AGENDA DOCUMENTS
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-186
.' ,
~
TO:
~
J. Scott Miller, City Manager
FROM: Timothy P. Cannon, Interim Planning Director
DATE: June 13, 1990
SUBJECT: Land use Element Amendment/Rezoning/Text Amendment
Knuth Rd PCD
Please place the above referenced item on the City Commission
Agenda for Tuesday. June 19, 1990 under Public Hearings.
DESCRIPTION: Request to show annexed land as "Local Retail
commercialt! land use and to rezone from AR (Agricultural
Residential) in Palm Beach County to PCD (Planned Commercial
Development), to allow for the construction of a 120,000 square
foot Shopping center. Project is located on West Boynton Beach
Boulevard at Knuth Road, southwest corner.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Board recommended
approval of this request, subject to staff comments, copies of
which are attached, and further suPject to developer's agreement
with residents of Banyan Creek, which is to be further
negotiated.
:z::-- /?
"'^-~ ~~ &~~
, TIMO P. CANNON
JJG:frb
Enos
A:PM90-l86
...-
PLANNING DEPT, MEMORANDUM NO. 90-161
THRU:
Chairman & Members
Planning & Zoning Board
Timothy P. Cannon 71/
Interim Planning Director
TO:
FROM: James J. Golden
Senior City planner
DATE: June 8. 1990
SUBJECT: Requests for Annexation, Future Land Use Element
Amendment, Rezoning, and Comprehensive plan Text
Amendment Submitted by Kilday & Associates for
Elsie A. Winchester, Trustee
(Knuth Road peD) - File No. 494
SummarY: Kieran J. Kilday, agent for Elsie A. Winchester,
Trustee, is requesting that a 13.87 acre parcel be annexed into
the City, rezoned from AR (Agricultural Residential) in Palm
Beach County to a PCD (Planned commercial Development). and that
the Future Land Use Plan designation for this parcel be amended
from "Conunercial 3" in Palm Beach County to "Local Retail
Corrunercial, II in the city. In addition, the applicant has
submitted an application for a Text Amendment to Area 7.j. of the
Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element Support Documents,
which currently reads as follows:
7.j. Parcel at Southwest Corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard
and Knuth Road
This is a 14 acre parcel which is currently approved
in the unincorporated County as a golf and tennis facility.
If developed as such, a Recreational Land Use and Zoning
designation would be appropriate. It is likely, however,
that the property will be developed for more intensive uses.
Regardless of how the property is developed, the owner or
developer should be required to submit an application for
annexation. The City should permit Local Retail Commercial
on the northern 225 feet of this property, in accordance
with the adopted Boynton Beach Boulevard plan. The
remainder of the property should be placed in the Moderate
Density Residential Land Use category. Building heights on
this proeprty should be limited, however, to 2 stories (25)
feet, since 1 and 2 story residences lie in close proximity
to the south and southeast.
The amendment to Area 7. j. would be necessary to allow for the
issuance of a Development Order, pursuant to Chapter 163 of the
Florida Statutes, since the proposed development is not
consistent with this section of the adopted Comprehensive Plan.
The subject parcel occupies 613 feet of frontage on West Boynton
Beach Boulevard and 985 feet of frontage on Knuth Road. (see
attached location map in Exhibit "A"). The property is currently
vacant and is occupied by exotics and several stands of slash
pines. The proposed use of this property, if rezoned, would be
to develop it for a 120,000 square foot shopping center,
inclUding two outparcels (see attached master plan in Exhibit
nB") .
Surroundinq Land Use and Zonina (see attached location map in
Exhibit "All): Abutting the subject parcel to the north is a 106
foot wide right-of-way for West Boynton Beach Boulevard.
Abutting the subject parcel to the east is the existing 60 foot
wide right-of-way for Knuth Road. Further to the east, across
Knuth Road, are the Plaza West and Knuth Road office buildings
zoned C-1 (Office PrOfessional), and the Stonehaven Planned Unit
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO, 90-161
TO: Chairman & Members. Planning & Zoning Board
June 8. 1990
Page 2
Development zoned PUD, which consists of single-family zero lot
line units (a/k/a Banyan Creek). Abutting the subject parcel
to the south and west is the Quail Ridge golf course, zoned AR
(Agricultural Residentiall in Palm Beach County.
Proposed RezonlnQ (see master plan in Exhibit "Sn): According to
Section 6-F.l of Appendix A, Zoning. the purpose of the PCD
zoning district "is to provide a zoning classification for
commercial developments that will better satisfy current demands
for conunercially zoned lands by encouraging development which
will reflect changes in the concepts and technology of land
development and relate the development of land to the specific
site, to conserve natural amenities and to allow for the
mitigation of negative impacts which result from land
development.
The proposed development is a 120,000 square foot retail shopping
center which includes two outparcels: a financial institution and
a restaurant. A ten foot wide greenbelt is provided along the
northern boundary, and along a portion of the eastern property
boundary--where the subject parcel abuts non-residential zoning
categories. A twenty-five foot wide greenbelt is provided along
portions of the east, south, and west property boundaries where
the SUbject parcel abuts residential-zoned parcels in Boynton
Beach (Stonehaven) PUD and Palm Beach County (Quail Ridge North).
The proposed perimeter greenbelt conforms to the requirements of
the PCD zoning district regulations. Access is provided by a
driveway onto West Boynton Beach Boulevard and two driveways onto
Knuth Road.
Comprehensive Plan - Future Land Use Map and Text: The property
in question is currently shown on the Future Land Use Element for
the Reserve Annexation Area as a combination of "Moderate Density
Residential" and "Local Retail Commercial", so an amendment to
the Future Land Use Element to "Local Retail Conunercial", as
requested by the applicant, would be necessary. In addition,
Area 7. j, of the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element
Support Documents contains the following language:
7.j. Parcel at Southwest Corner of Bovnton Beach Boulevard
and Knuth Road
This is a 14 acre parcel which is currently approved
in the unincorporated County as a golf and tennis facility.
If developed as such, a Recreational Land Use and Zoning
designation would be appropriate. It is likely. however,
that the property will be developed for more intensive uses.
Regardless of how the property is developed, the owner or
developer should be required to submit an application for
annexation. The City should permit Local Retail Commercial
on the northern 225 feet of this property, in accordance
wi th the adopted Boynton Beach Boulevard plan. The
remainder of the property should be placed in the Moderate
Density Residential Land Use category. Building heights on
this property should be limited, however, to 2 stories (25
feet), since 1 and 2 story residences lie in close proximity
to the south and southeast,
The applicant has submitted an application for do Comprehensive
Plan Text Mnendment to Area 7.j. above. The proposed amendment
reads as follows:
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-161
TO: Chairman' Members. Planning' Zoning Board
June 8, 1990
Page 3
7.j. Parcel at Southwest Corner of Bovnton Beach Boulevard
and Knuth Road
This is a 14 acre parcel which is currently approved in the
unincorporated County as II. golf and tennis facility, If
developed as such, a Recreational Land Use and Zoning designation
would be appropriate, It is likely, however that the property
will be developed for more intensive uses. Regardless of how the
property is developed, the applicant should be required to submit
an application for annexation, The City should permit Local
Retail Commercial eft-~fte-fter~fterft-~~5-fee~-ef-~ft~s-preper~Y7-~ft
aeeerdaftee-w~tft-~fte-adepted-BeYft~eft-Beaeft-Be~ievard-piaft.--~fte
reMaiftder-ef-~fte-preper~y-sfte~id-be-piaeed-ift-~he-Hederate
BeftsitY-Re.ideft~iai-iaftd-~se-eate~ery. BUilding heights on this
property should be limited, however. to 2 stories (25 feet).
since 1 and 2 story residences lie in close proximity to the
south and southeast.
An amendment to Area 7.j. would be necessary. given the proposed
nature of the development.
Procedure: These applications for annexation, amendment to the
Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan, text
amendment, and rezoning are being processed consistent with State
Statutes and Boynton Beach Codes, Ordinances and Resolutions as
follows:
1. F.S, 163,3161: Local Government Comprehensive
Planning and Land Development Regulation Act,
2. F.S, 166.041: Procedures for Adoption of
Ordinances and Resolutions.
3. F.S. 171.011: MuniCipal Annexation and
Contraction Act.
4. Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, Appendix AJ
Section 3A5(e): Boundary and Zoning.
· 5. Boynton Beach Ordinance *79-24.
6. Boynton Beach Resolution 176-X: Procedures
for Annexation.
Boynton Beach
Section 9.C:
Rezonings.
These regulations have been listed for informational purposes.
Briefly, these regulations require newspaper advertisements,
public hearings before the Planning and Zoning Board and Ci ty
Corrunission, review by the Department of Conununity Affairs, and
Corrunission adoption of ordinances to annex, amend the
Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element/Text, and rezone.
These procedures take approximately 8 to 9 months to complete.
7.
Code of Ordinances, Appendix A,
Comprehensive Plan Amendments/
Planned Commercial Development Standards: There
standards listed in the PCD regulations which affect
and ability to serve from a planning perspective.
standards are:
are three
the location
These three
,.
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-161
TO: Chairman' Members. Planning' Zoning Board
June 8, 1990
Page 4
1. Relation to Maior Transportation Facilities
standard number one suggests that PCD's should be located
where access to major roadways is afforded, and where
traffic levels generated in residential areas will be
acceptable. The project meets the major road access portion
of this standard. However, with respect to traffic levels
generated in residential areas, the proposed shopping center
will likely increase the volume of commercial traffic on
Stonehaven Drive, which links Knuth Road to Congress Avenue,
and serves as a bypass for the traffic signal at North
Congress Avenue and West Boynton Beach Boulevard.
2. Roadwav Improvements and Utility Extensions
Standard number two suggests that the applicant shall be
responsible for constructing and dedicating all
infrastructure necessary to serve the site, including the
dedication of additional rights-of-way and the maintenance
of roadway capacity when applicable. It can be assumed that
the applicant will construct all necessary water and sewer
mains which are needed to serve the site, In addition, the
applicant is proposing the following roadway improvements at
the intersection of West Boynton Beach Boulevard and Knuth
Road:
a. Lengthen the existing left turn lane
on Knuth Road, south approach, to
accommodate additional left turning
vehicles.
b. Signalize the intersection, when
warranted. as determined by the County
Engineer. Because of the close proximity
to the intersection with Mall Road
(Winchester Park Boulevard), these two
signals should be inter-connected.
3. The Physical Character of the Site
Standard number three is concerned with the environmental
aspects of the site. The geotechnical data submitted by the
applicant indicates that the surficial soils are the
Basinger Series which consist of nearly level, sandy soils
with rapid permeability. There are no significant organic
deposits on the site. Concerning vegetation, the site is
primarly occupied by open grassy areas with several stands
of slash pines existing on-site. The slash pines must be
preserved, relocated or replaced in conformace with the
requirements of the tree preservation code. Taking into
account the above, it can be reported that the site is
appropriate for the suggested development from an
environmental point of view.
Economic Standards: In connection with the Planned eormnercial
District Regulations, two types of economic analyses are
required: A market study and employment projections. The market
study concludes that the proposed development is economically
feasible (see Exhibit lie"). The employment projections indicate
that approximately 320 mployees will be needed for the proposed
shopping center.
f
I
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-161
TO: Chairman & Members, Planning & Zoning Board
June 8, 1990
Page 5
Issues/Discussion:
Section 9.c.7 of Appendix A. Zoning. of the Code of Ordinances.
requires the evaluation of plan amendment/rezoning requests
against criteria related to the impacts which would result from
the approval of such requests. These criteria and an evaluation
of the impacts which would result from the proposed development
are as follows:
a. Whether the proposed rezoning would be con-
sistent with applicable Comprehensive plan
Policies. The Planning Department shall
also recommend limitations or requirements
which would have to be imposed on subsequent
development of the property, in order to
comply with policies contained in the
Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed land use amendment/rezoning would not be consistent
with Area 7.j. of the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element
Support Documents. However, the applicant has submitted an
application for a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment to Area 7.j.
to amend the existing language to accommodate the proposed
development, as outlined in a previous section of this memorandum
entitled nComprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map and Text".
The Discussion of Supply and Demand for Commercial Land in the
Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element Support Documents
(Volume No.1) indicates that there may be up to 198 acres of
excess commercial land at build-out. However, this figure may be
reduced to a surplus of only 30 acres when certain adjustments
are taken into consideration. Thus, it was concluded that the
supply of commercial land in the Boynton Beach market area will
match the demand. In addition, this section of the Plan also
states the following:
"The Future Land Use Plan which is proposed for the City and
areas to be annexed by the City will accommodate all of
anticipated demand for commercial land through build-out,
Therefore. the City should not change the land use to
convnercial categories, beyond that which is shown on the
proposed Future Land Use Plan, except for minor boundary
adjustments, small infill parcels, or commercial uses of a
highly specialized nature, which have special locational or
si te requirements, and therefore, cannot be easily
acconunodated on already designated commercial area".
(page 40)
Policy 1.19.6 of the Comprehensive Plan states: "Subsequent to
Plan adoption, do not allow commercial acreage which is greater
than the demand which has been projected, unless it can be
demonstrated that a particular property is unsuitable for other
uses, or a geographic need exists which cannot be fulfilled by
existing commercially-zoned property, or no other suitable
property for a commercial use exists for which a need can be
demonstrated, and the commercial use would comply with all other
applicable comprehensive plan policies. II The proposed rezoning
would not be consistent with this policy.
Concerning the location of commercial land, this section of the
Plan states the following:
"Commercial land uses west of Interstate 95 are dominated by
the regional mall, and its satellite stores and offices.
Neighborhood Shopping centers and office buildings are
located in the vicinity of most major intersections. The
PLANNING DEPT, MEMORANDUM NO. 90-161
TO: Chairman' Members, planning' Zoning Board
June 8, 1990
Page 6
City should continue its policy of encouraging commercial
uses to be located at intersections, and discouraging strip
commercial development, due to the aesthetic and traffic
safety problems that strip development creates.
Furthermore, allowing additional commercial land use in the
vicinity of the Boynton Beach Mall would be likely to cause
traffic levels on roads in the vicinity to fall below
established levels of service. Commercial development
beyond that which is shown on the proposed land use plan
should be permitted only if the City. or the applicant for
development applies for a lower level of service, by seeking
to have properties in the vicinity approved as a regional
activity center and an Areawide Development of Regional
Impact". (pp 40-41)
In addition to the above, there will be a further discussion
concerning consistency with applicable Comprehensive Plan
policies in subsequent sections of this memorandum. At the end
of this memorandum, in the section entitled "Project Approval",
the Planning Department shall recommend limitations and
requirements which should be imposed on subsequent development of
the property, if this request is approved. in order to comply
with policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan.
Concerning consistency with the County's Comprehensive Plan, the
Palm Beach County Planning Division has been notified of the
proposed annexation. However, comments have not been received as
of this date.
b. Whether the proposed rezoning would be contrary
to the established land use pattern, or would
create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent
and nearby districts, or would constitute a grant
of special privilege to an individual property
owner as contrasted with protection of the pUblic
welfare.
As outlined in Area 7. j. of the Comprehensive Plan Future Land
Use Element Support Documents, "the City should permit Local
Retail Commercial on the northern 225 feet of this property and
the remainder of the property should be placed in the Moderate
Density Residential Land Use Category". In addition, the section
of the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element Support
Documents that discusses the location of commercial land states
the following with respect to further commercial development in
the vicinity of the Boynton Beach Mall:
The City should continue its policy of encouraging
commercial uses to be located at intersections, and
discouraging strip commercial development, due to the
aesthetic and traffic safety problems that strip development
creates. Furthermore, allowing additional commercial land
use in the vicinity of the Boynton Beach Mall would be
likely to cause traffic levels on roads in the Vicinity to
fall below established levels of service. Commercial
development beyond that which is shown on the proposed land
use plan should be permitted only if the City, or the
applicant for development applies for a lower level of
service by seeking to have properties in the vicinity
approved as a regional activity center and an Areawide
Development of Regional Impact".
,~
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-161
TO: Chairman' Members, Planning' Zoning Board
June 8, 1990
Page 7
With respect to the above, the proposed rezoning would be
contrary to the established land use pattern and would arquab1y
constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual property
owner as contrasted with protection of the public welfare.
c. Whether changed or changing conditions make
the proposed rezoning desirable.
There has been no
vicinity of this
Comprehensive Plan
desirable.
significant change in
property, since the
which would make the
conditions
adoption
proposed
in the
of the
rezoni,ng
d. Whether the proposed rezoning would be
compatible with utility systems, roadways,
and other public facilities.
The proposed rezoning would be compatible with water
and sewer systems. Concerning roadways, The Traffic
Impact Review prepared by Walter H. Keller, Jr., Inc.
indicates that the applicant' s analysis of impacted
roadways is incomplete and should be revised. A copy
of Mr. Keller's report can be found in Exhibit "0" of
this memorandum. The proposed rezoning will also consume road
capacity that will be needed to allow for commercial development
of other parcels in this area of the City which are designated
for commercial land use on the Future Land Use Element of the
Comprehensive Plan, as outlined in the attached supplement dated
June 6, 1990 from Walter Keller in Exhibit "0".
Consistent with various policies contained within the Traffic
Circulation Element of the Comprehensive Plan, a copy of the
developer's traffic impact analysis was submitted to Palm Beach
County for review and comment. Among other issues, the County
does not consider this application to have been complete prior to
February 1, 1990, the adoption date of the Municipal
Implementation Ordinance (see attached copy of correspondence
dated June 5, 1990, from the Office of the County Engineer in
Exhibit D).
e. Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible
with the current and future use of adjacent and
nearby propertie~, or would affect the property
values of adjacent and nearby properties,
The proposed rezoning would be incompatible with and would likely
have a negative impact on property values in the Stonehaven PUD,
due to the additional traffic that would be generated through
this neighborhood. In addition, the proposed development would
likely have an adverse impact on those single-family residences
that are located immediately south of the Knuth Road office
building site and across Knuth Road from the southeast corner of
the proposed Shopping center s1 te. Typical characteristics of
shopping centers that would be incompatible with nearby
residential uses include noise from trucks, noise from loading
and unloading activities, noise due to unloading of dumpsters and
removal of compactors, odors from dumpsters (which can be
detected up to 200 feet away), trash and litter accumulation and
the unpleasant aesthetics that are typical for the rear of a
Shopping center. Policy 1.17.1 of the Comprehensive Plan
provides the basis for the above comments. It is not anticipated
j
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO;. 90-161
TO: Chairman ~ Members, Planninq ~ zoninq Board
June 8, 1990
Page 8
that the proposed shopping center would have an adverse impact on
the sinqle-family residences in Quail Ridge, as the closest units
are separated from the shopping center site by a 300 foot wide
expanse of golf course, and a 6 foot high buffer wall and a 25
foot wide greenbelt are required at the rear of the shoppinq
center.
f. Whether the property is physically and
economically developable under the exist-
ing zoning.
Under the existing Agricultural Residential Zoning in Palm Beach
County, the property could be utilized for a variety of
agricultural or conservation purposes, Single-family dwellings
are permitted on a minimum lot area of 5 acres.
If annexed and developed consistent with the pOlicy for Area 7.j.
of the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element Support
Documents, the property could be developed for a maximum of 77
dwelling units under the Moderate Density Residential Land Use
category, and a PUD zoning category and a maximum of 55,170
square feet of retail floor space under the Local Retail
Commercial Land Use category and the C-2 or C-3 Zoning category.
Based on the above, and lacking any documentation to the
contrary, it is arguable that the property could be developed
economically under the existing zoning.
g, Whether the proposed rezoning is of a scale
which is reasonably related to the needs of
the neighborhood and the City as a whole.
Based on the discussion in item "an concerning Area 7. j. and the
analysis of supply, demand and location of commercial land uses
in the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element Support
Documents, it is arguable that the proposed rezoning is not of a
scale which is reasonably related to the needs of the
neighborhood and the City as a whole. Furthermore, approval of
additional retail development in this area of the City may limit
and compete with redevelopment in the Central Business District,
along U.S.l, and along Boynton Beach Boulevard east of 1-95.
h. Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere
in the City for the proposed use, in districts
where such use is already allowed.
As outlined in the discussion of supply and demand for commercial
land in the Future Land Use Element Support Documents of the
Comprehensive Plan, "the Future Land Use Plan which is proposed
for the City and areas to be annexed by the City will accommodate
all of the anticipated demand for commercial land through
build-out". This paragraph of the Plan further states tha.t lithe
City should not change the land use to commercial categories,
beyond that which is shown on the proposed Future Land Use Plan,
except for minor boundary adjustments, small infill parcels, or
commercial uses of a highly specialized nature, which have
special Ioeational or site requirements, and therefore cannot be
easily acconunodated on already designated commercial areas".
This discussion is formalized in Policy 1.19,6 of the
Comprehensive Plan. A further detailed analysis of the supply
and demand of commercial land is contained within the Future Land
Use Element Support Documents (Volume No.1) of the Comprehensive
Plan.
t
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-161
TO: Chairman & Members, Planning Zoning Board
June 8, 1990
Page 9
conclusions/Recommendations: The Planning Department recommends
that the requests for Future Land Use Element Amendment, Rezoning
and Comprehensive Plan Text 1\mendment submitted by Kieran J,
Kilday for Elsie A, Winchester, Trustee, be denied. This
recommendation is based on the following summary of findings
contained within the staff report:
1, The proposed Shopping center will likely increase the volume
of commercial traffic on Stonehaven Drive, which links Knuth
Road to Congress Avenue and serves as a bypass for the
traffic signal at North Congress Avenue and West Boynton
Beach Boulevard;
2. The proposed land use element amendment/rezoning would not be
consistent with the policy for Area 7.j. of the Comprehensive
Plan Future Land Use Element Support Documents;
3. The Discussion of supply and Demand for Commercial Land in
the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element Support
Documents indicates that there may be anywhere from 30 to 198
acres of excess commercial land at build-out. Thus, the
supply is expected to match the demand. This section of the
Plan and Policy 1.19.6 also state that the Future Land Use
Plan for the City and areas to be annexed by the City will
accommodate all of the anticipated demand for commercial land
through build-out and, therefore, the City should not further
change the land use to commercial categories, except for
minor boundary adjustments;
4. The discussion for the Location of Commercial Land in the
Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element Support Documents
states that further strip commercial development should not
be allowed in this area of the City due to the aesthetic and
traffic safety prOblems that are created and that traffic
levels on roads in the vicinity would likely fall below
established levels of service. This section of the Plan
further states that commercial development beyond that which
is shown on the proposed land use plan should be permitted
only if the City, or the applicant for development applies
for a lower level of service, by seeking to have properties
in the vicinity approved as a regional activity center and an
Areawide Development of Regional Impact.
5. The proposed rezoning would be contrary to the established
land use pattern and would arguably constitute a grant of
special privilege to an individual property owner as
contrasted with protection of the public welfare;
6. There has been no significant change in conditions in the
vicinity of this property since the adoption of the
Comprehensive Plan, that would make the proposed rezoning
desirable;
7. The applicant's analysis of impacted roadways is incomplete
and should be revised. It should also be noted that the
proposed rezoning will consume road capacity that will be
needed to allow for commercial development of other parcels
in this area of the City which are designated for commercial
land use on the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive
Plan.
-0
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-161
TO: Chairman' Members, Planning' Zoning Board
June 8, 1990
Page 10
8. The proposed rezoning would not be compatible with the
current and future use of adjacent and nearby properties, due
to the additional traffic that would be generated along
Stonehaven Drive and the proximity of the shopping center to
the homes in Banyan Creek, as provided for in Policy 1.17.1
of the Comprehensive Plan.
9. The property is physically developable under the City's
current Moderate Density Residential and Local Retail
Commercial land use designations for 77 dwelling units and
55,170 square feet of retail floor space respectively, and it
is arguable that the property could be developed economically
under the existing zoning.
10. It is arguable that the proposed rezoning is not of a scale
which is reasonably related to the needs of the neighborhood
and the City as a whole,
11. Approval of additional retail development in this area of the
City may limit and compete with prospects for redevelopment
in the Central Business District, U.S. 1, and Boynton Beach
Boulevard east of 1-95; and,
12. As outlined in the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element
Support Documents, and formalized in Policy 1.19.6 of the
Comprehensive Plan, there are adequate sites elsewhere in the
City for the proposed use, as well as in the City's Reserve
Annexation Area.
PROJECT APPROVAL
If it is the desire of the Planning and Zoning Board to recommend
approval or the City commission to approve these requests, it is
recommended that approval be contingent upon the following:
1. Approval of the Comprehensive Plan Text l\mendment to Area
7.j, as modified below:
7,j. Parcel at Southwest Corner of Bovnton Beach
Boulevard and Knuth Road
This is a 14 acre parcel which is currently approved
in the unincorporated, County as a golf and tennis facility.
If developed as such, a Recreational land use and zoning
designation would be appropriate. It is likely, however,
that the property will be developed for more intensive uses.
regardless of how the property is developed, the owner
should be required to submit an application for annexation,
If the land use is changed to Local Retail Commercial, the
property should be developed as a Planned Commercial District
(PCD). In addition, the following restrictions should be placed
on the development of the property if rezoned for commercial land
use to minimize adverse impacts on adj acent residential
conununities:
a. Building heights should be limited to one story
(maximum 25 feet).
b. Pole-mounted lighting should be provided instead
of building-mounted lighting and lighting fixtures
should be properly shielded and directed so as to
minimize glare on nearby residences.
!
!
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-161
TO: Chairman & Members, Planning & Zoning Board
June 8, 1990
Page 11
c, Screening and noise mitigation should be provided
for all exterior mechanical equipment, and all
such equipment be roof-mounted.
d. The architectural treatment at the rear of the
Shopping center is to match the front of the
Shopping center.
e. Trees planted in the perimeter greenbelt are to be
placed 20 feet on center with canopies above the 6
foot high concrete block wall that is required
adjacent to residential zoning.
2. The staff comments contained within Exhibit "E" of this
memorandum.
r.~ ~
J~S
MJ1
J. GOLDEN
JJG:cp
NOTE:
Pursuant to Section 163,3174(4)(d), Florida Statutes,
the Planning and Zoning Board, as the Local Planning
Agency, is required to make a recommendation to the
City commission with respect to the consistency of
these proposed amendments with the Comprehensive Plan,
-'t
1
. .
. -
f
"
.....
\.
..
