AGENDA DOCUMENTS
Requested City Commission
Meetinl! Dates
o November 21, 2000
o December 5, 2000
o December 19,2000
o January 2, 2001
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to Citv Clerk's Office
Requested City Commission
Meetinl! Dates
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to City Clerk's Office
November 9, 2000 (5:00 p.m.) [gI January 16, 2001
November 22, 2000 (5:00 p.rn.) 0 February 6, 2001
December 6. 2000 (5:00 p.rn.) 0 February 20, 2001
December 20, 2000 (5:00 p.m.) 0 March 6, 2001
January J, 2001 (5,00 p,m,)
January 17, 2001 (5:00 p.m.)
February 7, 2001 (5,00 p,m,)
February 21, 2001 (5,00 p,m,)
o Administrative
o Consent Agenda
o Public Hearing
o Bids
o Announcement
o Development Plans
o New Business
~ Legal
o Unfmished Business
o Presentation
RECOMMENDATION: Please place this request on the January 16, 2001 City Commission Agenda under Legal,
Ordinances-2"' Reading, This ordinance was approved on I" Reading by the City Commission on January 2, 2001. The
Planning and Development Board with a 6,0 vote recommended that the subject request be approved (there are no conditions
recommended by staff nor the Planning and Development Board), For further details pertaining to this request see
Department of Development Memorandum No, PZ 00-273,
EXPLANATION:
PROJECT NAME:
AGENT:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
BOYNTON SHOPPES PCD (HEISE PCD)
Robert E, Basehart, Basehart Consulting, Inc,
Boynton Shoppes, LLC
1620 S, Congress Avenue
Request for Major Master Plan Modification/Rezoning to allow for the construction of an
additional 3,000 square foot retail building located on a 0,727 acre outparcel in the Boynton
Shoppes PCD,
FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
PROGRAM IMPACT: N/A
~.I~~
C!:kfrfL'D-.
ALTERNATIVES: N/A
City Manager's Signature
City Attorney / Finance / Human Resources
\\CH\MAIN\SHRDATA\PLANNING\SHAREDlWP\PROlECTS\BOYNTON SHOPPES (RE.ZONING)\CC 1-16-01 AGENDA REQUEST DOT
Requested City Commission
Meetinll Dates
o November 21, 2000
o December 5, 2000
o December 19,2000
r3J January 2, 2001
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
~w 00, f)f) (
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Date Fina] Form Must be Tumed
in to City Clerk's Office
Requested City Commission
Meetinll Dates
Date Final Form Must be Tumed
in to City Clerk's Office
November 9, 2000 (5:00 p.m.) D January 16, 2001
November 22,2000 (5:00 p.m.) 0 February 6, 2001
December 6, 2000 (5,00 p,m.) D February 20, 2001
December 20, 2000 (5:00 p.rn.) D March 6, 200]
January 3, 2001 (5,00 p,m.)
January 17,2001 (5,00 p,m.)
February 7, 2001 (5:00 p.m.)
February 21, 2001 (5,00 p,m,)
D Administrative
D Consent Agenda
D Public Hearing
D Bids
D Announcement
D Development Plans
D New Business
I3l Legal
D Unfmished Business
D Presentation
RECOMMENDATION: Please place this request on the January 2,2000 City Commission Agenda under Ordinances,First
Reading, The City Commission approved this request on December 5, 2000 and the Planning and Development Board with a
6-0 vote recommended that the subject request be approved (there are no conditions recommended by staff nor the Planning
and Development Board), For further details pertaining to this request see Department of Development Memorandum No, PZ
00,273,
EXPLANATION:
PROJECT NAME:
AGENT:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
PROGRAM IMPACT: N/A
/L(J~~
Planning and Zoni g irector
D~L-f!!.,~""o-,
ALTERNATIVES: N/A
BOYNTON SHOPPES PCD (HEISE PCD)
Robert E. Basehart, Basehart Consulting, Inc,
Boynton Shoppes, LLC
1620 S, Congress Avenue
Request for Major Master Plan ModificationlRezoning to allow for the construction of an
additional 3.000 square foot retail building located on a 0,727 acre OUlparcel in the Boynton
Shoppes PCD,
City Manager's Signature
City Attorney I Finance I Human Resources
I\CH\MAIN\SHRDATAIPLANNING'lSHAREDlWPIPROIECTS\BOYNTON SHOPPES (RE.ZONrNG)\CC l-2.0t AGENDA REQUEST DOT
kl=. 1-~ OO,OC
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned
Meetine Dates in to City Clerk's Office
D November 21, 2000
D December 5, 2000
D December 19, 2000
l'8J January 2, 2001
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
Requested City Commission
Meetinl! Dates
Date Final Fonn Must be Turned
in to City Clerk's Office
November 9, 2000 (5:00 p.rn.) 0 January 16, 2001
November 22, 2000 (5:00 p.m.) 0 February 6. 2001
December 6, 2000 (5:00 p,m,) D February 20, 2001
December 20, 2000 (5:00 p.rn.) 0 March 6, 2001
January 3, 2001 (5:00 p.m.)
January 17, 2001 (5:00 p,m.)
February 7, 2001 (5:00 p,m,)
February 21, 2001 (5:00 p,m.)
D Administrative
D Consent Agenda
D Public Hearing
D Bids
D Announcement
D Development Plans
D New Business
l'8J Legal
D Unfmished Business
D Presentation
RECOMMENDATION: Please place this request on the January 2.2000 City Conunission Agenda under Ordinances-First
Reading, The City Conunission approved this request on December 5, 2000 and the Plaruting and Development Board with a
6-0 vote recommended that the subject request be approved (there are no conditions recommended by staff nor the Plamting
and Development Board), For further details pertaining to this request see Department of Development Memorandum No, PZ
00-273,
EXPLANATION:
PROJECT NAME:
AGENT:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
BOYNTON SHOPPES PCD (HEISE PCD)
Robert E. Basehart, Basehart Consulting, Inc,
Boynton Shoppes, LLC
1620 S, Congress Avenue
Request for Major Master Plan ModificationlRezoning to allow for the construction of an
additional 3,000 square foot retail building located on a 0,727 acre outparcel in the Boynton
Shoppes PCD,
FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
PROGRAM IMPACT: NM
7L()-Z:~
Plamting and Zo 'g irector
D.tiit.~,~_,
ALTERNATIVES: N/A
City Manager's Signature
City Attorney / Finance / Human Resources
\\CH\MAIN\SHRDA TA\PLANNINGISHAREDlWP\PROJECTSIBOYNTON SHOPPES (RE-ZONlNG)\CC 1-2-01 AGENDA REQUESTOOT
K&-2-N - 00 - 00 (
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Requested City Commission Date Final Fann Must be Turned
Meeting: Dates in to City Clerk's Office
o November 21,2000
~ December 5. 2000
o December 19, 2000
o January 2, 2001
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
Requested City Commission
MeetiM Dates
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to City Clerk's Office
November 9, 2000 (5:00 p.rn.) 0 January 16,2001
November 22,2000 (5:00 p.rn.) 0 February 6, 2001
December 6, 2000 (5:00 p.rn.) 0 February 20,2001
December 20,2000 (5:00 p.m.) 0 March 6, 2001
January 3, 2001 (5:00 p.m.)
