REVIEW COMMENTS
;4:xt:1~
7Iv/ ~-M
M E M 0 RAN DUM
To: Jim Golden
Senior City Planner
May 29, 1990
Via: Timothy Cannon
Interim Director of Planning
From: Vincent A. Finizio
Acting Assistant to the City Engineer
Re; Target Commercial Center - Planning Department Memo of Inquiry
Why is the Preliminary Plat on the TRB Agenda?
In response to your most recent memorandum regarding the above
referenced plat, please be advised that the applicant has been
directed by this office to provide me with a written request
seeking permission of this city Department to consider the
applicant's most recent plan submittal as a pre-application process
simultaneous with the master plan process and in conjunction with
preliminary plat, as the site plan for the Target Commercial Center
has already received site plan approval from the planning and
Zoning Board and the city Commission (planning Department Agenda
Item) .
Requiring the applicant to proceed through the preapplication and
master plan process prior to allowing the review of the preliminary
plat at this late a stage, will ultimately place an undue hardship
upon the applicant in the form of an inordinate and lengthy time
interval relative to duplicating plan review efforts that occurred
during the site plan l'eview process. Should you require any
addi tional information regarding the effects of reviewing 6i te
plans prior to platting please feel free to contact me at ext. 487.
Thank you.
(\.. -- - :-\:-A :-I:.'
Vincent A. Finizio
6 - -
cc:
J. Scott Miller"/
City Manager
RECEIVED
MAY 30 1990
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
)?-~
~} ~
4d7~
MEMORANDUM
TO: Vincent A. Finizio
Acting Asst. to City Engineer
THRU: Timothy P. Cannon "'--V
Interim Planning Director { ~
FROM: James J. Golden
Senior City Planner
SUBJECT: Target Shoppinq Center
With respect to the above, why is the preliminary plat being
placed on the Technical Review Board agenda when the
pre-application and master plan have not yet been submitted for
review and approval by the Technical Review Board and the
Planning and Zoning Board?
~t./~
ES t. GOLDEN
"
JJG:frb
cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
RECEIVED
RECEIVED
MAY 30 1990
ell Y MANAGER'S OFFICE
MAY 30 1990
c'
...,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
Planning Depa~t.ent
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
FAX NUMBER (407) 738-7459
OFFICE NUMBER (407) 738-7490
FAX TRANSMITTAL COVER LETTER
.
Date:
7-B-teJ
Time:
To:
Fax Number Transmitting To:
Number of
es Transmitted (including cover letter):
From:
7
/
~-
I
~~
/.. if ,. " (' i.
,,' ,:~ 11' -(... '" "~~'-vv, ~~",...,i ~ i I. Cl; ;;1',,1 ',_, ( ./' v....A i....i' '';'~ .,..... ~.t-'I.r
,I: " ' 'I '!, ,: ,
~........; ,., -~;j- I_i ..;. ,--1 ',. i . '- ; ," _, c...1 ., ;,' ~.,'_ ",,,
., " , -, -- ," ': ' I.' ~ , /" '/
, -
........ ! I '
! I _ _:' j,' , ~ ' " ~,.-<o i~; -<- "/ ,,\ ; '- , ,""" .J
, - I'
,\ ;......
i " I , '.~
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
~ Mailing:
~ Telephone:
Pose Office Box 310
Boyneon Beach. Fl 33425-0310
(407) 738-7487
100 E. Boyneon Beach Blvd.
Boyneon Beach. Fl 33435
OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER
Mr. Andrew Hertel
Palm Beach County Traffic Division
Post Office Box 2429
West Palm Beach, Florida 33402-2429
June 29, 1'990
(Hand-Delivered)
Re: Final plat Submission for "Target Commercial Center"
Congress Avenue at N.W. 22nd Avenue
Boynton Beach, Florida
Dear Mr. Hertel:
Attached for your review and consideration is a copy of a plat
submi ttal for the above referenced proj ect. Please review the
plat and notify me if the available rights-of-way is of sufficient
dimension and character to accommodate the construction of required
roadway improvements, as agreed upon by the developer and the
County's Traffic Division. Please contact me at the following
telephone number: (407) 738-7487.
Thank you in advance of your cooperation in this matter.
Very truly yours,
(). ~::L '~cS
Vincent A. Finizio
Administrator of Engineering
cc: Timothy Cannon
Director of Planning
Target File
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 90-260
June 8, 1990
THRU:
Timothy P. Cannon, Interim Planning Director
Don Jaeger, Building & Zoning Director ~
Michael E. Haag, Zoning & Site Development Administrator
TO:
FROM:
RE:
MASTER SITE PLAN - TARGET SHOPPING CENTER
Upon review of the above mentioned project, the following
comments must be addressed in order to conform with Boynton Beach
City Codes:
1. All plans submitted for public record and prepared by a
design professional shall show original raised seal
(legible) and signature of the Florida registered design
professional responsible for the drawings.
2. South Florida Water Management District permit or letter of
exemption is required to establish the building minimum
finish floor elevation.
3. Lake Worth Drainage District permit or letter of exemption
is required.
4. Dimension the width and length of all landscape strips and
islands.
5. Show on the plans parking space computations complying with
the requirements of Section 11 H. of the Zoning Code for
all uses (e.g. retail, restaurants outside storage).
6. Dedicate the outpacel, proposed to be a restaurant and
identify number of seats. Include the required parking
spaces for the restaurant outparcel in your total required
parking space data.
7. Show the elevation drawings of each side of each building,
identifying the exterior finish material and color.
8. The exterior finish material and color must match color and
material shown and identified on the City commission
approved color elevation drawings.
9. Identify the overall height of each building. Show and
identify elevation of roof line.
10. Show handicapped accessibility route from Congress Avenue
and Northwest 22nd Avenue public right-of-way to each
building. Include spot elevation along the path or route.
The handicapped accessibility walkway must comply with the
Accessibility Requirements manual.
11. Show the location of handicapped parking spaces fer the
14,200 square foot retail area and identify location of
handicapped accessible route to store front from
handicapped parking stall.
12. Provide a typical handicapped and regular parking stall
detail drawing, showing the dimensions of both type of
stall. Indicate the appropriate size, color and location
of stall striping for both types of parking spaces. Show
handicapped accessibility to each building and/or tenant
space by showing and identifying the following: location
and height of all handicapped signs, appropriate location,
width, slope and length of handicapped ramp, elevation of
each handicapped parking space and adjacent curb or
Memo: Timothy Cannon
Re: Target Shopping Center
June 8, 1990
Page Two
sidewalk where handicapped ramp is located. Provide spot
elevation along the handicapped accessible path leading to
the entrance door of each building and/or tenant space from
each handicapped parking space. All handicapped code
requirements must comply with the Accessibility Requirement
manual, January 1990 first edition, first printing.
13. Show and identify the location, width, length and elevation
of the level platform required at the entrance to each
building and/or tenant space.
14. Provide a detailed plan view and full section view drawing
of the dumpster enclosure and pads. Identify type, size
and color of material used for the sides of the enclosure.
Identify the overall height, width and length. Identify
the size and type of all required vertical and horizontal
structural material and components for the dumpster
enclosure and pad.
15. Indicate location, type, size and spacing of accent shrub
landscape material required around three (3) sides of the
dumpster.
16. Show the location and identify the type of lawn grass
landscape material.
17. The vehicular use area, as seen from the south property
line, requires a visual screen barrier (preferably) hedge
material. Identify appropriate location, type, size and
spacing of required screening material.
18. Provide a detail section drawing of buffer wall. Identify
the size and location of the types of building material and
structural components for the wall and wall foundation.
Identify location, type and color of finish material
proposed for the buffer wall. Include on the section
drawing the location of the property line (min. 2' from any
property line to the wall). Also, show and identify, on
plan view drawing, the location of buffer wall two feet
(2') in from all property lines.
19. Show location of all signs and/or signage, including
directional signs and building and/or tenant advertisement
signage.
20. Show unobstructed cross visibility area and space through
the required site perimeter landscape strip at both sides
of all ingress and egress driveways. The cross visibility
area and space is shown by placing and dimensioning, on the
site landscape plan drawing, a ten foot (10') isosceles
right angle triangle with the right angle on the property
line at the edge of the driveway and landscape strip and
completing the remainder of the triangle into unobstructed
landscaping stating that the vertical space within this area
is clear of landscape material between thirty inches (30")
and six feet (6').
21. Show unobstructed cross Visibility area and space through
the required site perimeter landscaping at the corner of
the property (where two adjacent public rights-of-way
intersect). The cross visibility area and space is shown
by placing and dimensioning, on the site landscape plan
drawing, a thirty-five foot (35') isosceles triangle at the
corner of the property line where the intersection is
located and completing the remainder of the triangle into
unobstructed landscaping, stating that the vertical space
within this area is clear of landscape material between
thirty inches (30') and six feet (6').
Memo: Timothy Cannon
Re: Target Shopping Center
June 8, 1990
Page Three
22. Provide statement that lighting pole structures will meet
the requirements of the Standard Building Code, 1988
edition, Chapter 12.
23. Identify and show the appropriate percentage of required
native landscape material.
24. Identify on site lighting plan that site lighting is
photocell activated.
25. Provide photometries for site lighting for the entire site
(light levels must comply with the requirements of the
"City Engineering Department Standard for Parking Lots").
26. Provide a detailed drawing of site lighting pole and
structural base.
In order to facilitate the permitting process, the following
information should be included within your documents submitted to
the Building Department for required permits:
1. All signage must comply with Boynton Beach Sign Ordinance
and/or approved sign program.
2. Secure approval from Boynton Beach Utility Department and
other utility companies, including Florida Power & Light,
for location and type of trees planted within utility
easement areas bordering a public right-of-way.
meh:eaf
TRGTSHOP.SDD
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Brian J. La Moffet
Jose Aguila
FROM:
James J. Golden
Senior City Planner
DATE:
June 11, 1990
SUBJECT: Target Shopping Center - Comments related to
Construction Plans for preliminary Plat and Revisions
to Approved Site Plan
with respect to the attached comments dated February 7, 1990,
please be advised of the following:
1. Loading zone adjacent to 8,740 square foot outparcel cannot
encroach access aisle (Section II.J.l of Appendix A-Zoning).
2. Closing the two access aisle connections as outlined at the
Technical Review Board meeting will resolve this comment.
3. To be addressed at sign-off.
4. To be addressed at sign-off.
5. Engineering Department has indicated that this problem has
been resolved to their satisfaction.
6. To be addressed at sign-off.
7. For future reference.
8. Being addressed.
9. Not addressed.
10. Rezoning approved.
11. Not addressed.
12. To be coordinated with and signed-off by
Forester/Horticulturist.
13. Not addressed.
14. Addressed.
15. Addressed.
16. Comment is no longer relevant.
17. N/A
18. N/A
19. N/A
20. Assurance of programmed roadway improvements must be
provided prior to the issuance of a building permit
(sign-off).
21. N/A
22. N/A.
23. Recommendation only.
24. Not addressed. Preliminary Plat approval requires that you
provide construction drawings for all required roadway
improvements that are to be undertaken by the developer.
(Article VIII, Section S.B.l of Appendix C-Subdivisions,
Platting) .
~ i- )J.ii
(tAMES ,. GOLDEN
JJG:cp
MEMORANDUM
(
THR~':
Chairman and Members
Pl~nning and Zoning Board
Timothy P. Cannon r-t
Interim Planning Director
TO:
FROM: James J. Golden
Senior City Planner
DATE: February 7, 1990
SUBJECT: Target Shoppinq Center - Site Plan - File No. 411
If it is the decision of the Planning and Zoning Board to
recommend approval or the City Commission to approve this
application, compliance with the following conditions is
necessary for consistency with the City'S Code of Ordinances and
Comprehensive Plan:
1. Loading zones have not been provided to serve outparcels
(section 11.J of Appendix A-Zoning).
2. The design of the internal intersections at the southeast
and northwest corners of the Target Store result in poor
traffic flow and turning movements and create potentially
hazardous situations. In addition, there is a visability
problem at the intersection at the northwest corner of the
Target Store that results from the design of the outparcel
at this location. Vehicles turning left on the south side
of the outparcel cannot see around the corner of the
building. It is strongly recommended that the site be
redesigned in these two areas to eliminate these problems
(Objective 2.5 of the Comprehensive Plan).
3. Exterior mechanical equipment at the rear of the shopping
center should have proper screening and noise mitigation
incorporated in the design of the center (Policy 1.17.7 of
the Comprehensive Plan). A note should be added to the
plans to reflect this requirement.
4. Due to the close proximity at the rear of the shopping center
to the planned unit development, it is recommended that the
rear design of the center be similar to the front design of
the center (Policy 1.17.7 of the Comprehensive Plan).
5. The design of the stormwater drainage system does not
provide for the pre-treatment of the first one-half inch of
stormwater runoff in grassy swales or other landscaped areas
(Policy 1.11.7 and 4.2.9 of the Comprehensive Plan and the
drainage design requirements of Article X-Parking Lots).
Redesign of the on-site drainage system will be required.
6. The color scheme of the shopping center has not been
indicated on the blueprint elevations (see item *14 on site
plan application check list).
--
7. Typical floor plans and elevations have not been submitted
for outparcel buildings. Therefore, a site plan
modification will be required for the outparcel buildings
(Section 19-18 of the Code of Ordinances).
8. Platting is required pursuant to Objective 1.20 of the
Comprehensive Plan, as the portion of the original Congress
Lakes planned unit development which lies south of N.W. 22nd
Avenue has been divided into more than 3 parcels since 1978.
9. Lighting pOles should not encroach parking spaces and should
be relocated to landscaped islands (Section 5-142(i)(2) of
Article X-Parking Lots).