,
,,'
,.1'" foP+"" ~ ,"
.,r
,-
7M
KNUTH ROAD peD
LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT/REZONING/TEXT AMENDMENT
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-161
THRU:
Chairman & Members
Planning & zoning Board
Timothy P. Cannon 7Li
Interim planning Director
TO:
FROM: James J. Golden
Senior City Planner
DATE: June 8, 1990
SUBJECT: Requests for Annexation, Future Land Use Element
Amendment, Rezoning, and Comprehensive Plan Text
Amendment Submitted by Kilday & Associates for
Elsie A. Winchester, Trustee
(Knuth Road PCD) - File No. 494
Summary: Kieran J, Kilday, agent for Elsie A, Winchester,
Trustee, is requesting that a 13.87 acre parcel be annexed into
the City, rezoned from AR (Agricultural Residential) in Palm
Beach County to a PCD (Planned Commercial Development), and that
the Future Land Use Plan designation for this parcel be amended
from "Commercial 3" in Palm Beach County to "Local Retail
Commercial," in the city. In addition, the applicant has
submitted an application for a Text Amendment to Area 7.j. of the
Comprehensi ve Plan Future Land Use Element Support Documents,
which currently reads as follows:
7.j. Parcel at Southwest Corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard
and Knuth Road
This is a 14 acre parcel which is currently approved
in the unincorporated county as a golf and tennis facility.
If developed as such, a Recreational Land Use and Zoning
designation would be appropriate. It is likely, however,
that the property will be developed for more intensive uses.
Regardless of how the property is developed, the owner or
developer should be required to submit an application for
annexation. The City should permit Local Retail Commercial
on the northern 225 feet of this property, in accordance
with the adopted Boynton Beach Boulevard plan, The
remainder of the property should be placed in the Moderate
Density Residential Land Use category. Building heights on
this proeprty should be limited, however, to 2 stories (25)
feet, since 1 and 2 story residences lie in close proximity
to the south and southeast.
The amendment to Area 7. j. would be necessary to allow for the
issuance of a Development Order, pursuant to Chapter 163 of the
Florida Statutes, since the proposed development is not
consistent with this section of the adopted Comprehensive Plan.
The subject parcel occupies 613 feet of frontage on West Boynton
Beach Boulevard and 985 feet of frontage on Knuth Road, (see
attached location map in Exhibit "A"). The property is currently
vacant and is occupied by exotics and several stands of slash
pines. The proposed use of this property, if rezoned, would be
to develop it for a 120,000 square foot Shopping center,
inCluding two outparcels (see attached master plan in Exhibit
"B") .
Surrounding Land Use and Zoninq (see attached location map in
Exhibit "A"): Abutting the subject parcel to the north is a 106
foot wide right-of-way for West Boynton Beach Boulevard,
Abutting the subject parcel to the east is the existing 60 foot
wide right-of-way for Knuth Road. Further to the east, across
Knuth Road, are the Plaza West and Knuth Road office buildings
zoned C-1 (Office Professional), and the Stonehaven Planned Unit
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-161
TO: Chairman & Members, Planning & Zoning Board
June 8, 1990
Page 2
Development zoned PUD, which consists of single-family zero lot
line units (a/k/a Banyan Creek). Abutting the sUbject parcel
to the south and west is the Quail Ridge golf course, zoned AR
(Agricultural Residential) in Palm Beach County.
Proposed Rezoninq (see master plan in Exhibit "B"): According to
Section 6 - F . 1 of Appendix A, Zoning, the purpose of the PCD
zoning district "is to provide a zoning classification for
commercial developments that will better satisfy current demands
for commercially zoned lands by encouraging development which
will reflect changes in the concepts and technology of land
development and relate the development of land to the specific
site, to conserve natural amenities and to allow for the
mitigation of negative impacts which result from land
development.
The proposed development is a 120,000 square foot retail shopping
center which includes two outparcels: a financial institution and
a restaurant. A ten foot wide greenbelt is provided along the
northern boundary, and along a portion of the eastern property
boundary--where the subject parcel abuts non-residential zoning
categories. A twenty-five foot wide greenbelt is provided along
portions of the east, south, and west property boundaries where
the subj ect parcel abuts residential-zoned parcels in Boynton
Beach (Stonehaven) PUD and Palm Beach County (Quail Ridge North).
The proposed perimeter greenbelt conforms to the requirements of
the PCD zoning district regulations. Access is provided by a
driveway onto West Boynton Beach Boulevard and two driveways onto
Knuth Road.
Comprehensive Plan - Future Land Use Map and Text: The property
in question is currently shown on the Future Land Use Element for
the Reserve Annexation Area as a combination of "Moderate Density
Residential" and "Local Retail Commercial", so an amendment to
the Future Land Use Element to "Local Retail Commercial", as
requested by the applicant, would be necessary. In addition,
Area 7. j. of the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element
Support Documents contains the following language:
7.j. Parcel at Southwest Corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard
and Knuth Road
This is a 14 acre parcel which is currently approved
in the unincorporated county as a golf and tennis facility.
If developed as such, a Recreational Land Use and Zoning
designation would be appropriate, It is likely, however,
that the property will be developed for more intensive uses.
Regardless of how the property is developed, the owner or
developer should be required to submit an application for
annexation. The City should permit Local Retail Commercial
on the northern 225 feet of this property, in accordance
with the adopted Boynton Beach Boulevard plan. The
remainder of the property should be placed in the Moderate
Density Residential Land Use category. Building heights on
this property should be limited, however, to 2 stories (25
feet), since 1 and 2 story residences lie in close proximity
to the south and southeast.
The applicant has submitted an application for a Comprehensive
Plan Text Amendment to Area 7. j, above. The proposed amendment
reads as follows:
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-161
TO: Chairman & Members, Planning & Zoning Board
June 8, 1990
Page 3
7,j. Parcel at Southwest Corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard
and Knuth Road
This is a 14 acre parcel which is currently approved in the
unincorporated County as a golf and tennis facility. If
developed as such, a Recreational Land Use and Zoning designation
would be appropriate. It is likely, however that the property
will be developed for more intensive uses. Regardless of how the
property is developed, the applicant should be required to submit
an application for annexation. The City should permit Local
Retail Commercial eft-~he-fter~herft-225-ree~-er-~his-~re~er~y,-ift
aeeeraaftee-wi~h-~he-aae~~ea-Beyft~eft-Beaeh-Be~ievara-~iaft~--~he
relllaiftaer -er -~he -~re~er~y-she~ia -Be -~iaeee.-ift -ehe -Meaera~e
Beftsiey-Resiaeft~iai-iafta-~se-ea~e~ery, Building heights on this
property should be limited, however, to 2 stories (25 feet),
since 1 and 2 story residences lie in close proximity to the
south and southeast.
An amendment to Area 7.j. would be necessary, given the proposed
nature of the development.
Procedure: These applications for annexation, amendment to the
Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan, text
amendment, and rezoning are being processed consistent with State
Statutes and Boynton Beach codes, Ordinances and Resolutions as
follows:
1.
F,S. 163.3161: Local Government Comprehensive
Planning and Land Development Regulation Act.
2,
F.S. 166.041: Procedures for Adoption of
Ordinances and Resolutions.
3.
F.S. 171.011: Municipal Annexation and
Contraction Act.
4.
Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, Appendix A,
Section 3A5(e): Boundary and Zoning.
.
5,
Boynton Beach Ordinance #79-24.
6. Boynton Beach Resolution #76-X: Procedures
for Annexation.
7.
Boynton Beach
Section 9.C:
Rezonings.
Code of Ordinances, Appendix A,
Comprehensive Plan Amendments/
These regulations have been listed for informational purposes.
Briefly, these regulations require newspaper advertisements,
pUblic hearings before the Planning and Zoning Board and City
Commission, review by the Department of Community Affairs, and
Commission adoption of ordinances to annex, amend the
Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element/Text, and rezone.
These procedures take approximately 8 to 9 months to complete.
Planned Commercial Development Standards: There
standards listed in the PCD regulations which affect
and ability to serve from a planning perspective,
standards are:
are three
the location
These three
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-161
TO: Chairman & Members, Planning & Zoning Board
June 8, 1990
Page 4
1. Relation to Major Transportation Facilities
Standard number one suggests that PCD's should be located
where access to major roadways is afforded, and where
traffic levels generated in residential areas will be
acceptable, The project meets the major road access portion
of this standard. However, with respect to traffic levels
generated in residential areas, the proposed shopping center
will likely increase the volume of commercial traffic on
Stonehaven Drive, which links Knuth Road to Congress Avenue,
and serves as a bypass for the traffic signal at North
Congress Avenue and West Boynton Beach Boulevard.
2. Roadway Improvements and Utility Extensions
Standard number two suggests that the applicant shall be
responsible for constructing and dedicating all
infrastructure necessary to serve the site, including the
dedication of additional rights-of-way and the maintenance
of roadway capacity when applicable. It can be assumed that
the applicant will construct all necessary water and sewer
mains which are needed to serve the site. In addition, the
applicant is proposing the following roadway improvements at
the intersection of West Boynton Beach Boulevard and Knuth
Road:
a. Lengthen the existing left turn lane
on Knuth Road, south approach, to
accommodate additional left turning
vehicles.
b, Signalize the intersection, when
warranted, as determined by the County
Engineer. Because of the close proximity
to the intersection with Mall Road
(Winchester Park Boulevardl, these two
signals should be inter-connected.
3. The Physical Character of the Site
Standard number three is concerned with the environmental
aspects of the site. The geotechnical data submitted by the
applicant indicates that the surficial soils are the
Basinger Series which consist of nearly level, sandy soils
with rapid permeability, There are no significant organic
deposits on the site. Concerning vegetation, the site is
primarly occupied by open grassy areas with several stands
of slash pines existing on-site. The slash pines must be
preserved, relocated or replaced in conformace with the
requirements of the tree preservation code. Taking into
account the above, it can be reported that the site is
appropriate for the suggested development from an
environmental point of view.
Economic Standards: In connection with the Planned Commercial
District Regulations, two types of economic analyses are
required: A market study and employment projections. The market
study concludes that the proposed development is economically
feasible (see Exhibit "C"l. The employment projections indicate
that approximately 320 mployees will be needed for the proposed
shopping center.
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-161
TO: Chairman & Members, Planning & Zoning Board
June 8, 1990
Page 5
Issues/Discussion:
Section 9.c,7 of Appendix A, Zoning, of the Code of Ordinances,
requires the evaluation of plan amendment/rezoning requests
against criteria related to the impacts which would result from
the approval of such requests. These criteria and an evaluation
of the impacts which would result from the proposed development
are as follows:
a. Whether the proposed rezoning would be con-
sistent with applicable Comprehensive Plan
Policies. The Planning Department shall
also recommend limitations or requirements
which would have to be imposed on subsequent
development of the property, in order to
comply with policies contained in the
Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed land use amendment/rezoning would not be consistent
with Area 7.j. of the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element
Support Documents. However, the applicant has submitted an
application for a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment to Area 7.j.
to amend the existing language to accommodate the proposed
development, as outlined in a previous section of this memorandum
entitled "Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map and Text".
The Discussion of Supply and Demand for Commercial Land in the
Comprehensi ve Plan Future Land Use Element Support Documents
(Volume No.1) indicates that there may be up to 198 acres of
excess commercial land at build-out. However, this figure may be
reduced to a surplus of only 30 acres when certain adjustments
are taken into consideration. Thus, it was concluded that the
supply of commercial land in the Boynton Beach market area will
match the demand. In addition, this section of the Plan also
states the following:
"The Future Land Use Plan which is proposed for the City and
areas to be annexed by the City will accommodate all of
anticipated demand for commercial land through build-out.
Therefore, the City should not change the land use to
commercial categories, beyond that which is shown on the
proposed Future Land Use Plan, except for minor boundary
adjustments, small infill parcels, or commercial uses of a
highly specialized nature, which have special locational or
site requirements, and therefore cannot be easily
accommodated on already designated commercial area".
(page 40)
Policy 1.19.6 of the Comprehensive Plan states: "Subsequent to
Plan adoption, do not allow commercial acreage which is greater
than the demand which has been projected, unless it can be
demonstrated that a particular property is unsuitable for other
uses, or a geographic need exists which cannot be fulfilled by
existing commercially-zoned property, or no other suitable
property for a commercial use exists for which a need can be
demonstrated, and the commercial use would comply with all other
applicable comprehensive plan policies." The proposed rezoning
would not be consistent with this policy.
Concerning the location of commercial land, this section of the
Plan states the following:
"Commercial land uses west of Interstate 95 are dominated by
the regional mall, and its satellite stores and offices.
Neighborhood shopping centers and office buildings are
located in the vicinity of most major intersections. The
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-161
TO: Chairman & Members, planning & Zoning Board
June 8, 1990
Page 6
City should continue its policy of encouraging commercial
uses to be located at intersections, and discouraging strip
commercial development, due to the aesthetic and traffic
safety problems that strip development creates.
Furthermore, allowing additional commercial land use in the
vicinity of the Boynton Beach Mall would be likely to cause
traffic levels on roads in the vicinity to fall below
established levels of service. Commercial development
,beyond that which is shown on the proposed land use plan
should be permitted only if the City, or the applicant for
development applies for a lower level of service, by seeking
to have properties in the vicinity approved as a regional
activity center and an Areawide Development of Regional
Impact". (pp 40-41)
In addition to the above, there will be a further discussion
concerning consistency with applicable Comprehensive Plan
policies in subsequent sections of this memorandum. At the end
of this memorandum, in the section entitled "Project Approval",
the Planning Department shall recommend limitations and
requirements which should be imposed on subsequent development of
the property, if this request is approved, in order to comply
with policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan.
Concerning consistency with the County's Comprehensive Plan, the
Palm Beach County Planning Division has been notified of the
proposed annexation. However, comments have not been received as
of this date.
b. Whether the proposed rezoning would be contrary
to the established land use pattern, or would
create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent
and nearby districts, or would constitute a grant
of special privilege to an individual property
owner as contrasted with protection of the public
welfare.
As outlined in Area 7, j. of the Comprehensive Plan Future Land
Use Element Support Documents, "the City should permit Local
Retail Commercial on the northern 225 feet of this property and
the remainder of the property should be placed in the Moderate
Density Residential Land Use Category". In addition, the section
of the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element Support
Documents that discusses the location of commercial land states
the following with respect to further commercial development in
the vicinity of the Boynton Beach Mall:
The City should continue its policy of encouraging
commercial uses to be located at intersections, and
discouraging strip commercial development, due to the
aesthetic and traffic safety problems that strip development
creates. Furthermore, allowing additional commercial land
use in the vicinity of the Boynton Beach Mall would be
likely to cause traffic levels on roads in the vicinity to
fall below established levels of service. commercial
development beyond that which is shown on the proposed land
use plan should be permitted only if the City, or the
applicant for development applies for a lower level of
service by seeking to have properties in the vicinity
approved as a regional activity center and an Areawide
Development of Regional Impact".
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-161
TO: Chairman & Members, Planning & Zoning Board
June 8, 1990
Page 7
With respect to the above, the proposed rezoning would be
contrary to the established land use pattern and would arguably
constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual property
owner as contrasted with protection of the public welfare.
c. Whether changed or changing conditions make
the proposed rezoning desirable.
There has been no
vicini ty of this
Comprehensive Plan
desirable.
significant change
property, since
which would make
in
the
the
conditions
adoption
proposed
in the
of the
rezoning
d. Whether the proposed rezoning would be
compatible with utility systems, roadways,
and other public facilities.
The proposed rezoning would be compatible with water
and sewer systems. Concerning roadways, The Traffic
Impact Review prepared by Wal ter H. Keller, Jr. , Inc.
indicates that the applicant's analysis of impacted
roadways is incomplete and should be revised. A copy
of Mr. Keller's report can be found in Exhibit "D" of
this memorandum. The proposed rezoning will also consume road
capacity that will be needed to allow for commercial development
of other parcels in this area of the City which are designated
for commercial land use on the Future Land Use Element of the
Comprehensive Plan, as outlined in the attached supplement dated
June 6, 1990 from Walter Keller in Exhibit "D".
Consistent with various policies contained wi thin the Traffic
Circulation Element of the Comprehensive Plan, a copy of the
developer's traffic impact analysis was submitted to Palm Beach
County for review and comment. Among other issues, the County
does not consider this application to have been complete prior to
February 1, 1990, the adoption date of the Municipal
Implementation Ordinance (see attached copy of correspondence
dated June 5, 1990, from the Office of the County Engineer in
Exhibit D).
e. Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible
with the current and future use of adjacent and
nearby properties, or would affect the property
values of adjacent and nearby properties.
The proposed rezoning would be incompatible with and would likely
have a negative impact on property values in the Stonehaven PUD,
due to the additional traffic that would be generated through
this neighborhood. In addition, the proposed development would
likely have an adverse impact on those single-family residences
that are located immediately south of the Knuth Road office
building site and across Knuth Road from the southeast corner of
the proposed shopping center site, Typical characteristics of
shopping centers that would be incompatible with nearby
residential uses include noise from trucks, noise from loading
and unloading activities, noise due to unloading of dumpsters and
removal of compactors, odors from dumpsters (which can be
detected up to 200 feet away), trash and litter accumulation and
the unpleasant aesthetics that are typical for the rear of a
shopping center, Policy 1.17.1 of the Comprehensive Plan
provides the basis for the above comments. It is not anticipated
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO;. 90-161
TO: Chairman & Members, Planning & Zoning Board
June 8, 1990
Page 8
that the proposed shopping center would have an adverse impact on
the single-family residences in Quail Ridge, as the closest units
are separated from the shopping center site by a 300 foot wide
expanse of golf course, and a 6 foot high buffer wall and a 25
foot wide greenbelt are required at the rear of the shopping
center.
f. Whether the property is physically and
economically developable under the exist-
ing zoning.
Under the existing Agricultural Residential Zoning in Palm Beach
County, the property could be utilized for a variety of
agricultural or conservation purposes. Single-family dwellings
are permitted on a minimum lot area of 5 acres.
If annexed and developed consistent with the policy for Area 7.j.
of the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element Support
Documents, the property could be developed for a maximum of 77
dwelling units under the Moderate Density Residential Land Use
ca tegory , and a PUD zoning category and a maximum of 55, 170
square feet of retail floor space under the Local Retail
Commercial Land Use category and the C-2 or C-3 Zoning category,
Based on the above, and lacking any documentation to the
contrary, it is arguable that the property could be developed
economically under the existing zoning.
g. Whether the proposed rezoning is of a scale
which is reasonably related to the needs of
the neighborhood and the City as a whole.
Based on the discussion in item "a" concerning Area 7.j. and the
analysis of supply, demand and location of commercial land uses
in the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element Support
Documents, it is arguable that the proposed rezoning is not of a
scale which is reasonably related to the needs of the
neighborhood and the City as a whole. Furthermore, approval of
additional retail development in this area of the City may limit
and compete with redevelopment in the Central Business District,
along U.S. 1, and along Boynton Beach Boulevard east of 1-95.
h. Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere
in the City for the proposed use, in districts
where such use is already allowed.
As outlined in the discussion of supply and demand for commercial
land in the Future Land Use Element Support Documents of the
Comprehensive Plan, "the Future Land Use Plan which is proposed
for the City and areas to be annexed by the City will accommodate
all of the anticipated demand for commercial land through
build-out", This paragraph of the Plan further states that "the
City should not change the land use to commercial categories,
beyond that which is shown on the proposed Future Land Use Plan,
except for minor boundary adjustments, small infill parcels, or
commercial uses of a highly specialized nature, which have
special locational or site requirements, and therefore cannot be
easily accommodated on already designated commercial areas",
This discussion is formalized in Policy 1,19,6 of the
Comprehensive Plan. A further detailed analysis of the supply
and demand of commercial land is contained within the Future Land
Use Element Support Documents (Volume No.1) of the Comprehensive
Plan.
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO, 90-161
TO: Chairman & Members, Planning Zoning Board
June 8, 1990
Page 9
Conclusions/Recommendations: The Planning Department recommends
that the requests for Future Land Use Element Amendment, Rezoning
and Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment submitted by Kieran J.
Kilday for Elsie A, Winchester, Trustee, be denied. This
recommendation is based on the following summary of findings
contained within the staff report:
1. The proposed shopping center will likely increase the volume
of commercial traffic on Stonehaven Drive, which links Knuth
Road to Congress Avenue and serves as a bypass for the
traffic signal at North Congress Avenue and West Boynton
Beach Boulevard;
2. The proposed land use element amendment/rezoning would not be
consistent with the policy for Area 7.j. of the Comprehensive
Plan Future Land Use Element Support Documents;
3. The Discussion of Supply and Demand for Commercial Land in
the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element Support
Documents indicates that there may be anywhere from 30 to 198
acres of excess commercial land at build-out. Thus, the
supply is expected to match the demand. This section of the
Plan and POlicy 1.19.6 also state that the Future Land Use
Plan for the City and areas to be annexed by the City will
accommodate all of the anticipated demand for commercial land
through build-out and, therefore, the City should not further
change the land use to commercial categories, except for
minor boundary adjustments;
4. The discussion for the Location of Commercial Land in the
Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element Support Documents
states that further strip commercial development should not
be allowed in this area of the City due to the aesthetic and
traffic safety problems that are created and that traffic
levels on roads in the vicinity would likely fall below
established levels of service. This section of the Plan
further states that commercial development beyond that which
is shown on the proposed land use plan should be permitted
only if the City, or the applicant for development applies
for a lower level of service, by seeking to have properties
in the vicinity approved as a regional activity center and an
Areawide Development of Regional Impact.
5. The proposed rezoning would be contrary to the established
land use pattern and would arguably constitute a grant of
special privilege to an individual property owner as
contrasted with protection of the public welfare;
6. There has been no significant change in conditions in the
vicinity of this property since the adoption of the
Comprehensive Plan, that would make the proposed rezoning
desirable;
7. The applicant's analysis of impacted roadways is incomplete
and should be revised. It should also be noted that the
proposed rezoning will consume road capacity that will be
needed to allow for commercial development of other parcels
in this area of the City which are designated for commercial
land use on the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive
Plan.
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-161
TO: Chairman & Members, Planning & Zoning Board
June 8, 1990
Page 10
8. The proposed rezoning would not be compatible with the
current and future use of adjacent and nearby properties, due
to the additional traffic that would be generated along
Stonehaven Drive and the proximity of the shopping center to
the homes in Banyan Creek, as provided for in Policy 1.17,1
of the Comprehensive Plan.
9. The property is physically developable under the City's
current Moderate Density Residential and Local Retail
Commercial land use designations for 77 dwelling units and
55,170 square feet of retail floor space respectively, and it
is arguable that the property could be developed economically
under the existing zoning,
10. It is arguable that the proposed rezoning is not of a scale
which is reasonably related to the needs of the neighborhood
and the City as a whole;
11. Approval of additional retail development in this area of the
City may limit and compete with prospects for redevelopment
in the Central Business District, U.S. 1, and Boynton Beach
Boulevard east of I-95; and,
12. As outlined in the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element
Support Documents, and f6rmalized in Policy 1.19.6 of the
Comprehensive Plan, there are adequate sites elsewhere in the
City for the proposed use, as well as in the City's Reserve
Annexation Area.
PROJECT APPROVAL
If it is the desire of the Planning and Zoning Board to recommend
approval or the City Commission to approve these requests, it is
recommended that approval be contingent upon the following:
1. Approval of the Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment to Area
7.j. as modified below:
7.j. Parcel at Southwest Corner of Boynton Beach
Boulevard and Knuth Road
This is a 14 acre parcel which is currently approved
in the unincorporated County as a golf and tennis facility.
If developed as such, a Recreational land use and zoning
designation would be appropriate. It is likely, however,
that the property will be developed for more intensive uses.
regardless of how the property is developed, the owner
should be required to submit an application for annexation.
If the land use is changed to Local Retail Commercial, the
property should be developed as a Planned commercial District
(PCD). In addition, the following restrictions should be placed
on the development of the property if rezoned for commercial land
use to minimize adverse impacts on adj acent residential
communities:
a. Building heights should be limited to one story
(maximum 25 feet).
b. Pole-mounted lighting should be provided instead
of building-mounted lighting and lighting fixtures
should be properly shielded and directed so as to
minimize glare on nearby residences.
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-161
TO: Chairman & Members, Planning & Zoning Board
June 8, 1990
Page 11
c. Screening and noise mitigation should be provided
for all exterior mechanical equipment, and all
such equipment be roof-mounted.
d. The architectural treatment at the rear of the
shopping center is to match the front of the
shopping center.
e. Trees planted in the perimeter greenbelt are to be
placed 20 feet on center with canopies above the 6
foot high concrete block wall that is required
adjacent to residential zoning.
2. The staff comments contained within Exhibit "E" of this
memorandum.
~ ~ );Jli
JAM~ J. GOLDEN
JJG:cp
NOTE:
Pursuant to Section l63.3l74(4)(d), Florida Statutes,
the Planning and Zoning Board, as the Local Planning
Agency, is required to make a recommendation to the
City Commission with respect to the consistency of
these proposed amendments with the Comprehensive Plan.
EXHIBIT "A"
LeCATION MA~'
KNUTH ROAD PCD
f.
. ".~-.'"..., ',I 011111 II I Ill' 1:]' U: -~
'~.. 1'1 " . . -, ~ .
, ': ,~'~ " " ~ 'T::r~ ..I I. .
= ,~I ~
,',," J' ~r '-Jlf I;' 1 1 ,"-, :li
,<,,';;":1 'L-~' ~ ~ I 11'1, "BovrTON BEACH ~ II)
";~ . I 4' II "0'>/ I 1 I II I r- ^ J ~
,.~~~II n, D~ ,n I ~,'
"~II II Tim+ ~ ,. C~
... . 'IT IT I...
, I II
l_rQP
'--. -.. I . I
\ " ~ "r;~
'_ ,'11"'"" -"":\ '
~,', ,,',' . ~,'.:ilIF' M" ~.
'=:l l .. -I 3 .
...,," ,
, "J!~ '..IIV,' .vum" ""'l...:ip.
-or .
, \ III
~
p
C
--i D
~
I
. ,
OI.V' J
TO .
-
ND,.
- IN
CITY ..
I
,
\ .
. E
.
.'
..
~.,
c
~ITE" · ,.~(,
~\ t!I ' ~n~}1'J.
'iO\. jT'lIiiil. ' ~
, ,- -'...-,... ,I"r:l:>
J ~~" 'j;~ ~ 'i~
.1 _~I ,I-.N\
i '. , :J:: \
_ . , Il il" '7iq~ _ D 'L.,.:h ': ..i. r ..
liT! ,...yO~r V T'\. .,.. ...
