REVIEW COMMENTS
~.
MINUTES OF THE COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD HELD IN THE BUILDING
DEPARTMENT CONFERENCE ROOM AT CITY HALL, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
MONDAY, MAY 3, 1982 AT 7:30 P.M.
PRESENT
Col. Carn R. Reid, Chairman
Harold Blanchette, Vice Chairman
Dr. Carroll Kennedy
Danny O'Brien
Louis M. Prezioso
Chauncey M. Buck, Alternate
Meyer Rubin, Alternate
John Serrentino, Alternate
Bob Donovan
Plan Check Inspector
Building Department
~::;"~;;;jr (~J';;i
Time 11-
,
~
ABSENT
Kathleen Deneen, Secretary (excused)
Arthur Berman (excused)
.
The presence of Vice Mayor Warnke was recognized.
B ,'...
, .,
-,
""
MINUTES - COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD
MAY 3. 1982
RETURN TO OLD BUSINESS
Site Plan Approval (tabled)
Applicant:
Location:
Legal
Description:
Project
Description:
C & H Properties (Julian Bryan III, Agent)
Westside Congress Ave, 3/4 mi. south of Hypoluxo Rd
Tract "B" of the Final Recorded Plat
86 Units Cluster Housing, plus Recreational Facilities
Meadows 300
Col. Reid noted that
there was not enough
item from the table.
this was tabled at the last meeting because
information. Dr. Kennedy moved to remove this
Seconded by Mr. Blanchette, motion carried 8-0.
Mr. Bryan informed the Board that he resubmitted new copi"es of the
site plan. Col. Reid said, with the landscape plan listing the
trees, right? Mr. Bryan answered, "correct". Mr. Bryan explained
that there were five major areas of dis~ussion. Mr. Bryan recalled
that the Board asked that he show the street trees (along the
public right of way) and the open area trees. He showed those not
only on the over all site plan but he culled out the street tree
adjacent to the public right of way and the little detail. He also
showed the 23 required trees in the common area. He said what he
did there is take the 35,000 sq. ft. of common area and divide it
by 1500 and that yielded the number of trees in that area. Using
the plan, he pointed that out to the Board. Mr. Bryan said he
would simply put in, at the Board's request, the 24" hedge. He
also noted that, in addition there is of course a Health Department
requirement for a fence around that pool area, which will be shown
on the particular contractor's building plans when he submits to
the Building Department.
Mr. Bryan further explained that a typical house layout which he
had drawn at 1" to 20' shows the configuration of a typical house as
it sits on a zero lot line format adjacent to the side lot line.
He said this was the footprint of the house that the model permit
is being pulled for on Lot 51; however, he had every reason to
believe they will have a number of different configurations for that
house - for example, one may have a one-car garage, another may
have a rear patio and pool, etc. He said this is a typical minimum
planning package that they would give with each house, and the
trees and shrubs will be selected from the list deliniated up in
the landscape notes.
Mr. Bryan noted that he shows 5 different trees that they would
like to utilize which are very similar to the ones they had on
Tract "A", and the shrub material would be from the list as defined
there.
- 5 -
(~ ,'"
MINUTES - COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD
MAY 3, 1982
Mr. Bryan reported that there also was an additional note that was
not discussed by this Board but Carmen Annunziato (City Planner)
discussed with him prior to re-submitting the plans; that was the
fact (and this was unknown to him at the time) that the sprinkler
system cannot be optional - it is required - in this particular
configuration. So note #3 was changed and it simply says, "all
yard areas to be solid sod with automatic sprinklers system."
Mr. Bryan noted that he had formerly said optional and the word
'bptiona~'has been deleted since that is required. Mr. Bryan said
he believed that covers everything that was discussed at that time.
He sai~ once again these will be fee simple detached single family
dwellings.
Col. Reid said, Mr. Bryan as a developer will have the right to,
more or less, insist that people do more than the minimum in their
landscape. Col. Reid saw six shrubs and noted that they_have
nothing along the sides, so that, if these are bedrooms, there is
no planting in there to soften between the buildings. Mr. Bryan
said that is correct, because what will probably happen in this
zero lot line configuration is some kind of outdoor patio area
will be developed in the side yards since they have 12y,' there in
useable area as opposed to a single family house perhaps having
only 7' to the property line. Mr. Bryan said they will try to
encourage everybody, and Mr. Franks intends to show, probably in
a somewhat artistic format, some suggestions for how to improve
on the outdoor living area. .