I
TO: Chairman and Members, Planning and Zoning Board
SUBJECT: Target Shopping Center - site Plan - File No. 411
February 7, 1990, Page 2
10. Approval of the site plan is contingent upon approval of the
rezoning to c-3.
11. Review of the developer I s traffic impact analysis is based
on a maximum 140,000 square foot shopping center. The
square footage proposed on the site plan is 142,500 square
feet. The square footage of the shopping center must be
reduced by 2,500 square feet to comply with the square
footage anticipated in the traffic report submitted by
Kimley-Horn.
12. The adjacent medians on Congress Avenue and N.W. 22nd Avenue
should be landscaped in accordance with POlicy 2.9.4 of the
Comprehensive Plan.
13. Turn lane improvements recommended by Kimley-Horn for the
project driveway onto N.W. 22nd Avenue have not been
incorporated into the set of plans. These improvements must
be shown on all of the site drawings at the time of sign-off.
14. The additional right turn-in/right turn-out driveway onto
N.W. 22nd Avenue should be removed from the plans, as this
driveway has not been included in the Kimley-Horn traffic
analysis.
15. Restaurant floor area should be indicated on the site plan,
including the maximum seating proposed, to determine the
specific number of parking spaces required.
16. The orientation of the shopping center to the intersection
is significantly different than that which exists at the
southeast (Motorola) and northwest (Mahogany Bay) corners
and that proposed at the northeast corner (Shoppes of
Boynton). The visual impact of rh~ ~~Q~osed design with
respect to the other corners at this intersection should be
taken into consideration.
(With respect to 17.-19. below, see attached excerpts from the
Future Land Use Element Support Documents in Exhibit nAn).
17. Since this is a commercial proj ect, no residents would be
added as a reRult of the construction of the project.
Therefore, parks and recreations facilities would not be
needed and the levels of service for these facilities would
not be affected.
18. Sanitary sewer capacity is available for the project,
consistent with the adopted level of service, as evidenced
by the analysis un pages 9-10 of the Future Land Use Element
Support Documents.
19. Drainage and solid waste facilities are available for the
project, consistent with the adopted level of service, as
evidenced by the analysis on pages 11-13 of the Future Land
Use Element Support Documents.
TO: Chairman and Members, Planning and Zoning Board
SUBJECT: Target Shopping Center - Site Plan - File No. 411
. February 7, 1990, Page 3
20. Roadway Improvements
The following roadway improvements are required:
o Site Access on N.W. 22nd Avenue
Northbound through/left-turn lane
separate northbound right-turn lane
N.W. 22nd Avenue and Congress Avenue
Separate northbound right-turn lane
Second northbound left-turn lane by restriping
Separate southbound right-turn lane
Separate eastbound right-turn lane
Second westbound through lane
o Hypoluxo Road and Congress Avenue
Second westbound left-turn lane
o Six-laning of Congress Avenue from Hypoluxo Road to Boynton
Beach Boulevard.
o Six-Ianing of Boynton Beach Boulevard from Old Boynton Road
to 1-95.
Based on Palm Beach County standards, assurance of roadway
improvement would require the project to be scheduled for
construction in the County Transportation Improvement Program,
the State Five Year Work Program or part of a Municipal Capital
Improvement Program. The project may also be considered assured
if it is part of a developer agreement and has been secured
through bonding with the City or county.
In order to meet City requirements, the Applicant should provide
an analysis of impacts to N.W. 22nd Avenue, support the
historical traffic growth rates and provide the City with
assurance of improvements. If the applicant provides information
acceptable to the City, the project may be approved but may not
commence until such time as construction of required roadway
improvements has been assured, meaning that a building permit
cannot be issued for the proposed shopping center until the
roadway improvements listed above have either been included in
the State, County, or City transportation improvements program,
or have been bonded or are under contract.
Pursuant to policy 2.6.2 of the Comprehensive Plan, the City can
recommend to Palm Beach County that the developer's road impact
fee payment be credited toward any of the roadway improvements
listed above, subject to approval by Palm Beach County.
The traffic analysis submitted by the developer was reviewed by
Walter H. Keller, Jr., Inc., the City's traffic consultant, to
determine consistency with the 1989 City of Boynton Beach Compre-
hensive Plan (Ordinance 89-39) and section 9.c.4.h(5} of Appendix
A-Zoning. A copy of Mr. Keller's report can be found in Exhibit
"B" of this memorandum.
21. Potable Water
since the proposed project would consist of commercial uses and
would not bring additional residents into the City, construction
of the project would not affect the adopted Level of ServiC'e
/To-)
,- ~ ..
TO: Chairman and Members, Planning and Zoning Board
SUBJECT: Target Shopping Center - Site Plan - File No. 411
February 7, 1990, Page 4
However, connection to the City's water system may be prohibited
by DER, through the County Health Department, under the regula-
tions administered by those agencies. Furthermore, since it is
very likely that the level of service for water is not currently
being met, it is possible that vesting of this project with
respect to this LOS may be a potential problem, if construction
does not begin immediately. The City Commission will need to
adopt a concurrency management ordinance by June 1, 1990. This
ordinance will need to include specific rules for determining
whether a project is vested.
22. All of the statements w~i-::h have been made in items 17.
through 21. concerning availability of public facilities
will be subject to the vesting rules which will be
incorporated into the concurrency management regulations
that the City must adopt by June 1, 1990.
In addition to the requirements necessary pursuant. r.:- tho Cude
and Comprehensive Plan, the following recommendations should also
be considered:
23. Additional bUffering should be required between the Shopping
center and the planned unit development through the use of
natural features such as lakes, dense landscaping,
architectural treatment to rear building elevations,
screening of exterior mechanical equipment, and mitigation
of noise generated by exterior mechanical equipment.
24. The applicant should be required to construct the addi-
tional median/turn lane improvements outlined in items no. 5
and 7 of the correspondence from the Palm Beach County
Tr"f~iL: Division that appears in Exhibit "c" of this
memorandum.
~l~
ES p. GOLDEN
JJG:frb
Encs
Targetsp
PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM NO. 90-077
TO: JAMES GOLDEN - SENIOR CITY PLANNER
FROM: ROBERT EICHORST - PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
SUBJ: TARGET PRELIMINARY PLAT
Dumpster and/or compactor details of enclosure and site must
be supplied.
~-25/
Ro ert Eichorst
R.ECEIVED
JUN 7 1990
PLANNING DEPT.
-
~
RE:he
cc: file
EN:::INEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 90-163
To: J. S=tt Miller
City Manager
June 2, 1990
Fran: Vincent A. Finizio
Acting Assistant to the City Engineer
Re: Technical Review Board Carments
Target Cannercial Center
Site Plan and Preliminary Plat
The applicant for the above referenced project shall sutmit the following
information, technical data and plan revisions, in ac=rdance with the re-
quirerrents of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, Code of Ordinances, Chapter
19, Section 19-17, "Plan Required", Section 19-65, "Factors to be considered
by the Technical Review Board", Chapter 5, Article X, Section 5-142, "Required
Improvements" .
PRELIMINARY PLAT
Since the Traffic Inpact Analysis for Target Corrmercial Center was sutmitted
in conjunction with the review of the site plan which preceeded sutmittal for
preliminary plat, the applicant will not have to provide a =rent (new) T.I.A.
conditioned upon the applicant sutmitting a plan depicting' the =nstruction of
the full intersection, located at Northwest 22nd Avenue along Congress Avenue.
Said plans must meet with the approval of the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineer-
ing Departrrent in accordance with the guidelines set forth within the County's
Traffic Perfonnance Standards and the associated Municipal Ordinance as agreed
upon during the May 23, 1990 meeting with the applicant's engineer, Charles
Walker Jr., Assistant County Engineer, Enri= Rossi of Rossi Malavasi Engineers
Inc., Timothy Cannon, City of Boynton Beach Interim Director of Planning, Ted
Powell of the VIM Group and myself. The applicant shall assure the construction
of those roadway improvements located west of the 1; of Congress Avenue. Sec. 4C II.
Sutmit monies payable to the City of Boynton Beach, Florida in the amount of
Two thousand six hundred and ninty six dollars ($2,969.00) for the installation
of street lights (qty. of seven) along Northwest 22nd Avenue. F.P.L. lighting
plan shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to authorizing the
installation of said lights. Section 5B (1) (d), " Required Street Lighting"
Developrrent plans suJ:mitted with the preliminary plat docurrents shall provide for
a site plan sheet that will also be titled "Master Plan", iril response to the request
for this sutmittal to be =nsidered a Master Plan in conjunction with the platting
process.
Provide landscaping plans for plantings within the public rights-of-way for NW
22nd Avenue and Congress Avenue. The applicant will sutmit a formal agreerrent
to faithfully and diligently obtain the necessary ROW permits for said install-
ation. Should therebe no available ROW to landscape, the applicant shall agree
to provide and install landscaping at areas so designated by the City Forester
in an amount equal to the =st of installing landscaping should there have been
suitable area abutting all Target property boundaries. Appendix "C", Subdivision
and Platting Regulations, Article VIII, Section 5B (1), "Required Landscaping of
Public Rights-of-Way".
Developrent plans sul:.:mitted with the preliminary plat shall =ntain the nanes of
the professional project planner, engineer, surveyor and developer including
addresses and telephone mnnbers (ie Arrerican Developrent Inc. address? tel no?)
Section 4. "Master Plan" Section 4C (4).
Identify zoning classification upon the front title sheet of the Developrent
plans. Section 4C 16, "Zoning Classification"
Sul:.:mit proper surety for all required improvements, including all off-site
roadway improvements as directed and approved by the City of Boynton Beach in
conjunction with the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineers. Surety shall equal
one hundred and ten percent (110%) of the total costs for the construction of all
approved plan canponents. An additional two percent (2%) admiiDslt,rel(lT'tmn
shall be rrade payable to the City utilizing one hundred percenttM%}-'df-'p~~<IliI
=sts. Section 6A and Section 7. 2., "Surety".
end page 1 of 2
JUN 4 1990
PLANNII~G DEPT.
'"
ENGINEERIN0 DEPAR'IMENT MEMCRANDUM NO. 90-163 cont'd
June 2, 1990
"TARGET' e<::M>1ERCIAL CENIER"
Provide an executed "Unified Control" document that meets with the approval
of the City Attorney. Appendix "A", Section 6F. 3. "Unified Control" including
Section 6F. 8. (a) (1) "Legal Docurrents Assuring Unified Control".
Off-Site Landscaping shall be considered a required improverrent and shall there-
fore be assured with proper surety. Article VIII, Section 58 (1) (d) "landscaping".
The "Developer's Engineer" shall sign, seal and date all opinions of cost.
Article VIII, Section 58 (4) "Certified Cost Estirrates"
The off-site improvements to Hypoluxo Road shall be considered a required
improverrent and therefore shall be assured with surety in an arrount equal to
the certified "opinion of costs".
South Florida Water Managerrent District and Palm Beach County permits required.
Appendix "C", Article VIII, Section 58 (3) (a) "Requisite Goverrurental Agencies".
Place note on developrent plan sheet no. 3 of 8 that states traffic control
devices shall be utilized for all construction within the rights-of-way, in
accordance with the Federal Manual of Unifonn Traffic Control Devices MUTCD
and Palm Beach County permit conditions. Section 19-17 (k) teclmical , Section
4N " Performance Standards" and Section 19-21 "Factors considered by Ccmnittee
in Review", 19-21 (a), "autarotive and pedestrian safety, traffic flow and control"
SITE PLAN
Submit a parking facility lighting plan that complies with Chapter 5, Article X,
Boynton Beach Parking Lot Regulations, Section 5-142 (g) "Lighting Standards"
Facility lighting shall be photo-cell activated.
Submit a photaretric plan indicating horizontal illtnnination levels within
the parking facility. There shall be a rraintained one foot candle level of
illtnnination within the entire facility which shall include driveways, aisles
and other paved surfaces that serve said facility.
Provide a tabulation for the quantity of fill (silica sand) to te imported for
the construction of the site. Section 58,2, d, "S1.lITlt1aIY of quantities".
Landscaping plans shall provide for the redeveloprent of sodded swales which are
to be fully irrigated, within the public rights-of-way for NW 22nd Avenue and
Congress Avenue.
Provide dirrension for the parking lot construction. DillEnsions shall be placed
upon the paving and drainage plan. Section 5-142 (g) "Construction Standards".
Place internal directional arrows upon the paving and drainage plan to indicate
traffic circulation and flow. Section 5-142 (c) "Traffic Control" and Section
19-17 (e) "internal circulation patterns".
Provide parking stall details for standard and handicap stalls. Handicap stall
striping shall canply with the latest edition of the Depart:rrent of Comnunity
Affairs, Accessibility Requirerrents. Section 5-142 (k) "Handicap Requirerrents".
Provide "Fire Lanes" that comply with Section 5-142 (g) "Fire Lane Standards" and
Section 5-142 (m), "Fire Lanes".
Provide drainage calculations.
Section 5-142 (f), " Required drainage calculations".
Respectfully submitted,
( J :_.."--:-i- ~-::Q. 0-
Vincent Anthony Fin\~to
Jim Golden, Senior City Plarmer ,/
Timothy Carmon, Interim Director of Plarming
cc:
Ivaf
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #90-297
TO:
Timothy Cannon, Interim Planning Director I ~
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Horticulturist ~ r~
Target Shopping Center - Site Plan
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
June 6, 19909
1. The applicant must prepare landscape and irrigation plans
for Congress Avenue and NW 22nd Avenue in accordance with
the Policy and Procedure Manual (attached).
2.
The native percentages of plant materials should be computed
for the total quantities used for the site.
3.
The road R.O.W.'s for Congress Avenue and NW 22nd Avenue
should be sodded and irrigated.
RE,CEIVEP
KJH:ad
JI.I" \i 1900
PLANNING DEPT.