AE ,-,," I: ~ ' .:' ~,;;.~ ~~:....~ \ \, ~ ~OOo~t1JC ,fry
". ,~, II ':Jl1' 2~' 0 Ih .....~~I 'I-
--: 'M ~ \ = i g if': ~] 0 'tL. '
I' I CJ ~ \ rr Il PilI.: , ~ ,I ~
' :, '~ II 11, ( / ~: \G'"
, ' J: ~ , ~t:I \' ' u ~'Q. ~,,,' 0 01, '.o\U 0
: ~ () () II, ~ ,; D l 0 ..' '\)'0 0
L.:;. l!-....l V""" __ . (!II 11 I....... V\ , . ~
l.- " n'" " 1~\"'\~ll.~li'~.or; '~nl: - 'fmil" ~
" .' _ - : a if I~' i.UI.... ,",
, , I ~ /. " ~ ~D ,
~ . ~ (, : : : (, 'U~, ,\, .r:a.D ~"" ~ OF T~ f--j ~ :
'. '~' ltJ ~ -~( ? ~ h: ~,(r7"'-;A_'_,
~~; '-:::: v? ~elell (~T
t_ ,,, i'" ............,r~l!l..... - I I
f '-=. > /..." '
\NON_"- Ir."'r-"'.~
,-\ .'
i~'-o~~:'=~O Dr-.,~ A~;.&'.ffi
! ''\11111181' 1/14\ MILESV
-'.0. 40Q '800 1 600 EI=~T
m'
)
"'~
L..
-'~:
E~'
3 ~'i
Nl T
I ~
CI V
P
, I j
tc ~I
B
III
, I _ '<C:I
J:lU
J lie
1/,
, - \"
~
J~
J;:
(lj
(
C1
..
I
t.".'~ : I
~ ~ : t
~r -' ':.:.... J
~ tI, Il ...... )\'
~'J.:}~ ~ () :
,~~~VJ ,. ::.' " \1.
bt>. , " , I~~: __ ' :~,
, <<'I -,,",",,'. ~ .. _ ~ ____~___."....~_._ ..__.__
. ,
,~~
ri
EXHIBIT "B"
I
- -,-
, . ~"PIBiB~' ~ (f) I
.. ;; :):!~~ ~~ /l:- C )
i ~ ;1;V>lti~ -~~ i WI
, ..... IOtJ.... .....It' c.(f)
~ I ::.i;~""~ ;~<:". ~ '1
; ~'~~1;t~..~~,2'!: CI
-.:.;- ....=...Ul~C,;ll(l~ 1I}J, I
.:.,." ..t.O)t~""Vl~'" ~"n I
,"~ !f'l99"~i'5~ ~ "-
". "_. .'..g. a "I
.:~': ~"~t~l;C:~t ~ 0 I I
""'," -<'J:...:;!...~.... In
'... ~;,~... (;~ ~ i I
::~ ~~l ~;~F~ ~ 8: I
~ ~:. i;~~~i:~" 'f Z I
'~.' r;~~G.O)"- 't,~ ~ 0
_'. r" ,~.o . -. '" I
"'i'i'~i!?GSl- ~.J 11\1' I
. .,. ~e ' 0
.:.~,,~v>~\e y " I
-.,.. .' "7
.'"'IZ ~ ,~1:',., ~ (f) "d
- 't'" C\ ' :u
r ~ I'
.~
10
:~ I
, I
I
'll
::'ii
.l",
1<
G;
l'Oil
I~ ,0""
~ '
o
~
I~I
: ,
, i
, I
,
. ij
.
'"
,
.
;ri
.'
i ~
,r
"
"
,.
-,
:!e,
: I ~
,0
"
:;8
0"
0'- "
w~AJ
t_U
oiil
u
-~
.
U>
I
,
i I \
'I :
I :
. .
: (
: I
.
: I"
I ",
II
I
\~
"\,,' \
I ", ~
I . \) \
',' i'
I .',', I
\ ' .
I I I ., , 'l
, '..,
LlI ',\,
,I (~\ '\
I \-
. ~
tee'IX'"'''' ..,DO'
A~
QUAL ~OGE PL,l.. T NO 20
P8 40 P 17~
,J ~~,~~~ ~~~~~ ;W~~ r~~~ ~~~~ I~
m~~~
~.g6 ~ ~
~'~~Ir ~~p.n~ e~l(f) ,~?2 M.i:li~~T'1-' f;::.' I
~~~r 1"- ~~1J:~8~~;r~Ur~ I ~~~2~ T;f:7:";;~.,;J~Rn&'I'
L ,)
-. ~--,.- -.
-
EXHIBIT "e"
, ,
KNUTH ROAD P,C.D,
Commercial Market Analysis
May, 1990
Prepared for:
Bill R. Winchester
Prepared by:
THOMPSON CONSULTING. INC.
560 Village Boulevard
Suite 315
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
Phone: 407/697-2581
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS... ,. ."".".."..'".'" ,.
INTRODUCTION. . , , . , . . . , ,. . . , . . . , . , . , . , , , . . , , , . , , . . " , , . . , , 3
5 r TE ANAL Y5 15, . , . , , . ' , , . . , . . . , . . . , . . . . . , . , , ' . , . , . ' . . . . , . . 5
RETAIL MARKET ANALySIS..........,........,.,...,......... 6
Reta il Trade Area,.,.,.,....,................,...... 6
Population/Demographic Characteristics"..., "'" ,., 9
Retail Space Demand (Trade Area)..........,......... 18
GENERAL LIMITING CONDITIONS,......"...,.."".",......, 22
ADDENDUM.......,... "" '..... ..' , ,.",."",., """'" " 23
LIST OF EXHIBITS
PAGE
EXHIBIT 1
Site Location Map 4
EXHIBIT 2
Retail Trade Area Map 7
EXHIBIT 3
Summary of Demographic Characteristics 9
EXHIBIT 4
Existing Retail Centers Map (Trade Area) 13
EXHIBIT 5
Existing Retail Centers List (Trade Area) 14
EXH I BIT 6
Approved/In Process Retail Centers Map (Trade Area) 16
EXHIBIT 7
Approved/In Process Retail Centers List (Trade Area) 17
EXHIBIT 8
Retail Space Demand (Trade Area) 18
EXHIBIT 9
Supportable and Existing Commercial Space (Trade Area) 19
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The data and analyses upon
included in this report,
and conclusions associated
for convenient review:
which our conclusions are based are
A brief summary of the salient points
with this project is presented below
Palm Beach County is a rapidly growing and increasingly
significant economic factor in the growth of Southeast
Florida, The County contains approximately 892,500 people,
representing an 55 percent increase in population since 1980,
In addition, the population is expected to reach over
1,000,000 by 1995.
Consistent employment gains in the past decade in such
sectors as manufacturing. finance. trade and government
confirm the growing diversity of the area's economy, hence,
lessening dependence on tourism as the County's primary
economic base.
Per capita income in
an 85% increase since
power for retail goods
1990 for the trade area is $14,108 -
1980, translating into increased buying
and services.
Based on a 1990 population in the trade area of 79,692 and
supportable square feet per capita figures derived from data
available from the Bureau of Economic and Business Research,
University of Florida and The Urban Land Institute (ULI),
approximately 3,93 million square feet of retail space can be
supported,
Existing and
space in the
square feet.
approved/in process/under construction retail
trade area totals approximately 3.14 million
- Adding the 120,000 square feet of retail space proposed
for Knuth Road P.C.O, (as well as the 120,000 square feet
proposed for the Boynton Beach Boulevard P.C.O.) to the total
of 3.14 million square feet cited on the preceding page, yields
a figure of 3,38 million square feet, which indicates that even
in base year 1990, an additional 555,168 square feet~ of retail
space can be supported in the trade area,
With projected increases in population and the additional
attendant buying power in the trade area, approximately 4.58
million square feet of retail space, comprised of the general
categories surveyed, can be supported by 1995.
2
INTRODUCTION
This report presents findings and conclusions relating to the
market demand for a commercial retail development in the amount
of approximately 120,000 square feet on 13.87 acres~. The total
site development concept includes an anchor store of
approximately 34,000 square feet and ancillary retail in the
amount of 74,532 square feet. In addition, 11,468 square feet is
proposed on two (2) outparcels intended to accommodate one (1)
restaurant, and one (1) financial institution,
This well-anchored center will be in a strong market position to
attract other miscellaneous convenience as well as shoppers
goods/comparison stores as co-tenants, It is well documented
that generally speaking, anchored centers fare much better than
unanchored strip and specialty centers. Neighborhood/community
centers such as the subject center generally exhibit the highest
occupancies, with this trade area being no exception,
The subject site is located at the southeast corner of the
intersection of Boynton Beach Boulevard and Knuth Road. (See
Exhibit 1), The factors affecting the existing and future market
which would support a neighborhood/community retail development
at this location are examined in this study.
3
Exhibit
Site Location
MARTIN COUNTY
-'-'---'-'-'-j
,
I
,
J
,
r
I
i
-"._.-._._.1
,/
.I
--\.-
..
~
BROWARD
COUNTY
"
....
i
~
1
I
i, U1C~"IU
to..
I
I
i
i r--'
L._._.i
h
....
r-
h
'"
....
C)
~. H~
..
i.ClJ!oc,
.
~
f
.,
"
I~"
..,
"
...
<. ..,
... ." ..
.~ " 0
C)
l_.. .. ~ A '"
h
... ~ '"
i i
5 ..
f
"
I~"'~' "II' ..
.. ".
. .
i SITE
, ..
i i
. .
,.,
..
.. ;:
.. "
,.,
i
!
..'
-
H
ell.'
01"1
~
t
1
:u.....
i
.~.......
4
SITE ANALYSIS
The subject site falls within unincorporated Palm Beach County.
The predominant and developing land use pattern in the immediate
area is commercial, with the Boynton Beach Boulevard/Congress
Avenue commercial intersection (including commercial development
to the direct north on Congress Avenue, proximate to the Boynton
Super Regional Mall), dominating the land use pattern along those
major arterials in the area.
Major roadways which provide access to the site are Boynton Beach
Boulevard, Congress Avenue, and Military Trail. Population and
demographic information pertinent to the general trade area which
generally conforms to the suburban as well as Boynton Beach
proper area (See Exhibit 3).
The population in the area for 1990 is estimated at 79.692.* In
addition, based on 1990 figures, averaae household size is 2.17
persons and the median age is 55.1. 1990 per capita income of
$14,108, although slightly less than the County median, is
generally comparable to the County, while the median age figure
indicates an older population in the area than found countywide
(55,1 in the trade area versus 42,3 in the County),
Although the population projections utilized in our analysis are
those of a well known national firm, this firm is unfamiliar with
the dynamics of sub-area/local situations, Statistically, the
estimates for area polygons of the County which are developing at
a rapid pace, are less than estimates for the same area by local
government (i.e., Palm Beach County Metropolitan Planning
Organization). Hence, our demand estimates are conservative.
*Based on Urban Decision Systems, Inc. projections,
5
RETAIL MARKET ANALYSIS
Retail Trade Area
The subject center will be designed to capture a share of
existing as well as new purchasing power in a growing area of the
County. The trade area's population has increased by
approximately 50% since 1980 and is expected to increase by some
16% by 1995 (projections by Urban Decision Systems),
The center proposed will have characteristics of a neighborhood
center, providing for the sale of convenience goods (foods,
drugs, and sundries) and personal services (laundry and dry
cleaning barbering shoe repairing, etc.) for the day-to-day
living needs of the immediate neighborhood, However, it is
conceivable that the subject center will provide a wider range of
facilities for the sale of soft lines (wearing apparel) and soft
lines (hardware and appliances), hence, potentially exhibiting
characteristics most often associated with a community center,
Exhibit 2 depicts the trade area boundaries for the proposed
retail space. As indicated earl ier, the boundaries generally
conform to the suburban as well as Boynton Beach proper area.
For a neighborhood type center, the ULI recommends a trade area
determined by a one (1) to three (3) mile radius from the subject
site, This is appropriate, in terms of a generalization,
however, when determining actual markets, factors such as
physical barriers to access and existing competitive uses must be
'taken into account, With this factored in, the trade area is
defined for the subject site.
All existing shopping center retail
process retail space was included in
area,* The boundaries are as follows:
as well as approved/in
the survey of the trade
North:
South:
East
West:
Hypoluxo Road
One (1) mile south of Golf Road~
U .S, 1
El Clair Ranch Road
Centers included in the retail space survey are found in Exhibits
4,5,6,& 7.
*'Fi.lld--s-urvey by Thompson Consulting, Inc., 1990; Palm Beach
County Department files; Boynton Beach Planning Department,
6
Exhibit 2
Trade Area
-.-'-.-'-.-.-j
.
I
.
I
,
r
i
i
-,\,_.-._._.1
MARTIN COUNTY
..
.
,
~..I'
~..
\
\
\
\
"
,
~
i
~
fll:''''''II:O
" I~.t
.. ..,
.. ."
."
" . ,~
,., ~h' ..
I
!
..
,en
",
i
n..' 11000 U
'\''''
~
,
,
,
..
,
I
t ....
I
.n
f
...11
BROWARO-COUNTY
.
... . I
J::...'l~.....1
.._ " ""
7
..
. ,
.-,::(
. .,
l>
...
r-
l>
"'-
-l
n
"
n
,."
l>
~
..-".....
-illr
Population projections (as prepared by Urban Decision Systems,
Inc,) for the trade area are as follows: 1980 - 53,102; 1990
70,692; 1995 - 92,801, Based upon these figures, it is estimated
that the population, hence purchasing power will experience
steady growth in the next five years.
The estimated purchasing power of the resident population of the
trade area was used as the basis for determining supportable
retail space, However, it is important to note that a
substantial number of "daytime" persons in the al'ea and their
attendant buying power were not factored into our analysis, All
those persons brought into the trade area each day as employees
of other commercial retail and office developments in the area
represent a substantial secondary purchasing power base.
8
EXHIBIT 3
Summary of Demographic Characteristics
Owner occupied (%)
Renter occupied (%)
1980
Trade Area Palm Beach Co.
53,102 576,863
18.4 21.3
7 , 2 9.8
18.1 23,6
7 . 6 9 . 3
14. 7 1 2 , 6
34.0 23.3
53.3 40.2
76,5 75.3
23.4 24.7
2 . 3 1 2,42
68.5 58.1
10, 7 21,2
$ 7,646 $9,017
Characteristic
Total Persons
Age Distribution
0-17
18-24
25-44
45-54
55-54
65+
Median Age
Households
% Two or more persons
% Single person
Persons/Household
Per Capita Income
----------
Source: Urban Decision Systems, Inc,
9
EXHIBIT 3 continued
Summary of Demographic Characteristics
1990
Characteristic
Trade Area
Palm Beach Co,
Total Persons
79,692
892,357
Age Distribution
0-17
18-24
25-44
45-54
55-64
65+
15,9 18.4
5.7 7.3
19. 8 27,2
8.4 9 . 7
1 5 , 8 1 2 . 9
34.4 24.0
55,1 42.3
74.5 73.8
25,5 26.2
2.17 2,27
68.5 58,1
10.7* 21.2
$14,108 $15,653
Median Age
Households
% Two or more persons
% Single person
Persons/Household
Housing Units
Owner occupied (%)
Renter occupied (%)
Per Capita Income
----------
Source: Urban Decision Systems, Inc.
*Constant is assumed over time from 1980 Census data.
10
EXHIBIT 3 continued
Summary of Demographic Characteristics
1995
Characteristic
Trade Area
Palm Beach Co,
Total Persons
92,801
1,043,469
Age Distribution
0-17
18-24
25-44
45-54
55-64
65+
Owner occupied (%)
Renter occupied (%)
15. 7 1 8 . 3
5 . 3 7.3
19,1 26.8
10.5 11.6
15,6 12.4
33.8 23.6
54,5 43,3
74,0 73.4
26.0 26.5
2,13 2.22
68.5 58.1
10.7* 21.2*
$17,452 $21,655
Median Age
Households
% Two or more persons
% Single person
Persons/Household
Per Capita Income
Source: Urban Decision Systems, Inc.
*Constant is assumed over time from 1980 Census data.
11
EXHIBIT 3 continued
Summary of Demographic Characteristics
(Trade Area Only)
Characteristic
1990
Total Persons
79.692
Per Capita Income
$14,108
Median Age/Population
55.1
Average Size/Household
2,17
Source: Urban Decision Systems, Inc,
12
Trade Area
1995
92,801
$17,552
54.5
2',13
4 _ cv.stin~ Retail centers (irade Area)
E)<.\'dbit "'~. '"
~\
\
;
\
\l
~
,
,
1,
<
\,
"1:<
~~
~~i
-\\
\
.
,
~
c
o
....
6 5'8
<<-
co
r-
-r
co
<<-
~
;;.
h
o
r;:
l?
l'l 0
AIL>.~i\C""
o
r;:
r;:
'"
~
o:t
Ll
LltrrOH
6LVO
p..~J'c.
~ - -......,
'~ ;.t )..:,.::~~\l
Co?'<l"." t
.\ C.',l~ \C\...11'ff
\i"
Ii.
-----
21"'0
,',
v-
'"
'"
c;
;z.
c
<.,;
L>'!<C
\0"-
p..IL;-HI\C
LO",seH &\.'>10
'"
"
<<.
L\Hl0H
(0 ....."':o~~
~';.>J.>'
. l'~
>-
;::
J: ),
i
~
;:
-'
SQ9
()
...'
c:
]
;;
i '
I 1"
", '
~. 1
cU~"
flO
co
'.3
-~---_._.-._---
. 8o~n.~ol1:
. Inlet '.
, '
'.
"
"
. ."
,,'
" '
-:.'.'"
~ .:;
"
, '
~ . .', .
. , ," . -' ~
.' ."';'
, . : .~: '. : : '.' . ",
, . .,' .:::' ,",
. :;~. T.._":.. ....
,',
. ...... : ~:. - ~
....'<~.';,: :;
. :. .:.:~,:.:. #:.;~. ."
.::" <: ..' :.
. :..~...:.~
'.>,: :-:
-
,~
.........-- -
EXH I BIT 5
Map
Ref. 1t
....--..-..........-
1-
2-
3-
4-
5-'
6-
7-
8-
9-
10-
11-
12-
13-
14-
15-
16-
17-
18-
EXISTING RETAIL CENTERS
(Trade Area)
!:'""!..rn""!L.~gS',,"!,,j:,,i,g",
Meadows Square
(S.W, corner-Hypoluxo/Congress)
Catalina Center
(W. side Congress/N. of Soynton Mall)
Soynton Beach Promenade
(W, side Congress/front of Boynton Mall)
Boynton Seach Walk (Herman's Plaza)
(W. side Congress/front of Boynton Mall)
Lionel Playworld
(W, side Congress/front of Boynton Mall)
Greentree Plaza I & II
(N. side B,B. Slvd/W. of Congress)
Oakwood Square
(E, side Congress/N, of B,S, Blvd.)
Villager Plaza
(N,E, corner-B,S, Blvd/Congress)
Leisureville Plaza
(S,E, corner-S.S, Slvd/Congress)
Boynton Plaza
(S,W, corner-S,S, Blvd/Congress)
Gateway Center
(S,W, quadrant-B.S. Blvd/I-95)
Cross Creek Center
(N, side B.S. Slvd/W, of 1-95)
Soynton Trail Center
(N.E. corner-S,S, Slvd/Military)
Boynton West Center
(N,W, corner-S.B, Slvd/Military)
Applegate Plaza
(S,E. corner-B.B. Blvd/Military)
Vill age Square
(N.E, corner-Golf Rd/Military)
Westlake Hardware
(W. side Congress/S. of Woolbright)
World of Furniture Plaza
(S,W, corner-Hypoluxo/U.S, 1)
14
?_i,?"""!/.,,?,,,,,,!,,,,,
96,300
162,000
76,940
42,300
36,600
28,000
168,200
17,700
88,000
102,500
27,200
20.000
233,000
1 51,400
25,500
80,000
25,000
50,000
(EXHIBIT 5 CONTINUED)
Map
g,'=-,f....,......11.
19-
20-
21-
22-
23-
TOTAL
t'..".rn.,,=-l~,CJ.c;,,,t:,,i,g..n.,
Sam's Wholesale Club
(S,E. quadrant-I-95/Hypoluxo)
Yachtsman Plaza (N & S)
(E. side U.S. l/S, of Hypoluxo)
Boynton Beach Plaza
(N,E, corner-Boynton Beach Blvd/U,S, 1)
Sunshine Square
(S,W, corner--U,S. 1/Woolbright)
Causeway Square
(S,E, corner-U.S. 1/Woolbright),
15
?j..?;,,~,l,?,..,..L,
107,000
38,320
52,500
146,570
110,000
1.885,030
Exhibit 6 _ Approved/In Process Retail Centers (Trade Area)
tJ
o
~
HY?OLUXO ~
c
"',
"
o
"
"
"
"
It
It,
j: I
li ! .
~;.I f
! . ::::
: . ..'-i
. ' -
if ~ ......
'.
5
4
~!
I
\
OLD
BOYNTml W RD
BLVD
, '
sw
-'
<
c::
l-
i )-
c::
< LAXE
I-
~~ -'
;;.
0
c:
2"JRD
"'
'"
'"
c::
c
z
c
()
IDA
A nANTIC
tJ
W 0
ATLA~H1C"'"
o
c:
e::
l.D
l-
e::
<(
u
AVE
lOi'1SOH
BLVD
"'
>
LINTON <
I
lO~9.."">Si'O'fi'
FO
>-
S:
:t: I.
I
, .
..' -' .
~:.,\. -, '~":;''''."' ~:. .~.:."
..."!." .
.' . .., .~'.- .--
...:. .<~ . '.< ~ '".i ;~~:: ~
'~{~,,:.." ....~~..:.~
LINTON
BLVD
gf;
\\
~
~
~
.
n - --...,
5 ~ >'~~tt.'1
. C.",,::::y I
.i c~" \CU~T
~
..:- ,"
........
.: . ~. - .
.' .....
~
;;
~
:
.:: ,,:;.:,~...;.t::::'r.: '.:'
. '.' '.
I '
809
RD
ClI."'lT
-----
c::
16
. Bo'\nron
'l~j'el .
.' '
-,,"
,".. .
..... '..
--_._--.-~~----_.----_._._---_._.._--_.__.~--
EXHIBIT 7
Map
8",1',..11:
1-
2-
3-
4-
5-
6-
7-
8-
9-
TOTAL
APPROVED/IN PROCESS RETAIL CENTERS
(Trade Area)
.N...':'..rn..".L.\"..9.C;.':'.:t:.j..9..n..
Hypoluxo Shopping Center
(S.E. corner-Hypoluxo/Military)
Boynton Lakes Center
(S.E. corner-Hypoluxo/Congress)
Trails End Plaza
(E. side Military/S. of Hypoluxo)
Cocoplum Plaza
(E. side Military/S. of Hypoluxo)
Aberdeen Square
(N.W. corner-Military/Le Chalet)
Village Shoppes of Boynton
(N.E. corner-N.W. 22nd/Congress)
Catalina Center
(W. side Congress/H. of Boynton Mall)
Woolbright Plaza
(S.W. quadrant-I-95/Woolbright)
Grove Shopping Center
(N.E. corner-Old Dixie/U.S. 1)
.::3.5.."..".1..'2..,..1'...,.
87,000
133,700
100,000
130,000
71,400
175,600
80,100
315,580
160,020
1,253,400
Source: Survey research by Thompson Consulting, Inc. 1990.
17
EXHIBIT 8
Retail Space Demand (trade area)
ESTIMATE OF SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL SPACE
GENERATED BY RETAIL SPENDING PATTERNS
Estimated Retail
Space Needs Per
Retail Category* Capita (sq. ft.)
1990 Demand
For Space
(sq. ft.)
1995 Demand
For Space
(sq. ft.)
Food 5.05 402,445 468,645
Eating/Drinking 7.05 561,829 654,247
Gen'l Mdse 8.85 705,274 821,289
Apparel 3.17 252,624 294,179
Drug Store 1.72 137,070 159,618
Furn/Appl 5.69 453,447 528,038
Lumber/Hardware 4.38 349,051 406,468
Automotive 1.68 133,883 155,906
Cinema/Theater 2.11 168,150 195,910
Q1:b"r....................................~...,.9.9_..............I6..9..!.?2..??~9.L4.??
TOTAL 47.81 3,933,598 4,580,758
*Categories consist of the following subcategories:
FOOD: Grocery store; meat markets, poultry; seafood dealers;
vegetables/fruits; bakeries; delicatessens; candy, confectionery,
sundries.
EATING/DRINKING; Restaurants, lunchrooms, catering services; and
taverns, night clubs, bars and liquor stores.
GENERAL MERCHANDISE: Department stores; variety stores; limited
specialty retail; dry goods.
APPAREL: Clothing stores, alterations; shoe stores.
DRUG STORES: Drug stores; pharmacies-apothecaries.
FURNITURE/APPLIANCES: Furniture stores (new and used); household
appliances, dinnerware, etc.; music stores, radios, television,
record/tape shops and electronic supplies.
LUMBER/HARDWARE: Hardware, paints, light machinery; bicycle
shops; decorating/painting/papering/drapery; lumber/building
materials, fabrication/sales of windows, doors, cabinets, etc.
AUTOMOTIVE: Auto accessories, tires, parts, auto A/C, etc.
CINEMA/THEATER: Movies and other admission charging business.
OTHER: Second hand stores; antique shops; store and office
equipment; barber and beauty shops; cosmetics; reducing salons;
book stores; dry cleaning linen and laundry; tobacco shops;
florists; gifts; cards, novelty, hobby, stationery and toy
stores; magazines, post cards, brochures; photo and art equipment
and supplies, art galleries, etc.
Source: Retail sales and use tax business classifications;
Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida,
and year end retail sales for Palm Beach County - 1987. Dollars
and Cents of Shopping Centers, 1987, The Urban Land Institute.
1 8
EXHIBIT 9
SUPPORTABLE AND EXISTING COMMERCIAL SPACE
Retail Category
Food
Eating/Drinking
Gen'l Mdse
Apparel
Drug Store
Furn/Appl
Lumber/Hardware
Automotive
Cinema/Theater
Other
TOTAL
Vacant space
TOTAL
1990 Demand
For Space
(sq. ft.)
402,445
561,829
705,274
252,624
137,070
453,447
349,051
133,883
168,150
769,825
3,933,598
3,933,598
1995 Demand
For Space
(sq. ft.)