Col. Reid insisted that there should be planting. He noted that
there is no planting shown on the plan but when this is developed
with such narrow lots, very possibly, it will be developed like
a Leisureville type operation whereby, between the houses, you can
reach out the bedroom and shake hands with the people - and that
is an objection. Mr. Bryan agreed that is true and that is why,
when this was reviewed, Carmen Annunziato's office reviewed the
building separations as if it were a typical single family subdiv-
ision. Mr. Bryan said Mr. Annunziato would not let them go with
any substandard set-backs; for example, they had 25' set-backs in
the front. Mr. Bryan said, as a matter of fact, the dashed lines
on the site plans that each of the Board Members were looking at
delineated a building envelope and C & H Properties has some lati-
tude in that envelope as to where they move it front to rear; but
it can be no closer than 25 in the front and no closer than (he
believed) 15 in the rear. Mr. Bryant said this is a 30' house
separation in the rear and 12y, on the side. Col. Reid said there
again there can be a problem area; in other words, some planting
in the back - these are things that should be considered by him
as a developer because it can be very objectionable to look at
rear end of houses for privacy.
Mr. Blanchette asked if they are going to allow pools in the back.
Mr. Bryan answered: as long as they don't interfere with the set-
backs, yes. Col. Reid noted that it was pretty tight in there for
a pool unless it is a Jacuzzie type thing. Mr. Bryan admitted
they are small lots; he said, let's face it, these are not intended
to be expensive homes.
- 6 -
. .' _.
~
MINUTES - COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD
MAY 3, 1982
Mr. Blanchette questioned windows on these zero lot lines. Mr.
Bryan. said they discussed it with the Building Department as well
as Planning and Zoning. Mr. Bryan informed this Board that what
he intended to do was have a high window, almost like a loft window,
on the zero lot line wall but they have specified that it will
always be above 8' off the ground; actually it will have to be on
top of the tie beam.
Mr. Rubin said there are no shrubs at allan that side of the
building. Mr. Bryan said there has to be a 3' maintenance and
access easement. Mr. Rubin suggested a plant on the right side of
the garage to get rid of the bareness on the right side of the
driveway, and even bring it closer to the door.
Col. Reid asked Mr. Bryan if he could not bring any plans of the
buildings he is proposing to build there. Mr. Bryan said they
were there in his files but he didn't have any extras.
Mr. Rubin asked how much room there was from the garage door to
the end of the building (to the corner'of the building). Mr.
Bryan answered 2' probably - something like that. Mr. Rubin
felt a few shrubs should be planted in that corner. Col. Reid
said this should be developed by the developer; in other words,
on both sides of the house and in the back of the house is those
butting on the other two. Mr. Bryan said actually, that $hould
be something you could anticipate from scale - maybe a hibiscus
that could be shaped to grow vertically to soften the corner.
Col. Reid said it doesn't matter if it extends over on the next
lot because it takes care of both of them actually - it helps
both lots. Mr. Bryan agreed.
Col. Reid said, when Mr. Bryan makes up his designs to sell these
properties to certain people, the Board feels that he should
delineate the landscape on both sides of the house and the back
where they are back to back. Mr. Blanchette noted that they
have a 10' Utilities in back there. Col. Reid felt there was
enough room to plant there (between the utilities and the building) .
Dr. Kennedy noted that there would havetobe a maintenance area
there, too. Mr. Bryan agreed and said of the 12~, 3 would be
maintenance easement or access. Col. Reid felt they could plant
along the wall even with a house there.
Mr. Bryan noted that, if you put in a schaeffelera, you have to put
it far enough away from the wall because they will encroach -
two to three feet away at least. Mr. Bryan said he doesn't want
to be the man responsible for creating a neighborhood squabble
about whose tree it is - when you start putting trees on the lot
line as a part of the standard package. He said schaeffeleras do
drop leaves all the time. He anticipates problems with that.
Col. Reid cited Leisureville as one example where people began to
plant trees in between to give them a little privacy. It was
ascertained that each individual takes care of his own property -
it is not like Leisureville. Mr. Bryan said this is not a condo
at all.