January t 7, 2001 (5:00 p.m.)
February 7, 2001 (5:00 p.m.)
February 21, 2001 (5,00 p,m,)
o Administrative
o Consent Agenda
!2l Public Hearing
o Bids
o Announcement
o Development Plans
o New Business
o Legal
o UnfInished Business
o Presentation
RECOMMENDATION: Please place this request on the December 5,2000 City Commission Agenda under Public
Hearing, The Planning and Development Board with a 6,0 vote recommended that the subject request be approved (there
are no conditions recommended by staff nor the Planning and Development Board), For further details pertaining to this
request see attached Department of DevelOpment Memorandum No, PZ 00,316,
EXPLANATION:
PROJECT NAME:
AGENT:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
PROGRAM IMPACT: NIA
FISCAL IM'PACT: NIA
ALTERNATIVES: NIA
BOYNTON SHOPPES PCD (HEISE PCD)
Robert E, Basehart, Basehart Consulting, Inc.
Boynton Shoppes. LLC
1620 S, Congress Avenue
Request for Major Master Plan ModifIcation to allow for the construction of an additional 3,000
square foot retail building located on a 0,727 acre oulparcel in the Boynton Shoppes PCD,
Iv~~~
Planning and Z . Director
City Manager's Signature
Development Department Director
City Attorney I Finance / Human Resources
]:\SHRDATA\PLANNlNG\SHAREDlWP\PROJECTS\BOYNTON SHOPPES (RE-ZONrNG}\CC 12-5-00 AGE:".'DA REQUEST DOT
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Rfuv- oo~Q)1
Requested City Commission Date Final Fonn Must be Turned
Meeting Dales in to City Clerk's Office
Requested City CommISSIon
Mcetin!!Oates
Date Final Form Must be TUlTlcu
in to City C'lcrk's Office
o July 18,2000
o August 1,2000
o August 15, 2000
o September 6, 2000
July 6, 2000 (5:00 pm.)
o September 19, lOO()
[8J October -t, 20uO
o Octoht:;r 17, 2(1)0
o ;./ovember S, 20UO
September 7. 2000 (5-00 p_m_!
July 19,2000 (5:00 p.m,)
September 20, :2000 (5:00 p_m.)
August 2, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
October 5, 2000 \5:00 p.m.!
August 16,2000 (5:00 p.m.)
October 18, 2000 (5.00 p.m.)
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
o Administrative
o Consent Agenda
IZI Public Hearing
o Bids
o Announcement
o Development Plans
o I\ew Business
o Legal
o Unfinished Business
o Presentation
RECOMMENDATION: Please place this request on the October 4, 2000 City Commission Agenda under Public Hearing,
The Planning and Development Board with a unanimous vote recommended postponement at the request of the applicJnt
(additional time was requested to consider and incorporate final recommendations from staft). For further details pertaining
to this request see attached Department of Development Memorandum 1\0, PZ 00,273
EXPLANATION:
PROJECT NAME:
AGENT.
OWNER:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
BOYNTON SHOPPES PCD (HEISE PCD)
Robert E, Basehart. Basehart Consulting, Inc,
Boynton Shoppes, LLC
1620 S, Congress Avenue
Request for Major Master Plan ModificationfRezoning to allow for the construction of an additional
3,000 square foot building consisting of a 1,500 square foot fast food restaurant with drive-through and
1,500 square feet of retail space,
PROG~IIMPACT: N/A
FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
ALTER1'fATIVES: N/A
Director of Development
City Manager's Signature
/'Ld ) -X~
Director o(Planning n Zoning
City, Attorney / Finance / Human Resources
J ',SIfRDA TA",PLANNING',SffARED,WP'PROJECTSI1l0Y,\;TO:,>/ SHOPPES I RE-ZO~I!"Cil CC I" ~ '"I -\(J[:-'O\ ITE:>1 REQt'EST RfZN OUT
Oct 17 00 03:161"
Ba!u!!j:art
(561)833-3253
1'" 1
t
Basehart Consulting, Inc.
Planners
333 Southern Boulevard, Suite 200
West Palm Beach. FL 33405
Phone: ()6 1)833,3 I 14
Fax; (50 I }B33,3293
E.Mail: baseplan@aol.com
Facsimile
TRANS M ITIAL
TIME:
FROM:
REGARDING:
: (
REFERENCE II:
COMMENTS:
~N~:~l~~~~ ~~:-:e;;: L
-f'bl!eH..uc; :.J..i", ,OVI2f ;o,hQ,,-1-.
ORIGINAL:
o Wll.L
o Wll.L NOT
BE MAILED,
lHE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN TIllS FACSJMILE IS PRIVD.EOED AND CONFIDENTIAL lNFORMA TION
INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE ADDRESSEE_ IF THE READER of THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE
INTENDED RECIPIENT. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR
COpy OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STIUCTLY PROHIBITED, IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS
COMMUNICATIoN IN ERROR, PLEASE lMMEDlATEL Y NOTIFY US BY TELEPHONE,
Oct 17 00 03:18p
Basehart.
(581)833-3293
p.2
Basehart Consulting. Inc.
Planners
333 Southern Boulevard, Suite 200
West Palm Beach, Florida 33405
Phone: (561) 833-3114
fax: (561) 833-3293
October 17, 2000
Mr. Michael Rwnpf, AlCP, Director
Planning & Zoning Department
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
SUBJECT: BOYNTON SHOPPES- REQUEST FOR POSTPONEMENT FROM
NOVEMBER 14, 2000 MEETING TO NOVEMBER 28, 2000 MEETING.
Dear Mr: Rumpf:
Please accept this letter as our request to postpone the above reterenced application from the
November 14.2000 meeting of the Planning & Development Board to their meeting scheduled for
November 28, 2000. It is our understanding that this postponement is necessary bereuse it was not
possible for approval of the hearing notices (for the rezoning and the variance) to be obtained from
the City Attorney's office in time for them to be mailed 30 days in advance of the scheduled meeting
date. It is my understanding that the applications will be heard by the City Council on December
5th.
