, note on the site plan that the site lighting fixtures will illlUllinate the site consistent with the specifications identified in the Parking Lot Code. A photometric plan is reviewed at time of permit review and is not required for site plan review. Therefore, remove the drawing from the submittal. MEH:bg J:\SHRDATA\Development\Building-6870\Documents\TRC\NWSP 99~009 1st review Sterling Records Management.doc MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 99 - 161 TO: Mike Rumpf, Planning Director FROM: John A. Guidry, Utilities Director DATE: May 25, 1999 SUBJECT: Sterling Records Management - New Site Plan - 1" review We offer the following commenls on this project: GENERAL COMMENTS 1) All utilities easements shall be shown on the rectified landscaping drawings so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. LDR Sec. 7.5-18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 2) Dept. of HRS permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project. (Sec. 26-12) 3) Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1500 g.p.m. as stated in LDR chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater. (see Sec. 26-16(a)). Please submit these calculations with your HRS permit submittal. 4) Sec. 26-34(E) of the City Code requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon my request for signature on the Health Dept. application forms or within 30 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be $4213.44, based upon two, 2-inch meters. 5) Comp Plan policy 3C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available. 6) Provide an engineer's written certification that drainage will conform with all rules of the City and the South Florida Water Management District. (LDR Chap. 4, sec. 7F). SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1) Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in Sec. 26-33(a) of the Code. 2) This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the certificate of occupancy. 3) Appropriate backflow preventers may be required on the domestic water service to the building, depending upon intended use, in accordance with Sec. 26-207. 4) A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this office has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to serve the project. (Sec. 26-15) 5) Provide drainage calculations showing the amount of rainfall to be retained on-site. Also indicate the point of positive discharge from the site to a receiving water body. 6) The waste stream from the manufacturing process must meet the City's pretreatment requirements. A sampling point must be provided to allow monitoring of this waste stream. (Sec. 26-143, 26-147) Please refer any questions on this matter to Peler Mazzella (742-6404) of this office. JAG/PVM Xc: Skip Milor Peter Mazzella File Parks Division Memorandum- TRe To Mike Rumpf, Acting Planning and Zoning Manager Kevin J Hallahan, Forester I Environmentalist ~}~ Sterling Records Management New Site Plan - 1st Review From: Subject: Date: May 2], 1999 I have no comments on the above project. The project should continue in the nonnal review . process. I' IF- '-\ IJ..J C. AN' (1,7..4-0 T\t-&S ~ ql$'~(,,\:''--\ \ )~ ~RLIJX R€L6yV)S Vh~eWJt3IJr Y~\J\f:--J l~u5T1-J~ VV}-I ~.broq ~ ~~ /) t'RDVIbt:. ~ t=cxJ1w t}Jc. I AJ~(5lU n.J ~ S~ P/.NJTAT3IJLW- ~ C(!t1 f :P-G 7 p~s) A )~10& CN.-wLAr/"C50S l N R'EP12J<-!?-lvCfZ /D =ft OF t;rv!PLDyAsS 13) VrnlW~ V.;E . ~ ~ (~ /.5 ~1J: Sg:: 5" ~0 S '1:)) U>l0lDcb AND /;AJJ() OS€- ~10J.-hn~ , liJ 11)D\)l[)1G ~()IRF1J kAnPR~ ttMJDICAP Cj'PPQ:.~ OJ..; <;/'712.- ~s~ 1- 5/6tre5 ~ j.) -1JI~~~ Cryp.) /Jw)}~~ w9W f>L~ ~) -PIMRJSIC51J tDt1J1tl Ot::- 'PMk}1J{;; 3,?ue t7Y?) 6lU C;n~ Pl/W C q) l f) -fflDvl~ ~Sllob1Tm~WS Ar Sl1E t=J.;~J F'RB'M IN"V~J et: UJVr;. ~ t<./W U)JE ({!;MA 1.5 kr1r $:.- -S ~ &t D~~6LUOP ow 11+6 CMQ!'~AfG-' pLt~. .~ ~~~~~(fb -. ------ t?: }- lA'5 SL fl tt::. l.fx;J.JE: (M1>> ~3 At:r 1f ~ m) &;,)- DJM~SloN (.,OIDn-t 6t- ~\VBwfi1 ~ L f\IlM- tv ~DTU 32J l cmr '2-'3 ~ ~ 1+1) 7.}- f'Pt,\J\r;fe UYJ.<nl5YVS 6f= 9.~/.Ut t>JJ Sire ~ ~ WHlt ~t/:;>l '(flAY- ~ kRJ6A L rVlM ltlsUo-Uf'J {oLDT0 I Vl1~ ~ ~~LS (tAA '2J Af:f IV %cS 1#t P- i\ - }.:f) , t).--~~ JJUWl13fdL OF S1beVF~ DU BuI0())/VG, q}-- PRfulDF 01"oP 9Joj.)S At /;:;1-11 iDIREGl1~ 51 h105 .AJJf) 10~~ 11?Af-f'l6S/&PS IoV I}$O~,J SlhJJS fJ.JH13fE ~P{(j~ C (J-#.