REVIEW COMMENTS
-l1 ~--td7i
8vvv<. S'/ft. p~
f,'l.e..
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 95-248
TO:
Grady Swann, Finance Director
D & [& & U w & m,
AUG 4 /995 'i ,I!
~. >.- ..-
PLANNING AND
lON,:t,'G DfPr
,
-~,~...,
FROM:
John A. Guidry, Utilities Director
DATE:
July 31, 1995
SUBJECT: Reservation Fee Transmittal - Sausalito Place
Enclosed is check no. 1078 from Four Waves at Sausalito Place Ltd. in the amount
of $ 22,730.40 as the reservation fee for a proposed development of 164 single
family homes to be located west of Lawrence Road, north of Military Trail.
Please deposit this check in the appropriate account and refer any questions on this
matter to Peter Mazzella of this office.
JAG/PVM
bc: Peter Mazzella
xc: Tambri Heyden, Planning Director
File
HPT
PROFESSIONAL hNGINEERING
[b~1f1f~[R1
IF' 1f[R1~~~~D1f1f~[b
2295 Corporate Blvd, N, W. Executive Court One, Suite 215
Boca Raton, FL 33431 . TeI407,GG8-0055 . Fax 407,241-4934
CONSULTANTS, INC.
Land Development . Environmental
Governmental
DATE l' - 2 e:, , ~ ':S
ATTE:NTION
'P~ C \'--'\ ~ "Ct:: E L '--A
JO. NO
..
L\>=
'--bLC
TO
C' \"1
\
of ~'-1.....r-ro-')~U-1.
\ \
0T\I....A'TI~
WE ARE SENDING YOU ,9(AltaChed
o Shop drawings 0
o Under separate cover Yia \--l"DN,D CX::-<- ,
the following items:
Prints
o Plans
o Samples
o Specifications
o Copy of letter
o Change order
o
COPI ES OATE NO, OESCRtPTJON
\ C'C.- \:i: \~112=. \ N \\.-'\~ ;::::'I""~-::'~'\ C::>t;-
-$. "2- 'L. \ 6c!, , ~ ,
E-8-c:..... \'2.E ':::::C:---\2->-l 0\"\ ~--=> 'P-=== I
\ i
i
<
i
I
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
o For approyal
~ For your use
J- As requested
o For review and comment
o ApproYed as submitted 0 Resubmit_copies for approyal
o ApproYed as noted 0 SubmIt_copies for distribution
o Returned for corrections 0 Return _corrected prints
o
o FOR BIDS OUE
19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER lOAN TO US
REMARKS
~
,%~':l
~~:-\'\S'-S
'-)-\~"'\Y.
'-(\' \ \
\)\\
COpy TO
SIGNED: \ ~"-,~
" .ncIOlut.. .,. not .II' noted. III"dly nol"1 UI .r onclt
\~~
\
J; L (', (' c,?:;' )-.,
(! t ('1 &f (te tf.~1-~
, flu/- Lit.! c{ )J.2.{{'-Z,'
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-059
RE:
TRAFFIC OBSERVATIONS - LAWRENCE ROAD
@
TO:
c~~rie A. Parker, City Manager
~~iam Hukill, P.E., City Engineer
March 6, 1995
.:!
FROM:
DATE:
The 1994 average traffic count on Lawrence Road between NW 22nd
Avenue (Gateway) and Hypoluxo has been reported to us by the County
to be 7972 trips, The current FDOT Level of Service Manual defines
the threshold traffic level for LOS D for 2 lane undivided streets
as 13,400 trips.
Those two numbers are important in studying Lawrence Road traffic
because the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering Division has
informed Mr. Hall of this office that widening of two lane roads in
the County system is not seriously considered until LOS D is
reached. Lawrence Road is a County road.
The Traffic Division has also opined that about 1000 more units can
be occupied on Lawrence Road before LOS D is reached. Well over
1000 more units have been approved by either the City or County, as
follows:
l Lawrence Oaks 178 units
" Nautica I 177 units
'- Nautica II 197 units
... -Msadewwuud GJ.uvt:: ( dre Kno II wooda~,..s 539 units
Fox Hollow (aka Manor Forest) 185 unbuil t units, est.
.... Sausalito Groves 164 unbuilt units, est.
i.-- Jonathan's Grove 32 units
.... Lawrence Grove 75 unbuilt units, est.
.... Citrus Glen 20 unbui1t units, est.
/.-- Citrus Park 113 units
TOTAL
1680 unoccupied units
The figure 1680 is not propounded to be exact, because each of the
entries marked "unbuilt units" represents our estimate, of how many
units remain to be occupied in uncompleted developments. Traffic
from occupied units appears in actual traffic counts totaling 7972
trips. We believe it is reasonable to predict that when all
unoccupied units in all listed developments are in place, the Level
of Service Standard will exceed LOS Standard E, which is 15,000
trips. LOS D will be reached when approximately 2/3 of the 1680
future units are occupied.
Engineering Division Memo No. 95-059
Traffic Observations - Lawrence Road
March 6, 1995
Page #2
We have been unable to obtain accurate estimates of revenue
collected from dwelling units now contributing to the 7972 trips on
Lawrence Road. If we assume 1600 dwelling units have generated
those trips, and the average traffic impact fee collected was $1500
per unit, the total fees generated to date exceed $2,400,000. The
total fees due from 1680 additional units will exceed $2,500,000,
representing a total at build-out of $5,000,OOO~ generated by these
developments to be spent in the immediate area. These numbers are
estimates, of course, and should be adjusted for traffic impact
fees generated by other users who pay such fees (commercial, etc.)
and those who don't (schools).