Very truly yours..:.. ~ ""
~~t,~
R2b~ E. Basehart, AICP
President
co: Marty Heise
Robert Kleinhans
Jon Schmidt
I3~~ ~~
R~"Z- fJ ~oOrO{J1
Facsimile
TAANSMJIT AL
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD
P.O. BOX 310
BOYNTON BEACH, flORIDA 33425-0310
FAX: (561) 742-6259
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
To:
Fax#:
Date:
From:
Re:
f5fJ?~~~, .~(~
- 4~W
Pages:
'J
Planning and Zoning DivIsion
City of Boynton Beach
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
742-6260
Fax: 742-6259
Oct 02 00 04:47F
B~5eh!trt
(561)833-3253
p.2
Basehart Consulting, Inc.
Planners
333 Southern Boulevard, Suite 200
West Palm Beach, Florida 33405
Phone: (561) 833-3114
Fax: (56J) 833-3293
October 2, 2000
Mr, Michael Rumpf, AIC?, Director
Planning & Zoning Department
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
SUBJECT: BOYNTON SHOPPES- REQUEST TO REMAND PROJECT BACK TO
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (TRC) FOR OCTOBER 10, 2000
MEETING.
Dear Mr: Rwnpf:
This lener i. to request that the Boynton Shoppes applications be remanded back to the TRC for their
meeting scheduled for October 10,2000, We understand that this will also require that the PllllUling
& Development Board hearing(s) on this project, scheduled for that same day, will have to be
postponed and re-advertised for their November 14, 2000 meeting. The project will then proceed
to the City Council for approval of the variance and first reading on the rezoning on November 21st
and final adoption on December Sth. The reason for this revised hearing schedule is that the applicant
has agreed to make substantial revisions to the proposed site plan and the proposed use of the
building, to reduce 6e number of variances that we are requesting from 4 tc I,
As we discussed at our meetir.g on September 28th, the applicant has dedded to drop the fast food
restaurant use. This will allow us to eliminate the drive-through window and lane, and therefore
eliminate OUI need for a variance from the east side landscape buffer width, We will also be able to
slightly relocate the building easterly, thereby eliminating the west side perimeter landscape buffer
variance Further, this change will result in the reduction of the driveway uaffic volume sutliciently
to reduce the driveway throat requirement to 50 feet, which can be accorr.modated by our plan, This
will eliminate the need for a'1other variance. We we will submit our revised plans at the October lOth
TRC meeting.
Very truly yo~ ~ h
c:;Ul->l+('~
;x:~ ~. Basehart, AlC?
President
08/10/2000 02:35 5515824534
BASEHART
PAGE 01
t
Basehart Consulting, Inc.
Planners
333 Southern Boulevard, Suite 200
Wesr Palm Beach, FL 33405
Phone: (561)833.3114
Fa><: (561)833-3293
Fao.lmll.
TRANSMITTAL
S-\()- QC)
t>\ <..l<-, \-\Ot:>:5.\ N
MPANY: ~\17 o~ ~,.:noN
FROM: ~b~~
~ ~7~~ ~(:)~ES
PA.GES (INCLUDING COVER): .3
FAXNI( ) l.75-t.'2S\
DA. TEl
TIME:
COMMENTS:
b\<..\~ -
~E~ "UR.. <"..\)~
"S\ ~ ~R ~~ _ :..= ~~ S~W~
R~2l:>~It-\~ .
~ ~€U\.~ 'IOU ~\Ie <=':\L}..~ INCi- g.'<.J:... N~
~
ORIGINAL.
WILL
o WILL NOT
o B~M....n.RJ)
lHE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN lHlS PACSlMll.E IS PRIVD..EGEO AND CONFIDEN'J1AL INFORMATION
INTENDED ONL Y POR 1lIE USE OF THE ADDRESSEE. IF THE READER OF nus MESSAGE IS NOT THE
INTENDED RECIPIENT. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED niAT ANY DISSEMINATION. DISTlUBUTION OR
COpy 01' THIS COMMtlNICATION IS STRlCTI.Y PkOHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE R1!CElVED lHIS
COMMUNICATION IN ERROIt.,PLEASE lMMEDlATEL Y NOTIFY US BY l'ELBPHONE.
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
Division of Planning and Zoning
Building
Planning & Zoning
Engineering
Occupational License
Community Redevelopment
July 26, 2000
Mr. Robert E. Basehart
Basehart Consulting, Inc.
333 Southern Boulevard-Suite 200
West Palm Beach, Florida 33405
Re: Heise PCD (aka Boynton Shoppes PCD)
REZN 00-001
Dear Bob:
Staff has checked the application you submitted for rezoning of the above mentioned property and has
found the following information was not included in the submittal package:
. Property owners mailing list for all properties within 400' of the subject property, postage
and labels or envelopes;
. Copy of Property Appraiser's map showing properties referenced above;
. Justification statement for the requested rezoning;
. Statements of additional impacts, i.e. water, sewer, drainage and traffic, that are to be
expected as a result of the requested rezoning.
You were probably aware that these were not included with the original submittal and are planning to
provide them at a later date; however, staff canna! begin analysis of the project until the application is
complete. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 742-6264.
Sincerely,
~tI
Dick Hudson, AICP
Senior Planner
J:\SHRDA TA\PLANNING\HUDSON\BOYNTONSHOPPESREZMADOmONALINFO.DOC
America's Gateway to the Gulfstream
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 375-6260 FAX: (561) 375-6259
"
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO, 00-316
TO:
Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
IIJr..f.=
Michael W. Rumpf -
Planning and Zoning Director
Dick Hudson -l~--
Senior Planner
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
November 13, 2000
SUBJECT:
Boynton Shoppes PCD (fka Heise PCD) (REZN 00-001)
Major Master Plan Modification/Rezoning (addition of restaurant and
retail space)
INTRODUCTION
Robert Basehart of Basehart Consulting, Inc., agent for Boynton Shoppes PCD (f.k.a. Heise
PCD), is proposing a major modification to this PCD which occupies 3.63 acres of property
located approximately 220 feet east of the southeast comer of Congress Avenue and
Woolbright Road (see attached location map in Exhibit nAn). The proposed modification is
for the addition of 3,000 square feet of tetail space/fast food restaurant. The original master
plan includes an 8,085 square foot building designated for retail use, and a 10,446 square foot
automotive repair center comprised of three bays; 1,612 square feet for oil changes, 1,818
square feet for a detail shop, and 7,015 square feet for tire sales and installation. The future
land use classification will remain LRC (Local Retail Commercial).