- 7 -
MINUTES - COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD
MAY 3, 1982
Mr. Prezioso noticed that there are no fences. Mr. Bryan said he
did not anticipate any. He said they discussed the possibility
of a fence. Since this side area could be an outdoor living area
it would seem somewhat of a natural to tie it together with a
visual screen or a fence at the corner. He said, not out in the
front because code wouldn't allow it. Col. Reid said Pine Tree
Villas is a good example (villas which are close together) - they
did put fencing in t !'ere.
Mr. Bryan said they had talked about offering one option that didn't
have a garage but had a one-car carport with a front wall courtyard
area - but it would be behind a front set-back.
Col. Reid advised that Pine Tree Villas do have a garage there but
they do have a private courtyard entry. Col. Reid suggested that
Mr. Bryan have a look at it. Mr. Bryan asked about the location.
Col. Reid said it is west on Boynton Road on the left side, developed
by Mangurian. Col. Reid said the first one they did was Green
Tree Villas and then Pine Tree was the next one back there.
Mr. Prezioso asked about lighting. Mr. Bryan said lighting has
already been covered in the engineering plans which were approved
and on to Bond and so forth, and it will require street lights _
it will be FPL street lights_ Mr. Prezioso asked if all the streets
will be lit there. Mr. Bryan said not all - all in this Tract -
but there will be some other tracts within the PUD that will be
private streets that will be a condominium configuration and they
might have different types of street lighting - they might not be
this high for example.
Col. Reid noticed that he had Sabal Palms. Col. Reid said he would
rather they use a foliage type tree because Saba I Palms don't do
much. Those should be shade trees. Mr. Bryant agreed and said
Sabals don't work as well on lots but they do work well around a
pool area where you can see through below the canopy of the tree.
Col. Reid said they have come
and it is part of the minutes
they make studie's and come up
development for the sides and
to their prospective buyers.
up with what the Board requested
that the Board does request that
with an overall suggested landscape
the backs of the houses to present
Mr. Bryant agreed with that.
Dr. Kennedy so moved.
Mr. Blanchette seconded. Motion carried 8-0.'"
'r
TO
,-
Carmen Annunziato
City Plannep
L Keehp
D<</,Ay Building Offieial
-,
SUBJECT:
Meadows 300 - Jraet B - Site Plan
DATE: 4-1-82
FOLD. Upon pevieuJ of the site-plan submitted, please be advised of the folZowing comments.
"'^:""'''2~~ _~NED Qr.~
~EPLY
i
t
,
t _
,
,
';
...DATE:
--.
1. Parking pequiped fop pool area; thpee (3) spaees.
2. Sidewalks pequiped.
3. No poof ovephang on zepo lot line.
Bept Keehp
---.--.]
I
(//[ ~Ju!
We'{ (
a~l~~,j.ci~~
./
)
'J
;(t~
SIGNED
,
/
---.--
FORM F259 Ah1ilab!e from GAAYARC CO., INC., Brooklyn, NY 1'232
THIS COpy FOR PERSON ADDRESSED
r
"I
!-1\.UM
TO
F I L E Carm<!.1> S. Annunziato
City Planner
SUBJECT:
Tract B Site Plan/Cluster. Housing DATE: Apr. 2, 1982_.
~OLD. With respect to the above mentioned site plan,please be
advised of comments as follows:
1. the rear setback on all lots adjacent to Meadows
Boulevard must be twenty-five (25) feet consistent with
the PUD ordinance;
2. the front yard setbacks on lots 48,53,58 and 66
must be twenty-five (25) feet consistent with the PUD
ordinance;
3. suggest applicant provide a landscaping plan for the
common area;
4. suggest applicant provide a typical landscape plan for
cluster houses; and,
5. sprinkler systems are not optional.
CSA:mpc /1. _ // - ,
FLEASE f:EPl Y TO . SIGNED L---tZ'-;:'...;';:>U'-r,l.>.(!" c.c--71~~;Z;;
....... --.. -- .-"'- -.. -",~--~,,-,~~,"-_.-..-. ._----_._-_.._."._,~..--_.._,,::::/":._-~:./-._.-
REPLY
DATE:
'.4_
SIGNED
FORM F2f>9 AVOIdable from GRAYARC CO.. INC., New Ha'lford, Conn. 06057
THIS COPY FOR PERSON ADDRESSED
./
,
....,
'.-
'.