Our conclusion is that it is time for the County to begin planning
for widening of Lawrence Road so that when LOS D is reached, action
can be immediately implemented to begin construction. A four lane
undivided road will support 23,520 trips at LOS D, which is
adequate for all completed and currently proposed development along
Lawrence Road.
WVH/ck
C:LAWRENCE.LOS
xc: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Ken Hall, Engineering Aide
Michael Rumpf, Senior planner
TAlILII lA
LEVi:L or 5li:RVlCIi: D
Teet 1 Alternate
Peak Hour ADT Tnt 1
1.03 D L03D LOS D
FIICILITY l'YPIl S'l'II~DARD STIINDARJ) S'l'ANDJUU>
2 lanes undi...ide<l 1,220 13, 4. 00 1,030
3 lane. two-way 1,260 14,000 1,090
2 tanoy one-way 1,600 17,600 2,650
3 lane8 o~",-way 2,460 27,000 4,000
4. l.5nea undiylded. 2,140 23,520 1,770
4. laneu <1iv.\.dgd 2,&70 29,400 2,210
5 lanes divided 2,670 29,400 2,210
6 latl... divided 4,100 45,000 3,330
8 lanes divided 5,070 55,800 4,170
4 l~neB ex?rcssway 6,070 68,900 3,450
6 lanes expresy'""ay 9,100 103,400 5,110
a lane= ~xpre'~w4Y 12, 130 131,900 6,890
10 tanes ~xpr~a~w~y 15,170 172,300 8,610
SOurce, ~OOT Level ot Service Mdnual, Generalized Daily Level of Service
Maximum VolumeB, Group C and Croup 1, and Generalized Peak Hour/Peak
Directional l.evel Of serv:'c:e Haximuln volwnes, croup A and Group 1 tor
urbani:e~ area. (April 1992).
~or the Detailed Analysis for Alternate Teet One. Level of Service 0 shall be the
Sum of the Crltical Volumes of one thousand f~ur hutldred (1,400) itl accordance
with the Planning Method itl the 1985 Manual,
TABLli 10
LEVEL OF SERVICE E
Teet 1 Alt"rtlate
Peak Hour Teat 1
LOS I!: LOS I!: LOD I!:
f'ACILI'T'f 'l''(Pf. S'l'IIHDI\I\I) B'l'hNOI\f<D STANDI\I\I)
2 lall~1il u ndi-J L:led 1,370 15,000 1,2BO
3 lanp.9 t',JO-\O'iY 1,450 15,700 1,340
2 lane. on.-way 1,760 19,300 3,120
3 lanes one-lIay 2,660 29,300 4,510
4 anell uncHvictr.<:! 2, "0 25,800 2,080
4 l.sneD d~vlrled. 2,930 32,200 2,600
6 lanG 0 t""Q-~'ay 2,\130 J2,200 2.600
6 l.J:ney divid~d 4,440 48,800 3,B90
e latles divided 5,550 60,400 4,870
4 lanO!s expr"ssway 6,500 74,000 3,710
6 lan~B eXfrc ssway 9,780 111,200 5,560
II un... ""pr"3.way lJ,Ol;O 1",200 7,410
10 ld:'\e:! e.xpa:eeeWB}' 16,310 186,300 9,260
Source, rOOT Level of Service Manual, G"n"ral!:~d Daily Level of Service
Ila"lmur" Volume8, Group C and Group 1, and Genecalhed Peak lIour/Peak
Oi~ectiona1 Level of Service Maximum Volumes, Group A and Group Hol:'
urb~ni.ect areas (April 19'2).
i'.:)~ cho O..,t:ailod An.a.ly.i.. for 1..LtQ~nat" '1'eet On.# Level of Sarvlce E shall be the
Sum of tho Critical Voluma. of one thousand five hundred (1,5001 in accordance
with the Plannlng M..thod in the 1985 Manual.
The Level of Serv1~8 Standards tor Teat 2 are Level ot 8ervice E in ~abl. ls.
TOTAL P.02
Fair Share contribution tor Road Improv.ment. r.. Table
Boynton B.ach _
Deacription
Road Fe.
,-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReaLdentLal
Single F&mily Detached
Single Family Att. per unit
Congr Living Facil, per unit
Moblle Home
Non-ReaLdent Lal
1,650.00
1,155.00
353.93
825.00
\
----------------.------------.
-Cenera1 Of fLce
10,000 aq.ft. per 1,000 eq.ft~
50,000 eq.tt. per 1,000 eq.ft.
100,000 aq.ft. per 1,000 aq.tt.
150,000 aq.ft. per 1,000 eq.ft.
200,000 eq.ft. per 1,000 aq.ft.
300,000 aq.ft. per 1,000 eq.ft.
400,000 aq.tt. per 1,000 aq.ft.
500,000 aq.ft. per 1,000 aq.ft.
600,000 eq.ft. per 1,000 eq.ft.
700,000 aq,ft. per 1,000 aq.ft.
800,000 aq.ft.' oyer per 1,000 aq.ft.
'" ,~~ical Office per 1,000 ~q_:_~t:.:
-.-"
"
1,353.00
911.90
771.65
699.05
651. 75
592.35
547.80
519.75
497.75
481.25
465.30
1,879.35
Cenaral Commercial Ratai1 Examplea
-----------------------------.---------------------
.
I
10;000 aq.ft. par 1,000 aq.ft.
50,000 aq.tt. per 1,000 ag.ft.
100,000 aq.ft. per 1,000 sq.ft.
200,000 ag.ft. per 1,000 ag.ft.
300,000 ag.ft. per 1,000 ag.ft.
400,000 aq.ft. per 1,000 aq.ft.
SOO,OOO sg.ft. per 1,000 ag.ft.
600,000 ag.ft. per 1,000 ag.ft.
800,000 aq,ft. per 1,000 ag.ft.