-
-
MEMORANDUM
Utilities #90-364
TO: Timothy Cannon
Acting Planning Direc~tor -
FROM: John A. Guidry
Director of utilities
DATE: June 6, 1990
SUBJECT: TRB Review - Target Shopping Center Site Plan
Previous memo #90-086, dated February 7, 1990, listed conditions
of approval, of which the following have not yet been met to our
satisfaction.
1. show the location of the existing 16" sewage force main
along Congress Avenue.
2. Add gate valves on all hydrant lines over 20' long and near
the hydrant located on the north side of the Target
building.
6. shorten water services to the out parcels and retail stores
to a maximum of 60' in length by re-aligning the water mains
and placing meters in landscaped areas.
7. Show all utility easements. Large trees are not permitted
within easements.
9. Provide calculations on the site's anticipated domestic
water demand.
15. Rectify the apparent conflict between sanitary sewer
services and storm drainage for the out parcels on the east
side of the site.
17. Please provide a construction schedule that indicates when
potable water capacity will be needed, so as to allow this
department to make a determination that reserve capacity
will/will not be available for the project.
Review of the current generation plans has prompted the following
comments:
1A. Short body fitting not allowed.
,
Timothy Cannon
Page 2
June 6, 1990
Memorandum #90-364
2A.
Add note "All work to be in accordance
Boynton Beach Detail specifications."
20, page 3/8 not in accordance.
with current City of
Note: eXisting note
3A. show 8" force main along N.W. 22nd Avenue.
4A. Utility easement must include fire hydrants and meters.
SA. Dumpster enclosures are not allowed in utility easements.
Shift water main to avoid this.
None of these conditions or comments are difficult to accomplish.
However, we do suggest that the developer meet with our staff
prior to final sign-off to verify compliance to our satisfaction.
dmt
bc: Mike Kazunas
,
MEMORANDUM
POLICE 11 90-073
TO:
Mr. James Golden
FROM:
Lt. Dale Hammack
RE:
Target
DATE:
June 6, 1990
As per our discussion at the Technical Review Board meeting of
5 June 1990, I am recommending the following:
1. Internal traffic control.
2. Parking isles backing into through aisles.
3. comply with Building security Code (5-8G).
4. No Stopping, Standing, and parking.
~OdJ~
L . Dale Hammack
DH/cm
RECEIVED
JUN '1 1990
PLANNING DEPT.
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 90-256
June 8, 1990
THRU:
Timothy P. Cannon, Interim Planning Director
Don Jaeger, Building & Zoning Director~
Michael E. Haag, Zoning & Site Develop~nt Administrator
TO:
FROM:
RE:
PRELIMINARY PLAT - TARGET COMMERCIAL CENTER
Please include the following statements in the note section of
the plat documents:
1. Building setbacks shall be as required by the City of
Boynton Beach zoning code. There shall be no buildings and
any kind of construction, or trees or shrubs placed on
drainage or utility easements (water and sewer).
2. Landscaping on other utility easements shall be allowed
only after consent of all utility companies that have
access right to use the easement.
meh:eaf
TARGET.SDD
T !t l~ (. E T ;;')1- u f'E-d:,./'l~, (' c: )/ T L~ /\,
( 0 S - ""'"k,':;> -,..- AI'
-.J -f-'i..-L
fuR:
;)v IT ~!; I~ (T r e' Iv f/itX'v ~i:J1 r}/w
.J
f"'--l._-"-;-r:--
..../--/""., \ I ~ :"
l \"-r i ;....- j/
L( r j.::,' (
Jr ~- \.. /<.- ~-
,- I ('-' v - I '
I '-/t 1_," j~ ..v I (
1_ -- l. ,.. 1...--
/) j- D
",--u
~
>
(c- \.-.: j'v r /'
J
T/:..Jc:: Ftc
,C {C" \.,'\..
", '
~'l/'-(
,..- Iv
I ..t.o
.A'- /;(I-./:
C) r~ 'iA-l'~'_c T
( ,;~ _' "') - j, j' \, ,,' ;" - ,\
T ?L ;i/~\) c-'t /1fJ,]CLffjI.L:,'1I . /\~F(pocri-c-I..!.~G.::' Vi 1-- -Lt~
re c~)
;' '../ ".: '---
- \1"1 (' \tv\' (/
., ,I (
( ! "
, ..Y,
l < , J \"i .' &,,",-1' <" ,{ '- C k.
_' i
., '" ( '_c ^ , \" t7 ( ( JS C;' , ,
- ,
): ~ )
/
- CO' \,,-< , V~J
,
! q;"7 \L rf J. ." j 1\
rev! I l t..} T- r /,' /t j.J
I r- ~r I! " (
L )("(-rd~ /10 j,j ! 0'
I
-I.
('rfV1l.A,., I .)
1',{ I
1- At '. 1 " "J. X
.1.
,2,
(
1:> \
I I, \.1
Iv"'. _~
i
.> f
I(
,3 "f.. < ).
L
I
,~ CO
t
+--
(.{ J
J 'J VI
1i
"2
J'
1.,
(
\, ~
,Jll., 1 <
~ "
" T H
(
- c t f
~
10 C "
" {'
(,
I'
",,' ",,' -,'
( ~ , cl,<
i
i
fIJC.
C;;' ,
~
.J.-- '\'
(' f
lc 1-: );, ~~,
r , +
-----+-~ .-'- -*-
Ct.. \.I>{.,- '(. )- / -t1~' 1~--~'-_k:'vLI._o::''-
t
I..,
f "
LI
~ I r
-,
L
F (A ,I '~\ ~ '--
y,
Air J.i
, ii"
"0"\ _x '~~. _~ S ,,' I
I
j'"", "/
[
cJ'
tt}J,,1.\....-,(-..~I('
\..,.- ("? .(
J.
,/ ''-t' \.-,
, ""\ ^
Y <'/""./-0 . '
( "~ j i l.- I
,
\,j\.-' ' f.. Ie i V i...'
(7 ~ ' V )
, '
:1 ~
!-.(
r,'CC
' [
j \[.~
V
,
(l v, .,..,..\ ,
; v
1
/ i.",,,,,, \-. ~I" ,-,,\ (
I ( ," - ...
'\..'
\1\ t "I.
I
(
',"
I ~
1--
V\,,-; .
^
(
v'\_I~ I
t < ~
(
1 v
--".
I
"'-f Vl
-) \(
,
;"-7
,,1. ;,
"
c.<...J.
7'
. I
c/'
~ ,
/r:.-
"'7'
'7 ~-, --" -L
I! ' ...l- v' I (.
,/
1"6 ,
I
i
I 4 ,
-vi,.\
(
\.- tV ,1. -+
,
I~ {
,
(
X
'Q"
r
,~ ..... t
~ ( /'
~ <}
I
-j
7-
J
T
-' ..."
(;.,.
F <J-
Ail!
;1 jf
Tv C , I
c~.., c i.. ~/ , v 1 ~,
i
,ro I... . l-
.' . ,
. ,1 ^ )
fie I
~ <cyjc",s,' :
,.
'"
,
i
,
'1
,.(" .;
jJ l' .', i
,. r'
. (),~j/Yv-,
1\
!I
j
(" ( \~ (.:
t' L
(.
A Ii' (I
./).1 v' \.
r (I,
//
I.- '
I r
i :7 "
,i
I,
r-
I "
, r
I ..,
/."'-.. '
Ii'
! ' ,
/0,
'.
/
4'
"_ Shalloway, Foy,
iilIIIIiiii Rayman & Newell, Inc.
G~ C~CI) Co-p-j ~ ti" ~.\\<:-1
Ll, - co -
May 30, 1990
Mr. vincent Finizio
City of Boynton Beach
Engineering Department
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: TARGET SHOPPING CENTER
AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
SPRN PROJECT '89124
Dear Vince,
On behalf of the owner I hereby request that the plat
and plans submitted to you on May 24, 1990 for preliminary
plat approval be processed as a pre-application with master
plan approval in conjunction with preliminary platting.
Enclosed are two (2) checks as requested. The first
one in the amount of $175.00 made payable to the city of
Boynton Beach for "Subdivision Pre-Application", the second
check in the amount of $400.00 made payable to the City of
Boynton Beach for "Subdivision Master Plan".
If you need, additional information or have any
questions, please feel free to contact me.
As always.,
e:QAf(\o-rrE-
Brian J. LaMotte, P.E.
Associate
BJLjdd
Enclosures
cc: Tom McMurrianjOcean Properties
~~..I c.v~""'E. $../-......1"" A",5<>L.
Engineers. Planners. Surveyors
1201 Belvedere Road, West Palm Beach, Florida 33405
Tel. 400/655-1151 Fax 407/832-9390
Suite 340, 900 East Ocean Blvd., Stuart, Florida 34994
Tel. 4001286-3223 Fax 4001286-8491
SEN7 BY:Xerox Te:ecopier 7020 ; 5-29-90 3:21PM
..
Boynton Bch fax;# 1
BOllrd of COU"')' C:ommi..iuno:r.
Carol j, 1:lm'l"i.l, Ch~irm.n
Kdfl'l1 '1', Morc"o, Vin' Ch.ir
l\u,,1 A. Huh",,"
I~nn Ilnwl1rll
l'M[)I~ I'hillip'
CDunt)' Admlnhtrator
Jin Wlnlen
l)~parHn.nt of Unglneerln~
alld Puhlic W urk,~
TElECOPIER TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET
TRAFFIC DIVISION
fAX NUMBER: (407\ 478-5770
"
TRANSMITTAL DATE: 5~ q / q 0
PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING TELECOPIED MATERIAL TO:
RECEIVER'S HAME: Timdh\/ P. Co....nrlOn
OFFICE NAME: C. i +y t7f' I ]D~ f1 +0 t1 :B-e o.cY,
OFFICE TELEPHONE NUMBER: ( \
OFFICE FAX NUMBER:
f
\
7:>,8
7 '+S 9
.
**.****....****.***......***.....************...................******..******
SENDER'S NAMEI C, K. UJa..! ke r
OFFICE TELEPHONE NUHBER: ( \
.***.***.*.*..*..***.....*...*.**.**********..*.w**~.*.__***************..***
~
TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (including this transmittal cover sheet: r;
PLEASE CALL TO VERIFV RECEIPT OF MATERIAL: YES (1 NO (
NAME OF FAX OPERATOR;
l'An El]\MI Oprartunity . ^rnrmath~~ ^l'llon r:mploYt~r"
ROX 2.29 WEST PALM nF.ACH, Fl.ORIOA H402-2429 (407) 68~.~OOO
- ~._----
SENT BV:Xerox Te1eoopier 7020 5-29-90 3:21PM
Board of County Commi..iollel'll
..
Boynton Boh fax:# 2
Carol J. Elmquist, Chairman
K~rin T. Marcus, Vice Chair
Carol A, Roberts
Ron Howard
Carole Phillip'
Count" Adminilt...to.
j an Winters
Department ()f Engin~cring
and P"bllc Work.
Mil,)' 29. 1990
Timothy p, Cannon
Interim Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
SUB~ECT: NORTHWEST 22ND AVENUE AT CONURESS AVENUE
Dear Mr. Cannon:
I am writing to follow up on our meeting of May 23, 1990 regarding the various
developer obligations for construction at the subject intersection. A summary
of these developments and their respective obligations Is as follows:
Palm Isles. P.U.D. !Unlncoroorated Palm Beach County)
Design and construct two additional lanes on Congress Avenue to complete the six
lane section from Boynton Beach Boulevard to N.W. 22nd Avenue.
Shoooes of Bovnton (Citv of Bovnton Beachl
-Westbound right turn lane
-Eastbound dual left turn lane
-Northbound right/thru lane
-Southbound right/thru lane
-Modifications to the signal
-One additional northbound and southbound thru lane on Congress Avenue from
N.W. 22nd Avenue to Miner Road (to complete the 6 lane section).
Tareet Shaoolne Center (Cltv of Bovnton Beachl
-Northbound right turn lane
-Second northbound left turn lane (by restrlplng)
-Southbound right turn lane
-Eastbound right turn lane
-Second westbound thru lane
'IAn e;'1l,la] Oppot'tunity _ Affil'mativCl Action hlYlploY~l"l'
BOX 2429 WFST PAI.M REACH, flORIDA 13402-2429 (407) ~R4-4000
0. print~d pn 'fI~'1~~""
SENT BY:Xerox Teiecooier 7020 :-29-90 3:22PM
..
Boynton Bch fax:# 3
Timothy P. Cannon
May 24, 1990
Page Two
At our meeting, it was noted that certain of' these required improvements had
overlapping developer commitments,
It wu also noted that eKistlng right of way constraints precluded the
construction of northbound. Bnd southbound right turn hnes. Lastly, it was
pointed out that, while there is no specific developer requirement, dual left
turn lanes, westbound, would be required on Northwest I1l1nd Avenue in order to
provide an acceptable alignment across the intersection.
In an attempt to eliminate confusion resulting from the overlapping conditions,
as well as waste, I mllde the following proposal which should result in some
savings to ellch of the developments involved.
Basically, it is my suggestIon that the intersection be built to provide the
following geometrics, with the construction to be accomplished as a part of the
overall project to six lane Congress Avenue. The Intersection geometries are
as foll ows:
Conaress Avenue
Southbound - 3 thrus, 11 lefts
Northbound - 1 right., 3 thrus. Z lefts
.You will approach Motorola for the right of way necessary to accomplish the
construction of this right turn lane, Quts1de of the third northbound lane. If
Motorola is unwilling to dedicate, this lane could be deleted. (See attached
marked plan.)
Northw~st ZZnd Avenue
Eastbound. 1 right, 2 thrus. 2 lefts
Westbound - 1 right, 2 thrus; 2 lefts
Further, it was suggested that Rossi & Malavasi and Kimley.Horn work together
to establish approximate costs for the construction on Northwest 22nd Avenue.