BACKGROUND
The Boynton Shoppes PCD master plan was approved in 1997, which was preceded
(accompanied) by an amendment to the code that was required to reduce the minimum
acreage of a PCD from 5 acres to 3 acres. This amendment was required to allow for the
subject 3.63-acre property to be rezoned accordingly. The property was developable under
the then C-3 zoning, but not for the automobile care uses desired by the applicant. The repair
of automobiles or tire sales and service are not allowed on sites less than 5 acres in size
within the C-3 district, and as indicated above, the minimum size of a PCD was 5 acres. To
minimize the city-wide impacts ofa code change, the peD regulations were the target of their
amendment request.
Page 2
Boynton Shoppes PCD
File No. REZN 00-00 I
PROCEDURE
Pursuant to the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section
6.F. (Planned Commercial Developments), when modifications to approved plans for a PCD
result in an increase of ten (10) percent or more in measurable impacts such as traffic created,
water used, sewage or stormwater generated, or some other comparable measure, the request
must be processed as a new application for zoning to PCD. Furthermore, according to
Chapter 2, Section 9 (Administration and Enforcement), when a rezoning request does not
require an amendment to the future land use map, staff analysis is not required to include an
evaluation of the project using the eight criteria under Section 9.C.7. Since this request is
only for rezoning (and major master plan modification), the above-described analysis is not
required. The analysis contained herein evaluates the changes to the proposed master plan,
issues of particular concern, and includes selected portions of the above-described criteria
that pertain to impacts upon municipal services, and compatibility with adjacent properties.
The emphasis of this analysis is on the intent of the peD regulations compared to the
proposed amendment.
ADJACENT LAND USES AND ZONING
The land uses and zoning in the surrounding area vary and are presented in the table that
follows:
North
Right-of-way of vi oolbright Road then farther north, office commercial under
development including a bank and medical office buildings zoned Office
Professional (C-!)
East
Bank; zoned Community Commercial (C-3) then farther east multi-story office
building; zoned Community Commercial (C-3)
South
Multi-family residential; zoned Multi-family (R-3)
West'
Service Station and fast food restaurant; zoned Community Commercial (C-3)
then farther west, Congress Avenue right-of-way
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The applicant is proposing this major modification to the Boynton Shoppes PCD in order to
add additional retaiVrestaurant square footage to the existing master plan. The addition will
be made on that portion of the property fronting on Woolbright Road (see Proposed Master
Plan - Exhibit "B"). The applicant estimates that upon completion, the facility will employ
approximately 35 people (full and part-time). Compatibility of the proposed use with the
surrounding land uses is discussed below.
Page 3
Boynton Shoppes PCD
File No. REZN 00-001
The Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section "F"-Planned Commercial
Development District, contains the following site regulations with which this proposal must
comply:
Minimum perimeter setbacks..................................... front
side
40 feet
30 feet (a separate request for a
variance is being submitted to
reduce the side yard setback by
17.5 feet to 12.5 feet)
40 feet
rear
Minimum land area....................................................3 acres
Maximum lot coverage ..............................................40 percent
Minimum peripheral greenbelt width ........................10 feet; 25 feet when abutting residential
use
Maximum structure height.........................................45 feet
ISSUESIDISCUSSION
A) CONSISTENCY OF REZONING WITH ESTABLISHED LAND USE PATTERN
In general, the proposed uses are compatible with the established land use pattern, as the
surrounding uses are of a commercial nature. The additions to the master plan are to be
located between the service station/fast food restaurant to the west and the bank to the east.
B) COMPATIBILITY OF PROPOSED REZONING WITH PUBLIC FACILITIES
At the time of master plan approval, a review for concurrency certification was conducted for
drainage and traffic facilities. Concurrency certification was issued after the determination
that adopted levels-of-service standards would be met. The impacts on facilities of the
additions to the site plan as a result of the rezoning are as follows:
WATER AND SEWER DEMANDS: Impacts to the water and sewer systems are estimated
to increase potable water demand by 2,650 gallons/day and to increase sanitary sewer demand
by 2,650 gallons/day.
DRAINAGE: The project applicant has submitted a drainage statement and preliminary
drainage plan to demonstrate that the project meets the City's drainage standards.
Page 4
Boynton Shoppes PCD
File No. REZN 00-001
ROADWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS: A traffic analysis has been submitted for the
proposed modification to supplement the traffic analysis submitted at the time of initial
approval.
These and other site impacts are further addressed in the staff reports on the corresponding
site plan and variance applications that are being requested concurrently with this request for
master plan modification.
C) ANTICIPATED ISSUES RELATED TO PROJECT DESIGN
According to the PCD regulations, the intent and purpose of the PCD district is "to provide a
zoning classification for commercial developments that will better satisfy current demands
for commercially zoned land by encouraging development .which will reflect changes in the
concepts and technology of land development and relate the land development to the specific
site..." Approval of the PCD in 1997 would indicate that the site plan and range of uses
satisfied the intent and purpose of the PCD district. The question that must be answered now
is, "do the additions to the master plan continue to provide for efficient and harmonious
design, arranged so as to create an attractive project readily integrated with and having no
adverse effect on adjoining or surrounding areas and developments?"
A site plan application for' this project has been submitted, which contains detailed
information regarding layout and architecture of proposed buildings, landscaping, drainage
and vehicular circulation on the site. The addition to the PCD would be a single building
containing 3,000 square feet fronting on Woolbright Road. The proposed design of the
structure is of the same style and employs the same colors used for the buildings that have
been constructed on the site. This is consistent with the Community Design Plan which
requires that "buildings or stn/ctures which are part of a present or fitture multi-building
complex, shall achieve visual unity of character and design concepts through the relationship
of building style, use, texture, color, materials, form, scale, proportion and location".
According to the PCD regulations, the intent and purpose of the PCD district is "to provide a
zoning classification for commercial developments that will better satisfy current demands
for commercially zoned land by encouraging development which will reflect changes in the
concepts and technology of land development and relate the land development to the specific
site..." With the approval of the amendment to the code that reduced the minimum size of a
PCD to three acres, the original master plan generally satisfied the intent and purpose of the
PCD regulations.
Project quality, in part, is a factor of all site design requirements working in unison. It is
difficult to compromise anyone of those requirements without jeopardizing the overall
quality of the development, which in turn impacts the quality of adjacent developments. The
ultimate layout and circulation within a master plan should be optimal given the intent of the
Page 5
Boynton Shoppes PCD
File No. REZN 00-001
system to facilitate comprehensive reviews at time of initial submittal. The applicant was
aware of all site constraints and applicable regulations when PCD zoning, and the text
amendment, were originally pursued, which was likely the reason that the original master
plan did not propose useslbuildings within the subject location on the master plan.
In working with the applicant through the rezoning process, staff was able to reduce the total
variances requested to one, retain the full perimeter buffer, eliminate a proposed drive-thru
feature and reduce parking spaces to minimize possible on-site congestion at the entrance.