1,000,000 Ig.ft. per 1,000 aq.ft.
1,200,000 ag.ft. per 1,000 sg.ft.
1,400,000 eq.ft. per 1,000 eq.ft.
1,600,000 ag.ft. per 1,000 aq.ft.
5,069.60
2,822.82
2,215.50
I', 7oll..5J
1,648.37
1,479.10
1,403.00
1,359.49
1,360.28
1,359.01
1,384.U
1,398.19
1,431.93
Miscellaneoua
cf< J,: L
~ ~.{ 1\1
Hospital, per bad ~ ::>
Hurling Home, per bed ~ Il.f. AJ
Warehouae per 1,000 ag.ft. ~J
HinL-warehouae per 1,000 sq.ft ~J
Gen. Recreation per parking apace
General Industrial per 1,000 eq.ft.
Fast Food wi Drive Thru per 1,000 eq.ft.,
-Quality R..taurant per 1,000 aq.ft.
-High Turnover Sit Down Reat. per 1,000 aq.ft.
DrLve-In Bank per 1,000 aq.tt.
Gas Station per station
Convenience Store per 1,000 eg.ft.
Hovie Theater per Beat
Racguet Club per court
Church/Synagogue per 1,000 _q.ft.
Day Care Center per 1,000 _q.ft.
New Car Sales per 1,000 .q.ft.
Carpet Stores per 1,000 eq.ft.
Veterinary Clinic per 1,000 eq.ft.
Hotel per room
Hotel per room
Elementary Schoole ~er 1,000 eq.ft.
Hlgh Schools per 1,COO sq. ft.
"
.
647.35
143.00
268.40
143.55
165.00
383.35
12,168.31
4,511.84
9,600.58
7,876.74
8,639.40
11,152.10
96.80
2,359.50
512.60
3,923.37
2,638.35
5.95
1,804.00
560.45
478.50
589.60
599.50
\
FROM:
Mattie Hirth
~~ Marttila
f~ ~ lUJJ~~~1
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENJ I!ilv '\ II i';" :i "
MEMORANDUM NO. 95 - 675 p}triltll~!UI''jP Il~l
'~~~~OW~~'"':
II D n '
i1iD .' "I'~ U,I
. III " """'-"1
I \
BUILDING
TO:
DATE:
November 28, 1995
SUBJECT: Rectified copy of modified master plan
Please check your files if Building or Engineering Division has
received a rectified copy of modified master plan for the
following:
1, Sausalito Groves, File No. ANNX 95-003 (Master Plan
Modification Proposed Annexation) (Hand delivered
around November 3, 1995),
2 .
Lawrence Lake, File No,
Modification to add two
October 26, 1995),
MPMD 95-005 (Master Plan
lots) (Hand delivered around
The rectified copy has a large stamp on each of the set of plans
with original sign-offs of the Technical Committee Reviewers.
Please advise me as soon as possible, so our files can be closed
out.
Thank you
XC: Michael E, Haag
11/30/95
PER LYNN HAYS. BOTH SETS OF SUBJECT PLANS ARE IN BUILDING, PLAN
REVIEW AND PERMITTING SECTION.
@
MATTIE
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-675
FROM:
Mattie Hirth
~~ Marttila
TO:
DATE:
November 28, 1995
SUBJECT:
Rectified copy of modified master plan
Please check your files if Building or Engineering Division has
received a rectified copy of modified master plan for the
following:
1. Sausalito Groves, File No. ANNX 95-003 (Master Plan
Modification Proposed Annexation) (Hand delivered
around November 3, 1995),
2 .
Lawrence Lake, File No. MPMD
Modification to add two lots)
October 26, 1995),
95-005 (Master Plan
(Hand delivered around
The rectified copy has a large stamp on each of the set of plans
with original sign-offs of the Technical Committee Reviewers.
Please advise me as soon as possible, so our files can be closed
out,
Thank you
XC: Michael E. Haag
~"
PLANNING AND ZONING DEP,z\RTMENT MEMORANDUM
TO: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
Lt, Jim Cummings, Police Department
JohD Wildner, Parks superintendent . _~~
Kevin Ha::'lahan, Forestel-!Environmentalj,st V' ~ ~
Clyde "Skip" Hilor, :Jtilities Chief Field Insp,
B1::'1 Hukill, Development Director
Michael Haag, Planning & Zoning Department
FROM: Tambri ], Heyden #
Planning and Zoning Director
DATE: November 10, 1994
SUBJECT: Staff review of Sausalito Groves
(proposed residential development to be annexed)
please review the attached plan for the proposed duplex
development to be known as Sausalito Groves, The development is
to be located northwest of the intersectIon of Lawrence Road and
N,W, 22nd Avenue (Gateway Boulevard) in unincorporated Palm Beach
County. The attached plan reflects the recent master plan
approval from Palm Beach county, The property is proposed to be
annexed in December as a PUD,
Please provide written comments which indicate aspects of the
plan that do net meet CIty codes and any design questions you may
have, Please submit your comments to me by 5:00 p,m., November
17,1994,
attachment
ejh
xc: MEMO ONLY
Floyd Jordan, Fire Chief
Charles Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director
Thomas Dettman, Police Chief
John Guidry. Utilities Director
Pete Mazzella, AssIstant t~ Utilities Director
Steve Campbell, Fire Department
Bob Gib;3on. Pub::' ic works
Centl'al File
A: SGrovCom
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM 194-412
TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist f<~jI
Sausalito Groves - Proposed Annexation
RE:
DATE:
November 16, 1994
The applicant should be advised that the project would require
submission of the following:
1. Existing trees survey of the site.
2. Tree Management Plan for existing trees.
3. Littoral and Upland Planting Plan for the lake.
4. Li ttoral/Upland Management Plan for maintenance (of # 3 above) .
These items should be submitted with the preliminary plat (items
#1,#2) and with the site plan (items #3, #4).