These estimates are to be based on red 1 ine sketches for the suggested
geometries. It is my suggestion that the involved shopping centers simply fund
the cost of the improvements on N.W. 22nd Avenue on their respective sides of
Congress Avenue.
With this work being Included in the project to widen Congress Avenue, both
projects should realize II savings over what would have been chargad if the
improvements were contracted individually,
SENT BV:Xerox ie!ecooier 7020 5-29-90 3:22PM
..
Boynton Bch fax:# 4
Timothy P. Cannon
May 24, l~~O
Page Three
It was agreed that we would meet again with the same group of people o~ Tuesday,
June 5 at 10:00 in the Traffic Division to discuss the conceptual sketches and
eost estimates. A copy of the plans for Congress Avenue which has been marked
to show the additional r1ght of way to be raquested from Motorola Is attached
for your use.
Your assistance with this matter of mutual interest is gredtly apprec1ated.
Please feel free to contact me if I can be of any help with this.
Sincerely,
charles R. Walker, Jr., P.E.
Director - Traffic Division
CRW:~:;g
Attachment: Plan
cc: JOhn Bendltz, Kimley-Horn & Assoc., Inc.
Enrico Rossi, Rossi & Malavasi
File: Intersections - N.W. 22nd & Congress
SID - Palm Isles P.U.D.
Munic. . Boynton Beach
............
I,
"
"
~
. .... , ....-
,!II",- '
llOyn~on U'" "
~
......
-""'~'"
,_.,."",.....,
I
\
\
\
\
,
,
".'
---'
. ..
.
I
At
I
\
I Kimley.Horn I
CERTIFICATION OF OFF-SITE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
We have developed preliminary engineering plans for the required off.site improvements at
the intersection of Congress Avenue at N.W. 22nd Avenue and Congress Avenue at
Hypoluxo Road associated with the proposed American Development, Inc, project in the
southwest quadrant of Congress Avenue and N,W, 22nd Avenue,
Based on the preliminary engineering performed, we have prepared an opInIon of the
probable cost of these two off-site improvements. The contribution level at the intersection
of Congress Avenue and N,W, 22nd Avenue was negotiated with Palm Beach County,
Breakdown of the probable costs for the intersection of Congress Avenue and Hypoluxo
Road is attached, The cost estimate performed from conceptual designs have been
increased by 10% to reflect adjustment for additional detail. The totals projected for these
two intersections include the following:
Congress Avenue at N.W. 22nd Avenue
$60,000
Congress Avenue at Hypoluxo Road
$180,000
We hereby certify that this opllllOn of probable costs are accurate based upon the best
information available, Additional monies will be bonded if the estimate fer Congress
venue at Hypoluxo Road is revised up following fin~~
0-2\ .qu
John F. Benditz, P,E.
Vice President
J FB:jsl
Florida Registration
Number 35470
--------=------'-_.'---'-----'--'-
4
.1'("
.
."
==
Shalloway, Foy,
Rayman & Newell, Inc.
June 19, 1990
Mr. Pete Maze1la
Boynton Beach utilities Department
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
RE: TARGET SHOPPING CENTER
SFRN PROJECT '89124
Dear Pete,
In a discussion with the developer regarding your
question #17 of the T.R.B. review, they indicated that the
potable water capacity will be needed during the first
quarter of 1991.
Construction is scheduled to begin around mid August
1990.
Sincerely,
'~rl Crlr
~ J. LaMotte, P.E.
Associate
BJL/dd
cc: T. McMurrian
Engineers. Planners. Surveyors
\ 201 Belvedere RO<ld. We~t Palm Beach. Florida 33405
Tel. 407/65"i 1151 f'ax 407/RJ2-9J90
Suite 340, 900 East Ocean Blvd., Stuart, Florida 34994
Te\. 407 /286-3223
TARGET COMMERICAL CENTER
DOMESTIC WATER USE
SFRN PROJECT #89124
JUNE 14, 1990
(Based on Palm Beach County Environmental Control Rule - I)
TARGET STORE 110,000 FT' X 0.1 GAL = 11,000 GAL/DAY
DAY-FT'
RETAIL STORES 14,200 FT' X 0.1 GAL 1,420 GAL/DAY
DAY-FT'
4500 FT' 4,500 FT' X 0.1 GAL = 450 GAL/DAY
(OUT PARCEL) DAY-FT'
4500 FT' 4,500 FT' X 0.1 GAL = 450 GAL/DAY
(OUT PARCEL) DAY-FT'
8750 FT' RESTURANT 300 SEATS X 50 GAL = 15,000 GAL/DAY
(OUT PARCEL) SEAT
TOTAL = 28,320 GAL/DAY
TOTAL ERC's
28,320 GAL X 1 ERC = 81 ERC's
DAY 350 GAL/DAY
MAXIMUM DAY USE
28,320 GAL X 2.0 = 56.640.0 GAL/DAY
DAY
MAXIMUM HOUR
56,640.0 GAL (MAX) X 1 DAY X 1 HOUR = 39.3 GAL/MIN
DAY 24 HR 60 MIN
Brian.J. La otte, P.E.
Florida Reg. No. 41074
,
=: Shalloway, Foy,
Rayman & Newell, Inc.
SFRN PROJECT #89124
DATE: JUNE 20, 1990
TARGET SHOPPING CENTER
REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS (BONDED IMPROVEMENTS)
1.
A)
WATER---------------------------------------$ 83,685.00
B) SANITARY SEWER------------------------------$ 35,890.00
C) EARTHWORK-----------------------------------$185,895.00
D) SIDEWALKS-----------------------------------$ 6,560.00
E) SURVEY--------------------------------------$ 2,500.00
F) CONCRETE BUFFER WALL------------------------$ 14,790.00
G) TRAFFIC CONTROL-----------------------------$ 2,000.00
H) LANDSCAPING---------------------------------$ 21,956.00
$353,276.00
+ 10%
35.327.60
110%
$388,603.60
2. OFFSITE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
(INCLUDES 110% OF TOTAL COSTS)
A) CONGRESS AVENUE AT N.W. 22ND AVENUE---------$ 60,000.00
B) CONGRESS AVENUE AT HYPOLUXO ROAD------------$180.000.00
$240,000.00
TOTAL BOND AMOUNT
$628.603.60
2% ADMINISTRATION FEE
0.02 X (353,276 + 155,777 + 54,545.45) =
$ 11,271.97
USE
$11.272.00
Engineers. Planners. Surveyors
1201 Belvedere Road, West Palm Beach, Florida 33405
Tel, 407/655.1151 Fax 4071832,9390
Suite 340, 900 East Ocean Blvd., Stuart, Florida 34994
TeI,407/286-3223 Fax 407/286-8491
_ Shalloway, Foy,
~ Rayman & Newell, Inc.
SFRN JOB NO: 89124
DATE
JUNE 19, 1990
TARGET SHOPPING CENTER
ENGINEERS COST ESTIMATE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
PAVING, GRADING & DRAINAGE
= $ 637681. 25
WATER
= $ 83685.00
SANITARY
= $ 35890.00
TOTAL = $ 757256.25
CONTINGENCY (15%) = $ 113588.44
GRAND TOTAL = $ 870844.69
** NOTE **
This Engineers opinion of cost is for preliminary
feasibility and budget purposes only. It is not based
on a completed set of approved plans. Final project
costs may vary substantially.
Engineers. Planners. Surveyors
1201 Belvedere Road, West Palm Beach, Florida 33405
Tel. 407/655.1151 Fax 4<171832,9390
_ ~l~
Swte 340, 900 East Ocean Blvd., Stuart, Florida 34994
Te!, 4<17 fl86-3223 Fax 4<17 fl86-8491
III Shalloway, Foy,
Rayman & Newell, Inc.
SFRN JOB NO: 89124
DATE
JUNE 19, 1990
TARGET SHOPPING CENTER
ENGINEERS COST ESTIMATE
PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE
===~===================~==============================================
SOD 750. SY @ $ 1.40 $ 1050.00
STOP SIGN 30. EA @ $ 205.00 = $ 6150.00
1 1/2" ACSC TYPE II 32400. SY @ $ 3.25 = $ 105300.00
6" LIMEROCK BASE 34020. SY @ $ 5.50 = $ 187110.00
2" ACSC TYPE S-III 7100. SY @ $ 5.50 = $ 39050.00
9" LIMEROCK BASE 7455. SY @ $ 7.25 = $ 54048.75
12" COMPACTED SUBGRADE 43450. SY @ $ 1.25 $ 54312.50
SAWCUT ASPHALT 1. LS @ $ 150.00 = $ 150.00
1ft CONC HEADER CURB 64. LF @ $ 7.00 = $ 448.00
TYPE "0" CURB 3400. LF @ $ 6.25 = $ 21250.00
CONC WHEEL STOP 781. EA @ $ 8.00 = $ 6248.00
24" WHITE STOP BAR THERMO 320. LF @ $ 2.50 = $ 800.00
SIGNING & STRIPING 1. LS @ $ 6000.00 = $ 6000.00
TYPE C INLET 14. EA @ $ 1400.00 = $ 19600.00
TYPE E INLET WI WEIR 2. EA @ $ 2700.00 = $ 5400.00
TYPE D INLET 7. EA @ $ 1600.00 = $ 11200.00
TYPE D MANHOLE 1. EA @ $ 1600.00 = $ 1600.00
15" RCP 1453. LF @ $ 20.00 = $ 29060.00
18" RCP 195. LF @ $ 23.00 = $ 4485.00
IS" CAP 240. LF @ $ 17.00 = $ 4080.00
IS" PERF. CAP WI D.F. 1722. LF @ $ 37.00 = $ 63714.00
S.C. ENDWALL WI 18" DIA. 2. EA @ $ 400.00 = $ 800.00
6" PVC - R.W.L. 50. LF @ $ 10.00 = $ 500.00
8" PVC - R.W.L. 625. LF @ $ 12.00 = $ 7500.00
12" PVC - R.W.L. 375. LF @ $ 15.00 = $ 5625.00
CLEANOUT PVC - R.W.L. 1. LS @ $ 600.00 = $ 600.00
CONCRETE DUMPSTER PADS 3. EA @ $ 500.00 = $ 1500.00
---------------------
TOTAL = $ 637681.25
Engineers. Planners. Surveyors
1201 Belvedere Road, West Pahn Beach, Florida 33405
Tel. 407/655.1151 Fax 407/832.9390
Suire 340, 900 East Ocean Blvd., Stuart, Florida 34994
Tel. 4071286-3223 Fax 4071286-8491
. Shalloway, Foy,
Rayman & Newell, Inc.
SFRN JOB NO: 89124
DATE
JUNE 19, 1990
TARGET SHOPPING CENTER
ENGINEERS COST ESTIMATE
WATER
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
8" DIP 2250. LF @ $ 13.20 = $ 29700.00
8" 90 DEG. EL. 12. EA @ $ 180.00 = $ 2160.00
8" GATE VALVE & BOX 7. EA @ $ 525.00 = $ 3675.00
8" TEE 3. EA @ $ 350.00 = $ 1050.00
8"x6" TEE 5. EA @ $ 320.00 = $ 1600.00
F.H. ASM. WI 6" G.V. 6. EA @ $ 1230.00 = $ 7380.00
SAMPLE TAP 2. EA @ $ 200.00 = $ 400.00
8" DETECTOR CHECK ASSEM. l. EA @ $ 8500.00 = $ 8500.00
10"x8" TAP. SLV. & VALVE l. EA @ $ 2400.00 = $ 2400.00
16"x8" TAP. SLV. & VALVE l. EA @ $ 3000.00 = $ 3000.00
1" SERVICE & APPURTENANCES 300. LF @ $ 10.00 = $ 3000.00
1 1/2" SERVICE & APPURTENANCES 80. LF @ $ 12.00 = $ 960.00
2" SERVICE & APPURTENANCES 110. LF @ $ 16.00 = $ 1760.00
2" BACKFLOW PREVENTER 2. LF @ $ 250.00 = $ 500.00
3/4" BACKFLOW PREVENTER 13. LF @ $ 200.00 = $ 2600.00
JACK & BORE 20" STEEL CASING 100. LF @ $ 150.00 = $ 15000.00
---------------------
TOTAL = $ 83685.00
Engineers. Planners. Surveyors
1201 Belvedere Road, West Palm Beach, Florida 33405
Tel. 4071655-1151 Fax 4071832,9390
Suite 340.900 East Ocean Blw., Stuart, Florida 34994
Tel. 4071286-3223 Fax 4071286-8491
==-= Shalloway, Foy,
Rayman & Newell, Inc.
SFRN JOB NO: 89124
DATE
JUNE 19, 1990
TARGET SHOPPING CENTER
ENGINEERS COST ESTIMATE
SANITARY
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
8" VCP 0-6ft CUT 516. LF @ $ 12.00 = $ 6192.00
8" VCP 6-8ft CUT 670. LF @ $ 14.00 $ 9380.00
8" DIP 0-6ft CUT 92. LF @ $ 23.00 = $ 2116.00
8" DIP 6-8ft CUT 63. LF @ $ 24.00 = $ 1512.00
MANHOLE 0-6ft CUT 5. EA @ $ 1250.00 = $ 6250.00
MANHOLE 6-8ft CUT 3. EA @ $ 1410.00 = $ 4230.00
CLEANOUT 4. EA @ $ 115.00 = $ 460.00
CONNECT TO EXIST. MANHOLE l. EA @ $ 1750.00 = $ 1750.00
6" SERVICE & WYE 500. LF @ $ 8.00 = $ 4000.00
---------------------
TOTAL = $ 35890.00
Engineers. Planners. Surveyors
1201 Belvedere Road, West Palm Beach. Florida 33405
Tel, 407/655-1151 Fax 407/832-9390
Suite 340. 900 East Ocean Blvd., Stuart, Florida 34994
TeL 407/286-3223 Fax 407/286-8491
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE . PLANNING. ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN
JERRY TURNER & ASSOCIATES
OF FLORIDA. INC.