468,645
654,247
821,289
294,179
159 , 618
528,038
406,468
155,906
195,910
896,458
4,580,758
4,580,758
19
1990 Existing
Retail Totals
(sq. ft.)
271,240
168,070
327,500
77,230
102,865
116,820
110,550
4,260
22,000
264,625
1,465,160
267,770
1,732,930
Based on the methodology utilized in this analysis, as evidenced
by the information contained on the preceding page, an additional
2,200,668 square feet can be supported by the population in
the trade area in 1990. However, the above figure does not
reflect any of the approved/in process nor non-retail space
(financial institutions and office users that also occupy space
in these facilities) in the trade area.
Approved/in process retail center developments within the trade
area are also examined since, upon completion, each will also be
competing with the subject site for certain retail customers.
(See Exhibits 6 & 7 for these centers). An additional 1,253,400
square feet of commercial/retail uses have been approved but not
yet built/completed within the trade area. In addition, there
are 152,100 ?quare feet of non-retail space within existing
centers in the trade area.
To account for this space, the total approved/in process space,
as well as the non-retail space referenced above, should be added
to the total retail space in existing shopping centers.
Combining inventoried existing competitive space total
(including vacant space) of 1,732,930 square feet (as well as the
152,100 square feet of non-retail space in existing centers) to
the approved/in process space total of 1,253,400 square feet,
yields a total existing and committed commercial/retail space
figure of 3,138,430 square feet. By adding the retail space
proposed for development at the subject site (i.e., 120,000
square feet as well as the 120,000 square feet proposed for the
Boynton Beach Boulevard P.C.D.), the total of existing,
approved/in process and that proposed for the subject site is
3,378,430 square feet. This total is below the 1990 estimated
demand of 3,933,598 square feet and indicates that an additional
555,168 square feet can be supported in the trade area in 1990
(over and above that proposed for Knuth Road P.C.D.).
In addition, with projected population increases to 92,801
persons by 1995, an estimated 4,580,758 square feet could be
supported in the trade area.
20
Examining the individual categories of retai 1 presented in
Exhibit 9 indicates that in no category does supply exceed
demand. It is important to note that the supply side total does
not include the Boynton Beach Mall. It was not included because
this super regional center serves an area which extends into
southern Delray Beach on the south and West Palm Beach on the
north. In addition, the anchors and on-line merchants of a super
regional center do not directly compete with nearby tenants that
are located in neighborhood, community and unanchored centers.
Super regional centers attract destination oriented trips to the
major anchors with spin-offs for the "national chain" shops. The
super regional centers come closest (currently) to reproducing
shopping facilities and customer attraction once available in
Central Business Districts (CBD's).
. .
In addition, those competing shopping centers located near the
periphery of the trade area were not discounted (in terms of the
ratio of population within the Knuth Road P.c.D. trade area to
the population within the trade area of those competing shopping
centers located a good distance away from the subject site). The
further away a competing shopping center facility is, the less
direct competition it represents to the subject site.
In summary and conclusion, the subject 120,000 square foot
neighborhood center proposed at the intersection of Boynton Beach
Boulevard and Knuth Road, is in a favorable market position in
terms of location, visibility, access and timing (particularly
with projected population increases in the trade area in the near
future) .
21
GENERAL LIMITING CONDITIONS
Every reasonable effort has been made to insure that this report
contains the most accurate and timely information possible, which
is believed to be reliable. However, no responsibility is
assumed for inaccuracies in reporting by developer, developer's
agents or any other sources.
Contractual obligations do not include access to or ownership
transfer of any electronic data processing files, programs or
models completed directly for or as a by-product of this research
effort.
This report may not be used for any purpose other than for which
it is prepared. Possession of this report does not carry with it
the right of publication and its contents shall not be
disseminated to the public through advertising media, sales
media, or any other public means of communication without prior
written consent and approval of Thompson Consulting, Inc.
22
23
ADDENDUM
KNUTH ROAD P.C.D.
(May, 1990)
23
EXISTING RETAIL CENTERS
Name:
Meadows
Square
1
Catalina
Center
2
B. Beach
Promenade
3
Map Reference:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Tenant By
Retail Category:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Food
43,000
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Eat/Drink
7,000
4,710
11,540
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Gen'l Mdse
77,000
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Apparel
5,000
7,650
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Drug Store
12,000
22,315
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Furn/Appl
2,000
4,710
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Automotive
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Lmbr /H rd'.Nr /
Bldg Supply
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Financial
1,300
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Theater
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Prof/Med
Offices
9,000
8,830
11,540
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other
12,000
21,950
5,385
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Vacant
5,000
37,150
26,160
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL
96,300
162,000
76,940
EXISTING RETAIL CENTERS
Name:
Boynton
Beach Walk
4
Lionel
Playworld
5
Greentree
Plaza I & II
6
Oakwood
Square
7
Map Reference:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Tenant By
Retail Category:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Food
2,100
29,450
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Eat/Drink
7,680
4,200
21,900
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Gen'l Mdse
10,100
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Apparel
10,280
20,900
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Drug Store
5,050
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Furn/Appl
9,240
8,400
28,600
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Automotive
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Lmbr/Hrdwr/
Bldg Supply
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Financial
1,400
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Theater
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Prof/Med
Offices
2,800
19,350
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other
10,200
36,600
9,800
21,900
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Vacant
2,800
1,400
10,950
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL
42,300
36,600
28,000
168,200
EXISTING RETAIL CENTERS
Name:
Villager
Plaza
8
Leisureville
Plaza
9
Boynton
Plaza
10
Gateway
Center
1 1
Map Reference:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Tenant By
Retail Category:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Food
1,700
36,000
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Eat/Drink
1,700
13,300
8,500
4,290
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Gjen'l.Mdse
6,000
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Apparel
850
1,500
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Drug Store
10,500
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fu rn/ App 1
850
4,100
1,430
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Automotive
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Lmbr/Hrdwr/
Sldg Supply
5,550
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Financial
3,800
9,600
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Theater
16,000
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Prof/Med
Offices
7,560
1,900
13,600
8,580
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other
5,040
41,300
7,050
4,300
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Vacant
5,700
6,100
8,600
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL
17,700
88,000
102,500
27,200
EXISTING RETAIL CENTERS
Map Reference:
Cross Creek
Center
12
Boynton
Trail Center
13
Boynton West
Center
14
Applegate
Plaza
15
Name:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Tenant By
Retail Category:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Food
48,000
2,700
3,190
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Eat/Drink
3,400
27,000
21,600
6,380
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Gen'l Mdse ----- ----- 65,000 -----
--------------------------------------------------~--------------
Apparel
2,700
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Drug Store
10,000
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fu rn/ App 1
3,200
24,000
2,700
1,590
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Automotive
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Lmbr/Hrdwl'/
Bldg Supply
40,000
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Financial
9,000
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Theater
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Prof/Med
Offices
6,000
8,200
9,550
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other
12,200
18,000
13,500
3,190
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Vacant
1,200
51,000
35,000
1,600
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL
20,000
233,000
151,400
25,500
EXISTING RETAIL CENTERS
Name:
Village
Square
1 6
Westlake
Hardware
17
World of
Furniture Pl
1 8
Sam's Whole-
sale Club
19
Map Reference:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Tenant By
Retail Category:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Food
38,000
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Eat/Drink
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Gen'l Mdse
107,000
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Apparel
1,200
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Drug Store
12,000
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Furn/Appl
1,200
7,500
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Automotive
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Lmbr/Hrdwr/
8ldg Supply
25,000
40,000
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Financial
1,820
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Theater
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Prof/Med
Offices
3,640
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other
11,400
2,500
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Vacant
10,740
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL
80,000
25,000
50,000
107,000
Name:
Map Reference:
Tenant By
Retail Category:
Food
Eat/Drink
Gen'l Mdse
Apparel
Drug Store
Furn/Appl
Automotive
Lmbr/Hrdwr/
8ldg Supply
Financial
Theater
Prof/Med
Offices
Other
Vacant
TOTAL
EXISTING RETAIL CENTERS
Yachtsman
Plaza
20
7,100
8,520
3,550
3,550
4,260
5,680
5,660
38,320
Boynton
Beach Plaza
21
20,000
7,300
2,400
6,000
6,000
1,200
7,200
2,400
52,500
Sunshine
Square
22
40,000
7,800
17,600
10,000
10, 000
6,000
6,500
11,700
36,970
146,570
Causeway
Square
23
1,250
60,000
15,000
3,750
1,250
3,750
25,000
110,000
Name:
Map Reference:
Tenant By
Retail Category:
Food
Eat/Drink
l,en'l Mdse
!\ppa re 1
Drug Store
Furn/Appl
ilu t omot i ve
Lmbr/Hrdwrl
Bldg Supply
Financial
Theater
Prof/Med
Offices
Other
Vacant
TOTAL
EXISTING RETAIL CENTERS
TOTAL
271,240
168,070
327,500
77,230
102,865
116,820
4,260
110,550
26,920
22,000
125,180
264,625
267,770
1,885,030
EXHIBIT "D"
Walter H. Kellc... Jr.. Inc.
TRAFFIC lIE TRANSPORTATION. PLANNING. ENGINEERING. LAND DEVELOPMENT
May 29, 1990
Mr. Timothy Cannon, Acting Director
City of Boynton Beach Planning Department
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
Re: Traffic Impact Review - Knuth Road PCD
Dear Mr. Cannon:
Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. has reviewed the traffic impact study for the Knuth Road
PCD. The results of our review indicate the Applicant's analysis of impacted
roadways is incomplete and should be revised. The proposed site is located at the
southwest comer of Boynton Beach Boulevard and Knuth Road and includes the
development of 120,000 square feet of retail floor space. The site is currently located
in unincorporated Palm Beach County but is proposed for annexation by the City of
Boynton Beach.
The traffic study is dated January 30, 1990 and is based on the Palm Beach County
Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance #87-18. The review of conformance to
County Standards is based on all roadways in the study area while review of
conformance to the Boynton Beach Traffic Circulation Element to the City
Comprehensive Plan is applicable to roadways within City boundaries. A summary of
our review is provided in the following text.
Existing Conditions - The Applicant's analysis of existing traffic volumes is based on
1989 traffic counts and is consistent with data provided by Palm Beach County and the
Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). Existing traffic volumes are also
provided on Knuth Road north and south of Boynton Beach Boulevard. It is assumed
these counts were performed by the consultant and traffic count summary sheets
should be provided in the Appendix.
The analysis of traffic conditions is based on the LOS "C" capacities as provided in
both the County Traffic Performance Standards and the City Traffic Circulation
Element. The analysis shows three over capacity roadway links including Boynton
Beach Boulevard between Old Boynton Road and 1-95, Boynton Beach Boulevard
between Military Trail and El Clair Ranch Road and Military Trail south of Golf Road.
Programmed Improvements - There are a number of programmed and planned
improvements located in the Applicant's study area, most of which have been
identified in the traffic impact study. Table 1 provides a summary of these
improvements and indicates those projects considered assured per County standards.
continued...
10211 W. SAMPLE ROAD, SUITE 204. P.O. BOX 9740
CORAL SPRINGS, FLORIDA 33075-9740
(305) 755-3822. (407) 732-7844 (Palm Beach)
Walter H. Keller Jr.. Inc.
Mr. Timothy Cannon
May 29, 1990
page two
Table 1. Programmed Roadway Improvements
Roadway
Section
Imprvmnt
Boynton Beach Blvd
Acme Dairy Rd to Jog Rd
Jog Rd to Military Tr
at Florida's Turnpike
Old Boynton Rd to 1-95
+2L(4LD)
+4L(6LD)
Interchange
+2L(6LD)
Military Tr
Hypoluxo Rd to Boynton Beach Bd
Boynton Beach Bd to Stiener Rd
+2L(6LD)
+2L(6LD)
Old Boynton Rd
Military Tr to Knuth Rd
+2L(4LD)
Congress Ave
Miner Rd to NW 22nd Ave
NW 22nd Ave to Boynton Beach Bd
L28 Canal to L30 Canal
+2L(6LD)
+2L(6LD)
+2L(6LD)
Woolbright Rd
Military Tr to Congress Ave
Congress Ave to 1-95
NC(4LD)
+2L(6LD)
Source: Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc.
Palm Beach COWlty Engineering
Florida Department of Transponation
Const
Date
FY 90/91
FY 90/91
FY 90/91
FY 90/91
D/C
FY 91192
FY 91192
1990
1991
FY 91/92
FY 90/91
1991
Respons
Agency Assured
FOOT Yes
FOOT Yes
FOOT Yes
County Yes
County Yes
County Yes
County Yes
Devel No
Devel Yes
County Yes
County Yes
Devel No
Note: ule - Under Construction
Balded projects not analyzed by
Applicant
Table 2 shows the planned improvements to Woolbright Road from Congress Avenue
to 1-95 and Congress Avenue from Miner Road to NW 22nd Avenue are not assured.
Note the improvement on Boynton Beach Boulevard from Jog Road to Military Trail
will provide a six lane divided facility as opposed to the four lane improvement
discussed in the Applicant Study.
Trip Generation - The Applicant's estimate of project trip generation indicates a total
of 8,365 total daily trips including 3,547 captured trips from existing traffic and 4,818
new external trips. The Applicant analysis of PM peak hour traffic shows 336 vehicles
accessing the site and 349 vehicle trips leaving the site. These estimates are based
on the 4th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation
Manual and are acceptable.
Trip Distribution and Assignment - The Applicant's analysis of trip distribution and
assignment is reasonable, however the assignment of traffic to Lawrence Road is
heavy compared to Military Trail. The Applicant shows a significant number of project
trips accessing Military Trail via Boynton Beach Beach Boulevard, Lawrence Road
and Old Boynton Road. The shortest and most convenient path for this traffic is
continued...
Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc.
Mr. Timothy Cannon
May 29, 1990
page three
Boynton Beach Boulevard direct to Military Trail. A revised assignment would cause
Military Trail from Boynton Beach Boulevard to NW 22nd Street to be considered
"Significant" per the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards.
The Applicant's assignment of peak hour traffic shown on Figure 3 (page 6) of the
traffic impact study is not consistent with the PM peak: hour trip generation estimates.
Background Traffic Analysis - The Applicant's analysis of background traffic is based
on a 1993 buildout year, a historical link analysis and committed traffic per the
Aberdeen, Palm Isles, Rainbow Lakes, Sun Valley, Indian Springs and Quantum Park
developments. The results of the background traffic analysis are acceptable and
indicate a significant amount of traffic growth on all roadways.
The projected traffic volume on Boynton Beach Boulevard should be revised to indicate
traffic diversion due to the extension of Woolbright Road from Congress Avenue to
Military Trail. This improvement should reduce traffic on Boynton Beach Boulevard.
Traffic Impacts - The Applicant's analysis of projected traffic impacts is incomplete
based on the assignment of project traffic and the identification of "Significant" links
as shown on Figure 3 (page 6) of the traffic impact study. Table 2 summarizes the
Applicant's analysis and shows 8 links where the analysis of total traffic is not
provided. Some of these links are discussed in the text of the report and background
traffic is shown in the Appendix but are not included on Figure 4 (page 8). For the
purposes of this review Table 2 also includes all assured roadway improvements.
The results indicate Congress Avenue from NW 22nd Avenue to Old Boynton Road is
over capacity. The Applicant fails to identify this and discusses two different links
which are not shown on Figure 4. These links include Boynton Beach Boulevard from
Old Boynton Road to 1-95 and Boynton Beach Boulevard from Military Trail to El Clair
Ranch Road. The Applicant's analysis on the segment west of Military Trail is
incorrect because the roadway improvement is to six lane this facility thereby
accommodating projected traffic. It is assumed the Applicant's conclusion on the
segment between 1-95 and Old Boynton Road is based on a total volume of 61,613
which includes the background traffic shown on Appendix E.
Note also two Military Trail links, from Boynton Beach Boulevard to Old Boynton
Road and from Old Boynton Road to NW 22nd A venue should be added to the Table
per comments made under the Distribution and Assignment subtitle.
Site Access - The traffic study shows three unsignalized access drives, one restricted
access on Boynton Beach Boulevard and two unrestricted access drives on Knuth
Road. The analysis of peak: hour traffic operations is based on an unsignalized and
continued...
Walter H . Keller Jr ., Inc .
Mr. Timothy Cannon
May 24,1990
page four
Table 2. Analysis of Significant Links
1993
County
Exist Back Proj Total LOSC
Roadway From To ADT ADT ADT ADT Cap VIC
Boynton Beach Bd Jog Rd El Clair Ranch Rd 10,500 Inc 198 - - -
El Clair Ranch Rd Military Tr 20,636 Ine 243 - - -
Military Tr Lawrence Rd 24,420 7,232 1,083 32,735 46,400 0.71
Lawrence Rd Knuth Rd 27,365 8,104 1,604 37,073 46,400 0.80
Knuth Rd Mall Rd 27,365 8,104 2,575 38,044 46,400 0.82
Mall Rd Congress Avenue 27,365 8,104 2,431 37,900 46,400 0.82
Congress Avenue Old Boynton Rd 31.972 12,337 929 45,238 46,400 0.97
Old Boynton Rd 1-95 43,886 Ine 794 - - -
Congress Avenue NW 22nd Ave Old Boynton Rd 29,808 19,263 535 49,606 46,400 1.07
Old Boynton Rd Boynton Beach Bd 29,808 15,770 611 46.189 46,400 1.00
Boynton Beach Blvd Woolbright Rd 25,170 11,414 842 37,426 46,400 0.81
Woolbright Rd Golf Rd 25,170 Inc 490 - - -
Lawrence Rd NW 22nd Ave Old Boynton Rd 8,680 Ine 384 - - -
Old Boynton Rd Boynton Beach Bd 8,680 2,912 472 12,064 13,100 0.92
Knuth Rd Old Boynton Rd Boynton Bch Bd 668 Ine 341 . - -
2,042 Ine Ine - - -
Old Boynton Rd Military Trail Lawrence Rd 11,383 3,261 138 14,782 30,000 0.49
Lawrence Rd Mall Rd 11,383 3,261 164 14,808 30,000 0.49
NW 22nd Ave Military Tr Lawrence Rd 6,412 Inc 192 - - -
Note: Balded links are significant links not
analyzed by the Applicant.
Ine ~ Incomplete
signalized intersection analysis. The analysis results indicates left turn movements
from the minor street will operate poorly under un signalized conditions and improve
measurably with a traffic signal in place.
Source: Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc.
K.S. Rogers, Consulting Engineer, Inc.
Note the turning movement volumes shown in the analysis are not consistent with
peak hour trip generation estimates. However, this should not have a bearing on the
results since the volumes in the analysis are overestimated.
Conformance to City and County Standards - The analysis on Table 2 shows that the
Congress Avenue link between NW 22nd Avenue and Old Boynton Road will be
operating over capacity at the improved six lane capacity. In this instance, the project
would have to be reduced by 13% to meet the 1 % LOS "C" impact.
continued...
Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc.
Mr. Timothy Cannon
May 29, 1990
page five
However, the project does meet City Standards because LOS "D" is acceptable on
this link. The results of this analysis are incomplete because so many impacted
roadways are not included in the analysis of future conditions.
Summary - The results of this review indicate a more expanded traffic study should be
provided. The revised analysis should provide projected LOS for all roadways in the
radius of development influence and "1 %" impact areas. The expanded study should
address all comments within this letter. Also note, if the revised study addressed the
current Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards the Applicant's radius of
influence is reduced to 2 miles and all other links over 1 % capacity.
A revised analysis shall also include revisions relative to comments contained within
this letter including: a revised analysis based on all assured construction projects; an
appropriate assignment to Lawrence Road and Military Trail; a revised peak hour
analysis and revised peak: hour turning movements on Figure 5.
If you have any questions please contact me at (305) 732-7844.
S~~~
Walter H. Keller Jr., PE, AICP
President
WHK/us
l
",',"""'" "
1.1'_, ,">1. '., "'1,1 "I
from: f1bJton Inte,I""
~--_.__._-~-
7~~ 3866
,'Oyt' .:.. Of )
____Quality: >tandal'd
June 6, 1990
Mr. Jim Golden,
PlaullingDepartment
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
Re: Traffic Impact Review
Knuth Road PCD
Boynton Beach Blvd PCD
Dear Mr. Golden:
,I!js per your request, the traffic impact of the proposed rezoning of the above
referenced sites on projected 2010 traffic has been reviewed. Table 1 below indicates
the cummulative impact of rezoning the Boynon Beach Boulevard site (Residential
10.8 to Commercial) and the Knuth Road site (Residential 7.2 and Commercial to
Commercial) would increase projected traffic by approximately 6,000 trips.
Tabl~ 1. ln~r~a.cd Trip Proj~~tion E.timatc.
CW'renl Zoning
Proposed I
New Exl
Trip~ Difference,
,
~ Proj eel Size Units
I
I
i Knuth Rd peD 77 MPDU
I 41,380 Sqfl Corn
Trips
I Toml Knuth Rd
I Boynton Beach BId peD 130 MP DU
I Total Impact
I
!
Source: Waller H. Keller Jr., Inc.
517
2,303
2,820
1\01
4,818
4,818
1.998 !
4.017
6.014
Exhibits A and B attached, show the individual rezonings would also increase
on roadways projected to be over capacity. The Knuth Road rezoning
impacts a,e less than 1 % in all locations except for Lawrence Road.
traffic
however,
If you have any questions please contact me at (305) 732-7844.
Sincerely,
Walter H. Keller Jr., PE, AlCP
President
WHK;us
Attachment
n r.CTIIVTID
.1......1.:. J"....
JUN 'l 1990
, i ~JI_?T.
PL^il:I,,10
.....
HI UUYUllJlIIH'.,. I" ,l~~ IH
_ ...!.t:'!.m: !lbaloE...!!~J.,]H
IIHI.,):W I', I AJ t:~',;'M
7'j'j 386L_____
l'age j uf j
Quality: Standard
kn ..+l; RJ, Pea
&hibit A. AaelYlllil of R..oaiaR E:oDODRon 2010 Volumet
I Addta'! I
Rev I
2010 2010 2010 I Pro'; 2010 2010 :
Roadway From To Cop ADT VIC I ADT ADT vIe I
i Boynton BeacnBd Knuth Rd Mall Rrl 46.400 35.5oU OJ7 I 1.068 36.568 0.79
! MaIlRrl COnllteS6 Avenue 46.400 35.:00 0.;; I 1.008 36.5U8 0.79 :
Conpteii Avenue Old Boynton Rd 46.400 42.400 0.91 I 385 42.785 OW
Old Bornton Rd 1.95 .1.1.800 56,BOO 1.021 329 57.l2~ 1.02 :
i ('o~ll:res8Aveoue NW22ndAve Old Boynton Rd 55,800 56.500 222 56,722 1.02
I.UI
Old Boynton RJ Boynton Beach Bd 5.1.800 56.500 101 253 56,753 102
Bo~nton BOll.b Blvd WoolbriRht Rd 46.400 50.70') l.l19 .149 51.U4~ 1.10
Woolbri/iht Rd GolfRd 46.400 56,700 1.22 2U3 56,9iJ~' 1.2)
I LawrenceRd NW 22nd Ave Old Boynton Rd D.100 15,100 1.15 159 15.259 1.ltJ
Old Boynton Rd Boyntoe BeachBd D.lOO 15.100 1.15 196 15.2% lP
i
sw nnd Ave Military Tr LnwrenceRd 50.000 13,900 (UA 80 13.980 n,+7
Sourc" Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc.
K.S. Ro~en. Coosultin~ Enwneer, Ine. ,
Exhibit B. 8t1y"'f.,.. 8t'dC t. f31vd _ /'Cf)
Analysis of RezoninR BllJlibln Blvd peD on Z010 Volu:nes
I
,
I Addlo'l Rev Rev
2010 2010 2010' Proi 2010 2010
Roadway From To Cap ADT vie I ADT ADT VIC
Boynton Beacb Bd Knuth Rd MallRd 46,400 35,500 0.77 2,147 3'7,047 0.81
Mall Rci ConweBB Avenue 46,400 35,500 0.77 2.027 37,527 0.8l
()on~.6Plvenue Old Boynton Rd "MOO 42,400 0.91 77~ 43.17:' U,I)J
Old Boynton Rd 1-95 55,.00 51;,800 1.02 662 57,Jn2 l.O2
I
I C)~~re"'s Avenue NW 22nd Ave Old Boynton Rd 55,SOO 56,500 1.01 446 56.9"6 l.02 .
Old Boynton Rd BoyntoeBeachBd 55.BOO 56,500 l.01 5l'9 57,009 1.02
Bo)nton Beach Blvd Woolbri/iht Rd 46,400 50,700 1.09 702 51.402 1.1l
Woolbri~ht Rd GolfRd 46,40(; 56,700 1.22 4U'l 57.109 ."
J....'
~ U:l\vl'enzeRd NW ZlndAve Qld Boynton Rd 13,100 15,100 wi 320 15.420 1.18 :
I Old Boynlcn Rd BOYDton BeachBd 13.100 15,lOO 1.15 i 394 15,494 US i
I I
NW22ndAve Military Tr Lawrence Rd 30,000 !:l,900 0.46 ; 160 14.0611 0.4;
I
,
Sourc.e: Walter H. Keller Jr., Ine.
K.S. Ro~en, Coosultln~ Enl!ineer, Inc.
City 01 BoyntOD Beach ComprehensiVe Plan c ~ '
r
.lUN I
r "
CITY 0 f
BOYNTON BEACH
@
OFFICE
100 E. Boynton B.ach Blvd.
P. O. Box 310
Boynton B.ach. Florida 33435.0310
14071734-8111
OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR
April 3, 1990
Palm Beach County Engineering Dept.
Attn: Mr. Charles Walker
PO Box 2429
West Palm Beach, Fl 33401
RE: Traffic Impact Analysis For Two Shopping Centers Proposed on
The South Side of Boynton Beach Boulevard West of Congress
Avenue
Dear Mr. Walker:
Enclosed you will find a copy of the traffic impact analysis and
master plan for the following annexation, land use element amend-
ment and rezoning requests to Planned Commercial Development
(PCD) :
1. Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD
2. Knuth Road PCD
These projects were submitted to the City on January 30, 1990 and
are being reviewed by the City's traffic consultant for consis-
tency with the Traffic Circulation Element of the City of Boynton
comprehensive Plan.
Please forward any comments that you may have by May 31, 1990 for
incorporation in the June public hearing proceedings.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BO~TO~ BEACH
t~~f- )'~,.,
JAMES . GOLDEN
Senior City Planner
JJG:frb
Ene
cc: Timothy Cannon
A:CWalker
Boa'" al' Count" Commluion...