- Z3 kff1[:pt&-8 (3;;') ~ (vCLU06' l'iL-F"f'f'l;.. c<,,,,,,J\M.>'\ .......fT/l. .....\"-l'-'~) sa(' g,1t-/l->. eTC (0 ~)- (..A13f3;l ~tfr DF-PPM;.~ ~ CJU4~ 7-3 ~ -r-A12 ItJ) n.") f{1.~\J;\1)c W'\...<..f.%SS,~ Lt lt1 A'V\:.- f(2.0...- i 'SIn TZJ TJfG-' 146M-Of- LJ'f'I<- ~ Dlr i/A-L1c.. @ ~w ~6'f]I A-V&N'!l6- . l'l)- fRb'VlDf.. -Jt!B 'R,~lJl'RF..JJ /.h.j);(bPl].J0 #WNO 1t1e tDMfSTfjG~of~ ~Zt~ CU- S ~ 1~).:~~9k0dpW~1~LAJtV 11* ~llJJlrVH)fJ /P~ ~l'}..J{j ALmJ~ ~ R/w P~hS ~ /-5 ~jj::"" ~5 P~D) ,1\"1'0- OlS UW"');(,~ ('l.,,,,,,,-, tY,)-fRbVlf/€; A }00~ ~ A- ~~"17#rN 0jPRE.S5 ~LL BE (Y;E/) t:U2- mUa-riU; 13gps 9 (t'. I~) ()r/ i7+!j GMU 0 S; tAfL- Pc..L>,-.-<.-> fIlL C Ii 10'<1 ,q.. ;JbrF ~AJ,-, "T7<fG ~>{) ) ~ JI-j(& I p,.J...JD CF"/f-UIr'H.:>& of- Tf1'C' (12(2.I1;Ih"1W ~f, W;c-. , Sill,... PCfl-1\l <; (}rJ 7[I-f~;J()scry6 tc,q...AJ (rJuLUO~ ft"vG rtl--cfO {,6'1> ~((Qr+nJJI..!l CH cf 2t-c 7 fA'L-.B LEISURE SERVICES PARKS MEMORANDUM TO: Michael Rumpf, Director of Planning & Zoning FROM: John Wildner, Parks Superintendent RE: Sterling Records Management ~ W / w DATE: May 26, 1999 I have no comments on the above project. The project should continue in the normal revIew process. JW:ad ~~ ~~~~~ \VIl\l 7. 6 \999 Pl~NN\NG t~f lONING 00' . ~ DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM ENG 99-074 TO: Michael W. RlUllpf, Director of Planning & Zoning Raymond F. Davidson, P.E., Acting City Engi~ May 24, 1999 0"&--' FROM: DATE: RE: STERLING RECORDS MANAGEMENT - (NWSP 99-009) NEW SITE PLAN 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS I. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following: site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies, such as FDOT, PBC, SFWMD, DERM, L WDD, DEP and any others, shall be included with your permit request. 2. Revise note #6 on the Site Plan to reference detail #B-9800 I. 3. On the Landscape Plan show a 35' clear sight visibility triangle in lieu of the 10' shown. Also add a note that there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility between 30" and 6' above pavement within the clear sight triangles. [LDR Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.2.] 4. On the Site Plan and Paving and Drainage Plan show all the traffic control markings and signage, i.e. stop signs, stop bars, ingresslegress, double yellow stripes, etc. [LDR Chapter 4, Section 7.B.] 5. Provide an Engineer's certification on the Paving and Drainage Plan that the drainage will conform with all rules, regulations and codes of the City's Land Development Regulations. [LDR Chapter 4, Section 7.F.] 6. Show the flow arrows on the Paving and Drainage Plan indicating drainage direction. [LDR Chapter 4, Section 7.F.] 7. Show a flush header curb within the right-of-way areas of the driveway on the Site and Paving and Drainage Plans. 8. Show the sidewalk continuous through the driveway with a minimlUll thickness of 6". [LDR Chapter 23, Article II.P.] 9. Provide a cross section detail and specifications of the asphalt and concrete pavement areas. 10. Specify on the Photometric Site Plan that the site lighting shall be activated by photoelectric switch. [LDR Chapter 23, Article II.A.] Department of Development Memorandum ENG 99-074 Re: Sterling Records Management (NWSP 99-009) - New Site Plan I st Review Comments May 24, 1999 Page Two II. Due to the intensity of truck vehicles on-site, pollution retardant baffles shall be required for all drainage structures that outfall to exfiltration trench. Drainage structures with pollution retardant baffles must be large enough to accommodate the baffles and still allow ample room for cleaning silt from the sumps of the structures. 