25 SEABREEZE AVE.
DELRAY BEACH. FLORIDA 33444
305-276-0453
COST ESTIf'I.ATE
OFF-SITE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMEMTS
TARGET RETAIL CENTER - BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
Congress Avenue - Median Improvements
Quantity
Name
Specs nnit Price
rotal
(3 )
LIVE OAK
18'HEIGHT 8'eT $486.00
$1,458.00
Congress Avenue - ROW Improvements
10,760 sf
10,760 sf
St. Augustine sod
Irrigation
$
$
.15
$1,614.00
$4,842.00
.45
TOTAL - CONGRESS AVENUE
$7,914.00
N.W. 22nd Avenue - Median ImpI:Ovements
(3 ) LIVE OAK 18'HEIGHT g'CT $486.130 $1,458.00
(52 ) JASMINE lS"HEIGHT ~ 7.50 $ 390.00
"
1,622 sf St. Augustine sod I;> .15 $ 244.00
2,512 sf Irrigatlon $ .45 $1,131.00
(1 ) Jack and Bore $3,500.00
N.W. 22nd AVENUE - ROW Improvements
12,197 sf St. Augstine sed $ , c $1,830.00
...L..)
12,197 sf Irrigation $ .45 $5,489.00
TOTAL - N.W. 22nd AVENUE $1~r~42.~e
TOTAL OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS
$21,'0156.;01:1
MEMBERS - AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS AND AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PLANNERS
SFRN PROJECT #89124
DATE: JUNE 20, 1990
TARGET SHOPPING CENTER
ENGINEERS COST ESTIMATE
EARTHWORK
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
41,310 CU YD
x
$4.50jYD =
$185,895.00
SIDEWALKS
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
820 L.F.
x
$8.00jLF =
$ 6,560.00
SURVEY
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
PRM's, PCP's LUMP SUM
$2,500.00
$ 2,500.00
CONCRETE BUFFER WALL
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
986 L.F.
x
$ 15.00jLF
=
$ 14,790.00
TRAFFIC CONTROL
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
LUMP SUM
=
$ 2,000.00
'S
Shalloway, Foy,
Rayman & Newell, Inc.
TARGET SHOPPING CENTER
SFRH PROJECT NO. 89129
D.O.T. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
BY: BRIAN J. LaMOTTE, P.E.
JANUARY 26, 1990
t l~{~
~
Engineers. Planners. Surveyors
120l Belvedere Road. West Palm Beach, Florida 33405
Tel. 407/655-1151 Fax 407/832.9390
8uz..y
t:.AtJr
Suite 340, 900 East Ocean Blvd., Stuart, Florida 34994
Tel, 407 /286.3223
f
01-26-1990
C1 = 0.80 C2 = 0.00 C3 = 0.00 II = 0.024
STORK FREQ. = 3
ZOHE = 10
PROJECT TARGET JOB #89124
I DRAIIlAGE AREA i
STRllC'l' I (ACRES) I
FROIl LEHGTB I IIlCR SUB. SUU I TOe TOF IHTEH.
TO (FT) I TOT. (CA) 1 (KIll) (KIll)
TOTAL
TOTAL R.O.
(CA) (CFS)
i ELEV. OF H.G. I
lliLET I IlIVERT EL. I
!LEV I UPPER r.oo:R FALL I
(FT) I EHD EHD (FT) I
I HYD. i
I PRY. I
DIA./ SLOPE I VEL. CAP.
(Ill) I l I (FPS) (CFS)
II
~========~==================~==================~====~==========================================================================
1
2
0.21 0.21 0.17
45 10.00 1.16 6.81 0.17
11.39 11.37 0.02
1.1412.00 7.25 7.16 0.09
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.040
18 0.200 0.65 1.1
2
3
0.23 0.44 0.35 11.37 11.23 0.14
85 11.16 1.08 6.56 0.35 2.31 12.00 7.16 6.99 0.17 18
0.165
0.200 1.31
2.3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3
4
0.65 1.09 0.87 11.23 10.98 0.25
125 12.24 1.18 6.34 0.87 5.5312.00 6.99 6.76 0.22 24
0.204
0.180 1.76
5.5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4
5
0.56 1.65 1.32 10.98 10.82 0.16
125 14.32 1.29 5.99 1.32 7.91 12.00 6.76 6.54 0.22 30
0.127
0.180 1.61
7.9
5
10
------------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------------.--------------------------------
0.46 2.11 1.69 10.82 10.57 0.25
150 18.41 1.34 5.42 1.69 9.15 12.00 6.54 6.27 0.27
0.170
30 0.180 1.86
9.1
6
8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.37 0.37 0.30 11.13 11.02 0.11
145 19.45 2.72 5.30 0.30 1.57 12.00 6.91 6.56 0.35 18
0.076
0.240 Q.89
1.6
7
8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.65 0.65 0.52
110 10.00 1.63 6.81 0.52
11.12 11.02 0.09
3.54 12.00 6.83 6.56 0.26 24
0.083
0.240 1.13
3.5
8
10
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.59 1.61 1.29
165 22.17 1.34 5.01
11.02 10.57 0.46
1.29 6.45 12.00 6.56 6.27 0.30 24
0.277
0.180 2.05
6.4
9
10
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.46 0.46 0.37
10.80 10.57 0.23
2.50 12.00 6.50 6.27 0.24 18
0.194
0.200 1.42
2.5
118
10.00 1.39 6.81
0.37
10
12
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.45 4.63 3.70
90 23.52 0.80 4.88
10.57 10.47 0.10
3.70 18.0612.00 6.27 6.16 0.11
11
12
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.110
42 0.120 1.88 18.1
0.27 0.27 0.22 10.58 10.47 0.11
165 10.00 3.31 6.81 0.22 1.47 12.00 6.49 6.16 0.33
0.067
18 0.200 0.83
1.5
12
14
---------------------------------------------------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------
0.43 5.33 4.26
125 24.31 0.98 4.80
10.47 10.29 0.18
4.26 20.48 12.00 6.16 6.03 0.13 42
13
14
-------------~-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.32 0.32 0.26 10.44 10.29 0.15
162 10.00 2.74 6.81 0.26 1.74 12.00 6.36 6.03 0.32 18
0.141
0.100
2.13 20.5
---------------------------------
0.094
0.200 0.99
1.7
14
16
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.65 6.30 5.04 10.29 10.05 0.24
125 25.29 0.84 4.72 5.04 23.7712.00 6.03 5.91 0.13
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.190
42 0.100 2.47 23.8
'\
,
I DRAIllAGE ilEA f
STRUCT I (ACRES) I
FiOIl LE1lGTB1IllCR SIlR. SIlR.T, TOe TOF IIlTEll.
TO (FT) I TOT. (CA) I (lIIll) (lIIll)
TOTAL
TOTAL R.O.
(CA) (CFS)
I ELEV. OF H.G. 1
IIlLET I I1lVERT EL. I
ELEV UPPER LOlIER FALL
(FT) I E1lD E1lD (FT)!
01-26-1990
C1 - 0.80 C2 - 0.00 C3 - 0.00 11 - 0.024
STORM FREQ. - 3
ZONE - 10
i HYD. i
I PRy. I
DU'I SLOPE, VEL. CAP. 11
(Ill) I l f (FPS) (CFS)
PROJECT : TARGET JOB 189124
===--============================================================================================================================
15 0.24 0.24 0.19 10.14 10.05 0.09 0.053
16 162 10.00 3.65 6.81 0.19 1.31 12.00 6.23 5.91 0.32 18 0.200 0.74 1.3
._~-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
16 0.46 7.00 5.60 10.05 9.84 0.21 0.112
17 190 26.14 1.53 4.64 5.60 26.01 12.00 5.91 5.72 0.19 48 0.100 2.07 26.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
17 1.48 8.48 6.78 9.84 9.50 0.34 0.155
18 220 27.67 1.50 4.52 6.78 30.67 12.00 5.72 5.50 0.22 48 0.100 2.44 30.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I DRAIllAGE AREA I
STROCT I (ACI1ES) I
FROK LEKGTH1IllCl1 SOB. SOB.T, TOe TOF INTEIl.
TO {FT) I TOT. (CA) I (KI&) (KIN)
TOTAL
TOTAL R.O.
(CA) (CFS)
I ELEV. OF H.G. i
IIILE'!' I INVERT EL. I
ELEV ,OPPER LOWER FALL,
(FT) I END END (FT) I
01-28-1990
Cl = 0.80 C2 = 0.00 C3 = 0.00 N = 0.024
STOiK FREQ. = 3
ZONE = 10
I HYD. I
I PHY. I
DIA., SLOPE, VEL. CAP. K
(INh I I (FPS) (CFS)
SIlALLOWAY, INC.
PROJECT : TARGET JOB 189124
===========================================================--====================================================================
1 0.71 0.71 0.57 11. 79 11.12 0.67 0.462
2 145 10.00 1.10 6.81 0.57 3.87 12.00 8.72 8.20 0.52 18 0.360 2.19 3.9
---~----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 0.59 1.30 1.04 11.12 10.79 0.33 0.311
3 105 11.10 0.80 6.57 1.04 6.83 12.00 8.21 7.83 0.38 24 0.360 2.17 6.8
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.-
3 0.59 1.89 1.51 10.79 10.44 0.35 0.190
5 185 11.91 1.56 6.41 1.51 9.69 12.00 7.83 7.50 0.33 30 0.180 1.97 9.7
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.---------
4 1.17 1.17 0.94 10.60 10.44 0.16 0.082
5 195 10.00 2.50 6.81 0.94 6.37 12.50 7.79 7.50 0.29 30 0.150 1.30 6.4
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.--
5 1.04 4.10 3.28 10.44 9.50 0.94 0.818
6 115 13.47 0.47 6.13 3.28 20.10 12.50 7.50 7.29 0.21 30 0.180 4.09 20.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. ,
!!U!'~!~I!!J
SUBJECT
,< r;;, (1 S' t-"<>PP U\ C, (<: rJ Ff! Jl9 ,.1 7
BY
H c r--=>R-.
$'-1.5- '10
[ I
eNGINEERS. PLANNERS. SUAVEYORS TEL 305/655."5'
1201 BELVEDERE ROAD, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33405
DATE
SHEET NO, .L OF ~ SCALE
&Frl TAA7t0d 7Rc,:.cH
-S'INcf TI-h. (f A. G>",,,,f%<,p,L S(rt:, t'Aj!\llol'--'"" "'-EQ'-'lfE) PRCTf~I\T..f4
If 0",( HALF (NCI-j
VOlu..f T<> I?f TRff\7f:1' d./J" 0.5--:--
= 1",-11\(-1,..1
IISS",,,,E
CO "'TIG> l. l' TQ. '-'-Cf'-' r- (;
IS' S bl A, T 10 , 7 S I
[L' I ~,l;;
(.,NTICol [l = (O,Ot>'
(~o IC,~S
n= 9,7~'
L'
V'
J.~' ~,I.S
J~"
,
(l = f,so
As = I'
1:[ , ",""
"
I\..
/1
"-1= \,'
~I
~
f;:: = 0'0001
v
l:: (H,-w 't ~ 11__1", -),.....~ TJ..fiL'llr)+ llii>l("'-y.)- w'1~
~,-' 9
00001 (h.5t Ic,T~"J.'l.r,.LI.-'-:L 'l.SLtJ.'.l,I..$", I) 1(/'f?y\""-~), L.d..lcs
157 b FT
"- frIN' - .('f
Pr.\'~ ....."'(
L ::
~
~\W\~
L
I
~~!!!.!!I
SUBJECT' ,\<~~ ~~C)'i?~\~c;,. ~ Ir'~~
BY "\<.. 'N\. ~ \A ~<<:.~
ENGIM;ERS - PLANNERS. SURVEYORS TEL. 3051655-1151
, 1201 BELVEDERE ROAD, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33405
DATE
""~"{
~ ~ \Q,o,~
.
SHEET NO, -L OF _ SCALE
"",,~R~ "'~~\-a..'\
\)~,,\.~~~ ~"-~~ "Cl~~ ~~ ~,~<::.~ - 'e::.,~"-,,Q:,~ ~t~~
:t:. ?~(:)~l::)~~~ ~~~",,\t:.~~ ~
---
\4.0C)
1\ .-SD
s.se
10.7S
\. ~~\'-<;;)\~~'\ ~\"""~,,~~ ~~~
2., ""\~\~~Y\. ~~~~\~""" \"'t::)\:
S. ~~~~'"'~ ~.....,~~ ""'~~
"l-, ~~''\3:~",,\'tl\:l ~~~~ ~~\~
-- - -
- - - -
- ---
\. \C,.....'- ~" ~
'2.. ,~\'-~\~~~
~, "'~~'l\~~~
4. \~~~~ \~~"'-::.
- --
\ C. \ ~
3.. ..s~
O.7D
8.CiO
~~~~~
~~"5:.
""I:..~~
r-.<:..~'<;;.~
TIT _ ~,~~""~~ ~
\. ~"'k~,,-,~"'''l::l~ ~~~C-~
- - - - b- 8' 9 ~c:....- \~ .
2. ~,'- ~,c:.~~ - - - o. 73 "'~- \~.
~ 0.70 "'~~"'::. <ii. a\'e" s.=O.~~H
a. "eo"...... ~,c:.~"'~~ - 9. be:> ~<;;;.'S.