Carol J. Elmquist. Chairman
Karen T. Marcu., Vice Chair
Carol A. Roberta
Ron Howard
Carole Phillip.
County AdrrUlllttrat...
J.n WI",e"
Deplutment of Engineering
.nd Public Work"
June 5. 1990
Jamas J. Golden
Senior City Planner
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Belch Blvd,
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33436-0310
REI TRAFFIC IMPACT AMALYSES FOR
BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD PCD AHD KNUTH ROAD PCD
Dear Hr. Golden:
As requested by your letter of April 3, l~~O, the Palm Beach county 1raffic
Division has reviewed the traffic reports for the two proposed shopping centers
entitled Boynton Beach Boulevard pce and Knuth Road PCD. The following comments
are submitted for your consideration:
1)
Based upon copies of correspondence fTOm your office to the applicant's
agent (Kilday & Associates. Inc.) dated February 13, 1990, we do lW.
consider the applications for these projects to have been complete prior
to February 1, 1990 and therefore vested against the new Countywide 1raffic
Performance Standards (County Ordinance 90-7) as per the Municipal
Implementation Ord1nance (County Ordinance 90-6). To comply with these
County Ordinances, new traffic reports need to be submitted by the
app11cant to your office as well as our office for review.
If the outparcels on each of the shopping center site plans will be
specifically limited to restaurant and financial institution use. their
trip generation should be separately calculated at the higher rates that
are representative of these land uses rather than included as part of the
general retail commercial area.
Z)
3)
Under Test #1 of the new Countywide lraffic Standard (which i~ comparable
to the previOUS unincorporated area ~tandard - County Ordinance 87-18),
significant project traffic would occur on two links of Boynton Beach
Boulevard that are projected to Qllceed their Qx;sting and committed
capacities. No improvements are recommended for either of these two links
(Military Trail to El Claire Ranch Road and Old Boynton Road to Interstate
95). Without some commitment from these developers to improve these two
lInks the traffic standard is violated.
RECEn'ED
JUN :> 1990
"An Equd Opportunity. Affirm.tive Action Employer"
BOX 2429 WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA 33402-~4~ (407) 68.~~oNNlNG Df.PT.
\
C ptlnrad on rw.-clH pap.,
-
James J. Golden
Palle 2
Junl 4, 151!lQ
Your transmittal of thsss traffIc repDrtE fDr our review iE apprecIated. Please
do not hesitate to contact me if you hllve any quect10ns concerning these
comments.
Sincerely,
COUN.TYTY -'EN INEER
~~
11an A, Enni., P.E" AICP
Development Review Engineer
AAE:sb
cc: Audrey Wolfe, SpecIal Projects CoordInator - County Engineering Dept.
File: General - TPS - Munlcipalit1es . Traffic study RevIews
Intersection: "Boynton Beach Blvd, & Knuth Road"
General - TPS . Municipa11t1es . Vesting DeterminatIons
aae\BB&KnPCD
" _ _ A" ~ . ~
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
@
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P. O. Box 310
Boynton B.ach, Florida 33435.0310
(4071734.8111
I
OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR
February 13, 1990
Kilday & Associates, Inc.
Attn: Kieran J. Kilday
1551 Forum Place, Bldg. 100A
West Palm Beach, ~L 33401
Dear Mr. Kilday:
. ,
Please be advised that the Planning Department has reviewed the
six applications submitted on January 31, 1990. Our comments are
as follows:
I. Proposed Service Station (.80 acres) at southwest corner of
North Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road owned by Bill
Ray Winchester and Elsie A. Winchester (applications for
annexation, land use element amendment and rezoning).
The following items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
(1) Since the proposed zoning category does not comply wtt~
the text language for Planning Area 7 of the Future
Land Use Element support Documents, an application for
a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment.
(2) An additional copy of the property owners' list, tax
maps (photocopy acceptable) and affidavit.
(3) The water/sewer impact statement reqUired pursuant to
items 6 and 7 on pages 4 and 5 is based on comparison
of existing and proposed zoning categories and not .
eXisting and proposed land use categories. The
statement also does not indicate that calculations are
based on the standards adopted by the Palm Beach
County Health Department.
TO: Kilday & Assoc
-2-
Feb. 13, 1990
II. Proposed Mall South Parcels (49.52 acres total) located on
the east and west sides of Winchester Park Boulevard
between Old Boynton Road and Boynton Beach Boulevard, owned
by Bill R. Winchester, Elsie A. Winchester, and Ernest
Klatt (applications for annexation, land use element
amendment and rezoning).
The following items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
(1) Since the proposed zoning category does not comply with
the text language for Planning Area 7.f of the Future
Land Use Element Support Documents, an application for
a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment.
( 2) An additional copy of the property owners' list, tax
maps (photocopy acceptable) and affidavit.
(3) Pursuant to item c(l) on page 3 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, written consent to the
processing of this application from Ernest Klatt.
. \
(4) Pursuant to item d(3) on page 4 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, a tree survey which
meets the requirements of the City of Boynton Beach
Tree Preservation Ordinance.
(5) Pursuant to item h on pages 4, 5, 6 and 7 of the Land
Use Element Amendment/Rezoning application, a compari-
son of the impacts that would be created by develop-
ment under the proposed zoning with the impacts that
would be created by development under the existing
zoning, which shall include:
(a) A comparison of the potential square footage or
number and type of dwelling units under the existing
zoning with that which would be allowed under th~
proposed zoning or development.
(b) A statement of the uses that would be allowed in
the proposed zoning or development, and any particular
uses that would be excluded.
(c) Proposed timing and phasing of the development.
(d) A comparison of traffic which would be generated
under the proposed zoning or development, with' the
traffic that would be generated under the current
zoning; also, an analysis of traffic movements at the
intersections of driveways that would serve the
property and surrounding roadways, and improvements' ,
TO: Kilday & Assoq.
-3-
Feb. 13, 1990
that would be necessary to accorrunodate such traffic
movements. For proposed developments which would
generate three-thousand (3,000) vehicle trips per day
or more, or two-hundred fifty (250) or more
single-directional vehicle trips within a one (1) hour
period, a traffic impact analysis shall be required.
Said traffic impact analysis shall include projected
trip generation for the development, for all major
roadways and intersections within one and one-half
(1.5) miles of the subject parcel, as well as traffic
that would utilize local streets through residential
zoning districts. said traffic impact analysis shall
compare traffic levels between the existing zoning and
the proposed zoning or development of the subject
parcel, and shall take into consideration all
development that would be possible under the current
zoning within the City, adjacent cities, and within the
unincorporated area of Palm Beach County within' a
radius of five (5) miles. For those parcels lying in
the unincorporated area of Palm Beach County, which are,
not currently zoned for urban land uses, the potential' ,
land uses according to the Palm Beach County
comprehensive plan shall be used. Where said parcels
are shown on the Palm Beach County comprehensive plan
under residential land use categories, the midpoint of
the density range shown on the County comprehensive
plan shall be used. Where a county-wide study of
traffic generation at build-out has been adopted or is
utilized by Palm Beach County, the levels of traffic
that are projected by said study shall in all cases be
used to project background traffic in the traffic
impact analysis submitted by the applicant. The format
and standards used in the traffic impact analysis shall
be the same as those which are required by Palm Beach
County, with the exception of the requirements lisl;ed
above. Such traffic impact analysis shall include
recorrunendations for the mitigation of traffic impacts,
consistent with the standards which have been adopted
by or are utilized by Palm Beach County.
(e) For parcels larger than one (1) acre, a comparison
of the water demand for development under the proposed
zoning or development with water demand under the
existing zoning. Water demand shall be estimated using
the standards adopted by the Palm Beach County Health
Department for estimating such demand, unless different
standards are justified by a registered engineer.
Corrunitment to the provision of improvements to the
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
-4-
Feb. 14, 1990
water system shall also be included, where existing
facilities would be inadequate to serve development
under the proposed zoning.
(f) For parcels larger than one (1) acre, a comparison
of sewage flows that would be generated under the
proposed zoning or development with that which would be
generated under the existing zoning. Sewage flows
shall be estimated using the standards adopted by the
Palm Beach County Health Department for estimating such
flows, unless different standards are justified by a
registered engineer. Commitment to the provision of
improvements to the sewage collection system shall also
be included, where the eXisting facilities would be
inadequate to serve development under the proposed
zoning.
(g) For parcels larger than one (1) acre, a comparison
of sewage flows that would be generated under the '
proposed zoning or development with that which would be
generat~d under the eXisting zoning. Sewage flows I \ \
shall be estimated using the standards adopted by the
Palm Beach County Health Department for estimating such
flows, unless different standards are justified by a
registered engineer. Commitment to the provision of
improvements to the sewage collection system shall also
be included, where the existing facilities would be
inadequate to serve development under the proposed
zoning.
(h) For proposed residential developments larger than
one (1) acre, a comparison of the projected population
under the proposed zoning or development with the
projected population under the existing zoning.
Population projections according to age groups for the
proposed development shall be required, where more tha~
fifty (50) dwellings, or 50 sleeping rooms in the case
of group housing, would be allowed under the proposed
zoning. Applications for rezoning to commercial or
industrial zoning districts which exceed one (1) acre
in area shall also provide projections for the number
of employees.
I ,
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
-5-
Feb. 14, 1990
III. Proposed Mall Corner Restaurant (1.34 acres) at the
southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and Winchester Park
Boulevard owned by Mall Corner, Inc. (applications for
annexation, land use element amendment and rezoning).
The following items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
(1) Since the proposed zoning category does not comply with
the text language for Planning Area 7.f of the Future
Land Use Element Documents, an application for a
Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment.
(2) A standard City of Boynton Beach application form for
the Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning application
(the reproduction submitted is not acceptable).
(3) An additional copy of the property owners' list, tax
maps (photocopy acceptable) and affidavit.
(4) Signature of applicant (owner) on page 6 of the
Annexation Application.
,
, .
(5) Pursuant to item hIll on page 4 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, the potential square
footage which would be allowed under the proposed
zoning.
(6) Pursuant to item h(8) on page 6 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, projections for the
number of employees.
IV, Proposed Retail/Oil Lube (2.44 acres) at the northeast
corner of West Boynton Beach Boulevard and Winchester Park
Boulevard owned by Winchester, Winchester, Zeiher and
Schroeder, al Florida General Partnership (applications for.
annexation, land use element amendment and rezoning).
The following items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
(1) Since a portion of the proposed zoning category does
not comply with the text language for Planning Area 7.f
of the Future Land Use Element support Documents, an
application for a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment.
(2) An additional copy of the property owners' list, tax
maps (photocopy acceptable) and affidavit.
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
-6-
Feb. 13, 1990
(3) Correct "Proposed Zoning" on page 3 of Annexation
application, as a County land use category has been
indicated instead of the proposed City zoning category.
(4) Pursuant to item hIll on page 4 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, the potential square
footage which would be allowed under the proposed
zoning.
(5) Pursuant to item h(8) on page 6 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, projections for the
number of employees.
v. Proposed Knuth Road Planned Commercial Development (13.871
acres) at the southwest corner of West Boynton Beach
Boulevard and Knuth Road owned by the Winchester Family
Partnership, Ltd. (applications for annexation, land use
element amendment and rezoning).
The following items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
,
, ,
(1) The correct fee for rezoning to PCD is $1,000 pursuant
to the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Fee
Schedule (a check in the amount of $900 was submitted).
(2)
( 3 )
(4 )
( 5 )
( 6 )
Since a portion of the proposed land use and zoning
categories does not comply with the text language for
Planning Area 7.j of the Future Land Use Element
Support Documents, an application for a Comprehensive
Plan Text Amendment.
An additional copy of the property owners' list, tax
maps (photocopy acceptable) and affidavit.
Signature of applicant is missing from page 6 of
Annexation Application (copy of owner's authorization
signed by Bill R. Winchester).
A tree survey which conforms to the requirements of the
City of Boynton Beach Tree Preservation Ordinance (see
section 7.5 - 6.l(b) of Article I of the Environmental
Regulations).
Pursuant to item hIll on page 4 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, the potential square
footage which would be allowed under the proposed
zoning (total for entire PCD).
I
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
-7-
Feb. 13, 1990
(7) Pursuant to item hIS) of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, projections for the
number of employees.
(8) Pursuant to item h(ll) on page 7 of the Land Use
Element Amendment/Rezoning application, conformance
with the requirements for Unified Control outlined in
Section 6.F.3 of Appendix A-Zoning and submittal of a
subdivision master plan pursuant to Article VIII,
Section 4 of Appendix C-Subdivisions, Platting.
VI. Proposed Boynton Beach Boulevard Planned Conmmercial
Development (14.76 acres) on the south side of West Boynton
Beach Boulevard owned by University of Florida Foundation,
Inc. (applications for annexation, land use element
amendment and rezoning).
The following items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
( 1)
The correct fee for rezoning to PCD is $1,000 pursuant,
to the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Fee
Schedule (a check in the amount of $900 was submitted).
\ ,
(2) Since the proposed land use and zoning category does
not comply with the text language for Planning Area 7.k
of the Future Land Use Element support Documents, an
application for a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment.
(3) An additional copy of the property owners' list, tax
maps (photocopy acceptable) and affidavit.
(4) A tree survey which conforms to the requirements of the
City of Boynton Beach Tree Preservation Ordinance (see
section 7.5 - 6.1 (b) of Article I of the Environmental
Regulations.
(5) Pursuant to item h(l) on page 4 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, the potential square
footage which would be allowed under the proposed
zoning (total for entire PCD).
(6) Pursuant to item h(8) on page 6 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, projections for the
number of employees.
(7) Pursuant to item h(ll) on page 7 of the Land Use
Element Amendment/Rezoning application, conformance
with the requirements for Unified Control outlined in
I
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
-8-
Feb. 13, 1990
Section 6.F.3 of Appendix A-Zoning and submittal of a
subdivision master plan pursuant to Article VIII,
Section 4 of Appendix C-Subdivisions, Platting.
(8) Signature of Owner/Trustee is missing from page 7 of
the Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning application.
Pursuant to Chapter 163.3187 F.S., none of the applications
submitted meet the criteria for small scale development
activities as a result of the text amendments that are necessary
and the fact that an amendment cannot involve the same property
more than once a year or the same owner's property within 200
feet of property granted a change within a period of 12 months.
It appears likely that several of these applications, either
separately or when considered together, may constitute a
Development of Regional Impact (DRI). Therefore, a description
of the petitions, a map showing same, and a tabulation of the
acreages will be forwarded to the City Commission. The
Commission will need to decide whether a binding letter should 'be
requested from DCA regarding DRI status.
.' .
If the City Commission approves the transmittal of these
applications to DCA, you will be required to submit to the
Planning Department, prior to transmittal, a description of the
availability of and demand on public facilities pursuant to
9J-ll.006(1)(b)4 of the Florida Administrative Code.
If you have any questions concerning the above, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNT~N ~~ACH
r!~'~
JAMES J. GOLDEN
Senior City Planner
JJG:frb
cc: City Manager
Central File
bcc: Alan ~nhi~, PBCty Trattic Dept
Kilday
I I
;'
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
@
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach. Florida 33435.0310
(407) 734.8111
OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR
7 June 1990 .
Mr. Alan Ennis
Palm Beach County
Engineering Department
P.O. Box 2429
Building S-ll70,PBIA
West Palm Beachr FL 33402
RE: Traffic Impact Analysis for Boynton Beach Blvd. PCD
and Knuth Road PCD
Dear Mr. Ennis:
Please be advised that the City staff found the applications for
the Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD and Knuth Road PCD to be complete
as of the submittal date of January 30, 1990. The City considers
any application which is sufficiently complete to allow process-
ing through the staff and various city boards to be a complete
application. In the case of both of the above-mentioned
applications, the items listed in the letter to the applicant,
dated February 13, 1990, were minor in nature. The only
missing item which could be possibly considered substantial in
nature were the requirements for a subdivision master plan,
however, since these sites will each be developed as a single
shopping center, the lack of subdivision plans did not constitute
a major ommission. All of the improvements which would be
required for a subdivision were shown on the conceptual site
plans for the PCD's, or would be constructed as a part of the
shopping center site.
Since the City considers the two applications to have been
complete as of the submission date, the City will continue to
process these applications, subject to the applicant demonstrating
that the roadway levels of service, as set forth in the City's
Comprehensive Plan, would be maintained, as well as applicable
levels of service in the unincorporated area. The provisions
of the City's Plan and Code Ordinances which were in effect at
the time these applications were submitted require that a
traffic impact analysis be submitted when property is rezoned,
using the methodology and standards utilized by Palm Beach CountYr
but subject to the levels of service set forth in the City's
Comprehensive Plan.
,.
TO:
Mr. Alan Ennis
Page Two
6/7/90
If you have any questions with regard to these applications,
please feel free to contact me. The City appreciates your review
and comments regarding the traffic studies which were submitted
for these two projects. The Planning Department will recommend
that the approval of these applications be conditioned upon
maintaining the adopted levels of service within the City, as
well as the adopted levels of service in the unincorporated
area.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
5?~~~
Timothy P. Cannon
Interim Planning Director
TPC/cmc
cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
James Cherof, City Attorney
Vincent Finizio, Engineering Dept.
EXHIBIT "E"
STAFF COMMENTS
KNUTH ROAD PCD
LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT/REZONING/TEXT AMENDMENT
BUILDING DEPARTMENT:
See attached memorandum
PLANNING DEPARTMENT:
See attached memorandum
CITY ATTORNEY:
See attached memorandum
,
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 90-158
(Revised)
May 31, 1990
THRU:
Timothy Cannon, Interim Planning Director
Don Jaeger, Building & Zoning DirectollL7~ _
Michael E. Haag, Zoning & Site DevelO~~dministrator
TO:
FROM;
RE:
MASTER PLAN - KNUTH ROAD peD (ANNEXATION)
upon review of the above mentioned project, the following
comments must be addressed in order to conform with Boynton Beach
City Codes:
1. Where proposed PCD is directly adjacent to a residential
zoned district show a 25' 0" wide green belt. All drawings
must be consistent in identifying the green belt area.
RECEIVED
JUN I 1990
PLANNI;~G DEPT.
meh:eaf
cc: Don Jaeger
KNUTHPCD.SDD
PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 90-174
TO:
Chairman & Members
planning & Zoning Board
THRU:
rc
Timothy P. Cannon
Interim Planning Director
FROM: James J. Golden
Senior City Planner
DATE: June 7, 1990
SUBJECT: Knuth Road PCD - Conditions of Zoning Approval
With respect to the above, please be advised of the following:
1. A master plan modification will be required if a drive-thru
restaurant is proposed at the outparcel site (Sections
6.F.5.a and 6.F.13 of Appendix A-Zoning).
2. Right-of-Way to be dedicated in accordance with the Palm
Beach County Right-of-Way Thoroughfare Protection Map and
Policy 2.6.3. of the Comprehensive Plan. Said right-of-way
dedication should include any right-of-way that is necessary
for expanded intersections.
3. Pursuant to the Traffic Impact Review prepared by Walter H.
Keller, Jr., Inc., dated May 29, 1990, the applicant's
analysis of impacted roadways is incomplete and should be
revised in accordance with the recommendations contained in
said Traffic Impact Review. The applicant's analysis should
also address the finding by the Palm Beach County
Engineering Department (see letter dated June 5, 1990) that
Boynton Beach Boulevard from Military Trail to El Clair
Ranch Road would be over capacity. With regard to the
County Engineer's comment that the link of Boynton Beach
Boulevard from Old Boynton Road to I-95 will be over
capacity, it should be noted that this link will be improved
by Palm Beach County, however, this link will still be
overcapacity according to the findings in Mr. Keller's
report.
4. Roadway improvements recommended by the developer's traffic
consultant and the City's traffic consultant, pursuant to
approval of the revised traffic impact analysis by the
City's traffic consultant, should be bonded prior to final
plat approval. The bonding of said roadway improvements
should be coordinated with the City's Engineering
Department.
5. The billboards that exist on the property should be removed
within 60 days of annexation, as they are not allowed under
the City's sign ordinance.
1
~ i. hJl",
, AMESl J. GOLDEN
JJG:cp
A:PM90-174
'"),
J~' J J..; . J 1...,1.... ~ H~, hi iL 1.::I:",,'j"I',,1::I4
Il.1..... I i'_,; _'0::,/:,:;-', 11-4':".::.._,
i~~l::,l r'U,;.
,
KBKODlmUH
FROM:
DATE:
Timothy P. Cannon, Interim Planninq Director and
Tambri J, Heyden, Assistant city Planner
Scott A. Elk, Assistant City Attorney ~
June 1, 1990
Determination of Unified Cont1='ol for Tara Oake PUD,
Boynton Beach Boulevard pcn and Knuth Road PCD
TO:
RE:
In response to your memorandum dated Kay 15, 1990 to, James A.
Cherof, city Attornl)y, upon lilY review of the above referenaed
Land Us.. lunendment and/or Rezoning Application.., I find that the
applications for the Boynton Beaoh Boulevard, PCD and the Knuth
Road POD oontain affirmative;> statement.. aqreeing to the Unified
Control provision.. of Seotion 6, Boyntoll Beaoh Code, whioh will
allow the City in the future to implement all requirements
provided tor under this Seotion. please note that in both
statements of Agreement to Unified Control, Paragraph c, there is
a typographioal error Which refers to .Sub Section 3A" and should
refer to "Sub Section. A".
A similar agreement to the Unified Control provisions ot Section
6, Boynton Beach Cod., should be obtained from the applicant tor
Tara Oake PUD, to insure that the city ot Boynton Beach may
implement all Unified Control Ret;IUlrelllents ot section 6, llnd
implement all necessary Asreements, Contracts, Deed Restrictions,
and Sureties, acceptable to the City When appropriate.
Please note that this Memorandum does not constitute an
examination by the city Attorney or all Agreements and evidence
ot Uniried control, nor a Certification by the City Attorney that
any such Agreements and Evidence of Unified Control meet the
requirements of the Zoning Regulations. When such Agreements,
Contracts, Deed Restrictions, and Sureties are dsemed appropriate
and required by the City, at that time I shall review the sams
and provide all comments and revisions, prior to my final
ExaDination and Ceritlfication.
If I lIIay be of any further assistance to you, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
SAEjkem
BOYNTON
MEM02
OCI James A. Cherot, City Attorney
IwCE,rlE"D
JUlt .1. lOOO
pU\NNING DE.PT.
~
-
, .
., . /
_.; J. '(I.;.~"':"",
,--.......~... .
/-/P.1o
, BOYNTON BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ANNEXATION APPLICATION FORM
NOTE:
This form must be filled out completely and accurately
and must accompany all applications submitted to the
planning Department. (2 copies of application required)
PROJECT NAME:
Knuth Road P~€.D..
AGENT'S NAME:
Kieran J Kilday/Kilday & Associates, Inc.
ADDRESS:
1551 Forum Place 100A
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
PHONE:
(407) 689-5522
OWNER'S NAME:
(or trustee's)
ADDRESS:
The Winchester Family Partnership,Ltd.,Bill R.Winchester,
_Ruby A. Winchester; Elsie A. Winchester,individually;
Bill R. Winchester; Elsie A. Winchester,as Trustee
General Partner:
9290 Nickels Blvd.
Boynton Beach,Fl. 33436
PHONE:
407-732-3961
PROJECT LOCATION: Soubhwest corner of Knuth Road and
(not legal description) Boynton Beach Blvd.
CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:*
(if different than
agent or owner)
* This is the address to which all agendas, letters and
other materials will be forwarded.
-1-
.
'.
"
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION
DATE APPLICATION FILED:
DATE OF TENTATIVE APPROVAL:
REJECTION:
DATE OF COMPLETION OF ANNEXATION REPORT:
DATE OF ORDINANCE PROPOSAL:
ORDINANCE>>
DATE OF ORDINANCE ADOPTION:
REJECTION:
DATE OF REFERENDUM IF REQUIRED:
RESULTS OF REFERENDUM:
FOR
AGAINST
DATE ANNEXATION BECOMES EFFECTIVE:
DO NOT WRITE ABOVE THIS LINE
FOR DEPARTMENTAL USE ONLY
GENERAL DATA
Ruby A. Winchester; Elsie A, Winchester,individ-
Name of Developer/Owner: ually; Bill R.Winchester;Elsie A.Winchester,as
Trustee The Winchester Family Partnership,
6 4 B6ill R.Winchester,G~~e~~l Partner
Area of subject Property: 0 ,220.7 Sq. Ft. or ~____Acres
13.87 acres
Estimated Present Population: -0-
AR-A~ricultural
Existing Zoning: Resi ential Density Allowed: 1du/5ac. d.u. 's
proposed Zoning: P.C.D. Density Allowed: n/a d.u. 's
EXISTING UTILITIES
Water:
City of Boynton Beach
Wa~tewater Collection:
City of Boynton Beach
Solid Waste (garbage):
City of Boynton Beach
.
-3-
STATEMENT OF USE
Existing Use:
Vacant
Proposed Use:
Planned Commercial Development
.-
JUSTIFICATION
Express in your own words why this annexation will be beneficial to
Boynton Beach, Florida:
See attached
EXACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE ANNEXED
See attached Exhibit "A"
.
-4-
'.
J
. 0
[liE 1J 11 (i'
Clly or Soynton. Seach
~!81J!1lng Department
.
"
.
.
.
\
I
,
I
Ruby A.Winchester;EIsieA.Winchester,individuall~
Name of Development/Owner Bill R.Winchester;ElsieA.Winchester,as Trustee
& The WInchester Family Partnership, L td,. Bill R.. Winchester, Gen. Partner
Locate the subj~ct property on this map anQ shade ~n the area. .
. " ~
.
-5-
OWNERS AUTHORIZATION
Under the prov~s~ons for Voluntary Annexation, Florida Statutes
require that a petition for annexation must bear the signatures
of all owners of property in an area to be annexed. The authority
authorizing a person other than the owner to sign such a petition must
be attached to and accompany such petition.
U/~JL,~L--h
'Signa ture of Owner ( s) o'E Record
~ t/ a/aA#;o....&-..
gnature . Applicant /-
Bill R.Winchester
Type Name of Owner(s)
Kieran J. Kilday/Kilday & Associates
Type Name of Applicant
9290 Nickels Blvd.
Street Address
1551 Forum Place Suite 100A
Street Address
Boynton Beach,Fl. 33436
City and State
West Palm Beach,Fl. 33401
407-689-5522
City and State
407-732-3961
Telephone Number
Telephone Number
-6-
'.