"
(
If "I S fA FE IlOAD 7 . 2ND I-IOOR ""
POST 01 FICE BOX ~399
MARCATE. FLORIDA 33063
(3051 9723959
. ,
Jlme 30, 1981
~rr. Tom Clark, P.E.
Ci ty Engineer
Ci ty of Boynton Beach
120 Northeast 2nd Avenue
Post Office Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435
BE: C & H PLAT #1 JO #7808025
Cear Tom:
Enclosed
1"01 t wi th the
"auld then be
is the revised cost estirrate for
recreation facilities included.
$1,523,267.60.
the subject devc1o?-
The n0." Ixnd clJTOIU1 t
The nc." inspeCtion fees \iould then be $15,382.68 (1% + $150.00).
I kno.. that ~'rr. Franks had already_sul:mitted a fee chcd; b2scO on the
previous estimate. If you have not already cor.e so, I sU90cst U10t
you either return that d1eck to him and request a substitute one or
request a new d1eck for the difference.
I am also enclosing a certified sketch and legal descri?tion
of the new main recreation area duch lies outside of the oli'lt. I
. .
have sent Paul \\Qlfe(~rr. Franks' attoITley) a copy of Uus sketch so
that he ca.n prepare the instrum~nt to convey this l:md to the hC'i712-
a.,TIers' ass=ii'ltion. This recreation area is desi'Jnod [or use by all
future residents of the land in the POO lying south of t:..'le L-19
canal.
Julian Bry.:m "~s before City QJlU1cil on JlU1e 16, .It '..~lid1 Lij;~
~he'=uncil deLe.uninod that h~ h3d not 'f-:lee a su~sLmLi.ll d1.1n"e
to the Ir..'lSt.cr pLm. He plans tD be b2[ol'e the P13nnil1CJ :'.nd 7>0ning
Eoard on July 14 to, ho~fully, obtain ,l;:{)l'ovi'll of the I"inor cr-,,'J1)cs
and b3ck LccfOl-e Council on July 21 [or lhe S.LTC pUll"se. If .,11 'J~'S
"'211, ~\r. Frcmks U101 intends to PJst tJ1e bond so tl1.1t ~he P].1t
can be re=rdcd and he c:m Q'1in constnlction.
/ .~
/ ;..--.. r'l_ """ ,'i'"
I
(
r ......dnt to !'flL-!.l \...:0...1 "(Jilin for Y()\ll. .1llpnt 10n
"nd leak fon,'.>td t6 eking with you in the cory;t
you h.we any qllcs ti ons, f ce 1 f nee to c,) 11.
"') thr>L~C II\.lLtl'I"S
. ion ph,,,ce. I[
Very tn.l}Y~
.~~..
Durnel L. Carn.>h"n, P.E.
cc: f;~-$~:;;;ie;~h~s~~i~iili ~~~loS:I~~2/
~!r. Paul \';olfe (\~l th enclosure)
11r. Julian Bryan
!'!r. Peter O1eney
l'ir. Carrren KnnlDlziato
Mr. Perry Cessna
.
/ (11 ~'.
, "
. ,..J-,
*C.
"'*D.
\ }DR C & H 1'I.lli'iil,'nr'S
12/11/79
By F:.F.L. ,P.E.
'r~\', 5/5/80 J. T, 6/23/81 J,
,.. *R.cv. 6/1/81 G, P.
Jo ~78080i'5
r. P A VDfrNl'
ItB'Tl & D2scription l)Jilnt.ity Unit Cost '''''Jlmt
A. 8" shell rock base w/l 3/4"
asph. surface & 12' stab.
sub:lrade (includes all v.ork
on Congress Avenue, t~adows
Blvd. and turn lanes.) 10,699 SY @ $ 7.30 = $ 78,103.00
B. 8" shell rock base w/l!:;" asph.
surface & 1211 stab. sub::jrade
(=llector roads wi thin Tracts
A thru D.)
*Tract A - 7628 SY
Tract B - 7669 SY
Tract C - 10908 SY
Tract 0 3758 SY = 29,963 SY 'il S 6.15 = 5181,272.00
C. 6" she 11 r=k base \"/11.; 3SDh.
surfoce & 12" stab. sul:grade 5>,582 SY @ $ 5.00 = $ 47,910.00
Subtotal $310,285.00
II. MISa:u..~JEOUS C'a'JSTRtJCTION
A.