KH:ad
ill
NOV I 6.
PlANNING AND
ZONING DEPT,
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #94-272
TO: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ: Review - Sausalito Groves
DATE: November 15, 1994
The Public Works Department has no problems with the above site.
RE/cr
rn
1\
I 71994
00
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
71...-.. ;1..~
-~
BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Office of Professional Standards
To:
From:
Date:
Re:
Tambri Heyden I Dircc~o
Lt. James Cwnmings
18 November 1994
Sausalito Groves Dcvelopment
TRC Memo # 94-0103
I have reviewed the plana for the Sausalito Groves Developmcnt and find it to be acceptable at
this time,
~ ~i"~' ~:~ ~ @
~~~Ngt~o
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM 94-418
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Director
Planning & Zoning
,uperintendent~
FROM:
John Wildner, Parks
RE:
Sausalito Groves
DATE:
November 21, 1994
The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the annexation
request for Sausalito Groves, the following information is
submitted:
1. Based on 164 single family and duplex units, the recreation
dedication requirement is 164 d.u. X .018 acres/d.u. = 2.952
acres.
2. Plans indicate three private recreation amenities:
1. poo 1
2. tennis court
3. clubhouse
3. By adding two additional private amenities, the developer
would be eligible for one-half credit towards the dedication
requirement. Due to limited space, suggested amenities could
be:
4. lighted shuffleboard courts
5. family picnic area
4.
Assuming one-half credit
dedication requirement would
for private
be 2.952 acres
2
recreation,
= 1.476 acres.
the
We recommend that this requirement be met with cash in lieu of
land.
JW:ad
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM 94-418
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Director
Planning & Zoning
RE:
Sausalito Groves
superintendent~
FROM:
John Wildner, Parks
DATE:
November 21, 1994
The Recreation & Park
request for Sausalito
submitted:
Department has reviewed the annexation
Groves, the following information is
1. Based on 164 single family and duplex units, the recreation
dedication requirement is 164 d.u. X .018 acres/d.u. = 2.952
acres.
2. Plans indicate three private recreation amenities:
1. poo 1
2. tennis court
3. clubhouse
3. By adding two additional private amenities, the developer
would be eligible for one-half credit towards the dedication
requirement. Due to limited space, suggested amenities could
be:
4. lighted shuffleboard courts
5. family picnic area
4.
Assuming one-half credit for private
dedication requirement would be 2.952 acres
2
recreation, the
= 1.476 acres.
We recommend that this requirement be met with cash in lieu of
land.
JW:ad
"?;"'VS4uT'Z> C,f2-W-S PuP
f"'I2't'!IIv~ SPk6- ~"-- GM't'i. ~~r.. @M<;~..!J h)lJtrlY30
flt.e.K,(!(, .s fAc.6:; t,~ i1~ tf-po.f:A mAL-';).5"
","s->,-"'o' I foO tl /?..~, ~t.... ::/:IID:/e?, S.f~1
'#.'-'>' oft;) = ~ ~ (2.",1.. : /.'30 = ;)7
c.o~/Jo =- ~;)a'o ~ 1b-M ~ ~ h~ I
~ ":-''1= 7 St~
frAc-C f>/20'S6~1 s,1&1ojj,61 /101 h [; IJ.sflY/6v'r f>pc J;RABL~ p,..~ 1'7lAGf'
) I .
5f'=-~1 1 dA) TPlF- ft4tJ !Jr...1 IIV,+- I.lls f7poi ~ P~"'J4 JfA-a..S
SrMe:- lJ/.IOcl.... ff.IVA'lt: (?~.6-J-,'>N 7P~r s;~ f/4<1 ,&v,b./ Ir; t..~lfUo t.. ~ f~c S,-It
/
11Vc..~{)I"'/' ~SJ/A:o ~c, ~{L:S4} &~I S.6!JJ.66 ""...... of'-o..!JSf~ ~"'VIV
A-~ !...I,IJ~Sc/)I'1Vl. I AI e-ko"<J I tP:!!'I4""'~1\ #t.op:cr t..t,..,,,,soI',,J{,..
1as.f"\.bJe -r1J{, Ci>IJ.~P-. Lot 'rIIC,h<- Lo-r Q:;nJ(... {)fI....vW6 ,?N':J ~((.de~ ~ I06u1i7"'':
F>& -(l.J~
Ot1J rlJ~ [1.,J/V PJt: fC(?;II'/.l:.Jl...t.. SerCkt:.fA:...s lie:! It- ~ rol.L.c~IM. (p.f3::
~~ ~ 4Jiff jJJI ~/,~ ~~~ M s~4i'-
, I 1 ) q I foA... t.ors q _~ Agt- lblJ", reur LUI~
x 7JJf?4 &:.r.s / - 11.1jc kAl< Sf.:r8.4-cK. ~lS" ('~ l:f6/2tvr ,,*,,''T) -;;>D
m s~TBIU<.S ff.f,,/(>t:D At St." ilo", c::; J3. "I- App6vI), 'I.. B. 771-6 ,%41- S"f=T/3,4/<..5
;}.o'
~ to/.-.. Gt.>!r /-9 111_'" '~(b"...m~.v~~ "/1? ~ /14/<:4 ;7J€ ~/loA.)t S6.-Tfj.4eX.
eG
c:rytl")
.I'~p o~ '. l.