OWNERS AUTHORIZATION
Under the prov~s~ons for Voluntary Annexation, Florida Statutes
require that a petition for annexation must bear the signatures
of all owners of property in an area to be annexed. The authority
authorizing a person other than the owner to sign such a petition must
be attached to and accompany such petition.
X- ~Ld.ut1.aJ~
Signature of Owner(s) of Record
~C;ld/~ ~..
'gnature .f ~pplicant ~
Elsie A. Winchester
Type Name of Owner(s)
Kieran J. KIld~y/Kilday & Associates
Type Name of Applicant
9290 Nickels Blvd.
1551 Forum Place Suite 100A
Street Address
Street Address
Boynton Beach,Fl. 33436
City and State
West Palm Beach,FI. 33401
City and State
407-732-3961
407-689-5522
Telephone Number
Telephone Number
"
-6-
OWNERS AUTHORIZATION
Under the prov~s~ons for Voluntary Annexation, Florida Statutes
require that a petition for annexation must bear the signatures
of all owners of property in an area to be annexed. The authority
authorizing a person other than the owner to sign such a petition must
be attached to and accompany such petition.
)< CPA..;U# tI.J~..d.Mf:f ~
Signature of Owner(s of Record
~aM/4~.
. nature .f Applicant
Elsie A.Winchester,Trustee
Type Name of Owner(s)
Kieran J. KIlday/Kilday & Asso~iates
Type Name of APFlic~nt
9290 Nickels Blvd.
Street Address
1551 Forum Place Suite 100A
Street Address
Boynton Beach,FI. 33436
City and State
West Palm Beach,FI. 33401
City and State
407-732-3961
407-689-5522
Telephone Number
Telephone Number
-6-
OWNERS AUTHORIZATION
Under the prov~s~ons for Voluntary Annexation, Florida Statutes
require that a petition for annexation must bear the signatures
of all owners of property in an area to be annexed. The authority
authorizing a person other than the owner to sign such a petition must
be attached to and accompany such petition.
~ I 1) 7Z
cr AA /'n 7'J A.-l ..vt l) Itj).JIJ 1.1
Signa re of Owner(s) of Record
Ruby A.Winchester
Type Name of Owner(s)
Kieran J.Kilday/Kilday & Associates
Type Name of Applicant
8495 S. Haverhill Ext.
Street Address
1551 Forum Place Suite 100A
Street Address
Boynton Beach,Fl, 33437
City and State
West Palm Beach,Fl. 33401
City and State
407-732-4602
Telephone Number
407-689-5522
Telephone Number
.
-6-
OWNERS AUTHORIZATION
Under the provlslons for Voluntary Annexation, Florida Statutes
require that a petition for annexation must bear the signatures
of all owners of property in an area to be annexed. The authority
authorizing a person other than the owner to sign such a petition must
be attached to and accompany such petition.
;:/'1
A., J
Slgnature
'-..1/7
"-A." . /'1 i
~/..,i?~1 / 0/ /~y..
gnature AppYicant ;/
" . t
Bill R.Winchester,General Partner
The Winchester Family Partnership,Ltd
Type Name of owner(s)
Kieran J.KIlday/Kilday & Associates
Type Name of Applic~nt
9290 Nickels Blvd.
Street Address
1551 Forum Place Suite 100A
Street Address
Boynton Beach,Fl. 33436
City and state
West Palm Beach,Fl. 33401
city and State
407-732-3961
Telephone Number
407-689-5522
Telephone Number
.
-6-
.-....,,,..-.....
APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION
(1) (We) affirm and certify that (I) (We) understand and will
comply with the provisions and regulations of Boynton Beach, Florida
Zoning Code. (I) (We) further certify that the above statements or
diagrams made on any paper or plans submitted herewith are true ,to the
best'of (my) (our) knowledge and belief. Further (I) (We)
understand that this application, attachments, and fees become part of
the Official Records of Boynton Beach, Florida and are not returnable.
; '.
APPLICANT IS:
Owner
~c1 a/tU!bA-r.,
LSignatur0f Applicant . v .~.
Kieran J Kilday
Kilday & Associates, Inc.
Type Name of Applicant
optionee
Lessee
1551 Forum Place 100A
Street Address
xx
Agent
West Palm Beach,FL 33401
City and State
Contract
Purchaser
(407) 689-5522
Telephone Number
..
-7-
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF FLORIDA )
) 55
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH )
Before me, the undersigned authority persona~tY appeared
Bill R.Winchester
, who being by me first duly sworn,
on oath deposes and says:
1. That he is the fee simple owner of the following described
property, to-wit: (Give legal description)
See attached Exhibit "A"
(Attach if insufficient space)
2. That he desires annexation to Boynton Beach, Florida.
3. That he has appointed KieranJ.Kilday/Kilday & Associates
to act as agent in his behalf to accomplish the above.
z'#/~M~i~
. (Signature of OWner)
Affiant
Sworn to and subscribed before me
~L; iYUJ:\<.. ~/;d~
Notary Public, State of Florida at Large
r'!cf~;I'Y PIJ~)!;..:. SZ':J:l c.! ~r':ri13
r)~~' C;ra;:,;::;,;:,,;t ,. " :': ;-dl. 1:], T~?S
My cominission Expires: fi'"',;1,v!"llc,,l',ryi,,;r..ln'\J;Qncoln~
-8-
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF FLORIDA )
) SS
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH )
Before me, the undersigned authority persona~tY appeared
Elsie A.Winchester,individually h b' b f~ t d I"
I W 0 e~ng y me ~rs u y sworn,
on oath deposes and says:
1. That he is the fee simple owner of the following described
property, to-wit: (Give legal description)
See attached Exhibit "A"
..
(Attach if insufficient space)
2. That he desires annexation to Boynton Beach, Florida.
3. That he has appointed Kieran J. KIlday/Kilday & Associates
to act as agent in his behalf to accomplish the above.
,(' C#'A/~/a. hL~/..IM/;A-)
(Signature of Owner)
Affiant
Sworn to and subscribed before me
..:$~ -i'n (Jc,-,-,-!~.~.-r-
Notary Public, State of Florida at Large
. ~.:?t~~T ~,!~}rk;. 5!=t~ f]>f n~ridd
f: ,\' '~"."" .. ~ " ~ ,.. - 3
J.;, '-'..J'_""''''h. ,. ,';;-; c-':~. ~ , 19~3
My Commission Expires: il..;.r,.:;'~c.'j,r,ul."/i..in :1I;Wflll<;Qlnc.
-8-
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF FLORIDA )
) SS
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH )
Before me, the undersigned authority persona~~y appeared
Elsi~A Win~hp~tpr as Trustee
, who being by me first duly sworn,
on oath deposes and says:
1. That he is the fee simple owner of the following described
property, to-wit: (Give legal description)
See attached Exhibit "A"
(Attach if insufficient space)
2. That he desires annexation to Boynton Beach, Florida.
3. That he has appointed Kieran J.Kilday/Kilday & Associates
to act as agent in his behalf to accomplish the above.
)( ~~d IIL~./.Af;ff~ ~
(Signature of OWner)
Affiant
Sworn to and subscribed before me
~\'-&.~ 1l\;0( ~ ~ ,k ~~
Notary PUblic, State of Florida at Large
Ue~':!7V r-~1,r:.' ;~:'l~~ r,! ~';:-<'b
.~.~': r.'?rt:;~":r.:'.:d; ;:." ",C'"_J; r,,~ ;3 }tJ~1
My Cantrnission Expires: . ~~,"'I(;,!."'.:"::,',,.i:>.j,~-.h:,:,n~ll]r,,C.
-8-
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF FLORIDA )
) SS
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH )
Before me, the undersigned authority persona~tY appeared
Ruby A.Winchester
, who being by me first duly sworn,
on oath deposes and says:
1. That he is the fee simple owner of the following described
property, to-wit: (Give legal description)
See attached Exhibit "A"
.'
(Attach if insufficient space)
2. That he desires annexation to Boynton Beach, Florida.
3. That he has appointed Kieran J.KIlday/Kilday & Associates
to act as agent in his behalf to accomplish the above.
x/t~ CL~ tel ~4 0 ~-j; J'c.,
(Sig ture of Owner)
Affiant
Sworn to and subscribed before me
,
'S~L~'-fYl01-..Q.~~
Notary Public, State of Florida at Large
My Commission Expires:
UttG~' f'u :Jfic, ~!dl! 01 RcrhlD
Ilri {c.litr.~jlO::~;~ ~:~~"':!~$ f.::u.. ~ 3, i993
'" ' 'T' -: ~ r~;.. l"~...~,,..,,{.... _
-8-
- -
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF FLORIDA )
) 55
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH )
Before me, the undersigned authority personal~y appeared
Bill R,Winchester,General Partnyrwho being by me first duly sworn,
on oath deposes and says:
1, That he is the fee simple owner of the following described
property, to-wit: (Give legal description)
See attached Exhibit"A"
.'
(Attach if insufficient space)
2. That he desires annexation to Boynton Beach, Florida.
3. That he has appointed Kieran J.KIlday/Kilday & Associates
to act as agent in his behalf to accomplish the above.
~~ //
X A;:;ff/ I I
(Signature
Affiant
Sworn to and subscribed before me
~~-m\0~~'-'
Notary public, State of Florida at Large
My coromission
Nn1Ef"f ~:1 'ii~~', S:~1~ \:~~ r;~d!l!']
. M; t('<i:;':~~>..:.t;. r~~::;. '/":;, 1':i\}~
Exp~res : r.",,'!c~ :~"J T,"y; "in .IM\!tanCe Inc.
..
-8-
.K~'t frY Itb.1?J:;
EXHIBIT "A"-
lot'" ...._#.. ...~. __...
. . ~ 'i.
; Oc5CI2'IP'/lCN' , "',, ..... ,,,. " ..-
. . AU. tJ"e'rklAC'T:5' '3 A#'O. ItJ LYING .:5'tJt/,7k d/' ;{I,5'H/ 6'tJY#'/~)/ /?tJ4CJ (' ,rrt,T"c:
. RtJ,.10 A/.., &1&4) rtA/O .//?/!t'/5 &;7 .4A/0:Z~ r7ALA4' gc-rt<?/V /,/J/?"wS" .
at1N1/l/!.1/Y P.(r1/~. p;, /J (?t:I'.t'/?L7h-(/~ 7"j T//c- /lL/f./ T#e!?C"t:::V R,5'<?dRL?EO
1# ~LA/ .8tJtJ~ f? /1./ P/1Cc~ 72> t>'/ ?'"#E /,t/g,t./C RcC!~RL?f d/"
1?1t!'u 8.!"/1t:1'# C!tP?'A/m ,.ccC?A"/CM, .LE:5:S r#e' &".1157'" /5;tJ FEE/' 77/..;"..f":'.tJr:"
(
,
.
! ."
.......
...."y on~A
"--'--'--_.__..~-~ -._-
Kilday & AaaDeiatsa
Landscape Architectsl Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite l00A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(4071 689-5522 . Fax: (4071 689-2592
JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
FOR
KNUTH ROAD PCD
The petitioner is requesting Annexation of just less
than 14 acres of land into the City of Boynton Beach.
This parcel of property is currently zoned AR-Agricul-
ture Residential in Palm Beach County. The Palm Beach
County Comprehensive Plan designates the north one-half
of this property as CH-High Intensity Commercial and
the south half of the property CR-Commercial Recrea-
tion. This land use designation is due to the fact
that the property has an eXisting Special Exception
approval to allow for recreational facilities to occur
on the site including a tennis club and golf driving
range. This facility has never been constructed and
the site remains vacant.
In conjunction with the request for Annexation, the
petitioner is aSking for a change in land use designa-
tion in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Currently the
City of Boynton Beach has the northern portion of this
site designated as Local Retail Commercial. The
southern portion of this site is designated Moderate
Residential. The petitioner is requesting that the
entire site receive a designation of Local Retail
Commercial.
The petitioner believes that the proposed designation
of Local Retail Commercial will allow for an appropri-
atly designed Planned Commercial Development to be
established on this site. This site is located at the
southwest corner of Knuth Road and Boynton Beach
Boulevard. Two perimeters of this site abut Quail
Ridge Planned Unit Development in Palm Beach County.
The Quail Ridge Planned Unit Development is already
fenced and buffered from this site. Therefore, utili-
zation of this property for commercial purposes will
have no negative affect upon the adjacent residential
development. In addition, the golf course wraps the
perimeter of the PUD providing further separation be-
tween the nearest residential units and the site. The
site already has received a previous approval for a
commercial use in Palm Beach County. However, that
specific use of a tennis club and golf driving range
has not proven feasible for the property. The Planned
Knuth Road Statement
Page 2
Commercial Development District provides many safe-
guards that other straight commercial districts do not
contain. Because this site does exceed the minimum 3-
acre requirement, the petitioner has been able to make
the request for this district. The other surrounding
land uses in the area are generally commercial along
Boynton Beach Boulevard. Additionally, this property
fronts on Knuth Road. Knuth Road is scheduled to be
constructed from Golf Road north to the Boynton Mall.
The north area of Knuth Road has a new approved align-
ment which will allow Knuth Road to serve as direct
access to an entrance to the mall making this road more
significant than the average collector.
There is a limited amount of property left in this area
to provide for commercial services. The Boynton plan
has, in the past, recognized the intersection of Con-
gress Avenue and Boynton Beach Boulevard as a major
node for commercial services. This proposal is consis-
tent with that past history. Development of the site
in a commercial nature will add great additional reven-
ues for the tax base for the City of Boynton Beach.
EXHIBIT "A"
,u". ,~ I Jj ....
Oc!!5'CU'/;::'T/o/!/:-'. ." -<
,J!{t:L tJr'rRAC'7:.> 9 AA/O ;tJ /.y/A/C:; 5.()t/",r!/ tfr' A/EH/ g~JlA/7t:?Y RMO (5';rrJrc
R{)/JO AId, f:1t:?4) "'/I/O rRrJt'75 23/lA/Cl Ztf, PAt!.A4 8c/fC?// /,fR,W.5'
Ot?,#,.cJ/I,1/Y pt:""r /{/P. g; /I {!c"t:?RC/A/c:: ,T,:} 7rYE /'L.47 >>/c:'-R'E&'r'REet?RCeO
IJ/ .PUT .8'.().()/ 5' /'17,P"/1CI!' 73 tfr" r#c /'V-8,?/c Rec?,tJ/.!?p.5,:}/'
;::'/lL,u 8E/I d# c:!#U',1//~ r"t:&'R/c?A, LE55 THE' .ells?" /5;0 n.e/ rR'.ffceJr':
...''''- .
"
.,
R'" )-
i
. i
, ..
bB!'J!L!d2s-Bt:1s!'JRtls!'JLB!'J!2LQ!LBsIQ!'Jl!'J!2_BEE:bl!;;BnQ!'J
City of Boynton Beach, Florida
Planning and Zoning Board
This application must be filled out completely and accurately and
submitted, together with the materials listed in Section II below, in two (2)
copies to the Planning Department. Incomplete applications will not be
processed.
Please Print Legibly or Type all Information.
I. 2s!'JsB6b_l!'JEQBtl6IIQ!'J
1. Project Name:
Knuth Road p.e.D.
---------------------------------------------------
2. Type of Application (check one)
-------- a. Rezoning only
-------- b. Land Use Amendment only
XX c. Land Use Amendment and Rezoning
._-------
3. Date this Application is Accepted (to be filled aut by Planning
Department) :
--------------------------------------------------------
4. Applicant~s Name (person or business entity in whose name this-
application is made): Bill R.WinchesterjElsie A.Winchester,individually;
Elsie A.Winchester as Trustee; Ruby A.Winchester,
The W i -;:ch~~t~-;:.-F~.~;j.-iy-p~~:t.-;;~-;:.~hip~itd-:-BilTR-:Wirictiester_;Gen-.P art n e r
Address: . __Jj'.9iUlj..9_~]ll_Jl]..Yj--'________________________ _____________
--~~!~~~~-~:~:~~!!~-}}~]~-------------------------------
Telephol'le
Number: __3~!~!)}~)JJJ__________________________________________
5. Agent~s Name (p~rson~ ii any~ representing applicant):
Address:
~j~~3P_~~~_iJj~j!j]Q~~_~_}~~2..9j2J~~_____________________
1551 Forum Place Suite 100A
--------- ----------..--.------.-----------------------------
West Palm Beach,Fl. 33401
--------------------------------------------------------
Planning Department 1-86
page 1
Telephone
Number:
401l-689-5522
6. Property Owner's (or Trustee's) Name:
___~~~!_~~_~2_~.~3E~____________________________________
Address:
Telephone
Number:
7. Correspondence Address (if diffenmt than applicant or- agent):*
* This is the address to which all agendas, letters, and other
materials will be mailed.
8. What is the applicant's interest in the subject parcel?
(Owner, Buyer, Lessee, Builder, Developer, Contract Purchaser, etc.)
Owner
9. Street Address or Location of Subject Parcel:
Southwest corner
of Boynton Beach Blvd. & Knuth Road
10. Legal Description of Subject Parcel:
See attached Exhibit "A"
11. Area of Subject Parcel
(to the nearest hundredth (1/100) of an acre):
13.871 acres
Planning Depart~ent 1-86
page 2
- - ---_._._-'--,._.,_._--~----~---
"
12.
Current Zoning District:
Agricultural Residential
----------------------------------------
1""
~.
Proposed Zoning District:
__~~'::::::.~_.~~IE.IE.':.~~:!:.~~_I2.EO.~EO.!.<2.2.l!!.EO.IlL______
14. Current Land Use Category:
_~I:!.~~_L~_.'2.'lIlSLL____________..___________
15. Proposed l_and Use Catr.gory: ~_<2.l!!.l!!.EO.r.:.~:!:.~~_~'2.~~~J3..~t.'i:ll______________
16. Intended Use of Subject Par-eel: __~'__Q.'__l2..'____________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
17. Developer or Builder:
__~~~~J_~~li~'iP_t__________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------
18. Architect:
__ll!_'!.._______________________..__________________________
19. Landscape Architect:
KIlday & Associates
--------------------------------------------
21.
Civil Engineer:
____K_i.J....W_A....A ""0('; '" t "'3..______________________________
Rossi & Malavasi
20.
Site Planner:
-------------------------------------------------
22. Traffic Engineer: K.~_~~~~~~!~~~~!_~~~~n~~~_g}~~~~~____________..______
23. Surveyor:
.9.I~s .i-_lO_IL,..S_\.\.il51LlLll..!.Bri.e.n.,..I.n.c...--------------------------
II. ~eI~81Bb~_IQ_D~_5YD~lII~R_~!I~_BEEb!~eIIQ~
The following materials shall be submitted, in two (2) copies.
(check)
x
a.
This application form.
A ~opy of the last recorded warranty deed.
x
b.
x
c.
The following documents and letters of consent:
(1) If the property is under joint or several ownership: A written
consent to the application by all owners of record, and
(2) If the applicant is a contract purchaser: A copy of the
purchase contract and written consent of the owner and seller, and
.:...
(3) If the applicant is represented by an authorized agent: A copy
of the agenc~ agreement, or written consent of the applicant, an~
(4) If the applicant is a lessee: A copy of the lease agreement,
Planning Department 1-86
page 3
"
Kilday & Associatas
Landscape Architects/Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
14071 689.5522 . Fax: (407) 689-2592
REQUIREMENTS G. & H.
KNUTH ROAD PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
Requirements IgI and Ihl of the Land Use Amendment/Rezoning
Application require a justification and a comparison of
impacts he tween existing zonin~ and proposed zoning.
Currently, the Comprehensive Plan of Boynton Beach designates
the north 300 teet of the site as Local Retail Commercial
with the remainder of the site as Residential Moderate
Density. The Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan designates
the north one half of the property as CH (Commercial High)
and the south one haif of the property as CR (Commercial
Recreation). The petitioner is requesting the entire site be
designated as Commercial Local Retail under the Boynton Beach
Comprehensive Plan.
This request is reasonable in that currently both the County
and the City Comprehensive Plans recognize that a~ least some
of the property should develop commercially. Additionally,
the property 11a5 been in single ownership for many years and
the owner has never intended to divide the site for multiple
uses. Finally, a Local Retail Commercial designation for the
property permits the entire property to develop within the
Planned Commercial Development zoning category.
The comparisons required in I~equirement H. are as follows:
1. The current zoning IAR-Agricul tural Residential I in the
County allows for one dwelling unit per five acres which
would allow two homes to be built on the property.
Additionally, there is an approved Special Exception on
the site which would permit a recreation center
including a driving range and tennis club. This use is
Commercial in nature although permitted in the AR-
Agricultural Resi-dential Zoning District.
The current City Comprehensive Plan designates 4.11
acres of the site as Local Commercial Retail which could
easily accommodate a lot coverage of 20% or 36,764
square feet of retail space. Additi.onally, the balance
of the site permits Moderate Density Residential which
would al low the construction of 70 units.
I
, '
.
Requirements G. and H.
Proposed Knuth Road PCD
Page 2
2. "I"he proposed use is a Planned Commercial Development
with a mixture of retail uses and outparcels as
designated on the submitted site plan.
3. The owner anticipates development of the property to
commence upon finaL approval and permitting in the
normal restraints of time common to the process.
4. The potential square footage which would be allowed
under the proposed Planned Commercial Development zoning
is 120,000 squa~e feet (as shown on the submitted site
plan).
5.
EmpLoyment Projections: Item h(8) of
Amendment/Rezoning application requires a
the number of employment opportunities for
They are as follows:
the Land Use
projection of
the project.
Department Store
Bank
Restaurant
Reta i I Stores
35 employment opportunities
15 employment opportunities
20 employment opportunities
250 employment opportunities
Total
320 employment opportunities
K.S. ROGERS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC.
1495 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite F
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
(407) 964-7300
(FAX) 969-9717
January 31, 1990
Mr. Lindsey Walters
Kilday & Associates
1551 Forum Way
Building 100A
West Palm Beach, FL 33402
RE: Knuth Road PCD
Water Useage
Dear Lindsey:
At your request, this office has projected the water and sewer
demand for the above project. The Palm Beach County' Health
Department has developed water useage standards for different
land uSeS. For general retail uses which do not include restau-
rants, a flow rate of 0.1 gallons per day per square foot of
floor area has been established. As the exact useage of this
center has not been established, only estimates, based upon a
reasonable guess of the amount of restaurant use, can be made.
An average daily water useage of 32,840 gallons per day has been
calculated for this project based upon the following assumptions:
General Retail Space
Restaurant Space
(435 seats)
110,900 sq.ft. @ 0.1 gal/sq.ft.
9,100 sq.ft.
@50 gal/seat
This parcel of land is currently zoned agricultural in Palm Beach
County. As such, an average flow of 350 gallons per day per unit
at the existing zoning would generate an average of 1,050 gallons
per day.
The County's Comprehensive Plan shows commercial designation for
this site. Thus, there is no difference in expected flow rates
between this request and that which would be allowed according to
development regulations if developed according to the County's
Comprehensive Plan.
Mr. Lindsey Walters
January 31, 1990
Knuth Road PCD
Pilge Two
Typically, there is very little difference in water and sewer
flow rates for commercial uses unless irrigation is going to be
done from public water, At this time, the source of irrigation
water is planned to be from on-site wells.
Very truly yours,
~~~.
KSR/jr
(b) E::iz-,ting and prc'p05~c1 ':;p-i;de elev,ntj nn~.
(!:,~ E:ri sting o~- !~jl"'OpO~.f:.~r.:I lA1r.;\.ter bC)clj.('?~5..
Cd) Form of ownership and form of organiz~tion to maintain common
spaces 3nd recreational faciliti~=.
(e) A written commitment to the provision of all necessary
facilities for storm dr~inage, I~a'ter sL:pply~ 5~wage collection
and treatment~ solid waste disposal, h2zardous waste disposal,
fire protection, easements or rights--ot-wav, roadways, recreation
and park areas, school sites, and other public improvements or
dedications ~~ may be r~quired_
_X_(11) Far 1""(?ziJliings .to pl~.\nned zoning distt-ic:t<:;, the ~.pecific
requirements for submission of applications for rezoning to such
districts shall also be satisfied. Furthermc)r~~ ~11 materials required
for a subdivision master plan shall also be ~ubmitted.
!II.
eEELl~eIlQ~_E~~~~ Fees shall be paid at the time that the application
is submitted, according to the fees which ha~A been ~dopt~d by
ordinance or resolution. The Planning Department will inform the
applicant as to the fees which are required. All fee5 shall be paid by
check, payable to the City of Boynton Beach.
IV. Qs8IIEIG6IIQN
(I) (We) understand ttlat this appllcatiDn and all plan and papers
submitted herewith betome a part of the perman~nt records of the
Pl..;-.nn;.ng and Zoning Board. (1) (~Jo) tH?rob, certi-fy that the above
statements and any statements or showings in any papers or plars
C:;;Ltbmj.-tt~d heref,o.sith are 'l:r-ue to 'l:he bc.~~:d: o.f (mv) (oLlr) knowledge ~nd
belief. This application will not be acce~ted unless signed
Ix~;!i2~1:i t:~j:dl~ons bclo,". ___L:2L:LE_____
Si gna.ture of ownE'r.t~ TrU!3tf.,~t~, Date
or Authoriz~~ Principal. if property
is owned by'a corporation O~ other
business entity_
v. a~IDQBIZ8IIQ~_QE_8~~~I
~ ~/.u .
----___ __Q:..~~~5!~ L:_~,"~'
Signat '"e of Authoriz I"gent
/_.,;2)Y- 9~
---~------~~----
Date
(I) (We) h~reby de5ignatn the ~bove signed persor
::J, ragent '.Jit~:z:Ird to tl,i;?lPplication.
y Li:.f'1L_~~o.__"-~_LJ;?=JtQ:
Signature of Owner(s) ~ Truste~,
uS (my) (OLIt-) authorized
____1.:.,;]2-:24._____
Date
Planning D~p~rtm~nt 1-86
p.:\ge 7
"b) E;.:i ~ting and propo'5ed ':;p-ddQ elevt1'ti on::;~
(c) E::j ~t.in{,j O~.... pl....oposed l^'r."'\ter boclip-s.
(d) Form of ownership and form of organization to maintdin common
~pace5 and recreational facilitioc.