12. Correct the discrepancy between the finish floor elevations on the Site and Paving & Drainage Plans. RFD/ck Xc: Ken Hall C:\My Documents\Sterling Records Mgmt. New Site Plan 1st Review.doc FIRE & LIFE SAFETY DIVISION Memorandum No. 99-288 ~ ~ NFPA Life Safety Code 101, National Fire Code 1, all applicable National Fire Protection Association codes, and the City Fire code shall be adhered to. TO: 00 i( ., ill . '--:;1 n I 4 1999 I ~ Mike Rumpf, Director Planning & Zoning Division Steve Gale, Fire Marshal 5 y Deputy Chief - Fire Rescue Department MAl PLAW,ING AND ZONING IlEPT. FROM: DATE: May 13, 1999 SUBJECT: Sterling Records Management North side of SW 35th Ave. NWSP 99-009 A fire flow calculation test will be required; LOR 6-16. Fire hydrants shall be no more than three hundred feet (300') apart and the remotest part of any structure shall be no more than two hundred feet (200') from a hydrant; LOR 6-16. All water mains, hydrants, and roadways will be in place prior to above ground construction; NFPA 1. I recommend this plan be forwarded with the above comments. cc: File FIRE & LIFE SAFETY DIVISION Memorandum No. 99-288 ~." 'IiIJ NFPA Life Safety Code 101, National Fire Code 1, all applicable National Fire Protection Association codes, and the City Fire code shall be adhered to. TO: Mike Rumpf, Director Planning & Zoning Division FROM: Steve Gale, Fire Marshal Deputy Chief - Fire Rescue Department DATE: May 13,1999 SUBJECT: Sterling Records Management North side of SW 35th Ave. NWSP 99-009 A fire flow calculation test will be required; LOR 6-16. Fire hydrants shall be no more than three hundred feet (300') apart and the remotest part of any structure shall be no more than two hundred feet (200') from a hydrant; LOR 6-16. All water mains, hydrants, and roadways will be in place prior to above ground construction; NFPA 1. I recommend this plan be forwarded with the above comments. CC: File CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Michael Rumpf FILE: DATE: SUBJECT: REFERENCES: ENCLOSURES: Ref NWSP 99-009 Sterling Records Mgt FROM: Sgt. Jensen NO COMMENTS 5-17-99 NWSP 99-009 $bt~ZbNgE~~D DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMEN BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 99-115 Id30 DNINOZ 1 ONV DNINNVld /@ 6661 0 Z AlfW ill IDffi1~m@m -.-- TO: Michael RlUllpf, Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Michael E. Haag, Building Code Permit Administrator DATE: May 19, 1999 RE: Sterling Records Management - New Site Plan (NWSP 99-009) 1st review comments We have reviewed the plans for the above-referenced project and recommend that the following comments be addressed prior to the project being forwarded for Board review: Buildinl! Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) - Michael E. Haag (561) 742-6352 I. Add to the site plan (sheet SP I) a labeled symbol that represents and shows the location of the accessible route that is required between the accessible parking spaces and the accessible entrance to each tenant space. Add text that would indicate the label represents the accessible route and the route is in compliance with Section 4.3 (Accessible Route) and 4.6 (Parking and Passenger Loading Zones) of the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. Please note that at time of permit review the applicant shall provide detailed data on the plans that will verifY that the path of the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations of the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. 2. The site plan drawing and the floor plan drawings are inconsistent with respect to identifYing the proposed finish floor elevation. Correct the inconsistencies. Add to the site data, fOWld on sheet SP I, the flood zone that the buildings are located within including, where applicable, base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. Add specifications to the site data that will verify that the proposed finish floor elevation is in compliance with the minimum standards ofthe following: a) MinimlUll elevation required by the flood zone. b) MinimlUll elevation required by the South Florida Water Management District permit for the project. c) Show and provide computations that verify the elevation of the finish floor is six inches or more above the crown ofthe abutting right-of-way. Building Division Memo No. 99-115 to Michael Rumpf Re: Sterling Records Management - I st Review May 19, 1999 Page Two 3. At time of permit review, identify on the site plan the actual setback dimension from the leading edge of the north and south faces of building #2 to the adjacent property lines. Also, identify on the plan the closest dimension between building #1 and building #2. Please note that the setback dimension shall be measured from the overhang, covered walkways, canopies or awnings. The building setbacks shall comply with Zoning Code regulations. 