'f TPP..U.. ~ 73 -gl. TJ.t f(;~ 11.. Sl:r(J.4-e1i Po,- &,'fy '3 -) (P SiltJLL (5.:
U:J,.JSIJf6..n- N,tl./ f/.k!, Stf:7()Ic/o?S 4rv1t4> By S'';;:ci4N '1 e ~I-
mp~l-,l t. 1#& !:6At. S"~r{JAd:5 /{,L Cvlr /(.. - <i'l,ArM !G--"'-U>/I....,.etoJ{)!:!)
1'" />')"1<,# Wi!: 6)6 ' ~T ~ t;.re1l.ft
>r
Nl.>I.2..T'tJvk.,,-r CORN~\<. lJ~"'" nJcf' 8v1L11l0U:: ,4-~ ~ !.or"? BE
r;/
~,
/
;x
\!7{
Ait>i>A1J :5.1"f:. of.- t#6 &,h8& ;/~A k- &- g11?~ ;;rt>/
KJu )(
(,U15.&t :::itJt:, <' f- T'l+ B<JLI,c...41$<<- ,4RE:;4 tfL t,r /// ,8.... <70 I
1';.;& rM,v+- 5ero,k,J( /06IV7i.0t;o flU rue. CIiMr orC:r, ,U..l (pR{L.',sfJI",j)
4--<1lru I}j.,t:. jZ(l-b.<Ji Sf=rB/(d 1()~1'if,€:-O 61'\.1 i",;!: PtAI\.) , J:.~i11"'(:"V{)
1V4r ,:)0' &:- 'p.€; ~"'! S:.~JC'.,c:, 4~~ Dill rJJi:. S',o~( &I<"""'''-''O~
(jjl,4/Jr,( s~~ leA,J 4A.. Sf.,B,i'<:J<i), /100 A- 5'6<:::77.>,0 hV ~e i:6lAPf mJr 1(J:OIoJ7jt~.5
pI~
, /j
c; /, ,;/,{:JL", ;/'~~7 ': '7 L /j U
'-.,/ L,-", r' - v'-- k, /'Uf'?-c-"'r..t2> '-C.Jl.. ,;5'.0 ~::"-:1 w ,
l- l/~ I c4~I)---\
I) II L /
I tAre 0--- 1\\(:jl)G.'1 .,~ (L
v 'I
l
"
, 7
tili ' /1.0<-" 'I ,~( 1-{~-0
M s~' c,-.,~~ I~(
fh-<-/'~"J tl0\~ ('~ (:<.J:
It ~]i1 f~c. :t~'
I ,/J I
/ I
:e.
- [,C CJr~
(
t2t,~~ (!~~t'
,
L R ,oVf~ ~~~;(
~ ?
P'~7' C:K" J1:-~ ~
/ U ,c,*' .-r.P~
/q rj
0- ,
\ ~;J'l'F
4111 ~~~ v " 16huo
..i ~~ ~.J:;!: ~ ~
~l ?/ ~/
~~1
~/
/'1\..IJu / tI ~
~. ( I r
~~
~ w~ ,~ ~
rf uJ .!~~ .' ~ '. <;;:r
/lY" .' ' /!I!.J~ ~::>-0 ' 1/' -': "J>
J,;- (.1--:rlJ t"~/J~ ~i...J.. . j:~~./ - !.K....
_____ v~.
IV ~ ? 'f/",uur
~
.' - tb"'&t<./"~~~
!rJ#~~(~
/""[1 . ~ ;z-.J-':--
,0f;f fu::tJ?f:;::j::;t;/J/UuL
diftciJ.& {!_c-cJ 'fc>>~/r2~
_ . -,ld__ /
_ ~ J:.,r..,L~ -~-
O<P.' ~~~~7 ·
r ~ ",' (.0 -tn-- J..... n.d
CO,'" fi/"'" . l v,~' V v.
Hr-r ;(~~ ~ r r~ ~
~ h..t 1\~ '?V' ~
IcyI;;/? ct-
, ~r~" L1 ~
r~+ot~~
~~d>> ~-
:5W/~r~~OeL
~- I~
~
rrv~~~
~ _ F~ f --/~e pc- ~
~
t!AJ-bJ ~~~
,N "!J- b-<- !i" () · ~
J t:i4-- Vv~
~ ~ _ ~ ,,~(if r N:J
~-hI(rr;17 ~ ~
d;JI p'-<A/-tlA-I- .?o '
. I
~ t~-4
;;dbt:k r jIPC.
~~~
j'u2~ ' --- .
y (V;;~ (f; /
-
~
~
~ Qe,1# ~
T(); T~ \t\ e. i2. \ 1-\ t; YD \:: )\j --L ~ -\ Z "D'I R '
DEI?AR.~'~NT O~- DEVELO~-~
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 94-369
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, Fl 33435
Phone:
(407) 375-6373 (Bldg.)
375-6280 (Eng.)
PLANS REVIEW COMMENTS
Name of Reviewer IItJk~t.~ Reviewer Phone# 37~.{'~ ~3 ~hh~l...l..~
Type of Rev~ew P1<'~ -, '''''1 r.J Project ."AU,'qAu-r G:.':<..:.'::::'$ _ COUIV ....)
Date of Revl.ew // / Contractor U/'Jkt.-htll.)r...J ,
1st Review 2nd Review Other
Your permit application and supporting documentation do not comply with the
City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances as described below (see attached
sheets if applicable). Please correct documents to comply with the comments
and resubmit two (2) corrected sets of plans to the Building Division.
Direct any questions to the reviewer named above. If a conference with the
reviewer is necessary, an appointment is recommended. To expedite the
process, changes may be made to the permit documents at the Building Division
by the applicant or his agent. (Proof of authorization is required of anyone
other than the design professional prior to making changes to signed and
sealed documents). Timely approval of your project is dependent upon your
prompt response to the comments.
2.
3.
...--",4.
5.
______ 6 .
7.
._____8.
9.
110.