4' \"ide conc. sidC\oJalk (all
trocts)
8,123 SY @ $10.00 = $ 81,230.00
B.
5' wide conc. side~alk (along
south sice of ,.e2c1c\''S Blvd.)
1,124 SY @ $10.00 ~ $ Jl,2~0.00
Street lighting in r/w
?I'. C-A @ $1000.00 = ;: 26,')00.00
Rc."Crl2ational Area (Trocts M)
(l) 4' 1l.spl101t \\aLlchay'
(2) Grading ,5cxls
(3) 6" R=k/l" ASDhalt
(4) Clubhouse
(5) Bike Rack
(6) 'I'ennis Court
(7) Tot wt
(8) B. B.('I. Area
~
S 1 , 000. 00
$ 1 4 , 157,00
$ 9,057.60
$ 50,000.00
$ 250.00
$ 8,500.00
$ 7,500.00
$ 750,00
$--'Jl-;iI4-:-60
1. 3 ,'Ie
1332 SY
2000 S_t
@
@
@
SU. 25/SF~ :::
S6.30;SY =
525.00/5F =
=
=
=
=
1DTN. REX:: foR"'A O,<:3T
SubtotCll
, ).,'){)~ --(~ ~ J - -1:-0-
.. :.v., ...... v
-1,)i
I -"
J .-
",.. .,.
. in. DPJ\ IN!\GE \
1\. Pipe
15" C.M.P. 1,063 iF @ S 13.00 '" S 13,819.00
A *18" C.M.P. 160 iF @ S 15.00 '" S 6,900.00
**2111 C.M.P. 1,151 iF @ S 20.00 '" $ 23,020.00
**24" C.M.P. 1,190 iF @ 5 24.00 '" S 47,760.00
* *30" C.M.P. 2,030 iF @ $ 30.00 '" S 60,900.00
36" C.M.P. 1,863 1F @ $ 37.00 '" S 68, 931. 00
42" C.M.P. 1,10B LF @ $ 44.00 '" $ 48,752.00
4B" C.M.P. 196 iF @ $ 51.00 '" $ 9,996.00
60" C.;.'!.P. 394 iF @ $ 67.00 = $ 26,398_00
66" C.M.P. 30 iF @ $ 72.00 = S 2,160.00
B. StIUctures
Standard Catch Basin 47 EA @ S 700. = $ 32,900.00
5' Diarreter C. B. IlEA @ $11 00. = S 12,100.00
6' Diameter C.B. ZEA @ $lB50. '" $ 3,700.00
7' Dia'l€ter C. B. ZEA @ 52200. = $ 4,400.00
· 'Standard ~'an Hole 6 EA @ $ 725. = $ 4,350.00
5' Dia;lOeter N.H. 3 EA @ S 12 00. = 5 3,600.00
6' Diameter n.H. 1 EA @ $1900. = $ 1,900.00
7' Diarr.eter ~l. H. 1 Ell @ 52300. = $ 2,300.00
Overflew Structure 1 E.'\ @ $2300. = $ 2,300.00
Rip Fap HsachBlls 3EA @ $ 650. = S 1,950.00
AsjJ,'1a.l t A ",rons 62 E.z, @ 5 100. = $ 6,200.00
Subtotal *$ 384,D6_00
IV. \'!ATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
1\. D.I.P. : 10" (Black Bone Syston) 2,905'@ $ 17. = $ ';9,3SS.GO
8" (All Tracts) 9,OS3'@ $ 15. '" S 136, 2~5. 00
6" (,Zul Tracts) 4,.\S3'@ $ 10. ~- S ,',~, 830. 00
B. Gate Valves: 6" 31 P.; @ $ 350. = S 10,850.00
8" 18 fA @ $ .100. = S 7, .?OO. 00
10" 3 FA @ $ 450. - $ 1,350.00
C. Tc-es: 8" x 6" 17 F:; @ 1 . 36 ';\'11 = S 2,9,<2.00
6" x 611 7 cr.. "J 0.5 Ten '" $ 1 , 1 oe. [10
,
8" 4 FA @ 0.34 Ton = $ 7.13.00
10" x 8" 8 F-/\ @ 0.7 Ton '" S 1,540.00
1011 x 8" 1 E.'\ @ 0.1 Tnn '" S 220.00
D. Fire Ilydrants 22 FA @ $ 750. = $ 16,500.00
Ll_'lllJ l t~ ~,,_ L V lL-1 'J
vv ,~. ... ...