(e) A written commitment to the provision of all necessary
facilities for storm dr~inage, !~ater sL:pply~ sewage collection
and treatment, solid waste disposal, h~=ardous waste disposal,
fire protection~ easements or rights--of-w~v, roadways, recreation
~nd park ~reas, school sites, and other public improvements or
dedic2tions ~~ rnay bE reqlJired.
_1<__(11) Fot- r(~2oi"\ings .to pl;'.\nned zoning district,:';, thE? specific
~equirement5 for submission of applications for r~zoning to such
districts shall also be satisfied. F~Jrthermclre~ all materials required
fo~ a subdivision master plan shall also be s:ubmitted.
III. BEEblgBIIQ~_E~~~~ FemE Ehall be paid at the time that the application
is submitted, according to the fees which ha~'e been &dopted by
ordinance or resolution. The Planning Depar.tment will inform the
applicant as to the fees wt,ich are required. All fees shall be paid by
check~ payable to the City of Boynton Beach.
I"
v.
g~BIJ.EIgeIlQl':J
(I) (We) understand that this application and all plan and papers
submitted herewith become a part of the permanent records of the
F'1~lnning and Zoning Board. (I) (VJe) hereby certify ttlat the above
statements and any statements or showings in any papers or plans
submitt~d herewith are true to the bast o"f (my) (our) knowledge and
belief. This application will not be acce~ted unless signed
according to the instructions below.
x G~attJ~~
/ -------------------------------.-
Signature of Owner(s) or Trustee,
or Authori~e~ Principal if property
is owned by'a co~poration or other
bUEiness entity.
/- 75-0(/
_____-c____L~_____
Date
Q~I~QBI~eIIQ~_QE_e8s~I
_~ _~M~4#~e'a.;~.
19natur-I? Of"-t~thOri.2e~~;~t7 f'
/ -,;2 0, ~v'
--------~-~~----
Date
v.
(I) (tl!e) h~rE?l:Jy desi gnate the above si qned persor. .:\5 (my) (OLU-) alJthori z ed
~gcnt with regard to this applica'tion.
y ~f4~JL~_--------
Signatu~e of Owner(s) or Trustee,
/ -25'- 9(}
.------------tf'..J-----
Date
Planning Dep~rtment 1-86
p.':\ge 7
(b) E~.:i5ting and proposed gt-,!tde ele'vation:5.
(c) E:,:i!":it.ing OF' proposed l^'ater bDdic~s..
(d) Form of ownership and form of organization to maintain common
~paces and recreational {-aciliti~s..
(e) A written commitment to the provision of all necessary
facilities for storm dr2inage~ I~ater 5Llpply~ ~cwage collection
and treatment, solid w~ste disposal, hazardous waste disposal,
fire protection, easements or rights--of-wav, roadwaY5~ recreation
~nd park areas~ school $ites~ and other public improvements or
dedic~tions as may be reqlJired.
_){._(11) For. r!~zonings to planned zoning di.:;tr-ict,:;~ the s.pecific
~equirements for submission of applications for r~zDning to such
districts shall also be satisfied.. FtJrthermc)r~. ~11 material$ required
fo~ a subdivision master plan shall also be submitted.
III.
BEELl~BIlQ~_E~~~~ Fmes shall be paid at the time that the application
is submitted, according to th~ fees which ha~'e been ~dopted by
ordinance or resolution. The Planning Department will inform the
applicant as to the fees which are reqllired. All fees ~hall be paid by
check, payable to the City of Boynton Beach.
I"
v.
~sBI1.EI(;;aIE2tj
(I) (We) understand that this applIcation and all plan and papers
submitted herewith become a part of the permanent records of the
PI anni. ng and ZCln i ng Board. (!) (oJe) herebv carti fy that the above
statements and any statements or showings in any papers or plans
submitted herewith are true to the best of (my) (our) knowledge and
belief. This application will not be acce~ted unless signed
according to the instruction5 below.
/~ ch;/)..fLd~ ~
Signature of Owner(s) ~r Trustee,
or AuthorizB~ Principal if property
is owned by'a corporation or other
busi.ness entity.
/- '7S-9tJ
__L__~___~______
Date
v.
6UI~QBl~BIlQ~_QE_B~r:~I
_ ~ _ Q,-gA/7b.~~/F'~
~ignature of AuthoriZBd~t ,
__L"2J':.;.?.d-__._
OOt:;;
(I) (lIJe) hprl.~by de~;i gnate the above si qned persor.
agent with regard to this application.
X- _~ 4. /'(J ).iL~T;!A{'0L!/L
Signature of Owner(s) or rruste~,
Z\13 (my) (OLtt-) autt10rized
/ -,?? 5'- 9c/
.------------r.;..----
Date
Planning Department 1-86
p.:\ge 7
Ib) E:o<t',tl.ng and preoPQ5ec1 9'-,,,de elevation3.
(c) E;{:i.!"iitif1f;} !.Jl'- pJ....DpL"')SE~d ,^1i.\1:el'- bddic?s.
Cd) Form of ownership ~nd form of orqanization to m~intain common
spaces and recreational facilities.
(e) A written commitment to the provision of all necessary
facilities for storm drainage~ water sLlpply~ sewage collectiDn
~nd treatment~ solid waste disposal, h~zardous waste disposal,
fire protection, easements or rights-of-wav, roadwaY5, recreation
and park ~reas, school sites, and other public improvements or
dedic~tions as may be reqlJired.
__~_(11) For rl:~z()nings to pl-:1nned zoning distt-tc:t-:'i. thi? ~.pecific
requirements ~or submission of applications {or r~zDnif'g to such
districts shall also be satisfied. FtJrthermr\r~. ~ll materials requi~ed
for a subdivision master plan shall also be s.lJbmitted.
III.
eEEbIQeI!p~_E~i~~ Fee5 shall be paid at the time that the application
is submitted, according to th~ ,fees which ha~e been ~dopted by
ordinance or resolution. The Planninq Department will inform the
applicant as to the fees which are reqlJired. All fees shall be paid by
Ch8Ck~ payable to the City of Boynton Beach.
I"
Y.
!;;~BI.I.E:IG6I!Q!:J
(I) (We) understand 'that thin appllcation and all plan and papers
submitted herewith become a part of the permanent records of the
F'l<lnnin~J Olnd Zonin<:} Board. 0) (~Je) t,ereb,. cer"tify that the above
statements and any 5tatements or showings in any pap~r5 or plans
submi.ttcd here',vith are 'CrLlCi? to 'I:he bc~st o.f (my) (our) knowlE?dge and
belief. This application will not be acce~ted unless signed
:< ,~),"c:cordin~ to "I::'e ~7~'";2liO~5 !Jelm~. j-';'?~(J
/ .i: ---- ~L_~ld:\:.4.I.:L_ !t. --r----=-- ______
Signat' re of Owner(s) or Trustee~ Date
Dr Authorize~ Principal if property
it; ol.oJned by'a cor-pl"Jration or c.d:hf:':~I-
busi.ness l:?ntity..
v.
e~I~QBlleIlQ~_QE_e0g~I
'/'1 ~ .
_______ ___~~~~ __ _ B ~
SignatuI"_ of Authol"i.zed .,g~'
--/.:d-l-~-_.-
Date
(I) ell}e) hl?r(;?by desi gna't~ 1:he Clbove 5i gned pers'.:w
, ~gQnt with regard to this ~pplication.
U '~
y ~ig~;~~~~~~~*-;;;:"T;::~;t;;;;,
3~ (my) (our) authorized
----..l:d.2.:r2!____
Date
Pldnning Depurtment 1-86
page 7
<
.
(b) E}{).stlng and pr-c.paseQ ~ri~ide elevD:tion:=..
(c) E:.~:i.!:;~ting CH- pr"'oposed 1^'t3."t:el'" boclif?5~
Cd) Form o~ ownership and form of organiz~tiGn to maintain common
~pace5 and recreational facilitios.
(e) A written commitment to the provision of all necessary
facilitios for storm drainage, water supply~ sewage collection
and treatment, solid waete disposal, h0=ardou5 waste disposal,
fire protection, easements or rights-Df-w~v, roadways, recreation
and park ~reas, school ~ites, and other public i.nprovements or
dedications as may be required.
_A_(ll) For- r-~?::~onings -to planned zoning di'Z.tt-ict-:';~ thi? ~.peclTlc
requi~ement5 fer submission of applications for rezoning to such
districts shall also be satisfied. Furthermc'r~~ 311 materials required
for a subdivision master plan shall also be slJbmitted.
III.
6E:E:bII;;;BIIQt:LE~s!2... Fees shall be pclid ",t tho time toh',+: tl,e appl ication
is submitted, according to the fees which ha~R been adopted by
ordinance or resolution. The Planning Department will inform the
applicant as to the fees which are required. All fees shall be paid by
check, payable to the City of Boynton Beach.
IV. gsBIIEIg6IIQ~
(1) (We) understand that this application and all plan and papers
submitted herewith become a part of the permanent records of the
PI ,mnj. nCJ and Loni ng Board. (I) (oJe) hereby certi fy V,at the above
statements and any statem~nt5 or showings in any papers or plans
submitt{?d here~'JitI1 are tt-ue to thE? bc~st o'F <my) (oLlr) knDwlf~dgE' <:'1nd
belief. This application will not be acce~ted unless signed
/"ccordinq .~~~ instruction,; belm'.
/x _~d!L}~;;:~_',j=V- '<J--------- ___I.:2-L-/1.----_
Signature of Owner(s) or Trustee~ Date
or Authorize~ FYincipal if property
is owned by'a corporation or other
business I?ntity..
v. 6YI~QBI;eIIQ~_Qf:_e~s~I
~~~_Q~~/~c'QtO~.
~~-of Authori~~~;~'
/~2?~ 9&7
----------~!-----
Oat.,
(I) (tIJe) h~?rl?by desi gna'te the above si gned persor
l"ger'7ZZ'/Jd to this application.
y~jt~--~~-~G----------
Signature of Owner(s) or Trustee,
.:IS (my) (our) autt1ori::ed
/-2S-9t1
._----------~.!:.._--_.-
Date
Planning Department 1-86
p.:\ge /
The Winchester Family Partnership Ltd
P.O. Drawer 1220
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
January 23, 1990
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
As a General Partner of The Winchester Family
Partnership Limited, I, Ruby Ann Winchester hereby authorize
Bill R. Winchester to sign all annexation, land uSe amendment
and zoning application documents pertaining to the property
described on Exhibit "A" attached.
,~~/j~i ~(l/n. Zt1-~1.-~
Ru~nn WInchester
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH)
) ss
STATE OF FLORIDA )
On this 23rd day of January, 1990, before me, a Notary PUblic
in and for said county and state, personally appeared Ruby Ann
Winchester, personally known to me to be the person who executed
the above instrument, and acknowledged to me that she executed
the same for the purposes stated therein.
..
~~j.\. -rn.J0~"'--"-~\J.<iik
Notary Public, State of Florida
My commission expires:
I'~':.'ar". :fl"_1!1'r, S.t~1c 01 Floridu
I,~~~ 1,:,q~;:;L~:;,:n t:(r3;'\1; hob. ~ ~t 1993-
el;"..:~;i :.:"....1,<3'1 ~~,:, .lo"'''l;nc~ If\~.
The Winchester FamIly Partnership Ltd
P.O. Crawer 1~20
Boynton Beacn, FlorIda 33425
Jal':ua:.-".r 19 r l?'~IO
TO WHOM IT HAY CONCERN .
As a General Partner f The Win~~ester Family
Partnership LImited, I M. Frank Finfrock hereby authorize Bill
R. \o1incJ1est,c;r to sign all ailii"ex2.tion, l'nnd u:-:e amendment and
=oning ~ppli{:AtioIl d0CUt~~nts pert a ~ing ~o thF' propprty
descl-ibed on Exhibit ")1." attarh0(l..
7lJ?~/L 0~j/>-C' .Ai
~ Fr.~11~ ~11~~~0 ~
, . . - .. ,~ .... .... ~ ',1 '.
COUNTY OF CLARK )
) ss
STATE OF NEVADA )
On this 19th day of January, 1990, before me, Helen E. Jones,
a Notary Public in and for said county and state, personally
appeared M. Frank Finfrock, personally known to me to be the
person who executed the above instrument, and acknowledged
to me that he executed the same for the purposes stated
therein.
~r
Hele.n E. /J, eS
EXHIBIT "A"
~i 'I" ._~.. ..~
; .oE5ck'/;:1.17o #, .... .... . ... ....
. ACt. tJr- rRAC'7:5 9 AA/O. /tJ Ly/tl/c;: 5tJt//,t/ or- /,IE/{/ 8cJy,v/,tJ# RtJAO (5/'Arc-
~t7,1a A/d. g?>-1) rl/l/c7 rRAe/'5 :'Z;? /1//LJ Z.;f/ PA~M 8cAc?// r-r!R~.5
tJJtJ,<-f,L!/!,1/f/ /?,(/f/~, ~ /1 {?c!'tJR?l~c/t;:: 70 7#E ~Ld/' ;;</E"?Eb?/' REC.'oR?1C'O
/,(/ r"'LAT .6'tJtJ/ 5" dr "pACe( 7'3 t:f/' 7'#E PV-8,t./c REt:?tJR??f or-
r'AL.M 8E//dk c!tJCA//'t; /''(b'A''/CA, .l..E:55 T#E' E.t15T"" /:5;0 ,c;;E.r 77//.f"c~r:-
.,. .'
"
~~._-----~-
February 23, 1990
Mr. James J. Golden
Senior City Planner
City of Boynton Beach
PO Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33435-0310
Re: Knuth Road peD
Dear Mr. Golden,
As applicant, I(we) agree to the following items regarding
Unified Control for the subject Planned Commercial
Development:
a. Proceed with the proposed development according to
the provisions of the City of Boynton Beach zoning
regulations and conditions attached to the zoning of
the land to PCD:
b. Provide agreements, contracts, deed restrictions,
and sureties acceptable to the city for completion
of the development according to the plans approved
at the time of zoning to PCD and for continuing
operation and maintenance of such areas, functions,
and facilities as are not to be provided, operated,
or maintained at public expense; and
c. Bind their successors to title to any commitments
made under subsections 3a and b above. All agree-
ments and evidence of unified control shall be ex-
amined by the city attorney and no zoning of land
to the PCD classification shall be adopted without a
certification by the city attorney that such agree-
ments and evidence of unified control meet the re-
quirements of these zoning regulations.
ai'J(udJ;
Bill R. Winchester, -Benerti-partner
........,;...
""
" - ~.,.~.."
:: 18arranbJ Betd
ll-
lY!
~ lJ4IJI Jl1brn/urr. Mod. ,h;,
RUBY lINN WINCIlESTER,
RETURN TO: ./
Thil Il'lltntl'lMrit wen pr.por.d by, /
~. WIILI1IM A. ZElllER It
...... , v :r:&IIID... 8aIIIO!'!'D
~ _1.... ctr.::;~._
-~ ..-
roar . &.~ J1.OIJD.A......
1'.;' ~ (i-::~' '1JJ.!'~
(STATUTO I',' fOIJl-\[(!ION m.OT f.\.)
;1'P-
doV 01
December
,. 84. 1I,llllrrll
;.
00
individually
of Ih. Cov"ty of Palm Beach . ::"(11,. 01
TilE WINCHESTER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP,
Florida
LTD.
, orOI'lIO'.. 0,",
.8 who.. $10.' olliee oddrn. i. 9495 St:uth llaverhill Extcnsioo, Doyntcn Beach, FL 33435
... 01 the CovO'\ty 01
E
Wlbtr..,JI1. Thol t.Q;d o.onlo,. 10' 'Jnd in con"d.,Olion of Ihto IU", 01
.~ -----:------Ten and no/l00----------------------------------______
f!i
=1
Palm Beach
Florida
S'C'to 01
.0'0",....
DolIa".
and orh,., (JOod ond volvobl,. eonl;o.,olion\ 10 \Oid 0.on10' ;n hand pQid by \oid ~'o"''", t.... 'ece,pt wh.,.ol i, hefeby
od.M>wl.dO.-d. kOl o'on'.d. bo'ooinffl ond void to ,... loid O'onl",. oO'\d o,onl,..', II.;,. and ouion, 10'.""'. It.e lollowinv
d"e,ib,.d land. lilvol". 1.,.;1'\0 anti be'ftO .1\ Palm Beach Count>- ":Io,;do, to....it,
An undivided one-fourth (1/4) interest in all of Tracts 9
and 10, lyinq south of the new Boynton Road, together with
Tracts 23 ~nd 241 AS shown on Palm Beach Farms Company
Plat Number S, recorded in Plat P~ok 5, Page 73, of the
pUblic Reco~ds of Palm Beach County, Flo~ida~
/. ~
"d.&1)
~'1~
SUBJECT TO real estate taxes tor the year 1984 and all
subsequent years; %oning regulations and ordinances of
governmental authorities; C(Nenants, conditions, restric-
tions, limitations and eaBeR~nts of record.
_____...., T_ 1'01 , (-I r
. r...",I".,. N.
(..~'I"'"
orod lo.d 9,onI0' doe, ....'..by Iulr., '" ""(1'''' ...... ",c.. to '-O,,:~ !cond, oO'\d ...,Il def"nd Ih. \.O",e oooitu, r~ 1.._....1 (lo.",~ of 011
IM'\QI\\ ~hc::'::"Ot'V....
..',!.'
. oOG,o..'o. . ond "9'0"'''''' Of'r "'H'<1 10' ""'9uIJl' "). plu.ol. en COnlul '.Qui."I.
)n WUn". lI~rr'rtr. C.enlo. h,ol ...........nlo .e' Q'Qnlo,'1 hatOd tt..d It-oj .1o,.e dot o..d yeo' I.." obol..e ..".""...
Sto""'. W<l10!'d and delo_otd ... cu' p'e~' 1 I k.. ,. (..... .
~~ x.t~()..vt),.rjAM1C/u-...!.li.--L 'Soo"
'. '. - -. ... ~.~~~_~ Il!NCllESTER ,s..c,
-- fSeolI
,.....
sun: Of FLORIDA
COUNTY Of BROWAAD
I nUtBV CrqTlfY tfoo, tHO "'" ,J..,., b#lo'. _. _ oIr..c., dv1y ()VOI.I...d PO to\. oc\__IrdO_h. ~ oppcoa'ed
'RUBY' WN WINClIES't'EJt, individually
o
fOr
..
..
-
d~~.,be.d '" Q#Od -"'0 eu'<vPwod ,...... '-"'OO'''iI '~"U.......f 0.... od_~ bt-'Ofe ...: tf.of
10 _ 1.1\(1..... ~ be ...... ~'WI""
S", eu'c:u.rd.....,___
W)TNtSS.,..... ,.",rod DIId Cl"><od wool
"Il~ .
My ((...........\00.. e.OoO"
the C_,., (00'0(1 s..,.. /,0" .,fOO'rlOOd"", ;17 day 01 DecCDlbe..r
~~~.
~ "-<........ .
,EC~~!i VERJF!E'D '. .
PALM ~;':~~H COUNTy FLi::
;~~~ e. OUHKU: .
CLEfiX C;llClllT COURT
.'
.'
~. --.
01(:.... "j.~rr S'irt'" 'tMDoI
.... ,.,...::::.,~ ('.. t,. 11.!.
JIC!'Cf( }::, i!:.I(ut '/11. ... .
.. . ,ll'.,
~---_._------------
t
15
'.
..
.
,. I ~ "'b 3' 02
I " II -;) n .
7,..1 {". I..wy..... Ti'IJgz\ln~Uny Fund. rlnnd.. FJ"ridn
7 8
, 0 ('. 0 2 /,
~ ...J r
TlIis instrument W;,lS pn'parcd h~':
Nnmc G, Robert Fellows
ijfarranty Jeed
Add.,.,., 610 E. Atlantic Avenue
(STATUTORY FORM - SECTION 689.02 F.S.)
Dl"lr'ly-B.eacb FJoridA..-33444
tlIt,il1 311\~l'ntttrl',
LOUISE SUGGS,
Made this
1st
day of
June
1978 , tilrh\ll'rl1
a single woman, and JEAN G. HOPKINS, a single woman,
of the County of Palm Beach , State of Florida ,g\':\ntor', :\nd
to the following named persons as tenants in common: 26% interest to Ruby A.
Winchester; 250/0 interest to Elsie A. Winchester, individually; 250/0 interest to
Bill R, Winchester; 60/0 interest to Elsie A, Winchester, as Trustee under Trust (cont'd. on
whilSt' post office address is P. O. Drawer 1240, Boynton B each, Florida 33435 attached pAge)
of tht, County of
Palm Beach
, State of
Florida
. p:I'antpt.-,
lJIitttl'Bl1l'tll, That said grantor, fill' and in considemtion of tIlt' sum of Ten and 00/100 ($10.00) -----
___ _ ______ -- -__ _ __ __ --- -- -- - --- --- -- -- - --- -- -- - - -- -- -- - --- - - -- - -- - -- - - Dollars.
nnd ntht'r good and valuahle (.'onsiderations to said ~J"t'ntol" in hand paid hy said g:rant(.(" tlH' ,.(.(.'t.'ipt wlwn'or is 11l'1'(..I)\'
o.\cknowINlg;cd. has gralltL'd. hnJ'~ajncd and sold to the said gran tel', and g:rant(.'("'s ht.'if's :Inti assiglls fnn'\'l'I', tlll" fuf..
luwing dt'scrihcd J;:1ud. situntl". lying and being in Palm Beach County. Florid.t, tn..wit:
All that part of Lots 9 and 10 lying south of the right-of-way of New Boynton Road,
and Lots 23 and 24, all in Palm Beach Farms Company Plat liB, according to the
Plat thereof on file in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court in and for Palm
Beach County, Florida, in Plat Book 5, Page 73, all lying in Section 30, Township
45 South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida, LESS any right-of-way of
record.
SUBJECT to restrictions and easements of record, if any; taxes for the year 1978
and subsequent years, and to all valid 'zoniJ?g_ordinances.
~
" C>
~,
~o; '=::t .
: :'".~ at
. O;;:U
.n. C>
U> STATE OF FLORIDAI
DOCUMENTAR~;-:::;;"STAMP-TAX I
DEPT. Of REYENUE:.,~.~, '~,.~' , I
- ~. ". 1 ~ '
~ P.. ~ JUL'S'78 .1~~:~: 6 3 O. 0 0 I
= I05Z4. .~..,.", \ .1
'"
DOCUMENTARY'=
SUR TAX'= .
l:~~~J
'"
u =
\.,~
u,;.- r-
:::.-2: ~
~u
b:"\ ~
.., .
'.
"nd s"id grantor docs herehy fully warrant the title to s"id land, and will defend the s,une ag"illst the lawful claims
of all persons whomsoever.
. flGrnntor" and "grantee" arc used for singular Dr plural, as context requires.
31n IJIUnr1l11 llUlllrrl'of. Crall tor h"s hercunto set grail tor's halld alld seal the day '.\Ilel year hc'st "bovc written.
Si!,,,,ed, se"led "nd deliv~-~'r presence: l j) . f
-17/:!d:"u:l- a7hcuil",--, ~~"J~-~'.-' (St'al)
. Louise Suggs . ~.-
, ' .
(Sl"::!}
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~ C, ~(,;
_ :rei \.L::,Lj~ ,).,( . ... t ~ c::...
J n G. Hopkins
&6
(Sl'al)
(5(':11)
'" /""
..v.vvSTATE OF FLORIDA
~I ..<')COUNTY OF PALM BEACH
'~I,'N I HEREBY CEH.TIFY that on this day before me, :In oflk'el' duly llnalinl'<l to lake aeknuwledgments, Jll"'l<olHllly
lIJlpe:lred LOUISE SUGGS, a single woman, and JEAN G. HOPKINS, a single woman,
to me known to be the persons described in tlnd who cxccutNl HI(> foregoing: inst"llml;'nt :lnd :lcknowll'u~cd hl.forf."
me that the y exccutcd the sume.
WITNESS my h:lnd "nd offici", se,,1 in the County and State last a(OI'l'S:li~' thi, l~t d:lY of June
197.8 ' .\ ^ I'"''''''''
~ ~Q ..'~\':".'+'~'::~?;~:;/~.
My commission expires: March 29, 19B2 N~hl."J:PI~bhc:.:-- . :: ".
RctnrD Wi / :ff~f ..:.... .\~.~:.
'I'I1LU.wA.~~ }l:.".. .:,,: '.
";:"~E~ :fi 2 B B 7 rAGE 1 9 2 6 \t},t:::,;,:::..
"
"
-# sLt1 <P ~
,/
between Ruby A. Win"hester, Grantor, and Elsie A. Winchester, Trustee,
dated December 31, 1975 known as the Bill Ray Winchester, II, Trust No.
1; 6% interest to Elsie A. Winchester, as Trustee, under trust between
Ruby A. Winchester, Grantor, and Elsie A. Winchester, Trustee, dated
December 31, 1975 known as the Sheri Melodee Winchester TruJ'lt No.1;
6% interest to Elsie A. Winchester, Trustee, under trust between Ruby
A. Winchester, Grantor, and Elsie A. Winchester, Trustee, dated December
31, 1975 known as the Susan Patricia Winchester Trust No.1; 6% interest to
Elsie A. Winchester, Trustee under trust between Ruby A. Winchester,
Grantor, and Elsie A. Winchester, Trustee, dated December 31, 1975
known as the Kathryn Joy Winchester Trust No. 1.
\
8K 2 8 8 7 PAGE 1 9 2 7
ReC4rd Verifiel
Pai~ Beach CDII/J!y, ~
John B. Dunt"
.Clark Circuit c-
-.
GQtJ E: [:; s U;;t:l~ L ~:! f _C L-: (:1 0! ==1[; ~_I _6 t! \~;~~! Q tJ ~:~~ tJI_ ijE:E:~ I ~~ 61 IQ ~
Cl.ty af Boyntorl Be2ch~> Florida
Planning and Zoning Board
This application must be filled OLlt completely and accurately and
submitted in two (2) copies to the Planning Department. Incomplete
applications will not be processed.
Please Print Legibly or Type all Information.
I. ~s~sBeb_I~EQB~eIIQ~
1. Applic~nt's Name (person or bU~iine5s entity in I~hose name t~is
application is made):
Bill R. Winchester, Elsie A. Winchester, individually;
__~~'!c'=.~l2..:..._~~~'?_l1.~~t..~~_~~_!~l!.~t.~~L_~l!..qyA,-Ji.i.,Jl.<;:P-~.'Lt.!"..J:.,-___
Tue Wlnchester Family Partnership,Ltd., Bill R. Winchester,
Address: General Partner 9290 Nickels Boulevard .
