APPLICATION
MEMORANDUM
TO: Suzanne Kruse, City Clerk
FROM: James J. Golden, Senior City Planner
DATE: May 3, 1990
SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment Application
Accompanying this memorandum you will find a copy of the
application and related documentation for an amendment to the
text of the Comprehensive Plan. The application fee for this
request has previously been transmitted to the Finance
Department.
The Planning Department has requested that the City Attorney
review this request in order to determine if a map advertisement
is needed. You will be notified as soon as a response is
received. A copy of the draft map ad is attached.
Please advertise this request for a public hearing before the
Planning and Zoning Board at the June 12, 1990 meeting and before
the City Commission at the June 19, 1990 meeting pending the
outcome of the City Attorney's ruling.
J()/)
. /~"A,-
GOLDEN
JJG:cp
Encl.
~
- ----- --------------._-_._-_...~-_._,."-----~~~--,.-
Af'FUlA'JIT
STATE Of' FLORIDA
)
) OC
)
COUI(T\' OF PAL" BEACII
DEFORE
)IE
THIS
DA\'
PER~ONALLY
APPEARED DEVRA NEWELL
SWORN, IfEPOSES AND SAYS,
,
WtlO BEINa DULY
Th8~ ~he 8ccompanY1ng Proper~y Owners Lis~ 16, ~o the
be~ ~~ hi8/h~ knov~~d9~, a comp~ete and eccur&~~ l~~~
o:! e~l property crwne-y'.G, lna:il:i.ng addres~eB e.nd propez 'l,y
contro1 numbers as record~d in ~he latest Q~~ici&l ~DX
rO~~8 in the Coun~y Courthouse ~or 8~~ proper~y within
tol"., 'l::"c.'" hu.n1& ll:"d < j(~} 1'eet 01 -thE" be~o"" descri~ed pElree~ c..~
~8nd. 4tU
The proper~y in queB~1on in X*.KXX~ described as ~o~~uw~,
Boynton Beach Comprehensive Land Use plan Opportunities
and Constraints Area 7f.
SVorn
A. 0.,
to and aubBcrib~d be10re me this
19_.
J~ t ~~p~j2r;;~ Q Q
,17na"y o~ ~
FURTHER AFFIANT SA\'ETH HOT.
~q
G~a~e oi F~oride at
wI~7
/lOTAR\' SEAL
Large
My COlllnniB~ion Exp:i..c'ea:
ftVlIUIT 1IUft'ItI;r!n'JlTl ~ n;G'RIO~
III COIIMISSION EXe1RES:JIAR, Z._JgllZ'.
_._ult--.........Iltm-
-€,-
"
Kilday ft A880ciates
Landscape Architects/ Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(407) 689-5522 . Fax: (4071 689-2592
M E M 0 RAN DUM
DATE:
March 19, 1990
TO:
Scott Miller
FROM:
Kieran J. Kilday
RE:
Six (6) annexation applications
************************************************************
My office has just spoken with the Planning Division regard-
ing your memo to Tim Cannon of March 9, 1990. Some confusion
has resulted, probably due to two similar but confusing
factors discussed at the City commission Hearing.
My request to the City commission was that the three (3)
parcels of land which were under three (3) acres in size, and
therefore not eligible for rezoning to Planned Commercial
Developments, be determined as consistent with the Comprehen-
sive Plan and, therefore, allowed to proceed according to the
less time consuming annexation and land use amendment rules
contained in the State ordinances for parcels of less than
three (3) acres in size.
The issue concerned whether or not a text amendment was nec-
essary. A text amendment would require a lengthy review
process beginning April 1st and proceeding from the City to
the State prior to any final action. At the City commission
meeting, my understanding of the City commission's motion was
that a text amendment was not necessary. The understanding
was that these parcels would be designed to the standards of
a Planned Commercial Development while not technically being
able to meet the minimum size criteria of that zoning direc-
tive. For that reason, the applications could be processed
without the need for any text amendment. This definition,
therefore, allows these applications to go forward in an
expedi tious manner. RECEIVED
... 21 1990
PLANNiNG UiPT.
Jr'
Scott Miller
Memo
March 19, 1990
Page 2 of 2
I believe this is also the intent of your memo of March 9,
1990: However, because the three acre PCD requirement and
the three (3) acre land use amendment exemption requirement
are interrelated, the planning staff has some confusion.
Based on our discussions, I indicated I would write you to
clarify this meeting. I believe the above accurately sum-
marizes the discussion that took place at the City Commission
meeting. If you are in agreement, I would appreciate your
relaying this information to the Planning Department.
Thank you
Enclosure
cc: Tim Cannon
Jim Golden
Bill Winchester
Michael Schroeder
f'L"''l'Y MANAGER'S OFFICE
l'Y OF BOj!NTON ~EACH
TO:
Tim Cannon
DATE
March 9, 1990
DEPARTMENT
planninq Director
APPROPRIATE ACTION 0'/
EVALUATION/RECOMMENDATION []
FOR YOUR FILES []
ACTION DESIRED PRIOR TO
SUBJECT: Six Annexation Applications submitted by Kilday & Associ~tes
OTHER
[]
o
o
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
NOTE AND RETURN
As you are aware the City Commission at Tuesday evenings commission Meeting
relative to the Agenda item of six applications submitted by Kilday and
Associ~tes for annexation, land use element and rezoning took the following
action:
1. Recommended to continue the processing of the six applications ana
directed staff to process accordingly.
2. Recommended that the three sites under the three acre rule be processed
accordingly as if they were in fact three acres or more.
Both of these recommending ~ct1ons by the City Commission are to occur
simultaneously, therefore, ! ask that your department move forw~rd in an
expeditious manner on these applications. Your prompt attention is
appreciated.
.
/,/~-
J'("'s;;;tr"M1her
City Manager
JSM: j c
:RESPONSE:
'?(1''1 of I
f?e"(.J-rt'r-t
734-91/ I
RECEIVED
MAR 9 199(1
PLANNII~G DEPT.
Date (Action Completed)
Signature
....,tIi....>l1I