\
,
Subtotal
307, 110.00
v. SJI.NITARY SD,ER
A. 8" V.C.P.:
0-6' cut
6-8' cut
8-10' cut
10-12' cut
12-14 . cut
14-16' cut
B. 10" V.C.P.:
10-12 ' cut
12-14' cut
14-16' cut
C. ~:an fioles:
2,714 l.F @ S 7.00 = S 18,988.00
3,925 IF @ S 7.50 = S 30,223.00
2,887 IF @ S 9.25 = S 26,705.00
2,247 IF @ S 12.25 = S 27,526.00
925 LF @ S 17.00 = S 15,725.00
165 IF @ S 22.00 = $ 3,630.00
165 IF
725U'
245 l.F
@ S 15.00
@ S 20.00
@ S 25.00
= S 2,475.00
= $ 14,500.00
::= S 6,125.00
0-6:
6-8:
8-10:
10-12:
12-14:
13 E.'\. @ S 675. = S 8,775.00
14 EA @ S 900. I $ 12,600.00
=
10 EA " $ 1200. . = $ 12,OCO.00
I:'
8EA @ $ 1400. = $ 11,200.00
6EA @ $ 1700. = S 10,200.00
D. Services:
Single
**Cauble
61 EA
136 E.'\.
@ $ 170.
@ S 200.
-= S 10,370.00
= $ 27,200.00
E. Force .'lain & PaTIo StaLion:
1. 8" D.LP. F.M. 1,650 U'
2. 8" x 10" Tap TC€ \'1/8 G.V. 1 FA
3. PL<np Station (ca~,plc=te) 1 FA
@ S 15.00
@ S 1750.
@ S 45000.
~ $ ':>.1, 7S0.00
= S 1,750.00
~ $ .; '),000. 00
- - - ,-----.-
Subtotal
$311 ,SS2. 00
'IOT.~lS
I . P;Wt::.~'T
'''11. ;.nsc. CD:":S,K'JCI'ION
.. III. D:<AJ.)!X;E
.. IV. h;.'\~.t:R DIS,<<IGlll'IO'<
**
V. S,\.'.;I'1/'.'<Y Sr::':.T.R
$ ,1n,~S5.00
~0{), GS.l. 60
)s.1,33r-.OO
107,110.00
111,3'S?OO
-:'.)j-.\L
- ..,---
Sl/-;)~, '"\6;.t;O
>
STAFF COMMENTS
Meadows 300 -- Tract "B"
Building Dept.:
Subject to Memo
City Planner:
Subject to Memo
Parks & Rec.Dept.:
"
"
"
,t
J'-
/
/1,,' ..,j "-><!)
,/.. ~..I' ~'.T"'''';
I
"I
FROM
TO
Carmen Annunziato
City Planner
Be Keehr
Deputy BuiZding Offioial
SUBJECT:
Meadows 300 - Traot B - Site Plan
DATE: 4-1-82
FOLD. Upon review of the site-plan submitted> please be advised of the following oomments.
1. Parking required for pool area; three (3) spaoes.
2. Sidewalks required.
3. No roof overhang on zero lot line.
PLEASE REPLY TO
.
SIGNED
Bert Keehr
fs
REPLY
(~c
../
,
i
\
~A.
~
SIGNED
,. ~ !
FORM F269 Available from GRAYARC CO" INC., Brooklyn, NY 11232
HilS COpy FOR PERSON ADDRESSED
I
TO
-,
FROM
F I L E
Carmell S. Annunziato
City Planner
SUBJECT:
DATE: Apr.2,1982
FOLD ..
PLEASE
REPLY
DATE:
Tract B Site Plan/Cluster Housing
with respect to the above mentioned site plan,please be
advised of comments as follows:
1. the rear setback on all lots adjacent to Meadows
Boulevard must be twenty-five (25) feet consistent with
the PUD ordinance;
2. the front yard setbacks on lots 48,53,58 and 66
must be twenty-five (25) feet consistent with the PUD
ordinance;
3. suggest applicant provide a landscaping plan for the
common area;
4. suggest applicant provide a typical landscape plan for
cluster houses; and,
5. sprinkler systems are not optional.