4. Provide detailed and dimensioned elevation view drawings of the site signage. Indicate the total sign area and height of the sign including providing computations that verify the sign area complies with the regulations of the Sign Code. Also, show and dimension on the plan view drawings the distance the site sign is located from the adjacent property lines (note: ten feet is the minimum setback from any property line) or place the following note on the site plan: "Site signage is not approved for this project. Separate site plan review and approval is required for site signage." Drawings of the signage shall comply with the applicable regulations specified in the Sign Code (Chapter 21 of the Land Development Regulations). Delineate on the landscape plan the location of the landscaping that is required for site slgnage. 5. On sheet SP I, identify the symbol that represents the property line. 6. On the elevation view drawings of both buildings, identify the length and height of the proposed building signage. Identify the total sign area of each sign including providing computations that verify the area of the signs is in compliance with the Sign Code. Indicate on the drawing of the building signage whether the signs will be illuminated and state types of illumination. Drawings of the signage shall comply with the applicable regulations specified in the Sign Code (Chapter 21 of the Land Development Regulations). 7. Add to the site plan drawing a labeled symbol that represents the location of the site lighting poles. Also, note on the site plan that the site lighting fixtures will illlUllinate the site consistent with the specifications identified in the Parking Lot Code. A photometric plan is reviewed at time of permit review and is not required for site plan review. Therefore, remove the drawing from the submittal. MEH:bg J:\SHRDATA\Development\Building-6870\Documents\TRC\NWSP 99-009 1st review Sterling Records Management.doc Parks Division Memorandum- TRC Subject: Mike Rumpf, Acting Planning and Zoning Manager ~ Kevin J Hallahan, Forester I Environmentalist tL-}1A Sterling Records Management New Site Plan - 1st Review To: From: Date: May 21,1999 I have no comments on the above project. The project should continue in the normal review process. .-'- /-04 MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 99 - 161 TO: Mike Rumpf, Planning Director FROM: John A. Guidry, Utilities DireclOr DATE: May 25, 1999 SUBJECT: Sterling Records Management - New Site Plan - I" review We offer the following commenls on this project: GENERAL COMMENTS I) All utilities easements shall be shown on the rectified landscaping drawings so that we may delermine which trees may interfere with utililies. In general, palm lrees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. LDR Sec. 7.5-18.1 gives public utililies the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utilily services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 2) Dept. of HRS permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project. (Sec. 26-12) 3) Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1500 g.p.m. as stated in LDR chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater. (see Sec. 26-16(a)). Please submit these calculations with your HRS permit submittal. 4) Sec. 26-34(E) of the City Code requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon my request for signature on the Health Dept. application forms or within 30 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be $4213.44, based upon two, 2-inch meters. 5) Comp Plan policy 3C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available. 6) Provide an engineer's written certification that drainage will conform with all rules of the City and the South Florida Water Management District. (LDR Chap. 4, sec. 7F). SPECIFIC CONDITIONS I) Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in Sec. 26-33(a) of the Code. 2) This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utililies, on condition thai the systems be fully completed, and given to the City before the first permanent meter is set. Note thai setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the certificate of occupancy. 