Therefore staff has determined that the current proposal may well be the minimum
compromise in development standards that will be necessary in order for the practicable
development of the vacant portion of the site.
CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDA TrONS
Relative to architectural style and use, the subject projec-t would be compatible with the
various styles and commercial uses of adjacent properties, and therefore satisfies one intent of
the city's PCD regulations. As indicated herein, the proposed variance request would be the
minimum necessary to satisfy the intent of the regulations "to accomplish a more desirable
environment for commercial development in relation to existing and/or future city
development", to "promote the public health, safety, convenience, welfare", and to provide
efficient and harmonious design so as to create an attractive project", Based on the analysis
and discussions contained herein, staff recommends that the subject request for a major
master plan modification be approved. If the Planning and Development Board and the City
Commission approve the requested rezoning and master plan modification subject to
conditions those conditions will be listed within Exhibit "C"-Conditions of Approval.
Enclosures
\\CH\MAfN\SHRDAT A\Planning\sHARED\WP\PROJECTS\BoyTlIOn Shoppcs (Re-Zoning)\m.ff repo"~.BoynlonShoppes,doc
I. 1..: :;
I '
I I
, ,
-93
......' I
_ ,'~~i '...
.\ " \ ,-"
'J , , ; I
'1
"
':
d
'[
- . - -
'r--> i-' ,
, >-----' I
r.~~'~ L/'-{\
i..-J <'=1 "
-rl .b .~
'~;:U~>
~::''':.:.~Ih'
:~, .L-)H'
~~)>G'<T; ;~1J
. ,,' ,..>, I i: :
1: ....... I. I _'_
~.
- ....-'- .:._-
-- 1--
=- '~-- -i-
-'
-
-
)1
/.
---. .
/.
f
?;?' -- -\,
i:
- J l,
0' '//1:
,.
il
W-~ ..1- -- -- -- --
~:
'.
~ - --
J!---
.,
,
- ' -
! 1
;
. i
i:
i1
1
I I
~ , ~ -
'-.'~EXMIBIT "A'~
, - ':~:~"LOCATION'//+'/
, '--- )::c- .' ,I,
'i J;~, " " I
/ :. .. 1
~ ..
........ -
.
, .
v
,
~,
_.~
::".'T\.
-- L J
.
r
f\
....-
, .
1 . ~
. =,o..o~'~~ j l~
. , r....
;".[E~c
--~
I
,
-- . ,
. ~-=r;.; ;x:;:-,.,.__
, i'j-<
9.-.----.~-~
- ~ - --, ~
L- --.' I Y'r'-l .
'f . 'll : a
, . , ----4ol
"-=~~~ Z;,
I ' :, '~
' . j J . r 1
I. I '.
.1~~'.',
I ---
: ,
I 1~ r
,
!U'
"
""
I .
,W
:>
,<
J .
en
en
w
c:
C)
z
o
C.l
-, --
~
...,
io.. ..:J;;::K'.... :~U..':_,,-_ :c1,') ':""-, .
,
.:('- - - _.- - - . -. -----
...
:', ,'~ .::..oc:H.''':::::':X''' ~ ;--.';:
~
~
!
\'~
, '
---. ---- -. .
, ''". ~ .
- -Ti~ '-"---~-G-"-:---
C1
!
~3
..
SITE- __~OOLBRIGHT ROAD..
J ,"', 1 I
~~{:. "i' I, ~\_-J,~~
~r- it. :~~j"', " '.' \ ~ ' "
J -1~J--+- -~ \ \ 1-
Q-. _'l. " - ..{''\ I
1 . ....-( \
)~__.' - . .( ,......-0' ~
L -Lr . 11 --. . ~
.1 '''1..... -KD ,.,..Jr
-dV ' .' J ~~<
.. . ---- I, I n
"""1 "1 ,~ T
,,) I : L'
~ . _ _..;' ....; -L.-
( "1(' -".
- , ".! '
.' , J L"l
. ,\
-j'. ~~-~~^-< \~ R '
f ]'~ Q} --':~fj~:---' _:.~\ '. ' ,
L..-, _ per I ' ' ;>'j^-.." . 7:
L_....... I F - --- 7 .....
~ ,~'-~', - ---, - - . -, 1;- , '-;
--l r- __v L- 4- -..... /- ... i 'y/
-- f .,......, -,---.J '. f2 9t ...,.
-- /' ~~.J- ...-'1-1"'" ., 'J I ----/.. 1---7' ...
, l.., f r.. ... - -- .-.../ ~ _ - I'---""'l.. t
..- f1. \' " I :... ,~
, ,,' _____ ' --," ......r
{J . '1- ' U . .r--<,,::, ~_;.......
'1 ' ,. , a " , , - - - -'- "
I" ,.ll~ H .. . - J \ ""7'"~-
. ~ ----.-J '".......- '1, '1' I -- '--' ----r--~
'I
I,
, I
Ii
~ I
!
i i
, .
t~KE\~' I'll
J \'
l i
\p. If!
J, I
II I
J I
,
,~
~I
j
I,
"
I
....... .....
................
.................
................
I
i
:J3
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:........
.................
..11......0.....',........
" .
. .., . . . .
... ......
. ....
. .. . ..
. . ..
. ..... .
. ...... .
.............
................
.................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
................
................
.................
................
.................
................
.................
................
................. .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I
r- ....,
EXHIBIT "C"
Conditions of Approval
Project name; BOYNTON SHOPPES pcn (fka Heise pcno
File number: REZN 00-00 I
Reference; Maior Master Plan Modification/Rezoning (addition of 3000 so.ft. restaurant and retail snace)
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments: NONE X
UTILITIES
Comments: NONE X
FIRE
Comments: NONE X
POLICE
Comments: NONE X
ENGINEERING DMSION
Comments: NONE X
BUILDING DMSION
Comments: NONE X
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments; NONE X
FORESTERJENVJRONMENTALIST
Comments: NONE X
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments: NONE X
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
1. None. X
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
2. To be determined.
J:\SHRDATA\PlanningISHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynlon Shoppes (Re-Zoning)\ 11_28.00 P&D COND OF APPROV ALdoc,doJ dim
-i
.
8.
OTHER
BOYNTON SHOPPES 2):OVc P~.'\
-- .----.,.--. ~.."-"~..,_._---------------
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 98-249
.
FROM:
Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
(11,,/2'-
Michael W. Rumpf
Acting Director of Planning & Zoning
TO:
DATE:
August 20, 1998
SUBJECT:
Boynton Shoppes - Approval history and status
Issue: Conditions of approval relative to project phasing and service bay doors
Notes on Project Approval and Conditions Relative to Phasing and Service Bay Doors
Rezoned
C-3 to Planned Commercial Development
PCD)
Staff proposes comment #21 which references the Community Design Plan in prohibiting
overhead doors from facin the street (see Exhibit" A" )
Staff ro oses comment #32 r uirin that the buildin s be connected with archwa .