CSA:mpc . /1_ _ ./ -/;
REPL Y TO . SIGNED ~l)q, {....?--. 'c!
, I
.;;
"I:,
SIGNED
." #-'
FORM F269 Available frllnl GRAYARC CO" INC., New Hartford. Conn 06057
THIS COPY FOR PERSON Il,ODRESSEO
.01-_,
..
MEMORANDUM
TO
Carmen Annunziato
City Planner
O"'T~
April 6, 1982
FIl.E
!'"ROM
John Wildner
Park Superintendent
'UO"CT Meadows "300" Site Plan
During our review of the site plan for Tract B of the
Meadows "300" Subdivision we noticed that preliminary
plans merely call for the construction of two small
swimming pools as the only recreational facilities
to be provided during initial phases of this project.
While the master plan does call for substantially more
recreational facilties in later phases, no indication
is made as to when these facilities will be constructed.
Since Tracts A & B combined will ha'll'E; over 200 dwelling
units, it is possible that more than 500 new residents
may have only limited recreaticnal facilities for an
extended p~riod of time. It is recommended that the
developer be required to begin development of planned
recreational facilities in adjacent tracts at the same
time he constructs both Tracts A & B.
~q ---- t/U~~
ohn Wildner
pm
cc: Charles Frederick
Recreation & Park Director
> .
'*".
,~;,!jf'.,
t,~ \.,
'~;.Si.>. ; ".\
'. .
'.,,,}.1~iliiljli~~_,.(
DANIEL CARNAHAN
CONSUL liNG ENGINEERS,
P. O. Box 4399
101 North State Road 7 2nd Floor
MARGATE, FLORIDA 33063
.
J.
[]J~uu~ITu &)[f UOO&jj~'l~[I01]Duu~[b
DATE
(305) 972-3959
ATTENTION
"'
TO
M~
GIT'(
CARIVI F.tJ A t-lI..\ l Jd Z I Ii>. -r ()
() F f:l.i')'( tJIO,J RF:At'.w
PL~t-HJIA)lr ~F.fT.
WE ARE SENDING YOU 0 Attached 0 Under separate cover via
the following items:
o Shop drawings
o Copy of letter
o .Prints
o Change order
o Plans
o
o Samples
o Specifications
COPI ES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
o For approval
o For your use
G-"1G' req uested
o Approved as submitted
o Approved as noted
o Returned for corrections
o Resubmit_copies for approval
o Submit_copies for distribution
o Return_corrected prints
o For review and comment
o FOR BIDS DUE
REMARKS_PF.J2 ,lut llt.A \
5KFTL~F.'\ ~
o
19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
p.R.yA.1 \ ~ eEA tJF.S i
Rl Dt,-. PG~Mn~)
(10 Bf: IlSFf) AS BCIlklf.:lAA'(
COPY TO
PRQOOCn40-2f~\nc.,G_,Ma$s.Ol4l1
SIGNED: ~J~
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us a on e.
1LJ.,
~
-...
f 'j
,...
,
j
BOYNTON BEACH PLl-,N:n:,G DEPi'.RTMENT
APPLICATION INFOEHAT10N FORM
NOTE: This form must be filled out completely and accurately
and must accompany all applications submitted to the
Planning Dept.
PROJECT NAME:
AGENT'S NAME:
ADDRESS:
PHONE:
OWNER'S NAME:
(or trustee's)
ADDRESS:
PHONE
II i, it
IVf,FA.D(){.;:; ?Q::) - flPA- r g
\jOU,Gf..) r RR.y,{:"lJ It(
/76 1--'//:-MPr;J ~I-E
/:.t::v b/<;;;CAVOE, f:z.o. 5~/49
I I /
<:6')- 94~ -..24{)~
(':-./ JJ PR:I>PE-tJ1~
PO. lSt:>)c /S-4b8
. Ury RLA-f l:r=J.r' J.J j:Y'Ll _
I
36S-6SS- 'SE/f)
3:46A
PROJECT LOCATION: U~~/Db Cl.,'hPf)0; "dub. . J~4 Mlth
(not legal descriptio ).--: u 'n r/
- ;:,00Tf-J o~ "y ,t:lW,,>0 IC-'CJJ6.tJ
CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:*
(if different than
agent or owner)
-
-
* This is the address to which all agendas, letters and other
materials will be forwarded.