L--11.
-12.
13.
14.
_15.
16.
17.
18.
1.
Applicant shall provide the Engineering Dept. the source of fill
material and haul route prior to beginning of construction. Additional
permits may be required depending on this information.
No construction is allowed in public R!W.
Verify which roads require naming (for ma~l d~liVef,y(.fi) ith U.S. Postal
Service. 'c1{vL( ') crr;' " f....,{.. ",
Site plan review & approval required. ~ '(17)' f v e c f/1 lvfi "~ZV
Survey must comply with Chapter 4, Sec. 7, Par. 7.1 of Land Development
Regulations, Part III, including, but not limited to, deeds, easements
or other instruments recorded in pUblic record.
Establish a L. A. E. (limited access easement) along the back of lots
abutting Lawrence Road (see App. C, Art. IX, Sec. 7).
Provide Certification by Developer's Engineer that drainage plan
complies with all City codes & standards (see Chap. 5, Art. X & App. C).
Locate and identify the necessary drainage easements within the
development (App. C, Art. X, Sec. 6).
Provide stop signs in accordance with the "Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices".
Provide sidewalk locations & details.
Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and collector streets
(see App. C, Art. IX, Sec. 11).
Provide a parking facility for the recreation area inclUding H/C stall
(see App. A, Sec. 11H(e)).
Minimum pavement width 22' (ll'/lane for local road). (see App. C, Art.
X, Sec. 10).
Landscaping plan shall designate areas of sodding and seeding.
Establish deed restrictions providing for a P.O.A. (property owners
association) to pay for the operation of a street light system within
the development (see App. C, Art. IX, Sec. 14).
A signed and sealed survey not more than six month out-of-date for the
site to include topography. Survey must comply with Chapter 4, Sec. 7,
Par. 7.1 of Land Development Regulations, Part III, including, but not
limited to, deeds, easements or other instruments recorded in pUblic
record.
Provide plans for the abatement of nuisances such as blowing of dust and
sand.
Provide surety for seeding, mUlching and road repairs.
rn
WVH/ck
A:SAUSALGR.TRC
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-532
TO:
Robert Eichorst, Public Works
Al Newbold, Building Division
William Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Sgt. Marlon Harris, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Envlronmentalist
Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities chief Field Insp.
Bill Hukill, Developmeft Department
Mlchael E. Ha~a~'~
Site and Zonlng lopment Admlnlstrator
September 28, 199
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT: Sausalito Groves PUD - Master Plan
(sign-off)
- File # ANNX 9S-003
The amended master plan for Sausalito place PUD has been submitted
for final sign-off by the Technical Review Committee. Three (3)
sets of plans, each requiring your unconditional signature, are
available for review in the Plannlng and Zonlng Department. A copy
of the orlginally reviewed plans, staff comments and City
Commission approval of the Master Plan Modification will be
available for your use to perform the reVlew,
Please review and sign-otf each of the three (3) sets of plans, NO
LATER THAN 5:00 P.M., OCTOBER 4, 1995. If the plans are not in
compliance with your staff comments or City regulations, sign the
plans "subject to memo". To facilitate the slgn-oft process,
please resubmit written comments addressed to the Planning and
zoning Director, NO LATER THAN 5:00 P.M., OCTOBER 4, 1995.
It should be noted that the applicant is processing, through the
Development Department, plat documents for the project. The plat
and construction documents shall coincide with the Signed-off
Master Plan, any major devlation deslred by the developer must be
approved by the Technical Review Committee.
Thank you for your prompt response to this request.
MEH:bme
cc: Floyd Jordan, Fire Chief
Charles Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director
Thomas Dettman, police Chief
John Guidry, Utillties Director
Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & zoning Director
Pete Mazzella, Assistant to Utllities Director
Steve campbell, Fire Department
Central File
l!I ;w15iqnof .SAU
MEMO TO FILE
/1~+
p
FROM:
~iam
Hukill, P.E., City Engineer
DATE:
December 22, 1994
RE:
SAUSALITO GROVES PLAT
A park dedication or fee in lieu of dedication is due from subject
development prior to submission of final plat to City Commission.
WVH/ck
C:SAUSALIT.MTF
xc: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Charles Frederick, Recreation & Park Director
Ken Hall, Engineering Aide
n.';~I-. Th ~ ~ ~\j] ~ Imll
. \1 ' 1\ p
, n " .., ,. tV 'k J'
. ,.~ ',., 1 ( 'I I.'. ~ " \.-.'"
'--~')}0:;li'ti1:i~J
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM 194-412
TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist f<~~
Sausalito Groves - Proposed Annexation
RE:
DATE:
November 16, 1994
The applicant should be advised that the project would require
submission of the following:
1. Existing trees survey of the site.
2. Tree Management Plan for existing trees.
3. Littoral and Upland Planting Plan for the lake.
4. Li ttoral/Upland Management Plan for maintenance (of # 3 above) .
,
These items should be submitted with the preliminary plat (items
#1,#2) and with the site plan (items #3, #4).
KH:ad
, <;s //'1
9/,l/ ~ - 38//
10:;-1)
s~ k
X .
({.
rc/~ (
~
~!OV I 6 i994
00
PLANNING AND l,l
ZONING DEPT. >>'
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM 94-418
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Director
Planning & Zoning
superintendent~
FROM:
John Wildner, Parks
RE:
Sausalito Groves
DATE:
November 21, 1994
The Recreation & Park
request for Sausalito
submitted:
Department has reviewed the annexation
Groves, the following information is
1. Based on 164 single family and duplex units, the recreation
dedication requirement is 164 d.u. X .018 acres/d.u. = 2.952
acres.