~ \....\~""--"..... ~~~ \\.SD 'C \4.tlD
'5:."C~ 't~~""" - 2..S \"c:..~~~ ~~~~ ""~ ~''''''=-
\).J~\~ Q...~~~""" ~
"e'-~~~~~ \'S 6 'x. """
C~\: ~ ,,'-.).... ~\ ~ ~ \ ~
~4" \>>\ ""i:l~ ,." '= JO.7oS
\~\1~~""'~~ ~\~~~'-~ }-.,.~
\~" R~~ f>,,\: /oc:f-c
~~~~
i
!
PROJECT NAIIE: TARGET
*** SCS RUNOFF & FLOOD ROUTING - 3 - YEAR STORK
RAINFALL = 2.5 INCHES 24 HOUR DURATION STORK
TIME
(HR)
RAIN
(IN)
RUNOFF
(IN)
RUNOFF
(A-F)
DISCHARGE STORAGE STAGE
(CFS) (A-F) (FT)
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00
5.00 0.16 0.01 0.01 0.0 0.01 0.16
10.00 0.53 0.23 0.25 0.0 0.25 3.86
10.50 0.59 0.27 0.30 0.0 0.30 4.65
11.00 0.67 0.34 0.37 0.0 0.37 5.74
11.25 0.74 0.39 0.43 0.0 0.43 6.63
11.50 0.80 0.44 0.49 0.0 0.49 7.53
11.75 1.22 0.82 0.90 11.3 0.79 11.74
12.00 1.64 1.22 1.34 13.0 0.97 11. 92
12.25 1. 73 1.30 1.43 11.5 0.81 11.76
12.50 1.82 1.39 1.53 10.3 0.68 11.63
12.75 1.87 1.44 1.58 7.2 0.55 11.36
13.00 1.92 1.48 1.63 0.0 0.53 8.12
13.50 1.99 1.55 1. 70 2.4 0.55 10.99
14.00 2.05 1.61 1. 76 0.5 0.55 9.66
19.00 2.34 1.89 2.07 1.0 0.55 10.77
24.00 2.50 2.05 2.25 0.0 0.53 8.18
. Shalloway, Foy,
Rayman & Newell, mc.
SFRN JOB NO: 89124
DATE
MAY 24, 1990
TARGET SHOPPING CENTER
ENGINEERS COST ESTIMATE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
PAVING, GRADING & DRAINAGE
= $ 629351.30
WATER
= $ 76520.00
SANITARY
= $ 35455.00
------------------------
TOTAL = $ 741326.30
CONTINGENCY (15%) = $ 111198.90
------------------------
GRAND TOTAL = $ 852525.20
** NOTE **
This Engineers opinion of cost is for preliminary
feasibility and budget purposes only. It is not based
on a completed set of approved plans. Final project
costs may vary substantially.
Engineers. Planners. Surveyors
1201 Belvedere Road, Welt Palm Beach. Florida 33405
Tel. 407/655-1151 Fax 407/832.9390
Suite 340, 900 EaSl Ocean Blvd., StU&l1, Florida 34994
Tel. 4071286 3223 Fax 407(286-8491
........
_ Shalloway, Foy,
IIIiiIiIII!!I Rayman & Newell, Inc.
.
AHERICAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/TARGET
(SFRN PROJECT 1891241
ONSITE EARTHWORK
EXISTING ELEVATION AT EACH NODE OF 100'x 100' GRID
A B C D E F G H I J K
1 11.4 11.6 11.6 12 11.9 12.4 12.6 11.3 10.45 10.8 13,68
2 11.8 12.1 12.4 13 12.2 12.5 13.8 11.3 10.5 10,4 13.36
3 12.4 11.9 12.2 12.7 12.3 12.3 13.2 12.9 10.6 10.1 13.16
4 11.8 12.3 12.4 12.2 12.3 12.1 12.8 10.6 13.25
5 11.8 12.8 13.4 12.3 12.6 12.2 12.6 13.5 13.4
6 12.4 11.6 5.2 1.95 11,7 12 12.3 13,4
7 11.7 12.4 11.7 12 11.8 12.4 12.9
8 12.25 12.4
AHERICAN DEVELOPHENT CORPORATION/TARGET
(SFRN PROJECT 189124)
ONSITE EARTHWORK
AREA OF EACH GRID (SQ. FT.)
A B C D E F G H I J K
1 2025 5405 5928 6252 6610 7007 7363 7780 8109 8499 3755
2 4500 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 4000
3 3038 9816 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 4000
4 8439 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 4000
5 8773 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 4000
6 8200 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 4000
7 5728 5789 10000 8430 7692 . 7692 3200
8 4160 4480
>it
~~~~
Engineers. Planners. Surveyors
1201 Belvedere Road. WeSI Pahn Bcach, Florida 3340S
Tel. 407/655-1151 Fox 407/832.9390
Suite 340, 900 East Ocean Blvd., Stuan, Florida 34994
Tel. 407/286-3223 Fox 407/286-8491
_ Shalloway, Foy,
I!IiiIIII Rayman & Newell, Inc.
AHERICAN DEVELOPHENT CORPORATION/TARGET
(SFRN PROJECT '89124)
ONSITE EARTHI<<lRK
PROPOSED ELEVATION AT EACH HODE OF 100'x 100' GRID
A B C D E F G H I J K
1 11.25 11.5 12 11.3 11.5 11.1 11. 25 11.5 11.25 11.25 11. 25
2 12.25 12.5 13.25 12.4 12.2 12.25 11. 75 11.75 12 11.65 11. 25
3 12.1 11. 88 12.05 12.75 13.25 12.25 12 11.75 11. 85 12.05 11.75
4 12.15 13.25 13.25 13.25 13.25 12.25 12 11. 85 11
5 11.85 13.25 13.25 13.25 13.25 13.25 12.35 13.25 12,05
6 12.25 13.25 13.25 13.25 13.25 12.65 12.25 12.5
7 10.25 11.75 12.05 13.25 11.75 13.25 12
8 11.8 12.15
Engineers. Planners. Surveyors
1201 Belvedere Road, Welt Palm Beach, Florida 33405
Tel. 407/655.1151 Fax 4071832.9390
Suite 340. 900 Easl Ocean Blvd., Stuart. Florida 34994
Tel. 407/286-3223 Fax 407/286-8491
.
!!!!!!!II Shalloway, Foy,
IIIiIiII!I Rayman & Newell,lnc.
AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/TARGET
(SFRN PROJECT /89124)
ONSITE EARTHWORK
DEPTH OF CUT/FILL AT EACH NODE OF 100'x 100' GRID
(NOTE: tVE=FILL, -VE=CUT)
A B C D E F G H I J K
1 -0.15 -0.1 0.48 -0.7 -0.4 -1.3 -1. 35 0.24 0.96 0.54 -2.43
2 0.54 0.48 1.02 -0.6 0 -0.25 -2.05 0.54 1.8 1.5 -2.11
3 -0.3 -0.02 -0.15 0.06 1.14 -0.05 -1.2 -1.15 1.5 2.34 -1. 41
4 0.42 1.14 1.02 1.26 1.14 0.18 -0.8 1.5 -2.25
5 0.06 0.54 -0.15 1.14 0,78 1.26 -0.25 -0.25 -1.35
6 -0.15 1.98 9.66 13.56 1.86 0.78 -0.05 -0.9
7 -1.45 -0.65 0.42 1.5 -0.05 1.02 -0.9
8 -0.45 -0.25
AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/TARGET
(SFRN PROJECT /89124)
ONSITE EARTHWORK
VOLUNE OF CUT/FILL (CUBIC FEET) AT EACH NODE OF 100'x 100' GRID
(NOTE: tVE=FILL, -VE=CUT)
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
1 -303.75 -540.5 2845.44 -4376.4 -2644 -9109.1 -9940.05 1867.2 7784.64 4589.46 -9124.65
2 2430 4800 10200 -6000 0 -2500 -20500 5400 18000 15000 -8440
3 -911.4 -196.32 -1500 600 11400 -500 -12000 -11500 15000 23400 -5640
4 3544.38 Il400 10200 12600 11400 1800 -8000 15000 -9000
5 526.38 5400 -1500 11400 7800 12600 -2500 -2500 -5400
6 -1230 19800 96600 135600 18600 7800 -500 -3600
7 -8305.6 -3762.85 4200 12645 -384.6 7845.84 -2880
8 -1872 -1120
TOTAL VOLUME OF CUT/FILL (CUBIC YARDSI=
41310.79
THEREFORE, TOTAL VOLUME OF FILL (ONSITE) REQUIRED IS= 41310
Engineers. Planners. Surveyors
1201 Belvedere Road, Welt Palm Beach, Florida 33405 Suite 340, 900 Eaat Ocean Blvd., Stuart, Florida 34994
Tel. 400/655-1151 Fax 400/832-9390 Tel. 400/286-3223 Fax 400/286 8491
I Kim/ey.Horn I
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
Prepared for:
R.E. Boyer
Nashua, New Hampshire
Prepared by:
Klmley-Hom and Associates, Inc.
West Palm Beach, Florida
December 1989
Revised January 1990
COPR Klmley-Hora
4071T.00
I Kim/ey.Horn I
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc,
ENGINEERS. PLANNERS. SURVEYORS
4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 407 845-0665 Facsimile 407 863-8175
December 27, 1989
Revised J an uary 3, 1990
4071 T.00(07)
American Development
c/o Mr. R.E. Boyer
4 Water Street
Nashua, New Hampshire 03060
Re: American Development
Boynton Beach, Florida
Dear Mr. Boyer:
We are pleased to submit our traffic impact analysis for the proposed
American Development shopping center to be located at the southwest
quadrant of Congress Avenue and N.W. 22nd Avenue in Boynton Beach, Florida.
It has been a pleasure working with you and if you have any questions,
please do not hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
~ ~&~r
Steven G. Godfrey, P.E.
Principal
;:2':hf).
} ho/~ 6
SGG/KC:jsl
Florida Registration
Number 18499
4071 TOO-RB-LOIOSIlO-,.., wp
Anaheim t Charlotte t Dallas . Fort Lauderdale t Fort Myers f NashVIlle . Orlando t Phoenix
Raleigh . San Diego . Stuart . Tampa . Vero Beach . Virginia Beach . West Palm Beach
Building client relationship. since 1967
I Kim/ey.Horn I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
~
INTRODUCTION
INVENTOR Y AND PLANNING DATA 2
Inventory 2
Planning Data 2
PROJECT TRAFFIC 4
Traffic Generation 4
Traffic Distribution 4
Traffic Assignment 6
BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 7
ASSURED CONSTRUCTION 8
LINK EVALUATION 9
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS 11
RECOMMENDATIONS 14
APPENDIX A - Critical Movement Analyses Worksheets
APPENDIX B - Highway Capacity Manual Intersection Analysis
4071 TOO- TOC-ROI0390-toc. wp
-i-
I Kim/ey.Horn I
LIST OF FIGURES
Filzure No.
I
2
3
Title
Existing Roadway Conditions
Performance Standards Analysis
PM Peak Hour Traffic Assignment
LIST OF TABLES
Table No.
Title
Trip Generation
4071 TOO- TOC-ROIOSgo-toc.wp
-ii-
~
3
10
12
~
5
I Kim/ey.Horn I
INTRODUCTION
The proposed American Development site has been evaluated for 140,000 square
feet of retail shops. The project will be located in the southwest quadrant of
Congress Avenue and N.W. 22nd Avenue in the City of Boynton Beach, Florida.
Access to the development will be provided on both Congress Avenue and N.W.
22nd Avenue. In addition, the center will have cross access with Catalina
Centre located south of the site.
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., was retained to prepare a traffic impact
analysis for the proposed development. The analysis was performed in
accordance with the guidelines set forth in the Palm Beach County Traffic
Performance Standards, with the exception of level of service standards, as
requested by the City of Boynton Beach. Level of service standards were
obtained from the City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan. This document
presents the methodology and the findings of these analyses.
The traffic impact analysis examined the site access intersections, and
intersections on Congress A venue that represent the termini of impacted links.
The analysis used current data available from Palm Beach County, which was
supplemented with data collected in the field. It was assumed that the
development was fully built out by the year 1992.
4071TOO-R010390-kc.wp
-1-
I Kim/ey.Horn I
INVENTORY AND PLANNING DATA
Ioveotorv
The data used in this analysis were obtained from Palm Beach County and from
field studies performed by Kimley-Horn. The data included:
o PM peak hour turning movement counts
o 1988/1989 and 1989 average annual 24-hour traffic volumes
o Historic count data
o Roadway geometrics
o Approved development traffic
Counts were adjusted to reflect existing average annual daily traffic conditions
where necessary. Existing area roadway conditions are shown in Figure 1.
PlaooloR Data
Site related information was provided by Currie Schneider and Associates. The
analysis contained herein is based on primary site access on both N.W. 22nd
Avenue and Congress Avenue. Access continuity between Catalina Centre and
American Development is also assumed.
4011 TOO-ROI0390-te,"p
-2-
cL!
o
-.....
~..N
..
o
<C .....
",N
..
!
.N.
~
NOT TO SCALE
o
"
W
U
Z
W
"
~
...
HYPOLUXO RO.
H-;J,\:;KZ
!,--! .
N
NO
U.....
,,;.
N
A
8025
2L
N.W. UNO AVE.
r-,
'( SITE I
',---"" J
..
00
.. .....
....m""
N
OLD BOYNTON RD.
A
8448
2L
..
"0
o ..,..~
...
N
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD.
o
"0
oC ......J
"''''
N
iii
~
CI)
CI)
w
"
"
Z
o
U
WOOLBRIGHT RD.
LEGEND
C
21,822
4LD
LEVEL OF SERVICE
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
LANE GEOMETRY
INTERCHANGE
.
C
43,888
8LD
'"
..
.!.