Comment #21 ultimately approved prohibiting bay doors from facing the street (see Exhibit
"B")
Comment #32 ultimatel a roved re uirin an archwa between buildin s
No comments made relative to phasing, however, the minutes recorded the statement made by
Board Member Rosenstock indicating that the retail building would block views of the bay
doors from the south,
Site Ian a roved Se ember 2, 1997
Staff proposes comment #61 that repeats the original rezoning condition relative to connection
of buildin s with an archwa (see Exhibit "CO).
The site plan shows service bay doors oriented south, therefore avoiding similar comments
generated during rezoning review relative to the facing of bay doors to the street (see Exhibit
"C" .
Pursuant to a recommendation by the Planning & Development Board. comment #61 was
omitted in the fmal approval, therefore. archways connecting the buildings would not be
re u~.ed.
A ain, there is no indication of it.
July 1, 1997
(ordinance approved on September 2, 1997)
Current Status
The service buildings have been permitted and work has commenced. With respect to the retail
building. permit plans for this portion of the project have been submitted to the city and are
currently being reviewed. However, coincidentally, the developer has recently submitted a
request to place the retail building in a second phase. Although it is our understanding that the
developer is now prepared to construct the retail portion of the project (based on his current
request for building permits), given the progress to date on the service buildings, the service
buildings will be completed prior to completion of the retail building, and therefore. this
request for phasing is to allow the developer to receive a separate certificate of occupancy
/
Page 2
Boynton Shoppes - Approved history and status
Memorandum No. Planning and Zoning Department 98-249
(C.O.) for the service buildings prior to completion of the retail building (as the preject was
not approved with a phasing plan, the city requires that all portions of the project be approved
simultaneously). Staff is not opposed to allowing the completion of,the service buildings prior
to the retail building, as long as efforts proceed in "good faith" to construct the retail building.
In the past, staff has utilized a "temporary" C.O, to allow the use of a completed portion of a
project while the remainder of the project is completed, If the remaining obligations are not
addressed prior to the expiration of the "temporary" C.O., the city commits to halting the use
of such property until the remaining portions of the property are completed. The city may be
more wi11ing to issue a temporary approval in this case once the developer starts construction
on the retail portion of the project.
Attachments
S:\Plannilll\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\AulO Care updaIe 10 PkD.doc
.....
~
EXHIBIT A
Page 4
Heise, PCD
File No. REZN 97-001
REZONING CONDITIONS - PROPOSED
attorney designated by the city attorney,
b) Exhibit "A" shall include the recorded deed or deeds of all
properties included within the subject request and the deeds
shall include the legal description of each property.
c) Exhibit "B", shall include a separate. legal description of the
entire property included in the subject' request Where
applicable. the legal description shall combine all individual
properties that are part of the request into one legal
description, The legal description shall indicate the total acres
and be signed and sealed by the surveyor of record for the
project, The surveyor shall certify that the legal description is
a correct representation of the property identified in Exhibit" A"
and is the same property identified for the
_ PCD property request to rezone the subject property from
Community Commercial, C-3 to a Planned Commercial
Development (PCD) zoning district, as identified in the
application submitted to the City of Boynton Beach on March
5,1997.
d) The original executed and notarized document shall be
submitted to the city for review by the citv attornev.
:::;> 21.
The building design shall meet the Community Design Plan,
including the location of overhead doors so they are not facing the
~re~. .
22.
Provide consistency regarding depictions of setback requirements
for the site, The required front yard (facing Congress) setback in a
PCD is 40 feet Dimension all building setbacks.
23.
On the master plan, show required s~back along Woolbright
Road,
24.
Provide consistency with regard to the name of the project. Master
plan shows Boynton Shoppes, PCD and shows Heise PCD,
25.
Provide a unity of title document for Tract "A" and Tract "B".
,
26. It is recommended, that the south perimeter landscape buffer
contain, at minimum. ground cover, a three foot high berm. a six
foot high concrete' block wall, clusters of three shrubs or palm
trees every 30 feet, a 36 inch high hedge and canopy trees 12 feet
tall with a maximum spacing of 30 feet on center. The north, east
and west buffer shall be the same as the north buffer, but without
the wall. Fifty (50) percent of all the landscape material in each of
the above buffers shall be native Florida species.
I?
.;;c;
_____n_.____" _ ~_.'n_.____._
,
Page 5
Heise, PCD
File No. REZN 97-001
.
:;>
,
27. Include a vicinity sketch, as required by the code, showing existing
development on adjacent properties in the immediate vicinity of the'
subject site and existing natural features.
28. Provide statement of the subsurface conditions.
..
29. Indicate location of all proposed easements.
30. Eliminate conflict between proposed utility and access easement
and the proposed 25 feet wide peripheral greenbelt at the southern
end of the property by abandoning and relocating the easement. If
the easement can't be abandoned and relocated. separate the
buffer location from the easement.
31. Indicate the use of the portion of the property immediately east of
the Woolbright Road egresslingress driveway. If this area is to be
an open space it is recommended, that the egresslingress
driveway location be moved approximately 22 feet east to a more
central location of this part of the parcel. Also, it is recommended
that this entrance be appropriately landscaped to beautify the
entrance from Woolbright Road to the development.
32. Connect the retail and service buildings with a decorative archway
that would allow vehicle passage, Archway may exceed 23 feet
in height.
33. It is recommended that continuous (except where vehicular and
pedestrian connections) foundation landscaping be provided along
the north. south and west building elevations,
34. It is recommended that the front of the building(s) be moved back
(approximately 10 feet) from Congress Avenue to align with the
McDonald's1Amoco building and that the ...dditional distance gained
be located along Congress Avenue to increase the width of the
west buffer.
35. It is recommended that Spanish .S. tiles (terracotta blend),
comparahle to those used on McDonald's/Amoco be added to the
building..
36. It is recommended that a stucco wall finish painted beige, antique
white or another close-matching color combination similar to
McDonald's/Amoco be used..
37. It is recommended that trim or accent colors be changed to match
the blue used on McDonald's Amoco.
q..
EXHIBIT B
Page 4
Heise. pce
File No. REZN 97-001
REZONING CONDITIONS - EXECUTED
.