2. Plans indicate three private recreation amenities:
I. pool
2 . tennis court
3. clubhouse
3. By adding two additional private amenities, the developer
would be eligible for one-half credit towards the dedication
requirement. Due to limited space, suggested amenities could
be:
4. lighted shuffleboard courts
5. family picnic area
4.
Assuming one-half credit for private
dedication requirement would be 2.952 acres
2
recreation, the
= 1.476 acres.
We recommend that this requirement be met with cash in lieu of
land.
JW:ad
NOY
2:
ill
00
mowrn
.,....,-
<....'-'~
...."'"
TO; Tt:\~<oe.\Ht;:;YDI?J0-L '? "z 1)', R ~
DEPAR.T EN'T O.l:!'- DE:VE:L< ?MENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 94-369
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FI 33435
Phone: (407) 375-6373 (Bldg.)
375-6280 (Eng.)
PLANS REVIEW COMMENTS
Name of Reviewer hlljR~ ~d. ~ Reviewer Phone# 6~ ~ 2. ~ 3 ~fJr-o.l.-~
Type of Rev~ew P((,G; - ;\" ..1 .v Project :9'W,<:;AU G:,;2~':;$ CO\J", 1-)
Date of Rev~ew //// Contractor {Jl\Jkld<!'II,jl\ I ,
1st Review 2nd Review Other
Your permit application and supporting documentation do not comply with the
City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances as described below (see attached
sheets if applicable). Please correct documents to comply with the comments
and resubmit two (2) corrected sets of plans to the Building Division.
Direct any questions to the reviewer named above. If a conference with the
reviewer is necessary, an appointment is recommended. To expedite the
process, changes may be made to the permit documents at the Building Division
by the applicant or his agent. (Proof of authorization is required of anyone
other than the design professional prior to making changes to signed and
sealed documents). Timely approval of your project is dependent upon your
prompt response to the comments.
1.
2.
3.
..____A.
5.
____- 6 .
7.
.____- 8 .
9.
[:10.
11.
-12.
13.
14.
_15.
16.
17.
18.
Applicant shall provide the Engineering Dept. the source of fill
material and haul route prior to beginning of construction. Additional
permits may be required depending on this information.
No construction is allowed in public R/W.
Verify which roads require naming (for ma~l deliverY) ~ith U.S. Postal
Service. " it' -- <;) t( ')~ ,,vtt.,,:C :
Site plan review & approval required.'-' .fer. Ii c c t(illJI [>' C,
Survey must comply with Chapter 4, Sec. 7, Par. 7.1 bf Land Development
Regulations, Part III, including, but not limited to, deeds, easements
or other instruments recorded in public record.
Establish a L.A.E. (limited access easement) along the back of lots
abutting Lawrence Road (see App. C, Art. IX, Sec. 7).
Provide Certification by Developer's Engineer that drainage plan
complies with all City codes & standards (see Chap. 5, Art. X & App. C).
Locate and identify the necessary drainage easements within the
development (App. C, Art. X, Sec. 6).
Provide stop signs in accordance with the "Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices".
Provide sidewalk locations & details.
Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and collector streets
(see App. C, Art. IX, Sec. 11).
Provide a parking facility for the recreation area including H/C stall
(see App. A, Sec. 1lH(~)).
Minimum pavement width 22' (ll'/lane for local road). (see App. C, Art.
X, Sec. 10).
Landscaping plan shall designate areas of SOdding and seeding.
Establish deed restrictions providing for a P.O.A. (property owners
association) to pay for the operation of a street light system within
the development (see App. C, Art. IX, Sec. 14).
A signed and sealed survey not more than six month out-of-date for the
site to include topography. Survey must comply with Chapter 4, Sec. 7,
Par. 7.1 of Land Development Regulations, Part III, including, but not
limited to, deeds, easements or other instruments recorded in public
record.
Provide plans for the abatement of nuisances such as blowing of dust and
sand.
Provide surety for seeding, mUlching and road repairs.
WVR/ck
A:SAUSALGR.TRC
OCT I 2
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-466
~
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent j,J
Sausalito Groves: Recreation EI~ents
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
October 12, 1995
The Recreation and Park Department has reviewed the attached two letters from the developers of
Sausalito Groves. The following additional information is submitted:
I. The developer has indicated he wishes to provide 110% surety for the recreation impact fee
until the first C.O. for the properties. Pending approval by the City Commission, this option
is available to be proposed by the developer.
2. The developer also indicates that all recreation elements will be completed to coincide with
the completion of the model homes. We recommend that the C.O.'s for recreation elements
and model homes be issued concUlTently upon the completion of both.
JW:ad
xc: William Hukill, Director of Development
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-169
TO:
Chairman and Members,
Planning and Development Board
Tambri J. HeYden,~~
Planning and Zoning Director
kteU 0, iL~
Michael W~-~pf,
Senior Planner
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
June 10, 1994
SUBJECT:
Epstein Property/sausalito Groves (Application #3)
Annexation Program, Group 1 of Phase 2
Applications for Annexation, Land Use Amendment/Rezoning
INTRODUCTION
Following the annexation of Group 1, phase 1 (enclaves), the City
commission directed staff to, in addition to continuing efforts to
annex the enclave properties, increase the focus on Phase 2 of the
annexation program beginning with the annexation of those eligible
properties located within the service area, immediately west of the
City. Eligible properties are defined as those contiguous
properties whose owners have consented to being annexed. The'
Epstein Property, which is managed by Maurice Epstein, Trustee,-is
'one of-~Ive eligible properties (see location map).
The subject property is undeveloped, and based upon the existence
of fruit trees, may have once been used as a commercial citrus I
grove. However, three different development proposals have been
,
approved for this site by Palm Beach county, beginning with a plan I
for 210 garden apartments in 1983. subsequent proposals have i
included a mobile home park and ACLF in 1989, and most recentl!J
(May 1994), a plan for 164 duplexes.