FIGURE 1
AMERICAN OEVELOPMENT
EXISTING ROADWAY
CONDITIONS
1__.1
4071T.OO
I Kim/ey.Horn I
PROJECT TRAFFIC
Traffic Generation
The traffic generation potential for the proposed American Development
shopping center was based on the traffic generation rates published by Palm
Beach County. The development was generated considering its relationship to
the existing Catalina Centre. The two shopping centers are contiguous and
will share common access. With respect to traffic generation and circulation,
they will function as one center. Peak hour characteristics were based on
information published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trio
Generation Reoort (Fourth Edition). The generation rates used in the analysis
are included in Table 1.
Traffic DIstribution
From a review of the existing and approved development in Palm Beach County
and considering the arterial network with its travel time characteristics, the
external traffic distribution was calculated. The distribution, summarized by
general directions, is summarized below:
NORTH 30%
SOUTH 30%
EAST 15%
WEST 25%
4011 TOO-R010390-kc, wp
-4-
I Kim/ey.Horn I
8\ N '" '"
'" 0 :'!
~ ~
.
.
. ~I ~ N '"
~ '" ~
'" '"
~
~I 0 0; '"
:;>. ~
~ ..,
l,~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ N
'" "'. o.
- . .;
. ~ ..,
>
.
z
~ '" ~ '"
~ '" ~
~. "'.
;! 0 ~
z
0 .
. 0
c
w "
w
~ z ~ N
.. W ~ ":
c ~ +
. ~ 0 ~
;; ~ .~ ~I ;: . " +
..,
. . . '" ~ .
0 . 0 .
...: c 5
N ~ .
r,> ~
, N
;) . . ~<c . N
I.l ~ ~ , , ~ ~
~ ,
.';) 0 Q J- \ ) 0
';; 0 0_",- ~ 0
N 0 o~'r~{ 0
~
A N N '" , ' 0 ~
0 :;>. ;! ~
~ ,l ..." "
" ..
." ..
" 0
(".~"' .
~, ,
. 0
("G 0 ..
. o. ~
..
~ - .
.. 0 '5
.. - ~
c . . .
. 0 .. u
. 0 . .
. . K . ~
~ K 0
, 0 ~ ,
~ . 0 ~ 0.
. .. .
. . > ~ .
. 0 > 0 . u
~ . . . 0 .
u 0 u . , ~
u C <Tn
. 0 . . . . ~
0 . 0 t ,~
u . .
.. .. - . .
. I . ~
. I . .
. . . ~
u c u z
4071TOO-ROI03IlO-ke,wp
-5-
I Kim/ey.Horn I
Traffic: Asshmment
The distributed external trips for the project at full buildout were assigned to
the roadways within the radius of influence, both in terms of daily external
trips and PM peak hour directional volumes as appropriate. The assignment is
based on estimated minimal travel routes and considered assured construction.
4071 TOO-ROIOSllO-kc,,,p
-6-
I Kim/ey.Horn I
BACKGROUND TRAFFIC
Traffic counts during the PM peak hour were conducted at the existing site
access and on N.W. 22nd Avenue. Trips that will be generated by six approved
developments in the area were reviewed. These developments are as follows:
1. Quantum Park (Boynton Beach Park of Commerce)
2. Motorola
3. Citrus Glen PUD
4. Melear PUD
5. Elementary School "Po
6. Knollwood Groves
The review of the developments above indicated that none of the projects add
ten percent (10%) of the Level of Service "D" service volume on the links in
the study area. Therefore, traffic from these developments was not added to
the projected background traffic.
According to requirements of the Palm Beach Traffic Performance Standards,
existing traffic volumes were grown by factors determined by a review of
anticipated development and historical growth data. The growth rates ranged
from 5% to 9.8%.
4071TOO-ROI0390-ke,...p
-7-
I Kimley.Horn I
ASSURED CONSTRUCTION
The existing laneages for each link analyzed were identified. A review of the
Palm Beach County Five-Year Plan, Florida Department of Transportation, as
well as those improvements committed by the developer's of projects in the
area, was made to identify pertinent roadway improvements.
No roadway improvements were identified as assured construction.
The following improvements were identified as requirements of development for
the developer listed:
Fiscal Required
Roadwav Link ImDrovement Year Bv
Congress A ve- N.W. 22nd Avenue to 6LD 90/91 Boynton ? It $J'u'IJf\)
nue Boynton Beach Boulevard West
N.W. 22nd Avenue to 6LD N/A Village .-, k>J" ~1I
,
Miner Road Shopes
4071TOO-ROIOS90-kc.wp
-8-
I Kim/ey.Horn I
LINK EVALUATION
A link performance standard evaluation was undertaken for each link
considering its total traffic volumes and the roadway laneage to be in place in
1992. Project traffic, total traffic and the level of service by link are
depicted in Figure 2. Based on generalized Palm Beach County service
volumes, Level of Service "C" will be maintained within the impact area, with
the exception of the links listed below.
Based on average annual daily traffic (AADT), Boynton Beach Boulevard from
Old Boynton Road to 1-95 will function at Level of Service "D" as allowed in
the City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan. In order to comply with City
criteria, Congress A venue would need to be upgraded to a six-lane facility
from Boynton Beach Boulevard to N.W. 22nd Avenue. This link has significant
impact and exceeds the generalized performance standard threshold for Level
of Service "D". The improvement is a condition of the Boynton West
Development Order.
Theoretically, generalized link analysis (AADT) suggests that Congress Avenue
will operate at Level of Service "D" between N.W. 22nd Avenue and Hypoluxo
Road. However, in urban areas. link operating conditions are actually
controlled by, and more accurately defined by the operation of the
intersections at the termini of the link. Further analyses of the operating
conditions within the vicinity of this link were made. Detailed intersection
analyses, included in Appendix A. show that with certain turn lane
improvements (see Recommendations), the intersections of Congress Avenue
with N.W. 22nd Avenue, and with Hypoluxo Road can operate at Level of
Service "D" for peak season, peak hour conditions. This is consistent with the
Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan.
4011TOO-ROI03llO-kc.wp
.9-
;::
..'"
G:IIoC') ..J
f?ON
~
o
ar~:..J
N _N
o
~
t
.N-
~
NOT TO SCALE
..
....0
QC'IItD-I
t"- ....
!:!
;;;
....0
00.....1
01"';'"
..
-
C
454
111,938)
2L
N. W. 22ND AVE.
r--~
\. SITE ,
,~_J
..
"00
'w~ tn..~
~..
..
C
515
(12,089/
2L
OLD BOYNTON RD.
;;;
....:::0
LU~'ii;
..
BOYNTON BEACH BLVlf.
ci
..
I&J
o
:z:
I&J
..
~
...
....
..
..~O
'< II) ....J
......
..
ui
~
::: WOOLBRIGHT RD.
I&J
..
Cl
z
o
o
LEGEND
A
454
133,0881
aLD
.
LEVEL OF SERVICE
PROJECT TRAFFIC
TOTAL TRAFFIC
LANE GEOMETRY
INTERCHANGE
HYPOLUXO RD.
D
545
(52,495)
8LD
'"
..
.L
FIGURE 2
AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT
PERFORMANCE STANDARD
ANALYSIS
1'--1
4071T.OO
I Kim/ey.Horn I
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS
According to the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards, major
intersections should be analyzed if anyone of their approaches are anticipated
to be impacted by the proposed project in excess of 10 percent of the AADT.
No major intersections in the study area met this criteria.
PM peak hour turning movement traffic counts were obtained on Congress
Avenue at the north access to the existing Catalina Centre and on N.W. 22nd
Avenue at the Mahogany Bay entrance. The historical growth was also
applied to the through volumes to arrive at 1992 background peak hour traffic
volumes. Catalina Centre volumes were adjusted to reflect a connection to
N.W. 22nd Avenue. Project peak hour traffic was then added to each access
intersection. Peak hour project and total traffic at project entrances are
depicted on Figure 3.
An unsignalized capacity analysis was performed for each of the project access
intersections. The Intersection Analyses worksheets are included in
Appendix B.
The worksheets indicate that the project trips at the access on Congress
Avenue will experience some delays. The worksheet does not account for gaps
created by the signal just north of the access at Congress Avenue and N.W.
22nd Avenue or the fact that a sufficient median exists at the access to
provide refuge for vehicles making this left hand turn. This allows the left.
turn to be made in two separate manuevers.
It is also probable that the left-turns desiring to exit the site on Congress
Avenue will redistribute to the access on N.W. 22nd Avenue or to the adjacent
signalized Catalina Centre access to the south on Congress A venue during peak
4011 TOO-ROUlllllO-kc, wp
-11-
N.W. UNO AVE.
N-iii
=~....
0"'0
H\
_0(1101
-4(871)
- 22(22)
1-
,
~
(12)0-
(556)3-
(24)20 _
Hf
..~~
~-oo
...-..-
-00
.. ..
- -
/
(
SITE
w
>,
c
..
..
w
a:
"
z
o
"
.1-
-'
-..
"00
....
~~
n
,
~
,
~-
(78)25 -
(105180 _
H
....
00-
oo;
..~
-~
LEGEND
!
-N'
1
60
(1051
PROJECT TRAFFIC
TOTAL TRAFFIC
FIGURE 3
AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT
PM PEAK HOUR
NOT TO SCALE
1---1
40TH.OO
I Kim/er.Horn I
traffic periods.
Avenue has been
Avenue.
A portion of the exiting left-turn volume on Congress
redistributed to the less congested access at N.W. 22nd
The opportunities afforded by the signalized entrance to Catalina Centre and
the N.W. 22nd Avenue entrance should allow adequate driver discretion to
avoid excessive delay.
4071TOO-ROI0390-kc,wp
-13-
I Kim/ey.Horn I
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the analyses presented, which generally conform to the requirements
of the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards, the improvements
presented in the previous link evaluation and intersection analysis sections
would be required. These improvements are summarized below:
o Site Access on N.W. 22nd Avenue
Northbound through/left-turn lane
Separate northbound right-turn lane
o N.W. 22nd Avenue and ConRress Avenue
Separate northbound right-turn lane
Second northbound left-turn lane by restriping
Separate southbound right-turn lane
Separate eastbound right-turn lane
Second westbound through lane
o Hvooluxo Road and ConRress Avenue
Second westbound left-turn lane
o Six-laning of Congress Avenue from N.W. 22nd Avenue to Boynton Beach
Boulevard.
4071TOO-ROUIS90-kc.wp
-14-
I Kim/ey.Horn I
APPENDIX A
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSES WORKSHEETS
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
CONGRESS AVENUE AND N.W. 22ND AVENUE
EXISTING CONDITIONS - PM PEAK HOUR Iqg'l Co~l- 1:1./28/89
**********************************
LEVEL OF SERVICE C
SATURATION 75%
CRITICAL N/S VOL 918
CRITICAL E/W VOL 331
CRITICAL SUM 1249
*************************************
LANE
NORTHBOUND
MOV WIDTH
LANE GEOMETRY
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
WESTBOUND
MOV WIDTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
RT.
T. .
L. .
12.0
12.0
12.0
RT.
T. .
L. .
12.0
12.0
12.0
RT.
T. .
L. .
12.0
12.0
12.0
R. .
T. .
L. .
12.0
12.0
12.0
NORTHBOUND
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
LEFT
THRU
RIGHT
271
1302
184
68
887
175
143
131
129
145
183
58 (I,H)
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
TRUCKS (%)
5
5
5
5
LOCAL BUSES (#/HR)
o
o
o
o
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
PHASING N/S
E/W
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
LEFTS/CYCLE
:4. Both Turns Protected (With Overlap)
:4. Both Turns Protected (With Overlap)
1. 0 - 99 ( #PED/HR )
90 SECONDS
1.0
CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
THRU -RIGHT
LEFT
NORTHBOUND
885
276
SOUTHBOUND
631
33
EASTBOUND
152
123
WESTBOUND
208
125
LEFT TURN CHECK
INPUT VOLUME
ADJUSTED VOL
CAPACITY
MOVEMENT
NORTHBOUND
271
277
o
N/A
SOUTHBOUND
68
34
o
N/A
EASTBOUND
143
123
o
N/A
WESTBOUND
145
126
o
N/A
CON22.CMA
January
3, 1990
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
CONGRESS AVENUE AND N.W. 22ND AVENUE
1992 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC - PM PEAK HOUR
**********************************
LEVEL OF SERVICE E
SATURATION 103%
CRITICAL N/S VOL 1211
CRITICAL E/W VOL 498
CRITICAL SUM 1709
*************************************
LANE
NORTHBOUND
MOV WIDTH
LANE GEOMETRY
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
WESTBOUND
MOV WIDTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
RT.
T. .
L. .
12.0
12.0
12.0
RT.
T. .
L. .
12.0
12.0
12.0
RT.
T. .
L. .
12.0
12.0
12.0
Roo
Too
L. .
12.0
12.0
12.0
NORTHBOUND
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
LEFT
THRU
RIGHT
369
1667
258
95
1135
238
194
187
175
203
276
81 (no)
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
TRUCKS (%)
5
5
5
5
LOCAL BUSES (#/HR)
o
o
o
o
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
PHASING N/S
E/W
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
LEFTS/CYCLE
:4. Both Turns
:4. Both Turns
1. 0
90 SECONDS
1.0
Protected (With Overlap)
Protected (With Overlap)
99 ( #PED/HR )
CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
THRU -RIGHT
LEFT
NORTHBOUND
1146
394
SOUTHBOUND
816
65
EASTBOUND
212
184
WESTBOUND
314
195
LEFT TURN CHECK
INPUT VOLUME
ADJUSTED VOL
CAPACITY
MOVEMENT
NORTHBOUND
369
394
o
N/A
SOUTHBOUND
95
66
o
N/A
EASTBOUND
194
185
o
N/A
WESTBOUND
203
195
o
N/A
CON22B.CMA
January
3, 1990
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
CONGRESS AVENUE AND N.W. 22ND AVENUE
1992 TOTAL TRAFFIC - PM PEAK HOUR
**********************************
LEVEL OF SERVICE E
SATURATION 106%
CRITICAL N/S VOL 1236
CRITICAL E/W VOL 515
CRITICAL SUM 1751
*************************************
LANE
NORTHBOUND
MOV WIDTH
LANE GEOMETRY
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
WESTBOUND
MOV WIDTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
RT.