;>
attorney designated by the city attorney. ..
b) Exhibit "A" shall include the recorded deed o~ deeds of all
properties included within the subject request and the deeds
shall include the legal description of each property.
c) Exhibit "B", shall include a separate legal description of the
entire property included in the s~bject request. Where
applicable, the legal description shall combine all individual
properties that are part of the request into one legal
description. The legal description shall indicate the total acres
and be signed and sealed by the surveyor of record for the
project. The surveyor shall certify that the legal description is
a correct representation of the property identified in Exhibit" A"
and is the same property identified for the
_ PCD property request to rezone the subject property from
Community Commercial, C-3 to a Planned Commercial
Development (PCD) zoning district, as identified in the
application submitted to the City of Boynton Beach on March
5,1997,
d) The original executed and notarized document shall be
submitted to the city for review bv the citY attorney.
21. The building design shall meet the Community Design Plan, \/
including the location of overhead doors so they are not facing the
street.
22, Provide consistency regarding depictions of setback requirements /
for the site. The required front yard (facing Congress) setback in a
PCD is 40 feet. Dimension all buildina setbacks.
23. On the master plan, show required setback along Woolbright -I
Road,
24. Provide consistency with regard to the name of the projuct, Master ./
plan shows Boynton Shoppell, PCD and shows Heise PCD.
25. Provide a unitY of title document for Tract" A" and Tract "S'. ./
. -
26. It is recommended. that the south perimeter landscape buffer
contain, at minimum, ground cover, a three foot high berm, a six j
foot high concrete block wall, clusters of three shrubs or palm
trees every 30 feet, a 36 inch high hedge and canopy trees 12 feet
tall with a maximum spacing of 30 feet on center, The north, east
and west buffer shall be the same as the north buffer, but without
the wall. Fifty (50) percent of all the landscape material in each of
the above buffers shall be native Florida species.
~
Page 5
Heise, PCD
File No. REIN 97-001
.
=;>
,
27. Include a vicinity sketch, as required by the code, showing existing vi
development on adjacent properties in the immediate vicinity of the
subiect site and existino natural features.
28. Provide statement of the subsurface conditions. /'
.
- vi'
29. Indicate location of all oroposed easements,
30. Eliminate conflict between proposed utility and access easement
and the proposed 25 feet wiele peripheral greenbelt at the southern vi'
end of tile property by abandoning and relocating the easement. If
the easement can't be abandoned and relocated. separate the
buffer location from the easement,
31. Indicate the use of the portion of the property immediately east of
the Woolbright Road egresslingress driveway. If this area is to be
an open space it is recommended, that the egresslingress ~
driveway location be moved approximately 22 feet east to a more
central location of this part of the parcel. Also, it is recommended
that this entrance be appropriately landscaped to beautify the
entrance from Woolbriaht Road to the development.
32, Connect the retail and seNice buildings with a decorative archway V
that would allow vehide passage, Archway may exceed 23 feet
in heiaht.
33. It is recommended that continuous (except where vehicular and -I
pedestrian connections) foundation landscaping be provided along
the north, south and west buildina elevations,
34. It is recommended that the front of the building(s) be moved back
(approximately 10 feet) from Congress Avenue to align with the vi
McDonald'slAmoco building and that the additional distance gained
be located along Congress Avenue to increase the width of the
west buffer.
35. It is recommended that Spanish 'S' tiles (terracotta blend), vi
comparabl", to those used on McDonald'slAmoco be added to the
buildina"
36. It is recommended that a stucco wall finish pain led beige, antique I
white or another close-matching color combination similar to
McDonald'slAmoco be used"
37. It is recommended that trim or accent colors be changed to match (
the blue used on McDonald's Amoco.
!/>
EXHIBIT B
MA::sTER PlAN PROPOSED AT REZONIN~ypical Parking Detail _
Land Use
Office II I_ ~~
Zoning .i __ ~
C,\ Woolbllghf Road c; ~ 6. 6. t- _::::::.......
saTcarw 117.:r .- ",-wf
- ~\... - ~_' _u _.:... ~~
_"~C''- ~~I' - 'j - .- -' - -1 l fr-~~
I II: I
'I' ,
I ,
~ 1'1 :
f ~ ll~
, 9_ I I'
!a Ii,
I I
.:-~r' ! 1: I
_"'-0 -=- , I
~. 11:_
I ,. - ..,.~ 22'''' =:=I )_ '
Ii ! :-11 II;; I -t ,': \.. 5 I
-' -, .1-
" ,. ." ( ..---. I
~ I...:..b---~ ~='~) -- ". - - iI
SI! ::.:= ----n.~.~-- l r~~ 1 I
I:i L, f.!': 1"'~~5.'l~"~ -j:P- -!I~ l~
l-. E ---- ... I I :::i;:
.. =- ':',-' -'I
GO __\_h.\ __.;;-'~ "I I __
~ :~...::: -:f~ .:::; .~ ~ (- -., ~. 1__
~..- I ~1lI ( '! n J,-
<( -....---... I... J_ .g (y....- -- ,I L-3
~ -.. . --, J- U . /
~ ,- . " j.- --;: " -,-"/
o 1.... -/ - -.... -l _
u .':, . ~
"'.. _ 5 I' J !.,
~
-
....
'0",..
.......
.........""
"""'"
Amoco/"~
"
..
o
u
~
= Ol
C C,.,
.J C '
.: C U
tJ _,
a;
'"
;;
u
o
-'
.~
-
.It..
1....
L-'~
,
i
9"
9"
J.
. I"i
! I.
--
0>6-
L
- - &!; - -I
Il---T ;-i---- --/
"=-.J ,J
PJ! [_I
- -
HlTIDOI""i 'OJ',,,,
Land Use
High Densrty Restdermol 02.B Du.J Ac.)
Zoning
R1AA-PUD
~
.....--
-
5" 12:'
/
~
N
g'
.. urn
- -~~
, _ _ _.-J:
J-"=-
:g
\!
~
iE
~ 02...
6~~u
~~
c
g
~
~.
N
EXHIBIT C
Page 8
Heise PCD
NWSP 97-006
Sm:: PLAN CONDITIONS - PROPOSED
..
~
56, There is an existing buffer wall located on the Chri~stian Villas
property south of the proposed development. If the existing
buffer wall meets, or can be upgraded to meet, the proposed
buffer design guidelines with respect to the height, exterior finish
and the required setback, the proposed buffer wall on the Auto
Care Center of America property can be omitted, subject to
providing an appropriate upgrade and perpetual maintenance
agreement between Christian Villas and Auto Care Center of
America prior to a certificate'of occupancy being issued for the
first buildina on the PCD proDertv.
57. Exterior utility boxes, meters, transformers, etc. shall be screened
from public view by a buffer wall or continuous vegetative buffer
as required by the Landscape Code (Land Development
Regulations, Chapter 9, Section 10,C).
58. Although required by the code, signage information was not
submitted as a part of the site plan application. Another formal
submittal containing signage will have to be made and presented
to the Planning and Development Board and City Commission for
approval.