---------------------------------------------------------
___..______.-______.._ ___ _..~<2Yn_t.C2..r1...J2..~"'_ ce..h_<_Xl._ll. Ufi.._..__________
Tell~phof10.0
!\~LlmIJl:21,... ':
(407) .732-3961
------------------------------------,----------------------
'"
~:.. ~
Ag2nt's NBm~ (per=of1, if 2n'~" r'epr9sent~nq ~pp~ic~.nt):
:~ (j d 1'-- fE ~:'~; ::
... ..J~~_~':':.r:.._..~:_ _ I5-~_~~.~)'.j_E:Lld..a.Y. _~A~.s_()_~j._"'_t.~~_________________
1551 Forum Place, BIdg.IOOA
----.-----------.-----.-.---------------------------------------
West Palm Beach, FI 33401
.------------------------.--------------------.-----------------
Tl::J. C:-i::)hD~-18
,'\lua:IJt::l'- ;
(407) 689-5522 .
--.-----.--.-...------------.----------..-----------------------------
"-' ~
Corre=oonderlCC Address (i.F jif'~01-~nt th~n.3p~1'c2n~ or agent':'~
.:,>- TI"';:L3 i:; t~'l..::. "..i:~(::'-C::'~;:~:; ':"o:J !,';:")ich "::.J ('.;:::~p~,:,r'd..~::., ~.:z..I-_':.;:::r--:'..:., ~'!:-Id 01::[ 8;-
cl..:;..i:c:r-i,:113 ('.J"L:~J. !"'-',\ J.':,:'~..l.CtcJ"
i (; ;<; j_ n ~!:; l:? ;::;: ;: :~!- ;~i; ~~ ; ~ ~~ !~} :;~ ~=~ ~2!2 !~:; u f: ~~ u n (~. I::~ ~~'
.the, t..?;~ t ,::.,.f. ';.:h~-",:~ C'':i:npr-c'i'~c:.:n':::ii ve:::
'. r': c! c, \'- ': ' (,.: r-: t:.: cl 1'-, ..~. j" :-::.' :.:'.' :..:. ~:: I'" ": _. I: i. en:; t h "',~ F:' ~ 2. n r.... i n q <::: n d
'J t.~-I~::- Ci -:_:v ::::,-:i::u'jni- ,j!-: :':':?~::;.ch~. ':~'l o)'--i. ::~a to ::\nend
P~~.n fJr .thm ~C~SDn3 ~.t~'::'~d bf~low:
F':Lz:.nninq [;?pt_.. J.'-Cb
i'j .:.t'::.\ (:~,
Attach additional stleets, if necessary.
1.. Sect i fJn, pag[::~ numb E:?t- ~I Elnc:l e~: i::t,-:t J. c\ngUi.:...qE' cont.a:i. nee! i n '~he COr.1pl.... i:?hensi ve
Plan which the applicant desires to be am~r,ded:
Exhibit "A"
__-See-~c1-____. ------ ----.--------.-----------........ ...---- ----... ...----------..-----
______~':...'!.EE.~i~_"'':':!:.}.:!_:'::-':g~~s!:.:!:~g a _~ext amendment to VIII. LAND USE PROBLEMS AND
- .-- ----------------------------------------
_..__.9~~~R].Q~!..TJ~~'__..?~i..:._~_a.!~.':!:._at .~outh~est Corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard and
-- --- -------------------------------------
15~.',,- t:..h..~"'_'!..d_' _ ~ '0 ~e.:' _~ 2::..9.!: _ ~~! .?_~ ~ <;':'3-' _ _~':!-_: ~:i: c:.n_.CJ.! _-'~ :.:':' _ ':'.':..! .!'.: _ ':..0": .:~:. :..n_.: ~ ~!! .:.:_
of this property, in accordance with the adopted Boynton Beach Boulevard plan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
__.._.:r:!:':~.!.!:'E'~:!:.~~2:_'2!'_.!E':.YE<;'.E':.JC.tl'_.".~~.!:~ b<:... placed in the Moderate Density
-- ---------------------------------
Residential land use category."
-----------------.--------------------------------
--~-----_._----------------------_.-------------------------------------
---------------------------.---------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
'""
~.
Natu~e of amendment r2qGssted:
__oS S!S!_ httg>:;bS!.Q_ -E><.hi h:U:.. _c'.A~_ -- - -- ---
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------.-----------------------.----.-------..
- .___ _.. __._ - - - ._. _. '_"_ _._ __ n. ._. ._.... _.. _._ __ .__ _ __. ._....._ -_..._ ..- .-. _... -.- --.--..
-----.-.------..-----------------------
------------------.------.----------..-.-.-.-----...------------------------------
..~ ._. - - ... - n_ __ .._.._ .... .... ..... .._... .... ..... ... _ _. _.. _. _. _... ..... .... n..' n.. .... _ ..... __. .... -... ..-. .... ....
...:'~ PI..Cp'21.....!.:::.I.-.~: "":,:.- ~:"ic~'r--:::on3 t:-l<~.\t ;,^!f'll'.!.CJ I:::.:':~ ~.\..:.!.,:.:,:..::t~.?j tl'/ r.:i"'CpC~;;,?;j :\,iiCr:C!c:-:c:n'c:
_.... _ ..S."",... ;!t.~"<oh".cl. OfE QP_e.r_ty ._.~pp.E" :b.s."r. '.s. ..J:!."P.." l1.d . <og"espol1<!. ing. ?,.opeE .1:X.~E'~':. _L~_~~. ~.n.n...
--.--------.----.----.----.--.----.-.--.-.-------
;:'l':;1nninq D'~::'p"i:. 1-.-8b
iJ .;,;I.il
EXHIBIT "A"
Requested "ext Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan:
VIII. LAND USE PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES
7. j. E~-!,se I a t_ Sout_h~~:?_~ ~_9rner of fJoynton. Beach Sou i evard
i3~nd !<;nu..th B_oad
This is a 14-acre parcel which is cu~rently approved in the
unincorporated County as a golf and tennis facility. If
developed as such, a Recreational land use and zoning
designation would be appropriate. It is likely, however that
the property will be developed for more intensive uses.
Regardless of how the property is developed, should be
required to submit an application for annexation. The City
should permit Local Retai 1 Commercial CH+-.t.-h-e--R-Q..~~+l--2.2S__
~4~~-~--~A4~-p~~~~~,--~R-~Q~~n~~~~~_the_<uiap~_____
Qe~-n-t.eR-~B-A-..f...",-l.........,."4--f'-..a....---:r.i""-l'-..........i..nd""'--Ot-~_.p.r..a.pe.r..t...)t.
sAeu-I4--be--p.j,-a,.g.e...-4-n-- t.1>e-../4><l............t.Q_ -I4>.nlO.:i..t..;<. -g-<iJ.S.i.d..~J..a.l_.l..a.nd_.u..s.e_
Ra-l~"?,. Building heights on this property should be
limited, however, to 2 stories (25 feet), since 1- and 2-
story residences lie in close proximity to the south and
southeast.
Pages 90 and 91
7.h. Residential Area between Old Bovnton Road and L.W.D.D. L-24
Canal west of Knuth Road
This area contains the Oakwood Lakes project, as well as a
portion of the Country Club Trails PUD. Densities for approved
projects range from 5 to 10 dwelling units per acre. This area
has good acceSs and is largely surrounded by commercial or high
density residential developments. Therefore, this is an
appropriate location for High Density Residential land use. The
City should oppose any establishment of commercial uses within
this area, however, since commercial uses would intrude into
residential areas, access is not sufficient for commercial
development, and adequate commercially-designated property
already exists in the vicinity. BUilding heights should be
limited to 2 stories, in order to be compatible with with the
surrounding 1- and 2-story residences. The undeveloped parcels
abutting Old Boynton Road and Knuth Road should be annexed if and
when they become adjacent to the City. The oakwood Lakes project
and the parcel to the west should ultimately be annexed by
referendum or other legal means. Any annexation in this area
should include annexation of the adjacent rights-of-way for Old
Boynton Road and Lawrence Road.
7.i. P~rcels on North Side of Bovnton Beach Boulevard, West of
Knuth Road
This area consists of a 160-foot deep strip of land lying between
Boynton Beach Boulevard and the L-24 Canal. The Palm Beach
County Comprehensive Plan shows only part of this strlp to be
suitable for commercial development; however, it is likely that
the remainder of the parcels in this area will eventually be
permitted to develop for commercial uses. If annexed, the zoning
categories imposed by the City for these parcels should generally
correspond to the pattern of County zoning, meaning that retail
commercial uses should not be permitted further than 660 feet
west of Knuth Road. Properties lying to the west of this point
should be limited to office uses. The City should annex the
properties designated for Office Commercial only if it can be
reasonably expected that Oakwood Lakes development north of the
L-24 canal will also be annexed. Furthermore, if any of the
properties fronting on Boynton Beach Boulevard are annexed, the
right-of-way for Boynton Beach Boulevard should also be annexed.
7.j. Parcel at Southwest Corner of Bovnton Beach Boulevard and
.
Knuth Road
This is a I4-acre parcel which is currently approved in the
unincorporated County as a golf and tennis facility. If
developed as such, a Recreational land use and zoning designation
would be appropriate. It is likely, however, that the property
will be developed for more intensive uses. Regardless of how the
property lS develeloped, the owner or developer should be
90
required to submit an application for annexation. The City
should permit Local Retail Commercial on the northern 225 of thlS
property, in accordacce wltll the adopted Boynton Eea:h Boulevard
plan. The remainder of the property should be placed ln the
Moderate Density Residentlal land use category. Building heights
on this property should be limited, however. to 2 stories 125
feet), since 1- ~nd 2-scory residences lie in clc3e proximity ~o
the south and southeast.
7.k. Unincorporated Parcels on south Side of Bovnton Beach Elvd.
,~
,
,
These parcels constitute an uniccrporated pocket which should be
annexed. The first row of lots lYlng co the west of the present
c~ty limlts, having an east-west dimensicn of approximately 300
~eet should be placed in the General Commercial land use category
and C-4 zoning district. These parcels should be required to
dedicate right-of-way and construct the adjacent street
conslEtent with the requirements that were placed on the u.s.
Fost off~ce. The c8m~ercia: ?arcels should bs ~eve18ped so as to
be COflpatible with the future residential ~se of the property
WhlCh lies to the west. Those parcels which lie further west
should be placed in the High Density Residential land use
category. Commercial development on this parcel should nct be
~er~l~~ed since a s~ngle-famlly subdivision lies immediately to
the west &lld acleq11are commercial property ~xists elsewhere in the
vicinity. Furthermore, building heights on this parcel should be
limited to ~ stores (25 feet) within 150 feet and 3 stories
w~thin 400 feet of these single-family lots.
PLANNING .i"REA 8--S0UTHWE.3T QUADRANT OF CITY
8.a. Lake Bovnton Estates (language which was included in the
draft plan and su~part documents which 11ere transmitted to the
City Commission on october 17, 1989)
~fl~~-=9-e-~~aEEeB-3Bt-~ar~e~Y-BR~ffi~FeVea-9BBa~V~8~eR7-wR~eR The
nnrthe~n portion of this subdivision 1S zoned primarily for
single-family ase, but includes mUltiple-family zoning along the
eastern bounda~y, and Neighborhood commercial zoning at the
nor~hern and sot~ther~ en~s. The southern por~ion of Lake Boynton
Estat3~ and several unplatted tracts lie within a Planned Unit
Develonm':?nt. (?LTDl and Fl3.nn.~d Commercial Develo-omenL: (?CD', v7hich
ar,o, c;'1e .outject c)"' court-ordered settlement stipulacicns. ape
eHFF~R~~~-~~~-~H0~~e~-e~-a-~awsH~~ concerning t~1e 1~11d tlS~ ~nd
zcnlng for the area. On tIle 110rthern portion of Lake BQynton
Estates t.he property I i-;rh-i.ch i$ not within the PUD or PeD-the
sH~,eeE-ef-t~e-~aw8BiE7 the land use for the R-1A zoned ?ortion
s]lould be changed from Moderate Density Residential to Low
Density Residen~ial, to reflect the existing zoning and pattern
o~ d'?velopment, ~nd "the ~3rrd use for the R-3 =oned portion ShOllld
be changed from High Density Residential to Medium Density
Itesidential and P-2 zoni~g, ag3inr to reflect the existing
pactern of development. The parcel occupied by the American
~egicn
91
__________________~__.________'_________________.___._._------------______0--------
--------------------------.----------------.----------------------------
n Statement of conditions, hal~dship5, or ott'e~ ~2aS!JnS .justifying the
proposed amendment:
----------------------.---------------------------
See Attached Justification Statement
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------.-------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------'-------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------._------------------
--------------------------------------------.--------------------------
-----------------------------.---'--.-----.----------.--------.-------------------
"
---------------------------.---------------.-----.---.--------------------
. .
--------------.---------------------------------------..------.-------.--------------
------------------.-.-------,--------.----."------------..--------.---------.---------
-- ..- -- .--..- .... ..-. .-- ...- .-.- ..-. .... - . .....- .-- ..- -.- --. --. -..---- .-- .--..- -.- _H' "._ _H' .__ __ .__ _._ __ _..._ - .'_' ____
_____._._.._.___ __..._..___. _.. _ ........... _ _..... .___..__..._ __~....._~.._.._ ..._.__ _.., _. ....._ .__ _........___._ _ ........ _._. ___.__._ _. __._~. ...._..____ .__H_____...___._.._.____
-------------.-------..---------.--------------.---------,-.----------------------.------
--------.------.-.-----.--,--------------..---..----.-----------.-.----..----------------------
must
:.;ut:)f'n~. t
~: 1"': '2 -F ':J 1 1 '::. I:.j i. !l q
-n :'.\ t_ ,~.~, ~ -j, .::.\ -
"i.r'l
~ll ~~DpOS2d Comprehensive Plan
I..\~~i~?' ~.::,f P1"-CJpc'r-t.';-'" the D.pplic:cint.
(:,?) cop.:' ::-::: ':
III~ b~~I_9E_QEE~G~~D_CBPE~BI~_~~~ERS. F~~
amendment~~ :~t,ic~ ~10~J~.d chan~8 ~he ~crmitted
';""1
~JrQP8rtie~ ~Jo!Jlc! I~G
,"-01 ~:::. ,n .1:1...,,.,_: '~_~(JI \I-it:'.
"::'r~:ol'''C:!! :'c!
f....
!-I-:,;:,.
", ~.. "'.
'!. f: ':,~ --.;.~:::1 r- (':"~: ;~;,E''T:;;; ~\n d 1 eq Ell
....:..r~lj, tt;:,::,d I..l'~:;E'S <:J.f '~~2\i J
:it~~~ offi=ial tax
:\ ':~ r.'" ':'.~':-::.? ;:'\;:'FI.L LC2nt.,
:~)'':: . '''C'./:i.l::!;~~d" C;a::. c! }_ i <.:~t
:1':\1:: t.::; "!'IF h ',,'~"._ (];: .t.:-'IC_'
(..) C'::: m ~:) I "_~' -t. '0
1. :~ ::it
c,i:
..,
d..'.
pI' C;:l2i,-.I:.!
. !'- ":':]::; \_:':'1'- 1_: j_ ~:.~:;
" ~..~ ";:'. n"'~ r", ;:!" Z:"r, t.
c:: t...J r-j (-2': t- ~~: ~J
.: 1 ,_\ .1. ~.
r:j":~'~;:;;::i'-'i, pt i C; i':;i
;.._....
.,. ..Ii"
-'.] 1
; C;!'-
1::/"'1 :i. 1.1:
::)1.1'-""
!...:"t.:....
"1'-'1;:::11
. ,".'
" . r - ~..: "
;1,cdJ.
~:::h,~.\ll
nq
, .::', ~J ::::' 1 ...,
/'c,!'-'
!.~ (.::. ~:~, r.H,
~ d d i-- 1 -'::~ ~:; E:":~i
liilJ
..j"
.:\.1.':[:
,.....",
'::'. c c C~.":"I P . ;\ 1'''1 :i. E' ':.~
1"1
;::, r:
j "',\/-i I'
....,.l:.
;-c
,,:t::J p 1 .j. ::: ,.\n t :' ,.:: \: ,"'C .j i. c_'d'" ..,-~-
,::: H', i d 1.
:;1"
...' 1 :',.) ,.~- +. i::' ", I''', '.! ':".: t- '.l .-':... t. ~::~ "
!'i'-'H: :i."f. :i.l'-:::;"i::.~. C)'
'.J ..:- :,1 ,I: -F ":'.::: t. [.~ ':: ...: :-"':':~::' -:\'"
....'t:.In.-.::;r..'.:: ,'J
'.) ._'~ i':! c: r'; ,:! b .... .t.:. 1"1 ',:~ '.::::t t y c,-I:
F'('JV"":' en F- ._. "0'.'" :-1 "
PI ;.:::cP',. ._.r t:"-I:~~ r:'.;;,lITl E:....;:.:'c'.-I '.J:..in-:~.'-/ Pl'''np(':'I,..T; "~I~~)[:\'- .'. .:;>....'1
;.:0 + ~- ~-: L: ::::"" ::.l~', ;:; 1'-' -\: it: ,:, 1'- '~, .1.: '~.:' !,. ,r' r..' r:! .t- :::. c,. p.... ,'- : n 1''" -, I.' : '_'. b c '-.' ~:'.
iil';1p:;. ,:~h'::'~~Ji(li~ :.?\J.1
:::'J 0lin:L !"'(.J D::':D'I: ~ 1...:]6
''', C] ,...~,
Kilday & A880Ciates
Landscape Architects/Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
14071 689.5522 . Fax: 14071 689-2592
JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT FOR
KNUTH ROAD PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
CUMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT
The petitioner is requesting a Comprehensive Plan text
amendment to allow this entire site to be developed as Local
Retail Commercial. This text amendment request is consistent
with the current Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan
designation which shows the property as a combination of
Commercial and Commercial Recreation. The Boynton Plan
already recognizes that the Commercial designation is
appropriate along Boynton Beach Boulevard.
However, the Boynton Plan does not recognize the depth being
requested by the petitioner. As marketing changes, the needs
for additional depth has been demonstrated in many projects
which have been designed and constructed along Boynton Beach
Boulevard. The proposed development plan allows for a
unified development of the entire parcel. Development of the
property based on the limited depth creates an additional
problem in trying to squeeze a very small residential
development in the area between the Quail Ridge buffer and
the designated Commercial area along the north. The proposed
plan allows for the entire site - which is a singie parceJ-
to develop under a single Comprehensive Plan Land Use
category.
IV~ BEEb!~BIIQ~_E~~~~ Fees shall be paid at the t~me tha't the application
is 5Ltbmittod~ according 1:0 t~18 fol~awing sc~edule. All f(~e~ shall be paid by
check, payable to the City of Boynton Beach.
For amendments to thE~ tf~~:t o-F tht~
comprGhensive plan for the benefit
of a pat""ticLllnr prop9t""tv 01- properties.
.:~~;:;f=\O u 00
Where postponslner,t of action by .the P12nning and Zoning board or City
Council is r9quested bv tt18 applic~nt, ~{ter the application has been
advertised, the follDwing fee~ shall b~ paid:
For re-advertisement of the application,
where re-advertisem~nt is rGquil~ed
':';1.25. ')(l
For each additional. transmlssion of
the application to the Planning 3nd Zonin9
BOEd'''d Ot- Cit:.'l Council:. ~'';\.ft~l'M 'l:h'::? i,.iti::}l
transmi s:::ii. Dri.
:2'3.00
v. C~BIIEIGQIIgN
(I) ('.!Je) undc:?I.....3t0.n'_-J tl.~;<:lt t!-'i :~. ::; :::\pP 1 j. c:::\t:i an 2'.nd <:(1 I. p.i. ari .::l;iC! p 3pE'rs
'..':iut:)m:i, t"tcd h::':.';,"r2".l~. t!.: b~'::;cCJm(.;; ,~i. pE(i-.-!'. D'::: tilE' r: 21""m::,n{:?n'~: ,1"":::'~C;'!"'d~3 t)f thE' i='2 .::\nni nq
i:1nrj ZOliilll,) E~c)<"]Ij'~d" (I) (L!-I[~) ht~I'~l,,_'t:,\, C~~\l-ti-f./ thi:;tt ,(:h~-:: .::.i.bD'/':~ statern;::;.nts and
any st~t2ments C)~ 3h~'~:ings ~n ~.n'! p3p2~:: (~Y. !JI2~s ~tl.Jmitt2d herewith are
"l::-u(:. to t:.., \,,2 b':,~;"it u-~~ (rr:y) i Dur- \ ;-:("JVJ.l t:,:-':!;Jc, ,;;',1-:8 !:: .:'~':. l l:.."r." T:":i ';:.;. :::o.pp:L i. cati on
~J.G."~C acc~h.d r1~ :'0 the instruction~ below.
t')i~] >>i~:1 -,_, ~,:'d':: c:Y"~'ci L 11
-L;;tj)?)~ ~_-: rm_L'L_
Signa~ur"0 of l~pp.tlC3nt
...2 -2 r; - 7'/')
--------------~--
'C)"'.t",
'./1" (i!..JTH:::~::~'I.::P:..~.J.(J!'.l ':~;F f'!C3E:l'.JT .
-~-----~_..,.,_.__._--_._.__.__._-
~i~t.(2~fk~~~~;~~~ /;17
..-,dZ_~:2.3._~{L_
[}::\tc:~
rr ,'1,1",,\ J -IT-h~h.) .. ~,r.
:A;Z;;~.-.~~
'.",,;. C.:Jr1,:\J,,::,_,i"":':' c~-',' '-\p~J~ ~, :;~".n"
_~,t: ::'V:::!'
.i'- ".'d _.. ..'.. -~c.:r-' ':~:\' \ I ,-;! i"-'
'- !.~,';.- :,:, ~: :~~, :
"':.":1.
2.~.:zb -Cfj
_._ _.. .._. __ UM' ._........ ..... ...~ ~.~ ~L~~._. ~ ..~_._
'..'.:i.t:::
1='l;'1nninq e::?'pt~ "L---\36
~.J..:;;c: .l
. '. ~
t\JOTICE OF LAND USE CHANGE
'NOTICE OF ZONING CHANGE
NOTICE OF TEXT AMENDMENT
The 'City of Boynton Beach proposes to annex, change the use of land,
amend the text of the Comprehensive Plan and rezone the land within the
area shown in the map in this advertisement.
11 public hcaring on these proposals will be held before the planning
alld Zoning Board on June 12, 1990, ilt 7:30 p.m. at City lIall in the
Commission Chambers, 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach,
Florida.
11 public hearing on these proposals will also be held before the City
Commission on June 19, 1990, at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the
agenda permits, at city Hall in the Commission Chambers, 100 East Boynton
Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Florida.
II ! ,'J" .. ..,. .'j"." \, ) I':'.L
t,';~8 iI,.-! :"IL~",. .l. IIJ':.'.', J!,~ldLr OLIi_DJlXNTON ROADI
..~.,,~...: l\II!1i.~'U!11f111l1 I' u__ - -.- ~. .-. i ..
J -- i ftnifiiiiiloili -- -- i
'I ./--~ -- i
~ n! 0 ~"#t~}" __ 0 -_ ~T =- j
Ir~ I llil~i;m r:::~;::S~\I):J,:-:: .1 I
.: IInirlr/l\III1I11J I It. ~ J= 'j~,,::c:~-"~;'l .
I J<~'l !t~'I~;!;::JG :;:~i~."l4: ~ 10 ~j~llr})lI~ .-----!
#1_ .,-\ I
\1\ [1.1'"1.1_ i
It ~,,:D (l- . j
'rrl,~l "l ~~. ___ ~Il. rD cJm . ~ 11_
ll/!/ (~~ 1Il."'~ \l~~l!i( Bw-, PLICAl! N H( I
\1,I}I:1 (!) II__~~~]' -=-~\ 'rldll0.1~\si~dY.: i i;
r' ! '-,{,''', '-' TON AV^~., I
'j () :! fr/..'~''i{j,''', I -~ ~ ~ -: ~\(J " l
. 1 I . f~" -, ~J
, 11'1" i U~-~ 'I., :: -./ -:.~ .~ '.r C-'L' L:'; tlh- -,.,,:,-,,-L-.," .'d..:
Vi'li \pu' 1..' Ii fE li~)>> u,l:r' ~Q.!!.;;~:fc~l:n'v '-- 1,11'#l~'11
_~, ..\ . . ( Il, ." If" I I I I" II ~ '
APPLICATION NO. 1
APPLICANT:
The Winchester Family Partnership, Ltd.
Kilday & Associates
I I
The Winchester Family Partnership, Ltd.
AGENT:
OWNER:
PROJECT NAME: Knuth Road Planned Commercial Development
PROPOSED USE: 120,000 square foot Shopping center
LOCATION: Southwest corner of West Boynton Beach Boulevard and
Knuth Road.
REQUEST:
From - CH/3
(Palm Beach county)
To - Local Retail Commercial
(City of Boynton Beach)
REZONE: From - AR, Agricultural Residential
(Palm Beach County)
To - PCD
(City of Boynton Beach)
AMEND TilE FUTURE LAND
USE PL1IN CONTAINED IN
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLlIN
,
'.. '" APPLICATION NO. 2
APPLICANT: Michael A. schroeder, Trustee
AGENT: Kilday & Associates
OWNER: University of Florida Foundation, Inc.
PROJECT NAME: Boynton Beach Boulevard Planned Commercial Development
PROPOSED USE: 120,000 square foot shopping center
LOCATION: South side of West Boynton Beach Boulevard, between North
Congress Avenue and Knuth Road.
REQUEST:
AMEND THE FUTURE LAND
USE PLAN CONTAINED IN
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
From - RIB
(Palm Beach County)
To - Local Retail Commercial
(City of Boynton Beach)
REZONE: From - AR, Agricultural Residential
(Palm Beach County)
To -
PCD
(City of Boynton Beach)
A copy of the proposed comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning
request is available for review by the pUblic in the City's planning
Department.
All interested parties are notified to appear at said hearings in
person or by attorney and be heard. Any person who decides to appeal any
decision of the Planning & Zoning Board or City Commission with respect to
any matter considered at these meetings will need a record of the
proceedings and for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record
of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
SUZANNE M. KRUSE, CITY CLERK
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
\
,
~ -- --'"
PUBLISH: THE POST
May 27, June 3 & June 10, 1990'
cc: City Commission
City Manager
Planning Director
City At torney
City Mgr's Office Mgr.
I I