3) Appropriate backflow prevenlers may be required on the domestic water service to the building, depending upon intended use, in accordance with Sec. 26-207. 4) A building permit for this project shall nol be issued until this office has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to serve the project. (Sec. 26-15) 5) Provide drainage calculations showing the amount of rainfall to be retained on-site. Also indicate the poinl of positive discharge from the site to a receiving water body. 6) The waste stream from the manufacturing process must meet the City's pretreatment requirements. A sampling point must be provided to allow monitoring of this wasle stream. (Sec. 26-143, 26-147) Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella (742-6404) of this office. JAG/PVM lo~ in! du MAY ? 4 Xc: Skip Milor Peter Mazzella File PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #99-110 TO: Michael W. Rumpf, Director Planning & Zoni~ Larry Quinn, Assistant Public Works Directot..&' FROM: SUBJ: 1 st Review - New Site Plan - Sterling Records - NWSP 99-009 DATE: Jillle 3, 1999 The Public Works Department finds the dumpster location to be illlacceptable at the above mentioned site. Code chapter 10, Sec. 10-25, A-2 requires the Solid Waste Division to have free and clear access to all dumpsters. The enclosure shown on the plans needs to be rotated to allow access. LQlcr rn ~&~UW~Jn1 J.IN 3 /9S9 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. o o ~ OLD BOYNTON ROAD \ BOYNfON BEACH BOULEY ARD 0 0 ") '" ~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ '" g ~ 5: 0 " ~ ~ ~ '" ~ '" 'i ~ ~ Ii! :>: 0 ~ u ~ ~ WOOLBRIGHT ROAD 6LD 2L 317980 2L 98050 47500 113160 14300 29570 14300 9120 4420 10520 1330 1330 GOLF ROAD (SW 23rd AVENUE) ~ 6LD 333490 47500 31010 4420 JS1TE SW3StbAVENU( 6LD 25882C 47500 2L 24070 20555 F 4420 14300 4LD 1912F 16124C LEGEND 1330 3"00 1500C 6LO - ROADWAY LANES LAKE IDA ROAD 2890 25882 C . DAILY TRAFFIC AND l 31'00 - DAilY ADOPTED SERVICE VOLUME 6LD 2407 C - PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 29908 0 2890 . PEAK HOURADOPTE 47500 SERVICE VOlUME 27810 4420 STERLING RECORDS MANAGEMENT EXHIBIT 2 EXISTING (1998) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS N.T.5. ~ OS ANO LOS o 7/1/99 ~ #PTC99-74 7/2/99 tripgen2 Page 1 of 1 Management 3 Sterling Records Trip Generation Exhibit Dailv Pass-by Land Use Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips Trips (1) New Trips Warehouse 149,150 SF 4.88 /1,000 SF 728 36 5% 692 TOTAL 149,150 SF 728 36 692 AM Peak Hour Total Trips Pass-by New Trips Land Use I ntens ity Trip Generation Rate (2) In Out Total Trips (1) In Out Total Warehouse 149,150 SF Ln (T)=0.707Ln(X)+ 1.148 (82/18) 89 19 108 5 5% 85 18 103 TOTAL 149,150 SF 89 19 108 5 85 18 103 PM Peak Hour Total Trips Pass-by New Trips Land Use Intensity Trip Generation Rate (2) In Out Total Trips (1) In Out Total Warehouse 149,150 SF Ln (T)=O.754Ln(X)+O.826 (24/76) 24 75 99 5 5% 23 71 94 TOTAL 149,150 SF 24 75 99 5 23 71 94 (1) Source: Section 10.8, Fair Share Road Impact Fees, of the Palm Beach County Unified land Development Code. (2) Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trio Generation, 6th Edition. o ~ OLD BOYNTON ROAD \ BOYNTON BEACH BOULEY ARO 0 0 => ~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ 3: 0 ;;, :(J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 ill " ~ 0 ~ u ~ WOOlBRIGHT ROAD 55% 5% 5% 381 35 57 35 5 52 5 5 0.8% 5 0.2% 0.2% GOLF ROAD (SW 23rd AVENUE) 65% 450 67 61 0.95% JS1TE SW3SIhAV<NU[ 35% 242 36 33 0.5% 5% 35 2% 5 14 5 2 LEGEND 0.2% 2 0.1% 65% - PERCENT OISTRIBU LAKE IDA ROAD / 450 . DAilY PROJECT TRA 28% 67 - AM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TAAFFIC 194 61 - PM PEAK HOUR 29 PROJECT TRAFFIC 26 0.95% - %OF DAILY AOOPT 0.4% SERVICE VOlUME STERLING RECORDS MANAGEMENT EXHIBIT 4 PROIEG TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT o N.T.S. ~ liON FFlC ED 7/1/99 ~ Exhibit 5 Sterling Records Management Historic Growth #PTC99-74 growth 7/2199 Page 1 of 1 Daily Traffic Volumes Crowth Roadway 1995 1998 Rate Congress Avenue North of Golf Road 28,580 31,489 2.81% /Year South of Golf Road 26,669 33,349 7.74% /Year North of lake Ida Road 22,070 25,882 5.45% /Year