T. .
L. .
12.0
12.0
12.0
RT.
T. .
L. .
12.0
12.0
12.0
RT.
T. .
L. .
12.0
12.0
12.0
R. .
T. .
L. .
12.0
12.0
12.0
NORTHBOUND
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
LEFT
THRU
RIGHT
376
1690
264
95
1160
244
204
189
188
207
280
81 (116)
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
TRUCKS (%)
5
5
5
5
LOCAL BUSES (#/HR)
o
o
o
o
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
PHASING N/S
E/W
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
LEFTS/CYCLE
:4. Both Turns Protected (With Overlap)
:4. Both Turns Protected (With Overlap)
1 . 0 - 99 ( #PED/HR )
90 SECONDS
1.0
CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
THRU -RIGHT
LEFT
NORTHBOUND
1163
402
SOUTHBOUND
834
65
EASTBOUND
220
196
WESTBOUND
319
200
LEFT TURN CHECK
INPUT VOLUME
ADJUSTED VOL
CAPACITY
MOVEMENT
NORTHBOUND
376
403
o
N/A
SOUTHBOUND
95
66
o
N/A
EASTBOUND
204
197
o
N/A
WESTBOUND
207
200
o
N/A
CON22T.CMA
January
3, 1990
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
CONGRESS AVENUE AND N.W. 22ND AVENUE
1992 TOTAL TRAFFIC - PM PEAK HOUR W/IMPROVEMENTS
**********************************
LEVEL OF SERVICE D
SATURATION 87%
CRITICAL N/S VOL 1078
CRITICAL E/W VOL 364
CRITICAL SUM 1442
*************************************
LANE GEOMETRY
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
1 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 Roo 12.0
2 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0
3 T.. 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0
4 Loo 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 Loo 12.0
5 L. . 12.0
6
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
LEFT 376 55{Cl s) 16M 204) 167(207)
THRU 1690 1160 189 280
RIGHT 57(2/;,Y) 40(244) OC \ y'ii) 81e 17(;,)
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
WI;:STBOUND
PHASING N/S
E/W
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
LEFTS/CYCLE
TRUCKS (%)
5
5
5
5
LOCAL BUSES (#/HR)
o
o
o
o
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
:4. Both Turns Protected (With Overlap)
:4. Both Turns Protected (With Overlap)
1 . 0 - 99 ( #PED/HR )
90 SECONDS
0.0
CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
THRU -RIGHT
LEFT
NORTHBOUND
1013
237
SOUTHBOUND
695
65
EASTBOUND
113
196
WESTBOUND
168
200
LEFT TURN CHECK
INPUT VOLUME
ADJUSTED VOL
CAPACITY
MOVEMENT
NORTHBOUND
376
451
o
N/A
SOUTHBOUND
55
66
o
N/A
EASTBOUND
164
197
o
N/A
WESTBOUND
167
200
o
N/A
CON22T1.CMA
January
3, 1990
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
HYPOLUXO ROAD AND CONGRESS AVENUE
EXISTING CONDITIONS - PM PEAK HOUR l'i8'i Co,~f-- 1,,1J.8Ir:,q
**********************************
LEVEL OF SERVICE C
SATURATION 76%
CRITICAL N/S VOL 609
CRITICAL E/W VOL 650
CRITICAL SUM 1259
*************************************
LANE GEOMETRY
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
1 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0
2 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0
3 T. . 12.0 1. . 12.0 1. . 12.0 T. . 12.0
4 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L.. 12.0 L. . 12.0
5
6
NORTHBOUND
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
LEFT
THRU
RIGHT
187
773
0(.2.46)
137
723
0(161)
225
435
o CUI-e)
365
542
28 (16S)
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
TRUCKS (%)
5
5
5
5
LOCAL BUSES (#/HR)
o
o
o
o
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
PHASING N/S
E/W
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
LEFTS/CYCLE
:4. Both Turns Protected (With Overlap)
:4. Both Turns Protected (With Overlap)
1 . 0 - 99 ( #PED/HR )
90 SECONDS
1.0
CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
THRU -RIGHT
LEFT
NORTHBOUND
463
176
SOUTHBOUND
433
116
EASTBOUND
261
221
WESTBOUND
325
389
LEFT TURN CHECK
INPUT VOLUME
ADJUSTED VOL
CAPACITY
MOVEMENT
NORTHBOUND
187
176
o
N/A
SOUTHBOUND
137
116
o
N/A
EASTBOUND
225
222
o
N/A
WESTBOUND
365
389
o
N/A
CONHYP.CMA
January
3, 1990
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
HYPOLUXO ROAD AND CONGRESS AVENUE
1992 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC - PM PEAK HOUR
**********************************
LEVEL OF SERVICE E
SATURATION 94%
CRITICAL N/S VOL 776
CRITICAL E/W VOL 781
CRITICAL SUM 1557
*************************************
LANE GEOMETRY
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
1 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0
2 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0
3 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0
4 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0
5
6
NORTHBOUND
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
LEFT
THRU
RIGHT
226
974
0(.>'18)
167
925
0(1%)
275
500
0(155)
442
623
34(./.01)
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
TRUCKS (%)
5
5
5
5
LOCAL BUSES (#/HR)
o
o
o
o
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
PHASING N/S
E/W
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
LEFTS/CYCLE
:4. Both Turns Protected (With Overlap)
:4. Both Turns Protected (With Overlap)
1 . 0 - 99 ( #PED/HR )
90 SECONDS
1.0
CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
THRU -RIGHT
LEFT
NORTHBOUND
584
222
SOUTHBOUND
554
152
EASTBOUND
300
281
WESTBOUND
373
481
LEFT TURN CHECK
INPUT VOLUME
ADJUSTED VOL
CAPACITY
MOVEMENT
NORTHBOUND
226
223
o
N/A
SOUTHBOUND
167
152
o
N/A
EASTBOUND
275
282
o
N/A
WESTBOUND
442
482
o
N/A
CONHYPB.CMA
January
3. 1990
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
HYPOLUXO ROAD AND CONGRESS AVENUE
1992 TOTAL TRAFFIC - PM PEAK HOUR
**********************************
LEVEL OF SERVICE E
SATURATION 95%
CRITICAL N/S VOL 789
CRITICAL E/W VOL 785
CRITICAL SUM 1574
*************************************
LANE GEOMETRY
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
1 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0
2 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0
3 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0
4 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0
5
6
NORTHBOUND
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
LEFT
THRU
RIGHT
228
992
0(301)
167
942
0(1%)
275
500
0(IS7)
445
623
34 (-Z.OI)
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
TRUCKS (%)
5
5
5
5
LOCAL BUSES (#/HR)
o
o
o
o
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
PHASING N/S
E/W
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH .
LEFTS/CYCLE
:4. Both Turns Protected (With Overlap)
:4. Both Turns Protected (With Overlap)
1 . 0 - 99 ( #PED/HR )
90 SECONDS
1.0
CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
THRU -RIGHT
LEFT
NORTHBOUND
594
225
SOUTHBOUND
564
152
EASTBOUND
300
281
WESTBOUND
373
485
LEFT TURN CHECK
INPUT VOLUME
ADJUSTED VOL
CAPACITY
MOVEMENT
NORTHBOUND
228
225
o
N/A
SOUTHBOUND
167
152
o
N/A
EASTBOUND
275
282
o
N/A
WESTBOUND
445
485
o
N/A
CONHYPT.CMA
January
3. 1990
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
HYPOLUXO ROAD AND CONGRESS AVENUE
1992 TOTAL TRAFFIC - PM PEAK HOUR W/DUAL LEFTS WB
**********************************
LEVEL OF SERVICE D
SATURATION 87%
CRITICAL N/S VOL 789
CRITICAL E/W VOL 654
CRITICAL SUM 1443
*************************************
LANE GEOMETRY
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
1 R. . 12.0 R.. 12.0 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0
2 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0
3 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0
4 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L.. 12.0 L. . 12.0
5 L. . 12.0
6
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
LEFT 188(228) 127(',,,7) 235 (2.75) 445
THRU 992 942 500 623
RIGHT 56 i 0'01; 0(/%) o (157) 34 Uo')
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
WI;STBOUND
TRUCKS (%)
5
5
5
5
LOCAL BUSES (#/HR)
o
o
o
o
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
PHASING N/S
E/W
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
LEFTS/CYCLE
:4. Both Turns Protected (With Overlap)
:4. Both Turns Protected (With Overlap)
1 . 0 - 99 ( #PED/HR )
90 SECONDS
0.0
CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
THRU -RIGHT 594 564 300 373
LEFT 225 152 281 280
LEFT TURN CHECK
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
INPUT VOLUME 188 127 235 445
ADJUSTED VOL 225 152 282 533
CAPACITY 0 0 0 0
-MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A
CONHYPTl.CMA January 3, 1990
"
~--- --~--
--.---..------
I Kim/ey.Horn I
APPENDIX B
HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL INTERSECTION ANALYSIS
1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1
*********************************************************************
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30
PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... 1
AREA POPULATION...................... 150000
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... DEVELOPMENT ACCESS
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... CONGRESS AVENUE
NAME OF THE ANALyST.................. KC
DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 1/3/90
TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................. PM PEAK HOUR
OTHER INFORMATION.... 1992 BUILDOUT - PEAK SEASON
INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL
INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION
MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH
CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
EB
WB
NB
SB
LEFT
78
98
o
THRU
o
2151
1469
RIGHT
105
o
187
NUMBER OF LANES
EB
WB
NB
SB
LANES
2
2
2
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
Page-2
PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE
GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS
------- ---------- ---------------- -----------------
EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N
WESTBOUND -----
NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N
SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N
VEHICLE COMPOSITION
% SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION
AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES
----------- ------------- -------------
EASTBOUND 0 0 0
WESTBOUND
NORTHBOUND 0 0 0
SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0
CRITICAL GAPS
TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL
( Table 10-2 ) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP
-------------- -------- ----------- ------------
MINOR RIGHTS
EB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50
MAJOR LEFTS
NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50
MINOR LEFTS
EB 7.00 7.00 0.00 7.00
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... DEVELOPMENT ACCESS
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... CONGRESS AVENUE
DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 1/3/90 ; PM PEAK HOUR
OTHER INFORMATION.... 1992 BUILDOUT - PEAK SEASON
CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3
---------------------------------------------------------------------
POT EN- ACTUAL
FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE
RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY
MOVEMENT v( pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c ( pcph ) c = c - v LOS
p M SH R SH
------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------
MINOR STREET
EB LEFT 86 75 25 25 -61 F
RIGHT 116 412 412 412 296 C
MAJOR STREET
NB LEFT 108 145 145 145 37 E
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... DEVELOPMENT ACCESS
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... CONGRESS AVENUE
DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 1/3/90 ; PM PEAK HOUR
OTHER INFORMATION.... 1992 BUILDOUT - PEAK SEASON
1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-l
*********************************************************************
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30
PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... 1
AREA POPULATION...................... 150000
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... NW 22ND AVENUE
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... DEVELOPMENT ACCESS
NAME OF THE ANALyST.................. KC
DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 1/3/90
TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................. PM PEAK HOUR
OTHER INFORMATION.... 1992 BUILDOUT - PEAK SEASON
INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL
INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG
MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST
CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN
CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
---------------------------------------------------------------------
EB
WB
NB
SB
LEFT
12
22
42
45
THRU
556
871
5
5
RIGHT
24
110
96
12
NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE
EB
WB
NB
SB
LANES
2
2
2
2
LANE USAGE
L + TR
L + TR
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
Page-2
---------------------------------------------------------------------
PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft ) ACCELERATION LANE
GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS
------- ---------- ---------------- -----------------
EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N
WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N
NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N
SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N
VEHICLE COMPOSITION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
% SU TRUCKS
AND RV'S
% COMBINATION
VEHICLES
% MOTORCYCLES
EASTBOUND
o
o
o
WESTBOUND
o
o
o
NORTHBOUND
o
o
o
SOUTHBOUND
o
o
o
CRITICAL GAPS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL
(Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP
-------------- -------- ----------- ------------
MINOR RIGHTS
NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50
sa 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50
MAJOR LEFTS
EB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50
WB 5.50 5.50 0.00 S.50
MINOR THROUGHS
NB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50
SB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50
MINOR LEFTS
NB 7.00 7.00 0.00 7.00
SB 7.00 7.00 0.00 7.00
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NW 22ND AVENUE
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... DEVELOPMENT ACCESS
DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 1/3/90 ; PM PEAK HOUR
OTHER INFORMATION.... 1992 BUILDOUT - PEAK SEASON
---~---..~----~._-,--
CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3
---------------------------------------------------------------------
POTEN- ACTUAL
FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE
RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY
MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - V LOS
P M SH R SH
------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------
MINOR STREET
NB LEFT 46 75 68 68 22 E
THROUGH 6 98 93 > 93 > 87 > E
RIGHT 106 800 800 > 581 800 > 470 694 >A A
MINOR STREET
SB LEFT 50 75 63 63 14 E
THROUGH 6 104 99 > 99 > 93 > E
RIGHT 13 634 634 > 245 634 > 226 621 >C A
MAJOR STREET
EB LEFT 13 339 339 339 326 B
WB LEFT 24 570 570 570 545 A
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NW 22ND AVENUE
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... DEVELOPMENT ACCESS
DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 1/3/90 ; PM PEAK HOUR
OTHER INFORMATION.... 1992 BUILDOUT - PEAK SEASON