59. In order to eliminate potential vehicular conflicts between vehicles
backing-up from service bays of the tire store and oil change
building onto a main driveway of the complex, it is recommended
that the configuration of the detail shop and tire store will be
reversed. Move the tire store to the north and install mirrors to
allow access to bays from the secondary driveway,
60, Increase the width of the sidewalk in front of all buildings to a
minimum of 7 feet and provide a two foot wide planting area as
required by Planning and Development Board at the time of
rezonina approval.
61, In order to enhance uniformity of the complex, it is recommended
that all three buildings be connected by an arcade placed over
the sidewalk located in front of the structOres, (see attached
sketch of proposed building connections)
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
CONDITIONS ,
62. To be determined,
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
63. To be determined.
/7 <7
Fage 8
Heise PCD
NWSP 97-006
EXHIBIT D
s~ PLAN CONDITIONS - EXECUTED
=;>
I .. :1
56. There is an existing buffer wall located on the Christian Villas
, I
: property south of the proposed development. -If the existing ,
buffer wall meets, or can be upgraded to meet, the proposed I
,
buffer design guidelines with respect to the height, exterior finish ' 1/ , !
,
and the required setback, the proposed buffer wall on the Auto I
\
Care Center of America property can be omitted. subject to :
providing an appropriate upgrade and perpetual maintenance I
I
agreement between Christian Villas and Auto Care Center of I
America prior to a certificate of occupancy being issued for the I
I
first buildinQ on the PCD property. I
57. Exterior utility boxes. meters, transformers. etc. shall be screened /
from publiC view by a buffer wall or continuous vegetative buffer
as required by the landScape Code (Land Development I
ReQulations, Chapter 9. Section 10.C).
,
58. Although required by the code. signage information was not I
~ i
submitted as a part of the site plan application. Another formal I
submittal containing signage will have to be made and presented
to the Planning and Development Board and City Commission for I
approval. I
59. In order to eliminate potential vehicular conflicts between vehicles ~ l
backing-up from service bays of the tire store and oil change
building onto a main driveway of the complex, it is recommended
that the configuration of the detail shop and tire store will be .., , ,.
reversed, Move the tire store to the north and install mirrors to \..1'. " /.;...
allow access to bays from the secondary driveway,
60. Increase the width of the sidewalk in front of all buildings to a ./
minimum of 7 feet and provide a two foot wide planting area as
required by Planning and Development Board at the time of ',,_/~:'! .~/'"
rezoninQ oval.
,
61. In order to enhance uniformity of the complex. it is recommended i/
that all three buildings be connected by an arcade placed over
the sidewalk located in front of the structures. (see attached '..L "'78
sketch of proposed building connections)
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
CONDITIONS
62. Delete comment no. 12. V
63. Reword comment no, 14 to read as follows: Change "Typical V'
Parl<ing Detail" to be consistent with revised comment 60.
64. Delete comment no. 19, i/
/NaL4:lt!: ~""t:c::r
'.
q
Page 9
Heise PCD
NWSP 97-006
/N'~ ~~
65. Delete comment no. 20. .. iI
~ V
66. Delete comment no, 21.
67. Delete comment no. 22. V-
68. Delete comment no. 34. V
.'
69. Reword comment no. 35 to read as follows: It is recommended,
that the south perimeter landscape buffer contain, at minimum,
Jround cover, an average 18 inch high berm, a six foot high
concrete block wall, clusters of three shrubs or palm trees every //
30 feet, a 24 inch high hedge and canopy trees 12 feet tall with a
maximum spacing of 30 feet on center, The north, east and west
buffer shall be the same as the south buffer, but without the wall,
At minimum, 50 percent of the landscape material in each of the
above buffers shall be Florida native species,
70. Delete comment no. 37. I/'
71. Delete comment no. 40. V
72. Delete comment no. 42. i/
73. Delete comment no. 43. V
74. Reword comment no. 46 to read as follows: It is recommended t/
that the trim and scoring proposed on the west elevations be
extended to all other elevations and that the front arch and pillar
theme be carried to the side and rear locations.
75. Delete comment no, 51. //'
V ,
76. Delete comm1nt no, 59,
77. Reword comment no. 60 to read as follows: Increase the width of
the sidewalk in front of all buildings to a minimum of 5 feet and V
provide a two foot wide planting area as required by the
Planning and Development Board at the time of rezoning
approval.
78. Delete comment no. 61. V
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
79. To be determined.
=>
Ibme
s:projectslautocar\cond of appr
10
I blot"';!
.......-
I
Lanu use
Oftlce
Zontng
c-!
EXHIBIT 0
SITE PLAN
TypiC:JI Parking Detoil_
.-
Ilw.
-
/i'" .
11(l~ >tt>(H; b
11- Sf1
6.
--..
'-
woo:-.::: ,,1
1 0.. .cD ........
,,_, ___.... .. _,. ___ , _, . _ sarl1r1lfW 117.3' ,... - - I
,:.-' :='-""-"=-'=" =-'- "'~ ~-. -,"-. -i-'~'-'---77--'-"'- ---"" ;..,
" ' ______ ~~ Nl
. I - '-' -' l -" g' ,
~ '- I -=" I I WJj"-- i
. I, I I" .
I [' I I -
l ~ I I I , - - - ~ -.-
oJ , I : I
II
i \
I,
! I
. '!~.
~~ t!<"? UJJ
i. \~1 \ 17
I'S! I
~"'~\
__~ I ~"~
1lD.0000SF'o:.II q
AQIl2f1~;ll'
\O'~,I
=::.~~~/II
:.;-r-. Lr
"ISJ /"
,,,"" ,
:"0:- \ i i" f1
._--Y il'/
II; : ..
I I =-,
! '. ~ .
, I
~ ~;.- ""I
'v," --..
~.... "";'-'" i:; ,< t- '-
''''- . "-) II'
.0.01 ~'.
"I1~1 .( n"::=-..'
ur<<Q '\ ,J;
I _1_ I
! I
I
'V-"'-
,'< -
f.;n - t;t g1
I
I 8
I i
i I~
..
1 I~
I i
~
RrAIL Rt/)C
I
i
I
- I
J I I
it' -,-,
ill l_:~
wi
...-
,
,
I I
I I
9tf'~ 3'1-tl-
-(~ *,;;
1~- J<-(i
5/'r~
-
-6 C-..J
) ...// 'If'l
*
.....:~.::.:- \
\_-
---
N8r""08~ .351,dlr
Lond Use
High Density Residenliol (128 Du,IAc.)
Zoning
R 1 AA-PUD
g
/1
~
;
~u ~'"
~:2~U
~
'0
S
Site Plan