All five (5) property owners were sent two separate notices (in
addition to the official rezoning/public hearing notice) informing
them of the City's annexation plans. In response to these notices,
representatives from Kilday & Associtates, who represent the
property owners, contacted staff and confirmed that these notices
had been received.
All five (5) applications consist of an application for annexation
and land use plan amendment/rezoning. As this property is being
annexed in accordance with the city's annexation program, staff has
completed the necessary applications, and the corresponding
application fees were waived.
The specific analysis for these applications is on the following
page and in the form of an abbreviated summary. This summary
includes a brief outline describing each property, each
application, adjacent land uses, the availability of facilities,
the basis on which each is found consistent with the comprehensive
Plan, other pertinent information, and staff's recommendation. A
location map follows this analysis.
1
APPLICATION #3 - EPSTEIN PROPERTY/SAUSALITO GROVES
~ SIZE:
31.34 acres
LOCATION:
Northwest corner of Lawrence Road and Gateway Boulevard,
. EXISTING LAND USE:
PROPOSED LAND USE:
HR8 High Residential 8 (8 du/acre)
Moderate Density Residential (7.26 du/acre)
EXISTING ZONING:
RM-SE Multi-Family Residential-S~ei~I-E~ee~~i6ft (6 du/acre)
(recent action has relinquished the Special Exception)
R-1 Single Family Residential (5.58 du/acre gross)
..
PROPOSED ZONING:
CURRENT USE: Undeveloped
PROPOSED USE: Residential (see "Other" below)
.. ADJACENT LAND USES:
LAND USE
North: L-21 Canal
Farther N. : Boynton Nurseries LOR
East: Lawrence Road
Farther E, : Lawrence Lake PUD LOR
South: Single family LR2
Farther S. : Gateway Boulevard
Royal Manor M.H. Park MR8
West: Royal Manor M.H. Park MR8
ZONING
PUD
PUD
AR
AR
AR/RS-SE
CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Consistency with the Future Land Use Plan - Consistent
.. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map does not recommend land use designations for
unincorporated properties west of Lawrence Road, Therefore, in selecting a land use
classification, staff considered densities of adjacent developments, Palm Beach
County's land use and zoning classifications, and specifically, the density of the
current development plan for the subject property. The County's land use and zoning
designations for the surrounding area have maximum densities which range between 5 and
8 dwelling units per acre. Furthermore, the density of the approved development plan
for this property is 5.2 dwelling units per acre. In order to maximize consistency
with the County's allowable densities, staff recommends the Moderate Density
Residential classification which has a maximum density of 7.26. Staff proposes to
amend the Future Land Use map to show this annexed property as Moderate Density
Residential.
Consistency with the goals, objectives, and policies - Consistent
Since the proposed land use is consistent with surrounding land uses, and annexation
of this property would be consistent with State law, there are few objectives or
policies related to this request. However, there are several issues that should be
addressed, as they describe characteristics of this site, further indicate consistency
with the Comprehensive Plan, and/or fulfill requirements of the Florida Department of
Community of Affairs with respect to the review of plan amendments.
Annexation
· This request for annexation, which is in accordance with the City's annexation program
established pursuant to Policy 8.10.4, is consistent with Florida Law. Although one
small enclave will be created by this annexation, staff will recommend that this
enclave, which is less than 10 acres, be annexed through an interlocal agreement with
Palm Beach County. It should be noted that this action was also recommended by the
County as part of their review of this proposed annexation.
Availabilitv of Facilities
Florida Administrative Code requires that the availability of, and impact upon public
facilities be analyzed. The appropriate analysis for each facility has been conducted,
and the results are summarized as follows:
Roads: No impact upon the availability of road facilities.
Water/Sewer: No impact upon the availability of water/sewer facilities.
Solid Waste: No impact upon the availability of solid waste facilities.
Recreation: No impact upon the availability of recreation facilities.
Drainage: No impact upon the availability of drainage facilities.
Imoact uoon Historical/Archeological Resources
Not applicable
2
Impact upon Native Habitats or other Environmental Resources
Not applicable
Flood Zone: liB"
. Consistencv with the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan
Based upon maximum densities allowed, the proposed designation represents a slightly
more restrictive land use classification than the County's current designation.
OTHER
· The current development proposal consists of 164 duplex units built at a gross density
of 5.2 dwelling units per acre. Based strictly on density, staff is proposing the R-1
Single Family Residential zoning district, which allows a maximum gross density of
5.58, However, it should be noted that the R-1 district is limited to single family
dwelling units, Furthermore, it should also be noted that staff was originally aware
of an approximate density to be proposed for this site; however, zoning and site plan
approval for duplex units was considered by Palm Beach County after the R-1 district
was selected by staff and legal notices were mailed.
RECOMMENDATION
~ The Planning and Zoning Department recommends that these applications submitted in
connection with the Annexation Program be approved based, in part, on the following:
1. The subject property is contiguous to the corporate limits;
2. The subject property lies within the City's Reserve Annexation Area;
3, The annexation of this property is consistent with the City's Annexation Program;
4. The proposed land use amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives am!
policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
ANX2:AXP2G1iI3.REP
3
ANNEXTATION PROGRAM
PHASE 2 - GROUP 1
LOCATION MAP
J:lYPOLUXO ROAD
"
-
L.WDD. CANAl. 1.-19
>
a:
APPLICATION # 1 ~
.-/ ~
<
L.WDD. CANAL
CD
~-...
....
S
::f
en
w
0:
(!}
:z
o
o
, APPLICATION #2
~
CI1Y
LIMITS--
BOYNTON CANAL C-16
~:::~J
APPLlCA ION #4
J
4